Garden Grove City Council
July 12, 2022

AGENDA
Garden Grove City
Council
Tuesday, July 12, 2022
6:30 PM
Community Meeting
Center 11300 Stanford
Avenue Garden Grove
California 92840
Steve Jones
Mayor
Diedre Thu-Ha Nguyen
Mayor Pro Tem - District 3
George S. Brietigam
Council Member - District 1
John R. O'Neill
Council Member - District 2
Patrick Phat Bui
Council Member - District 4
Stephanie Klopfenstein
Council Member - District 5
Kim B. Nguyen
Council Member - District 6
COVID-19 Information : Members of the public can address the City Council during the public comment portion of the meeting in person or via e-mail. If you plan to attend the meeting in person, masks or face coverings are required to be worn if you are not vaccinated. If you feel ill or are showing symptoms of COVID-19, please consider submitting comments by e-mail. Instructions are available on the City's website at https://ggcity.org/city-council/meetings-participation

Meeting Assistance
: Any person requiring auxiliary aids and services, due to a disability, to address the City Council, should contact the City Clerk's Office 72 hours prior to the meeting to arrange for accommodations. Phone: (714) 741-5040.

Agenda Item Descriptions
: Are intended to give a brief, general description of the item. The City Council may take legislative action deemed appropriate with respect to the item and is not limited to the recommended action indicated in staff reports or the agenda.

Documents/Writings
: Any revised or additional documents/writings related to an item on the agenda distributed to all or a majority of the Council Members within 72 hours of a meeting, are made available for public inspection at the same time (1) in the City Clerk's Office at 11222 Acacia Parkway, Garden Grove, CA 92840, during normal business hours; (2) on the City's website as an attachment to the City Council meeting agenda; and (3) at the Council Chamber at the time of the meeting.

Public Comments
: Members of the public who attend the meeting in-person and would like to address the City Council are requested to complete a pink speaker card indicating their name and address, and identifying the subject matter they wish to address. This card should be given to the City Clerk before the meeting begins. General comments are made during "Oral Communications" and should be limited to matters under consideration and/or what the City Council has jurisdiction over.

Persons wishing to address the City Council regarding a Public Hearing matter will be called to the podium at the time the matter is being considered.

Manner of Addressing the City Council
: After being called by the Mayor, you may approach the podium, it is requested that you state your name for the record, and proceed to address the City Council. All remarks and questions should be addressed to the City Council as a whole and not to individual Council Members or staff members. Any person making impertinent, slanderous, or profane

GARDEN GROVE
remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the City Council shall be called to order by the Mayor.If such conduct continues, the Mayor may order the person barred from addressing the City Council any further during that meeting.

Time Limitation: When any group of persons wishes to address the City Council on the same subject matter, the Mayor may request a spokesperson be chosen to represent the group, so as to avoid unnecessary repetition.At the City Council's discretion, a limit on the total amount of time for public comments during Oral Communications and/or a further limit on the time allotted to each speaker during Oral Communications may be set.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING.

AGENDA

ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBER BRIETIGAM, COUNCIL MEMBER

O'NEILL, COUNCIL MEMBER BUI, COUNCIL MEMBER KLOPFENSTEIN, COUNCIL MEMBER K. NGUYEN, MAYOR PRO TEM D. NGUYEN , MAYOR JONES

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA

1. PRESENTATIONS

1.a. Community Spotlight recognizing the Garden Grove Strawberry Festival Association for organizing the 2022 Garden Grove Strawberry Festival.

1.b. Community Spotlight honoring Mark Mahoney and Sue Jeanette Tallmon for being named 2022 Strawberry Ball King and
Queen/Senior Volunteer Man and Woman of the Year.

2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (to be held simultaneously with other legislative bodies)
RECESS

CONDUCT OTHER LEGISLATIVE BODIES' BUSINESS

RECONVENE

3. CONSENT ITEMS
(Consent Items will be acted on simultaneously with one motion unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Council Member .)

3.a. Adoption of a Proclamation recognizing Mark Mahoney and Sue Jeanette Tallmon for being named 2022 Strawberry Ball King and Queen/Senior Volunteer Man and Woman of the Year. ( Action Item)

3.b. Acceptance of Project No. 2163101280 Revised - Garden Grove

Park Improvements at 9301 Westminster Boulevard, Garden Grove, as complete. ( Action Item)

3.c. Receive and file warrants. ( Action Item)

3.d. Approval to waive full reading of ordinances listed. ( Action Item)

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Motion to approve will include adoption of each Resolution unless otherwise stated.)

4.a. Approval of the 2022 Drinking Water Public Health Goal Report. (Action Item)

4.b. Adoption of a Resolution amending certain user fees for cost recovery. (Action Item)

5. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

5.a. Award a contract to Select Electric, Inc., for the construction of Project No. 02-2022, Main Street Electrical Project. (Cost:
$379,871) (Action Item)

5.b. Award a contract to Project Finance Advisory, Limited for the P3 Project Feasibility and Project Management consultant services for the Garden Grove Civic Center Project. (Cost: $181,448.00) (Action Item)

5.c. Approval of a Commercial Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions with KJ Investments Group LLC for property located at 11277 Garden Grove Boulevard. (Cost: $8,049,000) ( Action Item)

5.d. Introduction and first reading of an ordinance reauthorizing the public, educational, and governmental fee on state video franchisees operating within the City of Garden Grove
Entitled:

An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Garden Grove reauthorizing the public, educational, and Governmental Fee on State Video Franchisees operating within the City of Garden Grove. (Action Item)

6. MATTERS FROM THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND CITY

MANAGER

6.a. Discussion regarding establishing a Garden Grove film incentive program in partnership with the Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce and Garden Grove Tourism Improvement District, as requested by Council Member Kim Nguyen.

6.b. Discussion about advancement of a future Navigation Center as requested by City Manager Stiles.

7. ADJOURNMENT

The next Regular City Council Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 26, 2022, at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, 92840.

Happy Early Birthday to Council Member Kim Nguyen!

Agenda Item - 3.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: From:

Dept.: Dept.:

Subject: Adoption of a Proclamation
recognizing Mark Mahoney
and Sue Jeanette Tallmon for
being named 2022
Strawberry Ball King and
Queen/Senior Volunteer Man
and Woman of the Year.
(Action Item)
Date:

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Proclamation 7/6/2022 Proclamation King_and_Queen_Proclamation.pdf

Proclamation
Mark Mahoney and Sue Jeanette Tallmon
2022 Garden Grove Strawberry Ball King and Queen
Senior Volunteer Man and Woman of the Year
WHEREAS, The H. Louis Lake Senior Center named Mark Mahoney and Sue Jeanette Tallmon as the 2022 Garden Grove Strawberry Ball King and Queen, and Senior Volunteer Man and Woman of the Year for their spirit of service; and
WHEREAS, Mark Mahoney was born in Orange, California, and has been a resident of Garden Grove for many years. After retiring as an accountant, Mark has dedicated his time to volunteer and help the Garden Grove community; and
WHEREAS, Mark has been a member of the Garden Grove Elks Lodge #1952 for 30 years and held a position as exalted ruler from 2017 to 2018. He has also been a member of the Garden Grove Strawberry Festival Association for 20 years and held a position as president in 2013; and WHEREAS, Sue Jeanette Tallmon, originally from Stewart County, Tennessee, has been a resident of Garden Grove for 54 years. She worked for the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a file clerk and the City of Anaheim at the Anaheim Convention Center; and
WHEREAS, Sue spends her free time volunteering and providing service to her community. She has been an active volunteer with the Garden Grove Moose Lodge #620; the Fleet Reserve Association; and the H. Louis Lake Senior Center; and
WHEREAS, Mark Mahoney and Sue Jeanette Tallmon’s service to the City and community of Garden Grove goes beyond words, and is further exemplified by their selection as the 2022 Garden Grove Strawberry Ball King and Queen, and Senior Volunteer Man and Woman of the Year.

NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Garden Grove City Council do hereby proclaim Mark Mahoney and Sue Jeanette Tallmon as the 2022 Garden Grove Strawberry Ball King and Queen, and Senior Volunteer Man and Woman of the Year.

July 12, 2022

Agenda Item - 3.b.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: John Montanchez
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community Services
Subject: Acceptance of Project No.
2163101280 Revised - Garden
Grove Park Improvements at
9301 Westminster Boulevard,
Garden Grove, as complete.
(Action Item)
Date: 7/12/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to accept Project No. 2163101280 - Garden Grove Park Improvements Revised at 9301 Westminster Boulevard, Garden Grove, as complete.

BACKGROUND
On November 24, 2020, the City Council awarded a contract to Land Forms Landscape Construction, Inc., in the amount of $750,321 to complete the scope of work that included the demolition of the large picnic pavilion and the three small picnic shelters, and the construction of ADA accessible sidewalks, slabs, new picnic pavilion, three new picnic shelters, tables, benches, barbeque grills, and electrical improvements that will allow for additional security lighting.

DISCUSSION
The contractor, Land Forms Landscape Construction, Inc., has completed the Garden Grove Park Improvements project in accordance with the plans, specifications, and other contract documents.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact to the General Fund. The Project was completed within budget and funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Citywide Park Fee funds. The retention payments will be released after recordation of the Notice of Completion.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Accept Project No. 2163101280 - Garden Grove Park Improvements Revised at

Accept Project No. 2163101280 - Garden Grove Park Improvements Revised at 9301 Westminster Boulevard, Garden Grove, as complete;

Authorize the City Manager to execute the Notice of Completion of Public Works Improvement and Work; and

Authorize the Finance Director to release the retention payment when appropriate to do so.

By: Janet Pelayo, Community Services Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload
Date Type File Name
Notice of
Completion 7/6/2022 Notice 7.12.22_Notice_of_Completion_Project_2163101280_GG_Park_Improvement_Revised.pdf

•
•
•

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

When Recorded Mail To:

City Clerk
City of Garden Grove
P. O. Box 3070
Garden Grove, CA 92842

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND WORK

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that The City of Garden Grove, Orange County, California, has caused a public improvement, to wit:

PROJECT NO. 2163101280

GARDEN GROVE PARK IMPROVEMENT REVISED

to be constructed upon the property hereinafter described. The contract for furnishing of all plant, labor, services, materials, and equipment, and all utilities and transportation, including power, fuel, and water, and performing all work necessary to construct and complete, in a good and workmanlike manner in strict accordance with the specifications, plans, and drawings therefore on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove, for the construction, installation and completion of the above-described public improvement and work, was heretofore made and entered into with Land Forms Landscape Construction, Inc., on the 24th day of November, 2020, and filed for record in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Garden Grove; that the work upon said public improvement has been completed, and that the Project Manager has notified the City Council that he/she has made and completed a final inspection of the materials furnished and installed and the work performed in the construction, installation, and completion of said public improvement hereinabove more particularly described and set forth, and has certified in writing to the City Council that all the provisions of the contract and contract documents for the furnishing of all plant, labor, services, materials, and equipment, and the performing of all work necessary for the construction, installation, and completion of said public improvement above described have been fully complied with to his satisfaction as required by the contract document; that final acceptance of the construction, installation, and completion of said public improvement above described was made on the 12th day of JULY , 2022; that the nature of the title to said property of said City of Garden Grove is as follows:

That is to say, it owns said public improvement in fee except the right-of-way upon which it is constructed, and that it owns an easement upon, over, and along said right- of-way for the purpose of the construction, installation, and completion of said public improvement herein above described and the use thereof after said completion; that the property herein above referred to and on which said public improvement is situated is described as follows, to wit:

PROJECT NO. 2163101280

GARDEN GROVE PARK IMPROVEMENT REVISED

NAME OF SURETY on Labor and Material Bond is: United States Fire Insurance Company 151 Kalmus Drive, Suite A201
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel No. (714) 546-5100

DATED this day of 20

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

By
City Manager
City of Garden Grove
ATTEST:

City Clerk
City of Garden Grove

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE

I am the Project Manager for Project No. 2163101280.

I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion of Public Improvement and Work, and know the contents thereof; and I certify that the same is true of my own knowledge, except as to those matters, which are therein stated upon my information or belief, and as to those matters I believe to be true.

I certify (or declare), under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on July 12, 2022 at Garden Grove , California
(Date) (Place)

Janet Pelayo – Project Manager
Community Services Manager

Agenda Item - 3.c.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Patricia Song
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Finance
Subject: Receive and file warrants.
(Action Item)
Date: 7/12/2022
Attached are the warrants recommended to be received and filed.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Warrants 7/6/2022 Warrants 22.06.24_Payroll_Warrant_Register.pdf

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 1
EF - Payroll EFT
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008322 E03973 AVILA, VERONICA 06/30/2022 $2,428.26 00008323 E04755 BRIETIGAM III, GEORGE S 06/30/2022 $262.05 00008324 E04332 BUI, PHAT T 06/30/2022 $573.61 00008325 E01338 CARRENO, SHAUNA J 06/30/2022 $2,033.54 00008326 E02788 DAVIS, JEFFREY P 06/30/2022 $1,628.85 00008327 E00803 HADDAD, PAMELA M 06/30/2022 $2,853.82 00008328 E04750 HO, VY D 06/30/2022 $1,788.99 00008329 E04096 HUYNH, DANNY 06/30/2022 $4,090.90 00008330 E03612 JONES, STEVEN R 06/30/2022 $205.65 00008331 E04131 KIM, NOELLE N 06/30/2022 $2,498.00 00008332 E02612 KLOESS, VILMA C 06/30/2022 $2,669.05 00008333 E04536 KLOPFENSTEIN, STEPHANIE L 06/30/2022 $78.26 00008334 E01949 LE, IVY 06/30/2022 $3,281.44 00008335 E01280 LE, TAMMY 06/30/2022 $1,642.60 00008336 E05828 MIDDENDORF, LINDA 06/30/2022 $3,066.37 00008337 E02787 MORAN, MARIE L 06/30/2022 $2,645.29 00008338 E02539 NAVARRO, MARIA A 06/30/2022 $2,550.37 00008339 E04535 NGUYEN, DIEDRE THU HA 06/30/2022 $277.59 00008340 E04948 NGUYEN, HOAI THUONG H 06/30/2022 $1,437.80 00008341 E04537 NGUYEN, KIM B 06/30/2022 $281.98 00008342 E03255 NGUYEN, PHUONG VIEN T 06/30/2022 $2,171.63 00008343 E02560 NGUYEN, QUANG 06/30/2022 $2,524.37 00008344 E01286 NGUYEN, TINA T 06/30/2022 $2,033.48 00008345 E04534 ONEILL, JOHN R 06/30/2022 $295.82 00008346 E04528 PARK, SHAWN S 06/30/2022 $2,564.55 00008347 E03541 PHI, THYANA T 06/30/2022 $2,768.49 00008348 E04443 POLLOCK, AMANDA M 06/30/2022 $1,862.93 00008349 E06945 POMEROY, TERESA L 06/30/2022 $3,565.41 00008350 E01964 PULIDO, ANA E 06/30/2022 $4,019.96 00008351 E01356 RAMOS, MARIA 06/30/2022 $2,449.79 00008352 E04387 STILES, SCOTT C 06/30/2022 $5,616.12 00008353 E00564 STIPE, MARIA A 06/30/2022 $5,656.44 00008354 E03715 THAI, KRISTY H 06/30/2022 $2,426.76 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 2
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008355 E02543 TO, TANYA L 06/30/2022 $1,503.12 00008356 E01971 TRAN, CUONG K 06/30/2022 $2,285.57 00008357 E02056 TRUONG, ELAINE 06/30/2022 $1,689.80 00008358 E03983 VASQUEZ, LIZABETH C 06/30/2022 $3,890.88 00008359 E04971 VITAL, ANDREA 06/30/2022 $1,637.51 00008360 E02562 VO, THANH-NGUYEN 06/30/2022 $2,276.65 00008361 E04944 ANDERSON CAMBA, ASHLEIGH R 06/30/2022 $2,061.83 00008362 E04764 BRADLEY, JANNA K 06/30/2022 $2,599.88 00008363 E03766 CERDA, MARY C 06/30/2022 $2,145.87 00008364 E04673 HART, BRANDI M 06/30/2022 $698.32 00008365 E04363 KWAN, LIANE Y 06/30/2022 $5,172.48 00008366 E01985 LEE, JANY H 06/30/2022 $5,686.92 00008367 E05007 NGUYEN, LE V 06/30/2022 $1,021.76 00008368 E03420 PROCTOR, SHERRILL A 06/30/2022 $2,409.07 00008369 E04726 RICHARDS, STEPHANIE E 06/30/2022 $2,086.09 00008370 E04417 STEPHENSON, CAITLYN M 06/30/2022 $2,586.40 00008371 E02115 STOVER, LAURA J 06/30/2022 $5,615.41 00008372 E04445 BROWN, KAREN J 06/30/2022 $1,162.16 00008373 E03313 BUI, AI N 06/30/2022 $1,659.70 00008374 E04961 CHAO, VICTORIA 06/30/2022 $1,480.62 00008375 E03686 CHAVEZ, JAIME F 06/30/2022 $1,739.13 00008376 E03760 CHUNG, JANET J 06/30/2022 $3,466.94 00008377 E04957 CURTSEIT, MARIA 06/30/2022 $1,766.35 00008378 E04960 FUKAZAWA, KEISUKE 06/30/2022 $1,630.90 00008379 E03134 GARCIA, SYLVIA 06/30/2022 $851.04 00008380 E03429 GULLEY, SUSAN J 06/30/2022 $309.05 00008381 E03016 HERNANDEZ, GARY F 06/30/2022 $1,798.54 00008382 E04569 HOFFMAN, CORINNE L 06/30/2022 $2,426.29 00008383 E04968 HONG, SEUNGBUM 06/30/2022 $1,658.63 00008384 E04959 LE, KENNETH H 06/30/2022 $1,338.24 00008385 E00057 MANALANSAN, NEAL M 06/30/2022 $2,054.95 00008386 E01668 MAY, ROBERT W 06/30/2022 $1,620.06 00008387 E01393 MENDEZ, ANGELA M 06/30/2022 $1,918.98 00008388 E03628 MENDOZA, CHRISTI C 06/30/2022 $2,184.90 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 3
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008389 E04958 NGO, TINA 06/30/2022 $2,478.53 00008390 E04838 NIGATU, SELAMAWIT 06/30/2022 $2,207.63 00008391 E01362 PETERSON, JENNIFER L 06/30/2022 $1,984.03 00008392 E02429 PHAM, ANH 06/30/2022 $1,663.95 00008393 E03610 RAMIREZ, EVA 06/30/2022 $2,031.76 00008394 E05008 RAMOS, ASHLEY 06/30/2022 $1,087.32 00008395 E04973 RAMOS, NANCY 06/30/2022 $2,722.66 00008396 E04993 RESHMIN, TRISHITA 06/30/2022 $888.50 00008397 E03539 SEGAWA, SANDRA E 06/30/2022 $3,665.31 00008398 E04780 SONG, YUAN 06/30/2022 $5,226.14 00008399 E04859 VO, MY TRA 06/30/2022 $2,496.06 00008400 E03433 WESTON, RETA J 06/30/2022 $1,224.74 00008401 E04674 WHITTAKER DEGEN, HELEN E 06/30/2022 $549.05 00008402 E04527 YOO, MEENA 06/30/2022 $2,293.29 00008403 E04493 ANDREWS, STEVEN F 06/30/2022 $2,409.81 00008404 E00845 CHANG, TERENCE S 06/30/2022 $2,836.43 00008405 E03498 ESPINOZA, VERNA L 06/30/2022 $2,619.95 00008406 E04523 GALLO, CESAR 06/30/2022 $3,069.86 00008407 E04415 GOLD, ANNA L 06/30/2022 $2,031.33 00008408 E04713 HINGCO, ERNIE E 06/30/2022 $2,027.00 00008409 E02617 KLOESS, GEOFFREY A 06/30/2022 $3,818.93 00008410 E03571 MORAGRAAN, RACHOT 06/30/2022 $4,044.16 00008411 E01277 PROFFITT, NOEL J 06/30/2022 $3,199.15 00008412 E01901 RAO, ANAND V 06/30/2022 $5,055.96 00008413 E03384 SCHULZE, KATRENA J 06/30/2022 $2,480.21 00008414 E04395 SWANSON, MATTHEW T 06/30/2022 $1,917.43 00008415 E01674 VALENZUELA, ANTHONY 06/30/2022 $1,620.06 00008416 E00809 VICTORIA, ROD T 06/30/2022 $2,143.44 00008417 E03014 WILDER, CANDY G 06/30/2022 $2,122.37 00008418 E03509 WINSTON, TERREL KEITH 06/30/2022 $3,158.90 00008419 E03725 ABU HAMDIYYAH, AMEENAH 06/30/2022 $2,068.60 00008420 E02996 ASHLEIGH, JULIE A 06/30/2022 $2,017.76 00008421 E03161 AUSTIN, MICHAEL G 06/30/2022 $2,734.05 00008422 E00740 BLODGETT, GREG 06/30/2022 $3,846.71 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 4
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008423 E03808 CHENG, ALANA R 06/30/2022 $2,840.70 00008424 E03601 CHUNG, CHRISTOPHER 06/30/2022 $2,720.82 00008425 E03353 COVARRUBIAS, MONICA 06/30/2022 $3,573.45 00008426 E00128 CRAMER, RITA M 06/30/2022 $2,449.39 00008427 E04394 DAHLHEIMER, BRYSON T 06/30/2022 $2,275.44 00008428 E04879 DAKE, RYAN J 06/30/2022 $2,402.23 00008429 E04578 DENT, DAVID A 06/30/2022 $4,473.95 00008430 E03697 GUERRERO, PAUL 06/30/2022 $2,776.68 00008431 E03600 HARTWIG, TODD C 06/30/2022 $2,768.34 00008432 E03531 HERNANDEZ, RALPH V 06/30/2022 $2,292.59 00008433 E04855 HERRERA JR, ARMANDO 06/30/2022 $298.20 00008434 E03410 HODSON, AARON J 06/30/2022 $2,281.31 00008435 E04716 KASKLA, PRIIT J 06/30/2022 $2,085.22 00008436 E04442 KIM, LISA L 06/30/2022 $5,047.69 00008437 E03617 LEE, GRACE E 06/30/2022 $2,545.80 00008438 E04490 LY, HUONG Q 06/30/2022 $2,209.87 00008439 E03412 MARINO, LEE W 06/30/2022 $4,488.57 00008440 E04194 MARTINEZ, MARIA L 06/30/2022 $2,479.79 00008441 E03044 MOORE, JUDITH A 06/30/2022 $2,111.47 00008442 E02895 MOURE, SVETLANA 06/30/2022 $2,323.21 00008443 E04635 NGUYEN, PHU T 06/30/2022 $3,848.41 00008444 E02842 PARRA, MARIA C 06/30/2022 $3,182.29 00008445 E04894 REFUERZO JR., ORLINO CAMPOS 06/30/2022 $588.71 00008446 E04992 ROBLES, ALFONSO 06/30/2022 $2,398.51 00008447 E04408 THRONE, TIMOTHY E 06/30/2022 $4,325.30 00008448 E04862 TRAN, JAKE P 06/30/2022 $1,771.97 00008449 E03643 ALVARADO, YOLANDA A 06/30/2022 $1,685.67 00008450 E05009 ALVAREZ, CYNTHIA 06/30/2022 $378.47 00008451 E04390 AMBRIZ, STEPHANIE 06/30/2022 $995.16 00008452 E04978 AVINA, MIKAYLA M 06/30/2022 $590.67 00008453 E04771 BAILOR, REBECCA J 06/30/2022 $440.20 00008454 E04247 BAIRD, JOSHUA O 06/30/2022 $76.03 00008455 E04988 BAUTISTA, BRENDA 06/30/2022 $1,934.68 00008456 E04262 BEARD, ALEX C 06/30/2022 $1,503.70 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 5
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008457 E04929 BENITEZ, LIZBETH 06/30/2022 $311.71 00008458 E02658 CAMARENA, RACHEL M 06/30/2022 $2,201.56 00008459 E01588 CAMARENA, RENE 06/30/2022 $2,196.31 00008460 E01902 CASILLAS, VICTORIA M 06/30/2022 $1,916.16 00008461 E04949 CEDILLO PADILLA, JESSICA 06/30/2022 $816.53 00008462 E04611 CROSS, AMANDA D 06/30/2022 $1,853.22 00008463 E04814 DE ROSAS, VICTOR 06/30/2022 $520.65 00008464 E04688 DELGADO CHAVEZ, MARLY 06/30/2022 $136.85 00008465 E04653 DIAZ, GABRIELA 06/30/2022 $575.83 00008466 E04794 DINH, AARON D 06/30/2022 $393.85 00008467 E04791 DOWNS, KELDEN A 06/30/2022 $890.30 00008468 E02120 FRAUSTO, LUIZ F 06/30/2022 $150.31 00008469 E04679 FREEMAN, MARK C 06/30/2022 $3,513.01 00008470 E04481 GARCIA, JARED D 06/30/2022 $377.31 00008471 E04253 GARCIA, VANESSA L 06/30/2022 $566.19 00008472 E03337 GODDARD, JENNIFER DANIELLE 06/30/2022 $2,677.18 00008473 E03877 GOMEZ, STEVEN E 06/30/2022 $835.33 00008474 E00940 GRANT, JACOB R 06/30/2022 $2,465.02 00008475 E04967 HASHEMI, SETAREH 06/30/2022 $307.92 00008476 E01687 HOLER, KIMBERLY K 06/30/2022 $460.12 00008477 E04171 KONRAD, JOHN C 06/30/2022 $124.56 00008478 E04682 LOPEZ, KALYSTA N 06/30/2022 $736.36 00008479 E03603 MA AE, ELAINE M 06/30/2022 $2,944.86 00008480 E05014 MARIN, AMANDA T 06/30/2022 $712.53 00008481 E01552 MEDINA, JESUS 06/30/2022 $1,808.38 00008482 E00455 MEDINA, JUAN 06/30/2022 $2,262.63 00008483 E04925 MENDOZA, JESSICA 06/30/2022 $1,003.86 00008484 E02808 MONTANCHEZ, JOHN A 06/30/2022 $5,475.08 00008485 E05022 MUNOZ, JULIANNE I 06/30/2022 $603.97 00008486 E04173 NAKAISHI, KIRSTEN K 06/30/2022 $498.68 00008487 E04947 NGUYEN, ALEXANDER H 06/30/2022 $696.36 00008488 E04603 NGUYEN, ALLEN T 06/30/2022 $159.66 00008489 E04391 NICHOLAS, NOEL N 06/30/2022 $1,540.98 00008490 E04931 NODAL, NATALIE 06/30/2022 $627.05 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 6
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008491 E00785 OCADIZ HERNANDEZ, GABRIELA 06/30/2022 $5,328.28 00008492 E04965 ORDUNO, SAMANTHA 06/30/2022 $456.71 00008493 E03881 PANGAN, CHRISTIAN 06/30/2022 $177.56 00008494 E04819 PARK, JAMES S 06/30/2022 $221.64 00008495 E03361 PELAYO, JANET E 06/30/2022 $3,776.33 00008496 E04777 PHAN, EDOUARD T 06/30/2022 $464.35 00008497 E03893 PICKRELL, ARIELLE 06/30/2022 $1,699.00 00008498 E04463 PUAILOA, SHADY S 06/30/2022 $247.09 00008499 E04932 RAYO, ALONDRA 06/30/2022 $1,033.79 00008500 E02754 REYNOSO, SUGEIRY 06/30/2022 $2,411.88 00008501 E04646 RIVERA, CATIA J 06/30/2022 $110.72 00008502 E03362 ROMERO, MARINA Y 06/30/2022 $1,658.39 00008503 E04684 ROSALES, MARIA D 06/30/2022 $481.19 00008504 E04614 ROSAS, TANYA 06/30/2022 $326.91 00008505 E04933 ROSAS, VANESSA 06/30/2022 $654.09 00008506 E05025 SABGA, INGRID D 06/30/2022 $937.46 00008507 E04620 SALDIVAR, DIANA 06/30/2022 $586.69 00008508 E01893 SAUCEDO, DANA MARIE 06/30/2022 $1,592.25 00008509 E00925 SCHLUMPBERGER, EMERON J 06/30/2022 $1,040.26 00008510 E04926 SERNA, SAMANTHA M 06/30/2022 $980.08 00008511 E05016 SIERRA, AILEEN S 06/30/2022 $528.50 00008512 E04795 SIEVE, MYCHAELLA J 06/30/2022 $604.45 00008513 E04927 SINGER, LAUREN ROSE EMIKO N 06/30/2022 $911.85 00008514 E03895 SMITH, REBECCA S 06/30/2022 $288.90 00008515 E04798 TANG, ETHAN 06/30/2022 $647.55 00008516 E05030 TRIGGS, MARY SHANNON 06/30/2022 $1,739.33 00008517 E04924 TU, KATHY 06/30/2022 $503.64 00008518 E01396 VALDIVIA, CLAUDIA 06/30/2022 $3,237.99 00008519 E00015 VAN SICKLE, JEFFREY 06/30/2022 $2,497.11 00008520 E04687 VARGAS, SAMANTHA B 06/30/2022 $631.10 00008521 E05017 VARGAS-SERNA, KELLY 06/30/2022 $787.70 00008522 E04118 VENCES, DAISY O 06/30/2022 $144.45 00008523 E04478 VENCES, JOSHUA 06/30/2022 $550.53 00008524 E03085 VICTORIA, PAUL E 06/30/2022 $827.93 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 7
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008525 E05018 VILLEGAS, MIA A 06/30/2022 $770.11 00008526 E04609 VIRAMONTES, JACOB D 06/30/2022 $124.56 00008527 E04937 VO, ADRIAN K 06/30/2022 $660.58 00008528 E04274 WILMES, DAVID M 06/30/2022 $502.02 00008529 E04734 ACOSTA, GIOVANNI 06/30/2022 $2,414.14 00008530 E03819 ALAMILLO, MARCOS R 06/30/2022 $5,006.14 00008531 E03712 ALARCON, CLAUDIA 06/30/2022 $7,587.88 00008532 E03616 ALCARAZ, MARIA A 06/30/2022 $2,050.80 00008533 E00121 ALLISON, WILLIAM 06/30/2022 $5,004.03 00008534 E04873 ALVARADO, MADELINE M 06/30/2022 $1,853.44 00008535 E04080 ALVAREZ BROWN, RICHARD A 06/30/2022 $3,167.47 00008536 E03011 ANDERSON, BOBBY B 06/30/2022 $3,330.20 00008537 E01234 ARELLANO, PEDRO R 06/30/2022 $4,181.38 00008538 E04875 ARROYO, SANDRA M 06/30/2022 $1,987.19 00008539 E04497 ASHBAUGH, TIMOTHY R 06/30/2022 $2,861.43 00008540 E03397 ASHBY, PAUL W 06/30/2022 $3,533.08 00008541 E04719 ATWOOD, MARIA S 06/30/2022 $2,038.80 00008542 E04613 AVALOS JR, FRANCISCO 06/30/2022 $2,852.60 00008543 E04550 BAEK, SHARON S 06/30/2022 $2,178.62 00008544 E04209 BAINTO, JUDY A 06/30/2022 $538.85 00008545 E04778 BAKER, COLLIN E 06/30/2022 $4,282.39 00008546 E03005 BANKSON, JOHN F 06/30/2022 $4,058.90 00008547 E04645 BARRAZA, RENE 06/30/2022 $3,336.00 00008548 E04432 BEHZAD, JOSHUA K 06/30/2022 $2,439.06 00008549 E04951 BELLO, ANGELICA 06/30/2022 $1,578.14 00008550 E04976 BELTHIUS, TYLER E 06/30/2022 $497.42 00008551 E04753 BERENGER, BEAU A 06/30/2022 $3,472.52 00008552 E03296 BERESFORD, EVAN S 06/30/2022 $3,504.07 00008553 E01604 BERLETH, RYAN S 06/30/2022 $2,143.76 00008554 E03443 BLUM, JAMES A 06/30/2022 $2,931.03 00008555 E04149 BOGUE, SUMMER A 06/30/2022 $2,480.04 00008556 E03363 BOWEN, GENA M 06/30/2022 $2,979.13 00008557 E04767 BOWMAN, TROY F 06/30/2022 $2,412.84 00008558 E04963 BOYENS III, ROBERT 06/30/2022 $3,040.89 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 8
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008559 E00946 BRAME, KAREN D 06/30/2022 $1,992.87 00008560 E04803 BRANTNER, BRITTANEE N 06/30/2022 $1,580.03 00008561 E03380 BROWN, JEFFREY A 06/30/2022 $4,539.47 00008562 E03968 BRUNICK, CARISSA L 06/30/2022 $1,567.12 00008563 E02031 BURILLO, RICHARD O 06/30/2022 $5,441.51 00008564 E03972 BUSTILLOS, RYAN V 06/30/2022 $4,442.27 00008565 E03964 CAMARA, DANIEL A 06/30/2022 $2,818.24 00008566 E04074 CAMPOS, JESENIA 06/30/2022 $2,308.79 00008567 E03739 CAPPS, THOMAS A 06/30/2022 $2,690.12 00008568 E05002 CARBALLO, MILTON A 06/30/2022 $2,367.56 00008569 E02372 CENTENO, JUAN C 06/30/2022 $6,122.31 00008570 E03607 CHANG, DAVID Y H 06/30/2022 $3,400.85 00008571 E04867 CHAPPELL, SHYLER R.D. 06/30/2022 $2,047.44 00008572 E03481 CHAURAN HAIRGROVE, TAMMY L 06/30/2022 $2,474.22 00008573 E04498 CHEATHAM, JEROME L 06/30/2022 $3,225.88 00008574 E01541 CHO, HAN J 06/30/2022 $5,036.29 00008575 E03423 CHOWDHURY, JACINTA F 06/30/2022 $1,854.87 00008576 E04414 CHUNG, RANDY G 06/30/2022 $357.30 00008577 E00003 CIBOSKY, COURTNEY P 06/30/2022 $3,128.37 00008578 E04539 CLASBY JR, BRIAN M 06/30/2022 $2,541.05 00008579 E04062 COOPMAN, AARON J 06/30/2022 $2,983.74 00008580 E04872 CORNETT, KRISTINA L 06/30/2022 $1,879.12 00008581 E04832 CORTEZ JR, DARRYL B 06/30/2022 $2,750.29 00008582 E04666 CORTEZ, JULIO C 06/30/2022 $2,885.47 00008583 E01796 COULTER, GARY L 06/30/2022 $2,917.69 00008584 E04555 CRUZ, REYNA 06/30/2022 $1,999.73 00008585 E01364 DALTON, BRIAN D 06/30/2022 $3,815.08 00008586 E04874 DANG, JOHN 06/30/2022 $668.53 00008587 E00126 DANIELEY III, CHARLIE 06/30/2022 $3,115.88 00008588 E01951 DANIELSON, PAUL E 06/30/2022 $2,002.30 00008589 E01968 DARE, THOMAS R 06/30/2022 $6,393.45 00008590 E04503 DAVILA, ISAAC 06/30/2022 $2,711.79 00008591 E04431 DE ALMEIDA LOPES, NICHOLAS A 06/30/2022 $3,488.78 00008592 E04731 DE PADUA, TANNER C 06/30/2022 $3,031.80 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 9
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008593 E03691 DELGADO JR, JUAN L 06/30/2022 $4,308.67 00008594 E03395 DIX, JENNIFER A 06/30/2022 $2,556.79 00008595 E02313 DOSCHER, RONALD A 06/30/2022 $2,349.78 00008596 E04586 DOVEAS, CHRISTOPHER C 06/30/2022 $32.81 00008597 E04281 DRISCOLL, RUSSELL B 06/30/2022 $2,438.37 00008598 E04844 DUARTE, TAYLOR M 06/30/2022 $2,361.85 00008599 E04720 DUDLEY, BROC D 06/30/2022 $2,650.40 00008600 E03625 EARLE, CHRISTOPHER M 06/30/2022 $3,355.22 00008601 E03740 EL FARRA, AMIR A 06/30/2022 $4,310.95 00008602 E03927 ELHAMI, MICHAEL K 06/30/2022 $3,943.99 00008603 E03933 ELIZONDO, BENJAMIN M 06/30/2022 $3,317.32 00008604 E04016 ELIZONDO, FLOR DE LIS 06/30/2022 $2,311.12 00008605 E01598 ELSOUSOU, HELENA 06/30/2022 $2,684.56 00008606 E02734 ESCALANTE, OTTO J 06/30/2022 $5,205.87 00008607 E04334 ESCOBEDO, JOSHUA N 06/30/2022 $3,312.57 00008608 E02724 ESTLOW, STEPHEN C 06/30/2022 $3,109.85 00008609 E04358 ESTRADA MONSANTO, MICHELLE N 06/30/2022 $2,877.23 00008610 E04748 FAJARDO, JESUS 06/30/2022 $2,475.87 00008611 E04303 FERREIRA JR, HECTOR 06/30/2022 $3,401.06 00008612 E01663 FERRIN, KORY C 06/30/2022 $4,133.41 00008613 E03976 FIGUEREDO, GEORGE R 06/30/2022 $3,225.01 00008614 E02838 FISCHER, JAMES D 06/30/2022 $702.35 00008615 E04774 FLINN, PATRICIA C 06/30/2022 $4,119.72 00008616 E02887 FOSTER, VICTORIA M 06/30/2022 $1,669.73 00008617 E04033 FRANCISCO, KATHERINE M 06/30/2022 $2,683.09 00008618 E02963 FRANKS, JAMES D 06/30/2022 $3,076.53 00008619 E04747 FRESENIUS, ROBERT D 06/30/2022 $3,369.36 00008620 E00903 FRUTOS, VERONICA 06/30/2022 $1,871.62 00008621 E04729 GARCIA, JOSEPH A 06/30/2022 $1,783.66 00008622 E03086 GARCIA, PETE 06/30/2022 $3,919.76 00008623 E03659 GARNER, AMANDA B 06/30/2022 $1,011.91 00008624 E02606 GEORGE, DAVID L 06/30/2022 $2,061.20 00008625 E04351 GERDIN, MICHAEL E 06/30/2022 $2,971.68 00008626 E04542 GIFFORD, ROBERT J 06/30/2022 $3,262.61 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 10
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008627 E04658 GIRGENTI, BRIAN C 06/30/2022 $4,090.60 00008628 E04401 GLEASON, SEAN M 06/30/2022 $2,705.74 00008629 E04917 GOMEZ, JESUS 06/30/2022 $2,152.88 00008630 E04863 GONZALEZ JR, GONZALO 06/30/2022 $3,124.50 00008631 E05003 HA, DANNY 06/30/2022 $2,945.22 00008632 E04732 HADDEN, TRAVIS J 06/30/2022 $3,467.27 00008633 E04787 HALEY, KYLE N 06/30/2022 $10,259.63 00008634 E03527 HALLER, TROY 06/30/2022 $4,898.15 00008635 E03402 HEINE, STEVEN H 06/30/2022 $3,836.22 00008636 E02469 HERRERA, JOSE D 06/30/2022 $3,860.64 00008637 E04244 HINGCO, PINKY C 06/30/2022 $2,874.19 00008638 E03713 HOLLOWAY, WILLIAM T 06/30/2022 $4,095.69 00008639 E04739 HOWARD, JASON A 06/30/2022 $5,364.61 00008640 E04654 HURLEY, KIRK P 06/30/2022 $2,293.89 00008641 E04089 HUTCHINS, DONALD J 06/30/2022 $3,737.66 00008642 E03815 HUYNH, AI KELLY 06/30/2022 $2,210.63 00008643 E03559 HUYNH, THI A 06/30/2022 $2,611.36 00008644 E04915 ITURRALDE, JENNIFER L 06/30/2022 $1,028.09 00008645 E04583 JENSEN, MICHAEL J 06/30/2022 $3,965.12 00008646 E02935 JENSEN, NICKOLAS K 06/30/2022 $3,851.31 00008647 E04587 JIMENEZ JR, EFRAIN A 06/30/2022 $3,089.96 00008648 E04781 JIMENEZ TAVAREZ, SERGIO J 06/30/2022 $2,867.73 00008649 E04655 JOHNSON, CODY M 06/30/2022 $2,917.02 00008650 E03368 JOHNSON, JASON L 06/30/2022 $4,574.54 00008651 E03831 JORDAN, GERALD F 06/30/2022 $2,944.86 00008652 E04444 JULIENNE, PATRICK R 06/30/2022 $2,847.77 00008653 E04559 KELLEY, KRISTOFER D 06/30/2022 $2,938.07 00008654 E04353 KEUILIAN, SHELBY 06/30/2022 $2,081.68 00008655 E04663 KIM, CHAD B 06/30/2022 $2,407.20 00008656 E04538 KIMBERLY, ALLYSON L 06/30/2022 $1,792.38 00008657 E03932 KIVLER, ROBERT J 06/30/2022 $2,504.58 00008658 E03389 KOLANO, JOSEPH L 06/30/2022 $2,804.80 00008659 E03294 KOVACS, LEA K 06/30/2022 $3,085.85 00008660 E05000 KOVACS, TIMOTHY M 06/30/2022 $2,719.01 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 11
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008661 E04669 KOVACS, TIMOTHY P 06/30/2022 $3,916.00 00008662 E03484 KUNKEL, PETER M 06/30/2022 $3,467.38 00008663 E04804 LADD, LAUREN M 06/30/2022 $2,105.58 00008664 E04857 LANG, MICHAEL J 06/30/2022 $3,094.02 00008665 E03511 LAZENBY, NICHOLAS A 06/30/2022 $3,197.84 00008666 E04877 LE, BAO TINH THI 06/30/2022 $1,898.17 00008667 E04021 LEE, RAPHAEL M 06/30/2022 $3,162.76 00008668 E04970 LEIVA, EDUARDO C 06/30/2022 $4,783.72 00008669 E03488 LEYVA, ERICK 06/30/2022 $4,215.07 00008670 E04541 LINK, DEREK M 06/30/2022 $3,829.10 00008671 E00030 LOERA JR, RAFAEL 06/30/2022 $4,849.61 00008672 E05033 LOFFLER, CHARLES H 06/30/2022 $3,885.82 00008673 E02645 LOPEZ, DAVID 06/30/2022 $3,520.74 00008674 E05066 LORD, MARK A 06/30/2022 $7,185.79 00008675 E04581 LOWEN, BRADLEY A 06/30/2022 $3,148.81 00008676 E04761 LUCATERO, JESSE A 06/30/2022 $2,196.22 00008677 E00027 LUKAS, STEVEN W 06/30/2022 $2,040.73 00008678 E04048 LUX, ROBERT D 06/30/2022 $2,255.42 00008679 E03663 LUX, RYAN M 06/30/2022 $3,866.17 00008680 E04772 LY, LINDALINH THU 06/30/2022 $1,631.82 00008681 E04661 MACHUCA, ROBERTO 06/30/2022 $2,828.99 00008682 E03752 MACY, TAYLOR A 06/30/2022 $3,252.75 00008683 E04532 MANIACI, GIANLUCA F 06/30/2022 $2,763.47 00008684 E04435 MARCHAND, MATTHEW P 06/30/2022 $3,154.10 00008685 E01359 MARTINEZ JR, MARIO 06/30/2022 $5,425.15 00008686 E04974 MARTINEZ, JUANITA PATRICIA 06/30/2022 $2,305.06 00008687 E02792 MATA, RAQUEL D 06/30/2022 $784.46 00008688 E04656 MAZON, JORGE L 06/30/2022 $2,557.39 00008689 E02796 MCFARLANE, MARIA C 06/30/2022 $2,076.65 00008690 E06761 MEEKS, REBECCA S 06/30/2022 $4,098.90 00008691 E03826 MEERS, BRYAN J 06/30/2022 $3,978.77 00008692 E02655 MENDOZA CAMPOS, MELISSA 06/30/2022 $2,242.98 00008693 E04402 MERRILL, KENNETH E 06/30/2022 $245.13 00008694 E03965 MIHALIK, DANNY J 06/30/2022 $2,845.45 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 12
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008695 E04840 MONTOYA, DAWN M 06/30/2022 $1,674.59 00008696 E04865 MORIN, LINDA M 06/30/2022 $3,966.09 00008697 E04352 MORSE, JEREMY N 06/30/2022 $3,541.24 00008698 E01940 MORTON, NATHAN D 06/30/2022 $4,331.99 00008699 E04454 MOSER, MICHAEL A 06/30/2022 $1,758.77 00008700 E04330 MOSSER, MITCHEL S 06/30/2022 $3,485.14 00008701 E03929 MURILLO JR, RAUL 06/30/2022 $3,994.99 00008702 E04626 MURO, JASON M 06/30/2022 $3,298.17 00008703 E04577 MUSCHETTO, PATRICK J 06/30/2022 $11,451.02 00008704 E03422 NADOLSKI, THOMAS R 06/30/2022 $2,195.02 00008705 E04111 NEELY, JACOB J 06/30/2022 $3,214.26 00008706 E04436 NGUYEN, JEFFREY C 06/30/2022 $4,100.40 00008707 E02813 NGUYEN, TRINA T 06/30/2022 $1,883.80 00008708 E04540 NIKOLIC, ADAM C 06/30/2022 $5,030.36 00008709 E03350 OLIVO, JOSHUA T 06/30/2022 $4,006.59 00008710 E04035 ORTIZ, STEVEN TRUJILLO 06/30/2022 $2,965.11 00008711 E03427 PANELLA, JOSEPH N 06/30/2022 $3,169.78 00008712 E04910 PAQUA, BRANDON J 06/30/2022 $2,243.07 00008713 E01948 PARK, BRANDY J 06/30/2022 $2,822.31 00008714 E02995 PAYAN, CRISTINA V 06/30/2022 $2,686.95 00008715 E00824 PAYAN, LUIS A 06/30/2022 $4,444.89 00008716 E04843 PEREZ, EMMANUEL 06/30/2022 $3,241.25 00008717 E01657 PEREZ, OMAR F 06/30/2022 $3,142.51 00008718 E00145 PERKINS, JASON S 06/30/2022 $4,760.11 00008719 E04429 PHAM, PHILLIP H 06/30/2022 $3,689.91 00008720 E06938 PLUARD, DOUGLAS A 06/30/2022 $4,946.73 00008721 E03299 POLOPEK, COREY T 06/30/2022 $3,655.02 00008722 E04788 QUIROZ, LUIS A 06/30/2022 $2,757.47 00008723 E03967 RAMIREZ OROZCO, SINDY 06/30/2022 $4,304.57 00008724 E04955 RAMIREZ, KAYLYN C 06/30/2022 $1,855.66 00008725 E03390 RAMIREZ, LUIS F 06/30/2022 $3,790.38 00008726 E05021 RAMIREZ, TERRA M 06/30/2022 $3,023.36 00008727 E04914 RAMOS, RODOLFO B 06/30/2022 $276.79 00008728 E03217 RANEY, JOHN E 06/30/2022 $3,231.74 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 13
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008729 E04941 RASMUSSEN, TRENTON L 06/30/2022 $2,646.49 00008730 E04659 REED, THOMAS S 06/30/2022 $2,503.77 00008731 E03486 REYES, RON A 06/30/2022 $3,217.91 00008732 E04911 RICHARDS, BRYANT D 06/30/2022 $2,572.48 00008733 E04437 RICHMOND, RYAN R 06/30/2022 $2,878.27 00008734 E04860 ROCHA, RUDY A 06/30/2022 $318.31 00008735 E04738 RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL 06/30/2022 $3,558.08 00008736 E04082 RODRIGUEZ, JENNIFER M 06/30/2022 $2,225.62 00008737 E05001 RODRIGUEZ, RYAN ELIJAH 06/30/2022 $2,316.24 00008738 E04438 ROGERS, CHRISTIN E 06/30/2022 $3,119.22 00008739 E04385 ROJAS, ASHLEY C 06/30/2022 $2,123.89 00008740 E04507 ROMBOUGH, JENNIFER V 06/30/2022 $2,049.23 00008741 E04552 RUZIECKI, ERIC T 06/30/2022 $3,672.03 00008742 E02845 SALAZAR, SEAN M 06/30/2022 $7,293.67 00008743 E04845 SALGADO JR., ALFREDO 06/30/2022 $2,291.47 00008744 E03297 SAMOFF, TANYA L 06/30/2022 $2,934.41 00008745 E02646 SANTANA, LINO G 06/30/2022 $6,343.65 00008746 E03035 SEYMOUR, SUSAN A I 06/30/2022 $2,526.31 00008747 E04282 SHELGREN, CHRISTOPHER M 06/30/2022 $4,618.99 00008748 E04616 SHIPLEY, AARON T 06/30/2022 $2,863.53 00008749 E02937 SHORROW, NICOLE D 06/30/2022 $2,342.50 00008750 E04864 SILVA, LEVI JOENIEL 06/30/2022 $2,592.32 00008751 E04576 SIMONS, SHAYLEN L 06/30/2022 $3,423.99 00008752 E04934 SLETTVET, HEATHER P 06/30/2022 $2,131.97 00008753 E02587 SOSEBEE, DANNY J 06/30/2022 $2,316.85 00008754 E03563 SPELLMAN, MARSHA D 06/30/2022 $2,662.89 00008755 E04500 STAAL, GAREY D 06/30/2022 $7,949.99 00008756 E03218 STARNES, CHARLES W 06/30/2022 $3,687.16 00008757 E03761 STEPHENSON III, ROBERT M 06/30/2022 $4,536.75 00008758 E04584 STROUD, BRIAN T 06/30/2022 $4,416.72 00008759 E02979 TESSIER, PAUL M 06/30/2022 $3,743.30 00008760 E04449 TRAN, SPENCER T 06/30/2022 $2,472.87 00008761 E02982 VAICARO, VINCENTE J 06/30/2022 $5,493.45 00008762 E03053 VALENCIA, EDGAR 06/30/2022 $3,555.18 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 14
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008763 E04667 VAUGHN, CALEB I 06/30/2022 $389.74 00008764 E04977 VAZQUEZ, BRIAN M 06/30/2022 $497.42 00008765 E04434 VELLANOWETH, KIMBRA S 06/30/2022 $4,028.93 00008766 E04903 VIGIL, DANIEL C 06/30/2022 $2,775.90 00008767 E03022 VU, TUONG-VAN NGUYEN 06/30/2022 $2,155.10 00008768 E01905 WAINWRIGHT, JONATHAN B 06/30/2022 $3,562.19 00008769 E03220 WARDLE, DENNIS 06/30/2022 $3,802.02 00008770 E03213 WARDLE, SANTA 06/30/2022 $2,316.35 00008771 E04758 WEYKER, CHRYSTAL L 06/30/2022 $1,883.56 00008772 E03930 WHITNEY, CHERYL L 06/30/2022 $4,933.62 00008773 E03305 WIMMER, ROYCE C 06/30/2022 $4,845.18 00008774 E04762 WREN, DANIELLE E 06/30/2022 $2,742.03 00008775 E04763 WRIGHT, SARAH A 06/30/2022 $2,606.43 00008776 E04856 XU, DUO 06/30/2022 $1,518.86 00008777 E03543 YELENSKY, SHANNON M 06/30/2022 $1,794.06 00008778 E04156 YERGLER, JOHN J 06/30/2022 $3,577.09 00008779 E04722 YNIGUEZ, COLE A 06/30/2022 $2,189.20 00008780 E09942 YOUNG, DAVID C 06/30/2022 $4,112.98 00008781 E01978 ZMIJA, ADAM D 06/30/2022 $12,594.27 00008782 E04517 AGUIRRE, ALFRED J 06/30/2022 $3,499.63 00008783 E01626 AGUIRRE, ANSELMO 06/30/2022 $2,055.32 00008784 E04451 AGUIRRE, ANTHONY U 06/30/2022 $329.77 00008785 E04631 ANDREI, IOAN 06/30/2022 $1,095.20 00008786 E04678 BABINSKI IV, SYLVESTER A 06/30/2022 $1,927.80 00008787 E04336 BECERRA, RODOLPHO M 06/30/2022 $2,278.36 00008788 E04972 BECERRA-SAMANIEGO JR, GABRIEL 06/30/2022 $1,897.94 00008789 E04770 BELL, DONEISHA L 06/30/2022 $815.15 00008790 E01255 BOS, MICHAEL C 06/30/2022 $2,167.81 00008791 E04650 BUCHLER, RAYMOND A 06/30/2022 $1,560.28 00008792 E01584 CANDELARIA, DANIEL J 06/30/2022 $4,127.76 00008793 E04300 CANO, EDGAR A 06/30/2022 $2,145.84 00008794 E03828 CANTRELL, JEFFREY G 06/30/2022 $2,304.51 00008795 E03811 CARRISOZA, ALBERT J 06/30/2022 $2,244.06 00008796 E00916 CARTER, PHILLIP J 06/30/2022 $3,141.66 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 15
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008797 E04869 CHAVEZ, DAMIAN JESUS 06/30/2022 $532.87 00008798 E04551 CONTRERAS, GABRIELA R 06/30/2022 $2,909.07 00008799 E03518 COTTON, JULIE T 06/30/2022 $1,748.60 00008800 E03807 DE LA ROSA, VINCENT L 06/30/2022 $3,141.34 00008801 E03736 DIBAJ, KAMYAR 06/30/2022 $3,656.94 00008802 E04989 DOCHERTY, PAUL 06/30/2022 $593.73 00008803 E02515 DUVALL, RICK L 06/30/2022 $2,835.90 00008804 E04514 ESPINOZA, ERIC M 06/30/2022 $1,954.20 00008805 E03733 ESPINOZA, JULIA 06/30/2022 $1,282.86 00008806 E03405 FERNANDEZ, CECELIA A 06/30/2022 $1,258.58 00008807 E04997 FLORES, ANTHONY 06/30/2022 $713.67 00008808 E04990 FLORES, MITCHELL C 06/30/2022 $713.67 00008809 E00558 FREGOSO, ALICE K 06/30/2022 $2,032.50 00008810 E05010 GALVAN, EDGAR 06/30/2022 $894.79 00008811 E04754 GARCIA, ALICIA R 06/30/2022 $1,516.50 00008812 E04677 GIROUARD, CASEY G 06/30/2022 $1,548.65 00008813 E04629 GOMEZ, DIANA 06/30/2022 $1,003.82 00008814 E03341 GONZALEZ, JORGE 06/30/2022 $1,213.86 00008815 E04473 GOUNTOUMA, SOUMELIA K 06/30/2022 $2,348.17 00008816 E03400 GREENE, MICHAEL R 06/30/2022 $2,298.13 00008817 E03685 GUZMAN, JESSE 06/30/2022 $901.78 00008818 E04299 HANSEN, AARON R 06/30/2022 $2,047.00 00008819 E03523 HARO, GLORIA A 06/30/2022 $1,237.04 00008820 E03759 HERNANDEZ, HERMILO 06/30/2022 $2,272.27 00008821 E04622 HOFER, ALICIA M 06/30/2022 $2,032.62 00008822 E02874 HOLMON III, ALBERT J 06/30/2022 $3,765.79 00008823 E04347 HSIEH, NICOLAS C 06/30/2022 $3,794.61 00008824 E03588 HUYNH, HUY HOA 06/30/2022 $2,311.26 00008825 E04831 ILFELD, MATTHEW D 06/30/2022 $1,418.20 00008826 E01907 JACOT, ROSEMARIE 06/30/2022 $2,127.93 00008827 E04296 JOHNSON, ERIC W 06/30/2022 $1,954.99 00008828 E04979 JURADO, MICHAEL 06/30/2022 $1,176.43 00008829 E04470 KAYLOR, BRENT 06/30/2022 $2,541.58 00008830 E04728 KHALIL, MARK M 06/30/2022 $2,261.92 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 16
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008831 E04382 KWIATKOWSKI, BRYAN D 06/30/2022 $1,786.32 00008832 E02852 LADNEY, MARK W 06/30/2022 $3,676.31 00008833 E04769 LAMAS, LEONEL A 06/30/2022 $976.03 00008834 E03813 LEWIS, SHAN L 06/30/2022 $2,579.18 00008835 E03301 LEYVA, RAUL 06/30/2022 $6,917.77 00008836 E05006 MARQUEZ, STEVEN ADAM 06/30/2022 $1,352.66 00008837 E05364 MARU, NAVIN B 06/30/2022 $3,238.95 00008838 E04665 MEJIA, DIEGO A 06/30/2022 $1,884.93 00008839 E03493 MENDEZ, RIGOBERTO 06/30/2022 $3,203.59 00008840 E04998 MENDOZA, LAURA 06/30/2022 $937.71 00008841 E04724 MOORE, DOUGLAS A 06/30/2022 $2,482.74 00008842 E04827 MORELAND, ANDREW J 06/30/2022 $1,852.50 00008843 E04222 MOSS, DANIEL C 06/30/2022 $2,082.47 00008844 E01243 MURRAY JR, WILLIAM E 06/30/2022 $6,550.01 00008845 E04634 NAVARRO, JUAN C 06/30/2022 $2,661.25 00008846 E00084 NGUYEN, KHUONG 06/30/2022 $1,273.87 00008847 E04969 ORNELLAS, MICHAEL 06/30/2022 $1,455.50 00008848 E03378 ORTIZ, STEVEN T 06/30/2022 $4,665.82 00008849 E04999 ORTUNO, ANIBAL 06/30/2022 $2,029.15 00008850 E03754 PINKSTON, RICHARD L 06/30/2022 $2,494.09 00008851 E04567 POWELL, AUSTIN H 06/30/2022 $2,410.56 00008852 E03799 QUIROZ, ROLANDO 06/30/2022 $2,205.15 00008853 E04572 REED, MELVIN P 06/30/2022 $1,962.24 00008854 E02058 REYES, DELFRADO C 06/30/2022 $1,273.87 00008855 E04295 ROBLES, RAFAEL 06/30/2022 $1,831.82 00008856 E04563 RODRIGUEZ, ADRIANNA M 06/30/2022 $1,141.23 00008857 E05004 RUELAS, SERGIO 06/30/2022 $748.78 00008858 E04289 SALDIVAR, RICARDO 06/30/2022 $1,760.88 00008859 E04505 SANTOS, MICHAEL F 06/30/2022 $3,354.86 00008860 E04215 SMOUSE, TREVOR G 06/30/2022 $2,456.47 00008861 E04836 SOTO, WILLIAM A 06/30/2022 $1,609.95 00008862 E03091 SUDDUTH, STEPHEN D 06/30/2022 $2,706.14 00008863 E01625 TAPIA, LUIS A 06/30/2022 $2,552.14 00008864 E04756 TARIN, ALEXIS P 06/30/2022 $2,968.07 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 17
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008865 E03239 TAUANU U, STEVE J 06/30/2022 $2,011.99 00008866 E08661 THOMPSON, MICHAEL W 06/30/2022 $3,681.08 00008867 E04773 THURMAN JR, EDWIN O 06/30/2022 $996.67 00008868 E08679 THURMAN, RODERICK 06/30/2022 $1,802.18 00008869 E03480 TRIMBLE, EMILY H 06/30/2022 $1,946.84 00008870 E04825 TRUJILLO, JOSEPH E 06/30/2022 $1,602.11 00008871 E02482 UPHUS, MARK P 06/30/2022 $4,309.77 00008872 E03681 VASQUEZ, JOSE A 06/30/2022 $3,059.28 00008873 E02942 VERA, EVARISTO 06/30/2022 $2,194.74 00008874 E03727 VERGARA NEAL, ANA G 06/30/2022 $2,827.74 00008875 E03670 VITALI, SUSAN 06/30/2022 $569.51 00008876 E01580 VU, DAI C 06/30/2022 $4,232.66 00008877 E04362 VU, KHANG L 06/30/2022 $3,244.02 00008878 E04896 WESTON, SHAQUANNA D 06/30/2022 $744.81 00008879 E01619 WHITE, WILLIAM J 06/30/2022 $2,317.03 00008880 E03414 WILLIAMS, HILLARD J 06/30/2022 $104.09 00008881 E04006 WILLIAMS, RICHARD L 06/30/2022 $2,286.38 00008882 E05023 YNIGUEZ, KARISSA N 06/30/2022 $2,364.47 00008883 E03436 ZIEGLER, RICK S 06/30/2022 $1,372.27 00008884 E03917 ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER L 06/30/2022 $67.98 00008885 E04163 AMBRIZ GARCIA, EDWARD D 06/30/2022 $1,369.91 00008886 E04784 BANUELOS, ALEJANDRO 06/30/2022 $2,348.94 00008887 E04063 BERGER, JAN 06/30/2022 $2,350.32 00008888 E00651 BERMUDEZ, ROBERT P 06/30/2022 $3,231.50 00008889 E03495 BLAS, VICTOR T 06/30/2022 $2,440.65 00008890 E00070 CANNON, TIM P 06/30/2022 $4,612.02 00008891 E04365 DAN, CARINA M 06/30/2022 $2,334.99 00008892 E04440 DAVIS, RYAN H 06/30/2022 $2,300.34 00008893 E03145 DE LA ROSA, FRANK X 06/30/2022 $3,244.66 00008894 E03051 DIEMERT, RONALD W 06/30/2022 $2,628.73 00008895 E02718 ESCOBAR, CHRIS N 06/30/2022 $3,442.67 00008896 E03688 GLENN, JEREMY J 06/30/2022 $785.73 00008897 E01618 GOMEZ, JOSE 06/30/2022 $2,317.48 00008898 E02701 GONZALEZ, ALEJANDRO 06/30/2022 $2,876.72 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 18
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008899 E01652 GRAY, MICHAEL J 06/30/2022 $2,822.88 00008900 E03763 GRIFFIN, LARRY 06/30/2022 $2,598.98 00008901 E04828 GUERRERO, MICHAEL V 06/30/2022 $1,808.81 00008902 E04018 HAENDIGES, ROBERT A 06/30/2022 $3,398.14 00008903 E03575 HART, RYAN S 06/30/2022 $2,477.87 00008904 E03701 HAYES, BRENT W 06/30/2022 $3,302.39 00008905 E03399 HOWENSTEIN, FRANK D 06/30/2022 $2,486.70 00008906 E03406 HUY, EDWARD A 06/30/2022 $2,214.16 00008907 E04782 JIN, LIYAN 06/30/2022 $2,360.27 00008908 E03534 KIM, SAMUEL K 06/30/2022 $3,725.27 00008909 E03254 KIRZHNER, ALLEN G 06/30/2022 $3,069.81 00008910 E03988 LI, REBECCA PIK KWAN 06/30/2022 $4,124.27 00008911 E02063 MA AE, DAVID 06/30/2022 $2,011.20 00008912 E03249 MANSON, RAQUEL K 06/30/2022 $2,901.62 00008913 E04837 MARTINEZ, ALFREDO 06/30/2022 $1,997.56 00008914 E02124 MEISLAHN, TYLER 06/30/2022 $2,069.24 00008915 E04403 MONTGOMERY, JESSE K 06/30/2022 $2,332.90 00008916 E04707 MORRIS, JUSTIN M 06/30/2022 $1,792.28 00008917 E03590 MOYA JR, STEVEN J 06/30/2022 $2,376.98 00008918 E03519 MURAD, BASIL G 06/30/2022 $2,744.74 00008919 E03144 NATLAND, KIRK L 06/30/2022 $1,465.15 00008920 E04291 NGUYEN, DUC TRUNG 06/30/2022 $2,416.85 00008921 E04904 NGUYEN, LISA 06/30/2022 $698.25 00008922 E03221 NICOLAE, CORNELIU 06/30/2022 $3,083.79 00008923 E04210 NUNES, BRANDON S 06/30/2022 $2,196.83 00008924 E03923 ORNELAS, ANDREW I 06/30/2022 $2,895.12 00008925 E03582 ORTEGA, DAVID A 06/30/2022 $2,687.86 00008926 E03578 PASILLAS, CELESTINO J 06/30/2022 $2,967.34 00008927 E03170 PEARSON, WILLIAM F 06/30/2022 $2,436.60 00008928 E04950 PHAM ADA, DYLLAN TUAN ANH 06/30/2022 $669.05 00008929 E04805 POLIDORI, JESSICA J 06/30/2022 $3,169.20 00008930 E02500 PORRAS, STEPHEN 06/30/2022 $3,523.14 00008931 E04489 PRUDHOMME, CHRISTOPHER B 06/30/2022 $2,296.64 00008932 E07590 RUITENSCHILD, LES A 06/30/2022 $3,246.21 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 19
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00008933 E03926 RUIZ, JONATHAN 06/30/2022 $2,598.70 00008934 E07690 SANTOS, ALEXIS 06/30/2022 $1,833.55 00008935 E07692 SARMIENTO, ADRIAN M 06/30/2022 $2,486.45 00008936 E04956 SON, TOMMY T 06/30/2022 $2,221.45 00008937 E04301 TALAMANTES JR, ALBERT 06/30/2022 $2,635.67 00008938 E04121 TRAN, MINH K 06/30/2022 $2,349.56 00008939 E00151 VALENZUELA JR, ALEJANDRO 06/30/2022 $0.00 00008940 E08881 VALENZUELA, ALEJANDRO N 06/30/2022 $2,848.30 00008941 E01882 VIRAMONTES, JESSE 06/30/2022 $1,841.25 00008942 E04195 WOLLAND, RONALD J 06/30/2022 $1,643.00 00008943 E09940 YERGENSEN, VICTOR K 06/30/2022 $3,087.54 00008944 E09954 ZAVALA, JOHN 06/30/2022 $2,750.55 Issued: 623 $1,566,104.56
EF - Payroll EFT Total: 623 $1,566,104.56
Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
FEFM001 All Checks Register
Check Dates Jun 30, 2022
Bank(s): EF - Payroll EFT, PY - Payroll
Report Generated on Jun 28, 2022 3:03:12 PM Page 20
PY - Payroll
Check Vendor # Vendor Name Issue Date Check Amount
00185041 E04994 GREENUP, BREANNA C 06/30/2022 $342.03 00185042 E05027 SANCHEZ MENDOZA, ALFREDO 06/30/2022 $1,848.20 00185043 E00977 BELAIR, DIANE 06/30/2022 $2,021.77 00185044 E04930 CHOW, IRIS L 06/30/2022 $1,039.87 00185045 E05036 DINH, NGUYEN KHOA 06/30/2022 $269.87 00185046 E05013 DINH, TIFFANY 06/30/2022 $599.99 00185047 E05015 FALETOI, TERRY U 06/30/2022 $181.43 00185048 E04982 GONZALEZ, KATHERYN 06/30/2022 $881.37 00185049 E04808 HUANG, HALLIE S 06/30/2022 $214.51 00185050 E05032 LEE, JASON J 06/30/2022 $366.75 00185051 E04936 NGUYEN, BRENDAN L 06/30/2022 $514.27 00185052 E05026 PACHECO, ALEXANDER 06/30/2022 $845.02 00185053 E04824 PACHECO, LAURA M 06/30/2022 $228.48 00185054 E05034 SMITH, NATHAN O 06/30/2022 $910.62 00185055 E05029 ALARID, DAVID M 06/30/2022 $979.09 00185056 E05028 AMAYA, JOSE J 06/30/2022 $963.42 00185057 E05040 ARCHULETA, ANDREW M 06/30/2022 $1,032.15 00185058 E05041 BARRIOS-ROA, JAYDE D. 06/30/2022 $963.42 00185059 E05037 GAINES, JEFFREY S 06/30/2022 $343.45 00185060 E05012 HODNETT, RYAN P 06/30/2022 $719.13 00185061 E05031 RAMIREZ, AACIN 06/30/2022 $1,810.72 00185062 E03529 ROCHA, MICHAEL F 06/30/2022 $2,669.03 00185063 E03446 JIMENEZ, VIDAL 06/30/2022 $2,009.28 Issued: 23 $21,753.87
PY - Payroll Total: 23 $21,753.87
Issued: 646 $1,587,858.43
Summary Total: 646 $1,587,858.43
Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: keisukef
6/30/2022

Agenda Item - 4.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Approval of the 2022
Drinking Water Public Health
Goal Report. ( Action Item)
Date: 7/12/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to conduct a public hearing to receive comments and to approve the City’s 2022 Drinking Water Public Health Goal Report.

BACKGROUND
In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that municipalities provide safe, clean drinking water. The act sets the mandatory and enforceable levels of constituents in water known as Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). The range and value of these constituents must be communicated to customers annually in our Water Quality Report. Staff prepared this report and it has been available on the City’s website as of July 1, 2022, as required by the State Water Resources Control Board.

Additionally, California’s Health and Safety Code Section 116470(b) requires a separate report be generated detailing any contaminants that exceed the Public Health Goal levels (PHG) set by the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), referred to as the Public Health Goal Report. If there are no exceedances of the PHGs, no report is required. Also, any PHG Report is not required to be sent to residents, however, it must be made available upon request.

DISCUSSION
The City of Garden Grove’s water supply continues to be in full compliance with all enforceable standards required by state and federal regulatory agencies. PHGs established by the OEHHA and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency are based solely on public health risk considerations being set at levels where the health risks are very low, or zero. The determinations of health risks at these low levels are frequently theoretical. The apparent purpose of the PHG Report is to give water system customers access to information on levels of contaminants, even below the

enforceable mandatory MCLs. PHGs and MCLGs are not enforceable.

Additionally, agencies that operate water systems are required to report any exceeded PHGs or MCLGs to their governing bodies and to hold a public hearing to accept and respond to public comment related to any exceedances. The Public Health Goal Report is only required if a PHG was exceeded on a three (3) year reporting cycle.

For the 2022 Public Health Goal Report, three (3) contaminants: arsenic, perchlorate and uranium are required to be reported to governing bodies and consumers because they exceed the PHGs, although none of the samples exceeded any enforceable regulatory levels.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact. The City meets or exceeds all enforceable standards required by state and federal regulatory agencies.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Conduct a Public Hearing; and

Approve the Public Health Goal Report as submitted.

By: Samuel K. Kim, P.E., Water Services Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Water Quality
Report 2022 6/22/2022 Backup Material Garden_Grove_2022_WQ_Report_(English_Web).pdf Public Health Goal
Report 2022 6/22/2022 Backup Material Garden_Grove_2022_PHG.pdf

•
•

GARDEN GROVE
S
ince 1990, California public water utilities have been providing an annual Water Quality Report to their customers. This year’s report covers calendar year 2021 drinking water quality testing and reporting.

The City of Garden Grove Water Services Division (City) vigilantly safe - guards its water supply and, as in years past, the water delivered to your home meets the quality standards required by federal and state regulatory agencies. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water (DDW) are the agencies responsible for establishing and enforcing drinking water quality standards.

In some cases, the City goes beyond what is required by testing for unregulated chemicals that may have known health risks but do not have drinking water standards. For example, the Orange County Water District (OCWD), which manages the groundwater basin, and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC), which supplies imported treated surface water to the City test f or unregulated chemicals in our water supply. Unregulated chemical monitoring helps USEPA and DDW determine where certain chemicals occur and whether new standards need to
be established for those chemicals to
protect public health.

Through drinking water quality testing
programs carried out by OCWD for
groundwater, MWDSC for treated surface
water and the City for the water distri -
bution system, your drinking water is
constantly monitored from source to tap
for regulated and unregulated
constituents. The state allows us to
monitor for some contami nants less than
once per year because the concentra tions
of these contaminants do not change
frequently.

Some of our data, though representa -
tive, are more than one year old.

Your 2022 Water Quality ReportYour 2022 Water Quality Report We Appreciate All You Do
to Save Water
T
hank you! For all we’ve been
through these many years of
intermittent drought, the City of
Garden Grove Water Services
Division extends its heartfelt
thanks to all of you who have
worked so hard to conserve water.

When the seemingly impossible
was asked of you — that you
conserve 20% of our water at the
height of the last drought — you not only met this goal, you exceeded it. And best of all, you continued to conserve water after the drought was officially declared to be over.

Now, as we potentially enter another year of drought, the City is in a better position than it has been in previous droughts. All because you, our citizens, take your responsibilities seriously.

You know we live in an arid land, and you recognize water conservation has to be more than a passing passion — it must be a way of life.

As with all of you, it is our fondest hope we will escape another year of drought. But beyond our hopes, we have
confidence the citizens of Garden Grove will always know what to do to conserve their water.

Báo cáo này chứa thông tin quan trọng
về nước uống của quý vị. Hãy dịch báo cáo,
hoặc nói chuyện với một người hiểu báo cáo này.
본 보고는 귀하의 식수에 관한
중요한 정보를 가지고 있습니다.
번역, 또는 이 보고를 이해하는
사람에게 물어보십시오.

This report contains important information
about your drinking water. T ranslate it,
or speak with someone who understands it.

Este informe contiene informa ción muy importante
sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo ó hable
con alguien que lo entienda bien.
~ 2 ~

stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater
discharges, oil and gas production, mining and farming.

S Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production or mining activities.

S Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are by-products of industrial
processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gasoline stations, urban stormwater runoff, agricultural application and septic systems.

In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, USEPA and the DDW pre scribe regulations that
limit the amount of certain
contami nants in water provided
by public water systems.

The U.S. Food and Drug
Admini stra tion regulations and
California law also establish limits
for contaminants in bottled water
that must provide the same
protection for public health.

Drinking water, including bottled
water, may reasonably be
expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants.

The presence of contami nants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk.

More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791.

Sources of Supply
Your drinking water is a
blend of mostly groundwater
from 12 wells in the Orange
County ground water basin
and also surface water
imported by MWDSC.

MWDSC’s imported water
sources are a blend of State Water Project water from Northern California and water from the Colorado River Aqueduct. Your ground water comes from a natural under ground reservoir managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) that stretches from the Prado Dam and fans across the north western portion of Orange County, excluding the communities of Brea and La Habra, and stretching as far south as the El T oro ‘Y.’ Last year, as in years past, your tap water met all USEPA and state drinking water health standards. The City vigilantly safe - guards its water supplies and once again, we are proud to report that our system has never violated a maximum contami nant level (MCL) or any other water quality standard. This brochure is a snapshot of last year’s water quality. Included are details about where your water comes from, what it contains, and how it compares to federal and state standards.

Basic Information About
Drinking Water Contaminants
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels over the surface of land or through the layers of the ground it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some
cases, radioactive
material, and can pick
up substances resulting
from the presence of
animal and human
activity.

Contaminants that
may be present in
source water include:

S Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic
systems, agricultural live stock operations and wildlife.

S Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a
variety of sources such as agriculture, urban
stormwater runoff and residential uses.

S Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals,
which can be natur ally occur ring or result from urban The Quality of Your Water is Our Primary ConcernThe Quality of Your Water is Our Primary Concern F
or information about this report,
or your water quality in general,
please contact the Water Quality
Staff at (714) 741-5395.

Public City Council meetings are
held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month at 6:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Community Meeting
Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove,
California 92840.

You may also contact our City Clerk’s Office,
Garden Grove City Hall, 11222 Acacia Park way,
Garden Grove, California 92840 or call (714) 741-5040 for informa tion about Garden Grove City Council meetings. Please feel free to participate in these meetings.

For more information about the health effects of the contaminants listed in the following tables, you may call the USEPA hotline at (800) 426-4791.

We Invite You to
Learn More About
Your Water’s Quality
~ 3 ~
Parker Dam
on the
Colorado
River
Parker Dam
on the
Colorado
River

GARDEN GROVE
To Safeguard Against Issues that May Affect Your Health We Comply with All State & Federal Water Quality Regulations About Lead in Tap Water
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and compo nents associated with service lines and home plumbing.

The City is respon sible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the poten tial for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking.

If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drink ing water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline, (800) 426-4791, or at: www.epa.gov/safewater/lead.

Drinking Water Fluoridation
Fluoride has been added to U.S. drinking water supplies since 1945. Of the 50 largest cities in the U.S., 43 fluoridate their drinking water.

In December 2007, MWDSC joined a majority of the nation’s public water suppliers in adding fluoride to drinking water in order to prevent tooth decay. MWDSC was in compliance with all provisions of the State's fluoridation system requirements. Our local water is not supplemented with fluoride. Fluoride levels in drinking water are limited under California state regulations at a maximum dosage of 2 parts per million.

Immunocompromised People
Some people may be more vulnerable to contami nants in drinking water than the general population. Immunocompromised people, such as those with cancer who are under going chemo - therapy, persons who have had organ trans plants, people with HIV / AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly persons, and infants can be particularly at risk to infection. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers.

Cryptosporidium
Cryptosporidium is a microscopic organism that, when ingested, can cause diarrhea, fever, and other gastro intestinal symptoms. The organism comes from animal and/ or human wastes and may be in surface water. MWDSC tested its source water and treated surface water for Cryptosporidium in 2021, but did not detect it. If it ever is detected, Cryptosporidium is elimi nated by an effective treatment combination includ ing sedimen ta tion, filtration, and disinfection.

The USEPA and the federal Centers for Disease Control guidelines on appro priate means to lessen the risk of infection by Crypto sporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from USEPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791, or visit them on the web at: www.epa.gov/safewater.

PFAS
PFAS (PFOA and PFOS) are a group of man-made chemicals that may pose a hazard to health. They have been widely used in a variety of products and are resistant to heat, water, oils and stains.

The City monitors very closely on PFOA and PFOS levels in our supply wells per the latest State guidelines. Six of the City’s wells have been taken offline as a precaution, and the City is working on design/ construction of treatment systems before reactivating the affected wells.

Additional information regarding PFOA and PFOS is available on the California Water Board’s Division of Drinking Water website at www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/.

PFAS can be found in:
~ 4 ~

Chart Legend
What are Water Quality Standards?
Drinking water standards established by USEPA and DDW set limits for substances that may affect consumer health or aesthetic qualities of drinking water. The charts in this report show the following types of water quality standards:

S Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): The highest level of a contami nant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible.

S Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.

S Secondary MCLs: Set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.

S Primary Drinking Water Standard: MCLs for conta mi nants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements and water treatment requirements.

S Regulatory Action Level (AL): The concen tra tion of a contaminant, which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.

What is a Water Quality Goal?
In addition to mandatory water quality standards, USEPA and DDW have set voluntary water quality goals for some con tami nants. Water quality goals are often set at such low levels that they are not achievable in practice and are not directly measur able. Nevertheless, these goals provide useful guide posts and direction for water management practices. The charts in this report include three types of water quality goals:

S Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by USEPA.

S Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG): The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.

S Public Health Goal (PHG): The level of a con tami nant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency.

How are Contaminants Measured?
Water is sampled and tested throughout the year. Contaminants are measured in:

S parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per liter (mg/L) S parts per billion (ppb) or micrograms per liter (µg/L) S parts per trillion (ppt) or nanograms per liter (ng/L) 2021 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Treated Surface Water PHG Average Range of MCL Typical Source Constituent MCL (MCLG) Amount Detections Violation? of Constituent Radiologicals – Tested in 2020 and 2021
Gross Alpha Particle Activity (pCi/L) 15 (0) ND ND – 3 No Erosion of Natural Deposits Gross Beta Particle Activity (pCi/L) 50 (0) 5 4 – 6 No Decay of Natural and Man-made Deposits Uranium (pCi/L) 20 0.43 2 1 – 3 No Erosion of Natural Deposits Inorganic Chemicals – Tested in 2021
Aluminum (ppm) 1 0.6 0.141 ND – 0.21 No Treatment Process Residue, Natural Deposits Barium (ppm) 1 2 0.111 0.111 No Refinery Discharge, Erosion of Natural Deposits Bromate (ppb) 10 0.1 ND ND – 4.6 No Byproduct of Drinking Water Ozonation Fluoride (ppm) 2 1 0.7 0.6 – 0.9 No Water Additive for Dental Health Secondary Standards* – Tested in 2021
Aluminum (ppb) 200* 600 141 ND – 210 No Treatment Process Residue, Natural Deposits Chloride (ppm) 500* n/a 96 95 – 97 No Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Color (color units) 15* n/a 1 1 No Naturally-occurring Organic Materials Odor (threshold odor number) 3* n/a 2 2 No Naturally-occurring Organic Materials Specific Conductance (µmho/cm) 1,600* n/a 958 950 – 965 No Substances that Form Ions in Water Sulfate (ppm) 500* n/a 214 214 – 215 No Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) 1,000* n/a 597 597 No Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Unregulated Chemicals – Tested in 2018 and 2021
Alkalinity, total as CaCO3 (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 125 124 – 126 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Boron (ppm) NL = 1 n/a 0.13 0.13 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Calcium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 66 65 – 66 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Germanium (ppb) (1) Not Regulated n/a 0.1 ND – 0.4 n/a Erosion of Natural Deposits; Industrial Discharge Hardness, total as CaCO3 (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 274 271 – 276 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Hardness, total (grains/gallon) Not Regulated n/a 16 16 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Magnesium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 25 24 – 26 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Manganese (ppb) (1,2) 50* n/a 2.23 0.8 – 3.3 No Erosion of Natural Deposits pH (pH units) Not Regulated n/a 8.1 8.1 n/a Hydrogen Ion Concentration Potassium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 4.4 4.2 – 4.6 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Sodium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 94 93 – 95 n/a Runoff or Leaching from Natural Deposits Total Organic Carbon (ppm) TT n/a 2.4 1.9 – 2.8 n/a Various Natural and Man-made Sources ppb = parts per billion; ppm = parts per million; pCi/L = picoCuries per liter; µmho/cm = micromhos per centimeter; ND = not detected; MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level; (MCLG) = federal MCL Goal; PHG = California Public Health Goal; NL = Notification Level; n/a = not applicable; TT = treatment technique *Chemical is regulated by a secondary standard.
(1) Constituent is part of the Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4) (2) Manganese is regulated with a secondary standard but was not detected, based on the detection limit for purposes of reporting of 20 ppb.

Turbidity – combined filter effluent Treatment Turbidity TT Typical Source Metropolitan Water District Diemer Filtration Plant Technique Measurements Violation? of Constituent 1) Highest single turbidity measurement (NTU) 0.3 0.03 No Soil Runoff 2) Percentage of samples less than or equal to 0.3 NTU 95% 100% No Soil Runoff Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of the water, an indication of particulate matter, some of which might include harmful microorganisms. NTU = nephelometric turbidity units Low turbidity in Metropolitan’s treated water is a good indicator of effective filtration. Filtration is called a ”treatment technique“ (TT).

A treatment technique is a required process intended to reduce the level of chemicals in drinking water that are difficult and sometimes impossible to measure directly. ~ 5 ~

2021 City of Garden Grove Groundwater Quality
Average Range of MCL Most Recent Typical Source Constituent MCL PHG Amount Detections Violation? Sampling Date of Constituent Radiologicals
Uranium (pCi/L) 20 0.43 8.05 5.15 – 10.1 No 2021 Erosion of Natural Deposits Inorganic Chemicals
Arsenic (ppb) 10 0.004 <2 ND – 2.4 No 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Barium (ppm) 1 2 <0.1 ND – 0.128 No 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Fluoride (ppm) 2 1 0.45 0.41 – 0.49 No 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Nitrate (ppm as N) 10 10 3.64 2.38 – 4.36 No 2021 Fertilizers, Septic Tanks Nitrate+Nitrite (ppm as N) 10 10 3.64 2.38 – 4.36 No 2021 Fertilizers, Septic Tanks Perchlorate (ppb) 6 1 <2 ND – 3.8 No 2021 Industrial Discharge Secondary Standards*
Chloride (ppm) 500* n/a 79.5 40.5 – 117 No 2021 Erosion of Natural Deposits Specific Conductance (µmho/cm) 1,600* n/a 869 613 – 1,060 No 2021 Erosion of Natural Deposits Sulfate (ppm) 500* n/a 125 84.4 – 145 No 2021 Erosion of Natural Deposits Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) 1,000* n/a 544 387 – 690 No 2021 Erosion of Natural Deposits Turbidity (NTU) 5* n/a <0.1 ND – 0.2 No 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Unregulated Constituents
Alkalinity, total as CaCO3 (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 185 167 – 216 n/a 2021 Erosion of Natural Deposits Boron (ppm) NL = 1 n/a 0.11 ND – 0.26 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Bromide (ppm) (1) Not Regulated n/a 0.22 0.104 – 0.62 n/a 2019 Industrial Discharge Calcium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 102 77.8 – 113 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Chromium, Hexavalent (ppb) Not Regulated 0.02 1.5 ND – 2.3 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits; Industrial Discharge
Germanium (ppb) (1) Not Regulated n/a 0.02 ND – 0.3 n/a 2019 Erosion of Natural Deposits; Industrial Discharge
Hardness, total (grains/gal) Not Regulated n/a 19 14 – 22 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Hardness, total as CaCO3 (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 330 248 – 372 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Magnesium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 18 13 – 22 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Manganese (ppb) (1,2) 50* n/a 0.14 ND – 1.8 No 2019 Erosion of Natural Deposits PFAS Compounds
Perfluoro butane sulfonic acid (PFBS) (ppt) NL = 500 n/a <4 ND – 4.1 n/a 2021 Industrial Discharge Perfluoro hexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS) (ppt) Not Regulated n/a 6.4 ND – 17.4 n/a 2021 Industrial Discharge Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) (ppt) Not Regulated n/a <4 ND – 4.3 n/a 2021 Industrial Discharge Perfluoro octane sulfonic acid (PFOS) (ppt) NL = 6.5 n/a 8.5 ND – 28.8 n/a 2021 Industrial Discharge Perfluoro octanoic acid (PFOA) (ppt) NL = 5.1 n/a 4 ND – 10.4 n/a 2021 Industrial Discharge pH (pH units) Not Regulated n/a 7.8 7.7 – 7.9 n/a 2020 Acidity, hydrogen ions Potassium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 4 3.2 – 5.2 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Total Organic Carbon Not Regulated n/a 0.28 0.17 – 0.48 n/a 2019 Various Natural and (Unfiltered)(ppm) (1) Man-made Sources Sodium (ppm) Not Regulated n/a 57 36.5 – 90.5 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits Vanadium, Total (ppb) NL = 50 n/a <3 ND – 3.8 n/a 2020 Erosion of Natural Deposits; Industrial Discharge
ppb = parts-per-billion; ppm = parts-per-million; ppt = parts per trillion; pCi/L = picoCuries per liter; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units; ND = not detected; µmho/cm = micromho per centimeter; NL = Notification Level; n/a = not applicable; < = average is less than the detection limit for reporting purposes; MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level; PHG = California Public Health Goal *Contaminant is regulated by a secondary standard to maintain aesthetic qualities (taste, odor, color). (1) Constituent is part of the Fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4) (2) Manganese is regulated with a secondary standard but was not detected, based on the detection limit for purposes of reporting of 20 ppb. ~ 6 ~

Source Water Assessments
Imported (MWDSC) Water Assessment
Every five years, MWDSC is required by DDW to examine
possible sources of drinking water contamination in its State Water Project and Colorado River source waters.

The most recent surveys for MWDSC's source waters are the Colorado River Watershed Sanitary Survey
– 2020 Update, and the State Water
Project Watershed Sanitary Survey –
2016 Update.

Water from the Colorado River is
considered to be most vulnerable to
contamination from recreation, urban/stormwater
runoff, increasing urbanization in the watershed, and wastewater.

Water supplies from Northern California’s State Water Project are most vulnerable to contamination from urban/stormwater runoff, wildlife, agriculture, recreation, and wastewater.

USEPA also requires MWDSC to complete one Source Water
Assessment (SWA) that utilizes information collected in the water shed sanitary surveys. MWDSC completed its SWA in December 2002. The SWA is used to evalu ate the vulnerability of water sources to con tamination and helps deter mine whether more protective measures are needed.

A copy of the most recent summary of either Watershed Sanitary Survey or the SWA can be obtained by calling MWDSC at
(800) CALL-MWD (225-5693).

Groundwater Assessment
An assessment of the drinking
water sources for the City was
completed in December 2002. The
ground water sources are considered
most vulnerable to the following
activities associated with contami -
nants detected in the water supply: known contaminant plumes, historic agricultural activities and application of fertilizers, and parks. The groundwater sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities not associ ated with detected
contaminants: confirmed leaking under ground storage tanks, dry cleaners, gas stations, and photo processing/printing.

A copy of the complete assessment is available at State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water, 2 MacArthur Place, Suite 150, Santa Ana, California 92707.

You may request a summary of the assessment by contacting the City at (714) 741-5395.
2021 City of Garden Grove Distribution System Water Quality Disinfection MCL Average Range of MCL Typical Source Byproducts (MRDL/MRDLG) Amount Detections Violation? of Constituent Total Trihalomethanes (ppb) 80 32 ND – 74 No Byproducts of Chlorine Disinfection Haloacetic Acids (ppb) 60 8 ND – 17 No Byproducts of Chlorine Disinfection Chlorine Residual (ppm) (4 / 4) 1.13 0.12 – 2.65 No Disinfectant Added for Treatment Aesthetic Quality
Color (color units) 15* <1 ND – 2 No Erosion of Natural Deposits Turbidity (NTU) 5* <0.1 ND – 0.36 No Erosion of Natural Deposits Eight locations in the distribution system are tested quarterly for total trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids; thirty-three locations are tested each month for color, odor and turbidity. Odor was not detected in 2021.

MRDL = Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level; MRDLG = Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal *Contaminant is regulated by a secondary standard to maintain aesthetic qualities (taste, odor, color).

Lead and Copper Action Levels at Residential Taps
Action Level Public 90th Percentile Sites Exceeding AL / AL Typical Source (AL) Health Goal Value Number of Sites Violation? of Constituent Lead (ppb) 15 0.2 ND<5 0 / 50 No Corrosion of Household Plumbing Copper (ppm) 1.3 0.3 0.19 0 / 50 No Corrosion of Household Plumbing Every three years, at least 50 residences are tested for lead and copper at-the-tap. The most recent set of samples was collected in 2019.

Lead was not detected. Copper was detected above the reporting level in 38 samples, but none of the samples exceeded the copper Action Level.

A regulatory Action Level is the concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow .

In 2021, no school submitted a request to be sampled for lead.

Unregulated Chemicals Requiring Monitoring in the Distribution System Notification Average Range of Most Recent Constituent Level PHG Amount Detections Sampling Date Dibromoacetic Acid (ppb) n/a n/a 0.64 0.4 – 1.2 2019 ~ 7 ~

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
2022 PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS REPORT

JUNE 2022

City of Garden Grove 1 2022 PHGs Report
2022 Public Health Goals (PHGs) Report

City of Garden Grove

1.0 Introduction

Under the Calderon-Sher Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996 public water systems in California serving greater than 10,000 service connections must prepare a report containing information on 1) detection of any contaminant in drinking water at a level exceeding a Public Health Goal (PHG), 2) estimate of costs to remove detected contaminants to below the PHG using Best Available Technology (BAT), and 3) health risks for each contaminant exceeding a PHG. This report must be made available to the public every three years. The initial PHG Report was due on July 1, 1998, and subsequent reports are due every three years thereafter.

The 2022 PHGs Report has been prepared to address the requirements set forth in Section 116470 of the California Health and Safety Code. It is based on water quality analyses during calendar years 2019 , 2020, and 2021 or, if certain analyses were not performed during those years, the most recent data available. The 2022 PHGs Report has been designed to be as informative as possible, without unnecessary duplication of information contained in the Consumer Confidence Report, which is made available to customers by July 1st of each year.

There are no regulations explaining requirements for the preparation of PHGs reports. A
workgroup of the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Water Quality Committee has prepared suggested guidelines for water utilities to use in preparing PHGs reports. The ACWA guidelines were used in the preparation of this 2022 PHGs Report.

These guidelines include tables of cost estimates for BAT. The State of California (State) provides ACWA with numerical health risks and category of health risk information for contaminants with PHGs. This health risk information is appended to the ACWA guidelines.

City of Garden Grove 2 2022 PHGs Report

2.0 California Drinking Water Regulatory Process

California Health and Safety Code Section 116365 requires the State to develop a PHG for every contaminant with a primary drinking water standard or for any contaminant the State is proposing to regulate with a primary drinking water standard. A PHG is the level of a contaminant in drinking water that poses no significant health risk if consumed for a lifetime. The process of establishing a PHG is a risk assessment based strictly on human health considerations. PHGs are recommended targets and are not required to be met by any public water system.

The State office designated to develop PHGs is the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). The PHG is then forwarded to the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water (DDW) for use in revising or developing a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) in drinking water.

The MCL is the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. State MCLs cannot be less stringent than federal MCLs and must be as close as is technically and economically feasible to the PHGs. DDW is required to take treatment technologies and cost of compliance into account when setting an MCL. Each MCL is reviewed at least once every five years.

3.0 Identification of Contaminants

Section 116470(b)(1) of the Health and Safety Code requires public water systems serving more than 10,000 service connections to identify each contaminant detected in drinking water that exceeded the applicable PHG. Section 116470(f) requires the MCLG to be used for comparison if there is no applicable PHG.

The City of Garden Grove (City) water system has approximately 34,122 service connections. The following constituents were detected at one or more locations within the drinking water system at levels that exceeded the applicable PHGs or MCLGs:

City of Garden Grove 3 2022 PHGs Report
 Arsenic – naturally-occurring in local groundwater.
 Perchlorate – industrial contamination in groundwater  Uranium – naturally-occurring in local groundwater and in surface water purchased from MWDSC.

The accompanying table shows the applicable PHG or MCLG and MCL for each contaminant identified above. The table includes the maximum, minimum, and average concentrations of each contaminant in drinking water supplied by the City in calendar years 2019 through 2021.

4.0 Numerical Public Health Risks

Section 116470(b)(2) of the Health and Safety Code requires disclosure of the numerical public health risk, determined by OEHHA, associated with the MCLs, Action Levels, PHGs and MCLGs. Available numerical health risks developed by OEHHA for the contaminants identified above are shown on the accompany table. Only numerical risks associated with cancer-causing chemicals have been quantified by OEHHA. Cancer risk is stated in terms of “excess” cancer cases per million population.

Arsenic – OEHHA has determined the theoretical
health risk associated with the PHG is
one excess case of cancer in a million people . USEPA has determined the risk associated with the MCL is 2 .5 excess cases of cancer in 1,000 people exposed over a 70-year lifetime.

Perchlorate – OEHHA has not established a numerical health risk for perchlorate because PHGs for non -carcinogenic chemicals in drinking water are set at a concentration at which no known or anticipated adverse health risks will occur, with an adequate margin of safety.

City of Garden Grove 4 2022 PHGs Report
Uranium – OEHHA has determined the theoretical health risk associated with the PHG is 1 excess case of cancer in a million people. USEPA has determined the risk associated with the MCL is 5 excess cases of cancer in 100,000 people exposed over a 70-year lifetime.

5.0 Identification of Risk Categories

Section 116470(b)(3) of the Health and Safety Code requires identification of the category of risk to public health associated with exposure to the contaminant in drinking water, including a brief, plainly worded description of those terms. The risk categories and definitions for the contaminants identified above are shown on the accompanying table.

6.0 Description of Best Available Technology

Section 116470(b)(4) of the Health and Safety Code requires a description of the best available technology, if any is available on a commercial basis, to remove or reduce the concentrations of the contaminants identified above. The BATs are shown on the accompanying table.

7.0 Costs of Using Best Available Technologies and Intended Actions

Section 116470(b)(5) of the Health and Safety Code requires an estimate of the aggregate cost and cost per customer of utilizing the BATs identified to reduce the concentration of a contaminant to a level at or below the PHG or MCLG. In addition, Section 116470(b)(6) requires a brief description of any actions the water purveyor intends to take to reduce the concentration of the contaminant and the basis for that decision.

Arsenic – The BATs for removal of arsenic in water for large water systems are: activated alumina, coagulation/filtration, electrodialysis, ion exchange, lime softening, oxidation/filtration, and reverse osmosis. Arsenic was detected above the PHG in the

City of Garden Grove 5 2022 PHGs Report
local groundwater (three wells). The City is in compliance with the MCL for arsenic. The estimated cost to reduce arsenic levels in local groundwater to below the PHG of 0.004 microgram per liter (µg/l) using ion exchange was calculated. Because the DDW detection limit for purposes of reporting (DLR) for arsenic is 2 µg/l, treating arsenic to below the PHG level means treating arsenic to below the DLR of 2 µg/l. There are numerous factors that may influence the actual cost of reducing arsenic levels to the PHG.

Achieving the water quality goal for arsenic could be approximately $1,107,000 per year, or $32 per service connection per year.

Uranium – The only BAT for the removal of uranium in water for large water systems is reverse osmosis, which can also remove gross alpha and gross beta, if detected.

Uranium was detected above the PHG in the local groundwater ( 11 wells). The cost of providing treatment using Reverse Osmosis to reduce uranium levels in local groundwater below the PHG were calculated. The cost for achieving PHG for uranium could range from $10,500,000 to $38,700,000 per year, or between $310 and $1,134 per service connection per year.

Perchlorate – The BATs for removal of perchlorate in water are: ion exchange and biological fluidized bed reactor. Perchlorate was detected above the PHG in the local groundwater ( 9 wells
). The City is in compliance with the MCL for perchlorate. The estimated cost to reduce perchlorate levels in local groundwater to below the PHG of 1 µg/l using ion exchange was calculated. Because the DLR for perchlorate is 4 µg/l, treating perchlorate to below the PHG level means treating perchlorate to below the DLR
of 4 µg/l. There are numerous factors that may influence the actual cost of reducing perchlorate levels to the PHG. Achieving the water quality goal for perchlorate could range from $4,200,000 to $6,700,000 per year, or between $122 and $197 per service connection per year.

City of Garden Grove 6 2022 PHGs Report
All Contaminants – In addition, a cost estimate to treat all water produced or purchased by the City using ion exchange and reverse osmosis to remove all the contaminants detected above the PHGs or MCLGs was calculated. All the contaminants listed in the attached table may be removed to non-detectable levels by ion exchange and reverse osmosis. As shown on the attached table, achieving the water quality goals for all contaminants using ion exchange and reverse osmosis could range from $10,500,000 to $38,700,000 per year, or between $310 and $1,137 per
service connection per year.

For additional information, please contact Mr. Cel Pasillas at (714) 741-5276, or write to the City of Garden Grove , 11222 Acacia Parkway, P.O. Box 3070, Garden Grove, California 92842.

UNITS PHG CATEGORY CANCER RISK CANCER BEST AGGREGATE COST PER

PARAMETER OF OR MCL DLR OF AT PHG RISK AVAILABLE COST HOUSEHOLD MEASUREMENT (MCLG)* VALUE RANGE RISK OR MCLG AT MCL TECHNOLOGIES PER YEAR PER YEAR

INORGANIC CHEMICALS
Arsenic μg/l 0.004 10 2 <2 ND - 2.4 C 1 x 10-6 2.5 x 10-3 AA,C/F,E,IE,LS,O/F,RO $1,107,000 (c) $32 (c)
Perchlorate μg/l 1 6 4 <4 ND -4.1 E NA NA IE, BF $4,200,000 - $6,700,000 (e) $122 - $197 (e)

RADIOLOGICAL
Uranium pCi/l 0.43 20 1 4.7 2.9 - 13.5 C 1 x 10-6 5 x 10-5 RO $10,500,000 - $38,700,000 (f) $310 - $1,134
ALL CONTAMINANTS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- IE and RO $10,500,000 - $38,700,000 (g) $310 - $1,137 (g) * MCLGs are shown in parentheses. MCLGs are provided only when no applicable PHG exists.

RISK CATEGORIES TREATMENT/CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
C (Carcinogen) = A substance that is capable of producing cancer. AA = Activated Aluminum E (Endocrine Toxicity; Developmental Toxicity) = Affects tyroid; causes neurodevelopmental deficits BF = Biological Fluidized Bed Reactor C/F = Coagulation/Filtration
D = Disinfection
NOTES E = Electrodialysis
PHG = Public Health Goal GAC = Granular Activated Carbon MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level IE = Ion Exchange
MCLG = Maximum Contaminant Level Goal LS = Lime Softening NA = Not Appplicable or Available O/F = Oxidation/Filtration ND = Not Detected RO = Reverse Osmosis
NR = Not Required
ug/l = micrograms per liter or parts per billion
pCi/l = picoCuries per liter
DLR = Detection Limit for Purposes of Reporting
< = Value is less than the DLR
(a) The table shows highest monthly percentage of positive samples as the detected value. Samples were collected in the distribution system. (b) Cost could not be estimated
(c) Estimated cost to remove arsenic using IE.
(d) Estimated cost to remove bromate using RO.
(e) Estimated cost to remove perchlorate using IE.
(f) Estimated cost to remove gross alpha particle activity using RO, which also removes gross beta particle activity and uranium. (g) Assuming treating the entire production by IE and RO, which can remove all contaminants listed in the above table to below the detectable levels.

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

CONCENTRATION

GROUNDWATER
2022 PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS REPORT
Q:\PHG\PHG 2022\Garden Grove_phgtable_2022 No Total Coliform.xlsx

Agenda Item - 4.b.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Patricia Song
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Finance
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution
amending certain user fees
for cost recovery. (Action
Item)
Date: 7/12/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to conduct a public hearing, and to consider the adoption of the attached Resolution amending certain user fees.

BACKGROUND
The State law authorizes the City to adopt and implement fees, rates, and charges for municipal services up to the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services.

The City Council has previously approved fees and charges for various City services.

In 1994, the City Council adopted a Master Fee Schedule, which combined the City’s fees for various services into one document.

DISCUSSION
User fees and charges are payments for voluntarily purchased, publicly provided services that benefit specific individuals, rather than the general public. Sound financial management principles encourage the full recovery of the costs for providing these services, as it protects the general public’s best interest. Since the fees and charges are to be established based on actual costs, it is necessary to review the fees on a regular basis to ensure full cost recovery.

The most recent user fee update was conducted in June 2019. Costs for both labor and materials have gone up in recent years, especially for construction materials. It is necessary to review the fees and ensure they are set at the level to best recover the full cost. The City also benchmarks with surrounding Orange County cities to ensure our fees are reasonable.

The departments of Public Works and Community Services have reviewed some of their existing fees, and determined that the current amounts can no longer cover the cost of providing the services and City facility uses. The proposed changes have been carefully calculated and reviewed; justifications are documented on attached

Schedule A.

A public hearing is required for amending user fees, and a notice was published on June 29, 2022 and again on July 6, 2022, in accordance with Government Code Section 6062(a). The proposed user fee changes and documentation were made available for public review at the City Clerk’s office. Once approved, the amended fees will become effective 60 days upon the adoption of the attached resolution.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
It is estimated that the proposed fees will achieve full recovery of the various costs related to providing the prospective services and facilities.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Conduct a public hearing; and

Adopt the attached Resolution amending certain user fees.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Attachment 1 - Resolution 6/30/2022 Resolution Resolution_- _Fee_Update.pdf
Attachment 2 - Schedule A 7/6/2022 Exhibit 7-12-22_PH_User_Fees_- _Schedule_A_REVISED.pdf

•
•

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING USER FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY SERVICES

WHEREAS, State law authorizes a city to adopt and implement fees, rates, and charges for municipal services, provided that such fees, rates, and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services;

WHEREAS, the various departments of the City of Garden Grove have identified certain services provided on request to members of the public and organizations;

WHEREAS, the actual and direct costs to the City to provide these services have been calculated and analyzed, and where the cost of such services have changed, a revised fee or charge has been determined as set forth in Schedule A attached hereto;

WHEREAS, the actual and direct costs to the City to provide certain other services have been calculated and analyzed and fees or charges for such other services are set forth in Schedule A;

WHEREAS, the revised fees and charges are based on the actual or estimated reasonable cost of providing the services, including labor, materials, and overhead, and do not exceed such costs;

WHEREAS, the City Council has previously established fees and charges for various City services in Resolution No. 8726-06, as amended by Resolution Nos. 8730-06, 8731-06, 8791-07, 8794-07, 8823-08, 8861-08, 8902-09, 8999-10, 9064- 11, 9073-11, 9137-12, 9171-13, 9175-13, 9216-14, 9301-15, 9389-16, 9390-16, 9401-16, 9406-17, 9442-17, 9460-17, 9468-17, 9490-18, 9514-18, 9532-18, 9556- 19, 9575- 19 and each such established fee and charge is unaffected by this Resolution, unless such fee or charge is superseded by a revised fee or charge in Schedule A;

WHEREAS, pursuant to legal notice, a Public Hearing was held by the City Council on June 25, 2019, and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Garden Grove does hereby amend fees and charges as set forth in Schedule A attached hereto. The revised fees and charges in Schedule A supersede any fees and charges previously adopted for the same user and development processing fees.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to provide the public an easy- to understand schedule of fees, the City Clerk is directed to compile and make available upon request an updated schedule of fees and charges for City services that combines: (1) the list of previously-established service fees and charges that are not addressed by this Resolution, with (2) the list of services subject to revised fees and charges attached hereto as Schedule A. The combined list is for public information purposes, and clerical or other errors or omissions in the preparation of the list shall not have the effect of increasing, decreasing, invalidating, or waiving adopted fees or charges.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the fees attached in Schedule A shall become effective 60 days from the adoption of this Resolution.

Scheule A - Proposed Fee Schedule and Cost Documentation Public Works
Water Service Fees - Installation of Water Service
Line Current Fee Proposed Fee
1” Water Service w/1” Meter- less than 40' Copper sticks 2,639.00$ 8,700.00$ 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- less than 40' Copper sticks 3,621.00$ 9,750.00$ 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- 40' Copper sticks 3,621.00$ 10,350.00$ 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- 60' Copper sticks 3,621.00$ 10,940.00$ 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- 80' Copper sticks 3,621.00$ 11,490.00$ 2” Water Service w/2” Meter- less than 40' Copper sticks 4,261.00$ 10,000.00$ 2” Water Service w/2” Meter- 40' Copper sticks 4,261.00$ 10,450.00$ 2” Water Service w/2” Meter- 60' Copper sticks 4,261.00$ 11,000.00$ Justification
Actual City Costs
Title Labor
Equipment/
Materials Total Cost
1” Water Service w/1” Meter- less than 40' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $5,853.69 $8,705.85 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- less than 40' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $6,898.72 $9,750.88 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- 40' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $7,534.25 $10,386.41 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- 60' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $8,088.62 $10,940.78 2” Water Service w/1½” Meter- 80' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $8,642.99 $11,495.15 2” Water Service w/2” Meter- less than 40' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $7,157.61 $10,009.77 2” Water Service w/2” Meter- 40' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $7,643.06 $10,495.22 2” Water Service w/2” Meter- 60' Copper sticks $2,852.16 $8,197.43 $11,049.59 Water Service Fees - Installation of Water Service
Line Current Fee Proposed Fee
Water Grading Plan Check $60.00/hr. $92.92/hr.

Justification
Actual City Costs
Title
Hourly Rate
Principal Engineering Technician 92.92
The Water Service Installation fees are established to cover City costs for labor and materials that are required for installing new or upgraded water service connections. Current fees are established as a flat fee based on meter size. However, the actual costs of installation fluctuate, especially with the use of copper materials. Staff is proposing to amend the existing fee to reflect actual costs incurred to ensure full cost recovery.

The proposed fees reflect actual costs for the specific length of copper lines used, saw cutting, and asphalt repair. Due to the surge of Additional Dwelling Unit (ADUs) development, the City will incur additional revenue loss if full cost recovery is not achieved.

Primary personnel performing water grading plan check is the Principal Engineering Technician.

Schedule A - Proposed Fee Schedule and Cost Documentation Community Services
Rental Picnic Pavilion - Garden Grove Park Current Fee Proposed Fee Class II - Resident/Non-profit (All day use of 8 hours) 140.00$ 225.00$ Class III - Non Resident (All day use of 8 hours) 170.00$ 295.00$ Class IV - Commercial/Business (All day use of 8 hours) 175.00$ 315.00$ Rental Small Picnic Shelters
Class II - Resident/Non-profit (All day use of 8 hours) 55.00$ 75.00$ Class III - Non Resident (All day use of 8 hours) 75.00$ 95.00$ Class IV - Commercial/Business (All day use of 8 hours) 75.00$ 105.00$ Justification
Actual City Costs for the Picnic Pavilion
Title Hourly Rate
Estimated
Hours Total Cost
Principal Office Assistant $67.62 2 $135.24
Recreation Coordinator $66.06 2 $132.12
Recreation Specialist $15.95 3 $47.85
Total $315.21
Actual City Costs for the Picnic Shelters
Title Hourly Rate
Estimated
Hours Total Cost
Principal Office Assistant $67.62 0.5 $33.81
Recreation Coordinator $66.06 1 $66.06
Recreation Specialist $15.95 2 $31.90
Total $131.77
Cost of services includes processing shelter use requests, coordinating upkeep, and monitoring use and user requests. Proposed new fees are calculated based on the estimated hours required to prepare and manage the facilities. Additionally, the new fees are within the average range of rental fees for pavilions and shelters among Orange County cities.

Agenda Item - 5.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Lisa L. Kim
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community and Economic
Development
Subject: Award a contract to Select
Electric, Inc., for the
construction of Project No.
02-2022, Main Street
Electrical Project. (Cost:
$379,871) (Action Item)
Date: 7/12/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to award a contract to Select Electric, Inc. for the construction of the Main Street Electrical Project, Project No. 02-2022. Contract is between the Garden Grove Community Foundation (GGCF), Select Electric, Inc., and the City.

BACKGROUND
Historically, events held on Main Street that were sponsored by either the City of Garden Grove (City) or the Downtown Main Street Business Association that required electrical power sourced via leased generators or a system of power cords from Main Street merchants and the City’s electrical panel located in Pecor Plaza.

In April 2021, the County of Orange awarded the GGCF funds to assist the City and its local businesses to implement programs and projects that would sustain businesses and continue to attract commerce during the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.

Through the use of these funds, the City proposed a permanent and safe means of electrical power for each of the 32 tree wells located on Main Street and to service the existing electrical panel that will provide the power.

The GGCF completed the hiring of an electrical consultant, the electrical plans, and the solicitation of bids.

DISCUSSION
The proposed project includes servicing the existing electrical panel; installing underground electrical conduit lines into the built-out street improvements via boring and street trenching to avoid or minimize damage to the sidewalk decorative plaques and discontinued pavers; electrical power to all 32 tree wells; tree rope lighting; electrical boxes to selected trees; trench and new concrete ribbon restoration.

Four qualified bids were received and opened by the City Clerk’s Office on July 5, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. The lowest qualified bidder is Select Electric, Inc. The licenses and references of the contractor were reviewed and verified by staff, and all other documentation is in order.

The anticipated construction schedule is as follows:

Award Contract July 12, 2022 Begin Construction (estimated) July 25, 2022 Complete Construction (estimated) September 6, 2022

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The contract amount, along with the contingency, will be established in the not-to- exceed amount of $379,871. Funding is provided by the Small Business Relief Program Grant funds awarded to the Garden Grove Community Foundation, and general funds included in the Economic Development operational budget.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Award a contract to Select Electric, Inc., in the amount of $379,871, for the construction of Project No. 02-2022, Main Street Electrical Project between the Garden Grove Community Foundation (GGCF), Select Electric Inc., and the City; and
Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract and to make minor modifications as necessary and appropriate on behalf of the City.

By: Paul Guerrero, Real Property Agent
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Contract 7/6/2022 Agreement Construction_Contract_July_12__2022.docx Main Street
Electrical
Improvement
Project Plans
7/6/2022 Backup Material Main_Street_Electrical_Improvements_Project_Plans.pdf Bid Results 7/6/2022 Backup Material Bid_Results.pdf

•
•

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

THIS CONTRACT is made this ___ day of ______________, 2022, by the GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, a non -profit organization, referred to as ("FOUNDATION"), SELECT ELECTRIC, INC., hereinafter referred to as ("CONTRACTOR"), and the City of Garden Grove (“CITY”)

RECITALS:

1. FOUNDATION desires to utilize the services of CONTRACTOR to facilitate enhancement and promotion to the historic Main Street and adjace nt businesses during COVID-19 recovery process. The CONTRACTOR will provide all material, parts, and labor to provide electrical improvements per Attachment “A”. The program is intended to encourage foot traffic to support directly and indirectly the econo mic recovery of local small businesses, provide opportunities to retain and create local jobs, as well as promote Garden Grove’s local and regional tourism economy.

2. CONTRACTOR is qualified by virtue of experience, training, education, and expertise to accomplish services.

AGREEMENT

THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

4.0 Compensation. CONTRACTOR shall be compensated as follows:

Compensation under this Contract shall be a Not To Exceed (NTE) amount of Three Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy One Dollars and zero cents ($379,871), payable in arrears and in accordance with Bid Proposal (Attachment “A”), which is attached and is hereby incorporated by reference. Payment for work under this Contract shall be made per invoice or request for work completed subject to Section 4.11 hereof. All work shall be in accordance with Garden Grove Community Foundation Project No. 02-2022 Main Street – Electrical Project and the Plans and Specifications (Attachment “B”), which are attached and are hereby incorporated by reference. For work under this Contract, payment shall be made per invoice for work completed. Within 45 day of delivery of goods or completion of performance of services, CONTRACTOR must promptly render an invoice to FOUNDATION or payment may be significantly delayed. For extra work not a part of this Agreement, a written authorization by FOUNDATION will be required, and payment shall be based on schedule included in Scope of Work (Attachment “A”).

4.1 General Conditions. CONTRACTOR certifies and agrees that all the terms, conditions and obligations of the Contract Documents as hereinafter defined, the location of the job site, and the conditions under which the work is to be performed have been thoroughly reviewed, and enters into this Contract based upon CONTRACTOR'S investigation of all such matters and is in no way relying upon any opinions or representations of FOUNDATION. It is agreed that this Contract represents the entire agreement. It is further agreed that the Contract Documents including the Notice Inviting Bids, Special Instructions to Bidders, if any, Plans and Specifications, and Contractor's Proposal, are incorporated in this Contract by reference, with the same force and ef fect as if the same were set forth at length herein, and that

CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors, if any, will be and are bound by any and all of said Contract Documents insofar as they relate in any part or in any way, directly or indirectly, to the work covered by this Contract.

"Project" as used herein defines the entire scope of the work covered by all the Contract Documents. Anything mentioned in the Specifications and not indicated in the Plans, or indicated in the Plans and not mentioned in the Specifications, shall be of like effect as if indicated and mentioned in both. In case of discrepancy in the Plans or Specifications, the matter shall be immediately submitted to FOUNDATION's Engineer, without whose decision CONTRACTOR shall not adjust said discrepancy save only at CONTRACTOR'S own risk and expense. The decision of the Engineer shall be final.

4.2 Materials and Labor. CONTRACTOR shall furnish, under the conditions expressed in the Plans and Specifications, at CONTRACTOR'S own expense, all labor and materials necessary, except such as are mentioned in the Specifications to be furnished by the FOUNDATION, to complete the project, in good workmanlike and substantial order. If CONTRACTOR fails to pay for labor or materials when due, FOUNDATION may settle such claims by making demand upon the surety to this Agreement. In the event of the failure of refusal of the surety to satisfy said claims, FOUNDATION may settle them directly and deduct the amount of payments from the Contract price and any amounts due to CONTRACTOR. In the event FOUNDATION receives a stop notice from any laborer or material supplier alleging non -payment by CONTRACTOR, FOUNDATION shall be entitled to deduct all of its costs and expenses incurred relating thereto, including but not limited to administrative and legal fees.

4.3 Project. The PROJECT is described as: MAIN STREET ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PROJECT NO. 02-2022.

4.4 Plans and Specifications. The work to be done is describ ed in a set of detailed Plans and Specifications entitled: MAIN STREET ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PROJECT NO. 02 - 2022.

Said Plans and Specifications and any revisions, amendments or addenda thereto are attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Contract and referred to by reference. The work to be done must also be in accordance with the General Provisions, Standard Specifications and Standard Plans of FOUNDATION which are also incorporated herein and referred to by reference.

4.5 Time of Commencement and Completion. CONTRACTOR agrees to commence the Project with fourteen (14) calendar days from the date set forth in the "Notice to Proceed" sent by FOUNDATION and shall diligently prosecute the work to completion within thirty (30) working days, excluding delays caused or authorized by the FOUNDATION as set forth in Sections 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9 hereof. The completion dates shall include any material delivery.

4.6 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Contract. As required by the Contract Documents, CONTRACTOR shall prepare and obtain approval of all shop drawings, details and samples, and do all other things necessary and incidental to the prosecution of CONTRACTOR'S work in conformance with an approved construction

progress schedule. CONTRACTOR shall coordinate the work covered by this Contract with that of all other contractors, subcontractors and of the FOUNDATION, in a manner that will facilitate the efficient completion of the entire work i n accordance with Section 4.5 herein. FOUNDATION shall have complete control of the premises on which the work is to be performed and shall have the right to decide the time or order in which the various portions of the work shall be installed or the priority of the work of other subcontractors, and, in general, all matters representing the timely and orderly conduct of the work of CONTRACTOR on the premises.

4.7 Excusable Delays. CONTRACTOR shall be excused for any delay in the prosecution or completion of the Project caused by acts of God; inclement weather; damages caused by fire or other casualty for which CONTRACTOR is not responsible; and act, neglect or default of FOUNDATION; failure of FOUNDATION to make timely payments to CONTRACTOR; late delivery of materials required by this CONTRACT to be furnished by FOUNDATION; combined action of the workers in no way caused by or resulting from default or collusion on the part of CONTRACTOR; a lockout by FOUNDATION; or any other delays unforeseen by CONTRACTOR and beyond CONTRACTOR'S reasonable control.

FOUNDATION shall extend the time fixed in Section 4.5 herein for completion of the Project by the number of days CONTRACTOR has thus been delayed, provided that CONTRACTOR presents a written request to FOUNDATION for such time extension within fifteen (15) days of the commencement of such delay and FOUNDATION finds that the delay is justified. FOUNDATION 'S decision will be conclusive on the parties to this Contract. Failure to file such request within the time allowed shall be deemed a waiver of the claim by CONTRACTOR.

No claims by CONTRACTOR for additional compensation or damages for delays will be allowed unless CONTRACTOR satisfies FOUNDATION that such delays were unavoidable and not the result of any action or inaction of CONTRACTOR and that CONTRACTOR took all available measures to mitigate such damages. Extensions of time and extra compensation as a result of incurring undisclosed utilities will be determined in accordance with Section 9-103A of the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications. The FOUNDATION'S decision will be conclusive on all parties to this Contract.

4.8 Extra Work. The Contract price includes compensation for all work performed by CONTRACTOR, unless CONTR ACTOR obtains a written change order signed by a designated representative of FOUNDATION specifying the exact nature of the extra work and the amount of extra compensation to be paid all as more particularly set forth in Section 4.9 hereof. FOUNDATION shall extend the time fixed in Section 4.5 for completion of the Project by the number of days reasonably required for CONTRACTOR to perform the extra work, as determined by FOUNDATION 'S Engineer.

The decision of the Engineer shall be final.

4.9 Changes in Project.

4.9.1 FOUNDATION may at any time, without notice to any surety, by written order designated or indicated to be a change order, make any change in the work within the general scope of the Contract, including but not limited to changes:
a. in the Specifications (including drawings and designs); b. in the time, method or manner of performance of the work;

c. in the FOUNDATION -furnished facilities, equipment, materials, services or site; or
d. directing acceleration in the performance of the work.

4.9.2 A change order shall also be any other written order (including direction, instruction, interpretation or determination) from the FOUNDATION which causes any change, provided CONTRACTOR gives the FOUNDATION written notice stating the date, circumsta nces and source of the order and that CONTRACTOR regards the order as a change order.

4.9.3 Except as provided in this Section 4.9, no order, statement or conduct of the FOUNDATION or its representatives shall be treated as a change under this Section 9 or entitle CONTRACTOR to an equitable adjustment.

4.9.4 If any change under this Section 4.9 causes an increase or decrease in CONTRACTOR'S actual, direct cost or the time required to perform any part of the work under this Contract, whether or not chan ged by any order, the FOUNDATION shall make an equitable adjustment and modify the Contract in writing. Except for claims based on defective specifications, no claim for any change under paragraph (4.9.2) above shall be allowed for any costs incurred more than 20 days before the CONTRACTOR gives written notice as required in paragraph (4.9.2). In the case of defective specifications for which the FOUNDATION is responsible, the equitable adjustment shall include any increased direct cost CONTRACTOR reasonabl y incurred in attempting to comply with those defective specifications.

4.9.5 If CONTRACTOR intends to assert a claim for an equitable adjustment under this Section 4.9, it must, within thirty (30) days after receipt of a written change order under paragraph (4.9.1) or the furnishing of a written notice under paragraph (4.9.2), submit a written statement to the FOUNDATION setting forth the general nature and monetary extent of such claim. The FOUNDATION may extend the 30-day period. CONTRACTOR may include the statement of claim in the notice under paragraph (4.9.2) of this Section 4.9.

4.9.6 No claim by CONTRACTOR for an equitable adjustment shall be allowed if made after final payment under this Agreement.

4.9.7 CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to make any and all changes, furnish the materials and perform the work that FOUNDATION may require without nullifying this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall adhere strictly to the Plans and Specifications unless a change therefrom is authorized in writing by the FOUNDATION. Under no condition shall CONTRACTOR make any changes to the Project, either in additions or deduction, without the written order of the FOUNDATION and the FOUNDATION shall not pay for any extra charges made by CONTRACTOR that have not been agreed upon in advance in writing by the FOUNDATION. CONTRACTOR shall submit immediately to the FOUNDATION written copies of its firm's cost or credit proposal for change in the work.

Disputed work shall be performed as ordered in writing by the FOUNDATION and the proper cost or credit breakdowns therefor shall be submitted without delay by CONTRACTOR to FOUNDATION.

4.10 Liquidated Damages for Delay. The parties agree that if the total work called for under this Contract, in all parts and requirements, is not completed within the time specified in Section 4.5 herein, plus the allowance made for delays or extensions authorized under Section 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9 herein, the FOUNDATION will sustain damage which would be extremely difficult and impractical to ascertain. The parties therefore agree that CONTRACTOR will pay to FOUNDATION the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) per day for each and every calendar day during which completion of the Project is so delayed. CONTRACTOR agrees to pay such liquidated damages and further agrees that FOUNDATION may offset the amount of liquidated damages from any moneys due or that may become due CONTRACTOR under the Contract.

4.11 Contract Price and Method of Payment. FOUNDATION agrees to pay and the CONTRACTOR agrees to accept as full consideration for the faithful performance of this Contract, subject to any subsequent additions or deductions as provided in approved change orders, the sum as itemized in the bid proposal. Progress payments shall be made to the CONTRACTOR per month for each successive month as the work progresses. The CONTRACTOR shall be paid such sum as will bring the total payments received since the commencement of the work up to ninety five percent (95%) of the value of the work completed, less all previous payments, provided that the CONTRACTOR submits the request for payment prior to the end of the day required to meet the payment schedule. The FOUNDATION will retain five percent (5%) of the amount of each such progress estimate and material cost until 30 days after the recordation of the Notice of Completion.

Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the FOUNDATION'S Engineer, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract. Partial payments of the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.

4.12 Substitution of Securities in Lieu of Retention of Funds. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, the CONTRACTOR will be entitled to post approved securities with the FOUNDATION or an approved financial institution in order to have the FOUNDATION release funds retained by the FOUNDATION to ensure performance of the Contract. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an addendum to this Contract together with escrow instructions and any other documents in order to effect this substitution.

4.13 Completion. FOUNDATION may require affidavits or certificates of payment and/or releases from any subcontractor, laborer or material supplier in connection with Stop Notices, which have been filed under the provisions of the statutes of the State of California.

4.14 Contractor's Employee Compensation.

4.14.1 General Prevailing Rate. FOUNDATION has ascertained CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the California Labor Code and all applicable federal requirements respecting the payment of prevailing wages. If there is a difference between the minimum wage rates predetermined by the Secretary of Labor and the prevailing wage rates determined by the Director of the

Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) for similar classifications of labor, the CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors shall pay not less than the higher wage rate. The DIR will not accept lower State wage rates not specifically included in the Federal minimum wage determinations. This includes "helper" (or other classifications based on hours of experience) or any other classification not appearing in the Federal Wage determinations. Where Federal wage determinations do not contain the State wage rate determination otherwise available for use by the CONTRACTOR and Subcontractors, the CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors shall pay not less than the Federal Minimum wage rate which most closely approximates the duties of the employees in question.

4.14.2 Forfeiture for Violation . CONTRACTOR shall, as a penalty to the FOUNDATION, forfeit one hundred dollars ($100.00) for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker paid (either by the CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor under it) less than the prevailing rate of per diem wages as set by the Director of Industrial Relations, in accordance with Sections 1770-1780 of the California Labor Code for the work provided for in this Contract, all in accordance with Section 1775 of the Labor Code of the State of California.

4.14.3 Apprentices. Section 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the Labor Code of the State of California, regarding the employment of apprentices is applicable to this Contract and the CONTRACTOR shall comply therewith; provided, however, that this requirement shall not apply if and/or to the extent that the Contract of the general CONTRACTOR, or the contracts of specialty contractors not bidding for work through a general or prime contractor involves less than thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00).

4.14.4 Workday. In the performance of this Contract, not more than eight (8) hours shall constitute a day's work, and CONTRACTOR shall not require more than eight (8) hours of labor in a day from any person employed by him thereunder except as provided in paragraph (4.14.1) above.

CONTRACTOR shall conform to Article 3, Chapter 1, Part 7 (Sections 1810 et sep.) of the Labor Code of the State of California and shall forfeit to the FOUNDATION as a penalty, the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of this Contract by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor for each calendar day during which any worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one week in violation of said Article. CONTRACTOR shall keep an accurate record showing the name and actual hours worked each calendar day and each calendar week by each worker employed by CONTRACTOR in connection with the Project.

4.14.5 Record of Wages: Inspection . CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker or other employee employed by it in connection with the Project and agrees to require that each of its subcontractors does the same. The applicable CONTRACTOR or subcontractor or its agent having authority over such matters shall certify all payroll records as accurate.

CONTRACTOR further agrees that its payroll records and those of its subcontractors shall be available to the employee or employee's representative, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, and the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and shall comply with all of the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, in general. CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, and shall submit payroll records to the Labor Commissioner pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4(a)(3).

4.14.6 CONTRACTOR REGISTRAT ION; MAINTENANCE OF PAYROLL RECORDS; JOB SITE POSTING

4.14.6.1 Contractor Registration. CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors must be registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. This Agreement shall not be effective until CONTRACTOR provides proof of registration to the FOUNDATION.

4.14.6.2 Payroll Records. CONTRACTOR shall maintain accurate payroll records and shall comply with all of the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, and shall submit payroll records to the Labor Commissioner pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4(a)(3).

4.14.6.3 Posting of Job Site Notices. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the job site notices posting requirements established by the Labor Commissioner pursuant to Title 8, California Code of Regulations Section 16461(e) or other regulation promulgated pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4(a)(2).

4.14.6.4 Notice of DIR Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement .

Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4, this Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the California Department of Industrial Relations.

4.15 Surety Bonds . CONTRACTOR shall, upon entering into performance of this Agreement, furnish bonds in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract price bid, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work, and the other in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract price bid to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished. This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approve by the FOUNDATION.

The Surety Company must have an AM Best rating of A- VII or better.

4.16 Insurance.

4.16.1 CONTRACTOR is also aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or undertake self-insurance with provisions of that Code and will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract.

4.16.2 CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors will carry and provide Workers' Compensation insurance for the protection of its employees during the progress of the work and provide Employers Liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000. The insurer shall waive its rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, agents and employees and shall issue a certificate to the policy evidencing same.

4.16.3 For any claims related to this Agreement, CONTRACTOR’S insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect s FOUNDATION, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the FOUNDATION, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall by excess of the CONTRACTOR’S insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4.16.4 Before CONTRACTOR performs any work at, or prepares or delivers materials to, the site of construction, CONTRACTOR shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage and such certificates of insurance and endorsements shall provide the name and policy number of each carrier and that the insurance is in force and will not be cancelled without 30 days written notice to the FOUNDATION. CONTRACTOR shall maintain all of the foregoing insurance in force until the work under this contract is satisfactorily and fully completed to the satisfaction of the FOUNDATION. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of FOUNDATION by Contractor under Section 4.17 of this Contract. Notwithstanding nor diminishing the obligations of CONTRACTOR with respect to the foregoing, CONTRACTOR shall subscribe for and maintain in full force and effect during the life of this Contract, the following insurance in amounts not less than the amounts specified and issued by a company having a Best's Guide Rate of A-, Class VII or better (claims made and modified occurrence policies are not acceptable).

4.16.5 COMMENCEMENT OF WORK . CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this Agreement until all certificates and endorsements have been received and approved by the FOUNDATION. All insurance required by this Agreement shall contain a Statement of Obligation on the part of the carrier to notify the FOUNDATION of any material change, cancellation, or termination at least thirty (30) days in advance. Contractor shall also provide a waiver of subrogation for each policy.

4.16.6 INSURANCE AMOUNTS . CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors shall maintain the following insurance in the amount and type for the duration of this Agreement:

(a) Commercial general liability in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, and not excluding XCU; (claims made and modified occurrence policies are not acceptable); Insurance companies must be acceptable to FOUNDATION and have an AM Best’s Guide Rating of A-, Class VII or better, as approved by the FOUNDATION.

(b) Automobile liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit; (claims made and modified occurrence policies are

not acceptable); Insurance companies must be acceptable to FOUNDATION and have an AM Best’s Guide Rating of A-, Class VII or better, as approved by the FOUNDATION.

An Additional Insured Endorsement, On-going and Products - Completed Operations, for the policy under section 4.16.6 (a) shall designate FOUNDATION and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, their officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for this contract and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their directors, officers, agents, and employees, as determined by the FOUNDATION, as additional insureds for liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall provide to FOUNDATION proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to FOUNDATION’s requirements, as approved by the FOUNDATION.

An Additional Insured Endorsement for the policy under section 4.16.6 (b) shall designate FOUNDATION and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE , their officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for this contract and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their directors, officers, agents, and employees, as determined by the FOUNDATION, as additional insureds for automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall provide to FOUNDATION proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to FOUNDATION’s requirements, as approved by the FOUNDATION.

An Additional Insured Endorsement for the policy under section 4.16.6 (c) shall designate FOUNDATION and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE , their officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for this contract and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their directors, officers, agents, and employees, as determined by the FOUNDATION, as additional insureds for liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall provide to FOUNDATION proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to FOUNDATION’s requirements, as approved by the FOUNDATION and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE.

For any claims related to this Agreement, CONTRACTOR’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects FOUNDATION, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for this contract and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their directors, officers, agents, and employees. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the FOUNDATION, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers, for this contract and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their directors, officers, agents, and employees, as determined by the FOUNDATION shall be excess of the CONTRACTOR’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

If CONTRACTOR maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, CONTRACTOR shall provide coverage for the higher insurance limits otherwise maintained by the CONTRACTOR.

---

4.17 Risk and Indemnification. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of the Project or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify and keep FOUNDATION and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, their Officers, Agents, Employees, Engineers, and Consultants for this Contract, and all public agencies from whom permits will be obtained and their directors, Officers, Agents and Employees harmless against any and all liability, claims, judgments, costs and demands, including demands arising from injuries or death of persons (CONTRACTOR'S employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigation arising through the active negligence or sole willful misconduct of FOUNDATION an d will make good to reimburse FOUNDATION for any expenditures, including reasonable attorneys' fees FOUNDATION may incur by reason of such matters, and if requested by FOUNDATION, will defend any such suits at the sole cost and expense of CONTRACTOR.

4.18 Termination.

4.18.1 This Contract may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the FOUNDATION for its convenience, provided that the CONTRACTOR is given (1) not less than ten (10) calendar days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination.

Termination of contract shall conform to Section 8 -1.11 of the State of California, Department of Transportation Standard Specifications.

4.18.2 If termination for default or convenience is effected by the FOUNDATION, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Contract shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due to the CONTRACTOR at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the FOUNDATION because of the CONTRACTOR'S default. The equitable adjustment for any termination shall provide for payment to the CONTRACTOR for services rendered and expenses incurred in accordance with section 8-1.11 of the State of California, Department of Transportation Standard Specifications.

4.18.3 Upon receipt of a termination action under paragraph (4.18.1) or (4.18.2) above, the CONTRACTOR shall (1) promptly discontinue all affected work (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or otherwise make available to the FOUNDATION all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the CONTRACTOR in performing this Contract whether completed or in process.

4.18.4 Upon termination under paragraphs (4.18.1) and (4.18.2) above, the FOUNDATION may take over the work and m ay award another party an agreement to complete the work under this Contract.

4.19 Warranty. The CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all work under this Contract in accordance with the FOUNDATION 'S designs, drawings and specifications.

The CONTRACTOR guarantees for a period of one (1) year from the date of the notice of completion of the work that the completed work is free from all defects due to faulty materials, equipment or workmanship and that he shall promptly make whatever adjustments or corrections which may be necessary to cure any defects, including repairs or any damage to other parts of the system resulting from such defects. The FOUNDATION shall promptly give notice to the CONTRACTOR of observed defects. In the event that the CONTRACTOR fails to make adjustments, repairs, corrections or other work made necessary by such defects, the FOUNDATION may do so and charge the CONTRACTOR the cost incurred. The performance bond shall remain in full force and effect through the guarantee period.

The CONTRAC TOR'S obligations under this clause are in addition to the CONTRACTOR'S other express or implied assurances provided under this Contract and in no way diminish any other rights that the FOUNDATION may have against the CONTRACTOR for faulty materials, equipment or work.

4.20 Attorneys' Fees. If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, each party shall be responsible for their own attorneys' fees, costs and necessary expenses. If any action is brought against the CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to enforce a Stop Notice or Notice to Withhold, which named the FOUNDATION as a party to said action, the FOUNDATION shall be entitled to all attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements arising out of the defense or such action by the FOUNDATION. The FOUNDATION shall be entitled to deduct its costs for any Stop Notice filed, whether court action is involved or not.

4.21 Notices. Any notice required or permitted under this Contract may be given by ordinary mail at the address set forth below. Any party whose address changes shall notify the other party in writing.

a. (Address of City is as follows): (with a copy to):

Garden Grove Community Foundation Garden Grove City Attorney 11222 Acacia Parkway 11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92840 Garden Grove, CA 92840

b. (Address of CONTRACTOR is as follows):

Select Electric, Inc.

Attention: Sam Passamisi
2790 Business Park Drive
Vista, CA 92081

4.22 Appropriations. This Agreement is subject to and contingent upon funds being appropriated therefor by the FOUNDATION for each fiscal year covered by the term of this Agreement. If such appropriations are not made, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without penalty to the FOUNDATION and the C ITY OF GARDEN GROVE.

\ \ \ \

IN WITNESS THEREOF, these parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year shown below.

"FOUNDATION"

GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

By:___________________________
GGCF President

Date:_______________________

“CITY”

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

By:___________________________
City Manager – Scott C. Stiles

Date:_______________________

"CONTRACTOR"
SELECT ELECTRIC, INC.

By:___________________________

Name:__________________________

Title:___________________________

Date:__________________________

Tax ID No.: ______________________

DIR Registration No.:__________

Expiration Date:_________________

Contractor’s Classification:___________

Contractor’s License:_____________

Expiration Date:_________________

If CONTRACTOR is a corporation, a
Corporate Resolution and/or
Corporate Seal is required. If a
partnership, Statement of Partnership
must be submitted to FOUNDATION.

ATTACHMENT A

CONTRACTOR 'S PROPOSAL
CONTRACTOR'S NAME: ~S=e=le=ct~E=lect=r=ic~ln=c'-. ------- - ---­

THE HONORABLE PRESIDENT AND GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITT FOUNDATION

BOARD MEMBERS
11222 ACACIA PARKWAY
GARDEN GROVE, CAUFORNIA 92842
SUBJECT PROJECT: GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PROJECT NO. 02·202 2 MAIN STREET - ELECTRICAL PROJECT
Contractors:

The undersigned, having carefully examined the Plans and Specifications for the above subject Project and having personally visited the site of the work and been made familiar with the conditions, HEREBY PROPOSE to furn ish all labor, design, mater ials, equipment, and transportation, and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with the said Plans and Specifications for the unit prices named in the following bid proposal :

ITEM

1. 2.

3. s.

6. APPROX.

QUANTITY
1 LS.
l
LS.
l
L.S,
1 EA.
1 EA.

TOTAL BID PROPOSAL

UNIT ITEM
ITEM WITH UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS BELOW ♦ PRICE TOTAL Mobilization/ Demobilization
•1,; fw.£t) m 11~t:.'1 t:::i'l~
Oto ~~ ~ Sl5.w:2~
~
s 15,000.

Perlumesum
Traffic Control and Plan \)\
~~fuNi.,fd ->~ a~
$ ~ ?W-,l) S iaSC() .i.O
PerLumeSum
Modify Existing Service cabinet as Needed
~~ :r\\1l1~r:d1::ril. HA ~ fd
~~~ rt\L 'i::>3.\1\6 !'l<{',d, ~ am_~ s :O:;>ll>I."" s ?°?\ill."" Per LumeSum
Install #6 Pull Box
~~ .. »"<1or4 -S"'--\\o.ro~< d

APPROX.

ITEM QUANTITY ITEM WITH UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS BELOW ♦ UNIT
PRICE
ITEM
TOTAL

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.
1,050
LF.
600
LF.
so
LF.
1S0
LF.
lnst~ll 3/4N Galvanized Rigid Steel Conduit
•.£,c,'i\:\:\ '"\\-,\\) \))~ Qrd -ZU-O (8.1\~
__ "'J_ --::::J ___________ $ ~ °"
Per Linear Foot
Per Linear Foot
Install 3" PVC Schedule 80 Conduit
~ ~&~-nY< Dow>,K s 1ars . .P s to~o. w
Per Linear Foot
Install 2• PVC Schedule 80 Conduit Jack & Boring
•B<a~-nYt. \"xi\\Oxs w ?tM?M s <;;."".,,,
~ 1.J~J - s !d,1'5D.w
Per linear Foot
SO Install 3• PVC Schedule 80 Conduit Jack & Boring
L.F. •t"'° ~uo l"\c.Nen \)c\\\o,.vs&ld
..... 1-f->.ll'O..,....__.c .... oo...,~"-'>---------- s J\1."° s lO,'::>So • .., 27 EA.

Per Linear Foot
Install Bell Weatherproof Box and Cover .
•i:»s,:3¼, sw:4 % '1 u. \\ux:Qxed ~"5 fuo. lus,\\Q,.K ru-d, '2.0..l(t} Cb\"h $ Per Each

13. 8 Install L-COM Weatherproof Enclosure

14. 15.

16. EA. ~\It. ~'SW S.e~ 'OM UJ\\1\16, ~
9#4:'.U!!r? CA>'¥, S 511. S 4Sto%.,.
2 EA.
1 LS.
1,000
LF.

Per Each
Install Bell Weatherproof Box Duplex GFCI Outlet/Cover
~~- \\uoox«J b;)\\firS ooa
....~ ....,.,,. ..... ~ "'4...LI .,,.__- _______ s tf'J()O,;, s 980D." Per Each
Install Wiring
•iwu~t.~,:Bso 'nw:-aud l1fN s /t"l,s~ ~ $ l",CC..c..., 'fS,rs ~ ONA 1&\'.P W\!', ----:::J !!!. _ ~ a J J-J.

Per Linear Foot
Trenching & Restoration Concrete Ribbon
t!fifu D~ Ord 2.eti> 00,~ s ~ ';f\ . '° S~C\,OCQ,"'
Per Linear Foot

ITEM

17. 18.

19. 20.

APPROX.

QUANTITY
70 L.F.
33 EA
1 EA.
1 LS.

ITEM WITH UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS BELOW ♦
Install 3/4" Flexible Conduit
•:v&~ ~1/.t. t:u.\O,~ acd 7-W"D lU\tr
Per Linear Foot
Install Tree Rope Lighting
•1:.\eien \\J.vvlv!t.1 m\"11iS. ak'.d :z£1lD ooJf.S
Per Each
Install Photo Electric Cell
•Oc\l.... m1u.."i!.W\£11lru.. ~dv~ ~
l~U.L: l.::l!)\lli.a,. Q.cd, 2e,rf\ CtxrK
Per Each
City Public Works Encroachment Perm it

UNIT ITEM

PRICE TOTAL
$ =F."l.,..:; $ ~i~."1)
$ ~~00 ."' $ ~!,11,00D ,~
$ ~~~~ .'° s n~~ ...
•1wuy\,~fut, \\i.odxwl UJ\\(ltSlWi
1~ ~ sa,599." s a$QO.'°
Per Lump Sum

21. 1
LS.

City Build~ Department Penmit-Service Panel
•rfVl, ll'lall>%4 Do\\AAS, a"4
Perlum Sum
TOTAL BID PROPOSAL: $ ~'f? 1 ~ 1:, Y, · G\
Total Bid Proposal Written in Words Below•:
•1£yee,.'A}1cd:trc.t:fum ful, 1-bo\Aacd Jfuu. \\uc4Y4 h:\\.\ 9W UO\,'lks9ol1 lbt)C~-t~ The foregoing quantities are approximate only, being given as a basis for the comparison of bids, and the FOUNDATION does not expressly or by lmpUcatlon, agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class of portion of the work as may be deemed necessary or expedient by the Foundation's representative.

NOTES:

1.Contract will be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, based on amount shown under TOTAL BID

PROPOSAL

2.ln case of discrepancy between the words and figures, the words shall prevail.

Contractor's Proposal (Revised - No. 2)

ATTACHMENT B
(PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS)

GENERAL NOTES·
• ,.._.,. .. __,.,,.......,_,o, K .. <A. __ ..,. ... ....,,. ,._,......,.....,. .,,_ ~-"" --" ___ f---o.JCZ::""'-""""" - ~ ..... - .....

L "K<a-...._11) 1n "1 . 111"_.....,_., __ """"' 1f_,., _ _ _ ..._IIH-~ .,. _ .,_ .,.._Nd:!.,.,.. _ _ __ , ____ ..,,. • -- __ """'.., ..__,...,_ , ,. .,. ____ II' ___ ... ...., ., <G
L _...._,. .., _ ,., K ___ _ & K _JI_M_Ol-.,:_.,.
=.:.:.:.. ~~-:.~~':.':':-::. -:.:;,,~.:.:.': .="' - " C ity Of Garde n Grove . .. ,., _ __ ,.. ___ ..m~""' a') _ _ .. ..,._., ___ _
~=~~~ ~~~ ~--=~~i:.,,.~--
L "K <a- ■ IH'OllsaJ: .. _,. ,.. ___ ,._,_, _.,._ ,.. _.,..,._ ,. =::.::::~-----......... - ...... -,,., .. """_~- .

I .,,,.., ___ ""'" n: ""'_""__, "°,..._ .. .,_ .. _M_ 'ft'><)"' · -

MAIN STREET ELECTRI CAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
. _____ ,.,, ... ...,.... ,._....,., __ ,.,, ...................... _,,.,. « 1u-.- , _.,_ .. _ .... -.:
,a ,,,.._ ...... ..,...., ._.._ __ M _,.,.._ ..._ _ ___ _ /EM - -- M 0:,,1' ____ ,...,,.,.,,.....,...,,L_ ..., __ Jl•,_.. ... __ , ... _,.111 __ _._,,._,, M,..,,._, _,,_,~ .. ---- -~ .. --.~-....... ., ...... ,.._ .. _ _ ____ ,. _ __ ,,,, _ _ _ , r,, ___ __ __,,_,..._u,c,_g K __ .. M n ,.._

LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES
L ... ....,...._ .. ,.,.,... .,,C (ll,IE .. _, • ..,....., ...... _ __ ... M ....... '""-l .. .... . _,,...,,.. _ • ............ _,,...,....., ,.. .... . .._ __ _
... _...._ .,..._ _ .. <lK1'COolDD ___ _,_f/ 1fl_, .,,.._ _ ,_ _ _, .. ---------- - --.. - .... , ... -... . ... i,.._.,, ... rlU_ , • ..,. ___ .,._, ................ ,..., .. _.,.,.. llJCIIDl._, __ ., ..... ., ................. llJCIIDI. ,. ____ .,._ ..._ __ , _ _... ____ ,. __ .,...,..,..,,. .... ..,.,,._. .. ... ........... "' .... ...... ,.-........... .....
.. _.. ...... .... "-'<O Q.OIO- ~ ---•uo:i
U-SamAlon
® - -.Hl•w,
Callw_,.., .,_
IWN STIIBKT FROll J.C.lCI! PARXJ!Y TO GJJU!EN GROV! BOULEVARD PROJECT No. CP GGCF MSLl 001-202 1

PROJECT SITE
I . '" ; I , ... ....:=_
t\ . . , ... ' .1, ,
:·-. 1 "\
,r
t
., , //
• rr
I -'f I j
I I .

JI "
J
I ~

LOCATION MAP
NOffi:i ».L[
lfil
UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATK>N
-------~- ... 1'0:i::TOfc. t.
~N
{PU )­
(PU) --..., .
(Pl•) ­
(Pl•) -­
{Pl•l" ... _
{ Pl•)-PI N
(Plo)l- nl>
1/2'/lOU
---..--
MAIN Sil1.E6T ELECI1tlCAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT I DA~..,.~ ~ TilUS HEET

-··-- ~·\
IO< - :iutLo .. -... Cf<l '1<-T\11
~~:"J~~·-:=~.W:1 •= '"
ntll. WO' (_.._~ l
)I; ' ~
,_~~ ~ f"~';'°"
l1ill!I.JI'. _aun.,,._,_....._ _
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE --:~.~~\\
D
:-:-·.~~
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
0;;;;::;,,:::.."::.-:·~;·::::::::.:_
0 =•-
□ ~-~ ~ .. · ­
□ ~-~ ~~· -· -0 = = ~•- -·
m~~-;;-; ~ ~°';"! :!,-:;:..i:;..(•""'f:l.,._ ... l'(I _ o ........... f" .... _'ID_ .,..,_ _,~ ... - - -
0 ~ !"..~rc:~~t~~.--..::!lr ... ~.t-!{~"
@::: .. : ::=,.::: ~ r-e-y~ .. , c,cus ,_
EJ:::"~f,~ .':'~ l:;~~"2 ~-~n=. ''"
/::'J:'.:' □=,';.;!~!':c!:! "~";,.., ,~, ~c,.-,w, ouu.
13 ~~r--,1-:,..--;.&-~~>-;;;~1~/"
,o. • ..__,,......,,_.,.._ ,...,,...n, ,. .u,,,c-, w, c•, u / .,..,.,_,,_,, r---+--+----------+-----------; -~
fill =OJ~z:~°i-~:w ......... ...:r1J.:~ ;-~
~ ~•t;,,J~~.~t -=r -::l!f ~~ -11:1
r~ --= ~ • El ~=J!~~~>-;:; '='t~~/ ..
m--~ 11£C'N:.._.., ,.., ""'""
:~~~~w .. -;.., .:c,~ •
.,._.-,;m, / ou.-="-''"""-.._ _ ..,. ...,...,
0,,-,.~ •1.i:•-O:-O-t» -
-~-.... .__. .. " _..,_ .,...,, ........ .,,. ..... a: , .. , _ __ .. ,,.,>O ·;::,.":.'!i" , . ..,,".";!..... ..... ,_,..,._ ,._..
"~~;j'"' ,.rn"':!,...,, __ ,_,. ...,. ,_,..,. - • """"
01·") , • ..,"."",~ .... - •>JO-" ...,_ ,_,_ . -• U t+ffl . """
L':'f'!U'i! ! M'!"i B""9C M'S '
CJ ~,:,.: ~u:111 -.u.., ~l.»t'M
<>-0
l1l
~,,q,- r n-i:r,-u:~ "'-Ui,;,o('l"><m;
~-.. ,.,..,,,._,,_._._
D:......, ........ ..:....., ....... -,0 .. . ...,..,_
D
o--0
l1l
.,...,
•
0 ~i-mu -.u.eo- ,- c~i~-..rr..,,,
6 "'""''"'""'_ " ... ""
"!'.l!Kil9"!1if':'!Q ■.....,ue•
.....,,., ........ , .. ...., ____ ~
~ -"'-'11~$ T-s:,IUH() - C>A£,
0 c:,;r;- NO:: •., ~ = --~
_ , ... ----~­
~-~ ll<o;- •.l" toOJ• l'lf;( .....
____ 0 .,...,.-.......-ro -
=-= =:;=~=.::::~-- ~------------ ~~= c-J
--·- -.,.. G GI.XIIEMIC
, • ...., n:at UHN> l'UL ICO -., -
~ "°'• 1PCnu;ir,w_ - wru:_1_ ,
""(IO(l'l ll) M).O W<lElu:>rN:l '<.U. P SU " ;.tl><Q C<>JF'-(•1 =C>~ =-.';;' ..... ....,_""" l°a'ffiC~ lff
,.., .... l"Mrl'""""""'- '°' ""' .. _,_
,~.-...--U<.HOM:e,tc ~"" -""""'- .,,..._,_
""°"°" ll> L--0,0, >:10 _ _ _ ..,_,.N:.......,..,..._,., ....,. - ,,_,,...,. ..,..,,.,,_ Wl'lb< , .. ,..,O<."UI
MAIN STREET ELECilUCAl. D,[P'ROVEMENTS PROJECT
DITAD . SHEET
[!l M NL r=,• ... ..., (....,___ J- ...n)""' - O,Uff.t#' 1 □~•:,. ~~ :-~ . J-. ,.,. = (,_CD<) - ......
@;~~Jl)- --.J.,~•,~ ~.:,.::;i-
lEI ~7;,.~~:'[f•l_,~r.h-i--='1~~~1~ ;-=,
l!!l ~"~,l ... ~~.'".:.!c"'t..: :;:~ ,i;,,..- ,.._.,
E3 =~~~+~~ -t;~'f,'.:~
@I
· · - ---)lt!IIOPI: ~
_ .,, ....._..-..nil _ [ .. ,,....,,._ _
~ •-••-.n,ou'"" "­
••- .,._,_,o_ ---+I ... ,...,._. .. i.i-- ~··-- · -
~ ei -,- ~
~ r~- 11) _ , , . .. """""" -•~
,_,..,, .. _.. ""'_""'°"""
,_,..,, r........- m: -""'°'-',£
MAIN STREET Fl..E.cnt.ICAl. D[P'RO\IE.'-tliNTS PROJECT
STREET I.JG Hlil,G PL\.."'S
un, 3 <F 3
3 Underground Service Alert
MAIN STREET ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, PROJ No. CP GGCF MSLI 001-2021 Know what'sbelow.

Callbefore you dig.

MAIN STREET ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

CONTACTUTILITY PHONE NO.

UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION

LOCATION MAP

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

PROJECT SITE
GENERAL NOTES:

SHEET TITLESHEET NO. STREET NAME

SHEET INDEX
City Of Garden Grove
LIGHTING GENERAL NOTES:
1 TITLE SHEET

EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
DETAIL "A"

TREE LIGHTING JUNCTION BOX

NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL "C"

GFCI OUTLET MOUNTED ON

EXISTING STREET LIGHT FOUNDATION IN PARKING LOT

NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL "B"

GFCI OUTLET & TREE LIGHTING JUNCTION BOX

NOT TO SCALE
3 MAIN STREET ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
2 DETAIL SHEET
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

DETAIL "D"

EXISTING SERVICE CABINET

NOT TO SCALE

EXISTING SERVICE CABINET

EAST SIDE OF EXISTING SERVICE CABINET

WEST SIDE OF EXISTING SERVICE CABINET
LEGEND

EXISTING TREE

IN TREE WELL

PROPOSED LED ROPE LIGHTING

TO TOP OF TREE TRUNK EXISTING TREE

IN TREE WELL

REPLACE SOIL IN-KIND AS
NEEDED. SOIL SHAU. BE LEI/EL
WITH SIDEWALK. PROTECT
EXISTING TREE ROOTS.

PROPOSED BELL WEATHERPROOF

ELECTRICAL BOX LOCATED AS

CLOSE TO THE EXISTING TREE AS

POSSIBLE ON THE STREET SIDE

REPLACE SOIL IN-KIND AS
NEEDED. SOIL SHAU. BE LEI/EL
WITH SIDEWALK. PROTECT
EXISTING TREE ROOTS.
r FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT

CONDUIT, WRAPPED AROUND
BASE OF TREE FOR 2-FEET

EXISTING STAMPED

CONCRETE EXISTING SIDEWALK

EXISTING STAMPED

CONCRETE
SYMBOL
D
D
-
©
a
~
0 ----
---
----
PROPOSED r GALVANIZED

RIGID STEEL CONDUIT

QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
1 NO. 6 Fl BERL YTE PULL BOX, OLD CASTILE OR AGENCY
APPROVED EQUAL.
6 NO. 5 Fl BERL YTE PULL BOX, OLD CASTILE OR AGENCY
APPROVED EQUAL.
1 NO. 5- T STEEL COVER PULL BOX WITIH BOLT DOWN LID,
BROOKS PRODUCTS OR APPROVED EQUAL.
33 LED WARM WHITE ROPE LIGHT.
27 BELL WEA TlHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL BOX WITIH
WEA TlHERPROOF COVER.

L-COM 120 VAC WEATIHERPROOF ENCLOSURE WITIH
8 MOUNTING PLATE AND STANDARD SURGE PROTECTED,
DUPLEX 120 VAC OUTILET.

BELL WEA TlHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL BOX WITIH DUPLEX
2 RECEPTACLE GFCI OUTILET AND WEATIHERPROOF
PADLOCKABLE COVER BY INTERMATIC #WP3110MXD.
f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT. ENDS OF CONDUITS

TERMINATING IN PULL BOXES SHAUL BE SUPPLIED WITIH
1050' SWEEPS AND BUSHINGS. CIRCUIT TYPE COLORS: TIREE
LIGHT-RED, GFCI OUTILET-BLACK. NUMBER OF
CONDUCTORS AS INDICATED.
750' NEW 2• PVC SCHEDULE BO CONDUIT.
100' NEW 3• PVC SCHEDULE 80 CONDUIT.
70' NEW ~• FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONDUIT.

LIGHTING EQUIPMENT NOTES:

1. INSTALL EQUIPMENT PER MANUFACTURERS INSTIRUCTIONS.

PROPOSED r GALVANIZED

RIGID STEEL CONDUIT

MANUFACTURER/CATALOG NUMBER

LUMINAIRE/LAMP
OUD CASTILE / FIBREL YTE FIL36
OUD CASTILE / FIBREL YTE FIL30
BROOKS PRODUCTS / NO. 5-T PB
AMERICAN LIGHTING / f CLEAR TUBING WITIH WARM
WHITE LEDS 120 VOLT, 150 FT
GRAINGER / WEATIHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL BOX NO# 5330-0
GRAINGER / WEATIHERPROOF COVER NO# 5173-0
L-COM NEMA TYPE 4, 4X/ IP66 RATED NO#
NB121005-100
GRAINGER/ WEATIHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL BOX NO# 5330-0
INTERMATIC / WEATIHERPROOF COVER #WP3110MXD

2. CONTIRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LAMPS, ACCESSORIES AND MOUNTING HARDWARE AS REQUIRED.

3. CONTIRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE BY MANUFACTURER SPECIFIED OR APPROVED EQUAL SUBSTITUTED FIXTURES WILL REQUIRE PHOTOMETIRIC CALCULATIONS AND MUST PERFORM EQUAL TO OR BETTER TlHAN LIGHT FIXTURE SPECIFIED. ENGINEER TO MAKE FINAL DETERMINATION.

4. PHOTO ELECTRIC CELL BY OTIHERS

INSTALL TREE

LIGHT /GFCI WIRES

IN EXISTING

CONDUIT

PROPOSED LED ROPE LIGHTING

TO TOP OF TREE TRUNK
PROPOSED L-COM 120 VAC

WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE

LOCATED AS CLOSE TO THE

EXISTING TREE AS POSSIBLE ON

THE STREET SIDE
r FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT

CONDUIT, WRAPPED AROUND
BASE OF TREE FOR 2-FEET

EXISTING SIDEWALK

PROPOSED BELL WEATIHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL

BOX WITIH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE GFCI OUTILET

AND WEATIHERPROOF PADLOCKABLE COVER

ATTACHED TO SIDE OF EXISTING STIREET LIGHT
POLE FOUNDATION WITIH SCREWS.

PROPOSED NO. 5-T PULLBOX W/

STEEL COVER (TIRAFFIC RATED)
PROPOSED 2" PVC
SCHEDULE 80 CONDUIT
• 0 .,,

INSTALL TIREE LIGHT/GFCI WIRES

IN EXISTING CONDUIT
JUNCTION BOX ON EAST EX. CONDUIT TO:\
REMOVE EX.­

PHOTOCEUL FOR

PARKING LOT &

ALLEY LIGHTING
EX. JUNCTION
BOX. REMOVE

ABANDONED
WIRES
RES EX. CONDUIT/WI

FOR PARKING LO

ALLEY LIGHTING
T &

INSTALL PULLBOX IN

SIDE OF CABINET
' I 0 ~
'n'
~
- : - - g.. If EXISTING CONDUIT RUN
'\~ ---EX. CONDUIT FOR PARKING

LOT & ALLEY LIGHTING
I
J
J
~ J
EX. STREET LIGHT POLE

FOUNDATION
p

PROPOSED STRAP
PROSPOED i" GALVANIZED

RIGID STEEL CONDUIT

REMOVE EXISTING

STEEL CAGE

INSTALL

HOTOELECTRIC CELL
& WIRING FOR TIREE r:;:;~;:;J;:;:;:~~ LIGHTING ,,---_-_ 77

PROTECT IN
PLACE EX.

JUNCTION BOX
I
I
' ' I
I
' ' ~~,-,r--, I
I
I I
L __ .J
r--,
I
I I
L __ .J

PROTECT IN PLACE
EX. PHOTOCELL FOR
MAIN ST. LIGHTING

REMOVE EXISTING

GFCI OU TILET &

PATCH HOLES TO

SMOOTIH FINISH

REMOVE EXISTING

GFCI OU TILET &

PATCH HOLES TO

SMOOTIH FINISH
PROPOSED 2" ----.:,. \ PROPOSED 3" CONDUIT

CONDUIT
CJ
D
D
-
o--0
m
o----0
EXISTING SERVICE CABINET.

EXISTING STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX TO REMAIN.

PROPOSED NO. 6 STREET LIGHT PULL BOX. SEE LIGHTING
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED NO. 5 STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX. SEE LIGHTING
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED NO. 5-T STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX (TRAFFIC
GRADE). SEE LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

EXISTING STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX TO BE REMOVED.

EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN.

EXISTING HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTING (HSL) ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL STANDARD.
0 ■
-----
PROPOSED L-COM 120 VAC WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE WITH

MOUNTING PLATE AND STANDARD SURGE PROTECTED, DUPLEX
120 VAC OUTLET.

PROPOSED BEUL WEATIHERPROOF ELECTRICAL BOX WITIH DUPLEX

RECEPTACLE GFCI OUTILET AND WEATIHERPROOF PADLOCKABLE
COVER.

EXISTING TREE WITH PROPOSED LED ROPE LIGHTING.

PROPOSED BELL WEATIHERPROOF ELECTRICAL BOX.

EXISTING 1.5" CONDUIT TO REMAIN.

EXISTING 2" CONDUIT TO REMAIN.

PROPOSED ~• GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT. SEE
EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED 2" CONDUIT. SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED 3" CONDUIT. SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

NUMBER OF EXISTING TREES.
r.7 PROTECT EXISTING SERVICE CABINET WITIH 1-120/240V SERVICE METER AND L...:..J 1-200 AMP-1P MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER. SEE SHEET 3 FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED CIRCUIT BREAKERS. SEE DETAIL "D" ON SHEET 2 FOR MODIFICATIONS TO SERVICE CABINET.
[I] NOT IN USE.
[TI INSTALL NO. 5 PULL BOX.
0 INSTALL NO. 5-T PULL BOX.
0 INSTALL NO. 6 PUUL BOX.
r;;-] INSTALL f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT WITIH 2#12 (1-RED, 1-WHITE) FOR ~ TREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.
0 INSTALL f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT AS SUPPORTING ROD. 1D7 INSTALL 3" CONDUIT WITIH 16#8 (8-BLACK, 8-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTILETS, 16#8 ~ (8-RED, 8-WHITE) FOR TREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.
inl INSTALL 150' LENGTIH, i" LED WARM WHITE ROPE LIGHT WRAPPED AROUND L.:'....J EXISTING TREE. TREE WRAPPING SHALL BE EVERY 0.5-FEET. ANY EXCESS ROPE LIGHT SHALL BE CUT OFF AND SEALED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS .

SEE DETAIL "A" AND "B" ON SHEET 2.
r:jci7 INSTALL BELL #5330-0 WEATIHERPROOF ELECTRICAL BOX. CONTIRACTOR SHALL l...'..::'...I HARDWIRE TIREE LIGHTING IN BOX. BOX SHAUL BE LOCATED CLOSEST TO EXISTING TREES AS POSSIBLE ON TlHE STREET SIDE. SEE DETAIL "A" ON SHEET

2. r,;-:;i INSTALL L-COM #NB121005-100 120 VAC WEATIHERPROOF ENCLOSURE WITIH l...'...'.J MOUNTING PLATE AND STANDARD SURGE PROTECTED, DUPLEX 120 VAC OUTILET.

CONTRACTOR SHALL HARDWIRE TREE LIGHTING IN BOX. BOX SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSEST TO EXISTING TREES AS POSSIBLE ON TlHE STREET SIDE. SEE DETAIL "B" ON SHEET 2.
r,;;i INSTALL BEUL #5330-0 WEATIHERPROOF ELECTRICAL BOX WITIH DUPLEX l...'.=-l RECEPTACLE GFCI OUTILET AND INTERMATIC WIEATIHERPROOF PADLOCKABLE COVER #WP3110MXD. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BOX TO EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLE WITIH SCREWS. SEE DETAIL •c• ON SHEET 2.
r.-;, INSTALL PHOTOELECTRIC CELL AND 4-POLE CONTACTOR FOR TREE LIGHT l...'..::'...I CIRCUITS.
r.;"] INSTALL 2" CONDUIT WITIH 4#8 (2-BLACK, 2-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTILETS, 1#12 ~ GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PUUL ROPE BY JACKING & BORING .. r:;-;;-J INSTALL 3" CONDUIT WITIH 8#8 (4-BLACK, 4-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTILETS, 8#8 l...'..::'...I (4-RED, 4-WHITE) FOR TREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE BY JACKING & BORING.
r;"s7 INSTALL 2" CONDUIT WITIH 4#8 (2-BLACK, 2-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTILETS, l...'..::'...I 4#8 (2-RED, 2-WHITE) FOR TREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PUUL ROPE.
@] INSTALL f GALVANZIED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT WITIH 2#12 (1-BLACK, 1-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTILETS, 2#12 (1-RED, 1-WHITE) FOR TREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.
r:;-;;-J INSTALL f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT WITIH 2#12 (1-BLACK, 1-WHITE) l...'..::'...I FOR GFCI OUTILETS, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.

INSTALL 2" CONDUIT WITIH 4#8 (2-BLACK, 2-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTILETS, 4#8 (2-RED, 2-WHITE) FOR TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PUUL ROPE BY JACKING & BORING.

REMOVE EXISTING 6" CONCRETE RIBBON AND SAWCUT 6" OF EXISTING STAMPED CONCRETE FOR 12" WIDE TRENCH. CONSTRUCT 6" TlHICK, 1' WIDTIH PCC PAVEMENT (3250 PSI) OVER 6" C.A.B. OVER EXISTING SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION. CONCRETE SHAUL HAVE LIGHT BROOM FINISH. REINFORCE WITIH #4 REBAR AT 24" O.C., 12" LENGTIH (TO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT) AND #4 REBAR RUNNING ENTIRE LENGTIH OF TlHE CONCRETE.

IBcl INSTALL PULL BOX IN EXISTING CONDUIT RUN.

I pp I PROTECT EXISTING IN PLACE.

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET OF
ALLEY
3 MAIN STREET ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
3 STREET LIGHTING PLANS
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

PARKWAYACACIA
PECOR
PLAZA

PARKING
LOT
LEGEND

(E)
(E)
(E)
z w
0 0::::
<(
C)

CIRCUIT
1 3
5 7
9 11
13 15
17 19
21 23
25 27
29 R/W
MAIN
CIRCUIT 6
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE pp

OVERHEAD SIGN
R/W
R/W

CITY OF
GARDEN GROVE pp

I OVERHEAD SIGN
~R/W
20 17
7 9 11
7 9 11
CIRCUIT 2

OJ SERVICE

TYPE CONDUCTORS CIRCUIT BREAKER
TIREE LIGHTS 2#12 20A-120-1P (1-3, 34) 1-RED, 1-WHITE
TIREE LIGHTS 2#12 20A-120-1P (9-13) 1-RED, 1-WHITE
TIREE LIGHTS 2#12 20A-120-1P (21-25) 1-RED, 1-WHITE
TIREE LIGHTS 2#12 20A-120-1P (30-33) 1-RED, 1-WHITE
GFCI OUTLET 2#12 20A-120-1P 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
GFCI OUTLET 2#12 20A-120-1P 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
GFCI OUTLET 2#12 20A-120-1P 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
GFCI OUTLET 2#12 20A-120-1P 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
LIGHTING 2#6 RED/BLACK -
LIGHTING 2#6 RED/BLACK -
IRRIGATION 2#6 RED/BLACK -
GFCI OUTLET 2#12 20A-120-1P 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE

NOT USED - -

NOT USED - -

NOT USED - -
(E) EXISTING
10 LOAD
300W
500W
500W
400W
1500W
1500W
1500W
1500W
-
-
-
1500W
-
-
-
20 17 9 10 20 17 9 10 7 9 11
17 20 9 10 17 20 9 10
R/WL .... ~ -+~.....,._/ _ ,+-1 - "" --__ '_''', I "" ' 1-7 1 ± ' ' -- '

EQUIPMENT
3-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS
5-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS
5-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS
4-1 DOW TIREE LIGHTS
1-0UTLET
1-0UTLET
1-0UTLET
1-0UTLET
EX. LED LUMINAIRES
EX. LED LUMINAIRES
EX. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
1-0UTLET
-
-
-
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
(E)
•
- -

CIRCUIT TYPE
2 LIGHTING
(19-28)
4 LIGHTING
(29-37)
6 LIGHTING
(1-10)
8 LIGHTING
(11-18)
10 LIGHTING
12 GFCI OUTLET
14 GFCI OUTLET
16 TIREE LIGHTS
(4-8)
18 TIREE LIGHTS
(14-17)
20 TIREE LIGHTS
(18-20, 35)
22 TIREE LIGHTS
(26-29)
24 GFCI OUTLET
26 GFCI OUTLET
28 GFCI OUTLET
30 NOT USED
(E) EXISTING
•
7 9 10 20 6 9 10 20 6
---8 '
©- - ©
pp
CIRCUIT 1, 12, 13, 16
CIRCUIT 6
9 10 20 6 9 10 3
' -0 pp
CIRCUIT 16
©:
0--l I
20 6 9 10
PP
CIRCUIT =--=:;:::~
CIRCUIT 5
1,3, 12, 14, 13, 15, 16,18
pp
-w - @2-w
7 9 10 6 20 9 10 6 20 9 10
CIRCUIT 2
13 1
SEE DETAIL "D" ON SHEET 2 FOR 5

CONNECTION TO EXISTING SERVICE CABINET BC
R/W ,
•
'"
' '
0 Ii ~CIRCUIT 17
- -
10 9

CIRCUIT
'\! 1,3,5,7,9,11,12,13,14,
\, 8 15,16,18,20,22,24,26
\,< ORC>JITS 23,28
\
\ 14
\
CIRCUIT 17, 19,21
CIRCUIT 8
6 9 10 20 6 9 10 20 6
'
®
pp pp
CIRCUIT 7,11,22,26
-®- • --®·
w
7 9 10 20 16
@
pp
CIRCUIT 3,14
CIRCUIT 11,22
pp
@-• 29 •
6 20 6
~~
9 10 7 9 10 16 20
! CIRCUIT 23
•
R/W
- -
EXISTING SERVICE CABINET.
pp
STREET
9 10 20 17 9 10 20 17 9 10 20 17 7 9 11
"~ ~11
pp
CIRCUIT 15,18
CIRCUIT 7,26
9 10 17 20
R/W ) •
CIRCUIT 8 o o
e\---/ ~
iL
' lL' ' -- ---+- 00
... ~ ~ ••
pp
I 11 • ______ CIRCUIT 15"",1-'-'8,_ ___ _ 11 ' '
CIRCUIT 7,26 ••
pp pp
• - @), w -
,·· ---+
••
9 10 17 20 9 10 17 20 7 9 11
•
CIRCUIT 4
r.7 PROTECT EXISTING SERVICE CABINET WlllH 1-120/240V SERVICE METER AND L...'...J 1-200 AMP-1P MAIN CIRCUIT BREAKER. SEE SHEET 3 FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED CIRCUIT BREAKERS. SEE DETAIL "D" ON SHEET 2 FOR MODIFICATIONS TO SERVICE CABINET.
0 NOT IN USE.
0 INSTALL NO. 5 PULL BOX.
(I] INSTALL NO. 5-T PULL BOX.
[}] INSTALL NO. 6 PULL BOX.
f;"l INSTALL f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT WlllH 2#12 (1-RED, 1-WHITE) FOR L'.'.J TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE. 0 INSTALL f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT AS SUPPORTING ROD. !al INSTALL 3" CONDUIT WlllH 16(18 (8-BLACK, 8-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 16(18 ~ (8-RED, 8-WHITE) FOR TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE .
1n7 INSTALL 150' LENGllH, i" LED WARM WHITE ROPE LIGHT WRAPPED AROUND ~ EXISTING TIREE. TIREE WRAPPING SHALL BE EVERY 0.5-FEET. ANY EXCESS ROPE LIGHT SHALL BE CUT OFF AND SEALED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

SEE DETAIL "A" AND "B" ON SHEET 2.

INSTALL BELL #5330-0 WEAllHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL BOX. CONTIRACTOR SHALL HARDWIRE TIREE LIGHTING IN BOX. BOX SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSEST TO EXISTING TIREES AS POSSIBLE ON llHE STIREET SIDE. SEE DETAIL "A" ON SHEET

2. INSTALL L-COM #NB121005-100 120 VAC WEAllHERPROOF ENCLOSURE WlllH MOUNTING PLATE AND STANDARD SURGE PROTECTED, DUPLEX 120 VAC OUTLET.

CONTIRACTOR SHALL HARDWIRE TIREE LIGHTING IN BOX. BOX SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSEST TO EXISTING TIREES AS POSSIBLE ON llHE STIREET SIDE. SEE DETAIL "B" ON SHEET 2.
r:;;;i INSTALL BELL #5330-0 WEAllHERPROOF ELECTIRICAL BOX WlllH DUPLEX l...'.=-l RECEPTACLE GFCI OUTLET AND INTERMATIC WEAllHERPROOF PADLOCKABLE COVER #WP3110MXD. CONTIRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BOX TO EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLE WlllH SCREWS. SEE DETAIL "C" ON SHEET 2.
r:;-;, INSTALL PHOTOELECTIRIC CELL AND 4-POLE CONTACTOR FOR TIREE LIGHT l...'..:'...I CIRCUITS.

OJ SERVICE
D EXISTING STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX TO REMAIN.

CONDUCTORS CIRCUIT BREAKER LOAD EQUIPMENT
2#6 RED/BLACK 20A-120-1P 540W 10-54W LED LUMINAIRES
2#6 RED/BLACK 20A-120-1P 486W 9-54W LED LUMINAIRES
2#6 RED/BLACK 20A-120-1P 540W 10-54W LED LUMINAIRES
2#6 RED/BLACK 20A-120-1P 432W 8-54W LED LUMINAIRES
2#6 RED/BLACK 20A-120-1P - PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL
2#12 20A-120-1P 1500W 1-0UTLET 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
2#12 20A-120-1P 1500W 1-0UTLET 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
2#12 20A-120-1P 500W 5-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS 1-RED, 1-WHITE 2#12 20A-120-1P 400W 4-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS 1-RED, 1-WHITE 2#12 20A-120-1P 300W 3-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS 1-RED, 1-WHITE 2#12 20A-120-1P 400W 4-1 OOW TIREE LIGHTS 1-RED, 1-WHITE 2#12 20A-120-1P 1500W 1-0UTLET 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
2#12 20A-120-1P 1500W 1-0UTLET 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
2#12 20A-120-1P 1500W 1-0UTLET 1-BLACK, 1-WHITE
- - - -
D
D
-
o---0
w
o----l8)
q:p
0 ■
-----
@
PROPOSED NO. 6 STREET LIGHT PULL BOX. SEE LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED NO. 5 STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX. SEE LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED NO. 5-T STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX (TRAFFIC GRADE). SEE LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

EXISTING STREET LIGHTING PULL BOX TO BE REMOVED.

EXISTING STREET LIGHT TO REMAIN.

EXISTING HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTING (HSL) ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL STANDARD.

PROPOSED L-COM 120 VAC WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE WITH MOUNTING PLATE AND STANDARD SURGE PROTECTED, DUPLEX 120 VAC OUTLET.

PROPOSED BELL WEAllHERPROOF ELECTRICAL BOX WlllH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE GFCI OUTLET AND WEAllHERPROOF PADLOCKABLE COVER.

EXISTING TIREE WITH PROPOSED LED ROPE LIGHTING.

PROPOSED BELL WEATHERPROOF ELECTRICAL BOX.

EXISTING 1.5" CONDUIT TO REMAIN.

EXISTING 2" CONDUIT TO REMAIN. 20' 10' 0 10' 20'
PROPOSED f' GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT. SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED 2• CONDUIT. SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

PROPOSED 3" CONDUIT. SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.

NUMBER OF EXISTING TREES.
- -- --GRAPIIIC BCALB
r.:;i INSTALL 2• CONDUIT WlllH 4(18 (2-BLACK, 2-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 1#12 l..'.2..1 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE BY JACKING & BORING .. r:;;;i INSTALL 3" CONDUIT WlllH 8(18 (4-BLACK, 4-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 81/8 l...'..:'...I (4-RED, 4-WHITE) FOR TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL @]
ROPE BY JACKING & BORING.

INSTALL 2" CONDUIT WlllH 4(18 (2-BLACK, 2-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 4#8 (2-RED, 2-WHITE) FOR TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.

INSTALL ~• GALVANZIED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT WlllH 2#12 (1-BLACK, 1-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 2#12 (1-RED, 1-WHITE) FOR TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.
r,;-;;i INSTALL f GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT WlllH 2#12 (1-BLACK, 1-WHITE) l...'.:'...i FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE.

INSTALL 2" CONDUIT WlllH 4#8 (2-BLACK, 2-WHITE) FOR GFCI OUTLETS, 4#8 (2-RED, 2-WHITE) FOR TIREE LIGHTING, 1#12 GROUND (1-GREEN) AND PULL ROPE BY JACKING & BORING.

REMOVE EXISTING 6" CONCRETE RIBBON AND SAWCUT 6" OF EXISTING STAMPED CONCRETE FOR 12" WIDE TIRENCH. CONSTIRUCT 6" llHICK, 1' WIDllH PCC PAVEMENT (3250 PSI) OVER 6" C.A.B. OVER EXISTING SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE LIGHT BROOM FINISH. REINFORCE WlllH #4 REBAR AT 24" O.C., 12" LENGllH (TO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT) AND #4 REBAR RUNNING ENTIRE LENGllH OF llHE CONCRETE.

IBcl INSTALL PULL BOX IN EXISTING CONDUIT RUN.

IPPI PROTECT EXISTING IN PLACE.

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET OF

GARDEN GROVE
BID DEADLINE: Tuesday, June 5, 2022 at 4:00 p.m.

City Clerk's Office
PROJECT NO.: Garden Grove Community Foundation
(GGCF) - 02-2022 Main Street Electrical
Project
B'l~ID!iRS (Name & .Address) Bf~ ADDENDUM 1 ADDENDUM 2 AMOUNT OF BID B€>NID
PTfv1 ~~, ~-svc.s.
/ / ✓ $ ze/1, oEff 5'f~2.. Ao,YV\ ~-r.

R.1ve..vr1de1 C.t°\ ~ 25Df-
~S~V\ f.1ec.trlW e
✓ ✓ ~ 4q1 4 6-:f £:>~,~-
✓ 5'+Slf D ,az. s-t--. I
""l:(WIV\ MC.., d't- a, I D?lo
~led- a~c Inc......
✓ ✓ ~ ;l...""790 0,1,1S.1nlS,6 f>lc... 0 Y.
✓ $g'-l-5, 33e, \t1=.~. Cf\ 4 208 l
ctt1:. Corts.-tYIA~
✓ ✓
,DI & Bd{i\ Ro{, ~/DI
✓ ~ 4~1, ,5"C/
~~I WI, 0\ ~ .2.~l6°
Agenda Item - 5.b.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Lisa L. Kim
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community and Economic
Development
Subject: Award a contract to Project
Finance Advisory, Limited for
the P3 Project Feasibility and
Project Management
consultant services for the
Garden Grove Civic Center
Project. (Cost:
$181,448.00) (Action Item)
Date: 7/12/2022

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to consider approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Project Finance Advisory, Limited (PFAL) for P3 Project Feasibility and Project Management consultant services for the Garden Grove Civic Center Project in the amount not to exceed $181,448.00.

BACKGROUND
The Garden Grove Police Facility was developed over the last 50 years with an original 33,481 square foot building that was based on the 1967 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Today, there are five (5) buildings that make-up the Garden Grove Police Facilities campus (Main Police Facility, Evidence and Property Annex, Off-Site Evidence Warehouse, Special Services Annex and the Juvenile Justice Center) and the collective program spaces total 53,206 square feet.

In January 2020, the City Council authorized a comprehensive space needs assessment of the police facilities by Dewberry to address current and future needs of the Garden Grove Police Department (GGPD). Findings of the Dewberry Report identified deficiencies in the existing GGPD facilities and insufficient spacing available for building, parking, and site needs to accommodate current and future demands of the public safety operations. It further concluded the current Police Facilities campus are all undersized and poorly configured.

DISCUSSION
In February 2022, a formal Request for Proposals (RFP) circulated under a

competitive solicitation for a P3 Project Feasibility and Project Management services for the Garden Grove Civic Center area including the Garden Grove Police Department (GGPD) public safety facilities. The RFP was published through the City’s Planet Bids portal on February 17, 2022. The RFP outlined the selection process would be evaluated in areas of past performance related to public safety facilities, firm qualifications, team member resumes, cost organization and budget, references, methodology and schedule, project management philosophy, and P3 team’s overall experience in P3 technical advisory services and project approach. Two addenda were issued to clarify RFP-related questions.

Selection Committee, Evaluation and Rating Summary
Five (5) proposals were received by the March 17, 2022 RFP deadline. Based on the evaluation criteria outlined in the RFP, a Selection Committee comprised of department representatives from the Community and Economic Development, Community Services, Finance, Police, and Public Works performed proposal evaluations, and conducted a formal interview process on April 7 and 11, 2022.

While multiple department representatives participated in the Selection Committee process, each department submitted one collective rating sheet. The Selection Committee Rating Summary ranked the proposers as follows:

1. Project Finance Advisory, Limited (PFAL)

2. ARUP

3. Ernst & Young Infrastructure Advisors, LLC

4. DLR Group

5. Brookhurst Development & Advisory Corporation

The top two ranked firms (ARUP and PFAL) were invited to submit a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) proposals by May 4, 2022. Following the BAFO review, the Selection Committee determined that PFAL was the most qualified team with the highest ranked proposal to provide feasibility analysis and project management services.

PFAL assembled a dynamic team comprised of HOK (industry leaders in public safety facilities design), Dharam Consulting (cost estimation and O&M analysis), and HR&A (fiscal impacts analysis for open space infrastructure) for the Garden Grove Civic Center Project. PFAL demonstrated a strong track record in project advisory and consulting services, especially proficiency in navigating several complex projects among multiple jurisdictions (County of Sonoma, City of Los Angeles, and San Joaquin County). The Selection Committee found that PFAL was able to clearly communicate the importance of community involvement, partnership and inclusiveness. Information about the RFP process and proposer responses are available on the City's website for Civic Center Community Engagement at https://ggcity.org/civic-center.

RFP Scope of Work
The RFP defined the Scope of Work in which the selected consultant would assist City staff in formulating a multi-phase procurement strategy comprised of the following deliverables:

Project Management support activities including development of a Project Schedule and Implementation;
Preparation and issuance of a detailed Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a P3

•
•
Project;
Preparation and issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a P3 Project; Administration and oversight of the review and selection process, among other related functions; and,
Developer negotiation support, and P3 contract management and owner’s representation during construction.

Understanding there is complexity in advancing P3 Project, staff is recommending Award of Contract for implementation of the Phase 1 Scope of Work only to PFAL.

This would allow refinement of overarching goals for service delivery and project development, analyzing and making recommendations regarding site locations for the future public safety facility, Civic Center Park enhancements and potential inclusion of affordable housing options. A breakdown of the Phase 1 Scope of Work to be performed by PFAL is summarized below:

1. Confirm Goals and Objectives . PFAL will review existing information, conduct meetings with staff and stakeholders to assess and validate goals and objectives for the public safety facilities, Civic Center Park and affordable housing options.

2. Conduct P3 Project Feasibility Analysis . PFAL will conduct a feasibility analysis along with funding and finance options to deliver a future public safety facility, additional amenities for Civic Center Park and affordable housing options.

3. Evaluate Site Alternative Analysis. PFAL will prepare an evaluation matrix to rank preferred site alternatives for the public safety facility including development of two (2) massing illustrations.

4. Develop Project Budget and Costing. PFAL shall develop an estimation for the project lifecycle and project delivery strategy.

At the conclusion of the Phase 1 process for the Garden Grove Civic Center area, the City Council will be presented options to exercise additional Scope of Work identified in the RFP. The Phase 2 scope of work would include preparation of a Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFQ/P) for a Qualified Developer, and assistance in evaluation proposal responses would typically constitute 3-4% of the total project cost for PFAL to continue project management services. Further project delivery would include construction management and other advisory services, as necessary.

Completion of Phase 1 will provide project detail information to the City Council about flexibility to advance the public safety facility project under a traditional path as a Public Works Capital Project or via P3 approach to include alternative project delivery and financing options or a combined hybrid approach.

Community Engagement Efforts
Concurrently with the P3 work, staff has initiated the Civic Center Community Engagement efforts to gather community input and feedback about opportunities in the civic center area for improved public amenities and also evaluate the need to replace and modernize the public safety facilities has begun. This information and the community survey are available on the City’s website at https://ggcity.org/civic- center.

A recap of Civic Center Community Engagement accomplished to date include:

•
•
•
Timeline Activity
October 12,
2021 Council
Meeting
Presented Civic Center Community
Engagement Overview
October 2021
Civic Center Community Engagement
website launched (https://ggcity.org/civic-
center)
May 10, 2022
Council Meeting
Civic Center Community Engagement
Update
June 1, 2022 Hosted in-person Civic Center Community
Engagement Open House
June 9, 2022 Hosted virtual Civic Center Community
Engagement Open House
July 2022 Release Civic Center Community
Engagement Survey

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds have been budgeted in the Biennial Budget for FY 2021-2022 and FY 2022- 2023 for the Civic Center/Public Safety Facilities Project.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Award a contract to Project Finance Advisory for the P3 Feasibility and Project Management consultant services for the Garden Grove Civic Center Project, in an amount not to exceed $181,448.00; and

Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, and make minor modifications thereto as needed.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Professional
Services Agreement
with PFAL
7/5/2022 Cover Memo PFAL_Feasibility_and_PM_Services_Agreement_(FINAL).pdf PFAL Proposal
(BAFO) 7/5/2022 Cover Memo PFAL_BAFO_Proposal_(FINAL).pdf

•
•
1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made this 12th day of July, 2022, by the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, a municipal corporation, ("CITY") and PROJECT FINANCE ADVISORY LIMITED, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CONTRACTOR”.

RECITALS

The following recitals are a substantive part of this Agreement:

1. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to City Council approval dated July 12, 2022.

2. CITY desires to utilize the services of CONTRACTOR to provide Project Feasibility and Project Management Consulting Services —Garden Grove Civic Center Project.

3. CONTRACTOR is qualified by virtue of experience, training, education and expertise to accomplish services.

AGREEMENT

THE PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Term and Termination The term of the agreement shall remain in effect until completion of the services to be provided by CONTRACTOR hereunder, unless earlier terminated by CITY. This agreement may be terminated by the CITY without cause per Section 3.4 below. In such event, the CITY will compensate CONTRACTOR for work performed to date in accordance with CONTRACTOR’s proposal which is attached as Attachment “A” and is hereby incorporated by reference. Contractor is required to present evidence to support performed work.

2. Services to be Provided. The services to be performed by CONTRACTOR shall consist of tasks as set forth in the Proposal. The Proposal is attached as Attachment A, and is incorporated herein by reference. The Proposal and this Agreement do not guarantee any specific amount of work.

3. Compensation. CONTRACTOR shall be compensated as follows:

3.1 Amount. Total Compensation under this agreement shall not exceed (NTE) amount of $181,448.00, payable in arrears and in accordance with proposal in Attachment “A”.

3.2 Payment. For work under this Agreement, payment shall be made per invoice for work completed. Within 45 day of delivery of goods or

2 completion of performance of services, CONTRACTOR must promptly render an invoice to CITY or payment may be significantly delayed. For extra work not a part of this Agreement, a written authorization by CITY will be required, and payment shall be based on schedule included in Proposal (Attachment A).

3.3 Records of Expenses. CONTRACTOR shall keep complete and accurate records of all costs and expenses incidental to services covered by this Agreement. These records will be made available at reasonable times to CITY.

3.4 Termination. CITY and CONTRACTOR shall have the right to terminate this agreement, without cause, by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination. If the Agreement is terminated by CITY, then the provisions of paragraph 3 would apply to that portion of the work completed.

4. Insurance requirements.

4.1 COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this Agreement until all certificates and endorsements have been received and approved by the CITY. All insurance required by this Agreement shall contain a Statement of Obligation on the part of the carrier or CONTRACTOR or its agent to notify the CITY of any material change, cancellation, or termination at least thirty (30) days in advance and provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City.

4.2 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE. During the duration of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors shall maintain Workers Compensation Insurance in the amount and type required by law, if applicable. The insurer shall waive its rights of subrogation against the CITY, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.

4.3 INSURANCE AMOUNTS. CONTRACTOR shall maintain the following insurance for the duration of this Agreement:

(a) Commercial general liability in an amount of $2,000,000.00 per occurrence (claims made and modified occurrence policies are not acceptable); Insurance companies must be acceptable to CITY and have a Best’s Guide Rating of A-, Class VII or better, as approved by the CITY.

(b) Automobile liability in an amount of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit (claims made and modified occurrence policies are not acceptable); Insurance companies must be acceptable to CITY and have a Best’s Guide Rating of A-, Class VII or better, as approved by the CITY.

3 (c) Professional liability in an amount not less than $2,000,000.

Insurance companies must be admitted and licensed In California and have a Best’s Guide Rating of A -Class VII or better, as approved by the City. If the policy is written on a “claims made” basis, the policy shall be continued in full force and effect at all times during the term of the agreement, and for a period of three (3) years from the date of the completion of services provided.

In the event of termination, cancellation, or material change in the policy, professional/consultant shall obtain continuing insurance coverage for the prior acts or omissions of
professional/consultant during the course of performing services under the term of the agreement. The coverage shall be evidenced either by a new policy evidencing no gap in coverage, or by obtaining separate extended “tail” coverage with the present or new carrier.

An On-Going and Completed Operations Additional Insured Endorsement for the policy under section 4.3 (a) shall designate CITY, it’s officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds for liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to CITY’s requirements, as approved by the CITY.

An Additional Insured Endorsement for the policy under section 4.3 (b) shall designate CITY, it’s officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds for automobiles, owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to CITY’s requirements, as approved by the CITY.

For any claims related to this Agreement, CONTRACTOR’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects CITY, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be excess of the CONTRACTOR’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

If CONTRACTOR maintains higher insurance limits than the minimums shown above, CONTRACTOR shall provide coverage for the higher insurance limits otherwise maintained by the CONTRACTOR.

5. Non-Liability of Officials and Employees of the CITY. No official or employee of CITY shall be personally liable to CONTRACTOR in the event of any default or breach by CITY, or for any amount which may become due to CONTRACTOR.

6. Non-Discrimination. CONTRACTOR covenants there shall be no discrimination against any person or group due to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital

4 status, age, handicap, national origin, or ancestry, in any activity pursuant to this Agreement.

7. Independent Contractor . It is agreed to that CONTRACTOR shall act and be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the CITY, and shall obtain no rights to any benefits which accrue to CITY's employees. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of CONTRACTOR shall at all times be under CONTRACTOR's exclusive direction and control. Neither CITY nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of CONTRACTOR or any of its officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. If for any reason, any court or governmental agency determines that CITY has financial obligations, other than pursuant to Section 3 above, of any nature related to salary, taxes, or benefits of CONTRACTOR's officers, employees, servants, representatives, subcontractors, or agents, CONTRACOR shall indemnify CITY for all such financial obligations.

8. Compliance with Law. CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, and regulations of the federal, state, and local government.

CONTRACTOR shall comply with, and shall be responsible for causing all contractors and subcontractors performing any of the work pursuant to this Agreement to comply with, all applicable federal and state labor standards, including, to the extent applicable, the prevailing wage requirements promulgated by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California Department of Labor. The City makes no warranty or representation concerning whether any of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement constitutes public works subject to the prevailing wage requirements.

9. Disclosure of Documents. All documents or other information developed or received by CONSULTANT are confidential and shall not be disclosed without authorization by CITY, unless disclosure is required by law.

10. Ownership of Work Product. All documents or other information developed or received by CONTRACTOR shall be the property of CITY. CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with copies of these items upon demand or upon termination of this Agreement.

11. Conflict of Interest. CONTRACTOR shall at all times avoid conflict of interest or appearance of conflict of interest in performance of this Agreement.

12. Notices. All notices shall be personally delivered or mailed to the below listed address, or to such other addresses as may be designated by written notice.

These addresses shall be used for delivery of service of process.

5 a. (Contractor)
Project Finance Advisory Limited
Attention: Victoria Taylor, President
751 E. Blithedale Ave., #2036
Mill Valley, CA 94942-2036

b. (Address of CITY) (with a copy to):

City of Garden Grove Garden Grove City Attorney
11222 Acacia Parkway 11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92840 Garden Grove, CA 92840

13. Contractor’s Proposal . This Agreement shall include CONTRACTOR'S proposal or bid which shall be incorporated herein by reference. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of the proposal and this Agreement, this Agreement shall govern.

14. Licenses, Permits, and Fees. At its sole expense, CONTRACTOR shall obtain a Garden Grove Business License, all permits, and licenses as may be required by this Agreement.

15. Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR warrants that: (1) it has investigated the work to be performed; (2) it has investigated the site of the work and is aware of all conditions there; and (3) it understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions of the work under this Agreement.

Should Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the work or as represented by CITY, it shall immediately inform CITY of this and shall not proceed, except at CONTRACTOR'S risk, until written instructions are received from CITY, if applicable.

16. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

17. Limitations Upon Subcontracting and Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of CONTRACTOR, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for CITY to enter into this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR shall not contract with any other entity to perform the services required without written approval of the CITY. This Agreement may not be assigned voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of CITY. If CONTRACTOR is permitted to subcontract any part of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to CITY for the acts and omissions of its subcontractor as it is for persons directly employed. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor and CITY. All persons engaged in the work will be considered employees of CONTRACTOR. CITY will deal directly with and will make all payments to CONTRACTOR.

18. Authority to Execute. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement and that by executing this Agreement, the parties are formally bound.

6 19. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall defend, and hold harmless CITY and its elective or appointive boards, officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims, liabilities, expenses, or damages of any nature, including attorneys' fees, for injury or death of any person, or damages of any nature, including interference with use of property, arising out of, or in any way connected with the negligence, recklessness and/or intentional wrongful conduct of CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR'S agents, officers, employees, subcontractors, or independent contractors hired by CONTRACTOR in the performance of the Agreement. The only exception to CONTRACTOR'S responsibility to protect, defend, and hold harmless CITY, is due to the negligence, recklessness and/or wrongful conduct of CITY, or any of its elective or appointive boards, officers, agents, or employees.

This hold harmless agreement shall apply to all liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONTRACTOR.

20. Modification. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any previous agreements, oral or written. This Agreement may be modified only by subsequent mutual written agreement executed by CITY and CONTRACTOR.

21. Appropriations. This Agreement is subject to and contingent upon funds being appropriated therefor by the Garden Grove City Council for each fiscal year covered by the term of this Agreement. If such appropriations are not made, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without penalty to the CITY.

22. Waiver. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing by the appropriate authorities of the CITY and CONTRACTOR.

23. California Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action commenced about this Agreement shall be filed in the central branch of the Orange County Superior Court.

24. Preservation of Agreement. Should any provision of this Agreement be found invalid or unenforceable, the decision shall affect only the provision interpreted, and all remaining provisions shall remain enforceable.

25. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted as though prepared by both parties.

\ \ \ \

(Agreement Signature Block on Next Page)

7 IN WITNESS THEREOF, these parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year shown below.

Date: _____________ "CITY"

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

By:___________________________
City Manager
ATTESTED:

____________________________
City Clerk

Date: _______________________
"CONTRACTOR"

PROJECT FINANCE ADVISORY

LIMITED

By: ___________________________

Name:__________________________

Title:___________________________

Date: __________________________

Tax ID No. ______________________

If CONTRACTOR is a corporation, a
Corporate Resolution and/or Corporate
Seal is required. If a partnership,
Statement of Partnership must be
submitted to CITY.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________
Garden Grove City Attorney

________________________
Date

8 ATTACHMENT “A”

PFAL PROPOSAL

May 04, 2022
Updated June 16, 2022

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
P3 PROJECT FEASIBILITY AND

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CONSULTING SERVICES

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER

PROJECT

BEST AND FINAL OFFER SUBMISSION UPDATE
Project Finance Advisory, Limited

Ll!=I~

PFAL

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 1

Project Finance Advisory Limited (“PFAL”) appreciates the opportunity to submit this Best and Final Offer (“BAFO”) in response to the City of Garden Grove’s (“the City”) letter dated April 20, 2022. We are delighted that we have been selected as a finalist for the P3 Feasibility and Project Management Consulting Services contract. Before responding to the City’s requests for clarification, we want to reiterate some of the strengths of our team and its capabilities.

• PFAL leads an all-star team that we assembled specifically to meet the needs of the City to successfully deliver the new Public Safety Facility. Our teams includes all the necessary disciplines and experience to successfully deliver the park revisioning and affordable housing. PFAL, HOK, HR&A, Dharam Consulting, and Altus Group are highly respected and are at the top of their respective fields, and we have worked together before to successfully deliver public-private partnerships (“P3s”). From directly relevant P3 advisory services and public safety facility design to enabling the development of placemaking outdoor spaces like the Highline in Manhattan, this team’s experience and capability is unparalleled. By selecting this team, the City will deliver the most cost-effective results and send a strong signal to the market that the City is receiving good advice from people and firms who are the best in the business. • PFAL’s project management philosophy matches the City’s needs and objectives: we facilitate your work by pro-actively leading project teams, coordinating with the City’s team and managing the right experts to give the City the best information to make decisions while maintaining schedule and budget discipline. PFAL’s leadership is invested in your success and our record of accomplishment demonstrates that we can successfully deliver your project. • We aim to help the City control costs while achieving your redesign objectives. This will be accomplished through careful attention to defining the project scope to avoid scope creep later, relying on expert input (including a current and comprehensive cost database) to develop realistic cost estimates for the construction, operations, and maintenance of the new City facilities, identifying revenue and cost savings opportunities, and in later phases challenging developer costs to ensure best value to the City. We are a creative and dynamic team of professionals who are committed to supporting the City’s project team in meeting your goals and objectives. • An agnostic and unbiased approach to analyzing delivery methods with experience across the universe of available alternatives. Collectively our team has delivered projects using the full range of delivery methods and we have deep knowledge of the costs and benefits of each approach. With an awareness of the political and decision-making context, we strive to identify the right fit for each client and their specific project or capital investment and real estate asset development program. • HOK’s experience with Public Safety Facilities is unmatched and includes successfully navigating government approval processes in challenging environments. Both HOK and HR&A bring creative experience and deep knowledge in implementing housing and open space planning strategies. • We are ready to execute the City’s form of contract included in the RFP (Request for Proposal) and begin work immediately.

l!.FALl
Project Finance
Ad,·isor)' Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 2

PHASE 1 – P3 PROJECT FEASIBILITY

1. UPDATE WORKPLAN. PROJECT SCOPE ANTICIPATES THE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF UP TO THREE (3) ALTERNATIVES SITES TO ACCOMMODATE A NEW PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY INCLUDING THE EXISTING SITE IDENTIFIED IN THE 2020 DEWBERRY REPORT.

Here we have provided additional detail on our previously submitted workplan to incorporate the City’s guidance on the various opportunity sites. We have incorporated the City’s most pressing concerns that were expressed during the interview and BAFO process. The PFAL team will conduct its work with the goal of satisfying the City’s objectives as stated in the RFP, to control costs and deliver the new Public Safety Facility and ancillary projects on time and on budget.

In Phase 1, we will consolidate all the relevant information that, in turn, will be analyzed with a view to recommending an optimal procurement and project delivery strategy.

First: upon being engaged, and in collaboration with the City, PFAL will establish our project management protocols. We will schedule a standing, weekly project management call with the City’s project team, schedule internal advisory team calls, set up a data room/file sharing system for the City project team and advisory team, develop an Active Issues list template which will serve as a living document to track and resolve the strategic and tactical actions needed to progress the Public Safety Facility, revisioned Civic Center Park, and housing project/s, and refresh the project schedule as
needed. These living documents will be managed by PFAL
and maintained in the data room where they will be readily available for review by all team members.

We will also perform our work with a view to developing defensible reco mmendations: our deliverables will help the City determine the path forward and be integrated into the City’s decision-making process. Reports and analysis will be written so that any recommendations and decisions made can be justified to internal stakeholders as well as the public.

Second: the advisory team will buil d on the City’s existing information, which is expected to include but is not limited to a review of the following material as well as a briefing from the City project team on the key issues and findings of these past efforts as described below:
• Dewberry 2020 r eport
• Active Downtown Plan
• Parks, Recreation & Facilities Master Plan
and three (3) conceptual plans
• Active Streets Master Plan
• Measure O data
• Downtown Parking Management Plan
• Re:Imagine Garden Grove
• Housing unit report

PFAL will take a pro-active
approach to driving the
project schedule forward,
keeping the team focused
on meeting deadlines, and
maintaining the budget.

Project Fiitnnco
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 3

At our “Goals and Objectives” meeting described below, PFAL will request that the City brief us on the key information that we should take away from the above reports, and we will focus on the content deemed by the City to be most critical to the completion of our work. In reviewing these documents and in discussions with the City, the team will consider the following:

1. Is the information and analysis current or is additional information needed, are the programming needs for the Public Safety facility post-COVID defined? Importantly, we will want to identify that the Dewberry conclusions are still intact and supported by decision makers so that new programming requirements are not introduced into the Public Safety Facility later as we conduct our work. This validation process is a crucial element of cost control and will include a review of all capital cost estimates in the original Dewberry report to ensure that capital costs are current and reflect prevalent market conditions.

2. Are the past assessments comprehensive?

3. What are the opportunities that have not been identified to help project feasibility? At the conclusion of the review period, PFAL will lead an internal call with the consulting team to consolidate the salient points from the past studies and consolidate the list of areas where additional information may be necessary.

Third: PF AL will hold a “Confirm Goals and Objectives” meeting with the City project team to confirm our team’s key findings and to listen to staff’s perspectives on the project definition, goals and objectives, and any information that might be known to staff that was not incorporated in past studies. We will use this meeting to discuss any concerns around different delivery methods (such as design-build or DBFOM) to understand if and why any options should be ruled out from consideration. We will also be prepared to share images from recent public safety facilities to solicit the City’s reactions to certain concepts.

Fourth: PFAL has assigned specific deliverables to each of our partners and will coordinate to ensure the City is getting the most creative, cost-effective, and experience-based solutions that achieve the City’s goals. • PFAL will confirm the City’s space needs a nd perform a review of available funding and financing options for the Public Safety Facility, re-visioned park, and parking facilities. • HOK will perform site fit massing for 2 site options identified by the City, including an assessment of the opportunities to expand/revision Civic Center Park. • Dharam will provide high-level cost estimates for construction and operations & maintenance based on the 2 massing studies.
• PFAL will then align available funding to the potential costs in a financial model that will incorporate the full lifecycle cost estimates for the Public Safety Facility, revisioned park, and parking facilities. • PFAL will develop a site evaluation matrix to score and rank the 2 different sites based on criteria to be agreed with the City (such as cost, transit access, programming, etc.).

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 4

• HR&A will provide high-level input on the operations & maintenance cost and governance structures for the re-visioned park with a view to including the Civic Center Park in the Public Safety Facility development, including:
o Evaluate potential operating costs for a high-quality urban park based on a high-level benchmarking exercise
o As part of the overall delivery model recommendations, provide input on the optimal governance structure to leverage funding sources, and maintain park amenities to good standards. Options may include City led operations, creation of a new non-profit entity, or partner with the P3 developer, among others.
• PFAL will also conduct a qualitative analysis to develop a recommendation on procurement strategies.
• PFAL will be available throughout the project delivery process to work with City staff, elected officials, Placeworks, and other stakeholders in a supporting role for any other necessary meetings to ensure a comprehensive public involvement and stakeholder engagement process will support a successful procurement.

We understand that past operations and maintenance costs will not be assessed as part of our work and that the City is looking to our team to define a market standard cost framework for the projects’ full lifecycle.

Fifth: we w
ill help facilitate a site visit to one of HOK’s recent public safety facility projects for City staff to provide up-to-date examples of contemporary design and operational approaches. This will likely take the form of an un-hosted (City-led) visit to the Manhattan Beach Police & Fire and/or the Orange County Fire Operations and Training Center.

Simultaneously with the work described above, we will coordinate with the City and Placeworks on the ongoing public engagement strategy. We anticipate monthly calls, preparation of presentation materials, and presentation at two public meetings. This will be important given the anticipated transition in Police Department leadership, community sentiment on the duck pond, neighborhood business interests in parking, and impacts of new housing on neighborhood parking.

Sixth: The outcome of this work will be a business case re port, which will explain:
• WHY the new facilities are needed
• WHAT the project is (defining the project/s the City is seeking to deliver) • WHEN the project/s can be delivered based on a specific delivery strategy • WHERE the project/s should be located
• HOW the project/s can be delivered, which will address affordability and a recommended procurement approach

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 5

If desirable by the City, to accelerate the City’s review of the full suite of analysis and recommendations, and to encourage socialization and acceptance of the key elements of the report with City stakeholders on an expedited basis, the PFAL team can deliver drafts of the separate components of the report as they are available. We anticipate that the final Business Case report will be organized as follows:
• Project rationale
• Goals and objectives
• Project definition
• Sites and costs
• Funding and financing
• Schedule
• Recommended delivery option
Separately, HR&A will also review and evaluate the opportunity for housing development at 11391 Acacia Parkway, including market, financial and delivery implications, and related tradeoffs. • HR&A will work with the City and PFAL team to develop two development scenarios for the site, which may include a combination of market rate, mixed income (inclusionary), and 100% affordable components. The scenarios will consider the City’s policy goals, available resources, market considerations and regulatory constraints such as the Surplus Land Act.

• HR&A will conduct a high-level market scan to benchmark prevailing rents, product types and potential absorption estimates.
• HR&A will then derive land value for the development scenario based on comparable transactions and map out the potential funding sources and uses to identify funding gap/surplus (if any). HR&A will also provide considerations regarding potential for bundling/unbundling of the housing component into the P3 transaction.

Finally, PFAL and HR&A will collaborate on producing a memo report that summarizes the team’s findings and recommends a path for procurement of the preferred housing development option (i.e., securing an independent affordable housing developer or approach forms of bundling).

2. PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATED TASK(S) AND DELIVERABLE SUMMARY FOR

FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS AND PROJECT SCOPE TO INCLUDE UP THE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY (UP TO 3 ALTERNATIVE SITES), EXPANSION OF CIVIC CENTER PARK, AND ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT 11391 ACACIA PARKWAY (OWNED BY THE GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY).

PFAL’s work plan contemplates the following deliverables in Phase I:

Administrative:

l!.FALl
Project Finance
Ad,·isor)' Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 6

• Establish Project data room/file share
• Monthly progress reports
• Project Management tool: Active Issues list
• Project procurement schedule
Project deliverables:
• Two (2) massing sketches showing site fits for the Public Safety Facility, parking, and Civic Center Park; one (1) draft, one (1) final for each of the two (2) sites, with space needs adjustments as needed
• Finance and funding report (detailing available funding and financing options including but not limited to Measure O, ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) Funding, Bond Capacity, P3 financing) • Business Case Report (detailing technical, commercial, financial, and legal feasibility and affordability) including a recommendation for the procurement method that best meets the City’s goals and objectives, including a recommendation on the governance structure for the Civic Center Park and the procurement strategy for the preferred housing development option. The report will also include recommendations for concepts to consider for the existing police station. If desired by the City, the components of the Business Case Report can be delivered as available as described above.
• Qualitative site evaluation matrix to rank the preferred site alternative. • Financial model showing concept cost estimates for the full project lifecycle, other selection criteria for each of the two (2) sites assuming one delivery strategy for the Public Safety Facility and Civic Center Park, set up to run sensitivities

3. DETAIL YOUR PROJECT MANAGER'S EXPERIENCE WITH P3 PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS

RELATED TO BOTH CEQA (CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT) AND NEPA (NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT).

David Gloss has direct experience with CEQA and NEPA processes, having most recently been the point person for liaising with Sonoma County’s environmental permitting team and leading information exchanges with the federal government on the dual NEPA and CEQA processes being considered for the Sonoma County Government Center. David is well versed in all steps of the planning and environmental process necessary for project delivery, including managing and oversight of public involvement and stakeholder engagement teams, interagency coordination, definition of project purpose and need, alternatives analyses, evaluation of environmental impacts, and mitigation strategies. David has worked previously in environmental planning roles for various California projects including the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (“SMART”) commuter rail project in Northern California. For the SMART Project, David’s work included drafting environmental documentation of the Federal Transit Administration NEPA process through work on the Alternatives Analysis as well as Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report under NEPA/CEQA. David’s work also supported the drafting of

l!.FALl
Project Finance
Ad,·isor)' Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 7

various environmental documents such as Environmental Assessment/Initial Study level work, Categorical Exclusions, and EIR/EIS level work for clients in Southern California and Illinois including LA Metro, Illinois Department of Transportation Prairie Parkway, Chicago Transit Authority, Red Line Extension Project, Yellow Line Extension Project, and Orange Line Extension Project. David also assisted the Maryland Department of Transportation to ensure necessary NEPA documentation was complete for project procurement for the 16- mile light rail transit P3 project.

Also, from a project procurement standpoint in the government building sector, David worked with staff from Miami-Dade County to ensure environmental, planning, permitting, and entitlements were in place from a lender/due diligence perspective for the successful procurement of the Miami-Dade County Courthouse project in southern Florida.

In addition to David’s experience, various members of the project team have experience working through CEQA/NEPA processes on projects. Caroline Judy completed a NEPA process on a fuel cell project in Santa Clara County and on other energy efficiency projects under 2009 ARRA (American Recovery & Reinvestment Act) projects. Caroline also has experience navigating the challenges of CEQA litigation, having recent experience on a County property sale effort in Sonoma.

Our backgrounds and familiarity with NEPA and CEQA processes, and in particular the benefits of dual tracking these processes, will help us anticipate issues in this workstream. David and the PFAL team will be able to manage the City’s consultant who would lead the NEPA/CEQA process.

4. DETAIL THE ANTICIPATED NUMBER OF MEETINGS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,

PROJECT MEETINGS, INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS, PUBLIC MEETINGS INCLUDING PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL.

The meetings contemplated in our budget and scope are as follows:
• Kick-off meeting
• Confirm Goals and Objectives Meeting (City project team + stakeholders) • Weekly standing video calls with City team, 1 meeting per month in person • Internal consulting team bi-monthly standing calls
• Monthly calls with Placeworks/City outreach team
• 4 presentations of findings to City staff, Planning Commission and City Council • Public presentations (2) at Placeworks-led meetings
• Attendance at 2 additional public meetings

l!.FALl
Project Finance
Ad,·isor)' Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 8

5. UPDATE TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE I TASKS
Our updated timeline for Phase I is as follows:

6. PROVIDE A SEPARATE COST AND BUDGET SUMMARY OF TASKS FOR EACH

SUBCONTRACTOR(S) AND/OR PROJECT TEAM MEMBER FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLETION OF PHASE 1 TASKS.

The City has requested an expansion in our proposed scope to include the Civic Center Park revisioning and housing analysis. Our full team has tried to be as cost-efficient as possible in this update fee proposal. Our pricing is aggressive for the scope of work we have committed to provide, but we are certain we can deliver as promised for the proposed scope at the proposed fee level.

The following key assumptions have been used to develop the detailed budget for the “core” scope of work for Phase 1:

 The Dewberry Report is wholly reliable. The fees are thus reflective of the Public Safety space needs program with limited program updates/validation (e.g., remote work office changes).  Site fit / massing diagram and associated cost estimate is limited to one draft and one final iteration for the two alternative locations. Any conceptual design work falls under the optional scope.  Financial model will incorporate no more than 3 combinations of variables (i.e., sensitivities).  Written memos and reports require no more than 2 sets of revisions.  Public engagement is managed by the City directly. The PFAL Team would work alongside the City’s public and stakeholder involvement team and support that work for the project including for the environmental review processes and throughout the Procurement processes.

Garden Grove Public Safety + Park + Housing
Proposed Timeline for Delivery of services Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TASKS
Time
(weeks)
Start Date
1-Aug-22
8-Aug-22
15-Aug-22
22-Aug-22
29-Aug-22
5-Sep-22
12-Sep-22
19-Sep-22
26-Sep-22
3-Oct-22
10-Oct-22
17-Oct-22
12 Collate and review relevant project material 2
Develop and maintain project schedule and priority issues list 1 Site and program review 2
Review/confirm estimated costs, revenues, system financing, funding 10 Financial/cash flow modeling showing cost estimates 8
Site fit and massing 2
Funding and finance review & affordability analysis, report 7 Public Safety Facility site visit 2
Delivery method identification, business case report 4
City approval to commence procurement 1
Stakeholder buy-in, presentations to city staff, council, and public 12 Housing reports review, analysis, and letter report 7

..

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd .

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 9

# Task Description Lead Firm Original Proposal
Budget BAFO Budget
1 Collate and review relevant project
material
PFAL + HOK +
HR&A $6,600 $5,900
2 Review Civic Center Park master plan and
conceptual designs HOK $6,300
3 Develop and maintain project schedule
and priority issues list PFAL $1,500 $1,500
4 Review and confirm program HOK $7,200
5 Review and confirm estimated costs,
revenues, system financing, funding PFAL $5,980 $5,980
6 Financial/cash flow modeling PFAL $9,260 $9,260
7 Funding and finance review – analysis
and report PFAL $5,170 $5,170
8 Business case – analysis and report
incorporating housing development
option
PFAL $12,030 $12,030
9 Project Management (meetings, advisor
coordination, Q&A, invoicing, etc.) PFAL $6,540 $6,540
10 Meeting participation, stakeholder buy-
in + public engagement meeting
attendance
PFAL + HOK $7,710 $15,810
11 Evaluating Existing Project Data
(Cost-related) Dharam $1,925 $1,925
12 Evaluate and provide PSB and Central
Park capital cost opinion and high-level
construction schedule.

Dharam $3,010 $3,010
13 Site specific massing (PSF and Park),
decreased to 3 sites, increased to
include Civic Center Park
HOK $24,300 $16,650
14 Civic center park O&M (Operations &
Maintenance) costs and governance HR&A $11,418
15 Site identification HR&A $5,000 $0
16 Site visit to HOK Public Safety Building HOK + PFAL $770 17 Provide concept recommendations on
future re-use/decommissioning of the
current police station facility with
preliminary schematic for 1 option
PFAL + HOK $10,455
18 Budget Contingency $15,000
Public Safety and Civic Center Park Subtotal $89,025 $134,918 19 Housing - market scan HR&A $15,070
20 Housing - financial analysis HR&A $11,070
21 Housing - Affordable housing analysis &
recommendations
HR&A + PFAL $20,390
Housing Subtotal $46,530

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 10

PHASE 2 – PROCESS OF PROCUREMENT

1. IF MARKET SOUNDING IS IDENTIFIED WITHIN YOUR RESPECTIVE PROPOSAL, THE CITY'S REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE PART OF ALL DISCUSSIONS AND MEETINGS.

PLEASE INCLUDE THIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WITHIN YOUR BFO PROPOSAL.

Yes, City representatives will be part of all discussions and meetings. A market sounding has several benefits, two of which are: (1) explaining the project to the market and generating enthusiasm while sharing information to help well-qualified teams form early and (2) to help build consensus among owner stakeholders and to provide information and education to City staff.

2. DETAIL THE RFQ (REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS) PROCESS OF PROCUREMENT AND ANTICIPATED PROCESS FOR IMPLEMENTATION.

The RFQ process in Phase 2 will be informed by the conclusions and recommendations in Phase 1.

Therefore, we have provided a description of several potential methodologies that could be deployed during this Phase. Importantly, Phase 2 could be amended to incorporate the procurement of a housing developer. For purposes of this BAFO, we have focused specifically on describing the process to identify a developer to design and build the Public Safety Facility and revisioned Civic Center Park.

The important deliverables during Phase 2 are:

Evaluation Criteria PFAL will work with the City early on to develop the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess qualifications and proposals. Putting this work at the front of the procurement helps to align stakeholder views about what the City is looking for in its P3 partner and how they will be selected.

Procurement
Documents
PFAL will work in close conjunction with the City’s engineer, technical staff, lawyers, and the end users of the facility to help the City define and draft the RFQ and RFP and drop-down documents such as Technical Requirements and performance specifications. These documents will shape the procurement and impact the competitive dynamics that will drive value.

DB contract and/or
full Project
Agreement
Ideally, this document will allocate financial and technical risks to the Project parties best able to manage those risks. The team, along with the City’s lawyers and possible external counsel, will play an active role in ensuring that the City’s interests are protected while looking to allocate delivery risks in the most efficient manner.

Evaluation The team will have an active role in evaluating proposals, helping to determine whether the submittals are compliant, and facilitating evaluation of the proposals along the pre-agreed criteria.

As the scope of the Project and the associated procurement strategy that will be adopted in Phase 2 are contingent on the decisions in Phase 1, the pattern of meetings with the City will be determined once Phase 1 has been concluded. It is likely, however, that the team will participate in confidential, in-person, meetings to support the City as it negotiates the Project documentation with the shortlisted bidders.

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 11

Potential Delivery Method – Example Procurement Schedule Comparison Chart

Option 1
Traditional Delivery
Option 2
DBFOM Hard Bid Delivery
Option 3
DBF PDA Delivery
CEQA review begins/preferred
site identified
CEQA review begins/preferred
site identified
CEQA review begins/preferred
site identified
Draft evaluation criteria, RFQ,
RFP, and DB Contract
Draft evaluation criteria, RFQ, RFP
including Project Agreement and
performance specifications
Draft evaluation criteria, RFQ, and
Project Agreement including
performance specifications
Initiate DB Hard Bid Procurement
– issue RFQ

Approve Hard Bid, RFQ shortlist Approve and initiate DBFOM Hard Bid Procurement – issue RFQ
Initiate Predevelopment
Agreement (PDA) Procurement –
RFQ release
Shortlist reviews and selection Shortlist reviews and selection Approve PDA RFQ shortlist Issue PDA RFP
CEQA review ends, site confirmed CEQA review ends, site confirmed CEQA review ends, site confirmed

Issue Hard Bid RFP Issue Hard Bid RFP Proposal Development Proposal Development Proposal Development PDA Proposal Due Date Hard Bid Proposal Due Date
Evaluate; select preferred
proposer; award
Proposal Due Date

Evaluate; select preferred
proposer; award
Finalize, approve, and execute DB
Agreement
Evaluate; select preferred
proposer; award

Negotiate, approve, and execute
PDA with selected Developer
Scope and budget adjustments as
needed
Finalize and execute DBFOM
Project Agreement
PDA phase work begins (including
negotiation of DBF Project
Agreement)
Financial Close
Notice to Proceed
Design & Construction
Commences
Financial Close
Notice to Proceed
Design & Construction
Commences
Scope and budget adjustments as
needed
Finalize DBF Agreement
Approve and execute DBF
Agreement
PDA Phase Work ends
Financial Close
Notice to Proceed
Design & Construction
Commences
Occupancy DATE TBD (based on
construction period)
Occupancy DATE TBD (based on
construction period)
Occupancy DATE TBD (based on
construction period)

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 12

4. PROVIDE A SEPARATE COST AND BUDGET SUMMARY OF TASKS FOR EACH

SUBCONTRACTOR(S) AND/OR PROJECT TEAM MEMBER FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLETION OF PHASE 2 TASKS.

The outcomes of the Phase 1 work will determine the procurement scope and strategy for subsequent phases (Phases 2-5). Given the unknown conclusions of Phase 1, Phase 2 and 3 Budgets are estimates based on our experience delivering these services.
(i) Phase 2
As is typical, we anticipate that the soft costs associated with a Design Build project delivery will constitute approximately 12-15% of the total project cost, and these will vary depending on the contract terms. The project management support that would be provided by the PFAL team (including program, design, commercial, and technical support) typically constitutes 3-4% of the total project cost. Here we have provided a rough indication of costs based on Option 1 and Option 2. These costs are indicative only and subject to refinement depending on the size and scale of the project as well as the selected delivery option.

# Task Description Lead Firm
Option 1 Task
Indicative
Budget
Option 2 Task
Indicative
Budget
1 Undertake market outreach, RFI and convention circuit to gather feedback and publicize project PFAL $15,000 $15,000 2 Develop RFQ PFAL $50,000 $75,000
3 Prepare grant/federal financing alternatives PFAL $15,000 $15,000 4 Prepare dataroom for bidders PFAL $1,000 $1,000
5 Launch RFQ PFAL $10,000 $10,000
6 Review qualification packages PFAL $20,000 $60,000
7 Development of RFP and PA PFAL $50,000 $125,000
8 Manage dataroom PFAL $2,500 $5,000
9 Launch RFP and PA PFAL $5,000 $10,000
10 Negotiate PA with bidders PFAL $20,000 $100,000
11 Review and evaluate proposals/facilitate selection PFAL $25,000 $125,000 12 Stakeholder buy-in including preliminary schematics PFAL + HOK $15,000 $20,000 13 Technical input to procurement documents, performance specifications, technical evaluation Altus $75,000 $100,000 14 Update Project Cost ROM and proposed construction
schedule Dharam $30,000 $30,000
15 Develop RFQ/RFP project cost evaluation criteria Dharam $30,000 $40,000 16 Performance Specifications HOK $5,000 $10,000
17 Proposal requirements HOK $5,000 $15,000
18 Respond to RFIs - not to exceed hours PFAL + HOK $10,000 $20,000 19 High-level Proposal compliance review for design intent HOK $5,000 $10,000 20 Attend first round confidential meeting (2 days) HOK $10,000 $10,000 21 Develop real estate issues HR&A $0 $20,000
Total $398,500 $816,000

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 13

PHASES 3, 4, AND 5
The Execution Stage itself comprises three phases: (i) Phase 3 – the Exclusive Negotiation Period; (ii) Phase 4 – the Construction Period; and (iii) Phase 5 – Operations. The prior Preparation Stage culminated in the selection of a preferred bidder. In Phase 3, we will finalize the terms of the Project documentation and will end with execution of these documents at a commercial/financial close. From beginning to end, Phase 3 is estimated to last 24 weeks (about 5 and a half months). Phases 4 and 5 represent post-close phases of the procurement. The team’s tasks at this point are focused on helping the City to implement and enforce the contract to ensure performance of maintenance and operations requirements. The figure below summarizes:

Figure 1 - Phases of the Execution Stage

The following table summarizes the tasks, deliverables, timing requirements of each phase within the Execution Stage.

Phase 3: Exclusive Negotiation Period
Finalize project
documentation
Execute project
documentation
Phase 4: Construction Period
Contract implementation and
compliance
Financial model
updates/training
Waiver management
Owner's representative
Phase 5: Operations
Contract implementation
and compliance
Financial model
updates/training
Waiver management
Owner's representative

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES 14

Table 1 - Task Breakdown of Phases in the Execution Stage

6. CONCLUSION
The team constituents, PFAL, HOK, Altus Group, HR&A, and Dharam Consulting, afford the City excellent qualifications across the four essential disciplines of procurement advice: financial/commercial, technical, design, and development. The team can draw on the broadest and deepest cross section of highly relevant experience to help the City determine the most appropriate procurement strategy; one that will deliver best value and is manageable within the City’s requirements.

On behalf of the wider team, PFAL thanks the City for the opportunity to work on the Garden Grove Civic Center Project.

APPENDICES
APPENDIX I – OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL SCOPE ITEMS
APPENDIX II – STAFF RATES 2022
APPENDIX III – HIGHLINE EXPERIENCE
APPENDIX IV – SAN FRANCISCO CRIME LAB & POLICE STATION

Phase Tasks Deliverables

Estimated
Timing
Requirements
Phase 3
 Negotiate PA with preferred bidder
 Finalize Program Design
 Finalize Plan of Financing
 Finalize Construction & O&M
arrangements
 Finalize Project Documentation
 Final PA
 Commercial/financial close 24 weeks
Phases 4 and 5  Contract implementation and
compliance
 Financial model updates/training
 Waiver management
 Owner's representative
 Enforcement of performance
requirements
 Training
 Waiver assessment/recommendations
 Owner’s representative reports
To be
confirmed

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

APPENDIX I

Optional Additional Scope Items

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES APPENDIX I

WORK PLAN – PHASE (1) OPTIONAL SCOPE
To present a budget that is both responsive to the RFP and cost effective, PFAL has proposed a Phase (1) Core Scope of Work that is dependent on specific assumptions. Our experience tells us that certain additional services may be attractive to the City for community and stakeholder engagement, project definition, and support for the recommended project delivery method. Here we presented these optional items to give the City choices and a reasonable expectation around the fee implications of additional services.
 Value-for-Money (VfM) Study
 Risk Assessment
 Risk Review/Workshop (Public Safety)
 Risk Review/Workshop (Parks/Open Spaces)
 Risk Review/Workshop (Affordable Housing)
 Design Visioning Session - in person (Owner)
 Program Validation - remote (Owner)
 [Additional] Site test fit - remote (Owner)
 Architectural Room data sheets - remote (no engineers)  Program Narratives
 Co-ordination Meetings (HOK and PFAL)
 Iterative design process support / Risk analysis / Ownership, governance, and delivery analysis / P3 suitability test and VFM analysis
 Public realm capital funding
 Public realm programming and governance
 Real estate market analysis
 Real estate financial analysis
 Affordable housing analysis

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

APPENDIX II

Staff Rates

PFAL

GARDEN GROVE CIVIC CENTER - P3 CONSULTING SERVICES APPENDIX II

STAFF RATES - 2022

Vice President/Engagement Lead PFAL $320
President/Project Oversight, Deputy Project Manager PFAL $350 Managing Director/Procurement Strategist PFAL $340
Manager/Model Lead PFAL $300
Associate/Analyst and Modeler PFAL $290
Director/Technical Lead Altus $315
Senior Director/Technical Advisor Altus $415
Director/Technical Advisor Altus $300
Associate Director/Technical Advisor Altus $275
Senior Cost Consultant/Technical Advisor Altus $240
Cost Consultant/Technical Advisor Altus $175
Director Dharam $210
Director Dharam $210
Senior Consultant Dharam $175
Principal in Charge HOK $380
Project Manager HOK $250
Planner Programmer HOK $350
Lead Designer HOK $320
Structural Engineer HOK $310
Mechanical Engineer HOK $205
Electrical Engineer HOK $230
Plumbing Engineer HOK $215
Security HOK $315
Sustainability HOK $230
Specifications HOK $260
Partner HR&A $450
Partner HR&A $450
Principal HR&A $395
Director HR&A $345
Senior Analyst HR&A $255
Analyst HR&A $200
Partner HR&A $450

Project Finance
Advisory Ltd.

APPENDIX III

Highline Experience

PFAL
Determining the Economic Benefit of
Transforming the High Line

CLIENT
Friends of the High Line

LOCATION
New York, NY
YEAR
2013

SERVICES
‒ Economic Impact Analysis
‒ Funding & Financing Strategy
‒ Market Analysis
‒ Governance Strategy

REFERENCE
Adam Ganser
Vice President of Planning and
Design
Friends of the High Line
[email protected]
(212) 206-9922

Friends of the High Line crafted the business case for
transforming a formerly abandoned railway into a
vibrant public park using HR&A’s economic benefits
analysis and land use strategies.

CHALLENGE
When Friends of the High Line sought to convert the High Line, an abandoned railway on Manhattan’s west side, into a public park, HR&A prepared an economic and fiscal impact study to demonstrate that the economic and social benefits of converting the rail line would far outweigh the necessary capital costs of development.

SOLUTION
In addition to assessing the economic and fiscal benefits of converting the High Line to a public park, HR&A also worked with the Friends of the High Line and the New York City Department of Planning to develop an innovative rezoning overlay that encouraged surrounding development to preserve and protect the park. This overlay transferred air rights to nearby land parcels and consisted of three parts: a floor area transfer mechanism to preserve light, air and views of the park; a floor area bonus in exchange for building park access, structural restoration and open space development; and special bulk regulations that built on the surrounding neighborhood’s distinct cultural and artistic character.

IMPACT
The award-winning West Chelsea rezoning ultimately preserved private property rights, protected the historic railway structure, catalyzed contextual real estate development, and enhanced the position of West Chelsea and the Meatpacking District as the center for art and culture in Manhattan.

The High Line has now hosted over seven million visitors, and over 30 development projects have been planned or developed in the area. Since HR&A’s initial projections, the High Line has generated $52 billion in net new economic activity for the City and will contribute $1 billion in tax revenues by 2027, which exceeds the City’s investment by 800 percent.

.

The High Line + The
High Line 18th Street
Plaza
This project is a 1.5-mile-long ele-
vated park in the heart of mid-town
Manhattan.

Our cost team have worked on
phase 2 and 3 of The High Line
project, providing cost management
services including budget setting,
cost estimating and reconciliation
with the CM.

In addition, our cost team have pro-
vided cost management and value
engineering services during multi-
ple design stages on a new 9,500
SF at-grade plaza located between
West 17th and West 18th Street at
the High Line, which includes pav-
ing, built-in and movable furnish-
ings, canopy trees, and understory
plantings.

LOCATION
New York, NY

SERVICES
Cost Estimating Services
SIZE
7 acres

SERVICE DATES
2013 -2017

APPENDIX IV

HOK’s San Francisco Police and Crime Lab

PFAL

11 • I I
I

L__

I

Agenda Item - 5.c.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Scott C. Stiles From: Lisa L. Kim
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community and Economic
Development
Subject: Approval of a Commercial
Purchase Agreement and
Joint Escrow Instructions
with KJ Investments Group
LLC for property located at
11277 Garden Grove
Boulevard. (Cost:
$8,049,000) (Action Item)
Date: 7/12/2022

OBJECTIVE
For City Council's approval for the City to enter into a Commercial Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions with KJ Investment Group, LLC for the acquisition of 11277 Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove.

BACKGROUND
In May 2022, the City Council approved an interim Lease Agreement with KJ Investments Group that provided for leasing of 15,250 square feet, second floor office space located at 11277 Garden Grove Boulevard. The proposed offices would accommodate additional work space needed for the Police Department Special Resources Team and Community Liaison Unit. The lease term provided for one-year term with five (5) one-year extensions at a monthly rate of $1.25 per square foot or $19,062.50 on a monthly basis. Currently, an assessment of minor renovation work is in process to prepare the offices for occupancy.

DISCUSSION
Through an expression of interest, KJ Investments Group inquired if the City of Garden Grove would be interested in advancing the Option to Purchase for acquisition of property located at 11277 Garden Grove Boulevard (the “Property”) pursuant to the approved Lease Agreement (Attachment No. 1). The Property is improved with a two-story office building containing 30,835 gross square feet, approximately 30,500 net rentable square feet, currently configured with eight office units. The building was originally constructed in 1980 and a surface parking lot containing 146 spaces. Per the Assessor’s mapping, the Assessor Parcel Number is 090-171-35 and the lot size is 1.85 acres or 80,586 square feet.

Staff and KJ Investment Group began property acquisition negotiations. The terms of the Commercial Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (Attachment No. 2a and 2b) outlines a negotiated purchase price of $7,999,000 which is within the Fair Market Value appraisal range of $7,900,000 to $8,250,000 determined by R.P.

Laurain & Associates, Inc. Also, a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Report prepared by Leighton Consulting concluded no further assessment was recommended. KJ Investments Group has requested an accelerated escrow closing on or about July 22, 2022. Following Council consideration this evening, coordination with the escrow company and title officer will be underway.

In summary, acquisition of 11277 Garden Grove Blvd will offer strategic planning benefits for the future and modernization of the GGPD public safety facility. The property location within the Civic Center area is ideal to serve as interim GGPD building during future construction or potentially become an alternative site for a new GGPD public safety facility location. Work associated with project feasibility and site alternative analysis is part of the Civic Center Community Engagement effort.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted in the Biennial Budget for FY 2021-2022 and FY 2022-2023 for the civic center/public safety facilities project.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve the Commercial Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions with KJ Investment Group, LLC for the acquisition of 11277 Garden Grove Boulevard by the City in the amount of $7,999,000, and an amount $50,000 for escrow and title related costs; and,
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions on behalf of the City, and make minor modifications thereto as needed.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Attachment No. 1
- Lease
Agreement
6/30/2022 Agreement GG_LEASE_11277_Garden_Grove_Blvd_(Final_050322).pdf Attachment No.
2a - Purchase
Agreement
7/8/2022 Agreement DOC-20220708-10_00_03.pdf
Attachment 2b -
Purchase
Agreement
(Addendum 1)
7/8/2022 Agreement DOC-20220708-09_53_39.pdf

•
•

1 1672809.2

LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN

KJ INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
AND

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

This Lease Agreement ( “Lease”) is made and entered into by and between KJ INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC (“Landlord”) and CITY OF GARDEN GROVE , a California municipal corporation ("Tenant") as of July 1, 2022. Landlord and Tenant are referenced in the aggregate as the “Parties” and sometimes, when a provision applies to each of them individually, as a “Party.”
Recitals

A. Landlord currently owns certain real property located at 11277 Garden Grove Blvd., in the
City of Garden Grove, California, Assessor’s Parcel No. 090-171-35 ("Premises"). Tenant wishes to lease the second floor of the Premises, which is comprised of approximately 15,250
sq. ft. of leasable office space, suite numbers 200 to 220.

B. Tenant wishes to
use the leased Premises for office uses for its police department.

C. Landlord has agreed to let the Premises to Tenant subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease.

D. Tenant shall further have the option to purchase the Premises subject to the terms and conditions hereof.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

Agreement

1. Lease of Premises.
(a) Landlord hereby leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord, the entire second floor of the Premises
according to the terms of this Lease.
(b) The Effective Date of this Lease is October 1, 2022. It is understood by the Parties that Landlord shall have completed the one-time repair/maintenance items listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, prior to the Effective Date.

2. Rent.
(a) Monthly Base Rent. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord, without notice or demand, offset or deduction, monthly rent in the sum o f Nineteen Thousand Sixty-Two Dollars and Fifty Cents ($19,062.50) per month commencing on the Effective Date, in advance, on or before the 5 th day of each month.
(b ) Proration. Rent for any period which is less than one month shall be a prorated portion of the monthly installment based upon a 30 day month. Rent shall be paid to Landlord DocuSign Envelope ID: D577DEE2-B6E9-4E6F-9902-E9DA57544C6B