CITY OF FULLERTON
Fire User Fee Study
i Comprehensive User Fee Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................... ......................................... i Executive Summary .................................................................................... .......................................... 1 User Fee Background ............................... ................................................... ......................................... 2 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 2 California User Fee History .......................................................................................................................... 2 Additional Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................. 3 Study Objective ................................... ................................................... ............................................. 4 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Aim of the Report......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project Approach and Methodology ..................................................................... ................................ 6 Conceptual Approach................................................................................................................................... 6 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................ 6 Summary Steps of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 7 Allowable Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 8 Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees............................................................................. 8 City Staff Contributions ................................................................................................................................ 9 Fullerton User Fees .................................................................................. .......................................... 10 Cost Recovery............................................................................................................................................. 10 Subsidization .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Impact on Demand (Elasticity) ................................................................................................................... 11 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Fire ................................................................................................. ................................................... 12 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered .................................................... ....................... 13 Appendix B – Fully Burdened Hourly Rates ............................................................. ............................ 14 Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis .................................................................. ................................ 15
1 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Executive Summary
The City of Fullerton engaged Willdan Financial Ser vices (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurre d by the City to support the various activities for whic h the City charges user fees. Due to the complexit y and the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individ ual fee and program activities. This report and th e appendices herein identifies 100% full cost recover y for City services and the recommended level of recovery as determined through discussion with departmental staff.
The reality of the local government fee environment is that significant increases to achieve 100% cost recovery can often not be feasible, desirable, or appropriate depending on policy direction —particularly in a single year. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.
2 Comprehensive User Fee Study
User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole. As cities struggle to maintain levels of service and variability of demand, they have bec ome increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the General Fund and have implemented cost-recovery tar gets. To the extent that governments use general tax monies to provide individuals with private bene fits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide other community-wide benefits. In effect, the gover nment is using community funds to pay for private benefit. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have m ore control over the level of user fees they charge to recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.
Fees in California are required to conform to the s tatutory requirements of the California Constitutio n, Proposition 218, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of ren dering the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the charge would be considered a tax and not a fee.
California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, California cities were less concerned with potential subsidies and recovering the cost of their services from individual fee payers. In times of fiscal shortages, cities simply raised property taxes, which funded everything from police and recreation to development-related services. However, this situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.
Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years, the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the impositi on of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a resul t, cities were required to secure a supermajority vote in order to enact or increase taxes. Since the public continues to resist efforts to raise local government taxes, cities have little control and very few successful options for new revenues. Compounding this limitation, the Stat e of California took a series of actions in the 199 0’s and 2000’s to improve the State’s fiscal situation—at the expense of local governments. As an example, in 2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) take-away of property taxes and the reduction of Vehicle License Fees have severely reduced local tax revenues.
In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative”, which is aimed at defining “regulatory fees” as a special tax rather than a fee, thus req uiring approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the societal and environmental impacts of a business or person’s activities. Proposition 26 contains seve n categories of exceptions. The vast majority of fee s that cities would seek to adopt will most likely fall into one or more of these exemptions.
3 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Additional Policy Considerations
The recent trend for municipalities is to update th eir fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of ce rtain public services primarily benefitting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.
In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments t o recover support costs. Support costs are those c osts relating to a local government’s central service de partments that are properly allocable to the local government’s operating departments. Central service s support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determi ned through the Cost Allocation Plan. This plan was developed prior to the User Fee study to determine the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments in order to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost.
As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it h as the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, i t is recommended that the City include an inflationary f actor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule t o allow the City Council, by resolution, to annually increase or decrease the fees.
The City may employ many different inflationary fac tors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely w ell known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same “bas ket” of goods and services every year, the price deflato rs’ “basket” can change year to year. Since the pr imary factor for the cost of a City’s services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an infl ationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can be suitable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.
Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs. It is also recommended that the City perform this interna l review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every three to five years, which would include adding or removing fees for any new or eliminated programs/services.
4 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Study Objective
As the City of Fullerton seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. Thes e tools provide assurance that the City has the bes t information and the best resources available to mak e sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees , maintain compliance with state law and local polici es, and meet the needs of the City administration a nd its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes th at a User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to unde rstand the total cost of services and identify pote ntial fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.
The total cost of each service included in this ana lysis is based on the full cost of providing City s ervices, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full co st recovery fee for the City to provide each servic e; however, each fee is set at the City’s discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.
The principle goal of the study was to help the Cit y determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
Developing a rational basis for setting fees
Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model Enhancing fairness and equity
Ensuring compliance with State law
Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better underst and its true costs of providing services and may se rve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regard ing the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect f rom individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.
Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and ca lculation of user fees charged by the following Fullerton departments and fee groups:
Fire
The study involved the identification of existing a nd potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultati on, quality control, communication and presentation s, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels.
5 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City serv ices, as City staff currently provides them at exis ting, known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff levels. This report provides a summary of the stud y results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determin e the recommended fee schedule. The report is not int ended to document all of the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or other approaches.
6 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determi ne the “reasonable cost” of each service provided by the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City’s fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.
The standard fee limitation established in California law for property-related (non-discretionary) fees is the “estimated, reasonable cost” principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figure s, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.
Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits, but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
Operating costs applicable to fee operations
Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead Indirect City-wide overhead costs calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan An important factor in determining the fully burden ed rate is in the calculation of productive hours f or personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this fi gure to account for calculated or anticipated hours’ employ ees are involved in non-billable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, emergency leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary. Dividing the full cost by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.
The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time es timates, when appropriate, to calculate a fees' cos t based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.
7 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Summary Steps of the Study
The methodology to evaluate most User Fee levels is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:
Allowable Costs
This report identifies three types of costs that, w hen combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A) . Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City’s
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee-related
services.
Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function. Central Services Overhead: These costs, detailed in the City’s Cost Allocation Plan, represent services provided by those Central Services Departm ents whose primary function is to support other City departments.
Data Analysis
Department Interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Cost Allocation Plan
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City-Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
8 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Methodology
The method of analysis for calculating fees used in this report is the case study method (standard unit cost build-up approach). This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis i s suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary dramatically for a service, or for special projects where the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project’s outset. Further, the method is eff ective in instances when a staff member from one department assists on an application, service or pe rmit for another department on an as-needed basis.
Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.
Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ulti mate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The element s of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
Reasonableness tests and validation
Normalcy/expectation ranges
FTE balancing
Internal and external reviews
Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current f ees Within the fee tables in Appendix C , the differences identified between the full costs calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in effect. The reasons for differences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:
Previous fee levels may have been set at levels les s than full cost intentionally, based on policy decisions
Staffing levels and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study
Costs that this study has identified as part of the full cost of services may not have been accounted for in a previous study
o Departmental overhead and administration costs
o Indirect overhead from the Cost Allocation Plan
Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the city as a whole
9 Comprehensive User Fee Study
City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
Budget and other cost data
Staffing structures
Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions Direct and indirect work hours (billable/non-billable) Time estimates to complete work tasks
Current fee levels
Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement o f the managers and line staff from the departments— on top of their existing workloads and competing pr iorities. The contributions from City staff were cr itical to this study. We would like to express our appreci ation to the City and its staff for their assistanc e, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation.
10 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Fullerton User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C . Full cost recovery is predominantly determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimates for each service rendered were predominately determined by Willdan and City Staff through a time and materials survey conducted for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.
It is important to note that the time and materials survey used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is an essential working document in identifying the total cost of providing each service. Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.
The principle goal of this study was to identify th e cost of City services, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual f ee levels and charges. The responsibility to determ ine the final fee levels is a complicated task. City st aff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.
City staff assumes the responsibility to develop sp ecific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Fullerton, and administrative and political discretion.
However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the serv ice solely benefits one end user or the general community.
Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is that individuals (or groups) whom receive a wholly private benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund’s tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers , many services fall into the range between these t wo extremes.
Further complicating the decision, opponents of fee s often assert that the activities subject to the f ees provide economic, cultural, “quality of life,” or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City.
It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels.
Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool, since it can be used to reduce fees t o encourage certain activities (such as compliance inspections to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they other wise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsi dies can
11 Comprehensive User Fee Study
be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as t o allow citizens to rightfully access services, wit hout burdensome costs.
Despite the intent, it is important for the City an d public to understand that subsidies must be cover ed by another revenue source, such as the General Fund. Therefore, the general taxpayer will potentially help to fund private benefits, and/or other City services will not receive funds that are otherwise directed to cover subsidies.
Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these conditi ons may be a desirable effect to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes i s largely unknown. The Cost of Service Study did no t attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impa cts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.
Summary
If the City’s principal goal of this study were to maximize revenues from user fees, Willdan would recommend setting user fees at 100% of the full cost identified in this study. However, we understand that revenue enhancement is not the only goal of a cost of service study, and sometimes full-cost recovery is not needed, desired, or appropriate. Other City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, polic y initiatives, past experience, implementation issues , and other internal and external factors may influ ence staff recommendations and City Council decisions. I n this case, the proper identification of additiona l services (new or existing services) and creation of a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule was th e primary objective of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the “recommended fee levels” for consideration by City Council. The attached appendices exhibit these unit fees individually.
The preceding sections provide background for each department or division and the results of this study’s analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee’s analysis, refer to Appendix C of this report.
12 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Fire
The Fullerton Fire Department is composed of 87 tra ined professional employees, seven (7) of those are Chief Officers. They have six (6) Fire Stations str ategically located throughout the City. The Departm ent responds to fires, medical aids, hazardous conditio ns, and public assistance requests, such as aid to the elderly or physically challenged, vehicle lockouts, water damage, flooding, and sewer breaks. Fire Department employees conduct inspections and respond to complaints by enforcing laws and regulations designed to protect lives and property. Public educ ation in the areas of fire safety, first aid, and d isaster preparedness is provided upon request.
Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Fire Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing service s in an effort to update the fee schedule. The res ult of that evaluation was a reconstruction of the current fee schedule to better fit how service is provided and better represents the cost of services listed. The re are a large number of new fees listed in the sch edule, but many are a derivative of the former schedule, or is a service that was being provided by another means previously.
The analysis of Fire Services cost of service relied upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurren ce using staff provided time data for direct staff involvement and positional fully burdened hourly rates to determine the cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most services’ cur rent fees are currently set below full cost. Services a re being subsidized, and staff has provided suggest ed fee levels to increase cost recovery
. Staff is recommending a gradual increase on most of the fees by each year, so that within three years, the fees would achieve the 100% cost recovery level per fee as detailed in Appendix C . As a result, there would be:
an increase to 125 fees;
64 new fees would be added;
a decrease to 3 fees,
11 fees would remain as currently set, and;
the average estimated fee increase for Fire would be around 38%.
13 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a percentage of the total allowable cost is realized as staff not only works on services related to User Fees, but also works on an array of other City functions during the operational hours of the City. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were excluded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, contract costs, and any o ther costs that is charged directly to the service requestor.
City of Fullerton - Fire User Fee Study
Overhead Rate Calculations
Department
Salaries &
Benefits
Department
Operations &
Administration
Direct
Overhead
%
Indirect
Allocation
%
Fire Administration 887,064 153,226 17% 10% Operations 20,213,190 4,291,077 21% 10% Fire Prevention 408,215 128,213 31% 10%
14 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix B – Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhea d amounts for each position. For any user fee serv ice request that is outside the scope of the fees detai led in Appendix C , or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved.
City of Fullerton - Fire User Fee Study
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Position
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
Department Rates
Fire Administration $152.53
Fire Prevention $169.42
Operations $204.13
Position Rates
Fire Administration Fire Admin - ADMIN ASSISTANT I $77.47 Fire Administration Fire Admin - CUSTOMER SERVICE RE PRESENTATIVE $64.17 Fire Administration Fire Admin - FIRE CHIEF $365.58
Fire Administration Fire Admin - SR. ADMIN ANALYST $102.89 Fire Prevention Fire Prev - BATTALION CHIEF (DEPUTY CHIEF - FIRE MARSHAL) $354.65 Fire Prevention Fire Prev - FIRE PREVENTION SP1 $86.97
Fire Prevention Fire Prev - FIRE PREVENTION SP2 $109.12 Fire Prevention Fire Prev - ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL / FIRE PLANS EXAMINER $126.93 Operations Operations - BATTALION CHIEF $229.10
Operations Operations - BATTALION CHIEF (DEPUTY CHIE F - OPERATIONS) $315.87 Operations Operations - BATTALION CHIEF (DIVISION CH IEF - TRAINING) $249.41 Operations Operations - EMERGENCY MEDICAL SVCS (EMS) MANAGER $136.20 Operations Operations - EMERGENCY PREP COORDINATOR $115.32 Operations Operations - FIRE CAPTAIN $241.50
Operations Operations - FIRE ENGINEER $198.37
Operations Operations - FIREFIGHTER $147.27
15 Comprehensive User Fee Study
Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the ana lysis, resulting full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees. For fees in which the full cost, existing fee and suggested fee is listed as “NA”, the amount or percentage was not calculable based on cost data or variable fee structure. This is most common when either the current or the suggested fee includ es a variable component that is not comparable on a one to one basis, a full cost was not calculated (f or penalties and fines), or when there is not a cur rent fee amount to compare against.
Fire Department
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Year 1 Suggested Year 2 Suggested Year 3 Suggested Fee Total Total Fee Δ 1 Operational Permits- 2022 CFC- Section 105
2 Additive Manufacturing New $218.25 0% $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 NA 3 Aerosol Products, aerosol cooking spray products and plastic aerosol 3 products 149.00 $218.25 0% $172.00 $195.00 $218.00 $218.00 $69 4 Aircraft refueling vehicles New $436.49 0% $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 NA 5 Amusement buildings same fee as Places of
Assembly Use Places of Assembly Fee NA NA same fee as Places of Assembly
same fee as Places of
Assembly
same fee as Places of
Assembly
same fee as Places of
Assembly $0
6 Aviation facilities 228.00 $347.87 0% $267.00 $307.00 $347.00 $347.00 $119 7 Carnivals and fairs see Places of Assembly Use Places of Assembly Fee NA NA same fee as Places of Assembly
same fee as Places of
Assembly
same fee as Places of
Assembly
same fee as Places of
Assembly $0
8 Cellulose nitrate film 205.00 $218.25 0% $209.00 $213.00 $218.00 $218.00 $13 9 Christmas Tree Lots 212.00 $347.87 0% $257.00 $302.00 $347.00 $347.00 $135 10 Christmas Tree Lot Deposit $1,000 1,000.00 Deposit NA NA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $0 11 Combustible dust-producing operations 192.00 $260.90 0% $214.00 $237.00 $260.00 $260.00 $68 12 Combustible fibers 180.00 $260.90 0% $206.00 $233.00 $260.00 $260.00 $80 13 Compressed gases 180.00 $218.25 0% $192.00 $205.00 $218.00 $218.00 $38 14 Carbon Dioxide systems used in beverage dispensing applications New $173.93 1% $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 NA 15 Covered mall buildings 409.00 $434.84 0% $417.00 $425.00 $434.00 $434.00 $25 16 Cryogenic fluids 180.00 $218.25 0% $192.00 $205.00 $218.00 $218.00 $38 17 Cutting and welding 105.00 $173.93 1% $127.00 $150.00 $173.00 $173.00 $68 18 Dry cleaning plants 135.00 $173.93 1% $147.00 $160.00 $173.00 $173.00 $38 19 Energy Storage Systems New $436.49 0% $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 NA 20 Exhibits and trade shows 190.00 $347.87 0% $242.00 $294.00 $347.00 $347.00 $157 21 Explosives 185.00 $327.37 0% $232.00 $279.00 $327.00 $327.00 $142 22 Fire hydrants and valves 149.00 $173.93 1% $157.00 $165.00 $173.00 $173.00 $24 23 Fireworks Stand 422.00 $869.67 0% $571.00 $720.00 $869.00 $869.00 $447 24 Fireworks Stand Electrical Hookup (Optional) 136.00 $86.97 1% $86.00 $86.00 $86.00 $86.00 -$50 25 Fireworks display 422.00 $1,091.23 0% $645.00 $868.00 $1,091.00 $1,091.00 $669 26 Flammable and Combustible Liquids- See 2022 CFC 105.5.18 when required 27 1. To use or operate a pipeline for the transportation facilities of flammable or combustible liquids. This is requirement shall not apply to the off-site transportation in pipelines regulated by the DOT nor does it apply to piping systems. 110.00 $218.25 0% $146.00 $182.00 $218.00 $218.00 $108 28 2. To store, handle, or use Class I liquids in excess of 5 gallons in a building or in excess of 10 gallons outside of a building, except that a permit is not required as listed in the Code (including 2.1 and 2.2). 68.00 $218.25 0% $118.00 $168.00 $218.00 $218.00 $150 29 3. To store, handle or use Class II or Class IIIA liquids in excess of 25 gallons in a building or in excess of 60 gallons outside a building, except for fuel oil used in connection with oil-burning equipment. 110.00 $218.25 0% $146.00 $182.00 $218.00 $218.00 $108 30 4. To remove Class I or Class II liquids from an underground storage tank used for fueling motor vehicles by any means other than the approved, stationary on-site pumps normally used for dispensing purposes. 110.00 $327.37 0% $182.00 $254.00 $327.00 $327.00 $217 31 5. To operate tank vehicles, equipment, tanks, plants, terminals, wells, fuel-dispensing stations, refineries, distilleries and similar facilities where flammable and combustible liquids are produced, processed, transported, stored, dispensed or used. 110.00 $327.37 0% $182.00 $254.00 $327.00 $327.00 $217 32 Aboveground Tank (annual Fee) per tank 192.00 $327.37 0% $237.00 $282.00 $327.00 $327.00 $135 33 Underground Tank (annual Fee) per tank 540.00 $545.62 0% $541.00 $543.00 $545.00 $545.00 $5 34 6. To place temporarily out of service (for more than 90 days) and underground, protected above-ground or above-ground flammable or combustible liquid tank.
35 First Tank 174.00 $218.25 0% $188.00 $203.00 $218.00 $218.00 $44 36 Each Additional Tank 107.00 $163.69 0% $125.00 $144.00 $163.00 $163.00 $56 37 7. To change the type of contents stored in a flammable or combustible liquid tank to a material which poses a greater hazard than that for which the tank was designed and constructed. 100.00 $327.37 0% $175.00 $251.00 $327.00 $327.00 $227 38 8. To manufacture, process, blend or refine flammable or combustible liquids. 174.00 $218.25 0% $188.00 $203.00 $218.00 $218.00 $44 39 9. To engage in the dispensing of liquid fuels into the fuel tanks of motor vehicles at commercial, industrial, governmental or manufacturing establishments (unless covered by repair and dispensing permit). 174.00 $218.25 0% $188.00 $203.00 $218.00 $218.00 $44 40 10. To utilize a site for the dispensing of liquid fuels from tank vehicles into the fuel tanks of motor vehicles at commercial, industrial, governmental or manufacturing establishments. 174.00 $218.25 0% $188.00 $203.00 $218.00 $218.00 $44 41 Floor finishing 95.00 $173.93 1% $121.00 $147.00 $173.00 $173.00 $78 42 Fruit and crop ripening 149.00 $173.93 1% $157.00 $165.00 $173.00 $173.00 $24 43 Fumigation and thermal insecticidal fogging 149.00 $218.25 0% $172.00 $195.00 $218.00 $218.00 $69 44 General use- shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described in this section, which in the judgment of the fire code official is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. 67.00 $218.25 0% $117.00 $167.00 $218.00 $218.00 $151 45 Hazardous Materials (2022 CFC 105.5.22, table 105.5.22) New $218.25 0% $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 NA 46 Hazardous Production Material facilities 285.00 $327.37 0% $299.00 $313.00 $327.00 $327.00 $42 47 High-piled storage 164.00 $260.90 0% $196.00 $228.00 $260.00 $260.00 $96 48 Hot work operations - (per hour/one hour min. for plan review/inspection). 106.00 FPS 1 rate $173.93 1% $128.00 $150.00 $173.00 $173.00 $67 49 Industrial ovens 134.00 $173.93 1% $147.00 $160.00 $173.00 $173.00 $39 50 Lumber yards and woodworking plants 139.00 $173.93 1% $150.00 $161.00 $173.00 $173.00 $34 51 Liquid- or gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings 149.00 $173.93 1% $157.00 $165.00 $173.00 $173.00 $24 52 LP Gas 125.00 $218.25 0% $156.00 $187.00 $218.00 $218.00 $93 53 LPG/CNG Outdoor Heater Fee - first two appliances 25.00 $86.97 1% $45.00 $65.00 $86.00 $86.00 $61 54 1. Each additional appliance 10.00 $43.48 1% $21.00 $32.00 $43.00 $43.00 $33 55 Magnesium 117.00 $218.25 0% $150.00 $184.00 $218.00 $218.00 $101 56 Miscellaneous combustible storage 164.00 $173.93 1% $167.00 $170.00 $173.00 $173.00 $9 57 Mobile Fueling Operations excluding Hydrogen-Fueled Vehicles New $436.49 0% $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 NA 58 Mobile Fueling of Hydrogen-Fueled Vehicles New $436.49 0% $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 $436.00 NA 59 Motor fuel-dispensing facilities New $260.90 0% $260.00 $260.00 $260.00 $260.00 NA 60 Open burning 25.00 $173.93 1% $74.00 $123.00 $173.00 $173.00 $148 61 Food preparation fires under this classification 10.00 $86.97 1% $35.00 $60.00 $86.00 $86.00 $76 62 Open flames and torches 97.00 $173.93 1% $122.00 $147.00 $173.00 $173.00 $76 63 Open flames and candles (in any facility that serves food/alcohol) 97.00 $173.93 1% $122.00 $147.00 $173.00 $173.00 $76 64 Organic coatings 180.00 $218.25 0% $192.00 $205.00 $218.00 $218.00 $38 65 Outdoor Assembly Permit New $173.93 1% $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 NA 16 Fire Department
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Year 1 Suggested Year 2 Suggested Year 3 Suggested Fee Total Total Fee Δ 66 Places of assembly
67 1. Occupant load, 50-- 500 300.00 $347.87 0% $315.00 $331.00 $347.00 $347.00 $47 68 2. Occupant load, 501 -- 1000 375.00 $434.84 0% $394.00 $414.00 $434.00 $434.00 $59 69 3. Occupant load, 1001 and above 449.00 $521.80 0% $473.00 $497.00 $521.00 $521.00 $72 70 Plant Extraction Systems New $218.25 0% $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 NA 71 Private fire hydrants 149.00 $173.93 1% $157.00 $165.00 $173.00 $173.00 $24 72 Pyrotechnic special effects material 457.00 $545.62 0% $486.00 $515.00 $545.00 $545.00 $88 73 Pyroxylin plastics 191.00 $218.25 0% $200.00 $209.00 $218.00 $218.00 $27 74 Refrigeration equipment 209.00 $218.25 0% $212.00 $215.00 $218.00 $218.00 $9 75 Repair garages and/or motor fuel-dispensing facilities 225.00 $260.90 0% $236.00 $248.00 $260.00 $260.00 $35 76 Rooftop heliports 191.00 $392.18 0% $258.00 $325.00 $392.00 $392.00 $201 77 Spraying and dipping 226.00 $327.37 0% $259.00 $293.00 $327.00 $327.00 $101 78 Storage of scrap tires and tire byproducts 164.00 $260.90 0% $196.00 $228.00 $260.00 $260.00 $96 79 Temporary membrane structures, tents and canopies 249.00 $260.90 0% $252.00 $256.00 $260.00 $260.00 $11 80 Tire-rebuilding plants 191.00 $260.90 0% $214.00 $237.00 $260.00 $260.00 $69 81 Waste handling 149.00 $173.93 1% $157.00 $165.00 $173.00 $173.00 $24 82 Wood products 149.00 $173.93 1% $157.00 $165.00 $173.00 $173.00 $24 83 Lithium Batteries New $327.37 0% $327.00 $327.00 $327.00 $327.00 NA 84 Additional Permits (production, motion picture)
85 Production facilities (live audience, etc.) 238.00 $260.90 0% $245.00 $252.00 $260.00 $260.00 $22 86 Pyrotechnics and special effects 185.00 $327.37 0% $232.00 $279.00 $327.00 $327.00 $142 87 Live audiences see Places of Assembly NA NA see Places of Assembly
see Places of
Assembly
see Places of
Assembly
see Places of
Assembly $0
88 Required Construction Permits (2022 CFC 105.6)
89 Automatic fire-extinguishing systems 285.00 $380.78 0% $316.00 $348.00 $380.00 $380.00 $95 90 Battery systems 164.00 $380.78 0% $236.00 $308.00 $380.00 $380.00 $216 91 Compressed gases 180.00 $380.78 0% $246.00 $313.00 $380.00 $380.00 $200 92 Cryogenic Fluids 180.00 $380.78 0% $246.00 $313.00 $380.00 $380.00 $200 93 Emergency responder communication coverage system 275.00 $380.78 0% $310.00 $345.00 $380.00 $380.00 $105 94 Energy storage system New $380.78 0% $380.00 $380.00 $380.00 $380.00 NA 95 Fire alarm detection systems and related equipment 285.00 $380.78 0% $316.00 $348.00 $380.00 $380.00 $95 96 Fire pumps and related equipment 285.00 $380.78 0% $316.00 $348.00 $380.00 $380.00 $95 97 Flammable and combustible liquids
98 To repair or modify a pipeline for the transportation of flammable or combustible liquids 110.00 $380.78 0% $200.00 $290.00 $380.00 $380.00 $270 99 To install, construct, or alter tank vehicles, equipment, tank, plants, terminals, wells, fuel-dispensing stations, refineries, distilleries and similar facilities where flammable and combustible liquids are produced, processed, transported, stored, dispensed or used 192.00 $380.78 0% $254.00 $317.00 $380.00 $380.00 $188 100
Aboveground Tank
101 First Tank 603.00 $634.63 0% $613.00 $623.00 $634.00 $634.00 $31 102 Each Additional Tank 60.00 $317.31 0% $145.00 $231.00 $317.00 $317.00 $257 103 Underground Tank
104 First Tank 1,200.00 $1,396.18 0% $1,265.00 $1,330.00 $1,396.00 $1,396.00 $196 105 Each Additional Tank 239.00 $634.63 0% $370.00 $502.00 $634.00 $634.00 $395 106 To perform annual testing on tanks, equipment or piping (per site/per hour) 106.00 $380.78 0% $197.00 $288.00 $380.00 $380.00 $274 107 To perform system modification (including repair):
108 Plan Check first tank 603.00 hourly Assistant Fire Marshal / Fire Plans Examiner $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 -$477 109 Each additional tank 107.00 hourly Assistant Fire Marshal / Fire Plans Examiner $126.93 1% $113.00 $119.00 $126.00 $126.00 $19 110
To remove, abandon or otherwise dispose of a flammable or combustible liquid tank. 111 Aboveground Tank
112 First Tank 603.00 $634.63 0% $613.00 $623.00 $634.00 $634.00 $31 113 Each Additional Tank 60.00 $317.31 0% $145.00 $231.00 $317.00 $317.00 $257 114 Underground Tank
115 First Tank 1,080.00 $1,269.26 0% $1,143.00 $1,206.00 $1,269.00 $1,269.00 $189 116 Each Additional Tank 239.00 $253.85 0% $243.00 $248.00 $253.00 $253.00 $14 117 Site Remediation
118 First three (3) hours 317.00 hourly Assistant Fire Marshal / Fire Plans Examiner $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 -$191 119 Each additional hour 106.00 hourly Assistant Fire Marshal / Fire Plans Examiner $126.93 1% $112.00 $119.00 $126.00 $126.00 $20 120 Fuel Cell power system 378.00 $380.78 0% $378.00 $379.00 $380.00 $380.00 $2 121 Gas detection system New $253.85 0% $253.00 $253.00 $253.00 $253.00 NA 122 Gates and barricades across fire apparatus access roads New $253.85 0% $253.00 $253.00 $253.00 $253.00 NA 123 Hazardous Materials 378.00 $380.78 0% $378.00 $379.00 $380.00 $380.00 $2 124 High-piled combustible storage 423.00 $507.70 0% $451.00 $479.00 $507.00 $507.00 $84 125 Industrial ovens 134.00 $253.85 0% $173.00 $213.00 $253.00 $253.00 $119 126
LP-gas
127 1. Installation -- up to 1,000 gallons 192.00 $380.78 0% $254.00 $317.00 $380.00 $380.00 $188 128 2. Installation -- 1,001 to 10,000 gallons 386.00 $507.70 0% $426.00 $466.00 $507.00 $507.00 $121 129 3. Installation - greater than 10,000 gallons 525.00 $634.63 0% $561.00 $597.00 $634.00 $634.00 $109 130 Motor Vehicle repair room and booths New $380.78 0% $380.00 $380.00 $380.00 $380.00 NA 131 Private fire hydrants 149.00 $380.78 0% $226.00 $303.00 $380.00 $380.00 $231 132 Smoke control or smoke exhaust system New $507.70 0% $507.00 $507.00 $507.00 $507.00 NA 133 Solar photovoltaic power systems New $380.78 0% $380.00 $380.00 $380.00 $380.00 NA 134 Spraying and dipping 205.00 $380.78 0% $263.00 $321.00 $380.00 $380.00 $175 135 Standpipe systems 314.00 $507.70 0% $378.00 $442.00 $507.00 $507.00 $193 17 Fire Department
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Year 1 Suggested Year 2 Suggested Year 3 Suggested Fee Total Total Fee Δ 136 Temporary membrane structures, tents and canopies 226.00 $253.85 0% $235.00 $244.00 $253.00 $253.00 $27 137 Inspection Fees
138 AB-38 Defensible space inspection New $173.93 1% $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 NA 139 Fire Clearance Inspections (2022 CFC 105.5.57 added) 140 1. New Fire clearance inspection- 3,000 sq ft or less 153.00 $173.93 1% $159.00 $166.00 $173.00 $173.00 $20 141 2. New Fire clearance inspection- 3,001 sq ft or more 240.00 $260.90 0% $246.00 $253.00 $260.00 $260.00 $20 142 Fire Clearance Required by the State or Other Governmental Agency 143 Convalescent and Nursing Homes
144 Up to 75 Beds 308.00 $347.87 0% $321.00 $334.00 $347.00 $347.00 $39 145 76 to 130 Beds 370.00 $434.84 0% $391.00 $412.00 $434.00 $434.00 $64 146 131 and above 493.00 $521.80 0% $502.00 $511.00 $521.00 $521.00 $28 147 Child Day Care Facilities -- less than 26 persons 50.00 $173.93 1% $91.00 $132.00 $173.00 $173.00 $123 148 Child Day Care Facilities -- 26 or more persons 100.00 $260.90 0% $153.00 $206.00 $260.00 $260.00 $160 149 Hospitals, less than 100 beds 341.00 $347.87 0% $343.00 $345.00 $347.00 $347.00 $6 150 Hospitals, 100 beds or more 546.00 $695.74 0% $595.00 $645.00 $695.00 $695.00 $149 151 Sanitariums 273.00 $347.87 0% $297.00 $322.00 $347.00 $347.00 $74 152 Schools (private) 238.00 $260.90 0% $245.00 $252.00 $260.00 $260.00 $22 153 Residential Care Facility, less than 26 persons 50.00 $173.93 1% $91.00 $132.00 $173.00 $173.00 $123 154 Residential Care Facility, 26 or more persons 100.00 $260.90 0% $153.00 $206.00 $260.00 $260.00 $160 155 High Rise Building -- Annual Inspection 523.00 $695.74 0% $580.00 $637.00 $695.00 $695.00 $172 156 Fire/Life Safety Inspection
157 B Occupancies with no fire permits or fire protection systems 158 up to 2,000 sq. ft. New $173.93 43% $50.00 $75.00 $100.00 $100.00 NA 159 2,001-10,000 sq. ft. New $260.90 52% $75.00 $100.00 $125.00 $125.00 NA 160 Over 10,000 sq. ft. New $347.87 50% $125.00 $150.00 $175.00 $175.00 NA 165 E Occupancies other then day care (per building)
166 up to 2,000 sq. ft. New $173.93 1% $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 NA 167 2,001-10,000 sq. ft. New $260.90 0% $260.00 $260.00 $260.00 $260.00 NA 168 Over 10,000 sq. ft. New $347.87 0% $347.00 $347.00 $347.00 $347.00 NA 169 A, F, H, L, M, & S Occupancies with no fire permits or fire protection systems 170 up to 2,000 sq. ft. New $260.90 0% $260.00 $260.00 $260.00 $260.00 NA 171 2,001-10,000 sq. ft. New $347.87 0% $347.00 $347.00 $347.00 $347.00 NA 172 Over 10,000 sq. ft. New $434.84 0% $434.00 $434.00 $434.00 $434.00 NA 173 R1 & R2 (Multi-family housing, congregate living, hotel/motel, sorority/fraternity) 174 Up to 8 units 62.00 $86.97 1% $70.00 $78.00 $86.00 $86.00 $24 175 9 to 20 units 93.00 $130.45 0% $105.00 $117.00 $130.00 $130.00 $37 176 21 to 40 units 124.00 $173.93 1% $140.00 $156.00 $173.00 $173.00 $49 177 41 to 80 units 185.00 $217.42 0% $195.00 $206.00 $217.00 $217.00 $32 178 81 to 150 units 247.00 $260.90 0% $251.00 $255.00 $260.00 $260.00 $13 179 151 to 300 units 308.00 $434.84 0% $350.00 $392.00 $434.00 $434.00 $126 180 301 + units 493.00 $521.80 0% $502.00 $511.00 $521.00 $521.00 $28 181 Sorority/Fraternity/Congregate Living 10.00 per person $173.93 1% $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $163 182 Reinspection Fee (without corrections)
183 First reinspection New $109.12 0% $109.00 $109.00 $109.00 $109.00 NA 184 Second reinspection New $218.25 0% $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 $218.00 NA 185 Subsequent Reinspection's New $272.81 0% $272.00 $272.00 $272.00 $272.00 NA 186 Plan Check
187 Hi-pile storage plan check New Hourly one hour minimum $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 NA 188 Outside Dining plan check New Hourly half hour minimum $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 NA 189 Emergency responder communication coverage system New Hourly one hour minimum $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 NA 190 Fuel Modification Plan Review- 106.00 Hourly one hour minimum $126.93 1% $112.00 $119.00 $126.00 $126.00 $20 191 All other plan checks not listed above New Hourly one hour minimum $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 NA 192 Expedited plan check fee New Hourly $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 NA 193 New construction/TI inspection New Hourly one hour minimum per visit $126.93 1% $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 $126.00 NA 194 Rates for Service
195 Alternative Means & Methods of Construction Review (per hour/one hour minimum) deposit of one (1) hour prior to review New Hourly one hour minimum $631.74 0% $631.00 $631.00 $631.00 $631.00 NA 196 Code Interpretation New $315.87 0% $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 NA 197 Consultation New $315.87 0% $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 NA 198 Event stand-by fee (Fire Prevention Specialist) New Hourly two hour minimum $86.97 1% $86.00 $86.00 $86.00 $86.00 NA 199 Fire Watch (requested) New $173.93 1% $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 $173.00 NA 200 Hourly rate New $109.12 0% $109.00 $109.00 $109.00 $109.00 NA 201 Requested Inspection 106.00 Hourly one hour minimum $109.12 0% $107.00 $108.00 $109.00 $109.00 $3 202 Services outside regular business hours 211.00 two hour minimum $218.25 0% $213.00 $215.00 $218.00 $218.00 $7 203 Research and Records Request 0.15 per page $0.15 0% $0.00 $0.00 $0.15 $0.15 $0 204 Weed Abatement Administrative Charge/Fee (added to cost to remove debris from parcel) New NA NA 33% of the total cost of abatement
33% of the total cost
of abatement
33% of the total cost
of abatement
33% of the total cost
of abatement NA
205
False Alarm Fee (each responding unit)
206 False alarm- 2nd within 6 months 231.00 NA NA $237.00 $243.00 $250.00 $250.00 $19 207 Failure to comply with orders tags, or notices- 3rd false alarm within 6 months New NA NA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 NA 208 Failure to comply with orders tags, or notices- 4th false alarm within 6 months New NA NA $750.00 $750.00 $750.00 $750.00 NA 209 Failure to comply with orders tags, or notices- 5th false alarm within 6 months New NA NA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 NA 210 Failure to notify of Fire Protection System being tested or working on prompting a fire response New NA NA $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 NA 211 Suppression Fees for Service
212 Event stand-by New Hourly two hour minimum $109.12 0% $109.00 $109.00 $109.00 $109.00 NA 213 Engine Company (not including personnel) New $2,271.36 0% $2,271.00 $2,271.00 $2,271.00 $2,271.00 NA 18 Fire Department
# Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Year 1 Suggested Year 2 Suggested Year 3 Suggested Fee Total Total Fee Δ 214 Truck Company (not including personnel) New $4,542.72 0% $4,542.00 $4,542.00 $4,542.00 $4,542.00 NA 215 Utility Terrain Vehicle (UTV) with tow vehicle (not including personnel) New $1,970.24 0% $1,970.00 $1,970.00 $1,970.00 $1,970.00 NA 216 Ground Ambulance (not including personnel) New $1,970.24 0% $1,970.00 $1,970.00 $1,970.00 $1,970.00 NA 217 Deputy Chief (one person) New $315.87 0% $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 $315.00 NA 218 Division Chief (one person) New $249.41 0% $249.00 $249.00 $249.00 $249.00 NA 219 Battalion Chief (One person) New $229.10 0% $229.00 $229.00 $229.00 $229.00 NA 220 Paramedic team (two persons) New $294.55 0% $294.00 $294.00 $294.00 $294.00 NA 221 Engine Company Personnel (4 persons) New $734.42 0% $734.00 $734.00 $734.00 $734.00 NA 222 Truck Company personnel (4 persons) New $734.42 0% $734.00 $734.00 $734.00 $734.00 NA 223 Stand-by firefighter (per person) New $147.27 0% $147.00 $147.00 $147.00 $147.00 NA 224 Stand-by Paramedic (per person) New $294.55 0% $294.00 $294.00 $294.00 $294.00 NA 225 Fire Investigations (per hour) New $241.50 0% $241.00 $241.00 $241.00 $241.00 NA 226 EMS Responses
227 Paramedic Services Annual Subscription Program 46.00 Separate Resolution NA NA $46.00 $46.00 $46.00 $46.00 $0 228 Emergency Medical First Responder 275.00 $294.55 0% $281.00 $287.00 $294.00 $294.00 $19 229 Advanced Life Support Escort 275.00 $589.10 0% $379.00 $484.00 $589.00 $589.00 $314 230 Misc. Fees
231 Late Fees
232 30 Days 20% NA NA 20% 20% 20% 20% $0
233 60 Days 30% NA NA 30% 30% 30% 30% $0
234 90 Days 40% NA NA 40% 40% 40% 40% $0
235 120 Days 50% NA NA 50% 50% 50% 50% $0
236 Failure to cancel scheduled inspection New $86.97 1% $86.00 $86.00 $86.00 $86.00 NA 237 Technology automation fee New 13.3% 55% 6% 6% 6% 6% NA 238 Drug/DUI Incident Response
$12,000 maximum per
State law (CA Code
53155)
NA NA
$12,000 maximum
per State law (CA
Code 53155)
$12,000 maximum
per State law (CA
Code 53155)
$12,000 maximum
per State law (CA
Code 53155)
$12,000 maximum
per State law (CA
Code 53155)
$0
239
Accident/Incident response New $734.42 0% $734.00 $734.00 $734.00 $734.00 NA 19 27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 | 951.587.3500 | Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 | Fax: 888.326.6864
951.587.3500 | Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com