Agenda packet — Fowler City Council, August 18, 2026 (part 2 of 2)

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 2 1 86 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 2 1 86 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 183 2 1 97 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 284 287 97 285 285 184 97 0 0 185 0 0 Stage 1 99 99 - 187 187 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 185 188 - 99 99 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.85 6.55 7.45 6.85 6.55 4.45 - - 4.45 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.815 4.315 3.615 3.815 4.315 3.615 2.515 - - 2.515 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 607 571 876 606 572 780 1314 - - 1214 - - Stage 1 833 753 - 745 688 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 746 687 - 833 753 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 606 570 876 605 571 780 1314 - - 1214 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 606 570 - 605 571 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 832 753 - 744 687 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 745 686 - 832 753 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.95 0 0.05 0.09

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 11 - - 606 - 21 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.002 - 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - 11 0 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -
164
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 6 0 2
Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 6 0 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 3 3 2 3 3 0 0 0 9 0 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 6 0 0 6 0 0 14 17 5
Stage 1 - - - - - - 8 8 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 6 9 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1615 - - 1615 - - 1005 877 1079
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1015 889 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1017 888 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1615 - - 1615 - - 1003 0 1079
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 1003 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1014 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1016 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.45 1.45 8.57

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 327 - - 327 - - 1021
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.012
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.2 0 - 7.2 0 - 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0
165
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 156 4 2 141 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 156 4 2 141 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 175 4 2 158 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 341 346 159 343 344 178 160 0 0 180 0 0 Stage 1 163 163 - 180 180 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 178 182 - 163 164 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 607 573 878 606 574 858 1402 - - 1378 - - Stage 1 832 757 - 815 745 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 817 743 - 832 757 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 605 571 878 603 572 858 1402 - - 1378 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 605 571 - 603 572 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 830 756 - 814 744 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 816 743 - 829 755 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.74 9.2 0.05 0.11

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 11 - - 763 858 25 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.004 0.001 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - 9.7 9.2 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
166
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 35 14 16 54 7 39 23 39 9 9 22
Future Vol, veh/h 16 35 14 16 54 7 39 23 39 9 9 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - - 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 18 40 16 18 61 8 44 26 44 10 10 25
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 70 0 0 57 0 0 180 184 42 193 196 66 Stage 1 - - - - - - 77 77 - 103 103 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 103 107 - 90 93 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1511 - - 1529 - - 775 705 1020 760 694 989 Stage 1 - - - - - - 924 825 - 896 804 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 896 801 - 910 812 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1510 - - 1527 - - 725 686 1019 681 676 988 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 725 686 - 681 676 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 912 814 - 884 794 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 851 790 - 831 801 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.82 1.53 9.83 9.54

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 725 863 565 - - 366 - - 681 871
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.082 0.012 - - 0.012 - - 0.015 0.04 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.3 9.5 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.4 9.3
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 0 - - 0 - - 0 0.1
167
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 83 0 29 0 0 2 20 192 0 1 159 34
Future Vol, veh/h 83 0 29 0 0 2 20 192 0 1 159 34
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 92 0 32 0 0 2 22 213 0 1 177 38
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 456 456 196 437 474 213 214 0 0 213 0 0 Stage 1 198 198 - 258 258 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 258 258 - 179 217 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 510 496 838 525 484 819 1338 - - 1339 - - Stage 1 797 732 - 740 689 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 740 689 - 816 718 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 499 487 838 495 475 819 1338 - - 1339 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 499 487 - 495 475 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 796 731 - 726 676 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 724 676 - 784 717 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.31 9.41 0.73 0.04

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 170 - - 557 819 9 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.223 0.003 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - 13.3 9.4 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.8 0 0 - -
168
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 22 3 42 10 33 6 17 93 104 11 15
Future Vol, veh/h 0 22 3 42 10 33 6 17 93 104 11 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 23 3 43 10 34 6 18 96 107 11 15
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 45 0 0 27 0 0 126 156 25 130 125 11 Stage 1 - - - - - - 24 24 - 98 98 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 103 132 - 32 27 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1563 - - 1587 - - 847 736 1052 842 766 1070 Stage 1 - - - - - - 994 875 - 909 814 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 903 787 - 984 873 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1561 - - 1586 - - 799 714 1050 725 743 1069 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 799 714 - 725 743 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 993 875 - 882 790 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 853 764 - 875 872 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.62 9.25 10.63

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 967 1561 - - 1454 - - 726 1069
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.124 - - - 0.027 - - 0.163 0.014
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.2 0 - - 7.3 0 - 10.9 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6 0
169
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 22.9
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 189 95 15 4 0 364 0 255 35 213 92 0
Future Vol, veh/h 189 95 15 4 0 364 0 255 35 213 92 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 201 101 16 4 0 387 0 271 37 227 98 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 24.2 25.5 23.3 18.2

HCM LOS C D C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 1% 63% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 32% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 99% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 290 368 299 213 92
LT Vol 0 4 189 213 0
Through Vol 255 0 95 0 92
RT Vol 35 364 15 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 309 391 318 227 98
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.644 0.725 0.662 0.532 0.216
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.513 6.67 7.488 8.448 7.932
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 478 540 480 426 451
Service Time 5.589 4.742 5.564 6.224 5.708
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.646 0.724 0.663 0.533 0.217
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 23.3 25.5 24.2 20.5 12.9
HCM Lane LOS C D C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 4.5 6 4.8 3 0.8

Page 7 ends

170
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.6
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 20 1 150 242 563 0 0 280 227
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 20 1 150 242 563 0 0 280 227
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 22 1 161 260 605 0 0 301 244
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1429 1671 607 545 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1126 1126 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 303 545 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 149 96 496 1024 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 310 280 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 749 518 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 111 0 495 1024 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 111 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 231 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 748 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 25.96 2.92 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1024 - 351 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.254 - 0.523 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 - 26 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 2.9 - -

Page 8 ends

171
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 304 43 0 256 98 12
Future Vol, veh/h 304 43 0 256 98 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 323 46 0 272 104 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 369 0 619 346
Stage 1 - - - - 346 -
Stage 2 - - - - 272 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1184 - 451 694
Stage 1 - - - - 714 -
Stage 2 - - - - 771 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1184 - 451 694
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 451 -
Stage 1 - - - - 714 -
Stage 2 - - - - 771 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 15.22

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 469 1184 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.25 - - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.2 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

172
Section , Item A
Existing AM HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
Existing AM Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.4
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 251 33 125 194 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 251 33 125 194 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 267 35 133 206 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 133 - 0 -
Stage 1 133 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 856 0 - 0
Stage 1 888 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 856 - - -
Stage 1 888 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.1 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 856 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.312 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 -

Page 10 ends

173
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 164 0 2 127 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 164 0 2 127 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 176 0 2 137 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 320 319 139 317 322 176 141 0 0 176 0 0 Stage 1 143 143 - 176 176 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 177 176 - 141 145 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.34 6.74 6.44 7.34 6.74 6.44 4.34 - - 4.34 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.716 4.216 3.516 3.716 4.216 3.516 2.416 - - 2.416 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 593 563 854 595 561 813 1318 - - 1277 - - Stage 1 810 738 - 777 713 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 776 713 - 812 737 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 588 562 854 593 560 813 1318 - - 1277 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 588 562 - 593 560 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 809 737 - 777 713 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 772 713 - 810 735 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.22 9.96 0 0.12

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1318 - - 854 731 27 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.001 0.006 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.2 10 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
174
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 1 0 1 2 8 0 0 0 2 0 6
Future Vol, veh/h 2 1 0 1 2 8 0 0 0 2 0 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 1 0 1 2 9 0 0 0 2 0 7
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 11 0 0 1 0 0 14 14 7
Stage 1 - - - - - - 9 9 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 5 5 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1589 - - 1602 - - 997 874 1067
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1007 882 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1010 885 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1589 - - 1602 - - 995 0 1067
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 995 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1005 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1009 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 4.85 0.66 8.46

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1200 - - 141 - - 1048
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.008
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 0 - 7.2 0 - 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0
175
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 5 2 1 7 234 1 4 195 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 8 5 2 1 7 234 1 4 195 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 10 6 2 1 8 279 1 5 232 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 540 540 234 538 541 279 236 0 0 280 0 0 Stage 1 243 243 - 296 296 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 296 296 - 242 245 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.14 6.54 6.24 7.14 6.54 6.24 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.036 3.336 3.536 4.036 3.336 2.236 - - 2.236 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 450 446 800 451 445 755 1320 - - 1271 - - Stage 1 756 701 - 708 665 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 708 664 - 757 699 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 441 441 800 441 440 755 1320 - - 1271 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 441 441 - 441 440 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 752 698 - 703 660 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 699 659 - 745 696 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.55 12.91 0.22 0.16

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 52 - - 800 465 36 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.012 0.02 0.004 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - 9.6 12.9 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
176
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 57 37 33 20 9 14 17 20 9 13 0
Future Vol, veh/h 7 57 37 33 20 9 14 17 20 9 13 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - - 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 66 43 38 23 10 16 20 23 10 15 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 34 0 0 109 0 0 189 193 68 197 230 29 Stage 1 - - - - - - 83 83 - 105 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 106 110 - 92 125 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1577 - - 1481 - - 771 702 996 761 670 1046 Stage 1 - - - - - - 926 826 - 901 808 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 899 804 - 915 792 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1576 - - 1480 - - 730 679 994 699 647 1045 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 730 679 - 699 647 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 920 821 - 876 786 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 859 782 - 867 787 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.51 3.99 9.75 10.5

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 730 819 197 - - 902 - - 699 647
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.052 0.005 - - 0.026 - - 0.015 0.023 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10 9.6 7.3 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.2 10.7
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0 0.1
177
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 49 0 29 0 0 0 47 148 0 1 161 49
Future Vol, veh/h 49 0 29 0 0 0 47 148 0 1 161 49
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 54 0 32 0 0 0 52 164 0 1 179 54
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 477 477 206 450 504 164 233 0 0 164 0 0 Stage 1 208 208 - 269 269 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 269 269 - 181 236 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 497 485 832 518 469 877 1328 - - 1408 - - Stage 1 791 728 - 735 685 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 735 685 - 818 708 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 475 464 832 476 448 877 1328 - - 1408 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 475 464 - 476 448 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 791 727 - 703 655 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 703 655 - 786 708 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.53 0 1.89 0.04

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 434 - - 565 - 8 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - 0.153 - 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 12.5 0 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.5 - 0 - -
178
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 31 26 50 39 56 7 7 48 44 7 11
Future Vol, veh/h 31 31 26 50 39 56 7 7 48 44 7 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mvmt Flow 33 33 28 54 42 60 8 8 52 47 8 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 103 0 0 62 0 0 254 312 35 255 279 43 Stage 1 - - - - - - 101 101 - 150 150 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 153 211 - 105 129 -
Critical Hdwy 4.11 - - 4.11 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 - - 2.209 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1495 - - 1547 - - 701 605 1040 700 630 1030 Stage 1 - - - - - - 908 813 - 854 775 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 852 730 - 903 791 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1494 - - 1546 - - 643 568 1038 617 592 1029 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 643 568 - 617 592 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 886 794 - 822 745 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 802 702 - 830 772 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.63 2.56 9.36 10.93

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 893 900 - - 1011 - - 613 1029
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 0.022 - - 0.035 - - 0.089 0.011 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.4 7.5 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.4 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.3 0
179
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 149 126 37 8 0 224 0 103 50 223 148 0 Future Vol, veh/h 149 126 37 8 0 224 0 103 50 223 148 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 164 138 41 9 0 246 0 113 55 245 163 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 18.1 13.1 12.6 15

HCM LOS C B B B
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 48% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 67% 0% 40% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 33% 97% 12% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 153 232 312 223 148
LT Vol 0 8 149 223 0
Through Vol 103 0 126 0 148
RT Vol 50 224 37 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 168 255 343 245 163
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.308 0.417 0.595 0.492 0.304
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.585 5.887 6.245 7.23 6.72
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 545 609 579 497 535
Service Time 4.639 3.934 4.285 4.976 4.465
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.308 0.419 0.592 0.493 0.305
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.6 13.1 18.1 16.8 12.4
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 2.1 3.9 2.7 1.3

Page 7 ends

180
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 39 3 86 124 349 0 0 336 186
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 39 3 86 124 349 0 0 336 186
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 41 3 91 132 371 0 0 357 198
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 995 1190 373 555 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 635 635 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 359 555 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 272 187 673 1015 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 528 472 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 706 513 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 236 0 672 1015 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 236 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 459 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 705 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 17.37 2.38 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1015 - 426 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 - 0.32 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.1 - 17.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 1.4 - -

Page 8 ends

181
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 354 55 6 184 49 9
Future Vol, veh/h 354 55 6 184 49 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 385 60 7 200 53 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 445 0 628 415
Stage 1 - - - - 415 -
Stage 2 - - - - 213 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1116 - 447 638
Stage 1 - - - - 667 -
Stage 2 - - - - 822 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1116 - 444 638
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 444 -
Stage 1 - - - - 667 -
Stage 2 - - - - 818 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.26 13.92

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 466 1116 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.006 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 13.9 8.2 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

182
Section , Item A
Existing PM HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
Existing PM Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.9
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 194 21 165 199 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 194 21 165 199 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 204 22 174 209 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 174 - 0 -
Stage 1 174 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 814 0 - 0
Stage 1 854 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 814 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 814 - - -
Stage 1 854 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.9 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 814 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.251 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.9 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 -

Page 10 ends

183
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix D Existing Plus Project Synchro Reports
184
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 7 0 17 1 163 5 7 86 0
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 0 7 0 17 1 163 5 7 86 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 8 0 19 1 183 6 8 97 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 298 303 97 301 301 186 97 0 0 189 0 0 Stage 1 112 112 - 188 188 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 185 191 - 112 112 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.85 6.55 7.45 6.85 6.55 4.45 - - 4.45 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.815 4.315 3.615 3.815 4.315 3.615 2.515 - - 2.515 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 594 559 876 592 561 778 1314 - - 1210 - - Stage 1 818 743 - 743 686 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 746 684 - 818 743 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 575 554 876 587 556 778 1314 - - 1210 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 575 554 - 587 556 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 813 738 - 742 686 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 727 684 - 813 738 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.27 10.26 0.05 0.6

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 11 - - 575 711 135 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.002 0.038 0.007 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - 11.3 10.3 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
185
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 7 2 1 3 7 0 0 0 21 0 3
Future Vol, veh/h 1 7 2 1 3 7 0 0 0 21 0 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 11 3 2 5 11 0 0 0 33 0 5
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 16 0 0 14 0 0 27 30 10
Stage 1 - - - - - - 13 13 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 14 17 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 - - 1604 - - 988 862 1071
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1010 884 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1009 881 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 - - 1604 - - 986 0 1071
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 986 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1009 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1008 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.72 0.66 8.73

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 172 - - 144 - - 986 1071
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.033 0.004
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.2 0 - 7.2 0 - 8.8 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 0
186
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 22 0 0 1 1 156 4 2 141 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 22 0 0 1 1 156 4 2 141 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 1 0 25 0 0 1 1 175 4 2 158 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 341 346 159 343 344 178 160 0 0 180 0 0 Stage 1 163 163 - 180 180 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 178 182 - 163 164 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 607 573 878 606 574 858 1402 - - 1378 - - Stage 1 832 757 - 815 745 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 817 743 - 832 757 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 605 571 878 587 572 858 1402 - - 1378 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 605 571 - 587 572 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 830 756 - 814 744 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 816 743 - 807 755 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.31 9.2 0.05 0.11

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 11 - - 862 858 25 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.03 0.001 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - 9.3 9.2 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
187
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 35 22 21 54 7 63 37 53 9 14 22
Future Vol, veh/h 16 35 22 21 54 7 63 37 53 9 14 22
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 18 40 25 24 61 8 72 42 60 10 16 25
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 72 0 0 68 0 0 197 199 44 210 216 65 Stage 1 - - - - - - 79 79 - 112 112 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 118 120 - 98 104 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1509 - - 1515 - - 755 691 1018 740 676 990 Stage 1 - - - - - - 922 823 - 886 797 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 879 791 - 901 803 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1510 - - 695 668 1014 633 653 986 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 695 668 - 633 653 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 908 811 - 869 782 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 825 775 - 793 791 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.63 1.9 10.26 9.84

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 695 836 565 - - 504 - - 633 823
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.103 0.122 0.012 - - 0.016 - - 0.016 0.05 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.8 9.9 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.8 9.6
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0 0.2
188
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 97 0 29 0 0 2 20 192 0 1 159 39
Future Vol, veh/h 97 0 29 0 0 2 20 192 0 1 159 39
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 108 0 32 0 0 2 22 213 0 1 177 43
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 459 460 199 438 482 214 221 0 0 214 0 0 Stage 1 202 202 - 259 259 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 258 259 - 179 223 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 507 493 834 524 480 818 1331 - - 1338 - - Stage 1 793 729 - 739 688 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 740 688 - 816 713 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 495 483 833 493 469 817 1329 - - 1337 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 495 483 - 493 469 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 792 728 - 725 675 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 724 675 - 784 712 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.85 9.42 0.73 0.04

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 170 - - 546 817 9 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - 0.256 0.003 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 13.8 9.4 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1 0 0 - -
189
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/20/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 22 3 47 10 33 6 17 107 104 11 15
Future Vol, veh/h 0 22 3 47 10 33 6 17 107 104 11 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 23 3 48 10 34 6 18 110 107 11 15
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 49 0 0 31 0 0 141 174 28 144 143 15 Stage 1 - - - - - - 28 28 - 112 112 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 113 146 - 31 31 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1582 - - 829 719 1048 826 748 1064 Stage 1 - - - - - - 990 872 - 893 803 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 892 776 - 985 869 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1550 - - 1574 - - 776 690 1043 694 718 1059 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 776 690 - 694 718 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 985 868 - 860 773 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 839 748 - 863 865 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.84 9.34 10.91

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 963 1550 - - 1484 - - 696 1059
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.139 - - - 0.031 - - 0.17 0.015
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.3 0 - - 7.4 0 - 11.2 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.6 0

Page 6 ends

190
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.9
Intersection LOS D
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 189 98 17 4 0 378 0 269 35 215 95 0
Future Vol, veh/h 189 98 17 4 0 378 0 269 35 215 95 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 201 104 18 4 0 402 0 286 37 229 101 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 26.7 30 26.7 19.2

HCM LOS D D D C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 1% 62% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 32% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 99% 6% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 304 382 304 215 95
LT Vol 0 4 189 215 0
Through Vol 269 0 98 0 95
RT Vol 35 378 17 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 323 406 323 229 101
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.694 0.775 0.694 0.552 0.229
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.721 6.869 7.721 8.682 8.165
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 466 524 466 414 438
Service Time 5.816 4.959 5.815 6.477 5.96
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.693 0.775 0.693 0.553 0.231
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 26.7 30 26.7 21.8 13.4
HCM Lane LOS D D D C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 5.2 7 5.2 3.2 0.9

Page 7 ends

191
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.8
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 20 1 150 256 577 0 0 285 227
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 20 1 150 256 577 0 0 285 227
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 22 1 161 275 620 0 0 306 244
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1479 1722 622 551 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1171 1171 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 308 551 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 138 89 486 1019 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 295 267 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 745 516 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 101 0 485 1019 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 101 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 215 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 744 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 28.07 3.02 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1019 - 335 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.27 - 0.549 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 - 28.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - 3.1 - -

Page 8 ends

192
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 309 43 0 270 98 12
Future Vol, veh/h 309 43 0 270 98 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 329 46 0 287 104 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 374 0 640 353
Stage 1 - - - - 352 -
Stage 2 - - - - 288 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1179 - 438 689
Stage 1 - - - - 710 -
Stage 2 - - - - 759 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1179 - 438 688
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 438 -
Stage 1 - - - - 710 -
Stage 2 - - - - 758 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 15.6

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 456 1179 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.257 - - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 15.6 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

193
Section , Item A
Existing AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/20/2026
Existing AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.6
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 265 33 125 199 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 265 33 125 199 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 282 35 133 212 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 133 - 0 -
Stage 1 133 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 856 0 - 0
Stage 1 888 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 856 - - -
Stage 1 888 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.26 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 856 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.329 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.3 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 -

Page 10 ends

194
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 4 1 17 0 164 8 24 127 2
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 4 1 17 0 164 8 24 127 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 4 1 18 0 176 9 26 137 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 366 374 138 369 371 181 139 0 0 185 0 0 Stage 1 189 189 - 181 181 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 177 185 - 188 190 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.34 6.74 6.44 7.34 6.74 6.44 4.34 - - 4.34 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.716 4.216 3.516 3.716 4.216 3.516 2.416 - - 2.416 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 551 523 855 549 526 808 1320 - - 1268 - - Stage 1 764 704 - 773 710 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 776 707 - 765 703 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 526 512 855 536 514 808 1320 - - 1268 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 526 512 - 536 514 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 747 689 - 773 710 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 758 707 - 747 688 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.21 10.15 0 1.24

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1320 - - 855 723 281 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.001 0.033 0.02 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.2 10.1 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0.1 - -
195
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 4 0 1 7 25 0 0 0 12 0 6
Future Vol, veh/h 2 4 0 1 7 25 0 0 0 12 0 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 4 0 1 8 27 0 0 0 13 0 7
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 35 0 0 4 0 0 32 32 21
Stage 1 - - - - - - 23 23 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 9 9 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1598 - - 974 855 1048
Stage 1 - - - - - - 992 870 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1007 882 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1557 - - 1598 - - 972 0 1048
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 972 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 990 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1006 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.44 0.22 8.66

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 600 - - 47 - - 972 1048
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.013 0.006
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 0 - 7.3 0 - 8.8 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0 0
196
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 21 5 2 1 29 234 1 4 195 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 21 5 2 1 29 234 1 4 195 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 25 6 2 1 35 279 1 5 232 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 592 592 234 590 593 279 236 0 0 280 0 0 Stage 1 243 243 - 348 348 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 349 349 - 242 245 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.14 6.54 6.24 7.14 6.54 6.24 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.036 3.336 3.536 4.036 3.336 2.236 - - 2.236 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 415 416 800 416 416 755 1320 - - 1271 - - Stage 1 756 701 - 664 630 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 663 630 - 757 699 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 397 402 800 389 401 755 1320 - - 1271 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 397 402 - 389 401 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 752 698 - 643 611 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 639 611 - 731 696 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.64 13.82 0.86 0.16

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 198 - - 800 418 36 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.031 0.023 0.004 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 9.6 13.8 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
197
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 57 64 49 20 9 30 26 30 9 29 0
Future Vol, veh/h 7 57 64 49 20 9 30 26 30 9 29 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 66 74 56 23 10 34 30 34 10 33 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 34 0 0 140 0 0 235 230 68 234 293 24 Stage 1 - - - - - - 83 83 - 137 137 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 152 147 - 98 156 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1577 - - 1443 - - 720 670 996 720 618 1052 Stage 1 - - - - - - 926 826 - 867 783 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 850 775 - 909 768 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1576 - - 1442 - - 649 639 994 633 589 1051 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 649 639 - 633 589 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 920 821 - 831 751 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 780 744 - 840 763 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.4 4.77 10.27 11.31

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 649 790 197 - - 1278 - - 633 589
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.081 0.005 - - 0.039 - - 0.016 0.057 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.9 10 7.3 0 - 7.6 0 - 10.8 11.5
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0 0.2
198
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 0 29 0 0 0 47 148 0 1 161 65
Future Vol, veh/h 59 0 29 0 0 0 47 148 0 1 161 65
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 66 0 32 0 0 0 52 164 0 1 179 72
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 486 486 215 450 522 164 251 0 0 164 0 0 Stage 1 217 217 - 269 269 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 269 269 - 181 253 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 490 480 822 518 458 877 1308 - - 1408 - - Stage 1 783 721 - 735 685 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 735 685 - 818 696 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 468 458 822 475 437 877 1308 - - 1408 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 468 458 - 475 437 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 782 721 - 702 655 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 702 655 - 786 695 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.04 0 1.9 0.03

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 434 - - 545 - 7 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 - - 0.179 - 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.9 0 - 13 0 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.6 - 0 - -
199
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 31 26 66 39 56 7 7 57 44 7 11
Future Vol, veh/h 31 31 26 66 39 56 7 7 57 44 7 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 5 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mvmt Flow 33 33 28 71 42 60 8 8 61 47 8 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 107 0 0 66 0 0 293 354 43 298 322 47 Stage 1 - - - - - - 105 105 - 189 189 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 188 249 - 109 133 -
Critical Hdwy 4.11 - - 4.11 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 - - 2.209 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1490 - - 1542 - - 662 573 1030 657 597 1025 Stage 1 - - - - - - 903 810 - 815 746 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 816 702 - 899 788 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1483 - - 1535 - - 597 527 1020 560 549 1020 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 597 527 - 560 549 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 878 788 - 771 706 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 759 664 - 813 766 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.64 3.06 9.49 11.51

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 878 900 - - 1131 - - 558 1020
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.022 - - 0.046 - - 0.098 0.012 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 7.5 0 - 7.5 0 - 12.1 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.3 0
200
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.4
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 149 134 45 8 0 234 0 113 50 231 156 0 Future Vol, veh/h 149 134 45 8 0 234 0 113 50 231 156 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 164 147 49 9 0 257 0 124 55 254 171 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 20.2 14 13.4 16

HCM LOS C B B C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 45% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 69% 0% 41% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 31% 97% 14% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 163 242 328 231 156
LT Vol 0 8 149 231 0
Through Vol 113 0 134 0 156
RT Vol 50 234 45 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 179 266 360 254 171
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.339 0.449 0.64 0.522 0.328
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.808 6.08 6.395 7.409 6.898
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 527 590 562 487 521
Service Time 4.873 4.137 4.444 5.163 4.652
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.34 0.451 0.641 0.522 0.328
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 13.4 14 20.2 18 13
HCM Lane LOS B B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 2.3 4.5 3 1.4

Page 7 ends

201
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 39 3 86 134 358 0 0 352 186
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 39 3 86 134 358 0 0 352 186
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 41 3 91 143 381 0 0 374 198
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1042 1238 383 572 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 666 666 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 376 572 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 254 176 665 1000 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 511 457 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 694 504 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 218 0 663 1000 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 218 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 438 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 693 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.34 2.5 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1000 - 405 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.142 - 0.336 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.2 - 18.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - 1.5 - -

Page 8 ends

202
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 370 55 6 194 49 9
Future Vol, veh/h 370 55 6 194 49 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 402 60 7 211 53 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 462 0 656 432
Stage 1 - - - - 432 -
Stage 2 - - - - 224 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1099 - 430 623
Stage 1 - - - - 655 -
Stage 2 - - - - 813 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1099 - 428 623
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 428 -
Stage 1 - - - - 655 -
Stage 2 - - - - 808 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.25 14.31

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 450 1099 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.14 0.006 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.3 8.3 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

203
Section , Item A
Existing PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
Existing PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.1
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 204 21 165 215 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 204 21 165 215 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 215 22 174 226 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 174 - 0 -
Stage 1 174 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 814 0 - 0
Stage 1 854 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 814 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 814 - - -
Stage 1 854 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 814 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.264 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 -

Page 10 ends

204
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix D Near Term Synchro Reports
205
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 11 - - 575 711 135 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.002 0.038 0.007 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - 11.3 10.3 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
206
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 172 - - 144 - - 986 1071
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.033 0.004
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.2 0 - 7.2 0 - 8.8 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 0
207
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 22 0 0 1 7 156 4 2 141 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 22 0 0 1 7 156 4 2 141 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 1 0 25 0 0 1 8 175 4 2 158 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 354 359 159 356 357 178 160 0 0 180 0 0 Stage 1 163 163 - 193 193 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 191 196 - 163 164 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 595 563 878 593 564 858 1402 - - 1378 - - Stage 1 832 757 - 802 735 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 804 733 - 832 757 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 589 558 878 572 560 858 1402 - - 1378 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 589 558 - 572 560 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 830 756 - 797 730 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 798 729 - 807 755 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.32 9.2 0.32 0.11

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 75 - - 860 858 25 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.03 0.001 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - 9.3 9.2 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
208
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 55 22 22 60 8 63 37 54 12 14 26
Future Vol, veh/h 17 55 22 22 60 8 63 37 54 12 14 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 19 63 25 25 68 9 72 42 61 14 16 30
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 80 0 0 91 0 0 231 234 67 244 250 72 Stage 1 - - - - - - 104 104 - 121 121 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 127 130 - 123 129 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1499 - - 1486 - - 717 661 989 703 647 982 Stage 1 - - - - - - 894 803 - 876 790 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 869 783 - 874 784 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1494 - - 1482 - - 655 637 985 596 624 978 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 655 637 - 596 624 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 880 790 - 858 774 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 811 767 - 764 771 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.35 1.83 10.55 10.02

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 655 806 425 - - 483 - - 596 816
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.109 0.128 0.013 - - 0.017 - - 0.023 0.056 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.2 10.1 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 11.2 9.7
HCM Lane LOS B B A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 0.2
209
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 114 0 33 0 0 2 21 192 0 1 159 45
Future Vol, veh/h 114 0 33 0 0 2 21 192 0 1 159 45
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 127 0 37 0 0 2 23 213 0 1 177 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 465 466 203 440 491 214 228 0 0 214 0 0 Stage 1 205 205 - 261 261 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 260 261 - 179 230 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 503 490 831 522 474 818 1323 - - 1338 - - Stage 1 790 726 - 737 687 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 738 687 - 816 709 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 490 479 830 488 463 817 1322 - - 1337 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 490 479 - 488 463 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 789 725 - 722 672 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 721 672 - 779 707 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.53 9.42 0.77 0.04

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 177 - - 540 817 8 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - 0.303 0.003 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 14.5 9.4 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.3 0 0 - -
210
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 32 6 59 13 33 12 17 138 104 11 15
Future Vol, veh/h 0 32 6 59 13 33 12 17 138 104 11 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 33 6 61 13 34 12 18 142 107 11 15
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 52 0 0 44 0 0 179 212 38 182 184 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 38 38 - 140 140 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 141 174 - 42 44 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1553 - - 1564 - - 783 685 1034 780 710 1060 Stage 1 - - - - - - 977 863 - 863 781 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 862 755 - 973 858 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - 1557 - - 725 651 1029 625 675 1055 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 725 651 - 625 675 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 973 859 - 824 746 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 803 721 - 821 854 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 4.16 9.66 11.63

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 945 1546 - - 1475 - - 630 1055
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.182 - - - 0.039 - - 0.188 0.015
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 0 - - 7.4 0 - 12 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.7 0
211
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 37.3
Intersection LOS E
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 192 102 24 4 0 391 0 305 39 219 103 0 Future Vol, veh/h 192 102 24 4 0 391 0 305 39 219 103 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 204 109 26 4 0 416 0 324 41 233 110 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 36.9 44.9 42.8 22.3

HCM LOS E E E C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 1% 60% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 89% 0% 32% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 11% 99% 8% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 344 395 318 219 103
LT Vol 0 4 192 219 0
Through Vol 305 0 102 0 103
RT Vol 39 391 24 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 366 420 338 233 110
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.844 0.88 0.791 0.607 0.27
Departure Headway (Hd) 8.304 7.541 8.417 9.377 8.857
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 435 479 430 384 404
Service Time 6.395 5.63 6.51 7.171 6.651
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.841 0.877 0.786 0.607 0.272
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 42.8 44.9 36.9 25.8 14.9
HCM Lane LOS E E E D B
HCM 95th-tile Q 8.2 9.4 7 3.8 1.1

Page 7 ends

212
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.2
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 1 151 290 595 0 0 293 237
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 1 151 290 595 0 0 293 237
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 1 162 312 640 0 0 315 255
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1580 1833 642 570 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1263 1263 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 317 570 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 120 76 474 1003 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 266 241 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 738 505 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 82 0 473 1003 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 82 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 183 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 737 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 38.9 3.34 0

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 1003 - 287 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.311 - 0.66 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.2 - 38.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - E - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - 4.3 - -

Page 8 ends

213
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 321 43 0 283 98 12
Future Vol, veh/h 321 43 0 283 98 12
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 341 46 0 301 104 13
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 387 0 666 365
Stage 1 - - - - 364 -
Stage 2 - - - - 302 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1166 - 423 678
Stage 1 - - - - 701 -
Stage 2 - - - - 748 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1166 - 422 677
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 422 -
Stage 1 - - - - 701 -
Stage 2 - - - - 747 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 16.11

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 440 1166 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.266 - - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 16.1 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

214
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/20/2026
Near Term AM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.8
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 278 37 131 205 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 278 37 131 205 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 296 39 139 218 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 139 - 0 -
Stage 1 139 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 849 0 - 0
Stage 1 883 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 849 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 849 - - -
Stage 1 883 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.49 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 849 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.348 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.5 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 -

Page 10 ends

215
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out Mitigated 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term AM Build Out Mitigated 1 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated TS + Roundabout Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 192 102 24 4 0 391 0 305 39 219 103 0 Future Volume (vph) 192 102 24 4 0 391 0 305 39 219 103 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1786 1568 1746 1529 1845 1568 1752 1845 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1786 1568 795 1529 1845 1568 1752 1845 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 204 109 26 4 0 416 0 324 41 233 110 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 0 291 0 0 28 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 313 8 4 0 125 0 324 13 233 110 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 3 1 4 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 6 4 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.3 18.3 10.2 33.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.3 18.3 10.2 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 535 470 238 458 562 478 297 1014
v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.01 c0.13 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.00 0.01 0.08
v/c Ratio 0.59 0.02 0.02 0.27 0.58 0.03 0.78 0.11
Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 14.8 14.8 16.0 17.6 14.6 23.8 6.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 0.1 0.1 1.5 1.4 0.0 12.7 0.2
Delay (s) 22.5 14.8 14.9 17.5 19.0 14.6 36.6 6.7
Level of Service C B B B B B D A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 21.9 17.4 18.5 27.0
Approach LOS C B B C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 21.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
216
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
7: Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term AM Build Out Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.5
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 339 420 365 343
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 349 432 376 353
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 357 544 562 4
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 0 394 144 972
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 1 4 4 3
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 0.999 0.999 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.9 12.9 11.6 4.9
Approach LOS A B B A
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LR TR LT
Assumed Moves LTR LR TR LT
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 349 432 376 353
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 959 792 778 1374
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.971 0.972 0.971 0.971
Flow Entry, veh/h 339 420 365 343
Cap Entry, veh/h 930 770 755 1334
V/C Ratio 0.364 0.546 0.484 0.257
Control Delay, s/veh 7.9 12.9 11.6 4.9

LOS A B B A
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 3 3 1
217
Section , Item A
Near Term AM Build Out Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term AM Build Out Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.4
Intersection LOS B
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 0 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 0 189 952 570
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 0 193 971 581
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 348 971 0 346
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 579 0 348 818
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 1 0 4 4
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 13.3 12.2 12.3
Approach LOS - B B B
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LT TR
Assumed Moves LTR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 193 971 581
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 513 1380 970
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.979 0.981 0.981
Flow Entry, veh/h 189 952 570
Cap Entry, veh/h 502 1352 950
V/C Ratio 0.377 0.704 0.600
Control Delay, s/veh 13.3 12.2 12.3

LOS B B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 6 4
218
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1320 - - 855 723 281 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.001 0.033 0.02 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.2 10.1 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0.1 - -
219
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 600 - - 47 - - 972 1048
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.013 0.006
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 0 - 7.3 0 - 8.8 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0 0
220
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 198 - - 800 418 36 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.031 0.023 0.004 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 9.6 13.8 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
221
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 70 64 50 42 10 30 26 31 9 29 3
Future Vol, veh/h 11 70 64 50 42 10 30 26 31 9 29 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 13 80 74 57 48 11 34 30 36 10 33 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 61 0 0 155 0 0 287 282 82 286 345 49 Stage 1 - - - - - - 107 107 - 164 164 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 180 176 - 122 180 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1543 - - 1425 - - 666 626 977 666 578 1019 Stage 1 - - - - - - 899 807 - 838 762 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 822 754 - 883 750 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1541 - - 1424 - - 593 594 975 579 548 1018 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 593 594 - 579 548 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 890 799 - 802 730 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 749 721 - 810 743 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.56 3.74 10.65 11.63

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 593 754 244 - - 978 - - 579 573
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.087 0.008 - - 0.04 - - 0.018 0.064 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.4 10.2 7.4 0 - 7.6 0 - 11.3 11.7
HCM Lane LOS B B A A - A A - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 0.2
222
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 70 0 32 0 0 0 51 148 0 1 161 84
Future Vol, veh/h 70 0 32 0 0 0 51 148 0 1 161 84
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 78 0 36 0 0 0 57 164 0 1 179 93
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 506 506 226 459 552 164 272 0 0 164 0 0 Stage 1 228 228 - 278 278 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 278 278 - 181 274 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 476 468 811 511 440 877 1285 - - 1408 - - Stage 1 773 714 - 726 679 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 726 679 - 818 681 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 452 445 811 464 418 877 1285 - - 1408 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 452 445 - 464 418 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 772 713 - 691 646 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 691 646 - 782 680 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.74 0 2.03 0.03

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 461 - - 525 - 7 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 - - 0.216 - 0.001 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.9 0 - 13.7 0 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.8 - 0 - -
223
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 37 33 100 53 56 11 7 79 44 7 11
Future Vol, veh/h 31 37 33 100 53 56 11 7 79 44 7 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 5 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mvmt Flow 33 40 35 108 57 60 12 8 85 47 8 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 122 0 0 80 0 0 387 449 50 392 424 62 Stage 1 - - - - - - 111 111 - 277 277 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 276 337 - 115 147 -
Critical Hdwy 4.11 - - 4.11 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 - - 2.209 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1471 - - 1524 - - 573 507 1021 569 523 1006 Stage 1 - - - - - - 896 805 - 732 683 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 643 - 892 777 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1464 - - 1517 - - 501 453 1012 458 467 1001 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 501 453 - 458 467 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 871 782 - 672 628 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 661 591 - 786 755 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.31 3.61 9.89 12.96

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 840 821 - - 1176 - - 460 1001
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.124 0.023 - - 0.071 - - 0.119 0.012 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 7.5 0 - 7.6 0 - 13.9 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 0.4 0
224
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 21.3
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 160 146 74 8 0 243 0 139 52 239 174 0 Future Vol, veh/h 160 146 74 8 0 243 0 139 52 239 174 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 176 160 81 9 0 267 0 153 57 263 191 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 29.9 16.6 16.1 18.6

HCM LOS D C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 3% 42% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 73% 0% 38% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 27% 97% 19% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 191 251 380 239 174
LT Vol 0 8 160 239 0
Through Vol 139 0 146 0 174
RT Vol 52 243 74 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 210 276 418 263 191
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.434 0.514 0.779 0.582 0.397
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.447 6.711 6.841 7.98 7.466
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 485 541 535 454 484
Service Time 5.478 4.727 4.841 5.695 5.181
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.433 0.51 0.781 0.579 0.395
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 16.1 16.6 29.9 21.2 15
HCM Lane LOS C C D C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.2 2.9 7.1 3.6 1.9

Page 7 ends

225
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 49 3 88 156 382 0 0 368 192
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 49 3 88 156 382 0 0 368 192
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 52 3 94 166 406 0 0 391 204
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1132 1334 408 596 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 738 738 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 393 596 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 225 154 643 981 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 473 424 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 682 492 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 186 0 642 981 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 186 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 393 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 680 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 23.36 2.73 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 981 - 342 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.169 - 0.435 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.4 - 23.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 2.1 - -

Page 8 ends

226
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 392 55 6 203 49 9
Future Vol, veh/h 392 55 6 203 49 9
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 426 60 7 221 53 10
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 486 0 690 456
Stage 1 - - - - 456 -
Stage 2 - - - - 234 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1077 - 411 604
Stage 1 - - - - 638 -
Stage 2 - - - - 805 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1077 - 409 604
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 409 -
Stage 1 - - - - 638 -
Stage 2 - - - - 800 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.24 14.8

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 430 1077 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.147 0.006 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 14.8 8.4 - - -
HCM Lane LOS B A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

227
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
Near Term PM Build Out Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.2
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 213 23 168 234 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 213 23 168 234 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 224 24 177 246 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 177 - 0 -
Stage 1 177 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 811 0 - 0
Stage 1 851 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 811 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 811 - - -
Stage 1 851 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.13 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 811 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.277 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 -

Page 10 ends

228
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out Mitigated 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term PM Build Out Mitigated 1 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated TS + Roundabout Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 160 146 74 8 0 243 0 139 52 239 174 0 Future Volume (vph) 160 146 74 8 0 243 0 139 52 239 174 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1815 1583 1766 1546 1863 1546 1770 1863 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1815 1583 921 1546 1863 1546 1770 1863 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 160 81 9 0 267 0 153 57 263 191 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 44 0 0 146 0 0 49 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 336 37 9 0 121 0 153 8 263 191 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA
Protected Phases 6 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 8.9 8.9 10.5 23.9 Effective Green, g (s) 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 8.9 8.9 10.5 23.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 819 714 415 698 276 229 309 742
v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.15 0.10
v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.41 0.05 0.02 0.17 0.55 0.04 0.85 0.26
Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 9.2 9.1 9.8 23.7 21.9 24.0 12.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.4 0.1 19.6 0.2
Delay (s) 12.6 9.4 9.2 10.3 26.1 21.9 43.6 12.3
Level of Service B A A B C C D B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.0 10.3 25.0 30.4
Approach LOS B B C C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 19.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
229
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term PM Build Out Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.0
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 417 276 210 454
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 426 281 214 463
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 472 336 611 9
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 0 489 287 608
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 2 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.0 6.7 8.4 5.7
Approach LOS B A A A
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LR TR LT
Assumed Moves LTR LR TR LT
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 426 281 214 463
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 853 980 740 1367
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.978 0.982 0.981 0.981
Flow Entry, veh/h 417 276 210 454
Cap Entry, veh/h 834 962 726 1341
V/C Ratio 0.500 0.287 0.289 0.339
Control Delay, s/veh 11.0 6.7 8.4 5.7

LOS B A A A
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 1 1 2
230
Section , Item A
Near Term PM Build Out Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 Near Term PM Build Out Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 0 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 0 149 572 595
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 0 152 583 607
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 452 583 0 225
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 380 0 452 510
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 7.0 6.7 10.2
Approach LOS - A A B
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LT TR
Assumed Moves LTR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 152 583 607
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 761 1380 1097
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.981
Flow Entry, veh/h 149 572 595
Cap Entry, veh/h 746 1353 1075
V/C Ratio 0.200 0.423 0.554
Control Delay, s/veh 7.0 6.7 10.2

LOS A A B
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 2 4
231
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix D Year 2046 No Project Synchro Reports
232
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 192 3 2 102 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 192 3 2 102 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Mvmt Flow 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 209 3 2 111 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 328 332 111 330 330 210 111 0 0 212 0 0 Stage 1 115 115 - 215 215 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 213 216 - 115 115 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.85 6.55 7.45 6.85 6.55 4.45 - - 4.45 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.815 4.315 3.615 3.815 4.315 3.615 2.515 - - 2.515 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 566 538 860 565 539 753 1297 - - 1185 - - Stage 1 815 741 - 718 668 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 720 666 - 815 741 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 564 536 860 563 537 753 1297 - - 1185 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 564 536 - 563 537 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 814 739 - 717 666 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 718 665 - 814 739 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.41 0 0.08 0.15

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 18 - - 564 - 35 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.004 - 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 11.4 0 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - 0 - -
233
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 3 3 2 3 3 0 0 0 8 0 3
Future Vol, veh/h 2 3 3 2 3 3 0 0 0 8 0 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 3 3 2 3 3 0 0 0 9 0 3
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 7 0 0 7 0 0 17 20 5
Stage 1 - - - - - - 9 9 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 8 11 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1614 - - 1614 - - 1001 874 1078
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1014 888 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1015 887 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1614 - - 1614 - - 999 0 1078
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 999 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1012 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1014 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.81 1.81 8.57

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 409 - - 409 - - 1019
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.012
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.2 0 - 7.2 0 - 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0
234
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 3 0 0 2 2 184 5 3 167 2
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 3 0 0 2 2 184 5 3 167 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 0 3 0 0 2 2 200 5 3 182 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 393 399 183 395 397 203 184 0 0 205 0 0 Stage 1 189 189 - 207 207 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 204 210 - 188 190 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 561 534 852 559 536 830 1373 - - 1348 - - Stage 1 806 738 - 788 725 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 791 723 - 807 737 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 557 532 852 555 533 830 1373 - - 1348 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 557 532 - 555 533 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 804 736 - 787 724 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 787 722 - 802 735 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 10.16 9.35 0.08 0.13

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 19 - - 703 830 31 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.008 0.003 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - 10.2 9.3 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
235
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 42 17 19 64 9 46 28 46 11 11 26
Future Vol, veh/h 19 42 17 19 64 9 46 28 46 11 11 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 21 46 18 21 70 10 50 30 50 12 12 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 82 0 0 67 0 0 208 214 50 217 222 74 Stage 1 - - - - - - 90 90 - 114 114 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 118 124 - 103 108 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1496 - - 1515 - - 743 679 1010 733 671 980 Stage 1 - - - - - - 910 815 - 884 795 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 879 788 - 895 800 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1492 - - 1511 - - 686 656 1006 644 648 976 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 686 656 - 644 648 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 894 801 - 869 782 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 828 774 - 806 786 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.81 1.53 10.1 9.74

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 686 837 561 - - 412 - - 644 849
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 0.096 0.014 - - 0.014 - - 0.019 0.047 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.7 9.8 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.7 9.5
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 0.1
236
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 98 0 35 0 0 3 24 227 0 2 188 41
Future Vol, veh/h 98 0 35 0 0 3 24 227 0 2 188 41
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 107 0 38 0 0 3 26 247 0 2 204 45
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 531 532 228 509 554 248 250 0 0 248 0 0 Stage 1 232 232 - 300 300 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 299 300 - 209 254 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 454 449 804 470 436 784 1298 - - 1301 - - Stage 1 764 707 - 703 660 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 704 660 - 787 691 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 441 437 803 436 424 783 1297 - - 1299 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 441 437 - 436 424 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 762 705 - 686 644 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 684 644 - 748 689 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 15.1 9.62 0.75 0.07

HCM LOS C A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 172 - - 500 783 15 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - 0.289 0.004 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 15.1 9.6 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.2 0 0 - -
237
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 4 50 12 39 8 21 110 123 13 18
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 4 50 12 39 8 21 110 123 13 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 28 4 54 13 42 9 23 120 134 14 20
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 60 0 0 38 0 0 162 202 33 166 164 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 127 127 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 129 169 - 40 38 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1543 - - 1573 - - 803 694 1040 798 728 1060 Stage 1 - - - - - - 983 867 - 877 791 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 875 759 - 975 864 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1536 - - 1565 - - 741 662 1035 655 695 1055 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 741 662 - 655 695 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 978 863 - 842 759 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 812 728 - 840 860 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.65 9.59 11.63

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 934 1536 - - 1452 - - 658 1055
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.162 - - - 0.035 - - 0.225 0.019
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.6 0 - - 7.4 0 - 12 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.9 0.1
238
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 72.6
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 223 112 18 5 0 429 0 301 42 251 109 0 Future Vol, veh/h 223 112 18 5 0 429 0 301 42 251 109 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 242 122 20 5 0 466 0 327 46 273 118 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 71.9 111.4 65.5 33.1

HCM LOS F F F D
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 1% 63% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 32% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 99% 5% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 343 434 353 251 109
LT Vol 0 5 223 251 0
Through Vol 301 0 112 0 109
RT Vol 42 429 18 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 373 472 384 273 118
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.944 1.125 0.973 0.759 0.313
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.705 8.585 9.665 10.584 10.06
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 377 425 380 344 360
Service Time 7.705 6.585 7.665 8.284 7.76
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.989 1.111 1.011 0.794 0.328
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 65.5 111.4 71.9 40 17.3
HCM Lane LOS F F F E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 10.2 17 11 6 1.3

Page 7 ends

239
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 2 177 286 664 0 0 330 268
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 2 177 286 664 0 0 330 268
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 2 192 311 722 0 0 359 291
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1704 1993 724 650 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1343 1343 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 361 650 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 101 60 426 936 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 243 220 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 705 465 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 67 0 425 936 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 67 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 162 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 704 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 65.39 3.23 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 936 - 260 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.332 - 0.85 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.7 - 65.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 - 7 - -

Page 8 ends

240
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 359 51 0 302 116 15
Future Vol, veh/h 359 51 0 302 116 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 390 55 0 328 126 16
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 446 0 747 419
Stage 1 - - - - 418 -
Stage 2 - - - - 329 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1109 - 379 632
Stage 1 - - - - 662 -
Stage 2 - - - - 727 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1109 - 379 631
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 379 -
Stage 1 - - - - 662 -
Stage 2 - - - - 726 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 19.06

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 397 1109 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.359 - - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 19.1 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

241
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
2046 AM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.1
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 296 39 148 229 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 296 39 148 229 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 322 42 161 249 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 161 - 0 -
Stage 1 161 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 825 0 - 0
Stage 1 863 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 825 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 825 - - -
Stage 1 863 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.12 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 825 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.39 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.1 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 -

Page 10 ends

242
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project Mitigated 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM No Project Mitigated 1 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated TS + Roundabout Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 223 112 18 5 0 429 0 301 42 251 109 0 Future Volume (vph) 223 112 18 5 0 429 0 301 42 251 109 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1785 1568 1748 1529 1845 1568 1752 1845 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1785 1568 744 1529 1845 1568 1752 1845 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 242 122 20 5 0 466 0 327 46 273 118 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 303 0 0 35 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 364 7 5 0 163 0 327 12 273 118 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 1 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 6 4 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 15.0 15.0 10.5 30.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 15.0 15.0 10.5 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 624 548 260 535 461 392 306 922
v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.01 c0.16 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.58 0.01 0.02 0.30 0.71 0.03 0.89 0.13
Uniform Delay, d1 15.9 12.7 12.8 14.2 20.5 17.0 24.2 8.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 5.0 0.0 26.1 0.1
Delay (s) 19.9 12.8 12.9 15.7 25.5 17.0 50.3 8.1
Level of Service B B B B C B D A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 19.5 15.6 24.4 37.5
Approach LOS B B C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 23.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
243
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM No Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.5
Intersection LOS B
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 384 471 373 391
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 396 485 384 403
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 408 586 656 5
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 0 454 148 1066
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 1 1 3 3
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 16.3 14.0 5.3
Approach LOS A C B A
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LR TR LT
Assumed Moves LTR LR TR LT
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 396 485 384 403
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 910 759 707 1373
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.971 0.971 0.972 0.971
Flow Entry, veh/h 384 471 373 391
Cap Entry, veh/h 883 737 687 1333
V/C Ratio 0.435 0.639 0.544 0.294
Control Delay, s/veh 9.4 16.3 14.0 5.3

LOS A C B A
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 5 3 1
244
Section , Item A
2046 AM No Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM No Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.9
Intersection LOS B
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 0 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 0 220 1033 650
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 0 225 1053 663
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 393 1053 0 346
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 616 0 393 932
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 17.1 14.5 15.0
Approach LOS - C B B
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LT TR
Assumed Moves LTR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 225 1053 663
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 471 1380 970
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.978 0.981 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 220 1033 650
Cap Entry, veh/h 461 1353 950
V/C Ratio 0.477 0.763 0.684
Control Delay, s/veh 17.1 14.5 15.0

LOS C B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 8 6
245
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 194 0 5 150 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 194 0 5 150 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Mvmt Flow 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 211 0 5 163 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 388 386 165 385 388 211 166 0 0 211 0 0 Stage 1 176 176 - 211 211 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 212 211 - 174 177 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.34 6.74 6.44 7.34 6.74 6.44 4.34 - - 4.34 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.716 4.216 3.516 3.716 4.216 3.516 2.416 - - 2.416 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 533 515 826 536 514 777 1289 - - 1239 - - Stage 1 778 714 - 744 689 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 743 689 - 779 713 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 526 512 826 532 511 777 1289 - - 1239 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 526 512 - 532 511 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 774 711 - 744 689 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 736 689 - 773 709 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.37 10.49 0 0.25

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1289 - - 826 662 57 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.003 0.01 0.004 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.4 10.5 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0 0 - -
246
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 2 0 2 3 10 0 0 0 3 0 8
Future Vol, veh/h 3 2 0 2 3 10 0 0 0 3 0 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 3 2 0 2 3 11 0 0 0 3 0 9
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 14 0 0 2 0 0 22 22 9
Stage 1 - - - - - - 13 13 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 9 9 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1585 - - 1601 - - 987 866 1064
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1002 879 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1007 882 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1585 - - 1601 - - 984 0 1064
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 984 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1000 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1005 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 4.37 0.97 8.5

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1080 - - 208 - - 1041
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.001 - - 0.011
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 0 - 7.3 0 - 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0
247
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 10 6 3 2 9 276 2 5 230 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 10 6 3 2 9 276 2 5 230 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 11 7 3 2 10 300 2 5 250 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 584 585 252 582 586 301 254 0 0 302 0 0 Stage 1 263 263 - 321 321 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 321 322 - 261 265 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.14 6.54 6.24 7.14 6.54 6.24 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.036 3.336 3.536 4.036 3.336 2.236 - - 2.236 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 420 420 782 422 420 734 1299 - - 1247 - - Stage 1 738 687 - 687 648 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 686 648 - 740 686 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 410 414 782 410 414 734 1299 - - 1247 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 410 414 - 410 414 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 734 684 - 681 642 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 675 642 - 726 682 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.67 13.27 0.24 0.17

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 56 - - 782 447 38 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.014 0.027 0.004 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 9.7 13.3 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
248
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 68 44 39 24 11 17 21 24 11 16 0
Future Vol, veh/h 9 68 44 39 24 11 17 21 24 11 16 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 74 48 42 26 12 18 23 26 12 17 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 39 0 0 123 0 0 214 218 76 218 254 27 Stage 1 - - - - - - 94 94 - 112 112 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 120 124 - 106 142 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1571 - - 1464 - - 743 680 985 739 649 1048 Stage 1 - - - - - - 912 817 - 893 803 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 885 793 - 900 779 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1569 - - 1463 - - 696 654 983 668 625 1047 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 696 654 - 668 625 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 905 810 - 866 778 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 839 769 - 845 773 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.54 3.97 9.95 10.75

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 696 796 210 - - 1114 - - 668 625
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 0.061 0.006 - - 0.029 - - 0.018 0.028 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.3 9.8 7.3 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.5 10.9
HCM Lane LOS B A A A - A A - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 0.1
249
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 58 0 35 0 0 0 56 175 0 2 190 58
Future Vol, veh/h 58 0 35 0 0 0 56 175 0 2 190 58
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 63 0 38 0 0 0 61 190 0 2 207 63
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 554 554 238 523 586 190 270 0 0 190 0 0 Stage 1 242 242 - 312 312 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 312 312 - 211 274 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 441 439 798 463 421 849 1288 - - 1378 - - Stage 1 759 703 - 696 656 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 696 656 - 789 681 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 417 415 798 417 398 849 1288 - - 1378 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 417 415 - 417 398 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 757 702 - 660 621 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 660 621 - 750 680 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.83 0 1.92 0.06

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 436 - - 509 - 14 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 - - 0.199 - 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.9 0 - 13.8 0 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.7 - 0 - -
250
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 37 31 59 46 66 9 9 57 52 9 13
Future Vol, veh/h 37 37 31 59 46 66 9 9 57 52 9 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mvmt Flow 40 40 34 64 50 72 10 10 62 57 10 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 123 0 0 75 0 0 305 373 42 306 335 51 Stage 1 - - - - - - 122 122 - 179 179 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 183 251 - 127 155 -
Critical Hdwy 4.11 - - 4.11 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 - - 2.209 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1471 - - 1531 - - 650 559 1031 649 587 1020 Stage 1 - - - - - - 885 797 - 825 753 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 821 701 - 880 771 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1469 - - 1529 - - 583 518 1029 554 544 1019 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 583 518 - 554 544 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 859 773 - 787 718 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 762 669 - 792 748 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.65 2.57 9.68 11.73

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 850 900 - - 1011 - - 553 1019
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.096 0.027 - - 0.042 - - 0.12 0.014 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 7.5 0 - 7.5 0 - 12.4 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.4 0
251
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 21.6
Intersection LOS C
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 176 149 44 10 0 264 0 122 59 263 175 0 Future Vol, veh/h 176 149 44 10 0 264 0 122 59 263 175 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 191 162 48 11 0 287 0 133 64 286 190 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 29.1 17.8 15.7 20.2

HCM LOS D C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 4% 48% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 67% 0% 40% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 33% 96% 12% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 181 274 369 263 175
LT Vol 0 10 176 263 0
Through Vol 122 0 149 0 175
RT Vol 59 264 44 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 197 298 401 286 190
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.411 0.555 0.764 0.634 0.395
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.524 6.706 6.985 7.985 7.471
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 480 539 521 455 483
Service Time 5.561 4.723 4.985 5.703 5.189
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.41 0.553 0.77 0.629 0.393
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 15.7 17.8 29.1 23.6 15
HCM Lane LOS C C D C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2 3.4 6.7 4.3 1.9

Page 7 ends

252
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 46 4 102 147 412 0 0 396 220
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 46 4 102 147 412 0 0 396 220
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 50 4 111 160 448 0 0 430 239
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1200 1437 450 670 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 767 767 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 432 670 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 205 133 609 921 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 458 411 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 654 456 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 169 0 608 921 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 169 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 379 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 653 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 25.64 2.56 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 921 - 336 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.174 - 0.492 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 - 25.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 2.6 - -

Page 8 ends

253
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 417 65 8 217 58 11
Future Vol, veh/h 417 65 8 217 58 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 453 71 9 236 63 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 524 0 742 489
Stage 1 - - - - 489 -
Stage 2 - - - - 253 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1043 - 383 579
Stage 1 - - - - 617 -
Stage 2 - - - - 789 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1043 - 380 579
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 380 -
Stage 1 - - - - 617 -
Stage 2 - - - - 782 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.3 16

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 402 1043 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.187 0.008 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 16 8.5 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

254
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
2046 PM No Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 229 25 195 235 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 229 25 195 235 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 249 27 212 255 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 212 - 0 -
Stage 1 212 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 774 0 - 0
Stage 1 821 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 774 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 774 - - -
Stage 1 821 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.84 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 774 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.322 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.8 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 -

Page 10 ends

255
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project Mitigated 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM No Project Mitigated 1 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated TS + Roundabout Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 176 149 44 10 0 264 0 122 59 263 175 0 Future Volume (vph) 176 149 44 10 0 264 0 122 59 263 175 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1814 1583 1766 1546 1863 1583 1770 1863 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1814 1583 896 1546 1863 1583 1770 1863 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 191 162 48 11 0 287 0 133 64 286 190 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 26 0 0 155 0 0 55 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 353 22 11 0 132 0 133 9 286 190 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 6 4 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 8.4 8.4 10.5 23.4 Effective Green, g (s) 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 8.4 8.4 10.5 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 834 728 412 711 260 221 309 726
v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.01 c0.16 0.10
v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.09
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.19 0.51 0.04 0.93 0.26
Uniform Delay, d1 10.9 8.9 8.9 9.6 23.9 22.3 24.4 12.4
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.7 0.1 32.2 0.2
Delay (s) 12.4 8.9 9.0 10.1 25.6 22.4 56.6 12.6
Level of Service B A A B C C E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.0 10.1 24.6 39.0
Approach LOS B B C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 22.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
256
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM No Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.0
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 401 298 197 476
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 409 304 201 486
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 497 331 652 11
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 0 522 254 624
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 2 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 6.9 8.6 6.0
Approach LOS B A A A
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LR TR LT
Assumed Moves LTR LR TR LT
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 409 304 201 486
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 831 985 710 1364
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.982 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 401 298 197 476
Cap Entry, veh/h 814 965 697 1337
V/C Ratio 0.492 0.309 0.283 0.356
Control Delay, s/veh 11.1 6.9 8.6 6.0

LOS B A A A
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 1 1 2
257
Section , Item A
2046 PM No Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM No Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.3
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 0 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 0 165 608 669
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 0 168 620 683
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 490 620 0 218
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 411 0 490 570
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 7.6 7.1 11.6
Approach LOS - A A B
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LT TR
Assumed Moves LTR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 168 620 683
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 733 1380 1105
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.981 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 165 608 669
Cap Entry, veh/h 720 1353 1082
V/C Ratio 0.229 0.449 0.618
Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 7.1 11.6

LOS A A B
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 2 4
258
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix D Cumulative Year 2046 Plus Project
Synchro Reports
259
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 7 0 17 2 192 6 8 102 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 7 0 17 2 192 6 8 102 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Mvmt Flow 2 0 0 8 0 18 2 209 7 9 111 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 341 348 111 345 345 212 111 0 0 215 0 0 Stage 1 128 128 - 216 216 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 213 220 - 128 128 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.85 6.55 7.45 6.85 6.55 4.45 - - 4.45 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.45 5.85 - 6.45 5.85 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.815 4.315 3.615 3.815 4.315 3.615 2.515 - - 2.515 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 555 526 860 552 529 752 1297 - - 1182 - - Stage 1 802 731 - 717 666 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 720 664 - 802 731 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 536 521 860 547 524 752 1297 - - 1182 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 536 521 - 547 524 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 796 725 - 715 665 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 701 663 - 796 725 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.74 10.52 0.08 0.59

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 18 - - 536 678 131 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.004 0.038 0.007 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 11.7 10.5 8.1 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0 - -
260
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 8 3 2 4 8 0 0 0 23 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 2 8 3 2 4 8 0 0 0 23 0 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 2 9 3 2 4 9 0 0 0 25 0 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 13 0 0 12 0 0 26 29 9
Stage 1 - - - - - - 13 13 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 13 16 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.42 5.52 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1605 - - 1607 - - 989 864 1073
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1010 885 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1010 882 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1605 - - 1607 - - 987 0 1073
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 987 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 1008 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1008 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.11 1.03 8.69

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 263 - - 227 - - 987 1073
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.001 - - 0.025 0.004
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.2 0 - 7.2 0 - 8.7 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 0
261
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 23 0 0 2 8 184 5 3 167 2
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 23 0 0 2 8 184 5 3 167 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 0 25 0 0 2 9 200 5 3 182 2
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 407 412 183 408 410 203 184 0 0 205 0 0 Stage 1 189 189 - 220 220 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 217 223 - 188 190 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 550 525 852 548 527 830 1373 - - 1348 - - Stage 1 806 738 - 776 716 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 778 714 - 807 737 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 543 520 852 527 521 830 1373 - - 1348 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 543 520 - 527 521 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 804 736 - 770 710 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 771 708 - 781 735 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.57 9.35 0.31 0.13

HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 73 - - 815 830 31 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.033 0.003 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - 9.6 9.3 7.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0 0 - -
262
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 42 25 24 64 9 70 42 60 11 16 26
Future Vol, veh/h 19 42 25 24 64 9 70 42 60 11 16 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 21 46 27 26 70 10 76 46 65 12 17 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 82 0 0 76 0 0 221 224 50 236 242 74 Stage 1 - - - - - - 90 90 - 125 125 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 131 135 - 111 117 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1496 - - 1504 - - 728 669 1010 713 655 980 Stage 1 - - - - - - 910 815 - 872 787 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 865 779 - 887 793 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1492 - - 1500 - - 663 644 1006 598 630 976 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 663 644 - 598 630 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 894 800 - 854 770 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 805 763 - 770 779 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.65 1.84 10.52 10.02

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 663 817 561 - - 491 - - 598 807
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.136 0.014 - - 0.017 - - 0.02 0.057 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.1 10.1 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.1 9.7
HCM Lane LOS B B A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.5 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 0.2
263
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 112 0 35 0 0 3 24 227 0 2 188 46
Future Vol, veh/h 112 0 35 0 0 3 24 227 0 2 188 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 122 0 38 0 0 3 26 247 0 2 204 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 534 535 230 509 560 248 255 0 0 248 0 0 Stage 1 235 235 - 300 300 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 299 300 - 209 260 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.15 6.55 6.25 4.15 - - 4.15 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.15 5.55 - 6.15 5.55 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.545 4.045 3.345 2.245 - - 2.245 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 452 448 801 470 433 784 1292 - - 1301 - - Stage 1 762 705 - 703 660 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 704 660 - 787 688 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 439 435 801 436 421 783 1291 - - 1299 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 439 435 - 436 421 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 759 703 - 686 644 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 684 644 - 748 686 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 15.81 9.62 0.75 0.07

HCM LOS C A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 172 - - 492 783 15 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - 0.325 0.004 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 15.8 9.6 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.4 0 0 - -
264
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 26 4 55 12 39 8 21 124 123 13 18
Future Vol, veh/h 0 26 4 55 12 39 8 21 124 123 13 18
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 28 4 60 13 42 9 23 135 134 14 20
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 60 0 0 38 0 0 173 213 33 177 175 18 Stage 1 - - - - - - 33 33 - 138 138 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 140 180 - 40 38 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1543 - - 1573 - - 790 684 1040 785 718 1060 Stage 1 - - - - - - 983 867 - 866 783 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 863 750 - 975 864 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1536 - - 1565 - - 726 651 1035 631 683 1055 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 726 651 - 631 683 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 978 863 - 827 748 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 798 717 - 826 860 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 3.84 9.66 11.92

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 938 1536 - - 1478 - - 635 1055
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.177 - - - 0.038 - - 0.233 0.019
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 0 - - 7.4 0 - 12.4 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.9 0.1
265
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 85.1
Intersection LOS F
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 223 115 20 5 0 443 0 315 42 253 112 0 Future Vol, veh/h 223 115 20 5 0 443 0 315 42 253 112 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 242 125 22 5 0 482 0 342 46 275 122 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 79.8 135.8 77.7 35.1

HCM LOS F F F E
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 1% 62% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 88% 0% 32% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 12% 99% 6% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 357 448 358 253 112
LT Vol 0 5 223 253 0
Through Vol 315 0 115 0 112
RT Vol 42 443 20 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 388 487 389 275 122
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.991 1.191 0.999 0.775 0.326
Departure Headway (Hd) 9.975 8.807 9.993 10.888 10.363
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 369 414 366 336 349
Service Time 7.975 6.807 7.993 8.588 8.063
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.051 1.176 1.063 0.818 0.35
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 77.7 135.8 79.8 42.7 18
HCM Lane LOS F F F E C
HCM 95th-tile Q 11.4 19.2 11.6 6.2 1.4

Page 7 ends

266
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.7
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 2 177 300 678 0 0 335 268
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 2 177 300 678 0 0 335 268
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 2 192 326 737 0 0 364 291
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1755 2045 739 655 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 1389 1389 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 366 655 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 94 56 417 932 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 231 210 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 701 462 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 61 0 417 932 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 61 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 150 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 700 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 77.66 3.35 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 932 - 245 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.35 - 0.901 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 10.9 - 77.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.6 - 7.7 - -

Page 8 ends

267
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 364 51 0 316 116 15
Future Vol, veh/h 364 51 0 316 116 15
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 396 55 0 343 126 16
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 451 0 768 424
Stage 1 - - - - 423 -
Stage 2 - - - - 344 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.13 - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.227 - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1104 - 369 628
Stage 1 - - - - 658 -
Stage 2 - - - - 715 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1104 - 368 627
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 368 -
Stage 1 - - - - 658 -
Stage 2 - - - - 715 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0 19.65

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 386 1104 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.368 - - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 19.7 0 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.7 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

268
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
2046 AM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 8.4
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 310 39 148 234 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 310 39 148 234 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 337 42 161 254 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 161 - 0 -
Stage 1 161 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.44 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 825 0 - 0
Stage 1 863 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 825 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 825 - - -
Stage 1 863 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.34 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 825 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.408 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.3 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 -

Page 10 ends

269
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project Mitigated 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM Plus Project Mitigated 1 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated TS + Roundabout Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 223 115 20 5 0 443 0 315 42 253 112 0 Future Volume (vph) 223 115 20 5 0 443 0 315 42 253 112 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1786 1568 1748 1529 1845 1568 1752 1845 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1786 1568 730 1529 1845 1568 1752 1845 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 242 125 22 5 0 482 0 342 46 275 122 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 14 0 0 316 0 0 34 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 367 8 5 0 166 0 342 12 275 122 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 1 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 6 4 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 15.3 15.3 10.5 30.3 Effective Green, g (s) 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 15.3 15.3 10.5 30.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.26 0.26 0.18 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 616 540 251 527 470 399 306 931
v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.01 c0.16 0.07
v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.00 0.01 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.73 0.03 0.90 0.13
Uniform Delay, d1 16.2 12.9 13.0 14.4 20.4 16.8 24.2 7.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 0.0 0.1 1.6 5.6 0.0 27.0 0.1
Delay (s) 20.4 13.0 13.1 16.0 26.0 16.8 51.2 7.9
Level of Service C B B B C B D A
Approach Delay (s/veh) 20.0 16.0 24.9 37.9
Approach LOS B B C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
270
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM Plus Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.2
Intersection LOS B
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 389 487 388 397
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 401 501 399 409
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 414 601 661 5
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 0 459 154 1097
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 1 1 3 3
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 17.8 14.8 5.3
Approach LOS A C B A
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LR TR LT
Assumed Moves LTR LR TR LT
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 401 501 399 409
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 905 748 703 1373
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.971 0.972 0.972 0.971
Flow Entry, veh/h 389 487 388 397
Cap Entry, veh/h 878 727 683 1333
V/C Ratio 0.443 0.670 0.568 0.298
Control Delay, s/veh 9.5 17.8 14.8 5.3

LOS A C B A
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 5 4 1
271
Section , Item A
2046 AM Plus Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 AM Plus Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.9
Intersection LOS C
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 0 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 0 220 1063 655
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 0 225 1085 668
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 398 1085 0 362
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 632 0 398 948
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 18.1 15.6 15.8
Approach LOS - C C C
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LT TR
Assumed Moves LTR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 225 1085 668
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 456 1380 954
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.978 0.980 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 220 1063 655
Cap Entry, veh/h 446 1352 935
V/C Ratio 0.493 0.787 0.700
Control Delay, s/veh 18.1 15.6 15.8

LOS C C C
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 9 6
272
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
1: Clovis Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 4 2 18 0 194 8 25 150 3
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 4 2 18 0 194 8 25 150 3
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Mvmt Flow 0 0 2 4 2 20 0 211 9 27 163 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 431 439 165 433 436 215 166 0 0 220 0 0 Stage 1 219 219 - 215 215 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 212 220 - 217 221 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.34 6.74 6.44 7.34 6.74 6.44 4.34 - - 4.34 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.34 5.74 - 6.34 5.74 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.716 4.216 3.516 3.716 4.216 3.516 2.416 - - 2.416 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 498 480 826 497 482 772 1289 - - 1230 - - Stage 1 736 683 - 740 685 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 743 682 - 738 682 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 472 469 826 484 470 772 1289 - - 1230 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 472 469 - 484 470 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 718 666 - 740 685 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 721 682 - 718 665 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.37 10.59 0 1.12

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1289 - - 826 670 252 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.003 0.039 0.022 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 0 - - 9.4 10.6 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.1 0.1 - -
273
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
2: Private/Sunnyside Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 5 0 2 8 27 0 0 0 13 0 8
Future Vol, veh/h 3 5 0 2 8 27 0 0 0 13 0 8
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 3 5 0 2 9 29 0 0 0 14 0 9
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 38 0 0 5 0 0 40 40 23
Stage 1 - - - - - - 28 28 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 12 12 -
Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.15 - - 6.45 6.55 6.25
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.45 5.55 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.245 - - 3.545 4.045 3.345
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1553 - - 1596 - - 964 847 1045
Stage 1 - - - - - - 987 866 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1003 880 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1553 - - 1596 - - 961 0 1045
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 961 0 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 985 0 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 1002 0 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.75 0.39 8.68

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 675 - - 84 - - 961 1045
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.001 - - 0.015 0.008
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.3 0 - 7.3 0 - 8.8 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - - 0 0
274
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
3: Fowler Ave & Parlier Ave 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 23 6 3 2 31 276 2 5 230 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 23 6 3 2 31 276 2 5 230 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mvmt Flow 0 0 25 7 3 2 34 300 2 5 250 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 632 633 252 629 634 301 254 0 0 302 0 0 Stage 1 263 263 - 368 368 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 369 370 - 261 265 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.14 6.54 6.24 7.14 6.54 6.24 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.14 5.54 - 6.14 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.536 4.036 3.336 3.536 4.036 3.336 2.236 - - 2.236 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 390 395 782 392 394 734 1299 - - 1247 - - Stage 1 738 687 - 647 618 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 647 617 - 740 686 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 372 380 782 366 380 734 1299 - - 1247 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 372 380 - 366 380 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 734 684 - 627 598 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 621 598 - 712 682 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.76 14.12 0.79 0.17

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 180 - - 782 407 38 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 - - 0.032 0.029 0.004 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.8 0 - 9.8 14.1 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
275
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
4: Sunnyside Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 68 71 55 24 11 33 30 34 11 32 0
Future Vol, veh/h 9 68 71 55 24 11 33 30 34 11 32 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 100 - - 0 100 - - 150 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 74 77 60 26 12 36 33 37 12 35 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 39 0 0 152 0 0 258 253 76 257 318 27 Stage 1 - - - - - - 94 94 - 147 147 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 163 159 - 111 172 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1571 - - 1429 - - 696 650 985 696 598 1048 Stage 1 - - - - - - 912 817 - 856 776 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 839 767 - 894 757 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1569 - - 1427 - - 622 617 983 603 567 1047 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 622 617 - 603 567 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 905 810 - 819 742 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 765 733 - 820 751 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.44 4.66 10.48 11.59

HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 622 769 210 - - 1253 - - 603 567
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.058 0.09 0.006 - - 0.042 - - 0.02 0.061 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 11.1 10.1 7.3 0 - 7.6 0 - 11.1 11.8
HCM Lane LOS B B A A - A A - B B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 0.2
276
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
5: Fowler Avenue & South Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 0 35 0 0 0 56 175 0 2 190 74
Future Vol, veh/h 68 0 35 0 0 0 56 175 0 2 190 74
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 74 0 38 0 0 0 61 190 0 2 207 80
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 563 563 247 523 603 190 287 0 0 190 0 0 Stage 1 251 251 - 312 312 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 312 312 - 211 291 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 4.027 3.327 3.527 4.027 3.327 2.227 - - 2.227 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 435 434 790 463 412 849 1269 - - 1378 - - Stage 1 751 697 - 696 656 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 696 656 - 789 670 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 411 410 790 416 389 849 1269 - - 1378 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 411 410 - 416 389 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 749 696 - 659 621 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 659 621 - 750 668 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.48 0 1.93 0.06

HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 436 - - 491 - 13 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.048 - - 0.228 - 0.002 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8 0 - 14.5 0 7.6 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.9 - 0 - -
277
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
6: Sunnyside Avenue & Sumner Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 37 31 75 46 66 9 9 66 52 9 13
Future Vol, veh/h 37 37 31 75 46 66 9 9 66 52 9 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 5 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 150 - - 105 - - - - - 105
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mvmt Flow 40 40 34 82 50 72 10 10 72 57 10 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 127 0 0 79 0 0 344 415 50 349 377 55 Stage 1 - - - - - - 126 126 - 218 218 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 218 290 - 131 159 -
Critical Hdwy 4.11 - - 4.11 - - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 - - 2.209 - - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1466 - - 1526 - - 613 529 1021 608 556 1015 Stage 1 - - - - - - 881 794 - 787 724 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 787 674 - 875 768 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1459 - - 1518 - - 540 479 1011 502 504 1010 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 540 479 - 502 504 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 851 767 - 737 679 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 720 632 - 776 742 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.66 3.01 9.85 12.44

HCM LOS A B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 834 900 - - 1116 - - 502 1010
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.109 0.028 - - 0.054 - - 0.132 0.014 HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 7.5 0 - 7.5 0 - 13.3 8.6
HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 0.5 0
278
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th AWSC
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.1
Intersection LOS D
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 176 157 52 10 0 274 0 132 59 271 183 0 Future Vol, veh/h 176 157 52 10 0 274 0 132 59 271 183 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 191 171 57 11 0 298 0 143 64 295 199 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach SE NW NE SW
Opposing Approach NW SE SW NE
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SW NE SE NW
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NE SW NW SE
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 36.4 19.8 17.2 22.2

HCM LOS E C C C
Lane NELn1 NWLn1 SELn1 SWLn1 SWLn2
Vol Left, % 0% 4% 46% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 69% 0% 41% 0% 100%
Vol Right, % 31% 96% 14% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 191 284 385 271 183
LT Vol 0 10 176 271 0
Through Vol 132 0 157 0 183
RT Vol 59 274 52 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 208 309 418 295 199
Geometry Grp 4a 2 2 5 5
Degree of Util (X) 0.451 0.595 0.83 0.672 0.425
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.817 6.944 7.142 8.212 7.697
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 459 519 506 439 467
Service Time 5.884 5.005 5.195 5.968 5.453
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.453 0.595 0.826 0.672 0.426
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 17.2 19.8 36.4 26.3 16.1
HCM Lane LOS C C E D C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 3.8 8.2 4.8 2.1

Page 7 ends

279
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.3
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 46 4 102 157 421 0 0 412 220
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 46 4 102 157 421 0 0 412 220
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 65 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 50 4 111 171 458 0 0 448 239
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1249 1486 460 687 0 - - - 0
Stage 1 799 799 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 450 687 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 5.52 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 191 124 602 907 - 0 0 - -
Stage 1 443 398 - - - 0 0 - -
Stage 2 642 447 - - - 0 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 155 0 600 907 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 155 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 359 0 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 641 0 - - - - - - -
Approach NW NE SW
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 28.09 2.69 0

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NEL NETNWLn1 SWT SWR
Capacity (veh/h) 907 - 317 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.188 - 0.521 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 - 28.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 2.8 - -

Page 8 ends

280
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
9: Fresno Street & Fowler Avenue 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 433 65 8 227 58 11
Future Vol, veh/h 433 65 8 227 58 11
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 70 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 471 71 9 247 63 12
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 541 0 770 506
Stage 1 - - - - 506 -
Stage 2 - - - - 264 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1027 - 369 566
Stage 1 - - - - 606 -
Stage 2 - - - - 780 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1027 - 366 566
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 366 -
Stage 1 - - - - 606 -
Stage 2 - - - - 773 -
Approach SE NW NE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.29 16.5

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER
Capacity (veh/h) 388 1027 - - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.194 0.008 - - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 16.5 8.5 - - -
HCM Lane LOS C A - - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0 - - -

Page 9 ends

281
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project HCM 7th TWSC
10: Fowler Avenue & HWY 99 SB On Ramp 02/05/2026
2046 PM Plus Project Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.6
Movement NBL NBR SET SER NWL NWT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 239 25 195 251 0 0
Future Vol, veh/h 239 25 195 251 0 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - Free - Free - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 260 27 212 273 0 0
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1
Conflicting Flow All 212 - 0 -
Stage 1 212 - - -
Stage 2 0 - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.43 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.527 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 774 0 - 0
Stage 1 821 0 - 0
Stage 2 - 0 - 0
Platoon blocked, % -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 774 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 774 - - -
Stage 1 821 - - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Approach NB SE
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.98 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SET
Capacity (veh/h) 774 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.336 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12 -
HCM Lane LOS B -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.5 -

Page 10 ends

282
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project Mitigated 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM Plus Project Mitigated 1 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated TS + Roundabout Page 1
Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 176 157 52 10 0 274 0 132 59 271 183 0 Future Volume (vph) 176 157 52 10 0 274 0 132 59 271 183 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1815 1583 1766 1546 1863 1583 1770 1863 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1815 1583 875 1546 1863 1583 1770 1863 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 191 171 57 11 0 298 0 143 64 295 199 0
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 31 0 0 162 0 0 55 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 362 26 11 0 136 0 143 9 295 199 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA
Protected Phases 6 4 4 3 8
Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 27.3 27.3 27.3 27.3 8.7 8.7 10.5 23.7 Effective Green, g (s) 27.3 27.3 27.3 27.3 8.7 8.7 10.5 23.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 825 720 398 703 270 229 309 735
v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.01 c0.17 0.11
v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.02 0.01 0.09
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.04 0.03 0.19 0.53 0.04 0.95 0.27
Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 9.1 9.0 9.8 23.8 22.1 24.5 12.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.9 0.1 38.9 0.2
Delay (s) 12.8 9.2 9.2 10.4 25.6 22.1 63.4 12.5
Level of Service B A A B C C E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 12.3 10.3 24.5 42.9
Approach LOS B B C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 24.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
283
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
7: Sumner Ave/Merced Street & Fowler Avenue/HWY 99 SB Off Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM Plus Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 419 309 207 494
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 427 315 211 504
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 515 341 670 11
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 0 540 272 645
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 2 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.9 7.2 9.1 6.1
Approach LOS B A A A
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LR TR LT
Assumed Moves LTR LR TR LT
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 427 315 211 504
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 816 975 697 1364
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.982 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 419 309 207 494
Cap Entry, veh/h 800 956 684 1337
V/C Ratio 0.523 0.323 0.303 0.369
Control Delay, s/veh 11.9 7.2 9.1 6.1

LOS B A A A
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 1 1 2
284
Section , Item A
2046 PM Plus Project Mitigated 2 HCM 7th Roundabout
8: Merced Street & HWY 99 NB Off Ramp/HWY 99 NB On Ramp 02/05/2026 2046 PM Plus Project Mitigated 2 Synchro 12 Report
Mitigated Roundabout + Roundabout Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.7
Intersection LOS A
Approach SE NW NE SW
Entry Lanes 0 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 0 165 629 687
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 0 168 641 701
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 508 641 0 229
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 422 0 508 580
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 2 2
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 7.8 7.3 12.4
Approach LOS - A A B
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LT TR
Assumed Moves LTR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 168 641 701
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 718 1380 1092
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.981 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 165 629 687
Cap Entry, veh/h 705 1353 1070
V/C Ratio 0.234 0.465 0.642
Control Delay, s/veh 7.8 7.3 12.4

LOS A A B
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 3 5
285
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix E

APPENDIX E
Fresno COG Models
286
Section , Item A
0 0
0 0
1 0
5 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 10
0 1
1 0
0 0
00 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 67
23 10
29 SR 90 9
Sumner
Sumner
0 0
Sumner
Sumner
1 2

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
1 5

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
1 3
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
21 Manning
Manning
0 0
Manning
Manning
1 2

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
1 5
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
139

E PARLIER AVEE PARLIER AVE
5 26

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
20 13 S
S
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
199

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
8 10

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
1 3
Sumner
Sumner
0 1
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
58 15

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
1242
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
57 15
Sumner
Sumner
0 0
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
21 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
7 1
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
49 15
71 SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
71 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
7 1
SR 90 9
Fowler/99 0 SR 90 9
Sumner
Sumner
0 0
Fowler/99 0
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
0 Fowle
r
Fowle
r
11 17
Manning
Manning
14 9
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
11 17
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
11 17
F
owle
r
F
owle
r
1 1
1 7
20 13
20 13
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
17 11

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
23 E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
7 1

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
7 1
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
19 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
0 0
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
03 Merced Merced 91
Fowler
Fowler
1 9
Fowler/99 0
Merced Merced 91
Fowler 1 0
1 F
owle
r
9 9
0 9
0 9
Fowler/99 0
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
SR 90 9
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
Fowler/99 0
SR 99 0
0 0
2 0
Golden Sta 1
Golden Sta 0 Merced Merced 91
Merced Merced 91
0 0
Golden Sta 0
9 1
Golden Sta 3
6 0
Golden Sta 1
5 0
Merced Merced 50 Merced Merced 50
Merced Merced 50
Merced Merce
1 South
South
0 0
South
South
0 0
0 0
Golden Sta 0
Golden Sta 0
00 South
South
0 0
SR 99 0
21 00
Sumner
Sumner
1 2
21 21
21 21
S
SUN
N
Y
SID
EAV
E
S
SUN
N
Y
SID
EAV
E
49 15
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
00 00
00 0
25%24
925%
7%3
7%7
0%0
0%0
18%17
18%6
3%3
3%0
40%38
40%14
20%20
20%6
20%6
20%20
55%52
55%18
25%24
25%8
15%14
15%5
15%14
15%5
15%14
15%5
15%5
15%14
15%5
15%14
15%14
0%0
15%5
5%1
55%
15%14
16%5
16%15
15%5
AM Project Only Trip Distribution
287
Section , Item A
0 0
1 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 2
2 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
00 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 45
77 33
19 SR 99 0
SR 90 9
Sumner
Sumner
0 0
Sumner
Sumner
2 1

PARLIER AVE

PARLIER AVE
6 2

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
2 2
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
32 Manning
Manning
0 0
Manning
Manning
1 2
E
E

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
6 2
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
11 21

E PARLIER AVEE PARLIER AVE
29 16

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
16 24 S
S
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
22 14

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
12 12

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
2 2
Sumner
Sumner
1 1
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
35 69

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
5026
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
3468
Sumner
Sumner
0 0
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
12 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 5
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
32 56
45 SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
45 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 5
SR 90 9
Fowler/99 0 SR 90 9
Sumner
Sumner
0 0
Fowler/99 0
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
0 Golden Sta 1
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
20 14
Manning
Manning
12 15
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
20 14
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
20 14
F
owle
r
F
owle
r
2 0
1 4
16 24
16 24
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
14 20

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
42 E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 5

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 5
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
85 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
0 0
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
31 Merced Merced 58
Fowler
Fowler
8 5
Fowler/99 0
Merced Merced 58
Fowler 8 0
8 F
owle
r
5 5
0 5
0 5
Fowler/99 0
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
SR 90 9
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
Fowler/99 0
SR 99 0
0 0
1 0
Golden Sta 0
Golden Sta 3 Merced Merced 58
Merced Merced 57
0 1
Golden Sta 1
Golden Sta 0
5 7
Golden Sta 1
3 5
Golden Sta 1
3 2
Merced Merced 32 Merced Merced 32
Merced Merced 32
Merced Merced 10
Merced Merced 10
South
South
0 0
South
South
0 0
1 0
Golden Sta 0
Golden Sta 0
00 South
South
0 0
Merced Merced 10
Manning
Manning
12 15
Manning
Manning
12 15
20 0
Manning/99
Manning/99
2 0
10 15
Manning
Manning
10 15
Manning/9 2 9
0 Manning
Manning
10 15
SR 90 9
SR 99 M 0 anning/99 0SR 90 9
SR 99 0
Mannin
Mannin
1015
0 Manning
0 Manning/99 0
SR 99 0
SR 90 9
SR 90 9
SR 99 0
0 0
Golden
0 0 0
0 Golden Sta 0
0 0
Tem
pera
nce
Tem
pera
nce
0 0
Tem
peran
ce
Tem
peran
ce
00 South
South
0 0
Temperance
Temperance
00 Sou
Sou
0 0
Te
mp
era
nce
Te
mp
era
nce
00 Te
mper
ance
Te
mper
ance
00 12
00 Sumner
Sumner
2 1
12 12
12 12
S
SUN
N
Y
SID
EAV
E
S
SUN
N
Y
SID
EAV
E
32 56
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
00 00
00 Manning/99 0
0 0
SR 90 9
Golden Sta 0
0 25%16
2825%
7%8
7%4
0%0
0%0
18%12
18%20
3%2
3%3
40%26
40%44
20%13
20%22
20%22
20%13
55%35
55%59
25%16
25%27
15%9
15%16
15%10
15%16
15%9
15%16
15%16
15%10
15%16
15%10
15%9
0%0
15%16
5%5
35%
15%10
16%17
16%10
76 15%
16 PM Project Only Trip Distribution
288
Section , Item A
3 8
31 124
30 27
2 3132
0 0
17 28
91 138
0 0
42 36
21 31
9 1
2 5
7 6
75 9
72 9
23 41
71 35
35 2
2 2
2 00
00 02
Sumner
Sumner
182
44 Sumner
Sumner
4 24

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
3 16

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
21 23
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
20 3
20 2
Manning
Manning
171
367
Manning
Manning
182
342

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
3 16
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
19 2
18 1

E PARLIER AVEE PARLIER AVE
1638

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
14 27
SSU
NNYSID
E
AV
E
SSU
NNYSID
E
AV
E
122

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
16 38

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
21 23
Sumner
Sumner
4171
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
19 1
18 6

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
3 0
S
CL
O
V
I
S
CL
O
V
I
20 4
21 Sumner
Sumner
2 12
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
122

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
3 0
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
122
30 E SOUTH AVEE SOUTH AVE
30 E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
3 0
SR 99 3102
Fowler/99 205 SR 99 2897
Sumner
Sumner
182
44 Fowler/99 205
SR 99 2897
5022
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
16 4
86 Manning
Manning
249
453
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
166
88 Fo
wler
Fo
wler
16 6
88 F
owle
r
F
owle
r
1 66
8 8
14 27
14 27
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
88 166

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
17 9
11 4

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
3 0

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
3 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
23 8
10 5

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
0 0
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
23 6
10 5
Merced Merced 513 69
Fowler
Fowler 128 230
Fowler/99 295
Merced Merced 239 56
Fowler 103 25
128
F
owle
r
2 61
2 3
0 32
230
25 Fowler/99 57
SR 99 2954
SR 99 4761
SR 99 2897
SR 99 2954
SR 99 4727
Fowler/99 34
SR 99 4761
0 0 5
Golden Sta 271
Golden Sta 673 Merced Merced 239 56
Merced Merced 231 52
44 Golden Sta 305
52 Golden Sta 384
61 Golden Sta 708
169
105 Merced Merced 169 105 Merced Merced 169 105
Merced Merce
169
South
South
0 0
South
South
17 28
45 77
Golden Sta 226
Golden Sta 512
3135
South
South
31 35
SR 99 4761
122
00 Sumner
Sumner
4 24
122
122
122
122
S
S
U
N
N
Y
SI
D
E
AV
E
S
S
U
N
N
Y
SI
D
E
AV
E
122
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
00 541
2019 No Project AM
289
Section , Item A
7 17
35 35
117
50 128
17 3 3435
0 0
36 25
120
85 0
0 37
2 4
5 9
0 7
7 25
65 24
60 23
78 61
42 34
1 3
2 1
00 00
SR 99 4679
Sumner
Sumner
75 178
Sumner
Sumner
20 8

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
8 4

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
27 22
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
25 3
20 3
Manning
Manning
351
207
Manning
Manning
327
211

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
8 4
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
23 6
18 9

E PARLIER AVEE PARLIER AVE
2619

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
18 16
SSU
NNYSID
E
AV
E
SSU
NNYSID
E
AV
E
39 E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
26 19

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
27 22
Sumner
Sumner
7861
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
24 0
19 2

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
4 0
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
27 6
21 7
Sumner
Sumner
11 5
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
39 E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
4 0
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
39 40

E SOUTH AVEE SOUTH AVE
40 E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
4 0
SR 99 4679
Fowler/99 353 SR 99 4326
Sumner
Sumner
75 178
Fowler/99 353
SR 99 4326
99 3706
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
14 0
99 Manning
Manning
456
267
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
142
99 Fo
wler
Fo
wler
14 2
99 F
owle
r
F
owle
r
1 42
9 9
18 16
18 16
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
99 142

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
15 9
11 5

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
4 0

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
4 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
16 3
15 4

E SOUTH AVE

E SOUTH AVE
0 0
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
15 9
15 4
Merced Merced 344 123
Fowler
Fowler 185 155
Fowler/99 165
Merced Merced 205 91
Fowler 152 33
185
F
owle
r
1 75
1 5
5 20
155
33 Fowler/99 53
SR 99 4379
SR 99 3598
SR 99 4326
SR 99 4379
SR 99 3540
Fowler/99 58
SR 99 3598
0 0 3
Golden Sta 892
Golden Sta 460 Merced Merced 205 91
Merced Merced 187 84
76 63
Golden Sta 973
84 Golden Sta 1039
97 Golden Sta 481
144
127 Merced Merced 144 127 Merced Merced 144 127
Merced Merced 144 127
Me
31 South
South
0 0
South
South
36 25
83 42
Golden Sta 907
Golden Sta 347
4245
SR 99 3598
39 00
Sumner
Sumner
20 8
39 39
39 39
S
S
U
N
N
Y
SI
D
E
AV
E
S
S
U
N
N
Y
SI
D
E
AV
E
39 S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
00 302
2019 No Project PM
290
Section , Item A
3 6
29 35
101
166
167
37 33
1 3634
0 0
17 31
107
186
0 0
62 47
32 34
7 30
1 0
0 2
3 16
83 111
16 78
10 1
45 86
37 41
3 2
2 3
0 0
00 SR 99 3968
Sumner
Sumner
227
53 Sumner
Sumner
6 30
ER AVE
ER AVE

TH AVETH AVE
26 43
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
24 2
20 5
Manning
Manning
236
470
Manning
Manning
209
403

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
24 2
20 5

E PARLIER AVEE PARLIER AVE
0 0

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0 S
S
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
00 E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
26 43
Sumner
Sumner
4586
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
SC
LO
V
ISAV
E
24 1
22 1

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
4 3
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
S
CL
O
V
IS
AV
E
25 9
25 6
Sumner
Sumner
6 30
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
NN
YSI
DE
AV
E
00 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 3
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
SS
UNN
Y
SI
DEAV
E
00 43

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
43 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 3
SR 99 3968
Fowler/99 190 SR 99 3778
Sumner
Sumner
227
53 Fowler/99 190
SR 99 3778
SR 99
92 5892
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
14 3
14 5
Manning
Manning
299
529
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
144
147
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
14 4
14 7
F
owle
r
F
owle
r
1 44
1 47
0 0
0 0
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
147
144

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
14 4
14 7

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 3

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
4 3
Fo
wler
Fo
wler
28 3
12 3

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
0 0
Fowle
r
Fowle
r
28 3
12 4
Merced Merced 569 87
Fowler
Fowler 153 271
Fowler/99 325
Merced Merced 269 71
Fowler 117 36
153
F
owle
r
3 10
2 7
1 39
271
36 Fowler/99 75
SR 99 3853
SR 99 5609
SR 99 3778
SR 99 3853
SR 99 5567
Fowler/99 41
SR 99 5609
0 0 7
Golden Sta 602
Golden Sta 1307 Merced Merced 269 71
Merced Merced 264 67
63 41
Golden Sta 656
67 Golden Sta 733
76 Golden Sta 1339
207
119 Merced Merced 207 119 Merced Merced 207 119
Merced Merced 207 119
Merced Me
46 South
South
0 0
South
South
17 31
47 87
Golden Sta 551
Golden Sta 1099
3445
South
South
34 45
SR 99 5609
Golden Sta 1128
00 00
Sumner
Sumner
6 30
00 00
00 00
S
SUN
N
Y
SID
EAV
E
S
SUN
N
Y
SID
EAV
E
00 S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
S
SU
N
NY
SI
DE
AV
E
00 00
00 Golden Sta 551
1128
2046 No Project AM
291
Section , Item A
9 9
38 53
100
4 122
137
65 169
11 5 4041
0 0
38 27
164
105
0 0
57 63
29 30
31 13
4 9
1 0
2 0
58 30
38 100
25 60
22 96
59 49
38 3
3 4
1 0
0 00
SR 99 5699
Sumner
Sumner
93 216
Sumner
Sumner
2811

PARLIER AVE

PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
49 27
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
2 5
1 1
9 8
Manning
Manning
468
288
Manning
Manning
394
241

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
2 5
1 1
9 8

E PARLIER AVEE PARLIER AVE
0 0

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0 S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
00 E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
49 27
Sumner
Sumner
9659
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
2 6
7 1
9 9

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
8 1
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
S
C
L
O
V
I
S
AV
E
3 0
3 2
1 5
Sumner
Sumner
28 11
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
00 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
8 1
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
00 81

SOUTH AVESOUTH AVE
81 SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
8 1
SR 99 5699
Fowler/99 386 SR 99 5313
Sumner
Sumner
93 216
Fowler/99 386
SR 99 5313
SR 99 4799
4799
F
o
w
el r
F
o
w
el r
1 8
1 1
2 9
Manning
Manning
533
340
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 8
4 1
3 0
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 8
4 1
3 0
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 8
4 1
3 0
0 0
0 0
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 3
0 1
8 4

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 8
4 1
3 0

E PARLIER AVE

E PARLIER AVE
0 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
8 1

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
8 1
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 9
0 2
2 0

SOUTH AVE

SOUTH AVE
0 0
F
o
wle
r
F
o
wle
r
1 8
6 2
2 2
Merced Merced 344 162
Fowler
Fowler 260 179
Fowler/99 183
Merced Merced 199 121
Fowler 217 43
260
F
o
wle
r
1 9
4 1
7 9
15 179
43 Fowler/99 58
SR 99 5370
SR 99 4695
SR 99 5313
SR 99 5370
SR 99 4616
Fowler/99 79
SR 99 4695
0 0 5
Golden Sta 1433
Golden Sta 662 Merced Merced 199 121
Merced Merced 189 112
81 70
Golden Sta 1575
Golden Sta 1627
Golden Sta 693
143
148 Merced Merced 143 148 Merced Merced 143 148
Merced Merced 143 148
Merced Merced 2517
2 South
South
0 0
South
South
38 27
88 52
Golden Sta 1461
Golden Sta 526
4243
South
South
42 43
M
M
Manning
Manning
570
367
SR 99 4695
SR 99 5370
53 SR 99 4695
1461
Golden Sta 489 Tempera
nce
648
T
e
m
pe
r
a
n
c
e
T
e
m
pe
r
a
n
c
e
6 0
3 6
4 2
South
South
42 43
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
n
c
e
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
n
c
e
6 5
2 6
2 2
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
n
ce
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
n
ce
5 8
9 T
e
m
p
T
e
m
p
6 00
00 Sumner
Sumner
28 11
00 00
00 00
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
S
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
00 S
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
S
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
AV
E
00 00
00 Golden Sta 1461
489
2046 No Project PM
292
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix F

APPENDIX F
Signal Warrants
293
Section , Item A
YAMABE & HORN ENGINEERING, INC.
2985 N. Burl Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93727
WARRANT 3 – PEAK HOUR SATISFIED: YES NO
(Part A OR Part B must be satisfied)
Date:

Job Number:

Project:

Major Street:

Minor Street:

Description:

Peak Hour: AM PM
PART A SATISFIED: YES NO
Value

4.9 vehhrs
344
vph
1,379
vph
Minor street approach:

PART B SATISFIED: YES NO
One 2 or
More
Hour
Both Approaches - Major Street 713
Higher Approach - Minor Street 344
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (70% Factor) Yes No The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. 70% Factor is applicable for community less than 10,000 population or above 40 mph on major street.

Source: 2014 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

APPROACH LANES

2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches.

Yes No
Near Term Plus Pending/Approved Projects
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)

1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a onelane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; ANDYes No 02/06/26
24-325
SB 99 Off Ramp/ Fowler Avenue
Sumner Avenue/ Merced Street
Sunnyside Avenue & Parlier Avenue T6519
294
Section , Item A
California MUTCD 2014 Edition

NEAR TERM BUILD OUT PM
Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
BOTH APPROACHES – MAJOR STREET: 1079
HIGHER APPROACH – MINOR STREET: 143
BOTH APPROACHES – MAJOR STREET: 1079
HIGHER APPROACH – MINOR STREET: 143
295
Section , Item A
YAMABE & HORN ENGINEERING, INC.
2985 N. Burl Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93727
WARRANT 3 – PEAK HOUR SATISFIED: YES NO
(Part A OR Part B must be satisfied)
Date:

Job Number:

Project:

Major Street:

Minor Street:

Description:

Peak Hour: AM PM
PART A SATISFIED: YES NO
Value

3.2 vehhrs
239
vph
1,235
vph
Minor street approach:

PART B SATISFIED: YES NO
One 2 or
More
Hour
Both Approaches - Major Street 631
Higher Approach - Minor Street 413
The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-3. Yes No OR, The plotted point falls above the curve in Figure 4C-4. (70% Factor) Yes No The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. 70% Factor is applicable for community less than 10,000 population or above 40 mph on major street.

Source: 2014 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices

APPROACH LANES

2. The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes; AND
Yes No

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches.

Yes No
Near Term Plus Pending/Approved Projects
(All parts 1, 2, and 3 below must be satisfied for the same one hour, for any four consecutive 15-minute periods)

1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a onelane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; ANDYes No 02/06/26
24-325
Sunnyside Avenue & Parlier Avenue T6519
SB 99 Off Ramp/ Fowler Avenue
Sumner Avenue/ Merced Street
296
Section , Item A
California MUTCD 2014 Edition

NEAR TERM BUILD OUT AM
Chapter 4C – Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies
Part 4 – Highway Traffic Signals
BOTH APPROACHES – MAJOR STREET: 631
HIGHER APPROACH – MINOR STREET: 413
BOTH APPROACHES – MAJOR STREET: 631
HIGHER APPROACH – MINOR STREET: 413
297
Section , Item A
F:\2024\24-325\Traffic\Report\Word Doc\24-325 TIS.docxAppendix G 298
Section , Item A
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-06

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER AMENDING

THE OFFICAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FOWLER TO REFLECT A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 345-100-08S.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1
The City Council hereby finds that prezoning Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-08S to the R-1- 6 (Single Family Residential) mapping zone district with an implementing zone district of R-3 (Medium Density Residential) satisfies each of the required findings for a prezone pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance section 9.110.070:
a. The Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the General Plan.
b. The Zoning Map Amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards to ensure compatibility with other established uses.
c. The Zoning Map Amendment provides reasonable property development rights while protecting environmentally sensitive land uses and species. d. The Zoning Map Amendment ensures protection of the general health, safety, and welfare of the community.

The bases for these findings are supported by the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing.

SECTION 2
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Fowler is hereby amended to designate Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-08S to the R-1-6 zone district as indicated in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and 300
Section 9, Item A
incorporated by reference herein.

SECTION 3
Based on the testimony and information presented at its public hearing, the City Council finds that the City previously prepared and adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies and interested organizations. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration identified that several approvals were included within the scope of the Project, including a prezone and annexation. Preparation of the environmental analysis necessitated a thorough review of the proposed Project and relevant environmental issues. Based on this review and assessment, the City Council finds there is no substantial evidence in the record that this Project may have significant direct, indirect, or cumulative effects on the environment after mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program have been implemented, and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for this Project. The City Council further finds the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was timely and properly published and noticed as required by CEQA. As such, the City Council finds that the amendment to the City’s Official Zoning Map as proposed by this Project has been fully assessed in accordance with CEQA, no subsequent review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and no further action or review is required under CEQA.

SECTION 4
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days following its final passage and adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the ordinance, or a summary of the ordinance, shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of Fowler held on the 18th day of August, 2026, and passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the _____ day of ________________, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
___________________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
301
Section 9, Item A
Exhibit A
302
Section 9, Item A
RESOLUTION NO. 2853

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER ADOPTING A

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15070-15075, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 345-100-08S TO MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, PREZONING ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 345-100-08S TO THE R-1-6 ZONE DISTRICT/R-3 IMPLEMENTING ZONE DISTRICT, AND INTITIATING ANNEXATION OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 345-100-08S.

WHEREAS, Yamabe & Horn Engineering, on behalf of Joseph Crown and Crown Homes (“Applicant”), has proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519 (“Project”), as well as a request to amend the General Plan land use designation of, prezone, and annex Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-08S (“Project Site”) to the City of Fowler; and WHEREAS, the Project proposes to subdivide the Project site into 183 single family residential lots, an 90,300 square foot (“sqft”) park, landscape areas including internal paseos and a trail, as well as other site improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Project site comprises a 39.93-acre parcel, located at the northwest corner of East Parlier Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue, that is designated as Low Density Residential (“LDR”) by the City of Fowler General Plan, and is zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR to Medium Low Density Residential (“MLDR”); and WHEREAS, the Project proposes a density of 4.58 dwelling units per acre, which meets the density range of the MLDR land use designation; and WHEREAS, the Project site would be prezoned to the R-1-6 mapping zone district, with an implementing zone district of R-3 (Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the site’s MLDR land use designation; and
WHEREAS, the Project site would be annexed to the City of Fowler as a part of the Project; and
WHEREAS, in addition to being annexed to the City of Fowler, Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-08S would annex to the Selma Kingsburg Fowler County Sanitation District and would detach from the Kings River Resource Conservation District, Consolidated Irrigation District, and the Fresno County Fire Protection District as part of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Fowler desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Cortese-KnoxHertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Government Code Section 56000 for the proposed annexation; and 303
Section 9, Item A
WHEREAS, the Applicant and property owner of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-08S has applied for annexation of the subject property to the City of Fowler, and the territory proposed to be changed contains less than 12 registered voters and is considered to be uninhabited; and WHEREAS, an illustration of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto, and a map and written description accurately depicting said territory shall be forwarded to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County upon application; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the City of Fowler sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is intended to facilitate development of the Project site, constituting a logical expansion of the city limits; and WHEREAS, via adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-06 the Project will be prezoned consistent with its amended General Plan land use designation, described above; and WHEREAS, prior to City approval of the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, a Williamson Act contract existing for the Project site must be tentatively cancelled with the County of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, due to the proposed General Plan Amendment, the City has found that the Project was not wholly analyzed as part of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report certified for the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared, circulated, and made available for public comment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000, et seq.; and Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15000, et seq.), attached hereto as “Exhibit B”; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the July 24, 2026, edition of The Business Journal, posted at City Hall and the City’s website, and sent to interested parties via email; and
WHEREAS, at a special meeting on July 9, 2026, at 6:30pm, the Fowler Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Project and the Planning Commission determined that the proposed subdivision was inconsistent with the intent of the General Plan because it would result in a development pattern characterized by lot sizes smaller than those which would be allowed to be developed under the Low Density Residential land use, recommending denial of the Project to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the item was scheduled to be considered by the City Council at its regular meeting on August 4, 2026, but was continued to the August 18, 2026, regular City Council meeting due to a lack of quorum; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on August 18, 2026, at 6:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as 304
Section 9, Item A
the item could be heard, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all evidence presented at the City Council’s regular meeting on August 18, 2026, including oral and written public testimony on the Project (“Administrative Record”), which is incorporated by this reference herein.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fowler, based upon the entire Administrative Record of proceedings, hereby resolves as follows:

1. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project should be considered adequate, reflect the City’s independent judgment and analysis, and have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program set forth in Exhibit “B”, including the mitigation measures identified therein and as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, should be adopted.

3. That the City Council makes the following findings pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance Section 9.45.070:
a. The amendment is consistent with the intent of the General Plan vision statement and supporting principles, goals, and policies. b. The amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards for affected land uses to ensure compatibility and integrity of those uses with other established uses.
c. The amendment provides for the protection of the general health, safety, and/or welfare of the community.

4. This Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Fowler, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County is hereby requested to initiate proceedings for the change of organization/reorganization of territory as described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto, in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

5. That the City Council initiates annexation of Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100- 08S, directing the Community & Economic Development Director (or designee) to prepare and transmit the Annexation Proposal for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519 to the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission.

6. That the City Council requires the Applicant to prepare all necessary exhibits and pay for all fees related to the annexation of the Subject Property. 305
Section 9, Item A

7. The bases for these findings are detailed in the August 18, 2026, staff report, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing which are hereby incorporated by reference.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August 2026, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Fowler by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:__________________________
ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
306
Section 9, Item A
EXHIBIT “A”
307
Section 9, Item A
EXHIBIT “B”

INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
HTTPS://WWW.FOWLERCITY.ORG/MEDIA/6721
308
Section 9, Item A

CITY OF FOWLER

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
NO. 6519

RESPONSE TO PUBLIC

COMMENTS
JULY 2026
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF FOWLER
128 S. 5th STREET, FOWLER, CALIFORNIA 93625
PREPARED BY:

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
455 W. FIR AVENUE, CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA 93611
"Exhibit C"
309
Section 9, Item A
G:\Fowler_City of-2619\2619 On-Call Planning Services\_Application Files\_Tract Maps and Subdivision Maps\2025\261925029 - TTM 6519 NW Corner of Parlier_Sunnyside\Environmental\Final ENV\Response to Comments\Fowler Tract 6519 Response to Comments_F.docx Report Prepared for:

CITY OF FOWLER
128 S. 5
th Street
Fowler, CA 93625
Contact:

Dawn E. Marple, City Planner
559-834-3113
Report Prepared by:

Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP, Project Manager/QAQC
Alejandra Lopez Gonzalez, Technical Writer
Jackie Lancaster, Administrative Support
Contact:

Wyatt Czeshinski, Project Manager
559-449-2700
COPYRIGHT 2026 BY PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights to this document. This document is not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group In the event of unauthorized reuse of the information contained herein by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group's legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.
310
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
Job No.: 2619-25-029
Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Comment letter A – Department of Toxic Substances Control (June 19, 2026) .......................................... 1 Comment A/1 ..............................................................................................................................................1 Response A/1...............................................................................................................................................1 Comment A/2 ..............................................................................................................................................1 Response A/2...............................................................................................................................................1 Comment A/3 ..............................................................................................................................................1 Response A/3...............................................................................................................................................2 Comment A/4 ..............................................................................................................................................2 Response A/4...............................................................................................................................................2 Comment Letter B – San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (July 2, 2026) .................................. 1 Comment B/1 ..............................................................................................................................................1 Response B/1...............................................................................................................................................1 Comment B/2 ..............................................................................................................................................1 Response B/2...............................................................................................................................................1 Comment B/3 ..............................................................................................................................................1 Response B/3...............................................................................................................................................1 Comment B/4 ..............................................................................................................................................2 Response B/4...............................................................................................................................................2 Comment B/5 ..............................................................................................................................................2 Response B/5...............................................................................................................................................2 Comment B/6 ..............................................................................................................................................2 Response B/6...............................................................................................................................................2 Comment B/7 ..............................................................................................................................................2 Response B/7...............................................................................................................................................3 Comment B/8 ..............................................................................................................................................3 Response B/8...............................................................................................................................................3 Comment B/9 ..............................................................................................................................................3 Response B/9...............................................................................................................................................3 Comment B/10 ............................................................................................................................................3 Response B/10.............................................................................................................................................3 Comment B/11 ............................................................................................................................................3 Response B/11.............................................................................................................................................4 Comment B/12 ............................................................................................................................................4 Response B/12.............................................................................................................................................4 Comment B/13 ............................................................................................................................................4 Response B/13.............................................................................................................................................4 Comment B/14 ............................................................................................................................................4 Response B/14.............................................................................................................................................4 311
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
Job No.: 2619-25-029
ES-1

INTRODUCTION
The following are the City of Fowler’s (City) responses to comments received during the public review period for the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), dated July 2026, prepared for the Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519 Project (SCH No. 2026060823). The Notice of Intent to adopt an IS was circulated for public review from June 17, 2026, through July 6, 2026. Two (2) letters were received during the public review comment period: One comment was received from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and one (1) comment letter was received from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD).

Comments received during the public review period did not result in significant changes to the IS/MND.

Although comments included recommendations, editorial comments and suggestions, no new unavoidable significant effects were identified, and mitigation measures were not lessened as a result of responding to comments. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 2022 Section 15073.5 (c) 1, the IS/MND has not been substantially revised after public notice of its availability and therefore does not require recirculation.
312
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
Response to Comments
1 COMMENT LETTER A – DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
CONTROL (JUNE 19, 2026)
COMMENT A/1
Commentor states - If buildings or other structures are to be demolished anywhere on the Project site, surveys should be conducted for the presence of lead based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. Removal, demolition, and disposal of any of the above-mentioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition,sampling near current and/or former buildingsshould be conducted in accordance with DTSC’s Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual.

RESPONSE A/1
Demolition of any existing buildings on the Project site would be done so in accordance with all applicable State and federal laws regarding removal and disposal of chemicals of concern, including the processing of a demolition permit through the City and the adherence to all SJVAPCD rules and requirements. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT A/2
Commentor states - When agricultural crops and/or land uses are proposed or rezoned for residential use, several Contaminants of Concern (COCs) can be present. The Lead Agency shall identify the amounts of Pesticides and Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) historically used on the property. If present, OCPs requiring further analysis are dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, toxaphene, and dieldrin. Additionally, any level of arsenic present would require further analysis and sampling and must meet approved local area baselines or thresholds. If they do not, remedial action must take place to mitigate them below those thresholds. Additional COCs may be found in mixing, loading, and storage areas, drainage ditches, farmhouses, or any other outbuildings and should be sampled and analyzed. If smudge pots had been routinely utilized, additional sampling for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and/or Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons may be required. These recommendations should be adhered to and become part of the environmental document. Please refer to the DTSC’s Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) webpage for the most recent guidance and screening levels.

RESPONSE A/2
No contaminants of concern, including arsenic, are known to exist on the site. Despite this, the applicant/contractor is required adhere to all State and federal laws related to soil screening and any required remediation, if necessary. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT A/3
DTSC recommends all imported soil/fill material be tested to ensure all COCs meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual. Furthermore, DTSC advises referencing the DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet if importing soil/fill is necessary. To minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil/fill material, there should be documentation of the origins of the soil/fill material and, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure thatthe imported soil/fillmaterial issuitable forthe intended land use. The sampling should include analysis based on the source of the soil/fill and knowledge of prior land use. 313
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
Response to Comments
2 RESPONSE A/3
It is not anticipated that imported fill will be required to support the Project. Should imported fill be needed, the contractor shall abide by all State and federal requirements for soil testing. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT A/4
The City of Fowler should consider soil testing as mentioned in Comment A/1. If, in the event any COC results are above DTSC residential screening levels, DTSC recommends the City of Fowler ensure that any potential contamination be fully characterized and then remediated under the oversight of a self-certified local agency, DTSC, or Regional Water Quality Control Board. If entering into one of DTSC’s voluntary agreements, please note that DTSC uses a single standard Request for Lead Agency Oversight Application for all agreement types. Please apply for DTSC oversight using this link: Request for Agency Oversight Application. Submittal of the online application includes an agreement to pay costs incurred during agreement preparation. If you have any questions about the application portal, please contact the relevant Regional Brownfield Coordinator for your Project.

RESPONSE A/4
Comment noted. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.
314
Section 9, Item A
dtsc.ca.gov

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
June 19, 2026
Dawn E. Marple
City Planner
City of Fowler
128 South Fifth Street
Fowler, CA 93625
[email protected]
RE: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 6519 DATED JUNE 17, 2026, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER 2026060823
Dear Dawn E. Marple,
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519 (Project). Yamabe & Horn Engineering, on behalf of Joseph Crown and Crown Homes, has proposed a Tentative Subdivision Map on a parcel of approximately 39.93 acres in size. The Project site is designated as Low Density Residential by the City’s General Plan and is zoned Exclusive Agriculture by the County of Fresno. As a part of the Project, the applicant has proposed a General Plan Amendment to amend the site’s General Plan land use designation to Medium Low Density Residential. The Project would subdivide the Project Site into 183 single family residential lots and construct an approximately 85,867 square foot park. According to property records, structures on the Project site were built in 1925. The Project area was historically used for agricultural use. DTSC recommends and requests consideration of the following comments:

LETTER A
315
Section 9, Item A
Dawn E. Marple
June 19, 2026

Page 2 ends

1. If buildings or other structures are to be demolished anywhere on the Project site, surveys should be conducted for the presence of leadbased paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk.

Removal, demolition, and disposal of any of the abovementioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition, sampling near current and/or former buildings should be conducted in accordance with DTSC’s Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual.

2. When agricultural crops and/or land uses are proposed or rezoned for residential use, several Contaminants of Concern (COCs) can be present. The Lead Agency shall identify the amounts of Pesticides and Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) historically used on the property. If present, OCPs requiring further analysis are dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, toxaphene, and dieldrin. Additionally, any level of arsenic present would require further analysis and sampling and must meet approved local area baselines or thresholds. If they do not, remedial action must take place to mitigate them below those thresholds. Additional COCs may be found in mixing, loading, and storage areas, drainage ditches, farmhouses, or any other outbuildings and should be sampled and analyzed. If smudge pots had been routinely utilized, additional sampling for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and/or Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons may be required. These recommendations should be adhered to and become part of the environmental document. Please refer to the DTSC’s Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) webpage for the most recent guidance and screening levels.

3. DTSC recommends all imported soil/fill material be tested to ensure all COCs meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual. Furthermore, DTSC advises referencing the DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet if importing soil/fill is necessary. To minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil/fill material, there should be documentation of the origins of the soil/fill material and, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported A/1 A/2 A/3
316
Section 9, Item A
Dawn E. Marple
June 19, 2026

Page 3 ends

soil/fill material is suitable for the intended land use. The sampling should include analysis based on the source of the soil/fill and knowledge of prior land use.

4. The City of Fowler should consider soil testing as mentioned in comment #1. If, in the event any COC results are above DTSC residential screening levels, DTSC recommends the City of Fowler ensure that any potential contamination be fully characterized and then remediated under the oversight of a selfcertified local agency, DTSC, or Regional Water Quality Control Board. If entering into one of DTSC’s voluntary agreements, please note that DTSC uses a single standard Request for Lead Agency Oversight Application for all agreement types. Please apply for DTSC oversight using this link: Request for Agency Oversight Application. Submittal of the online application includes an agreement to pay costs incurred during agreement preparation. If you have any questions about the application portal, please contact the relevant Regional Brownfield Coordinator for your Project.

DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND for the Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519. Thank you for your assistance in protecting California’s people and environment from the harmful effects of toxic substances. If you have any questions or would like clarification on DTSC’s comments, please respond to this letter or via CEQA Review email for additional guidance.

Sincerely,
Dave Kereazis
Associate Environmental Planner
HWMPPermitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
A/3
cont. A/4
317
Section 9, Item A
Dawn E. Marple
June 19, 2026

Page 4 ends

cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation
State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Wyatt Czeshinski
Assistant Planner
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group / Consulting Firm
[email protected]
Tamara Purvis
Associate Environmental Planner
HWMP Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Scott Wiley
Analyst II
HWMP Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
318
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
1 COMMENT LETTER B – SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL DISTRICT (JULY 2, 2026)
COMMENT B/1
The District recommends, to further reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the Project should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.

RESPONSE B/1
Comment noted. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/2
Commenter states that the IS/MND qualitatively discussed the health risk impacts associated with the Project, and concluded that the impacts would be less than significant, because “… the Project would not exceed the daily emission thresholds set by the SJVAPCD.” Commenter states that although the Project criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operation will not exceed the daily emission thresholds, the Project may have the potential to result in health impacts to nearby receptors. The District recommends that a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) be performed for the Project.

RESPONSE B/2
The HARP2 air dispersion model was run for the Project site to show the health risk the Project would have on sensitive receptors in the area. The model run, which can be viewed in Appendix A, indicates that the Project would result in a cancer risk of 0.0118 in one million, which is less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of 20 in one million. The Project would also present a chronic risk of 0.0000561 in one million and an acute risk of 0 in one million, which would be less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of one in one million for both chronic and acute risk. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/3
The commenter suggests the City consider the feasibility of incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units). Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.

RESPONSE B/3
Comment noted. The Project will be required to meet all applicable single family residential design guidelines, including the landscaping and street tree requirements outlined in Chapter 9.165 of the Fowler Zoning Ordinance. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary. 319
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
2 COMMENT B/4
Since the Project consists of residential development, gas-powered residential lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits.

The commenter recommends the Project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment.

RESPONSE B/4
Comment noted. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/5
Commenter states that it is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The commenter suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for the Project.

RESPONSE B/5
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all State requirements related to solar energy installation for single family residential homes. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/6
The commenter states that the District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes. The commenter gave a link to the current District rules.

RESPONSE B/6
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/7
Commenter states that Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using 320
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
3 Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The commenter states that the Project may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, the Project proponent should submit to the District an application for an ATC.

RESPONSE B/7
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/8
The commenter states that the Project is subject to District Rule 9510 because it will receive a projectlevel discretionary approval from a public agency and will equal or exceed 50 residential dwelling units.

RESPONSE B/8
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/9
The commenter states that the Project will be subject to District Rule 4002 since the Project will include demolition and removal of existing structures. To protect the public from uncontrolled emissions of asbestos, this rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility is demolished or renovated. Any asbestos present must be handled in accordance with established work practice standards and disposal requirements.

RESPONSE B/9
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/10
The commenter states that the Project may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it may utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs. The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings. In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements.

RESPONSE B/10
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/11
The commenter states that the project proponent may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving 321
Section 9, Item A
CITY OF FOWLER July
Tentative subdivision Map No. 6519
4 activities as described in Regulation VIII, specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities. Should the project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5-acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities).

RESPONSE B/11
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/12
The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from wood burning fireplaces, wood burning heaters, and outdoor wood burning devices. This rule establishes limitations on the installation of new wood burning fireplaces and wood burning heaters. Specifically, at elevations below 3,000 feet in areas with natural gas service, no person shall install a wood burning fireplace, low mass fireplace, masonry heater, or wood burning heater.

RESPONSE B/12
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/13
The Project may also be subject to the following District rules: Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).

RESPONSE B/13
Comment noted. The Project will comply with all SJVAPCD rules and regulations. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.

COMMENT B/14
The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.

RESPONSE B/14
Comment noted. No changes to the IS/MND are necessary.
322
Section 9, Item A
July 2, 2026
Dawn Marple
City of Fowler
Planning & Community Development Department
128 South Fifth Street
Fowler, CA 93625
Project: Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519
District CEQA Reference No: 20260716
Dear Ms. Marple:

The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) from the City of Fowler (City) for the above project. Per the IS/MND, the project consists of the construction of 183 singlefamily homes and an 85,867 square foot park on 39.93 acres (Project). The Project is located at the northwest corner of South Sunnyside Avenue and East Parlier Avenue in Fowler, CA (APN: 345-100-08S).

The District offers the following comments at this time regarding the Project:

Construction Emissions
The District recommends, to further reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the Project should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.

Health Risk Screening/Assessment
The IS/MND qualitatively discussed the health risk impacts associated with the Project, and concluded that the impacts would be less than significant, because “… the Project would not exceed the daily emission thresholds set by the SJVAPCD.” Although the Project criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operation will not exceed the daily emission thresholds, the Project may have the potential to result in health impacts to nearby receptors. Assessing potential health risk impact from a project is different from assessing a project’s potential impact from criteria LETTER B B/1 B/2
323
Section 9, Item A
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 2 District Reference No: 20260716
July 2, 2026
pollutant emissions. Therefore, a Prioritization and/or a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be performed for the Project. These health risk determinations should quantify and characterize potential Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Air Resources Board (OEHHA/CARB) that pose a present or potential hazard to human health.

Health risk analyses should include all potential air emissions from the project, which include emissions from construction of the project, including multi-year construction, as well as ongoing operational activities of the project. Note, two common sources of TACs can be attributed to diesel exhaust emitted from heavy-duty off-road earth moving equipment during construction, and from ongoing operation of heavy-duty on-road trucks.

Prioritization (Screening Health Risk Assessment):

A “Prioritization” is the recommended method for a conservative screening-level health risk assessment. The Prioritization should be performed using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) methodology. Please contact the District for assistance with performing a Prioritization analysis.

The District recommends that a more refined analysis, in the form of an HRA, be performed for any project resulting in a Prioritization score of 10 or greater. This is because the prioritization results are a conservative health risk representation, while the detailed HRA provides a more accurate health risk evaluation.

Health Risk Assessment:

Prior to performing an HRA, it is strongly recommended that land use agencies/ project proponents develop and submit for District review a health risk modeling protocol that outlines the sources and methodologies that will be used to perform the HRA.

A development project would be considered to have a potentially significant health risk if the HRA demonstrates that the health impacts would exceed the District’s established risk thresholds, which can be found here:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.

A project with a significant health risk would trigger all feasible mitigation measures.

The District strongly recommends that development projects that result in a significant health risk not be approved by the land use agency. 324
Section 9, Item A
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 3 District Reference No: 20260716
July 2, 2026
The District is available to review HRA protocols and analyses. For HRA submittals please provide the following information electronically to the District for review:
• HRA (AERMOD) modeling files
• HARP2 files
• Summary of emissions source locations, emissions rates, and emission factor calculations and methodologies.

For assistance, please contact the District’s Technical Services Department by:
• E-Mailing inquiries to: [email protected]
• Calling (559) 230-5900
Vegetative Barriers and Urban Greening
There are residential units located north of the Project. The District suggests the City consider the feasibility of incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units).

While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, vegetative barriers have been shown to be an additional measure to potentially reduce a population’s exposure to air pollution through the interception of airborne particles and the update of gaseous pollutants. Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.

Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment in the Community
Since the Project consists of residential development, gas-powered residential lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits. The District recommends the Project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment. More information on the District CGYM program and funding can be found at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/grants/clean-green-yardmachines-residential/.

B/3 B/4
325
Section 9, Item A
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 4 District Reference No: 20260716
July 2, 2026
On-Site Solar Deployment
It is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zerocarbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The District suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for the Project.

District Rules and Regulations
The District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes.

The list of rules below is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. Current District rules can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/rules-and-planning/current-district-rulesand-regulations. To identify other District rules or regulations that apply to future projects, or to obtain information about District permit requirements, the project proponents are strongly encouraged to contact the District’s Small Business Assistance (SBA) Office at (559) 230-5888.

District Rules 2010 and 2201 - Air Quality Permitting for Stationary Sources
Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using Best Available Control Technology (BACT).

This Project may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, the Project proponent should submit to the B/6B/7 B/5
326
Section 9, Item A
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 5 District Reference No: 20260716
July 2, 2026
District an application for an ATC. For further information or assistance, the project proponent may contact the District’s SBA Office at (559) 230-5888.

District Rule 9510 - Indirect Source Review (ISR)
The Project is subject to District Rule 9510 because it will receive a projectlevel discretionary approval from a public agency and will equal or exceed 50 residential dwelling units.

The purpose of District Rule 9510 is to reduce the growth in both NOx and PM emissions associated with development and transportation projects from mobile and area sources; specifically, the emissions associated with the construction and subsequent operation of development projects. The ISR Rule requires developers to mitigate their NOx and PM emissions by incorporating clean air design elements into their projects. Should the proposed development project clean air design elements be insufficient to meet the required emission reductions, developers must pay a fee that ultimately funds incentive projects to achieve off-site emissions reductions.

Per Section 5.0 of the ISR Rule, an Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application is required to be submitted no later than applying for project-level approval from a public agency. As of the date of this letter, the District has not received an AIA application for this Project. Please inform the project proponent to immediately submit an AIA application to the District to comply with District Rule 9510 so that proper mitigation and clean air design under ISR can be incorporated into the Project’s design.

Information about how to comply with District Rule 9510 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview The AIA application form can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview/formsand-applications/ District staff is available to provide assistance and can be reached by phone at (559) 230-5900 or by email at [email protected].

District Rule 4002 (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)
The Project will be subject to District Rule 4002 since the Project will include demolition and removal of existing structures. To protect the public from uncontrolled emissions of asbestos, this rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility is demolished or B/8B/9
327
Section 9, Item A
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 6 District Reference No: 20260716
July 2, 2026
renovated. Any asbestos present must be handled in accordance with established work practice standards and disposal requirements.

Information on how to comply with District Rule 4002 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/demolition-renovation/.

District Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings)
The Project may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it may utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs.

The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings.

In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements. Additional information on how to comply with District Rule 4601 requirements can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/tkgjeusd/rule-4601.pdf
District Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)
The project proponent may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving activities as described in Regulation VIII, specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities.

Should the project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5- acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). For additional information regarding the written notification or Dust Control Plan requirements, please contact District Compliance staff at (559) 230-5950.

The application for both the Construction Notification and Dust Control Plan can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/fm3jrbsq/dcp-form.docx Information about District Regulation VIII can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/dustcontrol
B/10 B/11
328
Section 9, Item A
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 7 District Reference No: 20260716
July 2, 2026
District Rule 4901 - Wood Burning Fireplaces and Heaters The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from wood burning fireplaces, wood burning heaters, and outdoor wood burning devices. This rule establishes limitations on the installation of new wood burning fireplaces and wood burning heaters.

Specifically, at elevations below 3,000 feet in areas with natural gas service, no person shall install a wood burning fireplace, low mass fireplace, masonry heater, or wood burning heater.

Information about District Rule 4901 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/residential-wood-smoke-reductionprogram/ Other District Rules and Regulations
The Project may also be subject to the following District rules: Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).

District Comment Letter
The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.

For future environmental documents (e.g., Mitigated Negative Declarations or Draft Environmental Impact Reports), the District recommends that the City include the District in distribution list for review.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Dylan Casares by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (559) 230-6574.

Sincerely,
Mark Montelongo
Director of Policy and Government Affairs
For: Daniel Martinez
Program Manager
B/12B/13 B/14
329
Section 9, Item A
Appendix A – HARP2 Results
330
Section 9, Item A
**HARP - Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool v22118
**7/7/2026
**Exported Risk Results
REC GRP NETID X Y RISK_SUM SCENARIO INHAL_RISKSOIL_RISK DERMAL_RISKMMILK_RISKWATER_RISKFISH_RISK CROP_RISKBEEF_RISK DAIRY_RISKPIG_RISK CHICKEN_RISK EGG_RISK 1 SENSITIV 258880 4055351 3.48E-10 4YrCancerDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 3.48E-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SENSITIV 259340 4055495 5.22E-10 4YrCancerDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 5.22E-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 SENSITIV 259136 4055753 1.18E-08 4YrCancerDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 1.18E-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction - Cancer
331
Section 9, Item A
**HARP - Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool v22118
**7/7/2026
**Exported Risk Results

REC GRP NETID X Y SCENARIO CV CNS IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE BONE/TEETHENDO BLOOD ODOR GENERAL MAXHI 1 SENSITIV 258880 4055351 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.66E-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.66E-07 2 SENSITIV 259340 4055495 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.49E-07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.49E-07 3 SENSITIV 259136 4055753 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.61E-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.61E-06 Construction - Chronic
332
Section 9, Item A
**HARP - Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool v22118
**7/7/2026
**Exported Risk Results

REC GRP NETID X Y SCENARIO CV CNS IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE BONE/TEETHENDO BLOOD ODOR GENERAL MAXHI 1 SENSITIV 258880 4055351 NonCancerAcute 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SENSITIV 259340 4055495 NonCancerAcute 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 SENSITIV 259136 4055753 NonCancerAcute 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Construction - Acute
333
Section 9, Item A
**HARP - Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool v22118
**7/7/2026
**Exported Risk Results
REC GRP NETID X Y RISK_SUM SCENARIO INHAL_RISKSOIL_RISK DERMAL_RISKMMILK_RISKWATER_RISKFISH_RISK CROP_RISKBEEF_RISK DAIRY_RISKPIG_RISK CHICKEN_RISK EGG_RISK 1 SENSITIV 258880 4055351 1.17E-10 66YrCancerDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk_FAH16to70 1.17E-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SENSITIV 259340 4055495 1.75E-10 66YrCancerDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk_FAH16to70 1.75E-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 SENSITIV 259136 4055753 3.95E-09 66YrCancerDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk_FAH16to70 3.95E-09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Operations - Cancer
334
Section 9, Item A
**HARP - Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool v22118
**7/7/2026
**Exported Risk Results

REC GRP NETID X Y SCENARIO CV CNS IMMUN KIDNEY GILV REPRO/DEVEL RESP SKIN EYE BONE/TEETHENDO BLOOD ODOR GENERAL MAXHI 1 SENSITIV 258880 4055351 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.05E-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.05E-08 2 SENSITIV 259340 4055495 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.08E-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.08E-08 3 SENSITIV 259136 4055753 NonCancerChronicDerived_InhSoilDermMMilk 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.37E-06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.37E-06 Operations - Chronic
335
Section 9, Item A
**HARP - Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Tool v22118
**7/7/2026
**Exported Risk Results

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOWLER DENYING THE

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSED AS PART OF PLANNING PROJECT NO. 25-30.

WHEREAS, Yamabe & Horn Engineering, on behalf of Joseph Crown and Crown Homes (“Applicant”), has proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 6519 (“Project”), as well as a request to amend the General Plan land use designation of, prezone, and annex Assessor’s Parcel Number 345-100-08S (“Project Site”) to the City of Fowler (“Planning Project No. 25-30”); and WHEREAS, the Project proposes to subdivide the Project site into 183 single family residential lots, a 90,300 square foot (“sqft”) park, landscape areas including internal paseos and a trail, as well as other site improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Project site comprises a 39.93-acre parcel, located at the northwest corner of East Parlier Avenue and South Sunnyside Avenue, that is designated as Low Density Residential (“LDR”) by the City of Fowler General Plan, and is zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, the Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR to Medium Low Density Residential (“MLDR”); and WHEREAS, the Project proposes a density of 4.58 dwelling units per acre, which meets the density range of the MLDR land use designation; and WHEREAS, the Project site would be prezoned to the R-1-6 mapping zone district, with an implementing zone district of R-3 (Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the site’s MLDR land use designation; and
WHEREAS, the Project site would be annexed to the City of Fowler as a part of the Project; and
WHEREAS, prior to City approval of the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, a Williamson Act contract existing for the Project site must be tentatively cancelled with the County of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, approval of the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is contingent upon approval of the General Plan Amendment and prezoning; and WHEREAS, due to the proposed General Plan Amendment, the City has found that the Project was not wholly analyzed as part of the General Plan Environmental Impact Report certified for the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared, circulated, and made available for public comment pursuant to the California Environmental 337
Section 9, Item A
Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000, et seq.; and Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15000, et seq.); and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was published in the July 24, 2026, edition of The Business Journal, posted at City Hall and the City’s website, and sent to interested parties via email; and
WHEREAS, at a special meeting on July 9, 2026, at 6:30 pm, the Fowler Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Project and determined that the proposed subdivision was inconsistent with the intent of the General Plan because it would result in a development pattern characterized by lot sizes smaller than those which would be allowed to be developed under the Low Density Residential land use, recommending denial of the proposed General Plan Amendment to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the item was scheduled to be considered by the City Council at its regular meeting on August 4, 2026, but was continued to the August 18, 2026, regular City Council meeting due to a lack of quorum; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on August 18, 2026, at 6:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as the item could be heard, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all evidence presented at the City Council’s regular meeting at August 18, 2026, including oral and written public testimony on the Project (“Administrative Record”), which is incorporated by this reference herein.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fowler, based upon the entire Administrative Record of proceedings, hereby resolves as follows:

1. That the City Council makes the following findings pursuant to Fowler Zoning Ordinance Section 9.45.070:
a. The amendment is not consistent with the intent of the General Plan vision statement and supporting principles, goals, and policies. b. The amendment prescribes reasonable controls and standards for affected land uses to ensure compatibility and integrity of those uses with other established uses.
c. The amendment provides for the protection of the general health, safety, and/or welfare of the community.

2. That the proposed Prezone, Annexation, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map cannot move forward without approval of the General Plan Amendment.

3. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a), CEQA does not apply to projects 338
Section 9, Item A
which a public agency disapproves.

4. The City Council was unable to affirmatively make all the requisite findings to recommend approval of the Project.

5. The bases for these findings are detailed in the August 18, 2026, staff report, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing which are hereby incorporated by reference.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August 2026, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Fowler by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:
___________________________
Juan Mejia, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Angela Vasquez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:__________________________
ROY C. SANTOS, City Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
339
Section 9, Item A

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE: August 18, 2026
FROM: SOO HO PARK, City Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSIDER accepting the Fresno Street Reconstruction Project and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

Staff Recommendation: Accept the project as complete.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Don Berry Construction, Inc has completed the 4
th and 5th Street Improvements Project.

Consider accepting the project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
On March 3, 2026, the City Council awarded Don Berry Construction, Inc. a contract in the amount of $1,032,052.57 for the Fresno Street Reconstruction project with an additional 10% in contingency funding to address and changes or unforeseen conditions.

The project consisted of pavement rehabilitation, concrete improvements, and signing and striping on Fresno Street between 3rd Street to 7th Street and 1st Street between Merced and Main Street. The project also included new bike lanes and facilities in the downtown areas on either side of Golden State Boulevard between Merced and Fresno Streets on 10th, 9th, 7th, 4th, 3rd, and 2nd Streets; 5th Street between Adams Avenue and Fresno Street; Main Street between 10th Street and Adams Avenue; and Fresno Street between 10th Street and 3rd Street.

During construction various change orders were processed to accommodate field conditions or unforeseen conditions experienced by the contractor. The most significant change order was due to of a water main break which required the contractor to perform extra work and change the pavement reconstruction method and materials to a conventional asphalt concrete and base rock section for a portion of the project on Fresno Street between 4 th and 6th streets.

After the incorporating all change orders, the total project cost is $1,090,663.10 which is within the 10% contingency funding authorized by City Council at contract award. 340
Section 9, Item B
With the Project completed, City staff recommends that the City Council accept the Fresno Street Reconstruction Construction Project and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

PUBLIC NOTICE
This item does not require a public hearing and was noticed as a part of the City Council Agenda.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1) exemption regarding existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This action is consistent with:

General Plan Goal MOB-1
Fowler’s streets are a safe and enjoyable environment for pedestrians, cyclists, motorists, and people of all ages and abilities.

General Plan Goal MOB-11
Ensure street and road projects are adequately designed to accommodate safe and convenient pedestrian and bicyclist access.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was funded through the Measure C TOD grant awarded for the Bikeway to Transit Project, SB1 Funds, and LTF 8 Funds.

PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The construction contract was previously awarded by the City Council following a competitive bid process.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Staff is not aware of any conflicts of interest.
341
Section 9, Item B

Fowler City CouncilAugust 18, 2026

Fowler City Council
August 18, 2026