CONSIDERATION OF
Text Amendment
NO. P21-05809;
AND
THE RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
NO. P21-05809
PRESENTATION BY: DREW WILSON, SUPERVISING PLANNER
CITY COUNCIL HEARING | JUNE 30, 2022ID 22-989
BACKGROUND
• Two prior text amendments for Electric Fences have been considered by the Planning Commission and City Council:
• A Text Amendment Application was initiated by City Council on June 22, 2017 to reduce the requirements and risk for property and business owners to have a Security or electric fence installed.
• In 2018, staff initiated a text amendment to the Development Code to clarify the locations electric fences were permitted as part of a group of minor changes to the Development Code in order to improve functionality, clarity, and internal consistency.
• Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. submitted a proposed Text Amendment on behalf of Amarok, LLC (formerly known as Electric Guard Dog) to amend Section 15-2010 of the Fresno Municipal Code to:
• Increase the Zone Districts where electrified fences are permitted
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
MUNICIPAL CODE FINDINGS
A. The Code text amendment is consistent with the General Plan (GP) and any operative plans:
• Response: The proposed project is not consistent with said plans because it would compromise the safe walkability, diminish the overall image, connectivity and design of current and future complete neighborhoods, commercial areas, and public space that could be better protected through Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. The Fresno General Plan has several Goals, Objectives, and Policies that conflict with the proposed text amendment. Specifically, the proposed text amendment is inconsistent with two General Plan Goals, six Objectives, and thirteen Policies
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
MUNICIPAL CODE FINDINGS
B. The text amendment is consistent with the purpose of the Development Code to promote the growth of the city in an orderly and sustainable manner and to promote and protect the public health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare.
• Response: The purpose of the proposed text amendment is to expand the zone districts where electric fences are permitted. The proposed modifications are not consistent with the purpose of the Development Code to promote the growth of the city in an orderly and sustainable manner and promote and protect the public health, safety, peace comfort and general welfare. The modification to permit electric fences in additional zone districts seeks to promote and protect the safety and general welfare of private businesses at the expense of the health and safety of the general public. The allowance of electrified fencing in zone districts that allow residential use or could be located adjacent to residential zone districts is inconsistent with the promotion of orderly growth in a sustainable manner, and the protection of the public health and safety. As such, the proposed text amendment is inconsistent with the purpose of the Mixed-Use Districts, Employment Districts, the Public and Institutional District, and the Downtown Districts Development Code purpose CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission recommended approval with modifications:
• An 18-inch gap is required between the perimeter fence and the electrified fence.
• The Mixed-Use Districts and the Public and Institution Districts shall be removed from permitted locations.
• Electric Fences are not permitted within 500 feet of sensitive use, such as Schools and Childcare Facilities.
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
STAFF RECOMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval with additional modifications:
• The removal of the Commercial Main Street District from permitted locations. • The removal of the Regional Commercial District from permitted locations. • The removal of the Downtown Districts from permitted locations except in locations east of State Route 41 only.
• Permitted in Public and Institutional District when the uses fall under the Transportation, Communication, and Utilities Use Classifications. • Inclusion of residential uses within sensitive uses.
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989
RECOMMENDATION OPTIONS
• Option 1: Denial
• Option 2: Approval
• Include recommended conditions within motion. Subject to alternative findings.
• Option 3: Approval with Conditions
• Include recommended conditions within motion. Subject to alternative findings.
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
JUNE 30, 2022 | ID 22-989