8. Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
9. Railroad Division or Region
None _______________________
10. Railroad Subdivision or District
None _______________________
11. Branch or Line Name
None _______________________
12. RR Milepost
_______|____________|____________
(prefix) | (nnnn.nnn) | (suffix)
13. Line Segment
*
_________________________
14. Nearest RR Timetable
Station *
__________________________
15. Parent RR (if applicable)
N/A _____________________________
16. Crossing Owner (if applicable)
N/A _________________________________
17. Crossing Type
Public
Private
18. Crossing Purpose
Highway
Pathway, Ped.
Station, Ped.
19. Crossing Position
At Grade
RR Under
RR Over
20. Public Access
(if Private Crossing)
Yes
No
21. Type of Train
Freight
Intercity Passenger
Commuter
Transit
Shared Use Transit
Tourist/Other
22. Average Passenger
Train Count Per Day
Less Than One Per Day
Number Per Day_____
23. Type of Land Use
Open Space Farm Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Recreational RR Yard
24. Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? Yes No If Yes, Provide Crossing Number __________________
25. Quiet Zone (FRA provided)
No 24 Hr Partial Chicago Excused Date Established _________________
26. HSR Corridor ID
__________________ N/A
27. Latitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn)
28. Longitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)
29. Lat/Long Source
Actual Estimated
30.A. Railroad Use * 31.A. State Use *
30.B. Railroad Use * 31.B. State Use *
30.C. Railroad Use * 31.C. State Use *
30.D. Railroad Use * 31.D. State Use *
32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) * 32.B. Narrative (State Use) *
33. Emergency Notification Telephone No. (posted)
_________________________________
34. Railroad Contact (Telephone No.)
______________________________________
35. State Contact (Telephone No.)
_________________________________
Part II: Railroad Information
1. Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements
1.A. Total Day Thru Trains
(6 AM to 6 PM)
__________
1.B. Total Night Thru Trains
(6 PM to 6 AM)
__________
1.C. Total Switching Trains
__________
1.D. Total Transit Trains
__________
1.E. Check if Less Than
One Movement Per Day
How many trains per week? ______
2. Year of Train Count Data (YYYY)
__________
3. Speed of Train at Crossing
3.A. Maximum Timetable Speed (mph) __________
3.B. Typical Speed Range Over Crossing (mph) From __________ to __________
4. Type and Count of Tracks
Main __________ Siding __________ Yard __________ Transit __________ Industry __________
5. Train Detection (Main Track only)
Constant Warning Time Motion Detection AFO PTC DC Other None
6. Is Track Signaled?
Yes No
7.A. Event Recorder
Yes No
7.B. Remote Health Monitoring
Yes No
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 1 OF 2 ✘
05 02 2019 ✘
760966M
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP] CALIFORNIA FRESNO HERNDON AVENUE 7 ✘ NA ✘ ✘ NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Fresno Sub 0193.670 ✘
✘ UP ✘
✘
✘
✘
0 ✘
✘ ✘
✘
36.8517145 -119.9456857
✘
800-848-8715 402-544-3721 415-703-3722 0 0 0 0 1
✘
60 2016 30 60 1 0 0 0 0
✘
✘ ✘ ✘
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 2 OF 2 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
A. Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) PAGE 2 D. Crossing Inventory Number (7 char.) Part III: Highway or Pathway Traffic Control Device Information
1. Are there
Signs or Signals?
Yes No
2. Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing
2.A. Crossbuck
Assemblies (count)
2.B. STOP Signs (R1-1)
(count)
2.C. YIELD Signs (R1-2)
(count)
2.D. Advance Warning Signs (Check all that apply; include count) None W10-1 ________ W10-3 ________ W10-11 __________
W10-2 ________ W10-4 ________ W10-12 __________
2.E. Low Ground Clearance Sign
(W10-5)
Yes (count_______)
No
2.F. Pavement Markings 2.G. Channelization
Devices/Medians
2.H. EXEMPT Sign
(R15-3)
Yes
No
2.I. ENS Sign (I-13)
Displayed
Yes
No
Stop Lines
RR Xing Symbols
Dynamic Envelope
None
All Approaches
One Approach
Median
None
2.J. Other MUTCD Signs Yes No 2.K. Private Crossing Signs (if private)
Yes No
2.L. LED Enhanced Signs (List types)
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Count __________
Count __________
Count __________
3. Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing (specify count of each device for all that apply)
3.A. Gate Arms
(count)
Roadway _____
Pedestrian _____
3.B. Gate Configuration 3.C. Cantilevered (or Bridged) Flashing Light Structures (count)
3.D. Mast Mounted Flashing Lights
(count of masts) _________
3.E. Total Count of
Flashing Light Pairs
2 Quad
3 Quad
4 Quad
Full (Barrier)
Resistance
Median Gates
Over Traffic Lane _____
Not Over Traffic Lane _____
Incandescent
LED
Incandescent
Back Lights Included
LED
Side Lights
Included
3.F. Installation Date of Current
Active Warning Devices: (MM/YYYY)
______/___________ Not Required
3.G. Wayside Horn 3.H. Highway Traffic Signals Controlling Crossing
Yes No
3.I. Bells
(count) Yes
No
Installed on (MM/YYYY) ______/__________
3.J. Non-Train Active Warning
Flagging/Flagman Manually Operated Signals Watchman Floodlighting None
3.K. Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices
Count ___________ Specify type ______________________
4.A. Does nearby Hwy
Intersection have
Traffic Signals?
Yes No
4.B. Hwy Traffic Signal
Interconnection
Not Interconnected
For Traffic Signals
For Warning Signs
4.C. Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5. Highway Traffic Pre-Signals Yes No
6. Highway Monitoring Devices
(Check all that apply)
Yes - Photo/Video Recording
Yes – Vehicle Presence Detection
None
Simultaneous
Advance
Storage Distance * ____________
Stop Line Distance * ____________
Part IV: Physical Characteristics
1. Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad One-way Traffic
Two-way Traffic
Number of Lanes _______ Divided Traffic
2. Is Roadway/Pathway
Paved?
Yes No
3. Does Track Run Down a Street?
Yes No
4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street
lights within approx. 50 feet from
nearest rail) Yes No
5. Crossing Surface (on Main Track, multiple types allowed) Installation Date * (MM/YYYY) _______/__________ Width * ______________ Length * _______________ 1 Timber 2 Asphalt 3 Asphalt and Timber 4 Concrete 5 Concrete and Rubber 6 Rubber 7 Metal 8 Unconsolidated 9 Composite 10 Other (specify) ________________________________________________________
6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet?
Yes No If Yes, Approximate Distance (feet) _________________
7. Smallest Crossing Angle
0° – 29° 30° – 59° 60° - 90°
8. Is Commercial Power Available? *
Yes No
Part V: Public Highway Information
1. Highway System
(01) Interstate Highway System
(02) Other Nat Hwy System (NHS)
(03) Federal AID, Not NHS
(08) Non-Federal Aid
2. Functional Classification of Road at Crossing
(0) Rural (1) Urban
(1) Interstate (5) Major Collector
(2) Other Freeways and Expressways
(3) Other Principal Arterial (6) Minor Collector
(4) Minor Arterial (7) Local
3. Is Crossing on State Highway
System?
Yes No
4. Highway Speed Limit
___________ MPH
Posted Statutory
5. Linear Referencing System (LRS Route ID) *
6. LRS Milepost *
7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Year _______ AADT _____________
8. Estimated Percent Trucks
___________________ %
9. Regularly Used by School Buses?
Yes No Average Number per Day ___________
10. Emergency Services Route
Yes No
Submission Information - This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website.
Submitted by __________________________________ Organization _______________________________________ Phone _______________ Date _____________ Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection, including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, MS-25 Washington, DC 20590.
05/02/2019 760966M ✘
0 0
✘
✘ ✘
0 ✘
✘
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ✘ ✘
0 0
✘
0 ✘ ✘ ✘
✘ ✘
✘
1970 1 ✘ 0
U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2130-0017
Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings: For public highway-rail grade crossings, complete the entire inventory Form. For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings (including pedestrian station grade crossings), complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For Private pathway grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings (including pedestrian station crossings), complete the Header, Part I, and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header, Part I Items 1-3, and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields. Note: For private crossings only, Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K. are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk * denotes an optional field.
A. Revision Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)
_____/_____/_________
B. Reporting Agency C. Reason for Update (Select only one) D. DOT Crossing Railroad Transit Change in Inventory Number
Data
New
Crossing
Closed No Train
Traffic
Quiet
Zone Update
State Other Re-Open Date
Change Only
Change in Primary
Operating RR
Admin.
Correction
Part I: Location and Classification Information
1. Primary Operating Railroad
_____________________________________________________
2. State
________________________________
3. County
____________________________________
4. City / Municipality
In
Near __________________________
5. Street/Road Name & Block Number
________________________________| __________________
(Street/Road Name) |* (Block Number)
6. Highway Type & No.
_______________________________________
7. Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
8. Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
9. Railroad Division or Region
None _______________________
10. Railroad Subdivision or District
None _______________________
11. Branch or Line Name
None _______________________
12. RR Milepost
_______|____________|____________
(prefix) | (nnnn.nnn) | (suffix)
13. Line Segment
*
_________________________
14. Nearest RR Timetable
Station *
__________________________
15. Parent RR (if applicable)
N/A _____________________________
16. Crossing Owner (if applicable)
N/A _________________________________
17. Crossing Type
Public
Private
18. Crossing Purpose
Highway
Pathway, Ped.
Station, Ped.
19. Crossing Position
At Grade
RR Under
RR Over
20. Public Access
(if Private Crossing)
Yes
No
21. Type of Train
Freight
Intercity Passenger
Commuter
Transit
Shared Use Transit
Tourist/Other
22. Average Passenger
Train Count Per Day
Less Than One Per Day
Number Per Day_____
23. Type of Land Use
Open Space Farm Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Recreational RR Yard
24. Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? Yes No If Yes, Provide Crossing Number __________________
25. Quiet Zone (FRA provided)
No 24 Hr Partial Chicago Excused Date Established _________________
26. HSR Corridor ID
__________________ N/A
27. Latitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn)
28. Longitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)
29. Lat/Long Source
Actual Estimated
30.A. Railroad Use * 31.A. State Use *
30.B. Railroad Use * 31.B. State Use *
30.C. Railroad Use * 31.C. State Use *
30.D. Railroad Use * 31.D. State Use *
32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) * 32.B. Narrative (State Use) *
33. Emergency Notification Telephone No. (posted)
_________________________________
34. Railroad Contact (Telephone No.)
______________________________________
35. State Contact (Telephone No.)
_________________________________
Part II: Railroad Information
1. Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements
1.A. Total Day Thru Trains
(6 AM to 6 PM)
__________
1.B. Total Night Thru Trains
(6 PM to 6 AM)
__________
1.C. Total Switching Trains
__________
1.D. Total Transit Trains
__________
1.E. Check if Less Than
One Movement Per Day
How many trains per week? ______
2. Year of Train Count Data (YYYY)
__________
3. Speed of Train at Crossing
3.A. Maximum Timetable Speed (mph) __________
3.B. Typical Speed Range Over Crossing (mph) From __________ to __________
4. Type and Count of Tracks
Main __________ Siding __________ Yard __________ Transit __________ Industry __________
5. Train Detection (Main Track only)
Constant Warning Time Motion Detection AFO PTC DC Other None
6. Is Track Signaled?
Yes No
7.A. Event Recorder
Yes No
7.B. Remote Health Monitoring
Yes No
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 1 OF 2 ✘
05 02 2019 ✘
757320T
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP] CALIFORNIA FRESNO FRESNO ✘ West Clinton Avenue NA ✘ ✘ NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Fresno Sub 0201.910 ✘
✘ UP ✘
✘
✘
✘
0 ✘
✘ ✘
✘
36.7720002 -119.8372268
✘
800-848-8715 402-544-3721 415-703-3722 0 0 0 0 1
✘
40 2016 20 40 2 0 1 0 0
✘
✘ ✘ ✘
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 2 OF 2 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
A. Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) PAGE 2 D. Crossing Inventory Number (7 char.) Part III: Highway or Pathway Traffic Control Device Information
1. Are there
Signs or Signals?
Yes No
2. Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing
2.A. Crossbuck
Assemblies (count)
2.B. STOP Signs (R1-1)
(count)
2.C. YIELD Signs (R1-2)
(count)
2.D. Advance Warning Signs (Check all that apply; include count) None W10-1 ________ W10-3 ________ W10-11 __________
W10-2 ________ W10-4 ________ W10-12 __________
2.E. Low Ground Clearance Sign
(W10-5)
Yes (count_______)
No
2.F. Pavement Markings 2.G. Channelization
Devices/Medians
2.H. EXEMPT Sign
(R15-3)
Yes
No
2.I. ENS Sign (I-13)
Displayed
Yes
No
Stop Lines
RR Xing Symbols
Dynamic Envelope
None
All Approaches
One Approach
Median
None
2.J. Other MUTCD Signs Yes No 2.K. Private Crossing Signs (if private)
Yes No
2.L. LED Enhanced Signs (List types)
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Count __________
Count __________
Count __________
3. Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing (specify count of each device for all that apply)
3.A. Gate Arms
(count)
Roadway _____
Pedestrian _____
3.B. Gate Configuration 3.C. Cantilevered (or Bridged) Flashing Light Structures (count)
3.D. Mast Mounted Flashing Lights
(count of masts) _________
3.E. Total Count of
Flashing Light Pairs
2 Quad
3 Quad
4 Quad
Full (Barrier)
Resistance
Median Gates
Over Traffic Lane _____
Not Over Traffic Lane _____
Incandescent
LED
Incandescent
Back Lights Included
LED
Side Lights
Included
3.F. Installation Date of Current
Active Warning Devices: (MM/YYYY)
______/___________ Not Required
3.G. Wayside Horn 3.H. Highway Traffic Signals Controlling Crossing
Yes No
3.I. Bells
(count) Yes
No
Installed on (MM/YYYY) ______/__________
3.J. Non-Train Active Warning
Flagging/Flagman Manually Operated Signals Watchman Floodlighting None
3.K. Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices
Count ___________ Specify type ______________________
4.A. Does nearby Hwy
Intersection have
Traffic Signals?
Yes No
4.B. Hwy Traffic Signal
Interconnection
Not Interconnected
For Traffic Signals
For Warning Signs
4.C. Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5. Highway Traffic Pre-Signals Yes No
6. Highway Monitoring Devices
(Check all that apply)
Yes - Photo/Video Recording
Yes – Vehicle Presence Detection
None
Simultaneous
Advance
Storage Distance * ____________
Stop Line Distance * ____________
Part IV: Physical Characteristics
1. Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad One-way Traffic
Two-way Traffic
Number of Lanes _______ Divided Traffic
2. Is Roadway/Pathway
Paved?
Yes No
3. Does Track Run Down a Street?
Yes No
4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street
lights within approx. 50 feet from
nearest rail) Yes No
5. Crossing Surface (on Main Track, multiple types allowed) Installation Date * (MM/YYYY) _______/__________ Width * ______________ Length * _______________ 1 Timber 2 Asphalt 3 Asphalt and Timber 4 Concrete 5 Concrete and Rubber 6 Rubber 7 Metal 8 Unconsolidated 9 Composite 10 Other (specify) ________________________________________________________
6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet?
Yes No If Yes, Approximate Distance (feet) _________________
7. Smallest Crossing Angle
0° – 29° 30° – 59° 60° - 90°
8. Is Commercial Power Available? *
Yes No
Part V: Public Highway Information
1. Highway System
(01) Interstate Highway System
(02) Other Nat Hwy System (NHS)
(03) Federal AID, Not NHS
(08) Non-Federal Aid
2. Functional Classification of Road at Crossing
(0) Rural (1) Urban
(1) Interstate (5) Major Collector
(2) Other Freeways and Expressways
(3) Other Principal Arterial (6) Minor Collector
(4) Minor Arterial (7) Local
3. Is Crossing on State Highway
System?
Yes No
4. Highway Speed Limit
___________ MPH
Posted Statutory
5. Linear Referencing System (LRS Route ID) *
6. LRS Milepost *
7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Year _______ AADT _____________
8. Estimated Percent Trucks
___________________ %
9. Regularly Used by School Buses?
Yes No Average Number per Day ___________
10. Emergency Services Route
Yes No
Submission Information - This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website.
Submitted by __________________________________ Organization _______________________________________ Phone _______________ Date _____________ Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection, including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, MS-25 Washington, DC 20590.
05/02/2019 757320T ✘
0 0
✘
✘ ✘
0 ✘
✘
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ✘ ✘
0 0
✘
0 ✘ ✘ ✘
✘ ✘
✘
1970 1 ✘ 0
U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2130-0017
Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings: For public highway-rail grade crossings, complete the entire inventory Form. For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings (including pedestrian station grade crossings), complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For Private pathway grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings (including pedestrian station crossings), complete the Header, Part I, and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header, Part I Items 1-3, and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields. Note: For private crossings only, Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K. are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk * denotes an optional field.
A. Revision Date
(MM/DD/YYYY)
_____/_____/_________
B. Reporting Agency C. Reason for Update (Select only one) D. DOT Crossing Railroad Transit Change in Inventory Number
Data
New
Crossing
Closed No Train
Traffic
Quiet
Zone Update
State Other Re-Open Date
Change Only
Change in Primary
Operating RR
Admin.
Correction
Part I: Location and Classification Information
1. Primary Operating Railroad
_____________________________________________________
2. State
________________________________
3. County
____________________________________
4. City / Municipality
In
Near __________________________
5. Street/Road Name & Block Number
________________________________| __________________
(Street/Road Name) |* (Block Number)
6. Highway Type & No.
_______________________________________
7. Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
8. Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing? Yes No If Yes, Specify RR
____________, ____________, ____________, _____________
9. Railroad Division or Region
None _______________________
10. Railroad Subdivision or District
None _______________________
11. Branch or Line Name
None _______________________
12. RR Milepost
_______|____________|____________
(prefix) | (nnnn.nnn) | (suffix)
13. Line Segment
*
_________________________
14. Nearest RR Timetable
Station *
__________________________
15. Parent RR (if applicable)
N/A _____________________________
16. Crossing Owner (if applicable)
N/A _________________________________
17. Crossing Type
Public
Private
18. Crossing Purpose
Highway
Pathway, Ped.
Station, Ped.
19. Crossing Position
At Grade
RR Under
RR Over
20. Public Access
(if Private Crossing)
Yes
No
21. Type of Train
Freight
Intercity Passenger
Commuter
Transit
Shared Use Transit
Tourist/Other
22. Average Passenger
Train Count Per Day
Less Than One Per Day
Number Per Day_____
23. Type of Land Use
Open Space Farm Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Recreational RR Yard
24. Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? Yes No If Yes, Provide Crossing Number __________________
25. Quiet Zone (FRA provided)
No 24 Hr Partial Chicago Excused Date Established _________________
26. HSR Corridor ID
__________________ N/A
27. Latitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn)
28. Longitude in decimal degrees
(WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn)
29. Lat/Long Source
Actual Estimated
30.A. Railroad Use * 31.A. State Use *
30.B. Railroad Use * 31.B. State Use *
30.C. Railroad Use * 31.C. State Use *
30.D. Railroad Use * 31.D. State Use *
32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) * 32.B. Narrative (State Use) *
33. Emergency Notification Telephone No. (posted)
_________________________________
34. Railroad Contact (Telephone No.)
______________________________________
35. State Contact (Telephone No.)
_________________________________
Part II: Railroad Information
1. Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements
1.A. Total Day Thru Trains
(6 AM to 6 PM)
__________
1.B. Total Night Thru Trains
(6 PM to 6 AM)
__________
1.C. Total Switching Trains
__________
1.D. Total Transit Trains
__________
1.E. Check if Less Than
One Movement Per Day
How many trains per week? ______
2. Year of Train Count Data (YYYY)
__________
3. Speed of Train at Crossing
3.A. Maximum Timetable Speed (mph) __________
3.B. Typical Speed Range Over Crossing (mph) From __________ to __________
4. Type and Count of Tracks
Main __________ Siding __________ Yard __________ Transit __________ Industry __________
5. Train Detection (Main Track only)
Constant Warning Time Motion Detection AFO PTC DC Other None
6. Is Track Signaled?
Yes No
7.A. Event Recorder
Yes No
7.B. Remote Health Monitoring
Yes No
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 1 OF 2 ✘
05 02 2019 ✘
753317W
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP] CALIFORNIA FRESNO FRESNO ✘ ASHLAN AVENUE NA ✘ ✘ NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Fresno Sub 0199.950 ✘
✘ UP ✘
✘
✘
✘
0 ✘
✘ ✘
✘
36.7934600 -119.8608629
✘
800-848-8715 402-544-3721 415-703-3722 0 0 0 0 1
✘
40 2016 20 40 2 0 2 0 0
✘
✘ ✘ ✘
FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 2 OF 2 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM
A. Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) PAGE 2 D. Crossing Inventory Number (7 char.) Part III: Highway or Pathway Traffic Control Device Information
1. Are there
Signs or Signals?
Yes No
2. Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing
2.A. Crossbuck
Assemblies (count)
2.B. STOP Signs (R1-1)
(count)
2.C. YIELD Signs (R1-2)
(count)
2.D. Advance Warning Signs (Check all that apply; include count) None W10-1 ________ W10-3 ________ W10-11 __________
W10-2 ________ W10-4 ________ W10-12 __________
2.E. Low Ground Clearance Sign
(W10-5)
Yes (count_______)
No
2.F. Pavement Markings 2.G. Channelization
Devices/Medians
2.H. EXEMPT Sign
(R15-3)
Yes
No
2.I. ENS Sign (I-13)
Displayed
Yes
No
Stop Lines
RR Xing Symbols
Dynamic Envelope
None
All Approaches
One Approach
Median
None
2.J. Other MUTCD Signs Yes No 2.K. Private Crossing Signs (if private)
Yes No
2.L. LED Enhanced Signs (List types)
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Specify Type _______________
Count __________
Count __________
Count __________
3. Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing (specify count of each device for all that apply)
3.A. Gate Arms
(count)
Roadway _____
Pedestrian _____
3.B. Gate Configuration 3.C. Cantilevered (or Bridged) Flashing Light Structures (count)
3.D. Mast Mounted Flashing Lights
(count of masts) _________
3.E. Total Count of
Flashing Light Pairs
2 Quad
3 Quad
4 Quad
Full (Barrier)
Resistance
Median Gates
Over Traffic Lane _____
Not Over Traffic Lane _____
Incandescent
LED
Incandescent
Back Lights Included
LED
Side Lights
Included
3.F. Installation Date of Current
Active Warning Devices: (MM/YYYY)
______/___________ Not Required
3.G. Wayside Horn 3.H. Highway Traffic Signals Controlling Crossing
Yes No
3.I. Bells
(count) Yes
No
Installed on (MM/YYYY) ______/__________
3.J. Non-Train Active Warning
Flagging/Flagman Manually Operated Signals Watchman Floodlighting None
3.K. Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices
Count ___________ Specify type ______________________
4.A. Does nearby Hwy
Intersection have
Traffic Signals?
Yes No
4.B. Hwy Traffic Signal
Interconnection
Not Interconnected
For Traffic Signals
For Warning Signs
4.C. Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5. Highway Traffic Pre-Signals Yes No
6. Highway Monitoring Devices
(Check all that apply)
Yes - Photo/Video Recording
Yes – Vehicle Presence Detection
None
Simultaneous
Advance
Storage Distance * ____________
Stop Line Distance * ____________
Part IV: Physical Characteristics
1. Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad One-way Traffic
Two-way Traffic
Number of Lanes _______ Divided Traffic
2. Is Roadway/Pathway
Paved?
Yes No
3. Does Track Run Down a Street?
Yes No
4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street
lights within approx. 50 feet from
nearest rail) Yes No
5. Crossing Surface (on Main Track, multiple types allowed) Installation Date * (MM/YYYY) _______/__________ Width * ______________ Length * _______________ 1 Timber 2 Asphalt 3 Asphalt and Timber 4 Concrete 5 Concrete and Rubber 6 Rubber 7 Metal 8 Unconsolidated 9 Composite 10 Other (specify) ________________________________________________________
6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet?
Yes No If Yes, Approximate Distance (feet) _________________
7. Smallest Crossing Angle
0° – 29° 30° – 59° 60° - 90°
8. Is Commercial Power Available? *
Yes No
Part V: Public Highway Information
1. Highway System
(01) Interstate Highway System
(02) Other Nat Hwy System (NHS)
(03) Federal AID, Not NHS
(08) Non-Federal Aid
2. Functional Classification of Road at Crossing
(0) Rural (1) Urban
(1) Interstate (5) Major Collector
(2) Other Freeways and Expressways
(3) Other Principal Arterial (6) Minor Collector
(4) Minor Arterial (7) Local
3. Is Crossing on State Highway
System?
Yes No
4. Highway Speed Limit
___________ MPH
Posted Statutory
5. Linear Referencing System (LRS Route ID) *
6. LRS Milepost *
7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Year _______ AADT _____________
8. Estimated Percent Trucks
___________________ %
9. Regularly Used by School Buses?
Yes No Average Number per Day ___________
10. Emergency Services Route
Yes No
Submission Information - This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website.
Submitted by __________________________________ Organization _______________________________________ Phone _______________ Date _____________ Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection, including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, MS-25 Washington, DC 20590.
05/02/2019 753317W ✘
0 0
✘
✘ ✘
0 ✘
✘
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ✘ ✘
0 0
✘
0 ✘ ✘ ✘
✘ ✘
✘
1970 1 ✘ 0
Appendix B:
Noise Measurement Data and Field Sheets
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Observations:
Site Address/Location: Fresno, CA
Date:
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:
Sound Meter: XL2 SN: 08562-E0
Settings: A-weighted, fast, 1-sec, 10-minute duration
Meteorological Con.: Sunny, clear
Site ID: ST-1 thru ST-12
Location Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
1 9:28 AM 9:38 AM 67.6 78.3 54.5 74.7 71.3 68.0 65.6 59.8 2 9:48 AM 9:58 AM 69.5 84.1 40.9 78.3 75.8 69.4 60.4 45.7 3 10:15 AM 10:25 AM 61.5 82.5 41.3 68.1 62.2 58.8 54.2 46.0 4 10:32 AM 10:42 AM 54.4 69.5 37.8 63.1 58.4 53.7 50.0 43.7 5 12:13 PM 12:23 PM 64.6 86.5 45.4 71.6 67.7 64.3 60.8 51.7 6 2:19 PM 2:29 PM 74.8 99.8 50.2 79.2 72.6 67.5 64.3 58.5 7 12:38 PM 12:48 PM 72.8 93.4 37.5 81.4 74.7 65.0 56.2 43.2 8 12:54 PM 1:04 PM 66.1 86.3 51.5 75.5 70.1 62.6 58.9 54.4 9 1:09 PM 1:19 PM 64.4 79.9 48.1 73.5 68.9 63.4 59.5 52.4 10 1:26 PM 1:36 PM 59.6 79.5 31.9 70.4 61.6 52.7 43.8 34.5 11 1:42 PM 1:52 PM 65.8 85.0 44.7 73.4 68.7 64.7 60.4 51.8 12 2:00 PM 2:10 PM 68.8 85.2 55.2 75.9 72.7 69.6 65.6 58.7 6/3/2019
Table 1: Morning - Baseline Noise Measurement Summary
Sunny, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along roads as lited for each measurement.
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR
Site Address/Location: Fresno, CA
Site ID: ST-1 thru ST-12
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
Figure 1: Monitoring Locations 1-12
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8 9
10 11 12
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Herdon Ave. & Parkway Dr. C/L of Herdon Ave. is 30ft from meter Site ID: ST-1 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Parkway Dr. is 50ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-1 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
9:28:20 AM9:28:35 AM9:28:50 AM9:29:05 AM9:29:20 AM9:29:35 AM9:29:50 AM9:30:05 AM9:30:20 AM9:30:35 AM9:30:50 AM9:31:05 AM9:31:20 AM9:31:35 AM9:31:50 AM9:32:05 AM9:32:20 AM9:32:35 AM9:32:50 AM9:33:05 AM9:33:20 AM9:33:35 AM9:33:50 AM9:34:05 AM9:34:20 AM9:34:35 AM9:34:50 AM9:35:05 AM9:35:20 AM9:35:35 AM9:35:50 AM9:36:05 AM9:36:20 AM9:36:35 AM9:36:50 AM9:37:05 AM9:37:20 AM9:37:35 AM9:37:50 AM9:38:05 AM dBA
Time
ST-1: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-1
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 2-2: ST-1 Photo
Figure 2-3: ST-1 Photo
Figure 2-1: ST-1 Site
1 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Bryan Ave. & Shaw Ave. C/L of Bryan Ave is 40ft from meter Site ID: ST-2 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Shaw Ave. is 40ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-2 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
9:48:30 AM9:48:45 AM9:49:00 AM9:49:15 AM9:49:30 AM9:49:45 AM9:50:00 AM9:50:15 AM9:50:30 AM9:50:45 AM9:51:00 AM9:51:15 AM9:51:30 AM9:51:45 AM9:52:00 AM9:52:15 AM9:52:30 AM9:52:45 AM9:53:00 AM9:53:15 AM9:53:30 AM9:53:45 AM9:54:00 AM9:54:15 AM9:54:30 AM9:54:45 AM9:55:00 AM9:55:15 AM9:55:30 AM9:55:45 AM9:56:00 AM9:56:15 AM9:56:30 AM9:56:45 AM9:57:00 AM9:57:15 AM9:57:30 AM9:57:45 AM9:58:00 AM9:58:15 AM dBA
Time
ST-2: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-2
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 3-2: ST-2 Photo
Figure 3-3: ST-2 Photo
Figure 3-1: ST-2 Site
2 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Polk Ave. & Gettysburg Ave. C/L of Polk Ave. is 55ft from meter Site ID: ST-3 Ground Type: Hard site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Gettysburg Ave. is 55ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-3 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
10:15:34 AM10:15:49 AM10:16:04 AM10:16:19 AM10:16:34 AM10:16:49 AM10:17:04 AM10:17:19 AM10:17:34 AM10:17:49 AM10:18:04 AM10:18:19 AM10:18:34 AM10:18:49 AM10:19:04 AM10:19:19 AM10:19:34 AM10:19:49 AM10:20:04 AM10:20:19 AM10:20:34 AM10:20:49 AM10:21:04 AM10:21:19 AM10:21:34 AM10:21:49 AM10:22:04 AM10:22:19 AM10:22:34 AM10:22:49 AM10:23:04 AM10:23:19 AM10:23:34 AM10:23:49 AM10:24:04 AM10:24:19 AM10:24:34 AM10:24:49 AM10:25:04 AM10:25:19 AM dBA
Time
ST-3: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-3
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 4-2: ST-3 Photo
Figure 4-1: ST-3 Site
Figure 4-3: ST-3 Photo
3 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Bryan Ave. & Ashlan Ave. C/L of Bryan Ave. is 45ft from meter Site ID: ST-4 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Ashlan Ave. 50ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-4 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 10:32:36 AM10:32:51 AM10:33:06 AM10:33:21 AM10:33:36 AM10:33:51 AM10:34:06 AM10:34:21 AM10:34:36 AM10:34:51 AM10:35:06 AM10:35:21 AM10:35:36 AM10:35:51 AM10:36:06 AM10:36:21 AM10:36:36 AM10:36:51 AM10:37:06 AM10:37:21 AM10:37:36 AM10:37:51 AM10:38:06 AM10:38:21 AM10:38:36 AM10:38:51 AM10:39:06 AM10:39:21 AM10:39:36 AM10:39:51 AM10:40:06 AM10:40:21 AM10:40:36 AM10:40:51 AM10:41:06 AM10:41:21 AM10:41:36 AM10:41:51 AM10:42:06 AM10:42:21 AM dBA
Time
ST-4: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-4
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 5-1: ST-4 Site
Figure 5-2: ST-4 Photo
Figure 5-3: ST-4 Photo
4 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Polk Ave. & Ashlan Ave. C/L of Polk Ave. is 40ft from meter Site ID: ST-5 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Ashlan Ave. 40ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-5 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
12:13:38 PM12:13:53 PM12:14:08 PM12:14:23 PM12:14:38 PM12:14:53 PM12:15:08 PM12:15:23 PM12:15:38 PM12:15:53 PM12:16:08 PM12:16:23 PM12:16:38 PM12:16:53 PM12:17:08 PM12:17:23 PM12:17:38 PM12:17:53 PM12:18:08 PM12:18:23 PM12:18:38 PM12:18:53 PM12:19:08 PM12:19:23 PM12:19:38 PM12:19:53 PM12:20:08 PM12:20:23 PM12:20:38 PM12:20:53 PM12:21:08 PM12:21:23 PM12:21:38 PM12:21:53 PM12:22:08 PM12:22:23 PM12:22:38 PM12:22:53 PM12:23:08 PM12:23:23 PM dBA
Time
ST-5: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-5
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 6-2: ST-5 Photo
Figure 6-3: ST-5 Photo
Figure 6-1: ST-5 Site
5 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Dakota Ave & Brawley Ave C/L of Dakota Ave is 30ft from meter Site ID: ST-6 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Brawley Ave is 35ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-6 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 20.0
40.0 60.0
80.0 100.0
120.0
2:19:06 PM2:19:21 PM2:19:36 PM2:19:51 PM2:20:06 PM2:20:21 PM2:20:36 PM2:20:51 PM2:21:06 PM2:21:21 PM2:21:36 PM2:21:51 PM2:22:06 PM2:22:21 PM2:22:36 PM2:22:51 PM2:23:06 PM2:23:21 PM2:23:36 PM2:23:51 PM2:24:06 PM2:24:21 PM2:24:36 PM2:24:51 PM2:25:06 PM2:25:21 PM2:25:36 PM2:25:51 PM2:26:06 PM2:26:21 PM2:26:36 PM2:26:51 PM2:27:06 PM2:27:21 PM2:27:36 PM2:27:51 PM2:28:06 PM2:28:21 PM2:28:36 PM2:28:51 PM dBA
Time
ST-6: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-6
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 7-2: ST-6 Photo
Figure 7-3: ST-6 Photo
Figure 7-1: ST-6 Site
6 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Grantlan Ave. & Shields Ave. C/L of Grantlan Ave. is 35ft from meter Site ID: ST-7 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Shields Ave. is 35ft from meter 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-7
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
100.0
12:38:52 PM12:39:07 PM12:39:22 PM12:39:37 PM12:39:52 PM12:40:07 PM12:40:22 PM12:40:37 PM12:40:52 PM12:41:07 PM12:41:22 PM12:41:37 PM12:41:52 PM12:42:07 PM12:42:22 PM12:42:37 PM12:42:52 PM12:43:07 PM12:43:22 PM12:43:37 PM12:43:52 PM12:44:07 PM12:44:22 PM12:44:37 PM12:44:52 PM12:45:07 PM12:45:22 PM12:45:37 PM12:45:52 PM12:46:07 PM12:46:22 PM12:46:37 PM12:46:52 PM12:47:07 PM12:47:22 PM12:47:37 PM12:47:52 PM12:48:07 PM12:48:22 PM12:48:37 PM dBA
Time
ST-4: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-7
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 8-1: ST-7 Site
Figure 8-2: ST-7 Photo
Figure 8-3: ST-7 Photo
7 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Polk Ave. & Shields Ave. C/L of Grantlan Ave. is 35ft from meter Site ID: ST-8 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Shields Ave. is 35ft from meter Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-8 85 Degrees
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
12:54:26 PM12:54:41 PM12:54:56 PM12:55:11 PM12:55:26 PM12:55:41 PM12:55:56 PM12:56:11 PM12:56:26 PM12:56:41 PM12:56:56 PM12:57:11 PM12:57:26 PM12:57:41 PM12:57:56 PM12:58:11 PM12:58:26 PM12:58:41 PM12:58:56 PM12:59:11 PM12:59:26 PM12:59:41 PM12:59:56 PM 1:00:11 PM1:00:26 PM1:00:41 PM1:00:56 PM1:01:11 PM1:01:26 PM1:01:41 PM1:01:56 PM1:02:11 PM1:02:26 PM1:02:41 PM1:02:56 PM1:03:11 PM1:03:26 PM1:03:41 PM1:03:56 PM1:04:11 PM dBA
Time
ST-8: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-8
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 9-1: ST-8 Site
Figure 9-2: ST-8 Photo
Figure 9-3: ST-8 Photo
8 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Blythe Ave. & Shields Ave. C/L of Blythe Ave is 50ft from meter Site ID: ST-9 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Shields Ave. is 45ft from meter 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-9
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
1:09:14 PM1:09:29 PM1:09:44 PM1:09:59 PM1:10:14 PM1:10:29 PM1:10:44 PM1:10:59 PM1:11:14 PM1:11:29 PM1:11:44 PM1:11:59 PM1:12:14 PM1:12:29 PM1:12:44 PM1:12:59 PM1:13:14 PM1:13:29 PM1:13:44 PM1:13:59 PM1:14:14 PM1:14:29 PM1:14:44 PM1:14:59 PM1:15:14 PM1:15:29 PM1:15:44 PM1:15:59 PM1:16:14 PM1:16:29 PM1:16:44 PM1:16:59 PM1:17:14 PM1:17:29 PM1:17:44 PM1:17:59 PM1:18:14 PM1:18:29 PM1:18:44 PM1:18:59 PM dBA
Time
ST-9: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-9
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 10-1: ST-9 Site
Figure 10-2: ST-9 Site
Figure 10-3: ST-9 Site
9 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Clinton Ave. & Bryan Ave. C/L of Clinton Ave. is 15ft from meter Site ID: ST-10 Ground Type: Hard site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Bryan Ave. is 25ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-10 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
1:26:24 PM1:26:39 PM1:26:54 PM1:27:09 PM1:27:24 PM1:27:39 PM1:27:54 PM1:28:09 PM1:28:24 PM1:28:39 PM1:28:54 PM1:29:09 PM1:29:24 PM1:29:39 PM1:29:54 PM1:30:09 PM1:30:24 PM1:30:39 PM1:30:54 PM1:31:09 PM1:31:24 PM1:31:39 PM1:31:54 PM1:32:09 PM1:32:24 PM1:32:39 PM1:32:54 PM1:33:09 PM1:33:24 PM1:33:39 PM1:33:54 PM1:34:09 PM1:34:24 PM1:34:39 PM1:34:54 PM1:35:09 PM1:35:24 PM1:35:39 PM1:35:54 PM1:36:09 PM dBA
Time
ST-10: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-10
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 11-3: ST-10 Site
Figure 11-1: ST-10 Site
Figure 11-2: ST-10 Site
10 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Cornelia Ave. & Clinton Ave. C/L of Cornelia Ave. is 35ft from meter Site ID: ST-11 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Clinton Ave. is 40ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-11 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
1:42:48 PM1:43:03 PM1:43:18 PM1:43:33 PM1:43:48 PM1:44:03 PM1:44:18 PM1:44:33 PM1:44:48 PM1:45:03 PM1:45:18 PM1:45:33 PM1:45:48 PM1:46:03 PM1:46:18 PM1:46:33 PM1:46:48 PM1:47:03 PM1:47:18 PM1:47:33 PM1:47:48 PM1:48:03 PM1:48:18 PM1:48:33 PM1:48:48 PM1:49:03 PM1:49:18 PM1:49:33 PM1:49:48 PM1:50:03 PM1:50:18 PM1:50:33 PM1:50:48 PM1:51:03 PM1:51:18 PM1:51:33 PM1:51:48 PM1:52:03 PM1:52:18 PM1:52:33 PM dBA
Time
ST-11: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-11
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 12-2: ST-11 Photo
Figure 12-3: ST-11 Photo
Figure 12-1: ST-11 Site
11 10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Site Topo: Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Site Address/Location: Clinton Ave. & Marks Ave. C/L of Clinton Ave. is 45ft from meter Site ID: ST-12 Ground Type: Soft site, w/ street surface hard C/L of Marks Ave. 65ft from meter 10-Minute Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - ST-12 85 Degrees
Sunny, clear, 1-3 mph wind
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 90.0
2:00:44 PM2:00:59 PM2:01:14 PM2:01:29 PM2:01:44 PM2:01:59 PM2:02:14 PM2:02:29 PM2:02:44 PM2:02:59 PM2:03:14 PM2:03:29 PM2:03:44 PM2:03:59 PM2:04:14 PM2:04:29 PM2:04:44 PM2:04:59 PM2:05:14 PM2:05:29 PM2:05:44 PM2:05:59 PM2:06:14 PM2:06:29 PM2:06:44 PM2:06:59 PM2:07:14 PM2:07:29 PM2:07:44 PM2:07:59 PM2:08:14 PM2:08:29 PM2:08:44 PM2:08:59 PM2:09:14 PM2:09:29 PM2:09:44 PM2:09:59 PM2:10:14 PM2:10:29 PM dBA
Time
ST-12: Ambient Noise Level (1-sec) ST-12
dBA, Leq
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Figure 13-1: ST-12 Site
Figure 13-2: ST-12 Photo
Figure 13-3: ST-12 Photo 12
10Min_Field Sheet Compare
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR
Site Address/Location: Barstow Ave. & Grantland Ave., Fresno, CA Date: 6/3/2019 to 6/4/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:
Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3713 Site Topo:
Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:
Meteorological Con.: Sunny
Site ID: LT-1
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Barstow Ave. is 35ft from meter
C/L of Grantland Ave. is 230ft from meter
Sunny, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Barstow Ave. and Grantland Ave.
Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-1 Monitoring Location
Site Observations:
Figure 2: LT-1 Photo
1 LTNM1 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Barstow Ave. & Grantland Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-1
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
6/3/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 61.9 83.5 42.9 70.4 65.5 58.4 55.3 52.1 6/3/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 56.9 75.6 36.7 63.5 61.2 57.9 55.3 48.1 6/3/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 59.5 85.7 36.3 66.0 60.7 58.4 53.3 47.6 6/3/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 56.9 79.4 35.2 63.0 60.5 57.2 54.0 47.3 6/3/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 58.1 81.9 35.6 66.2 62.6 57.3 55.3 48.7 6/3/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 59.5 86.2 36.1 66.1 62.0 57.7 55.0 47.8 6/3/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 58.0 82.4 34.7 64.3 61.6 58.1 55.7 50.8 6/3/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 56.8 70.5 39.6 60.7 59.7 57.7 56.1 51.9 6/3/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 59.5 88.2 39.5 63.9 60.8 58.2 56.2 51.6 6/3/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 58.4 71.0 41.0 61.7 60.9 59.7 58.3 53.9 6/3/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 58.0 75.9 42.6 62.3 60.2 59.1 57.1 53.8 6/3/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 56.9 76.1 39.0 62.4 59.8 57.1 55.6 51.2 6/3/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 55.3 70.4 39.3 59.7 59.0 57.0 54.0 50.1 6/3/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 56.1 77.5 42.8 63.3 58.2 56.2 53.8 50.6 6/3/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 53.5 69.1 40.0 58.9 57.7 54.6 50.8 47.9 6/3/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 51.3 72.9 40.1 58.7 53.9 51.3 49.5 46.0 6/4/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 48.0 66.7 37.0 55.2 51.8 48.1 45.3 42.0 6/4/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 48.3 68.9 36.5 54.3 51.5 48.2 46.5 43.4 6/4/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 47.7 66.0 37.0 55.1 52.4 47.2 44.3 41.7 6/4/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 49.6 70.0 36.4 56.7 53.9 49.0 45.7 42.4 6/4/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 52.5 72.7 38.5 61.0 57.0 51.7 48.4 43.9 6/4/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 53.8 73.5 45.8 57.5 57.2 54.7 52.3 49.6 6/4/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 58.0 75.6 45.9 64.1 61.7 58.9 55.9 52.8 6/4/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 58.9 76.4 42.7 62.7 61.6 60.1 58.0 52.5 CNEL: 60.5
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
LTNM1 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Barstow Ave. & Grantland Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-1
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
61.9 56.9
59.5 56.9 58.1
59.5 58.0 56.8
59.5 58.4 58.0 56.9
55.3 56.1
53.5 51.3
48.0 48.3 47.7
49.6 52.5 53.8
58.0 58.9
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
LTNM1 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Barstow Ave. & Grantland Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-1
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
LTNM1 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR
Site Address/Location: Shields Ave. & Valentine Ave., Fresno, CA Date: 6/3/2019 to 6/4/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:
Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3168 Site Topo:
Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:
Meteorological Con.: Sunny
Site ID: LT-2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Valentine Ave. is 35ft from meter
C/L of State Route 99 is 300ft from meter
Sunny, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Valentine Ave and State Route 99.
Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-1 Monitoring Location
Site Observations:
Figure 2: LT-1 Photo 1
LTNM2 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Shields Ave. & Valentine Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-2
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
6/3/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 64.9 75.4 57.1 68.0 67.3 65.8 64.5 62.3 6/3/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 63.9 79.7 56.5 66.8 65.7 64.6 63.5 61.8 6/3/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 62.3 72.8 54.1 64.9 64.1 62.9 61.7 60.1 6/3/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 62.0 74.2 54.2 64.5 63.5 62.9 61.5 60.2 6/3/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 61.3 71.3 52.9 63.1 62.8 62.1 61.2 59.5 6/3/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 62.1 73.5 53.5 64.1 63.6 62.6 61.7 60.1 6/3/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 65.2 93.9 56.5 70.0 64.8 63.4 62.6 61.3 6/3/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 61.9 73.2 53.5 63.8 63.3 62.6 61.6 60.2 6/3/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 63.8 83.8 56.2 68.5 66.1 64.0 62.6 61.3 6/3/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 62.7 82.8 54.4 65.3 63.6 62.9 62.1 60.8 6/3/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 63.1 84.2 55.0 67.9 64.7 63.2 62.4 60.9 6/3/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 62.1 73.8 51.0 64.3 63.9 62.8 62.0 60.3 6/3/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 60.8 72.8 53.4 62.6 62.3 61.4 60.7 59.2 6/3/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 60.9 71.0 52.2 63.6 63.0 61.6 60.7 58.9 6/3/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 59.8 70.6 49.4 62.4 61.2 60.6 59.6 57.5 6/4/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 58.4 69.7 48.6 60.8 60.4 59.5 58.1 56.3 6/4/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 60.2 88.5 48.0 64.7 61.1 58.8 57.9 55.2 6/4/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 59.6 70.0 49.0 63.6 62.3 60.6 58.8 56.0 6/4/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 62.5 75.5 48.8 66.0 65.4 63.3 61.9 59.2 6/4/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 60.9 69.5 52.3 63.9 63.1 62.0 60.3 58.5 6/4/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 67.6 79.0 59.9 70.8 69.6 68.7 67.6 64.5 6/4/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 70.3 85.6 63.3 72.4 71.9 71.4 70.4 67.8 6/4/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 70.2 75.5 65.9 71.6 71.0 70.6 70.1 69.4 6/4/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 70.0 88.8 61.3 72.3 71.2 70.6 69.6 68.1 CNEL: 68.6
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
LTNM2 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Shields Ave. & Valentine Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
64.9 63.9
62.3 62.0 61.3 62.1
65.2 61.9
63.8 62.7 63.1 62.1 60.8 60.9 59.8 58.4
60.2 59.6
62.5 60.9
67.6 70.3 70.2 70.0
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
LTNM2 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Shields Ave. & Valentine Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
LTNM2 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR
Site Address/Location: Blythe Ave. & Ashlan Ave., Fresno, CA Date: 6/4/2019 to 6/5/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:
Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3715 Site Topo:
Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:
Meteorological Con.: Sunny
Site ID: LT-3
Figure 2: LT-3 Photo
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Blythe Ave. is 60ft from meter
C/L of Ashlan Ave. is 90ft from meter
Sunny, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Blythe Ave and Ashlan Ave.
Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-3 Monitoring Location
Site Observations:
1 LTNM3 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Blythe Ave. & Ashlan Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-3
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
6/4/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 63.3 81.8 48.7 68.1 66.0 63.3 62.3 60.6 6/4/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 62.6 76.9 48.7 66.1 64.8 63.1 62.1 60.5 6/4/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 66.7 92.0 48.7 74.5 70.1 63.5 61.8 59.6 6/4/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 65.7 86.5 48.0 75.3 67.0 63.8 62.8 59.8 6/4/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 63.9 81.7 48.2 70.0 65.9 63.7 62.8 60.0 6/4/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 66.5 92.0 50.2 74.8 68.1 64.8 63.6 61.4 6/4/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 74.7 106.8 49.4 73.2 69.3 65.5 63.4 61.3 6/4/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 64.4 79.4 50.1 68.6 67.2 65.0 63.7 62.1 6/4/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 64.3 83.6 49.1 68.9 66.6 64.6 63.6 61.2 6/4/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 64.2 83.0 49.4 69.1 67.0 64.8 63.0 61.2 6/4/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 68.1 96.1 51.3 72.2 67.8 65.3 63.0 60.1 6/4/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 63.4 80.6 50.4 68.2 65.9 63.6 62.6 60.2 6/4/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 63.2 84.0 48.1 69.4 65.6 63.5 61.2 58.7 6/4/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 62.7 89.0 47.4 66.9 64.2 62.0 60.7 57.9 6/4/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 64.7 92.3 46.2 71.7 68.4 62.6 59.7 56.3 6/5/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 59.2 85.5 43.2 65.5 62.0 58.4 56.9 53.1 6/5/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 56.8 80.9 40.5 61.8 60.8 57.2 54.7 49.1 6/5/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 56.6 79.5 41.4 63.3 59.8 57.2 54.1 49.0 6/5/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 57.5 78.9 44.3 61.4 60.7 58.1 56.8 51.8 6/5/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 58.4 80.1 45.1 65.2 61.0 58.7 56.8 51.5 6/5/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 62.7 83.4 48.8 66.1 65.6 63.8 61.5 58.5 6/5/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 64.8 81.2 54.9 68.2 66.7 65.5 64.3 61.4 6/5/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 67.3 90.2 54.7 72.6 67.9 65.6 64.8 63.4 6/5/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 64.7 82.3 54.8 68.4 66.9 64.9 64.2 62.7 CNEL: 70.2
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
LTNM3 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Blythe Ave. & Ashlan Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-3
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
63.3 62.6
66.7 65.7
63.9 66.5
74.7 64.4 64.3 64.2
68.1 63.4 63.2 62.7
64.7 59.2
56.8 56.6 57.5 58.4
62.7 64.8
67.3 64.7
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
LTNM3 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Blythe Ave. & Ashlan Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-3
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
LTNM3 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR
Site Address/Location: Ashlan Ave. & Hayes Ave., Fresno, CA Date: 6/3/2019 to 6/4/2019
Field Tech/Engineer: Mike Dickerson, INCE
General Location:
Sound Meter: LD 831 SN: 3716 Site Topo:
Settings: A-weighted, slow, 1-min, 1-hour interval, 24-hour duration Ground Type:
Meteorological Con.: Sunny
Site ID: LT-4
Figure 2: LT-1 Photo
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet
C/L of Ashlan Ave. is 20ft from meter
C/L of Hayes Ave. is 130ft from meter
Sunny, Ambient noise consisted of traffic along Ashlan Ave and Hayes Ave.
Noise Source(s) w/ Distance:
Flat
Soft site, w/ street surface hard
Figure 1: LT-1 Monitoring Location
Site Observations:
1 LTNM4 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Ashlan Ave. & Hayes Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-4
Date Start Stop Leq Lmax Lmin L2 L8 L25 L50 L90
6/3/2019 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 62.6 84.0 38.0 69.8 66.4 62.6 60.1 56.4 6/3/2019 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 63.2 86.7 35.7 71.7 66.3 62.8 60.5 54.9 6/3/2019 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 62.7 86.6 34.8 69.9 64.5 62.3 60.6 54.6 6/3/2019 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 66.0 94.7 40.4 71.2 69.1 64.3 61.4 57.6 6/3/2019 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 63.6 90.8 37.2 70.0 65.4 62.3 60.5 57.4 6/3/2019 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 65.4 82.0 36.7 71.2 68.9 65.5 63.9 61.5 6/3/2019 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 65.3 85.8 40.5 72.2 68.0 66.1 64.4 59.8 6/3/2019 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 62.9 79.8 39.2 68.8 65.9 63.7 61.8 58.4 6/3/2019 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 65.9 90.7 45.8 74.8 67.2 65.1 62.6 59.7 6/3/2019 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 70.2 99.3 43.2 78.1 68.7 65.0 62.1 58.3 6/3/2019 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 62.9 85.4 39.8 69.4 66.2 62.6 60.3 54.6 6/3/2019 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 61.5 83.9 40.1 67.6 64.4 61.9 59.6 55.3 6/3/2019 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 58.7 78.0 39.6 64.6 63.3 59.4 57.6 46.6 6/3/2019 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 56.1 75.8 39.8 62.1 60.1 57.4 54.5 44.3 6/3/2019 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 63.3 93.6 39.6 63.5 58.7 55.1 48.5 43.2 6/4/2019 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 55.2 82.6 38.0 62.1 59.6 55.1 46.9 41.6 6/4/2019 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 48.3 69.3 36.8 56.6 50.7 46.8 44.4 41.7 6/4/2019 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 50.2 69.4 39.3 57.3 55.6 50.1 44.8 42.8 6/4/2019 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 54.0 75.6 38.7 61.6 59.8 51.1 46.8 44.0 6/4/2019 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 56.4 82.7 41.7 66.4 60.0 55.1 48.5 45.4 6/4/2019 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 58.9 79.4 43.0 66.6 62.6 59.9 56.5 48.3 6/4/2019 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 63.1 81.7 46.3 68.8 67.0 63.6 61.0 55.3 6/4/2019 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 68.3 88.1 46.4 75.0 72.9 68.2 66.3 63.2 6/4/2019 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 65.8 87.6 40.5 70.1 69.5 67.8 64.6 59.5 CNEL: 67.1
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
LTNM4 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Ashlan Ave. & Hayes Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-4
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
62.6 63.2 62.7
66.0 63.6
65.4 65.3
62.9 65.9
70.2 62.9 61.5
58.7 56.1
63.3 55.2
48.3 50.2
54.0 56.4
58.9 63.1
68.3 65.8
0.0 10.0
20.0 30.0
40.0 50.0
60.0 70.0
80.0 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM Leq(h), dBA Time
24Hr - 1Hr Leq & L90 LAeq
L(90)
LTNM4 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
www.mdacoustics.com
AZ Office
4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Ste 1-461
Chandler, AZ 85249
CA Office
1197 E Los Angeles Ave, C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Project: 04621901 Fresno West EIR Day: 1 of 1
Site Address/Location: Ashlan Ave. & Hayes Ave., Fresno, CA Site ID: LT-4
24-Hour Continuous Noise Measurement Datasheet - Cont.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120 dBA (Leq, 1-min)
Time
24 Hr - 1Min Leq & L90
Leq Lmax Lmin
LTNM4 24Hr Field Sheet.xlsx
Appendix C:
FHWA Roadway Noise Worksheets
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Herndon Ave to W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 81,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 8,100 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.9 72.5 71.7 67.6 75.1 75.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 69.1 66.0 64.6 64.2 70.9 71.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.3 74.9 70.7 74.8 81.2 81.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.3 77.2 74.7 75.9 82.4 82.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 695 1497 3225 6948
LDN 675 1453 3131 6745
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 77,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 7,700 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.7 72.3 71.5 67.4 74.9 75.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 68.9 65.8 64.4 64.0 70.7 70.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.1 74.7 70.5 74.6 80.9 81.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.1 77.0 74.5 75.7 82.2 82.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 672 1447 3118 6718
LDN 652 1405 3027 6521
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 105,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 10,500 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.1 73.7 72.8 68.7 76.2 76.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.2 67.1 65.8 65.4 72.0 72.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.5 76.1 71.9 75.9 82.3 82.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.4 78.4 75.8 77.0 83.6 83.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 826 1780 3834 8261
LDN 802 1728 3722 8019
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Sheilds Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 104,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 10,400 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.0 73.6 72.8 68.7 76.2 76.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.2 67.1 65.7 65.3 72.0 72.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.4 76.0 71.8 75.9 82.2 82.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.4 78.3 75.8 77.0 83.5 83.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 821 1768 3810 8208
LDN 797 1717 3698 7968
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 107,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 10,700 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.5 69.2 68.3 64.2 71.7 72.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 67.8 64.7 63.3 63.0 69.6 69.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.1 74.7 70.5 74.5 80.9 81.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.3 76.1 73.0 75.2 81.7 81.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 615 1324 2852 6145
LDN 600 1292 2784 5998
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Herndon Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Garfield Ave to N. Parkway Drive ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 18.3 16.4 14.6 8.8 17.3 17.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 15.2 13.7 10.1 3.6 13.3 13.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 11.9 6.3 15.3 -15.6 8.1 12.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 20.6 18.5 18.7 10.0 19.1 20.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 0
LDN 0 0 0 0
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Bullard Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Garfield Ave to N. Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 60 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 46.1 44.2 42.4 36.6 45.1 45.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 43.0 41.5 37.9 31.4 41.1 41.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 39.7 34.1 43.1 12.2 35.9 39.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 48.4 46.3 46.4 37.8 46.9 47.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 3 7 16 33
LDN 3 6 13 29
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Bullard Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,900 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 290 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.9 51.0 49.2 43.4 51.9 52.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.8 48.3 44.8 38.3 48.0 48.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.5 40.9 50.0 19.0 42.8 46.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.3 53.1 53.3 44.6 53.8 54.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 10 21 44 96
LDN 8 18 38 83
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Bullard Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to SR-99 ENGINEER: M. Dickerson
LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 21.5 19.6 17.8 12.0 20.5 21.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 16.9 15.4 11.9 5.4 15.1 15.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 12.9 7.3 16.4 -14.6 9.2 13.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 23.2 21.2 20.8 12.9 21.8 22.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Garfield to N. Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 120 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.3 50.3 48.6 42.8 51.3 51.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.7 46.2 42.7 36.2 45.9 46.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 43.7 38.1 47.2 16.2 40.0 43.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.0 51.9 51.5 43.7 52.6 53.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 17 37 79
LDN 7 15 32 69
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 80 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 47.3 45.4 43.6 37.9 46.3 46.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 44.2 42.7 39.2 32.7 42.4 42.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 40.9 35.3 44.4 13.4 37.2 41.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 49.7 47.5 47.7 39.0 48.2 49.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 4 9 19 41
LDN 4 8 16 35
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Contessa Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 23.1 21.2 19.4 13.6 22.1 22.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 18.0 16.5 12.9 6.4 16.1 16.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 13.7 8.1 17.1 -13.8 9.9 13.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 24.6 22.6 22.0 14.4 23.3 24.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Contessa Ave to N. Island Waterpark Drive ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 21.6 19.7 17.9 12.1 20.6 21.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 17.0 15.5 12.0 5.5 15.2 15.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 13.0 7.4 16.5 -14.5 9.3 13.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 23.3 21.3 20.9 13.0 22.0 22.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Garfield Ave to N. Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 600 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.0 74.2 71.7 66.8 75.2 75.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.1 69.6 66.1 61.3 70.0 70.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 76.6 75.1 69.5 66.5 75.3 75.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.9 78.3 74.4 70.2 78.9 79.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 415 894 1925 4147
LDN 390 840 1810 3900
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 710 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.8 74.9 72.4 67.5 75.9 76.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.8 70.3 66.8 62.0 70.8 71.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 77.3 75.8 70.2 67.2 76.1 76.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.7 79.0 75.1 71.0 79.6 80.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 464 1000 2154 4640
LDN 436 940 2025 4363
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to 1,300 ft east of N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 8,250 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 825 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 77.4 75.6 73.0 68.2 76.6 77.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 72.5 70.9 67.4 62.7 71.4 71.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.0 76.5 70.9 67.9 76.7 77.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.3 79.7 75.8 71.6 80.2 80.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 513 1105 2380 5128
LDN 482 1039 2238 4822
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,300 ft east of N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 920 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 81.1 79.2 76.7 71.8 80.2 80.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 74.7 73.2 69.7 64.9 73.6 74.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.5 78.0 72.4 69.4 78.2 78.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 83.9 82.2 78.6 74.3 82.9 83.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 771 1661 3578 7708
LDN 722 1557 3354 7225
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to State Route 99 ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,820 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 84.2 82.3 79.8 74.9 83.3 83.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 77.8 76.2 72.7 68.0 76.7 77.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 82.6 81.1 75.5 72.5 81.3 81.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 87.0 85.3 81.7 77.4 86.0 86.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1236 2663 5738 12362
LDN 1159 2496 5378 11587
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,300 ft west of N. Bryan Ave to Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 120 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 49.1 47.2 45.4 39.6 48.1 48.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 46.0 44.5 40.9 34.4 44.1 44.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 42.7 37.1 46.1 15.2 38.9 42.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 51.4 49.3 49.5 40.8 49.9 50.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 5 11 25 53
LDN 5 10 21 46
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 170 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 50.6 48.7 46.9 41.1 49.6 50.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.5 46.0 42.4 35.9 45.7 46.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.2 38.6 47.7 16.7 40.4 44.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.0 50.8 51.0 42.3 51.4 52.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 7 14 31 67
LDN 6 12 27 58
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,950 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 195 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 51.2 49.3 47.5 41.7 50.2 50.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.1 46.6 43.0 36.5 46.2 46.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.8 39.2 48.2 17.3 41.0 44.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.6 51.4 51.6 42.9 52.0 53.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 7 16 34 73
LDN 6 14 29 64
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Barcus ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 120 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.4 50.5 48.7 42.9 51.4 52.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.8 46.3 42.8 36.3 46.0 46.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 43.8 38.2 47.3 16.3 40.1 43.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.1 52.1 51.7 43.8 52.7 53.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 17 37 80
LDN 7 15 33 71
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Garfield to N. Grantland ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 41.6 39.7 37.2 32.3 40.7 41.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 35.2 33.6 30.1 25.4 34.1 34.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 40.0 38.5 32.9 29.9 38.7 39.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 44.4 42.7 39.1 34.8 43.4 43.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 2 4 8 18
LDN 2 4 8 17
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,200 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 320 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.5 74.6 72.1 67.2 75.6 76.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.1 68.6 65.1 60.3 69.0 69.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 74.9 73.4 67.8 64.8 73.6 73.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.3 77.7 74.1 69.7 78.3 78.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 381 821 1769 3812
LDN 357 770 1659 3573
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 205 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.4 69.5 67.0 62.1 70.5 71.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 66.4 64.9 61.4 56.6 65.4 65.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 71.9 70.4 64.8 61.8 70.7 71.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 75.3 73.6 69.7 65.6 74.2 74.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 203 437 941 2027
LDN 191 411 885 1906
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 310 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 73.2 71.3 68.8 63.9 72.3 72.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 68.2 66.7 63.2 58.4 67.2 67.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 73.7 72.2 66.6 63.6 72.5 72.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 77.1 75.4 71.5 67.4 76.0 76.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 267 575 1239 2670
LDN 251 541 1165 2511
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,500 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 650 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.4 74.5 72.0 67.1 75.5 76.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.5 69.9 66.4 61.6 70.4 70.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 76.9 75.5 69.9 66.8 75.7 76.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.3 78.7 74.8 70.6 79.2 79.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 437 942 2031 4375
LDN 411 886 1909 4113
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,350 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,635 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 80.4 78.5 76.0 71.1 79.5 80.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 75.5 73.9 70.4 65.6 74.4 74.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 80.9 79.5 73.9 70.9 79.7 80.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 84.3 82.7 78.8 74.6 83.2 83.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 809 1743 3756 8091
LDN 761 1639 3531 7608
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to State Route 99 ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 23,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,360 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 82.0 80.1 77.6 72.7 81.1 81.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 77.1 75.5 72.0 67.2 76.0 76.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 82.5 81.1 75.5 72.4 81.3 81.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 85.9 84.3 80.4 76.2 84.8 85.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1033 2226 4797 10334
LDN 972 2093 4510 9717
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Barcus Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,950 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 195 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 51.2 49.3 47.5 41.7 50.2 50.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.1 46.6 43.0 36.5 46.2 46.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.8 39.2 48.2 17.3 41.0 44.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.6 51.4 51.6 42.9 52.0 53.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 7 16 34 73
LDN 6 14 29 64
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Barcus Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,950 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 195 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.4 52.5 50.7 44.9 53.4 54.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.8 48.3 44.8 38.3 48.0 48.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.8 40.2 49.3 18.3 42.1 45.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.1 54.1 53.7 45.8 54.7 55.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 11 24 51 109
LDN 10 21 45 96
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 510 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.4 53.5 51.7 45.9 54.4 55.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.3 50.7 47.2 40.7 50.4 51.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.0 43.3 52.4 21.5 45.2 49.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.7 55.6 55.7 47.1 56.2 57.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 14 30 65 139
LDN 12 26 56 121
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,250 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 425 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.6 52.7 50.9 45.1 53.6 54.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.5 50.0 46.4 39.9 49.6 50.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.2 42.6 51.6 20.7 44.4 48.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.9 54.8 54.9 46.3 55.4 56.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 12 27 57 123
LDN 11 23 50 107
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to N Brawley Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,150 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 315 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 53.3 51.4 49.6 43.8 52.3 52.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.2 48.7 45.1 38.6 48.3 48.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.9 41.3 50.3 19.4 43.1 47.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.6 53.5 53.6 45.0 54.1 55.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 10 22 47 101
LDN 9 19 41 87
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Brawley Ave to N. Parkway Drive ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 240 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.1 50.2 48.4 42.6 51.1 51.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.0 47.5 43.9 37.4 47.2 47.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.7 40.1 49.2 18.2 41.9 45.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.5 52.3 52.5 43.8 52.9 53.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 18 39 84
LDN 7 16 34 73
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Garfield Ave to Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 270 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.6 50.7 48.9 43.1 51.6 52.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.5 48.0 44.4 38.0 47.7 48.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.2 40.6 49.7 18.7 42.4 46.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.0 52.8 53.0 44.3 53.5 54.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 9 20 42 91
LDN 8 17 37 79
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 275 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.7 50.8 49.0 43.2 51.7 52.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.6 48.1 44.5 38.0 47.7 48.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.3 40.7 49.7 18.8 42.5 46.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.0 52.9 53.1 44.4 53.5 54.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 9 20 43 92
LDN 8 17 37 80
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,550 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 355 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 53.8 51.9 50.1 44.3 52.8 53.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.7 49.2 45.6 39.1 48.9 49.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.4 41.8 50.9 19.9 43.6 47.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.2 54.0 54.2 45.5 54.6 55.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 11 24 51 109
LDN 9 20 44 95
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,250 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 325 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 53.4 51.5 49.7 43.9 52.4 53.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.3 48.8 45.2 38.8 48.5 49.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.0 41.4 50.5 19.5 43.3 47.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.8 53.6 53.8 45.1 54.3 55.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 10 22 48 103
LDN 9 19 41 89
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Dante Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 375 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 57.2 55.3 53.5 47.7 56.2 56.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.7 51.2 47.6 41.1 50.8 51.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.7 43.1 52.1 21.2 44.9 48.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.0 56.9 56.5 48.6 57.6 58.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 36 78 169
LDN 15 32 69 149
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Dante Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 375 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 57.2 55.3 53.5 47.7 56.2 56.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.7 51.2 47.6 41.1 50.8 51.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.7 43.1 52.1 21.2 44.9 48.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.0 56.9 56.5 48.6 57.6 58.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 36 78 169
LDN 15 32 69 149
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 460 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.9 53.0 51.2 45.5 53.9 54.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.8 50.3 46.8 40.3 50.0 50.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.5 42.9 52.0 21.0 44.8 48.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.3 55.1 55.3 46.6 55.8 56.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 13 28 60 130
LDN 11 24 52 113
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to N. Brawley Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 440 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.7 52.8 51.0 45.3 53.8 54.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.6 50.1 46.6 40.1 49.8 50.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.3 42.7 51.8 20.8 44.6 48.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.1 54.9 55.1 46.4 55.6 56.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 13 27 59 126
LDN 11 24 51 109
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Brawley Ave to N. Valentine Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 580 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.9 54.0 52.2 46.5 55.0 55.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.8 51.3 47.8 41.3 51.0 51.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.5 43.9 53.0 22.0 45.8 49.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.3 56.1 56.3 47.6 56.8 57.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 15 33 70 152
LDN 13 28 61 131
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Valentine Ave to N. Marks Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,900 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 690 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.7 54.8 53.0 47.2 55.7 56.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.6 52.1 48.5 42.0 51.7 52.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.3 44.7 53.7 22.8 46.5 50.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.0 56.9 57.0 48.4 57.5 58.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 37 79 170
LDN 15 32 68 147
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 40 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.3 62.4 59.9 55.0 63.4 63.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.3 57.8 54.3 49.5 58.3 58.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.8 63.3 57.7 54.7 63.6 63.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.2 66.5 62.6 58.5 67.1 67.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 68 147 317 682
LDN 64 138 298 641
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 70 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.7 64.9 62.3 57.5 65.8 66.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.8 60.2 56.7 52.0 60.7 61.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 67.3 65.8 60.2 57.2 66.0 66.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.6 69.0 65.1 60.9 69.5 69.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 99 213 460 990
LDN 93 201 432 931
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 105 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.5 66.6 64.1 59.2 67.6 68.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.5 62.0 58.5 53.7 62.5 62.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.0 67.5 61.9 58.9 67.8 68.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.4 70.7 66.8 62.7 71.3 71.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 130 280 602 1298
LDN 122 263 566 1220
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to 1900 ft east of N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 105 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.5 66.6 64.1 59.2 67.6 68.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.5 62.0 58.5 53.7 62.5 62.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.0 67.5 61.9 58.9 67.8 68.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 72.4 70.7 66.8 62.7 71.3 71.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 130 280 602 1298
LDN 122 263 566 1220
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1900 east of N. Polk Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 340 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.8 74.9 72.4 67.5 75.9 76.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.4 68.8 65.3 60.6 69.3 69.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 75.2 73.7 68.1 65.1 73.9 74.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.6 77.9 74.3 70.0 78.6 79.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 397 855 1842 3969
LDN 372 802 1727 3721
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Milburn Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 640 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 81.1 79.3 76.8 71.9 80.3 80.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 74.2 72.6 69.1 64.3 73.1 73.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.7 77.2 71.6 68.6 77.4 77.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 83.6 81.9 78.4 74.0 82.6 83.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 738 1591 3427 7383
LDN 691 1489 3208 6912
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Milburn Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 640 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 79.6 77.8 75.2 70.4 78.7 79.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 73.2 71.7 68.2 63.4 72.2 72.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.0 76.5 70.9 67.9 76.8 77.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 82.5 80.8 77.2 72.9 81.4 81.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 616 1327 2859 6159
LDN 577 1244 2679 5773
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to N Sonora Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 930 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 82.8 80.9 78.4 73.5 81.9 82.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 75.8 74.2 70.7 66.0 74.7 75.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 80.3 78.8 73.2 70.2 79.0 79.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 85.2 83.5 80.1 75.7 84.2 84.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 947 2041 4397 9472
LDN 887 1911 4116 8868
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Sonora Ave to N Brawley Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 930 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 81.2 79.4 76.8 72.0 80.4 80.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 74.9 73.3 69.8 65.0 73.8 74.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.6 78.2 72.6 69.6 78.4 78.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 84.1 82.4 78.8 74.5 83.0 83.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 790 1702 3667 7901
LDN 741 1596 3438 7406
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Brawley Ave to N. Knoll Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,850 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 985 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 81.5 79.6 77.1 72.2 80.6 81.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 75.1 73.6 70.1 65.3 74.0 74.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.9 78.4 72.8 69.8 78.6 78.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 84.3 82.7 79.1 74.7 83.3 83.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 821 1769 3811 8210
LDN 770 1658 3572 7695
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Knoll Ave to 850 ft east of N. Knoll Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,850 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 985 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 81.4 79.5 77.0 72.1 80.5 81.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 75.0 73.4 69.9 65.2 73.9 74.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.8 78.3 72.7 69.7 78.5 78.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 84.2 82.5 78.9 74.6 83.2 83.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 807 1738 3744 8067
LDN 756 1629 3510 7561
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT 850 east of N. Knoll Ave to N. Valentine Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,850 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 985 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 78.2 76.3 73.8 68.9 77.3 77.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 73.3 71.7 68.2 63.4 72.2 72.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.7 77.3 71.7 68.7 77.5 77.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 82.1 80.5 76.6 72.4 81.0 81.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 577 1243 2679 5772
LDN 543 1169 2519 5427
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Valentine Ave to N. Marks Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,130 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 82.0 80.1 77.6 72.7 81.1 81.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 75.6 74.0 70.5 65.8 74.5 75.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 80.4 78.9 73.3 70.3 79.1 79.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 84.8 83.1 79.5 75.2 83.8 84.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 884 1905 4103 8840
LDN 829 1785 3846 8286
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Marks Ave to W. Vassar Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 20,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,000 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 86.1 84.2 81.7 76.8 85.2 85.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 79.1 77.6 74.1 69.3 78.0 78.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 83.6 82.1 76.5 73.5 82.3 82.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 88.6 86.9 83.4 79.0 87.5 88.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1578 3400 7325 15782
LDN 1477 3183 6858 14774
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Herndon Ave to W. Bullard Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 38.3 36.4 33.9 29.0 37.4 37.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 33.3 31.8 28.3 23.5 32.2 32.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 38.8 37.3 31.7 28.7 37.5 37.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 42.2 40.5 36.6 32.5 41.1 41.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1 3 6 13
LDN 1 3 5 12
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Bullard Ave to W. Barstow Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 38.3 36.4 33.9 29.0 37.4 37.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 33.3 31.8 28.3 23.5 32.2 32.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 38.8 37.3 31.7 28.7 37.5 37.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 42.2 40.5 36.6 32.5 41.1 41.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1 3 6 13
LDN 1 3 5 12
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Barstow Ave to 1,000 ft south of W. Barston Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 41.4 39.6 37.0 32.2 40.6 41.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 35.1 33.5 30.0 25.2 34.0 34.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 39.8 38.4 32.8 29.8 38.6 38.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 44.3 42.6 39.0 34.7 43.2 43.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 2 4 8 18
LDN 2 4 8 16
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,000 ft south of W. Barstow Ave to W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 41.4 39.6 37.0 32.2 40.6 41.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 35.1 33.5 30.0 25.2 34.0 34.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 39.8 38.4 32.8 29.8 38.6 38.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 44.3 42.6 39.0 34.7 43.2 43.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 2 4 8 18
LDN 2 4 8 16
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 38.3 36.4 33.9 29.0 37.4 37.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 33.3 31.8 28.3 23.5 32.2 32.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 38.8 37.3 31.7 28.7 37.5 37.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 42.2 40.5 36.6 32.5 41.1 41.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1 3 6 13
LDN 1 3 5 12
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,381 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 538 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.6 73.7 71.2 66.3 74.7 75.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.6 69.1 65.6 60.8 69.6 70.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 76.1 74.6 69.0 66.0 74.8 75.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.5 77.8 73.9 69.8 78.4 78.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 386 831 1790 3857
LDN 363 781 1683 3626
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 38.3 36.4 33.9 29.0 37.4 37.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 33.3 31.8 28.3 23.5 32.2 32.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 38.8 37.3 31.7 28.7 37.5 37.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 42.2 40.5 36.6 32.5 41.1 41.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1 3 6 13
LDN 1 3 5 12
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Sheilds Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,998 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 500 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.2 73.4 70.9 66.0 74.4 74.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.3 68.8 65.3 60.5 69.2 69.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 75.8 74.3 68.7 65.7 74.5 74.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.1 77.5 73.6 69.5 78.1 78.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 367 791 1704 3672
LDN 345 744 1602 3452
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Parkway Drive DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Herndon Ave to W. Herndon Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 38.3 36.4 33.9 29.0 37.4 37.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 33.3 31.8 28.3 23.5 32.2 32.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 38.8 37.3 31.7 28.7 37.5 37.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 42.2 40.5 36.6 32.5 41.1 41.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 1 3 6 13
LDN 1 3 5 12
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W. Bullard Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 18.3 16.4 14.6 8.8 17.3 17.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 15.2 13.7 10.1 3.6 13.3 13.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 11.9 6.3 15.3 -15.6 8.1 12.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 20.6 18.5 18.7 10.0 19.1 20.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 0
LDN 0 0 0 0
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Bullard Ave to W. Barstow Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 41.4 39.6 37.0 32.2 40.6 41.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 35.1 33.5 30.0 25.2 34.0 34.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 39.8 38.4 32.8 29.8 38.6 38.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 44.3 42.6 39.0 34.7 43.2 43.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 2 4 8 18
LDN 2 4 8 16
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Barstow Ave to W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 670 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 79.7 77.9 75.3 70.5 78.8 79.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 73.3 71.8 68.3 63.5 72.2 72.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.1 76.6 71.0 68.0 76.8 77.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 82.5 80.9 77.3 72.9 81.5 81.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 624 1344 2896 6239
LDN 585 1260 2715 5848
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,900 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 390 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.2 72.3 69.8 64.9 73.3 73.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 69.2 67.7 64.2 59.4 68.2 68.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 74.7 73.2 67.6 64.6 73.5 73.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 78.1 76.4 72.5 68.4 77.0 77.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 311 670 1444 3112
LDN 293 630 1358 2926
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 400 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 77.5 75.6 73.1 68.2 76.6 77.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.1 69.5 66.0 61.3 70.0 70.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 75.9 74.4 68.8 65.8 74.6 74.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.3 78.6 75.0 70.7 79.3 79.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 442 953 2053 4424
LDN 415 893 1925 4146
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,050 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 305 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.3 74.4 71.9 67.0 75.4 75.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 69.9 68.4 64.9 60.1 68.8 69.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 74.7 73.2 67.6 64.6 73.4 73.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.1 77.4 73.9 69.5 78.1 78.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 369 795 1714 3692
LDN 346 746 1606 3461
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Sheilds Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 41.4 39.6 37.0 32.2 40.6 41.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 35.1 33.5 30.0 25.2 34.0 34.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 39.8 38.4 32.8 29.8 38.6 38.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 44.3 42.6 39.0 34.7 43.2 43.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 2 4 8 18
LDN 2 4 8 16
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 230 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.1 73.2 70.7 65.8 74.2 74.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 68.7 67.1 63.6 58.9 67.6 68.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 73.5 72.0 66.4 63.4 72.2 72.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 77.9 76.2 72.6 68.3 76.9 77.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 306 659 1420 3059
LDN 287 618 1331 2867
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Santa Ana Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 240 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.1 50.2 48.4 42.6 51.1 51.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.0 47.5 43.9 37.4 47.2 47.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.7 40.1 49.2 18.2 41.9 45.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.5 52.3 52.5 43.8 52.9 53.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 18 39 84
LDN 7 16 34 73
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Santa Ana Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 240 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.1 50.2 48.4 42.6 51.1 51.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.0 47.5 43.9 37.4 47.2 47.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.7 40.1 49.2 18.2 41.9 45.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.5 52.3 52.5 43.8 52.9 53.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 18 39 84
LDN 7 16 34 73
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 310 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.4 54.5 52.7 46.9 55.4 56.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.8 50.3 46.8 40.3 50.0 50.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.8 42.2 51.3 20.3 44.1 47.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.1 56.1 55.7 47.8 56.8 57.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 15 32 69 149
LDN 13 28 61 131
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 175 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 53.9 52.0 50.2 44.4 52.9 53.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.4 47.8 44.3 37.8 47.5 48.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.3 39.7 48.8 17.8 41.6 45.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.6 53.6 53.2 45.3 54.3 55.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 10 22 47 102
LDN 9 19 41 89
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 175 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 50.7 48.8 47.0 41.3 49.7 50.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.6 46.1 42.6 36.1 45.8 46.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.3 38.7 47.8 16.8 40.6 44.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.1 50.9 51.1 42.4 51.6 52.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 7 15 32 68
LDN 6 13 27 59
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 65 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 46.4 44.5 42.7 37.0 45.4 46.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 43.3 41.8 38.3 31.8 41.5 42.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 40.0 34.4 43.5 12.5 36.3 40.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 48.8 46.6 46.8 38.1 47.3 48.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 4 8 16 35
LDN 3 7 14 31
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Santa Ana Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 270 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.9 54.0 52.2 46.4 54.9 55.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.4 49.8 46.3 39.8 49.5 50.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.3 41.7 50.8 19.8 43.6 47.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.6 55.6 55.2 47.3 56.3 57.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 14 30 64 138
LDN 12 26 56 121
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Santa Ana Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 270 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.8 53.9 52.1 46.3 54.8 55.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 51.2 49.7 46.2 39.7 49.4 49.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 47.2 41.6 50.7 19.7 43.5 47.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.5 55.5 55.1 47.2 56.2 57.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 14 29 63 136
LDN 12 26 55 119
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Swift Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 170 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 53.8 51.9 50.1 44.3 52.8 53.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.2 47.7 44.2 37.7 47.4 47.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.2 39.6 48.7 17.7 41.5 45.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 55.5 53.5 53.1 45.2 54.1 55.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 10 21 46 100
LDN 9 19 41 88
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Swift Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 170 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 50.6 48.7 46.9 41.1 49.6 50.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.5 46.0 42.4 35.9 45.7 46.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.2 38.6 47.7 16.7 40.4 44.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.0 50.8 51.0 42.3 51.4 52.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 7 14 31 67
LDN 6 12 27 58
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashland Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 240 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.1 50.2 48.4 42.6 51.1 51.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.0 47.5 43.9 37.4 47.2 47.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.7 40.1 49.2 18.2 41.9 45.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.5 52.3 52.5 43.8 52.9 53.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 18 39 84
LDN 7 16 34 73
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to 1,300 ft South of W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,150 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 215 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 51.6 49.7 47.9 42.1 50.6 51.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.5 47.0 43.5 37.0 46.7 47.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.2 39.6 48.7 17.7 41.5 45.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.0 51.8 52.0 43.3 52.5 53.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 17 36 78
LDN 7 15 31 68
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,300 ft South of W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,150 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 215 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.8 52.9 51.1 45.3 53.8 54.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.3 48.7 45.2 38.7 48.4 48.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 46.2 40.6 49.7 18.7 42.5 46.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.5 54.5 54.1 46.2 55.2 56.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 12 25 54 116
LDN 10 22 48 103
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,650 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 165 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 50.5 48.6 46.8 41.0 49.5 50.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.4 45.8 42.3 35.8 45.5 46.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.1 38.4 47.5 16.6 40.3 44.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 52.8 50.7 50.8 42.2 51.3 52.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 7 14 30 66
LDN 6 12 26 57
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT North of W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson
LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,400 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 440 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 77.9 76.0 73.5 68.6 77.0 77.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.5 69.9 66.4 61.7 70.4 70.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 76.3 74.8 69.2 66.2 75.0 75.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.7 79.0 75.4 71.1 79.7 80.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 471 1016 2188 4714
LDN 442 952 2051 4419
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Acacia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 730 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 80.1 78.2 75.7 70.8 79.2 79.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 73.7 72.1 68.6 63.9 72.6 73.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.5 77.0 71.4 68.4 77.2 77.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 82.9 81.2 77.6 73.3 81.9 82.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 661 1423 3066 6606
LDN 619 1334 2874 6192
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Acaia Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,300 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 730 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 80.2 78.3 75.8 70.9 79.3 79.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 73.8 72.3 68.8 64.0 72.7 73.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.6 77.1 71.5 68.5 77.3 77.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 83.0 81.3 77.8 73.4 82.0 82.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 672 1448 3121 6723
LDN 630 1358 2925 6302
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,850 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 485 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.1 73.3 70.7 65.9 74.2 74.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.2 68.6 65.1 60.4 69.1 69.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 75.7 74.2 68.6 65.6 74.4 74.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.0 77.4 73.5 69.3 77.9 78.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 360 775 1670 3599
LDN 338 729 1571 3384
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashland Ave to W. Griffith Way ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 560 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.7 73.9 71.4 66.5 74.9 75.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.8 69.3 65.8 61.0 69.7 70.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 76.3 74.8 69.2 66.2 75.0 75.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.6 78.0 74.1 69.9 78.6 79.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 396 853 1838 3961
LDN 372 802 1729 3724
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Griffith Way to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 560 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 78.9 77.1 74.5 69.7 78.0 78.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 72.5 71.0 67.5 62.7 71.5 71.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 77.3 75.8 70.2 67.2 76.1 76.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.8 80.1 76.5 72.2 80.7 81.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 554 1193 2570 5536
LDN 519 1118 2409 5189
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,900 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 490 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 75.2 73.3 70.8 65.9 74.3 74.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.2 68.7 65.2 60.4 69.1 69.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 75.7 74.2 68.6 65.6 74.4 74.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 79.1 77.4 73.5 69.4 78.0 78.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 362 781 1682 3624
LDN 341 734 1581 3407
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 3,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 375 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.0 72.2 69.6 64.8 73.1 73.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 69.1 67.5 64.0 59.2 68.0 68.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 74.5 73.1 67.5 64.5 73.3 73.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 77.9 76.3 72.4 68.2 76.8 77.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 303 653 1407 3032
LDN 285 614 1323 2851
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 570 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.0 57.1 55.3 49.6 58.1 58.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.5 53.0 49.4 42.9 52.6 53.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.5 44.9 53.9 23.0 46.7 50.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.8 58.7 58.3 50.4 59.4 60.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 22 48 104 223
LDN 20 42 91 196
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 570 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.0 57.1 55.3 49.6 58.1 58.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.5 53.0 49.4 42.9 52.6 53.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.5 44.9 53.9 23.0 46.7 50.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.8 58.7 58.3 50.4 59.4 60.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 22 48 104 223
LDN 20 42 91 196
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashland Ave to W. Bellaire Way ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 780 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.4 58.5 56.7 50.9 59.4 60.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.9 54.3 50.8 44.3 54.0 54.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.8 46.2 55.3 24.3 48.1 51.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.1 60.1 59.7 51.8 60.8 61.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 27 59 128 275
LDN 24 52 112 242
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Bellaire Way to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 780 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.4 58.5 56.7 50.9 59.4 60.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.9 54.3 50.8 44.3 54.0 54.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.8 46.2 55.3 24.3 48.1 51.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.1 60.1 59.7 51.8 60.8 61.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 27 59 128 275
LDN 24 52 112 242
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,800 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 580 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.9 54.0 52.2 46.5 55.0 55.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.8 51.3 47.8 41.3 51.0 51.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.5 43.9 53.0 22.0 45.8 49.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.3 56.1 56.3 47.6 56.8 57.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 15 33 70 152
LDN 13 28 61 131
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 560 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.0 57.0 55.3 49.5 58.0 58.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.4 52.9 49.4 42.9 52.6 53.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.4 44.8 53.9 22.9 46.7 50.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.7 58.6 58.2 50.3 59.3 60.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 22 47 102 220
LDN 19 42 90 194
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Blythe Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 670 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 93.400 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 3.200 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 3.400 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.5 74.7 72.1 67.3 75.6 76.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 71.6 70.0 66.5 61.8 70.5 71.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 77.1 75.6 70.0 67.0 75.8 76.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.4 78.8 74.9 70.7 79.3 79.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 446 962 2072 4464
LDN 420 904 1948 4197
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Blythe Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,750 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 475 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.1 53.1 51.4 45.6 54.1 54.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.0 50.4 46.9 40.4 50.1 50.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.6 43.0 52.1 21.1 44.9 48.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.4 55.3 55.4 46.8 55.9 56.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 13 29 62 133
LDN 11 25 53 115
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Blythe Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,900 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 490 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.2 53.3 51.5 45.7 54.2 54.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.1 50.6 47.0 40.5 50.3 50.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 48.8 43.2 52.3 21.3 45.0 48.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 57.6 55.4 55.6 46.9 56.0 57.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 14 29 63 136
LDN 12 25 54 117
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 660 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.5 54.6 52.8 47.0 55.5 56.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.4 51.9 48.3 41.8 51.5 52.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.1 44.5 53.5 22.6 46.3 50.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.8 56.7 56.9 48.2 57.3 58.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 36 77 165
LDN 14 31 66 143
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Dayton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,350 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 101
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 101 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 635 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 100.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 100.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 100.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.3 54.3 52.6 46.8 55.3 55.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.2 51.6 48.1 41.6 51.3 51.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.8 44.2 53.3 22.3 46.1 49.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.6 56.5 56.6 48.0 57.1 58.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 16 35 75 161
LDN 14 30 65 140
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dayton Ave to W. Cortland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,350 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 102
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 102 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 635 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 101.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 101.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 101.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.4 57.5 55.7 49.9 58.4 59.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.8 53.3 49.8 43.3 53.0 53.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.8 45.2 54.3 23.3 47.1 50.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.1 59.1 58.6 50.8 59.7 60.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 24 52 111 240
LDN 21 45 98 211
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Cortland Ave to W. Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,350 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 103
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 103 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 635 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 102.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 102.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 102.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.1 54.2 52.4 46.7 55.2 55.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.0 51.5 48.0 41.5 51.2 51.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.7 44.1 53.2 22.2 46.0 49.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.5 56.3 56.5 47.8 57.0 57.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 16 35 75 161
LDN 14 30 65 139
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 104
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 104 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 600 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 103.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 103.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 103.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.8 53.9 52.1 46.4 54.8 55.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.7 51.2 47.7 41.2 50.9 51.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 49.4 43.8 52.9 21.9 45.7 49.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.2 56.0 56.2 47.5 56.7 57.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 16 33 72 155
LDN 13 29 62 134
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Valentine Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,600 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 105
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 105 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 260 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 104.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 104.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 104.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.1 50.2 48.4 42.7 51.1 51.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.0 47.5 44.0 37.5 47.2 47.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 45.7 40.1 49.2 18.2 42.0 45.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.5 52.3 52.5 43.8 53.0 53.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 9 19 41 89
LDN 8 17 36 77
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Valentine Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 106
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 106 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 210 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 105.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 105.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 105.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 51.1 49.2 47.4 41.7 50.2 50.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.0 46.5 43.0 36.5 46.2 46.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.7 39.1 48.2 17.2 41.0 44.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 53.5 51.4 51.5 42.8 52.0 52.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 17 36 77
LDN 7 14 31 67
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Marks Ave DATE: 9-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Princeton Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,100 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 107
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 107 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 910 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 106.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 106.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 106.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 57.5 55.5 53.8 48.0 56.5 57.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.3 52.8 49.3 42.8 52.5 53.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.0 45.4 54.5 23.5 47.3 51.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.8 57.7 57.8 49.1 58.3 59.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 20 44 95 205
LDN 18 38 82 177
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Herndon Ave to W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 81,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 8,100 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.9 72.5 71.7 67.6 75.1 75.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 69.1 66.0 64.6 64.2 70.9 71.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.3 74.9 70.7 74.8 81.2 81.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.3 77.2 74.7 75.9 82.4 82.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 695 1497 3225 6948
LDN 675 1453 3131 6745
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 77,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 7,700 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 74.7 72.3 71.5 67.4 74.9 75.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 68.9 65.8 64.4 64.0 70.7 70.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 78.1 74.7 70.5 74.6 80.9 81.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 80.1 77.0 74.5 75.7 82.2 82.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 672 1447 3118 6718
LDN 652 1405 3027 6521
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 105,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 10,500 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.1 73.7 72.8 68.7 76.2 76.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.2 67.1 65.8 65.4 72.0 72.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.5 76.1 71.9 75.9 82.3 82.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.4 78.4 75.8 77.0 83.6 83.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 826 1780 3834 8261
LDN 802 1728 3722 8019
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Sheilds Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 104,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 10,400 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.0 73.6 72.8 68.7 76.2 76.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.2 67.1 65.7 65.3 72.0 72.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.4 76.0 71.8 75.9 82.2 82.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.4 78.3 75.8 77.0 83.5 83.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 821 1768 3810 8208
LDN 797 1717 3698 7968
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY State Route 99 DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 107,000 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 65 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 88 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 10,700 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.692 0.142 0.166 0.770 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 89.8 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.592 0.108 0.295 0.048 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 89.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.548 0.052 0.400 0.182 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 89.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 76.1 73.8 72.9 68.8 76.3 76.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 70.3 67.2 65.8 65.4 72.1 72.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 79.5 76.1 72.0 76.0 82.4 82.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 81.5 78.5 75.9 77.1 83.6 83.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 837 1802 3883 8365
LDN 812 1750 3769 8121
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Herndon Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Garfield Ave to N. Parkway Drive ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 18.3 16.4 14.6 8.8 17.3 17.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 15.2 13.7 10.1 3.6 13.3 13.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 11.9 6.3 15.3 -15.6 8.1 12.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 20.6 18.5 18.7 10.0 19.1 20.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 0
LDN 0 0 0 0
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Bullard Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Garfield Ave to N. Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,683 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 668 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.6 54.6 52.9 47.1 55.6 56.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.4 51.9 48.4 41.9 51.6 52.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.1 44.5 53.6 22.6 46.4 50.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.9 56.8 56.9 48.2 57.4 58.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 36 77 167
LDN 14 31 67 144
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Bullard Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,706 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 971 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 58.2 56.2 54.5 48.7 57.2 57.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.1 53.5 50.0 43.5 53.2 53.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 51.7 46.1 55.2 24.2 48.0 51.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 60.5 58.4 58.5 49.9 59.0 60.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 21 46 99 214
LDN 19 40 86 185
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Bullard Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to SR-99 ENGINEER: M. Dickerson
LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 21.5 19.6 17.8 12.0 20.5 21.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 16.9 15.4 11.9 5.4 15.1 15.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 12.9 7.3 16.4 -14.6 9.2 13.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 23.2 21.2 20.8 12.9 21.8 22.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Garfield to N. Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1,310 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 131 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.7 50.7 49.0 43.2 51.7 52.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 48.1 46.6 43.0 36.6 46.3 46.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 44.1 38.5 47.6 16.6 40.3 44.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 54.4 52.3 51.9 44.0 53.0 53.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 8 18 39 84
LDN 7 16 34 74
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 14,804 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,480 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.0 58.1 56.3 50.5 59.0 59.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.9 55.4 51.8 45.3 55.1 55.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.6 48.0 57.1 26.1 49.8 53.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.4 60.2 60.4 51.7 60.8 61.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 28 61 132 283
LDN 25 53 114 245
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Contessa Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 23.1 21.2 19.4 13.6 22.1 22.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 18.0 16.5 12.9 6.4 16.1 16.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 13.7 8.1 17.1 -13.8 9.9 13.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 24.6 22.6 22.0 14.4 23.3 24.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Barstow Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Contessa Ave to N. Island Waterpark Drive ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 21.6 19.7 17.9 12.1 20.6 21.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 17.0 15.5 12.0 5.5 15.2 15.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 13.0 7.4 16.5 -14.5 9.3 13.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 23.3 21.3 20.9 13.0 22.0 22.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Garfield Ave to N. Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,820 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,682 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.5 58.7 56.1 51.3 59.6 60.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.6 54.0 50.5 45.8 54.5 55.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 61.1 59.6 54.0 51.0 59.8 60.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.4 62.8 58.9 54.7 63.3 63.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 38 82 178 383
LDN 36 78 167 360
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 47,627 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,763 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.0 63.2 60.6 55.8 64.2 64.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.1 58.6 55.1 50.3 59.0 59.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.6 64.1 58.5 55.5 64.3 64.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.9 67.3 63.4 59.2 67.9 68.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 77 165 356 766
LDN 72 155 334 720
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to 1,300 ft east of N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 45,973 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,597 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.9 63.0 60.5 55.6 64.0 64.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.0 58.4 54.9 50.1 58.9 59.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.4 63.9 58.4 55.3 64.2 64.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.8 67.1 63.3 59.1 67.7 68.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 75 161 347 748
LDN 70 152 327 703
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,300 ft east of N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 54,592 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 5,459 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.8 67.0 64.4 59.6 67.9 68.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.4 60.9 57.4 52.6 61.4 61.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 67.2 65.7 60.1 57.1 66.0 66.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.6 70.0 66.4 62.0 70.6 71.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 117 253 544 1173
LDN 110 237 510 1099
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Shaw Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to State Route 99 ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 88,601 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 8,860 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 71.0 69.2 66.6 61.8 70.2 70.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 64.7 63.1 59.6 54.8 63.6 64.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 69.4 68.0 62.4 59.3 68.2 68.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.9 72.2 68.6 64.3 72.8 73.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 165 355 765 1648
LDN 154 333 717 1545
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,300 ft west of N. Bryan Ave to Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,954 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 695 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 56.7 54.8 53.0 47.2 55.7 56.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.6 52.1 48.6 42.1 51.8 52.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.3 44.7 53.8 22.8 46.6 50.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.1 56.9 57.1 48.4 57.6 58.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 37 79 171
LDN 15 32 69 148
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,025 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,103 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 58.7 56.8 55.0 49.2 57.7 58.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.6 54.1 50.6 44.1 53.8 54.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 52.3 46.7 55.8 24.8 48.6 52.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.1 58.9 59.1 50.4 59.6 60.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 23 50 108 233
LDN 20 43 94 202
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,739 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,874 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.0 59.1 57.3 51.6 60.0 60.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.9 56.4 52.9 46.4 56.1 56.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.6 49.0 58.1 27.1 50.9 54.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.4 61.2 61.4 52.7 61.9 62.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 33 71 154 332
LDN 29 62 133 287
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Gettysburg Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Barcus ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,002 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 900 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.1 59.2 57.4 51.7 60.2 60.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.6 55.1 51.5 45.0 54.7 55.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 52.6 47.0 56.0 25.1 48.8 52.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.9 60.8 60.4 52.5 61.5 62.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 31 66 143 308
LDN 27 58 126 271
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Garfield to N. Grantland ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 14,056 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,406 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.1 61.2 59.4 53.6 62.1 62.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.5 57.0 53.5 47.0 56.7 57.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.5 48.9 58.0 27.0 50.8 54.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.8 62.7 62.3 54.5 63.4 64.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 41 89 192 414
LDN 36 79 169 365
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 46,920 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,692 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.1 66.3 63.8 58.9 67.3 67.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.8 60.2 56.7 52.0 60.7 61.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 66.6 65.1 59.5 56.5 65.3 65.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.0 69.3 65.7 61.4 70.0 70.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 106 228 492 1060
LDN 99 214 461 994
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 40,410 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,041 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.3 62.5 59.9 55.1 63.5 63.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.4 57.8 54.3 49.6 58.3 58.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.9 63.4 57.8 54.8 63.6 63.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.2 66.6 62.7 58.5 67.1 67.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 69 148 319 687
LDN 65 139 300 646
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 44,366 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,437 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.7 62.9 60.3 55.5 63.9 64.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.8 58.2 54.7 50.0 58.7 59.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.3 63.8 58.2 55.2 64.0 64.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.6 67.0 63.1 58.9 67.6 68.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 73 157 339 731
LDN 69 148 319 687
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 43,099 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,310 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.6 62.8 60.2 55.4 63.7 64.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.7 58.1 54.6 49.8 58.6 59.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.1 63.7 58.1 55.1 63.9 64.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.5 66.9 63.0 58.8 67.4 67.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 72 154 333 717
LDN 67 145 313 674
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 58,827 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 5,883 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.0 64.1 61.6 56.7 65.1 65.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.0 59.5 56.0 51.2 59.9 60.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 66.5 65.0 59.4 56.4 65.2 65.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.9 68.2 64.3 60.2 68.8 69.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 88 190 409 882
LDN 83 179 385 829
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Ashlan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to State Route 99 ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 66,788 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 6,679 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.5 64.7 62.1 57.3 65.6 66.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.6 60.0 56.5 51.8 60.5 60.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 67.1 65.6 60.0 57.0 65.8 66.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.4 68.8 64.9 60.7 69.3 69.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 96 207 445 960
LDN 90 194 419 902
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Barcus Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,139 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,614 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.4 58.5 56.7 50.9 59.4 60.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.3 55.8 52.2 45.7 55.4 56.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.0 48.4 57.4 26.5 50.2 54.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.7 60.6 60.7 52.1 61.2 62.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 30 65 139 300
LDN 26 56 121 260
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Barcus Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,139 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,614 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.6 61.6 59.9 54.1 62.6 63.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.0 57.5 53.9 47.5 57.2 57.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.0 49.4 58.5 27.5 51.3 55.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.3 63.2 62.8 54.9 63.9 64.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 45 96 207 446
LDN 39 85 182 393
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 14,878 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,488 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.0 58.1 56.3 50.6 59.0 59.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.9 55.4 51.9 45.4 55.1 55.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.6 48.0 57.1 26.1 49.9 53.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.4 60.2 60.4 51.7 60.9 61.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 28 61 132 284
LDN 25 53 114 246
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 14,338 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,434 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.9 57.9 56.2 50.4 58.9 59.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.8 55.2 51.7 45.2 54.9 55.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.4 47.8 56.9 25.9 49.7 53.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.2 60.1 60.2 51.6 60.7 61.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 28 60 129 277
LDN 24 52 111 240
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to N Brawley Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 13,124 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,312 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.5 57.6 55.8 50.0 58.5 59.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.4 54.9 51.3 44.8 54.5 55.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.1 47.5 56.5 25.6 49.3 53.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.8 59.7 59.8 51.2 60.3 61.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 26 56 121 262
LDN 23 49 105 226
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Dakota Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Brawley Ave to N. Parkway Drive ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 7,448 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 745 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 57.0 55.1 53.3 47.5 56.0 56.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.9 52.4 48.9 42.4 52.1 52.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 50.6 45.0 54.1 23.1 46.9 50.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.4 57.2 57.4 48.7 57.9 58.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 18 39 83 179
LDN 16 33 72 155
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Garfield Ave to Grantland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 18.3 16.4 14.6 8.8 17.3 17.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 15.2 13.7 10.1 3.6 13.3 13.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 11.9 6.3 15.3 -15.6 8.1 12.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 20.6 18.5 18.7 10.0 19.1 20.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 0
LDN 0 0 0 0
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 13,365 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,337 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.6 57.6 55.9 50.1 58.6 59.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.5 54.9 51.4 44.9 54.6 55.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.1 47.5 56.6 25.6 49.4 53.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.9 59.8 59.9 51.2 60.4 61.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 26 57 123 265
LDN 23 49 106 229
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,656 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,566 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.2 58.3 56.6 50.8 59.3 59.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.1 55.6 52.1 45.6 55.3 55.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.8 48.2 57.3 26.3 50.1 53.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.6 60.5 60.6 51.9 61.1 62.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 29 63 137 294
LDN 25 55 118 255
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 12,337 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,234 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.2 57.3 55.5 49.7 58.2 58.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.1 54.6 51.0 44.6 54.3 54.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 52.8 47.2 56.3 25.3 49.0 52.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.6 59.4 59.6 50.9 60.1 61.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 25 54 116 251
LDN 22 47 101 217
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to N. Dante Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,436 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,144 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.8 62.9 61.1 55.3 63.8 64.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.2 58.7 55.2 48.7 58.4 58.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.2 50.6 59.7 28.7 52.5 56.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.5 64.5 64.1 56.2 65.1 66.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 54 116 250 539
LDN 47 102 220 475
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Dante Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,436 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,144 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.8 62.9 61.1 55.3 63.8 64.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.2 58.7 55.2 48.7 58.4 58.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.2 50.6 59.7 28.7 52.5 56.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.5 64.5 64.1 56.2 65.1 66.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 54 116 250 539
LDN 47 102 220 475
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 19,552 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,955 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.2 59.3 57.5 51.7 60.2 60.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.1 56.6 53.0 46.6 56.3 56.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.8 49.2 58.3 27.3 51.0 54.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.6 61.4 61.6 52.9 62.1 63.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 34 73 158 341
LDN 30 64 137 295
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to N. Brawley Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,141 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,114 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.6 59.6 57.9 52.1 60.6 61.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.4 56.9 53.4 46.9 56.6 57.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.1 49.5 58.6 27.6 51.4 55.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.9 61.8 61.9 53.2 62.4 63.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 36 77 167 359
LDN 31 67 144 311
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Brawley Ave to N. Valentine Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 19,787 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,979 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.3 59.3 57.6 51.8 60.3 60.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.2 56.6 53.1 46.6 56.3 56.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.8 49.2 58.3 27.3 51.1 54.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.6 61.5 61.6 53.0 62.1 63.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 34 74 160 344
LDN 30 64 138 298
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Sheilds Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Valentine Ave to N. Marks Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 19,278 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,928 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.2 59.2 57.5 51.7 60.2 60.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.0 56.5 53.0 46.5 56.2 56.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.7 49.1 58.2 27.2 51.0 54.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.5 61.4 61.5 52.8 62.0 62.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 34 73 157 338
LDN 29 63 136 293
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Grantland Ave to N. Bryan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 2,448 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 245 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 52.1 50.3 47.8 42.9 51.3 51.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 47.2 45.7 42.2 37.4 46.1 46.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 52.7 51.2 45.6 42.6 51.4 51.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 56.0 54.4 50.5 46.4 55.0 55.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 11 23 49 106
LDN 10 21 46 100
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Bryan Ave to N. Hayes Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 10,251 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,025 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 58.4 56.5 54.0 49.1 57.5 58.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.4 51.9 48.4 43.6 52.4 52.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.9 57.4 51.8 48.8 57.6 57.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.3 60.6 56.7 52.6 61.2 61.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 28 59 128 275
LDN 26 56 120 259
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Hayes Ave to N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,239 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,124 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 58.8 56.9 54.4 49.5 57.9 58.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.8 52.3 48.8 44.0 52.8 53.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 59.3 57.8 52.2 49.2 58.0 58.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.7 61.0 57.1 53.0 61.6 62.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 29 63 136 293
LDN 28 59 128 275
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Polk Ave to 1900 ft east of N. Polk Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 13,878 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,388 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.7 57.8 55.3 50.4 58.8 59.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 54.7 53.2 49.7 44.9 53.7 54.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 60.2 58.7 53.2 50.1 59.0 59.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.6 61.9 58.0 53.9 62.5 62.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 34 73 156 337
LDN 32 68 147 317
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1900 east of N. Polk Ave to N. Cornelia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,298 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,130 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.7 62.9 60.3 55.5 63.9 64.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.3 56.8 53.3 48.5 57.3 57.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.1 61.6 56.1 53.0 61.9 62.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.6 65.9 62.3 58.0 66.5 66.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 63 135 291 626
LDN 59 126 272 587
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Cornelia Ave to N. Milburn Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 24,727 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,473 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.0 65.2 62.6 57.8 66.1 66.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.0 58.5 55.0 50.2 59.0 59.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.5 63.0 57.4 54.4 63.3 63.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.5 67.8 64.3 59.9 68.5 68.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 84 182 392 844
LDN 79 170 367 790
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Milburn Ave to N. Blythe Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 29,368 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,937 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.2 64.4 61.8 57.0 65.4 65.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.9 58.3 54.8 50.0 58.8 59.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.6 63.2 57.6 54.6 63.4 63.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.1 67.4 63.8 59.5 68.0 68.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 79 170 366 789
LDN 74 159 343 740
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Blythe Ave to N Sonora Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 24,727 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,473 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.0 65.2 62.6 57.8 66.1 66.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.0 58.5 55.0 50.2 59.0 59.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.5 63.0 57.4 54.4 63.3 63.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.5 67.8 64.3 59.9 68.5 68.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 84 182 392 844
LDN 79 170 367 790
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Sonora Ave to N Brawley Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 24,727 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,473 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.5 63.6 61.1 56.2 64.6 65.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.1 57.6 54.1 49.3 58.0 58.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.9 62.4 56.8 53.8 62.6 62.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.3 66.6 63.1 58.7 67.3 67.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 70 152 327 704
LDN 66 142 306 660
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Brawley Ave to N. Knoll Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 29,368 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,937 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.2 64.4 61.8 57.0 65.4 65.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.9 58.3 54.8 50.0 58.8 59.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.6 63.2 57.6 54.6 63.4 63.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.1 67.4 63.8 59.5 68.0 68.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 79 170 366 789
LDN 74 159 343 740
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Knoll Ave to 850 ft east of N. Knoll Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 29,368 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,937 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.1 64.3 61.7 56.9 65.2 65.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.7 58.2 54.7 49.9 58.7 59.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.5 63.0 57.4 54.4 63.3 63.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.0 67.3 63.7 59.4 67.9 68.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 78 167 360 776
LDN 73 157 337 727
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT 850 east of N. Knoll Ave to N. Valentine Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 29,368 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,937 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.9 61.1 58.5 53.7 62.1 62.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.0 56.5 53.0 48.2 56.9 57.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.5 62.0 56.4 53.4 62.2 62.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.8 65.2 61.3 57.1 65.8 66.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 55 120 258 555
LDN 52 112 242 522
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Valentine Ave to N. Marks Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 39,715 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,972 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.4 65.6 63.0 58.2 66.6 67.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.1 59.5 56.0 51.2 60.0 60.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.8 64.4 58.8 55.7 64.6 64.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.3 68.6 65.0 60.7 69.2 69.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 95 204 440 949
LDN 89 192 413 889
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY W. Clinton Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Marks Ave to W. Vassar Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 58,312 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 50 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 66 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 5,831 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 94.4 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 94.4 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 94.4 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 70.7 68.9 66.4 61.5 69.9 70.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 63.8 62.2 58.7 53.9 62.7 63.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 68.3 66.8 61.2 58.2 67.0 67.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 73.2 71.5 68.0 63.6 72.2 72.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 149 322 694 1495
LDN 140 302 650 1400
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Herndon Ave to W. Bullard Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,249 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 425 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.5 52.7 50.2 45.3 53.7 54.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.6 48.1 44.6 39.8 48.5 49.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.1 53.6 48.0 45.0 53.8 54.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.4 56.8 52.9 48.8 57.4 57.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 15 33 71 153
LDN 14 31 67 144
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Bullard Ave to W. Barstow Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,862 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 486 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.1 53.3 50.7 45.9 54.3 54.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.2 48.6 45.1 40.4 49.1 49.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.7 54.2 48.6 45.6 54.4 54.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.0 57.4 53.5 49.3 58.0 58.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 36 78 167
LDN 16 34 73 157
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Barstow Ave to 1,000 ft south of W. Barston Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,253 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 525 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 58.6 56.8 54.3 49.4 57.8 58.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.3 50.7 47.2 42.4 51.2 51.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 57.0 55.6 50.0 47.0 55.8 56.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.5 59.8 56.2 51.9 60.4 60.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 25 53 114 246
LDN 23 50 107 231
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,000 ft south of W. Barstow Ave to W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,253 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 525 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 58.6 56.8 54.3 49.4 57.8 58.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 52.3 50.7 47.2 42.4 51.2 51.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 57.0 55.6 50.0 47.0 55.8 56.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 61.5 59.8 56.2 51.9 60.4 60.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 25 53 114 246
LDN 23 50 107 231
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,702 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 570 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.8 54.0 51.4 46.6 54.9 55.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.9 49.3 45.8 41.1 49.8 50.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.4 54.9 49.3 46.3 55.1 55.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.7 58.1 54.2 50.0 58.6 59.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 19 40 86 186
LDN 17 38 81 175
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 5,381 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 538 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.6 53.7 51.2 46.3 54.7 55.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.6 49.1 45.6 40.8 49.6 50.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.1 54.6 49.0 46.0 54.8 55.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.5 57.8 53.9 49.8 58.4 58.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 18 39 83 179
LDN 17 36 78 168
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 18.3 16.4 13.9 9.0 17.4 17.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 13.3 11.8 8.3 3.5 12.2 12.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 18.8 17.3 11.7 8.7 17.5 17.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 22.2 20.5 16.6 12.5 21.1 21.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Garfield Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Sheilds Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,998 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 500 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 55.2 53.4 50.9 46.0 54.4 54.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 50.3 48.8 45.3 40.5 49.2 49.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.8 54.3 48.7 45.7 54.5 54.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 59.1 57.5 53.6 49.5 58.1 58.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 17 37 79 170
LDN 16 35 74 160
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Parkway Drive DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N Herndon Ave to W. Herndon Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 4,166 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 417 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 54.5 52.6 50.1 45.2 53.6 54.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 49.5 48.0 44.5 39.7 48.4 48.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.0 53.5 47.9 44.9 53.7 54.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 58.4 56.7 52.8 48.7 57.3 57.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 15 33 70 151
LDN 14 31 66 142
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W. Bullard Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 18.3 16.4 14.6 8.8 17.3 17.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 15.2 13.7 10.1 3.6 13.3 13.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 11.9 6.3 15.3 -15.6 8.1 12.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 20.6 18.5 18.7 10.0 19.1 20.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 0
LDN 0 0 0 0
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Bullard Ave to W. Barstow Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 11,947 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,195 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.2 60.4 57.8 53.0 61.3 61.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.8 54.3 50.8 46.0 54.8 55.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 60.6 59.1 53.5 50.5 59.4 59.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.1 63.4 59.8 55.5 64.0 64.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 43 92 198 426
LDN 40 86 185 399
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Barstow Ave to W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,386 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,539 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.3 61.5 58.9 54.1 62.4 62.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.9 55.4 51.9 47.1 55.9 56.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 61.7 60.2 54.6 51.6 60.5 60.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.1 64.5 60.9 56.5 65.1 65.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 50 109 234 504
LDN 47 102 219 472
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 45,056 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,506 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.8 63.0 60.4 55.5 63.9 64.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.9 58.3 54.8 50.0 58.8 59.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.3 63.9 58.3 55.3 64.1 64.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.7 67.1 63.2 59.0 67.6 68.0
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 74 159 343 738
LDN 69 150 322 694
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 55,863 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 5,586 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 68.9 67.1 64.5 59.7 68.0 68.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 62.5 61.0 57.5 52.7 61.5 61.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 67.3 65.8 60.2 57.2 66.1 66.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 71.7 70.1 66.5 62.1 70.7 71.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 119 257 553 1191
LDN 112 240 518 1116
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 21.4 19.6 17.0 12.2 20.6 21.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 15.1 13.5 10.0 5.2 14.0 14.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 19.8 18.4 12.8 9.8 18.6 18.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 24.3 22.6 19.0 14.7 23.2 23.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Sheilds Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 40,268 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 4,027 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 67.5 65.6 63.1 58.2 66.6 67.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.1 59.6 56.1 51.3 60.0 60.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 65.9 64.4 58.8 55.8 64.6 64.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 70.3 68.7 65.1 60.7 69.3 69.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 96 206 444 957
LDN 90 193 416 897
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Grantland Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,521 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,552 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.5 63.7 61.1 56.3 64.6 65.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.1 57.6 54.1 49.3 58.1 58.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.9 62.4 56.8 53.8 62.6 62.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.3 66.7 63.1 58.7 67.3 67.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 71 152 328 706
LDN 66 143 307 662
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Santa Ana Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,311 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,131 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.6 59.7 57.9 52.1 60.6 61.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.5 57.0 53.4 46.9 56.6 57.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.2 49.6 58.6 27.7 51.4 55.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.9 61.8 61.9 53.3 62.4 63.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 36 78 168 361
LDN 31 67 145 313
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Santa Ana Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,311 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,131 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.6 59.7 57.9 52.1 60.6 61.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.5 57.0 53.4 46.9 56.6 57.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.2 49.6 58.6 27.7 51.4 55.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.9 61.8 61.9 53.3 62.4 63.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 36 78 168 361
LDN 31 67 145 313
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,216 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,822 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.1 62.2 60.4 54.6 63.1 63.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.5 58.0 54.5 48.0 57.7 58.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.5 49.9 59.0 28.0 51.8 55.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.8 63.8 63.4 55.5 64.4 65.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 48 104 225 484
LDN 43 92 198 426
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 1 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 0 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 21.5 19.6 17.8 12.0 20.5 21.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 16.9 15.4 11.9 5.4 15.1 15.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 12.9 7.3 16.4 -14.6 9.2 13.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 23.2 21.2 20.8 12.9 21.8 22.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 0 0 0 1
LDN 0 0 0 1
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 18,966 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,897 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.1 59.2 57.4 51.6 60.1 60.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.0 56.5 52.9 46.4 56.1 56.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.7 49.1 58.1 27.2 50.9 54.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.4 61.3 61.4 52.8 61.9 62.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 33 72 155 334
LDN 29 62 134 289
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Bryan Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 13,631 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,363 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.6 57.7 55.9 50.2 58.7 59.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.5 55.0 51.5 45.0 54.7 55.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.2 47.6 56.7 25.7 49.5 53.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.0 59.9 60.0 51.3 60.5 61.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 27 58 124 268
LDN 23 50 108 232
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Santa Ana Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 22,778 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,278 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.2 63.2 61.5 55.7 64.2 64.8
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.6 59.1 55.6 49.1 58.8 59.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.6 51.0 60.1 29.1 52.9 56.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.9 64.8 64.4 56.6 65.5 66.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 57 123 265 572
LDN 50 108 234 503
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Santa Ana Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 22,778 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,278 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.1 63.1 61.4 55.6 64.1 64.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.5 59.0 55.4 49.0 58.7 59.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.5 50.9 60.0 29.0 52.7 56.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.8 64.7 64.3 56.4 65.4 66.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 56 121 261 562
LDN 49 107 230 495
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Swift Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,950 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,595 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.6 63.7 61.9 56.1 64.6 65.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 61.1 59.6 56.0 49.5 59.2 59.8
HEAVY TRUCKS 57.1 51.5 60.5 29.6 53.3 57.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.4 65.3 64.9 57.0 66.0 66.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 61 132 284 613
LDN 54 116 250 539
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Swift Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,950 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,595 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.4 60.5 58.7 53.0 61.5 62.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.3 57.8 54.3 47.8 57.5 58.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.0 50.4 59.5 28.5 52.3 56.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.8 62.7 62.8 54.1 63.3 64.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 41 89 191 412
LDN 36 77 166 357
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashland Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 29,995 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,000 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.1 61.1 59.4 53.6 62.1 62.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.0 58.4 54.9 48.4 58.1 58.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.6 51.0 60.1 29.1 52.9 56.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.4 63.3 63.4 54.8 63.9 64.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 45 98 211 454
LDN 39 85 182 393
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to 1,300 ft South of W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,197 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,120 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.6 59.6 57.9 52.1 60.6 61.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.5 56.9 53.4 46.9 56.6 57.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.1 49.5 58.6 27.6 51.4 55.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.9 61.8 61.9 53.3 62.4 63.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 36 78 167 360
LDN 31 67 145 312
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT 1,300 ft South of W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,197 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,120 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.7 62.8 61.0 55.3 63.8 64.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.2 58.7 55.1 48.6 58.3 58.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.2 50.6 59.7 28.7 52.4 56.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.5 64.4 64.0 56.1 65.1 65.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 54 115 249 535
LDN 47 102 219 471
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Hayes Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 17,552 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,755 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.7 58.8 57.0 51.3 59.8 60.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.6 56.1 52.6 46.1 55.8 56.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.3 48.7 57.8 26.8 50.6 54.4
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.1 61.0 61.1 52.4 61.6 62.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 32 68 147 317
LDN 27 59 128 275
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT North of W. Shaw Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson
LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 6,568 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 657 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 59.6 57.8 55.2 50.4 58.7 59.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 53.2 51.7 48.2 43.4 52.2 52.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 58.0 56.5 50.9 47.9 56.8 57.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.5 60.8 57.2 52.9 61.4 61.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 29 62 133 286
LDN 27 58 124 268
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Shaw Ave to W. Acacia Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,762 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,576 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.5 63.7 61.2 56.3 64.7 65.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.2 57.6 54.1 49.4 58.1 58.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.0 62.5 56.9 53.9 62.7 63.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.4 66.7 63.1 58.8 67.4 67.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 71 153 330 711
LDN 67 144 309 666
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Acaia Ave to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 25,762 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 44 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,576 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 97.6 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 97.6 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 97.6 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 65.7 63.8 61.3 56.4 64.8 65.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 59.3 57.7 54.2 49.5 58.2 58.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.1 62.6 57.0 54.0 62.8 63.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 68.5 66.8 63.2 58.9 67.5 67.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 72 156 336 723
LDN 68 146 315 678
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg Ave to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 31,612 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,161 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.3 61.4 58.9 54.0 62.4 62.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.3 56.8 53.3 48.5 57.2 57.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.8 62.3 56.7 53.7 62.5 62.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.2 65.5 61.6 57.5 66.1 66.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 58 126 271 583
LDN 55 118 254 548
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashland Ave to W. Griffith Way ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 31,840 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,184 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.3 61.4 58.9 54.0 62.4 62.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.4 56.8 53.3 48.5 57.3 57.7
HEAVY TRUCKS 63.8 62.4 56.8 53.7 62.6 62.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 67.2 65.6 61.7 57.5 66.1 66.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 59 126 272 586
LDN 55 119 256 551
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Griffith Way to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 31,840 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 3,184 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 66.5 64.6 62.1 57.2 65.6 66.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.1 58.5 55.0 50.3 59.0 59.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 64.9 63.4 57.8 54.8 63.6 63.9
VEHICULAR NOISE 69.3 67.6 64.0 59.7 68.3 68.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 82 176 380 819
LDN 77 165 356 767
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 23,801 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,380 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 62.0 60.2 57.6 52.8 61.2 61.6
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.1 55.5 52.0 47.3 56.0 56.5
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.6 61.1 55.5 52.5 61.3 61.6
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.9 64.3 60.4 56.2 64.8 65.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 48 104 224 482
LDN 45 98 211 454
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Polk Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 21,944 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,194 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.7 59.8 57.3 52.4 60.8 61.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.7 55.2 51.7 46.9 55.7 56.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 62.2 60.7 55.1 52.1 61.0 61.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.6 63.9 60.0 55.9 64.5 64.9
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 46 98 212 457
LDN 43 93 199 430
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W. Gettysburg Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 9,222 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 922 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.1 59.2 57.4 51.7 60.1 60.7
MEDIUM TRUCKS 56.6 55.1 51.5 45.0 54.7 55.3
HEAVY TRUCKS 52.6 47.0 56.0 25.1 48.8 52.7
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.9 60.8 60.4 52.5 61.5 62.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 31 66 143 307
LDN 27 58 126 271
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Gettysburg to W. Ashlan Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 22,141 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,214 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 64.9 63.0 61.2 55.5 63.9 64.5
MEDIUM TRUCKS 60.4 58.9 55.3 48.8 58.5 59.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 56.4 50.8 59.8 28.9 52.6 56.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 66.7 64.6 64.2 56.3 65.3 66.1
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 55 119 256 551
LDN 49 105 225 485
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashland Ave to W. Bellaire Way ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,570 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.4 61.5 59.7 54.0 62.5 63.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.9 57.4 53.8 47.3 57.0 57.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.9 49.3 58.3 27.4 51.1 55.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.2 63.1 62.7 54.8 63.8 64.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 44 94 203 438
LDN 39 83 179 386
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Bellaire Way to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,700 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,570 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.4 61.5 59.7 54.0 62.5 63.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.9 57.4 53.8 47.3 57.0 57.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.9 49.3 58.3 27.4 51.1 55.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.2 63.1 62.7 54.8 63.8 64.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 44 94 203 438
LDN 39 83 179 386
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 17,844 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,784 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.8 58.9 57.1 51.3 59.8 60.4
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.7 56.2 52.6 46.2 55.9 56.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.4 48.8 57.9 26.9 50.6 54.5
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.2 61.0 61.2 52.5 61.7 62.6
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 32 69 149 321
LDN 28 60 129 278
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Cornelia Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 15,071 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,507 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.3 61.3 59.6 53.8 62.3 62.9
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.7 57.2 53.7 47.2 56.9 57.4
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.7 49.1 58.2 27.2 51.0 54.8
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.0 62.9 62.5 54.6 63.6 64.4
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 43 92 198 426
LDN 38 81 174 375
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Blythe Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Ashlan Ave to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 17,215 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,722 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.785 0.109 0.107 0.934 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.840 0.094 0.094 0.032 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.853 0.059 0.088 0.034 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.6 58.8 56.2 51.4 59.7 60.2
MEDIUM TRUCKS 55.7 54.1 50.6 45.9 54.6 55.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 61.2 59.7 54.1 51.1 59.9 60.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 64.5 62.9 59.0 54.8 63.4 63.8
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 39 84 180 389
LDN 37 79 170 365
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Blythe Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W Shields Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 17,269 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,727 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.7 58.8 57.0 51.2 59.7 60.3
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.6 56.0 52.5 46.0 55.7 56.2
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.3 48.6 57.7 26.7 50.5 54.3
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.0 60.9 61.0 52.4 61.5 62.5
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 31 68 146 314
LDN 27 59 126 272
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N. Blythe Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W Shields Ave to W. Clinton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,106 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,611 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.4 58.4 56.7 50.9 59.4 60.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.3 55.7 52.2 45.7 55.4 55.9
HEAVY TRUCKS 53.9 48.3 57.4 26.4 50.2 54.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.7 60.6 60.7 52.1 61.2 62.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 30 65 139 300
LDN 26 56 120 259
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT N. Parkway Drive to W. Dakota Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 20,943 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 100
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 100 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 2,094 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 99.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 99.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 99.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 61.5 59.6 57.8 52.0 60.5 61.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.4 56.9 53.3 46.9 56.6 57.1
HEAVY TRUCKS 55.1 49.5 58.6 27.6 51.3 55.2
VEHICULAR NOISE 63.9 61.7 61.9 53.2 62.4 63.3
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 36 77 166 357
LDN 31 67 143 309
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dakota Ave to W. Dayton Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,396 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 101
SPEED = 35 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 12 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 101 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,640 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 100.9 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 100.8 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 100.9 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 60.4 58.5 56.7 50.9 59.4 60.0
MEDIUM TRUCKS 57.3 55.8 52.2 45.7 55.4 56.0
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.0 48.4 57.4 26.5 50.2 54.1
VEHICULAR NOISE 62.7 60.6 60.7 52.1 61.2 62.2
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 30 65 141 303
LDN 26 57 122 263
VEHICLE MIX DATA
FHWA-RD-77-108 ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CNEL) - CALVENO PROJECT: West Area Specific Plan JOB #: 0462-19-01
ROADWAY N Brawley Ave DATE: 18-Sep-20
SEGMENT W. Dayton Ave to W. Cortland Ave ENGINEER: M. Dickerson LOCATION: City of Fresno, CA SCENARIO: Existing + Project + Cumulative
NOISE INPUT DATA
ROADWAY CONDITIONS RECEIVER INPUT DATA
0 ADT = 16,396 RECEIVER DISTANCE = 102
SPEED = 45 DIST C/L TO WALL = 0
PK HR % = 10 RECEIVER HEIGHT = 5
NEAR LANE/FAR LANE DIST = 24 WALL DISTANCE FROM RECEIVER = 102 ROAD ELEVATION = 0 PAD ELEVATION = 0
GRADE = 0 ROADWAY VIEW: LF ANGLE -90
PK HR VOL = 1,640 RT ANGLE 90
DF ANGLE 180
SITE CONDITIONS WALL INFORMATION
AUTOMOBILES 15 HTH WALL = 0 FT
MED TRUCKS 15 (HARD SITE=10, SOFT SITE=15) AMBIENT = 0
HVY TRUCKS 15 BARRIER = 0 (0=WALL,1=BERM)
MISC. VEHICLE INFO
VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVE NIGHT DAILY VEHICLE TYPE HEIGHT SLE DISTANCE GRADE ADJUSTMENT AUTOMOBILES 0.770 0.128 0.101 0.944 AUTOMOBILES = 2.00 101.3 - - MEDIUM TRUCKS 0.846 0.093 0.063 0.049 MEDIUM TRUCKS= 4.00 101.3 - - HEAVY TRUCKS 0.330 0.667 0.002 0.007 HEAVY TRUCKS = 8.01 101.3 0.0
NOISE OUTPUT DATA
NOISE IMPACTS (WITHOUT TOPO OR BARRIER SHIELDING)
VEHICLE TYPE PK HR LEQ DAY LEQ EVEN LEQ NIGHT LEQ LDN CNEL AUTOMOBILES 63.5 61.6 59.8 54.0 62.5 63.1
MEDIUM TRUCKS 58.9 57.4 53.9 47.4 57.1 57.6
HEAVY TRUCKS 54.9 49.3 58.4 27.4 51.2 55.0
VEHICULAR NOISE 65.2 63.2 62.8 54.9 63.9 64.7
NOISE CONTOUR (FT)
NOISE LEVELS 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA
CNEL 45 97 209 451
LDN 40 86 184 397
VEHICLE MIX DATA
APPENDIX G
Technical Memorandum – CEQA Impacts and Mitigations (VMT) FILENAME: H:\23\23674 - FRESNO WEST AREA SPECIFIC AREA PLAN EIR\REPORT\DRAFT\23674_CEQA MEMORANDUM_20210309.DOCX
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area
CEQA Impacts and Mitigations
Date: March 9, 2021 Project #: 23674
To: Steve McMurtry, De Novo Planning Group
From: Aaron Elias, Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
cc:
This memorandum presents the findings of the transportation impact analysis conducted for the Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area (herein referred to as the “Specific Plan”). The proposed Specific Plan will establish the land use planning and regulatory guidance, including the land use and zoning designations and policies, for the approximately 7,077-acre Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan Area is triangular in shape and located west of State Route 99. It is bounded on the south by West Clinton Avenue, and to the west by Grantland and Garfield Avenues (Figure 1). The Specific Plan Area includes the southwest portion of Highway City adjacent to State Route 99. The Specific Plan will serve as a bridge between the Fresno General Plan and individual development applications in the Specific Plan Area.
The Specific Plan seeks to provide for the orderly and consistent development that promotes and establishes the West Area as a complete neighborhood with enhanced transportation infrastructure, development of core commercial centers, creation of additional parkland, and encouraging the development of a diverse housing stock. The Specific Plan Area does not currently have needed commercial amenities, forcing residents to travel east of State Route 99 for retail services. The Specific Plan Area also lacks a complete roadway network and parkland.
Ultimately, the Specific Plan will provide the blueprint to develop up to 54,521 dwelling units (DU) (including 46,620 DU in the residential category and 7,901 DU in the mixed-use category) and 48,890,001.60 square feet (SF) of non-residential uses. The proposed land use plan also designates public facility uses that are currently existing within the Specific Plan Area, including schools and churches.
99 N BLYTHE AVE
W BLUFF AVE
N PARKWAY DR
N STATE ST
PRIV
ATE DR
W GRIFFITH WAY
W BROWNING AVE
W BARSTOW AVE N SALINAS AVE
N CRYSTAL AVE
N M
ARTY AVE
W HERNDON AVE N FORKNER AVE
W DUDLEY AVE
W ALAMOS AVE
W PALO ALTO AVE
W BOY SCOUT RD
N TH EI LE A
VE
N M
ONROE AVE
N CHATEAU FRESNO
AVE
W SPRUCE AVE
N MARKS AVE W FLORADORA AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
BRYAN
AVE
W YALE AVE
W OLIVE AVE
W RIALTO AVE
N G
ARFIELD AVE
N V SI TA
AVE
N
WEBER AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
V
A
N
NESS BLV
D
N GATES AVE
W CLINTON AVE
N
C
ORNEL AI A
VE
W SPRUCE AVE
W MCKINLEY AVE
W BARSTOW AVE
N DANTE A
VE
N EMERSON AVE
N
M
ARKS A
VE
W SIERRA AVE
N FIGARDEN DR
N HUGHES A
VE
N WEBER AVE
N
MILBURN
A
VE
N BRA
WLEY A
VE
W FIGARDEN DR
W RIVER VISTA DR
W ALLUVIAL AVE
W SHAW AVE
W BULLARD AVE
N BRYA
N
A
VE
W DAKOTA AVE
N GOLDEN STATE BLVD
N POLK A
VE
W BELMONT AVE
N
GRA
NTLA
N
D
A
VE
N BLYTHE A
VE
W SHIELDS AVE
N
V
ALENT NI E A
VE
W SAN JOSE AVE
N
M
ARTY
A
VE
W HERNDON AVE
W OLIVE AVE
N SANTA FE AVE
N HAYES A
VE
N
Figure 1
Specific Plan Area
Project
Boundary
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 3
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
EXISTING CONDITIONS
A description of the existing roadway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian components of the transportation system within the Specific Plan Area follow.
Roadway Network
The existing roadway network in the Specific Plan Area is composed of a street system made up of freeways, super arterials, arterial and collector roads. Roadway classifications listed are from the City of Fresno General Plan.
Freeways
State Route 99 (SR-99) is a six-lane freeway with a posted speed limit of 65 miles per hour. The northwest-southeast freeway connects most major cities in Central California including Chico, Bakersfield, Selma, Sacramento, Modesto, and Fresno. It also provides access to the greater freeway network with direct connections to State Route 180 and State Route 41.
The Project is bordered by SR-99 on the northeast side. The average daily traffic on SR-99 near the Project site ranges between approximately 82,000 and 112,000 vehicles per day. Bicyclists and pedestrians are not allowed on this facility.
Super Arterials
Grantland Avenue is a two-lane to four-lane north-south roadway with a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour near the Project site. The facility extents from I-99 on the north to Kearny Blvd on the south.
The facility is a four-lane roadway with a median north of Shaw Avenue, and a two-lane roadway south of Shaw Avenue. Sidewalks are limited, and additional sidewalks, Class I and Class II bikeways are planned along the roadway.
Veterans Boulevard is currently a single lane in each direction between Riverside Drive and N. Hayes Avenue east of SR 99 and a six-lane stub roadway west of SR 99. However, the Veterans Boulevard Interchange and Corridor Improvement Project is currently underway which will connect these two facilities and create a six-lane super arterial in northwest Fresno connecting Herndon Avenue in the north to Shaw Avenue in the south including the construction of an interchange with SR 99.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 4
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Arterials
North-South
Polk Avenue is a two-lane north-south roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 or 40 MPH near the Plan Area. The facility extends from SR-99 on the north to Olive Avenue on the south. Sidewalks and Class II bike lanes exist intermittently and are proposed along the roadway.
Shaw Avenue is a two-lane east-west roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 to 45 MPH near the Plan Area. The facility extents from the San Joaquin River on the west to the Friant-Kern Canal on the east.
Sidewalks and Class II bike lanes are proposed along the roadway.
Ashlan Avenue is a two-lane to four-lane east-west roadway with a posted speed limit of 40 to 50 MPH near the Plan Area. The facility extends from Grantland Ave on the west and becomes Watts Valley Road on the east. Sidewalks and Class II bike lanes exist intermittently and are proposed along the roadway.
Grantland Avenue north of Shaw Avenue is a two lane north-south roadway with a posted speed limit of 40 MPH in the Plan Area. North of Shaw Avenue, Grantland Avenue extends north to SR 99 near the Herndon Avenue interchange. There are no sidewalks of bicycle facilities on this facility.
Blythe Avenue from Ashlan Avenue to Dakota Avenue is a two lane north-south roadway with a center median located along most of its length. The speed limit is posted as 40 MPH. Sidewalks are generally available along frontages that have been developed but no sidewalks are present along undeveloped parcels. Class II bicycle lane exist intermittently in both the northbound and southbound directions.
Collectors
Collectors in the Specific Plan Area include the following:
• North-South
o Garfield Avenue
o Bryan Avenue
o Hayes Avenue
o Cornelia Avenue
o Blythe Avenue
o Brawley Avenue
o Valentine Avenue
o Marks Avenue
• East-west
o Bullard Avenue
o Barstow Avenue
o Gettysburg Avenue
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 5
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
o Dakota Avenue
o Shields Avenue
o Clinton Avenue
Collectors are generally two-lane roadways with posted speeds of 30 to 45 miles per hour. Sidewalks and bike lanes are generally not present but are proposed along most collectors.
Transit Facilities
Fresno is primarily served by the Fresno Area Express (FAX) transit system which operates bus service and paratransit operations servicing the city. Regional connections are provided by the Fresno County Rural Transit Agency (FCRTA) and Amtrak for travel outside of the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area.
Fresno Area Express (FAX)
FAX provides the principal bus service in the City of Fresno. It operates seventeen routes and Handy Ride, a paratransit operation, with a fleet of over 100 buses, and Handy Ride, its paratransit operation, with a fleet of over 50 vehicles. FAX operates three routes that directly serve the Specific Plan Area through nearby street-side bus stops, with additional service coming into the Plan Area in 2021. Bus service on these routes is detailed in Table 1 with the routes near the Specific Plan Area shown in Figure
2. Route 12 provides local commuter and weekend service with the route originating or terminating at Shields Avenue/Brawley Avenue and San Jose Avenue/Marty Avenue intersections where it concerts into Route 35. Between these two origin/destinations, the route has fixed stops as it runs mostly along Brawley Avenue and Cornelia in the Plan Area, from Clinton Avenue to Shaw Avenue. Key destinations served include Central High School, Inspiration Park, and Forestriere Underground Gardens.
Route 35 provides local commuter and weekend service with the route originating or terminating in the Plan Area at Shields Avenue/Brawley Avenue where it converts into Route 12 and on the east side of Fresno at the intersection of Belmont Avenue/Clovis Avenue. In the Plan Area, the route provides fixed stops along Brawley and Clinton Avenues. Key destinations served by the route include the DMV, Talking Book Library, Post Office, and the Social Security Office.
Route 39 provides local commuter and weekend service with the route originating or terminating at Brawley Avenue/Shields Avenue intersection and Fresno Yosemite International Air Terminal. Between these two origin/destinations, Route 39 runs in a loop from Clinton Avenue/Marks Avenue to Brawley Avenue/Shields Avenue in the Plan Area where it has fixed stops. Key destinations served include by Fresno High School, Fresno City College, Veteran’s Medical Center, and Alliant University.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 6
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Table 1: Bus Routes Serving the Project
Route Serving Day Times Frequency
12 &
35 Starting at Shaw and Brawley and serving
Forestiere Underground Gardens, Teague
Elementary School, Inspiration Park, Central
High School East, Tower District, DMV, Roeding
Park, Yosemite Middle School, and Social
Security Office
Weekday 6:00 AM 10:00 PM Every 30
Minutes
Weekend 7:00 AM 7:30 PM Every 30
Minutes
39 Starting at Brawley Avenue/ Shields Avenue and
serving Hamilton K-8, Fresno High School,
Fresno City College, VA Medical Center, McLane
High School, Alliant University, and Fresno
Yosemite International Air Terminal primarily
along Clinton Avenue
Weekday 5:30 AM 10:00 PM Every 30
Minutes
Weekend 7:30 AM 7:00 PM Every 30
Minutes
45 Along Ashlan Avenue serving Central High
School East, Copper Middle School, Blackbeard’s
Family Entertainment, Army Navy Reserve, and
ARC Fresno Production Center
Weekday 6:00 AM 9:00 PM Every 45
Minutes
Weekend 6:45 AM 7:00 PM Every 45
Minutes
Source: FAX website, www.fresno.gov/fax, accessed March 9, 2021 Kittelson & Associates, Inc., 2021
Route 45 is a proposed route that will begin operation in 2021. It is shown has a dashed line in Figure 2 Truck Facilities
There are designated truck routes in the Specific Plan Area according to the City of Fresno Public Works.
There are also County Permit routes in the Specific Plan Area which are the overweight vehicle corridors requiring special permit. Existing and future truck routes are shown in Figure 3. 99 N BLYTHE AVE
W BLUFF AVE
N PARKWAY DR
N STATE ST
PRIV
ATE DR
W GRIFFITH WAY
W BROWNING AVE
W BARSTOW AVE N SALINAS AVE
N CRYSTAL AVE
N M
ARTY AVE
W HERNDON AVE N FORKNER AVE
W DUDLEY AVE
W ALAMOS AVE
W PALO ALTO AVE
W BOY SCOUT RD
N TH EI LE A
VE
N M
ONROE AVE
N CHATEAU FRESNO
AVE
W SPRUCE AVE
N MARKS AVE W FLORADORA AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
BRYAN
AVE
W YALE AVE
W OLIVE AVE
W RIALTO AVE
N G
ARFIELD AVE
N V SI TA
AVE
N
WEBER AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
V
A
N
NESS BLV
D
N GATES AVE
W CLINTON AVE
N
C
ORNEL AI A
VE
W SPRUCE AVE
W MCKINLEY AVE
W BARSTOW AVE
N DANTE A
VE
N EMERSON AVE
N
M
ARKS A
VE
W SIERRA AVE
N FIGARDEN DR
N HUGHES A
VE
N WEBER AVE
N
MILBURN
A
VE
N BRA
WLEY A
VE
W FIGARDEN DR
W RIVER VISTA DR
W ALLUVIAL AVE
W SHAW AVE
W BULLARD AVE
N BRYA
N
A
VE
W DAKOTA AVE
N GOLDEN STATE BLVD
N POLK A
VE
W BELMONT AVE
N
GRA
NTLA
N
D
A
VE
N BLYTHE A
VE
W SHIELDS AVE
N
V
ALENT NI E A
VE
W SAN JOSE AVE
N
M
ARTY
A
VE
W HERNDON AVE
W OLIVE AVE
N SANTA FE AVE
N HAYES A
VE
N
Figure 3.14-3
Existing and Proposed Transit Service
in the Specific Plan Area
Project
Boundary
Route 12
Route 39
Route 35
Route 45
99 N BLYTHE AVE
W BLUFF AVE
N PARKWAY DR
N STATE ST
PRIV
ATE DR
W GRIFFITH WAY
W BROWNING AVE
W BARSTOW AVE N SALINAS AVE
N CRYSTAL AVE
N M
ARTY AVE
W HERNDON AVE N FORKNER AVE
W DUDLEY AVE
W ALAMOS AVE
W PALO ALTO AVE
W BOY SCOUT RD
N TH EI LE A
VE
N M
ONROE AVE
N CHATEAU FRESNO
AVE
W SPRUCE AVE
N MARKS AVE W FLORADORA AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
BRYAN
AVE
W YALE AVE
W OLIVE AVE
W RIALTO AVE
N G
ARFIELD AVE
N V SI TA
AVE
N
WEBER AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
V
A
N
NESS BLV
D
N GATES AVE
W CLINTON AVE
N
C
ORNEL AI A
VE
W SPRUCE AVE
W MCKINLEY AVE
W BARSTOW AVE
N DANTE A
VE
N EMERSON AVE
N
M
ARKS A
VE
W SIERRA AVE
N FIGARDEN DR
N HUGHES A
VE
N WEBER AVE
N
MILBURN
A
VE
N BRA
WLEY A
VE
W FIGARDEN DR
W RIVER VISTA DR
W ALLUVIAL AVE
W SHAW AVE
W BULLARD AVE
N BRYA
N
A
VE
W DAKOTA AVE
N GOLDEN STATE BLVD
N POLK A
VE
W BELMONT AVE
N
GRA
NTLA
N
D
A
VE
N BLYTHE A
VE
W SHIELDS AVE
N
V
ALENT NI E A
VE
W SAN JOSE AVE
N
M
ARTY
A
VE
W HERNDON AVE
W OLIVE AVE
N SANTA FE AVE
N HAYES A
VE
N
Project
Boundary
Existing Route
Future Planned Route
Figure 3
Existing and Planned Truck
Routes in the Specific Plan Area
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 9
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are important components of the transportation network in the Specific Plan Area. They not only offer non-vehicular opportunities for both commute and recreational trips but also provide connections to the region’s transit network.
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle facilities are defined by the following four classes1:
• Class I – Provides a completely separated facility designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians with crossing points minimized.
• Class II – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated lane for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.
• Class III – Provides a right-of-way designated by signs or permanent markings and shared with pedestrians and motorists.
• Class IV – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated lane for the exclusive use of bicyclists that is separated by a vertical element to provide further separation from motor vehicle traffic.
The City of Fresno adopted the Active Transportation Plan (ATP) in March 2017. This plan identifies existing and future planned bicycle facilities within the City’s jurisdiction.
The following bikeways are currently present within the study area at intermittent locations on major roads. They are shown graphically in Figure 4:
• Class II Bike Lanes
o East/West Streets
▪ Bullard Avenue, east of Grantland Avenue
▪ Barstow Avenue, west of Grantland Avenue
▪ Gettysburg Avenue, east of Hayes Avenue
▪ Ashlan Avenue, east of Cornelia Avenue
▪ Dakota Avenue, east of Polk Avenue
▪ Clinton Avenue, east of Cornelia Avenue
o North/ South Streets
▪ Grantland Avenue, south of SR-99
▪ Bryan Avenue, south of Gettysburg Avenue
▪ Hayes Avenue, south of Shaw Avenue
▪ Polk Avenue, south of Shaw Avenue
▪ Cornelia Avenue, south of Gettysburg Avenue
1 As detailed in Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design Manual (Caltrans, 2015).
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 10
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
▪ Brawley Avenue, south of Dakota Avenue
Planned and Proposed Bicycle Facilities
The ATP includes planned and proposed bikeway facilities in the Plan Area. They are discussed below and shown in Figure 4:
• Class I Bike Paths
o Grantland Avenue, south of Gettysburg Avenue
o Veteran’s Boulevard (proposed), north of Gettysburg Avenue o Gettysburg Avenue, east of Cornelia Avenue
• Class II Bike Lanes
o All arterials and collectors
Bike lanes on Veterans Blvd (proposed), Gettysburg Avenue, and Cornelia Avenue are identified as priority bikeways in the ATP.
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities are present in the Specific Plan Area. Sidewalks are present intermittently along some major roadways. Sidewalks are proposed on most arterials and collectors. Crosswalks are present intermittently at signalized and unsignalized intersections in the Specific Plan Area. Figure 5 shows existing and planned sidewalks in the Specific Plan Area.
The City of Fresno adopted the 2016 Update to the ADA Transition Plan for the Right of Way (ROW) in February 2016. The ROW Transition Plan incorporates retrofitting Curb Ramps, Sidewalks, and Accessible Pedestrian Signals and replaced the 2003 Amended Curb Ramp Transition Plan. 99 N BLYTHE AVE
W BLUFF AVE
N PARKWAY DR
N STATE ST
PRIV
ATE DR
W GRIFFITH WAY
W BROWNING AVE
W BARSTOW AVE N SALINAS AVE
N CRYSTAL AVE
N M
ARTY AVE
W HERNDON AVE N FORKNER AVE
W DUDLEY AVE
W ALAMOS AVE
W PALO ALTO AVE
W BOY SCOUT RD
N TH EI LE A
VE
N M
ONROE AVE
N CHATEAU FRESNO
AVE
W SPRUCE AVE
N MARKS AVE W FLORADORA AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
BRYAN
AVE
W YALE AVE
W OLIVE AVE
W RIALTO AVE
N G
ARFIELD AVE
N V SI TA
AVE
N
WEBER AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
V
A
N
NESS BLV
D
N GATES AVE
W CLINTON AVE
N
C
ORNEL AI A
VE
W SPRUCE AVE
W MCKINLEY AVE
W BARSTOW AVE
N DANTE A
VE
N EMERSON AVE
N
M
ARKS A
VE
W SIERRA AVE
N FIGARDEN DR
N HUGHES A
VE
N WEBER AVE
N
MILBURN
A
VE
N BRA
WLEY A
VE
W FIGARDEN DR
W RIVER VISTA DR
W ALLUVIAL AVE
W SHAW AVE
W BULLARD AVE
N BRYA
N
A
VE
W DAKOTA AVE
N GOLDEN STATE BLVD
N POLK A
VE
W BELMONT AVE
N
GRA
NTLA
N
D
A
VE
N BLYTHE A
VE
W SHIELDS AVE
N
V
ALENT NI E A
VE
W SAN JOSE AVE
N
M
ARTY
A
VE
W HERNDON AVE
W OLIVE AVE
N SANTA FE AVE
N HAYES A
VE
N
Figure 4
Existing and Proposed Bicycle
Routes in the Specific Plan Area
Project
Boundary
Existing Bicycle Facilities Planned Bicycle Facilities
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Lane
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Lane
RailstoTrails
99 N BLYTHE AVE
W BLUFF AVE
N PARKWAY DR
N STATE ST
PRIV
ATE DR
W GRIFFITH WAY
W BROWNING AVE
W BARSTOW AVE N SALINAS AVE
N CRYSTAL AVE
N M
ARTY AVE
W HERNDON AVE N FORKNER AVE
W DUDLEY AVE
W ALAMOS AVE
W PALO ALTO AVE
W BOY SCOUT RD
N TH EI LE A
VE
N M
ONROE AVE
N CHATEAU FRESNO
AVE
W SPRUCE AVE
N MARKS AVE W FLORADORA AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
BRYAN
AVE
W YALE AVE
W OLIVE AVE
W RIALTO AVE
N G
ARFIELD AVE
N V SI TA
AVE
N
WEBER AVE
W ASHLAN AVE
N
V
A
N
NESS BLV
D
N GATES AVE
W CLINTON AVE
N
C
ORNEL AI A
VE
W SPRUCE AVE
W MCKINLEY AVE
W BARSTOW AVE
N DANTE A
VE
N EMERSON AVE
N
M
ARKS A
VE
W SIERRA AVE
N FIGARDEN DR
N HUGHES A
VE
N WEBER AVE
N
MILBURN
A
VE
N BRA
WLEY A
VE
W FIGARDEN DR
W RIVER VISTA DR
W ALLUVIAL AVE
W SHAW AVE
W BULLARD AVE
N BRYA
N
A
VE
W DAKOTA AVE
N GOLDEN STATE BLVD
N POLK A
VE
W BELMONT AVE
N
GRA
NTLA
N
D
A
VE
N BLYTHE A
VE
W SHIELDS AVE
N
V
ALENT NI E A
VE
W SAN JOSE AVE
N
M
ARTY
A
VE
W HERNDON AVE
W OLIVE AVE
N SANTA FE AVE
N HAYES A
VE
N
Figure 5
Existing and Proposed Sidewalks in the Specific Plan Area Project
Boundary
Existing Sidewalk
Planned Sidewalk
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 13
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
REGULATORY SETTING
This section summarizes applicable federal, state, regional, and local plans, laws, and regulations that are relevant to this analysis. This information provides a context for the discussion related to the Project’s consistency with applicable policies, plans, laws, and regulations.
Federal
No federal plans, policies, regulations, or laws pertaining to transportation have been determined to be applicable to this Project.
State
Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) was signed into law in September 2013. Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013) required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the analysis of transportation impacts. Historically, CEQA transportation analyses of individual projects determined impacts in the circulation system in terms of roadway delay and/or capacity at specific locations. SB 743 changes include the elimination of auto delay, level of service (LOS), and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts. Those proposed changes identify vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts. Since the bill has gone into effect, automobile delay, as measured by “level of service” and other similar metrics, no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA. Auto-mobility (often expressed as “level of service”) may continue to be a measure for planning purposes.2 In December 2018, the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the State Natural Resources Agency submitted updated CEQA Guidelines to the Office of Administrative Law for final approval to implement SB 743. The Office of Administrative Law approved the updated CEQA Guidelines, thus implementing SB 743 and making VMT the primary metric used to analyze transportation impacts. The final text, final statement of reasons, and related materials are posted at http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa. The changes have been approved by the Office of the Administrative Law and are now in effect. For land use and transportation projects, SB 743-compliant CEQA analysis became mandatory on July 1, 2020.
2 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 2016. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, Implementing Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013)
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 14
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Regional
Fresno Council of Governments
The Fresno COG is a voluntary association of local governments and a regional planning agency comprised of 16 member jurisdictions, including the City of Fresno. The members are represented by a Policy Board consisting of mayors of each incorporated city, and the Chairman of the County Board of Supervisors, or their designated elected official. The Fresno COG’s purpose is to establish a consensus on the needs of the Fresno County area and further action plans for issues related to the Fresno County region. The current regional transportation plan, known as the Fresno County Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) (2042), was adopted in 2018. The RTP addresses GHG emissions reductions and other air emissions related to transportation, with the goal of preparing for future growth in a sustainable way.
The plan specifies how funding will be sourced and financed for the region’s planned transportation investments, ongoing operations, and maintenance. The goals, objectives, and policies of the RTP are established to direct the courses of action that will provide efficient, integrated multimodal transportation systems to serve the mobility needs of people, including accessible pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and freight, while fostering economic prosperity and development, and minimizing mobile sources of air pollution. These goals, objectives, and policies are organized into six categories:
• General Transportation;
• Highway, Streets, and Roads;
• Mass Transportation;
• Aviation;
• Active Transportation; and
• Rail
Fresno County Congestion Management Process
In June 1990, California voters approved legislation that required Congestion Management Plans (CMP) be developed in urbanized counties to address congestion on California’s highways and roads.
The Fresno County Congestion Management Process (CMP) implements this requirement and its responsibilities include providing information on transportation system performance and assess alternative strategies for alleviating congestion and improving mobility for people and goods to levels that meet State and local needs. The Fresno County CMP identifies four general objectives:
1. Optimize the transportation facilities through efficient system management;
2. Invest in strategies that reduce travel demand, improve system performance, increase safety, and provide effective incident management;
3. Reduce VMT by encouraging alternative modes of transportation and promotion of sustainable land use development; and
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 15
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
4. improve public transit, extend bicycle and pedestrian systems, and promote car‐sharing and bike‐sharing programs to facilitate the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system in the Fresno region
Local
City of Fresno 2035 General Plan
The City of Fresno adopted the Fresno 2035 General Plan3in December 2014 as an update to the previous Fresno General Plan approved in 2002. It serves as the City’s guide for the continued development, enhancement, and revitalization of the Fresno metropolitan area. The following policies related to transportation and circulation are applicable to the Project:
• Policy MT-1-d - Integrate Land Use and Transportation Planning. Plan for and maintain a coordinated and well-integrated land use pattern, local circulation network and transportation system that accommodates planned growth, reduces impacts on adjacent land uses, and preserves the integrity of established neighborhoods.
• Policy MT-1-f - Match Travel Demand with Transportation Facilities. Designate the types and intensities of land uses at locations such that related travel demands can be accommodated by a variety of viable transportation modes and support Complete Neighborhoods while avoiding the rerouting of excessive or incompatible traffic through local residential streets. • Policy MT-1-g - Complete Streets Concept Implementation. Provide transportation facilities based upon a Complete Streets concept that facilitates the balanced use of all viable travel modes (pedestrians, bicyclists, motor vehicle and transit users), meeting the transportation needs of all ages, income groups, and abilities and providing mobility for a variety of trip purposes, while also supporting other City goals.
• Policy MT-1-m - Standards for Planned Bus Rapid Transit Corridors and Activity Centers.
Independent of the Traffic Impact Zones identified in MT-2-I and Figure MT-4, strive to maintain the following vehicle LOS standards on major roadway segments and intersections along Bus Rapid Transit Corridors and in Activity Centers:
o LOS E or better at all times, including peak travel times, unless the City Traffic Engineer determines that mitigation to maintain this LOS would be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement of other General Plan policies.
o Accept LOS F conditions in Activity Centers and Bus Rapid Transit Corridors only if provisions are made to improve the overall system and/or promote non-vehicular transportation and transit as part of a development project or a City-initiated project.
In accepting LOS F conditions, the City Traffic Engineer may request limited analyses of 3 City of Fresno General Plan 2035, December 18, 2014.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 16
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
operational issues at locations near Activity Centers and along Bus Rapid Transit Corridors, such as queuing or left-turn movements.
o Give priority to maintaining pedestrian service first, followed by transit service and then by vehicle LOS, where conflicts between objectives for service capacity between different transportation modes occur.
o Identify pedestrian-priority and transit-priority streets where these modes would have priority in order to apply a multi-modal priority system, as part of the General Plan implementation
• Policy MT-2-b - Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Trips. Partner with major employers and other responsible agencies, such the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and the Fresno Council of Governments, to implement trip reduction strategies, such as eTRIP, to reduce total vehicle miles traveled and the total number of daily and peak hour vehicle trips, thereby making better use of the existing transportation system. • Policy MT-2-c - Reduce VMT through Infill Development. Provide incentives for infill development that would provide jobs and services closer to housing and multi-modal transportations corridors in order to reduce citywide vehicle miles travelled (VMT). • Policy MT-2-d - Street Redesign where Excess Capacity Exists. Evaluate opportunities to reduce right of way and/or redesign streets to support non-automobile travel modes along streets with excess roadway capacity where adjacent land use is not expected to change over the planning period
• Policy MT-2-e - Driveway and Access Consolidation. Take advantage of opportunities to consolidate driveways, access points, and curb cuts along designated major roadways when a change in development or a change in intensity occurs or when traffic operation or safety warrants
• Policy MT-2-f - Optimization of Roadway Operations. Optimize roadway operations by continuing to expand the use of techniques such as the City’s intelligent transportation system (ITS) to manage traffic signal timing coordination in order to improve traffic operations and increase traffic-carrying capacity, while reducing unnecessary congestion and decreasing air pollution emissions. In order to facilitate roadway optimization and as a potential revenue source for the optimization, the following strategies need to be implemented:
o Dig Once Policy. Install conduit for telecommunications use when trenching or construction occurs.
o Telecommunications Strategy. Develop a costing mechanism for allowing the use of excess conduit within the City for use by communication carriers. The Policy shall follow regulations of the California Public Utilities Commission. o Grant Funding. Pursue grant funding to assist in construction and/or implementation of fiber-optic or other telecommunication infrastructure for additional public services such as education, economic development, reaching underserved populations, and public safety communications.
• Policy MT-2-g - Transportation Demand Management and Transportation System Management. Pursue implementation of Transportation Demand Management and Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 17
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
Transportation System Management strategies to reduce peak hour vehicle traffic and supplement the capacity of the transportation system.
• Policy MT-2-i - Transportation Impact Studies. Require a Transportation Impact Study (currently named Traffic Impact Study) to assess the impacts of new development projects on existing and planned streets for projects meeting one or more of the following criteria, unless it is determined by the City Traffic Engineer that the project site and surrounding area already has appropriate multi-modal infrastructure improvements.
o When a project includes a General Plan amendment that changes the General Plan Land Use Designation.
o When the project will substantially change the off-site transportation system (auto, transit, bike or pedestrian) or connection to the system, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer.
o Transportation impact criteria are tiered based on a project’s location within the City’s Sphere of Influence. This is to assist with areas being incentivized for development. The four zones, as defined on Figure MT-4, are listed below. The following criteria apply:
▪ Traffic Impact Zone I (TIZ-I): TIZ-I represents the Downtown Planning Area.
Maintain a peak hour LOS standard of F or better for all intersections and roadway segments. A TIS will be required for all development projected to generate 200 or more peak hour new vehicle trips.
▪ Traffic Impact Zone II (TIZ-II): TIZ-II generally represents areas of the City currently built up and wanting to encourage infill development. Maintain a peak hour LOS standard of E or better for all intersections and roadway segments. A TIS will be required for all development projected to generate 200 or more peak hour new vehicle trips.
▪ Traffic Impact Zone III (TIZ-III): TIZ-III generally represents areas near or outside the City Limits but within the SOI as of December 31, 2012. Maintain a peak hour LOS standard of D or better for all intersections and roadway segments. A TIS will be required for all development projected to generate 100 or more peak hour new vehicle trips.
▪ Traffic Impact Zone IV (TIZ-IV): TIZ-IV represents the southern employment areas within and planned by the City. Maintain a peak hour LOS standard of E or better for all intersections and roadway segments. A TIZ will be required for all development projected to generate 200 or more peak hour new vehicle trips. • Policy MT-2-l - Region-Wide Transportation Impact Fees. Continue to support the implementation of metropolitan-wide and region-wide transportation impact fees sufficient to cover the proportional share of a development's impacts and need for a comprehensive multimodal transportation system that is not funded by other sources. Work with the Council of Fresno County Governments, transportation agencies (e.g., Caltrans, Federal Transportation Agency) and other jurisdictions in the region to develop a method for determining:
o Regional transportation impacts of new development;
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 18
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
o Regional highways, streets, rail, trails, public transportation, and goods movement system components, consistent with the General Plan, necessary to mitigate those impacts and serve projected demands;
o Projected full lifetime costs of the regional transportation system components, including construction, operation, and maintenance; and o Costs covered by established funding sources.
• Policy MT-4-b - Bikeway Improvements. Establish and implement property development standards to assure that projects adjacent to designated bikeways provide adequate right-ofway and that necessary improvements are constructed to implement the planned bikeway system shown on Figure MT-2 to provide for bikeways, to the extent feasible, when existing roadways are reconstructed; and alternative bikeway alignments or routes where inadequate right-of-way is available.
• Policy MT-4-d - Prioritization of Bikeway Improvements. Prioritize bikeway components that link existing separated sections of the system, or that are likely to serve the highest concentration of existing or potential cyclists, particularly in those neighborhoods with low vehicle ownership rates, or that are likely to serve destination areas with the highest demand such as schools, shopping areas, recreational and park areas, and employment centers • Policy MT-5-a - Sidewalk Development. Pursue funding and implement standards for development of sidewalks on public streets, with priority given to meeting the needs of persons with physical and vision limitations; providing safe routes to school; completing pedestrian improvements in established neighborhoods with lower vehicle ownership rates; or providing pedestrian access to public transportation routes
• Policy MT-5-b - Sidewalk Requirements. Assure adequate access for pedestrians and people with disabilities in new residential developments per adopted City policies, consistent with the California Building Code and the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Policy MT-5-d - Pedestrian Safety. Minimize vehicular and pedestrian conflicts on both major and non-roadways through implementation of traffic access design and control standards addressing street intersections, median island openings and access driveways to facilitate accessibility while reducing congestion and increasing safety. Increase safety and accessibility for pedestrians with vision disabilities through the installation of Accessible Pedestrian Signals at signalized intersections
• Policy MT-5-e - Traffic Management in Established Neighborhoods. Establish acceptable design and improvement standards and provide traffic planning assistance to established neighborhoods to identify practical traffic management and calming methods to enhance the pedestrian environment with costs equitably assigned to properties receiving the benefits or generating excessive vehicle traffic
• Policy MT-6-g - Path and Trail Development. Require all projects to incorporate planned multipurpose path and trail development standards and corridor linkages consistent with the General Plan, applicable law and case-by-case determinations as a condition of project approval Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 19
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
• Policy MT-8-a - Street Design Coordinated with Transit. Coordinate the planning, design, and construction of the major roadway network with transit operators to facilitate efficient direct transit routing throughout the Planning Area.
• Policy MT-8-c - New Development Facilitating Transit. Continue to review development proposals in transportation corridors to ensure they are designed to facilitate transit.
Coordinate all projects that have residential or employment densities suitable for transit services, so they are located along existing or planned transit corridors or that otherwise have the potential for transit orientation to FAX, and consider FAX’s comments in decision-making • Policy MT-11-c - Truck Route Designations. Continue to plan and designate truck routes within the Metropolitan Area to facilitate access to and from goods production and processing areas while minimizing conflicts with other transportation priorities The General Plan also has policies related to maintaining acceptable Levels of Service (LOS). However, LOS can no longer be used for CEQA evaluations and is therefore not relevant to this memorandum focusing on CEQA impacts. Additional analyses of the Specific Plan will be documented in another report that will detail LOS.
City of Fresno Active Transportation Plan
The City of Fresno Active Transportation Plan (ATP)4is a comprehensive guide that creates a vision for active transportation in the City of Fresno. It is an update to the City of Fresno Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trails, Master Plan that was adopted in 2010. This plan lays out specific goals to improve bicycle access and connectivity in Fresno. These goals include the following:
• Equitably improve the safety and perceived safety of walking and bicycling in Fresno; • Increase walking and bicycling trips in Fresno by creating user friendly facilities; • Improve the geographical equity of access to walking and bicycling facilities in Fresno; and • Fill key gaps in Fresno’s walking and bicycling networks.
City of Fresno ADA Transition Plan for the Right of Way (ROW) On February 25, 2016 the City Council adopted the 2016 Update to the ADA Transition Plan for the Right of Way (ROW). The ROW Transition Plan incorporates retrofitting Curb Ramps, Sidewalks, and Accessible Pedestrian Signals and replaces the 2003 Amended Curb Ramp Transition Plan. The goal of the ADA Transition Plan for the ROW is to ensure that the City maintains accessible paths of travel in the ROW for people with disabilities.
4 City of Fresno Active Transportation Plan, December 2016.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 20
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
City of Fresno VMT Guidelines
The City of Fresno adopted their VMT guidelines on June 25, 20205. This document serves as a detailed guideline for preparing VMT analysis consistent with SB 743 requirements for development projects, transportation projects, and plans. Key elements of these guidelines include:
• The County of Fresno was selected as the region for assessing VMT impacts. Therefore, all projects will compare their VMT metrics against the county averages. • The guidelines state the following significant thresholds for land development projects in the City of Fresno:
o 13 percent below existing regional average VMT per capita for residential projects o 13 percent below existing regional average VMT per employee for office projects o No net increase in VMT for retail projects.
• For land use plans such as specific plans and general plans, the guidelines compare the existing VMT per capita and/or VMT per employee for the region with the expected horizon year VMT per capita and/or VMT per employee for the land use plan. If there is a net increase in the applicable VMT metrics (VMT/capita and VMT/employee) under horizon year conditions, then the project will have a significant impact.
5 https://www.fresno.gov/darm/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2020/06/CEQA-Guidelines-for-Vehicle-Miles-TraveledThresholds-June-18-2020-DRAFT.pdf Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 21
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
The transportation analysis assesses how the study area’s transportation system would operate with the implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. This analysis includes effects that would result in significant impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines.
CEQA Significance Criteria
The Project’s impact is not considered to be significant unless it would:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guideline section 15064.3, subdivision (b). c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). d. Result in inadequate emergency access.
Significance criteria “b” is related to the implementation of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary performance metric. The following criteria are used to assess a significant impact related to VMT consistent with the City of Fresno “CEQA Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled Thresholds” dated June 25, 2020:
• A proposed (residential) project exceeding a level of 13 percent below existing regional average6 VMT per capita may indicate a significant transportation impact. • A similar threshold would apply to office projects (13 percent below existing regional average VMT per employee).
• VMT generated by retail projects would indicate a significant impact for any net increase in total VMT.
• Section 6 of the VMT guidelines includes Significance Criteria for Specific Plans: For land use plans such as the Specific Plan for the West Area, the recommended methodology for conducting VMT assessments is to compare the existing VMT per capita and/or VMT per employee for the region with the expected horizon year VMT per capita and/or VMT per employee for the land use plan. If there is a net increase in the VMT metric under horizon year conditions, then the project will have a significant impact. 6 The City of Fresno defines the region for applying these threshold as Fresno County Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 22
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
VMT Analysis
The Fresno Council of Governments’ (COG) Activity Based travel demand model was used to estimate existing and horizon year average VMT per capita and VMT per employee for the traffic analysis zones (TAZs) that comprise the Specific Plan Area and Fresno County. The number of dwelling units and employment for the Specific Plan Area were calculated at buildout and provided to Fresno COG. Fresno COG used the buildout numbers to run a population synthesizer to generate land use input files for running the activity-based model. These land use input files were then run through the activity-based model to develop horizon year (2035) forecasts with the buildout of the Specific Plan Area.
Table 2 presents VMT per capita and VMT per employee findings for existing conditions in Fresno County and for the Specific Plan Area at buildout in the horizon year. Based on the City of Fresno VMT Guidelines, a specific plan would have a significant impact if the VMT per capita and VMT per employee of the Specific Plan Area exceeded the same metrics for existing conditions in all of Fresno County.
As Table 2 shows, the VMT per capita and VMT per employee in the Specific Plan Area are lower than existing conditions. VMT per capita is 7.4 lower or 46% while VMT per employee is 12.4 lower or 48%.
The decrease in VMT is the result of the land use mix within the Specific Plan Area. The retail and employment opportunities keep the VMT per capita lower than the County average while the large number of dwelling units near the jobs allows employees to live close to work resulting in a VMT per employee that is lower than the County average today.
Table 2: VMT per Capita and VMT per Employee - Existing and Horizon Year Conditions Trip Type Fresno County (2019) Specific Plan Area (2035) Difference (%) VMT Per Capita 16.1 8.7 -7.4 (46%)
VMT Per Employee 25.6 13.2 -12.4 (48%)
Note: These numbers are based on Fresno COG’s Activity-Based Travel Demand Model, and the Land Use inputs obtained for horizon year 2035 from Fresno COG (assuming full buildout of the Fresno West area outlined in the specific plan) Source: Fresno COG Travel Demand Model, Kittelson & Associates, 2020.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 23
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
CEQA PROJECT IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATIONS
TRAF-1 The proposed project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. This would be considered a less than significant impact.
Development associated with the proposed Plan would increase the amount of multimodal transportation activity which would require the improvement and expansion of the local transportation network in the Specific Plan Area to serve the associated travel demand. The Specific Plan of the West Area Initiation Report includes the following guiding principles related to transit, bicycle and pedestrian travel:
• Accommodate and improve roadway access, connectivity and mobility among all modes of transportation, and prioritize roadway widening where bottlenecks exists. • Accommodate planned transit services in the West Area by locating routes near or adjacent to the community centers, schools, parks, and retail centers.
These guiding principles are consistent with General Plan policies which detail how the circulation system will be improved to meet the needs of all users. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would promote the use of alternative transportation modes by accelerating development in the West Area which would in turn require development of a circulation system that address all user. General Plan policies that would have to followed to build out the Specific Plan and address transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian travel are:
• Policy MT-1-g - Complete Streets Concept Implementation. o Requires transportation facilities be based upon a Complete Streets concept that facilitates the balanced use of all viable travel modes (pedestrians, bicyclists, motor vehicle and transit users), meeting the transportation needs of all ages, income groups, and abilities and providing mobility for a variety of trip purposes, while also supporting other City goals
• Policy MT-1-m - Standards for Planned Bus Rapid Transit Corridors and Activity Centers. o Requires intersections and roadways along transit corridor and in activity centers maintain acceptable operations to facilitate transit movement. • Policy MT-2-d - Street Redesign where Excess Capacity Exists. o Requires roadways with extra capacity to be modified to “right size” the roadway. • Policy MT-4-b - Bikeway Improvements.
o Requires new development to set aside an adequate amount of right of way to construct bicycle facilities.
• Policy MT-4-d - Prioritization of Bikeway Improvements.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 24
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
o Prioritizes connections between existing facilities to complete a comprehensive bicycle network.
• Policy MT-5-a - Sidewalk Development.
o Establishs a goal of developing sidewalks to improve connectivity to transit • Policy MT-5-b - Sidewalk Requirements.
o Requires sidewalks to be constricted to the latest standards • Policy MT-6-g - Path and Trail Development.
o Requires planned multi use paths be constructed along with new development • Policy MT-8-a - Street Design Coordinated with Transit o Requires coordination with roadway design and transit to ensure an efficient public transportation system
• Policy MT-8-c - New Development Facilitating Transit. o Requires new development to facilitate transit.
Additionally, the Specific Plan has a strong emphasis on Complete Neighborhoods, which is a tool to achieve environmental justice. The concept of Complete Neighborhoods is to enable residents of Fresno to live in communities with convenient access to services, employment, and recreation within walking distance. It provides residents with amenities that make their neighborhood mostly self-sufficient and interconnected. According to the Specific Plan, planning for Complete Neighborhoods will help support the provision of resources to neighborhoods where they are currently lacking or are under-resourced. Section 5.4 of the Specific Plan includes a series of maps which show a reasonable walkshed from existing and planned schools; bus stops and trails; commercial uses; and parks and open space.
Since the guiding principles of the Specific Plan support the policies of the General Plan, no conflict with policies, plans, and programs for alternative transportation would occur from future development and redevelopment under the proposed Specific Plan of the West Area. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required.
TRAF-2 The proposed project would conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guideline section 15064.3, subdivision (b). This would be considered a potentially significant impact.
The Fresno COG Activity Based travel demand model was used to estimate existing and horizon year average VMT per capita and VMT per employee for the traffic analysis zones (TAZs) that comprise the Specific Plan Area and Fresno County. The number of dwelling units and employment for the Specific Plan Area were calculated at buildout and provided to Fresno COG. Fresno COG used the buildout numbers to run a population synthesizer to generate land use input files for running the activity-based Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 25
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
model. These land use input files were then run through the activity-based model to develop horizon year (2035) forecasts with the buildout of the Specific Plan Area.
Table 3 presents VMT per capita and VMT per employee findings for existing conditions in Fresno County and for the Plan Area at buildout in the horizon year. Based on the City of Fresno VMT Guidelines, a specific plan would have a significant impact if the VMT per capita and VMT per employee of the Specific Plan Area exceeded the same metrics for existing conditions in all of Fresno County.
Table 3: VMT PER CAPITA AND VMT PER EMPLOYEE - EXISTING AND HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS
TRIP TYPES
FRESNO COUNTY
(2019)
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
(2035)
DIFFERENCE
(%)
VMT Per Capita 16.1 8.7 -7.4 (46%)
VMT Per Employee 25.6 13.2 -12.4 (48%)
NOTE: THESE NUMBERS ARE BASED ON FRESNO COG’S ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL, AND THE LAND USE INPUTS OBTAINED FOR HORIZON YEAR 2035 FROM FRESNO COG (ASSUMING FULL BUILDOUT OF THE FRESNO WEST AREA OUTLINED IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN).
SOURCE: FRESNO COG TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL, AND KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2020.
As Table 3 shows, the projected VMT per capita and VMT per employee in the Plan Area are lower than existing conditions. Under the Specific Plan, VMT per capita is 7.4 lower, or 46% lower, while VMT per employee is 12.4 lower, or 48% lower. The decrease in VMT is the result of the proposed land use mix within the Plan Area. The retail and employment opportunities keep the VMT per capita lower than the County average, while the large number of dwelling units near the jobs allows employees to live close to work resulting in a VMT per employee that is lower than the County average today.
CONCLUSION
The City of Fresno VMT Guidelines state specific plans would have an impact if the VMT per capita or VMT per employee in the specific plan area for the horizon year increases compared to the existing VMT per capita or VMT per employee in the region (Fresno County). The VMT per capita in the Specific Plan Area during the horizon year is 8.7, while VMT per employee is 13.2. Under existing conditions in Fresno County, the VMT per capita is 16.1, while the VMT per employee is 25.6. Because the VMT per capita and VMT per employee in the Specific Plan Area during the horizon year is less than the VMT per capita and VMT per employee for existing conditions in Fresno County, the proposed Specific Plan would not result in a significant impact for residential and office projects. Therefore, impacts related to CEQA Guideline section 15064.3, subdivision (b), would be less than significant.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 26
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
TRAF-3 The proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). This would be considered a less than significant impact.
The Specific Plan is proposing to increase the density in the plan area compared to the City’s General Plan but is not proposing to change the types (i.e., residential, commercial, office, etc.) of land uses in the area. The Specific Plan of the West Area Initiation Report includes the following guiding principals related to transportation and hazards:
• Provide a complete, safe, and well-maintained sidewalk network from residential neighborhoods to commercial centers, schools, parks, and community centers. • Provide a complete, safe, and well-maintained roadway network that allows for efficient and smooth access from the West Area to other sections of the city and region.
Buildout of the proposed Specific Plan would result in some changes to the City’s circulation network, but would not increase hazards or incompatible uses due to design features. All future roadway system improvements associated with development and redevelopment activates under the Specific Plan would be designed in accordance with the established roadway design standards, some of which have also been incorporated into the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
General Plan policies that would address design and safety issues are:
• Policy MT-2-e - Driveway and Access Consolidation.
• Policy MT-2-i - Transportation Impact Studies.
• Policy MT-5-d - Pedestrian Safety.
• Policy MT-5-e - Traffic Management in Established Neighborhoods These improvements will be subject to review and future consideration by the City of Fresno. An evaluation of the roadway alignments, intersection geometrics, and traffic control features will be needed. Roadway improvements would have to be made in accordance with the City’s Circulation Plan, roadway functional design guidelines, and would have to meet design guidelines such as th accessibility requirements of Title 24 (California Building Code), ADA standards, California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and the Caltrans Roadway Design Manual.
Implementation of the Specific Plan would not result in hazardous conditions, or create conflicting uses.
With implementation of policies MT-2-e, MT-2-I, and application of the conditions of approval at the time of review of land development projects, the Specific Plan would be designed to ensure that no hazardous circulation conditions are created as a result of implementation of the proposed project. The Specific Plan would implement components of the roadway system consistent with the City’s General Plan. Therefore, potential impactsrelated to hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required.
Fresno Specific Plan of the West Area Project #: 23674
March 9, 2021 Page 27
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California
TRAF-4 The proposed project would result in inadequate emergency access. This would be considered a less than significant impact.
Emergency response requires a balance of emergency response time and evacuation needs with other community concerns, such as urban design and traffic calming. Future roadway improvements associated with buildout of the Plan Area would be made in accordance with the City’s Circulation Plan and roadway functional design guidelines.
With the application of the conditions of approval at the time of review of land development projects, the Specific Plan would be designed to ensure that adequate emergency access is provided. The Specific Plan would implement components of the roadway system consistent with the City’s General Plan.
Therefore, impacts related to inadequate emergency access would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required.
Exhibit R - Attachment 2:
Findings of Fact and Statement
of Overriding Considerations
FINDING OF FACT / STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATION
FOR THE
WEST AREA NEIGHBORHOODS SPECIFIC PLAN
(SCH: 2019069117)
MAY 2022
Prepared for:
City of Fresno
Planning and Development Department
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065
Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 621-8003
Prepared by:
De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
(916) 580-9818
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
FINDING OF FACT / STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION
FOR THE
WEST AREA NEIGHBORHOODS SPECIFIC PLAN
(SCH: 2019069117)
MAY 2022
Prepared for:
City of Fresno
Planning and Development Department
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065
Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 621-8003
Prepared by:
De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, Suite 106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
(916) 580-9818
TABLE OF CONTENTS TOC
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan TOC-1
FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Section Page Number
I. Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 II. General Findings and Overview.......................................................................................... 2 III. Findings and Recommendations Regarding Significant and Unavoidable Impacts............ 7 IV. Findings and Recommendations Regarding Significant Impacts Which Are Mitigated to a Less than Significant Level ............................................................................................. 31 V. Findings and Recommendations Regarding Those Impacts Which are Less Than Significant or Less Than Cumulatively Considerable ........................................................ 52 VI. Project Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 54 VII. Statements of Overriding Considerations Related to the West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan Findings........................................................................................................ 60
TOC TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOC-2 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan This page left intentionally blank.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 1
FINDINGS FOR THE
WEST AREA NEIGHBORHOODS SPECIFIC PLAN
REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Public Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)
I. INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) requires the City of Fresno (City), as the CEQA lead agency, to: 1) make written findings when it approves a project for which an environmental impact report (EIR) was certified, and 2) identify overriding considerations for significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the EIR. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21081.)
This document explains the City’s findings regarding the significant and potentially significant impacts identified in the environmental impact report (EIR) prepared for the West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan (Specific Plan or Project) and the City decision-makers’ ultimate determinations of the feasibility of the project alternatives considered in the EIR. The statement of overriding considerations in Section VII, below, identifies the economic, social, technical, and other benefits of the Project that the City decision-makers have determined should override any significant environmental impacts that would result from the Project.
As required under CEQA, the Final EIR describes the Project, adverse environmental impacts of the Project, and mitigation measures and alternatives that would substantially reduce or avoid those impacts. The information and conclusions contained in the EIR reflect the City’s independent judgment.
The Final EIR (which includes the Draft EIR, comments, responses to comments, and revisions to the Draft EIR) for the Project, examined the proposed Project and several alternatives to the Project including: (1) No Project (Existing General Plan) Alternative; (2) Regional Park Alternative; and Lower Density Alternative.
The Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations are presented for adoption by the City Council, as the City’sfindings under CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., title 14, § 15000 et seq.) relating to the Project. The Findings provide the written analysis, substantial evidence, and conclusions of this City Council regarding the Project’s environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives to the Project, as well as the overriding considerations, which in this City Council’s view, justify approval of the Project, despite its environmental effects.
CEQA FINDINGS
2 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan II. GENERAL FINDINGS AND OVERVIEW
Project Overview
The West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan (also-known-as “Specific Plan”, “Plan Area”) encompasses approximately 7,077 acres (or a little more than 11 square miles) in the City of Fresno city limits and unincorporated Fresno County. The footprint of the Specific Plan is referred to as the “Plan Area.” Of the eleven square miles within the Plan Area, 6.9 square miles are in the city limits and 4.1 square miles are in the growth area. The growth area is land outside the city limits but within the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) boundary, which is the adopted limit for future growth.
The proposed Specific Plan will establish the land use planning and regulatory guidance, including the land use and zoning designations and policies, for the approximately 7,077-acre Plan Area. The Specific Plan will serve as a bridge between the Fresno General Plan and individual development applications in the Plan Area.
The proposed Specific Plan refines the General Plan’s land use vision for the Plan Area. The draft land use map proposes the relocation of higher density land uses away from the most western and southwestern portions of the Plan Area where they are distant from public transit and community amenities and transfers those higher density land use designations to major corridors. The West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan land use plan utilizes the City’s existing General Plan land use designations to maintain or re-designate some parcels in the Plan Area. See Table 2.0-1 for a summary of the existing and proposed land uses within the city limits, growth area, and Plan Area.
See Figure 2.0-6 for the proposed General Plan land use designations.
The parcels that are currently within the County will not be rezoned. Instead, upon a proposal to annex unincorporated land into the city limits, the City of Fresno would pre-zone the land to a zone that is consistent with the General Plan land use. Once annexation occurs, the County zoning would no longer apply to the parcel.
The Specific Plan land use plan that was recommended by the Steering Committee would allow for the future development of up to 54,953 dwelling units (DU) (including 67 DU in the commercial category, 47,072 DU in the residential category and 7,814 DU in the mixed use category), and 60,621,006 square feet (SF) of non-residential uses. The proposed land use plan also designates public facility uses that are currently existing within the Plan Area, including schools and churches.
In the northern portion of the Plan Area, Fire Station No. 18 is temporarily located off of West Bullard Avenue at 5938 North La Ventana Avenue. Fire Station 18 will be relocated to a permanent location on the south side of the 6000 block of West Shaw Avenue to maximize the department’s response time goal. Additionally, the proposed land use plan would allow for approximately 248 acres of park, open space, and ponding basin uses. The Specific Plan also includes circulation and utility improvements, some of which are planned in the City’s current program for capital improvements.
Refer to EIR Chapter 2.0, Project Description, for a more complete description of the details of the proposed Specific Plan.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 3
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Notice of Preparation Public Circulation: The City circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an EIR for the proposed project on June 28, 2019 to responsible and trustee agencies, the State Clearinghouse, and the public. A public scoping meeting was held on July 24, 2019 at 6:00 p.m., at the Glacier Point Middle School Cafeteria in Fresno to present the project description to the public and interested agencies, and to receive comments from the public and interested agencies regarding the scope of the environmental analysis to be included in the Draft EIR. Concerns raised in response to the NOP were considered during preparation of the Draft EIR. The NOP and responses to the NOP by interested parties are presented in Appendix A of the Draft EIR. The commenting individuals and agencies are provided below.
1. April Henry (August 1, 2019)
2. California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (July 19, 2019)
3. California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit (June 28, 2019)
4. Carl & Lydia Franklin (August 2, 2019)
5. Cathy Caples (August 1, 2019)
6. Central Grizzlies Youth Football & Cheer (August 2, 2019)
7. City of Fresno Transportation Department, Fresno Area Express (July 29, 2019)
8. Forgotten Fresno (July 17, 2019)
9. Fresno Metropolitan Floor Control District (August 1, 2019)
10. Fresno County Public Library (July 8, 2019)
11. Jeff Roberts (July 24, 2019)
12. Patricia and Clifford Upton (July 24, 2019)
13. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (July 15, 2019) Notice of Availability and Draft EIR: The City published a public Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft EIR on February 10, 2022 inviting comment from the general public, agencies, organizations, and other interested parties. The NOA was filed with the State Clearinghouse (SCH # 2019069117) and the County Clerk, and was published in a local newspaper pursuant to the public noticing requirements of CEQA. The Draft EIR was available for public review and comment from February 10, 2022 through March 28, 2022.
The Draft EIR contains a description of the Project, description of the environmental setting, identification of Project impacts, and mitigation measures for impacts found to be significant, as well as an analysis of Project alternatives, identification of significant irreversible environmental changes, growth-inducing impacts, and cumulative impacts. The Draft EIR identifies issues determined to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, and provides detailed analysis of potentially significant and significant impacts. Comments received in response to the NOP were considered in preparing the analysis in the Draft EIR.
Final EIR: The City of Fresno received nine comment letters on the Draft EIR during the public review period. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15088, the Final EIR responds to the comments
CEQA FINDINGS
4 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan received during the public review period. The Final EIR also contains minor edits to the Draft EIR, which are included in Chapter 3.0, Revisions.
The comments received did not provide evidence of any new significant impacts or “significant new information” that would require recirculation of the Draft EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORD
For purposes of CEQA and the findings set forth herein, the record of proceedings for the City’s findings and determinations consists of the following documents and testimony, at a minimum:
• The NOP, comments received on the NOP, and all other public notices issued by the City in relation to the Project (e.g., NOA).
• The Draft EIR and Final EIR, including comment letters, and technical materials cited in the documents.
• All non-draft and/or non-confidential reports and memoranda prepared by the City and consultants in relation to the EIR.
• Minutes and transcripts of the discussions regarding the Project and/or Project components at public hearings held by the City.
• Staff reports associated with City Council meetings on the Project. • Those categories of materials identified in Public Resources Code § 21167.6(e).
The City Clerk is the custodian of the administrative record. The documents and materials that constitute the administrative record are available for review at the City of Fresno Planning & Development, 2600 Fresno St., Rm. 3045, Fresno, CA 93721 or online at:
https://www.fresno.gov/westareaplan.
FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA
Public Resources Code § 21002 provides that “public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]” Further, the procedures required by CEQA “are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects.” (Id.) Section 21002 also provides that “in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof.”
The mandate and principles established by the Legislature in Public Resources Code § 21002 are implemented, in part, through the requirement in Public Resources Code § 21081 that agencies must adopt findings before approving projects for which an EIR is required.
CEQA Guidelines § 15091 provides the following direction regarding findings:
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 5 (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are:
(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR.
(2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.
(3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
(See also Public Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (a)(1)-(3).) As defined by CEQA, “feasible” means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, legal, and technological factors. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; see also CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(f)(1) [determining the feasibility of alternatives].) The concept of “feasibility” also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (See Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1400 [court upholds findings rejecting a “reduced herd” alternative to a proposed dairy as infeasible because the alternative failed to meet the “fundamental objective” of the project to produce milk]; Sierra Club v. County of Napa (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 1490, 1506-1508 [agency decision-makers, in rejecting alternatives as infeasible, appropriately relied on project objective articulated by project applicant].) Moreover, “‘feasibility’ under CEQA encompasses ‘desirability’ to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, legal, and technological factors.” (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; see also California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1001-1002.)
With respect to a project for which significant impacts cannot be feasibly avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons that the project’s benefits outweigh its significant unavoidable adverse environmental effects. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21001, 21002.1(c), 21081(b).)
CEQA Guidelines § 15093 provides the following direction regarding a statement of overriding considerations:
CEQA FINDINGS
6 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan (a) CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region-wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered “acceptable.”
(b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to § 15091.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared for the Project and, if the Project is approved, will be adopted concurrently with these Findings. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21081.6, subd. (a)(1).) The City will use the Mitigation Monitoring Program to track compliance with Project mitigation measures.
CONSIDERATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
In adopting these Findings, this City Council finds that the Final EIR was presented to this City Council, the decision-making body of the lead agency, which reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR prior to approving the Project. By these findings, this City Council ratifies, adopts, and incorporates the analysis, explanation, findings, responses to comments, and conclusions of the Final EIR. The City Council finds that the Final EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA. The Final EIR represents the independent judgment of the City.
SEVERABILITY
If any term, provision, or portion of these Findings or the application of these Findings to a particular situation is held by a court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of these Findings, or their application to other actions related to the Project, shall continue in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the City.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 7 III. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT
AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
A. AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES
1. IMPACT 3.1-3: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WOULD RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
EFFECTS OR DEGRADATION OF VISUAL CHARACTER OR QUALITY OF THE SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse effects or degradation of visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings is discussed on pages 3.1-10 and 3.1-11 of the Draft EIR and determined to be significant. (b) Mitigation Measures. No feasible mitigation measures were identified. (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. The western half of the Plan Area is generally more rural and less developed while more developed portions of the Plan Area are along SR 99 and the southeastern portion of the Plan Area. The proposed Plan would result in the conversion of undeveloped land to urban uses, which may contribute to changes in the regional landscape and visual character of the area. In order to reduce visual impacts, development within the Plan Area is required to be consistent with the General Plan, Fresno Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed Specific Plan, which includes development standards in order to ensure quality and cohesive design.
These standards include specifications for building height, massing, and orientation; exterior lighting standards and specifications; and landscaping standards.
Implementation of the design standards would ensure quality design throughout the Plan Area, and result in development that would be internally cohesive while maintaining an aesthetic quality similar to surrounding uses. Thus, development of an existing developed or urbanized site would not conflict with zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality. In addition, a majority of the parcels identified for change are already planned for development in the existing General Plan or contain existing urbanized land uses.
In addition to future development anticipated within the existing City Limits, the Specific Plan anticipates future development in areas outside the existing City limits, but within the City’s SOI. These areas are primarily rural and agricultural lands. Thus, development of these areas with more urbanized uses would alter the visual character of the area from its current conditions. However, as noted above, development within these areas would be in compliance with the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, along with the development standards and guidelines established by the Specific Plan to ensure compatible development and cohesive development that considers the visual character of the specific site and surrounding
CEQA FINDINGS
8 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan uses. Further, the Specific Plan anticipates less urbanized development within the outer portions of the Plan Area and approximately 250 acres of park, recreational, and open space uses which will provide visual relief within the Plan Area. The proposed Specific Plan would also include visual components that would assist in enhancing the appearance of the Plan Area following site development. These improvements may include landscaping improvements such as new street trees, open lawn area and other vegetation landscaping associated with residential and non-residential development. Although compliance with development regulations and guidelines would improve the aesthetic character of the area associated with more urbanized development, existing views provided to the public of vast open space lands would be replaced with more urbanized development. Additionally, public views of expansive rural and agricultural lands that occur to the west of the Plan Area would be limited within the Plan Area due to intervening development conditions.
Overall, the loss of the visual appearance of the existing vacant and open space land in the Plan Area will change the visual character of the area in perpetuity.
Compliance with the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code, and implementation of the proposed Specific Plan’s development regulations would reduce visual impacts to the greatest extent feasible; however, the proposed Plan would permanently convert undeveloped rural, agricultural, and open space areas to urbanized uses. This is considered a significant and unavoidable impact. There is no feasible mitigation available that would reduce this impact to a less than significant level.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with impacts related to degradation of visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
2. IMPACT 4.1: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE CUMULATIVE DEGRADATION OF THE EXISTING VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE REGION. (a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to contribute to the cumulative degradation of the existing visual character of the region is discussed on pages 4.0-5 and
4.0-6 of the Draft EIR.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 9 (b) Mitigation Measures. No feasible mitigation measures were identified. (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. Under cumulative conditions, buildout of the Fresno General Plan would result in changes to the visual character of the Fresno General Plan Planning Area and result in impacts to localized views as new development occurs within the City and the General Plan Planning Area.
Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would change the visual character of the Specific Plan Area by facilitating the development of urban uses within an area largely comprised of undeveloped sites. Regional growth has and will continue to result in a cumulative aesthetic effect by converting undeveloped land into developed and occupied areas and increasing overall levels of nighttime lighting.
Cumulative development entails grading/landform alteration, the development of structures, and the installation of roadways and other infrastructure that has altered and will continue to permanently alter the region's existing visual character.
As described in Section 3.1, compliance with the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code, and implementation of the proposed Specific Plan’s development regulations would reduce visual impacts to the greatest extent feasible; however, the proposed Plan would permanently convert undeveloped rural, agricultural, and open space areas to urbanized uses.
According to the General Plan EIR, buildout of the General Plan would result in the permanent alteration of the visual character of the City of Fresno’s General Plan Planning Area from a more rural setting to a setting that is characterized by suburban or urban uses (i.e., streets, residences, and community commercial shopping centers). In addition, buildout of the General Plan would contribute to cumulatively considerable aesthetic impacts. Consequently, even with implementation of the policies and implementation programs identified in the City’s General Plan, as well as adopted City regulations to enhance the City’s current community character and preserve open space, development of the General Plan area was determined in the General Plan EIR to result in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact to aesthetics. Although the proposed project would comply with all applicable standards and regulations, impacts related to a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, degradation of the existing visual character and quality of the project site and surrounding area, and creation of new sources of light or glare would still occur. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan EIR conclusion, the proposed Specific Plan’s incremental contribution towards cumulative aesthetic impacts would be cumulatively considerable and significant and unavoidable.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as
CEQA FINDINGS
10 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with cumulative impacts related to cumulative degradation of the existing visual character of the region, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
1. IMPACT 3.2-1: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WOULD CONVERT IMPORTANT FARMLANDS TO NON-AGRICULTURAL LAND USES.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to convert Important Farmlands to nonagricultural land uses is discussed on pages 3.2-10 and 3.2-11 of the Draft EIR and determined to be significant.
(b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measure
3.2-1.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. Within the city limits, the Plan Area is currently zoned for urban land uses (i.e., residential single family, multi-family, public and institutional, mixed use and commercial) and proposes zoning changes similar to the existing land uses. Land uses surrounding the Plan Area consist of light industrial, commercial general, commercial highway and auto, open space, single family residential, rural residential, single family residential agricultural, limited agriculture, exclusive agriculture and other similar land uses. The Plan Area is located adjacent to productive agricultural land or lands zoned for agricultural uses, primarily within the County of Fresno limits. Although the Specific Plan anticipates and plans for future annexation and development of this land into the City, annexation is not currently proposed. The timing of future annexation proposals is not currently known. At the time of annexation proposals, the land proposed for annexation and development would be reviewed to determine if important farmlands would be converted to non-agricultural land uses or result in a conflict with lands zoned for agricultural uses. If future annexation and development would involve the loss of important farmlands to non-agricultural uses, implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2-1 would be required.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 11 While implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2-1 would reduce the aboveidentified impact through preservation of agricultural land at a 1:1 ratio, the impact would not be reduced to a less-than-significant level due to the fact that active agricultural land would still be permanently converted to urban uses. Consistent with the Fresno General Plan EIR, feasible mitigation measures do not exist to reduce the above impact to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with conversion Important Farmlands to non-agricultural land uses, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
2. IMPACT 3.2-2: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WOULD CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ZONING FOR AGRICULTURAL USE, OR A WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract is discussed on pages 3.2-11 and 3.2-12 of the Draft EIR and determined to be significant.
(b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measure
3.2-2.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. The Planning Area includes approximately 120 acres of lands that are under a Williamson Act Contract. Of the 120 acres of Williamson Act Contract land, approximately 56 acres are under Williamson Act Contract-Non-Renewal; thus, at the end of the non-renewal period, the lands would no longer be restricted to agricultural use. The approximately 120 acres are currently designated for medium density residential, urban neighborhood, and open space uses under the Fresno General Plan and those acres within the Fresno city limits are currently designated residential medium density and those acres within the County of Fresno are currently zoned Rural Residential. Agricultural uses are currently permitted in areas designated as rural residential. Under the
CEQA FINDINGS
12 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan proposed Specific Plan, the approximately 120 acres of Williamson Act Contract land are proposed for Low Density, Medium Low Density, and Medium Density Residential where agricultural uses are intended to be transitioned to urban residential uses. The existing agricultural uses can continue to operate, but potentially as legal non‐conforming land uses. However, future revisions to the zoning map related to agricultural uses would result in a significant impact on existing zoning for agricultural uses because non‐agricultural uses, such as low, medium low density, and medium density residential would be allowed on the existing Contract land.
The proposed project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure 3.2-1.
However, even after implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2-1, this would be considered a potentially significant impact. As such, Mitigation Measure 3.2-2 would be required, which requires that land zoned for agricultural uses shall be mitigated at a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, future development resulting in the transition of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses would be required to comply with General Plan policies related to the conversion of agricultural land. While implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2-2 would reduce the above-identified impact through preservation of agricultural land at a 1:1 ratio, the impact would not be reduced to a less-than-significant level due to the fact that land zoned for agricultural uses would still be permanently converted to urban uses. Therefore, this would be considered a significant and unavoidable impact. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with conflicts with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
3. IMPACT 4.2: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MAY CONTRIBUTE TO THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND AND USES.
(b) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to have a cumulative impact on agricultural land and uses is discussed on pages 4 .0-6 of the Draft EIR. (b) Mitigation Measures. No feasible mitigation measures were identified.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 13 (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. Cumulative development anticipated in the City and County of Fresno, including growth projected by adopted general plans and those being updated, will result in the permanent loss of agricultural land, including important farmlands, significant farmlands, land under Williamson Act contracts, and other farmlands.
As described in Section 3.2, Agricultural Resources, there are no forest lands or land designated or zoned as forest land within the Plan Area or surrounding area; therefore, cumulative development would not contribute to the conversion of some forest lands or timber lands. However, there are approximately 285.65 acres of Farmland of Statewide Importance, 509.39 acres of Unique Farmland, and 1,562.82 acres of Farmland of Local Importance within the proposed Specific Plan Area.
Additionally, under the proposed Specific Plan, the approximately 120 acres of Williamson Act Contract land are proposed for Low Density, Medium Low Density, and Medium Density Residential development where agricultural uses are no longer a permitted use. Consequently, adoption of the proposed Specific Plan would result in revisions to the zoning ordinance resulting in a significant impact on existing zoning for agricultural uses because non‐agricultural uses, such as low, medium low density, and medium density residential would be allowed on the existing Contract land.
Agricultural land is a limited resource and the cumulative loss of this land is considered significant. Buildout of the proposed Specific Plan would require the future annexation and development of land into the City. If future annexation and development would involve the loss of important farmlands to non-agricultural uses, implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2-1 would be required. While implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2-1 would reduce the above-identified impact through preservation of agricultural land at a 1:1 ratio, the impact would not be reduced to a less-than-significant level due to the fact that active agricultural land would still be permanently converted to urban uses. Therefore, impacts on Williamson Act contracts, and important or significant farmlands and forest resources remain cumulatively considerable and significant and unavoidable. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project
CEQA FINDINGS
14 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan associated with cumulative impacts to agricultural land and uses, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
C. AIR QUALITY
1. IMPACT 3.3-1: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WOULD CONFLICT WITH OR OBSTRUCT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan is discussed on pages 3.3-35 through
3.3-38 of the Draft EIR and determined to be significant. (b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measure
3.3-1.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. The proposed Specific Plan would generate construction emissions of criteria air pollutants that would exceed San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District (SJVPACD)’s regional construction-phase significance thresholds, which were established to determine whether a project has the potential to cumulatively contribute to the San Joaquin Air Basin (SJVAB)’s nonattainment designations. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan would generate long-term emissions of criteria air pollutants that would exceed SJVAPCD’s regional operation-phase significance thresholds, which were established to determine whether a project has the potential to cumulatively contribute to the SJVAB’s nonattainment designations. Thus, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; cause or contribute to new violations; or delay timely attainment of the Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS).
As discussed above, while the proposed Specific Plan would result in a substantial increase in long-term criteria pollutant emissions compared to existing conditions, it would support a more sustainable development pattern for the Plan Area. As the improvements, objectives, and policies under the proposed Plan would support a more sustainable development pattern in accommodating future growth for the Plan Area, they would contribute to minimizing long-term emissions of criteria air pollutants. Various policies of the proposed Plan would promote complete streets, mixed-use and transit-oriented neighborhoods, and increased capacity for alternative transportation modes, which would help reduce air pollutant emissions.
For example, Specific Plan IPR Goal 1 promotes improved access, movement, and safety for all transportation modes in the Specific Plan, and Policy IPR 1.1 promotes implementation of the Active Transportation Plan and the General Plan to provide
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 15 for complete, safe, and well-maintained sidewalk, bicycle, and trail networks that are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The goals and polices in the Specific Plan would promote active transit and support the reduction in average vehicle trip distances, which would contribute to reducing overall vehicle trips and vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT). However, despite furthering the regional transportation and planning objectives, as stated, buildout of the proposed Plan would represent a substantial increase in emissions compared to existing conditions and would exceed SJVAPCD’s regional operational and construction-related significance thresholds. As a result, the proposed Specific Plan could potentially exceed the assumptions in the Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) and would not be considered consistent with the AQMPs. Therefore, impacts are considered significant.
Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would result in the generation of substantial long-term criteria air pollutant emissions that would exceed the SJVAPCD regional significance thresholds and would therefore not be considered consistent with the existing AQMPs. Future development projects within the Plan Area would be required to implement Mitigation Measure 3.3-1. No further measures to reduce criteria air pollutant emissions are available beyond the applicable SJVAPCD rules and regulations, the proposed Specific Plan goals and policies, and the additional mitigation measures provided under Impact 3.3-2 and Impact 3.3-3. The various goals and policies of the proposed Specific Plan, such as those outlined above, would contribute to reducing long-term criteria air pollutant emissions to the extent feasible. However, due to the magnitude and intensity of development accommodated by the proposed Plan, this impact would have a significant and unavoidable impact relative to this topic. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with conflicts with or obstruction of implementation of the applicable air quality plan, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
CEQA FINDINGS
16 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan
2. IMPACT 3.3-2: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION WOULD
EXPOSE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS TO SUBSTANTIAL POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS OR RESULT IN
A CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE NET INCREASE OF ANY CRITERIA POLLUTANT FOR WHICH THE
PROJECT REGION IS IN NONATTAINMENT UNDER AN APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STATE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for Specific Plan implementation during project construction would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard is discussed on pages 3.3-38 through 3.3-41 of the Draft EIR and determined to be significant.
(b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measures 3.3-2 through 3.3-6.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. As shown in Table 3.3-6 in Section 3.3 of the Draft EIR, construction activities associated with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan could potentially exceed the SJVAPCD regional thresholds for carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), reactive organic compounds (ROG), respirable particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). NOx is a precursor to the formation of both ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5).
ROG is a precursor to the formation of ozone. Project-related emission of NOx would contribute to the ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 nonattainment designations of the SJVAB. As part of the development process, individual, site-specific projects accommodated under the proposed Specific Plan that meet the criteria of Rule 9510 would be required to prepare a detailed air quality impact assessment (AIA). To the extent applicable under Rule 9510 for each such individual development, SJVAPCD would require calculation of the construction emissions from the development. The purpose of the AIA is to confirm a development’s construction exhaust emissions, and therefore be able to identify appropriate mitigation, either through implementation of specific mitigation measures (e.g., use of construction equipment with Tier 4-rated engines) or payment of applicable off-site fees. As stated, under Rule 9510, each project that is subject to this Rule would be required to reduce construction exhaust emissions by 20 percent for NOx or pay offset mitigation fees for emissions that do not achieve the mitigation requirements.
While adherence to Rule 9510 would contribute to reducing exhaust NOx emissions, it would not be applicable to reducing ROG emissions generated operation of equipment and from off-gassing from asphalt and paints, or other criteria pollutant
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 17 emissions. Therefore, project-related construction activities would result in significant regional air quality impacts.
Future development projects in the Plan Area would be required to comply with pre-existing requisite federal, State, SJVAPCD, and other local regulations and requirements. For example, application of SJVAPCD Rules 9510 and Regulation VIII would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction-related activities to the extent feasible and may result in reducing construction-related regional air quality impacts of individual projects. However, due to the programmatic nature of the proposed Specific Plan, construction time frames and equipment for individual site specific projects are not available and there is a potential for multiple developments to be constructed at any one time, resulting in significant construction-related emissions. Therefore, the proposed project would exceed the construction-related criteria pollutant thresholds as promulgated by the SJVAPCD.
Future development projects in the Plan Area would be required to implement all of the mitigation measures provided below for construction-related emissions.
However, even with implementation of the following mitigation measures, the proposed Specific Plan would cause a violation of an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, with respect to the construction of the proposed project. Therefore, construction of the Specific Plan would have a significant and unavoidable impact relative to this topic. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact associated with exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard during construction, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
CEQA FINDINGS
18 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan
3. IMPACT 3.3-3: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DURING PROJECT OPERATION WOULD EXPOSE
SENSITIVE RECEPTORS TO SUBSTANTIAL POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS OR RESULT IN A
CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE NET INCREASE OF ANY CRITERIA POLLUTANT FOR WHICH THE
PROJECT REGION IS IN NONATTAINMENT UNDER AN APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STATE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for Specific Plan implementation during project operation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard is discussed on pages 3.3-41 through 3.3-43 of the Draft EIR and determined to be significant.
(b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measure
3.3-7.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. As shown in Table 3.3-7 in Section 3.3, operation of future projects at buildout would generate air pollutant emissions that exceed SJVAPCD’s regional significance thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 at buildout. Emissions of ROG and NOx that exceed the SJVAPCD regional threshold would cumulatively contribute to the ozone nonattainment designation of the SJVAB. Emissions of NOx that exceed SJVAB’s regional significance thresholds would cumulatively contribute to the ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) nonattainment designations of the SJVAB. Emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 would contribute to the PM10 and PM2.5 nonattainment designations.
Application of State and SJVAPCD rules and regulations, such as Rules 9510 and 9410, implementation of the proposed Specific Plan’s roadway, bicycle, and trail improvements, policies, and complete streets design guidelines, and implementation of applicable General Plan policies would reduce operation-related criteria air pollutants generated from energy, stationary, and mobile sources to the extent feasible. In addition, Mitigation 3.3-7 requires the individual project applicants to incorporate mitigation measures to reduce operational activities.
As stated, the aforementioned improvements, goals, and policies could contribute to reducing operation-phase regional air quality impacts of future individual projects. Individual projects would also be required to undergo CEQA review.
However, despite implementation of the Specific Plan goals and policies, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the proposed Specific Plan. As such, operation of
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 19 the Specific Plan would have a significant and unavoidable impact relative to this topic.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact related to exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard during operation, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
4. IMPACT 4.3: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON THE REGION'S AIR QUALITY.
(c) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to have a cumulative impact on the region’s air quality is discussed on pages 4.0-7 and 4.0-8 of the Draft EIR. (b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measures 3.3-1 through 3.3-7.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. In accordance with SJVAPCD’s methodology, any project that produces a significant project-level regional air quality impact in an area that is in nonattainment contributes to the cumulative impact. Cumulative projects within the local area include new development and general growth within the Plan Area. The greatest source of emissions within the SJVAB is mobile sources. Due to the extent of the area potentially impacted from cumulative project emissions (i.e., the SJVAB); SJVAPCD considers a project cumulatively significant when project-related emissions exceed the SJVAPCD’s regional emissions thresholds. No significant cumulative impacts were identified with regard to CO hotspots.
As shown in Table 3.3-6 in Section 3.3, construction emissions associated with the proposed Plan would exceed the SJVAPCD’s regional construction emissions thresholds for CO, NOx, ROG, PM10, and PM2.5. Thus, the project’s contribution to
CEQA FINDINGS
20 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan cumulative air quality impacts would be cumulatively considerable and therefore significant.
For operational air quality emissions, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily regional threshold values is not considered by the SJVAPCD to be a substantial source of air pollution and does not add significantly to a cumulative impact. As discussed, SJVAPCD Rules 9510 and 9410 would contribute to reducing emissions of NOx and particulate matter associated with future individual projects accommodated under the proposed Specific Plan and may reduce impacts for these individual development projects to a less than significant level. In addition, the planned improvements, and goals and policies under the proposed project would generally support a more sustainable development pattern for the Plan Area. Creation of more complete neighborhoods in addition to improving the public transit, pedestrian, and bicycle networks and infrastructure would contribute to the overall reduction in vehicle trips and VMT, which would reduce mobile-source emissions. However, as shown in Table 3.3-7, due to the amount of growth for the proposed Plan Area, operation of the cumulative projects accommodated under the proposed Specific Plan would result in emissions in excess of the SJVAPCD regional emissions thresholds for ROG, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.
Thus, the proposed Specific Plan’s air pollutant emissions would be cumulatively considerable and therefore significant.
The mitigation measures provided within the air quality discussion (refer to Section
3.3) have been designed to be consistent with the guidance as promulgated by the SJVAPCD, where applicable. As is currently proposed, the Specific Plan is expected to be built out under a staged approach, and all mitigation would be applicable to each stage. However, even with the application of mitigation measures, operational and constructions emissions levels for the aforementioned criteria pollutants would remain above the defined thresholds of significance. Exceedance of the threshold within an area designated as nonattainment would be a cumulatively considerable impact. As such, implementation of the Specific Plan would have a cumulatively considerable contribution and a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact on the region’s air quality.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 21 associated with cumulative impacts to the region’s air quality, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
D. PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION
1. IMPACT 3.13-3: THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN MAY RESULT IN, OR HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO
REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SCHOOL FACILITIES WHICH MAY CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to result in, or have the potential to require the construction of school facilities which may cause substantial adverse physical environmental impacts is discussed on pages 3.13-33 and 3.13-34 of the Draft EIR.
(b) Mitigation Measure. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measure
3.13-2.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. As shown in Table 2.0-2 in Section 2.0, Project Description, of this EIR, the proposed land use map for the Plan Area would result in the addition of up to 54,953 new residential units and up to 60,621,006.31 square feet of non-residential uses at project build‐out. The increase in population would result in the introduction of additional students to the (Central Unified School District (CUSD).
According to the CUSD Facilities Master Plan (2016), 0.351 students are generated from each residential unit. Using this factor, future buildout of the Specific Plan is expected to generate approximately 19,289 additional students for the CUSD. It is also important to understand that special legal principles apply to impacts to school facilities. According to Government Code Section 65996, the development fees authorized by Senate Bill 50 (1998) (described earlier) are deemed to be “full and complete school facilities mitigation” for impact caused by new development. The legislation also recognized the need for the fee to be adjusted periodically to keep pace with inflation. The legislation indicated that in January 2000, and every two years thereafter, the State Allocation Board would increase the maximum fees according to the adjustment for inflation in the statewide index for school construction. However, even where applicants have agreed to pay school impact mitigation fees, if the proposed development requires the construction or expansion of additional facilities that would cause other physical environmental impacts, then those physical impacts to non-school resources may be analyzed under CEQA (Gov. Code § 65995(i)).
CEQA FINDINGS
22 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan Currently, as shown in Figure 3.13-1 in Section 3.13, 13 schools are located in the Plan Area, including nine elementary schools, three middle schools, and one high school. The proposed land use map includes an additional 10.0 acres of Elementary School land uses from what is shown in the Fresno General Plan Planned Land Use Map. This additional 10.0 acres for future development of an elementary school is located at the northwestern corner of the N. Brawley Avenue and W. Shields Avenue intersection. This elementary school would be part of the CUSD. In addition to this
10.0-acre elementary school site, there are also proposed and not yet built school sites in the Plan Area, including the following: an elementary school off Shields Avenue and west of Hayes Avenue, an elementary school at the northwest corner of Grantland and Dakota Avenues, and an elementary school off Dakota Avenue and east of Hayes Avenue
Physical impacts from future construction of this 10.0-acre elementary school site within the Plan Area is addressed within this EIR. A discussion of relevant operational and construction impacts can be found in each respective section of this EIR. Impacts associated with development of the Plan Area, as proposed, would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), and utilities (Impacts 3.15-1 through 3.15-3). Furthermore, sitespecific environmental review would be required for this future school by the CUSD prior to approval of a design for the facility and would consider any site-specific impacts unknown at this time.
Future buildout of the Specific Plan would include construction of a 10.0-acre elementary school site in the Plan Area, which has the potential to cause substantial adverse physical environmental impacts. Potential environmental impacts associated with the future buildout of the proposed land use map, including the
10.0-acre school site within the Plan Area, are addressed throughout this EIR. This EIR analyzes the physical environmental effects that may occur as a result of development and introduction of new urban land uses within the Plan Area. This future school, if constructed, would fall within the range of environmental impacts disclosed in the EIR, and would be subject to relevant mitigation measures included in this EIR.
It is noted, however, that future development of schools within the proposed Plan Area would contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), and air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3). Therefore, consistent with the analysis included in the EIR, impacts related to constructing a school facility to serve the Plan Area are considered significant and unavoidable.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 23 identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with impacts related to school facilities, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
2. IMPACT 3.13-4: THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN MAY RESULT IN, OR HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO
REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARK FACILITIES WHICH MAY CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.
(b) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to result in, or have the potential to require the construction of park facilities which may cause substantial adverse physical environmental impacts is discussed on pages 3.13-34 and 3.13-35 of the Draft EIR. (b) Mitigation Measure. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measure
3.13-3.
(c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Effects of Mitigation and Remaining Impacts. The proposed land use map for the Plan Area would result in the addition of up to 54,953 new residential units and up to 60,621,006.31 square feet of non-residential uses at project build‐out. Using this most recently available federal census figure of 3.16 persons per household and the potential maximum buildout of 54,953 units, the Quimby Act population would be 173,652 persons. This Quimby Act population would require 521 acres of parkland in order to meet the City’s parkland dedication standard of three acres of public parkland per 1,000 residents for Pocket, Neighborhood, and Community parks throughout the city.
The proposed Specific Plan land use map includes a total of 118.8 acres of park and open space uses, including pocket parks (1.55 acres), neighborhood parks (86.26 acres), community parks (24.20 acres), and open spaces (6.79 acres). The proposed project would increase the demand for parks and other recreational facilities based on the future maximum population growth, and the amount of parkland and open space provided within the Plan Area does not meets the City’s General Plan parkland dedication standard outlined in Policy POSS-1-a. Future development within the Plan Area would be subject to the Park Facilities Fee outlined in Article 4.7 of the City’s Municipal Code.
CEQA FINDINGS
24 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan The City collects Development Impact Fees from new development based upon projected impacts from the development. The City also reviews the adequacy of impact fees on an annual basis to ensure that the fee is commensurate with anticipated future facilities demands, assessed on a fair share basis for new development. Payment of the applicable impact fees by future project applicants as required by Mitigation Measure 3.13-1, and ongoing revenues that would come from, property taxes, sales taxes, and other revenues generated by future buildout of the Plan Area, would ensure that project impacts to park facilities are reduced to the extent feasible.
Specific Plan implementation may result in effects on parks, or has the potential to require the construction of park facilities which may cause substantial adverse physical environmental impact. Potential environmental impacts associated with the future construction of park and other recreational facilities within the Plan Area are addressed throughout this EIR. This EIR analyzes the physical environmental effects that may occur as a result of future development and introduction of new urban land uses within the Plan Area. Each future park, if constructed, would fall within the range of environmental impacts disclosed in the EIR, and would be subject to relevant mitigation measures included in the EIR.
It is noted, however, that future development of 118.8 acres of park space within the Plan Area would contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), and utilities (Impacts 3.15-1 through 3.15-3).
Therefore, consistent with the analysis included in the Draft EIR, impacts related to constructing new park facilities to serve the Plan Area are considered significant and unavoidable.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with impacts related to park facilities, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
3. IMPACT 4.13: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MAY CONTRIBUTE TO CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON PUBLIC SERVICES.
(d) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to have a cumulative impact on public services is discussed on pages 4.0-22 through 4.0-24 of the Draft EIR.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 25 (b) Mitigation Measures. No feasible mitigation measures were identified. (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. The cumulative setting would include all areas covered in the service areas of the City of Fresno Police Department, Fresno Fire Department (FFD), City of Fresno Parks, After School, Recreation, and Community Services (PARCS) Department, the CUSD, and the Fresno County Public Library System. This geographic area was chosen because these service providers would be required to serve the Plan Area as well as the entire service area. Therefore, future development within the Plan Area along with past, present, and probably future projects within the service area, has the potential to result in a cumulative impact associated with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan.
Under cumulative conditions future local and regional growth will result in increased demand for schools, police protection, fire protection, schools, parks/recreation, and library services. The City and its associated service providers must continue to evaluate the levels of service desired and the funding sources available to meet increases in demand.
The General Plan Final Master EIR analyzed cumulative impacts to public services (including police protection, fire and emergency services, schools, parks, and libraries) and found that General Plan implementation would result in less than cumulatively considerable impacts with implementation of Mitigation Measures PS1 (regarding future fire facilities), PS-2 (regarding future police facilities), PS-3 (regarding future school facilities), and PS-4 (regarding future parks and recreational facilities). The mitigation measures require evaluation of specific environmental effects of these future public service and recreational facilities, and list typical mitigations to reduce potential noise, traffic, and lighting impacts. The specific environmental impact of constructing new facilities could not be determined at the time, but the Final Master EIR found that construction and operation of such facilities could potentially cause significant impacts. These potential impacts, however, were addressed and mitigated to the greatest extent feasible by the General Plan mitigation measures included in Section 5.13 of the Fresno General Plan Final Master EIR.
Under cumulative conditions, future development of the Plan Area in accordance with the proposed Specific Plan land use map may result in the construction of public facilities, which may cause substantial adverse physical environmental impacts. The impact fees developed and reviewed by the City will recover future development’s proportionate share of City-related capital asset costs. Fees, as applied only to new development, represent future development’s proportionate share of public services and facilities capital costs.
CEQA FINDINGS
26 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan The construction and operation of future public facilities required to serve cumulative development (including the Plan Area) could potentially cause significant impacts. Cumulative development including additional parks and schools within the city and service area would contribute to significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts that have been identified within this EIR related to: aesthetics and visual resources (Section 3.1), agricultural resources (Section 3.2), air quality (Section 3.3), noise (Section 3.11), and public services and recreation (Section 3.13).
Therefore, consistent with the analysis included in the Draft EIR, cumulative impacts related to the construction of public facilities needed to meet future demand are considered significant and unavoidable and cumulatively considerable. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with cumulative impacts related to public services, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
E. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
1. IMPACT 3.15-1: THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN WOULD REQUIRE OR RESULT IN THE
RELOCATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR EXPANDED WASTEWATER FACILITIES, THE CONSTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. (c) Potential Impact. The potential for proposed Specific Plan to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, is discussed on pages 3.15-7 and
3.15-8 of the Draft EIR.
(b) Mitigation Measure. No feasible mitigation measures were identified. (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. The Specific Plan does not trigger a need to expand the Regional Facility. There would be a network of sewer collection infrastructure installed throughout the Plan Area to serve the West Area Specific Plan. The Specific Plan wastewater collection system will include future construction of sewer improvements and replacements of existing lines, some of which are now over 75 years old. Approximately 3.6 miles of public and privately-owned (i.e., homeowner’s
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 27 responsibility) sewer system drainage lines are proposed to serve the Plan Area at buildout.
Physical impacts from future construction of the wastewater infrastructure within the Plan Area is addressed within this EIR. A discussion of relevant operational and construction impacts can be found in each respective section of this EIR. Impacts associated with development of the Plan Area, as proposed, would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), public services and recreation (Impacts 3.13-3 through 3.13-5).
The construction of the new wastewater facilities, which are associated with future buildout of the Plan Area, has the potential to cause environmental impacts. The potential for environmental impacts associated with the installation of the wastewater system, and all construction activities within the Plan Area, are addressed throughout the EIR. In some cases, the direct and indirect impacts are potentially significant and warrant mitigation measures, while in other cases there are significant and unavoidable impacts. The future wastewater infrastructure would fall within the range of environmental impacts disclosed in the EIR, and would be subject to relevant mitigation measures included in the EIR.
It is noted, however, that future development of wastewater infrastructure within the proposed Plan Area would contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact
3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), public services and recreation (Impacts 3.13-3 through 3.13-5). Therefore, consistent with the analysis included in the Draft EIR, impacts related to construction of new or expanded stormwater drainage facilities to serve the Plan Area are considered significant and unavoidable. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with impacts related to relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
CEQA FINDINGS
28 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan
2. IMPACT 3.15-3: THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN WOULD REQUIRE OR RESULT IN
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR EXPANDED WATER FACILITIES, THE CONSTRUCTION OR RELOCATION OF WHICH COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. (d) Potential Impact. The potential for proposed Specific Plan to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, is discussed on pages 3.15-24 and 3.15- 25 of the Draft EIR.
(b) Mitigation Measure. No feasible mitigation measures were identified. (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. The provision of public services and the construction of onsite and offsite infrastructure improvements will be required to accommodate future development consistent with the Specific Plan land use map. The Specific Plan would likely require extension of offsite water infrastructure to the undeveloped and underdeveloped portions of the Plan Area for water service. All offsite water piping improvements would be in or adjacent to existing roadways, thereby limiting new environmental impacts.
More than 15 percent (42 wells out of 270) of the City’s wells were constructed prior to 1960 (over 60 years ago) and almost 40 percent (98 of 270) were constructed prior to 1970 (over 50 years ago). According to the Utility Background Summary completed for the Specific Plan, it has been recommended that the wells be replaced after 45 to 50 years; thus, about 40 percent of the City’s wells are overdue for replacement. Also, mechanical and electrical well component upgrades are required about every 20 to 25 years. Therefore, it is anticipated that significant well installations, replacements, and upgrades may be needed to these systems in the near future to maintain existing groundwater supply capacity and meet increased water demands.
One of the greatest challenges facing the City’s water distribution system is conveying water from areas of high-water production to areas of high-water demand. The water production and distribution system historically has been a distributed system whereby groundwater wells would be constructed on an asneeded basis in the area where the water was needed. This distributed water system does not require large diameter transmission mains to convey water from one portion of the City to another.
Physical impacts from future construction of the water infrastructure within the Plan Area is addressed within this EIR. A discussion of relevant operational and construction impacts can be found in each respective section of this EIR. Impacts associated with development of the Plan Area, as proposed, would result in
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 29 significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), public services and recreation (Impacts 3.13-3 through 3.13-5).
The construction of the new water facilities, which are associated with future buildout of the Plan Area, has the potential to cause environmental impacts. The potential for environmental impacts associated with the installation of the water system, and all construction activities within the Plan Area, are addressed throughout this EIR. In some cases, the direct and indirect impacts are potentially significant and warrant mitigation measures, while in other cases there are significant and unavoidable impacts. The future water infrastructure would fall within the range of environmental impacts disclosed in this EIR, and would be subject to relevant mitigation measures included in this EIR.
It is noted, however, that future development of water infrastructure within the proposed Plan Area would contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), public services and recreation (Impacts
3.13-3 through 3.13-5). Therefore, consistent with the analysis included in the Draft EIR, impacts related to construction of new or expanded stormwater drainage facilities to serve the Plan Area are considered significant and unavoidable. (2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with impacts related to relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
3. IMPACT 3.15-5: THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN WOULD REQUIRE OR RESULT IN THE
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR EXPANDED STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES, THE CONSTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. (e) Potential Impact. The potential for proposed Specific Plan to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater drainage facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, is discussed on pages 3.15-35 and 3.15-36 of the Draft EIR.
(b) Mitigation Measure. No feasible mitigation measures were identified.
CEQA FINDINGS
30 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan (c) Findings. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that:
(1) Remaining Impacts. Stormwater represents a water supply opportunity that the City is currently leveraging with its extensive recharge basin system. Infiltration of captured stormwater allows groundwater to be recharged, improves overall water quality, and reduces the need for additional other water supplies.
Since the system is designed to handle approximately a two-year event within the underground drainage system, a significant amount of drainage is conveyed in the streets or through “major storm breakover” conveyances to detention/retention flood basins. This tends to result in shallow flooding over significant areas during larger events, but coupled with large regional flood control projects, the system can handle up to a 200-year, 30-day event.
Installation of storm drainage infrastructure would occur during the construction phases of individual future projects within the Plan Area. There is significant storm drainage infrastructure remaining to be constructed to serve the Plan Area. About 32 miles of additional drainage pipelines is anticipated to be constructed to meet buildout needs.
Physical impacts from future construction of the storm drainage infrastructure within the Plan Area is addressed within this EIR. A discussion of relevant operational and construction impacts can be found in each respective section of this EIR. Impacts associated with development of the Plan Area, as proposed, would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), public services and recreation (Impacts 3.13-3 through 3.13-5).
The construction of the new on-site stormwater drainage facilities, which are associated with future buildout of the Plan Area, has the potential to cause environmental impacts. The potential for environmental impacts associated with the installation of the stormwater system, and all construction activities within the Plan Area, are addressed throughout this EIR. In some cases, the direct and indirect impacts are potentially significant and warrant mitigation measures, while in other cases there are significant and unavoidable impacts. The future storm drainage infrastructure would fall within the range of environmental impacts disclosed in this EIR, and would be subject to relevant mitigation measures included in this EIR.
It is noted, however, that future development of storm drainage infrastructure within the proposed Plan Area would contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics (Impact 3.1-3), agricultural resources (Impact 3.2-1 and Impact 3.2-2), air quality (Impacts 3.3-1 through 3.3-3), public services and recreation (Impacts 3.13-3 through 3.13-5). Therefore, consistent with the analysis included in the Draft EIR, impacts related to construction of new or expanded
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 31 stormwater drainage facilities to serve the Plan Area are considered significant and unavoidable.
(2) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the proposed project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect, as identified in the Final EIR. To the extent that this significant adverse impact will not be substantially lessened or avoided, the City Council finds that specific economic, social, policy-based, and other considerations identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations support approval of the project. (3) Overriding Considerations. The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override any remaining significant adverse impact of the Project associated with impacts related to relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater drainage facilities, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VII, below.
IV. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT
IMPACTS WHICH ARE MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT
LEVEL
A. AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES
1. IMPACT 3.1-4: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION HAS THE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to cause substantial adverse health effects on human beings from elevated pollutant concentrations, either directly or indirectly is discussed on page 3.1-11 through 3.1-14 of the Draft EIR. (b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measures 3.1-1 through 3.1-2.
(c) Findings. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would introduce new sources of light and glare into the Plan Area. Increases in lighting and the introduction of new light sources would occur with new development in the Plan Area. Development within the Plan Area will include new roads, some of which will include lighting systems along the rights-of-way. Residential development will include interior and exterior light sources.
Non-residential development will include lighting systems for parking areas, building, and signs, including security lighting. Some park and recreation facilities may include sports lighting to illuminate play areas for evening activities. Other public facility uses, such as schools and fire stations, will also involve lighting for parking, buildings, and security. Additionally, with the increase in development in the Plan Area, there will be increases in nighttime traffic that will increase lighting from car headlights. Although lighting would be reviewed on a project-by-project basis, for the purposes of this
CEQA FINDINGS
32 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan analysis, it has been conservatively assumed that exterior lighting would be located throughout most of the outdoor areas of the Plan Area. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, street lighting in the residential areas; exterior lighting on the buildings; courtyard lighting; and parking lot lighting.
The introduction of new light sources and intensification of lighting within the Plan Area would be most notable in areas that are not currently developed or have minimal development within the western and southern portions of the Plan Area. Development in the westernmost portion of the Plan Area could result in lighting within the Plan Area being visible from uses adjacent to and outside of the Plan Area. The City’s Outdoor Lighting and Illumination Ordinance would reduce the impact of lighting impacts onto adjacent properties. However, although direct impacts associated with new lighting would be reduced with compliance with General Plan policies and adherence to the City’s Outdoor Lighting and Illumination Ordinance, the overall increase in lighting that would occur within the area would create a new source of substantial light which could adversely affect nighttime views in the area, specifically the nightime sky.
Development in accordance with the Specific Plan will increase the amount of structures that could create new sources of glare within the Planning Area and directly adjacent to the Planning Area. These new sources of glare could be from materials used on building facades, parking lots, signs, and motor vehicles. Within the City limits, there are currently many sources of glare, and future development will add to the existing sources. Within the rural and agricultural areas, there are limited sources of glare. The primary sources of glare that will be added within the Planning Area will occur from vertical structures such as building facades. Parking lots, roadway surfaces and motor vehicles do not create substantial amount of glare. Due to the substantial amount of new building square footage planned for the Plan Area, new buildings may have the potential, to result in a substantial increase in glare. This increase could result in a potentially significant glare impact. However, glare impacts would be reduced with compliance of General Plan policies, design review, municipal code requirements, and implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.1-1 that will require reflective building materials, visible from sensitive receptors, be prohibited from future project sites within the Plan Area.
There is the potential for reflective building materials and windows to result in increases in daytime glare within the Plan Area. The use of reflective building materials, including polished steel and reflective glass, could increase daytime glare for sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project area. However, Mitigation Measure 3.1-1 would ensure that the potential for glare from proposed project buildings and structures would be minimized. With implementation of this mitigation measure, this is considered less than significant impact.
Light sources from the proposed development may have a significant adverse impact on the surrounding areas, by introducing nuisance light into the area and decreasing the
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 33 visibility of nighttime skies. Additionally, on-site light sources may create light spillover impacts on surrounding land uses in the absence of mitigation. However, the proposed project will be required to comply with the City of Fresno outdoor lighting and illumination standards and specifications, and would be required to incorporate design features to minimize the effects of light and glare. However, without a detailed lighting plan, increase of nighttime lighting is a potentially significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.1-2 would reduce potential impacts associated with nighttime lighting and light spillage onto adjacent properties to a less than significant level.
In accordance with Public Resources Code, § 21081, Measures 3.1-1 through 3.1-2 are appropriate changes or alterations that have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that the potential for the Project to cause substantial adverse health effects on human beings from elevated pollutant concentrations, either directly or indirectly will be mitigated to a less than significant level.
B. AIR QUALITY
1. IMPACT 3.3-4: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION HAS THE POTENTIAL TO RESULT IN OTHER
EMISSIONS (SUCH AS THOSE LEADING TO ODORS) AFFECTING A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE.
(a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people is discussed on page 3.3-43 through 3.3-48 of the Draft EIR.
(b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measures 3.3-8 through 3.3-10.
(c) Findings. During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust and application of asphalt and architectural coatings would temporarily generate odors. Any construction-related odor emissions would be temporary and intermittent in nature.
Additionally, noxious odors would be confined to the immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. By the time such emissions reach any sensitive receptor sites, they would be diluted to well below any level of air quality concern. Furthermore, shortterm construction-related odors are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor-producing materials. Nevertheless, the proposed project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure 3.3-8, as applicable. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.3-8, impacts associated with construction-generated odors are considered less than significant.
In general, land uses that would require a permit from SJVAPCD for emissions of TACs include chemical processing facilities, chrome-plating facilities, dry cleaners, and
CEQA FINDINGS
34 CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan gasoline-dispensing facilities. As the proposed Specific Plan is a program-level document, it is currently unknown which types of stationary sources may be installed, if any. However, the proposed Specific Plan would generally prohibit the development of heavy industrial-type land uses. While development of land uses may result in stationary source emissions such as dry cleaners and restaurants with charbroilers or buildings with emergency generators, these types of land uses would not be large emitters. Additionally, they would be controlled by SJVAPCD through permitting and would be subject to further study and health risk assessment prior to the issuance of any necessary air quality permits under Regulation II. According to SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, Regulation II ensures that stationary source emissions (permitted sources) would be reduced or mitigated below SJVAPCD significance thresholds of ten in one million cancer risk and one for acute risk at the maximally exposed individual. Though these sources would incrementally contribute to the project’s inventory individually, they would be mitigated to the standards identified above. Moreover, future development projects in the Plan Area would be required to implement Mitigation Measure 3.3-9, which requires project applicants for individual projects to conduct health risk assessments (where warranted by land use and proposal). In addition, Mitigation Measure 3.3-10 requires sensitive land uses to avoid incompatibilities with recommended buffer distances identified in the most current version of the CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook:
A Community Health Perspective (CARB Handbook). Sensitive land uses that are within the recommended buffer distances listed in the CARB Handbook are required to provide enhanced filtration units or submit a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) to the City. If the HRA shows that the project would exceed the applicable SJVAPCD thresholds, mitigation measures capable of reducing potential impacts to an acceptable level must be identified and approved by the City.
In accordance with Public Resources Code, § 21081, Measures 3.3-8 through 3.8-10 are appropriate changes or alterations that have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. Based upon the EIR and the entire record before this City Council, this City Council finds that the potential for the Project to result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people will be mitigated to a less than significant level.
2. IMPACT 3.3-5: SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY. (a) Potential Impact. The potential for the Project to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly is discussed on page 3.3-48 through 3.3-52 of the Draft EIR.
(b) Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided by the Mitigation Monitoring Program: Mitigation Measures 3.3-1 through 3.3-10.
CEQA FINDINGS
CEQA Findings – West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan 35 (c) Findings. Future development projects in the Plan Area would generate emissions of PM during project operational activities, as shown in Table 3.3-7 in Section 3.3. Although the exact effects of such emissions on local health are not known, it is likely that the increases in PM generated by the proposed project would especially affect people with impaired respiratory systems, but also healthy adults and children located in the immediate vicinity of the Specific Plan Area. However, the increases of these pollutants generated by the proposed project are not on their own likely to generate an increase in the number of days exceeding the NAAQS or CAAQS standards, based on the size of the project in comparison the Fresno County and the wider region as a whole. Instead, the increases in PM generated by the proposed project when combined with the existing PM emitted regionally, would affect people, especially those with impaired respiratory systems located in the immediate vicinity of the Specific Plan Area. Nevertheless, if a health risk assessment is warranted for a specific facility within the Specific Plan Area, it would be prepared in accordance with Mitigation Measure 3.3-7.