Open Space can include larger community and
regional parks.
Open Space can include neighborhood-serving open
space.
Housing abutting residential open space and
playgrounds.
3-10 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
C. DEVELOPMENT
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
The following development capacity analysis
describes the number of single-family and multifamily housing dwelling units; square feet of commercial, office, and public facility development;
and park acreage anticipated in the Plan Area in the
30-year timeframe of the Plan. Development capacity numbers were calculated for the Plan based on the Plan’s land uses, using the General Plan’s
dwelling units per acre and FAR capacity numbers.
Table 3-1 describes only the development capacity
for development within the Plan Area boundary.
LAND USES DEVELOPMENT
CAPACITY
Single-family housing 4,083 dwelling units
Multi-family housing 1,840 dwelling units
HOUSING TOTAL 5,923 dwelling units
Commercial 1,546,888 square feet
Employment 748,820 square feet
Parks/Open Space 75 acres
Public Facilities
118 acres or
1,443,814 square feet
TABLE 3-1 Development Capacities for the
Plan Area
It should be noted that, like the General Plan, the
development capacities in Table 3-1 are for new development and only take into account the development of parcels that have higher opportunities for development, such as parcels that are vacant, open
agriculture, or rural residential (partially vacant).
These opportunity sites for development are
highlighted in Figure 3-4.
The development capacity analysis of the Plan Area
is described below:
■ Housing. The community and Steering
Committee desire a shift in the ratio of
single-family housing to multi-family housing
from the residential land uses identified in
the General Plan for Southwest Fresno. The
Plan shows a larger amount of single-family
housing compared to multi-family housing
when compared to the General Plan. The Plan’s
ratio is 70 percent single-family housing to
30 percent multi-family housing in the Plan
Area, while the ratio citywide is 62 percent
single-family housing to 38 percent “other”
units, including multi-family and attached
single-family housing.
■ Commercial. The amount of commercial
development in the Plan Area accounts for new
Corridor/Center Mixed-Use, Neighborhood
Mixed-Use, Regional Commercial, and
Community Commercial areas.
■ Employment. Employment areas consist of
purely Office land uses rather than a mix of
Office, Industrial, and Business Park uses.
■ Parks/Open Space. The amount of Parks/Open
Space accounts for new neighborhood parks
to serve complete neighborhoods and a larger
park adjacent to the community college to
support the MLK Activity Center magnet core.
■ Public Facilities. The amount of public facilities
accounts for new schools that would serve
complete neighborhoods, a future community
college in the MLK Activity Center magnet core,
and a public facility buffer between residential
neighborhoods and industrial uses south of
North Avenue.
Although the surrounding SOI is not a part of the
Plan Area (with the exception of the MLK Activity
Center), as a part of the visioning process, the SOI’s
land uses were considered since the General Plan
includes the SOI for its development capacity. The
surrounding SOI has a large amount of development potential because it is mostly undeveloped and therefore contains a large amount of opportunity sites. The Plan’s vision includes the following amount of development in the SOI: about 9,400
housing units, with approximately 80 percent of
those units as single-family housing and 20 percent
as multi-family housing; a moderate amount of
commercial space at about 840,000 commercial
building square feet; a high amount of employment
space at about 3.9 million employment building
square feet; a moderate amount of parks/open
space; and a moderate amount of public facilities
space.
Chapter 3 | Land Use 3-11
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
DANRONQUILLO DR
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
WEST AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
MERCED ST
R ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
STANISLAUS ST
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
BELGRAVIA AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
POPPY AVE
LOTUS AVE
AIRPORT RD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
CHURCH AVE
JENSEN AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
FIG AVENUE MLK JR. BLVD
HUGHES AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
Plan Area
Sphere of Influence
Opportunity Sites
City Limit
Existing Development
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
FIGURE 3-4 Opportunity Sites in the Plan Area and Existing Development 41 180
99 41
180
Source: City of Fresno
FIGURE 3-4 Opportunity Sites in the Plan Area and Existing Development 3-12 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
D. GOALS AND POLICIES
The following goals and related policies support
the framework for the development of the Plan’s
land uses and urban form, implementing the Plan’s
vision as described in Chapter 2. The Plan’s goals
and polices are intended to work in tandem with
and refine those of the General Plan.
Goal LU-1 Establish Southwest Fresno as an
attractive and desirable community through the creation of activity centers that provide a variety of
housing types and a compatible
mix of non-residential uses such
as retail, services, jobs, and recreation uses to Southwest Fresno residents and visitors.
Policy LU-1.1 Establish two magnet cores – a
southern magnet core at the MLK
Activity Center and a northern
magnet core at Marks and Whites
Bridge Avenues – that attract a
significant amount of new development and accommodate regional retail stores, educational and/or
medical facilities, and a range of
housing types.
Policy LU-1.2 Following the Fresno General Plan
amendment to approve the Plan
Area’s proposed land uses, amend
the Fresno General Plan to approve
the proposed land uses located
outside of the Plan Area and in
the SOI as shown in the Vision for
Southwest Fresno for the purposes
of future annexation.
Goal LU-2 Revitalize existing key corridors in
Southwest Fresno, building off the
existing character and potential of
the streets, to strengthen neighborhood identity and appeal, attract new development, and
to connect neighborhoods and
magnets.
Policy LU-2.1 Capitalize on the Downtown HighSpeed Rail (HSR) station, Fresno Area Express (FAX) transit hub,
and future Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
lines to promote transit-oriented
development along corridors.
Policy LU-2.2 Improve the visual appeal of
corridors through streetscape
improvements, new development,
and the renovation of existing
development.
Policy LU-2.3 Attract and encourage regionalserving, big box retail, housing and park uses along Whites Bridge
Avenue to support a Regional Retail
Corridor.
Policy LU-2.4 Attract and encourage low-density
residential development with
enhanced design and landscaping
standards along Kearney Boulevard
to support a Historic Corridor,
while preserving the corridor’s
scenic quality.
Policy LU-2.5 Attract and encourage higher-density mixed use development along California Avenue, connecting to
Downtown Fresno, FAX, and HSR
with a future BRT line, to support a
Mixed-Use Corridor.
Policy LU-2.6 Attract and encourage office uses
along Jensen Avenue, connecting
the magnet core west of MLK Jr.
Boulevard to Highway 41, in order
to support a Jobs Corridor.
Policy LU-2.7 Attract and encourage lowerdensity mixed use, commercial, and office uses along Elm Avenue
to support a Mixed-Use and Jobs
Corridor with the potential of a
future BRT line to connect the
southern portion of the Specific
Plan Area to Downtown.
Chapter 3 | Land Use 3-13
Goal LU-3 Create a diversity of new complete neighborhoods that are safe, healthy, self-sufficient,
walkable, and interconnected
and strengthen existing neighborhoods so that they become a complete neighborhood.
Policy LU-3.1 Encourage the development of
centers, or nodes, within walking
and biking distance of residents
and surrounded by residences.
Nodes should consist of a park, a
school, and quality neighborhood
retail and services.
Policy LU-3.2 Encourage complete neighborhoods to be located at the intersections of major streets for
easy access and high visibility,
while ensuring safe ingress and
egress (e.g., use of frontage roads).
For existing neighborhoods, nodes
should be created or strengthened
with additional uses such as retail
and/or parks. For potential new
neighborhoods, nodes should be
sited at a location accessible to
both nearby residents in the new
neighborhood and visitors from
outside the neighborhood.
Policy LU-3.3 Implement Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) principles and strategies in
new residential, commercial, and
open space development to help
provide better safety and security.
Goal LU-4 Maintain the use and character
of existing residential neighborhoods, while improving the quality of housing and encouraging homeownership, and remediate
Southwest Fresno’s blighting
conditions to improve the community’s image, attract private investment, and create a pleasant
living environment.
Policy LU-4.1 Encourage programs that allow
Southwest Fresno residents to
become homeowners.
Policy LU-4.2 Preserve the residential nature of
existing residential neighborhoods
in the Plan Area.
Policy LU-4.3 Encourage programs that help
fund the rehabilitation of old and
deteriorating single-family and
multi-family housing stock targeting the most blighted properties and areas.
Policy LU-4.4 Ensure minimum quality standards
for rental housing and require all
rental properties to comply with
the City’s Rental Housing Improvement Act.
Policy LU-4.5 Create design standards that
promote high-quality, aestheticallyattractive, and architecturally-consistent building design for building improvements.
Policy LU-4.6 Encourage prioritization of infill
development within existing neighborhoods above new development in undeveloped areas.
Policy LU-4.7 Promote and adhere to the City’s
“Restore Fresno” program that
requires property owners to clean
up visible blight, register vacant
properties, and adhere to City
codes.
Goal LU-5 Provide a diverse range of housing types in Southwest Fresno, preserving Southwest Fresno’s
character as a primarily singlefamily residential community while providing higher-density
housing in high activity areas.
Policy LU-5.1 Encourage new residential
development to be primarily
single-family residences, especially
in areas outside of magnet cores
and corridors.
3-14 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Policy LU-5.2 Encourage new multi-family
condominiums and apartments to
be located in various contexts such
as close to neighborhood nodes,
near magnet cores, and along
corridors so that higher-density
housing is not concentrated in a
single location within Southwest
Fresno.
Policy LU-5.3 Create affordable new single-family
housing through the provision of
smaller housing types on smaller
lots.
Goal LU-6 Provide opportunities for quality
retail shopping at regional and
neighborhood levels.
Policy LU-6.1 Attract and encourage larger
regional retail development at key
locations that have good proximity,
visibility, and access from the
greatest number of people and
neighborhood stores in neighborhood nodes and along corridors.
Key locations include within the
Regional Retail magnet core and
College magnet core, which is also
known as the MLK Activity Center.
Policy LU-6.2 Discourage the expansion and/or
development of potentially controversial retail uses such as pay day loans and liquor stores.
Policy LU-6.3 Increase access to fresh, affordable, and nutritious food sources with an emphasis on attracting
and encouraging small and large
food retailers such as grocery
stores, farmers’ markets, nutrition
programs, community gardens,
and food stands to provide fresh,
affordable, and nutritious foods.
Policy LU-6.4 Encourage projects and programs
to partner with local schools to
increase healthy food choices for
residents.
Goal LU-7 Promote Southwest Fresno as an
employment center with a mix of
employment opportunities and
types for residents and commuters.
Policy LU-7.1 Promote a substantial increase in
office uses to provide an environment that fosters and serves the community’s business and professional needs.
Policy LU-7.2 Encourage large-scale office
and institutional uses, including
educational facilities, and medical
facilities, to be located where
vehicles and transit have access,
and where they will attract other
similar uses.
Policy LU-7.3 Encourage smaller scale employment uses such as professional offices to be located in more remote locations and along corridors.
Goal LU-8 Address and mitigate West
Fresno’s top ranking as most
burdened by multiple sources of
pollution by protecting the health
and wellness of Southwest Fresno
residents through regulating and
reducing the negative impacts of
industrial businesses and other
sources of pollution.
Policy LU-8.1 Plan and zone employment areas
in Southwest Fresno for nonindustrial businesses. All previously designated Light Industrial, Heavy
Industrial, Business Park, and
Regional Business Park land uses
should be planned and zoned
Office.
Policy LU-8.2 Prioritize the “Reverse Triangle,”
bounded by Jensen Avenue,
Central Avenue, Highway 41, and
Highway 99, as the City’s targeted
area for new industrial development.
Chapter 3 | Land Use 3-15
Policy LU-8.3 When 85 percent of the “Reverse
Triangle,” bounded by Jensen Avenue, Central Avenue, Highway 41, and Highway 99, is developed with
Heavy Industrial uses designate
parcels along the east side of Elm
Avenue south of North Avenue for
future Light Industrial uses, mixed
with the Plan’s planned Office uses.
Policy LU-8.4 In collaboration with the appropriate local, State, and/or federal agency, regularly enforce
and evaluate performance and
performance standards on the
operation of existing industrial
activity related to air quality, odor,
and noise in order to maintain
compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods and uses.
Policy LU-8.5 Assess the compatibility of industrial and heavy commercial land uses with existing neighborhoods
through the completion of the
Industrial Land Use Compatibility
Study. The study should identify
and adopt long-term solutions
to address the findings from the
assessment. The study is to be
completed by December 8, 2017.
Policy LU-8.6 Restrict residential development
on or near toxic and/or hazardous
sites without proper evaluation
and mitigation as required by the
California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
Policy LU-8.7 Provide transparency and create a
forum between government staff,
government and elected officials,
community members, business
owners, and other stakeholders
regarding existing and proposed
industrial operations.
Goal LU-9 Locate higher intensity development in magnet cores and along corridors to support a vibrant and
pedestrian-friendly atmosphere.
Policy LU-9.1 Create active street frontages by
providing wide sidewalks with
pedestrian-scaled streetscape
amenities and orienting building
entrances toward the street.
Policy LU-9.2 Encourage parking to be consolidated into parking structures and discourage large areas to be
dominated by surface parking
visible from the street. Screen
parking lots with buildings and/or
vegetation and tree planning.
Policy LU-9.3 Design storefronts and street
elevations to be inviting, interesting, and varied, especially at the ground level.
Goal LU-10 Encourage development within
complete neighborhoods to be
convenient for residents and enhance a sense of community.
Policy LU-10.1 Provide a walkable environment
within neighborhoods by slowing
down traffic, providing wide
sidewalks with drought-tolerant
vegetation and street trees, and
creating an interconnected pedestrian network.
Policy LU-10.2 Encourage buildings within
neighborhoods to be compatible in
scale with surrounding residential
development.
3-16 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-1
DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter describes the regulations and
standards for new development to achieve the
Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (the Plan)’s guiding
principles (described in Chapter 2, Vision) and land
use policies in Chapter 3, Land Use. Throughout the
planning process, the Southwest Fresno community
provided guidance on the type of development
they desired. These regulations support that vision.
This chapter first describes the allowable land uses
in each zoning district.
In addition to the use regulations, two overlays
are identified to ensure compatibility with the
Plan’s vision and existing conditions. To support
the development of special corridors, two active
magnet cores, and new complete neighborhoods,
the chapter outlines their objectives. Projects that
strive to meet these guidelines will be favorably
received during the application and permit process.
Last, the chapter addresses ways to prevent crime
using four key principles of environmental design.
The Chapter is organized into the following
sections:
A. Introduction
B. Use Regulations
C. Kearney Boulevard Historic Corridor
Overlay
D. California Mixed-Use Corridor Overlay
E. Objectives for Special Corridors, Magnet
Cores, and Complete Neighborhoods
F. Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design
4 4-2 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
The Plan Area includes the following residential
zoning base districts (as shown in Figure 4-1):
■ Residential Single-Family, Low Density (RS-3)
■ Residential Single-Family, Medium Low Density
(RS-4)
■ Residential Single-Family, Medium Density
(RS-5)
■ Residential Multi-Family, Medium High Density
(RM-1)
■ Residential Multi-Family, Urban Neighborhood
(RM-2)
The previous chapter described the land uses
allowed in each of these zones, as well as the
character within each district. The zoning requirements for the RS-3, RS-4, and RS-5 districts are addressed in Article 9 - Residential Single-Family
Districts of the Citywide Development Code. The
RM-1 and RM-2 districts are addressed in Article
10 - Residential Multi-Family Districts. The Plan
is recommending that some additional uses be
allowed in certain zone districts. Implementation of
these revisions could occur as part of a future text
amendment to the Development Code. The City
should consider Citywide zoning amendments to
accommodate the changes in the future as part of
a separate process after the Plan’s adoption. They
are described as follows.
B. USE REGULATIONS
The following section describes the various
zoning base districts that fall within the Plan
Area and specifies what types of land uses are
permitted in specific base districts, and which
land uses are considered “conditional,” that is,
only allowed if they follow a more specific set of
rules. The Citywide Use Regulation categories are
as follows:
■ Permitted Uses. Those uses permitted in the
base district, subject to the limitations and
conditions set forth therein.
■ Uses Subject to a Conditional Use Permit.
Those uses permitted in the base district,
subject to the limitations and conditions set
forth therein.
■ Uses Not Permitted. The uses expressly
prohibited by the provisions of the base
district.
The Use Regulations in this chapter follow the Citywide Development Code’s base districts categories and, unless otherwise specified, are unchanged.
Multifamily housing.
Single-family housing.
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-3
Medium-high Density Residential (RM-1)
The Specific Plan zoning for Medium-high Density
Residential use regulations differs from the base
zoning in the Citywide Development Code in regard
to Corner Commercial. Per the Citywide Development Code, the purpose of Corner Commercial is to “allow for the development of small-scale,
neighborhood-serving commercial establishments
that can provide convenient, walkable access to
important amenities and that can increase the
sense of community and value to the surrounding
neighborhood.” It is currently Not Permitted in
the Medium-High Density Residential district; the
Specific Plan recommends Corner Commercial
shall be a Conditional Use if it meets the following
requirements:
■ Not on a local street
■ Sales area is 1,500 square feet or less
■ Provides fresh fruits and vegetables
■ Does not provide alcohol
Urban Neighborhood Residential (RM-2)
The Specific Plan zoning for Urban Neighborhood
Residential use regulations differs from the base
zoning in the Citywide Development Code in regard
to Corner Commercial. It is currently Not Permitted
in the Urban Neighborhood Residential district;
the Specific Plan recommends Corner Commercial
shall be a Conditional Use if it meets the following
requirements:
■ Not on a local street
■ Sales area is 1,500 square feet or less
■ Provides fresh fruits and vegetables
■ Does not provide alcohol
MIXED-USE DISTRICTS
The Specific Plan Area includes the following
mixed-use districts (as shown in Figure 4-1):
■ Neighborhood Mixed-Use (NMX)
■ Corridor/Center Mixed-Use (CMX)
The previous chapter described the land uses
allowed in these two zones, as well as the character
within each district. These mixed-use districts are
addressed in Article 11 of the Citywide Zoning
Code. However, there is one change to the use
regulations in the Citywide Development Code in
the Plan Area described as follows.
Corridor/Center Mixed-Use (CMX)
Specific Plan zoning for Corridor/Center Mixed-use
use regulations differs from the base zoning in the
Citywide Development Code in regard to Elderly
and Long-term Care. The Citywide Development
Code defines Elderly and Long-term Care as
“establishments that provide 24-hour medical,
convalescent, or chronic care to individuals who,
by reason of advanced age, chronic illness, or
infirmity, are unable to care for themselves, and
is licensed as a skilled nursing facility by the State
of California, including, but not limited to, rest
homes and convalescent hospitals, but not Residential Care, Hospitals, or Clinics.” It is currently Not Permitted in the Corridor/Center Mixed-use
district; the Specific Plan recommends Elderly and
Long-term Care be a Conditional use.
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
The Specific Plan Area includes the following
commercial districts (as shown in Figure 4-1):
■ Commercial − Community (CC)
■ Commercial − Regional (CR)
The previous chapter described the land uses
allowed in these two zones, as well as the character
within each district. These commercial districts are
addressed in Article 12 of the Citywide Development Code. 4-4 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS
The Specific Plan Area includes the Office (O)
employment zoning district (as shown in Figure
4-1). However, the Sphere of Influence (SOI)
outside the Plan Area includes the following
“specific limitations” to the employment zoning
district, designated as:
■ Office Restricted (O-No Auto)
■ Office* (O*)
The Office district is addressed in Article 13. The
previous chapter described the land uses allowed
in the Office district and the specific limitations of
Office Restricted within the SOI, (shown in Figure
3-1). However, there are some changes to the use
regulations in the Citywide Development Code in
the SOI. They are described as follows.
Office Restricted (O-No Auto) Overlay
A number of parcels along the south side of
Jensen Avenue in the SOI have been identified as
Office-No Auto. The Specific Plan recommends
that a future amendment be considered to
create an Office Restricted Overlay to be
applied to specific Office parcels that restrict
auto uses. The parcels designated as Office
Restricted (O-No Auto) are identical to the Office
zone, however have the following “specific
limitations”: Automobile/Vehicle Sales and
USE CLASSIFICATIONS BASE ZONING SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING
Automobile Rentals Permitted Not Permitted
Automobile/Vehicle Repair,
Major Permitted Not Permitted
Automobile/Vehicle Repair,
Minor Permitted Not Permitted
Large Vehicle and Equipment
Sales, Service and Rental Permitted Not Permitted
Service Station Permitted Not Permitted
Veterinary Services Conditional Permitted if indoor only Healthy Food Grocer Conditional Permitted
TABLE 4-1 Office Restricted (O-No Auto) Use Regulations in the Specific Plan vs. Base Zoning Services are prohibited. Table 4-1 indicates
“special limitations” for Office Restricted use
classifications that differ from the base zoning in
the Citywide Development Code.
Office* (O*)
The Office* zoning district refers to parcels within
the SOI zoned as Office, located south of North
Avenue and west of Highway 41, and shall allow
office and light industrial uses only after 85 percent
of the land in Fresno’s “Reverse Triangle” area is
occupied with heavy industrial uses. Until then, the
requirements described in the Office section above
apply.
PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC DISTRICTS
The Specific Plan Area includes the following
public zoning districts:
■ Open Space (OS)
■ Parks and Recreation (PR)
■ Public and Institutional (PI)
The previous chapter described the land uses
allowed in the Open Space, Parks and Recreation,
and Public and Institutional districts, as well as the
desired character in each. The Public and Semipublic districts are addressed in Article 14.
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-5
C. KEARNEY BOULEVARD
HISTORIC CORRIDOR
OVERLAY
Kearney Boulevard has been described as one of
the most “striking drives in all of California.”1
The
Kearney Boulevard Gateway (east of the Plan Area)
marks the entrance to this notably historic corridor,
and is recognized on the Local Register of Historic Resources. The Boulevard runs for 1.7 miles through the Plan Area where it is categorized as a
Scenic Collector in the General Plan; it continues
east and makes a dramatic s-curve in the SOI; here
it is categorized as a Scenic Drive.
PURPOSE
In order to preserve and enhance Kearney Boulevard’s historic character, it requires an historic corridor overlay to ensure new residential development and streetscape treatment is respectful of its character (see Figure 4-1). When developed
in 1900, the boulevard was planted with 50,000
eucalyptus and palm trees and oleander shrubs,
many of which continue to define the corridor today. New development should respond to the scale of existing residential development along Kearney
Boulevard. Large, single-family houses, duplexes, or
triplexes are encouraged. Frontages facing Kearney
Boulevard must be well-designed and use quality
building materials.
USES
The Kearney Boulevard Historic Corridor Overlay
includes the following abutting land uses (base
zoning):
■ Medium-high Density Residential (RM-1)
■ Medium-low Density Residential (RS-4)
■ Low Density Residential (RS-3)
■ Open Space (OS)
1 Historic Spots in California: Fifth Edition
Looking down the Historic Kearney Boulevard lined with
oleander bushes, palm trees, and eucalyptus trees (in
the distance).
The impressive tree-lined boulevard can be seen from a
distance.
Single-family housing lines the frontage roads in the
developed areas.
4-6 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN
STANDARDS
All development shall respect Kearney Boulevard’s
status as a Historic Resource on the Local Register
and as an eligible candidate for the National
Register of Historic Places and in so doing shall
follow any guidelines or requirements set forth
by those registers. The following Development
Standards apply to development within 100 feet of
the property line along Kearney Boulevard in the
Historic Corridor.
■ Street Trees and Landscaping. In keeping
with the historic character, the existing palm
trees shall remain unless they are causing a
health or safety threat. New development shall
plant new palm trees, eucalyptus trees, and
oleander bushes along Kearney Boulevard in
keeping with the historic tree pattern to fill in
gaps when trees and landscaping are missing
along front property lines. Eucalyptus trees
are not exempt from the Tree Removal Permit
along this corridor.
■ Frontage Road Configuration. All development
shall continue the historic configuration of the
boulevard with frontage roads on either side
separated by planted side medians.
■ Building Orientation. All new buildings shall
be oriented toward the Historic Corridor with
front doors facing it.
The residential neighborhoods along Historic Kearney Boulevard’s frontage roads are defined by street trees, front setbacks, and large ranch-style single-family homes facing the boulevard.
The boulevard’s right-of-way includes frontage roads
even in undeveloped areas.
■ Front Setback. All new buildings shall match
the existing front setback of neighboring
properties. If neighboring properties’ permitted
front setbacks vary, new building shall match
the setback of the majority of buildings on the
block.
■ Walls and Fences. Front fences shall be a
maximum of 3 feet in height and shall be
either: 1) made of wrought iron or tubular
steel and open a minimum of 80 percent (e.g.,
no more than 20 percent opaque) to allow
for the passage of light and air; or 2) a picket
fence made of wood and open a minimum
of 50 percent (e.g., no more than 50 percent
opaque). Walls and fences that do not meet
this description are not permitted within the
required front yard setback.
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-7
41 41
180
99 99
REGIONAL
RETAIL MAGNET
REGIONAL
RETAIL CORRIDOR
KEARNEY
BOULEVARD
HISTORIC
CORRIDOR
OVERLAY
CALIFORNIA AVE
MIXED-USE
CORRIDOR
OVERLAY
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE MAGNET
JOBS
CORRIDOR
MIXED-USE/
JOBS
CORRIDOR
NMX
NMX
O
O
O
O
R O
G
CMX
CMX CMX
C C
C
PB
PB
PB
PB
PB PBP PB
PB
PB
P
CP
CP
NP
NP
NP
NP
RP
A
PG&E
HOSP
E
M
PB
PB
C
E
R C
NP*
NP*
E
C
NP
NP
E
M
NC
WR
NC
PBP
PF
PF
PF
C
NMX
C C
P
R
CZ
CMX
CMX
CMX
NMX
PF
OS OS
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
WALNUT AVE
FRUIT AVE
ELM AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
FIGURE 4-1 Land Uses with Overlays, Special Corridors, Magnet Cores, & Neighborhood Nodes Overlay 100 feet from the
Property Line along Corridor
Street
RESIDENTIAL
EMPLOYMENT MIXED-USE OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC FACILITIES
COMMERCIAL
O Office P Park
CZ Clear Zone
NP Neighborhood Park
CP Community Park
RP Regional Park
PB Ponding Basin
PBP Ponding Basin Park
Neighborhood Park* NP*
CMX Corridor/Center Mixed-Use
NMX Neighborhood Mixed-Use C College
E Elementary School
PF Public Facility
M Middle School
A Airport
HOSP Hospital
NC Neighborhood Center
PG&E PG&E Station
Water Recharge
Basin
WR
R Regional
C Community
*The exact location of the parks within the
Mission Ranch development will be
determined in a future planning process.
Medium Density (5 - 12 du/ac)
Medium-high Density (12 - 16 du/ac)
Urban Neighborhood (16 - 30 du/ac)
Medium-low Density (3.5 - 6 du/ac)
Low Density (1 - 3.5 du/ac)
Plan Area City Limit Sphere of Influence
G General
OS Open Space
¼-mile from Complete
Neighborhood Nodes
Magnet Core Area
Special Corridors
Source: City of Fresno
FIGURE 4-1 Land Uses with Overlays, Special Corridors, Magnet Cores, & Neighborhood Nodes 4-8 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Wide sidewalks, pedestrian-scaled lighting, and varied
storefronts and building entries activate mixed-use streets.
Multifamily residential facing the street.
D. CALIFORNIA AVENUE
MIXED-USE CORRIDOR
OVERLAY
PURPOSE
California Avenue runs east-west through the
Plan Area connecting to Downtown Fresno.
The mixed-use corridor overlay is intended to
encourage a mix of uses along the bus rapid
transit (BRT) corridor. As a transit corridor, it
shall be developed with active uses that provide
jobs and services; development shall create a
pleasant walkable environment so people using
transit can easily get from place to place.
USES
The California Avenue Mixed-Use Corridor Overlay
includes the following abutting land uses (base
zoning):
Corridor/Center Mixed-Use (CMX)
■ Urban Neighborhood Residential (RM-2)
■ Medium Density Residential (RS-5)
■ Medium-low Density Residential (RS-4)
■ Public and Institutional (PI)
■ Parks and Recreation (PR)
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN
STANDARDS
■ Residential Building Orientation. Where new
residential uses are built along the corridor,
residences shall face the corridor.
■ Walls. Walls are not permitted within the
required front yard setback nor between
residential uses and California Avenue.
Single-family residential facing the street without walls.
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-9
E. OBJECTIVES FOR
SPECIAL CORRIDORS,
MAGNET CORES,
AND COMPLETE
NEIGHBORHOODS
As Southwest Fresno grows and introduces more
types of development into the area, regulating its
urban form will be an important aspect to ensuring quality development that fosters a vibrant, convenient, safe, and healthy environment. Urban
form is the term used to describe the design and
character of an urban environment; urban form
is governed by development standards in the
Citywide Development Code, including standards
for building heights, spacing between buildings,
whether they face the street or a parking lot, and
how many doors and windows they have. Chapter
2, the Vision Chapter, introduced how the Plan
Area will be developed around corridors, magnet
cores, and complete neighborhoods. The following
sections describe the objectives of these areas in
more detail. These objectives are conceptual and
are not standards or requirements.
The Complete Street Guidelines in Chapter 5
illustrate the necessary streetscape improvements
to enhance the public realm of these corridors,
magnet cores, and complete neighborhood nodes,
including sidewalks, crossings, bicycle facilities,
transit, streetscape amenities, and green infrastructure. All public right-of-way guidelines are addressed in Chapter 5.
CORRIDORS
In addition to the Kearney Boulevard Historic Corridor Overlay and the California Boulevard MixedUse Overlay, three special corridors were identified as key streets with their own distinct character in
the Vision for Southwest Fresno (Chapter 2). They
are lined with higher, more concentrated development types and/or have multimodal improvements such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities.
The urban form along these special corridors will
be defined by the area’s most intensive and tallest
developments, especially in areas with mixed-use
buildings. Development along these special corridors will be compact to create a dynamic, transitand pedestrian-friendly atmosphere. Buildings and their main entrances will be oriented towards the
street.
Each corridor’s objective is described in the following sections; their locations are noted in Figure 4-1.
Each corridor shall be prioritized as a complete
street, as described in Chapter 5’s Complete Streets
Design Guidelines section.
New, high-quality development will have a variety of stores, architectural features, landscaping, and lighting. 4-10 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Regional Retail Corridor Objective
The Regional Retail Corridor is located along Whites
Bridge Avenue for almost the entire length of the
Plan Area, starting five parcels east of Valentine
Avenue and ending at Roeding Drive. It is the area
with the greatest opportunity to create a regional
retail center given its proximity to the Highway 180
and Marks Avenue interchange. Because it will be
a regional draw, the Regional Retail Corridor will
accommodate regional traffic and be well-signed.
Given the anticipated housing and office along the
corridor, the uses along the corridor will be developed to provide easy pedestrian access between developments and to the public right-of-way.
Mixed-Use/Jobs Corridor Objective
A Mixed-Use/Jobs Corridor along Elm Avenue
running north-south through the Plan Area from
Downtown Fresno is intended to encourage a lively
mix of uses with an emphasis on employment
uses. The Mixed-Use/Jobs Corridor Elm Avenue will
benefit from a future BRT line or enhanced transit
service connecting Downtown to the southern
portion of the Plan Area, and California Avenue BRT
along the way, as well as the existing Class II bike
lanes along the corridor. Development will create
an environment that invites pedestrian activity. In
areas where residential uses are in close proximity
to commercial uses, development will be designed
to be compatible.
Jobs Corridors Objective
A Jobs Corridors is identified as an employment focus area along Jensen Avenue throughout the Plan Area, connecting the heart of Southwest Fresno
to Highway 41. These corridors will be Southwest
Fresno’s employment areas and will be home to
office uses, services, and non-industrial employers. Development will include Class I bike paths, as described in Chapter 5’s section on Bicycles &
Trails, to allow people to bike to work and access
commercial services before and after work.
An office complex wraps around an open space area
and includes amenities such as seating and pedestrianscaled lighting.
A mixed-use building with ground-floor retail facing
the street, bicycle parking, and upper story balconies
encourage pedestrian activity.
Landscaped shoping center parking lot with designated
pedestrian sidewalk and lighting.
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-11
MAGNET CORES
As described in the Vision for Southwest Fresno
(Chapter 2), magnet cores are home to high
intensity uses that attract other supporting higher
intensity uses. There are two magnets within the
Plan Area: 1) A Regional Retail Magnet Core is centered between Whites Bridge Avenue and Highway 180; and 2) A Community College Magnet Core is
centered on the parcels between Church Avenue,
Walnut Avenue, Jensen Avenue, and Martin Luther
King Jr. Boulevard focused on a college and associated mix of uses.
Regional Retail Magnet Core Objective
The Regional Retail Magnet Core is envisioned as
Southwest Fresno’s regional retail center. Taking
advantage of the proximity to the Whites Bridge
Avenue exit on Highway 180, this magnet core will
not only attract shoppers from Southwest Fresno,
but also regional shoppers via Highway 180. It is
targeted for the highest concentration of regional
retail uses.
Community College Magnet Core
Objective
The Community College Magnet Core is envisioned
to be a hub of new activity in the area of Southwest
Fresno referred to as the “MLK Activity Center.”
The community has a preference to see this area
become a community college campus with a mix
of adjacent uses to support it, including housing and commercial. It could also be a hub for medical facilities or a combination of compatible
high-activity magnet uses. This magnet core is
envisioned to be similar in character to the MixedUse Corridor because of its mix of active land uses and pedestrian environment. The new campus,
whether it is educational or medical, will be the
heart of this magnet. Like the special corridors, the
urban form around this magnet core will be defined
by the area’s most intensive and tallest developments. Development will be compact to create a dynamic, transit village atmosphere. Buildings and
their entrances will be oriented towards the street
or public open spaces and be complemented by a
pedestrian-friendly atmosphere.
Shopping center with entryway, pedestrian plaza,
lighting, attractive materials, and signage.
A community college campus with central open space
linked to pedestrian pathways, academic buildings, and
the neighborhood.
Source: Atomic Taco
A medical campus with landscaping and quality
architectural features.
4-12 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
F. CRIME PREVENTION
THROUGH
ENVIRONMENTAL
DESIGN
Urban form impacts how people interact with
public spaces, affects their sense of safety and
security in the public realm, and encourages or
discourages how they get around, among many
other behaviors. As Southwest Fresno is developed,
streets, parks, and buildings should be designed
using the principles of Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design (CPTED). CPTED is a crime
prevention philosophy based on the theory that
the proper design and effective use of the built
environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and
incidence of crime, as well as an improvement in
the quality of life. CPTED is a process and a way of
thinking about crime. It is not a program or system
of ready-made solutions. CPTED emphasizes understanding and changing the physical environment in an effort to reduce crime at particular locations.
CPTED is effective because of the concept of
“defensible space”. This concept suggests that all
space in the human environment is defendable;
a guardian can take responsibility for the space
and take action to defend it from non-legitimate,
criminal, or unintended use. To help defend a location, there are four overlapping CPTED strategies that need to be employed: 1) Natural Surveillance,
2) Territorial Reinforcement, 3) Access Control, and
4) Maintenance. The Citywide Development Code
enforces each of these strategies.
COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS
OBJECTIVE
Development further away from magnet cores and
corridors will consist of lower-intensity complete
neighborhoods. These complete neighborhoods
will have housing, services, employment, and
recreation all within walking distance. Although
smaller in scale, development at the heart of each
complete neighborhood will still be compact to
allow residents to reach commercial services and
public facilities in a walkable, pedestrian-friendly
environment. Rather than large retail establishments, each neighborhood will have small commercial establishments to provide services to their community.
As Southwest Fresno transitions from its agricultural and industrial roots, residential neighborhoods will be designed in a manner that supports health
and wellness. It is essential to develop complete
neighborhoods that include an efficient and diverse
mix of residential densities, building types, and affordability. The communities will be designed to be healthy, attractive, and centered by schools, parks,
and public and commercial services to provide a
sense of place and provide as many services as possible within walking distance. At the heart of each neighborhood will be a cluster of commercial uses,
parks, and schools located to serve the surrounding
residents. These neighborhood nodes located at
key intersections will be visible, accessible, and
inviting to passersby traveling on foot, bike, bus, or
private vehicle (see Figure 4-1).
Houses looking over a neighborhood park and
pedestrian crossings put more eyes on the public realm.
Neighborhood-serving retail with trees, landscaping,
lighting, small public plaza, and pedestrian zones will be in every complete neighborhood node.
Chapter 4 | Development Regulations 4-13
NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
Design buildings and open space so they are in
view of residents, workers, shoppers, and passersby. Putting more eyes on the street provides natural surveillance. Place physical features,
activities, and people in locations that maximize
the ability to see what is occurring in a given space.
Properly trim and maintain landscaping to allow for
visibility. Scale lighting for the pedestrian environment. Site new fire and police stations adjacent to parks, trails, and schools.
TERRITORIAL REINFORCEMENT
Design spaces that clearly define boundaries and
ownership. Define as public, private, or semipublic/semi-private. Install low decorative fencing around the semi-private outdoor patio of a business. Install proper signage that communicates the ownership of a space and the rules of its use.
ACCESS CONTROL
Design physical controls to limit physical movement
to and from a space; use strategic placement of
entrances, exits, fencing, landscaping, locks, and
other barriers. Design well-marked pedestrian
pathways through parking lots to give direction to
its users, and create a safer path of travel by alerting drivers to pedestrian zones. Place bollards near the entrance of a park to prevent vehicle entry but
allow pedestrian entry.
MAINTENANCE
Ensure the upkeep of an area or building over time
to demonstrate that someone cares about a space,
is watching, and will defend the property against
crime.
Outdoor dining, clear pedestrian zone, and well-kept
sidewalk signal that this area is looked after.
Pedestrian pathways through parking areas help people
feel safer walking to destinations.
Housing overlooking a neighborhood park can provide
natural surveillance.
4-14 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-1
TRANSPORTATION
A. INTRODUCTION
Since Southwest Fresno has a relatively low level
of development, there is significant opportunity
for future transportation improvements. Currently,
Southwest Fresno’s patchwork pattern of development, with residential neighborhoods separated by vacant or agricultural lands, has created a
sporadic street infrastructure network. This has
led to disconnected neighborhoods in the Plan
Area and transportation inefficiencies. To increase
mobility within the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Area (Plan Area), transportation improvements for
various modes of travel are critical to improve the
convenience and facilitation of how people travel
within and beyond Southwest Fresno. Improvements to the transportation network will not only help bring existing Southwest Fresno neighborhoods up to par with the rest of the city, but will also serve future anticipated development and
residents in Southwest Fresno.
This chapter describes proposed improvements to
the transportation network in Southwest Fresno to
support all modes of travel, including transit, active
forms of transportation like walking and biking,
automobile, and goods movement. Considering all
modes of travel for Southwest Fresno will enable
a comprehensive and balanced network of streets
that thoughtfully considers traffic congestion,
greenhouse gas emissions, and the abilities of all
users of the transportation network.
The Chapter is organized into the following
sections:
A. Introduction
B. Transportation Improvements
C. Complete Streets Design Guidelines
D. Goals and Policies
5 5-2 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Existing sidewalk with street trees.
Inconsistent sidewalks in a Southwest Fresno
neighborhood.
B. TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
This section describes the existing, planned, and
recommended improvements to the transportation
network in Southwest Fresno. Planned improvements are referenced from completed plans, including the Fresno General Plan (General Plan),
the Fresno Active Transportation Plan (ATP), and
the Highway 41 + North Corridor Complete Streets
Plan.
PEDESTRIAN
The Plan Area has inconsistent sidewalks; they are
most notably absent in undeveloped areas and on
streets that transition between the City of Fresno
and the unincorporated County (see Figure 5-1).
Inconsistent sidewalks can limit neighborhood access and walkability. The Fresno ATP identifies one “underserved neighborhood” within the Plan Area
that lacks sidewalks (see Figure 5-1). Since this area
is considered a “high priority area,” the City should
prioritize implementing sidewalk infrastructure and
improvements in these neighborhoods to improve
pedestrian travel.
The Fresno ATP also prioritizes sidewalk improvements on arterials and collectors with land uses and socioeconomic characteristics that generate
higher pedestrian travel demand. Currently, there
is a lack of sidewalks along the Plan’s proposed
major corridors (Whites Bridge Avenue, California
Avenue west of West Avenue, and Jensen Avenue),
notably in areas that are undeveloped. As development occurs in areas around corridors, and within magnet cores and complete neighborhoods,
continuous and wide sidewalks should be implemented accordingly to provide pedestrian access and create a pedestrian-friendly environment.
These improvements are described in detail in the
next section (Complete Streets Design Guidelines).
Lesser pedestrian improvements (i.e. standard
sidewalks) should be provided on other roadways
between magnet cores and along routes with less
pedestrian demand.
The recently completed Highway 41 + North
Corridor Complete Streets Plan proposes several pedestrian improvements in the Plan Area’s underserved neighborhood identified in the Fresno
ATP, including:
■ High-visibility crosswalks at Martin Luther King
Jr. Boulevard, South Clara Avenue (recently
installed), and South Elm Avenue along North
Avenue
■ A pedestrian activated signal (i.e., pedestrian
hybrid beacon) at the intersection of North and
South Clara Avenues
■ A temporary asphalt sidewalk on the south side
of North Avenue between Martin Luther King
Jr. Boulevard and South Elm Avenue
■ A completed sidewalk network, particularly
on North Avenue, South Clara Avenue, Martin
Luther King Jr. Boulevard, South Ivy Avenue,
and East Annadale Avenue
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-3
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-1 Existing and Planned Sidewalk Network
Existing Sidewalk
Missing Sidewalk
Underserved Neighborhood/
Priority Pedestrian Area within
Plan Area
Source: City of Fresno; 2017 Fresno Active Transportation Plan FIGURE 5-1 Existing and Planned Sidewalk Network
5-4 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Jogger using a frontage road as a running trail along
Kearney Boulevard.
In addition to sidewalk infrastructure, measures
that improve the walking experience and address
pedestrian accessibility and walkability should
be encouraged throughout the Plan Area. These
improvements may include, but are not limited to:
high-visibility crosswalks, curb bulbouts, trees, and
landscaping to provide shade and buffer between
sidewalks and higher speed traffic, rectangular
rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), and pedestrian
hybrid beacons (PHBs), where applicable (such
as at uncontrolled crosswalks between signalized
intersections in high pedestrian activity areas).
These types of improvements are particularly
important near schools, parks, and shopping areas,
within magnet cores, along transit corridors, and
on the high intensity corridors where pedestrian
activity is greatest. In these areas, traffic calming
measures should be implemented to reduce travel
speeds, which will reduce collision frequency
and severity. These are discussed further in the
Complete Streets Design Guidelines section later in
this chapter.
BICYCLE AND TRAILS
The Plan Area has a very limited bicycle and trail
network, which in turn does not support bicycling
as an alternative to vehicle travel. There are a few
bike lanes in the east-west direction, but they run
in short segments and are often discontinuous. The
Plan Area has one continuous bike lane along Elm
Avenue, which connects to the bicycle network in
Downtown Fresno. “Trails” as described within this
Plan refer to Class I bike paths, which are multi-use
pathways separated from vehicle traffic and shared
between bicyclists and pedestrians. Currently,
there are no existing trails within the Plan Area; just outside of the Plan Area, there is an existing trail
along Kearney Boulevard west of Brawley Avenue
to Kearney Park.
The Fresno ATP, which incorporates recommendations from the General Plan, recommends a bikeway system that is primarily comprised of Class
II bike lanes and follows the natural grid network
of arterial and collector streets within the Plan
Area (see Figure 5-2). Descriptions of the different
classes of bikeways can be found on page 5-24 in
the Complete Streets Design Guidelines section.
The provision of Class II bike lanes on every arterial
within the Plan Area would create a well-connected
bicycle network and provide continuous travel
through complete neighborhoods, within magnet
cores, and along corridors. Bicycle facilities should
be prioritized along corridors and other streets that
provide connections to high intensity activity areas.
The Fresno ATP also indicates that planned Class II
bike lanes could be considered for Class IV treatment during the project development phases. The ongoing Fresno Council of Governments’ Separated
Bikeway Feasibility Study may identify additional
corridors for Class IV implementation.
The recently completed Highway 41 + North
Corridor Complete Streets Plan proposes buffered
bike lanes on either side of the street along North
Avenue, focused between Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard and Elm Avenue (see Figure 5-3 taken
from the Highway 41 + North Complete Streets
Corridor Plan). Planned future right-of-way (ROW)
expansion can also accommodate this improvement when the existing roadway is widened. The City is preparing an official plan line for North
Existing Class II bike lane in Southwest Fresno.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-5
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
HUGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-2 Existing and Planned Bicycle and Trail Network Existing Class I
(Multi-Use Trail)
Existing Class II
Existing Class III
Planned Class I Priority Bikeways
(Multi-Use Trail)
Planned Class II
Planned Class III
Planned Class IV
Sources: City of Fresno; 2017 Fresno Active Transportation Plan; Fresno General Plan Figure MT-2 Path and Trails (2017) FIGURE 5-2 Existing and Planned Bicycle and Trail Network 5-6 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Avenue to establish the long-term ROW, which will
determine which existing property lines will require
assessment for potential parcel acquisition. Figure
5-3 shows planned long-term improvements for
North Avenue, which includes buffered bike lanes
on both sides of the street, no on-street parking,
two travel lanes, a center two-way left-turn lane,
and a wide sidewalk on the south side of the North
Avenue. This improvement was reflected in the
Fresno ATP, designating North Avenue as a Class II
facility.
The proposed Class I bike paths/multi-use trails in
Figure 5-2 were identified in the Fresno ATP and
recently amended General Plan Path and Trails
Map. These separated bikeways provide more
attractive facilities for the greater population, and
are particularly beneficial along major corridors
and connecting magnet cores where traffic volume
is anticipated to be greatest. Proposed Class I trails
in the Plan Area are included along arterials, such
as Marks, Jensen, and North Avenues, as well as
pathways along irrigation canals that travel in a
diagonal direction across the Plan Area. The canal
pathways provide a more scenic and low-traffic
option for travel. Trails along the canals connect
to the east-west and north-south trails system to
provide continuity and access to major destinations. For the trail along Jensen Avenue (the Jobs Corridor), it is recommended that the location of
the separated pathway not conflict with proposed
office development, associated office service
activities (e.g., loading and unloading), and high
intensity traffic. For example and if appropriate, the
separated pathway could be a parallel pathway on
private office development.
TRANSIT
Due to the Plan Area’s limited development, not
all of the Plan Area is served by fixed route Fresno
Area Express (FAX) bus transit. Existing transit lines
are focused around existing residential neighborhoods and provide connections to Downtown (see Figure 5-4). However, there are a few residential
neighborhoods that are not within walking distance
of a transit line such as the neighborhood west of
Marks Avenue and north Kearney Boulevard, as
well as the neighborhood north of North Avenue
and west of Walnut Avenue. It should also be noted
that the current FAX service does not provide access to the Plan Area’s regional park, the Regional Sports Complex.
Source: 2016 Highway 41 + North Corridor Complete Streets Plan FIGURE 5-3 North Avenue Long-term Alternative Cross Section: Class II Buffered Bike Lanes Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-7
1 3
2 2
2 2
1 3
180
99 99
41 41
MAGNET
MAGNET
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE ST
G ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
T
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-4 Existing and Potential Transit Routes
Existing FAX Routes
Other FAX Routes
30 32
34 38
Recommended Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridors
1 2
3 Planned BRT Corridor per Fresno General Plan
Recommended BRT Corridors per FAX
Recommended BRT Corridor per the Plan
Potential Restructured Routes per FAX
Potential Removal of Existing Route
29 (BRT)
38 31
T
T Transit Center
Other FAX Routes
Sources: City of Fresno; Fresno Area Express (FAX); 2015 FAX Final Service Plan Layout T Future Transit Center with HSR
FIGURE 5-4 Existing and Potential Transit Routes
5-8 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
FAX transit stop with basic amenities in Southwest Fresno.
The General Plan states that Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT) is envisioned on California Avenue connecting Southwest Fresno with Downtown as part of the second phase of BRT implementation. As the
Plan Area becomes more developed, the Plan
recommends that in addition to California Avenue
(the Mixed-Use Corridor), transit service should
be prioritized on the other proposed high intensity
corridors, which include Whites Bridge Avenue,
Church Avenue, and Elm Avenue, in order to
provide better access between existing and new
residential areas to employment, retail, and commercial uses. The Plan recommends that enhanced transit services also be implemented along Elm
Avenue to provide an improved connection for
commuters between Elm Avenue’s anticipated
office uses to and from Downtown, the FAX bus
terminal, and the High-Speed Rail (HSR) station.
Transit routes should also be considered on connecting streets between the major corridors and activity centers such as supermarkets, commercial
areas, and employment areas. Additional transit
routes would need to be provided and connect
to magnet cores and Downtown. There could be
potential for a local transit circulator connecting
areas of higher density within Southwest Fresno,
in addition to the existing transit service that
connects Southwest Fresno’s magnet cores with
Downtown Fresno. There could be a potential
transit center linking multiple transit routes at one
or more of the magnet cores.
Additional service locations are established
through a public process as defined by the Federal
Transportation Administration under Title VI. FAX
will undergo this type of planning effort in spring
or summer of 2017 to restructure routes, extend
night service, and extend weekend service with
the intention of adding more neighborhood-based
services in areas west of Highway 99, including
Southwest Fresno. FAX recently prepared a potential restructured service plan layout for better enhanced and more reliable service. Figure 5-4
shows FAX’s potential routes compared to existing
FAX service, which includes new BRT service along
Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard from Jensen
Avenue to the northern boundary of the Plan
Area. This BRT line would serve the MLK Activity
Center to its west. The Plan proposes to maintain
FAX service along C and Santa Clara Streets so that
the recommended enhanced transit service along
Elm Avenue can continue south connecting to
Downtown. As the Plan Area develops, regular and
rapid transit routes within Southwest Fresno should
be routinely evaluated to consider whether any
routes should be rerouted and/or expanded to link
existing and new residential areas to existing and
new commercial, employment, parks, and public
facility uses.
VEHICLES
Southwest Fresno’s existing low traffic volumes
allow more opportunities for streets to accommodate additional traffic from future development within the current roadway ROW. There is also
opportunity to potentially repurpose additional
roadway ROW from existing streets, especially in
undeveloped areas, to provide bicycle, pedestrian,
and transit facilities.
The General Plan proposed several roadway widenings to the Plan Area’s existing roadway network and the completed Highway 41 + North Corridor
Complete Streets Plan also proposes roadway
modifications for North Avenue from Martin Luther
King Jr. Boulevard to Elm Avenue to have two travel
lanes with a center turning lane. These planned
roadway improvements are reflected in Figure 5-5.
Based on the Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (GP MEIR) and the Highway Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-9
Existing Number of Lanes
1 2
3 4
MAGNET
MAGNET
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-5 Existing and Planned Number of Roadway Lanes Number of Roadway Lanes*
1 Lane
2 Lanes
3 Lanes
4 Lanes
Potential additional roadway lanes; four or six lanes may be required for Regional Retail Corridor
1 1
2 3
2 2
2 3
Potential additional roadway lanes for key connections
near magnet cores
Potential reduction in roadway lanes (to two lanes) on
Mixed-Use Corridor
Sources: City of Fresno; 2035 Fresno General Plan
Southwest Fresno Specific Plan’s Proposed Modifications *Based on Fresno General Plan (i.e., Figure MT-1) and Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report Analysis
FIGURE 5-5 Existing and Planned Number of Roadway Lanes 5-10 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
41 + North Corridor Complete Streets Plan, the
following roadways within the Plan Area are to be
widened to four lanes:
§ California Avenue: Fruit Avenue to Martin
Luther King Jr. Boulevard
§ Jensen Avenue: Marks Avenue to Martin
Luther King Jr. Boulevard
§ North Avenue: Elm Avenue to SR 41
§ Marks Avenue: Whites Bridge Avenue to
Jensen Avenue
§ Roeding Drive: Whites Bridge Avenue to
Kearney Boulevard
§ Walnut Avenue: California Avenue to Jensen
Avenue
In addition to these proposed improvements, the
Plan recommends a few additional or alternative improvements to accommodate the Plan’s proposed development patterns and capacity.
Figure 5-5 shows the Plan’s recommendations to
key streets within the Plan Area, which are also
described below:
■ Additional roadway lanes may be required
on the Regional Retail Corridor along Whites
Bridge Avenue compared to the planned
number of lanes identified in the GP MEIR. The
GP MEIR shows a planned two-lane roadway
(one lane each direction) on Whites Bridge
Avenue, and instead, four or six lanes could
be needed depending on the intensity of the
regional retail.
■ Additional roadway lanes for key connections
near magnet cores may be necessary, such
as along Hughes Avenue around the Regional
Retail Magnet Core and along Walnut Avenue
and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard around
the Community College Magnet Core.
■ A complete streets approach is recommended
for all of the Plan’s identified corridors. Existing
and planned four-lane facilities and could
instead be reduced to two lanes if additional
capacity is provided on parallel facilities.
There may be opportunities for fewer roadway
lanes in areas further away from magnet cores
than the planned number of lanes identified in the
GP MEIR. Also, depending on the exact locations
of magnet uses, the magnet use’s entrances, and
where the most intensive traffic-generating uses
are concentrated, the number of lanes required on
roadways within the Plan Area may differ slightly
from the other planned number of lanes identified
in the GP MEIR. [Note: All of the above changes in
roadway lanes will be confirmed once Fehr & Peers
runs their traffic model for the EIR. Therefore,
these descriptions will be subject to change.]
TRUCKS
With the significant amount of industrial uses
situated within Southwest Fresno, multiple truck
routes pass directly through existing residential
areas. The frequent truck traffic reduces comfort
levels for residents, especially for pedestrians and
bicyclists who share the roadway with truck drivers.
Figure 5-6 shows a map of existing truck routes
that pass through the Plan Area and the existing
industrial uses within the Plan Area and Sphere of
Influence (SOI) that these routes serve. Existing
residential areas are also shown on the map to
highlight the proximity of truck traffic to many
existing residential neighborhoods in Southwest
Fresno. Existing truck routes are located along city
and county streets.
The Plan recommends the rerouting of existing
truck routes that pass through large swaths of existing residential neighborhoods. These eliminated routes should be rerouted to street segments that
do not or minimally intersect existing residential
areas, while still providing access and service to
existing industrial businesses. Recommended truck
reroutes are shown in Figure 5-6 and include the
following:
■ The truck route on California Avenue should be
eliminated to avoid existing residential areas
and to provide a more pedestrian-, bicycle-,
and transit-friendly environment along the
Mixed-Use Corridor.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-11
ting Truck Routes
County Permit Route
Existing Truck Route
FUTURE PLANNED TRUCK ROUTE
Existing Industrial Land Use
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
HUGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-6 Existing, Planned, and Recommended Truck Routes Existing Truck Route
Existing Residential Land Use
in Plan Area
Existing Industrial Land Uses Served
by Truck Routes in Southwest Fresno
Recommended Elimination of
Existing Truck Route
Recommended New Truck Route
CARGILL
MEAT SOLUTIONS
BUSSETO
FOODS
FOSTER
POULTRY
FARMS
FRESNO
CHANDLER
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
Source: City of Fresno
FIGURE 5-6 Existing, Planned, and Recommended Truck Routes 5-12 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
■ The truck route on North Avenue should be
eliminated to avoid existing residential areas.
Trucks should be rerouted from Highway 41 to
Central, West, and Fig Avenues. This reroute
is consistent with the recommendation from
the recently completed Highway 41 + North
Corridor Complete Streets Plan.
■ A new or rerouted truck route along Marks
Avenue should be considered to provide a
direct connection from State Route 180 to
existing industrial uses connecting to a new
extended truck route along Church Avenue; the
GP MEIR plans to widen Marks Avenue to have
four lanes of travel.
■ The truck route along Jensen Avenue between
Knight and Elm Avenues should be eliminated
to avoid passing through multiple residential
neighborhoods. Parallel truck routes along
Church and Central Avenues should be used
as an alternative. Jensen Avenue east of Elm
Avenue should remain a truck route so that
trucks can access Highway 41 and the industrial
areas in the “reverse triangle” between
Highways 41 and 99. Jensen Avenue west of
Knight Avenue should remain a truck route to
service existing industrial and future office uses
south of Jensen Avenue.
■ The existing truck route along Elm Avenue
should be extended south to Central Avenue
to serve existing industrial uses and provide
better connectivity between Elm Avenue and
the recommended Central Avenue truck route.
■ A new truck route along Roeding Drive from
Whites Bridge Avenue to Channing Way should
be considered to provide truck service access
to the Fresno Chandler Executive Airport the
GP MEIR plans to widen Roeding Drive to
have four lanes of travel. Establishment of this
truck route is necessary for Fresno Chandler
Executive Airport and the surrounding
businesses.
■ North-south truck routes that connect to
recommended eliminated truck routes, such
as Thorne Avenue, Walnut Avenue, and West
Avenue from California Avenue to Florence
Avenue, should also be eliminated.
The recommended rerouting of truck traffic should
be thoroughly discussed between existing industrial
business stakeholders, existing residents, potentially affected agencies such as County of Fresno and Caltrans, and the City’s traffic engineers. The
recommended streets that would accommodate
new truck traffic should be evaluated to determine
whether the roadway’s current pavement condition
can withstand truck traffic over time and whether
the roadway’s width can accommodate truck
movement.
If it is determined that new truck routes cannot
accommodate these factors, the City should
prioritize the recommended street(s) for the
needed improvements or should determine
sufficient alternative routes that are agreeable
among existing residents, industrial stakeholders,
and agency stakeholders. Since this Plan proposes
to eliminate some existing truck routes, the City
should reconsider any future planned truck routes
that extend or connect to these eliminated truck
routes.
Truck traffic through Southwest Fresno.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-13
C. COMPLETE STREETS
DESIGN GUIDELINES
The following Complete Streets Design Guidelines
aim to create a high-quality pedestrian and bicycle
environment while accommodating vehicle access
needs. They provide direction for the envisioned
character of streets. Implementation of these
Complete Streets Design Guidelines should be
prioritized along streets within magnet cores
and complete neighborhoods, and along special
corridors specified in Chapter 2, Vision, and
Chapter 4, Development Regulations: (1) Regional
Retail Corridor, (2) Mixed-Use Corridor, (3) Jobs
Corridor, and (4) Mixed-Use/Jobs Corridor. Streets
other than these should have a lower priority for
complete streets implementation. These guidelines
may be implemented differently along streets, due
to varying street dimensions, adjacent land use,
and modal priorities. For example, if a corridor is
planned for BRT, complete streets improvements
should focus on transit mobility and pedestrian
access; on the other hand, if a corridor will act as a
key bicycle route, complete streets improvements
should prioritize bicycle facilities. The guidelines
are compatible with the streetscape enhancement
standards contained in the Citywide Development
Code. All improvements will need to be reviewed
and approved by City of Fresno Public Works.
They are categorized into the following categories:
■ Pedestrian
■ Streetscape Amenities
■ Green Infrastructure
■ Bicycle
■ Transit
Sidewalk with street trees in curb zone.
Street with Class II bicycle facilities and a high-visibility crosswalk.
Bulbout with streetscape amenities and furnishings.
5-14 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
PEDESTRIAN
Sidewalks
Wherever possible, existing sidewalks should be
widened through a public easement for pedestrian
purposes on the adjacent private property to
accommodate a throughway zone along with a
curb zone and a frontage zone, as illustrated in
Figure 5-7. This should be accommodated as vacant
parcels are developed and existing buildings are
redeveloped; buildings should be set back from the
back of walk to accommodate the following zones
and widths. New sidewalks should also provide
these three zones and be no less than 12 feet in
width.
■ Throughway Zone. Maintain 5- to 6-foot
minimum pedestrian-through zones that are
completely clear of obstructions (e.g., tree
grates, planters, light poles, etc.) and meet
all applicable Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) regulations. Relocate utility boxes out of
the pedestrian-through zone, where feasible.
For new sidewalks adjacent to residential-only
projects, provide a 7-foot throughway zone
adjacent to the private parcel.
■ Curb Zone. Place street furniture, including
light poles, benches, and trash receptacles, in
the outer 2-foot minimum zone adjacent to the
curb. Landscape strips are also appropriate in
this zone and should be at least 5 feet wide,
and 6 to 8 feet wide where landscaped with
larger trees.
■ Frontage Zone. In areas with mixed-use
development, improve facades of adjacent
commercial buildings with awnings and
other pedestrian-scale enhancements. New
commercial development should be built
close to the property line, with setbacks for
wider throughway zones and frontage zones.
Frontage zones can accommodate sidewalk
cafés, store entrances, retail displays, and/
or landscaping. They are not needed on
low-density, residential streets. Acquire public
access easements on private property to
expand sidewalks and useable pedestrian areas
and/or add street trees and landscaping for
common open space.
Throughway
Zone
Curb Zone for utilities
and street furnishings Curb Zone Throughway
Zone
Frontage
Zone
Frontage
Zone
FIGURE 5-7 Zones on a Sidewalk
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-15
Crossings
All existing and new marked crosswalks should
employ markings consistent with the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). High-visibility crosswalk markings
should be prioritized at uncontrolled locations.
High visibility marking patterns include ladder,
continental, bar pairs, and triple-four markings (see
Figure 5-8). It is recommended that the lines in
these patterns are spaced to avoid the wheel path
of vehicles, since making this minor adjustment will
increase the durability of the markings and reduce
maintenance costs.
Additionally, crosswalks may employ special colors,
markings, and/or materials to create a sense of
place or increase visibility, as long as the crosswalk
is marked consistent with the California MUTCD.
Note that some textured materials may be a
hindrance to people with physical disabilities (e.g.,
people who use in wheelchairs or are blind/visually
impaired).
Stop lines should be placed 3 to 7 feet in advance
of crosswalks at controlled intersections to reduce
occurrences of drivers encroaching into the
crosswalks. Additional space may be required to accommodate special bicycle intersection treatment, such as bike boxes.
Turning lanes and inside travel lanes may be
narrowed to 10 feet, while outside travel lanes may
be narrowed to 11 feet in width where feasible
to facilitate the provision of curb bulbouts, and
bicycle facilities.
High-visibility Crosswalk Locations
In addition to the existing marked crosswalks in the
Plan Area, new high-visibility crosswalks should be
considered to improve pedestrian accessibility and
mobility. The following should be considered when
identifying new crosswalk locations:
Signalized Intersections
■ All signalized intersections along the corridor
should include high-visibility crosswalks. If
an intersection in the Plan Area becomes
signalized in the future, high-visibility
crosswalks should be provided.
Continental marked crosswalk.
LADDER MARKED CROSSWALK
TRIPLE-FOUR MARKED CROSSWALK
BAR PAIR MARKED CROSSWALK
CONTINENTAL MARKED CROSSWALK
1’-0” to 2’-0”
1’-0” to 2’-0”
Stripe
1’-0” to 5’-0”
Spacing Spacings should not exceed
2.5 times stripe width
6’-0”
Min.
1’-0” to 2’-0”
Stripe
1’-0” to 5’-0”
Spacing
6’-0”
Min.
2’-0”
Stripe
2’-0” Min.
Spacing
4’-0”
Consider aligning negative
spaces with car wheel base
to reduce maintenance
needs
4’-0”
4’-0”
0’-8”
Stripe
0’-8”
Spacing
2’-0” to 5’0”
Spacing
FIGURE 5-8 High-visibility Crosswalk Types
5-16 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Uncontrolled Intersections
■ At uncontrolled locations, a marked crosswalk
may be considered if the following conditions
exist:
§ There is sufficient pedestrian activity and
demand to cross the corridor. This typically
would be about 20 pedestrians per hour.
§ It is a convenient location to cross with
excellent visibility.
§ Drivers are aware of the pedestrian crossing.
§ A transportation engineer determines
that a marked crosswalk would provide an
improved crossing over unmarked crosswalk
conditions.
■ Heavy and fast-moving traffic conditions may
indicate that providing only a marked crosswalk
at an uncontrolled location may be insufficient
along the corridor. If a marked crosswalk at
an uncontrolled intersection is warranted,
RRFBs should be considered as a minimum
improvement. PHBs should also be considered
as an option to increase driver awareness of
the crosswalk. At uncontrolled crosswalks (e.g.,
mid-block crossings), advanced yield limit lines
should be provided 20 to 50 feet in advance of
the crosswalk to notify drivers to slow down
as they approach the upcoming crossing.
These suggested improvements are subject to
approval by the City of Fresno Public Works
Department.
■ Areas with higher levels of pedestrian activity
that may be candidates for new crosswalks at
uncontrolled locations include:
§ Near high-use transit stops/stations not
adjacent to a signalized intersection
§ Along a walking route to a school
§ Near major activity centers such as
retail, offices, schools, parks, complete
neighborhood nodes, and magnet cores
■ In addition, marked crosswalks at uncontrolled
locations should employ California MUTCD
compliant signage to increase driver awareness
to the crosswalk’s presence.
Marked crosswalk using different pavement materials.
Signalized crosswalk with decorative paving to enhance
visibility and neighborhood character.
Advanced “shark teeth” yield line before a pedestrian
crossing.
GR FIX
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-17
Additional Crossing Improvement
■ Curb Bulbouts. Curb bulbouts should be
installed on corridor intersections with
crosswalks where feasible to increase
pedestrian visibility and shorten crossing
distances, as well as provide space for street
trees, landscaping, and street furniture, such as
bike racks and benches. Curb bulbouts should
be closely coordinated with adjacent bicycle
facility design to ensure adequate space is
provided for bicyclists.
STREETSCAPE AMENITIES
■ Lighting. Energy-efficient street light poles
and pedestrian lights (e.g., solar, LED) should
be consistently spaced every 20 to 30 feet to
provide sufficient lighting for pedestrians on
the sidewalk and bicyclists in the street; they
should alternate with street trees.
§ Where the sidewalk is adjacent to the street,
pedestrian lights should be attached to the
street light poles.
§ Where the sidewalk is separated from the
street, pedestrian lights should be installed
as separate units every 20 to 30 feet.
§ Lighting on alleys should be incorporated
and coordinated with the adjacent property
owners to ensure improved visibility and light
pollution is avoided.
§ Up-lighting of trees in medians and
on sidewalks should be considered in
pedestrian-oriented areas for additional
visibility and beautification purposes.
■ Themed Banners. Banners that emphasize the
identity of a corridor and/or the surrounding
neighborhoods should be attached to the
street light poles to unify those areas. These
banners should be designed with the input of
the community and neighborhood schools and
organizations. The process by which designs
are chosen and replaced should be established
prior to the design selection. The location and
content of banners should be approved by the
City’s Department of Public Works.
Energy-efficient street lights.
Themed banners attached to street light poles.
5-18 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
■ Parklets. Parklets should be considered in
areas with high-pedestrian activity and/or
eating establishments to provide additional
public space for gathering.
§ Parklets can take up one to two on-street
parking spaces, are built at the level of the
sidewalk, and offer seating, landscaping, and
additional amenities by extending the street
furniture/curb zone.
§ Parklet designs should include sustainable
furnishings and plantings that are lacking on
a block (e.g., seating areas on a block where
there are not sufficient benches or bus stops,
or landscaping on a block where there is little
sidewalk space for landscaping).
§ Parklets should be designed with the
neighboring business owners and users
to ensure the design is compatible and
desirable for the community.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
■ Landscaping and Street Trees. Plant street
trees to provide shade for pedestrians on
sidewalks, reduce the heat island effect, and
beautify the street. Space trees 20 to 30 feet
apart in between street lights. If trees are
planted in bulb-outs or a parking lane, they
should be spaced to allow for parking stalls in
between. Install tree grates that are flush with
the sidewalk to protect the trees’ roots and are
not tripping hazards.
■ Plant Selection. All trees and landscaping
should be plant drought-tolerant species that
are appropriate for the site and the climate.
§ Invasive Species. Always avoid invasive
species; California Invasive Plant Council’s
(CAL-IPC’s) “Don’t Plant a Pest” list for the
Central Valley should be used as a reference.
§ Irrigation. Selecting native and low-wateruse species will reduce the need for irrigation and increase the species probability of
survival. The majority of California native and
climate-adapted plants do not like overhead
water in the summer; where necessary, low
volume irrigation systems should be installed
Parklet acting as an extension of the sidewalk to provide more seating.
Street tree bulbout in an angled parking lane.
Landscaped median with low planting and street trees.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-19
with weather-based or soil-based controllers,
with a rain-sensing shutoff device, and
recycled water should be utilized where
possible.
§ Root System. Appropriate tree selection is
important to ensure tree health and avoid
damage to the surrounding hardscape with
large root systems.
■ Plant Height. Consider sightlines and
groundcover/shrub heights. When planting
along the roadway, consider the full maturity
of the plant and provide sufficient setbacks
to avoid conflict with pedestrian, bicycle, and
vehicle circulation. Plants within sightline
zones should grow no higher than 24 inches
at maturity. Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design (CPTED) principles
encourage visual corridors to be maintained
throughout the public realm. Groundcovers
and shrubs should be maintained to remain
below 36 inches, and tree canopies should be
maintained to be above head height (7 feet
above ground).
■ Additional Landscape Improvements. Look
for opportunities for additional planting and
drought-tolerant street trees in the medians,
furnishing zone of widened sidewalks, bulbouts, and parking lanes. Partner with adjacent land owners and Tree Fresno to increase
the urban canopy and beautify the area by
planting trees and additional drought-tolerant
landscape improvements on private property.
■ Biofiltration Features. Rain gardens in the
diagonal curb banks and curb bulbouts, as
well as narrow biofiltration trenches along
the sidewalk, are an effective way to treat
stormwater runoff and reduce the heat island
effect. Constructing these elements in the
streetscape introduces plants to capture the
stormwater pollutants and allows for the
water to infiltrate through the soil and into the
groundwater below, rather than flow directly
into storm drains and into Fresno’s rivers and
streams. These areas also provide space to
plant street trees. Hardscape should be graded
to drain toward these treatment areas.
Landscaping as biofiltration feature.
■ Permeable Pavement. Consider installing
permeable paving materials, such as porous
asphalt or concrete, open-grid paving systems,
and infiltration trenches, to allow water to
move through the surface and into the soil
below to reduce stormwater runoff consistent
with the California Building Code and ADA
standards. For example, parking lanes may be
paved with unit pavers. Utilizing permeable
hardscape within the street corridor with existing storm drains will likely result in cost-savings when the storm drain system is replaced. They
can also reduce the heat island effect common
with traditional asphalt lots.
Permeable pavers can be used in parking areas/
driveways.
5-20 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
BICYCLING
These guidelines are based on the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM), the California MUTCD, the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the
Development of Bicycle Facilities, National Association of City Transportation Officials’ (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide, as well as best practices in
other communities. Bikeway planning and design
in California typically relies on the guidelines
and design standards established by Caltrans as
documented in “Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning
and Design” of the HDM. Chapter 1000 follows
standards developed by AASHTO and the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), and identifies
specific design standards for various conditions.
These standards provide a good framework for
future implementation, but may not always be
feasible given specific constraints. Bikeway design
and planning standards are continually changing
and expanding. Despite this, most agencies adopt
the Caltrans or AASHTO standards as a minimum.
Based on the California Streets and Highways Code,
Caltrans currently identifies four types of bikeways,
as described below.
■ Class I – Bike Paths. Also known as shareduse paths, these are bikeways that provide a completely separated ROW and are located off
the roadway for the exclusive use of bicycles
and pedestrians with crossflows by motor
vehicle traffic minimized. Since crossflows by
motor vehicle traffic should be minimized,
Class I bike paths are best implemented along
waterways (such as canals or creeks) that
have few cross streets, or along roadways with
strict access controls that limit the number of
driveways and cross streets.
■ Class II – Bike Lanes. These lanes are
demarcated in the roadway for the exclusive
or semi-exclusive use of bicycles. Vehicle and
pedestrian cross-flow are permitted. The
striping is supported by pavement markings
and signage.
§ Buffered Bike Lanes. Buffered bike lanes are
on-street bike lane facilities with additional
striping, which creates a buffer that increases
the separation between bicyclists and
Broken Class II green bike lane to allow vehicles to cross through.
Class I bike path shared for both pedestriand and
bicyclists.
Standard Class II bike lane.
Sharrow marking on a street with off-street parking.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-21
vehicles. The striped buffer should be a
minimum of 3 feet wide, where feasible.
Buffered bike lanes provide more separation
than standard Class II bike lanes, but less
separation than Class IV separated bikeways.
§ Green Bike Lanes. Green colorized pavement
may be used for Class II bike lanes in conflict
zones along corridors to heighten driver
awareness of cyclists. These conflict zones
occur at intersections and bus stops. For
example, a broken green bike lane would
alert drivers to the presence of bicyclists
when merging prior to making a right turn.
■ Class III – Bike Route. These are bikeways
that are shared with motor vehicle traffic. Bike
routes are designated by signage and/or shared
roadway bicycle markings, including sharrows.
§ Shared Bicycle/Vehicle Lanes (Sharrows).
Shared-lane markings, or sharrows, are a
common Class III pavement marking that
alerts drivers that bicyclists are sharing the
road. They are best used on streets with
less than 3,000 average daily traffic (ADT).
Sharrows should be painted near the center
of the travel lane, out of the parked vehicle
“door zone” in which a driver may open their
door and hit a bicyclist.
Sharrows may also be appropriate to alert
drivers to the presence of bicyclists in
locations where there may be insufficient
pavement width for Class II bike lanes. For
example, at intersections where Class II bike
lane markings may stop due to the addition
of a right turn lane and insufficient width for
a striped Class II bike lane, sharrow markings
could be added to facilitate bike travel
through the intersection. Shared bicycle
and vehicle lanes should include sharrows,
special materials, and other techniques to
slow vehicle traffic and integrate bicycle and
vehicle improvements.
■ Class IV – Cycle Tracks or Separated Bikeways.
These bikeways provide a ROW designated
exclusively for bicycle travel on a roadway and
are separated from vehicular traffic. Separated
bikeways are not shared with pedestrians or
motorized traffic except for brief mixing zones
Class IV cycle track with a physical barrier providing
separation from traffic.
where necessary and at intersections. Types
of separation include, but are not limited to,
grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible
physical barriers such as bollards, raised curbs,
or a landscaped area, or on-street parking.
Separated bikeways can be either one-way or
two-way, accommodating a single direction of
travel or both.
§ The implementation of Class IV separated
bikeways should consider the presence and
frequency of vehicle crossflows. Where a
corridor includes numerous and/or heavily
trafficked cross-streets or driveways, there
is an increase in vehicle-bicycle interactions,
which increases the possibility of collisions.
Additionally, the placement of vertical
separators should consider the locations of
building access points, access from parked
vehicles to the sidewalk, and commercial
and residential driveways/alleys. Vertical
separators should not hinder access to these
driveways.
§ The preferred bikeway width for a separated
bikeway is 7 feet to allow for passing and
maintenance (i.e., street sweepers). The
recommended minimum buffer width should
be 3 feet.
■ Special Bicycle Intersection Markings. Bicycle
crossings should be separate from pedestrian
crossings. Intersection designs should consider
special improvements, such as broken bike lane
extensions, shared lane markings, colorized
conflict areas, and other markings to clarify
bicycle crossing paths and identify conflict
zones to motorists.
5-22 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
■ Bicycle-Sensitive Detection. At traffic signals,
there should be bicycle-sensitive detection
at the limit line to detect bicycle traffic
consistent with the California MUTCD; bicyclist
push-buttons may be used to supplement the
required limit line detection.
■ Bicycle Parking. Secure bicycle parking is a
critical component to most bicycle trips, and
thus in promoting bicycle use (see Figures 5-9
to 5-11). Bicycle racks should be visibly located
at each FAX bus stop, especially at BRT stations,
and near active destinations, such as shopping
areas, schools, parks, and offices to promote
multi-modal transportation. They should be
visibly located near destinations and installed
either on the sidewalk outside the throughway
zone, such as in bulbouts, the curb zone,
frontage zone, or in plaza spaces.
TRANSIT
Transit improvements will be focused along corridors with BRT or enhanced transit service along California Avenue, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard,
and Elm Avenue.
■ Transit Integration. Pedestrian and bicycle
improvements should be integrated with
transit facilities and be compliant with the
ADA. Special design focus may be necessary
to coordinate improvements at major bus
stations, as these will be high-conflict zones
between buses, vehicles, and bicyclists. For
example, major bus/BRT stations could be
designed as platforms adjacent to the outside
travel lane, with bicyclists traveling between
the platform and adjacent sidewalk. This
reduces conflicts between buses and bicyclists.
■ Outside Travel Lane. The outside travel lane
may be painted to denote it is a lane for bus
travel. This outside travel lane should be at
least 11 feet wide to accommodate buses,
especially where a Class II Bike Lane or Class III
Bike Route is present.
2’-6”
3’-0”
(2’-8” Min.)
3’-0” Min.
(4’-0” Rec.)
20’-0”
2’-8” Min.
Main
Pedestrian
Circulation
6’-0” Min.
Clearance
7’-0”
Min.
Clearance
8’-0”
Min.
Clearance
4’-0” Min. Clearance
Bike Lockers
BIKE LOCKERS
5’-0”
Min.
4’-0”
Min. 2’-0” Min. or aligned
with street trees
Inverted U-rack
Street Furniture
BIKE CORRAL BIKE RACK SPACING RECOMMENDATIONS
Wheel Stops or
Striping
for visibility
Throughway Zone
5’-0” Min.
Curb Zone
2’-0” Min.
2’-6”
3’-0”
(2’-8” Min.)
3’-0” Min.
(4’-0” Rec.)
20’-0”
2’-8” Min.
Main
Pedestrian
Circulation
6’-0” Min.
Clearance
7’-0”
Min.
Clearance
8’-0”
Min.
Clearance
40 Min. Clearance
Bike Lockers
BIKE LOCKERS
5’-0”
Min.
4’-0”
Min. 2’-0” Min. or aligned
with street trees
Inverted U-rack
Street Furniture
BIKE CORRAL BIKE RACK SPACING RECOMMENDATIONS
Wheel Stops or
Striping
for visibility
Throughway Zone
5’-0” Min.
Curb Zone
2’-0” Min.
FIGURE 5-10 Bike Corral
FIGURE 5-11 Bike Rack Spacing
FIGURE 5-9 Bike Lockers
Main
Pedestrian
Circulation
-0”
Min.
arance
5’-0”
Min.
4’-0”
Min. 2’-0” Min. or aligned
with street trees
Inverted U-rack
Street Furniture
BIKE RACK SPACING RECOMMENDATIONS
Throughway Zone
5’-0” Min.
Curb Zone
2’-0” Min.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-23
D. GOALS AND POLICIES
PEDESTRIAN NETWORK
Goal T-1 Create a well-connected pedestrian network that allows Southwest Fresnans to comfortably walk to
key destinations such as schools,
parks, services, retail, and transit.
Policy T-1.1 Implement the pedestrian
recommendations from the City of
Fresno Active Transportation Plan
(ATP), focusing on the high priority
areas first.
Policy T-1.2 Prioritize sidewalk improvements,
including the priority sidewalk
network identified in the Fresno
ATP, on streets that generate
higher pedestrian travel demand,
especially along corridors, around
magnet uses, and within ¼- mile of
complete neighborhood nodes.
Policy T-1.3 Prioritize sidewalk improvements
on streets that connect to and
from Downtown.
Policy T-1.4 Encourage the provision of
new wide sidewalks in new
development areas or widen
existing sidewalks where ROW is
available to provide an adequate
and clear path of travel for
accessibility, consistent with the
California Building Code and ADA.
Policy T-1.5 Fill sidewalk gaps on streets in
areas where there are incomplete
segments of sidewalk adjacent
to existing sidewalks in order to
provide a continuous walking
experience, unless the area or
development was intentionally
planned without sidewalks.
Prioritize the Plan Area’s high
priority area identified in the
Fresno ATP.
Bike lockers and bike corral at a transit station.
Colored outside travel lane designated for buses.
Goal T-2 Create a vibrant pedestrian experience to enhance the character and identity of Southwest Fresno,
especially in commercial and employment areas.
Policy T-2.1 Enhance streetscape by providing
pedestrian amenities where
sidewalk widths allow, such as
benches, lighting, outdoor seating,
and planters.
Policy T-2.2 Utilize banners and signage, such
as wayfinding, to strengthen an
area’s distinct character.
5-24 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Goal T-3 Reduce conflicts between pedestrians and drivers, especially on streets with high speeds and
limited pedestrian crossings.
Policy T-3.1 Identify intersections and/or
mid-block locations to improve
pedestrian crossings. Crossing
improvements may include highvisibility crosswalks, bulb-outs, RRFBs or PHBs, in-pavement lights,
and signage.
Policy T-3.2 Ensure that sidewalks and other
facilities meet the principle of
universal design and comply with
the ADA standards to assure access
for pedestrians and people with
disabilities.
Policy T-3.3 Limit the number of driveways
along sidewalks by consolidating
existing driveways and minimizing
new driveways.
Policy T-3.4 Provide continuous sidewalks along
public streets and encourage the
provision of sidewalks on both
sides for all new development
within the Plan Area.
Policy T-3.5 Work with Southwest Fresno public
and charter schools to implement
Safe Routes to School projects and
programs that increase the comfort
of students walking and biking
to school and encourages the
frequency and number of students
to walk and bike to school.
BICYCLE NETWORK
Goal T-4 Create a comprehensive, wellconnected, and continuous bicycle network that provides linkages
between residential areas and local and regional key destinations such as schools, parks, services,
retail, and transit, so that Southwest Fresnans may bicycle as a viable mode of transportation and
as a means to improve health and
increase physical activity.
Policy T-4.1 Implement the bicycle
recommendations from the Fresno
ATP.
Policy T-4.2 Prioritize the implementation
of bicycle facilities, including
the priority bicycle network
identified in Fresno’s ATP, that fill
a gap between existing separated
sections of the bikeway system,
will likely serve the highest
concentration of existing or
potential bicyclists, and provide
access to high activity areas.
Policy T-4.3 Prioritize the implementation of
bicycle facilities that connect to
and from Downtown.
Policy T-4.4 Ensure that all roadway widening
projects in Southwest Fresno
include Class II or Class IV bicycle
facilities.
Policy T-4.5 Provide secure, high-quality
bicycle parking per the Citywide
Development Code’s Section 15-
2429 on Bicycle Parking, such as
racks and lockers, at key locations
along the bicycle network,
including transit stops, in front of
retail and services, for employment
offices, parks, and schools.
Policy T-4.6 Coordinate with County of Fresno
and FAX to improve regional bicycle
connections.
TRAILS NETWORK
Goal T-5 Create a separated, scenic, and
well-connected multi-use trails
network that provides Southwest
Fresnans convenient access to
nature and active recreational opportunities.
Policy T-5.1 Implement the Class I bikeway
recommendations from the City of
Fresno Active Transportation Plan
and General Plan Figure MT-2.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-25
Policy T-5.2 Prioritize trails that connect to and
from Downtown.
Policy T-5.3 Where feasible, design the trails
to have separated paths for travel
by foot and by bicycle to prevent
potential conflicts.
Policy T-5.4 Provide separation for trail users
against vehicular traffic such as
landscaping, railings, or grade
separation.
Policy T-5.5 Provide understory landscaping
and/or tree canopy as shade where
appropriate to enhance the natural
character of the trail.
Policy T-5.6 Ensure good visibility from public
streets and private businesses
and residences to enhance public
surveillance in accordance with
CPTED principles.
TRANSIT
Goal T-6 Develop the Southwest Fresno
transit network into a viable
transportation alternative to
single-occupancy vehicles.
Policy T-6.1 Improve the reliability, quality, and
efficiency of transit service within
Southwest Fresno and to regional
destinations.
Policy T-6.2 Work with FAX and other transit
providers to increase transit
service, access, and connections
throughout Southwest Fresno,
connecting existing and
future residential areas to key
destinations, including schools,
retail, employment, and recreation.
Policy T-6.3 Encourage transit ridership by all
people, including students and
youth, through incentive programs,
education, and outreach.
Policy T-6.4 Provide transit options that
equitably serve all residents,
including those of lower incomes,
of older age, and with disabilities.
Goal T-7 Focus transit improvements along
corridors that have more intensive land uses to more effectively and efficiently provide transit service and promote non-automobile access to high activity uses.
Policy T-7.1 Consider enhanced transit service
along Elm Avenue to connect to
future BRT routes and the FAX and
HSR stations in Downtown when
there is demand from development
along the Mixed-Use and Jobs
Corridor.
Policy T-7.2 Design transit stops and bus stop
platforms such that transit travel
has a higher priority than through
traffic on transit corridors.
VEHICLES
Goal T-8 Invest in developing, improving, and maintaining a roadway network that provides safety and
adequate capacity for automobiles and for walking, bicycling, and transit mobility.
Policy T-8.1 Consider and prioritize the
comfort of pedestrians, bicyclists,
and transit riders when planning
vehicular improvements
on roadways through the
implementation of complete
streets improvements.
Policy T-8.2 Reduce auto use and prioritize
walking, bicycling, and transit
mobility over increasing vehicle
travel speeds when considering
roadway improvements.
Policy T-8.3 Maintain the existing roadway
network and expand its capacity
as necessary to ensure safe and
convenient vehicular circulation;
require new development to
provide safe and convenient
vehicular circulation and
to contribute to capacity
improvements on arterials and
regional roadways.
5-26 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
TRUCKS
Goal T-9 Create a healthy environment for
Southwest Fresno residents by
intentionally routing truck traffic
away from sensitive areas such
as residential areas, parks, and
schools.
Policy T-9.1 Work with existing industrial and
heavy commercial businesses to
identify alternative truck routes
that limit negative impacts on
sensitive areas while maintaining
an efficient movement of goods.
Policy T-9.2 Mitigate alternative truck routes
that would require potential
widening of streets to allow
adequate width for two-way truck
traffic and turning movements
as well as repair/maintenance of
roadways to ensure satisfactory
pavement conditions that can
withstand truck traffic.
Policy T-9.3 Improve conditions of existing
and rerouted truck routes for
pedestrians and bicyclists by
implementing pedestrian and
bicycle facilities such as reduced
corner radii at intersections to slow
turning vehicular traffic, protected
signal phasing for truck left-turns,
enhanced high-visibility crossings,
protected bikeways, and wide
sidewalks.
COMPLETE STREETS
Goal T-10 Create an accessible and well-connected “complete streets” transportation network that serves community members of all ages,
income groups, and abilities, and
balances travel by all modes of
travel such as by car, bus, bicycle,
foot, or wheelchair.
Policy T-10.1 When feasible, design new
roadways and retrofit existing
roadways within magnet cores,
complete neighborhoods, and
along special corridors to prioritize
travel by walking, bicycling, and
riding transit, using the complete
streets design guidelines contained
in this chapter. For example, if
adequate or excessive vehicle
traffic capacity is available,
create wide sidewalks, provide
pedestrian amenities, and install
bicycle facilities such as separated
bikeways or bike lanes, bike
parking, and signage. This could
be in the form of a “road diet” to
transform certain corridors into
multi-modal streets.
Policy T-10.2 Identify streets with excessive
vehicular ROW that are
opportunities to implement traffic
calming and other improvements
to slow traffic and provide options
for multi-modal travel.
Policy T-10.3 Encourage lower vehicular travel
speeds for collector and local
streets in the Plan Area. This could
be accomplished through traffic
calming measures, narrower
travel lanes, reducing the number
of travel lanes, neighborhood
speed watch/traffic management
programs, or speed enforcement
programs.
Chapter 5 | Transportation 5-27
Goal T-11 Foster a healthy lifestyle in Southwest Fresno through encouraging active forms of transportation
such as walking and bicycling
as an alternative to motorized
modes of travel.
Policy T-11.1 Prioritize the implementation of
facilities that encourage walking
and biking, such as sidewalks,
multi-use trails, and bikeways.
Policy T-11.2 Develop adult and youth bicycle
and pedestrian education programs
within Southwest Fresno that help
educate the public and promote
bicycling and walking.
Policy T-11.3 Support Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) programs
to encourage alternative modes
of travel to the single-occupancy
vehicle such as transit use,
car- or vanpool, rideshare, and
telecommuting.
STORMWATER
Goal T-12 Improve storm water quality
through transportation infrastructure improvements.
Policy T-12.1 Coordinate with the Fresno
Metropolitan Flood Control
District (FMFCD) Master Plan
to incorporate Low Impact
Development (LID) storm water
management techniques with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk improvements.
Policy T-12.2 Manage stormwater on-site to
cleanse, diffuse, and absorb
rainwater where it falls by creating
rain gardens, swales, infiltration
areas, and other attractive areas
that bring nature and beauty into
developed areas.
Policy T-12.3 Work with FMFCD to reduce or
waive development impact fees if
LID development is implemented
onsite.
MAINTENANCE
Goal T-13 Ensure that Southwest Fresno’s
transportation infrastructure is
in well-maintained conditions
to provide a comfortable travel
experience for pedestrians and
bicyclists.
Policy T-13.1 Perform routine street
maintenance to clear debris
from sidewalks, bike lanes, and
roadways, including regular
sweeping, pavement repairs,
restriping, maintenance of traffic
control devices, and landscape
maintenance.
Policy T-13.2 Monitor the conditions of
roadways to ensure the repair and
resurfacing of cracked and uneven
roadway surfaces to provide a
smooth and even surface for
bicycling.
Policy T-13.3 Monitor the effectiveness of street
lights to ensure they are lit brightly
enough to improve visibility and
enhance visibility and security.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-1
PUBLIC
FACILITIES
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter describes the public facilities in
Southwest Fresno that achieve the Southwest
Fresno Specific Plan’s (the Plan) vision and guiding
principles (described in Chapter 2, Vision). In
keeping with that vision, as well as the General
Plan’s vision, Southwest Fresno is to be made up of
a network of complete neighborhoods, designed
to be healthy and attractive. Centered by schools,
parks, and public and commercial services, these
complete neighborhoods will have a sense of place
and provide as many services as possible within
walking distance. The Plan prioritizes the need for
quality schools, parks, open space, and other public
facilities in Southwest Fresno and increases land
dedicated to public facilities from the General Plan.
B. PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE
This section provides an inventory of existing parks
and needs, states the community’s criteria for
parkland, and describes proposed desired improve-
ments to existing parks and new parks.
EXISTING PARKLAND INVENTORY
Table 6-1 provides information on the existing parks
and open space within walking distance of South-
west Fresno residents, which includes all parkland
less than 40 acres in size owned and/or maintained
by the City of Fresno, San Joaquin River Parkway,
and Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District’s
(FMFCD) ponding basin parks within or just outside
the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan Area (Plan
Area). Parkland over 40 acres in size is considered a
regional park, such as the Regional Sports Complex.
Policy POSS-1-a on page 5-20 of the General Plan 6
6-2 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Parks should have more trees to provide shade.
Ponding basins collect water to manage stormwater
runoff.
states that the City’s parkland standard is three
acres per 1,000 residents for Pocket, Neighborhood, and Community parks, with an aspirational goal of five acres per 1,000 residents for all parks
throughout the city, if additional funding for regional parks and trails is identified. Using the City’s methodology of counting open space as parkland,
Table 6-1 shows that the existing parks listed meets
and even exceeds the General Plan’s parkland
standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents at a ratio
of 3.45 acres per 1,000 residents. The parkland-toresident ratio calculation uses a Southwest Fresno population of 12,649 people. Note that the table
does not include Southwest Fresno’s Regional
Sports Complex since it is a regional park and more
than 40 acres in size.
There has been extensive discussion from the
community about what types of open space meet
the community’s criteria for usable parkland. The
community has expressed that there are certain
types of open space that fall short from the
community’s parkland criteria and should not be
considered usable parkland, described below:
■ Ponding Basins and Ponding Basin Parks.
Some of Fresno’s ponding basins are used
seasonally as parkland. The Plan Area’s ponding
basins (Basin FF and Basin TT2) are retention
basins, which are designed to retain and
infiltrate water. The community, however, does
not consider ponding basins/ponding basin
parks as adequate parkland because they
have limited amenities and access. The west
section of Basin FF (west of West Avenue) is
for recharge only and has no public access.
The east section of Basin FF has a tot lot at the
southeast corner, which is open to the general
public year-round, but access to the rest of the
basin is used as a driving range and limited to
the Fresno-Greater San Joaquin Valley Junior
Golf Foundation. Basin TT2’s “upper level”
play area is generally closed during the winter
depending on the conditions affected by the
winter season’s rain.
Community park with playground structures
surrounded by housing.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-3
PARK
NAME
EXISTING
ACREAGE NOTES EXISTING AMENITIES
Chandler* 2.00 Mini park surrounded on all sides by housing; located west of Chandler Airport
Barbecues, Basketball Courts,
Children’s Play Area, Picnic Tables
CFD11_
TR5549_04* 0.35 Surrounded on all sides by housing;
unnamed Benches
Habitat* 1.30 Surrounded on all sides by housing None
Sunset* 0.98 Located next to the Sunset Neighborhood
Center and Sunset Elementary School
Barbecues, Children’s Play Area,
Community Center, Computer
Lab, Kitchen, Picnic Tables,
Restrooms, Social Hall, Wading
Pool
Mary Ella
Brown* 4.25 Located next to the Mary Ella Brown Community Center Baseball/Softball Fields, Children’s
Play Area, Community Center,
Computer Lab, Football/Soccer
Field, Kitchen, Parking Lot,
Restrooms, Social Hall, Swimming
Pool
Neilsen* 4.15 Neighborhood park adjacent to Fresno Park Barbecues, Baseball/Softball Fields,
Basketball Courts, Children’s Play
Area, Football/Soccer Field, Picnic
Tables, Restrooms
Almy Park* 0.41 New pocket park built by Habitat for
Humanity
Benches, Canopy Tent, Picnic
Tables/Benches, Play Structures
Hinton* 6.18
Just outside of the Plan Area, but within
walking distance of Plan Area residences;
located next to Cecil C. Hinton Community
Center
Barbecues, Baseball/Softball Fields,
Basketball/Tennis/Hockey Court,
Children’s Play Area, Football/
Soccer Field, Picnic Tables, Tennis
Courts
Bigby-Villa* 2.09
Pocket park just outside of the Plan Area,
but within walking distance of Plan Area
residences; near Bigby Villa Apartments
Children’s Play Area
Pride Park* 0.38
Pocket park just outside of the Plan Area,
but within walking distance of Plan Area
residences and near Franklin School
Benches, Trash Can, Porta Potty
Ponding
Basin/Park FF 1.47
Owned by FMFCD; this acreage only
accounts for the portion that is usable yearround
Barbecue Grills, Benches, Canopy
Structure, Drinking Fountains, Picnic
Tables, Play Structures
Ponding
Basin/Park
TT2
4.00 Owned by the FMFCD; this acreage only
accounts for the portion that is most
accessible with amenities during non-rainy
seasons; closed during rainy season
Benches, Canopy Structures, Play
Structures
Hyde* 16.03 Neighborhood park near toxic site; on landfill None TOTAL
ACREAGE 43.59 acres
Parklandto-Residents
Ratio
3.45 acres per 1,000 residents
TABLE 6-1 Existing Parkland Inventory Counted Toward the General Plan’s 3 Acres per 1,000 Residents Standard
Source: Acreage and list of amenities from City of Fresno. * Parks owned by the City of Fresno.
6-4 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
INCREASING WALKABILITY TO
PARKS
The Plan designates locations for new parks,
taking into consideration whether the park would
be within walking distance to nearby residences
and focusing on areas where existing residences
lack convenient access to parkland. In general,
new parks are located at the nodes of complete
neighborhoods. Figure 6-1 shows the locations of
existing and new parks relative to all types of existing and new residential uses within the Plan Area.
Residential areas within the dashed blue circles
are within a half-mile-radius walking distance from
existing parks; residential areas within the dashed
white circles are within a half-mile-radius walking
■ Hyde Park. The community expressed that
open space located on or close to a landfill or
toxic site, such as Hyde Park, should not be
counted as parkland due to concerns for the
community’s environmental health and the
limited uses allowed on the land.
■ The Regional Sports Complex. The community
thinks that the Regional Sports Complex is
inadequate parkland because it is not within
walking distance of most existing Southwest
Fresno residential neighborhoods and requires
an entry fee.
When following the community’s parkland criteria
and excluding the types of unusable parkland
previously described such as ponding basin park
areas with limited access and Hyde Park, existing
parkland in Southwest Fresno equals a total of
22.09 acres, which yields a parkland-to-resident
ratio of 1.74 acres per 1,000 residents. 1.74 acres
per 1,000 residents is well below the three acres
per 1,000 residents standard.
The Plan recommends providing new parkland
to increase total acreage as well as the following
mitigations that would improve the conditions of
inadequate parks so that the existing parkland
in Southwest Fresno better fits the community’s
parkland criteria:
■ Increase access and improve amenities at
ponding basin parks. To improve the usability
of ponding basin parks, the Plan recommends
increasing amenities and access so that these
parks can function better as parkland in order
to serve nearby residents. Furthermore,
parkland acreage for ponding basin parks
should be limited to the upper and/or middle
levels of the park that are usable as parkland;
this method of counting acreage will improve
the accuracy of the parkland-to-resident ratio.
These acreage totals are already reflected in
Table 6-1.
■ Re-designate Hyde Park’s land use from
Community Park to general Open Space.
Because Hyde Park is located on a landfill, park
amenities and development on the land are
limited. Re-designating Hyde Park as a different
type of land use will improve the accuracy of
the parkland-to-resident ratio in Southwest
Fresno.
■ Increase accessibility to the Regional
Sports Complex. Currently, the Regional
Sports Complex is located away from existing
residential neighborhoods and has limited
walkable or bikeable access. As described in
Chapter 5, Transportation, the Plan proposes to
connect all Southwest Fresno neighborhoods
to the Regional Sports Complex via new
bikeways and multi-use trails. The Plan’s overall
land use vision also locates new residential
neighborhoods in the Sphere of Influence (SOI)
within walkable distance of the Regional Sports
Complex.
Entry signage to the Regional Sports Complex.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-5
FIGURE 2-1 Conceptual Vision for Southwest Fresno
41 41
180
99 99
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE
ATCHISON ST
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
MLK JR. BLVD
H
FIG AVE
UGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
New Parks
Existing Neighborhood/
Community Center with Park Facilities
Existing Schools
New Schools
Residential Areas Underserved
by Existing Parks
Existing Parks
Existing Residential Areas
New Residential Areas
½-mile Walkable Radius
Around New Parks
½-mile Walkable Radius
Around Existing Parks
Source: City of Fresno
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
Plan Area
FIGURE 6-1 Residential Areas Served by Existing and New Parks 2 1
3 4
5 CHANDLER
PARK
REGIONAL
SPORTS
COMPLEX
MARY ELLA
BROWN
COMMUNITY
CTR.
SUNSET NBHD. CTR.
HINTON
PARK
BIGBYVILLA
PARK
PRIDE
PARK
WEST FRESNO
MIDDLE
WEST FRESNO
ELEMENTARY
RUTHERFORD
B. GASTON
MIDDLE
WEB DUBOIS
PUBLIC CHARTER
BETHUNE
ELEMENTARY
SUNSET
ELEMENTARY
CFD11_TR5549_04
PARK
HABITAT
PARK
PARK
TT2
PARK
FF
NEILSEN
PARK
ALMY
PARK
FIGURE 6-1 Residential Areas Served by Existing and New Parks 6-6 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
distance from new parks. At full build-out, existing
and new parks within the Plan Area will serve all
existing and new residential areas within a half-mile
walking distance. A few parcels west of Highway
41 are located just beyond the half-mile radius
of proposed and existing public parks, however
they are zoned Neighborhood Mixed-Use, which
requires on-site open space.
The prioritization of creating new parks should
be based on whether its location will benefit an
existing residential neighborhood that currently
is not within walking distance of a park. Figure
6-1 sheds light on which existing residential
neighborhoods are currently not within walking
distance of a park, including the following areas
numbered and outlined in orange on the map: (1)
the area bounded by Marks, Madison, Lead, and
Chandler Avenues; (2) the area bounded by MLK Jr.
Boulevard, Kaviland, Garrett, Bardell, Grove, Clara,
and Jensen Avenues; (3); the area/new apartment
complex along Jensen Avenue near Elm Avenue;
(4) the area bounded by Highway 41, Elm, Church,
and Jensen Avenues; and (5) the area bounded by
the Plan Area boundary to the west, and Walnut,
Samson, and North Avenues. The construction of
new parks located within half-mile radius distance
of these aforementioned neighborhoods should
be prioritized over the construction of other new
parks.
The locations of existing and new schools are also
shown on the map to highlight opportunities for
joint-use park space that could be accessible to the
public during after-school hours. The City recently
amended its joint-use agreements with the Central
Unified School District and Fresno Unified School
District to expand the community use of school
sites in order to improve the opportunities for
public and community recreational activity.
Park with enhanced pedestrian crossing.
Pocket park in the center of a residential neighborhood.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-7
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
In addition to providing an adequate amount of
parkland within the Plan Area, existing parks should
be renovated and new parks should be designed
so that they have appropriate amenities that are
considered valuable to the community. Improvements to existing parks should be prioritized over the construction of new parks. Amenities include
not only infrastructure, but also landscaping,
programs, and activities. As described earlier in
the chapter, the Plan proposes to also increase
existing park amenities at Southwest Fresno’s
ponding basin parks, which include Park FF and
Park TT2. Table 6-2 provides a list of essential
and recommended amenities for parks. Each park
should uniquely serve its nearby community by
providing opportunities for desired activities and
catering to the community’s social makeup (e.g.,
youth, elderly, dog owners, sports players). Park
infrastructure should be in good condition and
regularly maintained and cleaned. Parks should
also feel safe and secure with adequate fencing and
lighting as well as surveillance from enforcement
officials and community members, as noted in
Chapter 4, Development Regulations, under the
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) section.
Playground with overhead shade structure.
AMENITY TYPE ESSENTIAL RECOMMENDED
Infrastructure
■ Restrooms
■ Water fountains
■ Lighting
■ Trash cans
■ Benches or other forms of seating
■ Playground equipment with shade
structure
■ Stage for cultural performances
■ Community center for community
parks and larger
Activities
■ At least one of the activities in the
adjacent “Recommended” column
■ Outdoor places to gather
Two or more of the following:
■ Baseball fields
■ Basketball courts
■ Tennis courts
■ Soccer fields
■ Bike and walking trails
■ Barbecue areas
■ Skate/BMX parks
■ Off-leash dog area
■ Water feature
Landscaping
■ Drought-tolerant trees for shade and
vegetation
■ Canopies with benches and tables
■ Drought-friendly turf areas that can
withstand heavy traffic
TABLE 6-2 Essential and Recommended Park Amenities
6-8 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
C. EDUCATION
This section provides an overview of the school
districts, an inventory of existing schools, and
describes proposed improvements to existing
schools and new schools. The Plan Area is made up
of three unified school districts, but predominantly
Fresno Unified in the northern half and Washington
Unified in the southern half (see Figure 6-2). The
Central Unified School District is located to the
west of the Plan Area, but overlaps a minimal number of existing residential properties within the Plan Area. Near the freeway intersection of Highway 41
and Highway 99, the school district boundaries of
Fresno Unified and Washington Unified alternate in
the east-west and north-south directions. It is likely
that residents in this area may live in close proximity of each other, but are assigned to different school districts, and thus attend different schools.
The Plan Area consists of two elementary schools
(Sunset and West Fresno), two middle schools
(Rutherford B. Gaston and West Fresno), and
no high schools. Rutherford B. Gaston (Gaston)
Middle School was recently constructed. There
are two charter schools, Bethune (elementary)
and WEB Dubois (K to 12) within the Plan Area.
Refer to Figure 6-1 for the locations of existing and
proposed schools.
Edison High School is located outside, but very
proximate to the Plan Area, and is located within
two districts, but belongs to Fresno Unified School
District. Washington Union High School serves the
Washington Unified District, but is located outside
of the Plan Area and approximately four miles
south of the Plan Area’s southern edge.
Recently constructed Gaston Middle School.
As described in the Community Environmental
Health section in Chapter 1, Introduction, in Southwest Fresno, a large percentage of adults have not completed high school and few have earned a
college degree. Edison High and several elementary
schools score below Academic Performance Index’s
statewide standards. These academic indicators
indicate a need for greater academic achievement
among children and youth living in Southwest
Fresno.
EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
In the 2009 West Fresno Asset Map: Community
Plan, the Southwest Fresno community identified
improving financial literacy and promoting higher
education/training for residents as a top priority,
along with increasing funding for area schools. In
2010, the California Endowment launched its Building Healthy Communities (BHC) initiative, a 10-year strategic plan designed to improve health systems
and the physical, social, economic and service
structures that support healthy living and healthy
behaviors in central, southeast, and southwest
sectors of Fresno. BHC recognizes the importance
of schools as providing anchors in the communities
they serve, as well as promoting healthy behaviors
and serving as gateways for resources and services.
It should be noted that educational facilities are
provided by entities that have a special mission
and financial structure to do so, such as a school
district. The City of Fresno, as a local government,
does not have direct control over schools; however,
the City can partner with educational institutions to
work toward common goals.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-9
FIGURE 6-2 Schools and School Districts
Sunset Elementary School
Bethune Elementary School
Edison High School
Big Picture High School
Columbia Elementary School
Lincoln Elementary School
King Elementary School
Rutherford B. Gaston Middle School
WEB Dubois Public Charter School
West Fresno Middle School
West Fresno Elementary School
Kirk Elementary School
Acel Fresno Charter High School
Lowell Elementary School
Yokomi Elementary School
Jefferson Elementary School
Pershing Continuation High School
Anchor Academy Charter School
West Park Elementary School
41 41
180
99 99
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
EXISTING UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Fresno Unified
Washington Unified
Central Unified
Existing School
FIGURE 6-2 Schools and School Districts
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
Plan Area
Sunset Elementary School
Bethune Elementary School
Edison High School
Big Picture High School
Columbia Elementary School
Lincoln Elementary School
King Elementary School
Rutherford B. Gaston Middle School
WEB Dubois Public Charter School
West Fresno Middle School
West Fresno Elementary School
Kirk Elementary School
Acel Fresno Charter High School
Lowell Elementary School
Yokomi Elementary School
Jefferson Elementary School
Pershing Continuation High School
Anchor Academy Charter School
West Park Elementary School
Computech Middle School
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
VALENTINE AVE ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Source: City of Fresno
Sunset Elementary School
Bethune Elementary School
Edison High School
Big Picture High School
Columbia Elementary School
Lincoln Elementary School
King Elementary School
Rutherford B. Gaston Middle School
WEB Dubois Public Charter School
West Fresno Middle School
West Fresno Elementary School
Kirk Elementary School
Acel Fresno Charter High
Lowell Elementary School
Yokomi Elementary School
Jefferson Elementary S
Pershing Continuation High School
Anchor Academy Charter School
West Park Elementary School
41 41
180
99 0 0.25mi 0.25mi
EXISTING UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Fresno Unified
Washington Unified
Central Unified
Existing School
FIGURE 6-2 Schools and School Districts
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
Plan Area
Sunset Elementary School
Bethune Elementary School
Edison High School
Big Picture High School
Columbia Elementary School
Lincoln Elementary School
King Elementary School
Rutherford B. Gaston Middle School
WEB Dubois Public Charter School
West Fresno Middle School
West Fresno Elementary School
Kirk Elementary School
Acel Fresno Charter High
Lowell Elementary School
Yokomi Elementary School
Jefferson Elementary S
Pershing Continuation High School
Anchor Academy Charter School
West Park Elementary School
Computech Middle School
M
ARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
VALENTINE AVE ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Source: City o
6-10 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
K to 12 Schools
The Plan envisions each complete neighborhood
with at least one or more grade schools so students
can walk to school. This includes four elementary
schools within the Plan Area (a total of nine in the
Plan Area and SOI combined), two middle schools
within the Plan Area (a total of five in the Plan
Area and SOI combined), and one new middle/high
school/special school within the SOI. Each school is
either adjacent to or within one-eighth-mile from a
nearby park.
Community College
The area identified as the “MLK Activity Center” in
the Fresno General Plan (General Plan), bounded
by Church Avenue, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Jensen Avenue, and Knight Avenue, is envisioned as the future home to an educational use, particularly a community college campus. While it
is not certain that a community college campus will
be funded and built in Southwest Fresno, the land
use map proposes Public Facility - College to allow
this type of development. The areas surrounding
it are planned for housing, community commercial
uses, mixed use, and a park in order to facilitate
compatible uses.
Training Centers
To offer more opportunities for residents to increase their skills and improve overall employment in Southwest Fresno, the Plan identifies locations
for public facilities which can be used for training
centers for young people and adults. This priority
is tied to the City’s healthy community goal. When
communities can obtain quality education and job
training, secure employment with living wages that
allow self-sufficiency, and feel safe within one’s
neighborhood, they are likelier to enjoy healthy
lives.
D. OTHER PUBLIC
FACILITIES
Other public facilities with dedicated land area
within the Plan Area include hospital/clinic, neighborhood centers, and PG&E stations. As described in the Community Environmental Health section
in Chapter 1, Introduction, the choices to access
medical care have improved in recent years. Medical care facilities that serve the Southwest Fresno community include Easton Community Health
Center, Elm Community Health Center (Clinic Sierra
Vista), West Fresno Community Health Center, and
Gaston Middle School’s on-site health clinic.
California State University, Fresno college campus serves as a community college magnet use.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-11
E. GOALS AND POLICIES
The following goals and related polices address
Parks and Open Space, Education, and other Public
Facilities, and are intended to work in tandem with
and refine those of the General Plan.
The 2017 Fresno Parks Master Plan, which is now
being developed, identifies parks-related citywide
challenges that are similar to those in Southwest
Fresno and in response, contains efficiency and
quality standards for Fresno parks citywide. The
Fresno Parks Vision document completed in
December 2016 envisions a citywide parks system
that provides parks that are accessible, equitable,
healthy, safe, beautifully designed, and innovative.
The identified citywide challenges include poor
conditions of parks; lack of accessibility; crime and
safety; and lack of shade. The following Parks and
Open Space goals and policies strive to address
these challenges and realize the Plan’s vision.
Goal PF-1 Improve existing parks as the
highest priority to create high
quality outdoor spaces that
Southwest Fresno residents care
about in order to foster a healthy
and active community.
Policy PF-1.1 Upgrade the amenities in existing
parks, including ponding basin
parks, by first improving the conditions of existing amenities and then renovating parks to provide new
amenities. All parks should have
well-maintained and fully accessible essential and desired amenities, including park infrastructure, activities, landscaping, and seating.
Policy PF-1.2 Provide a sense of safety and
security at existing parks by addressing delinquent activities and occupation by transient populations through enforcement and community design in keeping with
CPTED principles.
Policy PF-1.3 Remediate toxic sites on and/or
directly adjacent to existing parkland to improve the environmental health of the community.
Goal PF-2 Increase the overall amount of
usable parkland within Southwest
Fresno allowing varied recreational opportunities for the entire Southwest Fresno community.
Policy PF-2.1 Develop new parks, tot lots, and
playing fields within a half-mile
walking distance (a ten-minute
walk) from existing and new residential areas, prioritizing existing developed neighborhoods that are
deficient of such amenities and in
areas along transit-priority corridors such as California Avenue, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard,
and Elm Avenue.
Policy PF-2.2 If possible, site new parks to have
maximum visibility by surrounding
residences to increase “eyes on
the street” and thus create natural
surveillance in keeping with CPTED
principles.
Policy PF-2.3 Utilize vacant and/or underutilized
land for park uses. The transformation of vacant and/or underutilized land into parks can be phased over
time with temporary or transitional
park activity.
Policy PF-2.4 Meet the General Plan’s parkland
standard for at least three acres of
parkland to be provided per 1,000
residents for all parkland less than
40 acres in size owned and/or
maintained by the City of Fresno,
San Joaquin River Parkway, FMFCD
ponding basin/parks, owned
and maintained by an HOA and
publically accessible (no gate), and
where there is little likelihood that
the use or access will change, while
striving for five acres of parkland
to be provided per 1,000 residents
6-12 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
which includes all parkland counted toward three acres per 1,000 residents, all parkland 40 acres or
greater in size, and all trails of any
size.
Policy PF-2.5 Promote joint-use public facilities, such as community centers, libraries, parks, school fields,
playgrounds, gyms, auditoriums,
and aquatic facilities, which can
augment and provide a wider
range of recreation activities and
park amenities to the public.
Goal PF-3 Enhance the natural landscape
and character of Southwest
Fresno by integrating the natural
environment with the built environment.
Policy PF-3.1 Promote tree planting on private
and public property, including
parks and parking lots, to increase
the amount of tree canopy and
enhance the aesthetic of Southwest Fresno.
Policy PF-3.2 Provide a network of multi-use
trails, including along the Fresno
Irrigation District (FID) canal rightof-ways, to provide an off-street trail system that is integrated into
the transportation network while
also providing opportunities for
recreation and access to nature
and parks.
Policy PF-3.3 Utilize landscaping as buffers
between sensitive uses such as
residential areas and schools from
higher intensity development and
transportation per the Citywide
Development Code.
Policy PF-3.4 Encourage the use of low wateruse plant materials and water efficient landscaping initiatives for
the Plan Area.
Goal PF-4 Provide adequate access to medical facilities to support the mental and physical health of Southwest
Fresnans.
Policy PF-4.1 Work with the County of Fresno
Health Department and hospitals
to increase siting and development
of small-scale medical clinics and
larger-scale medical facilities,
particularly within magnet cores.
Goal PF-5 Ensure that the amount of existing and new schools within the Plan Area adequately support
the number of existing and new
residents.
Policy PF-5.1 Work with school districts and
public charter schools in siting new
schools for anticipated potential
increases in the Southwest Fresno
residential population and the
resulting impacts on school capacity and enrollment.
Goal PF-6 Provide public educational and
training facilities that help foster the pursuit and achievement of higher education and higher
skilled vocations.
Policy PF-6.1 Provide new adult and youth
educational and job training
programs in existing and new
public facilities or institutions, such
as offices and schools within the
Plan Area or in close proximity, that
prepare residents for medium- and
high-wage jobs.
Policy PF-6.2 Support the current initiative to
locate a new job training center
accessible to Southwest Fresno
residents.
Policy PF-6.3 Work with the State Center Community College District’s Board to fund and develop a community
college campus within the Plan’s
southern magnet core/MLK Activity
Center.
Chapter 6 | Public Facilities 6-13
Policy PF-6.4 Work with youth-oriented community organizations to develop programs that help nurture leadership and ambition in the youth of Southwest Fresno.
Goal PF-7 Increase opportunities for residents to improve their job skills and employment options.
Policy PF-7.1 Coordinate existing training
programs with the Fresno Regional
Workforce Investment Board,
educational institutions, and public
charter schools to identify program
gaps and areas of overlap.
Policy PF-7.2 Work with local schools, community groups, and non-profits to connect students and residents to
existing training programs.
Policy PF-7.3 Partner with the Workforce Investment Board, or other interested organizations, businesses, schools,
and residents to expand opportunities for youth jobs for after school and summer work, volunteer positions, and other skills development opportunities.
Goal PF-8 Locate parks, schools, and other
public facilities equitably.
Policy PF-8.1 Work with school districts and
public charter schools to establish
joint-use agreements to share
school facilities, such as fields,
playgrounds, gyms, auditoriums,
and aquatic facilities, in order to
provide a wider range of recreation
programs and maximize the
efficient use, maintenance, and
supervision of public facilities.
Policy PF-8.2 Identify, where appropriate, jointuse opportunities to site parks near other City service facilities.
Policy PF-8.3 Work with hospitals and the
County of Fresno Health Department to site medical clinics and medical facilities.
Goal PF-9 Support programs, leadership,
and opportunities for Fresno’s
youth of all ages and abilities.
Policy PF-9.1 Work with public agencies,
community-based organizations,
and school districts to provide
afterschool programs for youth.
Policy PF-9.2 Facilitate connections to schools
and community resources.
Policy PF-9.3 Involve youth directly in planning
for services and programs to
increase program innovation and
youth ownership and interest.
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-1
UTILITIES
A. INTRODUCTION
Utility services in the vicinity must be enhanced to
support the development of the Southwest Fresno
Specific Plan Area (Plan Area). This area is a mixture
of undeveloped and developed agricultural,
residential, public, commercial and industrial land
uses. Utility providers currently serving existing
needs have plans in place to serve future needs in
accordance with the Fresno General Plan (General
Plan) for the area. Water and sewer services are
provided by the City of Fresno; storm water
drainage systems are constructed and maintained
by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
(FMFCD); irrigation water is supplied by the Fresno
Irrigation District (FID); electricity and gas utilities are provided by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E);
and telephone, fiber, and cable service is provided
by AT&T/Comcast/Xfinity. Recycled water is not yet
utilized in the Plan Area, but is planned and will be
provided by the City of Fresno. Land use categories
in the Plan Area are listed with total acreage for
both existing and planned land uses in Table 7-1. 7
METHODOLOGY
As described in Chapter 3, Land Use, the City
of Fresno assigns dual land use designations to
new parks, open space, and public facilities land.
Many of the dual land use designations are more
intensive than the primary planned land use. To
best understand and plan for future utility needs,
the utilities analysis compares the Plan Area’s
most intensive land use designations with the
General Plan’s least intensive designations since
this comparison will result in the greatest possible
change in water usage and basin volume.
7-2 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
TABLE 7-1 Total Acreage by Land Use Classification for General Plan (GP) and Specific Plan (SP)
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AND ABBREVIATION
GP
(ACRES)
SP
(ACRES)
AREA
Δ (%)
Employment -
Business Park cbp 169.77 0.00 -100%
Commercial -
Community cc 59.85 109.82 83%
Commercial -
General cgh 0.37 0.37 0%
Corridor/Center
Mixed-Use cmx 69.12 96.29 39%
Employment -
Office co 16.11 194.26 1110%
Commercial -
Regional cr 38.20 63.53 66%
Clear Zone cz 0.00 13.86 100%
Commercial -
Highway & Auto hwy 43.26 0.00 -100%
Industrial -
Heavy ih 36.41 0.00 -100%
Industrial - Light il 108.49 0.00 -100%
Neighborhood
Mixed-Use nmx 0.00 136.25 100%
Open Space -
Ponding Basin obp 204.89 209.39 2%
Open Space -
Park orp 3.49 1.61 -54%
Open Space -
Community Park orpc 48.11 1.94 -96%
Open Space -
Neighborhood
Park
orpn 44.36 4.5 -96%
Open Space -
Regional Park orpr 246.17 134.64 -45%
Public Facilities -
Airport pa 1.95 1.95 0%
Public Facilities -
College pc 0.00 23.61 100%
Public Facilities pf 30.03 137.39 358%
Public Facilities
- Neighborhood
Center
pnc 5.44 5.44 0%
Public Facilities -
Church pqch 2.05 0.00 -100%
Public Facilities -
PG&E Substation pqge 3.84 3.84 0%
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AND ABBREVIATION
GP
(ACRES)
SP
(ACRES)
AREA
Δ (%)
Public Facilities -
Hospital pqmh 5.08 5.08 0%
Public Facilities
- Elementary
School
pse 37.59 17.96 -52%
Public Facilities -
Middle School psm 63.66 38.94 -39%
Public Facilities -
Water Recharge pwrb 6.66 6.66 0%
Residential High
Density rh 22.05 0.00 -100%
Residential Low
Density rl 41.39 41.39 0%
Residential
Medium Density rm 828.25 873.82 6%
Residential
Medium High
Density
rmh 32.13 33.79 5%
Residential
Medium Low
Density
rml 534.56 511.80 -4%
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
Density
run 90.91 107.32 18%
Note: The symbol Δ indicates the delta or change compared between the General Plan and Southwest Fresno Specific Plan.
Sewer and Water Utility Analysis
Land use comparisons between the General Plan
and the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (the Plan)
were used to estimate changes to planned sewer
and water systems for the Plan Area. The General
Plan considers existing capacity, enhancements to
existing system, as well as future sewer and water
systems anticipated to meet future demand; the
General Plan provided the baseline for the analysis.
Changes in sewer and water demand were derived
from acreage changes by land use with adoption of
the Plan.
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-3
Constructed utility lines are sized and planned to
meet the requirements of the area at full buildout
as well as other known requirements of the utility
owners. Construction of utility improvements will
depend on sequence and schedule of development. Each land use was given a demand value in million gallons per day (MGpd) for both sewer and
water. Demand calculations per land use under the
General Plan and the Plan were summed separately
and compared individually and the aggregate totals
were checked. These calculations were broken
down for the area within the Plan Area and outside
the Plan Area but within the General Plan Sphere of
Influence (SOI).
Total aggregate capacity is one factor and
largely determines the cost of water supply capital
improvements and treatment plant capacity. In
addition, spatial changes in land use and densities
can have an impact on the water distribution and
wastewater collection system requirements on a
smaller scale. For example, single-family residences
create a far different utility footprint and cost
profile than an urban high density residential
housing complex. These differences were captured
through comparison of expected system designs for
each type of land use.
Storm Drainage Impacts
Total aggregate capacity is important but for storm
drainage cost determination, a far more crucial
capacity is the required capacity for each storm
water basin. There are currently 14 basin areas
in the Plan Area and each of these areas was
analyzed to determine changes from the General
Plan baseline. Pivot table information based on the
GIS analysis provided the acreages by flood control
basin for analysis.
B. WET UTILITIES NEEDS
ANALYSIS AND
IMPROVEMENTS
WATER SUPPLY
The City of Fresno Water Department will serve
the Plan Area. Two water wells in the area and six
wells outside the area supply water to a pipeline
distribution network of more than 47 miles varying
in size from four inches to 14 inches. Current
system capacity, General Plan forecast required
capacity, and the Plan required capacity are 2 MGD,
7.1 MGD, and 7.4 MGD, respectively. Utilizing the
General Plan as the base for comparison, the Plan
requires a 5 percent increase in water demand over
the General Plan buildout. Figure 7-1 illustrates the
existing and proposed water systems.
The utilities are planned on expected future
consumption. Future for water related capital
improvements will need to comply with applicable
federal, state and local requirements, including
the City of Fresno Water Conservation Act. Future
projects are required to consume lower than
expected consumption.
New municipal wells and water delivery pipelines
will be required in the Plan Area to serve new
growth; these new wells and pipelines were already
identified as necessary in the General Plan. Facilities will be sized to provide delivery capacity to meet water demands during peak conditions and at
the same time meet fire protection needs. Peaking
factors, fire flow requirements, and a system
pressure range, which must be utilized in designing
the facilities, are set out in the City’s standard
specifications. Table 7-2 compares the anticipated
water usage per land use in the Plan to those in the
General Plan.
7-4 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Plan Area Proposed Water Lines - 12” or Greater
Existing Water Lines Proposed Water Lines - 8”
Proposed Water Well
NOTE: STREET LINE WORK OMITTED FOR CLARITY
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
FIGURE 7-1 FIGURE 7-1 Proposed Water Improvements Proposed Water Improvements Note: Street line work omitted for clarity.
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-5
TABLE 7-2 Comparison of General Plan (GP) and Specific Plan (SP) Anticipated Water Usage per Land Use Classification
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AND ABBREVIATION
GP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
SP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
USAGE
Δ (%)
Public Facilities -
PG&E Substation pqge 0.007 0.007 0%
Public Facilities -
Hospital pqmh 0.027 0.027 0%
Public Facilities
- Elementary
School
pse 0.098 0.047 -52%
Public Facilities -
Middle School psm 0.166 0.101 -39%
Public Facilities -
Water Recharge pwrb 0.000 0.000 0%
Residential High
Density rh 0.079 0.000 -100%
Residential Low
Density rl 0.066 0.066 0%
Residential
Medium Density rm 3.106 3.277 6%
Residential
Medium High
Density
rmh 0.143 0.000 -100%
Residential
Medium Low
Density
rml 1.443 1.382 -4%
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
Density
run 0.482 0.569 18%
Total 7.063 7.411 5%
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AND ABBREVIATION
GP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
SP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
USAGE
Δ (%)
Employment -
Business Park cbp 0.289 0.0 -100%
Commercial -
Community cc 0.102 0.187 83%
Commercial -
General cgh 0.001 0.001 0%
Corridor/Center
Mixed-Use cmx 0.118 0.164 39%
Employment -
Office co 0.027 0.331 1110%
Commercial -
Regional cr 0.065 0.108 66%
Clear Zone cz 0.000 0.000 0%
Commercial -
Highway & Auto hwy 0.000 0.000 0%
Industrial -
Heavy ih 0.044 0.000 -100%
Industrial - Light il 0.195 0.000 -100%
Neighborhood
Mixed-Use nmx 0.000 0.409 100%
Open Space -
Ponding Basin obp 0.051 0.052 2%
Open Space -
Park orp 0.005 0.002 -54%
Open Space -
Community Park orpc 0.072 0.002 -96%
Open Space -
Neighborhood
Park
orpn 0.067 0.007 -90%
Open Space -
Regional Park orpr 0.369 0.202 -38%
Public Facilities -
Airport pa 0.003 0.003 0%
Public Facilities -
College pc 0.000 0.066 100%
Public Facilities pf 0.051 0.234 358%
Public Facilities
- Neighborhood
Center
pnc 0.007 0.007 0%
Public Facilities -
Church pqch 0.002 0.000 -100%
Note: The symbol Δ indicates the delta or change compared between the General Plan and Southwest Fresno Specific Plan.
7-6 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
WASTEWATER
The Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility (RWRF) serves the Plan Area.
Wastewater generated from homes and businesses
in the Fresno/Clovis metro area travels through
1,500 miles of sanitary sewer lines to the facility. The RWRF is located at Jensen and Cornelia Avenues near Southwest Fresno, approximately
three miles west of the Plan Area. Currently, the
City of Fresno’s wastewater collection in the Plan
Area has over 100 miles of sewer lines ranging in
size from six inches to 60 inches in diameter and
four sewage lift stations. The Plan Area is currently
planned to be served by four separate sewer areas.
A Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study may be required
prior to development. Cost of this planning effort
is not included in the cost estimates provided in
this section of the report. Figure 7-2 illustrates the
existing and proposed wastewater systems.
Some areas in the Plan Area utilize septic systems.
New development in the Plan Area will provide
outlying areas, which are not currently served with
sewer collection, the opportunity to connect to the
City’s sewer system. Developers will be required to
build, or contribute towards design and construction, of collection systems sufficient to serve the ultimate required capacity at Plan buildout.
For purposes of preparing the Plan, the existing
systems and the added sewer requirements, based
upon proposed land uses, have been considered.
A combination gravity flow and force main system
is assumed and reflected in the estimates. The
current configuration utilizes four lift stations in
the service area. The existing four stations will be
upgraded and two additional stations have been
included for this Plan. Alternative wastewater
conveyance systems will also be explored. One
such alternative will be a combined gravity and lift
station system where the majority of the Plan Area
would gravity flow to the regional treatment plant.
Table 7-3 compares the anticipated wastewater
generated per land use in the Plan to those in the
General Plan.
RECYCLED WATER USE
Recycled water, an important water source for the
City of Fresno, is not yet utilized in the Plan Area.
The Plan presents an opportunity to integrate recycled water use into the associated improvements with buildout of the City of Fresno’s recycled water
system. Green field installation of a distribution
system at the initial development stage provides
opportunity to plan optimum recycled water
utilization within the Plan Area. The conceptual
plans for the recycled water distribution system are
shown in Figure 7-3. The recycled water plans are
one area where the planned system was increased.
The City park in the southwest portion of the Plan
Area was not planned to be served by the recycled
water system. Cost of a line to service this property
has been included in the cost estimate.
STORM SYSTEM
The FMFCD serves both the existing City and
County area with inlets, pipes and storage basins
which provide flood control for the area. There are
currently 14 drainage areas established in whole
or part within the Plan Area. The drainage analysis
covers 5,246 acres of the Plan Area and adjacent
Sphere of Influence area. An additional area of 613
acres was studied and comprised of (1) upstream
tributary areas which drain into the Plan Area and
(2) additional drainage basin area downstream
of the Plan Area where Plan Area water flows to
basins outside the Plan Area. Figure 7-4 illustrates
the existing and proposed storm water systems.
FMFCD has based planning for the 14 drainage
areas using the General Plan land use classifications
for each drainage area. Beyond planning, the basins
have been located, sized and in most cases basin
property acquisition has been completed. The Plan
must be analyzed and evaluated for impacts on
the aggregate area as well as for each of the 14
planned basin areas. FMFCD guidelines allow a 20
percent change in required volume before FMFCD
is required to resize the basin and either enlarge
or change the location of the affected basin. The
analysis in Table 7-4 shows all of the 14 FMFCD
drainage basins are sized sufficiently for the Plan as
compared to the General Plan.
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-7
Proposed Wastewater Lines - 12” or Greater
Existing Wastewater Lines Proposed Sewer Capital Enhancement Existing Wastewater
Lift Station
Proposed Wastewater Lines - 8”
Plan Area
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
FIGURE 7-2 FIGURE 7-2 Proposed Wastewater Improvements Proposed Wastewater Improvements Note: Street line work omitted for clarity.
7-8 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
TABLE 7-3 Comparison of General Plan (GP) and Specific Plan (SP) Anticipated Wastewater Usage per Land Use Classification
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AND ABBREVIATION
GP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
SP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
USAGE
Δ (%)
Employment -
Business Park cbp 0.136 0.000 -100%
Commercial -
Community cc 0.048 0.088 83%
Commercial -
General cgh 0.000 0.000 0%
Corridor/Center
Mixed-Use cmx 0.249 0.347 39%
Employment -
Office co 0.016 0.195 1110%
Commercial -
Regional cr 0.036 0.060 66%
Clear Zone cz 0.000 0.000 0%
Commercial -
Highway & Auto hwy 0.000 0.000 0%
Industrial - Heavy ih 0.042 0.000 -100%
Industrial - Light il 0.130 0.000 -100%
Neighborhood
Mixed-Use nmx 0.000 0.273 100%
Open Space -
Ponding Basin obp 0.051 0.052 2%
Open Space -
Park orp 0.001 0.000 -100%
Open Space -
Community Park orpc 0.024 0.001 -96%
Open Space -
Neighborhood
Park
orpn 0.000 0.000 0%
Open Space -
Regional Park orpr 0.369 0.229 -38%
Public Facilities -
Airport pa 0.001 0.001 0%
Public Facilities -
College pc 0.000 0.033 100%
Public Facilities pf 0.018 0.082 358%
Public Facilities
- Neighborhood
Center
pnc 0.002 0.002 0%
Public Facilities -
Church pqch 0.001 0.000 -100%
LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION
AND ABBREVIATION
GP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
SP
WATER
USAGE
(MGPD)
USAGE
Δ (%)
Public Facilities -
PG&E Substation pqge 0.002 0.002 0%
Public Facilities -
Hospital pqmh 0.020 0.020 0%
Public Facilities
- Elementary
School
pse 0.026 0.013 -52%
Public Facilities -
Middle School psm 0.045 0.027 -39%
Public Facilities -
Water Recharge pwrb 0.000 0.000 0%
Residential High
Density rh 0.075 0.000 -100%
Residential Low
Density rl 0.025 0.025 0%
Residential
Medium Density rm 0.745 0.786 6%
Residential
Medium High
Density
rmh 0.090 0.095 5%
Residential
Medium Low
Density
rml 0.909 0.870 -4%
Residential
Urban
Neighborhood
Density
run 0.364 0.429 18%
Total 3.118 3.436 10%
Note: The symbol Δ indicates the delta or change compared between the General Plan and Southwest Fresno Specific Plan.
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-9
Proposed Recycled Water Lines
Existing Street Existing Basins
Plan Area
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
FIGURE 7-3 Proposed Recycled Water Improvements FIGURE 7-3 Proposed Recycled Water Improvements Note: Street line work omitted for clarity.
7-10 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Note: Street line work omitted for clarity.
Proposed Storm Drain Lines
Existing Street Existing Basins
Plan Area
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
FIGURE 7-4 Proposed Stormwater Improvements
AS
NN
ZZ
RR3
RR1
FFFF
OO
TT1
TT2
II1
SS AU
KK
LL
CQ
AV
AW2
FIGURE 7-4 Proposed Stormwater Improvements
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-11
IRRIGATION
The FID currently serves portions of the Plan Area.
Irrigation water is provided by six FID facilities
including the Kearney Avenue Basin No. 189 and
five canal and/or pipeline facilities. While no
additional capacity is required with implementation
of the Plan, the irrigation system remains a factor
and in place for three important reasons.
1. Existing service is required throughout
the development period. In-holdings and
undeveloped parcels still require irrigation
water.
2. Irrigation facilities serve as a water
transmission function across the area.
This transmission capacity will be required
following full buildout of the Plan.
3. The FID irrigation system serves a dual
function: A) delivery of irrigation water,
and B) storm water transmission during the
wet season. The irrigation facilities serve a
vital role in the storm water system as that
capacity for conveying irrigation water is
utilized to convey storm water during the
wet season.
Improvements in the irrigation system will be
required with implementation of the Plan.
Modifications will be required so that facilities are
consistent with a developed urban context. These
improvement costs are not controlled nor borne by
the FID, but by developers which lead in determining both the scope and cost of the associated improvements. Those costs are included in general
improvement budgets such as street construction
and storm water projects. This is appropriate as
no primary irrigation benefit accrues to the utility
owner. The requirements of the final design are
principally a function of the property developer.
As a rule, the FID easement generally remains
but whether a canal is preserved as-is, improved,
or replaced with a pipeline is determined by the
developer of the project. FID is an interested
participant and remains the facility owner involved
in planning, design, and approving improvements,
but scope and costs for these improvements are
included in the development projects.
TABLE 7-4 Comparison of Existing and
Required Basin Volumes for General
Plan (GP) and Specific Plan (SP)
DRAINAGE
AREA
BASIN
SIZE
(ACRES)
GP
REQUIRED
BASIN
VOLUME
(ACREFEET)
SP
REQUIRED
BASIN
VOLUME
(ACREFEET)
Δ(%)
Basin AR 0.5 0.23 0.23 0.0%
Basin AS 637 126.06 130.79 3.8%
Basin AU 376 70.76 81.07 14.6%
Basin AV 526 178.00 148.92 -16.3%
Basin CE 0 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Basin CP 311 61.97 53.82 -13.2%
Basin CQ 220 46.76 52.25 11.8%
Basin FF 273 62.68 62.68 0.0%
Basin II1 168 39.88 41.51 4.1%
Basin KK 250 79.83 73.61 -7.8%
Basin NN 789 170.92 163.35 -4.4%
Basin OO 113 33.49 33.46 0.0%
Basin RR 12.4 1.41 1.41 0.0%
Basin SS 520 117.44 119.28 1.6%
Basin TT 563 140.39 138.85 -3.9%
Basin ZZ 225 57.59 61.34 6.5%
EXEMPT 101 43.86 43.74 -.3%
OUT OF
DRAINAGE
AREA
774 115.03 144.97 26.0%
Total 5,859 1,346.3 1347.3 0.1%
Note: The symbol Δ indicates the delta or change compared between the General Plan and Southwest Fresno Specific Plan.
7-12 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
C. DRY UTILITIES NEEDS
ANALYSIS AND
IMPROVEMENTS
ELECTRICAL
The Plan Area is currently serviced by PG&E, who
operates and maintains transmission, switching
substation(s), and distribution lines to serve
the Plan Area. Implementation of the Plan will
require expansion of the electrical distribution
and transmission related facilities; this is not a
change from what was anticipated in the General
Plan. In addition to adding new distribution feeds,
the range of electric system improvements
needed to accommodate growth may include
upgrading existing substation and transmission
line equipment, expanding existing substation(s)
to their ultimate build-out capacity, building new
substations and interconnecting transmission lines.
The new development will be responsible for the
costs associated with the necessary expansion and
upgrading of the systems.
GAS SYSTEMS
PG&E also operates and maintains natural gas
transmission and distribution lines within the
project site. Implementation of the Plan will require
the expansion of distribution and gas transmission
and related facilities to serve the Plan Area. The
new development will be responsible for the costs
associated with the necessary expansion and
upgrading of these systems.
D. COMMUNICATIONS
AT&T, Comcast, and Xfinity (all AT&T companies)
provide telephone, fiber, and cable services to
the Plan Area. Implementation of the Plan will
require expansion of communications systems to
serve the Plan Area. The new development will be
responsible for the costs associated with the necessary expansion and upgrading of any authorized systems.
Chapter 7 | Utilities 7-13
E. GOALS AND POLICIES
Goal U-1 Maintain, and if necessary,
upgrade and augment utilities
to support new development
within the Plan Area and protect
the health, safety, and welfare of
existing and new residents and
businesses.
Policy U-1.1 Coordinate the installation and
upgrading of utilities between the
City and County.
Policy U-1.2 Connect utilities, especially in
previously undeveloped outlying
areas, to the City’s existing utility
system as a part of new development.
Policy U-1.3 Require developers to build or
contribute towards the design
and construction of expanded and
upgraded utilities to serve new
development projects such as
sewer collection systems, electric
system improvements, communication systems, and natural gas transmission and distribution lines.
Policy U-1.4 Maintain a sustainable, safe and
effective wet utilities system,
including wastewater, recycled
water, and irrigation, to provide a
high level of wet utilities while also
meeting high environmental quality
standards.
Policy U-1.5 Provide adequate sewage treatment and disposal by utilizing the City of Fresno’s regional wastewater treatment plant for all existing and new development within the
Plan Area.
Policy U-1.6 Explore the opportunity to
integrate recycled water use into
the associated improvements with
buildout of the City’s recycled water system, including the potential installation of a distribution system
on green field.
Policy U-1.7 Require that all new arterial street
construction include undergrounding of electrical service and communications lines.
7-14 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-1
IMPLEMENTATION
A. INTRODUCTION
Private property owners and developers will
undertake much of the work and make most of
the investment needed to realize the vision for
the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (the Plan).
Chapter 3, Land Use, and Chapter 4, Development
Regulations, of the Plan will guide and regulate
new development to ensure that it achieves the
community’s vision.
The private development, however, will require
investments in public facilities and infrastructure—
complete streets, water and sewer, stormwater
drainage, and community parks. This chapter establishes the funding and financing strategies that the City will use to ensure that new development pays
its fair share of the costs for public facilities and
services. The provisions included in this chapter
incorporate existing City requirements, including
development impact fees and community facilities
districts for development projects.
The community’s vision includes not just areas
planned for new development but also the existing neighborhoods and commercial corridors.
However, without development impact fees, the
existing neighborhoods could be waiting a long
time for their share of the City’s general fund
to pay for improvements to public facilities and
infrastructure. Thus, this chapter also identifies
tools with which neighborhoods can help pay to get
improvements sooner rather than later.
Finally, the community that residents experience is
much more than streets and buildings, even though
the Plan, by its nature, focuses on the built environment. Therefore, this chapter presents several economic development strategies through which
residents can increase their economic security and
enhance the community’s quality of life.
8 This chapter is organized into the following
sections:
A. Introduction
B. General Implementation Strategy
C. Funding and Financing Tools
D. Economic Development Strategies
E. Implementation Action Plan
This chapter provides a framework for
implementation. Even though parts of it provide
specific details, it is still just a framework. It is fully expected that as conditions and market forces
change over time, the City may adjust the details
as needed to keep working toward the vision for
Southwest Fresno.
8-2 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
B. GENERAL
IMPLEMENTATION
STRATEGY
PRINCIPLES
The general approach to implementing the Plan
incorporates several guiding principles:
■ Development Needs to Pay Its Own Way.
The City of Fresno will not subsidize new
development. Development projects will pay
their fair share for public facilities and services
using developer-constructed improvements,
development impact fees (DIFs), community
facilities districts (CFDs), or other funding and
financing mechanisms.
■ The Purpose of the Specific Plan is to Attract
Investment and Development. The community
wants new investment and new development:
attractive neighborhoods, vibrant commercial
districts, and a pleasant and appealing public
realm. Development standards, DIFs, and other
requirements should not be so onerous as to
inhibit or discourage the new development
that the community desires.
■ Public Facility and Infrastructure
Improvements are Needed in Existing
Neighborhoods. The Plan should provide
ways to improve the public facilities and
infrastructure in existing neighborhoods
and commercial areas to a similar quality as
will be required for new neighborhoods and
commercial areas. However, it is recognized
that there are funding constraints and
improvements to existing neighborhoods and
commercial areas may take time.
■ Implementation Should be Coordinated with
the Annual Budget Process. To avoid being
the proverbial plan on a shelf, implementation
must be coordinated with the City’s annual
budget process. The implementation
framework should be laid out by fiscal year to
ensure that individual implementation actions
can be programed into departmental work
programs and that adequate funding can be
budgeted each year.
■ Infill Development Projects Are Important
to Catalyze Buildout of the Specific Plan. The
City should incentivize initial infill development
projects to prove the market demand for
infill projects in the plan area. Incentives
could include fee waivers, support for grant
applications, and shifting of some costs to
assessment districts.
■ Programs and Services are as Important
to the Vision as Streets and Buildings. The
implementation plan should include necessary
programs and services, not just capital
investments for facilities and infrastructure.
■ Ongoing Operations and Maintenance is as
Important as Constructing Improvements. The
Plan needs to provide a mechanism to pay for
ongoing operations and maintenance for new
or improved public facilities and services.
■ Development of the Plan Does Not Require
the Use of Eminent Domain. The Plan does
not contemplate the broad-spread use of
eminent domain as an implementation tool as
there is an abundant amount of vacant land to
accommodate proposed new uses. However
sometimes eminent domain may be used as a
last resort to widen a street or acquire a school
site, for example.
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
To oversee the implementation of the Plan, the
City should establish an implementation oversight
committee comprised of residents, businesses, and
representatives of civic organizations in the Plan
Area. At a minimum, this committee should collaborate with City staff to prepare an annual report to the Mayor and City Council on the progress of
implementation and recommending subsequent
implementation measures, including future capital
improvements. Beyond the annual report, the
City may want to consider tasking this committee
with reviewing and commenting on proposed
development projects. The City could also task this
committee with responsibilities related to branding
and marketing the Southwest Fresno community.
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-3
C. FUNDING AND
FINANCING TOOLS
This section identifies the funding and financing
tools that are anticipated to be used for implementing the Plan. This list is not exhaustive, and new tools may be made available by the legislature.
If a new or different funding or financing tool is
available at the time of implementation, the most
effective tool should be used.
ESTIMATED INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS
In preparing the Plan, the costs to provide major
infrastructure were estimated. Table 8-1 below
provides the rough cost estimates for the Plan
Area. In addition, Table 8-1 provides rough cost
estimates to provide infrastructure for buildout of
the adjacent areas that are within the City’s Sphere
of Influence (SOI). The funding and financing tools
and the implementation action plan are focused on
the infrastructure and estimated costs in the Plan
Area.
However, the cost for infrastructure in the adjacent
SOI areas are provided for context in case future
applications are filed to annex SOI areas into the
city limit. Specific costs and the mechanism to
pay for those costs will need to be decided on a
case-by-case basis for each annexation that is filed.
NEW DEVELOPMENT
Developer-Constructed/Funded
Improvements
For public facilities and infrastructure on or
adjacent to a site proposed for development or
new construction, the preferred method to pay for
the improvements is for the developer to construct
or pay for the improvement as a condition of
approval.
In some cases, the development of one or more
parcels in the Plan Area may require the construction of off-site infrastructure improvements, the size of which may be larger than what is needed
to serve just the proposed development. In such
cases, if the City does not have the funds available
to pay for the additional infrastructure capacity, the
property owner or developer may agree, through a
development agreement, to pay for the full cost of
the off-site infrastructure improvement and to be
repaid as additional development occurs.
The development agreement would stipulate the
terms of such repayment. If the cost of infrastructure improvements is to be repaid to a property owner, developer, or other entity that paid the
upfront cost, the City may prohibit other development under the Plan until the project applicant has paid the required infrastructure cost repayment fee
in accordance with the terms of the development
agreement.
TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE ESTIMATED COST (PLAN AREA) ESTIMATED COST (SOI) Water $21,611,000 $22,289,000
Recycled Water $2,336,000 $2,184,000
Storm Drain $13,722,000 $6,862,000
WasteWater $22,951,000 $24,711,000
General Costs $6,062,000 $5,605,000
TOTAL $66,682,000 $61,651,000
TABLE 8-1 Estimated Wet Infrastructure Costs
8-4 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Development Impact Fees
Development impact fees (DIFs) are a one-time
charge to new development imposed under the
Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code,
Section 66000, et seq.). These fees are charged
to new development to mitigate impacts resulting
from the development activity, and cannot be used
to fund existing deficiencies. This means that new
development can only pay for part of the improvement cost for projects that benefit existing uses as well as new development and the City must find
another funding source to cover the costs for the
improvements that benefit the existing uses.
Impact fees must be adopted based on findings
of reasonable relationships between the development paying the fee, the need for the fee, and the use of fee revenues. The City of Fresno has DIFs
for police, fire, parks, and streets impacts. The
implementation plan calls for the City to update
the impact fees for the Plan Area based on updated
infrastructure cost estimates.
The City can allow for credits and reimbursements
for capital projects funded by an impact fee that
are constructed privately by developers and
dedicated to the City. Depending on the specific
implementation guidelines of the fee program,
a development project could choose to dedicate
land or make certain improvements and receive
a credit against the impact fee due. A “credit” is
the amount counted against the developer’s fee
obligation. A “reimbursement” is the amount that
exceeds the developer’s fee obligation.
Because each development pays only for its fair
share of a public facility or infrastructure improvement, the City may not have the necessary funding to pay for improvements until other developments
are approved and constructed. If the City has funds
available, it can construct the improvements and
get repaid over time. If the City does not have
funds available, it might be the case that a community facilities district, which can bond against future revenue, would be a better funding mechanism
than a DIF.
Community Facilities District
Community facilities districts (CFDs) can fund the
planning, design, purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, or rehabilitation of capital facilities, defined as having a useful life of five or
more years. CFDs can also fund the provision of
a variety of public services, such as public safety,
parks and recreation, schools, library and cultural
facilities, landscape maintenance and lighting, flood
control, and site remediation.
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of
1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.)
authorizes the establishment of CFDs. CFDs levy a
special tax. This tax may be applied to the value of
each property, rather than assessed based on the
level of special benefit received. However, because
it is a special tax, a two-thirds majority vote is
required to approve the levy of the special tax. If
the district has twelve or more registered voters,
the election polls voters, with each having an equal
vote. If there are less than twelve registered voters,
the election polls property owners, with each vote
weighted by acreage owned within the district
boundary. Properties within the district need not
necessarily be contiguous. Finally, establishing
a CFD requires only a general description of the
facilities, services, and costs associated with the
district, not the detailed engineer’s report required
for assessment districts.
CFDs may fund the construction of the following
types of facilities:
■ Local park, recreation, parkway, and openspace facilities ■ Elementary and secondary school sites and
structures
■ Libraries
■ Childcare facilities
■ Transmission/distribution facilities for water,
natural gas, telephone, electrical energy, and
cable television
■ Flood, storm protection, and storm drainage
facilities
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-5
■ Other governmental facilities the legislative
body creating the district is authorized by law
to contribute revenue toward, construct, own,
or operate
■ Work to bring public or private buildings or real
property into compliance with seismic safety
standards and regulations
■ CFDs may also fund the following types of
services:
■ Police protection services
■ Fire protection and suppression services and
ambulance and paramedic services
■ Recreation program services, library services,
maintenance services for elementary and
secondary school sites and structures, and the
operation and maintenance of museums and
cultural facilities
■ Maintenance of parks, parkways, and open
space
■ Flood and storm protection services including,
but not limited to, the operation and
maintenance of storm drainage systems and
sandstorm protection systems
■ Removal or remedial action services for the
cleanup of any hazardous substance released
or threatened to be released into the environment
One key advantage of a CFD is that it can issue
bonds, secured by the anticipated future tax
revenue. This allows improvements to be constructed sooner, rather than later. They can also be beneficial to developers because they do not
have to recoup the cost of the improvements from
the sales price of each new house or building. In
contrast, with DIFs, the developer borrows the
cost of the DIFs and must reflect that cost in the
sales price. Finally, unlike other types of bonds,
it is the CFD and ultimately the property owners
responsible for repaying the bonds. The City is not
directly liable.
Enhanced Infrastructure Finance Districts
Legislation in 2015 enabled the formation of
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts
(EIFDs). An EIFD diverts local property tax revenues
(through tax-increment financing) to either pay
directly for the construction of infrastructure and
public facility improvements, or to issue bonds to
finance those improvements. No public vote is required to establish an EIFD, but a 55 percent voter approval is required to issue bonds. However, EIFDs
cannot divert property tax increment revenues
from schools and can only capture tax increment
from taxing jurisdictions that agree to forego their
incremental property tax revenue. In the case of
Southwest Fresno, the City of Fresno would need
to agree to forego the increase in property tax
revenue that is generated by increase in property
values in the EIFD.
EIFDs can fund:
■ Roads, highways and bridges
■ Parking facilities
■ Transit stations
■ Sewage and water facilities
■ Flood control and drainage projects
■ Solid waste disposal
■ Parks and libraries
■ Child care facilities
■ Brownfield restoration
■ Environmental mitigation
■ Military base reuse projects
■ Affordable housing
■ Private industrial buildings
■ Transit oriented development projects
■ Projects carrying out sustainable community
strategies
8-6 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
The preceding funding and financing mechanisms
can technically be used for improvements in
existing neighborhoods and commercial areas.
However, the developer constructed/funded
improvements and DIFs would only apply to new
infill development projects, and CFDs and EIFDs
may prove unworkable because they must be approved by voters in the district. The tools described below have more relevance for funding and
financing improvements in existing neighborhoods
and commercial areas.
General Fund
The most direct way to fund public facilities and
infrastructure improvements in existing neighborhoods and commercial areas is through the City’s general fund. However, implementation projects
in Southwest Fresno must compete with demands
for general fund investment in every other part of
the City. Furthermore, the amount of funding that
might be available through the general fund could
be quite limited.
Assessment Districts
In existing neighborhoods and commercial areas,
groups of property owners may desire to have
public facilities and infrastructure improvements
sooner rather than waiting for general fund monies
to become available. Assessment districts could
help finance the construction of public improvements on public property, public rights-of-way, and public easements in these areas.
The public must pay for the portions of the
improvements that provide general benefit to the
public at large, but real property that receives
a special benefit may be assessed for the costs,
proportional to the level of benefit received. Three
different provisions of state law authorize assessment:
■ Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Streets and
Highways Code Sections 8500 et seq.)
■ Improvement Act of 1911 (Streets and Highways Code Sections 5000 et seq.) ■ Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Streets
and Highways Code Sections 10000 et seq.),
which contains only provisions for establishing
assessment districts
Assessment districts are intended to finance
construction of physical improvements. They
cannot pay for operations and maintenance or
additional services. If additional improvements are
desired after an assessment district is established,
the entire process is required for those additional
improvements.
Assessment districts may be used to finance
improvements in one of two general ways: 1) the
assessments may repay the City for the upfront
costs of improvements and 2) the City may also
issue bonds pursuant to an assessment district
and use the proceeds to fund the infrastructure
improvements and use the assessments to repay
the bonds.
Generally, assessment districts can be used to
finance these improvements:
■ Local streets
■ Streetlights
■ Parks
■ Water supply and distribution facilities
■ Gas and electric power
■ Landscaping
■ Sidewalks
■ Sanitary sewers
■ Flood control and drainage improvements
■ Parking facilities
The authorizing statutes referenced above set forth
procedures for establishing assessment districts.
Under existing State law, however, establishment of
an assessment district cannot occur if a majority of
the affected property owners object (weighted by
the value of the proposed assessment).
Prior to holding a vote on an assessment district,
the City must pay for engineering design and
construction documents and bid the project out. If
a majority of property owners rejects the assessment district, then the City is responsible for the Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-7
cost of developing the construction documents.
Thus, establishing an assessment district usually
requires a great deal of time working with property
owners so that the City is relatively certain that
they will not vote against establishing the district.
Contractual Assessment District
In a typical assessment district, a municipality
determines the cost of public improvements and
places a levy on each property in the area unless
a majority of property owners object. In contrast,
a contractual assessment district is completely
voluntary. A contractual assessment district could
be an alternative when a majority of property owners in an area do not want to pay for public facility and infrastructure improvements, but a sizeable
number of them do.
A municipality establishes a contractual assessment
district program, creating guidelines that identify
the types of improvements, costs, and locations. If
and when a property owner wants to participate,
the owner can voluntarily enter into a contractual
assessment. Because the program is completely
voluntary and because it applies to only one
property at a time, there is no voting, balloting,
or engineer’s report, as is required with a conventional assessment district. Typically, the program authorizes the City Manager or some other staff
position to execute the contract on behalf of the
City, thus eliminating the need for a public hearing.
These assessments are authorized by Contractual
Assessments (part of the Improvement Act of 1911)
(Streets and Highways Code Sections 5898.10 et
seq.). Although this authority has existed for 100
years, this code section became better known
with the passage of AB 811 (2008, Levine), which
amended the code to allow contractual assessments to pay for energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements, most commonly for residential solar energy retrofits.
To establish a contractual assessment district,
the City Council would first adopt a resolution
indicating its intention to do so. The resolution of
intention should:
■ Include a statement that the City proposes
to make voluntary contractual assessment
financing available to property owners
■ Identify the kinds of public works that may be
financed
■ Describe the boundaries of the area within
which voluntary contractual assessments may
be entered into
■ Briefly describe the proposed arrangements
for financing the program, including a brief
description of criteria for determining the
creditworthiness of a property owner
Prior to the public hearing to adopt a resolution,
which establishes the contractual assessment
district, the City would have to prepare a report
containing:
■ A map showing the boundaries of the
territory within which voluntary contractual
assessments are proposed to be offered
■ A draft contract specifying the terms and
conditions that would be agreed to by
a property owner within the voluntary
contractual assessment area and the City
■ A statement of City policies concerning
voluntary contractual assessments including:
■ Identification of types of improvements that
may be financed through the use of contractual
assessments
■ Identification of a City official authorized to
enter into voluntary contractual assessments
on behalf of the City
■ A maximum aggregate dollar amount of
voluntary contractual assessments
■ A method for setting requests from property
owners for financing through voluntary
contractual assessments in priority order in the
event that requests appear likely to exceed the
authorization amount
■ A plan for raising a capital amount required to
pay for work performed pursuant to voluntary
contractual assessments. The plan may include
8-8 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
amounts to be advanced by the public agency
through funds available to it from any source.
The plan may include the sale of a bond or
bonds or other financing relationship.
■ The plan shall include a statement of or
method for determining the interest rate and
time period during which contracting property
owners would pay any assessment. The plan
shall provide for any reserve fund or funds.
The plan shall provide for the apportionment
of all or any portion of the costs incidental to
financing, administration, and collection of
the voluntary contractual assessment program
among the consenting property owners and
the City.
The authorizing statue provides other requirements
as well as the standards for noticing and conducting
a required public hearing.
ONGOING OPERATIONS AND
MAINTENANCE
Whether in new development areas or existing
neighborhoods, public facility and infrastructure
improvements will require ongoing operations and
maintenance. Landscaping and lighting maintenance districts (LLMD) can fund the construction of certain public improvements and the operation and
maintenance of public improvements. A landscaping and lighting maintenance district is one alternative to the general fund for paying those costs.
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
District
LLMDs could be an effective way to fund the
ongoing maintenance (or even the construction) of
public realm improvements. LLMDs are authorized
by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
(Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq.).
An LLMD requires an annual assessment process
for any assessments other than previously approved assessments to pay previously approved and issued debt. The annual assessment process
is similar to that used to establish assessment
districts.
The improvements and services provided by
LLMDs include:
■ Landscaping
■ Statuary, fountains, and other ornamental
structures
■ Public lighting, including traffic signals
■ Appurtenant facilities, including grading,
clearing, and removal of debris; the installation
or construction of curbs, gutters, walls,
sidewalks, or paving; or water, irrigation,
drainage, or electrical facilities
■ Park or recreational improvements
■ Land preparation
■ Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and
public restrooms
■ The maintenance or servicing or both of any of
the foregoing
■ Acquisition of land for park, recreational, or
open-space purposes
■ Acquisition of existing improvements
■ Acquisition or construction of any community
center, municipal auditorium or hall, or similar
public facility for the indoor presentation of
performances, shows, stage productions, fairs,
conventions, exhibitions, pageants, meetings,
parties, or other group events, activities, or
functions, whether those events, activities, or
functions are public or private
LLMDs can be expanded over time, following a
process similar to that used to establish the district.
The City may condition development activity in
the Plan Area on annexation into a LLMD if one
is established for all or a part of the Plan Area.
An LLMD may also be established to generate
revenues from throughout the Plan Area to fund
the operation and maintenance of a public open
space in or around the Plan Area.
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-9
STATE FUNDING SOURCES
The following describes state funds that could be
used for transportation-related projects. They are
available from the Transportation Development
Act (TDA) and from various state programs and
agencies, including the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Office
of Traffic Safety (OTS).
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant
Program – Sustainable Communities
The Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant is a
new program consolidating and realigning previous
Caltrans funding programs. Caltrans Environmental
Justice & Community-Based Transportation Planning Grants, and Transit Planning Grants merged into one program, “Sustainable Communities.”
Similar to the previous programs, transportation
planning projects that are intended to improve a
multimodal transportation network and reduce
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as complete
street plans and pedestrian and bicycle safety
enhancement plans, are eligible. Construction
and maintenance projects are not eligible.
Eligible applicants include Metropolitan Planning
Organizations and Regional Transportation Planning
Agencies (MPO/RTPAs), Transit Agencies, Cities,
Counties, and Native American Tribal Governments.
This program is funded by the Federal Transit
Administration and the State Highway Account.
Approximately $8.3 million was available for the
grant cycle (Fiscal Year 2015-16). At least an 11.47
percent local match is required.
More information is available at: http://www.dot.
ca.gov/hq/tpp/grants.html/.
Office of Traffic Safety Grants
The Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) administers federal
traffic safety grant funds that are apportioned
to California under the National Highway Safety
Act. The OTS has several priority areas for grant
funding, including alcohol and other drugs, police
traffic services, occupant protection, traffic records, emergency medical services, roadway safety,
pedestrian and bicycle safety (including education,
enforcement, and engineering), and motorcycle
safety. The OTS supports a wide variety of traffic
safety programs, including pedestrian and bicycle
safety programs for children; child passenger safety
outreach; and support for increased law enforcement services and resources, such as safety helmet distribution, and court diversion programs for
safety helmet violators. State government agencies,
state colleges, and state universities, local city
and county government agencies, school districts,
fire departments, and public emergency services
providers are eligible to apply for and receive OTS
grant funding. Grants are awarded on a competitive
basis.
More information is available at: http://www.ots.
ca.gov/ots_and_traffic_safety/About_OTS.asp./
Environmental Enhancement and
Mitigation Program
The Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation
Program (EEMP) is a state fund established by
Caltrans to mitigate the effects of transportation
projects. It offers up to $7 million each year for
grants to local, state, and federal government agencies and to nonprofit organizations for projects to mitigate the environmental impacts caused by new
or modified public transportation facilities. Eligible
projects must be directly or indirectly related to
the environmental impact of the modification of an
existing transportation facility or construction of
a new transportation facility. Typical grants range
from $200,000 to $250,000. Up to 25 percent local
matching is usually required. Grants are awarded
in the categories of urban forestry, resource lands,
and mitigation projects beyond the scope of the
lead agency. Grants are awarded on a competitive
basis.
More information is available at: http://resources.
ca.gov/bonds_and_grants/eemp/.
Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities Program
Managed by California’s Strategic Growth Council,
the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program is intended to reduce GHG emissions by supporting infill and compact
development projects that improve non-motorized
transportation options and decrease reliance
on auto vehicle uses. Eligible projects include 1)
8-10 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
transit-oriented development (TOD) projects that
include affordable housing development in conjunction with transportation infrastructure, and 2) integrated connectivity projects that include one or
more transit stop and would result in a significant
increase in transit ridership.
As of January 2015, the program guidelines for the
AHSC program are in the process of development,
and the draft of the guidelines is available here:
http://sgc.ca.gov/docs/Draft_AHSC_Guidelines_for_posting_082314.pdf/.
More information is available at: http://sgc.
ca.gov/s_ahscprogram.php/.
Urban And Community Forestry Grants
The California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection (CAL FIRE) administers the Urban &
Community Forestry Grant Program to fund urban
forestry projects that focus on reducing GHG emissions, including urban tree planting, urban forest management for GHG reduction, urban wood and
biomass utilization, reclamation of blighted urban
lands, and green innovations projects. On-going
management or maintenance activities are not
eligible.
D. ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGIES
BUSINESS STARTUP AND BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
Empirical evidence indicates that small businesses
and young businesses are the most productive job
creators.1
This suggests that investments in existing
businesses and startup businesses would be an
efficient approach to expand job opportunities in
the Plan Area and for Plan Area residents, to raise
household incomes and build household wealth,
and to help drive and sustain demand for nonresidential buildings and development.
Business Assistance
The federal and State governments already fund
the vast majority of investment in developing the
capacity of small businesses and startup businesses
through the organizations outlined in this section.
Although some additional funding may be necessary, the real value that local government and community organizations provide is connecting
small businesses and budding entrepreneurs with
economic development service providers.
The core economic development services that
assist small businesses and business startups are:
■ Creating and Updating Business Plans.
Perhaps the most overlooked, yet essential tool
small and new businesses lack is a business
plan. With a three- to five-year horizon, the
typical business plan provides: a description
of the firm and its organizational structure; a
description of products and services, including
lifecycle stage; an analysis of the market,
market trends going forward, and competition;
and strategies for product development,
marketing, and sales. A current business plan is
1 See, for example: Neumark, David, Brandon Wall, and Junfu Zhang, 2011, “Do Small Businesses Create More Jobs? New Evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 16–29; and Haltiwanger, John C., Jarmin, Ron S., and Miranda, Javier, 2010, “Who Creates Jobs? Small vs. Large vs. Young”, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 16300, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-11
necessary for businesses seeking financing, but
they are also critical for any business seeking to
grow revenues.
■ Business Management Training. Many small
business owners are experts in their product or
service, but lack formal business management
training and expertise. Business management
training covers a range of topics, including
bookkeeping and accounting, hiring and
retention, workforce training, healthcare and
other employee benefits, work place safety,
and compliance with human resource, taxes,
and other regulatory requirements.
■ Marketing and Advertising. Large businesses
have dedicated budgets and full-time staff,
as well as outside consultants, for market
research in order to identify and understand
customers and their needs and desires.
They also have dedicated budgets for paid
advertising to promote their brand and their
products or services. Small businesses usually
lack the internal resources, but marketing and
advertising are still important components for
growing revenues.
■ Financing. Whether updating current business
premises, replacing machinery and equipment,
or expanding, most small businesses at some
point to need to access financing. Small
businesses often turn to banks for conventional
loans or Small Business Administration (SBA)-
guaranteed loans. Many of these businesses,
however, can benefit from assistance in putting
together the documentation needed to obtain
loans. Furthermore, conventional loans,
even when guaranteed by the SBA, require
equity from the business. Some economic
development service providers have programs
to help cover the gap between the equity
the business has available and that required
amount, and some providers also have direct
loan programs.
■ Workforce Hiring and Training. Most
businesses handle hiring and training in-house.
However, the Fresno Regional Workforce
Development Board (described in more detail
in the Existing Economic Development Service
Providers and the Labor Force Education and
Training sections of this chapter) can assist
businesses with a range of hiring services.
In addition, many businesses may be eligible
for workforce training provided through the
workforce development board when upgrading
equipment and processes.
■ Mentoring. Some businesses, and especially
business startups, benefit from mentoring.
Seasoned professionals and retired executives
can provide insights on putting together all the
pieces mentioned above, on leadership, and on
big-picture strategy.
■ Local Ombudsman. Small businesses
complying with municipal and county
regulations is less a matter of will and more a
matter of being able to navigate City Hall. Local
ombudsman services provide a single point
of contact to help businesses comply with
business licensing, health department permits,
zoning and code enforcement compliance
and other regulations administered at the
municipal and county level.
■ Starting a Business. Existing small businesses
may only need the service described above one
at a time. In contrast, entrepreneurs starting
businesses have to accomplish all these tasks
at once. In addition, startup businesses must
choose and establish a business structure,
register their business, select and secure a
location to operate their business, and obtain
required permits and licenses. Finally, new
businesses face more challenges obtaining
financing than do existing businesses with a
financial track record.
In addition to the core business assistance services
described above, there is wide variety of more
targeted businesses assistance services that can
assist some small businesses. Some of these other
services include technology transfer, patents and
trademarks, pricing practices, government procurement and contracts, and social media strategies.
These additional services will probably not be
applicable on a wide scale in the Plan Area, but
may be valuable to some individual businesses.
8-12 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Existing Economic Development Service
Providers
There are several economic development service
providers through which Plan Area businesses and
entrepreneurs can obtain the business assistance
services described in the preceding section. In
general, most of the services are funded through
the federal and State governments, although some
programs do have fees.
■ Fresno State Small Business Development
Center. The Fresno State Small Business
Development Center (SBDC) provides one-onone business consulting and training services for entrepreneurs in the counties of Fresno,
Madera, Tulare and Kings. Fresno State SBDC
is part of the UC Merced Small Business
Development Center Regional Network.
Fresno State SBDC assists existing businesses
with being competitive in a complex
marketplace and helps new entrepreneurs
realize their dream of business ownership.
It provides business consulting and training
in the following areas: business planning
and management, marketing, financial
management, specialized assistance with
international trade, technology transfer
and commercialization, distribution and
manufacturing, and business training
workshops, all at no cost to small businesses.
Fresno State SBDC would most likely be the
primary provider of most of the services
described in the Business Assistance section
above. More information about Fresno State
SBDC is available on its website: http://
fresnostate.edu/academics/sbdc/index.html/.
■ Fresno Regional Workforce Development
Board. The Fresno Regional Workforce
Development Board (FRWDB) provides
oversight and policy direction for the use of
federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act (WIOA) funds in Fresno Area. The FRWDB
is a business-led body, appointed by the
Fresno County Board of Supervisors. The
FRWDB, whose composition is defined by the
WIOA, includes 23 individuals representing
business, one-stop partners, communitybased organizations, local education entities, economic development agencies, and labor.
Under WOIA, the FRWDB provides services to
individuals seeking employment (described in
more detail in the Labor Force Education and
Training section) and to businesses, through its
Business Service Center. It can help businesses
to attract, hire, and retain employees,
specifically including:
§ Securing qualified, pre-screened job
candidates to meet a business’ hiring
specifications and goals;
§ Coordinating and customizing recruitment
events;
§ Locating labor market information and
current Fresno County employment
projections; and
§ Collecting information, such as wage data,
for job descriptions.
The FRWDB can provide information and
resources on starting a business, business
expansion, layoff aversion and business
transition strategies, one-on-one assistance
with business questions, and more. Like the
SBA (described below), the FRWDB provides
a large variety of online tutorials and tools,
ranging from industry specific toolkits, forms,
videos, e-newsletter notifications of trainings
and regulations, interactive assessments, online training courses and funding information.
The FRWDB can work with businesses facing
potential layoffs to develop transition strategies
and explore avenues to avert layoffs or
closures. If layoffs do occur, they can help make
the situation less traumatic for employees
and less costly for the business. Finally, the
FRWDB can help businesses with less than
100 employees create training courses and
reimburse costs under certain criteria.
The FRWDB operates its Business Services
Center at 7475 N. Palm Avenue in Fresno. More
information is available on the website, at
http://www.workforce-connection.com/.
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-13
■ Fresno Economic Development Corporation.
The Economic Development Corporation
serving Fresno County (Fresno EDC) is a
nonprofit organization established to market
Fresno County to and facilitate site selection
for new businesses within Fresno County.
Fresno EDC also assists in the retention and
expansion of businesses that are already
located in the area.
■ Fresno EDC collaborates with other economic
development service providers, including many
of those described in this chapter, to enhance
the stability and growth of Fresno County’s
existing companies by connecting them with
specific resources, information, and services.
These services include, but are not limited to:
§ Site selection assistance
§ Workforce development, screening, and
employee recruitment services
§ Financing and microloan programs
§ Customized training program development
§ Internship program information and referrals
§ Performance enhancement/skill building/skill
attainment training programs
§ Building contracting
§ Strategic/marketing/formal succession
planning
§ Lucrative business tax incentive information:
enterprise zone, empowerment zone, MRZ,
hub zone, and foreign trade zone
§ Utilities – incentives, rebates, special
programs, and energy rate analysis assistance
§ Assistance with city permits, zoning, and
licensing; other municipal services
§ Structure deterioration & blight aversion and
improvement of existing infrastructure
§ Research and development assistance
§ Certified Public Accountant (CPA) services
Fresno EDC is a membership organization with
investors from a wide variety of industries
and areas of Fresno County. Their office is at
906 N Street, Suite 120, in Downtown Fresno.
More information is available on the website at
http://www. fresnoedc.com/.
■ Mayor’s Office for Economic Development.
The City of Fresno facilitates economic
development through the Mayor’s Office for
Economic Development. The City provides
services and assistance across a variety of
economic development fronts. The City’s
approach to economic development includes:
§ Ensuring availability of land and
infrastructure for industrial development
§ Industrial business retention and expansion
program
§ Incentives for industrial development
§ Targeting the food production cluster
§ Marketing Fresno to potential new
businesses and investors
§ Establishing an export commission
§ Investments in workforce development and
adult education
§ Buy local initiative
§ Supporting and incentivizing infill and
redevelopment
§ Improving quality of life to attract and retain
professionals to live in Fresno
§ Using City-owned land for catalyst projects
§ Collaborating with regional economic
development partners
Several of the City’s economic development
services are relevant to business assistance
for existing businesses in the plan and for
Plan Area residents who may be interested
in starting a business. More importantly,
staff from the Mayor’s Office for Economic
Development may be the key staff for
overseeing and coordinating implementation
measures related to economic development.
■ U.S. Small Business Administration. The
US Small Business Administration (SBA)
is an independent agency of the federal
government. Its mission is to aid, counsel,
assist and protect the interests of small
business concerns, to preserve free
competitive enterprise and to maintain and
strengthen the overall national economy. The
SBA is most well-known for assisting with small
8-14 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
business loans, but it also provides federal
contract procurement assistance, management
assistance, and specialized outreach to women,
minorities and armed forces veterans. SBA also
provides loans to victims of natural disasters
and specialized advice and assistance in
international trade.
Under its most common program, the SBA
Advantage 7(a) loans, the SBA does not provide
a loan to an eligible business. Rather, the SBA
guarantees repayment of the loan, which is
provided by a participating local bank. The
SBA guarantee reduces the risk to the lender.
The applications can be downloaded from the
SBA website, but the applicant submits the
application directly to the local bank, not the
SBA.The SBA’s district office is at 801 R Street
in downtown Fresno. Loan applications forms
and a wide variety of business assistance and
training resources are available on the SBA
website, https://www.sba.gov/.
■ Fresno Community Development Financial
Institution. The Fresno Community
Development Financial Institution (FCDFI) is a
small business loan fund that assists with the
growth of businesses and jobs in underserved
communities. FCDFI provides small business
and micro loans from $10,000 to $300,000 for
expanding existing businesses or starting a new
business.
■ The FCDFI office is at 1920 Mariposa Mall
in downtown Fresno. More information and
loan applications are available on its website,
https://fresnocdfi.com/.
■ Service Core of Retired Executives. Central
Valley Service Core of Retired Executives
(SCORE) fosters vibrant small business
communities through mentoring and
education. SCORE is a nonprofit association
dedicated to helping small businesses get
off the ground, grow and achieve their goals
through education and mentorship. Supported
by the SBA, and a network of volunteers,
SCORE provides services at no charge or at very
low cost. These services include:
§ Volunteer mentors who share their expertise
across 62 industries
§ Free, confidential business mentoring in
person or via email
§ Free business tools, templates and tips here
online
§ Inexpensive or free business workshops
(locally) and webinars (online 24/7)
SCORE’s local office is at 801 R Street in
downtown Fresno. More information
is available on its website at https://
centralvalley.score.org/.
■ Fresno Chamber of Commerce. With a
membership of more than 1,400 businesses
and organizations, the Fresno Chamber of
Commerce is the leading voice and advocate
for the business community. The Chamber
promotes economic opportunity, business
education and successful business relationships
throughout the region.
■ In addition to networking opportunities, the
Chamber helps its members stay informed
about business practices and changes in
legislation. The Chamber also provides
information about a variety of business-related
topics from employer legal requirements to
marketing strategies through its monthly Small
Business University program.
■ The Fresno Chamber of Commerce is at 2331
Fresno Street in downtown Fresno. More
information is available on the Chamber’s
website, http://www.fresnochamber.com/.
■ Fresno Metro Black Chamber of Commerce.
The Fresno Metro Black Chamber of Commerce
(FMBCC) facilitates and serves as an advocate
for the creation, development, growth, and
general welfare of the African American
business community in the greater Fresno area.
The FMBCC pursues its mission by:
§ Advocating on behalf of members and the
general Black business community
§ Informing membership of problems affecting
businesses in the greater Fresno community
§ Increasing public awareness of the black
business community and the impact of the
Fresno’s black buying power
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-15
§ Promoting black-owned businesses within
the Black and mainstream community
§ Increasing the capacity of current and
potential members through education and
training services
The FMBCC is located at 1444 Fulton Street
in downtown Fresno. More information is
available on the FMBCC website, http://www.
fmbcc.com/.
Implementation of Business Development
and Business Startup Assistance
The key to effectively providing business development and business startup assistance in the Plan Area is connecting existing businesses and
residents interested in starting a business with the
service providers described above. In most cases,
the services are free or at a nominal cost because
the State and federal government invest in the
service providers. Thus, the critical role is coordination.
Although there are a variety of ways to provide
coordination, the coordination of business development and business startup assistance should be accomplished through a collaboration of staff from
the District 3 Councilmember’s Office and staff
from the Mayor’s Office of Economic Development.
The three components to this effort are:
■ Business Survey. The first step is to survey
existing businesses in the Plan Area to find out
what they perceive to be the challenges and
opportunities for operating a business in the
area and what they believe to be their needs
for business assistance. The survey should be
conducted in the first year after adoption of
the Plan and then repeated once every two or
three years.
■ The survey need not be elaborate, and there
are many samples of such surveys available
online. Although the survey can be conducted
online, a better response rate would likely be
achieved by in-person surveys. City staff should
design the survey, but it could be administered
by community volunteers.
■ Business Assistance Workshop. Based on the
results of the survey, a business assistance
workshop can be conducted in the Plan
Area. This workshop would allow the service
providers described in the preceding section
to meet with existing businesses and residents
interested in starting a business and to talk
about the types of services and programs they
offer. The service providers would also have
an opportunity to hear from businesses about
their needs. This workshop could be repeated
on an annual basis.
■ Provide Business Assistance. Many of the
business development and business startup
assistance services are provided in an online
or one-on-one format. However, many other
services are provided in a group, classroom, or
workshop format. For these services, the City
should seek to facilitate the provision of these
services at a location in the Plan Area. These
programs would be provided on a periodic
basis throughout the year.
LABOR FORCE EDUCATION AND
TRAINING
Whereas the business development in Business
Startup and Business Development Assistance
section focuses on businesses in the Plan Area, this
Labor Force Education and Training section focuses
on the human capital of individuals living in the
Plan Area. Improving the skills and education of
resident who would like to be employed or would
like to improve their earning potential can increase
income, household wealth, and consumer spending
in the Plan Area. The key service providers for labor
force education and training include:
■ Fresno Regional Workforce Development
Board. The FRWDB provides services to
individuals through two programs:
§ Adult and Dislocated Worker Services.
Under the leadership of the Fresno Regional
Workforce Development Board (Workforce
Connection), adults and dislocated workers
can access employment, education,
and training services through a unique
combination of six Workforce Connection
8-16 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
One-Stop Centers. The center nearest the
Plan Area is located at 1900 Mariposa Mall
in Downtown Fresno. The One-Stop System
provides universal core services (such as
universal access to informational, selfdirected core services, individual assessment, job search, and employment assistance)
as well as access to other programs and
services available from partner agencies,
including the Employment Development
Department, Department of Rehabilitation,
California Indian Manpower Consortium,
Proteus, Inc., Fresno County Economic
Opportunities Commission, Department
of Employment and Temporary Assistance,
State Center Community College District,
Fresno Adult School, Clovis Adult School,
West Hills Community College, and Fresno
Housing Authority. More information is
available at the FRWDB website at http://
www.workforce-connection.com/jobseekers/
index.cfm?pg=adult_services/.
§ Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
(WIOA) Year-Round Youth Services. Under
the direction and oversight of the Fresno
Regional Workforce Development Board
Youth Council, Fresno County eligible youth,
ages 14 through 21, can access services
designed to increase educational options
and opportunities, develop job skills, explore
career options, develop leadership qualities,
participate in adult and peer mentoring and
counseling, and take advantage of work
experiences. The location near the Plan Area
where these services are available is the
Fresno Economic Opportunities Commission
at 1920 Mariposa Mall in Downtown
Fresno. More information is available at the
FRWDB website at http://www.workforceconnection.com/youthServices/index. cfm?pg=ythindex/.
■ Fresno Unified School District, Fresno Adult
School. Fresno Adult School offers a variety
of courses and programs for adult learners.
To meet the diverse learning needs of adults,
courses are offered in the morning, afternoon,
evenings, and weekends. The adult school
offers the following programs:
§ Adult basic education
§ English as a second language
§ Career and technical education
§ High school equivalency prep
§ High school diploma
§ Community education
The nearest location at which these programs
are provided is at the main campus at 2500
Stanislaus Street in Downtown Fresno. More
information is available at the website, http://
www.fas.edu/.
■ Central Unified School District, Central
Learning Adult School Site. The Central
Learning Adult School Site offers a variety of
courses and programs for adult learners. The
programs are provided in the morning and
evening at 2698 N. Brawley Avenue in Fresno.
The programs offered include:
§ Adult basic education
§ English as a second language
§ Career and technical education
§ GED and HiSET prep
§ Adult High school diploma
More information is available at the website,
http://central-learning-adult-school-site.
echalksites.com/home_page/.
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-17
■ State Center Community College District,
Fresno City College. Fresno City College
(FCC) is a comprehensive learning community
offering innovative instructional programs in
anticipation of and responsive to the lifelong
learning needs of our diverse population. FCC
offers Associate’s Degrees, and students can
earn a Certificate of Completion, or transfer to
a 4-year university of their choice. In addition,
FCC offers a variety of non-degree programs,
including:
§ Arts, audio visual technology and
communication
§ Business, finance and computer information
technology
§ Education and training
§ Food service
§ Health care
§ Human services
§ Manufacturing, construction, and technology
§ Public safety, corrections and security
§ Science and technology
§ Transportation
§ Customized training
Implementation of Labor Force Education
and Training
It is likely that many residents in Southwest
Fresno are unaware of the employment services,
education, and training programs and assistance
available to them. Community organizations and
the City can play a vital economic development
role by acquainting residents with these services.
Staff from the District 3 Councilmember’s Office
could collaborate with staff from the Mayor’s Office
of Economic Development to conduct an annual
workshop. The workshop would provide an opportunity for the service providers described above to introduce the range of programs and services
that Plan Area residents can access. This workshop
should be an annual event, and it could be held in
conjunction with another community event, such
as a health and wellness fair.
E. IMPLEMENTATION
ACTION PLAN
Tables 8-2 through 8-6 set forth the implementation action plan for the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan. The actions are organized into five categories:
■ Community Resources
■ Economic Development
■ Infrastructure
■ Mobility
■ Parks
Under each topic there are a set of actions. The
first column provides a unique identification
number for each action. When a number ends with
a letter (e.g., M-2A, M-2B, and M2-C) it indicates
that those actions are related, and the first action
needs to be completed before the second action
commences. In the funding column, “General fund,
redirection of existing resources” indicates that
the action would likely be completed with existing
budgeted resources and with in-house staff. In
contrast, “General fund, $10,000” indicates that
the action would either require additional funding
or that it is an action that the City would likely be
contracted out.
The implementation action plan identifies four
actions as priorities. These relatively focused
measures are intended to be implemented or at
least started around the time the Plan is adopted to
demonstrate to the community the City’s commitment to the Plan. These actions are highlighted as “easy short-term wins” for the Southwest Fresno
community. The priority actions, identified with a
“P” are:
■ CR-P1: Implementation Oversight Committee
■ ED-P1: Employment Skills and Training
Workshop
■ M-P1: Sidewalk Demonstration Project
■ P-P1: New Park Priority Project
The implementation action plan is a framework.
It is fully anticipated that, over time, the City will
make adjustments to this plan.
8-18 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
TABLE 8-2 Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Community Resources TABLE 8-3 Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Economic Development SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Plan-wide CR-P1 Implementation
Oversight
Committee
Establish a
committee of Plan
Area residents,
businesses, and
civic organizations
to oversee
implementation of
the Plan.
Councilmember’s
Office
FY2018 and
annually
thereafter
General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
PF-5.1
CR-2 Adequate School
Facilities
Conduct an
annual meeting
with Fresno Unified,
Central Unified, and
Washington Unified
School Districts and
review development
activity and projects
in the entitlement
process to ensure
the provision of
adequate school
facilities
Planning and
Development
FY2019 and
annually
thereafter
General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
PF-4.1
CR-3 Adequate Health
Care Services
Conduct an annual
meeting with the
Fresno County Public
Health Department
and hospitals to
review the need for
health clinics and
medical facilities to
serve residents of the
Plan Area
Planning and
Development
FY2019 and
annual
thereafter
General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
PF-6.1
ED-P1 Employment
Skills and Training
Workshop
In collaboration
with education
and job training
partners, conduct
an employment
skills and training
workshop to
acquaint Plan Area
residents with the
opportunities for
lifelong learning and
jobs skills training
Councilmember’s
Office; Economic
Development
FY2018 and
biennially
thereafter
General fund,
$10,000
N/A ED-2A Business Survey Conduct a survey of
existing businesses
and use the results
to prepare a SWOT
analysis and identify
assistance needs
Councilmember’s
Office; Economic
Development
FY2018 and
biennially
thereafter
Redirection
of existing
resources
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-19
TABLE 8-3 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Economic Development SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
N/A ED-2B Business Assistance
Workshop
In collaboration
with economic
development service
providers, conduct a
business assistance
workshop for
existing businesses
and entrepreneurs
interested in starting
a business
Councilmember’s
Office; Economic
Development
FY2018 and
biennially
thereafter
General fund,
$10,000
Policy
LU-4.1
ED-3 Home Ownership
Workshop
In collaboration with
banks and housing
organizations,
conduct a workshop
to acquaint Plan
Area residents with
programs and
services to assist firsttime home buyers
and to assist existing
homeowners facing
financial hardship
Councilmember’s
Office; Housing
and Community
Development
FY2018 and
biennially
thereafter
General fund,
$10,000
Goal LU-1 ED-4 Development
Potential
Marketing
Develop marketing
collateral and
conduct a workshop
to acquaint
developers, real
estate brokers,
and potential
new businesses
with development
opportunities in the
Plan Area
Economic
Development
FY2019 and
annually
thereafter
Redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
PF-6.4
ED-5 Youth
Development
In collaboration
with education
and community
organization
partners, develop
programs that help
nurture leadership,
skills, and ambition in
Plan Area youth
Councilmember’s
Office
FY2019 and
annually
thereafter
General fund,
$10,000
Policy
PF-6.3
ED-6 Community
College Campus
Advocate for State
Center Community
College District to
fund and develop a
community college
campus within the
Plan’s southern
magnet core/MLK
Activity Center
Mayor’s Office /
City Manager
FY2020 and
annually
thereafter
until complete
Redirection
of existing
resources
8-20 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
TABLE 8-4 Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Infrastructure Policy
U-1.4
I-1A Water and Sewer
Master Plan
Update the water
and sewer master
plan to incorporate
improvements
identified in the Plan
Public Utilities FY2018 General fund,
TBD
Policy
U-1.3
I-1B Impact Fees Update
development
impact fees as
necessary to
facilitate the
water and sewer
improvements
identified in the Plan
Public Utilities;
Finance
FY2018 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
U-1.4
I-1C Construct Water
and Sewer
Improvements
Construct water and
sewer improvements
as needed pursuant
to existing City
standards
Public Utilities 2 to 15 years DIF, $163M
Policies
T-12.2 and
U-1.3
I-2B Construct
storm drain
improvements
Developers to
construct necessary
storm drain
improvements,
coordinated with the
Fresno Metropolitan
Flood Control District
Developers 1 to 15 years Developer
funded,
$1,211,000
Policy
T-12.1
I-3 Low-Impact
Development
Coordinate with the
Fresno Metropolitan
Flood Control District
to consider potential
development
code amendments
for Low-Impact
Development
(LID) storm water
management
techniques with
curb, gutter,
and sidewalk
improvements
Planning and
Development in
coordination with
FMFCD
FY2018 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-21
TABLE 8-5 Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Mobility
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Policy
T-1.2
M-P1 Sidewalk
Demonstration
Project
Construct sidewalks
along streets
identified in the
high priority area of
the Fresno ATP as a
priority project
Public Works FY2018 General fund,
TBD
Policy
T-8.3
M-2A Street Funding Plan Establish a
development
impact fee for road
improvements
Public Works;
Mayor/City
Manager, Finance
FY2018 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
T-8.3
M-2B Existing Street
Improvements
Program currently
needed street
improvements
into the capital
improvement plan
and construct the
improvements as
funding becomes
available
Public Works;
Finance
Include in the
budget for
FY2019
Capital
improvement
program
Policy
T-10.1
M-2C Construct
New Street
Improvements
Construct complete
streets improvements
as needed for new
development
Public Works;
Developers
1 to 15 years DIF and
Developer
funded
Policy
T-10.1
M-3 Contractual
Assessment District
Establish a
contractual
assessment district
to fund complete
street improvements
in existing
developed areas
to complement
sidewalk and
streetscape
improvements
installed by adjacent
and nearby new
development
Public Works;
Finance
FY2019 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Goals
T-12 and
T-13
M-4 Landscape
and Lighting
Maintenance
District
Engage Plan Area
property owners
in establishing
a lighting and
landscape
maintenance district
to fund ongoing
maintenance of
complete street
and other public
realm improvements
throughout the Plan
Area
Councilmember’s
Office; Public
Works; Finance
FY2019 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
8-22 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
TABLE 8-5 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Mobility Goal T-10 M-5A Complete Streets
Funding
In planned areas
with existing
development,
engage property
owners to establish
an assessment
district to construct
complete street
improvements inlieu of a voluntary
contractual
assessment district
Councilmember’s
Office; Public
Works; Finance
FY2020 General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Goal T-10 M-5B Construct
Complete Street
Improvements
Construct complete
street improvements
Public Works In conjunction
with new
development,
upon
voluntary
participation
by property
owners
through a
contractual
assessment
district
or upon
establishment
of an
assessment
district
Developer;
Assessment
district
Policy
T-4.1
M-6 Bicycle and Trail
Network
Program bicycle and
trail facilities from the
Fresno ATP into the
capital improvement
plan and construct
the facilities as
funding is available
Public Works;
Finance
10 years
for priority
network (see
Fresno ATP for
specifics)
Refer to Fresno
ATP
Policy
T-6.2
M-7 Public Transit Conduct an annual
meeting with FAX to
review development
activity and projects
in the entitlement
process in order to
ensure FAX transit
routes adequately
connect existing
and future
residential areas to
key destinations,
including schools,
retail, employment,
and recreation
and to ensure the
establishment of bus
rapid transit routes
along Elm Avenue
and California
Avenue
Planning and
Development
2018 Redirection
of existing
resources;
would not
require
additional
funding
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-23
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Policy
T-9.1
M-8A Establish Truck
Routes
Adopt an ordinance
establishing the truck
routes shown on the
Existing, Planned
and Recommended
Truck Routes Map
Mayor / City
Manager; Public
Works
2018 Does not
require
additional
funding
Policy
T-9.1
M-8B Truck Route
Improvements
Program needed
truck route
improvements
into the capital
improvement plan
and construct the
improvements as
funding is available
City and County
Public Works
Include in the
budget for
FY2019
Capital
improvement
program
Policy
T-3.5
M-9A Safe Routes to
School Plan
Develop safe routes
to school plans for
schools serving the
Plan Area.
Planning and
Development;
Public Works
FY2019 General fund,
$45,000
Policy
T-3.5
M-9B Safe Routes
to School
Improvements
Program safe
routes to school
improvements
into the capital
improvement
plan, apply for
grant funding,
and construct
improvements as
funding is available
Public Works;
Planning and
Development
Include in the
budget for
FY2020
Grants;
Capital
improvement
program
TABLE 8-5 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Mobility 8-24 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
Goal PF-2 P-P1 New Park Priority
Project
Construct new park
at Grove Street,
west of Elm Avenue
as a priority project
to serve existing
neighborhoods on
either side
PARCS FY2018 General fund,
Approximately
$150,000 (City
staff will need
to identify
specific
improvements
and extimate
the cost)
Policy
PF-1.3
P-2A Parks
Environmental
Cleanup Plan
Develop a plan to
remediate toxic sites
on and/or adjacent
to existing parkland
PARCS; Public
Works
1 to 2 years General fund,
$55,000
Policy
PF-1.3
P-2B Parks
Environmental
Cleanup
Remediate toxic sites
on and/or adjacent
to existing parkland.
PARCS; Public
Works
2 to 5 years TBD
Policy
PF-1.2
P-3 Park Safety Address delinquent
activity and vagrant
populations on
parkland through
a ranger program,
increased
enforcement, or
additional PARCS
programming
PARCS; Police
Department
FY2018 and
ongoing
Redirection
of existing
resources
TABLE 8-6 Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Parks
SP
GOAL/
POLICY
MEASURE
NUMBER
MEASURE
NAME DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY;
SUPPORT PARTIES
TIME
FRAME FUNDING
Chapter 8 | Implementation 8-25
TABLE 8-6 (CONTINUED) Implementation Action Plan Matrix: Parks Goal PF-1 P-4A Parks Improvement
Plan
Develop a parks
improvement plan
for existing parks
PARCS FY2018 in
coordination
with Fresno
Parks Master
Plan
General fund,
redirection
of existing
resources
Policy
PF-1.1
P-4B Improve Existing
Parks
Upgrade existing
parks’ infrastructure,
landscaping,
seating, and
amenities
PARCS; Public
Works
10 years in
coordination
with the
Fresno Parks
Master Plan
TBD
Goal PF-2 P-5 New Park Master
Plans
Develop a
conceptual
master plan for
neighborhood parks
in each geographic
quarter-section
with the first new
development
proposed
Planning and
Development;
PARCS
Concurrent
with future
development
proposals and
Fresno Parks
Master Plan
Developers
Policy
PF-2.1
P-6 Develop New
Parks
Develop and
maintain
neighborhood and
community parks
PARCS; Public
Works
Subsequent
to future
development
proposals
Development:
DIFs
Maintenance:
General Fund
8-26 Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
this page intentionally left blank
MEMORANDUM
DATE August 8, 2017
TO Sophia Pagoulatos
City of Fresno, Development and Resource Management Department FROM Bruce Brubaker, PlaceWorks
SUBJECT Revisions to the Public Review Draft Southwest Fresno Specific Plan This memo describes recommended changes to the Public Review Draft of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (Draft Plan), released May 2017. These changes are based on two criteria:
1. Discussions from the Steering Committee (Committee) at Committee meetings held on June 26 and July 6, 2017. The purpose of the Committee meetings was to review public comments received on the Draft Plan and recommend revisions to the Plan to address these comments.
2. Revisions recommended by the technical consultant team based on the recent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis for the Draft Plan.
The proposed revisions are shown below, with the associated public comment that led to the revision.
Text from the Draft Plan is shown in italics with deleted text in strikethrough and new text in doubleunderline.
Other public comments not addressed in this memo will be addressed through responses in a separate comment matrix and/or redline version of the Draft Plan to be released before the Draft Plan is presented to the Planning Commission and City Council, anticipated to be in October 2017.
Revisions as Discussed with the Steering Committee
CHAPTERS 1 TO 3: PLAN INTRODUCTION, VISION, AND LAND USE Public Comment: Guiding Principles on Industrial Compatibility (page 2-4).
To improve the compatibility of industrial uses near residential land uses, change the Guiding Principle (second bullet) to read:
Restrict the proximity ofProhibit new industrial development in the Specific Plan Area consistent with the proposed Specific Plan land use and zoning provisions and restrict the proximity of truck routes near residential areas to the maximum extent feasible.
August 8, 2017 | Page 2
Public Comment: Guiding Principles on Industrial Compatibility (page 2-4).
Public Comment: Remove truck route on Church Avenue which passes through homes and three schools (map on page 5-11).
To strengthen the outcomes from the upcoming Industrial Land Use Compatibility Study, revise the following language to Policy LU-8.5 on page 3-15:
Policy LU-8.5: Assess the compatibility of Industrial and heavy commercial land uses with existing neighborhoods through the completion of the Industrial Land Use Compatibility Study. The study should identify and adopt long-term solutions to address the findings from the assessment.
Options should include greening strategies, relocation, and amortization. As a part of the planning process for the study, the City should work with the County, community, and stakeholders, such as business owners, to relocate truck routes away from neighborhoods to the extent possible. The study is to be completed by December 8, 2017.
Public Comment: Land Use Map (page 3-4).
The Specific Plan land use map proposes Community Commercial and Urban Neighborhood land uses on parcels on the south side of Whites Bridge Avenue between Marks and Hughes Avenues (see a focused image below of Figure 3-2, the Draft Plan’s Land Use Map). It may not be feasible to develop that level of retail if there is not yet a market demand for that retail. To address this, the Plan will add to these parcels a dual use land use designation (or similar mechanism) to allow Medium Low Density Single Family on those parcels subject to certain restrictions on timing and public hearing requirements, to be determined by City staff prior to adoption of the Specific Plan.
Revise Figure 3-3 accordingly (see page 3).
41 41
180
99 99
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
DANRONQUILLO DR
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
FIG AVENUE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD
HUGHES AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
FIGURE 3-3 Dual Land Use Designation Map for Plan Area
RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE EMPLOYMENT
CMX Corridor/Center Mixed-Use O Office
Medium Density (5 - 12 du/ac)
Medium High Density (12 - 16 du/ac)
Urban Neighborhood (16 - 30 du/ac)
Medium Low Density (3.5 - 6 du/ac)
City Limit Sphere of Influence
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
O
CMX CMX
O
O
O
August 8, 2017 | Page 4
Public Comment: The Implementation Chapter should include more detail in implementation priorities and cost estimates.
At their July 6, 2017 meeting, the Committee created implementation priorities to be added to the Draft Plan. One of the priorities was to “Include an anti-displacement policy.” This policy has been added under Goal LU-4 as Policy LU-4.8 on page 3-13:
Policy LU-4.8: Establish an anti-displacement strategy and an anti-displacement and relocation program to minimize and avoid the displacement of existing residents outside of the Plan Area caused by new development.
CHAPTERS 4 AND 5: DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND TRANSPORTATION Public Comment: Existing and Potential Transit Routes (map on page 5-7).
Strengthen the commitment to prevent reduction of transit routes west of Highway 99 and to better serve the disadvantaged neighborhoods in Southwest Fresno. Reinforce this commitment by supporting the new routes shown on the Figure 5-6 of the Draft Plan, and revise Policy T-7.1 on page 5-25 as follows:
Policy T-7.1: ConsiderWork with FAX to not reduce transit routes west of Highway 99, and work to enhanced transit service along Elm Avenue and Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard to connect to future BRT routes and the FAX and HSR stations in Downtown when there is demand from development along the Mixed Use and Jobs those corridors. Public Comment: Promote and incentivize zero emission buses.
Add a new policy under Goal T-7 on page 5-25:
Policy T-7.3: Promote and incentivize zero emission buses in the Plan Area. Public Comment: Ensure transit is accessible to residents in the neighborhoods (map on page 5-7).
The Plan must ensure that focusing transit on corridors with intensive land uses does not result in failure to provide efficient services to neighborhoods that are not along corridors and looks at alternative first and last mile solutions to allow all residents to benefit from these services. Add a new policy under Goal T-7 on page 5-25:
Policy T-7.4: In order to provide service to the maximum number of riders possible, consider first and last mile solutions, which may include smaller connecting busses or complete street measures such as wider sidewalks, safer street crossings, and bicycle facilities.
August 8, 2017 | Page 5
Public Comment: Remove truck route on Church Avenue passing by homes and three schools (map on page 5-11).
After deliberation by the Committee about truck routes on Church Avenue and throughout the Plan Area, direction was given to consider removal of the existing truck route on Church Avenue between Fruit and Elm Avenues (leaving a truck route on Church Avenue from West to Fruit Avenues). Revise Figure 5-6 on page 5-11 of the Plan accordingly (see page 6). In addition, revise the third bullet point on page 5-12 of the Draft Plan as follows:
The truck routes along Jensen Avenue between Knight and Elm Avenues and along Church Avenue between Fruit and Elm Avenues should be eliminated to avoid passing through multiple residential neighborhoods and schools. The pParallel truck routes along Church and Central Avenues should be used as an alternative. Jensen and Church Avenues east of Elm Avenue should remain a truck routes so that trucks can access Highway 41 and the industrial areas in the “reverse triangle” between Highways 41 and 99. Jensen Avenue west of Knight Avenue should remain a truck route to service existing industrial and future office uses south of Jensen Avenue. Public Comment: Will 6-lane roads be necessary on Hughes at Whites Bridge? (map on page 5-9).
The committee discussed limiting roads to four lanes in the Plan Area. After deliberation, the Committee decided to let the Plan’s EIR traffic analysis, which was underway at the time, make recommendations for the required number of lanes on roads. The Committee did not take action on this comment. See section “Revisions from CEQA Analysis” of this memo on page 18 for proposed roadway changes to streets within the Plan Area based on the EIR traffic analysis. Public Comment: Questions the Plan’s recommendation for enhanced sidewalk design and street tree and street lighting spacing requirements (pages 5-14 through 5-18).
The Draft Plan discusses recommendations for sidewalk widths, street tree spacing, and streetlight spacing. The committee took no action. Staff reviewed and decided to revise these sections to match City standards and definitions. Relevant text in the Plan has been revised accordingly and for clarity on pages 5-14 (along with Figure 5-7), 5-17, and 5-18 as follows:
Sidewalks
Wherever possible, existing sidewalks should be widened through a public easement for pedestrian purposes on the adjacent private property to accommodate a throughway zone for pedestrian traffic along with a curb zone and a building frontage zone, as illustrated in Figure 5-7. This should be accommodated as vacant parcels are developed and existing buildings are redeveloped; buildings should be set back from the back of walk to accommodate the following zones and widths. New sidewalks should also be provided in these areas with widths that are consistent with City standardsthree zones and be no less than 12 feet in width.
Truck Routes
ounty Permit Route
isting Truck Route
UTURE PLANNED TRUCK ROUTE
isting Industrial Land Use
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
HUGHES AVE
HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-6 Existing, Planned, and Recommended Truck Routes Existing Truck Route
Existing Residential Land Use
in Plan Area
Existing Industrial Land Uses Served
by Truck Routes in Southwest Fresno
Recommended Elimination of
Existing Truck Route
Recommended New Truck Route
CARGILL
MEAT SOLUTIONS
BUSSETO
FOODS
FOSTER
POULTRY
FARMS
FRESNO
CHANDLER
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
Source: City of Fresno
August 8, 2017 | Page 7
• Throughways Zone. Maintain 5- to 6-foot minimum pedestrian-through zones throughways that are completely clear of obstructions (e.g., tree grates, planters, light poles, etc.) and meet all applicable Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations. Relocate utility boxes out of the pedestrian-through throughwayszone, where feasible. For new sidewalks adjacent to residentialonly projects, provide a 7-foot wider throughway zone adjacent to the private parcel. • Curbs Zone. Place street furniture, including light poles, benches, and trash receptacles, in the outer 2-foot minimum zone area adjacent to the curb. Landscape strips are also appropriate in this zone areaand should be at least 5 feet wide, and 6 to 8 feet wide where landscaped with larger trees. Widths of landscape strips should be consistent with City standards. • Building Frontages Zone. In areas with mixed-use development, improve facades of adjacent commercial buildings with awnings and other pedestrian-scale enhancements. New commercial development should be built close to the property line, with setbacks for wider throughways zones and building frontages zones. Building fFrontages zones can accommodate sidewalk cafés, store entrances, retail displays, and/or landscaping. They are not needed on low-density, residential streets. Acquire public access easements on private property to expand sidewalks and useable pedestrian areas and/or add street trees and landscaping for common open space.
Figure 5-7 Building Frontage, Throughway, and Curb Areas Zones on a Sidewalk Streetscape Amenities
• Lighting. Energy-efficient street light poles and pedestrian lights (e.g., solar, LED) should be consistently spaced according to City standardsevery 20 to 30 feet to provide sufficient lighting August 8, 2017 | Page 8
for pedestrians on the sidewalk and bicyclists in the street; they should alternate with street trees.
o Where the sidewalk is adjacent to the street, pedestrian lights should be attached to the street light poles.
o Where the sidewalk is separated from the street, pedestrian lights should be installed as separate units and consistently spaced according to City standardsevery 20 to 30 feet.
Green Infrastructure
• Landscaping and Street Trees. Plant street trees to provide shade for pedestrians on sidewalks, reduce the heat island effect, and beautify the street. Space trees at an interval distance consistent with City standards 20 to 30 feet apart in between street lights. If trees are planted in bulb-outs or a parking lane, they should be spaced to allow for parking stalls in between.
Install tree grates that are flush with the sidewalk to protect the trees’ roots and are not tripping hazards.
Public Comment: What are the definitions of terms like biofiltration, trench, and sharrow? (pages 5- 19 and 5-21)
Regarding these terms, biofiltration trench (or bioswale) is a place for stormwater to collect and soak into the ground during rainstorms. Sharrows are roads shared between bicycles and vehicles (marked by arrows that communicate the shared lane, i.e., a share-the-lane-arrow).
In order to clarify terms that are not commonly understood, the Draft Plan will have an added section with definitions of terms. The new definitions section will be included in the Final Draft of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan (Final Plan).
Public Comment: On page 5-23, “new wide sidewalks” in Policy T-1.4 needs to be defined.
Revise Policy T-1.4 to indicate that widths of new sidewalks will be determined by the Citywide Development Code.
Policy T-1.4: Encourage the provision of new wide sidewalks in new development areas or widen existing sidewalks where ROW is available to provide an adequate and clear path of travel for accessibility, consistent with the California Building Code and ADA. The width of new or widened sidewalks will be determined according to the City of Fresno’s Citywide Development Code.
CHAPTERS 6 AND 7: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES
Public Comment: Concern that the chapter and parks acreage comparison in Table 6-1 reflects the acreage counts in the General Plan of 3.45 acres per 1,000 residents; still counts Hyde Park, and still includes ponding basin parks (page 6-1 – 6-8).
August 8, 2017 | Page 9
Revise this section to show the acreage and parkland ratio does not meet the City’s parkland standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents. Park acreage accounting should not include Hyde Park, the Regional Sports Complex, and portions of ponding basin parks that are inaccessible yearround. This account also should not include Hinton, Bigby Villa, and Pride Parks – although they are within walking distance of the Plan Area, they are outside of the Plan Area boundary and should not be a part of the acreage count for the Plan. In addition, update the amenities listed at existing parks. Revise the Draft Plan language as follows:
Existing Parkland Inventory
Table 6-1 provides information on the existing parks and open space within walking distance of Southwest Fresno residents, which includes all parkland less than 40 acres in size owned and/or maintained by the City of Fresno, San Joaquin River Parkway, and Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District’s (FMFCD) ponding basin parks within or just outside the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan Area (Plan Area). Parkland over 40 acres in size is considered a regional park, such as the Regional Sports Complex, and therefore not included in this table. In the case of FMFCD, only the portions of ponding basin parks that are usable year round are counted in this table – see discussion below. Policy POSS-1-a on page 5-20 of the General Plan states that the City’s parkland standard is three acres per 1,000 residents for Pocket, Neighborhood, and Community parks, with an aspirational goal of five acres per 1,000 residents for all parks throughout the city, if additional funding for regional parks and trails is identified. Using the City’s methodology of counting open space as parkland, Table 6-1 shows that the existing parks listed meets and even exceeds the General Plan’s parkland standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents at a ratio of 3.45 acres per 1,000 residents. The parkland-to-resident ratio calculation uses a Southwest Fresno population of 12,649 people. Note that the table does not include Southwest Fresno’s Regional Sports Complex since it is a regional park and more than 40 acres in size.
There has been extensive discussion from the community about what types of open space meet the community’s criteria for usable parkland, which are reflected in Table 6-1. The community has expressed that there are certain types of open space designated by the General Plan that fall short from the community’s parkland criteria and should not be considered usable parkland, described below:
• Ponding Basins and Ponding Basin Parks. Some of Fresno’s ponding basins are used seasonally as parkland. The Plan Area’s ponding basins (Basin FF and Basin TT2) are retention basins, which are designed to retain and infiltrate water. The community, however, does not consider ponding basins/ponding basin parks as adequate parkland because they have limited amenities and access. The west section of Basin FF (west of West Avenue) is for recharge only and has no public access. The east section of Basin FF has a tot lot at the southeast corner, which is open to the general public year-round, but access to the rest of the basin is used as a driving range and limited to the Fresno-Greater San Joaquin Valley Junior Golf Foundation. Basin TT2’s “upper level” play area is generally closed during the winter depending on the conditions affected by the winter season’s rain.
August 8, 2017 | Page 10
• Hyde Park. The community expressed that open space located on or close to a landfill or toxic site, such as Hyde Park, should not be counted as parkland due to concerns for the community’s environmental health and the limited uses allowed on the land. • The Regional Sports Complex. The community thinks that the Regional Sports Complex is inadequate parkland because it is not within walking distance of most existing Southwest Fresno residential neighborhoods and requires an entry fee.
When following the community’s parkland criteria and excluding the types of unusable parkland previously described such as ponding basin park areas with limited access and Hyde Park, Table 6-1 reflects the community’s parkland criteria and does not include Hyde Park nor the full acreage for ponding basin parks, which includes portions of the ponding basin park that are used for retention, not publicly accessible, or not open year-round. The General Plan states that the City’s parkland standard is three acres per 1,000 residents for Pocket, Neighborhood, and Community parks, and two acres per 1,000 residents for Regional Parks, trails, and greenways.
Table 6-1 shows that existing parkland in Southwest Fresno equals a total of 22.0918.91 acres, which yields a parkland-to-resident ratio of 1.741.49 acres per 1,000 residents. 1.741.49 acres per 1,000 residents is well below the General Plan’s three 3 acres per 1,000 residents standard.
The Plan recommends providing new parkland to increase total acreage. The Plan also recommends as well as the following mitigations regarding that would improve the conditions of inadequate existing parks so that the existing parkland in Southwest Fresno better fits the community’s parkland criteria:
• Increase access and improve amenities at ponding basin parks. To improve the usability of ponding basin parks, the Plan recommends increasing amenities and access so that these parks can function better as parkland in order to serve nearby residents. Furthermore, parkland acreage for ponding basin parks should be limited to the upper and/or middle levels of the park that are usable as parkland; this method of counting acreage will improve the accuracy of the parkland-to-resident ratio. These acreage totals are already reflected in Table 6-1. • Re-designate Hyde Park’s land use from Community Park to general Open Space. Because Hyde Park is located on a landfill, park amenities and development on the land are limited. Redesignating Hyde Park as a different type of land use will improve the accuracy of the parklandto-resident ratio in Southwest Fresno. • Increase accessibility to the Regional Sports Complex. Currently, the Regional Sports Complex is located away from existing residential neighborhoods and has limited walkable or bikeable access. As described in Chapter 5, Transportation, the Plan proposes to connect all Southwest Fresno neighborhoods to the Regional Sports Complex via new bikeways and multi-use trails.
The Plan’s overall land use vision also locates new residential neighborhoods in the Sphere of Influence (SOI) within walkable distance of the Regional Sports Complex.
August 8, 2017 | Page 11
TABLE 6-1 Existing Parkland Inventory Counted Toward the General Plan’s 3 Acres per 1,000 Residents Standard
Park
Name
Existing
Acreage Notes Existing Amenities
Chandler* 2.00
Mini park surrounded on all
sides by housing; located
west of Chandler Airport
Barbecues, Basketball Courts,
Children’s Play StructuresArea, Picnic
Tables, Drinking Fountain
CFD11_TR554
9_04*
0.35 Surrounded on all sides by
housing; unnamed
Benches, Walking Course
Habitat* 1.30 Surrounded on all sides by
housing
None
Sunset* 0.98
Located next to the Sunset
Neighborhood Center and
Sunset Elementary School
Barbecues, Children’s Play
StructuresArea, Community Center,
Computer Lab, Kitchen, Picnic
Tables, Restrooms, Social Hall,
Wading Pool, Parking Lot
Mary Ella
Brown*
4.25 Located next to the Mary
Ella Brown Community
Center
Baseball/Softball Fields, Children’s
Play StructuresArea, Community
Center, Computer Lab,
Football/Soccer Field, Kitchen,
Parking Lot, Restrooms, Social Hall,
Swimming Pool, Wading Pool,
Community Garden, Basketball
Courts
Neilsen* 4.15 Neighborhood park
adjacent to Fresno Park
Barbecues, Baseball/Softball Fields,
Basketball Courts, Children’s Play
StructuresArea, Football/Soccer Field,
Picnic Tables, Restrooms, Benches,
Drinking Fountain
Almy Park* 0.41 New pocket park built by
Habitat for Humanity
Benches, Shade StructuresCanopy
Tent, Picnic Tables/Benches,
Children’s Play Structures
Hinton* 6.18
Just outside of the Plan
Area, but within walking
distance of Plan Area
residences; located next to
Barbecues, Baseball/Softball Fields,
Basketball/Tennis/Hockey Court,
Children’s Play Area, Football/Soccer
Field, Picnic Tables, Tennis Courts
August 8, 2017 | Page 12
Park
Name
Existing
Acreage Notes Existing Amenities
Cecil C. Hinton Community
Center
Bigby-Villa* 2.09
Pocket park just outside of
the Plan Area, but within
walking distance of Plan
Area residences; near Bigby
Villa Apartments
Children’s Play Area
Pride Park* 0.38
Pocket park just outside of
the Plan Area, but within
walking distance of Plan
Area residences and near
Franklin School
Benches, Trash Can, Porta Potty
Ponding
Basin/Park FF
1.47 Owned by FMFCD; this
acreage only accounts for
the portion that is usable
year-round
Barbecue Grills, Benches,
ShadeCanopy Structure, Drinking
Fountains, Picnic Tables, Picnic
Shelter, Children’s Play Structures
Ponding
Basin/Park
TT2
4.00 Owned by the FMFCD; this
acreage only accounts for
the portion that is most
accessible with amenities
during non-rainy seasons;
closed during rainy season
Benches, ShadeCanopy Structures,
Children’s Play Structures
Hyde* 16.03 Neighborhood park near
toxic site; on landfill
None
TOTAL
ACREAGE
43.5918.91 acres
Parkland-toResidents
Ratio
3.451.49 acres per 1,000 residents
* Parks owned by the City of Fresno.
Source: Acreage and list of amenities from City of Fresno.
August 8, 2017 | Page 13
Additionally, include language to Policy PF-1.3 on page 6-11 that includes the seeking of funds for the remediation of the Hyde Park open space, so it may be cleaned up for other potential uses.
Policy PF-1.3: Remediate toxic sites on and/or directly adjacent to existing parkland to improve the environmental health of the community and prepare the sites for other potential uses, with the remediation of Hyde Park being a high priority. Seek funds to implement remediation.
Public Comment: Concern that Washington Union school district does not show enough planned K12 schools to accommodate future population growth (page 6-12).
Revise Policy PF-5.1 on page 6-12 as follows. Note that this policy includes all three school districts in the Plan Area, not just Washington Union.
Work with school districts and public charter schools in siting new schools for anticipated potential increases in the Southwest Fresno residential population and the resulting impacts on school capacity and enrollment. If necessary, assist the school districts with future plan amendments to add new school sites.
Public Comment: The Implementation Chapter should include more detail in implementation priorities and cost estimates.
At their July 6, 2017 meeting, the Committee created implementation priorities to be added to the Draft Plan. One of the priorities was to “create a workforce policy that prioritizes local hiring in the 93706 zip code.” Add a new policy under Goal PF-7 on page 6-13 as follows:
Policy PF-7.4: Establish a workforce policy to encourage businesses and City programs in the Plan Area to hire Plan Area residents in the 93706 zip code, consistent with applicable laws.
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION
Public Comment: The Implementation Chapter should include more detail in implementation priorities and cost estimates.
Revise the “Implementation Action Plan” section of the Draft Plan to include implementation priorities as identified by the Steering Committee at their July 6, 2017 meeting with an accompanying figure (see page 16). The new implementation priorities take the place of the “easy short- term wins” in the Draft Plan. The implementation action plan tables will be revised prior to presenting the Draft Plan to the Planning Commission and City Council to reflect these new implementation priorities as well as any policy revisions that were made in other chapters, described in this memo.
See section on Chapter 3, Land Use on page 4 of this memo for the incorporation of one of the August 8, 2017 | Page 14
Committee’s implementation priorities, “Include an anti-displacement policy” as an additional policy to the Draft Plan.
See section on Chapter 6, Public Facilities on page 13 of this memo for the incorporation of one of the Committee’s implementation priorities, “create a workforce policy that prioritizes local hiring in the 93706 zip code.”
Revise the Implementation Action Plan section starting on page 8-17 as follows:
IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN
Tables 8-2 through 8-67 set forth the implementation action plan for the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan. The actions are organized into five categories:
• Land Use
• Community Resources
• Economic Development
• Infrastructure
• Mobility
• Parks
The highest implementation priority (or “#1 priority”) for the Plan is the Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard (MLK) Activity Center Magnet Core. This #1 priority acts as the “hub of a wheel,” with other supporting implementation priorities functioning and supporting elements of the #1 priority, like the spokes of the wheel. These implementation priorities are also contained in the implementation action plan, identified with a “P” for the #1 priority and “SP” for the supporting priorities. The #1 priority and its supporting priorities are shown on Figure 8-1 and are as follows:
LU-P1 (#1 Priority): MLK Activity Center Magnet Core – Incentivize and support development of the proposed Community College Campus
• I-P1: Underground infrastructure for MLK Activity Center Magnet Core (i.e., sewer, water, storm drain)
• M-P1: New Complete Streets for Church Avenue, MLK Jr. Boulevard, and Jensen Avenue o Restriping
o Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk
o Bike lanes
o Street trees, lighting
o Transit stops
Supporting Priorities
1. P-SP1: Build New Park at MLK Activity Center Magnet Core
2. M-SP1: Trails Network
• To connect to MLK Activity Center Magnet Core
• Other location
August 8, 2017 | Page 15
3. P-SP2A: Parks Improvement Plan
P-SP2B: Revitalize Existing Parks
4. LU-SP2: Marks Avenue/Whites Bridge Avenue Magnet Core
5. LU-SP3: Grocery Store or food coop at one of the Magnet Cores
6. ED-SP1: New Employment Training and Career Preparation Center and Workforce Policy
7. CR-SP1: Create an Implementation Oversight Committee to oversee implementation of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan
8. LU-SP4: Prioritize the California Ave BRT / Mixed Use corridor
9. LU-SP5: Anti-displacement Strategy and Programs
The implementation action plan identifies four actions as priorities. These relatively focused measures are intended to be implemented or at least started around the time the Plan is adopted to demonstrate to the community the City’s commitment to the Plan. These actions are highlighted as “easy short-term wins” for the Southwest Fresno community. The priority actions, identified with a “P” are:
o CR-P1: Implementation Oversight Committee
o ED-P1: Employment Skills and Training Workshop
o M-P1: Sidewalk Demonstration Project
o P-P1: New Park Priority Project
The implementation action plan is a framework. It is fully anticipated that, over time, the City will make adjustments to this plan.
41 41
180
99 99
NMX
NMX
O
O
O
O
R O
G
CMX
CMX CMX
C C
C
PB
PB
PB
PB
PB PBP PB
PB
PB
P
CP
CP
NP
NP
NP
CZ
RP
A
PG&E
HOSP
E
M
PB
PB
C
E
R C
NP*
NP*
E
C
NP
NP
E
M
NC
WR
NC
PBP
PF
PF
PF
C
NMX
C C
P
R
CZ
CMX
CMX
CMX
NMX
PF
OS OS
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
DANRONQUILLO DR
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
FIG AVENUE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD
HUGHES AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
FIGURE 8-1 Implementation Priorities Overlaid on Land Use Map for Plan Area 1 1
3 2
4 8
5 3
1 1
5 6 7 9
3 3
3 3
3 3
RESIDENTIAL EMPLOYMENT
MIXED-USE
PUBLIC FACILITIES OPEN SPACE
COMMERCIAL
O Office
Office Restricted
Automobile /Vehicle Sales and
Services are are not permitted
O No Auto
P Park
CZ Clear Zone
NP Neighborhood Park
CP Community Park
RP Regional Park
PB Ponding Basin
PBP Ponding Basin Park
NP* Neighborhood Park*
CMX Corridor/Center Mixed-Use
NMX Neighborhood Mixed-Use
SS Special School
C College
E Elementary School
PF Public Facility
M Middle School
A Airport
HOSP Hospital
NC Neighborhood Center
PG&E PG&E Station
Water Recharge
Basin
WR
R Regional
CH Church
C Community
*The exact location of the parks within the Mission Ranch development will be determined in a future planning process.
Medium Density (5 - 12 du/ac)
Medium High Density (12 - 16 du/ac)
Urban Neighborhood (16 - 30 du/ac)
Medium Low Density (3.5 - 6 du/ac)
Low Density (1 - 3.5 du/ac)
Office*
After 85% of the land in Fresno’s “Reverse
Triangle” is occupied with heavy industrial
uses, light industrial uses are permitted
O*
City Limit Sphere of Influence
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
Implementation Priorities 6, 7, and 9 are not associated to a location and are thus not shown on this map.
G General
OS Open Space
IMPLEMENTATION
PRIORITIES
Number 1
Priority
Supporting
Priorities
O
August 8, 2017 | Page 17
Revisions from the CEQA Analysis
Following are revisions recommended by the technical consultant team based on the recent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analysis for the Draft Plan. Add additional language to Policy PF-2.4 starting on page 6-11 to ensure that the acreage of existing and new parklands will be adequate for existing and new residents within the Plan Area:
Policy PF-2.4: Meet the General Plan’s parkland standard for at least three acres of parkland to be provided per 1,000 residents for all parkland less than 40 acres in size owned and/or maintained by the City of Fresno, San Joaquin River Parkway, FMFCD ponding basin/parks, owned and maintained by an HOA and publically accessible (no gate), and where there is little likelihood that the use or access will change, while striving for five acres of parkland to be provided per 1,000 residents which includes all parkland counted toward three acres per 1,000 residents, all parkland 40 acres or greater in size, and all trails of any size. As new development occurs in the Plan Area, monitor residential population growth compared to development of new parklands to meet the three acres of parkland to be provided per 1,000 residents ratio. If the ratio is not met, explore additional ways to increase the amount of dedicated parkland in the Plan Area, including but not limited to designating additional lands for parkland development.
Add a new goal and policy after Goal LU-10 on page 3-15 in Chapter 3, Land Use, that addresses green building code standards for new development:
Goal LU-11: Promote sustainable, or “green”, building standards for new development to help improve the overall air quality of the Plan Area.
Policy LU-11.1: Encourage compliance with voluntary residential and non-residential California Green Building Code (CALGreen) standards through the creation of CALGreen incentive programs. Revise Policy LU-8.4 on page 3-15 to include “vibration” in the list of performance standard types on the operation of existing industrial activity.
Policy LU-8.4: In collaboration with the appropriate local, State, and/or federal agency, regularly enforce and evaluate performance and performance standards on the operation of existing industrial activity related to air quality, odor, and noise, and vibration in order to maintain compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods and uses.
Fehr & Peers’ traffic analysis for the Plan’s EIR proposes revised and specific changes to the planned roadway network in Southwest Fresno when compared to the roadway network inputs in the Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR). Based on Fehr & Peers’ analysis, Figure 5-5 (see page 21) and the text under the “Vehicles” section on page 5-10 of the Plan should be revised as follows:
August 8, 2017 | Page 18
In addition to these proposed improvements, tThe Plan recommends a few additional or alternative improvements to the GP MEIR’s planned roadway improvements to accommodate the Plan’s proposed development patterns and capacity. Table 5-1 and Figure 5-5 shows the Plan’s recommendations to key streets within the Plan Area, which are also described below:. Note that proposed improvement numbers 4, 5, and partially 8 are located outside the Plan Area and are recommended to provide continuity with roadways in the Plan Area. These recommendations could be incorporated as future amendments to the General Plan and Downtown Neighborhoods Community Plan (DNCP).
o Additional roadway lanes may be required on the Regional Retail Corridor along Whites Bridge Avenue compared to the planned number of lanes identified in the GP MEIR. The GP MEIR shows a planned two-lane roadway (one lane each direction) on Whites Bridge Avenue, and instead, four or six lanes could be needed depending on the intensity of the regional retail.
o Additional roadway lanes for key connections near magnet cores may be necessary, such as along Hughes Avenue around the Regional Retail Magnet Core and along Walnut Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard around the Community College Magnet Core. o A complete streets approach is recommended for all of the Plan’s identified corridors.
Existing and planned four-lane facilities and could instead be reduced to two lanes if additional capacity is provided on parallel facilities.
TABLE 5-1. SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN NUMBER OF LANES FROM FRESNO GP MEIR Id Roadway Segment
Number of Lanes
GP MEIR1 PROPOSED SWFSP2
1 Marks Ave. SR 180 to Whites
Bridge Avenue
4 6 Divided
2 Whites Bridge
Ave.
Marks Avenue to
Roeding Drive
2 4 Divided – Marks to Hughes
2 Divided – Hughes to Roeding
3 West Ave. Channing Ave. to
Kearney Blvd.
2 2 Divided – Whites Bridge to Kearney
4 California Ave. Walnut Ave. to
MLK Jr. Blvd.
4 2 + TWTL
5 Walnut Ave. California Ave. to
Church Ave.
4 2 Undivided
6 Walnut Ave. Church Ave. to
Jensen Ave.
4 2 + TWLTL
7 Church Ave. Walnut Ave. to
Clara Ave.
2 2 + TWLTL
8 Elm Ave. California Ave. to
North Ave.
4 2 Divided
August 8, 2017 | Page 19
Id Roadway Segment
Number of Lanes
GP MEIR1 PROPOSED SWFSP2
9 Jensen Ave. Elm Ave. to SR 41 4 4 Divided
10 North Ave. MLK Jr. Blvd. to
Elm Ave.
4 3 2 + TWLTL
Notes: 1Based on figures in Appendix H-7 of the Fresno General Plan MEIR (2014). The General Plan MEIR did not indicate whether roadways would have a raised median, two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL), or be undivided. 2 Proposed changes for the Plan are based on traffic analysis for the Plan’s PEIR. Additional detailed notes are provided below. 3 Although the Fresno MEIR shows this segment as 4 lanes, the more recent 41 + North Corridor Complete Streets Plan proposed this segment to have 2 lanes + TWLTL or Median instead.
TWLTL = two-way left-turn lane
Divided = raised median or TWLTL used to separate opposing travel directions; decision to install raised median or TWLTL should be determined based on surrounding land uses, demand for access, or need for access control.
Undivided = no raised median or TWLTL separating opposing travel directions.
1. Marks Avenue: SR 180 to Whites Bridge Avenue. Northbound Marks Avenue already provides sufficient capacity (2 through lanes; 2 lanes onto SR 180 eastbound on-ramp).
Southbound Marks Avenue may need an additional travel lane to serve future traffic demand.
2. Whites Bridge Avenue: Marks Avenue to Roeding Drive. Four lanes are necessary to serve the planned Regional Retail Magnet Core between Marks and Hughes Avenues.
3. Roeding Drive/West Avenue: Whites Bridge Avenue to Kearney Boulevard. Maintaining the existing 2-lane cross-section from Whites Bridge Avenue south to Kearney Boulevard would sufficiently serve traffic demand near Chandler Airport.
4. California Avenue: Walnut Avenue to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Traffic demand can be adequately served with the existing 2 lanes plus TWLTL cross-section. Widening to 4 lanes, as identified in the General Plan MEIR, would likely require right-of-way (ROW) acquisition.
5. Walnut Avenue: California Avenue to Church Avenue. Future traffic demand is at the upper end of the capacity for a 2-lane roadway, which indicates that a TWLTL or widening to 4 lanes may be necessary to provide sufficient capacity. However, right-of-way constraints between California Avenue and Church Avenue may preclude widening to provide a TWLTL or additional through lanes (i.e., widen to a 4-lane roadway). The General Plan MEIR identified 4 lanes along the Plumas Street alignment, curving back to Walnut Avenue just north of Church Avenue. This curve has since been removed through the DNCP and amended General Plan.
6. Walnut Avenue: Church Avenue to Jensen Avenue. Traffic demand can be adequately served with 2 lanes plus TWLTL. Four lanes identified in General Plan MEIR are not necessary to serve traffic demand and would be challenging to implement between Grove August 8, 2017 | Page 20
Avenue and Jensen Avenue through existing neighborhood without further ROW acquisition.
7. Church Avenue: Walnut Avenue to Clara Avenue. Traffic demand is expected to be greater on Church Avenue compared to the General Plan MEIR with the addition of the proposed magnet core in the quarter-section bounded by Church Avenue, Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard, Jensen Avenue, and Knight Avenue. Traffic demand on this segment indicates that four lanes would be necessary to avoid over-capacity conditions. However, this segment of Church Avenue would serve a community college, neighborhood mixed-use, community commercial, and medium-density residential uses in the proposed MLK Activity Center Magnet Core, in addition to Gaston Middle School a short distance away.
Given the nature of these uses, providing wide sidewalks, attractive bikeways, and transit facilities along this corridor in accordance with the Complete Streets Design Guidelines and policies in the Plan will encourage non-vehicular travel for this pedestrian activity center. Furthermore, the Fresno ATP shows that a Class I bike path is planned along this segment of Church Avenue to further support walking and biking. As such, it is justified for the City to accept a lower LOS for this corridor and provide fewer travel lanes for vehicular traffic to maintain and prioritize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes. Improvements to Church Avenue should consider:
• Available right-of-way/curb-to-curb width for existing built-up areas • Plans for multimodal facilities, such as bikeways, sidewalks, etc. • Need for on-street parking to serve fronting development • Driveway frequency and access demand (i.e., higher demand/more frequent driveways to access fronting development would make TWLTL more necessary)
8. Elm Avenue: California Avenue to North Avenue. Two lanes are sufficient to serve future traffic demand. The existing 4-lane cross-section could be repurposed to provide a more multimodal corridor, including the following possible options:
• Enhanced streetscape with wider sidewalks
• Enhanced bikeways (i.e., cycle track or buffered bike lane) • Increased on-street parking
• Transit-only lanes to support future bus rapid transit (BRT) These improvements would support the Corridor/Center Mixed-Use and Neighborhood Mixed-Use land use designations along the Elm Avenue corridor.
9. Jensen Avenue: Elm Avenue to SR 41. Traffic demand on this segment indicates that six lanes would be necessary to serve traffic demand traveling to/from SR 41 at LOS D or better. However, right-of-way constraints, on-street parking demand, and balancing the mobility needs with the City’s focus on supporting walking, biking, and transit to create a multimodal network would make widening to six lanes infeasible. Therefore, the Plan maintains the existing four-lane configuration.
1 Existing Number of Lanes
1 2
3 4
MAGNET
MAGNET
180
99 99
41 41
WEST AVE
CRYSTAL AVE
C ALIFORNIA CT TEILMAN AVE
JENSEN AVE VAGEDESAVE ATCHISON ST
OLEANDER AVE
ARTHUR AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
NIELSEN AVE
HOLLY AVE
CLARA AVE
WOODWARD AVE
LEAD AVE
LILY AVE
BLOSSER AVE
GEORGEAVE
ILA AVE
CALWA AVE
LORENA AVE
KNIGHT AVE
CHURCH RD
DUNN AVE
BELG RAVIAAVE
DELNOAVE
HAWESAVE
MYERS AVE
GEARY ST
VALENCIA AVE
EDEN AVE
BYRD AVE
KAVILAND AVE
GROVE AVE
GARRETT AVE
FLORENCEAVE
TE ILMAN I C R
PLEASANT AVE
VINE AVE
DOROTHY AVE
LAFAYETTE AVE
SAMSON AVE
FRUIT AVE
THORNE AVE
BARDELL ST
LA SIERRADR
ELM AVE
KIRK ST
NORTH AVE
ANNADALE AVE
ALMY AVE
ROY AVE
ROEDING DR
TULARE S
G
T
ST
PLUMAS ST
PICKFORD AVE
DIVISADERO ST
MERCED ST
R ST
LOS ANGELES ST
NICHOLAS AVE
C ST
MONTEREYST
BRALY AVE
TUOLUMNE ST
A ST
SAN BENITO ST
STANISLAUS ST
WOODWARD AVE
M ST
CALAVERAS ST
BROADWAY PLZ
VENTURA ST
RAILROAD AVE
MARIPOSA ST
SANTA FE AVE
PARKWAY DR
ROOSEVELT AVE
ANNA ST
BLACKSTONE AVE BELGRAVIA AVE
ILLINOIS AVE
GRANT AVE
H ST
AMADOR ST
E ST
WATERMAN AVE
MAYOR AVE
U ST
KLETTE AVE
MARIPOSA ST
JONES AVE
IRWIN AVE
KERN ST
INYO ST
MONO ST
SANTACLARA ST
STROTHER AVE
IVY AVE
O ST
FAIRVIEW AVE
B ST
ARTHUR AVE
FRUIT AVE
EL DORADO ST
CHERRY AVE
PACIFIC AVE
FULTON MALL
TUPMAN ST
CAPITOL ST
T ST
LEMON AVE
ONEILAVE
GENEVA AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
CHINA ALY F ST
EUNICE AVE
HOME RUN ALY
L ST
COLLINS AVE
S ST
A/B ALY
FAGAN ALY
Q ST
WELLER ST
FERGER AVE
POPPY AVE
HUMBOLDT AVE
WAYTE LN
NAPA AVE
LOTUS AVE
FERGER/PALM ALY
EDGAR AVE
AIRPORT RD
GOLDEN STATE BLVD
WALNUT AVE
VAN NESS AVE
TRINITY ST
MODOC ST
CHANNINGWAY
FULTON ST
FRESNO ST POTTLE AVE
ECHO AVE
MARTIN AVE
MAUD AVE
P ST
N ST
CHANDLER AVE LEE AVE
ROSE AVE
MADDY DR
PALM AVE
OC LL GE E V/ ANNESSALY
SARAH ST
GLENN/SAN PABLO ALY
BROADWAY
STEPHENS AVE
FARRIS AVE
MARKS AVE
JENSEN AVE
CHURCH AVE
VALENTINE AVE
MADISON AVE
KEARNEY BLVD
H
FRUIT AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELM AVE
UGHES AVE HUGHES AVE
WEST AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
VALENTINE AVE
BRAWLEY AVE
CENTRAL AVE
ANNADALE AVE
NORTH AVE
MARKS AVE
CALIFORNIA AVE
WHITES BRIDGE AVE
MLK JR. BLVD FIG AVE
Sphere of Influence
City Limit
0 0.25mi 0.25mi
Plan Area
FIGURE 5-5 Existing and Planned Number of Roadway Lanes Number of Roadway Lanes*
1 Lane
2 Lanes
3 Lanes
4 Lanes
# Increase in Number of Lanes
1 2
3 4
5 #
6 7
8 9
10 #
Reduction in Number of Lanes
Sources: City of Fresno; 2035 Fresno General Plan
Southwest Fresno Specific Plan’s Proposed Changes in Number of Lanes *Based on figures in Appendix H-7 of the Fresno General Plan MEIR (2014).
S CLARA AVE
No change in Number of Lanes, but Divided
August 8, 2017 | Page 22
10. North Avenue: Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to Elm Avenue. The 41+North Corridor Complete Streets Plan changed the plan for North Avenue from a 4-lane divided roadway (in the General Plan MEIR) to a 2-lane with a TWLTL configuration. Our initial traffic analysis shows that the 2-lane with TWLTL configuration is at the upper end of the capacity for this configuration.
........................................................................................................................
A PPENDIX C
A IR Q UALITY AND G REENHOUSE
G AS D ATA
........................................................................................................................
Regional Construction Emissions Worksheet (Annual) - Unmitigated Annual Emissions (Tons/Yr)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
2018 105 54 48 0 13 5
2019 38 40 34 0 10 3
2020 4 29 25 0 7 2
2021 3 26 22 0 7 2
2022 3 24 20 0 7 2
2023 3 19 19 0 7 2
2024 3 19 17 0 7 2
2025 3 19 16 0 7 2
2026 2 19 15 0 7 2
2027 2 18 15 0 7 2
2028 2 18 14 0 7 2
2029 2 18 13 0 7 2
2030 2 17 13 0 7 2
2031 2 17 12 0 7 2
2032 2 17 12 0 7 2
2033 2 17 11 0 7 2
2034 2 17 11 0 7 2
2035 1 17 10 0 7 2
2036 1 13 8 0 5 1
Max Annual Emissions 105 54 48 0 13 5
Regional Thresholds 10 10 100 27 15 15
Exceed Thresholds? Yes Yes No No No No
Regional Operational Emissions Worksheet
Regional Emission (Tons/Yr)
Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Non-Residential
Area 35.632 1.337 22.017 0.008 0.208 0.208
Energy 0.539 4.764 3.151 0.029 0.372 0.372
Mobile 25.807 453.812 253.669 2.423 176.432 48.049
Total 61.978 459.913 278.837 2.460 177.012 48.629
Residential
Area 37.923 1.939 31.876 0.012 0.302 0.302
Energy 0.550 4.699 2.000 0.030 0.380 0.380
Mobile 4.302 75.642 42.282 0.404 29.408 8.009
Total 42.774 82.280 76.157 0.446 30.089 8.690
Combined
Area 73.555 3.276 53.893 0.020 0.510 0.510
Energy 1.088 9.463 5.150 0.059 0.752 0.752
Mobile 30.109 529.454 295.952 2.827 205.840 56.058
Total 104.752 542.193 354.994 2.906 207.101 57.319
Regional Thresholds 10 10 100 27 15 15
Exceeds Thresholds? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
GHG Emissions Worksheet
Proposed Project Buildout
Year MTons Total
2018 13,504.93
2019 11,597.20
2020 10,244.92
2021 9,997.67
2022 9,750.08
2023 9,458.90
2024 9,331.38
2025 9,102.44
2026 8,951.05
2027 8,797.39
2028 8,630.72
2029 8,545.83
2030 8,482.36
2031 8,394.08
2032 8,351.88
2033 8,225.52
2034 8,172.97
2035 8,160.15
2036 6,565.64
Total 174,265.11
Year 2035 Emission Rates
Source Buildout MTCO2e/Year Percent of Project Total
Non-Residential
Area 1,304.35 0%
Energy - New Buildings 21,289.99 6%
Mobile1 227,407.69 68%
Waste 14,659.58 4%
Water 617.56 0%
Total All Sectors 265,279.15
Residential
Area 1,891.85 1%
Energy - New Buildings 16,693.66 5%
Mobile1 37,904.78 11%
Waste 3,894.47 1%
Water 1,231.89 0%
Total All Sectors 61,616.65
Combined
Area 3,196.19 1%
Energy - New Buildings 37,983.64 11%
Mobile1 265,312.47 80%
Waste 18,554.05 6%
Water 1,849.45 1%
Amortized Construction Emissions2 5,808.84 2%
Total All Sectors 332,705 100%
Assumed Bright-Line Screening Threshold 900
Exceed Threshold? Yes
1 Based on year 2035 emission rates.
2 Total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years based on SCAQMD methodology; SCAQMD. 2010, September 28. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 15. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/2010/sept28mtg/sept29.html.
CalEEMod Land Use Inputs: Full Buildout Summary (Proposed New Uses) Type Land Use Type
Land Use Unit
Amount
Land Use Size
Metric Lot Acreage
Land Use Square
Feet
Residential Single Family 4,221 DU 823.55 7,597,800
Residential Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910 DU 103.55 2,910,000 Retail Regional Shopping Center 403.370 100BSF 37.04 403,370 Retail Strip Mall 1,294.669 1000bsf 138.72 1,294,669
Commercial General Office 2,489.065 1000bsf 114.28 2,489,065 Education Junior College (2yr) 308.493 1000bsf 23.61 308,493 Commercial Government Office Building 16.988 1000bsf 1.95 16,988 Parking Other Non-Asphalt 42.626 Acre 42.63 0
1,285.32
Project Location: Fresno County SJVAPCD
Climate Zone: 3
Operation Year: 2040
Land Use Setting: Urban
Utility Company: PG&E
Land Uses/Development
Buildout Land Uses
Population: Persons
Employment: Employees
Service Population (Residents/Employees): 0 persons
Land Uses Square Footage DU Lot Acreage
Single Family 7,597,800 4,221 823.55
Apartments Mid-Rise 2,910,000 2,910 103.55
Subtotal 10,507,800 7,131 927.10
Regional Shopping Center 403,370 0 37.04
Strip Mall 1,294,669 0 138.72
General Office 2,489,065 0 114.28
Junior College (2yr) 308,493 0 23.61
Government Office Building (Airport) 16,988 0 1.95
Parking Non-Asphalt (ROW) 0 0 42.63
Subtotal 4,512,586 0 358 1,285.319998
Trip Generation
Total Future Cumulative Daily Trips: 224,634 trip ends
Total Future Cumulative Daily Vehicle Miles: 1,806,108 miles Average Trip Length 8.04 mi/trip end
Project Trips and VMT
Existing Daily Trips 32,343 trip ends
Existing Plus Project Daily Trips: 215,196 trip ends
Proposed Project Daily Trips: 182,853 trip ends 535,145,280 Land Use Trips Per Day** Trip Generation Rate
Single Family 26,122 6.19 210,026 76449325.74
Apartments Mid-Rise 26,122 8.98 210,026 76449325.74
Regional Shopping Center 26,122 64.76 210,026 76449325.74 Strip Mall 26,122 20.18 210,026 76449325.74
General Office 26,122 10.49 210,026 76449325.74
Junior College (2yr) 26,122 84.68 210,026 76449325.74
Government Office Building (Airport) 26,122 1537.63 210,026 76449325.74 Parking Non-Asphalt (ROW) 0 0 1,470,179 535,145,280
Total 182,853 NA
*Based on information provided by Fehr & Peers.
**For purposes of this analysis, vehicle trips and miles traveled are proportioned equally between the land uses.
Water Use
CalEEMod Inputs
Land Use Total Water Demand (gpy)1, 2 Indoor (gpy)1, 2 Outdoor (gpy)3 Single Family 953,576,134 398,151,123 555,425,011
Apartment Mid-Rise 181,752,110 141,029,602 40,722,508
Regional Shopping Center 22,983,583 12,167,779 10,815,804 Strip Mall 90,367,774 96,707,226 0
General Office 66,740,759 33,370,379 33,370,379
Junior College (2yr) 24,126,106 12,063,053 12,063,053
Government Office Building 1,209,975 213,525 996,450
Other Non-Asphalt 3,397,567 1,956,347 1,441,220
Total 1,344,154,008 695,659,035 654,834,425
1 Based on water demand and wastewater generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on 365 days per year.
3 Outdoor water used is assumed to be the difference between total water demand and indoor (wastewater) use.
Solid Waste*
Land Use
Annual Solid Waste Generated
(tpy)1, 2
Single Family 7,744
Apartment Mid-Rise 2,963
Regional Shopping Center 2,650
Strip Mall 11,416
General Office 10,902
Junior College (2yr) 1,126
Government Office Building 93
Other Non-Asphalt 0
Total 36,895
1 Based on solid waste generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on 365 days per year.
Electricity (Buildings)
Architectural Coating
Land Use Land Use Amount (BSF)
CalEEMod Paintable
Surface Area
Multiplier*
Total Paintable
Surface Area
(BSF)
Total Paintable Interior
Surface Area (BSF)*
Total Paintable
Exterior Surface
Area (BSF)*
Regional Shopping Center 403,370 2.0 806,740 605,055 201,685 Strip Mall 1,294,669 2.0 2,589,339 1,942,004 647,335
General Office 2,489,065 2.0 4,978,129 3,733,597 1,244,532 Junior College (2yr) 308,493 2.0 616,986 462,740 154,247 Government Office Building 16,988 2.0 33,977 25,483 8,494 Non-Residential Sub-Total 6,768,879 2,256,293
Single Family 7,597,800 2.7 20,514,060 15,385,545 5,128,515 Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910,000 2.7 7,857,000 5,892,750 1,964,250 Residential Sub-Total 21,278,295 7,092,765
*Based on CalEEMod methodology in calculating the paintable surface areas for a residential and nonresidential building.
Buildings constructed after January 1, 2017 are required to meet the 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. The 2016 Standards are 5% more energy efficient for non-residential buildings and 28% more energy efficient for residential buildings than the 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.
Water Demand Calcuation Worksheet1
Land Use
Abbreviation
Proposed
SWSP Per BFC
Proposed
SWSP Per PW2
Water Flow
Factor (gpd/ac)
Master Plan
(Mgpy)
SWSP
(Mgpy)
cbp Employment - Business Park 0.0 0.0 1700 0.0 0.0
cc Commercial - Community 109.8 62.5 1500 60.1 34.2
cgh Commercial - General 0.4 0.0 1700 0.2 0.0
cmx Corridor/Center Mixed Use 96.3 57.5 1700 59.7 35.7
co Employment - Office 195.0 114.3 1600 113.9 66.7
cr Commercial - Regional 63.5 37.0 1700 39.4 23.0
cz Clear Zone 13.9 11.9 0 0.0 0.0
hwy Commercial - Highway & Auto 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
ih Industrial - Heavy 0.0 0.0 1200 0.0 0.0
il Industrial - Light 0.0 0.0 1800 0.0 0.0
nmx Neighborhood Mixed Use 136.3 18.7 3000 149.2 20.4
obp Open Space - Ponding Basin 180.4 21.4 250 16.5 2.0
obpp Open Space - Ponding Basin 29.0 0.0 250 2.6 0.0
orp Open Space - Park 1.6 0.0 1500 0.9 0.0
orpc Open Space - Community Park 1.9 0.0 1500 1.1 0.0
orpn Open Space - Neighborhood Park 4.5 0.0 1500 2.5 0.0 orpr Open Space - Regional Park 134.6 0.0 1500 73.7 0.0 os Open Space - Unspecified 18.3 2.6 1500 10.0 1.4
pa Public Facilities - Airport 2.0 2.0 1700 1.2 1.2
pc Public Facilities - College 23.6 23.6 2800 24.1 24.1 pf Public Facilities 137.4 0.0 700 35.1 0.0
pnc Public Facilities - Neighborhood Center 5.4 0.0 1200 2.4 0.0 pqch Public Facilities - Church 0.0 0.0 1200 0.0 0.0
pqge Public Facilities - PG&E Substatoin 3.8 0.0 1700 2.4 0.0 pqmh Public Facilites - Hospital 5.1 0.0 2000 3.7 0.0
pse Public Facilities - Elementary School 18.0 0.0 2600 17.0 0.0 psm Public Facilities - Middle School 38.9 0.0 2600 37.0 0.0 pwrb Public Facilites - Water Recharge 6.7 6.7 0 0.0 0.0 rh Residential High Density 0.0 17.7 3400 0.0 22.0
rl Residential Low Density 41.4 6.6 1600 24.2 3.9
rm Residential Medium Density 873.8 377.4 3750 1,196.0 516.5 rmh Residential Medium High Density 33.8 0.0 4200 51.8 0.0 rml Residential Medim Low Density 511.8 439.5 2700 504.4 433.2 run Residential Urban Neighborhood Density 107.3 85.8 5100 199.8 159.8 2,794.5 1,285.3 Total 2,628.9 1,344.15401
1 Based on water demand rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on the Dual Land Use Scenario.
WATER COMPARISON
Wastewater Calcuation Worksheet1
Land Use
Abbreviation
Proposed
SWSP Per BFC
Proposed
SWSP Per PW2
Wastewater
Flow Factor
(gpd/ac)
Master Plan
Wastewater
Usage (Mgpy)
SWSP
Wastewater
Usage (Mgpy)
cbp Employment - Business Park 0.0 0.0 1100 0.0 0.0
cc Commercial - Community 109.8 62.5 800 32.1 18.3
cgh Commercial - General 0.4 0.0 950 0.1 0.0
cmx Corridor/Center Mixed Use 96.3 57.5 3250 114.2 68.2 co Employment - Office 195.0 114.3 800 56.9 33.4
cr Commercial - Regional 63.5 37.0 900 20.9 12.2
cz Clear Zone 13.9 11.9 0 0.0 0.0
hwy Commercial - Highway & Auto 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
nmx Neighborhood Mixed Use 136.3 18.7 1500 74.6 10.2
obp Open Space - Ponding Basin 180.4 21.4 250 16.5 2.0
orp Open Space - Park 1.6 0.0 250 0.1 0.0
orpc Open Space - Community Park 1.9 0.0 500 0.4 0.0
orpn Open Space - Neighborhood Park 4.5 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
orpr Open Space - Regional Park 134.6 0.0 300 14.7 0.0
os Open Space - Unspecified 18.3 2.6 0 0.0 0.0
pa Public Facilities - Airport 2.0 2.0 300 0.2 0.2
pc Public Facilities - College 23.6 23.6 1400 12.1 12.1 pf Public Facilities 137.4 0.0 300 15.0 0.0
pse Public Facilities - Elementary School 18.0 0.0 700 4.6 0.0 psm Public Facilities - Middle School 38.9 0.0 700 9.9 0.0 pwrb Public Facilites - Water Recharge 6.7 6.7 0 0.0 0.0 rh Residential High Density 0.0 17.7 3400 0.0 22.0
rl Residential Low Density 41.4 6.6 600 9.1 1.5
rm Residential Medium Density 873.8 377.4 900 287.0 124.0 rmh Residential Medium High Density 33.8 0.0 2800 34.5 0.0 rml Residential Medim Low Density 511.8 439.5 1700 317.6 272.7 run Residential Urban Neighborhood Density 107.3 85.8 3800 148.9 119.0 2,794.5 1,285.3 Total 1,180.7 695.7
1 Based on wastewater generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on the Dual Land Use Scenario.
WASTEWATER COMPARISON
Solid Waste Calcuation Worksheet1
Classification
Category
Land Use
Abbreviation Land Use
Calrecycle
Classification
SWSP
(area in
Acres)2
Unit per
Acre or
FAR
Solid Waste
Generation
Rate
Solid Waste
Generation Unit
SWSP
Estimated
Waste
Generation
(tons/year)
Commercial cbp Employment - Business Park Office 0.00 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial cc Commercial - Community Retail 62.54 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 5,966 Commercial cgh Commercial - General Retail 0.00 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Mixed Use cmx Corridor/Center Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use 57.51 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 4,115 Commercial co Employment - Office Office 114.28 2.0 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 10,902 Commercial cr Commercial - Regional Commercial Mixed Use 37.04 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 2,650 Commercial crbp Emplyment - Regional Businees Park Commercial Mixed Use 0.00 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public cz Clear Zone Zero Waste 11.89 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial hwy Commercial - Highway & Auto Industrial 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial ih Industrial - Heavy Industrial 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Commercial il Industrial - Light Industrial 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Mixed Use nmx Neighborhood Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use 18.67 1.5 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 1,336 Public obp Open Space - Ponding Basin Zero Waste 21.44 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public obpp Open Space - Ponding Basin (b) Zero Waste 0.00 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orp Open Space - Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orpc Open Space - Community Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orpn Open Space - Neighborhood Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public orpr Open Space - Regional Park Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pa Public Facilities - Airport Transportaion 1.95 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 93 Public pc Public Facilities - College Education 23.61 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 1,126 Public pf Public Facilities Public (NEC) 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pnc Public Facilities - Neighborhood Center Education 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pqch Public Facilities - Church Public/Institutional 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pqge Public Facilities - PG&E Substatoin Utilities 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pqmh Public Facilites - Hospital Hospital 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pse Public Facilities - Elementary School Schools 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public psm Public Facilities - Middle School Schools 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pss Public Facilites - Special School Schools 0.00 1 6 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Public pwrb Public Facilites - Water Recharge Zero Waste 6.66 0 0 lbs per 1000 sq ft/day 0 Residential rh Residential High Density Multi Family 17.72 19.5 7 lbs per unit/day 442 Residential rl Residential Low Density Single Family 6.64 3 10 lbs per unit/day 36 Residential rm Residential Medium Density Multi Family 377.38 8.5 7 lbs per unit/day 4,098 Residential rmh Residential Medium High Density Multi Family 0.00 14 7 lbs per unit/day 0 Residential rml Residential Medium Low Density Multi Family 439.53 4.5 10 lbs per unit/day 3,610 Residential run Residential Urban Neighborhood Density Multi Family 85.82 23 7 lbs per unit/day 2,522 1282.69 36,895
1 Based on solid waste generation rates provided by Blair, Church, & Flair Consulting Engineers. 2 Based on the Dual Land Use Scenario. 0
CalEEMod Construction Run Land Use Inputs:
Type Land Use Type
Land Use Unit
Amount
Land Use
Size Metric Lot Acreage
Land Use
Square Feet
Residential Single Family 4,221.0 DU 823.6 7,597,800.0
Residential Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910.0 DU 103.5 2,910,000.0 Retail Regional Shopping Center 403.4 100BSF 37.0 403,370.2 Retail Strip Mall 1,294.7 1000bsf 138.7 1,294,669.4
Commercial General Office 2,489.1 1000bsf 114.3 2,489,064.6 Education Junior College (2yr) 308.5 1000bsf 23.6 308,493.1 Commercial Government Office Building 17.0 1000bsf 2.0 16,988.4 Parking Other Non-Asphalt 42.6 Acre 42.6 0.0
1,285.32 15,020,386
Project Location: Fresno County SJVAPCD
Climate Zone: 3
Operation Year 2035
Land Use Setting Urban
Utility Company PG&E
Architectural Coating
VOC content of 150 grams per liter (CalEEMod default), per SJVAPCD Rule 4601, Architectural Coatings.
Land Use Land Use Amount (BSF)
CalEEMod
Paintable
Surface Area
Multiplier*
Total
Paintable
Surface Area
(BSF)
Total Paintable
Interior Surface
Area (BSF)*
Total
Paintable
Exterior
Surface Area
(BSF)*
Regional Shopping Center 403,370 2.0 806,740 605,055 201,685 Strip Mall 1,294,669 2.0 2,589,339 1,942,004 647,335
General Office 2,489,065 2.0 4,978,129 3,733,597 1,244,532 Junior College (2yr) 308,493 2.0 616,986 462,740 154,247 Government Office Building 16,988 2.0 33,977 25,483 8,494 Non-Residential Sub-Total 6,768,879 2,256,293
Single Family 7,597,800 2.7 20,514,060 15,385,545 5,128,515 Apartment Mid-Rise 2,910,000 2.7 7,857,000 5,892,750 1,964,250 Residential Sub-Total 21,278,295 7,092,765
*Based on CalEEMod methodology in calculating the paintable surface areas for a residential and nonresidential building.
Construction Phasing
5-Day Work Week
CalEEMod Default Schedule
Phase Name* Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Days
Demolition 1/1/2018 4/28/2056 10,000
Site Preparation 4/29/2056 4/2/2079 6,000
Grading 4/29/2079 9/26/2138 15,500
Building Construction 9/27/2138 11/11/2732 155,000
Paving 11/12/2732 1/10/2775 11,000
Architectural Coating 1/11/2775 3/10/2817 11000
Duration 789.8 years
Adjusted CalEEMod Default Schedule - with Overlap (Normalized for 25 year Buildout) Phase Name Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Days
Demolition 1/1/2018 3/19/2019 317
Site Preparation 1/1/2018 9/21/2018 190
Grading 1/1/2018 11/18/2019 491
Building Construction 1/1/2018 10/20/2036 4,906
Paving 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 348
Architectural Coating*** 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 348
*CalEEMod default schedule.
**Assumes duration as 33 percent of the Building Construction phase duration.
Construction Equipment Mix:
Equipment Pieces of Equipment Hrs Op HP LF Total Days
Worker Trips/
Day
CalEEMod
Vendor
Building Demolition Default Default+2
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.40
Excavators 3 8 158 0.37
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 247 0.40
Water truck* 1 2
Site Preparation Default Default+2
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 247 0.40
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 97 0.37
Water truck* 1 2
Rough Grading Default Default+2
Excavators 2 8 158 0.38
Graders 1 8 157 0.41
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40
Scrapers 2 8 367
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 97 0.37
Water truck* 1 2
Building Construction* Default Default
Cranes 1 7 231 0.29
Forklifts 3 8 89 0.20
Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37
Welders 1 8 46 0.45
Asphalt Paving Default Default+8
Pavers 2 8 130 0.42
Paving Equipment 2 8 132 0.36
Rollers 2 8 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Default Default
Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48
*Assumes water truck and two trips per day for the water truck.
GHG Emissions Target Setting - Forecasting the 2030 Efficiency Target 2020 Scoping Plan Emissions Inventory
1990 End Use Sector MTCOe2 Notes
Electricity 96,100,000 Removed Industrial
Transportation 137,990,000 On-Road Only
Landfills 6,260,000 Landfill Extracted from Industrial
Wastewater 3,170,000 Wastewater Treatment Extracted from Industrial Commercial 13,860,000 Removed National Security
Residential 29,660,000 Includes all
TOTAL LAND USE 287,040,000
2030 Scoping Plan Emissions Inventory
End Use Sector 2030 MMTCO2e
Reference
Scenario
Scoping Plan
Scenario Change
Percent
Change Sector Definition
Residential 47.6 38.4 -9.2 -19.3% Residential final energy consumption Commercial 37.2 26.8 -10.4 -27.8% Commercial final energy consumption Transportation 123.1 104.1 -19 -15.5% Transportation energy consumption Industrial* 32.2 27.7 -4.5 -14.0% Industrial manufacturing final energy consumption, Oil & Gas Extraction* 11.6 11.2 -0.4 -3.4% Energy used in the extraction of oil and gas Petroleum Refining* 42.8 36.8 -5.9 -13.9% Energy used in petroleum Refining Agriculture 7.9 6 -1.9 -24.1%
Energy use of physical infrastructure of agriculture, like buildings and pumps
Transportation Communications and Utilities 5.7 4.3 -1.4 -23.8% Transportation Communications and Utilities (TCU)
energy supports public infrastructure, like street lighting and waste treatment facilities
Non-Energy GHGs* 84.3 49.4 -34.9 -41.40%
Examples of non-energy GHG emissions include methane
and N2O emissions from agriculture and waste,
refrigerant F-gases, and emissions from cement
production
Solid Waste Non-Energy GHGs 10.73 9.17 -1.56 -14.54% Isolated the Solid Waste Subsector Unspecified 0 0 0 n/a
392.4 304.8 -87.6 -22.30%
GAP* Cap-and-Trade (Industrial Sectors) -132.4 -44.8
*Cap-and-Trade & new 20% Industrial Measure to Cover GAP Source: CARB 1990 Inventory. California Air Resources Board. 2007, November. California Greenhouse Gas Inventory (millions of metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent) — Summary by Economic Sector.
Source: Pathways Main Outputs Final (Jan 2017). California Air Resources Board. 2017, January 20. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update: The Proposed Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf.
GHG Emissions Target Setting - Forecasting the 2030 Efficiency Target
STATEWIDE SERVICE POPULATION CALCULATIONS
Population
2020 40,619,346
2030 44,085,600
2035 45,747,645
2040 47,233,240
2050 49,779,362
CALIFORNIA SERVICE POPULATION (ESTIMATE)
Employment
Total
Employment
Farm
Employment
Natural
Resources and
Mining
Employment
Manufacturing
Employment
Employment
w/o Industrial
and
Agricultural
Sectors
2020 17,511,810 417,750 25,690 1330860 15,737,510
2030 19,210,760 420,010 25,790 1370380 17,394,580
2035 20,027,660 421,330 25,980 1388630 18,191,720
2040 20,848,900 422,660 26,180 1407190 18,992,870
2050 22,595,640 425,320 26,590 1445270 20,698,460
Service Population (SP)
Total
Employment
Employment
w/o Industrial
and
Agricultural
Sectors
2020 58,131,156 56,356,856
2030 63,296,360 61,480,180
2035 65,775,305 63,939,365
2040 68,082,140 66,226,110
2050 72,375,002 70,477,822
Project Horizon Year Estimate 2040
2040 population 47,233,240
2040 employment (w/o industrial & Ag) 18,992,870
2040 SP 66,226,110
California Department of Finance. 2014, December. Report P-1 (County): State and County Total Population Projections, 2010-2060 (5 -year increments). http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Projections/ California Department of Transportation. 2016. Long-Term Socio-Economic Forecasts by County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/eab/socio_economic.html GHG Emissions Target Setting - Forecasting the 2030 Efficiency Target 2030 Scoping Plan - Efficiency Metric
Year 2020 Plan-Level
2020 Target (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 431
2020 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 10.6
2020 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 7.6 Year 2020 Project-Level
2020 Target (Project-Level) MMTCO2e 287.0
2020 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 7.1
2020 Per Service Population Target (Project-Level) MTCO2e/sp 5.1 Year 2030 Plan-Level
2030 Target (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 260
2030 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 5.9
2030 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 4.1 Year 2030 Project-Level
Land Use Inventory (Project-Level) MMTCO2e 182.8
2030 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 4.1
2030 Per Service Population Target (Project-Level) MTCO2e/sp 3.0 Year 2050 Plan-Level
2050 Target estimated (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 86
2050 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 1.7
2050 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 1.2 Year 2050 Project-Level
2050 Target estimated (Plan-Level) MMTCO2e 57
2050 Per Capita Target MTCO2e/pc 1.2
2050 Per Service Population Target (Plan-Level) MTCO2e/sp 0.8 Project Horizon Year Estimate 2040
Land Use Inventory (Project-Level) MMTCO2e 120.1 -58%
2035 Per Service Population Target (Project-Level) MTCO2e/sp 1.8
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Strip Mall 1,294.67 1000sqft 138.72 1,294,669.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 403.37 1000sqft 37.04 403,370.00 0 Single Family Housing 4,221.00 Dwelling Unit 823.55 7,597,800.00 12072 Apartments Mid Rise 2,910.00 Dwelling Unit 103.55 2,910,000.00 8323 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 42.63 Acre 42.63 0.00 0
Junior College (2Yr) 308.49 1000sqft 23.61 308,493.00 0 Government Office Building 16.99 1000sqft 1.95 16,988.00 0 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 2,489.07 1000sqft 114.28 2,489,065.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 9:05 PM Construction - Fresno County, Annual
Construction
Fresno County, Annual
tblLandUse LotAcreage 57.14 114.28
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,856,962.80 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 1,294,670.00 1,294,669.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 16,990.00 16,988.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 308,490.00 308,493.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1,294,670.00 1,294,669.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 2,489,070.00 2,489,065.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 308,490.00 308,493.00 tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 1,856,962.80 0.00
tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 2,489,070.00 2,489,065.00 tblLandUse BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 16,990.00 16,988.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 11,000.00 348.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6,000.00 190.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 317.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 15,500.00 491.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 11,000.00 348.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 155,000.00 4,906.00
Fleet Mix -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Based on the Dual Land Use scenario
Construction Phase - Based on CalEEMod default and normalized to an 25-year buildout. Assumes overlap of all phases.
Trips and VMT - Assumes one water truck and 2 trips per water truck.
Grading -
0.0000 9,730.579
6 9,730.579
6 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.080
3 2022 3.2214 24.2950 20.4405 0.1050 6.5842 0.1879 6.7721 1.7799 0.1769 1.9568
0.0000 9,977.311
3 9,977.311
3 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.669
8 2021 3.4894 25.9569 22.2751 0.1077 6.6095 0.2174 6.8269 1.7867 0.2047 1.9914
0.0000 10,223.57
79 10,223.57
79 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.91
53 2020 3.8914 28.7198 24.6331 0.1104 6.6348 0.3100 6.9447 1.7936 0.2929 2.0865
0.0000 11,568.11
96 11,568.11
96 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.20
31 2019 37.7934 39.5163 34.1206 0.1253 9.1216 0.7643 9.8859 2.7715 0.7146 3.4860
0.0000 13,467.25
62 13,467.25
62 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
57 2018 104.9187 53.9225 47.6396 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2Total CO2
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 2.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 29.72 138.72
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2040
tblLandUse LotAcreage 1,370.45 823.55
tblLandUse LotAcreage 9.26 37.04
tblLandUse LotAcreage 7.08 23.61
tblLandUse LotAcreage 76.58 103.55
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.39 1.95
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 13,467.25
62 13,467.25
62 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
57 Maximum 104.9187 53.9225 47.6396 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686
0.0000 6,556.889
2 6,556.889
2 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.640
9 2036 1.1719 13.4138 8.3300 0.0705 5.3182 0.0337 5.3519 1.4377 0.0322 1.4698
0.0000 8,149.276
5 8,149.276
5 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.153
7 2035 1.4564 16.6714 10.3530 0.0877 6.6097 0.0419 6.6516 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
0.0000 8,162.004
3 8,162.004
3 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.974
5 2034 1.5293 16.7724 10.6387 0.0878 6.5844 0.0504 6.6348 1.7800 0.0484 1.8284
0.0000 8,214.426
5 8,214.426
5 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.520
3 2033 1.6071 16.8498 11.0192 0.0884 6.5844 0.0517 6.6360 1.7800 0.0496 1.8295
0.0000 8,340.546
3 8,340.546
3 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.883
1 2032 1.7180 17.0735 11.5324 0.0898 6.6350 0.0535 6.6885 1.7937 0.0513 1.8449
0.0000 8,382.636
4 8,382.636
4 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.076
4 2031 1.8254 17.1194 11.9852 0.0903 6.6097 0.0548 6.6645 1.7868 0.0525 1.8393
0.0000 8,470.734
8 8,470.734
8 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.355
6 2030 1.9530 17.2484 12.5547 0.0912 6.6097 0.0565 6.6661 1.7868 0.0540 1.8408
0.0000 8,532.556
5 8,532.556
5 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.828
8 2029 2.0815 17.9850 13.1478 0.0918 6.6097 0.1078 6.7174 1.7868 0.1011 1.8879
0.0000 8,617.278
8 8,617.278
8 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.716
0 2028 2.1961 18.0793 13.7696 0.0928 6.5843 0.1093 6.6936 1.7799 0.1025 1.8825
0.0000 8,783.700
8 8,783.700
8 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.392
5 2027 2.3219 18.3185 14.5413 0.0946 6.6096 0.1118 6.7214 1.7868 0.1048 1.8916
0.0000 8,937.183
7 8,937.183
7 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.053
3 2026 2.4357 18.5349 15.3735 0.0963 6.6096 0.1134 6.7230 1.7868 0.1063 1.8931
0.0000 9,088.403
4 9,088.403
4 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.443
1 2025 2.5526 18.7583 16.2210 0.0979 6.6096 0.1141 6.7236 1.7868 0.1069 1.8937
0.0000 9,317.122
7 9,317.122
7 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.377
2 2024 2.7133 19.2004 17.4006 0.1005 6.6349 0.1265 6.7614 1.7936 0.1186 1.9122
0.0000 9,444.604
3 9,444.604
3 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.896
2 2023 2.8635 19.4306 18.5175 0.1019 6.5842 0.1377 6.7219 1.7799 0.1292 1.9091
0.0000 6,556.888
8 6,556.888
8 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.640
6 2036 1.1719 13.4138 8.3300 0.0705 5.3182 0.0337 5.3519 1.4377 0.0322 1.4698
0.0000 8,149.276
1 8,149.276
1 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.153
3 2035 1.4564 16.6714 10.3530 0.0877 6.6097 0.0419 6.6516 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
0.0000 8,162.003
9 8,162.003
9 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.974
0 2034 1.5293 16.7724 10.6387 0.0878 6.5844 0.0504 6.6348 1.7800 0.0484 1.8284
0.0000 8,214.426
1 8,214.426
1 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.519
9 2033 1.6071 16.8498 11.0192 0.0884 6.5844 0.0517 6.6360 1.7800 0.0496 1.8295
0.0000 8,340.545
9 8,340.545
9 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.882
7 2032 1.7180 17.0735 11.5324 0.0898 6.6350 0.0535 6.6885 1.7937 0.0513 1.8449
0.0000 8,382.635
9 8,382.635
9 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.076
0 2031 1.8254 17.1194 11.9852 0.0903 6.6097 0.0548 6.6645 1.7868 0.0525 1.8393
0.0000 8,470.734
4 8,470.734
4 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.355
2 2030 1.9530 17.2484 12.5547 0.0912 6.6097 0.0565 6.6661 1.7868 0.0540 1.8408
0.0000 8,532.556
1 8,532.556
1 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.828
5 2029 2.0815 17.9850 13.1478 0.0918 6.6097 0.1078 6.7174 1.7868 0.1011 1.8879
0.0000 8,617.278
4 8,617.278
4 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.715
7 2028 2.1961 18.0793 13.7696 0.0928 6.5843 0.1093 6.6936 1.7799 0.1025 1.8825
0.0000 8,783.700
5 8,783.700
5 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.392
1 2027 2.3219 18.3185 14.5413 0.0946 6.6096 0.1118 6.7214 1.7868 0.1048 1.8916
0.0000 8,937.183
4 8,937.183
4 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.052
9 2026 2.4357 18.5349 15.3735 0.0963 6.6096 0.1134 6.7230 1.7868 0.1063 1.8931
0.0000 9,088.403
1 9,088.403
1 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.442
7 2025 2.5526 18.7583 16.2210 0.0979 6.6096 0.1141 6.7236 1.7868 0.1069 1.8937
0.0000 9,317.122
3 9,317.122
3 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.376
8 2024 2.7133 19.2004 17.4006 0.1005 6.6349 0.1265 6.7614 1.7936 0.1186 1.9122
0.0000 9,444.603
9 9,444.603
9 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.895
8 2023 2.8635 19.4306 18.5175 0.1019 6.5842 0.1377 6.7219 1.7799 0.1292 1.9091
0.0000 9,730.579
3 9,730.579
3 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.080
0 2022 3.2214 24.2950 20.4405 0.1050 6.5842 0.1879 6.7721 1.7799 0.1769 1.9568
0.0000 9,977.311
0 9,977.311
0 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.669
4 2021 3.4894 25.9569 22.2751 0.1077 6.6095 0.2174 6.8268 1.7867 0.2047 1.9914
0.0000 10,223.57
75 10,223.57
75 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.91
49 2020 3.8914 28.7198 24.6331 0.1104 6.6348 0.3100 6.9447 1.7936 0.2929 2.0865
0.0000 11,568.11
82 11,568.11
82 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.20
18 2019 37.7934 39.5163 34.1206 0.1253 9.1216 0.7643 9.8859 2.7715 0.7146 3.4860
0.0000 13,467.25
37 13,467.25
37 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
32 2018 104.9187 53.9224 47.6395 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686 Year tons/yr MT/yr
20 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 7.0096 7.0096
21 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 5.5629 5.5629
18 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 6.8799 6.8799
19 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 6.9555 6.9555
16 10-1-2021 12-31-2021 7.4767 7.4767
17 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 6.8572 6.8572
14 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 7.3299 7.3299
15 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 7.4105 7.4105
12 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 8.2545 8.2545
13 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 7.3141 7.3141
10 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 8.0726 8.0726
11 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 8.1613 8.1613
8 10-1-2019 12-31-2019 10.1141 10.1141
9 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 8.1647 8.1647
6 4-1-2019 6-30-2019 19.3643 19.3643
7 7-1-2019 9-30-2019 10.9084 10.9084
4 10-1-2018 12-31-2018 38.8479 38.8479
5 1-1-2019 3-31-2019 36.7948 36.7948
2 4-1-2018 6-30-2018 40.0052 40.0052
3 7-1-2018 9-30-2018 40.2738 40.2738
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2018 3-31-2018 39.7143 39.7143
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBioCO2Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
0.0000 13,467.25
37 13,467.25
37 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.93
32 Maximum 104.9187 53.9224 47.6395 0.1461 11.5876 1.4540 13.0416 3.9142 1.3544 5.2686 48 10-1-2029 12-31-2029 5.0829 5.0829
46 4-1-2029 6-30-2029 5.0057 5.0057
47 7-1-2029 9-30-2029 5.0607 5.0607
44 10-1-2028 12-31-2028 5.1584 5.1584
45 1-1-2029 3-31-2029 4.9724 4.9724
42 4-1-2028 6-30-2028 5.0793 5.0793
43 7-1-2028 9-30-2028 5.1351 5.1351
40 10-1-2027 12-31-2027 5.2339 5.2339
41 1-1-2028 3-31-2028 5.1024 5.1024
38 4-1-2027 6-30-2027 5.1528 5.1528
39 7-1-2027 9-30-2027 5.2095 5.2095
36 10-1-2026 12-31-2026 5.3202 5.3202
37 1-1-2027 3-31-2027 5.1201 5.1201
34 4-1-2026 6-30-2026 5.2368 5.2368
35 7-1-2026 9-30-2026 5.2944 5.2944
32 10-1-2025 12-31-2025 5.4090 5.4090
33 1-1-2026 3-31-2026 5.2045 5.2045
30 4-1-2025 6-30-2025 5.3236 5.3236
31 7-1-2025 9-30-2025 5.3821 5.3821
28 10-1-2024 12-31-2024 5.5436 5.5436
29 1-1-2025 3-31-2025 5.2914 5.2914
26 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 5.4551 5.4551
27 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 5.5150 5.5150
24 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 5.6865 5.6865
25 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 5.4833 5.4833
22 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 5.5949 5.5949
23 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 5.6564 5.6564
74 4-1-2036 6-30-2036 4.5103 4.5103
75 7-1-2036 9-30-2036 4.5599 4.5599
72 10-1-2035 12-31-2035 4.5783 4.5783
73 1-1-2036 3-31-2036 4.5285 4.5285
70 4-1-2035 6-30-2035 4.5103 4.5103
71 7-1-2035 9-30-2035 4.5599 4.5599
68 10-1-2034 12-31-2034 4.6415 4.6415
69 1-1-2035 3-31-2035 4.4788 4.4788
66 4-1-2034 6-30-2034 4.5729 4.5729
67 7-1-2034 9-30-2034 4.6231 4.6231
64 10-1-2033 12-31-2033 4.6828 4.6828
65 1-1-2034 3-31-2034 4.5406 4.5406
62 4-1-2033 6-30-2033 4.6137 4.6137
63 7-1-2033 9-30-2033 4.6644 4.6644
60 10-1-2032 12-31-2032 4.7338 4.7338
61 1-1-2033 3-31-2033 4.5810 4.5810
58 4-1-2032 6-30-2032 4.6634 4.6634
59 7-1-2032 9-30-2032 4.7147 4.7147
56 10-1-2031 12-31-2031 4.7937 4.7937
57 1-1-2032 3-31-2032 4.6824 4.6824
54 4-1-2031 6-30-2031 4.7217 4.7217
55 7-1-2031 9-30-2031 4.7736 4.7736
52 10-1-2030 12-31-2030 4.8618 4.8618
53 1-1-2031 3-31-2031 4.6894 4.6894
50 4-1-2030 6-30-2030 4.7880 4.7880
51 7-1-2030 9-30-2030 4.8406 4.8406
49 1-1-2030 3-31-2030 4.7561 4.7561
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1227.5
Acres of Paving: 42.63
Residential Indoor: 21,278,295; Residential Outdoor: 7,092,765; Non-Residential Indoor: 6,768,878; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,256,293;
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 348
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 5 348 5 Paving Paving 1/1/2018 5/1/2019 5
491
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/1/2018 10/20/2036 5 4906 3 Grading Grading 1/1/2018 11/18/2019 5
317
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2018 9/21/2018 5 190 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2018 3/19/2019 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
Highest 40.2738 40.2738
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
3.2 Demolition - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 1,018.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 5,090.00 1,502.00 0.00
Grading 8 20.00 2.00 0.00 10.80
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 2.00 0.00
Demolition 6 15.00 2.00 0.00 10.80
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle
Class
Hauling
Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 21.5666 21.5666 1.3800e0030.0174 4.1000e- 0.0000 21.6013 004
0.0178 4.6600e0033.9000e0045.0500e003Total 0.0116 0.0443 0.0759 2.4000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3692 458.3692 0.1263 0.0000 461.5263 003
Off-Road 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3692 458.3692 0.1263 0.0000 461.5263 003
NBioCO2Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.2 Demolition - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 21.5666 21.5666 1.3800e0030.0174 4.1000e- 0.0000 21.6013 004
0.0178 4.6600e0033.9000e0045.0500e003Total 0.0116 0.0443 0.0759 2.4000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3686 458.3686 0.1263 0.0000 461.5258 003
Off-Road 0.4853 5.0011 2.9107 5.0700e- 0.2530 0.2530 0.2355 0.2355 0.0000 458.3686 458.3686 0.1263 0.0000 461.5258 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.5227 4.5227 2.8000e0043.7300e- 0.0000 4.5297
003
7.0000e0053.8100e0031.0000e0037.0000e0051.0700e003Total 2.2400e0038.8800e0030.0144 5.0000e005
0.0000 2.9994 2.9994 9.0000e0053.3600e- 0.0000 3.0016
003
2.0000e0053.3800e0038.9000e0042.0000e0059.1000e004Worker 1.9800e0031.3100e0030.0131 3.0000e005
0.0000 1.5233 1.5233 1.9000e0043.7000e- 0.0000 1.5282
004
5.0000e0054.3000e0041.1000e0045.0000e0051.6000e004Vendor 2.6000e0047.5700e0031.2900e0032.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9537 96.9537 0.0270 0.0000 97.6280 003
Off-Road 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9537 96.9537 0.0270 0.0000 97.6280 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.7163 0.0000 1.7163 0.9434 0.0000 0.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.3 Site Preparation - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.5227 4.5227 2.8000e0043.7300e- 0.0000 4.5297
003
7.0000e0053.8100e0031.0000e0037.0000e0051.0700e003Total 2.2400e0038.8800e0030.0144 5.0000e005
0.0000 2.9994 2.9994 9.0000e0053.3600e- 0.0000 3.0016
003
2.0000e0053.3800e0038.9000e0042.0000e0059.1000e004Worker 1.9800e0031.3100e0030.0131 3.0000e005
0.0000 1.5233 1.5233 1.9000e0043.7000e- 0.0000 1.5282
004
5.0000e0054.3000e0041.1000e0045.0000e0051.6000e004Vendor 2.6000e0047.5700e0031.2900e0032.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9536 96.9536 0.0270 0.0000 97.6279 003
Off-Road 0.0984 1.0019 0.6177 1.0900e- 0.0503 0.0503 0.0468 0.0468 0.0000 96.9536 96.9536 0.0270 0.0000 97.6279 003
Off-Road 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 0.2448 0.2448 0.2252 0.2252 0.0000 330.2187 330.2187 0.1028 0.0000 332.7888 003
Fugitive Dust 1.7163 0.0000 1.7163 0.9434 0.0000 0.9434 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 17.7971 17.7971 1.0800e0030.0149 3.1000e- 0.0000 17.8241 004
0.0152 3.9900e0033.0000e0044.2900e003Total 9.9300e0030.0332 0.0654 1.9000e004
0.0000 12.5837 12.5837 4.1000e0040.0137 9.0000e- 0.0000 12.5941 005
0.0138 3.6300e0039.0000e0053.7200e003Worker 8.9500e0036.0900e0030.0604 1.4000e004
0.0000 5.2134 5.2134 6.7000e0041.2600e- 0.0000 5.2301
003
2.2000e0041.4800e0033.6000e0042.1000e0045.7000e004Vendor 9.8000e0040.0272 4.9100e0035.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 1.7163 0.2448 1.9611 0.9434 0.2252 1.1686 0.0000 330.2191 330.2191 0.1028 0.0000 332.7892 003
Off-Road 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 0.2448 0.2448 0.2252 0.2252 0.0000 330.2191 330.2191 0.1028 0.0000 332.7892 003
Total 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 2.1293 0.3437 2.4730 0.8829 0.3162 1.1992 0.0000 739.2630 739.2630 0.2301 0.0000 745.0165 003
Off-Road 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 0.3437 0.3437 0.3162 0.3162 0.0000 739.2630 739.2630 0.2301 0.0000 745.0165 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.4 Grading - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 17.7971 17.7971 1.0800e0030.0149 3.1000e- 0.0000 17.8241 004
0.0152 3.9900e0033.0000e0044.2900e003Total 9.9300e0030.0332 0.0654 1.9000e004
0.0000 12.5837 12.5837 4.1000e0040.0137 9.0000e- 0.0000 12.5941 005
0.0138 3.6300e0039.0000e0053.7200e003Worker 8.9500e0036.0900e0030.0604 1.4000e004
0.0000 5.2134 5.2134 6.7000e0041.2600e- 0.0000 5.2301
003
2.2000e0041.4800e0033.6000e0042.1000e0045.7000e004Vendor 9.8000e0040.0272 4.9100e0035.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.4335 4.5789 2.1353 3.6100e- 1.7163 0.2448 1.9611 0.9434 0.2252 1.1686 0.0000 330.2187 330.2187 0.1028 0.0000 332.7888 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 2.1293 0.3437 2.4730 0.8829 0.3162 1.1992 0.0000 739.2621 739.2621 0.2301 0.0000 745.0156 003
Off-Road 0.6643 7.7676 4.5792 8.1000e- 0.3437 0.3437 0.3162 0.3162 0.0000 739.2621 739.2621 0.2301 0.0000 745.0156 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 26.3683 26.3683 1.5400e0030.0226 4.4000e- 0.0000 26.4069 004
0.0230 6.0500e0034.2000e0046.4700e003Total 0.0150 0.0466 0.0990 2.9000e004
0.0000 19.2067 19.2067 6.3000e0040.0209 1.4000e- 0.0000 19.2225 004
0.0210 5.5500e0031.3000e0045.6800e003Worker 0.0137 9.3000e0030.0923 2.1000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 2.1293 0.2740 2.4033 0.8829 0.2521 1.1350 0.0000 640.5652 640.5652 0.2027 0.0000 645.6319 003
Off-Road 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 0.2740 0.2740 0.2521 0.2521 0.0000 640.5652 640.5652 0.2027 0.0000 645.6319 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.4 Grading - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 26.3683 26.3683 1.5400e0030.0226 4.4000e- 0.0000 26.4069 004
0.0230 6.0500e0034.2000e0046.4700e003Total 0.0150 0.0466 0.0990 2.9000e004
0.0000 19.2067 19.2067 6.3000e0040.0209 1.4000e- 0.0000 19.2225 004
0.0210 5.5500e0031.3000e0045.6800e003Worker 0.0137 9.3000e0030.0923 2.1000e004
0.0000 7.1616 7.1616 9.1000e0041.7300e- 0.0000 7.1844
003
3.0000e0042.0300e0035.0000e0042.9000e0047.9000e004Vendor 1.3500e0030.0373 6.7500e0038.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 2.1293 0.2740 2.4033 0.8829 0.2521 1.1350 0.0000 640.5644 640.5644 0.2027 0.0000 645.6311 003
Off-Road 0.5450 6.2698 3.8383 7.1300e- 0.2740 0.2740 0.2521 0.2521 0.0000 640.5644 640.5644 0.2027 0.0000 645.6311 003
Fugitive Dust 2.1293 0.0000 2.1293 0.8829 0.0000 0.8829 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 22.6815 22.6815 1.2800e0030.0199 3.5000e- 0.0000 22.7136 004
0.0203 5.3300e0033.3000e0045.6600e003Total 0.0119 0.0382 0.0770 2.5000e004
0.0000 16.4250 16.4250 4.9000e0040.0184 1.2000e- 0.0000 16.4373 004
0.0185 4.8900e0031.1000e0045.0000e003Worker 0.0109 7.1500e0030.0717 1.8000e004
0.0000 6.2565 6.2565 7.9000e0041.5200e- 0.0000 6.2764
003
2.3000e0041.7500e0034.4000e0042.2000e0046.6000e004Vendor 1.0600e0030.0311 5.3000e0037.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3497 3.0524 2.2943 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2862 310.2862 0.0760 0.0000 312.1867 003
Off-Road 0.3497 3.0524 2.2943 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2862 310.2862 0.0760 0.0000 312.1867 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 22.6815 22.6815 1.2800e0030.0199 3.5000e- 0.0000 22.7136 004
0.0203 5.3300e0033.3000e0045.6600e003Total 0.0119 0.0382 0.0770 2.5000e004
0.0000 16.4250 16.4250 4.9000e0040.0184 1.2000e- 0.0000 16.4373 004
0.0185 4.8900e0031.1000e0045.0000e003Worker 0.0109 7.1500e0030.0717 1.8000e004
0.0000 6.2565 6.2565 7.9000e0041.5200e- 0.0000 6.2764
003
2.3000e0041.7500e0034.4000e0042.2000e0046.6000e004Vendor 1.0600e0030.0311 5.3000e0037.0000e005 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3497 3.0524 2.2942 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2859 310.2859 0.0760 0.0000 312.1864 003
Off-Road 0.3497 3.0524 2.2942 3.5100e- 0.1957 0.1957 0.1840 0.1840 0.0000 310.2859 310.2859 0.0760 0.0000 312.1864 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,266.44
96 10,266.44
96 0.8475 0.0000 10,287.63
78 Total 4.4913 30.3701 28.5425 0.1108 6.6094 0.2638 6.8731 1.7867 0.2511 2.0378
0.0000 4,888.102
0 4,888.102
0 0.1610 0.0000 4,892.126
8 Worker 3.4774 2.3657 23.4768 0.0542 5.3105 0.0363 5.3467 1.4115 0.0334 1.4449
0.0000 5,378.347
6 5,378.347
6 0.6865 0.0000 5,395.511
0 Vendor 1.0139 28.0044 5.0658 0.0566 1.2989 0.2275 1.5264 0.3752 0.2176 0.5929 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 5,331.932
3 5,331.932
3 0.6774 0.0000 5,348.868
3 Vendor 0.9024 26.4989 4.5174 0.0561 1.2990 0.1922 1.4912 0.3752 0.1839 0.5591 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8110 306.8110 0.0747 0.0000 308.6795 003
Off-Road 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8110 306.8110 0.0747 0.0000 308.6795 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,266.44
96 10,266.44
96 0.8475 0.0000 10,287.63
78 Total 4.4913 30.3701 28.5425 0.1108 6.6094 0.2638 6.8731 1.7867 0.2511 2.0378
0.0000 4,888.102
0 4,888.102
0 0.1610 0.0000 4,892.126
8 Worker 3.4774 2.3657 23.4768 0.0542 5.3105 0.0363 5.3467 1.4115 0.0334 1.4449
0.0000 5,378.347
6 5,378.347
6 0.6865 0.0000 5,395.511
0 Vendor 1.0139 28.0044 5.0658 0.0566 1.2989 0.2275 1.5264 0.3752 0.2176 0.5929
0.0000 4,743.581
0 4,743.581
0 0.1413 0.0000 4,747.113
0 Worker 3.1385 2.0651 20.6977 0.0525 5.3105 0.0352 5.3456 1.4115 0.0324 1.4439
0.0000 5,331.932
3 5,331.932
3 0.6774 0.0000 5,348.868
3 Vendor 0.9024 26.4989 4.5174 0.0561 1.2990 0.1922 1.4912 0.3752 0.1839 0.5591 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8106 306.8106 0.0747 0.0000 308.6792 003
Off-Road 0.3081 2.7508 2.2399 3.5100e- 0.1683 0.1683 0.1583 0.1583 0.0000 306.8106 306.8106 0.0747 0.0000 308.6792 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,075.51
33 10,075.51
33 0.8187 0.0000 10,095.98
13 Total 4.0409 28.5640 25.2151 0.1086 6.6094 0.2274 6.8368 1.7867 0.2163 2.0030
0.0000 4,743.581
0 4,743.581
0 0.1413 0.0000 4,747.113
0 Worker 3.1385 2.0651 20.6977 0.0525 5.3105 0.0352 5.3456 1.4115 0.0324 1.4439
0.0000 9,920.168
8 9,920.168
8 0.7795 0.0000 9,939.655
7 Total 3.6137 26.2064 22.4259 0.1069 6.6348 0.1636 6.7984 1.7936 0.1553 1.9489
0.0000 4,613.778
0 4,613.778
0 0.1236 0.0000 4,616.868
6 Worker 2.8784 1.8257 18.5327 0.0511 5.3308 0.0343 5.3651 1.4169 0.0316 1.4485
0.0000 5,306.390
8 5,306.390
8 0.6559 0.0000 5,322.787
1 Vendor 0.7353 24.3807 3.8933 0.0558 1.3040 0.1294 1.4333 0.3767 0.1237 0.5004 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4091 303.4091 0.0740 0.0000 305.2596 003
Off-Road 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4091 303.4091 0.0740 0.0000 305.2596 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 10,075.51
33 10,075.51
33 0.8187 0.0000 10,095.98
13 Total 4.0409 28.5640 25.2151 0.1086 6.6094 0.2274 6.8368 1.7867 0.2163 2.0030
3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 9,920.168
8 9,920.168
8 0.7795 0.0000 9,939.655
7 Total 3.6137 26.2064 22.4259 0.1069 6.6348 0.1636 6.7984 1.7936 0.1553 1.9489
0.0000 4,613.778
0 4,613.778
0 0.1236 0.0000 4,616.868
6 Worker 2.8784 1.8257 18.5327 0.0511 5.3308 0.0343 5.3651 1.4169 0.0316 1.4485
0.0000 5,306.390
8 5,306.390
8 0.6559 0.0000 5,322.787
1 Vendor 0.7353 24.3807 3.8933 0.0558 1.3040 0.1294 1.4333 0.3767 0.1237 0.5004 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4087 303.4087 0.0740 0.0000 305.2592 003
Off-Road 0.2777 2.5134 2.2072 3.5300e- 0.1463 0.1463 0.1376 0.1376 0.0000 303.4087 303.4087 0.0740 0.0000 305.2592 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 9,675.024
7 9,675.024
7 0.7414 0.0000 9,693.559
9 Total 3.2414 23.6820 20.1121 0.1042 6.6095 0.0923 6.7017 1.7867 0.0871 1.8738
0.0000 4,438.665
1 4,438.665
1 0.1096 0.0000 4,441.405
0 Worker 2.6491 1.6182 16.7506 0.0491 5.3105 0.0331 5.3435 1.4115 0.0304 1.4419
0.0000 5,236.359
6 5,236.359
6 0.6318 0.0000 5,252.155
0 Vendor 0.5922 22.0638 3.3615 0.0551 1.2990 0.0592 1.3582 0.3753 0.0567 0.4319 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2867 302.2867 0.0729 0.0000 304.1099 003
Off-Road 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2867 302.2867 0.0729 0.0000 304.1099 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,675.024
7 9,675.024
7 0.7414 0.0000 9,693.559
9 Total 3.2414 23.6820 20.1121 0.1042 6.6095 0.0923 6.7017 1.7867 0.0871 1.8738
0.0000 4,438.665
1 4,438.665
1 0.1096 0.0000 4,441.405
0 Worker 2.6491 1.6182 16.7506 0.0491 5.3105 0.0331 5.3435 1.4115 0.0304 1.4419
0.0000 5,236.359
6 5,236.359
6 0.6318 0.0000 5,252.155
0 Vendor 0.5922 22.0638 3.3615 0.0551 1.2990 0.0592 1.3582 0.3753 0.0567 0.4319 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2863 302.2863 0.0729 0.0000 304.1095 003
Off-Road 0.2481 2.2749 2.1631 3.5100e- 0.1251 0.1251 0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 302.2863 302.2863 0.0729 0.0000 304.1095 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,429.336
8 9,429.336
8 0.7079 0.0000 9,447.033
3 Total 2.9996 22.2650 18.3132 0.1015 6.5842 0.0827 6.6669 1.7799 0.0780 1.8579
0.0000 4,262.834
5 4,262.834
5 0.0974 0.0000 4,265.269
0 Worker 2.4506 1.4391 15.2126 0.0472 5.2901 0.0320 5.3221 1.4061 0.0294 1.4355
0.0000 5,166.502
3 5,166.502
3 0.6105 0.0000 5,181.764
3 Vendor 0.5490 20.8258 3.1006 0.0543 1.2941 0.0507 1.3448 0.3738 0.0485 0.4224 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2428 301.2428 0.0722 0.0000 303.0471 003
Off-Road 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2428 301.2428 0.0722 0.0000 303.0471 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3462 301.3462 0.0717 0.0000 303.1383 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,429.336
8 9,429.336
8 0.7079 0.0000 9,447.033
3 Total 2.9996 22.2650 18.3132 0.1015 6.5842 0.0827 6.6669 1.7799 0.0780 1.8579
0.0000 4,262.834
5 4,262.834
5 0.0974 0.0000 4,265.269
0 Worker 2.4506 1.4391 15.2126 0.0472 5.2901 0.0320 5.3221 1.4061 0.0294 1.4355
0.0000 5,166.502
3 5,166.502
3 0.6105 0.0000 5,181.764
3 Vendor 0.5490 20.8258 3.1006 0.0543 1.2941 0.0507 1.3448 0.3738 0.0485 0.4224 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2425 301.2425 0.0722 0.0000 303.0467 003
Off-Road 0.2218 2.0300 2.1272 3.5000e- 0.1052 0.1052 0.0990 0.0990 0.0000 301.2425 301.2425 0.0722 0.0000 303.0467 003
Total 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3458 301.3458 0.0717 0.0000 303.1380 003
Off-Road 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3458 301.3458 0.0717 0.0000 303.1380 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,143.258
1 9,143.258
1 0.5000 0.0000 9,155.757
9 Total 2.6591 17.5606 16.4058 0.0984 6.5842 0.0467 6.6309 1.7799 0.0436 1.8235
0.0000 4,102.984
4 4,102.984
4 0.0869 0.0000 4,105.156
4 Worker 2.2828 1.2879 13.8891 0.0454 5.2901 0.0312 5.3213 1.4061 0.0287 1.4347
0.0000 5,040.273
7 5,040.273
7 0.4131 0.0000 5,050.601
5 Vendor 0.3763 16.2727 2.5167 0.0530 1.2941 0.0156 1.3097 0.3738 0.0149 0.3888 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e- 0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3462 301.3462 0.0717 0.0000 303.1383 003
Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 003
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,143.258
1 9,143.258
1 0.5000 0.0000 9,155.757
9 Total 2.6591 17.5606 16.4058 0.0984 6.5842 0.0467 6.6309 1.7799 0.0436 1.8235
0.0000 4,102.984
4 4,102.984
4 0.0869 0.0000 4,105.156
4 Worker 2.2828 1.2879 13.8891 0.0454 5.2901 0.0312 5.3213 1.4061 0.0287 1.4347
0.0000 5,040.273
7 5,040.273
7 0.4131 0.0000 5,050.601
5 Vendor 0.3763 16.2727 2.5167 0.0530 1.2941 0.0156 1.3097 0.3738 0.0149 0.3888 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 003
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e- 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,013.400
4 9,013.400
4 0.4984 0.0000 9,025.859
3 Total 2.5205 17.4393 15.2827 0.0969 6.6349 0.0462 6.6810 1.7936 0.0431 1.8367
0.0000 3,973.020
5 3,973.020
5 0.0784 0.0000 3,974.979
5 Worker 2.1515 1.1661 12.8707 0.0439 5.3308 0.0306 5.3614 1.4169 0.0282 1.4451
0.0000 5,040.379
9 5,040.379
9 0.4200 0.0000 5,050.879
8 Vendor 0.3691 16.2732 2.4120 0.0530 1.3041 0.0156 1.3196 0.3767 0.0149 0.3916 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 9,013.400
4 9,013.400
4 0.4984 0.0000 9,025.859
3 Total 2.5205 17.4393 15.2827 0.0969 6.6349 0.0462 6.6810 1.7936 0.0431 1.8367
0.0000 3,973.020
5 3,973.020
5 0.0784 0.0000 3,974.979
5 Worker 2.1515 1.1661 12.8707 0.0439 5.3308 0.0306 5.3614 1.4169 0.0282 1.4451
0.0000 5,040.379
9 5,040.379
9 0.4200 0.0000 5,050.879
8 Vendor 0.3691 16.2732 2.4120 0.0530 1.3041 0.0156 1.3196 0.3767 0.0149 0.3916 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,785.748
5 8,785.748
5 0.4904 0.0000 8,798.009
6 Total 2.3742 17.1311 14.1220 0.0944 6.6096 0.0452 6.6548 1.7868 0.0422 1.8289
0.0000 3,800.343
9 3,800.343
9 0.0703 0.0000 3,802.101
3 Worker 2.0149 1.0494 11.8137 0.0420 5.3105 0.0299 5.3404 1.4115 0.0275 1.4390
0.0000 4,985.404
6 4,985.404
6 0.4201 0.0000 4,995.908
2 Vendor 0.3593 16.0816 2.3082 0.0524 1.2991 0.0153 1.3144 0.3753 0.0147 0.3899 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2026
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,785.748
5 8,785.748
5 0.4904 0.0000 8,798.009
6 Total 2.3742 17.1311 14.1220 0.0944 6.6096 0.0452 6.6548 1.7868 0.0422 1.8289
0.0000 3,800.343
9 3,800.343
9 0.0703 0.0000 3,802.101
3 Worker 2.0149 1.0494 11.8137 0.0420 5.3105 0.0299 5.3404 1.4115 0.0275 1.4390
0.0000 4,985.404
6 4,985.404
6 0.4201 0.0000 4,995.908
2 Vendor 0.3593 16.0816 2.3082 0.0524 1.2991 0.0153 1.3144 0.3753 0.0147 0.3899 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,634.528
9 8,634.528
9 0.4836 0.0000 8,646.619
8 Total 2.2573 16.9076 13.2744 0.0928 6.6096 0.0445 6.6541 1.7868 0.0415 1.8283
0.0000 3,681.273
2 3,681.273
2 0.0645 0.0000 3,682.885
2 Worker 1.9053 0.9571 11.0428 0.0407 5.3105 0.0294 5.3399 1.4115 0.0271 1.4385
0.0000 4,953.255
6 4,953.255
6 0.4192 0.0000 4,963.734
5 Vendor 0.3520 15.9506 2.2317 0.0521 1.2991 0.0151 1.3143 0.3753 0.0145 0.3898 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 4,925.320
9 4,925.320
9 0.4180 0.0000 4,935.770
7 Vendor 0.3459 15.8184 2.1706 0.0518 1.2992 0.0149 1.3141 0.3753 0.0143 0.3896 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2027
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,634.528
9 8,634.528
9 0.4836 0.0000 8,646.619
8 Total 2.2573 16.9076 13.2744 0.0928 6.6096 0.0445 6.6541 1.7868 0.0415 1.8283
0.0000 3,681.273
2 3,681.273
2 0.0645 0.0000 3,682.885
2 Worker 1.9053 0.9571 11.0428 0.0407 5.3105 0.0294 5.3399 1.4115 0.0271 1.4385
0.0000 4,953.255
6 4,953.255
6 0.4192 0.0000 4,963.734
5 Vendor 0.3520 15.9506 2.2317 0.0521 1.2991 0.0151 1.3143 0.3753 0.0145 0.3898
0.0000 3,555.725
0 3,555.725
0 0.0585 0.0000 3,557.188
3 Worker 1.7976 0.8729 10.2717 0.0393 5.3105 0.0280 5.3384 1.4115 0.0258 1.4372
0.0000 4,925.320
9 4,925.320
9 0.4180 0.0000 4,935.770
7 Vendor 0.3459 15.8184 2.1706 0.0518 1.2992 0.0149 1.3141 0.3753 0.0143 0.3896 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,481.045
9 8,481.045
9 0.4765 0.0000 8,492.959
0 Total 2.1435 16.6912 12.4423 0.0911 6.6096 0.0429 6.6525 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
0.0000 3,555.725
0 3,555.725
0 0.0585 0.0000 3,557.188
3 Worker 1.7976 0.8729 10.2717 0.0393 5.3105 0.0280 5.3384 1.4115 0.0258 1.4372
0.0000 8,315.783
5 8,315.783
5 0.4666 0.0000 8,327.448
9 Total 2.0184 16.4582 11.6786 0.0893 6.5843 0.0407 6.6250 1.7799 0.0380 1.8179
0.0000 3,431.334
3 3,431.334
3 0.0532 0.0000 3,432.665
0 Worker 1.6786 0.7949 9.5627 0.0379 5.2901 0.0260 5.3161 1.4061 0.0239 1.4300
0.0000 4,884.449
2 4,884.449
2 0.4134 0.0000 4,894.783
9 Vendor 0.3398 15.6633 2.1158 0.0514 1.2942 0.0147 1.3089 0.3739 0.0141 0.3880 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 003
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2028
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,481.045
9 8,481.045
9 0.4765 0.0000 8,492.959
0 Total 2.1435 16.6912 12.4423 0.0911 6.6096 0.0429 6.6525 1.7868 0.0400 1.8268
3.5 Building Construction - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 8,315.783
5 8,315.783
5 0.4666 0.0000 8,327.448
9 Total 2.0184 16.4582 11.6786 0.0893 6.5843 0.0407 6.6250 1.7799 0.0380 1.8179
0.0000 3,431.334
3 3,431.334
3 0.0532 0.0000 3,432.665
0 Worker 1.6786 0.7949 9.5627 0.0379 5.2901 0.0260 5.3161 1.4061 0.0239 1.4300
0.0000 4,884.449
2 4,884.449
2 0.4134 0.0000 4,894.783
9 Vendor 0.3398 15.6633 2.1158 0.0514 1.2942 0.0147 1.3089 0.3739 0.0141 0.3880 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 003
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e- 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 8,229.901
6 8,229.901
6 0.4598 0.0000 8,241.395
3 Total 1.9030 16.3577 11.0487 0.0883 6.6097 0.0389 6.6486 1.7868 0.0364 1.8232
0.0000 3,346.140
3 3,346.140
3 0.0487 0.0000 3,347.357
3 Worker 1.5664 0.7296 8.9666 0.0370 5.3105 0.0243 5.3348 1.4115 0.0224 1.4339
0.0000 4,883.761
3 4,883.761
3 0.4111 0.0000 4,894.038
0 Vendor 0.3366 15.6281 2.0821 0.0514 1.2992 0.0146 1.3138 0.3753 0.0140 0.3893 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2030
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,229.901
6 8,229.901
6 0.4598 0.0000 8,241.395
3 Total 1.9030 16.3577 11.0487 0.0883 6.6097 0.0389 6.6486 1.7868 0.0364 1.8232
0.0000 3,346.140
3 3,346.140
3 0.0487 0.0000 3,347.357
3 Worker 1.5664 0.7296 8.9666 0.0370 5.3105 0.0243 5.3348 1.4115 0.0224 1.4339
0.0000 4,883.761
3 4,883.761
3 0.4111 0.0000 4,894.038
0 Vendor 0.3366 15.6281 2.0821 0.0514 1.2992 0.0146 1.3138 0.3753 0.0140 0.3893 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e- 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,127.701
2 8,127.701
2 0.4511 0.0000 8,138.977
9 Total 1.7822 16.2129 10.4462 0.0872 6.6097 0.0371 6.6468 1.7868 0.0347 1.8215
0.0000 3,259.261
4 3,259.261
4 0.0444 0.0000 3,260.372
5 Worker 1.4491 0.6676 8.3963 0.0360 5.3105 0.0227 5.3331 1.4115 0.0209 1.4323
0.0000 4,868.439
8 4,868.439
8 0.4066 0.0000 4,878.605
4 Vendor 0.3331 15.5453 2.0499 0.0512 1.2992 0.0145 1.3137 0.3753 0.0138 0.3892 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2031
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,127.701
2 8,127.701
2 0.4511 0.0000 8,138.977
9 Total 1.7822 16.2129 10.4462 0.0872 6.6097 0.0371 6.6468 1.7868 0.0347 1.8215
0.0000 3,259.261
4 3,259.261
4 0.0444 0.0000 3,260.372
5 Worker 1.4491 0.6676 8.3963 0.0360 5.3105 0.0227 5.3331 1.4115 0.0209 1.4323
0.0000 4,868.439
8 4,868.439
8 0.4066 0.0000 4,878.605
4 Vendor 0.3331 15.5453 2.0499 0.0512 1.2992 0.0145 1.3137 0.3753 0.0138 0.3892 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Off-Road 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0138 0.0000 343.3773 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,039.602
7 8,039.602
7 0.4438 0.0000 8,050.698
7 Total 1.6546 16.0839 9.8767 0.0862 6.6097 0.0355 6.6451 1.7868 0.0332 1.8200
0.0000 3,182.833
8 3,182.833
8 0.0405 0.0000 3,183.845
8 Worker 1.3242 0.6091 7.8513 0.0351 5.3105 0.0211 5.3316 1.4115 0.0195 1.4309
0.0000 4,856.769
0 4,856.769
0 0.4034 0.0000 4,866.852
9 Vendor 0.3304 15.4748 2.0254 0.0511 1.2992 0.0143 1.3136 0.3753 0.0137 0.3890 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1708 1.0355 2.1085 4.0400e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0138 0.0000 343.3777 003
Total 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3479 344.3479 0.0138 0.0000 344.6933 003
Off-Road 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3479 344.3479 0.0138 0.0000 344.6933 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2032
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 8,039.602
7 8,039.602
7 0.4438 0.0000 8,050.698
7 Total 1.6546 16.0839 9.8767 0.0862 6.6097 0.0355 6.6451 1.7868 0.0332 1.8200
0.0000 3,182.833
8 3,182.833
8 0.0405 0.0000 3,183.845
8 Worker 1.3242 0.6091 7.8513 0.0351 5.3105 0.0211 5.3316 1.4115 0.0195 1.4309
0.0000 4,856.769
0 4,856.769
0 0.4034 0.0000 4,866.852
9 Vendor 0.3304 15.4748 2.0254 0.0511 1.2992 0.0143 1.3136 0.3753 0.0137 0.3890 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3475 344.3475 0.0138 0.0000 344.6929 003
Off-Road 0.1715 1.0394 2.1166 4.0600e- 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0194 0.0000 344.3475 344.3475 0.0138 0.0000 344.6929 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,996.198
3 7,996.198
3 0.4397 0.0000 8,007.189
8 Total 1.5465 16.0341 9.4158 0.0857 6.6350 0.0341 6.6691 1.7937 0.0318 1.8255
0.0000 3,128.019
5 3,128.019
5 0.0372 0.0000 3,128.949
2 Worker 1.2170 0.5609 7.4013 0.0345 5.3308 0.0198 5.3506 1.4169 0.0182 1.4351
0.0000 4,868.178
9 4,868.178
9 0.4025 0.0000 4,878.240
6 Vendor 0.3295 15.4731 2.0145 0.0512 1.3042 0.0143 1.3185 0.3768 0.0136 0.3904 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2033
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,996.198
3 7,996.198
3 0.4397 0.0000 8,007.189
8 Total 1.5465 16.0341 9.4158 0.0857 6.6350 0.0341 6.6691 1.7937 0.0318 1.8255
0.0000 3,128.019
5 3,128.019
5 0.0372 0.0000 3,128.949
2 Worker 1.2170 0.5609 7.4013 0.0345 5.3308 0.0198 5.3506 1.4169 0.0182 1.4351
0.0000 4,868.178
9 4,868.178
9 0.4025 0.0000 4,878.240
6 Vendor 0.3295 15.4731 2.0145 0.0512 1.3042 0.0143 1.3185 0.3768 0.0136 0.3904 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,872.707
2 7,872.707
2 0.4301 0.0000 7,883.458
3 Total 1.4369 15.8183 8.9187 0.0844 6.5844 0.0324 6.6168 1.7800 0.0303 1.8103
0.0000 3,046.421
1 3,046.421
1 0.0340 0.0000 3,047.270
3 Worker 1.1115 0.5142 6.9333 0.0336 5.2901 0.0184 5.3085 1.4061 0.0169 1.4229
0.0000 4,826.286
1 4,826.286
1 0.3961 0.0000 4,836.188
0 Vendor 0.3255 15.3041 1.9855 0.0508 1.2943 0.0140 1.3083 0.3739 0.0134 0.3873 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7193 341.7193 0.0137 0.0000 342.0621 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2034
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,872.707
2 7,872.707
2 0.4301 0.0000 7,883.458
3 Total 1.4369 15.8183 8.9187 0.0844 6.5844 0.0324 6.6168 1.7800 0.0303 1.8103
0.0000 3,046.421
1 3,046.421
1 0.0340 0.0000 3,047.270
3 Worker 1.1115 0.5142 6.9333 0.0336 5.2901 0.0184 5.3085 1.4061 0.0169 1.4229
0.0000 4,826.286
1 4,826.286
1 0.3961 0.0000 4,836.188
0 Vendor 0.3255 15.3041 1.9855 0.0508 1.2943 0.0140 1.3083 0.3739 0.0134 0.3873 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Off-Road 0.1702 1.0315 2.1004 4.0200e- 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 341.7189 341.7189 0.0137 0.0000 342.0617 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,820.285
0 7,820.285
0 0.4251 0.0000 7,830.912
4 Total 1.3591 15.7409 8.5383 0.0838 6.5844 0.0311 6.6155 1.7800 0.0291 1.8091
0.0000 2,996.592
0 2,996.592
0 0.0314 0.0000 2,997.376
9 Worker 1.0349 0.4806 6.5649 0.0331 5.2901 0.0172 5.3073 1.4061 0.0158 1.4218
0.0000 4,823.692
9 4,823.692
9 0.3937 0.0000 4,833.535
5 Vendor 0.3242 15.2604 1.9733 0.0507 1.2943 0.0140 1.3082 0.3739 0.0133 0.3873 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 4,840.776
0 4,840.776
0 0.3930 0.0000 4,850.599
7 Vendor 0.3243 15.2805 1.9708 0.0509 1.2993 0.0139 1.3132 0.3754 0.0133 0.3887 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0128 0.0000 343.3530 003
Off-Road 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0336 343.0336 0.0128 0.0000 343.3530 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2035
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,820.285
0 7,820.285
0 0.4251 0.0000 7,830.912
4 Total 1.3591 15.7409 8.5383 0.0838 6.5844 0.0311 6.6155 1.7800 0.0291 1.8091
0.0000 2,996.592
0 2,996.592
0 0.0314 0.0000 2,997.376
9 Worker 1.0349 0.4806 6.5649 0.0331 5.2901 0.0172 5.3073 1.4061 0.0158 1.4218
0.0000 4,823.692
9 4,823.692
9 0.3937 0.0000 4,833.535
5 Vendor 0.3242 15.2604 1.9733 0.0507 1.2943 0.0140 1.3082 0.3739 0.0133 0.3873
0.0000 2,965.466
9 2,965.466
9 0.0294 0.0000 2,966.201
0 Worker 0.9734 0.4564 6.2788 0.0327 5.3105 0.0162 5.3266 1.4115 0.0149 1.4263
0.0000 4,840.776
0 4,840.776
0 0.3930 0.0000 4,850.599
7 Vendor 0.3243 15.2805 1.9708 0.0509 1.2993 0.0139 1.3132 0.3754 0.0133 0.3887 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0128 0.0000 343.3526 003
Off-Road 0.1588 0.9346 2.1034 4.0400e- 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 343.0332 343.0332 0.0128 0.0000 343.3526 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,806.242
9 7,806.242
9 0.4223 0.0000 7,816.800
7 Total 1.2977 15.7368 8.2496 0.0836 6.6097 0.0301 6.6398 1.7868 0.0282 1.8150
0.0000 2,965.466
9 2,965.466
9 0.0294 0.0000 2,966.201
0 Worker 0.9734 0.4564 6.2788 0.0327 5.3105 0.0162 5.3266 1.4115 0.0149 1.4263
0.0000 6,280.885
1 6,280.885
1 0.3398 0.0000 6,289.379
9 Total 1.0441 12.6618 6.6376 0.0673 5.3182 0.0242 5.3424 1.4377 0.0227 1.4603
0.0000 2,386.007
9 2,386.007
9 0.0236 0.0000 2,386.598
5 Worker 0.7832 0.3672 5.0519 0.0263 4.2728 0.0130 4.2858 1.1357 0.0120 1.1476
0.0000 3,894.877
2 3,894.877
2 0.3162 0.0000 3,902.781
4 Vendor 0.2609 12.2947 1.5857 0.0410 1.0454 0.0112 1.0566 0.3020 0.0107 0.3127 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0041 276.0041 0.0103 0.0000 276.2611 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Total 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0041 276.0041 0.0103 0.0000 276.2611 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Off-Road 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2036
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7,806.242
9 7,806.242
9 0.4223 0.0000 7,816.800
7 Total 1.2977 15.7368 8.2496 0.0836 6.6097 0.0301 6.6398 1.7868 0.0282 1.8150
3.6 Paving - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 6,280.885
1 6,280.885
1 0.3398 0.0000 6,289.379
9 Total 1.0441 12.6618 6.6376 0.0673 5.3182 0.0242 5.3424 1.4377 0.0227 1.4603
0.0000 2,386.007
9 2,386.007
9 0.0236 0.0000 2,386.598
5 Worker 0.7832 0.3672 5.0519 0.0263 4.2728 0.0130 4.2858 1.1357 0.0120 1.1476
0.0000 3,894.877
2 3,894.877
2 0.3162 0.0000 3,902.781
4 Vendor 0.2609 12.2947 1.5857 0.0410 1.0454 0.0112 1.0566 0.3020 0.0107 0.3127 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0037 276.0037 0.0103 0.0000 276.2607 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Total 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003
9.4900e- 0.0000 276.0037 276.0037 0.0103 0.0000 276.2607 003
9.4900e0039.4900e0039.4900e003Off-Road 0.1278 0.7519 1.6924 3.2500e003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Total 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5917 271.5917 0.0846 0.0000 273.7054 003
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5917 271.5917 0.0846 0.0000 273.7054 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.6 Paving - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Total 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004
0.0000 14.4050 14.4050 4.7000e0040.0157 1.1000e- 0.0000 14.4169 004
0.0158 4.1600e0031.0000e0044.2600e003Worker 0.0103 6.9700e0030.0692 1.6000e004 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5914 271.5914 0.0846 0.0000 273.7051 003
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2145 2.2865 1.9309 2.9700e- 0.1248 0.1248 0.1148 0.1148 0.0000 271.5914 271.5914 0.0846 0.0000 273.7051 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Total 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Worker 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0670 89.0670 0.0282 0.0000 89.7715 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0670 89.0670 0.0282 0.0000 89.7715 004
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 97.4990 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Total 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005
0.0000 4.6597 4.6597 1.4000e0045.2200e- 0.0000 4.6632
003
3.0000e0055.2500e0031.3900e0033.0000e0051.4200e003Worker 3.0800e0032.0300e0030.0203 5.0000e005 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0669 89.0669 0.0282 0.0000 89.7714 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0633 0.6631 0.6379 9.9000e- 0.0359 0.0359 0.0330 0.0330 0.0000 89.0669 89.0669 0.0282 0.0000 89.7714 004
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003
Off-Road 0.0390 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3991 004
Archit. Coating 97.4990 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Total 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Worker 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003Total 97.5380 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3992 004
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003Off-Road 0.0390 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3992 004
0.0000 11.1067 11.1067 9.4000e004
5.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301
003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Total 32.5113 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004
0.0000 11.1067 11.1067 9.4000e0045.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301 003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Off-Road 0.0116 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004 Archit. Coating 32.4997 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Total 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890
1.0621 7.2600e- 0.0000 977.6204 977.6204 0.0322 0.0000 978.4254 003
1.0693 0.2823 6.6900e003Worker 0.6955 0.4731 4.6954 0.0108 0.2890 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 3.1700e003Total 97.5380 0.2618 0.2420 3.9000e- 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 33.3991 004
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
0.0000 11.1066 11.1066 9.4000e0045.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301 003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Total 32.5113 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004
0.0000 11.1066 11.1066 9.4000e0045.6000e- 0.0000 11.1301 003
5.6000e0035.6000e0035.6000e003Off-Road 0.0116 0.0798 0.0801 1.3000e004 Archit. Coating 32.4997 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e0030.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742 003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Total 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e0030.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742 003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Worker 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e003
0.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742
003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Total 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
0.0000 316.2387 316.2387 9.4200e0030.3540 2.3500e- 0.0000 316.4742 003
0.3564 0.0941 2.1600e003Worker 0.2092 0.1377 1.3799 3.5000e- 0.0963 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBioCO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
1.3 User Entered Comments
Only CalEEMod defaults were used.Project Characteristics - CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.029 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
45 Climate Zone 3 Operational Year 2040Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Strip Mall 1,294.67 1000sqft 138.72 1,294,669.00 0
Regional Shopping Center 403.37 1000sqft 37.04 403,370.00 0 Single Family Housing 4,221.00 Dwelling Unit 823.55 7,597,800.00 12072 Apartments Mid Rise 2,910.00 Dwelling Unit 103.55 2,910,000.00 8323 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 42.63 Acre 42.63 0.00 0
Junior College (2Yr) 308.49 1000sqft 23.61 308,493.00 0 Government Office Building 16.99 1000sqft 1.95 16,988.00 0 Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 2,489.07 1000sqft 114.28 2,489,065.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/31/2017 9:14 PM Construction - Fresno County, Summary Report
Construction
Fresno, Summary Report
15.0166 W 24.3263 S 149.9310 W 158.6809 S 0.8229 S 53.0520 W 15.0166 W
0.8483 S 53.4458 W 15.3914 W
2023 Building Construction 24.3263 S 149.9310 W 158.6809 S 0.8229 S 53.0520 W
0.8483 S 53.4458 W 15.3914 W 27.2557 S 187.3526 W 174.2828 S 199.5350 W 189.1126 S 0.8674 S 53.6668 W 15.5997 W
2022 Building Construction 27.2557 S 187.3526 W 174.2828 S
16.2685 W
2021 Building Construction 29.4365 S 199.5350 W 189.1126 S 0.8674 S 53.6668 W 15.5997 W 29.4365 S
16.2685 W 32.6465 S 220.1385 W 208.0496 S 0.8863 S 54.3686 W
0.9040 S 55.0382 W 16.9060 W
2020 Building Construction 32.6465 S 220.1385 W 208.0496 S 0.8863 S 54.3686 W
0.9040 S 55.0382 W 16.9060 W 36.5558 S 241.1706 W 232.4517 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W 17.3712 W
2019 Building Construction 36.5558 S 241.1706 W 232.4517 S
5.8389 W
2018 Building Construction 40.6521 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W 17.3712 W 40.6521 S
5.8389 W 4.8556 S 54.8583 W 34.1390 S 0.0643 S 11.2369 W
0.0644 S 11.4884 W 6.0703 W
2019 Grading 4.8556 S 54.8583 W 34.1390 S 0.0643 S 11.2369 W
0.0644 S 11.4884 W 6.0703 W 5.2194 S 59.8853 W 35.9513 S
48.5544 W 23.2569 S 0.0402 S 20.8079 W 12.3477 W
2018 Grading 5.2194 S 59.8853 W 35.9513 S
1.7089 W
2018 Site Preparation 4.6801 S 48.5544 W 23.2569 S 0.0402 S 20.8079 W 12.3477 W 4.6801 S
1.7089 W 3.6031 S 36.1041 W 22.6424 S 0.0407 S 1.9345 W
0.0407 S 2.0785 W 1.8444 W
2019 Demolition 3.6031 S 36.1041 W 22.6424 S 0.0407 S 1.9345 W
0.0407 S 2.0785 W 1.8444 W 3.8185 S 38.6665 W 22.9626 S PM10 PM2.5
Year Phase lb/day
2018 Demolition 3.8185 S 38.6665 W 22.9626 S
ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 ROG NOX CO SO2
Peak Daily Construction Emissions
Peak Daily Construction Emissions
Unmitigated Mitigated
Grading - Fleet Mix - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors -
2.0 Peak Daily Emissions
Land Use - Based on the Dual Land Use scenarioConstruction Phase - Based on CalEEMod default and normalized to an 25-year buildout. Assumes overlap of all phases.Trips and VMT - Assumes one water truck and 2 trips per water truck.
Construction 2018 13,467.2562 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.9357 13,467.2537 1.5072 0.0000 13,504.9331 CH4 N2O CO2e
GHG Activity Year MT/yr
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2
3.0 Annual GHG Emissions
Annual GHG
Annual GHG
Unmitigated Mitigated
Exceed Significance?
17.3712 W
Air District Threshold
17.3712 W 753.4776 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W
0.0913 S 8.5453 S 2.3966 S
Peak Daily Total 753.4776 S 257.6065 W 260.9341 S 0.9215 S 55.5282 W
0.0913 S 8.5453 S 2.3966 S 752.8599 S 5.3026 W 38.4560 S
5.9775 W 43.2659 S 0.0940 S 8.5688 S 2.4200 S
2019 Architectural Coating 752.8599 S 5.3026 W 38.4560 S
0.7920 S
2018 Architectural Coating 753.4776 S 5.9775 W 43.2659 S 0.0940 S 8.5688 S 2.4200 S 753.4776 S
0.7920 S 1.5351 S 15.2951 W 15.2044 S 0.0241 S 0.9486 S
0.0241 S 1.0802 S 0.9131 S
2019 Paving 1.5351 S 15.2951 W 15.2044 S 0.0241 S 0.9486 S
0.0241 S 1.0802 S 0.9131 S 1.7330 S 17.5794 W 15.4066 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W 14.3287 W
2018 Paving 1.7330 S 17.5794 W 15.4066 S
14.3287 W
2036 Building Construction 11.9607 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W 14.3287 W 11.9607 S
14.3287 W 11.9607 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W
0.7053 S 52.3807 W 14.3947 W
2035 Building Construction 11.9607 S 127.5494 W 87.5715 S 0.7012 S 52.3141 W
0.7053 S 52.3807 W 14.3947 W 12.6464 S 128.8452 W 90.4074 S 129.4742 W 93.7263 S 0.7101 S 52.3906 W 14.4038 W
2034 Building Construction 12.6464 S 128.8452 W 90.4074 S
14.4137 W
2033 Building Construction 13.3431 S 129.4742 W 93.7263 S 0.7101 S 52.3906 W 14.4038 W 13.3431 S
14.4137 W 14.1977 S 130.2314 W 97.4276 S 0.7159 S 52.4013 W
0.7227 S 52.4131 W 14.4247 W
2032 Building Construction 14.1977 S 130.2314 W 97.4276 S 0.7159 S 52.4013 W
0.7227 S 52.4131 W 14.4247 W 15.1857 S 131.1262 W 101.7310 S 132.1630 W 106.6551 S 0.7308 S 52.4259 W 14.4365 W
2031 Building Construction 15.1857 S 131.1262 W 101.7310 S
14.7974 W
2030 Building Construction 16.2870 S 132.1630 W 106.6551 S 0.7308 S 52.4259 W 14.4365 W 16.2870 S
14.7974 W 17.3944 S 137.8571 W 111.8001 S 0.7361 S 52.8190 W
0.7469 S 52.8338 W 14.8111 W
2029 Building Construction 17.3944 S 137.8571 W 111.8001 S 0.7361 S 52.8190 W
0.7469 S 52.8338 W 14.8111 W 18.4624 S 139.1653 W 117.6445 S 140.5215 W 123.8764 S 0.7591 S 52.8493 W 14.8255 W
2028 Building Construction 18.4624 S 139.1653 W 117.6445 S
14.8371 W
2027 Building Construction 19.4834 S 140.5215 W 123.8764 S 0.7591 S 52.8493 W 14.8255 W 19.4834 S
14.8371 W 20.4873 S 142.2466 W 131.0835 S 0.7731 S 52.8616 W
0.7869 S 52.8669 W 14.8422 W
2026 Building Construction 20.4873 S 142.2466 W 131.0835 S 0.7731 S 52.8616 W
0.7869 S 52.8669 W 14.8422 W 21.5220 S 144.0282 W 138.3137 S 146.9369 W 147.9268 S 0.8046 S 52.9585 W 14.9283 W
2025 Building Construction 21.5220 S 144.0282 W 138.3137 S2024 Building Construction 22.8278 S 146.9369 W 147.9268 S 0.8046 S 52.9585 W 14.9283 W 22.8278 S Exceed Significance?
Significance ThresholdTotal
6,556.8888 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.64078,149.2761 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.1533 Construction 2036 6,556.8892 0.3501 0.0000 6,565.6410
8,162.0039 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.9740
Construction 2035 8,149.2765 0.4351 0.0000 8,160.1537
8,214.4261 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.5200
Construction 2034 8,162.0043 0.4388 0.0000 8,172.9744
8,340.5459 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.8827
Construction 2033 8,214.4265 0.4438 0.0000 8,225.5204
8,382.6359 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.0760
Construction 2032 8,340.5463 0.4535 0.0000 8,351.8831
8,470.7344 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.3552
Construction 2031 8,382.6363 0.4576 0.0000 8,394.0764
8,532.5561 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.8284
Construction 2030 8,470.7348 0.4648 0.0000 8,482.3556
8,617.2784 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.7156
Construction 2029 8,532.5565 0.5309 0.0000 8,545.8288
8,783.7005 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.3921
Construction 2028 8,617.2788 0.5375 0.0000 8,630.7160
8,937.1834 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.0529
Construction 2027 8,783.7008 0.5477 0.0000 8,797.3925
9,088.4031 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.4426
Construction 2026 8,937.1837 0.5548 0.0000 8,951.0532
9,317.1223 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.3769
Construction 2025 9,088.4034 0.5616 0.0000 9,102.4430
9,444.6039 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.8959
Construction 2024 9,317.1227 0.5702 0.0000 9,331.3773
9,730.5793 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.0799
Construction 2023 9,444.6043 0.5717 0.0000 9,458.8963
9,977.3110 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.6695
Construction 2022 9,730.5796 0.7800 0.0000 9,750.0802
10,223.5775 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.9150
Construction 2021 9,977.3113 0.8143 0.0000 9,997.6699
11,568.1182 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.2018
Construction 2020 10,223.5779 0.8535 0.0000 10,244.9153Construction 2019 11,568.1195 1.1633 0.0000 11,597.2032 Paving Equipment Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
0.00 Pavers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00Graders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change
0.00 Generator Sets Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change
0.00 Excavators Diesel No Change 0 5 No Change 0.00Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change
0.00 Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change
0.00 0.00
OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation
Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioPhase ROG NOx CO SO2 CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Exhaust PM10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1