CITY OF FRESNO
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN IS DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY
EXEMPT FROM THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 19 OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES.
APPLICANT: City of Fresno
Capital Projects Department
747 R Street, Fresno, CA 93721
PROJECT LOCATION: Vinland Park, located at 4695 E Gettysburg Avenue, Fresno (Council District 4)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project includes expansio n of the park with active and passive recreational opportunities and enhances amenities including, but not limited to, a futsal cour t, four (4) pickleball courts, ADA walkways, a plaza space with shade structure, benches, and picnic tables, two (2) drinking fountains, nine (9) light poles, removal of seven non-native trees and planting new trees around the new courts.
This project is exempt under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State of California CEQA Guidelines. None of the exceptions to Categorical Exem ptions set forth in the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 apply to this project.
EXPLANATION:
Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines exempts the activity that is covered by common sense exemption that CEQA applies to projects which hav e the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.
The project would be located on approximately 33,800 square-foot (0.78 acre) area to the north of the existing tennis courts. The proposed construction includes, but not limited to, a futsal court, four (4) pickleball courts, ADA walkways, a plaza space with shade structure, benches, picnic tables, two (2) drinking fountains, nine (9) light poles, removal of seven non-native trees and planting new trees around the new courts. T he project will develop new sports courts and amenities as an addition to an existing park. The disturbance area is within the boundaries of the existing park and will be contiguous to the existing sport courts.
Based on the analysis provided in below attachments, the lead agency, with certainty, can state there is no possibi lity that the Project activities would have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore the Project is not subject to CEQA under Section 15061 (b)(3).
None of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptio ns set forth in the CEQA guidelines Section 15300.2 apply to this pr oject. Furthermore, the proposed pr oject is not expected to have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a categorical exemption, as noted above, has been prepared for the project.
No adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of the proposed project.
Date: October 07, 2024
Prepared By: Harlavpreet Brar
Licensed Professional Engineer
Submitted By: Harlavpreet S. Brar
City of Fresno
Capital Projects Department
(559) 621-8616
Attachments:
Attachment A – Description and Analysis
Attachment B – California Emissions Estimator Model
Attachment C – Cultural Resources Technical Memo
Attachment D – Landscape Ordinance Calculations
Attachment A
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
Vinland Park is located at 4695 E Gettysburg Avenue, Fresno (APN 430-020-19T). It encompasses
7.88-acres and offers open green space, a baseball/softball field, a soccer field, tennis courts, and a splash pad.
The proposed Project would include the removal of ex isting trees, and the devel opment of a futsal court; four pickleball courts; ADA-compliant walkways; a plaza with shade structures, benches, and picnic tables; two drinking fountains; new sports court lighting; and landscaping with associated irrigation systems. The purpose of the Project is to provide long-term recreational enhancements and improvements to the existing pub lic park that will benefit existing and future residents, property owners, and visitors.
The Project would be located within the boundaries of the existing park, north of the tennis courts. The area is undeveloped, with grass and scattered non-native trees. The area surrounding the Project site is predominantly developed with resi dential uses to the north, east and south. Vinland Elementary School is located immediately adjacent to the west.
Construction of the proposed Project is anticipat ed to begin in February 2025. Construction would occur over the course of 65 working days. The on-site construction workforce would consist of up to 10 individuals; however, the average daily workfo rce would vary depending upon the stage in construction.
There is no right-of-way or other land acquisition required for the proposed work. Minimal excavation and directional boring will occur; trenching for irrigation and potable water lines would be approximately 4 feet in depth and boring for sports court lighting would be approximately six feet in depth. The majority of the remaining proposed improvements will occur at grade.
Reasons why project is exempt:
The Project includes the upgrade to existing public facilities, involves a minor expansion of the existing use and the construction of limited numbers of new, small components or st ructures. The City of Fresno (City, lead agency) intends to upgrade existing ADA paths of travel to make them more accessible, replace the existing landscaping and associated irrigation system, and construct a limited number of new amenities, including sports courts, a plaza with shade structures, benches, and picnic tables, and drinking fountains.
Based on the analysis provided below, the lead agency, with certainty, can state there is no possibility that the Project activities would have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore the Project is not subject to CEQA under Section 15061 (b)(3).
Aesthetics
The Project site is located in a developed area of the City and is not located in an area with expansive or an important viewshed. The Project site is not located within any of the scenic vista points identified in the General Plan and construction of the Project would not significantly affect or block a potentially scenic vista in the City.
Fresno County has three eligible State Scenic Highways; the neares t eligible highways include a portion of State Route (SR) 180, located approximately 7 miles east of the City, and a portion of SR 168, located approximately 5 miles east of City. Im plementation of the propo sed Project would not damage scenic resources within a designated state scenic highway.
The Project site is currently developed as a public park. The design of the Project is consistent and compatible with the visual character of the Project site and vicinity.
The Project site is located in an urbanized area subject to preexisting exterior lighting from surrounding developments and existing street light ing. The proposed Project would introduce new sources of light and glare to the area in the form of sports cour t lighting. However, new sources of light and glare associated with the Project would not be significant in the context of existing lighting sources in the Project vicinity. In addition, dayti me glare would not be significant because no highly reflective glass elements are proposed as part of the Project. Compliance wi th California Building Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) and Fresno Municipal Code lighting standards would address light and glare impacts to day- and night-time views resulting from construction of the proposed Project.
Air Quality
Construction and operational emissions for t he proposed Project, including greenhouse gas emissions, were analyzed using the California Emissions Estimator Mode l (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0. Model results for construction and operational emissions are shown in Attachment B. The results shown in Tables 1 and 2, indicate that the proposed Proj ect’s construction and operational emissions are exceedingly small and would not exceed SJVAPCD criteria pollutant thresholds for CO, NOx, ROG, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5. Nor would it result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment.
Table 1: Project Construction Emissions (TPY) – Vinland Park
Project Construction CO NOx ROG SOx PM10 PM2.5
2025 Construction Emissions* 0.27 0.21 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.01 SJVAPCD Thresholds 100.0 10.0 10.0 27.0 15.0 15.0 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: Appendix B
*Emission units = Tons per Year (tpy)
CO = carbon monoxide; NOX = nitrogen oxides; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size; ROG = reactive organic gas; SOX = sulfur oxides
SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Table 2: Project Operational Emissions (TPY) – Vinland Park
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Total Project Operational
Emissions* 0.003 0.000 0.004 0.000 0.001 0.000
SJVAPCD Significance Threshold 10.0 10.0 100.0 27.0 15.0 15.0 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: Appendix B
Note: 0.000 may represent <0.0005
*Emission units = Tons per Year (tpy) CO = carbon monoxide NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size
PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size ROG = reactive organic gas SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SOX = sulfur oxides
Therefore, the proposed Pr oject would not conflict with or obstr uct implementation of SJVAPCD air quality plans, would not result in a cumulatively co nsiderable contribution to a net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment, and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollution concentrations.
Odors
During construction, the various diesel-powered vehicles and equipment in use on- site would create localized odors. These odors woul d be temporary and ar e not likely to be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the Proj ect site. Additionally, the pr oposed Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people during project construction or operation.
Biological Resources
The Project site is located in an urbanized area and is currently developed as a public park. Due to the urban location, the Project site d oes not provide suitable habitat for special-st atus animal species.
Common wildlife species that are adapted to urban environments are expected to continue to use the site and vicinity after redevelopment. The Project si te is not located within riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community, does not contain any aquatic resources, and is not a suitable migratory wildlife corridor. The Project proposes the removal of four Chinese Elm trees and three Pinus spp. trees (approximately 24” trunk), as well as 28,220 square feet of turf. The trees to be removed have been severely pruned by the local utility companies to keep them from encroaching on the nearby power lines. These trees are not considered to have any biological signifcance and are not native or
heritage trees. The trees will be replaced with ten Chinese Pistache trees (24” box) and 14,796 square feet of turf. Construction will take place outside of the nesting season of February through August for avian species protected under Fish and Game Code 3500 and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA).
If, for unforeseen reasons, construction cannot avoid the nesting season, a pre-construction clearance survey will be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any nesting birds or nesting activity is observed on or within 500-feet of a Project site. Additionally, the following best management practices (BMP) will be implemented during construction:
a. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers and removed at least once a week from the construction or Project site.
b. Construction-related vehicle traffic shall be restricted to established roads and predetermined ingress and egress corridors, staging, and parking areas. Vehicle speeds shall not exceed 20 miles per hour (mph) within the Project site.
c. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project site during construction.
With implementation of a precon struction survey (if warranted) and these BMP, impacts would be less than significant.
Cultural and Tribal Resources
The Table Mountain Rancheria Tr ibe and the Dumna Wo Wah Tribe have requested to be notified pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52). A certified letter was mailed to the above-mentioned tribes on July 31, 2024. Neither tribe requested consultation as of this date.
As discussed in the Cultural Resources technical memo, (Attachment C), a Sacred Lands File request was also submitted to the Native American Heritage Commission. A response dated August 1, 2024, indicates negative results. No archaeological or historical resources were identified within the Project site. As required by the California Health and Safety Code and Public Resources Code, the construction crew will abide by all appliable regulations pertaining to cultural and historic resources during all construction activities.
Hydrology, Water Availability and Water Quality
The total ground disturbance area on the Project site is 0.99 acres. As such, the proposed Project does not include the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). However, the proposed Project will comply with California Building Code CALGreen (Title 24, part II; Section 5.106) and BMPs. BMP features are designe d to eliminate contact of rain fall and stormwater runoff with sources of pollution that occur on construction sites, the main source being soil erosion resulting from unstabilized soils coming in contact with water and wind.
Long-term operational impacts associated with the proposed Project would be considered less than significant with the implementat ion of the City’s Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan (SDFCMP), which manages the City’s stormwater drainage systems, and the Cit y’s participation in the Phase 1 NPDES Permit for St ormwater Discharges From M unicipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (Phase 1 MS4), which requires the City to implement water quality and watershed protection measures for all development projects.
The City Department of Public Utilities (DPU) cu rrently supplies water to the Project site.
Development of the Project is anticipated to result in a dec rease in groundwater usage (see Attachment D). The Project includ es the replacement of seven tree s and 28,220 square feet of turf with 10 trees and 14,796 square feet of turf. The current water use for the existing landscaping of the Project area is 405,479 gallons per year and the anticipated wa ter demand for the Project is approximately 24,379 gallons per year. As such, development of the Project will result in a decrease in water demand by 381,100 gallons per year or a 94% decrease in water demand. Impacts of the Project are less than significant related to long term water usage.
Noise
Certain land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others. Exam ples of these include residential areas, educational facilities, hospitals, childcare facilities, and senior housing. The closest sensitive receptors to the Project site include Vinland Elementary School, located immediately west of the Project site, and the residential uses imm ediately north, east, and south of the Project site.
Vinland Elementary, is located appr oximately 350 feet west of t he construction area, the nearest single-family homes are located approximately 60 feet east, and the nearest multi-family residences are located approximately 15 feet north. As noted in Chapter 9, Noise and Safety, of the Fresno General Plan, “There are numerous park and school uses within the ci ty. Noise generated by these uses depends on the age and number of people utilizing the respective facility at a given time and the types of activities they are engaged in. School playing field activities tend to generate more noise than those of neighborhood parks, as the intensity of school playground usage tends to be higher. At a distance of 100 feet from an elementary school playground being used by 100 students, average and maximum noise levels of 60 and 75 dB, respec tively, can be expected. ” As such, there are existing ambient noise levels that are typically of these types of developments.
Short-Term (Construction) Noise Impacts
Project construction would result in short-term noise impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. Maximum construction noise would be short-term, generally intermittent depending on the construction phase, and variable depending on receiver distance from the active construction zone. The duration of noise impacts generally would be from one day to se veral days depending on the phase of construction.
Typical noise levels generated by individual piec es of construction equipment generally range from approximately 77 dBA to 90 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. Depending on the equipment required and duration of use, average-hourly noise levels associated with construction activity typically ranges from roughly 65 to 90 dBA Leq at 50 feet.
Chapter 10, Article 1 (Noise Regulations), of the Fresno Municipal Code establishes excessive noise guidelines and exemptions. Section 10-109 states that construction noise is exempted from City noise regulations provided such work takes place bet ween the hours of 7:00 a. m. and 10:00 p.m. on any day except Sunday. Thus, although development activities associated with the proposed Project could potentially result in a tem porary or periodic increas e in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity, construction activity would be exempt from City of Fresno noise regulations, as long as such activity is conducted pursuant to an applicable construction permit and occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., excluding S unday. Therefore, short -term construction impacts associated with the exposure of persons to or the gener ation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan or noise ordinance or applicable st andards of other agencies would be less than
significant.
Long-term Operational Impacts
Motor vehicles with their distinctive noise characteristics are the dominant noise source in the Project vicinity. The amount of noise varies according to many factors, such as volume of traffic, vehicle mix (percentage of cars and trucks) , average traffic speed, and distance from the observer.
Implementation of the proposed Project would result in new daily trips on local roadways in the Project site vicinity. A characteristic of sound is that a doubling of a noise source is required in order to result in a perceptible (3 dBA or greater) increase in the resulting noise level. The Project site is within a high-quality transit priority area, which is defi ned as “an area within one-half mile of a major transit stop that is existing or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Im provement Program.” As such, the proposed Project is within walking distance of a high-frequency Fresno Area Express (FAX) bus route. The Project would not result in a doubling of traffic volumes along any roadway segment in the Project vicinity and, therefore, would not result in a perceptible increase in traffic noise levels at receptors in the Project vicinity.
Development of the Project would increase activity at the existing parks. Development of the proposed Project would result in the avail ability of additional sports courts at the Project site. The Project proposes the development of one futsal court an d four pickleball courts at the Project site.
Development of the proposed Project would allow for ten futsal players and four pickleball players on each court at a time. It is speculative to anticipate a significant increase in activity at the Project site.
Based on the information presented above, the resulting noise impacts would be within the acceptable noise levels established in Tables 9-2 and 9-3 of the Noise and Safety Element of the General Plan.
Additionally, the Project site is located within 1.02 miles of Fresno Yosemite International Airport, 6.17 miles of Fresno Chandler Executiv e Airport, and 7.2 miles of the Sierra Sky Airport. Each of these airports are considered under the Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The ALUCP includes CNEL noise contours based on projected airport and aircraft operations. Although the Project site is within 2 miles of Fresno Yosemite International Airport, the Project site is located within the TPZ zone, it is outside of the 60 dB noise contour identified in the Fresno County ALUCP.
Traffic
The subject property is located northwest of the East Gettysburg Avenue and North Woodrow Avenue intersection. According to the General Plan Circulation Element, East Gettysburg Avenue is designated as a collector. Collectors are two- to four-lane undivided (opposing travel lanes generally not separated by a median island) roadways, with the primary function of connecting local streets and arterials and neighborhood traffic generators and prov iding access to abutting properties. North Woodrow Avenue is designated as a local street. The Project, once constructed, would not affect any circulation system, transit, roadways, or bicycle facilities. The proposed Project will improve existing internal pedestrian facilities at the park thr ough the construction of ADA-compliant walkways.
Pedestrian facilities along East Gettysburg Avenue and North Woodrow Avenue would remain unchanged.
Senate Bill (SB) 743 requires that relevant CEQA analysis of transportati on impacts be conducted using a metric known as vehicle miles traveled (VMT ). VMT measures how much actual auto travel
(additional miles driven) a propos ed project would create on Califo rnia roads. If the project adds excessive car travel onto our roads, the project may cause a significant transportation impact.
The State CEQA Guidelines were amended to implement SB 743, by adding Section 15064.3. Among its provisions, Section 15064.3 conf irms that, except with respect to transportation projects, a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact. Therefore, LOS measures of impacts on traffic facilities is no l onger a relevant CEQA criteria for transportation impacts.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3( b)(4) states that “[a] lead agency has discretion to evaluate a project’s VMT, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project’s VMT and may revise those estimates to reflect prof essional judgement based on substant ial evidence. Any assumptions used to estimate VMT and any revision to model outputs should be documented and explained in the environmental document prepared for the project. The standard of adequacy in Section 15151 shall apply to the analysis described in this section.”
On June 25, 2020, the City of Fresno adopted CEQA Guidelines for VMT Thresholds, pursuant to SB 743 to be effective as of July 1, 2020. The thresholds described therein are referred to herein as the City of Fresno VMT Thresholds. The City of Fres no VMT Thresholds document was prepared and adopted consistent with the require ments of CEQA Guidelines Se ctions 15064.3 and 15064.7. The December 2018 Technical Advisory on Evaluatin g Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Technical Advisory) published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (O PR), was utilized as a reference and guidance document in the preparation of the City of Fresno VMT Thresholds.
The City of Fresno VMT Thresholds adopted a screeni ng standard and criteria that can be used to screen out qualified projects that meet the adopted criteria from needing to prepare a detailed VMT analysis.
The City of Fresno VMT Thresholds Section 3.0 regarding Project Sc reening discusses a variety of projects that may be screened out of a VMT analysis includi ng specific development and transportation projects. For development projects, c onditions may exist that would presume that a development project has a less than significant impact, including:
The project is within 0.5 mile (mi) of a Transit Priority Area or a High -Quality Transit Area unless the project is inconsistent with the R egional Transportation Plan (RTP)/SCS, has a floor area ratio (FAR) less than 0.75, provides an excessive amount of parking, or reduces the number of affordable residential units.
The project involves local-serving reta il space of less than 50,000 square feet. The project has a high level of affordable housing units. The project generates a low volu me of daily traffic. The City will allow screening out projects if the project would generate less than 500 ADT.
The development of institut ional/government and public service uses that support community health, safety, and welfare.
In accordance with SB 743, “tra nsit priority areas” are defined as “an area within one - half mile of a major transit stop that is existi ng or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program.” The Project site is located
within a high-quality transit priority area. It is consistent with the 2022 Fresno COG RTP/SCS; floor area ratio (FAR) does not apply as no building is proposed. The Project is not altering the amount of parking and will not reduce the number of affordable residential units. As such, the Project screens out of a VMT analysis.
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - The courts and walkways will encompass 0.61 acres of the 0.99 acre project. The additional 0.38 acres was modeled as city park.
Construction Phase - Default Scheduled to fit anticipated 75 working days of construction Vehicle Trips - Default trips were increased to match the default trips for a 1 acre City park to represent a small increase of traffic the upgrade may bring.
Fleet Mix - Additional operational trips will come from personal automobiles and has therefore been limited to LDA, LDT1 and LDT2.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 26.56 1000sqft 0.61 26,560.00 0 City Park 0.38 Acre 0.38 16,552.80 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 45
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2025Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 3.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 66.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AMPage 1 of 27 Vinland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Vinland Park
Fresno County, Annual
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
5.00 3.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
7/9/2025
7/7/2025
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
6/25/2025
5/8/2025
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
7/2/2025
6/30/2025
tblFleetMix
HHD
0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix
LDA
0.52 0.33
tblFleetMix
LDT1
0.05 0.33
tblFleetMix
LDT2
0.18 0.33
tblFleetMix
LHD1
0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix
LHD2
6.6560e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
MCY
0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix
MDV
0.15 0.00
tblFleetMix
MH
2.8650e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
MHD
0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix
OBUS
7.0200e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
SBUS
1.4630e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
UBUS
2.8700e-004
0.00 tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.96 5.88
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
2.19 6.57
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
0.78 2.34
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2025
0.0278
0.2122
0.2683
5.0000e-
004
0.0122
8.8900e-
003
0.0211
4.3900e-
003
8.1900e-
003
0.0126
0.0000
44.5846
44.5846
0.0118
7.4000e-
004
45.1014
Maximum
0.0278
0.2122
0.2683
5.0000e-
004
0.0122
8.8900e-
003
0.0211
4.3900e-
003
8.1900e-
003
0.0126
0.0000
44.5846
44.5846
0.0118
7.4000e-
004
45.1014
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2025
0.0278
0.2122
0.2683
5.0000e-
004
8.8000e-
003
8.8900e-
003
0.0177
2.8100e-
003
8.1900e-
003
0.0110
0.0000
44.5846
44.5846
0.0118
7.4000e-
004
45.1014
Maximum
0.0278
0.2122
0.2683
5.0000e-
004
8.8000e-
003
8.8900e-
003
0.0177
2.8100e-
003
8.1900e-
003
0.0110
0.0000
44.5846
44.5846
0.0118
7.4000e-
004
45.1014
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
27.93 0.00
16.12 35.99
0.00 12.56
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 2-1-2025
4-30-2025
0.2053
0.2053
2 5-1-2025
7-31-2025
0.0372
0.0372
Highest
0.2053
0.2053
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
2.4500e-
003
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Energy
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mobile
3.7000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.7933
0.7933
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.8023
Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
6.0900e-
003
0.0000
6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1466
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Total
2.8200e-
003
2.8000e-
004
3.5700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.8000e-
004
6.0900e-
003
0.9404
0.9465
4.1000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.9660
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
2.4500e-
003
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Energy
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mobile
3.7000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.7933
0.7933
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.8023
Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
6.0900e-
003
0.0000
6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1466
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Total
2.8200e-
003
2.8000e-
004
3.5700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.8000e-
004
6.0900e-
003
0.9404
0.9465
4.1000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.9660
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
2/1/2025
2/3/2025
5 1
2 Grading
Grading
2/4/2025
2/5/2025
5 2
3 Building Construction
Building Construction
2/6/2025
5/8/2025
5 66
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
4 Paving
Paving
6/26/2025
6/30/2025
5 3
5 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
7/3/2025
7/7/2025
5 3
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
4 6.00
9 0.56
Building Construction
Cranes
1 4.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
2 6.00
89 0.20
Grading
Graders
1 6.00
187
0.41 Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 7.00
130
0.42 Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 6.00
247
0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 7.00
97 0.37
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 7.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
2 5.00
0.00 0.00
10.80 7.30
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,594 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.61
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.7000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
2.2000e-
004
2.4000e-
003
1.9100e-
003
0.0000
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4274
0.4274
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4309
Total
2.2000e-
004
2.4000e-
003
1.9100e-
003
0.0000
2.7000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
1.1000e-
004
0.0000
0.4274
0.4274
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4309
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Grading
3 8.00
0.00 0.00
10.80 7.30
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
5 18.00
7.00 0.00
10.80 7.30
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
7 18.00
0.00 0.00
10.80 7.30
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 4.00
0.00 0.00
10.80 7.30
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0147
0.0147
0.0000
0.0000
0.0148
Total
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0147
0.0147
0.0000
0.0000
0.0148
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
1.0000e-
004
0.0000
1.0000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
2.2000e-
004
2.4000e-
003
1.9100e-
003
0.0000
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4274
0.4274
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4309
Total
2.2000e-
004
2.4000e-
003
1.9100e-
003
0.0000
1.0000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
1.8000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.4274
0.4274
1.4000e-
004
0.0000
0.4309
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0147
0.0147
0.0000
0.0000
0.0148
Total
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0147
0.0147
0.0000
0.0000
0.0148
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Grading - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
5.3100e-
003
0.0000
5.3100e-
003
2.5700e-
003
0.0000
2.5700e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
8.3000e-
004
8.7300e-
003
5.3900e-
003
1.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
3.5000e-
004
3.2000e-
004
3.2000e-
004
0.0000
1.2380
1.2380
4.0000e-
004
0.0000
1.2480
Total
8.3000e-
004
8.7300e-
003
5.3900e-
003
1.0000e-
005
5.3100e-
003
3.5000e-
004
5.6600e-
003
2.5700e-
003
3.2000e-
004
2.8900e-
003
0.0000
1.2380
1.2380
4.0000e-
004
0.0000
1.2480
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Grading - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.6000e-
004
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0470
0.0470
0.0000
0.0000
0.0474
Total
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.6000e-
004
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0470
0.0470
0.0000
0.0000
0.0474
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
2.0700e-
003
0.0000
2.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
003
0.0000
1.0000e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
8.3000e-
004
8.7300e-
003
5.3900e-
003
1.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
3.5000e-
004
3.2000e-
004
3.2000e-
004
0.0000
1.2380
1.2380
4.0000e-
004
0.0000
1.2480
Total
8.3000e-
004
8.7300e-
003
5.3900e-
003
1.0000e-
005
2.0700e-
003
3.5000e-
004
2.4200e-
003
1.0000e-
003
3.2000e-
004
1.3200e-
003
0.0000
1.2380
1.2380
4.0000e-
004
0.0000
1.2480
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.3 Grading - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.6000e-
004
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0470
0.0470
0.0000
0.0000
0.0474
Total
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.6000e-
004
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0470
0.0470
0.0000
0.0000
0.0474
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0182
0.1809
0.2319
3.8000e-
004
7.9600e-
003
7.9600e-
003
7.3200e-
003
7.3200e-
003
0.0000
33.0976
33.0976
0.0107
0.0000
33.3652
Total
0.0182
0.1809
0.2319
3.8000e-
004
7.9600e-
003
7.9600e-
003
7.3200e-
003
7.3200e-
003
0.0000
33.0976
33.0976
0.0107
0.0000
33.3652
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
2.4000e-
004
0.0101
2.9100e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.5300e-
003
7.0000e-
005
1.6000e-
003
4.4000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
5.1000e-
004
0.0000
4.2830
4.2830
2.0000e-
005
6.4000e-
004
4.4756
Worker
1.5800e-
003
9.3000e-
004
0.0120
4.0000e-
005
4.7500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
1.2600e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.2800e-
003
0.0000
3.4899
3.4899
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
3.5200
Total
1.8200e-
003
0.0110
0.0149
8.0000e-
005
6.2800e-
003
9.0000e-
005
6.3700e-
003
1.7000e-
003
8.0000e-
005
1.7900e-
003
0.0000
7.7729
7.7729
1.1000e-
004
7.3000e-
004
7.9956
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0182
0.1809
0.2319
3.8000e-
004
7.9600e-
003
7.9600e-
003
7.3200e-
003
7.3200e-
003
0.0000
33.0976
33.0976
0.0107
0.0000
33.3652
Total
0.0182
0.1809
0.2319
3.8000e-
004
7.9600e-
003
7.9600e-
003
7.3200e-
003
7.3200e-
003
0.0000
33.0976
33.0976
0.0107
0.0000
33.3652
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
2.4000e-
004
0.0101
2.9100e-
003
4.0000e-
005
1.5300e-
003
7.0000e-
005
1.6000e-
003
4.4000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
5.1000e-
004
0.0000
4.2830
4.2830
2.0000e-
005
6.4000e-
004
4.4756
Worker
1.5800e-
003
9.3000e-
004
0.0120
4.0000e-
005
4.7500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
1.2600e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.2800e-
003
0.0000
3.4899
3.4899
9.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
005
3.5200
Total
1.8200e-
003
0.0110
0.0149
8.0000e-
005
6.2800e-
003
9.0000e-
005
6.3700e-
003
1.7000e-
003
8.0000e-
005
1.7900e-
003
0.0000
7.7729
7.7729
1.1000e-
004
7.3000e-
004
7.9956
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
8.5000e-
004
7.3800e-
003
0.0105
2.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
3.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4101
1.4101
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4204
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
8.5000e-
004
7.3800e-
003
0.0105
2.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
3.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4101
1.4101
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4204
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1586
0.1586
0.0000
0.0000
0.1600
Total
7.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1586
0.1586
0.0000
0.0000
0.1600
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
8.5000e-
004
7.3800e-
003
0.0105
2.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
3.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4101
1.4101
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4204
Paving
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
8.5000e-
004
7.3800e-
003
0.0105
2.0000e-
005
3.3000e-
004
3.3000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
3.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4101
1.4101
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.4204
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
7.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1586
0.1586
0.0000
0.0000
0.1600
Total
7.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
5.4000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
0.0000
2.2000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
6.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1586
0.1586
0.0000
0.0000
0.1600
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
5.5400e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
2.6000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
2.7100e-
003
0.0000
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3830
0.3830
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3835
Total
5.8000e-
003
1.7200e-
003
2.7100e-
003
0.0000
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3830
0.3830
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3835
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0353
0.0353
0.0000
0.0000
0.0356
Total
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0353
0.0353
0.0000
0.0000
0.0356
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
5.5400e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
2.6000e-
004
1.7200e-
003
2.7100e-
003
0.0000
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3830
0.3830
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3835
Total
5.8000e-
003
1.7200e-
003
2.7100e-
003
0.0000
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
8.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3830
0.3830
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.3835
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0353
0.0353
0.0000
0.0000
0.0356
Total
2.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
004
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
0.0000
5.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0353
0.0353
0.0000
0.0000
0.0356
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
3.7000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.7933
0.7933
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.8023
Unmitigated
3.7000e-
004
2.8000e-
004
3.3200e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0300e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0400e-
003
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.7933
0.7933
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
0.8023
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
City Park
0.89 2.23
2.50 2,799
2,799
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0.00 0.00
0.00 Total
0.89 2.23
2.50 2,799
2,799
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
City Park
9.50 7.30
7.30 33.00
48.00 19.00
66 28
6 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
9.50 7.30
7.30 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
City Park
0.334000
0.333000
0.333000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0.521458
0.053308
0.175656
0.151963
0.025001
0.006656
0.014407
0.022718
0.000702
0.000287
0.023515
0.001463
0.002865
5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
City Park
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
2.4500e-
003
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Unmitigated
2.4500e-
003
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
5.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.8700e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Total
2.4400e-
003
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
5.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
1.8700e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Total
2.4400e-
003
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.8000e-
004
4.8000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000
5.1000e-
004
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Unmitigated
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
City Park
0 /
0.452763
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
City Park
0 /
0.452763
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.1466
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.1481
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Unmitigated
6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
City Park
0.03 6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
City Park
0.03 6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Other Non-
Asphalt Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
6.0900e-
003
3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0151
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 8/9/2024 7:44 AM
Vineland Park - Fresno County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied
ATTACHMENT C –
CULTURAL RESOURCES
TECHNICAL MEMO
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Date: August 16, 2024
Project: Cultural resources records search – Vinland Park Futsal and Pickleball Courts Project
To: Jaymie Brauer, Principal Planner
From: Robert Parr, MS, RPA, Senior Archaeologist
Subject: Cultural Resources Records Search Results (RS#24-356)
Background
A cultural resources records search (#24-356) was conducted at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center at California State University, Bakersfield for the Vinland Park Futsal and Pickleball Courts Project (Project) located in the city of Fresno, Fresno County , California. The purpose of the search was to determine whether any known cultural resources were located on or near the proposed project that might be impacted by project construction and/or activities.
Project Location
The Project IS located in an urban area within the city of Fresno, Fresno County, California. See Figures 1-4 in Attachment A.
Project Description
Vinland Park Futsal and Pickleball Courts Project
The park is located at 4695 E Gettysburg Avenue (APN 430-020-19T). It encompasses 7.88-acres and offers open green space, a baseball/softball field, tennis courts, and a splash pad.
The proposed Project would include the development of both active and passive recreational opportunities and enhanced amenities at the existing park, including: a futsal court; four pickleball courts; ADA-compliant walkways; a plaza with shade structures, benches, and picnic tables; two drinking fountains; and landscaping with associated irrigation systems.
The Project would be located north of the existing tennis courts. The area is undeveloped, with grass and scattered trees. The area surrounding the Project site is predominantly developed with residential uses to the north, east and south. Vinland Elementa ry School is located immediately adjacent to the west.
Construction of the proposed Project is anticipated to begin in February 2025. Construction would occur over the course of 65 working days. The on-site construction workforce would consist of up to 10 individuals; however, the average daily workforce would vary depending upon the stage in construction.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
There is no right-of-way or land acquisition required for the proposed work. Minimal excavation will occur; trenching for irrigation and potable water lines would be approximately 4 feet in depth.
The majority of the remaining proposed improvements will occur at grade.
Results
The records search indicated that the Vinland Park location has never been surveyed for cultural resources. Four cultural resource studies have been conducted within a half mile of this location, (Smith 1991; Hack 1992a, 1992b; Price 1992; Reiss 1992; Sny der 1992; Dice 2003; Billat 2006; Losee 2013). One historic cultural resource, a segment of the Henry Kachadoorian Bungalow Cottage (primary no. P-10-006863) has been recorded within one half mile of this location.
A Sacred Lands File request was also submitted to the Native American Heritage Commission. A response dated August 1, 2024, indicates negative results (see Attachment B).
Conclusions
Based on the results of cultural records search, the potential to encounter subsurface cultural resources is minimal . Additionally, the Project construction would be conducted within the partially developed and previously disturbed parcel. The potential to uncover subsurface historical or archaeological deposits would be considered unlikely.
However, there is still a possibility that historical or archaeological materials may be exposed during construction. Grading, as well as other ground -disturbing actions , have the potential to damage or destroy these previously unidentified and potentially significant cultural resources within the project area, including historical or archaeological resources. Disturbance of any deposits that have the potential to provide significant cultural data would be considered a significant impact. To reduce the potential impacts of the Project on cultural resources, the project shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations during construction activities.
Robert E. Parr, MS, RPA
Senior Archaeologist
Attachment A - Figures
Attachment B – NAHC Response Letter
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
References
(Note: Alpha-numeric designation in parentheses following citation refers to IC report reference number)
Billat, Lorna
2000 Nextel Communications Wireless Telecommunications Service facility – Fresno County. (FR-01827)
2006 New Tower Submission Packet, FCC Form 620 for Bullard, California, CA-1455F. (FR- 02161)
Dice, Michael
2003 Record Search and Site Visit for Cingular Telecommunications Facility Candidate CV- 762-04 (Super 8 Motel), 2655 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, Fresno County, California. (FR-02162)
Hack, Sheryl
1992a Historic Property Survey Report for the Route 168 Urban Project, Fresno County, California. (FR-02234)
1992b Historic Architectural Survey Report #1 for the Route 168 Urban Project, Fresno County, California. (FR-02234D)
Hatoff, Brian
2011 Verizon Cellular Communications Tower Site – Cedar Tree 6648 North Cedar Avenue (APN: 410-020-535) Fresno, California 93710. (FR-02464) Losee, Carolyn
2013 Cultural Resources Investigation for AT&T Mobility CN2713 “Willow Ave. and Gettysburg Ave.” 2655 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno City and County, California. (FR- 02578)
Price, Barry
1992 Negative Archaeological Survey Report for the Route 168 Urban Project, Fresno County, California. (FR-02234E)
Reiss, Ronald B.
1992 Supplementary Historical Architectural Report for the Route 168 Urban Project, Fresno County, California. (FR-02234B)
Smith, Ephraim
1991 Historic Architectural Report for the Route 168 Urban Project, Freno County, California, Exhibit D. (FR-02234A)
Snyder, John
1992 Historic Architectural Survey Report – MOU Short Form for the Route 168 Urban Project, Fresno County, California. (FR-02234C)
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Attachment A
Figures
Regional Location - Vinland Park Figure
1 Project Area - Vinland Park Figure
2 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
PLSS/USGS - Vinland Park Figure
3 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Topography - Vinland Park Figure
4 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Attachment B
NAHC Response Letter
Attachment D - Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance Calculations
Vinland Park Water Usage Estimates:
Removed turf area due to new construction: 28,220 sf.
Removed trees due to new construction: 7 trees 4 Chinese Elm and Pinus spp. (3) – They are sized at 24” trunk Existing Water Demand
Vinland Futsal and Pickleball Courts - Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet Reference Eto 51.5
Hydrozone/Plant
Description
Plant
Factor
(PF)
Irrigation
Method
Irrigation
Efficiency
(IE)
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape
Area (S.F .)
ETAF x
Area
Estimated
Total
Water Use
(ETWU)
Regular Landscape
Area
HZ2 -Moderate (Trees) 0.6 Rotor 0.75 0.80 28220 22576 720852 Totals 28220 22576 720852
Special Landscape
Area
1 0 0 0
ETWU Total 720852
MAWA Total Eto 0.62 ETAF LA 1-ETAF SLA
51.5 0.62 0.45 28220 0.55 0 405479
MAWA-ETWU= -315373
Replacement trees: 10 trees - PISTACIA C. 'KEITH DAVEY' / CHINESE PISTACHE 24” BOX Project Water Demand:
Vinland Futsal and Pickleball Courts - Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet Reference Eto 51.5
Hydrozone/Plant
Description
Plant
Factor
(PF)
Irrigation
Method
Irrigation
Efficiency
(IE)
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape
Area (S.F .)
ETAF x
Area
Estimated
Total Water
Use
(ETWU)
Regular Landscape Area
HZ2 -Moderate (Trees) 0.35 Bubbler 0.81 0.43 1767 764 24379 Totals 1767 764 24379
Special Landscape Area
1 0 0 0
ETWU Total 24379
MAWA Total Eto 0.62 ETAF LA 1-ETAF SLA
51.5 0.62 0.45 1767 0.55 0 25389
MAWA-ETWU= 1010