PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 1.2/16/21 PAGE 1
1.84782V
184784
184786
184788
1.84790
184792
1.84794
1.84796
184798
D389620
D389622
D389624
D389626
D389628
D389630
D389632
D389634
D389636
D389638
D389640
D389642
D389644
D389646
D38964B
D389650
D389652
D389654
D389656
D389658
D389660
D389662
D389664
D389666
D389668
D389670
D389672
D389674
D389676
D389678
D389680
D389682
D389684
D389686
D3B9688
D3B9690
D389692
D389694
D389696
THE HARTFORD
HOAI TRUONG H NGUYEN
KENNETH H LE
DIANE BELAIR
SUSAN VITALI
ARTHUR J FLORES
DEANNA M CHUMACERO
BRANDON J TAING
PATRICK R JULIENNE
GEORGES BRIETIGAM III
STEVEN R JONES
DIEDRE THU HA NGUYEN
JOHN R ONEILL
SHAWN SPARK
MARIA A STIPE
AMANDA M POLLOCK
LIZABETH C VASQUEZ
JEFFREY P DAVIS
RACHEL MENDIOLA
ANA E PULIDO
SHAUNA J CARRENO
DANNY HUYNH
IVY LE
LINDA MIDDENDORF
PHUONG VIENT NGUYEN
TINA T NGUYEN
MARIA RAMOS
CUONG K TRAN
THANH-NGUYEN VO
YUAN SONG
MARIA ALINA CURTSEIT
CHRISTI C MENDOZA
ANN C EIFERT
MARISA ATIN RAMOS
KEISUKE FUKAZAWA
HEIDY Y MUNOZ
MY TRA VO
KAREN J BROWN
EDWARD E MARVIN JR
JENNIFER L PETERSON
EVA RAMIREZ
GARY F HERNANDEZ
DANIEL J SANCHEZ
ALANA R CHENG
LISA L KIM
MICHAEL G AUSTIN
BRYSON T DAHLHEIMER
DAVID A DENT
**** PAGE TOTAL 217285.57
(VOID) -13.00
1201.69
602.42
2091.62
1.35.66 2470.90
1028·. 3 9
1.87.47 13244. 72
262.05
243.1.9
276.47
295.82
2560.1.7
5567.71
1.860.83
2286.45
1645.32
1.1.65.92 41.00.76
2096.78
3860.22
2155.88
2765.67
2159.48
2026.62
2434.39
201.7.42
1.671..01
4952.1.3
1690.65
1048.28
3606.81
1401.63
768 .. 83
3793.54
5544.22
660.05
2038.42
1980. 78
2049.77
2286.39
1700.63
5779.30
5225.88
2600.35
2290.91
4938.03
1.84783
184785
184787
1.84789
1.84791.
1.84793
184795
1.84797
• 184799
D389621
D3B9623
D389625
D389627
D389629
D389631
D3B9633
D389635
D389637
D389639
D389641
D389643
D389645
D389647
D389649
D389651
D389653
D389655
D389657
·D389659
D389661
D389663
D389665
D389667
D389669
D389671
D389673
D389675
D389677
D389679
D389681.
D389683
D389685
D389687
D389689
D389691.
D389693
D389695
D389697
DEREK M LINK
TINA HUONG NGO
JUDI'IB A MOORE
MICHAEL F ROCHA
DAMIAN JESUS CHAVEZ
JESSICA CEDILLO PADILLA
LAURA M PACHECO
SAMANTHA B VARGAS
STEPHEN J VARGAS
PHAT T BUI
STEPHANIE L KLOPFENSTEIN
KIM B NGUYEN
PAMELA M HADDAD
SCOTT C STILES
MEENA YOO
TERESA L POMEROY
VERONICA AVILA
NOELLE N KIM
MARIEL MORAN
KRISTY H THAI
VY D HO
VILMA C KLOESS
TAMMY LE
MARIA A NAVAR.RD
QUANG NGUYEN
THYANA T PHI
TANYA L TO
ELAINE TRUONG
SYLVIA GARCIA
RETA J WESTON
KAREN M HARRIS
JANET J CHUNG
MARGARITA ABOLA
AI N BUI
ROBERT W MAY
SELAMAWIT NIGATU
HELENE WHITI'AKER DEGEN
CORINNE L HOFFMAN
ANGELA M MENDEZ
ANH PHAM
JAIME F CHAVEZ
NEAL M MANALANSAN
SANDRA E SEGAWA
PAUL GUERRERO
JULIE A ASHLEIGH
RITA M CRAMER
RYAN J DAKE
TODD C HARTWIG
4780.28
1"197 .65
2083.21.
3043.68
700.57
843. 84
270.44
503.02
226 .26
68.66 1.32.70
280.23
1.991.53
7377 .16
2353.94
361.2.49
21.84.68 2367.21
2697.24
2848. 07
2058. 96
2585.65
1376.20
2570.01
2551. 63
2796 .12
1.51.3.37 1741.79
2637.17
B65.61
2328.2.9
3242.66
1998.18
1793. 00
1. 703 . 5.0
2381.35
735.63
2486.74
21.11. 49
1727.16
1737.66
1.889.98
3824.94
2723 .35
2018.20
2434.16
2302.10
2829.18
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/16/21 PAGE 2 D389698
D389700
D389702
D389704
D389706
D389708
D389710
D389712
D389714
D389716
D389718
D389720
D389722
D389724
D389726
D38972B
D389730
D389732
D389734
D389736
D389738
D389740
D389742
D389744
D389746
D389748
D389750
D389752
D389754
D389756
D389758
D389760
D389762
D389764
D389766
D389768
D389770
D389772
D389774
D389776
D389778
D389780
D389782
D389784
D389786
D389788
D389790
D389792
RALPH V HERNANDEZ
AARON J HODSON
PHU T NGUYEN
CHRISTOPHER CHUNG
HUONG Q LY
MARIA L MARTINEZ
MONICA COVARRUBIAS
AMEENAH ABU HAMDIYYAH
ORLINO CAMPOS REFUERZO J
TIMOTHY E THRONE
DANIEL J CANDELARIA
KAMYAR DIBAJ
NICOLAS C HSIEH
SHAN L LEWIS
JUAN C NAVARRO
TREVOR G SMOUSE.
JOSE A VASQUEZ
KHANG L VU
JOSHUA ARIONUS
JAN BERGER
TIM P CANNON
RYAN H DAVIS
CHRIS N ESCOBAR
ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ
LARRY GRIFFIN
RYANS HART
VIDAL JIMENEZ
SAMUEL K KIM
DAVID MA AE
ALFREDO MARTINEZ
JESSE K MONTGOMERY
STEVEN J MOYA JR
KIRK L NATLAND
LISA NGUYEN
ANDREW I ORNELAS
CELESTINO J PASILLAS
DYLLAN TUAN ANH PHAM ADA
CHRISTOPHER B PRUDHOMME
JONATHAN RUIZ
ADRIAN M SARMIENTO
ALBERT TALAMANTES JR
ALEJANDRO VALENZUELA JR
RONALD J WOLLAND
ALICE K FREGOSO
WILLIAM E MURRAY JR
ANA G VERGARA NEAL
EDWARD D AMBRIZ GARCIA
RAYMOND A BUCHLER
**** PAGE TOTAL 244512.21
2296.21
2269.24
3841.66
2745.28
2159.96
2366.13
3558:74
2096.19
544.95
1976.36
4108.15
798.92
3638.47
2904.07
2990.42
2395.68
2511.68
3232.27
2096.55
2366.21
3180.00
1757.84
4872 .66
2780.93
4282.50
1768.59
2001. 71
3832.64
1802.92
1962.53
2255. 77
2856 .04
1264.77
653.85
2188.42
2874.55
517.17
2046.87
5735.19
2500.60
2141.46
1524.81
1524.16
2027.24
6475.30
2879.21
1873.97
1449.72
D389699
D389701
D389703
D389705
D389707
D389709
D389711
D389713
D389715
D389717
D389719
D389721
D389723
D389725
D389727
D389729
D389731
D389733
D389735
D389737
D389739
D389741
D389743
D389745
D389747
D389749
D389751
D389753
D389755
D389757
D389759
D389761
D389763
D389765
D389767
D389769
D389771
D389773
D389775
D389777
D389779
D389781
D389783
D389785
D389787
D389789
D389791
D389793
ARMANDO HERRERA JR
SVETLANA MOURE
JAKE P TRAN
PRIIT J KASKLA
LEE W MARINO
MARIA C PARRA
GRACE E LEE
GREG BLODGETT
ROY N ROBBINS
MICHAEL C BOS
VINCENT L DE LA ROSA
ALICIA M HOFER
ROSEMARIE JACOT
NAVIN B MARU
MICHAEL F SANTOS
MARK P UPHUS
DAI C VU
CHRISTOPHER L ALLEN
ALEJANDRO BANUELOS
ROBERT P BERMUDEZ
CARINA M DAN
RONALD W DIEMERT
JEREMY J GLENN
MICHAEL J GRAY
ROBERT A HAENDIGES
EDWARD A HUY
LIYAN JIN
REBECCA PIK KWAN LI
RAQUEL K MANSON
TYLER MEISLAHN
JUSTIN M MORRIS
BASIL G MURAD
DUC TRUNG NGUYEN.
CORNELIU NICOLAE
DAVID A ORTEGA
WILLIAM F PEARSON
JESSICA J POLIDORI
LES A RUITENSCHILD
ALEXIS SANTOS
TOMMY T SON
MINH K TRAN
ALEJANDRO N VALENZUELA
VICTOR K YERGENSEN
ALICIA R GARCIA
EMILY H TRIMBLE
ALFRED J AGUIRRE
RODOLPHO M BECERRA
EDGAR A CANO
704.30
2287.28
782.21
2080.32
4299.34
3202.58
2643.39
3438.94
3476.53
2181. 51
2448.18
1989.51
2415.84
4849.16
3639.54
4645.64
4230.22
283.50
1905.9S
904.75
2360.30
2220.S6
1557.65
851.38
3439.63
2225.19
2501.18
4096.40
2776. 51
2078.61
1996.94
3139.09
2402.43
1778.98
3589.12
2391.13
319-4 .44
499.02
1296.03
2087.74
4684.25
5705.63
3114 .05
873.43
2310.86
3129 .28
2215.33
1659.80
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/16/21 PAGE 3 D389794
D389796
D389798
D389800
D389802
D389804
D389806
D389808
D3B981.0
D389812
D389814
D389B16
D389818
D389820
D389822
D389824
D389826
D389828
D389830
D389832
D389834
D389836
D38983B
D389840
D389842
D389844
D389846
D389848
D389850
D389852
D389854
D389856
D389858
D389860
D389862
D389864
D389866
D389868
D389870
D389872
D389874
D389876
D389878
D389880
D389882
D389884
D389886
D389888
ALBERT J CARRISOZA
JULIET COTTON
ALBERT R EURS II
CASEY G GIROUARD
DARNELL D JERRY
MARK W LADNEY
DIEGO A MEJIA
STEVEN T ORTIZ
RICHARD L PINKSTON
STEVE J TAUANU'U
RICKS ZIEGLER
SYLVESTER A BABINSKI IV
JEFFREY G CANTRELL
CECELIA A FERNANDEZ
JORGE GONZALEZ
RONALD D GUSMAN
ERIC W JOHNSON
KHUONG NGUYEN
RAFAEL ROBLES
EDWIN O THURMAN JR
EVARISTO VERA
ANSELMO AGUIRRE
PHILLIP J CARTER
AARON R HANSEN
MATTHEW D ILFELD
DANIEL C MOSS
RICARDO SALDIVAR
LUIS A TAPIA
JOSEPH E TRUJILLO
JESSE GUZMAN
DOUGLAS A MOORE
AUSTIN H POWELL
STEPHEN D SUDDUTH
SOUMELIA K GOUNTOUMA
VICTOR T BLAS
JOSE GOMEZ
BRENT W HAYES
ALLEN G KIRZHNER
STEPHEN PORRAS
JOHN ZAVALA
STEPHANIE AMBRIZ
ALEX C BEARD
RENE CAMARENA
AMANDA D CROSS
KENNETH E CUMMINGS
GABRIELA DIAZ
MARK C FREEMAN
VANESSA L GARCIA
**** PAGE TOTAL 172480 .14
2507.03
1790.20
2937 .56
1550.17
828. 71
2850.86
1999.19
2484.91
2606.70
2271.25
256.85
1851.06
2203.49
1254.35
1210.73
1106.07
1973.92
1268_72
2280.17
1004.69
1766.61
2156.36
2660.09
1182 .17
1744.37
1213.35
596 .13
2506.62
1326.70
2365.77
2377.30
2154.56
2703.78
2376 .13
3361. 56
2057.62
3164.30
3174.35
3562.49
307B.84
570.10
116.54
2155.10
1673.53
1303.18
833.61
3239.52
513.95
D389795
D389797
D389799
D389801
D389803
D389805
D389807
D389809
D389811
D389813
D389B15
D389817
D389B19
D389821
D389823
D389825
D389827
D389829
D389831
D389833
D389835
D389837
D389839
D389841
D389843
D389845
D389847
D389849
D389851
D389853
D389855
D389857
D389859
D389861
D389863
D389865
D389867
D389869
D389871
D389873
D389875
D389877
D389879
D389881
D389883
D389885
D389887
0389889
GABRIELA R CONTRERAS
ERIC M ESPINOZA
ROBERT J FRANCO
HERMILO HERNANDEZ
BRENT KAYLOR
RAUL LEYVA
RIGOBERTO MENDEZ
PHILLIP Q PHAM
ALEXIS P TARIN
SHAQUANNA D WESTON
IOAN ANDREI
DONEISHA L BELL
JULIA ESPINOZA
DIANA GOMEZ
MICHAEL R GREENE
GLORIA A HARO
LEONEL A LAMAS
DELFRADO C REYES
ADRIANNA M RODRIGUEZ
RODERICK THURMAN
RICHARD L WILLIAMS
DOMINIC CAMERA
RICK L DUVALL
HUY HOA HUYNH
BRYAND KWIATKOWSKI
ROLANDO QUIROZ
WILLIAM A SOTO
MICHAEL W THOMPSON
WILLIAM J WHITE
MARK M KHALIL
ANDREW J MORELAND
MELVIN P REED
HILLARD J WILLIAMS
ALBERT J HOLMON III
FRANK X DE LA ROSA
MICHAEL V GUERRERO
FRANK D HOWENSTEIN
BRANDON S NUNES
JESSE VIRAMONTES
YOLANDA A ALVARADO
REBECCA J BAILOR
RACHEL M CAMARENA
VICTORIA M CASILLAS
GISELL L CRUZ
MARLY DELGADO CHAVEZ
KELDEN A DOWNS
JARED D GARCIA
JENNIFER DANIELLE GODDAR
2540.74
1888.94
747.88
388.15
2222.70
2993.64
3877.15
1523.23
2214. 79
1247 .. 69
1040.63
776.38
1285.47
1009.82
2019.32
1223. 72
973.07
1268. 72
1149.54
1799.34
2048 .46
734.61
3528.83
2333.37
2255.62
1844.64
1512.01
3349.48
2302.91
2094.75
608.91
1751.44
8 .10
3483.32
1934.50
1741.17
2493.88
1586.41
1556.81
687.50
461.77
2242.58
2522.41
812.87
4 72. 88
403.73
586.68
2758.32
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/16/21 PAGE 4 D389890
D389892
D389894
D389896
D389898
D389900
D389902
D389904
D389906
D389908
D389910
D389912
D389914
D389916
D389918
D389920
D389922
D389924
D389926
D389928
D389930
D389932
D389934
D389936
D389938
D389940
D389942
D389944
D389946
D389948
D389950
D389952
D389954
D389956
•D389958
D389960
D389962
D389964
D389966
D389968
D389970
D389972
D389974
D389976
D38997B
D389980
D389982
D389984
STEVEN E GOMEZ
ELAINE M MA AE
JUAN MEDINA
JOHN A MONTANCHEZ
ALEXANDER H NGUYEN
NATALIE NODAL
CHRISTIAN PANGAN
JANET E PELAYO
SHADY S PUAILOA
SUGEIRY REYNOSO
MARINA Y ROMERO
TANYA ROSAS
DIANA SALDIVAR
EMERON J SCHLUMPBERGER
MYCHAELLA J SIEVE
REBECCA S SMITH
KENNETH P TRAVIS III
CLAUDIA VALDIVIA
DAISY O VENCES
PAULE VICTORIA
DAVID M WILMES
THOMAS R DARE
KRISTEN A BACKOURIS
GENA M BOWEN
NICHOLAS A DE ALMEIDA LO
HELENA ELSOUSOU
AI KELLY HUYNH
ALLYSON T LE
ELLENS LOPEZ
LINDA M MORIN
LUIS A PAYAN
REYNA ROSALES
MICHAEL J VISCOMI
MADELINE M ALVARADO
ALFREDO R AVALOS
JEFFREY A BROWN
DARRYL B CORTEZ JR
CHARLIE DANIELEY III
TANNER C DE PADUA
BROC D DUDLEY
JESUS FAJARDO
ROBERT D FRESENIUS
JESUS GOMEZ
JOSE D HERRERA
KIRK P HURLEY
NICKOLAS K JENSEN
CHAD B KIM
TIMOTHY P KOVACS
**** PAGE TOTAL 323606.98
863.46
2635.26
2251.08
4968.93
355.55
310.30
166.23
2903.81
291.36
2426.51
2023.26
174.82
287.83
1156.02
553.76
424.04
473.46
3095.33
159.25
1368.80
504.62
5997.58
1696.55
1926.03
4367.87
2536.15
2493.59
1845.42
632.25
3938.05
24294.50
1878.05
3509.58
1681..42
3055.67
14809.72
4488.60
2115 .52
4380.19
7374.97
2654.32
6268.45
6578.01
3507.02
3497.09
2679.98
8576.08
11435.09
D389891
D389893
D389895
D389897
D389899
D389901
D389903
D389905
D389907
D389909
D389911
D389913
D389915
D389917
D389919
D389921
D389923
D389925
D389927
D389929
D389931
D389933
D389935
D389937
D389939
D389941
D389943
D389945
D389947
D389949
D389951
D389953
D389955
D389957
D389959
D389961
D389963
D389965
D389967
D389969
D38997l
D389973
0389975
D389977
D389979
D389981
D389983
D389985
JACOB R GRANT
JESUS MEDINA
JESSICA MENDOZA
KIRSTEN K NAKAISHI
NOEL N NICHOLAS
GABRIELA OCADIZ HERNANDE
ALEXANDER G PASZKIEWICZ
EDOUARD T PHAN
ALONDRA RAYO
CATIA J RIVERA
MARIA D ROSALES
VANESSA ROSAS
DANA MARIE SAUCEDO
SAMANTHA M SERNA
LAUREN ROSE EMIKO N SING
ANNIE NGAN TRAN-LUONG
KATHY TU
JEFFREY VAN SICKLE
JOSHUA VENCES
JACOB D VIRAMONTES
PEDRO R ARELLANO
CAROLE A KANEGAE
SHARON S BAEK
JESENIA CAMPOS
AMIR A EL FARRA
BRIAN C GIRGENTI
MICHAEL J JENSEN
DAVID A LOPEZ
MATIHEW P MARCHAND
JOSHUA T OLIVO
PHILLIP H PHAM
ROBERT M STEPHENSON III
GIOVANNI ACOSTA
TIMOTHY R ASHBAUGH
COLLINE BAKER
THOMAS A CAPPS
GARY L COULTER
ISAAC DAVILA
RONALD A DOSCHER
STEPHEN C ESTLOW
HECTOR FERREIRA JR
JASON S FULTON
TRAVIS J HADDEN
JASON A HOWARD
DONALD J HUTCHINS
SERGIO J JIMENEZ TAVAREZ
LEAK KOVACS
MICHAEL J LANG
2058.57
1875.70
290_ 91
880.21
1126.31
4586.58
129 .29
294.30
116.36
129.29
619.08
l.22.82
3224.20
593.68
187.47
122.06
77.57 2320.93
381.26
363.87
11450.05
2757.44
2540.92
2175.18
4616.40
3682.05
4310. 75
588.36
7543.82
13579.95
2827.09
4602.52
2726.31
l.0643.50
2699.19
5371.13
2807.49
10379.56
737.14
2092.52
2626.23
2885.58
2368.03
4153 .12
3591.74
5554.28
11403.65
7781.09
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/16/21-PAGE 5 D389986
D389988
D389990
D389992
D389994
D389996
D389998
D390000
D390002
D390004
D390006
D390008
D390010
D390012
D390014
D390016
D390018
D390020
D390022
D390024
D390026
D390028
D390030
D390032
D390034
D390036
D390038
D390040
D390042
D390044
D390046
D390048
D390050
D390052
D390054
D390056
D390058
D390060
D390062
D390064
D390066
D390068
D390070
D390072
D390074
D390076
D390078
D390080
RAPHAEL M LEE
JORGE L MAZON
MITCHEL S MOSSER
BRANDON J PAQUA
JASON S PERKINS
SINDY RAMIREZ OROZCO
THOMAS S REED
AARON T SHIPLEY
CHARLES W STARNES
VINCENTE J VAICARO
DANIEL C VIGIL
SARAH A WRIGHT
DAVID C YOUNG
CLAUDIA ALARCON
FRANCISCO AVALOS JR
JAMES A BLUM
RYAN V BUSTILLOS
DAVID Y H CHANG
HAN J CHO
JUAN L DELGADO JR
CHRISTOPHER M EARLE
JOSHUA N ESCOBEDO
GEORGE R FIGUEREDO
GONZALO GONZALEZ JR
WILLIAM T HOLLOWAY
CODY M JOHNSON
PETER M KUNKEL
RAFAEL LOERA JR
ROBERTO MACHUCA
NATHAN D MORTON
PATRICK J MUSCHETTO
JEFFREY C NGUYEN
JOSEPH N PANELLA
LUIS A QUIROZ
RON A REYES
SEAN M SALAZAR
CHRISTOPHER M SHELGREN
PAUL W ASHBY
SHELBY KEUILIAN
JEREMY N MORSE
ROCKY F RUBALCABA
DANIELLE E WREN
JOHN J YERGLER
KRISTOFER D KELLEY
CHARLES H LOFFLER
GIANLUCA F MANIACI
GAREY D STAAL
AARON J COOPMAN
**** PAGE TOTAL 573794.58
945.60
10228. 71
3248.88
2193.51
4712 .28
8491.01
2528.54
2691.92
3477 .27
14418.63
7384.34
2983.46
4125.38
3506.99
5113. 81
4168.46
5095.42
5614.43
3653.91
4894.99
12699.84
3088.77
2527.21
6693.79
3971. 06
8427.58
3354.79
3621.31
8851.33
10387.59
11309.24
6860.43
4015.44
2546.76
9435.84
2972. 72
10895.62
5214.38
2548.02
6120.29
3669.47
5060.32
9707.42
2727.56
4075.41
3792.03
6165.29
5489.74
D389987
D389989
D389991
D389993
D389995
D389997
D389999
D390001
D390003
D390005
D390007
D390009
D390011
D390013
D390015
D390017
D390019
D390021
D390023
D390025
D390027
D390029
D390031
D390033
D39003S
D390037
D390039
D390041
D390043
D390045
D390047
D390049
D390051
D390053
D390055
D390057
D390059
D390061
D390063
D390065
D390067
D390069
D390071
D390073
D390075
D390077
D390079
D390081
RYAN M LUX
MICHAEL A MOSER
JACOB J NEELY
OMAR F PEREZ
COREY T POLOPEK
JOHN E RANEY
BRYANT D RICHARDS
SHAYLEN L SIMONS
PAUL M TESSIER
EDGAR VALENCIA
ROYCE C WIMMER
COLE A YNIGUEZ
MARCOS R ALAMILLO
BOBBY B ANDERSON
JOHN F BANKSON
TROY F BOWMAN
JUAN C CENTENO
JEROME L CHEATHAM
BRIAN M CLASBY JR
TAYLOR M DUARTE
OTTO J ESCALANTE
MICHELLE N ESTRADA MONSA
SEAN M GLEASON
KYLEN HALEY
EFRAIN A JIMENEZ JR
ROBERT J KIVLER
ERICK LEYVA
JESSE A LUCATERO
TAYLOR A MACY
PATRICK W MURPHY
THOMAS R NADOLSKI
STEVEN TRUJILLO ORTIZ
EMMANUEL PEREZ
LUIS F RAMIREZ
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
ALFREDO SALGADO JR.
LEVI JOENIEL SILVA
MICHAEL K ELHAMI
DANNY J MIHALIK
JASON M MURO
LINO G SANTANA
DUO XU
BENJAMIN M ELIZONDO
NICHOLAS A LAZENBY
BRADLEY A LOWEN
RYAN R RICHMOND
JOSHUA K BEHZAD
MICHAELE GERDIN
4951.81
1670.73
5463.64
3032.38
3491.09
4166.78
4299.79
-
8050.88
15346.66
6592.19
5832.06
3730 .37
4074.07
3126 .25
4908.61
8736.96
7636.56
20070.24
1717.35
8331.68
5999.93
2825.02
3064.25
5196.77
11228.98
2620.08
15154.69
2442.72
2957. 72
2508.78
8350.37
2224.96
2990.07
3547.62
4732.93
7704.61
2508.18
6384.51
11057.86
6077.30
13001. 75
2025.19
17351. 72
18474 .33
2876.91
8389.86
2899.94
8260.64
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/16/21 PAGE 6 D390082
D390084
D390086
D390088
D390090
D390092
D390094
0390096
D390098
D390100
0390102
D3901.04
D390106
D390108
D390110
D390112
D390114
D390116
D390118
D390120
D390122
D390124
D390126
D390128
D390130
D390132
D390134
D390136
D390138
D390140
D390142
D390144
D390146
D390148
D390150
D390152
D390154
D390156
D390158
D390160
D390162
D390164
D390166
D390168
D390170
D390172
D390174
D390176
TROY HALLER
RAUL MURILLO JR
RENE BARRAZA
DEREK M LINK
LISA A BELTHIUS
RANDY G CHUNG
JOHN DANG
DANIELS EDWARDS
EDUARDO C LEIVA
JOHN O OJEISEKHOBA
RODOLFO B RAMOS
CALEB I VAUGHN
KAREN D BRAME
KORY C FERRIN
VICTORIA M FOSTER
KENNETH E MERRILL
TRENTON L RASMUSSEN
WILLIAM ALLISON
BEAU A BERENGER
PATRICIA C FLINN
JENNIFER L ITURRALDE
REBECCA S MEEKS
MARIA A ALCARAZ
ANGELICA BELLO
BRITTANEE N BRANTNER
TAMMY L CHAURAN HAIRGROV
KRISTINA L CORNETT
VERONICA FRUTOS
PINKY C HINGCO
MARIA C MCFARLANE
KAYLYN C RAMIREZ
KIMBRA S VELLANOWETH
SHANNON M YELENSKY
SHYLER R.D. CHAPPELL
KATHERINE M FRANCISCO
LA.UREN M LADD
MELISSA MENDOZA CAMPOS
CRISTINA V PAYAN
TANYA L SAMOFF
NICOLE D SHORROW
DANNY J SOSEBEE
SPENCER T TRAN
CHERYLL WHITNEY
DANIEL A CAMARA
PETE GARCIA
STEVEN H HEINE
JOSEPH L KOLANO
DAVID LOPEZ
**** PAGE TOTAL 284639.31
5539.99
4419.28
6077.49
3744.79
278.61
80.80 304.56
532.17
5702. 90
278.61
232.72
468.23
1143. 62
4287.00
5818.73
570.34
1430.47
4673.41
3982.79
2653.16
979.49
5950.42
2069.99
1629.31
1760.32
1496.66
1642.89
1290.80
2778.48
2076.16
1719 .25
2057.28
1809.52
2042.95
2482.45
2628.37
3705.01
2501-.46
3420.89
3644.40
1915.54
2463.48
2527.32
8954.35
7143.50
2844.97
9923. 67
3359.17
D390083
D390085
D39008?
D390089
D390091
D390093
D390095
D390097
D390099
D390101
D390103
D390105
D390107
D390109
D390111
D390113
D390115
D390117
D390119
D390121
D390123
D390125
D390127
D390129
D390131
D390133
D390135
D390137
D390139
D390141
D390143
D390145
D390147
D390149
D390151
D390153
D390155
D390157
D390159
D390161
D390163
0390165
D390167
D390169
D390171
D390173
D390175
0390177
JASON L JOHNSON
ERIC T RUZIECKI
JULIO C CORTEZ
ADAM D ZMIJA
RICHARDO BURILLO
COURTNEY P CIBOSKY
CHRISTOPHER C DOVEAS
EDWARD K KIM
MARIO MARTINEZ JR
JOSEPH A GARCIA
RUDY A ROCHA
TYLER D VU
KENNETH L CHISM
JAMES D FISCHER
THI A HUYNH
DOUGLAS A PLUARD
TUONG-VAN NGUYEN VU
RICHARD A ALVAREZ BROWN
BRIAND DALTON
PATRICK E GILDEA
RAQUEL D MATA
JONATHAN B WAINWRIGHT
MARIA S ATWOOD
RYANS BERLETH
CARISSA L BRUNICK
JACINTA F CHOWDHURY
RUSSELL B DRISCOLL
DAVID L GEORGE
LINDALINH THU LY
TRINA T NGUYEN
JENNIFER V ROMBOUGH
CHRYSTAL L WEYKER
SANDRA M ARROYO
JENNIFER A DIX
AMANDA B GARNER
ROBERT D LUX
BRANDY J PARK
JENNIFER M RODRIGUEZ
SUSAN A I SEYMOUR
HEATHER P SLETTVET
MARSHA D SPELLMAN
SANTA WARDLE
EVANS BERESFORD
JAMES D FRANKS
ROBERT J GIFFORD
GERALD F JORDAN
BAO TINH THI LE
MARK A LORD
4772 .28
3329.51
4565.03
3772.63
5136. 79
3041. 75
240.97
1381.66
5685.17
219.79
478.37
489.31
1944.69
1093. 54
19428.99
4079.81
2126. 91
3145 .05
3026.29
3191. 55
1399 .24
4071. 95
1950.57
2150.04
1904.35
1721.41
1983.36
2513. 86
1695.40
2139 .18
2580.36
1714.46
1905.07
2596.17
970.53
2323.51
2880.73
2737.89
2548.42
1932.55
2929 .19
1255.02
2924. 78
3064.85
3831. 06
2847.28
1898.64
11981.58
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/16/21 PAGE 7 D390178 STEVEN W LUKAS 2048. 48 D390179 BRYAN J MEERS 4512.08 D390180 ADAM C NIKOLIC 5949. 23 D390l8l TERRA M RAMIREZ 6427.89 0390182 CHRISTINE ROGERS 3293.26 D390183 BRIANT STROUD 3910.65 D390184 DENNIS WARDLE 4092.58 D390185 SUMMER A BOGUE 2197.88 D390186 FLOR DE LIS ELIZONDO 2278.57 D390187 ASHLEY C ROJAS 2130 .35 D390188 ASHLEIGH R ANDERSON CAMB 2696.03 D390189 JANNA K BRADLEY 2317. 72 D390190 MARY C CERDA 2108.27 D390191 BRANDI M HART 695.25 D390192 LIANE Y KWAN 3486.82 D390193 JANY H LEE 3800.19 D390194 SHERRILL A MEAD 2426. 90 D390195 STEPHANIE E RICHARDS 1903.60 D390196 CAITLYN M STEPHENSON 2408.89 D390197 LAURA J STOVER 5187.23 D390198 ANNAL GOLD 2038.39 D390199 KATRENA J SCHULZE 2474.51 D390200 MATTHEW T SWANSON 2266.90 D390201 ANTHONY VALENZUELA 1620. 94 D390202 CANDY G WILDER 2078.18 D390203 STEVEN F ANDREWS 2511. 87 D390204 TERENCE S CHANG 2900.49 D390205 VERNAL ESPINOZA 2127.80 D390206 CESAR GALLO 2889.67 D390207 ERNIE E HINGCO 1949.62 D390208 GEOFFREY A KLOESS 3592.66 D390209 RACHOT MORAGRAAN 3983.87 D390210 NOEL J PROFFITT 3074.87 D390211 ANAND V RAO 4615.05 D390212 ROD T VICTORIA 2414.64 D390213 TERREL KEITH WINSTON 3163. 08 D390214 O.C.E.A. GENERAL 2321.88 D390215 O.C.E.A. 1101.61 D390216 POLICE ASSN 15579.66 D390217 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITI 45.00 D390218 GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSO 1600.00 D390219 SO CAL CREDIT UNION 44185.00 D390220 SOUTHLAND CREDIT UNION 11775.00 W2862 GREAT WEST LIFE 457 #340 111547.68 W2863 GREAT WEST LIFE OBRA#340 2981. 32 W2864 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 450069.54 W2865 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT D 152258.55
*""** PAGE TOTAL = 901039.65
TOTAL CHECK PAYMENTS 18 34,598.82
TOTAL DIRECT DEPOSITS 601 1,965,902.53
TOTAL WIRE PAYMENTS 4 716,857.09
GRAND TOTAL PAYMENTS 623 i: 1i 1 ::358: ~~ ·tu<
Checks #184783 thru #184799, and Direct Deposits #D389620 thru #D390220, and wire #W2862 thru #W2865 presented in the Payroll Register submitted to the Garden Grove City Council 11 JAN 2022, have been audited for accuracy and funds are available for payment thereof. 2>
'RICIA SONG -FINANCE DIRECTOR
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/30/21 PAGE 1 184800
184802
184804
184806
184808
184810
184812
184814
184816
D390220
D390222
D390224
D390226
D390228
D390230
D390232
D390234
D390236
D390238
D390240
D390242
D390244
D390246
D390248
D390250
D390252
D390254
D390256
D390258
D390260
D390262
D390264
D390266
D390268
D390270
D390272
D390274
0390276
D390278
D390280
D390282
D390284
D390286
D390288
D390290
D390292
D390294
D390296
HOAI TRUONG H NGUYEN
JUDITII A MOORE
MICHAEL F ROCHA
DAMIAN JESUS CHAVEZ
JESSICA CEDILLO PADILLA
AARON D DINH
LAURA M PACHECO
SAMANTHA B VARGAS
STEPHEN J VARGAS
PHAT T BUI
STEPHANIE L KLOPFENSTEIN
KIM B NGUYEN
PAMELA M HADDAD
SCOTT C STILES
MERNA YOO
TERESA L POMEROY
VERONICA AVILA
NOELLE N KIM
MARIEL MORAN
KRISTY H THAI
VY D HO
VILMA C KLOESS
TAMMY LE
MARIA A NAVARRO
QUANG NGUYEN
TIIYANA T PHI
TANYA L TO
ELAINE TRUONG
SYLVIA GARCIA
RETA J WESTON
KAREN M HARRIS
JANET J CHUNG
MARGARITA ABOLA
AI N BUI
ROBERT W MAY
TINA HUONG NGO
MY TRA VO
KAREN J BROWN
EDWARD E MARVIN JR
JENNIFER L PETERSON
EVA RAMIREZ
GARY F HERNANDEZ
DANIEL J SANCHEZ
ALANA R CHENG
LISA L KIM
MICHAEL G AUSTIN
BRYSON T DAHLHEIMER
DAVID A DENT
**** PAGE TOTAL 223042.54
1201. 69
2083 .. 21
2177. 51
700.57.
609.35
258.58
122.82·
363.87
400.BO
167.21
231.25
368.78
1991.53
10888.59
2353.94
3612.49
2184. 68
3594.50
2697.24
2569.76
3189.61
2585.65
2461.92
2570.01
3148 .56
2796.12
1513.37
1741. 79
2390.77
1174.87
2328. 29·
2767.21
9889.08
955.19
1360.12
2862.86
5554.60
287.91
2002.71
1980.78
2049. 77
1833.74
1700.63
3378.94
6350.88
2600 .35
2290.91
4938.03
184801
184803
184805
184807
184809
184811
184813
184815
D390219
D390221
D390223
D390225
D390227
D390229
D390231
D390233
D390235
D390237
D390239
D390241
D390243
D390245
D390247
D390249
D390251
D390253
D390255
D390257
D390259
D390261
D390263
D390265
D390267
D390269
D390271
D390273
D390275
D390277
D390279
D390281
D390283
D390285
D390287
D390289
D390291
D390293
D390295
D390297
KENNETH H LE
DIANE BELAIR
SUSAN VITALI
ARTHUR J FLORES
DEANNA M CHUMACERO
SAMANTHA ORDUNO
BRANDON J TAING
PATRICK R JULIENNE
GEORGES BRIETIGAM III
STEVEN R JONES
DIEDRE THU HA NGUYEN
JOHN R ONEILL
SHAWN S PARK
MARIA A STIPE
AMANDA M POLLOCK
LIZABETH C VASQUEZ
JEFFREY P DAVIS
RACHEL MENDIOLA
ANA E PULIDO
SHAUNA J CARRENO
DANNY HUYNH
IVY LE
LINDA MIDDENDORF
PHUONG VIENT NGUYEN
TINA T NGUYEN
MARIA RAMOS
CUONG K TRAN
THANH-NGUYEN VO
YUAN SONG
MARIA ALINA CURTSEIT
CHRISTI C MENDOZA
ANN C EIFERT
MARISA ATIN RAMOS
KEISUKE FUKAZAWA
HEIDY Y MUNOZ
SELAMAWIT NIGATU
HELENE WHITTAKER DEGEN
CORINNE L HOFFMAN
ANGELA M MENDEZ
ANH PHAM
JAIME F CHAVEZ
NEAL M MANALANSAN
SANDRA E SEGAWA
PAUL GUERRERO
JULIE A ASHLEIGH
RITA M CRAMER
RYAN J DAKE
TODD C HARTWIG
lJ..45.44
2091. 62
778 .20
2872.98
771.30
913 .17
103.43
3410.12
360.60
341.74
365.02
394 .37
2560.17
5567. 71
1860.83
2286.45
1682.40
1068.78
4100.76
2096.78
4781. 72
2155.88
3482.93
2159.48
2026.62
2434.39
5017 .22
1929.43
4952 .13
1785.26
1048.28
3282.04
1401.63
1444.41
3441.03
2461.47
431.95
2486.74
2289.39
1727.16
1737.66
2053.11
4150. 71
2723.35
2018 .20
2434.16
2302~10
2829.18
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/30/21 PAGE 2 D390298
D390300
D390302
D390304
D390306
D390308
D390310
D390312
D390314
D390316
D390318
D390320
D390322
D390324
D390326
D390328
D390330
D390332
D390334
D390336
D390338
D390340
D390342
D390344
D390346
D390348
D390350
D390352
D390354
D390356
D390358
D390360
D390362
D390364
D390366
D390368
D390370
D390372
D390374
D390376
D390378
D390380
D390382
D390384
D390386
D390388
D390390
D390392
RALPH V HERNANDEZ
AARON J HODSON
PHU T NGUYEN
CHRISTOPHER CHUNG
HUONG Q LY
MARIA L MARTINEZ
MONICA COVARRUBIAS
AMEENAH ABU HAMDIYYAH
ORLINO CAMPOS REFUERZO J
TIMOTHY E THRONE
DANIEL J CANDELARIA
KAMYAR DIBAJ
NICOLAS C HSIEH
SHAN L LEWIS
JUAN C NAVARRO
TREVOR G SMOUSE
JOSE A VASQUEZ
KHANG L VU
EDWARD D AMBRIZ GARCIA
ALEJANDRO BANUELOS
ROBERT P BERMUDEZ
CARINA M DAN
RONALD W DIEMERT
JEREMY J GLENN
MICHAEL J GRAY
ROBERT A HAENDIGES
EDWARD A HUY
LIYAN JIN
REBECCA PIK KWAN LI
RAQUEL K MANSON
TYLER MEISLAHN
JUSTIN M MORRIS
BASIL G MURAD
DUC TRUNG NGUYEN
CORNELIU NICOLAE
DAVID A ORTEGA
WILLIAM F PEARSON
JESSICA J POLIDORI
LES A RUITENSCHILD
ALEXIS SANTOS
TOMMY T SON
MINH K TRAN
ALEJANDRO N VALENZUELA
VICTOR K YERGENSEN
ALICIA R GARCIA
EMILY H TRIMBLE
ALFRED J AGUIRRE
RAYMOND A BUCHLER
**** PAGE TOTAL 267445.12
2296.21
5053.23
3841.66
2745.28
2159.96
2366.13
3558.74
3761.19
544.95
2990.10
4108.15
798.92
3388.06
4982.49
2674.41
2395.68
4739.29.
3232.27
1199.13
2145.16
904.75
2360.30
2220.56
1557.65
1112 .38
4629.07
5951.49
2501.18
4096.40
2776 .51
2059.30
26B2.70
30B1.83
2402.43
1941.96
2898.03
3291.59
3194.44
3099.02
1296.03
2035.82
3430.01
2501.97
4396.82
785.29
1851. 32
3043.08
1864.38
D390299
D390301
D390303
D390305
D390307
D390309
D390311
D390313
D390315
D390317
D390319
D390321
D390323
D390325
D390327
D390329
D390331
D390333
D39.0335
D390337
D390339
D390341
D390343
D390345
D390347
D390349
D390351
D390353
D390355
D390357
D390359
D390361
D390363
D390365
D390367
D390369
D390371
D390373
D390375
D390377
D390379
D390381
D390383
D390385
D390387
0390389
D390391
D390393
ARMANDO HERRERA JR
SVETLANA MOURE
JAKE P TRAN
PRIIT J KASKLA
LEE W MARINO
MARIA C PARRA
GRACE E LEE
GREG BLODGETT
ROY N ROBBINS
MICHAEL C BOS
VINCENT L DE LA ROSA
ALICIA M HOFER
ROSEMARIE JACOT
NAVIN B MARU
MICHAEL F SANTOS
MARK P UPHUS
DAI C VU
CHRISTOPHER L ALLEN
JOSHUA ARIONUS
JAN BERGER
TIM P CANNON
RYAN H DAVIS
CHRIS N ESCOBAR
ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ
LARRY GRIFFIN
RYANS HART
VIDAL JIMENEZ
SAMUEL K KIM
DAVID MA AE
ALFREDO MARTINEZ
JESSE K MONTGOMERY
STEVEN J MOYA JR
KIRK L NATLAND
LISA NGUYEN
ANDREW I ORNELAS
CELESTINO J PASILLAS
DYLLAN TIDrn ANH PHAM ADA
CHRISTOPHER B PRUDHOMME
JONATHAN RUIZ
ADRIAN M SARMIENTO
ALBERT TALAMANTES JR
ALEJANDRO VALENZUELA JR
RONALD J WOLLAND
ALICE K FREGOSO
WILLIAM E MURRAY JR
ANA G VERGARA NEAL
RODOLPHO M BECERRA
EDGAR A CANO
1226.66
2287.28
1259. 97
2362.78
4299.34
3202.58
2643.39
3438.94
3221.87
2181.51
2448.18
1939.51
2206.84
4799.16
3639 .54
5069.30
4230.22
283.50
2176.55
3267.75
4932.02
3121. 02
5649.80
3475.58
2754.69
2111.01
2025.45
4539.84
2215.41
3912.53
2255.77
2372.39
1380.81
693.98
2960.90
3040.08
526.95
1837.66
2315.56
3715.32
2141.46
924.87
1524.16
2027.24
6475.30
2829.21
4104.50
2449.42
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/30/21 PAGE 3 D390394
D390396
D390398
D390400
D390402
D390404
D390406
D390408
D390410
D390412
D390414
D390416
D390418
D390420
D390422
D390424
D390426
D390428
D390430
D390432
D390434
D390436
D390438
D390440
D390442
D390444
D390446
D390448
D390450
D390452
D390454
D390456
D390458
D390460
D390462
D390464
D390466
D390468
0390470
D390472
D390474
D390476
D390478
D390480
D390482
D390484
D390486
D390488
ALBERT J CARRISOZA
JULIET COTTON
ALBERT R EURS II
CASEY G GIROUARD
DARNELL D JERRY
MARK W LADNEY
DIEGO A MEJIA
STEVEN T ORTIZ
RICHARD L PINKSTON
STEVE J TAUANlJ'U
IOAN ANDREI
DONEISHA L BELL
JULIA ESPINOZA
DIANA GOMEZ
MICHAEL R GREENE
GLORIA A HARO
LEONEL A LAMAS
DELFRADO C REYES
ADRIANNA M RODRIGUEZ
RODERICK THURMAN
RICHARD L WILLIAMS
DOMINIC CAMERA
RICK L DUVALL
HUY HOA HUYNH
BRYAND KWIATKOWSKI
ROLANDO QUIROZ
WILLIAM A SOTO
MICHAEL W THOMPSON
WILLIAM J WHITE
MARK M KHALIL
ANDREW J MORELAND
MELVIN P REED
HILLARD J WILLIAMS
ALBERT J HOLMON III
FRANK X DE LA ROSA
MICHAEL V GUERRERO
FRANK D HOWENSTEIN
BRANDON S NUNES
JESSE VIRAMONTES
YOLANDA A ALVARADO
REBECCA J BAILOR
RENE CAMARENA
AMANDA D CROSS
KENNETH E CUMMINGS
GABRIELA DIAZ
MARK C FREEMAN
VANESSA L GARCIA
STEVEN E GOMEZ
**** PAGE TOTAL 187947 .35
1943.14
1790,20
3776.95
1771.99
712.96
2850.86
1999.19
2880.68
5634.46
2045.55
1-040. 63
775.26
1285.47
1001.58
2019.32
1212.16
1032.30
1258.16
1149. 54
1799.34
2946.18
790.40
2465.89
2333.37
2022.43
2154 .17
2300.28
3393.00
2302.91
2094.75
884.80
1688.32
203.21
4154.87
2778.06
1992. 90
2493.88
1586.41
1.556.81
282.90
376.08
2155.10
1.673.53
1474.32
506.46
3239.52
386.73
932.08
D390395
0390397
D390399
D390401
D390403
D390405
D390407
D390409
D390411
D390413
D39041.5
D390417
D390419
D390421.
D390423
D390425
0390427
D390429
D390431
0390433
D390435
D390437
D390439
D390441
D390443
D390445
D390447
D390449
D390451
D390453
D390455
D390457
D390459
D390461
D390463
D390465
D390467
D390469
D390471
D390473
D390475
D390477
D390479
D390481
D390483
D390485
D390487
D390489
GABRIELA R CONTRERAS
ERIC M ESPINOZA
ROBERT J FRANCO
HERMILO HERNANDEZ
BRENT KAYLOR
RAUL LEYVA
RIGOBERTO MENDEZ
PHILLIP Q PHAM
ALEXIS P TARIN
SHAQUANNA D WESTON
SYLVESTER A BABINSKI IV
JEFFREY G CANTRELL
CECELIA A FERNANDEZ
JORGE GONZALEZ
RONALD D GUSMAN
ERIC W JOHNSON
KHUONG NGUYEN
RAFAEL ROBLES
EDWIN O THURMAN JR
EVARISTO VERA
ANSELMO AGUIRRE
PHILLIP J CARTER
AARON R HANSEN
MATTHEW D ILFELD
DANIEL C MOSS
RICARDO SALDIVAR
LUIS A TAPIA
JOSEPH E TRUJILLO
JESSE GUZMAN
DOUGLAS A MOORE
AUSTIN H POWELL
STEPHEN D SUDDUTH
SOUMELIA K GOUNTOUMA
VICTOR T BLAS
JOSE GOMEZ
BRENT W HAYES
ALLEN G KIRZHNER
STEPHEN PORRAS
JOHN ZAVALA
STEPHANIE AMBRIZ
RACHEL M CAMARENA
VICTORIA M CASILLAS
GISELL L CRUZ
MARLY DELGADO CHAVEZ
KELDEN A DOWNS
JARED D GARCIA
JENNIFER DANIELLE GOODAR
JACOB R GRANT
6955.77
1869.62
920 .39
365.28
2222.70
3658.B5
2425.83
983.43
6455.64
630.36
2074.95
2342.92
1254 .36
1252.82
1096.21
2144.27
1268.72
1796.64
1013.44
1766.61.
2015.98
2660.09
1456. 94
1315.77
1213.35
1434.30
3790.22
1790.84
1976.21
241B.44
21.81.60 2232.65
2376 .13
31.35 .47
2995.69
3901.63
31.44. 98
2959.82
2199.42
21.1.52 2314.44
2020.47
394.90
539.30
368.94
433.45
2758.32
2058.57
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER l.2/30/21 PAGE 4 D390490
D390492
D390494
D390496
D390498
D390500
D390502
D390504
D390506
D39050B
D390510
D390512
D390514
D390516
D390518
D390520
D390522
D390524
D390526
D390528
D390530
D390532
0390534
D390536
D390538
D390540
D390542
D390544
D390546
D39054B
D390550
D390552
D390554
D390556
D390558
D390560
D390562
D390564
D390566
D390568
D390570
D390572
D390574
D390576
D39057B
D390580
D390582
D390584
SETAREH Z HASHEMI
JESUS MEDINA
JOHN A MONTANCHEZ
ALEXANDER H NGUYEN
NATALIE NODAL
CHRISTIAN PANGAN
JANET E PELAYO
ARIELLE PICKRELL
SUGEIRY REYNOSO
MARINA Y ROMERO
TANYA ROSAS
DANA MARIE SAUCEDO
SAMANTHA M SERNA
LAUREN ROSE EMIKO N SING
KENNETH P TRAVIS III
CLAUDIA VALDIVTh
JOSHUA VENCES
JACOB D VIRAMONTES
PEDRO R ARELLANO
CAROLE A KANEGAE
SHARON S BAEK
RICHARDO BURILLO
NICHOLAS A DE ALMEIDA LO
HELENA. ELSOUSOU
AI KELLY HUYNH
ALLYSON T LE
MATTHEW P MARCHAND
JOSHUA T OLIVO
PHILLIP H PHAM
ROBERT M STEPHENSON III
MADELINE M ALVAR..NJO
ALFREDO R AVALOS
ROBERT D BOYENS III
THOMAS A CAPPS
GARY L COULTER
ISAAC DAVILA
RONALD A DOSCHER
STEPHEN C ESTLOW
HECTOR FERREIRA JR
JASON S FULTON
TRAVIS J HADDEN
JASON A HOWARD
DONALD J HUTCHINS
SERGIO J JIMENEZ TAVAREZ
LEAK KOVACS
MICHAEL J LANG
RYAN M LUX
MICHAEL A MOSER
**** PAGE TOTAL 233424.56
804.26
1960.53
4968.93
240".48
374.94
50.33 2903.81
116. 77
2641. 96
2023.26
422.47
2435.59
424.06
161.62
101.98
3095.33
195.40
270.44
4197.82
2631.03
2108.57
5325. 93
3848.97
3727.53
2808.27
1641. 73
3981.03
4067.03
3334.73
5072. 75
2202.45
3496.B4
1447.07
3530.05
3082.84
3023.19
737.14
2576.18
3028.65
3049.39
2808.61
3922.51
3970.63
2499.05
4296.08
3304.32
4179.04
1670.73
D390491
D390493
D390495
D390497
D390499
D390501
D390503
D390505
D390507
D390509
D390511
D390513
D390515
D390517
D390519
D390521
D390523
D390525
D390527
D390529
D390531
D390533
D390535
D390537
D390539
D390541
D390543
D390545
D390547
D390549
D390551
D390553
D390555
D390557
D390559
D390561
D390563
D390565
D390567
D390569
D390571
D390573
D390575
D390577
D390579
D390581
D390583
D390585
ELAINE M MA AE
JUAN MEDINA
KIRSTEN K NAKAISHI
NOEL N NICHOLAS
GABRIELA OCADIZ HERNANDE
ALEXANDER G PASZKIEWICZ
EDOUARD T PHAN
SHADY S PUAILOA
CATIA J RIVERA
MARIA D ROSALES
DIANA SALDIVAR
EMERON J SCHLUMPBERGER
MYCHAELLA J SIEVE
REBECCA S SMITH
KATHY TU
JEFFREY VAN SICKLE
PAULE VICTORIA
DAVID M WILMES
THOMAS R DARE
KRISTEN A BACKOURIS
GENA M BOWEN
JESENIA CAMPOS
AMIR A EL FARRA
BRIAN C GIRGENTI
MICHAEL J JENSEN
ELLENS LOPEZ
LINDA M MORIN
LUIS A PAYAN
REYNA ROSALES
GIOVANNI ACOSTA
TIMOTHY R ASHBAUGH
COLLINE BAKER
JEFFREY A BROWN
DARRYL B CORTEZ JR
CHARLIE DANIELEY III
TANNER C DE PADUA
BROC D DUDLEY
JESUS FAJARDO
ROBERT D FRESENIUS
JESUS GOMEZ
JOSE D HERRERA
KIRK P HURLEY
NICKOLAS K JENSEN
CHAD B KIM
TIMOTHY P KOVACS
RAPHAEL M LEE
JORGE L MAZON
MITCHEL S MOSSER
2635.26
2251.08
559.92
1525.92
3186.05
155.15
142.22
712.66
374.94
414.32
586.68
685.73
357.41
339.35
155.15
2320.93
1368. 80
492.38
8104.48
1586.99
1926.03
2381.07
4447.01
4101. 94
5022.30
632.25
3938.05
4961.04
2478 .13
2642.40
3067.67
2801.08
4634.87
2434.24
2509.20
2108.60
2858.65
3675.51
3271.03
23-49.63
-4651. 51
2568.01
3064.89
2684.69
3681.41
1010.19
2958.94
3846.-48
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/30/21 PAGE 5 D390586 JACOB J NEELY 2986.46 D390587 BRANDON J PAQUA 2092. 92 D39058B OMAR F PEREZ 3510.53 D390589 JASON S PERKINS 3688 .31 D390590 COREY T POLOPEK 3481.09 D390591 SINDY RAMIREZ OROZCO 4442.1.9 D390592 JOHN E RANEY 4595.02 D390593 THOMAS S REED 3444.58 D390594 BRYANT D RICHARDS 2422.93 D390595 AARON T SHIPLEY 2559.97 D390596 SHAYLEN L SIMONS 2737.66 D390597 CHARLES W STARNES 2768.51 D390598 PAUL M TESSIER 3796.58 D390599 VINCENTE J VAICARO 4097.36 D390600 EDGAR VALENCIA 3B89.71 D390601 DANIEL C VIGIL 2517.11 0390602 ROYCE C WIMMER 4854.92 D390603 SARAH A WRIGHT 3498.64 D390604 COLE A YNIGUEZ 3015.45 D390605 DAVID C YOUNG 4228.96 D390606 MARCOS R ALl\MILLO 3486.20 D390607 CLAUDIA ALARCON 4499.82 D390608 BOBBY B ANDERSON 3604.42 D390609 FRANCISCO AVALOS JR 3353.44 D390610 JOHN F BANKSON 3831.41 D390611 JAMES A BLUM 3829.09 D390612 TROY F BOWMAN 2648.26 D390613 RYAN V BUSTILLOS 4559.26 D39061.4 JUAN C CENTENO 5278.93 D390615 DAVID Y H CHANG 3228.48 D390616 JEROME L CHEATHAM 3036.01 D390617 HAN J CHO 5633.93 D390618 BRIAN M CLASBY JR 1951.46 D39061.9 JUAN L DELGADO JR 3732.28 D390620 TAYLOR M DUARTE 2909.80 D390621 CHRISTOPHER M EARLE 3586 .48 D390622 O'CTO J ESCALANTE 7046.91 D390623 JOSHUA N ESCOBEDO 2971.40 D390624 MICHELLE N ESTRADA MONSA 3314.0-4 D390625 GEORGE R FIGUEREDO 2255.0B D390626 GONZALO GONZALEZ JR 3087.45 D390627 KYLEN HALEY 2720 .27 D390628 WILLIAM T HOLLOWAY 4328.66 D390629 EFRAIN A JIMENEZ JR 31.91. 64 D390630 CODY M JOHNSON 2669.01 D390631 ROBERT J KIVLER 2205.00 D390632 PETER M KUNKEL 3739.71 D390633 ERICK LEYVA 5908.19 D390634 RAFAEL LOERA JR 2769.47 D390635 JESSE A LUCATERO 2990.42 D390636 ROBERTO MACHUCA 2605.3B D390637 TAYLOR A MACY 3270.43 D390638 NATHAN D MORTON 3228.61 D390639 PATRICK W MURPHY 4759.01 D390640 PATRICK J MUSCHETTO 3648.77 D390641 THOMAS R NADOLSKI 2314.05 D390642 JEFFREY C NGUYEN 3746.97 D390643 STEVEN TRUJILLO ORTIZ 2564.54 D390644 JOSEPH N PANELLA 2394.21 D390645 EMMANUEL PEREZ 2711.60 D390646 LUIS A QUIROZ 2895.20 D390647 LUIS F RAMIREZ 3879.45 D390648 TRENTON L RASMUSSEN 1509.17 D390649 RON A REYES 4725.77 D390650 DANIEL RODRIGUEZ 2848.09 D390651. SEAN M SALAZAR 2972. 72 D390652 ALFREDO SALGADO JR. 2509.67 D390653 CHRISTOPHER M SHELGREN 3051..80 D390654 LEVI JOENIEL SILVA 2815.61 D390655 PAUL W ASHBY 4787.1.3 D390656 MICHAEL K ELHAMI 4725. 77 D390657 SHELBY KEUILIAN 3006.17 D39065B DANNY J MIHALIK 5310. 95 D390659 JEREMY N MORSE 5314.96 D390660 JASON M MURO 5825.71 D390661 ROCKY F RUBALCABA 3446.48 D390662 LINO G SANTANA 17048.35 D390663 DANIELLE E WREN 4064.07 D390664 DUO XU 1784.83 D390665 JOHN J YERGLER 5443.33
D390666 BENJAMIN M ELIZONDO 3750.98 D390667 KRISTOFER D KELLEY 2717.56 D390668 NICHOLAS A LAZENBY 3274.59 D390669 CHARLES H LOFFLER 4177.27 D390670 BRADLEY A LOWEN 3168.22 D390671 GIANLUCA F MANIACI 3463.07 D390672 RYAN R RICHMOND 2120.48 D390673 GAREY D STAAL 3531.56 D390674 JOSHUA K BEHZAD 3216.47 D390675 AARON J COOPMAN 3693.19 D390676 MICHAELE GERDIN 3642.74 D390677 TROY HALLER 5694.02 D390678 JASON L JOHNSON 4860.62 D390679 RAUL MURILLO JR 5140.13 D390680 ERIC T RUZIECKI 3832.67 D390681 RENE BARRAZA 4835.10 **** PAGE TOTAL = 357322.89
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/30/21 PAGE 6 D390682
D390684
D390686
D390688
D390690
D390692
D390694
D390696
D390698
D390700
D390702
D390704
D390706
D390708
D390710
D390712
D390714
D390716
D39071-8
D390720
D390722
D390724
D390726
D390728
D390730
D390732
D390734
D390736
D390738
D390740
D390742
D390744
D390746
D390748
D390750
D390752
D390754
D390756
D390758
D390760
D390762
D390764
D390766
D390768
D390770
D390772
D390774
D390776
JULIO C CORTEZ
ADAM D ZMIJA
COURTNEY P CIBOSKY
CHRISTOPHER C DOVEAS
EDWARD K KIM
MARIO MARTINEZ JR
RODOLFO B RAMOS
CALEB I VAUGHN
KAREN D BRAME
KORY C FERRIN
VICTORIA M FOSTER
THI A HUYNH
DOUGLAS A PLUARD
WILLIAM ALLISON
BEAU A BERENGER
PATRICIA C FLINN
JENNIFER L ITURRALDE
REBECCA S MEEKS
MARIA A ALCARAZ
ANGELICA BELLO
BRITTANEE N BRANTNER
TAMMY L CHAURAN HAIRGROV
KRISTINA L CORNETT
VERONICA FRUTOS
PINKY C HINGCO
MARIA C MCFARLANE
KAYLYN C RAMIREZ
KIMBRA S VELLANOWETH
SHANNON M YELENSKY
SHYLER R.D. CHAPPELL
KATHERINE M FRANCISCO
LAUREN M LADD
MELISSA MENDOZA CAMPOS
CRISTINA V PAYAN
TANYA L SAMOFF
NICOLE D SHORROW
DANNY J SOSEBEE
SPENCER T TRAN
CHERYLL WHITNEY
DANIEL A CAMARA
PETE GARCIA
SEAN M GLEASON
GERALD F JORDAN
BAO TINH THI LE
MARK A LORD
BRYAN J MEERS
TERRA M RAMIREZ
BRIANT STROUD
**** PAGE TOTAL 274364.75
2820.05
4943.88
4411.52
290.51
431-.98
4670.46
576.13
305.22
1143.62
4003.27
1858.47
2871.46
4462. 8B
10231.39
3905.45
2653 .16
1062.75
2971.86
2276.46
1251..42
2127.58
1990.44
2437.36
1299. 96
2549.27
2056.63
1719.25
2057.28
2077. 07
3592.27
2653.B2
2961.50
4390.91
3255.64
3748 .12
3407.28
1915.54
5653.45
2192. 68
3149.73
2930. 71
3465.53
3182.78
1898.64
4375.65
4043.48
2816.44
4823.73
D390683
D390685
D390687
D390689
D390691
D390693
0390695
D390697
D390699
D390701
D390703
D390705
D390707
D390709
D390711
D390713
D390715
D390717
D390719
D390721
D390723
0390725
D390727
D390729
D390731
D3 90733
D390735
D390737
D390739
D390741
D390743
D390745
D390747
D390749
D390751
D390753
D390755
D390757
D390759
D390761
D390763
D390765
D390767
D390769
D390771
D390773
D390775
D390777
DEREK M LINK
LISA A BELTHIUS
JOHN DANG
DANIELS EDWARDS
EDUARDO C LEIVA
MICHAEL J VISCOMI
RUDY A ROCHA
TYLER D VU
KENNETH L CHISM
JAMES D FISCHER
JOSEPH A GARCIA
KENNETH E MERRILL
TUONG-VAN NGUYEN VU
RICHARD A ALVAREZ BROWN
BRIAND DALTON
PATRICK E GILDEA
RAQUEL D MATA
JONATHAN B WAINWRIGHT
MARIA S ATWOOD
RYANS BERLETH
CAR.ISSA L BRUNICK
JACINTA F CHOWDHURY
RUSSELL B DRISCOLL
DAVID L GEORGE
LINDALINH THU LY
TRINA T NGUYEN
JENNIFER V ROMBOUGH
CHRYSTAL L WEYKER
SANDRA M ARROYO
JENNIFER A DIX
AMANDA B GARNER
ROBERT D LUX
BRANDY J PARK
JENNIFER M RODRIGUEZ
SUS.AN A I SEYMOUR
HEATHER P SLETTVET
MARSHA D SPELLMAN
SANTA WARDLE
BVAN S BERESFORD
JAMES D FRANKS
ROBERT J GIFFORD
STEVEN H HEINE
JOSEPH L KOLANO
DAVID LOPEZ
STEVEN W LUKAS
ADAM C NIKOLIC
CHRISTINE ROGERS
DENNIS WARDLE
3863.56
185.74
578.66
480.44
5062.83
3913.43
756.67
646.85
2124.05
B33.08
233.82
570.34
4183. 02
3956.75
3210.14
5472. 04
1293.99
4203.68
2076.29
2732.09
3103.93
1737.12
2613.32
3786.81
1622.28
2350.06
2025.14
1816.28
1905.07
3229.05
970.53
3844.75
7826.14
2538.37
5143 .12
2072.64
2702.57
1210.63
3297.93
4158.52
4284.46
2486.14
2491.27
3674.66
2048 .48
5775 .47
4211.53
5146.33
PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER BY WARRANT NUMBER 12/30/21 PAGE 7 0390778 SUMMER A BOGUE
D390780 ASHLEY C ROJAS
D390782 JANNA K BRADLEY
D390784 BRANDI M HART
D390786 JANY H LEE
D390788 STEPHANIE E RICHARDS
D390790 LAURA J STOVER
D390792 KATRENA J SCHULZE
D390794 ANTHONY VALENZUELA
D390796 STEVEN F ANDREWS
D390798 VERNAL ESPINOZA
D390800 ERNIE E HINGCO
D390802 RACHOT MORAGRAAN
D390804 ANAND V RAO
D390806 TERREL KEITH WINSTON
D390808 O.C.E.A.
D390810 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITI
D390B12 SO CAL CREDIT UNION
W2866 GREAT WEST LIFE 457 #340
W2868 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
**** PAGE TOTAL = 764023.67
TOTAL CHECK PAYMENTS
TOTAL DIRECT DEPOSITS
TOTAL WIRE PAYMENTS
GRAND TOTAL PAYMENTS
17 595
4 616
3429.42 D390779
2068.00 D390781
231.7. 72 D390783
623.21 D390785
5343.06 D3907B7
1.903.60 D390789
11774.80 D390791
2474.51 D390793
1620.94 D390795
2511.87 D390797
2127.80 D3.90799
2209.38 D390801
3983.87 D390803
5929.81 D390805
3163.08 D390807
1101.61 D390809
45.00 D390811
44466.00 D390813
109387.93 W2867
368897.34 W2869
FLOR DE LIS ELIZONDO
ASHLEIGH R ANDERSON CAMB
MARY C CERDA
LIANE Y KWAN
SHERRILL A MEAD
CAITLYN M STEPHENSON
ANNAL GOLD
MATTHEW T SWANSON
CANDY G WILDER
TERENCE S CHANG
CESAR GALLO
GEOFFREY A KLOESS
NOEL J PROFFITT
ROD T VICTORIA
O.C.E.A. GENERAL
POLICE ASSN
GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSO
SOUTHLAND CREDIT UNION
GREAT WEST LIFE OBRA#340
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT D
2669.91
2040.53
2108.27
348G.82
2426.90
2555.69
2038.39
1800.90
2078.18
4912.67
2889.67
3757.84
4680.00
2414.64
2321.88
16264.79
3445.00
4775.00
2698.07
119279.57
20,004.66
1,687,303.31
600,262.91
"'iJJ ........... . y 2,307,570.88
Checks #184800 thru #184816, and Direct Deposits #D390219 thru #D390813, and wire #W2866 thru #W2869 presented in the Payroll Register submitted to the Garden Grove City Council 11 JAN 2022, have been audited for accuracy and funds are available for payment thereof. ~4-~J -. ~~E DIRECTOR
Agenda Item - 2.f.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Maria Stipe
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: City Manager
Subject: Approval to place a
Strawberry Zest statue in
front of Fire Station 84 on
Valley View Street upon
completion of private fund
raising efforts. ( Action Item)
Date: 1/11/2022
OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to approve placement of a Strawberry Zest statue in front of Fire Station 84 on Valley View Street upon completion of private fundraising efforts.
BACKGROUND
At the December 14, 2021, City Council Meeting, Council Member George Brietigam proposed placing a Strawberry Zest statue in front of Fire Station 84 on Valley View Street as part of a branding component for the West Garden Grove Business District and City overall.
Local artist Jennifer Stewart designed the concept, which will consist of a strawberry emerging from the peel of an orange, symbolizing the agricultural heritage of the area, when Orange County really was “orange” county and when Garden Grove’s leading crop was the strawberry. The public art piece will be approximately six feet tall and will serve as a focal point for the community as well as celebrate the City and the County’s heritage (see attached concept photo).
DISCUSSION
At the December 14, 2021, City Council Meeting, the City Council voted to agendize for formal action placement of the Strawberry Zest statue in front of Fire Station 84 on Valley View Street upon completion of private fund raising efforts.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no cost to the City as the statue will be paid for with private funds.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
Approve placement of a Strawberry Zest statue in front of Fire Station 84 on Valley View Street upon completion of private fundraising efforts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type File Name
Photo 1/10/2022 Backup Material DOC-20220110-
11_55_05.pdf
•
Agenda Item - 3.a.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Lisa Kim
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community and Economic
Development Department
Subject: Introduction and first reading
of an Ordinance to approve
Amendment No. A-033-2021
Date: 1/11/2022
OBJECTIVE
To transmit a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the City Council to introduce and conduct the first reading of an Ordinance approving Amendment No. A-033-2021 regarding a City-initiated text amendment to Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code to implement the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7, added by Senate Bill 9, by adding regulations and development standards for two-unit housing developments and parcel maps for urban lot splits in single-family residential zones.
BACKGROUND
On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 9 into law.
Effective January 1, 2022, SB 9 adds Sections 66585.21 and 66411.7 to the Government Code. Section 65852.21 requires cities to consider a proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single-family residential zone ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements. Section 66411.7 requires local agencies to ministerially approve a parcel map for an “urban lot split” that meets certain requirements. Both statutes permit the City to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on such projects as long as those standards would not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units on a lot or physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area. The proposed text amendment would establish objective development standards for proposed SB 9 two-unit residential developments and urban lot splits and establish procedures for ministerial review consistent with these new State laws.
On December 2, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 6035-21 recommending City Council approval of a City-initiated text amendment to Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code to implement the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7, added by Senate Bill 9, by adding regulations and development standards for two-unit housing developments and parcel maps for urban lot splits in single-family residential zones. The
Resolution was passed with a 5-0 vote, with two Planning Commissioners being absent. No member of the public spoke about the item.
DISCUSSION
Summary of SB 9
To qualify for ministerial approval under SB 9, a two-unit development or urban lot split must satisfy specified criteria. These qualifying criteria include, but are not limited to the following:
The property must be located within a single-family residential zone.
The proposed development cannot be located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city landmark or historic property pursuant to a city ordinance.
The development site cannot be prime farmland, wetlands, a site identified for conservation or habitat preservation, or a regulatory floodway and the development must meet specified standards if it is located in high or very high fire hazard severity zone, the flood zone, or within an earthquake fault zone.
The proposed development cannot require the demolition or alteration of housing that has been occupied by a tenant within the last 3 years.
The proposed development cannot require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very-low income.
The proposed development cannot require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control.
An owner of the property cannot have removed residential units on the property from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the last 15 years.
If the site has been occupied by a tenant within the last 3 years, the proposed development cannot allow for the demolition of more than 25% of the existing exterior structural walls (unless allowed by local ordinance).
In addition, in the case of an urban lot split:
The parcel map must subdivide an existing lot to create no more than two new lots of approximately equal lot area, provided that one lot shall not be smaller than 40% of the lot area of the original lot;
Unless the city otherwise allows, both newly created lots must be no smaller than 1,200 square feet;
The lot proposed to be subdivided must not have been established through a prior urban lot split;
The subject lot cannot be adjacent to any lot that was established through an urban lot split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot; and
Except as otherwise provided in SB 9, the proposed subdivision must comply with all objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
In limited circumstances, a city may deny an application for an SB 9 two-unit development or urban lot split where the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact upon health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
SB 9 permits cities to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on two- unit housing developments and urban lot splits, subject to the following caveats:
The city’s objective standards cannot conflict with any of SB 9’s provisions.
The city cannot impose any objective standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units per lot or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet.
The city cannot require a setback for an existing structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure (but may otherwise require at least 4-foot side and rear setbacks in all circumstances).
The city cannot require off-street parking of more than one space per unit.
The city cannot impose any parking requirements where the subject lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of a high-quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or if there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the lot.
The city cannot reject an application for an SB 9 two-unit development or urban lot split solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures, provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
The city cannot require the construction of offsite improvements or right-of-way dedications in conjunction with approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split.
The city cannot require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions as a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map application for the creation of an urban lot split.
SB 9 also contains the following provisions:
Cities are not required to permit an ADU or JADU on a lot that utilizes both the urban lot split and the two-unit development provisions of SB 9.
Cities may require easements for the provision of public services and facilities in conjunction with a parcel map for an urban lot split.
Cities may require that the two lots resulting from an urban lot split have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way.
Cities must require that rental of a unit created under SB 9 be for a term longer than 30 days.
Cities must require that the uses allowed on a lot created through an urban lot split be limited to residential uses.
Cities must require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of approval of the urban lot split (but cities may not impose any other owner occupancy standards on an urban lot split).
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SB 9 expressly authorizes cities to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions and provides that such ordinances are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).
Proposed Land Use Code Amendments
In order to implement SB 9, Staff is proposing that a new Chapter 9.56 be added to the Land Use Code. This new Chapter would establish objective development standards and application and ministerial review procedures for proposed SB 9 two-unit residential developments and urban lot splits.
Staff is also proposing adding a new section to the City’s existing subdivision ordinance (Section 9.40.250) to specifically address parcel maps for urban lot splits. Consistent with the Subdivision Map Act, the City’s current subdivision regulations contemplate and require a discretionary review process for parcel maps, pursuant to which all tentative parcel maps require Planning Commission approval. Since parcel maps for urban lot splits must be approved ministerially, and the city will not have the ability to impose discretionary conditions of approval, new procedures for these unique new types of subdivision maps must be adopted.
In addition to the requirements, qualifications, and limitations expressly required by SB 9, these proposed new Code provisions contain objective design and development standards to ensure that new residential units and lots developed pursuant to SB 9 are attractive, and compatible with the existing development and, to the extent allowed by law, do not substantially alter the residential character of the neighborhoods in which they are located.
The proposed regulations include standards specifically addressing multiple matters, including the following:
Unit Size (minimum 500 sq. ft. / maximum 800 sq. ft.)
Height/Stories (limited to one story and a maximum of 17 feet) Setbacks
Building Separation
Maximum Lot Coverage
Maximum Front Setback Hardscape Coverage Limit
Minimum Required Open Space/Recreation Areas
Landscaping
Perimeter Block Walls
Minimum Unit Design Standards
Minimum Storage Space within Units
Required Laundry Facilities and Water Heaters for each Unit Screening of Mechanical Equipment
Requirements for Driveways, Access, and Circulation
Requirements that new lots adjoin the public right-of-way and have 25 feet of street frontage
Refuse Storage Areas
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Drainage and Stormwater Management
Address Identification
Utilities
Where a specific development standard is not addressed, the standards for the underlying zone will apply.
SB 9 requires that the City’s development standards must yield if necessary to allow the development of two 800 square foot units on a lot. To address application of this exception, the proposed regulations prioritize certain development standards above others so that standards perceived to be of higher priority to the City may only be waived if the waiver of lower priority development standards is insufficient to facilitate development of two 800 square foot units.
The proposed regulations also include provisions:
limiting lots created by urban lot splits to having two housing units of any kind (i.e., any combination of primary units, ADUs, or JADUs);
limiting separate conveyance of units on the same lot;
Prohibiting condominium airspace divisions and common interest developments; limiting applicants to natural persons;
establishing application procedures and requirements, including requirements pertaining to verification that the subject property has not been occupied by tenants within the last 3 years;
requiring compliance with OCFA’s emergency access and service requirements; clarifying that SB 9 projects are subject to development impact fees; requiring recordation of a deed restriction containing specified provisions; specifying that SB 9 projects are subject to the replacement housing obligations imposed by the Housing Crisis Act;
providing that approval of an SB 9 development expires if not acted on within one year;
authorizing the Director of Economic and Community Development to promulgate standard conditions to implement the regulations; and
authorizing the City Engineer to interpret and establish guidance and procedures for the processing, approving, and finalizing parcel maps for urban lot splits.
The complete proposed text amendments are set forth in the attached proposed City Council Ordinance that is included with this Report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial Impact regarding this proposal.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
Conduct a Public Hearing;
Introduce and conduct the first reading of an Ordinance approving Amendment No. A-
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
•
033-2021 regarding a City-initiated text amendment to Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code to implement the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7, added by Senate Bill 9, by adding regulations and development standards for two- unit housing developments and parcel maps for urban lot splits in single-family residential zones.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type File Name
A-033-2021 Draft
Ordinance 12/13/2021 Ordinance A-033-2021_Draft_Ordinance.docx Plannng Commission
Staff Report,
Resolution, Minute
Excerpt from December
2, 2021
12/13/2021 Backup Material A-033-
2021_PC_SR_Reso_Minute_Excerpt.pdf
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. A-033-2021, A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT TO TITLE 9 OF THE
GARDEN GROVE MUNICPAL CODE TO ADOPT NEW REGULATIONS FOR TWO -UNIT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND PARCEL MAPS FOR URBAN LOT SPLITS IN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9.
City Attorney Summary
This Ordinance approves an amendment to Title 9 of the City of Garden Grove Municipal Code to implement the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 , added by Senate Bill (SB) 9, by adding regulations and objective development standards for two -unit housing developments and parcel ma ps for urban lot splits. The amendment also adds Section 9.40.250 Urban Lot Splits to Chapter 9.40 ( Subdivisions) of Title 9 that addresses the processing of urban lot splits.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The proposed Code Amendment is a text amendment intended to implement recent changes in State law requiring ministerial approval of proposed parcel maps for urban lots splits and certain proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units in single-family residential zones.;
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2022, Senate Bill (SB) 9 adds Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to the Government Code. Section 65852.21 to the Government Code requires local agencies to consider a proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single -family residential zone ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements. Section 66411.7 requires local agencies to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets certain requirements. Both statutes permit the City to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on such projects as long as those standards would not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units on a lot or physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area. The proposed text amendment would establish objective development standards for proposed SB 9 two -unit residential developments and urban lot splits and establish procedures for ministerial review consistent with these new State laws;
WHEREAS, Amendment No. A -033-2021 was initiated by the City of Garden Grove and is a Code Amendment to add Chapter 9.56 and Section 9.40.250 to Title 9 of the Municipal Code to establish regulations and objective development standards for SB 9 Two -Unit Residential Development and Parcel Maps for Urban Lot Splits pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 9;
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
WHEREAS, following a Public Hearing held on December 2, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 6035-21 recommending approval of Amendment No. A-032-2021;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a legal notice, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed adoption of this Ordinance was held by the City Council on January 11, 2022, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard;
WHEREAS, the City Council gave due and careful consideration to the matter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby incorporates by reference the findings and reasons set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6035-21, and makes the following findings regarding Amendment No. A-033-2021:
A. The Amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and elements of the City’s General Plan.
B. The Amendment will promote the public interest, health, safety and welfare.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed Code Amendment is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to new Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The facts and reasons stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6053-21 recommending approval of Amendment No. A-033-2021, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, are hereby incorporated herein by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full.
SECTION 3: Add new Chapter 9.56 to Title 9 (land Use) of the City of Garden Grove’s Municipal Code as follow:
CHAPTER 9.56 SB 9 TWO-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND
URBAN LOT SPLITS
9.56.010 Purpose, Applicability, Definitions, Interpretation.
A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to appropriately regulate qualifying SB 9 two-unit residential developments and urban lot splits within single- family residential zones in accordance with California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
B. Applicability. The standards and limitations set forth in this chapter shall apply to urban lot splits and the development and use of SB 9 two-unit residential developments within a single-family residential zone in the City, notwithstanding any other conflicting provisions of this code. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this chapter and any other provision of this code, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail.
C. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1. The terms ADU and JADU shall have the meanings ascribed to these terms in chapter 9.54.
2. The term “Director” means the City of Garden Grove Director of Community and Economic Development, or his or her designee.
3. The term “individual property owner” means a natural person holding fee title individually or jointly in the person’s own name or a beneficiary of a trust that holds fee title. “Individual property owner” does not include any corporation or corporate person of any kind (partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, C corporation, S corporation, etc.) except for a community land trust (as defined by Revenue and Taxation Code Section 402.1(a)(11)(C)(ii)) or a qualified nonprofit corporation (as defined by Revenue and Taxation Code Section 214.15).
4. The term “new primary dwelling unit” means either a new, additional dwelling unit that is created or an existing dwelling unit that is expanded, but does not include an ADU or a JADU.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
5. The term “single-family residential zone” shall have the same meaning as in California Government Code Section 65852.21. A single-family residential zone includes the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district and any property within a planned unit development district or a specific plan area where a single-family dwelling is a permitted use, but a duplex, triplex, or multiple-family dwelling is not a permitted or conditionally permitted use.
6. The term “SB 9 two-unit residential development” shall mean a housing development containing no more than two primary residential units within a single-family residential zone that qualifies for ministerial review pursuant to California Government Code Section 65852.21 and this chapter. A housing development contains two residential units if the development proposes no more than two new units or if it proposes to add one new unit to one existing primary unit.
7. The term “urban lot split” shall have the same meaning as stated in California Government Code Section 66411.7.
D. Interpretation. The provisions of this chapter shall be interpreted to be consistent with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 and shall be applied in a manner consistent with state law. The city shall not apply any requirement or development standard provided for in this chapter to the extent prohibited by any provision of state law.
9.56.020 Permit Application and Review Procedures
A. Application. An applicant for an SB 9 two-unit residential development or an urban lot split shall submit an application on a form prepared by the city, along with all information and materials prescribed by such form. No application shall be accepted unless it is completed as prescribed and is accompanied by payment for all applicable fees.
B. Review. Consistent with state law, the Director will consider and approve or disapprove a complete application for an SB 9 two-unit residential development or an urban lot split ministerially, without discretionary review or public hearing.
C. Nonconforming Conditions. An SB 9 two-unit residential development may only be approved if all nonconforming zoning conditions are corrected. The correction of legal nonconforming zoning conditions is not a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
D. Effectiveness of Approval. The ministerial approval of an SB 9 two-unit residential development or a parcel map for an urban lot split does not take effect until the city has confirmed that all required documents have been recorded.
E. Hold Harmless. Approval of an SB 9 two-unit residential development or a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be conditioned on the applicant agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city, its officers, agents, employees and/or consultants from all claims and damages (including attorney’s fees) related to the approval and its subject matter.
F. Specific, Adverse Impacts. Notwithstanding anything else in this section, the Director may deny an application for an SB 9 two-unit residential development or a parcel map for an urban lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, on either public health and safety or on the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.
9.56.030 Qualifying Requirements.
A proposed urban lot split or SB 9 two-unit residential development must meet all of the following requirements in order to qualify for ministerial review pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director that each of these requirements is satisfied. The applicant and each owner of the property shall provide a sworn statement, in a form approved by the Director, attesting to all facts necessary to establish that each requirement is met. The city may conduct its own inquires and investigation to ascertain the veracity of the sworn statements, including, but not limited to, interviewing prior owners and occupants of the subject property, interviewing owners and occupants of nearby properties, and reviewing tax records, and may require additional evidence necessary to support the sworn statements, as determined by the Director in his or her reasonable discretion.
A. The subject property shall be located within a single-family residential zone.
B. The proposed development shall not be located on any site identified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of California Government Code Section 65913.4, unless the development satisfies the requirements specified therein. Such sites include, but are not limited to, prime farmland, wetlands, high or very high fire hazard severity zones, special flood hazard areas, regulatory floodways, and lands identified for conservation or habitat preservation as specifically defined in Government Code Section 65913.4.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
C. The proposed development shall not be located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the California Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city landmark or historic property pursuant to a city ordinance.
D. The proposed development shall not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
E. The proposed development shall not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control.
F. The proposed development shall not require the demolition or alteration of housing that has been occupied by a tenant within the last three (3) years.
G. If any existing or previously demolished housing unit on the lot has been occupied by a tenant in the last three (3) years, the proposed development shall not involve the demolition of more than 25 percent of the existing exterior structural walls of any housing unit on the lot.
H. The subject property shall be owned solely by one or more individual property owners.
I. In the case of an urban lot split, the lot proposed to be subdivided shall not have been established through a prior urban lot split.
J. In the case of an urban lot split, the lot proposed to be subdivided (“subject lot”) is not adjacent to any lot that was established through an urban lot split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot.
K. No unpermitted construction or illegal nonconforming zoning conditions shall exist on the property.
9.56.040 Permitted Locations
A lot on which an urban lot split or SB 9 two-unit residential development is proposed must be located within a single-family residential zone. A lot located within a multiple-family or mixed-use zone shall not be eligible to be subdivided through an urban lot split or developed with an SB 9 two-unit residential development pursuant to this chapter.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
9.56.050 Number of Dwelling Units Permitted on a Lot
A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this code, state law requires the city to permit a lot located within a single-family residential zone to contain two primary dwelling units, provided both units are developed and maintained in compliance with the standards and requirements set forth in this chapter.
B. Provided the lot is not subdivided or created through an urban lot split, development of two primary dwelling units on a lot through an SB 9 two-unit residential development in conformance with this chapter does not preclude the development or maintenance of one or more ADUs and/or JADUs on the lot to the extent permitted by chapter 9.54 and state law.
C. No more than two (2) dwelling units of any kind may be constructed or maintained on a lot that results from an urban lot split. For purposes of this subdivision, the two-unit limitation applies to any combination of primary dwelling units, ADUs, and JADUs.
9.56.060 Separate Conveyance
A. Primary dwelling units located on the same lot may not be owned or conveyed separately from one another. All fee interest in a lot and all dwellings must be held equally and undivided by all individual owners of the lot.
B. Separate conveyance of the two lots resulting from an urban lot split is permitted. If dwellings or other structures (such as garages) on different lots are adjacent or attached to each other, the urban lot split boundary may separate them for conveyance purposes if the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. If any attached structures span or will span the new lot line, or if the two lots share a driveway pursuant to subsection 9.56.060(Q)(2), appropriate covenants, easements or similar documentation allocating legal and financial rights and responsibilities between the owners of the two lots (“CC&Rs”) for construction, reconstruction, use, maintenance, and improvement of the attached structures and any related shared drive aisles, parking areas, or other portions of the lot must be recorded before the city will approve a final parcel map for the urban lot split. Notwithstanding the provision of such CC&Rs, however, where attached structures and/or related shared facilities span a lot line resulting from an urban lot split, all owners of both lots shall be jointly and severally responsible for the use and maintenance of such structures and/or shared facilities in compliance with all provisions of this Code.
C. Condominium airspace divisions and common interest developments are not permitted on a lot created through an urban lot split or containing an SB 9 two-unit residential development.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
9.56.070 Residential Use Only
No non-residential use is permitted on any lot created through an urban lot split or containing an SB 9 two-unit residential development.
9.56.080 No Short-Term Rentals Permitted
The rental of any dwelling unit on a lot created through an urban lot split or containing an SB 9 two-unit residential development shall be for a term longer than 30 consecutive days.
9.56.090 Housing Crisis Act Replacement Housing Obligations.
If the proposed development will result in the demolition of protected housing, as defined in California Government Code Section 66300, the applicant shall replace each demolished protected unit and comply with all applicable requirements imposed pursuant to subsection (d) of Government Code Section 66300.
9.56.100 Development Standards and Design Criteria
A. Development Standards. A qualifying SB 9 two-unit residential development and any development on a lot created through an urban lot split shall be subject to the standards and criteria set forth in this section. In addition, except as modified or provided by this section or state law, an SB 9 two-unit residential development and any development on a lot created through an urban lot split shall conform to all objective development standards applicable to the lot as set forth in this title and/or in an applicable specific plan or planned unit development ordinance or resolution, along with all applicable objective standards and criteria contained in standard plans and specifications, policies, and/or standard conditions duly promulgated and/or adopted by the city, the Garden Grove Sanitary District, and the Orange County Fire Authority.
B. Unit Size.
1. Minimum Size. Each new primary dwelling unit shall be at least the following minimum sizes based on the number of sleeping rooms provided:
a. Studio / One bedroom: 500 square feet.
b. More than one bedroom: 700 square feet.
2. Maximum Size.
a. The total floor area of each new primary dwelling unit developed as part of an SB 9 two-unit residential development or on a lot
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
created through an urban lot split shall not exceed 800 square feet.
b. A primary dwelling that was legally established on the lot prior to the submittal of a complete application for an SB 9 two-unit development or an urban lot split and has a total floor area of 800 square feet shall be limited to its current lawful floor area and may not be expanded.
c. A primary dwelling that was legally established prior to the submittal of a complete application for an urban lot split or an SB 9 two-unit residential development and that is smaller than 800 square feet may be expanded to 800 square feet.
C. Unit Height; Stories. Each new primary dwelling unit shall be one story, constructed at ground level, and should not be more than 17 feet in height measured from ground level to the highest point on the roof.
D. Setbacks.
1. New Primary Dwelling Units. The following minimum setbacks from the property lines shall be observed for each new primary dwelling unit and any garages and accessory structures that are attached to a new primary dwelling unit. Detached garages and accessory structures shall comply with the setbacks contained in subsection 2. The required setbacks shall be maintained open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky, except for the permitted intrusions.
a. Front Setback: 20 feet
b. Interior Side Setback: 5 feet
c. Street Side Setback: 10 feet
d. Rear Setback: 15 feet.
2. Detached Garages and Accessory Structures. The following minimum setbacks from the property lines shall be observed for detached garages and accessory structures on a lot.
a. Front Setback: 20 feet
b. Interior Side Setback: 5 feet
c. Street Side Setback: 10 feet
d. Rear Setback: 5 feet.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
3. Any construction occurring on a lot that abuts a street that has not been fully improved shall observe all building setbacks from the ultimate right-of-way of the street.
4. Exceptions. The above minimum setback requirements do not apply or shall be modified in the following circumstances
a. No increased setback is required for an existing legally established structure or for a new primary dwelling unit that is constructed in the same dimensions as an existing legally established structure, provided that the new primary dwelling unit shall not be greater than 800 square feet.
b. A required minimum setback may be reduced pursuant to subsection W of this section to the degree it would (i) physically preclude the development or maintenance of two dwelling units on a lot or (ii) physically preclude any new primary dwelling unit from being 800 square feet in floor area; but in no event may any structure be less than four feet from a side or rear property line.
c. Permitted Intrusions. The following permitted intrusion may project into any required setback a maximum of two feet:
cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, planter boxes, masonry planters, guard railings, chimneys, and architectural projections with no floor area, including, but not limited to, windows and pilasters.
E. Building Separation. Except as otherwise allowed by state law, a minimum building separation of six (6) feet shall be maintained between all detached structures on a lot, including all residential units, garages, and accessory structures.
F. Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 50%. The lot coverage shall include all buildings and structures (primary and accessory), covered porches and patios, and covered parking areas.
G. Maximum Front Setback Coverage. No more than 50% of the front setback area may contain hardscape, excluding the allowed standard driveway in the front yard.
H. Open Space. Each new primary dwelling unit shall provide, at a minimum, a continuous private recreation area of 225 square feet with minimum interior dimensions of 10 feet. The private recreation area shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky. The private recreation area may be located within the interior side, street side, or rear setback areas.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
I. Landscaping. All setback areas, and all areas not designated for walkways, parking, drive aisles, and private recreation areas, shall be fully landscaped and irrigated. Each development shall comply with the landscaping and irrigation requirements contained in Chapter 9.08 of Title 9.
J. Perimeter Block Walls. Each development shall provide a masonry perimeter wall with a minimum height of six feet, as measured from the highest point of the finished grade next to the wall, and shall comply with the following stipulations:
1. All perimeter walls shall comply with the requirements as contained in Section 9.08.040.110, Wall, Fences and Hedges.
2. New walls shall not exceed a height of seven feet as measured from the finished point of grade next to the wall. At no time shall the overall height of the wall, as measured from adjacent neighbor’s finished grade, exceed eight feet in height.
3. Walls located within the front yard areas, or adjacent to driveways shall not exceed 36 inches in height.
4. Perimeter walls located along any side street shall maintain a minimum setback of three feet from the property line for landscaping purposes.
5. All walls shall be designed to ensure proper vision clearance for cars entering or leaving the driveway and parking areas. No wall or fence shall cause an exceedance of the applicable site distance standards set forth in City of Garden Grove Traffic Engineering Policy TE 13 or in any revised or updated standard or policy promulgated by the city.
6. The property owner shall work with the adjoining property owners in designing and constructing the perimeter block walls to avoid the use of double walls. If the property owner cannot obtain approval from the adjoining property owners, the property owner shall construct the new wall with a decorative cap to be placed between the new and the existing wall.
7. Street facing perimeter block walls shall be decorative and utilize stucco finish, slump stone or split-face block and shall include trailing vines and other landscaping to deter graffiti.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
K. Off-Street Parking.
1. Required Parking. One off-street parking space must be provided for each new primary dwelling unit unless one of the following applies:
a. The lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of either (i) a high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the California Public Resources Code, or (ii) a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the California Public Resources Code.
b. The lot is located within one block of a car-share vehicle location.
2. Off-street parking spaces for an existing primary dwelling shall continue to be provided in accordance with the standards for the underlying zone.
3. Required parking for new primary dwelling units may be provided within an enclosed garage or as open spaces on the lot, but not as tandem parking. Open spaces may be located within the side or rear setbacks, and in the front setback for driveways that are not shared by more than one housing unit.
4. All required parking spaces provided shall be a minimum of 9 feet wide and 19 feet in depth and shall comply with the size requirements for full size stalls set forth in Standard B-311 of the Standard Plans and Specifications adopted by the city. Parking spaces adjacent and parallel to walls shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide.
5. Any proposed enclosed garage shall meet the following standards:
a. Each enclosed garage shall maintain the following minimum interior parking clearance based on the number of cars it is designed to hold. No storage cabinets or mechanical equipment, including, but not limited to water heaters, utility sinks, or washers and dryers, shall encroach into the required parking area.
Number of
Cars
Minimum Interior Parking
Area
1 10 feet x 20 feet
2 20 feet by 20 feet
b. The garage shall be equipped with an automatic roll-up garage door opener.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
c. Each garage shall maintain the ability to park the required number of vehicles at all times.
L. Unit Design Standards.
1. If there is an existing primary dwelling that was legally established on the lot prior to the filing of a complete application for a two-unit development or an urban lot split, any new additional primary dwelling unit must match the existing primary dwelling unit in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof pitch. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof.
2. If two new primary dwelling units are developed on the lot, the dwellings must match each other in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof pitch. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof.
3. All exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights.
4. Each new primary dwelling unit shall have a main entry that is clearly defined, and to the extent possible, be oriented directly toward the street(s) in order to provide consistency with the neighborhood. The main entry shall be covered, with a minimum depth of three feet.
Each covered entry shall be in proportion with the building and shall incorporate architectural features that are used in the overall building design. All doors shall have standard door locks and dead bolts.
M. Storage Facilities. Each new primary dwelling unit shall provide a minimum 144 cubic feet of private secure storage space. Normal closets and cupboard space located within the unit shall not count toward meeting the requirement.
N. Laundry Facilities. Each new primary dwelling unit shall have a laundry space located within the unit or within a garage accessible from the unit that is equipped with washer and dryer hook-ups. If the laundry facilities are located within an enclosed garage, the laundry equipment shall not encroach into the interior garage parking area.
O. Water Heaters. Each new primary dwelling unit shall have a separate hot water. The location of the water heater shall be incorporated into the design of each unit. No exterior water heater enclosures shall be permitted. Water heaters may be substituted with tankless water heaters provided all building codes are complied with.
P. Mechanical Equipment, Metering Devices. All roof and ground mounted mechanical equipment and metering devices shall be completely screened from view from either on or off the property. All ground mounted equipment and above-ground utility meters, including, but not limited to, heating, cooling, or ventilating equipment, water meters, gas meters, and irrigation
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
equipment, shall be shown on the site plan, and, to the extent possible, be placed outside of the required front setback area. If mechanical equipment or metering devices are to be located between a structure and the property line, an unobstructed path at least three feet wide shall be provided between the equipment and the property line.
Q. Access and Circulation.
1. Each development shall be designed to provide adequate on-site vehicular access, circulation, back-up, and turn-around areas that comply with all the applicable city standards.
2. Where the street frontage of a lot (or the combined street frontage of the two lots created through an urban lot split) is less than 81 feet, all units on the lot (or all units on both lots created through an urban lot split) shall share the same drive approach and driveway.
3. Driveways shall maintain a minimum width of 20 feet, unless a wider width is required for emergency access.
4. Adequate access to each residential unit on the lot for fire and emergency medical service personnel and vehicles must be provided.
The Orange County Fire Authority must confirm that all applicable fire and emergency access requirements are met before the city will approve an application.
R. Refuse Storage Areas. All developments shall provide each unit with the appropriate number of containers for recyclables, organics, and non- recyclable solid waste (“trash containers”) as required by the Garden Grove Sanitary District, and shall comply with the following:
1. Trash containers shall be stored within designated storage areas only and not within the garage parking area.
2. The placement of trash containers for pick-up, and the duration of time prior to and after trash collection of those trash containers, is subject to the Garden Grove Sanitary District requirements.
3. The area required for each container shall be a minimum of 38 inches by 38 inches.
4. The trash areas shall be paved and accessed by gates and a walkway for ease of taking trash containers to and from the street.
S. Utilities.
1. Each primary dwelling unit on a lot must have its own direct utility connection to the utility / public service provider.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
2. All necessary and/or required easements for the provision of electricity, gas, water, sewer, and other utility or public service to the lot and each primary dwelling unit must be obtained by the property owner / applicant. The city may condition approval of an application under this section upon the applicant providing evidence that such easements have been agreed to and/or recorded.
3. Submitted plans shall show the location and dimension of all proposed above-ground and underground utility and public service facilities serving the lot and each dwelling unit and the location and dimensions of all related easements.
T. Building and Safety. All structures built on the lot must comply with all current local building standards.
U. Drainage and Stormwater Management. Each lot shall drain to the street or to an approved storm drain facility. The design of parkway culverts and storm drain lateral pipe connections to city-maintained storm drains within the city right-of-way shall comply with applicable city standards. SB 9 two- unit residential developments and the development of lots created through an urban lot split are subject to Chapter 6.40 of this code (“Stormwater Quality”) and must comply with all applicable related rules, requirements, and standards, including, but not limited to, the preparation and implementation of a water quality management plan that meets applicable requirements.
V. Address Identification. Each residential unit shall have a separate address and shall be provided with approved address identification that is visible from the street fronting the lot in accordance with Section R319 of the California Residential Code. Where the unit address on the building cannot be viewed from the street fronting the lot, a monument, pole, or other means consistent with city standards shall be used to identify the unit. Where required by the fire code official, address identification shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response.
W. Exceptions to Objective Standards.
1. Any objective zoning, subdivision, or design standard that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two primary residential units on a lot or that would physically preclude each new unit from being 800 square feet in floor area shall be modified or waived to the extent necessary to allow the development of two primary residential units on a lot pursuant to this chapter that are each 800 square feet in floor area. The city prioritizes some objective development standards over others, as provided in subsection 2, below. In applying the exceptions required by this subsection, a proposed project shall be designed such that a
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
development standard given a lower priority is modified or waived before a development standard given a higher priority. If a proposed project can be designed such that each lot can accommodate two 800 square foot primary dwelling units by modifying or waiving a development standard with a lower priority, then an application that proposes a design requiring the modification or waiver of a development standard with a higher priority will be denied.
2. Priority of Development Standards. The city prioritizes the following development standards in the following descending order of priority, with the first development standard listed having the highest priority:
a. Height; Stories.
b. Front setback.
c. Maximum front setback hardscape coverage (50%).
d. Open space (225 square feet).
e. Minimum unit size.
f. Side or rear setback (a minimum of 4 feet must be maintained).
g. Lot coverage (50%).
h. Building separation (minimum separation required by Building Code must be maintained).
3. This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit the construction of new garages or accessory structures, or the maintenance of existing accessory structures not providing required parking, where the development or maintenance of two 800 square foot dwelling units on the lot would not be physically precluded in the absence of such proposed or existing structures.
4. Building standards, standards required by federal, state or local law or for sanitation or safety reasons, the off-site parking requirements in subsection K of this section, and the lot size, access, and frontage requirements set forth in Section 9.56.110 will not be waived or modified unless otherwise required by state law.
5. As part of its application, the applicant shall provide a written explanation that (a) specifically describes every development standard the applicant seeks to modify and waive, and to what extent, (b) demonstrates why waiver or modification of each development standard is needed to prevent physically precluding the construction of up to two primary residential units on the lot and/or each new unit
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, and (c) demonstrates that the requested modifications and/or waivers are consistent with the priority set forth in this subsection.
9.56.110 Additional Requirements for Urban Lot Splits
A. An urban lot split must conform to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, including implementing requirements in this code, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no dedication of rights-of-way or construction of offsite improvements is required solely for an urban lot split.
B. Lot Size. The parcel map for an urban lot split must subdivide an existing lot to create no more than two new lots of approximately equal lot area, provided that one lot shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original lot proposed for subdivision. Both newly created lots must each be no smaller than 1,200 square feet.
C. Easements.
1. The owner must enter into an easement agreement with each utility/public-service provider to establish easements that are sufficient for the provision of public services and facilities to each of the resulting lots.
2. Each easement must be shown on the tentative parcel map and the final parcel map.
3. Copies of the unrecorded easement agreements must be submitted with the application. The easement agreements must be recorded against the property before the final parcel map may be approved.
D. Lot Access.
1. Each resulting lot must adjoin the public right-of-way.
2. Each resulting lot must have frontage on the public right-of-way of at least 25 feet.
E. Improvements Required. Each resulting lot must be developed in accordance with improvement plans processed concurrently with the parcel map application and approved by the city, showing the location and dimensions of all structures, drive aisles, parking areas, pedestrian pathways, and other improvements proposed to be constructed or to remain on each lot.
Approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be subject to the city’s approval of such related improvement plans and all related entitlements or other approvals required by this code. Any proposed development on one of the lots that is inconsistent with or not shown on the improvement plans
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
approved concurrently with the urban lot split shall be subject to review and approval by the city in accordance with the applicable requirements of this code.
F. Required Affidavit. The applicant for a parcel map for an urban lot split must sign an affidavit provided by the city stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the dwelling units on one of the resulting lots as the applicant’s principal residence for a minimum of three years after the final parcel map for the urban lot split is approved.
9.56.120 Compliance with Emergency Access and Service Requirements
Development of a lot pursuant to this chapter must conform and comply with all applicable provisions of the fire code and applicable requirements promulgated by the Orange County Fire Authority intended to ensure sufficient emergency access is provided or maintained. Prior to submitting a complete application for an SB 9 two- unit residential development or an urban lot split, the applicant shall obtain and provide city with written confirmation from the Orange County Fire Authority that the proposed development complies with all such requirements.
9.56.130 Deed Restriction.
Prior to approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split and/or the issuance of a building permit for the development of an SB 9 two-unit residential development, the owner(s) of record of the property shall provide the Director a copy of a covenant agreement, declaration of restrictions, or similar deed restriction (“deed restriction”) recorded against the property, which is in a form prepared by and/or acceptable to the Director, and that does each of the following:
A. Expressly requires the rental of any dwelling unit on the property be for a term longer than 30 consecutive days.
B. Expressly prohibits any non-residential use of the lot.
C. Expressly prohibits primary dwelling units located on the same lot from being owned or conveyed separately from one another.
D. Expressly requires all fee interest in each lot and all dwellings to be held equally and undivided by all individual owners of the lot.
E. Expressly prohibits condominium airspace divisions and common interest developments on the property.
F. States that the property was formed and/or developed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and is therefore subject to the city regulations set forth in this chapter, including all applicable limits on dwelling size and development.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
G. Expressly prohibits more than two (2) dwelling units of any kind from being constructed or maintained on a lot that results from an urban lot split.
H. States (i) that the deed restriction is for the benefit of and is enforceable by the city, (ii) that the deed restriction shall run with the land and shall bind future owners, their heirs, and successors and assigns, (iii) that lack of compliance with the deed restriction shall be good cause for legal action against the owner(s) of the property; (iv) that, if the city is required to bring legal action to enforce the deed restriction, then the city shall be entitled to its attorneys’ fees and court costs; and (v) that the deed restriction may not be modified or terminated without the prior written consent of the Director.
9.56.140 Fees
Development of lots pursuant to this section shall be subject to all applicable fees, including development impact fees, and assessments, duly adopted by the city.
9.56.150 Objective Standard Conditions.
The Director is authorized to promulgate objective standard conditions implementing this section, which are consistent with this Code and state law, that shall apply to the application and development of two-unit developments and urban lot splits, and to publish such standard conditions on the city’s internet website.
Applicants must comply with all standard conditions duly promulgated by the Director and published on the city’s internet website.
9.56.160 Expiration of Approval.
The approval of an SB 9 two-unit residential development shall become null and void if construction is not commenced within one (1) year of the approval and diligently advanced until completion of the project. In the event construction of the project is commenced, but not diligently advanced until completion, the rights granted pursuant to the approval shall expire if the building permits for the project expire.
SECTION 4: Add new Section 9.40.250 to Chapter 9.40 (Subdivisions of Title 9 (Land Use) of the City of Garden Grove’s Municipal Code as follow:
9.40.250 Urban Lot Splits
A. The provisions of this section apply to the processing of parcel maps for urban lot splits pursuant to California Government Code section 66411.7 and chapter 9.56 of this code.
B. Approval. Notwithstanding the Subdivision Map Act or any other provision of this chapter, an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split is approved or denied ministerially, by the city’s community and economic development director, without discretionary review. A tentative parcel map for an urban
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No.
lot split is approved ministerially if it complies with the requirements of chapter 9.56 and applicable objective requirements of this chapter 9.40 and the Subdivision Map Act. The tentative parcel map may not be recorded. A final parcel map is approved ministerially as well, but not until the owner demonstrates that the required documents have been recorded, such as the deed restriction and easements.
C. Guidance and Procedures. The city engineer has the authority to interpret and establish guidance and procedures for the processing, approving, and finalizing parcel maps for urban lot splits, which are consistent with state and local law.
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the vali dity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any o ne or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, words or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinan ce and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption.
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM NO.: C.1. SITE LOCATION: Citywide
HEARING DATE: December 2, 2021 GENERAL PLAN: N/A
CASE NO.: Amendment No, A-033-2021 ZONE: N/A
APPLICANT: City of Garden Grove
OWNER: N/A CEQA DETERMINATION: Exempt
REQUEST:
A request that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of a City-initiated text amendment to Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code to implement the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7, added by Senate Bill 9, by adding regulations and development standards for two-unit housing developments and parcel maps for urban lot splits in single family residential zones.
BACKGROUND:
On September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 9 into law.
Effective January 1, 2022, SB 9 adds Sections 66585.21 and 66411. 7 to the Government Code. Section 65852.21 requires cities to consider a proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single-family residential zone ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements. Section 66411.7 requires local agencies to ministerially approve a parcel map for an "urban lot split" that meets certain requirements. Both statutes permit the City to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on such projects as long as those standards would not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units on a lot or physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area. The proposed text amendment would establish objective development standards for proposed SB 9 two-unit residential developments and urban lot splits and establish procedures for ministerial review consistent with these new State laws.
DISCUSSION:
Summary of SB 9
To qualify for ministerial approval under SB 9, a two-unit development or urban lot split must satisfy specified criteria. These qualifying criteria include, but are not limited to the following:
1642672.l
STAFF REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING PAGE 2
CASE NO. A-033-2021
• The property must be located within a single-family residential zone. • The proposed development cannot be located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city landmark or historic property pursuant to a city ordinance.
• The development site cannot be prime farmland, wetlands, a site identified for conservation or habitat preservation, or a regulatory floodway and the development must meet specified standards if it is located in high or very high fire hazard severity zone, the flood zone, or within an earthquake fault zone. • The proposed development cannot require the demolition or alteration of housing that has been occupied by a tenant within the last 3 years. • The proposed development cannot require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
• The proposed development cannot require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control. • An owner of the property cannot have removed residential units on the property from the rental market under the Ellis Act within the last 15 years. • If the site has been occupied by a tenant within the last 3 years, the proposed development cannot allow for the demolition of more than 25% of the existing exterior structural walls (unless allowed by local ordinance).
In addition, in the case of an urban lot split:
• The parcel map must subdivide an existing lot to create no more than two new lots of approximately equal lot area, provided that one lot shall not be smaller than 40% of the lot area of the original lot;
• Unless the city otherwise allows, both newly created lots must be no smaller than 1,200 square feet;
• The lot proposed to be subdivided must not have been establlshed through a prior urban lot split;
• The subject lot cannot be adjacent to any lot that was established through an urban lot split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot; and
• Except as otherwise provided in SB 9, the proposed subdivision must comply with all objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
In limited circumstances, a city may deny an application for an SB 9 two-unit development or urban lot split where the proposed project would have a specific, adverse impact upon health and safety or the physical environment and for which 1642672.1
STAFF REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING PAGE 3
CASE NO. A-033-2021
there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
SB 9 permits cities to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on two-unit housing developments and urban lot splits, subject to the followlng caveats:
• The city's objective standards cannot conflict with any of SB 9's provisions. • The city cannot impose any objective standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two units per lot or that would result ln a unit size of less than 800 square feet.
• The city cannot require a setback for an existing structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure (but may otherwise require at least 4-foot side and rear setbacks in all circumstances). • The city cannot require off-street parking of more than one space per unit. • The city cannot impose any parking requirements where the subject lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of a high-quality transit corridor or a major transit stop or if there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the lot.
• The city cannot reject an application for an SB 9 two-unit development or urban lot split solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures, provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
• The city cannot require the construction of offsite improvements or right-of way dedications in conjunction with approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split.
• The city cannot require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions as a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map application for the creation of an urban lot split.
SB 9 also contains the following provisions:
• Cities are not required to permit an ADU or JADU on a lot that utilizes both the urban lot spilt and the two-unit development provisions of SB 9. • Cities may require easements for the provision of public services and facilities in conjunction with a parcel map for an urban lot split. • Cities may require that the two lots resulting from an urban lot split have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way. • Clties must require that rental of a unit created under SB 9 be for a term longer than 30 days.
• Cities must require that the uses allowed on a lot created through an urban lot split be limited to residential uses.
1642672.\
STAFF REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING PAGE 4
CASE NO. A-033-2021
• Cities must require an applicant for an urban lot split to sign an affidavit stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of approval of the urban lot split (but cities may not impose any other owner occupancy standards on an urban lot split).
SB 9 expressly authorizes cities to adopt an ordinance to implement its provisions and provides that such ordinances are exempt from review under the California Environ mental Quality Act ("CEQA").
Proposed Land Use Code Amendments
In order to implement SB 9, Staff is proposing that a new Chapter 9.56 be added to the Land Use Code. This new Chapter would establish objective development standards and application and ministerial review procedures for proposed SB 9 two unit residential developments and urban lot splits.
Staff is also proposing adding a new section to the City's existing subdivision ordinance (Section 9.40.250) to specifically address parcel maps for urban lot splits.
Consistent with the Subdivision Map Act, the City's current subdivision regulations contemplate and require a discretionary review process for parcel maps, pursuant to which all tentative parcel maps require Planning Commission approval. Since parcel maps for urban lot splits must be approved ministerially, and the city will not have the ability to impose discretionary conditions of approval, new procedures for these unique new types of subdivision maps must be adopted.
In addition to the requirements, qualifications, and limitations expressly required by SB 9, these proposed new Code provisions contain objective design and development standards to ensure that new residential units and lots developed pursuant to SB 9 are attractive, and compatible with the existing development and, to the extent allowed by law, do not substantially alter the residential character of the neighborhoods in which they are located. The proposed regulations Include standards specifically addressing multiple matters, including the following:
• Unit Size (minimum 500 sq. ft./ maximum 800 sq. ft,)
• Height/Stories (limited to one story and a maximum of 17 feet) • Setbacks
• Building Separation
• Maximum Lot Coverage
• Maximum Front Setback Hardscape Coverage Limit
• Minimum Required Open Space/Recreation Areas
• Landscaping
• Perimeter Block Walls
1642672.1
STAFF REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING PAGE 5
CASE NO. A-033-2021
• Minimum Unit Design Standards
• Minimum Storage Space within Units
• Required Laundry Facilities and Water Heaters for each Unit • Screening of Mechani.cal Equipment
• Requirements for Driveways, Access, and Circulation
• Requirements that new lots adjoin the public right-of-way and have 25 feet of street frontage
• Refuse Storage Areas
• Drainage and Stormwater Management
• Address Identification
• Utilities
Where a specific development standard is not addressed, the standards for the underlying zone will apply.
SB 9 requires that the City's development standards must yield if necessary to allow the development of two 800 square foot units on a lot. To address application of this exception, the proposed regulations prioritize certain development standards above others so that standards perceived to be of higher priority to the City may only be waived if the waiver of lower priority development standards is i nsufficlent to facilltate development of two 800 square foot units.
The proposed regulatlons also include provisions:
• limiting lots created by urban lot splits to having two housing units of any kind (i.e., any combination of primary units, ADUs, or JADUs); • limiting separate conveyance of units on the same lot; • Prohibiting condominium airspace divisions and common Interest developments;
• limiting applicants to natural persons;
• establishing application procedures and requirements, including requirements pertaining to verification that the subject property has not been occupied by tenants within the last 3 years;
• requiring compliance with OCFA's emergency access and service requirements; • clarifying that SB 9 projects are subject to development impact fees; • requiring recordation of a deed restriction containing specified provisions; • specifying that SB 9 projects are subject to the replacement housing obligations imposed by the Housing Crisis Act;
• providing that approval of an SB 9 development expires if not acted on within one year;
• authorizing the Director of Economic and Community Development to promulgate standard conditions to implement the regulations; and 1642672.1
STAFF REPORT FOR PUBLIC HEARING
CASE NO. A-033-2021
PAGE 6
• authorizing the City Engineer to interpret and establish guidance and procedures for the processing, approving, and finalizing parcel maps for urban lot splits.
The complete proposed text amendments are set forth in Attachment "A" to the proposed Resolution included with this Report.
RECOMMEN CATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt the proposed Resolution recommending approval of Amendment No.
A-033-2021 to the City Council.
LEE MARINO
Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6035-21
Exhibit "A" Proposed Land Use Code Amendments
Senate Bill SB-9
1642672.1
RESOLUTION NO. 6035-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. A-033-2021, A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT TO mLE 9 OF THE GARDEN GROVE MUNICPAL CODE TO
ADOPT NEW REGULATIONS FOR TWO-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND
PARCEL MAPS FOR URBAN LOT SPLITS IN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SENATE BILL 9.
BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Garden Grove, in regular session assembled on December 2, 2021, does hereby recommend approval of Amendment No. A-033-2021 to the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED in the matter of Amendment No. A-033-2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Garden Grove does hereby report as follows:
1. The case was initiated by the City of Garden Grove.
2. The City of Garden Grove is proposing to add Chapter 9.56 and Section
9.40.250 to Title 9 of the Municipal Code to establish regulations and objective development standards for SB 9 Two-Unit Residential Development and Parcel Maps for Urban Lot Spllts pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 9.
3. The proposed Code Amendment is statutorily exempt from review under the Californla Envlronmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to new Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n).
4. Pursuant to legal notice, a public hearing was held on December 2, 2021, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard.
5. Report submitted by City staff was reviewed.
6. The Planning Commission gave due and careful consideration to the matter during its meeting of December 2, 2021; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED that the facts and reasons supporting the concluslon of the Planning Commission are as follows:
FACTS:
The proposed Code Amendment is a text amendment intended to implement recent changes in State law requiring ministerial review of proposed parcel maps for urban lot splits and certain proposed housing developments containing no more than two residential units in single-family residential zones.
Effective January 1, 2022, Senate Bill (SB) 9 adds Sections 66585.21 and 66411.7 to the Government Code. Section 65852.21 requires local agencies to consider a 1642675.1
Resolution No. 6035-21 Page 2
proposed housing development containing no more than two residential units within a single-family residential zone ministerially, without discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain requirements, Section 66411.7 requires local agencies to ministerially approve a parcel map for an urban lot split that meets certain requirements. Both statutes permit the City to impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards on such projects as long as those standards would not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two units on a lot or physically preclude either of the two units from being at least 800 square feet In floor area. The proposed text amendment would establish objective development standards for proposed SB 9 two-unit resldential developments and urban lot splits and establish procedures for ministerial review consistent with these new State laws.
FINDINGS AND REASONS:
1. The Amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and elements of the City's General Plan.
1642675,1
The proposed Land Use Code Amendment will implement SB 9, which is consistent with several goals and policies in the General Plan Housing Element, including (a) Policy H-3,1, which calls for the City to maintain land use policies and regulations that create capacity for development of a range of residential development types that can fulfill local housing needs; (b) Policy H-3.2, which calls for adequate sites be provided to encourage housing development that will meet the needs of all Income groups; (c) Policy H-3.7, which calls for the City to encourage infill housing development that is compatible in character with established residential neighborhoods; (d) Policy H-4.3, which calls for the City to monitor State housing-related legislation and update City plans, ordinances, and processes pursuant to such legislation; and Policy H-5.3, which calls for the City to encourage investments and the siting of new housing in an equitable and fair manner that prevents discrimination, overcomes patterns of segregation, avoids concentrations of lower-Income households, addresses pollution burdens, and fosters inclusive communities. In addition, the Housing Element update recently adopted by the City Council contemplates the development of second housing units on single-family resldential lots pursuant to SB 9 will contribute to the City's ability to meet Its Regional Housing Needs Allocation.
The proposed Amendment, which establishes objective development standards and procedures for ministerial review of SB 9 projects, is also consistent with several goals and policies in the City's General Plan Land Use Element, including (a) Policy LU-1.3, which calls for the City to support the production of housing citywide that is affordable to lower-and moderate-income households consistent with the policies and targets set forth in the Housing Element; (b) Policy LU-2.2, which calls for the City to strive to provide a diverse mix of housing types; and (c) Implementation Program LU-IMP-2B, which calls for the City to review new development with the goal of ensuring it is similar in scale to the adjoining resi9ential neighborhood to preserve Its character.
Resolution No. 6035-21 Page 3
2. The Amendment will promote the public interest, health, safety and welfare.
The proposed Land Use Code Amendment is intended to foster the development of addltional housing in the City consistent with State law and the City's Housing Element, while establishing development standards for SB 9 projects to minimize their Impacts on existing residential neighborhoods as much as possible and to help ensure that the character of the City's single-family residential neighborhoods is maintained.
INCORPORATION OF FACTS AND FINDINGS SET FORTH IN STAFF REPORT:
In addition to the foregoing, the Planning Commission incorporates herein by this reference, the facts and reasons set forth in the staff report.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does conclude:
1. Amendment No. A-033-2021 possesses characteristics that would indicate justification of the request in accordance with Municipal Code Section
9.32.030.D.1 (Code Amendment).
2. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. A-033-2021 and adopt an Ordinance making the text amendments set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Adopted this 2nd day of December 2021
ATTEST:
/s/ JUDITH MOORE
RECORDING SECRETARY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS:
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE)
/s/ JOSH LINDSAY
VICE CHAIR
I, JUDITH MOORE, Secretary of the City of Garden Grove Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Garden Grove, California, at a meeting held on December 2, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: (5) ARESTEGUI, CUNNINGHAM, LINDSAY,
RAMIREZ,SOEFFNER
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: (0) NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: (2) LEHMAN, PEREZ
1642675.J
Resolution No. 6035-21 Page 4
/s/ JUDITH MOORE
RECORDING SECRETARY
PLEASE NOTE: Any request for court review of this decision must be filed within 90 days of the date this decision was final (See Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6).
A decision becomes final if it is not timely appealed to the City Council. Appeal deadline is December 23, 2021.
1642675.l
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED LAND USE CODE AMENDMENTS
ADD NEW CHAPTER 9.56 TO TITLE 9 (LAND USE) AS FOLLOWS:
CHAPTER 9.56 SB 9 TWO-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND
URBAN LOT SPLITS
9.56.010 Purpose, Applicability, Definitions, Interpretation.
A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to appropriately regulate qualifying SB 9 two-unit residential developments and urban lot splits within single-family residential zones in accordance with Californla Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411. 7.
B. Applicability. The standards and limitations set forth in this chapter shall apply to urban lot splits and the development and use of SB 9 two-unit residential developments within a single-family residential zone in the City, notwithstanding any other conflicting provisions of this code. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this chapter and any other provision of this code, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail.
C. Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1642726.2
1. The terms ADU and JADU shall have the meanings ascribed to these terms in chapter 9.54.
2. The term "Director" means the City of Garden Grove Director of Community and Economic Development, or his or her designee.
3. The term "individual property owner" means a natural person holding fee title individually or jointly in the person's own name or a beneficiary of a trust that holds fee title. "Individual property owner" does not include any corporation or corporate person of any kind (partnership, llmited partnership, limited liability company, C corporation, S corporation, etc.) except for a community land trust (as defined by Revenue and Taxation Code Section 402.l(a)(tl)(C)(ii)) or a qualified nonprofit corporation (as defined by Revenue and Taxation Code Section 214.15).
4. The term "new primary dwelling unit" means either a new, additional dwelling unit that is created or an existing dwelling unit that is expanded, but does not include an ADU or a JADU.
1
5. The term "single-family residential zone" shall have the same meaning as in California Government Code Section 65852.21. A single-family residential zone includes the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district and any property within a planned unit development district or a specific plan area where a single-family dwelling is a permitted use, but a duplex, triplex, or multiple-family dwelling is not a permitted or conditionally permitted use.
6. The term "SB 9 two-unit residential development" shall mean a housing development containing no more than two primary residential units within a single-family residential zone that qualifies for ministerial review pursuant to Callfornia Government Code Section 65852.21 and this chapter. A housing development contains two residential units if the development proposes no more than two new units or if it proposes to add one new unit to one existing primary unit.
7. The term "urban lot split" shall have the same meaning as stated in California Government Code Section 66411.7.
D. Interpretation. The provisions of this chapter shall be interpreted to be consistent with the provisions of California Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411. 7 and shall be applied In a manner consistent with state law. The city shall not apply any requirement or development standard provided for in this chapter to the extent prohibited by any provision of state law.
9.56.020 Permit Application and Review Procedures
A. Application. An applicant for an SB 9 two-unit residential development or an urban lot split shall submit an application on a form prepared by the city, along with all information and materials prescribed by such form. No application shall be accepted unless it is completed as prescribed and is accompanied by payment for all applicable fees.
B. Review. Consistent with state law, the Director will consider and approve or disapprove a complete application for an SB 9 two-unit residential development or an urban lot split ministerially, without discretionary review or public hearing.
C. Nonconforming Conditions. An SB 9 two-unit residential development may only be approved if all nonconforming zoning conditions are corrected. The correction of legal nonconforming zoning conditions is not a condition for ministerial approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split. 2 1642726.2
D. Effectiveness of Approval. The ministerial approval of an SB 9 two-unit residential development or a parcel map for an urban lot split does not take effect until the city has confirmed that all required documents have been recorded.
E. Hold Harmless. Approval of an SB 9 two-unit residential development or a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be conditioned on the applicant agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city, its officers, agents, employees and/or consultants from all claims and damages (including attorney's fees) related to the approval and its subject matter.
F. Specific, Adverse Impacts. Notwithstanding anything else in this section, the Director may deny an application for an SB 9 two-unit residential development or a parcel map for an urban lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, on either public health and safety or on the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.
9.56.030 Qualifying Requirements.
A proposed urban lot split or SB 9 two-unit residential development must meet all of the following requirements in order to qualify for ministerial review pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director that each of these requirements is satisfied. The applicant and each owner of the property shall provide a sworn statement, in a form approved by the Director, attesting to all facts necessary to establish that each requirement is met. The city may conduct its own inquires and investigation to ascertain the veracity of the sworn statements, including, but not limited to, interviewing prior owners and occupants of the subject property, interviewing owners and occupants of nearby properties, and reviewing tax records, and may require additional evidence necessary to support the sworn statements, as determined by the Director in his or her reasonable discretion.
A. The subject property shall be located within a single-family residential zone.
B. The proposed development shall not be located on any site Identified in subparagraphs (B) to {K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of California Government Code Section 65913.4, unless the development satisfies the requirements specified therein. Such sites Include, but are not limited to, prime farmland, wetlands, high or very high fire hazard severity zones, special flood hazard areas, regulatory floodways, and lands identified for conservation or habitat preservation as specifically defined in Government Code Section 65913.4.
3 1642726.2
C. The proposed development shall not be located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the California Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city landmark or historic property pursuant to a city ordinance.
D. The proposed development shall not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
E. The proposed development shall not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control.
F. The proposed development shall not require the demolition or alteration of housing that has been occupied by a tenant within the last three (3) years.
G. If any existing or previously demolished housing unit on the lot has been occupied by a tenant in the last three (3) years, the proposed development shall not involve the demolition of more than 25 percent of the existing exterior structural walls of any housing unit on the lot.
H. The subject property shall be owned solely by one or more individual property owners.
I. In the case of an urban lot split, the lot proposed to be subdivided shall not have been established through a prior urban lot split.
J. In the case of an urban lot split, the lot proposed to be subdivided ("subject lot") is not adjacent to any lot that was established through an urban lot split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot.
K. No unpermltted construction or illegal nonconforming zoning conditions shall exist on the property.
9.56.040 Permitted Locations
A lot on which an urban lot split or SB 9 two-unit residential development is proposed must be located within a single-family residential zone. A lot located within a multiple family or mixed-use zone shall not be eligible to be subdivided through an urban lot split or developed with an SB 9 two-unit residential development pursuant to this chapter.
4 1642726.2
9.56.050 Number of Dwelling Units Permitted on a Lot
A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this code, state law requires the city to permit a lot located within a single-family residential zone to contain two primary dwelling units, provided both units are developed and maintained in compliance with the standards and requirements set forth in this chapter.
B. Provided the lot is not subdivided or created through an urban lot split, development of two primary dwelling units on a lot through an SB 9 two-unit residential development in conformance with this chapter does not preclude the development or maintenance of one or more ADUs and/or JADUs on the lot to the extent permitted by chapter 9.54 and state law.
C. No more than two (2) dwelling units of any kind may be constructed or maintained on a lot that results from an urban lot split. For purposes of this subdivision, the two-unit limitation applies to any combination of primary dwelling units, ADUs, and JADUs.
9.56.060 Separate Conveyance
A. Primary dwelling units located on the same lot may not be owned or conveyed separately from one another. All fee interest in a lot and all dwellings must be held equally and undivided by all individual owners of the lot.
B. Separate conveyance of the two lots resulting from an urban lot split is permitted. If dwellings or other structures (such as garages) on different lots are adjacent or attached to each other, the urban lot split boundary may separate them for conveyance purposes if the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance. If any attached structures span or will span the new lot line, or if the two lots share a driveway pursuant to subsection 9.56.060(Q)(2), appropriate covenants, easements or similar documentation allocating legal and financial rights and responsibilities between the owners of the two lots ("CC&Rs") for construction, reconstruction, use, maintenance, and improvement of the attached structures and any related shared drive aisles, parking areas, or other portions of the lot must be recorded before the city will approve a final parcel map for the urban lot split. Notwithstanding the provision of such CC&Rs, however, where attached structures and/or related shared facilities span a lot line resulting from an urban lot split, all owners of both lots shall be jointly and severally responsible for the use and maintenance of such structures and/or shared facilities in compliance with all provisions of this Code.
C. Condominium airspace divisions and common interest developments are not permitted on a lot created through an urban lot split or containing an SB 9 two-unit residential development.
5 1642726.2
9.56.070 Residential Use Only
No non-residential use is permitted on any lot created through an urban lot split or containing an SB 9 two-unit residential development.
9.56.080 No Short-Term Rentals Permitted
The rental of any dwelling unit on a lot created through an urban lot split or containing an SB 9 two-unit residential development shall be for a term longer than 30 consecutive days.
9.56.090 Housing Crisis Act Replacement Housing Obligations.
If the proposed development will result in the demolition of protected housing, as defined in California Government Code Section 66300, the applicant shall replace each demolished protected unit and comply with all applicable requirements imposed pursuant to subsection (d) of Government Code Section 66300.
9.56.100 Development Standards and Design Criteria
A, Development Standards. A qualifying SB 9 two-unit residential development and any development on a lot created through an urban lot split shall be subject to the standards and criteria set forth in this section. In addition, except as modified or provided by this section or state law, an SB 9 two-unit residential development and any development on a lot created through an urban lot split shall conform to all objective development standards applicable to the lot as set forth in this title and/or in an applicable specific plan or planned unit development ordinance or resolution, along with all applicable objective standards and criteria contained in standard plans and specifications, policies, and/or standard conditions duly promulgated and/or adopted by the city, the Garden Grove Sanitary District, and the Orange County Fire Authority.
B. Unit Size.
1642726.2
1. Minimum Size. Each new primary dwelling unit shall be at least the following minimum sizes based on the number of sleeping rooms provided:
a. Studio/ One bedroom: 500 square feet.
b. More than one bedroom: 700 square feet.
2. Maximum Size.
a. The total floor area of each new primary dwelling unit developed as part of an SB 9 two-unit residential development or on a lot created through an urban lot split shall not exceed 800 square feet.
6
b. A primary dwelling that was legally established on the lot prior to the submittal of a complete application for an SB 9 two-unit development or an urban lot split and has a total floor area of 800 square feet shall be limited to its current lawful floor area and may not be expanded.
c. A primary dwelling that was legally established prior to the submittal of a complete application for an urban lot split or an SB 9 two-unit residential development and that is smaller than 800 square feet may be expanded to 800 square feet.
C. Unit Height; Stories. Each new primary dwelling unit shall be one story, constructed at ground level, and should not be more than 17 feet in height measured from ground level to the highest point on the roof.
D. Setbacks.
1642726.2
1. New Primary Dwelling Units. The following minimum setbacks from the property llnes shall be observed for each new primary dwelling unit and any garages and accessory structures that are attached to a new primary dwelling unit. Detached garages and accessory structures shall comply with the setbacks contained in subsection 2. The required setbacks shall be maintained open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky, except for the permitted intrusions.
a. Front Setback: 20 feet
b. Interior Side Setback: 5 feet
c. Street Side Setback: 10 feet
d. Rear Setback: 15 feet.
2. Detached Garages and Accessory Structures. The following minimum setbacks from the property lines shall be observed for detached garages and accessory structures on a lot.
a. Front Setback: 20 feet
b. Interior Side Setback: 5 feet
c. Street Side Setback: 10 feet
d. Rear Setback: 5 feet.
7
3. Any construction occurring on a lot that abuts a street that has not been fully improved shall observe all building setbacks from the ultimate right-of-way of the street.
4. Exceptions. The above minimum setback requirements do not apply or shall be modified in the following circumstances
a. No increased setback is required for an existing legally established structure or for a new primary dwelling unit that is constructed in the same dimensions as an existing legally established structure, provided that the new primary dwelling unit shall not be greater than 800 square feet.
b. A required minimum setback may be reduced pursuant to subsection W of this section to the degree rt would (i) physically preclude the development or maintenance of two dwelling units on a lot or (Ii) physically preclude any new primary dwelling unit from being 800 square feet in floor area; but in no event may any structure be less than four feet from a side or rear property line. c. Permitted Intrusions. The following permitted intrusion may project into any required setback a maximum of two feet:
cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses, planter boxes, masonry planters, guard railings, chimneys, and architectural projections with no floor area, Including, but not limited to, windows and pilasters.
E. Building Separation. Except as otherwise allowed by state law, a minimum building separation of six (6) feet shall be maintained between all detached structures on a lot, including all residential units, garages, and accessory structures.
F. Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 50%. The lot coverage shall include all buildings and structures (primary and accessory), covered porches and patios, and covered parking areas.
G. Maximum Front Setback Coverage. No more than 50% of the front setback area may contain hardscape, excluding the allowed standard driveway in the front yard.
H. Open Space. Each new primary dwelling unit shall provide, at a minimum, a continuous private recreation area of 225 square feet with minimum interior dimensions of 10 feet. The private recreation area shall be open and unobstructed from the ground to the sky. The private recreation area may be located within the interior side, street side, or rear setback areas. 8 1642726.2
I. Landscaping. All setback areas, and all areas not designated for walkways, parking, drive aisles, and private recreation areas, shall be fully landscaped and irrigated. Each development shall comply with the landscaping and irrigation requirements contained in Chapter 9.08 of Title 9.
J. Perimeter Block Walls. Each development shall provide a masonry perimeter wall with a minimum height of six feet, as measured from the highest point of the finished grade next to the wall, and shall comply with the following stipulations:
1642726.2
1. All perimeter walls shall comply with the requirements as contained in Section 9.08.040.110, Wall, Fences and Hedges.
2. New walls shall not exceed a height of seven feet as measured from the finished point of grade next to the wall. At no time shall the overall height of the wall, as measured from adjacent neighbor's finished grade, exceed eight feet in height.
3. Walls located within the front yard areas, or adjacent to driveways shall not exceed 36 inches in height.
4. Perimeter walls located along any side street shall maintain a minimum setback of three feet from the property line for landscaping purposes.
5. All walls shall be designed to ensure proper vision clearance for cars entering or leaving the driveway and parking areas. No wall or fence shall cause an exceedance of the applicable site distance standards set forth in City of Garden Grove Traffic Engineering Polley TE 13 or In any revised or updated standard or policy promulgated by the city.
6. The property owner shall work with the adjoining property owners in designing and constructing the perimeter block walls to avoid the use of double walls. If the property owner cannot obtain approval from the adjoining property owners, the property owner shall construct the new wall with a decorative cap to be placed between the new and the existing wall.
7. Street facing perimeter block walls shall be decorative and utilize stucco finish, slump stone or split-face block and shall include trailing vines and other landscaping to deter graffiti.
9
K. Off-Street Parking.
1642726.2
1. Required Parking. One off-street parking space must be provided for each new primary dwelling unit unless one of the following applies:
a. The lot is located within one-half mile walking distance of either (i) a high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the California Public Resources Code, or (ii) a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the California Public Resources Code.
b. The lot is located within one block of a car-share vehicle location.
2. Off-street parking spaces for an existing primary dwelling shall continue to be provided in accordance with the standards for the underlying zone.
3. Required parking for new primary dwelling units may be provided within an enclosed garage or as open spaces on the lot, but not as tandem parking. Open spaces may be located within the side or rear setbacks, and in the front setback for driveways that are not shared by more than one housing unit.
4. All required parking spaces provided shall be a minimum of 9 feet wide and 19 feet in depth and shall comply with the size requirements for full size stalls set forth in Standard B-311 of the Standard Plans and Specifications adopted by the city. Parking spaces adjacent and parallel to walls shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide.
5. Any proposed enclosed garage shall meet the following standards:
a. Each enclosed garage shall maintain the following minimum interior parking clearance based on the number of cars it is designed to hold. No storage cabinets or mechanical equipment, including, but not limited to water heaters, utility sinks, or washers and dryers, shall encroach into the required parking area.
Number of Minimum Interior Parking
Cars Area
1 10 feet x 20 feet
2 20 feet by 20 feet
b. The garage shall be equipped with an automatic roll-up garage door opener.
c. Each garage shall maintain the ability to park the required number of vehicles at all times.
10
L. Unit Design Standards.
1. If there ls an existing primary dwelling that was legally established on the lot prior to the filing of a complete application for a two-unit development or an urban lot split, any new additional primary dwelling unit must match the existing primary dwelling unit in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof pitch. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof.
2. If two new primary dwelling units are developed on the lot, the dwellings must match each other in exterior materials, color, and dominant roof pitch. The dominant roof slope is the slope shared by the largest portion of the roof.
3. All exterior lighting must be limited to down-lights.
4. Each new primary dwelling unit shall have a main entry that is clearly defined, and to the extent possible, be oriented directly toward the street(s) in order to provide consistency with the neighborhood. The main entry shall be covered, with a minimum depth of three feet. Each covered entry shall be in proportion with the building and shall incorporate architectural features that are used in the overall building design. All doors shall have standard door locks and dead bolts.
M. Storage Facllitles. Each new primary dwelling unit shall provide a minimum 144 cubic feet of private secure storage space. Normal closets and cupboard space located within the unit shall not count toward meeting the requirement.
N. Laundry Facilities. Each new primary dwelling unit shall have a laundry space located within the unit or within a garage accessible from the unit that is equipped with washer and dryer hook-ups. If the laundry facilities are located within an enclosed garage, the laundry equipment shall not encroach lnto the interior garage parking area.
0. Water Heaters. Each new primary dwelling unit shall have a separate hot water. The location of the water heater shall be incorporated into the design of each unit. No exterior water heater enclosures shall be permitted. Water heaters may be substituted with tankless water heaters provided all building codes are complied with.
P. Mechanical Equipment, Metering Devices. All roof and ground mounted mechanical equipment and metering devices shall be completely screened from view from either on or off the property. All ground mounted equipment and above-ground utility meters, including, but not limited to, heating, cooling, or ventilating equipment, water meters, gas meters, and irrigation equipment, shall be shown on the site plan, and, to the extent possible, be placed outside of the required front setback area. If mechanical equipment or metering devices are to be located between a structure and the property line, an 11 1642726.2
unobstructed path at least three feet wide shall be provided between the equipment and the property line.
Q. Access and Circulation.
1. Each development shall be designed to provide adequate on-site vehicular access, circulation, back-up, and turn-around areas that comply with all the applicable city standards.
2. Where the street frontage of a lot ( or the combined street frontage of the two lots created through an urban lot split) is less than 81 feet, all units on the lot (or all units on both lots created through an urban lot split) shall share the same drive approach and driveway.
3. Driveways shall maintain a minimum width of 20 feet, unless a wider width is required for emergency access.
4. Adequate access to each residential unit on the lot for fire and emergency medical service personnel and vehicles must be provided.
The Orange County Fire Authority must confirm that all applicable fire and emergency access requirements are met before the city will approve an application.
R. Refuse Storage Areas. All developments shall provide each unit with the appropriate number of containers for recyclables, organics, and non-recyclable solid waste ("trash containers") as required by the Garden Grove Sanitary District, and shall comply with the following:
1. Trash containers shall be stored within designated storage areas only and not within the garage parking area.
2. The placement of trash containers for pick-up, and the duration of time prior to and after trash collection of those trash containers, is subject to the Garden Grove Sanitary District requirements.
3. The area required for each container shall be a minimum of 38 inches by 38 inches.
4. The trash areas shall be paved and accessed by gates and a walkway for ease of taking trash containers to and from the street. s. Utilities.
1642726.2
1. Each primary dwelling unit on a lot must have its own direct utility connection to the utility / public service provider.
2. All necessary and/or required easements for the provision of electricity, gas, water, sewer, and other utility or public service to the lot and each 12
primary dwelling unit must be obtained by the property owner / applicant. The city may condition approval of an application under this section upon the applicant providing evidence that such easements have been agreed to and/or recorded.
3. Submitted plans shall show the location and dimension of all proposed above-ground and underground utility and public service facilities serving the lot and each dwelling unit and the location and dimensions of all related easements.
T. Building and Safety. All structures built on the lot must comply with all current local building standards.
U. Drainage and Stormwater Management. Each lot shall drain to the street or to an approved storm drain facility. The design of parkway culverts and storm drain lateral pipe connections to city-maintained storm drains within the city right-of-way shall comply with applicable city standards. SB 9 two-unit residential developments and the development of lots created through an urban lot split are subject to Chapter 6.40 of this code ("Stormwater Quality") and must comply with all applicable related rules, requirements, and standards, including, but not limited to, the preparation and implementation of a water quality management plan that meets applicable requirements.
V. Address Identification. Each residential unit shall have a separate address and shall be provided with approved address identification that is visible from the street fronting the lot in accordance with Section R319 of the California Residential Code. Where the unit address on the bulldlng cannot be viewed from the street fronting the lot, a monument, pole, or other means consistent with city standards shall be used to identify the unit. Where required by the fire code official, address identification shall be provided In addltlonal approved locations to facilitate emergency response.
W. Exceptions to Objective Standards.
1642726.2
1. Any objective zoning, subdivision, or design standard that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two primary residential units on a lot or that would physically preclude each new unit from being 800 square feet in floor area shall be modified or waived to the extent necessary to allow the development of two primary residential units on a lot pursuant to this chapter that are each 800 square feet in floor area. The city prioritizes some objective development standards over others, as provided in subsection 2, below.
In applying the exceptions required by this subsection, a proposed project shall be designed such that a development standard given a lower priority is modified or waived before a development standard given a higher priority. If a proposed project can be designed such that each lot can accommodate two 800 square foot primary dwelling units by modifying or waiving a development standard with a lower priority, 13
then an application that proposes a design requiring the modification or waiver of a development standard with a higher priority will be denied.
2. Priority of Development Standards. The city prioritizes the following development standards in the following descending order of priority, with the first development standard listed having the highest priority:
a. Height; Stories.
b. Front setback.
c. Maximum front setback hardscape coverage (50%).
d. Open space (225 square feet).
e. Minimum unit size.
f. Side or rear setback (a minimum of 4 feet must be maintained). g. Lot coverage (50%).
h. Building separation (minimum separation required by Building Code must be maintained).
3. This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit the construction of new garages or accessory structures, or the maintenance of existing accessory structures not providing required parking, where the development or maintenance of two 800 square foot dwelling units on the lot would not be physically precluded in the absence of such proposed or existing structures.
4. Building standards, standards required by federal, state or local law or for sanitation or safety reasons, the off-site parking requirements in subsection K of this section, and the lot size, access, and frontage requirements set forth in Section 9.56.110 will not be waived or modified unless otherwise required by state law.
5. As part of its application, the applicant shall provide a written explanation that (a) specifically describes every development standard the applicant seeks to modify and waive, and to what extent, (b) demonstrates why waiver or modification of each development standard is needed to prevent physically precluding the construction of up to two primary residential units on the lot and/or each new unit from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, and (c) demonstrates that the requested modifications and/or waivers are consistent with the priority set forth in this subsection.
14
9.56.110 Additional Requirements for Urban Lot Splits
A. An urban lot split must conform to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, including implementing requirements in this code, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no dedication of rights-of-way or construction of offsite improvements is required solely for an urban lot split.
B. Lot Size. The parcel map for an urban lot spilt must subdivide an existing lot to create no more than two new lots of approximately equal lot area, provided that one lot shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original lot proposed for subdivision. Both newly created lots must each be no smaller than 1,200 square feet.
C. Easements.
1. The owner must enter Into an easement agreement with each utility/public-service provider to establish easements that are sufficient for the provision of public services and facilltles to each of the resulting lots.
2. Each easement must be shown on the tentative parcel map and the final parcel map.
3. Copies of the unrecorded easement agreements must be submitted with the application. The easement agreements must be recorded against the property before the final parcel map may be approved.
D. Lot Access.
1. Each resulting lot must adjoin the public right-of-way.
2. Each resulting lot must have frontage on the public right-of-way of at least 25 feet.
E. Improvements Required. Each resulting lot must be developed in accordance with improvement plans processed concurrently with the parcel map application and approved by the city, showing the location and dimensions of all structures, drive aisles, parking areas, pedestrian pathways, and other improvements proposed to be constructed or to remain on each lot. Approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split shall be subject to the city's approval of such related improvement plans and all related entitlements or other approvals required by this code. Any proposed development on one of the lots that is inconsistent with or not shown on the improvement plans approved concurrently with the urban lot split shall be subject to review and approval by the city in accordance with the applicable requirements of this code. 15 1642726.2
F. Required Affidavit. The applicant for a parcel map for an urban lot split must sign an affidavit provided by the city stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the dwelling units on one of the resulting lots as the applicant's principal residence for a minimum of three years after the final parcel map for the urban lot split is approved.
9.56.120 Compliance with Emergency Access and Service Requirements Development of a lot pursuant to this chapter must conform and comply with all applicable provisions of the fire code and applicable requirements promulgated by the Orange County Fire Authority intended to ensure sufficient emergency access is provided or maintained. Prior to submitting a complete application for an SB 9 two unit residential development or an urban lot split, the applicant shall obtain and provide city with written confirmation from the Orange County Fire Authority that the proposed development complies with all such requirements.
9.56.130 Deed Restriction.
Prior to approval of a parcel map for an urban lot split and/or the issuance of a building permit for the development of an SB 9 two-unit residential development, the owner(s) of record of the property shall provide the Director a copy of a covenant agreement, declaration of restrictions, or similar deed restriction ("deed restriction") recorded against the property, which is in a form prepared by and/or acceptable to the Director, and that does each of the following:
A. Expressly requires the rental of any dwelling unit on the property be for a term longer than 30 consecutive days.
B. Expressly prohibits any non-residential use of the lot.
C. Expressly prohibits primary dwelling units located on the same lot from being owned or conveyed separately from one another.
D. Expressly requires all fee interest in each lot and all dwellings to be held equally and undivided by all individual owners of the lot.
E. Expressly prohibits condominium airspace divisions and common interest developments on the property.
F. States that the property was formed and/or developed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and is therefore subject to the city regulations set forth in this chapter, including all applicable limits on dwelling size and development.
G. Expressly prohibits more than two (2) dwelling units of any kind from being constructed or maintained on a lot that results from an urban lot split. 16 1642726.2
H. States (i) that the deed restriction is for the benefit of and is enforceable by the city, (ii) that the deed restriction shall run with the land and shall bind future owners, their heirs, and successors and assigns, (iii) that lack of compliance with the deed restriction shall be good cause for legal action against the owner{s) of the property; (iv) that, if the city is required to bring legal action to enforce the deed restriction, then the city shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees and court costs; and (v) that the deed restriction may not be modified or terminated without the prior written consent of the Director.
9.56.140 Fees
Development of lots pursuant to this section shall be subject to all applicable fees, including development impact fees, and assessments, duly adopted by the city.
9.56.150 Objective Standard Conditions.
The Director is authorized to promulgate objective standard conditions implementing this section, which are consistent with this Code and state law, that shall apply to the application and development of two-unit developments and urban lot splits, and to publish such standard conditions on the city's internet website. Applicants must comply with all standard conditions duly promulgated by the Director and published on the city's Internet website.
9.56.160 Expiration of Approval,
The approval of an SB 9 two-unit residential development shall become null and void if construction is not commenced within one (1) year of the approval and diligently advanced until completion of the project. In the event construction of the project is commenced, but not diligently advanced untll completion, the rights granted pursuant to the approval shall expire if the building permits for the project expire. 17 1642726.2
ADD NEW SECTION 9.40.250 TO CHAPTER 9.40 (SUBDIVISIONS) OF TITLE 9 (LAND USE) AS FOLLOWS:
9.40.250 Urban Lot Splits
A. The provisions of this section apply to the processing of parcel maps for urban lot splits pursuant to Callfornla Government Code section 66411. 7 and chapter 9.56 of this code.
B. Approval. Notwithstanding the Subdivision Map Act or any other provision of this chapter, an application for a parcel map for an urban lot split is approved or denied ministerially, by the city's community and economic development director, without discretionary review. A tentative parcel map for an urban lot split is approved ministerially if It complies with the requirements of chapter
9.56 and appllcable objective requirements of this chapter 9.40 and the Subdivision Map Act. The tentative parcel map may not be recorded. A final parcel map is approved ministerially as well, but not until the owner demonstrates that the required documents have been recorded, such as the deed restriction and easements.
C. Guidance and Procedures. The city engineer has the authority to interpret and establish guidance and procedures for the processing, approving, and finalizing parcel maps for urban lot splits, which are consistent with state and local law. 18 1642726.2
MINUTE EXCERPT
GARDEN GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING -AMENDMENT NO. A-033-2021, CITY OF GARDEN GROVE.
CITYWIDE.
...
Applicant: CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
Date: December 2, 2021
Request: A request by the City of Garden Grove to amend portions of Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal code to implement the provisions of California Government Code Sections E25852.21 and 66411.7, added by Senate B111 9, and to add regulations and development standards for two-unit housing developments and parcel maps for urban lot splits in single-family residential zones. The project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411. 7(n) and Sections 15303 and 15315 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Action: Resolution No. 6035-21 was approved.
Motion: Soeffner Second: Lindsay
Ayes: (5) Arestegui, Cunningham, Lindsay, Ramirez, Soeffner Noes: (O) None
Absent: (2) Lehman, Perez •
Agenda Item - 3.b.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Maria Stipe
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: City Manager
Subject: First public hearing
regarding the Redistricting
Process post 2020
Census. (Action Item)
Date: 1/11/2022
OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to conduct the first public hearing regarding the redistricting process post 2020 Census.
BACKGROUND
After each decennial census, local governments must use new census data to redraw their district lines to reflect how local populations have changed. Federal law requires that districts be nearly equal in population. The Fair Maps Act, Assembly Bill 849 (2019) requires cities and counties to engage their communities in the redistricting process by holding public hearings and/or workshops and doing public outreach, including to non-English-speaking communities.
Due to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and other events, the 2020 census count data was released later than originally anticipated. When the final data was published, it showed only a modest increase in the City’s population, which suggested that the City might not need to go through a redistricting process.
However, various public interest groups, objected to bypassing the redistricting process. Because the law does not specifically provide for bypassing the 10-year redistricting process, the City determined to proceed with the process. New district maps must be adopted by the Council no later than April 17, 2022, for the November 2022 election.
David Ely of Compass Demographics, the firm that assisted the City in establishing its first district map will guide the City in establishing district boundaries based on the 2020 census. The redistricting process will involve several public hearings that will allow for public input on the formation of the districts. Vietnamese and Spanish translators will be provided at all public hearings and the public workshop.
Translators for Chinese and Korean will also be provided, but must be requested at least 72 hours in advance by contacting the City Clerk's Office.
DISCUSSION
California Elections Code sections 21601 et seq. sets forth the City Council public hearing process for establishing district boundaries. This process requires a minimum of four noticed public hearings during which the public has a right to provide input on proposed district boundaries. Specifically, the City must hold at least one “clean slate” hearing at which the public can provide input on district boundaries before any maps are prepared. Thereafter, the City must hold at least two more public hearings to consider draft maps and then a final public hearing to approve a map. At or after the fourth public hearing the Council establishes the final map by adopting an ordinance.
The purpose of the first public hearing is to inform the public about the districting process and to hear from the community on what factors should be taken into consideration while creating district boundaries. The public is requested to provide input regarding communities of interest and other local factors that should be considered while drafting district maps. A “community of interest” is a “contiguous population that shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” These may include a neighborhood or group that would benefit from being in the same district because of shared interests, views, cultures, histories, languages, and values and whose boundaries can be identified on a map. Possible community features include, but are not limited to:
Shared interests in schools, housing, community safety, transit, health conditions, land use, environmental conditions, and/or other issues.
Common social and civic networks, including churches, mosques, temples, home-owner associations, and community centers, and shared use of community spaces, like parks and shopping centers.
Racial and ethnic compositions, cultural identities, and households that predominantly speak a language other than English.
Similar socio-economic status, including but not limited to income, home ownership, and education levels.
Shared political boundary lines from other jurisdictions, such as school districts, community college districts, and water districts.
In creating the district boundaries, the City must ensure compliance with the following federal and state mandated criteria:
Federal Laws
:
1. Each council district shall contain a nearly equal population (based on total population of residents as determined by the most recent Federal decennial Census and adjusted by the State to reassign incarcerated persons to the last known place of residence); and
2. Each council district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act. No council district shall be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the United States Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny.
•
•
•
•
•
California Criteria for Cities (to the extent practicable and in the following order of priority):
1. Geographically contiguous (areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. Areas that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge, tunnel, or ferry service are not contiguous).
2. Undivided neighborhoods and "communities of interest" (Socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together for purposes of its effective and fair representation).
3. Easily identifiable boundaries.
4. Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people).
5. Prohibited: “Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party.”
Other Traditional Districting Principles
:
1. Preserving the core of existing districts.
2. Minimize voters shifted to different election years.
3. Future population growth.
4. Respect voters' choices / continuity of representation.
Community Engagement
:
The City has developed a comprehensive community engagement plan intended to maximize awareness, education and participation through each step of the redistricting process. The City has created a webpage, https://ggcity.org/redistricting and has issued press releases and social media posts pertaining to this public hearing and the following additional hearings and workshop:
EVENT DATE & TIME
First Public Hearing - Pre-Draft Discussion, Summary of Redistricting Law, Criteria, 2020 Census, and Process
Tuesday, January 11,
2022; 7:00 p.m.
Public Workshop - Communities of Interest
Saturday, January 29,
2022; 10:00 a.m. to
12:00 p.m.
Second Public Hearing - Presentation of Community Input and District Alternatives, City Council Consideration and Direction Regarding Draft Map
Tuesday, February 8,
2022; 7:00 p.m.
Third Public Hearing - Public Input on Draft Map Tuesday, February 22, 2022; 7:00 p.m.
Fourth Public Hearing - Presentation of Proposed Ordinance and City Council Member District Boundaries Map, City
Council First Reading
Tuesday, March 8,
2022; 7:00 p.m.
Public Meeting - Second Reading of Ordinance and City
Council Member District Boundaries Map
Tuesday, March 22,
2022; 7:00 p.m.
The website will be updated as the City proceeds with the redistricting process, including the provision of tools that would allow the public to draw and/or review
draft maps.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds for the redistricting process and related district map updates are included in the current FY 2021-22 City budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
Receive a report on the districting process and permissible criteria to be considered to create district boundaries; and
Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type File Name
City Council District
Information 1/7/2022 Backup Material City_Council_District_Information.GG2021_(1).pdf
•
•
Garden Grove City Council Districts
District 1 2 3 4 5 6 Citywide
Population20 Adjusted 28802 29085 28732 29321 28384 28022 172346 Deviation 78 361 8 597 -340 -702 1299
% Deviation 0.3% 1.3% 0.0% 2.1% - 1.2% -2.4% 4.5%
Latino 26.2% 32.9% 27.3% 30.2% 46.6% 61.8% 37.3%
White 36.5% 18.7% 12.3% 9.9% 13.9% 6.9% 16.4%
Black 1.5% 1.2% 1.2% 0.8% 1.2% 0.9% 1.1%
Asian 32.7% 44.8% 57.4% 57.4% 36.5% 28.9% 43.1%
Citizen Voting Age 2019
Latino 16.8% 21.5% 15.0% 23.0% 37.1% 50.4% 26.7%
White 49.1% 31.0% 18.6% 16.7% 22.5% 15.2% 25.9%
Black 2.1% 1.0% 1.5% 0.4% 0.9% 1.5% 1.2%
Asian 31.2% 45.3% 63.2% 58.3% 37.9% 32.5% 44.9%
All Other 0.8% 1.2% 1.7% 1.6% 1.5% 0.5% 1.2%
Garden Grove City Council Districts
Population Deviation % with 2020 Adjusted Population
©2016 CALIPER
Garden Grove City Council Districts
District 1 2 3 4
2010 Census
Population 28303 28677 28356 28802
Deviation -178 196 -125 321
% Deviation -0.6% 0.7% -0.4% 1.1%
2020 Census
Population 28751 29017 28673 29257
Deviation 93 359 15 599
% Deviation 0.3% 1.3% 0.1% 2.1%
2020 Adjusted
Population 28802 29085 28732 29321
Deviation 78 361 8 597
% Deviation 0.3% 1.3% 0.0% 2.1%
5 6
28587 28158
106 -323
0.4% - 1.1%
28307 27944
-351 -714
-1.2% -2.5%
28384 28022
-340 -702
-1.2% -2.4%
Citywide
170883
644
2.3%
171949
1313
4.6%
172346
1299
4.5%
Max Deviation
%
Max Deviation
%
Max Deviation
%
Garden Grove City Council Districts
2020 Census State Adjusted Population
Hawaiian Multi
White Black American Pacific Other Race 2020 Census Unadjusted District Population Deviation % Deviation Latino Asian Minority Indian Islander Race Population
1 28802 78 0.3% 26.2% 36.5% 1.5% 0.9% 32.7% 0.4% 1.0% 0.7% 28751 99.8% 2 29085 361 1.3% 32.9% 18.7% 1.2% 0.5% 44.8% 0.6% 0.7% 0.5% 29017 99.8% 3 28732 8 0.0% 27.3% 12.3% 1.2% 0.4% 57.4% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 28673 99.8% 4 29321 597 2.1% 30.2% 9.9% 0.8% 0.4% 57.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.3% 29257 99.8% 5 28384 -340 -1.2% 46.6% 13.9% 1.2% 0.5% 36.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 28307 99.7% 6 28022 -702 -2.4% 61.8% 6.9% 0.9% 0.2% 28.9% 0.4% 0.6% 0.3% 27944 99.7% 2020 Census State Adjusted Voting Age Population 2019 Tabulation Citizen Voting Age Population I Hawaiian Multi
White Black American Pacific Other Race White Black All Other District Latino Indian Asian Minority Latino Asian Islander Race
1 23.4% 39.4% 1.3% 1.0% 33.0% 0.4% 1.0% 0.5% 16.8% 49.1% 2.1% 31.2% 0.8% 2 30.2% 21.0% 1.2% 0.4% 45.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.4% 21.5% 31.0% 1.0% 45.3% 1.2% 3 24.6% 13.6% 1.2% 0.4% 58.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 15.0% 18.6% 1.5% 63.2% 1.7% 4 27.6% 11.2% 0.8% 0.4% 58.8% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 23.0% 16.7% 0.4% 58.3% 1.6% 5 43.3% 15.8% 1.2% 0.6% 37.8% 0.5% 0.6% 0.3% 37.1% 22.5% 0.9% 37.9% 1.5% 6 57.4% 8.4% 1.0% 0.3% 31.8% 0.4% 0.6% 0.2% 50.4% 15.2% 1.5% 32.5% 0.5% 2019 American Community Survey Socio-economic Characteristics Household Income Education Level Language Spoken at Home Less than $35K to $75K to $150K or Income No High No College Any College Owner Other Asian District Below Unemployed School Occupied English Only Spanish $35K $74,999 $149,999 More Degree Degree Language Language Poverty Diiploma Housing 1 22.1% 24.8% 30.0% 23.1% 10.3% 4.7% 16.4% 45.5% 38.1% 63.3% 57.8% 11.1% 28.8% 2.3% 2 24.7% 26.9% 30.7% 17.7% 16.3% 4.0% 23.4% 48.4% 28.2% 61.9% 34.6% 26.1% 37.2% 2.0% 3 29.4% 29.0% 27.6% 14.0% 17.5% 6.5% 26.3% 42.2% 31.5% 43.9% 27.1% 18.3% 51.2% 3.3% 4 27.1% 31.0% 28.6% 13.3% 13.5% 4.5% 26.8% 44.6% 28.6% 50.4% 23.6% 24.4% 49.7% 2.3% 5 22.4% 26.9% 36.7% 14.0% 13.3% 4.6% 24.9% 46.8% 28.3% 56.3% 29.5% 41.7% 27.2% 1.7% 6 24.2% 33.2% 34.2% 8.4% 13.9% 3.6% 34.5% 45.1% 20.4% 40.5% 21.3% 53.6% 24.4% 0.7% Agenda Item - 4.a.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Teresa Pomeroy
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: City Clerk
Subject: Consideration of an
appointment to fill a vacancy
on the Neighborhood
Improvement and
Conservation Commission.
(Continued from the meeting
held on December 14, 2021.)
(Action Item)
Date: 1/11/2022
OBJECTIVE
For the Mayor to appoint and for the City Council to approve an appointment to fill the vacancy on the Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commission (NICC).
BACKGROUND
Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commissioner Brandon Chavira resigned on September 14, 2021, and at the City Council meeting on September 28, 2021, Mr. Chavira's resignation was accepted with regret. The City Clerk's Office posted and published a vacancy notice for the NICC on October 6, 2021, the vacancy was also published in a press release and on the City's social media platforms.
DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Garden Grove Municipal Code 2.21.010(A) and Government Code Section 40605, the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, shall make all appointments to boards, commissions, and committees unless otherwise specifically provided by statute. The attached lists Garden Grove residents who submitted applications for the NICC who were not selected during the 2020 recruitment; as well as applications that were submitted between and for vacancies.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council:
Consider and appoint a Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commissioner to fill the vacancy and complete Brandon Chavira's term.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type File Name
Vacancy Notice 10/20/2021 Backup
Material NICC-_Special_Vacancy_Notice_Affidavit_of_Publication_-_OCN.pdf Press Release 10/20/2021 Backup
Material 10-4-21_NICC_vacancy_press_release.pdf
List of
Applicants 12/8/2021 Backup
Material Neighborhood_Improvement_and_Conservation_Commission_List.pdf
•
AFFP
110966 NICC Vacancy Notice
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA}
COUNTY OF ORANGE }
ss
I am a citizen of the United States; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principle clerk of the printer of ORANGE COUNTY NEWS, a newspaper of general
circulation, published ONCE WEEKLY in the city of
GARDEN GROVE, County of ORANGE, which newspaper
has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of ORANGE, State of
California under the date of March 20, 1964, Case
Number A-31502; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the
following dates, to-wit:
October 06, 2021
That said newspaper was regularly issued and circulated on those dates ..
SIGNED:
Orange County News
Subscribed to and sworn by me this 6th day of October
2021.
00007270 00110966
75 LEGAL
OCN-CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
P.O. BOX 3070
GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT AND
CONSERVATION COMMISSION SPECIAL
VACANCY NOTICE
Pursuant to Garden Grove Municipal Code Section 2.21.013, notice is hereby given that the Garden Grove Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commission has an unscheduled vacancy with the term expiring December 2022. Information and a Commission application can be obtained by accessing the City's website at:
www.ggcity.org or by visiting the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 11222 Acacia Parkway, Garden Grove, California or by calling (714) 741-5040.
Commissioners are non-compensated volunteers. The Neighborhood and Conservation Commission consists of seven members who are electors residing in Garden Grove. The current vacancy is to complete the term held by Commissioner Brandon Chavira. Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commission meetings are regularly scheduled on the 1st Monday of March, June, September, and December at 6:30 p.m., and are held in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 , Stanford Avenue , Garden Grove, California.
/s/ TERESA POMEROY, CMC
City Clerk
Orange County News 10/6/2021-110966
Follow the City of Garden Grove on Social Media
CONTACT:
Teresa Pomeroy (714) 741-5040
City Clerk
Monday, October 4, 2021
CITY SEEKS CANDIDATE FOR NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT AND
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
The City of Garden Grove is seeking a qualified candidate to serve as a non- compensated commissioner on the Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commission (NICC). Applicants must be and remain a Garden Grove resident and a registered voter until the term expires in December 2022. To apply online, visit ggcity.org/city-clerk/applications, or request an application from the City Clerk’s Office, located in Garden Grove City Hall, at 11222 Acacia Parkway. The position will remain open until filled.
Regular NICC Meetings are held on the first Monday in March, June, September, and December at 6:30 p.m., at the Garden Gove Community Meeting Center, located at 11300 Stanford Avenue. Applicants must be able to attend all meetings. The Neighborhood Improvement and Conservation Commission is an advisory commission that promotes citizen awareness, involvement, and support for neighborhood improvement and preservation, and for the efficient use and conservation of energy resources throughout the community. For more information, visit ggcity.org/city-clerk or call (714) 741-5040.
###
GARDEN GROVE
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
NEWS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Public Information Office {714) 741-5280
11222 Acacia Parkway • P.O.Box 3070 • Garden Grove, CA 92842 www.ci .garden -grov e.ca.us
APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR THE NICC DURING THE 2020 OPEN
RECRUITMENT NOT SELECTED
NAME DATE SUBMITTED DISTRICT
1. Marion Cubero February 1, 2020 1
2. Juliane Nguyen September 18, 2020 5
3. Jarad Wallace September 28, 2020 4
4. Julie Rojas October 15, 2020 4
5. Melinda Melendez December 10, 2020 3
6. Donald Taylor December 13, 2020 3
7. William Slusser December 19, 2020 3
8. Ramiro Landeros Jr. December 22, 2020 5
9. Peterson Pham December 23, 2020 4
10. Tanya Cook January 21, 2020 5
APPLICATIONS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO VACANCY FOR PARKS,
RECREATION AND ARTS COMMISSION NOT SELECTED
NAME DATE SUBMITTED DISTRICT
1. Kelly Seay May 4, 2021 5
2. Mark Merlino May 4, 2021 3
3. Yvonne Murray May 5, 2021 2
4. Donald Taylor May 5, 2021 3
5. Pamela Buck May 6, 2021 1
6. Josephine Hernandez May 8, 2021 4
7. Marti Carroll May 8, 2021 5
8. Kelli Price May 15, 2021 2
9. Nicholas Dibs May 20, 2021 1
APPLICATIONS ON FILE BETWEEN RECRUITMENT AND VACANCIES
NAME DATE SUBMITTED DISTRICT
1. Hermilo Marquez March 3, 2021 2
2. Briyana Negrette September 29, 2021 5
APPLICATIONS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO 2021 NICC VACANCY
NAME DATE SUBMITTED DISTRICT
1. Andy Ngo October 19, 2021 3
2. Miguel Curiel October 25, 2021 6
Agenda Item - 5.a.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Lisa Kim
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community and Economic
Development Department
Subject: Second reading and adoption
of Ordinance No. 2926
Date: 1/11/2022
Attached is Ordinance No, 2926 recommended for second reading and adoption.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type File Name
Ordinance No. 2926 1/5/2022 Ordinance 2926_GG_Ordinance_12-14-21_A-032- 2021_Draft_Ordinance_(Outdoor_dining).docx
ORDINANCE NO. 2926
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. A-032-2021, A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT TO PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 9.16 (COMMERCIAL, OFFICE PROFESSIONAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) OF TITLE 9 OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING ENHANCED DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONAL
STANDARDS AND MODIFIED PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR INCIDENTAL OUTDOOR
DINING AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH EATING ESTABLISHMENTS/RESTAURANTS
WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES
City Attorney Summary
This Ordinance approves zoning text amendments to portions of Chapter
9.16 (Commercial, Office Professional, Industrial, and Open Space Development Standards) of Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code to update the special operating conditions and development standards , and parking requirements for eating establishments/restaurant uses with outdoor dining within C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), C -2 (Community Commercial), C-3 (Heavy Commercial), M -1 (Limited Industrial), and M -P (Industrial Park) zones. The amendments revise the existing standards in a manner that makes them generally consistent with the standards applicable to similar incidental outdoor dining areas in the mixed use zoning districts. Restaurant uses that include outdoor dining areas are a permitted use in commercial and i ndustrial zoning districts. This Ordinance enacts additional and more specific operating conditions and development standards for these uses, including provisions regulating the design and location of outdoor dining areas , requirements for separation of outdoor dining areas from pedestrian and vehicular pathways and the public right - of-way, an d alcoholic beverage sales in outdoor dining areas. This Ordinance also creates separate parking requirements for outdoor dining areas within commercial and industrial zoning districts, which provide that no additional parking is required for the first 500 square feet of an outdoor dining area that is open on at least three sides and not covered by a roof structure.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, outdoor dining at eating establishments is currently a permitted incidental and accessory use within the commercial and industrial zones;
WHEREAS, portions of commercial and i ndustrial zoned properties can accommodate outdoor dining areas that do not encroach into, and that still preserve, the required path of travel for pedestrians, and on-site vehicle circulation;
WHEREAS, allowing for and encouraging more outdoor dining areas in commercial and industrial zones will further General Plan goals and policies;
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2926
WHEREAS, Amendment No. A -032-2021 was initiated by the City of Garden Grove and is a zoning text amendment to portions of Chap ter 9.16 (Commercial, Office Professional, Industrial , and Open Space Development Standards) of Title 9 (Land Use Code) of the Garden Grove Municipal Code to establish enhanced special operating conditions and development standards and modified parking requirements for eating establishments/restaurants with outdoor dining areas within the commercial and industrial zoning districts;
WHEREAS, following a Public Hearing held on November 4, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 6033-21 recommending approval of Amendment No. A-032-2021;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a legal notice, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed adoption of this Ordinance was held by the City Council on December 14, 2021, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard;
WHEREAS, the City Council gave due and careful consideration to the matter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby incorporates by reference the findings and reasons set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6033-21, and makes the following findings regarding Amendment No. A-032-2021:
A. The Amendment is internally consistent with the go als, objectives and elements of the City’s General Plan.
B. The Amendment will promote the public interest, health, safety and welfare.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Cal. Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. pursuant to Sections 15301, Existing Facilities, and 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal.
Code of Regs., Title 14, Sections 15301 and 15303).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The facts and reasons stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 6033-21 recommending approval of Amendment No. A-032-2021, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, are hereby incorporated herein by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full.
SECTION 3 : Subdivision V of Section 9.16 .020.050 (Special Operating Conditions and Development Standards ) of Chapter 9.16 (Commercial, Of fice Professional, Industrial, and Open Space Development Standards ) of Title 9 of the
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2926
Garden Grove Municipal Code is hereby amended as fo llows (deletions shown in strikethrough, additions shown in bold-italics):
V. Eating Establishment/Restaurant with Outdoor Seating.
1. Incidental Use Only. With the exception of permitted joint -use outdoor dining areas as provided for in paragraph 5 below, the outdoor dining area must be accessory to the eating establishment/restaurant.
2. The seating area must not encroach into any required setback, parking and/or circulation area, required landscape areas, or required paths of travel.
3. The outdoor seating areas shall have a clearly marked perimeter.
2. Design. Outdoor dining areas shall be open on at least three sides, and open to the sky . Non-fixed umbrellas and awnings and canopies that accent the building are permitted. Side panels or any other accessories that enclose the outdoor dining area are prohibited.
3. Location.
a. The seating area shall not encroach into any required front setback, parking and/or vehicular ci rculation area, required landscape areas, required paths -of-travel, or public rights -of- way.
b. Within any Commercial or Industrial zone, outdoor dining areas may be permitted within the required side or rear setback area, consistent with the requirements of this chapter. c. The outdoor dining area must be located immediately
adjacent to, abutting, and adjoining the establishment with which it is associated, and shall not extend beyond the building and/or storefront frontage and/or length of the tenant space of the associated primary establishment.
4. Delineation of Area. Any outdoor dining area serving a single business shall maintain a clearly marked perimeter and shall be separated from vehicular pathways and public sidewalks with low walls and/or landscape hedges a minimum of 30 inches in depth or 42 inches in height. Establishments that include the service or sale of alcoholic beverages are subject to additional separation requirements provided in subsection 6 (Alcoholic Beverage Sales in Outdoor Din ing Areas) of this section.
5. Outdoor dining areas for joint -use between businesses shall be separated from pedestrian and vehicular pathways with low walls and/or landscaping. Joint-use outdoor dining areas are not required to be located immediately adjacent to an establishment, but shall be located within 25 feet of at least one establish ment participating in the joint-use area. Where adjacent to a public right -of-way, the area shall be delineated as required by subsection 4 (Delineation of Area) of this subdivision V. No alcohol shall be served in any outdoor dining area that serves more than one business.
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2926
6. Alcoholic Beverage Sales in Outdoor Dining Areas. The service of alcoholic beverages and its consumption by customers in an outdoor dining area shall comply with Section 9.16.020.080 (Alcohol Beverage Sales) and furthermore, shall be restricted as follows:
a. Any establishment permitted to sell alcohol that maintains an outdoor dining area shall separate the outdoor dining area with a wall, fence, or hedge that is intended to clearly delineate the dining area from pedestrian traffic, and prevent ease of access in any manner to this area by pedestrians and other non-patrons. The wall, fence, or hedge shall fully enclose the outdoor dining area to separate it from public access ways. The wall, fence, or hedge shall consist of a minimum five -foot-high barrier and/or other special separation/improvement from surroundings that would hinder access from pedestrians to the outdoor dining area, as de termined by the Police Chief. The barrier/fencing shall be subject to the following standards:
i. Any barrier/fencing around the outdoor area
perimeter shall allow visibility into the area from adjacent properties and streets.
ii. Any barrier/fencing around the outdoor area
perimeter shall be architecturally compatible with the
structure housing the eating or drinking establishment. iii. The location, design, and placement of any
barrier/fencing are subject to review and approval by the Planning Services Division during the site plan review or conditional use permit review process.
b. Ingress and egress to/from the outdoor dining area shall be from the interior of the eating or drinking establishment only.
There shall be no ingress or egress permitt ed to/from the outdoor dining area to any parking area, landscape area, or public right -of-way except for emergency purposes only. Any proposed accesses located within the outdoor dining area that lead to any locations other than into the eating or drinkin g establishment shall be marked as emergency exits only and shall be provided with panic hardware.
c. The operator shall post a written notice to customers, as approved by the City, which states that the drinking or carrying of an alcoholic beverage ou tside of the outdoor dining area is prohibited and unlawful.
d. Hours of operation shall not begin prior to 7:00 a.m. nor extend later than 10:00 p.m.
SECTION 4: Subsection 2 (Eating/Drinking Establishments – Restaurants, Cafés, Cafeterias, Lounges, Bars) of Subdivision B (Commercial Uses) of Section
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2926
9.16.040.150 ( Parking Spaces Required ) of Chapter 9.16 ( Commercial, Of fice Professional, Industrial, and Open Space Development Standards) of Title 9 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows to add specific parking standards for outdoor dining areas associated with eating and drinking establishments (additions shown in bold-italics):
USE REQUIRED MINIMUM PARKING SPACES
2. Eating/Drinking Establishments – Restaurants,
Cafés, Cafeterias, Lounges, Bars
a. Attached 0-16 seats less than 300 sq. ft. of
customer/dining area
1 space per 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area
b. Attached 16+ seats 1 space per 100 sq. ft. of gross floor area with a min. of 10 spaces
c. Freestanding 1 space per 100 sq. ft. of gross floor area with a min. of 10 spaces
d. With entertainment 1 space per 100 sq. ft. of gross floor area (seating and service), plus 1 space per 35 sq . ft. of
entertainment area, plus 1 space per 7 sq. ft. of
dance floor
e. Outdoor dining No additional parking required for the first 500 square feet of outdoor dining area. For
any area in excess of 500 square feet,
parking shall be provided as required above
for the applicable use. Where dining areas
are enclosed on at least three sides, all
parking shall be provided as required for the
above applicable use.
SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the vali dity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any o ne or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, words or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption.
The foregoing Ordinance was passed by the City Council of the C ity of Garden Grove on the ___ day of ______.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY CLERK
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2926
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS:
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE )
I, TERESA POMEROY, City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading and passed to second reading on December 14, 2021, with a vote as follows:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (7) BRIETIGAM, O’NEILL, NGUYEN D., BUI, KLOPFENSTEIN, NGUYEN K., JONES
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (0) NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (0) NONE
Agenda Item - 5.b.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Second reading and adoption
of Ordinance No. 2928
Date: 1/11/2022
Attached is Ordinance No, 2928 recommended for second reading and adoption.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload Date Type File Name
Ordinance 2928 1/5/2022 Ordinance 2928_GG_Ordinance_2021_edits_TS_12- 14-21_1st_reading.docx
ORDINANCE NO. 2928
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 OF TITLE 10 OF THE GARDEN GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED CITY STREETS BASED
UPON AN UPDATED TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SPEED SURVEY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Code Amendment. Chapter 36 of Title 10 of the Garden Grove Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 36: SPEED RESTRICTIONS
SECTION 10.36.010: Speed zoning
The City Engineer is authorized and required to make the appropriate engineering and traffic investigation, which is the basis for the current prima facie speed zones as, specified in Section 10.36.030. This type of study shall be main tained current and updated every five years, except to the extent that the validity of such study may be otherwise lawfully extended.
SECTION 10.36.020: Regulation by traffic signals
The City Engineer is authorized to regulate the timing of traffic signals so as to permit the movement of traffic in an orderly and safe manner at speed slightly at variance from the speeds otherwise applicable within the district or at intersections, and may erect appropriate signs giving notice thereof.
SECTION 10.36.030: Speed Limits Established
Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 through 22358, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, the speed permitted by state law upon the following streets for safe operation of vehicles are as estab lished herein. The prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets herein designated when signs are erected giving notice thereof:
Declared
No. and Prima Facie
Name of Street Portion Affected Speed Limit
116 Brookhurst Street Hazard Ave. to Chapman Ave. 40 116 Brookhurst Street Chapman Ave. to Katella Ave. 45 155 Century Boulevard Garden Grove Blvd. to Euclid St. 40 159 Chapman Avenue Lewis St. to Harbor Blvd.. 45 159 Chapman Avenue Harbor Blvd. to Knott St. 40 159 Chapman Avenue Knott St. to Valley View St. 45 159 Chapman Avenue Valley View St. to Bailey St. 25
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2928
197 Dale Street Katella Ave. to Orangewood Ave. 40 197 Dale Street Orangewood Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 35
269 Euclid Street Katella Ave. to Westminster Ave. 40 318 Garden Grove Boulevard Lewis St. to Knott St. 40 329 Gilbert Street Katella Ave. to Orangewood Ave. 40 329 Gilbert Street Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave. 35 329 Gilbert Street Chapman Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 30 354 Harbor Boulevard Wilken Wy. to Westminster Ave. 40 360 Haster Street Simmons Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 40 363 Hazard Avenue Euclid St. to Cork St. 40
465 Knott Street Patterson Dr. to Garden Grove Blvd. 40 466 Lampson Avenue Lewis St. to Dale St. 35
466 Lampson Avenue Dale St. to Valley View St. 40 466 Lampson Avenue Valley View St. to Manley St. 45 531 Magnolia Street Katella Ave. to Westminster Ave. 40 533.10 Main Street College St. to Garden Grove Blvd. 25 607 Nelson Street Garden Grove Blvd. to Stanford Ave. 35 610 Newhope Street Garden Grove Blvd. to Trask Ave. 35 610 Newhope Street Trask Ave. to Westminster Ave. 40 611 Newland Street Garden Grove Blvd. to Westminster Ave. 40 616 Ninth Street Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave. 40 616 Ninth Street Chapman Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 35 618 Nutwood Avenue Chapman Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 35 637 Orangewood Avenue Eugene St. to West St. 40
637 Orangewood Avenue West St. to Gilbert St. 35 637 Orangewood Avenue Gilbert St. to Knott St. 40 816.6 Springdale Street Garden Grove Blvd. to Santa Catalina Ave. 40 Taft Street Westminster Ave. to Century Blvd. 35
866 Trask Avenue Fairview St. to Harbor Blvd. 35 866 Trask Avenue Harbor Blvd.to Beach Blvd. 40
Ward Street Hazard Ave. to Morningside Dr. 35
932 West Street Ricky Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 40 933 Western Avenue Lincoln Wy. to Orangewood Ave. 40 933 Western Avenue Orangewood Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 45 935 Westminster Avenue Buena St. to Bushard St. 45 935 Westminster Avenue Bushard St. to Newland St. 40 890 Valley View Street Santa Catalina Ave. to Garden Grove Blvd. 45
Section 2. City Clerk Certification and Publication. The City Clerk shall certify t o the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance to be published as required by law.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, h eld to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of
Garden Grove City Council
Ordinance No. 2928
the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after passage.
The foregoing Ordinance was passed by the City Council of the City of Garden Grove on the ___ day of ______.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS:
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE )
I, TERESA POMEROY, City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced for first reading an d passed to second reading on December 14, 2021, with a vote as follows:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (7) BRIETIGAM, O’NEILL, NGUYEN D., BUI, KLOPFENSTEIN, NGUYEN K., JONES
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (0) NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: (0) NONE
Agenda Item - 6.a.
City of Garden Grove
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor and City Council From: Council Members Kim
Nguyen and George
Brietigam
Dept.: Dept.:
Subject: Discussion regarding
adjusting the City Council's
salary as authorized by
California law based on
Garden Grove's population,
as requested by Council
Member Kim Nguyen and
Council Member George
Brietigam.
Date: 1/11/2022
Attached is a survey completed in November 2021, listing the base pay for Mayor/City Council Members serving in Orange County.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Upload
Date Type File Name
Mayor and
Council
Member
Compensation
Survey
1/3/2022 Backup
Material
1-11-
22_2021_Orange_County_Mayor_and_Council_Compensation_Survey.11.18.21.pdf
ORANGE COUNTY CITIES COUNCIL MEMBERS/ELECTED MAYORS COMPENSATION SURVEY NOVEMBER 2021
1 CITY
POPULATION
COUNCIL
MEMBER
MONTHLY
BASE PAY
ELECTED
MAYOR
MONTHLY
BASE PAY*
EFFECTIVE
YEAR
CAFETERIA/
HEALTH
AUTO
ALISO VIEJO 50,887 $520 N/A 2022 Yes
ANAHEIM 346,824 $1,500 $1,500 2017 Yes $300
BREA 47,325 $680.69 N/A 2005 No
BUENA PARK 81,788 $1,285 N/A 2018 No $300
COSTA MESA 111,918 $904.40 $904.40 2009 Yes
CYPRESS 50,151 $832 N/A 2010 Yes
DANA POINT 33,577 $719 N/A 2020 No $275
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 57,047 $500 N/A 2012 No
FULLERTON 138,632 $750 N/A 2006 Yes
GARDEN GROVE 171,949 $486 $600 1988 Yes $200
HUNTINGTON BEACH 199,223 $1,512 $2,121 2021 Yes
IRVINE 307,670 $880 $880 2010 Yes $715
LA HABRA 60,513 $500 N/A 1999 No
LA PALMA 15,581 $300 N/A 1975 No
LAGUNA BEACH 22,827 $908 N/A 2018 No
LAGUNA HILLS 31,374 $623.66 N/A 2020 No
LAGUNA NIGUEL 66,385 $400 N/A 1989 No
LAGUNA WOODS 17,644 $300 N/A 1999 No
LAKE FOREST 85,531 $704 N/A 2008 No
LOS ALAMITOS 11,780 $400 N/A 2009 No
MISSION VIEJO 94,381 $1,000 N/A 2017 Yes
NEWPORT BEACH 85,239 $1,491.30 $2,116 2021 No
ORANGE 139,911 $600 N/A 2022 No
PLACENTIA 51,233 $150 N/A 1980 No
RANCHO SANTA
MARGARITA
47,949 $463.50 N/A 2005 Yes
SAN CLEMENTE 64,293 $400 N/A 1998 No
SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO
35,196 $300 N/A 1986 Yes
SANTA ANA 310,227 $1,000 $1,000 2020 Yes $500
SEAL BEACH 25,242 $600 N/A 2014 No
STANTON 37,962 $850 N/A 2009 No
TUSTIN 80,276 $600 N/A 2022 No
VILLA PARK 5,843 $0.00 N/A No
WESTMINSTER 90,911 $850.50 $950.50 2008 Yes
YORBA LINDA 68,336 $500 N/A 2017 No $100
*Rotational Mayor compensation reflected under Council Member monthly base pay column.
Sources include: U.S. Census Bureau Data as of April 1, 2020; OC City Clerks; Municipal Codes; City Human Resources.
Garden Grove City Clerk’s Office/November 18, 2021