4.17 Transportation
This section is based on the Pines at Sunrise Village Traffic Impact Analysis (EPD Solutions, 2021) and the City’s Transportation Assessment Policies and Procedures (TAPP) Worksheet which are included in Appendix I: Traffic Impact Analysis and Appendix J: TAPP Worksheet, respectively.
Environmental Issue
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycles, and
pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)? X
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (for example, farm equipment)?
X
d ) Result in inadequate emergency access? X
Site Access
Regional access to the site is provided via SR-91 to the north, SR -57 to the east, and SR -39 (Beach Boulevard) to the west.
Rosecrans Avenue is a four-lane undivided roadway to the north of the Project site. In the Project area, Rosecrans Avenue is signalized at its intersection with Euclid Street intersection to the east and Parks Road to the west. No street parking is permitted. The speed limit is 45 miles per hour (mph). Rosecrans Avenue is classified as a Primary Arterial Highway in The Fullerton Plan, Mobility Element.
Euclid Street is a four-lane undivided roadway to the east of the Project site. In the Project area, Euclid Street is signalized at its intersection with Rosecrans Avenue to the north and Bastanchury Road to the south. No street parking is permitted . The speed limit is 40 mph. Euclid Street is classified as a Major Arterial Highway in The Fullerton Plan, Mobility Element.
Paseo Dorado is a two -lane undivided roadway to the south of the Project site . Paseo Dorado is unsignalized at its intersection with Euclid Street to the east. On street parking is permitted. The speed limit is 25 mph. Paseo Dorado is classified as a Residential Street in The Fullerton Plan, Mobility Element.
Transit Service
Public transit service in the Project vicinity is provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Specifically, OCTA Route 37 serves the Project site. South-bound bus stops are located along the west side of Euclid Street at the Rosecrans Avenue and Paseo Dorado intersection s. North-bound bus stops are located along the east side of Euclid Street, sou th of Rosecrans Avenue. OCTA Route 37 runs seven days a week between the Cities of La Habra and Fountain Valley. Line 37 operates on weekdays The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
from approximately 5:20 a.m. to 9:30 PM, with 20-minute to 1 -hour headways (the time between bus arrivals); on Sat urdays from approximately 5:00 a.m. to 8:40 p.m. and on Sundays and holidays from approximately 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. with approximately 1-hour headways.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Pedestrian access within the Project site would be provided by sid ewalks and crosswalks. Existing pedestrian sidewalks along Rosecrans Avenue and Euclid Street would remain. According to The Fullerton Plan Appendix G (Bicycle Master Plan), there are no bicycle facilities on Euclid Street or Rosecrans Avenue within the Project vicinity. Additionally, no bicycle facilities are proposed in the Project vicinity. The nearest proposed bicycle facility is a Class 1 Bike Path is proposed near Bastanchury Road on the Union Pacific Right-of-Way, 0.3 mile south of the Project site.
4.17.1 IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.17a Would the p roject conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact.
Project Construction Trip Generation
Automobile and truck traffic volumes associated with project-related construction activities would vary throughout the construction phases, as different activities occur. However, project -related construction traffic would be temporary and cease upon Project completion.
Project Operations Trip Generation
Daily and peak hour trips were estimated for the proposed Project and displaced land use (i.e., school) based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition) trip rates for the following uses:
▪ Shopping Center,
▪ Single-Family Detached Housing, and
▪ Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise).
The proposed Project would demolish 108,300 SF of existing commercial structures and redevelop the site as a residential community with 49 single-family units and 115 multi-family townhome units. Existing uses have a vacancy rate of 45 percent. Consistent with recent case law (North County Advocates v. City of Carlsbad (2015)—Cal.App.4th—Case No. D066488), this trip generation analysis is based on 100 percent occupancy and includes these vacant use’s historical operational information in establishing the baseline for the Project’s transportation impact analysis. Table 4.17-1: Project Trip Generation indicates the Project site’s existing and proposed trip generation estimate based upon Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) trip generation rates.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
As seen in Table 4.17-1, the existing commercial uses generate approximately 4 ,637 average daily trips, including 99 AM peak hour trips and 247 PM. peak hour trips. The proposed Project would generate approximately 1,340 average daily trips on a typical weekday, including 92 AM peak hour trips and 116 PM peak hour trips. Project implementation would result in a reduction of 3,297 net average daily trips , including a reduction of 7 AM peak hour trips and 131 PM peak hour trips.47 Project implementation would change the character of uses on site from commercial to residential, resulting in a decrease of traffic volumes along roadways in the Project vicinity. Accordingly, the Project would not increase average daily trips along surrounding roadways and would be accommodated by the existing roadway infrastructure.
The Fullerton Plan Consistency – Mobility and Bicycle Elements As discussed above, the Project’s transportation network includes roadways, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and bus transit systems. The Fullerton Plan –Mobility Element discusses the City’s goal s to provide a balanced, multi-modal transportation network.
47 Total Net Project trip generation is Project trip generation minus the trips generated by the existing land uses on site.
Table 4.17-1: Project Trip Generation
Land Use
ITE
Code Unit
Trip Generation Rates
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Shopping Center1 820 TSF 37.75
Single-Family Detached
Housing2 210 DU 9.440 0.185 0.555 0.740 0.624 0.366 0.990 Multi-family Housing (Low-
Rise)3 220 DU 7.320 0.106 0.354 0.460 0.353 0.207 0.560 Land Use Quantity Unit
Trip Generation Estimates
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Existing Trip Generation
Shopping Center4 122.82 TSF 4,637 54 45 99 136 111 247
Project Trip Generation
Single-family Homes 52 DU 491 10 29 38 32 19 51
Townhomes 116 DU 849 12 41 53 41 24 65
Project Trip Generation 1,340 22 70 92 73 43 116
Total Net Trip Generation -3,297 -32 25 -7 -63 -68 -131 TSF = thousand square feet; DU = dwelling unit
1. Daily Trip rate from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. Land Use Code 820 - Shopping Center, Peak hour trips from traffic counts, adjusted with a 25 percent COVID factor.
2. Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. Land Use Code 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing.
3. Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. Land Use Code 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise).
4. Peak hour volumes were derived from counts taken at the Project driveways.
Source: EPD Solutions, Inc. (2021)
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
The proposed Project would provide additional housing opportunities closer to exist ing neighborhood- serving commercial areas and to existing OCTA bus transit routes . Landscaped pedestrian walkways throughout the site’s interior would provide pedestrian access from residential units to the adjacent commercial businesses and connections to the public sidewalks on Rosecrans Avenue, Euclid Street, and Paseo Dorado. Public sidewalk improvements would include replaced landscaping and tree grates would be installed in street tree wells to increase shade and walkability. Although there are no current or future planned bikeways within the Project’s immediate vicinity, the proposed Project would also not interfere with any future plans. . Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with the Ci ty’s Mobility or Bicycle Elements.
Public Transit
Project construction would be temporary in nature and would not result in any road closures. Public transit service would continue to operate during Project construction. Upon Project implementation, public transit bus service would continue to be provided by the OCTA, with bus routes along Euclid Street.
As noted above, the nearest transit stops (northbound and southbound) are located at the Euclid Street and Rosecrans Avenue intersection. A third bus stop is located at the Euclid Street and Paseo Dorado intersection, at the site’s southeastern corner. The proposed Project would not interfere with public transit operations and would further place residents close to public transit opportunities.
4.17b Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision(b)? Less Than Significant Impact. State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3 codifies the change f rom Level of Service to VMT as a metric for transportation impact analysis. Pursuant to SB 743, VMT analysis is the primary method for determining CEQA impacts. Jurisdictions were not required to adopt VMT as a significant impact determination until July 1, 2020. The City adopted Resolution No. 2020-468 which adopted a VMT baseline and thresholds of significance for purposes of analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA.
A land use project would result in a potentially significant project -generated VMT impact if either of the following thresholds are satisfied:
1. The project-generated average total daily VMT per service population in the baseline year exceeds the City of Fullerton General Plan Buildout average total daily VMT per service population calculated with Origin/Destination VMT.
2. The project-generated average total daily VMT per service population in the horizon year exceeds the City of Fullerton General Plan Buildout average total daily VMT per service population calculated with Origin / Destination VMT.
In anticipation of the change to VMT, Fullerton and six other north Orange County cities (La Habra, Brea, Buena Park, Orange, Placentia, and Yorba Linda) formed a collaborative and completed the North Orange County Cities (NOCC) SB 743 Implementation Study to assist with implementation , methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis. As part of this study, the collaborative developed NOCC+, a spreadsheet tool to he lp evaluate project -generated VMT impacts to determine which projects require further analysis and which are screened out because they can be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Although the tool was developed collaboratively, each City had the opportunity to determine and adopt the appropriate local CEQA thresholds of significance.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
The proposed Project was reviewed with Fullerton’s NOCC+. While the Project would not quality for any VMT screening criteria, the analysis showed the projected trip generation would result in a lower General Plan buildout level of VMT per service population. The Project VMT is shown in Table 4.17-2: Project VMT.
Table 4.17-2: Project Trip Generation
Estimated Daily Trips 1,498
Average Trip Length 8.6
Service Population 478
VMT/Service Population 27
Target VMT per Service Population Threshold 29.6
Percentage above/below VMT Target -8.78
Source: EPD Solutions, Inc. (2021)
As shown in Table 4.17-2, the proposed Project’s VMT per Service Population falls below the Target VMT per service population by 29.6 percent. Residential projects located within a low VMT area are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence. The p roposed Project replaces a n underutilized shopping center located in a predominantly residential area of the City. Future residents would likely exhibit similar travel behaviors as the existing surrounding residential neighborhoods, which currently exhibit a lower General Plan buildout level of VMT per service population. Despite not taking VMT credit from the existing shopping center, the proposed Project would likely not result in significant VMT. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with State CEQA Guidelines §15064.3(b). A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
4.17c Would the p roject s ubstantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. Primary vehicular access to the Project site would be provided by three driveways: one on Camino Loma, one on Rosecrans Avenue, and one on Euc lid Street. The 51-foot driveway access on Euclid Street would be two -way stop controlled and provide access to Lot 1. The 45- foot driveway on Rosecrans Avenue would be two -way stop controlled and provide access to Lot 2. The 45-foot driveway on Camino Loma would be stop controlled and similarly provide access to Lot 2. Internal drive aisles would accommodate standard fire lane turning radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers design for emergency vehicles and fire services ; see Exhibit 2-10: Fire Master Plan . The proposed Project driveway and internal circulation improvements would be constructed pursuant to City of Fullerton Fire Department standards. The Project proposes a residential development within a portion of the City that is predominantly residential. The Project does not include the use of any incompatible vehicles or equipment on the site, such as farm equipment. Furthermore, off-site street improvements prescribed in the Development Agreement would be limited to grind and overlay and co mplete removal and replacement of pavement. No Project component would increase hazards to the public due to incompatible use, as the residential uses proposed by the Project would be fully compatible with surrounding land uses. Therefore, such impacts are considered less than significant and no mitigation is required.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
4.17d Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. Emergency access is determined by the number of private and public access points, the width of the access point and internal roadways serving a project site. The proposed Project would provide access from Rosecrans Avenue and Euclid Street . The 2019 CBC Section 503 details requirements for Fire Apparatus Access Roads. As prescribed under Section 503.2.1, fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet, exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13.5 feet.
The proposed Project driveway entrances and interior drive aisles would accommodate standard fire lane turning radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers. As shown in Exhibit 2-10, the primary internal travel roadways would be 20 feet wide to accommodate fire apparatus requirements for fire truck access and turning radius. The 20-foot-wide alleys between townhome buildings would be within the 150-foot range of required for fire hose reach. The Fullerton Fire Department has reviewed the Project and specified access requirements concerning minimum roadway width, fire apparatus access roads, fire lanes, signage, access devices and gates, and access walkways, among other requirements, which would enhance emergency access to the Project site . Project plans would be reviewed by Fullerton Fire Department for final approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Co mpliance with the Fullerton Fire Department’s requirements would ensure impacts to emergency access would be less than significant .
Additionally, the Project off-site street improvements prescribed in the Development Agreement would not require the complete closure of any public or private streets or roadways during construction. The Project would be subject to SC TRANS-1, which requires that temporary construction activities not impede use of the surrounding roadways for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. Therefore, such impacts are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
Mitigation Program
Standard Conditions
SC TRANS-1 Prior to construction, future developers shall prepare a Traffic Control Plan for implementation during the construction phase, as deemed necessary by the City Traffic Engineer. The Plan may include the following provisions, among others:
• At least one unobstructed lane shall be maintained in both directions on surrounding roadways.
• At any time only a single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, signal carriers (i.e., flag persons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions.
• If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall provide appropriate signage indicating detours/alternative routes.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are required.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
This Section is based on the Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 Consultation initiated by the City of Fullerton. The documents for the initiation process are included in Appendix K: Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 Communications.
Environmental Issue
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code §21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code
§5020.1(k)?
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resources Code §5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code
§5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California
Native American tribe.
X
4.18.1 IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.18ai Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code §5020.1(k)?
4.18aii A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and suppo rted by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code §5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code §5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Chapter 532 Statutes of 2014 (i.e., AB 52) requires that lead agencies evaluate a project’s potential impact on “tribal cultural resources,” which include “sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources.” To help determine whether a project may have such an effect, the Public Resources Code requires a lead agency to consult with any California Native American tribe that requests consultation and is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project. That consultation must take place prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report for a project. (P RC §21080.3.1.). AB 52 also gives lead agencies the discretion to determine, based on substantial evidence, whether a resource qualifies as a “tribal cultural resource.”
Chapter 905 Statutes of 2004 (i.e., SB 18) requires local governments to consult with California Native American tribes prior to making certain planning decisions and to provide notice to tribes at certain key points in the planning process. These consultation and notice requirements apply to adoption and amendment of general plans and specific plans.
The City provided formal notification to California Native American tribal representatives identified by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Native American groups may have knowledge about cultural resources in the area and may have concerns about adverse effects from development on tribal cultural resources as defined in PRC §21074. The City has contacted the tribal representatives of the tribes noted below. Correspondence to and from tribal representatives is included a s Appendix K. SB 18 Native American Groups contacted are the same as the tribal contacts for AB 52, per the NAHC response letter. As of this Initial Study’s release date, the City has not received a request for consultation pursuant to AB 52 or SB 18.
▪ Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians
▪ Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians
▪ Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
▪ Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians ▪ Gabrielino /Tongva Nation
▪ Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council ▪ Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe
▪ Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation – Belardes ▪ La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians
▪ Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation
▪ Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians
▪ Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians
▪ Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
A Sacred Lands File request was submitted to the NAHC. The results were negative. It is unlikely that Native American tribal cultural resources are present on the Project site, given construction of the shopping center required site disturbance and excavation , and no archaeological resources have been recorded on the Project site. Notwithstanding, the potential exists for the discovery of archaeological or tribal cultural resources during ground disturbing activities. To address potential impacts during ground- disturbing activities, the proposed Project would be required to comply with SC CR-1 and CR-2 (see also The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
Section 4.5: Cultural Resources), which details the appropriate steps should archaeological/tribal cultural resources be enc ountered during ground -disturbing activities. Following compliance with SC CR-1 and CR-2, the Project’s potential impacts concerning archaeological resources would be less than significant.
Construction activities would include excavation and grading. Compliance with SC CR-1 and CR-2 would address potential impacts to tribal cultural resources. With implementation of SC CR-1 and CR-2, potential impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant.
Mitigation Program
Standard Conditions and Requirements
SC CR-1 and SC CR-2 are applicable to the proposed Project.
Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are applicable to the proposed Project.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
This Section is based on the Water and Sewer Assessment (Huitt-Zoliars, 2021) prepared for the proposed Project. The documents are included in Appendix L: Water and Sewer Assessment.
Environmental Issue
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
4.19.1 IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.19a Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
The following discusses the Project’s potential impacts on water, wastewater (conveyance and treatment), storm water drainage, electric po wer infrastructure, natural gas facilities, and telecommunications facilities and infrastructure.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
Water
Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Fullerton Public Works Department Water Division oversees the City’s water system, including upgrades and re pair to infrastructure, water conservation, and water quality. The 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) is a comprehensive document that evaluates a water supplier’s reliability over a long -term (20-25 year) horizon. UWMP water demand forecasts are based on adopted general plans. As discussed in Section 4.15, Population and Housing , the proposed Project would introduce 479 new residents to the area. The Project’s forecast population growth would incrementally increase the City’s existing population by 0 .34 percent, to a total of 139,905 persons. The Project’s water demand is shown in Table 4.19-1: Project Water Demand.
Table 4.19-1: Project Water Demand
Condition Water Demand (gpd) Maximum Daily Demand (gpd) Peak Hour Demand (gpm) Existing Conditions 50,080 100,160 139.11
Proposed Project 81,150 162,300 225.42
Net Change + 31,070 +62,140 +86.31
Source: Woodard & Curran, Inc. (May 2021). The Pines Sewer Capacity Assessment.
Although the proposed Project would increase water demand over existing conditions, the proposed onsite water system and infrastructure would be designed to accommodate for the increase d demand.
The 2020 UWMP forecasted its total water demand to be 23,799 AF in 2020.48 The proposed Project would demand up to 31,070 gallons per day over existing conditions, or 34.8 AF. Project implementation would account for less than one percent of current water demand of 23,799 AF in 2020.
Further, the Project’s forecast population growth of 474 persons would incrementally increase the City’s existing population by 0.34 percent but would not exceed the population increase projected by The Fullerton Plan or SCAG’s SCS/RTP. Although the proposed Project would require a General Plan Amendment, the forecasted population growth of 0.34 percent falls within the projections outlined in the SCAG RTP and The Fullerton Plan, and therefore would be consistent with the 2020 UWMP. The 2020 UWMP indicates that the City would meet the water demands through 2045. Therefore, the proposed Project would not require the construction of new or expanded water supply or treatment facilities.
Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Wastewater
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is within the City’s Sewer Maintenance District 2 and served by an existing 8-inch sewer line in Rosecrans Avenue with an 8-inch sewer lateral at the existing Rosecrans Avenue access driveway. The existing 8-inch sewer line in Rosecrans Avenue connects to a 10-inch line in Euclid Street. There are public sewer lines in Euclid Street and Paseo Dorado. The City of Fullerton 2009 Sewer Master Plan (Master Plan) identified system deficiencies concerning capacity and structural condition, and developed a 20 -year Cap ital Improvement Program (CIP) , which addresses these deficiencies. As part of the preparation and data modeling for the Master Plan, the City relied on previous modeling studies, rainfall and flow data from major wet weather events from 2005, and obtained data on
48 Arcadis. June 2021. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Table 6-8 Retail: Water Supplies — Actual, Available at:
https://www.cityoffullerton.com/home/showpublisheddocument/5052/637598829614070000, Accessed July 24, 2021.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
land use, population, and water consumption from various sources. The Master Plan identified capacity deficiencies in the sewer lines downstream of the Project site under existing and modeled wet weather flow conditions; see Master Plan Figure 5 -1. Specifically, the Master Plan identified the following three capital improvement projects to address the current and projected sewer line capacities:
• “Project 1B” would upsize the sewer line between manholes 71 -69 and 12 -41 from 15 -inch to 18-inch
• “Project 1C” would upsize the sewer line between manholes 10 -42 and 28 -42 from 15 -inch to 18-inch
• “Project 2” would upsize the sewer line between manholes 28 -69 and 71 -69 from 8 -inch to 10-inch.
A portion of the Project 2 improvements has been completed (from manhole 28-69 to manhole 56 -69).
However, Project 1B and Project 1C and the remaining section of Project 2 from manhole 56-69 to 71-69 have not been implemented.
Wastewater generation rates were based on an Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) unit flow factor of 75 gallons per capita per day, and an assumed average of 2.93 persons per dwelling unit based on the citywide average occupancy rate. Projected ADWF are provided in Table 4.19-2: Modeled Sewer Loads.
The Project would result in a net total ADWF increase of 22,280 gpd over existing conditions.
Table 4.19-2: Modeled Sewer Loads
Use Units Unit Flow Factor Average Dry Weather Flow (gpd) Project
Single-Family Residential 49 DU 220 gpd/DU 10,780
Townhome 115 DU 220 gpd/DU 25,300
Project Total 36,080
Existing Development 13,800
Net Project Increase 22,280
Note: As part of the 2009 Master Plan, sewer loads for the existing development on the Project site were estimated to be 13,800 gpd based on 2007/2008 water consumption data.
Source: Woodard & Curran, Inc. (May 2021). The Pines Sewer Capacity Assessment.
The Project would discharge wastewater flows into sewer mains in Euclid Street and Rosecrans Avenue using a gravity sewer system. The single-family residential units would discharge into an existing 10-inch sewer main in Euclid Street via a new lateral connection and sewer flows from the townhome units would connect and discharge into the existing 10-inch sewer main in Rosecrans Avenue; see Appendix L Figure 1.
The Project’s Sewer Capacity Assessment modeled existing and future 2035 conditions with the proposed Project flows to determine whether the Project would cause new capacity defic iencies, and to confirm that the Master Plan identified capacity improvement projects would alleviate the deficiencies inclusive of the proposed Project. As indicated in Table 4.19-2, the Project would result in a net total ADWF increase of 22,280 gpd over existing conditions, thus, would contribute to existing sewer capacity deficiencies .
Therefore, The Project applicant would be required to contribute a fair-share cost to the City for the Master Plan improvement projects for sewer capacity. As noted in Ap pendix L, f air-share costs are The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
calculated as a percentage of the cost of the total project and are based on the percent increase of flow under dry weather flow conditions that the development would add to the sewer system. Although the proposed Project wo uld result in a net increase in wastewater generation, it would not require construction of sewer infrastructure beyond that previously identified in the Master Plan. As noted above, the Master Plan previously identified deficiencies under existing and future wet weather conditions.
However, the Master Plan was overly conservative since the modeled flows relied on data from an extremely wet 2005 winter storm event. Further, the Master Plan did not factor other City modifications and improvements to the system outflows including fixing crack ed pipes and future system repairs. The City would impose as a condition of approval for the Applicant to pay the fair share contribution to the sewer improvements that would be eligible to go into a Community Facilities District for completion within three years of bond issuance. Therefore, Project impacts concerning wastewater would be considered less than significant, and no mitigation measure is required.
Storm Water Drainage Facilities
Less Than Significant Impact. See Threshold 4.10c concerning drainage patterns and stormwater drainage systems. As discussed in Threshold 4.10c, the Project proposes on -site drainage improvements. No off - site drainage improvements are proposed or required. The environmental impacts associated with the proposed drainage improvements are analyzed as a part of the overall Project analysis in this Initial Study.
As concluded in this Initial Study, following compliance with the established r egulatory framework, the proposed drainage improvements’ environmental effects would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
Electric Power, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications Facilities Less Than Significant Impact. Electrical power is provided by SCE and natural gas is provided by SoCalGas.
Telecommunications are provided by various companies. SCE, SoCalGas, and local telecommunications companies operate and maintain transmission and distribution infrastructure in the Project area, which currently serve the Project site. See Thresholds 4.6a and 4.6b in Section 4.6 Energy for further discussions concerning electricity and natural gas usage. The Project’s anticipated electricity demand would be approximately 918,543 kilowatt-hours per year (kWh/year) and anticipated natural gas demand would be approximately 3,293,690 KBTU/year. Telecommunications services are provided by Spectrum, Frontier, and AT&T. The Project site is served by existing telecommunication infrastructure. The various telecommunication providers would continue to provide service coverage to the proposed Project . The Project proposes to connect to existing electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure, and no off -site improvements are proposed or r equired. The environmental effects associated with the necessary on-site electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications improvements are analyzed as a part of the overall Project analysis in this Initial Study. As concluded in this Initial Study, following compliance with the established regulatory framework , the proposed utility improvements’ environmental effects would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
4.19b Would the p roject have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Fullerton is a retail water supplier and supplies water to the Project site. The 2020 UWMP indicates that water supplies would meet the water demands for normal, single-dry, and multiple dry -year conditions through 20 45. Population growth forecasts within adopted General Plans are factored into UWMP water demand forecasts The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City meets all of its water demand through a combination of imported water and local groundwater.
The City works together with two primary agencies, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD), to ensure water supply reliability. Groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin (Basin) a ccounts for approximately 79 percent of the City’s overall supply, followed by imported water at 21 percent. It is projected that by 2045, the water supply portfolio will change to approximately 85 percent groundwater and 15 percent imported water. If the City exceeds their groundwater allocation, a purchase agreement is in place with MET that allows purchase of supplemental imported water. The City maintains seven imported water connections to MET and six emergency interconnections with other utilities.
The OC Basin is not adjudicated and as such, pumping from the OC Basin is managed through a process that uses financial incentives to encourage groundwater producers to pump a sustainable amount of water. The framework for the financial incentives is based o n establishing the Basin Production Percentage (BPP), the percentage of each Producer’s total water supply that comes from groundwater pumped from the OC Basin. The BPP is set based on groundwater conditions, availability of imported water supplies, and OC Basin management objectives. OCWD has a policy to manage the groundwater basin within a sustainable range to avoid adverse impacts to the basin.
The 2020 UWMP forecasted its total water demand to be 27,850 AF by 2045. Additionally, the population is expected to increase from 141,648 persons in 2020 to 189,687 persons by 2045. In the case of a water supply shortage, the City has prepared a Water Shortage Contingency Plan to ensure adequate service.
The Project proposes a General Plan Revision to change the land use designation from Commercial to Low/Medium Density Residential. The Project’s forecast population growth is approximately 474 persons; see Threshold 4.14a. The Project’s proposed land uses would differ from the allowable land uses and associated water demands under the existing land use designations , which are the basis for the UWMP .
Therefore, the Project site’s forecast population growth would differ from the assumptions of the UWMP.
However, the proposed Project would result in a nominal increase in water demand, as compared to the site’s existing land uses/designations, which were assumed in the UWMP. Additionally, t he Project’s forecast population growth would nominally increase (approximately 0. 34 percent) the City’s existing population of approximately 139,431 persons.49 The City’s population with the proposed Project would be 139,905 persons, which would represent 2.5 percent of SCAG’s 2045 population forecast for the City of 158,300 persons. As such, following the City’s approval of the requested General Plan Revision, the Project would not conflict with or exceed SCAG’s regional growth forecasts for the City or conflict with the UWMP. As s uch, Project impacts concerning water demand would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
The proposed Project is located within the City of Fullerton Zone 2 water system. There is an existing 24-inch water line in Rosecrans Avenue, a 12-inch water line in Euclid Street, and an 8 -inch water line in Paseo Dorado. The Project would connect to the existing 24-inch lines in Rosecrans Avenue and 8-inch line in Euclid Street and loop a new public domestic water line within the internal streets to bring water service to the site . Proposed private domestic water line s would then connect to each residential unit from the public water loop line to provide water service. Additionally, a separate private fire line for fire hydrants and building sprinkler systems would be constructed. The proposed Project would have
49 Ibid.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
sufficient wa ter supplies available during normal, dry and multiple dry years . Impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is required.
4.19c Would the p roject result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. Wastewater collection facilities that serve the City are owned, operated, and maintained by the City of Fullerton Public Works Engineering Division. The City’s current wastewater system includes 330 miles of pipeline and 6,850 manholes. The City’s wastewater system discharges to several of the Orange County Sanitation District’s (OCSD) trunk lines. OCSD collects, treats, and disposes of and/or reclaims wastewater generated by residents in northwestern and central Orange County. OCSD has two operating facilities, Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2, located in the cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach , respectively . Through these facilities, OCSD collects, conveys, treats, and/or reclaims approximately 230 million gallons of wastewater generated daily in its service area including approximately 80 percent of the wastewater comes from residential uses and 20 percent comes from commercial and industrial u ses. Wastewater from the City is collected and treated at Treatment Plant No. 2. The estimated average daily effluent received at Plant No. 2 is 127 million gallons (mgd). This facility currently has a total primary treatment capacity of 168 mgd, with an average daily treatment of approximately 127 mgd. Therefore, there is approximately 41 mgd of excess primary tr eatment capacity at OCSD Plant No. 2. As discussed above, the proposed Project would result in a total increase in ADWF of 22,280 gpd. This represents a nominal increase in wastewater treatment demand at Treatment Plant No. 2. Further, prior to issuance of a sewer connection permit, the applicant would pay any required sewer connection and/or service fees to OCSD . Existing wastewater treatment capacity is sufficient to meet Project demand and P roject implementation would not require or result in the constru ction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. A less than significant impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
4.19d Would the project generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
4.19e Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. The City contracts with Republic Services to provide solid waste and recycling services. Solid waste generated in the City is disposed of at the Olinda Alpha Landfill located a t 1942 Valencia Avenue in the City of Brea. The maximum permitted throughput for the landfill is 8,000 tons/day and the maximum permitted capacity is 148,800,000 CY. The remaining capacity is approximately 34,200,000 CY.50
The Fullerton Plan EIR identifies a solid waste generation rate of 12.23 pounds per dwelling unit per day.
The proposed Project would generate approximately 2,005 pounds of solid waste per day. In 2010, the City disposed of approximately 283 ton s of waste per day at the Olinda Alpha Landf ill. Accordingly, the Project would represent a nominal increase of 0.03 percent in solid waste disposal.
50 CalRecycle. (2021). Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Facility Details – Olinda Alpha Landfill (30-AB-0035). Retrieved from https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2757?siteID=2093. Accessed on June 28, 2021.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
Regulations specifically applicable to the proposed Project include the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), and CalGreen Code §4.408, and AB 341, which requires multiple-family residential development and commercial uses to implement recycling programs. The Integrated Waste Management Act, which requires every city and county in the State to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) to its Solid Waste Management Plan, identifies how each jurisdiction will meet the State’s mandatory waste diversion goal of 50 percent by and aft er the year 2000. AB 341 increased the diversion goal to 75 percent by 2020.
The 2019 CalGreen Code §4.408 requires preparation of a Construction Waste Management Plan that outlines ways in which the contractor would recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris. During the construction phase, the Project would be required to comply with the CalGreen Code through the recycling and reuse of at least 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris from the Project site.
The proposed Project includes areas for separate solid waste and recycling bins within the garages for all of the 164 dwellings. A third bin space for green waste is provided for the 49 detached single -family residences.
Construction and operational activities would be required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local statutes and regulations for solid waste, including those identified under the most recent CALGreen Code. There is sufficient landfill capacity to serve the proposed Project, and the proposed Project would not conflict with solid waste reduction goals. The Project would result in a less than significant impact concerning solid waste and no mitigation is required.
Mitigation Program
Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures
No standard conditions or mitigation measures are required.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
4.20 Wildfire
Environmental Issue
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
X
d) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
X
4.20.1 IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.20a Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The CalFire Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map for the City of Fullerton does not depict the Project site in a State Responsibility Area. The Project site is in a Non-Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) zone within a local responsibility area.51 Project design and site access would adhere to the Fullerton Fire Department design and standards. Further, Project construction would not result in the complete closure of any public or private roadways during construction as noted in Threshold 4.17d. The use of nearby roadways for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles would not be impeded by temporary construction activities . Therefore, the Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
51 CalFire. (June, 2019). FHSZ Viewer. Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed June 2, 2021.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
4.20b Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
No Impact. The Project is not within an area classified as a VHFHSZ. The Project site and its surrounding areas are relatively flat, except for a slight slope that runs northwest to southeast across the site towards Euclid Street. The Project site is 1,000 feet south of the West Coyote Hills area , which is designated as a VHFHSZ.52 Project implementation would not involve off-site improvements or construction near the West Coyote Hills area. Project design would be subject to fire prevention measures and building standards outlined in FMC Chapter 13.20, which adopts the 2019 California Fire Code, thereby minimizing potential fire risks to people or structures associated with the Project. 53 Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
4.20c Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. As discussed above, the Project site is not within an area classified as a VHFHSZ. The Project site and surrounding areas are developed and urbanized . The Project would connect to existing utility infrastructure on Rosecrans Avenue and Euclid Street. Project implementation would not result in the new construction, installation, or maintenance of new infrastructure. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
4.20d Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No Impact. The Project is not within an area classified as a VHFHSZ. The Project site and surrounding vicinity are relatively flat. There are no known landslides near the site and the site is not in the path of any known or potential landslides. Therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Mitigation Program
Standard Conditions and Mitigation Measures
No standard conditions or mitigation measures are required.
52 CalFire. (June, 2019). FHSZ Viewer. Retrieved from https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. 53 FMC 13.20.10- The City of Fullerton does hereby adopt, by reference, the 2019 Edition of the California Fire Code, incorporating by reference the 2018 International Fire Code with California Amendments, as codified within Part 9, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also known as the California Building Standards Code, as amended by this Chapter, including Appendix Chapter 4, and Appendices B, BB, C, CC, D, E, F, G, I, K, M, N and O, but specifically excluding Appendices A, H, J and L, as amended, and the whole thereof, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted or amended by this chapter.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
4.22 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Environmental Issue
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Does the Project:
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
X
b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of the
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
X
c) Have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
4.22.1 IMPACT ANALYSIS
4.21a Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed throughout this Ini tial Study, the proposed Project does not have the potential to significantly degrade the quality of the environment or result in significant impacts to the environment that cannot be reduced to less than significant following compliance with the established regulatory framework (i.e., local, state, and federal regulations) and the recommended mitigation measures.
As concluded in Section 4.4, the Project would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popu lation to drop below self -sustaining levels, threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
As concluded in Section 4.5, the Project would not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. CHRIS records search and historic aerial imagery review did not indicate any historical buildings or resources within the Project site. The Project site’s existing commercial retail buildings and structures does not meet the criteria of “architecturally significant” or a “historic resource” under CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a change in the significance of a historical resource.
4.21b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would result in significant impacts unless mitigated for the following environmental issues: cultural resources, geology and soils , hazards and hazardous materials, and tribal cultural resources . Mitigation has been specified for each of these environmental issue areas to reduce impacts to less than significant. Other development projects within the City would be subject to compliance with the established regulatory framework , as applicable. All other Project impacts were determined either to have no impact or a less than significant impact following compliance with the established regulatory framework, without the need for mitigation. No cumulative impacts are anticipated in connection with this or other projects. Therefore, the proposed Project, in conjunction with other future projects, would not result in any cumulatively considerable impacts and no mitigation is required.
4.21c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in this Initial Study, there are no known substantial adverse effects on human beings that would be caused by the proposed Project. The environmental evaluation has concluded that no significant environmental impacts will result from the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts concerning adverse effects on human beings would be less than significant.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank.
5.0 References
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
5.0 REFERENCES
Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County. (2019). AELUP Notification Area for FMA. Retrieved from https://files.ocair.com/media/2021-05/influence-area-fullerton muni.pdf?VersionId=NXvUATlB6XT2qatYXABQ5oT4A4wuKthA.
Arcadis. (June 2021). 2020 UWMP for City of Fullerton. Available at:
https://www.cityoffullerton.com/home/showpublisheddocument/5052/637598829614070000, Accessed July 15, 2021
CalFire. (June, 2019). FHSZ Viewer. Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed June 2, 2021.
California Department of Transportation. (2018). California Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=2e921695c43643b1aaf70 00dfcc19983, Accessed June 1, 2021.
California Department of Conservation. (2018). California Statutes and Regulations for the California Geological Survey. Sacramento, CA: California Geological Survey.
California Department of Conservation. (2015). CGS Information Warehouse: Regulatory Maps.
Retrieved from http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/.
California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, available at:
http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html, Accessed June 7, 2021.
California Department of Conservation. (2016). Williamson Act/Land Conservation Act. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/lca. Accessed June 7, 2021.
California Department of Conservation. (2015). Earthquake Zones Required Investigation La Habra Quadrangle. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/regulatorymaps/, Accessed June 15, 2021.
California Department of Conservation. 2019. Landslide Inventory Beta. Available at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/lsi/app/, Accessed June 16, 2021.
California Department of Education. Data Quest for Fullerton Elementary. Available at:
https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/dqcensus/EnrEthGrd.aspx?cds=3066506&agglevel=district&ye ar=2020-21, Accessed June 11, 2021.
California Department of Education. Data Quest for Fullerton Joint Union High School District. Available at:
https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/dqcensus/EnrEthGrd.aspx?cds=3066514&agglevel=district&ye ar=2020-21 , Accessed June 11, 2021.
California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2011-2021. Sacramento, California, June 2021.
California Energy Commission, 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Available at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency- standards/2022-building-energy-efficiency, Accessed May 28, 2021.
California Energy Commission, California Energy Demand 2018-2030 Revised Forecast, Figure 49 Historical and Projected Baseline Consumption SCE Planning Area, January 2018.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2020 California Gas Report, Southern California Gas Company Annual Gas Supply 2020-2035 Table 1-SCG, Available at:
https://www.socalgas.com/sites/default/files/2020-
10/2020_California_Gas_Report_Joint_Utility_Biennial_Comprehensive_Filing.pdf, Accessed May 28, 2021.
California Air Resources Board, Climate Change Scoping Plan, 2008.
California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, 2013.
Orange County Transportation Authority, Annual Traffic Volume Maps, https://www.octa.net/pdf/2019- ADT.pdf, accessed May 25, 2021.
California Department of Toxic Substance Control. (2021). Envirostor Database. Retrieved from https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/.
CalRecycle. (2021). Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Facility Details – Olinda Alpha Landfill (30-AB- 0035). Retrieved from
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2757?siteID=2093. Accessed on June 28, 2021.
City of Fullerton General Plan Update, 2013-2021 Housing Element, Available at:
https://www.cityoffullerton.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=8256, Accessed May 28, 2021.
City of Fullerton. (2021). GoZone 2.1 GIS Webtool. Available at: https://gis.cityoffullerton.com/gozone/ City of Fullerton. (2012). The Fullerton Plan, Page 124 City of Fullerton, Fire Station Locations & Apparatus, available at:
https://www.cityoffullerton.com/government/departments/fire/about-us/fire-station- locations-apparatus, accessed June 26, 2021.
City of Fullerton, Fullerton Police About Us, Available at:
https://www.cityoffullerton.com/government/departments/police/about-fpd, Accessed June 11, 2021.
City of Fullerton. (2012). Bicycle Master Plan. Available at:
https://www.cityoffullerton.com/home/showpublisheddocument/1071/637436165499630000.
Accessed July 8, 2021.
Federal Highway Administration, Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance, Noise Fundamentals,
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environMent/noise/regulations_and_guidance/polguide/polguide02 .cfm, accessed May 28, 2021.
Fullerton School District. Find My School. Available at:
https://locator.decisioninsite.com/?studyId=235119#, Accessed June 11, 2021.
Fullerton High School Union District. Find My School. Available at:
https://locator.decisioninsite.com/?StudyID=205959, Accessed June 11, 2021.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
Fullerton School District, Financial Analyst, Available at:
https://www.fullertonsd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=1147932&type=d&pREC_ID=1147 626, Accessed June 11, 2021.
SCAG, Demographics and Growth Forecast, 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategies. Los Angeles, California, June 2021.
State Water Resources Control Board. (2021). GeoTracker. Retrieved from https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
United States, Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA. Flood Insurance Rate Map 0659C0039J.
Available at
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=euclid%20and%20rosecrans%2C%20fullerto n#searchresultsanchor . Accessed June 28, 2021.
United States, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html, accessed January 29, 2021.
The Pines at Sunrise Village Project Initial Study and City of Fullerton Mitigated Negative Declaration
This page intentionally left blank.