Cities Index.
Exhibit N – Environmental Assessment (Including Studies)

Fresno City Council
June 29, 2023

Document
Exhibit N – Environmental Assessment (Including Studies)
Meeting
June 29, 2023
Body
Fresno City Council
Pages
35
Original file
14.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar2.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0781

0.6085

0.6885

1.2100e-
003

0.0248

0.0248

0.0239

0.0239

0.0000

99.8862

99.8862

0.0166

0.0000
100.3021
Total

0.0781

0.6085

0.6885

1.2100e-
003

0.0248

0.0248

0.0239

0.0239

0.0000

99.8862

99.8862

0.0166

0.0000
100.3021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

4.6000e-
004

0.0193

5.6600e-
003

9.0000e-
005

2.9200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.0400e-
003

8.4000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.3179

8.3179

4.0000e-
005

1.2500e-
003

8.6921
Worker

3.1500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0240

7.0000e-
005

8.7900e-
003

4.0000e-
005

8.8300e-
003

2.3400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.8260

6.8260

1.9000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

6.8860
Total

3.6100e-
003

0.0213

0.0297

1.6000e-
004

0.0117

1.6000e-
004

0.0119

3.1800e-
003

1.6000e-
004

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

15.1439

15.1439

2.3000e-
004

1.4400e-
003

15.5781
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 17 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0462

0.9531

0.7413

1.2100e-
003

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0000

99.8861

99.8861

0.0166

0.0000
100.3019
Total

0.0462

0.9531

0.7413

1.2100e-
003

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0000

99.8861

99.8861

0.0166

0.0000
100.3019
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

4.6000e-
004

0.0193

5.6600e-
003

9.0000e-
005

2.9200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.0400e-
003

8.4000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.3179

8.3179

4.0000e-
005

1.2500e-
003

8.6921
Worker

3.1500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0240

7.0000e-
005

8.7900e-
003

4.0000e-
005

8.8300e-
003

2.3400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.8260

6.8260

1.9000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

6.8860
Total

3.6100e-
003

0.0213

0.0297

1.6000e-
004

0.0117

1.6000e-
004

0.0119

3.1800e-
003

1.6000e-
004

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

15.1439

15.1439

2.3000e-
004

1.4400e-
003

15.5781
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 18 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.6300e-
003

0.0440

0.0662

1.0000e-
004

2.1100e-
003

2.1100e-
003

1.9500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0000

8.8306

8.8306

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Paving

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

5.2900e-
003

0.0440

0.0662

1.0000e-
004

2.1100e-
003

2.1100e-
003

1.9500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0000

8.8306

8.8306

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Total

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 19 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.1200e-
003

0.0881

0.0739

1.0000e-
004

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

0.0000

8.8305

8.8305

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Paving

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

4.7800e-
003

0.0881

0.0739

1.0000e-
004

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

0.0000

8.8305

8.8305

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Total

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 20 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.0860

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3600e-
003

9.1400e-
003

0.0136

2.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Total

0.0874

9.1400e-
003

0.0136

2.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Total

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 21 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.0860

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.5000e-
004

0.0176

0.0137

2.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Total

0.0869

0.0176

0.0137

2.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Total

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 22 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.1710

0.2497

1.4024

3.0600e-
003

0.2979

2.5700e-
003

0.3005

0.0797

2.4100e-
003

0.0821

0.0000
287.4111
287.4111

0.0176

0.0168
292.8682
Unmitigated

0.1710

0.2497

1.4024

3.0600e-
003

0.2979

2.5700e-
003

0.3005

0.0797

2.4100e-
003

0.0821

0.0000
287.4111
287.4111

0.0176

0.0168
292.8682

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
City Park

0.00 0.00

0.00 Medical Office Building
405.99
405.99
405.99
794,624
794,624
Parking Lot

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
405.99
405.99
405.99
794,624
794,624
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
City Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
66 28
6 Medical Office Building

9.50 7.30

7.30 29.60

51.40 19.00
60 30
10 Parking Lot

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 23 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ;:*
* i
Th !
h -r*
i I I
i
i
T r
i i
i i

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
City Park

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
Medical Office Building

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
Parking Lot

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

10.2949

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

10.2949

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
NaturalGas
Mitigated

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 24 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I=1 I

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I h

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I
4 ■# - -
■# - -
*

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
151164

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 25 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
151164

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 26 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
103428

9.5696

1.5500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.6642
Parking Lot
7840

0.7254

1.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

0.7326
Total

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 27 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
103428

9.5696

1.5500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.6642
Parking Lot
7840

0.7254

1.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

0.7326
Total

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 28 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Unmitigated

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

8.6000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0473

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Total

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 29 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -t
::
::
:

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

8.6000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0473

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Total

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 30 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Unmitigated

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
City Park
0 /

0.428933

0.1389

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1403
Medical Office
Building

1.46812 /

0.279642

1.2913

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.8321
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 31 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
City Park
0 /

0.428933

0.1389

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1403
Medical Office
Building

1.46812 /

0.279642

1.2913

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.8321
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 32 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Unmitigated

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
City Park

0.03 6.0900e-
003

3.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0151
Medical Office
Building
126.36

25.6499

1.5159

0.0000

63.5466
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 33 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
City Park

0.03 6.0900e-
003

3.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0151
Medical Office
Building
126.36

25.6499

1.5159

0.0000

63.5466
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 34 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 11:21 AM

Page 35 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Valley Health Team
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total project site is 1.23 acres
Construction Phase - Construction is expected to start on July 2023 and last 12-14 months Grading - Set to default
Demolition -
Vehicle Trips - Trips rates based of 104 total daily trips Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mitigation Tier 2

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Single Family Housing

11.00 Dwelling Unit

1.23 19,800.00
31 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
0 15
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

3.57 1.23
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

9.54 9.45
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 1 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied JL -S_ X -L X
!!
4 !!4
i

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

8.55 9.45
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

9.44 9.45
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 2 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 ■p
■ ■ I
i.

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.0989

0.7969

0.8238

1.4800e-
003

0.0244

0.0353

0.0597

0.0109

0.0338

0.0446

0.0000
124.1503
124.1503

0.0231

2.4000e-
004
124.8010
2024

0.2588

0.5690

0.6603

1.1700e-
003

2.4100e-
003

0.0234

0.0258

6.5000e-
004

0.0225

0.0231

0.0000

96.8703

96.8703

0.0165

1.8000e-
004

97.3368
Maximum

0.2588

0.7969

0.8238

1.4800e-
003

0.0244

0.0353

0.0597

0.0109

0.0338

0.0446

0.0000
124.1503
124.1503

0.0231

2.4000e-
004
124.8010
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.0989

0.7969

0.8238

1.4800e-
003

0.0128

0.0353

0.0481

5.3700e-
003

0.0338

0.0391

0.0000
124.1502
124.1502

0.0231

2.4000e-
004
124.8008
2024

0.2588

0.5690

0.6603

1.1700e-
003

2.4100e-
003

0.0234

0.0258

6.5000e-
004

0.0225

0.0231

0.0000

96.8702

96.8702

0.0165

1.8000e-
004

97.3367
Maximum

0.2588

0.7969

0.8238

1.4800e-
003

0.0128

0.0353

0.0481

5.3700e-
003

0.0338

0.0391

0.0000
124.1502
124.1502

0.0231

2.4000e-
004
124.8008
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 3 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

43.28 0.00

13.58 47.65

0.00 8.09

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 7-3-2023
10-2-2023

0.4670

0.4670
2 10-3-2023
1-2-2024

0.4365

0.4365
3 1-3-2024
4-2-2024

0.4079

0.4079
4 4-3-2024
7-2-2024

0.4093

0.4093
Highest

0.4670

0.4670

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1239

8.7700e-
003

0.3110

7.7000e-
004

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

4.9726

4.8987

9.8713

0.0235

9.0000e-
005

10.4839
Energy

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

22.2257

22.2257

1.5800e-
003

4.2000e-
004

22.3898
Mobile

0.0511

0.0864

0.4839

1.1600e-
003

0.1142

9.5000e-
004

0.1151

0.0306

8.9000e-
004

0.0314

0.0000
108.5269
108.5269

5.6300e-
003

5.8900e-
003
110.4215
Waste

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

2.2654

0.0000

2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Water

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.2274

0.5051

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Total

0.1764

0.1074

0.8001

2.0100e-
003

0.1142

0.0399

0.1540

0.0306

0.0398

0.0704

7.4653
136.1564
143.6217

0.1880

6.9600e-
003
150.3932
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 4 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.1239

8.7700e-
003

0.3110

7.7000e-
004

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

4.9726

4.8987

9.8713

0.0235

9.0000e-
005

10.4839
Energy

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

22.2257

22.2257

1.5800e-
003

4.2000e-
004

22.3898
Mobile

0.0511

0.0864

0.4839

1.1600e-
003

0.1142

9.5000e-
004

0.1151

0.0306

8.9000e-
004

0.0314

0.0000
108.5269
108.5269

5.6300e-
003

5.8900e-
003
110.4215
Waste

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

2.2654

0.0000

2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Water

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.2274

0.5051

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Total

0.1764

0.1074

0.8001

2.0100e-
003

0.1142

0.0399

0.1540

0.0306

0.0398

0.0704

7.4653
136.1564
143.6217

0.1880

6.9600e-
003
150.3932
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
7/3/2023
7/28/2023
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
7/29/2023
8/1/2023
5 2
3 Grading
Grading
8/2/2023
8/7/2023
5 4
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 5 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
■*
■*
I
I
I
■L ■L
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/8/2023
5/13/2024
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
5/14/2024
5/27/2024
5 10
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
5/28/2024
6/10/2024
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 6.00
9 0.56
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
1 6.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 6.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 40,095; Residential Outdoor: 13,365; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 6 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 > H- 4- 4- 4- 4-
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
5 13.00

0.00 6.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 4.00

1.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 1.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 7 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I ■H- +• ■+
ii i
ii i
i
■ ■
—
i- r*
i- r*
i- r*
i- r*
1 3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.8000e-
004

0.0000

6.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.8000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

7.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
004

6.3300e-
003

6.4300e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

1.0000e-
005

3.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1700

0.1700

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.1779
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

3.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.9975

0.9975

2.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.0132
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 8 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

3.1000e-
004

0.0000

3.1000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000

21.0865

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

7.0800e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.3300e-
003

6.3800e-
003

0.0000

21.0865

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

1.0000e-
005

3.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1700

0.1700

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.1779
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

3.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.9975

0.9975

2.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.0132
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 9 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.2700e-
003

0.0000

6.2700e-
003

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

5.1000e-
004

5.1000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.5114

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Total

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.2700e-
003

5.1000e-
004

6.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
003

4.7000e-
004

3.4700e-
003

0.0000

1.5114

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0509

0.0000

0.0000

0.0514
Total

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0509

0.0000

0.0000

0.0514
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 10 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

2.8200e-
003

1.3500e-
003

0.0000

1.3500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

5.1000e-
004

5.1000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.5114

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Total

1.1300e-
003

0.0124

6.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8200e-
003

5.1000e-
004

3.3300e-
003

1.3500e-
003

4.7000e-
004

1.8200e-
003

0.0000

1.5114

1.5114

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5236
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0509

0.0000

0.0000

0.0514
Total

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0509

0.0509

0.0000

0.0000

0.0514
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 11 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0142

0.0000

0.0142

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

1.2100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Total

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

0.0142

1.2100e-
003

0.0154

6.8500e-
003

1.1100e-
003

7.9600e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.1273

0.0000

0.0000

0.1285
Total

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.1273

0.0000

0.0000

0.1285
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 12 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.3700e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0000

3.0800e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

1.2100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Total

2.6700e-
003

0.0289

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

6.3700e-
003

1.2100e-
003

7.5800e-
003

3.0800e-
003

1.1100e-
003

4.1900e-
003

0.0000

3.6208

3.6208

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6501
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.1273

0.0000

0.0000

0.1285
Total

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

4.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.6000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1273

0.1273

0.0000

0.0000

0.1285
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 13 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0792

0.6089

0.6558

1.1500e-
003

0.0268

0.0268

0.0258

0.0258

0.0000

94.4315

94.4315

0.0160

0.0000

94.8324
Total

0.0792

0.6089

0.6558

1.1500e-
003

0.0268

0.0268

0.0258

0.0258

0.0000

94.4315

94.4315

0.0160

0.0000

94.8324
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

6.0000e-
005

2.2800e-
003

6.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.0001

1.0001

1.0000e-
005

1.5000e-
004

1.0451
Worker

6.4000e-
004

4.2000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.3241

1.3241

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3364
Total

7.0000e-
004

2.7000e-
003

5.6000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.0300e-
003

5.4000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3242

2.3242

5.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

2.3815
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 14 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0792

0.6089

0.6558

1.1500e-
003

0.0268

0.0268

0.0258

0.0258

0.0000

94.4314

94.4314

0.0160

0.0000

94.8323
Total

0.0792

0.6089

0.6558

1.1500e-
003

0.0268

0.0268

0.0258

0.0258

0.0000

94.4314

94.4314

0.0160

0.0000

94.8323
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

6.0000e-
005

2.2800e-
003

6.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.0001

1.0001

1.0000e-
005

1.5000e-
004

1.0451
Worker

6.4000e-
004

4.2000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.3241

1.3241

4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3364
Total

7.0000e-
004

2.7000e-
003

5.6000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.0300e-
003

5.4000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3242

2.3242

5.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

2.3815
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 15 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0682

0.5311

0.6008

1.0600e-
003

0.0216

0.0216

0.0209

0.0209

0.0000

87.1734

87.1734

0.0145

0.0000

87.5363
Total

0.0682

0.5311

0.6008

1.0600e-
003

0.0216

0.0216

0.0209

0.0209

0.0000

87.1734

87.1734

0.0145

0.0000

87.5363
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.0000e-
005

2.1100e-
003

6.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.9074

0.9074

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.9482
Worker

5.5000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

4.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.1915

1.1915

3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.2019
Total

6.0000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

4.8100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8700e-
003

5.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

5.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.0989

2.0989

3.0000e-
005

1.7000e-
004

2.1502
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 16 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0682

0.5311

0.6008

1.0600e-
003

0.0216

0.0216

0.0209

0.0209

0.0000

87.1733

87.1733

0.0145

0.0000

87.5362
Total

0.0682

0.5311

0.6008

1.0600e-
003

0.0216

0.0216

0.0209

0.0209

0.0000

87.1733

87.1733

0.0145

0.0000

87.5362
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

5.0000e-
005

2.1100e-
003

6.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

9.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.9074

0.9074

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.9482
Worker

5.5000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

4.1900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

4.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.1915

1.1915

3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.2019
Total

6.0000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

4.8100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8700e-
003

5.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

5.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.0989

2.0989

3.0000e-
005

1.7000e-
004

2.1502
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 17 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

3.0900e-
003

0.0293

0.0441

7.0000e-
005

1.4100e-
003

1.4100e-
003

1.3000e-
003

1.3000e-
003

0.0000

5.8870

5.8870

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9337
Paving

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

3.0900e-
003

0.0293

0.0441

7.0000e-
005

1.4100e-
003

1.4100e-
003

1.3000e-
003

1.3000e-
003

0.0000

5.8870

5.8870

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9337
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.9000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4034

0.4034

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4069
Total

1.9000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4034

0.4034

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4069
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 18 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

3.0900e-
003

0.0293

0.0441

7.0000e-
005

1.4100e-
003

1.4100e-
003

1.3000e-
003

1.3000e-
003

0.0000

5.8870

5.8870

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9337
Paving

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

3.0900e-
003

0.0293

0.0441

7.0000e-
005

1.4100e-
003

1.4100e-
003

1.3000e-
003

1.3000e-
003

0.0000

5.8870

5.8870

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9337
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.9000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4034

0.4034

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4069
Total

1.9000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.4200e-
003

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

0.0000

5.2000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

0.4034

0.4034

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4069
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 19 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.1858

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.0000e-
004

6.0900e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Total

0.1867

6.0900e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0310

0.0310

0.0000

0.0000

0.0313
Total

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0310

0.0310

0.0000

0.0000

0.0313
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 20 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.1858

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

9.0000e-
004

6.0900e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Total

0.1867

6.0900e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0310

0.0310

0.0000

0.0000

0.0313
Total

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0310

0.0310

0.0000

0.0000

0.0313
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 21 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■*

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0511

0.0864

0.4839

1.1600e-
003

0.1142

9.5000e-
004

0.1151

0.0306

8.9000e-
004

0.0314

0.0000
108.5269
108.5269

5.6300e-
003

5.8900e-
003
110.4215
Unmitigated

0.0511

0.0864

0.4839

1.1600e-
003

0.1142

9.5000e-
004

0.1151

0.0306

8.9000e-
004

0.0314

0.0000
108.5269
108.5269

5.6300e-
003

5.8900e-
003
110.4215

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Single Family Housing
103.95
103.95
103.95
304,539
304,539
Total
103.95
103.95
103.95
304,539
304,539
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Single Family Housing

10.80 7.30

7.50 48.40

15.90 35.70
86 11
3 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Single Family Housing

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 22 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I I I 3

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

8.1156

8.1156

1.3100e-
003

1.6000e-
004

8.1958
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

8.1156

8.1156

1.3100e-
003

1.6000e-
004

8.1958
NaturalGas
Mitigated

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

14.1101

14.1101

2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1939
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

14.1101

14.1101

2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1939

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 23 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■* - -
+

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
264413

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

14.1101

14.1101

2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1939
Total

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

14.1101

14.1101

2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1939
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
264413

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

14.1101

14.1101

2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1939
Total

1.4300e-
003

0.0122

5.1800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

9.9000e-
004

0.0000

14.1101

14.1101

2.7000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

14.1939
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 24 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I
:i.
i.
i.
ii

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
87713.6

8.1156

1.3100e-
003

1.6000e-
004

8.1958
Total

8.1156

1.3100e-
003

1.6000e-
004

8.1958
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
87713.6

8.1156

1.3100e-
003

1.6000e-
004

8.1958
Total

8.1156

1.3100e-
003

1.6000e-
004

8.1958
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 25 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied k,I
i.
i.
i.
k, I I I
k, I I I
il I I I
ii
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.1239

8.7700e-
003

0.3110

7.7000e-
004

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

4.9726

4.8987

9.8713

0.0235

9.0000e-
005

10.4839
Unmitigated

0.1239

8.7700e-
003

0.3110

7.7000e-
004

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

4.9726

4.8987

9.8713

0.0235

9.0000e-
005

10.4839

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0186

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0773

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

0.0256

7.8300e-
003

0.2294

7.7000e-
004

0.0375

0.0375

0.0375

0.0375

4.9726

4.7653

9.7378

0.0233

9.0000e-
005

10.3473
Landscaping

2.4500e-
003

9.4000e-
004

0.0816

0.0000

4.5000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

0.0000

0.1334

0.1334

1.3000e-
004

0.0000

0.1366
Total

0.1239

8.7700e-
003

0.3110

7.7000e-
004

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

4.9726

4.8987

9.8713

0.0235

9.0000e-
005

10.4839
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 26 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied *

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0186

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0773

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth

0.0256

7.8300e-
003

0.2294

7.7000e-
004

0.0375

0.0375

0.0375

0.0375

4.9726

4.7653

9.7378

0.0233

9.0000e-
005

10.3473
Landscaping

2.4500e-
003

9.4000e-
004

0.0816

0.0000

4.5000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

4.5000e-
004

0.0000

0.1334

0.1334

1.3000e-
004

0.0000

0.1366
Total

0.1239

8.7700e-
003

0.3110

7.7000e-
004

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

0.0379

4.9726

4.8987

9.8713

0.0235

9.0000e-
005

10.4839
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 27 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ■# - -
-*
■*
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Unmitigated

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

0.716694 /

0.451829

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Total

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 28 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1. tlI
i.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

0.716694 /

0.451829

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Total

0.7325

0.0234

5.6000e-
004

1.4857
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Unmitigated

2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 29 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tl I I II
i. I I I
i. I I I
i.

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

11.16 2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Total

2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

11.16 2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Total

2.2654

0.1339

0.0000

5.6124
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 30 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied k, II
k. I
i. I

1. il I
k, I
A. i
i.

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/21/2022 5:05 PM

Page 31 of 31 ends

Valley Health Team - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total project site is 1.23 acres
Construction Phase - Construction is expected to start on July 2023 and last 12-14 months Demolition -
Grading - Set to default
Vehicle Trips - Trips rates based of 406 total daily trips and taking into account 10% bus trips and 25% telemedicine appointments. Also revised the trip lenght to reflect that patients and visitors would be from within Pinedale.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mitigation Tier 2

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Medical Office Building

11.70 1000sqft

0.37 11,700.00
0 Parking Lot

56.00 Space

0.50 22,400.00
0 City Park

0.36 Acre

0.36 15,681.60
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
0 15
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 1 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I
I
I
-5. ± -L
J.
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 8.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated

0.00 3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 2
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays

10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays

4.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays

10.00 15.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 2 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 4 r!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
-i-
i
mm

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays

2.00 10.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

0.27 0.37
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL

7.30 2.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL

7.30 2.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL

9.50 2.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.57 22.60
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

1.42 22.60
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

34.80 22.60
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 3 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 4 r!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
T
!!
-i-
i
mm

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.0995

0.8231

0.8101

1.5700e-
003

0.0788

0.0356

0.1144

0.0353

0.0339

0.0693

0.0000
133.6389
133.6389

0.0249

1.2700e-
003
134.6395
2024

0.1747

0.6831

0.8007

1.5100e-
003

0.0127

0.0275

0.0403

3.4500e-
003

0.0265

0.0299

0.0000
126.5668
126.5668

0.0198

1.4600e-
003
127.4965
Maximum

0.1747

0.8231

0.8101

1.5700e-
003

0.0788

0.0356

0.1144

0.0353

0.0339

0.0693

0.0000
133.6389
133.6389

0.0249

1.4600e-
003
134.6395
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2023

0.0561

1.1756

0.9018

1.5700e-
003

0.0417

0.0446

0.0863

0.0176

0.0445

0.0621

0.0000
133.6388
133.6388

0.0249

1.2700e-
003
134.6393
2024

0.1418

1.0803

0.8614

1.5100e-
003

0.0127

0.0442

0.0569

3.4500e-
003

0.0442

0.0476

0.0000
126.5667
126.5667

0.0198

1.4600e-
003
127.4964
Maximum

0.1418

1.1756

0.9018

1.5700e-
003

0.0417

0.0446

0.0863

0.0176

0.0445

0.0621

0.0000
133.6388
133.6388

0.0249

1.4600e-
003
134.6393
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 4 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

27.84 -49.78
-9.47

0.00 40.51
-40.54

7.42 45.75
-46.86
-10.66

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 7-3-2023
10-2-2023

0.4499

0.5924
2 10-3-2023
1-2-2024

0.4499

0.6126
3 1-3-2024
4-2-2024

0.4208

0.6056
4 4-3-2024
7-2-2024

0.3588

0.5215
5 7-3-2024
9-30-2024

0.0460

0.0498
Highest

0.4499

0.6126

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Energy

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

18.3616

18.3616

1.8200e-
003

3.5000e-
004

18.5114
Mobile

0.0836

0.0766

0.4359

5.7000e-
004

0.0491

5.7000e-
004

0.0496

0.0131

5.3000e-
004

0.0137

0.0000

53.5540

53.5540

7.0700e-
003

4.9500e-
003

55.2059
Waste

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

25.6560

0.0000

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Water

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.4658

0.9645

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Total

0.1403

0.0841

0.4427

6.1000e-
004

0.0491

1.1300e-
003

0.0502

0.0131

1.0900e-
003

0.0142

26.1218

72.8813

99.0031

1.5731

6.4500e-
003
140.2527
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 5 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Energy

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

18.3616

18.3616

1.8200e-
003

3.5000e-
004

18.5114
Mobile

0.0836

0.0766

0.4359

5.7000e-
004

0.0491

5.7000e-
004

0.0496

0.0131

5.3000e-
004

0.0137

0.0000

53.5540

53.5540

7.0700e-
003

4.9500e-
003

55.2059
Waste

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

25.6560

0.0000

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Water

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.4658

0.9645

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Total

0.1403

0.0841

0.4427

6.1000e-
004

0.0491

1.1300e-
003

0.0502

0.0131

1.0900e-
003

0.0142

26.1218

72.8813

99.0031

1.5731

6.4500e-
003
140.2527
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
7/3/2023
7/28/2023
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
7/31/2023
8/11/2023
5 10
3 Grading
Grading
8/14/2023
8/25/2023
5 10
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 6 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
■*
■*
I
I
I
■L ■L
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/28/2023
5/31/2024
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
6/3/2024
6/21/2024
5 15
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
6/24/2024
7/12/2024
5 15
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
1 6.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 6.00
9 0.56
Paving
Pavers
1 6.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 17,550; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,850; Striped Parking Area: 1,344 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9.38
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10
Acres of Paving: 0.5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 7 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 > H- 4- 4- 4- 4-
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h
h h

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
5 13.00

0.00 6.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 20.00

8.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 4.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 8 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I ■H- +• ■+
ii i
ii i
i
■ ■
—
i- r*
i- r*
i- r*
i- r*
1 3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.8000e-
004

0.0000

6.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

6.7700e-
003

6.3300e-
003

6.3300e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

0.0147

0.1432

0.1346

2.4000e-
004

6.8000e-
004

6.7700e-
003

7.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
004

6.3300e-
003

6.4300e-
003

0.0000

21.0866

21.0866

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

1.0000e-
005

3.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1700

0.1700

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.1779
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

3.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.9975

0.9975

2.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.0132
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 9 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

3.1000e-
004

0.0000

3.1000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.8600e-
003

0.2121

0.1542

2.4000e-
004

7.1800e-
003

7.1800e-
003

7.1800e-
003

7.1800e-
003

0.0000

21.0865

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Total

8.8600e-
003

0.2121

0.1542

2.4000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

7.1800e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

7.1800e-
003

7.2300e-
003

0.0000

21.0865

21.0865

5.3500e-
003

0.0000

21.2202
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

1.0000e-
005

3.8000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1700

0.1700

0.0000

3.0000e-
005

0.1779
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.0000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

3.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

2.8000e-
004

0.0000

0.8276

0.8276

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.8353
Total

4.1000e-
004

6.4000e-
004

3.1500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

0.0000

3.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.9975

0.9975

2.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.0132
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 10 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0313

0.0000

0.0313

0.0150

0.0000

0.0150

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

5.6700e-
003

0.0621

0.0332

9.0000e-
005

2.5400e-
003

2.5400e-
003

2.3300e-
003

2.3300e-
003

0.0000

7.5571

7.5571

2.4400e-
003

0.0000

7.6182
Total

5.6700e-
003

0.0621

0.0332

9.0000e-
005

0.0313

2.5400e-
003

0.0339

0.0150

2.3300e-
003

0.0174

0.0000

7.5571

7.5571

2.4400e-
003

0.0000

7.6182
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Total

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 11 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0141

0.0000

0.0141

6.7600e-
003

0.0000

6.7600e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.4500e-
003

0.0747

0.0491

9.0000e-
005

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

7.5571

7.5571

2.4400e-
003

0.0000

7.6182
Total

2.4500e-
003

0.0747

0.0491

9.0000e-
005

0.0141

1.8700e-
003

0.0160

6.7600e-
003

1.8700e-
003

8.6300e-
003

0.0000

7.5571

7.5571

2.4400e-
003

0.0000

7.6182
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Total

1.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

9.5000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

3.2000e-
004

8.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.2546

0.2546

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.2570
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 12 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0354

0.0000

0.0354

0.0171

0.0000

0.0171

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

6.6700e-
003

0.0723

0.0435

1.0000e-
004

3.0200e-
003

3.0200e-
003

2.7800e-
003

2.7800e-
003

0.0000

9.0520

9.0520

2.9300e-
003

0.0000

9.1252
Total

6.6700e-
003

0.0723

0.0435

1.0000e-
004

0.0354

3.0200e-
003

0.0384

0.0171

2.7800e-
003

0.0199

0.0000

9.0520

9.0520

2.9300e-
003

0.0000

9.1252
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.3183

0.3183

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3213
Total

1.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.3183

0.3183

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3213
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 13 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0159

0.0000

0.0159

7.7100e-
003

0.0000

7.7100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

3.1300e-
003

0.0905

0.0607

1.0000e-
004

2.4300e-
003

2.4300e-
003

2.4300e-
003

2.4300e-
003

0.0000

9.0520

9.0520

2.9300e-
003

0.0000

9.1251
Total

3.1300e-
003

0.0905

0.0607

1.0000e-
004

0.0159

2.4300e-
003

0.0184

7.7100e-
003

2.4300e-
003

0.0101

0.0000

9.0520

9.0520

2.9300e-
003

0.0000

9.1251
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.3183

0.3183

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3213
Total

1.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

0.0000

4.0000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.3183

0.3183

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.3213
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 14 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0686

0.5270

0.5675

9.9000e-
004

0.0232

0.0232

0.0224

0.0224

0.0000

81.7196

81.7196

0.0139

0.0000

82.0665
Total

0.0686

0.5270

0.5675

9.9000e-
004

0.0232

0.0232

0.0224

0.0224

0.0000

81.7196

81.7196

0.0139

0.0000

82.0665
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

3.9000e-
004

0.0158

4.7400e-
003

7.0000e-
005

2.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
004

2.4900e-
003

6.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

7.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.9237

6.9237

4.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

7.2352
Worker

2.7900e-
003

1.8100e-
003

0.0213

6.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

7.2300e-
003

1.9100e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.9400e-
003

0.0000

5.7295

5.7295

1.7000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

5.7827
Total

3.1800e-
003

0.0176

0.0260

1.3000e-
004

9.5900e-
003

1.3000e-
004

9.7200e-
003

2.6000e-
003

1.3000e-
004

2.7300e-
003

0.0000

12.6532

12.6532

2.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
003

13.0179
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 15 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0378

0.7798

0.6065

9.9000e-
004

0.0329

0.0329

0.0329

0.0329

0.0000

81.7195

81.7195

0.0139

0.0000

82.0664
Total

0.0378

0.7798

0.6065

9.9000e-
004

0.0329

0.0329

0.0329

0.0329

0.0000

81.7195

81.7195

0.0139

0.0000

82.0664
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

3.9000e-
004

0.0158

4.7400e-
003

7.0000e-
005

2.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
004

2.4900e-
003

6.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

7.9000e-
004

0.0000

6.9237

6.9237

4.0000e-
005

1.0400e-
003

7.2352
Worker

2.7900e-
003

1.8100e-
003

0.0213

6.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

7.2300e-
003

1.9100e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.9400e-
003

0.0000

5.7295

5.7295

1.7000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

5.7827
Total

3.1800e-
003

0.0176

0.0260

1.3000e-
004

9.5900e-
003

1.3000e-
004

9.7200e-
003

2.6000e-
003

1.3000e-
004

2.7300e-
003

0.0000

12.6532

12.6532

2.1000e-
004

1.2000e-
003

13.0179
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 16 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0781

0.6085

0.6885

1.2100e-
003

0.0248

0.0248

0.0239

0.0239

0.0000

99.8862

99.8862

0.0166

0.0000
100.3021
Total

0.0781

0.6085

0.6885

1.2100e-
003

0.0248

0.0248

0.0239

0.0239

0.0000

99.8862

99.8862

0.0166

0.0000
100.3021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

4.6000e-
004

0.0193

5.6600e-
003

9.0000e-
005

2.9200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.0400e-
003

8.4000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.3179

8.3179

4.0000e-
005

1.2500e-
003

8.6921
Worker

3.1500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0240

7.0000e-
005

8.7900e-
003

4.0000e-
005

8.8300e-
003

2.3400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.8260

6.8260

1.9000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

6.8860
Total

3.6100e-
003

0.0213

0.0297

1.6000e-
004

0.0117

1.6000e-
004

0.0119

3.1800e-
003

1.6000e-
004

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

15.1439

15.1439

2.3000e-
004

1.4400e-
003

15.5781
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 17 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0462

0.9531

0.7413

1.2100e-
003

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0000

99.8861

99.8861

0.0166

0.0000
100.3019
Total

0.0462

0.9531

0.7413

1.2100e-
003

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0402

0.0000

99.8861

99.8861

0.0166

0.0000
100.3019
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

4.6000e-
004

0.0193

5.6600e-
003

9.0000e-
005

2.9200e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.0400e-
003

8.4000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

9.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.3179

8.3179

4.0000e-
005

1.2500e-
003

8.6921
Worker

3.1500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0240

7.0000e-
005

8.7900e-
003

4.0000e-
005

8.8300e-
003

2.3400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3700e-
003

0.0000

6.8260

6.8260

1.9000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

6.8860
Total

3.6100e-
003

0.0213

0.0297

1.6000e-
004

0.0117

1.6000e-
004

0.0119

3.1800e-
003

1.6000e-
004

3.3300e-
003

0.0000

15.1439

15.1439

2.3000e-
004

1.4400e-
003

15.5781
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 18 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I ■ I
:i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.6300e-
003

0.0440

0.0662

1.0000e-
004

2.1100e-
003

2.1100e-
003

1.9500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0000

8.8306

8.8306

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Paving

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

5.2900e-
003

0.0440

0.0662

1.0000e-
004

2.1100e-
003

2.1100e-
003

1.9500e-
003

1.9500e-
003

0.0000

8.8306

8.8306

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Total

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 19 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

4.1200e-
003

0.0881

0.0739

1.0000e-
004

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

0.0000

8.8305

8.8305

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Paving

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

4.7800e-
003

0.0881

0.0739

1.0000e-
004

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

3.0900e-
003

0.0000

8.8305

8.8305

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.9005
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Total

2.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

2.1300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000

7.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.6050

0.6050

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.6104
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 20 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.0860

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3600e-
003

9.1400e-
003

0.0136

2.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Total

0.0874

9.1400e-
003

0.0136

2.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Total

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 21 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.0860

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.5000e-
004

0.0176

0.0137

2.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Total

0.0869

0.0176

0.0137

2.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9149

1.9149

1.1000e-
004

0.0000

1.9176
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Total

9.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1862

0.1862

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.1878
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 22 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0836

0.0766

0.4359

5.7000e-
004

0.0491

5.7000e-
004

0.0496

0.0131

5.3000e-
004

0.0137

0.0000

53.5540

53.5540

7.0700e-
003

4.9500e-
003

55.2059
Unmitigated

0.0836

0.0766

0.4359

5.7000e-
004

0.0491

5.7000e-
004

0.0496

0.0131

5.3000e-
004

0.0137

0.0000

53.5540

53.5540

7.0700e-
003

4.9500e-
003

55.2059

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
City Park

0.00 0.00

0.00 Medical Office Building
264.42
264.42
264.42
130,898
130,898
Parking Lot

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
264.42
264.42
264.42
130,898
130,898
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
City Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
66 28
6 Medical Office Building

2.00 2.00

2.00 29.60

51.40 19.00
60 30
10 Parking Lot

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 23 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ;:*
* i
Th !
h -r*
i I I
i
i
T r
i i
i i

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
City Park

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
Medical Office Building

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975
Parking Lot

0.515888

0.053153

0.175761

0.156529

0.025865

0.006829

0.014141

0.022504

0.000707

0.000289

0.023863

0.001496

0.002975

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

10.2949

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

10.2949

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
NaturalGas
Mitigated

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 24 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I I I I I I I I=1 I

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I h

I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I
4 ■# - -
■# - -
*

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
151164

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 25 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
151164

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

8.2000e-
004

7.4100e-
003

6.2200e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

0.0000

8.0667

8.0667

1.5000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

8.1146
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 26 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
103428

9.5696

1.5500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.6642
Parking Lot
7840

0.7254

1.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

0.7326
Total

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 27 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Medical Office
Building
103428

9.5696

1.5500e-
003

1.9000e-
004

9.6642
Parking Lot
7840

0.7254

1.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

0.7326
Total

10.2949

1.6700e-
003

2.0000e-
004

10.3967
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 28 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Unmitigated

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

8.6000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0473

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Total

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 29 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -t
::
::
:

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

8.6000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0473

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Total

0.0560

1.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.2200e-
003

1.2200e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.3000e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 30 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied -*
-*
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Unmitigated

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
City Park
0 /

0.428933

0.1389

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1403
Medical Office
Building

1.46812 /

0.279642

1.2913

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.8321
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 31 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
City Park
0 /

0.428933

0.1389

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1403
Medical Office
Building

1.46812 /

0.279642

1.2913

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.8321
Parking Lot
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

1.4302

0.0480

1.1500e-
003

2.9724
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 32 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Unmitigated

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
City Park

0.03 6.0900e-
003

3.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0151
Medical Office
Building
126.36

25.6499

1.5159

0.0000

63.5466
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 33 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
City Park

0.03 6.0900e-
003

3.6000e-
004

0.0000

0.0151
Medical Office
Building
126.36

25.6499

1.5159

0.0000

63.5466
Parking Lot
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

25.6560

1.5162

0.0000

63.5617
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 34 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/22/2022 2:08 PM

Page 35 of 35 ends

Valley Health Team - Reduced Vehicle Trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Appendix B Cultural Resource Assessment

CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE

VALLEY HEALTH TEAM PROJECT AREA,

PINEDALE, COUNTY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA

Prepared by

Melinda A. Peak
Peak & Associates, Inc.
3941 Park Drive, Suite 20-329
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
(916) 939-2405

Prepared for

Valley Health Team

March 3, 2022
(Job #22-010)

1 INTRODUCTION

The proposed undertaking involves the development of a medical clinic with related parking and landscaping on a project area within the City of Fresno, California. The roughly 1.5-acre tract is located to the south of West Fir Street, west of North Sugar Pine Avenue, and north of West Beechwood Avenue.

The project area is located in section 33, Township 1 2 South, Range 20 East, mapped on the Herndon USGS topographic quadrangle (Figures 1 and 2).

Melinda A. Peak, senior historian/archeologist with Peak & Associates, Inc. served as principal investigator for the study with Michael Lawson (resumes, Appendix 1) completing the field survey.

STATE REGULATIONS

State historic preservation regulations affecting this project include the statutes and guidelines contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 and sections 15064.5 and 15126.4 (b) of the CEQA Guidelines). CEQA Section 15064.5 requires that lead agencies determine whether projects may have a significant effect on archaeological and historical resources. Public Resources Code Section 21098.1 further cites: A project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.

An “historical resource” includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record or manuscript that is historically or archa eologically significant (Public Resources Code section 5020.1).

Advice on procedures to identify such resources, evaluate their importance, and estimate potential effects is given in several agency publications such as the series produced by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CEQA and Archaeological Resources, 1994. The technical advice series produced by OPR strongly recommends that Native American concerns and the concerns of other interested persons and corporate entities, including, but not limited to, museums, historical commissions, associations and societies be solicited as part of the process of cultural resources inventory. In addition, California law protects Native American burials, skeletal remains, and associated grave goo ds regardless of the antiquity and provides for the sensitive treatment and disposition of those remains (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, California Public Resources Codes Sections 5097.94 et al).

The California Register of Historical Resources (Public Resources Code Section 5020 et seq.)

The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) maintains the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Properties listed, or formally designated as eligible for listing, on the National

SUBDIVIDED LAND IN POR. SEC.33, T. 12 S„ R.20 E„ M.D.B.& M. Tax Rate Area 303-16
■■
S 3i4 s-m
VHT PINEDALE PROJECT %\
\ jj 1‘m 1 00'■3 TAT
;ST, aW. FIR :: x;4 5c 1 -i.. A —
■“F- r-- -FT-Tr; - r -:
if T .■ir >'2?rr ;i
I 3
I I
3S 3D 40
r i
ii
£fiLi i s'. ■
£ dT ‘4,2 *3!S 13 2c; 2? 22 23.24 25 i » ?? 25 JP : 10 31 | 3* 33 | 34 35 36 3? ? © 11 , 12 13,14 16 TG . 17 2 3 4 5 16 ■-UI: .
■:

Z-i 3
3 -i
®j
I4
■ia> S' #© [<§> ■;s Cl-I.ran
^;*>4m. w
,j ■
C£
X27 @i Sj
■■G
&®1 o ' .CO.** '■3 „ .
to i <0Jr II
! JI ' '
47 45 $45 - V, Ki*1 ti 54 53 11 I 10 9. 74 ; 73 72 \n TO as' if £2 j si SO ' 49 48US ffl 07 ' -SB 6G S3JO 7*. 7# 77 W 75 ■ i
1 1 -Sfj
' I
\'rXS| *8
■i • Ili 1
ror j-lJZu 3UTL*- 23- I ■ -- L.-. L: J.!*- ■-!' J X' ^
±*■ 4- iJr 4r
f 4r J
@ - ®S l/V. z BEECHWOOD
■■
AVE.■
ft fa
■-
* .■t .f * -■i ■--i
T- ™7”:—:— “ T-~~&r&7 Tr23-r *
' 'I
■I. .- uJ
}■}■- lJ !1 : ■ ••I r-I! 1)■Yif.
■7I ' —1
\©
\ H
^ (0a ■
•- 41
■ ■ r * f47 45
&
. d33 *3 144 15 I 4526 ' 20 27 | a 2S- | 3031 13? 33 | 34 33 iap 37,3S WA.CLf
3S :AiD 4J i 4212 13 i 4, 15 16 17 18 i 19 20 21 22 22 1 24 'TTU ■
J Ci)
■■
©
I
■.
■
c UJ
■.
's' "rl ■a a@1 S} @
1 — 1
■
s
® mt m 'g -U!
]M ~\—\’T
. S ?Q_i
r-L_ I
39 §> @> @1 ^ @1 @ @! 8<L'.'J 1,
Si''7 cr5 uj(166^ 'v ■:

I a* ■
C3CO iTil
67 156^66 O
FiL
30 @1
if
54 i SJ i B2 5f J 307ff 75ea1 7S 78 77 74 | 73 72 i 71 1 70: (fl? i «7 fiJ fiS G£ l 6? SO ■ SO SBBB ‘ Sf tS'J5 34 1 iK flP i 33 i h-i P S;i CO2: i . • PS1
I i i
■%
md
■-'
Ol i*l ■ATI 4
iLj/J 25’ »
■
iU
3 ,i
4 a ■$r * * 0 '■?
.■» Jr ;- '■fjii-
a-# cr,
3341'
AVF.IV. HERNDON 4j 3
r
I
Assessor's Wap Bk. 303 - Pg. 16
County of Fresno, Calff.

FIGURE 1
Pfnedale Townslte - Plat Bk. 9. Pgs.92 & 93 Bk.
407
NOTE -Assessor's Block Numbers Stiown hi Ellipses
Assessor's Parcel Numbers Shown in Circles.lr 10 2014 Dx

Figure 2
.. • .0
fc- PA i.

VHT PINEDALE PROJECTA JB
—
UMT7Wu)
* Fort Washington Lincoln
Sch
TEAGUE —.6I ' A
27I 28 / k
ii&c
: *' I *I 0
5 fsj p ■
• •• A
I
/' .0/
/
UJ- Well SLAVONIANavel
*Pit I
J55S QI
(7
36/-<-3 50-
.t)A
* t;
si /
/,' N & 360
L
if I'350
ki
V-i V 'j’f ;
&XJ BM
i /; * 1135! NEESm
If ‘ ' 355
■na
/ Uj
a
3, <1
m] W- ~-?Y y
■■■ <r. UJ
E^SSrJo % i
7) J aTrailer
Parks
*II 0. . I
Q:

UJ
1* k.
1 '•■PV «o°° ZU li
m
UJ
S
■
•/x/V
-.. I**
a 340'33 ALLUVIAL 3523*9\
I,-. CANAL
Cy'
k£ 0
JHs... Wvt—
1 I il JL««
UJ
4l-
mLf •••-
BMi ■350-
**Project Area
347
::: >■
"Sp- 3*5 v
vl! ; Drive-in,
7//' .' Theater
f«5' •'
“ I ; -J5
;l
PLill |
. ■■
v. 11 ]LO
' 4
Fire —
•••: 3*0
:ioi. fFll If
5 ov HERNDON. .
'J,• .-r336
-J
■P*l
338r
vi: : : if'":
=1% 1(T-? sce
Tjrailer
[f| Well ( p 11 y
.
332>
H - ! :Far Well:

H
336 —<>1 • * o
Hi M-•) A Trailer
> Park
con9 UJ n iIk1? a. - mrnmSBLk
34 k
■
AVE■333*W7 .-
*336 v r
BM/
UJ
rsVas®1 U)
I ;^T7l u
4 o
HI./ 1
> - 4 . - AVE
wen. hr
336 11 A=
AVI
iuij
AVE ESC* LON
a
. <5AVE
SuTsjpt
■
Tena„,
-T"Jr Hijih Sch
Ui
"-[l
‘ ion
$ JL • ,1* •1
True North AVE
f
IVju ^
*32
^6jii**
I
RO
!|V
I
Antho \ISch
ty
H
330
-1 1s
— f
l
AVEn^G J
1 Ad
II1 M ! Robi■I 1 -J
USGS 1:24,000 Fresno North, Calif. 1965 (1981)lj
-------------raf----------------
Gibson
Sch Hoover
High Sc
k ^3 2
333LAVE
y
' Township 12 South/Range 20 East
<0AVE
N RAMONi^ VE
o
* 4
2 IS I - n -_ n. ___
4g/<*' '^gl
4 Register of Historic Places are automatically listed on the CRHR, as are State Landmarks and Points of Interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local historical resource surveys.

For the purposes of CEQA, an historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. When a project will impact a site, it needs to be determined whether the site is an historical resourc e. The criteria are set forth in Section 15064.5(a) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines, and are defined as any resource that does any of the following:

A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage;

B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;

C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or posses ses high artistic values; or

D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

In addition, the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(a) (4) states:

The fact that a resource is not listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code), or identified in an historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(j) or 5024.1.

California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5, 7051, and 7054

These sections collectively address the illegality of interference with human burial remains, as well as the disposition of Native American burials in archaeological sites. The law protects such remains from disturbance, vandalism, or inadvertent destruction, and establishes procedures to be implemented if Native American skeletal remains are discovered during construction of a project, including the treatment of remains prior to, during, and after evaluation, and reburial procedures.

California Public Resources Code Section 15064.5(e)

This law addresses the disposition of Native American burials in archaeological sites and protects such remains from disturbance, vandalism, or inadvertent destruction. The section establishes procedures to be implemented if Native American skeletal remains are discovered during construction of a project and establishes the Native American Heritage Commission as the entity responsible to resolve disputes regarding the disposition of such remains.

5 Assembly Bill 52

Assembly Bill (AB) 52 establishes a formal consultation process for California tribes as part of CEQA and equates significant impacts on tribal cultural resources with significant environmental impacts. AB 52 defines a “California Native American Tribe ” as a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the N ative American Heritage Commission. AB 52 requires formal consultation with California Native American Tribes prior to determining the level of environmental docu ment if a tribe has requested to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects. AB 52 also requires that consultation address project alternatives, mitigation measures, for significant effects, if requested by the California Native American Tribe, an d that consultation be considered concluded when either the parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, or the agency concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached. Under AB 52, such measures shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and adopted mitigation monitoring program if determined to avoid or lessen a significant impact on a tribal cultural resource.

CULTURAL SETTING

Archeology

The Central Valley region was among the first in the state to attract intensive fieldwork, and research has continued to the present day. This has resulted in a substantial accumulation of data, but the emphasis has been in the northern portion of the valley. In the early decades of the 1900s, E.J. Dawson explored numerous sites near Stockton and Lodi, later collaborating with W.E.

Schenck (Schenck and Dawson 1929). By 1933, the focus of work was directed to the Cosumnes locality, where survey and excavation were conducted by the Sacramento Junior College (Lillard and Purves 1936). Excavation data, in particular from the stratified Windmiller site (CA -SAC- 107), suggested two temporally distinct cultural traditions. Later work at other mounds by Sacramento Junior College and the University of California, Berkeley, e nabled the investigators to identify a third cultural tradition, intermediate between the previously postulated Early and Late Horizons. The three -horizon sequence, based on discrete changes in ornamental artifacts and mortuary practices, as well as on ob served differences in soils within sites (Lillard, Heizer and Fenenga 1939), was later refined by Beardsley (1954). An expanded definition of artifacts diagnostic of each time period was developed, and its application extended to parts of the central California coast. Traits held in common allow the application of this system within certain limits of time and space to other areas of prehistoric central California.

In the southern San Joaquin Valley, with the exception of Hewes’s excavation at CA-FRE-48 (the Tranquility Site), the foci of early investigations have been the old shorelines of the interior lakes; Tulare, Kern, and Buena Vista. In 1899, Dr. P. M. Jones directed fieldwork in the Buena Vista - Tulare Lake area of Kern County. Jones investigated 150 mounds and conducted trenching of several sites including CA-KER-53. In 1909, N. C. Nelson investigated prehistoric Site CA-KER- 49, which is located to the west of Buena Vista Lake. Later, four surveys and excavations were

6 conducted in the same locale under the auspices of the University of California. A compilation of these investigation results was published in 1926 by Gifford and Schenck.

As a result of this early work, an elaborate culture complex was defined for the late prehistoric period. Th is complex can be ascribed probably to the Yokuts and their direct ancestors. The material culture of this late temporal period complex included steatite vessels and beads, finely - made projectile points, pottery, shaped stone mortars, Tivela disc beads, use of asphaltum, and the presence of metates and manos. Flexed burials were the predominant interment mode. Earlier complexes underlying the late cultural expressions were represented by chipped stone crescents, large projectile points, atlatl spurs, and weights. Mortuary practices, generally thought to be related, include extended rather than flexed burial position, a situation analogous to that of the northern valley (Gifford and Schenck 1926; Lillard, Heizer, and Fenenga 1939; Moratto 1972).

Presence of “Early Man, ” although not found in direct association with extinct animals, is demonstrated by the frequency of chipped stone crescents and fluted points similar to those of the Clovis-Folsom Complex in the American Southwest. Although fluted points have been found near the shores of Tulare Lake, an area that has also produced surface finds of extinct mammal bone of Pleistocene age, the association is not substantiated by controlled excavations and remains speculative (Riddell and Olsen 1969). Most of the point colle ction had been acquired by D. Witt over a period of 30 years.

Under the direction of Wedel (1941), the Civil Works Administration, in conjunction with the Smithsonian Institution, initiated the first major excavations using stratigraphic controls.

Investigations of CA-KER-39 and CA-KER-60 as well as several smaller sites near Buena Vista Lake produced evidence of two distinct cultural entities or occupation periods. Wedel lacked methods for dating these two entities by cross-comparison of the assemblages, he tentatively stated that the early occupation at Buena Vista Lake appeared to be temporally older and less developed than the Early Horizon (Windmiller Pattern) of the Delta region. He compared this early component to the Oak Grove or Milling Stone cu lture of the Santa Barbara area (Rogers 1939).

He divided the later cultural entity into two distinct phases, both clearly distinguished from the earlier cultural phase by artifact types. Wedel (1941:144 -145) estimated that neither of these cultural periods exceeded 1500 B.P. (years Before the Present). Later, other investigators proposed far earlier ages for these early occupations, with dates ranging from 2000 to 7000 B.P. (Baumhoff and Olmstead 1963, 1964; Heizer 1964; Meighan 1959).

Later investigations in 1963 and 1964 at CA-KER-116 near Buena Vista Lake produced materials similar to Wedel’s early occupation. These materials occurred in the lower levels of the “upper deposit,” while an even deeper cultural deposit yielded materials similar to those of the San Dieguito Complex. Artifacts included a chipped stone crescent, crude point fragments, and an atlatl spur. Radiocarbon age determinations on shell from the lowest cultural levels returned a date of circa 8200 B.P. (Fredrickson and Grossman 1966, 1977; Fredrickson 1967).

Despite the previously mentioned investigations, the prehistory of the southern San Joaquin remains as yet poorly understood, without a tightly defined chronological sequence of cultural development.

7 Ethnology

Ethnographic literature is often uncertain in definition of cultural boundaries for Indian groups.

Early displacement by white intrusion resulted in population shifts to avoid conflict with the Spanish, and later with the miners and settlers. The ravages of disease and warfare decimated the native people, further weakening cultural identity. Informants were often uncertain of original territories of the various tribal groupings.

The Foothill Yokuts were members of the Penutian language family which held all of the Central Valley, San Francisco Bay Area, and the Pacific Coast from Marin County to near Point Sur. The Yokuts differed from other ethnographic groups in California as they had true tribal divisions with group names (Kroeber 1925). Each tribe spoke a particul ar dialect, common to its members, but similar enough to other Yokuts that they were mutually intelligible (Kroeber 1925).

The Foothill Yokuts were a group of about 15 named tribes who occupied the western Sierra Nevada foothills from the Fresno River to the Kern River. A further subdivision separated the groups into northern, central and southern groups. The area controlled by individual groups varied over time. There is no information to indicate that there was a village in the project vicinit y, but this does not preclude the possibility.

Trade was well developed, with mutually beneficial interchange of needed or desired goods.

Obsidian, rare in the San Joaquin Valley, was obtained by trade with Paiute and Shoshoni groups on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada, where numerous sources of this material are located, and to some extent from the Napa Valley to the north. Shell beads, obtained by the Yokuts from coastal people, and acorns, rare in the Great Basin, were among many items exported to the east by Yokuts traders (Davis 1961).

Economic subsistence was based on the acorn, with substantial dependency on gathering and processing of wild seeds and other vegetable foods. The rivers, streams, and sloughs which formed a maze within the valle y provided abundant food resources such as fish, shellfish, and turtles.

Game, wild fowl, and small mammals were trapped and hunted to provide protein augmentation of the diet. In general, the eastern portion of the San Joaquin Valley provided a lush environment of varied food resources, with the estimated large population centers reflecting this abundance (Cook 1955; Baumhoff 1963).

Settlements were oriented along the water ways, with their village sites normally placed adjacent to these features for th eir nearby water and food resources. House structures varied in size and shape (Latta 1949; Kroeber 1925). The housepit depressions ranged in diameter from between 3 to 18 meters.

Latta (1949:99) reported that a village of 200 to 300 Yokuts might have f our or five large houses that were used for ten or twelve years or until a family member died, at which time the Indians burned the house in which the death had occurred. If a sick or aged person died outside the dwelling, the family did not burn the house. When a Northern Yokuts died, his body was cremated or buried in a flexed position. Southern tribes normally buried their dead, although they did

8 cremate shamans, persons who died away from their village and, among the Tachi, persons of great importance.

The Yokuts experienced severe depopulation after contact with the Spanish and subsequent explores. The most devastating impacts of the Spanish colonization effort were not the result of military conflicts, but came from Old World diseases newly introduced to the native people.

Historical Context

Early Explorations

The early recorded inhabitants of the region were members of the Yokuts tribe. Although the Spanish missions were established closer to the Pacific coast between 1769 and 1817, the general project area was first visited in the early 1800s by Spanish explorers, who visited the San Joaquin Valley with three goals: to search for runaway neophytes from the missions in the coastal regions, to punish the Indian raiders, and to select sites for new missions. In 1806, a group led by Gabriel Moraga and Father Pedro Muñoz, left Mission San Juan Bautista heading north to about the Mokelumne River. They then turned south, and travelled along the edge of the mountains crossing the San Joaquin River and passing through Tejon Pass, arriving at Mission San Fernando. In 1815, José Dolores Pico marched an expedition group from Monterey into the region. Following the San Joaquin River, he passed through the area in search of runaways, traveling as far south as the Kern River. The expedition returned to the starting point in Monterey with nine prisoners and a number of horses.

After control of California passed from Spain to Mexico in 1822, Mexican explorations into the interior continued, with José Dolores Pico conducting a major expedition along the San Joaquin River in 1825 -1826. This expedition was considered successful in that some neophytes were captured, hostile Indians killed, some of the tribal groups intimidated, and some stolen horse s recovered. In 1828, Sebastián Rodríguez led a similar expedition into the same region. His expedition captured a number of neophytes as well as some of the stolen horses, an item that had become an important dietary staple for the Indian tribes in the S an Joaquin Valley region (Beck and Haase 1974).

The expeditions did not leave physical evidence, but there were definitely effects to the Native American populations. Causing even more of an effect on the native population were the diseases brought in to the Native populations of the Central Valley in the early 1830s.

Ranchos

In Fresno County, there was only one early land grant, a rancho along the current southern border of the county: Laguna de Tache. The era of the Spanish and Mexican land grants did not directly affect the project area.

9 Project Area History

The early use of land in the region was for cultivation of wheat. Improvements such as the development of the railroad, allow ed marketing of more perishable crops, and irrigation canals, providing a steady source of water year-round, also encouraged the growth of crops such as grapes.

The fate of Japanese Issei and their children was sealed by the advent of World War II. With unjustified fears about the loyalty of the immigrant Japanese and their American -born children, after Pearl Harbor in December 1941, President Roosevelt ordered the internment of the families through Executive Order 9066. Beginning in March of 1942, Japanese families including American citizens, were taken to Pinedale Assembly Center about a half mile to the west of the project area. Families were then sent on to various camps and interned for the remainder of the war, including the Colorado River camp of Pos ton. The camp has been established at the former site of a lumber mill, utilizing former millworker housing.

RESEARCH

A record search was conducted for the project area through the Southern San Joaquin Valley Archaeological Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System on February 15, 2022 (RS#22-054, Appendix 2). A small part of the eastern end of the project area had been surveyed by Denise O’Connor in 1980 (Report #FR-00577), with negative findings. One other survey has been conducted in the project vicinity (FR-00384).

No sites have been previously recorded in or near the project area.

FIELD ASSESSMENT

Michael Lawson conducted a field survey of the project area on February 22, 2022, using complete inspection (Figure 3).

The survey area is surrounded by surface streets in a residential and commercial area. Most of the parcel is empty, but two residences are located on the west side. The land is flat, possibly graded at some time. Elevation is close to that of adjoining sidewalks. The lot appears to have been used for parking at one time.

Introduced grass and ground cover grow in patches throughout the survey area but are more densely near the west side. Ornamental trees and bushes grow near the residences.

The property was surveyed on foot using parallel transects no more than two meters apart. Closer inspection occurred in areas where ground disturbance had occurred, such as walking trails or animal activity.

Figure 3
w "’i----------' -y c. p a.-k.k i <
-
s<.0*L m£. WELL*__ i.-

VHT PINEDALE PROJECT(A -
ft Fort Washington Lincoln
Sch
TEAGUE —
, i( I ffV / I \A
I Survey Coverage f
3/. -----------------u w ’
27I 356
u\ x—\ I\ IVvS / f) J S
I/ >\ \ ••• '\
oJ? J
L#
uj- Well SLAVONIAN \Z'avel
*Pit I
J55S QI .
(7
36/
.t
€
1 a
L
360
*e o *= riL 350
vx
r- I /
BM
// '351 NEESm
it—_
i*tr------- 35S
Uj
?-i
$
If— <x
i
m] W- £ UJ
E^SSrJo % i
'> )r&m'
7) J <0
Trailer
Parks S .

Q: i
UJk
■
»o°°° 2li.
m
UJ% ■ 0
<2 345 0-"33 ALLUVIAL • • 352>■349
TT■<
CANALI,-. / k£ osr
S L.flv *
l LM ■350■' svtir® *
Project Area
Ij 347
- 3^5 '
B/. ; Drive-in,
Theater
*rgjjgrai •■ -
“i
Wj
r0£
■\
1340 1
ii"i ■ill :2^ f
Vi? FljrelJ
j, ,
Fll If

5.ill U ■
___ T~^
' HE^RNDON..
■ ^----a____f___ • .-r _336•111
-±L
Complete, Intensive Survey Coverage:
■ *>..*
ijrailir PJrk
_ -Well ( .ii Ml t J3S332
I Wellrf : 336
: "!
: : .o
11 Jl-•) Trailer con9 UJ
&I? - u.
£2334 K
AVE*333 ^
^•4nr ■ ■ VT BM 336
- ' UJ UJ
*
V
T U)
I ; y.u—4 o
□.i|/ I
> . - AVE
Well ;
\
AVE
luij:r

AVE ESCA LON
o
. Qj
SuTsjpl
■; iTena_,
-T"Jr Hi^h Sch
uj
k-[i
l ion
■U 4*1 •
True North AVEbullA/id "I ; • [t III^6jii**
I
I*RD
U=j .v
la 1Antho CO\Ic:;s»j
jNULj ^
Sch
ty ;■330

1. j3 1
□a
M/lfG j
-
A
1 II1 M ! Robi■1
USGS 1:24,000 Fresno North. Calif. 1965 (1981)N
1 -J
Gibson
Sch Hoover
High Sc
k ^3 2
T "TT—ui-»',....«u ;i--
ttH •' itjn
333>4VE>4
_ ..' Township 12 South/Range 20 East
■ - - - -~l Tl ~
<oAVE
□^AA//?AMO/s/|J^ VE
O
L_£
2“
g/<*' '^gl_ ’O' -Jlflk_ _iL-
4 11
Visibility was generally very good. Most of the lot is clear of vegetation and only lightly covered in imported gravel. Small fragments of modern refuse are scattered though out the lot.

Soils are light brown sandy loam with heavy gravel content. The gravel was likely imported and mixed with the native soil. Stone material identified as local includes quartzite, granitic, and meta volcanic varieties. Cobbles and large pebbles are present.

There is no surface evidence of prehistoric period cultural resources within the project area.

Two buildings are present that are more than 50 years in age. Each is recorded and evaluated for significance under the criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources.

RESOURCE DESCRIPTIONS

49 West Fir Street, Fresno

The property consists of a single-family home and detached garage located on a small, narrow lot.

The single-family residence is single story, rectangular shaped with a front gable roof. Small, covered porches are located along the north, east, and south facing fa çades. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are coated with stucco. Windows are modern aluminum and look to be replacements.

The detached garage is single story, rectangular shape with a front gable roof covered with asphalt shingles. The sides are coated with stucco. A garage door is located along the north facing façade.

Three double sash windows are located along the east and south facing facades.

The home was constructed in 1945 according to county building records. Stylistically it fits within the Minimal Traditional Style, popular between 1935-1950 (McAlester 2017:586-595). The front- gabled roof subtype is less common than other subtypes of Minimal Traditional Style homes, but otherwise this residence displays the typical stylistic elements of the style.

66 West Beechwood Avenue, Fresno

The property has a single -family home with detached garage located on a small nar row lot. The residence is singe story, irregular shape with a hipped roof. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are covered with stucco, except for the south facing façade that has partial decorative brick siding. Windows are modern aluminum and look to be replacements.

The detached garage is single story with a hipped roof covered with asphalt shingles. The sides are covered with stucco.

12 The home was constructed in 1961 according to county building records. Stylistically it fits within the Minimal Traditional Style, popular between 1935 -1950 (McAlester 2017:586 -595). The hipped roof subtype is less common than other subtypes of Minimal Traditional Style homes, but otherwise this residence displays the typical stylistic elements of the style.

RESOURCE EVALUATIONS

49 West Fir Street, Fresno

Under CRHR criterion A, the site must “be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage.” The residence and detached garage do not appear to be associated with any specific, significant contribution.

For a property to be eligible under Criterion B of the CRHR, the features must be associated with persons important in the past. There is no evidence to suggest that this property was ever associated with a significant person in our past.

For CRHR Criterion C, the resource must embody “the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work o f an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.” Minimal Traditional Style homes represented the one of the most economical to build residential unit layouts available and was widely advertised as such during the 1930s and 1940s (Mc Alester 2017:587). The residence at 49 West Fir Avenue is a slightly less typical, but still very common, example of this widely built subtype.

For Criterion D , there were no associated archeological deposits observed during the field inspection and recordation and it is unlikely given the degree of ground disturbance surrounding the buildings that a buried, undiscovered deposit would be present.

We conclude that this residence and detached garage does not meet the threshold under criteria A - D of the CRHR and is not a historical resource.

66 West Beechwood Avenue, Fresno

Under CRHR criterion A, the site must “be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage.” The residence and detached garage do not appear to be associated with any specific, significant contribution.

For a property to be eligible under Criterion B of the CRHR, the features must be associated with persons important in the past. There is n o evidence to suggest that this property was ever associated with a significant person in our past.

For CRHR Criterion C, the resource must embody “the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.” Minimal Traditional Style homes represented the one of the most

13 economical to build residential unit layouts available and was widely advertised as such during the 1930s and 1940s (McAlester 2017:587). The residence located at 66 West Beechwood Avenue is a slightly less typical, but still very common, example of this widely built subtype.

For Criterion D , there were no associated archeological deposits observed during the field inspection and recordation and it is unlikely given the degree of ground disturbance surrounding the buildings that a buried, undiscovered deposit would be present.

We conclude that this residence and detached garage does not meet the threshold under criteria A - D of the CRHR and is not a historical resource.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The residences are not significant resources, and will be recorded in the permanent record with submittal to the Information Center.

Although no prehistoric sites were found during the survey, there is a slight possibility that a site may exist and be tot ally obscured by vegetation, fill, or other historic activities, leaving no surface evidence. Should artifacts or unusual amounts of stone, bone, or shell be uncovered during construction activities, an archeologist should be consulted for on-the-spot evaluation of the finding.

Discovery of Human Remains

In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the Fresno County Coroner has determined that the remains are not subject to any provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains.

If the Fresno County Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the Coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Nat ive American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).

After notification, the NAHC will follow the procedures outlined in Pub lic Resources Code Section 5097.98, that include notification of most likely descendants (MLDs), and recommendations for treatment of the remains. The MLDs will have 24 hours after notification by the NAHC to make their recommendations (PRC Section 5097.98).

14 REFERENCES

Baumhoff, Martin A.
1963 Ecological Determinants of Aboriginal California Populations. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 49(2): 155-236.

Berkeley.

Baumhoff, Martin A., and David Olmsted
1963 Radiocarbon support for Glottochronology. American Anthropologist 65(2): 278- 284.

1964 Notes on Palaihnihan culture history: glottochronology and archaeology. Studies in California linguistics, edited by William Bright, pp. 1-12. University of California Publications in Linguistics 34. Berkeley.

Beardsley, Richard K.
1954 Temporal and Areal Relationships in Central California Archeology (parts 1 and 2). University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 24, 25. Berkeley.

Beck, Warren A. and Ynez D. Haase
1974 Historical Atlas of California. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

Clough, Charles W. and William B. Secrest, Jr.
1984 Fresno County—The Pioneer Years: From the Beginning to 1900. Panorama West Books, Fresno.

Cook, Sherburne F.
1960 Colonial expeditions to the interior of California: Central Valley 1800-1820.

University of California Anthropological Records 16(6): 239-292. Berkeley.

1955a The Aboriginal Populations of the San Joaquin Valley, California. University of California Press Anthropological Records 16(2). Berkeley.

1955b The epidemic of 1830 -33 in California and Oregon. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 43(3): 303-326. Berkeley.

Davis, James T.
1961 Trade Routes and Economic Exchange among the Indians of California.

University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 54:1-71. Berkeley.

Elliott, Wallace W.
1882 History of Fresno County, California with Illustrations. Wallace W. Elliott & Company, Publishers, San Francisco.

15 Fickewirth, Alvin A.
1992 California Railroads. Golden West Books. San Marino, CA.

Fredrickson, David A.
1967 Additional C-14 dates for water resources investigations at Buena Vista Lake.

Society for California Archaeology Newsletter 1(5).

Frickstad, Walter
1955 A Century of California Post Offices. Pacific Rotapress Printing Company, Oakland.

Fredrickson, David A., and J. Grossman
1966 Radiocarbon Dating of an Early Site at Buena Vista Lake, California. Paper read before the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Reno.

1977 A San Dieguito Component at Buena Vista Lake, Califo rnia. The Journal of California Anthropology 4(2): 173-190.

Gates, Paul W.
1991 Land and Law in California: Essays on Land Policies. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

Gifford, E. W., and W. E. Schenck
1926 Archaeology of the Southern San Joaquin Valley, California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 23, No. 1.

Gudde, Erwin
1969 California Place Names. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Harvey Sr., William
1907 Atlas of Fresno County, CA. William Harvey, Fresno.

Hayes, Derek
2007 Historical Atlas of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Hofsommer, Don L.
1986 The Southern Pacific, 1901-1985. Texas A &M University Press, College Station.

Hoover, Mildred, Hero E. Rensch, Ethel G. Rensch (William N. Abeloe, editor) 1970 Historic Spots in California (Third Edition). Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Kroeber, Alfred L.
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78.

Washington, D.C.

16 Latta, Franklin F.
1949 Handbook of the Yokuts Indians. Bear State Books, Oildale, California.

Lewis Publishing Company
1892 A Memorial and Biographical History of the Counties of Fresno, Tulare and Kern. California. Chicago: The Lewis Publishing Company.

Lillard, Jeremiah B., Robert F. Heizer and Franklin Fenenga 1939 An Introduction to the Archaeology of Central California. Sacramento Junior College, Department of Anthropology Bulletin 2. Sacramento.

Lillard, Jeremiah B. and William K. Purves
1936 The Archeology of the Deer Creek-Cosumnes Area, Sacramento County, California. Sacramento Junior College, Department of Anthropology Bulletin 1.

McAlester, Virginia Savage
2017 A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

Meighan, Clement W.
1959 California Cultures and the Concept of an Archaic Stage. American Antiquity 24(3): 289-318.

Moratto, Michael J.
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, Inc., New York.

Progressive Map Service
1923 Progressive Atlas of Fresno County. Progressive Map Service, Fresno.

Riddell, Francis A. and William H. Olsen
1969 An Early Man Site in the San Joaquin Valley, California. American Antiquity 34(2): 121-131. Washington, D.C.

Rogers, Malcolm J.
1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers 3. San Diego.

Schenck, W. Egbert and Elmer Dawson
1929 Archaeology of the Northern San Joaquin Valley. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 25(4): 289-413. Berkeley.

Smith, Wallace
1960 Garden of the Sun. Eighth edition. Privately printed.

17 Thompson, Thomas H.
1891 Official Historical Atlas Map of Fresno County . Thomas H. Thompson, Tulare, California.

Vandor, Paul E.
1919 History of Fresno County, California. Historic Record Company, Los Angeles.

Varner, Dudley
2005 A Cultural Resources Study of the Riverfront Ventures Property in the City of Fresno, Fresno County, California. On file, South San Joaquin Valley Information Center (#FR-2112).

Wedel, Waldo R.
1941 Archaeological Investigations at Buena Vista Lake, Kern County, California.

Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 130. Washington, D.C.

Winchell, Lilbourne Alsip
1933 History of Fresno County and the San Joaquin Valley. Fresno: A. H. Cawston.

Publisher.

18 APPENDIX 1

Resumes

19 PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC.

RESUME

MELINDA A. PEAK January 2022
Senior Historian/Archeologist
3941 Park Drive, Suite 20 #329
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
(916) 939-2405

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Ms. Peak has served as the principal investigator on a wide range of prehistoric and historic excavations throughout California. She has directed laboratory analyses of archeological materials, including the historic period. She has also conducted a wide variety of cultural resource assessments in California, including documentary research, field survey, Native American consultation and report preparation.

In addition, Ms. Peak has developed a second field of expertise in applied history, specializing in site- specific research for historic period resources. She is a registered professional historian and has completed a number of historical research projects for a wide variety of site types.

Through her education and experience, Ms. Peak me ets the Secretary of Interior Standards for historian, architectural historian, prehistoric archeologist and historic archeologist.

EDUCATION

M.A. - History - California State University, Sacramento, 1989 Thesis: The Bellevue Mine: A Historical Resources Management Site Study in Plumas and Sierra Counties, California
B.A. - Anthropology - University of California, Berkeley

PROJECTS

In recent months, Ms. Peak has completed several determinations of eligibility and effect documents in coordination with the Corps of Engineers for projects requiring federal permits, assessing the eligibility of a number of sites for the National Register of Historic Places.

She has also completed historical research projects on a wide variety of topics for a number of projects including the development of navigation and landings on the Napa River, wineries, farmhouses dating to the 1860s, bridges, an early roadhouse, Folsom Dam and a section of an electric railway line.

In recent years, Ms. Peak has prepared a number of cultural resource overviews and predictive models for blocks of land proposed for future development for general and specific plans. She has been able to direct a number of surveys of these areas, allowing the model to be tested.

20 She served as principal investigator for the multi-phase Twelve Bridges Golf Club project in Placer County. She served as liaison with the various agencies, helped prepare the historic properties treatment plan, managed the various phases of test and data recovery excavations, and completed the final report on the analysis of the test phase excavations of a number of prehistoric sites. She is currently involved as the principal investigator for the Teichert Quarry project adjacent to Twelve Bridges in the City of Rocklin, coordinating contacts with Native Americans, the Corps of Engineers and the Office of Historic Preservation.

Ms. Peak has served as project manager for a number of major survey and excavation projects in recent years, including the many surveys and site definition excavations for the 172-mile-long Pacific Pipeline proposed for construction in Santa Barbara, Ventura and Los Angeles counties. She also completed an archival study in the City of Los Angeles for the project. She also served as principal investigator for a major coaxial cable removal project for AT&T.

Additionally, she completed a number of small surveys, served as a construction monitor at several urban sites, and conducted emergency recovery excavations for sites found during monitoring. She has directed the excavations of several historic complexes in Sacramento, Placer and El Dorado Counties.

Ms. Peak is the author of a chapter and two sections of a published history (1999) of Sacramento County, Sacramento: Gold Rush Legacy, Metropolitan Legacy. She served as the consultant for a children’s book on California, published by Capstone Press in 2003 in the Land of Liberty series.

21 PEAK & ASSOCIATES, INC.

RESUME

MICHAEL LAWSON January 2022
Archeological Specialist
3941 Park Drive, Suite 20-329
El Dorado Hills, CA 95672
(916) 939-2405

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Mr. Lawson has compiled an excellent record of supervision of excavation and survey projects for both the public and private sectors over the past twenty-three years. He has conducted a number of surveys throughout northern and central California, as well as serving as an archeological technician and crew chief for a number of excavation projects.

EDUCATION
B.A. - Anthropology - California State University, Sacramento

Special Course: Comparative Osteology. University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Forensic Anthropology Center. January 2018.

Intensive lab and outdoor study with human example from outdoor research facility, including typical and non-metric examples, compared with fifty non-human species most commonly confused with human remains. Outdoor research facility “The Body Farm” study included survey, photography, collection and identification of faunal and human bone fragments, with a Power Point presentation discussing finds.

EXPERIENCE
• Extensive monitoring of open space, streets and project development areas for prehistoric period and historic period resources. Areas monitored include Sutter Street in Folsom; Mud Creek Archeological District in Chico; Camp Roberts, San Luis Obispo County; Avila Beach, San Luis Obispo County; Edgewood Golf Course, South Lake Tahoe; Davis Water Project, Davis; Star Bend levee section, Sutter County; Feather River levees, Sutter County; Bodega Bay, Sonoma County; San Jose BART line extension, Santa Clara County; and numerous sites for PG&E in San Francisco.
• Over twenty years of experience working in CRM, volunteer, and academic settings in California historic, proto-historic, and prehistoric archaeology. • Expertise in pedestrian survey, ex cavation, feature (including burial) exposure, laboratory techniques, research. Field positions include crew chief and lead technician.

22 APPENDIX 2

Record Search

2/15/2022

Robert Gerry
Peak & Associates, Inc.
3941 Park Drive, Suite 30-329
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

Re: 49 West Fir Properties
Records Search File No.: 22-054

The Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Fresno North USGS 7.5’ quad . The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and the 0.25 mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☒ custom GIS maps ☐ GIS data

Resources within project area: None
Resources within 0.25 mile radius: None
Reports within project area: FR-00577
Reports within 0.25 mile radius: FR-00384
Note:

Resource Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed ☐ not available Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed ☐ not available Note: Only the Title Page, Table of Contents, & Executive Summary of TU-00102 was included.

OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Note: P-15-007760 is not listed in the BERD. The 2013 HPD page was included for this resource. w.
,. •'> n' Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center California State University, Bakersfield
Mail Stop: 72 DOB
9001 Stockdale Highway
Bakersfield, California 93311-1022
(661) 654-2289
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.csub.edu/ssjvic
California
Historical
Resources
_I_n formation
_S y stem
Fresno
Kern
Kings
Madera
Tulare
A
O
. •

Caltrans Bridge Survey: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://dot.ca.gov/programs/environmental-analysis/cultural-studies/california-historical-bridges-tunnels Ethnographic Information: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Literature: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/
Local Inventories: Not available at SSJVIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx#searchTabIndex=0&searchByTypeIndex=1 and/or http://www.oac.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb8489p15p;developer=local;style=oac4;doc.view=items Shipwreck Inventory: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://www.slc.ca.gov/shipwrecks/

Soil Survey Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as s oon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of , or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and R ecreation, S tate Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submi tted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. I nvoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,

Celeste M. Thomson
Coordinator

FR-00577
FR-00384
May depict confidential cultural resource locations.

Do not distribute.

Ü
0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles
0 0.15 0.30.075 Kilometers
SSJV Information Center Record Search 22-054
Requester: Robert Gerry, Peak & Associates, Inc.

Project Name: 49 West Fir Properties
USGS 7.5' Quad(s): Fresno North
County: Fresno
Project Area
Record Search radius
^7 —
T
;❖ >>>>>>>!<* Sii c
■
p&1
*1 vv°/\ / o
1 V
. «t>°° ,
■
J U) . W’W
♦Xv
Xw►♦Xv>!♦>!<
..O
344
jf
.4*0(
oW_. 'If nr
/■ ■
sr f
I
£!
I
H-# ___
Pi
j
;. j V
=wMINAR&TS AVE
z 5-i
T
sr„ SPWCE ,,-
■BnMalefi------511---75l|iO :/y i . Jy JL
u
V
O
<Q
s.
7J ST
2=
¥i
a
*•
l?
co
□
\ ^jar-.iaE.jUft rfc'i-4;
34J • 90
1 I• ■*
M /
1 fF
p
&r • *
t
: -r

4. f*
V^v,
m
Ml
m n Wel\i, « ■
2 :
\/ 33 6
0 c■
V
zr n
yp
00 t■ P
0 Trup✓
i *
j/
& Pao
3 ii4 K00 .

SIERRA 333 ^
>5vJ! •• •BM >336 • • ■
/ rc
UJ H
0 J .11
I ;ii
□□
J I I
I-----1----1----1----1----1----1----1----1
J I L
26 APPENDIX 3

DPR 523 Records for Buildings

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 8 ends

P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location:  Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County: Fresno and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Fresno North, Calif. Date: 1965 (1981) T 12S; R 20E; SW ¼ of SE ¼ of Sec 33; M.D.B.M. c. Address: 49 West Fir Street City: Fresno Zip: 93650-1311 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: 342 Feet (estimate). The residence is located at 49 West Fir Street in the community of Pinedale.

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The property consists of a single-family home and detached garage located on a small, narrow lot. The single-family residence is single story, rectangular shaped with a front gable roof. Small, covered porches are located along the north, east, and south facing facades. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles and the sides are coated with stucco. Windows are modern aluminum and look to be replacements.

The detached garage is single story, rectangular shape with a front gable roof covered with asphalt shingles. The sides are coated with stucco. A garage door is located along the north facing façade. Three double sash windows are located along the east and south facing facades.

The home was constructed in 1945 according to county building records. Stylistically it fits within the Minimal Traditional Style, popular between 1935-1950 (McAlester 2017:586-595). The front-gabled roof subtype is less common than other subtypes of Minimal Traditional Style homes, but otherwise this residence displays the typical stylistic elements of the style.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 - Singe family property *P4. Resources Present: X Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
date, accession #) View looking
south of the north facing façade of
the residence. 2/28/22. Acc. #
2022IMG5820
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: X Historic
Prehistoric Both
The home was constructed in 1945
according to assessor’s records.
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown
*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,
and address) Michael Lawson, Peak &
Associates, Inc., 3941 Park Drive, Suite
20-329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

*P9. Date Recorded: 2/28/22
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Complete, intensive.

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey
report and other sources, or enter
"none.") Cultural Resource Assessment
for the V alley Health Team Project Area,
Pinedale, County of Fresno, California

*Attachments: NONE X Location Map X Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet X Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Stat ion Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

■V.
•i ^
Jpt:

T
■T
?Y .
*3
| !■%
It1.'\
■■
ii.*■V T*1
J.T " T
izriaiaL
LfJlnFL li
agji m■^rp.
• g.

E
»'
i'4? uUtFi
49 A ,
_~
6,k
■ - —-i
7 * .LlL.vrwj^j'»i*mamir.

DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 8 ends

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 49 West Fir Street, Fresno B1. Historic Name:

B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single family residence B4. Present Use: Single family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) The residence was built in 1945 according to assessor’s records.
*B7. Moved? X No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Detached garage

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential architecture Area: Central California Period of Significance: 1900-1972 Property Type: Single family residence Applicable Criteria: A - D (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Under CRHR criterion A, the site must “be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the bro ad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage.” Th e residence and detached garage do not appear to be associated with any specific, significant contribution.

For a property to be eligible under Criterion B of the CRHR, the features must be as sociated with persons important in the past.

There is no evidence to suggest that this property was ever associated with a significant person in our past.

For CRHR Criterion C, the resource must embody “the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, r egion, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.” Minimal Traditional Style homes represented the one of the most economical to build residential unit layouts available and wa s widely advertised as such during the 1930s and 194 0s (McAlester 2017:587). The residence at 49 West Fir Street is a slightly less typical, but still very common, example of this widely built subtype.

For Criterion D. there were no associated arc heological deposits observed during the field inspec tion and recordation and it is unlikely given the degree of ground disturbance surrounding the buildings that a buried, undiscovered deposit would be present.

We conclude that this residence and detached garage does not meet the threshold under criteria A - D of the CRHR and is not a historical resource.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)

*B12. References: McAlester, Virginia Savage , 2017 A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Melinda Peak

*Date of Evaluation: February, 2022
(This space reserved for official comments.)

49 WEST FIR STREET, FRESNO
Residence
j
.
: iV^J
V _ *1-
1 m Garage
r ”
A v., • • 4 '-
if- »
; -
IScaleITrue North RlV*
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 8 ends

*Recorded by: Michael Lawson *Date: 2/28/22 X Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information

A) View looking southwest of the east facing facade of the residence. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5821

B) View looking southeast of the partial north (left) and west facing facades of the residence. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5822 '! v m ■iim fcTrtAi!:V >Tyifc.--ai
■.
f-.
f v* i I
■ iy.v> ' * 'V f v ■L. ! ?»
Cs^jIV(
W
••T|
■
: rW"iG' >
m
jt
vX
■ ■ i' ■.
■ J
«
■>
'i
i ;:i(i
Jl
■'•V /Iff !M;;
ai x- ■ J'. ¥•
2?
■i
ip
is: lP ii
•V 1
j
fi
1 /,Iff
Site v
t K
y i■-■
/' j;•' 'igtf ....;.»•
rd
r4 ii
|KS^
*5
i _) L
J
a MU0#:-
*uxn
1 '’f
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 4 of 8 ends

*Recorded by: Michael Lawson *Date: 2/28/22 X Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information

C) View looking north, northwest of the west (left) and south facing facades of the residence. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5823

D) View looking north with the detached garage (left), south facade of the residence (center). 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5828 / /
/V i
k
t-
A'
III
J
lit
!
v
tjM /
, i
f;Vi v_^
r-
mi ri1
fSnjl
r'*
‘-t_ ; - . v
-
i|
RtS HBs
V p-, i
!--k
■-
SI r
Kl
Ji Jri'[&
s
-h "L
2^
til jA-• mJSSt '33-»«V
r :.•<!*. f“ *■£•' :V";
L- 1 ii^TjTffirrM
!yr?T’-■ *’
Vv.
ft:
' ■ 'I.

Si •..*2®r^w
^ ; ■ £*X; TrfxSi r1''-■
P-. ■
m. '."tf f
stSE'
Jp
•••.'. •'■■flj; •-- ."J IV'ti ■Ar
■’.’r
- ■ MMI
y 4.* *>•
,-..- <'*> s&
■ i-kii^r
v,^,. ■Vi
,-*/•. Hvar*.

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 5 of 8 ends

*Recorded by: Michael Lawson *Date: 2/28/22 X Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information

E) View looking south of the north facing façade of the detached garage. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5824

F) View looking west of the east acing façade of the detached garage. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5825 1 «JSL,
SB
1 T'i' <
— 1
£tt! M
=ss
;-‘-JL1Ti
li
[t j
I
L
■. .--1
l-jmXXp*> j> v M • .
■fck,- ..a ' u
’ y-^i- ■;i:'v jjg
PK§i
'L.
' ^ -
■/>, _ v' JLi ,'
f. .' - ...:• ' •- ■4^. ,u
Hm
• fr:.
r‘ ' -
■h‘- ! ;' •-.'£C?J
il*
t, "* L:
•.
-i
H t
SHKs! •
>, ■
.4,.' ; .

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 6 of 8 ends

*Recorded by: Michael Lawson *Date: 2/28/22 X Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information

G) View looking north of the south facing façade of the detached garage. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG5827 >
I
% I
fm
f i i
L
*
A i
rL- - ■
U
'■ 1 I/) f
v.*
Y r >'■ : i
v+ dV
■- v
vr:^,>J.','Vi
* ■'
1 '(ft L 3
■*
*
*
■ , •11'. „ l * |■
i ■,
k-i ■j'lti, I■
.> ! j*.j.v Elg
■ \
?#***
■Vr :L;
Of*
■1. "J
■ I.p■l -
l y? T .-i.M
Efif.
*
Ia r?
p’
1 <1 1 ■j
■
■i,
p i • ^ f { 7pJv v
ji ■
.YiVi1
VJ
mff
■|S
JV' i. H
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
SKETCH MAP Trinomial

Page 7 of 8 ends

*Drawn By: Neal Neuenschwander *Date 2/28/22
DPR 523K (1/95) *Required information

t i
49 WEST FIR STREET, FRESNO
Jr
Residence I
ar
r*
1 !*
—
m
■
**
4 »
'
Ai
' i
v
' ' /
i's
I k rr
> r#^j
- «
X
*T
'I
f
True North
Fix
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
SKETCH MAP Trinomial

Page 7 of 8 ends

*Drawn By: Neal Neuenschwander *Date 2/28/22
DPR 523K (1/95) *Required information

t i
49 WEST FIR STREET, FRESNO
Jr
Residence I
ar
r*
1 !*
—
m
■
**
4 »
'
Ai
' i
v
' ' /
i's
I k rr
> r#^j
- «
X
*T
'I
f
True North
Fix
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 6 ends

P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location:  Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County: Fresno and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Fresno North, Calif. Date: 1965 (1981) T 12S ; R 20E; SW ¼ of SW¼ of Sec 33; M.D.B.M. c. Address: 66 Beechwood Avenue City: Fresno Zip:93650-1311 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: 340 Feet (estimate). The residence is located at 66 West Beechwood Avenue in the community of Pinedale.

*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The property has a single-family home with detached garage located on a small narrow lot. The residence is singe story, irregular shape with a hipped roof. The roof is covered with asphalt shingle s and the sides are covered with stucco, except for the south facing façade that has partial decorative brick siding. Win dows are modern aluminum and look to be replacements.

The detached garage is single story with a hipped roof covered with asphalt shingles. The sides are covered with stucco.

The home was constructed in 1961 according to county building records. Stylis tically it fits within the Minimal Traditional Style, popular between 1935-1950 (McAlester 2017:586-595). The hipped roof subtype is less common than other subtypes of Minimal Traditional Style homes, but otherwise this residence displays the typical styl istic elements of the style.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 – Single family property *P4. Resources Present: X Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
date, accession #) View looking
north of the south facing facades of
the detached garage (left), residence
(center). 2/28/22. Acc.
#2022IMG2crop

*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: X Historic
Prehistoric Both
The residence was constructed in
1961 according to assessor’s
records.
*P7. Owner and Address:

Unknown
*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,
and address) Michael Lawson, Peak &
Associates, Inc., 3941 Park Drive, Suite
20-329, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
*P9. Date Recorded: 2/28/22
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Complete, intensive.

*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") Cultural Resource Assessment for the V alley Health Team Project Area, Pinedale, County of Fresno, California

*Attachments: NONE X Location Map X Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet X Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Featur e Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information

T
l
an“Jr 4t
r
J
*\ '*.

H
■-'
?53WP
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 6 ends

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 66 West Beechwood Avenue, Fresno B1. Historic Name:

B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single family residence B4. Present Use: Single family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) The residence was built in 1961 according to assessor’s records.
*B7. Moved? X No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Detached garage
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential architecture Area: Central Califronia Period of Significance: 1900-1972 Property Type: Single family residence Applicable Criteria: A-D (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Under CRHR criterion A, the site must “be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the bro ad patterns of California's history and cultural h eritage.” Th e residence and detached garage does not appear to be associated with any specific, significant contribution.

For a property to be eligible under Criterion B of the CRHR, the features must be associated with persons important in the past.

There is no evidence to suggest that this property was ever associated with a significant person in our past.

For CRHR Criterion C, the resource must embody “the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values.” Minimal Traditional Style homes represented the one of the most economical to build residential unit layouts available and was widely advertised as such during the 1930s and 1940s (McAlester 2017:587). The residence located at 66 West Beechw ood Avenue is a slightly less typical, but still very common, example of this widely built subtype.

For Criterion D. there were no associated archeological deposits observed dur ing the field inspection and recordation and it is unlikely given the degree of ground disturbance surrounding the buildings that a buried, undiscovered deposit would be present.

We conclude that this residence and detached garage does not meet the thresh old under criteria a - d of the CRHR and is not a historical resource.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes)

*B12. Reference s: McAlester, Virginia Savage , 2017 A Field Guide to American Houses. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

B13. Remarks:

*B14. Evaluator: Melinda Peak

*Date of Evaluation: February, 2022
(This space reserved for official comments.)

||6WEST BEECHWOOD AVENUE, FRESNO
L
j
|■p;
>
v
Residence- Garaget=%v
*—
’ n
*
'«
1 4 *"
<*
J
* OV-
ScaleTrue North I
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 6 ends

*Recorded by: Michael Lawson *Date: 2/28/22 X Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information

A) View looking northest of the west and south facades of the residence, garage to the left. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG1crop

B) View looking north of the south facing façades of the garage (left), residence. 2/28/22. Acc. 2022IMG2crop : ”
•v
am fcpPji l
jT 4
k
n ■till
fiU T< rvY/ffffiI
m 9ns
n- i
&
w* « > ♦ < .♦ .
, V..

K< »■* >55 *• ♦
■**e : ift£7zz ♦ fi ■'.
g
■:£>'
TyBpyi «al •■' _
■ —
---—--- -
5f-r a%afe.
iB Iki:«^a
HH
im
T-..1
t:*»
'!;
‘ V- ,
mte?:\
V-*i
i fir
i
w-rs-r- *!SS
[X
»fW
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 4 of 6 ends

*Recorded by: Michael Lawson *Date: 2/28/22 X Continuation  Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information

C) View looking north, northwest of the south and east facing facades of the residence. 2/28/22. Acc. #2022IMG4crop

D) View looking northwest of the south and east facing façades of the residence. 2/28/22. Acc. 2022IMG5crop t
M
V-
lD
«*
1- "
m 4V;
;IP»V1
« 'r ,,
f
’
": 7- -V _ '
1 Mf T
T**0?.p
■if.

II
jS
eN>
.. i
v-
jjtijv -
J:Li
a*
m. 1
7^
T* *-
r3c»*-'
-i*
*G3SgsZ
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
SKETCH MAP Trinomial

Page 5 of 6 ends

*Drawn By: Neal Neuenschwander *Date 2/28/22
DPR 523K (1/95) *Required information

L ___
66 WEST BEECHWOOD AVENUE, FRESNO0
----------------------------------------------------—---------------— < F
w.
>
%
*
RESIDENCE-'Garage
0 *•
* 4
9 L
1 I
#
=:
<
4 i
%
J J]f4 % |
*
I True North t
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial

Page 6 of 6 ends

*Map Name: Fresno North, Calif. Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1965 (1981) DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information

- {V '• \ m Vi .• . \\orAJtO*I •
\l ini
A ■a A™n
c-
/ I)-
i;
J*
Fort Washington LincolI , I Si
•P / /*-Vyf\ TEAGUEPi-
27 jire-28 v/ Ik
^ a
(•'(7" 7
| h/J-t SI
71 ^
oSJ /
■ ><•» /' UJ
Well■355* 2 SLAVONIANGravel
'Pitj 1
c
4 36/
&
A
AA
360
Jr •350-
W' BM, I *
35\
W0r*lA . 7 NEES
4,--g-- jsa- o,
J
UJ
>
I2, <1
.-•■-if s
smo; a£ UJIE•(?, ♦ Sewag<?
sf5 / DlsposalJ
a <0
Trailer
Parks !
V '♦
n
l11\!* '
200< UJ
m MTni
UJc>
t=J
. 34%/33 J52■ML •
“
*

CANALST
.1 #•
UJ
£>M Pol ^±414:* L -350'
66 Beechwood Avenue, Fresno' r?7
Drive-inj
<Vi Theater
it3 • T 1-1■I1
ss-.v-w# \'k- K '
I*i [»■•■!
IA>J 7
■ mi .

W4F/l
-1, HEfiNDON.. :-.|
re
i -/TRisg • .r":i* $ Sla ■336
-w
W>ni
- - : 338
n [ L_rio :•: ill :T
r
it=o ui . i_ . ;
Si* .

Trailer
dSfrfc
m==> |
Well :I !Ii: >332
■ '■
:

Well
j :

Tr '
336
H O
2 * A lrai,er
S^SfPark
■ e1
7" a , ■•
• ■Mir
.. “ \ji
~?f
ton! u
5 LlA—c,r=
34 Jik AVE,
SE™HL■■
km- ■■ • V *•BM
UJ
fff
—o
'T
N
:\\u
4 o
■ ou.f •‘■I. - AVE
Well
J
AVI:alon
!ui
AVE 336
O
. QJj
f Si^sjpiion
a
- ■" Tena>»
High Sch
MffD U.ailllLU
" r*-1
s • i •
m- BULLAkk \ ||^y |j|7
"■ml:.. I
iJSA<
I >J. 1I
I ■- S;s«Antho I
amvi
cT ■ h \! 330 ^
iLJIJ!• $
4 Njj
4VE
: i III ■Itl
V. RobinWn
SchS-s< k
■i
in«
toGibson \ Hex)Beta eh u
k
h.ki
A....» l POBATE•3)5' Well' I2S .

UL 333
1 JK£5 I' I*4
A r:"' \
y . ' -t ciz//
! I
r
V
r •• I-AVT£
3 ' /
O
i a
2‘d,
4]i/y josjIJOSE
•71 s-. WoltciI > >

Appendix C Consistency Checklist

Page 1 ends

FRESNO GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN UPDATE
MARCH 2021
Fresno Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan Update –
CEQA Project Consistency Checklist

INTRODUCTION
The City of Fresno updated its 2014 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan (the Plan) in the year 2021 to conform with existing applicable State climate change policies and regulations. The GHG Plan Update outlines strategies that the City will undertake to achieve its proportional share of GHG emission reductions. The purpose of this GHG Reduction Plan Update Consistency Checklist (Checklist) is to help the City provide a streamlined review process for new development projects that are subject to discretionary review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.5.

This Checklist has been developed as part of the GHG Plan Update implementation and monitoring process and will support the achievement of individual GHG reduction strategies as well as the City’s overall GHG reduction goals. In addition, this Checklist will further the City’s sustainability goals and policies that encourage sustainable development and aim to conserve and reduce the consumption of resources, such as energy and water. Projects that meet the requirements of this Checklist will be deemed to be consistent with the Fresno GHG Reduction Plan Update and will be found to have a less than significant contribution to cumulative GHG (i.e., the project’s incremental contribution to cumulative GHG effects is not cumulatively considerable), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b). Projects that do not meet the requirements in this Checklist will be deemed to be inconsistent with the Fresno GHG Reduction Plan Update and must prepare a project- specific analysis of GHG emissions, including quantification of existing and projected GHG emissions and incorporation of the measures in this Checklist to the extent feasible. This GHG Checklist can be updated to reflect adoption of new GHG reduction strategies or to comply with any changes and updates in the Plan or local, State or federal regulations. Note that not all the measures in the checklist are applicable to all projects. The projects should comply with applicable measures from the checklist.

City of

Page 2 ends

FRESNO GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN UPDATE
MARCH 2021

1. Project Information
Contact Information
Project No./Name:

Address:

Applicant Name/Co:

Contact Information:

Project Information

1. What is the Site acreage of the Project?

2. Identify all Applicable Proposed Land uses:
a. Residential (Indicate number of single-family units) b. Residential (Indicate number of multi-family units)
c. Commercial (total square footage)
d. Industrial (total square footage)
e. Other (describe)

3. Is the project or a portion of the project located in a transit priority area? (Y/N)

4. Provide a brief description of the project proposed:

City of
a«v4is?

Page 3 ends

FRESNO GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN UPDATE
MARCH 2021

2. Determining Land Use Consistency
Checklist Item
As the first step in determining the consistency with the GHG Reduction Plan for discretionary development projects, this section allows the City to determine the project’s consistency with the land use assumptions used in the GHG Reduction Plan.

Yes No

1. Is the proposed project consistent with the approved General Plan, Specific Plan, and Community Plan planned land use and zoning designations?
If the answer is Yes, then proceed to the GHG Plan Update Consistency Checklist.

If the answer is No, then proceed to question 2.

2. If the proposed project is not consistent with the approved planned land use and zoning designation(s), then provide estimated GHG project emissions under both existing and proposed designation(s) for comparison. Compare the maximum buildout of the existing designation with the maximum buildout of the proposed designation.

If the estimated project emissions at maximum buildout of the proposed designation(s) is equivalent to or less than the estimated project emissions at maximum buildout of the existing designation(s), then in accordance with the City’s Significance Determination Thresholds, the project’s GHG impact is less than significant. If there is a proposed development project associated with this plan amendment and or rezone then complete the GHG Plan Update Consistency Checklist and incorporate applicable measures, otherwise there is no further step required.

If the estimated project emission at maximum buildout of the proposed designation(s) is greater than the estimated project emissions at maximum buildout of the existing designation(s), then in accordance with the City’s Significance Determination Thresholds, the project’s GHG impact is significant. The project must either show consistency with applicable GP objectives and policies (provide applicable GP objectives and policies here) or provide analysis and measures to incorporate into the project to bring the GHG emissions to a level that is less than or equal to the estimated project emission at maximum buildout of the existing designation(s) unless the decision
-maker
finds that a measure is infeasible in accordance with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15091. If there is a proposed development project associated with this plan amendment and or rezone then complete the GHG Plan Update Consistency Checklist and incorporate applicable measures, otherwise there is no further step required.

City of
%|=i%

Page 1 ends

FRESNO GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN UPDATE
MARCH 2021

3. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan Update - CEQA Project Consistency Checklist GHG Reduction Plan Update consistency review involves the evaluation of project consistency with the applicable strategies of the GHG Reduction Plan Update. The GHG reduction strategies identified in the GHG Reduction Plan Update relies upon the General Plan and additional local measures as the basis of the development related strategies to reduce GHG emissions. This checklist is developed based on the key local GHG reduction strategies and actions identified in the GHG Reduction Plan Update that are applicable to proposed development projects. Note that not all strategies listed below will apply to all projects. For example, not all projects will meet mixed-use related policies of the General Plan, because not all projects are required to be mixed use.

Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable
(NA) Explanation
1: Land Use and Transportation Demand Strategies
a. Does the project include mixed-use, development? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, mixed-use development is defined as pedestrian-friendly development that blends two or more residential, commercial, cultural, or institutional, uses, one of which must be residential
Policy UF-1-c, LU-3-b,
Objective-UF 12, UF-12-a,
UF-12-b, UF-12-d,
Policy RC-2-a
b. Is the project high density? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, is the project developed at 12 units per acre or higher?
LU-5-f
c. Is the project infill development, pursuant to the General Plan definition of location within the City limits as of December 31, 2012? LU-2-a, Objective-12,
UF-12-a, UF-12-b, UF-12-d
d. Does the project implement pedestrian bicycle, and transit linkages with surrounding land uses and neighborhoods? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, the project must include all sidewalks, paths, trails, and facilities required by the General Plan and Active Transportation Plan, as implemented through the Fresno Municipal Code and project conditions of approval.

Policy UF-1-c, UF-12-e,
Policy RC-2-a, Objective
MT-4,5,6, Policy MT-4-c,
Policy MT-6-a, Policy POSS-
7-h Objective MT 8, Policies
MT-8-a, MT-8-b
e. If the project includes mixed-use or high density development, is it located within ½ mile of a High Quality Transit Area as defined in the City’s CEQA Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled? Or, is the project located within 500 feet of an existing or planned transit stop?
Policy UF-12-a,
UF-12-b, LU-3-b, Objective
MT 8, Policies MT-8-a,
MT-8-b
f. Will the project accommodate a large employer (over 100 employees) and will it implement trip reduction programs such as increasing transit use, carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, or other measures to reduce vehicle miles traveled pursuant to San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Rule 9410?
See the SJVAPCD website for details: https://www.valleyair.org/rules/ currntrules/r9410.pdf
Policy MT-8-b, Objective
MT-9, Policy MT-10-c, San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District Rule 9410
'Vi/ |v P Ajio

Page 2 ends

FRESNO GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN UPDATE
MARCH 2021
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable
(NA) Explanation
g. If the project includes modifications to the transportation network, do those improvements meet the requirements of the City of Fresno’s Complete Streets Policy, adopted in October 2019? According to the policy, a complete street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users - including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, trucks, and motorists - appropriate to the function and context of the facility while connecting to a larger transportation network.

See City of Fresno website for details: https://www.fresno.gov/publicworks/wp- content/uploads/sites/17/2019/10/Complete-Streets-091119.pdf MT-1-g, MT-1-h
h. Does the project have a less than significant VMT impact, either through satisfying screening criteria or mitigating VMT impacts, pursuant to the City’s adopted VMT thresholds?
See City of Fresno website for details: https://www.fresno.gov/darm/wp- content/uploads/sites/10/2021/01/CEQA-Guidelines-for-Vehicle-Miles-Traveled- Final-Adopted-Version.pdf
MT-2-b, MT-2-c
2: Electric Vehicle Strategies
a. For new multi-family dwelling units with parking, does the project provide EV charging spaces capable of supporting future EV supply equipment (EV capable) at 10% of the parking spaces per 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.106.4 Policy RC-8-j
b. For new commercial buildings, does project provide EV charging spaces capable of supporting EV capable spaces at 4% to 10% of the parking spaces per 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 5.106.5.3
Policy RC-8-j
3: Energy Conservation Strategies
a. Does the project meet or exceed mandatory state building energy codes? If yes, does the project follow any other GreenPoint ratings such as LEED, Energy Star or others? If yes, indicate level of certification-Silver, gold, platinum if applicable?
Policy RC-5-c, Objective
RC-8, Policy RC 8-a
b. For commercial projects, does the project achieve net zero emissions electricity?
Mark NA if project will be permitted before 2030. Mark Yes if voluntary. Add source and capacity in explanation.

Additional Recommended
GHG Plan Measure,
supports Objective RC-8
'Vi/ |v P Ajio

Page 3 ends

FRESNO GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN UPDATE
MARCH 2021
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable
(NA) Explanation
4: Water Conservation Strategies
a. Does the project meet or exceed the mandatory outdoor water use measures of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.304?
If the project exceeds CalGreen Code mandatory measures provide methods in excess of requirements in the explanation.

Examples include outdoor water conservation measures such as; drought tolerant landscaping plants, compliant irrigation systems, xeriscape, replacing turf etc. Provide the conservation measure that the project will include in the explanation.

Objective RC-7,
Policy RC-7-a, RC-7-h
b. Does the project meet or exceed the mandatory indoor water use measures of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.303?
If the project exceeds CalGreen Code, mandatory measures provide methods in excess of requirements in the explanation. Examples may include water conserving devices and systems such as water leak detection system, hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves, energy efficient appliances such as Energy Star Certified dishwashers, washing machines, dual flush toilets, point of use and/or tankless water heaters.

Objective RC-7,
Policy RC-7-a, RC-7-e
5: Waste Diversion and Recycling Strategies
a. Does the project implement techniques of solid waste segregation, disposal and reduction, such as recycling, composting, waste to energy technology, and/or waste separation, to reduce the volume of solid wastes that must be sent to landfill facilities?
Policy PU-9-a, RC-11-a
b. During construction will the project recycle construction and demolition waste?
Policy RC-11-a
c. Does the project provide recycling canisters in public areas where trashcans are also provided?
Policy RC-11-a
Note: The GHG reduction strategies included in this checklist are based on the GHG reduction strategies identified in the Chapter 5 of the GHG Reduction Plan Update. 'Vi/ |v P Ajio

Appendix D Trip Generation Analysis

www.JLBtraffic.com

[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 1
(559) 570-8991

April 08, 2022

Mrs. Jill Gormley, P.E.

City of Fresno
2600 Fresno Street
Fresno, CA 93721-3616

Via Email Only: [email protected]

Subject: Trip Generation Analysis for the Medical Clinic located in the City of Fresno (JLB Project No. 004-143)

Dear Mrs. Gormley,
JLB Traffic Engineering, Inc. (JLB) has completed a Trip Generation Analysis (TGA) for the Medical Clinic (Project) located on the northwest quadrant of Blackstone Avenue and Herndon Avenue in the City of Fresno. The Project proposes to develop approximately 1.23 acres with an 11,664-square-foot single- story professional medical clinic. Per information provided to JLB, the proposed Project will undergo a General Plan Amendment to modify the land use from Medium Density Residential (5.0 to 12.0 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial General.

The purpose of the TGA is to evaluate the potential difference in traffic generation of the proposed Project and that which could otherwise be developed per the Fresno General Plan. The TGA will focus primarily on comparing the anticipated driveway trip generation during a weekday, AM peak hour and PM peak hour of the Project and no Project alternatives.

Project Description
The Project proposes to develop approximately 1.23 acres with an 11,664-square-foot single-story professional medical clinic. Per information provided to JLB, the proposed Project will undergo a General Plan Amendment to modify the land use from Medium Density Residential (5.0 to 12.0 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial General. Figure 1 presents the latest Project Site Plan.

Project Access
Access to and from Project will generally be from Blackstone Avenue north of Herndon Avenue. More specifically, the Project will have two (2) full access points along Sugar Pine Avenue and Beechwood Avenue. A full access to the west side of Sugar Pine Avenue is located approximately 150 feet north of Beechwood Avenue and another to the north side of Beechwood Avenue is located approximately 200 feet west of Sugar Pine Avenue.

Jl R TRAFFIC
If h BlP ENGINEERING, INC.

www.JLBtraffic.com

[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 2
(559) 570-8991

Medical Clinic - City of Fresno
Trip Generation Analysis
April 08, 2022
Figure 1: Project Site Plan

J
\
-A
77777777777777777/
i J#
V
* . .......... &
■
1 ’///////////////////////
W. FIR ©© Q
0 © o a
T-
0 0
1 >
"i
J -
3 s ■3©
lr a ^ <
oI
Ain* *
't
t -
V ■i " n h .
i
i i
ri:
tw! j e^g
i I**S*
x-0- 0I
V
:■■■
i
A
*
3 rA
-EJj?
! ■■ATWOTT
«WOrv
h*:
.j
:U",
\
n ■cnw-a in i
L %0.£ G>1**1* III
•:
liI Jr it+ui JS :v
© %
i n
ilk-
O .-•. r,: ■ 1- i:0 fto
1 A ii.}'. /a A 6 ■ © .t ' T>.fCf
I
G G
* v-
G - - j
i
ry 0 -. '0 .I I I
--L-'kt i “j ■ - ©O *"0 OG O ©
a
©1 I
>®
III
" + Q \ V.

Ill i __Uo p
«v J
fti A Ljt®iACLKXMI
HUTOIY
NIC,
I
xy I-
FT hi
j ® '©
i
-- jL-
£
; i
1 I
/ « i - .i111
0i Q* fi in
Qj~ -vQ .11
© .'If ® > *0 v ra \f'O 0 -^-ov:. □ 111 I il
0 i M
-nr
I "9 /© © -V i
If—G ■
®jjfi ,i, _
—vj- ,-<$p) '
■■■■'
II :.i
jjGO i ii
■G '

IIIHII/ I
&////////// tI
f?. I, t.
©'/////////////A - i
H ©mi
£
■
Q
10+ ♦©
L
- 0 TVin
I
J IZ3Z- r ©
r i'
#
i i oi W. BEECHWOOD AVE.00 © 6i hi
©i i i
X4 I—
T
Jl R TRAFFIC
WhH# ENGINEERING, INC.

www.JLBtraffic.com

[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 3
(559) 570-8991

Medical Clinic - City of Fresno
Trip Generation Analysis
April 08, 2022
Project Trip Generation
Trip generation rates for the proposed Project were obtained from the 10th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table I presents the trip generation for the proposed Project with trip generation rates for 11,664 square feet of Medical-Dental Office Building space. At buildout, the proposed Project is estimated to generate a maximum of 406 daily trips, 32 AM peak hour trips and 40 PM peak hour trips.

Table I: Project Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Unit
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Rate Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total
% %
Medical-Dental Office Building
(720) 11.664 k.s.f. 34.80 406 2.78 78 22 25 7 32 3.46 28 72 11 29 40 Total Project Trips 406 25 7 32 11 29 40
Note: k.s.f. = Thousand Square Feet
General Plan Trip Generation
The General Plan proposes that the Project site be developed with Single-Family Detached Housing units under the Medium Density Residential land use (5.0 to 12.0 dwelling units per acre). For purposes of this comparison, it is assumed that the Project site is developed according to the median density range allowable for Medium Density Residential of 8.5 ((5 + 12) ÷ 2 = 8.5) dwelling units per acre. Table II presents the trip generation of that which could otherwise be developed consistent with the General Plan with trip generation rates for 11 Single-Family Detached Housing units. Consistent with the General Plan, the Project site is anticipated to generate a maximum of 104 daily trips, 8 AM peak hour trips and 11 PM peak hour trips.

Table II: General Plan Trip Generation
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Unit
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Rate Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total Trip
Rate
In Out
In Out Total
% %
Single-Family Detached Housing
(210) 11 d.u. 9.44 104 0.74 25 75 2 6 8 0.99 63 37 7 4 11 Total Project Trips 104 2 6 8 7 4 11 Note: d.u. = Dwelling Units

Jl R TRAFFIC
If h BlP ENGINEERING, INC.

www.JLBtraffic.com

[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 4
(559) 570-8991

Medical Clinic - City of Fresno
Trip Generation Analysis
April 08, 2022
Trip Generation Comparison
Compared to that which could be developed consistent with the General Plan, the proposed Project is estimated to generate more traffic by 302 daily trips, 24 AM peak hour trips and 29 PM peak hour trips.

The trip generation comparison between the proposed Project and the General Plan is available in Table III.

Table III: Difference in Trip Generation
Daily AM (7-9) Peak Hour PM (4-6) Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out Total
Project 406 25 7 32 11 29 40
General Plan 104 2 6 8 7 4 11
Difference in Trip
Generation 302 23 1 24 4 25 29

Transportation Impact Study Needs
Per the Fresno Traffic Impact Study Report Guidelines, a Transportation Impact Study (TIS) Report for a Project may be required when the following thresholds are met:

1. When project-generated traffic is expected to be greater than 100 vehicle trips during any peak hour.

2. When a project includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) which changes the land use.

3. When the project traffic will substantially affect an intersection or roadway segment already identified as operating at an unacceptable level of service.

4. When the project will substantially change the offsite transportation system or connection to it, as determined by the Traffic Engineering Manager.

Moreover, the Fresno General Plan has established four (4) Traffic Impact Zones (TIZs) within the City of Fresno to assist with areas being incentivized for development. In the City of Fresno, all developments within TIZ-I maintain a LOS standard of F and require a TIS when projected to generate greater than 200 peak hour new vehicle trips. In addition, all developments within TIZ-II maintain a LOS standard of E and require a TIS when projected to generate greater than 200 peak hour new vehicle trips. Also, all developments within TIZ-III maintain a LOS standard of D and require a TIS when projected to generate greater than 100 peak hour new vehicle trips. Lastly, all developments within TIZ-IV maintain a LOS standard of E and require a TIS when projected to generate greater than 200 peak hour new vehicle trips.

Considering the Project is located within TIZ-III and its anticipated trip generation will not exceed 40 peak hour trips, a TIS would likely not be required. Additionally, the Project is located in an area where all major streets have been developed to meet or exceed the planned number of lanes. Also, all major street-to-major street intersections near the vicinity of the Project site are currently signalized and further improvements to these intersections are not anticipated by City of Fresno or Caltrans agencies.

As a result, the preparation of a TIS beyond that which is included in this technical letter is not recommended.

Jl R TRAFFIC
If h BlP ENGINEERING, INC.

www.JLBtraffic.com

[email protected]
516 W. Shaw Ave., Ste. 103
Fresno, CA 93704 Page | 5
(559) 570-8991

Medical Clinic - City of Fresno
Trip Generation Analysis
April 08, 2022
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions and recommendations presented below regarding the Project located on the northwest quadrant of Blackstone Avenue and Herndon Avenue in the City of Fresno are based on the results of the TGA.
• The proposed Project will undergo a General Plan Amendment to modify the land use from Medium Density Residential (5.0 to 12.0 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial General. • At buildout, the proposed Project is estimated to generate a maximum of 406 daily trips, 32 AM peak hour trips and 40 PM peak hour trips.
• Consistent with the General Plan, it is assumed that the Project site is developed according to the median density range allowable for Medium Density Residential of 8.5 dwelling units per acre. In this case, the Project site is anticipated to generate a maximum of 104 daily trips, 8 AM peak hour trips and 11 PM peak hour trips.
• Compared to that which could be developed consistent with the General Plan, the proposed Project is estimated to generate more traffic by 302 daily trips, 24 AM peak hour trips and 29 PM peak hour trips.
• Based on JLB’s knowledge of the proposed Project’s surrounding area, all major streets have been developed to meet or exceed their planned number of lanes and further improvements to these or nearby intersections are not anticipated.
• The proposed Project is not substantially changing the offsite transportation system or connections to it.
• Based on the findings and knowledge of the proposed Project’s surrounding area, JLB believes that this TGA satisfies the City’s requirements for the proposed Project to be processed. • While the proposed Project will not have a significant change in traffic to warrant the completion of a detailed traffic study, City of Fresno staff must make the final determination.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me via phone at (559) 570- 8991, or via email at [email protected] .

Sincerely,

Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., T.E.

President

Z:\01 Projects\004 Fresno\004-143 Valley Health Team\Letter\01 TGA Letter\L06232021 Medical Clinic TGA.docx Jl R TRAFFIC
If h BlP ENGINEERING, INC.
1 Mitigation Measure Monitoring Program for
Development Permit Application No. P22-00505 & Plan
Amendment Rezone Application No. P22-00507

This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the proposed Valley Health Team Project (project). The MMRP, which is found in Table A of this section, lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the proposed project and identifies mitigation monitoring requirements. The MMRP must be adopted when the City Council makes a final decision on the proposed project.

This MMRP has been prepared to comply with the requirements of State law (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). State law requires the adoption of an MMRP when mitigation measures are required to avoid significant impacts. This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process. The MMRP is intended to ensure compliance during implementation of the project.

The MMRP is organized in a matrix format. The first column identifies the mi tigation measure. The second column, entitled “Mitigation Responsibility,” refers to the party responsible for implementing the mitigation measure. The third column, entitled “Monitoring/Reporting Agency,” refers to the agency responsible for oversight or ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The fourth column, entitled “Monitoring Schedule,” refers to when monitoring will occur to ensure that the mitigating action is completed. The fifth column, entitled “Verification,” will be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to the project specific mitigation.

2 This page left intentionally blank.

← All documents from this meeting