102026 PW On-Call Professional Airport Consultant Services C&S Engineers, Inc PSA — City Council - Successor Agency - Housing Authority, October 20, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF FULLERTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH
C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this __ day of October 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF FULLERTON, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and C&S Engineers, Inc., a New York State Corporation (“Consultant”).

W I T N E S S E T H :

A. City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide certain Professional Architectural, Engineering, Planning, and/or Environmental services, on an as-needed basis, as more fully described herein.

B. Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code section 37103, and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated.

C. City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described herein, and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection with the services to be performed.

D. No official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions of Sections 1090-1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT

1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in the City’s Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”), attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and Consultant’s Response to City’s RFP (“Consultant’s Proposal”), attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, both incorporated herein by this reference.

1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound professional practices. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws and regulations that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement.

1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, in accordance with the applicable professional standard of care and City specifications and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the work will be done by the City Manager or his designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory, City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the matters of concern;
C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 2 ends

(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.

1.4. Warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this Agreement in compliance with all applicable and non conflicting Federal and California employment laws, including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers’ compensation insurance and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description including attorneys’ fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which may be incurred by reason of Consultant’s performance under this Agreement.

1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the Government Code.

1.6. Non-Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services contemplated by this Agreement.

1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant’s sole cost and expense.

1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING

2.1. Compensation. Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B. Consultant’s total compensation shall be based on each proposal the Consultant submits and the City accepts for the services requested on a particular project.

2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services provided outside the scope of services specified in Exhibit A unless the City or the Project C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 3 ends

Manager for this Project, prior to Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.

2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to the City for approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within fourty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices.

2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times from the Effective Date of this Agreement until three (3) years after the termination date.

2.5. W-9. Consultant must provide City with a current W-9 form prior to the commencement of work under this Agreement. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to provide to the City any revised or updated W-9 form during the term of this Agreement.

3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.

3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a party.

4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION

4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue througha period of five (5) years, unless terminated as provided herein.

4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.

The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.

4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including the date of City’s written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be prorated based on the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 4 ends

accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the City or in the possession of the Consultant.

4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings, maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal expense to Consultant.

5.0. INSURANCE

5.1. Insurance Required. Consultant shall procure and maintain throughout the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall provide current evidence of the required insurance in a form acceptable to City and shall provide replacement evidence for any required insurance which expires prior to the completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement.

Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting in any way, the Indemnification and Hold Harmless clause contained herein in Section 6.8 or the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.

5.2. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance.

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form #CG 00 01, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to the Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

B. Business Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain business automobile liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form # CA 00 01, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non-owned automobiles.

C. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California and employers’ liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident.

D. Professional Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with a limit of not less than $2,000,000.

Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retro date of the policy shall be prior to the start of the contract work.

C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 5 ends

E. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond. Consultant shall maintain a fidelity bond with a minimum limit of $1,000,000, providing coverage for the acts of all employees, officers and directors of Consultant.

F. Cyber Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain cyber liability insurance coverage with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Consultant in this Agreement and shall include but not be limited to claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security.

The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines, penalties and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.

5.3. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by City.

5.4. Other Insurance Provisions. The required insurance policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

A. Commercial General Liability. City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. Such coverage as an additional insured shall not be limited to the period of time during which Consultant is conducting ongoing operations for City but rather, shall continue after the completion of such operations. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection afforded to City, its officers, employees and volunteers.

B. Commercial General Liability. This insurance shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, employees and volunteers and shall apply separately to each insured against whom a suit is brought or a claim is made. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees and volunteers shall be excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

C. Professional Liability. If the Professional Liability policy is written on a “claims made” form, the Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or beginning of contract work. The insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least (5) years after completion of the contract work. If the coverage is canceled or non-renewed and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting coverage” for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

D. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance. Insurer shall waive their right of subrogation against City, its officers, employees and volunteers for work done on behalf of City.

E. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond, City shall be named as third party beneficiary for losses arising from work done on behalf of City.

F. All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 6 ends

endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

If Consultant maintains higher limits or has broader coverage than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to all coverage, and to the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

G. Subcontractors. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subconsultants.

H. Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage or other special circumstances.

5.5 Acceptability of Insurers. All required insurance shall be placed with insurers acceptable to City with current BEST’S ratings of no less than A, Class VII. Workers’ compensation insurance may be placed with the California State Compensation Insurance Fund.

All insurers shall be licensed by or hold admitted status in the State of California. At the sole discretion of City, insurance provided by non-admitted or surplus carriers with a minimum BEST’S rating of no less than A- Class X may be accepted if Consultant evidences the requisite need to the sole satisfaction of City.

5.6 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance which bear original signatures of authorized agents and which reflect insurers names and addresses, policy numbers, coverage, limits, deductibles and self-insured retentions.

Additionally, Consultant shall furnish copies of all policy endorsements required herein. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by City before work commences.

City reserves the right to require at any time complete, certified copies of any or all required insurance policies and endorsements.

6.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS

6.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including exhibits to this Agreement.

6.2. Representatives. The City Manager or his designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.

Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.

C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 7 ends

6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.

6.4. Notices. Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery, facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent through regular United States mail.

IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY:

C&S Companies
2355 Northside Dr., Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
Attn: Kenneth Gethers, Jr.

Project Manager
City of Fullerton
303 W. Commonwealth Ave.

Fullerton, CA 92832
Attn: Stephen Bise
Director of Public Works

6.5. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof.

6.6. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California.

6.7. Assignment. Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this Agreement.

Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder for the term of this Agreement.

6.8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent of the law, Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees, at Consultant’s sole expense, from and against claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees arising out of the performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the professional services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 8 ends

the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action, complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees based upon the work performed by Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints, or suits arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained either in the City’s specifications or Consultant’s Proposal, which shall be of no force and effect.

6.9. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.

Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers, agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable worker’s compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this paragraph.

6.10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

6.11. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 9 ends

any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.

6.12. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, CAD drawings, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City. Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from City’s use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports, documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs, files, audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized representative, at no additional cost to the City.

6.13. Public Records Act Disclosure. Consultant has been advised and is aware that this Agreement and all reports, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement and provided to City may be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Section 6250 et seq.).

Exceptions to public disclosure may be those documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret. The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.

6.14. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090.

During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute.

6.15. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant occurs, without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled to at law or equity, Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. In addition, Consultant shall reimburse City for any and all costs, expenses and/or damages, if any, that the City has incurred due to the aforementioned error or omission.

6.16. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of City C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 10 ends

while this Agreement is in effect.

6.17. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.

6.18. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein.

6.19. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this Agreement.

6.20. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

6.21. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

6.22. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.

6.23. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

6.24. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good faith negotiations.

6.25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.

C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Page 11 ends

6.26. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that by doing so the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.

6.27 Executive Order N-6-22. On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-6-22 (the EO) regarding Economic Sanctions against Russia and Russian entities and individuals. “Economic Sanctions” refers to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law. The EO directs state agencies to terminate contracts with, and to refrain from entering any new contracts with, individuals or entities that are determined to be a target of Economic Sanctions. Accordingly, should the City determine Contractor is a target of Economic Sanctions or is conducting prohibited transactions with sanctioned individuals or entities, that shall be grounds for termination of this agreement. The City shall provide Contractor advance written notice of such termination, allowing Contractor at least 30 calendar days to provide a written response. Termination shall be at the sole discretion of the City.

Contractor shall immediately notify City in writing upon being subjected to Economic Sanctions or upon being charged by an government agency of conducting prohibited transactions within the meaning of Executive Order N-6-22.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their respective authorized officers, as of the date first above written.

CITY OF FULLERTON
__________________________________ Date: __________________________ Stephen Bise, Director of Public Works

CONSULTANT

__________________________________ Date: __________________________ Kenneth Gethers, Jr., Project Manager
__________________________
Social Security or Taxpayer ID Number
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Richard D. Jones, City Attorney S ENGINEERS, INC.
y , 10-2-2026
13-5318940

EXHIBIT A

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CITY OF FULLERTON

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION

PROFESSIONAL

ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING/PLANNING/ENVIRONMEN

TAL SERVICES INVOLVING DESIGNATED CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS AT FULLERTON

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
2526-RFQ-012
PROPOSAL DUE:

JUNE 26, 2026, 4:30 PM
For more information, please visit our online supplier portal, located at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton
Table Of Contents

1. SECTION I

1.1. NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

2. SECTION II

2.1. INTRODUCTION

2.2. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

2.3. SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

2.4. SCOPE OF WORK

3. SECTION III

3.1. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

3.2. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

4. SECTION IV

4.1. EVALUATION AND AWARD

4.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

5. SECTION V

5.1. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

5.2. ATTACHMENTS
Attachments:

A - PSA - Standard -Master-SAMPLE

1. SECTION I

1.1. NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

1.1.1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
The City of Fullerton is requesting Proposals from qualified airport planning, engineering, and environmental firms for the completion of plans and specifications necessary to complete various improvement projects involving designated capital improvement projects at the Fullerton Municipal Airport. These various projects are part of the five-year Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) submittal to FAA LAX-ADO.

Interested firms shall submit their proposal no later than 4:30 pm on Friday, June 26, 2026.

This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) provides information on the City of Fullerton, the required scope of services, the consultant/contractor selection process, and the minimum information that must be included in the RFQ Response. Selection of the approved consultant will be based upon overall staff qualifications, relevant design experience, and demonstrated familiarity with the FAA project development process. The final contract for professional services will be in conformance with the provisions of FAA AC 150/5100-14E, "Architectural, Engineering, and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects" and Title 49 CFR Part 26 ”Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Programs.”
Prior to the award of contract, the City reserves the right to cancel this request for proposals without notice. The scope of the various project improvements are covered under federal grant assurances and jurisdiction, requiring interaction and coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Los Angeles Airports District Office (ADO).

Parties submitting proposals shall be prepared to perform all work in accordance with FAA, State, and local policies and guidelines. The final scope of work and schedule will be negotiated upon selection of the most qualified firm, and subject to the availability of federal and state grants. The final scope and fee for each project will be negotiated separately upon FAA approval to fund the projects, or by fiscal year.

Please note that the City is seeking a Statement of Qualifications proposal, in which a "Cost Proposal" or "Fee Schedule" is not being requested at this time. The City is seeking to award multiple on-call professional services agreements with the firms selected to perform the required scope of services based on a number of qualifying and determinable factors, as outlined in this RFP. Once the top ranked firm is selected, the City will seek a Cost Proposal for said Project. Proposals will be evaluated based on firm’s qualifications and experience, ability to perform scope of services and implementation plan, and any other criteria set out herein this RFQ. The City shall be the sole judge of the qualifications and services and reserves the right to select firm(s) on any basis or weighted criteria that is in the best interests of the City.

1.1.2. BACKGROUND
The City of Fullerton is located 22 miles southeast of metropolitan Los Angeles, in the center of North Orange County. Fullerton is a full-service, general law city that was incorporated in 1904. Fullerton is renowned for its unique mix of residential, commercial, industrial, educational, and cultural environments and is known for being “the Education Community”. Fullerton has 52 City parks, a museum, a cultural center, a public library, a golf course, and 29 miles of recreational trails. Fullerton provides an outstanding quality of life for both residents and businesses. At 22.4 square miles, Fullerton is also one of the largest cities in Orange County by area and is the sixth most populous.

1.1.3. SUBMITTAL DEADLINE
COMPLETE ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN Friday, June 26, 2026 at 4:30 pm PST via the City’s eProcurement portal, OpenGov at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton. Proposals submitted by email, mail, or fax, will not be accepted nor considered. Failure to upload due to electronic glitches is not a legitimate reason for proposals submitted after the deadline. The City may extend the deadline at its discretion. Please see instructions in Section 3 for details on how to submit a proposal to this RFQ.

It is not the responsibility of the City to notify potential bidders. Prospective bidders shall be notified via the City’s eProcurement portal, OpenGov at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton. Registration is free and prospective bidders and firms may select to be notified of all future bids posted by the City of Fullerton.

Proposed RFQ Schedule
** Proposed RFQ Schedule is “Tentative” and may be changed at the City’s discretion.

Interviews will be scheduled if required **
Release of RFQ: May 29, 2026
Question Submittal Deadline: June 12, 2026, 4:30pm
Response to Questions Posted: June 19, 2026, 4:30pm
RFQ Submittal Deadline: June 26, 2026, 4:30pm
Consultant Interviews: TBD
Agreement/Contract Finalized: August 2026
Agreement/Contract Award: August 2026

2. SECTION II

2.1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Fullerton is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced firms for

PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING/PLANNING/ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES INVOLVING DESIGNATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS AT FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT.

It is the intent of the City of Fullerton to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with a qualified aviation engineering consultant firm for a period of five (5) years. Services requested include general consulting, planning, environmental, engineering, surveying, geotechnical consulting and may include construction inspection/management services.

The scope of work may include, but not be limited to, the following projects as listed in Fullerton Municipal Airports five-year Airport Capital Improvement Plan:
• Update Airport Layout Plan
• South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and Markings Rehabilitation • Southeast Hangars Rehabilitation - Phase II
• AAM/UAM Planning and Feasibility Studies

2.2. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Only those consultants with qualified experience as it relates to the services requested in this solicitation will be considered during the evaluation process. Consultant staff assigned to execute the scope of services must have relevant experience in providing the necessary services as described under the scope of services. All personnel assigned to complete the scope of work shall possess appropriate certifications or registrations as required by state and local agencies.

2.3. SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
The following projects are part of the five year Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) submittal to FAA LAX-ADO.

2.3.1. SOUTH AIRCRAFT PARKING RAMP PAVEMENT AND MARKINGS REHABILTATION FY2028:

This project will include the in place pulverization of existing asphalt concrete parking ramp on the south side of the airport. Approximate project area is 150,000 square feet. New aircraft tie down anchors will be installed and striping will be replaced. Airport staff is also considering a revised layout for aircraft parking concurrent with this project.

2.3.2. SOUTHEAST HANGAR REHABILITATION FY2026/27 PHASES 1&2:

The southeast aircraft storage hangars are aging and are in need of upgrades such as new roofing, new rain gutters, electrical upgrades, paint, and new weather stripping. All work will need to be accomplished with hangar contents in place and well protected.

2.3.3. URBAN AIR MOBILITY/ADVANCED AIR MOBILITY:

Fullerton Airport has been identified as a key location for several different air taxi companies including JOBY Aviation, WISK Aero, and BETA Technologies. Feasibility and/or planning studies will need to be conducted to highlight electrical power for charging, aircraft parking, aircraft operations, and vehicle parking.

2.3.4. UPDATE AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP):

Update ALP and Exhibit A Property Map to reflect new and proposed construction and other airfield modifications.

2.4. SCOPE OF WORK
The City of Fullerton is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced firms for

PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING/PLANNING/ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES INVOLVING DESIGNATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS AT FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT.

It is the intent of the City of Fullerton to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with a qualified aviation engineering consultant firm for a period of five years. Services requested include general consulting, planning, environmental, engineering, surveying, geotechnical consulting and may include construction inspection/management services.

3. SECTION III

3.1. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

3.1.1. Examination of Proposal Documents
By submitting a proposal, firm(s) represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the work required under this RFQ and is capable of performing quality work to achieve the City’s objectives.

3.1.2. Addenda
Any changes to the requirements will be made by written addendum to this RFQ and will be posted on OpenGov and City of Fullerton Bid Webpage. Any written addenda issued pertaining to this RFQ shall be incorporated into the terms and conditions of any resulting Agreement. City will not be bound to any modifications to or deviations from the requirements set forth in this RFQ as the result of oral instructions. Firms shall acknowledge receipt of addenda in their proposals.

If a Proposer discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other error in the RFQ, the proposer should immediately provide the City written notice of the problem and request that the RFQ be clarified or modified. Without disclosing the source of the request, the City may modify the documents prior to the date fixed for submission of proposals by issuing an addendum.

If prior to the date fixed for submissions, a firm(s) knows of or should have known of an error in the RFQ but fails to notify the City of the error, the firm shall submit a proposal at their own risk, and if awarded a contract, shall not be entitled to additional compensation or time by reason of the error or its later correction.

3.1.3. Request for Information
Submitting Questions
All questions must be submitted and received by the City no later than 4:30 pm PST on Friday, June 12, 2026.

Request for clarifications, questions and comments must be submitted through the City’s eProcurement Portal at OpenGov (https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton).

Registration is free and interested proposers can select to receive automatic bid notifications from the City.

City Responses
Responses from the City will be posted as an Addendum to this RFQ on the City’s eProcurement Portal, OpenGov to be posted no later than Friday, June 19, 2026.

City’s eProcurement Portal – OpenGov:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton
General Inquiries
General questions regarding this RFQ are to be directed to the City’s Purchasing Division as follows:

Vanessa Slouka, Buyer
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: (714) 738-6533
** Any contact outside of the City staff/representative shall be cause for disqualification **

3.1.4. California Public Records Act (CPRA)
All proposals submitted in response of this RFQ become the property of the City and under the Public Records Act (Government Code Section 7920.000 el. Seq.) are public record, and as such, may be subject to public review. However, the proposals shall not be disclosed until final negotiations are complete and/or recommendation for action is made to City Manager and/or the City Council.

If a proposer claims a privilege against public disclosure for trade secret or other proprietary information, such information must be clearly identified in the proposal. Note that under California Law, price proposal to a public agency is not a trade secret.

3.1.5. Acceptance of Proposals
A. City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any item or part thereof, or to waive any informalities or irregularities in proposals.

B. City reserves the right to withdraw or cancel this RFQ at any time without prior notice, and the City makes no representations that any contract will be awarded to any Proposer responding to this RFQ.

C. City reserves the right to postpone proposal openings for its own convenience.

D. Submitted proposals are not to be copyrighted.

E. City does not guarantee any work upon award of an agreement.

3.1.6. Pre-Contractual Expenses
City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by firm in the preparation of its proposal. Firm shall not include any such expenses as part of its proposal.

Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by firm(s) in:

A. Preparing its proposal in response to this RFQ;
B. Submitting that proposal to the City;
C. Negotiating with the City any matter related to this proposal; or any other expenses incurred by firm prior to date of award, if any, of the Agreement.

3.1.7. Joint Offers
Where two or more firms desire to submit a single proposal in response to this RFQ, they should do so on a prime-sub-consultant basis rather than as a joint venture. City intends to do business with a single firm per awarded agreement and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture.

3.1.8. Professional Services Agreement
The selected firm shall enter into an agreement with the City based upon the contents of the RFQ and the firm’s proposal. The City’s standard form of agreement is included as Attachment A. The firm shall carefully review the agreement, especially with regard to the indemnity and insurance provisions, and include with the proposal a description of any exceptions, technical or contractual, requested to the standard contract. It is highly unlikely the City will accept any changes, modifications, or waivers of any provision of this Agreement and the City has the right to reject any proposed changes.

If there are exceptions or are no exceptions, a statement to the effect shall be provided in Section 6.1 Vendor Questionnaire, Question 3.

3.1.9. City Business License
The successful consultant(s) and sub-consultants are required to obtain and maintain a City of Fullerton business license. The City business license shall be maintained for the duration of the Agreement. A current business license is not a prerequisite for submittal of the qualifications.

3.2. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.2.1. Commercial General Liability Insurance.

Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form #CG 00 01, with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence.

If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to the Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

3.2.2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance.

Consultant shall maintain business automobile liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form # CA 00 01, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non-owned automobiles.

3.2.3. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance.

Consultant shall maintain workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California and employers’ liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident.

3.2.4. Professional Liability Insurance
Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with a limit of not less than $2,000,000. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retro date of the policy shall be prior to the start of the contract work.

3.2.5. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond
Consultant shall maintain a fidelity bond with a minimum limit of $1,000,000, providing coverage for the acts of all employees, officers and directors of Consultant.

3.2.6. Cyber Liability Insurance
Consultant shall maintain cyber liability insurance coverage with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Consultant in this Agreement and shall include but not be limited to claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines, penalties and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.

3.2.7. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by City.

3.2.8. Other Insurance Provisions
The required insurance policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

B. Commercial General Liability. This insurance shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, employees and volunteers and shall apply separately to each insured against whom a suit is brought or a claim is made. Any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by City, its officers, employees and volunteers shall be excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

D. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance. Insurer shall waive their right of subrogation against City, its officers, employees and volunteers for work done on behalf of City.

E. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond, City shall be named as third party beneficiary for losses arising from work done on behalf of City.

F. All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

G. If Consultant maintains higher limits or has broader coverage than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to all coverage, and to the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

H. Subcontractors. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subconsultants.

I. Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage or other special circumstances.

3.3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Proposal Format and Content
This section provides the requirements which the City will look for and expect to be included in the proposal.

Electronic proposals shall be submitted electronically in a format that will print on 8 ½” x 11" size paper. Charts and schedules must adhere to this requirement as well. Proposals should not include any unnecessary elaborate or promotional material. Lengthy narrative is discouraged, and presentations should be brief and concise. Links to sample work should be clearly labeled and identified in the proposal.

The Proposal should be presented in the order shown and include the following:

3.3.1. Letter of Transmittal
The Letter of Transmittal shall be high-level and concise (recommended no more than 1 page), addressed to the City of Fullerton, and at a minimum contain the following:

A. Express the firm’s intent and formal interest in applying for this RFQ and why their firm’s services are advantageous/beneficial to the City.

B. Identification of proposer that will have contractual responsibility with the City.

Identification shall include legal name of company, corporate address, and telephone number. Include name, title, address, email and telephone number of the contact person identified during period of proposal evaluation.

C. Identification of all proposed sub-consultants (if applicable) including legal name of company, contact person’s name and address, and phone number.

D. Acknowledgment of receipt of all RFQ addenda, if any.

E. A statement to the effect that the proposal shall remain valid for a period of no less than 120 days from the date of submittal.

F. Signature of a person authorized to bind proposer to the terms of the proposal.

G. Signed statement attesting that all information submitted with the proposal is true and correct.

3.3.2. Qualifications & Experience
This section of the proposal should establish the ability of the firm(s) to satisfactorily perform the required work by reasons of: experience in performing work of the same or similar nature; demonstrated experience working with other public agencies; strength and stability of the firm(s); staffing capability; work load; record of meeting schedules on similar contracts; and supportive client references. Most recent references are preferrable.

Proposer to provide:

A. An overview of the proposal (including the firm’s relevant experience), a summary of the firm’s understanding of the requested Scope of Work, and its approach to providing those services.

B. A brief description of your firm’s background, size, office locations in California, including a narrative addressing performance record, experience in similar advisory services, quality of work, and ability to commit necessary time and resources to perform the Scope of Services described herein.

C. Qualifications of individuals to be assigned to perform the functions described in the Scope of Services herein.

D. List any disciplinary or investigative action, including audits, in the past five (5) years conducted by any professional body or local, state, or federal branch of government of your Firm.

E. List any and all litigation, pending or final, to which you are a party that is related or similar to the services being solicited in the past five (5) years.

F. References – Please provide at least three (3) client references for whom your firm has performed similar work to that requested in this RFQ during the past five (5) years. For each client, please provide the name, title, street address, telephone number, and email address.

G. Other Services – Please provide list of other services that your firm provides which are not identified in the Scope of Work but could be beneficial to the City.

3.3.3. Proposed Staffing and Organization
This section of the proposal should establish the method that will be used by the firm to manage the contract as well as identify key personnel assigned. Proposed staffing and organization are to be presented by firm identified in the Scope of Work.

Proposer to:

A. Provide education, experience and applicable professional credentials of contract staff. Include applicable professional credentials of “key” contract staff.

B. Identify primary Project Manager, role they will have with the City and primary office contact information.

C. Furnish brief resumes (no more than one page each) for key personnel.

D. Identify key personnel proposed to perform the work in the specified tasks and include major areas of subcontract work. Include the person's name, current location, and proposed position for this project, current assignment, and level of commitment to that assignment, availability for this assignment and how long each person has been with the firm.

E. Include an organization chart that clearly delineates communication/reporting relationships among the staff, including sub-consultants.

3.3.4. Detailed Work Plan
Proposer shall provide a narrative that addresses the Scope of Work and shows proposer's understanding of City's needs and requirements.

The Proposer shall:

A. Describe the proposed approach and work plan for completing the services specified in the Scope of Work. The description of the approach shall discuss the services in sufficient detail to demonstrate the proposer’s ability to accomplish the City’s objectives.

B. Describe the timeline for the work plan for completing the services specified in Scope of Work.

C. Describe approach to managing resources, including a description of the role(s) of any sub-consultants, if applicable, their specific responsibilities, and how their work will be supervised. Identify methods that proposer will use to ensure quality, budget, and schedule control.

3.3.5. Appendices
Information considered by Proposer to be pertinent to this agreement and which has not been specifically solicited in any of the aforementioned sections may be placed in a separate appendix section. Please note that this does not constitute an invitation to submit large amounts of extraneous materials. Appendices should be relevant and brief.

3.3.6. Fee Schedule / Cost Proposal
Cost proposals are NOT requested at this time and should not be submitted with your Statement of Qualifications proposal. Upon City’s evaluation of proposals, the top-ranked firm will be asked to provide project Cost Proposal for consideration.

4. SECTION IV

4.1. EVALUATION AND AWARD

4.1.1. Evaluation Criteria
City will evaluate the proposals received based on the following criteria outlined below and may utilize various weighting factors for different criteria or sub-criteria. Respondents who are not actively engaged in providing services of the nature proposed in their response to this request and/or who cannot clearly demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City their ability to satisfactorily perform the work in accordance with the requirements set forth in this request will not be considered. The City shall be the sole judge of the qualifications and services and its decision shall be final. Discussions may be conducted with respondents who submit qualifications determined to be reasonably acceptable of being selected for award.

City will evaluate the proposals received based on the criteria listed in the Evaluation Criteria Section.

The City will select a firm based upon the completeness and adherence to RFQ instructions, responding firms’ qualifications and experience, project management approach and work plan or implementation plan, as well as responses to any requests for information as set forth herein to this RFQ. If any addenda are made to the RFQ, the information provided will be considered as well. It should be noted that none of these factors in and of themselves are determinative, and the City reserves the right to select a firm on any basis that is in the best interests of the City.

The City may contact firms in response to questions raised in their proposals and the City reserves the right to cancel this solicitation without selecting any firms.

4.1.2. Evaluation Procedure
An Evaluation Committee will be selected to review and evaluate all proposals. The Evaluation Committee will be comprised of City staff and may include outside consultants to review all proposals submitted. The City of Fullerton reserves the right to request clarification of additional information from any firm at any time. After the proposals are evaluated, the City may elect to interview all, some, or none of the firms to help clarify and better evaluate each proposal. Firms may be asked to submit additional documentation at or after the interview stage or prepare a presentation. Please note that Interviews are at the City’s sole discretion and are not a requirement to make any recommendation to award an agreement.

Based upon evaluation of the proposals and any interviews (if conducted), the Evaluation Committee will recommend the top-ranked firms to award an agreement to the City Manager and/or City Council (if necessary).

The City reserves the right to select a firm without conducting interviews or abandon this RFQ. Final selection of firm and authority awarding agreements to proceed with these services shall be at the sole discretion of the City and if required, City Council.

4.1.3. Award
After conclusion of the evaluation period, a “Notice of Intent to Award” will be sent to all proposers to this RFQ identifying the top firm selected. Award to any firm selected is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final agreement terms and the approval of City. The City reserves the right to negotiate final agreement terms with the selected firm prior to award, and expressly reserves the right to negotiate with several firms simultaneously. However, since the selection and award may be made without discussion with any firm, the Proposer’s proposal submitted should contain firm's most favorable terms and conditions.

Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Proposers until an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, the City may negotiate an agreement with the next best qualified Proposer or withdraw the RFQ. In the event the City does not approve the recommendation to award, the RFQ may be cancelled without any cost or obligation of City.

City Manager and/or City Council action will be requested by City staff to award agreements to the selected firm

4.1.4. Notification of Award
Firms who submit a proposal in response to this RFQ shall be notified regarding the firm(s) awarded an agreement. Such notification shall be made within seven (7) days of the date the agreement is awarded. Notice of Intent to Award will be sent to all firms who submitted a proposal via OpenGov, the City’s eProcurement platform, and will also be available on the City’s Bid Webpage www.cityoffullerton.com/business/bids-rfps.

4.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA
An evaluation team will be established to review and evaluate all proposals submitted. The proposals received will be scored based on the following criteria using a 100 point total.

The firm that receives the highest score shall be recommended for award of contract following approval of the City Council. The City of Fullerton reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. All questions and answers are public information.

The City of Fullerton will cooperate in any requests for permissions or approvals required, but all permissions and approvals are the responsibility of the proponent. All applicable local, state, and federal permits and/or approvals required shall be the responsibility of the project proponent.

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Recognition of overall project concepts,
objectives and potential problems.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

2. Responsiveness to requirements. 0-100 Points 10
(10% of Total)

3. Capability to perform all aspects of the
project.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

4. Recent experience with similar airports
or project of comparable size and nature
to the proposed projects.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

5. Current workload and capability to meet
schedule and/or deadlines.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

6. Qualifications of the designated senior
individual who will be responsible for
delivery of all services.
0-100 Points 10
(10% of Total)

5. SECTION V

5.1. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Confirmation*
The Firm confirms that all the information provided is true and accurate. ☐ Please confirm
*Response required

2. Status of Past and Present Contract Form*
Firm shall list the status of past and present contracts where either the firm has provided services as a prime contractor or a sub-consultant during the past five (5) years and the contract has ended or will end in termination, settlement or litigation.

A. Public Agency city/county/other:

B. Contact Name:

C. Phone:

D. Project Award Date:

E. Original Contract Value:

F. Term of Contract:

1. Status of Contract:

2. Identify claims/litigation or settlements associated with the contract:
*Response required

3. Exceptions*
If your company is taking exception to any of the specifications, terms or conditions (including insurance indemnification and/or proposed contract language) stated in this Request for Proposal, please indicate below and describe details:

A. No exceptions taken
B. Exception taken to the scope of work or specifications C. Exception taken to indemnification and insurance requirements D. Exception to proposed contract language
E. Other
Please explain in detail:
*Response required

4. Technical Proposal*
Please submit your COMPLETE proposal, NOT to include the Fee Proposal, according to the instructions in REQUIRED PROPOSAL CONTENT.
*Response required

EXHIBIT B
CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL AND FEE SCHEDULE
City of Fullerton
Fullerton Municipal Airport
Professional Architectural/Engineering/
Planning/Environmental Services Involving
Designated Capital Improvement Program
Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport
June 26, 2026
C&S Engineers, Inc.
2355 Northside Drive, Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
www.cscos.com
www.cscos.com | (877) CS-SOLVE | (619) 296-9373 | [email protected] | 2355 Northside Dr., Suite 350, San Diego, CA 92108 June 26, 2026
City of Fullerton
303 W. Commonwealth Ave.

Fullerton, CA 92832
Re: Professional Architectural/Engineering/
Planning/Environmental Services Involving
Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects
at Fullerton Municipal Airport
Dear Selection Committee:

C&S is excited to submit this proposal in response
to the City of Fullerton's request for proposals
from qualified airport planning, engineering, and
environmental firms. C&S has provided on-call
services for the Fullerton Municipal Airport since 2015.

During this time, we have built excellent relationships with your team and gained knowledge of your
facilities. Our goal is to continue to provide you with high-quality, cost-effective aviation consulting.

Working with the City and Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), we are confident that we will
continue our successful partnership while maintaining
and growing your airport. Our nationally known and
proven aviation consulting practice brings high-level
client dedication and technical skills to manage your
projects from planning through construction. Our
in-house expertise aligns with the types of projects
coming up on your next five-year capital improvement program, and we are prepared to hit the ground running with no learning curve. Critical success factors include our ability to respond quickly to any needs that arise; our outstanding teammates, including seasoned engineers and other experts that are best suited for the needs of each project; FAA relationships and knowledge of FAA standards; knowledge of your facilities; and proven project management, demonstrated by the fact that C&S has served more than 100 airport sponsors in a multi-year consulting capacity.

We value the opportunity to continue serving as your partner and an extension of staff. Please contact me directly if you have any questions or need additional information about our qualifications. We have a vested interest in the continued development of your facilities and look forward to furthering our partnership with your team.

This proposal shall remain valid for a period of no less than 120 days from the date of submittal. I certify that I am an authorized signer on behalf of C&S Engineers, Inc., and I attest that all information submitted with the proposal is true and correct.

Sincerely,
C&S ENGINEERS, INC.

Kenneth Gethers, Jr., PE
Managing Engineer

PROPOSER TO HAVE CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITY
Legal Name C&S Engineers, Inc.

Corporate
Address
2355 Northside Dr., Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
Phone (619) 296-9373
Contact
Person
Ken Gethers, Jr., PE
Managing Engineer
2355 Northside Dr., Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
[email protected] | (619) 819-2279
Subconsultant Teammates
To supplement our in-house experts, we have teamed with five California-based partners who will bring important skills that complement our team.
♦ GGI Surveying & Mapping: Lenny Guyett; 1251
Pomona Road, #101, Corona, CA 92880; (951) 340-0556
♦ Chang Consultants: Wayne Chang; P.O. Box 9496,
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067; (858) 692-0760
♦ Forell | Elsesser Engineers, Inc.: Paul Rodler; 351
California Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104;
(415) 264 8602
♦ Environmental Service Associates: Michael Arnold; 633 West 5th Street, Suite 830, Los Angeles, CA 90071; (407) 312-1294
♦ MTGL, Inc.: Isaac Chun, P.E., G.E.; 7742 Arjons Drive, San Diego, CA 92126; (714) 632-2999 x 2126
Table of
Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving iii Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Section 1
Qualifications & Experience....................................................................................................................................1 Section 2
Proposed Staffing & Organization.................................................................................................................... 22 Section 3
Work Plan............................................................................................................................................................................. 44 Appendix A
Client Testimonials ......................................................................................................................................................... A-1 City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 1 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Table of Contents
Qualifications &
Experience
SECTION 2.1
SECTION 1
Proposal Overview
Relevant Experience
C&S brings nearly 60 years of
experience and a portfolio of over
2,500 airport projects, serving more
than 220 airports ranging from small
general aviation facilities to large
commercial hubs. Few firms can
match the depth and breadth
of our aviation expertise,
with a dedicated team of
more than 120 professionals
focused exclusively on airport
projects, including licensed engineers,
registered architects, planners, and
environmental specialists well-versed in
FAA standards, Advisory Circulars, and
Airport Improvement Plan (AIP) funding
requirements. In California alone, C&S
has served nearly 60 airports and partnered with more
than 25 counties, cities, and airport sponsors over the past decade. Engagements include on-call contracts
supporting clients such as Los Angeles County, San
Bernardino County, and the City of Hawthorne. The
projects in this statement of qualifications illustrate just a portion of our valuable experience on similar on-call contracts, all conducted in accordance with applicable
FAA and state-level agency regulations.

Project Understanding
The City of Fullerton is seeking a qualified team to
serve as its on-call aviation consultant for a five-year period, supporting the full lifecycle of projects within the Fullerton Municipal Airport Capital Improvement
Plan (ACIP). The scope is organized across four primary service areas:

Architecture and Engineering—Priority projects
include:
♦ South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and
Markings Rehabilitation: Approximately 150,000
square feet of pavement rehabilitation, including
markings.
♦ Southeast Hangar Rehabilitation (Phases 1 and
2): Structural, roofing, and electrical upgrades to
existing hangar facilities.

Planning—The City requires Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
updates to reflect planned improvements and land use
changes, as well as master planning support. The scope
also includes feasibility studies for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) infrastructure.

Environmental—The team must be capable of
preparing both National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
documentation, identifying environmental constraints,
and conducting noise and wildlife studies. Given the
airport’s location, CEQA compliance and coordination
with state and local regulatory agencies will be a
consistent thread across nearly every project.

Administrative and Support Services—The consultant
team will be responsible for FAA grant administration,
financial reporting, program management, and bidding
and procurement support. Maintaining FAA compliance
and funding eligibility is imperative.

AVIATION
STAFF
Airports Served
Nationwide
100+
220+
Nearly 30 Years of
Experience in California

TERMINAL/HANGAR

PROJECTS
Airfield Rehabs
125+
120+
41 Employees
60 Airports
Served in
California
CA
Regional
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 2 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Project Approach
Having served Fullerton Municipal Airport since 2015,
C&S brings an unmatched understanding of the
airport’s physical infrastructure, operational constraints, FAA relationships, and ACIP history. This continuity
eliminates the learning curve associated with a new
consultant and allows our team to mobilize quickly on
priority projects.

We structure our on-call contracts around a single
point of accountability. Your project manager, Kenneth
Gethers, Jr., PE, will coordinate all subconsultant
disciplines so the City receives seamless, coordinated
deliverables rather than managing multiple
independent contracts. This model has been proven
across long-term, on-call relationships with Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, and San Diego County.

C&S has extensive experience managing construction
phasing within operating airports. For the South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and Markings Rehabilitation
and Southeast Hangar Rehabilitation projects, the team
will develop detailed construction safety and phasing
plans (CSPPs) that maintain FAA-required safety areas,
protect tenant operations, and sequence work to
minimize disruption.

Our dedicated grant administration staff has deep
familiarity with FAA AIP processes, including grant
applications, reimbursement requests, labor compliance
oversight, and grant closeout documentation. Our
track record of securing and administering FAA funding
positions C&S to maximize the City’s federal funding
eligibility.

For every project requiring environmental review,
C&S will conduct early-stage environmental screening
to identify the appropriate level of documentation
(Categorical Exclusion, Environmental Assessment, or full Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact
Report) and coordinate proactively with the FAA Los
Angeles Airports District Office (ADO) and applicable
state and local agencies. Our California-specific CEQA
experience includes work at Palo Alto, Livermore, San
Carlos, and multiple San Diego County airports.

C&S will approach AAM/UAM feasibility planning by
evaluating existing electrical infrastructure capacity, identifying candidate vertiport sites consistent with FAA design guidance, and assessing land use compatibility.

This work will be integrated into the ALP update
process to position the airport for future federal and
state funding opportunities tied to emerging aviation
technology.

Ultimately, C&S’s California-based team structure
supports rapid response to the City’s needs. Work
orders will be scoped, negotiated, and executed
efficiently, with clear communication protocols and
regular progress reporting to keep the City informed
and in control of its ACIP budget and schedule.

Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 3 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Firm Background
Founded in 1968, C&S is a nationally recognized
leader in airport architectural, engineering,
planning, environmental, and construction
management services, with a legacy spanning
more than five decades and a portfolio of over
2,500 airport projects nationwide. Our experience
is rooted in a deep understanding of the technical,
regulatory, and operational complexities unique
to aviation environments. We have served as a
trusted partner to more than 220 airports, ranging
from general aviation facilities to large commercial
hubs and military installations, providing the
full spectrum of services required for successful
airport development and operations. With a
focus on quality, we work toward the common goal of building, protecting, enhancing, and maintaining our clients’ assets.

With staff dedicated to airfield and landside engineering, sustainability, grants administration, facilities design, environmental compliance, construction management, and program administration, we have the necessary resources to support Fullerton Municipal Airport across planning, design, and delivery under a single, integrated umbrella.

C&S has served as Fullerton Municipal Airport's on-call aviation consultant since 2015 and has completed numerous projects during this 16-year partnership.

Firm Size
C&S is a medium-sized consulting firm of 629 employees, with more than 120 staff members focused 100% on aviation projects.

California Office Locations
C&S’s personnel serve our clients from our 19 offices nationwide, including two offices in California. It is anticipated that all the work for projects related to Fullerton Municipal Airport will be managed from our San Diego office with support from staff in our Sacramento office location.

San Diego
2355 Northside Dr., Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
Phone: (619) 296-9373
Fax: (619) 292-0344
Sacramento
7801 Folsom Blvd.

Suite 210 (Box 20)
Sacramento, CA 95826
Phone: (916) 364-1470
C&S Engineers, Inc. (C&S) is
one of the C&S Companies.

Legal Name
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 4 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Performance Record
Airport services have been the cornerstone of our professional practice since our founding. Over the past decade, we have worked with nearly 60 California airports ranging from general aviation to small commercial service to large hub facilities. Many of our airport projects are conducted as part of on-call contracts.

C&S has established a strong record of past performance with both public and private agencies, consistently delivering high-quality, on-time, and on-budget services across a wide range of aviation and infrastructure projects.

Our reputation is built on repeat business, demonstrating our ability to exceed expectations and foster long-term partnerships.

Throughout California, C&S has successfully partnered with over 25 counties, cities, and airport sponsors on aviation planning, environmental, architectural, engineering, and construction management projects. Our experience includes work with California agencies such as Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Sonoma County, Sacramento County, San Mateo County, Amador County, and Merced County, as well as the cities of Hawthorne, Palo Alto, Livermore, Chico, and Salinas, and airport sponsors including the Monterey Peninsula Airport District, the March Inland Port Airport Authority, and the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. Through these engagements, our team has developed a strong understanding of California public agency processes, stakeholder coordination, and regulatory requirements relevant to county-operated airports.

C&S currently serves as the on-call or airport consultant for over 30 sponsors, including Los Angeles County,
Riverside County, City of Hawthorne, and March Inland
Port Airport Authority, which are all aviation systems
similar to those of the City of Fullerton.

Nationwide, we have successfully completed more than 300 separate airport planning, environmental, architecture, design, and construction projects during the past five years and well over 2,500 over our 58 years serving airport clients.

Our commitment to client service and collaboration is reflected in feedback from our partners as noted from San Mateo County below:
“C&S Companies will listen to our concerns and research an issue before getting back to us promptly with suggestions and strategies, even if it doesn't have to do with the project at hand. We feel that they are a valuable asset to the County and appreciate their creativity. They really are a great pleasure to work with and they set the bar high for others to follow.” C&S has received numerous awards and professional recognition from organizations such as the Asphalt Pavement Association, American Public Works Association, the American Council of Engineering Companies, and the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, including accolades for aviation and infrastructure projects nationwide. These recognitions reflect our commitment to technical excellence, innovation, and client service.

Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 5 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Experience in Similar Advisory Services
Our team is highly experienced working collaboratively with municipal staff in an airport environment and maintaining productive relationships with FAA officials at both regional and national levels. We routinely coordinate with FAA planning, environmental, and programming staff to ensure projects move efficiently through review and approval processes while meeting all regulatory requirements. This familiarity allows us to support municipal staff in navigating FAA coordination, maintaining project schedules, and delivering successful outcomes for airport sponsors.

C&S has extensive experience delivering airport projects that mirror Fullerton Municipal Airport's anticipated needs, from airfield pavement rehabilitation and lighting/signage upgrades to hangar and general aviation terminal improvements; drainage and utility upgrades; access and parking projects; and associated planning, environmental, and construction-phase services. We have supported general aviation reliever airports, small commercial service airports, and large hub facilities, giving us a strong understanding of how to scale solutions, phasing, and stakeholder coordination to airports of varying size and complexity.

Across our architectural/engineering practice, we routinely provide design for runways, taxiways, aprons, aircraft parking, hangars, terminal and support facilities, airfield electrical systems, and associated landside infrastructure.

Our environmental/planning teams regularly lead NEPA and CEQA documentation, ALP updates, master planning, noise and wildlife studies, and permitting for airport improvements, while our construction management/inspection staff oversee airfield and landside construction in active operational environments with a strong focus on safety, phasing, and quality control.

The C&S team knows how to navigate FAA and other agency involvement in pavement management studies; land use and economics evaluations; grant/funding processes; and the integration of innovative systems associated with UAM/AAM, electrification, and other sustainability and resilience strategies. We are accustomed to working under FAA AIP funding requirements, tight construction windows, and agency-driven milestone dates, and we bring proven processes for coordinating with airport sponsors, FAA, state aviation agencies, and other stakeholders to keep projects moving efficiently from planning through construction.

This integrated experience has been developed and refined through long-term, multi-task on-call relationships with airports across the country, where we have consistently met or exceeded quality, schedule, and budget expectations.

Over 80% of our airport projects come from repeat clients, many of whom have extended our on-call contracts for
multiple years based on our proven delivery.

The following pages highlight a selection of representative project examples that demonstrate the depth and breadth of experience C&S brings to Fullerton Municipal Airport’s capital improvement initiatives. These projects showcase our proven ability to deliver high-quality results on complex airport assignments, including airfield rehabilitation, terminal upgrades, environmental compliance, and infrastructure improvements. Each example underscores our commitment to meeting client goals for quality, schedule, and budget, as well as our expertise in navigating regulatory requirements and collaborating with public agencies.

Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 6 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Airport Terminal Expansion
City of Fullerton | Fullerton, California
The City of Fullerton selected
C&S to render programming and
bridging documentation design
services for a general aviation
terminal expansion at Fullerton
Municipal Airport. The project will
consist of modernization features
for the existing terminal building
along with an expansion and several
necessary site improvements. The
key to this design was to keep the
unique Fullerton style intact while
maintaining the future growth and
expansion of the airport.

C&S led the programming efforts
and developed a basis of design in
order for bridging documents to
be used for RFP. The City will then
create an RFQ/RFP process and
select a design builder to design
and construct the facility. C&S
will then assist in design builder
selection and assure compliance
with FAA procurement requirements.

The City has also considered C&S
for both construction management
of the proposed project and the
initial study efforts.

C&S prepared the CEQA
documentation for this project and
obtained a Negative Declaration.

Contact:

Brendan O'Reilly
Airport Manager
(714) 461-1126
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 7 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Tower Upgrades
City of Fullerton | Fullerton, California
The Fullerton Municipal Airport
Tower Upgrade Project involves
comprehensive improvements
to the airport terminal's publicfacing facilities, with a focus on functionality, accessibility, and user
experience.

The project scope includes
modernization of the terminal
lobby through installation of new
carpeting, upgraded drinking
fountains, refreshed interior finishes,
and re-sealing of existing windows
to enhance energy efficiency and
occupant comfort.

Restroom upgrades consist of
accessibility-driven improvements to
meet current ADA standards. Work
includes reconfiguration of existing
layouts, removal of outdated
fixtures, and construction of a fully
compliant accessible stall, resulting
in improved usability and code
compliance.

The project was successfully
delivered on schedule and under
budget, demonstrating effective
project management, cost
control, and coordination with
the City and stakeholders. These
improvements support the City's
capital improvement program by
extending facility life, enhancing
the visitor experience, and ensuring
compliance with current standards.

Contact:

Brendan O'Reilly
Airport Manager
(714) 738-3325
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 8 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport The Taxiway G Realignment and
Apron Expansion project was
initiated by the March Joint Powers
Authority to enhance airfield safety
and operational efficiency, and to
accommodate increased aircraft
traffic at March Air Reserve Base.

The project involved the realignment
of Taxiway G and the replacement of
the adjacent aircraft parking apron
to support both military and civilian
aviation operations.

C&S was retained as the prime
consultant to provide design and
engineering services, including
geometric realignment of Taxiway
G to meet FAA Advisory Circular
150/5300-13B Standards, apron
expansion to increase aircraft
parking capacity and improve
ground maneuverability; pavement
design for both flexible and rigid
surfaces, subgrade stabilization and
drainage improvements; airfield
lighting and signage upgrades,
including LED taxiway edge lights
and new guidance signs; stormwater
management improvements and
environmental compliance review
and coordination with FAA and local
agencies.

Key features include realignment
of approximately 1,200 linear feet
of Taxiway G, the addition of new
apron pavement, installation of
FAA-compliant taxiway lighting and
signage, integration with existing
airfield geometry and operations
and coordination with military and
civilian stakeholders to minimize
operational disruptions.

Construction of Taxiway G includes
removal of existing concrete
pavement and subbase materials
and installation of pavement, with
concrete pours scheduled in phases
to minimize disruption to ongoing
airfield operations.

The project is being managed with
a focus on minimizing operational
disruptions, maintaining airfield
safety through phased construction
and clear communication with
air traffic control, as well as
environmental compliance,
including dust control, stormwater
runoff management, and noise
mitigation.

Construction was completed in
October 2025.

Taxiway G Realignment
and Apron Expansion
March Joint Powers Authority | Riverside County, California Contact:

Dr. Grace Martin
Chief Executive Officer
(951) 656-7000
[email protected]

TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA

TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA

TSA TSA TSA TSA

TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA

TOFA TOFA

TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA

TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA TSA
TOFA

TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA TOFA

X X X X X X
X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X
X X

X X X X X
X X
G G

X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X
X
SMH
TOFA
TOFA
TOFA

TSA TSA TSA TSA
X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X
X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X

X X X X X X X X X X X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X
X X
X

TSA TSA TSA

TSA TSA
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 9 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport C&S was selected in 2011, 2016, and
2021 by the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works,
Aviation Division for their five-year
on-call terms. The County operates
Whiteman Airport, Compton/
Woodley Airport, San Gabriel Valley
Airport, Brackett Field Airport, and
General William J. Fox Airfield, which
serve the general aviation needs of
the Los Angeles region. Past projects
include:
♦ Construction of new helipad
parking areas and ground
support access to maximize
efficiency of emergency
operations for Cal Fire’s
Sikorsky Skycrane.
♦ Reconstruction of Runway 6-24
and the taxiway connectors
at General William J. Fox
Airfield, which became the
Aviation Division’s first Envisionverified project.
♦ Reconstruction of Runway
7L-25R and Taxiway A at
Compton/Woodley Airport
♦ Staff augmentation/support for
the Re-envisioning Whiteman
Airport Community Advisory
Committee (CAC), including
environmental resource analysis
and community outreach.
♦ Whiteman Terminal
Office renovations.
♦ Support for developing and
tracking of its airport system
capital improvement program.
♦ Economic impact analysis and
reporting for County-owned
airports.
♦ Development and updates to
the Aviation Sustainability Plan
for the five airports.
♦ Environmental assessment for
relocating Whiteman Airport’s
terminal building.
♦ Preparation of a land
release request for the
Whiteman Airport.
♦ Update of the Exhibit A/
Property Maps for San Gabriel
Valley and Compton/Woodley
Airports.
♦ Development of the Airport
Pavement Management
Program (PMP) at all five
airports.
♦ Reconfiguration of runway end
hold bays to a central hold bay
for Runway 12-30 at Whiteman
Airport.
♦ Pen and ink update to
Whiteman Airport's Airport
Layout Plan.
♦ Assistance with a Categorical
Exclusion for the Reconstruct
South Taxilanes Project and
Aircraft Parking Ramp at William
J. Fox Field Airport.
♦ Design of airfield improvements
at San Gabriel Valley Airport,
including Runway 1-19
rehabilitation and Taxiway A
reconstruction (ongoing).
♦ Apron rehabilitation at San
Gabriel Valley Airport (ongoing).

On-Call Aviation Engineering and Planning
County of Los Angeles | Los Angeles, California
Contact:

Jason Morgan
Assistant Chief, Aviation District
(626) 300-4608
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 10 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Hawthorne Municipal Airport is
classified as a general aviation
airport and is served by one fixed
base operator (FBO), Archer, and
air charter companies; it is adjacent
to SpaceX and is home to over 140
based aircraft. C&S was selected
in 2017 by the City of Hawthorne
to provide design services,
bidding services, construction
administration and observation,
and grant coordination and capital
improvement programming. C&S
also performed the categorical
exclusions for all projects.

C&S has supported the City with the
following projects:
♦ Runway 7-25 rehabilitation
♦ Rehabilitation of Taxiways N & S
and all connector taxiways
♦ Reconstruction of Taxiway S
between Taxiways G and H
♦ Airfield electrical upgrades
(design), including runway and
taxiway edge lights, guidance
signs, distance remaining signs,
vault building equipment, and a
new rotating beacon
On-Call Engineering and Grant
Administration Services
City of Hawthorne | Hawthorne, California
Contact:

Guido Fernandez
Airport Manager
(310) 349-1636
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 11 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport C&S has proudly served the San
Bernardino County Department
of Airports under an on-call
contract from 2020 to 2025,
delivering a wide range of
planning, engineering, design,
and construction management
services across the County’s six
owned airports. Our work has
supported the County’s mission to
enhance safety, efficiency, and user
experience at its aviation facilities.

C&S also performed the categorical
exclusions for all projects.

Projects have included:
♦ Apple Valley Airport (APV)
♦ Runway 18-26 Reconstruction
♦ Terminal Parking Lot
Improvements (2025)
♦ Exterior Café Improvement
(2025)
♦ Wash Rack Installation (2025)
♦ Taxilane Widening (2025)
♦ Detention Basin Design (2025)
♦ Perimeter Fence Enhancements
♦ Land Acquisition Support
♦ Chino Airport (CNO)
♦ Utility Fee Evaluation (2025)
On-Call Airport Engineering,
Architectural and Planning
San Bernardino County | San Bernardino, California
Contact:

Maureen Snelgrove
Assistant Director
(909) 387-8810
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 12 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport C&S was the lead planner, designer
and general contractor for phase
II of the development of northside
corporate hangars and offices for Jet
Center Los Angeles, at Hawthorne
Municipal Airport. The first of
multiple hangars on the northside
included a 150-by-110-foot hangar,
including 2,500 square feet of office
space for actor Harrison Ford. This
hangar will house several aircraft
that are being relocated from Mr.

Ford’s Santa Monica Airport hangar.

The collaboration with the airport,
Mr. Ford, and the design-build team
was extremely important during
the development of this facility. This
required an airspace evaluation
and working with the local FAA
ADO to ensure all development
was clear of transitional surfaces.

The development includes a new
parking lot and corporate hangars
for transient aircraft parking or
future leases.

This project will improve the
northside areas and add facilities to
support continued airport growth.

The new Los Angeles NFL team
development is a driving factor
for relocation of based aircraft to
Hawthorne. The airport’s continued
high demand for private users
attracts media who use the landside
areas to stage. The project’s first
phase was constructed on a
fast-track schedule with private
investment funds and completed

6.4% below budget.

The FBO has a master development
lease with the City of Hawthorne
and intends to invest $12 million for
corporate and retail improvements.

For phase 1, C&S provided civil
engineering, survey, and aircraft
hangar consulting on two large
corporate hangars. We are also
conducting a Part 77 airspace
analysis to determine the maximum
building elevation to meet
transitional clearance requirements.

Corporate Hangar Complex
Hawthorne, LLC | Hawthorne, California
Contact:

Levi Stockton
President
(310) 760-1670
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 13 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport The Gray Butte Runway
Rehabilitation project was a highpriority, 45-day fast-tracked initiative involving the mill and overlay of the
primary runway at General Atomics’
private drone airfield in Adelanto,
CA. With a strict 30-day construction
window from June 1 to June 30,
2025, the project was driven by the
imminent arrival of a major new
client in July for General Atomics—
making timely delivery absolutely
critical.

This project was not only timesensitive but also historically significant as the first Design-Build
aviation runway project jointly
delivered by C&S Engineers and
C&S Tech. C&S Engineers led
the design effort, while C&S Tech
served as the prime contractor.

The C&S Western Pacific team
provided quality assurance and
materials testing, and C&S Tech
led construction observation
and installation—demonstrating
a seamless, cross-disciplinary
collaboration within the C&S family.

Gray Butte Runway Rehab
General Atomics | Adelanto, California
Contact:

Loren Kagan
Project Manager II
(858) 226-0567
[email protected]
The client, General Atomics, expressed their confidence in our team’s performance, stating:
“Hi Ken – Great job today. You met our expectations of
what we asked C&S and that provided a lot of confidence to our team.”
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 14 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Airfield Pavement and Marking Upgrades
Orange County Fire Authority | Fullerton, California
C&S delivered critical airfield
infrastructure improvements for
the Orange County Fire Authority
(OCFA) at Fullerton Municipal
Airport, enhancing pavement
performance, drainage, and FAAcompliant markings within an active aviation environment. C&S also
performed the categorical exclusion
for this project. Pavement durability
and structural capacity were
reinforced to better support aviation
loads, while upgraded electrical
systems and FAA-compliant
markings improved overall airfield
safety. The project supports OCFA's
aviation operations, including
helicopter staging, fueling, and
emergency response readiness. The
project scope included:

Pavement and Site
Improvements
♦ Removal and replacement
of deteriorated asphalt and
concrete pavement
♦ Installation of new pavement
sections (6-inch PCC/AC over
aggregate base)
♦ Subgrade stabilization and
compaction to meet aviation
loading requirements
♦ Precise grading to tie into
existing taxiways/apron areas
Airfield Markings
♦ Installation of FAA-compliant
markings, including:
♦ Taxiway centerlines and
edge markings
♦ Non-movement area
boundary markings
♦ Helicopter parking and
rotorcraft markings
♦ Removal of conflicting and
obsolete pavement markings
Electrical and Airfield Lighting
♦ Installation of new electrical duct
banks and conduit systems
♦ Construction of precast electrical
pull boxes (HS-25 rated)
♦ Upgrades to taxiway edge
lighting with LED fixtures
♦ Integration with existing airfield
systems while maintaining
operations
Fueling Infrastructure
Modifications
♦ Structural modification and
elevation adjustment of existing
fueling vault
♦ Protection and coordination of
active fuel system components
♦ Concrete extension and
reinforcement for long-term
durability
Drainage and Grading
♦ Regrading of the site to improve
drainage performance
♦ Installation of concrete valley
gutters
♦ Adjusted finish grades to
eliminate ponding and improve
runoff
Construction Safety and Phasing
♦ Developed and implemented
FAA-compliant CSPP
♦ Coordinated active airfield
operations, including:
♦ Temporary taxiway closures
(Taxiway B)
♦ Notice to Air Missions
(NOTAM) issuance and daily
coordination with airport
operations
♦ Escort requirements and
controlled access routes
♦ Maintained continuous airfield
functionality throughout
construction
Despite the complexity of working
within an active airfield, the project
team successfully maintained
safe and continuous operations
through careful phasing, strategic
barricading, and close coordination
with airport staff. Challenges related
to moisture-sensitive subgrade soils
were addressed with controlled
construction methods and strict
compaction requirements to ensure
long-term pavement performance.

Existing utility conflicts—including
electrical systems, fuel lines,
and unidentified subsurface
infrastructure—were proactively
managed through detailed
verification and coordinated design,
minimizing risk and avoiding service
disruptions.

Contact:

Julie Samaniego
Construction Project Manager
(714) 573-6480
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 15 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Airport Layout Plan Update
San Diego International Airport | San Diego, California C&S has been providing
ongoing ALP update
services for San Diego
International Airport
since 2021 as the
airport advances a
comprehensive, multi year
modernization program.

The airport is undergoing
significant airside and
landside redevelopment,
including a new terminal,
a reconfigured entrance
roadway, and numerous
supporting infrastructure
improvements. These
projects are being implemented
at one of the most physically
constrained commercial service
airports in the country, requiring
precise planning, continuous
coordination, and an accurate
representation of evolving
conditions.

C&S has worked closely with Airport
Authority staff to maintain an upto-date, FAA-compliant ALP that reflects the cumulative impacts of
these concurrent projects. Work
has included several rounds of
pen and ink revisions coordinated
with the FAA, as well as other
numerous updates to account for
project phasing changes, shifting
priorities, property acquisitions, and
modifications to airport leasing.

Given the limited available land,
close proximity of development
to active airfield facilities, and the
need to maintain full operational
continuity, the ALP update process
required careful consideration of
FAA design standards, airspace
protection surfaces, and long-term
development compatibility.

In parallel, C&S has supported the
airport with ongoing updates to the
FAA Airport Data and Information
Portal (ADIP), coordinating
obstruction removals and airspace
surface updates with the FAA to
ensure the accuracy of protected
surfaces and the removal of legacy
and newly identified obstructions
from the system as obstruction
removal efforts are ongoing.

Throughout the effort, C&S has
coordinated extensively with
airport staff, FAA representatives,
and other planning and design
consultants to ensure the ALP
accurately communicates the “big
picture” of current conditions and
planned development. The work has
continued through multiple contract
renewals and remains ongoing as
San Diego International Airport
progresses implementation of its
modernization program.

Contact:

Ralph Redman
Program Manager | Planning, Noise &
Environment
(619) 400.2464
[email protected]
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 16 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Quality of Work
C&S incorporates an integral and mandatory quality control process throughout the entire design phase of all projects.

This formal process provides the steps necessary to audit the quality of all deliverables and helps monitor specific aspects of the project for consistency with established procedures and technical standards. The most important element of quality control is that project management instills a focus on quality by all team members in daily decisions and efforts. Our control procedures include the preliminary and final review of all concepts, contract plans, layouts, and project reports. These procedures apply the most up-to-date technical information from inside and outside the firm as well as the maintenance of technical files for new projects, processes, and construction techniques. In addition, these procedures provide for the involvement of specialists, as needed, to participate in the review of extraordinary or particularly challenging issues.

Most importantly, C&S holds our teammates accountable for following through on our quality assurance/quality control plans. All teammates are required to obtain peer reviews for their respective contributions to the project. All project participants, including peer reviewers, are required to sign a Quality Review Signoff Form to confirm their adherence to the review process, and to take personal ownership of the quality of their work.

We will keep Fullerton Municipal Airport involved in design reviews and make sure concerns and questions are addressed before finalizing documents. By being proactive, we make every attempt to prevent errors and omissions, including quality control procedures, communication methods, and project documentation.

Ability to Commit Necessary Time and Resources
Our dedicated professionals are skilled at managing multiple assignments and will always be available for the work required on this project. At any point in time, C&S is concurrently advancing over 200 projects, which demonstrates our capacity and that our production standards and systems are in place to execute multiple task orders. With the support of 600+ personnel across the company and further depth within our team, we can begin work immediately and complete projects in a timely fashion. C&S commits to supporting this contract for the length of time required to complete the entire scope of work. No current or anticipated obligations will affect our performance or use of identified personnel.

Because we serve a number of clients as on-call consultants, we have developed an internal approach that ensures we maintain availability to our clients. We understand the nature of on-call assignments and have the flexibility to adapt to project needs when they arise. Your dedicated project manager, Kenneth Gethers, will be available whenever necessary, both via phone and in person. He is supported by an aviation staff of more than 120, ensuring consistent access to professionals in any field required. Upon selection, we will start working on your behalf and will set up times that are convenient to you and your staff to discuss your immediate needs and how we can help you meet the vision you have for your airport.

Individual Qualifications
Our core qualifications include an experienced, aviation-focused staff; reoccurring training offerings; robust quality and safety programs; and deep familiarity with FAA requirements. C&S employs licensed professional engineers, registered architects, planners, environmental specialists, and construction professionals who work primarily in the airport sector, supported by internal QA/QC procedures tailored to FAA and state aviation standards. Our team is well-versed in FAA Advisory Circulars, Orders, and airport regulations, and we routinely apply this knowledge to ACIP development, design documentation, environmental studies, and construction oversight.

Kenneth Gethers, Jr., PE, has 16 years of civil engineering experience with specialized focus on airport design and project management. As a licensed professional engineer, Ken has served as project manager on numerous aviation projects including airfield pavement design, runway rehabilitation, taxiway reconstruction, apron improvements, and airfield lighting systems. His Project Manager Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 17 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport experience encompasses the full project lifecycle from conception through construction, including preparation of contract plans and specifications, coordination with FAA and regulatory agencies, and grant administration support.

His expertise in pavement management programs, utility design, and multi-agency coordination directly supports airport capital improvement planning and implementation. Ken’s portfolio includes work at major hub airports and general aviation facilities, covering demolition projects, hangar facilities, terminal improvements, drainage systems, pavement rehabilitation, and airfield marking/lighting upgrades. He has managed a number of projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport, including the rehabilitation of Runway 6-24 pavement edges, signage and landscape improvements, building and hangar improvements, and terminal expansion, and he serves as the primary point of contact for C&S under the airport's current multi-year consultant contract.

Lance McIntosh, PE, has more than 30 years of airport-focused civil engineering experience.

A licensed professional engineer and service group manager at C&S, Lance has led design, construction administration, and project management on over 200 airport improvement projects, with deep expertise in airfield pavement rehabilitation, geometric and infrastructure design, and phasing plan development. His extensive familiarity with the FAA project development process is demonstrated through hands-on coordination with the FAA and state agencies, as well as preparation of grant applications, reimbursement requests, and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) reporting.

Notable project experience includes serving as project director on a $300 million airside development plan at San Diego International Airport, overseeing runway reconstructions totaling over $300 million at Detroit Metro Airport, and leading a complex environmental and engineering remediation project at Kingman Municipal Airport that earned the ACEC Arizona 2024 Engineering Excellence Grand Award. His combination of technical depth, regulatory fluency, and senior leadership on large-scale capital improvement programs makes him well positioned to oversee Fullerton’s designated capital improvement program work.

Richard Graham, PE, is a principal engineer with 25+ years of design and construction management experience with a strong focus on aviation projects. He has extensive expertise in FAA coordination and grant administration, including grant applications, reimbursements, and direct liaison with the FAA and state agencies. His experience includes airfield infrastructure rehabilitation, hangar development, airfield electrical upgrades, and airport planning work at general aviation airports. Rich has served as the quality control engineer for various projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport, including the rehabilitation of Runway 6-24 pavement edges and OCFA helipads.

Anna Strong, PE, is a licensed professional engineer with 10 years of aviation engineering experience. Her background spans both airside and landside design, with direct experience in airfield pavement rehabilitation (runways, taxiways, and aprons), hangar design and construction, and on-call general consulting for Southern California airports. She has handson familiarity with the FAA project development process, including developing and securing FAA approval for ACIPs. Her project leadership roles across multi-million dollar reconstructions at Detroit Metro, Muskegon County, and March Air Base demonstrate a proven record of managing complex airport capital projects.

Chance McDaniel, PE, is a registered professional engineer with four years of focused aviation engineering experience. He has supported both commercial and general aviation projects spanning airfield geometry layout, pavement design, grading and drainage, and wet utilities. Chance has direct experience managing facility renovations at Fullerton Municipal Airport, and he has also led and contributed to runway and taxiway reconstruction projects at Apple Valley Airport and March Inland Port; conducted pavement management programs using PAVER software at Oceanside Municipal Airport and Los Angeles County airfields; and served as resident engineer for apron reconstruction at Oceanside, overseeing construction compliance, geotechnical testing, and quantity verification.

His familiarity with FAA project development processes, combined with hands-on experience in airfield pavement, hangar facilities, and construction inspection, positions him to effectively support complex aviation infrastructure projects from planning through execution, ensuring compliance, quality, and long-term operational performance.

Principal in Charge
QA/QC
Airfield Engineering
Airfield Engineering
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 18 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Jake Shurer, CM, is a principal consultant with 11 years of aviation industry experience. His work centers on airport planning and airside development, with direct experience leading ALP updates and master plan projects at airports ranging from general aviation facilities to large hub airports, including Salinas Municipal, March Air Reserve Base, and Lehigh Valley International.

Jake has demonstrated familiarity with FAA standards and compliance requirements, and his technical expertise spans airspace and obstruction analysis, taxiway and apron design, airfield geometry studies, and environmental impact reporting. Jake has served as the planning lead for respective airport-related ALP updates at Fullerton Municipal Airport.

Barton Peters, PE, LEED AP, is a senior project engineer with 21 years of professional experience. He has extensive electrical expertise in medium and low voltage power distribution, lighting, fire alarm systems, and emergency and standby power design. Bart served as the electrical lead on the terminal upgrade project at Fullerton Municipal Airport. Additional aviation sector experience includes electrical engineering work on fuel farms, hangar and office buildings, airport vault replacements, and airfield lighting systems at San Diego International Airport, John Wayne Airport, and Moffett AFB.

Patrick Gordon, RA, NCARB, LEED AP, has more than 23 years of architectural experience with a strong foundation in aviation facility projects. His expertise in life safety and ADA compliance evaluations, master planning, and feasibility studies make him well positioned to serve as the architectural lead on this engagement. Patrick served as the architectural lead for the terminal upgrade and Magnolia Hangar improvements at Fullerton Municipal Airport. He has led design and project management efforts as chief architect on airport-specific work including the Riverside County Sheriff’s Hangar, Chandler Municipal Airport Operations Garage, and the Page Municipal Airport Terminal Expansion. His background also includes large-scale facility assessments at Moffett Federal Airfield.

Kara Young has 18 years of aviation-focused environmental and planning experience.

As a NEPA Subject Matter Expert, she has extensive experience preparing and managing environmental assessments and categorical exclusions for airports across the country, including Fullerton Municipal Airport, March Inland Port, and City of Hawthorne and San Bernardino County airports in southern California. She is familiar with the FAA project development process, grant assurances, and federal and state regulatory coordination. Kara also brings specialized capabilities in air quality modeling, noise impact analysis, ALP updates, and master planning and has successfully secured Voluntary Airport Low Emissions (VALE) grant funding for airports nationwide.

Michelle Auge has over 24 years of experience in grant administration. She is thoroughly knowledgeable of program requirements and is very familiar with the FAA grant system. Her expertise includes preparing AIP grant applications, managing Federal Financial Reporting for open grants, and processing reimbursements. Her familiarity with the FAA project development process is demonstrated through her work guiding airport clients across the Western Pacific Region from preliminary design through project closeout. She also supports ACIP preparation annually and maintains working knowledge of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) program requirements.

Sebastian Al-Naif is a resident project representative with eight years of focused aviation construction experience. Sebastian is highly knowledgeable in FAA construction specifications and project administration. Notable project experience includes a $6 million taxiway realignment and apron reconstruction at March Inland Port Airport and a $5 million runway electrical, lighting, and PAPI rehabilitation at Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport.

Electrical Engineering
Architecture
Resident Project
Representative
Environmental
Grants Administration
Planning
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 19 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Subconsultants
C&S has assembled a team of highly qualified subconsultants to provide specialized expertise in support of Fullerton Municipal Airport's capital improvement projects:

GGI Surveying & Mapping
GGI provides a complete range of survey and mapping services for land development, public works, and the private sector. With state-of-the-art technology and decades of experience, GGI provides highly accurate and costeffective solutions.

Lenny Guyett, PLS, is a professional land surveyor with more than 25 years of experience in the surveying and mapping industry. He has been instrumental in planning, conducting, and overseeing field surveys as part of small- and large-scale airport and public works projects.

Mike Navarro, PLS, has more than 25 years of experience in boundary surveying, mapping, and topographic design surveys. Mike has extensive experience preparing Records of Surveys, Right-of-Way maps, legal descriptions, and easement exhibits, and he has provided mapchecking services to the City of San Bernardino, Los Angeles County, and Orange County.

Chang Consultants
Chang Consultants specializes in water resources and has extensive experience in hydrology, hydraulics, and sedimentation as well as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations and requirements. Expertise includes the analysis and design of storm drain systems, master drainage plans, storm water quality best management practices, floodplains, floodways, channel improvements, channel protection, drop structures, check dams, levees, culverts, bridges as well as detention, retention, and desiltation basins.

Wayne Chang, PE, is a professional engineer with expertise in water resources, hydrology, hydraulics, storm drain analysis and design, and NPDES regulatory compliance. Wayne has performed master drainage plans and analyses specifically for Fullerton Municipal, as well as San Diego International Airport and Sacramento International Airport. He has coordinated projects through federal agencies such as the FAA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

Forell | Elsesser Engineers, Inc.

Forell | Elsesser Structural Engineers, Inc., is a California-based structural engineering firm with more than 65 years of experience providing structural design, evaluation, retrofit, and infrastructure support services for clients including airports and public agencies. Staff routinely supports public sector clients through on-call contracts, providing responsive service, collaborative project delivery, and technical expertise across a range of project types.

Paul Rodler, SE, is a senior principal with 42 years of industry experience. He has completed infrastructure assessments for a 1 million-square-foot United Airlines Maintenance Operations Center at San Francisco International Airport; provided structural and foundation design for a sheriff's helicopter hangar at March Air Reserve Base; and performed structural design, permitting assistance, and construction administration for a Central Receiving and Distribution Center (CRDC) at Sacramento International Airport.

Charlotte Chongpornprasert, SE, is a senior engineer with 15 years of structural engineering experience, including direct work on airport capital improvement projects. Recent aviation projects include renovation work at John Wayne Airport and a sheriff's helicopter hangar at March Air Reserve Base. She has also provided on-call engineering services for Napa County Airport and March Inland Port Airport Authority.

Drainage/SME
Survey
Survey
Structural
Structural
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 20 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Environmental Service Associates (ESA)
ESA is a 100% employee-owned, full-service, multidisciplinary environmental consulting and planning firm with a current staff of over 750 professionals. Since 1969, ESA has prepared thousands of environmental documents for compliance with local, state, and federal regulations, including NEPA and CEQA. They have certified wildlife biologists, archaeologists, air quality and noise specialists, and other technical staff. ESA has provided airport environmental planning and noise services, as well as public engagement and facilitation support, for more than 250 airports throughout the United States (including 42 in California). The firm currently holds active on-call contracts with more than 80 airports.

Autumn Ward, CM, has 21 years of experience in aviation. Her technical expertise spans NEPA and CEQA compliance, aircraft noise analysis, and FAA regulatory requirements. She has completed projects for airports ranging in size from small general aviation airports, including San Bernardino International Airport and Sacramento International Airport, to major large-hub air carrier airports.

David Crook, AICP, LEED AP, is an environmental planner with over 25 years of professional experience in environmental science, impact assessment, planning, and geographic information system (GIS) applications. He is skilled at preparing initial studies (IS) and environmental impact reports (EIR) under CEQA and environmental assessments under NEPA.

He is currently serving as project manager for the San Diego International Airport Terminal 2 East Modernization EIR and recently led an environmental compliance assessment for a new federal inspection facility at Palm Springs International Airport, evaluating environmental effects under both CEQA and NEPA.

MTGL, Inc.

MTGL, Inc. (MTGL) is a family-owned and operated company specializing in geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing, and inspection services. Established in Southern California in 1993, the firm has a long-standing history of providing and delivering geotechnical engineering, materials testing, construction inspection, special inspection, and environmental consulting services. MTGL holds full certifications from numerous agencies to perform materials testing, special inspection, and geotechnical engineering services.

Isaac Chun, PE, GE, is a geotechnical engineer with 34 years of construction industry experience. His expertise spans site investigations, soils and materials testing (including asphalt and concrete), deep foundation inspection, and earthwork remediation. He has served as principal engineer on major airport projects, including the Alaska Airlines LAX T6 Redevelopment and LAX Qantas facilities and has a deep understanding of regulatory requirements at the city, county, state and federal levels, ensuring full compliance across all project phases.

Trevor Carter, PE, is a registered civil engineer with eight years of experience in geotechnical engineering, materials testing and inspection, and civil design and construction. His responsibilities include providing geotechnical engineering analysis, preparing materials test reports, conducting geotechnical site investigations, and performing field observations during foundation excavations and other earthwork operations.

Javier Alvarez-Gallegos has nine years of construction industry experience as a laboratory manager, with expertise in materials testing and quality control. He is highly experienced in geotechnical drilling operations and field density testing, using sand cone and nuclear gauge methods to ensure compliance and integrity on site.

Environmental
Geotech
Geotech
Geotech
Environmental
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 21 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Disciplinary/Investigative Action
C&S does not have any disciplinary or investigative action to disclose.

Litigation Summary
C&S does not have any litigation to disclose.

References
Our clients are the best index for the assessment of our professional abilities. The clients shown on each of our project profiles and below can give you a realistic picture of C&S’s performance, demonstrated quality of work, and ability to meet schedules and budgets. We are proud of the positive and long-lasting relationships we have earned with our clients throughout our years of service. We encourage you to contact our references and talk to them about how C&S has met their needs.

March Inland Port
Grace I. Martin, DPPD
Chief Executive Officer
14205 Meridian Parkway, Suite 140
Riverside, CA 92518
(951) 201-6292
[email protected]
Hawthorne, LLC
Donny Sandusky
General Manager
3753 John J Montgomery Dr.

San Diego, CA 92123
(310) 334-9736
[email protected]
San Bernardino County
Brett Godown
Director of Airports
777 E. Rialto Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92415
(909) 387-8810
[email protected]
Other Services
♦ Sustainability—C&S is the preeminent authority
in aviation sustainability and resilience, helping
airports draw strength from the environment and
communities in which they operate. We work
with clients to establish a cohesive strategy to
integrate sustainability into the organization and
management of their airports. Our team combines
technical expertise with trusted advisory services
and industry leadership, delivering transformative
results and lasting value.
♦ Construction Observation—C&S offers:
♦ Administration of meetings, documentation,
scheduling, and staffing
♦ Full-time resident inspection and overseeing
testing during construction
♦ Production and maintenance of documentation
for FAA and owner throughout construction
♦ As-built and O&M documentation in PDF, CAD,
and GIS format
♦ Construction observation/inspection to ensure
compliance with the contract documents
♦ Final inspections and generation of punch lists
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 22 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Table of Contents
Proposed Staffing &
SECTION 2.1
SECTION 2
Organization
C&S’s responsive team of airport experts is excited to serve the needs of Fullerton Municipal Airport. We have assembled a team of professionals that serve airports similar to yours on a daily basis to better understand your needs and develop timely, cost-effective solutions to your planning, design, and construction needs.

Our proposed team combines C&S's multidisciplinary expertise with the specialized capabilities of our subconsultants—GGI, Chang Consultants, Forell | Elsesser, ESA, and MTGL, Inc.—to deliver comprehensive solutions for Fullerton Municipal Airport’s capital improvement projects. The organizational chart included below illustrates a collaborative structure designed to ensure seamless project delivery, clear communication, and accountability across all disciplines. Together, this integrated team is equipped to address the full range of project needs, leveraging deep local knowledge and proven experience to achieve your goals efficiently and effectively.

Organization Chart
Lance McIntosh, PE
Principal in Charge
Kenneth Gethers, Jr., PE*
Project Manager
2355 Northside Dr., Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92108
Richard Graham, PE
QA/QC
Airfield Engineering
Anna Strong, PE
Chance McDaniel, PE
Planning
Jake Shurer, CM
Grants Administration
Michelle Auge
Resident Project Representative
Sebastian Al-Naif
Electrical
Barton Peters, PE, LEED AP
Architecture
Patrick Gordon, RA, NCARB,

LEED AP
■ C&S
■ GGI Surveying & Mapping
■ Chang Consultants
■ Forell | Elsesser Engineers, Inc.
■ ESA
■ MTGL (W/MBE, DBE)
Survey
Lenny Guyett, PLS
Mike Navarro, PLS
Drainage/SME
Wayne Chang, PE
Structural
Paul Rodler, SE
Charlotte Chongpornprasert, SE
Environmental
Kara Young
Autumn Ward, CM
David Crook, AICP, LEED AP
Geotechnical
Isaac Chun, PE, GE
Trevor Carter, PE
Javier Alvarez-Gallegos
*As project manager under this contract, Kenneth will serve as the single point of contact for the City of Fullerton. He will direct the efforts of the entire team, including subconsultants, and will coordinate directly with your staff. Among the major responsibilities Kenneth will assume are preparing a project work plan, conducting status meetings, providing project status reports, and monitoring the quality review process.

Ken Gethers, Jr., PE
Managing Engineer
Ken Gethers serves as project manager and client manager for airport and site/civil related projects. He works daily with clients, providing consultation on both project and non-project related airport issues, including engineering, planning, land release and development, and grant support. Ken manages projects of various magnitudes and types, coordinating both internally with the team and various subconsultant teammates. He is familiar with governmental regulations and employees, working regularly with both Caltrans and the FAA. responsible for airport and site/civil related design from conception through bidding and construction.

Ken also has experience with engineering design and construction including formulating project technical specifications, drafting contract drawings, and completing related federal and state project forms and documentation.

Experience Multi-Year Consultant Contract Management, Various Locations—Kenneth is the primary point of contact for C&S, representing the client; addressing needs, programming, and prioritizing projects; acting as liaison to the FAA and state agencies; and overseeing grants administration. Clients include Fullerton Municipal Airport, San Bernardino County, City of San Diego, San Mateo County, City of Cloverdale, March Inland Port Authority, and Napa County Airport.

Fullerton Municipal Airport Terminal Expansion, City of Fullerton, CA, Ongoing—Project manager for the terminal programming phase for the City of Fullerton on a future terminal renovation project and expansion. The project will be delivered by way of design build. C&S assisted with bridging document preparation and will lead all construction management on behalf of the City.

Taxiway G and Apron Reconstruction Project, March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside, CA, 2025—Project manager for design and construction administration support for the realignment of Taxiway G, which is immediately adjacent to the airport’s cargo apron.

The realignment consisted of removing approximately 1.8 acres of existing asphalt shoulder pavement and replacing with approximately 2.3 acres of new full strength Portland cement concrete pavement and asphalt shoulder pavement.

Gray Butte Runway Rehabilitation Project, General Atomics, Adelanto, CA, Ongoing— Project manager of the design rehabilitation of the existing runway 8R – 26L and taxiway. This project derived from the Pavement Improvement Program (PIP) study completed prior. Project includes removal of the existing runway asphalt pavement and replacement of a new asphalt overlay section, site grading, installation of LED runway edge lights, wind cone, and marking.

Orange County Fire Authority Apron and Marking Improvement, Fullerton Airport, CA, Ongoing—Project manager for the design of 45,000 square feet of the existing aircraft parking apron. Project includes the addition of two S-70 aircraft parking pads and drainage improvements.

Current Location
San Diego, CA
Proposed Position
Project Manager
Total Experience
16 years
With C&S Since
2010
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering,
Rochester Institute of
Technology, 2010
Registrations
Professional Engineer —
NY
Specialized Training
Confined Spaces for
Entrants, Attendants and
Entry Supervisors, 2011
AutoCAD Civil 3d 2012
Certified Associate
10-hour Occupational Safety
and Health (OSHA), 2012
Site Inspector Representative
Current Assignments
El Mirage Runway Rehab
(20%), Hawthorne
Hangars (10%), March JPA
Fuel Farm Expansion
(10%), Topanga Helipad
(10%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
50%
Richard D. Graham, PE
Principal Engineer
Richard Graham has more than 25 years experience in design and construction management of aviation, public works, and commercial projects. His engineering experience includes everything from initial site investigations, project planning and scope development with sponsors to complete design and budgeting. He has participated in all aspects of construction management projects including grant applications, grant reimbursements, bidding services, construction observation, coordination with the FAA and Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), and project closeout.

Experience Multi-Year Consultant Contract Management, Various Locations— Richard is the contract manager and primary point of contact for C&S and the client, responsible for programming and prioritizing projects, acting as liaison to the FAA and state agencies, and overseeing grants administration. Clients include Page Municipal Airport, Nogales International Airport, Sierra Vista Municipal Airport/Libby Army Airfield, Hawthorne Municipal Airport, Imperial County Airport, and Oceanside Municipal Airport.

East Apron Reconstruction, Oceanside Municipal Airport, Oceanside, CA, Ongoing— Project manager for the design of an apron reconstruction project consisting of milling and replacing asphalt pavement. Included in the project are new pavement markings, tie-down anchors, and chains.

Airfield Pavement Markings Project, John Wayne Airport, Santa Ana, CA, 2026—Project manager for the design of the application of green shoulder markings on Taxiways H, I, J, K, and L as a measure to reduce incursions. Included in the project are partial depth pavement patches along the shoulders of Taxiways K and L.

Runway and Taxiway Resurfacing Project, Hawthorne Municipal Airport, Hawthorne, CA, Ongoing—Project manager for the resurfacing of Runway 7-25, Taxiways N and S, and all connector taxiways that consisted of crack sealing and placing a seal coat. Also included are pavement patches for failing pavement areas and the installation of a trench drain extension to address ponding issues. New pavement markings will be placed after the pavement work is performed.

Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Imperial County Regional Airport, Imperial, CA, 2025—This project consisted of reconstructing the pavements in two separate areas of the airport—Taxiways B4/C5 and the North Apron. Taxiways B4/C5 were reconstructed to the FAA’s new geometry standards that included pavement tapers at curves and intersections. The existing pavement section materials were reused as a subbase layer in the new pavement section to reduce the amount of export on the project.

Terminal Parking Lot Reconstruction Project, Imperial County Regional Airport, Imperial, CA, Ongoing—Project manager for the reconstruction of the parking lot in front of the terminal and airport administration building. The parking lot will be reconfigured to maximize parking spaces and improve access and traffic flow for passenger pickup and drop-off. New mast lighting throughout the parking lot will also be included.

Current Location
Phoenix, AZ
Proposed Position
QA/QC
Total Experience
26 years
With C&S Since
2000
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering,
University of California
at Davis
Registrations
Professional Engineer —

CA, AZ, NM, TX
Current Assignments
Hawthorne Runway and
Taxiway Seal Coat CA/CO
(10%); Oceanside East Apron
Reconstruction (10%) and
Runway Edge Lights, REILs,
and Vault CA/CO (5%); Page
Terminal Bldg. Expansion
CA/CO (15%) and Taxiway A
Reconstruction (5%);
Imperial County Runway
Rehab (5%) and Terminal
Parking Lot Reconstruction
(5%); Nogales Fuel Farm
Replacement CA/CO (5%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
40%
Lance McIntosh, PE
Service Group Manager
Throughout his 30-year career, Lance McIntosh has worked exclusively on airport improvement projects, including geometric design, pavement design, pavement rehabilitation, infrastructure design, and development of complex phasing plans.

He has completed the design and construction administration of more than 300 airport enhancement projects such as runways, taxiways, heliports, and aprons as well as bidding services and engineering studies. Lance also assists sponsors with ACIPs, preparation of grant applications and reimbursement requests, annual reports, DBE reporting, and coordination with FAA and Caltrans. As a consultant, Lance participated in the creation of the California Airports Best Practices Guide, a cooperative effort between airport sponsors, Caltrans, and the FAA to develop a handbook that outlines the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of all affected parties when conducting airport-related business in California.

Experience
Airfield Pavement Improvements Project, John Wayne Airport, Santa Ana, CA, Ongoing—Quality control for the design of various pavement improvement projects around the airfield including crack seal/repair along the shoulders of Runways 2L/2R and 2R/20L; Taxiways G, H, I, J, K, and L; mill and overlay of the Runways 2R and 2L blast pads and north service road; and construction of a concrete cap on the area immediately west of the 2L blast pad, which includes lead paint remediation.

Taxiway B, Hangar Taxilanes, and East/West Apron Pavement Rehabilitation, Hemet Ryan Airport, Hemet, CA, 2025—Project director for the pavement rehabilitation of Taxiway B, hangar taxilanes, and apron. Design work consists of crack repair and seal coat of Taxiway B, reconstruction of eastern apron, and mill and overlay of western apron along with new markings.

Apron Pavement Rehabilitation, French Valley Airport, Murrieta, CA, 2025—Project director for the apron rehabilitation. The scope of work includes demolition and reconstruction of the middle apron, pavement rehabilitation of the north and south apron via crack repair and seal coat, and replacement of existing markings. Design tasks include apron grading, marking layout, and development of plan set and specifications.

Runway and Taxiway Improvements, San Gabriel Valley Airport, El Monte, CA, Ongoing—Project director for the reconstruction of Runway 1-19 and parallel Taxiway A, as well as all entrance/exit taxiway connectors. This project includes designing for updated electrical and evaluation of the existing storm system capacity, as well as remarking new pavements.

Palo Alto Airport Apron Reconstruction, Palo Alto, CA, 2023—Project director for the design and construction administration of approximately 37 acres of apron and taxilane pavement reconstruction. To maintain airport operations, construction was divided into three phases. Improvements included relocating taxilanes, tie-downs, lighting, and a pollution control facility as well as adjusting utilities to grade. Due to challenging Bay Mud subgrade conditions, traditional pavement methods were not feasible. C&S prepared and secured FAA approval for a Modification of Airport Design Standard, allowing use of a cement-treated subgrade. Each phase’s bid package was carefully structured to meet FAA guidelines and maximize funding.

Current Location
Phoenix, AZ
Proposed Position
Principal in Charge
Total Experience
30 years
With C&S Since
1994
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering, Arizona
State University
MBA, Arizona State University
Registrations
Professional Engineer — AZ, MI,
WA
Current Assignments
Monterey Regional Airport Taxiway
A Realignment (10%),
Palo Alto Airport Electrical
Improvements (5%),
San Diego International Airport
Terminal 2 Connector (5%),
City of Phoenix Goodyear Airport
New Apron and
Connector Taxiway (5%),
San Gabriel Valley Airport Runway
and Taxiway Improvements (5%),
General Project Management &
Corporate Duties (45%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
25%
Jake Shurer, CM
Principal Consultant
Jake Shurer is a principal consultant for C&S’s Aviation Group. His airport planning experience includes a range of projects at both general aviation and large hub airports. His responsibilities include developing ALPs, aircraft simulation and gate layouts, airspace and obstruction analysis, aviation site planning, forecasting, and data analysis. His entire career has been focused on aviation, with a large focus on ALPs, airside development projects, and FAA standards compliance.

Experience Airport Layout Plans, Various Airports Nationwide, 2024—Jake has been a part of numerous ALP update projects at his previous firm and with C&S. He has taken part in all stages of the planning, including leading the development of the ALP drawing set, performing airspace analysis, reviewing documents for submittal, and coordinating comments with the client and FAA. He has also developed the aviation demand forecasts, facility requirements, and final ALP narrative reports. Airports include:
♦ San Diego Intl.
♦ Tampa Intl.
♦ LaGuardia
♦ John F. Kennedy Intl.
♦ Lehigh Valley Intl.
♦ Atlantic City Intl.
♦ Northeast Philadelphia
♦ Pittsburgh Intl.
♦ South Jersey Regional
♦ Wilmington
♦ First Flight
♦ Colusa County
♦ Nevada County
♦ Lake Tahoe
♦ Montgomery-Gibbs Executive
♦ Brown Field Municipal
♦ Salinas Municipal
♦ Huron County Memorial
♦ Muskegon County
♦ Whiteman
♦ Castle
♦ St Pete-Clearwater Intl.
♦ Three Rivers Municipal
♦ March Air Reserve Base
♦ San Gabriel Valley
ALP Update Support, San Diego International Airport (SAN), 2022 - Ongoing—Jake is currently serving as both the project manager and task lead for an informal update to the SAN ALP. The Airport is in the process of a major redevelopment project including the construction of a new terminal and relocation of numerous facilities. To keep up with the fluid nature of the project, the ALP has undergone a number of changes to existing conditions, proposed facilities, airspace, and revisions to meet the latest guidance found in FAA AC 150/5300-13B.

Master Plan, March Air Reserve Base (ARB), Riverside, CA, 2025—Deputy project manager for the first ever master plan for the civilian portion of March ARB. This unique airport is mainly used as an Air Force reserve base, with a section reserved for civilian operations and open to the public. This master plan assisted the airport in developing a plan for the limited property available to its highest and best use while remaining within the confines set by the air base. Some factors influencing development were the rapidly increasing population of Riverside County, potential for commercial passenger operations, and the massive increase of logistics companies in the nearby area.

Current Location
Cleveland, OH
Proposed Position
Planning
Total Experience
11 years
With C&S Since
2016
Education
B.S., Aeronautics,
Concentration in Air Traffic
Control, Kent State
University, 2014
Certifications
Instrument Rated Private
Pilot, 2011
Remote Pilot, 2022
Certified Member AAAE,
2015
Current Assignments
City of San Diego
As-Needed Planning and
Environmental (20%),
Findlay Airport Master
Plan Update (50%),
Orlando-Sanford Airport
ALP Update (10%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
20%
Anna Strong, PE
Project Engineer
Anna Strong is a project engineer and client manager with design and consulting experience in landside and airside aviation projects. Her skill set includes grading and drainage design, utility design, stormwater analysis, specification writing, and construction administration. Anna is an experienced user of AutoCAD Civil 3D and is familiar with working with FAA and local requirements to guide technical design. She is experienced in collaborating with diverse trades on multidisciplinary facility projects as well as coordinating with various agencies during the design and permitting process of facility and airside aviation projects.

Experience Anna serves as the deputy client manager and design engineer on various oncall/general consultant contracts for clients in Southern California. In this role, Anna assists in guiding clients through developing and obtaining FAA approval for their ACIPs and serves as a resource to guide clients through the technical aspects of ongoing projects at their airports.

Los Angeles County, CA, 2023-Present—Contract manager, project manager, and technical support for various projects on various engineering design and construction projects. Task orders include:
♦ San Gabriel Valley Runway and Taxiway Airfield Improvements ♦ San Gabriel Valley Apron Pavement Repairs Project
♦ Whiteman Airport Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Amendment ♦ William J. Fox Field Reconstruct South Taxilanes and Aircraft Parking Ramp ♦ Whiteman Airport Runway and Taxiway Rehabilitation
Imperial County, CA, 2023-Present—Contract manager, project manager, and technical support for various projects on various engineering design and construction projects. Task orders include:
♦ San Gabriel Valley Runway and Taxiway Airfield Improvements ♦ San Gabriel Valley Apron Pavement Repairs Project
♦ Whiteman Airport Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Amendment ♦ William J. Fox Field Reconstruct South Taxilanes and Aircraft Parking Ramp ♦ Whiteman Airport Runway and Taxiway Rehabilitation
Taxiway G and Apron Reconstruction Project, March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside, CA, 2025—Project engineer for the design of the realignment of Taxiway G, immediately adjacent to the airport’s cargo apron. The realignment consisted of removing approximately 1.8 acres of existing asphalt shoulder pavement and replacing with approximately 2.3 acres of new full strength Portland cement concrete pavement and asphalt shoulder pavement. The project also included electrical improvements and new pavement markings, along with continual phasing coordination with the Air Base and cargo tenants at the Airport to result in minimal impact on air traffic operations.

Airfield Pavement Markings Project, John Wayne Airport, Santa Ana, CA, 2026—Project engineer for the design of the application of green shoulder markings on Taxiways H, I, J, K, and L as a measure to reduce aircraft incursions.

Current Location
San Diego, CA
Proposed Position
Airfield Engineering
Total Experience
10 years
With C&S Since
2021
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering
Michigan State University
2015
Registrations
Professional Engineer —
MI
Current Assignments
San Gabriel Valley
Airport Improvements
(30%), William J. Fox
Field Reconstruct South
Taxilanes (20%), March
JPA Fuel Farm
Expansion (15%),
Whiteman Airport
Runway and Taxiway
Rehabilitation (15%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
20%
Chance McDaniel, PE
Project Engineer
Chance McDaniel is an engineer within C&S’s Aviation Group. He has more than four years of experience in landside and airside development for both commercial and municipal airports. Chance’s skillset includes grading and drainage design and construction administration. Responsibilities generally include production of engineering plans, cost estimates, project specifications, and design reports. Chance is also experienced in client relationship management, construction observation, pavement management inspections, and coordination with municipalities.

Experience
Facility Renovation, Fullerton Municipal Airport, Fullerton, CA, 2023—Acted as junior project manager in the redesign of a sidewalk and parking lot adjacent to the remodel of an existing airport facility. Designed the demolition, site layout, proposed utility connections, and site grading. Developed all plan sheets and delivered the project on time. Worked directly with the design architect to ensure constructability and continuity in plan set development.

Taxiway G and Apron Reconstruction Project, March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside, CA, 2025—Design engineer with specific focus on taxiway geometry, grading, and markings for the realignment of Taxiway G and full depth reconstruction of the adjacent apron at March Inland Port. Developed plan sets, specifications, and an overall cost estimate for the project.

Gray Butte Runway Rehabilitation Project, General Atomics, Adelanto, CA, Ongoing— Lead designer for airfield lighting and electrical management. Designed airfield lighting, developed load calculations, and analyzed constant current regulator constraints.

Assisted contractor in airfield electrical constructability.

Riverside County Sheriff’s Hangar Development, March Inland Port, Riverside, CA, Ongoing—Design lead responsible for managing civil subdisciplines and ensuring continuity of design. Designed building pad grading, parking lot geometry, and security fencing. Established erosion control, demolition, and improvement plans.

Runway 18-36 Reconstruction, Apple Valley Airport, CA, 2026—Design engineer with specific focus on runway/taxiway geometry, grading, and markings for the reconstruction of Runway 18-36 and the addition of connector taxiways. Modeled runway through corridor grading and developed earthwork quantities for construction activities. Developed plan sets, specifications, and overall cost estimate for the project.

Taxiway A Extension Programmatic Study, San Diego International Airport, San Diego, CA, 2025—Developed a programmatic level study to analyze the extension of parallel Taxiway A in conjunction with proposed adjacent terminal upgrades. Acted as the primary design engineer responsible for grading, drainage, airfield geometry layout, lighting/signage, and pavement design. Conveyed all information through a detailed study analyzing requirements for detailed design and potential phasing alternatives.

Evaluated potential construction activities and developed an early-stage assumption of construction costs. Coordinated with stakeholders and adjacent project design teams to ensure a deep understanding of project scope and design requirements.

Current Location
San Diego, CA
Proposed Position
Airfield Engineering
Total Experience
4+ Years
With C&S Since
2020
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering, San
Diego State University—
2022
Registrations
Professional Engineer
No. C 99193—
CA
Software Skills
Autodesk Civil 3D
PAVER
Bluebeam Revu
AviPLAN Airside Pro
Current Assignments
San Diego International
Airport T2W Sidewalk and
Crosswalk CA (25%),
Oceanside Municipal Airport
East Apron Design (25%),
March Inland Port
Fuel Farm (15%),
Riverside Sheriff’s Hangar
(15%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
20%
Barton Peters, PE, LEED AP
Senior Project Engineer
Bart Peters has 21 years of experience with electrical engineering design, including medium and low voltage power distribution, lighting, and fire alarm design for campuses and most major building types. He has managed multi-disciplinary teams charged with implementing emergency and standby power system designs, and he has served as the electrical lead on major site, campus, and building construction projects.

Experience Riverside County Sheriff’s Hangar Development, March Inland Port, Riverside, CA, Ongoing—Designed electrical power and lighting for new office and hangar building.

Multilevel with challenging conflict coordination, particularly for high bay lights and structural framing of the pre-engineered metal building (PEMB). Worked with the utility for new infrastructure routing.

Hangar 1 Obstruction Lights, Beacon and Inverter and Controls Systems, Moffett Federal Airfield, Mountain View, CA, 2023—Designed the replacement and backup power with controls for new LED obstruction lights. Coordinated design and construction requirements with base.

Hangar 2 Obstruction Lights and Inverter System, Moffett Federal Airfield, Mountain View, CA, 2023—Evaluated the existing obstruction lights and designed new layout to comply with FAA advisory circular. Tailored a microinverter system with battery backup and text alerts.

Operations Garage, Chandler Municipal Airport, Chandler, CA, Ongoing—Led the power, lighting, and communications design for the new hangar/office building.

Complicated site work in multiple phases. As of April 2026, project is being submitted to the City of Chandler. Working with the utility in a tangential scope to underground all of its local medium voltage distribution.

Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Station Bay Door Replacement, San Diego International Airport, San Diego, CA, 2024-2025—Designed the electrical documents for upsizing the high bay door motors, relocated fire truck charging receptacles, and designed dry contact control panel to integrate the doors with the Westport campuswide emergency system. Coordinated with architect, plumbing, and structural.

Airport Vault Replacement and Generator Design, Half Moon Bay Airport, Half Moon Bay, CA, 2023—Designed a new electrical vault to power existing airfield lighting and to provide capacity for future buildout. Specified all relevant equipment, including transformers and constant current regulators for existing voltage and current-driven circuits. Coordinated increased service size and relocation of Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) service. Designed standby diesel generator to back up all loads served by the vault.

Current Location
San Diego, CA
Proposed Position
Electrical Engineering
Total Experience
21 years
With C&S Since
2019
Education
B.S., Electrical Engineering
California State
Polytechnic University
B.A., Political Science,
Stanford University
Registrations
Professional Engineer —

CA, AZ, NM, TX, ID, LA,
WA
LEED Accredited
Professional
Current Assignments
Sacramento Int’l Bradford
Facility (20%),
Riverside Sheriff’s Hangar
(5%), Office of Mental Health
Reviews (10%), Oceanside
On-Call (20%),
San Diego Int’l Support (5%),
United-San Francisco Int’l
Assignments (5%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
35%
Patrick Gordon, RA, NCARB, LEED AP
Chief Architect
Patrick brings over 23 years of experience in project management, design, construction, and sales. His roles include client management, project architecture, design, and construction administration. He has worked across diverse building types, including light industrial, commercial, liturgical, educational, dormitories, multi-family housing, and custom luxury residential. A LEED Accredited Professional, Patrick is committed to sustainable design inspired by his passion for the outdoors.

Experience
Riverside County Sheriff’s Hangar Development, March Inland Port, Riverside, CA, Ongoing—Chief architect. Emergency Operations Bureau Sheriff’s Aviation contracted C&S for the design of a new 20,000-square-foot hangar on March Air Reserve Base for storage and maintenance of pursuit and surveillance aircraft. Services include design and coordination of all engineering disciplines, permitting, bidding assistance, and construction administration services.

Chandler Municipal Airport Operations Garage & Airplane Observation Area, City of Chandler, AZ, 2024—Architect, programming, and design of a new 6,000-square-foot operations garage to store airfield maintenance vehicle when not in operation. The project also includes site plan layout, landscaping, and parking reconfiguration. The area just south of the new facility will be renovated into an interactive area for aviation enthusiasts to enjoy watching airplanes take off and land from a safe distance.

Page Municipal Airport Terminal Expansion, City of Page, AZ, 2024—Deputy project manager in charge of the consultant design team for the 1,600-square-foot extension of the existing terminal. The project includes a new Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screening area and passenger waiting area as well as a complete redesign of the customer service counters and lobby floor finishes.

Condition Assessment, Moffett Federal Airfield, Mountain View, CA—Chief architect - facility team. Planetary Ventures requested a holistic property condition assessment for the property it leases from NASA at Moffett Federal Airfield (MFA). MFA is roughly 1,000 acres and consists of two historic aircraft hangars, an operating airfield, an operating golf course, and an operating Google bus fleet parking and maintenance facility.

West Campus Facilities Assessment, United Airlines, San Francisco, CA—Architect - facility team member. Visual observation of 15 structures with uses ranging from manufacturing, storage, and operations and maintenance to office space, dining, and medical assistance services. The total area of assessed spaces combined to just under 1.36 million square feet. The information collected was documented and processed to create recommendations for architectural maintenance and enhancements. Life safety and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance evaluations were also completed with recommendations for areas needing improvement.

Current Location
Phoenix, AZ
Proposed Position
Architecture
Total Experience
23 years
With C&S Since
2023
Education
B.A., Architecture, State
University at Buffalo, 2002
Registrations
Registered Architect — AZ, NH
LEED Accredited Professional
Current Assignments
Page Airport ARFF Eligibility
Study (10%), Riverside
Sheriff’s Hangar (4%),
Chandler Airport Airside
Operations Facility (5%), City
of Mesa Sunaire Transitional
Housing for the Homeless
(10%), St. Pete Airport
Terminal Renovation &
Expansion (5%), TECO Skills
Training Center (20%),
Fullerton Airport Magnolia
Hangar Roof Renovations
(1%), City of Casa Grande EV
Charging Stations Design
(5%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
40%
Kara Young
Principal Consultant
Kara Young is a recognized NEPA subject matter expert and environmental planning leader with 18 years of experience preparing environmental documentation for airport development projects in accordance with FAA requirements. She specializes in ensuring compliance with NEPA and state regulatory requirements, serving as project manager and technical lead for numerous environmental assessments, categorical exclusions, and sustainability initiatives. Kara’s expertise includes air quality modeling—developing criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas inventories using FAA and state-mandated models—as well as noise modeling and the preparation of noise contours. Her thoroughness, attention to detail, and collaborative approach have established her as a trusted advisor in the field of environmental compliance and NEPA documentation for aviation and infrastructure projects.

Experience
Environmental Services, Various Airports Nationwide—Kara has successfully completed a number of categorical exclusions and environmental assessments for California airports. Airports include:
♦ Fullerton Municipal
♦ El Dorado County
♦ Castle
♦ Banning Municipal
♦ Reedley Municipal
♦ March Inland Port
♦ San Bernardino County
♦ Cloverdale Municipal
♦ Imperial County
♦ City of Hawthorne
♦ Susanville Municipal
♦ City of Palo Alto
♦ Nevada County
♦ Colusa County
♦ City of Oakdale
♦ Ontario Int’l
♦ Hayward County
♦ Livermore Municipal
♦ Oceanside Municipal
♦ French Valley
♦ San Carlos
♦ San Gabriel
♦ Salinas Municipal
♦ City of Chico
♦ Westover Field
♦ Hemet-Ryan
♦ Jacqueline Cochran Regional
♦ McClellan-Palomar
Taxiway A Shift and Reconstruction, Muskegon County Airport, Muskegon, MI, 2023— NEPA lead for the reconstruction of Taxiway A, a full parallel taxiway serving Runway 6-

24. The project involved relocation and reconstruction of the parallel taxiway to meet the center-to-center separation distance and update taxiway geometry, including the width and fillets, to current FAA design criteria. Responsibilities included development of responses to the Documented CATEX form and coordination with subconsultant partners and FAA related to special purpose law categories. Focus areas included threatened and endangered species and wetlands.

Main Entry and Roof Replacement, Muskegon County Airport, Muskegon, MI, 2023— NEPA lead for the replacement of the roof and reconstruction of a new entryway. The roof was leaking, causing damage to the terminal. Responsibilities included development of responses to the Documented CATEX form. Significant impacts to resources were not present. A key consideration for this effort was an expedited schedule due to a change in funding sources to federal funds.

Current Location
Syracuse, NY
Proposed Position
Environmental
Total Experience
18 years
With C&S Since
2008
Education
B.S., Environmental
Engineering, Syracuse
University, 2008
Software Skills
AEDT
AERMOD

AERSCREEN
MOVES
CalEEMod
ACEIT
AutoDesk Civil 3d
Current Assignments
Bradley International Airport
Perimeter Road Relocation
and Cargo Development EA
(20%), Gerald R. Ford
International Airport NEPA
On-Call (30%), Confidential
Client – Hangar
Redevelopment EA (20%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
30%
Michelle Auge
Senior Program Coordinator
As a senior program coordinator, Michelle assists C&S staff and clients with a variety of tasks. Michelle is responsible for grants administration for our Western Pacific Region airport clients. She also assists project managers with all aspects of a project from preliminary design to the construction phase and project closeout, including putting together subcontracts for subconsultants; ordering and tracking the receipt of utility maps and conflict notices; distributing project bid documents to contractors and plan rooms; preparing bid tabulations; and preparing engineers reports, project specifications, contract documents, and final construction reports. Michelle also reviews contractor certified payrolls for compliance with Davis Bacon and the State of California Department of Industrial Relations wage requirements.

Experience Assists annually in the preparation of ACIPs. Uploads and enters ACIP project data into the ADOT ACIP website for Arizona Airports and the Caltrans Airport IQ System Manager website for California Airports for airport sponsors.

Assists airport sponsors and project managers with the preparation of AIP grant applications for design and/or construction and planning projects and prepares ADOT and Caltrans matching grant requests. Assists airport sponsors and project managers each federal fiscal year with their performance reports and federal financial reporting for open grants. Michelle also prepares the FAA, ADOT, and Caltrans grant reimbursement requests and processes the FAA grant reimbursements electronically through the Department of Transportation’s Delphi e-Invoicing System for several airport sponsors. She assists airport sponsors with final reimbursement requests and completes all required documentation for grant closeout.

Airport sponsors include:
♦ City of Cloverdale, CA
♦ City of Cottonwood, AZ
♦ El Dorado County, CA
♦ Greenlee County, AZ
♦ Imperial County, CA
♦ City of Kingman, AZ
♦ Lake Havasu City, AZ
♦ City of Livermore, CA
♦ Merced County, CA
♦ City of Oakdale, CA
♦ City of Oceanside, CA
♦ City of Page, AZ
♦ City of Palo Alto, CA
♦ City of Reedley, CA
♦ City of Safford, AZ
♦ San Mateo County, CA
♦ Santa Cruz County, AZ
♦ City of Sierra Vista, AZ
♦ City of Susanville, CA
♦ City of Winslow, AZ
♦ Yavapai County, AZ
Current Location
Chino Valley, AZ
Proposed Position
Grants Administration
Total Experience
24 years
With C&S Since
2001
Current Assignments
Multiple Clients – Grant
Support (60%), Multiple
Clients – Project
Support (20%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
20%
Sebastian Al-Naif
Resident Project Representative III
Sebastian Al-Naif has eight years of experience with C&S’s Aviation Group managing construction projects on airfields. He is well versed in FAA construction specifications and airfield operations. He is very skilled in formal project administration, rule and contract enforcement, communication, forward-thinking, budget administration, critical thinking, problem-solving, and executive decisionmaking. He has been a resident project representative on various FAA airfield improvement projects in California, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware.

Experience Taxiway G Realignment/Apron Reconstruction, March Inland Port Airport, Moreno Valley, CA, 2025—Resident project representative III for the full depth reconstruction of 13,000 square yards of concrete pavement. Project tasks included excavation, demolition of existing electrical infrastructure, conversion of demolished concrete into recycled concrete aggregate course, preparation of subgrade, placement of the recycled concrete aggregate base, placement of 5 inches of asphalt base, placement of 16 inches of concrete surface, and apron markings.

Pavement Rehabilitation and Reconstruction, Oakdale Municipal Airport, Oakdale, CA, 2022—Resident project representative III for the reconstruction of approximately 65,000 square feet of apron pavement. This includes removal of the existing structural section, along with additional unclassified excavation down to the required subgrade, before placing the new structural section. A concrete valley gutter will be constructed, and a catch basin raised to accommodate the new grades. Apron striping will be placed per AC standards.

Runway 12-30 Rehabilitation Phase I, Elizabeth Field Airport, Fishers Island, Southold, NY, 2024—Resident project representative III for the rehabilitation of an approximate 1,000-by-100-foot portion of existing Runway 12-30 pavement, initiating at the Runway 30 end. Project tasks included profile-milling, full depth pavement repairs to address cracking, filling remaining cracks, and new asphalt paving and markings. Project improvement limits addressed the full 100 feet of runway width.

Rehabilitation of Runway 10-28, Phase III, Delaware River and Bay Authority, Cape May Airport, Cape May, NJ, 2023—Resident project representative III for rehabilitation of 28,550 square yards of runway and taxiway pavement. Project work includes, but is not limited to, variable depth milling, variable depth true and levelling course and surface course paving, pavement reconstruction, partial depth crack repairs, runway grooving, turf grading, markings, seeding, and mulching.

Rehabilitate Parking Lots at Buildings 203, 17, & 316, Delaware River & Bay Authority, Millville Airport, Millville, NJ, 2022—Resident project representative III for base bid, Additive Alternate No. 1, and Additive Alternate No. 2. Base bid work included milling and pavement overlay, fence removal, and fence installation. Additive Alternate No. 1 work includes pavement removal and full depth pavement placement. Additive Alternate No. 2 work includes excavation, storm structure and storm drain placement, backfilling, paving, and fence work.

Current Location
San Francisco, CA
Proposed Position
Resident project
representative
Total Experience
8 years
With C&S Since
2018
Education
B.S., Major in Construction
Management and Minor
in Business Administration,
Bradley University, 2018
Specialized Training
P-401 Certification
Training
10-Hour OSHA
Construction Safety
Certification
Current Assignments
Hemet Ryan Airport
Pavement Rehab –
Phase 2 (80%), Half
Moon Bay Airport
Electrical Vault and
Emergency Generator
(10%), Palo Alto Airport
AWOS, PAPI, and REILS
(10%)
Availability for
Fullerton Pursuit
100% during construction
administration
www.ggisurvey.com
LENNY GUYETT, P.L.S.

Principal / Field Survey Division
Education & Registrations
Professional Licensed Land Surveyor, 2004 – CA - #7993
Affiliations/Associations/Organizations
California Land Surveyors Association
Professional Experience
Mr. Guyett has over 25 years of experience in the surveying and mapping industry and has been instrumental in planning, conducting or overseeing, as Licensed Surveyor-inCharge, field surveys as part of small and large scale Commercial, Industrial, Airport and Public Works projects.

These survey projects have included conducting and delivering Topographic Design Surveys, Control Surveys, Boundary Surveys, ALTA Land Title Surveys, as well as conducting and providing reports for Settlement Monument Surveys, and preparing calculations and conducting Field Surveys for the Layout of Construction projects.

Because Mr. Guyett’s career was not restricted to field operations, he gained valuable mapping-related experience while working in the office. This experience included preparing Mapping products such as Design Survey Basemaps, ALTA Survey Plats and Subdivision Maps, as well as writing Legal Descriptions for the dedications or vacations of Easement and Rights of Way. This experience has given Mr. Guyett the understanding of what an Engineer or Architect needs from the Surveyor, and uses that experience to assure the field crews conduct surveys that will provide a solid foundation from which the Engineer can base the design.

Mr. Guyett currently serves as Principal in Charge of Field Surveying Operations and has been with GGI since April of 2006.

Current Location
Corona, CA
Proposed Position
Survey
Availability
100%
Years with GGI
20 1251 Pomona Road, Suite 101 – Corona, California, 92880 – tel: (951) 340-0556 1251 Pomona Road, Suite 101 – Corona, California, 92880 – tel: (951) 340-0556 www.ggisurvey.com
MIKE NAVARRO, P.L.S.

Principal / Mapping Division
Education & Registrations
Professional Licensed Land Surveyor, 2002 – CA - #7848
Affiliations/Associations/Organizations
California Land Surveyors Association
Professional Experience
Mr. Navarro has over 25 years of experience, focusing mostly on the property boundary and mapping aspects of the industry. Besides overseeing Boundary Surveys, conducting the analysis of Boundary and Right of Way Survey data for the preparation of Records of Surveys and Right-of-Way maps, and preparation of Subdivision Maps (Tract Maps and Parcel Maps), Mr. Navarro’s experience also includes preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for easements and street dedications, as well as street, easement and street or alley vacations associated with projects, or for the stand-alone needs of utility companies and City or County agencies.

Because of his experience in the Mapping and Subdivision aspects of the industry, Mr.

Navarro has provided Map-Checking services to the cities of Brea, Tustin, Diamond Bar and San Bernardino, as well as the County of Los Angeles and the County of Orange, and currently provides Contract City Surveyor services to the City of El Monte.

Additionally, Mr. Navarro’s experience also includes the planning, oversight and preparation of topographic design surveys for engineering projects, as well as general supervision of field survey crews and office staff working under his supervision.

Mr. Navarro currently serves as Principal in Charge of Mapping Operations and has been with GGI since June of 2008.

Current Location
Corona, CA
Proposed Position
Survey
Availability
100%
Years with GGI
18 WAYNE W. CHANG
Education: BS/1986/Civil Engineering/University of California, Berkeley MS/1988/Civil Engineering/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Registration: 1991/Professional Civil Engineer/California #46548 1998/Professional Civil Engineer/Arizona #32416
Current Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Location:

Proposed Drainage/SME
Position:

Availability: 100%
Years with Firm: 23
Qualifications: Mr. Chang specializes in water resources and has extensive experience in hydrology, hydraulics, and sedimentation as well as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations and requirements. His experience includes the design and analysis of storm drain systems, storm water quality best management practices, floodplains, floodways, channel improvements, channel protection, drop structures, check dams, levees, culverts, bridges as well as detention, retention, and desiltation basins. He is very familiar with the Hydrologic Engineering Center’s HEC-1, HEC-HMS, HEC-2, and HEC-RAS models. He is also very familiar with the Water Surface Pressure Gradient (WSPG), FLUVIAL-12, and Finite Element Surface Water Modeling System (FESWMS) models.

He has processed projects through many local agencies, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Fish & Wildlife Service, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the California Division of Safety of Dams, the State Lands Commission, the California Coastal Commission, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

He has published water resources journal articles, presented conference papers and workshops, provided expert witness testimony, taught both undergraduate and graduate-level courses, taught a water resources review course for the Professional Engineer exam, is a past Vice-Chairman of the Floodplain Management Association, and is on the editorial board of the Journal of Floodplain Management.

Mr. Chang has extensive experience on airport projects, so is familiar with airport operations and FAA regulations. This includes experience at the March Air Force Base, where he prepared a drainage study and Water Quality Management Plan for the Airport Terminal Building at March Inland Port. He also prepared Master Drainage Plans and drainage analyses for the following airports:

March Air Force Base, Apple Valley Airport, Bakersfield Airport, Borrego Airport, Buchanan Field Airport, Burbank Airport, Cloverdale Airport, Colusa County Airport, Compton Airport, Fullerton Airport, Gillespie Airport, Half Moon Bay Airport, Hawthorne Airport, Hollister Airport MDP, Oceanside Airport, Palo Alto Airport, Palomar Airport, Reedley Municipal Airport, Sacramento International Airport, San Diego International Airport, Whiteman Airport Chang
Civil Engineering◦Hydrology◦Hydraulics◦Sedimentation
P.O. Box 9496
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-4496
T: 858.692.0760
F: 858.832.1402
[email protected]
About Paul
Paul has been an integral part of Forell Elsesser since 1986, bringing over three decades of expertise to his role as Senior Principal. With a career dedicated to engineering excellence, Paul’s approach to design is characterized by a rare combination of technical mastery and practical insight. Drawing upon his keen awareness of the challenges inherent in construction, Paul adopts a straightforward approach to every project, ensuring that design solutions are not only innovative but also highly constructible. His commitment to marrying technical sophistication with real-world feasibility has earned him a reputation as a trusted advisor among clients and colleagues alike.

Paul has spearheaded numerous complex projects across a diverse range of sectors. From cutting-edge office buildings and high-technology computer facilities to sensitive data centers, laboratories, museums, aviation, and educational facilities, Paul continues to make an indelible mark on the built environment. As an aviation enthusiast himself, Paul has great knowledge about FAA, airport operation and airfield control.

HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
SFO, United Airlines Maintenance
Operations Center, Infrastructure
Assessments, San Francisco, CA

1.0M sf | Aviation | Various building
assessments including test cells, HVAC
and roof assessments, hangar door repairs,
electrical bus duct replacements, and various
building upgrades.

Sacramento International Airport,
Receiving Facility, Sacramento, CA
5,700 sf | Aviation | Conversion of a
warehouse into a Central Receiving and
Distribution Center (CRDC) supporting
Sacramento International Airport operations.

Scope includes structural design, permitting
assistance, and construction administration
for facility upgrades, including cooler/freezer
buildouts, security improvements, overhead
doors, egress modifications, and support
infrastructure for delivery and distribution
functions.

John Wayne Airport Fire Station Door
Replacement, Santa Ana, CA
Aviation | Structural design for renovations
at John Wayne Airport Fire Station. Work
included new rollup doors, and compressed air
equipment.

Hangar for Riverside Sheriff’s Office, March
Air Reserve Base, CA
19,400 sf | Aviation | Public Agency | The new
hangar is a premanufactured metal building
PEMB that houses 5 sheriff helicopters and
contains a separate steel structure within the
main hangar space that supports the Sheriff’s
operation. F|E provided design for the steel
structure and overall foundation design. F|E
also collaborated with PEMB manufacturer to
provide its foundation support.

LLNL Emergency Operations Center,
Livermore, CA
20,500 sf | Public Agency | Structural design
for this new facility that consolidated LLNL
critical emergency management operations,
including monitoring alarms, emergency
response organization dispatching, program
management, and technical support. The
building is approximately 20,500 square feet
(SF), which includes approximately 8,365
SF of flexible use space. This facility is
designed to survive initial emergency events
and resume operations immediately and
independently for an extended period of time
up to 72 hours without resupply.

Project Role
Principal-in-Charge
Experience
Industry: 42 years
Current Firm: 40 years
Office Location
San Francisco, CA
Education
Master of Science, Structural
Engineering, Stanford
University
Bachelor of Science,
Structural Engineering,
Stanford University
Registrations
California, SE (3425)
California CE (42843)
Professional Activities
SEAONC, Member
EERI, Member
Current Assignments
Evans Building - Seismic
Retrofit CA: 25%
Courage Museum TI: 15%
SLAC Large Scale
Collaboration Center: 15%
CSU Monterey Bay, Taylor
Science and Engineering
Building - 15%
Project Availability
30%

PAUL RODLER SE

SENIOR PRINCIPAL

FORELL ELSESSER
About Charlotte
Charlotte is a licensed structural engineer with 14 years of industry experience. Her expertise spans the development of new buildings and the renovation of existing structures across a wide range of market sectors, including science and technology, life sciences, healthcare, academia, aviation, and office buildings. Charlotte’s portfolio boasts extensive involvement in many government agencies including Department of Energy (DOE) projects, including the successful completion of a new ground-up office building and various renovation projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Her recent aviation projects include renovation work at John Wayne Airport and the new hangar for the Riverside Sheriff’s Office.

In addition to her technical prowess, Charlotte is renowned for her exceptional problemsolving skills, which she brings to every project she undertakes. Her ability to navigate complex challenges with ease and precision makes her a valuable asset to any design team.

Moreover, Charlotte’s effective communication skills enable her to collaborate seamlessly with multidisciplinary teams, fostering a culture of cohesion and efficiency in project execution.

HIGHLIGHTED PROJECTS
Hangar for Riverside Sheriff’s Office, March
Air Reserve Base, CA
19,400 sf | Aviation | Public Agency | The new
hangar is a premanufactured metal building
PEMB that houses 5 sheriff helicopters and
contains a separate steel structure within the
main hangar space that supports the Sheriff’s
operation. F|E provided design for the steel
structure and overall foundation design. F|E
also collaborated with PEMB manufacturer to
provide its foundation support.

Whittier Courthouse Floor Slab Mitigation
88,000 sf | Public Agency | Structural
engineering services to address localized slabon-grade settlement within the original Whittier Courthouse building. The project focuses on
evaluating observed settlement conditions and
developing structural bridging documents to
support repair of affected interior areas while
minimizing disruption to ongoing courthouse
operations.

John Wayne Airport Fire Station Door
Replacement, Santa Ana, CA
Structural design for renovations at John
Wayne Airport Fire Station. Work included new
rollup doors, and compressed air equipment.

Napa County Airport On-Call Services A&E,
Napa, CA
Aviation | Providing on-call architectural,
engineering, environmental, planning,
construction management, and inspection
services for airport capital improvement
projects, including hangar development and
replacement, terminal improvements, roadway
rehabilitation and realignment, parking
facilities, security and access modifications,
demolition, and airport infrastructure upgrades.

March Inland Port Airport Authority On-Call
Services, Moreno Valley, CA
Aviation | Providing on-call engineering
services for airport capital improvement
projects, including planning, design,
constructability review, procurement support,
quality assurance, inspection coordination,
FAA grant administration, construction-phase
support, as-built documentation, and project
closeout services for FAA- and non-FAAfunded airport infrastructure improvements.

Apple Valley Airport Cafe, Apple Valley, CA
Aviation | Renovation and expansion of the
Airport Cafe at Apple Valley Airport. F|E
provided design services during construction.

Project Role
Structural Engineering
Experience
Industry: 15 years
Current Firm: 7 years
Office Location
Los Angeles, CA
Education
Master of Science, Structural
Engineering, UC Berkeley,
Berkeley, CA
Bachelor of Science,
Structural Engineering, UC
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Registrations
California, SE (6360)
California, CE (80002)
Professional Affiliations
SEAONC Member/Former
Co-Chair of Public Outreach
Committee
SEAOSC Member
Current Assignments
HCAI Plancheck and TIs
for UCSF and Stanford
Projects: 50%
Aviation Projects for John
Wayne Airport and Riverside
Sheriff: 30%
Project Availability
20%

CHARLOTTE CHONGPORNPRASERT SE

SENIOR ENGINEER

FORELL ELSESSER
Autumn Ward, CM
Aviation Group Director
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
Autumn has 21 years of experience in the aviation field. She has a strong background in aircraft noise, NEPA and CEQA compliance, and stakeholder engagement and community outreach. Her project experience includes facilities ranging in size from small general aviation airports to major large-hub air carrier airports in the United States and abroad.

She is experienced with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and regulatory requirements and skilled in documenting and presenting the results of technical analyses in a manner that can be clearly understood by the public.

Relevant Experience
Sacramento County Department of Airports and WattEV, Sacramento County [Department of Airports]/WattEV Commercial Charging Center, Sacramento, CA.

Project Director. Autumn is the project director for an Environmental Assessment (EA) for a publicly accessible Electric Vehicle (EV) charging facility to be built on a 110+-acre parcel of land owned by Sacramento International Airport. The facility includes EV charging stations, powered by a new solar array, to serve shippers and transporters as well as public transportation and passenger vehicles. Agency coordination on the EA included Section 7 consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service related to the Giant Garter Snake; Section 106 consultation with the California State Historic Preservation Office for historic resources; consultation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and consultation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Air Resources Board, and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District for air quality.

San Bernardino International Airport Authority (SBIAA), San Bernardino International Airport (SBD) Environmental Assessment (EA) and General Conformity Determination (GCD) for the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, San Bernardino, CA. Project Manager. This project included the development of the Eastgate Air Cargo Facility, a package sorting and distribution center with an air cargo hub that would satisfy an unmet need for large-scale air cargo facilities at the Airport. ESA assisted SBIAA with preparation of an EA and an air quality analysis to support a finding that the Proposed Project conformed to the air quality management plan established in the state implementation plan. Autumn led preparation of the EA and coordination with the SBIAA and FAA. This project was challenged in the 9th Circuit Court and Autumn led the coordination efforts to support FAA and the Department of Justice throughout the legal process.

Inyo County, Bishop Airport (BIH) Multiple NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act Studies, Bishop, CA. Project Director. ESA has prepared two EAs, an Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) and an IS/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for Inyo County, as owner and operator of BIH, located in the Eastern Sierra region of California. An EA and IS/ND was prepared to obtain a Part 139 Airport Operating Certificate and amend Operations Specifications to provide scheduled commercial air passenger service at BIH. An EA and IS/MND was prepared for Runway Safety Area Improvements. ESA will begin a third set of NEPA/CEQA studies for BIH in 2026 related to a new terminal. As Project Director, Autumn provides guidance and oversight throughout the NEPA and CEQA processes.

EDUCATION
MS, Aeronautics
(specialization in
Aviation/Aerospace Safety
Systems), Embry Riddle
Aeronautical University
BS, Aviation Business
Administration, Embry
Riddle Aeronautical
University
21 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
11 years with ESA
Location: Tampa

PROPOSED POSITION
Environmental

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATIONS
Certified Member,
American Association of
Airport Executives, 2012

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Former Board Co-Chair,
Tony Jannus Distinguished
Aviation Society
Former Vice Chair, Florida
Airports Council, Noise
Abatement and
Community Affairs
Committee
Past President, WTS
International – Tampa Bay
Chapter

AVAILABILITY
25%

CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

COMMITMENT
75%
David Crook, AICP, LEED AP
Principal Planner
Environmental Science Associates
esassoc.com
David Crook is an environmental planner with over 25 years of professional experience in environmental science, impact assessment, planning, and geographic information system (GIS) applications. He has prepared all levels of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) studies for a wide variety of public and private development projects, as well as for planning and policy documents such as General Plans, Community Plans, and Specific Plans. He is skilled at managing technical studies as well as preparing Initial Studies (ISs) and Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) under CEQA, and Environmental Assessments (EAs) under NEPA. He also has experience with field inspections including soil, groundwater, and surface water sampling and analysis, and preparation of associated analytical reports. David is an accredited member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Accredited Professional (AP) through the U.S. Green Building Council.

Relevant Experience
San Diego International Airport Terminal 2 East Modernization and Expansion Project EIR (2026-Present), San Diego, CA. Project Manager. ESA is currently preparing an EIR for the replacement of the existing Terminal 2 East building at San Diego International Airport on behalf of the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. The project is a final piece of the overall redevelopment of the airport that was initiated in the Airport Development Plan (ADP), the EIR for which was certified in 2020. ESA will address the impacts of the construction of the new terminal, which would continue to operate throughout the project, thus requiring a detailed evaluation of construction phasing and potential additive effects with nearby ADP project construction and overlapping of project-related construction activities in order to present the most conservative scenario. While the project would increase floor area and the overall size and capacity of the terminal, the number of gates, aircraft operations, and passenger throughput would not change. Key issues to be addressed in the EIR are air quality/health risk, cultural (archaeological) resources, noise, and tribal cultural resources.

Palm Springs International Airport Federal Inspection Facility Feasibility Study (2024-2025), Palm Springs, CA. Project Manager. ESA prepared an Environmental Compliance Assessment on behalf of the City of Palm Springs, which owns and operates the airport, to assess the potential need for future detailed environmental analysis pursuant to NEPA and CEQA associated with the provision of a new U.S. Department of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Federal Inspection Facility at the airport. The Assessment evaluated the potential general environmental effects of the project and associated types of analyses needed to adequately address them in the context of CEQA and NEPA, including three potential options for the facility, including reuse of the existing CBP building on the airport campus for the facility; use of a temporary building within the existing airport property; or include the facility in the buildout of the Airport Master Plan, which was undergoing CEQA and NEPA review under a separate contract.

EDUCATION
MS, City and Regional Planning,
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
BS, Environmental Studies,
University of California,
Santa Barbara
25 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE
15 years with ESA
Location: Los Angeles

PROPOSED POSITION
Environmental

CERTIFICATIONS/

REGISTRATION
American Institute of
Certified Planners (AICP)
#018136, 2002
U.S. Green Building
Council LEED Accredited
Professional, 2007

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
Board Member, Orange
County Association of
Environmental
Professionals, 2008-
Present
Board Member, Orange
County American
Planning Association,
2006-2008
Member, Orange County
American Planning
Association
Member, U.S. Green
Building Council, 2007-
Present

AVAILABILITY
30%

CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

COMMITMENT
70%
ISAAC CHUN, P.E., G.E.

Geotechnical Engineer | Engineering Manager
Isaac is a highly accomplished Geotechnical Engineer and Engineering Manager with 34 years of experience in the construction industry. He leads the delivery of technical services across projects, managing multidisciplinary teams that include technical staff, special inspectors, and field technicians. Isaac is known for ensuring operational excellence, maintaining quality standards, and offering strategic technical guidance throughout all phases of construction and engineering
Isaac's technical expertise spans across a wide range of geotechnical disciplines, including site investigations, pile design, seismic hazard mitigation, slope stability, settlement and seepage analysis, stress mapping, and soil characterization. His construction experience includes specification review and enhancement, earthwork remediation, deep foundation inspection, and advanced ground improvement methods.

He has a deep understanding of regulatory requirements at the city, county, state, and federal levels, ensuring full compliance across all project phases.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

CLUNE CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY
725 S Figueroa St, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Contact:

Nathan Clay
(213) 628-4999
[email protected]
LAX Qantas Lounge
Los Angeles, California
Duration: November 2025 – February 2026
Isaac served as the Principal Engineer during the
project's construction.

MTGL performed this project’s soils, construction
materials testing, and special inspections services.

The scope of work includes testing and inspection of
soil, asphalt, concrete, fabrication, structural steel, anchor bolts, firestopping, and non-destructive
testing (NDT).

CLUNE CONSTRUCTION

COMPANY
725 S Figueroa St, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Contact:

Nathan Clay
(213) 628-4999
[email protected]
LAX Qantas Airlines Hangar
Los Angeles, California
Duration: September 2025 - Ongoing
Isaac served as the Principal Engineer during the
project's construction.

MTGL is performing this project’s soils,
construction materials testing, and special
inspections services. The scope of work includes
the testing and inspection of soil, asphalt,
concrete, fabrication, structural steel, anchor
bolts, firestopping, and non-destructive testing
(NDT).

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.
11001 Aviation Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Contact:

Wayne Flesch
[email protected]
Alaska Airlines LAX T6 Redevelopment
Los Angeles, California
Duration: January 2020 – November 2024
Construction Cost: $230M
Isaac served as the Principal Engineer during the
project's construction.

MTGL performed this project's soils, construction
materials, and special inspection services. The
scope of work included testing and inspection of
soil, concrete, asphalt, structural steel, masonry,
drilled-in anchors, fireproofing, and fabrication.

EXPERIENCE
Years of Experience: 34
Years with MTGL: 16

EDUCATION
 B.S. Civil Engineering
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
LICENSES | CERTIFICATIONS
 State of California Registered
Civil Engineer RCE #59431
 State of California Registered
Geotechnical Engineer,
GE #2649

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Member, American Society of
Civil Engineers
 Member, International Code
Council

CURRENT LOCATION
San Diego, CA

PROPOSED POSITION
Geotechnical

AVAILABILITY
50%

CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

COMMITMENT
50%
TREVOR CARTER, P.E.

Engineering Manager
Trevor has eight years of experience in geotechnical engineering, materials testing, construction, and civil design. His expertise includes supporting various MTGL projects and providing comprehensive geotechnical and materials testing services.

Trevor's role involves providing geotechnical engineering analysis, preparing materials test reports, conducting geotechnical site investigations, and performing field observations during foundation excavations and other earthwork operations. His documentation skills and keen ability to identify and resolve construction challenges have proven invaluable in enhancing project efficiency and effectiveness.

Trevor's experience demonstrates a proactive, efficient approach to project management, making him a valuable asset to any team. His strong communication skills, diligence, and unwavering dedication further enhance his exceptional contributions to project success.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

KLEINFELDER

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
5761 Copley Drive, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92111
Contact:

Michelle Beringhaus
(858) 223-8472
[email protected]
Border to Bayshore Bikeway
San Diego, California
Duration: August 2023 – Ongoing
Construction Cost: $16M
Trevor reviewed daily field reports and test results
and notified the project management team of any
failures or discrepancies in project specifications.

MTGL, Inc. performed testing and inspection of this
project's concrete and soils, construction
materials, and special inspection services.

NEWPORT MESA UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT
2985 Bear Street, Building A,
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Contact:

Joshua Rochelle, Project
Manager
(714) 804-2336
[email protected]
Costa Mesa High School Tennis Courts
Costa Mesa, California
Duration: June 2025 – Ongoing
Construction Cost: $11M
DSA Application No.: 04-124010
Trevor reviewed soil and asphalt lab test results,
met with the project management team, and
reviewed staff daily field reports.

MTGL, Inc. provided QA material sampling, testing,
and inspection of soils, concrete, asphalt,
fabrication, structural steel, masonry, roofing,
post-anchor bolting, fireproofing, and non- destructive testing (NDT).

PALM ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
INC.
7330 Opportunity Road, Suite A
San Diego, CA 92111
Contact:

Nazir Saragoza
(619) 291-1495
[email protected]
Fallbrook Water Line Replacement
Fallbrook, California
Duration: January 2025 – Ongoing
Construction Cost: $3.5M
Trevor assisted technicians in assessing field
conditions, reviewing lab test results for soils and
asphalt, and notifying the project management
team of discrepancies.

MTGL, Inc. performed this project’s soils,
construction materials, and special inspection
services. The scope of work included testing and
inspection of soil, asphalt, and concrete.

EXPERIENCE
Years of Experience: 08
Years with MTGL: 04

EDUCATION
 B.S. Civil Engineering, San
Diego State University; San
Diego, CA
LICENSES | CERTIFICATIONS
 State of California Registered
Civil Engineer RCE #98488
 HAZWOPER 40-Hour
 Nuclear Gauge Safety

CURRENT LOCATION
San Diego, CA

PROPOSED POSITION
Geotechnical

AVAILABILITY
75%

CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

COMMITMENT
25%

JAVIER ALVAREZ-GALLEGOS
Laboratory Manager
With nine years of experience in the construction industry, Javier specializes in inspecting and testing construction materials for various projects, including highways, commercial buildings, public works, schools, and private ventures. He leads quality control efforts both in the field and the laboratory, supervising lab personnel and performing testing on soils, aggregates, concrete, masonry, steel, and asphalt in accordance with ASTM and AASHTO standards.

Javier is also highly experienced in geotechnical drilling operations and field density testing, utilizing both sand cone and nuclear gauge methods to ensure compliance and integrity on-site.

Based in Anaheim, Javier oversees lab inspections and manages proficiency testing for certifications from AASHTO, ASTM, CCRL, DSA, HCAI, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

VANIR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT, INC.
4660 La Jolla Village Dr.,
Suite 200,
San Diego, CA 92122
Contact:

Justin Peters, PM
(909) 531-1251
[email protected]
Orange County Youth Transition Center
Orange, California
Duration: February 2024 – Ongoing
Construction Cost: $75M
Javier oversaw lab testing, ensuring accurate
sampling, compliance testing, and reporting to the
Engineer.

MTGL, Inc. currently provides materials testing and
inspection services, including soils, concrete,
asphalt, structural steel, masonry, welding, postinstalled anchor bolting, and non-destructive testing (NDT).

HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
– CITY OF PALMDALE
1401 Willow Pass Rd, Ste 500
Concord, CA 94529
Contact:

Andrew Beebe
(925) 969-8032
[email protected]
Indian Canyon Drive Bridge Widening Project
Palm Springs, California
Duration: August 2023 – Ongoing
Construction Cost: $75M
Javier managed lab testing, ensuring correct
sampling, compliance testing, and result reporting.

MTGL, Inc. performed this project’s construction
material and special inspection services. The scope
of work included testing and inspection of soils,
asphalt, and concrete, as well as fabrication.

EASTERN MUNICIPAL

WATER DISTRICT
2270 Trumble Road,
Perris, CA 92570
Contact:

Vicky Tautala, Project Manager
(951) 928-3777
[email protected]
San Jacinto Valley Groundwater Treatment
Facility
San Jacinto, California
Duration: June 2024 – Ongoing
Construction Cost: $32M
Javier managed lab testing, ensuring correct
sampling, compliance testing, and result reporting.

MTGL, Inc. performed the construction materials
and special inspection services for this project. The
scope of work included testing and inspection of
soils, asphalt, concrete, structural steel, and
masonry.

EXPERIENCE
Years of Experience: 09
Years with MTGL: 05

EDUCATION
 B.S. Civil Engineering
Universidad Autónoma de
Zacatecas
LICENSES | CERTIFICATIONS
 NICET #157935 Levels I & II
Construction Materials
Testing (Soils (II), Concrete,
Asphalt)
 ACI #02223424
Concrete Field-Testing Grade I
 Caltrans Certified
CT 105, CT 125, CT 201, CT
202, CT 205, CT 216, CT 217,
CT 226, CT 229, CT 504, CT
518, CT 523.1, CT 539, CT
540, CT 543, CT 556, CT 557

CURRENT LOCATION
Anaheim, CA

PROPOSED POSITION
Geotechnical

AVAILABILITY
75%

CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

COMMITMENT
25%
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 44 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Work Plan Table of Contents
SECTION 3
Project Understanding
The City of Fullerton is seeking qualified aviation
consulting services to support implementation of capital improvements identified in the Fullerton Municipal
Airport’s five-year ACIP. These projects require a
multidisciplinary approach encompassing planning,
environmental documentation, engineering design, and
potential construction support, all in compliance with
FAA, state, and local regulatory requirements.

We understand that the City intends to establish on-call professional services agreements over a five-year period to deliver projects such as:
♦ ALP Update
♦ South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and
Markings Rehabilitation (~150,000 square feet)
♦ Southeast Hangars Rehabilitation (Phases 1 & 2)
♦ AAM/UAM Planning and Feasibility Studies
These projects will require close coordination with the FAA Los Angeles ADO and adherence to FAA Advisory
Circulars, including AC 150/5100-14E, and federal grant requirements.

Key Project Drivers and Considerations
Based on the RFQ and our experience with similar
airport programs, we recognize several critical drivers:

1. FAA Compliance and Funding Eligibility
All improvements must satisfy FAA design standards,
environmental requirements, and grant assurances
to secure and maintain federal funding.

2. Phased Implementation within Active Airport
Operations
Projects such as ramp rehabilitation and hangar
upgrades must be designed and constructed while
maintaining safe and continuous airport operations,
minimizing impacts to tenants and users.

3. Asset Preservation and Operational Efficiency
Rehabilitation efforts must extend useful life, improve safety, and enhance operational performance of
existing facilities.

4. Integration of Emerging Aviation Technologies
Planning for AAM/UAM introduces new
infrastructure requirements (e.g., electrical capacity, vertiport concepts, airspace considerations) that
must integrate seamlessly with existing airport
operations.

5. Flexibility Under On-Call Contracting Structure
Given that individual task orders will be issued based
on funding availability, the consultant must provide
scalable staffing, rapid mobilization, and efficient task execution.

6. Stakeholder Coordination
Successful delivery will require coordination among
City staff, FAA, tenants, operators, and regulatory
agencies.

Relevant Project Experience
and Demonstrated Success
at Fullerton Municipal
Airport
Your project manager, Kenneth Gethers, Jr., PE, brings
direct, hands-on experience delivering multiple recent
projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport, providing a
strong understanding of the airport’s operational
constraints, stakeholder expectations, and longterm development goals. Through these efforts, he has successfully led projects that not only improved
infrastructure, but also enhanced day-to-day operations, supported airport staff, and contributed to increased
tenant activity and revenue generation.

A cornerstone example is the Administration Building
Improvements Project, which transformed an aging
facility into a modern, functional administrative
hub. Kenneth led the project from design through
construction, ensuring close coordination with airport
staff and minimizing disruption to ongoing operations.

The upgraded building has significantly improved staff
efficiency, collaboration, and overall working conditions, while also creating a professional environment suitable for tenants and visitors. This investment has already
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 45 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport demonstrated tangible economic benefits, with tenants
such as Flight Test Prep Academy operating out of the
facility—bringing increased aviation activity, visibility, and business to the airport.

In addition to the Administration Building
Improvements, Kenneth has successfully managed
several other key projects at Fullerton Municipal,
including:
♦ Tower Upgrades—Enhanced safety, reliability,
and aesthetics such as lobby carpet improvement,
tower stairway improvements, control tower CAB
window sealing, and exterior and interior painting,
ensuring continued operational integrity of the
airport.
♦ Runway 6 PAPI Upgrade—Improved approach
guidance systems, enhancing pilot safety and
operational efficiency, particularly during lowvisibility conditions. ♦ Runway 6–24 Edge Enhancement Project—
Strengthened airfield safety and visibility through
upgraded lighting and airfield edge delineation.
♦ Southeast Maintenance Hangar
Improvements—Upgraded facilities to better
support maintenance operations and tenant
needs, improving usability by fixing roof leaks.
♦ Signage and Landscape Improvements—
Improved wayfinding, airport identity, and curb
appeal, contributing to a more welcoming
environment for users and visitors.
♦ Tower Exterior Signage—Enhanced facility
visibility and branding, supporting airport
recognition and functionality.
♦ OCFA Helipads—Delivered specialized aviation
facilities meeting operational requirements for
emergency response, strengthening regional
public safety capabilities.

Across these projects, Kenneth has consistently
applied a project management approach that aligns
with the City’s priorities outlined in the ACIP, including maintaining uninterrupted airport operations; ensuring
FAA compliance; and delivering high-quality, costeffective solutions. These efforts directly support the key drivers identified for Fullerton Municipal Airport— operational continuity, asset preservation, stakeholder coordination, and long-term adaptability—while also
positioning the airport to attract new tenants and
aviation-related opportunities.

This proven track record at Fullerton Municipal Airport demonstrates Kenneth's ability to deliver projects that go beyond infrastructure improvements—projects
that actively support airport staff, enhance operational performance, and contribute to sustained economic
growth.

Detailed Work Plan
Our approach is structured around a program-level
delivery framework combined with project-specific
execution for each ACIP element.

1. Program Management & On-Call
Services
We will establish a responsive on-call structure that
ensures efficient delivery of multiple concurrent task
orders.

Key elements include:
♦ Dedicated project manager serving as single point
of contact
♦ Additionally, a deputy project manager will be
assigned to your airport in cases where Kenneth
may be on vacation or unavailable
♦ Task order scoping and rapid kickoff process
♦ Resource allocation aligned with project complexity
and schedule
♦ Monthly progress reporting and budget tracking
♦ FAA coordination support and grant compliance
management
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 46 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport

2. Project Initiation & Scoping
For each assigned task:
♦ Conduct kickoff meeting with City and stakeholders
♦ Confirm scope, schedule, funding constraints, and
deliverables
♦ Review existing documents (ALP, previous studies,
pavement data, utilities, etc.)
♦ Identify regulatory pathways (FAA, CEQA/NEPA,
building permits)
Deliverable
♦ Task order work plan and schedule

3. Planning & Alternatives Analysis (as
applicable)
Particularly relevant to ALP updates and AAM/UAM
studies:
♦ Data collection and existing conditions assessment
♦ Airfield geometry and operational analysis
♦ Demand/capacity evaluation
♦ Alternatives development and evaluation
♦ Utility and infrastructure assessments (e.g., electrical for AAM)
Deliverables:
♦ Technical memoranda
♦ Conceptual layouts
♦ Preferred alternative recommendation

4. Environmental Documentation
We will support environmental compliance in
accordance with CEQA and FAA NEPA requirements:
♦ Environmental constraints identification
♦ Coordination with regulatory/resource agencies
♦ Preparation of appropriate documentation
(Categorical Exclusion, EA, IS/MND, etc.)
♦ Public outreach support (if required)
Deliverable
♦ Approved environmental documentation

5. Engineering Design
a. Preliminary Design (30%)
♦ Develop design criteria and basis of design
♦ Prepare preliminary plans and construction phasing
♦ Cost estimates and constructability review
b. Intermediate Design (60%)
♦ Refine engineering details
♦ Coordination with utilities and stakeholders
♦ Update cost estimates and phasing plans
c. Final Design (90–100%)
♦ Complete plans, specifications, and engineer’s
estimate (PS&E)
♦ FAA compliance review and approval coordination

6. Bidding & Procurement Support
♦ Preparation of bid documents
♦ Assistance with pre-bid meetings
♦ Response to bidder questions and addenda
♦ Bid evaluation and recommendation

7. Construction Administration &
Construction Inspection
♦ Submittal review and RFIs
♦ Construction administration and documentation
♦ Progress meetings and schedule monitoring
♦ Quality assurance and compliance review
♦ Change order evaluation

8. Project-Specific Considerations
South Ramp Rehabilitation
♦ Pavement assessment and rehabilitation design
♦ Tie-down anchor layout and installation
♦ Phasing to maintain aircraft operations
♦ Striping and updated aircraft parking configuration
Southeast Hangars Rehabilitation
♦ Structural and roofing upgrades
♦ Electrical system improvements
♦ Tenant protection and phasing strategy
♦ Safety and access management during construction
ALP Update
♦ FAA coordination for approval
♦ Incorporation of planned improvements and land
use changes
♦ Exhibit A update
AAM/UAM Planning
♦ Feasibility assessment and stakeholder coordination
♦ Charging infrastructure requirements
♦ Conceptual vertiport/landing area planning
♦ Integration with existing airport and landside
circulation
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 47 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport

9. Quality Control/Quality Assurance
(QA/QC)
We will implement a formal QA/QC process including:
♦ Independent technical reviews at each design
milestone
♦ Interdisciplinary coordination checks
♦ FAA compliance verification
♦ Document control procedures

10. Schedule & Cost Control
♦ Development of baseline schedules for each task
order
♦ Regular progress tracking and reporting
♦ Cost estimating at each design phase
♦ Early identification of risks and mitigation strategies

11. Grant Administration
♦ Targeted research
♦ Planning
♦ Grant application preparation
♦ Submission
♦ Post award assistance

12. Communication & Coordination
♦ Regular coordination meetings with City staff
♦ Direct liaison with FAA ADO
♦ Stakeholder outreach as required
♦ Transparent reporting and issue resolution
Ability to Meet Schedules
and Budgets, Providing a
Quality Product
C&S uses a variety of methods to ensure our projects
stay on schedule and within budget. With regard to
financial control, a project work plan is created defining the scope of work, schedule, staffing, and a detailed
breakdown of hours allocated for each project task.

This work plan is distributed to all team members and
is reviewed at all internal progress meetings. Costs
incurred versus allocated budget information is available by task via a computerized cost accounting system.

C&S prepares a detailed project schedule identifying the tasks required to complete a project and the timeframes for completing each task. Through the use of Primavera
and Microsoft scheduling software, our team is able
to monitor progress throughout the project and make
adjustments as required to ensure the overall schedule
objectives are maintained.

Scheduling
Our design schedule is developed as
part of the scope of work that becomes
part of our design contract. We will
work with you to develop a schedule
that meets your goals. The schedule will be
adhered to so bidding and construction of the project
will not be impacted. We frequently monitor the design
schedule, and if it does fall behind, we have the ability to reallocate and focus our resources to maintain the
overall project schedule.

As part of the design process, we will develop a
construction contract time, typically based on calendar days, and this will be a requirement of the construction contract. This process includes working with you to
determine a construction phasing plan that minimizes
impacts to airport operations, but also considers cost
implications and constructability. In many cases, there is a trade-off between airfield operational impacts
and increased construction cost. We can optimize
work areas and phase the construction work so that
reasonable contract time is included in the project that will meet your goals for overall cost.

Prior to construction, we will review the contractor’s
schedule to ensure it is practical. For example, the
contractor may have overlooked an item of work,
miscalculated a production rate, or may not have
accounted for the project phasing and work areas
when developing the schedule. If we determine that
a contractor’s schedule is not practical, we ask them
to revisit the schedule and provide an updated one
prior to notice to proceed. Once the project is under
construction, we will monitor the construction progress on a daily basis and review the schedule at weekly
construction progress meetings. If the contractor falls behind schedule, we require them to
provide a plan to get back on schedule.

Budget Control
We understand that funding for the
City is limited. C&S uses BST, a business
management software, to set up and track
internal budgets. Additionally, project managers are
trained to use an internal spreadsheet, called a 3-line Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 48 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport graph, to measure the project performance. The
graph compares the work completed against the work
planned to determine the current earned value of the
project. At the start of the project, Kenneth will develop a projected forecast baseline based on the anticipated
costs over time as related to the project schedule. The graph spreadsheet will be updated weekly by reviewing
the actual cost to the project tasks as determined in
BST compared to the percent complete for that task.

Kenneth will compare the weekly updates against
the project baseline to determine if the project is on
schedule and on budget. Tracking this weekly will allow Kenneth to make adjustments early and quickly before
any issues arise.

Once the project is under design contract, we verify
the project construction budget during the preliminary
phase based on estimated current construction
costs associated with the scope and anticipated cost
escalations. If the estimated costs are not within the
existing budget, we can perform a value engineering
review to determine areas where cost savings may be
realized to bring the project back within budget. If the cost is still outside of the budget, we will work with you to modify the scope to bring the project back within
budget.

Our designers use industry-specific and local historical costs to develop unit prices. In addition, we consider
cost-influencing factors such as time of bid, construction schedule, availability of labor and materials, and
productivity in evaluating the cost of construction. At each phase of design, quantities will be estimated.

These quantities will be adjusted as the design
progresses to the issue of bid documents.

Once the project is under construction, we can use our
expertise and lessons learned to keep the project within budget. We follow proven processes for construction,
including the use of sophisticated software to complete project record keeping, pay requests, and contract
modifications. Our inspection staff monitors quantities in the field on a daily basis to prevent overruns and
identify potential issues before they arise.

Consultant Team
Coordination
Kenneth will manage coordination of the entire team,
including our subconsultant partners. Before major tasks are initiated, our Project Management Plan (PMP) is
communicated to the project team at an internal kickoff meeting. This conveys major goals and objectives, the
scope of services, schedule for completion of specific
tasks, budgets, design standards, CADD standards,
quality control procedures, communication methods,
and risk management measures. In addition, clear roles
and responsibilities are discussed with the team to
facilitate buy-in.

Background information, including record drawings and
CADD file base mapping, is also distributed. After the
kickoff meeting, the team is unified in our overall goals and process and immediately begins the design.

Regular progress meetings will be conducted with the
full design team. They will include scope, schedule, and budget, outstanding items with responsibility and due
date, peer review and quality control, and any necessary coordination.

Microsoft Teams will be used for collaboration.

Through Teams, we can access, share, and edit Word,
PowerPoint, and Excel files in real time. Additionally, we can share information quickly and easily with the entire project team. We also have the ability through Teams
to call team members and conduct meetings, where
we can share screens to better collaborate without
having to have an in-person meeting. C&S also has the
capability to hold virtual meetings using Zoom as well, if needed. We will also use Workspot, a cloud desktop
platform, to help promote timely and coordinated file
sharing.

Workspot is a great tool that controls team access to
the project CAD/BIM files in one location for both C&S
and all subconsultants. Production personnel for the
various disciplines can be confident that the latest files are in this one location and that if they make a change, the entire team has immediate access to the latest file.

Subconsultant Roles
♦ GGI Surveying & Mapping will provide survey
services
♦ Chang Consultants will provide drainage design
♦ Forell | Elsesser Engineers, Inc. will provide
structural design services
♦ Environmental Service Associates (ESA) will lead
CEQA processes and documentation and provide
specialized environmental support
♦ MTGL, Inc. will provide geotechnical services
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Appendix A
Client Testimonials
A-1
Table of Contents
City of Fullerton | Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services Involving 2 Designated Capital Improvement Program Projects at Fullerton Municipal Airport Our Clients
Say it Best
We had an excellent ACIP meeting yesterday with the FAA. They are very excited about our progress and are looking forward to reviewing the airport master plan and updated ALP which Kenneth had available and we were able to walk through everything. Our backand-forth with the base and delay to ensure that we included everything from appendices on the small runway to incorporating improvements to include new taxiways and expanded taxiway on the base were ALL worth it!
Thank you all so much for hanging in there with me, for being readily available and responsive to any late changes I needed to see on plans. Thank you also for hanging in there with the base with me; I know that was a challenge. BUT WE DID IT!! MIPAA is back on the map and in good standing with the FAA.

Dr. Grace Martin
CEO, March Joint Power Authority
C&S Engineers managed a challenging and dynamic FAA project with exceptional integrity, communication, and technical competence. The entire C&S team promotes a culture of partnering to find the best collective solutions with a project-first approach. C&S did what it took to make the project a success, even if that meant late phone calls in the evening or working through the weekend.

Caleb Reynoldson
Senior Project Manager, Griffith Company
A-

TITLE RATE
Service Group Manager $312.00
Principal Engineer $292.00
Chf Engineer $292.00
Mng Engineer $271.00
Sr. Project Engineer $243.00
Project Engineer $208.00
Engineer $188.00
Staff Engineer $159.00
Chief Designer $177.00
Sr. Designer $156.00
Sr. Program Mgr (Grant Admin) $115.00
Construction Principal $306.00
RPR I $148.00
RPR I (OT Rate) $222.00
RPR II $175.00
RPR II (OT Rate) $263.00
RPR III $185.00
RPR III (OT Rate) $277.00
RPR IV $216.00
C&S ENGINEERS INC. RATE SCHEDULE

EXHIBIT C

CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A : NAIC #
NAME: CONTACT
(A/C, No): FAX
E-MAIL ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext): PHONE

INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A

SUBR WVDADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOS ONLY AUTOS NON-OWNED OWNED SCHEDULED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEE.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH- STATUTE PER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFFLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
10/1/2026
Haylor, Freyer & Coon, Inc.

PO Box 4743
Syracuse NY 13221
Kim Acevedo 315-703-1328 [email protected] CUMIS Insurance Society 10847 CSENGINEER Security National Insurance Company 19879 C&S Engineers, Inc.
499 Col Eileen Collins Blvd
Syracuse, NY 13212-3930
Milford Casualty Insurance Company 26662 Merchants National Insurance Company 12775 Navigators Insurance Company 42307 Phoenix Insurance Co 25623 512681981 A X 1,000,000 X 1,000,000 X 5,000 10,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 X X Y Y 325698 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
2,000,000
A 1,000,000 XY Y 325699 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
A X X 5,000,000 Y Y 325700 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
5,000,000 X
10,000
B
C
X
N
Y SWC1658272
MWC1042097
7/1/2026
7/1/2026
7/1/2027
7/1/2027
X
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
D
E
F
Excess Liability
Excess Liability
Installation Floater
Y
Y Y
Y
Y Y
EXL0003145
NY26EXCZ0Q4BGIV
6607E784520
7/1/2026
7/1/2026
7/1/2026
7/1/2027
7/1/2027
7/1/2027
Per Occ/Agg
Per Occ/Agg
$2,100,000 Limit
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
$2,500 Ded.

Total Excess Limit: $25,000,000
Excess Liability Policy #1000739422, Carrier: Liberty Surplus Insurance Corp., Effective 7/1/2026 - 7/1/2027, $5,000,000 Excess Liability Policy #ELD30091714301, Carrier: Endurance American Specialty, Effective 7/1/2026 - 7/1/2026, $5,000,000 Cyber Policy #F14561389008, Carrier: Ace American Insurance Company, Effective 11/1/2025 - 11/1/2026, $5,000,000 limit; $25,000 Deductible CGC0101 (06/19) Commercial General Liability Enhancement Endorsement See Attached...

THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: FORM TITLE:

ADDITIONAL REMARKS
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page of
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID:

LOC #:

AGENCY

CARRIER NAIC CODE

POLICY NUMBER

NAMED INSURED
EFFECTIVE DATE:

CSENGINEER 1 1
Haylor, Freyer & Coon, Inc.

C&S Engineers, Inc.
499 Col Eileen Collins Blvd
Syracuse, NY 13212-3930
25 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
CG2001 (04/13) Primary and Noncontributory – Other Insurance Condition CG0224 (01/93) 30-Day Notice of Cancellation
CGC0112 NY (06/19) Additional Insured – Automatic – Owners, Lessees or Contractors Endorsement CG2032 (04/13) Additional Insured – Engineers, Architects or Surveyors Not Engaged by the Named Insureds CG2037 (04/13) Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees or Contractors – Completed Operations CG2038 (04/13) Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees or Contractors – Automatic Status for Other Parties When Required in Written Construction Agreement CG2503 (05/09) Designated Construction Project(s) General Aggregate Limit CG2404 (12/19) Waiver of Transfer of Rights of Recovery Against Others to Us (Waiver of Subrogation) CAL0101 (06/19) Commercial Auto Enhancement Endorsement CA0449 (11/16) Primary and Noncontributory – Other Insurance Condition CU6207 NY (09/21) Commercial Liability Umbrella Following Form Endorsement CU2403 (09/00) Waiver of Transfer of Rights of Recovery Against Others to Us CU6208 (09/21) General Aggregate Limit of Insurance Per Designated Project(s) Endorsement CU2240 (09/18) Primary Non-Contributory
CU0204 (12/04) 30-Day Notice of Cancellation
WC000313 (04/84) Waiver of Our Right to Recover From Others Endorsement - New York WC000313 (04/84) Waiver of Our Right to Recover From Others Endorsement - All Other States Employee Dishonesty Coverage: Limit $1,000,000, Federal Insurance Company, Policy #81562536, Effective 11/1/2025 - 11/1/2026 City of Fullerton is an Additional Insured on a primary non-contributory bases per the enclosed forms to the extent provided therein. Waiver of Subrogation applies as required by written agreement per the enclosed forms.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 1 of 12 ends

This endorsement changes the Policy. Please read it carefully. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the Commercial General Liability Coverage Form. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

The Commercial General Liability Coverage Form is amended to include the following additions and extensions of coverage:

A. Alienated Premises Coverage
B. Non Owned Watercraft Extension
C. Property Damage To Borrowed Equipment
D. Property Damage Coverage For Personal Property While In Your Possession E. Property Damage Coverage For Tenants – Real Property F. Damage To Premises Rented To You
G. Contractual Liability Coverage For Personal And Advertising Injury H. Supplementary Payments – Amended
I. Bodily Injury Employee Suits
J. Fellow Employee Coverage
K. Newly Acquired Or Formed Organization
L. Past Partnerships And Joint Ventures
M. Additional Insured
N. Broadened Named Insured
O. Medical Expense Limit
P. Duties In The Event Of Occurrence, Offense, Claim Or Suit - Amended Q. Other Insurance – Fire, Lightning Or Explosion
R. Unintentional Failure To Disclose Hazards
S. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us (Waiver Of Subrogation) T. Two Or More Coverage Parts Or Policies Issued By Us
U. Notice Of Cancellation To Certificate Holders
V. Broadened Contractual Liability – Work Within 50’ Of Railroad Property W. Mental Anguish From “Bodily Injury”
X. Insured Contract – Construction Operations And Municipal Work Y. Property Damage - Amended
Policy Number: 325698

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 2 of 12 ends

SECTION I - COVERAGES
A. Alienated Premises Coverage
SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE A – BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY, 2. Exclusions, j. Damage To Property is amended with the following:

1. The following exception to the exclusion is deleted:

Paragraph (2) of this exclusion does not apply if the premises are “your work” and were never occupied, rented or held for retail by you.

2. This exception is replaced by the following:

Paragraph (2) of this exclusion does not apply if the premises are “your work”.

B. Non Owned Watercraft Extension
SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE A – BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY, 2. Exclusions, g. Aircraft, Auto Or Watercraft, paragraph (2)(a) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:
(a) Less than 52 feet long; and
C. Property Damage To Borrowed Equipment
SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE A – BODILTY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY, 2. Exclusions, j. Damage To Property, paragraph (1) is amended by adding the following:

Paragraphs (3) and (4) of this exclusion do not apply to tools or equipment loaned to you, provided they are not being used to perform operations at the time of the loss.

With respect to “property damage” to borrowed equipment the following additional provisions apply:

1. The most we will pay for “property damage” to borrowed equipment is $100,000 for any and all such losses regardless of the number of:
a. Insureds;
b. Claims or “suits” brought; or
c. Persons or organizations bringing claims or “suits”.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 3 of 12 ends

D. Property Damage Coverage For Personal Property While In Your Possession SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE A – BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY, 2. Exclusions, j. Damage to Property, paragraphs (3) and (4) do not apply to “property damage” to the property of others while in your possession. With respect to the insurance provided by this section of the endorsement, the following provisions apply:

The limit of this coverage is $25,000 per “occurrence” and $25,000 aggregate in any annual policy period starting with the beginning of the policy period in the Declarations, regardless of the number of:
a. Insureds;
b. Claims or “suits” brought; or
c. Person or Organizations bring claims or “suits.

We will pay for damages on your behalf, only to the amount of damages for each “occurrence” on your behalf and applies only to the amount of damages for each “occurrence” which are in excess of a $1,000 deductible.

We may pay any part, or all of the deductible amount, to effect settlement of any claim or “suit” and, upon notification of the action taken, you shall promptly reimburse us for such part of the deductible amount, as has been paid by us.

E. Property Damage Coverage For Tenants – Real Property SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE A – BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY, 2. Exclusions, j. Damage to Property, paragraph (5) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

While under your care, custody or control we will pay for “property damage” to property of others arising out of operations incidental to your business when:
a. Damage is caused by the insured;
b. Damage occurs while in the insured’s possession.

The most we will pay under this provision for loss or damage during the policy period is $25,000 per “occurrence” and $25,000 aggregate in any annual policy period starting with the beginning of the policy period in the Declarations.

We will pay for damages on your behalf, only to the amount of damages for each “occurrence” which are in excess of a $1,000 deductible. The limits of insurance will not be reduced by the application of such deductible amount.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 4 of 12 ends

E. Property Damage Coverage For Tenants – Real Property - continued We may pay any part, or all of the deductible amount, to effect settlement of any claim or “suit” and, upon notification of the action taken, you shall promptly reimburse us for such part of the deductible amount, as has been paid by us.

F. Damage To Premises Rented To You
SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE A – BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY, the last paragraph of 2. Exclusions is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

Exclusions c. through n. do not apply to damage to premises while rented to you or temporarily occupied by you with permission of the owner, caused by:

1. Fire;

2. Explosion

3. Lightning;

4. Smoke resulting from such fire, explosion or lightning; or

5. Water.

A separate limit of insurance applies to this coverage as described in Section III – LIMITS OF INSURANCE.

This insurance does not apply to damage to premises rented to you, or temporarily occupied by you, with permission of the owner caused by:

1. Rupture, bursting, or operation of pressure relief devices;

2. Rupture or bursting due to expansion or swelling of structural components or the contents of any building or structure, caused by or resulting from water;

3. Explosion of steam boilers, steam pipes, steam engines or steam turbines.

SECTION III – LIMITS OF INSURANCE, paragraph 6 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Subject to Paragraph 5. above, the Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit is the most we will pay under Coverage A for the sum of all damages because of "property damage" to premises while rented to you, or temporarily occupied by you with permission of the owner, caused by fire; explosion; lightning; smoke resulting from such fire, explosion or lightning; or water. The Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit will apply at all “property damage” proximately caused by the same “occurrence”, whether such damage results from fire; explosion; lightning; smoke resulting from such fire, explosion, or lightning; or water, or any combination of any of these causes.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 5 of 12 ends

F. Damage To Premises Rented To You - continued
The Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit will be the amount shown on the Declarations for Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit.

SECTION V – DEFINITIONS, 9. “Insured Contract”, paragraph a. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

An “Insured contract” means a contract for a lease of premises. However, that portion of the contract for a lease of premises that indemnifies any person or organization for damage to premises while rented to you, or temporarily occupied by you with permission of the owner, caused by: fire: explosion; lightning; smoke resulting from such fire, explosion, or lightning; or water, is not an “insured contract”.

G. Contractual Liability Coverage For Personal And Advertising Injury

1. SECTION I – COVERAGES, COVERAGE B – PERSONAL AND ADVERTISING INJURY LIABILITY, 2. Exclusions, e. Contractual Liability is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

This insurance does not apply to:
e. Contractual Liability
"Personal and advertising injury" for which the insured has assumed liability in a contract or agreement. This exclusion does not apply to liability for damages:
(1) That the insured would have in the absence of the contract or agreement; or (2) Assumed in a contract or agreement that is an "insured contract", provided the "personal and advertising injury" occurs subsequent to the execution of the contract or agreement. Solely for the purposes of liability assumed in an "insured contract", reasonable attorney fees and necessary litigation expenses incurred by or for a party other than an insured are deemed to be damages because of "personal and advertising injury", provided:
(a) Liability to such party for, or for the cost of, that party's defense has also been assumed in the same "insured contract"; and
(b) Such attorney fees and litigation expenses are for defense of that party against a civil or alternative dispute resolution proceeding in which damages to which this insurance applies are alleged.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 6 of 12 ends

G. Contractual Liability Coverage For Personal And Advertising Injury – continued

2. SECTION V – DEFINITIONS, 9. “Insured contract”, paragraph f. is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:
f. That part of any other contract or agreement pertaining to your business (including an indemnification of a municipality in connection with work performed for a municipality) under which you assume the tort liability of another party to pay for "bodily injury", "property damage", or "personal and advertising injury" to a third person or organization. Tort liability means a liability that would be imposed by law in the absence of any contract or agreement.

Paragraph f. includes that part of any contract or agreement that indemnifies a railroad for "bodily injury", "property damage", or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of construction or demolition operations, within 50 feet of any railroad property and affecting any railroad bridge or trestle, tracks, road-beds, tunnel, underpass or crossing.

However, Paragraph f. does not include that part of any contract or agreement:
(1) That indemnifies an architect, engineer or surveyor for injury or damage arising out of:
(a) Preparing, approving, or failing to prepare or approve, maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications; or (b) Giving directions or instructions, or failing to give them, if that is the primary cause of the injury or damage; or
(2) Under which the insured, if an architect, engineer or surveyor, assumes liability for an injury or damage arising out of the insured's rendering or failure to render professional services, including those listed in (1) above and supervisory, inspection, architectural or engineering activities.

H. Supplementary Payments – Amended
SECTION I – COVERAGES, SUPPLEMENTARY PAYMENTS – COVERAGES A AND B, paragraphs 1.b. and 1.d are amended as follows:
a. The amount we will pay for the cost of bail bond is increased to $2,500 in 1.b.; and b. The amount we will pay for the loss of earnings is increased to $500 a day in 1.d.

SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED
I. Bodily Injury Employee Suits
SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED is amended as follows:
“Bodily injury" as listed in 2.a.(1) does not apply to 2.a.(1)(a) through 2.a.(1)(c).

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 7 of 12 ends

J. Fellow Employee Coverage
SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED, paragraphs 2.a.(1)(a) and 2.a.(1)(b) are deleted and replaced with the following:
(a) To you, to your partners or members (if you are a partnership or joint venture), to your members (if you are a limited liability company), or to your other “volunteer workers” while performing duties related to the conduct of your business;
(b) To the spouse, child, parent, brother or sister of that “volunteer worker” as a consequence of paragraph (1)(a) above.

K. Newly Acquired Or Formed Organization
SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED, paragraph 3.a. is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

Coverage under this provision is afforded until the 180th day after you acquire or form the organization or the end of the policy period, whichever is earlier;
L. Past Partnerships And Joint Ventures
SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED is amended by adding the following:

If you are an insured, as shown in the Declarations, you are an insured for your interest in a partnership or joint venture that ended prior to this policy period. This insurance applies:
a. Only to the extent of your interest in the partnership or joint venture. b. Only if no other similar insurance is available to you for your interest in the joint venture or partnership.

The last paragraph of SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Except as provided in this provision, no person or organization is an insured with respect to the conduct of any current or past partnership, joint venture or limited liability company that is not shown as a Named Insured in the Declarations.

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 8 of 12 ends

M. Additional Insured
SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED is amended by adding the following:

Any person or organization with whom or with which you have agreed in writing in a contract or agreement that such person(s) or organization(s) shall be included as an additional insured on your policy as an additional insured. The contract must be executed before the “bodily injury” or “property damage” occurs or the “personal and advertising injury” offense is committed, to name such person or organization as an additional insured, but only with respect to liability arising out any tenancy operation or use of equipment leased to you by such an additional insured. The following provisions apply to such additional insured:
a. The limits of insurance afforded to the additional insured shall be the limits which you agreed to provide in the written contract, or the limits shown on the Declarations, whichever is less. b. The insurance afforded to the additional insured does not apply to:
i. Any “bodily injury” or “property damage” that occurs, or “personal and advertising injury” caused by an offense which is committed, after you cease to be a tenant in that premises; ii. Liability arising out of any premises for which coverage is excluded by endorsement; or iii. Liability arising out of structural alterations, new construction or demolition operations performed by or on behalf of such additional insured(s).

The insurance afforded to the additional insured is excess over any valid and collectible insurance available to the insured, unless you have agreed in the written contract that this insurance must be primary or non-contributory with such other insurance.

N. Broadened Named Insured
SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED, 1.d. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

The person or organization named in the Declarations, and any organization, other than a partnership, joint venture or limited liability company, of which you maintain ownership or in which you maintain the majority interest on the effective date of the policy. Your “executive officers” and directors are insureds, but only with respect to their duties as your officers or directors. Your stockholders are also insureds, but only with respect to their liability as stockholders. However, coverage for any such additional organization will cease as of the date, if any, during the policy period, that you no longer maintain ownership of, or the majority interest in, such organization.

SECTION III – LIMITS OF INSURANCE

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 9 of 12 ends

O. Medical Expense Limit
SECTION III – LIMITS OF INSURANCE, paragraph 7. is amended by adding the following:

The Medical Expense Limit is the greater of $15,000 or the limit shown on the Declarations page.

SECTION IV – COMMERICAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS
P. Duties In The Event Of Occurrence, Offense, Claim Or Suit - Amended SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 2. Duties In The Event Of Occurrence, Offense, Claim Or Suit, is amended by adding the following:
e. In the event that an insured reports an “occurrence” to the worker’s compensation carrier of the Named Insured, and this “occurrence” later develops into a General Liability claim to which this insurance applies, the failure to report such “occurrence” to us at the time of the “occurrence” shall not be deemed in violation of this condition. You must, however, give us notice as soon as practicable after being made aware that the particular claim is a General Liability claim rather than a Worker’s Compensation claim.
f. Notice of an “occurrence” or of an offense which may result in a claim covered by this Policy, the failure to report such “occurrence” shall not be deemed a violation of this condition unless such “occurrence” or offense becomes known to you, or one of the following if designated by you to give such notice:
(1) Your “executive officers” (if you are a corporation); (2) One of your partners who is an individual (if you are a partnership); (3) One of your managers (if you are a limited liability company); or (4) An “employee” holding a position within the organization, who has administrative responsibilities for insurance or insurance related activities.

However, you or your designated representative must give us notice as soon as practicable after being made aware of that particular claim.
g. Knowledge by any other “employee” of an “occurrence” or offense does not imply that you also have such knowledge.
h. This provision does not apply as respects the specific number of days within which you are required to notify us in writing of the abrupt commencement of a discharge, release or escape of “pollutants” that causes “bodily injury” or “property damage” which may otherwise be covered under this Policy.

Q. Other Insurance – Excess Insurance for Fire, Lightning Or Explosion

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 10 of 12 ends

SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 4. Other Insurance, b. Excess Insurance, paragraph (1)(a)(ii), is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

That is Fire, Lightning or Explosion insurance for premises rented to you or temporarily occupied by you with permission of the owner;
R. Unintentional Failure To Disclose Hazards
SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 6. Representations is amended by adding the following:

Based on our reliance on your representations as to existing hazards, if you unintentionally fail to disclose any such hazards prior to the beginning of the policy period of this coverage part, we shall not deny coverage under this coverage part because of such failure. However, the provision does not affect our right to collect additional premium or to exercise our right of cancellation or nonrenewal in accordance with applicable state insurance laws, codes or regulations.

S. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us (Waiver Of Subrogation) SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us is amended by adding the following:

We waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of premises owned or occupied by or rented or loaned to you; ongoing operations performed by you or on your behalf, done under contract with that person or organization; “your work”; or “your products”. We waive this right where you have agreed to do so as part of a written contract, executed by you before the “bodily injury” or “property damage” occurs or the “personal and advertising injury” offense is committed.

T. Two Or More Coverage Parts Or Policies Issued By Us
SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS is amended to add the following:

If this policy and any other policy issued to an insured by us or any affiliated company provides coverage that applies to the same claim or damages, the maximum applicable limit(s) of liability or limit of insurance under all the policies will not exceed the highest applicable limit of liability or limit of insurance under any one policy. This condition does not apply to any policy issued by us or an affiliated company specifically written to apply as excess insurance over this policy.

U. Notice Of Cancellation To Certificate Holders

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 11 of 12 ends

SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS is amended to add the following:

This policy is subject to the following additional Conditions:

1. If this policy is cancelled by us, other than for nonpayment of premium, notice of such cancellation will be provided at least thirty (30) days in advance of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file with the agent of record or the Company.

2. If this policy is cancelled by us for nonpayment of premium, or by the insured, notice of such cancellation will be provided within (10) days of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file with the agent of record or the Company.

If notice is mailed, proof of mailing to the last known mailing address of the certificate holder(s) on file with the agent of record or the Company will be sufficient proof of notice.

Any notification rights provided by this endorsement apply only to active certificate holder(s) who were issued a certificate of insurance applicable to this Policy's term.

Failure to provide such notice to the certificate holder(s) will not amend or extend the date the cancellation becomes effective, nor will it negate cancellation of the Policy. Failure to send notice shall impose no liability of any kind upon us or our agents or representatives.

SECTION V – DEFINITIONS
V. Broadened Contractual Liability – Work Within 50’ Of Railroad Property SECTION V – DEFINITIONS, 9. “Insured Contract”, c. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Any easement or license agreement in connection with construction or demolition operations on or within 50 feet of a railroad.

W. Mental Anguish From “Bodily Injury”
SECTION V – DEFINITIONS, 3. “Bodily injury” is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:
"Bodily injury” means bodily injury, mental anguish, mental shock, fright, disability, humiliation, sickness or disease sustained by a person, including death resulting from any of these at any time.

X. Insured Contract – Construction Operations And Municipal Work

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 12 of 12 ends

SECTION V – DEFINITIONS, 9. “Insured contract”, paragraph d. is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

An obligation, as required by ordinance, to indemnify a municipality.

Y. Property Damage - Amended
The SECTION V – DEFINITIONS, 17. “Property Damage” is amended to add the following:

That particular part of real property on which you or any contractors or subcontractors working directly or indirectly on your behalf are directly performing operations, if the “property damage” arises out of those operations.

POLICY NUMBER: 325698

POLICY CHANGES
Policy Change
Number : 0

POLICY NUMBER POLICY CHANGES EFFECTIVE COMPANY

NAMED INSURED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Chris Foy

COVERAGE PARTS AFFECTED
General Liability
Bound as Renewal
Add CG0224 1093 30 Day Notice of Cancellation
Name: Blanket as required by written contract
Address: As per list of names and addresses to be provided by the retail broker at time of notice Authorized Representative Signature
POLICY NUMBER: IL 12 01 11 85
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

IL 12 01 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1983 Copyright, ISO Commercial Risk Services, Inc., 1983

Page 1 ends

325698 07/01/2026 Cumis Insurance Society
C&S Engineers Inc. etal
ADDITIONAL INSURED – AUTOMATIC – OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS

ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 12 06 19 NY CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 1 of 6 ends

This endorsement changes the Policy. Please read it carefully. This endorsement modifies the Commercial General Liability Coverage Form. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

A. SECTION II – WHO IS AN INSURED is amended by adding the following:

Any person or organization whom you are required to add as an additional insured under a written contract or written agreement executed by you, is an additional insured but only with respect to liability for “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” and only as described in paragraph (1.,

2., 3. or 4. below, whichever applies:

1. If such written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide that the person or organization be named (added) as an additional insured by the use of:
a. The Insurance Service Office (ISO) Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – (Form B) endorsement CG 20 10 11 85; or
b. One or both of the following endorsements:
(1) ISO Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – Scheduled Person Or Organization endorsement CG 20 10 10 01; or
(2) ISO Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 10 01;
such person or organization is then an additional insured with respect to such endorsement(s), but only to the extent that “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” arises out of:
(a) Your ongoing operations, with respect to paragraph 1.a. or 1.b.(1) above; or (b) “Your work”, with respect to paragraph 1.b.(2) above, which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this paragraph 1., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
i. Only applies if the “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” offense occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement; and Policy Number: 325698
ADDITIONAL INSURED – AUTOMATIC – OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS

ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 12 06 19 NY CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 2 of 6 ends

ii. Does not apply to “bodily injury” or “property damage” caused by “your work” and included within the “products-completed operations hazard” unless the written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide such coverage to such additional insured.

Solely with respect to this paragraph ii., if the written contract or written agreement provides a minimum time period for providing such coverage, and such minimum time period ends prior to the end of the policy period, this insurance shall not apply to “bodily injury”, “property damage” or a “personal and advertising injury” offense which occurs during the policy period and after the end of that minimum time period.

2. If such written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide that the person or organization be named (added) as an additional insured under one or both of the following endorsements:
a. ISO Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – Scheduled Person Or Organization CG 20 10 07 04; or
b. ISO Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – Completed Operations CG 20 37 07 04,
such person or organization is then an additional insured with respect to such endorsement(s), but only to the extent that “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” is caused, in whole or in part, by:
(1) Your acts or omissions; or
(2) The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf, in the performance of:
(a) Your ongoing operations, with respect to paragraph 2.a. above; or (b) “Your work” and included in the “products-completed operations hazard”, with respect to paragraph 2.b. above,
which is the subject of the written contract or written contract.

However, solely with respect to this paragraph 2., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
i. Only applies if the “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” offense occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement; and ADDITIONAL INSURED – AUTOMATIC – OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS

ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 12 06 19 NY CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 3 of 6 ends

ii. Does not apply to “bodily injury” or “property damage” caused by “your work” and included within the “products – competed operations hazard” unless the written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide such coverage to such additional insured.

3. If neither paragraph 1. nor paragraph 2. above apply and such written contract or written agreement requires that you provide that the person or organization be named (added) as an additional insured under the:
a. ISO Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – Scheduled Person Or Organization CG 20 10 04 13,
such person or organization is then an additional insured only to the extent that “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” is caused, in whole or in part by:
(1) Your acts or omissions; or
(2) The acts or omission of those acting on your behalf, in the performance of your ongoing operations, which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this paragraph 3., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
(a) Only applies to the extent permitted by law;
(b) Will not be broader than that which you are required by the written contract or written agreement to provide for such additional insured ; and (c) Only applies if the “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” offense occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement.

4. If neither paragraph 1. nor paragraph 2. above apply and such written contract or written agreement requires that you provide that the person or organization be named (added) as an additional insured under the:

ADDITIONAL INSURED – AUTOMATIC – OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS

ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 12 06 19 NY CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 4 of 6 ends

a. ISO Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors – Completed Operations CG 20 37 04 13,
such person or organization is then an additional insured only to the extent that “bodily injury” or “property damage” is caused, in whole or in part by “your work” and included in the “productscompleted operations hazard”, which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this paragraph 4., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
(1) Only applies to the extent permitted by law;
(2) Will not be broader than that which you are required by the written contract or written agreement to provide for such additional insured;
(3) Only applies if the “bodily injury” or “property damage” occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement; and (4) Does not apply to “bodily injury” or “property damage” caused by “your work” and included within the “products-completed operations hazard” unless the written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide such coverage to such additional insured.

Solely with respect to this paragraph (4), if the written contract or written agreement provides a minimum time period for providing such coverage, and such minimum time period ends prior to the end of the policy period, this insurance shall not apply to “bodily injury” or “property damage” which occurs during the policy period and after the end of the minimum time period.

B. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to any additional insured referenced in Section A. of this endorsement, the following additional exclusion applies:

This insurance does not apply to “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” arising out of the rendering of, or failure to render, any professional architectural, engineering or surveying services including:

1. The preparing, approving or failing to prepare or approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications; or

2. Supervisory, inspection, architectural or engineering activities.

This exclusion applies even if the claims against any insured allege negligence or other wrongdoing in the supervision, hiring, employment, training or monitoring of others by that insured, if the “occurrence” which caused the “bodily injury” or “property damage”, or the offense which caused the “personal and advertising injury”, involved the rendering of or the failure to render any professional architectural, engineering or surveying services.

ADDITIONAL INSURED – AUTOMATIC – OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS

ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 12 06 19 NY CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 5 of 6 ends

C. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to any additional insured referenced in Section A. of this endorsement, the SECTION IV – COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 2.

Duties In The Event Of Occurrence, Offense, Claim Or Suit is amended to add the following:

The additional insured must see to it that:
(1) We are notified as soon as practicable of an “occurrence” or offense that may result in a claim; (2) We receive written notice of a claim or “suit” as soon as practicable; and (3) A request for defense and indemnity of the claim or “suit” will promptly be brought against any policy issued by another insurer under which the additional insured may be an insured in any capacity. The provision does not apply to insurance on which the additional insured is a Named Insured if the written contract or written agreement requires that this coverage be primary and non-contributory.

D. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to any additional insured referenced in Section A. of this endorsement, the SECTION IV – COMMERICAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 4.

Other Insurance is amended to add the following:

Primary And Noncontributory Insurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured provided that:
a. The additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance; and b. You are required by written contract or written agreement that this insurance be primary and not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured.

E. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to any additional insured referenced in Section A. of this endorsement, the SECTION IV – COMMERICAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, 4.

Other Insurance, b. Excess Insurance is amended to add the following:

This insurance is excess over:

Any other valid and collectible insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, available to an additional insured, in which the additional insured on our policy is also covered as an additional insured on another policy providing coverage for the same “occurrence”, offense, claim or “suit”. This provision does not apply to any policy in which the additional insured is a Named Insured on such other policy and where our Policy is required by a written contract or written agreement to provide coverage to the additional insured on primary and non-contributory basis.

F. This endorsement does not apply to an additional insured which has been added to this Coverage Part by an endorsement showing the additional insured in a Schedule of additional insureds, and which endorsement applies specifically to that identified additional insured.

ADDITIONAL INSURED – AUTOMATIC – OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS

ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY
CGC 01 12 06 19 NY CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 6 of 6 ends

G. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to any additional insured referenced in Section A. of this endorsement, the SECTION III – LIMITS OF INSURANCE is amended to add the following:

Additional Insured – Automatic – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors Limit The most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance:

1. Required by the written contract or written agreement referenced in Section A. of this endorsement; or

2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in this Policy; whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in this Policy. –—‘×›« “À”fi¤ŒÊ ÌÓÎÍÁË ›—””¤Œ›×fl‘ Ÿ¤“¤Œfl‘ ‘×flfi×‘×Ã« ›Ÿ Óð ÌÓ ÔÓ ÔÁ
Ãÿ×Õ ¤“‹—ŒÕ¤”¤“Ã ›ÿfl“Ÿ¤Õ Ãÿ¤ –—‘×›«Ú –‘¤flÕ¤ Œ¤fl‹ ×Ã ›flŒ¤⁄À‘‘«Ú ›Ÿ Óð ÌÓ ÔÓ ÔÁ w ×²´Æø²½ª ÕªÆ™·½ª —ºº·½ªÙ ×²½ÚÙ ÓðÔË –ø¹ª Ô ±º Ô ßÜÜ×Ì×ÑÒßÔ ×ÒÍËÎÛÜ ÛÒÙ×ÒÛÛÎÍô ßÎÝØ×ÌÛÝÌÍ ÑÎ
ÕÀŒ ¤«—ŒÕ “—Ã ¤“ŸflŸ¤‹ fi« Ãÿ¤ “fl”¤‹ ×“ÕÀŒ¤‹
Ã¸· ª²º±Æª³ª²¨ ³±º·º·ª ·²´Æø²½ª °Æ±™·ºªº ´²ºªÆ ¨¸ª º±¥¥±©·²¹Ê ›—””¤Œ›×fl‘ Ÿ¤“¤Œfl‘ ‘×flfi×‘×Ã« ›— ¤ŒflŸ¤ –flŒÃ
Õ›ÿ¤‹À‘¤
“ø³ª¯˜ —º flºº·¨·±²ø¥ ×²´Æªº ¤²¹·²ªªÆ¯˜Ù flÆ½¸·¨ª½¨¯˜ —Æ Õ´Æ™ªß±Æ¯˜ “±¨ ¤²¹ø¹ªº fiß Ã¸ª “ø³ªº ×²´ÆªºÊ
fi¥ø²µª¨ ø ŒªØ´·Æªº æß …Æ·¨¨ª² ›±²¨Æø½¨
×²º±Æ³ø¨·±² ÆªØ´·Æªº ¨± ½±³°¥ª¨ª ¨¸· Õ½¸ªº´¥ªÙ ·º ²±¨ ¸±©² øæ±™ªÙ ©·¥¥ æª ¸±©² ·² ¨¸ª ‹ª½¥øÆø¨·±²Ú ßò Í»½¬·±² ×× É¸± × ß² ×²«®»¼ · ø³ª²ºªº ¨±
·²½¥´ºª ø ø² øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº ¨¸ª øÆ½¸·¨ª½¨Ù
ª²¹·²ªªÆ ±Æ ´Æ™ªß±Æ ¸±©² ·² ¨¸ª Õ½¸ªº´¥ªÙ æ´¨
±²¥ß ©·¨¸ Æª°ª½¨ ¨± ¥·øæ·¥·¨ß º±Æ ˛æ±º·¥ß ·²¶´Æß˛Ù
˛°Æ±°ªÆ¨ß ºø³ø¹ª˛ ±Æ ˛°ªÆ±²ø¥ ø²º øº™ªÆ¨··²¹
·²¶´Æß˛ ½ø´ªºÙ ·² ©¸±¥ª ±Æ ·² °øÆ¨Ù æßÊ
ÔÚ «±´Æ ø½¨ ±Æ ±³··±²Â ±Æ
ÓÚ Ã¸ª ø½¨ ±Æ ±³··±² ±º ¨¸±ª ø½¨·²¹ ±² ß±´Æ
æª¸ø¥ºÂ
·² ¨¸ª °ªÆº±Æ³ø²½ª ±º ß±´Æ ±²¹±·²¹ ±°ªÆø¨·±²
°ªÆº±Æ³ªº æß ß±´ ±Æ ±² ß±´Æ æª¸ø¥ºÚ
Õ´½¸ øÆ½¸·¨ª½¨Ù ª²¹·²ªªÆ ±Æ ´Æ™ªß±ÆÙ ©¸·¥ª ²±¨
ª²¹ø¹ªº æß ß±´Ù øÆª ½±²¨Æø½¨´ø¥¥ß ÆªØ´·Æªº ¨± æª
øººªº ø ø² øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº ¨± ß±´Æ °±¥·½ßÚ
ÿ±©ª™ªÆÙ ¨¸ª ·²´Æø²½ª øºº±Æºªº ¨± ´½¸
øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´ÆªºÊ
ÔÚ —²¥ß ø°°¥·ª ¨± ¨¸ª ª®¨ª²¨ °ªÆ³·¨¨ªº æß ¥ø©Â
ø²º
ÓÚ …·¥¥ ²±¨ æª æÆ±øºªÆ ¨¸ø² ¨¸ø¨ ©¸·½¸ ß±´ øÆª
ÆªØ´·Æªº æß ¨¸ª ½±²¨Æø½¨ ±Æ ø¹Æªª³ª²¨ ¨±
°Æ±™·ºª º±Æ ´½¸ øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´ÆªºÚ
fiÚ …·¨¸ Æª°ª½¨ ¨± ¨¸ª ·²´Æø²½ª øºº±Æºªº ¨± ¨¸ªª
øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´ÆªºÙ ¨¸ª º±¥¥±©·²¹ øºº·¨·±²ø¥
ª®½¥´·±² ø°°¥·ªÊ
Ã¸· ·²´Æø²½ª º±ª ²±¨ ø°°¥ß ¨± ˛æ±º·¥ß ·²¶´Æß˛Ù
˛°Æ±°ªÆ¨ß ºø³ø¹ª˛ ±Æ ˛°ªÆ±²ø¥ ø²º øº™ªÆ¨··²¹
·²¶´Æß˛ øÆ··²¹ ±´¨ ±º ¨¸ª Æª²ºªÆ·²¹ ±º ±Æ ¨¸ª ºø·¥´Æª
¨± Æª²ºªÆ ø²ß °Æ±ºª·±²ø¥ ªÆ™·½ªÙ ·²½¥´º·²¹Ê
ÔÚ Ã¸ª °Æª°øÆ·²¹Ù ø°°Æ±™·²¹Ù ±Æ ºø·¥·²¹ ¨± °Æª°øÆª
±Æ ø°°Æ±™ªÙ ³ø°Ù ºÆø©·²¹Ù ±°·²·±²Ù Æª°±Æ¨Ù
´Æ™ªßÙ ½¸ø²¹ª ±ÆºªÆÙ ºª·¹² ±Æ
°ª½·º·½ø¨·±²Â ±Æ
ÓÚ Õ´°ªÆ™·±ÆßÙ ·²°ª½¨·±² ±Æ ª²¹·²ªªÆ·²¹
ªÆ™·½ªÚ
Ã¸· ª®½¥´·±² ø°°¥·ª ª™ª² ·º ¨¸ª ½¥ø·³ ø¹ø·²¨
ø²ß ·²´Æªº ø¥¥ª¹ª ²ª¹¥·¹ª²½ª ±Æ ±¨¸ªÆ ©Æ±²¹º±·²¹
·² ¨¸ª ´°ªÆ™··±²Ù ¸·Æ·²¹Ù ª³°¥±ß³ª²¨Ù ¨Æø·²·²¹ ±Æ
³±²·¨±Æ·²¹ ±º ±¨¸ªÆ æß ¨¸ø¨ ·²´ÆªºÙ ·º ¨¸ª
˛±½½´ÆÆª²½ª˛ ©¸·½¸ ½ø´ªº ¨¸ª ˛æ±º·¥ß ·²¶´Æß˛ ±Æ
˛°Æ±°ªÆ¨ß ºø³ø¹ª˛Ù ±Æ ¨¸ª ±ººª²ª ©¸·½¸ ½ø´ªº
¨¸ª ˛°ªÆ±²ø¥ ø²º øº™ªÆ¨··²¹ ·²¶´Æß˛Ù ·²™±¥™ªº ¨¸ª
Æª²ºªÆ·²¹ ±º ±Æ ¨¸ª ºø·¥´Æª ¨± Æª²ºªÆ ø²ß
°Æ±ºª·±²ø¥ ªÆ™·½ªÚ
›Ú …·¨¸ Æª°ª½¨ ¨± ¨¸ª ·²´Æø²½ª øºº±Æºªº ¨± ¨¸ªª
øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´ÆªºÙ ¨¸ª º±¥¥±©·²¹ · øººªº ¨±
Í»½¬·±² ××× Ô·³·¬ Ñº ×²«®¿²½»æ
Ã¸ª ³±¨ ©ª ©·¥¥ °øß ±² æª¸ø¥º ±º ¨¸ª øºº·¨·±²ø¥
·²´Æªº · ¨¸ª ø³±´²¨ ±º ·²´Æø²½ªÊ
ÔÚ ŒªØ´·Æªº æß ¨¸ª ½±²¨Æø½¨ ±Æ ø¹Æªª³ª²¨Â ±Æ
ÓÚ fl™ø·¥øæ¥ª ´²ºªÆ ¨¸ª ø°°¥·½øæ¥ª ¥·³·¨ ±º
·²´Æø²½ªÂ
©¸·½¸ª™ªÆ · ¥ªÚ
Ã¸· ª²º±Æª³ª²¨ ¸ø¥¥ ²±¨ ·²½Æªøª ¨¸ª
ø°°¥·½øæ¥ª ¥·³·¨ ±º ·²´Æø²½ªÚ
POLICY NUMBER: 325698
–—‘×›« “À”fi¤ŒÊ ÌÓÎÍÁË ›—””¤Œ›×fl‘ Ÿ¤“¤Œfl‘ ‘×flfi×‘×Ã« ›Ÿ Óð ÌÈ ÔÓ ÔÁ
Ãÿ×Õ ¤“‹—ŒÕ¤”¤“Ã ›ÿfl“Ÿ¤Õ Ãÿ¤ –—‘×›«Ú –‘¤flÕ¤ Œ¤fl‹ ×Ã ›flŒ¤⁄À‘‘«Ú ›Ÿ Óð ÌÈ ÔÓ ÔÁ w ×²´Æø²½ª ÕªÆ™·½ª —ºº·½ªÙ ×²½ÚÙ ÓðÔË –ø¹ª Ô ±º Ô ßÜÜ×Ì×ÑÒßÔ ×ÒÍËÎÛÜ ÑÉÒÛÎÍô ÔÛÍÍÛÛÍ ÑÎ
ÝÑÒÌÎßÝÌÑÎÍ ÝÑÓÐÔÛÌÛÜ ÑÐÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÍ
Ã¸· ª²º±Æª³ª²¨ ³±º·º·ª ·²´Æø²½ª °Æ±™·ºªº ´²ºªÆ ¨¸ª º±¥¥±©·²¹Ê ›—””¤Œ›×fl‘ Ÿ¤“¤Œfl‘ ‘×flfi×‘×Ã« ›— ¤ŒflŸ¤ –flŒÃ
–Œ—‹À›ÃÕÒ›—”–‘¤Ã¤‹ —–¤ŒflÃ×—“Õ ‘×flfi×‘×Ã« ›— ¤ŒflŸ¤ –flŒÃ Õ›ÿ¤‹À‘¤
“ø³ª —º flºº·¨·±²ø¥ ×²´Æªº –ªÆ±²¯˜
—Æ —Æ¹ø²·¶ø¨·±²¯˜ ‘±½ø¨·±² fl²º ‹ª½Æ·°¨·±² —º ›±³°¥ª¨ªº —°ªÆø¨·±² fi¥ø²µª¨ ø ŒªØ´·Æªº æß …Æ·¨¨ª² ›±²¨Æø½¨ fi¥ø²µª¨ ø ŒªØ´·Æªº æß …Æ·¨¨ª² ›±²¨Æø½¨ ×²º±Æ³ø¨·±² ÆªØ´·Æªº ¨± ½±³°¥ª¨ª ¨¸· Õ½¸ªº´¥ªÙ ·º ²±¨ ¸±©² øæ±™ªÙ ©·¥¥ æª ¸±©² ·² ¨¸ª ‹ª½¥øÆø¨·±²Ú ßò Í»½¬·±² ×× É¸± × ß² ×²«®»¼ · ø³ª²ºªº ¨±
·²½¥´ºª ø ø² øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº ¨¸ª °ªÆ±²¯˜ ±Æ
±Æ¹ø²·¶ø¨·±²¯˜ ¸±©² ·² ¨¸ª Õ½¸ªº´¥ªÙ æ´¨ ±²¥ß
©·¨¸ Æª°ª½¨ ¨± ¥·øæ·¥·¨ß º±Æ ˛æ±º·¥ß ·²¶´Æß˛ ±Æ
˛°Æ±°ªÆ¨ß ºø³ø¹ª˛ ½ø´ªºÙ ·² ©¸±¥ª ±Æ ·² °øÆ¨Ù æß
˛ß±´Æ ©±Æµ˛ ø¨ ¨¸ª ¥±½ø¨·±² ºª·¹²ø¨ªº ø²º
ºª½Æ·æªº ·² ¨¸ª Õ½¸ªº´¥ª ±º ¨¸· ª²º±Æª³ª²¨
°ªÆº±Æ³ªº º±Æ ¨¸ø¨ øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº ø²º ·²½¥´ºªº
·² ¨¸ª ˛°Æ±º´½¨Û½±³°¥ª¨ªº ±°ªÆø¨·±² ¸ø¶øÆº˛Ú
ÿ±©ª™ªÆÊ
ÔÚ Ã¸ª ·²´Æø²½ª øºº±Æºªº ¨± ´½¸ øºº·¨·±²ø¥
·²´Æªº ±²¥ß ø°°¥·ª ¨± ¨¸ª ª®¨ª²¨ °ªÆ³·¨¨ªº æß
¥ø©Â ø²º
ÓÚ ×º ½±™ªÆø¹ª °Æ±™·ºªº ¨± ¨¸ª øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº ·
ÆªØ´·Æªº æß ø ½±²¨Æø½¨ ±Æ ø¹Æªª³ª²¨Ù ¨¸ª
·²´Æø²½ª øºº±Æºªº ¨± ´½¸ øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº
©·¥¥ ²±¨ æª æÆ±øºªÆ ¨¸ø² ¨¸ø¨ ©¸·½¸ ß±´ øÆª
ÆªØ´·Æªº æß ¨¸ª ½±²¨Æø½¨ ±Æ ø¹Æªª³ª²¨ ¨±
°Æ±™·ºª º±Æ ´½¸ øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´ÆªºÚ
fiÚ …·¨¸ Æª°ª½¨ ¨± ¨¸ª ·²´Æø²½ª øºº±Æºªº ¨± ¨¸ªª
øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´ÆªºÙ ¨¸ª º±¥¥±©·²¹ · øººªº ¨±
Í»½¬·±² ××× Ô·³·¬ Ñº ×²«®¿²½»æ
×º ½±™ªÆø¹ª °Æ±™·ºªº ¨± ¨¸ª øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº ·
ÆªØ´·Æªº æß ø ½±²¨Æø½¨ ±Æ ø¹Æªª³ª²¨Ù ¨¸ª ³±¨ ©ª
©·¥¥ °øß ±² æª¸ø¥º ±º ¨¸ª øºº·¨·±²ø¥ ·²´Æªº · ¨¸ª
ø³±´²¨ ±º ·²´Æø²½ªÊ
ÔÚ ŒªØ´·Æªº æß ¨¸ª ½±²¨Æø½¨ ±Æ ø¹Æªª³ª²¨Â ±Æ
ÓÚ fl™ø·¥øæ¥ª ´²ºªÆ ¨¸ª ø°°¥·½øæ¥ª ¥·³·¨ ±º
·²´Æø²½ªÂ
©¸·½¸ª™ªÆ · ¥ªÚ
Ã¸· ª²º±Æª³ª²¨ ¸ø¥¥ ²±¨ ·²½Æªøª ¨¸ª
ø°°¥·½øæ¥ª ¥·³·¨ ±º ·²´Æø²½ªÚ
POLICY NUMBER: 325698

325698

!"#"!"!$%$"#&'%

()*+,-)./0/,12./*332./4).546789 $:;<=>
?@&"&&!"&@ "!"'"A?@&"'B CD2*/)EF,*/G/)HGFE232/*2)*+,-)./I,F12E/E+)E/,HD/3FJJFK2)L

MM
CO

MN
M
C

C
PMCMM
CO

MN
M
C Q
M
CO

MN
M
C CM
CO

MN
M
CP
0NMC
P0C
0 CM
C C
PO

MN
M
CP
0NMC
P0C
0
PC0R
C
P

MC0M
CO

MN
M
C
M
MP
C
CO
M
CO

MN
M
C P

N
P0C
MN
CMSP
0NMC
PCMS0
"!#'
:T<>$<UV=WAVBUU;:WXY:ZX=WAVB[ \:W]<Z:VU<^_XU<`abcUXZZ<Wd=WZU:dZ% )3F,G-H2F),/e+2,/EHF.FGIJ/H/HD2*0.D/E+J/423)FH*DFK)-fF1/4K2JJf/*DFK)2)HD/P/.J-,-H2F)*5
CD/3FJJFK2)L2*-EE/EHF-,-L,-IDg%U:WV><U> X;hZV><d=i<Ub;:XWVZZh<UV='VF3 "<dZX=W@j=W`XZX=WV[ k/K-21/-)l,2LDHF3,/.F1/,l-L-2)*HHD/I/,*F)m*n F,F,L-)2o-H2F)m*n*DFK)2)HD/0.D/E+J/-fF1/ f/.-+*/F3I-lG/)H*K/G-p/+)E/,HD2*F1/,-L/ -,H50+.DK-21/,fl+*-IIJ2/*F)JlHFHD//qH/)HHD-H HD/2)*+,/ED-*K-21/E2H*,2LDHF3,/.F1/,l-L-2)*H *+.DI/,*F)m*nF,F,L-)2o-H2F)m*nI,2F,HFJF**5CD2* /)EF,*/G/)H-IIJ2/*F)JlHFHD/I/,*F)m*nF, F,L-)2o-H2F)m*n*DFK)2)HD/0.D/E+J/-fF1/5 rstuvw

COMMERCIAL AUTO ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL AUTO POLICY
CAL 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 1 of 12 ends

This endorsement changes the Policy. Please read it carefully. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the Business Auto Coverage Form. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

The Business Auto Coverage Form is amended to include the following additions and extensions of coverage:

A. Temporary Substitute Auto Physical Damage
B. Designated (Additional) Insured Coverage
C. Newly Acquired Organization
D. Employees As Insureds
E. Employee Hired Autos
F. Supplementary Payments – Higher Limits
G. Expected Or Intended Injury
H. Fellow Employee Coverage
I. Towing And Labor
J. Expense To Recover A Stolen Auto
K. Transportation Expenses Increased
L. Rental Reimbursement
M. “Personal Effects”
N. Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage
O. Airbag Coverage
P. Audio, Visual And Data Electronic Equipment Coverage Q. Original Equipment Manufacturer Parts Replacement
R. Loan/Lease Gap Coverage
S. Waiver Of Depreciation – Private Passenger Vehicle
T. Glass Repair – Waiver Of Deductible
U. Common Deductible
V. Duties In The Event Of Accident, Claim, Suit Or Loss - Amended W. Waiver Of Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us (Waiver Of Subrogation) X. Unintentional Failure To Disclose Hazards
Y. Cancellation – 60 Days Notice
Z. “Mental Anguish” Resulting From “Bodily Injury”

SECTION I - COVERED AUTOS
A. Temporary Substitute Auto Physical Damage
SECTION I – COVERED AUTOS, C. Certain Trailers, Mobile Equipment And Temporary Substitute Autos is amended to add the following:

If Physical Damage coverage is provided under the Business Auto Coverage Form for an “auto” you own with symbol 2, 3, 4 or 7, the Physical Damage coverages provided for that owned “auto” are extended to any “auto” you do not own while used with the express or implied permission of its owner. Such “auto” must be used as a temporary substitute for the covered “auto” you own that is out of service because of its breakdown, repair, service, “loss” or destruction.

Policy Number: 325699

COMMERCIAL AUTO ENHANCEMENT ENDORSEMENT

COMMERCIAL AUTO POLICY
CAL 01 01 06 19 CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Page 2 of 12 ends

City Council - Successor Agency - Housing AuthorityOctober 20, 2026

City Council - Successor Agency - Housing Authority
October 20, 2026