Fresno City Council
December 5, 2024

From:

To: ; Clerk
Cc:

Subject: COMMENTS: 12/5/24 - ID 24-1571: South Central Specific Plan Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 9:02:52 AM
Attachments: 12.4.24 - INVEST Fresno - SCSP NASCAR Letter.pdf External Email: Use caution with links and attachments
Good morning, Clerk Stermer:

I write today on behalf of INVEST Fresno and the undersigned organizations and businesses to express our strong concern with and opposition to the South Central Specific Plan (SCSP) and the related Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).

We respectfully request the Council direct staff to amend the SCSP to better reflect input received from various property owners, business owners, operators, investors, and others outlined in previous public testimony and the letter below to encourage economic development, continued growth, and ensure that Fresno can continue to thrive for generations to come.

We appreciate your time and consideration. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any thoughts or questions. We look forward to working with

the
Council
and staff to keep Fresno’s economy moving.

Thank you,
--
Ben Granholm
Executive Director
INVEST Fresno

1 December 4, 2024

Annalisa Perea, President Submitted Electronically
City Council
City of Fresno
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065
Fresno, CA 93721

RE: ID 24-1571 - South Central Specific Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report

Dear Council President Perea and Council:

I write today on behalf of INVEST Fresno and the undersigned organizations and businesses to express our strong concern with and opposition to the South Central Specific Plan (SCSP) and the related Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).

2 We respectfully request the Council direct staff to amend the SCSP to better reflect input received from various property owners, business owners, operators, investors, and others outlined in previous public testimony and the letter below to encourage economic development, continued growth, and ensure that Fresno can continue to thrive for generations to come.

INVEST Fresno is aligned in our position with the letter and recommendations submitted by John Kinsey, with Wanger Jones Helsley PC.

With the understanding that the status quo has created a defacto-moratorium on development in South Fresno and is not a suitable solution for continued growth and economic development within the city.

We are committed to working with the Council and staff to develop a plan that respects and meets the needs of existing businesses and property owners and facilitates the ability of the city to attract new businesses and industries while also providing mitigation.

As currently proposed, the SCSP contains several provisions that are highly concerning to the continued operation and future expansion of existing businesses in South Central Fresno, including, but not limited to, the downzoning of various properties, the inclusion of 1,000-foot buffer zones, and onerous mitigation requirements. The consequences of these changes could destroy living wage jobs and significantly reduce vital tax revenue in Fresno.

DOWNZONING
The SCSP proposes downzoning numerous properties from Heavy Industrial to Light Industrial and other properties from Light Industrial to Business Park, Regional Business Park, or even residential. The proposed downzoning will have wide- ranging impacts on the current and future operations of existing businesses as well as the ability of Fresno to attract new businesses.

Downzoning severely affects landowners and employers by making their properties inconsistent with the new zoning regulations. This change reduces Fresno’s attractiveness to reputable and well-capitalized businesses who want to invest in Fresno. Rezoning that creates non-conformities makes obtaining conventional financing nearly impossible — impacting capital improvements necessary for maintenance, beautification, and clean energy upgrades.

Legal non-conforming uses make it incredibly difficult for landowners to change tenants even in favorable conditions, and during an economic downturn, it almost guarantees the loss of legal non-conforming status. Additionally, landowners cannot switch from one legal non-conforming use to another. Any enlargement of a legal non-conforming use requires a conditional use permit (CUP), which hampers the ability to attract reputable, national industrial tenants, and further reduces the potential to re-let industrial properties.

Additionally, the proposed downzoning throughout the plan would be devastating to Fresno’s manufacturing sector. The Central Valley has long prided itself in being an epicenter for career-technical and vocational education and workforce development.

3 The State Center Community College District has invested hundreds of millions to ensure thousands of students each year receive the hands-on education and skill training local employers need. Limiting the growth of these businesses not only reduces the opportunities for these graduates but directly affects the future of Fresno’s workforce and the city’s economy.

BUFFER ZONES
The inclusion of 1,000-foot buffer zones in the SCSP is quite alarming. The proposed downzoning of numerous properties, combined with the proposed buffer zones, results in nearly 50% of the SCSP area being impacted by and subject to the proposed onerous requirements.

The buffers would prohibit certain warehousing and distribution activities, such as chemical and mineral storage and freight/truck terminals, and reclassify other activities, including "Limited Industrial" and most warehousing and distribution uses, as conditional uses. Additionally, Health Risk Assessments would be required for all industrial processes, construction, and operations of businesses, regardless of the land use intensity or the probability of adverse health impacts. This will substantially increase costs and, as a result, drive businesses out of Fresno or drive up prices for consumers.

A 1,000-foot buffer zone is far outside the norm and three times greater than the standard endorsed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta. In 2022, the California Department of Justice reached a settlement agreement with the City of Fontana relative to their approval of warehouse developments, requiring warehouses that are 400,000 square feet or larger to establish a setback of 300 feet from the property line of the nearest sensitive receptor. In a statement announcing the agreement, Attorney General Bonta stated, “… the City of Fontana has adopted the most stringent environmental standards in California for new warehouse projects. This ordinance should serve as a model for other local governments across the state to build upon.”

Additionally, the 2022 agreement with the City of Stockton required that logistics uses and their associated loading docks are no closer than 300 feet from sensitive receptors. In response to the agreement, California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated, “I hope this serves as a model for future warehouse projects across the state.”

Finally, the California State Legislature has repeatedly rejected recent efforts (AB 1000, Reyes, 2023, and AB 2840, Reyes, 2022), which would have prohibited public agencies in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties from approving the development or expansion of a warehouse of 100,000 square feet or more within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor. Furthermore, the State Legislature recently adopted and the Governor signed AB 98, which, among other things, establishes a 300-foot buffer zone for warehouses of 250,000 square feet or larger. Once again proving that a 1,000-foot buffer zone is far and above the scientifically accepted or reasonable distance from sensitive receptors.

We are currently unaware of any city or county near Fresno that has implemented 1,000-foot buffers. Given the significant demand for industrial development within

4 the city and the limited available locations for such projects, adopting these buffers would likely push new industrial developments—and the jobs and tax revenue they bring—to neighboring municipalities. We cannot support any policy that would jeopardize Fresno's success as an industrial hub or encourage our workforce to relocate.

SCSP ECONOMIC & COMMUNTIY BENEFITS
South Central Fresno is the city's economic engine and delivers an outsize impact for the entire city, while fewer than a quarter of one percent of residents live within the 5,629-acre planning area. In 2022, this area, which represents 7.5% of the city’s land, generated approximately $13 billion in economic activity (35% of the city’s total economic output) and more than $102 million in tax revenue (21% of the city’s general fund). A full breakdown of the SCSP’s economic benefit to the entire city can be found at: INVESTFresnoCA.com/EconomicImpact.

Home to more than 440 businesses, the SCSP directly provides approximately 22,070 full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs and creates nearly 48,000 FTE jobs citywide (25% of the City’s FTE employment). Additionally, the average annual wage for the provided FTE jobs is slightly higher than the rest of the city at $68,000.

In the past six years, Fresno’s new retail distribution economy has taken flight — increasing the city’s sales tax revenue at unprecedented levels. It took the preceding 20 years for Fresno to experience a similar amount of growth in sales tax revenue. Unlike traditional sales tax revenue that is only generated from purchases within the city, Fresno receives sales tax revenue from items that are shipped from local retail distribution centers regardless of whether the shopper lives in Fresno, Los Angeles, or another state.

Source: City of Fresno, FY 2025 Mayors Proposed Budget

Bolstering the city’s General Fund provides benefits for all Fresno residents – all of which support essential city and community services like public safety, parks, infrastructure improvements, and numerous other critical programs that residents rely on every day.

5 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS
Due to the Valley’s topography and meteorology, surrounded by mountains and subject to frequent temperature inversions, pollutants become trapped, and, as a result, cities like Fresno, Visalia, and Bakersfield wind up at the top of the state’s most polluted cities. While ominous, this is not the end of the story.

The primary pollutants of concern in the Central Valley are ground-level ozone, and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), including diesel particulate matter (DPM). Since 1980, the Central Valley has reduced emissions of these pollutants from stationary sources (i.e., oil production and refining, boilers, and other stationary equipment) by 85%. According to the EPA, regulations on mobile sources such as cars and light trucks have reduced emissions by 99 percent since 1970. Heavy-duty trucks are roughly 99 percent cleaner than 1970 models.

Source: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2023 Annual Report

Whereas, Valley residents’ exposure to elevated ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), often cited as one of the most harmful to the lungs, has also fallen by 90% and 85% respectively. In total, this has led to a 95% reduction in cancer risk for Valley residents from exposure to air pollutants according to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.

Source: San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2023 Annual Report

6 These historic reductions in air pollution over the past 40 years were accomplished at the same time Fresno’s population grew 2.5 times larger and our local economy more than doubled in size.

Since 1992, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District has implemented roughly 650 rules and regulations that, along with California’s nation-leading regulations on cars and trucks, are helping to steadily improve the air quality in the Valley.

All this illustrates that the key to clean air and a healthy community is a strong and growing economy.

CONCLUSION
The proposed downzoning, buffer zones, mitigation requirements, and limited protection from legal non-conforming use provisions will result in existing businesses abandoning the city and repel new businesses from entering – along with the countless jobs and significant tax revenue they generate.

A recent public opinion survey commissioned by INVEST Fresno, representative of the voting electorate across all seven council districts, showed overwhelming support for the city’s retail distribution and warehousing business sector. 71% of respondents stated they believe retail distribution and warehousing to be a net positive for the local community, with 39% identifying jobs and wages as their top reason for supporting the industry.

Additional findings from the survey can be found at: INVESTFresnoCA.com/Survey.

As the community of Fresno, if we are going to continue the progress we are making and redouble our commitment to raising the standard of living for low- income families, then we must do all that we can to support a diverse and growing economy. A pivot away from a growth-oriented economy here in Fresno would reverse the incredible success our community has seen and risk more families falling into poverty.

A growing economy and sensible air quality regulations have to work in tandem.

The transition to zero-emission heavy-duty trucks cannot be achieved if policies are enacted that discourage and limit Fresno’s economic growth, which is necessary to afford this new technology.

7 In short, neither the status quo nor the SCSP are tenable solutions. As a result, the City Council should not just deny the SCSP as currently proposed, but also provide clear direction to staff to actively work with industry and residents to develop a plan that will not jeopardize the City’s competitiveness, but facilitate a strong and diverse economy, including:

• Ensure that changes in zoning and land use designation will not occur absent the consent of the underlying landowners.

• Ensure that the city does not expand or impose mandates that are more burdensome than California’s already aggressive and conservative laws and regulations relating to the establishment of buffer areas and electric fleet mandates such as AB 98 and CARB’s Advanced Clean Fleet regulation.

• To the extent there are concerns regarding specific communities or sensitive receptors within the South Central area, staff should evaluate solutions targeted to that specific community/sensitive receptor as opposed to a one- size-fits-all approach that would negatively affect business without providing objective or tangible outcomes.

• Identifying infrastructure and other improvements that will lift up the South Central community, and directly improve the quality of life for South Central residents, including parks, air filters, roadway enhancements, etc.

We appreciate your time and consideration and respectfully urge the Council to reject the SCSP as currently proposed and direct staff to amend the SCSP to better reflect input received from various property owners, business owners, operators, investors, and others as outlined above.

The city should look to implement policies that support and encourage investment in Fresno’s infrastructure that result in community improvement, encourage economic development, and ensure that Fresno can continue to thrive for generations to come.

If you would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact Ben Granholm at [email protected]. We look forward to working with you and staff to help keep Fresno’s economy moving.

Sincerely,

Ben Granholm
INVEST Fresno

Advanced Emission Control Solutions, LP
Betts Company
Buzz Oates
Cedar Avenue Recycling & Transfer Station
Central Valley Business Federation
Certified Meat Products
Cossette Investment Company, Inc.

Cushman & Wakefield
Don Pickett & Associates
Diversified Development Group

8 Fowler Packing
Fresno Business Council
Fresno Chamber of Commerce
Fresno County Farm Bureau
JD Food
La Tapatia Tortilleria, Inc.

Legacy Construction
Newmark Pearson Commercial
North Pointe Business Park
Pickett Solar
Precision Civil Engineering, Inc.

Robert V. Jensen, Inc.

San Joaquin Valley Manufacturing Alliance
Strategic Freight Network
Sunnyland Mills
Tank Specialties of California
Valley Iron, Inc.

Valley Wide Beverage

cc: Jerry Dyer, Mayor
Georgeanne White, City Manager
Councilmembers, City of Fresno

From:

To: C
Cc:

Subject: December 5, 2024 Hearing on South Central Specific Plan Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 9:04:47 AM
Attachments: Letter to the Fresno City Council regarding December 5,. 2024 Hearing on South Central Specific Plan.pdf External Email: Use caution with links and attachments
Good Morning,

Please see the attached correspondence of today’s date.

Thank you,
Hannah N. Wilhelm
Legal Assistant/Paralegal to:

John P. Kinsey
Nicolas R. Cardella
Hunter C. Castro
Kathleen DeVaney
Wanger Jones Helsley PC
.

Fresno, CA 93720

This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.

For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com

From:

Agendas
Cc:

Subject: Agenda Item 1 - South Central Specific Plan Comments Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 3:08:25 PM
From: Leslie Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2024 2:25 PM
To: Gabriela Olea Karla Martinez-Arias
Subject: Agenda Item 1 - South Central Specific Plan Comments

External Email: Use caution with links and attachments

Bertha Castillo
We're here to support our neighbors and the environmental impacts they feel, and they also impact us.

There's enough contamination. Have compassion for our children. They have asthma, cancer, and the truth is that their future is not going to be great.

My grandchildren have asthma, my neighbors have cancer, and I wish everything was different for our children, it’s important for our community.

Fermin Salas
It seems like we get 60-70% going to the southwest or southeast. I want to know who’s got the power, It is a mess up over there.

We need the businesses, and I understand what some of these people are saying, that Fresno needs businesses because we’re in the middle of Los Angeles and San Francisco.

We need more work too, a lot of people need work. I’m just going to say, why can’t we spread the health around, spread the wealth around, to that side and that side, why?

Why can’t we do it? Who has the power to do it?

Martha Leon
I have asthma, and so does my daughter and her son. And it has to be because there are just so many trucks, there's so much heavy truck traffic.

I go with her to Clovis for therapy, and it's a different life. Because when I go there it's another air that you breathe.

And I would like to live a little longer, so that I can spend time with my grandkids. Thank

you.

--
Leslie Martinez (she/her)
Community Engagement Specialist
Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability

From:

To:

Cc:

Subject: Agenda Item 1 -ID 24-1571 (SCSP)
Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 12:51:07 PM
Attachments: Katie Taylor SCSP DEIR Comment - Letter Version.docx External Email: Use caution with links and attachments
Please see the

attached

letter to be entered into the record on behalf of Ms. Katie Taylor.

--
Leslie Martinez (she/her)
Community Engagement Specialist
Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability

Sophia Pagoulatos
Planning Manager
City of Fresno
Planning and Development Department
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065
Fresno, CA 93721

Re: Fresno South Central Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2019079022)

Dear Ms. Pagoulatos,

My name is Katie Taylor. I am 78 years old and a resident of Fresno, California. For over fifty years, I have lived and raised my family on Central Avenue, near its intersection with Orange Avenue. My home is located within the area of the proposed South Central Specific Plan.

The street I live on is a frontage road. There is a water canal that separates the frontage road from the main portion of Central Avenue. Trucks are not supposed to be on the frontage road, but they are anyway. When trucks come off the freeway on their way to industrial facilities all around South Central Fresno, the frontage road is easier for them to get to. My street is supposed to be residential, but the heavy duty trucks drive by constantly, just 16 feet from my doorstep.

My neighborhood has seen a substantial increase in heavy truck traffic over the past few years, as the City and County have allowed large industrial warehouses to be built right next door. In 2017, The Amazon Fulfillment Center was constructed across the street from my house.

The same year, the Ulta Beauty distribution center was built less than half a mile away. There are other large facilities near my house, including the FedEx terminal. Several other truck terminals and truck stops have been built around my neighborhood in the last few years as well. There is a truck driving school roughly 50-100 feet from my house. The truck school has become a lot more active than it was before the warehouses and facilities came in.

My neighborhood is an unacknowledged cancer cluster. My husband, daughter, and my son have all passed away from cancer. Nearly every home along my road has had someone who has died of or is currently fighting cancer. I have a heart condition and thyroid problems. I have allergies as well. My allergies have gotten worse since the warehouses were built. Some of my neighbors' children have asthma, which they say has gotten worse.

Trucks travel to and from the facilities and warehouses 24 hours a day, seven days week.

I can hear a loud rumbling from the trucks at all hours of the day and night, and the vibrations from the trucks shake my house. People who come visit my house are shocked by how much truck traffic there is now. The noise from the trucks is so loud that it is sometimes hard to hear my visitors talking. I also have a hard time falling asleep because of the noise. About twice a night I’ll get up because there’s a loud sound, almost like there’s someone knocking on my door.

But it’s just a truck at the stop sign waiting to go. I’ve talked to other neighbors, and they’ve said the same thing.

With the heavy duty trucks passing by so close to my house and so often, I feel very unsafe. People I know that walk around the neighborhood have to be very careful because of the traffic. My daughter has down syndrome and autism, and I have to make sure she doesn’t go outside because it isn’t safe for her. Even when I’m driving, I’m worried about traffic safety. I have noticed more traffic accidents since the warehouses came in. Some of the Amazon employees drive very recklessly, coming off of long shifts and trying to get home as soon as possible. I know when the main Amazon shifts end; I avoid being on the road at those times.

The trucks going to and from the facilities also create a lot of dust and fumes, which cover my house and car constantly. I have to clean the dust off the windows of my house and car almost every day. The dust also seeps into my house through cracks in my doors and windows.

My neighbors complain about the dust getting inside their houses too.

Traffic lights were put up at the intersection of Central and Orange when the Amazon warehouse was constructed. The lights are very bright and blink continuously. They shine into my windows, which disrupts my sleep. The constant flashing of the traffic lights is very disturbing for my daughter because of her condition.

I have noticed that my neighborhood has become hotter since the warehouses were constructed, including during the night. I am forced to use my air conditioning more, which increases my energy bill. My neighbors have also noticed that it is hotter, that the neighborhood does not seem to cool down as much in the evening as it used to, and that they have to use their air conditioners more.

The water pressure at my house dropped a few years ago, and I had to get a water tank. I also found out that my tap water was contaminated. One of my family members tested the water and found that it was not safe to drink. A person from UC Davis came and tested my water too and told me not to drink it because of the contamination.

I am worried that the value of my house has gone down because of the warehouses and other facilities. I believe that the value of my neighbors' houses has gone down too. This really hurts us because we do not have very much money. My home is my main source of wealth, and we are trying to pass our homes down to our kids to help support them economically.

When my neighbors and I have talked to the City and the developers, we tell them about the noise, dust, traffic, health problems, lowered property values, and other impacts from the warehouses and other industrial projects. But they ignore us and keep building projects here without even notifying us first. We didn’t even know Amazon was coming. When the orchard trees across the street first started getting plowed, I thought the owners were just going to plant more fruit trees. I had no idea they were cutting down the fruit trees for a warehouse.

Sometimes the City does send out a notice for a meeting, but often without giving residents enough time to respond. People need time to prepare for meetings. In this community, people are doing farm work. They can’t just get off their jobs at a moment’s notice.

The traffic, noise, dust, health, and other impacts from the facilities have caused me to suffer from a significant amount of stress and anxiety. For example, the abrupt loud noises and flashing lights are very unnerving and stressful. The heavy traffic from cars and trucks makes me constantly worry about my family's safety. My daughter has also said that she worries about the traffic, noise, and other impacts from the facilities.

The South Central Specific Plan zones my home catty corner from heavy industrial uses.

It also replaces much of the remaining farmland around us with other industrial or business park uses. I am very concerned that increased warehousing, industrial development, and traffic under the South Central Specific Plan will intensify the safety issues and noise, light, and air pollution that my family and community already face every day.

I am aware that the City has drafted a Truck Reroute Study. However, this study is not going to help us. One of the existing and proposed truck routes in the Truck Reroute Study runs down Orange Avenue to Central Avenue—the intersection where I live. Neither the South Central Specific Plan nor Truck Reroute Study give my community any reprieve from the heavy truck traffic and related impacts that we’re dealing with. In fact, the impacts will only get worse, especially when the effects of the South Central Specific Plan and Truck Reroute Study are combined.

It feels like we are not being heard. It feels like the City and County are bullying us—like we are being targeted because of our race and because we do not have a lot of money. I understand that people have to work, but it’s unfair for the industrial development to keep happening right in our neighborhood. We have our little homes out here; they’re not grandiose.

Nevertheless, we have our community, our families, our functions. We just want that to stay intact.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Ms. Katie Taylor

From:

To:

Cc:

Subject: Agenda Item 1 - SCSP
Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 3:07:07 PM
Attachments: SCSP.pdf
From: Leslie Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2024 2:23 PM
To: Clerk Karla Martinez-Arias Gabriela
Olea
Subject: Agenda Item 1 - SCSP

External Email: Use caution with links and attachments

Please see attached. comment for SCSP from Lilia Becerill.

--
Leslie Martinez (she/her)
Community Engagement Specialist
Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability

December 3, 2024
Submittedviaemail [email protected]. President AnnalisaPereaCityCouncil2600FresnoStreetFresno, CA93721 RE: AgendaItem1- SouthCentral SpecificPlan
Dear President Perea,
Thankyoufor theopportunitytocomment ontheSCSP.

FamiliesinAccionisalocal nonprofit communityorganizationworkingtoensurethat SouthFresnoneighborhoodsandfamilieshavethetoolsandresourcestheyneedtolivehappyandhealthylives. Weworktirelesslytoensurethat familiesareconnectedtoresourcesanddevelopleadershipskillstobetter serveandadvocatefor their communities' needs.

SincewearebasedinSoutheast Fresno, wearekeenlyawareof theimpactsof industrializationandpoor landusedecisionsoncommunities. Our communitiesbear thebrunt of theenvironmental effectsonour bodies. Wesuffer fromasthma, allergies, cancer, lungproblems,andthemental stressof trucksdrivingnear us, our jobsarelowpaying, andwelackgreenspaces. Westronglybelievethat thisplandoesnot doenoughtoprotect theschool childrenandfamiliesof SouthCentral andthelungsof our entirecity. Wehavetheworst air inthecountryandplansthat lookfor waystobringmorepollutionintoour cityhavenoplaceinSouthFresno.

Fresnoshouldnot allowANYpollutinglandusenear OrangeCenter ElementarySchool. ThelandaroundOrangeCenter ElementarySchool shouldnot beusedtobringinmorepollutionthat will affect thesurroundinghomesandplacesof worshipbecausewhat affectsthemaffectsus. Asneighbors, weunderstandthat airbornepollutantstravel for miles, andfamiliesinSoutheast Fresnoresidentswill beimpactedtoo.

Werequest that thecouncil direct staff togobackintothecommunityanddevelopaplanthatprioritizesthehealthof SouthCentral andaddressesdecadesof environmental racism.

InsolidaritywithSouthCentral,
LiliaBecerillFounder andDirectorFamiliasenAccion

From:

To:

Subject: Agenda Item 1 - SCSP
Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 3:09:23 PM
From: Leslie Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2024 2:41 PM
To: Gabriela Olea ; Karla Martinez-Arias
Clerk
Subject: Agenda Item 1 - SCSP

External Email: Use caution with links and attachments

Panfilo Cerillo is unable to attend as he is at a conference on behalf of Orange Center Elementary

I’m here to talk to you a little bit about how all this industrial development has affected us as a people, as a community, as fathers, as grandparents, as students of Orange Center School. I heard a few people mention that their families have generations living in the area.

So does my family. And, along with that, I think that it's very important to mention that Orange Center School was established in 1838. Now, that's almost 200 years, right? There's a long term tradition there. This school was originally built at its current location for over 500 students, and today we're down to only 269. The biggest part of that is that most of our residential in the area has been gobbled up by industrial commercial properties.

My kids used to walk to Orange Center Elementary School. Right now, the traffic there has gotten so dangerous that the school itself will tell the parents do not allow your children to walk. Please, do not allow your children to walk. They're walking, you're talking about preschool, K through 8, young kids whose lives are just developing having to walk right next to semi trucks. The residents there, their houses shake, the superintendent told me that their office shakes from the rattling of the semi trucks going through there. And here we are on the north and the south side and the entire west side of the school and we're planning industrial development? Now any one of you up there that's sitting there, I guarantee you that you would not want your children attending an elementary school where your kids have to walk and they're walking right next to semi trucks doing 70 miles an hour.

So I'm here to ask that you not only deny this plan, but that you sit back with the residents of the community who have been speaking out for a very long time and asking you to stop this.

--
Leslie Martinez (she/her)

Community Engagement Specialist
Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability

From:

Subject: Comments on November 30 Draft SCSP
Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 8:49:25 AM
Attachments: Comments on November Draft SCSP.pdf
draft SCSP comment letter.pdf
External Email: Use caution with links and attachments
Good Morning,

Please find attached a letter from Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability, regarding comments on the November Draft South Central Specific Plan. Please confirm your receipt of the attached comments for consideration at the regular City Council meeting on December 5, 2024, under Agenda Item 1, ID 24-1571.

- Phoebe
Phoebe Seaton, Co-Director and Attorney at Law
Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability
her

Twitter: @LCJandA

1 December 4, 2024 Submitted via email [email protected] Attention: Sophia Pagoulatos, Planning Manager City of Fresno Planning and Development Department 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065 Fresno, CA 93721 RE: Comments in Response to the November 2024 Draft South Central Specific Plan Dear Ms. Pagoulatos, Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this matter. Unfortunately, adoption and implementation of the November draft of the South Central Specific Plan (November Draft Plan) will have detrimental consequences in an already overburdened community while also denying the community that comprises the South Central Specific Plan planning area (Plan Area) of the amenities and protections it needs to thrive. As several of our comments and recommendations submitted on July 30, 2024 (July 30 Comments) remain unaddressed we incorporate those by reference herein and attach for your reference.1 Based on our work alongside South Central Fresno residents, we submit additional comments for the City’s consideration in response to the November Draft Plan. I. Action by the City of Fresno Planning Commission and City Council is Inconsistent with City Council Resolution 2019-235 As noted in our July 30 Comments, the November Draft Plan - and its consideration by the City Council at this point - remains inconsistent with resolution 2019 -235. The resolution repeatedly emphasizes the City’s intention that SCSP residents inform the SCSP’s policies and land use designations, stating that the plan’s land use policies should be “reflective of community input,” and that residents and stakeholders “shall inform the [SCSP] to the greatest extent feasible, through an inclusive community engagement process.” 1 We have attached the Jul 30, 2024Comment Letter for your reference but have not included the exhibits to that letter. We incorporate by reference herein all attachments and exhibits included with the July 30, 2024 comments.

2 Notably, the resolution calls for review and consideration of the final plan for approval by the advisory committee established upon adoption of the resolution prior to Planning Commission and City Council action at a noticed hearing. To the best of our knowledge, the City did not notice or hold a public meeting of the advisory committee prior to Planning Commission action nor has it noticed a public meeting of the advisory committee for review and approval prior to council action. II. The Draft South Central Specific Plan Will Increase Health and Safety Risks for Residents of the Specific Plan Area The November Draft Plan fails to reflect recommendations included in our July 30 Comments. Of note, in response to a number of concerns regarding the continued concentration of land uses that will lead to increased pollution in the Plan Area, the City simply responds that the proposed land uses are less intensive than the uses in the adopted General Plan. No revisions, modifications, or policies adequately respond to the signatories’ recommendations to lessen the impact of industrial development and associated traffic in the Plan Area within and beyond city limits. A. Concentration and Intensity of Land Uses will Increase Pollution Despite a nominal shift from Industrial Zones to Business Parks and Regional Business Parks throughout much of the Plan Area Business Park and Regional Business Park allow for many - if not most - of the uses allowed in industrial areas including but not limited to warehousing and other facilities that attract truck traffic. Business Park and / or Regional Business Park allows for construction and material yards, custom manufacturing, limited industrial uses, indoor warehousing and storage, outdoor storage, personal storage, wholesaling and distribution, freight / truck terminals and warehouses, light fleet-based services, and agricultural processing.2 These uses will intensify and increase pollution and nuisance in the overburdened neighborhood. We reiterate the recommendations including in our July 30 comments and further recommend that specifically the areas near Orange Center School be rezoned to NMX or a similar designation. B. Overlay Zone and Development Standards still not protective enough While General Industrial, Intense Industrial, and Agricultural Processing uses were added to two of the three classification categories in the proposed overlay zone and building setback standards were clarified, the proposed overlay zone and development standards will still fail to protect the 2 Agricultural processing would require a conditional use permit in Regional Business Park and Business Park zones.

3 health and well-being of the Plan Area residents. We therefore reiterate our recommendations included in our July 30 Comments and we urge, at a very minimum, that the City prohibit all use classifications within 1000 feet of sensitive uses now listed under category three of the overlay zone requiring a conditional use permit. Additionally, we urge the city to require a CUP for any of the following uses in the entire plan area and require public notice and a public hearing prior to CUP approval: general industrial, intense industrial, limited industrial, warehousing, service station, shooting / archery range, salvage and wrecking, freight / truck terminals and warehouses, waste transfer facility, mining and quarrying, motorcycle / riding club, construction and material yards, building materials and services, communications facilities within buildings, and agriculture processing and agricultural services. C. The Draft Plan Fails to Address the Health and Safety Impacts of Vehicular Traffic Despite repeated requests for rerouting truck traffic away from sensitive uses, traffic calming measures, pedestrian and bicyclist safety measures, and investment in basic infrastructure such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, protected bike lanes, streetlights, and crosswalk to ensure the safety of Plan Area residents, the updated draft fails to include enforceable and timely policies and actions to respond to these concerns. In fact, the latest draft eliminates most references to the Truck Reroute Study and HIA, including recommendations with regards to health impacts and pedestrian safety improvements, thereby rendering those recommendations and proposed improvements included in both reports meaningless and calling into question the City’s intention of implementing them through this Specific Plan or otherwise. Furthermore, the limited references to the Truck Reroute Study note that truck routes will be removed from the Plan Area if the City approves an ordinance to shift truck routes. There is no guarantee that the City will adopt such an ordinance. Furthermore, the removal of truck routes does not mean that trucks will not use those roads, especially given the continued zoning for truck magnets in the Plan Area as discussed above. D. Pause Land Use Approvals Until Adoption of Required Development Code Changes, Rezone, and Text Amendment It is not clear what the impact of adoption of the South Central Specific Plan will have between adoption of the Plan and adoption of a rezone and text amendment, both necessary to implement the Plan. To avoid ambiguity and uncertainty in the applicability of the South Central Specific Plan, the City must pause all land use approvals in the Plan Area until adoption of the required rezone and text amendment.

4 III. Recommendation: Don’t Approval of the Draft South Central Specific Plan Until It Reflects the Recommendations of the People Who Live in the Plan Are Consistent with our recommendations included in our July 30 Comments, we urge the City to update the Draft South Central Specific Plan to reflect the recommendations of the people who live and learn in South Central Fresno who continue to work each day for a healthy and thriving neighborhood. The City must not adopt the November Draft Plan as drafted and must instead work with the Advisory Committee and other community leaders to develop a South Central Specific Plan that creates the framework and infrastructure for a safe and sustainable South Central Plan Area. Sincerely, Veronica Garibay Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability 1 July 30, 2024Submitted via [email protected]: Sophia Pagoulatos, Planning ManagerCity of FresnoPlanning and Development Department2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065Fresno, CA 93721RE: Comments in Response to the Draft South Central Specific Plan Dear Ms. Pagoulatos,The undersigned organizations and community members are writing to providecomments to the draft South Central Specific Plan (SCSP). The expansive industrial development proposed in the SCSP will have detrimental consequences in an already overburdened community while also denying the community of the amenities it needs to thrive. The City of Fresno must reassess the recommendations that it will receive and has received from community stakeholders and update the plan to conform with local and state policy goals and mandates and usher in a healthy and robust future for South Central Fresno. I.The South Central Specific Plan Area and Surrounding Neighborhoods Already Suffer Disproportionate Environmental Burdens The SCSP area encompasses and extends up to large swaths of Southwest, South Central, and Southeast Fresno which are home to various communities and neighborhoods and thousands of people. These neighborhoods include Calwa, Malaga Daleville, the Flamingo Mobile Home Park, the Roy and Almy Avenue neighborhoods in West Fresno, the neighborhood along Britten Avenue, the neighborhood located at Drummond and Jensen Avenues in Southeast Fresno, among others, as well as elementary schools, religious facilities, parks, and other sensitive community locations. These neighborhoods are amongst the most environmentally burdened in the entire State of California according to California Environmental Protection’s (EPA) CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool (Attachment 1 CES 4.0 Results Data Dictionary). In fact, the most socio-economically and environmentally burdened census tract in the 8,057 census tracts in California is found in the City of Fresno within the boundary lines of the SCSP. (Attachment 2 2 CES 4.0 Map of census tract 6019001100). The rest of the census tracts within the boundary lines are all found in the top 5% of CalEnviroScreen’s most impacted census tracts across California (see attachment 1). Even further specific evidence has been documented in the recent results of UC Merced’s Health Impact Assessment whose data shows that there are high rates of chronic health conditions correlating with the proximity to truck routes and high polluting sources.1Despite well-documented data demonstrating such disproportionate impact and repeated oral and written comments by community residents living within the plan area, the City proposes a plan that will further exacerbate and entrench environmental impacts. II.The Draft South Central Specific Plan Will Increase Health and Safety Risks for Residents of the Specific Plan Area The draft South Central Specific Plan would continue to facilitate and concentrate intensive and industrial land uses in the SCSP neighborhoods and its implementation will intensify truck traffic, including heavy-duty diesel truck traffic. Additionally, proposed development standards, encompassed in a draft overlay zone, are insufficient to protect sensitive receptors from the deluge of industrial uses and trucks. Industrial uses exacerbate health, safety, and the quality of life in the already overburdened South Central planning area. Some of the impacts of industrial development include pedestrian, bike and road safety, air pollution from diesel and gas combustion along with emissions from breaking and tire deterioration, vibration and noise of passing trucks; light pollution throughout the night interrupting sleep and well-being, and groundwater depletion and degradation.A.Implementation of The South Central Specific Plan Will Increase Industrial Uses In Areas Zoned Industrial, Business Park, and Even General Commercial The Draft SCSP, as currently drafted, will facilitate significant increases in intense and polluting uses near and impacting sensitive receptors. For instance, despite an apparent shift from Industrial Zones to Business Parks and Regional Business Parks throughout much of the plan area, Business Park and Regional Business Park allow for many - if not most - of the uses allowed in industrial areas including but not limited to warehousing and other facilities that attract truck traffic. Business Park and / or Regional Business Park allows for construction and material yards, custom manufacturing, limited industrial uses, indoor warehousing and storage, outdoor storage, personal storage, wholesaling and distribution, freight / truck terminals and warehouses, light fleet-based services, and agricultural processing.2 These uses will intensify and 1 Fresno Community Environmental Health Impact Assessment: https://clc.ucmerced.edu/publications 3 increase pollution and nuisance in the overburdened neighborhood. Even the General Commercial Zone will allow for uses that are not appropriate for areas adjacent to sensitive receptors. On page 58 of the draft SCSP, it states that “The Commercial - General designation allows for a wide range of commercial uses that are not appropriate in other areas because of higher volumes of vehicle traffic and potential adverse impacts on other uses. Examples of allowable uses include: building materials, storage facilities with active storefronts, equipment rental, wholesale businesses, and specialized retail not normally found in shopping centers.” Some of the more intensive uses General Commercial zoning allows include such as building materials and services, construction and material yards, and communications facilities within buildings. Such uses are not allowed in zones more appropriate for residential neighborhoods including Neighborhood Mixed Use. B.Truck Traffic in the Plan Area Will Intensify with Implementation of the Plan The Draft SCSP acknowledges increased traffic as a result of plan implementation but does not identify what share of that increase will be due to heavy duty trucks. The truth is that plan implementation will significantly increase truck traffic by facilitating uses that rely on heavy duty trucks. The Draft SCSP relies on a truck reroute study that is currently pending before City Council. Not only has that reroute study not been adopted, but it will also be an inadequate tool - if adopted - to protect the South Central Plan area from truck traffic, pollution from trucks, and the safety impacts of truck traffic. It is notable - and of great concern - that the Truck Reroute study identifies truck regulated areas designed to limit throughway truck traffic on neighborhood roads - a designation that eludes the vast majority of the South Central planning area. This raises the concern that the truck reroute study will actually push truck traffic to the South Central neighborhoods and leave them even more vulnerable to the impacts of trucks - both those with starting points or end points in the plan area, or those using its roads as thoroughfares. While one important road - Cherry Avenue from Central Avenue to North Avenue - will not be a truck route, sensitive receptors along that route will still be subject to heavy duty truck traffic that services use on or near that road. In short, the truck reroute study, if adopted, will not protect the residents and students who live, play, and study in the South Central planning area from increased truck traffic that implementation of the plan will attract. It also bears noting that the Truck Reroute Study fails to follow the recommendations of the accompanying UC Merced Health Impact Assessment which called for at least a 1,000 foot 2 Agricultural processing would require a conditional use permit in Regional Business Park and Business Park zones. 4 buffer between sensitive receptors and diesel trucks.3 Implementation of the South Central Specific Plan, even with incorporation of the truck reroute study, will guarantee intensification of truck traffic within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors throughout the plan area. C.The Development Standards in the South Central Specific Plan Will Not Protect Sensitive Receptors from Industrial Land Uses.The Draft SCSP includes a proposed overlay zone that will require certain protections and standards to protect sensitive receptors from industrial land uses. Unfortunately, the overlay zone is unclear and ambiguous in parts and does not provide or require the necessary protections to ensure that industrial land uses will not hurt the people living, working, playing, studying, and praying in the SCSP area. Most notably, the proposed overlay zone purports to create a buffer between industrial and otherwise intense land uses and sensitive receptors. The buffer will not do that as it will not preclude warehouses and other industrial uses from nearly neighboring homes and other sensitive receptors. The overlay policies and the buffer zone in particular merely create an illusion of protection, similar to the shift from industrial zoning to business park. 1.The Proposed Overlay Zone is Unclear and Ambiguous The Draft Overlay Zone includes three categories - (1) prohibited uses, (2) uses that are not allowed within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor, and (3) uses that are allowed within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor subject to some conditions, most notably a conditional use permit. The Overlay Zone will not lead to better protections of the residents in the South Central communities because the language of the draft SCSP ensures that there are loopholes to benefit industrial stakeholders so that their planning projects can continue in the same destructive patterns that impact the residents.a.The proposed overlay zone does not appear to address all industrial land uses allowed in the SCSP area Several allowable land uses in the Industrial and Business Park zones are not included in the list of prohibited uses, uses that cannot be within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor, or allowed within 1,000 feet but subject to a conditional use permit. General Industrial, for example, is allowed in industrial zones however it is not included in any of the three categories. Similarly Intense Industrial is allowed in Heavy Industrial zones but is not included in any of the categories identified in the plan. Agricultural processing as well is allowed in Industrial and Business Park zones but it is not included in any of the three categories. It is unclear if these and 3 Fresno Community Environmental Health Impact Assessment: https://clc.ucmerced.edu/publications 5 other industrial uses that are allowed in industrial and business park zones will be subject to any of the requirements in the overlay zone. b.It is unclear how uses that fall in “Category 3” will be treated if they do not meet the conditions required by “Category 3”Several uses are listed in category 3 (uses that can be within 1,000 feet of a sensitive receptor but that require a Conditional Use Permit) are subject to other requirements. It is unclear what rules would apply to those uses if they did not meet the identified requirements, i.e. CARB criteria for zero or near zero emissions. Would these uses be allowed beyond 1,000 feet from a sensitive receptor? Would they simply not be allowed? The development standards are unclear and confusing with respect to several of these uses, including warehousing uses, in category 3. c.The SCSP does not define or accurately describe what criteria near zero or zero emission facilities must meetThe SCSP notes that three types of warehousing, storage, and distribution uses are allowed within the proposed 1,000 feet “buffer” around sensitive uses as long as these uses meet CARB criteria for near zero or zero emission facilities, as defined in CA Sustainable Freight Action Plan (July 2016). However, the state’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan does not appear to include a list of criteria for facilities to be considered zero emission or near-zero emission and neither the SCSP nor the accompanying DEIR provide any details about the required criteria. Thus, the public and decision-makers have no way of understanding how uses would qualify as “zero or near-zero facilities,” reduce emissions, or compare to other warehouses. Moreover, the California Sustainable Freight Action Plan does not define the term “near- zero” so it remains unclear what the SCSP’s use of the term even means and how it can be verified. d.The SCSP recommends set-backs for “industrial uses” but does not define such uses The proposed overlay zone recommends building set back standards for industrial uses but does not provide details about what uses would be subject to this recommendation. Members of the public, developers, and even the City’s decision-makers would be left guessing what uses would be subject to the setback standards. 2. The Proposed Overlay Zone Still Allows Intensive Industrial Uses Near Sensitive Receptors The Overlay Zone does not provide sufficient protection from industrial uses, other intensive land uses, or related truck traffic. It will not prevent the continued environmental 6 degradation of the South Central Specific Plan Area nor will it protect sensitive receptors from polluting land uses. a.Several industrial and otherwise intense land uses will ostensibly be allowed near sensitive receptors Many industrial and otherwise intense land uses will be allowed in very close proximity to sensitive receptors. intense land uses, including but not limited to Motorcycle/Riding Club, Construction and Material Yards, Limited Industrial, Warehousing, Storage, and Distribution: Indoor Warehousing and Storage; Warehousing, Storage, and Distribution: Outdoor Storage; and Warehousing, Storage, and Distribution: and Wholesaling, Storage and Distribution will be allowed as close to 100 feet from a sensitive receptor with a CUP and with few other protections. As has been the case to date, CUPs will be routinely and summarily approved with little public oversight and not public hearing.4 Areas next to sensitive receptors must be properly zoned, and the aforementioned types of classifications should not be permitted even under a CUP. Additionally, as noted above, several uses don’t fall within any of the restrictive categories included in the Overlay Zone and may be allowed within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors. These uses include General Industrial, Intense Industrial, Agricultural Processing, Construction and Material Yards, and Building Materials and Services. These uses could intensify air, water, light, and noise pollution in addition to traffic safety concerns yet appear to be allowed as close as 100 feet from a sensitive receptor. 3. The Proposed Overlay Zone Will not Protect People from The Impacts of Warehousing and Similar Facilities that Attract Truck Traffic The proposed Overlay Zone includes inadequate protections from the impacts of truck traffic servicing warehouses and other industrial uses. The development standards call for truck entries to be oriented away from sensitive receptors unless physically impossible.5 There should be no such exception. If orienting entries and loading docks away from sensitive receptors is not possible, then that particular use is inappropriate. Similarly, the development standards suggest that loading docks and truck entries should be located away from sensitive receptors if feasible.6 Again, there should be no such caveat. It’s critical for health and safety considerations such standards be in place. Finally, the proposed development standards only require a 300 foot buffer 4 City of Fresno Code of Ordinances: Part V, Article 49, Sec. 15-4904 (J)(L). Article 50, Sec. 15-4904 (M) and Table 15-49075 Draft SCSP pg 736 Id 7 for warehouses that are larger than 400,000 square feet.7 Not only is a 300 foot buffer inadequate given the impacts of truck idling and queueing on sensitive receptors, but a standard buffer should not be limited to only massive facilities.D.The Proposed Land Use Plan Does Not Address Existing Needs Including the Beed for Neighborhood Mixed Used Zoning and ParksThe Draft SCSP fails to adequately incorporate recommendations of people who live in the plan area. Residents of the South Central neighborhoods recommended less industrial uses, but also recommended more community-serving amenities, more parks and green space, and more housing. The Plan’s allocation of land for parks falls far short of recommended park space. In fact the draft plan only designates 3 acres for a park and that land is at the far edge of the plan area, leaving the majority of the planning area far from any hope of a park or recreational space. Community members have repeatedly asked for more trees to create a better tree canopy to reduce heat island impacts. Insultingly, the development standards do not require any trees to be planted except for saplings that don’t reach their maturity until 10 years later.Despite a call for more community-serving amenities, housing, and pedestrian-friendly retail opportunities that would best be fulfilled through Neighborhood Mixed Use zoning, there is virtually no such zoning in the entire plan area. Instead the plan allocates almost all non-residential uses to industrial and business park zones along with some General Commercial zones which the draft plan itself describes on page 56 as not necessarily compatible with “other areas because of higher volumes of vehicle traffic and potential adverse impacts on other uses”. Unfortunately, despite the articulated desire for more housing and mixed use development in the area, including near Orange Center Elementary school, residents are seeing more and more land gobbled up for industrial uses, making residential development more and more untenable. This plan could reverse that harmful trend if corrected. E.The proposed land use and circulation plan does not protect the safety of pedestrians and cyclists in the plan region. Community residents have consistently and repeatedly voiced their concerns about the lack of safety for pedestrians and cyclists in the SCSP area as a result of significant heavy duty truck and employee traffic from distribution and industrial facilities in the plan area. In fact, the SCSP notes that “there are many locations that lack bikeways and sidewalks or that have 7 Draft SCSP pg 73 Developmental Regulation 8 sidewalks gaps between development” and goes on to state that “inconsistent bicycle and pedestrian networks contribute to an unsafe and uninviting environment for pedestrians and cyclists.”8While the SCSP states that it incorporates relevant portions of multiple transportation planning documents and identifies planned bicycle, trail, and sidewalk networks, it completely fails to identify how planned network investments will actually be funded and fully realized. Furthermore, SCSP does not commit to or identify any actions the City will take to ensure timely implementation in the circulation or implementation chapters of the SCSP. It excuses any commitments by noting that improvements can only be made if they are feasible and within city limits with no acknowledgement to address bikeway and sidewalk infrastructure deficiencies for areas within the city's sphere of influence9. With respect to public transit, the SCSP points to existing transit services and planned service extension to support the North Pointe Business Park but does not analyze transit service deficiencies nor identify transit improvement for residents living within the SCSP area. Additionally, the circulation chapter discusses the Clean Shared Mobility Network, which is entirely a Southwest Fresno Specific Plan Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) project that lies within the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan and it does not infiltrate nor directly benefit South Central Fresno community members. The Clean Shared Mobility Network project should not be mentioned in the SCSP unless the City plans and commits to duplicate the project and its benefits of a mobility network within the community of South Central. To state that this Clean Shared Mobility Network adjoins the SCSP as if it will benefit South Central is a farce because none of the project’s services are within the SCSP area. With respect to traffic calming, the SCSP offers no analysis as to the traffic calming needs of the Plan area to protect pedestrians and bicyclists, The SCSP only proposes the City should consider traffic claiming studies and to seek funding for traffic calming studies after the SCSP is adopted which is unacceptable. Insultingly, the circulation chapter identifies construction of the SR 99 South Fresno Corridor on American and North Avenues as a project that will improve traffic operations and safety at the interchanges and on intersecting and nearby local streets resulting in lower air emissions on the local road system and improved access for businesses in the Plan Area.10 Community opposition to the SR 99 South Fresno Corridor project is well documented and residents have repeatedly called on the local, state, and federal agencies to rescind project approval due to significant air quality impacts of the proposed project. Most recently, public 8 Draft SCSP, page 819 Draft SCSP, page 8110 Draft SCSP, page 93 9 comments were submitted to the Federal Highways Administration documenting the disastrous impacts to the health and well benign of South Fresno neighborhoods, including those within the SCSP area, should the project move forward. Those comments are incorporated herein (and included as Attachment 3). Lastly, as noted in Section II. B of our comments, the truck reroute study is inadequate and truck traffic will intensify in the SCSP area. F.Implementation of the Plan’s Policy Framework is Unclear and Ambiguous The policy and implementation framework found in Chapters 3 and 8 of the draft plan fail to include enforceable, timely, and meaningful policies and implementation actions. Proposed policies across categories are vague, unenforceable, and will not result in reduced pollution exposures near sensitive receptors in the Plan Area. A few notable examples include: T-6 - Help school districts implement a “safe routes to school: " program; T-7 Build, repair, and maintain roads in good conditions;T-12 Consider a funding mechanism to pre-fund infrastructure improvements, prior to allowing development to occur; AQ-2 Request additional 24-hour air monitors from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District around distributions centers, major roads near distributions centers, and at receptive school districts; N-2 Identify noise-impacted areas in the Plan Area; EGB-3 Encourage installation go solar panels, battery storage, and zero-emission backup electricity generators at distribution centers; W-2 Implement a periodic water quality testing program in areas where contamination has been an issue; W-6 Seek funding to expand water facilities ato neighbors within the Plan Area;E-10 Prioritize hiring local residents; PN-1 Establish new noticing requirements for all project types; 10 CBD-1 Consider a Community Benefit Fund to pay for measures such as air filtration systems, dual-paned windows, parks, job training programs, and job fairs near the Plan Areas. Several of the proposed policies mentioned above fail to include a timeline for implementation, identify responsible city departments, identify secured funding sources to implement, and a plan for enforcement. Additionally, the SCSP states that “implementations of policies are subject to available resources, staff capacity and availability, funding, and priorities of decision makers among other things”11, thereby rendering proposed policies and implementation actions meaningless. III.The Draft South Central Specific Plan is Inconsistent with Local and State Policy Goals and Mandates A.The SCSP is Inconsistent with the Goals, Strategies, and Overall Intent of the AB 617 South Central Fresno Community Emission Reduction PlanAB 617 initiated a state-wide effort to monitor and reduce air pollution, and improve public health, in communities that experience disproportionate burdens from exposure to air pollutants through new community-focused and community-driven actions.12 After an extensive public engagement process and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s (Air District) own comprehensive identification and prioritization analysis, the South Central Fresno neighborhood was recommended by the Air District Governing Board and selected by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a first-year community for the development of a community air monitoring plan and emission reduction plan to reduce pollution impacts due to the area’s high cumulative air pollution exposure burden. 13 The SCSP area is within the boundaries of the AB 617 South Central Fresno Region and thus subject to the goals and strategies within the adopted community emission reduction plan (CERP). (Please find included as Attachment 4 a map showing the boundaries of the City of Fresno, the boundaries of the City of Fresno’s sphere of influence, the boundaries of the AB 617 South Central Fresno Region, and the boundaries of the South Central Specific Plan) As noted in the CERP, top community sources of concern include heavy duty trucks, land use and industrial development, and industrial processing in the plan area. 14 To address these concerns, the CERP includes several strategies intended to reduce high cumulative air 11 Draft SCSP, page 13512 2019 South Central Fresno Community Emission Reduction Planhttps://community.valleyair.org/media/kx2gz0h4/01finalscfresnocerp-9-19-19.pdf13 2019 South Central Fresno Community Emission Reduction Planhttps://community.valleyair.org/media/kx2gz0h4/01finalscfresnocerp-9-19-19.pdf14 2019 South Central Fresno Community Emission Reduction Planhttps://community.valleyair.org/media/kx2gz0h4/01finalscfresnocerp-9-19-19.pdf 11 pollution exposure including but not limited to incentive programs for heavy duty truck replacement with zero and near zero emission technology; reducing idling of heavy duty trucks within the community; installation of electric charging infrastructure at distribution center, warehouse, and other types of freight facilities where heavy duty diesel trucks are loaded or unloaded; a heavy duty truck rerouting study which is now pending before the city; supporting projects that reduce vehicle miles traveled to promote active transportation and increase the walkability of community neighborhoods; increased coordination with the City and County on land use planning, permitting and CEQA processes to minimize impact on air quality; increased urban greeting and forestry to improve air quality; and installation of vegetative barriers around and near sources of concern.15The CERP is unequivocal that its purpose is to reduce pollution in the designated south Fresno area. While the Air District leads CERP implementation, the City has a critical role in supporting CERP implementation and emission reduction. As noted above, the proposed land uses and development standards in the draft SCSP will facilitate significant increases in intense and polluting uses near and impacting sensitive receptors within the AB 617 South Central Fresno region thereby undermining community-led, SJVAPCD, and CARB efforts to improve air quality and reduce pollution exposure in the region. B.The SCSP is Inconsistent with the Goals and Projects of the City of Fresno’s Transform Fresno Initiative. In 2016, the City of Fresno was awarded a $70 million Transformative Climate Community (TCC) program grant by the California Strategic Growth Council for Southwest, Downtown and Chinatown areas of Fresno. AB 2722, which created the TCC program, calls for investment in areas that have a high proportion of census tracts identified as disadvantaged communities and that focus on communities that are most disadvantaged.16 The goals of the TCC program are to invest in community-led climate resilience projects in California's most disadvantaged communities. The program aims to achieve these goals through a combination of community-driven climate projects to improve public health and the environment, to strengthen the economy through community serving projects, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions17. A historic and unprecedented participatory process led to the identification of a series of projects that would result in significant environmental and economic benefits to the Chinatown, 15 2019 South Central Fresno Community Emission Reduction Plan, pp 46- 126https://community.valleyair.org/media/kx2gz0h4/01finalscfresnocerp-9-19-19.pdf16 Bill Text: AB 2722 Transformative Climate Communities, Chapter 371, Section 1 Part 4 of Section 75240 of Division 44 of the Public Resources Code17Transformative Climate Communities Fact Sheet: https://sgc.ca.gov/grant-programs/tcc/docs/20231218-TCC_Fact_Sheet.pdf 12 Downtown, and Southwest Fresno neighborhoods.18 Funded projects and programs include but are not limited to clean mobility options, urban greening and increased park space, infrastructure to support neighborhood serving amenities, community gardens, affordable housing, and rooftop solar – all intended to provide environmental and health benefits to communities most disproportionately impacted and reduce greenhouse gasses.19 The Transform Fresno investment area is within the AB 617 South Central Fresno boundary and adjacent to the SCSP area. Combined with strategies in the South Central Fresno CERP, Transform Fresno seeks to improve environmental and health conditions in the very same neighborhoods that will be negatively impacted by the SCSP. Air quality knows no boundaries, and if approved as is, the SCSP will also undermine local and state efforts to build community and climate resilience. C.The Plan Fails to Adhere to the Mandates of the City of Fresno’s Resolution Calling for the Development of the Plan On November 14, 2019, the Fresno City Council passed resolution 2019-23 directing City staff to develop land use designations, zoning, and policies to protect sensitive uses in the SCSP area from the impacts of industrial development and to engage in other planning activities to ensure the extension of essential infrastructure and services to unincorporated SCSP neighborhoods in the City’s development trajectory and engage residents’ in crafting economic development strategies and policies reflective of residents’ priorities for economic mobility and business investment in local communities (Attachment 5: Resolution 2019-235). Specifically, the resolution provides that the City “wishes to obtain input from residents” “to develop a vision, land use changes, and policies that...avoid and minimize impacts to existing sensitive land uses from new development and ensure a decent quality of life and a healthy environment for residents of existing neighborhoods and communities within and near the [SCSP area].” p. 2. The resolution repeatedly emphasizes the City’s intention that SCSP residents inform the SCSP’s policies and land use designations, stating that the plan’s land use policies should be “reflective of community input,” and that residents and stakeholders “shall inform the [SCSP] to the greatest extent feasible, through an inclusive community engagement process.” p. 2. The SCSP does not conform with the mandates outlined in the City’s own resolution. 1.The SCSP Does not Adequately Reduce Intensity of land uses or Include New Land Use Designations18 https://www.transformfresno.com/about/19 https://www.transformfresno.com/projects/ 13 The plan is also not aligned with Resolution 2019-235, which states that the SCSP plan incorporates reductions in the zoning intensity near sensitive uses to provide buffers to protect sensitive uses from adverse impacts from more intense land uses in a manner that reflects stakeholder input. The resolution also states that the Mayor and city council desire new land use designations, policies and implementation actions specific to the plan area, and incorporate relevant environmental mitigation measures reflective of community input and the analysis prepared for the Environmental Impact Review. The reduction in zoning from Heavy or Light Industrial to Regional and Business Park which would still allow intense industrial and polluting uses does not meet this required component of the resolution for the reasons noted above. Furthermore, the plan contains no new land use designations that would reduce pollution impact and intensity of industrial uses, invest in neighborhood serving amenities and services, and promote pedestrian safety and walkability as repeatedly requested by community residents throughout the plan development process. 2.The Draft SCSP Does Not Adequately Incorporate Input From Community-based StakeholdersResolution 2019-235 also states that the SCSP must be informed by stakeholder input. And yet the Draft SCSP largely ignores many of the priorities and recommendations community members raised. Community members recommended a significant reduction in industrial land uses. The Draft SCSP largely ignores this recommendation, instead swapping in Business Park for Industrial zones which allow many of the same polluting uses. If anything, this change misleads and misinforms community stakeholders rather than incorporating the recommendations. For reduced industrial uses. Community stakeholders also recommended increased housing and neighborhood mixed uses zonings to address the need for housing and neighborhood serving retail. Unfortunately, the draft plan provides virtually no Neighborhood Mixed Use. Finally, community members recommended additional park space and walking and biking paths. The Draft SCSP falls far short of providing land requisite to address the need for parks in the neighborhood and fails to make the necessary commitments to update pedestrian and bike safety and infrastructure. In short, the City failed to live up to its mandate to incorporate stakeholder input - or at least community input - into the Draft SCSP. 14 D. The Draft SCSP Fails to Align with the City of Fresno’s General Plan Goals and Policies The ongoing industrialization of the the SCSP area contradicts and is not in alignment with the General Plan’s goals of promoting healthy communities20 and improving public health and safety.21 The draft SCSP is also not in alignment with the General Plan’s Environmental Justice Goal A which states that, “...related to land use planning… ensure new developments do not disproportionately burden disadvantaged communities. To ensure the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies do not disproportionately impact any individual race, any culture, income or education level.”22 IV.Recommendations A.Ensure Effective Public Engagement in The Development of the Final SCSPDespite the City’s own call for ongoing community engagement in the development of the SCSP (through Resolution 2019-235) the City failed to meaningfully engage impacted people and seek feedback on the Draft SCSP. We are hopeful that the City incorporates all of the substantive changes recommended below, but regardless, more engagement will be necessary before plan adoption to ensure inclusion of all impacted neighborhoods. B.Recommended Changes to the Draft South Central Specific Plan The City should redraft the SCSP based on recommendations included in the Community Plan Alternative, included in additional community engagement as recommended above, and included herein to promote health, safety, equitable access to amenities, and to align with City and State policies and mandates. We’ve summarized the recommendations below and look forward to working with you to incorporate and implement the following land use and policy changes. 20 Draft SCSP, page 13, goal number 921 Draft SCSP, page 15, goal number 1522 Id. 15 We recommend the following changes to the Land Use Map to ensure that sensitive receptors are protected from some of the harshest impacts of increased industrialization and intensification of land use: -Eliminate Industrial Zoned Land within one half mile of sensitive receptors or land zoned for sensitive receptors -Shift Industrial Zoned Land to Business Park, Commercial General or Neighborhood Mixed Use subject to the recommendations below -Change land that is currently zoned General Commercial to Neighborhood Mixed Use in areas that would allow a half mile buffer between the NMX use and existing industrial uses -Change land that is currently zoned Industrial or Business Park to Neighborhood Mixed Use in areas that would allow a half mile buffer between the NMX use and industrial uses -Increase park acreage by at least 10 acres to address the need for parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas in the plan areaWe recommend inclusion of the following transportation and circulation policies:-Eliminate truck routes that pass within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors -Implement UC Merced’s Health Impact Assessment’s recommendations of developing truck routes outside of the 1,000 foot buffer and even further away when considering more vulnerable populations; any new and future truck routes must be designed to avoid locations where people live, work and play.-Set enforceable timelines for implementation of pedestrian safety plans and traffic calming measures, including but not limited to: -Construction of Class I bike routes -Construction of walking and bike paths on canal banks -Construction of complete streets-Coordinate with residents and law enforcement entities to enforce truck routes and other traffic calming and traffic safety measures We recommend the following policy changes to the proposed overlay zone: -Prohibit intensive land uses and / or land uses that attract heavy duty truck traffic within a half mile of a sensitive receptor or an area zoned for a sensitive receptor. Such uses include but are not limited to general industrial, intense industrial, limited industrial, warehousing, service station, shooting / archery range, salvage and wrecking, freight / truck terminals and warehouses, waste transfer facility, mining and quarrying, motorcycle / riding club, construction and material yards, building materials and services, communications facilities within buildings, and agriculture processing and agricultural services. 16 -Require a CUP for any of the following uses in the plan area and require public notice and a public hearing prior to CUP approval: general industrial, intense industrial, limited industrial, warehousing, service station, shooting / archery range, salvage and wrecking, freight / truck terminals and warehouses, waste transfer facility, mining and quarrying, motorcycle / riding club, construction and material yards, building materials and services, communications facilities within buildings, and agriculture processing and agricultural services. -Require that all loading docks at warehousing facilities and similar facilities are oriented away from sensitive receptors and eliminate discretion to override the requirement -Require a half mile set-back from dock-doors to sensitive receptors-Prohibit expansion, modification, and intensification of existing and new industrial uses in the SCSP area boundaries unless they meet all technologically feasible components of development standards laid out in the City’s Development Code, including but not limited to requirements related to set-backs, landscaping, screening, ingress and egress standards, queuing standards, dock door orientation, and buffer zones. -Require local hiring practices and standards to ensure that residents of the Planning Area and adjacent neighborhoods have access to job and career opportunities that result from plan implementation. We recommend that the following additional policies be incorporated into the City’s Development Code upon its adoption:-Require extension of water and wastewater service to any residents living in or adjacent to the City’s sphere of influence who opt for municipal water and wastewater service -Require fire suppression systems in businesses that pose high risk of fires including businesses that produce pallets, chemicals, and other flammable materials. -Require businesses that pose great fire risk to provide nearby sensitive receptors with military grade gas/respirator masks for the population of school staff/faculty/ and students for emergency use during an active fire -Require the creation of a Community Benefit Fund (CBF) to fund home and neighborhood level improvements and facilitate job and career opportunities for residents of the plan area. Additionally, require all industrial developments to contribute funds to the CBF.****Thank you for your consideration of these comments and recommendations. We look forward to working with you, and other stakeholders, to create a South Central Specific Plan that matches the potential of South Fresno neighborhoods to thrive. 17 Sincerely,Ivanka SaundersLeadership Counsel for Justice and AccountabilityTerry HirschfieldSuperintendent, Orange Center Elementary School DistrictLaura MorenoFriends of CalwaKimberly McCoyCentral California Asthma CollaborativeNayamin MartinezCentral California Environmental Justice NetworkJePahl WhiteFaith in the Valley and Healthy Fresno AirKeishaun WhiteHealthy Fresno AirRosa DePewSouth Fresno Community AlliancePanfilo CerrilloSouth Fresno Community AllianceIsabel VargasLisa FloresAraceli SanabriaYonas PaulosHomeless Veterans AdvocateYolanda TorresThe Children’s MovementMartha SanchezThe Children’s MovementSonia Bravo 18 The Children’s MovementConnie VargasThe Children’s MovementJuana IrisThe Children’s MovementLamora WoodsThe Children’s MovementCc: Ryan Hayashi, Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer, SJVAPCD Rob SwansonDeputy Attorney General | Bureau of Environmental JusticeMiguel Arias, City Council Member District 3 Brian Moore, Air Resources Supervisor, CARB From:

To:

Subject: Comments on the FEIR for The Fresno South Central Specific Plan (SCH# 2019079022) - City Council Regular Meeting 12.5.24 Agenda Item 1 Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 3:55:00 PM
Attachments: image001.png
SCSP FEIR Comments 12-3-24.pdf
External Email: Use caution with links and attachments
Good afternoon,

Please find attached a letter from Edward Schexnayder, on behalf of the Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability, regarding comments on the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City’s South Central Specific Plan. Please confirm your receipt of the attached comments for consideration at the regular City Council meeting on December 5, 2024, under Agenda Item 1, ID 24-1571. Thank you.

Sara L. Breckenridge
Secretary to Carmen J. Borg
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
A San Francisco Green Business

December 3, 2024
Via Electronic Mail Only

City Council
City of Fresno
2600 Fresno Street
Fresno, CA 93721
E-Mail:

Re: Final Environmental Impact Report For The Fresno South Central Specific Plan (SCH# 2019079022)

Honorable Members of the City Council:

On behalf of the Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability (“Leadership Counsel”), we have reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”) for the City’s South Central Specific Plan (“SCSP”, “Specific Plan”, or “Project”). The FEIR does not correct the inadequacies of the Draft EIR (“DEIR”) that were identified in previously submitted comments.1Additionally, the DEIR and FEIR, (collectively referred to as the “EIR”) prepared for the Project violates the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) for all of the reasons set forth below.

Unfortunately, the FEIR fails to provide the public and decision makers with the information necessary to properly evaluate the Project. The FEIR neither adequately responds to comments previously raised nor cures the legal inadequacies identified by those comments. Some examples of these deficiencies include but are not limited to a failure to include: (1) adequate analysis and mitigation disclosing the Project’s potentially significant impacts on residents in the SCSP area; (2) an adequate evaluation of the Project’s air quality impacts, especially in light of significant existing air pollution in the Plan area; (3) an adequate analysis or mitigation of the Project’s significant public safety impacts, and (4) an adequate analysis or mitigation of the Project’s significant noise impacts. Rather than revise the DEIR to comprehensively address these issues, the FEIR merely seeks to defend the erroneous assertions and conclusions of the prior document.

1 Our comments on the DEIR dated July 30, 2024 and all of its Exhibits are expressly incorporated herein.

City Council
December 3, 2024

Where the FEIR does add analysis or make changes, it fails to acknowledge the significance or impacts of the changes or recirculate the document. These flaws demand that the EIR be substantially modified and recirculated for review and comment by the public and public agencies.

The EIR’s failings will most directly and significantly impact low-income, disadvantaged residents and communities, especially communities of color, in South Central Fresno. The City must revise and recirculate the EIR to provide the public an accurate assessment of the environmental and public health issues at stake, and a mitigation strategy—developed before SCSP approval—that fully addresses the Project’s significant impacts. The City must also take a serious look at alternatives that can better avoid or lessen most of the Project’s significant impacts.

This letter, along with the air quality report previously prepared by Patrick Sutton, Senior Environmental Engineer, Baseline Environmental, Inc. (“Baseline Report” attached as Exh. A) constitute our comments on the FEIR. Please refer to the Baseline Report for further detail and discussion of the EIR’s inadequacies with regard to air quality impacts.

I. The FEIR Inadequately Responds to Comments Raised on the FEIR.

In an FEIR, a lead agency must respond to all comments made on the DEIR. Pub.

Res. Code § 21091(d); CEQA Guidelines §§ 15088(a), 15132. When a comment objects to the DEIR’s analysis and raises significant environmental issues, the FEIR’s response must give a reasoned, good-faith analysis and “describe the disposition of significant environmental issues raised,” such as how revisions to the project will mitigate anticipated impacts. CEQA Guidelines § 15088(c). Comments must be “addressed in detail giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted.” Id.

Detailed responses are required to “ensure that the lead agency will fully consider the environmental consequences of a decision before it is made.” City of Long Beach v.

Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 904. The required level of detail “depends on factors such as the significance of the issues raised, the level of detail of the proposed project, the level of detail of the comment, and the extent to which the matter is already addressed in the DEIR or responses to other comments.” Id. at 901.

Generally, the level of detail in the response must match the level of detail in the comment. Pfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1552, 1568. “Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information” are never an adequate response.

Guidelines § 15088(c); City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist. (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 362, 391.

City Council
December 3, 2024

As set forth below, in numerous instances, the FEIR’s response to comments fails to meet these requirements. Some responses do not sufficiently address the comment. In other cases, the responses ignore comments entirely. The City has not shown a good faith effort to consider public input, much less modify the DEIR as a result.

II. The FEIR Fails to Correct Errors and Omissions in the Analyses of and Mitigation for the SCSP’s Environmental Impacts Are Legally Inadequate.

Rather than providing meaningful disclosure of the Project’s environmental impacts, the FEIR largely seeks to defend the erroneous assertions and conclusions in the DEIR. In addition, in many cases, the FEIR’s responses to comments refer the reader to unrelated responses, none of which address the comment. For example, Comment 10-47 highlights the DEIR’s failure to complete an adequate analysis of impacts resulting from changes to heavy duty truck routes. See FEIR at 2-147, comment 10-47. However, the FEIR response references Master Response 6: Relationship to the Truck Reroute Study, which fails to address the comment. FEIR at 2-8 and 2-9. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated mistake. The FEIR includes many instances of this incongruity between valid comments and inadequate responses. Furthermore, instead of providing detailed responses to comments that are supported with factual information, in many instances the FEIR provides unsupported, conclusory assertions or merely reiterates information already contained in the DEIR. This approach runs afoul of CEQA’s mandate that in responding to comments, an agency must provide a reasoned analysis supported by factual information. CEQA Guidelines § 15088(c).

This letter does not reiterate each and every comment from the DEIR comment letter dated July 30, 2024 or from the attached Baseline reports (Exhibit A)2. The summaries below illustrate how the FEIR’s analyses of the Project’s environmental impacts remain thoroughly inadequate and, in many cases, entirely unaddressed.

A. The FEIR Fails to Adequately Analyze and Mitigate the SCSP’s Air Quality Impacts.

Our prior letter demonstrated that the DEIR substantially underestimated the Project’s increase in air quality emissions, in part because it defers a substantial portion of the analysis of impacts to the future, when development projects are proposed. As explained above, the FEIR continues to rely on the assertion that because the EIR is a program-level document, analysis of the impacts is not required. See, e.g., FEIR at 2-159 stating “[A]t this programmatic stage, the Draft EIR does not attempt to quantify the

2 Note that this report was submitted with our DEIR comments.

City Council
December 3, 2024

number of new trucks that could be added to any one existing roadway as individual development projects are yet to be proposed.”
In addition, as discussed above, the FEIR fails to adequately respond to all of our submitted comments. Examples are discussed below.

1. Inconsistency with Assembly Bill 617
Our letter explained that due to South Central Fresno’s status as a disadvantaged community disproportionally burdened by exposure to air pollutants, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) selected it for development of one of California’s first AB 617 air pollution reduction plans. FEIR at 2-121, Comment 10-13. The resulting plan, the South Central Fresno Community Emissions Reduction Program (“CERP”), aims to lower air emissions over baseline levels and reduce localized pollution and related health impacts in South Central Fresno. Id. Our comments therefore emphasized that in analyzing the SCSP’s consistency with local air quality plans, the DEIR errs in failing to analyze the SCSP’s consistency with the CERP and AB 617. This lack of analysis is significant because the DEIR fails to disclose that by planning for a massive surge in industrial uses, the Plan would increase emissions at a scale that could negate benefits from the CERP’s implementation and undercut the CERP’s core purpose.

In response, the FEIR simply notes our concern that “adoption of the Specific Plan could negate CERP benefits.” Rather than addressing that concern directly, it references the FEIR’s response to CARB’s DEIR comment letter “for information pertaining to the SCSP’s consistency with the CERP.” FEIR at 2-158, Response 10-13.

CARB’s comment letter raises similar concerns. It stresses that “the construction and operation described in the Specific Plan will expose nearby residential communities to elevated levels of air pollution beyond the existing baseline emissions.” FEIR at 2-11; Comment 1-4. It notes that the 400 residences within the plan area are already exposed to high levels of diesel PM emissions from operation of existing industrial facilities and nearby highway and railway traffic. CARB further explains that AB 617 highlights the “need for further emission reductions in communities with high exposure burdens,” and that the CERP was developed “to significantly reduce emissions within the [South Central Fresno] community” given its “high pollution burden.” FEIR at 2-11, Comment 1-5. It stresses that it is “therefore imperative that the City ensure that its land use decisions, including its decision on this Project, are consistent with the … CERP, in its entirety.” Id.

City Council
December 3, 2024

In response to CARB, the FEIR claims that because several air pollution mitigation measures in the DEIR and policies in the SCSP on vehicular and operational emissions “align with the strategies identified by SJVAPCD in the [] CERP and would serve to reduce the SCSP’s contribution of air pollution to the plan area, … the SCSP is consistent with the [] CERP.” FEIR at 2-29, Response 1-5. This faulty logic ignores the fundamental and irreconcilable conflict between the CERP and the SCSP: The CERP requires that air pollution in South Central Fresno be reduced (FEIR at 2-121, Comment 10-13), but construction and operation of development under the SCSP implementation will increase emissions to levels that could cause adverse health outcomes for sensitive receptors, a significant and unavoidable impact. DEIR at 4.3-28 to 4.3-31. These emissions will further degrade air quality in one of the most pollution-burdened communities in California. The EIR further errs in failing to acknowledge or discuss how the SCSP’s emphasis on industrial expansion in the heart of the AB 617 South Central Fresno community, through the Plan’s land use designations and policies, is antithetical to the CERP’s statutory mandate to reduce air emissions exposures by sensitive receptors in that area. In failing to discuss the clear inconsistencies of the SCSP with the CERP, the EIR violates CEQA. See CEQA Guidelines § 15125(d) (an EIR must discuss any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general plans, specific plans, and regional plans); Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2017) 2.

Cal.5th 918, 941 (CEQA prohibits lead agencies from “perfom[ing] truncated and siloed environmental review, leaving it to other responsible agencies to address related concerns seriatum”).

2. The FEIR’s Study Area Boundary Ignores CARB’s South
Central Fresno Community Emissions Reduction Program
Boundary Thereby Failing to Properly Describe the Existing Setting.

Our letter noted that the DEIR appears to use the SCSP boundary as the study area for air quality analysis. FEIR at 2-122, Comment 10-14. The FEIR responds that it evaluates potential air pollution impacts for receptors located within and adjacent to the Plan Area, as well as regionally. FEIR at 2-157, Response 10-14. However, it provides no citations to substantial evidence to support this claim. For example, it is unclear whether the DEIR’s analysis of potential carbon monoxide hotspots (DEIR at 3.4-30) was restricted to roadways within the Plan Area, or if it also looked at roadways in surrounding unincorporated areas that will see in a surge in heavy truck traffic from SCSP implementation. Without such information, it is impossible for the public to ascertain whether the EIR actually considers air quality impacts to receptors outside of the SCSP area.

City Council
December 3, 2024

3. The FEIR Fails to Respond to Expert Comments Submitted on the DEIR.

The FEIR fails to address the comments related to air quality impacts submitted in the Baseline Report, attached as Exhibit A to our DEIR comment letter and resubmitted with this letter. While our DEIR comments provided a summary of the Baseline Report, we expressly referred EIR preparers to Exhibit A of our comment letter for further detail and discussion. FEIR at 2-115, Comment 10-4. By omitting responses to the more detailed comments in the Baseline Report, the FEIR fails to address several of the comments submitted therein.

4. The FEIR Fails to Adequately Address the DEIR’s Failure to Incorporate Available Data and Findings Related to Toxic Air Contaminants
We commented that the DEIR should have incorporated key findings from the Truck Reroute Study and its associated Health Impact Assessment (“HIA”). FEIR at 2- 158 and 2-159, Comment 10-16. The FEIR response attempts to justify the failure to include this information based on timing of the document’s publication, implying that there was no time to incorporate the information. FEIR at pp. 2-158 and 2-159, Response 10-16. However, the City is a co-author of the Truck Reroute Study, therefore staff should have collaborated to share relevant information to both the SCSP Plan and EIR and to the Truck Reroute Study. Moreover, the City has had more than three months to incorporate the findings of the study into the FEIR, but failed to do so.

This is not a mere technicality. The Truck Reroute Study and its HIA assessed the impact of air pollution (in relation to truck traffic) on the risk of common health outcomes, such as infant mortality, asthma, and cardio vascular events in the community.

As explained in our prior comments and in the Baseline Report, one of the key findings of the HIA is that pregnant people who live within 1,000 feet of a freeway, 1,000 feet of a truck route, or 300 feet of a major road have significantly higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth and infant mortality. FEIR at 2-123, Comments 10-16 and 10-17; Baseline Report at 9 and 10. Had this information been used for both analyses, the EIR could have taken into account the fact that parcels located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors should not be zoned to allow for polluting uses (e.g., warehouse uses) and that roads running along residential areas should not be identified as truck routes.

City Council
December 3, 2024

Similarly, the City has a 2015 Health Risk Assessment prepared for the Downtown Neighborhoods Community Plan (DNCP) in Fresno. This study showed particulate matter concentrations from vehicle emissions near State Routes in the DNCP area indicate existing cancer risk to sensitive receptors exceeds 100 in a million at distances from 1,000 to 5,000 feet from the freeways. FEIR at 2-123, Comment 10-17; and Baseline Report at 9. But rather than revising the EIR to incorporate this information, the FEIR only states that the DEIR’s impact analysis and mitigation measures minimize the Project’s significant impacts.

The FEIR refers specifically to Mitigation Measure 4.3-3d as the measure that addresses the Project’s toxic air contaminant emission impacts. While this measure has been revised, it fails to specify truck routes or to establish a 1,000 foot buffer between truck routes and existing sensitive uses. At a minimum, the City should make the following revisions to Mitigation Measure 4.3-3d (shown in redline/strikeout):

Mitigation Measure 4.3-3d: Protect New and Existing Sensitive Land Uses To minimize impacts from TAC exposure, for future existing and subsequent development under the proposed plan, the following measures shall be implemented:
▪ Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 1,000 feet from the centerline of a freeway, unless such development contributes to smart growth, open space, or transit-oriented goals, in which case the development shall include feasible measures such as separation/setbacks, landscaping, barriers, ventilation systems with a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 13 or higher to clean diesel particulate matter from indoor air, air filters/cleaners, and/or other equivalent effective measures to minimize potential impacts from air pollution by at least 85%.3
▪ Require new sensitive land uses to include feasible measures such as separation/setbacks, landscaping, barriers, ventilation systems with a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 13 or higher to clean particulate matter from indoor air, and/or other effective measures to minimize potential impacts from air pollution.

3 Air filters with a MERV-13 rating or higher can reduce levels of indoor diesel PM by at least 85 percent relative to the incoming outdoor air. See, South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2009. Pilot Study of High Performance Air Filtration for Classrooms Applications, October, attached as Exhibit B; and Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2016. Planning Healthy Places, attached as Exhibit C.

City Council
December 3, 2024

▪ For future development requiring the use of heavy-duty trucks, designate truck routes that avoid sensitive land uses and ensure the routes provide a 1,000-foot buffer from existing sensitive receptors.
▪ Require that zoning regulations provide adequate separation and buffering between existing and proposed residential and industrial uses (i.e., a minimum of 1,000 feet).
▪ Designate truck routes to avoid residential areas including low-income and minority neighborhoods ensuring the routes provide a 1,000-foot buffer from existing sensitive receptors.

As evidenced by the 2015 Health Risk Assessment prepared for the DNCP, these revisions are the minimum buffers needed and critical to protecting existing both existing and future residents, school children, and other sensitive receptors from toxic diesel fumes. Baseline Report at 9.

5. The FEIR Fails to Adequately Analyze the SCSP’s Potential to Impact Public Health.

We commented that the DEIR failed to adequately analyze the SCSP’s health risk resulting from construction emissions because it fails to evaluate construction emissions for the whole of the Project. FEIR at 2-129 and 2-130, Comment 10-24 and Baseline Report at 5. The Baseline Report comments also pointed out that, based on examples of other municipalities that successful evaluated plan-level health risks from construction, the City could also have conducted such an analysis. Baseline Report at 5 and 6. The FEIR response defends the EIR’s approach of deferring analysis of construction emissions and requiring project level analysis and reiterates the requirements of Mitigation Measure 4.3-3a.

Moreover, the FEIR entirely ignores our comment that the DEIR failed to evaluate potential health risks associated with total organic gases emitted from passenger vehicles.

FEIR at 2-120, Comment 10-24 and Baseline Report at 6. As explained in the Baseline Report, passenger vehicles (not just trucks) in urban areas can pose a significant health risk to sensitive receptors. Id. The FEIR fails to address these comments.

Additionally, the EIR still improperly bypasses analysis of emissions from the whole of the project rather than deferring until project-level analyses can be performed.

Therefore, the FEIR fails to adequately address this issue.

The FEIR fails to correct the DEIR’s inadequate analysis of the Project’s cumulative health impacts to residents living close to truck routes and in close proximity

City Council
December 3, 2024

to highways. FEIR at 2-130 and 2-132 and 2-133, Comment 10-27 and Baseline Report at 7 and 8. Here too, the FEIR defends the EIR’s approach of deferring analysis of all Project-related emissions on the basis that the “SCSP provides a suite of land use designations with many allowable uses within each designation,” implying that the analysis would be speculative. FEIR at 2-164, Response 10-27. However, the City could certainly estimate emissions based on the types of uses allowed under the proposed zoning, as other jurisdictions have done. Baseline Report at 5 and 6. The FEIR fails to provide evidence to support the conclusion that the analysis is infeasible or otherwise speculative, and fails to fulfill CEQA’s mandate for analysis of cumulative impacts.

B. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Analyses Do Not Comply With CEQA.

1. The FEIR fails to make a clear significance determination or base its conclusions on substantial evidence.

We commented that the DEIR’s analysis of energy efficiency was inadequate because it failed to state how much energy would be wasted. FEIR at 2-165 and 2-166, Comment 10-32. The FEIR’s response argues that its qualitative assessment was sufficient because it can be “reasonably assumed” that any project without electric vehicle infrastructure or other decarbonization methods would result in energy waste. Id.

This is a non sequitur. Decarbonizing energy is not the same as reducing the waste of energy, regardless of its source. The EIR’s conflation of these two issues precludes any meaningful analysis of how much energy a project may waste. It is insufficient to merely state that a project would not be perfectly efficient and stop there. CEQA demands meaningful analysis that is supported by substantial evidence. Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392-93.

We also commented that the DEIR used an improper threshold of significance for GHG impacts. FEIR at 2-165, Comment 10-29. The EIR used a threshold that is not based on the state’s most recent GHG reduction target or a target with milestones beyond 2030. Id. The FEIR’s response defended its use of the threshold for two reasons: (1) 25 percent of the construction will occur in 2024 (i.e. before 2030), so the threshold need not be tied to milestones after 2030, and (2) the threshold was linked to the state target set by SB 32, which has not been superseded. FEIR at 2-165. Both of these reasons are insufficient.

First, 2024 is nearly over; it is virtually impossible for any, let alone 25 percent, of construction to occur in 2024. Further, even assuming most of the construction does occur before 2030, the DEIR assumed that some of it would occur as late as 2040. DEIR

City Council
December 3, 2024

4.6-7. Therefore, the threshold of significance should be based on an emissions target with future milestones beyond 2030.

Second, SB 32 is not the most recent state target. Regardless of whether the threshold is linked to SB 32 or the superseded EOB-30-15, neither represent the state’s most recent emissions reduction legislation. AB 1279 established more aggressive emission reduction targets. DEIR at 4.6-4. Thus, the threshold of significance based on SB 32 is outdated and improper for use in the DEIR. Further, the second GHG threshold analyzes consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan, which lays out the pathway to reach the 2045 goal set by AB 1279. DEIR at 4.8-14. The DEIR cannot purport to analyze for consistency with the Scoping Plan while it uses a numerical threshold based on an entirely different goal and premature milestone. Therefore, the significance threshold should be replaced with a figure tied to the current state goals.

Finally, the FEIR fails to explain why its selected threshold, based on a statewide target, is appropriate for use in this project. Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 227-28 held that while it is appropriate for an EIR to use a state emission reduction goal to formulate its threshold of significance, it must have evidence to show the amount of project-specific reductions needed to achieve compliance with the state goal. Id. at 227-28. It is not sufficient to assume that all projects will need to achieve the same level of reductions, regardless of project type or location. Id. at 227. Here, the DEIR similarly used a threshold that relied on a statewide target. FEIR at 2-165. But it failed to explain how that state target translated to a threshold of significance at the local level. Instead, the DEIR simply stated that it took that threshold from the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (“SMAQMD”). DEIR at 4.8-13. It lacks any evidence or explanation showing how this Sacramento-based threshold is appropriate for use in Fresno.

2. The FEIR’s GHG and Energy analyses rely on improperly deferred mitigation and inadequate measures.

We commented that the DEIR’s mitigation measures for GHG and energy impacts were inadequate. FEIR at 2-166 and 2-167, Comments 10-34 to 10-38. For example, we pointed out that measure 4.8-1a was impermissibly vague because it lacked specific performance standards. Id. at Comment 10-34. The FEIR’s response defended the measure by claiming the analysis did not rely on it to conclude impacts would be less than significant. Id. at 2-166. It reasoned that because impacts were unavoidable, the vague measure was sufficient. Id. The FEIR provided a similar response to our other comments attacking the adequacy of mitigation measures. Id.

City Council
December 3, 2024

But the response fails to address the EIR’s inadequacy as an informational document. A finding of unavoidable impacts does not cure defects in mitigation measures. King & Gardiner Farms, LLC v. County of Kern (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 814, 865-870. An EIR must remedy deficiencies in its mitigation measures to properly serve as an informational document. Id. It does not matter whether the EIR relied on a specific mitigation measure or concluded impacts were unavoidable; the measures still must comply with CEQA’s requirements. Therefore, all of the mitigation measures in the FEIR must be sufficiently specific, enforceable, and supported by substantial evidence.

Moreover, where a project’s impacts are significant and unavoidable, the agency has an obligation to adopt all feasible mitigation. Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 524-25. Here, the DEIR found the project’s energy impacts would be significant but unavoidable. DEIR at 4.8-18. Thus, to the extent that the agency finds the defective measures to be feasible, they must adopt and rely on them. The EIR may not simply make a “significant but unavoidable” finding and then ignore the mitigation measures. Sierra Club, 6 Cal.5th at 524-25. Further, at the very least, it is feasible to fix the issues with the mitigation measures. For example, measure 4.8-1a, which is impermissibly vague, can be fixed by adding specific performance standards to measure the efficacy of the low carbon concrete. Sierra Watch v. County of Placer (2021) 69 Cal.App.5th 86, 110. Accordingly, the FEIR must modify the mitigation measures to cure the defects before moving forward.

C. The FEIR fails to adequately disclose the Project’s increase in VMT.

We commented that the DEIR’s use of per-capita VMT was misleading because the increase in total VMT could lead to greater environmental impacts, including higher GHG emissions. FEIR at 2-168, Comment 10-42. The FEIR’s response failed to address this issue. Id.

D. The FEIR Fails to Sufficiently Analyze Impacts Related to Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety
Our DEIR comments emphasized the existing traffic safety hazards in South Central Fresno from industrial truck traffic on neighborhood streets that lack safe infrastructure for pedestrians and bicyclists. FEIR at 2-141 to 2-147, Comments 10-43 to 10-47. We noted that these hazards would be exacerbated by increased industrial development under the SCSP and the corresponding surge in truck traffic. We explained that CEQA requires the City to analyze and mitigate for such traffic safety impacts (see City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified School District (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 362,

City Council
December 3, 2024

391), and that the DEIR omits this required analysis and related mitigation. FEIR at 2- 141 to 2-147, Comments 10-43 to 10-47.

As explained below, the FEIR fails to recognize this obligation. It claims, despite information in the record to the contrary, that there is no evidence that SCSP implementation will result in significant traffic safety impacts and that the City therefore did not need to analyze them. It also errs in defending the DEIR’s failure to examine how the AB 617 Truck Reroute Study, which it relies on to justify its claim that certain transportation hazards would be less than significant, could exacerbate truck safety hazards in the Plan Area.

1. The FEIR Must Examine How Implementation of the SCSP Would Impact Bicyclist, Pedestrian, and Traffic Safety.

Our letter commented that the DEIR does not meet its legal mandate to provide an intelligent evaluation of potential traffic safety harms. FEIR at 2-142, Comment 10-44.

The DEIR examines four transportation-related impacts: Impact 1 – conflicts with existing general policies and programs, Impact 2 – VMT, Impact 3 – hazards from geometric design features or incompatible uses, and Impact 4 – emergency vehicle access. As we noted, the DEIR’s analysis of these impacts does not assess what the SCSP’s truck traffic impacts would actually be for the community. For example, the DEIR does not discuss where in the Plan Area increased truck traffic is most likely to create unsafe conditions, or how the Plan’s end uses would impact users of the Plan Area’s currently-precarious bike and pedestrian facilities. FEIR at 2-143, Comment 10-

44. It thereby fails to conduct a sufficient analysis of traffic safety impacts under City of Maywood, 208 Cal.App.4th 392-95 (where a project increases the risk of conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians, an EIR must analyze and mitigate those impacts); see also Pub. Res. Code § 21002, 21002.1(b); CEQA Guidelines § 15065(a)(4) (where substantial evidence shows a project will “cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly,” an agency must find that the project will have a significant effect on the environment).

The FEIR attempts to excuse these deficiencies by claiming that, as a program level EIR for the SCSP, it can and need do no more. FEIR at 2-168, Response 10-44. It asserts that the DEIR includes a thorough analysis of transportation hazards based on the level of project detail available. Id. It further suggests that the DEIR’s statement that SCSP implementation would increase industrial uses in the area and result in considerable increases in truck traffic is all that CEQA requires. Id. And it contends that because “[t]he SCSP is a land use plan,” that any greater level of analysis requires “individual project-specific details [that] are not available.” Id.

City Council
December 3, 2024

The Court of Appeal has already warned the City that it cannot simply point to an EIR’s programmatic nature “to justify its decision not to address pedestrian impacts at the program level.” South Fresno Community Alliance v. City of Fresno (Cal. Ct. App., Aug. 6, 2024, No. F086180) 2024 WL 3663122, at *22; see also Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 413, 440 (“[t]he fact more precise information may be available during the next tier of environmental review does not excuse [an agency] from providing what information it reasonably can” at the first stage of environmental review). In South Fresno Community Alliance, the Court found that the program EIR for the City’s General Plan should have analyzed traffic-related impacts to pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders and concluded whether those impacts were significant. It noted that the record supported a fair argument that these impacts were significant because evidence showed that industrial development had resulted in increased traffic that impacts pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders.

Relying on Maywood, the Court found that, in light of this evidence, the program EIR did not adequately justify its decision to ignore these impacts at the program level.

The City’s SCSP EIR takes the same deficient approach to traffic safety analysis that the Court invalidated in South Fresno Community Alliance: it discounts evidence of known hazards as an excuse to avoid analyzing impacts and requiring mitigation of significant impacts. The FEIR claims that our letter “offers no evidence to suggest that implementation of development under the SCSP would result in significant adverse impacts relative to bicycle, pedestrian, and traffic safety.” FEIR at 2-168, Response 10-

44. This is wrong. Our DEIR comment letter highlighted specific traffic hazard hot spots where residents feel the most acute danger from truck traffic. These include the Orange Center Elementary School, which is within the Plan Area on South Cherry Avenue between East Central Avenue and East North Avenue. These also include existing residential communities in close proximity to industrial uses throughout the Plan Area, including the community of Calwa. Our comments note that residents of these areas report that industrial truck traffic passes right in front of their homes and that this traffic has led them to feel unsafe walking or driving in their neighborhoods. FEIR at 2-169, Comment 10-45. We further noted that the DEIR omits any analysis of how residents of these communities will be impacted by truck and other traffic from projects developed under the SCSP.

The FEIR fails to provide any direct response to these comments. FEIR at 2-169, Response 10-45. Instead, it simply claims that future project-level traffic safety analysis will be sufficient to identify any hazards associated with increased truck and other traffic, and that projects’ design standards will “address such hazards.” FEIR at 2-168, Response 10-44. It further claims that AB 98 requirements for new logistics centers to locate

City Council
December 3, 2024

loading docks and points of entry on arterials will reduce the SCSP’s potential to “introduce a transportation hazard to bicycle or pedestrian safety.” Id.

The FEIR’s assertion that it need do no more no to analyze the SCSP’s impacts to pedestrians and cyclists is unsupported and runs contrary to Court of Appeal’s directives in City of Maywood and South Fresno Community Alliance. It is especially confounding because the issues in the South Fresno Community Alliance are the same as those here:
traffic safety impacts of expanded industrial uses in South Fresno from implementation of a long-range planning document, in that case, the City’s General Plan. The City cannot continue to ignore CEQA’s requirement that it to evaluate traffic safety impacts on vulnerable community members in South Central Fresno.

2. The FEIR Improperly Relies On Proposed Policies To Conclude That The SCSP’s Traffic Safety Impacts Would Be Less Than Significant.

Our letter explains that the DEIR improperly neglects to reach a conclusion about the significance of traffic safety impacts separately from its discussion of policies intended to mitigate such impacts. DEIR at 2-145, Comment 1-46. This circumvents CEQA’s requirement to first examine the significance of an environmental impact, and then, for each significant impact, discuss proposed mitigation. Pub. Res. Code § 21100(b); Lotus v. Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645, 656. We further note that SCSP policies that DEIR suggests will mitigate possible impacts are too vague to serve as mitigation. See, e.g., Policy MT-5-d (implementation of traffic access design and control standards), MT-6-c (path or trail connections to recreational facilities in neighborhoods with lower per capita rates of vehicle ownership and parks and open space).

In response, the EIR defends its lack of analysis of traffic safety impacts by claiming that there was no evidence of such potential impacts for it to have analyzed.

FEIR 2-169, Response 10-46. It notes that the DEIR described SCSP policies, development standards and other City requirements “that are aimed at precluding adverse safety impacts.” Id. The FEIR claims that while these strategies collectively “will serve to improve safety and reduce the air quality, noise, and other impacts of truck traffic on the community of South Fresno” that it simply did not need to analyze traffic safety as a distinct impact because “the EIR determined that there is no evidence to suggest that approval of the SCSP would result in significant adverse [traffic] safety impacts.” Id. Yet the EIR never actually made such a determination—it skipped over that analysis entirely.

City Council
December 3, 2024

This failure to analyze impacts of truck traffic on pedestrians and cyclists is inexcusable. The DEIR notes in its section disclosing areas of controversy that “truck traffic and safety hazards” is a “major area[] of controversy” for the Plan. DEIR at 2-4.

Moreover, the DEIR and SCSP acknowledge that existing pedestrian facilities are inadequate. See DEIR at 4.15-12 (“[T]here are currently very limited pedestrian facilities in the vicinity of the project site. Sidewalks do exist on portions of East Avenue, North Avenue, Central Avenue, Church Avenue, and Jensen Avenue but are disconnected from one another or are disjointed”); SCSP at 120 (“there is a lack of complete sidewalks, which results in hazards to pedestrians, particularly to children around neighborhood schools that there are incomplete bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the Plan Area”).

And, as described above, the very same issue was litigated in the South Fresno Community Alliance case, where the Court found evidence of traffic safety hazards from industrial truck traffic in this same area of the City. In failing to disclose, analyze, and mitigate the Project’s significant transportation impacts on pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders, even after being presented evidence of those impacts, the EIR violates CEQA. This omission was prejudicial because it prevented decisionmakers from understanding the nature and magnitude of impacts from increased truck traffic, and meant that the DEIR proposed no mitigation for those impacts.

3. The FEIR Fails To Adequately Analyze the Cumulative Affects Related to Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety.

Our DEIR comments note that the City relies on the AB 617 Truck Reroute Study to support its claim that the SCSP’s increase to transportation hazards from design features or incompatible uses impacts, Impact 4.15-3, will be less than significant. FEIR 2-146, Comment 10-47. The FEIR denies having relied on the Reroute Study for this purpose—it argues that the Reroute Study was still in progress when the DEIR was drafted and therefore could not have been relied on. This is contradicted by the fact the DEIR’s discussion of Impact 4.15-3 describes how implementation of the recommendations from the traffic study along with application of SCSP policies and the City’s development design standards will together reduce the significance of this impact.

DEIR at 4.15-16.

Our letter further explains that residents have causes for concern that the Reroute Study will increase, and not reduce, truck safety hazards in the Plan Area and near sensitive receptors. FEIR at 2-147, Comment 10-47. This is because it plans to divert heavy duty traffic from some areas of Fresno, which will increase traffic in portions of the Plan Area, and the study does not limiting truck traffic via its “Truck Regulated Areas” in parts of the Plan Area where people live and go to school. Id. The FEIR acknowledges this comment (FEIR at 2-169, Response 10-47), but then includes a cross

City Council
December 3, 2024

reference to Master Response 6, which fails to address it (FEIR at 2-8 and 2-9). Master Response 6 does not address concerns about truck traffic being diverted on to routes on Cedar Avenue and North Avenue near existing residences. Additionally, the Reroute Study will continue to allow heavy trucks to access warehouse in regulated areas, if those trucks are not through traffic. Because the SCSP and Reroute Study are closely related plans, and especially in light of the Reroute Study’s potential to increase traffic near sensitive receptors in the Plan Area, the DEIR erred in not conducting an analysis of SCSP and Reroute Study’s cumulative safety risks. This omission renders its cumulative impacts analysis deficient and its conclusion that no mitigation is needed invalid.

E. The FEIR Fails to Provide an Adequate Analysis of the Project’s Potentially Significant Cumulative Impacts
Our letter explained that the DEIR’s cumulative impacts analysis for air quality, public health, climate change, public safety and noise is deficient because it fails to include the Caltrans South Fresno State Route 99 (“SR 99”) Corridor Project. FEIR at 2- 150, Comment 10-51. The SR 99 project will add significant capacity to the North Avenue interchange in the center of the Plan Area and to the American Avenue interchange one mile southeast. Our letter attached as Exhibit K the extensive comments, including an expert report from Dr. Amy Lee and Regan Patterson, that Friends of Calwa, Inc. and Fresno Building Healthy Communities submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) on July 14, 2024. Those explain how the SR 99 project will more than double capacity for heavy duty trucks and cars to travel between SR 99 and local South Fresno roadways and will add thousands of daily truck trips to the area, increasing associated environmental harms. Id. They further explain how the SR 99 project “will significantly worsen existing air quality burdens and poor health outcomes for South Fresno residents by inducing even more heavy-duty truck and car traffic and new and intensified industrial development.” Id. at 20. The comments describe how “a robust scientific literature … establish[es] that highway expansion projects like” the SR 99 project “‘spur[] more vehicle travel on the highway’ by increasing highway accessibility and reducing travel costs and burden, as well as spurring ‘land development activity’ that in turn contributes even more truck and car traffic.” Id. at 2.

The FEIR fails to substantively address these comments and ignores the information in our letter and Exhibit K that the SR 99 project would induce diesel truck travel. Instead, the FEIR asserts that its cumulative impacts analysis passes muster because it purportedly used the “plan” approach to identify the cumulative setting identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15130(b)(1)(B), rather than using a list of past, present, and future probable projects, under CEQA Guidelines section 15130(b)(1)(A).

FEIR at 2-170, Response 10-51. Under this “plan” approach, an EIR’s cumulative

City Council
December 3, 2024

impacts analysis is based on a summary of projections in a relevant planning document.

The City claims that the DEIR’s cumulative analysis considered development that is anticipated to occur in accordance with the City’s General Plan and that individual projects, including the SR 99 project, were therefore not identified in the DEIR. Id.

However, the DEIR’s cumulative impact section fails to actually describe how the City’s 2014 General Plan, which was adopted a decade ago, fully “describes or evaluates conditions contributing to the cumulative effect” of the SCSP, including the SR 99 project. CEQA Guidelines § 15130(b)(1)(B); see also Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1217 (“[t]he summary-of- projections approach may present problems if the projections in the general plan or related planning document are inaccurate or outdated”). Moreover the City’s General Plan includes no discussion of Caltrans’ SR 99 project or even a general discussion of plans to update or expand freeway infrastructure within the City.

When analyzing the cumulative impacts of specific environmental impact areas, the SCSP EIR generally does not actually use a summary of projections from the City’s General Plan. For example, in its cumulative impacts analysis for transportation hazards, the SCSP EIR does not even mention consistency with its General Plan, much less evaluate the SCSP’s impacts in conjunction with those of transportation-related projections in the General Plan. Instead, it simply claims that “[i]n general, transportation hazards are site-specific and not cumulative in nature.” DEIR at 5-17. It then concludes that cumulative transportation hazard impacts will be less than significant because “[a]ll transportation related infrastructure improvements constructed under the [SCSP] would be subject to and designed in accordance with all applicable design standards” and because “[o]ther nearby projects within the public right-of-way would also be required to comply with the City’s construction standards.” Id. It is unclear what “other projects” are included in this analysis, or how adherence to design standards would prevent exacerbating dangers at traffic hazard hotspots. Likewise, the DEIR’s cumulative impacts analysis for operational noise fails to mention the General Plan, and makes a vague statement that “combined with traffic from other development in the area, additional increases in transportation noise would occur.”
In these instances, the City’s cumulative impacts analysis does not appear to follow either of the two permissible methods under CEQA Guidelines section 15130(b)(1). It does not include a list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, nor does it include a summary of projections contained in an adopted relevant planning document that describes or evaluates conditions contributing to the cumulative effect. The City was therefore unjustified in refusing to consider the cumulative impacts of the SR 99 project in the SCSP EIR, which

City Council
December 3, 2024

as a result fails to disclose the extent and severity of cumulative impacts of heavy duty truck traffic from the Hwy 99 project. See Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control, 124 Cal.App.4th at 1217 (“[u]se of a planning document” as a basis for cumulative impacts analysis “does not preclude challenge to the accuracy or sufficiency of” that analysis).

Our letter also commented that the cumulative impact analysis for noise further erred in making an unsupported assertion that “no additional mitigation is available beyond what is identified” in the document. FEIR at 2-150, Comment 10-52; DEIR at 5-

14. Our letter proposed several mitigation strategies that could have been incorporated into the SCSP, including establishing a prohibition on truck traffic traveling through residential areas. FEIR at 2-150 to 2-151, Comment 10-52. The FEIR fails to evaluate the feasibility of these proposals, and incorrectly claims that the Plan already includes the suggested mitigation. FEIR at 2-170, Response 10-52. It does not. It then claims that “[n]o element of [that] project would generate additional truck traffic.” This assertion ignores the extensive comments and expert report we submitted as Exhibit K to our DEIR letter with evidence to the contrary, as described above. Lacking a reasoned basis for that conclusion, the FEIR cannot therefore claim that the City need not mitigate for cumulative noise impacts of the SR 99 project and the SCSP.

III. The FEIR Must Be Revised and Recirculated.

Under California law, the present FEIR cannot properly form the basis of a final EIR. CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines describe the circumstances that require recirculation of a EIR. Such circumstances include whether, as is the case here, the EIR is so “fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.” CEQA Guidelines § 15088.5.

Here, as this letter explains, the FEIR fails to adequately reveal or describe the true extent of numerous significant environmental impacts, which clearly requires extensive new information and analysis. This analysis will likely result in the identification of new, substantial environmental impacts or substantial increases in the severity of significant environmental impacts. Once the EIR reveals the full extent of the Specific Plan’s impacts, the City should consider land use designation changes that to lessen such impacts.

IV. Conclusion
Given the numerous adverse environmental impacts not fully disclosed and properly analyzed in the EIR, the Leadership Counsel opposes the Project as proposed.

Implementing the Project as proposed would exacerbate the already significant adverse

City Council
December 3, 2024

impacts suffered by South Central Fresno residents. As described above, the EIR violates CEQA in numerous respects. Unfortunately, the impact of the CEQA violations will be felt most acutely by the City’s most vulnerable residents: low-income residents and communities of color. Through the environmental review process, the City has an opportunity to develop a Specific Plan that minimizes the Project’s significant impacts and complies with CEQA, while at the same time ensuring that the most disadvantaged neighborhoods in South Central Fresno do not bear the burdens of the City’s growth.

The Leadership Counsel respectfully urges the City to delay further consideration of this Project until the City makes the requisite changes as described in our comments, and as requested by residents of the SCSP area, and prepares and recirculates a revised DEIR that fully complies with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. On behalf of the Leadership Counsel, we thank you for the opportunity to review the FEIR, and thank you for considering and addressing these comments before taking further action.

Very truly yours,

SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP

Edward T. Schexnayder

Cc:

Robert Swanson, Deputy Attorney General, Bureau of Environmental Justice, California Attorney General’s Office,
Brian Moore, Air Resources Supervisor, CARB,
Ryan Hayashi, Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer, SJVAPCD, g
Sophia Pagoulatos, Planning Manager,
Georgeanne White, City Manager, C
City Council Members

City Council
December 3, 2024

Exhibits:

Exhibit A: Baseline Environmental, Inc. Report with resume Exhibit B: South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2009. Pilot Study of High Performance Air Filtration for Classrooms Applications.

Exhibit C: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2016. Planning Healthy Places.

EXHIBIT A

| | www.baseline-env.com
Mailing Address:

July 29, 2024
23213‐00

Carmen J. Borg
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP

Subject:  Review of the Air Quality Impacts for the Fresno South Central Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report
Dear Ms. Borg:

Baseline Environmental Consulting (Baseline) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) prepar
ed by Ascent for the proposed South Central Specific Plan (SCSP) in the City of Fresno, California. The SCSP area (Plan Area) encompasses 5,567 acres located just south and southeast of Downtown Fresno. Based on our review of the Draft EIR, we have identified substantial flaws in the analysis used to support the significance dete rminations and evaluation of mitigation measures for air quality impacts related to development in the Plan Area, as described in detail below.

Unsubstantiated Estimates of Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions As described on page 4.3‐17 of the Draft EIR, two construction scenarios (herein referred to as “Construction Scenario 1” and “Construction Scenario 2”) were used to evaluate emissions of criteria air pollutants associated with proposed development in the Plan Area:
 Construction Scenario 1: Construction of 25 percent of all the proposed la nd uses would be completed in the year 2024.
 Construction Scenario 2: Construction of 75 percent of all the proposed land uses would be evenly distributed between 2025 and 2040.

As described in the Draft EIR, Construction Scenario 1 is considered a worst‐case scenario and is based on guidance from the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) for conducting a program‐level analysis of criteria air pollutant emissions.1 Construction Scenario 2 is not recommended by the SMAQMD and justification for evaluating this scenario was not provided in the Draft EIR. Construction Scenario 2 only considered 75

1 Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management, 2021. Guide to Air Quality Assessment in Sacramento County.

Available at: https://www.airquality.org/residents/ceqa‐land‐use‐planning/ceqa‐guidance‐tools. Revised April.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

percent of the proposed land uses to estimate the long‐term average criteria air pollutant emissions from development under the proposed plan. However, for the purposes of estimating the long‐term average criteria air pollutant emissions, modeling 100 percent of the proposed land uses over the plan horizon per
iod would provide a substantially more
representative scenario.

Additionally, according to Tables 4.3‐4 and 4.3‐5 in the Draft EIR, the maximum annual emissions of criteria air pollutants estimated under Construction Scenarios 1 and 2 would be below the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Contr ol District’s (SJVAPCD) thresholds of significance. However, there are substantial errors in the modeling results for both construction scenarios. These errors and corrected analyses are presented below.

Construction Scenario 1
As described on page 4.3‐17 of the Draft EIR, CalEEMod was used to estimate the criteria air pollutant emissions during construction of the pr oposed land uses in the Plan Area. CalEEMod utilizes models widely accepted by regulatory agencies to estimate emissions of criteria air pollutants. CalEEMod provides default construction schedules and equipment profiles (equipment type, hours of activity, etc.) based on the size of the proposed development. The default construction schedule and  equipment profile are derived from a survey of over 50 construction sites in California. The CalEEMod default construction parameters can be modified based on site‐specific information, but the user is required to provide substantial evidence to justify all changes from the default model settings.

Under Construction Scenario 1, the def ault schedule in CalEEMod for construction of 25 percent of the proposed land uses in the Plan Area is about eight years. Because Construction Scenario 1 requires construction to be completed in one year, the Draft EIR modified the default schedule in CalEEMod from eight years to one year. Howev er, the Draft EIR analysis did not increase the intensity of construction equipment and vehicle use that would be needed to complete eight years of construction activities within one year.

To help demonstrate this concept, a hypothetical example is provided in Table 1. In this example, the default equipment schedule and profile in CalEEMod indicate that one excavator would be required to demolish a building in two weeks (10 work days). The default schedule could presumably be reduced to one week if a second excavator is used at the site to help complete the work in half the time. By increasing the intensity of equipment use in  proportion to the corresponding reduction in the schedule, the overall level of effort required to demolish the building remains the same. However, the Draft EIR analysis did not increase the intensity of equipment use to maintain the level of effort required when reducing the default construction schedule from eight year
s to one year. As a result, seven years of the default construction activity are unaccounted for in the Draft EIR analysis, and the level of effort required to complete Construction Scenario 1 is underestimated by about 87.5 percent.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

Table 1.  Hypothetical Example of Modifying CalEEMod Default Construction Parameters CalEEMod Scenarios  Equipment
Total
Days
Hours
per Day  Amount
Total
Hours
Default Effort
Maintained?
Default Model   Excavator  10  8  1  80  ‐‐‐
Modified Model (incorrect)  Excavator  5  8  1  40  No
Modified Model (correct)  Excavator  5  8  2  80  Yes
Notes: Incorrect parameter shown in red font and correct parameter shown in green front.

Baseline has prepared an updated analysis of criteria air pollutant emissions for Construction Scenario 1 that uses the same input parameters as the Draft EIR but increases the default intensity of equipment and vehicle use for each phase of construction in proportion to the reduction in the default schedule. As documented in Attachment A, the default construction phases were modified to be evenly distributed throughout one calendar year (260 work days) and the default off‐road construction equipment activity and daily vehicle trips for workers and vendors were scaled for each phase of construction to maintain the overall level of effort required to comple
te Construction Scenario 1. As shown in Table 2, the estimated emissions of reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) for Construction Scenario 1 would exceed the SJVAPCD thresholds, resulting in substantially more severe criteria air pollutant impacts than analyzed in the Draft EIR. Furthermore, the emissions are up to 597 percent higher than the unsubst
antiated results reported in the Draft EIR. As a result, the Draft EIR did not properly disclose the severity of potential air quality impacts to the public associated with Construction Scenario 1.

Table 2.  Corrected Analysis of Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions for Construction Scen ario 1 (tons per year, 2024)
Scenario  ROG  NOx  CO  SOx  PM10  PM2.5
Draft EIR Analysis1  8.2  5.0  7.6  0.02  1.6  0.5
Updated Analysis2  13.2  27.6  52.9  0.07  9.1  3.0
Percent Change   61%  448%  597%  250%  464%  482%
SJVAPCD Thresholds  10  10  100  100  15  15
Notes: Bold font with orange shading indicates the value exceeds the threshold. 1 See Table 4.3‐4 and Appendix B of the Draft EIR.
2 See CalEEMod report in Attachment A.

Construction Scenario 2
Under Construction Scenario 2, the default schedule in CalEEMod for construction of 75 percent of the proposed land uses in the Plan Area is about 24 years. Like Construction Scenario 1, the Draft EIR reduced the default schedule to one year. There are several major errors associated with this approach.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

First, the Draft EIR analysis provides no explanation for why the construction schedule would need to be reduced to one year, when the methodology on page 4.3‐17 of the Draft EIR indicates that the construction would be evenly distributed over 15 years between 2025 and

2040. Second, the Draft EIR analysis failed to increase the intensity of equipment use to maintain the level of effort required to reduce the default construction schedule from 24 years to one year. As a result, the Draft EIR analysis underestimated the level of effort required to comple
te Construction Scenario 2 by about 95.8 percent. Third, the Draft EIR analysis divided the criteria air pollutant emissions estimated for one year of construction by 15 years, which is equivalent to the timespan from 2025 to the buildout horizon in 2040. Presumably, this was intended to calculate the average annual emissions over a 15‐year period, which would be an egregious er
ror given that the analysis already neglected to account for 23 of the 24 years of default construction activity. Essentially, the Draft EIR estimated the emissions for only 1/24th of the default construction activity required to complete Construction Scenario 2, and then divided that fraction of emissions by an additional 15 years without any justification. Finally, the Draft EIR claimed that the estimated emissions presented in Table 4.3‐5 represent the “maximum annual emissions” after apparently attempting (and failing) to calculate the average annual emissions over 15 years.

Baseline has prepared a corrected analysis for a modified Construction Scenario 2 that accounts for the construction of 100 percent of the proposed land uses in the Plan Area (instead of 75 percent) spread evenly between 2024 and 2040. The purpose of this modified scenario is to provide a representative evaluation of both the maximum and average annual criteria air pollutant emissions when construc
tion is spread evenly over the plan horizon period. Similar to the updated analysis for Construction Scenario 1, Baseline reduced the default construction schedule in CalEEMod to fit between 2024 and 2040 and increased the default  intensity of equipment and vehicle use for each phase of construction in proportion to the reduction in the default schedule. As shown in Table 3, the estimated maximum and average annual emissions of NOx for modified Construction Scenario 2 would exceed the SJVAPCD threshold, resulting in a substantially more seve
re impact than analyzed in the Draft EIR.

Table 3.  Corrected Analysis of Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions for Modified Construction Scenario 2 (tons per year, 2024 ‐ 2040)
Emission Scenario  ROG  NOx  CO  SOx  PM10  PM2.5
Maximum Annual Emissions1  6.5  15.7  41.1  0.04  7.3  2.0 Average Annual Emissions1  5.0  11.6  27.5  0.04  7.2  1.9 SJVAPCD Thresholds  10  10  100  27  15  15
Notes: Bold font with orange shading indicate the value exceeds the threshold. 1 See CalEEMod report in Attachment A.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

False Statement about Construction Health Risks

to toxic air contaminants (TACs), such as diesel particulate matter (PM), during construction:

Considering the relatively short duration in which diesel PM‐emitting construction activity would take place at any given location in the Plan Area, the dist ance to the nearest sensitive receptors, and the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM, construction‐related TAC emissions for any given project would not expose existing sensitive receptors to an incremental increase in cancer risk greater than 20 in 1 million or a hazard index greater than 1.0.

This statement is unsubstantiated. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA
), there is valid scientific concern regarding the health effects on children exposed to airborne carcinogens such as diesel PM from construction activities lasting more than six months. This is because children are about 10 times more susceptible to health effects from exposure to TACs tha
n adults.2 In addition, when accounting for the higher breathing rate per body mass and higher fraction of time at home for a child versus an adult, a child is about 48 times more susceptible to cancer risk from exposure to TACs than an adult. This means a child exposed to one year of diesel PM emissions from construction would have the equivalent cancer risk to an adult exposed
to the same level of diesel PM emissions over 48 years.

Therefore, the “relatively short duration” of construction activities is not substantial evidence for dismissing construction‐related health risks, especially in regard to the health risks posed to nearby child
ren.

Furthermore, there are numerous health risk assessments in California that demonstrate sensitive receptors exposed to diesel PM during construction can result in a cancer risk greater than 20 in a million. For example, the 2022 San Francisco Housing Element Update Environmental Impact Report (Housing Element EIR) evaluate d the potential cancer risk for sensitive receptors exposed to a wide range of construction projects proposed under the plan.

For the hypothetical construction of a 120,000‐square‐foot building, the Housing Element EIR estimated that the cancer risk associated with construction could range from 173 in a million for adjacent sensitive receptors to 21 in a million for sensitive receptors locate d 100 meters
(328 feet) from the site.3 Therefore, there is substantial evidence to support that individual construction projects can result in a cancer risk greater than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of 20 in a

2 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. February. 3 San Francisco Planning Department, 2022. San Francisco Housing Element 2022 Update, Draft Environmental Impact Report, Appendix I, Air Quality Supporting Information. Available at: https://rb.gy/k00xs5 April 20.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

million. Again, the Draft EIR has failed to disclose the severity of potential air quality impacts to the public associated construction of proposed land uses in the Plan Area.

Inadequate Analysis of Operational Vehicle Health Risks

facilities with high truck use in the Plan Area. The Draft EIR states that “the operation of trucks accessing the Plan Area could result in exposure to receptors that could cumulatively combine to generate a cancer risk exceeding 20  in one million or a hazard index greater than 1.0.” The Draft EIR failed to evaluate potential health risks associated with emissions of total organic gases from passenger vehicles. According to an analysis prepared to support the San Francisco Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Guidelines,4 the following types of development projects would require a health risk assessment because they could generate new passenger vehicle trips that expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations:
 Projects that would result in primarily passenger vehicle trips (e.g., residential, office, mixed use residential and office) above 1,150 vehicles per day; or  Projects that would generate a mix of new car and trucks with volumes above 225 vehicles/day.

Therefore, the
re is substantial evidence to support that passenger vehicles in urban areas can also pose significant health risk impacts to sensitive receptors. The health risk impacts associated with emissions of total organic gases from passenger vehicles were not assessed in the Draft EIR.

Improper Application of the Project‐Level Cancer Risk Threshold

TAC impacts would be significant if development under the proposed plan would expose the public to substantial levels of TACs so that the probability of contracting cancer for the Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI) exceeds 20 in 1 million or an acute or chronic Hazard Index that equals or
exceeds 1 for the MEI for non‐carcinogens.

It should first be noted that this definition should be revised to match the SJVAPCD’s recommended project‐level cancer risk threshold:5

4 San Francisco Planning Department, 2024. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Guidelines. Available at https://sfplanning.org/air‐quality. July.
5 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2015. Air Quality Thresholds of Significance‐Toxic Air Contaminants. Available at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/2lpbkso0/2‐cms‐format‐air‐quality‐thresholds‐of‐ significance‐toxic‐air‐contaminants.pdf. July 13.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 20 in one million.

The Draft EIR uses the SJVAPCD’s project‐level cancer risk threshold to separately evaluate the following three sources of TAC emissions associated with proposed land uses in the Plan Area:
1) Construction
2) Operational Permitted Sources
3) Operational Truck Activity
To address potential health risks associated with these three sources of TACs, the Draft EIR includes Mitigation Measures 4.3‐3a, 4.3‐3b, and 4.3‐3c which require future projects in the
Plan Area to prepare and implement the recommendations of a site‐specific health risk assessment to ensure that the cancer risk to nearby sensitive receptors associated with that source is at or below the SJVAPCD’ s threshold of 20 in one million.

The Draft EIR has erroneously applied the SJVAPCD’s project‐level cancer risk threshold in a piecemeal fashion to three sources of TACs associated with an individual project. The cancer risk from multiple sources attributed to a single project is a cumulative condition. For example, if
a child in a nearby residence is exposed to diesel PM during project construction, their lifetime cancer risk associated with the project does not reset when construction ends and operation begins but continues to increase. The total cancer risk to a nearby to sensitive receptor attributed to an individual project should be based on the comb ined cancer risk from exposure to TACs from construction, operational permitted sources, operational truck activity, and other sources. This total cancer risk should then be compared to the project‐level cancer risk threshold of 20 in one million. By applying the cancer risk threshold in a piecemeal fashion to each source
of project‐related TAC emissions, the Draft EIR has allowed individual projects to generate a total cancer risk as high as 60 in a million at nearby sensitive receptors.6 This level of pollution exposure is not supported by the SJVAPCD, and is especially unacceptable given the extremely high levels of existing poor air quality and pollution burden in the South‐Central Fresno community, as discussed below.

Failure to Protect the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community Assembly Bill 617 (AB 617) aims to help protect air quality and public health in communities that are disproportionately affected by air pollution. The bill requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to identify heavily polluted communities suffering from a high exposure burden and directs regional air districts to focus air quality improvement  efforts through implementation of community air monitoring plans and adoption of emission reduction programs within these identified areas.

6 20 in a million for construction + 20 in a million for permitted sources + 20 in a million for truck activity = 60 in a million.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

Fresno County has some of the nation’s greatest environmental inequalities. In 2022, the City of Fresno had the highest short‐term particle pollution, second highest year‐round particle pollution, and fourth highest ozone pollution in the nation. 7 According to the state’s
CalEnviroScreen model, the South‐Central Fresno community in particular has a high cumulative air pollution exposure burden that has adversely affected census tracts designated as disadvantaged communities. The CalEnviroScreen model uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic information to produce scores for every census tract in the state. An area with a high overall score is one that experiences a much higher pollution burden than areas with low
scores. The average overall CalEnviroScreen score in the South‐Central Fresno community is above the 97th percentile.8 Due to the high cumulative air pollution exposure burden, the South‐Central Fresno community was selected by CARB for enrollment in the AB 617 program.

As acknowledged on pages 4.3‐12 and 4.3‐28 of the Draft EIR, the Plan Area is located within the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community and the proposed plan  would introduce new sources of TACs that could exacerbate the already adverse conditions of the disadvantaged community. However, the subsequent methodology and analysis of air quality impacts presented in the Draft EIR fail to make any further connection to account for the existing poor air quality and pollution burden that exists in the South‐Central Fresno Community. Specific concerns related to air q
uality impacts in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community are presented below.

Existing Air Quality in the AB 617 Community
The Draft EIR analysis did not consider critical information about the existing air quality (i.e., baseline cond
itions) in the Plan Area and surrounding communities related to freeways and high‐volume roadways. In April 2024, the SJVAPCD and City of Fresno completed the South‐ Central Fresno AB 617 Community Truck Reroute Study: Truck Routing and Implementation Strategies Report (Truck Reroute Study) which recommends specific strategies to mitigate negative freight impacts, improve air quality, and improve the overall quality of life for members of the South
‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community. The Truck Reroute Study is supported by a Health Impact Assessment within the City of Fresno (Fresno HIA) that was published in April 2024.9 The primary objective of the Fresno HIA was to assess the impact of air pollution (in relation to truck traffic) on the risk of common health outcomes, including infant mortality, preterm delivery, asthma, and cardio cerebral vascular events in the city of Fresno.

7 UC Merced Community and Labor Center, 2024. Fresno Community Environmental Health Impact Assessment.

Available at: https://clc.ucmerced.edu/sites/clc.ucmerced.edu/files/page/documents/fresno_hia_report.pdf. April. 8 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2019. Community Emissions Reduction Program; South Central Fresno. Available at: https://community.valleyair.org/media/1516/01finalscfresnocerp‐9‐19‐19.pdf. September 19. 9 UC Merced Community and Labor Center, 2024. Fresno Community Environmental Health Impact Assessment.

Available at: https://clc.ucmerced.edu/sites/clc.ucmerced.edu/files/page/documents/fresno_hia_report.pdf. April.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

One of the key findings from the Fresno HIA was that pregnant people who lived within 1,000 feet of a freeway, 1,000 feet of a truck route, or 300 feet of a major road had significantly higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, includ
ing preterm birth and infant mortality. Based
on these findings, the Truck Reroute Study applied a 1,000‐foot buffer around proposed truck routes to determine where truck emissions could pose health risks to residential areas in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community. As shown in Figure 1, the 1,000‐foot buffer distance around the proposed truck routes would affect many sensitive receptors in the Plan Area.

It should be noted that the Fresno HIA did not evaluate excess cancer risk associated with diesel PM emissions along proposed truck routes in the Plan Area. In 2015, a health risk assessment was prepared for the Downtown Neighborhoods Community Plan (DNCP) in the City of Fresno,10 which is located adjacent and to the north of the Plan Area. The study modeled diesel PM concentrations from vehicle emissions along State Route (SR) 99, SR 41, and SR 180 in the DNCP area and found that the existing cancer risk to sensitive receptors exceeded 100 in a million at distances ranging  from about 1,000 to 5,000 feet from the freeways.

The Draft EIR should be revised to evaluate the existing air quality conditions for sensitive receptors in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community related to mobile‐source TAC emissions, as well as other sources of TAC emissions (e.g., railroads and  stationary sources).

Cancer Risk Thresholds Protective of the AB 617 Community Air quality impacts and resulting human health risks are by their very nature cumulative impacts. Emissions from past, present, and future projects contribute cumulatively to health risks for sensitive receptors. To evaluate health risk impacts from a new development under the proposed plan, the Draft EIR must consider the existing health risks in the community plus the additional hea
lth risks that would be experienced by sensitive receptors because of new development. Based on cumulative health risks, the Draft EIR must also define what “substantial air pollutant concentrations” are with respect to TACs that ca use cancer and other adverse health effects in the community.

In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the Draft EIR evaluated if development under the proposed plan would expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations. In particular, the Draft EIR used the SJVAPCD’s project‐leve l cancer risk threshold of 20 in a million to evaluate if the proposed plan would introduce new sources of TACs “that could exacerbate the already adverse air quality conditions” in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community (pages 4.3‐28 through 4.3‐33).

10 FirstCarbon Solutions, 2015.  Health Risk Assessment Report: Downtown Neighborhoods Community Plan, Fulton Corridor Specific Plan, and the Downtown Development Code Project, City of Fresno, Fresno County, California. Available at: https://www.fresno.gov/wp‐content/uploads/2023/04/AppEAQASMBLD.pdf.

November 12.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

According to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(c):

When adopting or using thresholds of significance, a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies or recommended by experts, provided the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.

Ther
e does not appear to be any substantial evidence to support the use of the SJVAPCD’s project‐level cancer risk threshold of 20 in a million to evaluate how development under the proposed plan could exacerbate the already adverse air quality conditions in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community and expo
se sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant
concentrations. This is because the threshold does not account for the following:
 Existing levels of air pollution and health risks in Plan Area;  Communities of color experiencing higher health risks for the same exposures to pollution in the Plan Area;11 and
 The cumulative health risks associated with exposure to air pollution.

Regarding cumulative cancer risk, the San Francisco Planning Department defines areas with substantial air pollutant concentrations based on a cancer risk of 100 in a million, which is consistent with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s guidance for air toxic analyses at the com
munity‐scale level. However, the San Francisco Planning Department also applies a more stringent definition of substantial air pollutant concentrations based on a cancer risk of 90 in a million in areas of the city with the highest percentage of health vulnerable residents (i.e., disadvantaged communities). To define areas with  substantial air pollutant concentrations, San Francisco Environmental Planning has effectively considered the existing air quality conditions, the existing health risks in the community including receptors more vulnerable to air pollution, and the cumulative health risks associated with exposure to air pollution from new development.12
After defining areas with substantial air pollutant concentrations, the Draft EIR must determine a project‐level cancer risk threshold that would represent a substantial health risk contribution from new development under the proposed plan. For example, San Francisco Environmental Planning defines project‐level cancer risk thresholds based on the following two scenarios (as paraphrased):

11 UC Merced Community and Labor Center, 2024. Fresno Community Environmental Health Impact Assessment.

Available at: https://clc.ucmerced.edu/sites/clc.ucmerced.edu/files/page/documents/fresno_hia_report.pdf. April. 12 San Francisco Planning Department, 2024. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Guidelines. Available at https://sfplanning.org/air‐quality. July.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

1. If the existing health risks at receptors do not exceed the substantial pollutant concentrations defined for the area (e.g., cancer risk of 90 or 100 in a million) but would meet or exceed with the project, then an excess cancer risk at or above 10 per million from a project is considered a substantial health risk contribution.

2. If the existing health risks at receptors alread
y meet or exceed the substantial pollutant
concentrations defined for the area (e.g., cancer risk of 90 or 100 in a million), then an excess cancer risk at or above 7 per million from a project is considered a substantial health
risk contribution.

The South Coast Air Quality Management District is currently developing updated guidance for evaluating cumulative air quality impacts from increased concentrations of TACs for projects in the South Coast Air Basin. The guidance is considering a ran ge of project‐level cancer risk thresholds ranging from as low as 1 in a million to as high as 10 in a million based on the existing cancer risks from air pollution in the basin, proximity to high volume diesel‐fueled mobile sources, and the protection of AB 617 communities, as well as other crit eria.13 The project‐level cancer risk thresholds for San Francisco and the South Coast Air Basin account for existing air quality conditions, existing health risks in the community including receptors more vulnerable to air pollution, and the cumulative health risks to sensitive receptors associated with exposure to substantial air pollutant concentrations from new development. In addition, these project‐le
vel thresholds are far more stringent than the cancer risk threshold of 20 in a million used in the Draft EIR analysis. Given that the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community experiences similar or more severe air pollution burden than communities in San Francisco and the South  Coast Air Basin (e.g., Los Angeles), the Draft EIR should be revised to use a more conservative project‐level cancer risk threshold that is supported by substantial evidence to evaluate if development under the proposed plan would expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations based on existing conditions in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community.

New Sensitive Receptors Exposed to Toxic Air Contamin
ants in the AB 617 Community

residential land uses or other sensitive receptors within 500 feet of SR 99 and SR 41, which is the setback distance CARB r
ecommends near freeways and urban roads with more than
100,000 vehicles per day. As a result, the Draft EIR concluded that mobile‐source exposure from development under the proposed plan would not generate a cancer risk greater than 20 in 1 million at the location of sensitive receptors. Thi
s is an unsubstantiated conclusion because

13 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2024. Working Group Meeting #5: Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics for CEQA Projects. Available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules‐compliance/ceqa/ceqa‐policy‐ development‐(new). March 20.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

there are existing residential land uses adjacent to SR 41 that would be supported by future development (or redevelopment) under the proposed plan (see Figure 3‐6 of the Draft EIR).

In addition, CARB’s recommended 500‐foot setback distance is not based on the SJVAPCD’s health risk thresholds for TACs. As discussed above, the Fres no HIA for the Truck Reroute Study
found that non‐carcinogenic health risk impacts to sensitive receptors in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community extend up to about 1,000 feet from the freeways and major roadways.  As shown in Figure 1, the 1,000‐foot buffer distance around the propose d truck routes in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community would affect many more sensitive receptors in the Plan Area than the 500‐foot setback around SR 99 and SR 41 that was evaluated in the Draft EIR.

Figure 1.  Proposed Truck Routes with 1,000‐foot Buffer in the Plan Area

Notes: Boundaries are approximate.

The base map and associated key (e.g., yellow indicates residential area) is derived from Figure 3‐6 of the Draft EIR * 500‐foot buffer shown based on the Draft EIR Air Quality Analysis. ** 1,000‐foot buffer shown based on the Truck Reroute Study.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

There are also many published health risk assessments and models, such as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s Mobile Source Screening Map, 14 that show mobile‐source cancer
risks exceeding 20 in a million at sensitive receptors located far beyond 500 feet from freeways and high‐volume roadways. As discussed above, a health risk assessment prepared for the DNCP found that the existing cancer risk to sensitive receptors exceeded 100 in a million at distances up to about 5,000 feet from the freewa
ys. The study recommended that any new
residential development in areas with a cancer risk above 100 in a million incorporate Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 13 or higher ventilation systems to remove outdoor diesel PM from indoor air. The City of San Francisco has adopted  a similar requirement for incorporating MERV 13 ventilation systems for new residential development within areas with elevated air pollution, including areas where the cancer risk is above 100 in a million.

The Draft EIR should be revised to evaluate health risks to new sensitive receptors exposed to existing air pollution based on the findings of previous studies in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community. Base
d on the findings of these studies, the Draft EIR should evaluate and mitigate potential air quality impacts to new sensitive receptors in the Plan Area.

Existing Sensitive Receptors Exposed to Toxic Air Contamin ants in the AB 617 Community According to page 4.3‐29 of the Draft EIR, development anticipated under the proposed plan would generate an additional 72,241 trips per day. Presumably a high percentage of these trips would be trucks traveling along the freeways throughout the Plan Area, as well as other portions of the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community, whic h extends beyond the Plan Area,
where there are higher densities of residential receptors near the freeway (e.g., the DNCP area). The Draft EIR should be revised to evaluate the health risks for existing sensitive receptors in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community (and  not just the Plan Area) that would be exposed to the cumulative mobile‐source TAC emissions generated by the proposed plan.

Conclusion
In summary, the following flaws have been identified in the Draft EIR analysis used to support the significance determinations and evaluation of mitigation measures for air quality impacts related to development under the proposed plan:
 The Draft EIR did not properly estimate and disclose the severity of potential criteria air pollutant impacts to the public associated with construction.  The Draft EIR made fals
e statements regarding potential health risks from construction and mobile‐source TAC emissions and the location of sensitive receptors within 500 feet of a freeway.

14 https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans‐and‐climate/california‐environmental‐quality‐act‐ceqa/ceqa‐tools/health‐risk‐ screening‐and‐modeling.

Ms. Carmen J. Borg
July 29, 2024

 The Draft EIR failed to evaluate potential health risks associated with passenger vehicles.
 The Draft EIR erroneously applied the SJVAPCD’s project‐level cancer risk threshold in a piecemeal fashion, allowing individual projects to generate a total cancer risk as high as 60 in a million (instead of 20 in million) at nearby sensitive rece ptors.  The Draft EIR analysis did not incorporate critical findings from the Truck Reroute Study, Fresno HIA, and DNCP regarding the severity of existing air quality and health risk conditions in the Plan Area and South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community.  The Draft EIR did not apply a project‐level cancer risk threshold supported by substantial evidenc
e to evaluate how development under the proposed plan could exacerbate the existing air quality conditions and cumulative health risks in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community and expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations.
 The Draft EIR analysis did not properly evaluat e the cumulative health risks for new sensitive receptors that would be exposed to TAC emissions in the Plan Area.  The Draft EIR analysis did not evaluate the cumulative health risks to existing sensitive receptors in the South‐Central Fresno AB 617 Community that would be exposed to mobile‐
source TAC emissions generated by the proposed plan.

Based on our review of the Draft EIR, a revised EIR should be prepared and recirculated for public review to properly evaluate and mitigate air quality impacts associated with development under the proposed plan.

Sincerely,

Patrick Sutton
Principal Environmental Engineer

ATTACHMENT A

1806241.1
Construction Scenario 1 Scale Adjustment Factors for CalEEMod Phase Name
Days Per
Week Start Date End  Date
Work Days
per Phase Start Date End  Date
Work Days
per Phase
Demolition 5 1/1/2024 5/20/2024 100 1/1/2024 12/31/2024 260 0.38 Site Preparation 5 5/21/2024 8/13/2024 60 5/21/2024 12/31/2024 260 0.23 Grading 5 8/14/2024 3/19/2025 155 8/14/2024 12/31/2024 260 0.60 Building Construction 5 3/20/2025 2/27/2031 1,550 3/20/2025 12/31/2024 260 5.96 Paving 5 2/28/2031 8/1/2031 110 2/28/2031 12/31/2024 260 0.42 Architectural Coating 5 8/2/2031 1/3/2032 110 8/2/2031 12/31/2024 260 0.42 Construction Scenario 1 Modified Off‐Road Equipment Activity for CalEEMod Phase Name
Default
Number
per Day
Default
Hours
Per Day
Default
Total Hours of
Use
Modified
Number
per Day
Modified
Hours
per Day*
Modified
Total Hours of
Use
Demolition 2 8 1,600 2 3.08 1,600
Demolition 3 8 2,400 3 3.08 2,400
Demolition 1 8 800 1 3.08 800
Site Preparation 3 8 1,440 3 1.85 1,440
Site Preparation 4 8 1,920 4 1.85 1,920
Grading 1 8 1,240 1 4.77 1,240
Grading 2 8 2,480 2 4.77 2,480
Grading 2 8 2,480 2 4.77 2,480
Grading 2 8 2,480 2 4.77 2,480
Grading 1 8 1,240 1 4.77 1,240
Building Construction 3 8 37,200 3 47.69 37,200
Building Construction 1 8 12,400 1 47.69 12,400
Building Construction 1 7 10,850 1 41.73 10,850
Building Construction 1 8 12,400 1 47.69 12,400
Building Construction 3 7 32,550 3 41.73 32,550
Paving 2 8 1,760 2 3.38 1,760
Paving 2 8 1,760 2 3.38 1,760
Paving 2 8 1,760 2 3.38 1,760
Architectural Coating 1 6 660 1 2.54 660
* The modified hours per day is based on the scale adjustment factor for the corresponding construction phase.

Construction Scenario 1 Modified On‐Road Vehicle Activity for CalEEMod Phase Name Trip Type
Default Trips
per Day
Default Total
Trips
Modified Trips
per day*
Modified Total
Trips
Demolition Worker 15.00 1,500 5.77 1,500
Site Preparation Worker 17.50 1,050 4.04 1,050
Grading Worker 20.00 3,100 11.92 3,100
Building Construction Worker 1,267.02 1,963,881 7,553.39 1,963,881 Building Construction Vendor 511.70 793,129 3,050.50 793,129 Paving Worker 15.00 1,650 6.35 1,650
Architectural Coating Worker 253.40 27,874 107.21 27,874 * The modified trips per day is based on the scale adjustment factor for the corresponding construction phase.

Excavators
Default CalEEMod Schedule Modified CalEEMod Schedule Scale Adjustment
Factor
Equipment Type
Rubber Tired Dozers
Excavators
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Graders
Air Compressors
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Scrapers
Rubber Tired Dozers
Forklifts
Generator Sets
Cranes
Welders
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Pavers
Paving Equipment
Rollers

Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 1 / 32
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 2 / 32

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 3 / 32

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 4 / 32

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 5 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction)
Construction Start Date 1/1/2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.70
Precipitation (days) 25.4
Location 36.70464792900411, -119.7812713373362
County Fresno
City Fresno
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2482
EDFZ 5
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.25

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing

23.0 Dwelling Unit 7.47 44,850 269,396 — 74.0 —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 6 / 32
Supermarket 217 1000sqft 4.98 217,000 0.00 — — —
Office Park 145 1000sqft 3.33 145,000 0.00 — — —
Industrial Park 1,082 1000sqft 24.8 1,082,000 0.00 — — — General Heavy
Industry
1,563 1000sqft 35.9 1,563,000 0.00 — — —
General Office
Building
100 1000sqft 2.30 100,000 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 112 106 208 462 0.54 5.52 65.2 70.7 5.14 18.0 23.1 — 120,417 120,417 4.94 9.73 320 123,761 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 107 101 218 404 0.54 5.52 65.2 70.7 5.14 18.0 23.1 — 115,121 115,121 4.07 9.74 8.31 118,133 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 76.7 72.5 151 290 0.39 3.93 45.8 49.8 3.66 12.6 16.3 — 83,051 83,051 3.64 6.93 98.5 85,307 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.0 13.2 27.6 52.9 0.07 0.72 8.37 9.08 0.67 2.31 2.97 — 13,750 13,750 0.60 1.15 16.3 14,124 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 7 / 32

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 112 106 208 462 0.54 5.52 65.2 70.7 5.14 18.0 23.1 — 120,417 120,417 4.94 9.73 320 123,761 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 107 101 218 404 0.54 5.52 65.2 70.7 5.14 18.0 23.1 — 115,121 115,121 4.07 9.74 8.31 118,133 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 76.7 72.5 151 290 0.39 3.93 45.8 49.8 3.66 12.6 16.3 — 83,051 83,051 3.64 6.93 98.5 85,307 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 14.0 13.2 27.6 52.9 0.07 0.72 8.37 9.08 0.67 2.31 2.97 — 13,750 13,750 0.60 1.15 16.3 14,124

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 1.01 9.58 8.37 0.01 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 1,319 1,319 0.05 0.01 — 1,323 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.32 0.32 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 8 / 32
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.20 1.01 9.58 8.37 0.01 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 1,319 1,319 0.05 0.01 — 1,323 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.32 0.32 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.85 0.72 6.83 5.96 0.01 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 939 939 0.04 0.01 — 943 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.23 0.23 — 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.25 1.09 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 — 156 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.04 0.04 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 35.7 35.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 36.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.32 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 264 264 0.01 0.04 0.64 277 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 9 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 31.7 31.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 264 264 0.01 0.04 0.02 277 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.24 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 188 188 < 0.005 0.03 0.19 197 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.87 3.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.94 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.2 31.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 32.7

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.00 0.84 8.31 7.61 0.01 0.37 — 0.37 0.34 — 0.34 — 1,225 1,225 0.05 0.01 — 1,229 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 4.61 4.61 — 2.35 2.35 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 10 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.00 0.84 8.31 7.61 0.01 0.37 — 0.37 0.34 — 0.34 — 1,225 1,225 0.05 0.01 — 1,229 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 4.61 4.61 — 2.35 2.35 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.71 0.60 5.92 5.42 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 872 872 0.04 0.01 — 875 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 3.29 3.29 — 1.67 1.67 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 1.08 0.99 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 144 144 0.01 < 0.005 — 145 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.60 0.60 — 0.31 0.31 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.0 25.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 25.5 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 11 / 32
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.47 0.24 12.3 2.94 0.07 0.19 2.65 2.84 0.19 0.73 0.91 — 10,196 10,196 0.22 1.62 24.5 10,708 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.2 22.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.46 0.23 13.2 3.00 0.07 0.19 2.65 2.84 0.19 0.73 0.91 — 10,202 10,202 0.22 1.62 0.64 10,691 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.4 16.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.33 0.17 9.20 2.11 0.05 0.13 1.86 2.00 0.13 0.51 0.65 — 7,265 7,265 0.16 1.15 7.51 7,619 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.71 2.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.68 0.39 0.01 0.02 0.34 0.36 0.02 0.09 0.12 — 1,203 1,203 0.03 0.19 1.24 1,261

3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.50 2.10 20.4 18.0 0.04 0.86 — 0.86 0.79 — 0.79 — 3,934 3,934 0.16 0.03 — 3,948 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 12 / 32
———————2.182.18—5.495.49——————Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.50 2.10 20.4 18.0 0.04 0.86 — 0.86 0.79 — 0.79 — 3,934 3,934 0.16 0.03 — 3,948 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 5.49 5.49 — 2.18 2.18 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.78 1.49 14.6 12.8 0.03 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 2,802 2,802 0.11 0.02 — 2,812 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 3.91 3.91 — 1.55 1.55 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 2.66 2.34 < 0.005 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 464 464 0.02 < 0.005 — 466 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.71 0.71 — 0.28 0.28 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 13 / 32
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 73.8 73.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 75.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 65.5 65.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 49.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.00 8.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.14 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 14 / 32
Off-Road
Equipment

8.57 7.17 66.9 78.2 0.14 2.97 — 2.97 2.73 — 2.73 — 14,293 14,293 0.58 0.12 — 14,342 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

8.57 7.17 66.9 78.2 0.14 2.97 — 2.97 2.73 — 2.73 — 14,293 14,293 0.58 0.12 — 14,342 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

6.10 5.11 47.6 55.7 0.10 2.11 — 2.11 1.94 — 1.94 — 10,181 10,181 0.41 0.08 — 10,216 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.11 0.93 8.70 10.2 0.02 0.39 — 0.39 0.35 — 0.35 — 1,686 1,686 0.07 0.01 — 1,691 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 36.5 34.5 18.8 307 0.00 0.00 41.1 41.1 0.00 9.63 9.63 — 46,791 46,791 2.78 1.95 187 47,629 Vendor 3.56 2.15 66.8 30.0 0.27 0.54 10.2 10.8 0.54 2.83 3.37 — 40,862 40,862 1.01 5.92 105 42,755 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 32.3 30.0 23.8 248 0.00 0.00 41.1 41.1 0.00 9.63 9.63 — 41,511 41,511 2.00 1.95 4.86 42,147 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 15 / 32
Vendor 3.36 1.95 71.2 31.1 0.27 0.54 10.2 10.8 0.54 2.83 3.37 — 40,934 40,934 0.94 5.92 2.71 42,724 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 23.4 21.9 14.7 179 0.00 0.00 28.8 28.8 0.00 6.74 6.74 — 30,631 30,631 2.10 1.39 57.7 31,155 Vendor 2.44 1.44 49.4 21.6 0.19 0.38 7.19 7.57 0.38 1.99 2.37 — 29,128 29,128 0.72 4.22 32.1 30,435 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.27 3.99 2.68 32.7 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 5,071 5,071 0.35 0.23 9.56 5,158 Vendor 0.45 0.26 9.01 3.94 0.03 0.07 1.31 1.38 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,823 4,823 0.12 0.70 5.31 5,039 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.36 3.30 4.24 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 639 639 0.03 0.01 — 641 Paving 0.18 0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.36 3.30 4.24 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 639 639 0.03 0.01 — 641 Paving 0.18 0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 16 / 32
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.26 2.35 3.02 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 455 455 0.02 < 0.005 — 456 Paving 0.13 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.43 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 75.3 75.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 75.6 Paving 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 39.3 39.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 40.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 34.9 34.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 35.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 26.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 17 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.26 4.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.38 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 56.5 56.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 56.7 Architect
ural
Coatings

56.5 56.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.38 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 56.5 56.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 56.7 Architect
ural
Coatings

56.5 56.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 18 / 32
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.27 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 40.3 40.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.4 Architect
ural
Coatings

40.2 40.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.67 6.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.69 Architect
ural
Coatings

7.34 7.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.52 0.49 0.27 4.35 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 664 664 0.04 0.03 2.65 676 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.43 0.34 3.52 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 589 589 0.03 0.03 0.07 598 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.31 0.21 2.55 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 435 435 0.03 0.02 0.82 442 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 19 / 32
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 72.0 72.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 73.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 20 / 32
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 21 / 32
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 1/1/2024 12/27/2024 5.00 260 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2024 12/27/2024 5.00 260 — Grading Grading 1/1/2024 12/27/2024 5.00 260 —
Building Construction Building Construction 1/1/2024 12/27/2024 5.00 260 — Paving Paving 1/1/2024 12/27/2024 5.00 260 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/1/2024 12/27/2024 5.00 260 — Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 22 / 32

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 3.08 367 0.40 Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 3.08 36.0 0.38 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel A verage 1.00 3.08 33.0 0.73
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 1.85 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 4.00 1.85 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 4.77 148 0.41
Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 4.77 36.0 0.38
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 4.77 84.0 0.37
Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 4.77 423 0.48
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 4.77 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 47.7 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 47.7 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 41.7 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 47.7 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 3.00 41.7 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 3.38 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 3.38 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 3.38 36.0 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 2.54 37.0 0.48 Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 23 / 32

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 5.77 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 3.70 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 4.04 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 143 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 11.9 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 7,553 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 3,051 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 6.35 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 24 / 32
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 107 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 4.00 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 90,821 30,274 4,660,500 1,553,500 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Y ards) Material Exported (Cubic Y ards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building Square F
ootage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 83,709 —
Site Preparation — 297,384 90.2 0.00 —
Grading — — 465 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.1
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 25 / 32

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Single Family Housing 0.25 0%
Supermarket 1.25 100%
Office Park 0.83 100%
Industrial Park 6.21 100%
General Heavy Industry 8.97 100%
General Office Building 0.57 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 26 / 32
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will
continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 24.3 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 2.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day
or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation
location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.

Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation,
population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 27 / 32
Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding 0 0 0 N/A
Drought 0 0 0 N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 2 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding 1 1 1 2
Drought 1 1 1 2
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 28 / 32

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 82.5
AQ-PM 97.7
AQ-DPM 98.7
Drinking Water 84.4
Lead Risk Housing 96.5
Pesticides 42.9
Toxic Releases 92.2
Traffic 60.4
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 98.2
Groundwater 91.2
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 96.3
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 80.0
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 97.2
Cardio-vascular 92.2
Low Birth Weights 95.6
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 29 / 32
Education 93.2
Housing 91.0
Linguistic 79.4
Poverty 98.9
Unemployment 93.8

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 2.75888618
Employed 4.709354549
Median HI 5.273963814
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 9.547029385
High school enrollment 6.108045682
Preschool enrollment 17.00243809
Transportation —
Auto Access 5.915565251
Active commuting 28.28179135
Social —
2-parent households 31.82343128
Voting 0.936738098
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 36.78942641
Park access 21.85294495
Retail density 40.81868343
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 30 / 32
Supermarket access 11.86962659
Tree canopy 46.63159245
Housing —
Homeownership 31.38714231
Housing habitability 12.42140382
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 21.429488
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 32.77300141
Uncrowded housing 14.69267291
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 10.18863082
Arthritis 14.6
Asthma ER Admissions 2.3
High Blood Pressure 5.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 77.2
Asthma 1.3
Coronary Heart Disease 5.2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2.6
Diagnosed Diabetes 1.8
Life Expectancy at Birth 11.9
Cognitively Disabled 7.6
Physically Disabled 8.5
Heart Attack ER Admissions 3.7
Mental Health Not Good 2.2
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.7
Obesity 1.5
Pedestrian Injuries 97.2
Physical Health Not Good 2.0
Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 31 / 32
Stroke 1.8
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 84.3
Current Smoker 4.4
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 1.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 7.3
Elderly 70.0
English Speaking 21.6
Foreign-born 58.6
Outdoor Workers 2.7
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 50.0
Traffic Density 62.8
Traffic Access 0.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 96.8
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 1.2

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 100
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 0.00 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Y es Fresno SCSP 2024 (25% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/2/2024 32 / 32
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) Central Fresno a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Construction Phases Modified to evenly distrubute all the construction phases throughout one calendar year (260 work days).

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Scaled the default hours/day for each phase based on the corresponding adjustment factor to normaliz
e the default schedule for each phase over a year (260 work days).

Construction: Trips and VMT Scaled default worker and vendor trips for each phase based on the corresponding adjustment factor to nor
malize the default schedule for each phase over a year (260 work days).

Construction: Paving Consistent with DEIR, resiential paved areas assumed to equal default and other land uses are 25% of total
lot acreage.

Construction Scenario 2 Scale Adjustment Factors for CalEEMod Phase Name
Days Per
Week Start Date End  Date
Work Days
per Phase Start Date End  Date
Work Days
per Phase
Demolition 5 1/1/2024 7/14/2025 400 1/1/2024 12/31/2039 4175 0.10 Site Preparation 5 7/15/2025 6/16/2026 240 5/21/2024 12/31/2039 4175 0.06 Grading 5 6/17/2026 11/1/2028 620 8/14/2024 12/31/2039 4175 0.15 Building Construction 5 11/2/2028 8/8/2052 6,200 3/20/2025 12/31/2039 4175 1.49 Paving 5 8/9/2052 4/17/2054 440 2/28/2031 12/31/2039 4175 0.11 Architectural Coating 5 4/18/2054 12/25/2055 440 8/2/2031 12/31/2039 4175 0.11 Construction Scenario 2 Modified Off‐Road Equipment Activity for CalEEMod Phase Name
Default
Number
per Day
Default
Hours
Per Day
Default
Total Hours of
Use
Modified
Number
per Day
Modified
Hours
per Day*
Modified
Total Hours of
Use
Demolition 2 8 6,400 2 0.77 6,400
Demolition 3 8 9,600 3 0.77 9,600
Demolition 1 8 3,200 1 0.77 3,200
Site Preparation 3 8 5,760 3 0.46 5,760
Site Preparation 4 8 7,680 4 0.46 7,680
Grading 1 8 4,960 1 1.19 4,960
Grading 2 8 9,920 2 1.19 9,920
Grading 2 8 9,920 2 1.19 9,920
Grading 2 8 9,920 2 1.19 9,920
Grading 1 8 4,960 1 1.19 4,960
Building Construction 3 8 148,800 3 11.88 148,800
Building Construction 1 8 49,600 1 11.88 49,600
Building Construction 1 7 43,400 1 10.40 43,400
Building Construction 1 8 49,600 1 11.88 49,600
Building Construction 3 7 130,200 3 10.40 130,200
Paving 2 8 7,040 2 0.84 7,040
Paving 2 8 7,040 2 0.84 7,040
Paving 2 8 7,040 2 0.84 7,040
Architectural Coating 1 6 2,640 1 0.63 2,640
* The modified hours per day is based on the scale adjustment factor for the corresponding construction phase.

Construction Scenario 2 Modified On‐Road Vehicle Activity for CalEEMod Phase Name Trip Type
Default Trips
per Day
Default Total
Trips
Modified Trips
per day*
Modified Total
Trips
Demolition Worker 15.00 6,000 1.44 6,000
Site Preparation Worker 17.50 4,200 1.01 4,200
Grading Worker 20.00 12,400 2.97 12,400
Building Construction Worker 5,056.76 31,351,912 7,509.44 31,351,912 Building Construction Vendor 2,030.61 12,589,812 3,015.52 12,589,812 Paving Worker 15.00 6,600 1.58 6,600
Architectural Coating Worker 1,011.35 444,995 106.59 444,995 * The modified trips per day is based on the scale adjustment factor for the corresponding construction phase.

Excavators
Default CalEEMod Schedule Modified CalEEMod Schedule Scale Adjustment
Factor
Equipment Type
Rubber Tired Dozers
Excavators
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Graders
Air Compressors
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Scrapers
Rubber Tired Dozers
Forklifts
Generator Sets
Cranes
Welders
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Pavers
Paving Equipment
Rollers

Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 1 / 215
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated

3.5. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated

3.7. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated

3.9. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated

3.11. Demolition (2029) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 2 / 215

3.13. Demolition (2030) - Unmitigated

3.15. Demolition (2031) - Unmitigated

3.17. Demolition (2032) - Unmitigated

3.19. Demolition (2033) - Unmitigated

3.21. Demolition (2034) - Unmitigated

3.23. Demolition (2035) - Unmitigated

3.25. Demolition (2036) - Unmitigated

3.27. Demolition (2037) - Unmitigated

3.29. Demolition (2038) - Unmitigated

3.31. Demolition (2039) - Unmitigated

3.33. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.35. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.37. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.39. Site Preparation (2027) - Unmitigated

3.41. Site Preparation (2028) - Unmitigated

3.43. Site Preparation (2029) - Unmitigated

3.45. Site Preparation (2030) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 3 / 215

3.47. Site Preparation (2031) - Unmitigated

3.49. Site Preparation (2032) - Unmitigated

3.51. Site Preparation (2033) - Unmitigated

3.53. Site Preparation (2034) - Unmitigated

3.55. Site Preparation (2035) - Unmitigated

3.57. Site Preparation (2036) - Unmitigated

3.59. Site Preparation (2037) - Unmitigated

3.61. Site Preparation (2038) - Unmitigated

3.63. Site Preparation (2039) - Unmitigated

3.65. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.67. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.69. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated

3.71. Grading (2027) - Unmitigated

3.73. Grading (2028) - Unmitigated

3.75. Grading (2029) - Unmitigated

3.77. Grading (2030) - Unmitigated

3.79. Grading (2031) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 4 / 215

3.81. Grading (2032) - Unmitigated

3.83. Grading (2033) - Unmitigated

3.85. Grading (2034) - Unmitigated

3.87. Grading (2035) - Unmitigated

3.89. Grading (2036) - Unmitigated

3.91. Grading (2037) - Unmitigated

3.93. Grading (2038) - Unmitigated

3.95. Grading (2039) - Unmitigated

3.97. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.99. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.101. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.103. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.105. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.107. Building Construction (2029) - Unmitigated

3.109. Building Construction (2030) - Unmitigated

3.111. Building Construction (2031) - Unmitigated

3.113. Building Construction (2032) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 5 / 215

3.115. Building Construction (2033) - Unmitigated

3.117. Building Construction (2034) - Unmitigated

3.119. Building Construction (2035) - Unmitigated

3.121. Building Construction (2036) - Unmitigated

3.123. Building Construction (2037) - Unmitigated

3.125. Building Construction (2038) - Unmitigated

3.127. Building Construction (2039) - Unmitigated

3.129. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.131. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.133. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.135. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.137. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.139. Paving (2029) - Unmitigated

3.141. Paving (2030) - Unmitigated

3.143. Paving (2031) - Unmitigated

3.145. Paving (2032) - Unmitigated

3.147. Paving (2033) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 6 / 215

3.149. Paving (2034) - Unmitigated

3.151. Paving (2035) - Unmitigated

3.153. Paving (2036) - Unmitigated

3.155. Paving (2037) - Unmitigated

3.157. Paving (2038) - Unmitigated

3.159. Paving (2039) - Unmitigated

3.161. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.163. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.165. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

3.167. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

3.169. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated

3.171. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated

3.173. Architectural Coating (2030) - Unmitigated

3.175. Architectural Coating (2031) - Unmitigated

3.177. Architectural Coating (2032) - Unmitigated

3.179. Architectural Coating (2033) - Unmitigated

3.181. Architectural Coating (2034) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 7 / 215

3.183. Architectural Coating (2035) - Unmitigated

3.185. Architectural Coating (2036) - Unmitigated

3.187. Architectural Coating (2037) - Unmitigated

3.189. Architectural Coating (2038) - Unmitigated

3.191. Architectural Coating (2039) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 8 / 215

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 9 / 215

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 10 / 215

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction)
Construction Start Date 1/1/2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.70
Precipitation (days) 25.4
Location 36.70464792900411, -119.7812713373362
County Fresno
City Fresno
Air District San Joaquin Valley APCD
Air Basin San Joaquin Valley
TAZ 2482
EDFZ 5
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.25

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
Single Family
Housing

91.0 Dwelling Unit 29.5 177,450 1,065,870 — 291 —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 11 / 215
Supermarket 867 1000sqft 19.9 867,000 0.00 — — —
Office Park 579 1000sqft 13.3 579,000 0.00 — — —
Industrial Park 4,327 1000sqft 99.3 4,327,000 0.00 — — — General Heavy
Industry
6,250 1000sqft 143 6,250,000 0.00 — — —
General Office
Building
100 1000sqft 2.30 100,000 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 57.7 53.7 115 369 0.33 1.77 54.9 56.6 1.68 13.8 15.5 — 95,570 95,570 4.08 8.27 298 98,435 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 53.3 49.0 125 311 0.33 1.77 54.9 56.6 1.68 13.8 15.5 — 90,314 90,314 3.22 8.27 7.75 92,868 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 38.6 35.6 85.8 225 0.24 1.27 38.7 40.0 1.20 9.77 11.0 — 65,733 65,733 3.04 5.93 92.4 67,667 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 7.04 6.50 15.7 41.1 0.04 0.23 7.06 7.30 0.22 1.78 2.00 — 10,883 10,883 0.50 0.98 15.3 11,203 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 12 / 215

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 57.7 53.7 115 369 0.33 1.77 54.9 56.6 1.68 13.8 15.5 — 95,570 95,570 4.08 8.27 298 98,435 2025 55.0 51.3 109 341 0.33 1.61 54.9 56.5 1.53 13.8 15.4 — 93,788 93,788 2.62 8.26 282 96,596 2026 52.4 48.8 104 317 0.33 1.50 54.9 56.4 1.42 13.8 15.3 — 92,024 92,024 2.55 8.26 254 94,802 2027 49.3 47.0 98.8 297 0.33 1.41 54.9 56.3 1.35 13.8 15.2 — 90,193 90,193 2.36 7.81 227 92,805 2028 47.5 44.3 94.4 279 0.33 1.34 54.9 56.2 1.28 13.8 15.1 — 88,344 88,344 2.36 7.81 203 90,932 2029 45.7 42.3 89.8 264 0.33 1.29 54.9 56.1 1.23 13.8 15.1 — 86,487 86,487 2.20 7.52 180 88,964 2030 44.3 40.9 87.3 248 0.33 1.25 54.9 56.1 1.20 13.8 15.0 — 84,628 84,628 1.93 6.16 160 86,672 2031 41.4 39.4 83.6 236 0.33 1.22 54.9 56.1 0.90 13.8 14.7 — 82,807 82,807 1.76 5.88 141 84,745 2032 39.7 37.9 81.0 224 0.33 1.16 54.9 56.0 0.84 13.8 14.7 — 81,070 81,070 1.76 5.87 122 82,984 2033 38.5 37.0 77.5 214 0.33 0.85 54.9 55.7 0.79 13.8 14.6 — 79,469 79,469 1.76 5.60 106 81,287 2034 37.3 35.8 75.7 206 0.33 0.82 54.9 55.7 0.76 13.8 14.6 — 77,985 77,985 1.74 5.60 91.0 79,788 2035 36.7 35.4 73.8 198 0.33 0.78 54.9 55.6 0.73 13.8 14.6 — 76,620 76,620 1.58 5.32 77.6 78,321 2036 36.1 34.7 72.3 191 0.33 0.73 54.9 55.6 0.70 13.8 14.5 — 75,394 75,394 1.58 5.32 65.5 77,083 2037 35.1 33.6 69.7 185 0.33 0.71 54.9 55.6 0.68 13.8 14.5 — 74,306 74,306 1.58 5.32 55.0 75,985 2038 34.2 31.5 68.4 181 0.33 0.69 54.9 55.5 0.66 13.8 14.5 — 73,325 73,325 1.58 5.03 45.8 74,911 2039 33.5 30.8 67.1 177 0.33 0.67 54.9 55.5 0.64 13.8 14.5 — 72,473 72,473 1.51 5.03 38.0 74,049 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 53.3 49.0 125 311 0.33 1.77 54.9 56.6 1.68 13.8 15.5 — 90,314 90,314 3.22 8.27 7.75 92,868 2025 51.0 47.0 117 289 0.33 1.61 54.9 56.5 1.53 13.8 15.4 — 88,663 88,663 3.05 8.26 7.32 91,207 2026 47.7 45.2 112 269 0.33 1.50 54.9 56.4 1.42 13.8 15.3 — 87,024 87,024 2.88 8.26 6.58 89,563 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 13 / 215
2027 45.9 42.3 106 252 0.33 1.41 54.9 56.3 1.35 13.8 15.2 — 85,311 85,311 2.87 7.97 5.89 87,766 2028 44.3 41.1 102 237 0.33 1.34 54.9 56.2 1.28 13.8 15.1 — 83,566 83,566 2.70 7.97 5.27 86,015 2029 42.9 39.3 97.0 225 0.33 1.29 54.9 56.1 1.23 13.8 15.1 — 81,809 81,809 2.70 7.69 4.68 84,173 2030 40.2 37.9 93.0 213 0.33 1.25 54.9 56.1 1.20 13.8 15.0 — 80,043 80,043 2.27 7.52 4.14 82,346 2031 39.0 36.9 89.1 201 0.33 1.22 54.9 56.1 0.90 13.8 14.7 — 78,305 78,305 2.10 7.24 3.65 80,519 2032 37.7 35.7 86.6 191 0.33 1.16 54.9 56.0 0.84 13.8 14.7 — 76,645 76,645 2.10 5.87 3.17 78,448 2033 36.5 34.9 83.1 183 0.33 0.85 54.9 55.7 0.79 13.8 14.6 — 75,111 75,111 2.10 5.60 2.75 76,834 2034 35.6 33.9 81.3 175 0.33 0.82 54.9 55.7 0.76 13.8 14.6 — 73,686 73,686 1.91 5.60 2.36 75,404 2035 35.0 33.3 79.4 169 0.33 0.78 54.9 55.6 0.73 13.8 14.6 — 72,375 72,375 1.91 5.32 2.01 74,009 2036 34.6 33.1 76.1 163 0.33 0.73 54.9 55.6 0.70 13.8 14.5 — 71,195 71,195 1.91 5.32 1.70 72,829 2037 33.9 31.1 74.8 158 0.33 0.71 54.9 55.6 0.68 13.8 14.5 — 70,149 70,149 1.68 5.32 1.43 71,777 2038 33.3 30.6 73.5 153 0.33 0.69 54.9 55.5 0.66 13.8 14.5 — 69,206 69,206 1.68 5.03 1.19 70,749 2039 32.6 29.9 72.3 150 0.33 0.67 54.9 55.5 0.64 13.8 14.5 — 68,385 68,385 1.68 5.03 0.98 69,929 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 38.6 35.6 85.8 225 0.24 1.27 38.7 40.0 1.20 9.77 11.0 — 65,733 65,733 3.04 5.93 92.4 67,667 2025 36.6 34.0 80.8 208 0.24 1.15 38.6 39.8 1.09 9.74 10.8 — 64,349 64,349 2.06 5.90 87.1 66,245 2026 35.3 32.7 76.9 194 0.24 1.07 38.6 39.7 1.02 9.74 10.8 — 63,153 63,153 1.94 5.90 78.2 65,037 2027 33.1 31.5 73.6 182 0.24 1.01 38.6 39.6 0.96 9.74 10.7 — 61,906 61,906 1.81 5.70 70.0 63,719 2028 32.1 29.7 70.4 172 0.24 0.96 38.7 39.7 0.92 9.77 10.7 — 60,805 60,805 1.81 5.59 62.8 62,579 2029 30.8 28.3 66.9 162 0.24 0.92 38.6 39.5 0.88 9.74 10.6 — 59,364 59,364 1.69 5.37 55.6 61,064 2030 29.9 27.5 64.2 153 0.24 0.89 38.6 39.5 0.86 9.74 10.6 — 58,085 58,085 1.50 5.33 49.3 59,759 2031 28.0 26.6 62.2 145 0.24 0.87 38.6 39.5 0.64 9.74 10.4 — 56,827 56,827 1.38 4.20 43.2 58,157 2032 27.2 25.8 59.6 139 0.24 0.83 38.7 39.5 0.60 9.77 10.4 — 55,778 55,778 1.38 4.20 37.9 57,103 2033 26.3 25.2 57.8 132 0.24 0.61 38.6 39.2 0.57 9.74 10.3 — 54,516 54,516 1.38 4.00 32.8 55,775 2034 25.5 24.4 56.5 127 0.24 0.59 38.6 39.2 0.54 9.74 10.3 — 53,488 53,488 1.25 4.00 28.1 54,739 2035 25.2 24.0 54.4 122 0.24 0.56 38.6 39.2 0.52 9.74 10.3 — 52,540 52,540 1.25 3.80 23.9 53,727 2036 25.0 23.9 53.3 118 0.24 0.52 38.7 39.2 0.50 9.77 10.3 — 51,830 51,830 1.25 3.81 20.3 53,016 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 14 / 215
2037 24.1 22.3 52.0 114 0.24 0.51 38.6 39.1 0.48 9.74 10.2 — 50,933 50,933 1.25 3.80 16.9 52,113 2038 23.9 21.9 51.1 111 0.24 0.49 38.6 39.1 0.47 9.74 10.2 — 50,251 50,251 1.08 3.60 14.1 51,364 2039 23.2 21.2 49.3 109 0.24 0.48 38.5 39.0 0.46 9.71 10.2 — 49,523 49,523 1.08 3.59 11.7 50,630 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 7.04 6.50 15.7 41.1 0.04 0.23 7.06 7.30 0.22 1.78 2.00 — 10,883 10,883 0.50 0.98 15.3 11,203 2025 6.69 6.21 14.7 38.0 0.04 0.21 7.04 7.25 0.20 1.78 1.98 — 10,654 10,654 0.34 0.98 14.4 10,968 2026 6.44 5.97 14.0 35.4 0.04 0.20 7.04 7.24 0.19 1.78 1.96 — 10,456 10,456 0.32 0.98 12.9 10,768 2027 6.04 5.74 13.4 33.2 0.04 0.18 7.04 7.23 0.18 1.78 1.95 — 10,249 10,249 0.30 0.94 11.6 10,549 2028 5.85 5.42 12.8 31.4 0.04 0.18 7.06 7.24 0.17 1.78 1.95 — 10,067 10,067 0.30 0.93 10.4 10,361 2029 5.63 5.16 12.2 29.5 0.04 0.17 7.04 7.21 0.16 1.78 1.94 — 9,828 9,828 0.28 0.89 9.21 10,110 2030 5.46 5.02 11.7 27.9 0.04 0.16 7.04 7.21 0.16 1.78 1.93 — 9,617 9,617 0.25 0.88 8.16 9,894 2031 5.12 4.85 11.4 26.5 0.04 0.16 7.04 7.20 0.12 1.78 1.90 — 9,408 9,408 0.23 0.70 7.16 9,628 2032 4.96 4.70 10.9 25.3 0.04 0.15 7.06 7.22 0.11 1.78 1.89 — 9,235 9,235 0.23 0.70 6.27 9,454 2033 4.79 4.60 10.5 24.1 0.04 0.11 7.04 7.16 0.10 1.78 1.88 — 9,026 9,026 0.23 0.66 5.43 9,234 2034 4.65 4.46 10.3 23.2 0.04 0.11 7.04 7.15 0.10 1.78 1.88 — 8,856 8,856 0.21 0.66 4.65 9,063 2035 4.60 4.39 9.92 22.3 0.04 0.10 7.04 7.15 0.09 1.78 1.87 — 8,699 8,699 0.21 0.63 3.96 8,895 2036 4.56 4.37 9.73 21.5 0.04 0.10 7.06 7.16 0.09 1.78 1.87 — 8,581 8,581 0.21 0.63 3.37 8,777 2037 4.40 4.07 9.50 20.8 0.04 0.09 7.04 7.14 0.09 1.78 1.87 — 8,433 8,433 0.21 0.63 2.81 8,628 2038 4.36 4.00 9.33 20.2 0.04 0.09 7.04 7.13 0.09 1.78 1.86 — 8,320 8,320 0.18 0.60 2.34 8,504 2039 4.23 3.87 9.01 19.8 0.04 0.09 7.03 7.11 0.08 1.77 1.86 — 8,199 8,199 0.18 0.59 1.93 8,382

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 15 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 2.40 2.09 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 2.40 2.09 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.72 1.50 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 237 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.31 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.1 39.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 16 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.92 8.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 9.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 65.8 65.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 69.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.91 7.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 65.8 65.8 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 69.0 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.87 5.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.97 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 47.1 47.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 49.4 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.97 0.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.80 7.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.18

3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 17 / 215
331—< 0.0050.01330330—0.08—0.080.09—0.09< 0.0051.922.140.230.28Off-Road Equipment
Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.23 2.14 1.92 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.16 1.53 1.37 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 235 235 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.28 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 18 / 215
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.73 8.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 8.88 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 64.5 64.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 67.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.75 7.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.87 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 64.5 64.5 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 67.6 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.73 5.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.83 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 46.1 46.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 48.3 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.95 0.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.63 7.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.00

3.5. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 1.99 1.83 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 19 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 1.99 1.83 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.42 1.31 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.26 0.24 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.55 8.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 8.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 66.3 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 20 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.59 7.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.71 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 66.2 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.61 5.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.71 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.1 45.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 47.3 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.93 0.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.95 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.84

3.7. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.92 1.79 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 21 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.92 1.79 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.37 1.28 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.25 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.37 8.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 8.50 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 61.7 61.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 64.7 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 22 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.43 7.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 61.8 61.8 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 64.6 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.50 5.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.1 44.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 46.2 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.91 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.93 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.30 7.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.65

3.9. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.88 1.80 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 23 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.88 1.80 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.35 1.29 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 237 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.25 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.1 39.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.3 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.21 8.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 60.1 60.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 63.1 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 24 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.29 7.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.41 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 60.2 60.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 63.1 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.41 5.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.49 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 45.2 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.90 0.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.91 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.48

3.11. Demolition (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.79 1.78 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 25 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.79 1.78 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.28 1.27 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.23 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.06 8.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 58.6 58.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 61.4 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 26 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.16 7.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.28 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 58.6 58.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 61.4 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.29 5.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.38 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 41.8 41.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 43.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.88 0.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.93 6.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.26

3.13. Demolition (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 0.20 1.74 1.80 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 27 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 0.20 1.74 1.80 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.25 1.28 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.23 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.91 7.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 7.97 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 57.0 57.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 59.9 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 28 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.03 7.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.14 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 57.0 57.0 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 59.8 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.20 5.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.28 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.7 40.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 42.7 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.74 6.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.07

3.15. Demolition (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.20 1.69 1.76 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 29 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.20 1.69 1.76 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.21 1.26 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.22 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.78 7.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 7.83 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 55.5 55.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 58.2 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 30 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.92 6.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 55.5 55.5 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 58.2 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.12 5.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.15 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.7 39.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 41.6 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.85 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.56 6.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.88

3.17. Demolition (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.56 1.62 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 31 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.56 1.62 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.12 1.16 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 237 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.20 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.1 39.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.66 7.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.71 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 54.1 54.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 56.7 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 32 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.81 6.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.84 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 54.1 54.1 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 56.6 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.05 5.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 38.7 38.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 40.6 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.84 0.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.84 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.42 6.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.72

3.19. Demolition (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.49 1.53 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 33 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.49 1.53 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.07 1.10 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.19 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.55 7.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.60 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 52.8 52.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 55.4 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 34 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.72 6.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.75 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 52.9 52.9 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 55.4 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.97 4.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 39.6 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.82 0.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.83 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.25 6.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.55

3.21. Demolition (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.45 1.51 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 35 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.45 1.51 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.04 1.08 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.19 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.46 7.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.50 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 51.7 51.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 54.3 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 36 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.63 6.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.66 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 51.8 51.8 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 54.3 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.90 4.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.93 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.0 37.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 38.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.81 0.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.82 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.12 6.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.42

3.23. Demolition (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.37 1.44 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 37 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.37 1.44 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 0.98 1.03 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.18 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.37 7.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.41 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 50.8 50.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 53.2 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 38 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.55 6.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 50.8 50.8 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 53.2 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.85 4.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.87 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.3 36.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 38.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.80 0.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.81 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.29

3.25. Demolition (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.29 1.36 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 39 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.29 1.36 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 0.92 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 237 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.17 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.1 39.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.29 7.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 52.4 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 40 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.48 6.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.52 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 50.0 50.0 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 52.4 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.81 4.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.83 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.8 35.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 37.5 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.80 0.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.92 5.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.21

3.27. Demolition (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.29 1.38 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 41 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.29 1.38 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 0.92 0.98 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.17 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.22 7.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.26 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.2 49.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 51.7 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 42 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.42 6.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.45 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.3 49.3 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 51.7 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.75 4.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.78 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.2 35.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 36.9 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.79 0.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.79 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.82 5.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.11

3.29. Demolition (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.19 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 43 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.19 1.27 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.85 0.91 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 236 236 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.16 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.16 7.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.20 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 48.6 48.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 50.9 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 44 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.37 6.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.40 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 48.7 48.7 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 50.9 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.71 4.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.73 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 34.7 34.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 36.4 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.78 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.75 5.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.02

3.31. Demolition (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.16 1.25 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 45 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.16 1.25 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 330 330 0.01 < 0.005 — 331 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.83 0.89 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 235 235 0.01 < 0.005 — 236 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 38.9 38.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.0 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.11 7.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.14 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 48.1 48.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 50.4 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 46 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.32 6.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.35 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 48.1 48.1 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 50.4 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.66 4.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 34.3 34.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 35.9 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.77 0.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.68 5.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.94

3.33. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 2.07 1.89 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 47 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 2.07 1.89 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.48 1.36 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 219 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.27 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.1 36.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.2 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.26 6.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 6.37 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 48 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.12 0.06 3.07 0.73 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,538 2,538 0.05 0.40 6.10 2,665 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.55 5.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.11 0.06 3.28 0.75 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,540 2,540 0.05 0.40 0.16 2,661 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.12 4.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.19 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.30 0.53 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,818 1,818 0.04 0.29 1.88 1,907 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.68 0.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.69 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 0.01 0.42 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 301 301 0.01 0.05 0.31 316

3.35. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.82 1.74 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 304 304 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 49 / 215
———————0.580.58—1.151.15——————Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.82 1.74 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 304 304 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.14 1.30 1.24 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 217 217 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.24 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 50 / 215
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.12 6.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.98 0.73 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,489 2,489 0.05 0.39 6.04 2,611 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.43 5.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.52 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 3.18 0.74 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,490 2,490 0.05 0.39 0.16 2,607 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.02 4.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.09 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.03 2.23 0.53 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,778 1,778 0.04 0.28 1.86 1,863 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.41 0.10 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 294 294 0.01 0.05 0.31 309

3.37. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 51 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.68 1.66 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.68 1.66 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.20 1.18 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.22 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 52 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.00 6.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.90 0.71 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,438 2,438 0.05 0.39 5.70 2,560 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.32 5.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.41 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 3.09 0.73 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,439 2,439 0.05 0.39 0.15 2,556 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.94 3.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.03 2.16 0.51 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,742 1,742 0.04 0.28 1.76 1,827 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.66 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.39 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 288 288 0.01 0.05 0.29 302

3.39. Site Preparation (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 53 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.61 1.63 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.61 1.63 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.15 1.16 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 54 / 215
Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.87 5.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 5.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.81 0.70 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,381 2,381 0.04 0.37 5.25 2,498 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.21 5.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.30 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 3.00 0.71 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,383 2,383 0.04 0.37 0.14 2,494 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.86 3.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.03 2.10 0.50 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,701 1,701 0.03 0.27 1.62 1,783 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.64 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.65 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.38 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 282 282 < 0.005 0.04 0.27 295

3.41. Site Preparation (2028) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 55 / 215
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.17 1.58 1.63 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.17 1.58 1.63 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.13 1.17 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 219 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 56 / 215
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.1 36.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.3 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.76 5.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 5.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.73 0.70 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,320 2,320 0.04 0.37 4.82 2,436 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.11 5.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.20 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.92 0.71 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,322 2,322 0.04 0.37 0.12 2,433 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.79 3.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.03 2.04 0.50 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,662 1,662 0.03 0.27 1.49 1,743 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.64 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.37 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 275 275 < 0.005 0.04 0.25 289 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 57 / 215

3.43. Site Preparation (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.49 1.61 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.49 1.61 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.12 1.07 1.15 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 58 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.19 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.65 5.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 5.74 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.66 0.68 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,259 2,259 0.04 0.35 4.40 2,370 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.02 5.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.10 0.04 2.83 0.70 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,261 2,261 0.04 0.35 0.11 2,367 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.03 1.99 0.49 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,614 1,614 0.03 0.25 1.36 1,692 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.61 0.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 59 / 215
Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.36 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 267 267 < 0.005 0.04 0.23 280

3.45. Site Preparation (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.45 1.63 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.45 1.63 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 1.04 1.17 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 60 / 215
———————0.420.42—0.820.82——————Dust
From
Material
Mo
vement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.19 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.55 5.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.59 0.67 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,199 2,199 0.04 0.35 3.99 2,310 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.93 4.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.01 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.77 0.68 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,201 2,201 0.04 0.35 0.10 2,308 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.71 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.94 0.48 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,571 1,571 0.03 0.25 1.23 1,649 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 61 / 215
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.60 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.61 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.35 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 260 260 < 0.005 0.04 0.20 273

3.47. Site Preparation (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.16 1.40 1.60 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.16 1.40 1.60 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 62 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 1.00 1.15 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.18 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.46 5.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.49 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.54 0.67 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,141 2,141 0.04 0.34 3.61 2,247 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.85 4.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.93 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.70 0.68 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.05 0.18 0.23 — 2,143 2,143 0.04 0.34 0.09 2,245 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.59 3.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.61 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 63 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.89 0.48 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,530 1,530 0.03 0.24 1.11 1,604 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.35 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 253 253 < 0.005 0.04 0.18 266

3.49. Site Preparation (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.16 1.28 1.48 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.16 1.28 1.48 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 64 / 215

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.92 1.06 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 219 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.17 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.1 36.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.2 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.37 5.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.41 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.47 0.65 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,087 2,087 0.04 0.32 3.23 2,187 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.78 4.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 65 / 215
Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.65 0.66 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,088 2,088 0.04 0.32 0.08 2,186 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.54 3.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.56 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.85 0.47 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,495 1,495 0.03 0.23 1.00 1,566 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.09 < 0.005 0.01 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 248 248 < 0.005 0.04 0.17 259

3.51. Site Preparation (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.22 1.40 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.22 1.40 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 66 / 215
Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.87 1.00 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.16 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.30 5.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.42 0.64 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,038 2,038 0.04 0.32 2.85 2,138 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 67 / 215
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.71 4.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.73 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.60 0.65 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,040 2,040 0.04 0.32 0.07 2,137 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.48 3.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.50 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.81 0.46 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,456 1,456 0.03 0.23 0.88 1,527 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.58 0.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 241 241 < 0.005 0.04 0.15 253

3.53. Site Preparation (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.18 1.39 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 68 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.18 1.39 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.85 0.99 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.15 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.23 5.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.26 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.38 0.64 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,996 1,996 0.02 0.32 2.49 2,095 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 69 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.65 4.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.67 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.55 0.65 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,997 1,997 0.02 0.32 0.06 2,094 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.46 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.78 0.46 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,426 1,426 0.02 0.23 0.77 1,496 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.57 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.33 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 236 236 < 0.005 0.04 0.13 248

3.55. Site Preparation (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.10 1.32 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 70 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.10 1.32 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.79 0.94 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.14 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.20 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 71 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.35 0.62 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,959 1,959 0.02 0.31 2.15 2,053 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.60 4.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.08 0.04 2.50 0.64 0.02 0.05 0.66 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,960 1,960 0.02 0.31 0.06 2,053 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.40 3.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.03 1.75 0.45 0.01 0.03 0.47 0.50 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,400 1,400 0.02 0.22 0.66 1,466 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.56 0.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.57 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.32 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 232 232 < 0.005 0.04 0.11 243

3.57. Site Preparation (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.04 1.25 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 72 / 215
———————0.580.58—1.151.15——————Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.04 1.25 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.74 0.89 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 219 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.14 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 36.1 36.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.2 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 73 / 215
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.11 5.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.14 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.04 2.32 0.62 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,927 1,927 0.02 0.31 1.85 2,021 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.55 4.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.57 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.04 2.46 0.64 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,928 1,928 0.02 0.31 0.05 2,020 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.37 3.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.39 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.05 0.03 1.73 0.45 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.49 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,381 1,381 0.02 0.22 0.57 1,447 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.56 0.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.56 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.31 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 229 229 < 0.005 0.04 0.09 240

3.59. Site Preparation (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 74 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.04 1.26 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.04 1.26 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.10 0.74 0.90 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.14 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 75 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.07 5.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.09 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.04 2.28 0.61 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,900 1,900 0.02 0.31 1.58 1,993 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.50 4.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.53 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.04 2.43 0.62 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,901 1,901 0.02 0.31 0.04 1,993 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.35 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.05 0.03 1.70 0.44 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.49 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,357 1,357 0.02 0.22 0.49 1,423 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.55 0.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.31 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 225 225 < 0.005 0.04 0.08 236

3.61. Site Preparation (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 76 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.95 1.17 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.95 1.17 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.09 0.68 0.83 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 218 218 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 36.0 36.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.1 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 77 / 215
Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.02 5.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.05 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.04 2.25 0.61 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,876 1,876 0.02 0.29 1.36 1,965 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.46 4.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.49 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.04 2.41 0.62 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,878 1,878 0.02 0.29 0.04 1,965 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.30 3.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.32 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.05 0.03 1.68 0.44 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.49 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,341 1,341 0.02 0.21 0.42 1,403 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.55 0.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.31 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 222 222 < 0.005 0.03 0.07 232

3.63. Site Preparation (2039) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 78 / 215
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.92 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.92 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.15 1.15 — 0.58 0.58 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.09 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 217 217 0.01 < 0.005 — 218 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.82 0.82 — 0.42 0.42 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 79 / 215
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 35.9 35.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.0 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.15 0.15 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.98 4.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.01 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.04 2.23 0.60 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,856 1,856 0.02 0.29 1.16 1,945 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.43 4.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.45 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 0.04 2.38 0.61 0.02 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 1,858 1,858 0.02 0.29 0.03 1,945 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.27 3.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.29 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.05 0.03 1.65 0.43 0.01 0.02 0.46 0.49 0.02 0.13 0.15 — 1,323 1,323 0.02 0.21 0.36 1,385 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.54 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.54 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.01 0.30 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 219 219 < 0.005 0.03 0.06 229 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 80 / 215

3.65. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.52 5.10 4.49 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.52 5.10 4.49 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.45 0.37 3.65 3.21 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 703 703 0.03 0.01 — 705 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 81 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.67 0.59 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 117 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.4 18.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 18.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.1 12.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.00 2.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.04 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 82 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.67. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 0.48 4.41 4.21 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 982 982 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 0.48 4.41 4.21 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 982 982 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.34 3.15 3.01 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 704 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 83 / 215
———————0.390.39—0.980.98——————Dust
From
Material
Mo
vement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.58 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.0 18.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 18.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.0 16.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.8 11.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 84 / 215
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.96 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.69. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.54 0.45 4.05 4.10 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 982 982 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.54 0.45 4.05 4.10 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 982 982 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 85 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.89 2.93 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 704 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.53 0.53 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 17.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.7 15.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.6 11.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.8 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 86 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.92 1.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.95 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.71. Grading (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.52 0.44 3.81 4.06 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.14 — 0.14 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.52 0.44 3.81 4.06 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.14 — 0.14 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 87 / 215

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.37 0.31 2.72 2.90 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.50 0.53 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.3 17.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 17.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.3 15.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 88 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.3 11.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.88 1.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.91 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.73. Grading (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.51 0.43 3.62 4.04 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.51 0.43 3.62 4.04 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 89 / 215
Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 0.31 2.59 2.89 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 703 703 0.03 0.01 — 705 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.47 0.53 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 117 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 17.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 90 / 215
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.2 11.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.85 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.88 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.75. Grading (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.42 3.38 4.00 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 91 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.42 3.38 4.00 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.35 0.30 2.42 2.85 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.44 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.6 16.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 16.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 92 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.9 10.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.81 1.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.84 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.77. Grading (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.48 0.40 3.22 3.99 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 93 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.48 0.40 3.22 3.99 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.29 2.30 2.85 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.42 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 16.4 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 94 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.5 14.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.7 10.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.78 1.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.79. Grading (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.40 3.07 3.96 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 95 / 215
———————0.540.54—1.371.37——————Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.40 3.07 3.96 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.28 2.19 2.83 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.40 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 96 / 215
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.3 14.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.6 10.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.75 1.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.81. Grading (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 97 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.45 0.38 2.89 3.83 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.45 0.38 2.89 3.83 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 2.07 2.75 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 703 703 0.03 0.01 — 705 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.38 0.50 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 117 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 98 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 15.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 15.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.4 10.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.72 1.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.73 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.83. Grading (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 99 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.44 0.37 2.76 3.75 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.44 0.37 2.76 3.75 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 1.97 2.68 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.36 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 100 / 215
Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.6 15.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 15.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.9 13.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.71 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.85. Grading (2034) - Unmitigated
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 101 / 215
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.36 2.64 3.73 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.36 2.64 3.73 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.26 1.89 2.66 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 102 / 215
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.34 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.4 15.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.7 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 10.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 1.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 103 / 215

3.87. Grading (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.42 0.35 2.50 3.66 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.42 0.35 2.50 3.66 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 1.79 2.61 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 104 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 0.33 0.48 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.2 15.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.5 13.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.00 10.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.65 1.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.66 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 105 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.89. Grading (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.34 2.36 3.59 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.34 2.36 3.59 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.29 0.24 1.69 2.57 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 703 703 0.03 0.01 — 705 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 106 / 215
———————0.390.39—0.980.98——————Dust
From
Material
Mo
vement
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.31 0.47 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 117 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.92 9.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.97 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 107 / 215
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.64 1.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.65 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.91. Grading (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.33 2.27 3.56 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.33 2.27 3.56 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 108 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.24 1.62 2.54 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.30 0.46 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 14.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.80 9.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.85 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 109 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.62 1.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.93. Grading (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.13 3.45 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.13 3.45 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 110 / 215

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.27 0.23 1.52 2.46 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 701 701 0.03 0.01 — 703 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.28 0.45 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 14.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 111 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.71 9.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.61 1.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.95. Grading (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.05 3.38 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.05 3.38 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 981 981 0.04 0.01 — 985 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 112 / 215
Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 1.37 1.37 — 0.54 0.54 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.27 0.22 1.46 2.41 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 699 699 0.03 0.01 — 701 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.98 0.98 — 0.39 0.39 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.27 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 116 Dust
From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 14.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 113 / 215
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.61 9.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.66 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.59 1.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.60 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.97. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.13 1.79 16.7 19.5 0.03 0.74 — 0.74 0.68 — 0.68 — 3,562 3,562 0.14 0.03 — 3,574 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.13 1.79 16.7 19.5 0.03 0.74 — 0.74 0.68 — 0.68 — 3,562 3,562 0.14 0.03 — 3,574 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 114 / 215

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.53 1.28 11.9 14.0 0.02 0.53 — 0.53 0.49 — 0.49 — 2,551 2,551 0.10 0.02 — 2,560 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.23 2.18 2.55 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 422 422 0.02 < 0.005 — 424 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 36.3 34.3 18.7 305 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 46,519 46,519 2.76 1.94 186 47,352 Vendor 3.52 2.13 66.0 29.7 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 40,393 40,393 1.00 5.85 103 42,265 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 32.1 29.9 23.7 247 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 41,270 41,270 1.99 1.94 4.83 41,901 Vendor 3.32 1.93 70.3 30.8 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 40,464 40,464 0.93 5.85 2.68 42,234 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 23.4 21.9 14.7 179 0.00 0.00 28.8 28.8 0.00 6.74 6.74 — 30,620 30,620 2.10 1.39 57.7 31,143 Vendor 2.43 1.43 49.1 21.5 0.19 0.38 7.15 7.53 0.38 1.98 2.36 — 28,953 28,953 0.71 4.19 31.9 30,251 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 115 / 215
Worker 4.27 3.99 2.68 32.7 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 5,069 5,069 0.35 0.23 9.55 5,156 Vendor 0.44 0.26 8.96 3.92 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,793 4,793 0.12 0.69 5.28 5,008 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.99. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.00 1.67 15.5 19.4 0.03 0.64 — 0.64 0.59 — 0.59 — 3,562 3,562 0.14 0.03 — 3,574 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.00 1.67 15.5 19.4 0.03 0.64 — 0.64 0.59 — 0.59 — 3,562 3,562 0.14 0.03 — 3,574 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.43 1.20 11.1 13.8 0.02 0.46 — 0.46 0.42 — 0.42 — 2,544 2,544 0.10 0.02 — 2,553 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 2.02 2.53 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 423 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 116 / 215

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 34.1 32.2 17.1 280 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 45,527 45,527 1.32 1.94 170 46,308 Vendor 3.26 2.13 63.9 28.3 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 39,668 39,668 1.00 5.85 103 41,540 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 30.5 28.2 20.6 226 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 40,405 40,405 1.82 1.94 4.41 41,032 Vendor 2.99 1.93 68.0 29.7 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 39,742 39,742 0.93 5.85 2.68 41,511 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 21.9 20.5 13.4 164 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 29,894 29,894 1.18 1.38 52.6 30,389 Vendor 2.23 1.42 47.2 20.7 0.19 0.38 7.13 7.51 0.38 1.97 2.35 — 28,357 28,357 0.66 4.18 31.8 29,650 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.99 3.74 2.44 30.0 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,949 4,949 0.20 0.23 8.71 5,031 Vendor 0.41 0.26 8.62 3.77 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,695 4,695 0.11 0.69 5.26 4,909 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.101. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 117 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.90 1.59 14.6 19.3 0.03 0.56 — 0.56 0.52 — 0.52 — 3,561 3,561 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.90 1.59 14.6 19.3 0.03 0.56 — 0.56 0.52 — 0.52 — 3,561 3,561 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.36 1.14 10.5 13.8 0.02 0.40 — 0.40 0.37 — 0.37 — 2,544 2,544 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.91 2.51 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 423 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 31.8 29.9 15.5 257 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 44,579 44,579 1.32 1.94 155 45,344 Vendor 3.19 2.13 61.8 27.6 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 38,920 38,920 0.93 5.85 90.9 40,777 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 118 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Worker 27.4 26.6 19.0 208 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 39,578 39,578 1.66 1.94 4.01 40,200 Vendor 2.99 1.93 65.9 28.9 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 38,995 38,995 0.93 5.85 2.36 40,764 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.7 19.3 12.2 151 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 29,280 29,280 1.06 1.38 47.7 29,766 Vendor 2.18 1.42 45.7 20.0 0.19 0.38 7.13 7.51 0.38 1.97 2.35 — 27,822 27,822 0.66 4.18 28.0 29,112 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.78 3.53 2.23 27.6 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,848 4,848 0.18 0.23 7.89 4,928 Vendor 0.40 0.26 8.35 3.66 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,606 4,606 0.11 0.69 4.63 4,820 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.103. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.83 1.53 13.9 19.2 0.03 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 3,561 3,561 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 119 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

1.83 1.53 13.9 19.2 0.03 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 3,561 3,561 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.31 1.09 9.96 13.7 0.02 0.36 — 0.36 0.33 — 0.33 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 0.20 1.82 2.51 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 423 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 28.9 28.2 13.9 238 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 43,650 43,650 1.16 1.77 140 44,347 Vendor 3.19 2.13 59.8 26.9 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 38,090 38,090 0.93 5.58 79.9 39,858 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 25.7 23.8 17.3 193 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 38,764 38,764 1.66 1.94 3.63 39,386 Vendor 2.99 1.93 63.6 28.0 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 38,167 38,167 0.93 5.58 2.07 39,857 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 18.6 18.1 11.1 140 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 28,675 28,675 0.95 1.38 43.1 29,154 Vendor 2.18 1.42 44.4 19.5 0.19 0.38 7.13 7.51 0.38 1.97 2.35 — 27,230 27,230 0.66 3.99 24.6 28,460 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 120 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.40 3.31 2.02 25.5 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,748 4,748 0.16 0.23 7.14 4,827 Vendor 0.40 0.26 8.10 3.56 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,508 4,508 0.11 0.66 4.08 4,712 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.105. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.76 1.47 13.3 19.2 0.03 0.45 — 0.45 0.41 — 0.41 — 3,561 3,561 0.14 0.03 — 3,574 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.76 1.47 13.3 19.2 0.03 0.45 — 0.45 0.41 — 0.41 — 3,561 3,561 0.14 0.03 — 3,574 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.26 1.05 9.50 13.8 0.02 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 2,551 2,551 0.10 0.02 — 2,560 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 121 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.73 2.51 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 422 422 0.02 < 0.005 — 424 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 27.5 25.8 12.3 221 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 42,808 42,808 1.16 1.77 126 43,490 Vendor 2.86 1.99 58.0 26.1 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 37,158 37,158 0.93 5.58 70.4 38,916 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 24.6 22.6 15.7 178 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 38,023 38,023 1.49 1.94 3.26 38,640 Vendor 2.66 1.93 61.6 27.3 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 37,236 37,236 0.93 5.58 1.83 38,925 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.8 16.4 9.95 130 0.00 0.00 28.8 28.8 0.00 6.74 6.74 — 28,203 28,203 0.95 1.27 38.9 28,644 Vendor 2.00 1.43 43.0 19.0 0.19 0.38 7.15 7.53 0.38 1.98 2.36 — 26,638 26,638 0.67 4.00 21.8 27,868 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.25 3.00 1.82 23.8 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,669 4,669 0.16 0.21 6.44 4,742 Vendor 0.36 0.26 7.86 3.48 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,410 4,410 0.11 0.66 3.60 4,614 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.107. Building Construction (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 122 / 215
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.71 1.43 12.7 19.2 0.03 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.71 1.43 12.7 19.2 0.03 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.22 1.02 9.11 13.7 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.19 1.66 2.50 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 25.9 24.1 10.8 206 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 42,016 42,016 0.99 1.77 112 42,681 Vendor 2.79 1.73 55.9 25.7 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 36,169 36,169 0.93 5.32 62.0 37,839 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 123 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 23.2 21.3 14.2 167 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 37,329 37,329 1.49 1.94 2.92 37,946 Vendor 2.66 1.60 59.5 26.8 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 36,247 36,247 0.93 5.32 1.60 37,857 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.7 15.3 8.89 121 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 27,612 27,612 0.83 1.27 34.6 28,044 Vendor 1.99 1.19 41.4 18.7 0.19 0.38 7.13 7.51 0.38 1.97 2.35 — 25,858 25,858 0.66 3.80 19.1 27,026 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.05 2.80 1.62 22.0 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,571 4,571 0.14 0.21 5.73 4,643 Vendor 0.36 0.22 7.56 3.41 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,281 4,281 0.11 0.63 3.16 4,474 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.109. Building Construction (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.67 1.40 12.5 19.1 0.03 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 124 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

1.67 1.40 12.5 19.1 0.03 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.19 1.00 8.90 13.7 0.02 0.28 — 0.28 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.62 2.49 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 24.6 22.8 10.5 192 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 41,270 41,270 0.99 0.50 99.9 41,543 Vendor 2.79 1.73 54.4 25.3 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 35,129 35,129 0.66 5.25 54.0 36,765 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.6 20.0 12.6 156 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 36,674 36,674 1.32 1.77 2.59 37,237 Vendor 2.66 1.53 57.7 26.3 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.53 2.80 3.33 — 35,208 35,208 0.66 5.32 1.40 36,811 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.9 14.6 7.75 112 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 27,126 27,126 0.83 1.27 30.9 27,555 Vendor 1.95 1.19 40.3 18.4 0.19 0.38 7.13 7.51 0.38 1.97 2.35 — 25,116 25,116 0.47 3.75 16.7 26,262 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 125 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.90 2.67 1.41 20.5 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,491 4,491 0.14 0.21 5.11 4,562 Vendor 0.36 0.22 7.36 3.35 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.07 0.36 0.43 — 4,158 4,158 0.08 0.62 2.77 4,348 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.111. Building Construction (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.63 1.36 12.1 19.1 0.03 0.36 — 0.36 0.33 — 0.33 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.63 1.36 12.1 19.1 0.03 0.36 — 0.36 0.33 — 0.33 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.16 0.97 8.61 13.6 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 126 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.18 1.57 2.49 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 21.8 21.3 9.07 180 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 40,587 40,587 0.83 0.50 88.4 40,845 Vendor 2.79 1.73 52.9 24.9 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 34,061 34,061 0.66 4.99 47.2 35,610 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 19.7 19.2 11.0 145 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 36,072 36,072 1.16 1.77 2.30 36,631 Vendor 2.53 1.46 56.2 25.9 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 34,141 34,141 0.66 5.05 1.22 35,664 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 14.2 13.8 7.63 105 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 26,680 26,680 0.71 0.35 27.2 26,831 Vendor 1.90 1.14 39.0 18.0 0.19 0.38 7.13 7.51 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 24,353 24,353 0.47 3.56 14.5 25,441 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.58 2.52 1.39 19.2 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,417 4,417 0.12 0.06 4.51 4,442 Vendor 0.35 0.21 7.12 3.29 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 4,032 4,032 0.08 0.59 2.40 4,212 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.113. Building Construction (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 127 / 215
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.59 1.33 11.7 19.0 0.03 0.33 — 0.33 0.31 — 0.31 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.59 1.33 11.7 19.0 0.03 0.33 — 0.33 0.31 — 0.31 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.14 0.95 8.37 13.6 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 2,550 2,550 0.10 0.02 — 2,559 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.17 1.53 2.48 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 422 422 0.02 < 0.005 — 424 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.3 20.0 8.91 169 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 39,953 39,953 0.83 0.50 77.7 40,199 Vendor 2.73 1.66 51.3 24.5 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 33,023 33,023 0.66 4.99 40.3 34,566 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 128 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 18.5 18.0 10.8 136 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 35,513 35,513 1.16 0.50 2.01 35,692 Vendor 2.53 1.46 54.7 25.5 0.27 0.53 10.1 10.6 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 33,104 33,104 0.66 4.99 1.05 34,607 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 13.4 13.0 6.50 99.5 0.00 0.00 28.8 28.8 0.00 6.74 6.74 — 26,338 26,338 0.71 0.36 24.0 26,486 Vendor 1.86 1.14 38.1 17.9 0.19 0.38 7.15 7.53 0.19 1.98 2.17 — 23,677 23,677 0.48 3.57 12.5 24,765 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.44 2.37 1.19 18.2 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,361 4,361 0.12 0.06 3.98 4,385 Vendor 0.34 0.21 6.95 3.26 0.03 0.07 1.30 1.37 0.03 0.36 0.40 — 3,920 3,920 0.08 0.59 2.07 4,100 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.115. Building Construction (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.56 1.30 11.4 19.0 0.03 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 129 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

1.56 1.30 11.4 19.0 0.03 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.11 0.93 8.13 13.6 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.48 2.47 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 19.5 19.2 7.47 159 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 39,395 39,395 0.83 0.50 67.8 39,632 Vendor 2.39 1.66 49.9 24.2 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 32,038 32,038 0.66 4.72 34.3 33,496 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.7 17.3 9.40 128 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 35,020 35,020 1.16 0.50 1.76 35,199 Vendor 2.26 1.46 53.3 25.1 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 32,119 32,119 0.66 4.72 0.89 33,544 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 12.7 12.5 6.36 93.6 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 25,901 25,901 0.71 0.35 21.0 26,045 Vendor 1.66 1.14 36.9 17.6 0.19 0.19 7.13 7.32 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 22,909 22,909 0.47 3.37 10.6 23,936 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 130 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.32 2.28 1.16 17.1 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,288 4,288 0.12 0.06 3.47 4,312 Vendor 0.30 0.21 6.74 3.21 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.34 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 3,793 3,793 0.08 0.56 1.75 3,963 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.117. Building Construction (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.53 1.28 11.2 19.0 0.03 0.29 — 0.29 0.26 — 0.26 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.53 1.28 11.2 19.0 0.03 0.29 — 0.29 0.26 — 0.26 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.09 0.92 7.98 13.5 0.02 0.20 — 0.20 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 131 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.17 1.46 2.47 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 18.3 18.0 7.30 152 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 38,888 38,888 0.83 0.50 58.7 39,116 Vendor 2.39 1.66 48.7 23.9 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 31,112 31,112 0.66 4.72 28.9 32,564 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.8 16.3 9.24 121 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 34,571 34,571 0.99 0.50 1.52 34,746 Vendor 2.26 1.46 52.2 24.8 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 31,194 31,194 0.66 4.72 0.75 32,618 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 12.0 11.8 6.24 88.9 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 25,570 25,570 0.59 0.35 18.1 25,709 Vendor 1.66 1.14 36.1 17.3 0.19 0.19 7.13 7.32 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 22,247 22,247 0.47 3.37 8.91 23,273 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.19 2.15 1.14 16.2 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,233 4,233 0.10 0.06 3.00 4,256 Vendor 0.30 0.21 6.60 3.16 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.34 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 3,683 3,683 0.08 0.56 1.48 3,853 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.119. Building Construction (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 132 / 215
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.50 1.26 10.9 18.8 0.03 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.50 1.26 10.9 18.8 0.03 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 0.90 7.78 13.5 0.02 0.19 — 0.19 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.20 0.16 1.42 2.46 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.8 17.7 7.14 145 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 38,435 38,435 0.66 0.50 50.7 38,650 Vendor 2.39 1.66 47.6 23.8 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 30,246 30,246 0.66 4.45 24.0 31,614 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 133 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.3 15.8 9.07 116 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 34,171 34,171 0.99 0.50 1.31 34,345 Vendor 2.19 1.40 51.1 24.5 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 30,328 30,328 0.66 4.45 0.62 31,672 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 11.8 11.4 5.33 84.5 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 25,273 25,273 0.59 0.35 15.6 25,409 Vendor 1.66 1.14 35.3 17.1 0.19 0.19 7.13 7.32 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 21,629 21,629 0.47 3.18 7.39 22,596 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.15 2.09 0.97 15.4 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,184 4,184 0.10 0.06 2.59 4,207 Vendor 0.30 0.21 6.45 3.12 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.34 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 3,581 3,581 0.08 0.53 1.22 3,741 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.121. Building Construction (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.48 1.23 10.6 18.7 0.03 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 134 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

1.48 1.23 10.6 18.7 0.03 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.06 0.88 7.58 13.4 0.02 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 2,550 2,550 0.10 0.02 — 2,559 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.38 2.45 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 422 422 0.02 < 0.005 — 424 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.3 17.0 7.14 138 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 38,027 38,027 0.66 0.50 43.2 38,235 Vendor 2.39 1.66 46.7 23.5 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 29,467 29,467 0.66 4.45 19.7 30,830 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.0 15.7 7.63 110 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 33,808 33,808 0.99 0.50 1.12 33,982 Vendor 2.19 1.40 49.9 24.5 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 29,549 29,549 0.66 4.45 0.51 30,893 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 11.6 11.3 5.23 80.4 0.00 0.00 28.8 28.8 0.00 6.74 6.74 — 25,073 25,073 0.59 0.36 13.4 25,208 Vendor 1.67 1.14 34.8 17.1 0.19 0.19 7.15 7.34 0.19 1.98 2.17 — 21,130 21,130 0.48 3.19 6.10 22,099 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 135 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.11 2.07 0.95 14.7 0.00 0.00 5.25 5.25 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,151 4,151 0.10 0.06 2.23 4,173 Vendor 0.30 0.21 6.35 3.12 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.34 0.03 0.36 0.40 — 3,498 3,498 0.08 0.53 1.01 3,659 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.123. Building Construction (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.45 1.22 10.4 18.6 0.03 0.23 — 0.23 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.45 1.22 10.4 18.6 0.03 0.23 — 0.23 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.04 0.87 7.41 13.3 0.02 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 136 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.35 2.42 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.3 16.0 5.70 133 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 37,668 37,668 0.66 0.50 36.8 37,869 Vendor 2.39 1.66 45.9 23.3 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 28,771 28,771 0.66 4.45 16.0 30,131 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.3 13.7 7.47 106 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 33,490 33,490 0.83 0.50 0.96 33,659 Vendor 2.19 1.40 49.1 24.1 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 28,854 28,854 0.60 4.45 0.41 30,197 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 10.8 9.82 5.10 77.1 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 24,770 24,770 0.59 0.35 11.4 24,902 Vendor 1.61 1.09 34.0 16.9 0.19 0.19 7.13 7.32 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 20,576 20,576 0.47 3.18 4.92 21,541 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.98 1.79 0.93 14.1 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,101 4,101 0.10 0.06 1.88 4,123 Vendor 0.29 0.20 6.20 3.08 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.34 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 3,407 3,407 0.08 0.53 0.81 3,566 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.125. Building Construction (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 137 / 215
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.21 10.2 18.5 0.03 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.21 10.2 18.5 0.03 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 0.86 7.31 13.2 0.02 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 2,543 2,543 0.10 0.02 — 2,552 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.33 2.41 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 421 421 0.02 < 0.005 — 422 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.5 13.9 5.70 129 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 37,335 37,335 0.66 0.50 31.2 37,530 Vendor 2.39 1.66 45.1 23.2 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 28,152 28,152 0.66 4.19 12.8 29,430 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 138 / 215
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 14.9 13.2 7.47 101 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 33,194 33,194 0.83 0.50 0.81 33,363 Vendor 2.13 1.46 48.3 24.1 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 28,235 28,235 0.60 4.19 0.33 29,498 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 10.6 9.46 5.10 74.2 0.00 0.00 28.7 28.7 0.00 6.72 6.72 — 24,551 24,551 0.47 0.35 9.62 24,678 Vendor 1.61 1.09 33.4 16.9 0.19 0.19 7.13 7.32 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 20,133 20,133 0.43 2.99 3.94 21,040 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.94 1.73 0.93 13.5 0.00 0.00 5.24 5.24 0.00 1.23 1.23 — 4,065 4,065 0.08 0.06 1.59 4,086 Vendor 0.29 0.20 6.09 3.08 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.34 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 3,333 3,333 0.07 0.50 0.65 3,483 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.127. Building Construction (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.43 1.20 10.1 18.4 0.03 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 139 / 215
Off-Road
Equipment

1.43 1.20 10.1 18.4 0.03 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 3,560 3,560 0.14 0.03 — 3,573 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.02 0.85 7.17 13.1 0.02 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,536 2,536 0.10 0.02 — 2,545 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.31 2.40 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 420 420 0.02 < 0.005 — 421 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 14.9 13.2 5.53 125 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 37,059 37,059 0.66 0.50 26.3 37,250 Vendor 2.39 1.66 44.4 23.2 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 27,600 27,600 0.60 4.19 10.1 28,874 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 14.2 12.6 7.30 98.2 0.00 0.00 40.9 40.9 0.00 9.58 9.58 — 32,949 32,949 0.83 0.50 0.68 33,118 Vendor 2.13 1.46 47.6 24.1 0.27 0.27 10.1 10.4 0.27 2.80 3.06 — 27,684 27,684 0.60 4.19 0.26 28,947 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 9.99 8.84 4.06 72.1 0.00 0.00 28.6 28.6 0.00 6.70 6.70 — 24,303 24,303 0.47 0.35 8.06 24,428 Vendor 1.61 1.09 33.0 16.8 0.19 0.19 7.11 7.30 0.19 1.97 2.16 — 19,686 19,686 0.43 2.98 3.12 20,588 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 140 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.82 1.61 0.74 13.2 0.00 0.00 5.22 5.22 0.00 1.22 1.22 — 4,024 4,024 0.08 0.06 1.34 4,044 Vendor 0.29 0.20 6.02 3.07 0.03 0.03 1.30 1.33 0.03 0.36 0.39 — 3,259 3,259 0.07 0.49 0.52 3,409 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.129. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.09 0.82 1.05 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.09 0.82 1.05 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.06 0.59 0.75 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 114 114 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 141 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.9 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.79 9.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 9.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.68 8.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.82 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.44 6.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.07 1.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 142 / 215

3.131. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.08 0.78 1.05 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.08 0.78 1.05 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.56 0.75 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 143 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.58 9.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 9.74 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.50 8.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.63 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.29 6.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.39 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.06 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.133. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 144 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.08 0.75 1.04 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.08 0.75 1.04 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.53 0.75 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 145 / 215
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.38 9.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 9.54 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.33 8.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.46 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.16 6.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.26 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.02 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.04 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.135. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 0.73 1.05 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 146 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 0.73 1.05 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.52 0.75 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.18 9.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 9.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 147 / 215
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.16 8.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.29 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.13 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.137. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.07 0.70 1.04 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.07 0.70 1.04 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 148 / 215
Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.50 0.75 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 114 114 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.9 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.01 9.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 9.15 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.00 8.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.13 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.93 5.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.03 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 149 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.98 0.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.139. Paving (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.68 1.04 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.68 1.04 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.48 0.74 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 150 / 215
Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.84 8.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.98 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.85 7.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.98 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.81 5.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.96 0.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.98 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 151 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.141. Paving (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.66 1.04 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.66 1.04 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.47 0.74 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 152 / 215
Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.68 8.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.74 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.72 7.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.83 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.71 5.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.94 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.96 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.143. Paving (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 153 / 215
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.64 1.04 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.64 1.04 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.46 0.74 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 154 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.54 8.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.59 7.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.71 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.61 5.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.65 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.93 0.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.93 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.145. Paving (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 155 / 215
159—< 0.0050.01159159—0.02—0.020.02—0.02< 0.0051.040.630.060.08Off-Road Equipment
Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.06 0.63 1.04 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 0.45 0.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 114 114 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.9 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.41 8.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.46 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 156 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.51 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.54 5.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.57 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.92 0.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.147. Paving (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.62 1.03 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 157 / 215
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.62 1.03 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.44 0.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.29 8.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.37 7.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.41 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 158 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.45 5.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.48 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.90 0.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.91 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.149. Paving (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.61 1.03 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.61 1.03 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 159 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.44 0.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.18 8.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.27 7.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.31 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.38 5.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.41 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 160 / 215
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.151. Paving (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.60 1.03 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.60 1.03 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.43 0.73 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 161 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.09 8.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.13 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.19 7.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.23 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.32 5.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.35 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.88 0.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 162 / 215

3.153. Paving (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.59 1.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.59 1.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.42 0.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 114 114 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.9 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 163 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.00 8.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.04 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.11 7.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.15 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.28 5.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.30 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.87 0.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.88 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.155. Paving (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 164 / 215
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.58 1.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.58 1.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.41 0.73 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 165 / 215
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.93 7.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.97 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.05 7.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.21 5.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.24 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.157. Paving (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.57 1.02 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 166 / 215
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.57 1.02 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 0.40 0.73 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 114 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.86 7.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.90 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 167 / 215
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.98 6.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.19 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.86 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.159. Paving (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.56 1.02 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.56 1.02 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 159 159 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 168 / 215
Paving 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 0.40 0.73 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 113 Paving 0.03 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 18.7 18.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.8 Paving 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.80 7.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.84 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.93 6.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.97 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.11 5.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.14 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 169 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.85 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.161. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.10 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.10 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 170 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.83 9.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.51 0.49 0.27 4.33 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 660 660 0.04 0.03 2.64 672 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.42 0.34 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 586 586 0.03 0.03 0.07 595 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.31 0.21 2.55 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 435 435 0.03 0.02 0.82 442 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 171 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 72.0 72.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 73.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.163. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 172 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.48 0.46 0.24 3.97 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 646 646 0.02 0.03 2.42 657 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.43 0.40 0.29 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 574 574 0.03 0.03 0.06 582 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.31 0.29 0.19 2.33 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 424 424 0.02 0.02 0.75 431 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 173 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 70.3 70.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 71.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.165. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 174 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.45 0.42 0.22 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 633 633 0.02 0.03 2.20 644 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.39 0.38 0.27 2.95 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 562 562 0.02 0.03 0.06 571 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.29 0.27 0.17 2.15 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 416 416 0.02 0.02 0.68 423 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 175 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 68.8 68.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 70.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.167. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 176 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.41 0.40 0.20 3.37 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 620 620 0.02 0.03 1.98 629 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.37 0.34 0.25 2.74 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 550 550 0.02 0.03 0.05 559 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.26 0.16 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 407 407 0.01 0.02 0.61 414 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 177 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 67.4 67.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 68.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.169. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 178 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.83 9.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.39 0.37 0.17 3.14 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 608 608 0.02 0.03 1.79 617 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.32 0.22 2.53 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 540 540 0.02 0.03 0.05 548 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.23 0.14 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 400 400 0.01 0.02 0.55 407 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 179 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 66.3 66.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 67.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.171. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 180 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.37 0.34 0.15 2.93 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 596 596 0.01 0.03 1.59 606 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.33 0.30 0.20 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 530 530 0.02 0.03 0.04 539 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.24 0.22 0.13 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 392 392 0.01 0.02 0.49 398 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 181 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 64.9 64.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 65.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.173. Architectural Coating (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 182 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.35 0.32 0.15 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 586 586 0.01 0.01 1.42 590 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.29 0.28 0.18 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 521 521 0.02 0.03 0.04 529 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.21 0.11 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 385 385 0.01 0.02 0.44 391 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 183 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 63.7 63.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 64.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.175. Architectural Coating (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 184 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.31 0.30 0.13 2.55 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 576 576 0.01 0.01 1.25 580 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.28 0.27 0.16 2.05 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 512 512 0.02 0.03 0.03 520 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.20 0.11 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 379 379 0.01 0.01 0.39 381 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 185 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 62.7 62.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 63.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.177. Architectural Coating (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 186 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.83 9.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.29 0.28 0.13 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 567 567 0.01 0.01 1.10 571 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.26 0.15 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 504 504 0.02 0.01 0.03 507 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.19 0.18 0.09 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 374 374 0.01 0.01 0.34 376 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 187 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 61.9 61.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 62.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.179. Architectural Coating (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 188 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.28 0.27 0.11 2.26 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 559 559 0.01 0.01 0.96 563 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.25 0.13 1.82 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 497 497 0.02 0.01 0.02 500 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.18 0.18 0.09 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 368 368 0.01 0.01 0.30 370 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 189 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 60.9 60.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 61.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.181. Architectural Coating (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 190 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.26 0.26 0.10 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 552 552 0.01 0.01 0.83 555 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.24 0.23 0.13 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 491 491 0.01 0.01 0.02 493 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.17 0.17 0.09 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 363 363 0.01 0.01 0.26 365 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 191 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 60.1 60.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 60.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.183. Architectural Coating (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 192 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.25 0.10 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 546 546 0.01 0.01 0.72 549 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.22 0.13 1.64 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 485 485 0.01 0.01 0.02 487 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.17 0.16 0.08 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 359 359 0.01 0.01 0.22 361 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 193 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 59.4 59.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 59.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.185. Architectural Coating (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 194 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.83 9.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.67 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.24 0.10 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 540 540 0.01 0.01 0.61 543 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.22 0.11 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 480 480 0.01 0.01 0.02 482 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.16 0.16 0.07 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 356 356 0.01 0.01 0.19 358 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 195 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 58.9 58.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 59.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.187. Architectural Coating (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 196 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.23 0.08 1.89 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 535 535 0.01 0.01 0.52 538 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.20 0.11 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 475 475 0.01 0.01 0.01 478 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.14 0.07 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 352 352 0.01 0.01 0.16 353 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 197 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 58.2 58.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 58.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.189. Architectural Coating (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 198 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.0 10.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.81 9.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.79 1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.20 0.08 1.83 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 530 530 0.01 0.01 0.44 533 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.19 0.11 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 471 471 0.01 0.01 0.01 474 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.13 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 348 348 0.01 0.01 0.14 350 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 199 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 57.7 57.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 58.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.191. Architectural Coating (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.0 14.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.1 Architect
ural
Coatings

13.7 13.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 200 / 215
——————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.99 9.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.0 Architect
ural
Coatings

9.78 9.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.65 1.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.66 Architect
ural
Coatings

1.78 1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.19 0.08 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 526 526 0.01 0.01 0.37 529 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.20 0.18 0.10 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.14 0.14 — 468 468 0.01 0.01 0.01 470 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.14 0.13 0.06 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.10 0.10 — 345 345 0.01 0.01 0.11 347 Fresno SCSP 2024-2040 (100% Construction) Detailed Report, 7/4/2024 201 / 215
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 57.1 57.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 57.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —