Exhibit H
Development Permit No. P23-03784 Department and Agency Comments
To be checked when completed where applicable
1. Airports:
Airspace Protection
• Airspace review required for any objects (temporary or permanent) over 100 feet tall. 2. Air Pollution Control District:
2/1/2024: CEQA Comment Letter Submitted.
7/10/2024: Per an email from SJVAPCD on 7/10/2024, since the increase in construction is minimal and there is no increase in operational emission, there will be no revisions to the previously provided comment letter dated February 1, 2024. 3. Council Member:
No comment. No response received within timeframe.
4. Fresno Unified School District:
Fresno Unified School District response uploaded to Documents. Thank you. 5. DPU Solid Waste Division:
2/16/2024: Review completed with conditions. DPU conditions of approval uploaded to documents section.
6/4/2024: Review complete. Previously issued conditions are valid and still applicable. 6. DPU Planning and Engineering:
2/16/2024: Review completed with conditions. DPU conditions of approval uploaded to documents section.
6/4/2024: Review complete. Previously issued conditions are valid and still applicable. 7. DPU Water Division:
2/16/2024: Review completed with conditions. DPU conditions of approval uploaded to documents section.
6/4/2024: Review complete. Previously issued conditions are valid and still applicable. 8. Development And Impact Fee Estimate:
City of Fresno Development Impact Fee Estimate - Reference document: P23-03784 - Golden Charter Academy - 741 W Belmont Ave.pdf
9. DPW - Traffic Planning:
3/8/2024: Conditions will be uploaded once Public Works has had a chance to review and comment on the Traffic Impact Study and overhead utility conversion to underground system. For questions contact Braulio Flores at [email protected] or at (559) 621-8806.
6/20/2024: See Public Works, Land Planning Section conditions of approval and redline Exhibit CP1, in the record attachments. For questions, please contact Braulio Flores at [email protected] or at (559) 621-8806.
8/23/2024: See Public Works, Land Planning Section REVISED conditions of approval, in the record attachments. For questions, please contact Braulio Flores at [email protected] or at (559) 621-8806.
10. DPW – TIS Review:
3/13/2024, Additional Information Requested : Comments provided on TIS Scope via email on 3/13/2024.
6/3/2024, Review Complete: See attached TIS 24-002 P23-03784 P23-03785 Letter dated 2024- 05-31.
11. DPW – CFD:
If development is required to install pedestrian- oriented lighting, CFD annexation will be applicable. See Public Works, Traffic Planning's Conditions of Approval for maintenance requirements.
12. DPW Public Works Engineering:
2/8/2024: See Public Works, Traffic Planning's Conditions of Approval for Street Tree requirements.
6/3/2024: See Public Works, Traffic Planning's Conditions of Approval for street tree requirements.
13. Fire Department:
2/6/2024, Revisions Required: All back checks are performed electronically through the Accela Program (FAASTER portal). You must submit the following documentation to the Building Department:
1) Provide copy of the original submittals (drawings, calculations, and supporting documents) including mark-ups from the plan reviewers who worked on your documents.
2) Provide a complete set of revised drawings, calculations, and supporting documents addressing plan check comments (all changes shall be clouded).
3) Provide a detailed typed response to each item listed in the plan check correction comments document. If you have additional questions regarding back check submittals, please contact the Building Department.
If you have questions and would like more information regarding FFD Development Policies, please see the following: https://www.fresno.gov/fire-training/manuals-and-forms/
Fire Department back check items require a sign-off from Fire Department staff. Back check items signed by any person other than sworn Fire Department staff are invalid.
All revisions to plans shall be called out with a cloud or delta.
This project was reviewed by the Fire Department only for requirements related to water supply, fire hydrants, and fire apparatus access to the building(s) on site. Review for compliance with fire and life safety requirements for the building interior and its intended use are reviewed by both the Fire Department and the Building and Safety Section of DARM when a submittal for building plan review is made as required by the California Building Code by the architect or engineer of record for the building.
1. Note the following on the plan: Address Identification. For new and existing buildings, the fire code official is authorized to require approved address or building area identification signage as needed to readily determine the building or area of a building protected by fire department connections. 2022 FMC, Section 10-50912.4.4
2. The minimum size of all fire department connections shall be based upon the system type.
No connection shall be less than 2½ inch in size. (FFD Development Policy 405.025)
3. The DRC Notes address access to the eastern wing. The submitted site plan indicates an emergency fire access drive; it appears the access drive needs to be extended to meet the following requirement: All building openings shall be accessible within 200 feet of a public street, private driveway, or other approved access. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
4. Site plan, keynote #25, the legend does not indicate the surface of the fire access drive.
Clarify the drive access material and note the following on the plan: Required fire apparatus access lanes shall be provided year -round and maintained with an approved all -weather surface, capable of supporting 80,000- pound vehicles. The fire apparatus access lanes shall be a minimum of 4- inch base rock over compacted or undisturbed native soil or per approved engineering plans with a minimum of 24 feet of clear width or other approved method, which would prevent shoulder degradation. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
5. Site plan, keynote #25, the fire drive access appears to below the 20ft requirement.
Revise/show the drive access width and note the following on the plan: Regardless of parking configurations, a minimum clear drive width of 20 feet shall be required. The Fire Marshal (or designee) may require increases in these widths. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
6. Site plan, keynote #25 indicates the drive approach is to the P-59 standard. Revise the P- 59 to the following: An emergency drive approach shall be installed at the entrance of the fire department only access road which complies with Public Works Standard Drawing P- 67 and P-68.
7. Note the following on the plan: An approved Fire/Police padlock shall be installed on gates used solely for emergency vehicle access. Fire/Police padlocks may be used in conjunction with other approved locking devices. Padlocks shall be an approved City of Fresno bypass lock. (FFD Development Policy 403.002) Fire/Police padlocks may be purchased only through Sierra Lock & Glass, 1560 N. Palm Avenue, Fresno, CA 93728. (FFD Development Policy 403.004)
8. Applicable to site plan keynote #25, provide the following note on the plan: Emergency access gates across entrances that have been designed for use by fire and police personnel only shall be designated on the properties site plan prior to construction of the complex. (FFD Development Policy 403.005) The sign below is required on both sides of the gate: “FIRE LANE” (in 6 -inch letters) “VEHICLES REMOVED AT OWNER’S EXPENSE” (in 2-inch letters) “FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT @ (559) 621 -7000” (in 1-inch letters)
9. Site plan, south side of Building C at the MRP, there appears to be a pedestrian gate.
Clarify if this is a pedestrian gate; it was used to measure walking access hose pull. This gate and the pedestrian gate along Delno shall be 4ft in width: All gates acr oss fire hose and equipment access points shall be a minimum of 4-foot clear width.
10. Note the following on the plan: Fire hose pull, and equipment access is an unobstructed walkway which provides continuous access connecting vehicular access to all building openings and exterior storage areas. The walkway requires unobstructed 36- inch horizontal clearance around openings and continuous 7- foot vertical clearance. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
11. Note the following on the plan: Required walking access shall be designed to prevent sharp turns and obstacles which would hinder the carrying of hoses, ground ladders and other handheld equipment.
12. Note the following on the plan: All required fire hose and equipment access gates shall remain unlocked or be provided with Police/Fire bypass locks. (“Best” padlock model 21B700 series). A Knox padlock may not be used. Police/Fire bypass locks can be purchased only through Sierra Lock & Glass, 1560 N. Palm Avenue, Fresno, CA 93728.
6/7/2024, Final Approval: Approved as submitted. No appointment or initial required. Approval of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from applicable adopted codes and adopted standards. Final approval is subject to field inspection. 14. Flood Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Fees:
See attached FMFCD Notice of Requirements (NOR). NOR Review fees & Grading Plan Review fees are due. $71 NOR Review Fee and $363 Grading Plan Review fee all due on this project. 15. Fresno County Environmental Health:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
• Concurrent to submitting plans to the State Architect, the applicant shall also submit complete food facility plans and specifications to the Fresno County Department of Public Health Department, Environmental Health Division for review and approval. Contact the Consumer Food Protection Program at (559) 600-3357 for more information.
• Prior to cafeteria/food service operations, the applicant will be required to obtain a permit to operate a food facility from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division. A permit, once issued, is nontransferable. Contact t he Consumer Food Protection Program at (559) 600-3357 for more information.
• Applicants proposing to use and/or store hazardous materials and/or hazardous wastes, they shall meet the requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Division 20, Chapter 6.95, and the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division
4.5. Any business that handles a hazardous material or hazardous waste may be required to submit a Hazardous Materials Business Plan pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), Division 20, Chapter 6.95, Section 25507 (http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/).
Contact the Fresno County Hazmat Compliance Program at (559) 600 -3271 for more information.
• The proposed project has the potential to expose nearby residents to elevated noise levels.
It is recommended that the city require a noise study to offer potential mitigation measures to residential homes abutting the project. Consideration should be gi ven to your city’s municipal code.
• As a measure to protect ground water, all water wells and/or septic systems that exist or have been abandoned within the project area should be properly destroyed by an appropriately licensed contractor.
• Should any underground storage tank(s) be found during the project, the applicant shall apply for and secure an Underground Storage Tank Removal Permit from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division. Contact the Certified Unified Program Agency at (559) 600-3271 for more information.
The following comments pertain to the demolition of any existing structure(s):
• Should the structure(s) have an active rodent or insect infestation, the infestation should be abated prior to demolition of the structure in order to prevent the spread of vectors to adjacent properties.
• In the process of demolishing the existing structure(s), the contractor may encounter asbestos containing construction materials and materials coated with lead-based paints.
• If asbestos containing materials are encountered, contact the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District at (559) 230-6000 for more information.
• If the structure(s) were constructed prior to 1979 or if lead- based paint is suspected to have been used in the structure(s), then prior to demolishing work the contractor should contact the following agencies for current regulations and requirements:
o California Department of Public Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, at (560) 620-5600.
o United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, at (415) 947-8000.
o State of California, Industrial Relations Department, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Consultation Service (CAL-OSHA) at (559) 454-5302. 16. Flood Irrigation District:
Please refer applicant to FID's comments in Documents.
17. Historic Preservation:
This item has been discussed in the Historic Preservation Commission meeting on July 24, 2023.
It was found that the existing building is not eligible for Fresno's Local Register of historic places. 18. PG&E:
Please see the PG&E Impact Letter uploaded to the project documents. 19. Police Department:
No comment.
20. Building and Safety:
The items below require a separate process with additional fees and timelines, in addition to the Development Permit Application process. Be advised the following are preliminary comments based on the drawings submitted to the Planning and Development Division.
1) Building, Grading and Utility plans are required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Division for approval permits for the proposed project.
All construction documents shall be designed, stamped, and signed by a licensed architect/engineer.
Provide a complete code analysis for all proposed buildings within the construction documents.
The proposed buildings shall meet all the requirements of CBC section 452. 21. Long Range Planning:
Property is located in an area with a recently adopted plan [Downtown Neighborhood Community Plan] Please see www.fresno.gov/downtownplan for more information. 22. Fresno Area Express:
No comment.
23. Council District Committee:
The Council District 3 Project Review Committee was presented this project on February 27, 2024. There were three committee members present, and they all recommended approval of the project. Draft minutes have been uploaded to the record. 24. US Postal Service:
No comment. No response within timeframe.
Planned Development Permit No. P23-03785 Department and Agency Comments
To be checked when completed where applicable
1. Council District Committee:
The Council District 3 Project Review Committee was presented this project on February 27, 2024. There were three committee members present, and they all recommended approval of the project.
2. Council Member:
No comment. No response received within timeframe.
3. Fire Department:
2) 2/6/2024, Revisions Required: All additional/revised submittals are performed electronically through the Accela Program (FAASTER portal). You must submit the following documentation: Provide copy of the original submittals (drawings, calculations, and supporting documents) including mark -ups from the plan reviewers who worked on your documents.
3) Provide a complete set of revised drawings, calculations, and supporting documents addressing plan check comments (all changes shall be clouded or noted with a delta). 3) Provide a detailed typed response to each item listed in the plan check correction comments document. If you have additional questions regarding additional/revised submittals, please contact the Building Department.
If there are questions regarding FFD Development Policies, you may access them at:
https://www.fresno.gov/fire-training/manuals-and-forms/.
Fire Department correction items require approval from Fire Department staff. Correction items approved by any person other than sworn Fire Department staff are invalid.
All revisions to plans shall be called out with a cloud or delta.
1. Note on plan: All private streets and driveways that are provided for common access and are required for Fire Department access shall be constructed to a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet. For drives separated by a median, 15-foot minimum lanes are required.
2. Show on plan with width on the East side 20' fire drive lane. The fire lane measures 14 feet wide. The lane must measure 20 feet wide starting from the street.
3. Note on plan: Gates, posts, or other barriers approved by the fire department shall be installed at each entrance to emergency vehicle access points. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
4. Note on plan: Emergency access gates across entrances that have been designed for use by fire and police personnel only shall be designated on the properties site plan prior to construction of the complex. (FFD Development Policy 403.005) The sign below is required on both sides of the gate: “FIRE LANE” (in 6-inch letters) “VEHICLES REMOVED AT OWNER’S EXPENSE” (in 2-inch letters) “FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT @ (559) 621-7000” (in 1-inch letters)
5. Note on plan: An approved Fire/Police padlock shall be installed on gates used solely for emergency vehicle access. Fire/Police padlocks may be used in conjunction with other approved locking devices. Padlocks shall be an approved City of Fresno bypass lock. (FFD Development Policy 403.002) Fire/Police padlocks may be purchased only through Sierra Lock & Glass, 1560 N. Palm Avenue, Fresno, CA 93728. (FFD Development Policy 403.004)
6. Emergency vehicle access shall be designated by painting the curb red (top and side) and stenciling “FIRE LANE NO PARKING” in 3 -inch white letters on the most vertical curb, at least every 50 feet. If no curb is present, a minimum 6-inch-wide red stripe shall be painted along the edge of the roadway with “FIRE LANE” in 3- inch white letters at least every 50 feet. (FFD Development Policy 403.005)
7. Show on plan: Fire Lane in front of the East side 20' fire drive lane.
8. Note on plan: An emergency drive approach shall be installed at the entrance of the fire department only access road which complies with Public Works Standard Drawing P -67 and P-68.
9. Note on plan: All building openings shall be accessible within 200 feet of a public street, private driveway, or other approved access. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
10. Note on plan: All types of vehicle access shall maintain a minimum of 13 feet, 6- inch vertical clearance over the entire width of the access. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
11. Note on plan: All types of access shall not exceed a 10 percent grade or contain any irregularity creating an angle of approach or departure in excess of 10 percent, except as approved by the Fire Marshal (or designee). (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
12. Note on plan: The minimum size of all fire department connections shall be based upon the system type. No connection shall be less than 2½ inch in size. (FFD Development Policy 405.025)
13. Note on plan: Fire department connections shall be located on the street side of buildings or facing approved fire apparatus access roads, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise app roved by the fire chief. 2022 CFC, Section 912.2.1.
14. Note on plan: Address Identification. For new and existing buildings, the fire code official is authorized to require approved address or building area identification signage as needed to readily determine the building or area of a building protected by fi re department connections. 2022 FMC, Section 10-50912.4.4
15. Note on plan: Fire hose pull, and equipment access is an unobstructed walkway which provides continuous access connecting vehicular access to all building openings and exterior storage areas. The walkway requires unobstructed 36- inch horizontal clearance around openings and continuous 7- foot vertical clearance. (FFD Development Policy 403.002)
16. Note on plan: Required walking access shall be designed to prevent sharp turns and obstacles which would hinder the carrying of hoses, ground ladders and other handheld equipment.
17. Note on plan: All gates across fire hose and equipment access points shall be a minimum of 4-foot clear width.
18. Note on plan: All required fire hose and equipment access gates shall remain unlocked or be provided with Police/Fire bypass locks. (“Best” padlock model 21B700 series). A Knox padlock may not be used. Police/Fire bypass locks can be purchased only through Sierra Lock & Glass, 1560 N. Palm Avenue, Fresno, CA 93728.
19. Show on plan: X -1 keyed “Best” padlock model 21B700 series, or X -1 key box on the outside by the Westside fire access sliding gates (#30).
20. Note on plan: Fire hydrants and access roads shall be installed, tested and approved and shall be maintained serviceable prior to and during all phases of development. The 4½ inch outlet shall face the access lane.
21. This project was reviewed by the Fire Department only for requirements related to water supply, fire hydrants, and fire apparatus access to the building(s) on site. Review for compliance with fire and life safety requirements for the building interior and its intended use are reviewed by both the Fire Department and the Building and Safety Section of DARM when a submittal for building plan review is made as required by the California Building Code by the architect or engineer of record for the building.
6/7/2024, Final Approval: Approved as submitted. No appointment or initial required. Approval of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from applicable adopted codes and adopted standards. Final approval is subject to field inspection.
February 1, 2024
Brittany Martin
City of Fresno
Development and Resource Management Department
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043
Fresno, CA 93721
Project: Development Permit Application No. P23-03784
District CEQA Reference No: 20240073
Dear Ms. Martin,
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Development Permit (DP) from the City of Fresno (City) for the above project. Per the DP, the project consists of the construction of a new Fresno Unified School District K – 8 Charter School, on 2.35 total acres, made up of 19 classrooms at 34,499 square feet (Project). The Project is located at 741 West Belmont Avenue in Fresno, CA. The Project lies within one of the communities in the state selected by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for investment of additional air quality resources and attention under Assembly Bill (AB) 617 (Garcia) in an effort to reduce air pollution exposure in impacted disadvantaged communities.
The District offers the following comments at this time regarding the Project:
Assembly Bill 617
AB 617 requires CARB and air districts to develop and implement Community Emission Reduction Programs (CERPs) in an effort to reduce air pollution exposure in impacted disadvantaged communities, like those in which the Project is located.
The South Central Fresno AB 617 community is one of the statewide communities selected by CARB for development and implementation of a CERP.
Following extensive community engagement and collaboration with the Community Steering Committee, the CERP for the South Central Fresno Community was adopted by the District’s Governing Board in September 2019 and by CARB in February 2020.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 2 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
During the development of the CERP, the Community Steering Committee expressed concerns regarding the proximity of emission sources to nearby sensitive receptors like schools, homes, day care centers, and hospitals, and the potential future industrial development within the community that may exacerbate the cumulative exposure burden for community residents. The Community Steering Committee also expressed the desire for more meaningful avenues of engagement surrounding the land-use decisions in the area. As these issues can most effectively be addressed through strong partnerships between community members and local land-use agencies. Furthermore, the District recommends the City assess the emission reductions measures and strategies included in the CERP and address them in the environmental assessment, as appropriate, to align the City work with the air pollution and exposure reduction strategies and measures outlined in the CERP.
For more information regarding the CERP approved for South Central, please visit the District’s website at:
http://community.valleyair.org/selected-communities/south-central-fresno
Project Related Emissions
At the federal level under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the District is designated as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standards and serious nonattainment for the particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) standards. At the state level under California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), the District is designated as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 standards.
Based on information provided to the District, Project specific annual criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operation are not expected to exceed any of the significance thresholds as identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI):
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.
Construction Emissions
The District recommends, to reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the Project should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.
Health Risk Screening/Assessment
The City should evaluate the risk associated with the Project for sensitive receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) in the area and mitigate any potentially significant risk to help limit exposure of sensitive receptors to emissions.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 3 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
To determine potential health impacts on surrounding receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) a Prioritization and/or a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be performed for the Project. These health risk determinations should quantify and characterize potential Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Air Resources Board (OEHHA/CARB) that pose a present or potential hazard to human health.
Health risk analyses should include all potential air emissions from the project, which include emissions from construction of the project, including multi-year construction, as well as ongoing operational activities of the project. Note, two common sources of TACs can be attributed to diesel exhaust emitted from heavy-duty off-road earth moving equipment during construction, and from ongoing operation of heavy-duty on-road trucks.
Prioritization (Screening Health Risk Assessment):
A “Prioritization” is the recommended method for a conservative screening-level health risk assessment. The Prioritization should be performed using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) methodology. Please contact the District for assistance with performing a Prioritization analysis.
The District recommends that a more refined analysis, in the form of an HRA, be performed for any project resulting in a Prioritization score of 10 or greater. This is because the prioritization results are a conservative health risk representation, while the detailed HRA provides a more accurate health risk evaluation.
Health Risk Assessment:
Prior to performing an HRA, it is strongly recommended that land use agencies/ project proponents develop and submit for District review a health risk modeling protocol that outlines the sources and methodologies that will be used to perform the HRA.
A development project would be considered to have a potentially significant health risk if the HRA demonstrates that the health impacts would exceed the District’s established risk thresholds, which can be found here:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.
A project with a significant health risk would trigger all feasible mitigation measures.
The District strongly recommends that development projects that result in a significant health risk not be approved by the land use agency.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 4 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
The District is available to review HRA protocols and analyses. For HRA submittals please provide the following information electronically to the District for review:
HRA (AERMOD) modeling files
HARP2 files
Summary of emissions source locations, emissions rates, and emission factor calculations and methodologies.
For assistance, please contact the District’s Technical Services Department by:
E-Mailing inquiries to: [email protected]
Calling (559) 230-5900
Recommended Measure: Development projects resulting in TAC emissions should be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors to prevent the creation of a significant health risk in accordance to CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective located at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/resource-center/strategy- development/land-use-resources.
Ambient Air Quality Analysis
An Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA) uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emissions increases from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The District recommends an AAQA be performed for the Project if emissions exceed 100 pounds per day of any pollutant.
An AAQA uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emission increase from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambien Air Quality Standards. An acceptable analysis would include emissions from both project- specific permitted and non-permitted equipment and activities. The District recommends consultation with District staff to determine the appropriate model and input data to use in the analysis.
Specific information for assessing significance, including screening tools and modeling guidance, is available online at the District’s website:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.
Vegetative Barriers and Urban Greening
There are single-family residential units surrounding the Project, in addition to the Fresno Chaffee Zoo, which is north of the Project. The District suggests the City consider the feasibility of incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 5 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units, Zoo).
While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, vegetative barriers have been shown to be an additional measure to potentially reduce a population’s exposure to air pollution through the interception of airborne particles and the update of gaseous pollutants. Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.
Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment in the Community
Since the Project consists of educational development, gas-powered educational lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits. The District recommends the Project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment. More information on the District CGYM program and funding can be found at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/grants/zero-emission- landscaping-equipment-voucher-program/.
On-Site Solar Deployment
It is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zero- carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The District suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for the Project.
District Rules and Regulations
The District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 6 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes.
The list of rules below is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. Current District rules can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/rules-and-planning/current-district-rules- and-regulations/. To identify other District rules or regulations that apply to future projects, or to obtain information about District permit requirements, the project proponents are strongly encouraged to contact the District’s Small Business Assistance (SBA) Office at (559) 230-5888.
District Rules 2010 and 2201 - Air Quality Permitting for Stationary Sources
Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using Best Available Control Technology (BACT).
This Project may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, the Project proponent should submit to the District an application for an ATC. For further information or assistance, the project proponent may contact the District’s SBA Office at (559) 230-5888.
District Rule 9510 - Indirect Source Review (ISR)
The Project is subject to District Rule 9510 because it will receive a project- level discretionary approval from a public agency and will equal or exceed 9,000 square feet of educational development.
The purpose of District Rule 9510 is to reduce the growth in both NOx and PM emissions associated with development and transportation projects from mobile and area sources; specifically, the emissions associated with the construction and subsequent operation of development projects. The ISR Rule requires developers to mitigate their NOx and PM emissions by incorporating clean air design elements into their projects. Should the proposed development project clean air design elements be insufficient to meet the required emission reductions, developers must pay a fee that ultimately funds incentive projects to achieve off-site emissions reductions.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 7 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
Per Section 5.0 of the ISR Rule, an Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application is required to be submitted no later than applying for project-level approval from a public agency. As of the date of this letter, the District has not received an AIA application for this Project. Please inform the project proponent to immediately submit an AIA application to the District to comply with District Rule 9510 so that proper mitigation and clean air design under ISR can be incorporated into the Project’s design.
Information about how to comply with District Rule 9510 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview
The AIA application form can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview/forms- and-applications/
District staff is available to provide assistance and can be reached by phone at (559) 230-5900 or by email at [email protected].
District Rule 4002 (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)
In the event an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed, the Project may be subject to District Rule 4002. This rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility is demolished or renovated. Information on how to comply with District Rule
4002 can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/demolition- renovation/
District Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings)
The Project may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it may utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs.
The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings.
In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements. Additional information on how to comply with District Rule 4601 requirements can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/tkgjeusd/rule-4601.pdf
District Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)
The project proponent may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving activities as described in Regulation VIII, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 8 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities.
Should the project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5- acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). For additional information regarding the written notification or Dust Control Plan requirements, please contact District Compliance staff at (559) 230-5950.
The application for both the Construction Notification and Dust Control Plan can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/fm3jrbsq/dcp-form.docx
Information about District Regulation VIII can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/dustcontrol
Other District Rules and Regulations
The Project may also be subject to the following District rules: Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).
District Comment Letter
The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Dylan Casares by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (559) 230-2374.
Sincerely,
Brian Clements
Director of Permit Services
For: Mark Montelongo
Program Manager
June 13, 2024 Planning Department City of Fresno 2600 Fresno St., 3rd Floor Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Re: Air Impact Assessment (AIA) Application Approval ISR Project Number: C-20240175 Land Use Agency: City of Fresno Land Use Agency ID Number: Development Permit/planned Development (P24-03784 and P24-03785) To Whom It May Concern: The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has approved the Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application for the Golden Charter Academy, Belmont Campus project, located at 705 and 741 W Belmont Ave in Fresno, California. The Project consists of a 34,499 square foot K-8 charter school with a 480 student and 60 staff capacity. The District has determined that the mitigated baseline emissions for construction and operation will be less than two tons NOx per year and two tons PM10 per year. Pursuant to District Rule 9510 Section 4.3, this project is exempt from the requirements of Section 6.0 (General Mitigation Requirements) and Section 7.0 (Off-site Emission Reduction Fee Calculations and Fee Schedules) of the rule. As such, the District has determined that this project complies with the emission reduction requirements of District Rule 9510 and is not subject to payment of off-site fees. Pursuant to District Rule 9510, Section 8.4, the District is providing you with the following information: A notification of AIA approval (this letter) A statement of tentative rule compliance (this letter) An approved Monitoring and Reporting Schedule A copy of the Air Impact Assessment Application Certain emission mitigation measures proposed by the applicant may be subject to approval or enforcement by the City of Fresno. No provision of District Rule 9510 requires action on the part of the City of Fresno, however, please review the enclosed list of mitigation measures and notify the District if the proposed mitigation measures are
for this project. The District can provide the detailed emissions analysis upon request. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Harout A Sagherian by telephone at (559) 230-5860 or by email at [email protected]. Sincerely, Tom Jordan Director of Policy and Government Affairs For: Mark Montelongo Program Manager Enclosures
SJVUAPCDIndirect Source Review6/13/24Complete Project Summary Sheet &10:32 amMonitoring and Reporting ScheduleProject Name:GOLDEN CHARTER ACADEMY, BELMONT CAMPUSApplicant Name:GOLDEN CHARTER ACADEMYProject Location:705 AND 741 W BELMONT AVEBELMONT NEAR SR 99APN(s): 458-121-17, 458-121-19Project Description:LAND USE: Educational Facilities - 34499 Square Feet - Elementary SchoolEducational Facilities - 34499 Square Feet - Elementary SchoolEducational Facilities - 34499 Square Feet - Elementary SchoolEducational Facilities - 34499 Square Feet - Elementary SchoolACREAGE: 2.31ISR Project ID Number:C-20240175Applicant ID Number:C-303955Permitting Public Agency:CITY OF FRESNOPublic Agency Permit No.DEVELOPMENT PERMIT/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P24-03784 AND P24-03785)Existing Emission Reduction MeasuresEnforcing AgencyMeasureQuantificationNotesThere are no Existing Measures for this project.Non-District Enforced Emission Reduction MeasuresEnforcing AgencyMeasureSpecific ImplementationSource Of RequirementsCITY OF FRESNOImprove Pedestrial NetworkWithin Project SiteNumber of Non-District Enforced Measures: 1District Enforced Emission Reduction MeasuresEnforcing AgencyMeasureSpecific ImplementationMeasure For ComplianceDistrict ReviewSJVAPCDConstruction and Operation - Exempt from Off-site FeeFor each project phase, within 30-days of issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, if applicable, submit to the District a summary report of the construction start, and end dates, and the date of issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Otherwise, submit to the District a summary report of the construction start and end dates within 30-days of the end of each phase of construction.(Compliance Dept. Review)1 SJVUAPCDIndirect Source Review6/13/24Complete Project Summary Sheet &10:32 amMonitoring and Reporting Schedule(District Enforced Emission Reduction Measures Continued)Enforcing AgencyMeasureSpecific ImplementationMeasure For ComplianceDistrict ReviewSJVAPCDConstruction and Operation - RecordkeepingFor each project phase, all records shall be maintained on site during construction and for a period of ten years following either the end of construction or the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, whichever is later. Records shall be made available for District inspection upon request.(Compliance Dept. Review)SJVAPCDConstruction and Operational DatesFor each project phase, maintain records of (1) the construction start and end dates and (2) the date of issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, if applicable.(Compliance Dept. Review)SJVAPCDImprove Destination Accessibility1.98 miles (distance to downtown or job center)(Compliance Dept. Review)SJVAPCDIncrease Transit Accessibility1/4 miles (distance to transit station)(Compliance Dept. Review)Number of District Enforced Measures: 5 2 Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Indirect Source Review (ISR) - Air Impact Assessment (AIA) Application A. Applicant Information
Applicant/Business Name:
Mailing Address: City: State: Zip:
Contact: Title:
Is the Applicant a licensed state contractor? No Yes, please provide State License number:
Phone: Email:
B. Agent Information (if applicable)
Agent/Business Name:
Mailing Address: City: State: Zip:
Contact: Title:
Phone: Email:
C. Project Information
Project Name:
Project Location Street: City: Zip:
Cross Streets: County:
Permitting Agency: Planner: Contact Number:
Permit Type and Number (if known):
Subject to Project-Level Discretionary Approval? Yes No Last Project-Level Discretionary Approval Date:
Last Project-Level Ministerial Approval Date:
D. Project Description
Please briefly describe the project (e.g.: 300 multi-family residential units apartments or 6 miles road widening):
For Residential/Non-Residential/Mixed-Use please check the box next to each applicable land use below:
Commercial / Retail Educational Office Warehouse
Residential Government Industrial Distribution Center Recreational (e.g. park) Medical Manufacturing Other:
For Transportation/Transit please check the box next to each applicable land use below:
New Road Construction Expansion to an Existing Road Bridge / Overpass Interchange or Intersection Improvements
Select land use setting: Urban Rural
E. Notice of Violation
Is this application being submitted as a result of receiving a Notice of Violation (NOV)? No Yes, NOV #:
FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY
Filing Fee
Received: _________________
Date Paid:_________________
Applicant #: _______________
Check
#:_____________________
Project
#:_____________________
Date Stamp: Finance Date Stamp: Permit
Golden Charter Academy
2445 Capitol Street #110
Fresno
CA
93721
Robert Golden
President and CEO
559-515-6417
PO Box 4772
Fresno
CA
93744
Zack Urban Solutions, Inc.
Dan Zack
President
650-743-5960
[email protected]
Golden Charter Academy, Belmont Campus
705 and 741 W Belmont Ave
Fresno
93728
Belmont near SR 99
Fresno
City of Fresno
Brittany Martin
559-621-8059
Development Permit/Planned Development (P24-03784 and P24-03785) NA
NA
The Golden Charter Academy, presently located at 1626 W Princeton Ave, proposes to construct a new campus in the Parkside neighborhood for a K – 8 charter school. The school will have 34,499 SF of building floor area and a capacity of 480 students and 60 staff members.
C-303955
Received
5/16/2024
SJVAPCD
Permit ServicesC-20240175
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
F. Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement (VERA)
Is this project part of a larger project for which there is a VERA with the District? No Yes, VERA #:
G. Optional Section
Do you want to receive information about the Healthy Air Living Business Partners Program? No Yes H. Parcel and Land Owner Information
APN (000-000-00 Format) Gross Acres Land Owner
1. 2.
3. Additional sheets for listing APN numbers can be found on the District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR.
I. Project Development and Operation
Will the project require demolition of existing structures? Yes, complete J No, complete K
J. Demolition
Total square feet of building(s) footprint to be demolished: Number of Building Stories:
Demolition Start Date (Month/Year): Number of Days for Demolition:
K. Timing
Expected number of work days per week during construction? 5 days 6 days 7 days For Transportation/Transit projects, please complete L-1 For Residential/Non-Residential/Mixed-Use projects,
will it be developed in multiple phases?
No, complete L-2
Yes, complete L-3
L-1. Transporation / Transit Development and Timing Details Please note that development timelines provided within this section should reflect actual work time, and should not account for possible project delays.
Start of Construction (Month/Year): End of Construction (Month/Year):
Number of actual construction days:
Length of road being constructed: miles Width of road being constructed: feet Predominant Soil Type (choose one): Sand Gravel Weathered Rock – Earth Blasted Rock Amount of soil imported: cubic yards Amount of soil exported: cubic yards Amount of asphalt imported: cubic yards Amount of asphalt exported: cubic yards Total area to be disturbed: acres Maximum area disturbed per day: acres Average truck capacity: cubic yards Will water trucks be used? Yes No L-2. Single Phase Development
Start of Construction (Month/Year): Gross Acres:
End of Construction (Month/Year): Net Acres (area devoted to buildings/structures):
First Date of Occupation (Month/Year): Paved Parking Area (# of Spaces):
Building Square Footage: Number of Dwelling Units:
L-3. Phased Site Development and Building Construction In addition to the information below you can submit phase specific activity timeline found on District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR. 1 Start of Construction (Month/Year): Gross Acres:
End of Construction (Month/Year): Net Acres (area devoted to buildings/structures):
First Date of Occupation (Month/Year): Paved Parking Area (# of Spaces):
Building Square Footage: Number of Dwelling Units:
2 Start of Construction (Month/Year): Gross Acres:
End of Construction (Month/Year): Net Acres (area devoted to buildings/structures):
First Date of Occupation (Month/Year): Paved Parking Area (# of Spaces):
Building Square Footage: Number of Dwelling Units:
458-121-17
458-121-19
Golden Charter Academy
Fresno Chaffee Zoo
1.86 0.45
August 2024
2.31 September 2025
1.5 33
0 34,499
September 2025
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
3 Start of Construction (Month/Year): Gross Acres:
End of Construction (Month/Year): Net Acres (area devoted to buildings/structures):
First Date of Occupation (Month/Year): Paved Parking Area (# of Spaces):
Building Square Footage: Number of Dwelling Units:
4 Start of Construction (Month/Year): Gross Acres:
End of Construction (Month/Year): Net Acres (area devoted to buildings/structures):
First Date of Occupation (Month/Year): Paved Parking Area (# of Spaces):
Building Square Footage: Number of Dwelling Units:
Additional sheets for phasing information can be found on the District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR.
M. On -Site Emission Reduction Measures (Mitigation Measures) Listed below are categories of possible mitigation measures for applicants to implement that will reduce a project’s impact on air quality. Check “Yes” next to any measure that will be utilized for this project, and please complete the corresponding page in this form to identify specifics related to that measure. If a category is not applicable to the project, check “No” and provide justification for not selecting the measure. Also, the applicant is encouraged to provide any mitigation measures including supporting documentation that are not listed on this application form for District consideration. For reference, see www.valleyair.org/ISR for potential additional mitigiation measures.
Clean Construction Fleet Mitgation Measure below can be selected for all development types
1. Clean Construction Fleet (Note: Making a commitment to using less polluting construction equipment) Yes, please complete mitigation measure 1 below
No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________ Operational Mitgation Measure below can be selected for all development types, except for transportation and transit projects
2. Clean On-Road Trucks (e.g. Heavy Duty Trucks, Medium Duty Trucks, and Light Duty Trucks) Note: Operational fleet will use zero and/or near-zero emissions for all or part of its activities.
Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measure 2a through 2c below No, please provide justification why not selected:_________ __________________________________________________
3. On-Site Zero Emission Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment (e.g. electric forklifts and electric yard trucks) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measure 3 below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
4. Solar Panels (e.g. incorporate solar panels in the project) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measure 4 below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
5. Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers (e.g. incorporate onsite EV charging infrastructure) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measure 5 below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
6. Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment (e.g. eletric mowers, electric leaf blowers, electric trimmers, etc.) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measure 6 below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
7. Land Use/Location (e.g. increased density, improve walkability design, increase transit, etc.) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measures 7a through 7f below No, please provide justification why not selected:_
8. Neighborhood/Site Enhancements (e.g. improve pedestrial network, traffic calming measures, NEV network, etc.) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measures 8a through 8c below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
9. Parking Policy/Pricing (e.g. parking cost, on -street market pricing, limit parking supply, etc.) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measure 9a through 9e below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
10. Commute Trip Reduction Programs (e.g. workplace parking charge, employee vanpool/shuttle, ride sharing program, etc.) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measures 10a through 10f below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
11. Hearth (e.g. woodstoves or fireplaces)
Yes, please complete mitigation measure 11 below
No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________
12. Exceed Title 24 (e.g. exceed California Title 24 required energy efficiency for building(s) associated with the project) Yes, please complete applicable mitigation measures 12 below No, please provide justification why not selected:___________________________________________________________ Not applicable
Reducing the off-street parking supply would have subjected the project to extra scrutiny and delay.
We do not control the on-street parking, and the City does not meter parking outside of Downtown.
The school has considered this and is open to it, but has not yet determined it is warranted.
All equipment used will be CARB compliant. The equipment will meet the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) emission standards. CARB-compliant equipment produces fewer harmful emissions, toxins, and particulates. Less polluting vehicles will not be used due to cost considerations.
Not applicable
This is a small non-profit school and it needs to be budget-conscious. 8b: The site area is only 2.31 acres and the street network is already built out. 8c. It is just a small school.
Not applicable (the school does not have off-road vehicles, but will have 2 to 4 electric vans) Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
N. Review Period
You may request a five (5) day period to review a draft of the District’s analysis of your project before it is finalized. However, if you choose this option, it will delay the project’s finalization by five (5) business days.
I request to review a draft of the District’s analysis.
O. Fee Deferral Schedule
If the project’s on-site air pollution reductions (mitigation measure) insufficiently reduced air pollution as outlined in Rule 9510, an off-site fee is assessed based on the excess air pollution. The money collected from this fee will be used by the District to reduce air pollution emissions ‘off-site’ on behalf of the project.
An Applicant may request a deferral of all or part of the ‘off-site’ fees up to, but not to exceed, the start date of construction. The start of construction is any of the following, whichever occcurs first: start of grading, start of demolition, or any other site de velopment activities not mentioned above.
I request a Fee Deferral Schedule, and have enclosed the Fee Deferral Schedule Application.
The Fee Deferral Schedule Application, can be found on the District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR.
P. Change of Project Developer
The Applicant assumes all responsibility for ISR compliance for this project. If the project developer changes, the Applican t must notify the Buyer, and both Buyer and Applicant must file a ‘Change of Project Developer’ form with the District. If there i s a change of project developer, and a ‘Change of Project Developer’ form is not filed with the District, the Applicant will remain liab le for ISR compliance.
The Change of Project Developer form can be found on the District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR.
Q. Attachments
Required:
Tract Map or Project Design Map
Vicinity Map
Application Filing Fee
$841.00 for mixed use / non-residential / transporation / transit projects OR
$562.00 for residential projects only
If applicable:
Letter from Applicant granting Agent authorization
Fee Deferral Schedule Application
Monitoring & Reporting Schedule
Supporting documentation for selected Mitigation
Measures
R. Certification Statement
I certify that I have reviewed and completed the entire application and hereby attest that the information relayed within is tr ue and correct to the best of my knowledge. I commit to implementation of those on -site mitigation measures that I have selected above. I am responsible for notifying the District if I will be unable to implement these mitigation measures. If a committed mitigat ion measure is not implemented, the project may be re-assessed for air quality impacts. (An authorized Agent may sign the form in lieu of the Applicant if an authorization letter signed by the Applicant is provided) .
Name (printed): __________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________ Date: _____________________________________ President
Daniel Zack
May 10, 2024
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure 1: Construction Clean Fleet
Will the project use a construction clean fleet to achieve the emission reductions required by District Rule 9510? (By checking “yes”the Applicant is commiting to achieving the following emission reduction requirements: 20% for NOx and 45% f or PM10 compared to the statewide average.)
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes*, please be aware of the requirements below:
*If yes, daily records of the total hours of operation for each piece of equipment greater than 50 -horsepower being used on the project site during construction must be maintained. Within 30-days of completing construction of each project phase, a report summarizi ng total hours of operation by equipment type, equipment model year and horsepower for each piece of construction equipment greater than 50-horsepower must be submitted to the District. To assist in this recordkeeping, the Construction Clean Fleet Data Template is available on the District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR.
Please note: if the required construction emission reductions under Rule 9510 cannot be achieved, fees are required in order to mitigate the remaining balance of emissions. For each project phase, the District will verify that the fleet details achieved the required emission reductions
Mitigation Measure 2a: Clean On-Road Heavy Duty Trucks Will the project use any operational clean Heavy Duty Trucks (On-road vehicles with a gross vehicle weight greater than 26,000 pounds)?
For example, zero-emission electric trucks and/or near-zero emission trucks meeting CARBs established emission standar d of 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOx.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes*, please complete section below:
1. Number of trucks for Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
2. Trip length in miles each of the following types of trucks will travel one way for the Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
3. Expected number of one-way trips per year for each of the following types of trucks for the Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
*If yes, by selecting this measure there will be a condition placed on the monitoring and reporting schedule to ensure compliance.
Records of the fleet data, including truck type, will be required to be submitted to the District on an annual basis .
Please note: by selecting this measure, you are certifying to the District that the above operational clean fleet vehicles have not been funded by state or District grant programs.
Mitigation Measure 2b: Clean On-Road Medium Duty Vehicles Will the project use any operational clean Medium Duty Vehicles (On-road vehicles with a gross vehicle weight between 14,001 pounds and 26,000 pounds)?
For example, zero-emission electric vehicles, zero emission last mile delivery trucks or vans and/or near-zero emission vehicles meeting CARB’s established emission standard of 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOx.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes*, please complete section below:
1. Number of trucks for Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
2. Trip length in miles each of the following types of trucks will travel one way for the Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
3. Expected number of one-way trips per year for each of the following types of trucks for the Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
*If yes, by selecting this measure there will be a condition placed on the monitoring and reporting schedule to ensure compliance.
Records of the fleet data, including truck type, will be required to be submitted to the District on an annual basis.
Please note: by selecting this measure, you are certifying to the District that the above operational clean fleet vehicles have not been funded by state or District grant programs.
8b: The site area is only 2.31 acres and the street network is already b ssuilt out. 8
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 2c: Clean On-Road Light Duty Vehicles Will the project use any operational clean Light Duty Vehicles (On-road vehicles with a gross vehicle weight below 14,000 pounds)? For example, zero-emission electric vehicles, zero emission last mile delivery trucks or vans and/or near-zero emission vehicles meeting CARBs established emission standard of 0.02 g/bhp-hr NOx.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes*, please complete section below:
1. Number of trucks for Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
2. Trip length in miles each of the following types of trucks will travel one way for the Projec t:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
3. Expected number of one-way trips per year for each of the following types of trucks for the Project:
zero emission trucks: near-zero emission trucks: other types of trucks:
*If yes, by selecting this measure there will be a condition placed on the monitoring and reporting schedule to ensure compliance.
Records of the fleet data, including truck type, will be required to be submitted to the District on an annual basis.
Please note: by selecting this measure, you are certifying to the District that the above operational clean fleet vehicles have not been funded by state or District grant programs.
Mitigation Measure 3: On-Site Zero Emission Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment Will the project use any operational on-site zero emission Off-Road Vehicles and Equipment? (e.g. electric forklifts, electric yard trucks, electric aerial lifts)
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Type of Zero Emission Vehicles
and Equipment
No. of Vehicles
and Equipment Hours/Day Days/Year Horsepower Fuel Type
(CNG, Hydrogen, or Electric)
1. Yard Truck
2. Forklifts
3. Aerial Lifts
4. Other Equipment
Please note: by selecting this measure, you are certifying to the District that the above operational off-road vehicles have not been funded by state or District grant programs.
Additional sheets for listing On-Site Zero Emission Vehicles/Equipment can be found on the District’s website at www.valleyair.org/ISR.
Mitigation Measure 4: Solar Panels
Will the project include the installation of solar panels? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Total power output of solar panels to be installed: kW (e.g.: 200 homes x 3kW=600kW.) Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
TBD
Goal is to cover 100% of power needs
City of Fresno
Building Code
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 5: Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers
Will the project include the installation of electric vehicle (EV) charger(s)? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Number of charging outlet(s) to be installed (Note: a charger may have one or more charging outlets):
Charging level (e.g.: Level 1, Level 2, or DC Fast Charge):
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 6: Clean Landscape Equipment
Will the project utilize clean landscaping equipment? (e.g. electric lawn mowers, electric leaf blowers, etc.) (Note 3% is the assumed statewide average for landscape equipment)
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Percent of electric lawnmower that will be electrically powered:
Percent of leaf blower that will be electrically powered:
Percent of electric chainsaw that will be electrically powered:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation if claiming greater than 3% over statewide average. Attached
Mitigation Measure 7a: Increase Density
Will the Project be located within 1/2 mile radius of increased density? Density is measured in terms of dwelling units or j obs per acre.
A project located in areas of increased density may reduce emissions associated with traffic. *Note: There are approximately 502.4 acres in a 1/2 mile radius.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
1. Number of Dwelling Units within 1/2 radius of Project:
2. Number of Jobs within 1/2 mile radius of Project:
3. Density:
Density is the ‘Number of Dwelling Units’ or ‘Number of Jobs’ within ½ mile radius divided by 502.4 acres.
Dwelling Units per Acre:
Jobs per Acre:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation (e.g.: map) to justify the provided jobs and housing. Attached
Not a residential project.
2 Level 2
City of Fresno
Building Code
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 7b: Increase Diversity
This mitigation measure applies to a project in an Urban Area only. Will the project be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential are present within ¼ mile? Mixed-use development should encourage walking and other non-auto modes of transport and minimize need for external trips.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation (e.g.: map) to justify the project is characterized by various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential are within ¼ mile that encourage walking and non-auto modes of transport.
Attached
Mitigation Measure 7c: Improve Walkability Design
Will the project improve walkability?
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
1. Square Miles within the Study Area:
a. If the distance from the center of the project out to its farthest boundary is less than or equal to ½ mile then the Square Miles within the Study Area will be 0.79. (Enter this value in the blank to the right.) b. If the distance from the center of the project out to its farthest boundary is greater than ½ mile then calculate the area value by: Study Area Square Miles = 3.14 x radius(squared). (Enter this value in the blank to the right.)
Square Miles:
2. Intersection within the Study Area:
Number and type of intersections within the project area:
Number of 3-Way Intersections: x 3 =
Number of 4-Way Intersections: x 4 =
Number of 5-Way Intersections: x 5 =
Total Intersections (sum of above) =
3. Intersection Density within the Study Area:
Intersection Density is the Study Area’s ‘Total Intersections’ value (B.) divided by the ‘Square Miles’ value (A.):
Intersections / sq. mi.
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation (e.g.: map) to justify number of intersections within ½ mile of the project. Attached
Mitigation Measure 7d: Improve Destination Accessibility Will the project be located within 12 miles from downtown or a job center? The location of the project may increase the pote ntial for pedestrians to walk and bike to these destinations and therefore reduce VMT.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Distance to Downtown/Job Center (miles):
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation (e.g: map) to justify the distance of the project to the Downtown/Job Center. Attached
This is a small single-use project, but it will introduce land use variety to the neighborhood, which is predominatly residential. .79
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 7e: Increase Transit Accessibility
Will the project be located near a transit station/stop at least within ¼ mile or near a rail at least within ½ mile that wil l facilitate the use of transit by people traveling to or from the project site? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Distance to Rail Station (miles): ½ mile or less between ½ mile and 3 miles Distance to Transit Station (miles): ¼ mile
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation (e.g.: map) to justify the project is located within ¼ mile of a transit station or within ½ mile of a rail from the project site. Attached
Mitigation measure 7f: Integrate Below Market Rate Housing Will the project require all or a portion of the residential units designated as deed-restricted below-market-rate (BMR) housing? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Percentage of total dwelling units deed-restricted below market rate: % Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other count y or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach supporting documentation to justify all or a portion of the residential units that are designated as deed-restricted below-market-rate housing. Attached
Mitigation Measure 8a: Improve Pedestrian Network
Will the project provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned e xternal streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Select one of the following areas, where pedestrian accommodations will be provided:
within Project Site within Project Site and Connecting Off-Site Project Site is within a Rural setting Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agenc y, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 8b: Provide Traffic Calming Measures Will this project provide traffic calming measures which encourage people to walk or bike instead of using a vehicle (e.g., m arked crosswalks, count-down signal timers, curb extensions, speed tables, raised crosswalks, raised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, roundabouts or mini-circles, on-street parking, planter strips with street trees, chicanes/chokers, and others)? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% Streets with Improvement within ½ mile of project site: 25% 50% 75% 100% % Intersections with Improvement within ½ mile of project site: 25% 50% 75% 100% Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
City of Fresno
City of Fresno Development Code
None needed, this mitigation is met by virtue of the project location
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 8c: Implement Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Network Will the project provide a NEV network including the necessary infrastructure such as parking, charging facilities, striping, signage, and educational tools?
*Note: NEVs are classified in the California Vehicle Code as a “low speed vehicle”.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 9a: Limit Parking Supply
Will the Will the project provide fewer parking spaces than the rate provided by the Institute of Transportation and Engineering (ITE) Parking Generation Handbook?
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% Reduction in Spaces:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 9b: Unbundle Parking Cost
Will the project implement a monthly/annual parking charge? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Monthly Parking Cost for Project Site ($):
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 9c: On-Street Market Pricing
Will this project and the city (in which the project is located) implement a pricing strategy which will increase the on -street public parking (e.g.: meter parking) by at least 25%?
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% Increase in Price: 25% 30% 40% 50%
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 9d: Transit Subsidy
Will the project provide subsidized/discounted daily or monthly public transit passes? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of employees to receive public transit passes:
Please select the closest expected Daily Transit Subsidy Amount ($): $0.75 $1.50 $3 $6 Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 9e: Implement Employee Parking “Cash-Out” Will the project require employers to offer employee parking “cash-out”? The term “cash-out” is used to describe the employer providing employees with a choice of forgoing their current subsidized/free parking for a cash payment.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of employees to receive “cash-out”:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 10a: Workplace Parking Charge
Will the project implement workplace parking pricing at its employment centers (e.g., explicitly charging for parking for its employees, not providing employee parking and transportation allowances, educating employees about available alternatives)? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of employees paying for parking:
Please select the closest expected Daily Cash out Amount ($): $1 $2 $3 $6 Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 10b: Implement School Bus Program
Will the project work with the school district to restore or expand school bus services in the project area and local communi ty? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of families expected to using school bus program (those currently attending the school district):
Please select the closest expected Daily Cash out Amount ($): $1 $2 $3 $6 Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 10c: Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules Will the project include the use of telecommuting or alternative work schedules to reduce the number of commute trips by employees? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Percent of employees to participate in a 9/80 work schedule: 1% 3% 5% 10% 25% Percent of employees to participate in a 4/40 work schedule: 1% 3% 5% 10% 25% Percent of employees to participate in telecommuting 1.5 days: 1% 3% 5% 10% 25% Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other count y or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 10d: Market Commute Trip Reduction Option Will the project implement marketing strategies to reduce commute trips (e.g., new employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode option, event promotions, publications)? This measure should promote and educate employees on alternative transportation options No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of Employees Eligible:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 10e: Employee Vanpool/Shuttle
Will this project implement an employer-sponsored vanpool or shuttle? Employer-sponsored vanpool programs entail an employer purchasing or leasing vans for employee use, and often subsidizing the cost of at lease program administration, if not more. Rider charges are normally set on th e basis of vehicle and operating cost.
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of employees participating in the vanpool program:
% of vehicles for vanpooling:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use a gency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 10f: Provide Ride Sharing Program
Will the project include a ride-sharing program?
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
% of Employees participating in the ride-sharing program:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Central Region Office: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave. Fresno, CA 93726-0244 TEL (559) 230-6000 www.valleyair.org/ISR
Mitigation Measure 11: Hearth
Will the project include any woodstoves or fireplaces?
No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Only natural gas hearth
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal code s, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Mitigation Measure 12: Exceed Title 24
Will the energy efficiency rating of the project’s building(s) be greater than California Title 24 requirements? No, please complete justification in Section M above
Yes, please complete section below:
Percent of increase greater than California Title 24 requirements:
Will this mitigation measure be required as a condition of approval by the land use agency, by other county or municipal codes, or other?
No, (note: if checked “no” this mitigation measure will require District enforcement) Yes, Name of enforcing agency:
Source of Requirement:
Documentation: Please attach relevant analysis or summary pages of Title 24 documentation. Attached
City of
EEDECITTS\12fnE=lEzzrtrs- Planning & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street-Third Floor
Fresno, California 93721-3604
(55e) 621-8277
Letter of Owner Authorization
Name and Address of Owner(s) of the Property
Name: Robert Golden, CEO, Golden Opportunity Legacy Development, LLC Jennifer K. Glark, AICP, HDFP
Director
Address: 1626 W. Princeton Ave.
City: Fresno
Phone: (559) 293-3157
To Whom lt May Concern:
As owner(s) of the property located at
l/we authorize DanZack
Development Permit
Planned Development Permit
Lot Merger
Sincerely,
State: CA Zip Code: 93705
Email : [email protected]
741W. Belmont Ave.
to act as Agent for the following permits:
Robert Golden,
Owner's Signature
6K
,,
f" zs
Date
February 1, 2024
Brittany Martin
City of Fresno
Development and Resource Management Department
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043
Fresno, CA 93721
Project: Development Permit Application No. P23-03784
District CEQA Reference No: 20240073
Dear Ms. Martin,
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Development Permit (DP) from the City of Fresno (City) for the above project. Per the DP, the project consists of the construction of a new Fresno Unified School District K – 8 Charter School, on 2.35 total acres, made up of 19 classrooms at 34,499 square feet (Project). The Project is located at 741 West Belmont Avenue in Fresno, CA. The Project lies within one of the communities in the state selected by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for investment of additional air quality resources and attention under Assembly Bill (AB) 617 (Garcia) in an effort to reduce air pollution exposure in impacted disadvantaged communities.
The District offers the following comments at this time regarding the Project:
Assembly Bill 617
AB 617 requires CARB and air districts to develop and implement Community Emission Reduction Programs (CERPs) in an effort to reduce air pollution exposure in impacted disadvantaged communities, like those in which the Project is located.
The South Central Fresno AB 617 community is one of the statewide communities selected by CARB for development and implementation of a CERP.
Following extensive community engagement and collaboration with the Community Steering Committee, the CERP for the South Central Fresno Community was adopted by the District’s Governing Board in September 2019 and by CARB in February 2020.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 2 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
During the development of the CERP, the Community Steering Committee expressed concerns regarding the proximity of emission sources to nearby sensitive receptors like schools, homes, day care centers, and hospitals, and the potential future industrial development within the community that may exacerbate the cumulative exposure burden for community residents. The Community Steering Committee also expressed the desire for more meaningful avenues of engagement surrounding the land-use decisions in the area. As these issues can most effectively be addressed through strong partnerships between community members and local land-use agencies. Furthermore, the District recommends the City assess the emission reductions measures and strategies included in the CERP and address them in the environmental assessment, as appropriate, to align the City work with the air pollution and exposure reduction strategies and measures outlined in the CERP.
For more information regarding the CERP approved for South Central, please visit the District’s website at:
http://community.valleyair.org/selected-communities/south-central-fresno
Project Related Emissions
At the federal level under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the District is designated as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standards and serious nonattainment for the particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) standards. At the state level under California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), the District is designated as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 standards.
Based on information provided to the District, Project specific annual criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operation are not expected to exceed any of the significance thresholds as identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI):
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.
Construction Emissions
The District recommends, to reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the Project should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.
Health Risk Screening/Assessment
The City should evaluate the risk associated with the Project for sensitive receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) in the area and mitigate any potentially significant risk to help limit exposure of sensitive receptors to emissions.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 3 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
To determine potential health impacts on surrounding receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) a Prioritization and/or a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be performed for the Project. These health risk determinations should quantify and characterize potential Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Air Resources Board (OEHHA/CARB) that pose a present or potential hazard to human health.
Health risk analyses should include all potential air emissions from the project, which include emissions from construction of the project, including multi-year construction, as well as ongoing operational activities of the project. Note, two common sources of TACs can be attributed to diesel exhaust emitted from heavy-duty off-road earth moving equipment during construction, and from ongoing operation of heavy-duty on-road trucks.
Prioritization (Screening Health Risk Assessment):
A “Prioritization” is the recommended method for a conservative screening-level health risk assessment. The Prioritization should be performed using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) methodology. Please contact the District for assistance with performing a Prioritization analysis.
The District recommends that a more refined analysis, in the form of an HRA, be performed for any project resulting in a Prioritization score of 10 or greater. This is because the prioritization results are a conservative health risk representation, while the detailed HRA provides a more accurate health risk evaluation.
Health Risk Assessment:
Prior to performing an HRA, it is strongly recommended that land use agencies/ project proponents develop and submit for District review a health risk modeling protocol that outlines the sources and methodologies that will be used to perform the HRA.
A development project would be considered to have a potentially significant health risk if the HRA demonstrates that the health impacts would exceed the District’s established risk thresholds, which can be found here:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.
A project with a significant health risk would trigger all feasible mitigation measures.
The District strongly recommends that development projects that result in a significant health risk not be approved by the land use agency.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 4 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
The District is available to review HRA protocols and analyses. For HRA submittals please provide the following information electronically to the District for review:
HRA (AERMOD) modeling files
HARP2 files
Summary of emissions source locations, emissions rates, and emission factor calculations and methodologies.
For assistance, please contact the District’s Technical Services Department by:
E-Mailing inquiries to: [email protected]
Calling (559) 230-5900
Recommended Measure: Development projects resulting in TAC emissions should be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors to prevent the creation of a significant health risk in accordance to CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective located at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/resource-center/strategy- development/land-use-resources.
Ambient Air Quality Analysis
An Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA) uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emissions increases from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The District recommends an AAQA be performed for the Project if emissions exceed 100 pounds per day of any pollutant.
An AAQA uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emission increase from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambien Air Quality Standards. An acceptable analysis would include emissions from both project- specific permitted and non-permitted equipment and activities. The District recommends consultation with District staff to determine the appropriate model and input data to use in the analysis.
Specific information for assessing significance, including screening tools and modeling guidance, is available online at the District’s website:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.
Vegetative Barriers and Urban Greening
There are single-family residential units surrounding the Project, in addition to the Fresno Chaffee Zoo, which is north of the Project. The District suggests the City consider the feasibility of incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 5 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units, Zoo).
While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, vegetative barriers have been shown to be an additional measure to potentially reduce a population’s exposure to air pollution through the interception of airborne particles and the update of gaseous pollutants. Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.
Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment in the Community
Since the Project consists of educational development, gas-powered educational lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits. The District recommends the Project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment. More information on the District CGYM program and funding can be found at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/grants/zero-emission- landscaping-equipment-voucher-program/.
On-Site Solar Deployment
It is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zero- carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The District suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for the Project.
District Rules and Regulations
The District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 6 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes.
The list of rules below is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. Current District rules can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/rules-and-planning/current-district-rules- and-regulations/. To identify other District rules or regulations that apply to future projects, or to obtain information about District permit requirements, the project proponents are strongly encouraged to contact the District’s Small Business Assistance (SBA) Office at (559) 230-5888.
District Rules 2010 and 2201 - Air Quality Permitting for Stationary Sources
Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using Best Available Control Technology (BACT).
This Project may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, the Project proponent should submit to the District an application for an ATC. For further information or assistance, the project proponent may contact the District’s SBA Office at (559) 230-5888.
District Rule 9510 - Indirect Source Review (ISR)
The Project is subject to District Rule 9510 because it will receive a project- level discretionary approval from a public agency and will equal or exceed 9,000 square feet of educational development.
The purpose of District Rule 9510 is to reduce the growth in both NOx and PM emissions associated with development and transportation projects from mobile and area sources; specifically, the emissions associated with the construction and subsequent operation of development projects. The ISR Rule requires developers to mitigate their NOx and PM emissions by incorporating clean air design elements into their projects. Should the proposed development project clean air design elements be insufficient to meet the required emission reductions, developers must pay a fee that ultimately funds incentive projects to achieve off-site emissions reductions.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 7 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
Per Section 5.0 of the ISR Rule, an Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application is required to be submitted no later than applying for project-level approval from a public agency. As of the date of this letter, the District has not received an AIA application for this Project. Please inform the project proponent to immediately submit an AIA application to the District to comply with District Rule 9510 so that proper mitigation and clean air design under ISR can be incorporated into the Project’s design.
Information about how to comply with District Rule 9510 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview
The AIA application form can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview/forms- and-applications/
District staff is available to provide assistance and can be reached by phone at (559) 230-5900 or by email at [email protected].
District Rule 4002 (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)
In the event an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed, the Project may be subject to District Rule 4002. This rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility is demolished or renovated. Information on how to comply with District Rule
4002 can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/demolition- renovation/
District Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings)
The Project may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it may utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs.
The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings.
In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements. Additional information on how to comply with District Rule 4601 requirements can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/tkgjeusd/rule-4601.pdf
District Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)
The project proponent may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving activities as described in Regulation VIII, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 8 of 8 District Reference No: 20240073
February 1, 2024
specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities.
Should the project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5- acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). For additional information regarding the written notification or Dust Control Plan requirements, please contact District Compliance staff at (559) 230-5950.
The application for both the Construction Notification and Dust Control Plan can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/fm3jrbsq/dcp-form.docx
Information about District Regulation VIII can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/dustcontrol
Other District Rules and Regulations
The Project may also be subject to the following District rules: Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).
District Comment Letter
The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Dylan Casares by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (559) 230-2374.
Sincerely,
Brian Clements
Director of Permit Services
For: Mark Montelongo
Program Manager
PROJECT LOCATION
741 E Belmont Ave
PROJECT LOCATION
EXISTING CONDITIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
W BELMONT AVENUE
N PACIFIC AVENUE
N DELNO AVENUE
FRESNO
CHAFFEE
ZOO
SCHOOL PLAYFIELD
ADMIN
CLASSROOMS
11 -16
KINDERGARTEN
/TRANSITIONAL
KINDERGARTEN
CLASSROOMS
3-4
KINDERGARTEN
/TRANSITIONAL
KINDERGARTEN
CLASSROOMS
1-2
CLASSROOMS
1-6
CLASSROOMS
7-10
PL: 589'
PL: 123'
PL: 129.95'
PL: 135'
PL: 450'
APN #: 45812117
APN #: 45812119
NOT PROJECT SITE
1 2
27 15
15 19
17 13
22 12 12 12 12 14 14 14
12 11
14 14
14 32
21 15
22 BUILDING 'A'
BUILDING 'C'
BUILDING 'B'
20 ZONE: NMX
(NEIGHBORHOOD MIX USE)
14 14
BUILDING
'C'
CLASSROOM
17 14 14 14
3 4
7 6
24 54
4 7
4 9
9 43
25 26
3 7
4 5
14 18
23 44
4 5
4 5
5 5 5
4 5
4 9
9 9
8 5
8 5
8 8
4 4 4
12 12
9 9
5 EVCS
EV
CAPA -
BLE
EV
CAPA -
BLE
EV
CAPA -
BLE
EV
CAPA -
BLE
EV
CAPA -
BLE
EV
CAPA -
BLE
EVCS
21 27
30 33
31 21
31 PL: 124.95'
PL: 140'
30.30' 20.03'
30'
42' 30'
30'
EXISTING CONCRETE PUBLIC WALKWAY
ASPHALT PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
TURF/LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS
PROPERTY LINE
BUILDING 'A' (NEW CONSTRUCTION)
BUILDING 'B' (NEW CONSTRUCTION)
BUILDING 'C' (NEW CONSTRUCTION)
ROOF LINE
EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING
SECTION LINE
(a) NON-SEPARATED OCCUPANCY TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 508.3 AND
FOLLOW THE MOST RESTRICTIVE OCCUPANCY ALLOWANCES
(b) BUILDINGS CONSIDERED TO BE ONE BUILDING
PARKING SUMMARY
PARKING
LOT
TOTAL
PARKING
SPACES
ACCESSIBLE STALLS
PER CBC TABLE
11B-208.2
A 33 2 (1 VAN)
EV CHARGING STATION
PER CALGREEN TABLE
5.106.5.3.1
2 EV CAPABLE SPACES
(INC. EVCS) PER
CALGREEN TABLE
5.106.5.3.1
8 ACCESSIBLE EVCS PER
CBC 11B-228.3
1 VAN
BUILDING SUMMARY
BUILDING
DESIGNATION
BUILDING
USE/NAME
OCCUPANCY
CLASSIFICATION
CBC CHAPTER 3
CONSTRUCTION
TYPE
CBC TABLE 601
ACTUAL BLDG.
FLOOR AREA (SF)
ACTUAL BLDG.
ROOF O/H AREA
ALLOWABLE AREA
CBC TABLE 506.2
ACTUAL
HEIGHT
ALLOWABLE HEIGHT
CBC TABLE 504.3
OCCUPANCY
SEPARATION
CBC TABLE 508.4
BUILDING
SEPARATION
AUTOMATIC FIRE
SPRINKLERS CBC
SECTION 903.2.19
A
C
ADMIN.
WEST CLASSROOM WING
MPR
EAST CLASSROOM WING
B
E
A-3
E
V-B
V-B
7,190
+ 5,490
= 12,680
14,444
TOTAL BUILDING
AREA W/ O/H
36,000
38,000
26,000
38,000
24' - 5"
21' - 6"
60 60
60 60
NO
(a)
(a)
YES
YES YES
NO
1,795
+ 2,142
= 3,937
8,985
+ 7,637
= 16,622
1,417 15,861
B NORTH CLASSROOM WING E 38,000 18' - 4" 60 YES N/A
NO
(b)
(b)
CODE COMPLIANCE
REQUIRED
2 (1 VAN) 2 8PROVIDED 1 VAN
L
ICE NS E D A R CH IT E
T
F C I F O
S
T
E
O A L
R N
IAT
A
C-16824
A
R
T
HU R
32 8220
N.
R RE
D Y
S
O
N
C
11901 Golden Charter Academy
1295 N. Wishon Ave., Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93728
Phone 559.497.6370
Fax 559.486.4909
Web: dysonjanzen.com
Arthur Dyson
Architect
F.A.I.A.
C-16824
Douglas K. Janzen
architecture
planning
interiors
R.A.
Architect C-14260
Dyson Janzen
Architects, Inc.
REVISIONS BY
Scale:
Drawn:
Sheet Number
741 W Belmont Ave., Fresno, CA 93728
Date:
Job:
As indicated
09/19/2023
BR/MR/AJ