April 21, 2026
FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT APPROACH
Street Rehabilitation Approach
As recommended by INRAC at their 7/21/2021 meeting:
Policy Guideline #3 - Street Selection Criteria
All Streets
Streets only – no alley rehabilitation
Equitable distribution of work throughout the City
Combine with Utility Work – Water and/or Sewer
Street work may be completed as a separate project directly after utility work Maintenance History
Bicycle Lanes
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Rating
Condition of pavement compared to adjacent streets
Traffic Volume and Number of Side Streets
Planned Development/Improvements
2 Street Rehabilitation Approach
As recommended by INRAC at their 7/21/2021 meeting:
Policy Guideline #1 – Pavement Rehabilitation Method
Arterial Streets
Grind and Overlay preferred method
Reconstruction/FDR only if geotechnical investigation clearly shows existing pavement section not suitable for grind and overlay Local Streets
Grind and Overlay or ARAM/Chip Seal with slurry seal preferred method Reconstruction/FDR only if geotechnical investigation clearly shows existing pavement section not suitable another method 3 Budgetary Street Costs
Costs are for planning purposes and include design, construction, inspection, testing and contingencies.
Scope of work also includes curb & gutter and sidewalk repair, curb ramps, signing and striping, etc.
Actual rehabilitation method is determined by geotechnical investigation, engineering judgment and available funding.
Rehabilitation Method
Arterial Road
$ per Mi
Arterial Road
$ per SF
Local Street
$ per Mi
Local Street
$ per SF
Slurry Seal
--
--
$367,000
$2.17
2” Grind and Overlay
$2,050,000
$6.48
$1,115,000
$6.60
4” Grind and Overlay
$2,665,000
$8.42
$1,420,000
$8.40
Full Depth Reclamation
$4,325,000
$13.65
$2,085,000
$12.36
Full Reconstruction
$4,980,000
$15.72
$2,200,000
$13.09
4 FY 2026-27 Street Rehabilitation Funding
Currently, we expect $12.164M from the following funding sources to be available for design and constriction of street rehabilitation projects.
Council may revise allocations during overall City budget review process.
Funding
Funding Level
Comments
RMRA/SB1
$4,000,000
100% of revenue allocated to streets.
Measure M2 Local Fair Share
$3,200,000
Revenue split between infrastructure needs.
$3,200,000 streets; $50,000 PMP; $350,000 sidewalk repair Infrastructure Fund
$3,500,000
Revenue of $3,900,000 split between infrastructure needs.
General Fund
$500,000
Final allocation based on overall City needs and available revenue determined during City budget process.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
$350,000
Requested – subject to approval and/or adjustment.
Federal Grants
$614,000
Awarded for design phase only. No construction funding
5 Recent StreetProjects(Since 2022)
6 Current StreetProjects
Note:
Does not show private development street projects
7 Recommended Projects
Arterial Street Projects
State College Blvd – Yorba Linda Blvd to City Limits
Supplemental funding
Harbor Blvd – SR91 to Orangefair Ave
Partnership project extending City of Anaheim project
Euclid St – SR91 to Valencia Dr
Design only
Yorba Linda Blvd – State College Blvd to Bradford Ave (City limits) Design only
Harbor Blvd Complete Streets – Valley View to Valencia Mesa Local match funding
Euclid/Malvern Area
Associated with major sewer improvement project
Rosecrans Ave – Sunny Ridge to Gilbert St
If budget allows
8 Projects supported by INRAC at the March 16th meeting
Recommended Projects
Local Street Projects
Rancho-Verona-Yucca Area
Water main replacement area
Courtney-Ash Area
Water main replacement area
Cannon-Sheppard Area
Water main replacement area
Yale-Santa Fe-Princeton Area
CDBG funds
Slurry Seal or Pavement Treatment Project
Various streets
9 Projects supported by INRAC at the March 16th meeting
FY26-27Proposed StreetProjects
10 Note:
Current funding levels are not sufficient to address all water projects or City street condition needs
Recommended Action
Approve staff recommended approach and projects for FY 2026-27.
OR
Provide direction to staff
11