Fresno City Council
June 30, 2022

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Biological Resources (continued):

MM BIO-9 (continued from previous page):
incorporating detention basins shall assist in ensuring project - related impacts to wetland habitat are minimized to the greatest extent feasible.

Verification comments:
[see previous
pag
e]
[see previous
page]
Section 5.5 - Cultural Resources:

MM CUL-1: If previously unknown resources are encountered before or during grading activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified historical resources specialist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified historical resources specialist shall make recommendations to the C ity on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and the City’s
Historic Preservation Ordinance.

If the resources are determined to be unique historical resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines, measures shall be identified by the monitor and (continued on next page)

Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities
DARM
A - Incorporated i
nto Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Cultural Resources (continued):

MM CUL-1 (continued from previous page)
recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these Any historical artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation s hall be provided to a City -approved institution or person who is capable of providing long -germ preservation to allow future scientific study.

Verification comments:
[see previous
pag
e]
[see previous
page]

MM CUL-2: Subsequent to a preliminary City review of the project grading plans, if there is evidence that a project will include excavation or construction activities within previously undisturbed soils, a field survey and literature search for prehistoric archaeological resources shall be conducted. The following procedures shall be followed.

If prehistoric resources are not found during either the field survey or literature search, excavation and/or construction activities can commence. In the event that buried prehistoric (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities

DARM
A - Incorporat
ed into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Cultural Resources (continued):

MM CUL-2 (continued from previous page)
archaeological resources are discovered during excavation and/or construction activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified archaeologist shall make
recommendations to the City on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.

If the resources are determined to be unique prehistoric archaeological resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency.

Appropriate measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any prehistoric archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided to a City-approved institution or person who is capable of (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

A - Incorpor
ated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Cultural Resources (continued):

MM CUL-2 (further continued from previous two pages)
providing long -term preservation to allow future scientific study.

If prehistoric resources are found during the field survey or literature review, the resources shall be inventoried using appropriate State record forms and submit the forms to the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. The
resources shall be evaluated for significance. If the resources are found to be significant, measures shall be identified by the qualified archaeologist. Similar to above, appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

In addition, appropriate mitigation for excavation and
construction activities in the vicinity of the resources found during the field survey or literature review shall include an archaeological monitor. The monitoring period shall be determined by the qualified archaeologist. If additional prehistoric archaeological reso
urces are found during
excavation and/or construction activities, the procedure (continued on next page)
[see Page 14] [see Page 14]
Cultural
Resources (continued):

A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
MM CUL-2 (further continued from previous three pages)
identified above for the discover y of unknown resources shall be followed. .

Verification comments:
[see Page 14] [see Page 14]
MM CUL-3: Subsequent to a preliminary City review of the project grading plans, if there is evidence that a project will include excavation or construction activities within previously undisturbed soils, a field survey and literature search for unique paleontological/geological resources shall be
conducted. The following procedures shall be followed:

If unique paleontological/geological resources are not found during either the field survey or literature search, excavation and/or construction activities can commence. In the event that unique paleontological/geological resources are
discovered during excavation and/or construction activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified paleontologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified paleontologist shall make recommendations to the City on the (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities

DARM
A - Incorporated i
nto Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Cultural Resources (continued):

MM CUL-3 (continued from previous page)
measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to, excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds. If the resources are determined to be significant, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect
these resources. Any paleontological/geological
resources recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided to a City -approved institution or person who is capable of providing long -term preservation to allow future scientific study.

If unique paleont ological/geological resources are found during the field survey or literature review, the resources shall be inventoried and evaluated for significance. If the resources are found to be significant, mitigation measures shall be identified by the qualified paleontologist. Similar to above, appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
A - Incorpor
ated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Cultural Resources (continued):

MM CUL-3 (further continued from previous two pages)
excavations of the finds. In addition, appropriate mitigation for excavation and construction activities in the vicinity of the resources found dur ing the field survey or literature review shall include a paleontological monitor. The monitoring period shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist. If additional paleontological/geological resources are found during excavation and/or construction activities, the procedure identified above for the discovery of unknown resources shall be followed.

Verification comments:
[see Page 16] [s
ee Page 16]
MM CUL-4: In the event that human remains are unearthed during excavation and grading activities of any future
development project, all activity shall cease immediately.

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(a). If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner shall within 24 hours notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then contact the most (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities

DARM
A - Inc
orporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. ___

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project
B - Mitigated
C - Mitigation in Process
D - Responsible Agency Contacted
E - Part of City-Wide Program
F - Not Applicable

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-4 (continued from previous page)
likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who shall then serve as the consultant on how to proceed with the remains.

Pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b), upon the discovery of Native American remains, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located is not damaged or
disturbed by further development activity until the landowner

has discussed and conferred with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. The landowner shall discuss and confer with the descendants all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences for treatment.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Section 5.8 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials
MM HAZ-1: Re-designate the existing vacant land proposed for low density residential use, located northwest of the intersection of East Garland Avenue and North Dearing
Avenue and within Fresno Yosemite International Airport Zone 1-RPZ, to Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
dev
elopment
approvals
DARM
MM HAZ-2: Limit the proposed low density residential at (1 to 3 dwelling units per acre) located northwest of the airport , and located within Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Zone 3-Inner Turning Area, to 2 dwelling units per acre or less.

Verification comments:

Prior to
dev
elopment
approvals
DARM
MM HAZ-3: Re -designate the current area located within Fresno Yosemite International Airport Zone 5- Sideline northeast of the airport to Public Facilities -Airport or Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
dev
elopment
approvals
DARM
A - Inc
orporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Hazards and Hazardous Materials (continued):

MM HAZ-4: Re-designate the current vacant lots located at the northeast corner of Kearney Boulevard and South Thorne Avenue to Public Facilities-Airport or Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior t
o
development
approvals
DARM
MM HAZ-5: Prohibit residential uses within Safety Zone 1 northwest of the Hawes Avenue and South Thorne Avenue
intersection.

Verification comments:

Prior t o
development
approvals
DARM
MM HAZ-6: Establish an alternative Emergency Operations Center in the event the current Emergency Operations Center is under redevelopment or blocked.

Verification comments:

Prior t o
redevelopment
of the current
Emergency
Operations
Center
Fresno Fire
Department
and Mayor/
City Manager’s
Office
A - Inc
orporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Section 5.9 - Hydrology and Water Quality:

MM HYD-1: The City shall develop and implement water
conservation measures to reduce the per capita water use to 215 gallons per capita per day.

Verification comments:

Prior to w
ater
demand
exceeding water
supply
Department of
Public Utilities
(DPU)
MM HYD-2: The City shall continue to be an active participant in the Kings Water Authority and the implementation of the Kings Basin IRWMP.

Verification comments:

Ongoing DPU
MM HYD-5.1: The City and partnering agencies shall
implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan collection systems to less than significant.
• Implement the existing Storm Drainage Master Plan
(SDMP) for collection systems in drainage areas where the amount of imperviousness is unaffected by the change in land uses.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing
stormwater
drainage
facilities
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control
District
(FMFCD),
DARM, and
PW
A - Incorpor
ated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO.

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project
B - Mitigated
C - Mitigation in Process
D - Responsible Agency Contacted
E - Part of City-Wide Program
F - Not Applicable

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.1 (continued from previous page)
• Update the SDMP in those drainage areas where the
amount of imperviousness increased due to the change in land uses to determine the changes in the collection
systems that would need to occur to provide adequate
capacity for the stormwater runoff from the increased
imperviousness.
• Implement the updated SDMP to provide stormwater
collection systems that have sufficient capacity to convey the peak runoff rates from the areas of increased
imperviousness.

Require developments that increase site imperviousness to install, operate, and maintain FMFCD approved on-site
detention systems to reduce the peak runoff rates resulting from the increased imperviousness to the peak runoff rates that will not exceed the capacity of the existing stormwater collection systems.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

MM HYD-5.2: The City and partnering agencies shall
implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan retention basins to less than significant:

Consult the SDMP to analyze the impacts to existing and planned retention basins to determine remedial measures required to reduce the impact on retention basin capacity to less than significant. Remedial measures would include:
• Increase the size of the retention basin through the purchase of more land or deepening the basin or a combination for planned retention basins.
• Increase the size of the emergency relief pump capacity required to pump excess runoff volume out of the basin and into adjacent canal that convey the stormwater to a disposal facility for existing retention basins.
• Require developments that increase runoff volume to install, operate, and maintain, Low Impact Development (LID)
measures to reduce runoff volume to the runoff volume that will not exceed the capacity of the existing retention basins.

Verification comments:

Prior to

exceedance of
capacity of
existing retention
basin facilities
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

MM HYD-5.3: The City and partnering agencies shall
implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan urban detention (stormwater quality) basins to less than significant.

Consult the SDMP to determine the impacts to the urban
detention basin weir overflow rates and determine remedial measures required to reduce the impact on the detention basin capacity to less than significant. Remedial measures would include:
• Modify overflow weir to maintain the suspended solids removal rates adopted by the FMFCD Board of Directors.
• Increase the size of the urban detention basin to increase residence time by purchasing more land. The existing
detention basins are already at the adopted design depth. • Require developments that increase runoff volume to
install, operate, and maintain, Low Impact Development
(LID) measures to reduce peak runoff rates and runoff
volume to the runoff rates and volumes that will not exceed the weir overflow rates of the existing urban detention basins.

Verification comments:

Prior to

exceedancesof
capacity of
existing urban
detention basin
(stormwater
quality) facilities
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

MM HYD-5.4: The City shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan pump disposal systems to less than significant.
• Consult the SDMP to determine the extent and degree to which the capacity of the existing pump system will be
exceeded.
• Require new developments to install, operate, and maintain FMFCD design standard on-site detention facilities to reduce peak stormwater runoff rates to existing planned peak runoff rates.
• Provide additional pump system capacity to maximum
allowed by existing permitting to increase the capacity to match or exceed the peak runoff rates determined by the SDMP update.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing pump
disposal systems
FMFCD,
DARM,
and
PW
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

MM HYD-5.5: The City shall work with FMFC D to develop and adopt an update to the SDMP for the Southeast
Development Area that is would be adequately designed to collect, convey and dispose of runoff at the rates and volumes which would be generated by the planned land uses in th at area.

Verification comments:

Prior to
devel
opment
approvals in the
Southeast
Development
Area
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
Section 5.13 - Public Services:

MM PS-1: As future fire facilities are planned, the fire department shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from fire facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce these impacts includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks on the fire department sites. • Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation and a “keep clear zone” during emergency responses.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures on the fire department sites.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future fire
department
facilities
DARM
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Public Services (continued):

MM PS-2: As future police facilities are planned, the Police Department shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from police facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from police department facilities includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks on the police department sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures on the Police Department sites.

Verification comments:

During the
pl
anning process
for future Police
Department
facilities
DARM
MM PS-3: As future public and private school facilities are planned, school districts shall evaluate if specific
environmental effects would occur w ith regard to public schools, and DARM shall evaluate other school facilities .

Typical impacts from school facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from school facilities includes:
(continued on next page)
During the
planning process
for future school
facilities
DARM, local
school districts,
and the
Division of the
State Architect
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Public Services (continued):

MM PS-3 (continued from previous page)
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures for stadium lights.

Verification comments:
[see previ
ous
page]
[see previous
page]
MM PS-4: As future parks and recreational faci lities are planned, the City shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from parks and
recreational facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting.

Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from these facilities includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures for outdoor play area/field lights.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future park
and recreation
facilities
DARM
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Public Services (continued):

MM PS-5: As future court, library, detention, and hospital facilities are planned, the appropriate agencies and DARM, when the City has jurisdiction, shall evaluat e if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from court, library, detention, and hospital facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce these potential impacts includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on outdoor lighting fixtures
Verification comments:

During the
pl
anning process
for future
detention, court,
library, and
hospital facilities
DARM, to the
extent that
agencies
approving/
constructing
these facilities
are subject to
City of Fresno
regulation
Section 5.15 - Utilities and Service Systems
MM USS-1: The City shall develop and implement a
wastewater master plan update.

Verification comments:

Prior to
w
astewater
conveyance and
treatment
demand
exceeding
capacity
DPU
A - Incorpor
ated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

MM USS-2: Prior to exceeding existing wastewater treatment capacity, the City shall evaluate the wastewater system and shall not approve additional development that contributes wastewater to the wastewater treatment facility that could exceed capacity until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct the following improvements:
• Construct an approximately 70 MGD expansion of the
Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility
and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the
generation of wastewater is increased.
• Construct an approximately 0.49 MGD expansion of the
North Facility and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the generation of wastewater is increased.

Verif
ication comments:

Prior to
exceeding
existing
wastewater
treatment
capacity
DPU
MM USS-3: Prior to exceeding existing wastewater treatment capacity, the City shall evaluate the wastewater system and shall not approve additional development that contributes wastewater to the wastewater treatment facility that could exceed capacity until additional capacity is provided.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
existing
wastewater
treatment
capacity
DPU
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

MM USS-3 (continued from previous page):

After approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct the following improvements:
• Construct an approximately 24 MGD wastewater treatment facility within the Southeast Development Area and obtain revised waste discharge requirements as the generation of wastewater is increased.
• Construct an approximately 9.6 MGD expansion of the
Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility
and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the
generation of wastewater is increased.

Verification comments:
[see previ
ous
page]
[see previ
ous
page]
MM USS-4: Prior to construction, a Traffic Control/Traffic Management Plan to address traffic impacts during
construction of water and sewer facilities shall be prepared and implemented, subject to approval by the City ( and Fresno County, when work is being done in unin corporated area roadways). The plan shall identify hours of construction and for deliveries , haul routes, access and parking restrictions, pavement markings and signage; and it shall include the (continued on next page)
Prior to
construction of
water and sewer
facilities
PW for work in
the City; PW
and Fresno
County Public
Works when
unincorporated
area roadways
are involved
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

MM USS-4 (continued from previous page):
notification plan, and coordination with emergency service providers and schools.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MM USS-5: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing wastewater collection system facilities, the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection system and shall not approve
additional development that would generate additional
wastewater and exceed the capacity of a facility until
additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the following capacity improvements shall be provided. • Orange Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be
improved between Dakota and Jensen Avenues.

Approximately 37,240 feet of new sewer main shall be
installed and approximately 5,760 feet of existing sewer main shall be rehabilitated. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 27 inches to 42 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater
Master Plan are RS03A, RL02, C01-REP, C02-REP, C03-
REP, C04-REP, C05-REP, C06-REL and C07-REP.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
wastewater
collection system
facilities
DPU
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO.

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project
B - Mitigated
C - Mitigation in Process
D - Responsible Agency Contacted
E - Part of City-Wide Program
F - Not Applicable

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-5: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing
wastewater collection system facilities, the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection system and shall not approve
additional development that would generate additional
wastewater and exceed the capacity of a facility until

additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the following capacity improvements shall be provided. • Orange Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Dakota and Jensen Avenues. Approximately
37,240 feet of new sewer main shall be installed and
approximately 5,760 feet of existing sewer main shall be rehabilitated. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 27 inches to 42 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are RS03A, RL02, C01-REP , C02-REP , C03-REP , C04-REP ,
C05-REP , C06-REL and C07-REP .
• Marks Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Clinton Avenue and Kearney Boulevard.

Approximately 12,150 feet of new sewer main shall be
installed. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 33 inches to 60 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are
CM1-REP and CM2-REP.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
wastewater
collection system
facilities
DPU
X
December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

MM USS-5 (further continued from previous two pages):
to 36 inches in diameter. The associated project
designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are
CA1-REL and CA2-REP.

Verification comments:
[see Page 34] [
see Page 34]
MM USS-6: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing 28 pipeline segments shown in Figures 1 and 2 in MEIR
Appendix J-1, the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection system and shall not approve additional development that would generate additional wastewater and exceed the
capacity of one of the 28 pipeline segments until additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior t
o
exceeding
capacity within
the existing 28
pipeline seg-
ments shown in
Figures 1 and 2
in Appendix J-1
of the MEIR
DPU
MM USS-7: Prior to exceeding existing water supply capacity, the City shall evaluate the water supply system and shall not approve additional development that would demand additional water until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the following capacity improvements shall be provided.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
existing water
supply capacity
DPU
A - Inc
orporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO.______

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project
B - Mitigated
C - Mitigation in Process
D - Responsible Agency Contacted
E - Part of City-Wide Program
F - Not Applicable

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-7 (continued from previous page)
• Construct an approximately 30 MGD expansion of the
existing northeast surface water treatment facility for a total capacity of 60 MGD, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct an approximately 20 MGD surface water
treatment facility in the southwest portion of the City, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.

Verification comments:

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
USS-8: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance system and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided by approximately 2025.
• Construct 65 new groundwater wells, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update. (continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within

the existing
water
conveyance
facilities
DPU
X
December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

MM USS-8: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance system and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capa city of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided by approximately 2025.
• Construct 65 new groundwater wells, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update. • Construct a 2.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T2) near the intersection of Clovis and
California Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 3.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T3) near the intersection of Temperance and
Dakota Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
water
conveyance
facilities
DPU
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _______

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project
B - Mitigated
C - Mitigation in Process
D - Responsible Agency Contacted
E - Part of City-Wide Program
F - Not Applicable

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-8 (continued from previous two pages)
• Construct 50.3 miles of regional water transmission
mains ranging in size from 24-inch to 48-inch diameter, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.
• Construct 95.9 miles of 16-inch diameter transmission grid mains, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9- 1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.

Verification comments:
[see Page 37] [see Page 37]
USS-9: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance system and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided after approximately the year 2025 and additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior to exceedance of capacity within the water conveyance facilities to accommodate full buildout of the General Plan Update.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within

the existing
water
conveyance
facilities
DPU
X
December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

MM USS-9: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance system and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided after approximately the year 2025 and additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior to exceedance of capacity within the water conveyance facilities to accommodate full buildout of the General Plan Update.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (SEDA Reservoir 1) within the northern part of the
Southeast Development Area.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (SEDA Reservoir 2) within the southern part of the
Southeast Development Area.

Additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior to exceedance of capacity within the water conveyance
facilities to accommodate full buildout of the General Plan Update.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
water
conveyance
facilities
DPU
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Hydrology and Water Quality USS-10: In order to maintain Fresno Irrigation District canal operability, FMFCD shall m aintain operational intermittent flows during the dry season, within defined channel capacity and downstream capture capabilities, for recharge.

Verification comments:

During t
he dry
season
Fresno
Irrigation
District (FID)
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources:

USS-11: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage service outside of urbanized areas:
(a) FMFCD shall conduct preliminary investigations on
undeveloped lands outside of highly urbanized areas.

These investigations shall examine wetland hydrology,
vegetation and soil types. These preliminary
investigations shall be the basis for making a
determination on whether or not more in- depth wetland
studies shall be necessary. If the proposed project site does not exhibit wetland hydrology, support a
prevalence of wetland vegetation and wetland soil types then no further action is required.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
development
approvals
outside of highly
urbanized areas
California
Regional
Water Quality
Control Board
(RWQCB), and
USACE
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-11 (continued from previous page):
(b) Where proposed activities c ould have an impact on
areas verified by the USACE as jurisdictional wetlands
or waters of the U.S. (urban and rural streams, seasonal wetlands, and vernal pools), FMFCD shall obtain the
necessary Clean Water Act, Section 404 permits for
activities where fill material shall be placed in a wetland, obstruct the flow or circulation of waters of the United States, impair or reduce the reach of such waters . (A s part of FMFCD’s Memorandum of Understanding, with
CDFW, Section 404 and 401 permits would be obtaine d
from the U SACE and RWQCB f or any activity involving
filling of jurisdictional waters .) At a minimum, to meet “no net loss policy,
” the permits shall require
replacement of wetland habitat at a 1:1 ratio.
(c) Where proposed activities could have an impac t on
areas verified by the USACE as jurisdictional wetlands
or waters of the U.S. (urban and rural streams, seasonal wetlands, and vernal pools), FMFCD shall submit and
implement a wetland mitigation plan based on the
wetland acreage verified by the USACE . The wetland
mitigation plan shall be prepared by a qualified biologist or wetland scientist experienced in wetland creation, and shall include the following or equally effective elements:
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
A - Incorporat
ed into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-11 (further continued from previous two pages)
i. Specific location, size, and existing hydrology and
soils within the wetland creation area.
ii. Wetland mitigation techniques, seed source,
planting specifications, and required buffer
setbacks. In addition, the mitigation plan shall
ensure adequate water supply is provided to the
created wetlands in order to maintain the proper
hydrologic regimes required by the different types
of wetlands created. Provisions to ensure the
wetland water supply is maintained in perpetuity
shall be included in the plan.
iii. A monitoring program for restored, enhanced,
created, and preserved wetlands on the project
site. A monitoring program is required to meet three
objectives; 1) establish a wetland creation success
criteria to be met ;
2) to specify monitoring
methodology; 3) to identify as far as is possible,
specific remedial actions that will be required in
order to achieve the success criteria; and 4) to
document the degree of success achieved in
establishing wetland vegetation.
(continued on next page)
[see Page 41] [see Page 41]
A - Incorpor
ated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-11 (further continued from previous three pages) (d) A monitoring plan shall be developed and implemented by a qualified biologist to monitor results of any on- site wetland restoration and creation for five years. The
monitoring plan shall include specific success criteria, frequency and timing of monitor ing, and assessment of
whether or not maintenance activities are being carried out and how these shall be adjusted if necessary.

If monitoring reveals that success criteria are not being met, remedial habitat creation or restoration should be designed and implemented by a qualified biologist and
subject to five years of monitoring as described above.

Or
(e) In lieu of developing a mitigation plan that outlines the avoidance, purchase, or creation of wetlands, FMFCD
could purchase mitigation credits throug h a Corps
approved Mitigation Bank.

Verification comments:
[see Page 41] [see Page 41]
A - Incorporat
ed into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS -12: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage
service outside in areas that support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools:
(a) During facility design and prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities in areas that support seasonal
wetlands or vernal pools, FMFCD shall conduct a
preliminary rare plant assessment. The assessment will determine the likelihood on whether or not the project
site could support rare plants. If it is determined that the project site would not support rare plants, then no further action is required. However, if the project site has the potential to support rare plants; then a rare plant survey shall be conducted. Rare plant surveys shall be
conducted by qualified biologists in accordance with the most current CDFW/USFWS guidelines or protocols and
shall be conducted at the time of year when the plants in question are identifiable.
(b) Based on the results of the survey, prior to design approval, FMFCD shall coordinate with CDF W and/or
implement a Section 7 consultation with USFWS, shall
(continued on next page)
During FMFCD
facility design
and prior to
initiation of
ground
disturbing
activities in
areas that
support seasonal
wetlands or
vernal pools
California
Department of
Fish & Wildlife
(CDFW) and
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
(USFWS)
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-12 (continued from previous page)
determine whether the project facility would result in a significant impact to any special status plant species.

Evaluation of project impacts shall consider the
following:
• The status of the species in question ( e.g., officially listed by the State or Federal Endangered Species
Acts).
• The relative density and distribution of the on- site occurrence versus typical occurrences of the
species in question.
• The habitat quality of the on- site occurrence relative to historic, c urrent or potential distribution of the
population.
(c) Prior to design approval, and in consultation with the CDFW and/or the USFWS, FMFCD shall prepare and
implement a mitigation plan, in accordance with any
applicable State and/or federal statutes or laws, that
reduces impacts to a less than significant level.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
A - Incorporat
ed into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-12 (further continued from previous two pages)
• The habitat quality of the on- site occurrence relative to historic, current or potential distribution of the
population.
(c) Prior to design approval, and in consultation with the CDFW and/or the USFWS, FMFCD shall prepare and
implement a mitigation plan, in accordance with any
applicable State and/or federal statutes or laws, that
reduces impacts to a less than significant level.

Verification comments:
[see Page
45] [see Page 45]
MM USS-13: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage
service outside in areas that support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools:
(a) During facility design and prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities in areas that support seasonal
wetlands or vernal pools, FMFCD shall conduct a
preliminary survey to determine the presence of list ed vernal pool crustaceans.
(continued on next page)
During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
ground
disturbing
activities in
areas that
support seasonal
wetlands or
vernal pools
CDFW and
USFWS
A - Inc
orporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-13 (continued from previous page)
(b) If potential habitat (vernal pools, seasonally inundated areas) or fairy shrimp exist within areas proposed to be disturbed, FMFCD shall complete the first and second
phase of fairy shrimp presence or absence surveys. If an absence finding is determined and accepted by the
USFWS, then no further mitigation shall be required for fairy shrimp.
(c) If fairy shrimp are found to be present within vernal pools or other areas of inundation to be impacted by the
implementation of storm drainage facilities, FMFCD shall mitigate impacts on fairy shrimp habitat in accordance
with the USFWS requirements of the Programmatic
Biological Opinion. This shall include on -site or off -site creation and/or preservation of fairy shrimp habitat at ratios ranging from 3:1 to 5:1 depending on the habitat impacted and the choice of on- site or off -site mitigation.

Or mitigation shall be the purchase of mitigation credit through an accredited mitigation bank.

Verification comments:
[see previ
ous
page]
[see previous
page]
A - Incorporat
ed into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-14: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in an area where elderberry bushes may occur:
(a) During facilit y design and prior to initiation of
construction activities, FMFCD shall conduct a project - specific survey for all potential Valley Elderberry
Longhorn Beetle (VELB) habitats (elderberry shrubs),
including a stem count and an assessment of historic or current VELB habitat.
(b) FMFCD shall avoid and protect all potential identified VELB habitat where feasible.
(c) Where avoidance is infeasible, develop and implement a VELB mitigation plan in accordance with the most
current USFWS mitigation guidelines for unavoidable
take of VELB habitat pursuant to either Section 7 or
Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act.

The mitigation plan shall include, but might not be limited to, relocation of elderberry shrubs, planting of elderberry shrubs, and monit
oring of relocated and planted
elderberry shrubs.

Verification comments:

During f
acility
design and prior
to initiation of
construction
activities
CDFW and
USFWS
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-15: Prior to ground disturbing activities during nesting season (March through July) for a FMFCD drainage facility project that supports bird nesting habitat, FMFCD shall conduct a survey of trees. If nests are found during the survey, a qualified biologist shall assess the nesting activity on the project site. If active nests are located, no
construction activities shall be allowed within 250 feet of the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities are planned during the no n- breeding period (August through February), a nest survey is not necessary.

Verification comments:

Prior t
o ground
disturbing
activities during
nesting season
(March through
July) for a
project that
supports bird
nesting habitat
CDFW and
USFWS
MM USS-16: W hen FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in an area that supports burrowing owl nesting habitat:
(a) FMFCD shall conduct a pre- construction breeding -
season survey (approximately February 1 through
August 31) of proposed project sites in suitable habitat (e.g., canal berms, open grasslands with suitable
burrows) during the same calendar year that construction is planned to begin. If phased construction procedures are planned for the proposed project, the results of the (continued on next page)
Prior to, and
during, the
breeding season
(approximately
February 1
through
August 31) of the
same calendar
year that
construction is
planned to begin
CDFW and
USFWS
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-16 (continued from previous page)
above survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted
(b) During the construction stage, FMFCD shall avoid all burrowing owl nest sites potentially disturbed by project construction during the breeding season while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. The occupied nest
site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to
determine when the nest is no longer used. Avoidance
shall include the establishment of a 160- foot diameter non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site.

Disturbance of any nest sites shall only occur outside of the breeding season and when the nests are unoccupied
based on monitoring by a qualified biologist. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary
construction fencing.

Based on approval by CDF W, pre -construction and pre-
breeding season exclusion measures may be implemented to preclude burrowing owl occupation of the project site prior to project-related disturbance. Burrowing owls can be passively excluded fro m potential nest sites in the construction area, either by closing the burrows or placing one-way doors in the (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
A - Incorpor
ated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-16 (further continued from previous two pages)
burrows according to current CDF W protocol. Burrows shall be examined not more than 30 days before construction to ensure that no owls have recolonized the area of construction.

For each burrow destroyed, a new burrow shall be created (by installing artificial burrows at a ratio of 2:1 on protected lands nearby).

Verification comments:
[see Page 49] [see Page 49]
MM USS-17: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in the San Joaquin River corridor:
(a) FMFCD shall not conduct instream activities in the San Joaquin River between October 15 and April 15. If this is not feasible, FMFCD shall consult with the National
Marine Fisheries Service and CDFW on the appropriate
measures to be implemented in order to protect listed
salmonids in the San Joaquin River.
(b) Riparian vegetation shading the main channel that is removed or damaged shall be replaced at a ratio and
quantity sufficient to maintain the existing shading of the channel. The location of replacement trees on or within (continued on next page)
During instream
activities
conducted
between
October 15 and
April 15
National
Marine
Fisheries
Service
(NMFS),
CDFW, and
Central Valley
Flood
Protection
Board
(CVFPB)
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems / Biological Resources (continued):

MM USS-17 (continued from previous page)
FMFCD berms, detention ponds or river channels shall
be approved by FMFCD and the Central Valley Flood
Protection Board.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previ ous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems – Recreation / Trails:

MM USS-18: When FMFCD updates its District Service Plan:

Prior to final design approval of all elements of the District Services Plan, FMFCD shall consult with Fresno County, City of Fresno, and City of Clovis to determine if any element would temporarily disrupt or permanently displace adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities as a result of the proposed District Services Plan. If the proposed project would not temporarily disrupt or permanently displace adopted existing or planned trails, no further mitigation is necessary. If the proposed project would have an effect on the trails and associated facilities, FMFCD shall implement the following:
(continued on next page)
Prior to final
design approval
of all elements of
the FMFCD
District Service
Plan

DARM, PW,
City of Clovis,
and County of
Fresno
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems – Recreation / Trails (continued):

MM USS-18 (continued from previous page)
(a) If short-term disruption of adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities occur, FMFCD shall consult and coordinate with Fresno County, City of Fresno, and City of Clovis to temporarily re- route the trails and associated facilities.
(b) If permanent displacement of the adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities occur, the appropriate design modifications to prevent permanent displacement shall be implemented in the final project
design or FMFCD shall replace these facilities.

Verification comments:
[see previ
ous
page]
[see previous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems – Air Quality:

MM USS-19: When District drainage facilities are
constructed, FMFCD shall:
(a) Minimize idling time of construction equipment vehicles to no more than ten minutes, or require that engines be shut off when not in use.
(continued on next page)
During storm
water drainage
facility
construction
activities
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control
District and

SJVAPCD
A - Incor
porated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems – Air Quality (continued):

MM USS-19 (continued from previous page)
(b) Construction shall be curtailed as much as possible when the Air Quality Index (AQI) is above 150. AQI forecasts can be found on the SJVAPCD web site.
(c) Off-road trucks should be equipped with on-road engines if possible.
(d) Construction equipment should have engines that meet the current off-road engine emission standard (as certified by the California Air Resources Board), or be re-powered with an engine that meets this standard.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Storm Water Drainage Facilities:

MM USS-20: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing storm water drainage facilities, the City shall coordinate with FMFCD to evaluate the storm water drainage system and shall not approve additional development that would convey
additional storm water to a facility that would experience an exceedance of capacity until the necessary additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing storm
water drainage
facilities

FMFCD, PW,
and DARM
A - Incorporat
ed into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020
MMR CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. _____________

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Water Supply Capacity:

USS-21: Prior to exceeding existing water supply capacity, the City shall evaluate the water supply system and shall not approve additional development that demands additional
water until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct an approximately 25,000 AF/year tertiary recycled water expansion to the Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility in accordance with the 2013 Recycled Water Master Plan and the 201 4 City of Fresno Metropolitan Water Resources
Management Plan update.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure USS -5 is also required prior to approximately the year 2025.

Verification comments:

Prior t
o
exceeding
existing water
supply capacity
DPU and
DARM
Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Landfill Capacity:

USS-22: Prior to exceeding landfill capacity, the City shall evaluate additional landfill locations , and shall not approve additional development that could contribute solid waste to a landfill that is at capacity until additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior t
o
exceeding
landfill capacity
DPU and
DARM
A - Inc
orporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

December 2020

Appendix A

CalEEMod Report

Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 4.50 Acre 4.50 196,020.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Milburn/Dakota Park
Fresno County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 1 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1692 1.5349 1.5954 3.5600e-
003

0.1425 0.0635 0.2060 0.0576 0.0596 0.1172 0.0000 315.2924 315.2924 0.0571 0.0000 316.7201 2024 0.0717 0.6379 0.7494 1.6100e-
003

0.0321 0.0252 0.0573 8.7000e-
003

0.0237 0.0324 0.0000 142.2824 142.2824 0.0261 0.0000 142.9347 Maximum 0.1692 1.5349 1.5954 3.5600e-
003

0.1425 0.0635 0.2060 0.0576 0.0596 0.1172 0.0000 315.2924 315.2924 0.0571 0.0000 316.7201 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1692 1.5349 1.5954 3.5600e-
003

0.1425 0.0635 0.2060 0.0576 0.0596 0.1172 0.0000 315.2921 315.2921 0.0571 0.0000 316.7199 2024 0.0717 0.6379 0.7494 1.6100e-
003

0.0321 0.0252 0.0573 8.7000e-
003

0.0237 0.0324 0.0000 142.2823 142.2823 0.0261 0.0000 142.9346 Maximum 0.1692 1.5349 1.5954 3.5600e-
003

0.1425 0.0635 0.2060 0.0576 0.0596 0.1172 0.0000 315.2921 315.2921 0.0571 0.0000 316.7199 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 2 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.8500e-
003

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 8.0000e-
003

0.0944 0.0724 4.4000e-
004

0.0257 2.3000e-
004

0.0260 6.9400e-
003

2.1000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

0.0000 41.0095 41.0095 3.6400e-
003

0.0000 41.1005
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0792 0.0000 0.0792 4.6800e- 003

0.0000 0.1961
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4592 5.4592 2.5000e- 004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Total 9.8500e-
003

0.0944 0.0725 4.4000e-
004

0.0257 2.3000e-
004

0.0260 6.9400e-
003

2.1000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

0.0792 46.4688 46.5479 8.5700e-
003

5.0000e-
005

46.7773
Unmitigated Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 4-3-2023 7-2-2023 0.4746 0.4746
2 7-3-2023 10-2-2023 0.6287 0.6287
3 10-3-2023 1-2-2024 0.6285 0.6285
4 1-3-2024 4-2-2024 0.5866 0.5866
5 4-3-2024 7-2-2024 0.1051 0.1051
Highest 0.6287 0.6287
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 3 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.8500e-
003

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 8.0000e-
003

0.0944 0.0724 4.4000e-
004

0.0257 2.3000e-
004

0.0260 6.9400e-
003

2.1000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

0.0000 41.0095 41.0095 3.6400e-
003

0.0000 41.1005
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0792 0.0000 0.0792 4.6800e- 003

0.0000 0.1961
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.4592 5.4592 2.5000e- 004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Total 9.8500e-
003

0.0944 0.0725 4.4000e-
004

0.0257 2.3000e-
004

0.0260 6.9400e-
003

2.1000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

0.0792 46.4688 46.5479 8.5700e-
003

5.0000e-
005

46.7773
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 4 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2023 5/5/2023 5 5 2 Grading Grading 5/6/2023 5/17/2023 5 8
3 Building Construction Building Construction 5/18/2023 4/3/2024 5 230 4 Paving Paving 4/4/2024 4/29/2024 5 18
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/30/2024 5/23/2024 5 18 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 5 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 82.00 32.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 16.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 6 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0452 0.0000 0.0452 0.0248 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

3.1700e-
003

3.1700e-
003

2.9100e-
003

2.9100e-
003

0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Total 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

0.0452 3.1700e-
003

0.0483 0.0248 2.9100e-
003

0.0277 0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 7 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.2790 0.2790 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2792
Total 1.6000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.2790 0.2790 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2792
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0452 0.0000 0.0452 0.0248 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

3.1700e-
003

3.1700e-
003

2.9100e-
003

2.9100e-
003

0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Total 6.6500e-
003

0.0688 0.0456 1.0000e-
004

0.0452 3.1700e-
003

0.0483 0.0248 2.9100e-
003

0.0277 0.0000 8.3627 8.3627 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.4303
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 8 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.2790 0.2790 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2792
Total 1.6000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

9.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.2790 0.2790 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.2792
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
003

3.1000e-
003

2.8500e-
003

2.8500e-
003

0.0000 10.4243 10.4243 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Total 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

0.0262 3.1000e-
003

0.0293 0.0135 2.8500e-
003

0.0163 0.0000 10.4243 10.4243 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 9 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3720 0.3720 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3722
Total 2.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3720 0.3720 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3722
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

3.1000e-
003

3.1000e-
003

2.8500e-
003

2.8500e-
003

0.0000 10.4242 10.4242 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Total 6.8400e-
003

0.0717 0.0590 1.2000e-
004

0.0262 3.1000e-
003

0.0293 0.0135 2.8500e-
003

0.0163 0.0000 10.4242 10.4242 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.5085
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 10 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3720 0.3720 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3722
Total 2.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.3720 0.3720 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3722
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1274 1.1652 1.3158 2.1800e-
003

0.0567 0.0567 0.0533 0.0533 0.0000 187.7618 187.7618 0.0447 0.0000 188.8785 Total 0.1274 1.1652 1.3158 2.1800e-
003

0.0567 0.0567 0.0533 0.0533 0.0000 187.7618 187.7618 0.0447 0.0000 188.8785 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 11 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.9900e-
003

0.2160 0.0334 7.0000e-
004

0.0172 2.1000e-
004

0.0174 4.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
004

5.1600e-
003

0.0000 66.9077 66.9077 5.4800e-
003

0.0000 67.0448
Worker 0.0229 0.0129 0.1394 4.6000e-
004

0.0531 3.1000e-
004

0.0534 0.0141 2.9000e-
004

0.0144 0.0000 41.1849 41.1849 8.7000e-
004

0.0000 41.2067
Total 0.0279 0.2289 0.1728 1.1600e-
003

0.0703 5.2000e-
004

0.0708 0.0191 4.9000e-
004

0.0196 0.0000 108.0925 108.0925 6.3500e-
003

0.0000 108.2514
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1274 1.1652 1.3158 2.1800e-
003

0.0567 0.0567 0.0533 0.0533 0.0000 187.7616 187.7616 0.0447 0.0000 188.8783 Total 0.1274 1.1652 1.3158 2.1800e-
003

0.0567 0.0567 0.0533 0.0533 0.0000 187.7616 187.7616 0.0447 0.0000 188.8783 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 12 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.9900e-
003

0.2160 0.0334 7.0000e-
004

0.0172 2.1000e-
004

0.0174 4.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
004

5.1600e-
003

0.0000 66.9077 66.9077 5.4800e-
003

0.0000 67.0448
Worker 0.0229 0.0129 0.1394 4.6000e-
004

0.0531 3.1000e-
004

0.0534 0.0141 2.9000e-
004

0.0144 0.0000 41.1849 41.1849 8.7000e-
004

0.0000 41.2067
Total 0.0279 0.2289 0.1728 1.1600e-
003

0.0703 5.2000e-
004

0.0708 0.0191 4.9000e-
004

0.0196 0.0000 108.0925 108.0925 6.3500e-
003

0.0000 108.2514
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0500 0.4571 0.5497 9.2000e-
004

0.0209 0.0209 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 78.8287 78.8287 0.0186 0.0000 79.2947 Total 0.0500 0.4571 0.5497 9.2000e-
004

0.0209 0.0209 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 78.8287 78.8287 0.0186 0.0000 79.2947 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 13 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0400e-
003

0.0900 0.0133 2.9000e-
004

7.2100e-
003

9.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
003

2.0800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

0.0000 27.8709 27.8709 2.3200e-
003

0.0000 27.9290
Worker 9.0000e-
003

4.8800e-
003

0.0538 1.8000e-
004

0.0223 1.3000e-
004

0.0224 5.9200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

6.0400e-
003

0.0000 16.6121 16.6121 3.3000e-
004

0.0000 16.6203
Total 0.0110 0.0949 0.0672 4.7000e-
004

0.0295 2.2000e-
004

0.0297 8.0000e-
003

2.0000e-
004

8.2100e-
003

0.0000 44.4830 44.4830 2.6500e-
003

0.0000 44.5493
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0500 0.4571 0.5497 9.2000e-
004

0.0209 0.0209 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 78.8286 78.8286 0.0186 0.0000 79.2946 Total 0.0500 0.4571 0.5497 9.2000e-
004

0.0209 0.0209 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 78.8286 78.8286 0.0186 0.0000 79.2946 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 14 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0400e-
003

0.0900 0.0133 2.9000e-
004

7.2100e-
003

9.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
003

2.0800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

0.0000 27.8709 27.8709 2.3200e-
003

0.0000 27.9290
Worker 9.0000e-
003

4.8800e-
003

0.0538 1.8000e-
004

0.0223 1.3000e-
004

0.0224 5.9200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

6.0400e-
003

0.0000 16.6121 16.6121 3.3000e-
004

0.0000 16.6203
Total 0.0110 0.0949 0.0672 4.7000e-
004

0.0295 2.2000e-
004

0.0297 8.0000e-
003

2.0000e-
004

8.2100e-
003

0.0000 44.4830 44.4830 2.6500e-
003

0.0000 44.5493
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.9300e-
003

0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.9300e-
003

0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 15 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.0725 1.0725 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0731
Total 5.8000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.0725 1.0725 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0731
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 7.9300e-
003

0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.9300e-
003

0.0745 0.1100 1.7000e-
004

3.5900e-
003

3.5900e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

0.0000 14.7423 14.7423 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8581
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 16 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.0725 1.0725 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0731
Total 5.8000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.0725 1.0725 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0731
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6300e-
003

0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Total 1.6300e-
003

0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 17 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

2.7800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

3.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.8580 0.8580 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8584
Total 4.6000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

2.7800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

3.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.8580 0.8580 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8584
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6300e-
003

0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Total 1.6300e-
003

0.0110 0.0163 3.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 2.3012
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 18 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

2.7800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

3.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.8580 0.8580 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8584
Total 4.6000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

2.7800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1600e-
003

3.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.8580 0.8580 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8584
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 19 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 8.0000e-
003

0.0944 0.0724 4.4000e-
004

0.0257 2.3000e-
004

0.0260 6.9400e-
003

2.1000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

0.0000 41.0095 41.0095 3.6400e-
003

0.0000 41.1005
Unmitigated 8.0000e-
003

0.0944 0.0724 4.4000e-
004

0.0257 2.3000e-
004

0.0260 6.9400e-
003

2.1000e-
004

7.1500e-
003

0.0000 41.0095 41.0095 3.6400e-
003

0.0000 41.1005

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 8.51 102.38 75.33 67,166 67,166
Total 8.51 102.38 75.33 67,166 67,166
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6

5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.501421 0.030018 0.171383 0.107490 0.013683 0.004097 0.033773 0.127911 0.002341 0.001406 0.004884 0.001058 0.000535 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 20 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 21 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 22 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.8500e-
003

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Unmitigated 1.8500e-
003

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 23 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.8400e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Total 1.8400e-
003

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.8400e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Total 1.8400e-
003

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-
005
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 24 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 5.4592 2.5000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Unmitigated 5.4592 2.5000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

5.36167

5.4592 2.5000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Total 5.4592 2.5000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Unmitigated

7.0 Water Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 25 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

5.36167

5.4592 2.5000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Total 5.4592 2.5000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

5.4806
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0792 4.6800e-
003

0.0000 0.1961
Unmitigated 0.0792 4.6800e-
003

0.0000 0.1961
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 26 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.39 0.0792 4.6800e-
003

0.0000 0.1961
Total 0.0792 4.6800e-
003

0.0000 0.1961
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.39 0.0792 4.6800e-
003

0.0000 0.1961
Total 0.0792 4.6800e-
003

0.0000 0.1961
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 27 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 2/9/2021 4:03 PMPage 28 of 29 Milburn/Dakota Park - Fresno County, Annual

Appendix B

Biological Evaluation

Biological Resource Assessment
Milburn and Dakota Avenue Community Park Development Project Assessor Parcel Number 511-200-30T
Fresno, CA

Prepared for

324 South Santa Fe Street, Suite A
Visalia, CA 93292

Prepared by

1401 Fulton St, Suite 918
Fresno, CA 93721

December 18, 2020

1. Executive Summary
4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks) has tasked Soar Environmental Consulting to provide biological habitat assessment services as part of an IS/MND for a neighborhood park development. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of North Milburn Avenue and West Dakota Avenue in the City of Fresno, California. The property is comprised of Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 511 -200-30T and totals 3.98 acres. The Project site is located in the U nited States Geological Survey Herndon 7.5 -minute quadrangle and Fresno North 7.5-minute quadrangle at an elevation of approximately 285 feet above mean sea level. Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc. prepared this Habitat Assessment Report for 4Creeks, Inc ., in support of the California Environmental Quality Act requirements.

Prior to field activities, Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc. conducted research of the California Natural Diversity Database and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Consultation to learn which species may potentially be present onsite. On December 7, 2020, Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc. performed an assessment of the Project site. The purpose of the pedestrian habitat assessment survey was to search for the presence of special-status species that have historically been observed within, or surrounding, the Project site.

Database research suggested that a Habitat Assessment was necessary to search for the potential presence of San Joaquin kit f ox, blunt -nosed leopard, giant garter snake, California red legged frog, California tiger salamander, Delta smelt, vernal pool fairy shrimp, Swainson's hawk, California thrasher, Costa’s hummingbird, Lawrence’s goldfinch, Nuttall’s woodpecker, Rufous hummingbird, spotted towhee, Hartweg's golden sunburst, San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass, hairy Orcutt grass, and succulent owl's-clover.

While none of the aforementioned listed species were observed during the Habitat Survey, potentially suitable habitat feat ures exist for the following species: blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia silus), Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni), San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), California t hrasher (Toxostoma redivivum), Costa’s Hummingbird (Calypte costae) Lawrence’s G oldfinch (Carduelis lawrencei), Nuttall’s Woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii), Rufous Hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus), Spotted Towhee (Pipilo maculatus clementae).

Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc. recommends that a biologist assess the following features prior to the commencement of ground disturbance activities: burrows of 3 inches or greater for San Joaquin kit fox; trees and shrubs within and surrounding the Project footprint for nesting raptors and other Migratory Bird Treaty Act protected species. Construction should be avoided during the nesting season (March 1 to September 15), or a preconstruction survey for listed species should be conduc ted. In addition, active raptor nests should be avoided by at least 150 feet and non-raptor nests should be avoided by at least 50 feet; all potential San Joaquin kit fox dens (with openings greater than 4-inches) should be avoided by 50 feet until it can be determined that none are present.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................2

2. Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 5

3. Methods................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .....7

3.1. Literature Review .......................................................................................................................... 7

3.2. Pedestrian Biological Assessment ................................................................................................ 8

3.2.1. Field Reconnaissance Methodology ........................................................................................ 8

3.2.2. Field Reconnaissance Photos .................................................................................................. 9

3.2.3. Field Reconnaissance Results ................................................................................................ 13

3.3. Plants ........................................................................................................................................... 19

3.3.1. California jewelflower (Caulanthus californicus) ............................................................ 19

3.3.2 San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass (Orcuttia inaequalis) ......................................................... 19

3.3.3. Hairy Orcutt grass (Orcuttia inaequlis) ............................................................................ 19

3.3.4. Succulant owl’s clover (Castilleja camperstris) ............................................................... 20

3.3.6. Hartweg's golden sunburst (Pseudobahia bahiifolia) ..................................................... 20

3.4. Invertebrates ............................................................................................................................... 20

3.4.1. Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) ............................................................... 20

3.5. Fish............................................................................................................................................... 21

3.5.1. Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) ............................................................................ 21

3.6. Reptiles ........................................................................................................................................ 21

3.6.1. Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia silus) ...................................................................... 21

3.6.2. Giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas) ............................................................................. 21

3.7. Amphibians ................................................................................................................................. 22

3.7.1. California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) ....................................................................... 22

3.7.2. California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense)................................................. 22

3.8. Birds ............................................................................................................................................. 22

3.8.1. Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni) ................................................................................ 23

3.8.2 California trasher (Toxostoma redivivum) ............................................................................ 23

3.8.3 Costa’s Hummingbird (Calypte costae) ................................................................................. 23

3.8.4 Lawrence’s Goldfinch (Carduelis lawrencei) ......................................................................... 23

3.8.5 Nuttall’s Woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii) ............................................................................. 24

3.8.6 Rufous Hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus) ............................................................................ 24

3.8.7 Spotted Towhee (Pipilo maculatus clementae) .................................................................... 24

3.9. Mammals ......................................................................................................................................... 25

3.9.1. San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) ................................ ............................... 25

4. Presence of Potential Jurisdictional Waters or Wetlands ................................ ............................... 25

5. Findings ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 25

6. Recommendations ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 28

7. Study Limitations ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 28 Works Cited ................................ ................................ ............................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

2. Introduction
4Creeks, Inc. (4Creeks) has tasked Soar Environmental Consulting with conducting a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Initial Study for the Milburn and Dakota Master Planned Community Park project within the City of Fresno, California. As part of this Initial Study, 4Creeks seeks an environmental consulting firm to provide biological services. The proposed project is comprised of a parking lot, multi-use field, a stage with cover, child and toddler play areas with shade sails, a water play area, restrooms with showers, large and small picnic shelters, a dog park, skatepark and rubberized jogging track. There will also be multi-use courts for basketball, futsal, tennis and pickleball. The Project site is located in the United States Geological Sur vey Herndon 7.5-minute quadrangle and Fresno North

7.5-minute quadrangle at an elevation of approximately 285 feet above mean sea level. The project area is split on the east and west border of these two quadrangles at Township 13s, Range 19e, section 23.

Soar Environmental Consulting, Inc. (Soar Environmental) prepared this Habitat Assessment Report for 4Creeks, in support of the CEQA requirements.

Prior to field activities, Soar Environmental researched the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), to learn which species may potentially be present onsite. Soar Environmental researched specific species and habitat requirements for the species noted in the CNDDB and IPaC databases and included proximal species observations and species status in this report.

A pedestrian habitat assessment was conducted in the project area on December 7, 2020, by Soar biologist Travis Albert. The plant communit y is dominated by Russian thistle (Kali targus) a non -native tumble weed, and shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). The ground is highly disturbed from tilling, exposing o bare earth that appears to be alkaline and very dry. There are no drainages or surface water and little to no grass. There is one Fremont cottonwood tree (Populus fremontii) along the eastern boundary with 2 woodpecker cavities (not large enough to be nest cavities). There are no other trees and one small tree of heaven shrub near the southeast corner of the Project boundary. Along the north fence on the west side there is a live oak along the fence on the school yard side with a nest near the top of the tree (Fig 12 & 13). To the west there is a church parking lot and residential properties to the east and south. There is potential nesting habitat in the trees and shrubs around the Project site , but there is no nesting habitat within the project boundary.

Figure 1 – Project Location

Figure 2 – Project Site Boundary

Figure 3 – Habitat Assessment Survey Route

3. Methods

3.1. Literature Review
Prior to performing the habitat assessment, Soar Environmental conducted a review of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Rare Plant Inventory for the Clovis, Fresno North, Fresno South, Friant, Gregg, Herndon, Kearney Park, Lanes Bridge, and Malaga 7.5-minute USGS quadrangles and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC).

The CNDDB search indicated that the Federal and/or State-listed special-status wildlife species most likely to occur within or near the Project site are Swainson’s hawk, vernal pool fairy shrimp, California tiger salamander, tricolored blackbird, valley elderberry longhorn beetle and San Joaquin kit fox. Fresno kangaroo rat (FKR) appeared in the CNDDB search, however FKR is listed as extirpated in CNDDB and will not be mentioned further for this reason. Rare and endangered plants known from the region include California Jewelflower, Hartweg’s golden sunburst, succulent owl’s clover, San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass and Hairy Orcutt grass.

The IPaC search revealed Federally listed sensitive species likely to occur within or near the Project site are San Joaquin kit fox, blunt-nosed leopard lizard, giant garter snake, California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, delta smelt, vernal pool fairy shrimp. The Federally listed plants species known from the region are fleshy owl’s clover, hairy Orcutt grass, San Joaquin Orcutt grass.

3.2. Pedestrian Biological Assessment

3.2.1. Field Reconnaissance Methodology
On December 7, 20 20, Soar Environmental biologist Travis Albert began the pedestrian habitat assessment beginning from the northwest corner of the project boundary from Milburn Avenue, parallel to the John Steinbeck Elementary school. He noted a passerine bird nest in a large live oak tree along the fence (Figures 12 & 13). The nest tree is approximately 4 meters north of the project boundary on the schoolyard side. Although the nest is not within the project boundary, it is close enough to be affected by noise disturban ce from project activities. Proceeding east along the northern boundary, Mr. Albert noted numerous small mammal burrows within the Project Footprint, averaging approximately 3 inches in diameter.

From the northwest corner proceeding south along the eastern boundary there was a peculiar rodent den that appeared to be stuffed with oranges from an orange tree on the adjec t residential property to the east (Figure 16 & 17). Inside the eastern boundary there is a cottonwood tree with 2 woodpecker cavities, too shallow to be nest cavities (Figure 15).

The southern boundary parallels Dakota Avenue. Other than small mammal burrows , there are no distinguishing characteristics along the southern boundary. The southwest corner of the project site is at the intersection of Dakota Avenue and Milburn Avenue. There are no distinguishing characteristics along the western boundary which parallels Milburn Avenue.

After surveying the perimeter of the project area, the biologist walked 2 rectangular survey route s, interior and parallel to the boundary, effectivel y covering the entire parcel. Other than multiple small mammal burrows all over the project site there are no other suitable habitat characteristics for any of the above mentioned species.

3.2.2. Field Reconnaissance Photos

Figure 4 – Northern Site Boundary (View west from Milburn Ave)

Figure 5 – Northern Site Boundary (View east)

Figure 6 – East Site Boundary (View south)

Figure 7 – Southern Site Boundary (View west)

Figure 8 – Southern Site Boundary (View east)

Figure 9 – Western Site Boundary (View north)

Figure 10 – Center of Parcel (View east)

Figure 11 – Center of Parcel (View west)

3.2.3. Field Reconnaissance Results
During the field reconnaissance, there were no observations of special -status species. The Project site is an open field, heavily disturbed from tilling, or agricultural equipment, although there is no sign of agricultural crops. The field is dominated by Russian thistle (an invasive, non-native tumbleweed), and shortpod mustard. The soil is alkaline, loose, and chalky, with large patches of bare earth and numerous connected small mammal burrows.

Wildlife species observed include ground squirrels, and California scrubjay. There was also a host of sparrows perching near a nest in the live oak tree depicted in (Figures 12 & 13). This Tree is approximately 4 meters north of the observation point 36.78702, -119.875195 (Figure 12).

Plant species observed include Russian thistle (Kali targus), shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), dove weed (Croton setigerus), and one cottonwood tree on the east boundary of the Project Site. There is also a valley live oak tree just outside the northern boundary of the Project Site.

The Project site contains potentially suitable habitat for the following species: San Joaquin kit fox, blunt- nosed leopard, and giant garter snake. Immediately outside the vicinity of the project area there are trees and bushes that create suitable nesting habitat for Swainson's hawk, Costa’s hummingbird, Lawrence’s goldfinch, Nuttall’s woodpecker, Rufous hummingbird, and the spotted towhee.

Figure 12 – Passerine Nest Tree (Valley Live Oak). The cyclone fence lays on the north boundary for the Project site. The tree is approximately 4m north of the boundary.

Figure 13 – Passerine Nest close-up. The nest is approximately 10ft down from the top of the tree. (Picture taken from 36.787246, 119.875235 orientated 336º NW)

Figure 18 – Soar Biologist observed a ground squirrel going into this burrow during the Habitat Assessment Reconnaissance. It is the most recent tailings pile observed on site.

Figure 14 – Canine Tracks 1 ¾ inches long. Larger than average San Joaquin kit fox tracks. It is most likely domestic dog, especially given the proximity to the schoolyard.

Figure 15 – Woodpecker Cavities (Cottonwood Tree).

Figures 16 & 17 – Small Mammal Burrow with Oranges Cached Inside. Most likely ground squirrels observed in on site and abundant in the area.

Figure 18 – Interconnected small mammal burrows.

Figures 19, 18 – Examples of typical small mammal burrows on the Project site. (Lines on the paper are 1 inch apart)

Figure 20 – Small mammal burrow

3.3. Plants

3.3.1. California jewelflower (Caulanthus californicus) California jewelflower (CJ) is listed as End angered on the Federal level and as Endangered on the State level. CJ is an annual herb in the mustard family, growing to approximately a foot (12 inches) tall, with white and maroon flowers. This is found only in the south San Joaquin valley and adjacent coastal ranges.

CJ has a blooming period between March and May.

During the field survey, the Soar Biologist did not observe signs of CJ within the Project footprint or surrounding areas. Potential suitable habitat is eliminated from ground disturbance , urbanization, and agricultural development in this area.

CNDDB records do not contain any observations of CJ in the Hendon or Fresno North 7.5-minute quadrangle in more than 30 years. According to CNDDB no habitat for this species remains in the vicinity of Fresno according to Taylor (1986).

3.3.2 San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass (Orcuttia inaequalis) San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass (SVOG) is a Federally Threatened and State Endangered. SVOG is a small, hairy, gray -green annual bunchgrass forming tuft s up to about 15 centimeters tall. A fluffy mass of inflorescent spikelets distinguishes this Orcutt grass from others, which have more spreading inflorescences. It occurs in wet land-riparian habitat, vernal -pools, and grassland and has a blooming period between April and September.

During the field survey, the Soar Biologist did not observe signs of SVOG within the Project footprint or surrounding areas. No wetlands, or vernal pool habitats occur in the Project site.

CNDDB records do not contain any o bservations of SVOG in the Hend on or Fresno North 7.5 -minute quadrangle. According to CNDDB records, the closest known occurrence of this species in Lanes Bridge

7.5-minute quadrangle, approximately 12 miles northeast of the Project site in June 2017.

3.3.3. Hairy Orcutt grass (Orcuttia inaequlis)
Hairy Orcutt grass (HO G) is listed as Federally and State Endangered. It grows in tufts consisting of numerous stems. Stems are 5 to 20 centimeters long and branch from only the lower nodes. The plant bears long, soft hairs and has a grayish appearance. The terrestrial leaves are 3 to 6 millimeters wide. The inflorescence is 5 to 10 centimeters long with flattened spikel ets. This species is typically found near streams, alluvial fans and within annual grasslands.

During the field survey, no HOG was observed within the project footprint or surrounding areas. The project site is too dry to be suitable habitat for this sp ecies and there is no evidence that vernal pools occur on the project site.

CNDDB record s do not contain any observations of HOG in the Hendon or Fresno North 7.5 -minute quadrangle. According to CNDDB records, the nearest occurrence of this species was r ecorded in the Gregg 7.5- minute quadrangle, more than 13 miles northwest of the Project site in June 2017.

3.3.4. Succulent owl’s clover (Castilleja camperstris) Succulent owl’s clover (SOC) is a Federally Threatened and State Endangered. It is a small herbaceous annual plant found in vernal pools of the eastern San Joaquin Valley. The stems are generally 5 to 25 cm (2-10 inches) tall and may be branched or unbranched. Branches end in short, dense, green inflorescences.

The leaves are succulent and brittle. Yellow or white flowers bloom in May. SOC is found in vernal pools along the eastern San Joaquin Valley in the Southern Sierra Foothills.

During the field survey, no SOC was observed wit hin the project footprint or surrounding areas. The habitat on the project site is too dry to be suitable habitat for this species and there is no evid ence that vernal pools occur on the project site.

CNDDB records do not contain any observations of SOG i n the Hendon or Fresno North 7.5 -minute quadrangle. According to CNDDB records, the nearest occurrence of this species was recorded in the Lanes Bridge 7.5- minute quadrangle, 12 miles northeast of the Project site in April 2019.

3.3.6. Hartweg's golden sunburst (Pseudobahia bahiifolia) Hartweg's golden sunburst (HGS) is listed as a Federally and State Endangered species. It is a slender, woolly annual flower with one or a few stems 6 to 15 centimeters (2 -6 inches) tall, covered with white, wooly hairs. Leaves are narrow, alternate, three -lobed or entire with three blunt teeth at the apex, and about 1 to 2 cm (0.4 to 0.8 in.) long. Bright yellow flower heads, produced in March or April. It occurs in open grasslands and grasslands at the margins of blue oak woodland, primarily on shallow, well-drained, fine-textured soils.

During the field survey, no HGS was observed within the project footprint or surrounding areas. CNDDB records do not contain any observations of SOG in the Hendon or Fresno Nor th 7.5-minute quadrangle.

According to CNDDB records, the nearest occurrence of this species was recorded in the Friant 7.5- minute quadrangle, more than 16 miles northeast of the Project site in April 2010.

3.4. Invertebrates

3.4.1. Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi)
Vernal pool fairy shrimp (VPFS) is listed as Threatened on the Federal level and has no listing on the State level. VPFS are 2 .5 centimeters (one inch) long, translucent crustaceans with 11 pairs of appendages.

VPFS are limited to vernal pool habitats in Oregon and California and do not occur in riverine, marine, or other permanent bodies of water where fish are present. During the wet season, the females produce hardy resting eggs, called cysts, which survive the dry season and hatch when the rains come again.

During the field survey, no signs of VPFS were observed within the Project footprint or surrounding areas.

The habitat on the Project Site is not suitable for VPFS as there are no vernal pool characteristics present (hydric soil, wetland vegetation, and hydrology).

CNDDB records do not contain any observations of VPFS in the Hendon or Fresno North 7.5 -minute quadrangles. According to CNDDB records, the nearest occurrence of this species in Fresno County was recorded in the Gregg 7.5- minute quadrangle, 11 miles northwest of the Project site in January 2017.

3.5. Fish

3.5.1. Delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus)
Delta smelt (DS) is listed as Threatened on the Federal level and Endangered on the State level. DS are 60- 70 millimeters (2-3 inches) long, slim bodied fish with a silver sheen. DS prefer shallow, fresh, or slightly brackish backwater sloughs and edgewaters with good water quality and substrate for spawning and are generally found in brackish waters below 25 degrees Celsius. The range of DS is restricted to the upper reaches of the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary.

The habitat on the Project site is not suitable for delta smelt as there is no waterway connecting this site to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary. According to CNDDB no record of DS observation has been recorded anywhere in Fresno County.

3.6. Reptiles

3.6.1. Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia silus)
Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (BNLL) is listed as Endangered on the Federal and the State level. BNLL have a light background with dark gray -brown spotting, giving it an almost Giraffe -like appearance. The body length of the BNLL ranges from 7 to 12 centimeters (3 to 5 inches), wit h a tail typically longer than the body. BNLL are found in the southern San Joaquin Valley and surrounding foothills and valleys. BNLL prefer flat areas with open space for running, includi ng semi -arid grasslands, alkali flats, and washes, utilize shrubs and small mammal burrows for cover and shelter, and typically avoid densely vegetated areas.

During the field survey, no signs of BNLL were observed within the Project footprint. There are multiple small mammal burrows present on -site that are potentially suitable habitat features for this species .

However, CNDDB records do not contain any observations of BNLL in the Herndon or Fresno North 7.5 - quadrangles, nor any of the adjacent quadrangles searched.

3.6.2. Giant garter snake (Thamnophis gigas)
Giant garter snake (GGS) is listed as Threatened on the Federal level. GGS are at least 162 centimeters (64 inches) long, with a brownish olive background, a yellow stripe down the center of the back, and a light- colored stripe on either side. GGS historically ranged from Kern County to Butte County, but due to habitat degradation, this species is thought to no longer occur south of Fresno County. GGS are found primarily in marshes, sloughs, drainage canals, irrigation ditches, and prefe rs locations with vegetation close to water for basking. GGS use small mammal burrows and vegetation piles for cover during hotter weather.

No signs of GGS were observed within the Project footprint or surro unding areas. The majority of small mammal burrows onsite are 3 inches or more which is too large for GGS and indicates a high density of

predators for this species. There is very little vegetation and no vegetated waterways or canals within the Project si te. Habitat for GGS on the Project site is poor , combined with surrounding urbanization the potential for occurrence of this species is very low, CNDDB records do not contain any observations of GGS in Fresno County.

3.7. Amphibians

3.7.1. California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii)
California red-legged frog (CRLF) is listed as Threatened on the Federal level and is considered a Species of Special Concern in California. CRLF are medium -sized frogs from 4.4 -13.3 centimeters (1.75 to 5.5 inches) long, with a slim waist, long legs, reddish brown, gray, or olive color with black flecks, dark mask on the head, and red on hind legs and lower belly. In the San Joaquin Valley, CRLF are not thought to occur south of Fresno County. CRLF are most commonly fo und in lowlands and foothills, p rimarily near ponds in humid forests, woodlands, grasslands, and coastal scrub, and prefer streamside locations with vegetative cover.

During the field survey, the Soar Biologist did not observe signs of CRLF within the Project footprint or surrounding areas. There are no water features within the Project area that would constitute habitat for this species. CNDDB records do not contain any observations of CRLF in the Herndon or Fresno North 7.5- quadrangles, nor any of the adjacent quadrangles searched for this report.

3.7.2. California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) California tiger salamander (CTS) is listed as Endangered in Santa Barbara and Sonoma Counties, and Threatened in the Central San Joaquin Va lley. Adult CTS rang e in size from 15 -22 centimeters (6 to 9 inches) long and have a dark background color with distinctive yellow spots. Juvenile CTS look much like adults but lack the yellow spots. Larval CTS are grayish green in color and have the appearance of tadpoles with obvious, external gills. CTS eggs are clear and are typically laid singly or in groups of three or four in shallow ponds. This endemic California species is found in grasslands, oak savannah woodlands, edges of mixed woodland, l ower elevations of coniferous forests, and in heavily grazed fields along the Central California Coast and within the Central San Joaquin Valley, however, CTS may breed in ditches where water is present for a long enough duration for eggs and larvae to metamorphose into adults. During the non-breeding season (approximately late May through early November), CTS live in small mammal burrows, typically those of ground squirrels and pocket gophers.

During the field survey, no signs of CTS were observed within the Project footprint or surrounding areas.

There are no suitable habitat features on site for this species. However, CNDDB records show the nearest most recent observation of CTS was 0.5 mile away in February 2017 , on a property near the corner of Ashlan Avenue and Blythe Avenue. The animal was relocated by a local Biologist.

3.8. Birds

3.8.1. Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni)
Swainson’s Hawk (SWHA) is listed as Threatened on the State level. SWHA favors open habitat for foraging such as agricultural fields, pastures, and row crops. They nest in scattered stands of eucalyptus, willow, oak, cottonwood, and conifers. On occasion, SWHA will nest on a power pole or transmission tower.

Nests are constructed with loose bundles of sticks and debris items. Incubatio n period is approximately 35 days and nesting period is 17-22 days. The breeding season for this species begins in March and ends in September.

During the site visit t here were no observation of S WHA. The area within and proximate to the Project Site is poor raptor nesting habitat due to urban development. However, there is foraging habitat on the Project Site. The nearest recent occurrence of SWHA was 14 miles north in the Lanes Bridge 7.5 minu te quadrangle in May 2017. CNDDB records do not contain any observations of SWHA in the Herndon or Fresno North 7.5-minute quadrangles.

3.8.2 California trasher (Toxostoma redivivum)
Habitat includes chaparral, foothills, valley thickets, parks, gardens. Within its range, found in practically any lowland habitat with dense low brush. Most common in chaparral, also occurs in streamside thickets and in suburban neighborhoods that have enough vegetation. Extends into edges of desert regions, and in chaparral in mountains up to about 6,000 feet. Nests are usually placed in a dense shrubs or thickets, less than 10 feet above the ground.

This species was not observed during the Site visit. No suitable habitat was observed on the Project site.

However, surrounding areas might contain pockets of potential suitable habitat for this species.

3.8.3 Costa’s Hummingbird (Calypte costae)
Costa's Hummingbirds occur in Sonoran and Mojave Desert scru b, coastal California chaparral and sage scrub, and deciduous forest and desert scrub in Baja California, Mexico. In the Sonoran Desert they occur in desert washes with palo verde, jojoba, desert lavender, or chuparosa, on steep rock slopes, and in lowlands with saguaro, creosote bush, and cholla cacti typically below 3,000 feet elevation.

Female Costa's Hummingbirds typically build a nest 3–7 feet above the ground in palo verde, ironwood, cholla, acacia, graythorn, and other shrubs. She frequently places the nest in relatively open areas without much vegetation cover.

This species was not observed during the Site visit. No suitable habitat was observed on the Project site.

However, surrounding areas might contain pockets of potential suitable habitat for this species.

3.8.4 Lawrence’s Goldfinch (Carduelis lawrencei)
Habitat includes o ak-pine woods, chaparral. Breeds locally in a variety of habitats including streamside trees, oak woodland, open pine woods, pinyon -juniper woods, chaparral. Often found close to water in dry country. In migration and winter, occurs in weedy fields, farmland, brushy areas, streamside’s.

Nest site is usually about 15 -20 feet above the ground in tree s such as oak, cypress, sycamore, or pine, sometimes lower in shrubs or up to 40' above the ground.

This species was not observed during the Site visit. No suitable habitat was observed on the Proje ct site.

However, surrounding areas might contain pockets of potential suitable habitat for this species.

3.8.5 Nuttall’s Woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii)
Habitat includes wooded canyons and foothills, river woods. In much of range almost always around oaks, especially where oaks meet other trees along rivers, also in pine -oak woods in foothills. In southern California also in riverside cottonwoods, sycamores, willows, even if no oaks present. At eastern edge of range may venture out into mesquite or other dry woods.

Nest sites are cavities in live or dead tree s, usually cottonwood, willow, or sycamore near oak wood s, sometimes in utility pole, fence post, or oak or another tree. Cavity usually 3 -35' above ground, sometimes up to 60' or higher. Male does most of excavating, new nest cavity every year.

This species was not observed during the Site visit. No suitable habitat was observed on the Project site.

However, surrounding areas might contain pockets of potential suitable habitat for this species.

3.8.6 Rufous Hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus)
Habitat includes forest edges, streamside’s, mountain meadows. Breeding habitat includes forest edges and clearings, and brushy second growth within the region of northern coast and mountains. Winters mostly in pine-oak woods in Mexico. Migrants occur at all elevations but more commonly in lowlands during spring, in mountain meadows during late summer and fall.

Nest site is usually well concealed in lower part of coniferous trees, deciduous shrubs, vines. Located 3- 30 feet above the ground, usually lower than 15 feet, although nests may be higher later in the season.

Old nests may be refurbished and reused. Nests are a compact cup of grasses, moss, plant down, spider webs, and other soft materials, the outside camouflaged with lichens and moss.

This species was not observed during the Site visit. No suitable habitat was observed on the Project site.

However, surrounding areas might contain pockets of potential suitable habitat for this species.

3.8.7 Spotted Towhee (Pipilo maculatus clementae)
Habitat includes open woods, undergrowth, brushy edges. In the varied terrain of the West, this towhee often lives in chaparral, mountain manzanita thickets, scrub oaks, or pinyon -juniper woods with dense understory.

Nest site is on the ground under a shrub, or in low bushes, usually less than 5 feet above the ground .

Nests are an open cup of grass, twigs, weeds, rootlets, strips of bark, lined with finer materials, sometimes including animal hair.

This species was not observed during the Site visit. No suitable habitat was observed on the Project site.

However, surrounding areas might contain pockets of potential suitable habitat for this species.

3.9. Mammals

3.9.1. San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)
The San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF) is listed as Threatened at the Federal level and Endangered at the State level. SJKF are petite, light-colored canids, approximately 50 centimeters (20 inches) in length, with bushy, black-tipped tails, large ears, and point ed snouts. SJKF are fond of alkali meadows, playas, grassland communities, scrubland, and wetland communities in the San Joaquin Valley and adjoining foothills. SJKF have adapted to human habitation and can also be found in more developed areas such as g olf courses, airports, and residential areas.

During the field survey, no signs of SJKF occupancy within the Project footprint or surrounding areas. Small mammal burrows were observed all over the project area, many with interconnected openings, others collapsed or with debris obstructing the openings. The openings measure 3 to 4 inches on average and lack the distinctive keyhole shape of SJKF dens. Most burrows do not appear to be currently used .

However, the Soar biologist witnessed a ground squirrel running into the burrow depicted in Figure #18.

Potential suitable habitat SJKF is poor due to the level of ground disturbance and urbanization around the Project site.

The closest and most recent occurrence of SJKF in the 9 quadrangle search of CNDDB records is in the Herndon 7.5-minute quadrangle approximately 2.75 mile northwest of the Project site in May 1993.

4. Presence of Potential Jurisdictional Waters or Wetlands The presence of potential jurisdictional waters or wetlands is determined through researching references located in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood inundation maps, general and community plans, mitigation plans, and technical support documents for application of the Clean Water Rule. No natural potential jurisdictional water features were observed on the Project site. The land in the Project area is absent of hydrophytic vegetation and the soil is very dry and friable.

5. Findings
The Project site is highly disturbed with tilling marks in the soil. Soil is alkaline and friable or easily crumbled, with ground squirrel burrows throughout the Project site. Vegetation is mostly Russian thistle (Kali targus), a non -native tumble weed, and shortpod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana). There are no drainages or surface water and little to no grass. There is one Fremont cottonwoo d tree (Populus fremontii) along the eastern boundary with 2 woodpecker cavities (not large enough to be nest cavities).

There are no other trees except one small tree of heaven shrub ( Trichostema lanceolatum) near the southeast corner of the Project bound ary. To the west there is a church parking lot and residential properties to the east and south. There is potential nesting habitat in the trees and shrubs around the Project site, but there is no nesting habitat within the project boundary.

The Project site contains potentially suitable habitat for the following species: San Joaquin kit fox, and blunt-nosed leopard. Immediately outside the vicinity of the project area there are trees and brush that

create suitable nesting habitat for Swainson's hawk, Costa’s hummingbird, Lawrence’s goldfinch, Nuttall’s woodpecker, Rufous hummingbird, and spotted towhee.

Species Name
Species
Observed on
Project Site
Suitable Habitat
on Project Site
San Joaquin orcutt grass
(Orcuttia inaequlis)
No No
Fleshy owl’s clove
(Orcuttia camperstris)
No No
Hairy orcutt grass
(Orcuttia Pilosa)
No No
Hartweg's golden sunburst
(Pseudobahia bahiifolia)
No No
vernal pool fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta lynchi)
No No
Delta smelt
(hypomesus transpacificus)
No No
blunt-nosed leopard lizard
(Gambelia silus)
No Yes
giant garter snake
(Thamnophis gigas)
No No
California red-legged frog
(Rana draytonii)
No No
California tiger salamander
(Ambystoma californiense)
No No
Swainson’s Hawk
(Buteo swainsoni)
No Yes
San Joaquin kit fox
(Vulpes macrotis mutica)
No Yes
California thrasher
(Toxostoma redivivum)
No Yes
Costa’s Hummingbird
(Calypte costae)
No Yes
Lawrence’s Goldfinch
(Carduelis lawrencei)
No Yes
Nuttall’s Woodpecker
(Picoides nuttallii)
No Yes
Rufous Hummingbird
(Selasphorus rufus)
No Yes
Spotted Towhee
(Pipilo maculatus clementae)
No Yes

6. Recommendations
Despite no special status species being observed during the pedestrian survey, suitable habitat for some of these species may be present within the proposed Project footprint, depending on the time of year that Project activities occur.

Blunt-nosed leopard lizard Recommendations
Soar Environmental recommends that any small mammal burrows within the Project footprint be surveyed for Blunt-nosed leopard lizard by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance activities. All blun t-nosed leopard lizard surveys will be performed in accordance with the most recent CDFW survey protocols (CDFW 2004).

California tiger salamander Recommendations
Although there is no suitable habitat for CTS on the Project site. CNDDB records note CTS adult observed and relocated ½ mile from the Project site in 2017. Soar Environmental recommends any small mammal burrows within the Pro ject footprint be surveyed for California tiger salamander by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to ground d isturbance activities, and verify burrows are clear of any wildlife species when ground disturbing activities occur. All amphibian surveys will be performed in accordance with the most recent USFWS/CDFW survey protocols (USFWS/CDFW 2003).

San Joaquin kit fox Recommendations
Soar Environmental recommends that the burrow areas identified in Figures 16 - 20, and any small mammal burrows with appropriate dimensions in those habitat areas be surveyed for San Joaquin kit fox by a qualified biologist no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance activities and verify burrows are clear of any wildlife species when ground disturbing activities occur . All mammal surveys will be performed in accordance with the most recent USFWS survey protocols (USFWS 1999).

Swainson’s Hawk and Nesting Bird Recommendations
Soar Environmental recommends performing construction activities outside the bird nesting season (February 15 to September 15). If Project activities are proposed during the nesting season, Soar Environmental recommends that the Project site and the surrounding utility poles be surveyed by a qualified biologist for nesting birds to avoid any adverse impacts leading to nest failure or abandonment.

Active nests of non-raptors should be avoided by at least 50 feet. Active nests of raptors should be avoided by at least 100 feet. All nests should be monitored during Project activities for signs of distress. If signs of distress are observed, Project activities should be adjusted to prevent further disturbance to the birds.

7. Study Limitations
This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted environmental methodologies and contains all the limitations inherent in these methodologies. The Report documents site conditions that were observed during field reconnaissance and do not apply to future conditions. No other warranties, expressed or implied, are made as to the professional services provided u nder the terms of our contract and included in this Report.

8. Works Cited

Bauder, E., Kreager, D. A., McMillan, S.C. (Sept. 1998). Recovery Plan for Vernal Pools of Southern California. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/Recovery-Planning/Vernal-Pool/

Calflora. (2020). Taxon Report. Retrieved from https://www.calflora.org

California Diversity Database (CNDDB). California Department of Fish and Wildlife RareFind.

Retrieved from https://map.dfg.ca.gov/rarefind

CDFW. (17 June 2013). California’s Vernal Pools. Retrieved from https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Plants/Vernal-Pools

CDFW. (May 1998). California Vernal Pool Assessment Preliminary Report.

CDFW. (2004). May 2004 Updated Version of the Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Survey Protocol.

Retrieved from https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey-Protocols#377281283-reptiles

CDFW. (March 20, 2018). Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities. Retrieved from https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18959&inline

Audubon Guide to North American Birds. (2020). https://www.audubon.org Calscape. (2020). Retrieved from https://calscape.org

Center for Biological Diversity. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.biologicaldiversity.org

eBird Database, Cornell University Lab of Ornithology. (2020). Retrieved from https://ebird.org

FEMA FIRM Mapping. (2020). Retrieved from https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=- 119.029797%20W%2C%2036.192520#searchresultsanchor

Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1999). Standardized Recommendations for the Protection of the San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance. Retrieved from https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey- Protocols#377281285-mammals

State Water Resources Control Board (12 April 2019). State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredge or Fill Material to Waters of the State. Retrieved from https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/cwa401/wrapp.html

US EPA/ US Department of the Army. (May 27, 2015). Technical Support Document for the Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-
05/documents/technical_support_document_for_the_clean_water_rule_1.pdf

US EPA. (Feb. 2010). Delta Smelt, Hypomesus transpacificus. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-08/documents/delta-smelt_0.pdf

USFWS. (20 Dec. 2017). Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Species Information. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es_species/accounts/amphibiansreptiles/ blunt_nosed_leopad_lizard/

USFWS. (6 Dec. 2017). California Tiger Salamander Species Information. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es_species/Accounts/Amphibians-Reptiles/ca_tiger_salamander/

USFWS. (2005). Revised Guidance on Site Assessment and Field Surveys for the California Red-legged Frog. Retrieved from https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey-Protocols#377281282- amphibians

USFWS. (Sept. 2007). Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp (Lepidurus packardi). Retrieved from https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/five_year_review/doc1160.pdf

USFWS and CDFW. (2003). Interim Guidance on Site Assessments and Field Surveys for Determining the Presence or a Negative Finding of the California Tiger Salamander. Retrieved from https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Survey-Protocols#377281282-amphibians

Appendix C

Cultural Records Search Results

To: Emily Huang Record Search 20-195
4 Creeks, Inc.
324 S. Santa Fe Street, Suite A
Visalia, CA 93292

Date: May 19, 2020

Re: Milburn/Dakota Park Project

County: Fresno

Map(s): Fresno North & Herndon 7.5’s

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH

The Cali fornia O ffice of Historic Pres ervation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical R esources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it availabl e to loca l, state, an d federal agencies, cu ltural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and t he public. Re commendations made by IC c oordinators or their st aff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the eval uation or opinion of the State Historic Preserva tion Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory an d excavation reports fi led with this office, a nd re sources l isted on the Nati onal Register of Histori c Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Di rectory, California State His torical L andmarks, Californi a Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic R esources, and California Points of Hist orical Interest. Due t o processing delays and other factors, n ot all of the historical resource reports and re source records that have been submitt ed to the OHP are available via this rec ords search. A dditional information may b e ava ilable through the federal, state, and local agencies t hat produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

P

RIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS

According to the information in ou r files, t here has been one prev ious cul tural resource st udy conducted within a small portion of the p roject area, FR -00287. Ther e ha ve been four additional previous cultural resource stud ies conducted within the one -half m ile radius , FR-00191, FR -00294, FR -02029, and FR - 02721.

Record Search 20-195

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS

There are no recorded resources within the project area, and it is not known if any exist there . There are two recorded resources within the one-half mile radius, P-10-005391 and P-10-005392. These resources are both historic era buildings.

There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register o f H istoric Places , the Cali fornia Reg ister of H istorical R esources, the Ca lifornia Points of Histo rical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

We understand this project consists of construction of a public park that will include new park amenities and landscaping on approximately 4.5 acres of vacant land. The one cultural resource study conducted on a small portion of project area wa s completed nearly 30 years ago. Due to changes in field methods and technology, a cultural resources study is only considered valid for up to five years. Because a cultural resources study has not been completed on most of this property, it is unknow n if cultural resources are p resent.

Therefore, prior to ground disturbance activities, we recommend a qualified, professional con sultant conduct a field survey of the ent ire project area to determine if cultural resources are present. A list of qualif ied consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will p rovide you wi th a curr ent li st of N ative A merican individuals/organizations that can assist you wi th information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to t he Native groups in t he area. The C ommission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file in order to determine what sacred resources, if any, ex ist within this p roject area and t he way in which th ese resources might be man aged. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

B
y:

Celeste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: May 19, 2020

Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Appendix D
Fuel Use Calculations
Construction Fuel Use Calculations
Daily Worker
Trips
Worker Trip
Length VMT/Day MPG Factor Gallons of
Gas/Day # of Days Total Gallons of
Gas
Site Preparation 18 10.8 194.4 25.3 7.7 5 38.4
Grading 15 10.8 162 25.3 6.4 8 51.2
Building Construction 82 10.8 885.6 25.3 35.0 230 8050.9 Paving 20 10.8 216 25.3 8.5 18 153.7
Architectural Coating 16 10.8 172.8 25.3 6.8 18 122.9
Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 279 8417.2
Daily Vendor
Trips
Vendor Trip
Length VMT/Day MPG Factor Gallons of
Diesel/Day # of Days Total Gallons of
Diesel
Building Construction 82 7.3 598.6 6.67 89.7 230 20641.37931 MPG Factor Calculation
Vehicle Class Fleet  Mix
2020 MPG
Factor
(EMFAC2014)
Average
MPG Factor
LDA 33% 29.6
LDT1 33% 24.46
LDT2 33% 21.75
MHD 50% 8.05
HHD 50% 5.47
Assumed Vehicle Fleet
for Workers 25.3
Assumed Vehicle Fleet
for Vendor Trips  6.76
Worker Trips
Vendor Trips