Exhibit I - Environmental Assessment Comment Letters — Fresno City Council, June 29, 2023 (part 2 of 3)

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
FR-01742 2001 Archaeological Survey and Record Search for WorldCom Fresno 180 Aerial Project (800-25)
Sutch, Cordelia Pacific Legacy, Inc.

FR-01800 2002 Archaeological Survey and Architectural
Evaluation for the Peach Avenue Widening
Project, Belmont to Butler Avenues, Fresno
County, California
Nettles, Wendy M. and Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

Baloian, Mary Clark
FR-01850 2000 Nextel Communications Wireless
Telecommunications Service Facility, Fresno
County
Submitter - Nextel Billat, Lorna EarthTouch, LLC.

Site No. CA1813A/Chestnut
FR-01979 2003 Historic Property Survey for Fresno Unified School District, Proposed Elementary School
Site D-2 Fresno, California
Livingstone, David M. Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 10-005306, 10-005307, 10-005308, 10-005309, 10-005310, 10-005311,
10-005312, 10-005313, 10-005314,
10-005315, 10-005316, 10-005317,
10-005318, 10-005319, 10-005320,
10-005321, 10-005322, 10-005323,
10-005324, 10-005325, 10-005326,
10-005327, 10-005328, 10-005329,
10-005330, 10-005331, 10-005332,
10-005333, 10-005334, 10-005335,
10-005336
FR-02000 2003 Cultural Resources Survey and Inventory of the USDA Peach Avenue Property in Fresno,
California
Nettles, Wendy M. and Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

Baloian, Randy
10-005305
FR-02002 2000 Cultural Resources Survey Report for Level 3 Long Haul Fiber Optic Project: WS04
Connection to Fresno 3R Facility, in the City
of Fresno, Fresno County, California
Mason, Roger D. and Chambers Group, Inc.

Shepard, Richard S.
10-004513
FR-02073 2004 Environmental Assessment No. PW-2004-08
Acquire and Construct an Intermodal Facility
On the Southeast Corner of East Kings
Canyon and South Alder Avenues
City of Fresno, Public
Works Department
Fraser, Becky
FR-02076 2004 Historic Architecture Survey Report for the "Bungalow" Court Project, Fresno, California
Hattersley-Drayton, City of Fresno
Karana
10-005447, 10-005448, 10-005449,
10-005450, 10-005451, 10-005452,
10-005453, 10-005454
FR-02106 2005 Request for SHPO Review of FCC
Undertaking (FAT-0064 Kings Canyon +
Cedar)
Submitter - FAT- Parker, Lori D. AquAeTer, Inc.
0064 Kings Canyon +
Cedar
FR-02109 2005 Archaeological Survey for a Multi-Family and Single Family Homes Project (APN 472-021-
01), East Kings Canyon Road and South
Adler Avenue, Fresno, California
Brady, Jon L. J&R Environmental Services

Page 2 of 5 ends

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
FR-02143 2005 A Cultural and Paleontological Resources
Study for the KB Home Summit Hills Project
Kaptain, Neal and LSA Associates, Inc.

Matzen, Ben
Submitter - LSA
Project No. KBH540
FR-02169 2005 Records Search Results and Site Visit for Cricket Telecommunications Facility
Candidate FAT-040B (Butler/Willow), 5130
East Lane, Fresno, Fresno County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.

FR-02172 2006 New Tower Submission Packet, FCC Form
620 - Cedar-Butler, SC-10132B
Supernowicz, Dana E. EarthTouch, Inc.

FR-02172A 2006 Cultural Resources Study of the Cedar-Butler Project T-Mobile Site No. SC10132B 1530 S.

Pearl Street, Fresno, Fresno County,
California 93721
Historic Resoruce
Associates
Dana E. Supernowicz
FR-02192 2006 New Tower Submission Packet, FCC Form
620 - South Peach, SC-10122A
Billat, Lorna EarthTouch, Inc.

FR-02194 2005 Cultural Resources Assessment - Dedekian
Property (APN 481-060-02S) Parcel at the
Northwest Corner, E. California and S. Willow
Avenues, City of Fresno, Fresno County
Busby, Colin I. Basin Research Associates
FR-02217 2005 National Register of Historic Places
Evaluation of the USDA Horticultural Field
Station on Peach Avenue in Fresno, California
Nettles, Wendy M. and Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

Baloian, Randy
10-005305
FR-02228 2005 New Tower Submission Packet, FCC Form
620 for 5189 East Kings Canyon Road
Archaeological Resources
Technology
Losee, Carolyn
FR-02238 2006 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for Cricket Telecommunications
Facility Candidate FAT-017C
(Chestnut/Belmont), 4765 East Belmont,
Fresno, Fresno County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.

FR-02287 2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network
Construction Project, State of California
SWCA Environmental
Consultants
Arrington, Cindy, Bass,
Bryon, Brown, Joan,
Corey, Chris, and Hunt,
Kevin
Submitter - SWCA
Cultural Resources
Report Database No.
06-507;
Submitter - SWCA
Project No. 10715-
180
FR-02332 2008 Records Search and Site Visit Results for TMobile Omnipoint Communications Facility Candidate SC40140 (Marks Kitchen), 4828
East Belmont Avenue, Fresno, Fresno
County, California, 93727
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.

Page 3 of 5 ends

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
FR-02496 2009 Historic Resource Survey for the Placement of Verizon Cell Tower at 5339 East Butler
Ave, Fresno, Freso County, California
Hatoff, Brian URS Corporation
FR-02504 2003 Historic Property Survey for the HOME
Project for Self Help on South Willow & East
Jensen Avenues in Fresno, California
J & R Environmental
Services
Brady, Jon and Hobbs,
Kelly
10-004677, 10-006224, 10-006225
FR-02620 2008 Records Search and Site Visit Results for TMobile Omnipoint Communications Facility Candidate SC40140 (Mark's Kitchen), 4828
East Belmont Avenue, Fresno, Fresno
County, California 93727
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne
FR-02628 2012 Cultural Resources Analysis for E Ventura Ensite #10768 (211849) 4066 East Ventura
Avenue, Fresno, Fresno County, California
Submitter - EBI Way, Michael A. EBI Consulting
Project #61123743
FR-02653 2014 Cultural Resources Survey Big Fresno Fair / CVU0729 1121 South Chance Avenue,
Fresno, Fresno County, California 93702
Submitter - EBI Ocampo, Gabriel EBI Consulting
Project #61136491
FR-02655 2014 Cultural Resources Survey S Winery / Ensite #17717 (263603) 5080 East Tulare Avenue,
Fresno, Fresno County, California 93727
Submitter - EBI Willers, David EBI Consulting
Project #61140608
FR-02722 2015 Fresno Recycled Water Distribution System Project, Phase I Cultural Resources Study,
Fresno County, California
Anderson, Katherine and ESA Cultural Resources
Vader, Michael
IC Record Search 10-004315
Nbr - 13-429; 14-333;

OHP PRN - EPA
2015 0309 001
FR-02722A 2017 Recycled Water Distribution System,
Southwest Quadrant: Phase I Cultural
Resources Study
Anderson, Katherine and ESA
Vader, Michael
FR-02806 2016 Cultural Resources Inventory for the
Proposed Lennar Tract No. 5449 Residential
Development in the City of Fresno, Fresno
County, California
Tibbet, Josh and Baloian, Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

Mary
FR-02896 2012 Fresno Fulton Corridor Specific Plan and
Downtown Neighborhoods Community Plan
Project
Slawson, Dana N. and Greenwood and Associates
Kay, Michael
OHP PRN - 10-006142, 10-006143, 10-006144
EDA_2017_0925_001

Page 4 of 5 ends

Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
FR-02896A 2015 South Van Ness Industrial District Historic Survey, Fresno, California
Historic Preservation
Project Manager, City of
Fresno and
Hrchitecture+History, San
Francisco In association
with Watson Heritage
Consulting
Hattersley-Drayton,
Karana and Stock Jody
FR-02972 2018 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for AT&T Mobility, LLC
Candidate CL01406_CVU3017 (Fresno
Pacific University), 1890 South Wullow
Avenue, Fresno, Fresno County, California,
CASPR NO 3101A0D73E
Environmental Assessment
Specialists, Inc.

Davis, Shane and Wills,
Carrie D.

OHP PRN -
FCC_2018_0730_003
;
Submitter -
3701A0D73E
FR-02992 2018 Basin Training Center 8 FUDS Project U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OHP PRN - Highland, Steven
COE_2018_0608_00
2

Page 5 of 5 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-003930 CA-FRE-003109H Resource Name - Southern
Pacific Railroad
FR-00238, FR01770, FR-01771,
FR-01772, FR02642, FR-02726,
FR-02769, FR02847, FR-02942,
FR-03037
Structure Historic AH07; HP11 1998 (W.L. Norton, Jones & Stokes);
1999 (S. Hooper, S. Flint, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.);
2002 (Peggy B. Murphy, Three Girls
and a Shovel);
2004 (Bryan Larson, Cindy
Toffelmier, JRP Historical
Consulting);
2009 (Joseph Freeman, Rebecca
Flores, JRP Historical Consulting);
2009 (Joseph Freeman, Rebecca
Flores, JRP Historical Consulting);
2009 (Joseph Freeman, Rebecca
Flores, JRP Historical Consulting);
2010 (Michael Hibma, LSA
Associates);
2013 (Randy Baloian, Applied
Earthworks, Inc.);
2015 (Randy Baloian, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.);
2015 (Randy Baloian, Applied
Earthworks, Inc.);
2016 (J. Tibbet, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.);
2018 (Annie McCausland, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.);
2018 (Jessica Jones, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-004248 OHP PRN - 3771-0010-0000;
Resource Name - California
Products Co.

Building Historic HP02 1978 (Unknown)
P-10-004249 OHP PRN - 3771-0011-0000;
Resource Name - The Giffen
Home
Building Historic HP02 (Unknown)
P-10-004253 OHP PRN - 3771-0015-0000;
Resource Name - Shuttera
Residence
Building Historic HP02 1978 (Unknown)
P-10-004274 OHP PRN - 3771-0035-0000;
Resource Name - Sckitchfield
Residence;
Resource Name - Hughes
Residence
Building Historic HP02 (Unknown)

Page 1 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-004280 Resource Name - San Joaquin
Grocers Wholesale Warehouse;
OHP PRN - 3771-0041-0000
Building Historic HP06 1978 (Unknown)
P-10-004286 OHP PRN - 3771-0047-0000;
Resource Name - Sun Maid
Raisin Plant
Building,
Structure
Historic HP33; HP95 1978 (Unknown)
P-10-004287 OHP PRN - 3771-0048-0000;
Resource Name - Old Barn
Building Historic HP39 (Unknown)
P-10-004299 OHP PRN - 3771-0059-0000;
Resource Name - Mingle
Transportation and Warehouse
Company;
Resource Name - Fresno Brewery
Building Historic HP06 1978 (Unknown);
1983 (Patrick Supple)
P-10-004310 OHP PRN - 3771-0071-0000;
Resource Name - The Robinson
Home
Building Historic HP02 (Unknown)
P-10-004312 OHP PRN - 3771-0073-0000;
Resource Name - The Euless
Home
Building Historic HP02 (Unknown)
P-10-004349 OHP PRN - 3771-0112-0000;
Resource Name - Van Ness
Entrance Gate
Structure Historic HP46 1978 (Unknown) FR-02951
P-10-004675 Resource Name - Burlington
Northern Santa Fe Railway;
Other - CRM TECH 607-2H
Structure Historic HP19; HP37 2000 (Bai "Tom" Tang, CRM TECH); FR-01699, FR-03029 2019 (Robert Azpitarte, ASM
Affiliates, Inc.)
P-10-004677 CA-FRE-003605H Resource Name - Central Canal; OTIS Resource Number -
552642;
OHP Property Number - 145600
Structure Historic HP20 2000 (Bai "Tom" Tang, CRM Tech); FR-01699, FR-02504 2003 (Kelly Hobbs, J&R
Environmental Services);
2004 (Bryan Larson, Cindy
Toffelmier, JRP Historical
Consulting)
P-10-004762 Resource Name - 133 S. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02; HP04 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Frenso, CA 93711)
P-10-004763 Resource Name - 144 S. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02; HP04 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)
P-10-004764 Resource Name - 145 S. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth
Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)

Page 2 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-004765 Resource Name - The Steinwand
Home
Building Historic HP02; HP04; HP33 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)
P-10-004766 Resource Name - 317 S. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02; HP04 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)
P-10-004767 Resource Name - 358 S. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02; HP04 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)
P-10-004768 Resource Name - The John M.

Euless Home;
OHP Property Number - 053536
Building Historic HP02; HP04 1994 (William E. Patnaude, Lew & Patnaude, Inc.)
P-10-004769 Resource Name - 270 N. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02 2001 (w. Nettles, Applied Earth
Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)
P-10-004770 Resource Name - 284 N. Peach
Avenue
Building Historic HP02; HP04 2001 (W. Nettles, Applied Earth Works, Inc. 5090 N. Fruit Ave. #101
Fresno, CA 93711)
P-10-005120 Resource Name - Martin Dedkian
Residence;
Resource Name - Mardiros S.

Asadoorian Residence
Building Historic HP02 1992 (Linda Dick Bissonnette,
Cultural Resources Consulting)
P-10-005121 Resource Name - Kings CanyonPeach Site; Mosesian & Sons; San Joaquin Winery;
Resource Name - Fresno
Vineyard Company; Fresno
Winery; Easterby Rancho; Banner
Farm
Building Historic HP08 1992 (Linda Dick Bissonnette,
Cultural Resources Consulting)
P-10-005225 Resource Name - The Lindstrom
Residence;
Resource Name - The Olivas
Residence;
OHP Property Number - 125797
Building Historic HP02 1997 (Dolores Mellon, City of
Fresno)

Page 3 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-005305 Resource Name - USDA
Horticultural Field Station;
OHP Property Number - 165364;
OHP Property Number - 165365;
OHP Property Number - 165366;
OHP Property Number - 165367;
OHP Property Number - 165368;
OTIS Resource Number -
532962;
OTIS Resource Number -
532963;
OTIS Resource Number -
532964;
OTIS Resource Number -
532965;
OTIS Resource Number - 532966
Building, FR-02000, FR-02217
District
Historic HP04; HP14; HP30;
HP33; HP35
2003;
2005 (W. Nettles, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005306 Resource Name - 4808 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - All of Lot 9 and
the East 20 feet of Lot 10 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract, City
of Fresno;
OHP Property Number - 145661
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005307 Resource Name - 4814 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 8 in Block 2
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145662
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005308 Resource Name - 4818 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 7 in Block 2
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145663
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005309 Resource Name - 4826 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 5 in Block 2
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145664
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005310 Resource Name - 4830 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 4 in Block 2
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145665
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)

Page 4 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-005311 Resource Name - 4836 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 3 in Block 2
of Mitchell Simpson Tract, City of
Fresno;
OHP Property Number - 145666
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005312 Resource Name - 4844 E. Balch
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 1 in Block 2
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145667
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005313 Resource Name - 4845 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 20 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145668
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005314 Resource Name - 4841 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 19 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145669
Building Historic HP02; HP04 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005315 Resource Name - 4835 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 18 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145670
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005316 Resource Name - 4831 E. inyo
Avenue;
OHP Property Number - 145671
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005317 Resource Name - 4827 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 16 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract, in the
City of Fresno;
OHP Property Number - 145672
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005318 Resource Name - 4821 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 15 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145673
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)

Page 5 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-005319 Resource Name - 4817 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 14 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson;
OHP Property Number - 145674
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005320 Resource Name - 4813 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 13 in Block
2 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145675
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005321 Resource Name - 4808 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 9 and the
East 20 feet of Lot 10 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 081243
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005322 Resource Name - 4812 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 8 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145676
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005323 Resource Name - 4816 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 7 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145677
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005324 Resource Name - 4822 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 6 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145678
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005325 Resource Name - 4826 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 5 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145679
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005326 Resource Name - 4830 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 4 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145680
Building Protohistoric, FR-01979
Historic
HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied
EarthWorks, Inc.)

Page 6 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-005327 Resource Name - 4834 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 3 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145681
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005328 Resource Name - 4840 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 2 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145682
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005329 Resource Name - 4844 E. Inyo
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 1 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145683
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005330 Resource Name - 4845 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 20 in Block
3 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145684
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005331 Resource Name - 4841 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 19 in Block
3 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145712
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005332 Resource Name - 4835 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 18 in Block
3 in Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145713
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005333 Resource Name - 4831 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - The East 1/2 of
Lot 16 and all of Lot 17 in Block 3
of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145714
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005334 Resource Name - 4817 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - The West 7
feet of Lot 15 and all of Lot 14 in
Block 3 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145715
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)

Page 7 of 8 ends

Primary No. Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs Type Age Attribute codes Recorded by Reports
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
P-10-005335 Resource Name - 4815 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 13 in Block
3 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145716
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-005336 Resource Name - 4809 E. Mono
Avenue;
Resource Name - Lot 12 in Block
3 of Mitchell Simpson Tract;
OHP Property Number - 081244
Building Historic HP02 2003 (David Livingstone, Applied FR-01979 EarthWorks, Inc.)
P-10-006224 Resource Name - Berberian
Residence;
Resource Name - Map Reference
No.1;
Resource Name - Portion of Lot
24 of the Newhall Tract;
OHP Property Number - 145597;
OTIS Resource Number - 552639
Building Historic HP02 2003 (Kelly Hobbs, J & R FR-02504 Environmental Services)
P-10-006225 Resource Name - Map Reference
No.2;
Resource Name - Garza
Residence;
OHP Property Number - 145598;
OTIS Resource Number - 552640
Building Historic HP02 2003 (Kelly Hobbs, J & R FR-02504 Environmental Services)
P-10-006594 Resource Name - S-31 Building Historic HP02 1992 (Ronald Reiss, Ana Koval, FR-02284 Architectural Resources Group)
P-10-006595 Resource Name - S-32 Building Historic HP02 1992 (Gordon White, Ana Korval, FR-02284 Architectural Resources Group)
P-10-006596 Resource Name - S-33 Building Historic HP02 1992 (Gordon White, Ana Koval, FR-02284 Architectural Resources Group)
P-10-006599 Resource Name - S-68 Building Historic HP02 1992 (Ronald Reiss, Ana Koval, FR-02284 Architectural Resources Group)
P-10-006600 Resource Name - S-69 Building Historic HP03 1992 (Gordon White, Ana Koval, FR-02284 Architectural Resources Group)
P-10-006601 Resource Name - S-70 Building Historic HP02 1992 (Ronald Reiss, Ana Koval, FR-02284 Architectural Resources Group)
P-10-007094 CA-FRE-003856H Resource Name - APN 478-162- 01 Historical Deposit
Site Historic AH04 2018 (P. Zimmer, ESA -
Environmental Science Associates)

Page 8 of 8 ends

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Fresno–Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
A.3 - Native American Heritage Commission Request, Response, and Letters

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request
Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 – Fax
[email protected]
Type of List Requested
☐ CEQA Tribal Consultation List (AB 52) – Per Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subs. (b), (d), (e) and 21080.3.2 ☐ General Plan (SB 18) - Per Government Code § 65352.3.

Local Action Type:
___ General Plan ___ General Plan Element ___ General Plan Amendment ___ Specific Plan ___ Specific Plan Amendment ___ Pre-planning Outreach Activity Required Information
Project Title:____________________________________________________________________________ Local Government/Lead Agency: ___________________________________________________________ Contact Person: __________________________________________________________________________ Street Address: ___________________________________________________________________________ City:_____________________________________________________ Zip:__________________________ Phone:____________________________________ Fax:_________________________________________ Email:_____________________________________________
Specific Area Subject to Proposed Action
County:________________________________ City/Community: ___________________________ Project Description:

Additional Request
☐ Sacred Lands File Search - Required Information:

USGS Quadrangle Name(s):____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Township:___________________ Range:___________________ Section(s):___________________ 50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

ADDENDUM
Record Search Map 1
Source: USGS Clovis, Malaga, & Fresno South 7.5' Quadrangles / Land Grants: T13S R20E Sec: 36; T13S R21E Sec: 31; T14S R20E Sections: 1, 2, 11, 13, 14, 23, 24; T14S R21E Sections: 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19. 2,000 1,000 0 2,000
Feet
Project Area
Half-Mile Radius
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map2.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 2 ends

November 14, 2021
Dr. Dana DePietro
FirstCarbon Solutions
Via Email to: [email protected] & [email protected] Re: Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3, Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Project, Fresno County Dear Dr. DePietro:

Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above-listed project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) (“Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.”) Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides:

Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe’s areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources.

The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as:

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

Page 2 of 2 ends

• A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;
• Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and
• If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:
• Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10.

3. The result of any Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was negative.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment
Big Sandy Rancheria of
Western Mono Indians
Elizabeth Kipp, Chairperson
P.O. Box 337
Auberry, CA, 93602
Phone: (559) 374 - 0066
Fax: (559) 374-0055
[email protected]
Western Mono
Cold Springs Rancheria of
Mono Indians
Carol Bill, Chairperson
P.O. Box 209
Tollhouse, CA, 93667
Phone: (559) 855 - 5043
Fax: (559) 855-4445
[email protected]
Mono
Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal
Government
Robert Ledger, Chairperson
2191 West Pico Ave.

Fresno, CA, 93705
Phone: (559) 540 - 6346
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Mono
Kings River Choinumni Farm
Tribe
Stan Alec,
3515 East Fedora Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93726
Phone: (559) 647 - 3227
Foothill Yokut
North Fork Rancheria of Mono
Indians
Elaine Fink, Chairperson
P.O .Box 929
North Fork, CA, 93643
Phone: (559) 877 - 2461
Fax: (559) 877-2467
[email protected]
Mono
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Katherine Perez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Phone: (209) 887 - 3415
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Timothy Perez,
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Phone: (209) 662 - 2788
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
Picayune Rancheria of
Chukchansi Indians
Claudia Gonzales, Chairwoman
P.O. Box 2226
Oakhurst, CA, 93644
Phone: (599) 412 - 5590
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Table Mountain Rancheria
Brenda Lavell, Chairperson
P.O. Box 410
Friant, CA, 93626
Phone: (559) 822 - 2587
Fax: (559) 822-2693
[email protected]
Yokut
Traditional Choinumni Tribe
David Alvarez, Chairperson
2415 E. Houston Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93720
Phone: (559) 217 - 0396
Fax: (559) 292-5057
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Tule River Indian Tribe
Neil Peyron, Chairperson
P.O. Box 589
Porterville, CA, 93258
Phone: (559) 781 - 4271
Fax: (559) 781-4610
[email protected]
Yokut
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom
Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179 Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA, 93906
Phone: (831) 443 - 9702
[email protected]
Foothill Yokut
Mono
1 of 1
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Project, Fresno County.

PROJ-2021-
005593
11/14/2021 05:53 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Tribal Consultation List
Fresno County
11/14/2021

UNITED STATES
T +1 888 826 5814
T +1 714 508 4100
F +1 714 508 4110
E [email protected]
Irvine
250 Commerce
Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92602
Bay Area
1350 Treat Boulevard
Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Central Valley
7726 N. First Street
#413
Fresno, CA 93720
Inland Empire
967 Kendall Drive
#A-537
San Bernardino, CA 92407
Sacramento Valley
2351 Sunset Boulevard
Suite 170-301
Rocklin, CA 95765
Utah
2901 Bluegrass Boulevard
Suite 200-62
Lehi, UT 84043
Connecticut
2 Corporate Drive
Suite 450
Shelton, CT 06484
New York
10 Monument Street
Deposit, NY 13754
56 Broome Corporate Parkway
Conklin, NY 13748
CANADA

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Traditional Choinumni Tribe
David Alvarez, Chairperson
2415 E. Houston Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93720
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Alvarez:

FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS) is preparing a Cultural Resources analysis for the proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan project on behalf of the City of Fresno. As part of the environmental review process, we are searching for records pertaining to cultural resources in the area surrounding the project site described below. Attached is a Records Search map with a 0.5-mile buffer around the site for your reference.

The Central Southeast Specific Plan will focus on low income neighborhoods. This area consists of approximately 2,200 acres. Residential, commercial, and office development in the community has been hampered by the City’s emphasis on new growth in the metropolitan area, by incomplete public facilities, and by negative community perceptions.

The purpose of the plan is to clearly identify and address those issues and concerns adversely affecting the community’s growth and vitality, to anticipate the need for and impacts of new public facilities, and to stimulate the development of well-balanced neighborhoods.

As part of the cultural resources assessment, FCS conducted a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search and California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS). The results of the SLF records search was negative. We are still waiting on results from the CHRIS search. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) suggested you might be able to provide further information. If you have any additional information regarding potential historic or cultural resources in proximity or relation to the proposed project area, we would greatly appreciate your input.

Please note that this letter is a request for information pertaining to a cultural resources assessment and is not notification of a project under Senate Bill (SB) 18, Assembly Bill (AB) 52 or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Please feel free to contact me at 530.219.1432 or via email at [email protected] and thank you for your valuable assistance.
2 Request Letter
Sincerely,
Dana Douglas DePietro, PhD
Director of Cultural Resources
FirstCarbon Solutions
1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Enc: Attachment A: Records Search Maps
Attachment A:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians
Carol Bill, Chairperson
P.O. Box 209
Tollhouse, CA, 93667
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Bill:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Elaine Fink, Chairperson
P.O .Box 929
North Fork, CA, 93643
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Fink:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians
Claudia Gonzales, Chairwoman
P.O. Box 2226
Oakhurst, CA, 93644
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairwoman Gonzales:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians
Elizabeth Kipp, Chairperson
P.O. Box 337
Auberry, CA, 93602
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Kipp:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Table Mountain Rancheria
Brenda Lavell, Chairperson
P.O. Box 410
Friant, CA, 93626
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairwoman Lavell:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal Government
Robert Ledger, Chairperson
2191 West Pico Ave.

Fresno, CA, 93705
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Ledger:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Katherine Perez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Perez:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Tule River Indian Tribe
Neil Peyron, Chairperson
P.O. Box 589
Porterville, CA, 93258
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Peyron:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Kings River Choinumni Farm Tribe
Stan Alec
3515 East Fedora Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93726
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Stan Alec:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Timothy Perez
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Timothy Perez:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UNITED KINGDOM

PORTUGAL
FRANCE
KENYA

AUSTRALIA

PHILIPPINES
CHINA

MALAYSIA

SINGAPORE
1 Request Letter
November 15, 2021
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179 Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA, 93906
Subject: Proposed Central Southeast Specific Plan Project Dear Chairperson Woodrow:

Records Search Map
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

ADDENDUM
Record Search Map 2
Source: USGS Clovis, Malaga, & Fresno South 7.5' Quadrangles / Land Grants: T13S R20E Sec: 36; T13S R21E Sec: 31; T14S R20E Sections: 1, 2, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 23, 24; T14S R21E Sections: 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19. 2,000 1,000 0 2,000
Feet
Project Area
Half-Mile Radius
City of Fresno–Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Transportation Supporting Information

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Fresno–Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
B.1 - Final Traffic Study Memorandum

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Memo
To: Drew Wilson From: Derek Rapp, TE
Dennis Lammers, PTP
City of Fresno Santa Barbara Office
File: 2064158700 Date: February 15, 2022
Reference: Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study The following Final Traffic Study provides an overview of potential traffic impacts generated by the Central Southeast Area Specific Plan (CSESP) Land Use Plan. The study compares the growth projections developed by Raimi + Associates (December 19, 2019) for the Specific Plan Area to land use assumptions applied in the City of Fresno General Plan Recirculated Public Review Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (March 2021) and evaluates the traffic volume changes for each Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) in the Specific Plan Area under General Plan (2035) conditions. A Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis is provided in a separate document. Comments provided by City staff on the Draft Traffic Study (August 23, 2021) are also incorporated in this Final Traffic Study.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Central Southeast Area Specific Plan (CSESP) encompasses approximately 14 city blocks in the southeast portion of the City of Fresno. The Specific Plan is bordered by Belmont Avenue to the north, East Avenue to the west, Church Avenue to the south, and Peach Avenue to the east.

The Plan Area is served by a network of arterials, collectors and local streets. Based on information contained in the General Plan PEIR Appendix J – Traffic Impact Analysis (March 2021), the existing 2035 AM and PM peak hour roadway analysis includes 282 roadways located throughout the City of Fresno, of which 18 roadway segments are located in or directly adjacent to the Specific Plan Area. These 18 roadway segments would potentially be affected by peak hour volume changes resulting from the CSESP Land Use Plan and are evaluated in this traffic and circulation study. These segments are listed in Table 1 along with the existing level of service (LOS) designation. A table showing the AM and PM peak hour volumes is attached for reference.

The City has four Traffic Impact Zones (TIZ I through IV) with different LOS thresholds. In addition, TIZ U denotes unincorporated Fresno County. The Specific Plan roadway segments are located in all five zones, for which the peak hour LOS standards are LOS D through F. As shown in Table 1, all roadway segments included in this analysis currently operate at acceptable service levels based on the level of service data contained in the General Plan PEIR and the City’s TIZ LOS standards.

February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 2 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

Table 1
Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Roadway Levels of Service
# Roadway Segment

TIZ/LOS
Standard Classification
LOS
No. of
Lanes
AM
Peak Hour
PM
Peak Hour
83 Cedar Ave

Church Ave and Jensen Ave II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
84 California Ave and Church Ave U/LOS D Arterial 4 A A 85 Belmont Ave and Tulare St I/LOS F Arterial 4 B C
92 Maple Ave Church Ave and Jensen Ave III/LOS D Collector 4 A A 93 Chestnut Ave
Church Ave and Jensen Ave III/LOS D Arterial 4 A A
94 Tulare St and Kings Cyn Rd II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
95 Belmont Ave to Tulare St II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
108 Peach Ave Kings Cyn Rd to Butler St II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A 109 Belmont Ave to Tulare St II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
234 Belmont Ave First St to Cedar Ave I/LOS F Arterial 4 A A 235 Willow Ave to Peach Ave U/LOS D Arterial 4 A A
251 Kings Cyn Rd Maple Ave to Chestnut Ave II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A 252 Chestnut Ave to Willow Ave II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
257 Butler Ave Hazelwood Blvd to Orange Ave I/LOS F Collector 2 A A 261
Church Ave
Orange Ave to Cedar Ave U/LOS D Collector 4 A A
262 Cedar Ave to Maple Ave III/LOS D Collector 3 A A
267 Jensen Ave
Cedar Ave to Maple Ave IV/LOS E Expressway 4 A A
268 Maple Ave to Chestnut Ave IV/LOS E Expressway 4 A A .

GENERAL PLAN (2035) CONDITIONS
General Plan 2035 traffic volumes contained in the PEIR were developed using the Fresno COG travel demand model (ABM) and are based on socioeconomic data (SED) for the year 2035 as included in the 2050 Fresno County Growth Projections report prepared by Fresno COG. Detailed technical information regarding the development of 2035 volumes is presented in the General Plan PEIR Appendix J – Traffic Impact Analysis and its technical appendices.

February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 3 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

The General Plan (2035) conditions analysis includes implementation of the Circulation Element configuration of the roadway network to reflect the City’s Mobility goals. Based on the General Plan Circulation Element, the following modifications are proposed to be implemented to the roadway segments in the CSESP Plan Area:
 Jensen Avenue will be widened to a six-lane Super Arterial between Orange Avenue and Highland Avenue.
 Church Avenue will be widened to a four-lane Collector from Cedar Avenue to Maple Avenue.  Belmont Avenue will be converted from a four-lane Arterial to a two-lane Collector from First Street to Cedar Street.

Table 2 summarizes the General Plan 2035 roadway segment peak hour volumes and levels of service for the 18 roadway segments the CSESP Plan Area. A table showing the 2035 AM and PM peak hour volumes is attached for reference. Table 2 indicates that the roadway segments included in this study are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels under General Plan 2035 conditions based on the City’s TIZ LOS standards.

Table 2
2035 AM and PM Peak Hour Roadway Levels of Service
General Plan with Circulation Element Roadway Network

# Roadway Segment

TIZ/LOS
Standard Classification
LOS
No. of
Lanes
AM
Peak Hour
PM
Peak Hour
83 Cedar Ave

Church Ave and Jensen Ave II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
84 California Ave and Church Ave U/LOS D Arterial 4 A A 85 Belmont Ave and Tulare St I/LOS F Arterial 4 C C
92 Maple Ave Church Ave and Jensen Ave III/LOS D Collector 4 A A 93 Chestnut Ave
Church Ave and Jensen Ave III/LOS D Arterial 4 A A
94 Tulare St and Kings Cyn Rd II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
95 Belmont Ave to Tulare St II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
108 Peach Ave Kings Cyn Rd to Butler St II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A 109 Belmont Ave to Tulare St II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
234 Belmont Ave First St to Cedar Ave I/LOS F Collector 2 B F 235 Willow Ave to Peach Ave U/LOS D Arterial 4 A A
251 Kings Cyn Rd Maple Ave to Chestnut Ave II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A 252 Chestnut Ave to Willow Ave II/LOS E Arterial 4 A A
February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 4 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

257 Butler Ave Hazelwood Blvd to Orange Ave I/LOS F Collector 2 B B 261 Church Ave Orange Ave to Cedar Ave U/LOS D Collector 4 A A 262 Cedar Ave to Maple Ave III/LOS D Collector 3 A A
267 Jensen Ave
Cedar Ave to Maple Ave IV/LOS E Super Arterial 6 A A
268 Maple Ave to Chestnut Ave IV/LOS E Super Arterial 6 A A CSESP 2035 CONDITIONS
CSESP Land Use Assumptions
To determine the traffic volume changes within the Specific Plan resulting from the CSESP Land Use Plan and assumptions, a comparison is provided between the land use assumptions used in the 2014 City of Fresno General Plan and Development Code Update Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) with the currently proposed CSESP Land Use Plan. The 2021 General Plan PEIR does not provide specific information regarding housing unit and/or non-residential square foot increases per TAZ for the Year 2035. The socioeconomic data used in the Fresno COG traffic model for the PEIR is derived from housing unit and employment (job) increase projections contained in the previous 2014 General Plan MEIR. Thus, the residential and non-residential data for the Specific Plan contained in the 2014 MEIR are consistent with the data used for the 2021 PEIR.

The CSESP Land Use Plan is based on the growth projections and capacity analysis completed by Raimi + Associates for the Specific Plan Area with a 2035 horizon. The growth projections assume the maximum amount of residential and non-residential development that could occur on each vacant or underutilized parcels. A growth adjustment scenario was provided that assumes 60 percent of the maximum residential growth and 40 percent of the maximum non-residential growth could occur by the 2035 horizon. To provide a traffic comparison that is consistent with the 2021 PEIR, the analysis applies the reasonable growth projection that could occur by 2035.

The General Plan land use growth data in the 2014 MEIR is provided in housing units and employment (jobs).

Jobs were converted into non-residential square feet (SF) in order to develop trip generation estimates, because trip generation rates per SF are more stable than rates per employee (jobs) and are the industry standard. To generate trip estimates for the non-residential land uses included in the MEIR, Stantec converted the job increase per TAZ to square footage based on land use assumptions (Office, Retail, Light Industrial etc.) and the relationship between ITE rate for employees and ITE rate for KSF for each land use.

For example, ITE Land Use #710 - General Office Building has a trip generation rate of 9.74 Average Daily Trips (ADT) per KSF and a rate of 3.28 ADT per employee. Based on this relationship, there are 3 employees per 1,000 SF (9.74 / 3.28). Thus, if the 2014 MEIR projected a growth of 12 jobs under the land use Office, the resulting building square footage would be 4,000 SF.

February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 5 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

Table 3 provides an overview of the proposed land use changes per Specific Plan TAZ. As shown, the proposed CSESP Land Use Plan would result in residential and non-residential development slightly below the growth projected in the General Plan buildout (278 fewer housing units and 128,858 fewer square feet (SF) of nonresidential building space).

Table 3
2035 General Plan and CSESP Land Use Growth Comparison
TAZ
GP
Housing
Units
CSESP
Housing
Units
Change
in
Housing
Units
GP NonResidential SFCSESP NonResidential SFChange in NonResidential SF 1430 2 5 3 4,000 0 -4,000
1431 203 389 186 41,524 23,717 -17,807
1433 282 79 -203 96,595 7,145 -89,540
1445 31 37 6 28,261 3,460 -24,801
1447 13 55 42 0 3,390 3,390
1448 12 0 -12 8,581 0 -8,581
1449 119 281 162 37,453 24,652 -12,081
1450 101 295 194 12,878 17,459 4,581
1451 0 117 117 0 0 0
1452 228 526 298 54,255 36,050 -18,205
1453 293 54 -239 98,439 725 -97,714
1454 86 127 41 0 9,405 9,405
1455 3 3 0 0 0 0
1469 836 0 -836 0 30,334 30,334
1472 0 0 0 22,085 69,333 47,248
1474 0 82 82 285,276 323,860 38,584
1476 196 289 93 0 10,589 10,589
1478 372 160 -212 3,630 0 -3,630
1535 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 2,777 2,499 -278 692,977 560,119 -128,858
Trip Generation Estimates
Trip generation estimates were developed for each TAZ in the Specific Plan Area based on the anticipated housing unit and non-residential square-footage growth, and trip generation rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) for each projected land use.

Detailed trip generation worksheets are attached for reference. The trip generation estimates per TAZ are summarized in Table 4.

February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 6 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

Table 4
2035 General Plan and CSESP Trip Generation Estimates Comparison TAZ
General Plan PEIR CSESP Change

ADT AM PHT PM PHT ADT
AM

PHT PM PHT ADT AM PHT PM PHT
1430 58 6 7 47 4 5 -11 -2 -2
1431 3,250 191 451 3,908 247 443 658 56 -8
1433 5,450 254 688 800 43 108 -4650 -211 -580
1445 968 44 174 378 20 58 -590 -24 -116
1447 95 6 8 505 28 68 410 22 60
1448 488 38 26 0 0 0 -488 -38 -26
1449 2,060 123 283 2,815 147 194 755 24 -89
1450 1,253 73 181 2,555 194 195 1302 121 14
1451 0 0 0 1,104 87 116 1104 87 116
1452 3,437 175 427 5,180 306 556 1743 131 129
1453 5,487 230 661 465 32 53 -5022 -198 -608
1454 812 64 85 1,221 68 150 409 4 65
1455 28 3 3 28 3 3 0 0 0
1469 6,120 384 468 332 49 31 -5788 -335 -437
1472 110 15 14 1,199 149 82 1089 134 68
1474 1,415 200 180 3,720 215 221 2305 15 41
1476 1,850 154 194 2,573 196 223 723 42 29
1478 3,594 287 374 1,290 89 114 -2304 -198 -260
1535 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 36,474 2,249 4,234 27,591 1,877 2,620 -8,883 -372 -1614 Pass-By
Trips1 -1,098 -29 -643 -308 -8 -209 (-)781 (-)21 (-)434 TOTAL 35,376 2,220 3,591 27,283 1,869 2,411 -8,102 -351 -1,180 ADT = average daily trips.

PHT = peak hour trips.
1 A pass-by rate of 34% (ITE Trip Generation Manual) is applied to commercial land uses to account for vehicles already on the adjacent roadway system that visit the site.

The trip generation data contained in Table 4 indicates that compared to the General Plan, the proposed CSESP land use changes would result in an overall reduction of traffic in the Specific Plan area of 8,102 average daily trips (ADT), a reduction of 351 AM peak hour trips and a reduction of 1,180 PM peak hour trips compared to GP 2035 conditions. Significant peak hour trip reductions are expected in four TAZ’s (1433, 1453, 1469 and February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 7 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

1478), while any potential trip increase per TAZ is moderate with a maximum of 134 peak hour trips in TAZ 1472.

Roadway Segment Impact Assessment
The roadway segment analysis contained in the PEIR focusses on 282 roadways located throughout the City of Fresno, of which 18 roadway segments are located in or directly adjacent to the Specific Plan Area. The existing conditions analysis indicates that the 18 roadway segments that could be affected by Specific Plan land use changes currently operate at acceptable service levels based on the City’s TIZ LOS standards. The PEIR also indicates that all 18 roadway segments are forecast to operate at acceptable service levels under General Plan 2035 with Circulation Element conditions based on the City’s TIZ LOS standards.

The Specific Plan area trip generation estimates outlined in this study found that the CSESP Land Use Plan would result in an overall reduction of traffic in the Specific Plan area of 8,102 ADT, a reduction of 351 AM peak hour trips and a reduction of 1,180 PM peak hour trips compared to GP 2035 conditions. With respect to roadway segment operations, the following finding are made:
 4 TAZ’s could expect significant peak hour trip reductions (more than 260 PHT), which would result in increased levels of service on the roadway segments directly adjacent to each TAZ.

 10 TAZ’S could expect slight peak hour trip reductions or increase (-89 PHT to 65 PHT), which would not result in noticeable traffic volume change once distributed onto the study-area roadway network.  4 TAZ’s could expect moderate peak hour trip increases (more than 100 PHT to 150 PHT), which would result in slight increases in traffic volume on the roadway segments directly adjacent to each TAZ.

These slight increases would not have the potential to change the 2035 roadway segment level of service levels contained in the PEIR.

Table 2 indicated that 17 of the 18 roadway segments included in this study are expected to operate at LOS AC under 2035 GP with Circulation Element conditions, well within each roadway’s minimum level of service standard. One segment – Belmont Avenue between First Street and Cedar Avenue - will be reduced from 4 lanes to 2 lanes and is expected to operate in the LOS F range per the General Plan PEIR (see Table 2). Given that Belmont Ave is on the northern boundary of the Specific Plan area and the nearest TAZ (1430) would see a reduction in trips assuming the CSESP Land Use Plan, no changes to the roadway segment’s level of service would occur.

Conclusions
The level of service data and trip generation data provided in this study indicates that the CSESP Land Use Plan would not result in any changes to the roadway segment peak hour levels of service contained in City of Fresno General Plan Recirculated Public Review Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (March 2021).

February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 8 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

Appendix A
February 15, 2022
Drew Wilson

Page 9 of 9 ends

Reference: Central Southeast Area Specific Plan – Final Traffic Study

Land Use GP GP GP
TAZ Map # Housing Units   Rate In Out Rate In Out Jobs SF Conversion ITE 10th Edition rates applied to GP
employees Rate In Out Rate In Out
1430 6 2 0.74 0 1 0.99 1 1 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 4,000 12 12/3 = 4,000 Office: 3.0 employees/KSF 1.16 4 1 1.15 1 4 office/limited retail
1431 - 203 0.74 38 113 0.99 127 74 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 41,524 103 25/3 = 8,333      78/2.35
= 33,191
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF  Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 8 2 1.15 2 8
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 19 12 FC 115 125
1433 - 141 0.46 15 50 0.56 50 29 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 96,595 240 60/3 = 20,000 180/2.35
= 76,595
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 20 3 1.15 4 19
141 0.74 26 78 0.99 88 52 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 45 27 FC 214 232
1445 1 31 0.46 3 11 0.56 11 6 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 28,261 74 35/3 = 11,666 39/2.35
= 16,595
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 12 2 1.15 2 11
commercial & office 0.94 10 6 FC 69 75
1447 1 13 0.46 1 5 0.56 5 3 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 0 0 -
1448 - 12 0.74 2 7 0.99 7 4 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 8,581 26 26/3.03 = 8,581 Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF 3.34 21 8 1.71 4 11 public & institutional
1449 2 & 3 89 0.46 9 32 0.56 31 18 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 37,453 98 30/3.03 = 9,900         15/3
= 5,000            53/2.35 =
22,553
Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF  Office:

3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

3.34 25 8 1.71 4 13
30 0.74 6 17 0.99 19 11 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing public & institutional
community commercial

1.16 5 1 1.15 1 5

0.94 13 8 FC 86 94
1450 4 51 0.46 5 18 0.56 18 11 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 12,878 32 8/3 = 2,666
24/2.35 = 10,212
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 3 0 1.15 0 3
50 0.74 9 28 0.99 31 18 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing community commercial 0.94 6 4 FC 48 52 1451 - 0 0 0
-
1452 - 228 0.46 24 81 0.56 80 47 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 54,255 134 30/3 = 10,000
104/2.35 = 44,255
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 10 2 1.15 2 10
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 42 16 FC 142 155
1453 7 293 0.46 31 104 0.56 103 61 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 98,439 240 40/3 = 13,333
200/2.35 = 85,106
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 13 2 1.15 2 13
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 50 30 FC 231 251
1454 5 86 0.74 16 48 0.99 54 32 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 0 0 -
1455 - 3 0.74 1 2 0.99 2 1 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 0 0 -
1469 - 836 0.46 88 296 0.56 295 173 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 0 0 -
1472 11 0 22,085 36 36/1.63 = 22,085 Light Industrial: 1.63 employees/KSF 0.7 13 2 0.63 2 12 Light industrial
1474 10 & 11 0 285,276 465 465/1.63 = 285,276 Light Industrial: 1.63 employees/KSF 0.7 176 24 0.63 23 157 light industrial
1476 9 196 0.74 36 109 0.99 122 72 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 0 0 1478 8 372 0.74 69 206 0.99 232 136 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 3,630 11 11/3.03 = 3,630 Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF 3.34 9 3 1.71 1 5 civic uses
1535 - 0 0 0
0 -
TOTAL 2,777 381 1,203 1,276 750 692,977 1,471 504 161 953 1,255 Retail Pass-By Rate: 10% AM PHT and 34% PM PHT 19 10 308 335 2035 GP - RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION 2035 GP - NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION TAZ
GP Non-Residential
SF
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trip Generation Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use CSESP
CSESP
TAZ Map # Housing Units Rate In Out Rate In Out Jobs Zoning ITE 10th Edition rates applied to
CSESP employees Rate In Out Rate In Out
1430 6 5 0.74 1 3 0.99 3 2 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 0 0 -
1431 - 233 0.46 25 83 0.56 82 48 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 23,717 54

5.930x3 = 12

17.787x2.35 = 42
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 6 1 1.15 1 6
156 0.74 29 87 0.99 97 57 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 10 7 FC 72 79
1433 - 79 0.46 8 28 0.56 28 16 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 7,145 18

1.786x3 = 5

5.359x2.35 = 13
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 2 0 1.15 0 2
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 3 2 FC 30 32
1445 1 37 0.46 4 13 0.56 13 8 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 3,460 9

0.865x3 = 3

2.595x2.35 = 6
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 1 0 1.15 0 1
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 1 1 FC 17 19
1447 1 55 0.46 6 19 0.56 19 11 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 3,390 9

0.848/3 = 3

2.542/2.35 = 6
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 1 0 1.15 0 1
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 1 1 FC 17 19
1448 - 0 0 0
-
1449 2 & 3 281 0.46 30 100 0.56 99 58 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 24,652 62

6.136x3 = 18

18.516/2.35 = 44
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 1 0 1.15 0 1
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail) community
commercial

0.94 10 7 FC 17 19
1450 4 295 0.46 31 104 0.56 104 61 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 17,459 53 17.46x.3.03 = 53 Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF 3.34 43 15 1.71 7 23 Urban Neighborhood
1451 - 117 0.74 22 65 0.99 73 43 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 0 0 -
1452 - 421 0.46 45 149 0.56 149 87 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 36,050 91

9.013x3 = 27

27.037/2.35 = 64
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 9 1 1.15 1 9
105 0.74 19 58 0.99 65 38 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 15 10 FC 99 107
1453 7 34 0.46 4 12 0.56 12 7 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 725 2 0.725/2.35 = 2 Retail: 2.35 employees/KSF 0.94 1 1 FC 7 7 20 0.74 4 11 0.99 12 7 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing retail 1454 5 127 0.46 13 45 0.56 45 26 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 9,405 24

2.351x3 = 7

7.045/2.35 = 17
Office: 3.0 employees/KSF Retail: 2.35
employees/KSF

1.16 3 0 1.15 0 3
center mixed use (mixed
office/retail)

0.94 4 3 FC 36 40
1455 - 3 0.74 1 2 0.99 2 1 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing 0 0 -
1469 - 0 30,334 64

10.334x3.03 = 31 20.000
x 1.63 = 33
Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF 3.34 26 9 1.71 4 14
business park Light Industrial: 1.63 employees/KSF 0.7 12 2 0.63 2 11 1472 11 0 69,333 199

20.000 x 3.03 = 61

40.000x3.08 = 123

9.333x1.63 = 15
Business Park: 3.08 employees/KSF
Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF
Light Industrial: 1.63 employees/KSF

0.4 5 3 0.42 3 5
business park 3.34 100 34 1.71 17 51

0.7 6 1 0.63 1 5
1474 10 & 11 53 0.46 6 19 0.56 19 11 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 323,860 809 193.860 x 3.08 = 597
130.000x1.63 = 212
Business Park: 3.08 employees/KSF 0.4 47 31 0.42 37 44
29 0.74 5 16 0.99 18 11 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing business park Light Industrial: 1.63 employees/KSF 0.7 80 11 0.63 11 71 1476 9 188 0.46 20 67 0.56 66 39 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 10,589 32 10.589x.3.03 = 32 101 0.74 19 56 0.99 63 37 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing Urban Neighborhood Govt Office: 3.03 employees/KSF 3.34 26 9 1.71 4 14 1478 8 104 0.46 11 37 0.56 37 22 #220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 0 0 56 0.74 10 31 0.99 35 21 #210 - Simgle-Family Detached Housing - 1535 - 0 0 0
-
TOTAL 2,499 311 1004 1042 612 560,119 1,426 413 149 383 583 Retail Pass-By Rate: 10% AM PHT and 34% PM PHT 5 3 100 109 2035 CSESP - RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION 2035 CSESP - NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION TAZ
CSESP NonResidential SF
Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trip Generation
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
GP GP
Housing Units
In Out In Out Jobs In Out In Out In Out In Out
1430 2 0 1 1 1 4,000 12 4 1 1 4 4 2 2 5
1431 203 38 113 127 74 41,524 103 8 2 2 8 46 115 129 82 19 12 115 125 19 12 115 125
1433 141 15 50 50 29 96,595 240 20 3 4 19 35 53 54 48
141 26 78 88 52 45 27 214 232 71 105 302 284
1445 31 3 11 11 6 28,261 74 12 2 2 11 15 13 13 17
10 6 69 75 10 6 69 75
1447 13 1 5 5 3 0 0 1 5 5 3
1448 12 2 7 7 4 8,581 26 21 8 4 11 23 15 11 15
1449 89 9 32 31 18 37,453 98 25 8 4 13 34 40 35 31
30 6 17 19 11 5 1 1 5 11 18 20 16
13 8 86 94 13 8 86 94
1450 51 5 18 18 11 12,878 32 3 0 0 3 8 18 18 14
50 9 28 31 18 6 4 48 52 15 32 79 70
1451 0 0 0
1452 228 24 81 80 47 54,255 134 10 2 2 10 34 83 82 57
42 16 142 155 42 16 142 155
1453 293 31 104 103 61 98,439 240 13 2 2 13 44 106 105 74 50 30 231 251 50 30 231 251
1454 86 16 48 54 32 0 0 16 48 54 32
1455 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 2 2 1
1469 836 88 296 295 173 0 0 88 296 295 173
1472 0 22,085 36 13 2 2 12 13 2 2 12
1474 0 285,276 465 176 24 23 157 176 24 23 157
1476 196 36 109 122 72 0 0 36 109 122 72
1478 372 69 206 232 136 3,630 11 9 3 1 5 78 209 233 141 1535 0 0 0
TOTAL 2,777 381 1,203 1,276 750 692,977 1,471 504 161 953 1,255 885 1,364 2,229 2,005 Retail Pass-By Rate: 10% AM PHT and 34% PM PHT 19 10 308 335 NET NEW TRIPS 866 1,354 1,922 1,670
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
2035 GP - TOTAL TRIP GENERATION 2035 GP - RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION 2035 GP - NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION TAZ
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
GP NonResidential SF
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

CSESP CSESP
Housing Units In Out In Out Jobs In Out In Out In Out In Out 1430 5 1 3 3 2 0 0 1 3 3 2
1431 233 25 83 82 48 23,717 54 6 1 1 6 31 84 83 54
156 29 87 97 57 10 7 72 79 39 94 169 136
1433 79 8 28 28 16 7,145 18 2 0 0 2 10 28 28 18
3 2 30 32 3 2 30 32
1445 37 4 13 13 8 3,460 9 1 0 0 1 5 13 13 9
1 1 17 19 1 1 17 19
1447 55 6 19 19 11 3,390 9 1 0 0 1 7 19 19 12
1 1 17 19 1 1 17 19
1448 0 0 0
1449 281 30 100 99 58 24,652 62 1 0 0 1 31 100 99 59
10 7 17 19 10 7 17 19
1450 295 31 104 104 61 17,459 53 43 15 7 23 74 119 111 84 1451 117 22 65 73 43 0 0 22 65 73 43
1452 421 45 149 149 87 36,050 91 9 1 1 9 54 150 150 96
105 19 58 65 38 15 10 99 107 34 68 164 145
1453 34 4 12 12 7 725 2 1 1 7 7 5 13 19 14
20 4 11 12 7 4 11 12 7
1454 127 13 45 45 26 9,405 24 3 0 0 3 16 45 45 29
4 3 36 40 4 3 36 40
1455 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 2 2 1
1469 0 30,334 64 26 9 4 14 26 9 4 14
12 2 2 11 12 2 2 11
1472 0 69,333 199 5 3 3 5 5 3 3 5
100 34 17 51 100 34 17 51
6 1 1 5 6 1 1 5
1474 53 6 19 19 11 323,860 809 47 31 37 44 53 50 56 55
29 5 16 18 11 80 11 11 71 85 27 29 82
1476 188 20 67 66 39 10,589 32 20 67 66 39
101 19 56 63 37 26 9 4 14 45 65 67 51
1478 104 11 37 37 22 0 0 11 37 37 22
56 10 31 35 21 10 31 35 21
1535 0 0 0
TOTAL 2,499 311 1,004 1,042 612 560,119 1,426 413 149 383 583 724 1,153 1,425 1,195 Retail Pass-By Rate: 10% AM PHT and 34% PM PHT 5 3 100 109 NET NEW TRIPS 719 1,150 1,325 1,086
2035 CSESP - TOTAL TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
2035 CSESP - RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION 2035 CSESP - NON-RESIDENTIAL TRIP GENERATION TAZ AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour CSESP NonResidential SF
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Fresno–Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
B.2 - Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, California 92507 951.781.9310 www.lsa.net

MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 16, 2022
TO: Sophia Pagoulatos and Drew Wilson, City of Fresno
FROM: Ambarish Mukherjee, Principal, LSA
SUBJECT: Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan ‐ Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis LSA has prepared this memorandum documenting the methodology and findings of a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for the Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan (CSESP) (project/specific plan) in the City of Fresno (City). Based on our understanding of the project, modifications are currently being proposed for some of the CSESP land uses. As such, these updates within CSESP would require a General Plan Amendment (GPA). Since the project is a specific plan, it qualifies as a land use plan. Therefore, the project’s VMT analysis needs to be prepared using the criteria set forth in the City’s CEQA Guidelines for VMT Thresholds (VMT Guidelines) adopted June 25, 2020 for land use plans. The City’s VMT guidelines require that for land use plans, the project’s VMT per capita and VMT per employee under forecast/cumulative scenario be compared to the corresponding base year VMT per capita/employee to determine whether the project would have a significant VMT impact. Additionally, this memorandum also provides VMT per capita and VMT per employee under the no project cumulative scenario (no changes to the General Plan) for uses within the CSESP area.

Although analysis of this scenario is not required per the City’s guidelines, the findings from this analysis will help develop a narrative regarding whether the proposed project would be beneficial in reducing VMT per capita and VMT per employee under cumulative conditions. The Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) Activity Based Model (ABM) has been used to determine VMT impact of the proposed changes.

INTRODUCTION
On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared the revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines for use. Among the changes to the guidelines was removal of vehicle delay and level of service from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project’s/plan’s effect on VMT.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Fresno CSESP is a long‐term, comprehensive planning document which provides the basis for implementation of the City’s General Plan over the 2,200‐acre Plan Area. The CSESP provides policies relating to land use and urban design, transportation, public spaces, and economic development, as well as a range of specific projects that would address these policies in areas considered deficient in their existing condition. The CSESP Public Draft, completed in April 2021, defines the Plan Area, and shows proposed land use changes as shown in Figure 1. 8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx) Figure 1: CSESP Plan Area and Proposed Land Use Changes 8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx)

METHODOLOGY
These updates within CSESP would require a GPA. Since the project is a specific plan, it qualifies as a land use plan. Therefore, the project’s VMT analysis needs to be prepared using the criteria set forth in the City’s VMT Guidelines, 2020, for land use plans.

The VMT Guidelines also provide multiple screening criteria for land use projects. However, given the project is a specific plan with an amendment and would require a GPA, the screening criteria are not applicable and hence a complete VMT analysis was conducted.

The City’s VMT guidelines require that for land use plans, the project’s VMT per capita and VMT per employee under forecast/cumulative scenario be compared to the corresponding base year VMT per capita/employee to determine whether the project would have a significant VMT impact.

The Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) Activity Based Model (ABM) has been used to determine VMT impact of the proposed changes. Total CSESP area comprises of 19 ABM/model Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) – 1096, 1115, 1117, 1135, 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1153, 1154, 1155, 1156, 1157, 1166, 1167, 1168, 1169 and 1170 as shown in Figure 2.

The current amendment is proposing changes in approximately 14 different areas within the specific plan (identified in Figure 1). The 14 different areas fall within 11 ABM TAZs. The proposed land uses within these 14 areas are shown in Figure 3. The city provided the existing and proposed CSESP land uses for these amended areas/parcels.

PROJECT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES UPDATE
LSA converted the amended parcel land uses into model socioeconomic categories using generic land use to socioeconomic conversion factors. The conversion factors are same as the conversion factors used during the City’s latest General Plan update. Table 1 shows the conversion factors used to convert the CSESP amended land uses into model socioeconomic categories.

Table 1: CSESP Proposed Land Use Conversion Factors
CSESP Proposed Land Use
DUs per
Acre
Employees
per Acre
Business Park 0.0 16.3
Commercial Community 0.0 17.5
Corridor ‐ Center Mixed Use * 9.6 26.2
Residential ‐ Medium Density 8.0 0.0
Residential ‐ Medium High Density 14.0 0.0
Urban Neighborhood 24.0 0.0

DU – Dwelling Units
*: Assumed 75% of area for residential uses and 25% of area for non‐residential uses 8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx) Figure 2: Fresno COG Activity‐Based Model Traffic Analysis Zones 8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx) Figure 3: Proposed CSESP Land Use Changes
8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx) Table 2 shows the resulting dwelling units and total employment for each project TAZ. LSA understands that the conversion was conducted using maximum densities as specific probable densities are unavailable and use of maximum densities would also present with a conservative scenario.

Table 2: CSESP Proposed Dwelling Units and Employment
Existing Fresno COG TAZ
/ Parent TAZ
New TAZ ID for
VMT Analysis
CSESP Amendment Area
DU
CSESP Amendment
Area Employment
1096 2856 48 ‐ 1136 2857 443 ‐ 1138 2858 50 46 1139 2859 75 ‐ 1153 2860 60 54 1154 2860 43 39 1155 2861 143 861 1167 2862 ‐ 837 1168 2863 356 609 1169 2864 142 ‐ 1170 2865 183 ‐ Total 1,544 2,447 DU – Dwelling Units
The Fresno COG ABM includes ability to split zones/add new zones. As indicated before, the 14 different areas with amendments fall within 11 ABM TAZs. To isolate the effect of the amendments, 10 new TAZs were created for the 11 different areas. Amendments in existing TAZs 1153 and 1154 were combined into one new TAZ, given parcels in both areas contain same land use type and are adjacent to one another.

Given that the proposed project is an amendment to the 2035 General Plan, the amended land uses cannot be directly added to the model but the 2035 growth in the Fresno COG model dataset need to be adjusted appropriately before adding the amendments.

Upon conversion of the amendment land uses to socioeconomic data (SED), the General Plan SED from Fresno COG 2035 was adjusted appropriately and SED for the amendment was added into the new model TAZs. Comparison of SED between CSESP amendments and Fresno COG growth (2035 – 2019) was conducted at a TAZ level.

Table 3 illustrates the existing 2019, 2035 ABM, CSESP amendment SEDs, and the corresponding adjusted SED for the parent/original TAZs. The adjusted SED for the parent/original TAZs was arrived by the following methodology:
 For each TAZ, if proposed CSESP SED is higher than the model growth, then entire growth for the TAZ was removed from Fresno COG 2035 model.
8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx)  If model growth is higher than CSESP SED then, the model growth was adjusted to the difference between model growth and CSESP SED (model growth minus CSESP amendment data).

The corresponding SED for the proposed CSESP was added to the new TAZs as a conservative approach. Same methodology was followed for both households and total employment. The resulting 2035 SED for the parent TAZs is illustrated under the “Adjusted 2035 ABM” columns of Table 3. The 2035 SED for the project TAZs is illustrated in previously referenced Table 2.

MODEL RUNS AND PROJECT VMT ESTIMATION
A horizon year (2035) model run was conducted using the adjusted socioeconomic data for the original zones (Table 3) and amended socioeconomic data for the new TAZs (Table 2). No roadway or transit network modifications were conducted for the model run with the CSESP amendments.

The outputs from this updated model run were used to calculate the VMT per capita and VMT per employee for the proposed amendments.

As indicated before, for land use plans, the City’s guidelines recommend use of VMT per capita to evaluate residential land uses and VMT per employee to evaluate non‐residential land uses. Since the project contains both residential and non‐residential uses, LSA estimated VMT per capita for the amended parcel’s residential land uses and VMT per employee for the non‐residential land uses.

VMT metrics for Fresno COG ABM include two components, internal‐internal (II) and internal‐ external/external‐internal (IXXI) VMT. Both II VMT and IX/XI VMT were included in the estimation of overall project VMT per capita and VMT per employee.

PROJECT VMT ANALYSIS
Table 4 shows the VMT metrics for the amended parcels only. As can be seen from Table 4, the proposed amendments/project does not constitute a significant VMT impact.

Table 4: 2035 CSESP Amended Parcels Only and Regional VMT Metrics 2035 CSESP (Project)
City of Fresno
(Threshold) ***
Significant
Impact
VMT per capita * 8.7 14.0 No
VMT per employee ** 20.0 22.3 No
*: VMT per capita estimate includes internal‐internal (II) and internal‐external (IX) VMT **: VMT per employee estimate includes internal‐internal (primary work tour and sub‐tours) and external‐internal (XI) VMT ***: City thresholds are 13% below the existing county averages 8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx) 8 Table 3: Model Socioeconomic data Adjustments for CSESP Amendments 2019 ABM 2035 ABM Growth ABM (2035 ‐ 2019) CSESP Amendment Area Adjusted 2035 ABM ABM
TAZ
Total
Households
Total
Employment
Total
Households
Total
Employment
Total
Households
Total
Employment
Total
Households
Total
Employment
Total
Households
Total
Employment
1096 417 80 418 82 1 2 48 ‐ 417 821115 898 263 931 267 33 5 na na 931 2671117 273 704 391 723 118 19 na na 391 7231135 262 263 280 281 18 18 na na 280 2811136 516 254 520 254 4 (0) 443 ‐ 516 2541137 122 1,201 122 1,201 ‐ (0) na na 122 12011138 884 394 938 394 54 ‐ 50 46 888 3941139 505 1,099 505 1,099 ‐ (0) 75 ‐ 505 10991140 101 4,892 101 4,892 ‐ ‐ na na 101 48921153 437 826 465 825 28 (0) 60 54 437 8261154 549 176 581 176 32 (0) 43 39 549 1761155 655 561 688 575 33 14 143 861 655 5611156 687 63 687 75 ‐ 12 na na 687 751157 623 1,089 638 1,150 15 61 na na 638 11501166 1 216 1 928 ‐ 712 na na 1 9281167 21 387 21 668 ‐ 281 ‐ 837 21 3871168 95 544 95 575 ‐ 31 356 609 95 5441169 486 110 518 110 32 (0) 142 ‐ 486 1101170 436 103 438 103 2 (0) 183 ‐ 436 103 Total 7,968 13,224 8,338 14,377 370 1,153 1,544 2,447 8,156 14,052 8/16/22 (P:\CFO2203_CSESP\Fresno_CSESP_VMT Analysis_Memorandum_08‐16‐2022.docx) VMT metrics for the entire CSESP area were also estimated with and without the proposed amendments to assess their impact to the entire specific plan area. As can be seen from Tables 5 and 6, (both VMT per capita and VMT per employee) for the entire CSESP area with proposed amendments (project) as the CSESP area without proposed amendments (no project) scenarios would not have a significant VMT impact. Additionally, as can be identified from both tables, the project would have a lower VMT per capita and VMT per employee compared to the no project scenario within the entire CSESP plan area.

Table 5: 2035 CSESP Entire Plan Area and Regional VMT Metrics With Proposed Amendments
2035 CSESP (Project)
City of Fresno
(Threshold) ***
Significant
Impact
VMT per capita * 8.7 14.0 No
VMT per employee ** 20.4 22.3 No

*: VMT per capita estimate includes internal‐internal (II) and internal‐external (IX) VMT **: VMT per employee estimate includes internal‐internal (primary work tour and sub‐tours) and external‐internal (XI) VMT ***: City thresholds are 13% below the existing county averages Table 6: 2035 CSESP Entire Plan Area and Regional VMT Metrics Without Proposed Amendments
2035 CSESP (Project)
City of Fresno
(Threshold) ***
Significant
Impact
VMT per capita * 9.2 14.0 No
VMT per employee ** 20.7 22.3 No

ATTACHMENTS
Appendix A – Detailed VMT Calculation Worksheets
Appendix A: Central Southeast Specific Plan (CSESP),
City of Fresno VMT Analysis (Amended Parcels Only)
Detailed VMT per capita calculations
Total households 1,544
Total Population (a) 4,403
Total Internal‐Internal (II) household
VMT  (b) * 26,591
II VMT per capita (c=a/b) 6.04
IX VMT per capita (d) ** 2.28
VMT per capita (e=c+d) 8.32
Adjustment factor (new base)(f) 1.05
Adjusted VMT per capita (g=e*f) 8.74
Detailed VMT per employee calculations
Total employment (a) 2,447
Total Internal‐Internal (II) Work VMT
(b) * 27,922
II VMT per employee (c=a/b) 11.41
XI VMT per employee (d) ** 8.13
VMT per employee (e=c+d) 19.54
Adjustment factor (new base)(f) 1.02
Adjusted VMT per capita (g=e*f) 20.01
P:\CFO2203\comparison_csesp.xlsx
Appendix A: Central Southeast Specific Plan (CSESP), City of Fresno VMT Analysis (Entire CSESP area including CSESP Amendments) Detailed VMT per capita calculations
Total households 10,982
Total Population (a) 33,075
Total Internal‐Internal (II) household
VMT  (b) * 201,778
II VMT per capita (c=a/b) 6.10
IX VMT per capita (d) ** 2.18
VMT per capita (e=c+d) 8.28
Adjustment factor (new base)(f) 1.05
Adjusted VMT per capita (g=e*f) 8.70
Detailed VMT per employee calculations
Total employment (a) 16,498
Total Internal‐Internal (II) Work VMT
(b) * 199,425
II VMT per employee (c=a/b) 12.09
XI VMT per employee (d) ** 7.81
VMT per employee (e=c+d) 19.89
Adjustment factor (new base)(f) 1.02
Adjusted VMT per capita (g=e*f) 20.38
P:\CFO2203\comparison_csesp.xlsx
Appendix A: No project / 2035 Fresno COG ABM,
City of Fresno VMT Analysis (Entire CSESP area)
Detailed VMT per capita calculations
Total households 9,485
Total Population (a) 27,560
Total Internal‐Internal (II) household VMT
(b) * 181,642
II VMT per capita (c=a/b) 6.59
IX VMT per capita (d) ** 2.18
VMT per capita (e=c+d) 8.77
Adjustment factor (new base)(f) 1.05
Adjusted VMT per capita (g=e*f) 9.22
Detailed VMT per employee calculations
Total employment (a) 14,377
Total Internal‐Internal (II) Work VMT  (b) * 177,625
II VMT per employee (c=a/b) 12.35
XI VMT per employee (d) ** 7.81
VMT per employee (e=c+d) 20.16
Adjustment factor (new base)(f) 1.02
Adjusted VMT per capita (g=e*f) 20.65
P:\CFO2203_CSESP\comparison_csesp.xlsx
City of Fresno–Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources Supporting Information

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Fresno–Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration
FirstCarbon Solutions
A.1 - Records Search Map

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form
1 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
ACCESS AND USE AGREEMENT NO.:_______________ IC FILE NO.:________________________ To: ___________________________________________________________________ Information Center Print Name: ____________________________________________________ Date: _____________________ Affiliation: ________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________________ City: _________________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: __________________ Phone: __________________ Fax: __________________ Email: ____________________________________ Billing Address (if different than above): _________________________________________________________ Billing Email: _______________________________________________ Billing Phone: ___________________ Project Name / Reference: ___________________________________________________________________ Project Street Address: ______________________________________________________________________ County or Counties: ________________________________________________________________________ Township/Range/UTMs: _____________________________________________________________________ USGS 7.5’ Quad(s): ________________________________________________________________________ PRIORITY RESPONSE (Additional Fee): yes / no
TOTAL FEE NOT TO EXCEED: $___________________________
(If blank, the Information Center will contact you if the fee is expected to exceed $1,000.00) Special Instructions:

Information Center Use Only
Date of CHRIS Data Provided for this Request: ___________________________________________________ Confidential Data Included in Response: yes / no
Notes: ___________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form
Mark the request form as needed. Attach a PDF of your project area (with the radius if applicable) mapped on a

7.5’ USGS topographic quadrangle to scale 1:24000 ratio 1:1 neither enlarged nor reduced and include a shapefile of your project area, if available. Shapefiles are the current CHRIS standard for submitting digital spatial data for your project area or radius. Check with the appropriate IC for current availability of digital data products.
• Documents will be provided in PDF format. Paper copies will only be provided if PDFs are not available at the time of the request or under specially arranged circumstances. • Location information will be provided as a digital map product (Custom Maps or GIS data) unless the area has not yet been digitized. In such circumstances, the IC may provide hand drawn maps. • In addition to the $150/hr. staff time fee, client will be charged the Custom Map fee when GIS is required to complete the request [e.g., a map printout or map image/PDF is requested and no GIS Data is requested, or an electronic product is requested (derived from GIS data) but no mapping is requested].

For product fees, see the CHRIS IC Fee Structure on the OHP website.

1. Map Format Choice:

Select One: Custom GIS Maps  GIS Data  Custom GIS Maps and GIS Data  No Maps  Any selection below left unmarked will be considered a "no. " Within project area Within ______ radius
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no
Within ______
radius
Location Information:

ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Locations1
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Locations
Report Locations1
“Other” Report Locations2

3. Database Information:
(contact the IC for product examples, or visit the SSJVIC website for examples) Within project area
ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Database1
List (PDF format) yes / no yes / no
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Database
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet yes / no yes / no
Report Database1
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet
Include “Other” Reports 2
yes / no yes / no

4. Document PDFs (paper copy only upon request):

Within project area Within ______
radius
ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Records1
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Records
Reports1
“Other” Reports2
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form

5. Eligibility Listings and Documentation:

Within project area Within ______
radius
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
OHP Built Environment Resources Directory3:

Directory listing only (Excel format)
Associated documentation4
OHP Archaeological Resources Directory1,5:

Directory listing only (Excel format)
Associated documentation4
California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976):

Directory listing only (PDF format)
Associated documentation4

6. Additional Information:

The following sources of information may be available through the Information Center. However, several of these sources are now available on the OHP website and can be accessed directly. The Office of Historic Preservation makes no guarantees about the availability, completeness, or accuracy of the information provided through these sources. Indicate below if the Information Center should review and provide documentation (if available) of any of the following sources as part of this request.

Caltrans Bridge Survey yes
/ no
/ no
yes
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
yes / no
Ethnographic Information
Historical Literature
Historical Maps
Local Inventories
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps
Shipwreck Inventory
Soil Survey Maps
1 In order to receive archaeological information, requestor must meet qualifications as specified in Section III of the current version of the California Historical Resources Information System Information Center Rules of Operation Manual and be identified as an Authorized User or Conditional User under an active CHRIS Access and Use Agreement. 2 “Other” Reports GIS layer consists of report study areas for which the report content is almost entirely non-fieldwork related (e.g., local/regional history, or overview) and/or for which the presentation of the study area boundary may or may not add value to a record search.
3 Provided as Excel spreadsheets with no cost for the rows; the only cost for this component is IC staff time. Includes, but not limited to, information regarding National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, California State Historical Landmarks, California State Points of Historical Interest, and historic building surveys. Previously known as the HRI and then as the HPD, it is now known as the Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD). The Office of Historic Preservation compiles this documentation and it is the source of the official status codes for evaluated resources. 4 Associated documentation will vary by resource. Contact the IC for further details. 5 Provided as Excel spreadsheets with no cost for the rows; the only cost for this component is IC staff time. Previously known as the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, now it is known as the Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD).

The Office of Historic Preservation compiles this documentation and it is the source of the official status codes for evaluated resources.
3 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
50000002 • 10/2021 | 50000002_record_search_map1.mxd CITY OF FRESNO

FRESNO CENTRAL SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

Dana DePietro
FirstCarbon Solutions
1350 Treat Blvd. Suite 380
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Re: Fresno Central Southeast Area Specific Plan Project Records Search File No.: 21-410
The Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Clovis, Malaga, and Fresno USGS 7.5’ quad. The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and the 0.5 mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☒ custom GIS maps ☐ GIS data
Resources within project area: 35 Resources, See attached list.

Resources within 0.5 mile radius: 33 Resources, See attached list.

Reports within project area: 18 Reports, See attached list.

Reports within 0.5 mile radius: 22 Reports, See attached list.

Note:

Resource Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed ☐ not available Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed ☐ not available Note: Only the Title Page, Table of Contents, & Executive Summary of TU-00102 was included.

OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Note: P-15-007046 is not listed in the BERD. The 2013 HPD page was included for this resource.

Caltrans Bridge Survey: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://dot.ca.gov/programs/environmental-analysis/cultural-studies/california-historical-bridges-tunnels Ethnographic Information: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Literature: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see
http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/
Local Inventories: Not available at SSJVIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx#searchTabIndex=0&searchByTypeIndex=1 and/or http://www.oac.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb8489p15p;developer=local;style=oac4;doc.view=items Shipwreck Inventory: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://www.slc.ca.gov/shipwrecks/
Soil Survey Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,
Jeremy E. David
Assistant Coordinator
SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
Reports in PA: Reports in .5 mile: Resources in PA: Resources in .5 mile: Informal Resource FR-00257 FR-00135 P-10-003930 P-10-004248 SHL #934
FR-00296 FR-01231 P-10-004249 P-10-004253
FR-01651 FR-01686 P-10-004675 P-10-004274
FR-01723 FR-01694 P-10-005306 P-10-004280
FR-01742 FR-01696 P-10-005307 P-10-004286
FR-01800 FR-01850 P-10-005308 P-10-004287
FR-01979 FR-02000 P-10-005309 P-10-004299
FR-02073 FR-02002 P-10-005310 P-10-004310
FR-02076 FR-02106 P-10-005311 P-10-004312
FR-02109 FR-02143 P-10-005312 P-10-004349
FR-02169 FR-02172 P-10-005313 P-10-004677
FR-02194 FR-02192 P-10-005314 P-10-004762
FR-02228 FR-02217 P-10-005315 P-10-004763
FR-02332 FR-02238 P-10-005316 P-10-004764
FR-02620 FR-02287 P-10-005317 P-10-004765
FR-02653 FR-02496 P-10-005318 P-10-004766
FR-02972 FR-02504 P-10-005319 P-10-004767
FR-02992 FR-02628 P-10-005320 P-10-004768
FR-02655 P-10-005321 P-10-004769
FR-02722 P-10-005322 P-10-004770
FR-02806 P-10-005323 P-10-005120
FR-02896 P-10-005324 P-10-005121
P-10-005325 P-10-005225
P-10-005326 P-10-005305
P-10-005327 P-10-006224
P-10-005328 P-10-006225
P-10-005329 P-10-006594
P-10-005330 P-10-006595
P-10-005331 P-10-006596
P-10-005332 P-10-006599
P-10-005333 P-10-006600
P-10-005334 P-10-006601
P-10-005335 P-10-007094
P-10-005336
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources SSJVIC Record Search 21-410
FR-00135 1995 Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Proposed Mojave Northward Expansion
Project.

Woodward-Clyde
Consultants
Hatoff, Brian, Voss, Barb,
Waechter, Sharon,
Benté, Vance, and Wee,
Stephen
NADB-R - 1140863
FR-00257 1990 Historic Property Survey Report Route 180 Chestnut Avenue to Highland Avenue; 06-
FRE-180, R60.9/R6736 06250-342400
DeLeuw, Cather and
Company; David Chavez
Associates
Caltrans - 06-FRE180 R60.9/R67.6
06250-342400
FR-00296 1992 Cultural Resources Assessment for the
Fresno Unified School District, Southeast
Fresno High School, Middle School, and
Elementary School
Cultural Resources
Consulting
NADB-R - 1140239 Bissonnette, Linda Dick
FR-01231 1994 Negative Archaeological Survey Report for the Construction of Route 180 Urban Project
California Department of
Transportation
Nissen, Karen, Comeyne,
Dominique, and AguilarLuna, Judy
Caltrans - 06-FRE180 P.M. 56.1/60.9
CU 821 EA 025731
FR-01231A 1993 Supplemental Historic Architectural Survey Report for the Route 180 Urban Project
Sections of Cedar Avenue and East Thomas
Avenue
Lortie, Frank Cal Trans
FR-01231B 1994 Supplemental Historic Property Survey
Report for the Route 180 Urban Project
between Route 99 and Chestnut Avenue
Aguilar-Luna, Judy Cal Trans
FR-01651 2000 Cultural Resources Survey for the Level (3) Communications Long Haul Fiber Optics
Project: Segment WS04: Sacramento to
Bakersfield
Far Western
Anthropological Research
Group, Inc.

Submitter - Project Nelson, Wendy J.

Number 27101
FR-01686 2000 Cultural Resources Assessment for the
Pacific Bell Site, CV-600-01, and the
Fairgrounds Site, City of Fresno, Fresno
County, California
Peak, Melinda A. Peak & Associates, Inc.

FR-01694 1994 Supplementary Historic Building Survey,
Historic Resources Survey (Ratkovich Plan),
Fresno, California
California State University,
Fresno
Powell, John Edward and
McGuire, Michael J.

FR-01696 2001 A Cultural Resource Study for the Self-Help Housing Project In the Southeast Fresno
Area, Fresno County, California
Varner, Dudley M. Varner Associates
FR-01723 2000 Historical and Cultural Resource Assessment For A Proposed Telecommunications Facility
Site No. CV-600-08, 4696 East Kings Canyon
Road, Fresno, California
Brown, R. Keith and Brown & Mills, Inc.

Pastron, Allen G.

Page 1 of 5 ends