Exhibit D-1 – Draft Environmental Impact Report with Appendices — Fresno City Council, April 18, 2024 (part 6 of 6)

Table 4-2. Construction Equipment
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type1
Number of
Equipment1
Usage Hours2
(hours/day)
Equipment
Horsepower2
(hp)
Equipment Load
Factor2
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73
Excavators 3 8 158 0.38
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 247 0.4
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 97 0.37
Graders 3 8 187 0.41
Other Construction Equipment 2 8 401 0.42
Paving Equipment 1 8 132 0.36
Rubber Tired Dozers 4 8 247 0.4
Scrapers 2 8 367 0.48
Surfacing Equipment 1 8 263 0.3
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 97 0.37
Excavators 3 8 158 0.38
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2 8 100 0.4
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 247 0.4
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 97 0.37
Excavators 3 8 158 0.38
Rough Terrain Forklifts 2 8 100 0.4
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 247 0.4
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37
Rough Terrain Forklifts 1 8 100 0.4
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 247 0.4
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - California Emissions Estimator Model
hp - horsepower
2 Equipment usage hours, horsepower, and load factor are based on CalEEMod® defaults, with the exception of the horsepower value for "Other Construction Equipment" during the Grading phase. The "Other Construction Equipment" represents soil compactors and is based is based on project-specific data.

Demolition
Grading
Grading/BC Overlap
Building Construction
Paving
1 Number and type of offroad equipment for the Grading, Grading/BC Overlap, Building Construction, and Paving phases based on Projectspecific data. Equipment used in the Demolition and Architectural Coating phases are based on CalEEMod® default values.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 4-3. Construction Material Movement
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Phase Name
Material Imported1
(yd3)
Material Exported1
(yd3)
Grading 60,000 0
Grading/BC Overlap 0 3,000
Notes:
1 Soil import and export quantities based on project-specific data.

Abbreviations:
yd3 - cubic yard

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 4-4. Construction Demolition Assumptions
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Phase Name Size Metric Unit Amount1
Demolition/Site Prep Tons of Debris 10
Notes:
1 Square-footage quantity based on project-specific data.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 4-5. Utility GHG Emission Factor Associated with Renewable Portfolio Standard Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
2017 2018 Average Units
CO2 Intensity Factor per Total Energy
Delivered1 210 206 208 lbs CO2/MWh delivered
% of Total Energy From Renewables2 33.0% 38.9% 36.0%
CO2 Intensity Factor per Total NonRenewable Energy3 314 338 325 lbs CO2/MWh delivered 2020 RPS (33%) 210.4 226.2 218.0 lbs CO2/MWh delivered
2030 RPS (60%) 125.6 135.1 130.1 lbs CO2/MWh delivered
2023 RPS5 185.0 198.9 191.6 lbs CO2/MWh delivered
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2018 208.4 0.033 0.004 210.4
2023 191.61 0.033 0.004 193.6
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CO2 - carbon dioxide CH4 N2O
GHG - greenhouse gases 25 298
lbs - pounds
MT - metric tonnes
MWh - megawatt-hour
PG&E - Pacific Gas and Electric
PUP - Power/Utility Protocol
RPS - Renewable Portfolio Standards
3 The emissions metric presented here is calculated based on the total CO2 emissions divided by the energy delivered from non-renewable sources.
4 The intensity factors for default RPS assumption are calculated by multiplying the percentage of energy delivered from non-renewable energy by the CO2 emissions per total non-renewable energy metric calculated above. The emission factors presented here are 33% RPS for 2020 and 60% RPS for 2030. The estimate provided here and the PUP reports issued by PG&E assume that renewable energy sources do not result in any CO2 emissions. 5 The RPS percentage for the 2023 future year is interpolated from the goals of 33% RPS in 2020 and 60% RPS in 2030.

GWP
6 The most recent emission factor available is for 2017 and 2018, which is why these values are being used to interpolate 2023 emission factors even though more recent sustainability reports by PG&E are available. 2 Percent of total energy from RPS-eligible renewables are from the PG&E 2018 and 2019 Corporate Responsibility Reports. Available at: http://www.pgecorp.com/corp_responsibility/reports/2018/assets/PGE_CRSR_2018.pdf and http://www.pgecorp.com/corp_responsibility/reports/2019/assets/PGE_CRSR_2019.pdf. Accessed: September 2021.

Energy Delivered
[MWh]
Calculated Intensity Factors for Total Energy Delivered4 Year
Emission Factors
(lb/MWh)
1 2017 and 2018 intensity factors per total energy delivered available at: https://www.theclimateregistry.org/ourmembers/cris-public-reports/. Accessed: September 2021.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 4-6. TRU Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Herndon/Riverside Herndon/Riverside
410 712 57.5
Notes:

Abbreviations:
bhp-hr - brake horsepower hour SJVAPCD - San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District CARB - California Air Resources Board TRU - Transportation Refrigeration unit CO2 - Carbon Dioxide equivalents
g - gram
Constants:

Horsepower 3 50 bhp
Load Factor 4 0.38
TRU Cycle Duration 5 622 minutes
Density of Diesel 3,221 g/gal
Conversion Factors:
453.592 g/lb
1000000 g/MT
60 min/hr
365 day/year
2000 lb/ton
MT - metric tonnes
2 Approximately 15% of warehouse delivery trucks are equipped with TRUs.

Number of Round
Trips with TRUs2
Annual Average CO2
Emissions (MT/year)
5 TRU Cycle Duration is based on 2 hours of off-site loading time plus the duration of the on-site and off-site transit. It is assumed that loading/unloading will occur while the TRU is plugged in, so no emissions are estimated for this time period. Assumptions based on Table II.G.1 of CARB Proposed Amendments to the Airborne Toxic Control Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets, and Facilities Where TRUs Operate. Available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/board/rulemaking/tru2021/appi.pdf. Accessed: May 2022.

CO2 Emission
Factor1
(g/bhp-hr)
1 Emission factors obtained from OFFROAD2021 emissions output for Calendar Year 2023, Transportation Refrigeration Unit - Instate Trailer and Transportation Refrigeration Unit - Out-Of-State Trailer in Fresno County.
3 Horsepower is based on SJVAPCD Guidance for Air Dispersion Modeling, section 2.3.1 Transportation Refrigeration unit (TRU), Modeling Parameters.
4 Load factor obtained from CARB Draft 2019 Update to Emissions Inventory for Transport Refrigeration Units, for TRUs Over 25 hp, 2013 and newer. Available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/coldstorage/documents/hra_emissioninventory2019.pdf. Accessed: January 2022.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 4-7. Summary of GHG Emissions
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California

0.02 334
21,482
38 540
22,393
35 22,428
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel
CH4 - methane
CO2 - carbon dioxide
CO2e - carbon dioxide equivalents
EMFAC - EMission FACtors model
MT - metric tonnes
TRU - Transportation Refrigeration unit
6 Sum of annualized one-time emissions and operational emissions. 1 One-time emissions (i.e., construction) and operational emissions were calculated using CalEEMod®. See Appendix A for details
2 Emissions are presented as CO2e, which include CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions, weighted by their respective global warming potentials. 3 Emissions shown as zero may be non-zero values, however, they are below a meaningful reporting level for this analysis.
4 Total mobile emissions include emissions from on-road vehicles and TRUs. On-road mobile emissions were estimated using CalEEMod® default trip lengths, EMFAC2021 emission factors, and Project-specific vehicle trip rates provided by Kittelson & Associates, See Appendix B for details. TRU emissions were estimated using OFFROAD2021 emission factors.
5 One-time emissions from construction were amortized over a 30-year period.

GHG Emissions2,3
(MT CO2e/yr)
Operational Sub-Total
Construction Amortized5
Total6
Waste Disposed
Area Sources
Energy Usage
Mobile4
Water
Emissions Category1

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 5-1. Summary of ABAU and Project GHG Emissions in 2030 and 2035 Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
2030 2035 2030 2035

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
275 233 148 148
24,342 22,504 21,782 16,943
34 31 34 31
540 540 365 365
25,191 23,308 22,328 17,487

1.5% 11.6%
381 2,711
Notes:

Abbreviations:

ABAU - Adjusted Business-As-Usual HHDT - heavy-heavy duty trucks CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel MT - metric tonnes CH4 - methane N2O - nitrous oxide
CO2 - carbon dioxide PG&E - Pacific Gas & Electric
CO2e - carbon dioxide equivalents RPS - Renewable Portfolio Standard EMFAC - EMission FACtors model TRU - Transportation Refrigeration unit GHG - greenhouse gases yr - year
GHGRP - Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
9 The solid waste generation for ABAU was estimated using CalEEMod® defaults. The Project emissions were estimated based on the State goal of a 75% waste diversion target and Fresno's GHGRP methodology. Please see footnote 10 in Table 5-2 for more details. 10 The percent reduction for the Project are the same percentage reduction required, i.e., 1.5% reduction in 2030 and 11.6% in 2035 from Table 4-C in the Fresno GHGRP.
11 Emission reduction needed from ABAU is calculated as the percent reduction from the operational total. The Project emissions do not include an emission reduction since this is solely based on the ABAU conditions. 4 The Project emissions take into account the project commitments in line with the local measures established by the GHGRP, which includes Land Use Strategies and Transportation Demand Management, Electric Vehicle Charging Stations, Net Zero Energy Commercial Building, Water Conservation, and Waste Diversion and Recycling. It also takes into account additional local measures that would result in project emissions reductions beyond the ABAU scenario, such as the Advanced Clean Trucks regulation and the Executive Order N-79-20. The exact assumptions made for the project emissions inventory reductions are detailed in Table 5-2. 5 The project's ABAU emissions accounts for RPS-required improvements to the electric grid carbon intensity, while the Project emissions account for 100% solar energy, based on the Project's commitment to the PG&E's "Solar Choice" program, which provides 100% solar electricity to customers. 6 For both the ABAU and Project emissions, total mobile emissions include emissions from on-road vehicles and TRUs, using Project-specific vehicle trip rates provided by Kittelson & Associates. TRU emissions were estimated using OFFROAD2021 emission factors. 7 For the ABAU emissions, on-road mobile emissions were estimated using CalEEMod® default trip lengths, EMFAC2021 emission factors, and fleet mix assumptions for employee and member vehicles to represent the same assumptions as the GHGRP. Based on the available EMFAC version at the time of the GHGRP preparation (i.e., EMFAC2017), the analysis assumes extracted data from EMFAC2017. For the delivery truck fleet mix, the analysis made a simplifying assumption that the fraction of natural gas and gasoline-powered HHDT would be diesel-powered. 8 For the Project emissions, on-road mobile emissions were estimated using CalEEMod® default trip lengths, EMFAC2021 emission factors, and EMFAC2021 fleet mix for delivery trucks. The fleet mixes for employee and member light duty vehicles are based on the Draft 2022 Scoping Plan E3 Modeling workbook. Please see footnote 7 in Table 5-2 for more details.

GHG Emissions2
(MT CO2e/yr)
Operational Total
Waste Disposed9
Area Sources
Energy Usage5
Mobile6,7,8
Water
Emissions Category1
ABAU3 Project4
Percent Reduction Needed From ABAU10
Emission Reduction Needed11
1 Operational emissions were calculated using CalEEMod®. See Appendix A for details. 2 Emissions are presented as CO2e, which include CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions, weighted by their respective global warming potentials. 3 The ABAU emissions account for the local regulations that were in place at the time the Fresno GHGRP was published. --
--

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 5-2. Local Measures Reductions Table for 2030 and 2035 Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
2030 2035
Land Use Strategies and Transportation
Demand Management2 48 36
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations3,4,5 230 862
Advanced Clean Trucks6 142 297
ZEV Regulations7 2,418 5,265
Commercial Energy Net Zero Energy Commercial Building8 127 85 Industrial Energy (water) Water Conservation9 00
Solid Waste Waste Diversion and Recycling10 175 175
3,140 6,719
381 2,711

YES YES
Notes:

Abbreviations:

ABAU - Adjusted Business-As-Usual MT - metric tonnes
CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel PG&E - Pacific Gas & Electric CalGreen - California Green Building Standards Code RPS - Renewable Portfolio Standard CO2e - carbon dioxide equivalents TIA - transportation impact assessment EMFAC - EMissions FACtor Model VMT - vehicle mile traveled EV - electric vehicle ZEV - zero emission vehicle
GHGRP - Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan
Sector Local Measures
Emissions Reductions (MT CO2e/year)
11 The reduction needed is calculated based on the percent reduction from ABAU needed in Table 4-C in the Fresno GHGRP. 8 The project has committed to PG&E's "Solar Choice" program, which provides 100% solar electricity to customers. The ABAU emissions for commercial building energy accounts for RPS-required improvements to the electric grid carbon intensity, and the improvements from this in 2030 and 2035 reflect the Project's commitment to PG&E's "Solar Choice" program.
9 The project will align with CalGreen2019, which is accounted for in Fresno's GHGRP ABAU emissions. 10 The ABAU solid waste generation was estimated using CalEEMod® defaults assumes a 63% employee-based diversion rate statewide, based on 2010 CalRecycle data, available here:
https://calrecycle.ca.gov/lgcentral/goalmeasure/disposalrate/graphs/estdiversion/. Accessed: August 2022. The improvement from ABAU was estimated based on the State goal of a 75% waste diversion target and Fresno's GHGRP methodology.

Transportation1
1 The ABAU emissions for the transportation emissions inventory utilizes EMFAC2017 fleet mix defaults which takes into account the State policies that were in place at the time of the Fresno GHG Reduction Plan Update release. 3 The number of electric vehicle chargers assumed for 2030/2035 aligns with CalGreen2022 requirements, see Table

5.106.5.3.1. Available here: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CAGBC2022P1/chapter-5-nonresidential-mandatorymeasures. Accessed: August 2022. 4 For 2030, Annual energy delivery is estimated based on an average monthly energy delivery of 588 kWh per charging station for conventional Level 2 chargers, as reported by the California Energy Commission. Available at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/2018publications/CEC-500-2018-020/CEC-500-2018-020.pdf. 5 For 2035, it is assumed that the EV chargers will be used 8 hours/day at 25 miles per hour of charge in line with the increase in EVs predicted by the Draft 2022 Scoping Plan E3 PATHWAYS Modeling Workbook. 6 EMFAC2021 fleet mix defaults are utilized for the delivery truck fleet mixes, which represents the improvement from ABAU due to the Advanced Clean Trucks regulation which became effective March 2021 and was incorporated into the EMFAC2021 model. This regulation requires an increasing number of zero emission truck sales over time starting in 2024. Available here: https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/. Accessed: August 2022. 7 The member and employee light-duty vehicle fleet assumptions were based on Executive Order N-79-20, which requires that by 2035 100% of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks will be zero-emission by 2035. The fleet mix projections were calculated to align with the Draft 2022 Scoping Plan Update E3 PATHWAYS modeling workbook, which provides year-by-year fleet projections that align with this Executive Order. The E3 Modeling workbook can be found here:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/2022-draft-sp-PATHWAYS-data-E3.xlsx. Accessed: August 2022. 2 Costco will provide a voluntary commute trip reduction program for employees that can result in a 4% reduction in employee vehicle trips, based on Kittelson & Associates TIA.

Total
Reduction Needed11
Reduction Met?

Page 1 of 1 ends

Costco Commercial Center
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report
Fresno, California
Ramboll

APPENDIX A
CALEEMOD® OUTPUT
Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project-specific information (RPS Emission Factor)Land Use - Project-specific informationConstruction Phase - Project-specific informationOff-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Project-specific informationOff-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Project-specific informationOff-road Equipment - Project-specific informationOff-road Equipment - Project-specific information

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 889.00 Space 15.55 355,600.00 0
Automobile Care Center 4.80 1000sqft 0.11 4,800.00 0
Discount Club 241.34 1000sqft 5.54 241,340.00 0
Gasoline/Service Station 32.00 Pump 1.33 4,517.60 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Rural3
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
191.61 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT - Project-specific informationDemolition - Project-specific informationGrading - Project-specific informationVehicle Trips - Unmitigated Construction RunConsumer Products - Unmitigated Construction RunArea Coating - Unmitigated Construction Run Landscape Equipment - Unmitigated Construction RunEnergy Use - Unmitigated Construction RunWater And Wastewater - Unmitigated Construction RunSolid Waste - Unmitigated Construction RunConstruction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water 2x/day to comply with SJVAPCD Rule 8021. All construction equipment >50 hp mitigated to Tier 3 + Level 3 DPF.Vehicle Emission Factors -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 125329 0tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 375986 0tblAreaCoating Area_Parking 21336 0 tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3
tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation DPF No Change Level 3tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 14.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 14.00tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 370.00 110.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 7.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 35.00 30.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblConstructionPhase NumDays 35.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 40.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 7.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase NumDaysWeek 5.00 6.00tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/11/2025 11/10/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/14/2025 11/10/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/26/2023 5/8/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/28/2023 6/12/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/15/2023 7/5/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/14/2025 9/13/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/9/2023 5/8/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/15/2025 9/14/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/16/2023 7/6/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/10/2023 5/9/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/29/2023 6/13/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 2/15/2025 7/29/2023tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/27/2023 5/1/2023 tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 0tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_Degreaser 3.542E-07 0tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF_PesticidesFertilizers 5.152E-08 0 tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.70 0.00tblEnergyUse LightingElect 3.71 0.00tblEnergyUse LightingElect 2.70 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.35 0.00
tblEnergyUse NT24E 4.16 0.00tblEnergyUse NT24E 2.30 0.00tblEnergyUse NT24E 4.16 0.00tblEnergyUse NT24NG 3.84 0.00tblEnergyUse NT24NG 2.08 0.00tblEnergyUse NT24NG 3.84 0.00tblEnergyUse T24E 1.75 0.00tblEnergyUse T24E 1.91 0.00tblEnergyUse T24E 1.75 0.00tblEnergyUse T24NG 16.86 0.00tblEnergyUse T24NG 8.53 0.00tblEnergyUse T24NG 16.86 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,000.00tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 60,000.00 tblLandscapeEquipment NumberSummerDays 180 0
tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.00 15.55tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 1.33 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 172.00 401.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 4.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 3.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 203.98 191.61tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 18.34 0.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 1,037.93 0.00tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 17.25 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1.00 2.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 53.75 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 182.17 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 33.67 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 166.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 41.80 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 172.01 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 451,589.32 0.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 17,876,662.33 0.00tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 425,020.45 0.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 276,780.55 0.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 10,956,664.01 0.00tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 260,496.40 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 2.2806 4.5511 3.7117 0.0113 0.9356 0.1729 1.1085 0.3872 0.1595 0.5467 0.0000 1,026.939 5 1,026.939
5 0.1854 0.0533 1,047.441
0 Maximum 2.2806 4.5511 3.7117 0.0113 0.9356 0.1729 1.1085 0.3872 0.1595 0.5467 0.0000 1,026.939 5 1,026.939
5 0.1854 0.0533 1,047.441
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 2.0686 3.9074 4.6415 0.0113 0.5786 0.0294 0.6080 0.2169 0.0291 0.2459 0.0000 1,026.938 8 1,026.938
8 0.1854 0.0533 1,047.440
3 Maximum 2.0686 3.9074 4.6415 0.0113 0.5786 0.0294 0.6080 0.2169 0.0291 0.2459 0.0000 1,026.938 8 1,026.938
8 0.1854 0.0533 1,047.440
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

9.30 14.14 -25.05 0.00 38.16 82.99 45.15 43.99 81.76 55.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-1-2023 7-31-2023 3.2883 2.75152 8-1-2023 9-30-2023 2.0410 1.7429 Highest 3.2883 2.7515

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2023 5/8/2023 6 72 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/1/2023 5/8/2023 6 73 Grading Grading 5/9/2023 6/12/2023 6 30 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4 Grading/BC Overlap Grading 6/13/2023 7/5/2023 6 20
5 Building Construction Building Construction 7/6/2023 11/10/2023 6 1106 Paving Paving 7/29/2023 9/13/2023 6 407 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 9/14/2023 11/10/2023 6 50
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37Grading Graders 3 8.00 187 0.41Grading Other Construction Equipment 2 8.00 401 0.42Grading Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 4 8.00 247 0.40Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48Grading Surfacing Equipment 1 8.00 263 0.30Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Grading/BC Overlap Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38Grading/BC Overlap Rough Terrain Forklifts 2 8.00 100 0.40Grading/BC Overlap Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Grading/BC Overlap Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37Building Construction Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 375,986; Non-Residential Outdoor: 125,329; Striped Parking Area: 21,336 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Gradin
g (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Gradin
g (Gradin
g Phase): 165
Acres of Pavin
g: 15.55
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction EquipmentUse DPF for Construction EquipmentWater Exposed AreaBuilding Construction Rough Terrain Forklifts 2 8.00 100 0.40Building Construction Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Paving Rough Terrain Forklifts 1 8.00 100 0.40Paving Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTSite Preparation 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 15 38.00 0.00 7,500.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading/BC Overlap 11 28.00 0.00 375.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTBuilding Construction 11 230.00 99.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 46.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.1000e004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.9400e003 0.0752 0.0688 1.4000e- 004 3.4900e- 003 3.4900e- 003 3.2500e- 003 3.2500e- 003 0.0000 11.8972 11.8972 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 11.9805 Total 7.9400e003 0.0752 0.0688 1.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 3.4900e- 003 3.6000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.2500e- 003 3.2700e- 003 0.0000 11.8972 11.8972 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 11.9805 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 1.3000e004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0567 0.0567 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0593 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.1000e004 1.5000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 6.6000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.5083 0.5083 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5126 Total 2.1000e004 2.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.5650 0.5650 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.5719 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 5.0000e005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.2400e003 0.0641 0.0864 1.4000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 11.8972 11.8972 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 11.9805 Total 3.2400e003 0.0641 0.0864 1.4000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 11.8972 11.8972 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 11.9805 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 1.3000e004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0567 0.0567 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0593 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.1000e004 1.5000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 6.6000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.5083 0.5083 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5126 Total 2.1000e004 2.8000e- 004 1.8000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.5650 0.5650 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.5719 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1200e003 0.0215 0.0312 4.0000e- 005 1.0600e- 003 1.0600e- 003 9.8000e- 004 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.8302 3.8302 1.2400e- 003 0.0000 3.8612 Total 2.1200e003 0.0215 0.0312 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0600e- 003 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 9.8000e- 004 9.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.8302 3.8302 1.2400e- 003 0.0000 3.8612 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3389 0.3389 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3417 Total 1.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3389 0.3389 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3417 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0600e003 0.0243 0.0328 4.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.8302 3.8302 1.2400e- 003 0.0000 3.8612 Total 1.0600e003 0.0243 0.0328 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.6000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.6000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.8302 3.8302 1.2400e- 003 0.0000 3.8612 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3389 0.3389 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3417 Total 1.4000e004 1.0000e- 004 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3389 0.3389 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3417 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.4522 0.0000 0.4522 0.2086 0.0000 0.2086 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1079 1.1479 0.7006 1.9600e003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0428 0.0428 0.0000 172.1647 172.1647 0.0557 0.0000 173.5567 Total 0.1079 1.1479 0.7006 1.9600e003 0.4522 0.0465 0.4987 0.2086 0.0428 0.2514 0.0000 172.1647 172.1647 0.0557 0.0000 173.5567 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 8.0000e003 0.4693 0.0990 2.2100e- 003 0.0642 4.4300e- 003 0.0686 0.0177 4.2400e- 003 0.0219 0.0000 212.4374 212.4374 1.3900e- 003 0.0334 222.4289 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.3000e003 1.6100e- 003 0.0192 6.0000e- 005 7.0900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 7.1200e- 003 1.8800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.9100e- 003 0.0000 5.5190 5.5190 1.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 5.5650 Total 0.0103 0.4709 0.1182 2.2700e003 0.0713 4.4600e- 003 0.0757 0.0195 4.2700e- 003 0.0238 0.0000 217.9564 217.9564 1.5200e- 003 0.0336 227.9939 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.2035 0.0000 0.2035 0.0939 0.0000 0.0939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0480 0.9363 1.0751 1.9600e003 5.6200e- 003 5.6200e- 003 5.6200e- 003 5.6200e- 003 0.0000 172.1645 172.1645 0.0557 0.0000 173.5565 Total 0.0480 0.9363 1.0751 1.9600e003 0.2035 5.6200e- 003 0.2091 0.0939 5.6200e- 003 0.0995 0.0000 172.1645 172.1645 0.0557 0.0000 173.5565 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 8.0000e003 0.4693 0.0990 2.2100e- 003 0.0642 4.4300e- 003 0.0686 0.0177 4.2400e- 003 0.0219 0.0000 212.4374 212.4374 1.3900e- 003 0.0334 222.4289 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 2.3000e003 1.6100e- 003 0.0192 6.0000e- 005 7.0900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 7.1200e- 003 1.8800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.9100e- 003 0.0000 5.5190 5.5190 1.3000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 5.5650 Total 0.0103 0.4709 0.1182 2.2700e003 0.0713 4.4600e- 003 0.0757 0.0195 4.2700e- 003 0.0238 0.0000 217.9564 217.9564 1.5200e- 003 0.0336 227.9939 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Grading/BC Overlap - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1967 0.0000 0.1967 0.1011 0.0000 0.1011 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0329 0.3343 0.3036 5.7000e004 0.0151 0.0151 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 50.3819 50.3819 0.0163 0.0000 50.7893 Total 0.0329 0.3343 0.3036 5.7000e004 0.1967 0.0151 0.2118 0.1011 0.0139 0.1149 0.0000 50.3819 50.3819 0.0163 0.0000 50.7893 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.0000e004 0.0235 4.9500e- 003 1.1000e- 004 3.2100e- 003 2.2000e- 004 3.4300e- 003 8.8000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 1.0900e- 003 0.0000 10.6219 10.6219 7.0000e- 005 1.6700e- 003 11.1215 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1300e003 7.9000e- 004 9.4400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 003 9.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.7111 2.7111 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.7337 Total 1.5300e003 0.0243 0.0144 1.4000e- 004 6.6900e- 003 2.4000e- 004 6.9300e- 003 1.8000e- 003 2.2000e- 004 2.0300e- 003 0.0000 13.3329 13.3329 1.3000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 13.8551 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Grading/BC Overlap - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0885 0.0000 0.0885 0.0455 0.0000 0.0455 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0141 0.2857 0.3759 5.7000e004 2.1800e- 003 2.1800e- 003 2.1800e- 003 2.1800e- 003 0.0000 50.3819 50.3819 0.0163 0.0000 50.7892 Total 0.0141 0.2857 0.3759 5.7000e004 0.0885 2.1800e- 003 0.0907 0.0455 2.1800e- 003 0.0477 0.0000 50.3819 50.3819 0.0163 0.0000 50.7892 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.0000e004 0.0235 4.9500e- 003 1.1000e- 004 3.2100e- 003 2.2000e- 004 3.4300e- 003 8.8000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 1.0900e- 003 0.0000 10.6219 10.6219 7.0000e- 005 1.6700e- 003 11.1215 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.1300e003 7.9000e- 004 9.4400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.4800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 003 9.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.7111 2.7111 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.7337 Total 1.5300e003 0.0243 0.0144 1.4000e- 004 6.6900e- 003 2.4000e- 004 6.9300e- 003 1.8000e- 003 2.2000e- 004 2.0300e- 003 0.0000 13.3329 13.3329 1.3000e- 004 1.7400e- 003 13.8551 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1776 1.8072 1.6238 3.0900e003 0.0814 0.0814 0.0748 0.0748 0.0000 271.4578 271.4578 0.0878 0.0000 273.6527 Total 0.1776 1.8072 1.6238 3.0900e003 0.0814 0.0814 0.0748 0.0748 0.0000 271.4578 271.4578 0.0878 0.0000 273.6527 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.6200e003 0.2227 0.0698 1.0000e- 003 0.0327 1.3900e- 003 0.0340 9.4400e- 003 1.3300e- 003 0.0108 0.0000 95.4877 95.4877 5.3000e- 004 0.0144 99.7859 Worker 0.0511 0.0357 0.4263 1.3400e003 0.1573 7.3000e- 004 0.1580 0.0418 6.7000e- 004 0.0425 0.0000 122.4820 122.4820 2.9000e- 003 3.1900e- 003 123.5038 Total 0.0567 0.2584 0.4961 2.3400e003 0.1899 2.1200e- 003 0.1920 0.0512 2.0000e- 003 0.0532 0.0000 217.9697 217.9697 3.4300e- 003 0.0176 223.2896 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0758 1.5354 2.0193 3.0900e003 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 271.4575 271.4575 0.0878 0.0000 273.6524 Total 0.0758 1.5354 2.0193 3.0900e003 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 271.4575 271.4575 0.0878 0.0000 273.6524 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.6200e003 0.2227 0.0698 1.0000e- 003 0.0327 1.3900e- 003 0.0340 9.4400e- 003 1.3300e- 003 0.0108 0.0000 95.4877 95.4877 5.3000e- 004 0.0144 99.7859 Worker 0.0511 0.0357 0.4263 1.3400e003 0.1573 7.3000e- 004 0.1580 0.0418 6.7000e- 004 0.0425 0.0000 122.4820 122.4820 2.9000e- 003 3.1900e- 003 123.5038 Total 0.0567 0.2584 0.4961 2.3400e003 0.1899 2.1200e- 003 0.1920 0.0512 2.0000e- 003 0.0532 0.0000 217.9697 217.9697 3.4300e- 003 0.0176 223.2896 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0356 0.3745 0.2593 5.4000e004 0.0168 0.0168 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 47.0096 47.0096 0.0152 0.0000 47.3896 Paving 0.0204 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0559 0.3745 0.2593 5.4000e004 0.0168 0.0168 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 47.0096 47.0096 0.0152 0.0000 47.3896 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.0500e003 7.3000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2500e- 003 8.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5174 2.5174 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.5384 Total 1.0500e003 7.3000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2500e- 003 8.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5174 2.5174 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.5384 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0131 0.2697 0.3271 5.4000e004 2.0600e- 003 2.0600e- 003 2.0600e- 003 2.0600e- 003 0.0000 47.0095 47.0095 0.0152 0.0000 47.3896 Paving 0.0204 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0335 0.2697 0.3271 5.4000e004 2.0600e- 003 2.0600e- 003 2.0600e- 003 2.0600e- 003 0.0000 47.0095 47.0095 0.0152 0.0000 47.3896 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 1.0500e003 7.3000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2500e- 003 8.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5174 2.5174 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.5384 Total 1.0500e003 7.3000e- 004 8.7600e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2500e- 003 8.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5174 2.5174 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.5384 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.8 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.8169 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.7900e003 0.0326 0.0453 7.0000e- 005 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e- 003 0.0000 6.3831 6.3831 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.3927 Total 1.8217 0.0326 0.0453 7.0000e005 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e- 003 0.0000 6.3831 6.3831 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.3927 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.6500e003 3.2500e- 003 0.0388 1.2000e- 004 0.0143 7.0000e- 005 0.0144 3.8000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.8600e- 003 0.0000 11.1347 11.1347 2.6000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 11.2276 Total 4.6500e003 3.2500e- 003 0.0388 1.2000e- 004 0.0143 7.0000e- 005 0.0144 3.8000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.8600e- 003 0.0000 11.1347 11.1347 2.6000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 11.2276 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.8 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.8169 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4900e003 0.0339 0.0458 7.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.3831 6.3831 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.3927 Total 1.8184 0.0339 0.0458 7.0000e005 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.3831 6.3831 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.3927 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 4.6500e003 3.2500e- 003 0.0388 1.2000e- 004 0.0143 7.0000e- 005 0.0144 3.8000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.8600e- 003 0.0000 11.1347 11.1347 2.6000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 11.2276 Total 4.6500e003 3.2500e- 003 0.0388 1.2000e- 004 0.0143 7.0000e- 005 0.0144 3.8000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 3.8600e- 003 0.0000 11.1347 11.1347 2.6000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 11.2276 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Automobile Care Center 0.00 0.00 0.00
Discount Club 0.00 0.00 0.00
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 14.70 6.60 6.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 21 51 28 Discount Club 14.70 6.60 6.60 16.70 64.30 19.00 45 40 15 Gasoline/Service Station 14.70 6.60 6.60 2.00 79.00 19.00 14 27 59 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 14.70 6.60 6.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.510058 0.053037 0.175964 0.161396 0.026773 0.007006 0.013819 0.022114 0.000717 0.000291 0.024206 0.001529 0.003090 Discount Club 0.510058 0.053037 0.175964 0.161396 0.026773 0.007006 0.013819 0.022114 0.000717 0.000291 0.024206 0.001529 0.003090 Gasoline/Service Station 0.510058 0.053037 0.175964 0.161396 0.026773 0.007006 0.013819 0.022114 0.000717 0.000291 0.024206 0.001529 0.003090 Parking Lot 0.510058 0.053037 0.175964 0.161396 0.026773 0.007006 0.013819 0.022114 0.000717 0.000291 0.024206 0.001529 0.003090

5.0 Energy Detail5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Discount Club 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Gasoline/Service
Station
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Discount Club 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Gasoline/Service
Station
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Discount Club 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gasoline/Service
Station
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Discount Club 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gasoline/Service
Station
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Discount Club 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gasoline/Service
Station
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Discount Club 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gasoline/Service
Station
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 37 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Discount Club 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Gasoline/Service
Station
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 38 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 39 of 39 Date: 11/21/2022 12:59 PM Costco Fresno Mitigated Construction Run - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Costco Fresno (Project) Operation
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project-specific values (RPS emission factor)Land Use - Project-specific valuesConstruction Phase - Operational runOff-road Equipment - Operational runVehicle Trips - Project-specific values, mobile emissions calculated seperatelyConsumer Products - Updated emission factor for consumer products to refine the VOC emissions based on recent CARB regulations.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 889.00 Space 8.00 355,600.00 0
Automobile Care Center 4.80 1000sqft 0.11 4,800.00 0
Discount Club 241.34 1000sqft 5.54 241,340.00 0
Gasoline/Service Station 32.00 Pump 0.10 4,517.60 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Rural3
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
191.61 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 1.62E-05
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 203.98 191.61tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 53.75 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 182.17 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 33.67 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 166.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 41.80 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 172.01 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Highest

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Energy 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 330.8528 330.8528 0.0345 6.5300e- 003 333.6620 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 217.9149 0.0000 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9496 12.3158 18.2653 0.6132 0.0147 37.9717 Total 0.9616 0.1351 0.1241 8.1000e004 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 223.8644 343.1895 567.0539 13.5261 0.0212 911.5307 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Energy 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 330.8528 330.8528 0.0345 6.5300e- 003 333.6620 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 217.9149 0.0000 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9496 12.3158 18.2653 0.6132 0.0147 37.9717 Total 0.9616 0.1351 0.1241 8.1000e004 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 223.8644 343.1895 567.0539 13.5261 0.0212 911.5307 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2023 4/30/2023 5 20
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 8.00 81 0.73Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 158 0.38Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 0 8.00 247 0.40 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 8
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Automobile Care Center 0.00 0.00 0.00
Discount Club 0.00 0.00 0.00
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 14.70 6.60 6.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 21 51 28 Discount Club 14.70 6.60 6.60 16.70 64.30 19.00 45 40 15 Gasoline/Service Station 14.70 6.60 6.60 2.00 79.00 19.00 14 27 59 Parking Lot 14.70 6.60 6.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 183.9160 183.9160 0.0317 3.8400e003 185.8520 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 183.9160 183.9160 0.0317 3.8400e003 185.8520 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.6900e- 003 147.8100 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.6900e- 003 147.8100

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0138 0.1255 0.1054 7.5000e004 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 0.0000 136.6443 136.6443 2.6200e- 003 2.5100e- 003 137.4563 Gasoline/Service
Station
93514.3 5.0000e004 4.5800e- 003 3.8500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.9903 4.9903 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.0199 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.7000e- 003 147.8100 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0138 0.1255 0.1054 7.5000e004 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 0.0000 136.6443 136.6443 2.6200e- 003 2.5100e- 003 137.4563 Gasoline/Service
Station
93514.3 5.0000e004 4.5800e- 003 3.8500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.9903 4.9903 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.0199 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.7000e- 003 147.8100 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
41328 3.5919 6.2000e004 7.0000e- 005 3.6297
Discount Club 1.91141e
+006
166.1263 0.0286 3.4700e003 167.8751
Gasoline/Service
Station
38896.5 3.3806 5.8000e004 7.0000e- 005 3.4162
Parking Lot 124460 10.8172 1.8600e003 2.3000e- 004 10.9310 Total 183.9160 0.0317 3.8400e003 185.8520
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
41328 3.5919 6.2000e004 7.0000e- 005 3.6297
Discount Club 1.91141e
+006
166.1263 0.0286 3.4700e003 167.8751
Gasoline/Service
Station
38896.5 3.3806 5.8000e004 7.0000e- 005 3.4162
Parking Lot 124460 10.8172 1.8600e003 2.3000e- 004 10.9310 Total 183.9160 0.0317 3.8400e003 185.8520
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Unmitigated 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222

0.1817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7641 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.9000e004 1.0000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Total 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7641 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.9000e004 1.0000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Total 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 18.2653 0.6132 0.0147 37.9717
Unmitigated 18.2653 0.6132 0.0147 37.9717

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

0.451589 /

0.276781

0.4398 0.0148 3.5000e004 0.9144
Discount Club 17.8767 /

10.9567

17.4115 0.5845 0.0140 36.1967
Gasoline/Service
Station

0.42502 /

0.260496

0.4140 0.0139 3.3000e004 0.8606
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 18.2653 0.6132 0.0147 37.9717
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

0.451589 /

0.276781

0.4398 0.0148 3.5000e004 0.9144
Discount Club 17.8767 /

10.9567

17.4115 0.5845 0.0140 36.1967
Gasoline/Service
Station

0.42502 /

0.260496

0.4140 0.0139 3.3000e004 0.8606
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 18.2653 0.6132 0.0147 37.9717
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Unmitigated 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

18.34 3.7229 0.2200 0.0000 9.2232
Discount Club 1037.93 210.6904 12.4515 0.0000 521.9766
Gasoline/Service
Station

17.25 3.5016 0.2069 0.0000 8.6751
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

18.34 3.7229 0.2200 0.0000 9.2232
Discount Club 1037.93 210.6904 12.4515 0.0000 521.9766
Gasoline/Service
Station

17.25 3.5016 0.2069 0.0000 8.6751
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 21 Date: 1/24/2022 1:27 PM Costco Fresno (Project) Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project-specific values (RPS emission factor)Land Use - Project-specific valuesConstruction Phase - Operational emissions onlyOff-road Equipment - Operational emissions onlyVehicle Trips - Project-specific values, mobile emissions calculated seperatelyConsumer Products - Updated emission factor for consumer products to refine the VOC emissions based on recent CARB regulations.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Gasoline/Service Station 32.00 Pump 1.33 4,517.60 0
Automobile Care Center 4.80 1000sqft 0.11 4,800.00 0
Discount Club 241.34 1000sqft 5.54 241,340.00 0
Parking Lot 889.00 Space 15.55 355,600.00 0

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Rural3
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Operational Year 2030
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
130.13 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/26/2023 4/30/2023
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 1.62E-05
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 1.33tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.00 15.55 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 203.98 130.13tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 53.75 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 182.17 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 33.67 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 166.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 41.80 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 172.01 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Highest

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Energy 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 271.8415 271.8415 0.0345 6.5300e- 003 274.6507 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 217.9149 0.0000 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9496 8.3641 14.3137 0.6132 0.0147 34.0200 Total 0.9616 0.1351 0.1241 8.1000e004 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 223.8644 280.2265 504.0909 13.5261 0.0212 848.5677 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Energy 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 271.8415 271.8415 0.0345 6.5300e- 003 274.6507 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 217.9149 0.0000 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9496 8.3641 14.3137 0.6132 0.0147 34.0200 Total 0.9616 0.1351 0.1241 8.1000e004 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 223.8644 280.2265 504.0909 13.5261 0.0212 848.5677 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction DetailConstruction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2023 4/30/2023 5 0
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionOffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 15.55 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Automobile Care Center 0.00 0.00 0.00
Discount Club 0.00 0.00 0.00
Gasoline/Service Station 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 14.70 6.60 6.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 21 51 28 Discount Club 14.70 6.60 6.60 16.70 64.30 19.00 45 40 15 Gasoline/Service Station 14.70 6.60 6.60 2.00 79.00 19.00 14 27 59 Parking Lot 14.70 6.60 6.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.542478 0.054482 0.176258 0.134700 0.021641 0.005926 0.015139 0.022678 0.000679 0.000278 0.021974 0.001325 0.002442 Discount Club 0.542478 0.054482 0.176258 0.134700 0.021641 0.005926 0.015139 0.022678 0.000679 0.000278 0.021974 0.001325 0.002442 Gasoline/Service Station 0.542478 0.054482 0.176258 0.134700 0.021641 0.005926 0.015139 0.022678 0.000679 0.000278 0.021974 0.001325 0.002442 Parking Lot 0.542478 0.054482 0.176258 0.134700 0.021641 0.005926 0.015139 0.022678 0.000679 0.000278 0.021974 0.001325 0.002442

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 124.9047 124.9047 0.0317 3.8400e003 126.8407 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 124.9047 124.9047 0.0317 3.8400e003 126.8407 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.6900e- 003 147.8100 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.6900e- 003 147.8100

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0138 0.1255 0.1054 7.5000e004 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 0.0000 136.6443 136.6443 2.6200e- 003 2.5100e- 003 137.4563 Gasoline/Service
Station
93514.3 5.0000e004 4.5800e- 003 3.8500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.9903 4.9903 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.0199 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.7000e- 003 147.8100 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0138 0.1255 0.1054 7.5000e004 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 0.0000 136.6443 136.6443 2.6200e- 003 2.5100e- 003 137.4563 Gasoline/Service
Station
93514.3 5.0000e004 4.5800e- 003 3.8500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.9903 4.9903 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.0199 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.7000e- 003 147.8100 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
41328 2.4394 6.2000e004 7.0000e- 005 2.4772
Discount Club 1.91141e
+006
112.8230 0.0286 3.4700e003 114.5718
Gasoline/Service
Station
38896.5 2.2959 5.8000e004 7.0000e- 005 2.3315
Parking Lot 124460 7.3464 1.8600e003 2.3000e- 004 7.4602 Total 124.9047 0.0317 3.8400e003 126.8407
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
41328 2.4394 6.2000e004 7.0000e- 005 2.4772
Discount Club 1.91141e
+006
112.8230 0.0286 3.4700e003 114.5718
Gasoline/Service
Station
38896.5 2.2959 5.8000e004 7.0000e- 005 2.3315
Parking Lot 124460 7.3464 1.8600e003 2.3000e- 004 7.4602 Total 124.9047 0.0317 3.8400e003 126.8407
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Unmitigated 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222

0.1817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7641 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.8000e004 1.0000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Total 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7641 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.8000e004 1.0000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Total 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 14.3137 0.6132 0.0147 34.0200
Unmitigated 14.3137 0.6132 0.0147 34.0200

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

0.451589 /

0.276781

0.3447 0.0148 3.5000e004 0.8192
Discount Club 17.8767 /

10.9567

13.6446 0.5845 0.0140 32.4298
Gasoline/Service
Station

0.42502 /

0.260496

0.3244 0.0139 3.3000e004 0.7710
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 14.3137 0.6132 0.0147 34.0200
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

0.451589 /

0.276781

0.3447 0.0148 3.5000e004 0.8192
Discount Club 17.8767 /

10.9567

13.6446 0.5845 0.0140 32.4298
Gasoline/Service
Station

0.42502 /

0.260496

0.3244 0.0139 3.3000e004 0.7710
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 14.3137 0.6132 0.0147 34.0200
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Unmitigated 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

18.34 3.7229 0.2200 0.0000 9.2232
Discount Club 1037.93 210.6904 12.4515 0.0000 521.9766
Gasoline/Service
Station

17.25 3.5016 0.2069 0.0000 8.6751
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

18.34 3.7229 0.2200 0.0000 9.2232
Discount Club 1037.93 210.6904 12.4515 0.0000 521.9766
Gasoline/Service
Station

17.25 3.5016 0.2069 0.0000 8.6751
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:38 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2030 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation
Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Project-specific values (RPS emission factor)Land Use - Project-specific valuesConstruction Phase - Operational emissions onlyOff-road Equipment - Operational emissions onlyVehicle Trips - Project-specific values, mobile emissions calculated seperatelyConsumer Products - Updated emission factor for consumer products to refine the VOC emissions based on recent CARB regulations.

1.2 Other Project CharacteristicsUrbanizationClimate Zone Rural3
Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days) 2.2 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data1.0 Project CharacteristicsUtility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company Operational Year 2035
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

86.75 0.033 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/26/2023 4/30/2023
tblConsumerProducts ROG_EF 2.14E-05 1.62E-05
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.10 1.33tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.00 15.55 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 203.98 86.75tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 53.75 0.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 182.17 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 33.67 0.00tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 166.88 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 41.80 0.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 172.01 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Highest

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Energy 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 230.2034 230.2034 0.0345 6.5300e- 003 233.0126 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 217.9149 0.0000 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9496 5.5759 11.5254 0.6132 0.0147 31.2318 Total 0.9616 0.1351 0.1240 8.1000e004 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 223.8644 235.8002 459.6646 13.5261 0.0212 804.1414 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Energy 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 230.2034 230.2034 0.0345 6.5300e- 003 233.0126 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 217.9149 0.0000 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9496 5.5759 11.5254 0.6132 0.0147 31.2318 Total 0.9616 0.1351 0.1240 8.1000e004 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0103 223.8644 235.8002 459.6646 13.5261 0.0212 804.1414 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures ConstructionOffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 0.00 0.00 16.80 6.60
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0Acres of Paving: 15.55 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.553747 0.055870 0.176952 0.125831 0.019734 0.005457 0.015107 0.021893 0.000653 0.000272 0.021077 0.001181 0.002226 Discount Club 0.553747 0.055870 0.176952 0.125831 0.019734 0.005457 0.015107 0.021893 0.000653 0.000272 0.021077 0.001181 0.002226 Gasoline/Service Station 0.553747 0.055870 0.176952 0.125831 0.019734 0.005457 0.015107 0.021893 0.000653 0.000272 0.021077 0.001181 0.002226 Parking Lot 0.553747 0.055870 0.176952 0.125831 0.019734 0.005457 0.015107 0.021893 0.000653 0.000272 0.021077 0.001181 0.002226

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 83.2666 83.2666 0.0317 3.8400e003 85.2026 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 83.2666 83.2666 0.0317 3.8400e003 85.2026 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.6900e- 003 147.8100 NaturalGasUnmitigated

0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.6900e- 003 147.8100

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0138 0.1255 0.1054 7.5000e004 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 0.0000 136.6443 136.6443 2.6200e- 003 2.5100e- 003 137.4563 Gasoline/Service
Station
93514.3 5.0000e004 4.5800e- 003 3.8500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.9903 4.9903 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.0199 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.7000e- 003 147.8100 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0138 0.1255 0.1054 7.5000e004 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 9.5400e- 003 0.0000 136.6443 136.6443 2.6200e- 003 2.5100e- 003 137.4563 Gasoline/Service
Station
93514.3 5.0000e004 4.5800e- 003 3.8500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.9903 4.9903 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.0199 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0149 0.1350 0.1134 8.1000e004 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 146.9368 146.9368 2.8200e- 003 2.7000e- 003 147.8100 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
41328 1.6262 6.2000e004 7.0000e- 005 1.6640
Discount Club 1.91141e
+006

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center
41328 1.6262 6.2000e004 7.0000e- 005 1.6640
Discount Club 1.91141e
+006

75.2125 0.0286 3.4700e003 76.9612
Gasoline/Service
Station
38896.5 1.5306 5.8000e004 7.0000e- 005 1.5661
Parking Lot 124460 4.8974 1.8600e003 2.3000e- 004 5.0113 Total 83.2666 0.0317 3.8400e003 85.2026
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Unmitigated 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222

0.1817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7641 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.8000e004 1.0000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Total 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1817 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7641 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.8000e004 1.0000e- 004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Total 0.9467 1.0000e004 0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0209 0.0209 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0222 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 11.5254 0.6132 0.0147 31.2318
Unmitigated 11.5254 0.6132 0.0147 31.2318

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

0.451589 /

0.276781

0.2775 0.0148 3.5000e004 0.7521
Discount Club 17.8767 /

10.9567

10.9867 0.5845 0.0140 29.7718
Gasoline/Service
Station

0.42502 /

0.260496

0.2612 0.0139 3.3000e004 0.7078
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 11.5254 0.6132 0.0147 31.2318
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

0.451589 /

0.276781

0.2775 0.0148 3.5000e004 0.7521
Discount Club 17.8767 /

10.9567

10.9867 0.5845 0.0140 29.7718
Gasoline/Service
Station

0.42502 /

0.260496

0.2612 0.0139 3.3000e004 0.7078
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 11.5254 0.6132 0.0147 31.2318
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Unmitigated 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Category/Year8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

18.34 3.7229 0.2200 0.0000 9.2232
Discount Club 1037.93 210.6904 12.4515 0.0000 521.9766
Gasoline/Service
Station

17.25 3.5016 0.2069 0.0000 8.6751
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Automobile Care
Center

18.34 3.7229 0.2200 0.0000 9.2232
Discount Club 1037.93 210.6904 12.4515 0.0000 521.9766
Gasoline/Service
Station

17.25 3.5016 0.2069 0.0000 8.6751
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 217.9149 12.8784 0.0000 539.8748
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 20 Date: 7/26/2022 7:52 PM Costco Fresno (Project) 2035 Operation - Fresno County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Costco Commercial Center
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report
Fresno, California
Ramboll

APPENDIX B

OPERATIONAL MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
Table B-1a. Trip Lengths and Vehicle Miles Traveled by Operational Mobile Sources (Herndon/Riverside) Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Average
One-Way Trip
Length1,2
Peak Daily Trips
(one-way
trips/day)3
Peak Daily
VMT4
Annual Average
Trips (one-way
trips/yr)
Annual
Average VMT
Primary 17.3 10,046 173,528 3,666,790 63,337,720
Diverted 1.0 4,038 4,119 1,473,870 1,503,435
Pass-By 0.1 3,788 379 1,382,620 138,262
Warehouse, Fuel Station, and Car Wash
Employee Vehicles Primary 30.7 300 9,210 109,500 3,361,650 MDO Driver and Warehouse Employee
Vehicles Primary 30.7 136 4,175 49,640 1,523,875
MDO Delivery Trucks Primary 81.5 20 1,630 7,300 594,950 Fuel Delivery Trucks Primary 125.0 14 1,750 5,110 638,750 Warehouse Delivery Trucks Primary 125.0 26 3,250 9,490 1,186,250 Notes:

Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel
MDO - market delivery operation
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
4 Peak daily VMT based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates or estimated as a product of average trip length and number of trips presented in this table.

Trip Type
Member Vehicles
1 Average trip lengths for primary and diverted trip types are based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates. Pass-by trip length for member vehicles is assumed to be equal to the CalEEMod® default trip length of 0.1 miles. 3 Peak daily trips are based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates. 2 Average trip length for MDO delivery trucks provided by Costco. The average routed round trip length for Fresno MDO delivery trucks is 163 miles.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-1b. Trip Lengths and Vehicle Miles Traveled by Operational Mobile Sources (4500 W. Shaw Avenue)
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Peak Daily Trips
(one-way
trips/day)1
Peak Daily
VMT2
Annual Average
Trips (one-way
trips/yr)
Annual Average
VMT
Primary 1,363 58,264 497,495 21,266,360
Pass-by 48 0 17,520 0
Diverted 2,099 3,442 766,135 1,256,330
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel
MDO - market delivery operation
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
2 Peak daily VMT based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates or estimated as a product of average trip length and number of trips presented in this table.

Trip Type
1 Peak daily trips are based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates.

Passenger Vehicles

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-2. Operational Mobile Source Fleet Mixes
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Fleet Mix
CalEEMod®
Default1
Gas 12,057,533 52.8% 55.0%
Phe 351,337 1.54% 1.6%
Elec 514,390 2.25% 0%
Dsl 22,675 0.10% 0%
Gas 1,013,826 5.88% 5.9%
Phe 1,027 0.01% 0.0%
Elec 1,049 0.01% 0%
Dsl 250 0.00% 0%
Gas 5,488,159 19.29% 19.4%
Phe 39,774 0.14% 0.1%
Elec 17,710 0.06% 0%
Dsl 14,595 0.05% 0%
Gas 4,629,686 17.47% 17.8%
Phe 29,118 0.11% 0.1%
Elec 19,405 0.07% 0%
Dsl 71,606 0.27% 0%
LHD1 All 2.7% -- -- --
LHD2 All 0.7% -- -- --
MHD All 1.4% -- -- --
HHDT All 2.2% -- -- --
OBUS All 0.1% -- -- --
UBUS All 0.0% -- -- --
MCY All 2.4% -- -- --
SBUS All 0.2% -- -- --
MH All 0.3% -- -- --
Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel MDV - medium-duty vehicle EMFAC - EMission FACtors model MH - motor homes
HHDT - Heavy heavy-duty truck MHD - medium heavy-duty trucks LDA - light duty automobiles OBUS - other buses
LDT - light-duty trucks SBUS - school buses
LHD - light heavy-duty trucks UBUS - urban buses
MCY - motorcycles VMT - vehicle miles traveled

17.6%

16.1%
Notes:

Fuel Type

EMFAC VMT
Output2
(miles/day)
Employee Vehicle
Fleet Mix3
Member Vehicle
Fleet Mix4
1 CalEEMod® default for Fresno County calendar year 2023. 2 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 for default emissions activity. 3 Fleet mix for employee vehicles estimated based on the ratio of the vehicle classes in CalEEMod® default fleet mix and the EMFAC2021 VMT output.
4 Fleet mix for member vehicles visiting the Costco Gas Station are estimated based on the ratio of the vehicle classes in CalEEMod® default fleet mix and the EMFAC2021 VMT output. Vehicles are assumed to be gasoline or plug-in hybrid.

Vehicle
Category
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV

51.0%

5.3%

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-3. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Running Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA Gas 12,057,533 3,843 0.06 0.03
LDA Phe 351,337 53 0.00 0.00
LDA Elec 514,390 0 0.00 0.00
LDA Dsl 22,675 6 0.00 0.00
LDT1 Gas 1,013,826 388 0.01 0.01
LDT1 Phe 1,027 0 0.00 0.00
LDT1 Elec 1,049 0 0.00 0.00
LDT1 Dsl 250 0 0.00 0.00
LDT2 Gas 5,488,159 2,188 0.04 0.02
LDT2 Phe 39,774 6 0.00 0.00
LDT2 Elec 17,710 0 0.00 0.00
LDT2 Dsl 14,595 5 0.00 0.00
MDV Gas 4,629,686 2,265 0.05 0.02
MDV Phe 29,118 4 0.00 0.00
MDV Elec 19,405 0 0.00 0.00
MDV Dsl 71,606 32 0.01 0.00
HHDT Dsl 2,030,441 3,590 0.57 0.00
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA 289 0.005 0.002
LDA 136 0.001 0.000
LDA 0 0.000 0.000
LDA 231 0.036 0.001
LDT1 347 0.013 0.009
LDT1 124 0.001 0.000
LDT1 0 0.000 0.000
LDT1 401 0.063 0.012
LDT2 362 0.007 0.003
LDT2 129 0.001 0.000
LDT2 0 0.000 0.000
LDT2 307 0.048 0.001
MDV 444 0.009 0.005
MDV 136 0.001 0.000
MDV 0 0.000 0.000
MDV 412 0.065 0.001
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class Fuel

EMFAC VMT
Output1
(miles/day)
EMFAC Emissions Output1
Passenger Vehicles
Delivery Trucks2
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class
Running Exhaust Emission Factors3
(grams/mile)
Passenger Vehicles
Dsl
Fuel
Gas
Phe
Gas
Phe
Gas
Phe
Gas
Phe
Elec
Dsl
Elec
Dsl
Elec
Dsl
Elec

Page 1 of 2 ends

Table B-3. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Running Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class
Running Exhaust Emission Factors3
(grams/mile)
Fuel
331 0.006 0.003
324 0.006 0.003
HHDT 1604.00 0.25 0.00
Notes:

Abbreviations:

Delivery Trucks2
1 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 for default emissions activity. 2 Delivery trucks are assumed to be diesel-fueled.

Dsl
Member Vehicle Emission Factor4
Employee Vehicle Emission Factor4

Page 2 of 2 ends

Table B-4. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Starting Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA Gas 1,459,129 115.4 0.1 0.119
LDA Phe 31,224 2.29 0.0 0.001
LDA Elec 56,838 0 0 0
LDA Dsl 3,207 0 0 0
LDT1 Gas 135,565 13.9 0.0 0.021
LDT1 Phe 83 0.0066 0.000 0.0
LDT1 Elec 118 0 0 0
LDT1 Dsl 62 0 0 0
LDT2 Gas 657,946 66.5 0.0 0.067
LDT2 Phe 3,337 0.290 0.0 0.000
LDT2 Elec 2,516 0 0 0
LDT2 Dsl 1,661 0 0 0
MDV Gas 598,810 75.1 0.0 0.081
MDV Phe 2,568 0.3 0.0 0.000
MDV Elec 2,761 0 0 0
MDV Dsl 8,640 0 0 0
HHDT Dsl 237,288 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA 71.73 0.03 0.0742
LDA 66.44 0.02 0.0416
LDA 0 0 0
LDA 0 0 0
LDT1 93.34 0.04 0.1408
LDT1 72.34 0.02 0.0416
LDT1 0 0 0
LDT1 0 0 0
LDT2 91.64 0.04 0.0925
LDT2 78.85 0.02 0.0416
LDT2 0 0 0
LDT2 0 0 0
MDV 113.71 0.05 0.1229
MDV 99.36 0.02 0.0416
MDV 0 0 0
MDV 0 0 0
84 0.038 0.090
82 0.037 0.087
Member Vehicle Weighted Emission
Factor4
Employee Vehicle Weighted Emission
Factor4
Phe
Elec
Dsl
Dsl
EMFAC Emissions Output1
(tons/day)
Passenger Vehicles
Delivery Trucks2
Starting Exhaust Emission Factors3
(grams/trip)
Passenger Vehicles
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class Fuel
EMFAC Vehicle
Trips Output1
(trips/day)
Vehicle
Class Fuel
Gas
Phe
Elec
Elec
Dsl
Gas
Gas
Dsl
Gas
Phe
Phe
Elec

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-4. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Starting Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
Starting Exhaust Emission Factors3
Vehicle (grams/trip)
Class Fuel
HHDT 0.0 0.0 0.0
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane LDT - Light-Duty Truck
CO2 - carbon dioxide HHDT - Heavy-Heavy Duty truck
Dsl - Diesel MDV - medium-duty vehicle
Elec - Electric N2O - nitrous oxide
EMFAC - EMission FACtors model Phe - Plug-in hybrid
LDA - Light Duty Automobile VMT - vehicle miles traveled Conversion Factor:
907184.74 grams per ton
Delivery Trucks2
Dsl
1 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 for default emissions activity. 2 Delivery trucks are assumed to be diesel-fueled.
3 Emission factors for EMFAC vehicle classes are estimated as a ratio of the EMFAC emissions output and EMFAC VMT output.
4 Emission factors for EMFAC vehicle classes are weighted based on the project-specific fleet mix in Table B-2 to estimate trip-based emission factors for passenger vehicles.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-5. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Idling Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA Gas 27.7 0 0.0007
LDA Phe 17.1 0 0.0002
LDA Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
LDA Dsl 25.1 0 0.0006
LDT1 Gas 33.2 0 0.0023
LDT1 Phe 15.5 0 0.0002
LDT1 Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
LDT1 Dsl 43.0 0 0.0023
LDT2 Gas 34.9 0 0.0009
LDT2 Phe 16.1 0 0.0002
LDT2 Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
LDT2 Dsl 32.9 0 0.0005
MDV Gas 43.1 0 0.0013
MDV Phe 16.9 0 0.0002
MDV Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
MDV Dsl 41.6 0 0.0004

32.0 0 0.0009

31.3 0 0.0009
HHDT Dsl 224.0 0 0.0021
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane LDT - Light-Duty Truck
CO2 - carbon dioxide HHDT - Heavy-Heavy Duty truck
Dsl - Diesel MDV - medium-duty vehicle
Elec - Electric N2O - nitrous oxide
EMFAC - EMission FACtors model Phe - Plug-in hybrid
LDA - Light Duty Automobile VMT - vehicle miles traveled mph - miles per hour
Conversion Factor:
60 minutes per hour
EMFAC Vehicle
Class
Idling Emission Factors1
(grams/idle-minute)
Passenger Vehicles
Fuel
Delivery Trucks3
1 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 project-level output. Passenger vehicle emission rates are equivalent to the running exhaust emission rate in grams per mile at 5 mph, multiplied by the speed correction factor of 2.5 mph. 3 Delivery trucks are assumed to be diesel-fueled.
2 Emission factors for EMFAC vehicle classes are weighted based on the project-specific fleet mix in Table B-2 to estimate trip-based emission factors for passenger vehicles.

Employee Vehicle Weighted
Emission Factor2
Member Vehicle Weighted
Emission Factor2

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-6a. Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates for Operational Mobile Sources (Herndon/Riverside) Costco Commercial CenterFresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4 CO2e5
Primary 17.3 3,666,790 63,337,720 -- 21,293 0.54 0.54 21,468.0 Diverted 1.0 1,473,870 1,503,435 -- 622.32 0.07 0.14 645.2 Pass-By 0.10 1,382,620 138,262 -- 162.36 0.05 0.12 181.3 Warehouse, Fuel Station, and Car Wash
Employee Vehicles Primary 30.7 109,500 3,361,650 -- 1,099 0.03 0.02 1,106.9 MDO Driver and Warehouse Employee
Vehicles Primary 30.70 49,640 1,523,875 -- 498 0.01 0.01 501.8 MDO Delivery Trucks Primary 81.5 7,300 594,950 18,250 958 0.15 0.00 1,003.2 Fuel Delivery Trucks Primary 125.0 5,110 638,750 12,775 1,027 0.16 0.00 1,075.5 Warehouse Delivery Trucks Primary 125.0 9,490 1,186,250 23,725 1,908 0.30 0.00 1,997.4 Member Vehicle Idling at Gasoline Dispensing
Facility Primary -- -- -- 33,638,400 1,076 0.00 0.03 1,076.5 28,643 1.31 0.86 29,056
Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane N2O - nitrous oxide
CO2 - carbon dioxide VMT - vehicle miles traveled
MT - metric tonnes yr - year
Mobile Source Activity
Member Vehicles
Trip Type
Idle
Duration2,3
(minutes/
year)
GHG Emissions4
(MT/yr)
Trip
Distance1
(miles)
Annual
Average
Trips1
(one-way
trips/year)
Annual
Average VMT1
(miles/year)
3 Delivery truck idle duration is 5 minutes based on the CARB Air Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/atcm-to-limit-vehicle-idling/about. Accessed: September 2021. For GDF idling this is actually idling duration in units of minutes per year.4 GHG emissions include running exhaust, starting exhaust, and idling exhaust. Emissions were estimated using emission factors from Tables B-3, B-4, and B-5 along with annual VMT, annual trips, and idle duration.
5 CO2e was estimated using the global warming potentials of CO2, CH4, and N2O, which are 1, 25, and 298 respectively.

Total Emissions
Notes
1 Data obtained from Table B-1a.2 Idle duration for passenger vehicles visiting the gas station is estimated using a maximum queue length of 3 vehicles per queue lane and a transaction time of 4 minutes per vehicle. The queue is assumed to stay constant while the gas station is open (6 AM to 10 PM), 7 days/week. Queue length is based on Saturday midday peak hour average queue length projectionsfrom existing Costco facilities provided by Kittelson & Associates.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-6b. Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates for Operational Mobile Sources (4500 W. Shaw Avenue) Costco Commercial Center Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4 CO2e3
Primary 497,495 21,266,360 7,087 0.15 0.11 7,136
Pass-by 17,520 0 1.48 0.00 0.00 1.7
Diverted 766,135 1,256,330 481 0.04 0.07 494
7,570 0.19 0.19 7,632
Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane N2O - nitrous oxide
CO2 - carbon dioxide VMT - vehicle miles traveled
MT - metric tonnes yr - yearNotes
1 Data obtained from Table B-1b.2 GHG emissions include running exhaust and starting exhaust. Emissions were estimated using emission factors from Tables B-3 and B-4 along with annual VMT and annual trips.
3 CO2e was estimated using the global warming potentials of CO2, CH4, and N2O, which are 1, 25, and 298, respectively.

GHG Emissions2
(MT/yr)
Passenger Vehicles
Annual
Average VMT1
(miles/year)
Total Emissions
Mobile Source Activity Trip Type
Annual
Average
Trips1
(one-way
trips/year)

Page 1 of 1 ends

Costco Commercial Center
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report
Fresno, California
Confidential

APPENDIX C

GHG CONSISTENCY
Table C-1. Consistency with 2022 CARB Scoping Plan Update Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Priority Areas Priority GHG Reduction Strategies Consistency Convert local government fleets to ZEVs and provide EV charging at public sites Create a jurisdiction-specific ZEV ecosystem to support deployment of ZEVs statewide (such as building standards that exceed state building codes, permit streamlining, infrastructure siting, consumer education, preferential parking policies, and ZEV readiness plans) Reduce or eliminate minimum parking standards
Implement Complete Streets policies and investments, consistent with general plan circulation element requirements
Increase access to public transit by increasing density of development near transit, improving transit service by increasing service frequency, creating bus priority lanes, reducing or eliminating fares, microtransit, etc.

Increase public access to clean mobility options by planning for and investing in electric shuttles, bike share, car share, and walking
Implement parking pricing or transportation demand management pricing strategies Amend zoning or development codes to enable mixed-use, walkable, transit-oriented, and compact infill development (such as increasing the allowable density of a neighborhood) Preserve natural and working lands by implementing land use policies that guide development toward infill areas and do not convert “greenfield” land to urban uses (e.g., green belts, strategic conservation easements)
Adopt all-electric new construction reach codes for residential and commercial uses Adopt policies and incentive programs to implement energy efficiency retrofits for existing buildings, such as weatherization, lighting upgrades, and replacing energy-intensive appliances and equipment with more efficient systems (such as Energy Star-rated equipment and equipment controllers)
Adopt policies and incentive programs to electrify all appliances and equipment in existing buildings such as appliance rebates, existing building reach codes, or time of sale electrification ordinances Facilitate deployment of renewable energy production and distribution and energy storage on privately owned land uses (e.g., permit streamlining, information sharing) Deploy renewable energy production and energy storage directly in new public projects and on existing public facilities (e.g., solar photovoltaic systems on rooftops of municipal buildings and on canopies in public parking lots, battery storage systems in municipal buildings) Abbreviations:

CalGreen - California Green Building Standards Code
CARB - California Air Resources Board
EV - electric vehicle
GHG - greenhouse gas
PG&E - Pacific Gas & Electric
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
ZEV - zero emission vehicle
Transportation Electrification
VMT Reduction
Building Decarbonization
Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project. The Project also includes a redesignation from Expressway Area to Superarterial, which allows for multiple modes of travel traffic, including pedestrian and bikes. This could lead to further development of these types of nonvehicular facilities, including bike lanes and sidewalks, which are not currently allowed under the Expressway Area designation.

In addition, the Project plans to encourage employee commute trip reduction through a variety of strategies. The project will provide carpool incentives, partner with local agencies to provide vanpool services, subsidize transit passes and provide bicycle storage and locker rooms for employees who bike to work. This will reduce the employee VMT and provide incentives for employees to commute to work alternative ways.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project includes an EV parking requirement and includes 45 installed EV spaces.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project plans to use PG&E's Solar Choice program, which provides 100% solar energy to customers. In addition, to the extent applicable to the Project, the Project would meet the CalGreen Building Standards Code in effect at the time of building permit application, which would include a number of energy saving requirements.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table C-2. Consistency with Fresno Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
# Goal Policy Consistency Analysis
Encourage and prioritize full, fair, and equitable
participation by all affected communities in transportation decision-making and planning processes.

Actively work to ensure equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of transportation projects.

Promote the improvement and expansion of accessible transportation options to serve the needs of all residents, especially those who have historically faced disproportionate transportation burdens.

Encourage alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions.

Support investment in and promotion of active transportation and transit to improve public health and mobility, especially in historically underinvested areas.

Encourage sustainable development that focuses growth near activity centers and mobility options that achieve greater location efficiency.

Support local jurisdictions’ efforts to minimize the loss of farmland, environmentally sensitive areas, and natural resources
Support local jurisdictions’ efforts to facilitate the development of diverse housing choices for all income groups.

Facilitate and promote interagency coordination and consistency across planning efforts.

Incentivize and support efforts to improve air quality and minimize pollutants from transportation.

Prioritize investment in and promote multimodal safety measures to reduce traffic fatalities and incidents in the region.

Promote enhanced Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce congestion and vehicle miles traveled.

Encourage improvements in travel connections across all modes to create an integrated, accessible, and seamless transportation network.

Maximize the cost-effectiveness of transportation improvements.

Encourage investments that increase the system’s resilience to extreme weather events, natural disasters, and pandemics.

Preserve and maintain existing multimodal transportation assets in a state of good repair Support local and regional economic development by leveraging planning and transportation funds that foster public and private investment.

Facilitate efficient, reliable, resilient, and sustainable goods movement.

Support innovative mobility solutions that are accessible, affordable, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve air quality.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project would be located nearby to transit stops and thus would allow for utilization of existing transit facilities to visit the Project. In addition, the Project includes an EV parking requirement and includes 45 installed EV spaces.

Support efforts to expand broadband access throughout the region. Not Applicable.

Abbreviations:

EV - electric vehicle
NW - northwest
TDM - Transportation Demand Management
TSM - Transportation Systems Management
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project will facilitate goods movement to the Fresno area and provide approximately 165 to 175 jobs. 1 Improved mobility and accessibility for all
Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, it is envisioned that Project's location will provide convenient access for nearby residences for additional retail shopping experiences. In addition, the project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project, and will be located in close proximity to transit stops (e.g., NW Herndon-Hayes transit stop).

Consistent. Per the Transportation Impact Analysis, the Project would be consistent with the applicable plans, policies, and programs and would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.

The Project plans to encourage commute trip reduction through a variety of strategies. The Project will provide carpool incentives, partner with local agencies to provide vanpool services, subsidize transit passes and provide bicycle storage and locker rooms for employees who bike to work. This will reduce the employee VMT and provide incentives for employees to commute to work alternative ways.

The Project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project. In addition, the Project would be located nearby to transit stops and thus would allow for utilization of existing transit facilities to visit the Project.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project includes a redesignation from Expressway Area to Superarterial, which allows for multiple modes of travel traffic, including pedestrian and bikes. This could lead to further development of these types of non-vehicular facilities, including bike lanes and sidewalks, which are not currently allowed under the Expressway Area designation.

In addition, the project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project. The Project will be located nearby transit facilities such as the NW Herndon-Hayes transit stop, thus allowing for alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle visits to the Project that would support efforts to improve air quality and minimize pollutants from transportation.

A region embracing clean transportation,
technology, and innovation 5
Vibrant communities that are accessible by
sustainable transportation options 2
A safe, well-maintained, efficient, and climateresilient multimodal transportation network 3 A transportation network that supports a
sustainable and vibrant economy 4

Page 1 of 1 ends

3. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan Update - CEQA Project Consistency Checklist GHG Reduction Plan Update consistency review involves the evaluation of project consistency with the applicable strategies of the GHG Reduction Plan Update. The GHG reduction strategies identified in the GHG Reduction Plan Update relies upon the General Plan and additional local measures as the basis of the development related strategies to reduce GHG emissions. This checklist is developed based on the key local GHG reduction strategies and actions identified in the GHG Reduction Plan Update that are applicable to proposed development projects. Note that not all strategies listed below will apply to all projects. For example, not all projects will meet mixed-use related policies of the General Plan, because not all projects are required to be mixed use.

Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable (NA) Explanation
1: Land Use and Transportation Demand Strategies a. Does the project include mixed-use, development? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, mixed-use development is defined as pedestrian-friendlydevelopment that blends two or more residential, commercial, cultural, orinstitutional, uses, one of which must be residential Policy UF-1-c, LU-3-b,
Objective-UF 12, UF-12-a,
UF-12-b, UF-12-d,
Policy RC-2-a
b. Is the project high density? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, is the project developed at 12 units per acre or higher?
LU-5-f
c. Is the project infill development, pursuant to the General Plan definition of location within the City limits as of December 31, 2012? LU-2-a, Objective-12,
UF-12-a, UF-12-b, UF-12-d
d. Does the project implement pedestrian bicycle, and transit linkages with surrounding land uses and neighborhoods? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, the project must include all sidewalks, paths, trails, and facilities required by the General Plan and Active Transportation Plan, as implemented through the Fresno Municipal Code and project conditions of approval.

Policy UF-1-c, UF-12-e,
Policy RC-2-a, Objective
MT-4,5,6, Policy MT-4-c,
Policy MT-6-a, Policy POSS7-h Objective MT 8, Policies MT-8-a, MT-8-b
e. If the project includes mixed-use or high density development, is it located within ½ mile of a High Quality Transit Area as defined in the City’s CEQA Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled? Or, is the project located within 500feet of an existing or planned transit stop? Policy UF-12-a,
UF-12-b, LU-3-b, Objective
MT 8, Policies MT-8-a,
MT-8-b
f. Will the project accommodate a large employer (over 100 employees) and will it implement trip reduction programs such as increasing transit use,carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, or other measures to reduce vehicle milestraveled pursuant to San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Rule 9410?See the SJVAPCD website for details: https://www.valleyair.org/rules/currntrules/r9410.pdf Policy MT-8-b, Objective
MT-9, Policy MT-10-c, San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District Rule 9410
NANA
NA The project is not a mixed-use
or high density developmentThe project is not a mixed-use development as it does not include residential development.

The project is not high density.
yes
The project implements pedestrian, bicycle, and transit linkages to surrounding land uses and neighborhoods consistent with Fresno's General Plan and Active Transportation Plan. yes
The project will implement trip reduction programs to encourage carpooling and other measures to reduce employee VMT. yes
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable (NA) Explanation
g. If the project includes modifications to the transportation network, do those improvements meet the requirements of the City of Fresno’s CompleteStreets Policy, adopted in October 2019? According to the policy, a complete street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users - including bicyclists,pedestrians, transit vehicles, trucks, and motorists - appropriate to thefunction and context of the facility while connecting to a larger transportation network.See City of Fresno website for details: https://www.fresno.gov/publicworks/wpcontent/uploads/sites/17/2019/10/Complete-Streets-091119.pdf MT-1-g, MT-1-h
h. Does the project have a less than significant VMT impact, either through satisfying screening criteria or mitigating VMT impacts, pursuant to the City’sadopted VMT thresholds?See City of Fresno website for details: https://www.fresno.gov/darm/wpcontent/uploads/sites/10/2021/01/CEQA-Guidelines-for-Vehicle-Miles-TraveledFinal-Adopted-Version.pdf MT-2-b, MT-2-c
2: Electric Vehicle Strategies a. For new multi-family dwelling units with parking, does the project provide EV charging spaces capable of supporting future EV supply equipment (EVcapable) at 10% of the parking spaces per 2019 California Green BuildingStandards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.106.4 Policy RC-8-j
b. For new commercial buildings, does project provide EV charging spaces capable of supporting EV capable spaces at 4% to 10% of the parking spacesper 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part11), Section 5.106.5.3 Policy RC-8-j
3: Energy Conservation Strategies a. Does the project meet or exceed mandatory state building energy codes? If yes, does the project follow any other GreenPoint ratings such as LEED,Energy Star or others? If yes, indicate level of certification-Silver, gold,platinum if applicable? Policy RC-5-c, Objective
RC-8, Policy RC 8-a
b. For commercial projects, does the project achieve net zero emissions electricity?Mark NA if project will be permitted before 2030. Mark Yes if voluntary. Add source and capacity in explanation.

Additional Recommended
GHG Plan Measure,
supports Objective RC-8
NA
Of 889 parking spaces, WKHUHZLOOEH LQVWDOOHG(9VSDFHV which is %of the parking spaces (in range).

Project buildout is in 2023.

The project meets mandatory building energy codes; Costco's warehouse designs are consistent with the requirements of LEED.
yes
The project does not consist of multi-family dwelling units. yes
NA
yes
The project includes modifications to the transportation network consistent with the City's Complete Streets Policy. Such improvements include constructing sidewalk along the project frontage, constructing a multi-use path, and installing striping to better delineate the roadway cross section for different users. no The project has a significant VMT impact.

Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable (NA) Explanation
4: Water Conservation Strategies a. Does the project meet or exceed the mandatory outdoor water use measures of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.304? If the project exceeds CalGreen Code mandatory measures provide methods in excess of requirements in the explanation. Examples include outdoor water conservation measures such as; drought tolerant landscaping plants, compliant irrigation systems, xeriscape, replacing turf etc. Provide the conservation measure that the project will include in the explanation.

Objective RC-7,
Policy RC-7-a, RC-7-h
b. Does the project meet or exceed the mandatory indoor water use measures of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.303? If the project exceeds CalGreen Code, mandatory measures provide methods in excess of requirements in the explanation. Examples may include water conserving devices and systems such as water leak detection system, hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves, energy efficient appliances such as Energy Star Certified dishwashers, washing machines, dual flush toilets, point of use and/or tankless water heaters.

Objective RC-7,
Policy RC-7-a, RC-7-e
5: Waste Diversion and Recycling Strategies a. Does the project implement techniques of solid waste segregation, disposal and reduction, such as recycling, composting, waste to energy technology, and/or waste separation, to reduce the volume of solid wastes that must be sent to landfill facilities? Policy PU-9-a, RC-11-a
b. During construction will the project recycle construction and demolition waste?
Policy RC-11-a
c. Does the project provide recycling canisters in public areas where trashcans are also provided?
Policy RC-11-a
Note: The GHG reduction strategies included in this checklist are based on the GHG reduction strategies identified in the Chapter 5 of the GHG Reduction Plan Update. yesyes
The project meets the mandatoryindoor water use measures. Highefficiency restroom fixtures save40% more water.

The project meets themandatory outdoor wateruse measures. yes
Costco prefers full metal buildingsin order to use the maximumamount of recycled material. yes
yes The project will recycle construction and demolition waste.

The project will provide recyclingcanisters.

Appendix G
Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment

$/+5 3DJHRI )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
5LGJH5RXWH'ULYH6XLWH/DJXQD+LOOV&$
S_

I_

)HEUXDU\
.OHLQIHOGHU3URMHFW1R
$
&RVWFR:KROHVDOH

/DNH'ULYH
,VVDTXDK:DVKLQJWRQ

$WWHQWLRQ
0V.LP.DW]
'LUHFWRURI5HDO(VWDWH'HYHORSPHQW
6XEMHFW
/LPLWHG3KDVH,,(QYLURQPHQWDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW5HSRUW 3URSRVHG&RVWFR:DUHKRXVHDQG*DV6WDWLRQ
1(&RUQHURI1RUWK5LYHUVLGH'ULYHDQG:HVW+HUQGRQ$YHQXH )UHVQR)UHVQR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD

1)UHVQR
5LYHUVLGH5HOR:
&:

'HDU0U.DW]

.OHLQIHOGHU LV SOHDVHG WR SURYLGH &RVWFR :KROHVDOH &RUSRUDWLRQ &RVWFR
WKLV /LPLWHG 3KDVH,,
(QYLURQPHQWDO 6LWH $VVHVVPHQW
(6$
5HSRUW FRQFHUQLQJ WKH SURSRVHG &RVWFR ZDUHKRXVH DQG JDVVWDWLRQ
WKH³6LWH´
RQWKHSURSHUW\ORFDWHGDWWKHQRUWKHDVWHUQFRUQHURI:HVW+HUQGRQ$YHQXH DQG1RUWK5LYHUVLGH'ULYHLQWKH&LW\RI)UHVQR)UHVQR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD VHH)LJXUH

,Q VXPPDU\WHQ FRPSRVLWH VRLO VDPSOHV
LQFOXGLQJ RQH GXSOLFDWH
DQGWHQ GLVFUHWH VRLO VDPSOHV

LQFOXGLQJRQHGXSOLFDWH
ZHUH FROOHFWHGGXULQJWKH/LPLWHG3KDVH,,(6$DQGZHUH VXEPLWWHGIRU ODERUDWRU\DQDO\VLVRIRUJDQRFKORULQHSHVWLFLGHV
2&3V
DUVHQLFDQGOHDG7KHDQDO\WLFDO UHVXOWV
ZHUHFRPSDUHGE\.OHLQIHOGHUWRHQYLURQPHQWDODQGKXPDQKHDOWKVFUHHQLQJOHYHOVDQGKD]DUGRXV ZDVWHWKUHVKROGYDOXHV7KHFRPSDULVRQVLQGLFDWHGUHSRUWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRI2&3VDUVHQLFDQG OHDG SUHVHQW LQWKH VRLO VDPSOHV ZHUH EHORZWKHLU UHVSHFWLYH KXPDQ KHDOWK VFUHHQLQJ FULWHULDIRU FRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDO VRLOV DQG EHORZ WKUHVKROGV IRU FODVVLILFDWLRQ DV D &DOLIRUQLDUHJXODWHG RU )HGHUDO 5HVRXUFH &RQVHUYDWLRQ DQG 5HFRYHU\ $FW
5&5$
KD]DUGRXV ZDVWH %DVHG RQ WKH
DQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVQRIXUWKHUDVVHVVPHQWIRU2&3VDQGPHWDOVLVSUHVHQWO\UHFRPPHQGHG %$&.*5281',1)250$7,21
7KH 6LWH FRQVLVWV RI DSSUR[LPDWHO\ DFUHV RI ODQG QRUWKHDVW RI WKH LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI 1RUWK5LYHUVLGH'ULYHDQG:HVW+HUQGRQ$YHQXH7KH6LWHLVORFDWHGRQDSRUWLRQRIRQHSDUFHORI ODQGLGHQWLILHGE\WKH)UHVQR&RXQW\$VVHVVRUDV$VVHVVRU¶V3DUFHO1XPEHU $31

7KH6LWHZDVXVHGDVDQRUFKDUGIURPDWOHDVW
WKURXJK

7KH6LWHKDVEHHQYDFDQWIURP
WRGDWH$QHOHFWULFDOWUDQVPLVVLRQOLQHKDVEHHQSUHVHQWH[WHQGLQJDFURVVWKH6LWHGLDJRQDOO\ IURPWKHQRUWKZHVWFRUQHUWRWKHHDVWHUQVLGHRIWKH6LWHVLQFHDWOHDVW 6WRFNSLOHVRIVRLODQG
GHEULVZHUHYLVLEOHRQWKH
DHULDOSKRWRJUDSK

$/+5 3DJHRI )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
./(,1)(/'(55LGJH5RXWH'ULYH6XLWH/DJXQD+LOOV&$ S_

I_

.OHLQIHOGHU¶VGUDIW3KDVH,(6$GDWHG-DQXDU\LGHQWLILHGWKHKLVWRULFDOXVHRIWKH6LWHDV DQRUFKDUGDVDUHFRJQL]HGHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQFHUQ
5(&
GXHWRWKHSRWHQWLDOSUHVHQFHRIDUVHQLF
DQGOHDGLQVXUIDFHVRLOVDVWKHVHPHWDOVZHUHRIWHQXVHGDVDSHVWLFLGHLQRUFKDUGV.OHLQIHOGHU¶V 3KDVH,(6$UHFRPPHQGHGD/LPLWHG3KDVH,,(6$WRDVVHVVWKHSUHVHQFHRIDUVHQLFOHDGDQG SHVWLFLGHVDQGDVVLVWLQZDVWHFKDUDFWHUL]DWLRQGXULQJSURSRVHGFRQVWUXFWLRQDFWLYLWLHV /,0,7('3+$6(,,(19,5210(17$/6,7($66(660(17
7KH/LPLWHG3KDVH,,(6$VFRSHLQFOXGHGWKHIROORZLQJ +HDOWKDQG6DIHW\3ODQ3UHSDUDWLRQ
3ULRUWRLQLWLDWLRQRIILHOGDFWLYLWLHV.OHLQIHOGHUSUHSDUHGD6LWH6SHFLILF+HDOWKDQG6DIHW\3ODQWKDW LQFOXGHV LQIRUPDWLRQ UHJDUGLQJ SRVVLEOH FKHPLFDO KD]DUGV SK\VLFDO KD]DUGV PRQLWRULQJ HTXLSPHQWDQGFRQWLQJHQF\SODQVIRUHPHUJHQFLHVWKDWPD\DULVHGXULQJILHOGDFWLYLWLHV7KLVSODQ ZDVEDVHGRQWKHJHQHUDONQRZOHGJHRIFKHPLFDOFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIPDWHULDOVOLNHO\SUHVHQWRQWKH 6LWH %DVHG RQ HQYLURQPHQWDO FRQGLWLRQV DFWXDOO\ SUHVHQW /HYHO ' 3URWHFWLRQ ZLWK SHUVRQDO
SURWHFWLYH HTXLSPHQW LQFOXGLQJ JORYHV VWHHOWRH UXEEHU ERRWVKDUG KDW DQG H\H SURWHFWLRQ ZDV
DGHTXDWHIRUSHUIRUPLQJWKHILHOGDFWLYLWLHVGHVFULEHGKHUHLQ 6RLO6DPSOLQJ
,QWRWDO.OHLQIHOGHUFROOHFWHGVRLOVDPSOHVIURPORFDWLRQVGHVLJQDWHG66D EFDQG G WKURXJK66
D
E
FDQG
GDWWKH6LWH6RLOVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGIURPWKHXSSHUVL[LQFKHV RIVRLO.OHLQIHOGHUXVHGDKDQGWURZHOWRFOHDUWKHYHJHWDWLRQIURPHDFKVDPSOHORFDWLRQDQGWKHQ SDFNHGWKHODERUDWRU\SURYLGHGJODVVMDUVE\KDQG7KHJODVVMDUVZHUHWKHQODEHOHGZLWKSHUWLQHQW LQIRUPDWLRQDQGWKHQSURPSWO\SODFHGLQWRD
ZDWHU
LFHFKLOOHGFRROHUIRUWHPSRUDU\VWRUDJH
3ULRUWRWKHFROOHFWLRQRIHDFKVDPSOHWKHKDQGWURZHOZDVFOHDQHGE\ZDVKLQJLQDQRQSKRVSKDWH GHWHUJHQW
LH/LTXLQR[
DQGWDSZDWHUZDVKDQGWKHQULQVLQJLQGHLRQL]HGZDWHU /DERUDWRU\$QDO\VHV
7KH VRLO VDPSOHV ZHUH VXEPLWWHG WR $66(7 /DERUDWRULHV $66(7
D &DOLIRUQLD (QYLURQPHQWDO
/DERUDWRU\ $FFUHGLWDWLRQ 3URJUDPDFFUHGLWHG ODERUDWRU\ IRU DQDO\VLV 6RLO VDPSOHV ZHUH FRPSRVLWHG LQWR QLQH SULPDU\ VRLO VDPSOHV
66 &20326,7(WKURXJK66
&20326,7(
SOXV
RQHGXSOLFDWHVDPSOH
66GXSOLFDWH&20326,7(
DWDIRXUWRRQHUDWLRDQGDQDO\]HGIRU2&3V
XVLQJ8QLWHG6WDWHV(QYLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\
86(3$
0HWKRG$$GGLWLRQDOO\QLQH
SULPDU\ GLVFUHWH VRLO VDPSOHV
66#F WKURXJK 66
#
F
SOXV RQH GXSOLFDWH VDPSOH
66
GXSOLFDWH#G
FROOHFWHGIURPDFURVVWKH6LWHZHUHDQDO\]HGIRUDUVHQLFDQGOHDGXVLQJ86(3$ 0HWKRG%

.OHLQIHOGHU'5$)7 3KDVH,(QYLURQPHQWDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW3URSRVHG&RVWFR:DUHKRXVHDQG *DV6WDWLRQ1(&RUQHURI1RUWK5LYHUVLGH'ULYHDQG:HVW+HUQGRQ$YHQXH)UHVQR)UHVQR&RXQW\ &DOLIRUQLD
1)UHVQR
5LYHUVLGH5HOR:
&:
-DQXDU\

$/+5 3DJHRI )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
./(,1)(/'(55LGJH5RXWH'ULYH6XLWH/DJXQD+LOOV&$ S_

I_

),(/'2%6(59$7,216$1'$1$/<7,&$/5(68/76
6RLO6DPSOLQJ$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV
$VXPPDU\RIWKHDQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVIRUWKHVRLOVDPSOHVIROORZV
• $V 7DEOH LQGLFDWHV WHQ FRPSRVLWH VRLO VDPSOHV ZHUH DQDO\]HG IRU 2&3V LQFOXGLQJ D GXSOLFDWH FROOHFWHG RI WKH 66 &20326,7( VRLO VDPSOH 7KH 2&3V ¶GLFKORURGLSKHQ\OGLFKORURHWKHQH
¶''(
DOSKDFKORUGDQH FKORUGDQH DQG
JDPPDFKORUGDQH KDG FRQFHQWUDWLRQV UHSRUWHG DERYHPHWKRG GHWHFWLRQ OLPLWV 0'/
7KH
2&3V¶''(DQGJDPPDFKORUGDQHZHUHUHSRUWHGDWFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRI-PLOOLJUDPV SHUNLORJUDP
PJNJ
DQG-PJNJUHVSHFWLYHO\LQWKH66&20326,7(VRLOVDPSOH 7KH ³-´ TXDOLILHU LQGLFDWHV WKDW WKH DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOW LV DERYH WKH 0'/ EXW EHORZ WKH ODERUDWRU\UHSRUWLQJOLPLWDQGLVDQHVWLPDWHGYDOXH7KH2&3VDOSKDFKORUGDQHFKORUGDQH DQG JDPPDFKORUGDQH ZHUH UHSRUWHG DW FRQFHQWUDWLRQV RI - PJNJ PJNJ DQG
PJNJ UHVSHFWLYHO\ LQ WKH 66 &20326,7( VRLO VDPSOH 2WKHU 2&3V ZHUH QRW SUHVHQWLQWKHVDPSOHVDWFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDWRUDERYHWKHLUUHVSHFWLYHUHSRUWLQJOLPLW • $V7DEOHLQGLFDWHVWHQGLVFUHWHVRLOVDPSOHVZHUHDQDO\]HGDUVHQLFDQGOHDGLQFOXGLQJD GXSOLFDWHRIWKH66#GVRLOVDPSOH$UVHQLFFRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHQRWSUHVHQWLQHDFKRI WKHVDPSOHVDWFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDWRUDERYHWKHLUUHVSHFWLYH0'//HDGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUH GHWHFWHGLQHDFKVDPSOHDQDO\]HGDQGUDQJHGIURPPJNJWRPJNJ $66(7¶V ODERUDWRU\ UHSRUW RI LWV DQDO\VHV LV DWWDFKHG .OHLQIHOGHU¶V HYDOXDWLRQ RI WKH DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOWVLVSURYLGHGLQWKHQH[WVHFWLRQRIWKLVUHSRUW (9$/8$7,212)$1$/<7,&$/5(68/76
7KH VRLO DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOWV ZHUH FRPSDUHGWR 6DQ )UDQFLVFR %D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU 4XDOLW\ &RQWURO %RDUG
6)%5:4&%
7LHU (QYLURQPHQWDO 6FUHHQLQJ /HYHOV
(6/V
ODVW XSGDWHG LQ -XO\

7KH7LHU(6/VZHUHGHVLJQHGE\WKH6)%5:4&%WREHSURWHFWLYHIRUSURSHUWLHVZLWKXQUHVWULFWHG ODQGDQGZDWHUXVHDQGWKH\DGGUHVVPHGLDLQFOXGLQJVRLOJURXQGZDWHUDQGVRLOYDSRUDORQJZLWKD UDQJH RI FRQFHUQV LQFOXGLQJ GLUHFW H[SRVXUH KXPDQ KHDOWK ULVNV LPSDFW WR GULQNLQJ ZDWHU YDSRU LQWUXVLRQDQGLPSDFWWRWHUUHVWULDOKDELWDW8VHRIWKH7LHU(6/VDSSOLHVWKHPRVWFRQVHUYDWLYH(6/ IRU HDFK DQDO\WH RI FRQFHUQ,Q DGGLWLRQWR FRPSDULVRQZLWKWKH7LHU (6/VWKH UHVXOWVZHUH DOVR FRPSDUHGWRWKH6)%5:4&%¶VFRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDO(6/VXSGDWHGLQ-XO\
7KH VRLO DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOWV ZHUH DOVR FRPSDUHG WR KXPDQKHDOWK ULVNEDVHG VFUHHQLQJ OHYHOV IRU FRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDO VRLO SUHVHQWHG LQ WKH &DOLIRUQLD (QYLURQPHQWDO 3URWHFWLRQ $JHQF\ 'HSDUWPHQW RI 7R[LF 6XEVWDQFHV &RQWURO
'76&
2IILFH RI +XPDQ DQG(FRORJLFDO 5LVN
+(52

+XPDQ+HDOWK5LVN$VVHVVPHQW
++5$
1RWH1XPEHUODVWXSGDWHGLQ-XQHIRUDQDO\WHV WKDW KDYH VXFK YDOXHV )RU WKRVH DQDO\WHV ZLWKRXW SXEOLVKHG '76& +(52 VFUHHQLQJ YDOXHV

'76&6/V
IRUVRLO.OHLQIHOGHUFRPSDUHGWKHPHDVXUHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQWKHVRLOVDPSOHVWRWKH 86 (3$¶V 1RYHPEHU 5HJLRQDO 6FUHHQLQJ /HYHOV 56/V
IRU LQGXVWULDO VRLO
IRU +D]DUG
4XRWLHQWRI

$OVR LQ FRQVLGHUDWLRQ RI FRQFHQWUDWLRQ WKUHVKROGV IRU &DOLIRUQLDUHJXODWHG DQG )HGHUDO 5&5$ KD]DUGRXVZDVWHVWKHUHSRUWHGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHFRPSDUHGWRWKHLUUHVSHFWLYH&DOLIRUQLD&RGH RI5HJXODWLRQV
&&5
7LWOH7RWDO7KUHVKROG/LPLW&RQFHQWUDWLRQ
77/&
YDOXHLIDQFRQVWLWXHQW
KDV D SXEOLVKHG 77/& $OVR WR DVVHVV ZKHWKHU VROXEOH DQDO\VLV ZDV ZDUUDQWHG WKH UHSRUWHG FRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHFRPSDUHGWRWLPHVWKHJLYHQFRQVWLWXHQW¶V&&57LWOH6ROXEOH7KUHVKROG /LPLW &RQFHQWUDWLRQ
67/&
DQG WLPHV LWV )HGHUDO 7R[LFLW\ &KDUDFWHULVWLFV /HDFKLQJ 3RWHQWLDO
$/+5 3DJHRI )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
./(,1)(/'(55LGJH5RXWH'ULYH6XLWH/DJXQD+LOOV&$ S_

I_

7&/3
WKUHVKROGV LI WKH FRQVWLWXHQW KDV VXFK SXEOLVKHG YDOXHV DV SUHYLRXVO\ GLVFXVVHG
7KH
VROXEOH UHVXOWVZHUH FRPSDUHGWRWKH UHVSHFWLYH67/&RU7&/3WKUHVKROG DVDSSOLFDEOH
7KHVH
DSSOLFDEOHVFUHHQLQJYDOXHVDUHLQFOXGHGLQ7DEOHVDQG $V7DEOHLQGLFDWHVWKH2&3V¶''(DOSKDFKORUGDQHFKORUGDQHDQGJDPPDFKORUGDQHKDG FRQFHQWUDWLRQV UHSRUWHG DERYH0'/V LQ RQH RUWZR RIWKH FRPSRVLWH VRLO VDPSOHV 7KH UHSRUWHG FRQFHQWUDWLRQ RI ¶''( GLG QRW H[FHHG WKH 7LHU RU FRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDO VRLO (6/V FRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDOVRLO'76&6/LQGXVWULDOVRLO56/RUWKH77/&IRU¶''($OSKDFKORUGDQH DQG JDPPDFKORUGDQH GR QRW KDYH LQGLYLGXDO VFUHHQLQJ OHYHOV KRZHYHU ZKHQ DOSKDFKORUGDQH
DQGJDPPDFKORUGDQHFRQFHQWUDWLRQVZHUHDGGHGWRJHWKHUZLWKFKORUGDQH DVDGGLWLYHFKORUGDQH

LVRPHUV
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
0'/ GRHV QRW H[FHHGWKH LQGXVWULDO 56/ 7KH'76& DQG6)%5:4&% KDYH DFNQRZOHGJHGWKDW QDWXUDOO\RFFXUULQJ
LH EDFNJURXQG
OHYHOV RI DUVHQLF LQ &DOLIRUQLD VRLOV FRPPRQO\ H[FHHG VRLO ULVNEDVHG VFUHHQLQJ OHYHOV IRU DUVHQLF
7KH0'/ IRU DUVHQLF LV WZR RUGHUV RIPDJQLWXGH EHORZ QDWXUDOO\RFFXUULQJEDFNJURXQGDUVHQLFOHYHOV7KHUHIRUHLWLV.OHLQIHOGHU¶VRSLQLRQWKDWWKH0'/LV VXIILFLHQWO\ORZDQGWKDWDUVHQLFLVQRWDFRQFHUQIRUWKH6LWH $V DOVR LQGLFDWHG LQ 7DEOH DUVHQLF DQG OHDG FRQFHQWUDWLRQV GLG QRW H[FHHG WKH JLYHQ PHWDO¶V 77/&WLPHVWKH67/&RUWLPHVWKH77/&%DVHGRQWKHDQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVVRLOZDVWHZRXOG EHFRQVLGHUHGQRQKD]DUGRXV7KHUHIRUHQRIXUWKHUDVVHVVPHQWLVUHFRPPHQGHG &21&/86,216$1'5(&200(1'$7,216
.OHLQIHOGHU¶VILHOGREVHUYDWLRQVDQGHYDOXDWLRQVRIWKHDQDO\WLFDOUHVXOWVRIWKHVDPSOHVFROOHFWHG DQGDQDO\]HGGXULQJWKLV/LPLWHG3KDVH,,(6$KDYHUHYHDOHGWKHIROORZLQJ
• 7KH UHSRUWHG 2&3 FRQFHQWUDWLRQV GR QRW H[FHHG WKH FRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDO (6/V '76&6/VDQG56/VIRUVRLO&KORUGDQHLQRQHFRPSRVLWHVRLOVDPSOHH[FHHGVWKH7LHU (6/IRUWHUUHVWULDOKDELWDWZKLFKLVQRWGLUHFWO\DSSOLFDEOHWRWKHFRPPHUFLDOGHYHORSPHQWRI WKH6LWH
• $UVHQLFZDVQRWGHWHFWHGDERYHWKHODERUDWRU\0'/V • 5HSRUWHGOHDGFRQFHQWUDWLRQVLQWKHVRLOVDPSOHVGLGQRWH[FHHGLWVUHVSHFWLYH7LHU(6/ RUFRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDO(6/V'76&6/VRU56/V

%UDGIRUG*5&KDQJ$&3DJH$/%DNKWDU')UDPSWRQ-$:ULJKW+

%DFNJURXQG&RQFHQWUDWLRQV
RI7UDFH0HWDOVDQG0DMRU(OHPHQWVLQ&DOLIRUQLD6RLOV.HDUQH\)RXQGDWLRQRI6RLO6FLHQFH'LYLVLRQ RI$JULFXOWXUHDQG1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV8QLYHUVLW\RI&DOLIRUQLD0DUFK

$/+5 3DJHRI )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
./(,1)(/'(55LGJH5RXWH'ULYH6XLWH/DJXQD+LOOV&$ S_

I_

• .OHLQIHOGHUXQGHUVWDQGVWKH6LWHDUHDVDPSOHGZLOOEHGHYHORSHGE\&RVWFRDVDSDUNLQJORW %DVHG RQWKH DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOWV QRIXUWKHU DVVHVVPHQWIRU2&3V DQGPHWDOV LV SUHVHQWO\ UHFRPPHQGHG
/,0,7$7,216
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¶V ZULWWHQDJUHHPHQWZLWK.OHLQIHOGHUFRYHULQJWKHZRUNSHUIRUPHGKHUHLQ .OHLQIHOGHU¶V SURIHVVLRQDO RSLQLRQV DQG UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV DUH EDVHG RQ D OLPLWHG QXPEHU RIILHOG REVHUYDWLRQV DQG WHVWV GHVLJQHG FROOHFWHG DQG SHUIRUPHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH JHQHUDOO\ DFFHSWHG HQJLQHHULQJ SUDFWLFH WKDW H[LVWV DW WKH WLPH &RQVHTXHQWO\ QR ZDUUDQW\ RU JXDUDQWHH H[SUHVVHGRULPSOLHGLVLQWHQGHGRUPDGH
&/26,1*5(0$5.6
7KDQN \RX IRU WKH RSSRUWXQLW\ WR SURYLGH .OHLQIHOGHU¶V SURIHVVLRQDO HQYLURQPHQWDO VHUYLFHV WR &RVWFR.OHLQIHOGHUORRNVIRUZDUGWRIXWXUHZRUNZLWK\RXRQRWKHUSURMHFWV3OHDVHIHHOIUHHWRFDOO WKHXQGHUVLJQHGVKRXOG\RXKDYHTXHVWLRQV
6LQFHUHO\
./(,1)(/'(5,1&
/LQGVH\'DQGULGJH3HUU\ /L]DQQH6LPPRQV3*
3URMHFW3URIHVVLRQDO 6HQLRU3ULQFLSDO*HRORJLVW FF
$QG\)UDQNV.OHLQIHOGHU
3DROR'L]RQ.OHLQIHOGHU
$WWDFKPHQWV
)LJXUH
±6DPSOH/RFDWLRQ0DS
7DEOHV
±6RLO$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV6XPPDU\±2UJDQRFKORULQH3HVWLFLGHV ±6RLO$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV6XPPDU\±$UVHQLFDQG/HDG $QDO\WLFDO/DERUDWRU\5HSRUW

$/+5 )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
),*85(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(

NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE

WEST HERNDON AVENUE
9d
2b
2d
5c
7d
5d
5a
9a
2c
8d
7c
3c
3b
6c
1a
4c
6d
1d
4d
5b
1c
6a
8b
4b
7a 7b
4a
3d
8c
1b
8a
3a
9b
6b
2a
9c
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information. 0 100 200
Feet
Aerial: ESRI World Imagery, Maxar
Metro 5/10/2020.

Locations are Approximate £
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP PROJECT:

FILE NAME:

FIGURE
1 DRAWN:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

PhaseII_Fig1.mxd
KFH
PLOTTED: 2/26/2021 11:32:40 AM, KHagan
Explanation
!( Sampling Location
Approximate Site
Boundary
LDP

LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED COSTCO WAREHOUSE AND GAS STATION

NE CORNER OF NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE

AND WEST HERNDON AVENUE
FRESNO, FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 93722
N FRESNO (RIVERSIDE-RELO W031) CW20-0569
FILE: L:\2021\20211904.001A - CSM Costco Carson CA ENV\2.0 Technical Information\2.8 GIS 20212904
FEB 2021

LAGUNA HILLS, CA

$/+5 )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
7$%/(6
7DEOH
6RLO$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV6XPPDU\±2UJDQRFKORULQH3HVWLFLGHV 3URSRVHG&RVWFR:DUHKRXVHDQG*DV6WDWLRQ
1RUWKHDVW&RUQHURI1RUWK5LYHUVLGH'ULYHDQG:HVW+HUQGRQ$YHQXH )UHVQR&DOLIRUQLD

'''
''(
''7
DOSKD
&KORUGDQH &KORUGDQH
JDPPD
&KORUGDQH 2WKHU2&3V
ђJNJ ђJNJ ђJNJ ђJNJ ђJNJ ђJNJ ђJNJ
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' - 1' 1' 1' - 1' 1' 1' 1'
- 1'
1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 1' 19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19
19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19

19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19

19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19
19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19
19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19
19 19 19 19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19
[67/& 19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19 [7&/3 19 19 19 19 19 9DU\E\DQDO\WHRU19
1RWHV

''' 'LFKORURGLSKHQ\OGLFKORURHWKDQH
''( 'LFKORURGLSKHQ\OGLFKORURHWKHQH
''7 'LFKORURGLSKHQ\OWULFKORURHWKDQH
2&3V 2UJDQRFKORULQHSHVWLFLGHVDQDO\]HGXVLQJ86(3$0HWKRG ђJNJ 0LFURJUDPVSHUNLORJUDP
J/ 0LFURJUDPVSHUOLWHU
$ 8QLWHG6WDWHV(QYLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\
86(3$
DQDO\WLFDOPHWKRGQXPEHU
1'; 1RWGHWHFWHGDWDFRQFHQWUDWLRQDWRUDERYHWKHODERUDWRU\PHWKRGGHWHFWLRQOLPLWZKLFKIROORZVWKHOHVVWKDQV\PERO

19 $QDO\WHKDVQRSXEOLVKHGYDOXH
(6/ 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUG(QYLURQPHQWDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRUVKDOORZVRLOV -XO\

'76&6/ 'HSDUWPHQWRI7R[LF6XEVWDQFHV&RQWUROUHFRPPHQGHGPRGLILHGVFUHHQLQJOHYHOIRUFRPPHUFLDOLQGXVWULDOVRLO -XQH

56/ 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRULQGXVWULDOVRLO 1RYHPEHU

77/& &DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV7LWOH7RWDO7KUHVKROG/LPLW&RQFHQWUDWLRQ 67/& &DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV7LWOH6ROXEOH7KUHVKROG/LPLW&RQFHQWUDWLRQ 7&/3 )HGHUDO7R[LFLW\&KDUDFWHULVWLF/HDFKLQJ3URFHGXUH 67/&
J/

7&/3
J/

(6/&RPPHUFLDO,QGXVWULDO
'76&6/&RPPHUFLDO,QGXVWULDO
56/,QGXVWULDO
'DWH
6DPSOHG
(6/7LHU
77/&
ђJNJ

66&20326,7(
66&20326,7(
66&20326,7(
6DPSOH
66&20326,7(
66
&20326,7(
66&20326,7(
66&20326,7(
66&20326,7(
66GXSOLFDWH&20326,7(
66&20326,7(

$$/+5
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
3DJHRI )HEUXDU\
7DEOH
6RLO$QDO\WLFDO5HVXOWV6XPPDU\±$UVHQLFDQG/HDG
3URSRVHG&RVWFR:DUHKRXVHDQG*DV6WDWLRQ
1RUWKHDVW&RUQHURI1RUWK5LYHUVLGH'ULYHDQG:HVW+HUQGRQ$YHQXH )UHVQR&DOLIRUQLD

$UVHQLF /HDG

PJNJ

% %
66#F 1'
66#G 1'
66#E 1'
66#G 1'
66#D 1'
66#D 1'
66#G 1'
66GXSOLFDWH#G 1'
66#E 1'
66
#
F 1'

[67/&
[7&/3
1RWHV

PJNJ 0LOOLJUDPVSHUNLORJUDP
PJ/ 0LOOLJUDPVSHUOLWHU
% 8QLWHG6WDWHV(QYLURQPHQWDO3URWHFWLRQ$JHQF\
86(3$
1'; 1RWSUHVHQWDWDFRQFHQWUDWLRQDWRUDERYHWKHPHWKRGGH (6/ 6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\5HJLRQDO:DWHU4XDOLW\&RQWURO%RDUG '76&6/ 'HSDUWPHQWRI7R[LF6XEVWDQFHV&RQWUROUHFRPPHQGHGV 56/ 86(3$5HJLRQDO6FUHHQLQJ/HYHOIRULQGXVWULDOVRLO 1RY
77/& &DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV7LWOH7RWDO7KUHVKROG/ 67/& &DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV7LWOH6ROXEOH7KUHVKROG 7&/3 )HGHUDO7R[LFLW\&KDUDFWHULVWLF/HDFKLQJ3URFHGXUH 7&/3
PJ/

'76&6/&RPPHUFLDO,QGXVWULDO
6DPSOH 'DWH6DPSOHG
(6/&RPPHUFLDO,QGXVWULDO
56/,QGXVWULDO
77/&
67/&
PJ/

(6/7LHU

$/+5
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
3DJHRI )HEUXDU\

$/+5 )HEUXDU\
&RS\ULJKW.OHLQIHOGHU
$1$/<7,&$//$%25$725<5(32576
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
February 18, 2021
Kleinfelder
Lindsey Dandridge-Perry
Attention: Lindsey Dandridge-Perry
RE: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
FAX: Workorder No.: N044190
TEL: (949) 585-3133
24411 Ridge Route Dr. #225
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.

Please feel free to call me at (562) 219-7435 if I can be of further assistance to your company.

Sincerely,
Andrew Garaniel
Laboratory Director
Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on February 16, 2021 by ASSET Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.

The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or in its entirety without written permission from the client and ASSET Laboratories - California. 1 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
ASSET Laboratories Date: 18-Feb-21
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190

CASE NARRATIVE
SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:

All sample containers were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.

Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample Receipt Checklist Form.

Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.

Samples were analyzed within method holding time.

Results were J-Flag. "J" is used to flag those results that are between the PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit) and the calculated MDL (Method Detection Limit). Results that are "J" Flagged are estimated values since it becomes difficult to accurately quantitate the analyte near the MDL.

Analytical comments for EPA 8081A:

RPD for Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) is outside criteria on analyte 4,4´-DDT; however, the analytical batch was validated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS). 2 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
ASSET Laboratories Date: 18-Feb-21
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Date Matrix Date Received Contract No:

Date Reported
N044190-001A SS-1a 2/16/2021 8:05:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-002A SS-1b 2/16/2021 8:15:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-003A SS-1c 2/16/2021 8:10:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-004A SS-1d 2/16/2021 8:20:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-005A SS-1 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-006A SS-2a 2/16/2021 8:30:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-007A SS-2b 2/16/2021 8:35:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-008A SS-2c 2/16/2021 8:50:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-009A SS-2d 2/16/2021 8:40:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-010A SS-2 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-011A SS-3a 2/16/2021 9:55:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-012A SS-3b 2/16/2021 9:45:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-013A SS-3c 2/16/2021 10:00:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-014A SS-3d 2/16/2021 9:40:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-015A SS-3 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-016A SS-4a 2/16/2021 9:00:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-017A SS-4b 2/16/2021 9:07:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-018A SS-4c 2/16/2021 9:25:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-019A SS-4d 2/16/2021 9:15:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-020A SS-4 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-021A SS-5a 2/16/2021 12:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-022A SS-5b 2/16/2021 12:20:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-023A SS-5c 2/16/2021 12:10:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-024A SS-5d 2/16/2021 12:15:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-025A SS-5 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-026A SS-6a 2/16/2021 12:25:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-027A SS-6b 2/16/2021 12:35:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-028A SS-6c 2/16/2021 12:45:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-029A SS-6d 2/16/2021 12:40:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil 3 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Date Matrix Date Received Contract No:

Date Reported
N044190-030A SS-6 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-031A SS-7a 2/16/2021 2:10:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-032A SS-7b 2/16/2021 1:55:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-033A SS-7c 2/16/2021 2:25:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-034A SS-7d 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-035A SS-7 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-036A SS-7a duplicate 2/16/2021 2:15:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-037A SS-7b duplicate 2/16/2021 2:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-038A SS-7c duplicate 2/16/2021 2:30:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-039A SS-7d duplicate 2/16/2021 1:35:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-040A SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-041A SS-8a 2/16/2021 12:50:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-042A SS-8b 2/16/2021 12:55:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-043A SS-8c 2/16/2021 1:10:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-044A SS-8d 2/16/2021 1:05:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-045A SS-8 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-046A SS-9a 2/16/2021 2:40:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-047A SS-9b 2/16/2021 2:45:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-048A SS-9c 2/16/2021 2:55:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-049A SS-9d 2/16/2021 3:05:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-050A SS-9 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-051A SS-01@1c 2/16/2021 8:12:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-052A SS-02@2d 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-053A SS-03@3b 2/16/2021 9:50:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-054A SS-04@4d 2/16/2021 9:20:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-055A SS-05@5a 2/16/2021 12:05:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-056A SS-06@6a 2/16/2021 12:30:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-057A SS-07@7d 2/16/2021 1:40:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-058A SS-07 duplicate@7d 2/16/2021 1:45:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil N044190-059A SS-08@8b 2/16/2021 1:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil 4 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Date Matrix Date Received Contract No:

Date Reported
N044190-060A SS-09@9c 2/16/2021 3:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 Soil 5 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-1 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.68 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 02:31 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.49 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 02:31 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.28 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 15 2/17/2021 02:31 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 49.9 0 2/17/2021 02:31 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 56.0 0 2/17/2021 02:31 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 6 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-2 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-010
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.67 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 0.35 0.35 2/17/2021 02:57 PM 2.0 J μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 02:57 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.34 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.48 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 02:57 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 0.32 0.28 2/17/2021 02:57 PM 1.0 J μg/Kg 1 Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 14 2/17/2021 02:57 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 52.6 0 2/17/2021 02:57 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 54.7 0 2/17/2021 02:57 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 7 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-3 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-015
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.67 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 03:22 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 0.96 0.52 2/17/2021 03:22 PM 1.0 J μg/Kg 1 beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 12 2.4 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.49 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 03:22 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 1.2 0.28 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1 Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 15 2/17/2021 03:22 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 53.7 0 2/17/2021 03:22 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 51.5 0 2/17/2021 03:22 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 8 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-4 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-020
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.68 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 04:20 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.49 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 04:20 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.28 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 15 2/17/2021 04:20 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 57.1 0 2/17/2021 04:20 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 58.9 0 2/17/2021 04:20 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 9 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-5 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-025
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.68 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 04:46 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.49 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 04:46 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.28 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 15 2/17/2021 04:46 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 61.0 0 2/17/2021 04:46 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 55.0 0 2/17/2021 04:46 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 10 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-6 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-030
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.67 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 05:12 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.34 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.48 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 05:12 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.28 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 14 2/17/2021 05:12 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 70.6 0 2/17/2021 05:12 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 56.6 0 2/17/2021 05:12 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 11 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-7 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-035
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.68 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 05:37 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.49 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 05:37 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.28 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 15 2/17/2021 05:37 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 41.7 0 2/17/2021 05:37 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 49.5 0 2/17/2021 05:37 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 12 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-040
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.67 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 06:03 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.34 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.48 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 06:03 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 14 2/17/2021 06:03 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 53.3 0 2/17/2021 06:03 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 53.0 0 2/17/2021 06:03 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 13 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-8 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-045
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.67 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 06:29 PM 0.99 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 0.99 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 0.99 ND 0.51 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1 beta-BHC 0.99 ND 0.34 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.4 ND 2.3 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 0.99 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 0.99 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.48 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 06:29 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 0.99 ND 0.23 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 0.99 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1 Heptachlor 0.99 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 0.99 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.4 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 84 ND 14 2/17/2021 06:29 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 51.7 0 2/17/2021 06:29 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 52.0 0 2/17/2021 06:29 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 14 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-9 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-050
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A 85282 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND 0.67 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND 0.35 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Aldrin ND 0.28 2/17/2021 06:55 PM 1.0 μg/Kg 1
alpha-BHC 1.0 ND 0.43 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
alpha-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.52 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
beta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.34 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Chlordane 8.5 ND 2.4 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
delta-BHC 1.0 ND 0.45 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Dieldrin 2.0 ND 0.44 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan I 1.0 ND 0.30 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan II 2.0 ND 0.61 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Endosulfan sulfate 2.0 ND 0.48 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1 Endrin ND 1.0 2/17/2021 06:55 PM 2.0 μg/Kg 1
Endrin aldehyde 2.0 ND 0.90 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Endrin ketone 2.0 ND 0.58 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-BHC 1.0 ND 0.24 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
gamma-Chlordane 1.0 ND 0.28 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor 1.0 ND 0.60 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 ND 0.27 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1 Methoxychlor 8.5 ND 2.8 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Toxaphene 85 ND 14 2/17/2021 06:55 PM μg/Kg 1
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 32-100 %REC 55.5 0 2/17/2021 06:55 PM 1 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 26-104 %REC 55.3 0 2/17/2021 06:55 PM 1 Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 15 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-01@1c
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 8:12:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-051
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 03:25 PM 1
Lead 5.8 0.30 2/17/2021 03:25 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 16 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-02@2d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-052
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 03:54 PM 1
Lead 5.5 0.29 2/17/2021 03:54 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 17 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-03@3b
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 9:50:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-053
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:10 PM 1
Lead 6.1 0.29 2/17/2021 04:10 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 18 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-04@4d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 9:20:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-054
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:16 PM 1
Lead 5.8 0.30 2/17/2021 04:16 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 19 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-05@5a
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 12:05:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-055
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:22 PM 1
Lead 4.4 0.30 2/17/2021 04:22 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 20 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-06@6a
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 12:30:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-056
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:28 PM 1
Lead 6.1 0.29 2/17/2021 04:28 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 21 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-07@7d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 1:40:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-057
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:34 PM 1
Lead 5.6 0.29 2/17/2021 04:34 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 22 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-07 duplicate@7d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 1:45:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-058
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:40 PM 1
Lead 5.6 0.30 2/17/2021 04:40 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 23 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-08@8b
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 1:00:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-059
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:46 PM 1
Lead 5.6 0.29 2/17/2021 04:46 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 24 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-09@9c
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 3:00:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-060
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed MDL PQL DF

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A 85278 QC Batch: PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic 1.0 mg/Kg ND 0.54 2/17/2021 04:52 PM 1
Lead 7.4 0.30 2/17/2021 04:52 PM 1.0 mg/Kg 1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 25 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
ASSET Laboratories Date: 18-Feb-21Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03CLIENT: KleinfelderWork Order: N044190 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: MB-85278
Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109732
SampType: TestCode: MBLK 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 1.0 ND
Lead 1.0 NDSample ID: LCS-85278
Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109733
SampType: TestCode: LCS 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 24.689 1.0 25.00 98.8 80 120 0
Lead 24.862 1.0 25.00 99.4 80 120 0Sample ID: N044190-051A-MS Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109739
SampType: TestCode: MS 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 20.524 1.0 24.95 82.3 75 125 0
Lead 28.025 1.0 24.95 89.2 75 125 5.759Sample ID: N044190-051A-MSD Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109740
SampType: TestCode: MSD 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 20.936 1.0 24.99 83.8 75 125 20 0 20.52 1.99
Lead 28.099 1.0 24.99 89.4 75 125 20 5.759 28.03 0.263
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 26 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03CLIENT: KleinfelderWork Order: N044190 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: LCS-85282
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109834
SampType: TestCode: LCS 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 14.537 2.0 16.67 87.2 35 117 0
4,4´-DDE 13.668 2.0 16.67 82.0 44 118 04,4´-DDT 12.995 2.0 16.67 78.0 37 114 0Aldrin 12.940 1.0 16.67 77.6 35 128 0alpha-BHC 13.457 1.0 16.67 80.7 38 123 0alpha-Chlordane 16.67 78.3 39 118 13.052 1.0 0beta-BHC 11.995 1.0 16.67 72.0 34 109 0delta-BHC 13.075 1.0 16.67 78.4 40 107 0Dieldrin 14.103 2.0 16.67 84.6 39 129 0Endosulfan I 13.233 1.0 16.67 79.4 39 118 0Endosulfan II 13.890 2.0 16.67 83.3 34 139 0Endosulfan sulfate 16.67 92.4 49 114 15.410 2.0 0Endrin 15.153 2.0 16.67 90.9 47 130 0Endrin aldehyde 16.67 82.4 42 116 13.730 2.0 0Endrin ketone 16.67 96.1 43 114 16.018 2.0 0gamma-BHC 13.625 1.0 16.67 81.7 35 124 0gamma-Chlordane 16.67 79.9 33 117 13.315 1.0 0Heptachlor 13.233 1.0 16.67 79.4 44 126 0Heptachlor epoxide 16.67 76.8 37 118 12.807 1.0 0Methoxychlor 14.528 8.5 16.67 87.2 49 121 0 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.67 70.0 32 100 11.668
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.67 79.8 26 104 13.297
Sample ID: MB-85282
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109835
SampType: TestCode: MBLK 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 2.0 ND
4,4´-DDE 2.0 ND4,4´-DDT 2.0 ND
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 27 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03CLIENT: KleinfelderWork Order: N044190 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: MB-85282
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109835
SampType: TestCode: MBLK 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
Aldrin 1.0 ND
alpha-BHC 1.0 NDalpha-Chlordane 1.0 NDbeta-BHC 1.0 NDChlordane 8.5 NDdelta-BHC 1.0 NDDieldrin 2.0 NDEndosulfan I 1.0 NDEndosulfan II 2.0 NDEndosulfan sulfate 2.0 NDEndrin 2.0 NDEndrin aldehyde 2.0 NDEndrin ketone 2.0 NDgamma-BHC 1.0 NDgamma-Chlordane 1.0 NDHeptachlor 1.0 NDHeptachlor epoxide 1.0 NDMethoxychlor 8.5 NDToxaphene 85 ND Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.67 67.0 32 100 11.177
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.67 75.7 26 104 12.612
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MS
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109847
SampType: TestCode: MS 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 11.275 2.0 16.63 67.8 33 104 0
4,4´-DDE 9.096 2.0 16.63 54.7 27 104 0
4,4´-DDT 3.537 2.0 16.63 21.3 16 103 0Aldrin 8.512 1.0 16.63 51.2 27 101 0 Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 28 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03CLIENT: KleinfelderWork Order: N044190 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MS
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109847
SampType: TestCode: MS 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
alpha-BHC 8.928 1.0 16.63 53.7 30 100 0
alpha-Chlordane 16.63 51.1 32 100 8.504 1.0 0beta-BHC 8.170 1.0 16.63 49.1 24 100 0delta-BHC 8.871 1.0 16.63 53.4 32 100 0Dieldrin 9.234 2.0 16.63 55.5 30 100 0Endosulfan I 8.529 1.0 16.63 51.3 26 100 0Endosulfan II 8.936 2.0 16.63 53.7 26 100 0Endosulfan sulfate 16.63 58.1 26 100 9.663 2.0 0Endrin 9.771 2.0 16.63 58.8 37 102 0Endrin aldehyde 16.63 46.8 15 100 7.779 2.0 0Endrin ketone 16.63 50.5 19 100 8.399 2.0 0gamma-BHC 8.890 1.0 16.63 53.5 30 100 0gamma-Chlordane 16.63 53.8 24 102 8.946 1.0 0Heptachlor 7.743 1.0 16.63 46.6 30 106 0Heptachlor epoxide 16.63 51.5 28 100 8.559 1.0 0Methoxychlor 5.623 8.5 16.63 33.8 21 122 J 0 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.63 48.3 32 100 8.037
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.63 52.2 26 104 8.684
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MSD
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109848
SampType: TestCode: MSD 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 10.603 2.0 16.65 63.7 33 104 20 0 11.27 6.15
4,4´-DDE 8.783 2.0 16.65 52.8 27 104 20 0 9.096 3.50
4,4´-DDT 4.897 2.0 16.65 29.4 16 103 20 R 0 3.537 32.2Aldrin 8.261 1.0 16.65 49.6 27 101 20 0 8.512 3.00alpha-BHC 8.407 1.0 16.65 50.5 30 100 20 0 8.928 6.01alpha-Chlordane 16.65 50.0 32 100 20 8.319 1.0 0 8.504 2.20beta-BHC 7.818 1.0 16.65 47.0 24 100 20 0 8.170 4.40 Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 29 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03CLIENT: KleinfelderWork Order: N044190 ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MSD
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPD LowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual Units: μg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109848
SampType: TestCode: MSD 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
delta-BHC 8.499 1.0 16.65 51.0 32 100 20 0 8.871 4.29
Dieldrin 8.648 2.0 16.65 51.9 30 100 20 0 9.234 6.55Endosulfan I 8.620 1.0 16.65 51.8 26 100 20 0 8.529 1.06Endosulfan II 8.830 2.0 16.65 53.0 26 100 20 0 8.936 1.20Endosulfan sulfate 16.65 54.3 26 100 20 9.033 2.0 0 9.663 6.74Endrin 9.516 2.0 16.65 57.2 37 102 20 0 9.771 2.64Endrin aldehyde 16.65 41.5 15 100 20 6.901 2.0 0 7.779 12.0Endrin ketone 16.65 48.2 19 100 20 8.021 2.0 0 8.399 4.61gamma-BHC 8.555 1.0 16.65 51.4 30 100 20 0 8.890 3.83gamma-Chlordane 16.65 52.2 24 102 20 8.695 1.0 0 8.946 2.85Heptachlor 7.425 1.0 16.65 44.6 30 106 20 0 7.743 4.19Heptachlor epoxide 16.65 48.5 28 100 20 8.069 1.0 0 8.559 5.89Methoxychlor 6.268 8.5 16.65 37.7 21 122 20 J 0 5.623 0 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 16.65 48.1 32 100 8.009 0
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 16.65 50.9 26 104 8.474 0
Qualifiers:

If you have any questions or further instruction, please contact our Project Coordinator at (702) 307-2659.

Carrier name: ASSET
Cooler Received/Opened On: 2/17/2021
Rep sample Temp (Deg C): 3.8/4.1 IR Gun ID: 2
Temp Blank: Yes No
Last 4 digits of Tracking No.: NA
Cooling process: Ice Ice Pack Dry Ice Other None
Packing Material Used: None
Workorder: N044190
Sample Receipt Checklist

4. Chain of custody present? Yes No

6. Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No

7. Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No

8. Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No

9. Sample containers intact? Yes No

10. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No

11. All samples received within holding time? Yes No

13. Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Yes No NA

14. Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No NA
Example: pH > 12 for (CN,S); pH<2 for Metals

1. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present

2. Custody seals intact, signed, dated on shippping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present

3. Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present

5. Sampler's name present in COC? Yes No

12. Temperature of rep sample or Temp Blank within acceptable limit? Yes No NA

15. Did the bottle labels indicate correct preservatives used? Yes No NA

16. Were there Non-Conformance issues at login? Yes No NA Was Client notified? Yes No NA
Comments:

Checklist Completed By: BHN Reviewed By:

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:Client ID: KLEFE02Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-001A SS-1a 2/16/2021 8:05:00 AM Soil WS
N044190-002A SS-1b 2/16/2021 8:15:00 AM WSN044190-003A SS-1c 2/16/2021 8:10:00 AM WSN044190-004A SS-1d 2/16/2021 8:20:00 AM WSN044190-005A SS-1 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-006A SS-2a 2/16/2021 8:30:00 AM WS
N044190-007A SS-2b 2/16/2021 8:35:00 AM WSN044190-008A SS-2c 2/16/2021 8:50:00 AM WSN044190-009A SS-2d 2/16/2021 8:40:00 AM WSN044190-010A SS-2 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-011A SS-3a 2/16/2021 9:55:00 AM WS
N044190-012A SS-3b 2/16/2021 9:45:00 AM WSN044190-013A SS-3c 2/16/2021 10:00:00 AM WSN044190-014A SS-3d 2/16/2021 9:40:00 AM WSN044190-015A SS-3 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-016A SS-4a 2/16/2021 9:00:00 AM WS
N044190-017A SS-4b 2/16/2021 9:07:00 AM WSN044190-018A SS-4c 2/16/2021 9:25:00 AM WS

Page 1 of 4 ends

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:Client ID: KLEFE02Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-019A SS-4d 2/16/2021 9:15:00 AM Soil WS
N044190-020A SS-4 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-021A SS-5a 2/16/2021 12:00:00 PM WS
N044190-022A SS-5b 2/16/2021 12:20:00 PM WSN044190-023A SS-5c 2/16/2021 12:10:00 PM WSN044190-024A SS-5d 2/16/2021 12:15:00 PM WSN044190-025A SS-5 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-026A SS-6a 2/16/2021 12:25:00 PM WS
N044190-027A SS-6b 2/16/2021 12:35:00 PM WSN044190-028A SS-6c 2/16/2021 12:45:00 PM WSN044190-029A SS-6d 2/16/2021 12:40:00 PM WSN044190-030A SS-6 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-031A SS-7a 2/16/2021 2:10:00 PM WS
N044190-032A SS-7b 2/16/2021 1:55:00 PM WSN044190-033A SS-7c 2/16/2021 2:25:00 PM WSN044190-034A SS-7d 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM WSN044190-035A SS-7 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG

Page 2 of 4 ends

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:Client ID: KLEFE02Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-036A SS-7a duplicate 2/16/2021 2:15:00 PM Soil WS N044190-037A SS-7b duplicate 2/16/2021 2:00:00 PM WSN044190-038A SS-7c duplicate 2/16/2021 2:30:00 PM WSN044190-039A SS-7d duplicate 2/16/2021 1:35:00 PM WSN044190-040A SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-041A SS-8a 2/16/2021 12:50:00 PM WS
N044190-042A SS-8b 2/16/2021 12:55:00 PM WSN044190-043A SS-8c 2/16/2021 1:10:00 PM WSN044190-044A SS-8d 2/16/2021 1:05:00 PM WSN044190-045A SS-8 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-046A SS-9a 2/16/2021 2:40:00 PM WS
N044190-047A SS-9b 2/16/2021 2:45:00 PM WSN044190-048A SS-9c 2/16/2021 2:55:00 PM WSN044190-049A SS-9d 2/16/2021 3:05:00 PM WSN044190-050A SS-9 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-051A SS-01@1c 2/16/2021 8:12:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-052A SS-02@2d 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI

Page 3 of 4 ends

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:Client ID: KLEFE02Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-052A SS-02@2d 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM 2/18/2021 Soil EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI N044190-053A SS-03@3b 2/16/2021 9:50:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-054A SS-04@4d 2/16/2021 9:20:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-055A SS-05@5a 2/16/2021 12:05:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-056A SS-06@6a 2/16/2021 12:30:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-057A SS-07@7d 2/16/2021 1:40:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-058A SS-07 duplicate@7d 2/16/2021 1:45:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-059A SS-08@8b 2/16/2021 1:00:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-060A SS-09@9c 2/16/2021 3:00:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-061A FOLDER 2/18/2021 2/18/2021 Folder Folder LAB 2/18/2021 Folder Folder LAB

Page 4 of 4 ends

Appendix H
Noise Calculations

Existing Traffic Noise
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 1 Riverside Dr (Between Spruce Ave and the northernmost project driveway) 2,050 35 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 57.02 Riverside Dr (Between the northernmost project driveway and Fir Avenue) 2,060 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 58.63 Riverside Dr (Between Fir Avenue and the southernmost project driveway) 2,270 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 59.04 Riverside Dr (Between the southernmost project driveway and Herndon Ave) 2,260 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 59.05 Herndon Ave (west of Riverside Drive) 24,880 45 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 70.86 Herndon Ave (Between Riverside Dr and Arthur Ave) 21,050 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 71.47 Herndon Ave (East of Arthur Ave) 21,050 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 71.48 ADT Limit to Comply with General Plan Exterior Noise Standard 9,000 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 65.0 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% *All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels. 28 221 698
12 39
Segment Description and Location
ADT
4 12
1 111411 25
22 70
Input
Speed Traffic Distribution Characteristics
Output
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet)4
4 221
36 Distance to Contour, (feet)3
698
5 16 49 156
39 19 61 191 60522 70
Existing-Plus-Project Traffic Noise
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 1 Riverside Dr (Between Spruce Ave and the northernmost project driveway) 5,536 35 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 61.32 Riverside Dr (Between the northernmost project driveway and Fir Avenue) 7,783 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 64.33 Riverside Dr (Between Fir Avenue and the southernmost project driveway) 19,500 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 68.34 Riverside Dr (Between the southernmost project driveway and Herndon Ave) 20,603 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 68.65 Herndon Ave (west of Riverside Drive) 37,158 45 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.66 Herndon Ave (Between Riverside Dr and Arthur Ave) 26,352 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.47 Herndon Ave (East of Arthur Ave) 26,321 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% *All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels.

Input Output
ADT
Speed
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet) Segment Description and Location 4 Traffic Distribution Characteristics Distance to Contour, (feet)3 2 7 21 67
11 36 113 35829 90 286 904
4 14 43 135
11 34 107 33928 87 276 87328 87 276 872
Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA Existing Conditions
1 Riverside Dr (Between Spruce Ave and Entry B) 6,124 35 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 61.72 Riverside Dr (Between Entry B and Entry C) 9,483 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 65.23 Riverside Dr (Between Entry C and Entry D) 23,459 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 69.1 4 Riverside Dr (Between Entry D and Herndon Ave) 25,128 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 69.4 5 Herndon Ave (west of Riverside Drive) 37,169 45 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.6 6 Herndon Ave (Between Riverside Dr and Arthur Ave) 26,332 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 7 Herndon Ave (East of Arthur Ave) 26,332 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% *All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels.

Input Output
ADT
Speed
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet) Segment Description and Location 4 Traffic Distribution Characteristics Distance to Contour, (feet)3 2 7 23 74
14 44 138 43729 90 286 904
5 16 52 165
13 41 129 40828 87 276 87328 87 276 873
Citation # Citations
1 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Table (5-11), Pg 5-60. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Table (4-2), Pg 4-17. 2 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-26), Pg 5-60. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (4-5), Pg 4-17 3 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-16), Pg 2-32. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 4 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-11), Pg 5-47, 48. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 5 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-26), Pg 2-55, 56. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (2-23), Pg 2-5 6 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-27), Pg 2-57. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (2-24), Pg 2-5 7 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Pg 2-53. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Pg 2-57. 8 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-7), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 9 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-8), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 10 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-9), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 11 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-13), Pg 5-49. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 12 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-14), Pg 5-49. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 13 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (16), Pg 67 14 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (20), Pg 69 15 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (18), Pg 69 References
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2009 (November). Technical Noise Supplement. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/tens_complete.pdf. Accessed A 2017.

Fresno Costco Onsite Construction Noise
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 1,193 Paver 0.2
50 Grader 0.4
Single-Family Residence
(West Parr Avenue west of
project site) 90
Roller

0.2 Rio Vista Middle School 850 Scraper 0.4
River Bluff Elementary
School 1230
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Paver 78.0
Grader 81.0
Roller 78.0
Scraper 81.0
88 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level;
U.F.= Usage Factor;
G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2006: pg 6-23); and D = Distance from source to receiver.

87.6 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

60.0 85

82.4 85

62.9 85

59.7 Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)
Fresno Costco Offsite Construction Noise
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 974 Paver 0.2
50 Grader 0.4
Nearest Residence 90
Off-site improvements
corresponding with
infrastructure improvment
1 in PD 60
Off-site improvements
corresponding with
infrastructure improvment
3 in PD 1000
Off-site improvements
corresponding with
infrastructure improvment
5 in PD 80
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8Receiver Height 5Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Paver 78.0Grader 81.0
86 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1.2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level;U.F.= Usage Factor;G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2006: pg 6-23); andD = Distance from source to receiver.

Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)

59.881.780.784.2
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

60.0 8585.8 85
Equipment Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560 Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0Generator (<25KVA, VMS signs) 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jack 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle) 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100Vacuum Excavator (Vac-truck) 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0chipper 75Source:FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1U.S. Department of TransportationCA/T Construction Spec. 721.560 Nightime Construction Activities- Concrete Pour
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet
Interior Noise
Level (Leq dBA) Equipment
Usage
Factor1
threshold 3,077 Concrete Mixer Truck 0.4
Single-family Residence (West Parr
Avenue west of project site) 400 43.7
Concrete Mixer Truck

0.4 Rio Vista Middle School 1400 32.8 Concrete Pump Truck 0.16 River Bluff Elementary School 1550 32.0 Tractor 0.4

0.4 0.4

0.4 0.4
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Mixer Truck 81.0
Concrete Mixer Truck 81.0
Concrete Pump Truck 74.0
Tractor 80.0

85.8 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

67.7 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

50.0 85

56.8 82

56.0 84
Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)
Nightime Construction Activities- Concrete Pour
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
threshold 5,104 Concrete Mixer Truck 1
Single-family Residence (West Parr
Avenue west of project site) 400 Concrete Mixer Truck 1 Rio Vista Middle School 1400 Concrete Pump Truck 1
River Bluff Elementary School 1550 Tractor 1
1 1
1 1
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Mixer Truck 85.0
Concrete Mixer Truck 85.0
Concrete Pump Truck 82.0
Tractor 84.0

90.2 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

72.1 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

50.0 85

61.2 82

60.4 84
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)
Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Equipment
Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560
Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0Generator (<25KVA, VMS s 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jac 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0 Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0Mounted Impact Hammer ( 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100Vacuum Excavator (Vac-tru 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0Source:FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1U.S. Department of TransportationCA/T Construction Spec. 721.560 KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft)
Vibratory Roller 94 @ 25 77.3 @ 90 Distance to sensitive receptor Vibratory Roller 94 @ 25 80.0 @ 73 Threshold
Small bull dozer 58.0 @ 25 41.3 @ 90 80 vdb
Large bull dozer 87.0 @ 25 70.3 @ 90
Loaded trucks 86.0 @ 25 69.3 @ 90
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft)
Vibratory Roller 0.210 @ 25 0.031 @ 90 Distance to sensitive receptor Vibratory Roller 0.210 @ 25 0.198 @ 26 Threshold
Small bull dozer 0.003 @ 25 0.000 @ 90
Large bull dozer 0.089 @ 25 0.013 @ 90 0.2 ppv
Loaded trucks 0.076 @ 25 0.011 @ 90
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. FTA Report No. 0123. Washington, D.C. Accessed: December 20, 2020. Page Available:
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf Reference Noise Level
STEP 2A: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference vibration level (VdB) and distance.

Reference Noise Level
Computation of propagated vibration levels is based on the equations presented on pg. 185 of FTA 2018. Estimates of attenuated vibration levels do not account for reductions from intervening underground barriers or other underground structures of any type, or changes in soil type.

Distance Propagation Calculations for
Stationary Sources of Ground Vibration
STEP 1: Determine units in which to perform calculation. — If vibration decibels (VdB), then use Table A and proceed to Steps 2A and 3A. — If peak particle velocity (PPV), then use Table B and proceed to Steps 2B and 3B.

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.

KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft) 80 vdb
loaded truck 86 @ 25 74.6 @ 60 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 1 in PD loaded truck 86 @ 25 37.9 @ 1000 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 3 in PD loaded truck 86 @ 25 70.8 @ 80 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 5 in PD loaded truck 86 @ 25 79.9 @ 40 Threshold
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft) 0.2 ppv
loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.020 @ 60 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 1 in PD loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.000 @ 1000 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 3 in PD loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.013 @ 80 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 5 in PD loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.181 @ 14 Threshold
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.

KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft) 80 vdb
large bull dozer 87.0 @ 25 49.1 @ 460 Learn4Life Highschool large bull dozer 87.0 @ 25 79.9 @ 43 Threshold
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft) 0.2 ppv
large bull dozer 0.089 @ 25 0.001 @ 460 Learn4Life Highschool large bull dozer 0.089 @ 25 0.191 @ 15 Threshold
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.

Decommissioning
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 1,732 Concrete Saw 0.2
Learn4Life Highschool 450 Excavator 0.4
Nearest Residence
(West San Jose Ave and
North Gates Ave) 1400
Excavator

0.4 Excavator 0.4Dozer 0.4Dozer 0.4Ground Type SoftSource Height 8Receiver Height 5Ground Factor2 0.63 Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Saw 83.0Excavator 81.0Excavator 81.0Excavator 81.0Dozer 81.0Dozer 81.0 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1.2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level;U.F.= Usage Factor;G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2006: pg 6-23); andD = Distance from source to receiver.

50.4 88.5
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1
85858585

63.4 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)

50.0 Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet) Leq dBA at 50 feet3
90 Equipment Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560 Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0Generator (<25KVA, VMS signs) 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jack 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle) 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100Vacuum Excavator (Vac-truck) 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0chipper 75Source:FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1U.S. Department of TransportationCA/T Construction Spec. 721.560 Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources (HVAC and Car Wash) KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
HVAC units 70.0 @ 50 soft 10 5 0.62 46.4 @ 400HVAC units 70.0 @ 50 hard 10 5 0.00 44.9 @ 900Car Wash Dryers 69.0 @ 50 hard 10 5 0.00 43.9 @ 900Notes:

Sources:Computation of the ground factor is based on the equation presentd in Table 4-26 on pg. 86 of FTA 2018, where the distance of the reference noise leve can be adjusted and the usage factor is not applied (i.e., the usage factor is equal to 1).Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-noSTEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance). STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft), and enter the source and receiver heights. STEP 3: Select the distance to the receiver. Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type. Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018. Source Height (ft) Receiver Height (ft) Ground Factor Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources (Heavy Vehicle Loading) KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
Operational Noise Lmax at nearest residence 86.0 @ 50 hard 5 8 0.00 66.0 @ 500Operational Noise CNEL at nearest residence 88.7 @ 50 hard 5 8 0.00 68.7 @ 500Operational Noise Leq at nearest residence 84.0 @ 50 hard 5 8 0.00 64.0 @ 500

0.660.660.660.660.660.66
Notes:

Sources:Computation of the ground factor is based on the equation presentd in Table 4-26 on pg. 86 of FTA 2018, where the distance of the reference noise leve can be adjusted and the usage factor is not applied (i.e., the usage factor is equal to 1).Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-reportSTEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance). STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft), and enter the source and receiver heights. STEP 3: Select the distance to the receiver. Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type. Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018. Source Height (ft) Receiver Height (ft) Ground Factor Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
Tire Center 65.0 @ 50 hard 2 5 0.00 46.9 @ 400
Notes:

Sources:

Computation of the ground factor is based on the equation presentd in Table 4-26 on pg. 86 of FTA 2018, where the distance of the reference noise leve can be adjusted and the usage factor is not applied (i.e., the usage factor is equal to 1).

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available: <http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf>Accessed: March 5, 2020.

STEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance). STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft), and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to the
receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
Parking Lot Noise Calculation
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Number of automobiles per hour 2130
Number of buses per hour 0
Distance to sensitive receptor (feet) 400
distance sound level
Leq @ 50 65.7
Leq @ 400 47.6
Source
Federal Transit Administration. 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.

Washington, D.C. Available: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf.

Accessed February 4, 2019. See pages 45–47, including Equation 4-14.

Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources (Trash Compactor) KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
Trash Compactor 50.0 @ 50 hard 5 5 0.00 31.9 @ 400 Distance to nearest residence west of project site Notes:

STEP 3: Select the distance to the receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
High range of typical SENL (Haul Truck) 90.0 @ 50 soft 8 5 0.63 92.6 @ 40 nearest recpetor w/ sound wall High range of typical SENL (Haul Truck) 90.0 @ 50 hard 8 5 0.00 91.9 @ 40 nearest recpetor w/ sound wall

0.66 0.66

0.66 0.66
Notes:

Sources:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-noSTEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance).

STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft),
and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to
the receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics

Fresno City CouncilApril 18, 2024

Fresno City Council
April 18, 2024