KCCTOD
STUDY
CITY OF FRESNO
RECENT PLANS STUDY AREA STUDY OBJECTIVE
PRESENTATION
OVERVIEW
PLANNING PROCESS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT DOCUMENT OVERVIEW RECENT
PLANS
INFILL & TOD
GENERAL PLAN ROUTE 1 [Q LINE]
COMPLETE STREETS PLAN
2014
2015
2018
STUDY
AREA
KCCTOD
Identify which “Q” line stops along the Corridor have the greatest near-term market potential for compact, higher density mixed-use development.
Develop Station Area Plans for the top two stations with the greatest near-term market potential.
Develop a standardized TOD implementation framework
that can be applied to CMX & NMX zoned properties along High-Quality Transit Corridors.
OBJECTIVES
1 2
3 PLANNING
PROCESS
ENGAGEMENT
2,500
Reached on
Social Media
830
Outreach
Event Attendees
2 Developers
Forums
4 Workshops
2 Mobile
Workshops
7 Presentations Pop-up Events
20 3
Surveys
253
Survey
Respondents
KINGS CANYON CORRIDOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT CONNECTIVITY STUDY
ESTUDIO DE CONNECTIVIDAD PARA EL DESARROLLO
ORIENTADO AL TRÁNSITO EN EL CORREDOR KINGS CANYON
KEV KAWM UAS CUAM TXHUAM RAU KEV TSIM KHO TXOJ
KEV TSEB THAUJ MUS LOS NTAWM KINGS CANYON
ਕਿੰਗਜ਼ ਕੈਨਿਯਨ ਕੋਰੀਡੋਰ ਟਰਾਂਜ਼ਿਟ-ਓਰੀਐਂਟਡ ਡਿਵੈਲਪਮੈਂਟ ਕਨੈਕਟੀਵਿਟੀ ਸਟੱਡੀ ZINE
VOL. 1
KINGS CANYON CORRIDOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT CONNECTIVITY STUDY
ESTUDIO DE CONNECTIVIDAD PARA EL DESARROLLO
ORIENTADO AL TRÁNSITO EN EL CORREDOR KINGS CANYON
KEV SOJ NTSUAM TXOG QHOV TSIM KHO NTU KEV
NTAWM KINGS CANYON
ਕਿੰਗਜ਼ ਕੈਨਿਯਨ ਕੋਰੀਡੋਰ ਟਰਾਂਜ਼ਿਟ-ਓਰੀਐਂਟਡ ਡਿਵੈਲਪਮੈਂਟ ਕਨੈਕਟੀਵਿਟੀ ਸਟੱਡੀ VOL.
II
c
ਕਿੰਗਜ਼ ਕੈਨਿਯਨ ਕੋਰੀਡੋਰ ਟਰਾਂਜ਼ਿਟ-ਓਰੀਐਂਟਡ ਡਿਵੈਲਪਮੈਂਟ
ਕਨੈਕਟੀਵਿਟੀ ਸਟੱਡੀ
KINGS CANYON CORRIDOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT CONNECTIVITY STUDY
ESTUDIO DE CONNECTIVIDAD PARA EL
DESARROLLO ORIENTADO AL TRÁNSITO EN EL
CORREDOR KINGS CANYON
KEV SOJ NTSUAM TXOG QHOV TSIM KHO NTU
KEV NTAWM KINGS CANYON
k
c c t o d
VOL. III
Kings Canyon Corridor
Transit-Oriented Development Connectivity Study
Estudio de Connectividad
para el Desarrollo Orientado al Transito en el Corredor Kings Canyon Kev Soj Ntsuam
Txog Qhov Tsim Kho
Ntu kev Ntwam
Kings Canyon
illustrated by:
Marisela Martinez & Kara Hammerschmidt
ਕਿੰਗਜ਼ ਕੈਨਿਯਨ ਕੋਰੀਡੋਰ ਟਰਾਂਜ਼ਿਟਓਰੀਐਂਟਡ ਡਿਵੈਲਪਮੈਂਟ ਕਨੈਕਟੀਵਿਟੀ ਸਟੱਡੀ
ZINE VOL. IV
INTRODUCTION A VISION FOR THE CORRIDOR STORYMAP
1 This Chapter describes the Study Area, background, and purpose of the Study. It also describes the opportunity that the Study presents.
This Chapter is organized into the following sections:
1.1 Background
1.2 Purpose
1.3 Study Area
1.4 The Opportunity Before Us
INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTATION
3 STORYMAP This Chapter directs the reader to a web-based platform that showcases the information contained in this Study. The StoryMap combines maps and multimedia content to communicate the information in an interactive manner. This Chapter may be used as a standalone resource, in tandem with Chapter 4, and / or with the document as a whole.
This Chapter is organized into the following sections:
3.1 What is a StoryMap?
3.2 StoryMap Highlights
2 A VISION FOR
THE CORRIDOR This Chapter describes the role of community engagement in the planning and implementation process, outlines recommended strategies, and highlights the magazines (zines) that were used throughout the Study to convey information and share the vision of community members in story form.
This Chapter is organized in the following sections:
2.1 Engaging the Community
2.2 A Path Forward
2.3 Zine Vol. I - IV
5 APPENDICES
IMPLEMENTATION includes a summary of potential funding and financing resources to promote TOD.
This Chapter is organized into the following sections:
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Funding & Financing Resources
5.3 Existing City Resources
5.4 Tax-Increment Financing
5.5 State & Federal Programs
A
APPENDICES
TOD PROSPECTUS
4 TOD PROSPECTUS
This Chapter describes the key investment opportunities and station area plans developed throughout the Study process. The development concepts presented in this chapter can be applied to other High-Quality Transit Corridors in the City. Chapter 4 may also be used as a standalone document to attract investment along the Corridor.
This Chapter is organized into the following sections:
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Key Investment Opportunities
4.3 Station Areas
DOCUMENT
OVERVIEW
STATION
PLANS &
PROTOTYPES
VENTURA AVE
8th AVECEDAR AVE
E KINGS CANYON RD
S MAPLE AVECHESTNUT AVE
Potential Development Sites Along the Corridor
(1) INFILL (2) INFILL - MIXED USE (3) WALK-UP APARTMENTS The following represent common building prototypes that either exist in the Cedar or Chestnut/Willow Station areas or may be developed within the range of housing densities currently allowed by the zoning for the Study Area.
DEVELOPMENT PROTOTYPES
(4) SENIOR COTTAGES (5) TOWNHOMES (6) ADAPTIVE REUSE
55,085 sf
of residential space
13,070 sf
of landscape/open space
58 parking stalls
Conceptual Rendering of Prototype
Conceptual Plan - First Floor
Conceptual Plan - Second-Fourth Floors
Development Program -
Market Rate (2A)
Prototype 2 - Mixed-use
Residential - Market Rate (2A)
Lot Size 49,707 sf
Number of Units 54 units
Gross Residential Area 55,085 sf
Net Residential Area 38,880 sf
Average Unit Size 720 sf
Gross Commercial Area 5,250 sf
Common Area/Amenity 7,350 sf
Gross Building Area (ex. Pkg.) 67,685 sf
Net Residential & Commercial 44,130 sf
Parking 22,600 sf
Parking Spaces 58 spaces
Landscaped Areas 13,070 sf
Revenue Per SF Per Unit Total
Residential Rent (Sales Rev.) $35.50 $25,560 $1,380,240 Laundry, etc. $0.25 $180 $9,720
Commercial Inc. (per net com) $18.00 $1,750 $94,500
Less Vacancy (5%) ($1.68) ($1,375) ($74,223)
Gross Effective Income $31.96 $26,116 $1,410,237
Less Operating (Sales) Exp. ($9.49) ($7,756) ($418,797) Net Annual Operating Income $22.47 $18,360 $991,440
Development Costs Per SF Per Unit Total
Shell Costs $261 $213,357 $11,521,279
Land ($10 per sf of land area) $11 $9,205 $497,070
Site Improvements $11 $9,205 $497,070
TI Allowance, commercial $1 $972 $52,500
Permits & Fees $7 $5,484 $296,150
Contingency (5% of direct costs) $14 $11,128 $600,917
Other Soft Costs $30 $24,536 $1,324,947
Financing $11 $8,700 $469,800
Return on Cost Per SF Per Unit 6.5%
Target Return on Cost N/A N/A 6.5%
Supported Investment $346 N/A $15,252,923
Estimated Development Cost $346 N/A $15,259,733
Gap to Achieve Target Return $0 $0 $6,810
A Transit Benefits Assessment was prepared by
CR Associates and is appended to this report (See
Appendix B for more details). The assessment
included analysis of the nine ‘Q’ line stations in the
Study Area against five transit orientation indicators
/ metrics to indicate the transit-supportiveness
of the station areas. Each station area was ranked
and the top scoring station areas identified were
the Cedar Station and a combined area at the
Chestnut/Willow Stations.
TOP TWO SCORING STATION AREAS:
1. CEDAR
2. CHESTNUT/WILLOW
STATION AREA PLANS
CEDAR
STATION
Positive Street Frontage - Infill development that is built out to face the street, engage with the street, and provide an active pedestrian environment.
Transparent Storefronts - Infill development that provides storefronts with transparent glazing so passersby can interact with businesses at a walking speed and businesses can maintain “eyes on the street” for natural surveillance.
Inviting Public Spaces - Infill development that invites pedestrians into shared open spaces that promote events, sidewalk seating, spillover retail, and gathering.
Cultural Expression - Infill development that is colorful, festive, artistic, and expresses a culture of place along the Corridor, its businesses, and the people who live in the area.
Streetscape Improvements - Infill development that supports widened sidewalks, landscape and trees to make the street environment pleasant and safe for everyone.
KEY POINTS
Potential mixed-use infill development on Ventura Streetscape improvements along Ventura Streetscape improvements along Ventura Potential mixed-use infill development on Ventura
CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS
CHESTNUT /
WILLOW
1 2
FRAMEWORK
Enhance the
Streetscape
Make New
Connections
3 4
FRAMEWORK
Embrace
Opportunities
for Placemaking
Integrate
Selective New
Development
Residential integrated with existing commercial “big box” Placemaking in a commercial center parking lot
Mobility hub at the Chestnut Station
Placemaking in a commercial center parking lot
CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS
STORYMAP
QUESTIONS?
END