Cities Index.
22-876 ATP Prioritization Results

Fresno City Council
June 9, 2022

Document
22-876 ATP Prioritization Results
Meeting
June 9, 2022
Body
Fresno City Council
Original file
103 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar2.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Score Description
Williams
Elementary Safe
Routes to
School
Palm Bikeway
to the San
Joaquin River
Parkway
Downtown
Neighborhood
Safe Schools
Crossing
First Street
Phase 3
Protected
Bikeway
Midtown Trail
Tunnel and
Regional
Connectivity
Project
Project Score Project Score Project Score Project Score Project Score 5 Project addresses an accessibility complaint from a person with a disability filed with the office of the ADA Coordinator.
4 Project addresses multiple existing barriers to access identified by the City of Fresno's ADA Transition Plan for the Public Right of Way or confirmed by the ADA Coordinator.
2 Project address a single existing barrier to access identified by the City of Fresno's ADA Transition Plan for the Public Right of Way or confirmed by the ADA Coordinator.
0 Project does not address any existing barriers to access. 18 determined by the CalEnviroScreen tool (score falls into 96 to 100 percentile range).
13 Project is located within disadvantaged census tracts as determined by the CalEnviroScreen tool (score falls into 91 to 96 percentile range). 8 Project is located within 1/2 mile radius of disadvantaged census tracts as determined by the CalEnviroScreen tool.
0 Project does not provide direct access to disadvantaged community. 5 Identified as a high priority in the Active Transportation Plan. 4 Identified projects on behalf of the community through means such as FresGo and 621-City, community petitions, requests to City Staff and Council Members and community based organizations.
3 Requested as part of a community planning process or adopted plan in the last 5 years.
0 Not identified through a community planning process in the last 5 years or is identified as a low priority in the Active Transportation Plan. 2 50%.
0 50%.

Total: 30 T o t a l : 1 61 22 72 12 7
Project Score Project Score Project Score Project Score Project Score 3 Fills a network gap between any two existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities. 2 Connects with one existing bicycle or pedestrian facility. 0 Provides no connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities or is immediately adjacent to existing and equivalent alternative path of travel. 15 Provides direct access to two or more K-12 schools within 1/4 mile radius of the project.
12 project.
9 Provides direct access to two or more K-12 schools within 1/2 mile radius of the project.
6 project.
0 Does not provide access to a K-12 school.
4 Located within 1/2 mile of public transportation including: FAX, Amtrak, Greyhound or High Speed Rail station.
0 Does not provide direct access to public transit.
4 Project is located within 1/4 mile of an existing park. 4 Project is not located within 1/2 mile of a park and is located within a community where for every 1,000 residents there are 1.02 acres of parkland or less.
2 Project is located within 1/2 mile of an existing park. 0 Project is not located near existing parks.

Active Transportation Project Prioritization Tool
4 18
5 0
3 15
4 4
4 8
4 0
3 12
4 4C-4 Connectivity to Parks 44 4
C-3 Connectivity to
Public Transit 44 4
C-2 Connectivity to
Schools 91 5 1 5
3 A-4 Vehicle Ownership 00 0
Connectivity
C-1 Connectivity to
Existing Network 00
A-3 Community Identified
Priority 43 5
Variables
Access and Equity
A-1 Accessib ility 00 4
A-2 Equity 81 8 1 8
Score Description
Williams
Elementary Safe
Routes to
School
Palm Bikeway
to the San
Joaquin River
Parkway
Downtown
Neighborhood
Safe Schools
Crossing
First Street
Phase 3
Protected
Bikeway
Midtown Trail
Tunnel and
Regional
Connectivity
Project
Active Transportation Project Prioritization Tool
Variables
4 Located within 1/4 mile of grocery store, health provider, civic center, large employment center or other regional destination.
4 Project is not located within 1 mile of grocery store, health provider, civic center, large employment center or other regional destination. 3 Located within 1/2 mile of grocery store, health provider, civic center, large employment center or other regional destination.
0 Does not directly provide access to an activity center. 2 Fills a bikeway network gap between an existing and a funded near term (5 years) proposed facility of any type.
0 Does not provide access to an existing bikeway or shared use paths. 1 Provides connectivity within 1/4 mile of regional network in one or more neighboring jurisdiction(s).
0 network.
2 Anchored place type - location efficiency factors will increase over time; land use supports high levels of non-motorized travel and transit use. 0 Transitional place type - location currently "evolving", likelihood of future development of the adjacent property.

Total: 35 Total: 31 26 33 31 35
2 4
0 1
2 4
22 C-7 Regional
Significance 10 1
C-8 Place Type 2
C-6 Connectivity to
Future Network 22 2
C-5
Connectivity to Key
Destinations -
excludes schools & parks
44 4
2 0
Score Description
Williams
Elementary Safe
Routes to
School
Palm Bikeway
to the San
Joaquin River
Parkway
Downtown
Neighborhood
Safe Schools
Crossing
First Street
Phase 3
Protected
Bikeway
Midtown Trail
Tunnel and
Regional
Connectivity
Project
Active Transportation Project Prioritization Tool
Variables
Project Score Project Score Project Score Project Score Project Score 20 One fatality reported within 1/4 mile of project area in the last five years AND the proposed project provides countermeasures appropriate to collision type as determined by the Local Roadway Safety Manual.
15 Three or more bicycle or pedestrian related collisions reported with 1/4 mile of proposed project area in the last five years AND the proposed project provides countermeasures appropriate to collision type as determined by the Local Roadway Safety Manual.
10 Two bicycle or pedestrian related collisions reported within 1/4 mile of proposed project area in the last five years AND the project provides countermeasures appropriate to collision type as determined by the Local Roadway Safety Manual.
8 One bicycle or pedestrian related collision reported within 1/4 mile of proposed project area in the last five years AND project provides countermeasures appropriate to collision type as determined by the Local Roadway Safety Manual.
0 Proposed path that did not experience any bicycle or pedestrian related collisions within 1/4 mile of the project area in the last five years AND/OR the proposed project does not provide countermeasures appropriate to collision type(s) as determined by the Local Roadway Safety Manual. 4 Project is ≥ 1 mile in length for Class II or IV facilities or project is ≥ 1/2 mile for Class I or sidewalk facilities or project creates a controlled crossing. 0 Project does not meet above project type criteria.
7 Greatest greenhouse gas reduction benefits anticipated, ADT on immediately adjacent corridor ≥ 24,000 vehicles.
6 Greenhouse gas reduction benefits anticipated, current ADT on immediately adjacent corridor <24,000 to 12,001 vehicles.
4 Greenhouse gas reduction benefits anticipated, current ADT on immediately adjacent corridor ≤12,000.
0 Greenhouse gas reduction benefits negligible, current ADT on immediately adjacent corridor ≤1000 to vehicles.
4 Population ≥ 30,000 within 1/2 mile radius of proposed project. 3 Population ≥ 20,000 within 1/2 mile radius of proposed project. 2 Population ≥ 10,000 within 1/2 mile radius of proposed project. 1 Population > 1,000 to 9,999 within 1/2 mile radius of proposed project. 0 Population ≤ 1,000 within 1/2 mile radius of proposed project.

Total: 35 Total: 14 23 32 34 15
100 Grand Total Score(s): 61 61 92 86 77
8 0
4 2
20 4
6 2
T-3
Potential for Mode
Shift and
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction
76 7
T-2 Project Type 44 4
020
Adopted by Council - March 2, 2017
T-4 Location Efficiency:

Population Density 24 4
Total Points Available:

Traffic Control, Mode Shift and User Comfort
T-1 Bicycle or Pedestrian
Collisions 10

← All documents from this meeting