Exhibit M - Environmental Assessment T-6402/P21-06440/P22-00795/P21-06515 [9-23-2022] — Fresno City Council, November 17, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I
I
-5. ± -L
Area Mitigation - Rule 4601 VOC Limits
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
EF_Parking
150.00
100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
EF_Residential_Exterior
150.00

50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating
EF_Residential_Interior
150.00

50.00 tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Parking
150
100
tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Residential_Exterior
150
50 tblAreaCoating
Area_EF_Residential_Interior
150
50 tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
7/12/2023
6/9/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
6/14/2023
5/12/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
8/10/2022
7/8/2022
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
6/28/2023
5/26/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
6/29/2023
5/27/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
8/11/2022
7/9/2022
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
8/3/2022
7/1/2022
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
6/15/2023
5/13/2023
tblFleetMix
HHD

0.02 0.02
tblFleetMix
LDA

0.51 0.53
tblFleetMix
LDT1

0.05 0.21
tblFleetMix
LDT2

0.18 0.17
tblFleetMix
LHD1

0.03 1.1000e-003
tblFleetMix
LHD2

7.0060e-003

9.0000e-004
tblFleetMix
MCY

0.02 2.5000e-003
tblFleetMix
MDV

0.16 0.06
tblFleetMix
MH

3.0900e-003

1.9000e-003
tblFleetMix
MHD

0.01 8.5000e-003
tblFleetMix
OBUS

7.1700e-004

0.00 tblFleetMix
SBUS

1.5290e-003

4.0000e-004
tblFleetMix
UBUS

2.9100e-004

4.3000e-003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 2 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
T
i
-J-
A

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
28,000.00
43,632.00
tblLandUse
Population

80.00 86.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.14 4.55
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

6.28 3.86
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

7.32 6.74
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic

1.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic

1.75 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 3 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 4 r!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
-i-
i
mm

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1300

1.0029

0.9965

1.9300e-
003

0.0446

0.0466

0.0912

0.0166

0.0446

0.0611

0.0000
163.4313
163.4313

0.0274

2.3600e-
003
164.8191
2023

0.2366

0.7214

0.7943

1.5200e-
003

0.0185

0.0319

0.0504

4.9900e-
003

0.0305

0.0355

0.0000
129.0498
129.0498

0.0216

1.7300e-
003
130.1041
Maximum

0.2366

1.0029

0.9965

1.9300e-
003

0.0446

0.0466

0.0912

0.0166

0.0446

0.0611

0.0000
163.4313
163.4313

0.0274

2.3600e-
003
164.8191
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1300

1.0029

0.9965

1.9300e-
003

0.0446

0.0466

0.0912

0.0166

0.0446

0.0611

0.0000
163.4311
163.4311

0.0274

2.3600e-
003
164.8189
2023

0.2366

0.7214

0.7943

1.5200e-
003

0.0185

0.0319

0.0504

4.9900e-
003

0.0305

0.0355

0.0000
129.0497
129.0497

0.0216

1.7300e-
003
130.1040
Maximum

0.2366

1.0029

0.9965

1.9300e-
003

0.0446

0.0466

0.0912

0.0166

0.0446

0.0611

0.0000
163.4311
163.4311

0.0274

2.3600e-
003
164.8189
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 4 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 7-1-2022
9-30-2022

0.5699

0.5699
2 10-1-2022
12-31-2022

0.5670

0.5670
3 1-1-2023
3-31-2023

0.5144

0.5144
4 4-1-2023
6-30-2023

0.4386

0.4386
Highest

0.5699

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1949

0.0129

0.2128

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

12.4702

5.6000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.5505
Energy

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

32.2008

2.3000e-
003

6.1000e-
004

32.4388
Mobile

0.0553

0.1027

0.6492

1.7600e-
003

0.1839

1.2900e-
003

0.1852

0.0490

1.2100e-
003

0.0502

0.0000
166.8440
166.8440

0.0125

8.3100e-
003
169.6325
Waste

0.0000

2.6145

0.0000

2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Water

0.0000

0.5788

1.2858

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Total

0.2523

0.1332

0.8694

1.9500e-
003

0.1839

4.7100e-
003

0.1887

0.0490

4.6300e-
003

0.0537

3.1933
212.8008
215.9941

0.2296

0.0106
224.8807
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 5 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1949

0.0129

0.2128

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

12.4702

5.6000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.5505
Energy

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

32.2008

2.3000e-
003

6.1000e-
004

32.4388
Mobile

0.0546

0.0976

0.6160

1.6500e-
003

0.1712

1.2100e-
003

0.1725

0.0457

1.1300e-
003

0.0468

0.0000
155.6952
155.6952

0.0119

7.8700e-
003
158.3370
Waste

0.0000

2.6145

0.0000

2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Water

0.0000

0.5788

1.2858

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Total

0.2516

0.1281

0.8362

1.8400e-
003

0.1712

4.6300e-
003

0.1759

0.0457

4.5500e-
003

0.0502

3.1933
201.6520
204.8453

0.2289

0.0101
213.5853
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Grading
Grading
7/1/2022
7/8/2022
5 6
2 Building Construction
Building Construction
7/9/2022
5/12/2023
5 220
3 Paving
Paving
5/13/2023
5/26/2023
5 10
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.28 3.82

3.82 5.64

6.90 1.70

6.77 6.91

1.73 6.45

0.00 5.24

5.16 0.27

4.16 5.02
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 6 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
■*
■*
I
I
I
■L ■L
4 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
5/27/2023
6/9/2023
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 8.00
9 0.56
Building Construction
Cranes
1 8.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
2 7.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Residential Indoor: 88,355; Residential Outdoor: 29,452; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 2,528 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0.97
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 7 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
I- h
Ji

3.2 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0213

0.0000

0.0213

0.0103

0.0000

0.0103

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

4.6200e-
003

0.0510

0.0277

6.0000e-
005

2.2300e-
003

2.0500e-
003

0.0000

5.4308

1.7600e-
003

0.0000

5.4747
Total

4.6200e-
003

0.0510

0.0277

6.0000e-
005

0.0213

2.2300e-
003

0.0235

0.0103

2.0500e-
003

0.0123

0.0000

5.4308

1.7600e-
003

0.0000

5.4747
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Building Construction
8 38.00

10.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 8.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 8 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied V + V- f T f -+ ■ + ■+
i i i
i i i
■ i ■
■
-*
■

3.2 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1961

1.0000e-
005

0.1980
Total

1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1961

1.0000e-
005

0.1980
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0213

0.0000

0.0213

0.0103

0.0000

0.0103

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

4.6200e-
003

0.0510

0.0277

6.0000e-
005

2.2300e-
003

2.0500e-
003

0.0000

5.4308

1.7600e-
003

0.0000

5.4747
Total

4.6200e-
003

0.0510

0.0277

6.0000e-
005

0.0213

2.2300e-
003

0.0235

0.0103

2.0500e-
003

0.0123

0.0000

5.4308

1.7600e-
003

0.0000

5.4747
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 9 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*

3.2 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1961

1.0000e-
005

0.1980
Total

1.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1961

1.0000e-
005

0.1980
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1160

0.9128

0.8971

1.5600e-
003

0.0439

0.0421

0.0000
129.8001
129.8001

0.0250

0.0000
130.4261
Total

0.1160

0.9128

0.8971

1.5600e-
003

0.0439

0.0421

0.0000
129.8001
129.8001

0.0250

0.0000
130.4261
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 10 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
-*
;:

3.3 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

1.2900e-
003

0.0337

9.5400e-
003

1.3000e-
004

4.1400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

4.5100e-
003

1.2000e-
003

3.5000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

12.4806

9.0000e-
005

1.8800e-
003

13.0433
Worker

7.9900e-
003

5.4500e-
003

0.0614

1.7000e-
004

0.0190

1.0000e-
004

0.0191

5.0500e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.1400e-
003

0.0000

15.5238

5.1000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

15.6769
Total

9.2800e-
003

0.0392

0.0709

3.0000e-
004

0.0231

4.6000e-
004

0.0236

6.2500e-
003

4.4000e-
004

6.6800e-
003

0.0000

28.0043

6.0000e-
004

2.3500e-
003

28.7202
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1160

0.9128

0.8971

1.5600e-
003

0.0439

0.0421

0.0000
129.7999
129.7999

0.0250

0.0000
130.4260
Total

0.1160

0.9128

0.8971

1.5600e-
003

0.0439

0.0421

0.0000
129.7999
129.7999

0.0250

0.0000
130.4260
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 11 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
;:

3.3 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

1.2900e-
003

0.0337

9.5400e-
003

1.3000e-
004

4.1400e-
003

3.6000e-
004

4.5100e-
003

1.2000e-
003

3.5000e-
004

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

12.4806

9.0000e-
005

1.8800e-
003

13.0433
Worker

7.9900e-
003

5.4500e-
003

0.0614

1.7000e-
004

0.0190

1.0000e-
004

0.0191

5.0500e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.1400e-
003

0.0000

15.5238

5.1000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

15.6769
Total

9.2800e-
003

0.0392

0.0709

3.0000e-
004

0.0231

4.6000e-
004

0.0236

6.2500e-
003

4.4000e-
004

6.6800e-
003

0.0000

28.0043

6.0000e-
004

2.3500e-
003

28.7202
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0814

0.6471

0.6752

1.1900e-
003

0.0292

0.0279

0.0000

98.6585

0.0187

0.0000

99.1249
Total

0.0814

0.6471

0.6752

1.1900e-
003

0.0292

0.0279

0.0000

98.6585

0.0187

0.0000

99.1249
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 12 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
-*
;:

3.3 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.1000e-
004

0.0209

6.2500e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.1500e-
003

1.3000e-
004

3.2800e-
003

9.1000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.0400e-
003

0.0000

9.1355

5.0000e-
005

1.3800e-
003

9.5465
Worker

5.5900e-
003

3.6200e-
003

0.0427

1.2000e-
004

0.0144

7.0000e-
005

0.0145

3.8400e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
003

0.0000

11.4907

3.5000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

11.5974
Total

6.1000e-
003

0.0245

0.0489

2.2000e-
004

0.0176

2.0000e-
004

0.0178

4.7500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

4.9400e-
003

0.0000

20.6262

4.0000e-
004

1.7100e-
003

21.1439
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0814

0.6471

0.6752

1.1900e-
003

0.0292

0.0279

0.0000

98.6584

0.0187

0.0000

99.1248
Total

0.0814

0.6471

0.6752

1.1900e-
003

0.0292

0.0279

0.0000

98.6584

0.0187

0.0000

99.1248
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 13 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
■*
;:

3.3 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.1000e-
004

0.0209

6.2500e-
003

1.0000e-
004

3.1500e-
003

1.3000e-
004

3.2800e-
003

9.1000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

1.0400e-
003

0.0000

9.1355

5.0000e-
005

1.3800e-
003

9.5465
Worker

5.5900e-
003

3.6200e-
003

0.0427

1.2000e-
004

0.0144

7.0000e-
005

0.0145

3.8400e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
003

0.0000

11.4907

3.5000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

11.5974
Total

6.1000e-
003

0.0245

0.0489

2.2000e-
004

0.0176

2.0000e-
004

0.0178

4.7500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

4.9400e-
003

0.0000

20.6262

4.0000e-
004

1.7100e-
003

21.1439
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.4000e-
003

0.0431

0.0584

9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

7.7564

2.4600e-
003

0.0000

7.8179
Paving

1.0300e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Total

5.4300e-
003

0.0431

0.0584

9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

7.7564

2.4600e-
003

0.0000

7.8179
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 14 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
■*
;:
;:

3.4 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.3000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.4775

1.0000e-
005

0.4819
Total

2.3000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.4775

1.0000e-
005

0.4819
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.4000e-
003

0.0431

0.0584

9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

7.7564

2.4600e-
003

0.0000

7.8178
Paving

1.0300e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Total

5.4300e-
003

0.0431

0.0584

9.0000e-
005

2.1700e-
003

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

7.7564

2.4600e-
003

0.0000

7.8178
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 15 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*

3.4 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.3000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.4775

1.0000e-
005

0.4819
Total

2.3000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.4775

1.0000e-
005

0.4819
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.1424

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.6000e-
004

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

0.1433

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 16 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
-*

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Total

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.1424

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.6000e-
004

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Total

0.1433

6.5100e-
003

9.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2785
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 17 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
-*
;:
;:

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Total

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 18 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*
■*
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0546

0.0976

0.6160

1.6500e-
003

0.1712

1.2100e-
003

0.1725

0.0457

1.1300e-
003

0.0468

0.0000
155.6952
155.6952

0.0119

7.8700e-
003
158.3370
Unmitigated

0.0553

0.1027

0.6492

1.7600e-
003

0.1839

1.2900e-
003

0.1852

0.0490

1.2100e-
003

0.0502

0.0000
166.8440
166.8440

0.0125

8.3100e-
003
169.6325

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
188.72
127.40
108.08
493,474
459,424
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

0.00 0.00

0.00 Parking Lot

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
188.72
127.40
108.08
493,474
459,424
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Low Rise

10.80 7.30

7.50 48.40

15.90 35.70
86 11
3 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Parking Lot

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise

0.530500

0.205800

0.167300

0.055000

0.001100

0.000900

0.008500

0.021800

0.000000

0.004300

0.002500

0.000400

0.001900
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

0.510058

0.053037

0.175964

0.161396

0.026773

0.007006

0.013819

0.022114

0.000717

0.000291

0.024206

0.001529

0.003090
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 19 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -t
*
I- i!h +
i I I
i
i
T T
i
i

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
l l l l l
i i i i i
■+
A
Parking Lot

0.510058

0.053037

0.175964

0.161396

0.026773

0.007006

0.013819

0.022114

0.000717

0.000291

0.024206

0.001529

0.003090

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

11.8096

1.9100e-
003

2.3000e-
004

11.9264
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

11.8096

1.9100e-
003

2.3000e-
004

11.9264
NaturalGas
Mitigated

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

20.3912

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

20.5124
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

20.3912

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

20.5124

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 20 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
382117

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

20.3912

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

20.5124
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

20.3912

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

20.5124
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 21 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
■* - -

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

20.3912

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

20.5124
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.0600e-
003

0.0176

7.4900e-
003

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

20.3912

3.9000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

20.5124
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 22 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
■* - -

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
115669

10.7021

1.7300e-
003

2.1000e-
004

10.8079
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
11970

1.1075

1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

1.1185
Total

11.8096

1.9100e-
003

2.3000e-
004

11.9264
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 23 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
115669

10.7021

1.7300e-
003

2.1000e-
004

10.8079
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
11970

1.1075

1.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

1.1185
Total

11.8096

1.9100e-
003

2.3000e-
004

11.9264
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 24 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.1949

0.0129

0.2128

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

12.4702

5.6000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.5505
Unmitigated

0.1949

0.0129

0.2128

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

12.4702

5.6000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.5505

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0142

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1731

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

1.2300e-
003

0.0105

4.4600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

8.5000e-
004

0.0000

12.1298

2.3000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.2019
Landscaping

6.3000e-
003

2.4000e-
003

0.2083

1.0000e-
005

1.1500e-
003

0.0000

0.3404

3.3000e-
004

0.0000

0.3486
Total

0.1949

0.0129

0.2128

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

12.4702

5.6000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.5505
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 25 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -t

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0142

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1731

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

1.2300e-
003

0.0105

4.4600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

8.5000e-
004

0.0000

12.1298

2.3000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.2019
Landscaping

6.3000e-
003

2.4000e-
003

0.2083

1.0000e-
005

1.1500e-
003

0.0000

0.3404

3.3000e-
004

0.0000

0.3486
Total

0.1949

0.0129

0.2128

8.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

0.0000

12.4702

5.6000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

12.5505
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 26 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
■*
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Unmitigated

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.82431 /

1.15011

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 27 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.82431 /

1.15011

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.8646

0.0597

1.4300e-
003

3.7817
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 28 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Unmitigated

2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

12.88 2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 29 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

12.88 2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.6145

0.1545

0.0000

6.4774
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 30 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/1/2022 2:41 PM

Page 31 of 31 ends

Palms at Alluvial - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Appendices
Palms at Alluvial
September 23, 2022 B-1
Appendix B: Biological Evaluation

455 W Fir Avenue
Clovis, CA 93611-0242
Tel: (559) 449-2700
Fax: (559) 449-2715
www.provostandpritchard.com
Engineering  Surveying  Planning  Environmental  GIS  Construction Services  Hydrogeology  Consulting Clovis  Bakersfield  Visalia  Modesto  Los Banos  Chico • Sacramento Memorandum
To: Stallion Development & Construction
From: Provost & Prichard: Roman Endicott, Intern Biologist and Shaylea Stark, Biologist Subject: Biological Review of the Stallion Development and Construction Project Date: April 19, 2022
Biological Review
The Project’s Area of Potential Effect (APE) that was reviewed for biological resources consisted of approximately three acres with an additional 50 -foot buffer surrounding the Project (see Attachment A). The topography is relatively flat across the San Joaquin Valley Floor and the APE is situated at approximately 3 00 feet in elevation in a n urbanized area within the City of Fresno. The entire APE lies on a dirt lot adjacent to a pre -existing parking lot and residential neighborhoods. The existing roadway adjacent to the APE is paved.

Methodology
A thorough search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Information for Planning, Consultation (IPaC), and iNaturalist were reviewed for potential special status plant and animal species that may be found in and around the APE. The CNDDB search included the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) areas encompassing the Clovis 7.5-minute quadrangle that contain the APE in its entirety, and for the eight surrounding quadrangles: Lanes Bridge, Friant, Academy, Round Mountain, Sanger, Malaga, Fresno South, and Fresno North. The full CNDDB and IPaC species list can be found in Attachment B and Attachment C at the end of this document. No field survey was conducted. Viewing of the APE was achieved utilizing satellite imagery.

Special Status Species
There are 35 special status animal species and 16 special status plant species found within the nine-quad search. Species found within three miles of the APE includes six species which are explained further in Tables 1 and 2 below. This list excludes observations with unknown occurrence locations that were mapped to the center of Fresno as a best guess by CNDDB.

EST. 1068

PROVOST&

PRITCHARD

CONSULTING GROUP
An Employee Owned Company
To Stallion Development and Construction 4/19/22
Biological Resources Page 2 of 6
Table 1. List of Special Status Animals with Potential to Occur Onsite and/or in the Vicinity.

Species Status Habitat Occurrence on APE
California
tiger
salamander
(Ambystoma
californiense)

FT, CT,
CWL
Requires vernal pools or seasonal
ponds for breeding and small
mammal burrows for aestivation.

Generally found in grassland and
oak savannah plant communities
in central California from sea level
to 1500 feet in elevation.

Absent. Suitable vernal pool and upland
habitat for this species is absent from the
APE. Both recorded observations within three
miles of the APE are considered to be
extirpated.

Monarch
butterfly
(Danaus
plexippus)
FC
Winter roost sites extend along
the coast from northern
Mendocino to Baja California,
Mexico. Roosts located in wind-
protected tree groves (eucalyptus,
Monterey pine, cypress), with
nectar and water sources nearby.

Unlikely. Overwintering roost sites are absent
from the APE. Marginal vegetation is present
and would not provide optimal foraging
habitat. There are no recorded observations
within the nine quad search and the closest
observation on iNaturalist was approximately
five miles away.

Tricolored
blackbird
(Agelaius
tricolor)

CT, CSC
Nests colonially near fresh water
in dense cattails or tules, or in
thickets of riparian shrubs.

Forages in grassland and
cropland. Large colonies are often
found on dairy farm forage fields.

Absent. Suitable wetland habitat is absent
from the APE and surrounding area. Nesting
and foraging would not be supported.

Western pond
turtle (Emys
marmorata)
CSC
An aquatic turtle of ponds,
marshes, slow-moving rivers,
streams, and irrigation ditches
with riparian vegetation. Requires
adequate basking sites and sandy
banks or grassy open fields to
deposit eggs.

Unlikely. Nesting and foraging habitat is
absent from the APE. The nearest surface
waters are an underground canal adjacent to
the APE and a recharge basin a half mile west.

Nesting and foraging habitat is fragmented and
likely would not support this species.

Table 2. List of Special Status Plants with Potential to Occur Onsite and/or in the Vicinity.

Species Status Habitat Occurrence on APE
San Joaquin
Valley Orcutt
grass
(Orcuttia
inaequalis)

FT, CE,
CNPS 1B
Found in the eastern San Joaquin
Valley and the Sierra Nevada
foothills in vernal pools within
valley grassland, freshwater
wetland, and wetland-riparian
communities at elevations below
2600 feet. Blooms April –
September.

Absent. Suitable habitat and soil for the
species is absent from the APE. The only
recorded occurrence of this species in the area
is considered to be extirpated.

Sanford’s
arrowhead
(Sagittaria
sanfordii)
CNPS 1B
Found in the San Joaquin Valley
and other parts of California in
freshwater-marsh, primarily
ponds and ditches, at elevations
below 1000 feet. Blooms May–
October.

Absent: Suitable habitat and soil for this
species is absent from the APE. The last
observation within three miles of the APE was
in recorded in 1954. The site was searched
again in 1980 and the species was not found.

Succulent
owl’s-clover
(Castilleja
campestris
var.
succulenta)

FT, CE,
CNPS 1B
Found in vernal pools, often in
acidic soils at elevations below
2500 feet. Blooms April – July.

Absent: Suitable habitat and soil for this
species is absent from the APE. The nearest
observation approximately three miles away in
1938 is now considered to be possibly
extirpated due to the site being disced in 1981.

To Stallion Development and Construction 4/19/22
Biological Resources Page 3 of 6

EXPLANATION OF OCCURRENCE DESIGNATIONS AND STATUS CODES

Present: Species observed on the site at time of field surveys or during recent past.

Likely: Species not observed on the site, but it may reasonably be expected to occur there on a regular basis.

Possible: Species not observed on the site, but it could occur there from time to time.

Unlikely: Species not observed on the site, and would not be expected to occur there except, perhaps, as a transient.

Absent: Species not observed on the site and precluded from occurring there due to absence of suitable habitat.

STATUS CODES
FT Federally Threatened CE California Endangered
FC Federal Candidate CT California Threatened
CSC California Species of Concern

CNPS LISTING
1B Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and elsewhere.

Designated Habitat and Communities
The CDFW and USFWS often designates areas of “Critical Habitat” when it lists species as threatened or endangered. Critical Habitat is a specific geographic area that contains features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and would require special management or protection. According to CNDDB and IPaC, designated critical habitat is absent from the APE and vicinity.

CDFW also designates “natural communities of special concern” and are defined by distinguished, significant biological diversity, or a home to special status species. According to CNDDB Northern Claypan Vernal Pool is designated as a natural community of special concern and is located 2.5 miles west of the APE. Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool is designated as a natural community of special concern and is located is 4 miles northeast, 7 miles northwest, 7.5 miles north, 9 miles northwest, and 11 miles northwest of the APE. Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest is designated as a natural community of special concern and is located 5.5 miles north of the APE. Sycamore Alluvial Woodland is designated as a natural community of special concern and is located 6.5 miles north of the APE. These natural communities would not be impacted by the Project.

Wildlife Corridors
Wildlife movement corridors are routes that animals regularly and predictably fo llow during seasonal migration, dispersal from native ranges, daily travel within home ranges, and inter - population movements. Movement corridors in California are typically associated with valleys, ridgelines, and rivers and creeks supporting riparian veg etation. The APE does not contain features that would be likely to function as wildlife movement corridors. Further, the APE is heavily disturbed by human activities, which would discourage dispersal and migration.

Waters
The nearest surface waters are an unnamed canal that run s 300 feet west of the APE. A watershed is the topographic region that drains into a stream, river, or lake and can consist of many smaller subwatersheds. The James Bypass watershed is comprised of stormwater or snowmelt collected in upland areas which flows down into Tollhouse Creek, Sand Creek, North Fork Willow Creek, North Fork Little Dry Creek, and Little Dry Creek, which all run into Dry Creek.

Dry Creek then flows into the unnamed canal that runs adjacent to the APE. The APE lies within

To Stallion Development and Construction 4/19/22
Biological Resources Page 4 of 6
the James Bypass watershed; Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 1803000907 and the Gates Lake subwatershed; HUC: 180300090701.

Soils
One soil mapping unit representing a singular soil type was identified within the APE. Hanford fine sandy loam, clay loam substratum is found within 100 percent of the APE . It is well drained, has moderately rapid permeability and very low runoff. This soil is primarily used for agriculture , dairies, and urban development. None of the major or minor soil mapping units were identified as hydric. Hydric soils are defined as soils that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions such that under sufficiently wet conditions, hydrophytic vegetation can be supported.

The full soil report can be found in Attachment D at the end of this document.

Biotic Habitat
The APE is located within a residential and commerical area with disturbed dirt lots interspersed throughout the surrounding area.

Of the four regionally occurring special status animal species, all of them were found to be absent or unlikely to occur within the APE due to unsuitable habitat. As identified in Table 1, these species include: California tiger salamander, monarch butterfly, Tricolored Blackbird, and western pond turtle. Since it is unlikely these species would occur onsite, implementation of the Project would have no impact on these special status species through construction mortality, disturbance, or loss of habitat. Protection measures are not warranted.

All three regionally occurring special status plant species are considered absent from occurring in the A PE due to unsuitable soils and habitat. As identified in Table 2, these species include:

San Joaquin Valley orcutt grass, San ford’s arrowhead, and succulent owl’s-clover. Since it is unlikely that these species would occur onsite, implementation of the Project would have no impact on these three special status species through construction mortality, disturbance, or loss of habitat. Protection measures are not warranted.

The APE contains suitable nesting and/or foraging habitat for ground and tree nesting avian species.

The following Protective Measures are identified to address potential nesting birds in the APE.Protective Measures

1. The Project’s constr uction activities will occur, if feasible, between September 16 and January 31 (outside of nesting bird season) in an effort to avoid impacts to nesting birds.

2. If activities must occur within nesting bird season (February 1 to September 15), a qualified biologist would conduct a pre-construction survey for all nesting birds within the Project boundary and an additional 50 feet surrounding the Project, no more than 7 days prior to the start of construction. All raptor nests would be considered “active” upo n the nest - building stage.

3. On discovery of any active nests or breeding colonies near work areas, the qualified biologist will determine appropriate construction setback distances based on applicable CDFW and/or USFWS guidelines and/or the biology of the species in question.

Construction buffers will be identified with flagging, fencing, or other easily visible means,

To Stallion Development and Construction 4/19/22
Biological Resources Page 5 of 6
and will be maintained until the biologist has determined that the nestlings have fledged and are no longer dependent on the nest.

Summary of Review
Although there is a potential for construction impacts to plant and animal species, Project activities are within an urbanized area and are outside of suitable habitat for all of the identified special status plant and animal species. However, there are many bird species that are tolerant of human activities and may choose to nest within the APE. By adhering to the Protective Measures discussed above, there would be less than significant impacts to these species.

Protected habitats and natural communities, wildlife corridors, and waters of the State or United States are outside of the APE and would not be impacted by the Project.

If Project activities were to change or the Project APE were to be altered, an additional biological review may be necessary to determine any further potential biological impacts. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact us at [email protected] or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Roman Endicott
Intern Biologist

Attachments:

Attachment A - APE
Attachment B - CNDDB Species List
Attachment C - IPaC Species List
Attachment D - NRCS Soil Report

Attachment A - APE

Alluvial Ave
Willow Ave
0 150 300
Feet
Project Site (3.1 Acres)
Stallion Development
and Construction
Prepared By
o
\\ppeng.com\pzdata\clients\Stallion Development_XXXX\400 GIS\Map\Stallion_Palms_CEQA\Stallion_Palms_CEQA.aprxDate Exported: 4/5/2022 10:38 ~r~
l I*
* 'V • : 'T _• 0
IT ■v % * •
i
7 .*fi\y „1% y
*
-I1
f
Tl *
* *1
r-vs I
fr.r ...Ji
*
is *
is*. % V
fHi
£
hi •• 49&r* ’S1 <•4
TS1
J
V v«i.
,4 l'Si* i i•n
I
Ml*n
' -
r m *
|tr
■t
1a
V
i ■ 3
Rff a i~i
i -n
aJ
.■
“ ■ i«.♦
’ hlf:

A
f1
t
! Hi/m. zm i
i <. ■
13 ii
*
W: ;£>
>
*’ -* i
V
El
• > r*
! 3
5 **ii •ai
jVU.i.iLI 1 lI jr ■ I i i a i iwim
t7f(cr "
v
* 1
JO m

PROVOST&

PRITCHARD

Attachment B - CNDDB Species List

Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
American badger
Taxidea taxus
AMAJF04010
None
None
G5
S3
SSC
Antioch efferian robberfly
Efferia antiochi
IIDIP07010
None
None
G1G2
S1S2
black-crowned night heron
Nycticorax nycticorax
ABNGA11010
None
None
G5
S4
bristly sedge
Carex comosa
PMCYP032Y0
None
None
G5
S2
2B.1
burrowing owl
Athene cunicularia
ABNSB10010
None
None
G4
S3
SSC
California glossy snake
Arizona elegans occidentalis
ARADB01017
None
None
G5T2
S2
SSC
California horned lark
Eremophila alpestris actia
ABPAT02011
None
None
G5T4Q
S4
WL
California jewelflower
Caulanthus californicus
PDBRA31010
Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
California linderiella
Linderiella occidentalis
ICBRA06010
None
None
G2G3
S2S3
California satintail
Imperata brevifolia
PMPOA3D020
None
None
G4
S3
2B.1
California tiger salamander - central California DPS
Ambystoma californiense pop. 1
AAAAA01181
Threatened
Threatened
G2G3
S3
WL
coast horned lizard
Phrynosoma blainvillii
ARACF12100
None
None
G3G4
S3S4
SSC
Crotch bumble bee
Bombus crotchii
IIHYM24480
None
None
G3G4
S1S2
double-crested cormorant
Nannopterum auritum
ABNFD01020
None
None
G5
S4
WL
dwarf downingia
Downingia pusilla
PDCAM060C0
None
None
GU
S2
2B.2
forked hare-leaf
Lagophylla dichotoma
PDAST5J070
None
None
G2
S2
1B.1
Fresno kangaroo rat
Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
AMAFD03151
Endangered
Endangered
G3TH
SH
great egret
Ardea alba
ABNGA04040
None
None
G5
S4
Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest
Great Valley Mixed Riparian Forest
CTT61420CA
None
None
G2
S2.2
Query Criteria:

Quad IS (Clovis (3611976) OR Friant (3611986) OR Academy (3611985) OR Round Mountain (3611975) OR Sanger (3611965) OR Malaga (3611966) OR Fresno South (3611967) OR Fresno North (3611977) OR Lanes Bridge (3611987)) Report Printed on Thursday, March 31, 2022

Page 1 of 3 ends

Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Information Expires 8/27/2022
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
^ or risjf
S' •r'/ CALIFORNIA■<>
la
/
%
£
Ss^£teRsrG^
Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Greene's tuctoria
Tuctoria greenei
PMPOA6N010
Endangered
Rare
G1
S1
1B.1
hairy Orcutt grass
Orcuttia pilosa
PMPOA4G040
Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
hardhead
Mylopharodon conocephalus
AFCJB25010
None
None
G3
S3
SSC
Hartweg's golden sunburst
Pseudobahia bahiifolia
PDAST7P010
Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
AMACC05030
None
None
G3G4
S4
Hoover's calycadenia
Calycadenia hooveri
PDAST1P040
None
None
G2
S2
1B.3
Hurd's metapogon robberfly
Metapogon hurdi
IIDIP08010
None
None
G1G2
S1S2
least Bell's vireo
Vireo bellii pusillus
ABPBW01114
Endangered
Endangered
G5T2
S2
Madera leptosiphon
Leptosiphon serrulatus
PDPLM09130
None
None
G3
S3
1B.2
midvalley fairy shrimp
Branchinecta mesovallensis
ICBRA03150
None
None
G2
S2S3
moestan blister beetle
Lytta moesta
IICOL4C020
None
None
G2
S2
molestan blister beetle
Lytta molesta
IICOL4C030
None
None
G2
S2
Northern California legless lizard
Anniella pulchra
ARACC01020
None
None
G3
S3
SSC
Northern Claypan Vernal Pool
Northern Claypan Vernal Pool
CTT44120CA
None
None
G1
S1.1
Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool
Northern Hardpan Vernal Pool
CTT44110CA
None
None
G3
S3.1
pallid bat
Antrozous pallidus
AMACC10010
None
None
G4
S3
SSC
pincushion navarretia
Navarretia myersii ssp. myersii
PDPLM0C0X1
None
None
G2T2
S2
1B.1
San Joaquin adobe sunburst
Pseudobahia peirsonii
PDAST7P030
Threatened
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
San Joaquin kit fox
Vulpes macrotis mutica
AMAJA03041
Endangered
Threatened
G4T2
S2
San Joaquin pocket mouse
Perognathus inornatus
AMAFD01060
None
None
G2G3
S2S3
San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass
Orcuttia inaequalis
PMPOA4G060
Threatened
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
Report Printed on Thursday, March 31, 2022

Page 2 of 3 ends

Commercial Version -- Dated February, 27 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Information Expires 8/27/2022
Selected Elements by Common Name
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
^ or risjf
S' •r'/ CALIFORNIA■<>
la
/
%
£
Ss^£teRsrG^
Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Sanford's arrowhead
Sagittaria sanfordii
PMALI040Q0
None
None
G3
S3
1B.2
snowy egret
Egretta thula
ABNGA06030
None
None
G5
S4
spiny-sepaled button-celery
Eryngium spinosepalum
PDAPI0Z0Y0
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
spotted bat
Euderma maculatum
AMACC07010
None
None
G4
S3
SSC
succulent owl's-clover
Castilleja campestris var. succulenta
PDSCR0D3Z1
Threatened
Endangered
G4?T2T3
S2S3
1B.2
Swainson's hawk
Buteo swainsoni
ABNKC19070
None
Threatened
G5
S3
Sycamore Alluvial Woodland
Sycamore Alluvial Woodland
CTT62100CA
None
None
G1
S1.1
tricolored blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
ABPBXB0020
None
Threatened
G1G2
S1S2
SSC
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
IICOL48011
Threatened
None
G3T2
S3
vernal pool fairy shrimp
Branchinecta lynchi
ICBRA03030
Threatened
None
G3
S3
western mastiff bat
Eumops perotis californicus
AMACD02011
None
None
G4G5T4
S3S4
SSC
western pond turtle
Emys marmorata
ARAAD02030
None
None
G3G4
S3
SSC
western ridged mussel
Gonidea angulata
IMBIV19010
None
None
G3
S1S2
western spadefoot
Spea hammondii
AAABF02020
None
None
G2G3
S3
SSC
western yellow-billed cuckoo
Coccyzus americanus occidentalis
ABNRB02022
Threatened
Endangered
G5T2T3
S1
Record Count: 55
Report Printed on Thursday, March 31, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

Attachment C - IPaC Species List

March 31, 2022
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
Phone: (916) 414-6600 Fax: (916) 414-6713
In Reply Refer To:

Project Code: 2022-0026789
Project Name: Stallion Development Project

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) ir.s.

FISH &WIUQUFE am'iriK
vt
<5
?h
;£■
3 “:-j
*ch a
03/31/2022 2

(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.

The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php.

In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.

03/31/2022 3

▪
Attachment(s):

Official Species List

03/31/2022 1

Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
(916) 414-6600

03/31/2022 2

Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0026789
Event Code: None
Project Name: Stallion Development Project
Project Type: New Constr - Above Ground
Project Description: New construction of an apartment complex on a vacant lot Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@36.8459454,-119.73226594042639,14z Counties: Fresno County, California
jnjCDm] 3
2*1? I-V.l-I.', j j
'5
~:
[ -■ i ■ : A<
'
U£9£
03/31/2022 3

1. Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 12 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS
Fresno Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys nitratoides exilis
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5150
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered
Birds

NAME STATUS
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus
Population: Western U.S. DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3911
Threatened
1 03/31/2022 4

Reptiles

NAME STATUS
Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Gambelia silus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/625
Endangered
Giant Garter Snake Thamnophis gigas
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4482
Threatened
Amphibians

NAME STATUS
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
Population: U.S.A. (Central CA DPS)
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened
Fishes

NAME STATUS
Delta Smelt Hypomesus transpacificus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/321
Threatened
Insects

NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
Crustaceans

NAME STATUS
Conservancy Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta conservatio
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8246
Endangered
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened

03/31/2022 5

Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS
Greene's Tuctoria Tuctoria greenei
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1573
Endangered
Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.

03/31/2022 6

IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Name: Roman Endicott
Address: 455 W. Fir Ave
City: Clovis
State: CA
Zip: 93611
Email [email protected]
Phone: 5594492700

Attachment D - NRCS Soil Report

United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Eastern Fresno
Area, California
Stallion Development Project
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
March 31, 2022
USDA
NRCS
9 Si
U.1
■ r
IF M
4gSd-i/ 1
k ► 1
1 .v. h
*y
\ ■-j%
* - VI> 4
‘.J'al
ij -rf• ■■ I
/ ■»
/iJOJfetS '
l«
mi i -i
iIT “V1
*
t
F1*.
*+
* *m\M*n
■ j
,d 1
*
■\ if *i
W^iii
r
I
n i
- i
■ :
. 1>V
1 lJS
■V=) '
z 1 r
|F ( ;-lfy
c«»
■in
C 1
*fi
V4i
l|
I'H
: 200 ft 31-L
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.

They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.

Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.

The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 Contents
Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Eastern Fresno Area, California......................................................................13 Hp—Hanford fine sandy loam, clay loam substratum................................. 13 References............................................................................................................15 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).

Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.

The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.

These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.

Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report
6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Custom Soil Resource Report
7 Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4081 160 4081 180 4081200 4081220 4081240 4081260 4081280 4081300 4081320 4081340 4081360 4081 140 4081 160 4081 180 4081200 4081220 4081240 4081260 4081280 4081300 4081320 4081340 4081360 256290 256310 256330 256350 256370 256390 256410 256430 256270 256290 256310 256330 256350 256370 256390 256410 256430 36° 50' 48'' N
119° 44' 0'' W
36° 50' 48'' N
119° 43' 53'' W
36° 50' 41'' N
119° 44' 0'' W
36° 50' 41'' N
119° 43' 53'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,100 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
.1
■1
V
i
f; • ■
14 1
i’
H.1
I
i
i ►*%'. «■ T’Lafc^ s*
■, >i
E1‘* i i
k»*vt 2
• § nil
if
!•
V * -.
■tl T r.^r
<■>
, *
srr* 3
Sgtfg 1
*s
\ ‘ P^V*
fV£
’
/
/m
t
I>
#1
k
*
/t
; '■ -
f ' ■
\sIn jj
m
/■
k*
m
■ T V
■#
‘ ,:rT-AiHit
i lafjs
iv
*■
' ui-j
1*5 «- >Tj
1 SJ
Ai- m*.
1 r« "m
is4~
VS
••
''n
TOJi
i ■ •;■■
ni MEj
m li
1 / i
U r
6ia.
w* *•■■
ii
r: m f■i r
t
r"i ■ i
A

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:

Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Eastern Fresno Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 3, 2021
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jan 21, 2021—Feb 1, 2021
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
10 ■ \ □ □
l \ I
%
& «$ © o at)
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Hp Hanford fine sandy loam, clay
loam substratum

3.1 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 3.1 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.

Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Custom Soil Resource Report
11 An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.

Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.

These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.

The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.

Custom Soil Resource Report
12 Eastern Fresno Area, California
Hp—Hanford fine sandy loam, clay loam substratum
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl5s
Elevation: 200 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
A - 0 to 16 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 16 to 36 inches: fine sandy loam
2C - 36 to 60 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.3 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed, loam surface
Percent of map unit: 15 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Down-slope shape: Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
13 Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
14 References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 15 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report
16 Appendices
Palms at Alluvial
September 23, 2022 C-1
Appendix C: Cultural Resources

City of Fresno
Stallion Development Project
Cultural Resources Information

Central California Information Center, CSU Stanislaus, California Historical Resources Information System: Record Search 22-084, dated March 7, 2022. • There have been no previous cultural resource studies conducted within the project area.
• There have been seven studies conducted within the one-half mile radius: FR-01006, 01223, 01844, 01880, 01946, 02318, & 02319.
• There are no recorded resources within the project area or within the one-half mile radius, and it is not known if any exist.
• There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.

Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC): Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request, dated May 9, 2022.
• A Record Search of the NAHC Sacred Lands File was completed for the Area of Potential Effect (APE) with negative results.
• A list of sixteen tribal contacts was provided by NAHC, and letters to each tribal contact listed were mailed out by the City of Fresno on June 24, 2022. • No additional responses or additional cultural information were received by the City of Fresno.

Assembly Bill 52 Consultation pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21080.3.1 and California Government Code Sections 65092, 65351, 65352, 65352.3, and 65352.4, formally known as Senate Bill (SB) 18
• A Tribal Consultation Notification Request Letter was sent out by t he City of Fresno via certified mail dated June 24, 2022, which included a Project Description, map of the APE and a Topo map.
• No correspondence has been received by the City of Fresno pursuant to the Tribal Consultation Notification Request Letters.

CHRIS – Cultural Record Search Results

To: Jacqueline Lancaster Record Search 22-084
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
400 E. Main St. Ste 300
Visalia, CA 93291

Date: March 7, 2022

Re: Stallion Development & Construction Palms at Alluvial Multifamily Residential Development

County: Fresno

Map(s): Clovis 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH

The California O ffice of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical R esources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, res earchers, and t he public. Re commendations mad e by IC coordina tors or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the eval uation or opinion of the State Hi storic Preserva tion Officer in carrying out t he O HP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include kno wn and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, a nd resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State His torical L andmarks, Calif ornia Register of Historical Resources, Calif ornia Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been sub mitted to the OHP are availa ble via this rec ords search. Addi tional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-QUARTER MILE RADIUS

According to the information in our files, there has been no previous cultural re source studies in the project area. There have been seven studies conducted within the one -half mile radius : FR-01006, 01223, 01844, 01880, 01946, 02318, & 02319.

Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center
California State University, Bakersfield
Mail Stop: 72 DOB
9001 Stockdale Highway
Bakersfield, California 93311-1022
(661)654-2289
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.csub.edu/ssjvic
-
California
Historical
Resources
J_n formation
_S y stem
Fresno
Kern
Kings
Madera
Tulare
ft
■'
. • 'o
Recor
d Search 22-084

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-QUARTER MILE RADIUS
There a
re no r ecorded resources within the project area. There are no recorded resources within the one-half mile radius.

There are no recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register o f Hi storic Places , the California Register of H istorical Resources, t he Cali fornia Points o f Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
W
e understand this project intends to develop a multifamily residential 28-dwelling unit and associated entitlements. Further, we understand the current land use is vacant with no structures on site. Because none of the project area has been previously studied for cultural resources, it is unknown if any are present. As such, prior to ground disturbance activ ities, we recommend a qualified, professional consultant conduct a field survey of the project area to determine if cultural resources are present. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We al so recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will p rovide you wi th a current li st of N ative American i ndividuals/organizations that can assist yo u wi th information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The C ommission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any , exist within this pr oject area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, ple a se consult wi th t he lead agency on this projec t t o deter mine if any other cultural resource inv estigation is r equired. If you need any additional informat ion or have a ny questi ons or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Je
remy E David, Assistant Coordinator Date: March 7, 2022 Please note t
hat invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

NAHC – Sacred Lands File Search Results

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 1 ends

May 9, 2022

Jackie Lancaster
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group

Via Email to: [email protected]

Re: Stallion Development & Construction Multifamily Residential Development Project, Fresno County

Dear Mr. Lancaster:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Cameron Vela
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok/Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

eR'CA/v
AA'
A
!Z
*
%
ddJvuiSL&yt' l/oAz,
Big Sandy Rancheria of
Western Mono Indians
Elizabeth Kipp, Chairperson
P.O. Box
337

Auberry, CA,
93602
Phone: (
559
)
374
-
0066
Fax: (
559
)
374-0055
[email protected]
Western Mono
Cold Springs Rancheria of
Mono Indians
Carol Bill, Chairperson
P.O. Box
209

Tollhouse, CA,
93667
Phone: (
559
)
855
-
5043
Fax: (
559
)
855-4445
[email protected]
Mono
Cold Springs Rancheria of
Mono Indians
Jared Aldern,
P. O. Box
209

Tollhouse, CA,
93667
Phone: (
559
)
855
-
5043
Fax: (
559
)
855-4445
[email protected]
Mono
Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal
Government
Robert Ledger, Chairperson
2191
West Pico Ave.

Fresno, CA,
93705
Phone: (
559
)
540
-
6346
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Mono
Kings River Choinumni Farm
Tribe
Stan Alec,
3515
East Fedora Avenue
Fresno, CA,
93726
Phone: (
559
)
647
-
3227
Foothill Yokut
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Katherine Perez, Chairperson
P.O. Box
717

Linden, CA,
95236
Phone: (
209
)
887
-
3415
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Timothy Perez,
P.O. Box
717

Linden, CA,
95236
Phone: (
209
)
662
-
2788
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
Picayune Rancheria of
Chukchansi Indians
Heather Airey, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box
2226

Oakhurst, CA,
93644
Phone: (
559
)
795
-
5986
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Picayune Rancheria of
Chukchansi Indians
Claudia Gonzales, Chairwoman
P.O. Box
2226

Oakhurst, CA,
93644
Phone: (
559
)
412
-
5590
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Table Mountain Rancheria
Bob Pennell, Cultural Resource
Director
P.O. Box
410

Friant, CA,
93626
Phone: (
559
)
325
-
0351
Fax: (
559
)
325-0394
[email protected]
Yokut
Table Mountain Rancheria
Brenda Lavell, Chairperson
P.O. Box
410

Friant, CA,
93626
Phone: (
559
)
822
-
2587
Fax: (
559
)
822-2693
[email protected]
Yokut
Traditional Choinumni Tribe
David Alvarez, Chairperson
2415
E. Houston Avenue
Fresno, CA,
93720
Phone: (
559
)
217
-
0396
Fax: (
559
)
292-5057
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
1 of 2
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5
of
the Health and Safety Code, Section
5097.94
of the Public Resource Section
5097.98
of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Stallion Development & Construction Multifamily Residential Development Project, Fresno County.

PROJ-2022-
002503
05/09/2022 02:15 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Fresno County
5/9/2022

Tule River Indian Tribe
Joey Garfield, Tribal Archaeologist
P. O. Box
589

Porterville, CA,
93258
Phone: (
559
)
783
-
8892
Fax: (
559
)
783-8932
joey.garfield@tulerivertribe-
nsn.gov
Yokut
Tule River Indian Tribe
Kerri Vera, Environmental
Department
P. O. Box
589

Porterville, CA,
93258
Phone: (
559
)
783
-
8892
Fax: (
559
)
783-8932
[email protected]
Yokut
Tule River Indian Tribe
Neil Peyron, Chairperson
P.O. Box
589

Porterville, CA,
93258
Phone: (
559
)
781
-
4271
Fax: (
559
)
781-4610
[email protected]
Yokut
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom
Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179
Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA,
93906
Phone: (
831
)
443
-
9702
kwood
8934
@aol.com
Foothill Yokut
Mono
2 of 2
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5
of
the Health and Safety Code, Section
5097.94
of the Public Resource Section
5097.98
of the Public Resources Code.

PROJ-2022-
002503
05/09/2022 02:15 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Fresno County
5/9/2022

AB 52 and SB 18 Tribal Consultation

Appendices
Palms at Alluvial
September 23, 2022 D-1
Appendix D: Vehicle Miles Traveled Memo

Tool Version: Report Date: 5/18/2022
Name:

Jurisdiction
TAZ ID
Single-family: 0 DU Multi-family: 28 DU
Total: 28 DU Percent Affordable: 0 %
Non-Residential Office: 0 EMP Others: TSF
Included
in the project TDM Quantification
% VMT/Capita
Reduction
% VMT/Employment
Reduction
No N/A
No N/A

11.1 County VMT / Capita: 16.1
Significant Impact: No
Project VMT Results
Residential
Project's VMT/Capita (11.1) is less than County VMT/Capita (14.0 using 13% as threshold) Project VMT per Capita:

Project VMT per Capita with TDM
Measures:

11.1 Significant Impact with
TDM measures: No
Project TDM measures (VMT reduction strategies)
Fresno COG Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Tool Summary Report Version 1.38
Project Information
Palms at Alluvial
Fresno
1495
Project Land Use
Residential
TDM Strategy
Implement Project Specific Vanpool Program
Implement Project Specific Carpool Program

17.5 11.1 11.1

13.1 16.1
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
TAZ Project Project + TDM
VMT per Capita
County Average
Fresno Council
of Governments
l......■
Appendices
Palms at Alluvial
September 23, 2022 E-1
Appendix E: Development Plans

I I I
I I I II1

I I II I(E) (E) (E)
(E)SFR SFR SFR (E)(E)SFR o SFRSFR o Ml
46'-0" 44' 3" vT 45'-0" 82'-0" 8
O
o
*
a
t20
2 BDRM.
2 BDRM.
o
I
(E) MULTI-FAMILY

DWELLING UNITS
~o
14 Ml a;J 13 10 12 9 11
C3
I
CN1
A‘jig
00 *Jfe
»: ■?15
ri
@©c5
3 BDRM. CO
24I
7'-0"28 23CM58
i
23 I
n
o
ii i f /T\
'O
CO 23 TyT7NIL
21CO
-4 Egg* 45'-0' /35o
©
18'-0"CO
I
CSI
13 12 822 ~
4 wgl I 10'-5"
2t§Jlr\I3 BDRM. \
40 -L3 BDRM. 2 BDRM.
c
1822
Pool 816 28 40'x25'O ^3 *5?5
i ^3
CN1 CD
^300 I
6,-0" y19
4g'-n"7 ’ 27'-0"c6'-0"
717 i ■
Bocce Ball 6'-1"3 BDRM.
<3 O
2 BDRM. mw 2 BDRM. o
I\l
i 22177.5 *
1'
■m\ 28 Ar 207\
f
+ J @ @ ©
/ \
Co s 40 2 BDRM.co
CO mt
© „ 13MD" -r
Jr’
<3 I
3 BDRM.CO
<rJ £
64'-0"
7 24'-0" CO "77
I 6
i
177'-7"
o
' i-
s-m10 (E) MULTI-FAMILY
DWELLING UNITS4 52 BDRM.y
2848 43 v52
nUL-d d =L=L=. 22
3 BDRM.42 21co
Co
Existing Hospice Facility
2792 E. Alluvial Ave.
1-Story, 24 Beds
16,547 Sq. Ft.

Co
l
CD
i
<■
m723)-----c a 22
> 18'-0" ,'o
*
CM
iHk2 BDRM. 5
4 f.. .c a
©ft I
gp-
- ~ i
5'-0" 1 \?3 —I
i
Co 5'-0"
5'-5"
3 BDRM.CO
NO
2 BDRM.
1ii (©II +
C 3 5'40"X3
::z>
23©-
r©
? -4^: 5*5"
CD
I CD
O'-
3 L
CM
c a co
A 24
A
V 18'-0" 4
Co
2 BDRM.I©31'-0"co
Co 3 BDRM.
■■■
5'-0"
I
5 ©
/ 18'-0"4 = 2 BDRM.oo« 23
, Q
5O' 00
3 -
i
28 24 2
L2!i'-0"
3 BDRM.I A
l▼h
1 r 251.

CO
CM
2 BDRM.ee14 22
1◄— 26
126 CO
4 I
+ ^A51#CD
dZ
■*
r
-►-d c 2 BDRM.s s s
16 5'-0"
4 % ■C; s o
ox
(E)X-10
4 ©
!> SFR
^T1 rn 2 BDRM.// 23 2 4'-61
M. Y 16'-0" 16'-0" y ,
r
-o7 \C -v^j- ^
27 :"re4o
4ft
◄— 4 •
-©28'-1"2: 33/ c28
;■
r* '
©
5959 -ts
B
ft CM2 ft
£ • - 10'-1"2 BDRM.30'-0" i
1 18'-0"
ftd 8'-0"
2 1
• 16-0"‘ 16--C9'-6",
-©0E
■
uA
l-0",' ▲
fti !T 6'-0"
SETBAC
37%Rft
Jin 13;KH \tnr 151.1 O'177.8' CM
-©if
O

EAST L A VENUE
19 3 BDRM. 2 BDRM. 3 BDRM. 3 BDRM.
g EAST DECATUR AVE
m

EAST CROMWELL AVE
O
7]
I

EAST EL PASO AVET)
>
C
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR
(E)
SFR

PROJECT

LOCATION

EAST ALLUVIAL AVE
-W
Vicinity Map
31,312 sq. ft. 43,632 sq. ft.
‘Approximate Building Areas. Subject
to change per final unit plan designs
52 N
W E
Project Areas* Project DirectoryProposed Site Plan s
Developer/General
Contractor:

Stallion Development & Construction
811 Barstow Ave
Clovis, CA 93612
Ph: (559) 440-9999
[email protected]
Lie. #1001656
r = 30'-0M Unit Gross
Area Type
2b 1,464 sq. ft.
3b 1,684 sq. ft.

Architect: Crawford Architecture & Planning
1755 Herndon Ave, Ste 103
Clovis, CA 93611
Ph: (559) 977-9779
[email protected]
Lie. #C-38643
Totals
128,859 sq. ft. (2.96 ac)Area of Property:

33.9%Building Coverage:

L
Crawford
Architecture
& Planning

PROJECT
The Palms
at Alluvial
2806 £ 2820 E Alluvial Ave
Clovis, CA 93611
NOTES:

Nov 10, 2021
21034
DATE
PROJECT NO.

REVISION DATE
Site Plans -
Existing/Demo
and Proposed
1" = 30'SCALE
A0.1
7 (E)
SFR
6'-
■-0" 7VT
330.00’Q ^ 330.00'
Site Legend
DescriptionSymbol
Existing Curb/Gutter
Ln
N3
Street Centerline
Property Line
©^ Proposed Concrete
Pavement
(E) Area to demolished
Undeveloped
2806 E. ALLUVIAL A VE^56) Proposed Asphalt Concrete
d
Building Footprint
CMU Wall

SETBACK
Curb/Gutter
Mb
Path of Travel
Demo
Marked Fire Lane
r
JCl
Ci x45Id 10I I
I
©—
11 —(l3)
dd © H©lPVLl fl
q I4 7\\ 52 ft
©- Zft d -l-ft-
37 .X*X
t
Cl
Cl
Existing Hospice Facilityci
2792 E. Alluvial Ave.
1-Story, 24 Beds
16,547 Sq. Ft.
1 36
c a
*
d©
c a
CiCl
Cl
Mb
4i
* m 57) Ml +
c a
14 x
18 —H 55)5 /
c p
"
; / /
o
IT)
CM
)•
v.26
ft x
II\ Undeveloped
2820 E. ALLUVIAL A VE.
ftxxx
10 APN: 404-500-29C:

Ml
J *
45 C'~®
14 4 12
Z/7
S S r
©
* 10*
56 fl©-
14 rn 25 x, •
aX
^(Ddid11
K
ftft Xftftftft/13
ft©
*
55 V12
L^2_ APN: 404-500-20
©/
§ 56
US / Xp
fts
n JA
d^ftdftdZftZ^k 9 ) II
1 5 r©-' it
48 (55:
fl ____
16500' 165.00'
y.
f
1?
0©
o
10'-0" 2 3 54 46) ( 1 47 I
A O
S.B. XT
47 ^ *
:

EAST ALLUVIAL A VENUE
L
©
N
W E
Existing /Demo Site Plan s
r = 30'-0M
Heritage Crossing (Hospice
Facility) Parking
Existing Parking: 42
Proposed Parking: 48
Keynotes
Sym Description
©
Existing 35' drive approach to be relocated £ reduced to 30' wide. ©
Existing curb and gutter.
©
Existing city sidewalk.
©
Existing city street light.
©
Existing CMU wall.
©
Existing planter.
©
Existing stormwater retention.
©
Existing stormwater discharge.
©
Existing monument sign.

Existing paving.

Existing courtyard.

Existing natural gas generator and enclosure.

Existing trash enclosure.

New fire hydrant. Connect to existing water line on adjacent property.

New 6" concrete rolled curb.

New parking stall striping per City of Fresno parking manual.

New pavement per City of Fresno standard specifications.

New painted directional arrows.

New concrete valley gutter.

New on-site light pole.

New concrete sidewalk. 5% max slope in direction of travel, 2% max cross slope.

Existing angle parking to be adjusted for 90 degree parking.

New 40' drive approach.

New monument sign.

New drive access gates with electric motor.

New keypad for gate access.

New van-accessible parking stall per California Building Code, ADA, and City of Fresno parking manual.

New accessible parking stall per California Building Code, ADA, and City of Fresno parking manual.

New van-accessible parking stall sign.

New accessible parking tow-away sign.

New accessible curb ramp and detectable warning strip.

New pool.

New 7' tall split-face CMU fence.
©
New 36" wide steel gate with security screen, lever and egress hardware. Provide police-fire bypass lock box with XI core per Fresno Fire Department Policy 403.

New concrete landing - 2% max slope an any direction.

New 9' tall cabana with toilet room and shower.

New marked and painted fire lane per Fresno Fire Department standards.44 Indicates line of existing pavement. Area to be demolished and re-graded to blend with new portion of the site.

Existing 8" Detector Check Valve
Existing 2" Water Meter (Domestic)
Existing 2" RP device.

New 2" water loop for domestic water, fire sprinklers (NFPA 13R), and landscape irrigation to each unit. Note:

Water loop sizing to be determined; larger services may be necessary if not enough water pressure.

Existing Fire Department Connection location.

New sewer trunk line to tie into existing sewer trunk line @ adjacent property.

Existing fire hydrant location.

Relocate existing property line.

Existing 2" Water Meter (Irrigation)
Demolish portion of existing curb and planter.55
Demolish existing valley gutter.56
Remove existing light pole. Salvage for re-use.

New cluster mailbox per USPS.

Fire XI bypass hardware £click to enter radio frequency gate opening hardware.

Emergency Access Only gate sign, both sides of gate.
®
Graphic address directory per development policy G-002.

CVC 22658 Fire lane tow away warning sign.

Qty. Living
Area
Garage
Area
16 1,024 sq.ft. 440 sq. ft.
12 1,244 sq. ft. 440 sq. ft.
28 CU
c
03 Q
03 (_>
43 LLUVIA
The Palms Duplex Parking
Uncovered: 22
Covered: (All units have 2-car garages) 56
Total: 78
Total Living
Area
Total Gross
Area
16,384 sq. ft. 23,424 sq.ft.
14,928 sq. ft. 20,208 sq.ft.

NORTH WILLOW AVE,
NORTH PAULA AVE.
m
(/><
£
NORTH CHESTNUT AVE.

Fresno City CouncilNovember 17, 2022

Fresno City Council
November 17, 2022