24-1284 CEQA Addendum to the IS MND.pdf — Fresno City Council, October 10, 2024 (part 2 of 4)

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-2 (further continued from previous two pages)
to a City-approved institution or person who is capable of providing long-term preservation to allow future scientific study.

If prehistoric resources are found during the field survey or literature review, the resources shall be inventoried using appropriate State record forms and submit the forms to the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. The
resources shall be evaluated for significance. If the resources are found to be significant, measures shall be identified by the qualified archaeologist. Similar to above, appropriate
mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

In addition, appropriate mitigation for excavation and
construction activities in the vicinity of the resources found during the field survey or literature review shall include an archaeological monitor. The monitoring period shall be
determined by the qualified archaeologist. If additional prehistoric archaeological resources are found during
(continued on next page)
[see Page 14] [see Page 14]
Cultural Resources (continued):

MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 17 ends

CUL-2 (further continued from previous three pages)
excavation and/or construction activities, the procedure identified above for the discovery of unknown resources shall be followed.

Verification comments:
[see Page 14] [see Page 14]
CUL-3: Subsequent to a preliminary City review of the project grading plans, if there is evidence that a project will include excavation or construction activities within previously undisturbed soils, a field survey and literature search for unique paleontological/geological resources shall be
conducted. The following procedures shall be followed:

If unique paleontological/geological resources are not found during either the field survey or literature search, excavation and/or construction activities can commence. In the event that unique paleontological/geological resources are
discovered during excavation and/or construction activities, construction shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified paleontologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified paleontologist shall make recommendations to the City on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities
DARM X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 18 ends

CUL-3 (continued from previous page)
resources, including but not limited to, excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds. If the resources are determined to be significant, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any paleontological/geological resources recovered as a result of mitigation shall be provided to a City-approved institution or person who is capable of providing long-term preservation to allow future scientific study.

If unique paleontological/geological resources are found during the field survey or literature review, the resources shall be inventoried and evaluated for significance. If the resources are found to be significant, mitigation measures shall be identified by the qualified paleontologist. Similar to above, appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery
excavations of the finds. In addition, appropriate mitigation for excavation and construction activities in the vicinity of the (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 19 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-3 (further continued from previous two pages)
resources found during the field survey or literature review shall include a paleontological monitor. The monitoring period shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist. If additional paleontological/geological resources are found during excavation and/or construction activities, the procedure identified above for the discovery of unknown resources shall be followed.

Verification comments:
[see Page 17] [see Page 17]
CUL-4: In the event that human remains are unearthed
during excavation and grading activities of any future
development project, all activity shall cease immediately.

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(a). If the remains are
determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner shall within 24 hours notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall then contact the most (continued on next page)
Prior to
commencement
of, and during,
construction
activities

DARM X X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 20 ends

Cultural Resources (continued):

CUL-4 (continued from previous page)
likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who shall then serve as the consultant on how to proceed with the remains.

Pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b), upon the discovery of Native American remains, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located is not damaged or
disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. The
landowner shall discuss and confer with the descendants all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences for treatment.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 21 ends

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
HAZ-1: Re-designate the existing vacant land proposed for low density residential located northwest of the intersection of East Garland Avenue and North Dearing Avenue and located within Fresno Yosemite International Airport Zone 1-RPZ, to Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
DARM X
HAZ-2: Limit the proposed low density residential (1 to 3 dwelling units per acre) located northwest of the airport, and located within Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Zone 3-Inner Turning Area, to 2 dwelling units per acre or less.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
DARM X
HAZ-3: Re-designate the current area within Fresno
Yosemite International Airport Zone 5-Sideline located
northeast of the airport to Public Facilities-Airport or Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
DARM X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 22 ends

Hazards and Hazardous Materials (continued):

HAZ-4: Re-designate the current vacant lots at the northeast corner of Kearney Boulevard and South Thorne Avenue to
Public Facilities-Airport or Open Space.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
DARM X
HAZ-5: Prohibit residential uses within Safety Zone 1
northwest of the Hawes Avenue and South Thorne Avenue
intersection.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals
DARM X
HAZ-6: Establish an alternative Emergency Operations
Center in the event the current Emergency Operations Center is under redevelopment or blocked.

Verification comments:

Prior to
redevelopment
of the current
Emergency
Operations
Center
Fresno Fire
Department
and Mayor/
City Manager’s
Office
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 23 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality
HYD-1: The City shall develop and implement water
conservation measures to reduce the per capita water use to 215 gallons per capita per day.

Verification comments:

Prior to water
demand
exceeding water
supply
Department of
Public Utilities
(DPU)
X
HYD-2: The City shall continue to be an active participant in the Kings Water Authority and the implementation of the Kings Basin IRWMP.

Verification comments:

Ongoing DPU X
HYD-5.1: The City and partnering agencies shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan collection systems to less than significant.
• Implement the existing Storm Drainage Master Plan
(SDMP) for collection systems in drainage areas where the amount of imperviousness is unaffected by the change in land uses.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing
stormwater
drainage
facilities
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control
District
(FMFCD),
DARM, and
PW
X X X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 24 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.1 (continued from previous page)
• Update the SDMP in those drainage areas where the
amount of imperviousness increased due to the change in land uses to determine the changes in the collection
systems that would need to occur to provide adequate
capacity for the stormwater runoff from the increased
imperviousness.
• Implement the updated SDMP to provide stormwater
collection systems that have sufficient capacity to convey the peak runoff rates from the areas of increased
imperviousness.

Require developments that increase site imperviousness to install, operate, and maintain FMFCD approved on-site
detention systems to reduce the peak runoff rates resulting from the increased imperviousness to the peak runoff rates that will not exceed the capacity of the existing stormwater collection systems.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 25 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.2: The City and partnering agencies shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan retention basins to less than significant:

Consult the SDMP to analyze the impacts to existing and planned retention basins to determine remedial measures required to reduce the impact on retention basin capacity to less than significant. Remedial measures would include:
• Increase the size of the retention basin through the purchase of more land or deepening the basin or a combination for planned retention basins.
• Increase the size of the emergency relief pump capacity required to pump excess runoff volume out of the basin and into adjacent canal that convey the stormwater to a disposal facility for existing retention basins.
• Require developments that increase runoff volume to install, operate, and maintain, Low Impact Development (LID)
measures to reduce runoff volume to the runoff volume that will not exceed the capacity of the existing retention basins.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing retention
basin facilities
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
X X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 26 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.3: The City and partnering agencies shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan urban detention (stormwater quality) basins to less than significant.

Consult the SDMP to determine the impacts to the urban
detention basin weir overflow rates and determine remedial measures required to reduce the impact on the detention basin capacity to less than significant. Remedial measures would include:
• Modify overflow weir to maintain the suspended solids removal rates adopted by the FMFCD Board of Directors.
• Increase the size of the urban detention basin to increase residence time by purchasing more land. The existing
detention basins are already at the adopted design depth. • Require developments that increase runoff volume to
install, operate, and maintain, Low Impact Development
(LID) measures to reduce peak runoff rates and runoff
volume to the runoff rates and volumes that will not exceed the weir overflow rates of the existing urban detention basins.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing urban
detention basin
(stormwater
quality) facilities
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 27 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):

HYD-5.4: The City shall implement the following measures to reduce the impacts on the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage Master Plan pump disposal systems to less than significant.
• Consult the SDMP to determine the extent and degree to which the capacity of the existing pump system will be
exceeded.
• Require new developments to install, operate, and maintain FMFCD design standard on-site detention facilities to reduce peak stormwater runoff rates to existing planned peak runoff rates.
• Provide additional pump system capacity to maximum
allowed by existing permitting to increase the capacity to match or exceed the peak runoff rates determined by the SDMP.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceedance of
capacity of
existing pump
disposal systems
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 28 ends

Hydrology and Water Quality (continued):
• HYD-5.5: The City shall work with FMFCD to develop and adopt an update to the SDMP for the Southeast
Development Area that would be adequately designed to
collect, convey and dispose of runoff at the rates and
volumes which would be generated by the planned land
uses in that area.

Verification comments:

Prior to
development
approvals in the
Southeast
Development
Area
FMFCD,
DARM, and
PW
X
Public Services:

PS-1: As future fire facilities are planned, the fire department shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur.

Typical impacts from fire facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce these impacts includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks on the fire department sites. • Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation and a “keep clear zone” during emergency responses.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures on the fire department sites.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future fire
department
facilities
DARM X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 29 ends

Public Services (continued):

PS-2: As future police facilities are planned, the police department shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from police facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from police department facilities includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks on the police department sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures on the police department sites.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future Police
Department
facilities
DARM X
PS-3: As future public and private school facilities are planned, school districts shall evaluate if specific
environmental effects would occur with regard to public schools, and DARM shall evaluate other school facilities.

Typical impacts from school facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from school facilities includes:
(continued on next page)
During the
planning process
for future school
facilities
DARM, local
school districts,
and the
Division of the
State Architect
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 30 ends

Public Services (continued):

PS-3 (continued from previous page)
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures for stadium lights.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
PS-4: As future parks and recreational facilities are planned, the City shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from school facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts from park and recreational facilities includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on lighting fixtures for outdoor play area/field lights.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future park
and recreation
facilities

DARM X X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 31 ends

Public Services (continued):

PS-5: As future detention, court, library, and hospital facilities are planned, the appropriate agencies shall evaluate if specific environmental effects would occur. Typical impacts from court, library, and hospital facilities include noise, traffic, and lighting. Typical mitigation to reduce potential impacts includes:
• Noise: Barriers and setbacks placed on school sites.
• Traffic: Traffic devices for circulation.
• Lighting: Provision of hoods and deflectors on outdoor lighting fixtures.

Verification comments:

During the
planning process
for future
detention, court,
library, and
hospital facilities
DARM, to the
extent that
agencies
constructing
these facilities
are subject to
City of Fresno
regulation
X
Utilities and Service Systems
USS-1: The City shall develop and implement a wastewater master plan update.

Verification comments:

Prior to
wastewater
conveyance and
treatment
demand
exceeding
capacity
DPU X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 32 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-2: Prior to exceeding existing wastewater treatment capacity, the City shall evaluate the wastewater system and shall not approve additional development that contributes wastewater to the wastewater treatment facility that could exceed capacity until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct the following improvements:
• Construct an approximately 70 MGD expansion of the
Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility
and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the
generation of wastewater is increased.
• Construct an approximately 0.49 MGD expansion of the
North Facility and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the generation of wastewater is increased.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
existing
wastewater
treatment
capacity
DPU X
USS-3: Prior to exceeding existing wastewater treatment capacity, the City shall evaluate the wastewater system and shall not approve additional development that contributes wastewater to the wastewater treatment facility that could exceed capacity until additional capacity is provided. After (continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
existing
wastewater
treatment
capacity
DPU X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 33 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-3 (continued from previous page)
approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct the following improvements:
• Construct an approximately 24 MGD wastewater treatment facility within the Southeast Development Area and obtain revised waste discharge requirements as the generation of wastewater is increased.
• Construct an approximately 9.6 MGD expansion of the
Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility
and obtain revised waste discharge permits as the
generation of wastewater is increased.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
USS-4: A Traffic Control/Traffic Management Plan to address traffic impacts during construction of water and sewer facilities shall be prepared and implemented, subject to approval by the City (and Fresno County, when work is being done in unincorporated area roadways). The plan shall identify
access and parking restrictions, pavement markings and
signage, and hours of construction and for deliveries. It shall include haul routes, the notification plan, and coordination with emergency service providers and schools.

Verification comments:

Prior to
construction of
water and sewer
facilities
PW for work in
the City; PW
and Fresno
County Public
Works and
Planning when
unincorporated
area roadways
are involved
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 34 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-5: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing
wastewater collection system facilities, the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection system and shall not approve
additional development that would generate additional
wastewater and exceed the capacity of a facility until
additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the following capacity improvements shall be provided. • Orange Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Dakota and Jensen Avenues. Approximately
37,240 feet of new sewer main shall be installed and
approximately 5,760 feet of existing sewer main shall be rehabilitated. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 27 inches to 42 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are RS03A, RL02, C01-REP, C02-REP, C03-REP, C04-REP,
C05-REP, C06-REL and C07-REP.
• Marks Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Clinton Avenue and Kearney Boulevard.

Approximately 12,150 feet of new sewer main shall be
installed. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 33 inches to 60 inches in diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are
CM1-REP and CM2-REP.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
wastewater
collection system
facilities
DPU X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 35 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-5 (continued from previous page)
• North Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Polk and Fruit Avenues and also between Orange
and Maple Avenues. Approximately 25,700 feet of new
sewer main shall be installed. The size of the new sewer main shall range from 48 inches to 66 inches in diameter.

The associated project designations in the 2006
Wastewater Master Plan are CN1-REL1 and CN3-REL1.
• Ashlan Avenue Trunk Sewer: This facility shall be improved between Hughes and West Avenues and also between
Fruit and Blackstone Avenues. Approximately 9,260 feet of new sewer main shall be installed. The size of the new
sewer main shall range from 24 inches to 36 inches in
diameter. The associated project designations in the 2006 Wastewater Master Plan are CA1-REL and CA2-REP.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 36 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-6: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing 28 pipeline segments shown in Figures 1 and 2 in Appendix J-1, the City shall evaluate the wastewater collection system and shall not approve additional development that would generate additional wastewater and exceed the capacity of one of the 28 pipeline segments until additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing 28
pipeline segments shown in
Figures 1 and 2
in Appendix J-1
of the MEIR
DPU X
USS-7: Prior to exceeding existing water supply capacity, the City shall evaluate the water supply system and shall not approve additional development that demand additional water until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the following capacity improvements shall be provided.
• Construct an approximately 80 million gallon per day
(MGD) surface water treatment facility near the intersection of Armstrong and Olive Avenues, in accordance with
Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the City of Fresno Metropolitan Water Resources Management Plan Update (2014 Metro
Plan Update) Phase 2 Report, dated January 2012.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
existing water
supply capacity
DPU X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 37 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-7 (continued from previous page)
• Construct an approximately 30 MGD expansion of the
existing northeast surface water treatment facility for a total capacity of 60 MGD, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct an approximately 20 MGD surface water
treatment facility in the southwest portion of the City, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
USS-8: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance system and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided by approximately 2025.
• Construct 65 new groundwater wells, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update. (continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
water
conveyance
facilities
DPU X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 38 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-8 (continued from previous page)
• Construct a 2.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T2) near the intersection of Clovis and
California Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 3.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T3) near the intersection of Temperance and
Dakota Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 3.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T4) in the Downtown Planning Area, in
accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T5) near the intersection of Ashlan and
Chestnut Avenues, in accordance with Chapter 9 and
Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (Reservoir T6) near the intersection of Ashlan Avenue and Highway 99, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 39 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-8 (continued from previous two pages)
• Construct 50.3 miles of regional water transmission
mains ranging in size from 24-inch to 48-inch diameter, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014
Metro Plan Update.
• Construct 95.9 miles of 16-inch diameter transmission grid mains, in accordance with Chapter 9 and Figure 9-1 of the 2014 Metro Plan Update.

Verification comments:
[see Page 37] [see Page 37]
USS-9: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing water conveyance facilities, the City shall evaluate the water conveyance system and shall not approve additional
development that would demand additional water and exceed the capacity of a facility until additional capacity is provided.

The following capacity improvements shall be provided after approximately the year 2025 and additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior to exceedance of capacity within the water conveyance facilities to accommodate full buildout of the General Plan Update.
(continued on next page)
Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing
water
conveyance
facilities
DPU X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 40 ends

Utilities and Service Systems (continued):

USS-9 (continued from previous page)
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (SEDA Reservoir 1) within the northern part of the
Southeast Development Area.
• Construct a 4.0 million gallon potable water reservoir (SEDA Reservoir 2) within the southern part of the
Southeast Development Area.

Additional water conveyance facilities shall be provided prior to exceedance of capacity within the water conveyance
facilities to accommodate full buildout of the General Plan Update.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems - Hydrology and Water Quality USS-10: In order to maintain Fresno Irrigation District canal operability, FMFCD shall maintain operational intermittent flows during the dry season, within defined channel capacity and downstream capture capabilities, for recharge.

Verification comments:

During the dry
season
Fresno
Irrigation
District (FID)
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 41 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources:

USS-11: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage service outside of urbanized areas:
(a) FMFCD shall conduct preliminary investigations on
undeveloped lands outside of highly urbanized areas.

These investigations shall examine wetland hydrology,
vegetation and soil types. These preliminary
investigations shall be the basis for making a
determination on whether or not more in-depth wetland
studies shall be necessary. If the proposed project site does not exhibit wetland hydrology, support a
prevalence of wetland vegetation and wetland soil types then no further action is required.
(b) Where proposed activities could have an impact on
areas verified by the Corps as jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. (urban and rural streams, seasonal
wetlands, and vernal pools), FMFCD shall obtain the
necessary Clean Water Act, Section 404 permits for
activities where fill material shall be placed in a wetland, obstruct the flow or circulation of waters of the United States, impair or reduce the reach of such waters. As
part of FMFCD’s Memorandum of Understanding with
CDFG, Section 404 and 401 permits would be obtained
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and from the
(continued on next page)
Prior to
development
approvals
outside of highly
urbanized areas
California
Regional
Water Quality
Control Board
(RWQCB), and
USACE
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 42 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-11 (continued from previous page)
Regional Water Quality Control Board for any activity
involving filling of jurisdictional waters). At a minimum, to meet “no net loss policy,” the permits shall require replacement of wetland habitat at a 1:1 ratio.
(c) Where proposed activities could have an impact on
areas verified by the Corps as jurisdictional wetlands or waters of the U.S. (urban and rural streams, seasonal
wetlands, and vernal pools), FMFCD shall submit and
implement a wetland mitigation plan based on the
wetland acreage verified by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. The wetland mitigation plan shall be
prepared by a qualified biologist or wetland scientist
experienced in wetland creation, and shall include the
following or equally effective elements:
i. Specific location, size, and existing hydrology and
soils within the wetland creation area.
ii. Wetland mitigation techniques, seed source,
planting specifications, and required buffer
setbacks. In addition, the mitigation plan shall
ensure adequate water supply is provided to the
created wetlands in order to maintain the proper
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 43 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-11 (continued from previous two pages)
hydrologic regimes required by the different types
of wetlands created. Provisions to ensure the
wetland water supply is maintained in perpetuity
shall be included in the plan.
iii. A monitoring program for restored, enhanced,
created, and preserved wetlands on the project
site. A monitoring program is required to meet three
objectives; 1) establish a wetland creation success
criteria to be met; 2) to specify monitoring
methodology; 3) to identify as far as is possible,
specific remedial actions that will be required in
order to achieve the success criteria; and 4) to
document the degree of success achieved in
establishing wetland vegetation.
(d) A monitoring plan shall be developed and implemented by a qualified biologist to monitor results of any on-site wetland restoration and creation for five years. The
monitoring plan shall include specific success criteria, frequency and timing of monitoring, and assessment of
whether or not maintenance activities are being carried out and how these shall be adjusted if necessary.
(continued on next page)
[see Page 41] [see Page 41]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 44 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-11 (continued from previous three pages)
If monitoring reveals that success criteria are not being met, remedial habitat creation or restoration should be designed and implemented by a qualified biologist and
subject to five years of monitoring as described above.

Or
(e) In lieu of developing a mitigation plan that outlines the avoidance, purchase, or creation of wetlands, FMFCD
could purchase mitigation credits through a Corps
approved Mitigation Bank.

Verification comments:
[see Page 41] [see Page 41]
USS-12: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage service outside in areas that support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools:
(a) During facility design and prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities in areas that support seasonal
wetlands or vernal pools, FMFCD shall conduct a
preliminary rare plant assessment. The assessment will
determine the likelihood on whether or not the project
site could support rare plants. If it is determined that the project site would not support rare plants, then no further (continued on next page)
During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
ground
disturbing
activities in
areas that
support seasonal
wetlands or
vernal pools
California
Department of
Fish & Wildlife
(CDFW) and
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
(USFWS)
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 45 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-12 (continued from previous page)
action is required. However, if the project site has the potential to support rare plants; then a rare plant survey shall be conducted. Rare plant surveys shall be
conducted by qualified biologists in accordance with the most current CDFG/USFWS guidelines or protocols and
shall be conducted at the time of year when the plants in question are identifiable.
(b) Based on the results of the survey, prior to design approval, FMFCD shall coordinate with CDFG and/or
implement a Section 7 consultation with USFWS, shall
determine whether the project facility would result in a significant impact to any special status plant species.

Evaluation of project impacts shall consider the
following:
• The status of the species in question (e.g., officially listed by the State or Federal Endangered Species
Acts).
• The relative density and distribution of the on-site
occurrence versus typical occurrences of the
species in question.
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 46 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-12 (continued from previous two pages)
• The habitat quality of the on-site occurrence relative to historic, current or potential distribution of the
population.
(c) Prior to design approval, and in consultation with the CDFG and/or the USFWS, FMFCD shall prepare and
implement a mitigation plan, in accordance with any
applicable State and/or federal statutes or laws, that
reduces impacts to a less than significant level.

Verification comments:
[see Page 44] [see Page 44]
USS-13: When FMFCD proposes to provide drainage service outside in areas that support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools:
(a) During facility design and prior to initiation of ground disturbing activities in areas that support seasonal
wetlands or vernal pools, FMFCD shall conduct a
preliminary survey to determine the presence of listed
vernal pool crustaceans.
(continued on next page)
During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
ground
disturbing
activities in
areas that
support seasonal
wetlands or
vernal pools
CDFW and
USFWS
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 47 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-13 (continued from previous page)
(b) If potential habitat (vernal pools, seasonally inundated areas) or fairy shrimp exist within areas proposed to be disturbed, FMFCD shall complete the first and second
phase of fairy shrimp presence or absence surveys. If an absence finding is determined and accepted by the
USFWS, then no further mitigation shall be required for fairy shrimp.
(c) If fairy shrimp are found to be present within vernal pools or other areas of inundation to be impacted by the
implementation of storm drainage facilities, FMFCD shall mitigate impacts on fairy shrimp habitat in accordance
with the USFWS requirements of the Programmatic
Biological Opinion. This shall include on-site or off-site creation and/or preservation of fairy shrimp habitat at ratios ranging from 3:1 to 5:1 depending on the habitat impacted and the choice of on-site or off-site mitigation.

Or mitigation shall be the purchase of mitigation credit through an accredited mitigation bank.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 48 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-14: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in an area where elderberry bushes may occur:
(a) During facility design and prior to initiation of
construction activities, FMFCD shall conduct a projectspecific survey for all potential Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (VELB) habitats (elderberry shrubs),
including a stem count and an assessment of historic or current VELB habitat.
(b) FMFCD shall avoid and protect all potential identified VELB habitat where feasible.
(c) Where avoidance is infeasible, develop and implement a VELB mitigation plan in accordance with the most
current USFWS mitigation guidelines for unavoidable
take of VELB habitat pursuant to either Section 7 or
Section 10(a) of the Federal Endangered Species Act.

The mitigation plan shall include, but might not be limited to, relocation of elderberry shrubs, planting of elderberry shrubs, and monitoring of relocated and planted
elderberry shrubs.

Verification comments:

During facility
design and prior
to initiation of
construction
activities
CDFW and
USFWS
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 49 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-15: Prior to ground disturbing activities during nesting season (March through July) for a project that supports bird nesting habitat, FMFCD shall conduct a survey of trees. If nests are found during the survey, a qualified biologist shall assess the nesting activity on the project site. If active nests are located, no construction activities shall be allowed within 250 feet of the nest until the young have fledged. If
construction activities are planned during the no n-breeding period (August through February), a nest survey is not
necessary.

Verification comments:

Prior to ground
disturbing
activities during
nesting season
(March through
July) for a
project that
supports bird
nesting habitat
CDFW and
USFWS
X
USS-16: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in an area that supports bird nesting habitat:
(a) FMFCD shall conduct a pre-construction breedingseason survey (approximately February 1 through August 31) of proposed project sites in suitable habitat (levee and canal berms, open grasslands with suitable burrows) during the same calendar year that construction is
planned to begin. If phased construction procedures are planned for the proposed project, the results of the above survey shall be valid only for the season when it is
conducted.
(continued on next page)
Prior to ground
disturbing
activities during
nesting season
(March through
July) for a
project that
supports bird
nesting habitat
CDFW and
USFWS
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 50 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-16 (continued from previous page)
(b) During the construction stage, FMFCD shall avoid all burrowing owl nest sites potentially disturbed by project construction during the breeding season while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. The occupied nest
site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to
determine when the nest is no longer used. Avoidance
shall include the establishment of a 160-foot diameter
non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site.

Disturbance of any nest sites shall only occur outside of the breeding season and when the nests are unoccupied
based on monitoring by a qualified biologist. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary
construction fencing.

Based on approval by CDFG, pre-construction and prebreeding season exclusion measures may be implemented to preclude burrowing owl occupation of the project site prior to project-related disturbance. Burrowing owls can be passively excluded from potential nest sites in the construction area, either by closing the burrows or placing one-way doors in the burrows according to current CDFG protocol. Burrows shall be examined not more than 30 days before construction to
ensure that no owls have recolonized the area of construction. (continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 51 ends

Utilities and Service Systems - Biological Resources (continued):

USS-16 (continued from previous two pages)
For each burrow destroyed, a new burrow shall be created (by installing artificial burrows at a ratio of 2:1 on protected lands nearby.

Verification comments:
[see Page 49] [see Page 49]
USS-17: When FMFCD proposes to construct drainage
facilities in the San Joaquin River corridor:
(a) FMFCD shall not conduct instream activities in the San Joaquin River between October 15 and April 15. If this is not feasible, FMFCD shall consult with the National
Marine Fisheries Service and CDFW on the appropriate
measures to be implemented in order to protect listed
salmonids in the San Joaquin River.
(b) Riparian vegetation shading the main channel that is removed or damaged shall be replaced at a ratio and
quantity sufficient to maintain the existing shading of the channel. The location of replacement trees on or within (continued on next page)
During instream
activities
conducted
between
October 15 and
April 15
National
Marine
Fisheries
Service
(NMFS),
CDFW, and
Central Valley
Flood
Protection
Board
(CVFPB)
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 52 ends

Utilities and Service Systems / Biological Resources (continued):

USS-17 (continued from previous page)
FMFCD berms, detention ponds or river channels shall
be approved by FMFCD and the Central Valley Flood
Protection Board.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems – Recreation / Trails:

USS-18: When FMFCD updates its District Service Plan:

Prior to final design approval of all elements of the District Services Plan, FMFCD shall consult with Fresno County, City of Fresno, and City of Clovis to determine if any element would temporarily disrupt or permanently displace adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities as a result of the proposed District Services Plan. If the proposed project would not temporarily disrupt or permanently displace adopted existing or planned trails, no further mitigation is necessary. If the proposed project would have an effect on the trails and associated facilities, FMFCD shall implement the following:
(continued on next page)
Prior to final
design approval
of all elements of
the District
Services Plan

DARM, PW,
City of Clovis,
and County of
Fresno
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 53 ends

Utilities and Service Systems – Recreation / Trails (continued):

USS-18 (continued from previous page)
(a) If short-term disruption of adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities occur, FMFCD shall consult and coordinate with Fresno County, City of Fresno, and City of Clovis to temporarily re-route the trails and associated facilities.
(b) If permanent displacement of the adopted existing or planned trails and associated recreational facilities occur, the appropriate design modifications to prevent permanent displacement shall be implemented in the final project
design or FMFCD shall replace these facilities.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems – Air Quality:

USS-19: When District drainage facilities are constructed, FMFCD shall:
(a) Minimize idling time of construction equipment vehicles to no more than ten minutes, or require that engines be shut off when not in use.
(continued on next page)
During storm
water drainage
facility
construction
activities
Fresno
Metropolitan
Flood Control
District and

SJVAPCD
X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 54 ends

Utilities and Service Systems – Air Quality (continued):

USS-19 (continued from previous page)
(b) Construction shall be curtailed as much as possible when the Air Quality Index (AQI) is above 150. AQI forecasts can be found on the SJVAPCD web site.
(c) Off-road trucks should be equipped with on-road engines if possible.
(d) Construction equipment should have engines that meet the current off-road engine emission standard (as certified by CARB), or be re-powered with an engine that meets this
standard.

Verification comments:
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]
Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Storm Water Drainage Facilities:

USS-20: Prior to exceeding capacity within the existing storm water drainage facilities, the City shall coordinate with FMFCD to evaluate the storm water drainage system and shall not approve additional development that would convey additional storm water to a facility that would experience an exceedance of capacity until the necessary additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
capacity within
the existing storm
water drainage
facilities

FMFCD, PW,
and DARM
X X
MEIR MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR EA NO. P21-00726 April 6, 2021

MITIGATION MEASURE WHEN

IMPLEMENTED

COMPLIANCE

VERIFIED BY A B C D E F
A - Incorporated into Project C - Mitigation in Process E - Part of City-Wide Program B - Mitigated D - Responsible Agency Contacted F - Not Applicable

Page 55 ends

Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Water Supply Capacity:

USS-21: Prior to exceeding existing water supply capacity, the City shall evaluate the water supply system and shall not approve additional development that demand additional water until additional capacity is provided. By approximately the year 2025, the City shall construct an approximately 25,000 AF/year tertiary recycled water expansion to the FresnoClovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility in accordance with the 2013 Recycled Water Master Plan and the 2014 City of Fresno Metropolitan Water Resources
Management Plan update.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure USS-5 is also required prior to approximately the year 2025.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
existing water
supply capacity
DPU and
DARM
X X
Utilities and Service Systems – Adequacy of Landfill Capacity:

USS-22: Prior to exceeding landfill capacity, the City shall evaluate additional landfill locations and shall not approve additional development that could contribute solid waste to a landfill that is at capacity until additional capacity is provided.

Verification comments:

Prior to
exceeding
landfill capacity
DPU and
DARM
X

CITY OF FRESNO

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

PROJECT SPECIFIC MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. P21-00726
Project/EA No. P21-00726 Date: April 6, 2021
Project Specific Monitoring Checklist Page 1
Environmental Assessment No. P21-00726
Mitigation Measure Implemented By When
Implemented Verified By
HAZ-1: Prior to project construction activities, the project proponent shall:
• Collect soil samples to evaluate for the potential presence of organochlorine pesticides, and arsenic related to the past agricultural operations at the site;
• Collect soil samples from the vicinity of the historical structures to evaluate the potential presence of termiticides or lead from leadbased paint; • Abandon any irrigation wells and any other wells or septic systems that are uncovered during development activities in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations;
• Evaluate any soils uncovered during development activities that exhibit evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon impacts, such as staining or odors;
• If USTs are discovered during future assessment activities, take the appropriate steps to remove.

NOISE-1: During all construction activities, the project proponent shall take the following measures:
• During construction, all construction equipment shall be equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices;
• Equipment shall be located in staging areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction;
• Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use; • Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging.

Appendix A
CalEEMod and Energy Calculations
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on project size and details.

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition - Assumes 20,000 building sf for demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Project assumed not to generate net new trips, but instead would redistribute existing trips (see Traffic Study - Kittelson & Associates).

Energy Use - Lighting

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 48.50 Acre 48.50 2,112,660.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Operational Year 2021
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Fresno Sports and Park Complex
Fresno County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 55.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 740.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 50.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 75.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 55.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 10.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.00 0.02
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4.17 1.59
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 346.00 132.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 887.00 338.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 177.00 68.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 22.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 16.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 57,786,845.46 22,042,404.97 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1746 1.7367 1.2865 2.8800e0030.2814 0.0745 0.3559 0.1189 0.0690 0.1879 0.0000 256.7305 256.7305 0.0600 0.0000 258.2312 Maximum 0.1746 1.7367 1.2865 2.8800e0030.2814 0.0745 0.3559 0.1189 0.0690 0.1879 0.0000 256.7305 256.7305 0.0600 0.0000 258.2312 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1746 1.7367 1.2865 2.8800e0030.2814 0.0745 0.3559 0.1189 0.0690 0.1879 0.0000 256.7303 256.7303 0.0600 0.0000 258.2310 Maximum 0.1746 1.7367 1.2865 2.8800e0030.2814 0.0745 0.3559 0.1189 0.0690 0.1879 0.0000 256.7303 256.7303 0.0600 0.0000 258.2310 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0199 0.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12.2919 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3228 0.0000 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 22.4434 22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313 Total 0.0199 0.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.3228 34.7362 35.0589 0.0206 3.2000e00435.6719 Unmitigated Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 3-1-2021 5-31-2021 1.4481 1.4481
2 6-1-2021 8-31-2021 0.4533 0.4533
Highest 1.4481 1.4481
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2021 3/26/2021 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/27/2021 4/9/2021 5 10 3 Grading Grading 4/10/2021 5/21/2021 5 30
4 Building Construction Building Construction 5/22/2021 6/22/2021 5 22 5 Paving Paving 6/23/2021 7/20/2021 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/21/2021 8/17/2021 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 9.8400e0030.0000 9.8400e0031.4900e0030.0000 1.4900e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e0040.0155 0.0155 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 34.0008 34.0008 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Total 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e0049.8400e0030.0155 0.0254 1.4900e0030.0144 0.0159 0.0000 34.0008 34.0008 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 91.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 338.00 132.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.4000e0040.0118 1.6500e0034.0000e0057.8000e0044.0000e0058.2000e0042.1000e0044.0000e0052.5000e0040.0000 3.4235 3.4235 3.0000e0040.0000 3.4309 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e0043.7000e0043.7800e0031.0000e0051.2000e0031.0000e0051.2100e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 1.0023 1.0023 2.0000e0050.0000 1.0030 Total 9.4000e0040.0122 5.4300e0035.0000e0051.9800e0035.0000e0052.0300e0035.3000e0045.0000e0055.8000e0040.0000 4.4258 4.4258 3.2000e0040.0000 4.4339 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 9.8400e0030.0000 9.8400e0031.4900e0030.0000 1.4900e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e0040.0155 0.0155 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 34.0007 34.0007 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Total 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e0049.8400e0030.0155 0.0254 1.4900e0030.0144 0.0159 0.0000 34.0007 34.0007 9.5700e0030.0000 34.2400 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.6000e0042.2000e0042.2700e0031.0000e0057.2000e0040.0000 7.2000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.6014 0.6014 1.0000e0050.0000 0.6018 Total 3.6000e0042.2000e0042.2700e0031.0000e0057.2000e0040.0000 7.2000e0041.9000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.6014 0.6014 1.0000e0050.0000 0.6018 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0903 0.0000 0.0903 0.0497 0.0000 0.0497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e0040.0102 0.0102 9.4000e0039.4000e0030.0000 16.7178 16.7178 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8530 Total 0.0194 0.2025 0.1058 1.9000e0040.0903 0.0102 0.1006 0.0497 9.4000e0030.0591 0.0000 16.7178 16.7178 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8530 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1301 0.0000 0.1301 0.0540 0.0000 0.0540 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0629 0.6960 0.4632 9.3000e0040.0298 0.0298 0.0274 0.0274 0.0000 81.7425 81.7425 0.0264 0.0000 82.4034 Total 0.0629 0.6960 0.4632 9.3000e0040.1301 0.0298 0.1599 0.0540 0.0274 0.0814 0.0000 81.7425 81.7425 0.0264 0.0000 82.4034 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2000e0037.3000e0047.5700e0032.0000e0052.4000e0031.0000e0052.4100e0036.4000e0041.0000e0056.5000e0040.0000 2.0047 2.0047 5.0000e0050.0000 2.0059 Total 1.2000e0037.3000e0047.5700e0032.0000e0052.4000e0031.0000e0052.4100e0036.4000e0041.0000e0056.5000e0040.0000 2.0047 2.0047 5.0000e0050.0000 2.0059 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1301 0.0000 0.1301 0.0540 0.0000 0.0540 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0629 0.6960 0.4632 9.3000e0040.0298 0.0298 0.0274 0.0274 0.0000 81.7424 81.7424 0.0264 0.0000 82.4033 Total 0.0629 0.6960 0.4632 9.3000e0040.1301 0.0298 0.1599 0.0540 0.0274 0.0814 0.0000 81.7424 81.7424 0.0264 0.0000 82.4033 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0209 0.1918 0.1823 3.0000e0040.0105 0.0105 9.9100e0039.9100e0030.0000 25.4801 25.4801 6.1500e0030.0000 25.6338 Total 0.0209 0.1918 0.1823 3.0000e0040.0105 0.0105 9.9100e0039.9100e0030.0000 25.4801 25.4801 6.1500e0030.0000 25.6338 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.3900e0030.1634 0.0249 4.1000e0049.6200e0034.4000e0040.0101 2.7800e0034.2000e0043.2000e0030.0000 38.7896 38.7896 4.6800e0030.0000 38.9066 Worker 0.0148 9.0600e0030.0938 2.7000e0040.0297 1.9000e0040.0299 7.9000e0031.7000e0048.0700e0030.0000 24.8447 24.8447 6.1000e0040.0000 24.8600 Total 0.0192 0.1725 0.1187 6.8000e0040.0393 6.3000e0040.0400 0.0107 5.9000e0040.0113 0.0000 63.6343 63.6343 5.2900e0030.0000 63.7667 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0209 0.1918 0.1823 3.0000e0040.0105 0.0105 9.9100e0039.9100e0030.0000 25.4801 25.4801 6.1500e0030.0000 25.6338 Total 0.0209 0.1918 0.1823 3.0000e0040.0105 0.0105 9.9100e0039.9100e0030.0000 25.4801 25.4801 6.1500e0030.0000 25.6338 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0126 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e0046.7800e0036.7800e0036.2400e0036.2400e0030.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1854 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0126 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e0046.7800e0036.7800e0036.2400e0036.2400e0030.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1854 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e0043.7000e0043.7800e0031.0000e0051.2000e0031.0000e0051.2100e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 1.0023 1.0023 2.0000e0050.0000 1.0030 Total 6.0000e0043.7000e0043.7800e0031.0000e0051.2000e0031.0000e0051.2100e0033.2000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0040.0000 1.0023 1.0023 2.0000e0050.0000 1.0030 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0126 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e0046.7800e0036.7800e0036.2400e0036.2400e0030.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1854 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0126 0.1292 0.1465 2.3000e0046.7800e0036.7800e0036.2400e0036.2400e0030.0000 20.0235 20.0235 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1854 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7100e0031.6600e0030.0172 5.0000e0055.4400e0033.0000e0055.4700e0031.4400e0033.0000e0051.4800e0030.0000 4.5439 4.5439 1.1000e0040.0000 4.5468 Total 2.7100e0031.6600e0030.0172 5.0000e0055.4400e0033.0000e0055.4700e0031.4400e0033.0000e0051.4800e0030.0000 4.5439 4.5439 1.1000e0040.0000 4.5468 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1900e0030.0153 0.0182 3.0000e0059.4000e0049.4000e0049.4000e0049.4000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.8000e0040.0000 2.5576 Total 2.1900e0030.0153 0.0182 3.0000e0059.4000e0049.4000e0049.4000e0049.4000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.8000e0040.0000 2.5576 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7100e0031.6600e0030.0172 5.0000e0055.4400e0033.0000e0055.4700e0031.4400e0033.0000e0051.4800e0030.0000 4.5439 4.5439 1.1000e0040.0000 4.5468 Total 2.7100e0031.6600e0030.0172 5.0000e0055.4400e0033.0000e0055.4700e0031.4400e0033.0000e0051.4800e0030.0000 4.5439 4.5439 1.1000e0040.0000 4.5468 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6

5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.487139 0.031901 0.169199 0.121386 0.017033 0.004732 0.033028 0.124746 0.002366 0.001590 0.005154 0.001097 0.000629 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12.2919 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 12.2919 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 42253.2 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401 Total 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0199 0.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004 Unmitigated 0.0199 0.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 42253.2 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401 Total 12.2919 5.6000e0041.1000e00412.3401
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e0050.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004 Total 0.0199 0.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004 Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e0050.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004 Total 0.0199 0.0000 4.5000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.7000e0048.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.2000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313
Unmitigated 22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

22.0424

22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313
Total 22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313
Unmitigated

7.0 Water Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

22.0424

22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313
Total 22.4434 1.0100e0032.1000e00422.5313
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996
Unmitigated 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 1.59 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996
Total 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 1.59 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996
Total 0.3228 0.0191 0.0000 0.7996
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 30 Date: 1/14/2021 8:34 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on project size and details.

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition - Assumes 20,000 building sf for demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Project assumed not to generate net new trips, but instead would redistribute existing trips (see Traffic Study - Kittelson & Associates).

Energy Use - Lighting

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 48.50 Acre 48.50 2,112,660.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Operational Year 2021
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Fresno Sports and Park Complex
Fresno County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 55.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 740.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 50.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 75.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 55.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 10.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.00 0.02
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4.17 1.59
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 346.00 132.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 887.00 338.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 177.00 68.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 22.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 16.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 57,786,845.46 22,042,404.97 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2819 46.4452 31.4632 0.0919 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 9,222.697 0 9,222.697
0 1.9468 0.0000 9,250.893
1 Maximum 4.2819 46.4452 31.4632 0.0919 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 9,222.697 0 9,222.697
0 1.9468 0.0000 9,250.893
1 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2819 46.4452 31.4632 0.0919 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 9,222.697 0 9,222.697
0 1.9468 0.0000 9,250.893
1 Maximum 4.2819 46.4452 31.4632 0.0919 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 9,222.697 0 9,222.697
0 1.9468 0.0000 9,250.893
1 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 0.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0113 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 0.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0113 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2021 3/26/2021 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/27/2021 4/9/2021 5 10 3 Grading Grading 4/10/2021 5/21/2021 5 30
4 Building Construction Building Construction 5/22/2021 6/22/2021 5 22 5 Paving Paving 6/23/2021 7/20/2021 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/21/2021 8/17/2021 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.9844 0.0000 0.9844 0.1490 0.0000 0.1490 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 0.9844 1.5513 2.5357 0.1490 1.4411 1.5901 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 91.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 338.00 132.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0337 1.1510 0.1569 3.6300e0030.0797 3.8300e0030.0835 0.0218 3.6600e0030.0255 380.8229 380.8229 0.0310 381.5976 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0680 0.0341 0.4385 1.2200e0030.1232 7.5000e0040.1240 0.0327 6.9000e0040.0334 121.1716 121.1716 3.0200e003121.2472 Total 0.1017 1.1850 0.5954 4.8500e0030.2029 4.5800e0030.2075 0.0545 4.3500e0030.0589 501.9945 501.9945 0.0340 502.8448 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.9844 0.0000 0.9844 0.1490 0.0000 0.1490 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 0.9844 1.5513 2.5357 0.1490 1.4411 1.5901 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0816 0.0409 0.5263 1.4600e0030.1479 9.0000e0040.1488 0.0392 8.2000e0040.0401 145.4060 145.4060 3.6300e003145.4967 Total 0.0816 0.0409 0.5263 1.4600e0030.1479 9.0000e0040.1488 0.0392 8.2000e0040.0401 145.4060 145.4060 3.6300e003145.4967 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0907 0.0454 0.5847 1.6200e0030.1643 1.0000e0030.1653 0.0436 9.2000e0040.0445 161.5622 161.5622 4.0300e003161.6630 Total 0.0907 0.0454 0.5847 1.6200e0030.1643 1.0000e0030.1653 0.0436 9.2000e0040.0445 161.5622 161.5622 4.0300e003161.6630 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3916 14.6863 2.0850 0.0376 0.8944 0.0392 0.9337 0.2575 0.0375 0.2951 3,938.932 2 3,938.932
2 0.4437 3,950.024
6 Worker 1.5326 0.7674 9.8818 0.0274 2.7766 0.0168 2.7934 0.7365 0.0155 0.7520 2,730.400 9 2,730.400
9 0.0681 2,732.104
2 Total 1.9242 15.4536 11.9669 0.0650 3.6710 0.0561 3.7271 0.9940 0.0530 1.0470 6,669.333 1 6,669.333
1 0.5118 6,682.128
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.6 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 9 2,207.210
9 0.7139 2,225.057
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 9 2,207.210
9 0.7139 2,225.057
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.6 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0680 0.0341 0.4385 1.2200e0030.1232 7.5000e0040.1240 0.0327 6.9000e0040.0334 121.1716 121.1716 3.0200e003121.2472 Total 0.0680 0.0341 0.4385 1.2200e0030.1232 7.5000e0040.1240 0.0327 6.9000e0040.0334 121.1716 121.1716 3.0200e003121.2472 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 9 2,207.210
9 0.7139 2,225.057
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 9 2,207.210
9 0.7139 2,225.057
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.3083 0.1544 1.9881 5.5200e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 549.3114 549.3114 0.0137 549.6541 Total 0.3083 0.1544 1.9881 5.5200e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 549.3114 549.3114 0.0137 549.6541 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.3083 0.1544 1.9881 5.5200e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 549.3114 549.3114 0.0137 549.6541 Total 0.3083 0.1544 1.9881 5.5200e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 549.3114 549.3114 0.0137 549.6541 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information

5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.487139 0.031901 0.169199 0.121386 0.017033 0.004732 0.033028 0.124746 0.002366 0.001590 0.005154 0.001097 0.000629 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Unmitigated 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.6000e0045.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Total 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.6000e0045.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Total 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

11.0 Vegetation

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on project size and details.

Off-road Equipment -
Demolition - Assumes 20,000 building sf for demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Project assumed not to generate net new trips, but instead would redistribute existing trips (see Traffic Study - Kittelson & Associates).

Energy Use - Lighting

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 48.50 Acre 48.50 2,112,660.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Operational Year 2021
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Fresno Sports and Park Complex
Fresno County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 55.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 740.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 50.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 75.00 30.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 55.00 20.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 10.00
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 0.00 0.02
tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4.17 1.59
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 346.00 132.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 887.00 338.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 177.00 68.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 22.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 16.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 0.00
tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 57,786,845.46 22,042,404.97 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2754 46.4532 31.3745 0.0874 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 8,761.949 2 8,761.949
2 1.9464 0.0000 8,791.439
8 Maximum 4.2754 46.4532 31.3745 0.0874 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 8,761.949 2 8,761.949
2 1.9464 0.0000 8,791.439
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2754 46.4532 31.3745 0.0874 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 8,761.949 2 8,761.949
2 1.9464 0.0000 8,791.439
8 Maximum 4.2754 46.4532 31.3745 0.0874 18.2141 2.0454 20.2595 9.9699 1.8817 11.8516 0.0000 8,761.949 2 8,761.949
2 1.9464 0.0000 8,791.439
8 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 91.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 338.00 132.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 68.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0348 1.1809 0.1773 3.5500e0030.0797 3.9000e0030.0836 0.0218 3.7400e0030.0256 372.6168 372.6168 0.0350 373.4923 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0632 0.0400 0.3720 1.0700e0030.1232 7.5000e0040.1240 0.0327 6.9000e0040.0334 106.1985 106.1985 2.6600e003106.2650 Total 0.0980 1.2209 0.5494 4.6200e0030.2029 4.6500e0030.2075 0.0545 4.4300e0030.0590 478.8153 478.8153 0.0377 479.7573 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.9844 0.0000 0.9844 0.1490 0.0000 0.1490 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 0.9844 1.5513 2.5357 0.1490 1.4411 1.5901 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0758 0.0480 0.4465 1.2800e0030.1479 9.0000e0040.1488 0.0392 8.2000e0040.0401 127.4382 127.4382 3.1900e003127.5179 Total 0.0758 0.0480 0.4465 1.2800e0030.1479 9.0000e0040.1488 0.0392 8.2000e0040.0401 127.4382 127.4382 3.1900e003127.5179 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0842 0.0534 0.4961 1.4200e0030.1643 1.0000e0030.1653 0.0436 9.2000e0040.0445 141.5980 141.5980 3.5500e003141.6866 Total 0.0842 0.0534 0.4961 1.4200e0030.1643 1.0000e0030.1653 0.0436 9.2000e0040.0445 141.5980 141.5980 3.5500e003141.6866 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4119 14.8105 2.5044 0.0364 0.8944 0.0408 0.9352 0.2575 0.0390 0.2966 3,815.579 5 3,815.579
5 0.5037 3,828.172
0 Worker 1.4229 0.9016 8.3834 0.0240 2.7766 0.0168 2.7934 0.7365 0.0155 0.7520 2,393.005 8 2,393.005
8 0.0599 2,394.503
6 Total 1.8348 15.7121 10.8878 0.0604 3.6710 0.0576 3.7286 0.9940 0.0545 1.0485 6,208.585 3 6,208.585
3 0.5636 6,222.675
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363
9 0.6160 2,568.764
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.6 Paving - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0632 0.0400 0.3720 1.0700e0030.1232 7.5000e0040.1240 0.0327 6.9000e0040.0334 106.1985 106.1985 2.6600e003106.2650 Total 0.0632 0.0400 0.3720 1.0700e0030.1232 7.5000e0040.1240 0.0327 6.9000e0040.0334 106.1985 106.1985 2.6600e003106.2650 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 9 2,207.210
9 0.7139 2,225.057
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 9 2,207.210
9 0.7139 2,225.057
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2863 0.1814 1.6866 4.8300e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 481.4331 481.4331 0.0121 481.7345 Total 0.2863 0.1814 1.6866 4.8300e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 481.4331 481.4331 0.0121 481.7345 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e0030.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2863 0.1814 1.6866 4.8300e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 481.4331 481.4331 0.0121 481.7345 Total 0.2863 0.1814 1.6866 4.8300e0030.5586 3.3800e0030.5620 0.1482 3.1200e0030.1513 481.4331 481.4331 0.0121 481.7345 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.2 Trip Summary Information

5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.487139 0.031901 0.169199 0.121386 0.017033 0.004732 0.033028 0.124746 0.002366 0.001590 0.005154 0.001097 0.000629 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.6000e0045.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Total 0.1093 5.0000e0054.9700e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0106 0.0106 3.0000e0050.0113 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

11.0 Vegetation

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 24 Date: 1/14/2021 8:35 AM Fresno Sports and Park Complex - Fresno County, Winter
EMFAC2017 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: County
Region: FRESNO
Calendar Year: 2021
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption. Note 'day' in the unit is operation day.

Region Calendar Year Vehicle Category Model Year Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips Fuel Consumption MPG FRESNO 2021 All Other Buses Aggregated Aggregated DSL 163.3759123 9551.723599 1372.357664 1.066679031 8.954637078 FRESNO 2021 LDA Aggregated Aggregated GAS 360187.0142 13826269.44 1691918.992 450.5829573 30.68529162 FRESNO 2021 LDA Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2734.668836 113419.567 13041.16806 2.240176367 50.62974894 FRESNO 2021 LDA Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 5771.621263 228949.6144 28804.39941 0 FRESNO 2021 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 39099.95365 1354856.639 175754.8755 52.1252267 25.99234046 FRESNO 2021 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 29.87393939 419.4733253 93.9839647 0.01653543 25.36815417 FRESNO 2021 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 129.7655311 5482.677129 660.2390481 0 FRESNO 2021 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 129640.0253 4712300.458 596970.0264 198.0045045 23.79895583 FRESNO 2021 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 548.3314518 23832.76525 2687.423482 0.640468806 37.211438 FRESNO 2021 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 713.4992138 23801.29738 3620.137061 0 FRESNO 2021 LHD1 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 10624.69394 355805.1831 158292.1089 42.963626 8.28154456 FRESNO 2021 LHD1 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 10656.82718 371708.625 134049.4796 21.02038574 17.68324471 FRESNO 2021 LHD2 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 1825.478029 59952.66741 27196.90267 8.323817429 7.202544737 FRESNO 2021 LHD2 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 3628.561563 128355.2011 45642.73974 8.141716014 15.76512874 FRESNO 2021 MCY Aggregated Aggregated GAS 18423.29031 148923.4391 36846.58062 3.935963267 37.83659271 FRESNO 2021 MDV Aggregated Aggregated GAS 124848.6639 4140987.568 564003.9311 215.1808357 19.24422105 FRESNO 2021 MDV Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2105.941898 86518.70538 10153.68686 3.196155058 27.06962078 FRESNO 2021 MDV Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 312.4966737 10759.61149 1601.534031 0 FRESNO 2021 MH Aggregated Aggregated GAS 1759.975585 15220.55632 176.0679576 3.213623157 4.73626047 FRESNO 2021 MH Aggregated Aggregated DSL 722.7873095 6309.523058 72.27873095 0.651750843 9.680882086 FRESNO 2021 Motor Coach Aggregated Aggregated DSL 59.76869668 7770.733598 872.6229715 1.242306715 6.255084597 FRESNO 2021 OBUS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 343.9261828 17738.4867 6881.275066 3.81183852 4.653525224 FRESNO 2021 PTO Aggregated Aggregated DSL 0 14761.34913 0 3.009193327 4.90541734 FRESNO 2021 SBUS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 86.90521149 4894.756624 347.6208459 0.534550326 9.156774189 FRESNO 2021 SBUS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1106.638049 34721.91042 12770.44966 4.371790876 7.94226243 MHD FRESNO 2021 T6 Ag Aggregated Aggregated DSL 70.58470331 986.5981425 310.5726946 0.109064383 9.046015876 8.984019 FRESNO 2021 T6 CAIRP heavy Aggregated Aggregated DSL 149.4455623 29407.45814 2181.90521 2.667127291 11.02589225 FRESNO 2021 T6 CAIRP small Aggregated Aggregated DSL 78.24582375 4095.853786 1142.389027 0.394920925 10.37132633 FRESNO 2021 T6 instate construction heavyAggregated Aggregated DSL 517.3970346 35207.97972 2339.131877 4.381177142 8.036191777 FRESNO 2021 T6 instate construction small Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2198.030381 113731.8796 9937.209892 14.05918199 8.089509022 FRESNO 2021 T6 instate heavy Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1868.81872 241522.0626 21565.90893 24.86084134 9.714959331 FRESNO 2021 T6 instate small Aggregated Aggregated DSL 4091.470089 205725.3141 47214.99757 21.86108511 9.410571938 FRESNO 2021 T6 OOS heavy Aggregated Aggregated DSL 84.99599301 16840.98131 1240.941498 1.526099078 11.03531321 FRESNO 2021 T6 OOS small Aggregated Aggregated DSL 45.86234765 2383.189166 669.5902756 0.229891569 10.36657925 FRESNO 2021 T6 Public Aggregated Aggregated DSL 521.5352965 7851.259054 1581.990398 1.125424582 6.97626405 FRESNO 2021 T6 utility Aggregated Aggregated DSL 110.1189523 1853.1229 1266.367952 0.205809786 9.004056297 FRESNO 2021 T6TS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 926.1474538 51879.6628 18530.35826 10.96463468 4.731545038 HHD FRESNO 2021 T7 Ag Aggregated Aggregated DSL 54.1137815 830.8241065 238.1006386 0.145510213 5.709730546 5.379501 FRESNO 2021 T7 CAIRP Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2654.271667 471356.3512 38752.36633 70.76853275 6.660535874 FRESNO 2021 T7 CAIRP construction Aggregated Aggregated DSL 139.9590605 25290.19768 632.7494708 4.396813342 5.751937985 FRESNO 2021 T7 NNOOS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2864.474226 574611.4909 41821.3237 83.04795011 6.919032802 FRESNO 2021 T7 NOOS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1042.19486 185193.7786 15216.04496 28.45751002 6.507729541 FRESNO 2021 T7 other port Aggregated Aggregated DSL 53.96604641 8643.165324 410.1419527 1.580636182 5.468156064 FRESNO 2021 T7 POAK Aggregated Aggregated DSL 284.8967002 32755.92016 2165.214922 6.263997875 5.229235516 FRESNO 2021 T7 POLA Aggregated Aggregated DSL 266.0142577 33509.94953 2021.708358 6.437710689 5.205258694 FRESNO 2021 T7 Public Aggregated Aggregated DSL 770.5682866 15575.68186 2337.390467 2.845323791 5.474133353 FRESNO 2021 T7 Single Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1037.685109 74341.10476 11974.74229 12.02959418 6.179851428 FRESNO 2021 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated DSL 892.2981086 62740.3288 4034.045056 11.80656174 5.314022 FRESNO 2021 T7 SWCV Aggregated Aggregated DSL 431.0296171 17588.1497 1681.015507 7.245638552 2.427411963 FRESNO 2021 T7 SWCV Aggregated Aggregated NG 63.8381311 2604.304657 248.9687113 1.140120734 2.284235853 FRESNO 2021 T7 tractor Aggregated Aggregated DSL 5014.592123 685159.73 63685.31996 95.1828025 7.198356341 FRESNO 2021 T7 tractor construction Aggregated Aggregated DSL 745.1217937 51755.24755 3368.666659 9.809894294 5.275821126 FRESNO 2021 T7 utility Aggregated Aggregated DSL 35.58888675 722.0536174 409.2721977 0.12285306 5.877375944 FRESNO 2021 T7IS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 3.57827957 472.6745653 71.59421764 0.119101015 3.968686299 FRESNO 2021 UBUS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 78.45019703 6763.939254 313.8007881 1.515811011 4.462257633 FRESNO 2021 UBUS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 20.05814875 2067.837991 80.23259498 0.269484577 7.673307371 FRESNO 2021 UBUS Aggregated Aggregated NG 119.5188953 13413.33 478.075581 3.087400739 4.344538054 Off-road (i.e. On-site) Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage Note: For the sake of simplicity, and as a conservative estimation, it was assumed that all off-road vehicles use diesel fuel as an energy source.

Demolition, Site preparation, and Grading off-road mobile vehicle on-site gallons of fuel are calculated below.

Given Factor: 133.5 metric tons CO2 (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Conversion Factor: 2204.6262 pounds per metric ton
Intermediate Result: 294,309 pounds CO2
Conversion Factor: 22.38 pounds CO2 per 1 gallon of diesel fuel Source: U.S. EIA, 2016 Final Result: 13,150.56 gallons diesel fuel http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=307&t=11 Unmitigated Onsite Scenario Total CO2 (MT/yr) (provided in CalEEMod Output File) Demolition 34.2400
Site Preparation 16.8530
Grading 82.4033
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Demolition Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output) Total Daily Hual Trips (CalEEMod Output) 15 91
Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output) Haul Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 7.3
Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT: Average Haul Daily VMT:
162 664
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers
LDA LDT1 LDT2 Fleet Mix for Workers (CalEEMod Output)

0.51 0.03 0.17 MHD HHD
(% mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) 50% 50% And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2017) - Year 2021 LDA LDT1 LDT2

30.69 25.99 23.80
Diesel:

Therefore: MHD HHD
Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor 8.98 5.38

20.48 Step 3: Therefore: Weighted Average Hauler (Diesel) MPG Factor 8 Worker daily gallons of gasoline 7.18
Step 4: 20 # of Days (CalEEMod Output) Therefore:
92 Hauler daily gallons of diesel
Therefore:

Result: 158 Total gallons of gasoline
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Site Preparation Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
18 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
194
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers
LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.51 0.03 0.17
(% mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2017) - Year 2021 LDA LDT1 LDT2

30.69 25.99 23.80
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

20.48 Step 3: Therefore:
9 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 10 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 95 Total gallons of gasoline
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Grading
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
20 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
216
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers
LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.51 0.03 0.17
(Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2017) - Year 2021 LDA LDT1 LDT2

30.69 25.99 23.80
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

20.48 Step 3: Therefore:
11 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 30 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 316 Total gallons of gasoline
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Building Construction Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output) Total Daily Vendor Trips (CalEEMod Output) 338 132
Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output) Vendor Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 7.3
Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT: Average Vendor Daily VMT:
3,650 964
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers (Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 18) LDA LDT1 LDT2 Fleet Mix for Workers (CalEEMod Output)

0.51 0.03 0.17 MHD HHD
Assumed Fleet Mix for Vendors 50% 50%
And:

MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2017) - Year 2021 Gasoline: Diesel:

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MHD HHD

30.69 25.99 23.80 8.98 5.38
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker (Gasoline) MPG Factor Weighted Average Vendor (Diesel) MPG Factor

20.48 7.18
Step 3: Therefore: Therefore:
178 Worker daily gallons of gasoline 134 Vendor daily gallons of diesel Step 4: 22 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore: Therefore:
3,922 Total gallons of gasoline 2,952 Total gallons of diesel On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Paving
Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
15 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
162
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers
LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.51 0.03 0.17
(Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (from EMFAC2017) - Year 2021 LDA LDT1 LDT2

30.69 25.99 23.80
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

20.5 Step 3: Therefore:
8 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 20 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 158 Total gallons of gasoline
On-road Mobile (Construction) Energy Usage - Architectural Coating Step 1: Total Daily Worker Trips (CalEEMod Output)
68 Worker Trip Length (miles) (CalEEMod Output)

10.8 Therefore:

Average Worker Daily VMT:
734
Step 2: Given:

Assumed Fleet Mix for Workers
LDA LDT1 LDT2

0.51 0.03 0.17
(Percentage mix is provided on Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMOD p. 15) And:

Gasoline MPG Factors for each Vehicle Class (EMFAC2017 Output) - Year 2021 LDA LDT1 LDT2

30.69 25.99 23.80
Therefore:

Weighted Average Worker MPG Factor

20.5 Step 3: Therefore:
36 Worker daily gallons of gasoline
Step 4: 20 # of Days (CalEEMod Output)
Therefore:

Result: 717 Total gallons of gasoline
Appendix B
Cultural Resource Assessment
(Confidential)
Appendix C
Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK
2155 South Peach Avenue
Fresno, California
WKA No. 12987.01
January 27, 2021
Revised: February 17, 2021
Prepared for:

Mr. Steve McMurtry
De Novo Planning Group
1020 Suncast Lane, #106
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK
2155 South Peach Avenue
Fresno, California
WKA No. 12987.01
January 27, 2021
Revised: February 17, 2021
Wallace-Kuhl & Associates (WKA), on behalf of De Novo Planning Group, prepared this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Southeast Fresno Regional Park located at 2155 South Peach Avenue in Fresno, California. We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, the report preparer and reviewer meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in general conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312 et seq. Resumes of the key staff who prepared this report are included in Appendix A.

WALLACE-KUHL & ASSOCIATES
________________________ _______________________
Nancy M. Malaret Kurt Balasek, P.G., C.HG.

Project Environmental Scientist Senior Hydrogeologist
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK
WKA No. 12987.01

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................i

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................1

1.1 Purpose......................................................................................................................1

1.2 Scope of Services ......................................................................................................1

1.3 Special Terms and Conditions....................................................................................2

1.4 User Provided Information..........................................................................................3

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................4

2.1 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics....................................................................4

2.2 Site Reconnaissance..................................................................................................4

2.2.1 Municipal Infrastructure and Utilities.....................................................................5

2.3 Adjoining Properties ...................................................................................................5

3.0 INTERVIEWS .................................................................................................................6

3.1 Owner or Key Site Manager .......................................................................................6

3.2 Occupants (Multi-family or Major)...............................................................................6

3.3 Past Owners, Operators, and/or Occupants ...............................................................7

3.4 State and/or Local Government Officials ....................................................................7

3.5 Abandoned Properties................................................................................................7

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW.......................................................................................................8

4.1 Physical Setting Source(s) .........................................................................................8

4.1.1 Regional and Local Geology ................................................................................8

4.1.2 Radon Gas...........................................................................................................9

4.1.3 Soil Survey...........................................................................................................9

4.1.4 Regional and Local Groundwater.........................................................................9

4.2 Historical Use Information ..........................................................................................10

4.2.1 Sanborn® Maps...................................................................................................10

4.2.2 Topographic Maps ...............................................................................................10

4.2.3 Oil and Gas Well Maps ........................................................................................11

4.2.4 Aerial Photographs...............................................................................................12

4.2.5 Ownership Records..............................................................................................15

4.2.6 Building Department Records ..............................................................................15

4.2.7 Local Street Directories........................................................................................16

4.2.8 Zoning and Land Use Records.............................................................................16

4.2.9 Other Historical Sources ......................................................................................16

4.2.10 Prior Assessments ...............................................................................................17 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK
WKA No. 12987.01
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

4.3 Environmental Record Sources..................................................................................17

4.3.1 Regulatory Agency Databases.............................................................................17

4.3.2 Preliminary Screen for Vapor Encroachment Conditions......................................21

4.3.3 Environmental Lien Search ..................................................................................21

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................22

5.1 Data Gaps..................................................................................................................22

5.2 Conclusions................................................................................................................22

5.3 Recommendations .....................................................................................................24

5.4 Exceptions and/or Deletions.......................................................................................25

5.5 Additional Services.....................................................................................................25

6.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................26

7.0 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................27

FIGURES
1 Vicinity Map
2 Topographic Map
3 Parcel Map
4 Aerial Site Map
5a-5e Color Photographs

APPENDICES
A Resumes
B ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire and Helpful Documents Checklist C Supporting Documents*
C EDR® Radius Map Report with GeoCheck
D Preliminary Screen for Vapor Encroachment Conditions Matrix *Supporting Documents Appendix contains: Custom Soil Resource Report, EDR® Reports:

Sanborn Map Search, Historical Topographic Maps, Aerial Photographic Decade Package, and City Directory Report; Building Permits, FEMA Flood Map, and Environmental Lien Search Report.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK
WKA No. 12987.01

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to assess the Southeast Fresno Regional Park (herein referred to as Site) for evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) resulting from current and/or former Site activities. The Site is located at 2155 South Peach Avenue in Fresno, California (Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4) and is comprised of 47.21 acres of land. The Site is identified by three Fresno County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 473-030-07T and 481-020-29T and -30T (Figure 3). An off-site railroad track transects the Site from east to west dividing it into two areas. Fresno County APN 473-030-07T is located to the north of the railroad tracks. Fresno County APNs 481-020-29T and -30T are located to the south of the railroad tracks. For the purposes of this report, Fresno County APN 473-030- 07T will be referred to as Area A and Fresno County APNs 481-020-29T and -30T will be referred to as Area B. Area A is currently developed with the frame of a structure and a community garden. Area B was observed to have several concrete pads that were fenced off and two irrigation wells. The following presents a list of observations and findings identified during the preparation of this report:
• The historical land use research dating back to the early 1900s revealed that Area A was developed with structures and vineyards by 1937. Sixteen structures were present on the western portion from at least 1937 to 2020; however, eight of the structures were constructed after 1983. The areas outside of the structures were planted with vineyards from at least 1937 to at least 1998. A community garden has been present on the southern portion since at least 2012. All structures were removed from Area A by late 2020.
• Area A was occupied by the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Station (USDA ARS) from at least 1937 to 1992. • Between 1989 and 1995, seven underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed from Area A. The UTSs were located adjacent to structures. Petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils were left in-place beneath two structures. See Section 4.3.1 for additional information.
• The historical land use research dating back to the early 1900s revealed that Area B was developed with structures, vineyards, orchards, and ponds by 1937. At least 15 structures were located on the western and west-central portions of Area B from at least 1937 to at least 1979. Two structures were located on the southwestern portion from at least 1957 to at least 1973. All structures were removed from Area B by 1984. Areas Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page ii
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
outside of the structures were planted with vineyards and orchards or developed with ponds between 1937 and 1979.
• City directory reports indicated that Henrietta Fruit juices and concentrates operated at 2155 South Peach Avenue from at least 1962 to at least 1980. 2155 South Peach Avenue is associated with one of the APNs in Area B. Building department records indicate that permits were issued to Henrietta Rancho Products between 1960 and 1981. The permits issued in 1981 were for the demolition of structures. • The City of Fresno provided a Grant Deed, dated September 25, 1952, to WKA.

4.3.1 for additional information.
• According to an environmental lien search, no environmental liens are associated with the Site. However, an activity use limitation (AUL) has been recorded on the deed that requires that the Site be used for public purposes.
• Building maintenance activities may have included the application of persistent pesticides (termiticides) around the foundation of the former structures to prevent pest invasions, such as termites.
• Given the age of the historical development of the Site, it is likely that lead-based paints were used in the construction and/or maintenance of the former Site buildings. • Given the documentation reviewed concerning the agency listings for neighboring facilities, none of the facilities reviewed is likely to have a negative impact on the Site.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page iii
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
• Based on the completion of the vapor encroachment condition (VEC) screening matrix, WKA concludes a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC does not or is not likely to exist.

WKA has performed this ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 for the Southeast Fresno Regional Park.

This assessment has revealed no RECs in connection with the Site except the following:
• On-site concerns were noted from the mixing of agricultural chemicals adjacent to irrigation wells as reported by a USDA staff member in 1985. • On-site concerns were noted from the historical agriculture activities including the raising of vineyards and orchards and the potential for residues of historically applied persistent pesticides.
• On-site concerns were noted from the historical presence of structures on Area A from at least 1937 to 2020 and on Area B from at least 1937 to at least 1979 and the potential for residues of historically applied persistent pesticides (termiticides) and lead from leadbased paint to be present in surface soils in the vicinity of the structures. The concerns are noted from structures that were constructed before 1975 for lead and before 1988 for persistent pesticides.
• On-site concerns were noted regarding the petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils that were left in-place beneath two structures in Area A after the removal of USTs.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK
WKA No. 12987.01

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to evaluate the Southeast Fresno Regional Park (herein referred to as Site) for evidence of potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) resulting from current and/or former site activities as defined by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-13 (ASTM, 2013).

According to the ASTM, “this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations under CERCLA [Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act] liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B).”
This ESA has been performed in general conformance with the ASTM Standard E 1527-13 and the scope and limitations defined in Wallace-Kuhl & Associates (WKA) proposal, 3PR20110, dated July 17, 2020.

1.2 Scope of Services
WKA has completed this ESA for the Site shown on Figures 1 through 4. Mr. Steve McMurtry with De Novo Planning Group authorized WKA to proceed with this assessment via email correspondence on November 24, 2020.

The scope of this assessment included the following:
• Conduct a site reconnaissance for visual evidence of surface contamination and potential sources of subsurface contamination;
• Conduct a visual inspection of the adjoining properties for evidence of RECs; • Conduct interviews with the following, as available:
 Key site manager,
 Major occupants,
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 2
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
 Past and present owners, operators,
 Government and/or agency personnel, and,
 Inquiries conducted at abandoned sites may include interviews with owners or occupants of neighboring or nearby properties;
• Conduct a records review, which included the following:
 Physical setting documents to determine regional geology, general soil information, and local and regional groundwater conditions,
 Historical information, including but not limited to, Sanborn maps, topographic maps, aerial photographs, ownership records, building department records, local street directories, zoning and land use records, and prior assessments, as available,
 Environmental records, including federal, state, tribal, and county regulatory agency lists that will help identify RECs on the Site and the adjoining properties, and,
 Based on the outcome of the database search, review of specific regulatory agency files for identified contaminated facilities in order to evaluate whether the listed facilities are hazardous materials threats to the Site; • Conduct a preliminary screen for vapor encroachment conditions on the Site per ASTM E2600-15;
• Review of the completed ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire (Questionnaire) regarding Recorded Environmental Liens, activity and use limitations (AULs), relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the Site, and any specialized knowledge of the Site;
• Review of environmental liens and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) reports, as provided; and
• Prepare a final report of the results of the ESA.

1.3 Special Terms and Conditions
No special terms or conditions to the WKA Environmental Site Assessment Consulting Agreement or the WKA scope of services were requested or performed during the preparation of this report. De Novo Planning Group authorized WKA to perform a search for recorded environmental liens and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) for the Site. Discussion regarding the search is included in Section 4.3.3 of this report.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 3
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

1.4 User Provided Information
WKA provided De Novo Planning Group a copy of the User Questionnaire and the Helpful Documents checklist. Mr. Josh Smith, De Novo Planning Group, completed and returned the documents to WKA. Discussion regarding his responses is provided in the following section. A copy of the completed questionnaire is included in Appendix B.

In summary, Mr. Smith was not aware of any records of environmental liens or AULs currently recorded against the Site. Mr. Smith stated he does not possess specialized knowledge or experience related to the Site. Mr. Smith stated that he is not aware of any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the Site.

Mr. Smith was not aware of existing “Helpful Documents” as defined in Section 10.8.1 of the ASTM Standard as noted on the “Helpful Documents Checklist” included in Appendix B.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 4
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics
The Site is located at 2155 South Peach Avenue in Fresno, California (Figures 1 and 2). The Site is comprised of three Fresno County Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 473-030-07T and 481-020-29T and -30T, totaling 47.21 acres of land. For the purposes of this report, the three parcels have been separated into two areas, Area A and Area B. Area A consists of Fresno County APN 473-030-07T. Area B consists of Fresno County APNs 481-020-29T and -30T.

Area A was developed with the frame of a structure and a community garden. Area B was observed to have several concrete pads that were fenced off and two irrigation wells (Figure 3).

Railroad tracks transect the Site parcels from east to west between Areas A and B. Surrounding land use consisted of residential subdivisions (Figure 4).

Area A was developed with 16 structures between 1937 and 2020. Eight of the structures were developed after 1984. Area B was developed with 15 structures on the west-central portion from at least 1937 to 1981. Two structures were located on the southwestern portion of Area B from at least 1950 to at least 1973. Given the age of the historical development on the Site, it is likely that lead-based paints were used in the construction and/or maintenance of the former Site buildings that were constructed before 1975. Building maintenance activities may have included the application of persistent pesticides (termiticides) around the foundation of the former structures that were present before 1984 to prevent pest invasions, such as termites.

2.2 Site Reconnaissance
A visual site reconnaissance was conducted by WKA on December 9, 2020. Figure 5 provides color photographs of the Site taken during the site reconnaissance.

On the day of site reconnaissance, Area A was primarily vacant land. WKA observed one concrete pad and wood frame that is a remnant of a structure on the northwestern portion.

WKA observed several depressions on the northwestern portion that were the former locations of structures. WKA observed remnants of an irrigation well on the northern portion of Area A. A pit is present on the western portion, which is the location of a sewer stub. A pile of soil was located adjacent to the pit. WKA observed recently planted trees and associated irrigation on the northern and eastern portions. A community garden is located on the southern portion of the Site. A storage shed was located to the west of the community garden. The shed’s door was welded shut and a City of Fresno representative stated that it was empty. WKA observed nuisance dumping outside of the shed. WKA observed remnant concrete and asphalt surfaces and a shallow basin on the southeastern portion of Area A.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 5
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Area B was vacant land. The majority of Area B was bare soil that had recently been disced.

WKA observed three fenced areas within Area B. The largest fenced area is located on the western portion. WKA observed a small concrete pad and bollards within the fenced area. A second smaller fenced area is located to the south of the large fenced area. An irrigation well is located within the fenced area. The third fenced area is located approximately 350 feet east of the two previously noted fenced areas. WKA observed a second irrigation well within the fenced area. A pile of concrete rubble and metal debris was observed adjacent to the east of the third fenced area. A concrete pad was located to the southeast of the third fenced area.

2.2.1 Municipal Infrastructure and Utilities
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) provides electricity and natural gas to the Site vicinity. The City of Fresno provides potable water and sanitary sewer service to the Site vicinity. One polemounted transformer was observed in the right-of-way between Area A and South Peach Avenue. One pole-mounted transformer was observed within Area B.

2.3 Adjoining Properties
The Site is bounded to the north, east, and south by residences. South Peach Avenue is located to the west of the Site. Vacant land is located beyond South Peach Avenue to the west and southwest of Area B. A residential subdivision is located beyond South Peach Avenue to the west and northwest of Area A.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 6
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

3.0 INTERVIEWS
Interviews with various persons familiar with the site vicinity, including representatives of public agencies, were conducted for the purpose of identifying past and present uses, which may have contributed to RECs on the Site. Results of those interviews are discussed in the following sections.

3.1 Owner or Key Site Manager
WKA provided Ms. Summer Cecil, City of Fresno, with a questionnaire regarding the Site. The questionnaire was completed by City of Fresno staff and returned to WKA by Ms. Cecil.

According to information provided on the questionnaire, the City of Fresno Parks and Recreation received the Site approximately 14 years ago from the United States Federal Government. The Site had been occupied by the United States Department of Agricultural Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory and was declared surplus property in October 2004.

The City of Fresno indicated that a 2015 report indicated 29 structures were present on the northern portion of the Site; however, WKA believes that there is a typo on the questionnaire. (A copy of the 2015 report, Field Inspection and Evaluation for USDA Horticultural Field Station, dated February 3, 2015, has been provided in Appendix C.) The Site is currently vacant land with a community garden on Area A. The City of Fresno staff members are not aware of any soil that has been imported to the Site. The City of Fresno noted that a 2015 report indicated that a basin was located on the southwestern portion of Area A. The City of Fresno staff reported that two fuel tanks and a cement tank with unknown use were noted on a diagram included in the 2015 report. According to The City of Fresno staff, structures that were present on Area A burned down as a result of a fire started by trespassers in mid-2020. The structures in Area A were demolished after the fire. The City of Fresno staff are not aware of any environmental liens that have been recorded for the Site.

The City of Fresno provided building permit documents, which are summarized in Section 4.2.6.

The City of Fresno also provided several Cultural Resource documents for the Site; however, the documents did not provide information regarding the historical use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials or petroleum products.

3.2 Occupants (Multi-family or Major)
The only active use at the Site is the community garden. Information regarding the community garden was provided by Mr. Ricardo Rodriguez, City of Fresno Parks, After School, Recreation, and Community Services (PARCS) department. The community garden is managed by Fresno Metro Ministry. He stated that the community garden uses City of Fresno municipal water for irrigation. According to Mr. Rodriguez, the garden is organic, and gardeners only utilize natural products for herbicides and pesticides.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 7
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

3.3 Past Owners, Operators, and/or Occupants
The Site was previously owned and occupied by the United States Department of Agricultural (USDA) Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory. WKA did not interview a representative from the USDA; however, a document discussing the history of the facility that occupied Area A was located on the USDA website and is summarized in Section 4.2.9. A copy of the history is provided in Appendix C.

3.4 State and/or Local Government Officials
The Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health publishes their records on an Environmental Health Document Portal. Information reviewed on the Environmental Health Document Portal website is provided in Section 4.3.

The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) publishes their records on their GeoTracker website. When records are unavailable on GeoTracker, WKA makes direct contact to request unpublished documents from the SWRCB. WKA reviewed information for facilities within the vicinity of the Site on the GeoTracker website and a summary is provided in Section

4.3. The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) publishes their records on their EnviroStor website. When records are unavailable on EnviroStor, WKA makes direct contact to request unpublished documents from the DTSC. WKA reviewed information for facilities within the vicinity of the Site on the DTSC EnviroStor website and a summary is provided in Section

4.3. 3.5 Abandoned Properties
As referenced in 40 CFR Part 312, in the case of inquiries conducted at “abandoned properties,” as defined in §312.23(d), “where there is evidence of potential unauthorized uses of the Site or evidence of uncontrolled access to the Site, the environmental professional’s inquiry must include interviewing one or more (as necessary) owners or occupants of neighboring or nearby properties from which it appears possible to have observed uses of, or releases at, such abandoned properties…” No evidence of potential unauthorized uses, or evidence of uncontrolled access to the Site was observed. The Site is not considered an abandoned property and therefore, WKA did not interview owners or occupants of neighboring properties.

The City of Fresno Staff indicated that trespassing has occurred at the Site, including an instanced that resulted in a structure fire in mid-2020. Staff from The City of Fresno were not aware of hazardous materials or petroleum products having been dumped at the Site.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 8
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

4.0 RECORDS REVIEW
The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review information concerning the current and historical use of the Site and adjoining properties that would help identify the presence of RECs in connection with the Site. The records review included review and discussion of the following, as available:
• Physical Setting Source(s);
• Historical Use Information; and,
• Environmental Record Sources.

4.1 Physical Setting Source(s)
The Site is depicted on the 1981 United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute topographic map of the Malaga, California Quadrangle as developed with four structures labeled as the US Department of Agriculture Horticultural Field Station on the northern portion and 16 structures labeled as the US Experimental Station on the southern portion. The Site is located within Sections 8 and 17, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, at an elevation of approximately +300 feet relative to mean sea level (msl).

4.1.1 Regional and Local Geology
The Site is located in the Great Valley geomorphic province of California, a 500-mile, northwesttrending structural trough, generally constrained to the west by the Coast Ranges and to the east by the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Range (Norris and Webb, 1990). The Great Valley consists of two valleys lying end-to-end, with the Sacramento Valley to the north and the San Joaquin Valley to the south.

The Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys have been filled to their present elevations with thick sequences of sediment derived from both marine and terrestrial sources. The sedimentary deposits range in thickness from relatively thin deposits along the eastern valley edge to more than 25,000 feet in the south-central portion of the Great Valley (Norris and Webb, 1990). The sedimentary geologic formations of the Great Valley province vary in age from Jurassic to Quaternary, with the older deposits being primarily marine in origin. Younger sediments are continentally derived and were typically deposited in lacustrine, fluvial, and alluvial environments with their primary source being the Sierra Nevada Range.

The 1965 USGS Geologic Map of California: Fresno Sheet, shows the Site to be underlain by Pleistocene nonmarine and Great Valley fan deposits.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 9
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

4.1.2 Radon Gas
Radon is a naturally occurring gas that is formed from the radioactive breakdown of radium in soil, rock, and water. Radon can move up through the ground and into living spaces through pathways and penetrations in a structure’s foundation. Radon’s potential presence in indoor air can only be assessed within existing buildings, as there are no currently available real time methods to assess Radon’s presence over undeveloped properties.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed the EPA Map of Radon Zones to assist organizations in implementing radon-resistant building codes. The map assigns each county in the United States to one of three zones based on radon potential. The EPA uses a continuous exposure level of 4.0 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L) as an action level at which additional action is recommended.

The EPA Radon Zones are defined as:
• Zone 1 (Highest Potential) – Average indoor radon screening level greater than 4 pCi/L. • Zone 2 (Moderate Potential) – Average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4 pCi/L.
• Zone 3 (Lowest Potential) – Average indoor radon screening less than 2 pCi/L.

According to information provided by Environmental Data Resources in the Radius Map Report, the Site is located in Zone 2 (EDR, 2020a).

4.1.3 Soil Survey
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has created a web-based service for accessing soil information. According to the NRCS Web Soil Survey (WSS) the majority of the near-surface soils on the Site consist of Ramona loam; Ramona loam, hard substratum; and, Hanford sandy loam (USDA, 2020). A copy of the Custom Soil Resource Report for the Site is provided in Appendix C.

4.1.4 Regional and Local Groundwater
The Site is located within the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) defined San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin of the Tulare Lake Hydrologic Region. WKA searched data on the DWR website and found no DWR monitored groundwater wells within one-half mile of the Site (DWR, 2020).

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 10
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
WKA also searched the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) GeoTracker website for quarterly groundwater monitoring reports completed for facilities in the immediate vicinity of the Site. No facilities are located within one-half mile of the Site (SWRCB, 2020).

4.2 Historical Use Information
WKA reviewed historical information to develop a history of the previous uses of the Site and surrounding area, in order to evaluate the Site and adjoining properties for evidence of RECs.

Standard historical sources reviewed during the preparation of this report included the following, as available:
• Sanborn® Maps;
• Topographic Maps;
• Oil and Gas Well Maps;
• Aerial Photographs;
• Ownership Records;
• Building Department Records;
• Local Street Directories;
• Zoning and Land Use Records;
• Other Historical Sources; and,
• Prior Assessments.

Discussion of these historical sources is provided in the following sections.

4.2.1 Sanborn® Maps
Sanborn® Maps are obtained through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR®). EDR® is a national commercial provider of environmental database information. Sanborn® Maps are detailed drawings of site development, and were typically used by fire insurance companies to determine site fire insurability. According to EDR®, Sanborn® Map coverage of the Site is not available (EDR®, 2020b). The EDR® Sanborn® Map Report is provided in Appendix C.

4.2.2 Topographic Maps
Historical USGS topographic maps with coverage of the Site and outlying land areas were reviewed. Topographic maps with coverage of the Site dated 1923, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1964, 1972, 1981, and 2012 were available for review (EDR®, 2020c). Copies of the topographic maps compiled by EDR® with coverage of the Site are included in Appendix C. Table 1 notes the changes in the vicinity of the Site.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 11
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Table 1
Year Scale Observations
1923 1:31,680
Site: One structure is depicted on the southern portion. Railroad tracks transect Areas A and B from east to west.

North: Vacant land.

East: Vacant land.

South: A structure is depicted.

West: A street followed by a structure labeled as “Experimental Farm.” 1946 1:24,000
Site: Three structures are depicted on the northern portion. Seven additional structures are depicted on the southern portion and are labeled as “US Experimental Station.”
North: Tinting indicating wooded land is depicted.

East: Vacant land followed by a trail road with four structures along it.

South: Tinting indicating wooded land is depicted.

West: Six additional structures are depicted.
1947 1:24,000 No significant changes noted for the Site or the vicinity. 1948 1:25,000 No significant changes noted for the Site or the vicinity. 1964 1:24,000
Site: One additional structure is depicted on the northern portion. Symbols indicating orchards are depicted. Eighteen structures are depicted on the southern portion.

North: Symbols indicating orchards are depicted.

East: Symbols indicating a vineyard are depicted.

South: Symbols indicating orchards are depicted.

West: Symbols indicating orchards and vineyards are depicted. 1972 1: 24,000 No significant changes noted for the Site or the vicinity. 1981 1:24,000
Site: No significant changes noted.

North: Structures and roads are depicted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: Tinting to indicate dense development and roads are depicted to the northwest.
2012 1:24,000 Individual structures are no longer depicted. New subdivision roads are depicted to the east, south, and southwest.

4.2.3 Oil and Gas Well Maps
Review of California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) website showed that the Site is not located in a designated natural gas field. No DOGGR wells are located on or within at least one mile of the Site (DOGGR, 2020).

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 12
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

4.2.4 Aerial Photographs
Historical aerial photographs of the Site and general vicinity were compiled by EDR®.

Photographs covering the years 1937, 1946, 1950, 1957, 1962, 1967, 1973, 1979, 1984, 1987, 1998, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2016 were available for review (EDR®, 2020d). Copies of the aerial photographs compiled by EDR® with coverage of the Site are included in Appendix C. Table 2 notes the changes on the property and in the vicinity.

Table 2
Year Scale Observations
November
1937 1” = 500’
Area A: At least five structures are visible on the northwestern portion.

The remainder is mostly planted with vineyards.

Area B: At least 11 structures are visible on the west-central and central portions. Two ponds are visible to the southeast of the structures. The remainder is primarily planted with vineyards and orchards.

North: Orchards are visible.

East: Vineyards are visible.

South: Vineyards and orchards are visible.

West: South Peach Avenue followed by orchards to the westnorthwest and seven structures and vacant land to the west-southwest.

April
1946 1” = 500’
Area A: Some of the fields have been replanted with the plants oriented in a different direction.

Area B: At least one new structure is visible on the central portion.

Some of the orchard trees have been removed from the southern portion. A new structure is visible on the southwestern portion.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: The previously noted vineyard has been removed.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.

January
1950 1” = 500’
Area A: No significant changes noted.

Area B: At least three new structures are visible.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 13
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Table 2
Year Scale Observations
August
1957 1” = 500’
Area A: No significant changes noted.

Area B: The previously noted ponds on the southeastern portion are no longer visible. A new structure is visible on the southwestern portion. Ground markings on the southeastern portion indicate new field subdivisions.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: A new orchard has been planted.

West: No significant changes noted.

August
1962 1” = 500’
Area A: An area has been planted with an orchard.

Area B: Vineyards have been removed from the northern portion.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.

May
1967 1” = 500’
Area A: At least three new structures are visible.

Area B: One structure has been removed.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.

May
1973 1” = 500’
Area A: No significant changes noted.

Area B: The orchards and vineyards have been removed. Ground markings on the southeastern portion indicate new field subdivisions.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: Some of the previously noted structures have been removed.

September
1979 1” = 500’
Area A: Some structures have been expanded. Two new structures are visible. A new parking lot is visible on the western portion.

Area B: The previously noted structures on the southwestern portion have been removed.

North: The existing residential subdivision is undergoing development.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: The existing residential subdivision is visible to the westnorthwest.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 14
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Table 2
Year Scale Observations
June
1984 1” = 500’
Area A: No significant changes noted.

Area B: All structures have been removed. Fallow land.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: The previously noted orchard has been removed. Fallow land.

West: Some of the structures have been removed from the westsouthwest area.

June
1987 1” = 500’
Area A: Three new structures and associated parking lots are visible on the southwestern portion.

Area B: No significant changes noted.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: The existing subdivision to the east-northeast is visible.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.
1998 1” = 500’
Area A: Five new structures are visible on the northwestern portion.

Area B: New crops are visible on the northeastern and southwestern portions.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: Additional structures have been removed from the westsouthwest. 2006 1” = 500’
Area A: Several structures have been removed from the southwestern portion. The eastern portion is fallow land.

Area B: Fallow land.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: Fallow land to east-southeast.

South: The existing residential subdivision is undergoing development.

West: All structures have been removed to the west-southwest.

Fallow land.
2009 1” = 500’
Area A: No significant changes noted.

Area B: No significant changes noted.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: The existing residential subdivision to the east-southeast is undergoing development.

South: Residences are visible.

West: No significant changes noted.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 15
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Table 2
Year Scale Observations
2012 1” = 500’
Area A: Several structures have been removed from the northwestern portion. The existing community garden is visible.

Area B: No significant changes noted.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.
2016 1” = 500’
Area A: Additional structures have been removed.

Area B: No significant changes noted.

North: No significant changes noted.

East: No significant changes noted.

South: No significant changes noted.

West: No significant changes noted.

4.2.5 Ownership Records
Ownership information was obtained through ParcelQuest®, an on-line distributor of “AssessorDirect property information throughout the State of California.” The ownership entity for the Site was listed as “Fresno City of” (ParcelQuest®, 2020).

4.2.6 Building Department Records
The City of Fresno provided Building Department records for 2021 South Peach Avenue (Area A) and 2155 South Peach Avenue (Area B).

The document for 2021 South Peach Avenue consisted of 72 pages, which were dated between 1960 and 2015. A permit that was approved on June 3, 1964, for a new septic system, which had a not that the old system had been abandoned and backfilled. A permit dated November 5, 1984, indicated that the property was to be connected to the municipal water supply and sanitary sewer. In addition, permits were issued in September 2020 for the demolition of three structures after a fire had occurred in one.

The document for 2155 South Peach Avenue consisted of 63 pages, where were dated between 1960 and 2009. Building permits issued to Henrietta Rancho Products were dated between 1960 and 1981. On a permit approved on May 4, 1970, the size of the Henrietta Rancho Products lot was reported to be 30 acres. Four demolition permits were approved in 1981 for four buildings.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 16
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
A 1952 Grant Deed was provided in the building department records for 2155 South Peach Avenue. According to the Grant Deed, dated September 25, 1952, the Henrietta Ranch Products Company acquired Area B from Mr. E. Pusey Cain. According to the Grant Deed, Mr.

Cain had acquired the property on March 20, 1934.

The building permits provided by the City of Fresno are included in Appendix C.

4.2.7 Local Street Directories
Local street directories with coverage of the Site and adjoining properties were obtained from EDR® (EDR®, 2020e). These documents contain business listings based on street number identifiers. The historical address of 2021 South Peach Avenue, for Area A, was listed as US Agricultural Market Service and US Agricultural Research Station from at least 1958 to at least 2009. Fresno County APN 481-020-30T, in Area B, was addressed as 2155 South Peach Avenue. According to the City Directories, Henrietta Rancho Products fruit juices and concentrates was listed at 2155 South Peach Avenue from at least 1962 to at least 1980. A copy of the EDR® City Directory (EDR®, 2020e) is provided in Appendix C.

4.2.8 Zoning and Land Use Records
The Site use was not listed (ParcelQuest, 2020).

The eastern portion of the Site is located in an area of minimal flood hazard and the western portion is located within a 500-year regulatory floodplain, as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The floodplain map is provided in Appendix C.

WKA reviewed data provided on the National Pipeline Mapping System website. No pipelines were identified within one-half mile of the Site (NPMS, 2020).

4.2.9 Other Historical Sources
WKA located a document regarding the history of the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Station (USDA ARS) on the USDA website. A copy of the history is provided in Appendix C. According to the history, the USDA ARS started in 1916 as an experimental vineyard. The USDA ARS was located on Area A. The document describes that activities conducted at the USDA ARS, including grape and stone fruit hybridizations. According to the document, Area B was acquired in 1989. Area B was reportedly vacant land and the USDA ARS began work to develop the property for use; however, due to the residential growth around the USDA ARS and the construction of an elementary school a half-mile south, the project was cancelled. The USDA ARS moved to Parlier, California in 1992.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 17
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

4.2.10 Prior Assessments
No previous assessments were provided to WKA prior to the completion of this report.

4.3 Environmental Record Sources

4.3.1 Regulatory Agency Databases
EDR® was contacted to provide a summary of facilities listed on regulatory agency databases (EDR®, 2020a). Table 3 summarizes the researched ASTM required Standard Environmental Record Sources, as well as several Additional Environmental Record Sources, as defined in Sections 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 of the ASTM Standard. For additional reference, the EDR® Radius Map Report with GeoCheck is included in Appendix D.

Table 3
EDR Listed Database
ASTM E
1527-13 Search
Distance
No. of Facilities
Listed
(within Search
Radius)
Federal
Federal NPL Site List NPL 1-mile 0
Federal Delisted NPL Site List Delisted NPL ½-mile 0
Federal CERCLIS List CERCLIS ½-mile 0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List CERCLIS NFRAP ½-mile 1
Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facilities List CORRACTS 1-mile 0 Federal RCRA Generators List:

Small Quantity and Large Quantity Generators RCRA SQG Site & adjoining 1 RCRA LQG 0
Landfills and Solid Waste Management Units RCRA TSDF ½-mile 0 Federal Institutional Control / Engineering
Control Registries
US ENG Controls
Site only
0 US INST Controls 0
Federal ERNS List ERNS Site only 0
State
State-equivalent NPL (Hist. Cal-Sites) Hist. Cal-Sites 1-mile 0 State-equivalent CERCLIS RESPONSE ½-mile 0
State Landfill and/or Solid Waste Disposal Site SWF/LF (SWIS) ½-mile 0 WMUDS/SWAT 0
State Leaking Underground Storage Tanks LUST- Reg 5 Geotracker ½-mile 1 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Indian LUST ½-mile 0 State Registered Underground Storage Tanks UST Site & adjoining 1 Tribal Registered Underground Storage Tanks Indian UST Site & adjoining 0 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 18
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Table 3
EDR Listed Database
ASTM E
1527-13 Search
Distance
No. of Facilities
Listed
(within Search
Radius)
State Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks AST Site & adjoining 0 State Institutional Control Registries DEED Site only 0 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites VCP ½-mile 0
State Brownfield Sites US Brownfields ½-mile 0
California Environmental Reporting System
Hazardous Waste CERS Haz Waste ¼-mile 0
Additional Environmental Record Sources
Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CORTESE ½-mile 1 DTSC EnviroStor (includes Cal-Sites) EnviroStor 1-mile 2 SLIC SLIC - Reg 5 ½-mile 0
Cleaner Facilities Drycleaners ¼-mile 0
HAZNET HAZNET ¼-mile 0
Local - County
Certified Unified Program Agency CUPA ½-mile 3
Regulatory information reviewed concerning the Site, adjoining properties, and the nearest facility in each cardinal direction identified within its respective ASTM search distance is detailed below.

The USDA Agricultural Research Station facility, 2021 South Peach Avenue, was located on Area A. The facility is listed on the US EPA Facility Index System (FINDS), US EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online, US EPA SEMS-Archive, RCRA Small Quantity Generator, the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) and the Fresno County Certified Unified Program Agency databases.

WKA reviewed the listing for the facility on the US EPA ECHO website. According to the ECHO website, no violations were noted for the facility. WKA reviewed documents for the facility on the Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Document Portal.

According to a Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Inspection Report, dated July 12, 1985, Mr. Timothy G. Souther visited the facility. Mr. Souther was told by USDA staff that mixing of chemicals was conducted adjacent to an irrigation well and that rinse water was applied to crops.

WKA reviewed a Twining Laboratories, Inc. (Twining) letter report, dated September 6, 1989, regarding the removal of a 500-gallon underground storage tank (UST) at the facility. According to Twining, the UST was rusted and pitted, but no holes were observed. Twining collected one Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 19
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
soil sample from two feet below the bottom of the UST for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and TPH as gasoline. Laboratory analytical results indicated that benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes were not present above laboratory reporting limits. A TPH as gasoline concentration of 1.4 milligrams per kilogram was detected. According to a Fresno County Department of Health letter, dated September 18, 1989, the facility received a no further action status.

WKA reviewed a Transmittal of Data Letter, dated April 23, 1990, prepared by ETS Environmental & Associates (ETS) regarding a soil sample collected from the excavation of a 250-gallon UST at the facility. According to ETS, the soil samples was submitted to a laboratory for analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline, benzene, toluene, xylenes, and ethylbenzene. The laboratory analytical report of the soil sample indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons were not present above the laboratory reporting limit. According to a Fresno County Department of Health letter, dated November 14, 1990, the facility received a no further action status.

WKA reviewed a Soil Sampling and Chemical Analysis Report, dated June 12, 1995, prepared by Krazan & Associates, Inc. (Krazan) regarding the removal of five heating-oil USTs that were located in Area A. According to Krazan, two of the USTs were co-located. One soil sample was collected beneath the co-located USTs and an additional soil sample was collected from the excavations of the other three USTs. The four soil samples were submitted to a laboratory for analysis of TPH as diesel and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH). Laboratory analytical results indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons were not present in soils beneath the co-located USTs. TPH as diesel was detected in soils beneath the other USTs at concentrations of 4.2 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 120 mg/kg, and 25,000 mg/kg. One of the samples had a TRPH concentration of 17,000 mg/kg, which was the same location as the highest concentration of TPH as diesel. Krazan recommended that additional assessment the USTs with highest concentrations of TPH as diesel and TRPH be conducted. Krazan’s map indicates that two aboveground storage tanks were also present at the facility.

WKA reviewed a Soil Excavation and Remediation report, dated March 27, 1996, prepared by Krazan regarding the USTs with the highest concentrations of TPH as diesel and TRPH, USTs #4 and #5. Krazan noted that the USTs were located adjacent to buildings, which limited the excavations. Krazan reported that 15 cubic yards of petroleum impacted soils were excavated from the two UST locations. Krazan reported that a structure to the west of UST #4 prevented petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils from being excavated. Laboratory analysis of the sidewall samples indicated concentration of TPH as diesel of 2,400 mg/kg and TRPH of 3,000 mg/kg remained to the west of UST #4. Low concentrations of TPH as diesel, 1.1 mg/kg to 6.5 mg/kg, were left beneath the building located adjacent to UST #5. A copy of the Soil Excavation and Remediation report is provided in Appendix C.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 20
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
According to a Fresno County Health Services Agency letter, dated April 4, 1996, the facility received a no further action status regarding the removal of the five aboveground storage tanks.

The letter did not mention the petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils that remained in place.

WKA located information regarding dry wells that were used for disposal at the facility in the Fresno County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Document Portal. According to a Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) Review of Work Plan for the Geotechnical Investigation, USDA Horticultural Field Station, Fresno, Fresno County, eight abandoned dry wells were at the facility. The dry wells were used for the disposal of sanitary and other waste waters, including laboratory wastes containing hazardous constituents.

According to a US EPA Region IX letter, dated November 2, 1998, the US EPA re-evaluated a September 1991 Geotechnical Report for the facility. According to the letter, contamination was identified at one of the dry wells at the facility (dry well #3); however, it was noted that the dry well was no longer used and had been plugged. The letter noted that “contaminants were detected in low concentrations and have low groundwater mobility.” The letter described that impacts were not detected in soil samples collected 45 feet below ground surface and that groundwater was 70 feet below ground surface. The US EPA determined that no further assessment of the dry well #3 was warranted. A copy of the US EPA letter is provided in Appendix C.

The USDA Agricultural Research Station facility, 2221 South Peach Avenue, was located at the Site within Area B. The facility was listed on the Fresno County Certified Unified Program Agency database. According to a Fresno County Department of Health Hazardous Materials/Underground Storage Tanks Telephone Call Record, dated March 3, 1990, the USDA had recently acquired the facility (Area B) and hit an underground storage tank (UST) during grading activities. WKA reviewed a Twining Laboratories, Inc. (Twining) letter report, dated March 22, 1990, regarding the UST. Twining stated that they collected a soil samples from the excavation of a 550-gallon UST several days after it had been removed. The soil sample was collected approximately nine feet below ground surface and three feet below the reported bottom of the tank. The soil samples was submitted to a laboratory for analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, TPH as gasoline, and TPH as diesel. Laboratory analytical results indicated that all analytes were below their laboratory reporting limits. According to a Fresno County Department of Health letter, dated March 27, 1990, the facility receive a no further action status. Based on the information reviewed, this UST has not impacted the Site.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 21
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

4.3.2 Preliminary Screen for Vapor Encroachment Conditions WKA conducted a preliminary screening for VEC beneath the Site using the Tier 1 vapor encroachment screening evaluation1
. The Tier I screening included performing a Search
Distance Test to identify if there are any known or suspect contaminated properties surrounding or upgradient of the Site within specific search radii, and a Chemicals of Concern (COC) Test (for those known or suspect contaminated properties identified within the Search Distance Test) to evaluate whether or not COC are likely to be present. The Vapor Encroachment Screening Matrix is included in Appendix E.

Based on the completion of the VEC-screening matrix, a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC does not or is not likely to exist.

4.3.3 Environmental Lien Search
According to a December 10, 2020, Environmental Lien Search Report prepared by Security First Title Resource, no environmental liens were recorded for the Site. However, an AUL was recorded on the deed stating that the Site must be used for a public purpose in perpetuity (SFTR 2020). A copy of the Environmental Lien Search Report is included in Appendix C. 1 The Preliminary Screen for Vapor Encroachment Conditions was based on the guidelines presented in the ASTM E 2600-15 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 22
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Data Gaps
The time intervals between the Standard Historical Sources (i.e., topographic maps, aerial photographs, other historical sources) exceeded the ASTM minimum five-year period.

However, the use of the Site appears unchanged within the time gaps, and therefore, research of the Site use during the time gaps is not required by the ASTM Standard (Refer to Section

8.3.2.1 – Intervals of the ASTM E 1527-13 standard).

It is the opinion of WKA that no significant data gaps were identified during the preparation of this report that affects the ability of the Environmental Professional to identify RECs on the Site.

5.2 Conclusions
• The historical land use research dating back to the early 1900s revealed that Area A was developed with structures and vineyards by 1937. Sixteen structures were present on the western portion from at least 1937 to 2020; however, eight of the structures were constructed after 1983. The areas outside of the structures were planted with vineyards from at least 1937 to at least 1998. A community garden has been present on the southern portion since at least 2012.
• Area A was occupied the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Station (USDA ARS) from at least 1937 to 1992.
• Between 1989 and 1995, seven underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed from Area A. The UTSs were located adjacent to structures. Petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils were left in-place beneath two structures. See Section 4.3.1 for additional information.
• The historical land use research dating back to the early 1900s revealed that Area B was developed with structures, vineyards, orchards, and ponds by 1937. At least 15 structures were located on the western and west-central portions of Area B from at least 1937 to at least 1979. Two structures were located on the southwestern portion from at least 1957 to at least 1973. All structures were removed from Area B by 1984. Areas outside of the structures were planted with vineyards and orchards or developed with ponds between 1937 and 1979.
• City directory reports indicated that Henrietta Fruit juices and concentrates operated at 2155 South Peach Avenue from at least 1962 to at least 1980. 2155 South Peach Avenue is associated with one of the APNs in Area B. Building department records Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 23
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
indicate that permits were issued to Henrietta Rancho Products between 1960 and 1981. The permits issued in 1981 were for the demolition of structures. • The City of Fresno provided a Grant Deed, dated September 25, 1952, to WKA.

According to the Grant Deed, the Henrietta Ranch Products Company acquired Area B from Mr. E. Pusey Cain. According to the Grant Deed, Mr. Cain had acquired the property on March 20, 1934.
• Notations on historical topographic maps indicate that a “US Experimental Station” operated on Area B from at least 1946 to 1981. WKA did not locate information regarding the operations of a US Experimental Station.
• According to a history of the USDA ARS located on the USDA website, Area B was acquired by the USDA in 1989.
• One irrigation well was observed on the northwestern portion of Area A. Two irrigation wells were observed on the central portion of Area B.
• According to environmental records, dry wells were used for the disposal of sanitary and laboratory waste on Area A until 1985. The dry wells have been plugged and abandoned. Assessment of the dry wells indicated low concentrations of chemicals were present around one of the wells. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) reviewed the assessment report for the dry wells and determined that no further action was warranted. See Section 4.3.1 for additional information. • According to an environmental lien search, no environmental liens are associated with the Site. However, an activity use limitation (AUL) has been recorded on the deed that requires that the Site be used for public purposes.
• Building maintenance activities may have included the application of persistent pesticides (termiticides) around the foundation of the former structures to prevent pest invasions, such as termites.
• Given the age of the historical development of the Site, it is likely that lead-based paints were used in the construction and/or maintenance of the former Site buildings. • Given the documentation reviewed concerning the agency listings for neighboring facilities, none of the facilities reviewed is likely to have a negative impact on the Site. • Based on the completion of the vapor encroachment condition (VEC) screening matrix, WKA concludes a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC does not or is not likely to exist.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 24
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 for the Southeast Fresno Regional Park. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 5.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the Site except the following:
• On-site concerns were noted from the mixing of agricultural chemicals adjacent to irrigation wells as reported by a USDA staff member in 1985. • On-site concerns were noted from the historical agriculture activities including the raising of vineyards and orchards and the potential for residues of historically applied persistent pesticides.
• On-site concerns were noted from the historical presence of structures on Area A from at least 1937 to 2020 and on Area B from at least 1937 to at least 1979 and the potential for residues of historically applied persistent pesticides (termiticides) and lead from leadbased paint to be present in surface soils in the vicinity of the structures. The concerns are noted from structures that were constructed before 1975 for lead and before 1988 for persistent pesticides.
• On-site concerns were noted regarding the petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils that were left in-place beneath two structures in Area A after the removal of USTs.

5.3 Recommendations
Based on the conclusions presented and the documentation contained herein, WKA makes the following recommendations:
• Collecting soil samples to evaluate for the potential presence of organochlorine pesticides, and arsenic related to the past agricultural operations at the Site. • Collecting soil samples from the vicinity of the historical structures to evaluate the potential presence of termiticides or lead from lead-based paint. • The irrigation wells and any other wells or septic systems that are uncovered during development activities should be abandoned in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations.
• If the City of Fresno provides additional information that would affect the conclusions of this report, WKA should be provided the opportunity to revise the report. • If the 1991 Geotechnical Report that investigated the dry wells can be located, it should be reviewed to determine if additional assessment is warranted.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 25
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
• If soils exhibiting evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon impacts, such as staining or odors, are uncovered during development activities, an environmental consultant should be called to evaluate the soils.
• No historical assessments or information regarding the operations on Area B were located by WKA. One UST was discovered during grading operations that was removed. It is possible that additional USTs exist on the property. If USTs are discovered during future assessment activities, an environmental consultant should be called to assist with removal and assessment of the UST. • If any fill material is discovered during future subsurface disturbance activities, the origin of the material should be determined. If the fill material origin is undetermined or it originated from a property with RECs, the fill material should be evaluated for potential impacts.

5.4 Exceptions and/or Deletions
No exceptions or deletions from the ASTM E 1527-13 standard were made during the performance of this ESA.

5.5 Additional Services
Non-scope considerations, such as assessment for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA), wetlands evaluation, indoor air quality, laboratory testing of the soils and groundwater beneath the Site for environmental contaminants (such as agricultural-related pesticides, termiticides, polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs], or arsenic and lead), and assessments for asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint were not included or requested as part of this ESA. Additionally, this ESA included conducting a Tier 1 vapor encroachment screening in accordance with the ASTM E 2600-15 Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 26
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

6.0 LIMITATIONS
The statements and conclusions in this report are based upon the scope of work described above and on observations made only on the date of the field reconnaissance, December 9, 2020. Work was performed using a degree of skill consistent with that of competent environmental consulting firms performing similar work in the area. Information regarding the Site that is publicly available and practically reviewable, as described in the ASTM standard, was obtained.

Additional research or receipt of information regarding the Site that was not disclosed or available to WKA during this assessment may result in revision of the conclusions. The conclusions in this report should be reevaluated if site conditions change. No recommendation is made as to the suitability of the Site for any purpose. The results of this assessment do not preclude the possibility that materials currently or in the future defined as hazardous are present on the Site, nor do the results of this work guarantee the potability of groundwater beneath the Site. This report is applicable only to the investigated Site and should not be used for any other property. No warranty is expressed or implied.

This report is viable for one year from the publication date of the report provided the following components are updated within 180 days of the date of purchase or (for transactions not involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction:
• Interviews with current owners/occupants and/or in order to identify changes in Site conditions or uses since the publication date of this report • Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens
• Visual inspection of the Site and of adjoining properties with emphasis on changes in conditions or uses since the publication date of this report • A current review of federal, state, tribal and county databases • The declaration by the environmental professional responsible for the assessment.

Environmental Site Assessments completed more than one year prior to the date of purchase must be reviewed and updated in order for the Environmental Site Assessment to be considered valid per Section 4.6 (Continued Viability of Environmental Site Assessment), and Sections 4.7 and 8.4 (Prior Assessment Usage) of the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard.

NMM:KMB:mr
H:/dept3/12987.01 - Phase I ESA Southeast Fresno Regional Park Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 27
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021

7.0 REFERENCES
ASTM International. 2013. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Standard E 1527- 13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (November 2013).

ASTM International. 2015. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM Standard E 2600- 15, Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (December 2015).

Department of Water Resources (DWR), Water Data Library, <http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary/> (December 2020).

Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), EnviroStor, <https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/> (December 2020).

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR®):
-2020a. The EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck, Southeast Fresno Regional Park, 2155 South Peach Avenue, Fresno, California, Inquiry Number 6281215.2s, Shelton, Connecticut, (November 25, 2020).
-2020b. Certified Sanborn Map Report, Southeast Fresno Regional Park, 2155 South Peach Avenue, Fresno, California, Inquiry Number 6281215.3, Shelton, Connecticut, (November 25, 2020).
-2020c. The EDR Historical Topographic Map Report, Southeast Fresno Regional Park, 2155 South Peach Avenue, Fresno, California, Inquiry Number 6281215.4, Shelton, Connecticut, (November 25, 2020).
-2020d. The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Report Southeast Fresno Regional Park, 2155 South Peach Avenue, Fresno, California, Inquiry Number 6281215.8, Shelton, Connecticut, (November 25, 2020).
-2020e. The EDR City Directory Abstract Southeast Fresno Regional Park, 2155 South Peach Avenue, Fresno, California, Inquiry Number 6281215.5, Shelton, Connecticut, (November 25, 2020).

Matthews, R.A., and Burnett, J.L., State of California Department of Mines and Geology, 1965, Geologic Map of California: Fresno Sheet [map]. 1:250,000. Capitol Heights, MD: William Heintz Map Corporation.

National Pipeline Mapping System, 2020, (NPMS), https://www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov/ (December 2020)
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 28
SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK January 27, 2021
WKA No. 12987.01 Revised: February 17, 2021
Norris, R. M., Webb, R. W., 1990, Geology of California Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.

ParcelQuest, 2020, Detail Report Property APNs: 473-030-07T and 481-020-29T and -30T, Fresno County, CA, Retrieved [December 2020] from the World Wide Web:
<http://www.parcelquest.com/>.

Security First Title Resource (SFTR) 2020. Environmental Lien Search Report, Southeast Fresno Regional Park Property (December 10, 2020).

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), GeoTracker, <http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/> (December 2020).

State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), DOGGR On-line Mapping System (DOMS), District 6, Northern California <http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doms/index.html> (December 2020).

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, <http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html> (December 2020).

FIGURES

Looking at an irrigation well on the northern portion of Area A.

Looking northeast at the concrete pad and wood frame on Looking at a former structure located on Area A. the northwestern portion of Area A.

Looking at a pit with a sewer stub on the western portion of Area A.

WKA NO. 12987.01
DATE

CHECKED BY

PROJECT MGR

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS DRAWN BY

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK PROPERTY
Fresno, California
FIGURE 5a
12/20
NMM
KMB
KMB
Looking at the community garden on Area A.

Looking northwest at the general view of the eastern
portion of Area A.

Looking north at the eastern portion of Area A.

Looking at the storage shed and area of nuisance
dumping located to the west of the community garden.

WKA NO. 12987.01
DATE

CHECKED BY

PROJECT MGR

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS DRAWN BY

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK PROPERTY
Fresno, California
FIGURE 5b
12/20
NMM
KMB
KMB
Looking east at the general view of Area B.

Looking at a concrete pad located on the southwestern
portion of Area A.

Looking at asphalt and concrete surfaces on the
southwestern portion of Area A.

Looking at the largest fenced area located on the
western portion of Area B.

WKA NO. 12987.01
DATE

CHECKED BY

PROJECT MGR

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS DRAWN BY

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK PROPERTY
Fresno, California
FIGURE 5c
12/20
NMM
KMB
KMB
Looking at an irrigation well within the second fenced area located on Area B.

Looking south at a small fenced area near the largest
fenced area.

Looking at the concrete pad and bollards located within the largest fenced area in Area B.

Looking northeast at the general view of the eastern
portion of Area B.

WKA NO. 12987.01
DATE

CHECKED BY

PROJECT MGR

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS DRAWN BY

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK PROPERTY
Fresno, California
FIGURE 5d
12/20
NMM
KMB
KMB
Looking at the irrigation well located within the third fenced area on Area B.

Looking at concrete rubble located adjacent to the third fenced area on Area B.

Looking south at the third fenced area located on Area B.

Looking at a concrete pad located to the southeast of the third fenced area on Area B.

WKA NO. 12987.01
DATE

CHECKED BY

PROJECT MGR

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS DRAWN BY

SOUTHEAST FRESNO REGIONAL PARK PROPERTY
Fresno, California
FIGURE 5e
12/20
NMM
KMB
KMB

APPENDIX A

RESUMES
NANCY M. MALARET

PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST
Ms. Malaret has been employed in the environmental field since 2003. She graduated from University of California, Davis with a degree in Hydrologic Science.

Ms. Malaret worked for the Florida Department of Health for four years. She assisted with the coordination of sampling potable water wells throughout the state of Florida. Ms. Malaret used GIS mapping techniques to identify private potable wells located near commercial and industrial facilities that may have contaminated the groundwater. She coordinated the sampling of the wells and the analysis of water samples collected. She worked with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to place filters on the private wells with contaminated water. Ms. Malaret also worked with the Health Assessment Team at the Florida Department of Health. She conducted human health risk assessments based on groundwater and soil data collected during contamination assessments of industrial facilities. Ms. Malaret used the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s Public Health Assessment Guidelines to evaluate resident’s risk of illness from exposure to contaminated groundwater and surface soils. Ms. Malaret used Risk Assistant software to determine dose estimates and compared the results with toxicological studies. Ms. Malaret’s human health risk assessments focused on sites with Volatile Organic Compounds, Semi-volatile Organic Compounds, and metals contamination.

Ms. Malaret has six years of experience in due diligence. Her Phase I Environmental Site Assessment experience includes wooded, rural, and urban properties. Her investigations have involved multiple parcel sites with extensive history, large-scale residential subdivisions, office buildings, gasoline stations, dry cleaners, and heavy equipment manufacturing and repair facilities. Ms. Malaret has conducted multiple corridor assessments along roadways being prepared for expansion or improvements. She also conducted a Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Assessment for the United States Army Corps of Engineers on a 20-mile stretch of the St.

Johns River in Jacksonville, Florida. Ms. Malaret conducted soil and groundwater sampling associated with Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. Ms. Malaret coordinated long-term groundwater sampling events for sites with residual petroleum contamination.

Ms. Malaret has worked with communities impacted by contamination, local, state, and federal government agencies, banks and developers.

Moody Property, Vacaville, CA: Ms. Malaret
managed the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment of a 38.5-acre property of undeveloped
land located in Vacaville to support the
redevelopment of the property into a residential
development.

Woodmere Property, Folsom, CA: Ms. Malaret
managed the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment of a 2.5-acre property developed with
an office building. Historical research of the
property included evaluating former mining
operations at the site.

Mercantile Property, Rancho Cordova, CA: Ms.

Malaret managed the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment of a 4.1-acre property developed with
a commercial building. Evaluation of regulatory
facilities within the site vicinity included the former Aerojet Facility.

HIGHER EDUCATION:

University of California, Davis
Bachelor of Science, Hydrologic Science (1999)
KURT M. BALASEK

SENIOR HYDROGEOLOGIST/DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Mr. Balasek has provided a leadership role in hydrogeologic and environmental consulting in the Western US. since 1989. His experience includes, residential and commercial land development, litigation support, permitting, regulatory compliance and technical team building. Mr. Balasek and his team have conducted a wide range of impacted soil and groundwater investigations, mine location and reclamation activities, water resource evaluations and conjunctive use studies. Mr. Balasek has supported municipal efforts to redevelop blighted neighborhoods using private and federal funding and has prepared successful grant applications for EPA Brownfield funding. Mr. Balasek has facilitated public stakeholder processes, organized public comments and used the information gathered from these efforts to prioritize neighborhood and regional site investigations and remedial activities.

Mr. Balasek specializes in unique approaches to problem solving and leverages nearly 30 years of regulatory relationships to assist clients facing enforcement actions. Mr. Balasek has saved his clients hundreds of thousands of dollars in reduced fines, monitoring requirements or realized project efficiencies.

SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Stockton Worknet, Stockton, CA: Project was
conducted for the City of Stockton Redevelopment
Agency and involved delineation, removal and
disposal for hydrocarbon and lead-contaminated
soil discovered during a construction project. The
project also involved a component of public
outreach because a children’s museum was located
immediately adjacent to the site.

Hayden Hill Mine, Lassen, CA: Project consisted
of third party review of mine closure plan for Lassen
County. Provided technical assistance to Lassen
County Planning Commission to facilitate
permanent closure of large open pit mine.

Willow Creek, Folsom, CA: Project involved site
investigation and subsequent removal of petroleum
hydrocarbon-contaminated soil to facilitate private
development of commercial property. Under my
direction, I facilitated the investigation, excavation
and coordination of closure petitions.

City of West Sacramento, West Sacramento,
CA: Multiple Projects. These projects involved
initial site evaluation of several hundred individual
sites for the redevelopment of West Sacramento.

Subsequent work involved site investigation and
remediation of several sites under U.S. EPA
Grants. Provided technical assistance to City staff
and collaborated with them to best utilize the public
funds and coordinate public outreach. Provided
emergency consultation related to peroxide release
at city water treatment plant and provides on-going
management and monitoring of groundwater pump
and treat system at the Port of Sacramento
Rominger Property, Winters, CA (on-going):

This project involves detailed site investigation,
hydrogeologic analysis and evaluation, and the
selection of appropriate remediation technologies
for a large plume of (MTBE) contamination on an
Ag-industrial site. Project involvement included
client and regulatory interaction.

HIGHER EDUCATION: PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS:

University of California, Santa Barbara Professional Geologist No. 6162, CA BA, Geological Sciences (1986) Certified Hydrogeologist No. 299, CA California State University, Chico Qualified Storm Water Developer MS, Hydrogeology/Hydrology (1990) California Engineering Contractor A-Haz, C-57,

APPENDIX B
ASTM E 1527-13 User Questionnaire
and Helpful Documents Checklist

HELPFUL DOCUMENTS
S O U T H E A S T F R E S N O R E G 10 N A L P A R K
Are you aware of any of the below-listed reports, as they relate specifically to the property? __ Yes __ No (if yes, please check all that apply):
□ Environmental Site Assessment reports (Phase I ESA, Asbestos sampling reports, etc.) □ Environmental Compliance Audit reports
□ Geotechnical Reports
□ Environmental permits (for example, solid waste disposal permits, hazardous waste disposal permits, wastewater permits, NPDES permits, underground injection permits) □ Registrations for underground or above ground storage tanks □ Registrations for underground injection systems
□ Material Safety Data Sheets
□ Community Right-to-Know plan
□ Safety Plan
□ Reports regarding Hydrogeologic conditions on the property or surrounding area □ Notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or relating to environmental liens encumbering the property
□ Hazardous waste generator notices, or reports
□ Environmental Impact Reports (draft and/or final)
□ Risk assessments
□ Recorded AULS
If any of the above listed documents are available, will copies be provided to WKA for review? -- Yes No
Completed by _______________ _
Date: ---------
Title:

Signature:

X
Josh Smith
11/24/2020
Associate Planner
No
No
No
No
Don't know
No
No
N/A
Don't know
Josh Smith
11/24/2020
Associate Planner
916-805-1281
Joshua Smith
N/A
N/A
N/A

APPENDIX C
Supporting Documents
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Eastern Fresno
Area, California Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
November 30, 2020
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.

They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.

Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.

The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
3 Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Eastern Fresno Area, California......................................................................13 Hc—Hanford sandy loam............................................................................13 Rc—Ramona loam......................................................................................14 Re—Ramona loam, hard substratum..........................................................15 References............................................................................................................17 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).

Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.

The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.

These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.

Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report
6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Custom Soil Resource Report
7 Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
4067160 4067240 4067320 4067400 4067480 4067560 4067640 4067720 4067160 4067240 4067320 4067400 4067480 4067560 4067640 4067720 257210 257290 257370 257450 257530 257610
257210 257290 257370 257450 257530 257610
36° 43' 28'' N
119° 43' 8'' W
36° 43' 28'' N
119° 42' 48'' W
36° 43' 7'' N
119° 43' 8'' W
36° 43' 7'' N
119° 42' 48'' W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 45 90 180 270
Meters
Map Scale: 1:3,130 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:

Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Eastern Fresno Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 13, May 29, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 28, 2020—Mar 5, 2020
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

Custom Soil Resource Report
10 Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Hc Hanford sandy loam 3.4 6.9%
Rc Ramona loam 42.9 86.5%
Re Ramona loam, hard substratum 3.3 6.6%
Totals for Area of Interest 49.6 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.

Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, Custom Soil Resource Report
11 onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.

Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.

These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.

The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.

Custom Soil Resource Report
12 Eastern Fresno Area, California
Hc—Hanford sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl5f
Elevation: 200 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans, flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, rise Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 16 inches: sandy loam
C - 16 to 72 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans, flood plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
13 Unnamed, channeled
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Channels on alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Rc—Ramona loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl8m
Elevation: 250 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 60 to 62 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Ramona and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Ramona
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
A - 0 to 12 inches: loam
BAt - 12 to 24 inches: loam
Bt - 24 to 38 inches: clay loam
C - 38 to 60 inches: coarse sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 5.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Custom Soil Resource Report
14 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Unnamed, fine sandy loam
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, clay loam
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, gently sloping
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces
Hydric soil rating: No
Re—Ramona loam, hard substratum
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hl8p
Elevation: 250 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 60 to 62 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Ramona and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 5.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Ramona
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Stream terraces, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans, stream terraces
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
16 References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 17 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report
18 Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 November 25, 20206281215.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
EDR Inquiry # Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:

Certification #
PO #
Project
11/25/20 2155 South Peach Avenue Southeast Fresno Regional Park Wallace - Kuhl & Associates 3050 Industrial Boulevard Fresno, CA 937276281215.3 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Nancy Malaret The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Wallace - Kuhl & Associates were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps.

The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.

The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. E047-45E0-87D2 NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY 12987.01 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.

Certification #: E047-45E0-87D2
Wallace - Kuhl & Associates (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,

WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 6281215 3 2 EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 November 25, 20206281215.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:

P.O.#
Project:

Maps Provided:

Latitude:

Longitude:

UTM Zone:

UTM X Meters:

UTM Y Meters:

Elevation:

Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:
2012
1981
1972
1964
1948
1947
1946
1923
11/25/20 Southeast Fresno Regional Park Wallace - Kuhl & Associates 2155 South Peach Avenue 3050 Industrial Boulevard Fresno, CA 93727 West Sacramento, CA 95691 6281215.4 Nancy Malaret EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Wallace - Kuhl & Associates were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.

NA 36.720995 36° 43' 16" North 12987.01 -119.715799 -119° 42' 57" West Zone 11 North 257452.75 4067360.68 309.00' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

7.5-minute, 24000
1981 Source Sheets
1981
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
1972 Source Sheets
1972
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1972
1964 Source Sheets
1964
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1962
6281215 4 3
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1948 Source Sheets
1948
MALAGA

7.5-minute, 25000
1947 Source Sheets
1947
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
1946 Source Sheets
1946
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
1923 Source Sheets
1923
Malaga

7.5-minute, 31680
6281215 4 4
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 2012, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 5
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 1981, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 6
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 1972, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 7
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1964 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 1964, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 8
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1948 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, MALAGA, 1948, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 9
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1947 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 1947, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 10
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1946 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 1946, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 11
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1923 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Wallace - Kuhl & Associates TP, Malaga, 1923, 7.5-minute
6281215 4 12
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Southeast Fresno Regional Park 2155 South Peach Avenue Fresno, CA 93727 Inquiry Number: November 25, 20206281215.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1998 1"=500' Acquisition Date: January 01, 1998 USGS/DOQQ 1987 1"=500' Flight Date: June 17, 1987 USDA
1984 1"=500' Flight Date: June 09, 1984 USDA
1979 1"=500' Flight Date: September 04, 1979 USDA
1973 1"=500' Flight Date: May 08, 1973 USDA
1967 1"=500' Flight Date: May 02, 1967 USDA
1962 1"=500' Flight Date: August 09, 1962 USGS
1957 1"=500' Flight Date: August 09, 1957 USDA
1950 1"=500' Flight Date: January 31, 1950 USDA
1946 1"=500' Flight Date: April 22, 1946 USGS
1937 1"=500' Flight Date: November 04, 1937 USDA
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 11/25/20 Southeast Fresno Regional Park Site Name: Client Name: Wallace - Kuhl & Associates 2155 South Peach Avenue 3050 Industrial Boulevard Fresno, CA 93727 West Sacramento, CA 95691 EDR Inquiry # 6281215.8 Contact: Nancy Malaret Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY

Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 6281215 - 8 page 2 6281215.8 2016 = 500'
6281215.8 2012 = 500'
6281215.8 2009 = 500'
6281215.8 2006 = 500'
6281215.8 1998 = 500'
6281215.8 1987 = 500'
6281215.8 1984 = 500'
6281215.8 1979 = 500'
6281215.8 1973 = 500'
6281215.8 1967 = 500'
6281215.8 1962 = 500'
6281215.8 1957 = 500'
6281215.8 1950 = 500'
6281215.8 1946 = 500'
6281215.8 1937 = 500'
488-1593
•·· ti. s. Dep~..rtment ot'.Agri9ulture Agriculturs Researah S•rvice Po.st Office fJO)( 0143
:?re n.'o, <;•11torni•fi:?.~7~f. : .

Attention.: Mr. ~~---bJton
septer:iber 16, 1977
1Su.bj,oc-ta Property ?,in,, betwoen 2021 South Peach and 'l'ract: 246j \ .

Mr. ~on:

SubReque,nt to our la~':. correspondon·oe, . further field invostigations hava been co:,r y·ir. - ~ .· 'As a e·sul t of · these inve9tiqations, ·it. ruu, CO!l\O_ to tn1;l '~t-;.t~:-:.i,li:~ that t a developer of lot 57 of the abQ.~~tf.~nc& t;.-~at. hn.f'. · ·:t&a~ fills against your fenca.

This offi~~ .. baa cont~~t._<;:f~ ,.:.h4; developer and initiated steps to r -ce1:fy t.hi condition. The final design to he approved by th.is: o:ffio will not.- al.low the placement of fills against the f nee t.ru.eture. · ··
It' you have any questi?~ or require further · assiet,mce, please contact thi office .. at ·4t58-l593 •.

RR/cg
Very _truly yours,
PLANNI"lG & INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
Building, Safety & CQnsllting
. Services
Rick :'R-".'1Som, Civil En~ineer I
488-J.593
August J.5, 1977
u. s. tiepar~mentdot Agric:ul.ture Agriculture Reaearch Service Post -- Office Box 8143
Fre~no~ California 93727
Attention: Mr. Larry ~-. Lofton
Subject: Ground Level of Properties Adjoiningl202l
S.:>uth Peach ·
Dear Mr. Lofton:
.upon receipt of your June 22, 1977 letter, a field investlnation Z·.or the above-mentioned proi:1ert.y was conducted in early July .

At the time of our field it1vestigation, no violi\tion of the builr~..,. f- "ing code was observed,- to e)fiot. Chapter 70 of the Unifor~ !iuil -.1- in~ Code allows a 2 to 1 s~ope transition in locations where gr.nde differentials are :rresent, providing lot a.ralna<:7e- is not ni re,-::tr::~1 onto adjoining properties. In view of onr field obsan•ations i'\nd the provisior.s of Chapter 10, this office cAnnot take nny ~cti0n at this time.

Please find enclosed the 011ncrshi!' for the pnrce.ls requested tn your letter.

If you feel that any condi t:.ions have changE:?<l Sl ncr~ our fj e] c~ fr. - vestigation was performAd p1· if you h«ve any further crnesti one; , please feel free to contact ~e nt 4g8-1591.

RR/cg
Enclosures
Very truly yours,
PLANNING & INSPrCTION DF.PAR~1-irNT
.Joe 0<'1}:ley
Structural :rngincer IV
Rick Ranso~, Civil Engineer I
• ' "' ,
APPLICATION flOR ffft~IT WORK PIRMIT • Cl'I V 011 ,Al 8NO ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THI! c1n 01' PII.BSNO PUBLIC WORKS llllPAkTMl!NT IPl!CIFICATIONS /'f l.,.:::oi,7- / '- .,~ 1,ci...... 14 17,.i.,-,rl~," 1-~-1-+-4-l--4-•-l.!.-+o-l'~l=4=-'-+-~"t-'~=~"i<-:,_.;c-"r+--••-'4-l',','+'""'f:::U.'f-+'+-T"""7 - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(~~~~~~~~~~~- ~ ~ .. r;- ~ ,c,,>- . d ,t "":,It/ C: F' (S" ,....,~ , ... .I•~... s; Ai'T'( =:t I'- '-
i

NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS
THII PIIIMIT II NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY AH AUTHORIZED REPRUENTATIVE Oi' THE l'UILIC WORICS DIRECTOR.

THII Al'i'LICATION MUST IE RECEIVED AND REVIEWED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DIV!;ION AT 111111 IAST -INLIY AVINUI! PRIOR TO Al'l'ROVAL, ANY WORK OONE PRIOR TO APl'ROVAL IS IUII.JECT TO IMMEDIATE REJECTION, ALL IN .. ECTIONS AlliO/OR JOii MEETINGS SHALL IIE SCHEDULED AT LEAST 24 HO~IIII IN ADVANCI IY CALLING THI CONITRUCTION MANAGEMENT DIVICION AT 48a-14151, HA'JE A REPRESENTATIVE -'TTHE JOBSITE AT THE SCHEOULl!D TIME Mamole"- Drain lnlell, Etc .... , .. @ SS0.00/ oa.

Se- Malnl . .. ... , ............ @) St .00/L F
Walet MIJl\1 ........... , .. , .. • •• @ SO.SOIL F
w- SeMce ConnecJlon .... ... GP sso.00111.

Traner, Bacldll •.•••••• •.•••••••• .••• ••••.• .••• •.• , Side,..111 ............. ..... ,.... $0.20/L F 5paclll Skla,..11
s ............ . s ............. . s ........... .. s ........... .. s ........... .. . ............. CBI ·::.. ale.) ................... . @I S0.401S F S ............ . c..rt,1 or GU11e<1 .. , •• ., ......... @ i<l.20/ L F I ........... .. Curt>1 a. Cuttlr.l ................ @ $0.40/L F S ............ . Drl.eway Approach • , •••••• , •••• @ (CUit> lne di1tanco)
$1.20/ L F S • ..r .... 111. I!:-
Valley oun..,. .............. ... @
SUHt Ligl\11 I. Signola •• • ., • • .. (il
TraNlc ConJrat
SI .OOIL F
$50.00/ea
(lent CloMa or dolour) •••••••• ,. (i) S25.0(J
Paved Slreel •••• ............. .,@ S0.04/S F
Pa"9<1 Aley .... ................ @) $0.081S F
Ollle< Special llama ... . .......................... .. TOlel I~: (Min. '100.0<I) . ••••••••• IUIIVIYING a l~'AKING ... . . ···
s ............ . s ........... ..
..............

I::::::::::::: -~
S.:.walll. curb, guttor1 a. drive appi:>acnea .
... • .. .. .. .. • .. • .. .. .. .. (il $0.75/L F (Min. $200.0<l) I ............ .

Sirffl or Mwer ~r aea
........................ @ $0.75/ 1• F (Min. $200.00) I ............ .

OtMr ............................................ I ........ .. . .. T-lune, a llellln9 .. . .. • .. . . . . .. . .. I __.

TIIINCHINQ IIEIUR,ACINQ
c..nt:,aie
....................... Qil$18.00/S F (Min. $15.J.OOJS ............ . Acp/laltCont;rete ~.r;ii;j ................... 11001S F (M1n.115000JS . .... . ... . .. . • .......... • ......... ,@112.00/S F (Min. S36.00)S ........... .. s.,.cun1ng . ..................... ,•. @$4.80/L F (Min. S9d.OOIS ......... .. ..

Tolel IIIIUll-.g ...................... ii :0::

TOTAL PIH
lnapecllon . .. ... ... .............................. .

S..M)'lo,g .. Slaking ..................... • ........ .. Troncll Reaurfocln(l .. , ............................ . TOTALDUl(MN) .................... .

P1ttrilaei0n la hereby gr1nled 10 Ille lbo.e 1:>l)lieanl to ao Ille above """1lbed -k: 1ncor,,p111nca wilh M.2. CNi>tll 11 01 llleFrtlllO MuNC,pal Cool.

By , •• ~?-:~~~• .... ~~:~~~.~.:;::;iJi_n, '
l:11pector J?,. l pL ,9,. /..Lo,-....

Dalo ChecJced 3 '...30 -B:3
Sta.kn Roq\!oaled
P!111Y ChkC 01 8111.

Work lo be done by Stnct Dept.
lupoctor'a Remarks

OPEN CUT
_.Q)?/~
___LOW€:

BORE
DATE: :?- 2- 8d
II s ~,m, K«ty,ye,.rn/ v
Zon: Atl ~~
~;au~.00
(, · TOTAL
.,d\C}~ CA~
1uo.oo
s\"l'ZEt. 0000-0000 333 --:i/28/88 ~~.oo
7282 OOl.'0-0000 333 3/28/83 Pn 1:11
ROUTINO: r, . ,\ Jr oJ
(I) Coiutru1:1l011 Mann. (4) Fi11&11cc .\ CY"".j ~I
(2) Coomuctlon Mp11 •• Arpli0Ut (S) pa I "- ,~1 (l) Con.ilr\lclion M11111. , ,i,,~ C '? i ,-\ {

CITVOPPUINO
DUAll'n,IIINT OP PINANCII
Bnlerprl• Ae«iunUna DIYlllon
2kt Marfpnae 81,
Pretno, CA tl721
u. s. Department' ot Agriculture National Finance Center P, 0, Box 600,~
reea for water and eewor hook-up at,
e. 2021 l?each Avr.,ia,, Freano, CA,
Water1
Sewer;
'.t\7mL
City foroe8 mill hook-up water cnly,
Feea for Sewer axe fees required only.
t • J/,:l "ll ,
I • •
$6,464.,~
:J,13~
$14,603.00
INVOICl: Nt .3714
:0.11 ~ !5, 1984
Amount fl4,603.00
JOI OR Order I 40-91H2•4•3108

ACCOUNT NO,
,uNO
581
617
Del'T JOIV, IIIIVINUE
25~ . 3180
AMOUNT
6,464.20
8,138.80
BY~~PJ,1D--L.=..t...::..::;L¥--<---I
~ CHECK □ CASH . 0 MONEY ORDER
250 3180
Pleue mak8 cblelc or moot)' order pe)'•
abll to ClTY .OP PRJ!SNO and ntum
with pmk oopy of Invoice.

TIIANJ.YOU
NOTICf TO CH[CK M:tlPlta.T
""YIIOIT
lllOITIPICATION l:

I t VIWOCAt ICANE
cnv or FRESNO . AOOtCT •LLotG AODRUs, •
usr.-A-NFC, ·p ·o 80X '60800
NEW'ORLEANS, LA. • 701~0 ·
CAlt -501t-'25!J-5370 ·OR · TOLL 'FREE · l-'d00-4Zl-0323 • I }
P" O ·• :40-91H2-lt-3108
INV·' ANOtr.'H ' · $14,603.00
13Tl4 '
~~HD/SEQ •N24349-02037
DISllURSIHO LOO
c~c~ A_IIOUlln
AMOUNT
Yl:NDOA LG. lllJlaO.
lt011"2~!1108 Cl<CCI< .. "111MATIOII
KANSAS' CITY ·
15 257 :991 .
$14,603.00 ,
· 12-17--84 '
.
~
. . ,: CREDIT ·-ACCY 'OF •USDA - AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Sl'.:RYICE .. . . ► •• I ' ' .. 0-0- .. •IOII
I'
I I

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
SEWAGE DISPOSAL ~YSTEM

FRFSIIO COUIITY

PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT
515 'o, Cedar Ave .

Prepare in Duplicate - Bring to office for review.
~ Sanitarian is on duty at the main office.

Phone for appointment at br.nch offices.

Fresn.o 2, California
Cl 5-9711 Ext. 351
l.
815 G Street
Reedley, California
MEirose 5_3q27
13th and 01 ive Streets
Firebaugh, Ca 1 i forn i a
Oliver 9- 2820
To Construct a Scwera1e System for --~..,.

Q~ . -~_fi ~ ~!.,,.,~fl. - .:;~_/ ~ -~-,.--·
location ___ _,,/Z_O~ L S,. rf?~~_a_::-_;;-<-C__·;_"' ______ _

2. Lot Size: Width _____ ft. Depth ______ ft. ---~--- Acres 3 . Appl icdtion for: Hew Sewage System _____ Addition to Old System ____ Replace System~!.--- lj. Building to
Resi dence
b.e served by p~rn p d '£/;;:/4,,,4' <,,( ~;:-.'""--"-'• •J; - ~ /U)• - ~ /fr~ No. ~edrooms _________ Garb~gc Grinder ______ _
Other -----------,1------------------------------------ _SJ.!.B.HL.G.E.H.E.RH, PU ILLN. DU P LI _C Al LW Lltl TJl.LJ_E.RM U ___A_Ul..l.UJ_LOJL 5, W~ter Supply:

J. For prcmi~es: Community .. _. .

DistanclJ to nearest well _ _.,._L,t{J_O
_ --p~ Well~ _ Private
ft. Private Well _ ____ Community
6, Sketch plot 1,>l.1n of proposed ctnstruction on revr.r_se ~id~. 7 , \~ho will inst~ll ~ystcm? __ _ - --··----·-----
I her~by 5tate that the ,~formation above and on the reverse side is correct nnd true to the best of my knowledge and ~el 1cf, I understand that th~ permit must be obtained before any constr~~tion on the buildi~q i1 st~rtcd and that nn inspection of the ~ystcm 1s recuired beDate of A::~:c::~::illin~ -~ t' </ S1qn1turc ,, - ~--~---~/,,/ ·- Date Permit Approved -- -- ~:~+11
SEWAGE.. DISJ'.OSAL SYS1DLS.PCCtr lC<\HOJiS TO. Di. COHf'.U:IED !lI S~N.l T/,.RlAN Septic Tank Ca pJ~ity -----· __ _ /5-~o g,11 Ions

APPLICATION FDR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
SEWAGE DISPOSAL ~YSTEM

FRESNO COUNTY

PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT
515 'o. Cedar Ave.

Prepar~ in Oupl icate - Bring to office for review. Fres~o 2, Californ i a CL 5-971 I Ext. 351
I.

A Sanitarian is on duty at the main office.

Phone for appointment at branch offices,
Ma_mt: _,, ,.·
To Construct a Sewerage System for
location -- ---~;to~ L
BIS G Street
Reedley , Cal ifornia
MEI rose 8-31127
13th and 01 ive Streets
Firebaugh, California
Oliver 9-2820

2. Lot Size: Width ft. Depth ft. ----~--- Acres

3. Appl icdtion for: Hew Sewage ~ystem _____ Addition to Old System ____ Replace System J -- II. Building to
Res•i dence
be served by p~ o,o d •z~4 ¥ ~--~ '9, •j . ~ /Z<>•~ ~ /17-,;.,.qNo. lfodrooms _ _____ _ ___ Garb.sge Grinder ______ _ Othe r -----------+--------- - -------·---------'--- - ----- _S-11..8./,1.LL GIH.ERH. ~ U ll.. lJl .11.lJ P .LJ C AJE __ WJ. llLT.H.Le..£ RM U-.-Alli l.lli.LO..L 5, Wat e r Supply: ·
a. Fo r prcmi~e s: Commu ni t y ----p~ Priva te We ll~ ___________ _ Distance t o nearest wel I ft. PrivJtc We ll Comr.,uni t y 6, Sketch plot plan of proposed construction on rcve~se side . 7, Wh o wi l l install system?
I hereby 5tatr. that the In ormation .ih,,vc ,rnd un the rcvcrso s1rle is correct and true to t he best of my knowledge and bdl tel. I und~rstdnrl thaJ thr prr~,t ~ust be obt~incd before mny COAstn•tion ,rn thu buildi{q i~ ~t.irtcrt ~no th.1t ~n 1n~occt1on of t~c syste~ ,s rccuircd before backfilling. L_ , /, ··-;;:::--~. Date of Appl icatinn C.· S I ·l l I c r _,. ;.. ~ - • .-1/ (,.. .-( Da te Pe rm it Approved
SEWl1G( DISPOSAi 'Y~1 11 I ,II If I IION, •n .I .!!I'll !l{• l!l ,~Nl!MllAH Sept i c Tank C~ µ3~it y __ _ /Sc>o . - - Census Trac t Mo, /!f-_ __ _ Sketch to scale plot plan sihowing:
a. Adj acen t streets and indicate which way is Horth
b. Property lineJ and dista~ces. ,
c. Location of proposed bullding and driveway.
d. location of large trees, rocks, or other obst~cles.
e. Location of any we l l, spting, creek, or other body of water. f. Show direction and approximate degree of slope.
g. Your proposed location 3~d layout for the sewage dispos~l system. h. Shew septic tank as known to exist.
·(· -~
.. . J .... r·
i'7,.,..r"'H•i...t-t-t-~-t-t-r-t-t1~t-r-~'"'.'"~"":'""7'"7':.;;.\....l....:..;..;. ..... ..:~...i....;_; .... :....i-yi... .... .i....i... .... .;..., L.L.l ... i ) ilH 1 t:ie ~ + ·t· !··· '. t ; ~
·••· ~,________•··•·~·'·~ ~
j'
j.:.: .. ····.·····•.
'
r ' ' ; :··1-
i, .. O# ............. .,,, •••••••••••••
......... <(
APPLICATIO~R STREET WOilK PERMIT• CITY .ESNO
,\LL WOkK RIIAI.L l'OMl'l. V Wl1'11 TIii! ('l'tt 011 11kliHNO l'lJIH.J<: WOkK, IIJWJ\ ll'rMrNr ~rl'.(1l'ICA t!ONS rif: ' :
· Jo!) Mdrt11t 2,
Mdreu: p. O• (3o)( L/-3'1:L .... f .... µ_.___ ___ ~ __ r.J..a.o_, CA~,._• .... 'f .... 3 __ 1.... 1 .... t __ ..._' .... ·11_y,_Fi.,...~__,,_,.,_o_._ __ By: fl~ A-,.)(Je.,P-,!;D,-J _t:1c: (0 ,?~ 4 l'h,,n•:z75. ----u""t""A""G,.a;R ... /\"'~"'1""0"'1'" w=o'"'R--K,..K,....EQ.,..,.,U,;alK-,l"' !l,..,-,"". ;',l,..,..l)""lt""· 11'"'·1"' ·1-, _N_O_R..,1.,.·1-1 ,1-N I> S II o .. TII I: hX 1ST , G AN I> N l: W WORK I ~·· ------·---H·---- --~;~ ---~,fA I -~ 1
n- ._ _I ___ -- - ---~--- - I - -- ~ --~----1-t--- -- --- ·-·- ,__ I --- - · - ... -- ··- I ___ ± ·- -- ----- ,- ,_ -· -·
;-- - - ------ - ,- - - ,_.. I i
·- I ·- I
- j i

NOTICE TO CC'NTRACTORS
TKIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNTIL SIONEO BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF TIIE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.

THIS APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVED ANO RtlEwr:o BY lHE CONSTRUCTION MANAOEMEN1 DIVISION AT 1919 EAST McKINLEY A\'ENUC PRIOR TO APPROVAL. ANY Dill' DONE PillOR TO APPROVAL. IS SUBJECT TO IMMEDIATE REJECTION.

ALL INSPt.CTIONS ANO/OR .OJ MEETINOS SHA i.. 6E SCHEDULED A'! LEAST 24 HC'JRS IN ADVANCE BY CALLINO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DIVISIC" AT 488, 4GI . HAVE A ll[PhESENTATIVE Al THE JOSSITE ., r THE SCHEOULEi) TIME INSl'ICTIONS
Manhol•, Drain ln1a11, Etc, , • ·• S75.oo/.. S . , . , . , , . , , _, M,ln1 .. 1 ........ • 0 S .50/L F S .. , .... , . ,
Watar Mains , •• , • ·x· , , .O $ .25/L F $ ••••••• , •• Backfill ln-1lon • , , •• , , • , , •• , •• , , , , .$ • , • , •• , • , , S~alkl , , • , •• , , • , , , .0 $ .20/L F S , , . , , . , , , , Speclal Sld-alk
(Brick, ate,) , •• , •• , • , , • . 0
Curbs or Outten •••• , •••• o Curbs& Outtan, ••••••••. 0 Orlwwoy Approach, .... , • JI
(curl> Uno dl111nca)
$,10/CF
$ .10/L F
S .20/L F
\ ,60/L ~
$ ....... ".
s . ....... . ...........
s ........ ..

Vall1yOur.1n •• , ••• , ••• .'f $ .60/L F $ ••••• , • , , • StrMt Llgh11 & S!Qnalt •• , • , .0 ,2!i OO/t ■ S , . . , .. , , ..

PaWd StrHt , , , • , , • • , , , .O $ .O2/S F $ , • , , , , •• , , l'a"°d Alloy , , • , • , , •• , , .O $ .04/~ F $ . • , • , , , • Other Specl,i ltomt .• , , • , , ••. , . , • , • , ... , IS ·/- "f . ;,,.._ , Total ln11P1<1lon IM,!p-~ .. , ~l-L.V.O:

SUrlVEYINO a STAKING elf i;, 7 - . . Sldtw lk, o.:rb1 gutttr1 & c.lrlve epproech11 • , , , , , • , • • • •• $ .22/L F (Min. $60.001
StrNt or "9Wtf grtde1
•••• , , , , • , , •• $ ,22/L F (Min. 180 00) $ , , , , •. , , , , Other , ••• , •• , •••••• , ••• , , • , , . , , , , , ,$ •• , , • Total SulYIY II> Staklnti, •• , •• , •• .$...__,_ __
TRENCH Rf.SURFACING
Concrete
, , , , , .. , , , . . 0 $.1.00/ S F (Min, $20.00)
Asph1lt Concrett
•• , , ••••• , • • 411 $4.00/S F (Min. $20.001
011 Dirt
s ..... .. . "
$ ......... s , •••••• , , , •. !> $3.00/S F (Min. S1O.00) $ . . , . . ... .... aittlng, •••.•••.••.•.

Tot1I R..,rfaclng IL' , , , ,
$2.00/L
• , , , ,
F
•• , .S
s7 ...... " .
~:.::E~~ ... ..................... z ...... . .. . Surveying & Staking , , • •. , , , , • , , • , , , ... , .s , , . , , , , , , Trench F:taurfaclng •• •.•. , ••. , •.• , , . • •.. ,. .$ .~ 7 f,Jtt!.: •••
TOTAL DUE(J063l • , , •.• , , •. S ;:;..-
P1rml11lon 11 htr•uv gr1,nDd to th• allow 1pplic.~t to do the Mbovt detctlbld work: In compll n01 whh At1, 2, Chept., 11 of 1n. Fre-.na Munclpal Code.
// r /) ~ WORKS Ol~ECTOR
By~o/i..J,..u,~_,.,l,~ .••. D110 /tt;~ 1./117 ..
_ln~spc~ct_or ___ .,.0~°;.4 /? 77::,:,.-i_.. Dato Checked //J .., ;;?.l'J - fl ✓/ St1kt1 Requested
Party Chief or Eng.

Work to be dono by Streol -Dept. __--
Inspector's Remarks
OPEN l'~ ~ DORE ai/4'L~QL DATE: fll/25/N
WE (Jt,;'Fllff ,c:-~ ~ '1&1,r.t~K,
....dfi,u0d:_ 1"?.. ,,.,,_,;;:(: Jf
.J'2-ep<,3<'/l Cv :-11, ') I' cl ' ~ p~
L1abi!ily ~wuacc & ,:, le_ z,,n~ A I-: C
'l'orfonrfa.e Bond ul' C-":) ----
_ v_•n_·ne_d _"YJ{)....:(.~~~_J_n_,c..!...c /0 ~25 tlt<f Payment KcvJ:
~OUTING: R e c e I v E
( l l Conslruclion M11m1. OC { 4)_ l'inance 0
(2) Conslruclion M¥tnt, T ~)J•~
(3) Con,lrumon Ma1~1ican1
R//r:rtnN Mf:M T.
l
l
j
j
-rL '
NOTE:
,
I
FRE~NO COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS & DEVl:~OPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
OEVEi.OPf,'IENT t:N"..INEERING
"Plot Plan Instructions"
For Non-('.t,mmercial Permits
First, sketch out you1 plot plan on sttratch PJ.pe1 accord1119 to tho instructiom bt!low. This will ·help you to draw the 1111;11 plot plan 011 the o:h.:1 sid" nf :his ~hcct.

FOUR BASIC STEPS 1-'OR DRAWING A PLOT PL...,:: ARE:

STEP 1. D1aw th,i cuUinc ,,f y,111, p;cm1Jrt•:. l',how the sides. front, and rear property lines with th,:ir dimensions. Dr all\ 1'1 "' row pointing t~ the no, 111.

STEP 2. If your propt>rty 1~ locat.:cl on.; comet draw in the st11:cts and 11J,n,i each of !hem.

If your property is loc,1:ed a!! ,1 cotnt>r. cJraw thP. I ranting street anJ nilme_ it. Then show the nearest intersecting c:css-strect. Gi~.i ;' ,t: r,i~tance to it in tP.et or miles ilnd r.am .. 1t.

STEP3. NOTE:

Locate all existing ~trnctures on thtl property such as corrals, huildings, pens, traile1 homes, rentals, etc.

Show !1ow e.ich stru,:turr: ,. t.JS"<l. n-.. ~mple; 2 r.m garage, shed, home, sleeping room, etc.) STEP 4. Locate the propo!ed grading wo1k ~nd drainage facilities 011 your property.

Give the dimensions of thft prop.-.~P.J 1rading work arid drainag:- faciliti(!S.

Give the distanc,i between grJding w~rk ana drainage facii;1,es to the side, to the front, and to the rc;,r proren y linr.s.

Show how c:;ch portion of grading loiork is to be tised. (Example: building pad, well pad, driveway, etc.) .

Provide ~.rows to indic:ate d1rec1 ie,n <Ai dr~in,tg" f •c,rn 1,2c!s arid d ·,v,•w .1yr I _,
! I
- i - 1-
1 - ·--· --~ l I ; . . - ---,- . - I , '
I i ,.- ,
I -+
t---,-, --+-~---- -
--'. 1 t-+- I • 1
-1-L
I !
White - ln1Pectlon
Car,ary - P1<minH
Pink - Accou11tlng
..... '
J COUNTY OF FRESNO •
PUBLIC WORKS c$ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ~EPARTMENT

DEVELOP MENT ENGINEERING
!
I l- _: i
GRADING PE AMIT PLO PLAN (OVER FOR IN_S_T_R_u_c_T_1c_1N _ s_1 _______ --r ____ -1 j
I
I
~--:-~~-f-
'
•
• ·I
l
j
N
r

1. -
I
i - - -----------------. _J
! -- -- ---·-i- . . ! I
I
I
-1.
t
BE ORE AN C TRUCTION IS S RTEO.

I 1-iEREBY STATE. UNDER PENALT :JF ERJURY, THAT THE INFORMATION A8¢,VE IS CORRECT. I UNOERST NO TH T A PERMIT MUST BE O!lTAmEO SIC~ATURE ---•~- OATF 5-a-5;s- """---
4 ;t•-
-~,,,, ::1· ' ~ ,,..
'l•l : ·
l .J
I
l
------
.·KE.Y . ' OFFICE COMPLETION
' , [.!)>PPP.CV~ I • • I • , t I 10 ll 11 II H It It 1r 11 II X.' 21 22 Ill 13 l4 21 21 SHOW THE RESULT ~:JOO □□□ 0 CJ □ :J :JO □ D [] :J =.rJ _J'.J ~ :_J ~ :J 8 OF ACTION TAKEN ilJ CORRECTION FOR EACH TYPE OF '.lJ CAHCfUATIOH II
SECTIClN :.J OAADINO
INSPECTION (!) FINAL
TYPE OF PROPOSED .. .. . , » » ISSUED ,. ,. .. ., .. .. IMPROVEMENT w w w ~ l.!J L!.I w USE CJ :J CJ :J 0 DATE DO 0~ 00 cC,,_. one, (IJM 0000 (S.. Franc) Mont, Dey Ylot
... NdOt\ on frO"lll numt>.-11 ~Ot'I 1,o,n honl)
I."' I ~~:J::ii-lff•H .:1:u••1~11
Con- "'°"" Dey Yl1t r.,,. Prog. Sul! F11>< A<:-
... .. . , .... .... ... , ...... ., 12 ., .. .. .. ' l • • Typo01ln1poCIIOn Romoru I
'--
I
-
' .
[XPIR/u ION Or PtlJt,i!TS

CONSULTANT COMPLETION
M ., N
'_J _J _J
CON~Ul T ,V, f
NO DATE CONSUl TAl'1T
SIGNATUAE TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIOfi S
H 10 ADDRESS INSTALLED
TOTAL NUMDrn OF CORRECTIONS
PERMIT o.Fer:.?;f;
PERMIT FINA.LCD
.llllNil,. r r 11111111 .. ...

L
0 :i,,,,, ... , ••
""

GRADING PERMIT
APPLICANT COMPLETE THIS INF~RMATION ONL V
THE UNOERSIGNEO HAS COMPUEO WITH AU. REOUIREMENTS OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AS PROVl0£0 BY CAIJFORNIA LAW
THE UN0£RSIGNEO IS LICENSED BY n,e DIRECTOR OF PROFESSIONAL A.~D VOCATl'' 'Al ~TANDARDS TO ENGAGE IN ,HE CONTRACTING BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CAllf OANIA AN~ SA1D LIC / ~ ANO Wil l BE MAINTAINEOIN FUlL FORCE ANO EFFECT CURING THE PERFORMANCE Of WORK AUTHOHll' , • ' 11$GRAOINO PERMIT
Th£ UNDeRSIGNEO IS EXEMPT FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S UCENSINv REOVIREMENTS AS PROVI DED IN CAUFOR• N:A BUSINESS ANO PROFESSIONS COO£ SECTION NO UOEs.c.,tt;R
CITYUC[NS(HO
t;R
1 ~£t~l1 I
~w

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
' 2600 FRESNO ST., FRESNO, CA. 93721 -360'
-._;,,, PHONE (209) 498-1375
1------------1 i~"' ~ l,-.-------------------1
I
-;J;-1
•-' ,_. . PLANNING-·APPRO\l'AL. . 1. PUAPOSEOF~NG \
{ ----fp,.. ' -Ke \"y\(:: ~
, .
--
. . .
. V A~U-A_TED COST ~. -

TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS
DOLi.Aii VALUE ONLY

INCLUDES ALL
~JS EXC-EPT □ □ □ □ □ d o D

WORKERS COMP
Pl.AN CHECK

PERMIT FEE
0 T FEE
Jt49
J096
309S
30"6
l
- ~-Lf-D -----,-- - ···-- ·r-' --· I
----- 1
SU!ITO<Al ---3~ 2s•,Gi:~(F-IAl .,_,lM~ --·--- ~
2 s•, PfRMIT MAN AG - _ ... _ _ ':,-}t:;;;
ACCT l',;Q 4 ~ - P[;.1,;9;;5,if}o·a-4'i -;s5CE-D~ ----- ----~/ ~-3-czs-_

ENGINEERING INSPECTION COPY

2. PLANS BY CIVIL ENGINEER STATE LICENSE

ADDRESS PHONE

3. GEOLOGIST/ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PHONE
4 APPROVED SOIL TESTll'<O AGENCY PHONE

5.CUT NUMBER OF CUBIC YARDS f ILL
0, ,._oMPACTION REQUIRED
SOIL

7. RETAINING WALL

REQUIRED WALL

8. MAXltilUM SLOPE
RATIO•
% A.C.

U YES U NO

IJ YES U NO
h<JRIZONTAL TO
5 % AGOR. BASE % NA

VERTICAL NA

9. BASE IA ENT/ SWIMMING POOL / OTHER _______ __________ _ WALL~ RETAINING :.J YES w NO BROKEN FLOOR :.J YES !.J NO ENGINEERED FILL !.J YES U NO FLOOR REMOVED '.J YES !.J NO COMMSNTS:
,_J PROVIOE 'AS GRADED" PLANS TO CITY OF FRESUO UPON COMPlETIOII OF GRAOIIIG )1J PROVIOE CO'-'PACTJON REPORTS TO THE CITY OF FRESNO FRO'-' '-PPR0\/£0 TESTING AGENCY '.J
'_J
A C.:STRUCTURAl SECTION SHAll BE INSPECTED A!IO CERTIFIED BY T~( EtlGl~([R Of RECOAO HO'.!) ON OCCUPANCY WILL BE IN EFFECT U1,f1L 'AS·GRAOEO' PLANS ANO CQt,4PACTION REl'CRTS HAVE BEEN RECf!VEO AND APPROVED BY l~[ CITY Of FREStlO l ¥

I 1• • I
. ··- • I
•• I
I
/ ,, "'
., I
L ;r
,c,
.. , .~
I
~
........ ._ ... . .,.
:~•
1----• - ---· ···"t--··· 1!
l, .
' · ..

Ii -!
" 2.
" :.: · ;;
> ,..
. "To, Ml". Schiff
ftlOM t Wto • • Peanin,tori
P•AO, I ·Tvo
DA r J1:u• 21, 1960
1&. The trashcan used in ahop ahould always be OOT•Nd 'Iii th a lid.
· S. ·,ill looaely-thrown 111&torial on the outliete rear area ot the lltnct.un pe remoTed~·

6. Sbaalct yc>\l decide on Item #3 (b), the present. 4 lb. t1N a•. t1D1U1•• would then auftic• la: the rear work ·ehoJ>• • :
• r
· 7. Ha'9 all fire exti!)iUishere hung on Rl.11, height not to exoet4 S• 2• on the top por}ion !'~ utingu11her. All ext.inc,d.llher, to be N"1c:ecl anr.:wly' • or ilmnediatdy atter each uN, b7 a coa- · pete11t er.iplo)"ee or a collllllii'.l1:;al fina. · U &li7: add1t1onal a1sietance 1a desired., please do ·not hesitate to call: thia :orf1.o•~ ·•.
>: .,,r•"..,f' .,. ..... .......

Vary tl"lll.y yoare.,
'I'
Wm. Pennington ·
State Forest Ranger . .
... .
210 South .Academy h'••
Sanger, California
Mr. Leonard 5ehi1'f1 Proj e-ct Supf:rviaor
u. s. Dept. of Agriculture Research Service
4816 East Shields Aven~e , •Fresno, California
. I .. Dear.~.• Sc¥,tti
-
June 20, 1960
At your re~est, a Fire Prevention Inspection or your prnd.ses was made b7 .a representative of this department, acting in teh8lf of the Mid Valley County Fire Protection District, a politi.c~l subdivision of Frt:sno County.

Oar recommendati,.ms are as follows, ·
l. The office area can be adequately protected With , thc 2t g~l. soda-acid type extinEfJ.isher. «e · suggest tilat it be ' relocated ~n the front portion or the otfi~~.
2 •.· The chemical-t:,pe extinguisher should remain in the laborator;n but loc;• c.c in a consp~cuous place. · ). In regard to the area in the back or the office now being u6ed for general storage and repai·r ehop. Nonniillly thes(' functions ars in the Group F, Div. II, of the Unifom Butlc:iing ~oce, however, you UE exceedirg the li?Ditation by- alloYir.g welding and open £lam,. This faljle in the same group, but in Div. I, therefore, our recoIT1J11enda-q!.one ~re, · ·( a) The l'!tructure el ther bo connrted to 1,e accepted for that type occupancy , or
(b) That no welding ~e allowed ineide the building; and that all nammable ~erial--paints, \.h!.nners, . ctc. be housed o~ the outeide o~ the building in~ 111etal cabinet, properly vent1l11ted; and with "no 11111oldrig11 81.gnti•posted conspicuously. . ..
xxxxxx:x.xx:xxx
210 Scutl Acadeey Aveni .e
Sanl!ttr CA111'orni a
Ju~ 6, 1900
Irr. l.aoruu;:i·~sohU!., Project Sll rviaor
• U.S. ·D,pt..· ot Agriculture Researoh Service
1'816 East Shields Averrue '
l'ftsno, Qalito~a
- Daar Mr. Sc;hii'ta
xxxx
.,
- ·' ·_ •f~?s~ ~ inspection let;er of June 201 196o, 1re have 0 continued· to 'study , , •~·- _tl'e ~•utionary meaimres -to pe taken ror the ' protection ot yau:r _person- . · · _nel ae well· ~ firemn enteri~ the buildine during the period that you aJ1Y have the radio active oape~le in too concrete pit located at the ~outh- .'f{) ·, -~
. '
; '.,.. .. -:. .. ~ .......
·,·. "t 'I:,
'
~-.... .. -: ,,. .. :',
west comer ot your buildingo · •. .

Official s·o~ces advises that a tlTo (2) inch lid or lead ahield1ni ia :nec:e:,i,ary- over the pit while tlhe capsule is bein~ stored. :.r;us m.11 -sh~ld • the .capsule :trctm fire o:;;- .heat~ as vmll as giv& t:-:o :!'i reracn protection rr01:1 any radi&tion from the capsule caused by heat or fire falline into the pit·. 'I! any addi~ional assistance is desired., pleRse do not he~i~a~ to call thie office.
' ' 12/d
Very truly yours, .

Wm. Pennington .

Sta te Forest Ranger .

P' CALIPORNIA HSOUICIS AOfNCY • • fDMUND O, lllOWN, Q...,.,,,., INT OP C:ONSHVATION

ION OF FORESTRY
JaDUU7 10, 1968
, . . ": • . 1-. pq,o!laae, Wt do not beU.ffl •117 _,.,.,. aned SA "'11Da thil t,,. tire .·-~~- 111DUl.d bo comi.deft.d SoOd 1in ~ .pncU.cN •
.... .,.,,... uapeotlAg )'Ml' plurt, Vitia 1'°"' and Vill MD ■ NiDepeoticla of "PJZ' ianallaUon &ppraxi11iately' o&ie YNf boa tbiar date I if )"OU no ~sire.

Vof7 trlllT ,nn,
Wl4. PJIM.m0!Cl(
~'mt; JOJ:IS'r HIJIO.ti
"' . .. -
,4t~AT~E ~o!;f~CA~ll~,o~•~N~IA;;-•:!£~SO~U~RC~~S~A~O:!,EN~C;!Y ___ '""F~_,.."""'"=--==,,.,.. ...... ------.'::I=~~ 0£PARTMENT OP CONSERVATION
oiv1s10N OF FORESTRY
210 South Ac~dcmy Avcnun
S.np!', Cali!'ornia 936r;7
Dr. J. H. Weinberger, Horticultlirlst
Crope Rei,carcb Divisfo'D I
2121 :iouth fea eh Avenue
Fresno, Call.rornill
Dear Sir:

Jam.1,1u•y 10., 1968
lie: FIRE .Pl<.h'VE.h'l'lOi.'-
InopectioM
A Fire PNYeotioo inspectioo 11as aade oE buil:tinga at the DtrpariaePt ot Agriculture ~rty located at 2121 Sout.h .P+aoh Avezrue, Frecl'lO, oil Januaey 5th, 196(3, by our l'1re Prnentioll Ottic(ar alld stor.t. We !cund senral aiDor dei"iciencieD that. ve 110'\ld l1ke t.o c::Qll to 7our attenUoc and t.he:r are listed a., .follows:
(1) !be ••toJDObile prage aeaiped t.o one oE )'Our a,ployees llville on t..">e pre111i:sc::
•-.ld be olea11ed up and any unwantoo •terial ubould be disposed oE. We .teel tmt autollobUe praaes abould always be kept in a Udy COl)dition, s111ce vc uperieDCO any t'ina in pngea.
(2) · Ac:q11ire an addit.:2~1 Soda A.cid tire extinguisher for your i:-.dJl office and it ebollld be mzt in a coospic11012a location at a hoigbt not greater than S1 211 1'rolll tbe noor. All i'ir:: extin~hcn. !IIUSt. bo ccrviced annWllly or .illllledi.atel;r 111rter ODT uao, 1eh1cheTer coees f'i.Nt.
(3} Im-ull a tire hydra11t !or 1.sc by- our Hr.:1 .Dep:irtmerrt at a lccatioa nearest to the hor1t ~ ;your buildinp ~ that in tb3 event a .1"1l•e deportment :1187 h!rro to oc:nblrt a r1nt Oil your pnmiJfo• eut.ticicnt \:4t.er uy- be acquired trom )'Ottr 16,000 pllon Naervoir. Cbo:ncGa are that lie 111ll probably dra!'t water directl.T trm your ruenoirJ bowaver, there is a c~Dc~ that ill n .f'l:.turE: date tbe opes>'lllg to the rueno!r •;r be obst:ructed !roa ttithc:r a bldldi.Dg, oE a structure., or gl'Olli.ng oE pl.ante. lil u,- event,, we en loo)fing towards the evailabilicy of :an adequat.e aou,:e ~ water b'OII .aa hydrant, if at all poasible.

Aa ,,. :S.Dlicat.ed to you chad.n6 our v1sit., ain:1.mml sue or t.be •le outlet. should be 2i- naticn:a1 standard pte nlve.

BelatiTe 1.o JWI' question aa to tho ai-omotril'luoromethlilsie tire extinpinher. Be adriHd we brro researched this izltonaation and have dotendned that it ia a chemical Rbataace foniarly Jmovn u heon-'-Jel. and 1s n011 known as Bronotrif'1uorcmetbane. other DIJne8 U.t this LxtiJ:liu.bbcr bas bcell clasdtied utdcr has been S.l.01:11301 N,d ~CIIOtn. It was orie1,rl6ll,T dneloped for use ill aircraft e'Dli,De 1'1rea and 1"lamoble Uq1&1d end electrical fires. It 1a rated as M..h relative et.tect.1Yeneas 1-y t.be ~ ud b described in the 11tr.rat.un= H .a liqudied gas and like Carbon Dioxide that dbcmrgee like a £i~.

We are not acquainted with thus t)'JIC tire extingtrl.sher and we aro oot rocoaaencting that. you blQ' thia' .tire extinguinhc:r as ll i:l.rpluf: itetr. wil.eas ;you test t.bc oquipcnent

NT OP CONSIIIVATIOM

ON OF FORESTRY
~• Jolm M. lfal'V8)', Imeet.~tion Leader
!DMUNI> 0, UOWN, Ocm,nor
January 101 1968
~. tJaat :,ou ·•,. ~e to bum o.t.tice paper and dcbri, within t.be 11J-f' District. 1lnii · tboqb we hno 11.atod eiX datici:lno!.u, ■ indicat.ed abon, ve fMl 1ft bave a huard-!ree building•~ "e an very proud tblt. 7ft aN in OUJ' Fin Proteation . , D!atz-ict. ' . " .. ~· ·
:f
:.-~-'
~
--
,will
•,~
~not
ccm:plied
·slce a
uith,
rdnapection,
einc• 'WO
•s
t"l
.,. noniall,r
you and your
tlo to
people
d~
oa11 Tory
1t tbue
oompe~
~
, -~Uy. any cxittillg be:urd. '
ftriretcre,··l:e ww !!!Ike I reinepec:tion 'next yoar or during •131' otber ti-= ,OU 11181' t l'eq\le&t tbilJ ottice to asaiet you again.

V fl'r7 truly youre,
STAT! Of CALlfORNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY
DEFt,.RTMiNT Of CONSERVATION

DIVISION OF FORESTRY
210 South Aced-,- A,-enne
S.npr, C.litoniia 936S7
•
Mr. Jobi, M. Hane,-, liiveetiption Loader
Muket '-lit,- Diruiol'.I
11,. S. l>.pa~t 0£ Ag:ricultUN ~-...~1, . .,..,.
hee-ao• Celitonlia
».oz- Mr. lian•y t ...

I
January 10, 1960
lie I FW~ .rnEVDlU1,m
Ina~cU.010&
A' !'in Pnrnirtion :1ner,ect.1on ~ac 1118dc of the praitisee oc..::upiod by the llepartmcnt ot "cP'iCftllture, iJlcl\ldini· all buildinge \lnder your supen-iaion, on ,':asmary Sth, 1966. ™8 inapeation wa:, roqueated by you~sel! and we vere Ycry happy to asaint you in oaZT)'ing out thie :!napection in orde:t to develop and expose an:r tire baurd vhicb oould Gin • .

Wo bin listed belc,w oovcral •ainor ~icieilcie21 that we £eel should be eliminated 1Jll order to •kc )"0U.r pNmises conplcttely basanl l'l"ee. {l) Do bOt allow any- cardbonrd containers to be u~ed as wa~tepaper besic£ts. • (2) The door ot the 1:~sement. should be clos..ad .:t all tilr.ce .and G sio~ oo the door •botud ilxlica'te tM.3 ol'd.er. Further, identti'y thet door as 11baaeirent 11 so that (f'fe%7• ODe vUl ·ahuye lalow _where the door ll!lsc~ to.
(3) iielocate 'tbc coraprossor to a building noo1 u&t.-d for bouaing equipment. and anot.Mr coapnaaor. vis have always .telt that compressor:i should never be located tmdcr ·• ouildin& when. people arc aasi1,gnc.,d to -wc:rk in. Fire DepartmentB experience MllT tires starud by c011preHors and the p.othetic p.irt ,., ,ut t.bi.B i.s that it may l:cm tor ecver.-1 bo111"1i bdore they a111 dEit£cted or to a period liihcn it. ie too late . to do aa,t)dJic with a tire. We feel thu deficiency 1B ~ gre.1t i1UpOrbnce and N voald cerlataJt' l.1b to :reCOIIDCDd that. you take baediate action to eliminate tbe ocapreasor aow located 1J2 10"IJ' ba11e:iae11t area. . ,· ... .. : ::,. (h) · l•ecU.ateq do away vitb several Carbon Tetrachloride !'ire m.tinguishers noM located vi~ 7WJ" buildiJls. '1'b3)' are ex~ly dangeroua to work with and are Ulepl tor ue by any ono other than Paci!'ic C'-E.o & Electric emplo)"Cee and lire Departaenta.
(~) Hefti. all tire minguieberti oo . w•ll- in conapicoo.il!S locetions at a height not putel" tball s• 2• tro• the t.)p ~ the .tin exti..<'. ~>iaber. Thoee !"iX"O extin&Uishen .. t ~ serviced bllnediately ~r any use or ".iir.t:i lly, "Wbicbovcr comec tirzst. (6) Acquire • Fire Pernit !l'01111 the neareBt ;~id Valley Yire Diatrict etation so ,.

City ol
FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT FRESNu

FIRE DEPARTMENT
450 "M" STREET FRESNO, CA 93721
PHONE (~09) 498-1023
11 l.;zJDl-2-J I l ol2J 1 l£lc~k1'.ICl/fl I I I I I I 22UJ ADORHI NUW.SIR OIR STREET NAME ZIP COO£

TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
I O NEW BUILDING 9 0 NOJ;CE & ORDER
IO ADDITION 1~ 0 BLOG MAINTENANCE UNDERGROUND FIRE SERVICE MAINS l O ALIEliATION i: 0 PERMIT RENEWAL
4 0 REPAIR 12 0 FIRE REPORT
~ D DEMOLITION I) DH c .o.
, D RELOCAluN "D PRE -SEWER
7 0 FOUNDATION ONLY I~ 0 RE -ROOFING,
I U TENAHT liolPROVEMENI X: T-1.,,_/:...f

PROPOSED USE
IIIDUITIAli.
mmmrn
01IlaJC!l
O .. ONE FAMILY O PUO n
D TWO OR MOR£ FAMILY DOD CNTER NO OF UNITS
O MOTEL. HOTH n

D DORMITORY

ENTER NO OF UNITS DOD
OJI!)(!][] D SWIMMING POOL
11011 ,RIIIOlllfl,U
..
@(i](i][i]
§8°8 o§o ODD
0000
c~mmH!l
mrnoo
ffi[!](l]QJ
[!]0[i]QJ
[!](!]I][!
(!JffiOO
mm□□ [tJ[!l(!)(]
ODDO
00GIGJ
D
D
8 D
D
D
D
D
D
D
:J
D
D
D
D DODD D mm□□ ~ □~~·
SAN~

DOCTOR 'S OFFICES

HOSPITAL, INST

INDUSTRIAL

INTERIOR
OFFICE ANO PROF .

PUBLIC IJTILITY

RECREATIONAL

RELIGIOUS

REPAIR GARAGE

RESTAURANT
RETAIL

SCHOOL/LIBRARY/EDUC

SERVICE STATION
SHELL

SWIMMING POCL
WARlHOUSE

WHOLESALE

OTHER -SPECIFY
TOT Al SQ FT OF

FLOOR AREA

COUNTER

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
OTHER
FIRE
(SUBTOTAL)

ELECTRICAL

PLUMBING
ACC'1 NO
315G
'---+---I
$ __ _
3052 S ----+----l
F!RE CONSULTANTS COPY
3" DIA. OR LARGER $20 + $.60/ft X ft -
2 1/'l'j" DIA OR SMALLER $20 + $.40/ft X ft -
HYDRANTS $20 EA X
FIRE SPRl~JKLER SYSTEMS
SPRINKLER HEADS $20 + $.80e EA X
OVERHEAD PRESSURE TEST $20 EA X
---- CENTRAL STATION SUPERVISION $20 EA X
---- LOCAL ALARM $20 EA X
PREACTION, DELUGE VALUE ETC.$50 EA X
FOAM SYSTEM $80 EA X ---- PUMPS
DIESEL (LISTED) $200 EA X . ELECTRIC (LISTED) $160 EA X ELECTRIC UNLISTED $80
WATER STORAGE TANK, SUCTION, AUTO FILL ETC. $80
CO2 , HAI.ON, ETC. $50/TEST X - ---

ALARM SYSTEMS
PANELS $20 EA X
DEVICES 0TO20 $5 EA X
DEVICES EACH ADDITIONAL DEVICE OVER 20 $3 EA X
MINI HORNS $1 EA X
FLAMABLE LIQUID TANr<S (ABOVE GROUND) $00 . c, CONSULTATION $40/HR X PLAN CHECK $40/HR X ,5 .:J..()

OTHER (SPECIFY)
OTHER St>ECIFY)
D THE UNDERSIGNED "!AS COMPLIED WITtl All R£0UIREMENfS OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AS PROVIOEO BY CALIFORNIA LAW. o t~tiwrr.:1~:~ng~i~~~11:5t~Js;.J~ ~~Rf;Ji~A~~ !;;i'll~bO:.tii :~g :zg~~'{~~LE ~J~~?i--~~t 1~ MAINTAINCO IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT DURING THE PERFORl,CANCE OF WORK AUTHORIZEO BY THIS FIRE PERMIT.

D THE UNDERSIGNED IS EXD,,1PT FnOM THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AS PROVIDEn IN CALIFORNIA BUSINESS ANO PROFESSIOllS CODE SfCTION NO ► .... oO
OID
:JI
m
"' V>
}J
\).
~
---
U\ '
~ I;\
Cl)
C
~
I?
z
=t
z
!)
:J

HERNDON
s
i /~ ~ I .. ~~ ~ °'PINED 1/E ~ ::l ~
'-, ij s: :>; [(] s
I " I I " lo ;;: r'\.
" 'cncr:NDR ,
:,.
~ FIG
~ G R I!,' 'V
COPPER
Ji,,-./---f..)-1----1----1
1,I INTERNATI NAL
~
h ff --+--+---1 BEHYMER
~-rs\ V ~ ~~ ''
-
""t...,_•...L.L-~--''c--~PERRIN
~7 ~l--

SHEPHERD
B~ .,., '<
~/ g ~
:<
--+--+--+---!TEAGUE ~
::s ~ !!; ' ; ., .. ::l el
" ~ ::, tl ~ "
~ el
1 ' I
NEES
~ !-------jr,7(;<----lf---1 / ~IERRA [(] .,,

HERNDON
~ BU LARD J. ' BU LARD / '-i-r-'-----n--~~+.----lw----i1-1---11-,.,..J---+---+---l BARSTOW cl
...
~ f!i ._, .. SHAW
' ~ "' [(]
"' ~ lt----'--~f---h4'---IGETTYSBURG
;; ~ :§ :; 1:: "'
ASH='''')---
1+--+--+--N--t-- 99
~~·l..____-+-+~~',;j-----j
DAKOTAI---t---t----lt----1---t---t--~__,'\,. ,-1---f----1-....i--'1 ..=Se,H.,c1E"'U1"f--t---J--t-+-f----+-+\:_0.~'-.;-+-t---"-J--t4.-+-f--<~- ._ ~ .. " "' iil s: ~
,,f' ~
HIIH--1--1~--t---t--fl;;'',----'-'j;;TTASe,He,"TNc____,__'--~;,_...--+-__::L-iAsHLAN "' ~ "' CLINTO .. f---+---1~+--+-f---+----1--J--'\r,---t-~t----J=-f-tt'~t--"j\-t--:~:==:=::::==:=JMcKJNL oy F ',R - £~ SO"- N Q . ~
s \ ;;:
!J
,. .
o;
t,:i
-
----1--1----t DAKOTA

SHIELDS
t--+-----<----1CLINTON
McKINLEY
/ V
~6§ ' -~
.. ~~ " ' A.T. & S. R. ;:; l:l f{l
OLIVE t----i---t--t--+-t---t----+---t-+-'<!sr--~t---J---rohi'!"ifi+-'is;"f--c '.j~;:::::~~#,rs--+-+-r---jf-----+---+---J:.OLI:::_VE:___ }!ELMO. ~Y!£~-l-+-+----+-+-+---+-+-l~~~_:},~-14J,:"'m='.'.!6"3· T -, , ... ·---+---a1-l188_11=-1---r-----l ~ ~ BELMONT lo
s PT.C. R.R. I §t---t--.--t---+----+--
~ NIE 'EN ~~ HUNTINGT N TULARE j;;~1.1 ) '.. \\_,
WHITE BRI r.E ,---. ti BA'nH '- KI.NGS CANYON -"-'=""-="F"--'--+il118rJcl+--'+--+--'--+--+-~-'-c-~--,--~ VENTURA =

KEARNEY

CALIFORNIA
CHURCH
~ JENSEN fi!
~
~ "' "' .: ~ ~ r:i :;j ~ "
= -~ ' ~ \. BUTL R
'~+--f---+--'J
~ ~ AN/ ,DAL,
~ 8
.. [;j ~ ~ !:: ::l
ti ij s:

BENCHMARKS

BASIS OF ELEVATIONS IS A FRESNO
CITY BRASS CAP MONUMENT, BM #576

ON CURB WEST SIDE OF PEACH AVE,
103" NORTH OF CALIFORNIA ALIGN,
76' NORTH OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS.

ELEVATION - 306.878
" el
tl

VICINITY

NOT TO SCALE
MAP
BUTLER 1--t-----i
~ 0
1:: '"
~
\ .T . .!: S.F. p R.
\
~ f!i
§ ~
~
can Two Working Days Before You Dig!
JENSEN
NORTH
r-, CENTRAL
"'
..
(!i
~
~ AMERICAN
------------------------------------------------·---

I N D E X

DESCRIPTION

COVER SHEET

EXISTING SITE TOPO

SITE IMPROVEMENTS

IRRIGATION LAYOUT

GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
SHEET NO.
2 3
4 1. WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY OF FRESNO STANDARD

SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND THE FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT'S ENGINEERING HANDBOOK OF SPECIFICATIONS.

2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE

SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AND SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION PRIOR TO, DURING, AND AFTER TRENCHING, JACKING AND/OR BORING. CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE AT 811, 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING.

3. PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED AND FEES PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FRESNO.

4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL EXISITNG STREET SIGNS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TO REPLACE ANY ITEMS THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

5. STRIPING MODIFICATIONS, WHERE NOTED ON THE PLANS, SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ALL REQUIRED UTILITY RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING OVERHEAD CONFLICTS.

7. ALL STREETS SHALL BE SURFACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PLAN AND THE CITY OF FRESNO SPECIFICATIONS.

8. INITIAL COMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE CITY. ANY REQUIRED RETESTS SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR.

9. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS SHALL IN NO WAY BE CONSTRUED AS A GRANT BY THE CITY OF ANY RIGHTS TO

THE CONTRACTOR TO TRESPASS UPON LAND RIGHTFULLY IN THE POSSESSION OF, OR OWNED BY ANOTHER, WHETHER SUCH LAND IS PRIVATELY OR PUBLICLY OWNED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM

ANY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER GIVING HIM PERMISSION TO ENTER HIS PROPERTY FOR PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING THE IMPROVEMENTS DELINEATED ON THESE PLANS AND TRANSITIONS THERETO. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A COPY OF OWNERS PERMISSION PRIOR TO START OF WORK.

10. ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS WITHIN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PRESERVED OR RESET BY A PERSON LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

11. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGED AND/OR OFF-GRADE CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ENGINEER, PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.

12. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH 2007 CBC, CFC. CPC, CMC, AND CEC.

MIi' IXlffl€I! !G19' ,,
~4"1'>\.USII ..
~
I
i I
I'
I.!
,I'
..
"'
l'l!I
'I'
..
!El
,f'
~
<..
a,
, ..
..
0 @
®
..,,
Q
$
i'C
..,

CITY OF
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ·-...____

POWER POLE

WATER VALVE

IRRIGATION VALVE

CABLE TV PULLBOX

GUARD POST
WELL

ELECTRIC PULLBOX

GUY POLE

GUY ANCHOR
GATE
IRRIG.STD PIPE

CONSTRUCTION OF

COMMUNITY GARDEN
2021 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE
A. P. N. 4 7303007T
ZONING AE-5
PLANNED USE: PUBLIC FACILITY
PROPERTY OWNER:

PROPERTY CONTACT:

CONTACT ADDRESS:

PHONE:

SYMBOL LEGEND
,I" ELECTRIC PANEL FACE
,p GAS VALVE

H,B HOSE BIB
0 SHRUB
1§1 JRRIGATION VALVE BOX
J"' ElECTR!C METER BOX
d'" GAS METER
•• ELECTRIC UNDER GROUND {USA MARK)
•• GAS UNDER GROUND (USA MARK)
*' LAMP POSf
0 CONIFEROUS TREE

CITY OF FRESNO

RANDALL COOPER
2326 FRESNO STREET, RM
FRESNO, CA 93721
(559) 621-2900

ABBREVIATION LEGEND

AC ASPHALT CONCRETE

ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS

B BEARING

B SW BOTTOM OF SWELL
B.F.P. BACK FLOW PREVENTER

BM BENCHMARK

BP BEGINING POINT

BTM BOTTOM
C CURB

C&G CURB & GUTTER

CL CENTER LINE
101
RAIL ROAD CROSSING SIGNAL WITH ARM 0 TREE STUMP CON CONCRETE JOINT POLE ..,
DECIDUOUS TREE 4"'
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE Ill
SEWER MANHOLE ,..

SEWER CLEANOUT

SIGN (AS DESCRIBED) -
J'
PALM TREE •,w
PROPERTY CORNER (AS DESCRIBED) ffiil

SECTION CORNER (AS DESCRIBED) ,,,

SEWER VENT DI DUCTILE IRON
ELECTROUER DIA. DIAMETER

WATER METER DWG DRAWING

TELEPHONE RISER BOX E EXISTING

OVERHEAD GUY EL ELEVATION
TELEPHONE POLE ELEV. ELEVATION

GAS UNDERGROUND SIGN EP END POINT
STORM DRAIN INLEJ" F FUTURE
BACK FlOW PREVENTER FBR FIBER OPTIC F AGILITIES

FL FLOW LINE

G GUTTER

GB GRADE BREAK

GND GROUND
I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER
INV. INVERT

L LENGTH
MIN. MINIMUM
M.S. METERING STATION
NO. NUMBER
o.c. ON CENTER
p PAVEMENT
P.W. PUBLIC WORKS
R.C. REINFORCED CONCRETE
s SLOPE

SCH SCHEDULE
SPEC. SPECIFICATION
STA. STATION
STD. STANDARDS
TP TOP

TYP TYPICAL

USGS UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
W.M. WATER METER

W/ WITH

APPROVED
Cln' OF FRESNO
DEVELOPMENT DEPAiHMENT
JUL 2 3 2009
C1•·rv r·,r: r;: ,:·::c.N .. 0 I I \-, - . -V•
DE\IELOPf,;E~'T r'li-FJ/\R":MENT
BAvr'- ('V c•,:;:rK~[J , \LC" t:

Any changes to
Developrn
ed by t17e .. , .• o>cs not
"NS-,
DATE J. 1,.'°!,_~CJCt
STRUCTUR/\l. --¥"'----
BUILDING -----1----
MECHfa.NICAL --+-----

ELECTRICAL----/----
PLUMBING ----\-----
PROJECT DE'ilL -+----t,.
brant t

GRADING
PLANNING/ZONll•IG
PW File
Proj. ID. CITY OF FRESNO
Fund -~~\>l--=-:=-=---=---=--=--=--::..::==-:..:...=--l-------------~-~~------1 Department of Public Works
Or ' CONSTRUCTION OF RevieuB Ref. &: Rev. ~ / · -- £T.T COMMUNITY GARDENS Project Engineer ~ 2021 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE ,
1 or. By: RWM Sfheet4N•-~1-- •Ch B . o -~--Sheets I • Y••~~~- COVER Date: 7/14/09 I Scale: A,, Noted JX - E-XX ',
I
\ I •
i . l I
I I
\ \
\
\
\
NW \';jlj'f.lt~ 1~@tlON 17
14/21, 3/4" IP FLUSH IN

PAVEMENT
: X 306.50
'
''l" Ii ,, ·i ; I :~"'--t-, ·---:- .--:,:1 '·· 'f•.""''·""·-· 1.i ,, ( : :Jii!io;~·o ., ,; ... x·Jo:riti.,:~_..:-.~.·:_:_ · :"io&:n J ..... ___ .. . l . ·'- ·--BOJ--!t.,·· ··. -· ··· f .:·: ~--_,. · .. ·.: ~',""'!
. \:

X 306.65
DT
''"·'""J;" ,.,,
! '
* ..30.1. 5.3 ~,006¼'o BLDS - 't:lb.!fJS
X 306.61
~J7ss 8, 7
; 1~7.03
OT
X 306.83
OT
X 306.61
DT
X 306.51
DT
X :306.34
DT
0 C 0
x301.10
OT
X 307.00
X gdl.50
)( o/1, 53
x 2Bs.7o
OT
x306.74
OT
-B,_.,?3,- X 306. 40 ._., OT
X 306.58
DT
X 306.27
OT

CONSTRUCTION SYMBOLS
6-FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE

RAILROAD TRACKS

PROPERTY LINE

SECTION LINE

EXISTING ASPHALT AREA
'1

UNK FENCE
X 307.07
DT
X 306.99
DT
X 307.85
-"S/hss
X gs6.84
DT
X 306.57
DT
X 306.52
OT
X 306.58
DT
X 306.28
DT
, OT .

X 307.15
DT
x3o7.16
DT
X 307.67
~ X S'&a.63
OT
X 306 . .32
OT
!it X 306.48
OT
X 306.33
OT
X 306.39
OT
X .""38'
OT
X 307.31
OT
X 307.17
OT
DT
X 308.11
·Joow W 6 E D BAO PAV
X O 16
T
~- 307.08
,JjgD OT
X 307.51
..JQL.1.] __ ,
><ii{66
:2-00-------- ~. 307 64
x SBs 29
DT
X 306.22
OT
xJos.14
OT
X 306,i2
DT
X 306.14
OT
X 3ih · W 6 8 D OIL DIRT
X· OT
X 306.98
X 306.99
DT
X 306.71
OT
X 306.29
OT
X 306.12
DT
0 0
X 307.60
DT
X 307.20
DT
X 307.35
DT
X 307.15
DT
X 306,88
OT
X 306.47
OT
X 306.61
DT
X 307.89
OT
X 307.47
DT
X 307.52
DT
X 307.45
OT
X 307.22
OT
X 306.56
0'
X 306.63
OT
X 307.90
DT
X 307.59
DT
>< 307.56
OT
X .307.52
DT
X 307.37
DT
X 306.99
DT
X 306.77
OT
3/4" IRON PIPE
TAGGED RCE 1 3352
E 5' CHAiN LINK FENCE W U~161 BENT
:J< 08Gl53/4
X ij6 @3
X
or
"'
'
z
;,'
:r:
_o I
co
3§8.57
DT
X 307.96
OT X 08.55
t;. T
z
w
l,_
"'
z
_J
z
;,'
I
0 X 30 7.35
DT DT
-' X 306. 6
OT
1 <.>
~ 3/ 4" IRON PIPE
w l!foa~;. BENT
e,.,... y 3!??,j,&ao_,_bcc-<>o--0--=4~~-=~--"'-"'·"""'.':_:':_:";;..,.==="fil=~=6,.,' -:~;;H,~Al_:N:L:!N~K~ . .:,F,:;E~NC~E~~:13~~,Jl_:_3!~ ¥L_ ·----------~~~--------·--- --------

APPROVED

CITY OF FRESNO

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JUL 2 3 2009
CITY OF FRi.:SNO
DEVELOFI ~ENT DE!'fa.RTMENT
BACK CHc:CKED
DATE _______ _
srn_ UC".' URfa.L -~· 8U11-D!NG ---- _,_ __ _
MECHANICAL .. /--"''-----

ELECTRICAL
PLUMBING _________ _
PROJECT DE' ·. '. -----
GR/,.DlMG __ .-------
PLt,NNING/ZC:·,:t·,!G ------

SCALE IN FEET
i ,5---i
PW File Department of Public Works
Proj. rn,_,_P:'jCOm00n84~C:'..!I~TL_Y!__~0!}_F~!'F~R~E~S1_1_N'!'0':1._L Fund _ 6 Or 179901 CONSTRUCTION -OF .. l .. Revi•~~d ~/ -
Ref. & Rev. COMMUNITY GARDENS , ~roject Engineer ~~f!!_ 2021 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE 1Dr. By, RWM ::••l4No. ~heels
EXISTING SITE Topo i~~t.~·'1114/09
I scale· Al! Noted IX-E-XX
L---------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-~---~~----------~1 __ . ' 0 ;."lsT J7
rnrn
r-r J..-.-J ~
-~~ vm
SHKl!BS
:,.;r:-J·--_ , __ ....., ___ ,.
....

INSTALL 2' HIGH 4X4 WOO
,-,fJ, ."i~-
<C'

ARDEN USE AREA
PPROX. 3 ACRES
20,443.1 SQ.FT.)
95 PLOTS
----------··------,----·
-, t; / ..

ROAD BASE ON _, V - MAJOR DRIVE ISLES
..l'
!~~;-~-~:::_,
7=-:---=::..7
~~~ :
6 ' 5r• POSTS AT EACH CORNER OF

EACH PLOT TO IDENTIFY PLO
BOUNDARIES (TYP) cc.ce _____________________________ _L_ ______ ~~----------------------------------~-- NW CORNER SECTION 17
14/21, 3/4" IP FLUSH IN

PAVEMENT
NOTES:

1. PROVIDE APPROVED POLICE/FIRE BYPASS LOCK ("BEST" PADLOCK MODEL 21B700 SERIES OR ELECTRIC CYLINDER SWITCH MODEL 1 W7B2) ON DRIVE ACCESS GATE/S.

2. ALL PRIVATE STREETS AND DRIVEWAYS 11-lAT ARE PROVIDED FOR COMMON ACCESS

AND ARE REQUIRED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO A MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF 20 FEET. FOR DRIVES SEPARATED BY A MEDIAN, 15 FOOT MINIMUM LANES ARE REQUIRED.

3. STREETS LISTED SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS FIRE LANES AS PROVIDED IN THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE, SECTION 22500.1. DESIGNATE CURBS AS FIRE LANES (RED CURB WITH "FIRE LANE" IN 3 INCH WHITE LETTERS EVERY 50 FEET OR APPROVED SIGNS EVERY 50 FEET).
4- PR0\>1DED NOTE ON SITE PLAN: PROVIDE SIGN(S) (17"X22" MINIMUM) AT ALL PUBLIC ENTRANCE DRIVES TO THE PROPERTY WHICH STATE "WARNING - VEHICLES STOPPED,

PARKED OR LEFT STANDING IN FIRE LANES WILL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED AT OWNER'S EXPENSE - 22658(0) CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE - FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT 621-2300."

5. LOADING ZONES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN REQUIRED FIRE LANES.

6. NO HEAVY EXCAVATION IS TO BE CONDUCTED IN THE FIELD AREA. EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE TO BE MAINTAINED.

7. ALL PATHWAYS ALONG THE ADA ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL NOT HAVE A PATI-lWAY SLOPE GREATER TI-JAN 5% OR A CROSS SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%.

PROPOSED SJGNAGE

NO OVERNIGHT PARKING

NO STORAGE IN PARKING LOT
0 CONSTRUCTION SYMBOLS
INSTALL 6-FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE
INSTALL 3-INCH COMPACTED LAYER OF ROAD BASE
iNSTALL SUNCAST CORPORATION 10 FOOT BY 10 FOOT STORAGE BUILDING MODEL A01828C03
INSTALL 12 FOOT SWING GATE.

INSTALL TRASH ENCLOSURE CURB ONLY PER CITY OF FRESNO
STANDARD P-33

CONSTRUCTION SYMBOLS
~;;c:-;~
),;.;,--=.=~
F---'----C:C-,C,C-.;
L~:--___ -·:-_.1
_______ ...,..
6-FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE

RAILROAD TRACKS

PROPERTY LINE

SECTION IJNE

EXISTING ASPHALT AREA

PROPOSED ROAD BASE

GARDEN PLOT

ADA ACCESSIBLE GARDEN PLOT
ADA ACCESSIBLE PATI-l OF TRAVEL
2 5'
(
0 0
w
F
\
( VARIES
n.• TO 96"
'..._ CORNE:R POST
3~ O.D.
,..

TRASH ENCLOSURE
PER P-33 j ..------~--~-------------100''---'-------'-------------'s.-----+-----.. I ~-,---o---,<>----¢--◊----<>---'\---<>---o-,--o-----<>--:--O--'<~-O---O--:-~-<>--,-o-----<>---,---<>--0-,--0---0----<>c---,-0-----<7-<>-'---c~,- C - 0 l ~1 <:
7 '
.,
ro
b
b '
I
.--------,--24'------- ,
' g'
.,,--:STRIP PARKING PER CITY

OF FRESNO SPECIFICATIONS

NO STOPPING SIGNS
R26F (CA) -~~

PARKING
SCALE: 1 "-1 O'
CITY OF Fi1ESNO

SEE DETAIL A
FOR PARKING_ SYMBOL

SEE DETAIL C

FOR ACCESSIBLE

STALL DETAIL

LOT LAYOUT
"j
_________ __,1;
19'
20'-4"
J
I

EE DETAIL B
FOR SlGNAGE
SIGN SHAU. BE ~CTORIZED \llllH THE INTERNATIONAL SYll!BOL a:- ACCESS1BIUTY. SION.l.OE 1$
TO BE A MIN. Of 70 SO. INCHES WITH SEALED TEXTURE. SET 1 3/4~ SQ. GALVANIZED SlEEl POST IN'rO
1'-rl' SQ. ,c 2:-0" Of'. COOC. FTG.
7 '
DEVEL0Fi,1ENT D1=PARTMENT
Bfo,C!< CH,.::CKED
STHUC:URAL --1-#'lc-+---,
BUILDING --"-4:V--+----1
MECHANiCAL ... L---+---t
ELECTRICAL -----J-----t
PLUMB1NG ----+-----r
PROJECT DEVEL --+---t
GRADING ----+--t
PLANNll,GJZONING ---l----r
ACCES$191UTV SHALL
CONSIST Of" A WHITE fJGlJRE AGAINST A BLUE
BACKGROUND. THE Bl.lJE

SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE
COLOR No. 15090 JN 6
FEDERAL S1D. !!95o
11---INlERNATI°"AL SYMBOL~ PRE-fllirSI-ED ACCESSIBLE
PARKING SIGN PER llTLE 24
N SIGH SHALL INDICAlE VAN ACCESSIBLE"
2" DIA. GALV. S'TEEL PIP£
CONCRETE WAUi.WA Y, BLOCK
OUT FOR SIGN FOOTING WllH
-'"'-='-"'""'--' l.~L ___ .FlBROUS EXPANSION JOINT
6' CHAIN _,,-- LTh'K Fli:NCE --

RESIDENCE SIDE
PROPEB'~TY LlNE ---
~ ·. ~ rt _, . ~-- ~
1 p :
__ 1t
-TYPICALMow Strip

CITY OF FRESNO
1'-0" DIA. cotve. FOOTING
0ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMB~~ NlS
SCALE; NTS
PAINT \liHEEL STOP 8UJE
(BLI.€ SHALL BE EQUAL TO THE Ca..oR No. 15090 IN ~RAI. STD. 595,a {E) 6" HIGH
C6N<:R£1E
CURBlriG
PAINT 12" H.

LETTERS W/ THE WORDS "NO
PARKING" IM

THE UNLOADING
ZONC
ACCESSIB\..E
PARKltfG
'""""-

SEE DETAIL A
PW File
Proj. ID. PC00084
Fund 36
Or 179901
Ref. & Rev.

CCESSIBLE PARKING

SIGNAGE, SEE DETAIL B
E) EDGE OF PA \.£MENT
NOTE:

MAX. SLOPE
IN ANY
DIRECTION AT AOO'S9"'-'

PARKING
l~OT TO EXCEfD 2,r. m>.
t 17" MIN. I THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW MINIUUM
Olt.lENSIONS AND REQUIRED lEXT. SEE Pt.ANS FOR ACTUAL L0CATI0~. (REC1.AMAT10N SllE AND ID.EPH0NE
#-+-<'" W. PA!NltD SlRIPJNG AT
Y-o~ O.C., m>.
f-iUt.lBER TO BE DE1ERl,Ht£D BY 0\\t-lER)
!lj~
~ 0 ~&'tl0Afb.~JNAl>l·6l~~ous
J .I • .,. ' OFF STReET PARKING FACILITY
App O - "' SIGN SHALL COMPLY w/ C,!,,UF, •. ": Al)MlNIS1RA111,£ CODE 'nTLE 24, PART 2. SECTION 2102. (;!IY F FRE%P CCESSIBLE SIGNAGE
SCAif![~LOP 1EN DEPN?~AT EITTRY SCA!.£: NTS
JUL 2 3 2009
Any ch~nges to these Ian
Development Depart'ile t t 5. must be approved by tf111o r;rant to e.~y person i-e ~g-'t 1·e 15 f
1 ~?~cs cf a pc ·r•Hi do~s nvi
B II O\IID.:,eC.('JGrS,- al:,,., y s; ~•T'-""' 0
-------- Department of Public Works
Project
l

SCALE IN FEET
Review;d ~
Engineer~ ?tT

CHAIN LINK FENCE CONSTRUCTION

DETAILS
l<tf . .&: R£V.

AUG., 2002
P--45

CITY OF FRESNO

CONSTRUCTION OF

COMMUNITY GARDENS
2021 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE

SITE IMPROVEMENTS
1 Dr. By: RWM
:Ch. By;__; ___ _
'Date: 7/14/09
! Scale: A:! Noted
Sheet No. _ __,3,_ __
of 4 Sheets

I X-E-XX
14"
I ,
i I , I I I , ' I
I· I !
I I '
i ' I I I
' I 1 I
' I
I I :
•. I
\ I I'
i : I \ I, -:_ \ I , I \ i
i \ r
i I:
i ' ! I I I :

I I
I I ~l 1 1 Ii
ir I I

I ' - ' I I I
I ! i :

I
I
I i\ I ' ' ' '
I .1
I
\
I
I
\ I ' ' ' ' ' ' j I ' ' I ! '1
'
j L_
\
\
I
I
I
' ' I
I
I
\
~ro "!1 ~ -- - ~_! r
NW CORNER SECTION 17
14/21. 3/4" IP FLUSH !N

PAVEMENT
. .
ll'ITT
,..._;......._,.
1LJ_ ' .. ,,
'-,--,.. ~---~-.- _j. t,ITT J,_J, --t.~~1......J LJ
··- --- --- _,./f;J;
17 LJ
r:

I
--,-----j
l
•."-,,,,,,_,,~ ![c,,
i
'
L ...
i 1
'
' ' -
-·- ---
,_ '
. -·
--
.: ·. '" I. - -

GARDEN USE AREA
APPROX. 3 ACRES
(120,443.1 SOFT)
96 PLOTS
--
,, -- -- ·-·.o . .,.
1,., .. ,-,,: ''
•:.cc·.• •. :•·• ... ' --- ...
.:• ''·'"''""
-
'
..
'
,. --: .. , ;--,_------- ··-.:·--;i
;- . ::::.::-_·_::· .'.' .: :·i
l-"'.:-.,:7.:::.-,.,-:-.=c·:,.,i
'- '-------- ' -- -· __ ,
"""7
6 l
),
i
i
y
'
¢
'
f1--"½'~-{Ti'P) '

IRRIGATION LEGEND

SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
- MANUFACTURER
- MODEL #
II-Sr NEW IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION
- INSTALLATION BY CITY OF FRESNO
cm NEW ( 4") WATER METER (METRON SPECTRUM 440) AND 4" SERVICE LINE -

INSTALLATION BY CITY OF FRESNO
B BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY (4")
- WILKINS - 375 OR EQUIVALENT W/
WEATHER GUARD BLANKET (PER CITY OF FRESNO STANDARD DETAIL W-11) •• GATE/BALL VALVE
- PVC (1f UP TO 4") - LINE SIZE AS NOTED
PRESSURE MAINLINE - SCH. 40 PVC PIPE
- DEPTH TO BE 24" TO 30" BELOW GRADE.

II ¾" HOSE CONNECTIONS WITH 4X4 POST (SEE i'° HOSE BIB RISER W POST DETAIL)

WATER PRESSURE CALCULATIONS
STA TIC PRESSURE (PSI): 33 PSI* ASSUMING 33PSI AT THE METER

WATER PRESSURE LOSS CALCULATIONS
# INFO DESCRIPTION PSI LOSS
1 4" 4• METRON SPECTRUM 440 7.25
2 4" 4" WILKINS 375 BACKFLOW 7.25
3 240' 4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE RUN 2.11
4 225' 4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE RUN 1.98
5 135' 2" SCH 40 PVC PIPE RUN 1.19
6 100' 1 r SCH 40 PVC LATERAL 0.88
6 10% FITTING LOSS (10% OF MAINLINE LOSS) 0.62
7 96
- i " (96) f' HOSE BIBS N/A
8 4" & 1.511 GATE/BALL VALVES (13 @ .25) 3.25
9 TOTAL SYSTEM PRESSURE LOSS (PSI) 26.35
10 TOTAL PRESSURE SUPPLIED (PSI) 40.00
11 TOTAL PRESSURE SUPPLIED AT HOSE 818 (PSI) 13.65
NOTE:

INSTALL BACK FLOW PREVENTER WITH BOTTOM AT ELEVATION 309.0' OR HIGHER 4X4 WEATHER TREATED WOOD POST
i" HOSE BIB
INSTALL :!"VACUUM

BREAKER (TYP)
4X4 WEATHER TREATED WOOD POST
1f GALVANIZED

RISER (TYP)
i"HOSE BIB
INSTALL i" VACUUM

BREAKER (TYP)
1f SCH 40 PVC

LATERAL (TYP)

PIPE CLAMPS (TYP)
1 f GALVANIZED
RISER TYP n·-~
'.!(fr_~.:

PVC TO GALVANIZED

UNION (TYP)
18" PIPE CLAMPS (TYP)
I

2.0' MIN.
_J
;t" HOSE BIB RISER W/ rFi?.·O~rT::::
1t::sNO
SCALE: NTS
PW File Na I
Proj. ID. P 00 4
Fund
Or . 179901
DEVELOPMENT Ci::PARTivlENT
8 /\CK cL•rr-K,-D ,"-\ 1~ ,:=v .. C
DATE ________ _
ST·R.

BUILDING_ UCTURA-l. 0. -frt.-,'.------
/7) ~ M:=CHANICAL -!-------

ELECTRICAL
Pl UM BING ~9)c__ ___ _
P~OJECT DEYc.L _____ _
GRADING _______ _
PLANNING/ZOl-ill•:G !
Department of Public Works

SCALE JN FEET
,I, l 1
Ref. & Rev.

CITY OF FRESNO

CONSTRUCTION OF

COMMUNITY GARDENS
2021 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE
evie~ed ~
Project Engineer~.._:: /: .1 I

IRRIGATION LAYOUT
RWM Sheet No._~4~- !Dr. By:_==~ of 4 Sheets
ICh. By:'=-~~= 1Date: 7/14/09
l Scale: AB Noted X-E-XX
Downtown Education & Charter Schools
Action Plan
Background
The City is currently working with Aspire Public Schools and Envision Schools to assist them in opening new charter schools to be located on the City's Peach Avenue Complex and possibly multiple locations in the downtown area. Our objective is to assist these charter management organizations (CMO) in the development of high quality, well-run public charters schools to change the educational dynamics of Fresno and to provide new and innovative educational options to downtown residents, downtown employees and other area citizens.

Charter Management Organizations
Aspire Public Schools
Aspire schools are categorized as small schools and have a college-preparatory focus.

Elementary schools (grades K-5) are about 360 students; secondary schools (grades 6-12) are about 400 students. Increasingly many of the new charter schools are being started by "charter management organizations" (CMO's): organizations that establish and run multiple schools. Aspire is widely considered the leading not-for-profit CMO.

Envision Schools
Envision Schools began operations with full-time staff in June 2002. Co-founded by a former Vice President of the Bank of America and an award-winning teacher and nationally recognized school reform leader, Envision has demonstrated the capacity to launch high-performing public high schools that prepare students for college success and democratic citizenship in the 21st Century.

Between both CMO's, there will be 4 new charters schools opened by fall of 2008. By Fall of 2007, Aspire will open its first K-8 school at the Peach Avenue complex. In Fall of2008 Envision will open two 9-12 high school campuses, one at the Peach Avenue Complex and another at a site to be determined downtown. In Fall of 2008, Aspire will open its second K-8'school in the downtown area. The intent by each organization is to open a total of 5 to 10 new schools apiece in the Fresno area.

Strategy/ Tactics: Opening Peach Avenue & Downtown
Charter Schools
Critical Dates
• End of September 2006 - Submit charter petition to FUSD / FCOE • January 2007 - Appointed principal working with community groups on community outreach & recruitment
Land Preparation - Steps necessary for land to be ready for construction of new schools.

Land / Charter Schools
• Hire Henderson Architects Consultants to complete conceptual plan for the entire 50 acres by August 11 th
• Attain stock building layout plans from Aspire and Envision by August 11 th Re-designation of Land Use for Education Purposes o of 10 Acres • Len Simon communication with GSA and other federal government agencies to expedite process
• Final hand-over of deed completed by
• Request Public Benefit Process application from the US Department of Education
• Submit application to the US Department of Education
Facilities
• Conditional Use Permit
• Infrastructure build out
Financing Plan
• CMO Pursuit of State bond money
• Pursuit of private placement bond
• Pursue opportunity of working with district
Charter Management Organization's Critical Path Map - Necessary steps taken by the CMO with assistance by the City
• Orientation meeting with FUSD Superintendent
• Submit charter petition
• Early planning grant applications
• Community outreach efforts
• Charter petition preparation
• Community I parent meetings
• Petition review by charter authorizing organization
• Appeal to county for charter authorization if necessary • Filing of Prop 39 request
• Staff recruitment
• Staff development
• Student recruitment / enrollment
• Open School

City of

FRESNO REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
May 9, 2006
FROM: RANDY COOPER, Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services
THROUGH: DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager
Secretary, Historic Preservation Commission
BY: KARANA HATTERSLEY-DRAYTON
Historic Preservation Project Manager
AGENDA ITEM NO.

COUNCIL MEETING 05/9/06

APPROVED BY

CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER DESIGNATION OF THE PEACH AVENUE USDA HORTICULTURAL FIELD STATION HISTORIC DISTRICT LOCATED AT 2021 SOUTH PEACH AVENUE TO THE LOCAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC RESOURCES.

KEY RESULT AREA
One Fresno

RECOMMENDATION
The Historic Preservation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution placing the Peach Avenue USDA Horticultural Field Station on the Local Register of Historic Resources as a Historic District.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Department of Parks, Recreation and Community Services (PRCS) supports nomination of the former USDA Horticultural Field Station as a historic district to Fresno's Local Register of Historic Resources. PRCS intends to adaptively reuse the five buildings within the district boundaries for museum and park facilities and plant up to two acres of fallow land as a demonstration garden. Historic status allows use of the California Historic Building Code for rehabilitation and completes the City's obligation to the federal government regarding official transfer of the deed. This status specifically applies to the aforementioned buildings and acres. The remaining buildings and acres in the 20 acres above the tracks, as well as the 30 acres below the railroad tracks are not considered part of the historic district. The City of Fresno's Historic Preservation Commission held a noticed public hearing on March 13, 2006 regarding nomination of the historic district and concluded that it was eligible to the Register under Criteria i and ii. The Historic Preservation Commission hereby forwards this nomination to the City Council for consideration.

KEY OBJECTIVE BALANCE
Council action on historic preservation applications positively addresses the three Key Objectives of Customer Satisfaction, Financial Management and Employee Satisfaction. Customer service is the number one priority of the Historic Preservation Program and includes both external and internal customers. In the case of nominations to the Local Register, staff responds to applications from external customers, property owners, to have homes, commercial buildings or districts designated as historic properties as provided for through the Fresno Municipal Code and the City's 2025 General Plan.

Historic Preservation funding is derived almost exclusively from federal funds which are specifically designated for the purpose. Employee satisfaction is derived from working with our customers, the citizens of Fresno, to help protect the City's historic resources and preserve and enhance neighborhoods.

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Nomination of the USDA Horticultural Field Station to the Local Register May 9, 2006
Page2

BACKGROUND
The former USDA Horticultural Field Station is located on approximately 50 acres at 2021 South Peach Avenue in Southeast Fresno. From 1916 to 2000 the Station played a pivotal role in the development of fruit varieties and research in fruit genetics, post harvest transport and entomology that contributed to the development and advancement of agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley as well as throughout California and the United States. By 1936 a core campus of five buildings was on the northern original 20 acres of the parcel including a residence for the Station's director, a pump house, a genetics laboratory, market quality unit and greenhouse. All buildings were designed with Spanish Revival detailing. Over the next 45 years the original buildings were altered and added to and new as well as "temporary" buildings were constructed. In the year 2000 the USDA Field Station was moved to Parlier and the South Peach facility was closed. The 50 acres were determined surplus and the federal government began a process of divestment. The City of Fresno through PRCS applied to the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Parks Service (NPS) for the property, with the hope of using the parcel for sorely needed recreational facilities and open space. The joint application was sent to General Services Administration (GSA) and approved. On April 14, 2005, NPS notified the Parks Director that the City's application would be granted.

The transfer of federal property qualified as a "federal undertaking" as defined under federal law (36 CFR Part 800.16(y). Therefore the National Park Service, serving as the lead agency for the transfer process, was required to evaluate the affects of this transfer on any potential historic properties. NPS of course passed the work on to the city and PRCS who hired a consulting firm to prepare the analysis. What is required for a federal undertaking is to evaluate whether or not there are any •historic properties• as defined by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; thus are there resources eligible to the National Register?
Prior to the City of Fresno receiving the USDA Horticultural Field Station property, an environmental historical report was done. This report was authorized by the USDA. Applied Earthworks was the company that completed that report, which clearly established the existence of several potentially historic buildings. The City of Fresno was obligated under the terms of the property transfer to do a comprehensive and complete environmental historical evaluation of the property. Applied Earthworks was again identified to do this work because their experience and previous involvement with this property gave them the ability to expedite a report/evaluation.

Applied Earthworks November 2005 report concluded that the entire 20 acres, north of California Ave. (railroad tracks) should be considered an historical asset and eligible as a National Register district. We, the City of Fresno, disagreed and proposed that only the 5 oldest buildings, greenhouse, landscaping, -infrastructure and 2 acres of farmland be identified as historic assets. The acres and buildings not included would not be considered historic. Specifically, the bottom 30 acres, south of the railroad tracks, would not be considered a historic asset or the balance of the land or buildings not identified above the railroad tracks.

At the January 23, 2006 public hearing the Historic Preservation Commission on a 5-0 vote supported the staff position that the former Field Station was eligible to the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A and B with a period of significance of 1916-2000. The Commission also supported the staff recommendation for a smaller redrawn district boundary that includes the core campus that dates to 1936.

The district thus includes the five oldest buildings and their additions (Buildings 9, 10, 11, 12 and 18), landscaping and infrastructure and up to 2 acres of fallow land, which will remain in garden or agricultural use.
.. •

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Nomination of the USDA Horticultural Field Station to the Local Register May 9, 2006
Page3
The greenhouses at the western edge of the field (Buildings 31) should be retained if they are structurally sound, as they are on axis with Building 1 O and contribute to the visual integrity of this portion of the site.

The 1980s constructed Building 15 is a non-contributor to the District but this and any other structurally viable building on the full 20- acre site should be retained if they can be adaptively reused by the City . .

The staff and commission recommendations were forwarded to the SHPO along with the Applied Earthworks report in a letter dated February 2, 2006. Copies of this letter and the report were also sent to the National Park Service in San Francisco. In a letter dated February 27, 2006 and received by the Department on March 9, the SHPO did not concur with either the consultants' findings or the Commission's revised district boundaries and did not agree that any part of the site was eligible as a district for the National Register. In a May 22, 2006 letter Jane Lehman, the Regional Historic Preservation Office for the U.S. General Services Administration, also concurred with the SHPO findings regarding National Register eligibility of the property, but noted the importance of the site and that "a determination of non-eligibility for the HRHP does not preclude a property from being listed on a local historical register."
Regardless of whether the site is a National Register property or not, it is the consensus of Planning and PRCS staff, the Historic Preservation Commission and NPS staff that the former USDA Field Station has great historic significance and should be preserved and adaptively reused as a district under Fresno's Local Register of Historic Resources. The placement on the Register ensures not only the use of the California Historic Building Code but also the City's environmental obligations under federal and state laws, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Fresno has had a Local Register of Historic Resources for 27 years. Of the 250 or so individual properties on the Register only 27 of these are also on the National Register. Local Registers are set up to help preserve and celebrate local resources, not all of which meet the very high threshold for the National Register.

Attachments Exhibit A - Designation Criteria for Local Historic Districts.

Exhibit B - District Record and Revised District Map.

Exhibit C - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Fresno, California, Designating the Peach Avenue USDA Horticultural Field Station Historic District to the Local Register of Historic Resources.
pt1u
f'H\v
Or\ Af!.Lc ~ - ~Fie.f::-

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
f A vL- i,ool - -re, ~J
Downtown Education & Charter Schools
Agenda
August 31, 2006
l:r
/ I 1· . \'""P . CUP App 1catlon Steps
· Operational Statement ,,-
0 Conceptual Plan ~
~~\P
II. Alternate Location of Charter School Footprint
III. Temporary Site Process -
0 Portables Buildings - l O vl., J l ~ ~( ~ - • Alternative Location for Charter Schools (South Side) IV. Movement Forward
• .. - - • .. - - 1'111::'. I I ~I I .:::::: I ,'
,,
11 !1
'I I,
ii
!I I•
11 ,,
Ii
lj
!,
I' ,I
11 ii
II
•I
ll ,,
" !!
'! !;
if
!!
!j
!,
11 ,1 ,:
1!
ii
,.
ii
I'
11 ji
11 ii
II ,,
,I
!I
t' .j :,
(.
;i
" l!
;,
11 II
11 ,:
li
'1
h
r
1!
,_
..

CL
0 a.

C
..
" "'
'O
<
l-1 -P- r11vbttc-- F1rt1 r,
SHADED

DEDICATED

AREA INDICATES

FOR CHARTER
10 AOOE

SCHOOLS
PARCEL • vvv~' • d ~. _, /,,J../ ~ .; I - IN ANO OUT ...-J,. .- ./ , :

SITE ACCESS f VVV"" .;
----------- S O U t h P e a C h A V e n U e ----------- I ~ • !GREEN SPACE)

PICNIC PAVILIONS, SPLASH PARK,
TOT LOTS, ETC.

I
~d wlii ~"' i!: -:.;!
ii 1-~
0~ w
>-
:~
a.

ADULT SOCCER
'd
SCHOOL
---,1
j
i

ADULT SOCCER
k, ~ .. , .. 1 1~ r-
~-h::r1 7.1 • 11 I I I I I I L_J
kH-, f~';f fµ;t~· I
•
\',1A ~ I
y-/\~ ,,1, ~

HENERSON ARCHITECTURAL GROUP
TO LAYOUT.
.,
..

CD
CL
0 a. -
"'
C
..
'O
.,
.,
a:

C
..
" "' ·-'O
<
= • 1 1t-i ll11l111 l 11111
~ ~~~..-Ill
Ill •II.at lu
! I
- z:,\ ""'""
1 \ ., I i! I ~ ' <
1 ,f
·!!
~u \ l,S(3
~I 'o-5§ ~ :a-..,,. &§.fit
~
is
~-!! g<I)~
., 2lli ~-QJ
~Lt~
: =1 ~~~ 0 ~ o UNI.I..

CONCESSlONS-+-- - --- - -

TOILETS

STORAGE
Adjacent Property
SOUTH 3O-ACRE PARCEL
:/
',/ 1
J
NORTH 2O-ACRE PARCEL ~ 71
•1111, ,
,in Uni
0 r
--... , !••·····
lriltilhHI II
••JtiTTtilu
!11----f--,-\/pt - ,- ....,..,......------=--_--------,---RE_V_IS_E_D _C_O_NC_E_P-TU_A_L_S_IT_E_P-LA_N_T_O_ RE_F_LE_C_T_T_HE _ - IT_Y_O_F_F-RE_S_N_O_'S-F-LO_W_ D_IR-EC_T_IO-N---1. i• .. A~~.O 1 .~J.J.Vr w w,,c,u ,_, ~A..JL_..; ~v~~ #1 ~-fuL-/ -r~5lt~ Z?? ~,.
1· 1'
\ ~'\
•---== South Peach
- ~
IC? 1-1Sdloll I I ~
---wltl-P-.,s,IOIIIP,n, Totl.oll,&t.
- ~1. ...J L. a,.,~--- Q)
a.
0 ...
a..
~c~o~
,~~I
c«porr-t ~
~ ' -~
if\
r~ t
i
~t
3\
,~
+J •I ~ ~ ~ J I JTTTu 1111111 u 1111111 u 1111111 u 111111 1~ ~ I I~ C ~ ! ~ I : ~ ~:::::~lllllf:•~IIIIWW Q)
u
0 I -~ t-12Sdloll
-u
< I ,- -,
- -
AcUIS-Flold AcUIS-Flold
I I
I
SOUTH 30-ACREPARCEL

HENDERSON ARCHITECTIJRAL GROUP

CITY OF FRESNO PEACH AVENUE COMPLEX
,p
I I
A
:i\~
0 ......... NORTH 20-AC[E PARCEL r\8,5 ACRE_S NE_T
DYSON KARBY SIEGRIST JAN2!EN ARCHITECTS
~ c-- J)
r ~~ -;, ,.-:'\
:~
~.
--.J\_'t ~\-=3 ~~ ,, ~ . \_~ ~
G 1
-
..
~
f.
~
~\\
PROPOSED CONCEPTUAl SITE PLANS C
,_
-~t u
I
!
I
l
I
~'OUNJ:I . IIIIIAYlpltd
~ IIIIIAY IPNd - OIIIIJ:I IO Aw.)
, ..... IZL£8 -,uolP:) 'outeJ:1
INJi(; OUIIJ:I ~
OUIIJ:I IO Aw.)
. ....
••tiJedoJd 111iuep11•1:1 1ueo1(py

I -----------------------------------, '
-
• f
• 1
I
. f
I
I
J
J .c
0 • - - •
D.

I
I
1 I
I
I
%
,..
a.
0 a..
-C
•
u
•
"0
C
C
a,
a:

CJ)
en -
"0
CJ)
u,
0 a.
0 ...

I
r
t
!
r
L
CD
=
C
I CD
>
<.
.c
u
a,
CD

0..

I .C
-
=
0 en
8'001~ 'OUStJ:1
IIUAV 11088d
AµedoJd 8C118AV 1Pt8d · OUltJ:1 JO il0
~LC6 ~~ 'OUS8J:1
l88JlS OUS8J:1 ooei
OIIS8J:1 JO il0
1111 0
se11 J ed0Jd 1e 11u ep1se1::1 iue:,e f py
E>NIC71nB O31::1/S>ll::IVd
.........

I
I
/
/
I
I
I
I
\ < en I ...J :X:: I Q. CC
\ g. 0 l -- __ __ / ·
II
~ ! q i ~ i I 0 l I ! -= < . = I
-
< loi Q)
E § ,: Q)
.c
0 (f)
-
C
cu
a.

Q)
Cl) -
-a;
:::,
-a.

Q)
0 C
0 ' (.)
>,
-..

CD
Q.
0 ..

0..
-
C
CD
u
<Q
'O
<.
,...__ _ ,,__.,.,. .~.,.....,.• ________ .. ---~--.,..._...,,,•......_ , ....,.. __ ... ________ .. ___ ,.. ______________ . ..,._ __ .... __ ._..._ • .,._111._~°"'---...""-•_,.......,_., .,. __ • __ ,. ______ .., ._.,.........,..._.,.,.,._.,,._.,_~_,__,..M.....,,_...,___,~-_,,_-- .,IJ.a ____ ~---- ~-----·- ~----- - •-----o .. · _..._..._ - - ·--·,,.,. .... o _ ~ ,_,..._ __ ... ___ ~_..,__, _____ .,.. ______ p.,.. ____ .,,._. ____ .... _______ ,...., __ ,. ___ ....,.,_, __________________ ,. __ ,... ____ • ___ ,., ...... ___ .......,_..,._,,..,,.. __ ..........__ .-..... _p __ .... ~_ .. ___ .._ __ ,,,,___..........,_,.. ___ ..__o, _______ " ______ ..., ___ .......__._.,...._._""'-..,.,,c..-.... l'OT-.------.......... -----·----......,,.------·--· >
C.
-· I II)
()
(I)
::::,
- I I
"tJ
... I
0 "C
CD
...
'< -
!
I
C')
0 ::::,
(")
(I)
"'C
-
C:
e?..
~
-(I)
'"tJ
D>°
::::,
-
en
(")
i
(I) i 10 1
CD
-- -
> : . i ·11 . - - . I ~ :- : J
.1g d I; I
,...
ft:·, ' . [0 I ~. .. , . . 1~ ~-.r .. •• I I
' • t • ~-. - • =,;'
~\.-'~~--,:,-
..
' , .
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
' '
-
~
,,---·----Sr , - '
:E~'
' '-, --
o- \ :JJ :JJ I
""tJ I (n r- I
::z::> I
0 z , .,, rn :
'
Adjacent Property
_..,.
' ' ·, ), ~~=·~.' ' .. ,::->: ._::.·~· .,~,..... ; .nii~, ·-;•· ' ·. ~ \:-: ' •• ~; ~ ... \ .• \. •.·,_· •;,.,.;__.. ti 1~•.f " ~\, ,,~ ~ ... .•.,,:c·"'J :/~:·.--•. ' ~···· .• j': :· •;1 • 1·..,, ,,~ t 1 •· fl ,:~L ~tF-1' ;~ i l .J r. , • '\ I ,~-,.-r', I f 11 i\;:i.r, ,; l "•~ •, •,• .. .J.•,~1J"r 11;.&·µ.f '•1 I , , . ;I•. , .' • -·'.!.j••v -:!:.'.\-','1~5· ~~·~· ·.:. ~~ \.~\~ -'l - . ,.,

PARKS/REC BUILDING
- Adjacent Residential Properties
City of Fresno City of Fresno - Peach Avt111t Property
2800 Fresno Street
Fresno, CaDfomla 93721
Peach Avtlllt
Fresno, Calfoma
en
0 C
-:::7'
'"ti
CD
ID
()
:::7'
>
<
CD
:::,
C
CD
~Cf'§
~~ ~
~½u + :

Cl.,
:J
C
Cl.,
ID
~ c:::

Q)
JI!
~
~
Cl
c!!!
Q)
a.
..s::
.. 0JPO 'OUUJ.:1
81UAV l(l)88d
4'8doJd lnl8AV lpHd • OUteJ.:1 JO ii!O
l~LE8 l!W0l!flO 'OUS8J.:1
IH4S 0Ul8J.:1 ~~
0UHJ.:1 JO 0
s a + ..1 a d os..e l:11 J ft Cit Q J\.dU 131A I u;ecp !! s e l::I u la.I B 3J (f IP V :J9NICl1llll'IB l3WS>lt1Vd 9Nl>lt1Vd
ml>ltlVd ~1----o ai.--a
'
l
9Nl>lt1Vd
I
a..

I
.,::z--1--------------------+----------...... 3
C
C/'J
1Hrlo::D 1lV8.L3ltSV8
I
a.

I
I--
Cl.)
. !
- - -
II
-
al
(D
E
(D
..c
(.)
Cl)
-
C:
~
a:
(D
en -
«i
::,
-a.
(D
(.)
C:
0 (.)
•-~~•.,,,,_..,..._._._,_ _ _. ___ ......,_. ___________ ...,. _____ ,&,a._.1,_~ _____ ..,.,. ______ . __ ,....,_..,..._._~~,.C,,_.._,.IGU,_.--lll~-----------?--.. ...,._-O._~IG-...a ONII • ..._.._..._._'.-..a._Ml ____ ... .,..._.....,.... ___ ..,-..,o.,..~--...,.,.~.,,.,.,..,,._......,. ,4111.....alr.9._,,.~~.1,--•GIM.~ '~~'lllM.11<._..~.0.t..1. ____ ,..a ___ •~.,..~--o._. ,..,__~_...-■- •.., ••-•'"'"'"' •

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Downtown Education & Charter Schools
Acenda
October 10, 2006
I. Conceptual and Master Plan Development
0 Art Dyson - Master Plan 0 Conceptual Plan Drawing
II. PRCS Department Site Plan Projects
0 Zinkin Family Recreation/Nutrition/Sports Facility 0 Conservation Corp State Museum 0 Discovery- Center III. Charter Schools Update
• Land Re-designation 0 Milestones
• Aspire Site Visit (Stockton)

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Downtown Education & Charter Schools
Agenda
October 5, 2006
I. Upcoming Meeting with Mayor's Office & City Manager's Office II. Peach Property Update
Master Plan & Conceptual Plan Update
US General Services Administration - Land Re-designation III. CUP Application & Traffic Study
Funding for Traffic Study
Operational Statements
IV. Charter Schools Update
Financing of School Buildings - 0 Portables on site 0 Number of Portables & Costs Associated V. Path Forward
Sophia Pagoulatos. - Re: Fwd: Peach Ave Park & Charter School From:

To:

Date:

Subject:

John:

Sophia Pagoulatos
John Madrid
8/24/2006 11 :27:44 AM
Re: Fwd: Peach Ave Park & Charter School
I also committed to providing you with supplemental information, i.e. information to be provided in addition to the site plans and elevations, that we need to process the CUP. Here's a list:

1. Operational Statement: this is a narrative document that explains the operations of a use. For example, for the charter schools, we would need# of Students,# of staff, hours of operation, grades served, # of classrooms, # of seats or square footage of any large auditoriums, whether or not the schools would provide their own bus transport; need for bus circulation, # of deliveries of food or supplies, use of outdoor facilities, etc. For the recreational facilities on the site, hours of operation, whether or not the facility would have night lighting, maximum capacity(# of people), etc. Also would need this for the uses on the northern portion of the site. Basically anything that relates to the use.

2. Supplemental studies: In this case, we will need at a minimum the following:
a. Traffic Impact Study-this is typically contracted out. There are several traffic engineering firms in the area; you need to get this going asap as they take 60-120 days. b. Phase I (and Phase II} Site Assessments for site contamination. These are also contracted out and take time. Need to get this underway if it hasn't been done already. I think Parks mentioned that this has already been done. If so, we will need copies with the application. c. Cultural Resource Surveys - this would be necessary for the northern portion of the site. Maybe this has already been done? Contact Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Cultural Resource Project Manager at x8520.

Let me know if you have any questions--
Sophia Pagoulatos
City of Fresno
Planning & Development Department
Supervising Planner
(559) 621-8062
>>> John Madrid 8/24/2006 10:39 AM >»
Sophia,
I've been out sick for a few days and am catching up on some old emails. Thanks again for the information below and I did receive the CUP application. jm
>>> Sophia Pagoulatos 08/15/06 1 :59 PM >»
John- ·
The planning department has already determined that the zoning on the property is appropriate, and the only planning entitlement needed is a conditional use permit. In order to begin our review of the permit, a conditional use permit application needs to be submitted to our department on our standard form, which I will send you via interoffice mail (unfortunately it is not yet electronic). The form comes with instructions for the submittal of the application, and I will be happy to meet with you and discuss. The most important components of the application are the operational statement (in which the project is described in detail)

Page 1 ends

Fresno City CouncilOctober 10, 2024

Fresno City Council
October 10, 2024