Exhibit I
March 17, 2026
Valeria Ramirez
City of Fresno
Planning and Development Department
2600 Fresno Street, Third Floor, Room 3043
Fresno, CA, 93721
Project: Rezone Application P26-00729
District CEQA Reference No: 20260268
Dear Ms. Ramirez:
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Rezone Application (RA) from the City of Fresno for the rezone project. Per the RA, the project consists of removing a condition of zoning that limited the development of the project site to 152 dwelling units (Project). The rezone will allow for future residential development. The Project is located 251 E. Barstow Avenue in Fresno, CA.
The District offers the following comments at this time regarding the Project:
Project Related Emissions
At the federal level under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the District is designated as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standards and serious nonattainment for the particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) standards. At the state level under California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), the District is designated as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 standards.
The rezone of land will not have an impact on air quality. However, if approved, future development projects will contribute to the overall decline in air quality due to construction activities, increased traffic, and ongoing operational emissions.
Construction Emissions
For future development projects, the District recommends, to reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the projects should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 2 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
Operational Emissions
For future development projects, operational (ongoing) air emissions from mobile sources and stationary sources should be analyzed separately. For reference, the District’s significance thresholds are identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.
Recommended Mitigation Measure: At a minimum, project related impacts on air quality should be reduced to levels below the District’s significance thresholds through incorporation of design elements such as the use of cleaner Heavy Heavy-Duty (HHD) trucks and vehicles, measures that reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTs), and measures that increase energy efficiency. More information on transportation mitigation measures can be found at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/ob0pweru/clean-air-measures.pdf
Recommended Model for Quantifying Air Emissions
Future development projects criteria pollutant emissions from construction and operational sources should be identified and quantified. Emissions analysis should be performed using the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod), which uses the most recent CARB-approved version of relevant emissions models and emission factors. CalEEMod is available to the public and can be downloaded from the CalEEMod website at: www.caleemod.com.
Health Risk Screening/Assessment
For future development projects, the City should evaluate the risk associated with a project for sensitive receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) in the area and mitigate any potentially significant risk to help limit exposure of sensitive receptors to emissions.
To determine potential health impacts on surrounding receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) a Prioritization and/or a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be performed for a project. These health risk determinations should quantify and characterize potential Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Air Resources Board (OEHHA/CARB) that pose a present or potential hazard to human health.
Health risk analyses should include all potential air emissions from a project, which include emissions from construction, including multi-year construction, as well as ongoing operational activities of the project. Note, two common sources of TACs can be attributed to diesel exhaust emitted from heavy-duty off-road earth moving equipment during construction, and from ongoing operation of heavy-duty on-road San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 3 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
trucks.
Prioritization (Screening Health Risk Assessment):
A “Prioritization” is the recommended method for a conservative screening-level health risk assessment. The Prioritization should be performed using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) methodology. Please contact the District for assistance with performing a Prioritization analysis.
The District recommends that a more refined analysis, in the form of an HRA, be performed for any project resulting in a Prioritization score of 10 or greater. This is because the prioritization results are a conservative health risk representation, while the detailed HRA provides a more accurate health risk evaluation.
Health Risk Assessment:
Prior to performing an HRA, it is strongly recommended that land use agencies/ project proponents develop and submit for District review a health risk modeling protocol that outlines the sources and methodologies that will be used to perform the HRA.
A development project would be considered to have a potentially significant health risk if the HRA demonstrates that the health impacts would exceed the District’s established risk thresholds, which can be found here:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.
A project with a significant health risk would trigger all feasible mitigation measures.
The District strongly recommends that development projects that result in a significant health risk not be approved by the land use agency.
The District is available to review HRA protocols and analyses. For HRA submittals please provide the following information electronically to the District for review:
• HRA (AERMOD) modeling files
• HARP2 files
• Summary of emissions source locations, emissions rates, and emission factor calculations and methodologies.
For assistance, please contact the District’s Technical Services Department by:
• E-Mailing inquiries to: [email protected]
• Calling (559) 230-5900
Recommended Measure: Development projects resulting in TAC emissions should be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors to prevent the creation of a significant health risk in accordance to CARB's Air San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 4 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective located at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/resource-center/strategy- development/land-use-resources.
Ambient Air Quality Analysis
An Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA) uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emissions increases from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The District recommends an AAQA be performed for any future development projects that may be approved under implementation of the Project with emissions that exceed 100 pounds per day of any pollutant.
An AAQA uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emission increase from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambien Air Quality Standards. An acceptable analysis would include emissions from both project- specific permitted and non-permitted equipment and activities. The District recommends consultation with District staff to determine the appropriate model and input data to use in the analysis.
Specific information for assessing significance, including screening tools and modeling guidance, is available online at the District’s website:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.
Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement
Future development projects could have a significant impact on air quality. The District recommends environmental reviews include a feasibility discussion on implementing a Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement (VERA) as a mitigation measure for projects that are determined to exceed the District’s CEQA significance thresholds.
A VERA is a mitigation measure by which the project proponent provides pound-for- pound mitigation of emissions increases through a process that develops, funds, and implements emission reduction projects, with the District serving a role of administrator of the emissions reduction projects and verifier of the successful mitigation effort. To implement a VERA, the project proponent and the District enter into a contractual agreement in which the project proponent agrees to mitigate project specific emissions by providing funds for the District’s incentives programs.
The funds are disbursed by the District in the form of grants for projects that achieve emission reductions. Thus, project-related impacts on air quality can be mitigated.
Types of emission reduction projects that have been funded in the past include electrification of stationary internal combustion engines (such as agricultural irrigation pumps), replacing old heavy-duty trucks with new, cleaner, more efficient heavy-duty trucks, and replacement of agricultural equipment with the latest San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 5 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
generation technologies.
In implementing a VERA, the District verifies the actual emission reductions that have been achieved as a result of completed grant contracts, monitors the emission reduction projects, and ensures the enforceability of achieved reductions. After the project is mitigated, the District certifies to the Lead Agency that the mitigation is completed, providing the Lead Agency with an enforceable mitigation measure demonstrating that project-related emissions have been mitigated. To assist the Lead Agency and project proponent in ensuring that the environmental document is compliant with CEQA, the District recommends the environmental document includes an assessment of the feasibility of implementing a VERA.
Vegetative Barriers and Urban Greening
For future development projects within the project area, and at strategic locations throughout the Project area in general, the District suggests the City consider incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools, healthcare facilities).
While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, vegetative barriers have been shown to be an additional measure to potentially reduce a population’s exposure to air pollution through the interception of airborne particles and the update of gaseous pollutants. Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.
Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment in the Community
Since the future development project may consist of residential development, gas- powered residential lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits.
The District recommends the project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment. More information on the District CGYM program and funding can be found at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/grants/clean-green-yard-machines-residential/.
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 6 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
On-Site Solar Deployment
It is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zero- carbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The District suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for future development projects that may be approved under implementation of the Project.
District Rules and Regulations
The District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes.
The list of rules below is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. Current District rules can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/rules-and-planning/current-district-rules- and-regulations. To identify other District rules or regulations that apply to future projects, or to obtain information about District permit requirements, the project proponents are strongly encouraged to contact the District’s Small Business Assistance (SBA) Office at (559) 230-5888.
District Rules 2010 and 2201 - Air Quality Permitting for Stationary Sources
Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using Best Available Control Technology (BACT).
Future development projects may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, project proponents shall San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 7 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
obtain an ATC permit from the District for equipment/activities subject to District permitting requirements.
Recommended Mitigation Measure: For projects subject to permitting by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, demonstration of compliance with District Rule 2201 (obtain ATC permit from the District) shall be provided to the City before issuance of the first building permit.
For further information or assistance, project proponents may contact the District’s SBA Office at (559) 230-5888.
District Rule 9510 - Indirect Source Review (ISR)
Future development projects within the project area may be subject to District Rule 9510 if upon full buildout, the project would equal or exceed any of the following applicability thresholds, depending on the type of development and public agency approval mechanism:
Table 1: ISR Applicability Thresholds
Development
Type
Discretionary
Approval Threshold
Ministerial Approval /
Allowed Use / By Right
Thresholds
Residential 50 dwelling units 250 dwelling units
Commercial 2,000 square feet 10,000 square feet
Light Industrial 25,000 square feet 125,000 square feet Heavy Industrial 100,000 square feet 500,000 square feet Medical Office 20,000 square feet 100,000 square feet
General Office 39,000 square feet 195,000 square feet
Educational Office 9,000 square feet 45,000 square feet Government 10,00 square feet 50,000 square feet
Recreational 20,000 square feet 100,000 square feet
Other 9,000 square feet 45,000 square feet
District Rule 9510 also applies to any transportation or transit development projects where construction exhaust emissions equal or exceed two tons of NOx or two tons of PM.
The purpose of District Rule 9510 is to reduce the growth in both NOx and PM emissions associated with development and transportation projects from mobile and area sources; specifically, the emissions associated with the construction and subsequent operation of development projects. The Rule requires developers to mitigate their NOx and PM emissions by incorporating clean air design elements into their projects. Should the proposed development project San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 8 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
clean air design elements be insufficient to meet the required emission reductions, developers must pay a fee that ultimately funds incentive projects to achieve off-site emissions reductions.
In the case the individual development project is subject to District Rule 9510, per Section 5.0 of the rule, an Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application is required to be submitted no later than applying for project-level approval from a public agency so that proper mitigation and clean air design under ISR can be incorporated into the public agency’s analysis.
Information about how to comply with District Rule 9510 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview
The AIA application form can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview/forms- and-applications/
District staff is available to provide assistance in determining if future development projects will be subject to Rule 9510, and can be reached by phone at (559) 230-5900 or by email at [email protected].
District Rule 9410 (Employer Based Trip Reduction)
Future development projects may be subject to District Rule 9410 (Employer Based Trip Reduction) if the project would result in employment of 100 or more “eligible” employees. District Rule 9410 requires employers with 100 or more “eligible” employees at a worksite to establish an Employer Trip Reduction Implementation Plan (eTRIP) that encourages employees to reduce single- occupancy vehicle trips, thus reducing pollutant emissions associated with work commutes. Under an eTRIP plan, employers have the flexibility to select the options that work best for their worksites and their employees.
Information about District Rule 9410 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/rule-9410-employer-based-trip-reduction/.
For additional information, you can contact the District by phone at 559-230- 6000 or by e-mail at [email protected]
District Rule 4002 (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)
Future development projects will be subject to District Rule 4002 since the Project will include demolition, renovation, and removal of existing structures.
To protect the public from uncontrolled emissions of asbestos, this rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 9 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
is demolished or renovated. Any asbestos present must be handled in accordance with established work practice standards and disposal requirements.
Information on how to comply with District Rule 4002 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/demolition-renovation/.
District Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings)
Future development projects may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it may utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs. The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings. In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements. Additional information on how to comply with District Rule 4601 requirements can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/tkgjeusd/rule-4601.pdf
District Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)
Future development projects may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving activities as described in Regulation VIII, specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities.
Should the future development project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5-acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). For additional information regarding the written notification or Dust Control Plan requirements, please contact District Compliance staff at (559) 230-5950.
The application for both the Construction Notification and Dust Control Plan can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/fm3jrbsq/dcp-form.docx
Information about District Regulation VIII can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/dustcontrol
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 10 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
District Rule 4901 - Wood Burning Fireplaces and Heaters
The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from wood burning fireplaces, wood burning heaters, and outdoor wood burning devices. This rule establishes limitations on the installation of new wood burning fireplaces and wood burning heaters.
Specifically, at elevations below 3,000 feet in areas with natural gas service, no person shall install a wood burning fireplace, low mass fireplace, masonry heater, or wood burning heater.
Information about District Rule 4901 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/residential-wood-smoke-reduction- program/
Other District Rules and Regulations
Future development projects may also be subject to the following District rules:
Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).
Future Projects / Land Use Agency Referral Documents
Future development projects may require an environmental review and air emissions mitigation. A project’s referral documents and environmental review documents provided to the District for review should include a project summary, the land use designation, project size, air emissions quantifications and impacts, and proximity to sensitive receptors and existing emission sources, and air emissions mitigation measures. For reference and guidance, more information can be found in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 11 of 11 District Reference No: 20260268
March 17, 2026
District Comment Letter
The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.
If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Eric McLaughlin by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (559) 230-5808.
Sincerely,
Mark Montelongo
Director of Policy and Government Affairs
For: Daniel Martinez
Program Manager
April 7, 2026
Valeria Ramirez
Planner II, City of Fresno
Planning and Development Department
2600 Fresno Street | Fresno CA 93721
SUBJECT: ALUC Consistency Determination Result for Rezone Application No. P26-00729
Dear Ms. Ramirez,
This letter serves as confirmation that at the April 6, 2026, Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission meeting, the Commission approved a Finding of Consistency for Rezone Application No. P26-00729 with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP).
The referenced site is located within the Airport Influence Area (AIA) of Fresno Yosemite International Airport, specifically within the Precision Approach Zone 7 (PAZ). Within this zone, there are no density or intensity limitations. The project site is also located within the 60 dB CNEL noise contour under the Airport’s 2022 Noise Exposure Map, where residential uses are permitted subject to compatibility considerations.
No physical development is proposed as part of this application. As such, the project does not introduce new development or intensification of land use, and applicable safety criteria are not triggered at this time.
This Finding of Consistency is conditioned upon the requirement that any future development proposal for the site be subject to review by the Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission prior to construction.
Any future development on the site shall also be required to comply with all applicable ALUCP safety, height, airspace protection, and noise compatibility standards, including applicable interior noise level requirements as identified in the ALUCP.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Rachel Hellett
Rachel Hellett
Staff, Fresno County Airport Land Use Commission
Associate Regional Planner
Fresno Council of Governments
2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201, Fresno, CA 93721
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 31, 2026
TO: Valeria Ramirez – Planner II
Planning & Development Department – Current Planning
FROM: JOHN MARTIN, Chief Engineering Technician
Department of Public Utilities – Utilities Planning & Engineering SUBJECT: DPU CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR P2 6-00729 – DEV REZONE APPLICATION – APN 418-060-52
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Water Service. The application for removal of existing conditions of zoning does not currently impact water facilities fronting the project. Conditions for water services will be provided as part of future development applications.
2. Sewer Service. The application for removal of existing conditions of zoning does not currently impact sewer facilities fronting the project. Conditions for sewer services will be provided as part of future development applications.
3. Solid Waste Service. The application for removal of existing conditions of zoning does not currently impact solid waste service for the project. Conditions for solid waste services will be provided as part of future development applications.
4. Additional Information Needed. The applicant shall provide additional information and revisions as indicated on the attached planning application site plan review.
Attachments: P26-00729 Site Plan (Stamped 03/12/2026)
&
2600 Fresno Street
Fresno, California 93721-3604
www.fresno.gov
Fire Department
April 2, 2026
Steven R. Robinson
Comments
Approved as submitted. Approval of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from applicable adopted codes and adopted standards. Final approval is subject to field inspection.
This project was reviewed by the Fire Department only for requirements related to water supply, fire hydrants, and fire apparatus access to the building(s) on site.
Review for compliance with fire and life safety requirements for the building interior and its intended use are reviewed by both the Fire Department and the Building and Safety Section of the Planning & Development Department when a submittal for building plan review is made as required by the California Building Code by the architect or engineer of record for the building.
&
2600 Fresno Street
Fresno, California 93721-3604
www.fresno.gov
Fresno County Health Department
April 2, 2026
Public Health
Comments
As a measure to protect ground water, all water wells and/or septic systems that exist or have been abandoned within the project area should be properly destroyed by an appropriately licensed contractor.
Should any underground storage tank(s) be found during the project, the applicant shall apply for and secure an Underground Storage Tank Removal Permit from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division.
Contact the Fresno Co unty Hazmat Compliance Program at (559) 600- 3271 for more information.
Proposed project has the potential to expose neighboring residents to elevated noise levels; consideration should be given to Noise Ordinance of the City of Fresno.
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Capturing Stormwater since 1956
k:\letters\rezone letters\fresno\2026\26-00729(l)(de).docx 5469 E. Olive Avenue • Fresno, CA 93727 • (559) 456-3292 • FAX (559) 456-3194 www.fresnofloodcontrol.org
File 210.414 “2026-00729”
310. “L”
April 7, 2026
Ms. Valeria Ramirez, Planner
City of Fresno, Planning & Development Department
2600 Fresno Street, Third Floor
Fresno, CA 93721-3604
Dear Ms. Ramirez,
Rezone Application No. P26-00729
Drainage Area “L”
The proposed rezone lies within the District’s Drainage Area “L”. Based on information submitted at this time, the District’s system can accommodate the proposed rezone.
If there are any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact the District.
Sincerely,
David Everitt
Engineering Technician I
DE/lrl
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Morgan Bunone
Land Management
300 Lakeside Dr
Oakland, CA 94612
March 25, 2026
Valeria Ramirez
City of Fresno – Planning and Development Department
2600 Fresno St, Third Floor
Fresno, CA 93721
Re: P26-00729 Rezone Application
251 E Barstow Ave, Fresno, CA
Dear Valeria:
Thank you for providing PG&E with the opportunity to review the proposed plans for P26-00729 Rezone Application stamped by City of Fresno on 3/12/2026 and received on 3/12/2026. Our review indicates the proposed rezoning does not appear to directly interfere with any of PG&E’s existing facilities or land rights.
Please note, this is our preliminary review and PG&E may provide additional comments in the future as the project progresses or if additional information is provided. If there are subsequent modifications made to the design, we ask that the plans be resubmitted for review to the email address listed below.
If PG&E gas and/or electric service are needed, please submit an application through PG&E’s Your Project Portal: Sign In (yourprojects-pge.com).
As a reminder, before any digging or excavation occurs, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) by dialing 811 a minimum of two (2) working days prior to commencing any work.
This free and independent service will ensure that all existing underground utilities are identified and marked on-site.
If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me at (925) 459-4787 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Morgan Bunone
Morgan Bunone
Land Management