West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan
City Council Hearing
October 13, 2022
5:00pm
ID#22-1243
1 Introduction
2 Presentation Outline
1. Background
2. Outreach & Engagement
3. Specific Plan Overview
4. Environmental Impact Report
5. Public Comment
6. West Area Story
7. Implementation
8. 09/29 Workshop Responses
9. District Committees & Planning Commission
10.Findings & Staff Recommendations
Covered in 09/29 workshop
3 1. Background
4 4
5 5
Purpose
• Refine the General Plan for the
Wes
t Area
• Regulate Land Use
• Create focused policies to address
un
ique needs and community vision
6 6
Milestones
1998: Highway City Plan adopted
2002: West Area Community Plan
adopted
2014: General Plan adopted
2018: Process kick-off
- outreach activities
2019: Plan initiated
2020: Plan and EIR drafted
2021: Draft Plan released
- outreach activities
2022: Draft EIR released
Final EIR released
Revised Plan released
Planning Commission
City Council
7 7
2. Outreach & Engagement
8 8
Steering Committee
District 1
David Peña (Chair)
Dennis Gaab
Tiffany Mangum
Eric Payne
Joseph Martinez
District 2
Cathy Caples
John Kashian
Jeff Roberts
Tina McCallister-
Boothe (Alternate)
District 3
Deep Singh
(Vice Chair)
Bill Nijjer
Gurdeep Shergill
9 9
Outreach
• Email
• Direct mail
• Flyers
• Specific Plans To-Go
• Tabling events
• Social media
• Radio announcement
• Webpage
• Legal notices
• Committee presentations
10 10
Engagement
• Steering Committee Meetings (17)
• Community Workshops (12)
• Committee Presentations (13)
• Surveys (3)
11 11
3. Specific Plan Overview
12 12
Plan Area
13 13
Guiding Principles
• Transportation
• Parks & Trails
• Agriculture
• Retail
• Housing
• Catalytic Corridors
• Education
• Public Safety
14 14
Information
15 15
Goals & Policies
16 16
Land Use Vision
17 17
Transect
18 18
Catalytic
Corridors
Centers or linear
nodes, designed to
create complementary
investment to nearby
and surrounding areas
Lancaster Boulevard
Lancaster, CA
19 19
Catalytic
Corridors
20 20
Level of Change
• Moderate Level of Change
• Urban to rural transition
• Catalytic Corridors
21 21
Specific Plan
Proposed Land Use
22 22
4. Environmental Impact Report
23 23
Environmental Impact Report
Program-Level EIR
Notice of Preparation: June 28, 2019
Public Scoping Meeting: July 24, 2019
Circulation of Draft EIR: February 10 – March 28, 2022
• 9 comments received
Fi
nal EIR released: July 8, 2022
24 24
Noticing for Public Comment Period
February 10 – March 28, 2022 (47-day review period)
February 10, 2022
• Email to the Steering Committee
• Email to the stakeholder list
• Email + Letter to Reviewing Agencies and NOP Commenters • Published in Fresno Bee
• Available at Central Branch and Teague Branch Libraries • Available at City Hall
• Posted to Plan webpage
Ma
rch 7, 2022
• Announced during the Steering Committee Meeting
25 25
26 26
Comment Letters
1. Caltrans District 6
2. Daniel Brannick
3. Department of Toxic Substances
Con
trol
4. Fresno Area Express
5. Fresno County Department of
Agr
iculture
6. Fresno County
7. Fresno Irrigation District
8. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Co
ntrol District
9. Fresno Metropolitan Flood
Co
ntrol District
27 27
Impact Areas Analyzed
• Aesthetics and Visual Resources
• Agricultural Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural and tribal resources
• Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
• Greenhouse Gases, Climate
Cha
nge, and Energy
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Land Use
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services and Recreation
• Transportation and Circulation
• Utilities
28 28
Impact Areas Analyzed
Significant and Unavoidable Impacts:
• Aesthetics and Visual Resources
• Agricultural Resources
• Air Quality
• Public Services and Recreation
• Utilities
29 29
5. Specific Plan Public Comment
30 30
Public Comment & Plan Development
31 31
Early
Engagement
32 32
2021 | Public Draft
• Released April 30, 2021
• Draft created based on feedback garnered in outreach activities an
d Steering Committee meetings.
• Comment Period: April 30 – Se ptember 1, 2021
• 31 comment letters
• 155 discrete comments, requests, and questions documented • 19 Land Use Change Requests
33 33
2022 | Revised Public Draft
• Released April 25, 2022
• Incorporates 70 changes made to Narrative, Aesthetics, Goals, an
d Policies
• Presented to the Steering Committee
• Presented to District Project Review Committees
34 34
2022 | Planning Commission Draft
• Released July 7, 2022
• Incorporates 6 changes made to Narrative, Goals, and Policies • District 1 Project Review Committee
• Changes to Policy LUH 1.4 related to Highway City (1) • Staff
• Updated title & acknowledgements page (2)
• Changes to Policy PF 1.10 related to the Herndon Canal (1) • Addition of Policy I 1.3 related to policy change procedures and related Glossary de
finitions (2)
35 35
Land Use Change Requests
36 36
Land Use Change Requests
• 19 requests received
• Staff recommends 12 requests
• 3 late requests
• Information + recommendations
ar
e provided in Exhibit N
Recommended land use change
requests will be evaluated for a
follow-up Plan Amendment.
37 37
6. West Area Story
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 “Streets that look like boa
constrictors after lunch”
Get ready
to merge!
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 7. Implementation
76 Implementation Policies (Summarized)
I 1.1 Establish a Specific Plan Implementation Committee I 1.2 Investigate an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) for the West Area to address greenspace and infrastructure gaps I 1.3 Substantial changes to Plan policies shall occur through a robust public engagement process
77 8. 09/29 Workshop Responses
78 Topics Raised
1. Housing Capacity
2. Regional Park
3. Urban-Rural Interface
4. A
gricultural Mitigation
5. Veterans & 180
6. Noticing of Land Use Changes
7. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
79 Housing Capacity
80 General Plan Specific Plan
81 Housing Capacity
Changes without
MUTA
82 Housing Capacity
Changes w/MUTA
83 84
85 Regional Park
86 PF 1.8 Initiate a citywide community
review of the proposed regional park
designation as shown on Map 4-2 and
collaborate with residents to identify the
desired amenities and agricultural
features to be incorporated along with
methods to fund its development.
Regional Park –
Studied Options
87 Urban-Rural Interface
88 Urban-Rural Interface
Adapted from West Area Community Plan Policy W-1-e.
LUH 5.1 Consider updating the Development Code so that when land proposed for urban development abuts active farmland, planned farmland, or rural residential, the new project shall include and provide for the maintenance of one of the following design features to provide a rural/urban buffer:
• Provide landscaping and setbacks to fully obscure the new development’s bui
ldings and fences.
• Do not include fencing, or provide only see-thr ough fencing no greater than four feet in height between the new development and the existing property. • Provide open space such as edible gardens, landscaped walkways, trails or ra
ingardens to be no less than 30 feet in width.
• Locate boundary streets between the new and existing developments. 89 90
Agricultural Mitigation
91 92
92 93
93 LESA Example* - 6605 W. Shaw Ave
94 Factor Scores Factor Weight Weighted Factor Scores
LE Factors
Land Capability
Classification 40 0.25 10
Storie Index 20 0.25 5
LE Subtotal 0.5 15
SA Factors
Project Size 0 0.15 0
Water Resource
Availability 90 0.15 13.5
Surrounding
Agricultural Land 0 0.15 0
Surrounding
Protected
Resource Land 0 0.05 0
SA Subtotal 0.5 13.5
Final LESA Score 28.5
Significant? No
94 Key Court Cases
BIA of Central California v. County of Stanislaus et al. (2010) • Upheld a 1:1 mitigation measure and determined a reasonable r
elationship between the adverse impacts and required mitigation.
Masonite Corporation v. County of Mendocino (2013)
• Invalidated an EIR claiming no feasible mitigation measures to f
armland loss. Determined easements at a 1:1 scale can offset loss.
King & Gardiner Farms, LLC v. County of Kern (2020)
• 1:1 mitigation alone is not enough to compensate the loss of far
mland to a less than significant impact.
95 95
Veterans & 180
Noticing of Land Use Changes
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
96 9. District Committee &
Planning Commission Recommendations
97 Recommendations Received
District 1, 2, & 3 Project Review Committees | April & May 2022 • Voted to recommend approval
• D1 with modification to Policy LUH 1.4
Planning Commission | July 20, 2022
• Voted to recommend approval (5-0)
• With addition of late land use change request “L-2” to the follow- up Plan Amendment list
98 10. Findings & Staff Recommendations
99 Findings
- Fresno Municipal Code
- Housing Element
- SB 330
100
Fresno Municipal Code
• Consistency with the General Plan goals and policies
• A concurrent Plan Amendment to the General Plan Figure LU-1 e nsures land use consistency between the General Plan and Specific Plan • The Plan helps implement Objectives in the following Elements: Economic De
velopment; Urban Form, Land Use, and Design; Mobility and Transportation; Parks, Open Space, and Schools; Public Utilities and Services; Resource Conservation and Resilience; Historic and Cultural Resources; and Healthy Communities
• Consistency with the Development Code
• The Plan relies on the Development Code for implementation. • The Plan does not modify the Development Code.
101
Housing Element – Gov. Code 65863
Adoption of the Plan would impact dwelling unit capacities on Housing Element sites as follows:
0-12 du/ac: net loss of 53 units of capacity
12-16 du/ac: net gain of 1,625 units of capacity
16-30 du/ac: net loss of 5,119 units of capacity
Surplus capacity exists to accommodate the reduction in affected categories.
102
Housing Element – Gov. Code 65863
Therefore:
1. The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan; and
2. The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to ac
commodate the jurisdiction’s share of the Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA).
103
Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (SB 330)
• Adoption of the Plan by itself would result in the loss of ca
pacity for 12,227 housing units.
• Staff proposes concurrent adoption of P22-02413 (M ixed Use Text Amendment) to provide additional capacity.
• Concurrent adoption of the Plan and Text Amendment will res
ult in an overall gain of 7,169 units in the West Area, thereby allowing the Plan to comply with SB 330.
104
Staff Recommendations
105
Errata
• Correction of the Rezone map to fix zoning on certain parcels and
to remove certain parcels where the current dual
designation is to remain.
106
Staff Recommendations
1. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the findings set forth in the Final En
vironmental Impact Report (EIR SCH No. 2019069117) (see Exhibits I, J, and K).
a. RECOMMEND ADOPTION of an appropriate Mitigation Monitoring and Rep
orting Program (MMRP) as required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15097; and,
b. RECOMMEND ADOPTION of findings based upon testimony presented by st
aff that there are significant, unavoidable, environmental impacts which have not been mitigated to a level below significant. Therefore, the City Council should adopt the findings of fact and consider an appropriate statement of overriding considerations.
107
Staff Recommendations
2. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of Plan Amendment Application
P22-0
1351 which proposes to repeal the West Area
Community Plan, pertaining to approximately 12,341 acres located in the Development Area-1 West Development Area, and the portion of the Highway City Neighborhood Specific Plan that overlaps the West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan Boundary, approximately 455 acres (see Exhibit S). 108
Staff Recommendations
3. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of Plan Amendment Application
P22-0
1352 which proposes to adopt the West Area
Neighborhoods Specific Plan and accompanying Planned
Land Use Map (see Exhibits C and T).
109
Staff Recommendations
4. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of Plan Amendment Application
P22-0
1353 which proposes to update the Planned Land Use
Map (Figure LU-1) of the Fresno General Plan to incorporate the land use changes proposed in the West Area
Neighborhoods Specific Plan (see Exhibit U).
110
Staff Recommendations
5. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of Rezone Application P22-
01353 wh
ich proposes to rezone approximately 1,078 acres
of property within the West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan area to be consistent with the planned land uses
proposed in the Plan (see Exhibit V).
111
Staff Recommendations
6. RECOMMEND APPROVAL au thorizing the Planning
Department Director or her designee to update the text, policies, maps, tables, and figures contained in the West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan document to reflect the final action taken by City Council, to the extent that such updates are necessary to maintain consistency (See Exhibit W).
112
Staff Recommendations
7. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of initiating staff-recommended
Land Use Change Requests for a follow-up amendment to
the West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan to include land use change requests and an updated dual land use map
(Exhibit X).
113
End of Presentation
114
West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan
Plan Amendment Exhibit Maps
115
116
117
118
West Area Neighborhoods Specific Plan
Land Use Change Requests
119
120
Comment ID#s - Requests Received
• 3-1
• 6-1
• 8-1
• 11-12/ 19-1
• 11-
13 • 12-22
• 12-23
• 13-1
• 14-1
• 16-1
• 18-1
• 22-1
• 23-1
• 27-1
• 29-7
• 29-8
• 30-1
• 31-1
• L-1
• L-2
• L-3
• L-4
121
ID# 3-1 | APN 510-030-23
• Request by land owner: Highway City Community Development • Request to re designate from Split/Dual Public Facility and Medium Density Residential to Split/Dual Public Facility and Neighborhood Mixed-Use • Size is 2.67 acres
• G
eneral plan de signation is Medium Density Residential
• Current use is public facility
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation: a pprove request
• Steering Committee recommendation: approve request
122
ID# 3-1 | APN 510-030-23
WANSP Designation
Public Facility
Requested Designation
Neighborhood Mixed-Use
Polk
Gettysburg
Polk
Gettysburg
123
ID# 6-1 | APN 511-022-01
• Request by la nd owner representative: Precision Civil Engineering • Request to re designate from Community Commercial to 2.6 acres of Community Commercial and 16.14 acres of Medium Density Residential • Size is 18.74 acres
• G
eneral Plan designation is Community Commercial
• Current Use is vacant
• Location is in District 1
• O
riginal Staff recommendation: approve request with 5 acres of commercial • Steering Committee recommendation: approve with request 2.6 acres of commercial • Current Staff recommendation: approve with request 2.6 acres of commercial 124
ID# 6-1 | APN 511-022-01
WANSP Designation
Community Commercial
Requested Designation
Community Commercial + Medium
Density Residential
Polk
Shields
Polk
Shields
125
ID# 8-1 | APNs 505-040-33 +34, 505-040-17 +18
• Request by community member
• Request to red esignate from NMX - Neighborhood Mixed Use to a designation with lower density/activity
• Size is 9.36 acres
• G
eneral plan de signation is Medium High Density Residential • Current use is rural residential
• Location is in District 2
• S
taff recommendation : propose alternative to keep General Plan Land Use (Medium High)
• Steering Committee recommendation: d eny request
126
ID# 8-1 | APNs 505-040-33 +34, 50504017 +18
WANSP Designation
Neighborhood Mixed-Use
Requested Designation
Not Specified
Barstow
Grantland
Barstow
Grantland
127
ID# 11-12 & 19-1 | Park Space
• Request by St eering Committee members
• Request to add O ption B as park space to the Land Use Map; consider a Regional Park in the southern portion of the Plan Area
• Size n/a
• G
eneral plan n/a
• Current use n/a
• L
ocation is area wide
• Or
iginal Staff recommendation : n eutral
• Steering Committee recommendation: t abled
• Current Staff recommendation: continue to table
128
129
ID# 11-13 | APNs 512-050-55 & 512-050-59
• Request by St eering Committee member Caples
• Request to re designate from Commercial General to Split/Dual Community Park and Commercial General
• Size is 13.98 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Split/Dual Community Park and Community Commercial • Current use is a food packing facility
• Location is in County
• O
riginal Staff recommendation: n eutral
• Steering Committee recommendation: a pprove request
• Current Staff recommendation: a pprove request
130
ID# 11-13 | APNs 512-050-55 & 512-050-59
WANSP Designation
Commercial General
Requested Designation
Community Park + Commercial General
Grantland
Dakota
Grantland
Dakota
131
ID# 12-22 | CFD Parks
• Request by community member
• Request to show CFD parks on the Land Use Map
• Size n/a
• G
eneral plan n/a
• C
urrent use n/a
• Location is area wide
• S
taff recommendation: a pprove request
• Steering Committee recommendation: a pprove request
132
ID# 12-22 | CFD Parks
Example - WANSP Designation Example - Requested Designation Barstow
Grantland
Barstow
Grantland
133
ID# 12-23 | Powerline Trail
• Request by community member
• Request to ext end the land use of Open Space along the designated Class 1 Trail north from Gettysburg under the powerline alignment to Shaw Avenue. • Size ~7 acres
• G
eneral plan Nei ghborhood Park, Medium Density Residential, Residential Urban Neighborhood, High Density Residential
• Current use po werlines
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation: a pprove request
• Steering Committee recommendation: approve request
134
ID# 12-23 | Powerline Trail
WANSP Designation
Medium Density Residential + Residential
Urban Neighborhood
Requested Designation
Open Space
Hayes
Gettysburg
Hayes
Gettysburg
135
ID# 13-1 | APNs 511-240-01, 511-240-35, 511-
240-36, 511-240-38, 511-240-19, & 511-240-03
• Request by co mmunity member
• Request to re designate from Commercial General to Community Commercial or a Mixed-Use Designation
• Size is 18.34 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Community Commercial, Commercial General • Current use is gas station, car wash, vacant
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation : a pprove request with Community Commercial • Steering Committee recommendation: d eny request
136
ID# 13-1 | APNs 511-240-01, 511-240-35, 511-
240-36, 511-240-38, 511-240-19, & 511-240-03
WANSP Designation
Commercial General
Requested Designation
Community Commercial or Mixed-Use
B l yth e
Ashlan
B l yth e
Ashlan
137
ID# 14-1 | Shields/Dakota/Cornelia/Blythe
• Request by co mmunity member
• Request to ma intain existing designations
• Size is ~162 acres
• G
eneral plan designations are Low Density Residential, Medium Low Density Re
sidential, Medium Density Residential, and Medium High Density Residential • Current use is primarily vacant, ag, rural residential • Location is in the County
• Or
iginal Staff recommendation : no recommendation at this time • Steering Committee recommendation: t abled
• Current Staff recommendation: d eny request
138
ID# 14-1 | Shields/Dakota/Cornelia/Blythe
WANSP Designation
Medium Low, Medium, Medium High,
Urban Neighborhood, Commercial General
Requested Designation
Low Density, Medium Low Density,
Medium Density, and Medium High Density
B l yth e
Shields
B l yth e
Shields
139
ID# 16-1 | APN 505-060-07
• Request by land owner representative: Land Development Services • Request to red esignate from Neighborhood Mixed-Use to Medium Density Residential
• Size is 2.75 acres
• G
eneral plan de signation is Regional Mixed-Use
• Current use is vacant
• Location is in District 2
• S
taff recommendation: a pprove request
• Steering Committee recommendation: approve request
140
ID# 16-1 | APN 505-060-07
WANSP Designation
Neighborhood Mixed-Use
Requested Designation
Medium Density Residential
Barstow
Grantland
Barstow
Grantland
141
ID# 18-1 | APN 512-070-50
• Request by land owner: Wathen Castanos Homes
• Request to re designate from Community Commercial to Medium Density Residential
• Size is 5 acres
• G
eneral plan de signation is Medium Density Residential
• Current use is medium density housing
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation : approve request
• Steering Committee recommendation: approve request
142
ID# 18-1 | APN 512-070-50
WANSP Designation
Community Commercial
Requested Designation
Medium Density Residential
Hayes
Ashlan
Hayes
Ashlan
143
ID# 22-1 | APNs 511-240-15S & 511-240-16S
• Request by land owner: A1 Truck Driving School
• Request to red esignate from Residential Urban Neighborhood to General Commercial
• Size is 2.39 acres
• G
eneral plan de signation is Medium High Density
• Current use is vacant, rural residential
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation: ne utral
• Steering Committee recommendation: approve request
144
ID# 22-1 | APNs 511-240-15S & 511-240-16S
WANSP Designation
Residential Urban Neighborhood
Requested Designation
Commercial General
Ashlan
Brawley
Ashlan
Brawley
145
ID# 23-1 | Shields/Dakota/Grantland/Garfield
• Request by la nd owner representative: Assemi Group
• Request to red esignate from Medium Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
• Size is 126.95 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Medium Density Residential
• Current use is a griculture
• Location is in District 1
• Or
iginal Staff recommendation : no recommendation at this time • Steering Committee recommendation: d eny request
• Current Staff recommendation: d eny request
146
ID# 23-1 | Shields/Dakota/Grantland/Garfield
WANSP Designation
Medium Low Density Residential
Requested Designation
Medium Density Residential
Dakota
Garfield
Dakota
Garfield
147
ID# 27-1 | APN 433-090-24S
• Request by land owner
• Request to redesignate from Medium High Density Residential to High Den
sity Residential
• Size is 3.06 acres
• G
eneral plan des ignation is Medium High Density Residential • Current use is vacant
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation: d eny request
• Steering Committee recommendation: d eny request
148
ID# 27-1 | APN 433-090-24S
WANSP Designation
Medium High Density Residential
Requested Designation
High Density Residential
Shields
Valentine Shields
Valentine
149
ID# 29-7 | APN 512-021-26
• Request by Sta ff
• Request to red esignate from Medium Density Residential to Community Commercial • Size is 4.64 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Medium Density Residential and Community Commercial • Current use is a griculture
• Location is in District 1
• S
taff recommendation: a pprove request
• Steering Committee recommendation: a pprove request
150
ID# 29-7 | APN 512-021-26
WANSP Designation
Medium Density Residential
Requested Designation
Community Commercial
Garfield
Ashlan
Garfield
Ashlan
151
ID# 29-8 | APNs 312-052-14, 312-052-48
• Request by Sta ff
• Request to red esignate from Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Mixed-Use or Community Commercial
• Size is 5 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Community Commercial
• Current use is r ural residential, agriculture
• Location is in the County
• S
taff recommendation : a pprove request with Community Commercial • Steering Committee recommendation: approve request with Community Commercial 152
ID# 29-8 | APNs 312-052-14, 312-052-48
WANSP Designation
Medium Density Residential
Requested Designation
Neighborhood Mixed-Use or
Community Commercial
Shields
B ryan
Shields
B ryan
153
ID# 30-1 | 512-130-14
• Request by la nd owner
• Request to red esignate from Office to Neighborhood Mixed-Use • Size is .57 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Medium Density Residential
• Current use is r ural residential
• Location is in County
• Or
iginal Staff recommendation : no recommendation at this time • Steering Committee recommendation: d eny request
• Current Staff recommendation: d eny request
154
ID# 30-1 | 512-130-14
WANSP Designation
Office
Requested Designation
Neighborhood Mixed-Use
Ashlan
Grantland
Ashlan
Grantland
155
ID# 31-1 | 511-021-13
• Request by la nd owner
• Request to red esignate from Medium Density Residential to Community Commercial • Size is 2.03 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Medium Density Residential
• Current use is a griculture
• Location is in County
• Or
iginal Staff recommendation : n eutral
• Steering Committee recommendation: a pprove request
• Current Staff recommendation: a pprove request
156
ID# 31-1 | 511-021-13
WANSP Designation
Medium Density Residential
Requested Designation
Community Commercial
Shields
Polk
Shields
Polk
157
ID# LU-1 | 510-022-82
• Request by John Kashian
• Request to redesignate from Office to Community Commercial • Size is 2.32 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Community Commercial
• Current use is vacant
• Location is in District 1
158
ID# LU-1 | 510-022-82
WANSP Designation
Office
Requested Designation
Community Commercial
Ashlan
Polk
Ashlan
Polk
159
ID# LU-2 | 505-060-16S, 505-060-42, 505-
060-41, 505-060-43, 505-060-34, 505-060-33
• Request by la nd owner representative: Precision Civil Engineering • Request to re designate from Neighborhood Mixed-Use to Regional Mixed-Use & from Community Park to Corridor-Center Mixed-Used • Size is 14.6 acres & 26.34 acres
• Ge
neral plan designation is Regional Mixed-U sed and Community Park
• Current use is vacant
• Location is in District 2
160
ID# LU-2 | 505-060-16S, 505-060-42, 505-
060-41, 505-060-43, 505-060-34, 505-060-33
WANSP Designation
Neighborhood Mixed-Use & Community Park
Requested Designation
RMX & CMX
Shaw Shaw
161
ID# LU-3 | 504-030-18, 504-030-19
• Request by land owner
• Request to keep General Plan designation
• Size is 4.98 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Residential Urban Neighborhood • Current use is rural residential
• Location is in the County
162
ID# LU-3 | 504-030-18, 504-030-19
WANSP Designation
Low Density Residential
Requested Designation
Residential Urban Neighborhood
Bullard
Grantland
Bullard
Grantland
163
ID# LU-4 | Tract 6234
• Request by Century Communities
• Request to move park designation to subdivision outlots • Size is 5.18 acres
• G
eneral plan designation is Residential Medium Density
• Current use is under development
• Location is in the District 1
164
ID# LU-4 | Tract 6234
WANSP Designation
Neighborhood Park
Requested Designation
Move Park to Outlots
Dakota
Hayes
Hayes
Dakota
165