Attachment 2 - Negative Declaration EA No. P19-04891.pdf — Fresno City Council, June 9, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0161

0.0000

0.0161
Total

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0161

0.0000

0.0161
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 22 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
Unmitigated

0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
General Light Industry

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total

0.00 0.00

0.00 Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
General Light Industry

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
92 5
3 5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
General Light Industry

0.492212

0.031147

0.169820

0.116157

0.015815

0.004502

0.033398

0.126328

0.002363

0.001519

0.005062

0.001083

0.000594
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 23 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
General Light
Industry
313050

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Total

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 24 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Total

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Mitigated

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Light
Industry
132300

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Total

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 25 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0690

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9000e-
004
Unmitigated

0.0690

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9000e-
004

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Light
Industry
132300

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Total

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 26 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0104

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0586

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9000e-
004
Total

0.0690

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9000e-
004
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0104

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0586

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9000e-
004
Total

0.0690

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9000e-
004
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 27 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Unmitigated

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

3.46875 /
0 6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Total

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Unmitigated

7.0 Water Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 28 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

3.46875 /
0 6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Total

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Unmitigated

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 29 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

18.6 3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Total

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

18.6 3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Total

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 30 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:11 PM

Page 31 of 32 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase -
Demolition -
Trips and VMT - No demolition is required.

Vehicle Trips - The facility is unmanned and does not have any employees or visitors.

Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Emission Factors -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Light Industry

15.00 1000sqft

0.34 15,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2005
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35

0.029
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Pump Station 372
Fresno County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 1 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior
250
150
tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior
250
150
tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Residential_Exterior
250
150
tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Residential_Interior
250
150
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 2 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2005

0.3700

1.1877

0.5946

8.4200e-
003

4.9600e-
003

0.0971

0.1020

1.5100e-
003

0.0970

0.0985

0.0000

76.9329

0.0167

0.0000

77.3499
Maximum

0.3700

1.1877

0.5946

8.4200e-
003

4.9600e-
003

0.0971

0.1020

1.5100e-
003

0.0970

0.0985

0.0000

76.9329

0.0167

0.0000

77.3499
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2005

0.3700

1.1877

0.5946

8.4200e-
003

4.9600e-
003

0.0971

0.1020

1.5100e-
003

0.0970

0.0985

0.0000

76.9328

0.0167

0.0000

77.3498
Maximum

0.3700

1.1877

0.5946

8.4200e-
003

4.9600e-
003

0.0971

0.1020

1.5100e-
003

0.0970

0.0985

0.0000

76.9328

0.0167

0.0000

77.3498
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 3 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.0690

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Energy

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

55.1931

2.0600e-
003

6.7000e-
004

55.4432
Mobile

0.1656

1.1266

1.5689

8.2200e-
003

0.0885

0.0278

0.1163

0.0239

0.0266

0.0505

0.0000
159.2768
159.2768

0.0410

0.0000
160.3005
Waste

0.0000

3.7756

0.0000

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Water

0.0000

1.1005

5.4602

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Total

0.2363

1.1419

1.5819

8.3100e-
003

0.0885

0.0290

0.1175

0.0239

0.0278

0.0517

4.8761
219.9305
224.8066

0.3794

3.3900e-
003
235.3012
Unmitigated Operational
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 1-3-2005
4-2-2005

0.7438

0.7438
2 4-3-2005
7-2-2005

0.8023

0.8023
Highest

0.8023

0.8023
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 4 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.0690

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Energy

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

55.1931

2.0600e-
003

6.7000e-
004

55.4432
Mobile

0.1656

1.1266

1.5689

8.2200e-
003

0.0885

0.0278

0.1163

0.0239

0.0266

0.0505

0.0000
159.2768
159.2768

0.0410

0.0000
160.3005
Waste

0.0000

3.7756

0.0000

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Water

0.0000

1.1005

5.4602

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Total

0.2363

1.1419

1.5819

8.3100e-
003

0.0885

0.0290

0.1175

0.0239

0.0278

0.0517

4.8761
219.9305
224.8066

0.3794

3.3900e-
003
235.3012
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 5 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
1/3/2005
1/14/2005
5 10
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
1/15/2005
1/17/2005
5 1
3 Grading
Grading
1/18/2005
1/19/2005
5 2
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
1/20/2005
6/8/2005
5 100
5 Paving
Paving
6/9/2005
6/15/2005
5 5
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
6/16/2005
6/22/2005
5 5
OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 22,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 7,500; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 6 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
4 6.00
9 0.56
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Grading
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 4.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
2 6.00
89 0.20
Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 7.00
130

0.42 Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 1.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 1.00
247

0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 6.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 6.00
97 0.37
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 7.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
2 5.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
5 6.00

2.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 1.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 7 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0157

0.0935

0.0444

6.6000e-
004

8.0100e-
003

0.0000

5.6973

1.2800e-
003

0.0000

5.7293
Total

0.0157

0.0935

0.0444

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0100e-
003

0.0000

8.0100e-
003

0.0000

5.6973

1.2800e-
003

0.0000

5.7293
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 8 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

7.8000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

6.9400e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.4170

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.4182
Total

7.8000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

6.9400e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.4170

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.4182
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0157

0.0935

0.0444

6.6000e-
004

8.0100e-
003

0.0000

5.6973

1.2800e-
003

0.0000

5.7293
Total

0.0157

0.0935

0.0444

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0100e-
003

0.0000

8.0100e-
003

0.0000

5.6973

1.2800e-
003

0.0000

5.7293
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 9 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

7.8000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

6.9400e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.4170

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.4182
Total

7.8000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

6.9400e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.4170

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.4182
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.0000e-
003

7.9300e-
003

2.8000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.5117

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.5138
Total

1.0000e-
003

7.9300e-
003

2.8000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

2.7000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

5.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.5117

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.5138
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 10 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.3 Site Preparation - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Total

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.0000e-
003

7.9300e-
003

2.8000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.5117

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.5138
Total

1.0000e-
003

7.9300e-
003

2.8000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

2.7000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

5.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.5117

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.5138
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 11 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.3 Site Preparation - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Total

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

7.5000e-
004

0.0000

7.5000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000

4.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.1400e-
003

0.0187

8.8800e-
003

1.3000e-
004

1.6000e-
003

0.0000

1.1395

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.1459
Total

3.1400e-
003

0.0187

8.8800e-
003

1.3000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

1.6000e-
003

2.3500e-
003

4.1000e-
004

1.6000e-
003

2.0100e-
003

0.0000

1.1395

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.1459
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 12 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.6000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.3900e-
003

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0834

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0837
Total

1.6000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.3900e-
003

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0834

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0837
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

7.5000e-
004

0.0000

7.5000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

0.0000

4.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.1400e-
003

0.0187

8.8800e-
003

1.3000e-
004

1.6000e-
003

0.0000

1.1395

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.1459
Total

3.1400e-
003

0.0187

8.8800e-
003

1.3000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

1.6000e-
003

2.3500e-
003

4.1000e-
004

1.6000e-
003

2.0100e-
003

0.0000

1.1395

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.1459
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 13 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.6000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.3900e-
003

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0834

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0837
Total

1.6000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.3900e-
003

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0834

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0837
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1579

0.9706

0.4395

6.8700e-
003

0.0815

0.0000

60.0010

0.0129

0.0000

60.3232
Total

0.1579

0.9706

0.4395

6.8700e-
003

0.0815

0.0000

60.0010

0.0129

0.0000

60.3232
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 14 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

3.2000e-
003

0.0350

0.0157

2.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

1.0200e-
003

1.6900e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

2.7776

1.0400e-
003

0.0000

2.8035
Worker

4.6600e-
003

4.5300e-
003

0.0417

3.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.4500e-
003

6.4000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

6.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.5018

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.5094
Total

7.8600e-
003

0.0396

0.0574

2.9000e-
004

3.0600e-
003

1.0700e-
003

4.1400e-
003

8.3000e-
004

1.0300e-
003

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

5.2794

1.3400e-
003

0.0000

5.3130
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1579

0.9706

0.4395

6.8700e-
003

0.0815

0.0000

60.0009

0.0129

0.0000

60.3231
Total

0.1579

0.9706

0.4395

6.8700e-
003

0.0815

0.0000

60.0009

0.0129

0.0000

60.3231
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 15 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

3.2000e-
003

0.0350

0.0157

2.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

1.0200e-
003

1.6900e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.8000e-
004

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

2.7776

1.0400e-
003

0.0000

2.8035
Worker

4.6600e-
003

4.5300e-
003

0.0417

3.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.4500e-
003

6.4000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

6.9000e-
004

0.0000

2.5018

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.5094
Total

7.8600e-
003

0.0396

0.0574

2.9000e-
004

3.0600e-
003

1.0700e-
003

4.1400e-
003

8.3000e-
004

1.0300e-
003

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

5.2794

1.3400e-
003

0.0000

5.3130
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

6.9900e-
003

0.0450

0.0213

3.3000e-
004

3.4000e-
003

0.0000

2.7483

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.7625
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

6.9900e-
003

0.0450

0.0213

3.3000e-
004

3.4000e-
003

0.0000

2.7483

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.7625
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 16 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

7.0000e-
004

6.8000e-
004

6.2500e-
003

0.0000

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3753

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3764
Total

7.0000e-
004

6.8000e-
004

6.2500e-
003

0.0000

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3753

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3764
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

6.9900e-
003

0.0450

0.0213

3.3000e-
004

3.4000e-
003

0.0000

2.7483

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.7625
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

6.9900e-
003

0.0450

0.0213

3.3000e-
004

3.4000e-
003

0.0000

2.7483

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.7625
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 17 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

7.0000e-
004

6.8000e-
004

6.2500e-
003

0.0000

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3753

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3764
Total

7.0000e-
004

6.8000e-
004

6.2500e-
003

0.0000

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.3753

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3764
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.1738

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.8800e-
003

0.0107

5.2000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.6383

1.5000e-
004

0.0000

0.6422
Total

0.1757

0.0107

5.2000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.6383

1.5000e-
004

0.0000

0.6422
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 18 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Total

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.1738

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.8800e-
003

0.0107

5.2000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.6383

1.5000e-
004

0.0000

0.6422
Total

0.1757

0.0107

5.2000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.6383

1.5000e-
004

0.0000

0.6422
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 19 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2005
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Total

4.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0209

0.0000

0.0209
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 20 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.1656

1.1266

1.5689

8.2200e-
003

0.0885

0.0278

0.1163

0.0239

0.0266

0.0505

0.0000
159.2768
159.2768

0.0410

0.0000
160.3005
Unmitigated

0.1656

1.1266

1.5689

8.2200e-
003

0.0885

0.0278

0.1163

0.0239

0.0266

0.0505

0.0000
159.2768
159.2768

0.0410

0.0000
160.3005

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
General Light Industry
104.55

19.80 10.20
230,537
230,537
Total
104.55

19.80 10.20
230,537
230,537
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
General Light Industry

9.50 7.30

7.30 59.00

28.00 13.00
92 5
3 5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
General Light Industry

0.415876

0.061183

0.150996

0.176036

0.035163

0.006973

0.031964

0.109874

0.002099

0.001787

0.005269

0.001212

0.001569
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 21 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Total

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 22 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Total

1.6900e-
003

0.0154

0.0129

9.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

16.7055

3.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

16.8048
Mitigated

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Light
Industry
132300

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Total

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 23 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0690

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Unmitigated

0.0690

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Light
Industry
132300

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Total

38.4876

1.7400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

38.6384
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 24 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

7.0 Water Detail

0.0104

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0586

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Total

0.0690

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0104

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0586

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Total

0.0690

0.0000

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 25 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Unmitigated

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

3.46875 /
0 6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Total

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Unmitigated

7.0 Water Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 26 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

3.46875 /
0 6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Total

6.5607

0.1133

2.7200e-
003

10.2032
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Unmitigated

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 27 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

18.6 3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Total

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Light
Industry

18.6 3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Total

3.7756

0.2231

0.0000

9.3540
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Date: 4/21/2021 1:36 PM

Page 28 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation

Page 29 of 30 ends

Pump Station 372 - Fresno County, Annual

City of Fresno – Water Well Pump Station No. 372
Public Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration 130
Appendix B: Biological Resources Memo
Prepared by Argonaut Ecological Consulting, Inc. on March 10, 2021.

Environmental Review - Biological/Wetland Studies - Permitting Technical Memorandum To: Jenna Chilingerian, Associate Planner Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. From: Kathy Kinsland, Senior Biologist Subject: Biological Evaluation of the Proposed City of Fresno Pump Station 372 The proposed Pump Station 372 is located at 3709 S. Northpointe Drive, Fresno, California (Assessor’s Parcel No. 330-021-75ST). The Project entails drilling a new water well, constructing a perimeter masonry block wall, metal gates, a 29’ X 9-4” equipment building to house electrical panels and chemical injection equipment, a telemetry antenna, and installation of perimeter landscaping for screening. The site is sized and configured to accept the future installation of an emergency generator and water treatment facilities, including an iron and manganese filtration system, granulated activated carbon (GAC) treatment system, and a de-aeration tank if deemed necessary. The pump station study area is roughly 0.3 acres in size (See Figure 1). Argonaut Ecological Consulting, Inc. conducted a site review on March 10, 2021. Before the field review, we reviewed the California Natural Diversity Database to determine the known locations of potential special status species and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetland Inventory Maps to determine the location mapped wetlands and water features. There are no known special status species records on or adjacent to near the Study Area and no mapped water features except for the stormwater basin immediately south of the Study Area. Based on available aerial photography, the site appears to be highly disturbed from recent adjacent site development. The field review confirmed the accuracy of the recent aerial photography. The site is within the boundary of an existing construction site. At the time of the site visit, there was no active construction. A large backhoe was staged in the center of the Study Area. The entire Study Area, including the adjacent padded building site, was devoid of vegetation except for a few weedy species in the southeast corner and under the chain-link fence along the south boundary (see attached photographs). The weeds consisted of upland species associated with highly disturbed sites (Bermuda grass primarily). The surface soils are sandy. The east boundary is fenced, and a construction entrance is immediately north of the Study Area. No wildlife or wildlife habitat is present. No wildlife species were encountered during the review. Construction of the proposed Pump Station 372 would not have any impact on wildlife habitat, special status species or their habitat, or aquatic features. Our finding is that further biological studies are warranted or needed.

Photographic Documentation

Client: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. Prepared by: Argonaut Ecological, Inc.

Location: Prime/Northpoint Drive Fresno, CA Photographer K. Kinsland Site Name: Pump Station 372
Photograph Date: 03/1/221

1 Photo 1: View south from Northpoint Avenue toward Study Area and construction entrance.

Photographic Documentation

Client: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. Prepared by: Argonaut Ecological, Inc.

Location: Prime/Northpoint Drive Fresno, CA Photographer K. Kinsland Site Name: Pump Station 372
Photograph Date: 03/1/221

2 Photo 2: Photograph taken from just inside fence line, looking south at Study Area. .

Photographic Documentation

Client: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. Prepared by: Argonaut Ecological, Inc.

Location: Prime/Northpoint Drive Fresno, CA Photographer K. Kinsland Site Name: Pump Station 372
Photograph Date: 03/1/221

3 Photo 3: View of eastern edge of Study Area showing some existing utility structures

Photographic Documentation

Client: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. Prepared by: Argonaut Ecological, Inc.

Location: Prime/Northpoint Drive Fresno, CA Photographer K. Kinsland Site Name: Pump Station 372
Photograph Date: 03/1/221

4 Photo 4: View of southern edge of Study Area (stormwater basin in background).

Photographic Documentation

Client: Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. Prepared by: Argonaut Ecological, Inc.

Location: Prime/Northpoint Drive Fresno, CA Photographer K. Kinsland Site Name: Pump Station 372
Photograph Date: 03/1/221

5 Photo 5: View of northern edge of Study Area. Gravel area is part of construction entrance.

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/[email protected]

PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC.

CONSULTING ARCHEOLOGY

April 6, 2021

Jenna Chilingerian, Associate Planner
Precision Civil Engineering, Inc.
1234 "O" Street
Fresno, CA 93721

Subject: Pump Station 372

Dear Ms. Chilingerian:

Project Description:

Pump Station 372 is located at 3709 S. Northpointe Drive, Fresno, California (Assessor’s Parcel No. 330-021-75ST). The Project entails drilling a new water well, construction of a perimeter masonry block wall, metal gates, a 29’ X 9-4” equipment building to house electrical panels and chemical injection equipment, a telemetry antenna, and installation of perimeter landscaping for screening. The site is sized and configured to accept future installation of an emergency generator and water treatment facilities including an iron and manganese filtration system, granulated activated carbon (GAC) treatment system, and a de-aeration tank, if deemed necessary.

Record Search:

Peak & Associates conducted a records search through the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center for the proposed site of the pumping station and a 0.125-mile radius around the site (Search no. 21-202, attached). The western one-third of the small site had been surveyed in 2014 for the South Fresno Economic Development Project Work Area.

No sites were found in the portion of the project area surveyed. The closest resource is a segment of the Central Canal, about 0.1 miles south of the project area, recorded as P-10- 004677.

Map Review:

The 1923 Fresno South USGS topographic map shows no natural water courses in proximity to the project area, suggesting it would not be a desirable location for prehistoric period occupation or use. Later Fresno South USGS topographic maps (1946, 1963, 1972) do not indicate any buildings or structures in or near the project area.

• 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20#329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762/Phone: (916)939-2405/[email protected] • 3161 Godman Avenue, Suite A, Chico, CA 95973/Phone: (530)342-2800/[email protected]

Conclusions:

Based on the previous survey and the low sensitivity of the project site, we do not believe additional survey is warranted for the pump station. As always, should artifacts or unusual amounts of stone, bone, or shell be uncovered during construction activities, an archeologist should be consulted for on-the-spot evaluation. If the bone appears to be human, state law requires that the Fresno County Coroner be contacted. If the Coroner determines that the bone is human and is most likely Native American in origin, they must contact the Native American Heritage Commission (916-322-7791).

Sincerely,

Melinda A. Peak

Melinda A Peak
Principal Investigator

City of Fresno – Water Well Pump Station No. 372
Public Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration 131
Appendix C: Cultural Resources Memo
Prepared by Peak & Associates, Inc. on April 6, 2021.

City of Fresno – Water Well Pump Station No. 372
Public Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration 132
Appendix D: MEIR Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist For EA No. P19-04891 and prepared on June 21, 2021.

MEIR Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist for EA No. P19-04891 June 2021

INCORPORATING MEASURES FROM THE MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (MEIR) CERTIFIED FOR THE CITY OF FRESNO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE (SCH No. 2012111015) A - Incorporated into Project
B - Mitigated
C - Mitigation in Progress
. D - Responsible Agency Contacted
E - Part of City-wide Program
F - Not Applicable

The timing of implementing each mitigation measure is identified in in the checklist, as well as identifies the entity responsible for verifying that the mitigation measure s applied to a project are performed . Project applicants are respon sible f or provi ding evidence that mitigation measures are implemented. As lead agency, the City of Fresno is responsible for verifying that mitigation is performed/completed.

Page 1 ends

This mitigation measure m onitoring and reporting checklist was prep ared pur suant to California Environmental Quality Act (C EQA) Guidelines Section 15097 and Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code (PRC). It was certified as part of the Fresno City Council’s approval of the MEIR for the Fresno General Plan update (Fresno City Council Resolution 2014-225, adopted December 18, 2014).

Letter designations to the right of each MEIR mitigation measure listed in this Exhibit note how the mitigation measure relates to the environmental assessment of the above -listed project, according to the key found at right and at the bottoms of the following pages:

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Aesthetics:

AES-1. Lighting systems for street and parking areas shall include shields to direct light to the roadway surfaces and parking areas. Vertical shields on the light fixtures shall also be used to direct light away from adjacent light sensitive land uses such as residences.

Verification comments:

Prior to issuance
of building
permits
Public Works
Department
(PW) and
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

Aesthetics (continued):

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 2 ends

AES-2: Lighting systems for public facilities such as active play areas shall provide adequate illumination for the activity; however, low intensity light fixtures and shields shall be used to minimize spillover light onto adjacent properties.

Verification comments:

Prior to issuance
of building
permits
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

AES-3: Lighting systems for non -residential uses, not
including public facilities, shall provide shields on the light fixtures and ori ent the lighting sys tem away from adjacent properties. Low intensity light fixtures shall also be used if excessive spillover light onto adjacent properties will occur.

Verification comments:

Prior to issuance
of building
permits
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

AES-4: Lighting systems f or fr eestanding signs shall not exceed 100 foot Lamberts (FT -L) when adjacent to streets which have an average light intensity of less than 2.0
horizontal footcandles and shall not exceed 500 FT -L when adjacent to streets which have an average light intensity of 2.0 horizontal footcandles or greater.

Verification comments:

Prior to issuance
of building
permits
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 3 ends

Aesthetics (continued):

AES-5: Materials use d on building facades shall be non - reflective.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

Air Quality:

AIR-1: Projects that include five or more heavy -duty truck deliveries per day with s ensitive receptors located within 300 feet of the truck loading area shall provide a screening analysis to determine if the project has the potential to exceed criteria pollutant concentration based standards and
thresholds for NO2 and PM2.5. If projects exceed screening criteria, refined dispersion modeling and health risk
assessment shall be accomplished and if ne eded, mitigation measures to reduce impacts shall be included in the project to reduce the impacts to the extent feasible. Mitigation
measures include but are not limited to:
• Locate loading docks and truck access routes as far from sensitive receptors as reasonably possible considering site design limitations to comply with other City design standards. • Post signs requiring drivers to limit idling to 5 minutes or less.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 4 ends

Air Quality (continued):

AIR-2: Projects that result in an increased cancer risk of 10 in a million or exceed criter ia pollutant ambient air quality standards shall implement site -specific measures that reduce toxic air contaminant (TAC) exposure to reduce excess cancer risk to less than 10 in a million. Possible control measures include but are not limited to:
• Locate loading docks and truck access routes as far from sensitive receptors as reasonably possible considering site design limitations to comply with other City design standards. • Post signs requiring drivers to limit idling to 5 minutes or less • Construct block walls to reduce the flow of emissions toward sensitive receptors
• Install a vegetative barrier downwind from the TAC source that can absorb a portion of the diesel PM emissions
• For projects proposing to locate a new building containing sensitive receptors near existing sources of TAC emissions, install HEPA filters in HVAC systems to reduce TAC emission levels exceeding risk thresholds.
• Install h eating and cooling services at truck stops to eliminate the need for idling during overnight stops to r un onboard systems.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 5 ends

Air Quality (continued):

AIR-2 (continued from previous page)
• For large distribution centers where the owner controls the vehicle fleet, provide facilities to support alternative fueled trucks powered by fuels such as natural gas or bio-diesel • Utilize electric powered material handling equipment where feasible for the weight and volume of material to be moved.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

AIR-3: Require developers proposing projects on ARB’s list of projects in its Air Quality and Land Use Handbook (Handbook) warranting special consideration to prepare a cumulative health risk assessme nt when sensitive receptors are located within the distance screening criteria of the facility as listed in the ARB Handbook.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 6 ends

Air Quality (continued):

AIR-4: Require developers of projects containing sensitive receptors to provide a cumulative health risk assessment at project locations exceeding ARB Land Use Handbook
distance screening crit eria o r new er criteria that may be developed by th e San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD).

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

AIR-5: Require developers of projects with the potential to generate significant o dor impacts as determined through review of SJVAPCD odor complaint history for similar facilities and consultation with the SJVAPCD to prepare an odor
impact assessment and to implement odor control measures recommended by the SJVAPCD or the C ity to the ex tent needed to reduce the impact to less than significant.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 7 ends

Biological Resources:

BIO-1: Construction of a proposed project should avoid, where possible, vegetation communities that provide suitable habitat for a special -status species known to occur within the Planning Area. If construction within potentially suitable habitat must occur, the presence/absence of any special - status plant or wildlife sp ecies m ust be determined prior to construction, to determine if the habitat supports any special - status species. If special-status species are determined to occupy any portion of a project site, avoidance and
minimization measures shall be inc orporated in to the
construction phase of a project to avoid direct or incidental take of a listed species to the greatest extent feasible.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

BIO-2: Direct or incidental take of any state or federally listed species should be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. If construction of a proposed project will result in the direct or incidental take of a listed species, consultation with the resources agencies and/or additional permitting ma y be required. Agency consultation through the C alifornia
Department of Fish and Wildlife (C DFW) 2081 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) Section 7 or Section 10
permitting processes must take place prior to any action that (continued on next page)
Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 8 ends

Biological Resources (continued):

BIO-2 (continued from previous page)
may result in the direct or incidental take of a lis ted species.

Specific mitigation measures for direct or incidental impact s to a list ed spec ies will be determined on a case -by-case basis through agency consultation.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

BIO-3: Development w ithin the Planning Area should avoid, where possible, special -status natur al communit ies and vegetation communities that provide suitable habitat for special-status species. If a proposed project will result in the loss of a special -status natural communi ty or suitable habitat for special -status species, compensatory habitat -based mitigation is required under CEQA and the California
Endangered Species Act ( CESA). Mitigation will consist of preserving on -site habitat, restoring similar habitat or purchasing off-site credits from an approved mitigation bank.

Compensatory mitigat ion will be determined through
consultation with the City and/or resource agencies. An appropriate mitigation strategy and ratio will be agreed upon by the developer and lead agency to reduce project impacts to special-status natural communities to a less than significant (continued on next page)
Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 9 ends

Biological Resources (continued):

BIO-3 (continued from previous page):
level. Agreed-upon mitigation ratios will depend on the quality of the habitat and presence/absence of a special -status species. The specific mitigation for project level impacts will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

BIO-4: Proposed projects within the Planning A rea should avoid, if possible, construction within the general nesting season of February through August for avian species
protected under Fish and Game Code 3500 and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), if it is determined that suitable nesting habitat occurs on a pr oject site. If construction cannot avoid the nesting season, a pre -construction clearance survey must be conducted to determine if any ne sting birds or nesting activity is observed on or within 500-feet of a project site. If an active nest is observed during the survey, a biological monitor must be on site to ensure that no proposed project activities would impact the active nest. A suita ble buffer will be established around the active nest until the nestlings have fledged and the nest is no longer active. Project activities (continued on next page)
Prior to
development
project approval
and during
construction
activities
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 10 ends

Biological Resources (continued):

BIO-4 (continued from previous page):
may continue in the vicinity of the nest only at the discretion of the biological monitor.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

BIO-5: If a proposed project will result in the removal or impact to any riparian habitat and/or a special -status natural community with pote ntial t o occur in the Planning Area, compensatory habitat -based mitigation shall be required to reduce pr oject impacts. Compensatory mitigation must
involve the preservation or restoration or the purchase of off - site mitigation credits for impacts to ripa rian habitat and/or a special-status natural community. Mitigation must be
conducted in-kind or within an approved mitigation bank in the region. The specific mitigation ratio for habitat -based mitigation will be determined through consult ation with the appropriate agency ( i.e., CDFW or USFWS) on a case -by- case basis.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 11 ends

Biological Resources (continued):

BIO-6: Project impacts that occur to riparian habitat m ay also result in signi ficant impacts to streambeds or waterways protected under Section 1600 of Fish and Wildlife Code and Section 404 of the CWA. CDFW and/or USACE consultation, determination of mitigation strategy, and regulatory permitting to reduce i mpacts, as requ ired for projects that remove riparian habitat and/or alter a streambed or waterway, shall be implemented.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

BIO-7: Project-related impacts to riparian habitat or a special- status natu ral community may result in direct or incidental impacts to special -status species associated with riparian or wetland habitats. Project impacts to special -status species associated with riparian habitat shall be mitigated through agency consulta tion, dev elopment of a mitigation strategy, and/or issuing incidental take permits for the specific special - status species, as determined by the CDFW and/or USFWS.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 12 ends

Biological Resources (continued):

BIO-8: If a proposed project will result in the significant alteration or fill of a federally protected wetland, a formal wetland delineation conducted according to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) accepted met hodology is req uired for each project to determine the extent of wetlands on a project site. The delineation shall be used to determine if federal permitting and mitigation strategy are required to reduce project impacts. Acquisition of permits from USAC E for the fill of wetlands and USACE approval of a wetland mitigation plan would ensure a “no net loss” of wetland habitat within the Planning Area. Appropriate wetland mitigation/creation shall be implemented in a ratio according to the size of the
impacted wetland.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
project approval
Planning and
Development
Department
X

BIO-9: In addition to regulatory agency permitting, Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified from a list provided by the USACE shall be incorporated into the design and
construction phase of the project to ensure that no pollutants or siltation drain into a federally protected wetland. Project design features such as fencing, appropriate drainage and (continued on next page)
Prior to
development
project approval;
but for long-term
operational
BMPs, prior to
issuance of
occupancy
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 13 ends

Biological Resources (continued):

BIO-9 (continued from previous page):
incorporating detention basins shall assist in ensuring project- related impacts to wetland habitat are min imized to th e greatest extent feasible.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

Cultural Resources:

CUL-1: If previously unknown resources are encountered
before or during gradi ng activities, construction shall s top in the immed iate vicinit y of the find and a qualified historical resources specialist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified historical resources specialist shall m ake recommendations to the City on the measures tha t shall be i mplemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and th e City’s
Historic Preservation Ordinance.

If the re sources are determined to be unique historical resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines, measures shall be identified by the monitor and (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 14 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-1 (continued from previous page)
recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate measures for significant resources could includ e avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these .

Any historical artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided to a Ci ty-approved institution or person who is capable of providing long -germ preservation to allow future scientific study.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

CUL-2: Subsequent to a preliminary City review of th e project grading plans, if th ere is evidence that a project will include excavation or construction activities within previously undisturbed soils, a field survey and literature search for prehistoric archaeological resources shall be conducted. The following procedures shall be followed.

If prehistoric resour ces are not found during either the field survey or literature search, excavation and/or construction activities can commence. In the event that buried prehistoric (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 15 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-2 (continued from previous page)
archaeological re sources are discovered during excavation and/or construction activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vi cinity of th e find and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified archaeologist shall make recommendations to the City on the measures that shall be implemented t o protect the disco vered resour ces, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.

If the resources are determined to be unique prehistoric archaeological resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency.

Appropriate me asures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open sp ace, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agen cy approves the measures to protect these resources. Any prehistoric archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 16 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-2 (further continued from previous two pages)
to a City -approved institution or person who is capa ble of providing lo ng-term pres ervation to allow future scientific study.

If prehistoric resources are found during the field survey or literature review, the resources shall be inventoried using appropriate State record forms and submit the forms to the Southern San Joaquin Valley Info rmation Center. The
resources shall be evaluated for significance. If the resources are found to be significant, measures shal l be identified by the qualified archaeologist. Similar to above, appropriate mitigation measures for significant r esources cou ld include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

In addition, appropriate mitigation for excavation and
construction activities in t he vicinity of the resources fo und during the field survey or literature review shall include an archaeological monitor. The monitoring period shall be determined by the qualified archaeologist. If additional prehistoric archaeological resources are found during
(continued on next page)
[see Page 14] [see Page 14]

Cultural Resources (continued):

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 17 ends

CUL-2 (further continued from previous three pages)
excavation and/or construction activities, the procedure identified above for the discovery of unknown res ources shall be followed.

Verification comments:

[see Page 14] [see Page 14]

CUL-3: Subsequent to a preliminary City review of the project grading plans, if there is evidence that a project will include excavation or construction activities within pre viously undisturbed soils, a fi eld survey and literature search for unique paleontological/geological resources shall be
conducted. The following procedures shall be followed:

If unique paleontological/geological resources are not found during either the field survey or lit erature search, excavation and/or construction activities can commence. In the event that unique paleontological/geological resources are
discovered during excavation and/or construction activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified paleontologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified paleontologist shall make recommendations to the City on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 18 ends

CUL-3 (continued from previous page)
resources, including but not limited to, excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds. If the resources are determined to be significant, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lea d Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or ope n space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any paleontological/geological resources recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided to a City -approved institution or person who is capable of providing lo ng-term preservation to allow future scientific study.

If unique paleontological/geological resources are found during the field survey or literature review, the resources shall be inventoried and evaluated for significance. If the resources are found to be significant, mitigation measures shall be identified by the qualified paleontologist. Similar to above, appropriate mitigati on measures for sign ificant reso urces could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or op en space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. In addition, appropriate mitigation for excavation and construction activities in the vicinity of the (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 19 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-3 (further continued from previous two pages)
resources found during the field survey or literature review shall include a paleontological monitor. The monitoring period shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist. If additional paleontologic al/geological resources are found during excavation and/or construction activities, the procedure identified above for the disco very of unknown reso urces shall be followed.

Verification comments:

[see Page 17] [see Page 17]

CUL-4: In the event that h uman remains are unearthed
during excavation and grading activities of any future
development project, all activity shall cease immediately.

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coron er has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(a). If the remains are determined to be of Native A merican desc ent, the coroner shall within 24 hours notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then contact the most (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 20 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-4 (continued from previous page)
likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who shall then serve as the consultant on how to proceed with the remains.

Pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b), upon the discovery of Native American remains, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located is not damaged or
disturbed by further develo pment activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the mos t likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. The landowner shall discus s and confer with the descendants all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences for treatment.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 21 ends

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
HAZ-1: Re-designate the existing vacan t land proposed for low density residential located northwest of the intersection of East Garland Avenue and North Dearing Avenue and located within Fresno Yosemite International Airport Zone 1-RPZ, to Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
Planning and
Development
Department
X

HAZ-2: Limit the proposed low de nsity residential (1 to 3 dwelling units per acre) located northwest of the airport , and located within Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Zone 3-Inner Turning Area, to 2 dwelling units p er acre or less.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
Planning and
Development
Department
X

HAZ-3: Re-designate the current area within Fresno
Yosemite International Airport Zone 5-Sideline located northeast of the airport to Public Facilities -Airport or Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 22 ends

Hazards and Hazardous Materials (continued):

HAZ-4: Re-designate the current vacant lots at the northeast corner of Kearney Boulevard and South Thorne Avenue to
Public Facilities-Airport or Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
Planning and
Development
Department
X

HAZ-5: Prohibit residential uses within Safety Zone 1 northwest of the Hawes Avenue and South Thorne Avenue
intersection.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
Planning and
Development
Department
X

HAZ-6: Establish an alternative Emergency Operations
Center in the event the current Emergency Operations Center is under redevelopment or blocked.

Verification comments:

Prior to
redevelopment
of the current
Emergency
Operations
Center
Fresno Fire
Department
and Mayor/
City Manager’s
Office
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 23 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality
HYD-1: The City shall develop and implement water
conservation measures to reduce the per capita water use to 215 gallons per capita per day.

Verification comments:

Prior to water
demand
exceeding water
supply
Department of
Public Utilities
(DPU)
X

HYD-2: The City shall continue to be an active p articipant in the Kings Water Authority and the implementation of the Kings Basin IRWMP.

Verification comments:

Ongoing DPU X

HYD-5.1: The City and partnering agencies shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capac ity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan coll ection systems to less than significant.
• Implement the existing Storm Drainage Master Plan
(SDMP) for collection systems in drainage areas where the amount of imperviousness is unaffected by the cha nge in land uses.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing
stormwater
drainage
facilities
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control
District
(FMFCD),
Planning and
Development
Department,
and PW

X X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 24 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.1 (continued from previous page)
• Update the SDMP in those drainag e areas where the
amount of imperviousness in creased due to the change in land uses to determine the changes in the collection
systems that would need to occur to prov ide adequate
capacity for the stormwater runoff from the increased
imperviousness.
• Implement the updated SDMP to p rovide stormwater
collection systems that have sufficient capacity to convey the peak runoff rates from the areas of increased
imperviousness.

Require developments that increase site imperviousness to install, operate, and maintain FMFCD approved on -site detention systems to reduce the peak runoff rates resulting from the increased imperviousness to the peak runoff rates that will not exceed the capacity of the existing stormwater collection systems.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 25 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.2: The City and partnering agencies shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan retention basins to less than significant:

Consult the SDMP to analyze the impacts to existing and planned retention basins to determine remedial measures required to reduce the impact on retention basin capacity to less than significant. Remedial measures would include:
• Increase the size of the retention basin through the purchase of more land or deepening the basin or a combination for planned retention basins.
• Increase t he size of the emergency relief pump capacity required to pump excess runoff volume out of the basin and into adjacent canal that convey the stormwater to a disposal facility for existing retention basins.
• Require developments that increase runoff volume to install, operate, and maintain, Low Impact Development (LID)
measures to reduce runoff volume to the runoff volume that will not exceed the capacity of the existing retention basins.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing retention
basin facilities
FMFCD,
Planning and
Development
Department,
and PW
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 26 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.3: The City and partnering agencies shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan urban detention (stormwater quality) basins to less than significant.

Consult the SDMP to determine the impacts to the urban detention basin weir overflow rates and determine remedial measures required to reduce the impact on the detention basin capacity to less than significant. Remedial measures would include:
• Modify overfl ow weir to maintain the sus pended solids removal rates adopted by the FMFCD Board of Directors.
• Increase the size of the urban detention basin to increase residence time by purchasing more land. The existing
detention basins are already at the adopted design depth. • Require developm ents that increase r unoff volume to install, operate, and maintain, Low Impact Development
(LID) measures to reduce peak runoff rates and runoff
volume to the runoff rates and volumes that will not exceed the weir overflow rates of the existing urban deten tion basins.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing urban
detention basin
(stormwater
quality) facilities
FMFCD,
Planning and
Development
Department,
and PW
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 27 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.4: The City shall implement the follow ing measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan pump disposal systems to less than significant.
• Consult the SDMP to determine the extent and degree to which the capacity of th e existing pump system will be exceeded.
• Require new developments to install, operate, and maintain FMFCD design standard on-site detention facilities to reduce peak stormwater runoff rates to existing planned peak runoff rates.
• Provide additional pump sys tem capacity to maximum
allowed by existing perm itting to increase the capacity to match or exceed the pe ak runoff rates determined by the SDMP .

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing pump
disposal systems
FMFCD,
Planning and
Development
Department,
and PW
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 28 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.5: The City shall work with FMFC D to develop and adopt an update to the SDMP for the Southeast Development Area that would be adequately designed to collect, convey and dispose of runoff a t the rates and volumes which would be generated by the planned land uses in that area.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals in the
Southeast
Development
Area
FMFCD,
Planning and
Development
Department,
and PW
X

Public Services:

PS-1: As future fire facili ties are planned, the fire de partment shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur.

Typical impacts from fire facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce these impacts includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks on the fire department sites. • Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation and a “keep clear zone” during emergency responses.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures on the fire department sites.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future fire
department
facilities
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 29 ends

Public Services (continued):

PS-2: As future police facilities are planned, the police department shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from police facilities inclu de noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from police department facilities includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks on the police department sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on ligh ting fixtures on the police department sites.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future Police
Department
facilities
Planning and
Development
Department
X

PS-3: As future public and private school faci lities are planned, school di stricts shall evaluate i f specific
environmental effects would occur with regard to public schools, and Planning and Development Department shall evaluate other school facilities . Typical impacts from school facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from school facilities includes:
(continued on next page)
During the
planning process
for future school
facilities
Planning and
Development
Department,
local school
districts, and
the Division of
the State
Architect
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 30 ends

Public Services (continued):

PS-3 (continued from previous page)
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision o f hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures for stadium lights.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

PS-4: As future parks and recreational facilities are planned, the City shall evaluate if specific environmental effects wou ld occur. Typical impacts from school facilities include noise, traffic, and lig hting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from park and recreational facilities includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures for outdoor play area/field lights.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future park
and recreation
facilities
Planning and
Development
Department
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 31 ends

Public Services (continued):

PS-5: As future detention, court, library, and hospital facilities are planned, the appropriate agencies shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from court, library, and ho spital facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on outdoor lighting fixtures.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future
detention, court,
library, and
hospital facilities
Planning and
Development
Department, to
the extent that
agencies
constructing
these facilities
are subject to
City of Fresno
regulation
X

Utilities and Service Systems
USS-1: The City shall develop and implement a wastewater master plan update.

Verification comments:

Prior to
wastewater
conveyance and
treatment
demand
exceeding
capacity

DPU X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 32 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-2: Prior to exceeding existing wastewater treatment capacity, the City shall evaluate the was tewater system and shall not approve additional developme nt that contributes wastewater to the wastewater treatme nt facility that could exceed capacity until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct the following improvements:
• Construct an approximately 70 MGD ex pansion of the
Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclama tion Facility and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the
generation of wastewater is increased.
• Construct an approximately 0.49 MGD expa nsion of the North Facility a nd obtain revised waste disc harge permits as the generation of wastewater is increased.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
existing
wastewater
treatment
capacity

DPU X

USS-3: Prior to exceeding existing wa stewater treatment capacity, the City shall evaluate the w astewater system and shall not approve additional devel opment that contributes wastewater to the wastewater treatment facility that could exceed capacity until additional capacity is provided. After (continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
existing
wastewater
treatment
capacity

DPU X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 33 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-3 (continued from previous page)
approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct the following improvements:
• Construct an approximately 24 MGD wastewater trea tment facility within the Southeast Development Area a nd obtain revised waste discharge requirements as the generation of wastewater is increased.
• Construct an approximately 9.6 MGD expansion of th e
Regional Wastewater Treatme nt and Reclamation Facility and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the
generation of wastewater is increased.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]

USS-4: A Traffic Control/Traffic Manageme nt Plan to address traffic impacts during construction of water and sewer facilities shall be prepared and implem ented, subject to approval by the City (and Fresno County , when work is being done in unincorporated area roadways) . The plan shall identify access and parking restriction s, pavement markings and signage, and hours of construction and for deliveries . It shall include haul routes, the notification plan, and coordination with emergency service providers and schools.

Verification comments:

Prior to
construction of
water and sewer
facilities
PW for work in
the City; PW
and Fresno
County Public
Works and
Planning when
unincorporated
area roadways
are involved
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 34 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-5: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing wastewater collection system facilities , the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection s ystem and shall not approve additional development that would generate additional
wastewater and exceed the capacity of a facility until
additional capacity is provided. B y approximately the year 2025, the following capacity improvements shall be provided. • Orange Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Dakota and Jensen Avenues. Approximately
37,240 feet of new sewer main s hall be installed and
approximately 5,760 feet of existing s ewer main shall be rehabilitated. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 27 inches to 42 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are RS03A, RL02, C01 -REP , C02-REP , C03-REP , C04-REP ,
C05-REP , C06-REL and C07-REP .
• Marks Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Clinton Avenue and Kearney Boulevard.

Approximately 12,150 feet of new sewer main shall be
installed. The size o f the new sewer main shall ra nge from 33 inches to 60 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are
CM1-REP and CM2-REP.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
wastewater
collection system
facilities

DPU X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 35 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-5 (continued from previous page)
• North Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Polk and Fruit Avenues and also between Orange
and Maple Avenues. Approximately 25,700 feet o f new
sewer main shall be instal led. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 48 inches to 66 inches in diameter.

The associated project designations in the 2006
Wastewater Master Plan are CN1-REL1 and CN3-REL1.
• Ashlan Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Hu ghes and West Avenues and also between
Fruit and Blackstone Avenues. Approximately 9,260 feet of new sewer main shall be installed. The size of the new
sewer main shall range from 24 inches to 3 6 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are CA1-REL and CA2-REP.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 36 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-6: Prior to exce eding capacity within the exi sting 28 pipeline segments shown in Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix J -1, the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection system and shall not approve additional development that would generate additional wastewater and exceed the capacity of one of the 28 pipeline segments until additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing 28
pipeline seg-
ments shown in
Figures 1 and 2
in Appendix J-1
of the MEIR

DPU X

USS-7: Prior to exceeding existing water supply capacity, the City s hall evaluate the water supply system and shall not approve additional development that demand additional water until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the follow ing capacity improvements sha ll be provided.
• Construct an appr oximately 80 million gallon per day (MGD) surface water treatment facility near the intersection of Armstrong and Olive Avenues, in accordance with
Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the City of Fresno Metropolitan Water Resources Management Plan Update (2014 Met ro
Plan Update) Phase 2 Report, dated January 2012.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
existing water
supply capacity

DPU X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 37 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-7 (continued from previous page)
• Construct an approximately 30 MGD expansion of the
existing northeast surface water treatment facility for a total capacity of 60 MGD, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct an approximately 20 MGD surface water
treatment facility in the so uthwest portion of the City, in accordance with Ch apter 9 and Figure 9 -1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

USS-8: Prior to excee ding capacity within the exis ting water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance syste m and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capaci ty is provided.

The followin g capacity improvements shall be p rovided by approximately 2025.
• Construct 65 new gr oundwater wells, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update. (continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
water
conveyance
facilities

DPU X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 38 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-8 (continued from previous page)
• Construct a 2.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T2) near the intersection of Clovis and
California Avenues, in accord ance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 3.0 mi llion gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T3) near the intersection of Temperance and
Dakota Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Fi gure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 3.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T4) in the Downtown Planning Area, in
accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9 -1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable w ater reservoir (Reservoir T5) near the intersection of Ashlan an d
Chestnut Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T6) near the intersection of As hlan Avenue and Highway 99, i n accordance with Chapter 9 and Fig ure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 39 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-8 (continued from previous two pages)
• Construct 50.3 miles of reg ional water transmission
mains ranging in size from 24-inch to 48-inch diameter, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9 -1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.
• Construct 95.9 miles of 16 -inch diameter transmission grid mains, in ac cordance with Chapter 9 and F igure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.

Verification comments:

[see Page 37] [see Page 37]

USS-9: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance s ystem and shall not approve a dditional
development that would de mand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided after approximately the year 2025 and additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior t o exceedance of capacity within the water conveya nce facilities to accommodate full buildout of the General Plan Update.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
water
conveyance
facilities

DPU X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 40 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-9 (continued from previous page)
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (SEDA Reservoir 1) within the northern part of the
Southeast Development Area.
• Construct a 4.0 mil lion gallon potable water reservoir (SEDA Reservoir 2) within the southern part of t he
Southeast Development Area.

Additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior to exceedance of capacity within the water convey ance
facilities to accommodat e full buildout of the General Plan Update.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

Utilities and Service Systems - Hydrology and Water Quality USS-10: In order to maintain Fresno Irrigation District canal operability, FMFCD sha ll m aintain operational intermittent flows during the dry season , within defined cha nnel capacity and downstream capture capabilities, for recharge.

Verification comments:

During the dry
season
Fresno
Irrigation
District (FID)
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 41 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources:

USS-11: When FMFCD proposes to provide dr ainage service outside of urbanized areas:
(a) FMFCD shall conduct preliminary investigations on
undeveloped lands outside of highly urbanized areas.

These investigations s hall examine wetland hydrology,
vegetation and soil types. These preliminary
investigations shall be the basis for making a
determination on whether or not more in -depth wetland
studies shall be necessary. If the proposed proj ect site does not exhibit wet land hydrology, support a
prevalence of wetland vegetation and wetland soil types then no further action is required.
(b) Where proposed activities could have an impact on
areas verified by the Corps as jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. (urban and rural streams, seasonal
wetlands, and vernal pools), FMFCD shall obtain the
necessary Clean Water Act, Section 404 permits for
activities where fill material shall be placed in a wetland, obstruct the flow or circulation of waters of the United States, impair or reduce the reach of such w aters. A s part of FMFCD’s Memorandum of Unders tanding with
CDFG, Section 404 and 401 permits would be obtained
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and from the
(continued on next page)
Prior to
development
approvals
outside of highly
urbanized areas
California
Regional
Water Quality
Control Board
(RWQCB), and
USACE
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 42 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-11 (continued from previous page)
Regional Water Quality Control Board for any activity
involving filling of jurisdictional waters). At a minimum, to mee t “no net loss policy,” the permits shall require replacement of wetland habitat at a 1:1 ratio.
(c) Where proposed activities could have an im pact on
areas verified by the Corps as jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. (urban and rural streams, se asonal
wetlands, and vernal pools), FMFCD shall submit and
implement a wetland mitigation plan based on the
wetland acreage verified by the U.S . Army Corps of
Engineers. T he wetland mitigation plan shall be
prepared by a qualified biologist or wetland sci entist experienced in wetland creation, and shall include the
following or equally effective elements:
i. Specific location, size, and existing hy drology and soils within the wetland creation area.
ii. Wetland mitigat ion techniques, seed source,
planting specific ations, and required buffer
setbacks. In addition, the mitigation plan shall
ensure adequate water supply is provided to the
created wetlands in order to maintain the proper
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 43 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-11 (continued from previous two pages)
hydrologic regimes required by the different types
of wetlands created. Provisions to ensure the
wetland water supply is maintained in perpetuity
shall be included in the plan.
iii. A monitoring program for restored, enhanced,
created, and preserved wetlands on the project
site. A monitoring program is required to meet three
objectives; 1) establish a wetland creation s uccess
criteria to be met ; 2) to specify monit oring
methodology; 3) to identify as far as is possible,
specific remedial actions that will be required in
order to achieve the success criter ia; and 4) to
document the de gree of success achieved in
establishing wetland vegetation.
(d) A monitoring plan s hall be developed and implemented by a qualified biologist to monitor results of any on -site wetland restoration and creation for five years. T he
monitoring plan shall incl ude specific success criteria, frequency and timing of monitoring, and assessment of
whether or not maintenance activities are being carried out and how these shall be adjusted if necessary.
(continued on next page)
[see Page 41] [see Page 41]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 44 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-11 (continued from previous three pages)
If monitoring reveals that success criteria are not being met, remedial habitat creation or restoration should be designed and implemented by a qualifi ed biologist and
subject to five years of monitoring as described above.

Or
(e) In lieu of developing a mitigation plan that outlines the avoidance, purchase, or creation of wetlands, FMFCD
could purchase mitigation credits th rough a Corps
approved Mitigation Bank.

Verification comments:

[see Page 41] [see Page 41]

USS-12: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage service outside in areas that support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools:
(a) During facility design and prior to in itiation of ground disturbing activities in areas that support seas onal
wetlands or vernal pools, FMFCD shall con duct a
preliminary rare plant assessment. The assessment will determine the likelihood on whether or not the project
site could support rare plants. If it is determined that the project site would not support rare plants, then no further (continued on next page)
During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
ground
disturbing
activities in
areas that
support seasonal
wetlands or
vernal pools
California
Department of
Fish & Wildlife
(CDFW) and
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
(USFWS)
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 45 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-12 (continued from previous page)
action is required. However, if the project s ite has the potential to support rare plants; then a rare plant surv ey shall be conducted. Rare plant surveys sh all be
conducted by qualified biologists in accordance with the most current CDFG/USFWS guidelines or protocols and
shall be conducted at the time of year when the plants in question are identifiable.
(b) Based on the results of the survey, prior to design approval, FMFCD shall coordinate with CDFG and/or
implement a Section 7 consultation with USFWS, shall
determine whether the project facility would result in a significant impact to any special status plant spe cies.

Evaluation of project impacts shall con sider the
following:
• The status of the species in question ( e.g., officially listed by the State or Federal Endangered Species
Acts).
• The relat ive density and distribution of the on -site occurrence versus typica l occurrences of the
species in question.
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 46 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-12 (continued from previous two pages)
• The habitat quality of the on -site occurrence relative to historic, current or p otential distribution of the
population.
(c) Prior to design approval, and in consultation with the CDFG and/or the USFWS, FMFCD shall prepare and
implement a mitigation pl an, in accordance with any
applicable S tate and/or federal statutes or laws, that reduces impacts to a less than significant level.

Verification comments:

[see Page 44] [see Page 44]

USS-13: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage service outside in a reas that support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools:
(a) During facility design and prio r to initiation of ground disturbing activities in areas that support seasonal
wetlands or vernal pools, FMFCD shall conduct a
preliminary surv ey to determine the presence of listed vernal pool crustaceans.
(continued on next page)
During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
ground
disturbing
activities in
areas that
support seasonal
wetlands or
vernal pools
CDFW and
USFWS
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 47 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-13 (continued from previous page)
(b) If potenti al habitat (vernal pools, seasonally inundated areas) or fairy shrimp exist within areas proposed to be disturbed, FMFCD shall complete the fir st and second
phase of fairy shrimp presence or absence surveys. If an absence finding is determined and accepted by the
USFWS, then no further mitigation shall be required for fairy shrimp.
(c) If fairy shrimp are found to be present within vernal pools or other areas of inundation t o be impacted by the
implementation of storm drainage facilities, FMFCD shall mitigate impacts on fairy shrimp habitat in accordance
with the USFWS requirements of the Programmatic
Biological Opinion. This shall include on -site or off -site creation and/or preservation of fairy shrimp habitat at ratios ranging from 3:1 to 5:1 depending on the habitat impacted and the choice of on -site or off -site mitigation.

Or mitigation shall be the purchase of mitigation credit through an accredited mitigation bank.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 48 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-14: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in an area where elderberry bushes may occur:
(a) During facil ity design and prior to initiation of
construction activities, FMFCD shall conduct a project- specific survey for all potential Valley Elderberry
Longhorn Beetle (VELB) habitats (elderberry shrubs),
including a stem count and an assessment of historic or current VELB habitat.
(b) FMFCD shall av oid and protect all potential identified VELB habitat where feasible.
(c) Where avoidance is infeasible, develop and implement a VELB mitigation plan in accordance with the most
current USFWS mitigation guidelines f or unavoidable
take of VELB habitat purs uant to either Section 7 or
Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act.

The mitigation plan shall include, but might not be limited to, relocation of elderberry shrubs, planting of elderberry shrubs, and mon itoring of relocated and planted
elderberry shrubs.

Verification comments:

During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
construction
activities
CDFW and
USFWS
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 49 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-15: Prior to ground disturbing activities du ring nesting season (March through July) fo r a project that supports bird nesting habitat, FMFCD shall conduct a survey of trees. If nests are found during the survey, a qualified biolog ist shall assess the nesting activity on the project site. If active nests are located, no construction activiti es shall be allowed within 250 feet of the nest until the young have fledged. If
construction activities are planned during the no n -breeding period (August through Februa ry), a nest survey is not necessary.

Verification comments:

Prior to ground
disturbing
activities during
nesting season
(March through
July) for a
project that
supports bird
nesting habitat
CDFW and
USFWS
X

USS-16: When FMFCD proposes to cons truct drainage
facilities in an area that supports bird nesting habitat:
(a) FMFCD s hall conduct a pre -construction breeding - season survey (approximately February 1 through August
31) of proposed project sites in suitable habit at (levee and canal berms, op en grasslands with suitable burrows) during the same calendar year that construction is
planned to begin. If phased construction procedures are planned for the proposed project, the results of the above survey shall be valid o nly for the season when it is
conducted.
(continued on next page)
Prior to ground
disturbing
activities during
nesting season
(March through
July) for a
project that
supports bird
nesting habitat
CDFW and
USFWS
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 50 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-16 (continued from previous page)
(b) During the construction stage, FMFCD shall avoid all burrowing owl nest sites potentially disturbed by project construction during the breeding season while the nest is occupied w ith adults and/or young. The occupied nest site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to
determine when th e nest is no longer used. Avoidance
shall include the establishment of a 160 -foot diameter non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site.

Disturbance of any nest sites s hall only occur outside of the breeding season and when the nests are unoccupied
based on monitoring by a qualified biologist. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary
construction fencing.

Based on appro val by CDFG, pre -construction and pre - breeding season exclusion measures may be implemented to preclude burrowing owl occupation of the project site prior to project-related disturbance. Burrowing owls can be passively excluded from potential nest sites in the construction area, either by closing the burrows or placing one -way doors in the burrows according to current CDFG protocol. Burrows shall be examined not more than 30 days before construction to
ensure that no owls have recolonized the area of construction. (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 51 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-16 (continued from previous two pages)
For each burrow destroyed, a new burrow shall be created (by installing artificial burrows at a rati o of 2:1 on protected lands nearby.

Verification comments:

[see Page 49] [see Page 49]

USS-17: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in the San Joaquin River corridor:
(a) FMFCD shall not conduct instream a ctivities in the San Joaquin River between October 15 and April 15. If t his is not feasible, FMFCD shall consult with the National
Marine Fisheries Service and CDFW on the appropriate
measures to be implemented in order to protect listed
salmonids in the San Joaquin River.
(b) Riparian vegetation shading the main channel tha t is removed or damaged shall be replaced at a ratio and
quantity sufficient to maintain the existing shading of the channel. The location of replacement trees on or within (continued on next page)
During instream
activities
conducted
between
October 15 and
April 15
National
Marine
Fisheries
Service
(NMFS),
CDFW, and
Central Valley
Flood
Protection
Board
(CVFPB)
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 52 ends

Utilities and Service Systems / Biological Resources (continued):

USS-17 (continued from previous page)
FMFCD berms, detention p onds or river channels shall
be approved by FMFCD and the Central Valley Flood
Protection Board.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]

Utilities and Service Systems – Recreation / Trails:

USS-18: When FMFCD updates its District Service Plan:

Prior to final design ap proval of all elements of the District Services Plan, FMFCD shall consult with Fresno County, City of Fresno, and City of Clovis to determine i f any element would temporarily disrupt or permanently displace adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities as a result of the proposed District Services Plan. If the proposed project would not temporarily disrupt or permanently displace adopted existing or planned trails, no further mitigation is necessary. If the proposed project woul d have an effect on the trails and associated facilities, FMFCD shall implement the following:
(continued on next page)
Prior to final
design approval
of all elements of
the District
Services Plan
Planning and
Development
Department,
PW, City of
Clovis, and
County of
Fresno
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 53 ends

Utilities and Service Systems – Recreation / Trails (continued):

USS-18 (continued from previous page)
(a) If short-term disruption of adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities oc cur, FMFCD shall consult and coordinate with Fresno County, City of Fresno, and City of Clovis to temporarily re -route the trails and associated facilities.
(b) If permanent displac ement of the adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreationa l facilities occur, the appropriate design modifications to prevent permanent displacement shall be implemented in the final project
design or FMFCD shall replace these facilities.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

Utilities and Service Systems – Air Quality:

USS-19: When District drainage facilities are constructed, FMFCD shall:
(a) Minimize idling time of construction equipment vehicles to no more than ten minutes, or require that engines be shut off when not in use.
(continued on next page)
During storm
water drainage
facility
construction
activities
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control
District and

SJVAPCD
X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 54 ends

Utilities and Service Systems – Air Quality (continued):

USS-19 (continued from previous page)
(b) Construction shall be curtailed as much as possible when the Air Quality Index (AQI) is above 150. AQI forecasts can be found on the SJVAPCD web site.
(c) Off-road trucks should be equipped with on-road engines if possible.
(d) Construction equipment should have engines that meet the current off-road engine emission standard (as certified by CARB), or be re -powered with an engine that meets this standard.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Storm Water Drainage Facilities:

USS-20: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing storm water drainage facilities, the City shall coordinate with FMFCD to evaluate the storm water drainage system a nd shall not approve additional development th at would convey additional storm water to a facility that would experience an exceedance of capacity until the necessary additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing storm
water drainage
facilities

FMFCD, PW,
and Planning
and
Development
Department
X X

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P19-04891 June 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 55 ends

Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Water Supply Capacity:

USS-21: Prior to exceeding existing water supply capacity, the City shall eva luate the water supply system a nd shall not approve additional development that demand additional water until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct an approximately 25,000 AF/year tertiary recycled water expansion to the Fresno - Clovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility in
accordance with the 2013 Recycled Water Master Plan and the 2014 City of Fresno Metropolitan Water Resources
Management Plan update.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure USS -5 is also required prior to approximately the year 2025.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
existing water
supply capacity
DPU and
Planning and
Development
Department
X X

Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Landfill Capacity:

USS-22: Prior to exceeding landfill cap acity, the City shal l evaluate a dditional landfill locations and shall not appr ove additional development that could contribute solid waste to a landfill that is at capacity until additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
landfill capacity
DPU and
Planning and
Development
Department
X

Fresno City CouncilJune 9, 2022

Fresno City Council
June 9, 2022