25-1316 Consultant Service Agreement On Call CEQA- Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. — Fresno City Council, October 30, 2025 (part 2 of 3)

Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards provide guidance on construction techniques to maximize energy conservation and it is expected that contractors and owners have a strong financial incentive to use recycled materials and products originating from nearby sources in order to reduce materials costs.

As such, it is anticipated that materials used in construction and construction vehicle fuel energy would not involve the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy.

Operational Project energy consumption would occur for multiple purposes, including but not limited to, building heating and cooling, refrigeration, ligh ting, electronics, and office equipment. Operational energy would also be consumed during each vehicle trip associated with the proposed use. CalEEMod was utilized to generate the estimated energy dema nd of the proposed Project, and the results are provided in Table 4 and in Appendix A.

Table 4 – Annual Project Energy Consumption by Land Use Land Use Electricity Use in
kWh/year
Natural Gas
Use in
kBTU/year
Annual Energy
Consumption (in
Million BTU)
Office Park 1,049,400 2,050,200 5,630.9
Parking Lot 46,060 0 157.2
Total 1,095,460 2,050,200 5,788.1

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-36
The proposed Project would be required to comply with Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which provide minimum efficiency standards related to various building features, including appliances, water and space heating and cooling equipment, building insulation and roofing, and lighting.

Implementation of Title 24 standards significantly increases energy savings, and it is generally assumed that compliance with Title 24 ensures projects will not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy.

As discussed in Impact XVII – Transportation/Traffic, the proposed Project would generate approximately 993 daily vehicle trips. The length of these trips and the individual vehicle fuel efficiencies are not known; therefore, the resulting energy consumption cannot be accurately calculated. However, it can be assumed that such a volume of vehicle trips would consume a generous amount of fuel. Adopted federal vehicle fuel standards have continually improved since their original adoption in 1975 and assists in avoiding the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary use of energy by vehicles. Additionally, the proposed Project will be located in a major shopping area that is surrounded by residential land uses. A high-frequency bus line is within ¼ mile of the pr oposed Project and the site will be developed with pedestrian accessibility in mind, which will reduce VMT, thereby further reducing the amount of energy consumed by the proposed Project.

As discussed previously, the proposed Project would be required to implement and be consistent with existing energy design standards at the local and state level. The Project would be subject to energy conservation requirements in the California Ener gy Code and CALGreen. Adherence to state code requirements would ensure that the Project would no t result in wasteful and inefficient use of non- renewable resources due to building operation.

Therefore, any impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-37
VII. GEOLOGY AND
SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area
or based
on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.

ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?

iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?

c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spr
eading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?

d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the most recently

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-38
VII. GEOLOGY AND
SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
adopted Uniform Building Code
creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?

f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
The Project site is located within the San Joaquin Valley structural basin, bounded to the east by the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range and to the west by the Coastal Ranges. The Project area is located on the high alluvial fan of the San Joaquin River. The site is relatively flat at an elevation of 320 feet above mean sea level in an area of intense urban uses. The Project site is mapped as containing soils classified as San Joaquin Sandy Loam, shallow, 0-3 percent slopes (Natural Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey Geographic Database).

RESPONSES
a-i. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-39
a-ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? a-iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? a-iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is not located in an earthquake fault zone as delineated by the 1972 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Act. The nearest known potentially active fault is the Clovis Fault, located about nine miles east of the site. No active faults have been mapped within the Project boundaries, so there is no potential for fault rupture. It is anticipated that the proposed Project site would be subject to some ground acceleration and ground shaking associated with seismic activity during its design life. The Project site would be engineered and constructed in strict accordance with the earthquake resistant design requirements contained in the latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC) for seismic zone III, as well as Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, and therefore would avoid potential seismically induced hazards on planned structures. The impact of seismic hazards on the Project would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Construction activities associated with the Project involves excavation of existing asphalt pavement an d concrete as well as ground preparation work for the new office building and parking areas. These activities could expose barren soils to sources of wind or water, resulting in the potential for erosion and sedimentation on and off the Project site.

During construction, nuisance flow caused by minor rain could flow off-site. The City and/or contractor would be required to employ appropriate sediment and erosion control BMPs as part of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would be required in the California National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). In addition, soil erosion and loss of topsoil would be minimized through implementation of the SVJAPCD fugitive dust control measures (See Section III). Once construction is complete, the Project would not result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil.

Mitigation Measure GEO – 1 (requirement to prepare a SWPPP) will ensure that impacts remain less than significant.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-40
Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures GEO – 1. See attached Project-specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the most recently adopted Uniform Building Code creating substantial risks to life or property?

Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. See Section VIa. above. The site is not at significant risk from earthquakes, ground shaking, liquefac tion, or landslide and is otherwise considered geologically stable. Subsidence is typically related to over-extraction of groundwater from certain types of geologic formations where the water is partly responsible for supporting the ground surface.

However, the site may be subject to soil hazards including existing fills and settlement potential that could adversely impact proposed structures. Mitigation Measure GEO – 2 (requirement for a design level geotechnical analysis) will reduce impacts to a less than significant level.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures GEO – 2. See attached Project-specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The Project does not include the construction, replacement, or disturbance of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. The Project will be required to tie into existing sewer services (See Utilities section for more details). Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Less Than Significant Impact. As identified in the previous cultural studies perform for the Project site, there are no known paleontological resources on or near the site. (See Section V. for more details). Mitigation measures have been added that will protect unknown (buried) resources during construction, including paleontological resources. In addition, the site is substantially developed -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-41
with the remainder a dirt lot that has been graded. There are no unique geological features on site or in the area. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with Project-specific mitigation measures incorporated, the Project will not result in any geological impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015. -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-42
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS

EMISSIONS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?

b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
Various gases in the earth’s atmosphere play an important role in moderating the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters earth’s atmosphere from space and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface. The earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. GHGs are transparent to solar radiation, but are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. Consequently, radiation that would otherwise escape back into space is retained, resulting in a warming of the earth’s atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenho use effect. Scientific research to date indicates that some of the observed climate change is a result of increased GHG emissions associated with human activity. Among the GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO 2),
methane (CH4), ozone, Nitrous Oxide (NOx), and chlorofluorocarbons. Human-caused emissions of these GHGs in excess of natural ambient concentrations are considered responsible for enhancing the greenhouse effect. GHG emissions contributing to glob al climate change are attributable, in large part, to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors.

In California, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by electricity generation.

Global climate change is, indeed, a global issue. GH Gs are global pollutants, unlike criteria pollutants and TACs (which are pollutants of regional and/or loc al concern). Global climate change, if it occurs, could potentially affect water resources in California. Rising temperatures could be anticipated to result in sea-level rise (as polar ice caps melt) and possib ly change the timing and amount of precipitation, which could alter water quality. According to some, climate change could result in more extreme weather patterns; both heavier precipitation that could lead to flooding, as well as more extended drought -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-43
periods. There is uncertainty regarding the timing, magnitude, and nature of the potential changes to water resources as a result of climate change; however, several trends are evident.

Snowpack and snowmelt may also be affected by climate change. Much of California’s precipitation falls as snow in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascades, and snowpack represents approximately 35 percent of the state’s useable annual water supply. The snowmelt typically occurs from April through July; it provides natural water flow to streams and reservoirs after the annual rainy season has ended. As air temperatures increase due to climate change, the water stored in California’s snowpack could be affected by increasing temperatures resulting in: (1) decreased snowfall, and (2) earlier snowmelt.

RESPONSES
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less Than Significant Impact. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published a rule for the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gases from sour ces that in general emit 25,000 metric tons or more of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year. As shown in the CalEEMod results (Appendix A), the Project will produce the following CO2:

Construction (2019) 252.66 MT/yr
Construction (2020) 275.50 MT/yr
Operation (2020) 1,071.07 MT/yr
Combined: 1,599.23 MT/yr
To be conservative, the proposed Project construction and operational CO2 emissions are combined and the Project is estimated to produce 1,599.23 tons per year of CO2. This represents approximately six percent of the reporting threshold.

The City of Fresno prepared a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Appendix F-2 of the General Plan MEIR) as part of the General Plan Update, which included an emission reduction target for demonstrating consistency with State greenhouse gas reduction targets. The General Plan contains several policies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Due to its proposed location at the Fig Garden Financial Center, as well as its location on a vacant / underutilized parcel, the Project is consistent with the following policies:
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-44
Policy UF-12-b: Activity Centers. Mixed-use designated areas along BRT and/or transit corridors are appropriate for more intensive concentratio ns of urban uses. Typical uses could include commercial areas; employment centers; schools; compact residential development; religious institutions; parks; and other gathering points where residents may interact, work, and obtain goods and services in the same place.

Policy UF-12-e: Access to Activity Centers. Promote adoption and implementation of standards supporting pedestrian activities and bicycle linkages from surrounding land uses and neighborhoods into Activity Centers and to transit stops. Provide for priority transit routes and facilities to serve the Activity Centers.

Policy LU-2-a: Infill Development and Redevelopment. Promote development of vacant, underdeveloped, and redevelopable land within the City Limits where urban services are available by considering the establishment and implementation of supportive regulations and programs.

Policy MT-2-c: Reduce VMT through Infill Development. Provide incentives for infill development that would provide jobs and services closer to housing and multi-modal transportation corridors, and vice versa, in order to reduce citywide vehicle miles travelled.

Policy RC-2-a Link Land Use to Transportation. Promote mixed-use, higher density infill development in multi-modal corridors. Support land use patterns that make more efficient use of the transportation system and plan future transportation investments in areas of higher- intensity development. Discourage investment in infrastructure that would not meet these criteria.

Policy RC-8-a Existing Standards and Programs. Continue existing beneficial energy conservation programs, including adhering to the California Energy Code in new construction and major renovations.

In addition, the proposed Project will comply with the following City of Fresno GHG Reduction Plan strategies:
x Energy Efficiency in New Buildings: the Project will meet or exceed Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards.
x Water Conservation: The Project will implement the City of Fresno Water Conservation Program, including implementation of the State’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The California Water Conservation Act mandates a 20 percent reduction in water usage by 2020. The City has a reduction target of per capita water usage in the City’s water service area to 230 gpd per capita -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-45
(25 percent below the current consumption rate) in 2035. The City will meet the reduction target with measures applicable to new and existing development. Reductions beyond the state mandated 20 percent are possible with the use of building and landscaping water conservation features. The reductions from buildings can be achieved with high efficiency toilets, low-flow faucets, and water-efficient appliances such as dishwashers. Water savings from landscaping would be achieved primarily through the use of drought-tolerant landscaping or xeriscaping. x Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure: The Project includes a small park within the Fig Garden Financial Center and enhanced pedestrian access to the green space, providing local residents and employees with additional access to open space. The Project also includes pedestrian access to the Fig Garden district from the adjacent residential areas. x Compact and Infill Development: The Project will make use of an existing underutilized space where similar facilities are located and public transit is available. More intense commercial development increases opportunities for walking, bicycling and transit use for some trips, thereby reducing vehicle trips.

The City’s GHG Reduction Plan, Section 6.2.2 – New Discretionary Development requiring a General Plan Amendment (3.) states that projects currently designated for residential or commercial development that increase development densities and intensities and comply with all other relevant General Plan policies and City design standards are considered to have less than significant GHG impacts.

The proposed Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan policies pertaining to greenhouse gases, and implements greenhouse gas reduction features included in the City’s GHG Reduction Plan.

Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant.

Construction emissions
Emissions from construction are temporary in nature. The SJVAPCD has implemented a guidance policy for development projects within their jurisdiction. This policy, “Guidance for Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA,” approved by the Board on December 17, 2009, does not address temporary GHG emissions from construction, nor does this policy establish numeric thresholds for ongoing GHG emissions. Therefore, construction-generated GHGs are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, the Project will not result in any greenhouse gas impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-46
IX. HAZARDS AND

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?

b. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?

c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?

d. Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?

e. For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area?

f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-47
IX. HAZARDS AND

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g. Expose people or structures either directly
or indirectly to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
Hazardous materials refer generally to hazardous substances that exhibit corrosive, poisonous, flammable, and/or reactive properties and have the potential to harm human health and/or the environment. There are no known hazardous material producing facilities in the vicinity of the Project.

The Project is located adjacent to and within the existing Fig Garden Financial Center and is adjacent to residential housing. There are no schools within ¼ mile and the Project site is not within two miles of any airports.

RESPONSES
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of the Project would require the use and transport of hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, and other chemicals (e.g., paints, lead, adhesives, etc.) typically used during construction. It is likely that these hazardous materials and vehicles would be stored by the contractor(s) on-site during construction activities. Improper use and transportation of hazardous materials could result in accidental releases or spil ls, potentially posing health risks to workers, the public, and the environment. However, all materials used during construction would be contained, stored, and handled in compliance with applicab le standards and regulations established by the -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-48
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). In addition, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for the Project (see Mitigation Measure GEO – 1) and shall include emergency procedures for incidental hazardous materials releases. The SWPPP also includes Best Management Practices which includes requirements for hazardous materials storage.

The use of hazardous materials would be confined to the Project construction period. The Project itself, once constructed, will not contain, use or produce any hazardous materials. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. No schools are located within 0.25 mile of the Project site. This condition precludes the possibility of activities associated with the proposed Project exposing schools within a 0.25-mile radius of the Project site to hazardous materials. No impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. A database search was conducted to identify recorded hazardous materials incidents in the Project area. The search included recorded incidents on the National Priorities List (NPL), State Priority List (SPL), the Superfund Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System List (CERLIS), the EPA’s emergency response notification system list (ERNS), and other federal, state, and local agency databases. The Project site was not listed in any of the databases searched. See also Response b. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure HAZ – 1, the Project proponent will be required to prepare a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. Therefore, there the impact will be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-49
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (adopted December 2018), the proposed Project site is within the airport land use plan area for the Fresno Yosemite International Airport, which is located approximately 4 miles southeast of the site.

Fresno Yosemite International Airport is owned an d operated by the City of Fresno. The Airport is approximately five miles northeast of downtown Fresno. The 2017 – 2021 National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems classifies the Airport as a small hub primary facility, and the 2013 California Aviation System Plan (CASP) considers it a primary small hub metropolitan airport. The Airport sits at an elevation of 336 feet above mean sea level. The Airport is a joint use civilian and military facility used by commercial air carriers, air cargo operators, charter operators, the State of California, general aviation, and the United States military. The California National Guard uses a 58-acre portion of the southeastern part of the Airport. The Army National Guard, th e California Division of Forestry, corporate aviation businesses, and two fixed base operators also lease facilities from the Airport.11 According to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan , the proposed Project site is located within the Precision Approach Zone of the Fresno Yosemite Inte rnational Airport. This zone includes the 14 CFR Part 77 Outer Approach Transitional Surface and Prec ision Approach Surface. These Surfaces are used at airports with runways with an existing or pl anned Precision Instrument Approach. The aircraft accident risk level is considered to be low within the Precision Approach Zone.12 The proposed Project is located in an area that has three existing buildings with approximate 60 foot heights. As such, the proposed new 60-foot high office building would not create any new safety hazards to future occupants or airport operations. The Proj ect has been reviewed by the Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission who evaluated all Project comp onents including building height, lighting and glare and approved the Project at their February 2019 meeting. Therefore, the impact is less than impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

11 Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (2018), Appendix D. 12 Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (2018), Page 3-3. -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-50
Less Than Significant Impact. To accommodate the new office building and parking area, the Project will require abandonment of a portion N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Jose Avenue where those streets meet adjacent to the Project site. The intention is to create a cul-de-sac with an adequately sized turn-around pocket just south of the intersection of N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Ramon Avenue and a second cul- de-sac turn-around pocket on W. San Jose Avenue just north of the proposed new parking area. This will eliminate thru-traffic along this route. However, access to the new parking area and the new office building will be provided from W. San Jose Avenue. The turn-around pockets have been adequately sized for emergency vehicles and will provide emergency vehicle access to the site and surrounding area as needed.

The City has consulted with its police, fire and ambulance service providers to determine that the proposed Project provides adequate emergency access to the Project site and surrounding areas. The City will also provide specific construction schedules an d pertinent Project information so that adequate access is maintained at all times. Therefore, the Project will have a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
g. Expose people or structures either directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
No Impact. Implementation of the Project would not change the degree of exposure to wildfires because there are no wildlands in the Project vicinity, thus precluding the possibility of wildfires. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Pr oject will not result in any hazards or hazardous materials impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015. -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-51
X. HYDROLOGY AND

WATER QUALITY
Would the project:

3RWHQWLDOO\
6LJQLILFDQW
,PSDFW
/HVVWKDQ
6LJQLILFDQW
:LWK
0LWLJDWLRQ
,QFRUSRUDWLRQ
/HVVWKDQ
6LJQLILFDQW
,PSDFW 1R,PSDFW
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality?

b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?

i. Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off- site;

ii. substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
offsite;

iii. create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff; or

iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-52
X. HYDROLOGY AND

WATER QUALITY
Would the project:

3RWHQWLDOO\
6LJQLILFDQW
,PSDFW
/HVVWKDQ
6LJQLILFDQW
:LWK
0LWLJDWLRQ
,QFRUSRUDWLRQ
/HVVWKDQ
6LJQLILFDQW
,PSDFW 1R,PSDFW
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?

e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
According to the City’s adopted Urban Water Management Plan (2015), the City’s existing water system consists of about 1,799 miles of transmission and distribution pipelines, 260 active municipal groundwater wells, 224 of which registered flows in the past year, 2 surface water treatment facilities of rated capacities of 2 and 30 mgd, 3 water storage facilities, and 4 booster pump facilities. The distribution system was previously divided into four quasi-pressure zones to help regulate and optimize system pressures as there is an approximate 120 feet of elevation decrease running across the city from the northeast to the southwest.

The City of Fresno will provide water to the office bu ilding, however, the Project will be required to tie into the City’s existing water service infrastructure.

RESPONSES
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project has the potential to impact water quality standards and/or waste discharge requirements during construction (temporary impacts) and operation. Impacts are discussed below.

Construction
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-53
Although the proposed Project site is relatively small in scale, grading, excavation, removal of vegetation cover, and loading activities associated with construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Cons truction activities also could result in soil compaction and wind erosion effects that could adversely affect soils and reduce the revegetation potential at construction sites and staging areas.

Three general sources of potential short-term co nstruction-related stormwater pollution associated with the proposed Project are: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth moving activities which, when not controlled, ma y generate soil erosion and transportation, via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. Generally, routine safety precautions for handling and storing construction materials may effectively mitigate the potential pollution of stormwater by these materials. These same types of common sense, “good housekeeping” procedures can be extended to non-hazardous stormwater pollutants such as sawdust and other solid wastes.

Poorly maintained vehicles and heavy equipment leaking fuel, oil, antifreeze, or other fluids on the construction site are also common sources of stormwater pollution and soil contamination. In addition, grading activities can greatly increase erosion processes. Two general strategies are recommended to prevent construction silt from en tering local storm drains. First, erosion control procedures should be implemented for those areas that must be exposed. Secondly, the area should be secured to control offsite migration of pollutants. These Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be required in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be prepared prior to commencement of Project construction. When pr operly designed and implemented, these “good- housekeeping” practices are expected to reduce short-term construction-related impacts to less than significant.

In accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Program, as discussed in Section 3.5 Geology and Soils the Project will be required to comply with existing regulatory requirements to prepare a SWPPP designed to control erosion and the loss of topsoil to the extent practicable using BMPs that the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has deemed effective in controlling erosion, sedimentation, runoff during construction activities. The specific controls are subject to the review and approval by the RWQCB and are an existing regulatory requirement.

Operation
The proposed office building will result in wastewater from restroom and kitchen facilities that will be discharged into the City’s existing wastewater treatment system. The effluent produced by the -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-54
Project will be typical of other office building s and therefore is not anticipated to produce any discharge that would violate the City’s waste discharge requirements. According to projections used in the City of Fresno Wastewater Collection Syst em Master Plan (2006), wastewater from office buildings is estimated to be approximately 200 gallons per day (GPD) per 1,000 sq. ft. of space. Using this rate, the proposed Project would generate approximately 18,000 gallons per day (GPD) of wastewater (90,000 sq. ft. of office space @ 200 GPD per 1,000 sq. ft.). For purposes of comparison, the previously occupied 44-unit apartment building (since demolished) is estimated to have used approximately 8,157 GPD (assuming 103 GPD/person).

The Fresno-Clovis Regional Water Treatment Facility has a design capacity of 88,000,000 GPD. At 18,000 GPD, the proposed Project would generate a negligible increase in wastewater of less than

0.00002%. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or in terfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project does not propose any wells on the site; the City of Fresno Department of Public Utilities Water Division has determined that no new or expanded water supply facilities are necessary to serve the Project. The Project’s potential impacts related to water supply and groundwater resources (to the extent that groundwater represents the City’s primary source of supply) are more appropriately addressed within the context of the adequacy of existing water supply infrastructure in the Project area. Please see Section XVIII. Utilities and Service Systems. Water service would be provided to the Project by the City of Fresno.

Project demands for groundwater resources in connection with the proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies. The proposed Project is not anticipated to result in additional demands for water resources beyond those considered in the 2015 UWMP. The proposed office building would result in less water demand than anticipated in the 2015 UWMP based on the site’s existing land use designation (residential). The Project would, however, increase demand for water resources beyond existing levels (vacant land). Current on-site water use is primarily associated with exterior landscaping and maintenance requirements. As a result, the Project would potentially affect water resources by increasing on-site water use as compared to current on-site use.

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-55
respect to development of this site. The site is currently designated for residential housing. If the Project area were developed fully with residential uses, the water use would exceed that of the office building. Therefore, the Project’s water demands were effectively considered under the terms of that UWMP. Based on the assumptions in the City’s UWMP, the Project would not negatively impact water supplies or otherwise deplete groundwater su pplies. Moreover, the proposed Project is not anticipated to interfere with groundwater recharge efforts being implemented by the City. The City’s UWMP contains a detailed evaluation of existing so urces of water supply, anticipated future water demand, extensive conservation measures, and the development of new water supplies (recycled water, increased recharge, surface water treatment, etc.). Measures contained in the UWMP as well as the City’s General Plan are intended to reduce demands on groundwater resources by augmenting supply and introducing conservation measures and other mitigation strategies. The proposed Project will implement Mitigation Measure HYD – 1 which includes water use reduction measures.

The proposed Project would not require new or expanded water entitlements and there is sufficient water supply for the Project. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures HYD – 1. See attached Project- specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.

The proposed Project would not substantially deplete groundwater resources such that a significant environmental impact would occur. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite; ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project includes minor changes to the existing stormwater drainage pattern of the area through the installation of asphalt, the office building, parking -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-56
areas, landscaping, curb, gutter and sidewalks. The Project area was previously planned for residential uses rather than for commercial uses. Therefore, as a condition of approval, the Project applicant will be required to mitigate the impacts of increased runoff from the proposed office development and parking area. The Project has been reviewed by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District and conditions and requirements of the Project pertaining to storm drain facilities have been provided to the Project developer. The Project developer will be required to prepare a drainage / grading plan as identified in Mitigation Measure HYD – 2 (preparation of a drainage / grading plan). Therefore, with mitigation, the Project will have a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures HYD – 2. See attached Project- specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.
d. In flood hazard, tsunami or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
No Impact. The Project is not within a regulatory flood way or within a base floodplain (100 year) elevation. In addition, the Project does not include any housing or structures that would be subject to flooding either from a watercourse or from dam inunda tion. There are no bodies of water near the site that would create a potential risk of hazards from seiche, tsunami or mudflow. The Project will not conflict with any water quality control plans or sustainable groundwater management plan. Therefore, there are no impacts.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any hydrologic impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-57
XI. LAND USE AND

PLANNING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Physically divide an established
community?

b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
The Project site is located within the Bullard Community Planning area in the City of Fresno, California.

The Project site is situated near the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Shaw Avenue, and is bounded by N. Palm Avenue to the west, W. San Ramon Avenue, N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Jose Avenue to the north, the Fig Garden Village shopping center to the southwest, and single- and multi-family residential development to the north, south, and east.

RESPONSES
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The site is located at the existing Fig Garden Financial Center adjacent to Fig Garden Village in a rela tively busy mixed-use area including shopping, services and housing in central Fresno. The immediate vicinity is comprised of large office buildings, parking areas and residential housing. To the north and east of the proposed office building is residential housing while existing office buildings are located to the south and west. The proposed new parking area is surrounded by residential housing to the north and south, a vacant lot to the east, and an office building to the west. The area is highly disturbed with urban uses.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-58
Zoning
APN 417-140-21 is zoned RS-5/EQ (Residential Single-Family / Equine Overlay) APN 417-231-16 is zoned RMX (Regional Mixed-Use)
APN 417-140-26 is zoned RMX/cz (Regional Mixed-Use / Conditions of Zoning) APN 417-231-19 is zoned RMX/cz (Regional Mixed-Use / Conditions of Zoning) The Project has no characteristics that would physically divide the City of Fresno. Although a portion of a thru-street will be abandoned, the result would not physically divide an established community, as access to the existing residential and commercial establishments will remain.

The proposed Project would conflict with the curre nt zoning and planned land use for the site. As such, the Project is pursuing a zone change and planned land use change. The proposed Mitigation Measure LU -1 (requirement to obtain appropri ate entitlements) will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. With the approved zoning and land use changes, the proposed Project will be consistent with the following land use policies:

Fresno General Plan
The Fresno General Plan designates the subject site as planned land use Residential Medium Density. Plan Amendment/Rezone Application No. P18-3659 proposes to amend the Fresno General Plan and Bullard Community Plan planned land use from Residential Medium Density to Regional Mixed Use. The proposed Project is compatible with goals, objectives, and policies included in the Fresno General Plan, including:
x Goal No. 1 of the Fresno General Plan encourages the use of urban form, land use, and Development Code policies to streamline permit approval, promote local educational excellence and workforce relevance, significantly increase business development and expansion, retain and attract talented people, create jobs and sustained economic growth, strategically locate employment lands and facilities, and avoid over-saturation of a single type of housing, retail or employment.
x Goal No. 7 of the Fresno General Plan encourages the provision for a diversity of districts, neighborhoods, housing types (including affordable housing), residential densities, job opportunities, recreation, open space, and educational venues that appeal to a broad range of people throughout the city.
x Goal No. 8 of the Fresno General Plan encourages the development of Complete Neighborhoods and districts with an efficient and diverse mix of residential densities, -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-59
building types, and affordability which are de signed to be healthy, attractive, and centered by schools, parks, and public and commercial services to provide a sense of place and that provide as many services as possible within walking distance. x Goal No. 12 of the Fresno General Plan encourages the resolution of existing public infrastructure and service deficiencies, full use of existing infrastructure, and investment in improvements to increase competitiveness and promote economic growth.
x Implementing Policies LU-1-a and LU-2-a of the Fresno General Plan promote development of vacant, underdeveloped, and re-developable land within the within the Existing City Limits as of December 31, 2012 where urban services are available. x Objective LU-6 of the Fresno General Plan promotes the retention and enhancement of existing commercial areas to strengthen Fresno’s economic base and development of new office, retail, and lodging use districts on sites which will serve neighborhoods and regional visitors.
x Fresno General Plan Policy LU-6-a fosters high quality design, diversity, and a mix of amenities in new development with uses through the consideration of guidelines, regulations and design review procedures.

Plan Amendment/Rezone Application No. P18-3659, as the initial step in the future development of an approximately 90,000-square-foot, 4-story expansion of office uses at The Fig Garden Financial Center, would aid in the accommodation of sustained economic growth and the expansion of employment in an area with surrounding residential and retail uses, avoiding over-saturation of a single type of housing, retail or employment in the area.

The applicant has also been working with local residents on the concept of a park within the Fig Garden Financial Center and enhanced pedestrian access to the complex’s green space, providing local residents and employees with additional access to open space.

As an expansion of an existing use in a developed urban area, the future Project would make use of existing public infrastructure and services. The proposed development would be evaluated at the time of the development permit application submittal to determine possible impacts to public infrastructure and services. At that time, the proposed development may be required to construct or contribute to infrastructure and/or service improvements.

Bullard Community Plan
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-60
Upon reviewing the policies contained in the Plan, staff has determined that there are no policies that are more restrictive than those contained in the FMC. The proposed Project is compatible with goals and policies included in the Bullard Community Plan, including:
x Goal 4.2.3-5 promotes office land use designations of a size, configuration, location and visibility that would be attractive to prospective office users. x Policy 4.2.4-4 indicates that commercial areas shall be designed such that commercial traffic will not route through local residential streets. x Policy 4.2.4-7-d indicates that no commercial or office building shall be constructed within fifty-feet of the property line of abutting properties zoned or planned for residential uses.

The proposed Project prepares the subject properties for an expansion of the existing office use at Fig Garden Financial Center with a concept that inhibits commercial traffic passing through local residential streets. The future location of the new office building, while not yet part of an official application, conceptually places the bu ilding at a greater distance from existing residential uses than attempting to place an office building on the northeast corner of North Colonial and West San Jose Avenues directly abutting single-family residences. See Exhibit I for the conceptual site plan.

Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
On December 3, 2018, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) adopted the Fresno County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The proposed Project is within the Airport Influence Area of Fresno Yosemite International Airport and must be reviewed by the ALUC. The subject site is located in the Precision Approach Zone, where the Safety Criteria Matrix for the Plan indicates no limit on Project density but does require Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 7460 review to determine that development will not exceed the airport’s airspace protection surface. As the Project does not include a de velopment permit application with building elevations at this time, the FAA review will not be required for the ALUC to review the proposed plan amendment/rezone application. It should be noted that Fig Garden Financial Center already has existing buildings of the same mass and height as the future office building concept.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures LU - 1. See attached Project-specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-61
XII. MINERAL

RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state?

b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?

RESPONSES
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mine ral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. There are no known mineral resources in the Project area and none are identified in the City’s General Plan near the Project site. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any mineral resource impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-62
XIII. NOISE
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?

b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?

c. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
projec
t expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise
levels?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
Noise is most often described as unwanted sound. Although sound can be easily measured, the perception of noise and the physical response to sound complicate the analysis of its impact on people.

The City of Fresno is impacted by a multitude of noise sources. Mobile sources of noise, especially cars and trucks, are the most common and significant sources of noise in most communities, and they are predominant sources of noise in the City. In addition, commercial, industrial, and institutional land uses throughout the City (i.e., schools, fire stations, utilities) generate stationary-source noise. The Project is located in an intensively developed commercial/office area, but is adjacent to residential housing. The predominant noise sources in the Project area inc lude traffic on local roadways and typical noise associated with shopping centers such as Fig Garden Village and residential noise (lawn mowers, audio equipment, voices, etc.). Sensitive receptors in the area include the residential housing adjacent to the Project areas.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-63

RESPONSES
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact.

Short-term (Construction) Noise Impacts
Proposed Project construction related activities will involve temporary noise sources and are anticipated to begin in 2019 through 2020. Typical construction related equipment include graders, trenchers, small tractors and excavators. During the proposed Project construction, noise from construction related activities will contribute to the noise environment in the immediate vicinity. Activities involved in construction will generate maximum noise levels, as indicated in Table 5, ranging from 79 to 91 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, without feasible noise control (e.g., mufflers) and ranging from 75 to 80 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, with feasible noise controls.

Table 5
Typical Construction Noise Levels
Type of Equipment dBA at 50 ft
Without Feasible Noise Control With Feasible Noise Control Dozer or Tractor 80 75
Excavator 88 80
Scraper 88 80
Front End Loader 79 75
Backhoe 85 75
Grader 85 75
Truck 91 75

The distinction between short-term construction noise impacts and long-term operational noise impacts is a typical one in both CEQA documents and loc al noise ordinances, which generally recognize the reality that short-term noise from construction is inevitable and cannot be mitigated beyond a certain level. Thus, local agencies frequently tolerate short-term noise at levels that they would not accept for permanent noise sources. A more severe approach would be impractical and might preclude the kind of construction activities that are to be expected from time to time in urban environments. Most residents of urban areas recognize this reality and expect to hear construction activities on occasion. -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-64
In addition, construction activities would not occur between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM, Monday through Saturday, in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 10-109, which limits work hours “to between the hours of 7 AM and 10 PM on any day except Sunday.” Further restrictions on construction noise may be placed on the Project as determined through the Conditional Use permit process.

Long-term (Operational) Noise Impacts
The primary source of on-going noise from the Project will be from vehicles traveling to and from the site. The Project will result in an increase in traffic on some roadways in the Project area. However, the relatively low number of new trips associated with the Project is not likely to increase the ambient noise levels by a significant amount. Policy H-1-b of the City’s Noise Element addresses significant Project- related increases in ambient noise levels for evaluation of noise impacts. A significant increase is assumed to occur if a project causes the ambient noise level to increase by the following amounts:

Where ambient noise levels are <60 dB : an increase of 5 dB or more Where ambient noise levels are 60-65 dB: an increase of 3 dB or more Where ambient noise levels are >65 dB : an increase of 1.5 dB or more Given the relatively large amount of existing vehicular activity in the Project area, the small increase in traffic associated with the new office building (less than 1,000 daily trips), is not expected to increase ambient noise levels by more than 1 dB. The area is highly active with vehicles, commercial establishments and other noise generating sources and the proposed Project will not introduce a new source of noise that isn’t already occurring in the area. Other operational noise generation from air conditioning systems or other mechanical equipment will be similar to the other offices in the area and will be shielded to dampen the noise impacts. Therefore, the impact is considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The Project is located within an airport land use plan but is located well outside the CNEL contours. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-65
In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any noise impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-66
XIV. POPULATION AND

HOUSING
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?

b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
The Project consists of the construction and operation of a professional office building. There is no new housing associated with the Project, however a 44-unit apartment building previously occupied a portion of the site (since demolished).

RESPONSES
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Less Than Significant Impact. There are no new homes associated with the proposed Project. The relatively minor amount of new employment opportunities that would be created by the proposed Project could be readily filled by the existing employment base, given the City’s existing unemployment rates. The proposed Project will not affect any regional population, housing, or employment projections anticipated by City policy documents. There is a less than significant impact.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-67
Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any population or housing impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-68
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:

Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
The site is located at the existing Fig Garden Financial Center adjacent to Fig Garden Village in a relatively busy mixed-use area including shopping, services and housing in central Fresno. The immediate vicinity is comprised of large office buildings, parking areas and residential housing. The area is served by City of Fresno Police, Fire, the Fresno Unified School District and other public facilities.

RESPONSES
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-69
Fire protection?
Police Protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?

Less Than Significant Impact. Police protection services would be provided to the Project site from the existing Northwest District Station, which is situated on 3781 N. Hughes Ave, approximately three miles from the Project site. The Project is located within the Northwest District. The Project site is located in an area currently served by the Police Department; the Department would not need to expand its existing service area or construct a new facility to serve the Project site.

According to the City of Fresno Fire Department, the proposed Project would be served by Station 11, which is located at 5544 North Fresno, approximately 0.5 miles from the Project site. Project development would result in an incremental increase in demand for fire protection services due to the introduction of a new commercial office building within the Project area. According to the Fire Department, response times to the Project site would be within the Departme nt’s stated goal of four minutes. As a result, the Project would not adversely impact the Department’s ability to provide fire protection services within the Project area or adversely impact target response times such that additional facilities would need to be constructed.

The proposed Project, as a condition of approval, will be required to comply with all applicable fire and building safety codes (California Building Code and Uniform Fire Code) to ensure adequate fire safety elements are incorporated into final Project design, including the providing minimum turning radii for fire equipment. Proposed driveways will be required to provide appropriate widths and turning radii to safely accommodate emergency response and the tran sport of emergency/public safety vehicles. The Project will also be designed to meet Fire Department requirements regarding fire flow, water storage requirements, hydrant spacing, infrastructure sizing, and emergency access. As a result, appropriate fire safety considerations will be included as part of the final design of the Project. Based on the above analysis, the proposed Project would not impact the Department’s ability to provide fire protection services within the Project area.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-70
The Project does not include any housing and thus wo uld not impact any school facilities. In addition, the Project includes a small park area that will be open to the public, the environmental impacts of which are addressed in this document.

The Project has no design, construction or operational characteristics that would necessitate the need for new or expanded facilities related to fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities. There is no housing related or population inducing component of the Project. The Project applicant will be required to pay standard development impact fees for the public services described herein as determined by the City of Fresno. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any public services impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-71
XVI. RECREATION
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?

b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreat
ional facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
There are no parks or recreational facilities in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. However, the Project includes construction of a small park area that will be open to the public.

RESPONSES
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The Project has no design, construction or operational characteristics that would necessitate the need for new or expanded facilities related to recreational facilities. There is no housing related or population inducing component of the Project. However, the Project is likely to improve park/recreational facilities by constructing a small park to be located north of the new parking area adjacent to W. San Jose Avenue. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any recreation impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-72
XVII. TRANSPORTATION/

TRAFFIC
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?

b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?

c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?

d. Result in inadequate emergency access?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
The Project site is located near the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Shaw Avenue, and is bounded by N. Palm Avenue and the Fig Garden Financial Center to the west, W. San Ramon Avenue, N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Jose Avenue to the north, the Fig Garden Village shopping center to the south, and single- and multi-family residential development to the north, south, and east.

A Trip Generation Analysis for the Project was prep ared by Precision Civil Engineering (See Appendix B).

RESPONSES
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or poli cy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-73
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less Than Significant Impact. To accommodate the new office building and parking area, the Project will require abandonment of a portion N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Jose Avenue where those streets meet adjacent to the Project site. The intention is to create a “dead-end” cul-de-sac with an adequately sized turn-around pocket just south of the intersection of N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Ramon Avenue and a second cul-de-sac turn-around pocket on W. San Jose Avenue just north of the proposed new parking area. This will eliminate thru-traffic along th is route. However, access to the Project will be provided from W. San Jose Avenue. The turn-around pockets have been adequately sized for emergency vehicles and will provide emergency vehicle access to the site and surrounding area as needed.

The “Mobility and Transportation” element of the City of Fresno General Plan 2035 breaks down the City of Fresno into four Traffic Impact Zones (TIZ’s) on General Plan Figure MT-4. The Project lies within TIX- II, which represents areas of the City that are most ly developed and built ou t. To enco urage infill development and minimize upfront infrastructure cost, the peak hour Level of Service (LOS) shall be maintained at LOS E or better for all intersections and roadway segments. The trigger for requiring a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for all development within the TIZ-II is when a Project is anticipated to generate 200 or more new peak hour trips. As identi fied below, the Project will result in less than 200 peak hour trips and thus a full TIS is not warranted.

Trip Generation Analysis
Project trip generation was developed assuming approximately 90,000 square feet of usable office space would be available. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation (Ninth Edition), the Project will generate approximately 993 daily trips and is anticipated to have 141 AM peak hour trips and 134 PM peak hour trips (See Table 6 below).

Table 6
Proposed Project Trip Generation
Project
Component Total Daily Trips AM Peak
Hour In
AM Peak
Hour Out
PM Peak
Hour In
PM Peak
Hour Out
General Office
ITE Code 710 993 124 17 23 111
Total: 141 Total: 134

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-74
With the proposed abandonment and restricted access to the existing local roads, the proposed trips will gain access to the Project site through the existing commercial and office developments to the west. San Jose Avenue and Palm Avenue will be the main access point. According to the Trip Generation Analysis, the intersections of Palm/Shaw, Palm/San Jose and Palm/Barstow, are all signalized. The City should continue to monitor these intersections and adjust signal timing as needed to improve the level of service.

The City of Fresno Public Works Department, Traffic and Engineering Services Division determined that the Project does not represent a significant change in traffic beyond existing levels generated by the current office uses in the Fig Garden Financial Center.

The Project will not conflict with plans or policies pertaining to transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Nor is the Project inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 subdivision (b). The Project is located in an area served by transit and is proximate to other destinations such as restaurants and shopping opportunities in the Fig Garden Village located adjacent to the Project. The Project includes the addition of pedestrian facilities (walkways, side walks, curbs and ADA facilities), as well as bicycle storage accommodations. Implementation of the Project will be beneficial to such facilities. The Project is consistent with the following General Plan policies pertaining to public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities:

Policy UF-12-b: Activity Centers. Mixed-use designated areas along BRT and/or transit corridors are appropriate for more intensive concentratio ns of urban uses. Typical uses could include commercial areas; employment centers; schools; compact residential development; religious institutions; parks; and other gathering points where residents may interact, work, and obtain goods and services in the same place.

Policy RC-2-a Link Land Use to Transportation. Promote mixed-use, higher density infill development in multi-modal corridors. Support la nd use patterns that make more efficient use of the transportation system and plan future transportation investments in areas of higher- intensity development. Discourage investment in infrastructure that would not meet these criteria.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-75
The City of Fresno also prepared an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) in 2016, which envisions a complete, safe and comfortable network of trails, sidewalks and bikeways that serves all residents of Fresno. While there are no established trails associated with the site, as previously mentioned, the Project will provide pedestrian access from adjacent reside ntial neighborhoods, will provide bicycle storage facilities and will not otherwise conflict with any policies or programs included in the ATP.

In order to ensure that impacts remain less than significant , Mitigation Measures TRA – 1 (provide pedestrian connectivity to adjacent residents), TR A – 2 (provide bicycle storage), TRA – 3 (maintain emergency vehicle access), and TRA – 4 (payment of transportation impact fees) have been included.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures TRA – 1, TRA – 2, TRA – 3, and TRA - 4. See attached Project-specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.

It is also recommended that the City continue to monitor the intersections of Palm/Shaw, Palm/San Jose and Palm/Barstow and adjust signal timing to improve the intersection level of services.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any transportation impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-76
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL

RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American
tribe, and that is:

i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or

ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native
American tribe.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-77

RESPONSES
a). Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less Than Significant Impact In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18, potentially affected Tribes were formally notified of this Project and were given the opportunity to request consultation on the Project. The City contacted the Native American Heritage Commission, requesting a contact list of applicable Native American Tribes, which was provided to the City. The City provided letters to the listed Tribes, notifying them of the Project and requesting consultation, if desired. A total of ten Tribes were contacted of which four (4) indicated they had no comment, and the remaining six (6) did not respond to the invitation to comment and consult. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-78
XIX. UTILITIES AND

SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?

b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?

c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s
projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?

d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?

e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-79

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
The City of Fresno provides water, sewer, storm drain and solid waste services. The Project will be responsible for constructing infrastructure to tie into these services.

RESPONSES
a. Require or result in the relocation or construc tion of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project includes minor changes to the existing stormwater drainage pattern of the area through the installation of asphalt, the office building, parking areas, landscaping, curb, gutter and sidewalks. The Project area was previously planned for residential uses rather than for commercial uses. Therefore, as a condition of approval, the Project applicant will be required to mitigate the impacts of increased runoff from the proposed office development and parking area. The Project has been reviewed by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District and conditions and requirements of the Project pertaining to storm drain facilities have been provided to the Project developer. The Project developer will be required to prepare a drainage / grading plan as identified in Mitigation Measure HYD – 2 (preparation of a drainage / grading plan). Therefore, with mitigation, the Project will have a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures HYD – 2. See attached Project- specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Water service would be provided to the Project by the City of Fresno and the City of Fresno Department of Public Utilities Water Division has determined that no new or expanded water supply facilities are necessary to serve the Project.

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-80
and maintenance requirements. As a result, the Project would potentially affect water resources by increasing on-site water use as compared to current on-site use.

While the Project would increase demand for water resources beyond current levels, the Project would utilize less water than the water demand projecti ons contained in the 2015 UWMP with respect to development of this site. The site is currently designated for residential housing. If the Project area were developed fully with residential uses, the water use would exceed that of the office building. Therefore, the Project’s water demands were effectively considered under the terms of that UWMP. Based on the assumptions in the City’s UWMP, the Project would not negatively impact water supplies or otherwise deplete groundwater supplies. Moreover, the proposed Project is not anticipated to interfere with groundwater recharge efforts being implemented by the City. The City’s UWMP contains a detailed evaluation of existing sources of water supply, anticipated future water demand, extensive conservation measures, and the development of new water supplies (recycled water, increased recharge, surface water treatment, etc.). Measures contained in the UWMP as well as the City’s General Plan are intended to reduce demands on groundwater resources by augmenting supply and introducing conservation measures and other mitigation strategies. The proposed Project will implement Mitigation Measure HYD – 1 which includes water use reduction measures.

The proposed Project would not require new or expanded water entitlements and there is sufficient water supply for the Project. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: Project-specific Mitigation Measures HYD – 1. See attached Project- specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring Checklist.
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed office building will result in wastewater from restroom and kitchen facilities that will be discharged into the City’s existing wastewater treatment system. The effluent produced by the Project will be typical of other office buildings and therefore is not anticipated to produce any discharge that would violate the City’s waste discharge requirements. The City of Fresno Public Works Department has reviewed the Project and has determined that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project. For more information, please refer to the Hydrology section of this Chapter.

Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-81
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project will be served by the City of Fresno Department of Public Utilities (Trash Disposal and Recycling) who has review ed the Project. The location will be serviced by Allied Waste and will require a 2-cell trash enclosur e with adequate access for trash pickup vehicles.

Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

In conclusion, with mitigation incorporated, the Project will not result in any utility or service system impacts beyond those analyzed in MEIR SCH No. 2012111015.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-82
XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, w ould the
project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?

b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?

d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?

AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
Although the City of Fresno is proximate to high and very high fire hazard designated areas, the City itself is largely categorized as little or no threat or moderate fire hazard, which is largely attributed to paved areas.13 Some small areas along the San Joaquin River Bluff in the northern portion of the City of

13 City of Fresno. General Plan and Development Code Update. Master Environmental Impact Report. Page 5.13-4. https://www.fresno.gov/darm/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2016/11/Sec-05-13-Public-Services-Fresno-MEIR.pdf. Accessed January 2019. -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-83
Fresno are prone to wildfire due to the relatively steep terrain and vegetation and are classified as having a high fire hazard. The City does have an adopted Emergency Operations Plan (EOP); however, the EOP does not designate evacuation routes, which may not be necessary since Fresno does not face any expected natural hazards from likely sources or locations. 14 The proposed Project site is relatively flat at an elevation of 320 feet above mean sea level in an area of intense urban uses. It is located near the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Shaw Avenue, and is bounded by N. Palm Avenue and the Fig Garden Financial Center to the west, W. San Ramon Avenue, N. Colonial Avenue and W. San Jose Avenue to the north, the Fig Garden Village shopping center to the south, and single- and multi-family residential development to the north, south, and east.

RESPONSES
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associat ed infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is located in the center of a highly urbanized area (buildings, roads, ect.) which precludes the risk of wildfire. The area is flat in nature which would limit the risk of downslope flooding and landslides, and limit any wildfire spread.

To receive building permits, the proposed Project would be required to be in compliance with the adopted emergency response plan. As such, any wildfire risk to the Project structures or people would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

14 City of Fresno General Plan. December 2014. Page 9-36. https://www.fresno.gov/darm/wp- content/uploads/sites/10/2016/11/GP9NoiseandSafety.pdf. Accessed January 2019 -#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-84
XXI. MANDATORY

FINDINGS OF

SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or
restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory?

c. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-85

RESPONSES
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the proposed Project is not expected to have substantial impact on the environment or on any resources identified in the Initial Study. Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the Project to reduce all potentially significant impacts to less than significant.

b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Less than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects. Due to the nature of the Project and consistency with environmental policies, incremental contributions to impacts are considered less than cumulatively considerable. All Project- related impacts were determined to be either less than significant, or less than significant after mitigation.

The proposed Project would not contribute substantially to adverse cumulative conditions, or create any substantial indirect impacts (i.e., increase in population could lead to an increase need for housing, increase in traffic, air pollutants, etc.). Due to extensive buildout of the area and existing land constraints, it is not anticipated that further substantial commercial or residential development will occur in the area.

As such, Project impacts are not considered to be cumulatively considerable given the lack of proposed new development in the area and the insignificance of Project-induced impacts. The impact is therefore less than significant.

c. Does the project have environmental effects whic h will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 3
CITY OF FRESNO | Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 3-86
Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the Project is not expected to have substantial impact on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the Project to reduce all potentially significant impacts to less than significant.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Chapter 4

MITIGATION MONITORING
& REPORTING PROGRAM
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Project Specific Mitigation Measure Monitoring
Checklist

This Project Specific Mitigation Monitoring Checklist has been formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for Environmental Assessment No. P18-03659. These Project Specific Mitigation Measures are in addition to the applicable mitigation measures from the City of Fresno MEIR.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
Geology/Soils
Mitigation Measure GEO – 1 In order to reduce on-site erosion due to project construction and operat ion, an erosion control plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pl an (SWPPP) shall be prepared for the site preparation, construction, and post- construction periods by a registered civil engineer or certified professiona l. The erosion control plan shall incorporate best management practices consistent with the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The erosion component of the plan must at least meet the requirements of the SWPPP requ ired by the California State Water Resources Control Board. If earth disturbing activities are proposed between October 15 and April 15, these activities shall be limited to the extent feasible to minimize potential erosion related impacts.

Additional eros ion control measures shall be implemented in consultation with the City of Fresno. Prior to the issuance of any permit, the project proponent shall submit de tailed plans to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno. The componen ts of the erosion control plan and SWPPP shall be monitored for effectiveness by City of Fresno. Erosion control measures may include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Limit disturbance of soils and vegetation disturbance removal to the minimum area necessary for access and
construction;
b. Confine all vehicular traffic associated with construction to the right-of-way of designated access roads;
c. Adhere to construction schedules designed to avoid
periods of heavy precipitation or high winds;
d. Ensure that all exposed soil is provid ed with temporary drainage and soil protection when construction activity is shut down during the winter periods; and
e. Inform construction personnel prior to construction and periodically during construction activities of environmental concerns, pertinent l aws and regulations, and elements of the proposed erosion control measures.

Project
Applicant
Prior to
issuance
of
grading
permits
City of
Fresno
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
Mitigation Measure GEO – 2 The project proponent shall retain a registered geotechnical engineer to prepare a design level geotechnical analysis prior to the issuance of any grading and/or building permit. The design- level analysis shall address site preparation measures and foundation design requirements of the project. The design-level analysis shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno. Final design-level p roject plans shall be designed in accordance with the approved geotechnical analysis. This shall include certification of engineered fills and subgrade preparation through monitoring of earthwork and compaction testing by a geotechnical engineer during construction.

Hydrology
Mitigation Measure HYD – 1 The project proponent shall retain a qualified consultant to prepare a dr ainage / grading plan prior to the issuance of any grading and/or building permit. The design- level analysis shall be prepared to the sati sfaction of the City of Fresno. The developer may either make improvements to the existing pipeline system to provide additional capacity or may use some type of permanent peak reducing facility in order to eliminate adverse impacts on the existing storm drain system.

Mitigation Measure HYD - 2 The Project will implement the City of Fresno Water Conservation Program, including implementation of the State’s Water Efficien t Landscape Ordinance. The California Water Conservation Act mandates a 20 percent reduction in water usage by 2020. The City will m eet the reduction target with measures applicable to new and existing development. Reductions beyond the state mandated 20 percent are possible with the use of building and landscaping water conservation features. The reductions from buildings can be achieved with high efficiency toilets, low -flow faucets, Project
Applicant
Prior to
issuance
of
building
permits
City of
Fresno
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
and water -efficient appliances such as dishwashers. Water savings from landscaping would be achieved primarily through the use of drought-tolerant landscaping or xeriscaping.

Land Use
Mitigation Measure LU – 1 As a condition of approval, the project developer will be required to obtain the following entitlements:
General Plan Amendment for 417-140-21 from
planned land use from RM (Residential Medium
Density) to RMX (Regional Mixed-Use);
Rezone Application for 417-140-21 from RS-5 / EQ
(Residential Single-Family / Equine Overlay) zone
district to the RMX (Regional Mixed Use) zone
district;
Rezone Application to Modify Conditions of
Zoning for 417-231-19 and 417-140-26 to remove
previously established conditions of zoning.

Project
Applicant /
City of Fresno
Condition
of
Approval
City of
Fresno
Traffic
Mitigation Measure TRA – 1 Provide pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent commercial shopping center and the existing residential developments to the west and north.

Mitigation Measure TRA – 2 Provide bicycle storage facilities on - site to encourage use of pedestrian, bicycle and transit m odes for accessing the project site.

Mitigation Measure TRA – 3 Access to San Jose Avenue and N.

Project
Applicant
Prior to
issuance
of
building
permits
City of
Fresno
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Mitigation Measure
Party
responsible for
Implementing
Mitigation
Timing
Party
responsible
for
Monitoring
Verification
(name/date)
Colonial Avenue should be restricted to emergency access only.

Mitigation Measure TRA – 4 The project shall pay into applicable transportation fee programs. These include a Fresno Major Street Impact Fee (FMSI), a Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee (TSMI) and a Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF). The FMSI Fee will be calculated and assessed during the building permit process. The RTMF will be calculated and assessed by Fresno COG.
-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50LWLJDWLRQ0HDVXUH0RQLWRULQJ&KHFNOLVWIRU(QYLURQPHQWDO$VVHVVPHQW 1R3
IRUWKH)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO2IILFH&RPSOH[3URMHFW
0D\

,1&25325$7,1*0($685(6)5207+(0$67(5(19,5210(17$/,03$&75(3257 0(,5
&(57,),(')25
7+(&,7<2))5(612*(1(5$/3/$183'$7(
6&+1R

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW
%0LWLJDWHG
&0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URJUHVV
'5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG
(3DUWRI&LW\ZLGH3URJUDP
)1RW$SSOLFDEOH

7KHWLPLQJRILPSOHPHQWLQJHDFKPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHLVLGHQWLILH GLQLQWKHFKHFNOLVWDVZHOODVLGHQWLILHVWKHHQWLW\UHVSRQV LEOHIRU YHULI\LQJ WKDW WKH PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV DSSOLHG WR D SURMHFW DUH SHUIRUPHG 3URMHFW DSSOLFDQWV DUH UHVSRQVLEOH IRU SURYLGLQJ HYLGHQFHWKDWPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVDUHLPSOHPHQWHG$VOHDGDJHQF\WKH&LW\RI)UHVQRLVUHVSRQVLEOHIRUYHULI\LQJWKDWPLWLJ DWLRQ LVSHUIRUPHGFRPSOHWHG
3 D J H

7KLV PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUH PRQLWRULQJ DQG UHSRUWLQJ FKHFNOLVW ZDV SUHSDUHG SXUVXDQW WR &DOLIRUQLD (QYLURQPHQWDO 4XDOLW\ $FW
& (4$
*XLGHOLQHV 6HFWLRQ
DQG 6HFWLRQ
RIWKH3XEOLF5HVRXUFHV&RGH
35&
,WZDVFHUWLILHGDV SDUWRI WKH)UHVQR&LW\
&RXQFLO¶VDSSURYDORIWKH 0(,5IRUWKH)UHVQR*HQHUDO3ODQ XSGDWH )UHVQR&LW\&RXQFLO
5HVROXWLRQDGRSWHG'HFHPEHU

/HWWHUGHVLJQDWLRQVWRWKHULJKWRIHDFK0(,5PLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHOLVWHGLQWKLV([K LELWQRWH KRZWKHPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHUHODWHVWRWKHHQYLURQPHQWDODVVHVVPHQW RIWKHDERYH OLVWHG SURMHFWDFFRUGLQJWRWKHNH\IRXQGDWULJKWDQGDWWKHERWWRPVRIWKHIROORZLQJSDJHV

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%<
$ % & ' ( )
$HVWKHWLFV

$(6 /LJKWLQJ V\VWHPV IRU VWUHHW DQG SDUNLQJ DUHDV VKDOO LQFOXGH VKLHOGV WR GLUHFW OLJKW WR WKH URDGZD\ VXUIDFHV DQG SDUNLQJDUHDV9HUWLFDOVKLHOGVRQWKHOLJKWIL[WXUHVVKDOODO VREH XVHGWRGLUHFWOLJKWDZD\IURPDGMDFHQWOLJKWVHQVLWLYHODQGXV HV VXFKDVUHVLGHQFHV

9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWRLVVXDQFH
RIEXLOGLQJ

SHUPLWV
3XEOLF:RUNV
'HSDUWPHQW

3:
DQG

'HYHORSPHQW
5HVRXUFH
0DQDJHPHQW
'HSW

'$50

; ;

-#20)',,3%*-.%

SHUPLWV

'$50 X X

$(6
/LJKWLQJ V\VWHPV IRU IUHHVWDQGLQJ VLJQV VKDOO QRW H[FHHG IRRW /DPEHUWV
)7 /
ZKHQ DGMDFHQW WR VWUHHWV
ZKLFK KDYH DQ DYHUDJH OLJKW LQWHQVLW\ RI OHVV WKDQ KRUL]RQWDO IRRWFDQGOHV DQG VKDOO QRW H[FHHG )7 / ZKHQ
DGMDFHQWWRVWUHHWVZKLFKKDYHDQDYHUDJHOLJKWLQWHQVLW\RI KRUL]RQWDOIRRWFDQGOHVRUJUHDWHU
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWRLVVXDQFH
RIEXLOGLQJ

SHUPLWV

'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

/RFDWH ORDGLQJ GRFNV DQG WUXFN DFFHVV URXWHV DV IDU IURP VHQVLWLYH UHFHSWRUV DV UHDVRQDEO\ SRVVLEOH FRQVLGHULQJ VLWH GHVLJQOLPLWDWLRQVWRFRPSO\ZLWKRWKHU&LW\GHVLJQVWDQGDUGV 3RVWVLJQVUHTXLULQJGULYHUVWROLPLWLGOLQJWRPLQXWHVRUOHVV 9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO

'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
$LU4XDOLW\(continued)

$,5
3URMHFWVWKDWUHVXOWLQDQLQFUHDVHGFDQFHUULVNRILQ D PLOOLRQ RU H[FHHG FULWHULD SROOXWDQW DPELHQW DLU TXDOLW\ VWDQGDUGV VKDOO LPSOHPHQW VLWHVSHFLILF PHDVXUHV WKDW UHGXFH WR[LFDLUFRQWDPLQDQW
7$&
H[SRVXUHWRUHGXFHH[FHVVFDQFHU
ULVN WR OHVV WKDQ LQ D PLOOLRQ 3RVVLEOH FRQWURO PHDVXUHV LQFOXGHEXWDUHQRWOLPLWHGWR

/RFDWH ORDGLQJ GRFNV DQG WUXFN DFFHVV URXWHV DV IDU IURP VHQVLWLYH UHFHSWRUV DV UHDVRQDEO\ SRVVLEOH FRQVLGHULQJ VLWH GHVLJQOLPLWDWLRQVWRFRPSO\ZLWKRWKHU&LW\GHVLJQVWDQGDUGV 3RVWVLJQVUHTXLULQJGULYHUVWROLPLWLGOLQJWRPLQXWHVRUOHVV &RQVWUXFWEORFNZDOOVWRUHGXFHWKHIORZRIHPLVVLRQVWRZDUG VHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUV
,QVWDOO D YHJHWDWLYH EDUULHU GRZQZLQG IURP WKH 7$& VRXUFH WKDWFDQDEVRUEDSRUWLRQRIWKHGLHVHO30HPLVVLRQV
)RU SURMHFWV SURSRVLQJ WR ORFDWH D QHZ EXLOGLQJ FRQWDLQLQJ VHQVLWLYHUHFHSWRUVQHDUH[LVWLQJVRXUFHVRI7$&HPLVVLRQV LQVWDOO+(3$ILOWHUVLQ+9$&V\VWHPVWRUHGXFH7$&HPLVVLRQ OHYHOVH[FHHGLQJULVNWKUHVKROGV
,QVWDOO K HDWLQJ DQG FRROLQJ VHUYLFHV DW WUXFN VWRSV WR HOLPLQDWH WKH QHHG IRU LGOLQJ GXULQJ RYHUQLJKW VWRSV WR UXQ RQERDUGV\VWHPV
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

6-9$3&'

9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

$,5
5HTXLUH GHYHORSHUV RI SURMHFWV ZLWK WKH SRWHQWLDO WR JHQHUDWH VLJQLI LFDQW RGRU LPSDFWV DV GHWHUPLQHG WKURXJK UHYLHZRI6-9$3&'RGRUFRPSODLQWKLVWRU\IRUVLPLODUIDFLOLWLHV DQG FRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWK WKH 6-9$3&' WR SUHSDUH DQ RGRU LPSDFW DVVHVVPHQW DQG WR LPSOHPHQW RGRU FRQWURO PHDVXUHV UHFRPPHQGHG E\ WKH 6-9$3&' R
U WKH &LW\ WR WKH H[WHQW
QHHGHGWRUHGXFHWKHLPSDFWWROHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV

%,2
&RQVWUXFWLRQ RI D SURSRVHG SURMHFW VKRXOG DYRLG ZKHUH SRVVLEOH YHJHWDWLRQ FRPPXQLWLHV WKDW SURYLGH VXLWDEOH KDELWDWIRUDVSHFLDO VWDWXVVSHFLHVNQRZQWRRFFXUZLWKLQWKH 3ODQQLQJ $UHD ,I FRQVWUXFWLRQ ZLWKLQ SRWHQWLDOO\ VXLWDEOH KDELWDW PXVW RFFXU WKH SUHVHQFHDEVHQFH RI DQ\ VSHFLDO VWDWXV SODQW RU ZLOGOLIH VS
HFLHV PXVW EH GHWHUPLQHG SULRU WR
FRQVWUXFWLRQWRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHKDELWDWVXSSRUWVDQ\VSHFLDO VWDWXV VSHFLHV ,I
VSHFLDOVWDWXV VSHFLHV DUH GHWHUPLQHG WR
RFFXS\ DQ\ SRUWLRQ RI D SURMHFW VLWH DYRLGDQFH DQG PLQLPL]DWLRQ PHDVXUHV VKDOO EH LQFRUSRUDWHG LQ
WR WKH
FRQVWUXFWLRQ SKDVH RI D SURMHFW WR DYRLG GLUHFW RU LQFLGHQWDO WDNHRIDOLVWHGVSHFLHVWRWKHJUHDWHVWH[WHQWIHDVLEOH 9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

%,2
'LUHFWRULQFLGHQWDOWDNHRIDQ\VWDWHRUIHGHUDOO\OLVWHG VSHFLHV VKRXOG EH DYRLGHG WR WKH JUHDWHVW H[WHQW IHDVLEOH ,I FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI D SURSRVHG SURMHFW ZLOO UHVXOW LQ WKH GLUHFW RU LQFLGHQWDO WDNH RI D OLVWHG VSHFLHV FRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWK WKH UHVRXUFHV DJHQFLHV DQGRU DGGLWLRQDO SHUPLWWLQJ PD\ EH
UHTXLUHG $JHQF\ FRQVXOWDWLRQ WKURXJK WKH & DOLIRUQLD 'HSDUWPHQW RI )LVK DQG:LOGOLIH
&'):
DQG 86 )LVK
DQG :LOGOLIH 6HUYLFH
86):6
6HFWLRQ RU 6HFWLRQ
SHUPLWWLQJSURFHVVHVPXVWWDNHSODFHSULRUWRDQ\DFWLRQWKDW (continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

%,2(continued from previous page)
PD\ UHVXOW LQ WKH GLUHFW RU LQFLGHQWDO WDNH RI D OLVWHG VSHFLHV 6SHFLILFPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVIRUGLUHFWRULQFLGHQWDOLPSDFWVW R D OLVWHG VSHFLHV ZLOO EH GHWHUPLQHG RQ D FDVHE\FDVH EDVLV WKURXJKDJHQF\FRQVXOWDWLRQ
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

%,2
'HYHORSPHQW ZLWKLQ WKH 3ODQQLQJ $UHD VKRXOG DYRLG ZKHUH SRVVLEOH VSHFLDO VWDWXV QDWXUDO FRPPXQLWLHV DQG YHJHWDWLRQ FRPPXQLWLHV WKDW SURYLGH VXLWDEOH KDELWDW IRU VSHFLDOVWDWXVVSHFLHV,IDSURSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOUHVXOWLQWKH ORVV RI D VSHFLDOVWDWXV QDWXUDO FRPPXQLW\ RU VXLWDEOH KDELWDW IRU VSHFLDO VWDWXV VSHFLHV FRPSHQVDWRU\ KDELWDW EDVHG PLWLJDWLRQ LV UHTXLUHG XQGHU &(4$ DQG WKH &DOLIRUQLD (QGDQJHUHG 6SHFLHV $FW
&(6$
0LWLJDWLRQ ZLOO FRQVLVW RI
SUHVHUYLQJ RQ VLWH KDELWDW UHVWRULQJ VLPLODU KDELWDW RU SXUFKDVLQJ RIIVLWH FUHGLWV IURP DQ DSSURYHG PLWLJDWLRQ EDQN &RPSHQVDWRU\ PLWLJDWLR Q ZLOO EH GHWHUP LQHG WKURXJK FRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWK WKH &LW\ DQGRU UHVRXUFH DJHQFLHV $Q DSSURSULDWH PLWLJDWLRQ VWUDWHJ\ DQG UDWLR ZLOO EH DJUHHG XSRQ E\WKHGHYHORSHUDQGOHDGDJHQF\WRUHGXFHSURMHFWLPSDFWVWR

VSHFLDO
VWDWXVQDWXUDOFRPPXQLWLHVWRDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW (continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH

%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

%,2(continued from previous page)

OHYHO$JUHHGXSRQPLWLJDWLRQUDWLRVZLOOGHSHQGRQWKHTXDOLW\ RI WKH KDELWDW DQG SU HVHQFHDEVHQFH RI D VSHFLDO VWDWXV VSHFLHV 7KH VSHFLILF PLWLJDWLRQ IRU SURMHFW OHYHO LPSDFWV ZLOO EHGHWHUPLQHGRQDFDVHE\FDVHEDVLV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

%,2
3URSRVHG SURMHFWV ZLWKLQ WKH 3ODQQLQJ $UHD VKRXOG DYRLG LI SRVVLEOH FRQVWUXFWLRQ ZLWKLQ WKH JHQHUDO QHVWLQJ VHDVRQ RI )HEUXDU\ WKURXJK $XJXVW IRU DYLDQ VSHFLHV SURWHFWHGXQGHU)LVKDQG*DPH&RGHDQGWKH0LJUDWRU\ %LUG7UHDW\$FW
0%7$
LILWLVGHWHUPLQHGWKDWVXLWDEOHQHVWLQJ
KDELWDW RFFX
UV RQ D SURMHFW VLWH ,I FRQVWUXFWLRQ FDQQRW DYRLG WKHQHVWLQJVHDVRQDSUH FRQVWUXFWLRQFOHDUDQFHVXUYH\PXVW EH FRQGXFWHG WR GHWHUPLQH LI DQ\ QHVWLQJ ELUGV RU QHVWLQJ DFWLYLW\LVREVHUYHGRQRUZLWKLQ
IHHWRIDSURMHFWVLWH,IDQ
DFWLYHQHVWLVR EVHUYHGGXULQJWKHVXUYH\ DELRORJLFDOPRQLWRU PXVW EH RQ VLWH WR HQVXUH WKDW QR SURSRVHG SURMHFW DFWLYLWLHV ZRXOG LPSDFW WKH DFWLYH QHVW $ VXLWDEOH EXIIHU ZLOO EH HVWDEOLVKHG DURXQG WKH DFWLYH QHVW XQWLO WKH QHVWOLQJV KDYH IOHGJHGDQGWKHQHVWLVQROR
QJHUDFWLYH3URMHFWDFWLYLWLHV
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
DQGGXULQJ
FRQVWUXFWLRQ

DFWLYLWLHV

'$50 X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

DSSURSU
LDWH DJHQF\
i.e &'): RU 86):6
RQ D FDVH E\
FDVHEDVLV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

%,2
3URMHFWLPSDFWVWKDWRFFXUWRULSDULDQKDELWDWPD\DOVR UHVXOW LQ VLJQLILFDQW LPSDFWV WR VWUHDPEHGV RU ZDWHUZD\V SURWHFWHG XQGHU 6HFWLRQ RI )LVK DQG :LOGOLIH &RGH DQG 6HFWLRQRIWKH&:$&'):DQGRU86$&(FRQVXOWDWLRQ GHWHUPLQDWLRQRIPLWLJDWLRQVWUDWHJ\DQGUHJXODWRU\SHUPLWWLQJ WR UHGXFH LPSD
FWV DV UHTXLUHG IRU SURMHFWV WKDW UHPRYH
ULSDULDQKDELWDWDQGRUDOWHUDVWUHDPEHGRUZDWHUZD\VKDOOEH LPSOHPHQWHG
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

%,2
3URMHFWUHODWHGLPSDFWVWRULSDULDQKDELWDWRUDVSHFLDO VWDWXV QDWXUDO FRPPXQLW\ PD\ UHVXOW LQ GLUHFW RU LQFLGHQWDO LPSDFWV WR VSHFLDO
VWDWXV VSHFLHV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK ULSDULDQ RU
ZHWODQG KDELWDWV 3URMHFW LPSDFWV WR VSHFLDO VWDWXV VSHFLHV DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK ULSDULDQ KDELWDW VKDOO EH PLWLJDWHG WKURXJK DJH
QF\ FRQVXOWDWLRQ GHY HORSPHQW RI D PLWLJDWLRQ VWUDWHJ\ DQGRULVVXLQJLQFLGHQWDOWDNHSHUPLWVIRUWKHVSHFLILFVSHFLDO VWDWXVVSHFLHVDVGHWHUPLQHGE\WKH&'):DQGRU86):6 9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

LPSDFWHG
ZHWODQG
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO
'$50 X

%,2

,Q DGGLWLRQ WR UHJXODWRU\ DJHQF\ SHUPLWWLQJ %HVW 0DQDJHPHQW 3UDFWLFHV
%03V
LGHQWLILHGIURP D OLVW SURYLGHG
E\ WKH 86$&( VKDOO EH LQFRUSRUDWHG LQWR WKH GHVLJQ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ SKDVH RIWKH SURMHFW WR HQVXUHWKDW QRSROOXWDQWV RU VLOWDWLRQ GUDLQ LQWR D IHGHUDOO\ SURWHFWHG ZHWODQG 3URMHFW GHVLJQIHDWXUHVVXFKDVIHQFLQJDSSURSULDWHGUDLQDJHDQG (continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
SURMHFWDSSURYDO

EXW
IRUORQJWHUP
RSHUDWLRQDO
%03VSULRUWR
LVVXDQFHRI
RFFXSDQF\
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

%,2
(continued from previous page)

LQFRUSRUDWLQJGHWHQWLRQEDVLQVVKDOODVVLVWLQHQVXULQJSURMHFW UHODWHG LPSDFWV WR ZHWODQG KDELWDW DUH PLQLPL]HG WR WKH JUHDWHVWH[WHQWIHDVLEOH
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV

&8/
,I SUHYLRXVO\ XQNQRZQ UHVRXUFHV DUH HQFRXQWHUHG EHIRUH RU GXULQJ JUDGLQJ DFWLYLWLHV FRQVWUXFWLRQ VKDOO VWRS LQ WKH LPPHGLDWH YLFLQLW\ RI WKH ILQG DQG D TXDOLILHG KLVWRULFDO UHVRXUFHV VSHFLDOLVW VKDOO EH FRQVXOWHG WR GHWHUPLQH ZKHWKHU WKH UHVRXUFH UHTXLUHV IXUWKHU VWXG\ 7KH TXDOLILHG KLVWRULFDO UHVRXUFHV VSHFLDOLVW VKDOO PDNH UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV WR WKH &LW\ RQ WKH
PHDVXUHV WKDW VKDOO EH L PSOHPHQWHG WR SURWHFW WKH GLVFRYHUHG UHVRXUFHV LQFOXGLQJ EXW QRW OLPLWHG WR H[FDYDWLRQ RI WKH ILQGV DQG HYDOXDWLRQ RI WKH ILQGV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK 6HFWLRQ RI WKH &(4$ *XLGHOLQHV DQG WKH &LW\¶V +LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ2UGLQDQF
H
,I WKH UHVRXUFHV DUH GHWHUPLQHG WR EH XQLTXH KLVWRULFDO UHVRXUFHV DV GHILQHG XQGHU 6HFWLRQ RI WKH &(4$ *XLGHOLQHVPHDVXUHVVKDOOEHLGHQWLILHGE\WKHPRQLWRUDQG
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
FRPPHQFHPHQW
RIDQGGXULQJ
FRQVWUXFWLRQ
DFWLY
LWLHV
'$50 X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

IROORZLQ
JSURFHGXUHVVKDOOEHIROORZHG
,I SUHKLVWRULF UHVRXUFHV DUH QRW IRXQG GXULQJ HLWKHU WKH ILHOG VXUYH\ RU OLWHUDWXUH VHDUFK H[FDYDWLRQ DQGRU FRQVWUXFWLRQ DFWLYLWLHVFDQFRPPHQFH,QWKHHYHQWWKDWEXULHGSUHKLVWRULF (continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
FRPPHQFHPHQW
RI
DQGGXULQJ
FRQVWUXFWLRQ

DFWLYLWLHV

'$50 X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

&8/(continued from previous page)
DUFKDHRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHV DUH GLVFRYHUHG GXULQJ H[FDYDWLRQ DQGRU FRQVWUXFWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV FRQVWUXFWLRQ VKDOO VWRS LQ WKH LPPHGLDWH YLFLQLW\ RI WKH ILQG DQG D TXDOLILHG DUFKDHRORJLVW VKDOOEHFRQVXOWHGWRGHWHUPLQHZKHWKHUWKHUHVRXUFHUHTXLUHV IXUWKHU VWXG\ 7KH TXDOLILHG DUFKDHRORJLVW VKDOO PDNH UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV WR WKH &LW\ RQ WKH PHDVXUHV WKDW VKDOO EH LPSOHPHQWHG WR S
URWHFW WKH GLVFRYHUHG UHVRXU FHV LQFOXGLQJ
EXWQRWOLPLWHGWRH[FDYDWLRQRIWKHILQGVDQGHYDOXDWLRQRIWK H ILQGVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&(4$*XLGHOLQHV6HFWLRQ ,I WKH UHVRXUFHV DUH GHWHUPLQHG WR EH XQLTXH SUHKLVWRULF DUFKDHRORJLFDOUHVRXUFHVDVGHILQHGXQGHU6HFWLRQRI WKH &(4$ *XLGHOLQHV PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHVVKDOO EH LGHQWLILHG E\ WKH PRQLWRU DQG UHFRPPHQGHG WR WKH /HDG $JHQF\ $SSURSULDWH PHDVXUHV IRU VLJQLILFDQW UHVRXUFHV FRXOG LQFOXGH DYRLGDQFHRUFDSSLQJLQFRUSRUDWLRQRIWKHVLWHLQJUHHQVSDFH SDUNV RU RSHQ VSDFH RU GDWD UHFRYHU\ H[FDYDWLRQV RI WKH ILQGV 1R IXUWKHU JUDGLQJ VKDOO RFFXU LQ WKH DUHD RI WKH GLVFRYHU\ XQWLO WKH /HDG $JHQF\ DSSURYHV WKH PHDVXUHV WR SURWHFW WKHVH UHVRXUFHV $Q\ SUHKLVWRULF DUFKDHRORJLFDO DUWLIDFWVUHFRY
HUHGDVDUHVXOWRIPLWLJDWLRQVKDOOEHSURYLGHG
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

&8/(further continued from previous two pages)
WR D &LW\ DSSURYHG LQVWLWXWLRQ RU SHUVRQ ZKR LV FDSDEOH RI SURYLGLQJ ORQJ WHUP SUHV HUYDWLRQ WR DOORZ IXWXUH VFLHQWLILF VWXG\
,I SUHKLVWRULF UHVRXUFHV DUH IRXQG GXULQJ WKH ILHOG VXUYH\ RU OLWHUDWXUH UHYLHZ WKH UHVRXUFHV VKDOO EH LQYHQWRULHG XVLQJ DSSURSULDWH 6WDWH UHFRUG IRUPV DQG VXEPLW WKH IRUPV WR WKH 6RXW
KHUQ 6DQ -RDTXLQ 9DOOH\ ,QIR UPDWLRQ &HQWHU 7KH UHVRXUFHVVKDOOEHHYDOXDWHGIRUVLJQLILFDQFH,IWKHUHVRXUFH V DUHIRXQGWREHVLJQLILFDQWPHDVXUHVVKDOOEHLGHQWLILHGE\WK H TXDOLILHG DUFKDHRORJLVW 6LPLODU WR DERYH DSSURSULDWH PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV IRU VLJQLILFDQW UHVRXUFHV FRX OG LQFOXGH DYRLGDQFHRUFDSSLQJLQFRUSRUDWLRQRIWKHVLWHLQJUHHQVSDFH SDUNV RU RSHQ VSDFH RU GDWD UHFRYHU\ H[FDYDWLRQV RI WKH ILQGV

,Q DGGLWLRQ DSSURSULDWH PLWLJDWLRQ IRU H[FDYDWLRQ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV LQ WKH YLFLQLW\ RI WKH UHVRXUFHV IR XQG GXULQJ WKH ILHOG VXUYH\ RU OLWHUDWXUH UHYLHZ VKDOO LQFOXGH DQ DUFKDHRORJLFDO PRQLWRU 7KH PRQLWRULQJ SHULRG VKDOO EH GHWHUPLQHG E\ WKH TXDOLILHG DUFKDHRORJLVW ,I DGGLWLRQDO SUHKLVWRULFDUFKDHRORJLFDOUHVRXUFHVDUHIRXQGG
XULQJ
(continued on next page)
[see Page 14] [see Page 14]

&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV(continued)

-#20)',,3%*-.%

,I XQLTXH SDOHRQWRORJLFDOJHRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHV DUH QRW IRXQG GXULQJ HLWKHU WKH ILHOG VXUYH\ RU OLWHUDWXUH VHDUFK H[FDYDWLRQ DQGRU FRQVWUXFWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV FDQ FRPPHQFH ,Q WKH HYHQW WKDW XQLTXH SDOHRQWRORJLFDOJHRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHV DUH GLVFRYHUHG GXULQJ H[FDYDWLRQ DQGRU FRQVWUXFWLRQ DFWLYLWLHV FRQVWUXFWLRQVKDOOVWRSLQWKHLPPHGLDWH
YLFLQLW\RIWKHILQGDQG
D TXDOLILHG SDOHRQWRORJLVW VKDOO EH FRQVXOWHG WR GHWHUPLQH ZKHWKHU WKH UHVRXUFH UHTXLUHV IXUWKHU VWXG\ 7KH TXDOLILHG SDOHRQWRORJLVWVKDOOPDNHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVWRWKH&LW\RQWKH PHDVXUHVWKDWVKDOOEHLPSOHPHQWHGWRSURWHFWWKHGLVFRYHUHG (continued on next page)

3ULRUWR
FRPPHQFHPHQW
RI
DQGGXULQJ
FRQVWUXFWLRQ
DFWLYLWLHV
'$50 X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
&8/(continued from previous page)
UHVRXUFHVLQFOXGLQJEXWQRWOLPLWHGWRH[FDYDWLRQRIWKHILQG V DQGHYDOXDWLRQRIWKHILQGV,IWKHUHVRXUFHVDUHGHWHUPLQHGWR EH VLJQLILFDQW PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV VKDOO EH LGHQWLILHG E\ WKH PRQLWRU DQG UHFRPPHQGHG WR WKH /HDG $JHQF\ $SSURSULDWH PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV IRU VLJQLILFDQW UHVRXUFHV FRXOG LQFOXGH DYRLGDQFHRUFDSSLQJLQFRUSRUDWLRQRIWKHVLWH
LQJUHHQVSDFH
SDUNV RU RSHQ VSDFH RU GDWD UHFRYHU\ H[FDYDWLRQV RI WKH ILQGV 1R IXUWKHU JUDGLQJ VKDOO RFFXU LQ WKH DUHD RI WKH GLVFRYHU\ XQWLO
WKH /HDG $JHQF\ DSSURYHV WKH PHDVXUHV WR
SURWHFW WKHVH UHVRXUFHV $Q \ SDOHRQWRORJLFDOJHRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHVUHFRYHUHGDVDUHVXOWRIPLWLJDWLRQVKDOOEHSURYLGHG W R D & L W \DSSURYHG LQVWLWXWLRQ RU SHUVRQ ZKR LV FDSDEOH RI SURYLGLQJ ORQJ WHUP SUHVHUYDWLRQ WR DOORZ IXWXUH VFLHQWLILF VWXG\
,I XQLTXH SDOHRQWRORJLFDOJHRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHV DUH IRXQG GXULQJWKHILHOGV XUYH\RUOLWHUDWXUHUHYLHZWK HUHVRXUFHVVKDOO EHLQYHQWRULHGDQGHYDOXDWHGIRUVLJQLILFDQFH,IWKHUHVRXUFH V DUH IRXQG WR EH VLJQLILFDQW PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV VKDOO EH LGHQWLILHG E\ WKH TXDOLILHG SDOHRQWRORJLVW 6LPLODU WR DERYH DSSURSULDWH PLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHV IRU VLJQLILFDQW UHVR XUFHV FRXOG LQFOXGH DYRLGDQFH RU FDSSLQJ LQFRUSRUDWLRQ RI WKH VLWH LQ JUHHQ VSDFH SDUNV RU RSHQ VSDFH RU GDWD UHFRYHU\ H[FDYDWLRQVRIWKHILQGV,QDGGLWLRQDSSURSULDWHPLWLJDWLRQIRU H[FDYDWLRQDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQDFWLYLWL
HVLQWKHYLFLQLW\RIWKH
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

GHWHUPLQHG
WR EH RI 1DWLYH $PHULFDQ GHVF HQW WKH FRURQHU VKDOO ZLWKLQ KRXUV QRWLI\ WKH 1DWLYH $PHULFDQ +HULWDJH &RPPLVVLRQ
1$+&
7KH1$+&VKDOOWKHQFRQWDFWWKHPRVW
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
FRPPHQFHPHQW
RI
DQGGXULQJ
FRQVWUXFWLRQ

DFWLYLWLHV

'$50 X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

GLVWXUE
HG E\ IXUWKHU GHYHORSPHQW DFWLYLW\ XQWLO WKH ODQGRZQHU KDVGLVFXVVHGDQGFRQIHUUHGZLWKWKHPRVWOLNHO\ GHVFHQGDQWV UHJDUGLQJ WKHLU UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV LI DSSOLFDEOH WDNLQJ LQWR DFFRXQW WKH SRVVLELOLW\ RI PXOWLSOH
KXPDQ UHPDLQV 7KH
ODQGRZQHU VKDOO GLVFXVVDQG FRQIHU ZLWK WKH GHVFHQGDQWVDOO UHDVRQDEOH RSWLRQV UHJDUGLQJ WKH GHVFHQGDQWV
SUHIHUHQFHV
IRUWUHDWPHQW

9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

DSSURYDOV

'$50 X

+$=
(VWDEOLVK DQ DOWHUQDWLYH (PHUJHQF\ 2SHUDWLRQV
&HQWHULQWKHHYHQWWKHFXUUHQW(PHUJHQF\2SHUDWLRQV&HQWHU LVXQGHUUHGHYHORSPHQWRUEORFNHG

9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
UHGHYHORSPHQW
RIWKHFXUUHQW
(PHUJHQF\
2SHUDWLRQV
&HQWHU
)UHVQR)LUH
'HSDUWPHQW
DQG0D\RU
&LW\0DQDJHU¶V
2IILFH

X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

'38

X X

+<'
7KH&LW\VKDOOFRQWLQXHWREHDQDFWLYHSDUWLFLSDQWLQ WKH.LQJV:DWHU$XWKRULW\DQGWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKH.LQJV %DVLQ,5:03

9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

2QJRLQJ '38 X

+<'
7KH &LW\ DQG SDUWQHULQJ DJHQFLHV VKDOO LPSOHPHQW WKHIROORZLQJPHDVXUHVWRUHGXFH WKHLPSDFWVRQWKHFDSDFLW\ RI H[LVWLQJ RU SODQQHG VWRUP GUDLQDJH 0DVWHU 3ODQ FROOHFWLRQ V\VWHPVWROHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW

x, PSOHPHQW WKH H[LVWLQJ 6WRUP 'UDLQDJH 0DVWHU 3ODQ

6'03
IRUFROOHFWLRQV\VWHPVLQGUDLQDJHDUHDVZKHUHWKH
DPRXQW RI LPSHUYLRXVQHVV LV XQDIIHFWHG E\ WKH FKDQJH LQ ODQGXVHV
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
H[FHHGDQFHRI
FDSDFLW\RI
H[LVWLQJ
VWRUPZDWHU
GUDLQDJH

IDFLOLWLHV

)UHVQR
0HWURSROLWDQ
)ORRG&RQWURO
'LVWULFW

)0)&'

'$50DQG
3:

X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
+\GURORJ\DQG:DWHU4XDOLW\(continued)

+<'
7KH &LW\ DQG SDUWQHULQJ DJHQFLHV VKDOO LPSOHPHQW WKHIROORZLQJPHDVXUHVWRUHGXFHWKHLPSDFWVRQWKHFDSDFLW\RI H[LVWLQJRUSODQQHGVWRUPGUDLQDJH0DVWHU3ODQUHWHQWLRQEDVLQV WROHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW

&RQVXOW WKH 6'03 WR DQDO\]H WKH LPSDFWV WR H[LVWLQJ DQG SODQQHG UHWHQWLRQ EDVLQV WR GHWHUPLQH UHPHGLDO PHDVXUHV UHTXLUHGWRUHGXFH
WKHLPSDFWRQUHWHQWLRQEDVLQFDSDFLW\WROHVV
WKDQVLJQLILFDQW5HPHGLDOPHDVXUHVZRXOGLQFOXGH

x ,QFUHDVHWKHVL]HRIWKHUHWHQWLRQEDVLQWKURXJKWKHSXUFKDVH RI PRUH ODQG RU GHHSHQLQJ WKH EDVLQ RU D FRPELQDWLRQ IRU SODQQHGUHWHQWLRQEDVLQV
x ,QFUHDVH WKH VL]H RI WKH HPHUJHQF\ UHOLHI SXPS FDSDFLW\ UHTXLUHGWRSXPSH[FHVVUXQRIIYROXPHRXWRIWKHEDVLQDQG LQWRDGMDFHQWFDQDOWKDWFRQYH\WKHVWRUPZDWHUWRDGLVSRVDO IDFLOLW\IRUH[LVWLQJUHWHQWLRQEDVLQV
x 5HTXLUHGHYHORSPHQWVWKDWLQFUHDVHUXQRIIYROXPHWRLQVWDOO RSHUDWH DQG PDLQWDLQ /RZ ,PSDFW 'HYHORSPHQW
/,'

PHDVXUHVWRUHGXFHUXQRIIYROXPHWRWKHUXQRIIYROXPHWKDW ZLOOQRWH[FHHGWKHFDSDFLW\RIWKHH[LVWLQJUHWHQWLRQEDVLQV 9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
H[FHHGDQFHRI
FDSDFLW\RI
H[LVWLQJUHWHQWLRQ
EDVLQIDFLOLWLHV
)0)&'
'$50DQG
3:
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

VWRUPZDWHUTXDOLW\
EDVLQVWROHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQW
&RQVXOW WKH 6'03 WR GHWHUPLQH WKH LPSDFWV WR WKH XUEDQ GHWHQWLRQ EDVLQ ZHLU RYHUIORZ UDWHV DQG GHWHUPLQH UHPHGLDO PHDVXUHVUHTXLUHGWRUHGXFHWKHLPSDFWRQWKHGHWHQWLRQEDVLQ FDSDFLW\ WR OHVV WKDQ VLJQLILFDQW 5HPHGLDO PHDVXUHV ZRXOG

LQFOXGH

x 0 R G L I \ R Y H U I O R Z ZHLU WR PDLQWDLQ WKH VXVSHQGHG VROLGV UHPRYDOUDWHVDGRSWHGE\WKH)0)&'%RDUGRI'LUHFWRUV x ,QFUHDVH WKH VL]H RI WKH XUEDQ GHWHQWLRQ EDVLQ WR LQFUHDVH UHVLGHQFH WLPH E\ SXUFKDVLQJ PRUH ODQG 7KH H[LVWLQJ GHWHQWLRQEDVLQVDUHDOUHDG\DWWKHDGRSWHGGHVLJQGHSWK x 5HTXLUH GHYHORSPHQWV WKDW LQFUHDVH U XQRII YROXPH WR LQVWDOO RSHUDWH DQG PDLQWDLQ /RZ ,PSDFW 'HYHORSPHQW

/,'
PHDVXUHV WR UHGXFH SHDN UXQRII UDWHV DQG UXQRII YROXPHWRWKHUXQRIIUDWHVDQGYROXPHVWKDWZLOOQRWH[FHHG WKH ZHLU RYHUIORZ UDWHV RI W KH H[LVWLQJ XUEDQ GHWHQWLRQ EDVLQV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
H[FHHGDQFHRI
FDSDFLW\RI
H[LVWLQJXUEDQ
GHWHQWLRQEDVLQ

VWRUPZDWHU
TXDOLW\
IDFLOLWLHV
)0)&'
'$50DQG
3:
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
+\GURORJ\DQG:DWHU4XDOLW\(continued)

x +<'
7KH&LW\VKDOOZRUNZLWK)0)&'WR GHYHORSDQG
DGRSW DQ XSGDWH WR WKH 6'03 IRU WKH 6RXWKHDVW
'HYHORSPHQW $UHD WKDW ZRXOG EH DGHTXDWHO\GHVLJQHG WR FROOHFW FRQYH\ DQG GLVSRVH RI UXQRII DW WK H UDWHV DQG YROXPHV ZKLFK ZRXOG EH JHQHUDWHG E\ WKH SODQQHG ODQG XVHVLQWKDWDUHD
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
DSSURYDOVLQWKH
6RXWKHDVW
'HYHORSPHQW
$UHD

)0)&'
'$50DQG
3:
X

3XEOLF6HUYLFHV

36
$VIXWXUHILUHIDFLOLWLHV DUHSODQQHG WKHILUHGHSDUWPHQW VKDOO HYDOXDWH LI VSHFLILF HQYLURQPHQWDO HIIHFWV ZRXOG RFFXU 7\SLFDO LPSDFWV IURP ILUH IDFLOLWLHV LQFOXGH QRLVH WUDIILF DQG OLJKWLQJ7\SLFDOPLWLJDWLRQWR
UHGXFHWKHVHLPSDFWVLQFOXGHV

x Noise:%DUULHUVDQGVHWEDFNVRQWKHILUHGHSDUWPHQWVLWHV x Traffic:7 U D I I LF GHYLFHV IRU FLUFXODWLRQ DQG D ³NHHS FOHDU ]RQH´GXULQJHPHUJHQF\UHVSRQVHV
x Lighting: 3URYLVLRQ RI KRRGV DQG GHIOHFWRUV RQ OLJKWLQJ IL[WXUHVRQWKHILUHGHSDUWPHQWVLWHV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

'XULQJWKH
SODQQLQJSURFHVV
IRUIXWXUHIL
UH
GHSDUWPHQW
IDFLOLWLHV
'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH

3XEOLF6HUYLFHV(continued)

36
$V IXWXUH SROLFH IDFLOLWLHV DUH SODQQHG WKH SROLFH GHSDUWPHQW VKDOO HYDOXDWH LI VSHFLILF HQYLURQPHQWDO HIIHFWV ZRXOG RFFXU 7\SLFDO LPSDFWV IUR P SROLFH IDFLOLWLHV LQFOXGH QRLVH WUDIILF DQG OLJKWLQJ 7\SLFDO PLWLJDWLRQ WR UHGXFH SRWHQWLDO
LPSDFWVIURPSROLFHGHSDUWPHQWIDFLOLWLHVLQFOXGHV

x Noise: %DUULHUV DQG VHWEDFNV RQ WKH SROLFH GHSDUWPHQW VLWHV
x Traffic:7UDIILFGHYLFHVIRUFLUFXODWLRQ
x Lighting: 3URYLVLRQ RI KRRGV DQG GHIOHFWRUV RQ OLJK WLQJ IL[WXUHVRQWKHSROLFHGHSDUWPHQWVLWHV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

'XULQJWKH
SODQQLQJSURFHVV
IRUIXWXUH3ROLFH
'HSDUWPHQW
IDFLOLWLHV
'$50 X

36
$V IXWXUH SXEOLF DQG SULYDWH VFKRRO IDFLOLWLHV DUH SODQQHG VFKRRO GLVWULFWV VKDOO HYDOXDWH LI VSHFLILF HQYLURQPHQWDO HIIHFWV ZRXOG RFFXU
ZLWK UHJDUG WR SXEOLF
VFKRROV DQG '$50 VKDOO HYDOXDWH RWKHU VFKRRO IDFLOLWLHV 7\SLFDOLPSDFWVIURPVFKRROIDFLOLWLHVLQFOXGHQRLVHWUDIILFDQG OLJKWLQJ 7\SLFDO PLWLJDWLRQ WR UHGXFH SRWHQWLDO LPSDFWV IURP VFKRROIDFLOLWLHVLQFOXGHV

(continued on next page)
'XULQJWKH
SODQQLQJSURFHVV
IRUIXWXUHVFKRRO

IDFLOLWLHV

'$50ORFDO
VFKRROGLVWULFWV
DQGWKH
'LYLVLRQRIWKH
6WDWH$UFKLWHFW
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

IDFLOLWLHV

'$50 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

LQFOXGHV

x Noise:%DUULHUVDQGVHWEDFNVSODFHGRQVFKRROVLWHV x Traffic:7UDIILFGHYLFHVIRUFLUFXODWLRQ
x Lighting: 3URYLVLRQ RI KRRGV DQG GHIOHFWRUV RQ RXWGRRU OLJKWLQJIL[WXUHV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

'XULQJWKH
SODQQLQJSURFHVV
IRUIXWXUH
GHWHQWLRQFRXUW
OLE
UDU\DQG
KRVSLWDOIDFLOLWLHV
'$50WRWKH
H[WHQWWKDW
DJHQFLHV
FRQVWUXFWLQJ
WKHVHIDFLOLWLHV
DUHVXEMHFWWR
&LW\RI)UHVQR

UHJXODWLRQ

X

8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV
866
7KH &LW\ VKDOO GHYHORS DQG LPSOHPHQW D ZDVWHZDWHU PDVWHUSODQXSGDWH
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
ZDVWHZDWHU
FRQYH\DQFHDQG
WUHDWPHQW
GHPDQG
H[FHHGLQJ
FDSDFLW\
'38 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV(continued)

866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ H[LVWLQJ ZDVWHZDWHU WUHDWPHQW FDSDFLW\ WKH &LW\ VKDOO HYDOXDWH WKH ZDVWHZDWHU V\VWHP DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDO GHYHORSPHQW WKDW FRQWULEXWHV ZDVWHZDWHU WR WKH ZDVWHZDWHU WUHDWPHQW IDFLOLW\ WKDW FRXOG H[FHHG FDSDFLW\ XQWLO DGGLWLRQDO FDSDFLW\ LV SURYLGHG %\ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ WKH \HDU WKH &LW\ VKDOO FRQVWUXFW WKH IRO
ORZLQJLPSURYHPHQWV

x &RQVWUXFW DQ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ 0*' H[ SDQVLRQ RI WKH 5HJLRQDO :DVWHZDWHU 7UHDWPHQW DQG 5HFODPDWLRQ)DFLOLW\ DQG REWDLQ UHYLVHG ZDVWH GLVFKDUJH SHUPLWV DV WKH JHQHUDWLRQRIZDVWHZDWHULVLQFUHDVHG
x &RQVWUXFW DQ DSSUR[LPDWHO\
0*' H[SDQVLRQ RI WKH
1RUWK )DFLOLW\ DQG REWDLQ UHYLVHG ZDVWH GLVFKDUJH SHUPLWV DVWKHJHQHUDWLRQRIZDVWHZDWHULVLQFUHDVHG.
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
H[LVWLQJ
ZDVWHZDWHU
WUHDWPHQW
FDSDFLW\

'38 X

866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ H[LVWLQJ ZDVWHZD WHU WUHDWPHQW FDSDFLW\ WKH &LW\ VKDOO HYDOXDWH WKH ZDVWHZDWHU V\VWHP DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDO GHYHORSPHQW WKDW FRQWULEXWHV ZDVWHZDWHU WR WKH ZDVWHZDWHU WUHDWPHQW IDFLOLW\ WKDW FRXOG H[FHHGFDSDFLW\XQWLODGGLWLRQDOFDSDFLW\LVSURYLGHG $IWHU
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
H[LVWLQJ
ZD
VWHZDWHU
WUHDWPHQW
FDSDFLW\
'38 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

866
$7UDIILF&RQWURO7UDIILF0DQDJHPHQW3O DQWRDGGUHVV WUDIILFLPSDFWVGXULQJFRQVWUXFWLRQRIZDWHUDQGVHZHUIDFLOLWL HV VKDOO EH SUHSDUHG DQG LPSOHPHQWHG VXEMHFW WR DSSURYDO E\ WKH &LW\
DQG )UHVQR &RXQW\ ZKHQ ZRUN LV EHLQJ GRQH LQ
XQLQFRUSRUDWHG DUHD URDGZD\V
7KH SODQ VKDOO LGHQWLI\
DFFHVV DQG SDUNLQJ UHVWULFWLRQV SDYHPHQW PDUNLQJV DQG VLJQDJHDQGKRXUVRIFRQVWUXFWLRQDQGIRUGHOLYHULHV ,WVKDOO LQFOXGHKDXOURXWHVWKHQRWLILFDWLRQSODQDQGFRRUGLQDWLRQZLWK HPHUJHQF\VHUYLFHSURYLGHUVDQGVFKRROV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
FRQVWUXFWLRQRI
ZDWHUDQGVHZHU

IDFLOLWLHV

3:IRUZRUNLQ
WKH&LW\
3:
DQG)UHVQR
&RXQW\3XEOLF
:RUNVDQG
3ODQQLQJZKHQ
XQLQFRUSRUDWHG
DUHDURDGZD\V
DUHLQYROYHG
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV(continued)

866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ FDSDFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH H[LVWLQJ ZDVWHZDWHUFROOHFWLRQV\VWHPIDFLOLWLHVWKH&LW\VKDOOHYDOXDW H WKH ZDVWHZDWHU FROOHFWLRQ V\VWHP DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDO GHYHORSPHQW WKDW ZRXOG JHQH UDWH DGGLWLRQDO ZDVWHZDWHU DQG H[FHHG WKH FDSDFLW\ RI D IDFLOLW\ XQWLO DGGLW
LRQDO FDSDFLW\ LV SURYLGHG %\ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ WKH \HDU WKHIROORZLQJFDSDFLW\LPSURYHPHQWVVKDOOEHSURYLGHG x 2UDQJH$YHQXH7UXQN6HZHU
7KLVIDFLOLW\VKDOOEHLPSURYHG
EHWZHHQ 'DNRWD DQG -HQVHQ $YHQXHV $SSUR[LPDWHO\ IHHW RI QHZ VHZHU PDLQ VKDOO EH LQVWDOOHG DQG DSSUR[LPDWHO\ IHHW RI H[LVWLQJ VHZHU PDLQ VKDOO EH UHKDELOLWDWHG 7KH VL]H RI WKH QHZ VHZHU PDLQ VKDOO UDQJH IURP LQFKHV WR LQFKHV LQ GLDPHWHU 7KH DVVRFLDWHG SURMHFWGHVLJQDWLRQVLQWKH:DVWHZDWHU0DVWHU3ODQDUH 56$ 5/ &5(3 &5(3 &5(3 &5(3 &5(3 &5(/DQG&5(3
x 0DUNV$YHQXH7UXQN6HZHU
7KLVIDFLOLW\VKDOOEHLPSURYHG
EHWZHHQ &OLQWRQ $YHQXH DQG .HDUQH\ %RXOHYDUG
$SSUR[LPDWHO\ IHHW RI QHZ VHZHU PDLQ VKDOO EH LQVWDOOHG7KHVL]HRIWKH QHZVHZHUPDLQVKDOOUDQJHIURP LQFKHV WR LQFKHVLQ GLDPHWHU7KHDVVRFLDWHG SURMHFW GHVLJQDWLRQV LQ WKH :DVWHZDWHU 0DVWHU 3ODQ DUH &05(3DQG&05(3
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
FDSDFLW\ZLWKLQ
WKHH[LVWLQJ
ZDVWHZDWHU
FROOHFWLRQV\VWHP

IDFLOLWLHV

'38 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0*'
VXUIDFHZDWHUWUHDWPHQWIDFLOLW\QHDUWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQ RI $UPVWURQJ DQG 2OLYH $YHQXHV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG)LJXUH
RIWKH&LW\RI)UHVQR0HWURSROLWDQ
:DWHU 5HVRXUFHV 0DQDJHPHQW 3ODQ 8SGDWH
0HWUR
3ODQ8SGDWH
3KDVH5HSRUWGDWHG-DQXDU\
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
H[LVWLQJZDWHU
VXSSO\FDSDFLW\
'38 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV(continued)

866(continued from previous page)
x &RQVWUXFW DQ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ 0*' H[SDQVLRQ RI WKH H[LVWLQJQRUWKHDVWVXUIDFHZDWHUWUHDWPHQWIDFLOLW\IRUDWRWDO FDSDFLW\ RI 0*' LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG
)LJXUH
RIWKH0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
x &RQVWUXFW DQ DSSUR [LPDWHO\ 0*' VXUIDFH ZDWHU WUHDWPHQW IDFLOLW\ LQ WKH VR XWKZHVW SRUWLRQ RI WKH &LW\ LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG )LJXUH
RI WKH
0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ FDSDFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH H[LVWLQJ ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH IDFLOLWLHV WKH &LW\ VKDOO HYDOXDWH WKH ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH V\VWHP DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDO GHYHORSPHQWWKDWZRXOGGHPDQGDGGLWLRQDOZDWHUDQGH[FHHG WKH FDSDFLW\ RI D IDFLOLW\ XQWLO DGGLWLRQDO FDSDF LW\ LVSURYLGHG
7KH IROORZLQJ FDSDFLW\ LPSURYHPHQWV VKDOO EH SURYLGHG E\ DSSUR[LPDWHO\
x &RQVWUXFW QHZ JURXQGZDWHU ZHOOV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG)LJXUH
RIWKH0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
FDSDF
LW\ZLWKLQ
WKHH[LVWLQJ
ZDWHU
FRQYH\DQFH

IDFLOLWLHV

'38 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

5HVHUYRLU 7
QHDU WKH LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI &ORYLV DQG
&DOLIRUQLD $YHQXHV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG
)LJXUH
RIWKH0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
x &RQVWUXFW D PLOOLRQ JDOORQ SRWDEOH ZDWHU UHVHUYRLU

5HVHUYRLU 7
QHDU WKH LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI 7 HPSHUDQFH DQG
'DNRWD$YHQXHVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&KDSWHU
DQG) LJXUH

RIWKH0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
x &RQVWUXFW D PLOOLRQ JDOORQ SRWDEOH ZDWHU UHVHUYRLU

5HVHUYRLU 7
LQ WKH 'RZ QWRZQ 3ODQQLQJ $UHD LQ
DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG )LJXUH
RI WKH
0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
x &RQVWUXFW D PLOOLRQ JDOORQ SRWDEOH ZDWHU UHVHUYRLU

5HVHUYRLU 7
QHDU WKH LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI $VKODQ DQG
&KHVWQXW $YHQXHV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK &KDSWHU
DQG
)LJXUH
RIWKH0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
x &RQVWUXFW D PLOOLRQ JDOORQ SRWDEOH ZDWHU UHVHUYRLU

5HVHUYRLU7
QHDUWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRI$VKODQ $YHQXHDQG
+LJKZD\

LQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK&KDSWHU
DQG)LJXUH

RIWKH0HWUR3ODQ8SGDWH
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ FDSDFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH H[LVWLQJ ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH IDFLOLWLHV WKH &LW\ VKDOO HYDOXDWH WKH ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH
V\VWHP DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDO
GHYHORSPHQWWKDWZRXOGGHPDQGDGGLWLRQDOZDWHUDQGH[FHHG WKH FDSDFLW\ RI D IDFLOLW\ XQWLO DGGLWLRQDO FDSDFLW\ LV SURYLGHG 7KH IROORZLQJ FDSDFLW\ LPSURYHPHQWV VKDOO EH SURYLGHG DIWHU DSSUR[LPDWHO\WKH\HDUDQG
DGGLWLRQDOZDWHUFRQYH\DQFH
IDFLOLWLHV VKDOO EH SURYLGHG SULRU WR H[FHHGDQFH RI FDSDFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH IDFLOLWLHV WR DFFRPPRGDWH IXOO EXLOGRXWRIWKH*HQHUDO3ODQ8SGDWH

(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
FDSDFLW\ZLWKLQ
WKHH[LVW
LQJ
ZDWHU
FRQYH\DQFH
IDFLOLWLHV
'38 X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

6('$ 5HVHUYRLU
ZLWKLQ WKH QRUWKHUQ SDUW RI WKH
6RXWKHDVW'HYHORSPHQW$UHD
x &RQVWUXFW D PLOOLRQ JDOORQ SRWDEOH ZDWHU UHVHUYRLU

6('$ 5HVHUYRLU
ZLWKLQ WKH VRXWKHUQ SDUW RI WKH
6RXWKHDVW'HYHORSPHQW$UHD
$GGLWLRQDO ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH IDFLOLWLHV VKDOO EH SURYLGHG SULRU WR H[FHHGDQFH RI FDSDFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH ZDWHU FRQYH\DQFH IDFLOLWLHV WR DFFRPPRGDWH IXOO EXLOGRXW RI WKH *HQHUDO 3ODQ 8SGDWH
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPVHydrology and Water Quality 866
,Q RUGHU WR PDLQWDLQ )UHVQR ,UULJDWLRQ 'LVWULFW FDQDO RSHUDELOLW\ )0)&' VKDOO PDLQWDLQ RSHUDWLRQDO LQWHUPLWWHQW IORZV GXULQJ WKH GU\ VHDVRQ ZLWKLQ GHILQHG FKDQQHO FDSDFLW\ DQGGRZQVWUHDPFDSWXUHFDSDELOLWLHVIRUUHFKDUJH
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

'XULQJWKHGU\
VHDVRQ
)UHVQR
,UULJDWLRQ
'LVWULFW
),'

X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

D
) 0 ) & ' VKDOO FRQGXFW SUHOLPLQDU\ LQYHVWLJDWLRQV RQ XQGHYHORSHG ODQGV RXWVLGH RI KLJKO\ XUEDQL]HG DUHDV 7KHVH LQYHVWLJDWLRQV VKDOO H[DPLQH ZHWODQG K\GURORJ\ YHJHWDWLRQ DQG VRLO W\SHV 7KHVH SUHOLPLQDU\
LQYHVWLJDWLRQV VKDOO EH WKH EDVLV IRU PDNLQJ D
GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RQ ZKHWKHU RU QRW PRUH LQGHSWK ZHWODQG VWXGLHV VKDOO EH QHFHVVDU\ ,I WKH SURSRVHG SURMHFW VLWH GRHV QRW H[KLELW ZHWODQG K\GURORJ\ VXSSRUW D
SUHYDOHQFHRIZHWODQGYHJHWDWLRQDQGZHWODQGVRLOW\SHV WKHQQRIXUWKHUDFWLRQLVUHTXLUHG

E
:KHUH SURSRVHG DFWLYLWLHV FRXOG KDYH DQ LPSDFW RQ DUHDVYHULILHGE\WKH&RUSVDVMXULVGLFWLRQDOZHWODQGV R U ZDW H U V R I W K H 8 6
X U E D Q D Q G U X U D O V W U H D P V V H D V R Q D O ZHWODQGV DQG YHUQDO SRROV
)0)&' VKDOO REWDLQ WKH
QHFHVVDU\ &OHDQ :DWHU $FW 6HFWLRQ SHUPLWV IRU DFWLYLWLHVZKHUHILOOPDWHULDOVKDOOEHSODFHGLQDZHWODQG REVWUXFW WKH IORZ RU FLUFXODWLRQ RI ZDWHUV RI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV LPSDLU RU UHGXFH WKH UHDFK RI VXFK ZDWHUV $V SDUW RI )0)&'¶V 0HPRUDQGXP RI 8QGHUVWDQGLQJ ZLWK &')* 6HFWLRQ DQG SHUPLWV ZRXOGEHREWDLQHG IURPWKH86$UP\&RUSVRI(QJLQHHUVDQGIURPWKH
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWR
GHYHORSPHQW
DSSURYDOV
RXWVLGHRIKLJKO\
XUEDQL]HGDUHDV
&DOLIRUQLD
5HJLRQDO
:DWHU4XDOLW\
&RQWURO%RDUG

5:4&%

DQG
86$&(
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

F
:KHUH SURSRVHG DFWLYLWLHV FRXOG KDYH DQ LPSDFW RQ DUHDVYHULILHGE\WKH&RUSVDVMXULVGLFWLRQDOZHWODQGVRU ZDWHUV RI WKH 86
XUEDQ DQG UXUDO VWUHDPV VHDVRQDO
ZHWODQGV DQG YHUQDO SRROV
)0)&' VKDOO VXEPLW DQG
LPSOHPHQW D ZHWODQG PLWLJDWLRQ SODQ EDVHG RQ WKH ZHWODQG DFUHDJH YHULILHG E\ WKH 86 $UP \ &RUSV RI (QJLQHHUV 7KH ZHWODQG PLWLJDWLRQ SODQ VKDOO EH SUHSDUHG E\ D TXDOLILHG ELRORJLVW RU ZHWODQG VFLHQWLVW H[SHULHQFHG LQ ZHWODQG FUHDWLRQ DQG VKDOO LQFOXGH WKH IROORZLQJRUHTXDOO\HIIHFWLYHHOHPHQWV

L 6SHFLILF ORFDWLRQ VL]H DQG H[LVWLQJ K\GUROR J\ DQG VRLOVZLWKLQWKHZHWODQGFUHDWLRQDUHD
LL :HWODQG PLWLJDW LRQ WHFKQLTXHV VHHG VRXUFH
SODQWLQJ VSHFLILFDWLRQV DQG UHTXLUHG EXIIHU
VHWEDFNV ,Q DGGLWLRQ WKH PLWLJDWLRQ SODQ VKDOO HQVXUH DGHTXDWH ZDWHU VXSSO\ LV SURYLGHG WR WKH FUHDWHGZHWODQGVLQRUGHUWRPDLQWDLQWKHSURSHU
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

REMHFWLYHV

HVWDEOLVKDZHWODQGFUHDWLRQV XFFHVV
FULWHULD WR EH PHW

WR VSHFLI\ PRQLWRULQJ
PHWKRGRORJ\

WR LGHQWLI\ DV IDU DV LV SRVVLEOH
VSHFLILF UHPHGLDO DFWLRQV WKDW ZLOO EH UHTXLUHG LQ RUGHU WR DFKLHYH WKH VXFFHVV FULWHULD
D QG
WR
GRFXPHQW WKH GHJUHH RI VXFFHVV DFKLHYHG LQ
HVWDEOLVKLQJZHWODQGYHJHWDWLRQ

G
$PRQLWRULQJSODQVKDOOEHGHYHORSHGDQGLPSOHPHQWHG E\DTXDOLILHGELRORJLVWWRPRQLWRUUHVXOWVRIDQ\RQ VLWH ZHWODQG UHVWRUDWLRQ DQG FUHDWLRQ IRU ILYH \HDUV 7KH PRQLWRULQJ SODQ VKDOO LQFOXGH VSHFLILF VXFFHVV FULWHULD IUHTXHQF\DQGWLPLQJRIPRQLWRULQJDQGDVVHVVPHQWRI
ZKHWKHURUQRWPDLQWHQDQFHDFWLYLWLHVDUHEHLQJFDUULHG RXWDQGKRZWKHVHVKDOOEHDGMXVWHGLIQHFHVVDU\
(continued on next page)
[see Page 41] [see Page 41]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

H
,Q OLHX RI GHYHORSLQJ D PLWLJDWLRQ SODQ WKDW RXWOLQHV WKH DYRLGDQFH SXUFKDVH RU FUHDWLRQ RI ZHWODQGV )0)&' FRXOG SXUFKDVH PLWLJDWLRQ FUHGLWV WKURXJK D &RUSV DSSURYHG0LWLJDWLRQ%DQN
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see Page 41] [see Page 41]

866
:KHQ)0)&'SURSRVHVWRSURYLGHGUDLQDJHVHUYLFH
RXWVLGH LQ DUHDV WKDW VXSSRUW VHDVRQDO ZHWODQGV RU YHUQDO SRROV

D
'XULQJ IDFLOLW\ GHVLJQ DQG SULRU WR LQLWLDW LRQ RI JURXQG GLVWXUELQJ DFWLYLWLHV LQ DUHDV WKDW VXSSRUW VHDV RQDO ZHWODQGV RU YHUQDO SRROV )0)&' VKDOO FRQGXFW D SUHOLPLQDU\UDUHSODQWDVVHVVPHQW7KHDVVHVVPHQWZLOO GHWHUPLQH WKH OLNHOLKRRG RQ ZKHWKHU RU QRW WKH SURMHFW VLWHFRXOGVXSSRUWUDUHSODQWV ,ILWLVGHWHUPLQHGWKDWWKH SURMHFWVLWHZRXOGQRWVXSSRUWUDUHSODQWVWKHQQRIXUWKHU (continued on next page)
'XULQJIDFLOLW\
GHVLJQDQGSULRU
WRLQLWLDWLRQRI
JURXQG
GLVWXUELQJ
DFWLYLWLHVLQ
DUHDVWKDW
VXSSRUWVHDVRQDO
ZHWODQGVRU
YHUQDOSRRO
V
&DOLIRUQLD
'HSDUWPHQWRI
)LVK :LOGOLIH

&'):
DQG
86)LVKDQG
:LOGOLIH6HUYLFH

86):6

X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E
%DVHG RQ WKH UHVXOWV RI WKH VXUYH\ SULRU WR GHVLJQ DSSURYDO )0)&' VKDOO FRRUGLQDWH ZLWK &')* DQGRU LPSOHPHQW D 6HFWLRQ FRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWK 86):6 VKDOO GHWHUPLQH ZKHWKHU WKH SURMHFW IDFLOLW\ ZRXOGUHVXOW LQ D VLJQLILFDQW LPSDFW WR DQ\ VSHFLDO VWDWXV SODQW VSH FLHV (YDOXDWLRQ RI SURMHFW LPSDFWV VKDOO FRQVLGHU WKH

IROORZLQJ

x 7KH VWDWXV RI WKH VSHFLHV LQ TXHVWLRQ
e.gRIILFLDOO\
OLVWHG E\ WKH 6WDWH RU )HGHUDO (QGDQJHUHG 6SHFLHV $FWV

x 7KH UHODWLYH GHQVLW\ DQG GLVWULEXWLRQ RI WKH RQ VLWH RFFXUUHQFH YHUVXV W\SLFD O RFFXUUHQFHV RI WKH
VSHFLHVLQTXHVWLRQ
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

F
3ULRU WR GHVLJQ DSSURYDO DQG LQ FRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWK WKH &')* DQGRU WKH 86):6 )0)&' VKDOO SUHSDUH DQG
LPSOHPHQW D PLWLJDWLRQ SODQ LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK DQ\ DSSOLFDEOH 6WDWH DQGRU IHGHUDO VWDWXWHV RU ODZV WKDW UHGXFHVLPSDFWVWRDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQWOHYHO
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see Page 44] [see Page 44]

866
:KHQ)0)&'SURSRVHVWRSURYLGHGUDLQDJHVHUYLFH
RXWVLGH LQ DUHDV WKDW VXSSRUW VHDVRQDO ZHWODQGV RU YHUQDO SRROV

D
'XULQJ IDFLOLW\ GHVLJQ DQG SULRU WR LQLWLDWLRQ RI JURXQG GLVWXUELQJ DFWLYLWLHV LQ DUHDV WKDW VXSSRUW VHDVRQDO ZHWODQGV RU YHUQDO SRROV )0)&' VKDOO FRQGXFW D SUHOLPLQDU\ VXUYH\ WR GHWHUPLQH WKH SUHVHQFH RI OLVWHG YHUQDOSRROFUXVWDFHDQV
(continued on next page)
'XULQJIDFLOLW\
GHVLJQDQGSULRU
WRLQLWLDWLRQRI
JURXQG
GLVWXUELQJ
DFWLYLWLHVLQ
DUHDVWKDW
VXSSRUWVHDVRQDO
ZHWODQGVRU
YHUQDOSRROV

&'):DQG
86):6
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E
,I SRWHQWLDO KDELWDW
YHUQDO SRROV VHDVRQDOO\ LQXQGDWHG
DUHDV
RUIDLU\VKULPSH[LVW ZLWKLQDUHDVSURSRVHGWREH
GLVWXUEHG )0)&' VKDOO FRPSOHWH WKH ILUVW DQG VHFRQG SKDVHRIIDLU\VKULPSSUHVHQFHRUDEVHQFHVXUYH\V,IDQ DEVHQFH ILQGLQJ LV GHWHUPLQHG DQG DFFHSWHG E\ WKH 86):6 WKHQ QRIXUWKHU PLWLJDWLRQ VKDOO EH UHTXLUHGIRU IDLU\VKULPS

F
,IIDLU\VKULPSDUHIRXQGWREHSUHVHQWZLWKLQYHUQDOSRROV RU RWK HU DUHDV RI LQXQGDWLRQ WR EH LPSDFWHG E\ WKH LPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIVWRUPGUDLQDJHIDFLOLWLHV)0)&'VKDOO PLWLJDWH LPSDFWV RQ IDLU\ VKULPS KDELWDW LQ DFFRUGDQFH Z L W K W K H 8 6 ) : 6 U H T X L U H P H Q W V R I W K H 3 U R J U D P P D W L F %LRORJLFDO 2SLQLRQ 7KLV VKDOO LQFOXGH RQVLWH RU RIIVLWH FUHDWLRQ DQGRU SUHVHUYDWLRQ RI IDLU\ VKULPS KDELWDW DW UDWLRV UDQJLQJ IURP
WR
GHSHQGLQJ RQ WKH KDELWDW
LPSDFWHGDQGWKHFKRLFHRIRQVLWHRURII VLWHPLWLJDWLRQ 2U PLWLJDWLRQ VKDOO EH WKH SXUFKDVH RI PLWLJDWLRQ FUHGLW WKURXJKDQDFFUHGLWHGPLWLJDWLRQEDQN
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E
)0)&' VKDOO DY RLG DQG SURWHFW DOO SRWHQWLDO LGHQWLILHG 9(/%KDELWDWZKHUHIHDVLEOH

F
:KHUHDYRLGDQFHLVLQIHDVLEOHGHYHORSDQGLPSOHPHQWD 9(/% PLWLJDWLRQ SODQ LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH PRVW FXUUHQW 86):6 PLWLJDWLRQ JXLGHOLQHV IRU XQDYRLGDEOH WDNH RI 9(/% KDELWDW SXUV XDQW WR HLWKHU 6HFWLRQ RU 6HFWLRQ
D
RI WKH )HGHUDO (QGDQJHUHG 6SHFLHV $FW
7KHPLWLJDWLRQSODQVKDOOLQFOXGHEXWPLJKWQRWEHOLPLWHG WRUHORFDWLRQRIHOGHUEHUU\VKUXEVSODQWLQJRIHO GHUEHUU\ VKUXEV DQG PRQLWRULQJ RI UHORFDWHG DQG SODQWHG
HOGHUEHUU\VKUXEV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

'XULQJIDFLOLW\
GHVLJQDQGSULRU
WRLQLWLDWLRQRI
FRQVWUXFWLRQ

DFWLYLWLHV

&'):DQG
86):6
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0DUFKWKURXJK
-XO\
IRUD
SURMHFWWKDW
VXSSRUWVELUG
QHVWLQJKDELWDW
&'):DQG
86):6
X

866
:KHQ )0)&' SURSRVHV WR FRQVWUXFW GUDLQDJH
IDFLOLWLHVLQDQDUHDWKDWVXSSRUWVELUGQHVWLQJKDELWDW

D
)0)&' VKDOO FRQGXFW D SUH FRQVWUXFWLRQ EUHHGLQJ VHDVRQVXUYH\
DSSUR[LPDWHO\)HEUXDU\WKURXJK$XJXVW

RI SURSRVHG SURMHFW VLWHV LQ VXLWDEOH KDELWDW
O HYHH
DQGFDQDOEHUPVRSHQJUDVVODQGVZLWKVXLWDEOHEXUURZV

GXULQJ WKH VDPH FDOHQGDU \HDU WKDW FRQVWUXFWLRQ LV SODQQHGWREHJLQ,ISKDVHGFRQVWUXFWLRQSURFHGXUHVDUH SODQQHGIRUWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWWKHUHVXOWVRIWKHDERYH VXUYH\ VKDOO EH YDOLG RQO\ I RU WKH VHDVRQ ZKHQ LW LV FRQGXFWHG
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWRJURXQG
GLVWXUELQJ
DFWLYLWLHVGXULQJ
QHVWLQJVHDVRQ

0DUFKWKURXJK
-XO\
IRUD
SURMHFWWKDW
VXSSRUWVELUG
QHVWLQJKDELWDW
&'):DQG
86):6
X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E
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
%DVHG RQ DSSU RYDO E\ &')* SUH FRQVWUXFWLRQ DQG SUH EUHHGLQJVHDVRQH[FOXVLRQPHDVXUHV PD\EHLPSOHPHQWHGWR SUHFOXGH EXUURZLQJ RZO RFFXSDWLRQ RI WKH SURMHFW VLWH SULRU WR

SURMHFW
UHODWHG GLVWXUEDQFH %XUURZLQJ RZOV FDQ EH SDVVLYHO\ H[FOXGHG IURP SRWHQWLDO QHVW VLWHV L Q WKH FRQVWUXFWLRQ DUHD HLWKHUE\FORVLQJWKHEXUURZVRUSODFLQJRQH ZD\GRRUVLQWKH EXUURZVDFFRUGLQJWRFXUUHQW&')*SURWRFRO%XUURZVVKDOOEH H[DPLQHG QRW PRUH WKDQ GD\V EHIRUH FRQVWUXFWLRQ WR HQVXUHWKDWQRRZOVKDYHUHFRORQL]HGWKHDUHDRIFRQVW
UXFWLRQ
(continued on next page)
[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E\ LQVWDOOLQJ DUWLILFLDO EXUURZV DW D UDWLR RI RQ SURWHFWHG
ODQGVQHDUE\
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see Page 49] [see Page 49]

866
:KHQ )0)&' SURSRVHV WR FRQVWUXFW GUDLQDJH
IDFLOLWLHVLQWKH6DQ-RDTXLQ5LYHUFRUULGRU

D
)0)&' VKDOO QRW FRQGXFW LQVWUHDP DFWLYLWLHV LQ WKH 6DQ -RDTXLQ5LYHUEHWZHHQ2FWREHUDQG$SULO,IW KLVLV QRW IHDVLEOH )0)&' VKDOO FRQVXOW ZLWK WKH 1DWLRQDO 0DULQH )LVKHULHV 6HUYLFH DQG &'): RQ WKH DSSURSULDWH PHDVXUHV WR EH LPSOHPHQWHG LQ RUGHU WR SURWHFW OLVWHG VDOPRQLGVLQWKH6DQ-RDTXLQ5LYHU

E
5LSDULDQ YHJHWDWLRQ VKDGLQJ WKH PDLQ FKDQQHO WKD W LV UHPRYHG RU GDPDJHG VKDOO EH UHSODFHG DW D UDWLR DQG TXDQWLW\ VXIILFLHQW WRPDLQWDLQWKH H[LVWLQJ VKDGLQJ RI WKH FKDQQHO7KHORFDWLRQRIUHSODFHPHQWWUHHVRQRUZLWKLQ (continued on next page)
'XULQJLQVWUHDP
DFWLYLWLHV
FRQGXFWHG
EHWZHHQ
2FWREHU
DQG
$SULO
1DWLRQDO
0DULQH
)LVKHULHV
6HUYLFH

10)6

&'):DQG
&HQWUDO9DOOH\
)ORRG
3URWHFWLRQ
%RDUG

&9)3%

X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPVBiological Resources (continued)
866(continued from previous page)
)0)&' EHUPV GHWHQWLRQ SRQGV RU ULYHU FKDQQHOVVKDOO EH DSSURYHG E\ )0)&' DQG WKH &HQWUDO 9DOOH\ )ORRG 3URWHFWLRQ%RDUG
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV±Recreation / Trails

866
:KHQ)0)&'XSGDWHVLWV'LVWULFW6HUYLFH3ODQ

3ULRU WR ILQDO GHVLJQ DSSURYDO RI DOO HOHPHQWV RI WKH 'LVWULFW 6HUYLFHV3ODQ)0)&'VKDOOFRQVXOWZLWK)UHVQR&RXQW\&LW\RI )UHVQR DQG &LW\ RI &ORYLV WR GHWHUPLQH
LI DQ\HOHPHQW ZRXOG
WHPSRUDULO\GLVUXSWRUSHUPDQHQWO\GLVSODFHDGRSWHGH[LVWLQJRU SODQQHG WUDLOV DQG DVVRFLDWHG UHFUHDWLRQDO IDFLOLWLHV DV D UHVXOW RIWKHSURSRVHG'LVWULFW6HUYLFHV3ODQ,IWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW ZRXOGQRWWHPSRUDULO\GLVUXSWRUSHUPDQHQWO\GLVSODFHDGRSWHG H[LVWLQJ RU SODQQHG WUDLOV QR IXUWKHU PLWLJDWLRQ LV QHFHVVDU\ ,I WKH SURSRVHG SURMHFW ZRXOG KDYH DQ HIIHFW RQ WKH WUDLOV DQG DVVRFLDWHGIDFLOLWLHV)0)&'VKDOOLPSOHPHQWWKHIROORZLQJ
(continued on next page)
3ULRUWRILQDO
GHVLJQDSSURYDO
RIDOOHOHPHQWVRI
WKH'LVWULFW
6HUYLFHV3ODQ
'$503:
&LW\RI&ORYLV
DQG&RXQW\RI
)UHVQR

X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E
,I SHUPDQHQW GLVSODFHPHQW RI WKH DGRSWHG H[LVWLQJ RU SODQQHG WUDLOV DQG DVVRFLDWHG UHFUHDWLRQDO IDFLOLWLHV RFFXU WKHDSSURSULDWHGHVLJQPRGLILFDWLRQVWRSUHYHQWSHUPDQHQW GLVSODFHPHQW VKDOO EH LPSOHPHQWHG LQ WKH ILQDO SURMHFW GHVLJQRU)0)&'VKDOOUHSODFHWKHVHIDFLOLWLHV
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV±Air Quality

866

:KHQ 'LVWULFW GUDLQDJH IDFLOLWLHV DUH FRQVWUXFWHG )0)&'VKDOO

D
0LQLPL]H LGOLQJ WLPH RI FRQVWUXFWLRQ HTXLSPHQW YHKLFOHV WR QRPRUHWKDQWHQPLQXWHVRUUHTXLUHWKDWHQJLQHVEHVKXW RIIZKHQQRWLQXVH
(continued on next page)
'XULQJVWRUP
ZDWHUGUDLQDJH
IDFLOLW\
FRQVWUXFWLRQ

DFWLYLWLHV

)UHVQR
0HWURSROLWDQ
)ORRG&RQWURO
'LVWULFWDQG
6-9$3&'

X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

E
& R Q VWUXFWLRQ VKDOO EHFXUWDLOHG DVPXFK DVSRVVLEOH ZKHQ WKH$LU4XDOLW\,QGH[
$4,
LVDERYH$4,IRUHFDVWVFDQ
EHIRXQGRQWKH6-9$3&'ZHEVLWH

F
2IIURDGWUXFNVVKRXOGEHHTXLSSHGZLWKRQ URDGHQJLQHVLI SRVVLEOH

G
&RQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWVKRXOG KDYHHQJLQHVWKDWPHHWWKH FXUUHQW RIIURDG HQJLQH HPLVVLRQ VWDQGDUG
DV FHUWLILHG E\
&$5%
RU EH UHSRZHUHG ZLWK DQ HQJLQH WKDW PHHWV WKLV VWDQGDUG
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

[see previous
page]
[see previous
page]

8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV±Adequacy of Storm Water Drainage Facilities
866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ FDSDFLW\ ZLWKLQ WKH H[LVWLQJ VWRUP ZDWHUGUDLQDJHIDFLOLWLHVWKH&LW\VKDOOFRRUGLQDWHZLWK)0)&' WR HYDOXDWH WKH VWRUP ZDWHU GUDLQDJH V\VWHP DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDO GHYHORSPHQW WKDW ZRXOG FRQYH\ DGGLWLRQDO VWRUP ZDWHU WRDIDFLOLW\ WKDW ZRXOG H[SHULHQFHDQ H[FHHGDQFH
RIFDSDFLW\XQWLOWKHQHFHVVDU\DGGLWLRQDOFDSDFLW\LVSURYLGHG 9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
FDSDFLW\ZLWKLQ
WKHH[LVWLQJVWRUP
ZDWHUGUDLQDJH

IDFLOLWL
HV
)0)&'3:
DQG'$50
X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

0(,50,7,*$7,210($685(021,725,1*&+(&./,67)25)LJ*DUGHQ)LQDQFLDO&HQWHU2IILFH 0D\

0,7,*$7,210($685( :+(1
,03/(0(17('
&203/,$1&(
9(5,),('%< $ % & ' ( )

$,QFRUSRUDWHGLQWR3URMHFW &0LWLJDWLRQLQ3URFHVV (3DUWRI&LW\:LGH3URJUDP %0LWLJDWHG '5HVSRQVLEOH$JHQF\&RQWDFWHG )1RW$SSOLFDEOH 3DJH
8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV±Adequacy of Water Supply Capacity
866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ H[LVWLQJ ZDWHU VXSSO\ FDSDFLW\ WKH&LW\VKDOOH YDOXDWHWKHZDWHUVXSSO\V\VWHPDQGVKDOOQRW DSSURYHDGGLWLRQDOGHYHORSPHQWWKDWGHPDQGDGGLWLRQDOZDWHU XQWLO DGGLWLRQDO FDSDFLW\ LV SURYLGHG %\ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ WKH \HDU WKH &LW\ VKDOO FRQVWUXFW DQ DSSUR[LPDWHO\ $)\HDU WHUWLDU\ UHF\FOHG ZDW
HU H[S D Q V L R Q W R W K H ) U H V Q R
&ORYLV 5HJLRQDO :DVWHZDWHU 5HFODPDWLRQ )DFLOLW\ LQ D
FFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH 5HF\FOHG :DWHU 0DVWHU 3ODQ DQG WKH &LW\ RI )UHVQR 0HWURSROLWDQ :DWHU 5HVRXUFHV 0DQDJHPHQW3ODQXSGDWH
,PSOHPHQWDWLRQRI0LWLJDWLRQ0HDVXUH866 LVDOVR UHTXLUHG SULRUWRDSSUR[LPDWHO\WKH\HDU
9HULILFDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
H[LVWLQJZDWHU
VXSSO\FDSDFLW\
'38DQG
'$50
X X

8WLOLWLHVDQG6HUYLFH6\VWHPV±Adequacy of Landfill Capacity
866
3ULRU WR H[FHHGLQJ ODQGILOO FDSDFLW\ WKH &LW\ VKDOO HYDOXDWH DGGLWLRQDO ODQGILOO ORFDWLRQV DQG VKDOO QRW DSSURYH DGGLWLRQDOGHYHORSPHQWWKDWFRXOGFRQWULEXWHVROLGZDVWHWRD ODQGILOOWKDWLVDWFDSDFLW\XQWLODGGLWLRQDOFDSDFLW\LVSURYLGHG 9HULIL
FDWLRQFRPPHQWV

3ULRUWR
H[FHHGLQJ
ODQGILOOFDSDFLW\
'38DQG
'$50
X X

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Chapter 5

PREPARERS
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Fig Garden Office Complex | Chapter 5

CITY OF FRESNO| Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 5-1

LIST OF PREPARERS AND CONSULTATIONS

List of Preparers

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
x Travis Crawford, AICP, Principal Environmental Planner x Emily Bowen, LEED AP, Principal Environmental Planner

Persons and Agencies Consulted

City of Fresno
x Margo Lerwill, Planner

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Appendices
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Appendix A
Air Emissions Output Table
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Project includes a 4-story office building with 90,000 sq ft of floor space on a 1.08 acre lot. Project also includes a 2.35 acre parking lot, which will be built over a demolished 44-unit apartment building.

Construction Phase -
Vehicle Trips - Weekday trip rate has been reconciled with the Trip Generation Analysis performed by Precision Civil Enginnering, Inc.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Proposed Project is within 1/4 mile of Fig Garden Village - a major job center and within 1/2 mile of the City of Fresno Palm/Butler Bus Service.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Office Park 90.00 1000sqft 1.08 90,000.00 0
Parking Lot 329.00 Space 2.35 131,600.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.7 45

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
2000Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
00 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment
San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 1 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.07 1.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.96 2.35
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.42 11.03
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 2 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2019 0.2024 1.8806 1.3831 2.8100e-
003

0.1185 0.0954 0.2139 0.0511 0.0893 0.1404 0.0000 251.4244 251.4244 0.0492 0.0000 252.6533 2020 0.8419 1.6818 1.4552 3.0900e-
003

0.0623 0.0819 0.1442 0.0169 0.0770 0.0939 0.0000 274.2992 274.2992 0.0481 0.0000 275.5004 Maximum 0.8419 1.8806 1.4552 3.0900e-
003

0.1185 0.0954 0.2139 0.0511 0.0893 0.1404 0.0000 274.2992 274.2992 0.0492 0.0000 275.5004 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2019 0.2024 1.8806 1.3831 2.8100e-
003

0.1185 0.0954 0.2139 0.0511 0.0893 0.1404 0.0000 251.4242 251.4242 0.0492 0.0000 252.6530 2020 0.8419 1.6818 1.4552 3.0900e-
003

0.0623 0.0819 0.1442 0.0169 0.0770 0.0939 0.0000 274.2990 274.2990 0.0481 0.0000 275.5002 Maximum 0.8419 1.8806 1.4552 3.0900e-
003

0.1185 0.0954 0.2139 0.0511 0.0893 0.1404 0.0000 274.2990 274.2990 0.0492 0.0000 275.5002 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 3 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4680 5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Energy 0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
Mobile 2.2952 9.9751 25.3707 0.0635 0.7080 0.2671 0.9751 0.1907 0.2548 0.4455 0.0000 1,243.483 4 1,243.483
4 0.2695 0.0000 1,250.219
5 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 16.9903 0.0000 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0748 0.0000 5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732 Total 2.7742 10.0757 25.4619 0.0641 0.7080 0.2747 0.9827 0.1907 0.2624 0.4531 22.0651 1,352.897 4 1,374.962
5 1.7969 0.0143 1,424.151
0 Unmitigated Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-1-2019 9-30-2019 1.1116 1.1116
2 10-1-2019 12-31-2019 0.9573 0.9573
3 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 0.8603 0.8603
4 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 0.8577 0.8577
5 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 0.7742 0.7742
Highest 1.1116 1.1116
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 4 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Energy 0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
Mobile 1.9423 7.6196 19.2470 0.0474 0.4770 0.2002 0.6772 0.1285 0.1909 0.3194 0.0000 891.4175 891.4175 0.2289 0.0000 897.1390 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 16.9903 0.0000 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.0748 0.0000 5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732 Total 2.4214 7.7201 19.3383 0.0480 0.4770 0.2078 0.6848 0.1285 0.1986 0.3271 22.0651 1,000.831 5 1,022.896
6 1.7563 0.0143 1,071.070
4 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

12.72 23.38 24.05 25.05 32.62 24.36 30.31 32.62 24.32 27.81 0.00 26.02 25.61 2.26 0.00 24.79 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 5 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/1/2019 7/26/2019 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/27/2019 8/2/2019 5 5 3 Grading Grading 8/3/2019 8/14/2019 5 8
4 Building Construction Building Construction 8/15/2019 7/1/2020 5 230 5 Paving Paving 7/2/2020 7/27/2020 5 18
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/28/2020 8/20/2020 5 18 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 135,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 45,000; Striped Parking Area: 7,896 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 2.35
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 6 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 7 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.2 Demolition - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e-
004

0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003

0.0000 34.8672
Total 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e-
004

0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003

0.0000 34.8672
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Architectural Coating 1 17.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 84.00 36.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 8 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.2 Demolition - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.0000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1113 1.1113 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.1122
Total 7.0000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1113 1.1113 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.1122
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e-
004

0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003

0.0000 34.8671
Total 0.0351 0.3578 0.2206 3.9000e-
004

0.0180 0.0180 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 34.6263 34.6263 9.6300e- 003

0.0000 34.8671
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 9 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

4.9000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1113 1.1113 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.1122
Total 7.0000e-
004

4.9000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.1113 1.1113 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.1122
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0452 0.0000 0.0452 0.0248 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0108 0.1139 0.0552 9.0000e-
005

5.9800e-
003

5.5000e-
003

0.0000 8.5422 8.5422 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.6097
Total 0.0108 0.1139 0.0552 9.0000e-
005

0.0452 5.9800e-
003

0.0512 0.0248 5.5000e-
003

0.0303 0.0000 8.5422 8.5422 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.6097
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 10 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.3 Site Preparation - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.4800e-
003

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.3334 0.3334 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3337
Total 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.4800e-
003

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.3334 0.3334 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3337
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0452 0.0000 0.0452 0.0248 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0108 0.1139 0.0552 9.0000e-
005

5.9800e-
003

5.5000e-
003

0.0000 8.5422 8.5422 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.6097
Total 0.0108 0.1139 0.0552 9.0000e-
005

0.0452 5.9800e-
003

0.0512 0.0248 5.5000e-
003

0.0303 0.0000 8.5422 8.5422 2.7000e-
003

0.0000 8.6097
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 11 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.3 Site Preparation - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.4800e-
003

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.3334 0.3334 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3337
Total 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.4800e-
003

0.0000 3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0000 1.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.3334 0.3334 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.3337
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0103 0.1134 0.0652 1.2000e-
004

5.5900e-
003

5.1400e-
003

0.0000 10.6569 10.6569 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.7412
Total 0.0103 0.1134 0.0652 1.2000e-
004

0.0262 5.5900e-
003

0.0318 0.0135 5.1400e-
003

0.0186 0.0000 10.6569 10.6569 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.7412
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 12 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.4 Grading - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.9700e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.4445 0.4445 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4449
Total 2.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.9700e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.4445 0.4445 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4449
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0103 0.1134 0.0652 1.2000e-
004

5.5900e-
003

5.1400e-
003

0.0000 10.6569 10.6569 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.7412
Total 0.0103 0.1134 0.0652 1.2000e-
004

0.0262 5.5900e-
003

0.0318 0.0135 5.1400e-
003

0.0186 0.0000 10.6569 10.6569 3.3700e-
003

0.0000 10.7412
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 13 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

2.0000e-
004

1.9700e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.4445 0.4445 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4449
Total 2.8000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.9700e-
003

0.0000 4.8000e-
004

1.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.4445 0.4445 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4449
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1169 1.0434 0.8496 1.3300e-
003

0.0639 0.0639 0.0600 0.0600 0.0000 116.3766 116.3766 0.0284 0.0000 117.0853 Total 0.1169 1.0434 0.8496 1.3300e-
003

0.0639 0.0639 0.0600 0.0600 0.0000 116.3766 116.3766 0.0284 0.0000 117.0853 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 14 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

0.2377 0.0478 5.1000e-
004

0.0118 1.8000e-
003

0.0136 3.4100e-
003

1.7200e-
003

5.1300e-
003

0.0000 48.5283 48.5283 4.0500e-
003

0.0000 48.6296
Worker 0.0193 0.0136 0.1365 3.4000e-
004

0.0332 2.4000e-
004

0.0335 8.8400e-
003

2.3000e-
004

9.0600e-
003

0.0000 30.8049 30.8049 9.9000e-
004

0.0000 30.8296
Total 0.0280 0.2512 0.1842 8.5000e-
004

0.0451 2.0400e-
003

0.0471 0.0123 1.9500e-
003

0.0142 0.0000 79.3333 79.3333 5.0400e-
003

0.0000 79.4591
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1169 1.0434 0.8496 1.3300e-
003

0.0639 0.0639 0.0600 0.0600 0.0000 116.3764 116.3764 0.0284 0.0000 117.0852 Total 0.1169 1.0434 0.8496 1.3300e-
003

0.0639 0.0639 0.0600 0.0600 0.0000 116.3764 116.3764 0.0284 0.0000 117.0852 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 15 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

0.2377 0.0478 5.1000e-
004

0.0118 1.8000e-
003

0.0136 3.4100e-
003

1.7200e-
003

5.1300e-
003

0.0000 48.5283 48.5283 4.0500e-
003

0.0000 48.6296
Worker 0.0193 0.0136 0.1365 3.4000e-
004

0.0332 2.4000e-
004

0.0335 8.8400e-
003

2.3000e-
004

9.0600e-
003

0.0000 30.8049 30.8049 9.9000e-
004

0.0000 30.8296
Total 0.0280 0.2512 0.1842 8.5000e-
004

0.0451 2.0400e-
003

0.0471 0.0123 1.9500e-
003

0.0142 0.0000 79.3333 79.3333 5.0400e-
003

0.0000 79.4591
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1389 1.2567 1.1036 1.7600e-
003

0.0732 0.0732 0.0688 0.0688 0.0000 151.7045 151.7045 0.0370 0.0000 152.6298 Total 0.1389 1.2567 1.1036 1.7600e-
003

0.0732 0.0732 0.0688 0.0688 0.0000 151.7045 151.7045 0.0370 0.0000 152.6298 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 16 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

0.2870 0.0544 6.7000e-
004

0.0156 1.5800e-
003

0.0172 4.5200e-
003

1.5100e-
003

6.0300e-
003

0.0000 63.6707 63.6707 5.0300e-
003

0.0000 63.7963
Worker 0.0233 0.0158 0.1604 4.4000e-
004

0.0440 3.1000e-
004

0.0443 0.0117 2.9000e-
004

0.0120 0.0000 39.5006 39.5006 1.1300e-
003

0.0000 39.5289
Total 0.0326 0.3028 0.2149 1.1100e-
003

0.0596 1.8900e-
003

0.0615 0.0162 1.8000e-
003

0.0180 0.0000 103.1712 103.1712 6.1600e-
003

0.0000 103.3252
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1389 1.2567 1.1036 1.7600e-
003

0.0732 0.0732 0.0688 0.0688 0.0000 151.7044 151.7044 0.0370 0.0000 152.6296 Total 0.1389 1.2567 1.1036 1.7600e-
003

0.0732 0.0732 0.0688 0.0688 0.0000 151.7044 151.7044 0.0370 0.0000 152.6296 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 17 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.5 Building Construction - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.3400e-
003

0.2870 0.0544 6.7000e-
004

0.0156 1.5800e-
003

0.0172 4.5200e-
003

1.5100e-
003

6.0300e-
003

0.0000 63.6707 63.6707 5.0300e-
003

0.0000 63.7963
Worker 0.0233 0.0158 0.1604 4.4000e-
004

0.0440 3.1000e-
004

0.0443 0.0117 2.9000e-
004

0.0120 0.0000 39.5006 39.5006 1.1300e-
003

0.0000 39.5289
Total 0.0326 0.3028 0.2149 1.1100e-
003

0.0596 1.8900e-
003

0.0615 0.0162 1.8000e-
003

0.0180 0.0000 103.1712 103.1712 6.1600e-
003

0.0000 103.3252
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0107 0.1062 0.1105 1.7000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

5.4000e-
003

0.0000 14.7348 14.7348 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8506
Paving 3.0800e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1062 0.1105 1.7000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

5.4000e-
003

0.0000 14.7348 14.7348 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8506
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 18 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.6 Paving - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.6000e-
004

5.2000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.2923 1.2923 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2932
Total 7.6000e-
004

5.2000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.2923 1.2923 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2932
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0107 0.1062 0.1105 1.7000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

5.4000e-
003

0.0000 14.7348 14.7348 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8506
Paving 3.0800e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1062 0.1105 1.7000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

5.4000e-
003

0.0000 14.7348 14.7348 4.6300e-
003

0.0000 14.8506
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 19 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

5.2000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.2923 1.2923 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2932
Total 7.6000e-
004

5.2000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4500e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.2923 1.2923 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2932
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0152 0.0165 3.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.3024
Total 0.6554 0.0152 0.0165 3.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.3024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 20 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.5000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

4.4600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0984 1.0984 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0992
Total 6.5000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

4.4600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0984 1.0984 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0992
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.6532 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1800e-
003

0.0152 0.0165 3.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.3024
Total 0.6554 0.0152 0.0165 3.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
003

0.0000 2.2979 2.2979 1.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.3024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 21 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility

4.4000e-
004

4.4600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0984 1.0984 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0992
Total 6.5000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

4.4600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.0984 1.0984 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0992
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 22 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.9423 7.6196 19.2470 0.0474 0.4770 0.2002 0.6772 0.1285 0.1909 0.3194 0.0000 891.4175 891.4175 0.2289 0.0000 897.1390 Unmitigated 2.2952 9.9751 25.3707 0.0635 0.7080 0.2671 0.9751 0.1907 0.2548 0.4455 0.0000 1,243.483 4 1,243.483
4 0.2695 0.0000 1,250.219
5 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Office Park 992.70 147.60 68.40 1,854,444 1,249,486
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 992.70 147.60 68.40 1,854,444 1,249,486
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Office Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 82 15 3
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Office Park 0.471860 0.098559 0.152637 0.110567 0.032842 0.006164 0.021078 0.096768 0.001251 0.001645 0.002796 0.00112 4 0.002709 Parking Lot 0.471860 0.098559 0.152637 0.11056 7 0.032842 0.006164 0.021078 0.096768 0.001251 0.001645 0.002796 0.00112 4 0.002709 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 23 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 24 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Office Park 2.0502e
+006

0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Office Park 2.0502e
+006

0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0111 0.1005 0.0844 6.0000e-
004

7.6400e-
003

0.0000 109.4065 109.4065 2.1000e-
003

2.0100e-
003
110.0566
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 25 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Office Park 1.0494e
+006

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 46060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Office Park 1.0494e
+006

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 46060 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 26 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4680 5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Unmitigated 0.4680 5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.1070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Total 0.4680 5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 27 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1070 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.3600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.6000e-
004

5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Total 0.4680 5.0000e-
005

6.8200e-
003

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.4900e-
003

7.4900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 8.7600e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 28 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732
Unmitigated 5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Office Park 15.996 /

9.80402

5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 29 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Office Park 15.996 /

9.80402

5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 5.0748 0.5212 0.0123 21.7732
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929
Unmitigated 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 30 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Office Park 83.7 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Office Park 83.7 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 16.9903 1.0041 0.0000 42.0929
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 31 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/18/2019 2:47 PMPage 32 of 32 Fig Garden Land Holdings Plan Amendment - San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Air District, Annual -#20)',,3%*-.%

Appendix B
Project Trip Generation
-#20)',,3%*-.%

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Appendix B
Resumes
-#20)',,3%*-.%

113 N. Church St. Suite #302 | Visalia, CA 93291 | 559.840.4414 | www.candbplanning.com

Travis L. Crawford, AICP
Principal Environmental Planner
Specific Expertise
x CEQA & NEPA Documentation (EIR, IS/MND, CE, EA,
EIS) / Public Presentations / Regulatory Compliance
Education
x San Diego State University, B.A., English
x University of San Diego, Graduate Paralegal Certificate – emphasis in Environmental Law
Certifications / Memberships
x American Institute of Cert ified Planners (AICP), No. 025073
x Association of Environmental Planners (AEP)
x American Planning Association (APA)
x Graduate, Leadership Visalia
Professional Instruction
x Instructor, “Understanding CEQA”, California Rural
Water Association State Conference (2012 and 2013)
x Guest Speaker, Leadership Fresno Planning Day (2012) Employment
x 2014 – Present Principal Environmental Planner,
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
x 2002 – 2014 Principal Environmental Planner,
Quad Knopf, Inc.

Overview
Mr. Crawford is a tested environmental planner who specializes in obtaining environmental compliance for transportation projects, water/wastewater expansions, residential/commercial development projects, policy documents, college/school districts, Caltrans projects, and many other types of projects. He serves not only as a project manager, but as the lead CEQA author on the projects he is leading. Mr. Crawford brings a keen legal eye and is a trusted resource to cities, counties, school districts and developers throughout the Central Valley. His diverse project experience has involved him in most every type of project spanning up and down the State of California. He has worked with dozens of lead agencies and jurisdictions providing sound environmental compliance strategies.

Recent Experience
x City of Sanger General Plan – EIR
x Tulare County Andersen Village Residential
Development – EIR
x Tehachapi Pilot Travel Center – EIR
x Madera USD New Elementary School –
IS/MND
x Clovis - Active Transportation Plan – IS/MND
x Clovis - Peach Ave. Improvements – IS/MND
x City of Tulare – Willow Glen Residential /
Commercial Development – IS/MND
x City of Fresno – Fig Garden Financial Office
Complex – IS/MND
x Groveland CSD Water and Wastewater
Expansion Projects – IS/MND, CEQA+
x Livingston Water and Wastewater Expansion
Projects – IS/MND, CEQA+
Other Relevant Experience
x On-Call Environmental Planning for:
o City of Tehachapi
o City of Porterville
o Tulare County
-#20)',,3%*-.%

113 N. Church St. Suite #302 | Visalia, CA 93291 | 559.840.4414 | www.candbplanning.com

Emily Bowen, LEED AP
Principal Environmental Planner
Specific Expertise
x CEQA & NEPA Documentation / Sustainable
Building Practices; Greenhouse Gas/Climate Change
Analysis; Restoration of Arid Lands
Education
x California State University, Fresno, B.S., Biology
x University of California at Davis, Graduate Certificate – Green Building and Sustainable Design
Certifications / Memberships
x LEED Accredited Professional, New Construction,
United States Green Building Council
x Air Quality Management Certificate, San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District
x Certified Green Building Professional, Build It Green x Association of Environmental Planners (AEP)
Professional Instruction
x Adjunct Faculty, Fresno City College – General
Biology
x Adjunct Faculty, National University – General
Biology
Employment
x 2014 – Present Principal Environmental Planner, Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. x 2008 – 2014 Senior Environmental Planner, Pr ovost & Pritchard Consulting Group x 2006 – 2008 Associate Environmental Planner, Quad Knopf Overview
Ms. Bowen is an experienced environmental planner who assists Lead Agencies and developers in attaining environmental compliance pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. She has worked with several cities and counties throughout the California Central Valley, along with many Federal Lead Agencies, including the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Energy. She has extensive knowledge in preparing documents for a multitude of project types, including industrial processing plants, dairies and other animal confinement facilities, solar energy generation facilities, and water transfers and related infrastructure between special districts.

Recent Experience
x Tulare County Rock/Mine Expansion - EIR
x Tulare County Asphalt Plant - EIR
x Porterville Commercial Development –
IS/MND
x Porterville Water Recharge Basin – IS/MND
x City of Sanger General Plan – EIR
x Porterville Waste Transfer Facility –
IS/MND
x Porterville Westwood Development - EIR
x Tule River Indian Housing Authority
Development – EA/FONSI
x Tulare County Anderson Village – EIR
x Parlier WWTP Expansion – IS/MND, CEQA+
Other Relevant Experience
x On-Call Environmental Planning for:
o City of Tehachapi
o City of Porterville
o Tulare County
-#20)',,3%*-.%

,DQ-3DUNV3(
3ULQFLSDO3URMHFW0DQDJHU

(GXFDWLRQ
&DOLIRUQLD3RO\WHFKQLF6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\6DQ/XLV2ELVSR%6&(

3URIHVVLRQDO5HJLVWUDWLRQ
3URIHVVLRQDO5HJLVWHUHG&LYLO(QJLQHHU&DOLIRUQLD&
3URIHVVLRQDO$IILOLDWLRQ
$3:$&HQWUDO&$&KDSWHU.HUQ%UDQFK3DVW3UHVLGHQW $6&(6RXWKHUQ6DQ-RDTXLQ&KDSWHU%UDQFK3DVW3UHVLGHQW 5HVSRQVLELOLWLHV([SHULHQFH

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

EHFRPLQJDSDUWQHULQ

3URMHFW([SHULHQFH

7UDIILF ,PSDFW 6WXGLHV ± 6HQLRU (QJLQHHU IRU SUHSDUDWLRQ RI QXPHURXV WUDIILF LPSDFW VWXGLHV ZLWKLQ WKH IROORZLQJ&RXQWLHV
.HUQ)UHVQR.LQJV7XODUH/RV$QJHOHV5 LYHUVLGH6DQ%HUQDUGLQR,Q\R0DGHUD 0HUFHGDQG6DQ/XLV2ELVSR6WXGLHVZHUHSUHSDUHGIRUWKHIROOR ZLQJW\SHVRIGHYHORSPHQWV ODUJHPDVWHU
SODQQHGFRPPXQLWLHVUHVLGHQWLDOFRPPHUFLDODOWHUQDWLYHHQHUJ \ :LQGDQG6RODU
LQGXVWULDODQGVFKRRO
IDFLOLWLHV ,Q DGGLWLRQ WR SULYDWH GHYHORSPHQW VWXGLHV UHSRUWV ZHUH SUHSDUHG IRU JRYHUQPHQWDO DJHQFLHV

LQFOXGLQJ
&DOWUDQV &LW\ RI %DNHUVILHOG DQG WKH &RXQW\ RI .HUQ IRU QHZ IDFLOLWLHV DQDO\VLV LQWHUFKDQJH
IUHHZD\DOLJQPHQWVLQWHUVHFWLRQV
IRUGHVLJQSXUSRVHV

2Q&DOO(QJLQHHULQJ6HUYLFHV&LW\RI'HODQR±3URMHFW0DQDJHU'HVLJQ(QJLQHHUIRUGHVLJQRIDYDULHW\ RI FDSLWDO LPSURYHPHQW SURMHFWV LQFOXGLQJ LQWHUVHFWLRQ LPSURYHPHQWV IRU $73 DQG VDIH URXWHV WR VFKRROV SURMHFWV$GGLWLRQDOO\5 6KDVVHUYHGDVWUDIILFHQJLQHHUIRUWKHODVWVHYHUDO\HDUV
2Q&DOO (QJLQHHULQJ6HUYLFHV &LW\ RI %DNHUVILHOG ±3URMHFW0DQDJHU'HVLJQ (QJLQHHU IRU GHVLJQ RID YDULHW\ RI FDSLWDO LPSURYHPHQW SURMHFWV LQFOXGLQJ 0LQJ $YHQXH ZLGHQLQJ 5RVHGDOH +LJKZD\ 65

VWUHHWZLGHQLQJDQGVHZHUUHSODFHPHQWRQ3ODQ]5RDG
)ULDQW.HUQ5HORFDWLRQDW&DOORZD\'ULYH&LW\RI%DNHUVILHOG± 'HVLJQ(QJLQHHU3URMHFW0DQDJHUIRU GHVLJQRI¶UHORFDWLRQRIWKH)ULDQW.HUQ&DQDOLQFOXGLQJD ¶ORQJER[FXOYHUWVWUXFWXUHDQGGHVLJQ RIQHZURDGZD\FRQVWUXFWLRQRI&DOORZD\'ULYHDQG2OLYH'ULYH
DŽŚĂǁŬ^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶʹ WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌͬĞƐŝŐŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨW^Θ
ƚŚĞ ĞǆƚĞŶƐŝŽŶ
ŽĨDŽŚĂǁŬ^ƚƌĞĞƚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨZŽƐĞĚĂůĞ,ŝŐŚǁĂǇƚŽ^ŝĞŶĂ>ĂŶĞ͘/ŶĂ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚ ĂĚũĂĐĞ Ŷƚ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ ŽǁŶĞƌƐ͕ ƵƚŝůŝƚǇ ƐĞ ĂƌĐŚ ĂŶĚ ƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͘

ĞƐŝŐŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ŝƚǇŽĨdĞŚĂĐŚĂƉŝʹWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌͬĞƐŝŐŶ ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌĨŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨĂǀĂƌŝĞƚǇ
ŽĨ ĐĂƉŝƚĂů ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƌŽĂĚǁĂǇ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐͬǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐ͕ ĚƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐƐǇƐƚĞŵƐ͕ƵƚŝůŝƚǇŝŶǀĞƐƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƵƚŝůŝƚǇƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŵĂƉƉŝŶŐ͘
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Areas of Expertise
Special-Status Species Surveys
Project Management
GIS/Remote Sensing
Environmental Permitting
Environmental Compliance Monitoring
Project Coordination and Outreach
Education
M.S., Fisheries Biology, Humboldt State
University, 2009
B.S., Biology/Environmental Studies, Alma
College, 2004
Selected Professional Experience
Senior Scientist and Project Manager,
Colibri Ecological Consulting, F resno, CA,
2018–present
Environmental Scientist, Stantec
Consulting Services, F resno, CA, 2013–
2018
Remote Sensing Professional, Watershed
Sciences, Corvallis, OR 2011–2012
Volunteer Coordinator, West Eugene
Wetlands, Eugene, OR, 2010–2011
Biological Science T echnician, U.S. Fish &
Wildlife Service, Arcata, CA, 2005–2010
Professional Afﬁliations
The Wildlife Society
Association of Environmental Professionals
American Fisheries Society
Training
Basic Wetland Delineation, Wetland
Training Institute, 2022
CEQA 101 for Biologists, Association of
Environmental Professionals, 2021
Endangered Species Regulation and
Protection, UC Davis Continuing and
Professional Education, 2019
[email protected]
9493 N F ort Washington Road
Suite 108
F resno, CA 93730
559.242.6178
colibri-ecology.com
Ryan R. Slezak
Senior Scientist and Project Manager
Ryan is an environmental scientist with more than 15 years of professional experience. He has contributed to the biological resource sections of dozens of environmental impact reports, environmental impact statements, and other environmental compliance documents for projects throughout California. His strengths in this regard include a detailed knowledge of California ﬂora and fauna, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), federal and state endangered species regulations, the California Fish and Game Code, and a proven expertise in coordination, communication, and team leading.

Ryan has helped ensure environmental compliance for a variety of projects including those associated with municipal infrastructure development, energy development, spill response, pipeline construction, utility operations and maintenance, transportation, dam removal, habitat restoration, pollution remediation, and vegetation management. He has collaborated with government agencies, private consulting ﬁrms, non-pro ﬁt organizations, and academic researchers with a focus on biological assessments, environmental permitting, and ecosystem restoration. As Project Manager, he trains and assigns work to other Colibri biologists, provides quality assurance/quality control reviews of all deliverables, and coordinates closely with clients.

Relevant Experience
135 Madison MRH - 1 F ranklin, LLC, F ranklin Canyon RV Resort Project. Project Manager, Environmental Lead. Ryan is currently working as a lead environmental consultant for the conversion of an 18-hole golf course into an RV resort in Hercules, Contra Costa County, California. He ensures project compliance with CEQA and NEPA. Ryan conducted a biological assessment for NEPA, preliminary ﬁeld assessments for special-status species, and rare plant surveys, and he prepared aquatic resources permit applications. (March 2024 – Present).

Groveland Community Services District, Sewer and Drinking Water Improvement Projects Project Manager, Biologist. Ryan is a project manager for several sewer and drinking water improvement projects for the Groveland Community Services District in Groveland and Big Oak Flat, Tuolumne County, California. Ryan has performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA, wetland delineations, and pre-construction surveys. Ryan has also completed aquatic resources permit applications. (December 2022 – Present).
-#20)',,3%*-.%

Ryan Slezak Resume, Page 2 of 2
Relevant Experience continued

CV Development Partners, LLC, Flint Trail Access Road Project. Project Manager, Biologist. Ryan is currently working as a lead environmental consultant for the construction of an approximately 1-mile-long access road in Copperopolis, Calaveras County, California. The Flint Trail Access Road Project will link Flint Trail to Oak Creek Drive and the Golf Club at Copper Valley and will serve as a required secondary access for the Copper Valley masterplan community development. Ryan ensures project compliance with CEQA and NEPA. He conducts biological assessments, wetland delineations, aquatic resources permitting, and is developing an oak tree removal and replacement program in accordance with the MMRP (March 2022 – Present).

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc., Merced Mixed-Use Development Project. Project Manager, Biologist.

Ryan served as a biological consultant for the development of a 45-acre mixed use development project in Merced, Merced County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA and aquatic resources delineations. (December 2023 – July 2024).

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc., Madera Residential Development Project. Project Manager, Biologist.

Ryan served as a biological consultant for the construction of a 29-acre residential development in southeast Madera, Madera County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA. (F ebruary 2024).

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc., Warthan Meadows Residential Development Project. Project Manager, Biologist. Ryan served as a biological consultant for the construction of 187 single-family residences on approximately 55 acres in southeast Coalinga, F resno County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for NEPA. (F ebruary 2024 – March 2024).

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc., Tulare and Peach Residential Development Project. Project Manager, Biologist. Ryan served as a biological consultant for the construction of 44 single-family residences in southeast F resno, F resno County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA. (F ebruary 2024).

FirstCarbon Solutions, Inc, F oxglove Shopping Center Project. Project Manager. Ryan has served as a biological consultant for the development of a 191,150 square-foot shopping center in Madera, Madera County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA, aquatic resources delineations and permitting, and pre-construction surveys. (August 2023).

4Creeks, Inc, Bella Vita Mixed-Use Development Project. Project Manager. Ryan served as a biological consultant for the construction of a 24-acre mixed-use commercial and residential development in northwest F resno, F resno County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA. (March 2024).

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc., Kerman Sewer and Drinking Water Treatment Improvement Projects.

Project Manager, Biologist. Ryan served as a biological consultant for various sewer and drinking water system improvements including repair and replacement of existing sewer line, upgrades to sewer lift stations, and the construction of a 1,2,3-trichloropropane water treatment system in Kerman, Fresno County, California. He performed biological resources evaluations for CEQA and NEPA. (June 2022 - December 2022).

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Richard Miller
Air Quality and Climate Change Specialist
979.549.8478
[email protected]
ɶ
Summary
Richard Miller is an owner of Johnson Johnson & Miller Air Quality Consulting Services and an Air Quality/Climate Change Specialist with over two years of experience in air quality and greenhouse gas emission CEQA analysis and modeling for various development projects. Richard has worked on over 40 projects ranging from small-scale residential to large-scale industrial projects to create technically sound and legally defensible environmental documentation pertaining to all facets of AQ/GHG analysis through the use of CalEEMod, AERMOD, and HARP2.
ɶ
Experience
Johnson Johnson & Miller Air Quality Consulting Services Clovis, CA OWNER / AIR QUALITY & CLIMATE CHANGE SPECIALIST June 2019 – Present (November 2021) ● Conducts air quality and greenhouse gas emission CEQA analyses for various development projects ● Models projected construction and operational emissions ● Coordinates with remote, inter-agency team members and stakeholders to create a final product while meeting demanding deadlines
● Efficiently and effectively provides punctual, high-quality quality products to the firm’s clients ● Provides evaluations of criteria pollutant, hazardous air pollutant (HAP), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
ɶ
Education
Fresno City College / Associate of Science Degree: Business Administration (May 2016) Fresno, CA
Fresno State University / Bachelor of Arts Degree: Geography (May 2018) Fresno, CA
ɶ
Relevant Skills
Tools
● Mastery of Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Publisher, and Access ● Extensive working knowledge of CalEEMod, AERMOD, HARP2, ArcGIS, Adobe Acrobat, Google Earth, and Google Apps
● Wide-ranging knowledge of computer hardware and software Other Skills
● Troubleshooting methodologies
● Excellent written and verbal communication skills
● Exemplary professional writing and editing skills
● Extensive presentation and public speaking experience ● Experienced with using computer-mediated communication to effectively work with remote team members
● Ability to type at 80+ words per minute consistently and accurately

-#20)',,3%*-.%

'(%%,(-2+1621
'-2+1621--0(19,5210(17$/#*0$,/&20

$LU4XDOLW\6SHFLDOLVW
i '\QDPLFSURIHVVLRQDODQGKLJKO\HWKLFDO$LU4XDOLW\6SHFLDOLVWZLWKH[FHOOHQWLQWHUSHUVRQDODQGFRPPXQLFDWLRQVNLOOV +,*+/,*+762)6.,//6(;3(57,6(

(IIHFWLYH&RPPXQLFDWLRQ
7HFKQLFDO:ULWLQJ
(VWLPDWLQJ*UHHQKRXVH(PLVVLRQV
9DVWNQRZOHGJHRIWKHHLJKWFRXQW\
UHJLRQFRPSULVLQJWKH9DOOH\$LU%DVLQ
$VVLVWLQJ$SSOLFDQWVWKURXJK
3URFHGXUDO3URFHVVHV
$LU4XDOLW\0RGHOLQJ
3URMHFW&RRUGLQDWLRQ
.QRZOHGJHRI6-9$3&'5XOHV
3URFHVVHVDQG&RPSOLDQFH
5HTXLUHPHQWV
7UDLQLQJ1HZ(PSOR\HHV
3URMHFW6FKHGXOLQJ
+HDOWK5LVN$VVHVVPHQW6FUHHQLQJ
0LFURVRIW:RUG
0LFURVRIW([FHO
(0)$&
&DO((0RG

352)(66,21$/(;3(5,(1&(

6 D Q - R D T X L Q 9 D O O H \ $ L U 3 R O O X W L R Q & R Q W U R O ' L V W U L F W )HEUXDU\±6HSWHPEHU
x 3HUIRUPHGDLUTXDOLW\DQGJUHHQKRXVHJDVDQDO\VHVIRULQWHJUDWL RQLQ&(4$DQG1(3$HQYLURQPHQWDOGRFXPHQWVIRUYDULRXV GHYHORSPHQWDQGWUDQVSRUWDWLRQSURMHFWV
x (QYLURQPHQWDO&(4$1(3$GRFXPHQWVFRPSOHWHGLQFOXGHG (QYLURQPH QWDO,PSDFW5HSRUWV
(,5V
,QLWLDO6WXGLHV0LWLJDWHG
1HJDWLYH'HFODUDWLRQV
01'V

x 5HJXODUO\FRPSOHWHG$LU,PSDFW$VVHVVPHQWV
$,$
IRU,QGLUHFW6 RXUFH5HYLHZ
,65
IRUDSSOLFDQWVUHTXLUHGWRFRPSO\ZLWK
6-9$3&'5XOH

x 3URMHFW H[SHULHQFH VSDQQLQJ VHYHUDO SURMHFW W\SHV LQFOXGLQJLQIUDVWUXFWXUH OLQHDU WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ UHVLGHQWLDO FRPPHUFLDORLO ILHOGDQGLQGXVWULDOSURMHFWV
x 5HJXODUO\XVHG&DO((0RGWRHVWLPDWHDLUTXDOLW\HPLVVLRQVIRUYDULRXVSURMHFWV x 'HYHORSHG DQG LPSOHPHQWHG SURMHFW PLWLJDWLRQ VWUDWHJLHV ZKLFK RIWHQ UHTXLUHG WKH VXFFHVVIXO QHJRWLDWLQJ ZLWK UHVRXUFH DJHQFLHV
x ([SHULHQFHGLQGHYHORSLQJDQGZRUNLQJLQPXOWLGLVFLSOLQHSURMHFWWHDPV x 0HWLFXORXVLQNHHSLQJUHFRUGVDQGPDNLQJUHSRUWV
x 5HYLHZHGDQGHYDOXDWHGSHUPLWDSSOLFDWLRQVIRUDZLGHYDULHW\RIDSSOLFDWLRQV x &DOFXODWHG HPLVVLRQ UDWHV DQG XVHG HVWLPDWHG HPLVVLRQ UDWHV WRGHWHUPLQH FRPSOLDQFH RU QRQFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK DLU TXDOLW\ UHJXODWLRQV
x 3HUIRUPHGGHWDLOHGDQDO\VHVRIGHVLJQVVSHFLILFDWLRQVDQGSODQV x 3UHSDUHGFOHDUDQGFRQFLVHZULWWHQPDWHULDOPDLQWDLQHGDFFXUDW HUHFRUGVDQGILOHVDQGH[HUFLVHGVRXQGLQGHSHQGHQWMXGJPHQW ZLWKLQHVWDEOLVKHGSURFHGXUDOJXLGHOLQHV
x 3RVVHVVHVNQRZOHGJHRIDLUSROOXWLRQDQDO\VLVWHFKQLTXHVLQGXV WULDOSURFHVVHVDQGSROOXWLRQFRQWUROHTXLSPHQWDQGDSSOLFDEOH VWDWHDQGIHGHUDOODZVUXOHVDQGUHJXODWLRQV
x 3URILFLHQWLQFRPSXWHUDSSOLFDWLRQVDVUHODWHGWRWKHZRUNSHUIRUPHGDQGUHFRUGNHHSLQJDQGUHSRUWSUHSDUDWLRQSUDFWLFHV x $VVLVWHGLQGHILQLQJSHUPLWFRQGLWLRQVDQGLVVXLQJDXWKRULW\WRFRQVWUXFWSHUPLWV x $VVLVWHGLQ6-9$3&'UXOHGHYHORSPHQW

('8&$7,21

%DFKHORURI6FLHQFH'HJUHHLQ3ODQW6FLHQFH
&DOLIRUQLD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\)UHVQR
5()(5(1&(6

5HIHUHQFHVDYDLODEOHXSRQUHTXHVW
-#20)',,3%*-.%

:$/7(5-9$1*521,1*(1
3UHVLGHQW
:-9$FRXVWLFV,QF

([SHULHQFH

Dƌ͘ sĂŶ 'ƌŽŶŝŶŐĞŶ ŝƐ ƚŚĞ ĨŽƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ ŽĨ t:s ĐŽƵƐƚŝĐƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ ,ŝƐ ƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů ƐŬŝůůƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ƚŚĞ ƉƌĞĚŝĐƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐ ŽĨ ĂŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ͕ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͕ ƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐ ƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ŶŽŝƐĞ ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŶŽŝƐĞƉƌŽďůĞŵƐĂŶĚůŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͘,ĞŚĂƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞ ĚƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŶŽŝƐĞƐƚƵĚŝĞƐĨŽƌĂǀĂƌŝĞƚǇ ŽĨ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐ
Y Žƌ E
W ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ŚĂƐ ĚĞǀĞůŽ ƉĞĚ ŶŽŝƐĞ ůĞǀĞů ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĂŶĚ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĨŽƌ ĂĚĚ ƌĞƐƐŝŶŐ ŶŽŝƐĞͲƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐ ĂŶĚ ůŽŶŐͲƌĂŶŐĞ ŶŽŝƐĞ ĐŽŵƉĂƚŝďŝůŝƚǇ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͘Dƌ͘sĂŶ'ƌŽŶŝŶŐĞŶŚĂƐƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌĞǆƉĞƌƚŝƐĞŝŶƉƌĞƉĂƌŝŶŐƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŶŽŝƐĞĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌĨĞĚĞƌĂůůǇ ĨƵŶĚĞĚ ƌŽĂĚǁĂǇ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ƵƐŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ WƌŽƚŽĐŽů ͘ Dƌ͘ sĂŶ 'ƌŽŶŝŶŐĞŶ ŚĂƐ ĂůƐŽ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚŐĞŶĞƌĂůƉůĂŶŶŽŝƐĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚŶŽŝƐĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚƵƉĚĂƚĞƐĨŽƌƐĞǀĞƌĂůĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘
Dƌ͘sĂŶ'ƌŽŶŝŶŐĞŶďĞĐĂŵĞŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚŝŶĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŶŽŝƐĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůŝŶ ϮϬϬϱ͕ǁŚĞŶŚĞũŽŝŶĞĚƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƵůƚŝŶŐ ƐƚĂĨĨ Ăƚ ƌŽǁŶͲƵŶƚŝŶ ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞƐ͕ /ŶĐ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŝŵĞ͕ ŚĞ ŚĂƐĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚ ƐŚŽƌƚͲ ĂŶĚ ůŽŶŐͲƚĞƌŵ ĂŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ ŶŽŝƐĞ ŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ĂĐŽƵƐƚŝĐĂů ƚĞƐƚŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ĨĞĚĞƌĂůůǇ ĨƵŶĚĞĚ ĂŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ ƐŽƵŶĚ ŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚĂŶĚͬŽƌŵĂŶĂŐĞĚŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŶŽŝƐĞĂŶĂůǇƐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗
x
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŶŽŝƐĞĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƐĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐĂŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͕ƌĂŝů͕ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů͕ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĨŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐ
YͬE
WĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘DĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞƐĞƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ
ŚĂǀĞŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚĐŽŶƚƌŽǀĞƌƐŝĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƉƵďůŝĐŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚŝŶƚŚĞĂŐĞŶĐǇƌĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘ x ŝƌĐƌĂĨƚ ŶŽŝƐĞ ĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ŶŽŝƐĞ ĞǆƉŽƐƵƌĞ ŵĂƉƐĂŶĚ ƐƵŵŵĂƌǇ ƌĞƉŽƌƚƐ ĨŽƌ >ĂƐ sĞŐĂƐDĐĂƌƌĂŶĂŶĚZĞŶŽͲdĂŚŽĞ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝƌƉŽƌƚƐ͘
x &ĞĚĞƌĂůůǇĨƵŶĚĞĚƐĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚͬŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůƐŽƵŶĚŝŶƐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĨŽƌ>ŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐ͕ ZĞŶŽͲdĂŚŽĞ͕WŚŽĞŶŝǆ^ŬǇ,ĂƌďŽƌĂŶĚŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞdĞĚ^ƚĞǀĞŶƐ/ŶƚĞƌŶĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝƌƉŽƌƚƐ͘ x 'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶEŽŝƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘
x ĐŽƵƐƚŝĐĂůĂŶĂůǇƐĞƐĂŶĚŶŽŝƐĞŵŽŶŝƚŽƌŝŶŐĨŽƌŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐŵŝŶŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘

3URIHVVLRQDO$IILOLDWLRQV

x DĞŵďĞƌ͕/ŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞŽĨEŽŝƐĞŽŶƚƌŽů
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͘
x DĞŵďĞƌ͕ĐŽƵƐƚŝĐĂů^ŽĐŝĞƚǇŽĨŵĞƌŝĐĂ͘

6RIWZDUH6NLOOVDQG&HUWLILFDWLRQV

x &,tdƌĂĨĨŝĐEŽŝƐĞDŽĚĞůĞƌƚŝĨŝĞĚ
x &/ŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚEŽŝƐĞDŽĚĞů;/EDͿ
x ǀŝĂƚŝŽŶ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĞƐŝŐŶdŽŽů;
dϮͿ
x >ĂƌƐŽŶĂǀŝƐ>ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌŝĞƐ͕ƵƚŽ͕DŝĐƌŽƐŽĨƚtŽƌĚ͕DŝĐƌŽƐŽĨƚ ǆĐĞů͕^ŽƵŶĚW>E
x ^ŽƵŶĚW>E^ŽĨƚǁĂƌĞΘEŽŝƐĞDŽĚĞůŝŶŐ^ĞŵŝŶĂƌ

(GXFDWLRQ

x ͘͘WŚǇƐŝĐĂůͬ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů'ĞŽŐƌĂƉŚǇ͕,ƵŵďŽůĚƚ^ƚĂƚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇ͕ϭϵϵϵ͘ x WŽƐƚ'ƌĂĚƵĂƚĞƐƚƵĚŝĞƐŝŶ,ǇĚƌŽůŽŐǇ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚĂƚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇŚŝĐŽ͕ϭϵϵϵͲϮϬϬϮ͘

-#20)',,3%*-.%

Scott M. Hudlow
1405 Sutter Lane
Bakersfield, California 93309
(661) 834-9183 (work)
(661) 747-9931 (cell)
[email protected]

Education
The George Washington University
M.A. American Studies, 1993
Specialization in Archaeology
and Architectural History

University of California, Berkeley
B.A. Anthropology, 1987
B.A. History, 1987
Specialization in Archaeology
and Colonial History

Years Experience in Field 36 years

Public Service
3/94-3/02 Historic Preservation Commission. City of Bakersfield, Bakersfield, California 93301.

7/97-10/00 Newsletter Editor. California History Action, newsletter for the California Council for the Promotion of History (CCPH), also served on the executive board for 1998-2002. President of CCPH, 2002-2004.

9/97, 9/98, 8/2002 Taught children's archaeology classes at the Kern County Museum, 900 Chester Avenue, Bakersfield, California at the Lori Brock Children's Center.

Relevant Work Experience
11/1995-PresentOwner, Sole Proprietorship. Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates. 1405 Sutter Lane, Bakersfield California 93309. Operate small cultural resource management business. Manage contracts, respond to RFP's, bill clients, manage temporary employees. Conduct Phase I archaeological and architectural surveys for private and public clients; including the cultural resource survey, documentary photography, measured drawings, mapping of structures, filing of survey forms, historic research, assessing impact and writing reports.

Evaluated archaeological and architectural sites and properties in lieu of their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places in association with Section 106 and 110 requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act).
8/96-5/2012 Adjutant Faculty. Kern Community College District. Bakersfield College, Cerro Coso College, 1801 Panorama Drive, Bakersfield, California, 93305. Teach History 17A, Introduction to American History, History 17B, Modern American History, History 18, California History, and Anthropology 5, Introduction to North American Indians.

4/96-4/98 Archaeologist/Historian. Platinum International, Inc. Alexandria, Virginia. Conduct architectural and archaeological survey and cultural resource evaluations at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. This work included survey, documentary photography, measured drawings, mapping of structures, filing of survey forms, historic research, assessing impact, writing reports, and preparing Cultural Resource Management Plans and Programmatic Agreements. Evaluated properties in lieu of their eligibility for the NRHP in association with Section 106 and 110 requirements of the NHPA of 1966.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

11/95- Owner, Sole Proprietorship. Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates. 1405 Sutter Lane, Bakersfield California 93309. Operate small cultural resource management business. Manage contracts, respond to RFP's, bill clients, manage temporary employees. Conduct Phase I, Phase II and Phase III architectural and archaeological surveys, evaluations, and mitigation projects for private and public clients; including the survey, documentary photography, measured drawings, mapping of structures, filing of survey forms, historic research, assessing impact and writing reports. Evaluated properties in lieu of their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places, (NRHP) in association with Sections 106 and 110 requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 and CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act). Prepare Cultural Resource Management Plans, Programmatic Agreements, and Deed Restrictions.

1/94-8/96 Project Lead/Architectural Historian/Archaeologist. Computer Sciences Corporation, P. O. Box 446, Edwards AFB, California 93523. Manage Legacy and Section 106 projects for the United States Air Force, which have architectural, historical, archaeological, and oral history components. Conduct Phase I archaeological and architectural surveys and Phase II architectural and archaeological evaluations; including the survey, documentary photography, measured drawings, mapping of structures, filing of survey forms, historic research, assessing impact and writing reports. Evaluated resources in lieu of their eligibility for the NRHP in association with Section 106 and 110 requirements of the NHPA of 1966. Prepare Technical Data Exchanges in support of Air Force Environmental Impact Analysis Process Program. Managed Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) subcontracts for the mitigation of a facility closure project and managed three HAER documentation programs. Coordinated project with Air Force, state, and other federal officials. Wrote the HAER histories.

2/93-8/93 Architectural Historian . Preservation Technologies, Inc. Roanoke, Virginia 24019. Conducted a county- wide comprehensive architectural survey of Shenandoah County, Virginia for the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. Tasks included conducting the architectural survey, photographing the buildings, field drawing of the buildings, filing of survey forms, and coordinating with county and state officials. Data entry for the survey forms was performed using IPS (Integrated Preservation Software). Properties were evaluated in lieu of their eligibility for the NRHP.

3/91-9/93 Architectural Historian/Archaeologist. William and Mary Center for Archaeological Research, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185. Conducted Phase I architectural and archaeological surveys and Phase II architectural evaluations; including architectural and archaeological survey, documentary photography, measured drawings, mapping of structures, filing of survey forms, historic research, assessing impact, and writing reports. Evaluated properties in lieu of their eligibility for the NRHP, in association with Sections 106 and 110 requirements of the NHPA of 1966.

6/90-2/91 Field Archaeologist/Assistant Historian. Louis Berger and Associates, 100 Halsted St. East Orange, New Jersey 07019. Conducted archival, bibliographic, and historical research in county courthouses, Library of Congress, local, state, and federal archives. Provided contextual historical documentation for architectural and archaeological reports. Wrote internal memorandums to project directors and principal investigators.

Participated in Phase I archaeological and architectural surveys, Phase II archaeological evaluations, and Phase III mitigation excavations of historic and prehistoric archaeological sites. Tasks performed include:
archaeological survey, evaluation, excavation, mapping, and on-site interpretation.

Cultural Resource Experience
1/88-9/88 Researcher/Photographer's Assistant . California Indian Project, Lowie Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California. Conducted bibliographic research in support of grant proposals.

Handled, catalogued, and photographed ethnographic objects, including baskets, beadwork, furs, featherwork, etc.

1/86-12/87 Archaeological Laboratory Assistant . Lowie Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California. Cleaned, catalogued, and analyzed seventeenth-, eighteenth-, and nineteenth-century artifacts. Analysis performed included: pipe stem dating, mean ceramic dating, and plotted seriation curves.

-#20)',,3%*-.%

6/86; 6/87 Field Archaeologist . Flowerdew Hundred Foundation, Prince George County, Virginia. Participated in intensive archaeological excavations of historic archaeological sites at Flowerdew Hundred, Prince George County, Virginia.

Professional Organizations
California Council for the Promotion of History
California Preservation Foundation
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Organization of American Historians
Society for California Archaeology

Society of Historical Archaeology

-#20)',,3%*-.%

113 N. Church St. Suite #310 | Visalia, CA 93291 | 559.840.4414 | www.candbplanning.com

To: David Densley and Nadia Salinas
From: Travis Crawford, AICP
Date: 1/16/25
Subject: Fresno On-Call Environmenta l Cost Estimates for Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.

Below are estimated ranges of costs and timefr ames for specific environmental documents.

Costs can vary widely depending on the parameters of a project, so a range of costs is provided.

Also provided on the second page is Crawford & Bowen’s current rate sheet.

Document Type Estimated Cost Range Estimated Timeframe
for Administrative Draft
Employee Positions
Involved
Categorical Exemption $450 - $750 2 weeks Principal Planner Notice of Exemption $450 - $750 2 weeks Principal Planner Notice of Preparation $450 - $1,200 2-4 weeks Principal Planner Initial Study $9,500 - $22,000* 8 – 16 weeks Principal / Assoc.

Planner
Negative Declaration $9,500 - $22,000* 8 – 16 weeks Principal / Assoc.

Planner
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
$9,500 - $50,000* 8 – 16 weeks Principal / Assoc.

Planner
Addendum $1,200 - $3,600 2 – 4 weeks Principal Planner
Environmental Impact
Report
$25,000 - $100,000* 14 – 24 weeks Principal / Assoc.

Planner
Environmental
Assessments
$8,500 - $22,000*

8 – 16 weeks Principal / Assoc.

Planner
Related Typical Technical
Studies
Air: $6,000 - $15,000**
Bio: $6,000 - $20,000**
Cult: $4,500 - $30,000**
Noi: $5,000 - $10,000**
Traf: $7,500 - $80,000**

Notice of Completion $150 - $300 1 week Principal Planner * Costs depend on the complexity and parameters of the project. Costs may increase depending on the nature of the project. The range provided assume s no technical studies within the cost estimate.

Technical studies will be added to the cost.
** Costs of technical studies will depend on the project. An estimated range is provided. -#20)',,3%*-.%

Re: Fresno SOQ Cost Estimate
January 16, 2025

Page | 2
Rate Sheet:

Title Name
Hourly
Rate
Principal Environmental
Planner Travis Crawford, AICP $150
Principal Environmental
Planner Emily Bowen, LEED AP $150
Associate Planner $105
Administrative/Document
Creation $90
Expenses
Subconsultants Cost + 10%
Mileage $0.67/mile (or current IRS amount)
Printing Cost + 10% at print shop
Shipping/Mailing Cost + 10% at UPS, FedEx or USPS
-#20)',,3%*-.%

%$

(QWLW\'HWDLOV
&RUSRUDWLRQ1DPH &5$:)25' %2:(13/$11,1*,1&
(QWLW\1R
)RUPHG,Q &$/,)251,$
6WUHHW$GGUHVVRI3ULQFLSDO2IILFHRI&RUSRUDWLRQ
3ULQFLSDO$GGUHVV 1&+85&+675((768,7(
9,6$/,$&$

0DLOLQJ$GGUHVVRI&RUSRUDWLRQ
0DLOLQJ$GGUHVV 1&+85&+675((768,7(
9,6$/,$&$

$WWHQWLRQ
6WUHHW$GGUHVVRI&DOLIRUQLD2IILFHRI&RUSRUDWLRQ
6WUHHW$GGUHVVRI&DOLIRUQLD2IILFH 1&+85&+675((7 68,7( 9,6$/,$&$

2IILFHUV
2IILFHU1DPH 2IILFHU$GGUHVV 3RVLWLRQ
V

ȗ 75$9,6/((&5$:)25' 1&+85&+675((7 68,7(
9,6$/,$&$

&KLHI([HFXWLYH2IILFHU 6HFUHWDU\
ȗ (PLO\%RZHQ 1&+85&+675((768,7(
9,6$/,$&$

&KLHI)LQDQFLDO2IILFHU
$GGLWLRQDO2IILFHUV
2IILFHU1DPH 2IILFHU$GGUHVV 3RVLWLRQ 6WDWHG3RVLWLRQ
1RQH(QWHUHG
'LUHFWRUV
7KHQXPEHURIYDFDQFLHVRQ%RDUGRI'LUHFWRUVLV

'LUHFWRU1DPH 'LUHFWRU$GGUHVV
ȗ (PLO\%RZHQ 1&+85&+675((768,7(
9,6$/,$&$

ȗ 7UDYLV/HH&UDZIRUG 1&+85&+675((7 68,7(
9,6$/,$&$

$JHQWIRU6HUYLFHRI3URFHVV
$JHQW1DPH (0,/<%2:(1
$JHQW$GGUHVV 1&+85&+675((768,7(
9,6$/,$&$

7\SHRI%XVLQHVV
7\SHRI%XVLQHVV &2168/7,1*
(PDLO1RWLILFDWLRQV
2SWLQ(PDLO1RWLILFDWLRQV <HV,RSWLQWRUHFHLYHHQWLW\QRWLI LFDWLRQVYLDHPDLO /DERU-XGJPHQW
67$7(2)&$/,)251,$
2IILFHRIWKH6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
67$7(0(172),1)250$7,21
&25325$7,21
&DOLIRUQLD6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWH
WK6WUHHW
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD

B2558-6670 03/05/2024 3:33 PM Received by California Secretary of State

Page 1 of 2 ends

Fresno City CouncilOctober 30, 2025

Fresno City Council
October 30, 2025