SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
ACTION PLAN
CITY OF FULLERTON
2026
2 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Fullerton SS4A Action Plan
May 2026 - Draft v2
Prepared by
Lochner
Prepared for
City of Fullerton
3 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Advisory Group
Munish Bharadnaja
Infrastructure and Natural Resources Advisory
Committee
Anjali Tapadia
Active Transportation Committee
Martin Leslie
Traffic and Circulation Commission
Elise Thomas
Transportation Demand Manager, Cal State
Fullerton
Mari Montgomery
Director of Risk Management, Fullerton School
District
Transportation and Circulation Commission
Wayne Carvalho
Appointed by District 3 Council Member
Steven P Sherry
Appointed by District 5 Council Member
David Deleon
Appointed by District 1 Council Member
Arif Mansuri
Appointed by District 4 Council Member
Manuel A Walker
Appointed by District 2 Council Member
Active Transportation Committee
Jennifer Morales
Appointed by District 3 Council Member
Anjali Tapadia
Appointed by District 5 Council Member
Chris Norby
Appointed by District 1 Council Member
Eric Walters
Appointed by District 2 Council Member
City Staff
Michael Plotnik, PE, TE
City of Fullerton, City Traffic Engineer
Jeff Chinchilla , PE, TE
City of Fullerton, Civil Engineer
Stephen Bise, PE, TE
City of Fullerton, Director of Public Works
4 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Project Overview
Chapter 2: Safety Analysis
Chapter 3: Engagement & Collaboration
Chapter 4: Opportunity Analysis
Chapter 6: Priority Projects
What is SS4A? 9
Project Goals 14
Project Schedule 15
About the City of Fullerton 16
Policy Context 18
Collision Analysis 28
Community & Public Engagement 38
Advisory Group Meetings 39
Community Input Meetings 41
Community Events 44
Survey Results 47
Opportunity Analysis 54
Top Opportunity Intersections and Corridors 57
Top Opportunity Neighborhoods 60
Roadways and Intersections 63
Signals 65
Pedestrian Facilities 67
Bicycle Facilities 69
Infrastructure Recommendations 72
Project Development & Prioritization 73
Concept Plans 75
Chapter 5: Countermeasures Toolbox
Chapter 7: Implementation & Next Steps
Project Costs 94
Policy & Process Recommendations 95
Implementation 96
Appendices
Appendix A: Engagement Materials 97
Appendix B: Proposed Treatments 123
Appendix C: Concept Engineering Designs 13 0
Appendix D: Nutwood Avenue Project 14 2
5 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Project Area 17
Figure 1.2 Proposed Bicycle Network 20
Figure 1.3 Proposed Pedestrian Recommendations 23
Figure 1.4 Proposed Bicycle Recommendations 23
Figure 1.5 Fullerton Bikeway Prioritization 25
Figure 1.6 Fullerton Pedestrian Focus Area 26
Figure 2.1 Fullerton Total Collisions by Year 28
Figure 2.2 Disproportionate Impact of Crashes on Road User Modes 29 Figure 2.3 Types of Collisions and Total Collisions vs. KSI Collisions 30 Figure 2.4 Disproportionate Impact of Crashes on Road User Modes 31 Figure 2.5 Collisions by Time of Day 32
Figure 2.8 KSI & Non-KSI Collisions 35
Figure 2.9 Hot Spot Locations 36
Figure 3.1 Traffic Safety Rating 48
Figure 3.2 Common Roadway Safety Issues 48
Figure 3.3 Preferred Roadway Safety Improvements 49
Figure 3.4 Traffic Safety Rating 50
Figure 3.5 Are These Key Treatments Positive Additions? 51 Figure 3.6 I think These Key Treatments are Positive Additions. 51 Figure 3.7 I would like to see speed feedback signage on Bastanchury Road between Brea Boulevard and the East City Limit. 52 Figure 3.8 I would like to see bike turn boxes at the intersection of Bastanchury Road and Brea Boulevard. 52 Figure 3.9 I would like to see a lane reconfiguration on Commonwealth Avenue between Library Lane and Balcom Avenue. 52 Figure 3.10 I would like to see a curb extension at the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and Lillie Avenue. 52 Figure 3.1 1 I would like to see a curb extension at the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and Yale Avenue. 53 Figure 3.12 I would like to see a hardened centerline at the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and Acacia Avenue. 53 Figure 3.13 I would like to see a rectangular rapid flashing beacon at the intersection of Richman Avenue and Elm Avenue. 53 Figure 3.14 I would like to see a stop sign and marking at the intersection of Ash Avenue and Jensen Way. 53 6 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
LIST OF FIGURES (cont.)
Figure 3.15 I think a scramble crosswalk is a positive addition to the intersection of State College Boulevard and Dorothy Lane. 53 Figure 3.16 I think a hardened centerline is a positive addition to the intersection of State College Boulevard and Dorothy Lane. 53 Figure 3.17 I think a gateway curb extension is a positive addition to the intersection of Citrus Avenue and Hill Avenue. 53 Figure 3.18 I think a rectangular rapid flashing beacon is a positive addition to the intersection of Citrus Avenue and Hill Avenue. 53 Figure 4.1 Top Opportunity Intersections 58
Figure 4.2 Priority Corridors 59
Figure 4.3 Top Opportunity Neighborhoods 61
Figure 6.1 Proposed Recommendations 72
Figure 6.2 Project Names and Prioritization 74
7 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Components of a SS4A Action Plan 12
Table 2.1 Top 10 Collision Intersections 33
Table 2.2 Top 10 Collision Corridors 34
Table 4.1 Top Opportunity Intersections & Scores 57
Table 4.2 Top Opportunity Corridors & Scores 57
Table 4.3 Top Opportunity Neighborhoods 60
Table 6.1 Project Names and Bounds 73
Table 7 .1 Summary of Estimated Costs by Project 94
`
CH 1.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
9 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
What is Safe Streets and
Road for All (SS4A)?
Plan Areas & Goals
The primary objective of the plan is to improve roadway safety by reducing the number of traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries. To achieve this, the plan addresses multiple key components of safety action planning, including:
• Assess existing policies and processes within the City to identify opportunities for enhancement and ensure
new efforts build upon, rather than duplicate previous
work.
• Data driven process to understand traffic safety
patterns, crash trends, and high injury networks.
• Collaboration among stakeholders, government
agencies, and community members to identify shared
priorities and build consensus around transportation
safety initiatives.
• Analyze the impacts of traffic safety on vulnerable
populations, including residents with limited access
to vehicles and those who rely on assisted mobility
devices.
• Identify priority project locations through analysis
of data, policies, and community input, and develop
targeted countermeasures and recommendations for
each site.
Transportation is an essential part of daily life in the City of Fullerton, shaping how residents access key destinations such as workplaces, schools, healthcare facilities, grocery stores, and their homes. The way people travel—whether by walking, biking, rolling, driving, or using public transit—is closely tied to the design and quality of the transportation system.
However, some routes in Fullerton present perceived
challenges to travelers due to various factors, including roadway design, surrounding land use, and traffic conditions.
These challenges can create obstacles to safe, convenient, and equitable mobility for all community members.
To address these challenges and enhance safety across the City’s streets, the City of Fullerton is developing a Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan (Plan). This initiative will provide a comprehensive framework to guide future transportation safety improvements and help create safer, more accessible streets for everyone.
This effort is part of a broader initiative supported by the federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant program and serves as a framework for developing key plan elements and securing future funding.
The City of Fullerton has a public commitment to
reduce roadway fatalities and serious injuries to zero by 2040 10 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Safe System Approach
The Safe System Approach, adopted by the U.S.
Department of Transportation (USDOT), is a
comprehensive roadway safety framework aimed at
reducing risk throughout the transportation system. It
focuses on preventing crashes and lessening their severity by recognizing both human error and physical vulnerability.
This approach promotes a multi-layered strategy that
includes safe infrastructure design, responsible human
behavior, effective industry practices, and efficient
emergency response.
11 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Planning Structure
To develop this Action Plan, an Advisory Group was formed to participate and review the process. Two other City of Fullerton boards also served as key structures in the development of this plan.
Advisory Group
Formed specifically for the
development of this action plan,
the Advisory Group is comprised
of seven members, all of whom are
residents and/or key stakeholders
within the City of Fullerton.
Active Transportation
Committee
The Active Transportation
Committee is a board within the
City of Fullerton which reviews
policies, plans and projects affecting
active transportation in the City
of Fullerton. The committee is
comprised of five members (one
seat is vacant at time of writing).
Members are residents of the City
of Fullerton whom are appointed by
council members.
Transportation and Circulation
Commission
The Transportation and Circulation
Commission is a board within the
City of Fullerton which acts in an
advisory capacity to the City Council
in the review and development of
systems, facilities, plans, policies
and programs that relate to public
transportation and circulation
within the City. The Commission is
comprised of five members of the
City of Fullerton and residents whom
are appointed by Council members.
12 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Question Response, Document
and Page Number
1. Leadership Commitment and
Goal Setting
Are BOTH of the following true?
• A high-ranking official and/or governing body in the jurisdiction publicly committed to an eventual goal of zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries; and
• The commitment includes either setting a target date to reach zero OR setting one or more targets to achieve a reduction in roadway fatalities and serious injuries by a specific date.
Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 9
2. Planning Structure To develop the Action Plan, was a committee, task force, implementation group, or similar body established and charged with the plan’s development, implementation, and monitoring? Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 11
3. Safety Analysis Does the Action Plan include ALL of the following? • Analysis of existing conditions and historical trends to provide a baseline level of crashes involving fatalities and serious injuries across a jurisdiction, locality, Tribe, or region;
• Analysis of the location(s) of crashes, the severity, contributing factors, and crash types;
• Analysis of systemic and specific safety needs, as needed (e.g., high-risk road features or specific safety needs of relevant road users); and,
• A geospatial identification (geographic or locational data using maps) of higher risk locations.
Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 27 - 36
Components of a SS4A Action Plan
Table 1.1 Components of a SS4A Action Plan
13 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Question Response, Document
and Page Number
4. Engagement and Collaboration Did development of the Action Plan include ALL of the following activities?
• Engagement with the public and relevant stakeholders, including the private sector and community groups;
• Incorporation of information received from the engagement and collaboration into the plan; and
• Coordination that included inter- and intra-governmental cooperation and collaboration, as appropriate.
Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 37 - 53
5. Policy and Process Changes Are BOTH of the following true? • The plan development included an assessment of current policies, plans, guidelines, and/or standards to identify opportunities to improve how processes prioritize safety; and
• The plan discusses implementation through the adoption of revised or new policies, guidelines, and/or standards.
Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 18 - 26, 95
6. Strategy and Project Selections Does the plan identify a comprehensive set of projects and strategies to address the safety problems in the Action Plan, with information about time ranges when projects and strategies will be deployed, and an explanation of project prioritization criteria?
Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 54 - 61, 96
7. Progress and Transparency Does the plan include BOTH of the following? • A description of how progress will be measured over time that includes, at a minimum, outcome data.
• The plan is posted publicly online.
Yes
Fullerton SS4A Action
Plan, pg. 95
14 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Goal of this Action Plan
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) established the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) discretionary program, providing $5 billion in funding over five years from 2022 to 2026. The SS4A program supports the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Roadway Safety Strategy and our goal of zero roadway deaths using a Safe System Approach. The SS4A program funds regional initiatives through grants to prevent roadway fatalies and serious injuries.
Eliminating Traffic Fatalities & Serious
Injuries
Promoting Transportation Safety for All
Enhancing Data-Driven Decision-Making
Improving Collaboration & Stakeholder
Engagement
Identifying & Prioritizing Safety Investments
Advancing Systemic & Proactive Safety
Measures
The SS4A program prioritizes safety
improvements that prevent deaths and
severe injuries for all road users.
Addressing disparities in traffic safety
by prioritizing support and interventions
for historically underserved and high-risk
communities.
Utilizing crash data, GIS analysis, and
safety assessments to identify more
vulnerable locations and develop targeted
countermeasures.
Encouraging partnerships between local
governments, transportation agencies,
community organizations, and the public,
to develop effective safety strategies.
Laying the groundwork for implementing
safety improvements through funding
opportunities, including future SS4A
implementation grants.
Moving beyond reactive safety
improvements by adopting systemic
strategies, such as speed management,
road diets, and intersection safety
enhancements.
15 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Project Schedule
16 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
COMMUTING PATTERNS
0.7% BIKE
72.1%
DRIVE ALONE
10.6% CARPOOL
11.3%
WORK FROM HOME
0.9% TAXI, MOTORCYCLE, OTHER
1.7% WALK
2.7% PUBLIC TRANSIT
142,280
POPULATION
$99,279
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD
INCOME
36%
OF THE POPULATION IS
UNDER 18 OR
OVER 65 YEARS OLD
RACE & ETHNICITY
HISPANIC OR LATINO: 37.8%
WHITE, NON -HISPANIC: 29.3%
ASIAN: 26.4%
TWO OR MORE RACES: 3.6%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN: 2.1%
OTHER RACE: 0.5%
AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE: 0.2%
NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER: 0.1%
Decennial Census 2020
About the City of Fullerton
The City of Fullerton is located in northern Orange County within the Greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, approximately 25 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles. It is bordered by Anaheim to the south, Buena Park to the west, La Habra/Brea to the north, and Placentia to the east. The city is well-connected through major transportation networks, including Riverside Freeway (SR-91), Orange Freeway (SR-57), and Santa Ana
Freeway (I-5), which provide regional east-west and north-south access. The Fullerton Transportation Center is also a key stop for Metrolink commuter rail as well as Amtrak rail services. The Metrolink Orange County and 91/Perris Valley have stops at this station, offering commuter rail service to Los Angeles, Riverside, and beyond. The Amtrak Pacific Surfliner and Southwest Chief offer intercity rail services to destinations throughout Southern California and beyond. The Amtrak Pacific Surfliner travels along the Southern California coastline, connecting San Diego and San Luis Obispo. The Southwest Chief is a long-distance passenger train connecting Chicago and Los Angeles. Local and regional transit is provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).
The City of Fullerton is an important education hub, home to California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) and Fullerton College. The City has a diverse economic base that includes healthcare, education, technology, and manufacturing industries, with strong connections to the broader Southern California economy. Downtown Fullerton serves as a cultural and
commercial center, featuring a mix of historic preservation and modern development.
17 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 1.1 Project Area
18 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Policy Context
The City of Fullerton is committed to providing its residents with access to safe, practical, and quality transportation facilities. The City continues to collaborate and coordinate with local stakeholders, neighboring municipalities, and regional agencies to develop policies and recommendations consistent with the region’s end goal to create a sustainable, multi-modal transportation system. The following are the planning policies, guidelines, and related projects fundamental to the development of the City’s multi-modal Safety Action Plan.
CITY OF FULLERTON GENERAL PLAN (2012)
The City of Fullerton outlined its long-
term vision in the General Plan in 2012.
The Fullerton SS4A Action Plan will
supplement the following General Plan
goals and policies that call out for a safer
built environment that encourages all
modes of transportation:
City of Fullerton Community Development
Element
• Community Development Policy
P1.4: “Connection and Integration
of Uses”
• Community Development Policy
P1.13: “Universal Design”
City of Fullerton Mobility Element
• Mobility Element Goal: “A
balanced system promoting
transportation alternatives that
enable mobility and an enhanced
quality of life.”
• Mobility Element Policy P5.2:
“Reduction of Single Occupant
Vehicle Trips”
• Mobility Element Policy P5.6:
“Quality Highways and Roads”
• Mobility Element Policy P5.7:
“Complete Streets”
• Mobility Element Policy P5.8:
“Maximization of Person-Trips”
[over Vehicle-Trips]
City of Fullerton Bicycle Element
• Bicycle Element Goal: “A bicycle-
friendly city where bicycling is a
safe and convenient alternative
to motorized transportation and
a recreational opportunity for
people of all ages and abilities.”
• Bicycle Element Policy P6.1:
“Consideration of Bicyclists”
• Bicycle Element Policy
P6.5: “Bicycling Safety and
Convenience”
• Bicycle Element Policy P6.6:
“Safe Travel to Key Destinations”
• Bicycle Element Policy P6.8:
“Multi-Tiered Bicycle Network”
• Bicycle Element Policy P6.9:
“Intersection Safety”
• Bicycle Element Policy P6.12:
“Bicycle Parking and Facilities”
2030
THE FULLERTON PLAN
The Fullerton
Natural
Environment
The Fullerton
Built
Environment
The Fullerton
Economy
The Fullerton
Community
Adopted May 1, 2012
19 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CITY OF FULLERTON BICYCLE MASTER PLAN (2012)
The Plan establishes the goal of a
bicycle-friendly city where bicycling
is a safe and convenient alternative
to motorized transportation and a
recreational opportunity for people of all
ages and abilities. The Plan includes the
following policies that pertain to roadway
safety:
• Bicycle Plan Policy P1: Support
regional and subregional efforts to
ensure bicyclists are considered
when developing new or retrofitting
existing transportation facilities and
systems.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P2: Support
efforts to maintain, expand and
create new connections between the
Fullerton bicycle network and the
bicycle networks of adjacent cities,
Orange County, and the region.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P4: Support
projects, programs, policies, and
regulations to recognize that every
street in Fullerton is a street that a
bicyclist can use.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P5: Support
projects, programs, policies, and
regulations that make bicycling safer
and more convenient for all types of
bicyclists.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P6: Support
projects, programs, policies, and
regulations to facilitate safe travel by
bicycle to key destinations within the
community and larger region.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P7: Support
projects, programs, policies,
and regulations to reduce
negative impacts to, and increase
opportunities for, bicycle users and
the bicycle network in private and
public development projects.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P9: Support
projects, programs, policies, and
regulations support the safe and
efficient movement of bicyclists
through and across intersections.
• Bicycle Plan Policy P14: Support
projects, programs, policies,
and regulations to consider
bicycle friendly design using
new technologies and innovative
treatments.
The Plan proposes new bicycle off-street
paths in the central and north parts of
the City, which connect to Buena Park,
La Habra, and Brea. Bike lanes are
proposed on portions of Artesia Avenue,
Orangethorpe Avenue, Placentia Avenue,
Valencia Mesa Drive, and other streets.
Figure 1.2 on the following page shows
the proposed network.
The Plan development included outreach
activities where members of the public
identified issues with safety, which
included:
• Roadway users disregarding the
rules of the road
• Bike lanes providing a false sense of
security
• Debris in bike lanes
• Intersection and driveway conflicts
Members of the public also expressed a
desire for:
• Multilingual education on rider safety
• Youth and parent education
• Public awareness campaigns to
inform drivers that bicycles are
allowed on all streets in Fullerton
• Consistent signage
• Bikeways through City parks
• Safer opportunities to cross State
Route 57
• Sharrows wherever applicable
• Bike signal push buttons
20 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 1.2 Proposed Bicycle Network
CITY OF
BREA
Commonwealth Ave
Wilshire Ave
Commonwealth Ave
Pioneer Ave
Chapman Ave
Union Pacific Right-of-Way
Valley View Dr
Berkeley Ave
Chapman Ave
Nutwood Ave
Victoria Dr
Riverside Dr
Dorothy Ln
Bastanchury Rd
Rolling Hills Dr Rolling Hills Dr
Yorba Linda Blvd
Madison
Ave
Brea Blvd
Hermosa Dr
Bastanchury RdValencia Mesa Dr
Artesia Ave
Rosecrans Ave
Malvern Ave
Hughes Dr Warburton WyBenchley St
Castlewood Dr
Valencia Dr
Valencia Dr
Southgate Ave
Roberta Ave Baker Ave
Hill Ave
Orangethorpe Ave Orangethorpe Ave
Olive Ave
Magnolia Ave
Gilbert St
Basque Ave
Richman Ave Richman Ave
Highland Ave
Euclid St
Euclid St
Lakeview Dr
Laguna Rd
Woods Ave
Puente St
Harbor Blvd
Harbor Blvd
Sunnycrest Dr
State College BlvdState College Blvd
Placentia Ave
Placentia Ave
Harbor Blvd
Associated Rd
Pomona Ave
Lemon St
Longview Dr
Lemon St
Raymond Ave
State Hwy 57
Acacia Ave
Brookhurst Rd
Gilbert St
Sunny Ridge Dr
Parks Rd
CITY OF
PLACENTIA
CITY OF
BUENA PARK
CITY OF
LA MIRADA
CITY OF
LA HABRA
CITY OF ANAHEIM
33 3
25 School
City of Fullerton Bicycle Master Plan
Proposed Class I Bike Path
Proposed Class II Bike Lane
Proposed Class III Bike Route
Potential Bike Boulevard
Existing Facilities
Proposed Bikeway Improvements with School Locations
Exhibit 5.2
Legend
Map not to a scale
´
Amendments pursuant to General Plan Revision adopted July 12, 2011 by Resolution 2011-31 incorporated by reference. 21 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CITY OF FULLERTON LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (2022)
The City of Fullerton Local Roadway
Safety Plan (LRSP) was developed
to identify areas where safety
improvements are needed based on
collision data, geometric conditions,
policies, and other considerations.
The LRSP took a systemic approach
to creating a safe roadway network,
while identifying individual locations
where specific countermeasures and
improvements can help meet that goal.
The LRSP used an analysis period of
2014 to 2019.
The collision assessment found that the
top locations in the City where the most
collisions took place are:
• Euclid St at Orangethorpe Ave
• Harbor Blvd at Orangethorpe Ave
• Placentia Ave at Yorba Linda Blvd
• Magnolia Ave at Orangethorpe Ave
• Commonwealth Ave at Chapman Ave
• Lemon Ave at Orangethorpe Ave
• Harbor Blvd at Chapman Ave
• Harbor Blvd at Commonwealth Ave
• Harbor Blvd at Houston Ave
• Harbor Blvd at Orangefair Ave
The roads that contain the corridors with
the most collisions are:
• Orangethorpe Ave
• Harbor Blvd
• Brookhurst Rd
The collision assessment findings
include:
• Fullerton ranks highly among cities
of its size for Driving Under the
Influence-related crashes
• Fullerton ranks highly among cities
of its size for pedestrian fatalities
• Most collisions take place during
daytime hours
• Pedestrian, bicycle, and
motorcycle collisions represent a
disproportionate share of fatal and
severe-injury collisions
• Broadside collisions are the most
common type at intersections, while
rear-end collisions are the most
common type at non-intersection
locations
• Downtown Fullerton has a high
number of collision totals
City of Fullerton
Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
August 19, 2022
Data Driven
Best Practices
Systemic Approach
22 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
DOWNTOWN FULLERTON ON THE GO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2022) • The objective of the plan is to
connect more people with jobs,
goods, services, and public transit
networks without or with less use
of a car. The document proposes
infrastructure and programmatic
recommendations to enhance
walking and biking, including
specific projects and policies.
The plan outlines several notable
recommendations for enhancing
active transportation in Downtown
Fullerton.
• Bicycle Network: The plan proposes
an additional 47 miles of new and
upgraded bikeways in Downtown
Fullerton. These include Class I bike
paths, Class II bike lanes, buffered
bike lanes, Class III bike routes, and
separated bikeways.
• Pedestrian Priority District:
Designating Downtown Fullerton as
a Pedestrian Priority District (PPD)
to prioritize pedestrian mobility and
allow flexibility in city standards to
better accommodate walking.
• Intersection Improvements: Specific
improvements are suggested for
key intersections. For example,
increasing pedestrian crossing
times and installing protected left-
turn signals at Harbor Boulevard
and Commonwealth Avenue. Also,
a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB)
is recommended for installation at
Harbor Boulevard and Ellis Place.
• Lighting Upgrades: Upgrading
existing lighting at grade-separated
roadways near the railroad
tracks and improving lighting at
intersections and along roadway
segments to enhance pedestrian
visibility and safety.
• Accessibility Improvements:
Improving access to pedestrian
push buttons to make them ADA
accessible.
• Wayfinding: Installing a wayfinding
system with signs and pavement
markings to guide people to key
destinations.
Figures 1.3 and 1.4, on the following
page, show pedestrian and bicycle
improvements under consideration as
part of the plan.
23 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 1.3 Proposed Pedestrian Recommendations Figure 1.4 Proposed Bicycle Recommendations Fullerton On The Go | Infrastructure Recommendations 87 "
!
VALENCIA DR
E V A E G I R E M A
E V A M O C L A B
O L S U R T W E V A
T S D I L C U E
ELM
VIA
E V A E R I H S L I W
A E W N O M M O CL E V A H T
A I V T U N L A W
MALVERN AVE
E V A N A M P A H C
LEMON HILL TER
E V A D N O M Y A R
DRAKE
AVE
E V A D O O W N E L G
E V A D R O F
E V A N E
D L A M
UNION AVE
L I H A L VE
E V A E C N E R W A L
O R B L P E L A D K O
FERN DR
GRANDVIEW AVE
E V
A
S D O O W
HILLCRESTDR
POMONAAVE
LEMON ST
E V A E G N A R O
L P A M O O W E D A E V
E V A T S E W
E V A P P E N K
L E M A E V
LONGVIEW DR
E V A N L O C N I L
N V A D O O W T UE
A I V N O M E L
N L Y D O L E M
E V A G N I T I H W
A E V A H S
E V A N A M H C I R
LUANNE
AVE
HIGHLAND AVE
PATTERSON WAY
VALLEY VIEW DR
YALE AVE
E V A T U N L A W
N L Y N O M R A H
MAGNOLIA
E V A N O T E C N I R P
E V A L L E N R O C
N O S M A I L L I WA E V
S S O R E V A N N Y L
A E F A T N A SE V
L P A D N A R A C A J
FREEDOM AVE
E V A Y E L E K R E B
ELDORADO
DR
E V A D R O F N A T S
R I C N O T E C N I R P
GLENHAVEN AVE
HARBOR BLVD
R O P T E V A R E
SHEPPARD
DR
N L Y H T O R O D
PINE VIA
OC E AN
VIEW
D
R
E T A G H T U O SE V A
NUTW
OO
D
PL
PRIVATEDR
Byerrum Park
Fullerton Museum Center
Ford
Park
Independence
Park
Lemon
Park
Nicolas
Park
Richman
Park
Downtown Plaza
Plaza
Park
Muckenthaler
Cultural
Center
Lions Field
Hillcrest
Park
Hiltscher
Park
Amerige
Park
Golden Hill
School Park
Union
Pacific Park
Fullerton
Union High
School
Fullerton
College
ELLIS PL
VE
F
k
Lighting Improvement
Pedestrian Signal
Improvement
No Right-Turn on Red
Crosswalk Improvement Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
Pedestrian Recommendations
CITY OF FULLERTON, CA
City Boundary
Core Area
Pedestrian Access (1/2 Mile)
Park or Golf Course
School
´
0 750 1,500
Feet
Accessibility Improvement
Figure 18. Map of Site-Specific Pedestrian Recommendations Fullerton On The Go | Infrastructure Recommendations 71 ¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ ¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ 91 57
57 91
N E L A V C R D A I
M A E V A E G I R E
S K Y L I N E D R
D N I L A B R O Y D V L B A
L S U R T E V A W O
L A E W N O M M O C E V A H T
EUCLID ST
L O S C O Y O T E S D R
R O M N E Y A D R
M
EL RO
S E
S T
RAYMOND AVE
BREA BLVD
MADISON AVE
E V A N A M P A H C
H I L L A V E
L A S P A L M A S D R
WOODS AVE
ACACIA AVE
STATE COLLEGE BL VD
L A G U N A
RD
LEMON ST
A R B OLA DODR
C A M I N O
D E L S OL
OAK A E V
E V A P P E N K
E V E R G R E E N A V E
HOUSTON AVE
BASQUE AVE
R O T E G N A P R O H E V A E
E V A E R I H S L I W
HERMOSA DR
CA M P U S D R
MAGNOLIA AVE
N L Y H T O R O D
BASTANCHURY RD
COYOTE HILLS DR
E L M S T
BIRCH ST
VALENCIA MESA DR
HIGHLAND AVE
DALE ST
TER R A Z A
P L
RICHM
AN
AVE
R D W E I V Y E L L A V
R O S E C R A N S A V E
ASSO
CIATED
RD
R D S L L I H G N I L L O R
DOMINGO RD
P LA C E N T IA
A V E
B A K E R A V E
WI I L L O S M A N AVE
GILBER T
ST
R D R A M A R I M
LAKEVIEW DR
E V A T U N L A W
R D N R E F
B E R K E L E Y A V E
SOUTHGATE AVE
VICTORIA DR
PUENTE ST
HARBOR BLVD
K RAEM
ER
BLVD
N O I P V A R E E E
R E B M I K A Y L E V
BURNING
TREE
RD
BEACH BLVD
Y W H L A I R E P M I
BROOKHURST RD
MALVERN AVE
BREA
M
A L L D R
LAMBERT RD
A R T E S I A A V E
Fullerton
Creek
Greenbelt
Chapman Park
Emery
Park
Fullerton
Arboretum
Fullerton
Sports
Complex
Gilman Park
Virgil "Gus"
Grissom Park
Independence
Park
Lemon Park
Rolling
Hills Park
Vista Park
West
Coyote Hills
Tree Park
West Coyote
Hills
Park
Edward
H. White
II Park
Ralph B.
Clark Park
Brea
Dam Park
Coyote Hills
Golf Course
Golfers
Paradise
Fullerton
City Golf
Course
Craig
Regional
Park
Muckenthaler
Cultural
Center
Lions Field
Hillcrest
Park
Bastanchury
Park
Hiltscher
Park
Robert
E Ward Nature
Preserve
Panorama
Nature
Preserve
Tri City
Park
Amerige Park
Gilbert Park
Acacia Park
Beechwood
School Park
Parks
School Park
Laguna
Lake Park
Laguna Lake
Recreation Park
Ladera
Vista
School Park
Commonwealth
School ParkPaci c Drive
School Park
Sunny
Hills High
School
Troy High
School
Fullerton Union
High School
Buena
Park High
School
California
State
University
Sonora
High
School
Fullerton
College
0 0.5 1
Miles
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike LaneClass III Bike Route
Class IIIB Bike Boulevard
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Long-Term Future Study
Corridor
Trail
EXISTING & PROPOSED BICYCLE NETWORK
CITY OF FULLERTON, CA
Intersection Improvement
Bike/Ped Bridge
City Boundary
Core Area
Pedestrian Access (1/2 Mile)
Bicycle Access (2 Miles)
Park or Golf Course
School
Existing | Proposed
CORE AREA
Ford
Park
Truslow Park
Plaza Park
Amerige Park
Union
Pacific
Park
MALDEN AVE
TRUSLOW AVE
POMONA AVE
POMONA
AVE
HARBOR
BLVD
WILSHIRE AVE
TRUSLOW
AVE
FORD AVE
LAWRENCE AVE
MALDEN AVE
HIGHLAND AVE
LIBRARY LN
ELLIS PL
MALVERN AVE
LEMON STRICHMAN AVE
LAWRENCEAVE
COLLEGE
PL
NEWELL PL
WHITING AVE
W
A
L N U T
W
A Y
HIGHLAND AVERICHMAN AVE
WALNUT AVE
ELLIS LN
PATTERSON
WAY
TRUSLOW AVE
COMMONWEALTH AVE
AMERIGE AVE
C H A P M A N A V E
SANTA FE AVE
JACARANDA PL
Fullerton
Union High
School
Florence
Crittenton
School
Berkeley
School
Fullerton First
United Methodist
Preschool
Fullerton
College
Figure 17. Recommended Bicycle Projects
24 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
OCTA LONG RANGE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
(2022)
The OCTA Long Range Transportation
Plan outlines the system-level vision for
Orange County’s transportation network
out to the year 2045.
The Plan identifies the following safety
concerns:
• At-grade rail crossings
• Poor pavement conditions posing
safety issues for cyclists
The following types of projects are
recommended in the Plan to address
safety issues:
• Signal synchronization
• Active Transportation Investments
The development of the Plan included
outreach efforts including surveys. The
majority of respondents agreed that
“Improving the efficiency and safety of
roads and freeways is becoming more
important as an alternative to major
widening projects as state regulations
and limited land availability are making it
more difficult to add new lanes.”
The OCTA Master Plan of Arterial
Highways designates certain major
roadways in Orange County under a set
of classifications. The Plan exists to
ensure consistency along roadways that
serve regional traffic and pass through
multiple jurisdictions. “Major” roadways
in Fullerton include:
• Brea Boulevard between Imperial
Highway and Harbor Boulevard
• Euclid Street between Imperial
Highway and Bastanchury Road
• Harbor Boulevard between Berkeley
Avenue and Lambert Road
• Bastanchury Road between Malvern
Avenue and Valencia Avenue
• State College Boulevard between
Imperial Highway and Lincoln
Avenue
The OC Active Report is a comprehensive
Active Transportation Plan covering
Orange County. The Report provides a
framework for bikeway and pedestrian
planning across the county and
is compliant with statewide ATP
requirements. The Plan analyzes each
city within the County, including Fullerton.
Figure 1.5 shows the bikeway
prioritization categorized into short-,
medium-, and long-term in the Active
Report. And Figure 1.6 shows designated
pedestrian focus areas within the City
based on a pedestrian priority model.
OCTA MASTER PLAN OF
ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
(2024)
OC ACTIVE REPORT (2019)
DECEMBER 2019
Prepared for: Orange County Transportation Authority
Prepared by: IBI Group with KTUA, PlaceWorks, and Arellano Associates ORANGE
COUNTY’S
BIKE + PED
PLAN
2024
Master Plan
of Arterial
Highways
ORANGE COUNTY
California
-2
2 -2
-2
-2
-2 -2 1 1
-1
1 -2
-1 -2
2 -
1 -2
1 -1
2 2 -
-2 1
L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y
-2
-2
1 1
1 2 2
1 -2 1
-2
-1
O R A N G E C O U N T Y
2 -2
1 -1 -2
2 -2
-2
-2
2 1
-1
2 S A N
-1 2
2 -2
2 -2 -2
-2 -2 2
2 B E R
-2
1 2 1
1 1
1 -2
-2 -2
1 -2
2 O
2 - 2 1
2 -2
2 -
1 1 - -1
R
-2
-2
2 -2
2 -2
2 2
2 2 -1
-2 -2
N
2 -2
1 -1
2 1
-2 -2 2
-2
2 - -2
A N
-1
1 -1 -2 -1
-2
-1 -2 -2
1 -2
1 A R
-2
-2
1 1
2 4
-1 2
-1
2 -2
-1
1 G
1 -
-1
1 -2
-2
-1
2 3 2
2 1
E
1 2
-2 1 1 -2 1
1 2
2 2
-2
D
-2 -1
-1
1 -2 -1
1 1
1 -
-1
-
I
1 2 -
-2
-2 2
-1 -2
-2 -1
C
2 -2
-1
1 -
-1
2 -2 -2 -1
2 2
O
-2
1 -1 -2
-1
1 2 1
-2
-1
-2
-2
N
-2
2 -2
-2 -2 2
1 -2
2 1
2 -2
-1
O
-2 -1
-2
-2
2 -2
2 -2
2 -1
-1
2 U
-2 -2
-1
-2
-2
1 2 1
2 2
-1 4 -
N
1 -1
-1
1 -2 2
1 -2 -2
1 -2
C
2 2
1 2
2 -2
2 1
-2
-2
2 -
-2
O
-2
-2
-2
-2
2 1
1 2
1 -2
2 -1
T Y
2 - 2
-1
-2
1 -1 -2
2 2 -1
-2
U
-4
-1
-2
-2 -2 -2
-2
-2
-2 2 - -1
N
1 - -1
-2
-1 -2 -2 -2
-2
-2 -2 -1
T Y
-1 2 -
-1 -1
2 -2 2
-1
1 2 1
-2
R I
2 1 -2
1 -
-2
-2 -1 1
2 2
V E R S I
1 1
2 -1
-2
-
2 - -1
1 -
2 -2 O R A N G E C O U N T Y
-2
-2
-1
-2 1
2 -1 -1
-2 -2
-1
D E C O U N T Y
-1
-2 -2
-2 -2
-1 -2
-
-2 -2
1 -1 -2
C O U N T Y
-2
-1
2 2
-2 - 1
1 -
2 2
C O U N T Y
- -2
-2 -2
-2 2 -
2 O R A N G E
2 1
4 -1 2
-
R I V E R S I D E
-
2 - 1
S A N D I E G O C O U N T Y
2 O R A N G E C O U N T Y
1 2 1 2
1 -
1 2
2 - 1
2 1 2
1 2 2
- -1 -4
1 1 2
3 -
1 -2 2 2 - 1 -
2 1 1
2 -1 -2 -1
-2
2 - 1 2 1 2
1 -2
2 -1
2 2 -1
1 2 2
1 2 2 1 - 2
2 -2
2 -1
1 2
-2
-
2 - 1
-2
- 1
1 2 -2
-1
1 -2 2
-2
2 1 -2
2 1
-2
2 -2
-2
-2
-1
-2 2
-2
-2 1 -1
1 -
1 2 -
-2 -2
2 -
-1
-1
-2 -2
-2 -1
2 2
-2
- 1
-1 2
-2 -1
-1
2 -2
-3 -4
-2
1 1
2 2
& %o(
-2
2 1
1 2 1
-2
-1
1 2 1 -2
1 % &l(
?ê
2 2 -
-2
-
-2
-2
?l
1 2
1 2
-1
-2 -2
-2
1 2
1 2
2 ?k
-2
A£
*
Black label i
* Unconst
*** More l
ruct
cates overbuilt segments.
t
-1
-
1 -2
1 -
2 2
1 2
-2
1 3
1 1
2 * Figures show lane difference between MPAH classification and constructed lanes.
Red label indicates roadway segment is underbuilt to MPAH classification. ndi
-
2 2
-2
2 2
1 1
2 -2
ed roadway alignmen s may no
in one direction than the other.
t be finalized.
-2
1 2
1 -2
LEGEND
ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
CONSTRUCTED UNCONSTRUCTED
ROADWAYS * ROADWAYS **
PRINCIPAL
MAJOR
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
DIVIDED COLLECTOR
COLLECTOR
Yellow highlight indicates asymmetric lane configuration***
ROADS OUTSIDE OF OC
SHOWN FOR CONTINUITY
ARTERIAL CAPACITIES
FREEWAY / TOLL ROAD
PRINCIPAL (Divided)
8 Lane Symmetric: 45,000 to 60,000 ADT
SMART STREET 8 LANE 9 Lane Asymmetric: 50,600 to 67,500 ADT SMART STREET 6 LANE MAJOR (Divided)
6 Lane Symmetric: 33,900 to 45,000 ADT
SMART STREET 4 LANE 7 Lane Asymmetric: 39,500 to 52,500 ADT EXISTING PROPOSED PRIMARY (Divided)
FREEWAY / TOLL ROAD 4 Lane Symmetric: 22,500 to 30,000 ADT ! !( INTERCHANGES 5 Lane Asymmetric: 28,100 to 37,500 ADT( SECONDARY (Undivided)
RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVE 4 Lane Symmetric: 15,000 to 20,000 ADT 5 Lane Asymmetric: 18,800 to 25,000 ADT
NOTES:
-2
-
1 2
-2
-2
-
1 2
A»
!"^$
-
2 2
2 1
2 2
2 -1
-2
-2
2 -2
-2
-2
-2
DIVIDED COLLECTOR
2 Lane Symmetric: 9,000 to 15,000 ADT
3 Lane Asymmet : 13,500 to 22,500 ADTric
-2
-1
-2
-2
2024
Master Plan
of Arterial
Highways
ORANGE COUNTY
California
A»
-1
-2
A»
-1
A¾
-1
-2
!"a$
AÊ
2 Aß
!"^$
% &l(
A¾
A¥
!"^$
Map Publication Date: July 2024
anes
Freeways / Toll Roads shown for reference purposes only.
COLLECTOR (Undivided)
2 Lane Symmetric: 7,500 to 10,000 ADT
3 Lane Asymmetric: 11,300 to 15,000 ADT Z
0 2.5 5
Miles
Source: OCTA
OO!!ssww3333ttss3333mmaaCChhaarrlleess
25 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 1.5 Fullerton Bikeway Prioritization
FULLERTON
PALM
BREA
ROSECRANS
EUCLID
NUTWOOD
PLACENTIA
MALVERN
ACACIA
HARBOR
BROOKHURST
IMPERIAL
BASTANCHURY
LEMON
PLACENTIA
BRADFORD
IMPERIAL
STATE COLLEGE
PIONEER
RAYMOND
MAGNOLIA ORANGETHORPE
VALENCIA
BERKELEY
GILBERT
COMMONWEALTH
YORBA LINDA
ASSOCIATED
BEACH
CHAPMAN
PARKS
ORANGETHORPE
HIGHLAND
LAMBERT
DALE
VALENCIA
WOODS ¬26
¬41¬50
¬76
¬36
¬15
¬77
¬5¬67
¬54 ¬53
¬19
¬83
¬78¬74
¬21
¬31
¬75 ¬72
¬56
¬3
¬58
¬44
¬12
¬35
¬73
¬33
¬37
¬85
¬63
¬8
¬68
¬55
¬69
¬24
¬80
¬70
¬18
¬42
¬20
¬29
¬65
¬43
¬30
¬34
¬62
¬6
¬38
¬61
¬48
¬46
¬1
¬49
¬4
¬64
¬28
¬47
¬84
¬32
¬17
¬45
¬60
¬79
¬57
¬71
¬27
¬13
¬81
¬66
¬14
¬22
¬51
¬2
¬52
¬10
¬40
¬81
¬10
¬51
¬66
¬52
¬39
¬84
¬59
¬40
¬40
¬23
¬82
¬4
¬62
¬13
¬24
¬64
¬6¬7
¬9
¬10
¬11
¬14
¬16
¬25
ANAHEIM
BREA
BUENA PARK
PLACENTIA
LA HABRA
LOS ANGELES
|ÿ91
|ÿ91
|ÿ57
§¨¦
5 [
Bikeway Prioritization:
Fullerton
Bicycle Master Plan Priority
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
0 0.5 1
Mi
26 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 1.6 Fullerton Pedestrian Focus Area
Los Angeles
County
PALM
WHITAKER
BREA
EUCLID
PLACENTIA
MALVERN
ACACIA
HARBOR
MADISON
BROOKHURST
IMPERIAL
BASTANCHURY
LEMON
PLACENTIA
BRADFORD
STATE COLLEGE
PIONEER
RAYMOND
MAGNOLIA
ORANGETHORPE
VALENCIA
GILBERT
BERKELEY
COMMONWEALTH
YORBA LINDA
ASSOCIATED
BEACH
CHAPMAN
PARKS
HIGHLANDDALE
VALENCIA
ORANGETHORPE
ROSECRANS
ANAHEIM
BREA
BUENA PARK
PLACENTIA
LA HABRA
FULLERTON
|ÿ91
|ÿ91
|ÿ57
§¨¦
5 OC Active Pedestrian Focus Area
Modeling Results (March 2018):
Fullerton
High Composite Score
Low Composite Score
[
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
27 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CH 2.
SAFETY ANAL YSIS
28 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 2.1 Fullerton Total Collisions by Year
2020
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2019 2021 2022 2023 2024
940
837
1,203 1,235
1,042 1,025
15 27 32 28 29
392 598
All
KSI
20 Collision Analysis
The collision trend analysis shows trends from June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2024, as it is reflective of the existing conditions that were considered during the development of the Plan.
Crossroads collision data was provided by the City. During these five years, a total of 5,292 collisions occurred on city roadways.
Figure 2.1 shows that the annual number of collisions from June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2024.
There was a peak in collisions in 2022 followed by a period of decline. For 2024, the total number of collisions has been estimated based on current trends.
YEAR TREND
Each year in Fullerton, an average of 30 people are killed or seriously injured (KSI), while traveling on our roads.
29 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
ALL COLLISIONS
SEVERE INJURY COLLISIONS
FA TAL COLLISIONS
20%0% 40% 60% 80% 100%
People
driving
People
riding bikes
People
walking
Figure 2.2 Disproportionate Impact of Crashes on Road User Modes Collisions involving people walking and biking in Fullerton are much more likely to result in fatality or severe injury than collisions involving only people driving.
WHO IS INVOLVED?
Crashes that result in death or serious injury disproportionately impact vulnerable road users—that is, those who are outside of a vehicle like people walking and biking.
Vulnerable road users also include people using wheelchairs and other mobility assistance devices, as well as electric bikes and scooters.
30 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
1,569
443
855
38 91
27 1,137
797
3352.8%
2.0% 2.2%
4.4%
3.7%
0.8% 0.4%
13.7%
Broadside Head-On Hit Object Not Stated Other Overturned Rear-End Sideswipe Vehicle- Pedestrian
Total # KSI %
Figure 2.3 Types of Collisions and Total Collisions vs. KSI Collisions WHICH COLLISIONS ARE MOST DANGEROUS?
Figure 2.3 compares the percent of fatal or seriously injured (KSI) collisions for each collision type with the total number of collisions for each type. The total number of collisions is categorized by collision type, as represented by the gray bars in the chart (see y-axis on the left side). Broadsides accounted for the largest category, comprising 29.6 percent of total collisions.
The categories with the second and third highest amount of collisions, as shown in the chart below, were rear-end and hit object at 21.5 percent and 16.2 percent of total collisions, respectively.
The green line in the chart shows the percentage of each collision type that resulted in fatalities or severe injuries (see the y-axis on the right side). The labeled percentages represent the KSI collision percentages of each collision type. For example, as high as 30 percent of the pedestrian-related collisions were KSI collisions, 8.3 percent of the overturned collisions led to fatalities and severe injuries. In contrast, sideswipe and rear- end collisions were reported with less than one percent fatal or seriously injured victims.
31 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Auto R/W Violation
Driving Under Influence
Improper Turning
Unsafe Speed
Traffic Signals and Signs
Other Improper Driving
Unsafe Starting or Backing
Ped R/W Violation
Pedestrian Violation
Wrong Side of Road
Unsafe Lane Change
19.1%
16.7%
14.7%
13.9%
7.9%
6.0%
2.7%
2.3%
2.2%
1.9%
1.5%
14.8%
16.3%
6.7%
3.0%
3.0%
3.7%
3.0%
0.0%
2.2%
16.3%
3.0%
Total % KSI %
Figure 2.4 Disproportionate Impact of Crashes on Road User Modes WHAT ARE THE LEADING CAUSES?
Figure 2.4 summarizes the Primary Collision Factor (PCF) for all the collisions in the past five years. PCF is the leading cause of a collision based on the law enforcement officer's opinion who conducted the investigation. The blue bars on the left side represent total collisions, and the brown bars on the right side represents KSI collisions only.
As shown in Figure 2.4, automobile right-of-way (19.1 percent), driving under the influence (16.7 percent), and improper turning (14.7 percent) were the top three causes of all collisions. For KSI collisions, the top three known causes were pedestrian violation and driving under the influence (both 16.3 percent), followed by automobile right-of-way (14.8 percent)
Note: The pedestrian right-of-way primary collision factor is a collision where a motorist did not yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing a roadway within a marked or unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, resulting in a collision. 32 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0 9.8%
4.2%
8.8%
11.5%
16.7%
19.7%
16.6%
12.8%
14 13 12 13 15 23 28 17
All KSI
12AM - 3AM3 AM - 6AM 6AM - 9AM 9AM - 12PM 12PM - 3PM 3PM - 6PM 6PM - 9PM 9PM - 12AM Figure 2.5 Collisions by Time of Day
WHEN DO MOST COLLISIONS OCCUR? Figure 2.5 summarizes the time of day a collision occurred in the past five years. Most of the collisions occurred in the afternoon, with 19.7 percent
associated between
3 PM and 6 PM, followed by
16.7 percent of the collisions between 12 PM and
3 PM. KSI-related collisions occurred most often
between the hours of
6 AM and 9 AM.
33 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
RANK Intersection Fatal Severe
Injury
Other
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only
Total
1 Harbor Boulevard & Orangethorpe Avenue 2 1 13 29 52 97 2 Magnolia Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue 10 31 31 72
3 Euclid Street & Orangethorpe Avenue 1 2 7 25 30 65
4 Orangethorpe Avenue & State College Boulevard 1 13 27 24 65 5 Commonwealth Avenue & Raymond Avenue 16 23 20 59
6 Highland Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue 3 18 16 18 55
7 Brookhurst Road & Orangethorpe Avenue 1 9 20 23 53
8 Harbor Boulevard & Orangefair Avenue 1 7 22 22 52
9 Chapman Avenue & Harbor Boulevard 2 11 24 15 52
10 Commonwealth Avenue & Harbor Boulevard 10 18 24 52
WHERE DO MOST COLLISIONS OCCUR?
Table 2.1 summarizes the top 10 intersections in Fullerton with the highest number of reported collisions. Table 2.2 summarizes the top 10 corridors in Fullerton with the highest number of reported collisions. Figure 2.8 maps the locations of collisions resulting in fatalities or severe injuries (KSI), along with non-KSI collisions. Figure 2.9 illustrates collision hot spots across the City, as identified through ArcGIS Hot Spot Analysis. This analysis uses statistically significant spatial clustering to detect areas with a high concentration of collisions.
Table 2.1 Top 10 Collision Intersections
34 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
RANK Corridor Fatal Severe
Injury
Other
Visible
Injury
Complaint
of Pain
Property
Damage
Only
Total
1 Harbor Boulevard 8 11 111 223 257 610
2 Orangethorpe Avenue 10 25 99 191 208 533
3 Commonwealth Avenue 3 2 97 145 202 449
4 Euclid Street 2 3 56 128 104 293
5 Chapman Avenue 4 6 68 103 101 282
6 State College Boulevard 2 6 62 100 92 262
7 Gilbert Street 2 4 38 58 77 179
8 Bastanchury Road 3 4 46 66 57 176
9 Lemon Street 1 33 90 52 176
10 Yorba Linda Boulevard 1 44 51 57 153
Table 2.2 Top 10 Collision Corridors
35 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 2.8 KSI & Non-KSI Collisions
36 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 2.9 Hot Spot Locations
37 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CH 3.
ENGAGEMENT AND
COLLABORATION
38 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Community & Public Engagement
Engaging with the Fullerton community across multiple channels was crucial in developing the Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan. This stage of the planning process allowed residents and stakeholders to provide their unique insights into making Fullerton a safer place for roadway users. Both in-person public events and surveys (paper and electronic) were employed to help the project team understand community sentiment on roadway safety in Fullerton.
The Project Team partnered with City of Fullerton staff to release survey flyers electronically through the City’s Facebook and Instagram profiles, as well as mail physical copies of the survey to multiple residences. Additionally, community insight was gained through a series of in-person meetings and events where community members could directly provide their feedback on the Plan.
A stakeholder list encompassing representatives from the City Public Works Department and the community (Fullerton School District, City of Fullerton Active Transportation Committee, California State University, Fullerton, etc.) was also compiled to create an Advisory Group representing diverse backgrounds and knowledge bases. This group provided expert insight while developing the Plan and convened four times. Fullerton residents were invited to attend a separate series of three Community Input Meetings to offer their concerns and suggestions relating to transportation-related issues. Finally, the Project Team engaged with the general public at three community events by distributing informational materials and answering questions.
This section summarizes the community engagement process that occurred during the development of the City of Fullerton Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan.
39 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Advisory Group Meetings
As a part of the public outreach and engagement process, a stakeholder list encompassing representatives from the City Public Works Department and the community was compiled. These stakeholders formed an Advisory Group representing diverse backgrounds and knowledge bases. This group met virtually three times and provided expert insight to members of the Project Team during the planning process.
Advisory Group Meeting #1
AUGUST 7, 2024
The first Advisory Group Meeting brought together
representatives from a variety of local organizations,
including the Fullerton School District, the City of Fullerton Active Transportation Committee, and California State
University, Fullerton (CSUF). The meeting covered existing road safety and active transportation conditions in Fullerton while also giving an overview of the Plan and upcoming
community engagement strategies. During the discussion portion of the meeting, stakeholders mentioned certain
major arterial roads as being unsafe for K-12 and college students to walk and bike due to high vehicle traffic, lack of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and poor road conditions (i.e. potholes). Information on existing efforts by local groups to improve active transportation conditions in Fullerton was shared, as well as the next steps for upcoming meetings.
Advisory Group Meeting #2
DECEMBER 5, 2024
The second Advisory Group Meeting provided updates
on the Project timeline, as well as preliminary feedback received from surveys and Community Input Meetings.
A summary of the criteria used to identify areas and
strategies for improvement was also provided. Members
of the group discussed (among other items) the need to
address challenges related to e-scooters, the potential for a pedestrian bridge near CSUF, and the opportunity to provide traffic safety education along with enforcement to reduce collisions across all modes of transportation.
40 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Advisory Group Meeting #3
SEPTEMBER 4, 2025
The third Advisory Group Meeting provided
key data points from completed outreach
events, including from the surveys and the
Community Input Meetings. The group
also discussed priority neighborhoods,
intersections, and corridors, along with
their selection criteria. Finally, the project
staff presented draft recommendations
at locations along Bastanchbury Road to
provide examples of recommendations
being proposed in the SS4A Action Plan.
41 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Community Input Meetings
Fullerton residents were invited to attend a separate series of three Community Input Meetings to offer their concerns and suggestions relating to transportation-related issues. These meetings took place at different in-person locations in areas with high vehicle traffic, a perceived need for safety and inadequate biking and walking facilities improvements. At each meeting, project team members and City staff met with residents of the surrounding community at the school to give a presentation about the project, explaining its goals and existing conditions. After the presentation, a mapping activity and discussion session were conducted to gather community feedback on traffic concerns in the area.
Community Input Meeting #1
OCTOBER 3, 2024
The first Community Input Meeting took place at
Orangethorpe Elementary School, located near
one of the most collision-prone intersections
in the City of Fullerton. Project team members
and City staff met with nine residents of the
surrounding community, most of which were
families who lived adjacent to the school.
Attendees highlighted issues such as poor
sidewalk and lighting conditions on neighborhood
streets, inadequate signal timing at the
intersection of Brookhurst Road and Page Avenue,
speeding along Brookhurst Road, Orangethorpe
Avenue, and Page Avenue, and minimal crossing
opportunities along Orangethorpe Avenue and
Brookhurst Road.
42 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Community Input Meeting #2
NOVEMBER 13, 2024
The second Community Input Meeting took place
at Commonwealth Elementary School, another
school located next to a vehicle and collision-
heavy corridor. Nine attendees (comprised of
a combination of residents, school parents,
and members of advocacy organizations) also
attended this meeting. Specific concerns that
were raised included hazardous conditions for
cyclists along Commonwealth Avenue and Lemon
Street, speeding issues along Harbor Boulevard in
the Downtown Fullerton area, and poor sidewalk
and lighting conditions on local streets. The most
common roadway safety concerns among those
who attended were roadway speeds and bicycle
safety.
43 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Community Input Meeting #3
DECEMBER 16, 2025
The third Community Input Meeting took place
via Zoom to provide stakeholders with project
updates, outreach status, selection critieria for
countermeasures, and proposed treatments in the
Fullerton SS4A Action Plan.
44 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Community Events
The project team engaged with the general public at three community events by distributing informational materials and answering questions. As with the Community Input Meetings, each event involved the use of community input boards and paper surveys to gather feedback and concerns from local residents.
Downtown Fullerton Farmer's Market
AUGUST 22, 2024
The Downtown Fullerton Farmer's Market, a
seasonal open-air weekly event, brought together
local vendors and more than one hundred
community members in a fun and festive
atmosphere. Thirty attendees completed a survey.
Most attendees highlighted issues such as
poor sidewalk and road conditions, speeding
along major corridors like Chapman Avenue and
Gilbert Street, and inadequate infrastructure for
pedestrians and cyclists. Participants included
both residents and non-residents, with many of the
resident families arriving at the event location by
car or on foot.
45 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Fullerton Police Department
Trunk-or-Treat event
OCTOBER 25, 2024
The City of Fullerton Trunk-or-Treat event, hosted
by the Fullerton Police Department, was an
annual Halloween-themed event bringing together
over one hundred families, City staff, and other
members of the community. Twenty attendees
completed surveys.
Many residents at this event pointed out
multiple safety-related issues on major streets
throughout the City. These specific concerns
included speeding issues along Orangethorpe
and Commonwealth Avenues, as well as potholes
and uneven sidewalks along Euclid Street and
Chapman Avenue.
46 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Downtown Fullerton Farmer's Market
SEPTEMBER 25, 2025
Project staff once again attended the Downtown
Fullerton Farmer's Market. This time to gather
feedback on proposed project recommendations
and answer questions. There were over 100
attendees to the event, 30 of which stopped and
engaged with project materials and staff. Ten
stakeholders signed up for additional information.
Most attendees expressed support for the
proposed treatments, especially those improving
the pedestrian experience such as Leading
Pedestrian Intervals (LPI), curb extensions,
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), and
high visbility crosswalks. Participants were in
favor of bicycle improvements such as bike lanes
and turn boxes. Many noted that the proposed
treatments would improve their experience at
intersections that they frequent.
Some attendees expressed concerns about
roadway changes such as lane reconfiguration
and curb extensions citing an increase in
congestion and construction cost.
Attendees were grateful for the City's outreach
efforts and to see investment in Fullerton
47 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Survey Results
To better understand citywide safety concerns, a survey was conducted between September and December 2024. It received 242 responses through both hard copy submissions at community outreach events and an online format. The following results summarize the feedback collected during this period.
SURVEY #1
ENGLISH SPANISH KOREAN
Link to Online Survey #1:
CIUDAD DE FULLERTON
Safe Streets And Roads For All Action Plan
Q7. ¿Cuáles son las áreas de peligro en relación con la seguridad peatonal en Fullerton? Estas áreas de preocupación podrían incluir lugares donde ha observado colisiones de peatones y ci- clistas con vehículos, diseños o condiciones inseguras de las calles y/o falta de comodidades como aceras o carriles bici. Escriba los lugares y sus razones para seleccionarlos. Sea lo más específico posible.Lugar de Dificultad Razón
Q8. ¿Qué otros comentarios o recomendaciones le gustaría compartir en relación con la seguridad vial en su comunidad?
Gracias por dedicarnos su tiempo.
Suscríbase a nuestra lista de correo para recibir las últimas noticias sobre el proyecto.
Nombre
Correo electrónico
2 de 2
CITY OF FULLERTON
SAFE STREET AND ROADS FOR ALL
Q7. Where are your areas of concern relating to street safety in Fullerton? These areas of concern could include places where you’ve witnessed pedestrian and bike crashes with cars, unsafe street designs or conditions, and/or a lack of amenities such as sidewalks or bike lanes. Please write the locations and your reasons for selecting them. Please be as specific as you can.
Location of Concern Safety Issue
Q8. What additional comments or suggestions do you have regarding street and road safety in your community? (Open-ended response)
Thank you for taking time to give your feedback!
Please join our mailing list to get the latest project updates! Name
Email Address
2 of 2
CITY OF FULLERTON
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
Community Survey
We are committed to making our streets and roads safer for everyone. To help us develop an effective Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Plan, we need your input. This survey aims to gather your experiences, concerns, and suggestions regarding road safety in your community. The survey should take no more than 5 minutes to complete.
1 of 2
Q1. How would you rate overall traffic safety of the
streets and roads in your area?
Very safe
Somewhat safe
Neutral
Somewhat unsafe
Very unsafe
Q2. What are the most common safety concerns you
have about local streets and roads? (Select all that
apply)
Speeding vehicles
Poor road conditions (e.g., potholes, cracks)
Lack of pedestrian crossings
Insufficient street lighting
Bicycle safety
Traffic congestion
Inadequate signage
Other
(please specify)
Q3. How would you rate the overall condition of
roads and sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Q4. Which safety improvements would you like to
see in your community? (Select all that apply)
Improved traffic signal timing
Improved pedestrian crossings
Road repairs and maintenance
More traffic calming measures
(e.g., speed
bumps)
More enforcement
Enhanced public transportation options
Other
(please specify)
Q5. How frequently do you use alternative transpor-
tation methods (e.g., biking, walking, public transit)
in your daily routine?
Daily
Several times a week
Occasionally
Rarely
Never
Q6. How effective do you think the current measures
are for protecting pedestrians and cyclists in your
area?
Very effective
Somewhat effective
Neutral
Somewhat ineffective
Very ineffective
Next Page
CIUDAD DE FULLERTON
Safe Streets And Roads For All Action Plan
Encuesta comunitaria
Estamos comprometidos a hacer que nuestras calles y carreteras sean más seguras para todos.
Necesitamos su opinión para ayudarnos a desarrollar un “Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan” con el fin de mejorar la seguridad de peatones y ciclistas en Fullerton. Esta encuesta busca recoger sus experiencias, preocupaciones y recomendaciones sobre la seguridad de las vías públicas en su comunidad. La encuesta no le llevará más de 5 minutos.
1 de 2
Q1. ¿Cómo evaluaría la seguridad general del tráfico
en las calles y carreteras de su vecindario?
Muy seguro
Algo seguro
Neutro
Algo inseguro
Muy inseguro
Q2. ¿Cuáles son los problemas de seguridad que más
le preocupan en las calles y carreteras locales?
(Seleccione todo lo que se aplique)
Vehículos con exceso de velocidad
Mal estado de la carretera (baches, grietas, etc)
Falta de cruces peatonales
Iluminación insuficiente de las calles
Seguridad en bicicleta
Congestión del tráfico
Insuficiente letreros de dirección
Otros (por favor, especifique)
Q3. ¿Cómo evaluaría el estado general de las
carreteras y aceras de su vecindario?
Excelente
Bien
Aceptable
Mal
Muy deficiente
Q4. ¿Qué mejoras de seguridad le gustaría ver en su
comunidad? (Seleccione todo lo que se aplique)
Mejoras en la sincronización de los semáforos
Mejoras en los cruces peatonales
Reparación y mantenimiento de las carreteras
Más mejoras para calmar el tráfico
(p. ej., tope de velocidad)
Más cumplimiento de las leyes de tráfico
Mejores opciones de transporte público
Otros ( por favor especifique)
Q5. ¿Con qué frecuencia utiliza medios de transporte
alternativos (p. ej., bicicleta, a pie, transporte público) en su rutina diaria?
A diario
Varias veces por semana
De vez en cuando
En raras ocasiones
Nunca
Q6. ¿Qué grado de protección cree que ofrecen las
infraestructuras actuales a los peatones y ciclistas de su vecindario?
Muy eficaz
Algo eficaz
Neutro
Algo ineficaz
Muy ineficaz
Página Siguiente
CITY OF FULLERTON
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리 실행 계획
Q7. 플러튼에서 거리 안전과 관련하여 우려되는 지역은 어디인가요?
우려되는 지역에는 교통사고가 잦은 곳, 보행자나 자전거가 차량과 충돌한 곳, 안전하지 않은 도로 설계나 상 태, 보도나 자전거 도로와 같은 시설 부족 등이 포함될 수 있습니다. 해당 위치와 선택한 이유를 구체적으로 작성해 주세요. 가능한 한 자세히 기재해 주시기 바랍니다.우려되는 곳 안전 이슈
Q8. 귀하의 지역 사회에서 도로와 거리 안전에 대해 추가로 의견이나 제안하실 사항이 있나요? (주관식 답변) 피드백을 제공해 주셔서 감사합니다!
최신 프로젝트 업데이트를 받으시려면 저희 메일링 리스트에 가입해 주세요!
이름
이메일
2 of 2
CITY OF FULLERTON
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리 실행 계획
커뮤니티 설문 조사
우리는 모든 사람에게 더 안전한 도로와 거리를 만들기 위하여 노력하고 있습니다. 모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리(SS4A) 실행 계획을 효과적으로 수립하기 위해서는 여러분의 의견이 필요합니다. 이 설문 조사는 여러분의 경험, 우려 사항, 그리고 지역 사회의 도로 안전에 대한 제안을 수집하기 위한 것입니다. 설문 조사는 5분 이내에 완료하실 수 있습니다.
1 of 2
Q1. 귀하의 지역 도로와 거리에 대한 전반적인 교통 안전
수준을 어떻게 평가하시겠습니까?
매우 안전함
다소 안전함
보통
다소 위험함
매우 위험함
Q2. 지역 도로와 거리에 대해 가장 우려되는 안전 문제는
무엇인가요? (해당되는 모든 항목을 선택해 주세요)
속도 위반 차량
도로 상태 불량 (예: 움푹 패인 곳, 균열)
보행자 횡단보도 부족
불충분한 가로등
자전거 안전
교통 혼잡
불충분한 표지판
기타 (구체적으로 기재해 주세요)
Q3. 귀하의 동네 도로와 인도(보도)의 전반적인 상태를
어떻게 평가하시겠습니까?
아주 우수함
좋음
보통
나쁨
아주 나쁨
Q4. 귀하의 지역 사회에는 어떤 안전 개선 사항들이 필요
한가요? (해당되는 모든 항목을 선택해 주세요)
교통 신호 주기/타이밍 개선
보행자 횡단보도 개선
도로 수리 및 유지 관리
속도 완화 조치 추가 (예: 과속 방지턱)
교통 단속 강화
대중교통 옵션 개선
기타 (구체적으로 기재해 주세요)
Q5. 일상에서 대체 교통 수단 (예: 자전거, 도보, 대중교
통)을 얼마나 자주 이용하시나요?
매일
주 3~4회
주 1~2회
가끔
거의 이용하지 않음
Q6. 귀하의 지역에서 보행자와 자전거 이용자를 보호하
기 위한 현재의 조치가 얼마나 효과적이라고 생각하시나
요?
매우 효과적임
다소 효과적임
보통
다소 비효과적임
매우 비효과적임
다음 페이지
48 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Somewhat
Unsafe, 30%
Somewhat
Safe, 29%
Very Unsafe,
20%
Neutral, 10%
Very Safe, 5%
Poor Road
Conditions (e.g.,
potholes, cracks)
173
Speeding
Vehicles
161
Bicycle Safety
114
Insufficient
Street Lighting
88 Lack of
Pedestrian
Crossing
83 Traffic
Congestion
53 Inadequate
Signage
33 Other 23
Figure 3.1 Traffic Safety Rating Figure 3.2 Common Roadway Safety Issues When asked their opinion on the overall traffic safety of streets and roads in Fullerton, most respondents (30 percent) mentioned feeling somewhat unsafe. This reveals a desire on the community’s part for noticeable improvements in roadway safety. Figure 3.1 illustrates how respondents rated traffic safety.
Figure 3.2 demonstrates the most commonly identified roadway safety issues found in the survey response data. The most common safety concerns brought up by residents were poor road conditions (173) and high vehicle speeds (161), both of which reflect concerns raised in the Community Input Meetings and Events.
Traffic Safety Rating & Common Roadway Safety Issue
49 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Road repairs and
maintenance, 25%
Improved
pedestrian
crossing, 17%Enhanced public
transportation options,
14%
More
enforcement,
12%
Improved
traffic signal
timing, 12%
Other, 6%
More traffic
calming
measures, 14%
Figure 3.3 Preferred Roadway Safety Improvements
Preferred Roadway Safety Improvements
When asked about their preferred methods
of roadway safety improvement, similar
results emerge. As shown in Figure 3.3,
most respondents selected road repairs
and maintenance as their most preferred
improvement (25 percent), followed by
improved pedestrian crossings (17 percent).
Improving and maintaining roadways
can reduce accidents by eliminating the
possibility of vehicles and bicycles crashing
as a result of poor conditions (i.e. potholes),
while installing crosswalks can improve
pedestrian safety by providing a safe space
within an intersection or roadway that is
separate from vehicular traffic.
50 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Daily Several Time
a Week
Occasionally Rarely Never
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Figure 3.4 Traffic Safety Rating
How Often Do People Walk, Bike, or Take Transit?
A majority of survey respondents reported either walking, biking or using public transportation daily (25 percent) or several times a week (21 percent). These findings, displayed in Figure 3.4, also reveal that a small minority of respondents reported never using these transportation modes (12 percent).
Because such a large number of community members regularly use alternative modes of transportation, it is crucial that roadway conditions are improved so that all users can feel comfortable and safe when traveling in Fullerton.
51 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
After the project team developed preliminary recommendations, an online survey was conducted between December and January 2025.
It prompted respondents to provide their feelings about specific treatment types and location. The survey received 15 responses. The following results summarize the feedback from this survey.
SURVEY #2
Yes, 80%
Somewhat
Safe, 29%
Figure 3.5 Are These Key Treatments Positive Additions? Figure 3.6 I think These Key Treatments are Positive Additions.
When asked about key treatments proposed at multiple
locations on Fullerton roadways, respondents were
overwhelmingly in support.
Figure 3.5 illustrates whether respondents think key treatments are positive additions to signalized intersections.
Figure 3.6 shows whether respondents agree that key
treatments are positive additions to Fullerton roadways.
General Treatments
No, 13%
Blank, 7%
Blank, 7%
Yes, 93%
High-Visibility Crosswalks
Leading Pedestrian Intervals
Retroreflective Backplates
ADA Curb Ramps
Strongly Agree
Strongly AgreeStrongly Disagree
Strongly Disagree
52 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 3.7 I would like to see speed feedback signage on Bastanchury Road between Brea Boulevard and the East City Limit.
Figure 3.8 I would like to see bike turn boxes at the intersection of Bastanchury Road and Brea Boulevard.
Figure 3.9 I would like to see a lane reconfiguration on Commonwealth Avenue between Library Lane and Balcom Avenue.
Figure 3.10 I would like to see a curb extension at the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and Lillie Avenue.
Treatments by Location
The survey included questions about key treatments at specific locations, that were selected as representative of the types of treatments proposed in the SS4A Action Plan.
Respondents were typically supportive of the treatments recommended. Figures 3.7 - 3.14 show the survey responses to location-specific treatments.
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
53 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 3.11 I would like to see a curb extension at the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and Yale Avenue.
Figure 3.12 I would like to see a hardened centerline at the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and Acacia Avenue.
Figure 3.13 I would like to see a rectangular rapid flashing beacon at the intersection of Richman Avenue and Elm Avenue.
Figure 3.14 I would like to see a stop sign and marking at the intersection of Ash Avenue and Jensen Way.
Figure 3.15 I think a scramble
crosswalk is a positive addition to
the intersection of State College
Boulevard and Dorothy Lane.
Figure 3.16 I think a hardened
centerline is a positive addition to
the intersection of State College
Boulevard and Dorothy Lane.
Figure 3.17 I think a gateway curb
extension is a positive addition to
the intersection of Citrus Avenue
and Hill Avenue.
Figure 3.18 I think a rectangular
rapid flashing beacon is a positive
addition to the intersection of Citrus
Avenue and Hill Avenue.
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Strongly
Disagree
Strongly
Agree
Yes, 53%
No, 47%
Yes, 73%
No, 27%
Yes, 60%
No, 40%
Yes, 87%
No, 13%
54 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CH 4.
OPPORTUNITY
ANAL YSIS
55 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Opportunity Analysis
The opportunity analysis is based on a comprehensive set of criteria that assess socioeconomic, health, transportation, and environmental factors affecting Fullerton communities. These criteria were selected to identify priority areas and corridors that may experience disparities in mobility, safety, and access to essential services.
Each criterion is evaluated using established thresholds, primarily set at the 50th percentile for relevant indicators, ensuring that areas with higher-than-median burdens or challenges are highlighted. The data sources include:
• CalEnviroScreen 4.0: A tool provided by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
that uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic
information to identify communities that are most affected by pollution and the location of vulnerable populations. • The American Community Survey : A annual
demographics survey conducted by the US Census Bureau,
collecting population data.
• The California Department of Education : The agency
within the government of California that oversees
education funding, testing, and resources.
• Crossroads Traffic Records System: A software for
reporting and analytics of traffic collisions, used by police departments and public agencies.
Socioeconomic and Health Indicators:
• Poverty (50th percentile)
• Cardiovascular Disease (50th percentile)
• Unemployment (50th percentile)
• Housing Burden (50th percentile)
• Free and Reduced Meals (80% of students)
Transportation Access and Barriers:
• Transportation Barriers (50th percentile)
• Vehicle Access (50th percentile)
• Traffic Volume (50th percentile)
• Collisions (Total number of incidents)
Community Access:
• School Distance (¼ mile threshold)
• Library Distance (¼ mile threshold)
56 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Pollution Burden
Exposures
• Ozone Concentrations
• PM2.5 Concentrations
• Diesel PM Emissions
• Drinking Water Contaminants
• Children's Lead Risk from
Housing
• Pesticide Use
• Toxic Releases from Facilities
• Traffic Impacts
Enviromental Effects
• Cleanup Sites
• Groundwater Threats
• Hazardous Waste
• Impaired Water Bodies
• Solid Waste Sites and Facilities
• Drinking Water Contaminants
• Children's Lead Risk from
Housing
• Pesticide Use
• Toxic Releases from Facilities
• Traffic Impacts
Population Characteristics
Sensitive Popolations
• Asthma Emergency Department
Visits
• Cardiovascular Disease
(Emergency Department Visits
for Heart Attacks)
• Low Birth-Weight Infants
Socioeconomic Factors
• Educational Attainment
• Housing-Burdened Low-Income
Households
• Linguistic Isolation
• Poverty
• Unemployment
American Community Survey
The American Community Survey
(ACS), conducted by the U.S. Census
Bureau, provides detailed demographic,
social, economic, and housing
data on an annual basis. Five-year
estimates from the most recent
ACS dataset were used to analyze
sociodemographic characteristics
within the study area.
Crossroads Traffic Records
System
The Traffic Collision Database provides
data input and management for
collisions, citations, and DUIs; queries
and reports, including historical, high
incidence, and monthly, as well as
collision reports by day and hour and
other parameters. The most recent five
years of collision data from June 1,
2019 to May 31, 2024 were extracted
to identify long–term collision trends
and patterns within the City.
CalEnviroScreen 4.0
The CalEnviroScreen aggregates data from 21 indicators to characterize both pollution burden and population characteristics and calculates the CalEnviroScreen score for an individual census tract. The final score is used to identify communities experiencing greater environmental health burdens and/or facing more environmental health risks compared to other communities in California.
57 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
RANK Intersection Total Score
1 Highland Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue 124.51
2 Harbor Boulevard & Orangethorpe Avenue 123.18
3 Orangethorpe Avenue & Richman Avenue 114.06
4 Euclid Street & Orangethorpe Avenue 108.66
5 Harbor Boulevard & Valencia Drive 105.49
6 Harbor Boulevard & Southgate Avenue 102.57
7 Gilbert Street & Orangethorpe Avenue 102.40
8 Acacia Avenue & Commonwealth Avenue 100.68
9 Harbor Boulevard & Orangefair Avenue 98.80
10 Magnolia Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue 98.16
RANK Corridor Total Score
1 Orangethorpe Avenue 214.33
2 Commonwealth Avenue 168.27
3 Placentia Avenue 160.48
4 Harbor Boulevard 158.53
5 Malvern Avenue - Chapman Avenue 157.09
6 State College Boulevard 138.88
7 Euclid Street 137.07
8 Brea Boulevard 122.69
9 Bastanchury Road 117.42
10 State College Boulevard 94.06
Table 4.1. Top Opportunity Intersections & Scores
Table 4.2. Top Opportunity Corridors & Scores
To help identify areas of greatest need, a grid of
approximately 9,500 hexagonal cells was overlaid
on the project area, establishing a spatial framework
for the analysis. Each hexagon was assigned
values based on the characteristics of the land it
encompasses. Eleven criteria, as previously listed,
were taken into account. For example, each hexagon
received a Poverty percentile value derived from the
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 score corresponding to the area
it covers.
Each intersection is analyzed using a 250-foot buffer.
The calculations are derived from the hexagons that
fall within this buffer. If the buffer overlaps two or
more hexagons, the final score is a weighted sum of
the scores from all overlapping hexagons. The weight
is based on the proportion of each hexagon's area
that lies within the buffer.
Similarly, each project corridor is analyzed using a
100-foot buffer, with calculations based on the values
from the hexagons within that buffer area.
Tables 4.1 and 4.2 list the top opportunity
intersections and corridors, along with their total
scores. Figures 4.1 and 4.2 illustrate these top
opportunity intersections and corridors, respectively.
Figure 4.3 presents the five highest-ranking
opportunity neighborhoods.
TOP OPPORTUNITY INTERSECTIONS &
CORRIDORS
58 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 4.1 Top Opportunity Intersections
59 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 4.2 Priority Corridors
60 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
RANK Neighborhood Bounds Average Score
1 Southwest Area N: Commonwealth Avenue, E: Gilbert Street, S: Orangethorpe Avenue, W: Magnolia Avenue 30.06
2 Harbor West Area N: Ash Avenue, E: Harbor Boulevard,
S: City Limit, W: Richman Avenue 28.71
3 Euclid West Area N: Ash Avenue, E: Euclid Street,
S: City Limit, W: Basque Avenue 25.93
4 California State University, Fullerton Area N: Yorba Linda Boulevard, E: Placentia Avenue, S: Chapman Avenue, W: State College Boulevard 24.73
5 Orangethorpe Avenue and Adjacent Area N: Orangethorpe Avenue, E: Basque Avenue, S: City Limit, W: Magnolia Avenue 23.22
Table 4.3. Top Opportunity Neighborhoods
In addition to identifying top opportunity corridors, top neighborhoods were also selected based on areas with a high concentration of medium to high opportunity hexagons. Neighborhood groupings were also outlined to include roadways with similar character or treatment types needed.
The top opportunity neighborhoods helped inform focus areas for treatment type. Top opportunity neighborhoods, as well as corridors, were referenced again when developing the implementation prioritization.
Table 4.3 lists the top opportunity neighborhoods, along with their bounds and average scores. Average scores were used to account for variation in neighborhood size and, thus, number of hexagons. Figure 4.3 presents the five highest-ranking opportunity neighborhoods.
TOP OPPORTUNITY NEIGHBORHOODS
61 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 4.3 Top Opportunity Neighborhoods
62 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CH 5.
COUNTERMEASURES
TOOLBOX
63 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN RUMBLE STRIPS
RAISED MEDIAN LANE RECONFIGURATION
A speed feedback sign displays a
driver's current speed and reminds
them of the posted speed limit,
encouraging them to check and
adjust their speed if necessary.
Rumble strips are placed
perpendicular to the travel lane
to alert drivers of the need to
slow down, stop, or prepare for
upcoming changes. They create
noise and vibration inside the
vehicle, helping inattentive,
distracted, or drowsy drivers stay
within their lane. Rumble strips
also enhance lane awareness in
low-visibility conditions.
LRSM ID NS12
CRF 20%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A raised median is a curbed
section that typically occupies the
center of a roadway and provides
opportunity for landscaping and
street trees. They can reduce
conflicts between opposing traffic
and help calm traffic speeds.
LRSM ID SI11, NS16, NS21PB, R08
CRF 25-45%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A lane reconfiguration can
improve safety, calm traffic, and
provide better mobility and access
for all road users. Typically, they
involve converting an existing
four-lane undivided roadway to a
three-lane roadway consisting of
two through lanes and a center
two-way left-turn lane.
LRSM ID R14
CRF 35%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
ROADWAYS & INTERSECTIONS
Countermeasures Toolbox
The project team collaborated with the City of Fullerton Public Works Department to develop the countermeasures toolbox.
Countermeasures were selected if the Public Works Department affirmed their efficacy in past projects and feasibility of implementation within the context of Fullerton. Countermeasures selected are industry-standard treatments, supported by Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) and other publications with demonstrated success in addressing collisions. The toolbox includes the LRSM IDs, crash reduction factors (CRF), and funding eligibility where relevant for the included countermeasures.
Not yet included in the LRSM;
CRF in development.
64 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
CIRCLE
Neighborhood traffic circles are
circular intersections similar
to roundabouts, but are stop
controlled on the approach and
intended for smaller intersections.
Typically, they supplement existing
stop-controlled intersections with
a circular island in the center that
is designed to slow traffic and
eliminates severe conflict points
(such as conflicting left-turn
movements).
LRSM ID NS06RA, NS07RA
CRF Var ies
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
HARDENED CENTERLINE
A hardened centerline is a small
rubber barrier next to a crosswalk
that requires people driving to
make slower, more square left-
hand turns. They can slow down
vehicle speeds significantly at
crosswalks and improve safety for
people in the crosswalk.
LRSM ID R28
CRF 25%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
STREET LIGHTING
Installing intersection and
pedestrian-scale lighting improves
visibility for all road users,
particularly at night or in low-light
conditions, reducing the risk of
collisions. Roadway lighting also
enhances driver awareness and
visibility of other road users and
potential hazards.
LRSM ID NS01NT, R01NT
CRF 35-40%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
ROADWAYS & INTERSECTIONS (CONTINUED)
65 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
RETROREFLECTIVE
BACKPLATE
PROTECTED LEFT TURNS
PROHIBIT RIGHT-TURN-ON-
RED
SEPARATE RIGHT-TURN
PHASING
Retroreflective borders improve
traffic signal visibility for aging
and color-vision-impaired
drivers, helping them identify
the illuminated signal. They also
enhance intersection awareness
during power outages by making
dark signal heads and backplates
more visible.
LRSM ID SI02
CRF 15%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A protected left turn can be
implemented at signalized
intersections (with existing left
turns pockets) that currently
have a permissive left-turn or no
left-turn protection. Providing
protected left-turn phases for
signalized intersections removes
the need for the drivers to navigate
through gaps in oncoming/
opposing through vehicles.
LRSM ID SI05, SI06
CRF 30-55%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
Prohibiting right-turn-on-red
movements should be considered
at skewed intersections, or where
exclusive pedestrian “WALK”
phases, Leading Pedestrian
Intervals (LPIs), sight distance
issues, or high pedestrian volumes
are present. Can help prevent
crashes between vehicles turning
right on red from one street and
through vehicles on the cross
street, and crashes involving
pedestrians.
LRSM does not include turn
restrictions.
Provides a green arrow phase
for right-turning vehicles.
Avoids conflicts between right-
turning traffic and bicyclists
or pedestrians crossing the
intersection on their right.
LRSM does not include right-turn
phasing.
SIGNALS
66 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
EXTEND YELLOW AND ALL
RED TIME
Extending yellow and all red time
increases the time allotted for
the yellow and red lights during
a signal phase. Extending yellow
and all red time allows drivers
and bicyclists a few additional
seconds of time at the end of a
signal phase to cross through a
signalized intersection before
conflicting traffic movements
are permitted to enter the
intersection.
LRSM ID SI03
CRF 15%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 50%
SPEED SENSITIVE REST IN
RED SIGNAL
During certain hours (e.g., late
night), a traffic signal may remain
red for all or specific approaches
until a vehicle arrives. If the
vehicle exceeds the desired
speed, the signal stays red until
the vehicle stops. If the vehicle is
traveling at the desired speed, the
signal turns green before arrival.
This timing strategy encourages
compliance with the speed limit
and can be paired with variable
speed warning signs for added
effectiveness.
LRSM ID SI03
CRF 15%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 50%
SIGNALS (CONTINUED)
67 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
ADD SIDEWALK HIGH-VISIBILITY
CROSSWALK
SCRAMBLE CROSSWALK LEADING PEDESTRIAN
INTERVAL
Adding sidewalks creates a
continuous, dedicated space for
pedestrians, ensuring their safety
by separating them from traffic.
LRSM ID R35PB
CRF 80%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A high-visibility crosswalk has
a striped pattern with ladder
markings made of high-visibility
material, such as thermoplastic
tape, instead of paint. A high-
visibility crosswalk improves the
visibility of marked crosswalks
and provides motorists a cue
to slow down and yield to
pedestrians.
A form of pedestrian “WALK”
phase at a signalized intersection
in which all vehicular traffic
is required to stop, allowing
pedestrians to cross through
the intersection in any direction,
including diagonally.
LRSM ID SI20PB
CRF 40%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A leading pedestrian interval gives
pedestrians the opportunity to
enter an intersection 3 - 7 seconds
before vehicles are given a green
indication. With this head start,
pedestrians can better establish
their presence in the crosswalk
before vehicles have priority to
turn left or right. Pedestrian recall
is a traffic signal timing function
that causes a pedestrian walk
phase to activate automatically
every cycle.
LRSM ID SI22PB
CRF 60%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
LRSM does not include crosswalk
upgrades or new crosswalks at
unsignalized intersections.
68 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID
BEACON
RECTANGULAR RAPID
FLASHING BEACON
PEDESTRIAN REFUGE
ISLAND
CURB EXTENSIONS
A pedestrian-hybrid beacon
(PHB) is used at unsignalized
intersections or mid-block
crosswalks to notify oncoming
motorists to stop with a series
of red and yellow lights. Unlike
a traffic signal, the PHB rests in
dark until a pedestrian activates
it via pushbutton or other form of
detection.
LRSM ID NS25PB
CRF 55%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A rectangular rapid flashing
beacon (RRFB) is a pedestrian-
activated flashing light with
additional signage to alert
motorists of a pedestrian
crossing. An RRFB increases the
visibility of marked crosswalks
and provides motorists a cue
to slow down and yield to
pedestrians.
LRSM ID NS24PB
CRF 35%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A pedestrian refuge island is a
raised barrier in the center of
the roadway that can provide a
place for pedestrians to wait if
they are unable to finish crossing
the intersection and reduce the
exposure for pedestrians crossing
the intersection. Pedestrian refuge
areas constructed from paint
and plastic may be implemented
as part of a low-cost/quick build
project.
LRSM ID NS21PB
CRF 45%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A curb extension is a traffic
calming measure that widens the
sidewalk for a short distance to
enhance the pedestrian crossing.
This narrows the roadway, reduces
the crossing distance, and allows
pedestrians and drivers to see
each other more easily when
parked vehicles would otherwise
block visibility.
LRSM ID NS23PB, R36PB
CRF 35%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES (CONTINUED)
69 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
BIKE LANE BUFFERED BIKE LANE SEPARATED BIKEWAY BIKE BOX Bike lanes designate an exclusive
space for bicyclists using
pavement markings and signage.
The bike lane is located adjacent
to motor vehicle travel lanes and
flows in the same direction as
motor vehicle traffic. Bike lanes
are typically on the right side of
the street, between the adjacent
travel lane and curb, road edge, or
travel lane.
LRSM ID R33PB
CRF 35%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
Buffered Bike Lanes are
standard bike lanes paired with
a designated horizontal buffer
space, separating the bicycle lane
from the adjacent motor vehicle
travel lane and/or parking lane.
This type of bikeway provides
greater distance between vehicles
and bicycles; provides space for
bicyclists to pass each other;
and encourages bicycling by
contributing to the perception of
safety.
LRSM ID R33PB
CRF 35%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A separated bikeway, also called
a cycletrack, provides dedicated
street space, typically adjacent
to outer vehicle travel lanes, with
physical separation from vehicle
traffic, designated lane markings,
pavement legends, and signage.
Physical separation may consist
of plastic posts, parked vehicles,
raised median, or a curb (if the
separated bike lane is raised to
sidewalk level).
LRSM ID R34PB
CRF 45%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
A designated area between the
crosswalk and vehicle stop bar
at a signalized intersection that
is often painted green where
bicyclists can wait during a red
signal phase. The use of the bike
box places bicyclists in a location
where they are more visible to
motorists.
LRSM ID SI21PB
CRF 15%
HSIP Funding Eligibility 90%
BICYCLE FACILITIES
70 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
GREEN CONFLICT
STRIPING
BIKE CROSSING
Green conflict striping is green
pavement markings in a dashed
pattern that extend across
bike lanes approaching an
intersection and/or going through
an intersection. Green conflict
striping improves and increases
the visibility of bicyclists and
potential conflict points so
motorists and bicyclists can use
caution when traveling toward and
through an intersection.
Solid green paint across an
intersection signifies the path of
the bicycle crossing. Increases
visibility of bicyclists’ anticipated
path of travel through an
intersection.
BICYCLE FACILITIES (CONTINUED)
LRSM does not include conflict
striping.
LRSM does not include bike
crossing.
CH 6.
PRIORITY PROJECTS
72 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 6.1 Proposed Recommendations
The SS4A Action Plan proposes over 380 countermeasures on Fullerton roadways, developed to balance public concerns and engineering best practices. The project team considered collision trends and existing infrastructure, along with public feedback at specific locations to select appropriate countermeasures to address safety issues. Figure 6.1 displays all the proposed recommendations. The complete list of recommendations is found in Appendix B.
Infrastructure Recommendations
73 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
RANK Project Name Bounds
1 Southwest Area N: Commonwealth Avenue, E: Gilbert Street, S: Orangethorpe Avenue, W: Magnolia Avenue
2 Harbor West Area N: Ash Avenue, E: Harbor Boulevard,
S: City Limit, W: Richman Avenue
3 Euclid West Area N: Ash Avenue, E: Euclid Street,
S: City Limit, W: Basque Avenue
4 California State University, Fullerton Area N: Yorba Linda Boulevard, E: Placentia Avenue, S: Chapman Avenue, W: State College Boulevard
5 Orangethorpe Avenue and Adjacent Area N: Orangethorpe Avenue, E: Basque Avenue, S: City Limit, W: Magnolia Avenue
6 Commonwealth Avenue Corridor Brookhurst Avenue - State College Boulevard 7 Malvern - Chapman Corridor West City Limit - CA-57
8 Harbor Boulevard Corridor North City Limit - Brea Boulevard 9 Bastanchury - Brea Corridor Bastanchury Road (Harbor Boulevard - East City Limit) Brea Boulevard (Harbor Boulevard - Bastanchury Road)
10 Gilbert Avenue Corridor Rosecrans Avenue - Malvern Avenue Table 6.1. Project Names and Bounds
Project Development and Prioritization
Due to the large number of proposed countermeasures, the project team developed groupings to ease project identification and support grant pursuits. The opportunity analysis (Chapter 4) formed the basis of the groupings, which were further outlined based on areas that had shared needs and proposed countermeasure types. The proposed treatments were grouped into ten projects and ranked based on their opportunity scores. The projects are either area projects, grouped by neighborhood, or corridor projects, grouped by a specific roadway.
The project names, bounds, and priority rankings are shown in Table 6.1. Figure 6.2 shows the project names, location, and prioritization. 74 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Figure 6.2 Project Names and Prioritization
75 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Concept Plans
Given the extensive number of proposed treatments, the project team opted to show four key projects that are representative of the Action Plan's treatments in the concept plans below. The concept plans show the entirety of Orangethorpe Avenue and Adjacent Area project's proposed countermeasures. This project was selected as it includes the vast majority of treatment types included in the Action Plan.
To show key treatments that were not included in the Orangethorpe Avenue and Adjacent Area project, segments of two of the corridor projects are also included. The Brea Boulevard segment (between Harbor Boulevard and Bastanchury Road) of the Bastanchury - Brea Corridor project is shown below, as well as the segment of the Commonwealth Avenue Corridor project between Library Lane and Balcom Avenue.
Finally, one key intersection of the California State University, Fullerton Area project is included: the intersection of State College Boulevard and Dorothy Lane.
In conjunction, these concept plans (listed again below) show a representative sample of the treatments proposed in this Action Plan.
• Orangethope Avenue and Adjacent Area project
• Bastanchury - Brea Corridor project segment: Brea Boulevard (Harbor Boulevard to Bastanchury Road) • Commonwealth Avenue Corridor project segment: Library Lane to Balcom Avenue • California State University, Fullerton Area project intersection: State College Boulevard & Dorothy Lane Concept plans can be used for future spot improvements or corridor enhancement applications. The concept plans showcase typical improvements for enhanced pedestrian crossings, enhanced intersection movement, traffic operation strategies, and intersection strategies.
NOTE: Concept plans presented within
the SS4A should not be considered final.
These concepts are subject to additional
design and constructability review, as well
as community input.
76 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Curb Extension
Retroreflective Backplate
High-Visibility Crosswalk (Yellow)
Left Turn Signal
Hardened Centerline
Leading Pedestrian Interval
Stop Sign and Marking
Orangethorpe Avenue and Adjacent Area
NEIGHBORHOOD SNAPSHOT
Detectable Warning Surface
Gateway Curb Extension
Lighting
Median Island
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Edgeline Treatment
Sidewalk
Stop Here on Red Sign
Orangethorpe Avenue and Adjacent Area is the area east
of Magnolia Avenue and west of Basque Avenue and south
of Orangethorpe Avenue. The area is bordered by Northwest Anaheim to the south. The area is primarily residential, with commercial land use at Orangethorpe Avenue's intersections with Magnolia Avenue, Gilbert Street, and Brookhurst Road. The area also includes Gilbert Park and Orangethorpe School Park.
Orangethorpe Elementary School is in the neighborhood.
Corridors with recommended treatments are:
• Orangethorpe Avenue
• Woodcrest Avenue
• Gage Avenue
• Baker Avenue
• Roberta Avenue
• Maxim Avenue
• Houston Avenue
NEIGHBORHOOD FEATURE
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
Stop Here for Peds Sign
77 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Retroreflective Backplate
Leading Pedestrian Interval
A. Magnolia Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue B. Nicklett Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue C. Gilbert Street & Orangethorpe Avenue
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION
D. Brookhurst Road & Orangethorpe Avenue
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at all
four legs of the intersection
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads
to include retroreflective
backplates
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at all
four legs of the intersection
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads
to include retroreflective
backplates
• Install hardened centerlines on
the east and west legs
• Add a protected left-turn
signal for eastbound and
westbound traffic
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at all
four legs of the intersection
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads
to include retroreflective
backplates
• Install hardened centerlines on
the north and south legs
Retroreflective Backplate
Leading Pedestrian Interval
High-Visbility Crosswalk
Left Turn Signal
Hardened Centerline
Retroreflective Backplate
Leading Pedestrian Interval
Hardened Centerline
78 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
High-Visibility Crosswalk (Yellow)
Stop Here on Red Sign
Leading Pedestrian Interval
E. Pacific Drive & Orangethorpe Avenue F. Courtney Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (North Frontage Road) G. Cedar Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (North Frontage Road)
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
H. Pacific Drive & Orangethorpe Avenue (North Frontage Road) • Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings on the
east leg
• Update existing crosswalk to
be yellow on the east leg of
the intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the north leg of the
intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the north leg of the
intersection
• Install high-visibility yellow
crosswalks at the north and
west legs of the intersection
• Install a Stop Here on Red
sign at the north leg of the
intersection
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
High-Visibility Crosswalk (Yellow)
79 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Stop Here on Red Sign
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
I. Eadington Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (North Frontage Road) J. Basque Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (North Frontage Road) K. Courtney Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (South Frontage Road) L. Cedar Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (South Frontage Road) • Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the north leg of the
intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop Here on Red
sign at the north leg of the
intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the south leg of
the intersection
• Install gateway curb
extensions into Courtney
Avenue on the southwest and
southeast corners
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the south leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the south leg of the
intersection
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Gateway Curb Extension
High-Visibility Crosswalk High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
H. Pacific Drive & Orangethorpe Avenue (North Frontage Road)
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
80 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
M. Eadington Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (South Frontage Road) N. Basque Avenue & Orangethorpe Avenue (South Frontage Road) O. Courtney Avenue & Woodcrest Avenue P . Cedar Avenue & Woodcrest Avenue • Install high-visibility crosswalks
on the south and east legs of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the south leg of the
intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the east leg of the
intersection
• Install a Stop Here on Red
sign on the south leg of the
intersection
• Install high-visibility crosswalks
on the east and south legs
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the east leg
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northeast, southeast, and
southwest corners
• Install lighting on the
northeast corner
• Install Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon at crossing on
the south leg
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the west leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and
marking on the west leg of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northwest and southwest
corners of the intersection
High-Visibility CrosswalkHigh-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking Stop Here on Red Sign
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning
Lighting
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
81 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Q. Pacific Drive & Woodcrest Avenue R. Eadington Avenue & Woodcrest Avenue S. Courtney Avenue & Gage Avenue
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
T. Pacific Drive & Gage Avenue
• Install Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon at crossing
on the south leg of the
intersection
• Install curb extension on the
southwest and southeast
corners of the intersection into
Pacific Drive
• Install Stop signs and markings
at the east and west legs of the
intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the west leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and
marking at the west leg of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northwest and southwest
corners of the intersection
• Install Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon at crossing
on the north leg of the
intersection
• Install curb extensions on
the northwest and northeast
corners of the intersection into
Pacific Drive
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and MarkingCurb Extension
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Stop Sign and Marking
Curb Extension
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
P . Cedar Avenue & Woodcrest Avenue
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
82 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
U. Eadington Avenue & Gage Avenue V. Basque Avenue & Gage Avenue W. Courtney Avenue & Baker Avenue
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
X. Naples Place & Baker Avenue
• Install Stop signs and markings
at the east and west legs of the
intersection
• Install Stop signs and markings
at the east and west legs of the
intersection
• Install high-visibility crosswalks
on the west and east legs of
the intersection
• Install Stop signs and markings
on the east and west legs of
the intersection
• Install curb ramps on the
northwest and southwest
corners of the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
on the north leg of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northwest and northeast
corners of the intersection
Stop Sign and Marking
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
Lighting
Stop Sign and Marking
Stop Sign and Marking
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
83 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Y . Simi Place & Baker Avenue Z. Gilbert Street & Roberta Avenue AA. Pine Drive & Roberta Avenue BB. Maxzim Avenue & Roberta Avenue • Install a Stop sign and marking
on the north leg of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northwest and northeast
corners of the intersection
• Install curb extensions on
the northwest and northeast
corners of the intersection into
Gilbert Street
• Upgrade existing crosswalk
with "Stop Here for
Pedestrians" sign and yield
triangles for northbound and
southbound traffic
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northeast and southeast
corners
• Install high-visibility crosswalks
on the north and south legs of
the intersection
• Install Stop signs and markings
at the north and west legs of
the intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the southwest and southeast
corners of the intersection
• Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the south leg of
the intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the southwest and southeast
corners
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
Stop Sign and Marking Curb Extension
High-Visibility Crosswalk
X. Naples Place & Baker Avenue
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
Detectable Warning Surface
Stop Here for Peds Sign
Detectable Warning Surface
Detectable Warning Surface
Detectable Warning Surface
84 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CC. Courtney Avenue & Roberta Avenue DD. Brookhurst Road & Roberta Avenue EE. Houston Avenue & Roberta Avenue FF. Locust Drive & Roberta Avenue • Install a high-visibility
crosswalk on the north leg of
the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and marking
at the north leg of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northwest and northeast
corners of the intersection
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at all
four legs of the intersection
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads
to include retroreflective
backplates
• Install hardened centerlines on
the north and south legs
• Install gateway curb extensions
into Brookhurst Road on the all
corners of the intersection
• Install a high-visibility (yellow)
crosswalk on the south leg of
the intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces on the southwest
and southeast corners of the
intersection
• Install a high-visibility (yellow)
crosswalk on the south leg of
the intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces on the southwest
and southeast corners of the
intersection
High Visibility Crosswalk (Yellow)
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Stop Sign and Marking
Retroreflective Backplate
Hardened Centerline
Leading Pedestrian Interval
Gateway Curb Extension
High Visibility Crosswalk (Yellow)
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
Detectable Warning Surface Detectable Warning Surface
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
85 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
GG. Pacific Drive & Roberta Avenue HH. Basque Avenue & Roberta Avenue II. Courtney Avenue & Houston Avenue JJ. Eadington Avenue & Houston Avenue • Install a curb extension on
the northeast corner of the
intersection into Pacific Drive
and Roberta Avenue
• Install detectable warning
warning surfaces and curb
ramps on the northeast and
southeast corners of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces on the northwest
and southwest corners of the
intersection
• Install a Stop sign and
markings at the north leg of
the intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces and curb ramps on
the northwest and northeast
corners of the intersection
• Install a Stop sign and
markings at the north leg of
the intersection
Curb Extension Curb Ramp
Stop Sign and Marking Stop Sign and Marking
FF. Locust Drive & Roberta Avenue
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
Curb Ramp & Detectable Warning Surface
86 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
KK. Basque Avenue & Houston Avenue
• Install a Stop sign and marking
at the north leg of the
intersection
• Install detectable warning
surfaces on the northwest
and northeast corners of the
intersection
Stop Sign and Marking
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
Detectable Warning Surface
87 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
A. Page Avenue (Midblock - Brookhurst Road)
B. Page Avenue (Courtney Avenue - Brookhurst Road)
C. Multiple Locations
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY SEGMENT
• Install sidewalk that is currently missing on the north and south sides of the street, starting in front of 1940 and 1941 Roberta Avenue and continuing to the intersection with
Brookhurst Road
• Stripe edgelines on the north and south edges of the
street, from Courtney Avenue to Brookhurst Road
• Install midblock median island at the following locations:
» Baker Avenue (Pacific Drive to Eadington Avenue)
» Baker Avenue (Eadington Avenue - Basque Avenue)
» Roberta Avenue (Pacific Drive to Eadington Avenue)
» Roberta Avenue (Eadington Avenue - Basque Avenue)
» Houston Avenue (Pacific Drive to Eadington Avenue)
» Houston Avenue (Eadington Avenue - Basque Avenue)
Median Island
Edgeline Treatment
Sidewalk
88 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CORRIDOR SNAPSHOT
Retroreflective Backplate
High Visibility Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval
Upgrade to Protected Bike Lane
BREA BOULEVARD (HARBOR BOULEVARD TO BASTANCHURY ROAD)
Brea Boulevard between Harbor Boulevard and Bastanchury Road is in the northeastern portion of the City of Fullerton. The corridor has primarily residential land use, along with a significant number of parks including Hillcrest Park, Brea Dam Park, Fullerton Sports Complex, and Coyote Hills East Preserve. There are commercial land uses at Brea Boulevard's intersections with Harbor Boulevard and Bastanchury Road.
CORRIDOR FEATURE
Transverse Rumble Strip
Bike Box
Speed Feedback Signage
89 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Leading Pedestrian Interval
A. Harbor Boulevard & Brea Boulevard B. Lemon Street & Brea Bouevard C. Panorama Road & Brea Boulevard
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION
D. Ashburn Terrace & Brea Boulevard
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at all
four legs of the intersection
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads
to include retroreflective
backplates
• Install high-visibility crosswalks
on all four legs of the
intersection
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at the
north and south legs of the
intersection
• Install transverse rumble strips
on the southbound approach
to the intersection
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at the
east and west legs of the
intersection
• Install high-visibility crosswalks
on all three legs of the
intersection
• Install Leading Pedestrian
Intervals for crossings at the
east leg of the intersection
Retroreflective Backplate
Leading Pedestrian Interval
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval
Transverse Rumble Strip
High-Visibility Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval
90 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
E. Bastanchury Road & Brea Boulevard
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY INTERSECTION (CONTINUED)
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads
to include retroreflective
backplates
• Install two-stage turn bike
boxes for east- and westbound
bicyclists
Retroreflective Backplate
Two-Stage Bike Turn Box
A. Brea Boulevard (Panorama Road - Bastanchury Road)
PROPOSED TREATMENTS BY SEGMENT
• Upgrade existing northbound
and southbound bicycle
facilities to buffered bike lanes
Buffered Bike Lanes
B. Brea Boulevard (Panorama Road - Ashburn Terrace)
• Install a speed feedback sign
southbound and northbound
on Brea Boulevard
Speed Feedback Signage
91 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
CORRIDOR SNAPSHOT
Lane Reconfiguration and Buffered Bike Lanes
COMMONWEAL TH AVENUE (LIBRARY LANE TO BALCOM AVENUE)
Commonwealth Avenue between Library Lane to Balcom Avenue is centrally located within the City of Fullerton. The corridor has primarily commerical land use. Amerige Park is located on the southwest portion of the corridor, alongside Fullerton Community Center. Fullerton Public Library is located across the street on the northwest portion of the corridor.
CORRIDOR FEATURE
• Reconfigure the travel lanes to reduce
lanes from two lanes in each direction
with a center turn lane to one lane in each
direction with a center turn lane
• Install a buffered bike lane eastbound and
westbound
B. Brea Boulevard (Panorama Road - Ashburn Terrace)
92 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD & DOROTHY LANE
Scramble Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval
CORRIDOR SNAPSHOT
State College Boulevard & Dorothy Lane is the main entrance to California State University, Fullerton, on the west side of campus.
The Student Union is located adjacent to the northeast corner of the intersection.
There is a bus stop both northbound and southbound at this intersection, Orange County Transportation Authority Route 57:
Brea to Newport Beach.
INTERSECTION FEATURE
Retroreflective Backplate
• Install a scramble crossing to allow for a pedestrian only phase during which pedestrians can cross in all directions, including diagonally
• Install Leading Pedestrian Intervals at all four legs of the intersection
• Upgrade all traffic signal heads to include retroreflective backplates
• Install hardened centerlines on the north leg of the
intersection
CH 7.
IMPLEMENTATION &
NEXT STEPS
94 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Table 7.1 Summary of Estimated Costs by Project
# PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SOFT COSTS CONTINGENCY INFLATION TOTAL 1 Southwest Area $4,751,000 $1,430,280 $1,854,384 $927,192 $8,962,856 2 Harbor West Area $1,115,000 $412,200 $458,160 $229,080 $2,214,440 3 Euclid West Area $1,656,500 $563,820 $666,096 $333,048 $3,219,464 4 California State University,
Fullerton Area $11,707,000 $297,960 $301,488 $150,744 $12,457,192 5 Orangethorpe Avenue and
Adjacent Area $2,345,800 $756,824 $930,787 $465,394 $4,498,805 6 Commonwealth Avenue
Corridor $482,500 $235,100 $215,280 $107,640 $1,040,520 7 Malvern - Chapman Corridor $406,100 $213,708 $185,942 $92,971 $898,721 8 Harbor Boulevard Corridor $25,000 $107,000 $39,600 $19,800 $191,400 9 Bastanchury - Brea Corridor $764,000 $313,920 $323,376 $161,688 $1,562,984 10 Gilbert Avenue Corridor $644,000 $280,320 $277,296 $138,648 $1,340,264 TOTAL $23,896,900 $4,611,132 $5,252,409 $2,626,205 $36,386,646 Project Costs
The cost of each of the ten projects was estimated and can be used to inform applications for funding and City budgeting. The estimates are not final and are subject to change. Estimated costs are shown in Table 7.1. 95 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Policy and Process Recommendations
In alignment with the Safe System Approach, the following policy and process recommendations support the implementation and goals of the SS4A Action Plan.
Education
Improve public understanding of the rights of active
transportation users:
• Target high-risk intersections using Go Human
campaign materials to encourage drivers to watch for
active transportation users.
• Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle safety into physical education class in the Fullerton School District and
Fullerton Joint Union High School District.
Bolster awareness of the rules and regulations of the road:
• Use a social media advertising campaign, as well as
advertising at public events, to educate drivers on the dangers of unsafe driving and refresh the rules of the
road.
• Develop a website to provide resources such as
articles, game, and videos on the rules of the road and safe driving.
• Distribute flyers and present at community centers and schools to convey the rules of the road to vulnerable
populations, such as the elderly and children.
Progress Tracking and Transparency
Analyze data yearly to track trends and progress:
• Conduct a yearly safety analysis of collision trends
to track if new high-risk locations are emerging. If
locations with implemented treatments are improving,
then maintain a robust understanding of safety trends
on Fullerton roadways.
• Provide a public forum to allow submittal of comments in the year following the implementation of projects
in order to collect data regarding the functioning and
perception of projects.
Provide a platform for ongoing updates on the goals of the SS4A Action Plan:
• Report the results of the collision analysis annually in order, specifically informing the public of the progress toward reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries. • Provide the SS4A Action Plan on the City of Fullerton website, as well as a short, accessible description of
the Plan to ensure public awareness of the Plan and its goals.
96 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN
Implementation
The ten projects were ranked based on opportunity. Implementation should be reflective of this ranking, with high opportunity projects being pursued first. The timelines for implementation based on project ranking is show below:
Stage One
1 - 5 Years
1. Southwest Area
2. Harbor West Area
3. Euclid West Area
Stage Two
5 - 10 Years
4. California State University,
Fullerton Area
5. Orangethorpe Avenue and
Adjacent Area
6. Commonwealth Avenue
Corridor
7. Malvern - Chapman Corridor
Stage Three
10+ Years
8. Harbor Boulevard Corridor
9. Bastanchury - Brea Corridor
10. Gilbert Avenue Corridor
Appendix A
ENGAGEMENT
MATERIALS
Safe Streets And Roads For All Action Plan
Project Factsheet
CITY OF FULLERTON
The Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan aims to enhance the safety and accessibility of our streets and roadways for all users. This project focuses on reducing traffic-related injuries and fatalities through targeted infrastructure improvements and community engagement.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Improve Safety
Reduce traffic accidents and
fatalities through effective
road design and safety
measures.
Enhance Accessibility
Ensure streets and
roadways are accessible to
pedestrians, cyclists, and
people with disabilities.
Promote Safe Travel
Encourage safe and
responsible behavior among
all road users.
PROJECT TIMELINE
HOW YOU CAN GET INVOLVED
Attend Community Meetings
Participate in upcoming
meetings to provide your
input. Stay tuned for updates!
Scan this QR code to take
our survey!Questions?
Please contact the project team at 714-738-6899
Complete Surveys
Please complete our Community
Survey to help us identify traffic safety
issues and areas of concern!
Safe Streets And Roads For All Action Plan
Hoja informativa del proyecto
CITY OF FULLERTON
El “Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan” busca mejorar la seguridad y accesibilidad de nuestras calles y carreteras para todos los usuarios. Este proyecto aspira a reducir el número de accidentes y muertes causados por el tráfico con mejoras específicas de las infraestructuras y la participación de la comunidad.
DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROYECTO
OBJECTIVOS DEL PROYECTO
Mejorar la seguridad
Reducir los accidentes de
tráfico y las víctimas fatales
mediante un diseño eficaz
de las carreteras y mejores
medidas de seguridad.
Mejorar la accesibilidad
Asegurar que las calles y
carreteras sean accesibles
para peatones, ciclistas y
personas con discapacidad.
Promover viajes seguros
Promover un
comportamiento seguro y
responsable entre todos los
usuarios de la carretera.
CRONOLOGÍA DEL PROYECTO
#267881 #001385 #B47700 #8CB606 #9DA8B0
OBTENCIÓN DE
DATOS
ALCANCE COMUNITARIO
PREPARACIÓN DEL PLAN BORRADOR DEL PLAN
feb 2025
PLAN FINAL
Participación en eventos comunitarios #1
ago 2024
sept 2024
Taller de diseño
comunitario #1
sept 2024
Participación en eventos comunitarios #2
oct 2024
Taller de diseño
comunitario #2
feb 2025
Taller de diseño
comunitario #3
Participación en
eventos comunitarios #3
mayo 2024
sept 2024
mar 2025
CÓMO PARTICIPAR
Asistir a las reuniones comunitarias
Participe en las próximas reuniones
para dar su opinión. Manténgase
informado para conocer las próximas
fechas.
Escanear este código
QR para rellenar nuestra
encuesta.¿Preguntas?
Póngase en contacto con el equipo del proyecto: 714-738-6899 Completar encuestas
Por favor, rellene nuestra encuesta
comunitaria para ayudarnos a identi-
ficar los problemas de seguridad vial
y las áreas de mayor preocupación.
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리 실행 계획
프로젝트 안내문
CITY OF FULLERTON
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리(SS4A) 실행 계획은 모든 사용자를 위하여 도로와
거리를 안전하고 접근 가능하게 만드는 것을 목표로 합니다. 이 프로젝트는 교통사고
부상자 및 사망자를 줄이기 위해 맞춤형 인프라 개선과 지역 사회 참여를 중점적으로
추진합니다.
프로젝트 개요
목표 및 목적
안전 개선
효과적인 도로 설계와 안전
조치를 통해 교통 사고 및
사망자 수를 줄입니다.
접근성 향상
보행자, 자전거 이용자, 및
장애인을 포함한 모든 사람이
도로와 거리를 이용할 수
있도록 보장합니다.
안전한 여행 장려
모든 도로 사용자들 사이에서
안전하고 책임감 있는 행동을
장려합니다.
프로젝트 일정
프로젝트 참여 방법
지역 사회 회의 참석
다가오는 회의에 참여하셔서
의견을 제공해 주세요. 자세한
회의 일정은 추후 제공되니
업데이트를 계속 확인해 주세요!
QR code 를 스캔하여 설문 조사에
참여해보세요!
설문 조사 참여
교통 안전 문제와 우려되는 지역을 파악
하는 데 도움이 될 수 있도록 커뮤니티 설
문 조사를 완료해 주세요!
프로젝트 관련 질문이 있으신가요?
프로젝트 팀에 714-738-6899로 연락 주시기 바랍니다
Thursday, October 3, 2024
6:00 pm to 8:30 pm
Orangethorpe Elementary School
1400 S Brookhurst Rd, Fullerton, CA 92833
Scan this QR code to complete
the community survey
The City of Fullerton is committed to making our streets and roads safer for everyone. While our Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Plan is city- wide, this meeting will focus specifically on the neighborhood around Orangethorpe Elementary School. To help us develop an effective SS4A Plan, we need your input.
Please join us at our community-wide meeting to learn more about our efforts and ways for you to get involved!
Join Us to Build Safe Streets Together!
Orangethorpe Elementary
Neighborhood Meeting
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
Questions?
Please contact the project team at 714-738-6899
Jueves, 3 de octubre de 2024
De 6:00 pm a 8:30 pm
Orangethorpe Elementary School
1400 S Brookhurst Rd, Fullerton, CA 92833
Escanear este código QR
para completar la encuesta
comunitaria
La ciudad de Fullerton se ha comprometido a hacer nuestras calles y carreteras más seguras para todos. Aunque nuestro Plan de Calles y Carreteras Seguras para Todos (SS4A) se aplica a toda la ciudad, esta reunión se enfocará en la comunidad de alrededor de Orangethorpe Elementary. Necesitamos su opinión para ayudarnos a desarrollar un Plan SS4A efectivo.
Acompáñenos en esta reunión comunitaria para aprender sobre nuestros objetivos y las oportunidades de participación.
¡Acompáñenos a construir juntos calles más seguras!
Orangethorpe Elementary
Reunión Comunitaria
CALLES Y CARRETERAS SEGURAS
PARA TODOS
¿Preguntas?
Póngase en contacto con el equipo del proyecto en 714-738-6899 2024년 10월 3일 목요일
오후 6시- 8시 30분
Orangethorpe Elementary School
1400 S Brookhurst Rd, Fullerton, CA 92833
QR code 를 스캔하여 설문 조사에
참여해보세요!
플러튼시는 모든 사람을 위해 거리와 도로를 더 안전하게 만드는 데 노력하고
있습니다. 모두를 위한 안전한 거리와 도로를 위한 계획(SS4A)은 전 도시를
대상으로 하지만, 이번 지역사회 미팅은 특별히 오렌지솔프 초등학교 주변
지역에 초점을 맞출 것입니다. 효과적인 SS4A 계획을 개발하는 데 여러분의
의견이 필요합니다.
저희의 노력과 참여 방법에 대해 더 알아보시려면 지역 사회 회의에 꼭 참석해
주세요!
안전한 거리를 함께 만들어 가요!
오렌지솔프(Orangethorpe) 초등학교
지역 사회 회의
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리
프로젝트 관련 질문이 있으신가요?
프로젝트 팀에 714-738-6899로 연락 주시기 바랍니다.
Orangethorpe Elementary
Neighborhood Meeting
Orangethorpe Elementary School
Thursday, October 3, 2024
6:00 - 8:30 PM
Community concerns are collected
using project area basemap
posterboard.
Attendees have their questions and comments
addressed by the City Traffic Engineer while
interacting with the project area map.
Somewhat
Unsafe
Neutral
Very Unsafe
Very Safe
28.6%
28.6%
28.6%
14.3%
Speeding vehiclesSpeeding vehicles
Orangethorpe Elementary School, located near the intersection of Orangethorpe Avenue and Brookhurst Road, serves one of the most collision-prone areas in the City of Fullerton. Project team members and City staff met with residents of the surrounding community at the school to give a presentation about the project, explaining its goals and existing conditions. After the presentation, they conducted a mapping activity to gather community feedback on traffic safety in the area.
Following this, the project team and attendees shared their feedback.
Most attendees were families who live adjacent to
the school. They highlighted issues such as poor
sidewalk and lighting conditions on neighborhood
streets, inadequate signal timing at the intersection
of Brookhurst Road and Page Avenue, speeding along
Brookhurst Road and Page Avenue, and minimal
crossing opportunities along Orangethorpe Avenue.
GENERAL FEEDBACK
SURVEY TAKEAWAYSENGAGEMENT
9 Number of Attendees
7 Surveys Completed
How would you rate overall traffic safety
of the streets and roads in your area?
What are the most common safety concerns
you have about local streets and roads?
SPECIFIC CONCERNS
• Major streets Orangethorpe Avenue and
Brookhurst Road identified as having speeding
issues
• Brookurst Road identified as being difficult to
cross, especially near the school
• Neighborhood roads Page Avenue and Houston
Avenue identified as having speeding issues and
poor sidewalk conditions
Speeding Vehicles
Poor Road Conditions
Lack of ped crossing
Inadequate Signage
Traffic Congestion
Insufficient Street Lighting
7 4
2 1
1 1
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
Commonwealth Elementary
Multi-Purpose Room
2200 E Commonwealth Ave, Fullerton, CA 92831
Scan this QR code to complete
the community survey
The City of Fullerton is committed to making our streets and roads safer for everyone. While our Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Plan is city- wide, this meeting will focus specifically on the neighborhood around Commonwealth Elementary School. To help us develop an effective SS4A Plan, we need your input.
Please join us at our community-wide meeting to learn more about our efforts and ways for you to get involved!
Join Us to Build Safe Streets Together!
Commonwealth Elementary
Neighborhood Meeting
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
Questions?
Please contact the project team at [email protected] Miércoles, 13 de noviembre de 2024
De 6:00 pm a 8:00 pm
Commonwealth Elementary
Multi-Purpose Room
2200 E Commonwealth Ave, Fullerton, CA 92831
Escanear este código QR
para completar la encuesta
comunitaria
La ciudad de Fullerton se ha comprometido a hacer nuestras calles y carreteras más seguras para todos. Aunque nuestro Plan de Calles y Carreteras Seguras para Todos (SS4A) se aplica a toda la ciudad, esta reunión se enfocará en la comunidad de alrededor de Commonwealth Elementary. Necesitamos su opinión para ayudarnos a desarrollar un Plan SS4A efectivo.
Acompáñenos en esta reunión comunitaria para aprender sobre nuestros objetivos y las oportunidades de participación.
¡Acompáñenos a construir juntos calles más seguras!
Commonwealth Elementary
Reunión Comunitaria
CALLES Y CARRETERAS SEGURAS
PARA TODOS
¿Preguntas?
Póngase en contacto con el equipo del proyecto en [email protected] 2024년 11월 13일 수요일
오후 6시- 8시
Commonwealth Elementary
Multi-Purpose Room
2200 E Commonwealth Ave, Fullerton, CA 92831
QR code 를 스캔하여 설문 조사에
참여해보세요!
플러튼시는 모든 사람을 위해 거리와 도로를 더 안전하게 만드는 데 노력하고
있습니다. 모두를 위한 안전한 거리와 도로를 위한 계획(SS4A)은 전 도시를
대상으로 하지만, 이번 지역사회 미팅은 특별히 커먼웰스 초등학교 주변 지역에
초점을 맞출 것입니다. 효과적인 SS4A 계획을 개발하는 데 여러분의 의견이
필요합니다.
저희의 노력과 참여 방법에 대해 더 알아보시려면 지역 사회 회의에 꼭 참석해
주세요!
안전한 거리를 함께 만들어 가요!
커먼웰스(Commonwealth) 초등학교
지역 사회 회의
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리
프로젝트 관련 질문이 있으신가요?
프로젝트 팀에 [email protected] 으로 이메일 주시기 바랍니다.
Orangethorpe Elementary
Neighborhood Meeting
Orangethorpe Elementary School
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
6:00 - 8:00 PM
Community concerns are collected
using project area basemap
posterboard.
Attendees listen to a presentation given by
Project team members and City staff.
Somewhat
Safe
Neutral
Somewhat
Unsafe
Very Unsafe
33.3%
33.3%
22.2%
11.1%
Speeding vehiclesSpeeding vehicles
Commonwealth Elementary School, located near the intersection of Commonwealth Avenue and State College Boulevard, serves one of the most collision-prone areas in the City of Fullerton. Project team members and City staff met with residents of the surrounding community at the school to give a presentation about the project, explaining its goals and existing conditions. After the presentation, they conducted a mapping activity to gather community feedback on traffic safety in the area.
Following this, the project team and attendees shared their feedback.
Many attendees are Fullerton residents from various
parts of the city, including bike advocacy group
members. They shared concerns such as hazardous
conditions for cyclists along Commonwealth Avenue
and Lemon Street, speeding issues along Harbor
Boulevard in the Downtown Fullerton area, and poor
sidewalk and lighting conditions on local streets.
GENERAL FEEDBACK
SURVEY TAKEAWAYSENGAGEMENT
9 Number of Attendees
9 Surveys Completed
How would you rate overall traffic safety
of the streets and roads in your area?
What are the most common safety concerns
you have about local streets and roads?
SPECIFIC CONCERNS
• Bastanchury Road between Harbor Blvd and area
immediately south of St. Jude Hospital parking
structure identified as having a sidewalk gap.
• Commonwealth Avenue and Lemon Street
identified as not having bicycle lanes, leaving
cyclists exposed to unsafe road conditions
• Brea Boulevard, Harbor Boulevard, Lemon Street,
and Bastanchury Road identified as having
speeding issues.
Inadequate Signage 4
Lack of Ped Crossing 6
Poor Road Conditions 5
Insufficient Street Lighting 6
Speeding Vehicles 7
Bicycle Safety 8
Scan this QR code
to join the zoom
meeting!
Tuesday, December 16, 2025
6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
Join us on Zoom!
https://bit.ly/SS4A_ZOOM
Scan this QR code
to complete the
community survey!
The City of Fullerton is committed to making our streets and roads safer for everyone.
Please join us on this virtual meeting to learn about what the City is proposing at several locations throughout the city.
Join Us to Build Safe Streets Together!
Zoom Meeting
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
Questions?
Please contact the project team at 714-738-6899
Escanee este código
QR para unirse a la
reunión de Zoom.
Martes, 16 de Diciembre de 2025
6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
¡Únase a nosotros en Zoom!
https://bit.ly/SS4A_ZOOM
Escanee este código
QR para completar
la encuesta
comunitaria.
La Ciudad de Fullerton está comprometida a hacer que
nuestras calles y carreteras sean más seguras para todos.
Únase a nosotros en esta reunión virtual para conocer lo que la Ciudad está proponiendo en varios lugares a lo largo de la ciudad.
¡Únase a nosotros para construir calles seguras juntos! Reunión por Zoom
CALLES Y CARRETERAS SEGURAS
PARA TODOS
¿Preguntas?
Por favor comuníquese con el equipo del proyecto al 714-738-6899
;PPN핛폓
?폯옧졷핷23
?싟읿킧?켻풗
뽇퓗핿풗핿
6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
;PPN폓켟볛켻풗
https://bit.ly/SS4A_ZOOM
?즧샋켧줻핇
푇웏옧졷핷23
?싟읿킧?켻풗
엯?탟삗좫싣캯얏핇픇쇇왟푃멳잯읿셗퍋혇몏
쟏싟삗셳?켣핇샧뫣햋킸샋샧
탟혇폰폯엯픇?폓켟탟먃혟퍋뫣햋삗뺷풬핇퍏퍇쫷밳
픇핷쪋먃컄핛폓?폯훿켻풗
볛퍋혇멳잯읿쟏싧펷뺛먃풗
;PPN핛
좫쉓읿픇퍋혇멳잯푃쇇왟
ퟋ줻핷햋픿탣먃풗
줻핛캯핃왟왟혠폓폳얀켻풗
Downtown Fullerton
Farmers Market
Community Event Attendance #1
Thursday, August 22, 2024
4:30 - 8:30 PM
Community concerns are collected using
project area basemap posterboard.
Attendees interact with the poster board
while the project team assists with input and
answers questions.
Poor road conditions
Speeding vehicles
Insufficient lighting
Bicycle safety
24 21
12 11
Inadequate signage
Lack of ped crossing
Traffic congestion
8 8
7 The Downtown Fullerton Farmers Market, a seasonal open-air weekly event, brings together local vendors and community members, offering unique products and services in a fun and festive atmosphere. Project team members attended to introduce the project, explain its goals, distribute surveys, and gather community feedback on driving, walking, biking, and public transit conditions in Fullerton.
Most attendees raised safety concerns about both
major streets and local neighborhood roads. They
highlighted issues such as poor sidewalk and road
conditions, speeding, and inadequate infrastructure
for pedestrians and cyclists. Participants included
both residents and non-residents, with many of the
resident families arriving at the event location by
car or on foot.
GENERAL FEEDBACK
SURVEY TAKEAWAYSENGAGEMENT
100 +
Number of Attendees
30 Surveys Completed
How would you rate overall traffic safety
of the streets and roads in your area?
What are the most common safety concerns
you have about local streets and roads?
Somewhat
Safe
Neutral
Somewhat
Unsafe
Very Safe
Very Unsafe
40%
26.7%
20%
6.7%
6.7%
SPECIFIC CONCERNS
• Orangethorpe Ave, Chapman Ave, Malvern Ave,
and Gilbert St identified as having speeding
issue
•
Commonwealth Ave, Acacia Ave, and Raymond
Ave identified as ha
ving potholes making it
dangerous
Fullerton Police Department
Trunk or Treat Event
Community Event Attendance #2
Friday, October 25, 2024
5:00- 8:00 PM
The project team set up community input
boards to gather feedback and concerns
from local residents.
Attendees complete a survey while the
project team provides general information
and answers questions.
The City of Fullerton Trunk or Treat Event, hosted by the Fullerton Police Department, is an annual Halloween-themed event bringing together families, City staff, and other members of the community in a festive atmosphere. Project team members attended to introduce the project, explain its goals, distribute surveys (and candy), and gather community feedback on driving, walking, biking, and public transit conditions in Fullerton.
Most attendees raised safety concerns about both
major streets and local neighborhood roads. They
highlighted issues such as poor road conditions,
speeding, and inadequate infrastructure for
pedestrians. Participants included residents, non-
residents, and City staff from the police and fire
departments. Many of the resident families arriving
at the event location by car or on foot.
GENERAL FEEDBACK
SURVEY TAKEAWAYSENGAGEMENT
100 +
Number of Attendees
20 Surveys Completed
How would you rate overall traffic safety
of the streets and roads in your area?
What are the most common safety concerns
you have about local streets and roads?
SPECIFIC CONCERNS
• Orangethorpe Ave, Commonwealth Ave,
Malvern Ave, and State College Blvd identified
as having speeding issues
• Euclid St, Chapman Ave, and Commonwealth
Ave identified as having potholes and/or uneven
sidewalks, making it dangerous for vehicles and
pedestrians
12 Poor Road Conditions
10 Speeding Vehicles
6 Lack of ped crossing
5 Insufficient Street Lighting
5 Bicycle Safety
2 Inadequate Signage
Somewhat
Unsafe
Neutral
Somewhat
Safe
Very Safe
65%
15%
5%
15%
Downtown Fullerton
Farmer’s Market
Community Event Attendance #3
Thursday, September 25, 2025
4:30- 8:30 PM
Residents referenced the provided map to check out treatments in areas they frequent.
The project team set up input boards to gain feedback on specific countermeasure types.
The Downtown Fullerton Farmer’s Market, presented by the City of Fullerton and the Fullerton Parks and Recreation Department, is a weekly event running April through September which hosts local vendors and live music to bring together families, City staff, and other members of the community in a festive atmosphere. Project team members attended to gather feedback on proposed project recommendations and answer questions.
Most attendees expressed support for the proposed
treatments, especially those improving the pedestrian
experience such as LPIs, curb extensions, RRFBs,
and high visbility crosswalks. Participants were also
in favor of bicycle facility improvements such as bike
lanes and turn boxes. Many noted that the proposed
treatments would improve their experience at
intersections that they frequent.
Some attendees expressed concern about roadway
changes such as lane reconfiguration and curb
extensions citing concerns of increased congestion
and construction cost.
Several attendees requested additional information
and were excited to hear that a survey would be
made available to submit feedback, noting that they
would share the survey with their community when it
came available.
Attendees were grateful for the City’s outreach
efforts and to see investment in Fullerton roadways.
Participants included residents, non-residents, and
City staff from the police and fire departments. Many
of the resident families arriving at the event location by car or on foot.
GENERAL FEEDBACK
ENGAGEMENT
100 +
Number of Attendees
30 Number Engaged
10 Information Sign-Ups
HOW DID YOU GET HERE TODAY?
¿Cómo Llegó hoy?
어떤 교통 수단을 이용하셨나요?
Instructions: Please place a sticker on which mode of transportation you used to get here today.
Instrucciones: por favor Ponga una pegatina para indicar qué medio de transporte utilizó usted para llegar aquí hoy. 참여방법: 오실 때 이용하신 교통 수단에 스티커를 붙여주세요.
?
WALK
Caminando
도보
BIKE
Andando en bicicleta
자전거
BUS
Autobús
버스
CAR
Vehículo
자동차
CARPOOL
Vehículo Compartído
카풀
OTHER
Otro
기타
FULLERTON RESIDENT
RESIDENTE DE FULLERTON
플러튼 주민
FULLERTON VISITOR
VISITANTE DE FULLERTON
플러튼 방문자
SAFETY CONCERN
Preocupaciónes de seguridad
교통안전 우려 사항
School / Escuela / 학교
CSUFullerton
City Hall / Municipalidad / 시청
Public Library / Biblioteca / 도서관
Metrolink / Metrolink / 메트로링크
Metrolink Station / Estación Metrolink / 메트로링크 역
Transportation Center / Centro de Transporte / 대중교통센터
Airport / Aeropuerto / 공항
Park / Parque / 공원
University / Universidad / 대학교
City Boundary / Límite de la Ciudad / 도시경계
CITY OF FULLERTONAREAS OF CONCERN
Lugares de preocupación
안전 우려 지역
Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A) Action Plan
Plan de Calles Seguras
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리 실행 계획
CITY OF FULLERTON
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
Community Survey
We are committed to making our streets and roads safer for everyone. To help us develop an effective Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Plan, we need your input. This survey aims to gather your experiences, concerns, and suggestions regarding road safety in your community. The survey should take no more than 5 minutes to complete.
1 of 2
Q1. How would you rate overall traffic safety of the
streets and roads in your area?
Very safe
Somewhat safe
Neutral
Somewhat unsafe
Very unsafe
Q2. What are the most common safety concerns you
have about local streets and roads? (Select all that
apply)
Speeding vehicles
Poor road conditions (e.g., potholes, cracks)
Lack of pedestrian crossings
Insufficient street lighting
Bicycle safety
Traffic congestion
Inadequate signage
Other (please specify)
Q3. How would you rate the overall condition of
roads and sidewalks in your neighborhood?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Q4. Which safety improvements would you like to
see in your community? (Select all that apply)
Improved traffic signal timing
Improved pedestrian crossings
Road repairs and maintenance
More traffic calming measures (e.g., speed
bumps)
More enforcement
Enhanced public transportation options
Other (please specify)
Q5. How frequently do you use alternative transpor-
tation methods (e.g., biking, walking, public transit)
in your daily routine?
Daily
Several times a week
Occasionally
Rarely
Never
Q6. How effective do you think the current measures
are for protecting pedestrians and cyclists in your
area?
Very effective
Somewhat effective
Neutral
Somewhat ineffective
Very ineffective
Next Page
CITY OF FULLERTON
SAFE STREET AND ROADS FOR ALL
Q7. Where are your areas of concern relating to street safety in Fullerton? These areas of concern could include places where you’ve witnessed pedestrian and bike crashes with cars, unsafe street designs or conditions, and/or a lack of amenities such as sidewalks or bike lanes.
Please write the locations and your reasons for selecting them. Please be as specific as you can.
Location of Concern Safety Issue
Q8. What additional comments or suggestions do you have regarding street and road safety in your community? (Open-ended response)
Thank you for taking time to give your feedback!
Please join our mailing list to get the latest project updates! Name
Email Address
2 of 2
CIUDAD DE FULLERTON
Safe Streets And Roads For All Action Plan
Encuesta comunitaria
Estamos comprometidos a hacer que nuestras calles y carreteras sean más seguras para todos.
Necesitamos su opinión para ayudarnos a desarrollar un “Safe Streets and Roads for All Action Plan” con el fin de mejorar la seguridad de peatones y ciclistas en Fullerton. Esta encuesta busca recoger sus experiencias, preocupaciones y recomendaciones sobre la seguridad de las vías públicas en su comunidad. La encuesta no le llevará más de 5 minutos.
1 de 2
Q1. ¿Cómo evaluaría la seguridad general del tráfico
en las calles y carreteras de su vecindario?
Muy seguro
Algo seguro
Neutro
Algo inseguro
Muy inseguro
Q2. ¿Cuáles son los problemas de seguridad que más
le preocupan en las calles y carreteras locales?
(Seleccione todo lo que se aplique)
Vehículos con exceso de velocidad
Mal estado de la carretera (baches, grietas, etc)
Falta de cruces peatonales
Iluminación insuficiente de las calles
Seguridad en bicicleta
Congestión del tráfico
Insuficiente letreros de dirección
Otros (por favor, especifique)
Q3. ¿Cómo evaluaría el estado general de las
carreteras y aceras de su vecindario?
Excelente
Bien
Aceptable
Mal
Muy deficiente
Q4. ¿Qué mejoras de seguridad le gustaría ver en su
comunidad? (Seleccione todo lo que se aplique)
Mejoras en la sincronización de los semáforos
Mejoras en los cruces peatonales
Reparación y mantenimiento de las carreteras
Más mejoras para calmar el tráfico
(p. ej., tope de velocidad)
Más cumplimiento de las leyes de tráfico
Mejores opciones de transporte público
Otros (por favor especifique)
Q5. ¿Con qué frecuencia utiliza medios de transporte
alternativos (p. ej., bicicleta, a pie, transporte público) en su rutina diaria?
A diario
Varias veces por semana
De vez en cuando
En raras ocasiones
Nunca
Q6. ¿Qué grado de protección cree que ofrecen las
infraestructuras actuales a los peatones y ciclistas de su vecindario?
Muy eficaz
Algo eficaz
Neutro
Algo ineficaz
Muy ineficaz
Página Siguiente
CIUDAD DE FULLERTON
Safe Streets And Roads For All Action Plan
Q7. ¿Cuáles son las áreas de peligro en relación con la seguridad peatonal en Fullerton? Estas áreas de preocupación podrían incluir lugares donde ha observado colisiones de peatones y ci- clistas con vehículos, diseños o condiciones inseguras de las calles y/o falta de comodidades como acer
as o carriles bici. Escriba los lugares y sus razones para seleccionarlos. Sea lo más específico posible.
iugar=de=aificultad Razón
Q8. ¿Qué otros comentarios o recomendaciones le gustaría compartir en relación con la seguridad vial en su comunidad?
Gracias por dedicarnos su tiempo.
Suscríbase a nuestra lista de correo para recibir las últimas noticias sobre el proyecto.
Nombre
Correo electrónico
2 de 2
CITY OF FULLERTON
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리 실행 계획
커뮤니티 설문 조사
우리는 모든 사람에게 더 안전한 도로와 거리를 만들기 위하여 노력하고 있습니다. 모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리(SS4A) 실행 계획을 효과적으로 수립하기 위해서는 여러분의 의견이 필요합니다. 이 설문 조사는 여러분의 경험, 우려 사항, 그리고 지역 사회의 도로 안전에 대한 제안을 수집하기 위한 것입니다. 설문 조사는 5분 이내에 완료하실 수 있습니다.
1 of 2
Q1. 귀하의 지역 도로와 거리에 대한 전반적인 교통 안전
수준을 어떻게 평가하시겠습니까?
매우 안전함
다소 안전함
보통
다소 위험함
매우 위험함
Q2. 지역 도로와 거리에 대해 가장 우려되는 안전 문제는
무엇인가요? (해당되는 모든 항목을 선택해 주세요)
속도 위반 차량
도로 상태 불량 (예: 움푹 패인 곳, 균열)
보행자 횡단보도 부족
불충분한 가로등
자전거 안전
교통 혼잡
불충분한 표지판
기타 (구체적으로 기재해 주세요)
Q3. 귀하의 동네 도로와 인도(보도)의 전반적인 상태를
어떻게 평가하시겠습니까?
아주 우수함
좋음
보통
나쁨
아주 나쁨
Q4. 귀하의 지역 사회에는 어떤 안전 개선 사항들이 필요
한가요? (해당되는 모든 항목을 선택해 주세요)
교통 신호 주기/타이밍 개선
보행자 횡단보도 개선
도로 수리 및 유지 관리
속도 완화 조치 추가 (예: 과속 방지턱)
교통 단속 강화
대중교통 옵션 개선
기타 (구체적으로 기재해 주세요)
Q5. 일상에서 대체 교통 수단 (예: 자전거, 도보, 대중교
통)을 얼마나 자주 이용하시나요?
매일
주 3~4회
주 1~2회
가끔
거의 이용하지 않음
Q6. 귀하의 지역에서 보행자와 자전거 이용자를 보호하
기 위한 현재의 조치가 얼마나 효과적이라고 생각하시나
요?
매우 효과적임
다소 효과적임
보통
다소 비효과적임
매우 비효과적임
다음 페이지
CITY OF FULLERTON
모두를 위한 안전한 도로와 거리 실행 계획
Q7. 플러튼에서 거리 안전과 관련하여 우려되는 지역은 어디인가요?
우려되는 지역에는 교통사고가 잦은 곳, 보행자나 자전거가 차량과 충돌한 곳, 안전하지 않은 도로 설계나 상 태, 보도나 자전거 도로와 같은 시설 부족 등이 포함될 수 있습니다. 해당 위치와 선택한 이유를 구체적으로 작성해 주세요. 가능한 한 자세히 기재해 주시기 바랍니다.
우려되는 곳 안전 이슈
Q8. 귀하의 지역 사회에서 도로와 거리 안전에 대해 추가로 의견이나 제안하실 사항이 있나요? (주관식 답변) 피드백을 제공해 주셔서 감사합니다!
최신 프로젝트 업데이트를 받으시려면 저희 메일링 리스트에 가입해 주세요!
이름
이메일
2 of 2
Appendix B
PROPOSED
TREATMENTS
PrimaryRd SecondaryRd Treatment Leg Notes Comments Project Brea Blvd Ashburn Ter APS E-W Bastanchury-Brea
Bastanchury Rd Brea Blvd Bike Box E No other legs? Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Ashwood Cir High Visibility Crosswalk N Note: Private Roadway Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Fairway Isles Dr High Visibility Crosswalk All Okay, lighting concerns also... Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Payne Stewart Dr High Visibility Crosswalk All Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd State College Blvd High Visibility Crosswalk All Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Torrey Pine Dr High Visibility Crosswalk N Note: Private Roadway Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd Ashburn Ter High Visibility Crosswalk All Trail enterance Okay Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd Lemon St High Visibility Crosswalk All Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Fairway Isles Dr LPI N-S Sports Complex / Fullerton Concert Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd State College Blvd LPI E-W Okay Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd Ashburn Ter LPI E-W Okay, maybe upgrade to APS too? Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd Lemon St LPI N-S Sports fields Okay Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd Panorama Rd LPI E-W Sports fields Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Associated Rd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd Brea Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd State College Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd Lemon St Rumble Strip SB Just along chevron area? Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd between St. Jude Medical Center Parking and Brea Dam Trail Sidewalk Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd between Brea Blvd and State College Blvd Speed Feedback Sign EB Okay, and how about replacing the existing one on the other s Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd between Harbor Blvd and Fairway Isles Dr Speed Feedback Sign WB Why not both directions? Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd between State College Blvd and Associated Rd Speed Feedback Sign EB Okay, but I worry about the trees blocking the solar panel to ch Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd between Bastanchury Rd and Panorama Rd Speed Feedback Sign SB Why not both directions? Bastanchury-Brea Bastanchury Rd between Brea Blvd and East Limit Upgrade to Protected Bike Lane Bastanchury-Brea Brea Blvd between Panorama Rd and Bastanchury Rd Upgrade to Protected Bike Lane Bastanchury-Brea Commonwealth Ave Lillie Ave Curb Extension NW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, truck turning, and lighting concerns... Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave Yale Ave Curb Extension NW&SE Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, truck turning, lighting concerns... Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave Acacia Ave Hardened Centerline E-W Depends on what we are proposing, no glue-down type deline Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave Lillie Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow S We'll need to check the property lines, this may be school propCommonwealth Commonwealth Ave between Library Ln and Balcom Ave Lane Reconfiguration Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave Acacia Ave LPI All Okay Commonwealth
Commonwealth Ave Lillie Ave LPI All Okay Commonwealth
Commonwealth Ave State College Blvd LPI All Okay Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave Acacia Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave Brookhurst Rd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Commonwealth Commonwealth Ave State College Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Commonwealth Nutwood Ave Commonwealth Ave Bike Box S Nutwood ATP We'll make sure to convery this to ATP and bridge design... CSUF Area State College Blvd Dorothy Ln Hardened Centerline N Depends on what we are proposing, no glue-down type deline CSUF Area Commonwealth Ave College Pl High Visibility Crosswalk E&W Lighting concerns, no xwalk on east side currently... CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd CA-57 (NB) High Visibility Crosswalk N Caltrans ROW CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd CA-57 (SB) High Visibility Crosswalk N&E Caltrans ROW CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Deerpark Dr High Visibility Crosswalk All This could be a good LPI location CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Stadium Wy High Visibility Crosswalk S This is most likely on private property... CSUF Area Nutwood Ave between State College Blvd and CA-57 Lighting N&S 369, 370, and 371 are all the same... There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area Nutwood Ave between State College Blvd and CA-57 Lighting N&S There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area Nutwood Ave between State College Blvd and CA-57 Lighting N&S There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area State College Blvd between Yorba Linda Blvd and Nutwood Ave Lighting E&W 364, 365, 366, 367, and 368 are all the same... There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area State College Blvd between Yorba Linda Blvd and Nutwood Ave Lighting E&W There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area State College Blvd between Yorba Linda Blvd and Nutwood Ave Lighting E&W There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area State College Blvd between Yorba Linda Blvd and Nutwood Ave Lighting E&W There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area State College Blvd between Yorba Linda Blvd and Nutwood Ave Lighting E&W There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd between State College Blvd and CA-57 Lighting N&S 361, 362, and 363 are all the same... There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd between State College Blvd and CA-57 Lighting N&S There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd between State College Blvd and CA-57 Lighting N&S There is existing lighting, an upgrade would be nice, but it coul CSUF Area Nutwood Ave Commonwealth Ave LPI All Nutwood ATP We'll make sure to incorporate into Nutwood ATP. CSUF Area Nutwood Ave Titan Dr LPI All Nutwood ATP We'll make sure to incorporate into Nutwood ATP. CSUF Area State College Blvd Arts Dr LPI E-W Okay CSUF Area
State College Blvd Dorothy Ln LPI All Okay CSUF Area
State College Blvd Nutwood Ave LPI All Okay CSUF Area
State College Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd LPI All Okay CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Associated Rd LPI N&S&W Okay CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Deerpark Dr LPI All CSUF Area
Nutwood Ave between State College Blvd and Placentia Ave Nutwood Avenue Project Concept Design in Appendix CSUF Area Nutwood Ave Commonwealth Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Nutwood ATP Intersection is having new design done due to bridge from CSU CSUF Area State College Blvd Dorothy Ln Retroreflective Backplate All Okay CSUF Area PrimaryRd SecondaryRd Treatment Leg Notes Comments Project State College Blvd Nutwood Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay CSUF Area State College Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Associated Rd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Deerpark Dr Retroreflective Backplate All Okay CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd Placentia Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay CSUF Area Commonwealth Ave College Pl RRFB E-W or HAWK Signal No HAWK signal, I'd rather not encourage people to cross here CSUF Area State College Blvd Ranch Dr RRFB E-W or HAWK Signal Not onboard with RRFB on 6 lane arterial, HAWK could work, b CSUF Area State College Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd Rumble Strip SB Where do we want to install this? CSUF Area State College Blvd Dorothy Ln Scramble Crosswalk All Maybe, only for certain hours, but we'll really have to think ab CSUF Area Yorba Linda Blvd between State College Blvd and Almira Ave Sidewalk CSUF shares the lot with church CSUF Area Citrus Ave Hill Ave Curb Extension NW&SW into Hill Ave, Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces Drainage, lighting, truck turning concerns... Euclid West Citrus Ave Olive Ave Curb Extension SW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, lighting, truck turning concerns... Euclid West Hill Ave Cul-de-sac Curb Extension SE into Hill Ave, Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces Drainage, lighting, truck turning concerns... Euclid West Lee Ave Oak Ave Curb Extension All Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Euclid West Orchard Ave Olive Ave Curb Extension NE&NW&SE Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, trucks, and lighting concerns.... Euclid West Basque Ave Elm Wy Curb Ramp NE&SE Okay Euclid West
Basque Ave Porter Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Euclid West
Basque Ave Southgate Ave Curb Ramp NE&SE Okay, but why not bring the other side up to ADA compliance a Euclid West Citrus Ave Ash Ave Curb Ramp All Okay, but where would the SWC ramp go? Euclid West Lee Ave Ash Ave Curb Ramp NE&NW Okay, but why not bring the other side up to ADA compliance a Euclid West Lee Ave Southgate Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Euclid West
Orchard Ave Hill Ave Curb Ramp SE&SW Okay Euclid West
Orchard Ave Porter Ave Curb Ramp NE&SE Okay Euclid West Basque Ave Southgate Ave Detectable Warning Surface NW&SW Euclid West Lee Ave Ash Ave Detectable Warning Surface NW&SW Euclid West Basque Ave Hill Ave Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE Okay, but what about drainage, trucks, etc...? Euclid West Basque Ave Olive Ave Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE Drainage, trucks, etc... Euclid West Basque Ave Valencia Dr Gateway Curb Extension NE&NW Drainage, truck turning, and lighting concerns... Euclid West Basque Ave Valencia Dr Gateway Curb Extension SE&SW Drainage, truck turning, and lighting concerns... Euclid West Euclid St Hill Ave/Southgate Ave Gateway Curb Extension NW&SW Drainage, truck turning, lighting concerns... Euclid West Basque Ave Hill Ave High Visibility Crosswalk E Lighting concerns Euclid West Basque Ave Olive Ave High Visibility Crosswalk E Lighting concerns Euclid West Lee Ave Olive Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow N&S Not sure about this, also there are lighting concerns... Euclid West Euclid St Hill Ave/Southgate Ave LPI All Okay Euclid West Euclid St Hill Ave/Southgate Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Euclid West Euclid St Valencia Dr Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Euclid West Citrus Ave Hill Ave RRFB N-S Okay Euclid West
Euclid St between Ash Ave and Hill Ave Speed Feedback Sign SB Okay with subscription for remote access... Euclid West Euclid St between Southgate Ave and Orangethorpe Ave Speed Feedback Sign NB Okay with subscription for remote access... Euclid West Citrus Ave Elm Stop Sign & Marking W From the cul-de-sac or the NB leg? Euclid West Citrus Ave Oak Ave Stop Sign & Marking W Okay Euclid West Citrus Ave Porter Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Euclid West Citrus Ave West Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Euclid West Lee Ave Elm Ave Stop Sign & Marking W Okay Euclid West
Lee Ave Hill Ave Stop Sign & Marking all way? Euclid West Lee Ave Oak Ave Stop Sign & Marking E&W all way? Or just E/W? Euclid West Lee Ave Olive Ave Stop Sign & Marking N&S Need to check all-way stop warrant, what about just E/W? Euclid West Lee Ave Southgate Ave Stop Sign & Marking W Okay Euclid West Orchard Ave Porter Ave Stop Sign & Marking E Okay Euclid West Orchard Ave Olive Ave Yield Marking E&W Euclid West
Gilbert St Pioneer Ave Bike Box N&E What about S leg? Gilbert Malvern Ave Gilbert St Bike Box W Okay Gilbert
Gilbert St Hughes Dr High Visibility Crosswalk N&E We have stamped concrete for the east leg... Gilbert Gilbert St Stern Goodman St/Bramble Wy High Visibility Crosswalk All Shopping Center Okay but what about upgrading the lighting as well? Gilbert Malvern Ave Gilbert St High Visibility Crosswalk All Okay Gilbert Gilbert St between Rosecrans Ave and Malvern Ave Lane Reconfiguration Gilbert Gilbert St Stern Goodman St Lighting All Upgrade lighting Gilbert Gilbert St Hughes Dr LPI E-W Okay Gilbert
Gilbert St Rosecrans Ave LPI All Park Okay Gilbert
Gilbert St Stern Goodman St/Bramble Wy LPI E-W Okay Gilbert Gilbert St between Rosecrans Ave and Malvern Ave Protected Bike Lane Gilbert Gilbert St Rosecrans Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Gilbert Malvern Ave Gilbert St Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Gilbert Gilbert St Loma Alta Dr Rumble Strip SB Where do we want to do this? We're going to get calls if we in Gilbert Gilbert St Stern Goodman St Rumble Strip SB Where? We're going to get a lot of calls if we do this... Gilbert PrimaryRd SecondaryRd Treatment Leg Notes Comments Project Gilbert St between Hughes Dr and Stern Goodman St Speed Feedback Sign NB Downhill Note, existing feedback sign between Pioneer and Daphne. Als Gilbert Gilbert St between Rosecrans Ave and Pioneer Ave Speed Feedback Sign SB Downhill There's an existing one @ Gilbert/Daphne, we should install it Gilbert Harbor Blvd Bastanchury Rd LPI E-W Medical center Okay Harbor Harbor Blvd Brea Blvd LPI All Okay Harbor
Harbor Blvd Hermosa Dr LPI E-W Okay Harbor
Harbor Blvd Valencia Mesa Dr LPI E-W Medical center Okay Harbor Harbor Blvd Bastanchury Rd Retroreflective Backplate Okay Harbor Harbor Blvd Brea Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Harbor Highland Ave Valencia Dr Bike Box All Okay Harbor West
Highland Ave Baker Ave Curb Extension NE&NW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, truck turning, lighting concerns... Harbor West Highland Ave Elm Ave Curb Extension SE&SW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, truck turning, lighting concerns... Harbor West Highland Ave Rosslynn Ave Curb Extension NE&SE Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Harbor West Richman Ave Valencia Dr Curb Extension NW&SE Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, truck turning, lighting concerns... Harbor West Richman Ave Gage Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Harbor West
Richman Ave Hill Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Harbor West
Richman Ave Knepp Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Harbor West
Richman Ave Rosslynn Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Harbor West Richman Ave Southgate Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Harbor West Richman Ave Woodcrest Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Harbor West Harbor Blvd Ash Ave Gateway Curb Extension NW&SW Drainage, truck turning concerns... Harbor West Harbor Blvd Rosslynn Ave Gateway Curb Extension NW&SW Drainage, truck turning concerns... Harbor West Highland Ave Knepp Ave High Visibility Crosswalk E&W Lighting concerns Harbor West Highland Ave Rosslynn Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow E Should this be E-Leg? Harbor West Richman Ave Ash Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow W RRFB? yield to ped sign? Harbor West Richman Ave Elm Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow W RRFB? We've been getting a lot of calls about this intersection Harbor West Richman Ave Gage Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow W Lighting concerns Harbor West Richman Ave Rosslynn Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow W Lighting concerns Harbor West Richman Ave West Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow E&W Assuming N/S x-walk on each side? Lighting concerns... Harbor West Richman Ave Woodcrest Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow W Lighting concerns Harbor West Richman Ave West Ave Lighting NE Harbor West
Highland Ave Valencia Dr LPI All Okay Harbor West
Richman Ave Elm Ave RRFB E-W Okay Harbor West
Richman Ave Knepp Ave RRFB E-W Okay, and also lighting concerns... Harbor West Richman Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Harbor West Malvern Ave Basque Ave/Carhart Ave Curb Extension NW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Okay, drainage, lighting concerns... maybe realignment of strip Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Basque Ave/Carhart Ave Curb Ramp SE&SW Very limited space due to bridge, not sure how we can accomp Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Euclid St Curb Ramp SE&SW We are somewhat limited on space due to this being a bridge o Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Basque Ave/Carhart Ave Hardened Centerline E-W Depends on what we are proposing, no stick-down type deline Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave/Chapman Ave Woods Ave Hardened Centerline E-W Depends on what we are proposing, no glue-down type deline Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave CA-57 High Visibility Crosswalk N Caltrans ROW Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave CA-57 High Visibility Crosswalk S Caltrans ROW Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Commonwealth Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N&W Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Drake Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S Okay but also lighting concerns Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Bastanchury Rd High Visibility Crosswalk All Park Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave between Ford Ave and Highland Ave Lighting N There is existing street lighting, perhaps upgrading... but may b Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave between Highland Ave and Malden Ave Lighting N There is existing street lighting, perhaps upgrading... but may b Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave between Malden Ave and Harbor Blvd Lighting N There is existing street lighting, perhaps upgrading... but may b Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave between Richman Ave and Ford Ave Lighting N There is existing street lighting, perhaps upgrading... but may b Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Acacia Ave LPI All Okay Malvern-Chapman
Chapman Ave Berkeley Ave LPI All Okay Malvern-Chapman
Chapman Ave Lawrence Ave LPI All Fullerton College Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Lemon St LPI All Okay Malvern-Chapman
Chapman Ave Pomona Ave LPI All Okay Malvern-Chapman
Chapman Ave Raymond Ave LPI All Okay Malvern-Chapman
Chapman Ave Richman Ave LPI N-S Park Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave State College Blvd LPI All Okay Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Basque Ave/Carhart Ave LPI N-S School hours Okay Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Bastanchury Rd LPI E-W Okay Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave between West Limit and Gilbert St Protected Bike Lane Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Commonwealth Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Harbor Blvd Retroreflective Backplate N&E&W HSIP Improvement Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Lemon St Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave Raymond Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Malvern-Chapman Chapman Ave State College Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Malvern-Chapman Malvern Ave Bastanchury Rd Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Malvern-Chapman PrimaryRd SecondaryRd Treatment Leg Notes Comments Project Page Ave between Courtney Ave and Brookhurst Rd Edgeline Treatment Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Lemon St Hardened Centerline N-S Shared intersection with Anaheim, this type of improvement m Orangethorpe Page Ave between Courtney Ave and Brookhurst Rd Sidewalk Orangethorpe Gilbert St Roberta Ave Curb Extension NE&NW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Okay, but what about drainage, street sweepers, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Pacific Dr Gage Ave Curb Extension NE&NW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Okay, this would take care of the space issues concern. ADA co Orangethorpe Pacific Dr Roberta Ave Curb Extension NE Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Okay, but how do we deal with the drainage, street sweeping, Orangethorpe Pacific Dr Woodcrest Ave Curb Extension SW & SE Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Okay, this would help with the space concern. Orangethorpe Baker Ave Courtney Ave Curb Ramp All Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Baker Ave Courtney Ave Detectable Warning Surface All Orangethorpe Baker Ave Naples Pl Curb Ramp NE&NW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Baker Ave Naples Pl Detectable Warning Surface NE&NW Orangethorpe Baker Ave Simi Pl Curb Ramp NE&NW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Basque Ave Maxzim Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Orangethorpe
Basque Ave Roberta Ave Curb Ramp NE&SE Okay, but why not bring the other side up to ADA compliance a Orangethorpe Gage Ave Courtney Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Orangethorpe Gage Ave Courtney Ave Detectable Warning Surface NW&SW Orangethorpe Houston Ave Courtney Ave Curb Ramp NE&NW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Orchard Ave Gage Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Orangethorpe
Orchard Ave Maxzim Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Orangethorpe Orchard Ave Roberta Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Maxzim Ave Curb Ramp SE&SW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Pine Dr Curb Ramp SE&SW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Roberta Ave/Page Ave Courtney Ave Curb Ramp NE&NW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Cedar Ave High Visibility Crosswalk W Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Cedar Ave Curb Ramp NW&SW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Cedar Ave Detectable Warning Surface NW&SW Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Courtney Ave Curb Ramp NE&SE&SW Okay, but what about drainage, street sweeping, trash trucks, Orangethorpe Basque Ave Roberta Ave Detectable Warning Surface NW&SW Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Pine Dr Detectable Warning Surface NW&SW Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Courtney Ave Detectable Warning Surface NE&SE&SW Orangethorpe Brookhurst Rd Roberta Ave/Page Ave Gateway Curb Extension NW&SW How do we do this with the gutter? What about street sweepi Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Courtney Ave Gateway Curb Extension SE&SW How will we design this with the gutters? Street sweepers, tra Orangethorpe Brookhurst Rd Roberta Ave/Page Ave Hardened Centerline N-S How do we do this without those glued down delineators? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Brookhurst Rd Hardened Centerline N-S How do we do this without those glued down delineators? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Euclid St Hardened Centerline N-S How do we do this without those glued down delineators? We Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Gilbert St Hardened Centerline E-W How do we do this without those glued down delineators? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Harbor Blvd Hardened Centerline E-W How do we do this without those glued down delineators? Orangethorpe Baker Ave Courtney Ave High Visibility Crosswalk W & E Lighting concerns. We'll need to discuss since this is a propose Orangethorpe Gage Ave Courtney Ave High Visibility Crosswalk W Lighting concerns Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Nicklett Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N ADA ramps, lighting, trucks, drainage, etc... Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Basque Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Cedar Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Courtney Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N I'm assuming this is from the north Orangethorpe frontage to OOrangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Eadington Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Orchard Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N&W Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Pacific Dr High Visibility Crosswalk N&W Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Richman Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N&W&E This is okay, but what about ADA compliance for the ramps? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Woods Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N&W&E Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Basque Ave High Visibility Crosswalk E Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Cedar Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S Is ths for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Courtney Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S Park, community center, and bus stops Across Orangethorpe (south frontage)? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Jefferson Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Orchard Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S&E Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Richman Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S&W This is okay, but what about ADA compliance for the ramps? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Woods Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S&W&E Is this for an E-W xing? Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Maxzim Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S We'll need to discuss this, if we're proposing new x-walks. Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Pine Dr High Visibility Crosswalk N&S We'll need to discuss this, if we're proposing new x-walks. Orangethorpe Roberta Ave/Page Ave Courtney Ave High Visibility Crosswalk N Lighting concerns. We'll need to discuss this. Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Courtney Ave High Visibility Crosswalk E&S Where will the E cross? There's driveways to the west. We'll n Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Eadington Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow S&E Will the pre-schools qualify for the yellow x-walk? Is this for an Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Houston Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow S Okay, but what about ADA compliance for the ramps? Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Locust Dr High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow S Okay, but what about ADA compliance for the ramps? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Gilbert St Left-turn Signal E-W Prot-Permissive Signal Are we going to see if this is warranted or just go w/ protective Orangethorpe Brookhurst Rd Houston Ave Path Lighting Solar? Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Courtney Ave Lighting NE Orangethorpe
PrimaryRd SecondaryRd Treatment Leg Notes Comments Project Brookhurst Rd Roberta Ave/Page Ave LPI All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Brookhurst Rd LPI All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Euclid St LPI N-S This should be taken care of during the Euclid St RTSSP project Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Gilbert St LPI All Okay Orangethorpe
Orangethorpe Ave Harbor Blvd LPI All We can take care of this during our Harbor Blvd RTSSP project Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Magnolia Ave LPI All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Pacific Dr LPI E Okay but do we need to look into ADA compliance for the ram Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Pomona Ave LPI All Okay Orangethorpe
Orangethorpe Ave Richman Ave LPI N-S Okay Orangethorpe
Baker Ave between Eadington Ave and Basque Ave Median Island Continue east of Basque? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Pacific Dr High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow E Orangethorpe Baker Ave between Pacific Dr and Eadington Ave Median Island What are you thinking for this? Orangethorpe Houston Ave between Eadington Ave and Basque Ave Median Island No median islands east of Basque? Orangethorpe Houston Ave between Pacific Dr and Eadington Ave Median Island What are you thinking for this? Orangethorpe Roberta Ave between Eadington Ave and Basque Ave Median Island What are you thinking for this? Orangethorpe Roberta Ave between Pacific Dr and Eadington Ave Median Island What are you thinking for this? Orangethorpe Gilbert St Roberta Ave Relocate Crosswalk N Suggested route to orangethorpe elementary Orangethorpe Brookhurst Rd Roberta Ave/Page Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Brookhurst Rd Retroreflective Backplate All HSIP Improvement Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Euclid St Retroreflective Backplate All HSIP Improvement Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Gilbert St Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Harbor Blvd Retroreflective Backplate All HSIP Improvement Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Highland Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Lemon St Retroreflective Backplate All Shared intersection with Anaheim, would need to coordinate Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Magnolia Ave Retroreflective Backplate All HSIP Improvement Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Pomona Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Richman Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave Woods Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Orangethorpe Pacific Dr Gage Ave RRFB E-W Space issues w/ push button. Orangethorpe Pacific Dr Woodcrest Ave RRFB E-W Ex. space is a concern to install everything. Pushbutton locatio Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Basque Ave Stop Here On Red Sign N Where do you want to install this? Will we get detection? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Pacific Dr Stop Here On Red Sign N How will we detect the cars? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Richman Ave Stop Here On Red Sign N This is okay if we can get the video detection working there. Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Woods Ave Stop Here On Red Sign N Where do you want to install this? Will we get detection? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Basque Ave Stop Here On Red Sign S Where do you want to install this? Will we get detection? Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Woods Ave Stop Here On Red Sign S Where do you want to install this? Will we get detection? Orangethorpe Baker Ave Courtney Ave Stop Sign & Marking W&E Only 1 of 4 legs? Confirm - You don't want to do E/W? Orangethorpe Baker Ave Naples Pl Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Baker Ave Simi Pl Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Basque Ave Gage Ave Stop Sign & Marking E&W Okay Orangethorpe Basque Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Basque Ave Maxzim Ave Stop Sign & Marking E&W Okay Orangethorpe Citrus Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Eadington Ave Gage Ave Stop Sign & Marking E&W Okay Orangethorpe Eadington Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Eadington Ave Maxzim Ave Stop Sign & Marking E&W Okay Orangethorpe Eadington Ave Woodcrest Ave Stop Sign & Marking E&W Okay Orangethorpe Gage Ave Courtney Ave Stop Sign & Marking W Okay Orangethorpe Houston Ave Courtney Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Lovering Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Orange Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Cedar Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Courtney Ave Stop Sign & Marking N I'm assuming this is just north of Orangethorpe (north frontageOrangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Eadington Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (North Frontage Rd) Orchard Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Cedar Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Eadington Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Jefferson Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Orangethorpe Orangethorpe Ave (South Frontage Rd) Orchard Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Orangethorpe Orchard Ave Gage Ave Stop Sign & Marking All way, E/W...? Orangethorpe Orchard Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Orchard Ave Woodcrest Ave Stop Sign & Marking All way, E/W....? Orangethorpe Roberta Ave Pine Dr Stop Sign & Marking N&S Did we check that it meets the warrants? Orangethorpe Roberta Ave/Page Ave Courtney Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe Royer Ave Houston Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Orangethorpe PrimaryRd SecondaryRd Treatment Leg Notes Comments Project Woodcrest Ave Cedar Ave Stop Sign & Marking W Okay Orangethorpe Woodcrest Ave Courtney Ave Stop Sign & Marking E Okay Orangethorpe Gilbert St Olive Ave Curb Extension SE&SW Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Drainage, trucks, etc... Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Academy Dr Curb Extension E Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Shared intersection with Buena Park Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Louise Pl Curb Extension E Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Lighting concerns, drainage concerns, trucks, etc... Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Valencia Dr Curb Extension N Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces included Aren't we already proposing a curb extension? Southwest Area Jensen Wy Ash Ave Curb Ramp NE&SE Okay Southwest Area
Jensen Wy West Ave Curb Ramp All Okay Southwest Area
Paula Ave Flower Ave Curb Ramp NE&NW Okay Southwest Area Paula Ave West Ave Curb Ramp SE&SE Okay Southwest Area
Pritchard Ave Ash Ave Curb Ramp All Okay, need to confirm space on SEC due to wall. Southwest Area Gilbert St Flower Ave Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE Lighting, trucks, drainage, etc... Southwest Area Gilbert St West Ave Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE Lighting, trucks, drainage, etc... Southwest Area Jensen Wy Valencia Dr Gateway Curb Extension SE&SW How will trucks make the turn? What about drainage, street sw Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Flower Ave Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE Okay, but what about drainage, trucks, etc... Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Louise Pl Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE How will trucks make the turn? What about drainage, street sw Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Olive Ave Gateway Curb Extension NE&SE Okay, but what about drainage, trucks, etc... Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Valencia Dr Gateway Curb Extension NE&NW Lighting concerns, drainage concerns, trucks, etc... Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Valencia Dr Gateway Curb Extension SE&SW Lighting concerns w/ RRFB, drainage concerns, trucks, etc... Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Jensen Wy High Visibility Crosswalk S I'm assuming E/W, lighting concerns... Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Vermont Ave High Visibility Crosswalk S I'm assuming E/W, lighting concerns... Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Louise Pl High Visibility Crosswalk E Lighting concerns Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Thompson Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow S Lighting concerns and the fire hydrant in the ramp on the east Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Academy Dr High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow W Shared intersection with Buena Park, west leg is in Buena Park Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Flower Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow E I'm assuming N/S x-walk, but I do have lighting concerns... Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Olive Ave High Visibility Crosswalk - Yellow E I'm assuming N/S x-walk, but I do have lighting concerns... Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Jensen Wy Lighting S Southwest Area
Commonwealth Ave Thompson Ave Lighting SW Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Vermont Ave Lighting S Southwest Area
Gilbert St Olive Ave Lighting SW We already upgraded this intersection... currently working on Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Pritchard Ave LPI All Okay Southwest Area Gilbert St Valencia Dr LPI All Okay Southwest Area
Magnolia Ave Valencia Dr LPI Okay Southwest Area
Flower Ave between Lindy Pl and Paula Ave Median Island What are you thinking for this? Will it be continuous... opening Southwest Area Flower Ave between Pritchard Ave and Lindy Pl Median Island What are you thinking for this? Will it be continuous... opening Southwest Area Olive Ave between Lindy Pl and Paula Dr Median Island What are you thinking for this? Will it be continuous... opening Southwest Area Olive Ave between Vine Ave and Lindy Pl Median Island What are you thinking for this? Will it be continuous... opening Southwest Area West Ave between Magnolia Ave and Pritchard Ave Median Island What are you thinking for this? Will it be continuous... opening Southwest Area West Ave between Pritchard Ave and Jensen Wy Median Island What are you thinking for this? Will it be continuous... opening Southwest Area Commonwealth Ave Pritchard Ave Retroreflective Backplate All Okay, lighting upgrades as well? Southwest Area Gilbert St Valencia Dr Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Southwest Area Magnolia Ave Valencia Dr Retroreflective Backplate All Okay Southwest Area Gilbert St Olive Ave RRFB S all-way stop warrant? Gilbert ADT significantly higher than OlivSouthwest Area Cherry Ave Crystal Pl Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Cherry Ave Hill Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay, can we also think about some centerline striping around Southwest Area Cherry Ave Margaret Pl Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Cherry Ave Nicklett Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Cherry Ave Paula Dr Stop Sign & Marking S Shouldn't it be the W leg? Southwest Area Flower Ave Lindy Pl Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Jensen Wy Ash Ave Stop Sign & Marking W Okay Southwest Area Olive Ave Lindy Pl Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Southwest Area Olive Ave Paula Dr Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Paula Ave Flower Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Okay Southwest Area Paula Ave West Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Ash Ave Stop Sign & Marking Okay Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Flower Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Isn't this an alley? Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Oak Ave Stop Sign & Marking N&S Okay Southwest Area Vine Ave Cherry Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Which leg? I'm assuming N? Southwest Area Vine Ave Flower Ave Stop Sign & Marking N&S Which legs? I'm assuming E/W? Southwest Area Vine Ave Hill Ave Stop Sign & Marking E Which leg? I'm assuming E? Southwest Area Vine Ave Oak Ave Stop Sign & Marking S Okay Southwest Area Vine Ave Olive Ave Stop Sign & Marking N&S Which legs? I'm assuming E/W? Southwest Area Vine Ave Porter Ave Stop Sign & Marking N Which leg? I'm assuming N? Southwest Area Pritchard Ave Creek Upgrade Ped/Bike Bridge What did you have in mind for this? Southwest Area Appendix C
CONCEPT
ENGINEERING DESIGNS
MAGNOLIA AVENUE
W OLIVE AVENUE
S VINE AVENUE
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
LEGEND
WEST OLIVE AVENUE BETWEEN MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND VINE AVENUE 1 11
SIGN LEGEND
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
S LINDY
PLACE
W OLIVE AVENUE
S GILBERT
STREET
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
LEGEND
SIGN LEGEND
WEST OLIVE AVENUE BETWEEN S LINDY PLACE AND GILBERT STREET 2 11
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
SIGN LEGEND
W VALENCIA DRIVE
S PRITCHARD
AVENUE
S PRITCHARD
AVENUE
MAGNOLIA
AVENUE
JENSEN WAY
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
·
·
LEGEND
WEST VALENCIA DRIVE BETWEEN SOUTH PRITCHARD AND JENSEN WAY 3 11
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
S ORCHARD
AVENUE
CITRUS
AVENUE
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
WEST HILL AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTH BASQUE AVENUE AND CITRUS AVENUE
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
W HILL AVENUE
S BASQUE AVENUE
4 11
SIGN LEGENDLEGEND
W HILL AVENUE
W HILL AVENUE
W SOUTHGATE AVENUE
S EUCLID
STREET
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
WEST HILL AVENUE BETWEEN CITRUS AVENUE AND EAST EUCLID STREET
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
5 11
PRIVATE
STREET
·
·
SIGN LEGENDLEGEND
BROOKHURST
ROAD
W ROBERTA AVENUE W PAGE AVE
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
WEST ROBERTA AVENUE BETWEEN COURTNEY AVENUE AND BROOKHURST ROAD
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
6 11
·
·
S COURTNEY
AVENUE
SIGN LEGENDLEGEND
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
WEST COMMONWEALTH AVENUE AND NORTH YALE AVENUE
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
W COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
S YALE
AVENUE
N YALE AVENUE
·
7 11
SIGN LEGENDLEGEND
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
EAST COMMONWEALTH AVENUE BETWEEN NORTH LILLIE AVENUE AND STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
E COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
N LILLIE
AVENUE
S LILLIE
AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
8 11
·
·
·
LEGEND
SIGN LEGEND
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
S PRITCHARD AVENUE BETWEEN LOUISE PLACE AND WEST COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
S PRITCHARD AVENUE
W COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
LOUISE
PLACE
9 11
·
FULLERTON
CREEK CHANNEL
·
·
LEGEND
SIGN LEGEND
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
YORBA LINDA BLVD BETWEEN STATE COLLEGE BLVD AND ALMIRA AVE
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
10 11
·
·
STATE
COLLEGE BOULEVARD
ALMIRA
AVENUEYORBA LINDA BOULEVARD
LEGEND
SIGN LEGEND
FULLERTON SS4A
PROPOSED TREATMENTS
C I T Y O F F U L L E R T O N
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD AT ASSOCIATED ROAD
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
11 11
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD
ASSOCIATED
ROADN CAMPUS DRIVE
·
·
LEGEND
SIGN LEGEND
Appendix D
NUTWOOD AVENUE
PROJECT
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD
TITAN DRIVE
FOLINO DRIVE
PLACENTIA AVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
HOPE INTERNATIONAL
UNIVERSITY (HIU)
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
SR-57 SB OFF RAMP
SR-57 SB ON RAMP
SR-57 NB ON RAMP
SR-57 NB OFF RAMP
COMMONWEALTH
AVENUE
57 CALIFORNIA
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
NUTWOOD AVENUE ATP IMPROVEMENTS
NORTH
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57 NB ON-RAMP TO PLACENTIA AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STA 10+00 TO 21+39.84
NOT TO SCALE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STA 21+39.84 TO 26+64.95
NOT TO SCALE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STA 26+64.95 TO 31+00
NOT TO SCALE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STA 31+00 TO 36+00
NOT TO SCALE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STA 36+00 TO 40+25
NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
NUTWOOD AVENUE ATP IMPROVEMENTS
” ”
”
”
S
S
S
S
S
S
CB
DD
CB
CB
CB D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
S
S
S
SS
S
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
S
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
CB
DD
CB
CB
CB D
D
D
D
D
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
NUTWOOD PARKING
STRUCTURE ACCESS
S
CB
D
DDDDD
D
MH
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
E
E
D
DDDDD
D
MH
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
E
E
S
CB
COMMONWEALTH
AVENUE
TITAN DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON (CSUF)
HOPE INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY (HIU)
LEGEND
NOTES
DEMOLITION NOTES
NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
DEMOLITION PLAN
SEE SHEET 4
MATCH LINE STA 28+50
MATCH LINE STA 18+50
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 18+50
D
D
D
D
D
S
SS
S
SS
S
T
E
D
D
D
D
S
SS
S
SS
S
T
E
D
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
SR-57 SBOFF RAMP
SR-57 SBON RAMP
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
S
SS
E
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
S
SS
E
PLACENTIAAVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57
SR-57 NBON RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
LEGEND
NOTES
DEMOLITION NOTES
NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 28+50
SEE SHEET 3
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
DEMOLITION PLAN
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
S
S
S
SS
S
T
S
S
S
S
S
S
CB
DD
CB
CB
CB D
D
D
D
D
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
NUTWOOD PARKING
STRUCTURE ACCESS
D
DDDDD
D
MH
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
E
E
S
CB
TITAN
DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON (CSUF)
HOPE INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY (HIU)
COMMONWEALTH
AVENUE
LEGEND
NOTE
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
MATCH LINE STA 18+50
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 18+50SEE SHEET 6
MATCH LINE STA 28+50
” ”
D
D
D
D
S
SS
S
SS
S
T
E
D
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
SR-57 SBOFF RAMP
SR-57 SBON RAMP
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
S
SS
E
PLACENTIAAVENUENUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57
SR-57 NBON RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
LEGEND
NOTE
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN
MATCH LINE STA 28+50
SEE SHEET 5
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
” ”
LEGEND
D
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
D
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
GENERAL NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #2
DETAIL #1
”
”
S
NUTWOOD AVENUE
NUTWOOD PARKINGSTRUCTURE ACCESS
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #3
”
”
NUTWOOD AVENUE
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #4
”
”
DDD
SS
NUTWOOD AVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #5
”
”
E
NUTWOOD AVENUE
TITAN DRIVE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTHCONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #6”
”
NUTWOOD AVENUE
COMMONWEALTH
AVENUE
S
NUTWOOD AVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #7
DETAIL #9
DETAIL #8
”
”
”
D
D
D
S
S
D
NUTWOOD AVENUE
FOLINO DRIVE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #10
”
”
T
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #11
”
”
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #12
DETAIL #14
DETAIL #13
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CURB RAMP DETAILS
DETAIL #15DETAIL #16
LEGEND
DD
SS
S
S
S
D
CB
ACCESS ROAD
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
BIKEWAY DETAILS
SECTION A-A
NTS
DETAIL #17
SECTION B-B
NTS
D
D
D
MH
S
S
SS
S
S
D
D
D
S
S SS
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
BIKEWAY DETAILS
SECTION C-C
NTS
DETAIL #18
DETAIL #19
SECTION D-D
NTS
”
TO BE COMPLETED
AT 90% SUBMITTAL
S
SR-57 SBON RAMP
SR-57 NBON RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57 SBOFF RAMP
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
BIKEWAY & MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
DETAIL #20
DETAIL B - CONCRETE MOW CURB
NTS
SECTION E-E
NTS
DETAIL A - REMOVABLE BOLLARD
NTS”
LEGEND
D
S
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
MEDIAN DETAILS
DETAIL #21
”
NUTWOOD AVENUE
S
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 17+25
MATCH LINE STA 17+25
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MEDIAN DETAILS
DETAIL #22
DETAIL #22
”
S
TITAN DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
S
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
SEE MIDDLE LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 22+50
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE STA 22+50
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 25+00
SEE MIDDLE RIGHT
MATCH LINE STA 25+00 MEDIAN DETAILS
DETAIL #23
DETAIL #23
DETAIL #23
”
D
S
E
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
MEDIAN DETAILS
DETAIL #24
”
E
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SS
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE STA 34+25
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 34+25
MEDIAN DETAILS
DETAIL #25
DETAIL #25
D
MH
S
S
E
NUTWOOD AVENUE
MH
S
NUTWOOD AVENUE
GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
MATCH LINE STA 43+50
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 43+50
MEDIAN DETAILS
DETAIL #26
DETAIL #26
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
ON-SITE DETAILS
DETAIL #27
”
”
”
DDD
S
S
S
S
S
S
ACCESS ROAD
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON (CSUF)
D
D
MH
S
S
S
S
S
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
ON-SITE DETAILS
TO BE COMPLETED
AT 90% SUBMITTAL
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANS
GENERAL SIGNING AND STRIPING NOTES
’
SIGNING AND STRIPING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
THRU
TRAFFIC
MERGE
LEFT ONLY
RIGHT LANE
TURNS RIGHT
AHEAD
PROPOSED SIGN LEGEND
PROPOSED BIKE LANE STRIPING DETAILS
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NUTWOOD AVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 18+50
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 18+50SEE SHEET
30 MATCH LINE STA 28+50
SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANS
TITAN
DRIVE
SIGNING AND STRIPING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
COMMONWEALTHAVENUE
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 28+50
SEE SHEET 29
SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANS
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57SB OFFRAMP
SR-57SB ONRAMPSR-57 NBON RAMP
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
NORTH
SR-57 NB
OFF RAMP
SIGNING AND STRIPING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
’
’
GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL NOTES: TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
”
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
QUADRANT
CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (THIS SHEET ONLY)
TITAN DRIVE
(25 MPH)
NUTWOOD AVENUE
(35 MPH)
PHASE DIAGRAM
POLE LOCATION
(NO SCALE)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
DETAIL "A"
(SCALE: 1"= 10')
LEGEND
D
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
NUTWOOD AVENUE
(35 MPH)
FOLINO DRIVE
(25 MPH)
PHASE DIAGRAM
CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
QUADRANT
POLE LOCATION
(NOT TO SCALE)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (THIS SHEET ONLY)
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
SR 57 SBOFF RAMP(50 MPH)
PHASE DIAGRAM
POLE LOCATION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
SR 57 SBON RAMP(65 MPH)
CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (THIS SHEET ONLY)
LEGEND
CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
QUADRANT
DETAIL "C"
(SCALE: 1"= 10')
DETAIL "D"
(SCALE: 1"= 10')
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
PHASE DIAGRAM
CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
QUADRANT
POLE LOCATION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN
NUTWOOD AVENUE
(35 MPH)
SR 57 NBOFF RAMP(50 MPH)
SR 57 NBON RAMP(65 MPH)
CONSTRUCTION NOTES: (THIS SHEET ONLY)
DETAIL "E"
(SCALE: 1"= 10')
NORTH
LEGEND
DETAIL "F"
(SCALE: 1"= 10')
”
S
S
S
SS
S
T
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
STREET LIGHTING PLANS
MATCH LINE STA 18+50
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 18+50SEE SHEET
37 MATCH LINE STA 28+50
NUTWOOD AVENUE
ACCESS ROAD
CIRCUIT DIAGRAM
NOT TO SCALE
STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
TITAN DRIVE
COMMON-
WEALTH
AVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD
TO BE COMPLETED
AT 90% SUBMITTAL
STREET LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
NUTWOOD AVENUE
S
S
S
S
SS
S
T
S
SS
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
FOLINO DRIVE
STREET LIGHTING PLANS
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
MATCH LINE STA 28+50
SEE SHEET
36 CIRCUIT DIAGRAM
NOT TO SCALE
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
SR-57SB OFFRAMP
SR-57SB ONRAMPSR-57 NBON RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LEGEND
STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
TO BE COMPLETED
AT 90% SUBMITTAL
STREET LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES
S
S
S
S
S
S
ACCESS ROAD
NUTWOOD AVENUE
NORTH
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND
BIKE PATH LIGHTING PLAN - OPTION 1
BIKE PATH LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES
BIKE PATH LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
S
S
S
S
S
S
ACCESS ROAD
NUTWOOD AVENUE
NORTH
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT SP
RL
RC
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
BIKE PATH LIGHTING PLAN - OPTION 2
BIKE PATH LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND
BIKE PATH LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
D
D
D
D
D
S
SS
S
SS
S
T
E
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
SR-57 SBOFF RAMP
SR-57 SBON RAMP
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
S
SS
E
PLACENTIAAVENUENUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57
SR-57 NBON RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
LEGEND
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT IT C
F
AT
OE RN
OVI LI
CALI F
ORP
SIGER
ET
S
RED
I
EENGNE
R
A
LE OISSF AN
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SR
SR
BC
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
10/26/2025
NORTH
WATER POLLUTION & EROSION CONTROL
SEE BELOW LEFT
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
MATCH LINE STA 37+00
SEE ABOVE RIGHT
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
S
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
S
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
TYPICAL SECTION
NO SCALE
NUTWOOD AVENUE ATP
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
INDEX TO PLANS
INDEX TO PLANS
GENERAL NOTES
LOAD & RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN
STAGED CONSTRUCTION NOTES
EXCAVATION BACKFILL
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
NORTH
∆
FOUNDATION PLAN
PLAN LEGEND
NOTES
UTILITY NOTES
NOTES
BASIS OF COORDINATES BENCHMARKS
D
D
D
MHSS
SS
E
SR 57
NUTWOOD AVE
TO ANAHEIM
TO BREA
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
RETAINING WALL TYPE 7 DETAIL 1
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
RMC
ACM
SRJ
11/05/2025
11/05/2025
11/14/2025
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING FIELD DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING OR FABRICATING ANY MATERIAL.
RETAINING WALL TYPE 7 DETAIL 2
NOTES:
1. THIS LOTB SHEET WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALTRANS SOIL AND ROCK LOGGING, CLASSIFICATION, AND
PRESENTATION MANUAL (2022).
2. SAMPLES OBTAINED WITH A CALIFORNIA DRIVE SAMPLER
(2.41 INCH I.D., 3-INCH O.D.) LINED WITH BRASS RINGS AND
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) SPLIT BARREL SAMPLER
(1.37-INCH I.D., 2-INCH O.D.) N=BLOW COUNT.
3. SAMPLERS ADVANCED WITH A CME AUTOMATIC HAMMER SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH 140-LB WEIGHT, 30-INCH FREE FALL DROP,
ANVIL AND DRILL RODS.
4. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
(ASTM D-2488) USED FOR SOIL CLASSIFICATION; AND SUGGESTED
METHODS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF ROCK MASSES, JOINTS
AND DISCONTINUITIES, AFTER CALTRANS SOIL AND ROCK LOGGING,
CLASSIFICATION, AND PRESENTATION MANUAL
(2022).
4811 Airport Plaza Drive, Suite 220
Long Beach, California 90815
562-426-3355
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
XXXXX
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NUTWOOD AVENUE ATP
ERS NAME
ERS NUMBER
PID
DIST-COUNTY-ROUTE-POST MILE
SIGN OFF DATE
DESIGN OVERSIGHT
RW NORTH/SOUTH
55EXXXX
12 2500 0108
12-ORA-57-PM 17.59
36+0037+0038+0039+0040+0041+00
180
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240ELEVATION (feet)
180
185
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
ALLUVIUM: (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; stiff; dark gray; slightly moist; fine to coarse SAND
FILL: (SP) POORLY GRADED SAND with GRAVEL; medium dense; brown; slightly moist; fine to coarse SAND
ASPHALT CONCRETE (8") over AGGREGATE BASE (8")
(SC) CLAYEY SAND; medium dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND (SM) SILTY SAND with CLAY; loose; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to medium SAND; little CLAY; few GRAVEL51.4
09-11-2025
Terminated at Elev 209.1
ER = 80.5%
222.6
361.4
252.6
131.4
A-25-003
ASPHALT CONCRETE (7") over AGGREGATE BASE (10")
(CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; hard; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; hard; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; calcite stringers
(SC) CLAYEY SAND; medium dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to medium SAND; iron oxide staining
(SM) SILTY SAND; loose; light reddish brown; slightly moist; find to medium SAND
FILL: (SM) SILTY SAND with GRAVEL; medium dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; little CLAY
ALLUVIUM: (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; stiff; dark gray; slightly moist; fine SAND; trace organics
(CL) SANDY LEAN CLAY; hard; reddish brown; slightly moist; find to medium SAND
(SP-SM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT; dense; tan; slightly moist; find to medium SAND
(CL) SANDY LEAN CLAY; very stiff; reddish brown; slightly moist; find to medium SAND
(SM) SILTY SAND with CLAY; dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; find to medium SAND; iron oxide staining; calcite stringers
09-12-2025
Terminated at Elev 184.1
ER = 80.5%
21 1.4
102.6
211.4
692.6
201.4
242.6
301.4
562.6
301.4
322.6
A-25-001
ALLUVIUM: (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; stiff; dark gray; slightly moist; fine to coarse SAND
(SM) SILTY SAND; medium dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; little CLAY; trace GRAVEL
ASPHALT CONCRETE (8") over AGGREGATE BASE (10")
(CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; very stiff; dark brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; calcite stringers; micaceous
FILL: (SM) SILTY SAND; medium dense; brown; slightly moist; fine to coarse SAND; less than 25% GRAVEL
(CL) SANDY LEAN CLAY; very stiff; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; calcite stringers
(CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; hard; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; calcite stringers
(SP-SM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT; loose; light reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to coarse SAND
(CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; very stiff; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND; calcite stringers
(SM) SILTY SAND with CLAY; dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND (SC) CLAYEY SAND; medium dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to medium SAND; calcite stringers
09-11-2025
Terminated at Elev 184.7
ER = 80.5%
211.4
102.6
211.4
102.6
211.4
102.6
211.4
102.6
211.4
102.6
A-25-002
ALLUVIUM: (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; stiff; light reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to medium SAND
(SP-SM) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT; medium dense; light reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to medium SAND
(SM) SILTY SAND with CLAY; dense; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; hard; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND FILL: (SC) CLAYEY SAND with GRAVEL; light reddish brown; slightly moist; fine to medium SAND
(CL) SANDY LEAN CLAY; medium stiff; light reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND
(ML) SANDY SILT; very stiff; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND (CL) LEAN CLAY with SAND; hard; reddish brown; slightly moist; fine SAND ASPHALT CONCRETE (9") over AGGREGATE BASE (8")
09-12-2025
Terminated at Elev 209.7
ER = 80.5%
71.4 512.6
141.4
422.6
311.4
A-25-004
ELEVATION (feet)
-- dense
-- medium dense
-- medium dense; calcite stringers
-- dense
-- hard
-- hard
-- hard
-- abundant calcite stringers; trace gravel
A-25-001
TD=51.5
13+70.58 END
N Ret WALL
55.44' Lt
"Nutwood" LINE
40+11.59
10+00.00 BEGIN
N Ret WALL
62.42' Lt "Nutwood" LINE
36+42.95
PI 10+30.21
A-25-004
TD=26.5
A-25-002
TD=51.5
A-25-003
TD=26.5
A-08-016
48 65
60% PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 11/26/2025
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION PSI
RAIN BIRD R-VAN-STRIP 1812-SAM-P45
SHRUB ROTARY, 5FT.X15FT. (LCS AND RCS), 5FT.X30FT.
(SST) HAND ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/ 1800
SHRUB SPRAY BODY ON 12IN. POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE
AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT
FEMALE THREADED INLET.
40 RAIN BIRD R-VAN14 1812-SAM-P45
SHRUB ROTARY, 8FT.-14FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360
DEGREES. HAND ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY
W/1800 SHRUB SPRAY BODY ON 12IN. POP-UP, WITH
CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE
REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET.
40 TORO 570S-500 FLOOD
ADJUSTABLE SHRUB FLOOD BUBBLER ON FIXED RISER.
1/2IN. FIPT THREADS. SERVICEABLE FILTER SCREEN AND
DURABLE CONSTRUCTION.
30 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT FOR COMMERCIAL
APPLICATIONS. 1IN. BALL VALVE WITH 1IN. PESB VALVE
AND 1IN. PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI QUICK-CHECK
BASKET FILTER. 5 GPM-20 GPM.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT
12" O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT.
SPECIFY XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1IN., 1-1/2IN., 2IN. PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE. LOW FLOW OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE
CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 44-RC
1IN. BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 2-PIECE BODY.
NIBCO T-113
CLASS 125 BRONZE GATE SHUT OFF VALVE WITH WHEEL
HANDLE, SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIPE DIAMETER AT
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4IN. - 3IN.
FEBCO 825Y 1"
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH CAGE
DIG CORPORATION LEIT 4004
FOUR STATIONS OPERATE WITH A MASTER VALVE OR
PUMP START. SELF-CONTAINED WATER MANAGEMENT
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER THAT HARNESSES SOLAR AS A
POWER SOURCE. SUSTAINABLE.
DIG CORPORATION LEIT 4006
SIX STATIONS OPERATE WITH A MASTER VALVE OR PUMP
START. SELF-CONTAINED WATER MANAGEMENT
IRRIGATION CONTROLLER THAT HARNESSES SOLAR AS A
POWER SOURCE. SUSTAINABLE.
WATER METER 1"
MEDIAN #4
SALVAGED AND REUSE (E) 1" METER
WATER METER 5/8"
MEDIAN #1 AND #2
RELOCATE EAST METER INTO NEW LANDSCAPE MEDIAN
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
PIPE SLEEVE: PVC CLASS 200
TYPICAL PIPE SLEEVE FOR IRRIGATION PIPE. PIPE SLEEVE
SIZE SHALL ALLOW FOR IRRIGATION PIPING AND THEIR
RELATED COUPLINGS TO EASILY SLIDE THROUGH
SLEEVING MATERIAL. EXTEND SLEEVES 18 INCHES
BEYOND EDGES OF PAVING OR CONSTRUCTION.
BF
C1
C2
M
M
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
P.O.C. NUMBER: 01
Water Source Information: Median #1 and #2
RELOCATE EAST METER INTO NEW LANDSCAPE MEDIAN
FLOW AVAILABLE
Water Meter Size: 5/8"
Flow Available 15 GPM
PRESSURE AVAILABLE
Static Pressure at POC: 70 PSI
Elevation Change: 0.00 ft
Service Line Size: 4"
Length of Service Line: 20 ft
Pressure Available: 70 PSI
DESIGN ANALYSIS
Maximum Station Flow: 10.95 GPM
Flow Available at POC: 15 GPM
Residual Flow Available: 4.05 GPM
Critical Station: 3
Design Pressure: 30 PSI
Friction Loss: 0.67 PSI
Fittings Loss: 0.07 PSI
Elevation Loss: 0 PSI
Loss through Valve: 13.9 PSI
Pressure Req. at Critical Station: 44.6 PSI
Loss for Fittings: 0.03 PSI
Loss for Main Line: 0.25 PSI
Loss for POC to Valve Elevation: 0 PSI
Loss for Backflow: 12.2 PSI
Loss for Water Meter: 4.37 PSI
Critical Station Pressure at POC: 61.5 PSI
Pressure Available: 70 PSI
Residual Pressure Available: 8.51 PSI
P.O.C. NUMBER: 02
Water Source Information: Median #4
SALVAGED AND REUSE (E) 1" METER
FLOW AVAILABLE
Water Meter Size: 1"
Flow Available 37.5 GPM
PRESSURE AVAILABLE
Static Pressure at POC: 70 PSI
Elevation Change: 0.00 ft
Service Line Size: 4"
Length of Service Line: 20 ft
Pressure Available: 70 PSI
DESIGN ANALYSIS
Maximum Station Flow: 33.6 GPM
Flow Available at POC: 37.5 GPM
Residual Flow Available: 3.9 GPM
Critical Station: 10
Design Pressure: 40 PSI
Friction Loss: 2.86 PSI
Fittings Loss: 0.29 PSI
Elevation Loss: 0 PSI
Loss through Valve: 2.8 PSI
Pressure Req. at Critical Station: 50.9 PSI
Loss for Fittings: 0.02 PSI
Loss for Main Line: 0.17 PSI
Loss for POC to Valve Elevation: 0 PSI
Loss for Backflow: 11.2 PSI
Loss for Water Meter: 2.02 PSI
Critical Station Pressure at POC: 64.4 PSI
Pressure Available: 70 PSI
Residual Pressure Available: 10.62 PSI
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
IRRIGATION NOTES, LEGEND,
AND CALCULATIONS
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
CB
D
D
S
SS
S
T
M
BF
1 7.97
1"
2 8.18
1"
C1
311.0
1"
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CSUF - LOT C WEST
UCA APARTMENT HOMES
NUTWOOD
PARKING
STRUCTURE
EXIT
NUTWOOD EAST
APARTMENTS
CSUF - LOT C EAST
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT FOR COMMERCIAL
APPLICATIONS. 1IN. BALL VALVE WITH 1IN. PESB VALVE
AND 1IN. PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI QUICK-CHECK
BASKET FILTER. 5 GPM-20 GPM.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT
12" O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT.
SPECIFY XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD 44-RC
1IN. BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 2-PIECE BODY.
NIBCO T-113
CLASS 125 BRONZE GATE SHUT OFF VALVE WITH WHEEL
HANDLE, SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIPE DIAMETER AT
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4IN. - 3IN.
FEBCO 825Y 1"
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH CAGE
WATER METER 5/8"
MEDIAN #1 AND #2
RELOCATE EAST METER INTO NEW LANDSCAPE MEDIAN
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
BF
M
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
SPECIFY XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 16+00
SEE SHEET
60 IRRIGATION PLAN
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
CB
DDD
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
4 10.6
1"
311.0
1"
TITAN DRIVE
ACCESS ROAD
NUTWOOD AVENUE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CSUF - LOT C EAST
INSTITUTE OF RELIGION - THE
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST
OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
CSUF - LOT C EAST
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT FOR COMMERCIAL
APPLICATIONS. 1IN. BALL VALVE WITH 1IN. PESB VALVE
AND 1IN. PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI QUICK-CHECK
BASKET FILTER. 5 GPM-20 GPM.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT
12" O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT.
SPECIFY XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD 44-RC
1IN. BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 2-PIECE BODY.
NIBCO T-113
CLASS 125 BRONZE GATE SHUT OFF VALVE WITH WHEEL
HANDLE, SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIPE DIAMETER AT
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4IN. - 3IN.
FEBCO 825Y 1"
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH CAGE
WATER METER 5/8"
MEDIAN #1 AND #2
RELOCATE EAST METER INTO NEW LANDSCAPE MEDIAN
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
BF
M
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
SPECIFY XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 16+00
SEE SHEET
59 MATCH LINE STA 21+50
SEE SHEET 61
IRRIGATION PLAN
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
S
D
DD
D
MH
S
S
S
S
E
BF
M
6 28.8
1"
77.32 1" 833.6
1"
9 18.6
1"
10 18.6
1"
C2
55.06 1"
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
HOPE INTERNATIONAL
UNIVERSITY (HIU)
COMMONWEALTH
AVENUE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION PSI
RAIN BIRD R-VAN-STRIP 1812-SAM-P45
SHRUB ROTARY, 5FT.X15FT. (LCS AND RCS), 5FT.X30FT.
(SST) HAND ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY W/ 1800
SHRUB SPRAY BODY ON 12IN. POP-UP, WITH CHECK VALVE
AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT
FEMALE THREADED INLET.
40 RAIN BIRD R-VAN14 1812-SAM-P45
SHRUB ROTARY, 8FT.-14FT. 45-270 DEGREES AND 360
DEGREES. HAND ADJUSTABLE MULTI-STREAM ROTARY
W/1800 SHRUB SPRAY BODY ON 12IN. POP-UP, WITH
CHECK VALVE AND 45 PSI IN-STEM PRESSURE
REGULATOR. 1/2IN. NPT FEMALE THREADED INLET.
40 TORO 570S-500 FLOOD
ADJUSTABLE SHRUB FLOOD BUBBLER ON FIXED RISER.
1/2IN. FIPT THREADS. SERVICEABLE FILTER SCREEN AND
DURABLE CONSTRUCTION.
30 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1IN., 1-1/2IN., 2IN. PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL REMOTE CONTROL
VALVE. LOW FLOW OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE
CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 44-RC
1IN. BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 2-PIECE BODY.
NIBCO T-113
CLASS 125 BRONZE GATE SHUT OFF VALVE WITH WHEEL
HANDLE, SAME SIZE AS MAINLINE PIPE DIAMETER AT
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4IN. - 3IN.
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
VALVE LOCATION. SIZE RANGE - 1/4IN. - 3IN.
FEBCO 825Y 1"
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITH CAGE
WATER METER 1"
MEDIAN #4
SALVAGED AND REUSE (E) 1" METER
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
BF
M
DURABLE CONSTRUCTION.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 21+50
SEE SHEET
60 MATCH LINE STA 28+00
SEE SHEET 62
NORTH
IRRIGATION PLAN
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
D
D
D
D
D
S
SS
S
S
T
EE
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
COLLEGE PARK
FULLERTON UNIVERSITY PLAZA
FULLERTON MARRIOTT AT
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 28+00
SEE SHEET 61
MATCH LINE STA 34+50
SEE SHEET 63
NORTH
IRRIGATION PLAN
EXISTING MEDIAN TO REMAIN -
PROTECT IN PLACE
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH, REPAIR, AND RELOCATE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM(S)
DAMAGED BY THIS WORK THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES
ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO REPAIR/REPLACE/ADJUST EXISTING IRRIGATION LIKE FOR LIKE AS NEEDED.
EXISTING IRRIGATION SCOPE
SSS
CALTRANS
R/W
SR-57 SBOFF RAMP
SR-57 SBON RAMP
SR-57
SR-57 NB ON
RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
NUTWOOD AVENUE
CALTRANS
R/W
SR-57
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
FULLERTON
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
FULLERTON
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 34+50
SEE SHEET 62
MATCH LINE STA 40+50
SEE SHEET
64 NORTH
IRRIGATION PLAN
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH, REPAIR, AND RELOCATE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM(S)
DAMAGED BY THIS WORK THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES
ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO REPAIR/REPLACE/ADJUST EXISTING IRRIGATION LIKE FOR LIKE AS NEEDED.
EXISTING IRRIGATION SCOPE
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
S
SS
E
PLACENTIA AVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57 NB ON
RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
CALTRANS
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
DENNY'S
MOONRAKER
APARTMENTS
WORLD OIL
CHEVRON
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
CALTRANS
R/W
FULLERTON
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
FULLERTON
R/W
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 40+50
SEE SHEET
63 NORTH
IRRIGATION PLAN
EXISTING BACKFLOW TO
REMAIN PROTECT-IN-PLACE
IRRIGATION NOTES
1. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO THESE PLANS AND SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO SECURE COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING PLANS AND ANIMALIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THEIR SCOPE.
3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SECURE ANY AND ALL PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THEIR SCOPE OF WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT THEIR ACTUAL LOCATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IN THE EVENT DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE PLANS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.
5. THE IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOWN HERE-IN IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY ONLY. ALL MAINLINE, SLEEVING, VALVES, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF WORK AND LOCATED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS WHERE EVER POSSIBLE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPROVEMENTS.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING LOTS, ETC.) INSIDE SLEEVING AS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL PER DETAILS PROVIDED. AT A MINIMUM, SLEEVES ARE TO BE 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE CARRIED. SLEEVES SHALL EXTEND 6" MIN.
PAST THE EDGE OF PAVED AREAS ABOVE.
7. IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN, AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE LEGEND.
CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO PERFORM MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FIELD TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF OVER-SPRAY ONTO ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. WHERE OCCURS, AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO REPLACE NOZZLES, SCREENS, ETC. WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS EQUIPMENT TO BETTER FIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
8. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE EXPECTED TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND STUB-OUT LOCATION
WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION TO THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
9. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM EXISTING SYSTEM SOURCE AND BACKFLOW ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL.
10. CAP EXISTING LINES WHERE NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION.
11. EXISTING MAINLINE APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXACT LOCATION AND UTILIZE. PROTECT EXISTING MAINLINE IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CAP EXISTING MAINLINE AND LEAVE IN PLACE WHERE NECESSARY.
12. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER EXISTING TREES. HAND TRENCH LATERALLY TO INSTALL HEADS, DRIP, ETC.
13. ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SHOWN TO REMAIN SHOULD BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM100 PERCENT COVERAGE ON EXISTING AND MODIFY IF NEEDED.
14. MODIFY ZONES PER REVISED CHANGES. CAP LINES WHERE NECESSARY. ADD HEADS AS NEEDED, REPLACE HEADS/NOZZLES TO PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE.
15. DO NOT REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVED LINES UNDER PAVEMENT UNLESS SPECIFIED.
16. CONTRACTOR TO NUMBER EXISTING VALVES AND PROPOSED VALVES IN NUMERICAL ORDER STARTING FROM THE METER AND GOING IN A CLOCKWISE CIRCLE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH, REPAIR, AND RELOCATE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM(S)
DAMAGED BY THIS WORK THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES
ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO REPAIR/REPLACE/ADJUST EXISTING IRRIGATION LIKE FOR LIKE AS NEEDED.
EXISTING IRRIGATION SCOPE
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
IRRIGATION DETAILS
C
F
B
D
DRIP TUBING CONNECTION
LEGEND
PRESSURE-COMPENSATING IN-LINE EMITTER TUBING PER
LEGEND
EMITTER PRE-INSTALLED IN TUBING
PLANT MATERIAL - SEE PLANS FOR SPACING
LOCKING INSERT FITTING
SPACING PER LEGEND
1 2
3 4
5 SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
2 1
3 4
1 2
5 5
DRIP TUBING LAYOUT
LEGEND
FLUSH VALVE PLUMBED TO PVC OR POLY EXHAUST MANIFOLD
PVC OR POLY EXHAUST MANIFOLD
PERIMETER LATERALS 2" TO 4" MIN., 1
2 LATERAL SPACING MAX
FROM EDGE
BLANK TUBING MANIFOLD FOR AIR VAC RELIEF (CENTERED ON
MOUND OR BERM)
AIR/VACUUM RELIEF VALVE (INSTALL AT HIGHEST LOCAL
ELEVATION)
AREA PERIMETER/EDGE OF PLANTER
DRIP TUBING LATERAL LINE
SECURE SIP LINES WITH JUTE NET STAPLED, OR EQUAL 5" O.C.
PVC OR POLY SUPPLY MANIFOLD
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE WITH DISC, FILTER AND PRV
START CONNECTION AS APPROPRIATE (SEE OTHER DETAILS)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 NOTES
A. DRIP LINES TO BE EQUALLY AND UNIFORMLY SPACED FOR
ENTIRE LENGTH OR RUN
B. SPACE LINES AS SHOWN AND/OR NOTED ON DRAWINGS AND
SPECS
C. SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
D. DRIP LINES TO BE LAID FLAT AND SECURED TO SUBGRADE
WITH STAPLES AT 5' CENTERS PRIOR TO BACKFILL
E.
USE CAUTION WHEN SECURING DRIP LINE WITH STAPLES.
DRIP LINE SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED, KINKED, OR
PUNCTURED.
F. DRIP LINE TO BE EQUALLY SPACED THROUGHOUT. SEE
NOTES AND LEGEND FOR SPACING.
N.T.S.
A
F
2 1
4 5
8 3 6
11 9
7 10
LEGEND
30" LENGTH OF COILED WIRE
WATER PROOF CONNECTOR- REFER TO IRRIGATION
SPECIFICATIONS
ID TAG- REFER TO IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS
RECTANGULAR, CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER-
LID SHALL BE HEAT BRANDED WITH LETTERS "RVC" AND
STATION NUMBER- REFER TO IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS.
FINISH GRADE. - 1" IN TURF AREAS.- 2" IN SHRUB AREAS
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE FILTER AND PRV - REFER TO
IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS
SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE (CLOSE)
SCH. 40 PVC ELL
SH. 80 PVC NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRE)
BICK (1 OF 4)
SCH. 80 OVC NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND SCH. 40 PVC ELL
PVC MAINLINE PIPE
SCH. 40 PVC TEE OR ELL
SCH. 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER
PVC LATERAL PIPE
(3) CUBIC FEET, MIN OF 3
4" MINUS WASHED GRAVEL
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
NOTES
A. ALL THREADS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH TEFLON TAPE
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
3" MIN.
REMOTE CONTOL DRIP VALVE
6 5
3 1
2 4
16 15
14 12
10 9
8 7
13 11
3" MIN.
GATE VALVE
LEGEND
FINISH GADE
- 1" IN TURF AREAS
- 2" IN SHRUB AREAS
ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER SHALL BE
BRANDED "GV" - REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND
6" DIAMETER PVC PIPE EXTENSION - LENGTH AS
REQUIRED
GATE VALVE - REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR SPECS
PVC MAINLINE - REFER TO IRRIGATION LEGEND
PVC MALE ADAPTER - TWO (2) REQUIRED
PEA GRAVEL - TWO (2) CUBIC FEET AT BASE OF VALVE
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 NOTES
A. ALL THREADS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH TEFLON TAPE
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
2'-0"
2" MIN.
1 2
7 3
4 5
6 POP-UP ROTARY HEAD
LEGEND
INSTALL POP-UP HEAD - SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR
SPECIFICATION
FINISH GRADE - SET 1" BELOW TOP OF HEAD TYP.
UNDISTURBED SOIL
TRIPLE SWING JOINT ASSEMBLY
SCH 40 PVC SxSxT TEE FITTING LATERAL X SPRINKLER
INLET SIZE
LATERAL LINE, SEE LENGEND AND DETAILS FOR TYPE
AND DEPTH REQUIRED
1 2
3 4
5 6
NOTES
A. INSTALL SPRINKLER HEADS 8" FROM PAVING EDGE IN SHRUB AND
GROUNDCOVER AREAS
B. INSTALL SPRINKLER HEADS 4" FROM PAVING EDGE IN TURF AREAS C. ADJUST SPRAYS OR NOZZLE STREAM SO THERE IS NO OVERSPRAY
ONTO ADJACENT HARDSCAPE AND/OR BUILDINGS
D. ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS SHALL HAVE TEFLON TAPE OR PASTE SCALE: N.T.S.
2 1
4 3
6 5
A
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
LEGEND
30" LENGTH OF WIRE, COILED.
WATERPROOF CONNECTIONS, TYP.
VALVE ID TAG, TYP.
VALVE BOX W/ LOCKING COVER (SIZE AS REQ'D.)
FINISH GRADE - 1" IN LAWN AREAS / 2" IN SHRUB
AREAS
REMOTE CONTROL VALVE PER LEGEND
PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (CLOSE)
PVC SCH. 40 ELL
PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQ'D.)
BRICK SUPPORT (4 TOTAL)
SCH. 80 NIPPLE (2" LENGTH, HIDDEN) AND
SCH. 40 ELL
PVC MAINLINE PER PLAN AND LEGEND
PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL
PVC SCH 40 MALE ADAPTER
PVC LATERAL PIPE
3" MIN. DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
NOTES
A. ALL THREADS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH TEFLON TAPE.
B. CONCRETE VALVE BOX SHALL BE PLACED 12" MIN. FROM ANY ADJACENT HARDSCAPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
10 15
16 12
11 13
14 7
8 9
3 2
1 4
6 5
E
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
A
QUICK COUPLER
LEGEND
GREEN PLASTIC, 10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH BOLT
DOWN COVER, HEAT BRANDED "QCV"
ID TAG
QUICK COUPLER VALVE - REFER TO IRRIGATION
LEGEND
FINISH GRADE:
- 1" BELOW BOX LID IN TURF AREAS
- 2" BELOW BOX LID IN SHRUB / GC AREAS
ONE (1) CU. FT. (MIN.) OF 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK AT BASE
OF VALVE BOX
SUPPORT - COMMON RED BRICK (4 TOTAL)
V.I.T. STAINLESS STEEL TIES - TYPICAL
SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED
1" DIAMETER SCH. 80 PVC SWING JOINT -
PREASSEMBLED BY SPEARS
PVC MAINLINE
1/2" DIA. X 24" LENGTH GALVANIZED PIPE STAKE
SCH. 80 PVC TEE FITTING
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
NOTES
A. ALL THREADS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH TEFLON TAPE
B.
12" MIN. CLEAR SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE
QUICK COUPLER VALVE BOX AND ANY ADJACENT HARDSCAPE
- WHERE OCCURS
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
7 6
5 9
8 11
10 4
12 3
2 1
6" MIN.
3"
IRRIGATION DETAILS
TREE ROOT WATERING SYSTEM - BUBBLERS
LEGEND
IRRIGATION HEAD, REFER TO LEGEND
PAVING EDGE, HEADER OR WALL
SWING JOINT - 18" MIN FOR 12" POPUPS & 12" MIN. FOR 6" POPUPS
PVC ELBOW OR TEE
TREE PER PLAN
1 2
3 4
5 NOTES
A. ALL THREREADS SHALLBE WRAPPED WITH TEFLON TAPE
B. EQUALLY SPACE (2) POP-UP HEADS PER TREE
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
4 2" IN TURF
4" IN SHRUB
1" IN SHRUBS
1/2" IN TURF
5 3
1 2
4 * ALL PVC SHALL BE PURPLE PIPE APPROVED FOR NON-POTABLE USES.
B
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. HEIGHT/SPREAD CAL. WUCOLS TREES
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. - - - -
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA
CRAPE MYRTLE 24" BOX 5`-6` HT. X 4`-5` SPR. L
QUERCUS ENGELMANNII
ENGELMANN OAK 24" BOX 9-10` HT. X 4-5` SPR, VL
TABEBUIA IMPETIGINOSA
PINK TRUMPET TREE 24" BOX 9-10` HT. X 4-5` SPR, M
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD SHRUBS
BULBINE FRUTESCENS 'TINY TANGERINE'
TINY TANGERINE BULBINE 5 GAL. 72" O.C. L 1'-2' HT. X 2'-3' SPR.
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
RED YUCCA 5 GAL. 60" O.C. VL 2`-3` HT. X 3`-5` SPR.
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE'
BREEZE™ MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR.
LOMANDRA X 'PLATINUM BEAUTY'
VARIEGATED DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR.
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD
GROUND COVERS
ROCK COBBLE
TO MATCH EXISTING -
PLANT LEGEND
QTY
5 2
10 8
QTY
61 101
145
209
QTY
618 SF
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLANTING LEGEND AND
SPECIFICATIONS
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SITE SPECIFIC HORTICULTURAL SOILS REPORT. THIS REPORT IS TO BE PREPARED BY A CITY APPROVED AGRONOMIST.
CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT THIS SITE SPECIFIC HORTICULTURAL SOILS REPORT TO THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 30 DAYS PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION.
1. SOIL PREPARATION AMENDMENTS
2. TREE AND SHRUB BACKFILL AMENDMENTS
3. POST PLANTING MAINTENANCE FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS
4. INFILTRATION RATE/PERCOLATION RATE
AGRONOMIST OR COMPETENT INDIVIDUAL TO EVALUATE VARIOUS SOIL TYPES, TEXTURES, COLORS, ETC. AND SAMPLE THE SITE ACCORDINGLY. CONTRACTOR TO IDENTIFY/MARK SAMPLE LOCATIONS ON A REDUCED SITE PLAN TO BE ATTACHED TO THE REPORT AND AT A MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES ARE RECOMMENDED:
1. PROJECT ENTRY LOCATION - 1 SAMPLE EACH
2. MEDIAN ISLAND - 2 SAMPLES EACH
BACK FILL SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL INCLUDING ORCHARD AND VINEYARDS (RATE PER CUBIC YARD OF MIX):
1. 20% PER CUBIC YARD OF ORGANIC AMENDMENT COMPRISED OF RECYCLED/LANDSCAPE WASTE (NO ANIMAL WASTE)
2. SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER TABLETS IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES OF BACK FILL.
FOR BIDDING PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL HORTICULTURAL SOILS TEST RESULTS AND REPORT (RATE PER 1,000 SF) - USE AS FOLLOWS:
1. 4 YARDS PER THOUSAND ORGANIC AMENDMENT COMPRISED OF RECYCLED/LANDSCAPE WASTE
2. 20 LBS SOIL SULPHUR
3. 10 LBS GYPSUM
4. 20 LBS 16-16-16 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
HORTICULTURAL SOILS TESTING/AMENDMENTS:I. CONTRACTOR'S LANDSCAPE WORK RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. SCOPE OF WORK: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TRANSPORTATION AND
SERVICES NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PLANTING ELEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIED HEREIN.
2. CONFORMANCE: ALL PLANTING WORK SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE LOCAL, COUNTY AND/OR STATE CODES, REGULATIONS AND RULES.
3. LICENSE: ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A C-27 CALIFORNIA LICENSED CONTRACTOR.
4. INSURANCE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CARRY ALL WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, PUBLIC LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE AS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS.
5. SITE VERIFICATION: PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY, AT THE
SITE, ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AFFECTING THE INTENDED DESIGN OF THE LANDSCAPE WORK. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY.
6. LIABLE FOR ENCROACHMENT: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ENCROACHMENT
ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY, RIGHT -OF-WAYS, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS OR ANY OTHER LEGAL PROPERTY RESTRICTION EITHER MARKED OR UNMARKED.
7. COORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF REQUIRED ACTIVITIES WITH ALL OTHER TRADES THROUGH THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
8. FIELD STAKING: PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE BY STAKES, OR OTHER
MEANS, ALL CONTAINER TREES, SHRUBS AND VINE LOCATIONS AND HEADER BOARD/MOW CURB LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
9. NOTIFICATION OF DISCREPANCIES: ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND/OR THE DESIGN INTENT AFFECTING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION AND
COST OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. ALL WORK RELATED TO THE PROBLEM AREA SHALL CEASE
UNTIL THE DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING. ANY CONTINUATION OF WORK IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND EXPENSE.
10. LIABLE FOR DAMAGE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES,
CONSTRUCTION, IRRIGATION AND PLANTING ELEMENTS, EXISTING OR NEW, MARKED OR UNMARKED,
AND SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY DAMAGED IMPROVEMENTS IN MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
11. LIABLE FOR LOSS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS TO
EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND MATERIALS ON THIS PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB IN WRITING FROM THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
12. WRITTEN GUARANTEE: ALL WORK SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS TO MATERIAL AND
WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN GUARANTEE ON HIS LETTERHEAD AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL INSPECTION.
13. STATE CIVIL CODE TITLE 7: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS PROJECT IS GOVERNED BY TITLE 7 OF THE
STATE CIVIL CODE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY REQUIREMENT OF TITLE 7 OF THE CIVIL CODE.
II. GENERAL PLANTING NOTES:
1. SITE PREPARATION: PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ROCKS, WEEDS, DEBRIS, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL FROM THE JOB SITE AND DISPOSE OF IT OFF-SITE IN A SUITABLE AND LAWFUL MANNER.
2. PLANTING AREAS: UPON COMPLETION OF ALL IRRIGATION WORK, ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH A SYSTEMIC HERBICIDE; CLEARED AND GRUBBED OF SURFACE WEED GROWTH; AND SHALL BE WEED FREE PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY PLANTING WORK.
3. FINISH GRADE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH FINISH GRADE A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES (6") BELOW THE FINISH FLOOR OF BUILDINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SMOOTH EVEN FINISH GRADES AT BUILDINGS, WALKS, OTHER PERMANENT OBJECTS AND LIMITS OF WORK. ALL CHANGES IN GRADE SHALL BE BLENDED UNIFORM VERTICAL CURVES. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED IN
TURF SHALL BE SMOOTHED WITH RAKES AND FLOATS TO THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SATISFACTION. OBJECTS SUCH AS ROCKS, DEBRIS, CLODS OR OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCK-PILED AND REMOVED.
4. DRAINAGE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS AT A MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT.
5. IMPORT SOIL: ON-SITE SOIL SHALL BE USED FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. WHEN ON-SITE SOIL IS NOT AVAILABLE, IMPORT SOIL SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:
A. SILT PLUS CLAY CONTENT OF THE IMPORT SOIL SHALL NOT EXCEED 20% BY WEIGHT WITH A MINIMUM 95% PASSING THE 2.0 MM. SIEVE. THE SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO (SAR) SHALL NOT EXCEED 6.0 MM. AND THE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY (ECE) OF THE SATURATION EXTRACT OF THIS SOIL SHALL NOT EXCEED 3.0 MMHOS./CM AT 250C. THE BORON CONTENT OF THIS SOIL SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 1 PPM AS MEASURED ON THE SATURATION EXTRACT. IN ORDER TO
INSURE CONFORMANCE, SAMPLES OF THE IMPORT SOIL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SOIL LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS PRIOR TO IMPORT ON SITE.
6. PLANT MATERIAL: ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF A SIZE, CHARACTER AND QUALITY WHICH MEETS
THE ACCEPTED INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR THAT PLANT AND BE FREE FROM INSECTS, THEIR EGGS, DISEASE, WEEDS, OR OTHER DETRIMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS.
7. HANDLING/STORAGE: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE HANDLED AND STORED SO THEY ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM DRYING OUT, SUN, WINDBURN, VANDALISM OR ANY OTHER INJURY. FOR
REJECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL, THE CITY'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REJECT ANY AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL REGARDED AS UNSUITABLE AT ANY TIME.
SUCH PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE IMMEDIATELY AND BE REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
9. PLANTING: ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED AND PLANTED AS DETAILED AND NOTED HEREIN.
III. EXISTING TREE PROTECTION NOTES:
1. THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ) SHALL ENCOMPASS THE TREE CANOPY DRIP LINE OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ARBORIST.
2. PROVIDE APPROVED MULCH TO THE ENTIRE AREA WITHIN THE TPZ. DURING CONSTRUCTION, MAINTAIN A 4"-6" LAYER OF MULCH OVER THE SOIL SURFACE TO HELP REDUCE SOIL COMPACTION, IMPROVE AERATION, ENHANCE MOISTURE RETENTION AND REDUCE TEMPERATURE EXTREMES.
3. PROVIDE TEMPORARY FENCING ALONG THE TPZ WITH A 6'-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH GREEN SCREEN FABRIC. PROVIDE SIGNAGE ON FENCE STATING: "TREE PROTECTION ZONE - KEEP OUT".
4. IF TRENCHING BECOMES NECESSARY WITHIN THE TPZ, ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE HAND DUG TO NOT DAMAGE ROOT ZONE. NO ROOTS LARGER THAN 2" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE CUT UNLESS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS FEASIBLE. ALL SMALLER ROOTS THAT REQUIRE CUTTING SHALL BE CUT WITH PRUNING SAWS AND CUTS SHALL BE MADE FLUSH WITH THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH. IF AT ANY TIME 25%
OF THE AREA WITHIN THE TPZ IS BEING SEPARATED FROM THE TREE BY THE LARGER TRENCH, THEN
THE LINE SHALL BE DETERMINED TO EITHER RELOCATE IT OR FOR IT TO BE INSTALLED BY BORING AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ARBORIST.
5. REMOVAL OF HARDSCAPE AND/OR EXCAVATION WITHIN THE TPZ SHALL BE DONE MANUALLY. NO EXCAVATION TYPE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR THIS WORK.
6. THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN AN OPEN TRENCH AND ANY TREE SHALL BE BETWEEN 6" TO 1'-0" FOR EVERY INCH OF TRUNK DIAMETER MEASURED AT 4'-6" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE AND IS DEPENDING ON THE SPECIES OF TREE. REFER TO ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS. MINIMUM CLEARANCE SHALL BE 10'-0" FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE.
7. IN THE EVENT ROOT PRUNING IS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE GRADE CHANGES OR INSTALLATION OF
HARDSCAPE FEATURES, THE ROOT PRUNING PROCEDURES SHALL BE DIRECTED BY THE CITY ARBORIST AS MENTIONED ABOVE.
8. AT NO TIME SHALL ANY EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, SUPPLIES OR FILL SOIL BE ALLOWED TO BE STAGED WITHIN THE TPZ UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER.
9. AS RECOMMENDED, PRUNE AND FERTILIZE THE EXISTING TREES AFTER THE COMPLETION OF ALL
EXTERIOR SITE WORK ON BUILDING/ STRUCTURES PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS.
CB
D
D
S
SS
S
T
NUTWOOD AVENUE
STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CSUF - LOT C WEST
UCA APARTMENT HOMES
NUTWOOD
PARKING
STRUCTURE
EXIT
NUTWOOD EAST
APARTMENTS
CSUF - LOT C EAST
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD QTY SHRUBS
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE'
BREEZE™ MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR. 19
LOMANDRA X 'PLATINUM BEAUTY'
VARIEGATED DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR. 53
PLANT LEGEND
DESCRIPTION MATERIAL / MODEL NO. COLOR / FINISH / PATTERN MANUFACTURER/ SUPPLIER REQUIRED SAMPLE/MOCKUP REMARKS / COMMENTS 4" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE
BOMANITE 12"x12" TILE PATTERN FRANCISCAN RED COLOR BOMANITE SHOP PROVIDE 3'X3' MOCK UP FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY CITY'S AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE
HARDSCAPE LEGEND
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 16+00
SEE SHEET
60 PLANTING PLAN
1. REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL PREP, FERTILIZING, BACKFILL, PLANT SELECTION, WARRANTY'S, ETC.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. ANY PLANT MATERIAL FOUND AT THE SITE EXHIBITING SIGNS OF PESTS AND/OR DISEASE WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. ONCE ROUGH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AND HAVE AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTS CONDUCTED. TESTS SHALL REVIEW SOIL FERTILITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL PREPERATION PRIOT TO PLANTING. SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN SOILS REPORT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE APPROVED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 3" DARK, HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. CITY MAINTAINED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE GORILLA HAIR MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ON CSUF CAMPUS SHALL RECEIVE TLC BROWN BARK CHIP OR APPROVED EQUAL.
SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. NO SHREDDED MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED.
6. WHERE ANY TREE IS LOCATED WITHIN SIX FEET OF ANY PAVING SURFACE IN ANY DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROOT BARRIER TEN FEET IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE, ALL SIDES OF THE TREE AS REQUIRED. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE 24" PANELS BY DEEP ROOT CORP. OR APPROVED EQUAL., MODEL UB-24-2, ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS PER THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, 2% MIN.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WOULD MAKE THE PROPOSED DESIGN UNACHIEVABLE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY IF ANY SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES COULD RESULT IN THE REJECTION AND REMOVAL OF FINISHED WORK AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES:
CB
DDD
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
TITAN DRIVE
ACCESS ROAD
NUTWOOD AVENUE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
CSUF - LOT C EAST
INSTITUTE OF RELIGION - THE
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST
OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
CSUF - LOT C EAST
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD QTY SHRUBS
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE'
BREEZE™ MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR. 24
LOMANDRA X 'PLATINUM BEAUTY'
VARIEGATED DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR. 29
PLANT LEGEND
DESCRIPTION MATERIAL / MODEL NO. COLOR / FINISH / PATTERN MANUFACTURER/ SUPPLIER REQUIRED SAMPLE/MOCKUP REMARKS / COMMENTS 4" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE
BOMANITE 12"x12" TILE PATTERN FRANCISCAN RED COLOR BOMANITE SHOP PROVIDE 3'X3' MOCK UP FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY CITY'S AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE
HARDSCAPE LEGEND
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NORTH
MATCH LINE STA 16+00
SEE SHEET
59 MATCH LINE STA 21+50
SEE SHEET 61
PLANTING PLAN
1. REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL PREP, FERTILIZING, BACKFILL, PLANT SELECTION, WARRANTY'S, ETC.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. ANY PLANT MATERIAL FOUND AT THE SITE EXHIBITING SIGNS OF PESTS AND/OR DISEASE WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. ONCE ROUGH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AND HAVE AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTS CONDUCTED. TESTS SHALL REVIEW SOIL FERTILITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL PREPERATION PRIOT TO PLANTING. SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN SOILS REPORT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE APPROVED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 3" DARK, HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. CITY MAINTAINED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE GORILLA HAIR MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ON CSUF CAMPUS SHALL RECEIVE TLC BROWN BARK CHIP OR APPROVED EQUAL.
SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. NO SHREDDED MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED.
6. WHERE ANY TREE IS LOCATED WITHIN SIX FEET OF ANY PAVING SURFACE IN ANY DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROOT BARRIER TEN FEET IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE, ALL SIDES OF THE TREE AS REQUIRED. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE 24" PANELS BY DEEP ROOT CORP. OR APPROVED EQUAL., MODEL UB-24-2, ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS PER THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, 2% MIN.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WOULD MAKE THE PROPOSED DESIGN UNACHIEVABLE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY IF ANY SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES COULD RESULT IN THE REJECTION AND REMOVAL OF FINISHED WORK AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES:
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING MULCH AREAS DAMAGED BY THIS WORK
THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING MULCH AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF
WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PATCH/REPAIR/REPLACE EXISTING
MULCH AREAS AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE THROUGHOUT AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
EXISTING LANDSCAPE SCOPE
S
D
DD
D
MH
S
S
S
S
E
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
HOPE INTERNATIONAL
UNIVERSITY (HIU)
COMMONWEALTH
AVENUE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. HEIGHT/SPREAD CAL. WUCOLS QTY TREES
QUERCUS ENGELMANNII
ENGELMANN OAK 24" BOX 9-10` HT. X 4-5` SPR, VL 5
TABEBUIA IMPETIGINOSA
PINK TRUMPET TREE 24" BOX 9-10` HT. X 4-5` SPR, M 8
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD QTY SHRUBS
BULBINE FRUTESCENS 'TINY
TANGERINE'
TINY TANGERINE BULBINE
5 GAL. 72" O.C. L 1'-2' HT. X 2'-3' SPR. 12
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
RED YUCCA 5 GAL. 60" O.C. VL 2`-3` HT. X 3`-5` SPR. 55
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE'
BREEZE™ MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR. 63
LOMANDRA X 'PLATINUM BEAUTY'
VARIEGATED DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR. 63
PLANT LEGEND
DESCRIPTION MATERIAL / MODEL NO. COLOR / FINISH / PATTERN MANUFACTURER/ SUPPLIER REQUIRED SAMPLE/MOCKUP REMARKS / COMMENTS 4" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE
BOMANITE 12"x12" TILE PATTERN FRANCISCAN RED COLOR BOMANITE SHOP PROVIDE 3'X3' MOCK UP FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY CITY'S AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE
HARDSCAPE LEGEND
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 21+50
SEE SHEET
60 MATCH LINE STA 28+00
SEE SHEET 62
NORTH
PLANTING PLAN
1. REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL PREP, FERTILIZING, BACKFILL, PLANT SELECTION, WARRANTY'S, ETC.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. ANY PLANT MATERIAL FOUND AT THE SITE EXHIBITING SIGNS OF PESTS AND/OR DISEASE WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. ONCE ROUGH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AND HAVE AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTS CONDUCTED. TESTS SHALL REVIEW SOIL FERTILITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL PREPERATION PRIOT TO PLANTING. SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN SOILS REPORT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE APPROVED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 3" DARK, HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. CITY MAINTAINED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE GORILLA HAIR MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ON CSUF CAMPUS SHALL RECEIVE TLC BROWN BARK CHIP OR APPROVED EQUAL.
SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. NO SHREDDED MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED.
6. WHERE ANY TREE IS LOCATED WITHIN SIX FEET OF ANY PAVING SURFACE IN ANY DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROOT BARRIER TEN FEET IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE, ALL SIDES OF THE TREE AS REQUIRED. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE 24" PANELS BY DEEP ROOT CORP. OR APPROVED EQUAL., MODEL UB-24-2, ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS PER THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, 2% MIN.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WOULD MAKE THE PROPOSED DESIGN UNACHIEVABLE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY IF ANY SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES COULD RESULT IN THE REJECTION AND REMOVAL OF FINISHED WORK AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES:
D
D
D
D
D
S
SS
S
S
T
EE
FOLINO DRIVE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
LANGSDORF
DRIVE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
COLLEGE PARK
FULLERTON UNIVERSITY PLAZA
FULLERTON MARRIOTT AT
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
CAL STATE UNIVERSITY,
FULLERTON (CSUF)
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
QTY
3 2
4 QTY
49 31
30 48
SPACING QTY
618 SF
DESCRIPTION MATERIAL / MODEL NO. COLOR / FINISH / PATTERN MANUFACTURER/ SUPPLIER REQUIRED SAMPLE/MOCKUP REMARKS / COMMENTS 4" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE
BOMANITE 12"x12" TILE PATTERN FRANCISCAN RED COLOR BOMANITE SHOP PROVIDE 3'X3' MOCK UP FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY CITY'S AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE
HARDSCAPE LEGEND
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. HEIGHT/SPREAD CAL. WUCOLS TREES
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. - - - -
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA
CRAPE MYRTLE 24" BOX 5`-6` HT. X 4`-5` SPR. L
QUERCUS ENGELMANNII
ENGELMANN OAK 24" BOX 9-10` HT. X 4-5` SPR, VL
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD SHRUBS
BULBINE FRUTESCENS 'TINY TANGERINE'
TINY TANGERINE BULBINE 5 GAL. 72" O.C. L 1'-2' HT. X 2'-3' SPR.
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
RED YUCCA 5 GAL. 60" O.C. VL 2`-3` HT. X 3`-5` SPR.
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE'
BREEZE™ MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR.
LOMANDRA X 'PLATINUM BEAUTY'
VARIEGATED DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR.
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD
GROUND COVERS
ROCK COBBLE
TO MATCH EXISTING -
PLANT LEGEND
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 28+00
SEE SHEET 61
MATCH LINE STA 34+50
SEE SHEET 63
NORTH
PLANTING PLAN
1. REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL PREP, FERTILIZING, BACKFILL, PLANT SELECTION, WARRANTY'S, ETC.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. ANY PLANT MATERIAL FOUND AT THE SITE EXHIBITING SIGNS OF PESTS AND/OR DISEASE WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. ONCE ROUGH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AND HAVE AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTS CONDUCTED. TESTS SHALL REVIEW SOIL FERTILITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL PREPERATION PRIOT TO PLANTING. SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN SOILS REPORT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE APPROVED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 3" DARK, HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. CITY MAINTAINED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE GORILLA HAIR MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ON CSUF CAMPUS SHALL RECEIVE TLC BROWN BARK CHIP OR APPROVED EQUAL.
SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. NO SHREDDED MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED.
6. WHERE ANY TREE IS LOCATED WITHIN SIX FEET OF ANY PAVING SURFACE IN ANY DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROOT BARRIER TEN FEET IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE, ALL SIDES OF THE TREE AS REQUIRED. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE 24" PANELS BY DEEP ROOT CORP. OR APPROVED EQUAL., MODEL UB-24-2, ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS PER THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, 2% MIN.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WOULD MAKE THE PROPOSED DESIGN UNACHIEVABLE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY IF ANY SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES COULD RESULT IN THE REJECTION AND REMOVAL OF FINISHED WORK AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES:
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING PLANTING AREAS DAMAGED BY THIS
WORK THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF
WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PATCH/REPAIR/REPLACE EXISTING
PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE THROUGHOUT AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
EXISTING PLANTING SCOPE
EXISTING MEDIAN TO REMAIN -
PROTECT IN PLACE
SSS
CALTRANS
R/W
SR-57 SBOFF RAMP
SR-57 SBON RAMP
SR-57
SR-57 NB ON
RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
NUTWOOD AVENUE
CALTRANS
R/W
SR-57
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
FULLERTON
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
FULLERTON
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. HEIGHT/SPREAD CAL. WUCOLS TREES
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. - - - -
QUERCUS ENGELMANNII
ENGELMANN OAK 24" BOX 9-10` HT. X 4-5` SPR, VL
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD SHRUBS
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
RED YUCCA 5 GAL. 60" O.C. VL 2`-3` HT. X 3`-5` SPR.
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE'
BREEZE™ MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR.
LOMANDRA X 'PLATINUM BEAUTY'
VARIEGATED DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL. 72" O.C. L 2'-3' HT. X 4'-6' SPR.
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. SPACING WUCOLS HEIGHT/SPREAD
GROUND COVERS
ROCK COBBLE
TO MATCH EXISTING -
PLANT LEGEND
DESCRIPTION MATERIAL / MODEL NO. COLOR / FINISH / PATTERN MANUFACTURER/ SUPPLIER REQUIRED SAMPLE/MOCKUP REMARKS / COMMENTS 4" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE
BOMANITE 12"x12" TILE PATTERN FRANCISCAN RED COLOR BOMANITE SHOP PROVIDE 3'X3' MOCK UP FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY CITY'S AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE
HARDSCAPE LEGEND
QTY
1 1
QTY
15 9
16 SPACING QTY
398 SF
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 34+50
SEE SHEET 62
MATCH LINE STA 40+50
SEE SHEET
64 PLANTING PLAN
1. REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL PREP, FERTILIZING, BACKFILL, PLANT SELECTION, WARRANTY'S, ETC.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. ANY PLANT MATERIAL FOUND AT THE SITE EXHIBITING SIGNS OF PESTS AND/OR DISEASE WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. ONCE ROUGH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AND HAVE AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTS CONDUCTED. TESTS SHALL REVIEW SOIL FERTILITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL PREPERATION PRIOT TO PLANTING. SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN SOILS REPORT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE APPROVED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 3" DARK, HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. CITY MAINTAINED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE GORILLA HAIR MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ON CSUF CAMPUS SHALL RECEIVE TLC BROWN BARK CHIP OR APPROVED EQUAL.
SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. NO SHREDDED MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED.
6. WHERE ANY TREE IS LOCATED WITHIN SIX FEET OF ANY PAVING SURFACE IN ANY DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROOT BARRIER TEN FEET IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE, ALL SIDES OF THE TREE AS REQUIRED. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE 24" PANELS BY DEEP ROOT CORP. OR APPROVED EQUAL., MODEL UB-24-2, ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS PER THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, 2% MIN.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WOULD MAKE THE PROPOSED DESIGN UNACHIEVABLE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY IF ANY SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES COULD RESULT IN THE REJECTION AND REMOVAL OF FINISHED WORK AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES:
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING PLANTING AREAS DAMAGED BY THIS
WORK THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF
WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PATCH/REPAIR/REPLACE EXISTING
PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE THROUGHOUT AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
EXISTING PLANTING SCOPE
NORTH
D
D
D
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
S
SS
E
PLACENTIA AVENUE
NUTWOOD AVENUE
SR-57 NB ON
RAMP
SR-57 NBOFF RAMP
CALTRANS
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
DENNY'S
MOONRAKER
APARTMENTS
WORLD OIL
CHEVRON
LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK
CALTRANS
R/W
FULLERTON
R/W
CALTRANS
R/W
FULLERTON
R/W
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT. HEIGHT/SPREAD CAL. WUCOLS QTY TREES
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. - - - - 1
PLANT LEGEND
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
MATCH LINE STA 40+50
SEE SHEET
63 NORTH
PLANTING PLAN
1. REFER TO PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING SOIL PREP, FERTILIZING, BACKFILL, PLANT SELECTION, WARRANTY'S, ETC.
2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL THAT IS FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASE. ANY PLANT MATERIAL FOUND AT THE SITE EXHIBITING SIGNS OF PESTS AND/OR DISEASE WILL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
3. ONCE ROUGH GRADES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED IN PLANTING AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN AND HAVE AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY TESTS CONDUCTED. TESTS SHALL REVIEW SOIL FERTILITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOIL PREPERATION PRIOT TO PLANTING. SUBMIT SOIL TEST RESULTS TO OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. SUBMIT EVIDENCE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN SOILS REPORT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
4. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE APPROVED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 3" DARK, HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. CITY MAINTAINED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE GORILLA HAIR MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL. LANDSCAPE AREAS LOCATED ON CSUF CAMPUS SHALL RECEIVE TLC BROWN BARK CHIP OR APPROVED EQUAL.
SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. NO SHREDDED MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED.
6. WHERE ANY TREE IS LOCATED WITHIN SIX FEET OF ANY PAVING SURFACE IN ANY DIRECTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A ROOT BARRIER TEN FEET IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE CENTER OF THE TREE, ALL SIDES OF THE TREE AS REQUIRED. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE 24" PANELS BY DEEP ROOT CORP. OR APPROVED EQUAL., MODEL UB-24-2, ASSEMBLE AND INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH PLANTING OPERATIONS PER THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, 2% MIN.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WOULD MAKE THE PROPOSED DESIGN UNACHIEVABLE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IMMEDIATELY IF ANY SUCH CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES COULD RESULT IN THE REJECTION AND REMOVAL OF FINISHED WORK AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PLANTING NOTES:
CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING PLANTING AREAS DAMAGED BY THIS
WORK THROUGHOUT THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT'S LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. LIMITS SHOWN HERE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL ATTENTION BEYOND WHAT IS SHOWN. SCOPE OF
WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS TO PATCH/REPAIR/REPLACE EXISTING
PLANTING AREAS AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE THROUGHOUT AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
EXISTING PLANTING SCOPE
NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT CIP PROJECT 48008
CIP 48008 - NUTWOOD AVENUE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT JW/CS
ML
PQ
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
11/26/2025
SIGNATURE
LICENSED
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
RENEWAL DATE
DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PLANTING DETAILS
LEGEND
EDGE OF CURB/ EDGE OF PAVING/ FACE OF WALL
PLANT MATERIAL
PLACE ONE SHRUB AT CORNER
1 2
3 NOTES
A. REFERR TO PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLANS FOR SPACING/ LAYOUT
PLANT SPACING
SCALE: 3/8" = 1"-0"
LC
LC
LC LC LC
LC LC
LC
LC
LC LC LC
LC
LC
LC
LC
LC
TRIANGULAR
SQUARE
1 2
3 1
2 1
2" SPACING - SEE
PLANT LEGEND
SPACING - SEEPLANT LEGEND
SPACE - SEE
PLANT LEGEND
SPACE - SEE
PLANT LEGEND
SPACING - SEE
PLANT LEGEND
1'-6"
DEPTH OF
ROOTBALL
SHRUB PLANTING
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
2 1
6 5
4 3
2X
ROOTBALL DIAMETER
7 6"
NOT TO SCALE
TYPICAL SECTION
N.T.S.
LEGEND
3" HIGH WATER RETENTION BASIN, FORMED FROM PLANT PIT SPOILS/MULCH; MAINTAIN 2" MIN. MULCH ATOP ROOTBALL.
FINISH GRADE WITH APPROVED MULCH. REFER TO NOTES.
PLANTING TABLETS. REFER TO NOTES.
ROOTBALL. INSTALL CROWN 1" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
PREPARED BACKFILL/NATIVE SOIL MIX; GRADUALLY ADD SOIL AND COMPACT LIGHTLY WHEN BACKFILLING; WATER HALFWAY AND ALLOW TO DRAIN PRIOR TO ADDING MORE SOIL.
SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANT PIT; BREAK UP HARD/COMPACTED SOIL AND LOOSEN SOIL. 6" ZONE OF OVER-EXCAVATED AND RECOMMENDED BACKFILL SOIL. 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 NOTES
A. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL HAVE A 3" LAYER OF
APPROVED NITROLIZED ORGANIC LANDSCAPE MULCH.
B
REFER TO THE PROJECT HORTICULTURAL SOILS
REPORT FOR ALL BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS
REQUIRED.
C.
AVOID PLANT INSTALLATION DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF
IRRIGATION SPRAY AND RAKE OUT ALL SOIL
EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED.
D.
PLANT TABS TO BE "SCOTTS-AGRIFORM" OR APPROVED
EQUAL. QUANTITY AS RECOMMENDED BY
MANUFACTURER SIZE TABLET CHART.
PREVAILING
WIND
TREE PLANTING
LEGEND
PROPOSED TREE
LODGE POLE PINE STAKES.
ONE (1) - 2" DIA. x 8' LONG STAKE FOR 5 GALLON. TWO (2) - 2" DIA. x 10' LONG STAKES FOR 15 GALLON AND 24" BOX TREES. TWO (2) - 3" DIA. x 12' LONG DIAMETER STAKES FOR 36" BOX AND LARGER.
TREE TIE, LOOP TREE TIE AROUND TREE BRANCH, TWIST TIE, THEN LOOP AROUND STAKE & DRIVE NAIL THROUGH THE TIE AT THE BACK OF STAKE.
PROVIDE TWO (2) TIES FOR 5 GAL. & THREE (3) TIES 15 GAL. & LARGER TREES.
TREE ROOTBALL; INSTALL 5 GAL. & 15 GAL., 1" ABOVE GRADE. 24" BOX & LARGER, 3" ABOVE GRADE. TAPER ROOTBALL EDGE TO GRADE.
4" HIGH WATER RETENTION BASIN. FORM FROM PLANT PIT EXCAVATION.
BASIN NO LARGER THAN ROOTBALL.
FINISHED GRADE WITH APPROVED MULCH; REFER TO NOTES.
PLANTING TABLETS; REFER TO NOTES.
PREPARED BACKFILL/NATIVE SOIL MIX; GRADUALLY ADD SOIL AND COMPACT LIGHTLY WHEN BACKFILLING; WATER HALFWAY AND ALLOW TO
DRAIN PRIOR TO ADDING MORE SOIL
SEE SEPARATE ROOTBALL DRAINAGE AND AERATION DETAIL
UNDISTURBED SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANT PIT. BREAK UP
HARD/COMPACTED SOIL AND LOOSEN SOIL.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
NOTES
A. ALL PLANT AREAS SHALL HAVE A 3" LAYER OF NITROLIZED ORGANIC LANDSCAPE MULCH, TYP. PLACED IN WATER RETENTION BASIN.
B. LIBERALLY DUST SIDES AND BOTTOM OF PITS W/ FINELY GROUND AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM.
C. TREE TIES TO BE "CINCH TIE" BY V.I.T. PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL.
D. FOR AGENCY MAINTAINED TREES, REFER TO THE GOVERNING AGENCY STANDARD DETAIL FOR TREE TIE REQUIREMENTS.
E. REFER TO THE PROJECT HORTICULTURAL SOILS REPORT FOR ALL REQUIRED BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS.
F. PLANT TABS TO BE "SCOTTS-AGRIFORM" OR APPROVED EQUAL AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER PLANT SIZE TABLET CHART.
G. REFER TO SINGLE STAKE TREE DETAIL FOR LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS, CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS AND COLUMNAR TREES.
H. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 3'-0" RADIUS CLEAR EARTH AREA AROUND TREE TRUNK WHEN PLANTED IN TURF AREAS.
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"
DEPTH OF
ROOTBALL
6"
6 5
4 3
2 1
2X ROOTBALL
DIAMETER
24"
8 10
7 6" ZONE OF OVER-EXCAVATED AND RECOMMENDED BACKFILL SOIL11 11 9
3 NOT TO SCALE C
E
BA
D SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
LEGEND
PROPOSED TREE/ROOTBALL WITH STAKES AND TIES;
REFER TO TREE PLANTING DETAIL
ROOT BARRIER AS REQUIRED. 5' MIN CLEARANCE
FROM TREE TRUNK TO ADJACENT HARDSCAPE.
PROVIDE A 2'-0" MIN. DEEP HIGH DENSITY
POLYETHYLENE BLACK LINEAR BARRIER.
FINISH GRADE WITH APPROVED MULCH. REFER TO
NOTES
ADJACENT HARDSCAPE. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION
PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
NATIVE SOIL BACKFILLED FIRMLY ALONG ROOT
BARRIER
TREE DRIP LINE
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, WHERE APPLICABLE
ADJACENT UTILITY LINES, WHERE APPLICABLE
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
NOTES
A.
ROOT BARRIER TO BE AVAILABLE AT VIT PRODUCTS OR
APPROVED EQUAL. PROVIDE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS FOR
REVIEW/ APPROVALS.
B. TOP OF BARRIER SHALL BE 1" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. DO NOT
ENCIRCLE ROOTBALL
C. PROVIDE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
D.
LENGTH OF ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12' OR
EQUAL TO THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE AT MATURITY,
WHICHEVER IS GREATER.
E. ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS FOR ROOT BARRIERS PER THE
DIRECTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,
3 8
2 5
1 2
4 3
1 UNDER 5'-0"UNDER 5'-0"
TYPICAL SECTION
N.T.S.
TYPICAL SECTION ADJACENT TO CURB
N.T.S.
PLAN VIEW - ADJACENT TO CURB
N.T.S.
1 2
5 1
2 4
3 7
7 2
6 2
4 ROOT BARRIER INSTALL
NOT TO SCALE
STAMPED CONCRETE
LEGEND
INSTALL 8" TYPE B CURB PER CIVIL PLANS.
INSTALL 4" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE.
COMPACT SUBGRADE
INSTALL 4" THICK CLASS A TOPSOIL IN TREE PLANTING AREAS.
NATIVE SOIL OTHERWISE. (EXACT LIMITS DETERMINED IN FIELD)
AC PAVEMENT
9"L #3 DOWEL @ 36" O.C. - 3" EMBED INTO CURB TYPICAL
1 2
3 4
5 6
SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
STAMPED CONCRETE MEDIAN CONDITION
6" WIDTH VARIES 6"
6" WIDTH VARIES 6"1'-0" 1'-0"
STAMPED CONCRETE MEDIAN STRIP CONDITION
1 5
2 3
2 3
1 5
1 5
2 4
3 1
5 2
4 3
6 6
6 6