102026 PW On-Call Professional Airport Consultant Services Mead and Hunt, Inc PSA — City Council - Successor Agency

CITY OF FULLERTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH
MEAD & HUNT, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this __ day of October 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF FULLERTON, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and Mead & Hunt, Inc., a Wisconson State Corporation (“Consultant”).

W I T N E S S E T H :

A. City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant as an independent contractor to provide certain Professional Architectural, Engineering, Planning, and/or Environmental services, on an as-needed basis, as more fully described herein.

B. Consultant represents that it has that degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Code section 37103, and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perform the services herein contemplated.

C. City and Consultant desire to contract for the specific services described herein, and desire to set forth their rights, duties and liabilities in connection with the services to be performed.

D. No official or employee of City has a financial interest, within the provisions of Sections 1090-1092 of the California Government Code, in the subject matter of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.0. SERVICES PROVIDED BY CONSULTANT

1.1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall provide the professional services described in the City’s Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”), attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and Consultant’s Response to City’s RFP (“Consultant’s Proposal”), attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, both incorporated herein by this reference.

1.2. Professional Practices. All professional services to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided by personnel experienced in their respective fields and in a manner consistent with the standards of care, diligence and skill ordinarily exercised by professional consultants in similar fields and circumstances in accordance with sound professional practices. Consultant also warrants that it is familiar with all laws and regulations that may affect its performance of this Agreement and shall advise City of any changes in any laws that may affect Consultant’s performance of this Agreement.

1.3. Performance to Satisfaction of City. Consultant agrees to perform all the work to the reasonable satisfaction of the City, in accordance with the applicable professional standard of care and City specifications and within the hereinafter specified. Evaluations of the work will be done by the City Manager or his designee. If the quality of work is not satisfactory, City in its discretion has the right to:
(a) Meet with Consultant to review the quality of the work and resolve the matters of concern;
MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 2 ends

(b) Require Consultant to repeat the work at no additional fee until it is satisfactory; and/or
(c) Terminate the Agreement as hereinafter set forth.

1.4. Warranty. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this Agreement in compliance with all applicable and non conflicting Federal and California employment laws, including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers’ compensation insurance and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description including attorneys’ fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which may be incurred by reason of Consultant’s performance under this Agreement.

1.5. Non-discrimination. In performing this Agreement, Consultant shall not engage in, nor permit its agents to engage in, discrimination in employment of persons because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sexual gender or sexual orientation, except as permitted pursuant to Section 12940 of the Government Code.

1.6. Non-Exclusive Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that City may enter into agreements with other consultants for services similar to the services that are subject to this Agreement or may have its own employees perform services similar to those services contemplated by this Agreement.

1.7. Delegation and Assignment. This is a personal service contract, and the duties set forth herein shall not be delegated or assigned to any person or entity without the prior written consent of City. Consultant may engage a subcontractor(s) as permitted by law and may employ other personnel to perform services contemplated by this Agreement at Consultant’s sole cost and expense.

1.8. Confidentiality. Employees of Consultant in the course of their duties may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of private individuals and employees of City. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if disclosure is required by law. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

2.0. COMPENSATION AND BILLING

2.1. Compensation. Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B. Consultant’s total compensation shall be based on each proposal the Consultant submits and the City accepts for the services requested on a particular project.

2.2. Additional Services. Consultant shall not receive compensation for any services provided outside the scope of services specified in Exhibit A unless the City or the Project MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 3 ends

Manager for this Project, prior to Consultant performing the additional services, approves such additional services in writing. It is specifically understood that oral requests and/or approvals of such additional services or additional compensation shall be barred and are unenforceable.

2.3. Method of Billing. Consultant may submit invoices to the City for approval on a progress basis, but no more often than two times a month. Said invoice shall be based on the total of all Consultant’s services which have been completed to City’s sole satisfaction. City shall pay Consultant’s invoice within fourty-five (45) days from the date City receives said invoice. Each invoice shall describe in detail, the services performed, the date of performance, and the associated time for completion. Any additional services approved and performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be designated as “Additional Services” and shall identify the number of the authorized change order, where applicable, on all invoices.

2.4. Records and Audits. Records of Consultant’s services relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally recognized accounting principles and shall be made available to City or its Project Manager for inspection and/or audit at mutually convenient times from the Effective Date of this Agreement until three (3) years after the termination date.

2.5. W-9. Consultant must provide City with a current W-9 form prior to the commencement of work under this Agreement. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to provide to the City any revised or updated W-9 form during the term of this Agreement.

3.0. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1. Commencement and Completion of Work. The professional services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall commence within five (5) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. Failure to commence work in a timely manner and/or diligently pursue work to completion may be grounds for termination of this Agreement.

3.2. Excusable Delays. Neither party shall be responsible for delays or lack of performance resulting from acts beyond the reasonable control of the party or parties. Such acts shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God, fire, strikes, material shortages, compliance with laws or regulations, riots, acts of war, or any other conditions beyond the reasonable control of a party.

4.0. TERM AND TERMINATION

4.1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue througha period of five (5) years, unless terminated as provided herein.

4.2. Notice of Termination. The City reserves and has the right and privilege of canceling, suspending or abandoning the execution of all or any part of the work contemplated by this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time, by providing written notice to Consultant.

The termination of this Agreement shall be deemed effective upon receipt of the notice of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant shall immediately stop rendering services under this Agreement unless directed otherwise by the City.

4.3. Compensation. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant for reasonable costs incurred and professional services satisfactorily performed up to and including the date of City’s written notice of termination. Compensation for work in progress shall be prorated based on the percentage of work completed as of the effective date of termination in MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 4 ends

accordance with the fees set forth herein. In ascertaining the professional services actually rendered hereunder up to the effective date of termination of this Agreement, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents pertaining to the services contemplated herein whether delivered to the City or in the possession of the Consultant.

4.4. Documents. In the event of termination of this Agreement, all documents prepared by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, finished or unfinished design, development and construction documents, data studies, drawings, maps and reports, shall be delivered to the City within ten (10) days of delivery of termination notice to Consultant, at no cost to City. Any use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization from Consultant shall be at City's sole risk and without liability or legal expense to Consultant.

5.0. INSURANCE

5.1. Insurance Required. Consultant shall procure and maintain throughout the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall provide current evidence of the required insurance in a form acceptable to City and shall provide replacement evidence for any required insurance which expires prior to the completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement.

Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting in any way, the Indemnification and Hold Harmless clause contained herein in Section 6.8 or the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property.

5.2. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance.

A. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form #CG 00 01, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to the Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

B. Business Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain business automobile liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form # CA 00 01, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non-owned automobiles.

C. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California and employers’ liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident.

D. Professional Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with a limit of not less than $2,000,000.

Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retro date of the policy shall be prior to the start of the contract work.

MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 5 ends

E. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond. Consultant shall maintain a fidelity bond with a minimum limit of $1,000,000, providing coverage for the acts of all employees, officers and directors of Consultant.

F. Cyber Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain cyber liability insurance coverage with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Consultant in this Agreement and shall include but not be limited to claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security.

The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines, penalties and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.

5.3. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by City.

5.4. Other Insurance Provisions. The required insurance policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

A. Commercial General Liability. City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. Such coverage as an additional insured shall not be limited to the period of time during which Consultant is conducting ongoing operations for City but rather, shall continue after the completion of such operations. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection afforded to City, its officers, employees and volunteers.

B. Commercial General Liability. This insurance shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, employees and volunteers and shall apply separately to each insured against whom a suit is brought or a claim is made. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, employees and volunteers shall be excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

C. Professional Liability. If the Professional Liability policy is written on a “claims made” form, the Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or beginning of contract work. The insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least (5) years after completion of the contract work. If the coverage is canceled or non-renewed and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting coverage” for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

D. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance. Insurer shall waive their right of subrogation against City, its officers, employees and volunteers for work done on behalf of City.

E. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond, City shall be named as third party beneficiary for losses arising from work done on behalf of City.

F. All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 6 ends

endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

If Consultant maintains higher limits or has broader coverage than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to all coverage, and to the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

G. Subcontractors. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subconsultants.

H. Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage or other special circumstances.

5.5 Acceptability of Insurers. All required insurance shall be placed with insurers acceptable to City with current BEST’S ratings of no less than A, Class VII. Workers’ compensation insurance may be placed with the California State Compensation Insurance Fund.

All insurers shall be licensed by or hold admitted status in the State of California. At the sole discretion of City, insurance provided by non-admitted or surplus carriers with a minimum BEST’S rating of no less than A- Class X may be accepted if Consultant evidences the requisite need to the sole satisfaction of City.

5.6 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance which bear original signatures of authorized agents and which reflect insurers names and addresses, policy numbers, coverage, limits, deductibles and self-insured retentions.

Additionally, Consultant shall furnish copies of all policy endorsements required herein. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by City before work commences.

City reserves the right to require at any time complete, certified copies of any or all required insurance policies and endorsements.

6.0. GENERAL PROVISIONS

6.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to any matter referenced herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. This Agreement may be modified only in writing, and signed by the parties in interest at the time of such modification. The terms of this Agreement shall prevail over any inconsistent provision in any other contract document appurtenant hereto, including exhibits to this Agreement.

6.2. Representatives. The City Manager or his designee shall be the representative of City for purposes of this Agreement and may issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of the City, called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.

Consultant shall designate a representative for purposes of this Agreement who shall be authorized to issue all consents, approvals, directives and agreements on behalf of Consultant called for by this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.

MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 7 ends

6.3. Project Managers. City shall designate a Project Manager to work directly with Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall designate a Project Manager who shall represent it and be its agent in all consultations with City during the term of this Agreement. Consultant or its Project Manager shall attend and assist in all coordination meetings called by City.

6.4. Notices. Any notices, documents, correspondence or other communications concerning this Agreement or the work hereunder may be provided by personal delivery, facsimile or mail and shall be addressed as set forth below. Such communication shall be deemed served or delivered: a) at the time of delivery if such communication is sent by personal delivery; b) at the time of transmission if such communication is sent by facsimile; and c) 48 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail as reflected by the official U.S. postmark if such communication is sent through regular United States mail.

IF TO CONSULTANT: IF TO CITY:

Mead & Hunt, Inc.
3110 E Guasti Road, Suite 330
Ontario, CA 91761
Attn: Jeff Leonard
Principal-in-Charge
City of Fullerton
303 W. Commonwealth Ave.

Fullerton, CA 92832
Attn: Stephen Bise
Director of Public Works

6.5. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof.

6.6. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California.

6.7. Assignment. Consultant shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign, transfer, sublet or encumber all or any part of Consultant's interest in this Agreement without City's prior written consent. Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and cause for termination of this Agreement.

Regardless of City's consent, no subletting or assignment shall release Consultant of Consultant's obligation to perform all other obligations to be performed by Consultant hereunder for the term of this Agreement.

6.8. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent of the law, Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees, at Consultant’s sole expense, from and against claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees arising out of the performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the professional services undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 8 ends

any claim, action, complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees based upon the work performed by Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints, or suits arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained either in the City’s specifications or Consultant’s Proposal, which shall be of no force and effect.

6.9. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall be acting at all times as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act on behalf of City as an agent.

Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its or employees are in any manner agents or employees of City. Consultant shall secure, at its sole expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of Income Tax, Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and other payroll deductions for Consultant and its officers, agents, and employees, and all business licenses, if any are required, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with the applicable worker’s compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this paragraph.

6.10. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

6.11. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation which City might require.

MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 9 ends

6.12. Ownership of Documents. All findings, reports, CAD drawings, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes or discs, files and tapes furnished or prepared by Consultant or any of its subcontractors in the course of performance of this Agreement, shall be and remain the sole property of City. Consultant agrees that any such documents or information shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior consent of City. Any use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement, and any use of incomplete documents, shall be at the sole risk of City and without liability or legal exposure to Consultant. City shall indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from City’s use of such documents for other projects not contemplated by this Agreement or use of incomplete documents furnished by Consultant. Consultant shall deliver to City any findings, reports, documents, information, data, in any form, including but not limited to, computer tapes, discs, files, audio tapes or any other Project related items as requested by City or its authorized representative, at no additional cost to the City.

6.13. Public Records Act Disclosure. Consultant has been advised and is aware that this Agreement and all reports, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement and provided to City may be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Section 6250 et seq.).

Exceptions to public disclosure may be those documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the California Government Code Section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret. The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.

6.14. Conflict of Interest. Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants, if any, will comply with all conflict of interest statutes of the State of California applicable to Consultant's services under this agreement, including, but not limited to, the Political Reform Act (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.) and Government Code Section 1090.

During the term of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, associates and subconsultants shall not, without the prior written approval of the City Representative, perform work for another person or entity for whom Consultant is not currently performing work that would require Consultant or one of its officers, employees, associates or subconsultants to abstain from a decision under this Agreement pursuant to a conflict of interest statute.

6.15. Responsibility for Errors. Consultant shall be responsible for its work under this Agreement. Consultant, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City’s representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Consultant occurs, without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled to at law or equity, Consultant shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Consultant professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. In addition, Consultant shall reimburse City for any and all costs, expenses and/or damages, if any, that the City has incurred due to the aforementioned error or omission.

6.16. Prohibited Employment. Consultant will not employ any regular employee of City while this Agreement is in effect.

MEAD & HUNT, INC.

Page 10 ends

6.17. Order of Precedence. In the event of an inconsistency in this Agreement and any of the attached Exhibits, the terms set forth in this Agreement shall prevail. If, and to the extent this Agreement incorporates by reference any provision of any document, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Agreement. Nevertheless, if there is any conflict among the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those of any such provision or provisions so incorporated by reference, this Agreement shall govern over the document referenced.

6.18. Costs. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein.

6.19. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Consultant and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right in, under or to this Agreement.

6.20. Headings. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

6.21. Construction. The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

6.22. Amendments. Only a writing executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns may amend this Agreement.

6.23. Waiver. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any occurrence or event shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

6.24. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party, is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding, then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s) through good faith negotiations.

6.25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement.

EXHIBIT A

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CITY OF FULLERTON

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION

PROFESSIONAL

ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING/PLANNING/ENVIRONMEN

TAL SERVICES INVOLVING DESIGNATED CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS AT FULLERTON

MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
2526-RFQ-012
PROPOSAL DUE:

JUNE 26, 2026, 4:30 PM
For more information, please visit our online supplier portal, located at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton
Table Of Contents

1. SECTION I

1.1. NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

2. SECTION II

2.1. INTRODUCTION

2.2. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

2.3. SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

2.4. SCOPE OF WORK

3. SECTION III

3.1. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

3.2. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

4. SECTION IV

4.1. EVALUATION AND AWARD

4.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

5. SECTION V

5.1. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

5.2. ATTACHMENTS
Attachments:

A - PSA - Standard -Master-SAMPLE

1. SECTION I

1.1. NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

1.1.1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
The City of Fullerton is requesting Proposals from qualified airport planning, engineering, and environmental firms for the completion of plans and specifications necessary to complete various improvement projects involving designated capital improvement projects at the Fullerton Municipal Airport. These various projects are part of the five-year Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) submittal to FAA LAX-ADO.

Interested firms shall submit their proposal no later than 4:30 pm on Friday, June 26, 2026.

This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) provides information on the City of Fullerton, the required scope of services, the consultant/contractor selection process, and the minimum information that must be included in the RFQ Response. Selection of the approved consultant will be based upon overall staff qualifications, relevant design experience, and demonstrated familiarity with the FAA project development process. The final contract for professional services will be in conformance with the provisions of FAA AC 150/5100-14E, "Architectural, Engineering, and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects" and Title 49 CFR Part 26 ”Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Programs.”
Prior to the award of contract, the City reserves the right to cancel this request for proposals without notice. The scope of the various project improvements are covered under federal grant assurances and jurisdiction, requiring interaction and coordination with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Los Angeles Airports District Office (ADO).

Parties submitting proposals shall be prepared to perform all work in accordance with FAA, State, and local policies and guidelines. The final scope of work and schedule will be negotiated upon selection of the most qualified firm, and subject to the availability of federal and state grants. The final scope and fee for each project will be negotiated separately upon FAA approval to fund the projects, or by fiscal year.

Please note that the City is seeking a Statement of Qualifications proposal, in which a "Cost Proposal" or "Fee Schedule" is not being requested at this time. The City is seeking to award multiple on-call professional services agreements with the firms selected to perform the required scope of services based on a number of qualifying and determinable factors, as outlined in this RFP. Once the top ranked firm is selected, the City will seek a Cost Proposal for said Project. Proposals will be evaluated based on firm’s qualifications and experience, ability to perform scope of services and implementation plan, and any other criteria set out herein this RFQ. The City shall be the sole judge of the qualifications and services and reserves the right to select firm(s) on any basis or weighted criteria that is in the best interests of the City.

1.1.2. BACKGROUND
The City of Fullerton is located 22 miles southeast of metropolitan Los Angeles, in the center of North Orange County. Fullerton is a full-service, general law city that was incorporated in 1904. Fullerton is renowned for its unique mix of residential, commercial, industrial, educational, and cultural environments and is known for being “the Education Community”. Fullerton has 52 City parks, a museum, a cultural center, a public library, a golf course, and 29 miles of recreational trails. Fullerton provides an outstanding quality of life for both residents and businesses. At 22.4 square miles, Fullerton is also one of the largest cities in Orange County by area and is the sixth most populous.

1.1.3. SUBMITTAL DEADLINE
COMPLETE ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN Friday, June 26, 2026 at 4:30 pm PST via the City’s eProcurement portal, OpenGov at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton. Proposals submitted by email, mail, or fax, will not be accepted nor considered. Failure to upload due to electronic glitches is not a legitimate reason for proposals submitted after the deadline. The City may extend the deadline at its discretion. Please see instructions in Section 3 for details on how to submit a proposal to this RFQ.

It is not the responsibility of the City to notify potential bidders. Prospective bidders shall be notified via the City’s eProcurement portal, OpenGov at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton. Registration is free and prospective bidders and firms may select to be notified of all future bids posted by the City of Fullerton.

Proposed RFQ Schedule
** Proposed RFQ Schedule is “Tentative” and may be changed at the City’s discretion.

Interviews will be scheduled if required **
Release of RFQ: May 29, 2026
Question Submittal Deadline: June 12, 2026, 4:30pm
Response to Questions Posted: June 19, 2026, 4:30pm
RFQ Submittal Deadline: June 26, 2026, 4:30pm
Consultant Interviews: TBD
Agreement/Contract Finalized: August 2026
Agreement/Contract Award: August 2026

2. SECTION II

2.1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Fullerton is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced firms for

PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING/PLANNING/ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES INVOLVING DESIGNATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS AT FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT.

It is the intent of the City of Fullerton to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with a qualified aviation engineering consultant firm for a period of five (5) years. Services requested include general consulting, planning, environmental, engineering, surveying, geotechnical consulting and may include construction inspection/management services.

The scope of work may include, but not be limited to, the following projects as listed in Fullerton Municipal Airports five-year Airport Capital Improvement Plan:
• Update Airport Layout Plan
• South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and Markings Rehabilitation • Southeast Hangars Rehabilitation - Phase II
• AAM/UAM Planning and Feasibility Studies

2.2. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Only those consultants with qualified experience as it relates to the services requested in this solicitation will be considered during the evaluation process. Consultant staff assigned to execute the scope of services must have relevant experience in providing the necessary services as described under the scope of services. All personnel assigned to complete the scope of work shall possess appropriate certifications or registrations as required by state and local agencies.

2.3. SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
The following projects are part of the five year Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) submittal to FAA LAX-ADO.

2.3.1. SOUTH AIRCRAFT PARKING RAMP PAVEMENT AND MARKINGS REHABILTATION FY2028:

This project will include the in place pulverization of existing asphalt concrete parking ramp on the south side of the airport. Approximate project area is 150,000 square feet. New aircraft tie down anchors will be installed and striping will be replaced. Airport staff is also considering a revised layout for aircraft parking concurrent with this project.

2.3.2. SOUTHEAST HANGAR REHABILITATION FY2026/27 PHASES 1&2:

The southeast aircraft storage hangars are aging and are in need of upgrades such as new roofing, new rain gutters, electrical upgrades, paint, and new weather stripping. All work will need to be accomplished with hangar contents in place and well protected.

2.3.3. URBAN AIR MOBILITY/ADVANCED AIR MOBILITY:

Fullerton Airport has been identified as a key location for several different air taxi companies including JOBY Aviation, WISK Aero, and BETA Technologies. Feasibility and/or planning studies will need to be conducted to highlight electrical power for charging, aircraft parking, aircraft operations, and vehicle parking.

2.3.4. UPDATE AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN (ALP):

Update ALP and Exhibit A Property Map to reflect new and proposed construction and other airfield modifications.

2.4. SCOPE OF WORK
The City of Fullerton is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced firms for

PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING/PLANNING/ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES INVOLVING DESIGNATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS AT FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT.

It is the intent of the City of Fullerton to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with a qualified aviation engineering consultant firm for a period of five years. Services requested include general consulting, planning, environmental, engineering, surveying, geotechnical consulting and may include construction inspection/management services.

3. SECTION III

3.1. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

3.1.1. Examination of Proposal Documents
By submitting a proposal, firm(s) represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the work required under this RFQ and is capable of performing quality work to achieve the City’s objectives.

3.1.2. Addenda
Any changes to the requirements will be made by written addendum to this RFQ and will be posted on OpenGov and City of Fullerton Bid Webpage. Any written addenda issued pertaining to this RFQ shall be incorporated into the terms and conditions of any resulting Agreement. City will not be bound to any modifications to or deviations from the requirements set forth in this RFQ as the result of oral instructions. Firms shall acknowledge receipt of addenda in their proposals.

If a Proposer discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other error in the RFQ, the proposer should immediately provide the City written notice of the problem and request that the RFQ be clarified or modified. Without disclosing the source of the request, the City may modify the documents prior to the date fixed for submission of proposals by issuing an addendum.

If prior to the date fixed for submissions, a firm(s) knows of or should have known of an error in the RFQ but fails to notify the City of the error, the firm shall submit a proposal at their own risk, and if awarded a contract, shall not be entitled to additional compensation or time by reason of the error or its later correction.

3.1.3. Request for Information
Submitting Questions
All questions must be submitted and received by the City no later than 4:30 pm PST on Friday, June 12, 2026.

Request for clarifications, questions and comments must be submitted through the City’s eProcurement Portal at OpenGov (https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton).

Registration is free and interested proposers can select to receive automatic bid notifications from the City.

City Responses
Responses from the City will be posted as an Addendum to this RFQ on the City’s eProcurement Portal, OpenGov to be posted no later than Friday, June 19, 2026.

City’s eProcurement Portal – OpenGov:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/cityoffullerton
General Inquiries
General questions regarding this RFQ are to be directed to the City’s Purchasing Division as follows:

Vanessa Slouka, Buyer
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: (714) 738-6533
** Any contact outside of the City staff/representative shall be cause for disqualification **

3.1.4. California Public Records Act (CPRA)
All proposals submitted in response of this RFQ become the property of the City and under the Public Records Act (Government Code Section 7920.000 el. Seq.) are public record, and as such, may be subject to public review. However, the proposals shall not be disclosed until final negotiations are complete and/or recommendation for action is made to City Manager and/or the City Council.

If a proposer claims a privilege against public disclosure for trade secret or other proprietary information, such information must be clearly identified in the proposal. Note that under California Law, price proposal to a public agency is not a trade secret.

3.1.5. Acceptance of Proposals
A. City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any item or part thereof, or to waive any informalities or irregularities in proposals.

B. City reserves the right to withdraw or cancel this RFQ at any time without prior notice, and the City makes no representations that any contract will be awarded to any Proposer responding to this RFQ.

C. City reserves the right to postpone proposal openings for its own convenience.

D. Submitted proposals are not to be copyrighted.

E. City does not guarantee any work upon award of an agreement.

3.1.6. Pre-Contractual Expenses
City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by firm in the preparation of its proposal. Firm shall not include any such expenses as part of its proposal.

Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by firm(s) in:

A. Preparing its proposal in response to this RFQ;
B. Submitting that proposal to the City;
C. Negotiating with the City any matter related to this proposal; or any other expenses incurred by firm prior to date of award, if any, of the Agreement.

3.1.7. Joint Offers
Where two or more firms desire to submit a single proposal in response to this RFQ, they should do so on a prime-sub-consultant basis rather than as a joint venture. City intends to do business with a single firm per awarded agreement and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture.

3.1.8. Professional Services Agreement
The selected firm shall enter into an agreement with the City based upon the contents of the RFQ and the firm’s proposal. The City’s standard form of agreement is included as Attachment A. The firm shall carefully review the agreement, especially with regard to the indemnity and insurance provisions, and include with the proposal a description of any exceptions, technical or contractual, requested to the standard contract. It is highly unlikely the City will accept any changes, modifications, or waivers of any provision of this Agreement and the City has the right to reject any proposed changes.

If there are exceptions or are no exceptions, a statement to the effect shall be provided in Section 6.1 Vendor Questionnaire, Question 3.

3.1.9. City Business License
The successful consultant(s) and sub-consultants are required to obtain and maintain a City of Fullerton business license. The City business license shall be maintained for the duration of the Agreement. A current business license is not a prerequisite for submittal of the qualifications.

3.2. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.2.1. Commercial General Liability Insurance.

Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form #CG 00 01, with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence.

If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to the Agreement or shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

3.2.2. Business Automobile Liability Insurance.

Consultant shall maintain business automobile liability insurance coverage in a form at least as broad as ISO Form # CA 00 01, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non-owned automobiles.

3.2.3. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance.

Consultant shall maintain workers’ compensation insurance as required by the State of California and employers’ liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident.

3.2.4. Professional Liability Insurance
Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with a limit of not less than $2,000,000. Architects’ and engineers’ coverage shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. If policy is written as a “claims made” policy, the retro date of the policy shall be prior to the start of the contract work.

3.2.5. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond
Consultant shall maintain a fidelity bond with a minimum limit of $1,000,000, providing coverage for the acts of all employees, officers and directors of Consultant.

3.2.6. Cyber Liability Insurance
Consultant shall maintain cyber liability insurance coverage with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Consultant in this Agreement and shall include but not be limited to claims involving infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, alteration of electronic information, extortion and network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs as well as regulatory fines, penalties and credit monitoring expenses with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.

3.2.7. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by City.

3.2.8. Other Insurance Provisions
The required insurance policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

B. Commercial General Liability. This insurance shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, employees and volunteers and shall apply separately to each insured against whom a suit is brought or a claim is made. Any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by City, its officers, employees and volunteers shall be excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

D. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance. Insurer shall waive their right of subrogation against City, its officers, employees and volunteers for work done on behalf of City.

E. Employee/Officer Fidelity Bond, City shall be named as third party beneficiary for losses arising from work done on behalf of City.

F. All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

G. If Consultant maintains higher limits or has broader coverage than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to all coverage, and to the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

H. Subcontractors. Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subconsultants.

I. Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage or other special circumstances.

3.3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Proposal Format and Content
This section provides the requirements which the City will look for and expect to be included in the proposal.

Electronic proposals shall be submitted electronically in a format that will print on 8 ½” x 11" size paper. Charts and schedules must adhere to this requirement as well. Proposals should not include any unnecessary elaborate or promotional material. Lengthy narrative is discouraged, and presentations should be brief and concise. Links to sample work should be clearly labeled and identified in the proposal.

The Proposal should be presented in the order shown and include the following:

3.3.1. Letter of Transmittal
The Letter of Transmittal shall be high-level and concise (recommended no more than 1 page), addressed to the City of Fullerton, and at a minimum contain the following:

A. Express the firm’s intent and formal interest in applying for this RFQ and why their firm’s services are advantageous/beneficial to the City.

B. Identification of proposer that will have contractual responsibility with the City.

Identification shall include legal name of company, corporate address, and telephone number. Include name, title, address, email and telephone number of the contact person identified during period of proposal evaluation.

C. Identification of all proposed sub-consultants (if applicable) including legal name of company, contact person’s name and address, and phone number.

D. Acknowledgment of receipt of all RFQ addenda, if any.

E. A statement to the effect that the proposal shall remain valid for a period of no less than 120 days from the date of submittal.

F. Signature of a person authorized to bind proposer to the terms of the proposal.

G. Signed statement attesting that all information submitted with the proposal is true and correct.

3.3.2. Qualifications & Experience
This section of the proposal should establish the ability of the firm(s) to satisfactorily perform the required work by reasons of: experience in performing work of the same or similar nature; demonstrated experience working with other public agencies; strength and stability of the firm(s); staffing capability; work load; record of meeting schedules on similar contracts; and supportive client references. Most recent references are preferrable.

Proposer to provide:

A. An overview of the proposal (including the firm’s relevant experience), a summary of the firm’s understanding of the requested Scope of Work, and its approach to providing those services.

B. A brief description of your firm’s background, size, office locations in California, including a narrative addressing performance record, experience in similar advisory services, quality of work, and ability to commit necessary time and resources to perform the Scope of Services described herein.

C. Qualifications of individuals to be assigned to perform the functions described in the Scope of Services herein.

D. List any disciplinary or investigative action, including audits, in the past five (5) years conducted by any professional body or local, state, or federal branch of government of your Firm.

E. List any and all litigation, pending or final, to which you are a party that is related or similar to the services being solicited in the past five (5) years.

F. References – Please provide at least three (3) client references for whom your firm has performed similar work to that requested in this RFQ during the past five (5) years. For each client, please provide the name, title, street address, telephone number, and email address.

G. Other Services – Please provide list of other services that your firm provides which are not identified in the Scope of Work but could be beneficial to the City.

3.3.3. Proposed Staffing and Organization
This section of the proposal should establish the method that will be used by the firm to manage the contract as well as identify key personnel assigned. Proposed staffing and organization are to be presented by firm identified in the Scope of Work.

Proposer to:

A. Provide education, experience and applicable professional credentials of contract staff. Include applicable professional credentials of “key” contract staff.

B. Identify primary Project Manager, role they will have with the City and primary office contact information.

C. Furnish brief resumes (no more than one page each) for key personnel.

D. Identify key personnel proposed to perform the work in the specified tasks and include major areas of subcontract work. Include the person's name, current location, and proposed position for this project, current assignment, and level of commitment to that assignment, availability for this assignment and how long each person has been with the firm.

E. Include an organization chart that clearly delineates communication/reporting relationships among the staff, including sub-consultants.

3.3.4. Detailed Work Plan
Proposer shall provide a narrative that addresses the Scope of Work and shows proposer's understanding of City's needs and requirements.

The Proposer shall:

A. Describe the proposed approach and work plan for completing the services specified in the Scope of Work. The description of the approach shall discuss the services in sufficient detail to demonstrate the proposer’s ability to accomplish the City’s objectives.

B. Describe the timeline for the work plan for completing the services specified in Scope of Work.

C. Describe approach to managing resources, including a description of the role(s) of any sub-consultants, if applicable, their specific responsibilities, and how their work will be supervised. Identify methods that proposer will use to ensure quality, budget, and schedule control.

3.3.5. Appendices
Information considered by Proposer to be pertinent to this agreement and which has not been specifically solicited in any of the aforementioned sections may be placed in a separate appendix section. Please note that this does not constitute an invitation to submit large amounts of extraneous materials. Appendices should be relevant and brief.

3.3.6. Fee Schedule / Cost Proposal
Cost proposals are NOT requested at this time and should not be submitted with your Statement of Qualifications proposal. Upon City’s evaluation of proposals, the top-ranked firm will be asked to provide project Cost Proposal for consideration.

4. SECTION IV

4.1. EVALUATION AND AWARD

4.1.1. Evaluation Criteria
City will evaluate the proposals received based on the following criteria outlined below and may utilize various weighting factors for different criteria or sub-criteria. Respondents who are not actively engaged in providing services of the nature proposed in their response to this request and/or who cannot clearly demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City their ability to satisfactorily perform the work in accordance with the requirements set forth in this request will not be considered. The City shall be the sole judge of the qualifications and services and its decision shall be final. Discussions may be conducted with respondents who submit qualifications determined to be reasonably acceptable of being selected for award.

City will evaluate the proposals received based on the criteria listed in the Evaluation Criteria Section.

The City will select a firm based upon the completeness and adherence to RFQ instructions, responding firms’ qualifications and experience, project management approach and work plan or implementation plan, as well as responses to any requests for information as set forth herein to this RFQ. If any addenda are made to the RFQ, the information provided will be considered as well. It should be noted that none of these factors in and of themselves are determinative, and the City reserves the right to select a firm on any basis that is in the best interests of the City.

The City may contact firms in response to questions raised in their proposals and the City reserves the right to cancel this solicitation without selecting any firms.

4.1.2. Evaluation Procedure
An Evaluation Committee will be selected to review and evaluate all proposals. The Evaluation Committee will be comprised of City staff and may include outside consultants to review all proposals submitted. The City of Fullerton reserves the right to request clarification of additional information from any firm at any time. After the proposals are evaluated, the City may elect to interview all, some, or none of the firms to help clarify and better evaluate each proposal. Firms may be asked to submit additional documentation at or after the interview stage or prepare a presentation. Please note that Interviews are at the City’s sole discretion and are not a requirement to make any recommendation to award an agreement.

Based upon evaluation of the proposals and any interviews (if conducted), the Evaluation Committee will recommend the top-ranked firms to award an agreement to the City Manager and/or City Council (if necessary).

The City reserves the right to select a firm without conducting interviews or abandon this RFQ. Final selection of firm and authority awarding agreements to proceed with these services shall be at the sole discretion of the City and if required, City Council.

4.1.3. Award
After conclusion of the evaluation period, a “Notice of Intent to Award” will be sent to all proposers to this RFQ identifying the top firm selected. Award to any firm selected is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final agreement terms and the approval of City. The City reserves the right to negotiate final agreement terms with the selected firm prior to award, and expressly reserves the right to negotiate with several firms simultaneously. However, since the selection and award may be made without discussion with any firm, the Proposer’s proposal submitted should contain firm's most favorable terms and conditions.

Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Proposers until an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, the City may negotiate an agreement with the next best qualified Proposer or withdraw the RFQ. In the event the City does not approve the recommendation to award, the RFQ may be cancelled without any cost or obligation of City.

City Manager and/or City Council action will be requested by City staff to award agreements to the selected firm

4.1.4. Notification of Award
Firms who submit a proposal in response to this RFQ shall be notified regarding the firm(s) awarded an agreement. Such notification shall be made within seven (7) days of the date the agreement is awarded. Notice of Intent to Award will be sent to all firms who submitted a proposal via OpenGov, the City’s eProcurement platform, and will also be available on the City’s Bid Webpage www.cityoffullerton.com/business/bids-rfps.

4.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA
An evaluation team will be established to review and evaluate all proposals submitted. The proposals received will be scored based on the following criteria using a 100 point total.

The firm that receives the highest score shall be recommended for award of contract following approval of the City Council. The City of Fullerton reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. All questions and answers are public information.

The City of Fullerton will cooperate in any requests for permissions or approvals required, but all permissions and approvals are the responsibility of the proponent. All applicable local, state, and federal permits and/or approvals required shall be the responsibility of the project proponent.

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Recognition of overall project concepts,
objectives and potential problems.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

2. Responsiveness to requirements. 0-100 Points 10
(10% of Total)

3. Capability to perform all aspects of the
project.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

4. Recent experience with similar airports
or project of comparable size and nature
to the proposed projects.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

5. Current workload and capability to meet
schedule and/or deadlines.
0-100 Points 20
(20% of Total)

6. Qualifications of the designated senior
individual who will be responsible for
delivery of all services.
0-100 Points 10
(10% of Total)

5. SECTION V

5.1. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Confirmation*
The Firm confirms that all the information provided is true and accurate. ☐ Please confirm
*Response required

2. Status of Past and Present Contract Form*
Firm shall list the status of past and present contracts where either the firm has provided services as a prime contractor or a sub-consultant during the past five (5) years and the contract has ended or will end in termination, settlement or litigation.

A. Public Agency city/county/other:

B. Contact Name:

C. Phone:

D. Project Award Date:

E. Original Contract Value:

F. Term of Contract:

1. Status of Contract:

2. Identify claims/litigation or settlements associated with the contract:
*Response required

3. Exceptions*
If your company is taking exception to any of the specifications, terms or conditions (including insurance indemnification and/or proposed contract language) stated in this Request for Proposal, please indicate below and describe details:

A. No exceptions taken
B. Exception taken to the scope of work or specifications C. Exception taken to indemnification and insurance requirements D. Exception to proposed contract language
E. Other
Please explain in detail:
*Response required

4. Technical Proposal*
Please submit your COMPLETE proposal, NOT to include the Fee Proposal, according to the instructions in REQUIRED PROPOSAL CONTENT.
*Response required

EXHIBIT B
CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL AND FEE SCHEDULE
June 26, 2026
City of Fullerton
Fullerton Municipal Airport
Professional Architectural/
Engineering/Planning/
Environmental Services
1 Letter of Transmittal 2
2 Qualifications & Experience 3
3 Proposed Staffing & Organization 8
4 Detailed Work Plan 24
5 Appendices n/a
Contents

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 1 Experience Exceptional
Subject: Letter of Transmittal for Professional Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services at Fullerton Municipal Airport
Dear Ms. Slouka and Selection Committee Members,
Fullerton Municipal Airport (FUL) is a vital aviation gateway for the City of Fullerton (City). As the only general aviation (GA) airport in Orange County, FUL offers robust services to support businesses and recreational pilots. As a public use facility, FUL plays a critical role in regional mobility, economic vitality, and emergency access.

Mead & Hunt’s 86 years of aviation practice brings deep expertise in runway, taxiway and apron design, pavement rehabilitation, geometric layout, airfield electrical systems, hangar improvements, and construction administration. Our firm has extensive experience delivering Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Improvement Program (AIP)-funded engineering projects similar to those planned at FUL in the coming years. Our team is excited for the opportunity to support the growth and maintain infrastructure for FUL. Client-focused dedication is a defining strength of Mead & Hunt.

This on-call will be led by Project Manager, Eric Loera, PE. He will be supported by Jeff Leonard, PE, Principal-In-Charge, and a dynamic team of planning, environmental, engineering, architecture, Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)/Urban Air Mobility (UAM), and construction management specialists all focused on the aviation sector, with the majority of our staff based in Southern California. The team is further supported by trusted subconsultants with local presence, extensive experience, and specialized knowledge in geotechnical investigations, topographical surveys, and environmental analysis and documentation to support airport projects. Together, our team brings a deep understanding of project phasing, operational constraints, and budget considerations, positioning us to deliver results with confidence.

Mead & Hunt acknowledges that no addenda were issued. This proposal shall remain valid for a period of no less than 120 days from the submittal date. Jeff Leonard is authorized to negotiate on behalf of, and to bind Mead & Hunt into an agreement for the required services. All information submitted with this proposal is true and correct.

Sincerely,
Mead & Hunt, Inc.

Eric Loera, PE | Project Manager Jeff Leonard, PE | Principal-In-Charge [email protected] | 909-467-8563 [email protected] | 707-284-8676 Letter of
Transmittal 1
Legal Name of Company
Mead & Hunt, Inc.

Corporate Address
2440 Deming Way
Middleton, WI 53562
Phone
608-273-6380

SUBCONSULTANTS
Legal Name of Company Contact Name Address Phone
Applied Earthworks (AE) Joan George 3550 E Florida Avenue, Suite H Hemet, CA 92544 951-766-2000 x523
Caskey Biological
Consulting, LLC (Caskey) Jason Caskey 2604 B El Camino Real #341 Carlsbad, CA 92008 918-671-7681
CL Surveying and
Mapping, Inc. (CL Survey) Lam Le 400 E Rincon Street, Suite 202 Corona, CA 92879 909-484-4200
Joseph C. Truxaw and
Associates, Inc. (Truxaw) Craig Di Bias 1915 W Orangewood Avenue, Suite 101 Orange, CA 92868 714-935-0265
Twining, Inc. (Twining) Sammy Daghighi 4811 Airport Plaza Dr, Suite 220 Long Beach, CA 90815 909-915-2051

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 2 Qualifications
& Experience 2
Mead & Hunt is an employee‑owned aviation consulting firm with more than 1,400 engineers, planners, architects, scientists, and technical staff located nationwide. Since 1900, we have built a reputation for responsive service, clear communication, and high‑quality project delivery, consistently earning recognition as a Top 25 Airport Design Firm by Engineering NewsRecord and as a recipient of the American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) Corporate Cup of Excellence. We embrace new technology, and Mead & Hunt has been a leader in AAM/UAM Planning at the state and local level.

The proposed core project team, consisting of Eric Loera, Jeff Leonard, Cameron Morrow, Maranda Thompson, Lisa Harmon, Corbett Smith, and Joe Cruz, possess strong relationships, understanding of the importance of the details, apply planning and design standards while maintaining quality, and provide frequent communication through the entire approval, funding, and closeout of a project. From Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) programming and funding eligibility, to obtaining Modifications for Standards (MOS) for critical project enhancements, and working with the Air Traffic Office (ATO) on reimbursable agreements, if required, Mead & Hunt’s personnel will successfully coordinate your projects while maximizing cost-effective design and airfield construction.

The Mead & Hunt team has worked directly with the FAA on hundreds of projects for many years, covering all aspects of aviation related planning, environmental evaluation, engineering, and airport facilities. We understand the importance of providing planning, engineering, and architectural services that comply with appropriate FAA regulations, advisory circulars (ACs), and other guidance. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the FAA regulations and guidance, Lisa and Maranda have experience leading statewide AAM/UAM system studies for clients such as the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT).

Commitment
to FUL
With offices
located across
California in
Ontario, Windsor,
San Diego, and
Sacramento, our
experienced team
is able to commit
the necessary time
and resources
to effectively
support the City’s
improvement
projects involving
FUL’s Capital
Improvement
Program.

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA
Mead & Hunt (MH)
Applied Earthworks (AE)
Caskey Biological Consulting, LLC (CASKEY)
CL Surveying and Mapping, Inc. (CL SURVEY)
Joseph C. Truxaw and Associates, Inc. (TRUXAW)
Twining, Inc. (TWINING)
Mead & Hunt (WINDSOR)
Mead & Hunt (ONTARIO)
ullerton Municipal Airport (FUL)
Applied Earthworks (AE)
Caskey Biological Consulting, LLC (CASKEY)
CL Surveying and Mapping, Inc. (CL SURVEY)
Joseph C. Truxaw and Associates, Inc. (TRUXAM)
Twining, Inc. (TWINING)
Fullerton
Municipal
Airport (FUL)

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 3 2 QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 4 BUSINESS SERVICES
y Program & Project Management
y Passenger Facility Charge
y Application/Administration
y Cost-Benefit Studies
y Business/Strategic Plans

AIR SERVICE CONSULTING
y Air Service Strategic Plans
y Airline Service Proposals
y Catchment Studies (i.e.,
leakage analysis)
y Air Cargo Development
Strategy Studies
y Visitation/Destination Analyses
(GPS location-based data)
y Market Performance, Airfare &
Schedule Monitoring
y US DOT Small Community Air
Service Development Program
Grant Application

PLANNING
y Aviation System Plans
y Master Plans
y Airport Layout Plans
y Land-Use Planning & Zoning
y Site Selection Studies
y Feasibility Studies
y Cargo Planning
y Land Acquisitions
y Air Mobility
y Electrification & Microgrids
y Spaceports
y Community Outreach & Education
y Emerging Entrants ADIP
y Forecasting
y Terminal & Landside Planning
y Approach & Departure Analysis
y Air Traffic Control Tower Siting
Studies
y Advanced Air Mobility Planning
Studies

GEOSPATIAL
y Enterprise GIS
y Asset Management
y Digital Twins
y Reality Capture
y Mobile & Field Solutions
y Visualization & Storytelling
y Grant Research/Writing

ENVIRONMENTAL

PLANNING
y Categorical Exclusions
y CEQA Support/Documentation
y Environmental Assessments
y Environmental Impact Statements
y PFAS Investigation
y Wetland Mitigation
y Part 150 Noise Studies
y Stormwater & Water/Flood
Plain Studies
y Air Quality Studies
y Historic Resource Eligibility Studies
y Wildlife Hazard Management
Services

SUSTAINABILITY &

RESILIENCY PLANNING
y Master Plans
y LEED, ENVISION & WELL
y Energy Audits
y Commissioning
y Waste Management
y Carbon Neutral/
Removal Studies
y Greenhouse Gas
Inventories & Reduction
y Net Zero Plans
y Climate Action
y Sustainability Tracking

TECHNOLOGY
y Technology Infrastructure
y Technology Master Planning
y Airport Technology Systems
y Cybersecurity Strategy &
Compliance
y Security System Design
y Data Science and Analytics

SOCIAL &

ENVIRONMENTAL

STEWARDSHIP
y Diversity, Equity, Inclusion &
Belonging Studies
y Environmental & Social
Governance
y Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise/Airport Concession
Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise Plans
y Sunflower Program Development

ARCHITECTURE &

BUILDING ENGINEERING
y Terminals
y Cargo & Support Facilities
y Aircraft Hangars
y Universal Design
y Airport Traffic
y Air Traffic Control Towers
y Maintenance Buildings
y Aircraft Rescue &
Firefighting Facilities
y Fixed Base Operator Facilities
y Snow Removal Equipment

INTERIOR DESIGN
y Customer Experience Studies
y Wayfinding Consultation
y Lighting Design
y Procurement & Installation
y Furniture & Finish Selections
y Reflected Ceiling Plans

AIRFIELD &

LANDSIDE DESIGN
y Runways, Taxiways, & Aprons
y Roadway & Parking
y Drainage
y Site Development
y Traffic & Parking Analysis Demand
y Revenue Studies
y Intermodal & Multimodal needs
y Accessibility and Wayfinding
y Control and Signalling
y Pavement Design & Alternatives
Evaluation
y Pavement Maintenance
y Life Cycle Cost Analyses

ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
& NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
y Airfield Lighting & Signage
y Electrical Vaults
y Air Traffic Control Tower
Instrumentation & Control
y Solar Analysis
y Systems Analysis & Inventory
y Perimeter Security Systems

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
y Administration & Management
y Resident Project Representative
y Survey Control & Project Layout

ENGINEER, PROCURE,
& CONSTRUCT
y Waste to Energy
y Microgrids
y Renewable Natural Gas
y Hangars
y Water, Wastewater, &
Water Reuse
We understand each airport is unique. Your goals and
vision are front and center as we work with you to plan for your current and future infrastructure maintenance, construction, or expansion needs.

Mead & Hunt Aviation Services
2 QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE
Mead & Hunt Litigation/Claim History
L. Leaphart v. M&H et al., Lancaster County, SC Case No. 2023-CP-29-01276 Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County, South Carolina Mead and Hunt, Inc., is one of four named defendants in this personal injury case, which occurred on a two-lane road under construction in Lancaster County. Plaintiff is alleging that two driveway entrances were improperly surfaced, changing the grade/slope and resulting in incorrect flow and drainage of water. Mead and Hunt provided inspection services for this project. Mead and Hunt was served in March 2025.

Shaw et al v. Q & D Construction, LLC, County of Sonoma, CA et al, Case No. 24CV00050 Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sonoma
Mead and Hunt, Inc. is one of four named defendants in this personal injury case which happened at an airport while it was under construction. Plaintiffs are alleging that construction defects and professional negligence contributed to an airport visitor opening a door into a pedestrian area that resulted in injuries to the plaintiff. Mead and Hunt provided design services for this project and only recently was added as a third-party defendant to an Amended Complaint and served in November of 2024. The case settled in mediation in May 2026.

Sarah E. Clark v. Mead & Hunt, Inc. et al, Case No. 23-C-590 Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia
Mead and Hunt, Inc. is one of four named defendants in this personal injury case which was caused by a traffic accident which occurred in an area of roadway construction. Mead and Hunt, Inc. provided construction inspection services on a transportation project and did not design or construct the project. Through mediation, the matter settled, and lawsuit was dismissed October 2024.

Van Nest et al v. Boggs Contracting, Inc. et al, Case No. 2022-CP-22-00423 Court of Common Pleas, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Georgetown County, South Carolina Mead and Hunt, Inc. is one of six named defendants in this personal injury case which was caused by a traffic accident that occurred in an area of roadway construction. Mead and Hunt, Inc. provided construction inspection services on a transportation project and did not design or construct the project. The case settled in mediation in November 2024.

Hunsicker v. Boggs Contracting, Inc. et al, Case No. 2024-CP-22-00580 Court of Common Pleas, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Georgetown County, South Carolina Mead and Hunt, Inc. is one of four named defendants in this personal injury case which was caused by a traffic accident that occurred in an area of roadway construction. Mead and Hunt, Inc. provided construction inspection services on a transportation project and did not design or construct the project. This case is in the discovery phase.

Abdille et al v. Bizzack Construction, LLC et al, Case No. 22-C-789 Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia
Mead and Hunt, Inc. is one of five named defendants in this personal injury case which was caused by a traffic accident which occurred in an area of roadway construction. Mead and Hunt, Inc. provided construction inspection services on a transportation project and did not design or construct the project. The case settled in mediation in November 2024.

Dowell v. Putzmeister America, Inc., C/A No. 2020-CP-21-02831 Court of Common Pleas, Florence County, South Carolina
This case involved a wrongful death claim in which Mead & Hunt had an employee presence at the job site when the incident occurred. Mead & Hunt denied any responsibility for the incident. The matter settled in mediation and the settlement is confidential. The case was dismissed in October of 2022.

Thomas Poston v. Horry County, C/A No. 2020-CP-26-03479 Court of Common Pleas, Horry County, South Carolina
As the owner’s engineer, Mead & Hunt, Inc. designed improvements and provided services for the paving of dirt roads. A resident on a county road claims water damage to his property as a result of the work, though the facts of the case do not support this allegation. The case settled in November 2024.

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 5 2 QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE
Mead & Hunt acquired Sabra & Associates, Inc. in April of 2019, the below matters relate to the acquired entity.

Diane Emerson v. Sabra & Associates, Inc., et al., Case No. D-06-CV-21-007586 District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County
Claim received November 4, 2021. Sabra & Associates (Sabra) conducted a traffic survey on November 7, 2018, for Montgomery County, Maryland. Plaintiff alleged that Sabra’s negligence caused Plaintiff to trip and sustain injuries. Sabra denied these allegations. This case settled and was dismissed in April 2023.

Mead & Hunt acquired Symbiont in June of 2022, the below matters relate to the acquired entity.

Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund, et al. v. Symbiont Construction, Inc., Case No. 21-CV-1401 United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

This case involved the desire of the Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund to audit payroll during a timeframe in which Symbiont Construction, Inc. had no union employees. The case was voluntarily dismissed in January 2023.

Symbiont Science, Engineering and Construction, Inc., Zurich American Insurance Company, et al vs. Ground Improvement Services, Inc., GeoStructures, Inc. et al.

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Symbiont and its client settled the client’s claim of negligence and defective construction prior to Symbiont and its carrier’s initiation of this subrogation claim. This subrogation claim is against a subconsultant/subcontractor that designed and constructed a geopier foundation system for a biogas production facility. The case settled in December of 2024.

Symbiont Design-Build, LLC and Symbiont Science, Engineering and Construction, Inc. v. Glacier Construction Co., Inc., Case No. 1:21-cv-2252
United States District Court for the District of Colorado This case involves Symbiont’s complaint of defective construction on the part of a subcontractor and the subcontractor’s counterclaim of negligence. Symbiont and the subcontractor corrected the work for the client prior to any legal action.

Symbiont and its client settled the matter without litigation. Symbiont and its subcontractor settled their dispute and the claim was dismissed in December 2022. The settlements are confidential.

Augustana College v. City of Rock Island, IL, Case No. 2018 L 71 Rock Island County Circuit Court, Illinois
The City of Rock Island (City) filed a complaint against Symbiont to make it a third-party defendant in the above case. The City attempted to tie a Combined Sewer Overflow study done by Symbiont in 2003 to a June 2017 sewer collapse that resulted in flooding at Augustana College (College) with damage to several of its buildings. The City’s own expert placed no responsibility on Symbiont. The matter settled in September of 2022 and the settlement is confidential.

Roumann Consulting, Inc. and Ron Rousse v. T.V. John & Son, Inc. et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-01407-LA.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

T.V. John & Son is now known as Symbiont. The circumstances of this case involve a terminated written service agreement and a claim of contract breach as a result of that termination. Numerous attempts have been made to settle the matter. The case is nearing the trial stage and is not covered by insurance.

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 6 2 QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE
Contact: Sara Iza, AICP, Assistant Airport Director
Phone: 805-692-6030
Email: [email protected]
Address: 601 Firestone Road, Goleta, CA 93117
City of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara Municipal Airport
Contact: Courtney Johnson, CM, CAE, Director of Airports Phone: 805-781-5205
Email: [email protected]
Address: 975 Airport Drive, Suite 1, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 County of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County Airport Contact: Samuel Maghakian, PMP, CM, Facilities Project Manager Phone: 626-300-4615
Email: [email protected]
Address: 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91803
Los Angeles County Public Works, Department of Airports Contact: David Smith, PhD, Chief Executive Officer
Phone: 661-824-2433
Email: [email protected]
Address: 1434 Flightline, Building No. 58, Mojave, CA 93501 Mojave Air and Space Port
Contact: Nathan Loebs, PE, Senior Transportation Electrical Engineer, Transportation Safety & ITS Research Program Manager, Division of Research, Innovation, and System Information (DRISI) Phone: 916-387-5743
Email: [email protected]
Address: 1727 30th Street, MS 65, Sacramento, CA 95816
California Department of Transportation
Contact: Angela Jamison, Director of Airports
Phone: 951-529-8195
Email: [email protected]
Address: 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501
Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency – Aviation Division
References

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 7 Proposed Staffing
& Organization 3

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Jeff Leonard, PE

PROJECT MANAGER
Eric Loera, PE

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP

QUALITY ASSURANCE
Jake Roberts, PE, ENV SP

QUALITY CONTROL
Rafael Gonzalez, PE
AAM/UAM/Energy Planning
Maranda Thompson, ENV SP
Lisa Harmon
Chad Reese, LEED AP BD+C,
TRUE Advisor
Airfield Planning
Corbett Smith, CM
Landside Planning
Kevin Smith, AAE
Sustainability & Resiliency
Chad Reese, LEED AP BD+C,
TRUE Advisor
Jake Roberts, PE, ENV SP
Environmental Support
Joan George, RA (AE)
Jason Caskey (Caskey)
Land Use Compatibility
Maranda Thompson, ENV SP

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL
LEAD
Lisa Harmon
Architectural Services
Joe Cruz, NOMA, AIA, NCARB
Nathan Clifford, AIA, NCARB, WELL AP

ARCHITECTURE
LEAD
Joe Cruz, NOMA, AIA, NCARB

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 8 Organization Chart
Support
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP
Mike Leraas
Jake Roberts, PE, ENV SP

CONSTRUCTION

ADMINISTRATION
LEAD
Eric Loera, PE
Civil Design & Engineering
Edward Heitmann, PE
Eric Loera, PE
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP
Construction Safety &
Phasing Plan (CSPP)
Jeff Leonard, PE
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP
FAA Airports District Office
(ADO) Coordination
Chuck McCormick
Electrical
Bill Ropposch, PE
Ethan Vink, EIT
LEAD
Edward Heitmann, PE
Survey
Lam Le, PLS (CL Survey)
Dan Calvillo, PLS (CL Survey)
Pavement Analysis
Jeff Leonard, PE
Eric Loera, PE
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP
Geotechnical
Sammy Daghighi, PE (Twining)
Paul Soltis, PE, GE (Twining)
Hydrology & Stormwater
Quality
Bob Thayne, PE
Craig Di Bias, PE, QSD/P, LEED AP
(Truxaw)

ENGINEERING
Principal-In-Charge
Jeff Leonard oversees many of Mead
& Hunt’s most challenging projects,
especially when dealing with multiphased, multi-year timelines. His responsibilities include overseeing
the southwest aviation business unit
planning and engineering departments
and he serves on many projects as a hands-on principal-incharge. He provides close coordination with clients, the FAA, public utility agencies, contractors, and airport users.

Jeff applies his expertise to growing GA airports through large-hub airports, typically serving in the principal-incharge and senior project engineer roles. Jeff’s experience coordinating with airport sponsors and the FAA makes for a seamless program and grant management process, leading
to comprehensive and flexible capital plans.

Jeff has more than 26 years of experience with complex
aviation projects at military, air carrier, and GA airports, primarily in the Southwestern states. Jeff is proficient in the program management, planning, design, and construction
administration of both airside and landside improvements, including civil design components for terminal buildings; runway, taxiway, and access road construction and
rehabilitation; airfield electrical and navigational aid (NAVAID) improvements; and drainage improvements,
including MS4 compliance measures. His experience varies from small, fast-track projects to large scale programs with multi-year timelines involving multiple contracts
running concurrently to achieve project success while also strategically managing funding sources and opportunities.

Jeff also has experience with alternative delivery projects, including large programs completed using Construction
Manager at Risk (CMAR) procurement.

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil and Environmental Engineering with Construction Management Emphasis, University of Wisconsin – Madison

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA, AZ, HI, NV

CURRENT LOCATION
y Windsor, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 26
Jeff Leonard, PE
Project Manager
Eric Loera is a civil engineer with
extensive hands-on experience
in airfield pavement design,
rehabilitation, and reconstruction,
specializing in full-depth pavement
reconstruction, and mill-and-overlay
pavement rehabilitation airfield
programs. His background combines technical precision
with strong production capabilities, drawing on project management to support drainage design, grading,
pavement evaluations, and airfield improvement projects.

Eric’s project work spans commercial service and GA
airports, where he has contributed both as project
manager, lead design engineer, and as a key technical
resource for multi-disciplinary airfield improvement teams.

Eric has played major roles in high-visibility pavement and geometric projects at airports such as Mojave Air and Space Port (MHV), Ontario International Airport (ONT),
Brackett Field Airport (POC), Meadows Field Airport (BFL), Riverside Municipal Airport (RAL), and San Luis Obispo
County Airport (SBP). Eric’s ability to fluidly transition between project management, design leadership, and
construction-phase coordination makes him a highly
adaptable contributor to complex airfield improvement
programs. He has also led and managed airport pavement
management plan (APMP) evaluations, giving him a
strong foundation in pavement condition assessment
and selecting appropriate rehabilitation strategies for deteriorating airfield pavements.

During construction, Eric provides hands-on support
ranging from design clarifications to on-site observation and Resident Engineer services. His collaborative approach and practical understanding of constructability help deliver durable, compliant airfield infrastructure while maintaining airport operations.

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Ontario, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 8
Eric Loera, PE
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 9 Resumes
Planning & Environmental
Lead & AAM/UAM/
Energy Planning
Lisa Harmon is an aviation and
environmental planner with more
than 25 years of experience in
environmental resource management,
regulatory compliance, and documentation for aviation
projects in accordance with the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and other state and local regulatory
frameworks. She is skilled in developing and implementing communications for the public and conducting public
outreach activities for aviation projects. Lisa is a skilled researcher who has served as principal investigator, project manager, or contributed to several research projects
undertaken by the Airport Cooperative Research Program
(ACRP).

Lisa routinely manages large, interdisciplinary project teams to address complex airport challenges. She
works with federal, state, and local resource managers
to promote collaborative solutions that further client
goals. She has collaborated with clients and communities nationwide to facilitate a greater understanding of the special challenges associated with aviation and community planning. She has managed or contributed to multiple
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans (ALUCPs) and Master Plans, as well as integrated aviation-related considerations into city and county General/Comprehensive Plans and
regional transportation plans
Lisa embraces new technologies to support industry
growth, such as AAM and clean transportation pursuits.

She has spoken at industry conferences nationally and
internationally about AAM topics, including airport
infrastructure planning and wildlife hazard management.

She is part of AAAE’s Emerging Technologies Working
Group Leadership team and has been a contributor to
NASA/VFS Commercial Air Transport Working Group.

EDUCATION
y MS, Transportation Management, Mineta Transportation
Institute at San Jose State University
y BA, English Literature, Wells College

CURRENT LOCATION
y Sacramento, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 17
Lisa Harmon
Deputy Project Manager
Cameron Morrow is a well-rounded
engineer and deputy project manager
with over eight years of experience
supporting the planning, design, and
construction of complex aviation and
roadway infrastructure projects. His
background includes comprehensive
involvement across project lifecycles, from conceptual
design through construction administration, with a strong understanding of airport operations and constructability constraints.

Cameron has contributed to numerous airside and landside projects at GA, commercial, municipal, and military
facilities. His technical experience includes the design and construction of runways, taxiways, terminal aprons, and GA aprons, as well as terminal buildings, hangars, and
supporting infrastructure such as airfield lighting systems, electrical vaults, and NAVAIDs. He has supported projects at major, regional, and local airports including SBP and ONT, among others.

His responsibilities have included coordinating
multidisciplinary teams, leading the preparation of plans and specifications, developing engineering design reports and calculations, preparing cost estimates, and supporting construction administration. He is experienced in ensuring project compliance with applicable standards, maintaining quality control (QC), and supporting stakeholder
coordination throughout project delivery.

Additionally, Cameron has experience supporting and
leading airport pavement management programs,
including pavement evaluation and condition assessments.

His work reflects a strong understanding of asset
management principles and long-term infrastructure
planning.

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo

CREDENTIALS
y Engineer-in-Training (EIT) – CA
y Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP)

CURRENT LOCATION
y San Clemente, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 8
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 10 AAM/UAM/Energy
Planning & Land Use
Compatibility
Maranda Thompson is an
accomplished project manager and
is well regarded by her clients, peers,
and project team members for her
superior communication and organizational skills. Maranda excels in managing projects with aggressive and firm
timeframes. These managerial qualities enable Maranda to effectively lead her projects to successful completion and adoption.

Maranda has over 23 years of experience in the practice of aviation planning. She possesses considerable experience in airport land use compatibility planning in the state of California. Maranda has spoken on the topic at several
regional conferences and numerous public meetings.

Maranda’s proficiency in airport land use compatibility planning makes her particularly competent in performing complex safety and noise impact assessments of various
types of land use projects proposed within vicinity of a wide range of commercial and GA airports.

Maranda is skilled in performing environmental analyses and preparing environmental documents under CEQA
in support of ALUCPs. She is keenly aware that although compatibility plans are not regulatory in nature, the plans have the potential to restrict future development around an airport. Maranda has significant experience in assessing potential impacts to local jurisdictions’ general plans, specific plans and zoning ordinances.

Maranda is presently working on two comprehensive
updates to airport land use compatibility plans for Marin and Napa counties, as well as airport land use compatibility on-calls for the counties of Placer, Nevada, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, and Sonoma County Airport in
California.

EDUCATION
y BA, Environmental Planning and Economics, Sonoma State University – California

CREDENTIALS
y Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP)

CURRENT LOCATION
y Windsor, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 23
Maranda Thompson, ENV SP
Airfield Planning
Corbett Smith is a senior airport planner
and project manager with more than
20 years of experience at Mead &
Hunt. He has led the development of
comprehensive planning documents
for a wide range of airports, from small
hub commercial service airports to GA
facilities.

With a strong foundation in aviation planning and
experience as a private pilot, Corbett brings a unique
perspective that integrates operational, community, and user considerations into practical and forward-looking
solutions.

Corbett serves as a project manager and lead planner on numerous airport master plans and airport layout plan (ALP) updates. His expertise also includes land use compatibility studies, noise analyses, Part 77 airspace evaluations, and emerging planning efforts such as helipad and vertiport siting studies, along with other specialized aviation
technical analyses.

Corbett is currently nearing completion as project manager for the Santa Barbara Airport (SBA) Master Plan Update.

This effort included an AAM component evaluating
potential electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) vertiport sites across the airport. Through a comprehensive alternatives analysis, a preferred site was identified and incorporated into the ALP. His recent project experience also includes a runway extension feasibility study for Ukiah Municipal Airport (UKI), a master plan for Shafter-Minter Field Airport (MIT), and multiple standalone ALP updates for airports throughout California.

EDUCATION
y BA, Environmental Planning, Sonoma State University – California

CREDENTIALS
y American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE), Certified Member (CM)
y Single-engine land private pilot

CURRENT LOCATION
y Windsor, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 20
Corbett Smith, CM
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 11 Architecture Lead
Joe Cruz is a seasoned project
manager and architect with over 25
years of experience in leadership
and delivering projects across the
science, technology, government,
military, and aviation sectors. With
a strong background in leadership
fostered through his time as an active-duty U.S. Air
Force Civil Engineer Officer, Joe provides coordination, collaboration, and decisive action in his project deliveries.

This background provides a foundation for leadership,
managing people and projects, and developing
relationships.

Joe leads multi-discipline teams in design projects from initial planning to construction completion. Joe is adept at listening to the needs of the clients, stakeholders, and communities affected by the built environment.

Joe serves as a project manager and architect on aviation projects to include terminal expansions and renovations, feasibility studies, aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) buildings, and other aviation related structures at airports large and small. His responsibilities include project
management, design, coordination, and construction
administration. As an integral member of the Mead & Hunt team, Joe also provides QC on other aviation projects
throughout the company.

His work spans a wide range of scales from tenant
improvements to full scale renovations at a major hub
airport. Joe has managed and designed aviation projects throughout the West and Mountain West regions.

EDUCATION
y BArch, Architecture, University of Notre Dame

CREDENTIALS
y National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA)
y American Institute of Architects (AIA)
y National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB)
y Registered Architect – CA, CO, NV

CURRENT LOCATION
y San Diego, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 5
Joe Cruz, NOMA, AIA, NCARB
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 12 Quality Assurance,
Sustainability &
Resiliency, & Construction
Administration Support
Jake Roberts has more than 22
years of civil design engineering
and construction experience. His
experience encompasses aviation design and construction management as well as municipal utility design and
warehouse design projects.

As a senior civil engineer, Jake has overseen and performed the design of the infrastructure supporting the aviation sector for airside and landside improvement projects in military and civilian aviation facilities. Jake was responsible for managing these projects with a comprehensive site
design of related infrastructure improvements.

Jake’s experience includes aviation airfield design,
industrial warehouse site design, storm water, sanitary sewer and water distribution design, street improvements, intersection improvements, utility coordination,
construction administration, and security fencing
improvements.

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA, NV, TX
y Envision Sustainability Professional (ENV SP)

CURRENT LOCATION
y Ontario, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 1
Jake Roberts, PE, ENV SP
Quality Control
Rafael Gonzalez has more than 29
years of civil design engineering and
construction experience in the U.S.,
Canada, and Mexico. He has worked as
design manager, senior engineer, and
project manager for numerous projects
in civilian and military aviation sectors.

As a senior civil engineer, Rafael has overseen and
performed the design of the infrastructure supporting
the aviation sector for airside and landside improvement projects in military and civilian aviation facilities. Rafael was responsible for providing these projects with a
comprehensive site design of related infrastructure
improvements.

Rafael’s experience includes roadway design, site design, storm water, sanitary sewer and water distribution design, street improvements, intersection improvements, utility coordination, construction administration, security fencing improvements, and quality assurance (QA) responsibilities.

Rafael is located in our Ontario, California office and he played an integral part in the completion of several airside and landside projects for ONT, MHV, RAL, BFL, and Big
Bear Airport (L35), among other airports in the Southern California region.

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil Engineering, Universidad Iberoamericana, Laguna Campus, Torreon, Coahuila, Mexico

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA, Mexico

CURRENT LOCATION
y Ontario, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 9
Rafael Gonzalez, PE
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 13 AAM/UAM/Energy
Planning & Sustainability
& Resiliency
Chad Reese is an environmental and
sustainability leader with more than
15 years of experience supporting
airports and public-sector agencies in
advancing climate resilience, decarbonization, and energy strategy. His work focuses on translating sustainability goals into practical, achievable programs that align with regulatory, operational, and funding requirements.

He previously served as Environmental Manager for the
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, where he led development and implementation of the Airport Authority’s Sustainability Management Program. His responsibilities included energy master planning, renewable energy
integration, electrification of airport operations, and development of greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories.

Through his work on airport climate adaptation plans,
energy master plans, and national research initiatives, he helps airport sponsors integrate sustainability into longterm planning and decision‑making while strengthening operational resilience.

EDUCATION
y MBA, Sustainable Management, Presidio Graduate School y BA, Biological Anthropology, University of California – San Diego

CREDENTIALS
y Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional in Building Design + Construction (LEED AP BD+C)
y TRUE Advisor

CURRENT LOCATION
y San Diego, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 1
Chad Reese, LEED AP BD+C, TRUE Advisor
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 14 Landside Planning
Kevin Smith has 30 years of
comprehensive experience in the
aviation industry and local government,
including serving as Airport Director
for the Truckee Tahoe Airport
District (TTAD). Kevin’s experience
encompasses supervising day-to-day operations while
balancing the long-term strategic direction of airports, municipalities, and complex organizations.

Kevin's background in managing and directing airport
and government agencies provides critical insight
into airport policy, compliance, and local government
perspectives for planning and research projects, as well as collaboration with airport stakeholders and local,
state, and federal agencies. He has extensive experience serving and supporting elected and appointed boards,
councils, and commissions. He regularly advises airports on master planning, system planning, commercial space
and spaceports, aviation and non-aviation land use
planning, hangar leasing and development, revenue
diversification, rates, fees, and charges, FAA coordination, airport administration, public outreach strategies, support of elected officials, and strategic planning.

EDUCATION
y MS, Urban Planning and Resource Management
(Geography), Brigham Young University
y BS, Planning and Resource Management, Brigham Young
University
y AA, Spanish, Ricks College

CREDENTIALS
y Accredited Airport Executive (AAE)

CURRENT LOCATION
y Reno, NV

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 4
Kevin Smith, AAE
Engineering Lead, Civil
Design
Edward Heitmann is a civil engineer
with good communication and
leadership skills. He has eight years
of experience in the industry working
almost exclusively on airfield projects,
both in the field and as a designer. He has worked as both a design engineer and as a field engineer for runway and taxiway rehabilitation projects, airfield marking projects, and has extensive design experience with airfield grading and drainage projects. His current responsibilities
include aviation design, QA/QC plan checks, technical
specification writing, client correspondence, and field engineering duties. He has experience with AutoCAD
Civil3D, FAARFIELD, and AviPLAN.

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Ontario, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 8
Edward Heitmann, PE
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 15 FAA ADO Coordination
Chuck McCormick has 38 years
of aviation experience, primarily
supporting Southern California
airports, with extensive expertise in
the design and construction of airfield
electrical systems for both civilian and
military facilities. He leads preliminary and final design, as well as construction administration, for airfield lighting, NAVAIDs, security systems, and other specialized airfield infrastructure.

Chuck spent 20 years with the FAA Airports Division in
Los Angeles as a national electrical engineer and lighting specialist, where he developed electrical design standards and provided guidance on the application of FAA criteria nationwide. He also served as an FAA project engineer,
supporting interpretation of airport design standards and AIP funding requirements.

Chuck brings both an FAA and pilot perspective to
projects, allowing him to balance technical requirements with operational needs. He effectively communicates
complex technical issues with airport staff, agencies, and stakeholders to support efficient coordination and delivery of practical, safety-focused solutions.

EDUCATION
y BS, Electronics and Computer Engineering, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona

CURRENT LOCATION
y Ontario, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 10
Chuck McCormick
Electrical
Bill Ropposch is an electrical engineer
with more than 38 years of experience
designing and supporting airport
electrical systems for both civilian and
military airfields. His expertise includes
the preliminary and final design of
airfield lighting systems, NAVAIDs, security systems, and other specialized electrical systems that support airfield improvement projects at commercial service and GA
airports. Bill regularly prepares detailed plans, technical specifications, engineering reports, and construction cost estimates for complex electrical infrastructure upgrades.

Throughout his career, Bill has designed power distribution and lighting systems, airport security and communications systems, airfield signage and marking, instrument
landing systems (ILS), approach lighting systems (ALS), and standby and emergency power systems. In addition
to his design responsibilities, he also provides project management and construction administration services,
ensuring that installation, testing, and commissioning
activities meet project requirements, safety standards, and FAA guidelines. Bill’s depth of experience and technical precision make him a trusted resource for airfield electrical design and implementation.

EDUCATION
y BS, Electrical Engineering, University of Detroit

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA, AZ, GA, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, MI,

MN, MO, ND, NE, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, SC, TX, UT, WA, WI

CURRENT LOCATION
y Traverse City, MI

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 16
Bill Ropposch, PE
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 16 Electrical
Ethan Vink is an electrical engineer
with over three years of engineering
experience, including more than one
year focused on aviation electrical
systems. His experience includes
lighting analysis and CAD design for
airfield lighting systems, including runway and taxiway lighting layouts, apron lighting, electrical vault equipment, and underground circuits. He has supported projects
ranging from GA to medium- and large-hub airports across the U.S., demonstrating a strong understanding of FAA
requirements and National Electrical Code compliance.

Ethan also has experience developing cost estimates,
preparing technical specifications, and coordinating
with project teams to deliver accurate and constructible designs.

In addition to design, Ethan has served as an on-site
observer and resident project representative (RPR) for
airfield electrical projects. This hands-on experience
allows Ethan to bridge design and construction, helping to resolve field conditions efficiently and support successful project delivery

EDUCATION
y BS, Electrical Engineering, Grand Valley State University

CREDENTIALS
y Engineer-in-Training (EIT) – CA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Ontario, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 2
Ethan Vink, EIT
Hydrology & Stormwater
Quality
Bob Thayne has more than 24 years of
civil engineering experience, including
extensive analysis and design work in
water resources. Bob has generated
numerous hydrology and hydraulics
models. His roles have included project planning, analysis and design, construction management, and inspection on
projects that include large culvert replacements, stream restoration, storm drain systems, stormwater retrofits, and in-stream sanitary sewer repairs. Bob is versed in numerous hydrologic and hydraulic models, including HEC-RAS,
HSPF-based models, XPSWMM, HydroCAD, and the
Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM), using
continuous simulation hydrology. His ability to provide efficient project solutions is rounded out with related experience in stormwater master planning, floodplain
analysis, low-impact development design, and roadway
design.

EDUCATION
y MS, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of California – Irvine
y BS, Civil Engineering, Walla Walla University

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA, AZ, CO, OR, WA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Portland, OR

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 10
Bob Thayne, PE
Architectural Services
Nathan Clifford has more than 12 years
of architectural design experience. He
specializes in design through creative
visualization and is experienced
in Revit, CAD, Sketchup, Rhino,
Grasshopper, Maxwell, Microsoft
Office, and Adobe Creative Suite. Nathan has worked on
multiple facility projects from conception through design and construction to completion. His responsibilities
and skills include architectural design, preparation of specifications, drawings, documents, graphical renderings and presentations, multi-discipline team communication, and BIM modeling.

As a project architect, Nathan represents the client
with diligence and sound approaches to design. He
is experienced at coordinating multi-discipline teams
through complex projects, meeting budget and
program requirements. He is passionate about building
performance, user experience, and healthy building
design.

EDUCATION
y MA, Architecture, Portland State University
y BS, Architecture, Portland State University

CREDENTIALS
y Registered Architect – CA, OR, PA
y American Institute of Architects (AIA)
y National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB)
y WELL AP

CURRENT LOCATION
y San Diego, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 11
Nathan Clifford, AIA, NCARB, WELL AP
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 17 Construction
Administration Support
Mike Leraas has over 30 years of
experience, as well as a vast and deep
understanding of the construction
of critical infrastructure facilities,
commercial construction, and civil
engineering projects. His responsibilities include the daily construction observation of large hangar developments
and airfield pavement and safety area improvement
projects.

Mike excels at coordinating construction schedules and
activities with the airport team, air traffic control staff, airport users, and contractors to see that all involved are aware of activities, haul routes, and safety compliance.

Advance coordination and proactive communication
with permitting agencies during construction streamlines project approvals and acceptance.

EDUCATION
y AS, Business Management, West Valley College – Saratoga y AS, Aviation Administration, San Diego Miramar College y AS, Construction Tech, San Diego Mesa College

CURRENT LOCATION
y San Diego, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 8
Mike Leraas
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION
Environmental Support
In Joan George’s 28 years of
experience, she has participated at
all levels within the cultural resource
management industry with projects
ranging from survey and site recording;
testing and data recovery; National
Register eligibility evaluations; buried site testing (backhoe trenching); development of monitoring plans; technical
report production; and compliance assistance for National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and CEQA projects. Joan has developed close relationships with tribal groups and individuals throughout Southern California. She has played a critical role in providing consultation support between agencies and Native American groups for Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) and Section 106 of the NHPA. Joan has authored, co-authored, and contributed to dozens of CEQA, Section 106 of the NHPA, and NEPA compliance reports since
2004.

Joan has archaeological experience at complex sites
throughout Southern California, such as the State Route 79 Realignment Project, multiple projects for the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) Inland Feeder
Project, and the Eastside Reservoir Project in Riverside County. For the last 15 years, she has served as project manager on dozens of Phase I, Phase II, and archaeological monitoring projects throughout Southern California. Joan has also served as environmental contract manager for the County of Riverside’s Transportation Department On-Call Environmental Services Contract since December 2017.

EDUCATION
y BS, Physical Anthropology, University of California – Davis

CREDENTIALS
y Registered Archaeologist (RA)

CURRENT LOCATION
y Hemet, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 28
Joan George, RA

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 18 Environmental Support
Jason Caskey’s experience lies in
biological resource management
which includes biological surveys,
assessments and data collection along
with environmental and biological
compliance inspection and monitoring.

Jason has conducted, staffed, and managed numerous
projects that included special-status species surveys and construction compliance monitoring.

Jason has supported Mead & Hunt on numerous projects
throughout the State of California including airport projects in San Bernardino County, Ontario County, and Riverside County. Recent projects include biological surveys
in support of NEPA/CEQA compliance for Air Traffic
Control Tower (ATCT) studies at the Jacqueline Cochran
Regional Airport (TRM) and the French Valley Airport
(F70), and burrowing owl studies in support of the taxiway standardization program for the Chino Airport (CNO).

EDUCATION
y BS, Biology, Minor in Chemistry, University of the Ozarks

CURRENT LOCATION
y Carlsbad, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 13
Jason Caskey
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION
Survey
Lam Le brings 31 years of
comprehensive experience in land
surveying, with a strong background
as a project manager or project
surveyor. His technical expertise spans
a wide range of surveying and drafting
disciplines, including using MicroStation InRoads and Civil 3D, the creation of digital terrain models for earthwork quantity calculations, road profiling, and generating
documents for boundary analysis. Lam plays a vital role in project management and coordination, overseeing all
phases of survey execution while also providing essential field support on a diverse array of projects. His deep
knowledge of computer-aided design and drafting tools
ensures the delivery of precise and efficient survey data.

Throughout his career, Lam has developed numerous
legal descriptions for easements, lot line adjustments, and property boundaries. He has conducted extensive title
research and analysis to support property establishment and ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, contributing to the
successful completion of both public infrastructure and private development projects.

EDUCATION
y BS, Aerospace Engineering, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Land Surveyor (PLS) – CA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Corona, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 19
Lam Le, PLS

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 19 Survey
Dan Calvillo is a seasoned professional
with 26 years of experience in the
land surveying industry. As Director
of Field Operations at CL Survey, he
leads a highly skilled and dedicated
team, guiding the successful execution
of a wide range of complex and high-profile projects. His experience includes major transportation infrastructure developments, roadway and street enhancements,
bridge widenings, and grade separation projects, each
demanding precision, coordination, and strategic
oversight.

With deep expertise in field surveying technologies
and methodologies, Dan is recognized for his ability to streamline operations and implement innovative solutions that drive efficiency and accuracy. His leadership has been instrumental in developing robust field procedures that consistently deliver results by meeting critical deadlines and optimizing project costs. Dan’s technical insight and hands-on approach make him a vital asset to the clients he serves.

EDUCATION
y BS, Construction Management, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Land Surveyor (PLS) – CA, UT

CURRENT LOCATION
y Corona, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 19
Dan Calvillo, PLS
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 20 Hydrology & Stormwater
Quality
Craig Di Bias has over 39 years of
experience with Truxaw, being involved
in all aspects of the civil engineering and
land surveying services provided by the company. In his role, Craig is responsible for directing the administration of the firm as well as management of the civil engineering and land surveying operations performed by the Truxaw team.

Craig specializes in civil engineering, water quality design, development of cost-effective design solutions, QC,
constructability oversight, and project management,
along with directing the engineering design on numerous company projects. He is also responsible for oversight
and management of the survey department and many
survey projects performed by the company. Craig works
closely with the company’s professional land surveyors to ensure that the client’s expectations are being met and that effective communication is provided.

EDUCATION
y BS, Engineering Technology, Emphasis in Construction
Management, California State University – Long Beach

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA, AZ, CO, NV, UT, WA
y Qualified Stormwater Developer/Practitioner (QSD/P)
y Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP)

CURRENT LOCATION
y Orange, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 39
Craig Di Bias, PE, QSD/P, LEED AP
Joseph C. Truxaw
and Associates,
Inc. does not
share employee
headshots
Geotechnical
Sammy Daghighi has over 33
years of professional expertise in
civil engineering, geotechnical
engineering, and construction
management. His background includes
extensive experience in construction
QA/QC, deep foundation specialty engineering, and
geotechnical engineering operations management.

Over his three decades as a civil engineer, Sammy has
worked on a broad range of project types from K-12 and
community colleges to public works and infrastructure
projects for agencies such as airports, roadways, bridges, municipal water systems, and ports, built to a wide
range of specifications including the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Caltrans, and the Division of the State Architect (DSA).

EDUCATION
y BS, Civil Engineering, Azad University, Iran

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Long Beach, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 8
Sammy Daghighi, PE
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION
Geotechnical
Paul Soltis brings over 34 years of
technical expertise to Twining. His
experience includes geotechnical
investigations and analyses relative to
the development of transportation, rail,
landfill, airport and roadway, and water
resource facilities. He has expertise in bridge foundation and pavement design support and investigations, including Foundation Reports and Materials Reports prepared in
accordance with FAA and Caltrans requirements. His
experience also includes geotechnical site investigations using cone penetration testing and hollow stem auger,
mud rotary, air rotary, and bucket auger drilling.

EDUCATION
y MS, Geotechnical Engineering, University of Colorado – Boulder
y BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo

CREDENTIALS
y Professional Engineer (PE) – CA
y Geotechnical Engineer (GE) – CA

CURRENT LOCATION
y Long Beach, CA

YEARS WITH FIRM
y 21
Paul Soltis, PE, GE

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 21 KEY PERSONNEL & ROLE Current & Anticipated Workload Availability Eric Loera, PE
Project Manager, Construction
Administration Lead, Civil Design &
Engineering, & Pavement Analysis
y Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (SBA) Taxiway Design
y Brackett Field Airport (POC) Runway 8L-26R, Taxiway N, & Connector Taxiways Design
y Los Angeles County Public Works, Department of Airports On-Call
60%
Jeff Leonard, PE
Principal-In-Charge, CSPP, &
Pavement Analysis
y Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (SBA) Taxiway Design
y San Diego International Airport (SAN) On-Call 30%
Cameron Morrow, EIT, ENV SP
Deputy Project Manager, Civil
Design & Engineering, CSPP,
Pavement Analysis, & Construction
Administration Support
y Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (SBA) Taxiway Design
y San Luis Obispo County Airport (SBP) On-Call 60%
Lisa Harmon
Planning & Environmental Lead &
AAM/UAM/Energy Planning
y On-Call Planning Support for Riverside County Airports y On-Call Planning Support for Contra Costa County Airports 50%
Maranda Thompson, ENV SP
AAM/UAM/Energy Planning &
Land Use Compatibility
y Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) Airport Climate Adaptation Action Plan (ACAAP)
y Marin County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) y Buchanan Field Airport (CCR) Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) On-Call Services
40%
Corbett Smith, CM
Airfield Planning
y Stockton Metropolitan Airport (SCK) Master Plan
y Hollywood Burbank Airport (BUR) Part 150 Study
y Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) Part 150 Study
y Barstow-Daggett Airport (DAG) Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Update y Meadows Field Airport (BFL) Master Plan
40%
Joe Cruz, NOMA, AIA, NCARB
Architecture Lead
y San Diego International Airport (SAN) On-Call
y City of Phoenix Aviation On-Call
40%
Jake Roberts, PE, ENV SP
Quality Assurance, Sustainability
& Resiliency, & Construction
Administration Support
y Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) Baggage Handling System and Checked Baggage Inspection System Construction Management
y Peleliu Airfield Design
y Cable Airport (CCB) Hangar and Parking Lot Design
50%
Rafael Gonzalez, PE
Quality Control
y Mojave Air & Space Port (MHV) On-Call
y Riverside Airport (RAL) Runway Safety Area (RSA) Improvement Design
y Ontario International Airport (ONT) On-Call
40%
3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 22 3 PROPOSED STAFFING & ORGANIZATION

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 23 KEY PERSONNEL & ROLE Current & Anticipated Workload Availability Chad Reese, LEED AP BD+C,
TRUE Advisor
AAM/UAM/Energy Planning &
Sustainability & Resiliency
y San Antonio International (SAT) Airport Energy Master Plan y Napa County Airport (APC) Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Energy Study
40%
Kevin Smith, AAE
Landside Planning
y Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEE) Gillespie Field Planning Study
y Yuba County Airport (MYV) Planning & Engineering On-Call y Bellingham International Airport (BLI) Industrial Park Development Study
y Mojave Air & Space Port (MHV) Planning On-Call
35%
Edward Heitmann, PE
Engineering Lead, Civil Design
y Riverside County Aviation On-Call
y Ontario International Airport (ONT) On-Call
y Cable Airport (CCB) Hangar and Parking Lot Design
50%
Chuck McCormick
FAA ADO Coordination
y Mojave Air & Space Port (MHV) On-Call
y San Bernardino County On-Call
y Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (SBA) Taxiway Design
50%
Bill Ropposch, PE
Electrical
y Cherry Capital Airport (TVC) Terminal Building Addition, Existing Building Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Replacement, and Site Work
y Columbus Air Force Base Airfield Lighting Replacement 35%
Ethan Vink, EIT
Electrical
y Blythe Airport (BLH) Security Gate and Apron Lighting y Chino Airport (CNO) Taxiway Design
y Francisco Bangoy International Airport (DVO) Levee and Runway 13-31 Extension
40%
Bob Thayne, PE
Hydrology & Stormwater Quality
y Grand Junction Regional Airport (GJT) Runway Transition y Santa Barbara Airport (SBA) Carneros Creek Maintenance and Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
y King County International Airport - Boeing Field (BFI) Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Relocation
20%
Nathan Clifford, AIA, NCARB,

WELL AP
Architectural Services
y McClellan Palomar Airport (CLD) Terminal Area Plan
y Bremerton National Airport (PWT) Terminal Assessment
y Durango-La Plata County Airport (DRO) Terminal Expansion 50%
Mike Leraas
Construction Administration
Support
y Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) Baggage Handling System and Checked Baggage Inspection System Construction Management
75%
Detailed
Work Plan 4

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 24 Mead & Hunt will deliver the services outlined in the City’s Scope of Work through collaboration, dedication, effective communication, and a commitment to outstanding service. We have helped hundreds of airport clients through every step, from identifying funding alternatives and addressing eligibility criteria to secure funding, leading design, construction administration, and project closeout. Mead & Hunt is committed to supporting the needs of FUL, and we will respond to each request accurately, efficiently, and with the help of team members with targeted expertise. Additionally, our nationwide team of aviation engineers and planners stands ready to support the City in its future projects at FUL.

Mead & Hunt has an excellent reputation for delivering projects in the FAA Western Pacific Region. Mead & Hunt is known by the FAA Los Angeles Airport District Office (ADO) and the Western Pacific Region Airports Division for our ability to take on complex projects and exceed expectations in both technical delivery and project management. Our California team has been recognized by the FAA as one of the best technical and project management teams they have worked with.

Our approach will demonstrate our understanding of the work involved and the strategic assembly of a qualified, multidisciplinary team with the goal of efficiently advancing these projects. For each of the federally funded FAA AIP projects at FUL, we will complete the design packages, plans, specifications, and required feasibility and planning studies meeting the FAA ADO requirements for AIP grant award and execution.

Southeast Hangar Rehabilitation Phases 1/2 FY2026/FY2027

GENERAL APPROACH
Our architecture and engineering design team is well versed in renovation and rehabilitation of facilities at airports and understands the implications of the design and construction process. A successful project will achieve the Airport’s goals for the Southeast Hangar by managing the scope, schedule, and budget for the renovation. Close coordination with other Airport projects will be part of the scope in order to take advantage of opportunities for economy of scale, project phasing, and Airport management.

Prior to design, the team will visit the site and confirm the current condition of the hangar and meet with the Airport and its stakeholders, if desired by the Airport. The site evaluation will include an assessment of the facility through an architecture and engineering lens. During design, all current code requirements will be applied to the project, and estimation of project costs will be provided. A phasing plan for how construction would sequence would be collaborated between the Airport and design team to ensure continuity of operations and minimize disruption to hangar tenants. The design team would introduce the project to the City permitting department to streamline plan review and discuss significant issues with the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).

After permitting, the design team will work with the City’s procurement office and provide bid support through project award.

During construction, the design team will engage in construction administration to review requests for information (RFIs), review submittals, and provide support to the Airport.

South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and Markings Rehabilitation FY2028

GENERAL APPROACH
Our team understands what it takes to safely and efficiently execute complex pavement rehabilitation projects of aircraft parking ramps while preserving airport operations. The South Aircraft Parking Ramp serves as the primary GA parking for tenants, visitors, and fixed base operators (FBOs) General Aviation Company and Aviation Facilities Inc. (AFI), making construction phasing and operational coordination critical to minimizing impacts to airfield operations. From a previous statewide Caltrans APMP, the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the South Aircraft Parking Ramp was identified as “fair,” indicating that a mill-and-overlay of the existing flexible pavement could extend its functional and structural life, provided loading-related distresses are not present.

During design, Mead & Hunt recommends pavement coring throughout the South Aircraft Parking Ramp to confirm cracking depth and distress mechanisms (top-down versus bottom-up cracking). This evaluation, performed by our subconsultant Twining, will be used to validate mill depths and refine the overlay and preventative maintenance strategy.

Drawing on extensive experience with similar analyses at other airports, Mead & Hunt will develop and evaluate multiple rehabilitation alternatives and perform cost-benefit analyses to identify the most effective solution.

Concurrently or prior to the South Aircraft Parking Ramp Rehabilitation Project, our team proposes analyzing painting of no-taxi islands, utilizing green paint, to address direct access from the ramp to Runway 6-24 as part of the ALP update to be performed following FAA design procedures. If a complete ALP update cannot be completed before or concurrently with the rehabilitation project, an ALP (Pen & Ink) would be recommended to illustrate the placement of the no-taxi islands and proposed aircraft parking configuration. Additionally, it is also recommended to analyze the new tie-down parking configuration as part of the ALP update to maximize the capacity and efficiency of the existing aircraft parking configuration.

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 25 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Design Development (60% Design)
1 Kick-off Meeting & Site Investigation
2 60% Design Analysis
Apply Building Code Requirements to Plans,
Roofing & Rain Gutter Design, Electrical Design,
Construction Phasing Concepts
3 Prepare 60% Plans & EDR
4 60% Design: City & FAA Review
Contract Documents (90% Design)
5 Develop Design for City-Approved Alternatives
6 Construction Safety & Phasing Plan
7 Project Specifications, Plans, EDR
8 90% Design: City & FAA Review
Bid Documents & Permitting Support
9 Bid Documents & Permitting Support
10 Bid Administration (Estimated Spring 2027 to
Meet FAA Grant Deadlines)
Task Month/Week 1 2 3 4
Jul ‘26
1 2 3 4
Aug ‘26
1 2 3 4
Sep ‘26
1 2 3 4
Oct ‘26
1 2 3 4
Nov ‘26
1 2 3 4
Dec ‘26
NOTE: Construction Administration tasks would have a tentative start of Fall of the next Fiscal Year based on FAA grant timing and previous project experience. Schedule may be pushed up if grant is received early, weather is favorable, and material procurement lead times can be reduced. Phase 2 of the Project would be completed under a subsequent grant for work not performed as a part of Phase 1.

General Schedule – Southeast Hangar Rehabilitation
Phases 1/2 FY2026/FY2027

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 26 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
PROPOSED Project Development
SOURCE: AERIAL: Google Earth Pro, 2026. SCALE: Not to Scale. NORTH Taxiway C (Taxiway
Design Group B-1 Fillets)
E
D
C
A
Proposed
No-Taxi Islands
Taxiway D (Taxiway
Design Group B-1 Fillets)
Taxiway E (Taxiway
Design Group B-1 Fillets)

SOUTH AIRCRAFT PARKING
RUNWAY 6-24
General Schedule – South Aircraft Parking Ramp Pavement and Markings Rehabilitation FY2028
Preliminary Design
1 Kick-off Meeting & Site Investigation
2 Geotechnical Investigation & Lab Analysis
3 Topographic Survey & Data Processing
4 Preliminary Design Analysis
Phasing Design, Geometrical Design,
Drainage Design, Pavement Markings Design,
Construction Phasing Concepts
5 Prepare Preliminary Plans & EDR
6 Preliminary Design: City & FAA Review
60% Design
7 Develop Design for City-Approved Alternatives
8 Construction Safety & Phasing Plan
9 Project Specifications, Plans, EDR
10 60% Design: City & FAA Review
90% Design
11 Project Specifications, Plans, EDR, CSPP
12 90% Design: City & FAA Review
Bid Documents
13 Bid Administration (Estimated Spring 2029 to
Meet FAA Grant Deadlines)
Task Month/Week 1 2 3 4
Jul ‘28
1 2 3 4
Aug ‘28
1 2 3 4
Sep ‘28
1 2 3 4
Oct ‘28
1 2 3 4
Nov ‘28
1 2 3 4
Dec ‘28
NOTE: Construction Administration tasks would have a tentative start of Fall of the next Fiscal Year based on FAA grant timing and previous project experience. Schedule may be pushed up if grant is received early, weather is favorable, and material procurement lead times can be reduced.

The operational strategy recommendation would be closely coordinated during design with FUL operations and ATCT to assess feasibility and operational impacts during construction.

Airport Layout Plan Update

GENERAL APPROACH
Mead & Hunt will approach the ALP updates for FUL through a comprehensive, FAA-aligned methodology that integrates technical rigor, operational insight, and proactive coordination. Our process is grounded in full compliance with FAA AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design – Change 1, ensuring that all airfield geometry and facilities are planned to meet current design standards while supporting safe, efficient airport operations. Early and ongoing coordination with the FAA is a cornerstone of our approach, allowing us to resolve design considerations in real time and streamline the ALP approval process.

In parallel, Mead & Hunt brings deep expertise in AAM planning, enabling us to thoughtfully evaluate how new aviation technologies may be integrated into the airport environment. For FUL, this includes identifying and preserving space within the ALP for future vertiport development, energy infrastructure, and necessary setbacks, while ensuring compatibility with existing operations and maintaining flexibility for long-term implementation.

A key focus of Mead & Hunt’s ALP updates is the evaluation and refinement of taxiway geometry to enhance safety and usability. Consistent with AC 150/5300-13B guidance, our team emphasizes clear, predictable taxi routes that improve pilot situational awareness and reduce the potential for runway incursions. This includes reconfiguring taxiway connectors to incorporate standard intersection angles, eliminating unnecessary pavement, and introducing defined turning movements where appropriate. These refinements are particularly important at airports like FUL, where constrained airfield layouts and high GA activity require careful balancing of efficiency and safety.

An essential component of this effort is the identification and elimination of direct access connections from aprons to the runway. FAA guidance discourages these configurations because they can allow aircraft to enter the runway environment without a clear, controlled transition, thereby increasing the potential for conflicts. Mead & Hunt systematically evaluates existing airfield layouts to identify these conditions and develop reconfigured taxiway systems that require intentional turning movements prior to runway entry.

For FUL, this approach results in an ALP that not only reflects current conditions and planned development, but also proactively resolves nonstandard design elements while positioning the Airport for future innovation. By integrating FAA design standards, operational best practices, and forward-looking AAM considerations, including preservation of a potential vertiport site, Mead & Hunt will deliver an ALP update that is implementable, defensible, and aligned with longterm Airport development goals. This process ultimately provides a clear path forward for capital improvements and FAA approval.

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 27 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
1 Data Collection/Inventory
2 Forecasts of Aviation Demand
3 Facility Requirements
4 Alternatives Development & Evaluation
5 Airport Noise Analysis
6 Capital Improvement Plan
7 Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Set
8 Prepare Narrative Report (Dra/Final Report)
9 Submit Dra/Final Report and ALP to FAA
Task Month

JULAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDEC
NOTE: The ALP Update may be performed before or concurrently with other projects. Start of the project is based on FAA grant timing and previous project experience.

General Schedule – Airport Layout Plan Update

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 28 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
AAM/UAM Feasibility and Planning Study

GENERAL APPROACH
Advancing Fullerton’s AAM Vision Through Integrated Planning Mead & Hunt brings a forward-looking, implementation-focused approach to airport planning that integrates AAM and energy infrastructure into traditional aviation planning. Our multidisciplinary team of aviation and land use planners, pilots, environmental scientists, former airport managers, and former FAA staff deliver practical, implementation-ready solutions that support both current operations and emerging technologies.

Our approach aligns directly with the City’s proactive leadership in advancing AAM.

Through its partnership with Wisk Aero, the City has already established a strong foundation for integrating autonomous, all-electric air taxi operations at FUL, including infrastructure, airspace, policy, and electrical grid considerations.

Mead & Hunt will build on this momentum by delivering strategic, integrated planning that ensures continuity, avoids duplication, and accelerates implementation. Our approach builds upon this foundation by translating FUL's AAM vision into coordinated, actionable planning strategies that integrate AAM and energy infrastructure into ongoing Airport development.

Integrated Planning Framework
We approach AAM and energy planning as part of a unified airport system rather than stand-alone efforts. Our approach:
Integrates AAM into ALPs, facility planning, and capital improvement programming Assesses vertiport siting for compatibility with airspace, operational requirements, existing airport facilities, and surrounding land uses
Evaluates connectivity with regional vertiport networks and multimodal transportation systems Positions FUL as a strategic node within the broader AAM ecosystem Aligns electrification and energy demand planning with phased airside and landside development Ensures consistency with FAA guidance and evolving AAM policy frameworks Embeds resilience, sustainability, and operational feasibility into all recommendations Airport Electrification Strategy
As AAM, electric aircraft, and ground fleets increase energy demand, Mead & Hunt integrates energy planning into airport development to ensure systems are scalable, resilient, and aligned with long-term growth. We forecast near- and long-term electrical demand across airport systems to:
Evaluate charging infrastructure needs for eVTOLs, conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) aircraft, electric ground support equipment (GSE), and tenant operations
Coordinate with utility providers to assess capacity, redundancy, and system resilience Identify opportunities for renewable energy, microgrids, and battery storage Ensure energy infrastructure can scale to support regional AAM network growth Regulatory and Environmental Alignment
Our California experience ensures all recommendations are practical, compliant, and implementable. We will:
Coordinate CEQA/NEPA pathways early to streamline project delivery Identify permitting strategies and regulatory approvals for AAM infrastructure through coordination with FAA, Caltrans, and local jurisdictions
Integrate AAM considerations into the broader community, including land use policy frameworks addressing vertiport siting, noise, safety, low-altitude overflights, airspace, and overall land use compatibility

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 29 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Stakeholder Engagement and Community Integration
Recognizing that AAM introduces new technologies and community considerations, Mead & Hunt emphasizes proactive, transparent community engagement by:
Using proven AAM outreach tools and strategies to educate stakeholders and build awareness Coordinating with City staff, tenants, operators, regional partners, and surrounding communities to align planning assumptions
Supporting transparent, decision-making processes that build trust and consensus Maintaining flexibility to adapt to evolving AAM technologies, regulatory conditions, and community expectations The City of Fullerton is actively positioning itself as a leader in autonomous AAM deployment in Southern California. Mead & Hunt is uniquely qualified to support the City in preparing for next-generation aviation technologies by advancing the City’s efforts from vision to planning and implementation.

MANAGING RESOURCES
We proactively forecast project workloads on a year-round basis to clearly understand staff's availability and capacity. These labor projections are carefully evaluated before we pursue additional work or make staffing commitments to our clients.

Project teams meet weekly to review schedules, workloads, and resource needs, allowing potential conflicts to be identified and resolved early. When necessary, we adjust staffing plans and allocate additional resources to meet milestone dates and maintain project schedules. Key Personnel will not be substituted without City approval.

APPROACH TO QA/QC ASSURANCE
Mead & Hunt’s success delivering large, complex airport improvement programs is grounded in a disciplined and proactive QA/QC process. Our QA framework establishes the procedures that guide project delivery, while our QC program provides the structured reviews and documentation needed to consistently produce high‑quality deliverables.

Eric Loera (Project Manager) and Jeff Leonard (Principal-In-Charge), in coordination with Cameron Morrow (Deputy Project Manager), will prepare a project‑specific Quality Management Plan (QMP) in collaboration with the FUL team. The QMP defines responsibilities, review milestones, and documentation requirements tailored to this project.

Quality reviews occur continuously as work is developed, rather than only at formal submittal milestones, allowing issues to be identified and resolved early. At key milestones, independent multidisciplinary technical reviews, led by Jake Roberts (QA Lead) and Rafael Gonzalez (QC Lead), are performed, including constructability reviews and QA/QC audits. This layered, independent review approach strengthens technical quality, confirms compliance with FUL requirements, and reduces downstream risk during construction.

Originator Checker Independent Technical Reviewer
Standards

QUALITY CONTROL PROCESS
Deliverables Detail Check
Revise
and Progress
Deliverable
Technical
Review
Revise
& Repeat
Detail Check
Back
Check
Document
Process
and File
Satisfactory
Deliverable

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 30 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Change Management
A structured change management process is integrated into the QA/QC program to ensure that scope, schedule, budget, and safety impacts are promptly identified, evaluated, and addressed in coordination with the FUL team. Eric will gather input on challenges and risks related to safety, quality, schedule, and budget; confirm the scope of changes; and develop preliminary cost and schedule estimates, prioritizing the timely resumption of work.

Conclusion
Mead & Hunt operates as an extension of the Airport’s staff by anticipating needs, communicating proactively, and managing design and coordination with the singular goal of delivering a well‑executed project. Our success is measured not only by the technical quality of the final deliverables, but by the confidence, trust, and satisfaction of our clients and stakeholders throughout the process.

Our team provides the leadership and technical depth to fully own this Scope of Work from day one through closeout.

With the extensive pavement rehabilitation experience of Eric Loera, Jeff Leonard, and Cameron Morrow; the AAM/UAM planning and feasibility study experience of Maranda Thompson and Lisa Harmon; Joe Cruz’s experience and knowledge on airfield building facility improvements; and Corbett Smith’s extensive experience completing dozens of ALP updates, this collective leadership enables Mead & Hunt to confidently execute projects on schedule, within budget, and with a level of service that builds lasting partnerships. With proven experience on similar projects, dedicated resources, and the flexibility to adapt to evolving funding and scheduling constraints, Mead & Hunt is committed to supporting FUL’s long-term infrastructure goals and enhancing safety for Airport users.

Backed by decades of aviation experience, our approach reflects consistent performance and a strong commitment to your success. Mead & Hunt is the right team to deliver the full suite of architectural, engineering, planning, and environmental services to support your ACIP and priority projects at FUL.

ALL-INCLUSIVE

IN-HOUSE

AVIATION

EXPERTISE

EXTENSIVE GA

EXPERIENCE

NATIONAL FIRM

WITH LOCAL
PRESENCE +
FOCUS
Airport planning +
engineering services for
airports large and small
across the U.S.

Proven experience helping
GA airports plan for future
growth.

Staffed by local professionals
who live nearby and are
personally invested in the
Airport’s success and the
surrounding community.

WHY MEAD & HUNT

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 31 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Airport Owner: City of Santa Barbara
A/E Contract Value: $1M
Construction Cost: N/A
Project Manager: Corbett Smith
Funding Source: FAA Grant,
ALP Approved June 2026
Project Details
After experiencing significant growth in enplanements and new airline service, SBA determined that an update to its prior airport master plan was appropriate. Mead & Hunt was selected and Corbett Smith is serving as the project manager for this ongoing work.

The master plan is addressing the following key elements:
y Preparing the airport for coming trends in aviation, including:
Passenger airline growth and its effect on related facilities Aircraft electrification and sustainable aviation fuels y Promoting airport financial resiliency through:
Identifying aeronautical and non-aeronautical development opportunities Developing infrastructure that is eligible for, and attracts, federal and state investment
y Addressing known and foreseeable environmental challenges Evaluating the effects of proposed development on airfield drainage, flooding, and runoff
Considering known cultural resource sites
Evaluating the potential effect on threatened and endangered species present on and near the airport
y Involving on- and off-airport stakeholders in the process by:
Preparing master plan in an open and transparent manner Providing opportunities for input and feedback at key decision points Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (SBA), Santa Barbara, CA

MASTER PLAN

PLANNING
Airport Owner: Riverside County
Aviation Division
A/E Contract Value: $100,000
Construction Cost: N/A
Project Manager: Lisa Harmon
Funding Source: FAA AIP Grant
Funds
Project Details
Mead & Hunt has provided on-call planning support services to Riverside County airports under several consecutive on-call contracts, during which time we have supported the county’s efforts to achieve environmental compliance pursuant to NEPA and CEQA for a variety of airside and landside projects. Our services have included:
y Environmental Resource Studies. Our staff has conducted numerous environmental investigations, including biological studies, wetland delineations, cultural resource assessments, paleontological studies, and special-status species surveys, and assisted with regulatory approvals, Section 106 compliance, and Native American consultation. We have also completed Management Plans at TRM, F70, and Hemet-Ryan Airport (HMT).
y NEPA/CEQA Documentation. Mead & Hunt has prepared NEPA categorical exclusion (CATEX) documentation for pavement, electrical, taxiway, and hangar projects and recently circulated two CEQA Mitigated Negative Declarations for ATCTs at Riverside County airports. Our documents are routinely accepted with few or no comments from agencies, including the FAA.

Riverside County Airports, Riverside County, CA

ON-CALL PLANNING SUPPORT SERVICES

ENVIRONMENTAL

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 32 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Airport Owner: Mojave Air & Space
Port
A/E Contract Value: $2M
Construction Cost: $15M (to date)
Project Manager: Rafael Gonzalez
Funding Source: FAA, Caltrans, Local
Project Details
Mead & Hunt maintains an On-Call Services Agreement with MHV that supports a variety of environmental services. Mead & Hunt routinely develops environmental documentation to achieve compliance with NEPA and CEQA. We have provided NEPA and CEQA documentation to support runway and taxiway rehabilitation projects.

During the past five years we have assisted the Airport District to gain environmental clearance for various airfield rehabilitation projects, an aircraft run-up apron, and to support the construction of an airport perimeter road. We routinely review project applications and environmental documents associated with proposed solar and wind power facilities in the airport vicinity to determine their potential to affect aircraft operations and to prevent encroachment.

Mojave Air & Space Port (MHV), Mojave, CA

ON-CALL SERVICES
Airport Owner: City of Merced
A/E Contract Value: $2.6M
Construction Cost: $15.5M
Project Manager: Joe Cruz
Funding Source: FAA AIP Grant
Funds
Project Details
MCE is currently operating with outdated and undersized infrastructure, as well as experiencing potential passenger growth. To address the short-term and longterm terminal area development needs and to provide a program for practical implementation, the City of Merced has elected to replace the current commercial service terminal through the construction of a new commercial 10,865-square-foot service terminal building. Associated site improvements include the reconstruction of the terminal area parking lot, aircraft apron and taxiway pavements, and extension of utilities to serve the new terminal building.

The one-story building design pays homage to the existing terminal building located across the parking lot with the use of a standing seam metal butterfly roof design at its center. The roof extends over the main public portions of the terminal and creates tall open areas for the flow of passengers traveling to and from Merced. The public spaces are also expressed with the use of large spans of glazing. An airport administration area located to the west of the public areas is expressed with the use of shorter, more solid volumes. The exterior building materials consist of three types of metal panel systems, ensuring longevity of the building for years to come, while adding visual interest through their application. The interior and exterior color palette draws inspiration from the natural surroundings of the Merced and Yosemite area.

Merced Regional Airport (MCE), Merced, CA

TERMINAL REPLACEMENT PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL/ARCHITECTURE

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 33 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Airport Owner: City of Santa Barbara
A/E Contract Value: $1M
Construction Cost: $8.8M
Project Manager: Jeff Leonard
Funding Source: FAA AIP Grant
Funds and Local Reserves
Project Details
The Taxiways D, A1, B1, and F Pavement Improvements and Terminal Apron Repair Project at SBA improved pavement conditions through rehabilitation of taxiways and reconstruction of approximately 3,800 square yards of terminal apron pavement near Gates 1 and 2. The project also included geometric improvements to Taxiway Connectors A1 and B1, including development of a new connector (A2), width modifications, and installation of upgraded airfield lighting and signage.

Mead & Hunt completed design in March 2024, with construction from April to September 2025. Design efforts included pavement evaluation using geotechnical data and FAARFIELD, reconstruction using cement-treated subgrade, and coordination with concurrent taxiway renaming and Master Plan updates to maintain consistency with FAA standards and future development. Construction phasing minimized impacts to airport operations through nighttime closures and a base bid with alternates to align with budget constraints.

Santa Barbara Municipal Airport (SBA), Santa Barbara, CA TAXIWAYS D, A1, B1, AND F (FORMERLY M, G, AND J)

PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS AND TERMINAL APRON

PAVEMENT REPAIR

ENGINEERING/CONSTRUCTION
Airport Owner: County of San Luis
Obispo
A/E Contract Value: $352,914
Construction Cost: $1.5M
Deputy Project Manager:

Cameron Morrow
Funding Source: FAA AIP Grant and
Local Funds
Project Details
The Terminal Apron and Site N Rehabilitation Project at SBP improved pavement conditions through pavement preservation of approximately 62,400 square yards of terminal apron and GA pavement. The project also included geometric improvements to the taxiway connectors leading into the Site N apron pavement, as well as modifications to the airfield lighting layout based on the geometric improvements.

Mead & Hunt completed design in March 2023, with construction from May to June 2023. Design efforts also included the design of a vehicle service road evaluation, expansion of asphalt pavement apron shoulder, and pavement repairs. Construction phasing was developed to minimize impacts to airport operations. The project was completed in three phases and the Terminal Apron pavement preservation was completed through a 72-hour nighttime closure.

San Luis Obispo County Airport (SBP), San Luis Obispo, CA

TERMINAL APRON AND SITE N REHABILITATION
Airport Owner: Mojave Air & Space
Port
A/E Contract Value: $287,000
Construction Cost: $1.9M (est)
Project Manager: Rafael Gonzalez
Funding Source: FAA AIP Grant
Funds
Project Details

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 34 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Mead & Hunt designed approximately 18,600 square yards of asphalt pavement reconstruction for MHV’s GA Apron. The project involves a full depth pavement removal and asphalt pavement reconstruction utilizing lime treated soil techniques to address the poor soil conditions. The project also includes the construction of new concrete valley gutters between the apron taxilanes to capture surface runoff. The project addresses flooding issues within the hangars and involves the installation of roof gutters to capture surface runoff from the hangar roofs, where surface runoff can be directed into proposed drop inlets.

The project was bid; however, construction was not awarded due to FAA funding limitation. The design facilitates the separation of bid schedules for GA pavement reconstruction, enabling alignment with the availability of FAA funding.

Mojave Air & Space Port (MHV) at Rutan Field, Mojave, CA

GENERAL AVIATION PAVEMENT RECONSTRUCTION

AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Airport Owner: Los Angeles County
A/E Contract Value: $1.4M
Construction Cost: $13M (est)
Project Manager: Eric Loera
Funding Source: FAA AIP Grant
Funds
Project Details
Mead & Hunt continues to serve as the prime consultant for the ongoing, anticipated 13-million-dollar project at POC. The project involves a mill-and-overlay rehabilitation of the Runway 8L-26R, Taxiway N, and Taxiway Connectors A, C, F, and G. The project also includes the reconfiguration of Taxiway E to address its non-standard configuration and comply with FAA standards. The project includes drainage improvements, mass grading, geotechnical engineering, and airfield electrical improvements. The design and construction phasing alternatives have been developed to account for funding limitations from the FAA.

The project has been structured to allow for the rehabilitation of the different airfield pavements based on FAA grant funding limitations and local cash flow. This approach enables POC to defer portions of the design for future projects if FAA resources do not allow for a complete rehabilitation of the runway and taxiway pavements.

Brackett Field Airport (POC), La Verne, CA
RUNWAY 8L-26R, TAXIWAY N, AND CONNECTOR

TAXIWAYS REHABILITATION
Airport Owner: California
Department of Transportation
A/E Contract Value: $199,907
Construction Cost: N/A
Project Manager: Lisa Harmon
Funding Source: State of California
Project Details

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 35 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Mead & Hunt led a multi-firm, multi-disciplinary project team to develop California’s statewide AAM implementation plan. The project included a detailed review of California’s multi-modal transportation system and statewide planning goals, and system needs and proposed AAM use cases. The project evaluated hypothetical AAM corridors and vertiport development sites, and then translated the lessons learned from the hypothetical exercise into actionable plans and policies. All project deliverables were presented to and reviewed by a large technical assistance committee that included federal and state officials, airport operators, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and targeted agency representatives.

The project was developed pursuant to California Senate Bill 800, which authorized Caltrans to:
Assess infrastructure readiness for a vertiport network to support AAM/UAM services
Prepare a three-year prioritized workplan outlining steps to make the infrastructure feasible and operational
Identify pathways to equity of access, ensuring underserved communities benefit from UAM development
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Sacramento, CA

ADVANCED AIR MOBILITY INFRASTRUCTURE READINESS AND

THREE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

ADVANCED AIR MOBILITY/URBAN AIR MOBILITY
Airport Owner: California
Department of Transportation
A/E Contract Value: $198,787
Construction Cost: N/A
Project Manager: Lisa Harmon
Funding Source: FAA Grant, State of
California
Project Details
CASP 2020 considers California's 241 public use airports not only as a statewide aviation system, but as part of the State's multi-modal transportation system. By doing so, the CASP considers the way in which aviation contributes to statewide mandates, addressing reductions in greenhouse gases, planning strategies to better align land use and transportation, and opportunities to provide redundant transportation systems in the face of ongoing sea level rise, wildfires, and other disruptions. Mead & Hunt conducted project-related research associated with key issues, such as infrastructure and safety needs, forecasts and aviation trends (including UAM and unmanned aerial systems technology and its implementation), mobility and access, land use and sustainability, and funding. Mead & Hunt worked in close cooperation with Caltrans staff and led public outreach efforts. While characterized for its innovative approach and scope, the CASP also satisfies the requirements for system plans set forth by FAA and the California Public Utilities Code.

The CASP successfully integrated aviation policy and recommendations into the broader scope of California land use and transportation planning. The CASP built on previously completed studies and produced recommendations for how the state could modify its aviation policy to further local, regional, and statewide goals.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans),
Division of Aeronautics, Sacramento, CA
CALIFORNIA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN (CASP), 2020
Airport Owner: Washington State
Department of Transportation
A/E Contract Value: $265,683
Construction Cost: N/A
Project Manager: Lisa Harmon
Funding Source: State of Washington
Project Details

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 36 The WSDOT study integrates AAM into the State’s multimodal transportation system.

The plan includes near-, medium-, and long-term recommendations for land use planning for AAM and UAM. The plan proposes state governance structures, policies, and regulatory mechanisms to adequately complement FAA oversight and funding mechanisms at the state level, and it provides recommendations for aircraft integration into statewide transportation plans in consultation with local jurisdictions, planning organizations, and other modal managers.

AAM includes the use of new and emerging technologies to present a new mode of transportation that has the potential to complement or supplement existing transportation modes and needs. While the various use cases associated with AAM provide the potential for a more sustainable mode of transportation that offers improved connectivity and accessibility, enhanced emergency response, and faster or more efficient travel, AAM also presents challenges as regulatory and policy frameworks seek to keep pace with technological development.

Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
Olympia, WA

ADVANCED AIR MOBILITY AIRCRAFT SYSTEM PLAN
4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Airport Owner: Napa County
A/E Contract Value: $419,994
Construction Cost: N/A
Project Manager:

Maranda Thompson
Funding Source: Local Funds
Project Details
Mead & Hunt is preparing a comprehensive update of the APC ALUCP to clarify and enhance ALUCP policies and facilitate implementation by local jurisdictions. Mead & Hunt is working with the ALUCP and representatives from three cities and one unincorporated community to update procedural policies and undertaking substantial public outreach.

In addition to updating airport data that serves as the basis of the ALUCP and associated noise, overflight, safety, and airspace protection policies, Mead & Hunt is also formulating policy and incorporating standards pertaining to electric and eVTOL aircraft to prepare the ALUCP and communities within the Airport Influence Areas for forthcoming AAM operations.

Napa County Airport (APC), Napa County, CA

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN UPDATE

FULLERTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Architectural/Engineering/Planning/Environmental Services 37 Emerging Technologies
eVTOL Charging Infrastructure Planning and Design – BETA Technologies Mead & Hunt is suppoting BETA Technologies in deploying electric aircraft charging infrastructure at airports nationwide.

Services include planning, environmental permitting, stakeholder coordination (airports, FBOs, utilities, local governments, and the FAA), and engineering design. Projects span both GA and commercial service airports and support BETA’s broader efforts to decarbonize air transportation and enable AAM.

Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) 03-71, Planning for Future Electric Vehicle Growth at Airports (06/23-08/25, On Budget)
Mead & Hunt was part of a national research team developing practical guidance to help airports plan for future electric vehicle (EV) growth, including electric ground support equipment and aircraft. In Phase I, Mead & Hunt led the development of a campus-wide siting framework and a strategic roadmap for deploying EV charging infrastructure.

Building on this foundation, Phase II focused on developing a step-by-step guide for undertaking an Electrification Master Plan (EMP), which can be implemented as a standalone effort or integrated into broader airport master planning to improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Together, the primer and EMP guide establish a comprehensive framework for strategic planning, technical analysis, stakeholder engagement, and policy alignment.

ACRP Report 261, Advanced Air Mobility Stakeholder Engagement (4/22-01/24, On Budget) Mead & Hunt developed a practical primer that advances emerging best practices for stakeholder engagement in AAM planning and decision-making. The primer features a suite of adaptable tools, checklists, and educational materials designed to support airport operators, AAM service providers, and local agencies in conducting effective outreach. The resource equips stakeholders to proactively engage communities and partners ahead of infrastructure planning, policy development, and implementation within the evolving AAM ecosystem.

Caltrans AAM Infrastructure Readiness Study and Workplan (6/23-12/24, On Budget) Contributed to the formulation of a three-year Implementation Roadmap that includes legislative modernization, permitting protocols, funding strategies, energy and infrastructure readiness, and environmental guidance. The plan, developed by Caltrans and California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) in response to SB 800, establishes a strategic framework to evaluate infrastructure readiness, regulatory alignment, and equity considerations to enable the safe, sustainable, and inclusive integration of AAM into California’s multimodal transportation system by 2028. 4 DETAILED WORK PLAN
Experience Exceptional
PREPARED BY MEAD & HUNT.

Standard Billing Rate Schedule

AVIATION - CALIFORNIA
Effective January 1, 2027
Standard Billing Rates
• Project Assistant I..........................................................................................................................$104.00 / hour • Project Assistant II......................................................................................................................... $111.00 / hour • Project Assistant III........................................................................................................................$139.00 / hour • Technical Editor III......................................................................................................................... $141.00 / hour • Technician I ................................................................................................................................. $129.00 / hour • Technician II.................................................................................................................................. $147.00 / hour • Technician III................................................................................................................................. $173.00 / hour • Technician IV ................................................................................................................................ $182.00 / hour • Senior Technician.......................................................................................................................... $226.00 / hour • Engineer I, Scientist I, Architect I, Interior Designer I, Planner I ..................................................... $162.00 / hour • Engineer II, Scientist II, Architect II, Interior Designer II, Planner II ................................................. $182.00 / hour • Engineer III, Scientist III, Architect III, Interior Designer III, Planner III ........................................... $195.00 / hour • Construction Resident Project Representative (RPR) .................................................................... $204.00 / hour • Senior Engineer, Senior Scientist, Senior Architect, Senior Interior Designer, Senior Planner, Construction Manager .................................................................................................................. $254.00 / hour • Project Engineer, Project Scientist, Project Architect, Project Interior Designer, Project Planner..... $274.00 / hour • Senior Project Engineer, Senior Project Scientist, Senior Project Architect, Senior Project Interior Designer Senior Project Planner................................................................................................................... $318.00 / hour • Senior Associate, Principal, Senior Client / Project Manager .......................................................... $380.00 / hour Expenses
• Out-Of-Pocket Direct Job Expenses .............................................................................................cost plus 15% Such as reproductions, sub-consultants / contractors, etc. • Company or Personal Car Mileage ...............................................................................................$ IRS rate / mile* * Rates will be charged at Current IRS rate https://www.irs.gov/tax-professionals/standard-mileage-rates • Air and Surface Transportation.....................................................................................................cost plus 15% • Lodging and Sustenance..............................................................................................................cost plus 15% Billing and Payment
• Travel time is charged for work required to be performed out-of-office. A minimum of two hours will be billed for any work out-of-office.
• Invoicing is on a monthly basis for work performed. Payment for services is due within 30 days from the date of the invoice. An interest charge of 1.5% per month is made on the unpaid balance starting 30 days after the date of invoice.

This schedule of billing rates is effective January 1, 2027, and will remain in effect until December 31, 2027, unless unforeseen increases in operational costs are encountered. We reserve the right to change rates to reflect such increases.

EXHIBIT C

CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A : NAIC #
NAME: CONTACT
(A/C, No): FAX
E-MAIL ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext): PHONE

INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A

SUBR WVDADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOS ONLY AUTOS NON-OWNED OWNED SCHEDULED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEE.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH- STATUTE PER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFFLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
10/8/2026
Holmes Murphy & Associates
2727 Grand Prairie Pkwy
Waukee IA 50263
Christina Hess 612-322-6071 [email protected] XL Specialty Insurance Company 37885 MEAHUNPC American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. 26247 Mead & Hunt, Inc.
2440 Deming Way
Middleton, WI 53562
Zurich American Insurance Company 16535 1818387477
C X 2,000,000 X 500,000 X Cont Liab Per 10,000 X Policy Form/XCU 2,000,000 4,000,000 X X GLO138723204 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
4,000,000
C 2,000,000 X
BAP138723104 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
B X X
AUC095226004 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
10,000,000 10,000,000 X
0 B X
N
WC138723304 7/1/2026 7/1/2027
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
A Professional Liability
(Claims-Made)
DPR5059327 7/1/2026 7/1/2027 Per Claim:

Per Aggregate:
$10,000,000
$10,000,000
All Work Performed
Additional Insured only if required by written contract with respect to General Liability, Automobile Liability and Umbrella/Excess Liability applies on a primary basis and the insurance of the additional insured shall be non-contributory: City of Fullerton, its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, and volunteers as required by written contract, per policy terms and conditions.

Waiver of Subrogation only if required by written contract with respect to General Liability, Automobile Liability, Workers Compensation and Umbrella/Excess Liability applies in favor of: City of Fullerton, its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, and volunteers as required by written contract, per policy See Attached...

City of Fullerton
303 West Commonwealth Avenue
Fullerton CA 92832

THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: FORM TITLE:

ADDITIONAL REMARKS
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page of
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID:

LOC #:

AGENCY

CARRIER NAIC CODE

POLICY NUMBER

NAMED INSURED
EFFECTIVE DATE:

MEAHUNPC 1 1
Holmes Murphy & Associates
Mead & Hunt, Inc.
2440 Deming Way
Middleton, WI 53562
25 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
terms and conditions.

Coverage: Crime - Client Coverage
Insurance Carrier: Continental Casualty Company
Policy: 8033037118
Eff Date: 07/01/2026 - 07/01/2027
Limits: $2,000,000
Coverage: Cyber Liability
Insurance Carrier: Homeland Insurance Company of New York Policy #: 720002946
Policy Term: 07/01/2026 - 07/01/2027
Limit: $5,000,000
Retention: $100,000
The General Liability, Automobile Liability, Umbrella/Excess Liability, and Workers' Compensation include an endorsement providing 30 days’ notice of cancellation will be furnished to the certificate holder.

Blanket Notification to Others of Cancellation
or Non-Renewal
U-CA-832-A CW (01/ 13)

Page 1 of 1 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Policy No. Eff. Date of Pol. Exp. Date of Pol. Eff. Date of End. Producer No. Add’l. Prem Return Prem.

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the:

Commercial Automobile Coverage Part
A. If we cancel or non-renew this Coverage Part by written notice to the first Named Insured, we will mail or deliver notification that such Coverage Part has been cancelled or non-renewed to each person or organization shown in a list provided to us by the first Named Insured if you are required by written contact or written agreement to provide such notification. However, such notification will not be mailed or delivered if a conditional notice of renewal has been sent to the first Named Insured. Such list:

1. Must be provided to us prior to cancellation or non-renewal;

2. Must contain the names and addresses of only the persons or organizations requiring notification that such Coverage Part has been cancelled or non-renewed; and

3. Must be in an electronic format that is acceptable to us.

B. Our notification as described in Paragraph A. of this endorsement will be based on the most recent list in our records as of the date the notice of cancellation or non-renewal is mailed or delivered to the first Named Insured. We will mail or deliver such notification to each person or organization shown in the list:

1. Within seven days of the effective date of the notice of cancellation, if we cancel for non-payment of premium; or

2. At least 30 days prior to the effective date of:
a. Cancellation, if cancelled for any reason other than nonpayment of premium; or b. Non-renewal, but not including conditional notice of renewal.

C. Our mailing or delivery of notification described in Paragraphs A. and B. of this endorsement is intended as a courtesy only. Our failure to provide such mailing or delivery will not:

1. Extend the Coverage Part cancellation or non-renewal date;

2. Negate the cancellation or non-renewal; or

3. Provide any additional insurance that would not have been provided in the absence of this endorsement.

D. We are not responsible for the accuracy, integrity, timeliness and validity of information contained in the list provided to us as described in Paragraphs A. and B. of this endorsement.

All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged.

THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

T
i
t
l
e
o
f
f
o
r
m
m
u
s
t
n
o
t
b
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
l
o
g
o
.
↑
T
o
p
M
a
r
g
i
n
3 /
4 "
U-GL-1521-B CW (01/19)

Page 1 of 2 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Blanket Notification to Others of Cancellation
or Non-Renewal
This endorsement applies to insurance provided under the:

Commercial General Liability Coverage Part
A. If we cancel or non-renew this Coverage Part by written notice to the first Named Insured, we will mail or deliver notification that such Coverage Part has been cancelled or non-renewed to each person or organization shown in a list provided to us by the first Named Insured if you are required by written contact or written agreement to provide such notification. Such list:

1. Must be provided to us prior to cancellation or non-renewal;

2. Must contain the names and addresses of only the persons or organizations requiring notification that such Coverage Part has been cancelled or non-renewed; and

3. Must be in an electronic format that is acceptable to us.

1. Within 10 days of the effective date of the notice of cancellation, if we cancel for non-payment of premium; or

2. At least 30 days prior to the effective date of:
a. Cancellation, if cancelled for any reason other than nonpayment of premium; or b. Non-renewal, but not including conditional notice of renewal, unless a greater number of days is shown in the Schedule of this endorsement for the mailing or delivering of such notification with respect to Paragraph B.1. or Paragraph B.2. above.

C. Our mailing or delivery of notification described in Paragraphs A. and B. of this endorsement is intended as a courtesy only. Our failure to provide such mailing or delivery will not:

1. Extend the Coverage Part cancellation or non-renewal date;

2. Negate the cancellation or non-renewal; or

3. Provide any additional insurance that would not have been provided in the absence of this endorsement.

Policy No. Effective Date:

U-GL-1521-B CW (01/19)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

D. We are not responsible for the accuracy, integrity, timeliness and validity of information contained in the list provided to us as described in Paragraphs A. and B. of this endorsement.

SCHEDULE
The total number of days for mailing or delivering with respect to Paragraph B.1. of this endorsement is amended to indicate the following number of days: * The total number of days for mailing or delivering with respect to Paragraph B.2. of this endorsement is amended to indicate the following number of days: ** * If a number is not shown here, 10 days continues to apply. ** If a number is not shown here, 30 days continues to apply.

All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged.

WC 99 06 43 Page 1 of 1
(Ed. 01-13) Includes copyright material of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. used with its permission. © 2012 Copyright National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 99 06 43

BLANKET NOTIFICATION TO OTHERS OF CANCELLATION OR NONRENEWAL ENDORSEMENT This endorsement adds the following to Part Six of the policy.

PART SIX

CONDITIONS
Blanket Notification to Others of Cancellation or Nonrenewal

1. If we cancel or non-renew this policy by written notice to you, we will mail or deliver notification that such policy has been cancelled or non-renewed to each person or organization shown in a list provided to us by you if you are required by written contract or written agreement to provide such notification. However, such notification will not be mailed or delivered if a conditional notice of renewal has been sent to you. Such list:
a. Must be provided to us prior to cancellation or non-renewal; b. Must contain the names and addresses of only the persons or organizations requiring notification that such policy has been cancelled or non-renewed; and
c. Must be in an electronic format that is acceptable to us.

2. Our notification as described in Paragraph 1. above will be based on the most recent list in our records as of the date the notice of cancellation or non-renewal is mailed or delivered to you. We will mail or deliver such notification to each person or organization shown in the list:
a. Within seven days of the effective date of the notice of cancellation, if we cancel for non-payment of premium; or
b. At least 30 days prior to the effective date of:
(1) Cancellation, if cancelled for any reason other than nonpayment of premium; or (2) Non-renewal, but not including conditional notice of renewal.

3. Our mailing or delivery of notification described in Paragraphs 1. and 2. above is intended as a courtesy only.

Our failure to provide such mailing or delivery will not:
a. Extend the policy cancellation or non-renewal date;
b. Negate the cancellation or non-renewal; or
c. Provide any additional insurance that would not have been provided in the absence of this endorsement.

4. We are not responsible for the accuracy, integrity, timeliness and validity of information contained in the list provided to us as described in Paragraphs 1. and 2. above.

All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged.

This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. (The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective Policy No. Endorsement No.

Insured Premium $
Insurance Company
Mead & Hunt, Inc.

Endorsement # 10
Policy No. Eff. Date of Pol. Exp. Date of Pol. Eff. Date of End. Producer Add'l Prem. Return Prem.

Named Insured and Mailing Address: Producer:
09132000
MEAD AND HUNT, INC.
2440 DEMING WAY
MIDDLETON, WI 53562
---------- ----------
Blanket Notification to Others of Cancellation or
Nonrenewal
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

The following is added to Paragraph A. of SECTION VI. CONDITIONS:

Blanket Notification to Others of Cancellation or Nonrenewal a. If we cancel or non-renew this policy by written notice to the first Named Insured, we will mail or deliver notification that such policy has been cancelled or non-renewed to each person or organization shown in a list provided to us by the first Named Insured if you are required by written contract or written agreement to provide such notification.

However, such notification will not be mailed or delivered if a conditional notice of renewal has been sent to the first Named Insured. Such list:
(1) Must be provided to us prior to cancellation or non-renewal; (2) Must contain the names and addresses of only the persons or organizations requiring notification that such policy has been cancelled or non-renewed; and
(3) Must be in an electronic format that is acceptable to us. b. Our notification as described in Paragraph a. above will be based on the most recent list in our records as of the date the notice of cancellation or non-renewal is mailed or delivered to the first Named Insured. We will mail or deliver such notification to each person or organization shown in the list:
(1) Within seven days of the effective date of the notice of cancellation, if we cancel for non-payment of premium; or (2) At least 30 days prior to the effective date of:
(a) Cancellation, if cancelled for any reason other than nonpayment of premium; or (b) Non-renewal, but not including conditional notice of renewal. c. Our mailing or delivery of notification described in Paragraphs a. and b. above is intended as a courtesy only. Our failure to provide such mailing or delivery will not:
(1) Extend the policy cancellation or non-renewal date; (2) Negate the cancellation or non-renewal; or
(3) Provide any additional insurance that would not have been provided in the absence of this endorsement. d. We are not responsible for the accuracy, integrity, timeliness and validity of information contained in the list provided to us as described in Paragraphs a. and b. above.

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE POLICY SHALL APPLY AND REMAIN UNCHANGED.

U-UMB-722-A CW (01/13)
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. Page 1 of 1 Additional Insured – Automatic – Owners, Lessees Or
Contractors
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

Policy No. Effective Date:

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the:

Commercial General Liability Coverage Part
A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured any person or organization whom you are required to add as an additional insured under a written contract or written agreement executed by you, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" and subject to the following:

1. If such written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide that the person or organization be named as an additional insured under one or both of the following endorsements:
a. The Insurance Services Office (ISO) ISO CG 20 10 (10/01 edition); or b. The ISO CG 20 37 (10/01 edition),
such person or organization is then an additional insured with respect to such endorsement(s), but only to the extent that "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arises out of:
(1) Your ongoing operations, with respect to Paragraph 1.a. above; or (2) "Your work", with respect to Paragraph 1.b. above,
which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this Paragraph 1., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
(a) Only applies if the "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" offense occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement; and
(b) Does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused by "your work" and included within the "products-completed operations hazard" unless the written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide such coverage to such additional insured.

2. If such written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide that the person or organization be named as an additional insured under one or both of the following endorsements:
a. The Insurance Services Office (ISO) ISO CG 20 10 (07/04 edition); or b. The ISO CG 20 37 (07/04 edition),
such person or organization is then an additional insured with respect to such endorsement(s), but only to the extent that "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" is caused, in whole or in part, by:
(1) Your acts or omissions; or
(2) The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf, U-GL-2162-A CW (02/19)

Page 1 of 4 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. in the performance of:
(a) Your ongoing operations, with respect to Paragraph 2.a. above; or (b) "Your work" and included in the "products-completed operations hazard", with respect to Paragraph

2.b. above,
which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this Paragraph 2., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
(i) Only applies if the "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" offense occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement; and
(ii) Does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused by "your work" and included within the "products-completed operations hazard" unless the written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide such coverage to such additional insured.

3. If neither Paragraph 1. nor Paragraph 2. above apply and such written contract or written agreement requires that you provide that the person or organization be named as an additional insured:
a. Under the ISO CG 20 10 (04/13 edition, any subsequent edition or if no edition date is specified); or b. With respect to ongoing operations (if no form is specified), such person or organization is then an additional insured only to the extent that "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" is caused, in whole or in part by:
(1) Your acts or omissions; or
(2) The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf, in the performance of your ongoing operations, which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this Paragraph 3., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
(a) Only applies to the extent permitted by law;
(b) Will not be broader than that which you are required by the written contract or written agreement to provide for such additional insured; and
(c) Only applies if the "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" offense occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement.

4. If neither Paragraph 1. nor Paragraph 2. above apply and such written contract or written agreement requires that you provide that the person or organization be named as an additional insured:
a. Under the ISO CG 20 37 (04/13 edition, any subsequent edition or if no edition date is specified); or b. With respect to the "products-completed operations hazard" (if no form is specified), such person or organization is then an additional insured only to the extent that "bodily injury" or "property damage" is caused, in whole or in part by "your work" and included in the "products-completed operations hazard", which is the subject of the written contract or written agreement.

However, solely with respect to this Paragraph 4., insurance afforded to such additional insured:
(1) Only applies to the extent permitted by law;
(2) Will not be broader than that which you are required by the written contract or written agreement to provide for such additional insured;
(3) Only applies if the "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurs during the policy period and subsequent to your execution of the written contract or written agreement; and (4) Does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused by "your work" and included within the "products-completed operations hazard" unless the written contract or written agreement specifically requires that you provide such coverage to such additional insured.

U-GL-2162-A CW (02/19)

Page 2 of 4 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

B. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to any additional insured referenced in Section A. of this endorsement, the following additional exclusion applies:

This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" arising out of the rendering of, or failure to render, any professional architectural, engineering or surveying services including:

1. The preparing, approving or failing to prepare or approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications; or

2. Supervisory, inspection, architectural or engineering activities.

This exclusion applies even if the claims against any insured allege negligence or other wrongdoing in the supervision, hiring, employment, training or monitoring of others by that insured, if the "occurrence" which caused the "bodily injury" or "property damage", or the offense which caused the "personal and advertising injury", involved the rendering of or the failure to render any professional architectural, engineering or surveying services.

C. Solely with respect to the coverage provided by this endorsement, the following is added to Paragraph 2. Duties In The Event Of Occurrence, Offense, Claim Or Suit of Section IV – Commercial General Liability Conditions:

The additional insured must see to it that:
(1) We are notified as soon as practicable of an "occurrence" or offense that may result in a claim; (2) We receive written notice of a claim or "suit" as soon as practicable; and (3) A request for defense and indemnity of the claim or "suit" will promptly be brought against any policy issued by another insurer under which the additional insured may be an insured in any capacity. This provision does not apply to insurance on which the additional insured is a Named Insured if the written contract or written agreement requires that this coverage be primary and non-contributory.

D. Solely with respect to the coverage provided by this endorsement:

1. The following is added to the Other Insurance Condition of Section IV – Commercial General Liability Conditions:

Primary and Noncontributory insurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured provided that:
a. The additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance; and b. You are required by written contract or written agreement that this insurance be primary and not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured.

2. The following paragraph is added to Paragraph 4.b. of the Other Insurance Condition under Section IV – Commercial General Liability Conditions:

This insurance is excess over:

Any of the other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, available to an additional insured, in which the additional insured on our policy is also covered as an additional insured on another policy providing coverage for the same "occurrence", offense, claim or "suit". This provision does not apply to any policy in which the additional insured is a Named Insured on such other policy and where our policy is required by a written contract or written agreement to provide coverage to the additional insured on a primary and noncontributory basis.

E. This endorsement does not apply to an additional insured which has been added to this Coverage Part by an endorsement showing the additional insured in a Schedule of additional insureds, and which endorsement applies specifically to that identified additional insured.

F. Solely with respect to the insurance afforded to an additional insured under Paragraph A.3. or Paragraph A.4. of this endorsement, the following is added to Section III – Limits Of Insurance:

Additional Insured – Automatic – Owners, Lessees Or Contractors Limit The most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance:

U-GL-2162-A CW (02/19)

Page 3 of 4 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

1. Required by the written contract or written agreement referenced in Section A. of this endorsement; or

2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations, whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.

All other terms, conditions, provisions and exclusions of this policy remain the same.

U-GL-2162-A CW (02/19)

Page 4 of 4 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

U-CA-424-H CW (10/21)

Page 1 of 6 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

Coverage Extension Endorsement
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

Policy No. Effective Date:

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the:

Business Auto Coverage Form
Motor Carrier Coverage Form
A. Amended Who Is An Insured

1. The following is added to the Who Is An Insured Provision in Section II – Covered Autos Liability Coverage:

The following are also "insureds":
a. Any "employee" of yours is an "insured" while using a covered "auto" you don't own, hire or borrow for acts performed within the scope of employment by you. Any “employee” of yours is also an “insured” while operating an “auto” hired or rented under a contract or agreement in an “employee’s” name, with your permission, while performing duties related to the conduct of your business. b. Anyone volunteering services to you is an "insured" while using a covered "auto" you don’t own, hire or borrow to transport your clients or other persons in activities necessary to your business. c. Anyone else who furnishes an "auto" referenced in Paragraphs A.1.a. and A.1.b. in this endorsement. d. Where and to the extent permitted by law, any person(s) or organization(s) where required by written contract or written agreement with you executed prior to any "accident", including those person(s) or organization(s) directing your work pursuant to such written contract or written agreement with you, provided the "accident" arises out of operations governed by such contract or agreement and only up to the limits required in the written contract or written agreement, or the Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations, whichever is less.

2. The following is added to the Other Insurance Condition in the Business Auto Coverage Form and the Other Insurance – Primary and Excess Insurance Provisions Condition in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form:

Coverage for any person(s) or organization(s), where required by written contract or written agreement with you executed prior to any "accident", will apply on a primary and non-contributory basis and any insurance maintained by the additional "insured" will apply on an excess basis. However, in no event will this coverage extend beyond the terms and conditions of the Coverage Form.

B. Amendment – Supplementary Payments
Paragraphs a.(2) and a.(4) of the Coverage Extensions Provision in Section II – Covered Autos Liability Coverage are replaced by the following:
(2) Up to $5,000 for the cost of bail bonds (including bonds for related traffic law violations) required because of an "accident" we cover. We do not have to furnish these bonds. (4) All reasonable expenses incurred by the "insured" at our request, including actual loss of earnings up to $500 a day because of time off from work.

C. Fellow Employee Coverage
The Fellow Employee Exclusion contained in Section II – Covered Autos Liability Coverage does not apply.

U-CA-424-H CW (10/21)

Page 2 of 6 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

D. Driver Safety Program Liability and Physical Damage Coverage

1. The following is added to the Racing Exclusion in Section II – Covered Autos Liability Coverage:

This exclusion does not apply to covered "autos" participating in a driver safety program event, such as, but not limited to, auto or truck rodeos and other auto or truck agility demonstrations.

2. The following is added to Paragraph 2. in B. Exclusions of Section III – Physical Damage Coverage of the Business Auto Coverage Form and Paragraph 2.b. in B. Exclusions of Section IV – Physical Damage Coverage of the Motor Carrier Coverage Form:

This exclusion does not apply to covered "autos" participating in a driver safety program event, such as, but not limited to, auto or truck rodeos and other auto or truck agility demonstrations.

E. Lease or Loan Gap Coverage
The following is added to the Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

Lease Or Loan Gap Coverage
In the event of a total "loss" to a covered "auto", we will pay any unpaid amount due on the lease or loan for a covered "auto", less:
a. Any amount paid under the Physical Damage Coverage Section of the Coverage Form; and b. Any:
(1) Overdue lease or loan payments at the time of the "loss"; (2) Financial penalties imposed under a lease for excessive use, abnormal wear and tear or high mileage; (3) Security deposits not returned by the lessor;
(4) Costs for extended warranties, credit life insurance, health, accident or disability insurance purchased with the loan or lease; and
(5) Carry-over balances from previous leases or loans.

F. Towing and Labor
Paragraph A.2. of the Physical Damage Coverage Section is replaced by the following:

We will pay up to $75 for towing and labor costs incurred each time a covered "auto" that is a "private passenger type", light truck or medium truck is disabled. However, the labor must be performed at the place of disablement.

As used in this provision, "private passenger type" means a private passenger or station wagon type "auto" and includes an "auto" of the pickup or van type if not used for business purposes.

G. Extended Glass Coverage
The following is added to Paragraph A.3.a. of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

If glass must be replaced, the deductible shown in the Declarations will apply. However, if glass can be repaired and is actually repaired rather than replaced, the deductible will be waived. You have the option of having the glass repaired rather than replaced.

H. Hired Auto Physical Damage – Increased Loss of Use Expenses The Coverage Extension for Loss Of Use Expenses in the Physical Damage Coverage Section is replaced by the following:

Loss Of Use Expenses
For Hired Auto Physical Damage, we will pay expenses for which an "insured" becomes legally responsible to pay for loss of use of a vehicle rented or hired without a driver under a written rental contract or written rental agreement. We will pay for loss of use expenses if caused by:
(1) Other than collision only if the Declarations indicate that Comprehensive Coverage is provided for any covered "auto";
U-CA-424-H CW (10/21)

Page 3 of 6 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission. (2) Specified Causes Of Loss only if the Declarations indicate that Specified Causes Of Loss Coverage is provided for any covered "auto"; or
(3) Collision only if the Declarations indicate that Collision Coverage is provided for any covered "auto".

However, the most we will pay for any expenses for loss of use is $100 per day, to a maximum of $3000.

I. Personal Effects Coverage
The following is added to the Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

Personal Effects Coverage
a. We will pay up to $750 for "loss" to personal effects which are:
(1) Personal property owned by an "insured"; and
(2) In or on a covered "auto".
b. Subject to Paragraph a. above, the amount to be paid for "loss" to personal effects will be based on the lesser of:
(1) The reasonable cost to replace; or
(2) The actual cash value.
c. The coverage provided in Paragraphs a. and b. above, only applies in the event of a total theft of a covered "auto".

No deductible applies to this coverage. However, we will not pay for "loss" to personal effects of any of the following:
(1) Accounts, bills, currency, deeds, evidence of debt, money, notes, securities, or commercial paper or other documents of value.
(2) Bullion, gold, silver, platinum, or other precious alloys or metals; furs or fur garments; jewelry, watches, precious or semi-precious stones.
(3) Paintings, statuary and other works of art.
(4) Contraband or property in the course of illegal transportation or trade. (5) Tapes, records, discs or other similar devices used with audio, visual or data electronic equipment.

Any coverage provided by this Provision is excess over any other insurance coverage available for the same "loss".

J. Tapes, Records and Discs Coverage

1. The Exclusion in Paragraph B.4.a. of Section III – Physical Damage Coverage in the Business Auto Coverage Form and the Exclusion in Paragraph B.2.c. of Section IV – Physical Damage Coverage in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form does not apply.

2. The following is added to Paragraph 1.a. Comprehensive Coverage under the Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

We will pay for "loss" to tapes, records, discs or other similar devices used with audio, visual or data electronic equipment. We will pay only if the tapes, records, discs or other similar audio, visual or data electronic devices:
(a) Are the property of an "insured"; and
(b) Are in a covered "auto" at the time of "loss".

The most we will pay for such "loss" to tapes, records, discs or other similar devices is $500. The Physical Damage Coverage Deductible Provision does not apply to such "loss".

K. Airbag Coverage
The Exclusion in Paragraph B.3.a. of Section III – Physical Damage Coverage in the Business Auto Coverage Form and the Exclusion in Paragraph B.4.a. of Section IV – Physical Damage Coverage in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form does not apply to the accidental discharge of an airbag.

L. Two or More Deductibles
The following is added to the Deductible Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

U-CA-424-H CW (10/21)

Page 4 of 6 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

If an accident is covered both by this policy or Coverage Form and by another policy or Coverage Form issued to you by us, the following applies for each covered "auto" on a per vehicle basis:

1. If the deductible on this policy or Coverage Form is the smaller (or smallest) deductible, it will be waived; or

2. If the deductible on this policy or Coverage Form is not the smaller (or smallest) deductible, it will be reduced by the amount of the smaller (or smallest) deductible.

M. Temporary Substitute Autos – Physical Damage

1. The following is added to Section I – Covered Autos:

Temporary Substitute Autos – Physical Damage
If Physical Damage Coverage is provided by this Coverage Form on your owned covered "autos", the following types of vehicles are also covered "autos" for Physical Damage Coverage:

Any "auto" you do not own when used with the permission of its owner as a temporary substitute for a covered "auto" you do own but is out of service because of its:

1. Breakdown;

2. Repair;

3. Servicing;

4. "Loss"; or

5. Destruction.

2. The following is added to the Paragraph A. Coverage Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

Temporary Substitute Autos – Physical Damage
We will pay the owner for "loss" to the temporary substitute "auto" unless the "loss" results from fraudulent acts or omissions on your part. If we make any payment to the owner, we will obtain the owner's rights against any other party.

The deductible for the temporary substitute "auto" will be the same as the deductible for the covered "auto" it replaces.

N. Amended Duties In The Event Of Accident, Claim, Suit Or Loss Paragraph a. of the Duties In The Event Of Accident, Claim, Suit Or Loss Condition is replaced by the following:
a. In the event of "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss", you must give us or our authorized representative prompt notice of the "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss". However, these duties only apply when the "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss" is known to you (if you are an individual), a partner (if you are a partnership), a member (if you are a limited liability company) or an executive officer or insurance manager (if you are a corporation). The failure of any agent, servant or employee of the "insured" to notify us of any "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss" shall not invalidate the insurance afforded by this policy.

Include, as soon as practicable:
(1) How, when and where the "accident" or "loss" occurred and if a claim is made or "suit" is brought, written notice of the claim or "suit" including, but not limited to, the date and details of such claim or "suit"; (2) The "insured’s" name and address; and
(3) To the extent possible, the names and addresses of any injured persons and witnesses.

If you report an "accident", claim, "suit" or "loss" to another insurer when you should have reported to us, your failure to report to us will not be seen as a violation of these amended duties provided you give us notice as soon as practicable after the fact of the delay becomes known to you.

O. Waiver of Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us The following is added to the Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us Condition:

U-CA-424-H CW (10/21)

Page 5 of 6 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

This Condition does not apply to the extent required of you by a written contract, executed prior to any "accident" or "loss", provided that the "accident" or "loss" arises out of operations contemplated by such contract. This waiver only applies to the person or organization designated in the contract.

P. Employee Hired Autos – Physical Damage
Paragraph b. of the Other Insurance Condition in the Business Auto Coverage Form and Paragraph f. of the Other Insurance – Primary and Excess Insurance Provisions Condition in the Motor Carrier Coverage Form are replaced by the following:

For Hired Auto Physical Damage Coverage, the following are deemed to be covered "autos" you own:
(1) Any covered "auto" you lease, hire, rent or borrow; and (2) Any covered "auto" hired or rented under a written contract or written agreement entered into by an "employee" or elected or appointed official with your permission while being operated within the course and scope of that "employee's" employment by you or that elected or appointed official’s duties as respect their obligations to you.

However, any "auto" that is leased, hired, rented or borrowed with a driver is not a covered "auto".

Q. Unintentional Failure to Disclose Hazards
The following is added to the Concealment, Misrepresentation Or Fraud Condition:

However, we will not deny coverage under this Coverage Form if you unintentionally:
(1) Fail to disclose any hazards existing at the inception date of this Coverage Form; or (2) Make an error, omission, improper description of "autos" or other misstatement of information.

You must notify us as soon as possible after the discovery of any hazards or any other information that was not provided to us prior to the acceptance of this policy.

R. Hired Auto – World Wide Coverage
Paragraph 7.b.(5) of the Policy Period, Coverage Territory Condition is replaced by the following:
(5) Anywhere else in the world if a covered "auto" is leased, hired, rented or borrowed for a period of 60 days or less, S. Bodily Injury Redefined
The definition of "bodily injury" in the Definitions Section is replaced by the following:
"Bodily injury" means bodily injury, sickness or disease, sustained by a person including death or mental anguish, resulting from any of these at any time. Mental anguish means any type of mental or emotional illness or disease.

T. Expected Or Intended Injury
The Expected Or Intended Injury Exclusion in Paragraph B. Exclusions under Section II – Covered Auto Liability Coverage is replaced by the following:

Expected Or Intended Injury
"Bodily injury" or "property damage" expected or intended from the standpoint of the "insured". This exclusion does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" resulting from the use of reasonable force to protect persons or property.

U. Physical Damage – Additional Temporary Transportation Expense Coverage Paragraph A.4.a. of Section III – Physical Damage Coverage is replaced by the following:

4. Coverage Extensions
a. Transportation Expenses
We will pay up to $50 per day to a maximum of $1,000 for temporary transportation expense incurred by you because of the total theft of a covered "auto" of the private passenger type. We will pay only for those covered "autos" for which you carry either Comprehensive or Specified Causes of Loss Coverage. We will pay for temporary transportation expenses incurred during the period beginning 48 hours after the theft and ending, regardless of the policy's expiration, when the covered "auto" is returned to use or we pay for its "loss".

U-CA-424-H CW (10/21)

Page 6 of 6 ends

Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

V. Replacement of a Private Passenger Auto with a Hybrid or Alternative Fuel Source Auto The following is added to Paragraph A. Coverage of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

In the event of a total "loss" to a covered "auto" of the private passenger type that is replaced with a hybrid "auto" or "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source of the private passenger type, we will pay an additional 10% of the cost of the replacement "auto", excluding tax, title, license, other fees and any aftermarket vehicle upgrades, up to a maximum of $2500. The covered "auto" must be replaced by a hybrid "auto" or an "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source within 60 calendar days of the payment of the "loss" and evidenced by a bill of sale or new vehicle lease agreement.

To qualify as a hybrid "auto", the "auto" must be powered by a conventional gasoline engine and another source of propulsion power. The other source of propulsion power must be electric, hydrogen, propane, solar or natural gas, either compressed or liquefied. To qualify as an "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source, the "auto" must be powered by a source of propulsion power other than a conventional gasoline engine. An "auto" solely propelled by biofuel, gasoline or diesel fuel or any blend thereof is not an "auto" powered by an alternative fuel source.

W. Return of Stolen Automobile
The following is added to the Coverage Extension Provision of the Physical Damage Coverage Section:

If a covered “auto” is stolen and recovered, we will pay the cost of transport to return the “auto” to you. We will pay only for those covered “autos" for which you carry either Comprehensive or Specified Causes of Loss Coverage.

All other terms, conditions, provisions and exclusions of this policy remain the same.

Waiver Of Subrogation (Blanket) Endorsement
U-GL-925-B CW (12/01)

Page 1 of 1 ends

Policy No. Eff. Date of Pol. Exp. Date of Pol. Eff. Date of End. Producer Add’l. Prem Return Prem. $ $
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the:

Commercial General Liability Coverage Part
The following is added to the Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us Condition:

If you are required by a written contract or agreement, which is executed before a loss, to waive your rights of recovery from others, we agree to waive our rights of recovery. This waiver of rights shall not be construed to be a waiver with respect to any other operations in which the insured has no contractual interest.

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 00 03 13 (Ed. 04-84)

WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT
We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the Schedule.

Schedule
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. (The information below is required only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to preparation of the policy.) Endorsement Effective Policy No Endorsement No.

Insured Premium $
Insurance Company Countersigned by
WC124 (4-84) Page 1 of 1
WC 00 03 13 Copyright 1983 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Uniform FormsTM

ALL PERSONS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT

WITH THE INSURED, EXECUTED PRIOR TO THE ACCIDENT OR LOSS, THAT WAIVER OF SUBROGATION BE PROVIDED UNDER THIS POLICY FOR WORK PERFORMED BY YOU AND FOR THAT PERSON AND/OR ORGANIZATION

2. Electronic data means information, facts or programs stored as or on, created or used on, or transmitted to or from computer software, including systems and applications software, hard or floppy disks, CD-ROMS, tapes, drives, cells, data processing devices or any other media which are used with electronically controlled equipment.

3. Loss means those sums actually paid that the insured is legally obligated to pay as damages for the settlement or satisfaction of a claim because of injury or offense, after making proper deductions for all recoveries and salvage. However:
a. Under Coverage A:
(1) Loss also includes defense expenses and supplementary payments if underlying insurance includes defense expenses and supplementary payments in the Limits of Insurance; and (2) Loss does not include defense expenses and supplementary payments if underlying insurance does not include defense expenses and supplementary payments in the Limits of Insurance. b. Under Coverage B., loss does not include defense expenses and supplementary payments.

4. Other insurance means a policy of insurance providing coverage that this policy also provides. Other insurance includes any type of self-insurance or other mechanisms by which an insured arranges for funding of legal liabilities.

Other insurance does not include underlying insurance or a policy of insurance specifically purchased to be excess of this policy providing coverage that this policy also provides.

5. Pollutants mean any man-made or naturally occurring solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, including but not limited to: smoke; vapor; soot; fumes; acids; alkalis; chemicals and waste. Waste includes materials to be recycled, reconditioned or reclaimed.

6. Suit means a civil proceeding in which injuries or damages to which this insurance applies are alleged. Suit includes:
a. An arbitration proceeding in which such damages are claimed and to which the insured must submit pursuant to law or contract or does submit with our consent; or b. Any other alternative dispute resolution proceeding in which such damages are claimed and to which the insured submits with our consent.

7. Underlying insurance means the policy or policies of insurance listed in the Schedule of Underlying Insurance forming a part of this policy. We will only be liable for amounts in excess of the Limits of Insurance shown in the Schedule of Underlying Insurance for any underlying insurance. B. The following definitions are applicable to Coverage A only:

1. Hostile fire means one which becomes uncontrollable or breaks out from where it was intended to be.

2. Insured means:
a. You;
b. Any person or organization included as an insured in underlying insurance; and c. Any person or organization qualifying as an additional insured in underlying insurance but only to the same extent that such person or organization is an additional insured under such underlying insurance. 3. Non-Admitted Jurisdiction means:
a. Any country or political subdivision in which we are not licensed or permitted to insure risks and where doing so would violate the insurance laws and regulations of such jurisdiction; or b. Any country or political subdivision where we are prevented by law from investigating, defending or settling an occurrence or suit. 4. Occurrence means a covered event as defined in underlying insurance. 5. Qualified Entity means any entity, person or organization that is not an insured under this policy and would qualify as an insured under this policy, but for the fact that the entity is registered, domiciled or has ongoing operations in a non-admitted jurisdiction.

U-UMB-103-C CW (03/10)

Page 10 of 19 ends

Nothing herein will be construed to make this policy subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of such other insurance. 14. Premium
The premium for this policy as stated in Item 6. of the Declarations is a flat premium. It is not subject to adjustment unless an endorsement is attached to this policy.

15. Separation of Insureds
Except with respect to the Limits of Insurance, and any rights or duties specifically assigned to the first Named Insured, this insurance applies:
a. As if each named insured were the only named insured; and b. Separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought.

16. Terms Conformed to Statute
The terms of this policy which are in conflict with the statutes, laws, ordinances or regulations in any country, jurisdiction, state or province where this policy is issued are amended to conform to such statutes, laws, ordinances or regulations. If we are prevented by law or statute from paying on behalf of the insured, then we will, where permitted by law or statute, indemnify the insured. 17. Transfer of Rights of Recovery Against Others to Us a. If the insured has rights to recover all or part of any payment we have made under this insurance, those rights are transferred to us. The insured must do nothing after the loss to impair them. At our request, the insured will bring suit or transfer those rights to us and help us enforce them.

However, if any insured is required by a written contract or agreement which is executed before a loss to waive their rights of recovery from others, we agree to waive our rights of recovery. This waiver of rights shall not be construed to be a waiver with respect to any other operations for which the insured has not waived their rights of recovery by contract.
b. Any amount recovered will be apportioned in the inverse order of payment of loss to the extent of actual payment. The expenses of all such recovery proceedings will be apportioned in the ratio of respective recoveries.

18. Transfer of Your Rights and Duties
Your rights and duties under this insurance may not be transferred without our written consent. If you die, then your rights and duties will be transferred to your legal representative, but only while acting within the scope of duties as your legal representative. Until your legal representative is appointed, anyone having temporary custody of your property will have your rights and duties but only with respect to that property.

19. When Loss is Payable
Coverage under this policy will not apply until the insured, or the insured’s underlying insurer has paid or is legally obligated to pay the full amount of the Underlying Limits of Insurance or Retained Limit. When the amount of loss is determined by an agreed settlement or on a final judgment against an insured obtained after an actual trial, we will promptly pay on behalf of the insured the amount of loss covered under the terms of this policy. The first Named Insured will promptly reimburse us for any amount within the Retained Limit paid by us.

20. Violation of Economic or Trade Sanctions
If coverage for a claim or suit under this policy is in violation of any economic or trade sanctions of the United States of America then coverage for that claim or suit will be null and void.

B. The following Condition is applicable to Coverage A and Coverage B:

1. Notice of Occurrence, Claim or Suit
a. You must see to it that we are notified as soon as practicable of an occurrence which may result in damages covered by this policy.

To the extent possible, notice will include:
(1) How, when and where the occurrence took place;
U-UMB-103-C CW (03/10)

Page 18 of 19 ends

City Council - Successor Agency - Housing AuthorityOctober 20, 2026

City Council - Successor Agency - Housing Authority
October 20, 2026