Agenda, first session — Garden Grove City Council, June 27, 2023 (part 2 of 4)

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 31
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00036993 H2684 WESTMINSTER HOUSING PARTNER, LP 05/01/2023 $10,053.00 00036994 H1025 WESTPARK APTS 05/01/2023 $2,108.00 00036995 H2986 CINDY OR ED WICK 05/01/2023 $934.00 00036996 H00437 WILLIAMS STRATTON FAMILY LLC 05/01/2023 $1,670.00 00036997 H0029 WILLOWICK ROYAL 05/01/2023 $476.00 00036998 H4424 WILSHIRE CREST 05/01/2023 $1,950.00 00036999 H4523 WINDMILL APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $4,853.00 00037000 H4608 WINDWOOD GLEN APTS 05/01/2023 $1,195.00 00037001 H9109 WINNIE INVESTMENT 05/01/2023 $7,311.00 00037002 H3286 WINSTON PLACE, LLC 05/01/2023 $1,221.00 00037003 H4232 WONDERFUL IDEA, LLC 05/01/2023 $1,462.00 00037004 H5169 GIN O WONG 05/01/2023 $8,499.00 00037005 H00413 JULIA WONG 05/01/2023 $1,604.00 00037006 H3592 PHILLIP WONG 05/01/2023 $1,643.00 00037007 H4709 WOODBRIDGE VILLAS APARTMENT HOMES 05/01/2023 $1,216.00 00037008 H4762 WOODBRIDGE WILLOWS 05/01/2023 $4,141.00 00037009 H00184 XIAOLIN WU 05/01/2023 $1,380.00 00037010 H00398 TINA PI-YU YAO 05/01/2023 $1,356.00 00037011 H0165 LEON SHU YAU 05/01/2023 $1,699.00 00037012 H4806 JIYUN YEOM 05/01/2023 $2,808.00 00037013 H00190 JAIMIE L YIANG 05/01/2023 $1,508.00 00037014 H00333 YORBA LINDA ALTRUDY LP 05/01/2023 $1,008.00 00037015 H4168 HENRY H YOUNG 05/01/2023 $1,686.00 00037016 H4596 EUGENIA ZASLAVSKY 05/01/2023 $4,750.00 00037017 H3730 GEORGE ZHAO 05/01/2023 $1,427.00 00686494 H00411 1600 W BROADWAY LLC 05/01/2023 $1,939.00 00686495 H00284 8550 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE LLC 05/01/2023 $1,302.00 00686496 H4194 WILLIAM ADAMS 05/01/2023 $1,150.00 00686497 H00238 ADVANCE GLOBAL ASSET GROUP INC 05/01/2023 $915.00 00686498 H00248 ADVANCED GROUP 05-85 A CAL LTD PARTNERSHIP 05/01/2023 $1,428.00 00686499 H4534 ALISO VIEJO 621, LP 05/01/2023 $1,306.00 00686500 H00290 ALLEPHESIANS 1, LLC 05/01/2023 $1,730.00 00686501 H2616 ANAHEIM REVITALIZATION II PART 05/01/2023 $2,628.00 00686502 H4705 ANAHEIM REVITALIZATION IV PARTNERS, LP 05/01/2023 $1,541.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 144 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 32
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686503 H4722 ANAHEIM REVITALIZATION PARTNERS III LP 05/01/2023 $1,769.00 00686504 H7330 BAHIA VILLAGE MOBILEHOME PARK 05/01/2023 $931.00 00686505 H00070 BRIDGE WF CA CRYSTAL VIEW LP 05/01/2023 $2,499.00 00686506 H0950 RICHARD BUI JR 05/01/2023 $2,428.00 00686507 H00155 CRYSTAL BUI 05/01/2023 $1,904.00 00686508 H3596 JIMMY QUOC BUI 05/01/2023 $3,813.00 00686509 H4355 LAN HUYNH NGOC BUI 05/01/2023 $997.00 00686510 H0432 PHAT BUI 05/01/2023 $2,945.00 00686511 H1455 SON MINH BUI 05/01/2023 $1,400.00 00686512 H4756 TAN H BUI 05/01/2023 $1,460.00 00686513 H4238 TINH TIEN BUI 05/01/2023 $1,910.00 00686514 H00130 BUNGALOWS 05/01/2023 $1,816.00 00686515 H00247 CASA LA VETA ASSOCIATES 05/01/2023 $1,920.00 00686516 H00261 CASTILIAN A CA LP 05/01/2023 $2,144.00 00686517 H9009 CHANTECLAIR APTS 05/01/2023 $1,315.00 00686518 H00127 RICHARD N CHAO 05/01/2023 $1,301.00 00686519 H2701 DAVID CHEN 05/01/2023 $1,295.00 00686520 H4671 ROBERT CHRISTMAN 05/01/2023 $2,646.00 00686521 H00358 ANH CHU 05/01/2023 $1,818.00 00686522 H4617 MEI-LING CHU 05/01/2023 $1,036.00 00686523 H4773 CMIF III CORONADO PALMS, LLC 05/01/2023 $1,439.00 00686524 H00227 CORDOVA A CA LP 05/01/2023 $3,988.00 00686525 H00344 CORTESIA AT RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 05/01/2023 $2,596.00 00686526 H4380 CRESTWOOD ON 7, LLC 05/01/2023 $2,460.00 00686527 H00072 KHANH DANG 05/01/2023 $1,382.00 00686528 H00106 HAROLD E DELONG 05/01/2023 $1,347.00 00686529 H00323 NHI DIEP 05/01/2023 $1,508.00 00686530 H4690 KIM-ANH T DINH 05/01/2023 $6,769.00 00686531 H00446 CHINH DO 05/01/2023 $2,581.00 00686532 H4533 MINH TAM DO 05/01/2023 $1,344.00 00686533 H4222 THUAN DO 05/01/2023 $1,338.00 00686534 H3422 DINH T DOAN 05/01/2023 $1,310.00 00686535 H00043 MICHAEL DOAN 05/01/2023 $1,206.00 00686536 H1395 HELMUT DONNER 05/01/2023 $2,450.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 145 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 33
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686537 H4348 LAN DUONG 05/01/2023 $1,401.00 00686538 H00377 EIGHT 80 NEWPORT BEACH 05/01/2023 $1,504.00 00686539 H4187 EL CAMINO LU, LLC 05/01/2023 $1,793.00 00686540 H3075 EMERALD GARDENS APT 05/01/2023 $805.00 00686541 H5060 EUCLID PARK APTS 05/01/2023 $1,763.00 00686542 H00236 FENWAY APTS 05/01/2023 $1,769.00 00686543 H4813 FENWAY PROPERTIES 05/01/2023 $1,490.00 00686544 H00399 FIVE COVES 05/01/2023 $1,911.00 00686545 H2768 DALE A FULLWOOD 05/01/2023 $1,332.00 00686546 H00415 FUSION PROPERTY MANAGMENT COMPANY 05/01/2023 $1,491.00 00686547 H4193 GROVE PARK, LLC 05/01/2023 $4,082.00 00686548 H00389 HANNA PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 05/01/2023 $2,108.00 00686549 H3218 KULJIT HARA 05/01/2023 $1,141.00 00686550 H1979 STEVE HARA 05/01/2023 $6,490.00 00686551 H00221 HAUPT PROPERTIES, LLC C/O DROUIN REALTY 05/01/2023 $1,040.00 00686552 H4703 HERMOSA VILLAGE PHASE I HOUSING PARTNERS, LP 05/01/2023 $2,427.00 00686553 H1873 JAMES HOANG 05/01/2023 $1,438.00 00686554 H3022 NICK HOFFMAN 05/01/2023 $2,298.00 00686555 H00355 HOYT REAL ESTATE INC 05/01/2023 $1,762.00 00686556 H00429 HTN RENTALS LLC 05/01/2023 $2,525.00 00686557 H3140 CHONG WEI HUANG 05/01/2023 $952.00 00686558 H00240 HUNTINGTON POINTE 2019 LP 05/01/2023 $1,471.00 00686559 H4810 DOANH HUYNH 05/01/2023 $1,628.00 00686560 H3473 NATALIE N HUYNH 05/01/2023 $1,359.00 00686561 H00404 STEPHANIE HUYNH 05/01/2023 $860.00 00686562 H3095 TRANG HUYNH 05/01/2023 $4,198.00 00686563 H00329 IHLLC HOLDINGS I LLC 05/01/2023 $2,501.00 00686564 H3801 IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES LP 05/01/2023 $4,110.00 00686565 H00224 JAMES K SKEOCH DECEDENT'S TRUST 05/01/2023 $3,732.00 00686566 H00254 STEPHEN JOHNSON 05/01/2023 $1,477.00 00686567 H3109 LINDA JOHNSON 05/01/2023 $2,598.00 00686568 H4584 JOON CHOI VDS APARTMENT LLC 05/01/2023 $11,993.00 00686569 H2641 KDF HERMOSA, LP 05/01/2023 $4,644.00 00686570 H3083 KDF MALABAR, LP 05/01/2023 $35,689.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 146 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 34
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686571 H2403 KDF SEA WIND, LP 05/01/2023 $869.00 00686572 H00217 VI KIM 05/01/2023 $1,548.00 00686573 H3683 WILLIAM KUNZMAN 05/01/2023 $1,611.00 00686574 H00302 LA COSTA 05/01/2023 $3,480.00 00686575 H00117 ANH T LAM 05/01/2023 $796.00 00686576 H4284 LE FAMILY TRUST 05/01/2023 $819.00 00686577 H1638 DON LE 05/01/2023 $974.00 00686578 H00450 MICHAEL PHUC LE 05/01/2023 $3,133.00 00686579 H1531 TRACEY LE 05/01/2023 $1,420.00 00686580 H1423 VIET Q LE 05/01/2023 $1,309.00 00686581 H0298 YENNHI LE 05/01/2023 $1,133.00 00686582 H4132 HOABINH LE-MUNZER 05/01/2023 $1,369.00 00686583 H00223 LAWRENCE B LEBLANC 05/01/2023 $12,281.00 00686584 H4694 DOUG LEONG 05/01/2023 $1,539.00 00686585 H00440 LEXINGTON COURTYARD MANAGEMENT LLC 05/01/2023 $1,837.00 00686586 H0216 ALICE LIAO 05/01/2023 $3,189.00 00686587 H00066 DAVID A LO 05/01/2023 $1,741.00 00686588 H4765 MAI LUONG 05/01/2023 $3,400.00 00686589 H00442 ANH KIM MA 05/01/2023 $2,489.00 00686590 H0958 WILLIAM T MACDONALD 05/01/2023 $5,595.00 00686591 H00132 DAVID E MADJE 05/01/2023 $11,714.00 00686592 H00423 JOSE L MADRIGAL 05/01/2023 $1,686.00 00686593 H1188 LARRY MAH 05/01/2023 $1,230.00 00686594 H2333 HANH T MAI-NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,585.00 00686595 H1861 TERRY MAMMEN 05/01/2023 $4,963.00 00686596 H4675 ZHIYAN MAO 05/01/2023 $2,836.00 00686597 H00279 ODETTE MIKHAIL 05/01/2023 $1,715.00 00686598 H3043 MONARK, LP 05/01/2023 $5,711.00 00686599 H0780 MONTEJO APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $3,662.00 00686600 H00353 MONTICELLO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 05/01/2023 $1,365.00 00686601 H00274 NEWPORT HOUSING PARTNERS LP 05/01/2023 $1,782.00 00686602 H00152 BRIGHTON QUOCSI NGO 05/01/2023 $1,387.00 00686603 H2386 MARY NGO 05/01/2023 $6,188.00 00686604 H00114 AN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $802.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 147 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 35
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686605 H00420 BAONGOC NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $3,500.00 00686606 H1184 BICHLE T NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $4,371.00 00686607 H00270 HAIHA NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,651.00 00686608 H2192 HOC VAN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $2,237.00 00686609 H00397 JENNY NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $2,027.00 00686610 H4473 MAI NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $300.00 00686611 H00271 MINDY NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $2,019.00 00686612 H00175 NAM V NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,271.00 00686613 H4061 NGUYEN, NICOLE U 05/01/2023 $609.00 00686614 H00405 RYAN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $2,159.00 00686615 H4529 STEVEN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $987.00 00686616 H9044 THANH VAN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,541.00 00686617 H4682 THUY T NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $889.00 00686618 H00424 TU VAN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,783.00 00686619 H00332 TUAN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,595.00 00686620 H3103 NICOLE UYEN NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $480.00 00686621 H2879 PAULINE KIMPHUNG NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $4,799.00 00686622 H2526 SHERRY LIEU NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,606.00 00686623 H1027 TON SANH NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,305.00 00686624 H3114 TRACY NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $2,493.00 00686625 H2699 THUY-TIEN NGUYEN-TU 05/01/2023 $2,222.00 00686626 H3404 NORTHWOOD PLACE 05/01/2023 $4,781.00 00686627 H00212 OCEAN BREEZE VILLAS 05/01/2023 $4,471.00 00686628 H00041 OLIVIA THANH CAPITALS LLC 05/01/2023 $2,397.00 00686629 H00291 PALM ISLAND SENIOR APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $8,115.00 00686630 H00395 PARK CENTER PLACE 05/01/2023 $2,048.00 00686631 H00193 PARK RIDGE ENTERPRISE LP 05/01/2023 $1,420.00 00686632 H2739 CHONG PIL PARK 05/01/2023 $1,550.00 00686633 H4351 PAVILION PARK SENIOR 1 HOUSING PARTNERS, LP 05/01/2023 $1,994.00 00686634 H4582 ANH THI PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,523.00 00686635 H00414 CUONG KIM PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,865.00 00686636 H4800 DAVID VU PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,687.00 00686637 H00150 DON PHU PHAM 05/01/2023 $2,781.00 00686638 H00182 JULIE NGOC PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,218.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 148 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 36
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686639 H3817 QUYEN PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,346.00 00686640 H1049 TUNG PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,573.00 00686641 H00349 HARRISON PHAN 05/01/2023 $1,450.00 00686642 H4786 HUNG PHAN 05/01/2023 $2,873.00 00686643 H00303 JENNIFER PHAN 05/01/2023 $1,247.00 00686644 H00316 PINES APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $2,150.00 00686645 H4509 PLAZA WOODS, LLC 05/01/2023 $4,325.00 00686646 H4535 PORTOLA IRVINE, LP ANTON PORTOLA APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $1,748.00 00686647 H00320 PRALLE AND CASE NO. 2 LP 05/01/2023 $1,559.00 00686648 H4353 RAYMOND AND LYNN RUAIS 05/01/2023 $595.00 00686649 H00427 SAN JUAN A CA LP 05/01/2023 $1,042.00 00686650 H00283 SANTA ANA HOUSING AUTHORITY 05/01/2023 $6,463.65 00686651 H00325 SAVANNA BANANA LLC 05/01/2023 $1,321.00 00686652 H3488 CELESTE SCHWERMAN 05/01/2023 $1,150.00 00686653 H00322 SEA WIND 2016 LP 05/01/2023 $567.00 00686654 H00317 SEQUOIA EQUITIES HIDDEN HILLS 05/01/2023 $1,819.00 00686655 H4241 SILO NORTHEAST, LLC 05/01/2023 $3,526.00 00686656 H4590 CATHY TA 05/01/2023 $1,730.00 00686657 H00147 DANNY HOANG TA 05/01/2023 $1,545.00 00686658 H00342 TDT BUSHARD, LLC 05/01/2023 $866.00 00686659 H4409 TERESINA APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $1,311.00 00686660 H00113 THE HUNTINGTON PARTNERSHIP 05/01/2023 $1,836.00 00686661 H00087 THE RETREAT AT MIDWAY CITY (WSH MANAGEMENT) 05/01/2023 $3,087.00 00686662 H1959 THOMSON EQUITIES 05/01/2023 $1,294.00 00686663 H6710 THOMSON EQUITIES 05/01/2023 $1,369.00 00686664 H00422 TIC INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC 05/01/2023 $2,041.00 00686665 H4720 TIC INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC 05/01/2023 $2,449.00 00686666 H4726 TIC INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC 05/01/2023 $7,961.00 00686667 H00257 TKN DBA GROVESIDE LLC 05/01/2023 $1,410.00 00686668 H00343 TOMMY LEE & TIFFANY THUY PHAM 05/01/2023 $1,313.00 00686669 H4616 VINH THAT TON 05/01/2023 $1,887.00 00686670 H00075 IVY TONNU-MIHARA 05/01/2023 $1,346.00 00686671 H00331 ANTHONY P TRAN 05/01/2023 $1,355.00 00686672 H4688 ERIC TRAN 05/01/2023 $486.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 149 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between Apr 27, 2023 and May 1, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:52:22 AM Page 37
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686673 H00454 KELLY KHUONG TRAN 05/01/2023 $2,927.00 00686674 H3686 LIEN KIM TRAN-NGUYEN 05/01/2023 $1,006.00 00686675 H00273 TRIDER CORPORATION 05/01/2023 $794.00 00686676 H4493 TRANG N TRINH 05/01/2023 $1,301.00 00686677 H00056 LUCKY LUC TRUONG 05/01/2023 $1,199.00 00686678 H2335 THUAN BICH TRUONG 05/01/2023 $3,854.00 00686679 H2410 SON BICH TRUONG 05/01/2023 $1,523.00 00686680 H0146 ANGELO S TURI 05/01/2023 $2,721.00 00686681 H00338 UDR THE RESIDENCES AT BELLA TERRA 05/01/2023 $1,907.00 00686682 H2982 MARCO VELASTEGUI 05/01/2023 $1,754.00 00686683 H3943 VILLA CAPRI ESTATES 05/01/2023 $2,116.00 00686684 H2717 THUA VINH 05/01/2023 $857.00 00686685 H00373 VINKAYLA LLC 05/01/2023 $2,119.00 00686686 H4662 VISTA DEL SOL APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $1,501.00 00686687 H9103 VISTA DEL SOL APTS 05/01/2023 $1,375.00 00686688 H00430 BINH NGUYEN VO 05/01/2023 $1,539.00 00686689 H1723 KIMCHI VO 05/01/2023 $2,091.00 00686690 H00369 SAMANTHA VO 05/01/2023 $1,616.00 00686691 H3476 TIN TRUNG VO 05/01/2023 $1,502.00 00686692 H1805 VPM BRIDGES APTS 05/01/2023 $707.00 00686693 H3637 VPM MANAGEMENT 05/01/2023 $1,328.00 00686694 H3088 VPM SHER LANE, LP 05/01/2023 $2,497.00 00686695 H00065 HUNG TRONG VU 05/01/2023 $1,690.00 00686696 H00146 LONG DUC VU 05/01/2023 $768.00 00686697 H2900 DANNY VU 05/01/2023 $1,644.00 00686698 H00359 JIA PEIR WANG 05/01/2023 $1,548.00 00686699 H0719 NEIL E WEST 05/01/2023 $1,372.00 00686700 H00376 WHISPERING FOUNTAINS AT LAGUNA WOODS 05/01/2023 $992.00 00686701 H1934 WINDSOR-DAWSON, LP 05/01/2023 $4,743.00 00686702 H3429 WINDWOOD KNOLL APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $4,029.00 00686703 H00118 WOODBRIDGE APARTMENTS 05/01/2023 $1,969.00 00686704 H3506 WOODBURY SQUARE 05/01/2023 $1,748.00 EFT: 1,039 $3,325,883.34
Check: 211 $500,415.65
Total: 1,250 $3,826,298.99
Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 150 of 448 ends

City of Garden Grove
Certificate of Warrants
Register Dates:
05/03/2023

This is to certify the demands covered by EFT numbers 00037018 through 00037047 and check numbers 00686705 through 00686789 inclusive as listed on this register and have been verified by the Finance Division as properly issued and bear all proper signatures.

Note: Warrant 00686788 has been voided

Finance Director
Patricia Song

Page 151 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 2, 2023 and May 3, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:54:39 AM Page 1
AP - Checking Account
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00037018 V03075 A3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 05/03/2023 $44,953.74 00037019 V00093 ABSOLUTE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 05/03/2023 $111.38 00037020 V00422 ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC 05/03/2023 $152.01 00037021 V00657 CALIF FORENSIC PHLEBOTOMY, INC 05/03/2023 $1,763.36 00037022 V00175 CALIFORNIA YELLOW CAB 05/03/2023 $8,682.50 00037023 V00224 CDW-GOVERNMENT, INC 05/03/2023 $277.58 00037024 V02708 CHC: CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES 05/03/2023 $45.00 00037025 V00672 CRON & ASSOCIATES TRANSCRIPTION, INC 05/03/2023 $3,178.28 00037026 V00259 DTNTECH MARKETING 05/03/2023 $1,565.50 00037027 V01305 FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC 05/03/2023 $450.00 00037028 V00103 GARDEN GROVE AUTOMOTIVE 05/03/2023 $2,000.00 00037029 OTV000879 GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION 05/03/2023 $17,595.83 00037030 V02707 GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION PAC 05/03/2023 $3,590.00 00037031 V00218 GRAINGER 05/03/2023 $666.98 00037032 V00092 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP AND CHEVROLET OF

WATSONV
05/03/2023 $55,223.48
00037033 V03068 NEXUS HOLDING LLC 05/03/2023 $986.30 00037034 V02706 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION 05/03/2023 $3,311.67 00037035 V00136 ORANGE COUNTY WELDING, INC 05/03/2023 $7,920.00 00037036 V00425 PETDATA 05/03/2023 $2,378.00 00037037 V00222 SCP DISTRIBUTORS, LLC 05/03/2023 $758.32 00037038 V01775 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 05/03/2023 $5,164.14 00037039 V00250 SIMPSON CHEVROLET OF GG 05/03/2023 $39.15 00037040 V03136 SUNRISE MULTISPECIALIST MEDICAL CENTER 05/03/2023 $915.00 00037041 V00228 SUPERION, LLC 05/03/2023 $2,843.75 00037042 V01458 TOYOTA OF GARDEN GROVE 05/03/2023 $7,500.00 00037043 V00826 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC 05/03/2023 $30,124.25 00037044 V00341 ALLISON ASH-BURKE 05/03/2023 $1,400.00 00037045 V03009 FAGO, TRAVIS 05/03/2023 $1,225.00 00037046 V03169 WILFREDO COMBE LEON PRADO 05/03/2023 $1,500.00 00037047 V02089 SHANNON WAINWRIGHT 05/03/2023 $553.85 00686705 V00605 AARDVARK 05/03/2023 $2,786.82 00686706 V01122 ADVANCED CAR CARE, INC 05/03/2023 $3,194.51 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 152 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 2, 2023 and May 3, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:54:39 AM Page 2
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686707 V00573 ALAN'S LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER, INC 05/03/2023 $2,895.83 00686708 V01113 AMERICAN RED CROSS HEALTH & SAFETY SERVICES 05/03/2023 $1,836.00 00686709 V00641 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO 05/03/2023 $41,473.48 00686710 V00033 AT&T CORP 05/03/2023 $11,955.39 00686711 V00145 AUTONATION FORD TUSTIN 05/03/2023 $482.52 00686712 OTV002747 BOBERG ENGINEERING 05/03/2023 $1,824.20 00686713 V01494 C G LANDSCAPE, INC 05/03/2023 $1,573.00 00686714 V00655 C WELLS PIPELINE MATERIALS, INC 05/03/2023 $22,735.47 00686715 V00176 CALIBER BODYWORKS, INC 05/03/2023 $8,222.76 00686716 V02960 CAMDEN TRADESHOW AND EVENT FURNISHING, LLC 05/03/2023 $3,426.25 00686717 V00660 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 05/03/2023 $390.98 00686718 OTV002727 MARIELLA CAMPOS 05/03/2023 $40.00 00686719 OTV002658 MINH CAO 05/03/2023 $1,000.00 00686720 V03125 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS, INC 05/03/2023 $18,296.80 00686721 V00638 CITY OF ANAHEIM 05/03/2023 $583.33 00686722 V00832 CITY OF WESTMINSTER 05/03/2023 $600.00 00686723 V00579 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 05/03/2023 $725.12 00686724 V01151 COUNTY OF ORANGE DA'S OFFICE, ASSET FORFEITURE 05/03/2023 $100,024.00 00686725 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 05/03/2023 $63,599.90 00686726 OTV001891 FRANCIS CRUZ 05/03/2023 $327.50 00686727 V00978 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC, INC 05/03/2023 $9,267.88 00686728 OTV002750 LANG DANG 05/03/2023 $1,000.00 00686729 V00537 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 05/03/2023 $1,591.13 00686730 V00481 DATA TICKET, INC 05/03/2023 $683.18 00686731 V02871 DBS ADMINISTRATORS, INC. 05/03/2023 $7,038.61 00686732 V00174 ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA, INC
05/03/2023 $160.00
00686733 OTV002389 CURT ENSIGN 05/03/2023 $1,000.00 00686734 V00233 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO BIN 139107 05/03/2023 $2,059.65 00686735 V01196 FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 05/03/2023 $402.54 00686736 V00412 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 05/03/2023 $16.50 00686737 V02053 FIELDMAN,ROLAPP & ASSC., INC 05/03/2023 $3,075.00 00686738 V00502 FIREMASTER 05/03/2023 $217.72 00686739 V01379 FIVESTAR RUBBER STAMP ETC, INC 05/03/2023 $42.25 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 153 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 2, 2023 and May 3, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 10:54:39 AM Page 3
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686740 V01207 FLEET SERVICES, INC 05/03/2023 $187.44 00686741 V02257 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 05/03/2023 $1,167.70 00686742 V00686 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 05/03/2023 $1,291.65 00686743 V00054 GALLS LLC 05/03/2023 $3,856.07 00686744 V01382 GARDEN GROVE NISSAN, LP 05/03/2023 $3,500.00 00686745 V00097 GOLDENWEST LAWNMOWERS & SCOOTERS 05/03/2023 $130.44 00686746 V02034 ICC OEC 05/03/2023 $25.00 00686747 V00135 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY, INC 05/03/2023 $1,391.08 00686748 V00297 KNOTT'S BERRY FARM 05/03/2023 $3,550.00 00686749 V01411 MAGNUM OIL SPREADING, INC 05/03/2023 $2,192.41 00686750 V00617 MEMA 05/03/2023 $275.00 00686751 V00270 MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 05/03/2023 $9,405.57 00686752 H2386 MARY NGO 05/03/2023 $5,848.00 00686753 OTV002749 JAMIE NGUYEN 05/03/2023 $1,000.00 00686754 V00459 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 05/03/2023 $1,239.35 00686755 V00209 WHJ OCN,IND 05/03/2023 $350.00 00686756 V00371 OFFICE DEPOT, INC 05/03/2023 $3,706.69 00686757 OTV002748 JESSICA OLDENKAMP 05/03/2023 $307.00 00686758 V01422 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER'S OFFICE 05/03/2023 $150.00 00686759 V00756 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC 05/03/2023 $3,483.05 00686760 V01031 PL HAWN COMPANY, INC AIR FILTRATION & POLLUTION CO
05/03/2023 $2,469.74
00686761 V00770 PROACTIVE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC 05/03/2023 $2,100.00 00686762 V00070 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING, LLC 05/03/2023 $145.06 00686763 H4353 RAYMOND AND LYNN RUAIS 05/03/2023 $697.00 00686764 V01432 RAYMOND HANDLING SOLUTIONS, INC 05/03/2023 $108.00 00686765 V00774 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 05/03/2023 $33.35 00686766 V01157 SAF-T-FLO WATER SERVICES 05/03/2023 $1,430.35 00686767 V00784 SHOETERIA 05/03/2023 $1,188.29 00686768 OTV002751 KEVIN SMITH 05/03/2023 $1,000.00 00686769 V01442 SOCIALWISE CONSULTING, LLC 05/03/2023 $5,375.00 00686770 V00793 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO ML 711D 05/03/2023 $575.00 00686771 V01784 SOUTHLAND MEDICAL, LLC 05/03/2023 $324.48 00686772 V00795 SPARKLETTS 05/03/2023 $188.88 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 154 of 448 ends

Page 155 of 448 ends

City of Garden Grove
Certificate of Warrants
Register Dates:
5/10/2023

This is to certify the demands covered by EFT numbers 00037048 through 00037074, and check numbers 00686790 through 00686961 inclusive as listed on this register and have been verified by the Fi nance Di vision as properly
issued and bear all proper signatures.

Finance Director
Patricia Song

Page 156 of 448 ends

~ _b _' -

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 4, 2023 and May 10, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 10, 2023 4:57:36 PM Page 1
AP - Checking Account
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00037048 V01479 AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC 05/10/2023 $3,922.43 00037049 V02922 AMERICAN WATER COLLEGE, LLC 05/10/2023 $249.00 00037050 V00657 CALIF FORENSIC PHLEBOTOMY, INC 05/10/2023 $2,534.83 00037051 V01042 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO, INC 05/10/2023 $2,859.46 00037052 V00456 CIVOS, INC 05/10/2023 $25,000.00 00037053 V00562 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES,INC 05/10/2023 $5,701.59 00037054 V00259 DTNTECH MARKETING 05/10/2023 $1,200.61 00037055 V03018 FLO-SERVICES, INC. 05/10/2023 $7,000.60 00037056 V00218 GRAINGER 05/10/2023 $3,047.25 00037057 V01779 GREENFIELDS OUTDOOR FITNESS 05/10/2023 $68,428.68 00037058 V00243 INDOFF, INC 05/10/2023 $3,795.46 00037059 V01391 INTELEPEER CLOUD COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 05/10/2023 $2,246.54 00037060 V02883 INC. MOTION & FLOW CONTROL PRODUCTS 05/10/2023 $61.19 00037061 V00082 NFINIT 05/10/2023 $115.49 00037062 V00747 OCEAN BLUE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC 05/10/2023 $939.49 00037063 V00210 PEST OPTIONS, INC 05/10/2023 $1,905.00 00037064 V02733 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES 05/10/2023 $1,732.67 00037065 V00506 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC 05/10/2023 $32,986.80 00037066 V00615 STRAY CAT ALLIANCE 05/10/2023 $6,275.88 00037067 V03136 SUNRISE MULTISPECIALIST MEDICAL CENTER 05/10/2023 $2,590.00 00037068 V00591 U S ARMOR CORP 05/10/2023 $2,153.91 00037069 V02803 VALLEY MAINTENANCE CORP. 05/10/2023 $11,846.00 00037070 V00817 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS, INC 05/10/2023 $798.59 00037071 V00035 VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY 05/10/2023 $2,579.55 00037072 V00828 WEST COAST SAND & GRAVEL 05/10/2023 $712.85 00037073 V03144 BRAZILIA ALTERATIONS 05/10/2023 $553.00 00037074 V00288 EMMA S CLARK 05/10/2023 $425.00 00686790 V00629 A-1 FENCE COMPANY 05/10/2023 $1,151.00 00686791 V00573 ALAN'S LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER, INC 05/10/2023 $256.05 00686792 V00635 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC 05/10/2023 $13,383.75 00686793 V01324 ALLIED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC 05/10/2023 $14,320.00 00686794 OTV002044 RAMONA ROSEANNE ALVAREZ 05/10/2023 $89.00 00686795 V00640 ANGELUS QUARRIES, INC 05/10/2023 $60.68 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 157 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 4, 2023 and May 10, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 10, 2023 4:57:36 PM Page 2
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686796 OTV002706 STEPHANIE MARIA ARANDA 05/10/2023 $33.00 00686797 OTV002777 REYES ARELLANO 05/10/2023 $50.61 00686798 OTV002200 ZHANNA ARUTYUNOVA 05/10/2023 $13.00 00686799 V00145 AUTONATION FORD TUSTIN 05/10/2023 $375.36 00686800 OTV002581 FARZANA BANIKZAI 05/10/2023 $11.00 00686801 V00645 BARR AND CLARK, INC 05/10/2023 $1,025.00 00686802 V00644 BC WIRE ROPE & RIGGING 05/10/2023 $2,109.18 00686803 V00429 BEE REMOVERS 05/10/2023 $145.00 00686804 OTV002752 JANNA BRADLEY 05/10/2023 $2,500.00 00686805 V00649 BROWNELLS, INC 05/10/2023 $556.42 00686806 V01038 BRUCE HALL LAND SURVEYOR, INC 05/10/2023 $6,400.00 00686807 V02670 MYAH CHERIE BRUNSWICK 05/10/2023 $21.00 00686808 OTV001837 PHUONG BUI 05/10/2023 $105.00 00686809 V00561 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 05/10/2023 $2,820.00 00686810 V00660 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 05/10/2023 $26.00 00686811 OTV002769 CANTOR GROUP II C/O VIERERGRUPPE MGMT 05/10/2023 $1,532.11 00686812 OTV002582 MARICELA CARDENAS-CORDOVA 05/10/2023 $134.00 00686813 V00554 CARL WARREN & CO 05/10/2023 $1,350.00 00686814 OTV002405 CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CASEY 05/10/2023 $117.00 00686815 OTV002772 PATRICIA CASTILLO 05/10/2023 $13.18 00686816 V01059 CHEMEX INDUSTRIES 05/10/2023 $927.11 00686817 OTV002702 DESIREE MONIQUE CISNEROS 05/10/2023 $41.00 00686818 OTV002773 RACHELE CONCEPTION 05/10/2023 $13.95 00686819 V00667 CONTINENTAL CONCRETE CUTTING 05/10/2023 $5,720.00 00686820 V00620 COUNTY OF ORANGE 05/10/2023 $437.97 00686821 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 05/10/2023 $58,712.00 00686822 V02819 D.S. CUSTOM LINENS, INC. 05/10/2023 $8.86 00686823 OTV002753 DAISY NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. 05/10/2023 $2,221.66 00686824 OTV002784 IAN DALMACIO 05/10/2023 $1.35 00686825 OTV002767 LONG DANG 05/10/2023 $8.54 00686826 V00481 DATA TICKET, INC 05/10/2023 $448.00 00686827 V02600 DAVE BANG ASSOCIATES INC OF CA 05/10/2023 $2,954.66 00686828 OTV002255 ELIZABETH ASCENCION DE LA CRUZ 05/10/2023 $133.00 00686829 V00184 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 05/10/2023 $1,035.14 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 158 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 4, 2023 and May 10, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 10, 2023 4:57:36 PM Page 3
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686830 V02200 DIANA LING CHEN 05/10/2023 $9.00 00686831 V01089 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORP 05/10/2023 $2,452.58 00686832 OTV002768 THI DUONG 05/10/2023 $14.30 00686833 V00233 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO BIN 139107 05/10/2023 $136.78 00686834 V02204 FAMILIES FORWARD, INC. 05/10/2023 $6,836.24 00686835 V00412 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 05/10/2023 $59.05 00686836 V00276 FG SOLUTIONS, LLC 05/10/2023 $9,061.04 00686837 OTV002758 JOSEPHINE L FISH 05/10/2023 $164.73 00686838 V01207 FLEET SERVICES, INC 05/10/2023 $247.28 00686839 OTV002775 TERRI FORD 05/10/2023 $17.03 00686840 V00009 FORENSIC NURSE SPECIALISTS, INC 05/10/2023 $1,800.00 00686841 V00143 FRYE SIGN CO 05/10/2023 $193.95 00686842 V00054 GALLS LLC 05/10/2023 $179.32 00686843 V00696 GARDEN GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST 05/10/2023 $596.15 00686844 OTV002404 BRYAN D GILMORE 05/10/2023 $89.00 00686845 V00588 GMS AUTOGLASS 05/10/2023 $516.52 00686846 V01746 GMU GEOTECHNICAL, INC 05/10/2023 $11,658.50 00686847 OTV002585 EZRA JOSIAH GOMEZ 05/10/2023 $31.00 00686848 OTV002705 RODOLFO GOMEZ 05/10/2023 $16.00 00686849 OTV002506 IESHA LINETTE GONZALEZ SALAZAR 05/10/2023 $16.00 00686850 OTV002762 GRACES HOME CARE 05/10/2023 $750.57 00686851 OTV002764 GRISWOLD LAW APC 05/10/2023 $70.94 00686852 V00706 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 05/10/2023 $6,166.07 00686853 OTV001961 PAUL ST JOHN HARDIE 05/10/2023 $93.00 00686854 OTV002004 ROBERT JAMES HARVEY 05/10/2023 $122.00 00686855 V00602 HDL COREN & CONE 05/10/2023 $6,041.25 00686856 OTV002201 BRIAN ANTHONY HILDBRAND SR 05/10/2023 $26.00 00686857 V00711 HILL'S BROS LOCK & SAFE, INC 05/10/2023 $194.55 00686858 V00712 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 05/10/2023 $2,250.00 00686859 OTV002652 ALAN HO 05/10/2023 $36.00 00686860 OTV002507 THOMAS JEFFREY HURST 05/10/2023 $91.00 00686861 V01060 IAPMO 05/10/2023 $325.00 00686862 V00135 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY, INC 05/10/2023 $1,198.49 00686863 V00717 J & M SERVICE, INC 05/10/2023 $125.01 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 159 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 4, 2023 and May 10, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 10, 2023 4:57:36 PM Page 4
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686864 V00719 JAY'S CATERING 05/10/2023 $402.36 00686865 V00071 JM NURSERY 05/10/2023 $348.00 00686866 OTV001154 JOHN PAUL ZEMPOALTECA 05/10/2023 $45.00 00686867 V00724 KLEINFELDER WEST,INC 05/10/2023 $1,763.00 00686868 OTV002785 GREG KOSEK 05/10/2023 $74.00 00686869 V00435 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 05/10/2023 $120.32 00686870 OTV002584 BETHANY RACHEL LARSON 05/10/2023 $32.00 00686871 V00728 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 05/10/2023 $985.39 00686872 OTV002776 KEVIN LE 05/10/2023 $54.32 00686873 OTV001999 ANH THI LE 05/10/2023 $29.00 00686874 OTV002783 LAN THITUYET LE 05/10/2023 $58.85 00686875 OTV002786 LONG V. LE 05/10/2023 $520.00 00686876 V02341 THAIHIEN DINHPHUONG LE 05/10/2023 $55.00 00686877 OTV002771 TAK MING LEUNG 05/10/2023 $3.38 00686878 V00402 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS ACCOUNT #1008503 05/10/2023 $495.00 00686879 V01563 LIFE-ASSIST, INC 05/10/2023 $194.01 00686880 V01411 MAGNUM OIL SPREADING, INC 05/10/2023 $424.78 00686881 OTV002327 SUN YEONG MOON 05/10/2023 $17.00 00686882 OTV002782 VERA MORGAN 05/10/2023 $22.08 00686883 OTV002703 HOI GIA NGO 05/10/2023 $154.00 00686884 V02035 JULIE NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $119.00 00686885 OTV002701 KHANH HONG NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $53.00 00686886 OTV002781 MINH-HUNG NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $43.38 00686887 OTV002656 PHUONG TUYET NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $177.00 00686888 OTV002756 STEVEN NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $1,078.90 00686889 OTV002505 THUY NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $12.00 00686890 OTV002043 LYNDA OAKLEY-HARE 05/10/2023 $30.00 00686891 V00209 WHJ OCN,IND 05/10/2023 $1,095.00 00686892 V01424 PACIFIC COAST ENTERTAINMENT 05/10/2023 $420.00 00686893 V00164 PACIFIC MEDICAL CLINIC 05/10/2023 $30.00 00686894 OTV002757 PACIFIC WEST COMMUNITIES 05/10/2023 $10,000.00 00686895 V00756 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC 05/10/2023 $1,957.56 00686896 V00598 PARKWOOD LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC 05/10/2023 $13,552.25 00686897 OTV002704 RICHARD ARMANDO PEREZ 05/10/2023 $112.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 160 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 4, 2023 and May 10, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 10, 2023 4:57:36 PM Page 5
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686898 V00761 PETTY CASH - MUN SRVC CTR 05/10/2023 $701.23 00686899 V00762 PETTY CASH-SPEC INVESTIGATIONS 05/10/2023 $8,479.00 00686900 OTV002761 ROBERT P POITRAS 05/10/2023 $63.20 00686901 OTV002766 ZINA QUIGLEY 05/10/2023 $239.51 00686902 OTV002654 MARIELA Y DIAZ RAMIREZ 05/10/2023 $46.00 00686903 OTV002252 RAMONA MARIE RAMOS 05/10/2023 $34.00 00686904 OTV000693 CASSANDRA MARIE RAZO 05/10/2023 $70.00 00686905 OTV001898 PATRICIA PENA RODRIGUEZ 05/10/2023 $70.00 00686906 OTV001839 EDGAR ROMAN 05/10/2023 $43.00 00686907 OTV002699 JASMIN ROSE ROMERO 05/10/2023 $235.00 00686908 OTV002406 DAVID DONALD ROOTEN 05/10/2023 $120.00 00686909 OTV001153 ROSA NGUYEN 05/10/2023 $16.00 00686910 V02990 GLENN ROSS 05/10/2023 $137.50 00686911 OTV002755 RHEA SOMER RUSTAN 05/10/2023 $129.00 00686912 V00525 RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP 05/10/2023 $165.88 00686913 OTV002698 ALEXUS FAITH SALDATE 05/10/2023 $95.00 00686914 V02926 SCA OF CA, LLC 05/10/2023 $119,641.23 00686915 OTV002481 MICHAL ALFRED SCOTT JR 05/10/2023 $89.00 00686916 OTV002655 MELINDA KAY SEAMAN 05/10/2023 $36.00 00686917 V01612 SENFTEN INC 05/10/2023 $700.00 00686918 OTV002780 GRACE SHIM 05/10/2023 $25.49 00686919 V00784 SHOETERIA 05/10/2023 $240.00 00686920 OTV002770 CHERYL SHULTS 05/10/2023 $71.24 00686921 V00003 SIGNARAMA 05/10/2023 $765.00 00686922 V01434 SIMON PETTROW 05/10/2023 $1,991.22 00686923 V00225 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY HLDING 05/10/2023 $1,110.83 00686924 V00788 SOUTH COAST AQMD 05/10/2023 $153.23 00686925 V00788 SOUTH COAST AQMD 05/10/2023 $153.23 00686926 V00367 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 05/10/2023 $649.05 00686927 V00474 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS, LLC 05/10/2023 $1,257.20 00686928 V00795 SPARKLETTS 05/10/2023 $57.60 00686929 V00799 SUN BADGE COMPANY 05/10/2023 $140.14 00686930 OTV002477 FRANK DELANO SWIFT 05/10/2023 $64.00 00686931 V01389 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 05/10/2023 $529.22 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 161 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 4, 2023 and May 10, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 10, 2023 4:57:36 PM Page 6
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686932 V00200 THE OLSON COMPANY 05/10/2023 $972.00 00686933 V00212 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 05/10/2023 $601.20 00686934 OTV001857 JENNIFER D. TILZER 05/10/2023 $20.00 00686935 OTV002746 ANTHONY TON 05/10/2023 $14.30 00686936 OTV002760 BICHHUYEN TONG 05/10/2023 $13.32 00686937 OTV002480 SALLY TORRES 05/10/2023 $45.00 00686938 OTV002778 VINCENT TRAN 05/10/2023 $58.54 00686939 OTV001694 DUNG KIM TRAN 05/10/2023 $102.00 00686940 OTV002779 HAO TRAN 05/10/2023 $36.51 00686941 OTV001743 NIKKI TRAN 05/10/2023 $78.00 00686942 OTV002774 TAI TRAN 05/10/2023 $55.70 00686943 OTV002763 DAVID TREICHLER 05/10/2023 $14.51 00686944 V02019 MY-NGOC THI TRINH 05/10/2023 $13.00 00686945 OTV001918 KHAI DUC TU 05/10/2023 $16.00 00686946 OTV002754 LYNN HUE TRUONG TU 05/10/2023 $22.00 00686947 V01975 DOMINGA TURNER 05/10/2023 $39.00 00686948 V03138 U.S. NATIONAL CORP 05/10/2023 $39,000.00 00686949 V00811 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
05/10/2023 $653.22
00686950 V00814 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 05/10/2023 $16.93 00686951 V01948 RENEE LYNN VICTOR 05/10/2023 $31.00 00686952 OTV002700 RUBEN VILLA 05/10/2023 $42.00 00686953 OTV002736 HUE VAN VO 05/10/2023 $20.83 00686954 OTV002759 TRUNG M VO 05/10/2023 $48.20 00686955 OTV002407 DEASIRAY ERICA WADE 05/10/2023 $125.00 00686956 OTV001921 KIMBERLY WEST 05/10/2023 $7.00 00686957 V01044 WESTERN WATER WORKS 05/10/2023 $3,730.13 00686958 OTV002765 JOSEPH WITT 05/10/2023 $20.46 00686959 V00112 WM OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 05/10/2023 $442.00 00686960 V00582 WOODRUFF & SMART, A PROFESSIONAL CORP 05/10/2023 $1,774.74 00686961 V01208 YO-FIRE SUPPLIES 05/10/2023 $1,130.28 EFT: 27 $191,661.87
Check: 172 $394,783.38
Total: 199 $586,445.25
Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: evar

Page 162 of 448 ends

City of Garden Grove
Certificate of Warrants
Register Dates:
05/17/2023

This is to certify the demands covered by Wire number 00001604, EFT numbers 00037075 through 00037111, and check numbers 00686962 through 00687063 inclusive as listed on this register and have been verified by the Finance Division as properly issued and bear all proper signatures.

Note: Warrant 687032 has been voided

Finance Director
Patricia Song

Page 163 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 11, 2023 and May 17, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 2:21:15 PM Page 1
AP - Checking Account
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00001604 V00792 SO CALIF GAS CO 05/17/2023 $1,378.80 00037075 V00133 2-1-1 ORANGE COUNTY 05/17/2023 $2,560.50 00037076 V02878 ADMIRAL PEST CONTROL, INC. 05/17/2023 $654.00 00037077 V00422 ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC 05/17/2023 $325.39 00037078 V00430 CANNON CORPORATION 05/17/2023 $1,998.00 00037079 V01042 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO, INC 05/17/2023 $2,838.75 00037080 V02708 CHC: CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES 05/17/2023 $45.00 00037081 V01036 CITIBANK %CITIGROUP 05/17/2023 $15,513.25 00037082 V00281 DAVIS FARR, LLP 05/17/2023 $25,435.00 00037083 V00259 DTNTECH MARKETING 05/17/2023 $437.18 00037084 V00679 ENTERPRISE FLEET MGMT, INC 05/17/2023 $4,623.80 00037085 V01305 FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC 05/17/2023 $1,647.20 00037086 OTV000879 GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION 05/17/2023 $17,595.83 00037087 V02707 GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION PAC 05/17/2023 $3,590.00 00037088 V00218 GRAINGER 05/17/2023 $4,875.07 00037089 V00223 ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 05/17/2023 $23.92 00037090 V00716 INTERVAL HOUSE 05/17/2023 $22,312.39 00037091 V01286 JTB SUPPLY CO, INC 05/17/2023 $5,296.13 00037092 V03000 LANCE, SOLL & LUNGHARD LLP 05/17/2023 $220.00 00037093 V02861 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS, INC. 05/17/2023 $521.64 00037094 V02752 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 05/17/2023 $26,740.00 00037095 V02866 MIND OC 05/17/2023 $74,675.76 00037096 V00092 NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP AND CHEVROLET OF

WATSONV
05/17/2023 $46,433.15
00037097 V02706 ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION 05/17/2023 $3,347.67 00037098 V02946 PAT WEST LLC 05/17/2023 $2,750.00 00037099 V02870 PLACEWORKS, INC. 05/17/2023 $468.78 00037100 V03020 PROJECT FINANCE ADVISORY LIMITED 05/17/2023 $82,913.68 00037101 V00401 REPUBLIC WASTE SERVICES OF SO CALIFORNIA, LLC 05/17/2023 $584,282.04 00037102 V00222 SCP DISTRIBUTORS, LLC 05/17/2023 $262.64 00037103 V02950 SHELTER PROVIDERS OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC 05/17/2023 $1,437.50 00037104 V03136 SUNRISE MULTISPECIALIST MEDICAL CENTER 05/17/2023 $1,197.00 00037105 V03085 T.E. ROBERTS INC. 05/17/2023 $379,054.42 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 164 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 11, 2023 and May 17, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 2:21:15 PM Page 2
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00037106 V02539 THE SOLIS GROUP 05/17/2023 $222.00 00037107 V00817 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS, INC 05/17/2023 $94.20 00037108 V00104 WALLACE & ASSOCIATES 05/17/2023 $18,992.00 00037109 V01469 WEST YOST ASSOCIATES, INC. 05/17/2023 $26,932.17 00037110 V03009 FAGO, TRAVIS 05/17/2023 $600.00 00037111 V02089 SHANNON WAINWRIGHT 05/17/2023 $553.85 00686962 V00029 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC 05/17/2023 $3,061.31 00686963 V01500 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP 05/17/2023 $993.98 00686964 V01697 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC 05/17/2023 $718.50 00686965 V01502 AGRI-TURF DISTRIBUTING 05/17/2023 $71.42 00686966 V00635 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC 05/17/2023 $13,319.55 00686967 V00507 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH, INC 05/17/2023 $79,530.28 00686968 V00639 ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY DEV 05/17/2023 $1,050.00 00686969 V02328 APPLEONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 05/17/2023 $656.37 00686970 V00641 AQUA-METRIC SALES CO 05/17/2023 $29,174.74 00686971 V00599 ARROW TOOLS FASTENERS & SAW, INC 05/17/2023 $110.10 00686972 V00391 AUTOZONE STORES, INC 05/17/2023 $2,543.71 00686973 V00645 BARR AND CLARK, INC 05/17/2023 $1,595.00 00686974 V00150 BILL'S SOUND & SECURITY 05/17/2023 $9,897.00 00686975 V01512 BROCO, INC 05/17/2023 $1,185.25 00686976 OTV002792 KAREN BUI 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00686977 OTV002791 BUILDPRO 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00686978 V00561 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 05/17/2023 $2,750.00 00686979 V00561 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 05/17/2023 $70.00 00686980 OTV002658 MINH CAO 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00686981 V00554 CARL WARREN & CO 05/17/2023 $6,359.00 00686982 V00076 CELLEBRITE USA, INC 05/17/2023 $5,307.00 00686983 V01059 CHEMEX INDUSTRIES 05/17/2023 $2,891.76 00686984 V00664 CIVILTEC ENGINEERING, INC 05/17/2023 $360.00 00686985 V00579 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 05/17/2023 $677.32 00686986 V02224 COLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME, INC. 05/17/2023 $6,713.01 00686987 V00546 COMMUNITY SENIORSERV 05/17/2023 $5,000.00 00686988 V00667 CONTINENTAL CONCRETE CUTTING, INC. 05/17/2023 $1,542.00 00686989 V01134 COUNTY OF ORANGE TREAS REV RECOVERY-A/R UNIT 05/17/2023 $33,102.00 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 165 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 11, 2023 and May 17, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 2:21:15 PM Page 3
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00686990 V02871 DBS ADMINISTRATORS, INC. 05/17/2023 $7,038.61 00686991 V03026 ENCORE GROUP (USA) LLC 05/17/2023 $14,441.18 00686992 OTV002793 SANDRA ESTRADA 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00686993 V00682 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, INC 05/17/2023 $118.62 00686994 V00336 EXCLUSIVE AUTO DETAIL 05/17/2023 $918.00 00686995 V00684 EXPERIAN INFO SOLUTIONS, INC 05/17/2023 $78.00 00686996 V00233 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO BIN 139107 05/17/2023 $295.60 00686997 V00623 FAIR HOUSING FOUNDATION 05/17/2023 $5,755.04 00686998 V00829 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 1350 05/17/2023 $1,822.80 00686999 V00502 FIREMASTER 05/17/2023 $613.13 00687000 V01379 FIVESTAR RUBBER STAMP ETC, INC 05/17/2023 $162.25 00687001 V02257 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 05/17/2023 $686.51 00687002 V00054 GALLS LLC 05/17/2023 $717.74 00687003 V01055 GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOC RETIREE MEDICAL TRUST
05/17/2023 $46,138.00
00687004 OTV002204 AIMEE GURNEA 05/17/2023 $160.00 00687005 OTV002789 ADRIANA GUTIERREZ 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00687006 V02116 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC. 05/17/2023 $28,236.59 00687007 V02182 HARMONY LAB & SAFETY SUPPLIES 05/17/2023 $150.88 00687008 V00503 HF&H CONSULTANTS, LLC 05/17/2023 $10,523.90 00687009 V00711 HILL'S BROS LOCK & SAFE, INC 05/17/2023 $3,202.84 00687010 V02308 HIRSCH PIPE & SUPPLY CO. INC 05/17/2023 $998.24 00687011 OTV002794 XUAN HOANG 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00687012 V00531 IRV SEAVER MOTORCYCLES 05/17/2023 $658.63 00687013 V00720 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 05/17/2023 $368.43 00687014 V03172 JRBADGES, LLC 05/17/2023 $1,303.13 00687015 V01750 KELLY ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENTGROUP, LLC 05/17/2023 $550.00 00687016 V00725 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC 05/17/2023 $713.62 00687017 V00435 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 05/17/2023 $111.86 00687018 V00769 LEGAL SHIELD 05/17/2023 $650.75 00687019 V00610 LT PROPERTIES 05/17/2023 $19,458.55 00687020 V01411 MAGNUM OIL SPREADING, INC 05/17/2023 $781.04 00687021 OTV002787 MONICA MARTINEZ 05/17/2023 $210.00 00687022 V00206 MCCALL'S METER SALES & SERVICE 05/17/2023 $570.89 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 166 of 448 ends

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
GGFEFM001 Warrant Register
Check Dates Between May 11, 2023 and May 17, 2023
Bank(s): AP - Checking Account, WT - Checking Account
Report Generated on May 30, 2023 2:21:15 PM Page 4
Check Vendor # Vendor Name
Issue
Date
Check
Amount
00687023 V00020 MCFADDEN DALE INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE 05/17/2023 $73.92 00687024 V00737 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT, LLC 05/17/2023 $5,748.32 00687025 V00151 MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS 05/17/2023 $3,853.55 00687026 V01177 METROLINK TRAINS 05/17/2023 $777.00 00687027 V03178 DANNY MORENO 05/17/2023 $275.00 00687028 V01280 NATIONAL CREDIT REPORTING 05/17/2023 $111.60 00687029 OTV002790 BINH CONG NGUYEN 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00687030 OTV002788 TERRI NGUYEN 05/17/2023 $1,244.36 00687031 V00551 OC HOUSING AUTHORITY 05/17/2023 $6,000.00 00687033 V00530 ORANGE COUNTY APPLIANCE PARTS 05/17/2023 $85.44 00687034 V01422 ORANGE COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER'S OFFICE 05/17/2023 $100.00 00687035 V01649 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY 05/17/2023 $4,196.92 00687036 V01586 PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 05/17/2023 $11,313.54 00687037 OTV002693 HUYEN THI KHAI PHAM 05/17/2023 $196.14 00687038 V00744 R J NOBLE COMPANY 05/17/2023 $502,146.25 00687039 V02618 R3 CONSULTING GROUP 05/17/2023 $2,137.50 00687040 V00525 RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP 05/17/2023 $84.94 00687041 V00779 S C YAMAMOTO, INC 05/17/2023 $77.00 00687042 V00780 SAFETY 1st PEST CONTROL, INC 05/17/2023 $2,900.00 00687043 V02926 SCA OF CA, LLC 05/17/2023 $66,116.83 00687044 V00542 SCHORR METALS, INC 05/17/2023 $30.56 00687045 V00785 SHRED CONFIDENTIAL, INC 05/17/2023 $232.31 00687046 V00160 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL COMPANY 05/17/2023 $32,081.99 00687047 V00213 STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS 05/17/2023 $2,360.75 00687048 V00656 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL

RELATIONS
05/17/2023 $675.00
00687049 V01389 THE HOME DEPOT PRO 05/17/2023 $2,673.58 00687050 V02203 THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION 05/17/2023 $15,500.04 00687051 V00809 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS, INC 05/17/2023 $11,918.21 00687052 V00812 UNIFIRST CORP 05/17/2023 $1,235.82 00687053 V00814 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 05/17/2023 $392.74 00687054 OTV001847 GIANG S. VO 05/17/2023 $1,000.00 00687055 V00398 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY WESTERN DIVISION 05/17/2023 $44,343.20 00687056 V00527 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 05/17/2023 $1,070.07 Server Name: cognos.ggcity.org User Name: rmay

Page 167 of 448 ends

Page 168 of 448 ends

Agenda Item - 5.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Adoption of Resolutions
Confirming the Annual Levy
of Fiscal Year 2023-24
Assessments for the Garden
Grove Street Lighting
District, the Garden Grove
Street Lighting District No.
99-1, and the Garden Grove
Park Maintenance District.
(Action Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to hold public hearings prior to adoption of the Fiscal Year 2023- 24 assessments for: 1) the Garden Grove Street Lighting District, 2) the Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1, and 3) the Garden Grove Park Maintenance District.

BACKGROUND
On June 13, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 9798-23, 9796-23, 9794-23, 9792-23, 9790-23, 9795-23, 9793-23, 9791-23, and 9797-23 declaring its intention to levy and collect Fiscal Year 2023-24 assessments to pay for street lighting and park maintenance services.

DISCUSSION
The purpose of the public hearings are to hear testimony on the question of the annual assessments for parcels located within the Street Lighting District, Street Lighting District No. 99-1, and Park Maintenance District. The proposed assessments are based on rates and methodology as previously adopted in Fiscal Year 2022-23 by the City Council for the Garden Grove Street Lighting District and the Garden Grove Park Maintenance District. There will not be an increase in the assessments this fiscal year.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The adoption of street lighting and park maintenance assessments will raise

Page 169 of 448 ends

approximately $1,350,000 in street lighting revenues and $700,000 in park maintenance revenues. The assessments will be collected by the County.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. For the Garden Grove Street Lighting District:

Conduct the public hearing for the proposed annual levy of assessments; Receive the report of the City Clerk regarding protests received; and Assuming there is no majority protest, adopt the Resolution confirming the assessment in the Garden Grove Street Lighting District for FY 2023-24

2. For the Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1:

3. For the Garden Grove Park Maintenance District:

By: Alexa Viramontes, Sr. Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Public Hearing
Resolution for
Lighting Assessment
District
6/20/2023 Resolution Public_Hearing_Resolution_Lighting_6-27-

23.pdf
Public Hearing
Resolution for
Lighting Assessment
District 99-1
6/20/2023 Resolution Public_Hearing_Resolution_Lighting_99-1__6- 27-23.pdf
Public Hearing
Resolution for Park
Maintenance
Assessment District
6/20/2023 Resolution Public_Hearing_Resolution_Park_Maintenance_6- 27-23.pdf

Page 170 of 448 ends

• •
•
• • •
•
•
•

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR 2023-24 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN

GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove initiated proceedings to order the installation, maintenance, and servicing of certain public street lighting facilities in the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District (Resolution No. 9790-23 for FY 2023-24 under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code;
WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 13, 2023, the City Council considered and approved a report prepared by the City Engineer under and pursuant to the California Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, the report contained an estimate of the costs of improvements, a diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivisions of the land within the district, and a proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements in relation to special benefits that parcels receive from the improvements; WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 9796-23 fixed June 27, 2023, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, as the time and place for the Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has given notice of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 9796-23 and of the time and place and purpose of the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with the City Council an affidavit setting forth the time and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, at the time and place stated in the notice, the Public Hearing was opened by the City Council and the report was considered, and all persons appearing and desiring to be heard were heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has examined the evidence presented at the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, protests were not made by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for the improvements proposed; and WHEREAS, any and all protests and objections, written and oral, made or filed in the matter of the report or assessments have been overruled and denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

Page 171 of 448 ends

proceedings, and all matters relating thereto; and all protests, objections, or appeals have been heard and the same are hereby overruled and denied.

SECTION 2. Based upon its review of the report, and other reports and information presented to it, the City Council hereby finds and determines that: (i) the land within the District will be benefited by the improvements described in the report; (ii) the District includes all of the lands so benefited; (iii) the net amount to be assessed upon the lands within the District for FY 2023-24, in accordance with the report described above, is apportioned by a formula and method that fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements; and (iv) no assessment imposed on any parcel exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.

SECTION 3. The City Council finds that the assessment is in compliance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution and that the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment.

SECTION 4. The City Council hereby confirms the diagram and assessment for the District for FY 2023-24. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment against the lots and parcels of land in the District for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, as set forth in the report.

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made in accordance with the report and these proceedings.

SECTION 6. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to update the report and assessments to the most current available parcel listings as provided by the Orange County Auditor’s Office.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file and record the diagram and assessment, or a certified copy thereof, with the Orange County Auditor for collection of the assessment on the tax roll.

Page 172 of 448 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR 2023-24 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 99-1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove initiated proceedings to order the installation, maintenance, and servicing of certain public street lighting facilities in the City of Garden Grove Street Lighting District No. 99-1 (Resolution No. 9791-23 for FY 2023-24 under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code;
WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 13, 2023, the City Council considered and approved a report prepared by the City Engineer under and pursuant to the California Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, the report contained an estimate of the costs of improvements, a diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivisions of the land within the district, and a proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements in relation to special benefits that parcels receive from the improvements; WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 9797-23 fixed June 27, 2023, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, as the time and place for the Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has given notice of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 9797-23 and of the time and place and purpose of the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with the City Council an affidavit setting forth the time and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, at the time and place stated in the notice, the Public Hearing was opened by the City Council and the report was considered, and all persons appearing and desiring to be heard were heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has examined the evidence presented at the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, protests were not made by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for the improvements proposed; and WHEREAS, any and all protests and objections, written and oral, made or filed in the matter of the report or assessments have been overruled and denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

Page 173 of 448 ends

proceedings, and all matters relating thereto; and all protests, objections, or appeals have been heard and the same are hereby overruled and denied.

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made in accordance with the report and these proceedings.

SECTION 6. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to update the report and assessments to the most current available parcel listings as provided by the Orange County Auditor’s Office.

Page 174 of 448 ends

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE MAKING DETERMINATIONS FOR

THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE PARK MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR 2023-24 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove initiated proceedings to order the maintenance of public parks in the City of Garden Grove (Resolution No. 9792-23 for FY 2023-24 under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Part 2 (Sections 22500 et seq.) of the California Streets and Highways Code;
WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 13, 2023, the City Council considered and approved a report prepared by the City Engineer under and pursuant to the California Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, the report contained an estimate of the costs of improvements, a diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the subdivisions of the land within the district, and a proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements in relation to special benefits that parcels receive from the improvements; WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 9798-23 fixed June 27, 2023, at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, as the time and place for the Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has given notice of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 9798-23 and of the time and place and purpose of the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with the City Council an affidavit setting forth the time and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, at the time and place stated in the notice, the Public Hearing was opened by the City Council and the report was considered, and all persons appearing and desiring to be heard were heard; WHEREAS, the City Council has examined the evidence presented at the Public Hearing; WHEREAS, protests were not made by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for the improvements proposed; and WHEREAS, any and all protests and objections, written and oral, made or filed in the matter of the report or assessments have been overruled and denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1. The Public Hearing has been duly held, and notices thereof given as set forth in the recitals of this Resolution, and each and every step in the proceedings has been duly taken. The City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the report, including the assessment and diagram, the proceedings, and all matters relating thereto; and all protests, objections, or appeals have been heard and the same are hereby overruled and denied.

Page 175 of 448 ends

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made in accordance with the report and these proceedings.

SECTION 6. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to update the report and assessments to the most current available parcel listings as provided by the Orange County Auditor’s Office.

Page 176 of 448 ends

Agenda Item - 5.b.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution to
Confirm the Annual Levy of
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Assessment for the
Downtown Assessment
District. (Action Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to hold a public hearing and to adopt the Resolution to confirm Fiscal Year 2023-24 assessment for the Downtown Assessment District.

BACKGROUND
On June 13, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 9800-23, 9801-23, and 9799-23 which in general, described the proposed improvements, directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report, and stated the intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 2023-24, setting the public hearing date for June 27, 2023.

DISCUSSION
These proceedings and the notification regarding the levying of an annual assessment have been followed in accordance to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The remaining action for City Council is to hold the public hearing and, after conducting the hearing, adopt the proposed resolution to levy FY 2023-24 assessments for the Downtown Assessment District.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The City will collect $27,200 in assessment revenues for the Downtown Assessment District.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Conduct a public hearing for the proposed annual levy of assessments;

Page 177 of 448 ends

•
Receive the report of the City Clerk regarding protests received; and

Assuming there is no majority protest, adopt the Resolution confirming the proceedings and levying assessments against the induvial parcels in the Downtown Assessment District.

By: Alexa Viramontes, Sr. Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Public Hearing
Resolution for
Downtown Assessment
District
6/20/2023 Resolution Downtown_Public_Hearing_Resolution__6- 27-23.pdf

Page 178 of 448 ends

•
•

GARDEN GROVE CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND

CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS IN THE MATTER OF THE DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, the City Council has, by its Resolution No. 9799-23 declared its intention to order the maintenance of certain improvements and appurtenances within the Downtown Assessment District under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of the California Streets and Highways Code (herein “the Act”); WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 9800-23 the City Council has approved an Engineer’s Report under and pursuant to the Act and, in particular Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code; WHEREAS, the report contained among other things, an estimate of the cost of maintenance, a diagram showing the assessment district and boundaries and dimensions of the subdivisions of land within the assessment district (Attachment “A”), and a proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of maintenance upon several subdivisions of land in the assessment district in direct proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by the subdivisions respectively from the maintenance;
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 9801-23 the City Council fixed the date of June 27, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. (or as soon thereafter as the City Council may hear same) in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, California, as the time and place for the Public Hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed assessment;
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has given notice of the passage of the Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 9801-23 and of the time and place of purpose of the hearing, all as required by the Act; WHEREAS, the City Clerk has filed with the City Council its affidavit setting forth the time and manner of the compliance with the requirements of the Act for publishing of the notice; WHEREAS, at the time and place stated in the notice, a Public Hearing was conducted by the City Council at which hearing the report was duly presented and public testimony solicited and heard in the matter of the proposed assessment, and a full, fair, and complete hearing has been held and the City Council has been fully informed;
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and considered the assessment prepared in the report and proceedings prior thereto, and the evidence presented at the hearing; WHEREAS, protests were not made by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for the improvements proposed; and WHEREAS, any and all protests and objections, written and oral, made or filed in the matter of the report or assessments have been overruled and denied.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Garden Grove does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

Page 179 of 448 ends

SECTION 1. The Public Hearing has been duly held, and notice given as set forth in the recitals, and each and every step in the proceedings prior to and including the hearing has been duly and regularly taken. The City Council is satisfied with the correctness of the report, including the assessment and diagram, the proceedings, and all matters relating thereto; and all protests, objections, or appeals have been heard and the same are hereby overruled and denied. The City Council does hereby confirm the proceedings and the assessment.

SECTION 2. The City Council orders the proposed maintenance to be made in accordance with the report and these proceedings.

SECTION 3. The City Council does hereby determine that the amounts to be assessed against the individual parcels shown on the assessment diagram contained in the report are hereby approved and confirmed, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to endorse the fact and date of approval of the report.

SECTION 4. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an assessment for FY 2023-24 as set forth in the report.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file and record the diagram and assessment, as required by Section 22641 of the California Streets and Highways Code, with the County Auditor for collection of the assessment on the tax roll.

Page 180 of 448 ends

Agenda Item - 6.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: Teresa Pomeroy
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: City Clerk
Subject: Appointments to the Planning
Commission to fill two
vacancies. (Continued from the
June 13, 2023, meeting)
(Action Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For the Mayor, with City Council approval, to appoint commissioners to fill two vacancies on the Planning Commission.

BACKGROUND
At the March 14, 2023, City Council Meeting, Ms. Daisy Perez and Mr. Matthew Montano were appointed to the Planning Commission. However both Commissioners resigned soon after being appointed, and at the meeting held on May 9, 2023, the City Council accepted their resignations.

DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Municipal Code 2.21.013 and Government Code 54974(a), when an unscheduled vacancy occurs whether due to resignation, removal, or other cause, a special vacancy notice shall be posted and published in a local newspaper, within 20 days after the vacancy occurs.

A final appointment to the board, committee, or commission to fill the vacancy shall not be made for at least ten working days after posting of the notice. The attached vacancy notice was published and posted by the City Clerk's Office on Friday, May 12, 2023, and also attached is a list of applicants for consideration.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The appointment of commissioners on the Planning Commission does not have a financial impact to the City. The Commission Vacancy notice was advertised in the Orange County News, a locally adjudicated newspaper, at a publishing cost of $130.00. Legal advertising costs were included in the City's operating budget.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor, with City Council approval, appoint two Planning Commissioners to continue the terms for Ms. Daisy Perez and Mr. Matthew Montano.

Page 181 of 448 ends

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload
Date Type File Name
Legal Notice 6/5/2023 Backup
MaterialVacancy_Notice_(May_23)_Planning_Commission_Affidvit_of_Publication_OCN_GG_130937.pdf Updated
Planning
Commission
Applicant
List
6/19/2023 Backup
MaterialGarden_Grove_Planning_Commission_Applicants_List.pdf

Page 182 of 448 ends

Page 183 of 448 ends

AFFP
130937 Vacancy Notice Planning
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA}
COWHY OF ORANGE }
ss
I am a citizen of the United States; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principle clerk of the pc)nter of ORANGE COUNTY NEWS, a newspaper of general
circulation, published ONCE WEEKLY in the city of
GARDEN GROVE, County of ORANGE, which newspaper
has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of ORANGE, State of
California under the date of March 20, 1964. Case
l'Jumber A-31502; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspap er and not in any supplement thereof on the
following dates. to-wit:

May 12, 2023
That said nevvspaper was regularly issued and circulated on those dates .
s1m~Eo:

Orange County News--
Subscribed to and sworn by me this 12th day of May
2023.
00007270 00130937
75 LEGAi_

OCN-CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
P.O. BOX 3070
GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY NOTICE
Pursuant to Garden Grove Municipal Code Section 2.21.013, notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission has two unscheduled vacancies with the term expiring December 2024. Information and a Commission application can be obtained by accessing the City's website at: www.ggcity.org or by visiting the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 11222 Acacia Parkway, Garden Grove, California, or by calling (714) 741- 5o4o.

Commissioners are·non-compensated volunteers . The Planning Commission consists of seven members who are electors residing in Garden Grove. The current vacancies are to complete the term held by Commissioners Daisy Perez and Matthew Montano . Planning Commission meetings are regularly scheduled on the 1st and 3rd Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m., and are held in the Community Meeting Center, 11300 Stanford Avenue . Garden Grove, California. /s/ TERESA POMEROY, CMG
City Clerk
Date May 10, 2023
Publish:. May 12. 2023
Orange County News 5/12/2023-130937
Garden Grove Planning Commission Applicants

Aimee McAfee
Alejandra Colon
Andrew Nguyen
Calvin Van
Christian Jose Lopez
Dale Gilbert
Duy Nguyen
Fernando Cueva
James Webb
Joel Silverthorn
Linda Le
Linda Zamora
Minh-Tri Vu
Ngoc Tran
Ramiro Landeros
Reza Geramy
Roger Flanders
Roger Matsunaga
Tonya Martin
Vincent Arzaga
Joseph Laricchia

Page 184 of 448 ends

Agenda Item - 7.a.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: Craig Beck
Dept.: City Manager/Director Dept.: Community and Economic Development Department
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution
approving the Purchase and Sale
Agreement between the City of
Garden Grove and the Garden
Grove Housing Authority for real
property located at 11390-11400
Stanford Avenue. (Joint Action
Item with the Housing Authority.)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council and Housing Authority to consider approval of a Purchase and Sale Agreement between City of Garden Grove and the Garden Grove Housing Authority, for disposition of property located at 11390-11400 Stanford Avenue.

BACKGROUND
The City is the owner of real property located at the southwest corner of Stanford Avenue and Eighth Street (11390-11400 Stanford Avenue, Garden Grove, CA)(north portion of a larger assessor’s parcel APN No. 090-154-57)(the “Property”). An appraisal obtained by the City determined the highest and best use of the property is for multi-family residential development in accordance with the existing zoning and the properties fair market value of $8,550,000.

On June 13, 2023, the City Council Adopted Resolution No. 9788-23 declaring the Property to be “exempt surplus land”. Section 103(b)(3)(D) of the Surplus Land Act Guidelines issued by HCD, states that local agency surplus land that is transferred to another local agency for the transferee agency’s use is exempt from the provisions of Articles II and III of the SLA/HCD Guidelines.

Additionally, per Government Section Code 54221(b)(1) and 54221(f)(1)(D), exempt surplus land is defined to include surplus land that is transferred to another local agency for the agency’s use.

DISCUSSION
The Garden Grove Housing Authority (GGHA) serves as “Housing Successor” to the former Garden Grove Agency for Community Development (“Former Agency”). The GGHA has the authority and power under Housing Authority Law and Housing Successor Law to provide funding for the production, improvement, or preservation of affordable housing.

The City intends to sell and convey the Property to the GGHA for the development of affordable housing. The GGHA agrees to bear all costs associated with the conveyance of the Property and pay the fair market value of $8,550,000 to the City, of which $3,000,000 will be in cash and the remainder in the form of a Promissory Note.

The property is subject to a ground lease with the Garden Grove Public Finance Authority as security associated with the City’s Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A. The sale will be contingent upon substitution of collateral used to secure the bond in exchange for this parcel; and the California Department of Housing and Community Development approving the City’s determination

Page 185 of 448 ends

California Department of Housing and Community Development approving the City’s determination of the Property as exempt surplus land.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The GGHA will make a lump sum payment of $3,000,000 upon the execution of Purchase and Sale agreement and the successful removal of the contingencies. The remaining amount of $5,550,000 will be paid over time with an interest rate of 5% per annum per the Promissory Note (Exhibit C of the Agreement). The City will recognize a revenue in the amount of $8,550,000 when all conditions are met.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council and Housing Authority:

Approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement and other related documents between the City of Garden Grove and the Garden Grove Housing Authority in regards to the sale of real property located at 11390-11400 Stanford Avenue by the City to the Housing Authority in the amount of $8,550,000; and
Authorize the City Manager/Director to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement, Grant Deed, Promissory Note, pertinent documents, and make minor modifications as needed, on behalf of the City.

By: Monica Covarrubias
Sr. Project Manager

ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload
Date Type File Name
Purchase
and Sale
Agreement
6/20/2023 Agreement PURCHASE_AND_SALE_AGREEMENT_CITY_PROPERTY_SALE_TO_HOUSING_AUTHORITY(2).DOCX Appraisal 6/20/2023 Backup
Material
City_of_Garden_Grove_-_Appraisal_Report_-_CC_Parcel_1_Update_Report_- _11390_Stanford_Ave_-_APN_090-154-57.pdf

Page 186 of 448 ends

•
•

1 1772935.2

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

This PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ( the “Agreement”), dated as of June 27, 2023, is entered into by and between the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE , a municipal corporation ( the “City”), and the GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY, a public body, corporate and politic (the “Authority”).

WHEREAS, the City is the owner of the property located at 11390-11400 Stanford Avenue in the City of Garden Grove, County of Orange, State of California, which is the northern portion of Assessor’s Parcel Number 090-154-57, as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, together with any improvements thereon, and all rights and appurtenances, if any, pertaining to s uch land including all adjacent streets, alleys or rights -of-way (collectively, the “Property”).

WHEREAS, the Property is suitable for development of affordable housing; and

WHEREAS, the City recently rezoned the Property (Ordinance No. 2925) to be withi n the CC-3 (Civic Center Core Mixed Use) zone district and the permitted base density was increased to 60 units per acre, which base density is before consideration of use for affordable housing or application of a density bonus or other incentives; and

WHEREAS, the CC -3 zone is established to encourage civic, educational, commercial, high - density residential, and compatible uses that enliven the City’s core and work together to create a walkable, lively district that encourages interaction and engagement in community activities; the zoning allows shared parking facilities, promotes pedestrian orientation of buildings, high-quality architecture, pedestrian -scale landscaping, pathways, and signage reinforce the goal to create places where people, not cars, predominate; and

WHEREAS, the Garden Grove Housing Authority (“Authority”) is a California housing authority acting under the California Housing Authorities Law, Part 2 of Division 24, Section 34200, et seq., of the Health and Safety Code (“HAL”); and

WHEREAS, further, the Authority serves as the “housing successor” to the former Garden Grove Agency for Community Development, a dissolved redevelopment agency (“Former Agency”) pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code, in particular HSC Section 34176.1 (“Dissolution Law” or “Housing Successor Law”) and the Dissolution Law references and incorporates certain affordable housing laws set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq. that survived the dissolution of all Californ ia redevelopment agencies and remain effective as to housing successors, including the Authority (“CRL”); and

WHEREAS, the Authority is authorized and empowered under the HAL, CRL and Dissolution Law to provide funding for the production, improvement, or preservation of affordable housing and appurtenant improvements, and maintains accounts thereunder including funds on deposit in the Low to Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to HSC Section 34176.1 (“LMIHAF”); and

Page 187 of 448 ends

2 1772935.2
WHEREAS, while the City has broad powe rs and purposes, a housing authority (including as a housing successor) is more limited in statutory purpose and focus to carry out affordable housing functions, including, without limitation, the power to finance housing such as through issuance of loans, grants, bonds, or other tax exempt obligations, to construct, maintain, and operate housing, to monitor and enforce covenants and applicable laws, etc.; and

WHEREAS, in more simple wording, a housing authority is an affordable housing specialist entity, with specific regulations, policies, powers, and tools to accomplish the housing duties imposed on the City via State and local law, and thereby best suited, between the two entities (City and Authority), to advance the community’s affordable housing goals; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to GC Section 54221(b)(l) and 54221(f)(1)(D) of the California Surplus Land Act (GC Sections 54220 -54234) (“SLA”), on June 13, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 9788 -23 declaring the Property to be “exempt surplus land” as land that is transferred to another local agency for the agency’s use; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 103(b)(3)(D) of the Surplus Land Act Guidelines (“SLA/HCD Guidelines”) issued by the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”), local agency surplus land that is transferred to another local agency for the transferee agency’s use is exempt from the provisions of Articles II and III of the SLA/HCD Guidelines; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the SLA/HCD Guidelines, the City provided its exemption finding to HCD for its review on June 14, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the Property is subject to a ground lease with the Garden Grove Public Finance Authority as security associated with the City’s $24,790,000 Garden Grove Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A.

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES,

COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTIES AND PURCHASE PRICE. City agrees to convey the Property to Authority. Authority agrees to bear all costs associated with the conveyance of the Property to Authority. Conveyance is to be completed by use of a grant deed substantially in the form of Exhibit “B” hereto (“Grant Deed ”). Authority shall pay to City the sum of EIGHT MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($8,550,000.00) to the City (the “Purchase Price”), $3,000,000.00 of which will be in cash and the remainder in the form of a Promissory Note in the form of Exhibit “C” (the “Promissory Note”).

SECTION 2 . LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION. In contemplation of the provision of Section 895.2 of the California Government Code imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement as defined by Section 895.4 and 895.6 of such Code, each of the Parties, as between themselves, pursuant to the authorization contained in Section 895.4 and 895.6 of such Code, will each assume the full liability imposed on

Page 188 of 448 ends

3 1772935.2
it, or any of its officers, agents, or employees by law for injury caused by negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of this Agreement to the same extent that such liability would be imposed in the absence of Section 895.2 of such Code. To achieve the above- stated purposes, each Party indemnifies and holds harmless the other Party for any loss, costs or expense that may be imposed upon such other Party solely by virtue of such Section 895.2. The provisions of Section 2778 of t he California Civil Code are made part hereof as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3 . EFFECTIVE DATE ; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS. This Agreement shall take effect on the date of approval by the Authority ’s Board and the City Council, provided that recording of the Grant Deed and transfer of title shall not occur until completion of the parties’ compliance with regulatory requirements, including HCD’s approval of City’s “exempt surplus land” finding, release of the Property from the Garden Grove Public Financing Authority ground lease, payment of the initial funds by Authority, and delivery of the executed promissory note to City. It is anticipated that the completion of regulatory compliance and transfer of title will occur on or before October 30, 2023.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE RESPECTIVE DATES SET FORTH BELOW.

AUTHORITY:

GARDEN GROVE HOUSING
AUTHORITY, a public body

Executive Director

Attest:

Secretary

CITY:

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, a California
municipal corporation

City Manager

Attest:

____________________________________
City Clerk

Page 189 of 448 ends

1772935.2
EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY

PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 97-149, IN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, COUNTY

OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 300, PAGES 9 AND 10 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

APN: 090-154-57 (NORTHERN PORTION)

Page 190 of 448 ends

1 1772935.2

EXHIBIT B

FORM OF GRANT DEED

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City Clerk
City of Garden Grove
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92840

[SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY]
No fee document pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 APN: 090-154-57 (Northern Portion)

GRANT DEED
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, a California municipal corporation (“Grantor”) hereby grants to THE GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY, a public body , the real property located in the City of Garden Grove, County of Orange, State of California that is described on “Exhibit A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has execute d this Grant Deed as of the date set forth below.

Dated:

City Manager

Attest:

City Clerk

Page 191 of 448 ends

2 1772935.2
EXHIBIT “A” to GRANT DEED

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
APN: 090-154-57 (NORTHERN PORTION)

PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 97 -149, IN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, COUNTY

OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 300, PAGES 9 AND 10 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

Page 192 of 448 ends

3 1772935.2

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE

This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the deed or grant dated ____________________, 2023, from the City of Garden Grove to the Garden Grove Housing Authority is hereby accepted by order of the Board of Directors of the Garden Grove Housing Authority, pursuant to the authority conferred by the Board of Directors of the Garden Grove Housing Authority by minute action adopted on ____________________, 2023, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE

BY:

Name: Lisa L. Kim
Title: Executive Director

DATED: , 2023

Page 193 of 448 ends

4 1772935.2
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the do cument to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)

COUNTY OF ORANGE )

On ________, 2023, before me, _________________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared Lisa L. Kim, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ________________________________
(seal)

Page 194 of 448 ends

5 1772935.2
EXHIBIT “C”

Promissory Note

Principal Amount: $5,550,000.00

________ ___, 2023

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, the Garden Grove Housing Authority, a public body ("Borrower") promises to pay to the City of Garden Grove, a California municipal corporation ("City") or to order at 11222 Acacia Parkway, Garden Grove, California, 92840, or such other place as City may designate in writing, the principal sum of FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,550,000.00), with interest as set forth in this Note, as funds become available to Borrower on the terms specified below. The principal amount of this Note shall bear interest at the rate of Five percent (5%) per annum (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year).

1. Agreement. This Note is given in accordance with that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement, as defined hereafter.

2. Repayment.

(a) Repayment in Full. Borrower will pay principal and interest payments thereon as funds become available. At the end of the Term of this Note, the entire unpaid principal balance and all accrued interest, if any, shall be due and payable.

(b) Terms of Payment. All amounts due and payable under the Note are payable at the Office of City at the address provided above, or at such other place or places as City may designate to Borrower in writing from time to time. Any payment under this Note shall be paid in currency of the United States of America, which at the time of payment is lawful for the payment of public and private debts and which on the respective dates on which such payments are due shall be in immediately available funds.

(d) Prepayments. Borrower may prepay all or part of the principal balance plus applicable interest due under this Note without penalty.

3. Waivers.

(a) Borrower expressly agrees that this Note or any payment hereunder may be extended from time to time at City's sole discretion and that City may accept security in consideration for any such extension or release any security for this Note at its sole discretion all without in any way affecting the liability of Borrower.

(b) No extension of time for payment of this Note or any installment hereof made by agreement by City with any person or party now or hereafter liable for payment of this Note shall

Page 195 of 448 ends

6 1772935.2
operate to release, discharge, modify, change, or affect the original liability of Borrower under this Note, either in whole or in part.

(c) The obligations of Borrower under this Note shall be absolute and Borrower waives any and all rights: (i) to offset, deduct, or withhold any payments or charges due under this Note for any reasons whatsoever; (ii) of presentment for payment, demand, protest and notices of dishonor and protest made by City; and (iii) with respect to City's diligence in taking any action to collect any sums owing under this Note or in proceeding against any of City's rights and interests in and to properties securing payment of this Note.

4. Governing Law. This Note shall be construed in accordance with and be governed by the laws of the State of California.

5. Severability. If any provision of this Note shall be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

6. No Waiver by City. No waiver of any breach, default, or failure of condition under the terms of this Note or the Deed of Trust or the obligations secured thereby shall be implied from any failure of City to take, or any delay by City in taking, action with respect to such breach, default or failure, or any form of previous waiver of any similar or unrelated breach, default or failure; and waiver of any term of this Note or the Deed of Trust or any of the obligations secured thereby must be made in writing and shall be limited to the express written terms of such waiver.

7. Amendments and Modifications. This Note may not be changed orally, but only by an amendment in writing signed by Borrower and City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has executed this Promissory Note as of the day and year first above written.

GARDEN GROVE HOUSING AUTHORITY

By:

Lisa L. Kim
Executive Director
Date:

ATTEST:

By:

Secretary
Date:

Page 196 of 448 ends

7 1772935.2

EXHIBIT "A" TO PROMISSORY NOTE

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Real property in the City of Garden Grove, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:

PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 97-149, IN THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, COUNTY

OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 300, PAGES 9 AND 10 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

APN: 090-154-57 (NORTHERN PORTION)

Page 197 of 448 ends

APPRAISAL REPORT

PARCEL 1
11390 -11400 STANFORD AVENUE

GARDEN GROVE , CALIFORNIA
APN: 090 -154 -57 (PORTION)

R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

I N C O R P O R A T E D

Page 198 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAi
& AS OCIATE

R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

APPRAISAL REPORT

PARCEL 1
11390-11400 STANFORD AVENUE

GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA
APN: 090-154-57 (portion)

Effective Date
of
Market Value Study
March 15, 2023

Prepared for

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92842

Prepared by
R. P. LAURAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3353 Linden Avenue, Suite 200
Long Beach, California 90807

Date of Report
March 23, 2023

Page 199 of 448 ends

3353 LINDEN AVENUE, SUITE 200
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90807
TELEPHONE (562) 426 -0477
FACSIMILE (562) 988 -2927
[email protected]
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

I N C O R P O R A T E D

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
March 23, 2023

City of Garden Grove
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92842

Attention: Mr. Paul Guerrero
Real Property

Subject: Parcel 1
11390-11400 Stanford Avenue
Garden Grove, California
APN: 090-154-57 (portion)

In accordance with your request and authorization, I have personally inspected and appraised the above -referenced property. The appraisal study included (1) an inspection of the subject property, (2) a review of market data , and (3) the valuation analysis.

The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Stanford Avenue and Eighth Street, in the Civic Center area of the City of Garden Grove. The subject property identified herein as Parcel 1 contains 96,073 square feet of land area.

The site has a corner location on two secondary streets. The subject property was recently re-zoned and is located in the CC-3 (Civic Center Core Mixed Use) zone district. Th e subject site is currently improved with (1) a bank building occupied by a credit union containing 3,926 square feet, and (2) a police annex (office) building containing 5,938 square feet, occupied by the City of Garden Grove Police Department plus related on -site impr ovements (RV storage building, parking areas, landscaping, paving, etc.).

It will be demonstrated in the accompanying report, however, that the maximally productive use, and therefore, the highest and best use of the subject property is multiple family r esidential development in accordance with the existing zoning.

Page 200 of 448 ends

City of Garden Grove
Attention: Paul Guerrero
March 23, 2023

Page 2 ends

R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

I N C O R P O R A T E D
After considering the various factors which influence value , the fee simple market value of the subject property, as of March 15, 2023, is estimated at:

EIGHT MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
$8,550,000

The foregoing value is subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions set forth in the Preface Section, and the valuation study in the Valuation Analysis Section. No portion of this report shall be amended or deleted.

This appraisal complies with the reporting requirements set forth in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, under Standard Rule 2-2(a), for an Appraisal Report. This report has been submitted in duplicate; an electronic (PDF) copy has also been provided.

If you have any questions regarding the report, please contact the undersigned at your convenience.

Very truly yours,

R. P. LAURAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

John P. Laurain, MAI, ASA
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser
California Certification No. AG 025754

JPL:jlr

Page 201 of 448 ends

R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page
Letter of Transmittal
Table of Contents

PREFACE

Location Map
Date of Value
Purpose of the Appraisal
Property Rights Appraised
Intended User of Appraisal
Intended Use of Appraisal
Appraiser’s Certification
Scope of the Appraisal
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
Terms and Definitions

SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Aerial Photograph
Apparent Vestee
Property Address
Legal Description
Site Description
Plat Map
Improvements
Ownership History
Assessment Data
Neighborhood Environment

VALUATION

Highest and Best Use Analysis
Valuation Methods
Sales Comparison Approach
Final Estimate of Value
Marketing Exposure

Page 202 of 448 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

MARKET DATA

Summary of Land Value Indicators
Land Sales Data and Photographs
Market Data Map

ADDENDA

Additional Photographs
CoStar Multiple Family Submarket Report Excerpt
Orange County Regional Data
Qualifications of Appraiser

Page 203 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

PREFACE

Page 204 of 448 ends

DeLorme Street Atlas USA® 2015

LOCATION MAP
Data use subject to license.
© DeLorme. DeLorme Street Atlas USA® 2015.
www.delorme.com
TN
MN (11.7°E)
0 ½ 1 1½ 2
0 1 2 3
mi
km
Scale 1 : 81,250
1" = 1.28 mi Data Zoom 12-0

Page 205 of 448 ends

1-1
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

DATE OF VALUE

The date of value (effective date) employed in this report, and all opinions and computations expressed herein, are based on March 15, 2023. Said date being generally concurrent with the inspection of the subject property, and the valuation analysis process.

PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL

The purpose of this appraisal report is to express an estimate of market value, in fee simple, for the subject property, absent any liens, leases, or other encumbrances, as of the date of value set forth above. The definition of market value is set forth in the following portion of this section following the heading “Terms and Definitions.”

Further, it is the purpose of this appraisal report to describe the subject property, and to render an opinion of the highest and best use based on (1) the character o f potential development of the property appraised, (2) the requirements of local governmental authorities affecting the subject property, (3) the reasonable demand in the open market for properties similar to the subject property, and (4) the location of t he subject property considered with respect to other existing and competitive districts within the immediate and general subject market area.

Further, it is the purpose of this appraisal report to provide an outline of certain factual and inferential info rmation which was compiled and analyzed in the process of completing this appraisal study.

PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED

The property rights appraised herein are those of the fee simple interest. Fee simple is defined as, "An absolute fee; a fee without limitations to any particular class of heirs, or restrictions, but subject to the limitations of eminent domain, escheat, police power, and taxation. An inheritable estate."

Page 206 of 448 ends

1-2
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

INTENDED USER OF APPRAISAL

It is understood that t he intended user of the appraisal will be the client, the City of Garden Grove, and specific representatives thereof.

INTENDED USE OF APPRAISAL

It is understood that this appraisal will be utilized by the City of Garden Grove and specific representatives thereof to establish the market value of the subject property for the possible disposition (sale) of the property appraised.

Page 207 of 448 ends

1-3
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned does hereby certify that:

I have personally inspected the subject property; I have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate which is the subject of this appraisal report. Also, I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report, or the parties involved in this assignment.

My engageme nt in this assignment and the amount of compensation are not contingent upon the reporting or development of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a predetermined or stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. Also, to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this appraisal report, upon which the analyses, opinio ns, and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct.

This appraisal report sets forth all of the assumptions and limiting conditions (imposed by the terms of this assignment or by the undersigned), affecting my personal, impartial, and un biased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.

The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions, were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practi ce of the Appraisal Institutes, and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. As of the date of this report I have completed the continuing education program for Designated Member of the Appraisal Institute, the State of California and the American Society of Appraisers; note that duly authorized representatives of said organizations have the right to review this report. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.

No one other than the undersigned prepared the analyses, conclusions, and opinions for this appraisal study. Abagail Penksaw assisted with market research, the appraisal inspection , and the valuation analysis . No other person provided significant professional assistance. I have not appraised or provided any other services pertaining to the subject property in the last three years.

______________________________
John P. Laurain, MAI, ASA
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser
California Certification No. AG 025754
Renewal Date: April 16, 2025

Page 208 of 448 ends

1-4
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL

The appraiser, in connection with the following appraisal study, has:

1. Been retained, and has accepted the assignment, to make an objective analysis and valuation study of the subject property and to report, without bias, the estimate of fair market value.

The subject property is particularly described in the following portion of this report in the section entitled Subject Property Description.

2. Toured the general area by automobile to become acquainted with the extent, condition, and quality of nearby developments, sales and offerings in the area, density and type of
development, topographical features, economic con ditions, trends toward change, etc.

3. Walked within the subject property, and some of the nearby neighborhood, to become acquainted with the current partic - ular attributes, or shortcomings, of the subject property.

4. Completed an inspection of the subject pro perty for the purpose of becoming familiar with certain physical charac - teristics.

5. Made a visual observation concerning public streets, access, drainage, and topography of the subject property.

6. Obtained information regarding public utilities an d sanitary sewer available at the subject site.

7. Made, or obtained from other qualified sources, calculations on the area of land contained within the subject property. Has made, or caused to be made, plats and plot plan drawings of the subject property, and has checked such plats and plot plan drawings for accuracy and fair representation.

8. Taken photographs of the subject property, together with photographs of the immediate environs.

9. Made, or caused to be made, a search of public records for factual information regarding recent sales of the subject property.

Page 209 of 448 ends

SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL (Continued)
1-5
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

10. Reviewed current maps, zoning ordinances, and other material for additional background information pertaining to the subject property, and sale properties.

11. Attempted to visualize the subject property as it would be viewed by a willing and informed buyer, as well as a willing and informed seller.

12. Interviewed various persons, in both public and private life, for factual and inferential information helpful in this appraisal study.

13. Formed an opinion of the highest and best use applicable to the subject property appraised herein.

14. Made, or caused to be made, a search for recent sales of comparable properties. Has viewed, confirmed the sale price, and obtained certain other information pertaining to each sale property contained in this report.

15. Formed an estimate of mar ket value of the subject property, as of the date of value expressed herein, by application the Sales Comparison Approach ; the Cost and Income
Capitalization Approaches were not considered applica ble in the subject case.

16. Prepared and delivered this appraisal report in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, and in summation of all the activities outlined above.

Page 210 of 448 ends

1-6
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

This appraisal is made with the following understanding as set forth in items No. 1 through 17, inclusive:

1. That this narrative Appraisal Report is intended to comply with reporting requirements set forth in the U niform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, under Standard Rule 2 -2(a), for an Appraisal Report. The information contained in this appraisal report is specific to the needs of the client; no responsibility is assumed for the unauthorized use of this report.

2. That title to the subject property is assumed to be good and merchantable. Liens and encumbrances, if any, have not been deducted from the final estimate of value. The subject property has been appraised as though under responsible ownership. The legal description is assumed accurate.

3. That the appraiser assumes there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the subject property, subsoil, structures, or other improvements, if any, which would render them more or less valuable, u nless otherwise stated. Further, the appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions or for the engineering which might be required to discover such
conditions. That mechanical and electrical systems and equipment, if any, except as otherwise may be noted in this report, are assumed to be in good working order. The property appraised is assumed to meet all governmental codes, require- ments, and restrictions, unless otherwise stated.

4. That no soils report of the subject property was provided to the appraiser; therefore information, if any, provided by other qualified sources pertaining to these matters is believed accurate, but no liability is assumed for such matters. Further, information, estimates and opinions furnished by others and contained in this report pertaining to the subject property and market data were obtained from sources considered reliable and are believed to be true and correct. No responsibility, however, for the accuracy of such items can be assumed by the appraiser.

Page 211 of 448 ends

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS (Continued)
1-7
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

5. That unless otherwise stated herein, it is assumed there are no encroachments, easements, soil toxics/contaminants, or other physical conditions adversely affecting the value of the subject property.

6. That no report(s) pertaining to mold, organic toxins, or chemical substances at the subject property was provided to the appraiser; therefore, information, if any, provided by other qualified sources pertaining to these matters is believed accurate, but no liability is assumed by the appraiser for such matters. That unless otherwise stated herein, the subject property has been appraised assuming the absence of mold, organic toxins, the presence of asbestos, or other organic and/or chemical subs tances which may adversely affect the value of the subject property.

7. That no opinion is expressed regarding matters which are legal in nature or which require specialized investigation or knowledge ordinarily not employed by real estate appraisers, even though such matters may be mentioned in the report.

8. That no oil rights have been included in the opinion of value expressed herein. Further, that oil rights, if existing, are assumed to be at least 500 feet below the surface of the land, without the right of surface entry.

9. That the distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements, if any, applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and improvements must not be use d in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used.

10. That the valuation of the property appraised is based upon economic and financing conditions prevailing as of the date of value set forth herein. Further, the valuation assumes goo d, competent, and aggressive management of the subject
property.

11. That the appraiser has conducted a visual inspection of the subject property and the market data properties. Should subsequent information be provided relative to changes or differences in (1) the quality of title, (2) physical condition or characteristics of the property, and/or (3) governmental

Page 212 of 448 ends

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS (Continued)
1-8
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
restrictions and regulations, which would increase or decrease the value of the subject property, the appraiser reserve s the right to amend the final estimate of value.

12. That the appraiser, by reason of this appraisal, is not required to give testimony in court or at any governmental or quasi - governmental hearing with reference to the property
appraised, unless contractual arrangements have been previ- ously made therefor.

13. That drawings, plats, maps, and other exhibits contained in this report are for illustration purposes only and are not necessarily prepared to standard engineering or architectural scale.

14. That this report is effective only when considered in its entire form, as delivered to the client. No portion of this report will be considered binding if taken out of context.

15. That possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of pub lication, nor shall the contents of this report be copied or conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, sales, news, or other media, without the written consent and approval of the appraiser, particularly with regard to the valuation of the property appraised and the identity of the appraiser, or the firm with which he is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute, or the American Society of Appraisers, or designa tions conferred by said organizations.

16. That the form, format, and phraseology utilized in this report, except the Certification, and Terms and Definitions, shall not be provided to, copied, or used by, any other real estate appraiser, real estate economist, real estate broker, real estate salesperson, property m anager, valuation consultant,
investment counselor, or others, without the written consent and approval of Ronald P. Laurain.

17. That this appraisal study is considered completely confidential and will not be disclosed or discussed, in whole or in part, with anyone other than the client, or persons designated by the client.

Page 213 of 448 ends

1-9
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Certain technical terms have been used in the following report which are defined, herein, for the benefit of those who may not be fully familiar with said terms.

MARKET VALUE (or Fair Market Value):

Market value is sometimes referred to as Fair Market Value; the latter is a legal term and a common synonym of Market Value. Market value as defined in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) is defined as follows:

"The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and
knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:

1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated;

2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests;

3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;

4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and

5. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing, or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale."

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH:

One of the three accepted methods of estimating Market Value. This approach consists of the investigation of recent sales of similar propert ies to determine the price at which said properties sold. The information so gathered is judged and considered by the appraiser as to its comparability to the subject properties.

Recent comparable sales are the basis for the Sales Comparison Approach.

Page 214 of 448 ends

TERMS AND DEFINITIONS (Continued)
1-10
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
COST-SUMMATION APPROACH:

Another accepted method of estimating Market Value. This approach consists of estimating the new construction cost of the building and yard improvements and making allowances for appropriate amount of depreciation. The depreciated reconstruction value of the improvements is then added to the Land Value estimate gained from the Sales Comparison Approach. The sum of these two figures is the value indicated by the Cost-Summation Approach.

INCOME CAPITALIZATION APPROACH:

The Income Capitalization Approach consists of capitalizing the net income of the property under study. The capitalization method studies the income stream, allows for (1) vacancy and credit loss, (2) fix ed expenses, (3) operating expenses, and (4) reserves for replacement, and estimates the amount of money which would be paid by a prudent investor to obtain the net income. The capitalization rate is usually commensurate with the risk, and is adjusted for future depreciation or appreciation in value.

DEPRECIATION:

Used in this appraisal to indicate a lessening in value from any one or more of several causes. Depreciation is not based on age alone, but can result from a combination of age, condition or repair, functional utility, neighborhood influ - ences, or any of several outside economic causes. Depreciation applies only to improvements. The amount of depreciation is a matter for the judgment of the appraiser.

HIGHEST AND BEST USE:

Used in this appraisal to describe that private use which will (1) yield the greatest net return on the investment, (2) be permitted or have the reasonable probability of being permitted under applicable laws and ordinances, and (3) be appropriate and feasibl e under a reasonable planning, zoning, and land use concept.

Page 215 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Page 216 of 448 ends

2-1
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

SUBJECT PROPERTY

Aerial photograph of the subject property (Parcel 1).

VESTEE: City of Garden Grove

ADDRESS: 11390-11400 Stanford Avenue
Garden Grove, CA 92840

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1, per map recorded in Book 300, Page 09 of Maps, in the office of the County
Recorder, County of Orange, California.

COMMENT: The subject property identified herein as Parcel 1 represents the north portion of the larger
Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 090-154-57.

Page 217 of 448 ends

2-2
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

SITE DESCRIPTION

LOCATION: The subject property is located at the
southwest corner of Stanford Avenue and
Eighth Street, in the City of Garden Grove.

LAND SHAPE: Effectively rectangular land configuration.

DIMENSIONS: Various dimensions, per Assessor’s map.

LAND AREA: 96,073 square feet, per information provided by the City of Garden Grove.

TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level.

DRAINAGE: Appears to be adequate.

FLOOD HAZARD: The subject property is located on FEMA Flood Zone Map 06059C0143J, dated December 3,
2009; per said map, the subject site is located
in Flood Zone X, an area of 0.2% chance of
flood. Flood insurance (for improved properties)
is not federally required by lenders for loans on
properties in Flood Zone X.

SOIL STABILITY: Appears to be adequate based on the subject development, as well as developments in the
immediate area. A soils report, howev er, was
not provided for review.

SOIL CONTAMINATION: None known or observed, however, an environ- mental assessment report was not provided for
review. The subject site has been appraised as
though free of soil contaminants requiring
remediation.

Page 218 of 448 ends

2-3
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
APN: 090-154-57 (portion)

Page 219 of 448 ends

-~ .'':~"~-~'.:~:~. 2,;·::_
13 r. STANFORO
T ·i i-
41 1"' GAROffl GROVE
~
~
I :
' ' ' I I I I
I I l :
1-_ I TR,iCT l t
~ , ____ I_J ___ ~i__ ~-~--.:!l_
~ I I ;::,
-~
I
f ___________ !.,.~----------
I ® I
' ' I '
~----------~~~-----------
I
"'"1@1
BLK. 9 ~---------qr~-------
~ I I
i r---------~;1~14-
~ I I
L!---------- ---!6J_,~ __ !!!?_ ;JfJ_ __
: Q ® r~ 1V l{J.52AO:-. e:

I ½
I
BLK.10
I ~
~
",;I~ ,;; ~
~
¥;:~3' I
_j "g ACACIA
7 MARCH 1951
it r 7
l
~~
~~ii:•
\Jt,Qf
~---~ 1117711 r
GARDEN GROVE HOM£ TRACT
,RAO NO. Jl9

PARCEL /,/AP

PARCEL MAP
/,/,/,/, 4-57
/,/,/,/, 15-1
P.11. 186-25
P.M. 300-09
090-1 5
I
~-) l----~) l /I
7 L~ ·~i' ~ 7 ,j'·I ~~ .,,
~ -@ . -@ -_@ ' -
,n• Id ~ AIHS
P,R,' ~
"'~
1a1 .so·
, e @ ~
/,If".""'
_ @ BLK. 12 ff.;;_-
6 ',:,
~ Q ~ ' 1
I ,. ~: _,_ '. ,,,_., I ~
• @ ~ /'N_ 186-23
I
HOME TRACT PA.Ji". 2 -..
® ; < i, ,"@
r.s,o,:_t". -: -36AC
~ i ~ , • ~
~ ~ ~ ~
.:J ZU-..la .....
l r
NCTE -ASSE55Df?' S BU)CK ,1
PAPCLL NUMB[RS
SHDWN lN C !HCLES
r PARKWAY ~ _J
t:SSESSOR'S MA_P
SDGK 090 PACE 15
CDUNTY OF ORI.NCE CJ
SITE DESCRIPTION (Continued)
2-4
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
OIL/MINERAL RIGHTS: The subject appraisal specifically excludes any existing oil or mineral rights. Further, oil or
mineral rights, if existing, are assumed to be at
least 500 feet below the surface of the land,
without the right of surface entry.

EARTHQUAKE FAULT: While the greater Southern Cali fornia area is prone to earthquakes, no seismic or geological
studies were provided for review. No responsi-
bility is assumed for the possible impact of
seismic activity or earthquakes.

FRONTAGE: The subject property has 295± feet of frontage on Stanford Avenue and 304.13 feet of
frontage on Eighth Street.

RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH: Stanford Avenue: 80 feet.

Eighth Street: 60 feet.

STREET SURFACING: Asphalt paved traffic lanes.

CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK: Concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks.

STREET LIGHTS: Street lights mounted ornamental standards.

UTILITIES: Water, gas, electric power, telephone service, and sanitary sewer are available in the
immediate area.

ENCROACHMENTS: None apparent, however, a survey pertaining to the subject property was not provided for
review.

Page 220 of 448 ends

SITE DESCRIPTION (Continued)
2-5
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
EASEMENTS: A Preliminary Title Report was not provided for review. Easements, if existing, are assumed to
be located along the property boundaries
and/or not interfering with the existing or any
future highest and best use development. It is
assumed there are no “cross -lot” or “blanket”
easements which will preclude a hig hest and
best use development.

ILLEGAL USES: None observed.

PRESENT USE: Credit Union of Southern California and City of Garden Grove Police annex facility.

ZONING: The subject property was recently re-zoned per
Ordinance No. 2925 to be within the CC -3
(Civic Center Core Mixed Use ) zone district
which “is established to encourage civic,
educational, commercial, high -density res -
idential, and compatible uses that enliven the
City’s core and work together to create a
walkable, lively district that encourages
interaction and engagement in community
activities. Shared parking facilities, pedestrian
orientation of buildings, high -quality
architecture, pedestrian -scale landscaping,
pathways, and signage reinforce the goal to
create places where people, not cars,
predominate.”

The permitted base density was also recently
increased from 42 units per acre to 60 units per
acre, which base density is before
consideration of any affordable housing or
other bonus incentives. The minimum lot size
is 15,000 square feet. The site is within a 75-
foot height district, with a 45 -foot height
limitation along certain property boundaries.

Page 221 of 448 ends

SITE DESCRIPTION (Continued)
2-6
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
HIGHEST AND BEST USE: The reader is referred to the first portion of the Valuation Analysis Section for a discussion
regarding the highest and best use of the
subject site.

IMPROVEMENTS

COMMENT: The subject property is improved with a bank
building utilized by a credit union , a public
annex building utilized by the Garden Grove
Police Department, an RV storage building ,
paved parking areas, landscaping, etc. It will
be demonstrated in the Valuation Analysis
Section, however, that the highest and best
use of the subject property is demolition and
clearing of the existing building and site
improvements to make way for a multiple
family residential development.

BANK BUILDING: The bank building is located at 11390 Stanford Avenue and is occupied by Credit Union of
Southern California. The building contai ns
3,925 square feet and is in overall average -
good condition. Construction details include
concrete block exterior walls; rolled asphalt
roofing; anodized frame windows and doors;
acoustic tile set in T -bar and drywall ceilings;
ceramic tile and carpet floor coverings; painted
drywall interior walls; two 2 -piece restroom
facilities; and a forced air heating and cooling
system.

Page 222 of 448 ends

IMPROVEMENTS (Continued)
2-7
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

ANNEX BUILDING: The annex building is located at 114 00 Stanford Avenue and is currently occupied by
the Garden Grove Police Department. The
building contains 5,937 square feet and is in
overall average condition. Construction details
include wood frame and stucco construction;
rolled asphalt roofing; anodized frame windows
and doors; acoustic tile set in T-bar ceilings;
ceramic tile and carpet floor coverings; two 3-
piece restrooms; and a forced air heating and
cooling system.

OWNERSHIP HISTORY

COMMENT: Information regarding the date of acquisition
by the City of Garden Grove was not provided
to the appraiser. The acquisition of the
property by a public agency, however, may not
be reflective of, or relevant to, the current fair
market value.

ASSESSMENT D ATA

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 090-154-57 (entire parcel)*

ASSESSED VALUATIONS: Land: $1,428,607
Improvements: $1,145,612

TAX RATE AREA: 18030

TAX YEAR: 2022-2023

REAL ESTATE TAXES: $3,897.02*

*As noted, the subject property represents a portion of the larger APN. Real estate taxes will be adjusted in the event the subject property is sold to a private party. The adjusted real estate taxes will be 1.02±% of the sale price, or Assessor’s “cash value.” In the absence of a sale, transfer, or capital improvements, the maximum allowable increase in the assessed valuations is 2% per year, per Real Estate Tax Initiative of 1978 (Proposition 13).

Page 223 of 448 ends

2-8
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

NEIGHBORHOOD ENVIRONMENT

LOCATION: The subject property is located in the central portion of the City of Garden Grove, in the Civic
Center area. The immediate area is developed
with certain public uses (library, city hall, police
department, etc.), as well as private uses. The
subject property is located within a quarter
mile of the Garden Grove Fire Department, City
Hall, and Garden Grove High School.

ACCESS: Major north-south thoroughfares in the subject
area include Euclid Street, Harbor Avenue, and
Brookhurst Street. M ajor east-west thorough-
fares include Garden Grove Boulevard, Trask
Avenue, and Lampson Avenue. The Santa Ana
(5) Freeway is located approx imately
three miles to the east and the Garden Grove
(22) Freeway is located approximately

0.75 miles to the south of the subject property.

Said freeways are part of the greater freeway
network serving the Southern California region.

LAND USES: The immediate neighborhood is zoned CC-3
(Civic Center Core ). Primary street s are
generally developed with multiple family
residential uses as well as certain commercial
retail, office, and related uses. The majority of
secondary streets in the immediate subject
area are developed with multiple family
residential developments. Further, as stated,
there are various public uses in the immediate
area.

The City of Garden Grove encompasses
18 square miles populated by just under
175,000 residents within the corporate limits of
the City. The predominant land use in the City
is residential (51%), followed by commercial
and industrial (14%). Office use make up less
than 1% of the land within the city limits.

The remaining land area is open space,
institutional/-government, vacant land parcels,
and street and railroad rights of way.

Page 224 of 448 ends

NEIGHBORHOOD ENVIRONMENT (Continued)
2-9
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
BUILT-UP: The subject neighborhood is effectively 9 5%
built-up, including public parks, public facilities,
parking lots and school sites.

PRICE RANGE: Single family residential properties generally range from $ 500,000 to exceeding $ 800,000,
exclusive of condominium developments.

The indicated price range is dependent upon
the various elements of comparability which
include location, building size, building con -
dition, design, number of bedrooms and baths,
and the overall land size.

PRICE TREND: There was an upward value trend affecting
residential properties in the greater subject
market area from the first part of 2013 through
the mid portion of 2018, after which the rate of
increase subsided. Residential property values,
how-ever, continued to increase, though at
lower rates of appreciation, from the first
portion of 2019 through the first portion of
2020, after which there was a significant
decrease in residential sales act ivity and
property values. Note that single family
residential property values were not negatively
affected by the COVID -19 pandemic and
resultant “Stay -at-home” orders (lockdown),
which began in March 2020 , however, certain
multiple family properties expe rienced a
stabilization in pricing and sales volumes due,
in part, to rent ordinances which precluded rent
increases in certain markets.

While the number of sale transactions de -
creased at the start of the lockdown, a number
of agents, as well as various published articles,
have indicated that after some limited activity,
residential buying activity surged, with many
residential property listings receiving multiple
offers, sometimes at “above asking” prices.

Page 225 of 448 ends

NEIGHBORHOOD ENVIRONMENT (Continued)
2-10
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
PRICE TREND: (continued) In the first porti on of 2021, there was a significant increase in the single family
residential market, which experienced annual
increases in property values in excess of 20%.

Said increase s continued through the latter
portion of 2021, due to histori cally low
mortgage interest rates, as well as a lack of
inventory. Multiple family residential properties
likewise saw some slight increases in property
values throughout 2021. In the first portion of
2022 the rate of appreciation for single family
properties began to decrease slightly, and the
market generally stabilized in the latter portion
of 2022 through the present time, due
primarily to inflationary concerns and a
significant rise in interest rates. Multiple family
residential property values remained relatively
stable through the first portion of 2022,
however, based on discussions with brokers
and other market participants there has been a
“softening” in the multiple family residential
market, especially for vacant land parcels, from
the mid portion of 2022 through the present
time, due primarily to the rise in interest rates
and difficulty in obtaining construction
financing.

AGE RANGE: The age range of residential buildings in the immediate and general subject market area is
generally from 25 to 70 years. Single family
residential properties within the immediate
subject market area range from effectively new
to 70 years.

OTHER: The availability and adequacy of public
facilities, tr ansportation, schools, commercial
facilities, recreational opportunities, and resi -
dential housing are rated fair -average. The
City of Garden Grove provides police protection
and fire protection. Refer to the CoStar Central
OC West market report, as well as the Orange
County Regional Data, in the Addenda Section.

Page 226 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

VALUATION ANALYSIS

Page 227 of 448 ends

3-1
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

VALUATION ANALYSIS

The purpose of this valuation study is the estimation of market value of the subject property, as of the date of value set forth herein. Prior to the application of the appraisal process, which in this case employs the Sales Comparison Approach, it is necessary to consider and analyze the highest and best use of the subject property.

HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS:

The 14th Edition of The Appraisal of Real Estate, by the Appraisal Institute, defines highest and best use on Page 332, as follows:

"The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value.”

In the process of forming an opinion of highest and best use, consideration must be given to various environmental and political factors such as zoning restrictions, probability of zone change, private deed restrictions, location, land size and configuration, topography, and the character/quality of land uses in the immediate and general subject market area.

There are four basic criteria utilized in the highest and best use analysis of a property as if vacant, as well as presently improved. The four criteria are summarized as follows:

1. Physically possible.

2. Legally permissible.

3. Financially feasible.

4. Maximally productive.

The foregoing are typically considered sequentially; for example, a specific use may prove to be maximally productive, however, if it is not legally permissible, or physically possible, the productivity is irrelevant.

The site has a corner location on two secondary streets.

Page 228 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS: (Continued)
3-2
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
The site has a generally rectangular land configuration. The subject property is rated average-good with respect to overall corner location/access.

All public utilities including water, gas, electric power, telephone, as well as sanitary sewer are available to the site. The physical characteristics of the subject parcel are considered a dequate to accommodate legally permissible uses.

The subject property was recently re -zoned and is located in the CC-3 (Civic Center Core Mixed Use) zone district. The permitted base development density, before affordable housing or other incentives and bonuses, is 60 units per acre.

The subject site contains 96 ,073 square feet, or 2.206 acre, allowing a base density of 132 units. The minimum lot siz e is 15,000 square feet and the maximum building height is generally 75 feet, however, the height is reduced to 45 feet along property boundaries.

The subject property is currently improved with (1) a bank building occupied by a credit union containing 3,926 square feet, and (2) a police annex (office) building containing 5,938 square feet, occupied by the City of Garden Grove Police Department , and related on -site improvements (RV storage building, parking areas, landscaping, paving, etc.). Said uses ar e considered legally permissible, with the credit union occupancy considered as a pre-existing legal nonconforming use. The buildings contain 9,864 total square feet.

The credit union building was leased for $5,390 per month (effective December 1, 2019), or $1.37 per square foot of building area, with a one-year option. The police annex building is a public use. For the purpose of a feasibility analysis, the value as improved has been considered assuming a conversion of the police annex building to an office use.

Under the feasibility study a rental rate at or above the upper end of office rental rates of $2.50 per square foot has been employed. A vacancy factor of 5% and an expense ratio of 35% is applied to derive the net operating income (NOI).

The NOI is then capitalized at 5.0% in the feasibility analysis to derive an indicated value of $3,654,612, as follows:

Page 229 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

HIGHEST AND BEST USE ANALYSIS: (Continued)
3-3
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

As stated, the subject site contains 96,073 square feet of land area. The foregoing value of $3,654,612 equates to $38.04 per square foot of land area, as presently improved.

It will be demonstrated in the latter portion of this section that the value of the underlying land, as if vacant and available for a private highest and best use development, is $89.00 per square foot, adjusted to $8,550,000. As such, it is apparent that the value of the subject site, as if vacant, significantly exceeds the value as improved.

After considering the physical characteristics of the subject property, as well as the legally permissible and financially feasible uses, the maximally productive use, and therefore, the highest and best use of the subject property is multiple family residential development at or near the maximum allowable density. Any interim value of the existing impr ovements is considered offset by demolition and clearing of the same to make way for a highest and best use multiple family residential development. The subject property has been appraised accordingly.

Annual Market Rent:
9,864 sf x $2.50 x 12 = 295,920$
Vacancy rate: 5% - 14,796
Effective Gross Income: 281,124$
Expenses: 35% - 98,393
Net Operating Income: 182,731$
Capitalization Rate: 5.0%
Indicated Value as Improved: 3,654,612$

Page 230 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

3-4
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
VALUATION METHODS:

There are three conventional methods (approaches) which can be used to estimate value. They are the Sales Comparison Approach, Cost -Summation Approach, and Income Capitalization Approach. The reader is referred to the last portion of the Preface Section, following the heading "Terms and Definitions," for a brief description of each approach to value.

There are three conventional methods (approac hes) which can be used to estimate value. They are the Sales Comparison Approach, Cost -Summation Approach, and Income Capitalization Approach. The Sales Comparison Approach is the only valuation method considered reliable as an indicator of land value.

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH:

The Sales Comparison Approach takes into account properties which have sold in the open market. This approach, whether applied to vacant or improved property, is based on the Principle of Substitution which states, "The maximum value of a property tends to be set by the cost of acquiring an equally desirable substitute property, assuming no costly delay is encoun tered in making the substitution." Thus, the Sales Comparison Approach attempts to equate the subject property with sale properties by reviewing and weighing the various elements of comparability.

The Sales Comparison Approach has been applied to the subject property after an investigation was conducted of reasonably comparable industrial land having recently sold within the immediate and general subject market area. The reader is referred to the Market Data Section for detailed information pertaining to each sale property. Refer also to the Market Data Map in the Market Data Section, for an illustration of the location of each sale property.

The reader is referred to the summary of Land Value Indicators on the following page. The sale properties surveyed consist of effectively vacant land parcels , and improved parcels acquired for redevelopment, ranging in size from 20,366 to 244,466 square feet. The purchase prices per square foot of land area range from $74.31 to $147.30. The sales are set forth in chronological order and took place between February 2021 and December 2022. Due to the lack of sale properties in the immediate subject area it was necessary to expand the geographical and chronological search parameters.

Page 231 of 448 ends

3-5
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

LAND VALUE INDICATORS:

Units $ Per SF
Data Date Zoning Land Size Corner Sale Price Density $/Unit 1 2-21 R3 27,989 sf no $2,080,000 18 $74.31
7935-7941 Greenleaf Ave., Whittier 28 du/ac $115,556
2 7-21 HDR 244,466 sf yes $19,500,000 139 $79.77
445 S. Van Buren St., Placentia entitled 25 du/ac $140,288 3 9-21 CC-3 41,778 sf yes $3,800,000 58 $90.96
11432 Stanford Ave., Garden Grove 60 du/ac $65,517
4 10-21 CCA 33,750 sf yes $3,220,000 23 $95.41
2212 E. 7th St., Long Beach entitled 30 du/ac $140,000
5 12-21 R-4 46,440 sf no $4,800,000 24 $103.36
13800 Milton Ave., Westminister entitled 23 du/ac $200,000 6 3-22 R3-1XL-CPIO 20,503 sf yes $2,650,000 25 $129.25
1627 Beacon St., San Pedro 53 du/ac $106,000
7 12-22 C2-1 20,366 sf yes $3,000,000 36 $147.30
16101 S. Figureroa St., Gardena entitled 77 du/ac $83,333

Page 232 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: (Continued)
3-6
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
Financing and Cash Equivalency Adjustments:

Sale properties are adjusted for financing arrangements involved in transactions which are not market-typical. A cash equivalency adjustment is generally made in those cases where the cash down payment is generally less than 10% of the purchase price and the financing is other than conven tional. The less -than- typical cash down payment, combined with other than conventional financing (such as seller financing), could influence a higher purchase price.

All of the sale properties involved all cash trans actions, conventional or construction financing w hich were deemed typical of the market with the exception of Data 7, which involved seller financing based on a short-term (six month) “bridge” loan. The listing agent indicated the buyer has been unable to obtain construction financing and is currently in default on the short term loan and, absent the seller loan the asking price would have been reduced. As such, a downward adjustment of 20% is applied to Data 7 for seller financing. A cash equivalency adjustment, therefore, has not been applied to any of the sale transactions.

Market Conditions:

An adjustment for market conditions (date of sale) is appropriate when certain sales occur during a rising or declining market. The adjustments are based upon observations of the real estate market and value appreciation/declining cycles dating back more than 15 years.

Real estate trends affecting residential properties in the subject market area experienced an upward value trend starting in 2013 and the rate of increase accelerated in 2015 through 2021. Note that single family residential property values were not negatively affected by the COVID -19 pandemic and resultant “Stay-at-home” orders (lockdown), which began in March 2020 , however, certain multiple family properties experienced a stabilization in pricing and sales volumes due, in part, to rent ordinances which precluded rent increases in certain markets, which stabilization is not necessarily reflected in certain data.

Page 233 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: (Continued)
3-7
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

Multiple family residential properties saw some slight increases in property values throughout 2021. In the first portion of 2022 the rate of appreciation for single family properties began to decrease slightly, and the market generally stabilized in the latter portion of 2022 through the present time, due primarily to inflationary concerns and a significant rise in interest rates. Multiple family residential property values remained relatively stable through the first portion of 2022, however, based on discussions with brokers and other market participants there has been a “softening” in the multiple family residential market, especially for vacant land parcels, from the mid portion of 2022 through the present time, due primarily to the rise in interest rates and difficulty in obtaining construction financing.

The reader is referred to the following CoStar graph pertaining to various multiple family residential markets in the general subject area. The reader is also referred to excerpts from the Multiple Family Submarket report, Central OC West, as obtained from CoStar, in the Addenda Section containing additional data and information pertaining to multiple family residential trends.

Page 234 of 448 ends

Multi-Fam ily .., Submarke ts ,.. Clear E Filters Sort Save [lIJ ·- ~

MAP UST COMPARE
Q Find + s ort: Market Sale Price/Unit Inflation Adjusted P'J History 1Y 3Y SY 10Y All r;j Fo recast 1V 3Y SY ~ Hide Unselected Forecast
$GOOK
$550 K
$SOOK
~
$450 K
C
~
~
w
$400 K <ii en
$350 K
$300 K
19 20 21 22 23
$250K
■ Centra l QC East of 1-5 ■ CostaMesa ■ Huntington Beach/Seal Beach ■ Anaheim ■ Central QC West of 1-5 North County VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: (Continued)
3-8
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
Based on the foregoing, the market conditions adjustment applied to the sale properties is based on the following schedule:

January-December 2021: + 6.0% per year, or + 0.5% per month January-June 2022: 0.0% per year, or 0.0% per month
January-December 2022: - 6.0% per year, or - 0.50% per month January-March 2023: - 6.0% per year, or - 0.50% per month

Given the current uncertainty in the market due to recent inflationary and interest rate concerns, the adjustments for market conditions are applied to the various sale properties beginning the first full month following the date of sale through and including March 2023.

Elements of Comparability:

All of the sales employed herein conveyed title to the fee simple interest, and represent arms-length transactions. After viewing all of the land sale properties, an analysis was made of the various elements of comparability. Some of those elements include, but are not limited to, the following:

General location. Corner location/access.

Best use/zoning. Topography.

Development density. Plans or entitlements.

Land size. Off-site improvements.

Land configuration and utility. Improvements/demolition

As stated, the marketability of each sale property was considered. Marketability is the practical aspect of selling a property in view of all the elements constituting value, and certain economic and financing conditions prevailing as of the date of sale.

It should be noted that the above elements of comparability were not assigned equal weight in making the analysis of each property. The general location , best use/zoning density, land configuration, corner location /access, freeway proximity, and improvements/demolition were considered the most important factors when analyzing the various sale properties, in the subject case.

Page 235 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: (Continued)
3-9
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
The reader is referred to the Land Sales Comparison Grid on the following page.

As stated, quantitative adjustments have been applied to the various sale properties for market conditions (date of sale). The elements of compa rability have been considered on a qualitative basis due to the lack of direct market evidence regarding quantitative adjustments in the subject market. Note that the various elements of comparability were not assigned similar weight; the overall comparability of each sale property is set forth on the bottom of the Comparison Grid.

Data 1 and 7, located in Whittier and Gardena, respectively, are deemed inferior to the subject property regarding general location. Data 6, located in San Pedro with an ocean view, is deemed superior with respect to location. The remaining sell properties are considered generally similar regarding location.

Note that larger properties, whether improved or vacant land, sometimes sell at overall lower rates per square foot in accordance with general economic principals, however, this is partially offset when considering the development density. As such, Data 1, 4 and 7, which represent smaller lot and block parcels, are deemed superior to the subject site (on a rate per square foot basis).

Conversely, Data 2, representing a larger acreage parcel, is deemed inferior with respect to land size, on a rate per square foot basis.

The subject property has a base development density of 60 units per acre, or one unit per 726 square feet of land area. In such consideration, Data 7, having a higher development density, is deemed superior to the subject property when considered on a rate per square foot basis. Data 1, 2, 4 and 5, having lower development densities, are deemed inferior accordingly. Data 3 and 6 are considered to have generally comparable development densities.

Page 236 of 448 ends

3-10
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

Data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Purchase price: $2,080,000 $19,500,000 $3,800,000 $3,220,000 $4,800,000 $25 $36 Rate per sq. ft.: $74.31 $79.77 $90.96 $95.41 $103.36 $129.25 $147.30 Property rights: fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple fee simple Conditions of sale: - - - - - - - typical typical typical typical typical typical typical Financing: - - - - - - - cash typical typical 0.0% typical cash seller -20% Date of sale: - - - - - - - 2-21 7-21 9-21 10-21 12-21 3-22 12-22 Market conditions: - - - - - - - 0.50% -2.00% -3.00% -3.50% -4.50% -4.50% -1.50% Adjusted unit rate:

Rate per sq. ft.: $74.68 $78.17 $88.23 $92.07 $98.71 $123.43 $115.63 Subject
Comparability: Sale is: Sale is: Sale is: Sale is: Sale is: Sale is: Sale is:

General location: average inferior similar similar similar similar superior inferior Land size (sf): 96,073 superior inferior similar superior similar superior superior Best use / zoning density: MFR; 60 du/ac inferior inferior similar inferior inferior similar superior Land configuration: typical similar inferior sl. inferior sl. inferior similar similar sl. inferior Corner location / access: avg.-good inferior inferior similar similar inferior similar similar Topography: level similar similar similar similar similar similar similar Improvements/demolition: interim similar similar similar similar similar similar similar Plans/Entitlements: no similar superior similar superior superior similar superior Off-site improvements: average similar similar similar similar similar similar similar Data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
slightly
Overall comparability: inferior inferior inferior superior superior superior superior

MARKET ANALYSIS COMPARISON GRID

Page 237 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: (Continued)
3-11
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
The subject property has a rectangular land configuration. Data 2 is has an irregular land configuration and is deemed inferior, while Data 3, 4, and 7 have slightly irregular land configurations and are deemed slightly inferior.

The subject property has a corner location and overall access is rated average- good. Data 1, 2 and 5, having inside locations, are deemed inferior regarding corner location/access.

Data 2, 4 and 5 sold as entitled sites and Data 7 sold with “ready to issue” plans.

Said sale properties are deemed superior regarding plans/entitlements.

No other adjustments were warranted in the subject case.

The reader is referred to the following array of the land sale properties utilized herein. The sales are placed in order within the array by rating with respect to overall comparability, i.e. superior, similar, inferior. Based on the foregoing, the market conditions adjusted unit rates applicable to the land sale properties range from $43.84 to $88.58 per square foot of land area, as follows:

Overall Rate Per
Data Comparability SF Land
6 superior $123.43
7 superior $115.63
5 superior $ 98.71
4 superior $ 92.07
Subject - - - $ 89.00
3 slightly inferior $ 88.23
2 inferior $ 78.17
1 inferior $ 74.68

All of the sale properties were considered helpful in the analysis, however, it is noted that Data 3 is located across the street from the subject property, and is in the same zone district. The selling broker indicated, however, that the buyer of Data 3 is proposing a senior residential care facility. Further, Data 3 is deemed superior regarding market conditions (and was adjusted downward 3.0%), but is deemed slightly inferior regarding land configuration. As such, the implied rate applicable to the subject prop erty is considered to be slightly above the market conditions adjusted rate of $88.23 indicated by Data 3.

Page 238 of 448 ends

VALUATION ANALYSIS (Continued)

SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: (Continued)
3-12
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
Based on the foregoing, the unit rate considered applicable to the subject property, is estimated at $89.00 per square foot of land area, as follows:

Land Value:
96,073 SF @ $89.00 = $8,550,497.

Adjusted: $8,550,000.

FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE:

Based on the foregoing valuation, the fee simple market value of the subject property, as of March 15, 2023, is estimated at:

$8,550,000

MARKETING EXPOSURE:

The marketing exposure of a particular property is a direct function of supply and demand within a particular market segment. Generally, a higher demand results in a shorter marketing period. During the course of market research for the subject valuations, interviews were conducted with parties involved in the transactions employed in the Sales Comparison Approach. Based on said interviews, as well interviews with real estate brokers specializing in the subject market area, the marketing exposure estimated for the subject property, assuming an aggressive and comprehensive marketing pro gram, is approxi - mately 3 to 9 months.

Page 239 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

MARKET DATA

Page 240 of 448 ends

4-1
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

MARKET DATA SUMMARY

LAND VALUE INDICATORS

Page 241 of 448 ends

4-2
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 1

7935-7941 Greenleaf Avenue
Whittier

GRANTOR:

SNW Development, Inc. APN: 8141-027-015, 036
GRANTEE:

KK Properties Group, LLC LAND SIZE: 27,989 sq.ft
SALE DATE:

February 24, 2021 ZONING: R3
DOC. NO.:

309619 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level
SALE PRICE:

$2,080,000 PRESENT USE: Vacant land
TERMS:

All cash BLDG. IMPS.: None

VALUE INDICATION: $74.31 per SF land

Page 242 of 448 ends

4-3
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 2

445 South Van Buren Street
Placentia

GRANTOR:

Placentia VB, LLC APN: 346-164-22, 25, 26
GRANTEE:

LCG-Placentia, LLC LAND SIZE: 244,466 sq.ft
SALE DATE:

July 30, 2021 ZONING: HDR
DOC. NO.:

484216 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level
SALE PRICE:

$19,500,000 PRESENT USE: 139 townhomes in
construction phase
TERMS:

All cash BLDG. IMPS.: Demolished subsequent
to sale

VALUE INDICATION: $79.77 per SF land

Page 243 of 448 ends

4-4
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 3

11432 Stanford Avenue
Garden Grove

GRANTOR:

Lora L. Umphress, et al APN: 090-153-19
GRANTEE:

Threek Investments, LLC LAND SIZE: 41,778 sq.ft
SALE DATE:

September 22, 2021 ZONING: CC-3
DOC. NO.:

589096 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level
SALE PRICE:

$3,800,000 PRESENT USE: SFRs scheduled for
demolition
TERMS:

$600,000 private BLDG. IMPS.: Older SFRs

VALUE INDICATION: $90.96 per SF land

Page 244 of 448 ends

4-5
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 4

2212 East 7th Street
Long Beach

GRANTOR:

Project Verve, LLC APN: 7262-027-001, 2, 3, 16
GRANTEE:

ADC Long Beach, LLC LAND SIZE: 33,750 sq.ft
SALE DATE:

October 15, 2021 ZONING: CCA
DOC. NO.:

1559441 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level
SALE PRICE:

$3,220,000 PRESENT USE: 23 apartment units in
construction phase
TERMS:

All cash BLDG. IMPS.: Demolished subsequent
to sale

VALUE INDICATION: $95.41 per SF land

Page 245 of 448 ends

4-6
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 5

13800 Milton Avenue
Westminster

GRANTOR:

Milton Avenue 24, LLC APN: 203-311-13, 16, 24
GRANTEE:

RHF Holding Group LAND SIZE: 46,440 sq.ft
SALE DATE:

December 17, 2021 ZONING: R4
DOC. NO.:

757372 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level
SALE PRICE:

$4,800,000 PRESENT USE: Vacant land
TERMS:

All cash BLDG. IMPS.: None

VALUE INDICATION: $103.36 per SF land

Page 246 of 448 ends

4-7
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 6

1627 Beacon Street
San Pedro

GRANTOR:

1627 Beacon LLC APN: 7456-019-027
GRANTEE:

Redondo 100 LLC LAND SIZE: 20,503 sq.ft

SALE DATE:

March 31, 2022 ZONING: R3-1XL-CPIO

DOC. NO.:

358254 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively Level

SALE PRICE

$2,650,000 PRESENT USE: Vacant lot
TERMS: All cash BLDG. IMPS.: None

VALUE INDICATION: $129.25 per SF land

Page 247 of 448 ends

4-8
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
MARKET DATA # 7

16101 South Figueroa Boulevard
Gardena

GRANTOR:

Sarashaool, LLC APN: 6120-023-034
GRANTEE:

Alondra Property, LLC LAND SIZE: 20,366 sq.ft
SALE DATE:

December 20, 2022 ZONING: C2-1
DOC. NO.:

1186616 TOPOGRAPHY: Effectively level
SALE PRICE:

$3,000,000 PRESENT USE: Vacant land
TERMS:

$2,136,240 seller BLDG. IMPS.: None

VALUE INDICATION: $147.30 per SF land

Page 248 of 448 ends

DeLorme Street Atlas USA® 2015

MARKET DATA MAP
Data use subject to license.
© DeLorme. DeLorme Street Atlas USA® 2015.
www.delorme.com
TN
MN (11.4°E)
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4 5
mi
km
Scale 1 : 187,500
1" = 2.96 mi Data Zoom 10-1

Page 249 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

ADDENDA

Page 250 of 448 ends

5-1
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S
See Photo No. 1 on first page of Subject Property Description Section.

PHOTO NO. 2: View looking southeasterly at the subject
property from Stanford Avenue.

PHOTO NO. 3: View looking southwesterly at subject property from the intersection of Stanford Avenue and
Eighth Street.

Page 251 of 448 ends

5-2
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

PHOTO NO. 4: View looking southeasterly at the bank facility.

PHOTO NO. 5: View looking southeasterly at the annex building.

Page 252 of 448 ends

5-3
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

PHOTO NO. 6: View looking west along Stanford Avenue.

PHOTO NO. 7: View looking east along Stanford Avenue.

Page 253 of 448 ends

5-4
R . P . L A U R A I N
& A S S O C I A T E S

A P P R A I S E R S - A N A L Y S T S

PHOTO NO. 8: View looking south along Eighth Street.

PHOTO NO. 9: View looking north along Eighth Street.

Page 254 of 448 ends

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

COSTAR MULTIPLE FAMILY

SUBMARKET REPORT EXCERPT

Page 255 of 448 ends

ES
APPRAISERS AN, rs
Central OC West of I-5

PREPARED BY
John Laurain
Vice President
Multi-Family Submarket Report
Orange County - CA

Page 256 of 448 ends

{) CoStar ~
Overview
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family
865 (413) 4.7% 2.8%
12 Mo. Delivered Units 12 Mo. Absorption Units Vacancy Rate 12 Mo. Asking Rent Growth Orange County's government is located in Santa Ana.

The area is strategically located along several arterial freeways which provide easy access into Orange
County's primary employment nodes further south and
toward the coast.

Demand has filtered into new supply which has helped
keep the vacancy rate at 4.7%, while averaging only

3.3% over the past five years. Yet, overall demand has
been negative since the start of 2022 as household
formation has ground to a halt due to factors including high rents, persistent inflation and high interest rates.

Central OC West does have a heavy pipeline consisting
of about 1,100 units which should apply upward pressure to the vacancy rate, at least in the near-term forecast. In fact, the pipeline reached its highest level in the past decade at the start of 2023 before Park on First
delivered.

Rents are up 2.8% year over year, although rent growth
has moderated off its peak of 12.9% in early 2022.

Historically high rent growth, although since retreating, has placed further pressure on renters by necessity in
the submarket who have fewer affordable options to
choose from.

Investors have shown steady interest in the submarket
over the years. However, recently implemented rent
control in the city of Santa Ana could deter some
investors as the law mandates a rent cap of 3% annually or 80% of inflation. Similarly, rising interest rates have led many investors to show more restraint due to a
period of pricing discovery.

KEY INDICATORS
Asking RentVacancy RateUnitsCurrent Quarter Effective Rent Absorption Units Delivered Units Under Constr
Units
$2,83813.9%7,2144 & 5 Star $2,804 49 603 765
$2,3243.4%12,4853 Star $2,314 (14) 0 353
$1,7512.4%21,6001 & 2 Star $1,744 (7) 0 0
$2,2094.7%41,299Submarket $2,194 28 603 1,118
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When

4.8%3.8%3.1%Vacancy Change (YOY) 6.3% 2009 Q4 1.4% 2021 Q4 360168(413)Absorption Units 1,641 2010 Q3 (535) 2022 Q4 588201865Delivered Units 1,423 2010 Q3 0 2018 Q3
13110Demolished Units 190 2007 Q4 0 2022 Q4

2.0%3.2%2.8%Asking Rent Growth (YOY) 12.9% 2022 Q1 -5.0% 2009 Q4

1.9%3.2%2.4%Effective Rent Growth (YOY) 13.3% 2022 Q1 -5.3% 2009 Q4 N/A$245.9M$215MSales Volume $551.4M 2022 Q1 $37.3M 2011 Q4 3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 2Page 257 of 448 +--- -----t ---+
---+
Vacancy
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family
The vacancy rate has shifted by 3.0% year over year
after a net of -400 units have been absorbed in the past 12 months. Absorption fell every quarter in 2022 as
many renters have been financially squeezed out of the
submarket due to rising rents coupled with persistent
inflation and rising interest rates. Net absorption in luxury communities has been marginal year over year while it
has plummeted in 2 and 3 Star properties over that
period.

Many landlords have also noted that many renters are
reluctant to move due to concern about finding another
rental that isn't costlier. That is compelling some
landlords to try to create vacancy in their communities so that they have more room to raise rents on the vacant
unit. Looking ahead, supply additions are likely to apply further upward pressure to the rate heading in the
coming quarters.

Downtown Santa Ana continues to gentrify and add
restaurants, theaters and shops in the hope of attracting younger residents and visitors to the area. Apartment
developers have joined the fray, looking to secure
renters that are interested in the area's centrality and affordability. In addition to gentrification downtown, work is underway on the $400 million light rail project called the OC Streetcar that will connect Downtown Santa Ana
with Garden Grove, providing another outlet for residents to expand their employment opportunities when the line
opens in 2023.

The submarket also includes a few Opportunity Zones,
primarily in Downtown Santa Ana. The city hopes that
developers will be enticed to build and renovate buildings in these areas due to the federal program's tax benefits, and several investors have done so with commercial
properties.

Santa Ana passed rent control in November 2021 that
covers properties built before 1996. The rent cap is set at 3% annually or 80% of inflation on these units, whichever is less. The city was the first to pass rent control in Orange County. And while other cities throughout the
county had been considering this measure, the
deceleration in rent growth across the region has made it less of a priority. Santa Ana followed up the rent control measure with a rental registry. The registry will track available units and rent increases.

ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 3Page 258 of 448 700 Forecast 9%
600 8%
.l!l ·c 500 7%
;:)
-0
400 Cl)
Ql 6%
-~ ai 300 0
a)
z 200
""
5% ~
(")
Q)
:J
4%
(")
'<
C
0 100 .::,
e- 3%
0 (J)
.0
0 ~ 2%
-100 1%
-200 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IQ% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
■ Absorption ■ Net Deliveries ■ Vacancy Orange County Vacancy Vacancy
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family

OVERALL & STABILIZED VACANCY

VACANCY RATE
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 4Page 259 of 448 6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0% I , , ,
2017
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0% I I i
2017
I f I
2018
I I I
2018

I I I I I I I I I
2019 2020 2021
I I I
2022
: Forecast
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
2023
■ Overall Vacancy ■ Stabilized Vacancy
I I J
' ' '
I I I
2019 2020 2021
I I I
2022
1 Forecast
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
2023
I I I
2024
I I I
2024
■ Central OC West of 1-5 3 ■ Central OC West of 1-5• 4-5 ■ Central OC West of 1-5 Star Star

I I I I I I
2025 2026

I I I I I I
2025 2026
Orange County
Vacancy
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family

VACANCY BY BEDROOM
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 5Page 260 of 448 6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0% +--'--'-..,_-t-_._..,__,_-l~..,__,__.,_-t--_,__.,_..,_-+-__,,_..,__._-l~-----'-----t---'- 20117 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
■ Studio ■ 1 Bed ■ 2 Bed 3 Bed
Rent
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family
Year-over-year rent growth currently sits at 2.8%,
compared with the five-year average of 4.8%. Annual
rent growth has moderated from its historical peak of

12.9% in early 2022, following the county-wide trend as demand has fallen. Average rents have been largely flat since mid-2022.

Luxury apartments, although seeing the most consistent
demand in the past year, have seen rent growth
moderate most notably. Properties rated 1 & 2 Star will be most affected by the recently passed rent control in the city of Santa Ana because the vast majority were
built before 1995. Most 3 Star communities also fall
under that umbrella.

Median household income in Central OC West is among
the lowest in the metro. Residents with lower-than-
average incomes might be most comfortable in 1 & 2
Star and 3 Star apartments, where rent still makes up
about 35% of income. Inventory rated 4 & 5 Star in the
submarket is often out of reach for many residents,
accounting for more than 50% of a renter's household
income. This has caused many new developments to
look outside the submarket for renters, while also being more permissive of higher rent-to-income ratios than
what was seen in the past.

DAILY ASKING RENT PER SF
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 6Page 261 of 448 $2.70
$2.60
$2.50
$2.40
$2.30
$2.20
$2.10
$2.00 .............................. _ ..................................................................... _ ............................... _ __.. ............................... __.. ...................................... ........ 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
■ Central OC West of 1-5
Rent
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family

MARKET RENT PER UNIT & RENT GROWTH

MARKET RENT PER UNIT BY BEDROOM
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 7Page 262 of 448 $3,000 Forecast 14%
$2,800
01 12%
$2,600 10%
)> ::,
~ ::,
·c: $2,400
C
::J 8% !!l..
~ ;o
(1)

0... ;:!.
c $2,200 6% G) Q)
er: 0
~
$2,000
~
4%
$1,800 2%
$1 ,600 0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
■ Market Rent Growth Y/Y ■ Market Rent Per Unit ■ Effective Rent Per Unit Orange County Market Rent Per Unit
$2,800
$2,600
$2,400
$2,200
$2,000
$1,800
$1,600
- ------------1/----
$1,400
-
$1,200
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
■ Studio ■ 1 Bed ■ 2 Bed 3 Bed
Construction
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family
After a long drought in the pipeline, development activity has picked up in Central OC West of I-5 in recent years and much of it is concentrated in Opportunity Zones in
Santa Ana. All told, a net of about 1,500 units have
opened over the past five years, and roughly 1,100 units are under construction. That level, which has reached its highest level in 10 years, will apply upward pressure to vacancy as those properties begin delivering this year.

One of the largest recent projects was Park on First at Prentice Park in Santa Ana. The 603-unit property
opened at the beginning of 2023 offering one month free on 12-month leases. The property is adjacent to I-5 and is within a mile of downtown Santa Ana and the Amtrak
station. Amenities are similar to other new construction in Orange County, and it includes a gateway to the Santa
Ana Zoo. It is one of the largest communities in the
submarket.

DWS Group and Legacy Partners broke ground on the
226-unit Bloom in the southern part of Santa Ana in
early 2021. It is scheduled to open in 2023 and is within striking distance of South Coast Plaza and high-paying
jobs in Irvine, Tustin and Costa Mesa.

While not the norm, some developers are building
outside Santa Ana city limits. Bonanni Development is
building 300 units at 12736 Beach Blvd in Stanton called VRV. The low-rise project is expected to open by mid-
2023. Bonanni is also building Cloud House in Stanton.

The project will include more than 300 units. The central feature of the development is the rooftop skydeck, which is one of the largest in Orange County. Included on the sixth level of the parking structure, the expansive roof deck will be equipped with a lounge, pool and spa and
fitness studio. The project will also include ground floor leasing, co-working spaces, and multiple courtyards
throughout with its scheduled opening in 2024.

DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 8Page 263 of 448 800 Forecast
700
600
.l!l 500
·e
::)
400 .f:
1/)
(I)
-~
-~
300
"iii - -0 200
100
0 -100 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
' '
I I I i I I
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
■ Deliveries ■ Demolished ■ Net Deliveries
Sales
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family
Central OC West of I-5 is often among the top targets
for investors in Orange County, and the submarket has
averaged 66 market-rate deals annually over the past
five years. Although foreign investors have shown
interest in the submarket occasionally, sales activity is driven by local and national capital. Transactional pricing has averaged about $330,000/unit during the past 12
months, which is substantially lower than the Orange
County average. Properties typically sell at a cap rate near 4%. The average size of communities to have sold
in the past year was about 20 units.

Newly passed rent control could hinder investment in the near term, as local and middle-market investors are
interested in Santa Ana properties built in 1995 or earlier.

Similarly, rising interest rates have made investment less attractive given the cost of debt, and investment activity has taken a step back since the middle of 2022.

Investment volume has averaged $335 million annually
over the past five years, with a 12-month peak of $551
million over that period. Buyers have received an
average discount of roughly 7% off the asking price in
the past year, which is higher than historical trends.

Private local investors were involved on both ends of the sale for the Village Courtyard Apartments located at
8080 Bever Pl in Stanton at the end of 2022. The 58-
unit community sold for $19 million, or about
$328,000/unit, at a 3.2% cap rate. That was one of the
lower cap rates in recent quarters here.

During 22Q3, a private investor purchased the 15-unit
community located at 13871 Shady Ln in Garden Grove
for $7.7 million, or about $516,000/unit, at a 4.1% cap rate. There was a credit of roughly $210,000 to cover the cost of deferred maintenance. The buyer will likely
undertake a capital improvement program. The property
last sold in 2011 for $3.2 million.

A private investor acquired the 25-unit Garden
Apartments located at 7920 Trask Ave in Westminster
during 22Q2 for $9.3 million, or about $372,000/unit, at a

3.96% cap rate. The buyer was expected to improve the
units. This deal represented the seller's downleg in a
1031 exchange.

SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER UNIT
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 11Page 264 of 448 $550,000 l Forecast $300
I
I
$500,000 $250
(/)
·c: $450,000 $200
!'.I)
=> ii,
Q) "' 0 ~ ~ E
(I) $400,000 $150 3
ro (1)
en :,
Q)
:>I!. ~
ffi $350,000 $100 0
~ :,
t/)
$300,000 $50
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
■ Sales Volume ■ Central OC West of 1-5 Price/Unit ■ Orange County Price/Unit Sales
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family

MARKET CAP RATE
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 12Page 265 of 448

4.6% Forecast

4.4%

4.2%

4.0%

3.8%

3.6%

3.4%

3. 2 % -t--'1 ........ 1 __._, -+--''-' __._, -+--''-' __._, -+--''-' __._, -+--''--'-' __._, -+--''--'-' __,_, -t--''--'-' __,_, -t--''--'-' __,_, -t-.... 1 __._, _._, -t-.... ,__._, _._, -+-....... 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
■ Central OC West of 1-5 3 ■ Central OC West of 1-5 4-5 ■ Central OC West of 1-5 Star Star
Orange County
Sales Past 12 Months
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family
46 $324 $4.7 1.7%
Sale Comparables Avg. Price/Unit (thous.) Average Price (mil.) Average Vacancy at Sale

SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS

SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $1,500,000 $4,674,674 $2,750,000 $20,000,000 Price/Unit $189,928 $324,336 $309,167 $516,000
Cap Rate 3.2% 4.5% 4.3% 10.0%
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 1.7% 0% 6.8%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.3 6.3 6.4 12.0
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Property Size in Units 5 14 10 60
Number of Floors 1 1 2 2
Average Unit SF 163 823 845 2,205
Year Built 1906 1966 1963 1988
Star Rating 2.1
3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 13Page 266 of 448 )S Alamitos
~al Beach
National
Wildlife
Refuge
Pkq

NSET BEACH
Cypress Disneyland Park f
HERMOSA _

SOUTHWEST VILLAGE Q
,
EST GARDEN t t t
GROVE
- ~
BOLSA

CHICA-HEIL
@
t t ,!;l
®
Midway City

GOLDENWEST

WINTERS BU

NEWLA D
Huntington
Ctr'I Pk East

GARFIELD
®
Garden Grove
f RIVERVIEW
WEST
Mile Square
Regional Park
Fountain
Valley
I
...
s
C
***** I ** **
SOUTHEAST j

ANAHEIM

PLAT INUM

TRIANGLE
Chapman
University
9 Orange
!!/ilia Park
Grijalva Park
] 9
El Modena
~
~
,,.,,, ..... l
:I
I
Nort

SIA PILAR
' nta na
t LYO

BRISTOL / WARNER

SOUTH COAST

SOUTH COAST
METRO
, Tustin

TUSTIN LEGA CY
r

IRVINE BUSINESS WESTP ARK
COMPLEX MBp data (Q2O23 Google
~
f---
f---
***** *****
Sales Past 12 Months
Central OC West of I-5 Multi-Family

RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
Sale InformationProperty Information
RatingProperty Name/Address Yr Built Units Vacancy Sale Date Price Price/Unit Price/SF 10621 Bolsa Ave
- 1977Bolsa West Apartments1 60 0% 11/17/2022 $20,000,000 $333,333 $262 8080 Bever Pl
- 1971Village Courtyard Apartments2 58 0% 10/5/2022 $19,025,000 $328,017 $370 7932 Lampson Ave
- 1963Kwan Yin Apartments3 45 6.8% 1/17/2023 $16,785,000 $373,000 $343 10680 Knott Ave
- 1964Heritage Point4 28 0% 6/8/2022 $10,390,000 $371,071 $383 - 196313872 La Pat Pl5 30 3.3% 3/2/2023 $10,000,000 $333,333 $465 9832-9858 Acacia Ave
- 1962Acacia Villa Apartments6 24 4.2% 12/15/2022 $10,000,000 $416,666 $404 7920 Trask Ave
- 1964Garden Apartments7 25 0% 6/9/2022 $9,300,000 $372,000 $487 - 198613871 Shady Ln8 15 0% 8/15/2022 $7,740,000 $516,000 $414 - 1982502 E Pine St9 18 0% 9/28/2022 $6,215,000 $345,277 $319 - 19638361 15th St10 20 0% 9/13/2022 $5,960,000 $298,000 $480 1003 Richland Ave
- 1986Richland Apartments11 17 0% 6/27/2022 $5,500,000 $323,529 $267 - 19638361 15th St10 20 0% 5/12/2022 $5,300,000 $265,000 $427 - 19601140 S Poplar St12 20 0% 3/31/2022 $5,000,000 $250,000 $331 - 1983520 E Walnut St13 16 0% 8/30/2022 $4,975,000 $310,937 $320 - 196413784-13792 Newland14 10 0% 7/20/2022 $4,200,000 $420,000 $427 - 19871629 Civic Center Dr W15 13 0% 8/8/2022 $4,100,000 $315,384 $333 - 197813811 Cherry St16 8 0% 11/22/2022 $3,650,000 $456,250 $475 - 198115052 Ward St17 7 0% 9/7/2022 $3,425,000 $489,285 $482 - 197012551 Adelle St18 12 0% 4/1/2022 $3,350,000 $279,166 $127 - 19291408 N Broadway St19 12 0% 5/16/2022 $3,250,000 $270,833 $329 3/22/2023
© 2023 CoStar Group - Licensed to R.P. Laurain & Associates, Inc - 689455 Page 14Page 267 of 448 t *****
+ +
t *** *
+ +
t *****
t *****
t *** *
t *****
t *****
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *****
+ +
t *** *
t *****
t *****
t *****
t *****

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

ORANGE COUNTY

REGIONAL DATA

Page 268 of 448 ends

c S
APPRAISERS AN, rs
2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
8 PLACE/LAND USE

Southern California, which spans over 42,000 square miles with 209 cities and a population of over 22 million people, remains a global travel and business destination with a diverse culture and economy. Located in the heart of Southern California, Orange County neighbors nearly every county in the region, allowing access to the region’s lucrative job market and entrepreneurial business environment.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AND ORANGE COUNTY, 2020

ORANGE COUNTY HAS
8% OF CALIFORNIA’S POPULATION
BUT ONLY 0.5% OF ITS LAND AREA
799 424,040 34

LAND AREA
(SQ MILES)

PERSONS

PER SQ MILE

MILES OF

COASTLINE
CITIES
& SEVERAL LARGE

UNINCORPORATED
AREAS

Page 269 of 448 ends

\.
1mir(fAO,
NOAA. llSG.S. ·~ OpenStreet~
::onl0 i!:;,.n:ors. and the GIS User
C.omm,.ruty
~·•·, -~-_, c:::::a
-, ,-, --- -_______ ._..,

NEWPORT BEACH'
LAGU
!RVrnE
o\ 3.75 . 7.5 /I
l!/.IKE
F.©RESli
a . .
"('1•11'.I'' I .r, t-tr H.t (j ,r.,. i,1, AO, r-...QM), I)'\("; I M'11> c:0 11tnl )111t, 1•,, ,1i.11rl tM Gl5 l)~, •1 Ccmrnun ty
h

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
9 Orange County had a population of 3,228,519 in 2020, making it the sixth-largest county in the nation. After growing from a bedroom community into an economic powerhouse and then dramatically recovering from the Great Recession, Orange County faces perhaps its greatest economic challenge. While the COVID-19 pandemic may rival the Great Recession in its economic impact, Orange County’s demonstrated economic resilience, combined with its broad range of competitive advantages and industry clusters, suggests the region is well-positioned to weather these disruptions.

POPULATION DENSITY
Orange County had an average population density of 4,040 residents per square mile,

6.0 percent more than in 2010. Orange County is significantly denser than neighboring counties.

ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION PER SQUARE MILE, 2020
Source: California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit

COUNTY POPULATION PER

SQUARE MILE
Orange 4,040
Los Angeles 2,527
Riverside 339
San Bernardino 109
San Diego 797
California (Statewide) 163

Page 270 of 448 ends

2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
10 PEOPLE/DEMOGRAPHICS/DIVERSITY
ORANGE COUNTY – 6TH LARGEST COUNTY IN THE U.S.

Orange County’s population is large and growing; it is the third-largest county in California and the sixth-largest in the nation. It has more residents than 21 states, including Utah, Iowa, Nevada, Arkansas, and Mississippi.

BECOMING OLDER
Orange County’s average age continues to increase as younger populations shrink, and older populations increase in overall size. The county had a median age of 38.3 years in 2018, higher than the national average (38.2 years), which it lagged the previous year, and well above the state average (36.7 years).

NEW BIRTHS, INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION FUELING GROWTH
Natural increase – births minus deaths – has driven population growth in Orange County for decades, with population growth averaging 22,656 since 2010. While foreign immigration remains strong, averaging 15,169 annually since 2010, net migration, on the other hand, has turned increasingly negative due in large part to high housing costs. Orange County’s strong labor market, research universities, and high quality of life continue to attract immigrants from around the world. 30 percent of the county’s population was foreign-born in 2018, compared to only 6 percent in 1970.

OLDER POPULATION SET TO EXPAND
Residents aged 65 and older are the only segment of the population expected to see growth between 2020 and 2060, at which point they are projected to represent 25 percent of the county’s population.
3,222,498 3,696,326

CURRENT

POPULATION
(2020)

PERCENT GROWTH IN

POPULATION

PROJECTED

POPULATION
(2060)
15%

Page 271 of 448 ends

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
13 TOP 10 COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN, 2018
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 1-Year Estimates, Table B05006

ORANGE COUNTY REMAINS A STANDOUT IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY THE NUMBERS SNAPSHOT: ORANGE COUNTY CHARACTERISTICS COMPARED TO REGIONAL PEERS, 2020

COUNTRY FOREIGN-BORN

POPULATION
Mexico 303,392
Vietnam 157,670
Korea 75,793
China 61,238
Philippines 52,954
India 36,507
Iran 24,147
Taiwan 23,142
El Salvador 22,023
Canada 13,913
COUNTY
MEDIAN

HOUSEHOLD
INCOME

MEDIAN AGE POVERTY
LEVEL (%)
MEAN

COMMUTE TIME
(IN MINUTES)
Orange $89,759 38.3 10.5% 28.3
San Diego $79,079 36.1 11.4% 26.6
Los Angeles $68,093 36.7 14.1% 32.2
Riverside $66,964 35.8 12.7% 33.6
San Bernardino $63,857 33.6 14.9% 31.7
California
(Statewide) $75,277 36.7 12.8% 30.2
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 1-year Estimates

Page 272 of 448 ends

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
15 ECONOMY/BUSINESS COMMUNITY/LABOR MARKET
ORANGE COUNTY’S ECONOMY DEMONSTRATING RESILIENCE IN THE FACE

OF UNCERTAINTY
EVEN DURING COVID-19, OC’S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OUTPERFORMING

REGIONAL PEERS

ORANGE COUNTY INCOME AND UNEMPLOYMENT

RATE REGIONAL COMPARISON
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 1-Year Estimates, Table B19013; California Employment Development Department

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD
INCOME

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
(JULY 2020)
Orange $89,759 12.3%
Los Angeles $68,093 18.2%
Riverside $66,964 13.7%
San Bernardino $63,857 13.1%
San Diego $79,079 12.3%
California $75,277 13.7%
United States $61,937 10.5%
$89,759 $870,000
MEDIAN

HOUSEHOLD
INCOME
(2018)

UNEMPLOYMENT
RATE
(JULY 2020)

MEDIAN EXISTING

SINGLE-FAMILY

HOME PRICE
(JUNE 2020)

12.3%

Page 273 of 448 ends

0 ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
17 ORANGE COUNTY’S LARGEST EMPLOYERS WILL PLAY KEY ROLE IN RECOVERY LARGEST EMPLOYERS IN ORANGE COUNTY, 2020
Source: Orange County Business Journal, 2020 Book of Lists

COMPANY EMPLOYMENT IN

ORANGE COUNTY
The Walt Disney Co. 32,000
University of California, Irvine 24,174
County of Orange 17,365
St. Joseph Health 14,000
Kaiser Permanente 8,200
Albertsons Southern California Division 7,535
Boeing Co. 6,500
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 6,500
Walmart Inc. 6,200
Target Corp. 6,000
MemorialCare Health System 5,400
Bank of American Corp. 5,000
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. 4,998
California State University-Fullerton 4,349
Irvine Company 4,120
Home Depot Inc. 4,100
Cedar Fair LP 4,000
Children’s Hospital of Orange County 3,938
Costco Wholesale Corp. 3,915
UnitedHealth Group Inc. 3,900

Page 274 of 448 ends

2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
18 ORANGE COUNTY’S DIVERSE INDUSTRY SECTORS: MANUFACTURING

AND HEALTHCARE IN CENTRAL OC, PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL

DOMINATE IN SOUTH AND ALONG COAST
DOMINANT INDUSTRY BY CENSUS TRACT IN ORANGE COUNTY, 2020 Tied for second place nationally for its diversity of high-tech sectors, Orange County maintains a diverse mix of industry clusters, ranging from tourism and real estate to medical devices and aerospace equipment. The following table highlights industry location quotients in Orange County. Location quotients highlight how concentrated an industry is compared to the national average; a quotient of 2.5 means industry is two and a half times more concentrated in a particular region than the national average.

Page 275 of 448 ends

Dominant Industry
Manuracturlng
Professional and Techni<al Ser""'5
Healthcare
- Educatior!ill SeMres
ConstNCtlon
Administratrve Services
• Acccmrroda:lon and Food services
other Services
Real Estate
• l'laretiouslng and Transportatloo
N
0 2.5 5 10 Miles
I I I
Spatial Reference
Name: WGS 1984 Web Mercalor
Auxiliary Sphere
PCS: WGS 1984 Well Mercator
Auxiliary Sphere
GCS: GCS WGS 1984
Datum: WGS l 984

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
19 TOP ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIES BY LOCATION QUOTIENT, 2020 Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International

LOCATION

QUOTIENT
Amusement Parks and Arcades 12.60
Apparel Knitting Mills 5.57
Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing 5.47
Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing 4.92
Land Subdivision 4.82
Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing 3.99
Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing 3.20 Manufacturing and Reproducing Magnetic and Optical Media 3.11 Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing 2.99
Electric Lighting Equipment Manufacturing 2.63
Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing 2.56
Nondepository Credit Intermediation 2.47
Offices of Real Estate Agents and Brokers 2.37
Drugs and Druggists' Sundries Merchant Wholesalers 2.34 Other Investment Pools and Funds 2.30
Activities Related to Real Estate 2.24
Building Finishing Contractors 2.22
Machine Shops; Turned Product; and Screw, Nut, and Bolt Manufacturing 2.19 Apparel, Piece Goods, and Notions Merchant Wholesalers 2.18 Other Schools and Instruction 2.17
Coating, Engraving, Heat Treating, and Allied Activities 2.17 Activities Related to Credit Intermediation 2.13
Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing 2.10
Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing 2.07
Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories 2.01

Page 276 of 448 ends

2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
22 GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT AND EMPLOYMENT COMPARISON BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNTY, 2019

EMPLOYMENT PER SQUARE MILE
BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNTY, 2020

COUNTY TOTAL

POPULATION
TOTAL

EMPLOYMENT
TOTAL

REGIONAL

PRODUCT
($ IN B)

EMPLOYMENT
PER
CAPITA

GRP PER
CAPITA

GRP PER
SQUARE
MILE

EMPLOYMENT

PER SQUARE
MILE
MEDIAN

HOUSEHOLD
INCOME
Orange 3,222,498 1,850,669 $309 0.57 $95,888 $386,733,417 2,316 $89,759 Los Angeles 10,253,716 5,180,777 $784 0.51 $76,435 $193,198,620 1,277 $68,093 San Diego 3,351,786 1,757,819 $249 0.52 $74,381 $59,187,069 418 $79,079 San Bernardino 2,192,203 875,106 $94 0.40 $42,887 $4,686,643 44 $63,857 Riverside 2,440,124 860,924 $88 0.35 $36,137 $12,212,046 119 $66,964 Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International; California State University, Fullerton

Page 277 of 448 ends

Tulare County
Ventura
..,_ County
Kem County
Inyo County
San !Diego
€ouncy
Riverside
County
5-:-:~lfl'',, f •,11, llf Rf,\1o11m1n l·AO, NOJV.\ u~rn;,,:; O p ..... ShN•l"-'1p ,con tr 'Ou!O/'$, .ind the. GIS \..t?rCommv t'lit'f
Southern California Counties
Employment Per Square Mile
■
0 N
A
17 44
119
206
418
1,277
2,316
20 40 80 Miles
S~b-al Rd crcncc
Name: WGS 19$4 Web MercatQt 4u,o.llar)•
Spflcrc
PCS: WGS 1984 Web Me-cator AUll .,iari,•
Spll•· e
GCS: GCS WGS l334
Datum: WGS 1984

ORANGE COUNTY PROFILE
23 AFTER COVID PLUNGE, OCBX SEES LARGEST IMPROVEMENT SINCE

GREAT RECESSION
The Orange County Business Expectations Index (OCBX) provides the results of a survey of Orange County business executives regarding their projected future business activity. After hitting 92.9 at the start of the year, the OCBX sank to 22.7 as stay-at-home orders resulted in massive business disruptions and painted a bleak outlook. However, it jumped back to 62.9 by the third quarter of 2020; 24.3 percent of surveyed businesses expected to get back to pre- pandemic activity levels by the end of the year, while 20 percent put the recovery further out until after 2021.

ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS EXPECTATIONS INDEX, Q1 2008 – Q3 2020 AN INDEX ABOVE 50 INDICATES EXPANSION
Source: California State University, Fullerton

GROSS REGIONAL PRODUCT PER SQUARE MILE
BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNTY, 2020

Page 278 of 448 ends

100
90 80
70 60
so
40 30
20 10
0 Tulare Cour ty
Kem County
Ventura
County Los Angeles
<iounty
"!
"' ""
CXl "' ,.;
<ri"'
iiiHiill
~
a) g Ol 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 N N N N N
6 M
0 6 M
0 6
a,
0 a,
"' ;:: 0 .... "" 0 0 <D <D
0 0 5 5 N N N
6 M M 0 0
Inyo County
San D•e~o
County
San
Bernardino
Coonty
RiversKle
County
); ,, ,,. ,..,, tll lCf ...in,111 JAO 'MOM,U\fi'- . <Jp.,l'\\I" tM1, <:ontr .:i!J:or.;, aoa the CIS: 1-5-rrUlf'l"munit-,
"' .... ~ M "l 0
CI) N
oi "' ~ o:i ~ .... oi M
"'
CI) OJ tri "'
a, ~ tri
0) "'
CI) ,.; a, .... ,.,; N OJ "' OJ a, a, CI) .,; .... CI)
....
"'
.,, "' ....
0 " .... ....

M
.;
"'
I
N N M M st st
'° '°
IO <O
5 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 5 N N N N N N N N N N
6 M 6 M
c M 6 cl 6 M
0 0 0 0
"' ..;
CI)
Southern California Counties
GRP Per Square Mile
■
0 A
0) .... "' "' "' "'
,...
5 N
6 $1,422,849
$4,686,643
$12,212,046
$24,83 l,079
$59,187,069
$193,198,620
$386,733, 4 I 7
20 40
Spot.al Rd'UUIC.C
80M iles
Name: WGS 19$-1 Web M,ercator 0.U)(l!lary
"""°"' PCS· WGS 1984 1Ncb ..... c:atr.:r AU>! ·111ry
si,,,e,e
-GCS: GCS WGS l 9s,::I

0.C-,m: WGS 1964
"' "'
,-: N
N CI) .,;
"' ..; a, M N
"' "' "' o:i "' a,
..... a) a)
5 5 5 N N N
M
0 c M
0 "' "'
M
0 cri oi 'C
CI)
"
a,
a,
Ol Ol
0 5
N N
6 M
0 0)
N
"'
0 N
0 N
6 a,
<'i
""
~
I
0 N
0 N
M
0 2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ECONOMY
80 EMPLOYMENT
Orange County unemployment skyrocketed during the COVID-19 pandemic; its July 2020 unemployment rate of 12.3 percent was 9.2 percentage points higher than July 2019. While the unemployment rate has dropped from its May 2020 peak of 14.7 percent, it remains at a historically high level. The county’s July unemployment rate was 1.4 percentage points low than the state average but 1.8 percentage points higher than the national average. Over the past year, employment in Orange County has declined by 191,600 jobs to 1,384,200, with 75 percent of these losses – 144,400 jobs – occurring from March 2020 to July 2020. Total unemployment increased by 283 percent over the same time period, reaching 194,400 in July.

COVID-19 PUSHES UNEMPLOYMENT RATES WELL ABOVE RECESSION-ERA HIGHS

UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IN ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA AND UNITED STATES, 2010-2020
Source: California Employment Development Department, Bureau of Labor Statistics Orange County had 522,156 unique job postings between July 2019 and July 2020, with a median posting duration of 33 days and an average advertised of $50,000. Irvine continued to drive the demand for labor with over 125,000 job postings during the same time period, followed by Santa Ana (52,947) and Anaheim (51,529). Employers with the most job openings included University of California, Anthem, and Marriott International Inc., reflecting the county’s competitive advantages in higher education, healthcare, and hospitality.

COVID-19 slashed job postings in Orange County, with monthly job postings falling from 140,585 in July 2019 to 80,877 by July 2020. Between July 2019 and July 2020, Registered Nurses had the highest number of job postings (22,906) in Orange County, followed by Software Developers and Software Analysts and Testers (22,714).

Page 279 of 448 ends

18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15
- Orange County (12.3%) - California (13.7%)
High: 14.7%
Low: 2.4%
Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18 Dec-19
-United States (10.5%)
2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ECONOMY
82 The 10 Orange County industry clusters highlighted below account for more than half of all county employment. Together, these clusters created more than 180,000 jobs between 2011 and 2019, totaling more than 1 million jobs as of 2019.

The most significant percentage growth over the past 10 years occurred in:

Four industry clusters saw employment declines since 2011:

Between 2018 and 2019, industries with the fastest salary growth included:

All industry clusters have seen earnings improve since 2011, with the fastest growth taking place in Computer Hardware (33.5 percent) and Construction (27.7 percent).

HOSPITALITY
& TOURISM

BUSINESS &

PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES

COMMUNICATION ENERGY &

ENVIRONMENT

COMPUTER

HARDWARE

DEFENSE &

AEROSPACE
HEALTH

SERVICES

CONSTRUCTION

29.1% 29.0%
-28.5% -12.6% -2.1% -1.0%

25.1%53.7%

COMPUTER

HARDWARE

COMPUTER

SOFTWARE

ENERGY &

ENVIRONMENT

BIOMEDICAL

6.2% 4.3% 3.1% 2.6%

Page 280 of 448 ends

0 0 0
0 0 0 0

ECONOMY
83 PRE-COVID-19 DATA SHOW THAT MAJOR ORANGE COUNTY SECTORS

CONTINUED TO GROW

EMPLOYMENT AND AVERAGE SALARIES IN ORANGE COUNTY CLUSTERS WITH MORE THAN 50,000 JOBS, 2011-2019
Salaries, In Thousands
Sources:

Page 281 of 448 ends

250
200
150
100
50 100
90 80
70 60
50 40
30 20
10 2011
2011
2012 2013 2014
- Construction - Health Services
2012 2013 2014
- Construction - Health Servlces
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Tourism - Business and Profess ional Services
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Tourism - Business and Professionol 5ervlces
2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

ECONOMY
84 EMPLOYMENT AND AVERAGE SALARIES IN ORANGE COUNTY CLUSTERS WITH 50,000 JOBS OR FEWER, 2011-2019
DATA NOTES:

Average salaries have been inflation-adjusted to 2019 dollars.

Salaries, In Thousands
Jobs, In Thousands
Sources:

California Employment Development Department
U.S. Inflation Calculator, reporting Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) data provided by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.usinflationcalculator.com) Page 282 of 448 45 40
35 30
25 20
15 10
5 160
140
120
100
80 60
40 20
2011
2011
2012 2013 2014 2015
- Computer Software
-Energy and Environment
- Computer Hardware
_::::.::::==-:.
2012 2013 2014 2015
- Computer Software
-Energy and Environment
-Computer Hardware
2016 2017
- Communication
Biomedica l
- Defense and Aerospace
2016
- Com mum cation
Biomedical
2017
- Defense and Aerospace
2018 2019
2018 2019
2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

HOUSING
92 HOUSING LANDSCAPE
More than half (51 percent) of Orange County’s housing consists of single-family detached homes, the result of a trend stretching back decades; multi-unit housing accounts for only 33.7 percent of the county’s housing structures. Similar trends are seen in all peer regions except San Francisco, where multi-unit housing dominates, and San Bernardino and Riverside, which have significantly higher proportions of single-family detached housing.

MULTI-UNIT HOMES GROW IN IMPORTANCE AS SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING

SUPPLY STAYS TIGHT
HOUSING STRUCTURES BY TYPE FOR PEER CALIFORNIA REGIONS, 2020 Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State — January 1, 2011-2020. Sacramento, California, May 2020.

Orange County’s homeownership rate was largely unchanged from 2017 to 2018 at 57 percent, slightly above the state rate of 55 percent, yet below the national rate of 64 percent. White communities had the highest rate of homeownership at 66 percent, followed by Asians (61 percent) and Hispanics or Latinos (39 percent). Homeownership has a significant effect on the net worth of individuals, especially in Orange County, where residential real estate prices have seen significant appreciation.

Page 283 of 448 ends

80%
/096
60%
50%
40%
309'
20%
10%
09/, ■ I I I ■ ■ I I
San Bernardino Riverside Santa Clara San Diego Orange Los Ange les San Francisco ■ Single Detached ■ Single Attached •Two or Four Units Five+ Units • Mobile Hornes

HOUSING
93 OWNER- AND RENTER-OCCUPIED RATES OF HOMEOWNERSHIP BY MAJOR ETHNIC GROUPS IN ORANGE COUNTY, 2018

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 1-Year Estimates, Table S2502 The number of county building permits increased by 19.6 percent between 2018 and 2019, reaching an annual total of 8,989; this increase reflects the continuing demand to live and work in Orange County. While annual building permits remain well below 2016’s total, developers are building more affordable, multifamily housing units, which are crucial for keeping younger workers in Orange County.

BUILDING PERMITS BOUNCE HIGHER IN 2019
ORANGE COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT ANNUAL TRENDS, 2009-2019
Source: U.S. Census Bureau’s Building Permits Survey

Page 284 of 448 ends

600.000
535,999
500,000
34"
400.000
~
·c:
:::)
01 300,000 C
·;;;
::,
0 I
200,000
100,000
White
14,000
12,000

10.000
8,000
6,000
N
LI)
l'l. .,.
4,000
q
~
M
,,;
~
I
"1

2.000
I 0
2009 2010 2011
155,023
79,894
Hispanic or Latin Asian
• Owner -Occupied • Rente r-Occupied
M
N
N ;::: ~ N ,.._
v Q Q m
('!
en
N
co
0 <.O
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
0 u'i ai'
13,248
- 65% 35% _ ___ _
African American
en co
Ol
a5
Ill
!ii ,-.:
2017 2018 2019

HOUSING
95 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
Orange County’s median home price grew by 63 percent between June 2011 and June 2020, when it reached a new record high of $870,000. A first-time home buyer in the county would need a minimum qualifying income of $110,700 to afford an entry-level home priced at $730,150. While housing prices continue to reach new highs, the percentage of first-time homebuyers who can afford an entry-level home actually increased from 41 percent in Q2 2019 to 42 percent in Q2 2020. Despite this improvement in affordability, this level of first- time homebuyer affordability remains well below the quarterly average of 59 percent in 2011.

While the full impacts of COVID-19 on Orange County’s housing market remain to be seen, many expect to see prices softening as demand drops in the face of an economic downturn. Up to this point, however, rock bottom interest rates have kept demand levels higher, and supply remains tight, which has helped buoy prices in recent months.

While the Great Recession was caused in large part by a bursting housing bubble, the current economic downturn is unlikely to include a similarly dramatic decline in home prices.

HOUSING PRICES CLIMBED HIGHER BEFORE COVID-19 IMPACTS

MEDIAN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY HOME SALE PRICE IN
ORANGE COUNTY AND CALIFORNIA, JUNE 2011 - JUNE 2020
Source: California Association of Realtors, Current Sales & Price Statistics

Page 285 of 448 ends

$1,000.000
$900,000
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000 $534,680
/
$500.000
$400,000
$296.410
$300,000 ------=
$200,000
$100,000
$0
Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13
$870,000
$626,170
Jun-14 Jun-15 Jun-16 Jun-17 Jun -18 Jun-19 Jun-20
- California - Orange County
2020–21 ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY INDICATORS REPORT

HOUSING
98 RENTAL AFFORDABILITY
In 2020, a resident of Orange County would have to make $34.33 an hour, or $71,406 per year, in order to afford a median-priced one-bedroom apartment. This “housing wage” rose by 9.4 percent over the past year. A minimum-wage worker would need to work 106 hours per week to afford a one-bedroom apartment, 131 hours per week to afford two bedrooms, and 183 hours per week to afford three bedrooms.

While rents in Orange County have been consistently increasing for the past decade, they marked their first decline in the second quarter of 2020. Marred by increasing vacancy and regional labor market exposure to tourism-related job losses, Orange County’s average monthly rent dropped by $27 to $2,066 per month. Prior to the pandemic, rents in the region had largely plateaued due to new construction coming online. Looking forward, rent in Orange County is expected to drop further by 0.5 percent, the smallest drop among 30 metro areas. Affordability concerns were already an issue well before the current pandemic and have since only been amplified. COVID-19 will undoubtedly affect the local, regional, and national housing markets, potentially driving up rental demand as was the case during the Great Recession.

ORANGE COUNTY RENTALS SEE LARGE INCREASE IN PRICE

REGIONAL COMPARISON OF THE HOURLY WAGE NEEDED
TO AFFORD A ONE-BEDROOM UNIT, 2020
Source: Community Indicators Report analysis of Fair Market Rent data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development using the methodology of the National Low Income Housing Coalition

Page 286 of 448 ends

HOUSING
101

WITH CURRENT AFFORDABILITY RATES, RENTERS SHOULD BRACE FOR IMPACTS FROM COVID-19

ORANGE COUNTY WORK HOURS REQUIRED BY HOUSING SIZE
FOR MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS, 2020
Source: Community Indicators Report analysis of Fair Market Rent data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development using the methodology of the National Low Income Housing Coalition

LOW-INCOME RENTERS CONTINUE TO SEE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT RENT BURDEN

ORANGE COUNTY RENTER-OCCUPIED HOUSING COSTS
AS A PERCENT OF INCOME, 2018
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate, Table B25106

Page 287 of 448 ends

250
200
~
bO
::,
0 I
..Y.
0 100
3 50
0 120%
100%
Ill
u 0 80% r.

QI
"' ::,
0 I 60it.
0 .....

C QI
u
di
40%
a.
20%
0%
Minlmum Wage"' $13.00/hr
131
106
92 Zero-Beoroom One-Bedroom Two-Bedroom
~
N
a)
'/Ii.
'/Ii. ,-..
0 Less than
$20,000
$20,000 to
$34,999
$35,000 to
$49,999
Household Income
re ,-..
'#. V
-$50 .000to
$74,999
183
Three-Be droom
$75,000 or More
212
Four-Bedroom
Hou~ehol<;I
Spending
•Lessman 20%
• 20% to 29%
30% o, More

R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

QUALIFICATIONS
OF

APPRAISER

Page 288 of 448 ends

c S
APPRAISERS AN, rs

1 R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS

BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS

John P. Laurain, MAI, ASA
Certified General Real Estate Appraiser
California Certification No. AG 025754

PRESIDENT:

R. P. Laurain & Associates, Inc.
3353 Linden Avenue, Suite 200
Long Beach, California 90807
Office: (562) 426-0477 - Fax: (562) 988-2927
[email protected]

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION AFFILIATIONS:

The Appraisal Institute
MAI Designated Member

American Society of Appraisers
Senior member; hold professional endorsement and
designation “ASA” in urban real estate.

American Arbitration Association
Associate arbitrator in title insurance matter.

Certified General Real Estate Appraiser by the
Office of Real Estate Appr aisers, State of California.

Certification No. AG 025754.

APPRAISAL BACKGROUND:

Real estate appraisal and valuation consultation services conducted for public purposes include eminent domain studies, street widening and grade separation (bridge) projects, public school and university expansion projects, relocation studies, housing and public loan programs, Navy housing, senior housing, public bond measures, leasing of publicly-owned properties, Quimby Act park fee studies, Fair Political Practices Commission analyses, budgetary studies, and transfers (exchanges) of properties between public agencies. Private real estate appraisal services have been conducted for lending institutions, insurance companies, attorneys, estates for tax and donation purposes, private subdivision development studies, and other private uses.

Page 289 of 448 ends

BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS (Continued)

APPRAISAL BACKGROUND: (Continued)
2 R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS
Residential Property:

Residential properties appraised incl ude single family, condominiums, own- your-own, townhouse, low and medium density multiple family, 100+ unit apartment complexes, waterfront properties, boat docks, mobile home parks, vacant single-family lot and acreage parcels, and low to high density vacant land parcels.

Commercial and Industrial Property:

Commercial property appraisal studies have included single and multi-tenant retail, strip centers, shopping centers, low-rise and high-rise office buildings, medical offices, restaurants and fast -food developments, nightclubs, con- venience stores, theaters, automobile repair and service facilities, service stations, truck fueling and washing stations, car wash facilities, automobile sales, mixed-use properties including single resident occupancy (SRO) developments, as well as hotel and motel properties, and vacant land.

Industrial property appraisals have included warehouses, light and heavy manufacturing, distribution and transit facilities, food processing, cold storage, lumber yards, recycling centers, open storage, vacant land, remnant and landlocked parcels, properties encumbered with oil and water injection wells, sites with soil contamination and land fill properties.

Special Purpose and Special Use Properties:

Appraisal services and valuation studies of public, quasi-public, special use, and nonprofit facilities include, among others, seaport properties, airport properties (FBO, hangars, warehouse, office, land, etc.), submerged land, river rights-of- way, reservoirs, agricultural land, conservation/mitigation and wetland properties, utility and railroad rights-o f-way, flood control channels, city hall buildings and civic center complexes, courthouses, libraries, fire and police stations, post offices, public parking structures, parks, public and private schools, adult learning centers, athletic facilities and gyms, bowling alleys, tennis centers, youth homes, after school facilities, daycare facilities, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, churches, meeting halls and veteran facilities.

Valuation Methodologies:

In addition to the three conventional valuation methods (Sales Comparison Approach, Cost-Summation Approach, and Income Capitalization Approach), valuation methodologies have included discounted cash flow analyses, leased fee, and leasehold analyses, absorption discounts, deferred maintenance, cost- to-cure, bonus value, excess rent, acro ss-the-fence, value-in-use, fractional interests, hypothetical valuations, and reuse studies.

Page 290 of 448 ends

BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS (Continued)

APPRAISAL BACKGROUND: (Continued)
3 R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS
Property interests appraised for eminen t domain purposes include full and partial takings, as well as severance damage and project benefit studies.

Valuation of various types of easements have included permanent surface, street, temporary construction, slope, utility, pipeline and subsurface, aerial, bridge structure, signal light, exclusive and nonexclusive surface rights, multi- layered, battered pilings, tie-back, railr oad, drainage ditch, and flood control easements.

Clients:

Real estate research, analysis and appraisal services performed on projects for various public agencies and private corporations while associated with R. P. Laurain & Associates, Inc., since 1986. Following is a partial list of public agencies for which appraisal services have been provided:

Cities:

City of Alhambra
City of Anaheim
City of Artesia
City of Arvin
City of Azusa
City of Baldwin Park
City of Bell
City of Bell Gardens
City of Bellflower
City of Beverly Hills
City of Brea
City of Buena Park
City of Burbank
City of Carson
City of Cathedral City
City of Chino
City of Chino Hills
City of Compton
City of Corona
City of Covina
City of Cudahy
City of Cypress
City of Diamond Bar
City of Downey
City of El Monte
City of El Segundo
City of Garden Grove
City of Glendale
City of Hawaiian Gardens
City of Huntington Beach
City of Huntington Park
City of Industry
City of Inglewood
City of Irwindale
City of Laguna Beach
City of Laguna Woods
City of Lakewood
City of La Mirada
City of Lawndale
City of Long Beach
City of Los Alamitos
City of Los Angeles
City of Monrovia
City of Montebello
City of Monterey Park
City of Newport Beach
City of Norwalk
City of Oceanside
City of Ontario
City of Palmdale
City of Palm Springs
City of Paramount
City of Pasadena
City of Perris
City of Redondo Beach
City of Riverside
City of Rosemead
City of San Juan Capistrano
City of San Marino
City of Santa Ana
City of Santa Fe Springs
City of Seal Beach
City of Signal Hill
City of South El Monte
City of South Gate
City of Tustin
City of Upland
City of West Hollywood
City of Whittier

Page 291 of 448 ends

BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS (Continued)

APPRAISAL BACKGROUND: (Continued)
4 R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS
Other Public and Quasi-Public Agencies:

Alameda Corridor Engineering Team
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority
California High Speed Rail Authority
Caltrans
Castaic Lake Water Agency
Hawthorne School District
Kern County
Long Beach Community College District
Long Beach Airport
Long Beach Unified School District
Long Beach Water Department
Los Angeles County Department of Beaches and Harbors
Los Angeles County Chief Executive Office
Los Angeles County Internal Services Department
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles County Public Works
Los Angeles Unified School District
Los Angeles World Airports
Lynwood Unified School District
Orange County Transportation Authority
Orange County Public Works
Orange County Counsel
Port of Hueneme
Port of Long Beach
Port of Los Angeles
Riverside County Transportation Commission
San Bernardino County
Southern California Edison
State of California, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy U. S. Department of the Navy
U. S. Postal Service

Other:

Various attorneys, corporations, lending institutions, and private individuals.

Gold Coast Appraisals, Inc.:

Associate appraiser, as independent contractor, during portions of 1991 and 1992, specializing in appraisal of single family residential through four-unit residential properties.

Page 292 of 448 ends

BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS (Continued)
5 R. P. LAURAIN
& ASSOCIATES

APPRAISERS - ANALYSTS
EXPERT WITNESS:

Qualified as an expert witness in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Central District.

Qualified as an expert witness Orange County Superior Court.

Qualified as an expert witness in an arbitration matter before Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services in the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange.

Provided testimony as an expert witness in conjunction with eminent domain matters before the San Bernardino and Riverside County Superior Courts.

ACADEMIC BACKGROUND:

Cypress Community College - Basic curriculum.

Long Beach Community College - Basic curriculum.

Real estate and related courses taken through and at various Community Colleges, Universities, the Appraisal Institute, and business schools, in accordance with the Continuing Educ ation Requirements of the State of California, as follows:

Fundamentals of Real Estate Appraisal
Appraisal Principles and Techniques
California Real Estate Principles
Real Estate Appraisal: Residential
California Real Estate Economics
Basic Income Capitalization Approach
Advanced Income Capitalization Approach
Advanced Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use
Advanced Applications
Advanced Concepts and Case Studies
Quantitative Analysis
Eminent Domain and Condemnation
Complex Properties
Real Estate Escrow
California Real Estate Law
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
Federal and State Laws and Regulations
Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book) Valuation of Conservation Easements

Page 293 of 448 ends

Agenda Item - 7.b.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: Amir El-Farra
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Police Chief
Subject: Authorization to participate
with the Organized Retail
Theft Prevention Grant
Program from the California
Board of State and
Community Corrections.
(Grant Amount: $1.3
million) ( Action Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
To obtain City Council approval to apply for the California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) Organized Retail Theft Prevention (ORT) Grant. The City is eligible to receive up to $6,125,000, and the total amount being requested is approximately $1,302,231. The funds are designed to combat organized retail theft, motor vehicle and motor vehicle accessory theft, and cargo theft.

BACKGROUND
The California Board of State and Community Corrections Organized Retail Theft Prevention Grant Program (the Program) is established in 2022 with the passage of the State Budget Act (Assembly Bill 154, Chapter 43, Statutes of 2022). The Program provides $242,250,000 million for city police departments, sheriff departments, and probation departments to support local law enforcement agencies in preventing and responding to organized retail theft, motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessory theft, and/or cargo theft.

DISCUSSION
Eligible activities under the Program are categorized into three “Program Purpose Areas” (PPA). Grant funding request can be in one or multiple PPA’s.

PPA 1: Organized Retail Theft
For the purposes of this PPA, eligible activities, strategies, or programs, include but are not limited to:

Programs that promote collaboration and coordination between law enforcement and retailers to reduce organized retail theft.

Page 294 of 448 ends

•
Programs that promote collaboration and coordination between law enforcement and District Attorney Offices to prosecute organized retail theft.

Development of organized retail theft policies and procedures, memorandum of understanding (MOU), and/or formal agreements between law enforcement and retailers.

Deployment of law enforcement officers and taskforces to combat organized retail theft.

Use of proactive approaches to minimize organized retail theft risks (e.g., anti- theft devices, use of cameras and security systems).

Use of databases, equipment, software, and technology to combat organized retail theft.

PPA 2: Motor Vehicle or Motor Vehicle Accessory Theft
For the purposes of this PPA, eligible activities, strategies, or programs, include but are not limited to:

Investigations of motor vehicle and motor vehicle accessory theft.

Motor vehicle theft prevention public awareness campaigns.

Programs that deter motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessory theft.

Use of databases, equipment, software, and technology to track stolen motor vehicles and/or motor vehicle accessories to combat organized retail theft.

PPA 3: Cargo Theft
For the purposes of this PPA, eligible activities, strategies, or programs, include but are not limited to:

Investigations of cargo theft.

Programs that promote collaboration and coordination between law enforcement and commercial cargo operators (trains, truck, busses, etc.) to reduce organized cargo theft.

Programs that promote collaboration and coordination between commercial cargo operators and District Attorney Offices to prosecute organized cargo theft.

Use of databases, equipment, software, and technology to prevent and track stolen cargo.

The Garden Grove Police Department is focusing the grant application on PPA 1 and PPA 2 (Organized Retail Theft and Motor Vehicle or Motor Vehicle Accessory Theft).

The funds being requested are for 80 Flock License Plate Reader (LPR) cameras, 6 Flock LPR Mobile cameras, and to fund monthly directed enforcement operations related to PPA 1 and PPA 2. The total amount being requested to fund these items is approximately $1,302,231. Information regarding this program is available at California BSCC: https://www.bscc.ca.gov/organized-retail-theft-grant-program

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Authorizing the grant application will allow the Garden Grove Police Department to submit its application to the Program. Depending on the amount approved by the Program, an appropriation up to the requested amount of $1,302,231 shall be added to the Police Department’s operating budget, offset by the corresponding grant revenue. There will be no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Supplanting is strictly prohibited for all BSCC grant funds.

Page 295 of 448 ends

•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
• •
•
•

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Authorize the Garden Grove Police Department to apply for the California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) Organized Retail Theft Prevention Grant Program in the amount of $1,302,231.00;
Designate the Garden Grove Police Department as the Lead Public Agency (LPA) for the grant application and grant operations on behalf of the City; Approve to appropriate the amount equivalent to the Program funds awarded to the City of Garden Grove Police Department for the purchase Flock LPR cameras and to fund related enforcement operations for the duration of the grant period; and Authorize the Finance Director to issue purchase orders for the procurement of the Flock LRP cameras and related equipment.

By: Sergeant Willie Holloway

Page 296 of 448 ends

•
•
•
•
Agenda Item - 7.c.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: John Montanchez
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community Services
Subject: Award a contract to Jon
Gilmer Construction for the
Magnolia Park Improvements
City Project No. S-1311.
(Cost: $557,940.) ( Action
Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to award a contract to Jon Gilmer Construction for the Magnolia Park Improvements City Project No. S-1311.

BACKGROUND
The Magnolia Park Improvements City Project No. S-1311 is part of the capital improvement priorities outlined in the 2019 Parks and Facilities Master Plan. In November 2022, the City Council approved the request to issue a purchase order for Innovative Playground Company, Inc., for the purchase of new playground equipment at Magnolia Park through the Sourcewell competitive bid program, Contract #010521-BUR. Following this approval, staff processed the purchase order for the new playground equipment that will be installed by the selected contractor for this city project bid.

DISCUSSION
Staff solicited bids for this project pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.52.010.

Seven (7) bids were received and opened by the City Clerk's office at 11:00 a.m. on Monday, June 19, 2023. Staff reviewed the bid documents submitted by the lowest qualified contractor, Jon Gilmer Construction, with a total bid of $557,940. This bid amount is within the current project budget. The licenses and references of the contractor have been reviewed and verified by staff, and all other documentation is in order.

The major components of the project includes, installation of said playground, rubberized play surfacing, demolition and replacement of picnic shelter, demolition and replacement of perimeter pool fencing, and concrete work for new exercise equipment, as well as ADA compliance paths of travel.

Page 297 of 448 ends

The anticipated contract schedule is as follows:

Award Contract - June 27, 2023
Begin Pre-Construction- July 19, 2023 (estimated)
Complete Construction- Late Fall 2023 (estimated)

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The amount of $117,754.33 will be funded by the Prop 68 Per Capita grant, and the remaining amount of $440,185.67 is included in the Community Services 5-year Capital Improvement budget funded by Citywide Park Fee and Park Fee funds.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Award a contract for City Project No. S-1311 to Jon Gilmer Construction for the Magnolia Park improvements in the amount of $557,940; and

Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City, and make minor modifications as appropriate.

By: Mark Freeman, Recreation Division Supervisor
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
Magnolia Park Layout 6/21/2023 Backup Material L-2_plans_wth_labels.png Magnolia Park New Shelter 6/21/2023 Backup Material Shelter_cover_page.png Playground Rendering
w/Orange in PIP 6/21/2023 Backup Material Magnolia_Park_Playground_3.jpg Playground Rendering
Front View 6/21/2023 Backup Material Magnolia_Park_Playground_4.jpg

Page 298 of 448 ends

•
•

Page 299 of 448 ends

CQ:,i~TRUCTION CALLOUT$
0 ~::t:.:~~~:i::,r::~
1 ~~
f()LJ~ C:OWfJilHi, WOOCL • IIOR.a"a~f"10f °fl"l'l! ,..._l!J;td. ~C::':=:J f.:f
<»'1 T..cl1W~ll\.4~1)14LOJO,, N~
(1 1'►71~('!!Aet'f::V~•fl)f0,l.ll!j
IIERJllf'O Wff.f-lil;T-PJ.Ki. ~ Ui."TI\ILS~ UTM
FOltAoo,nl)'t,lr,Ll"l~TDf
Hl>n: 00Hfl-t.llCTCA9""'-1. l!c~UMll.OCA l. A"IO
'O'll ll1r'T".....ca!l',1Li T f;,l" .. t:, 1cSt<nllJl ~Sln. ~lntc:tn' 1lfPA(~f .llTl"°l'fl~t0 fl)W. l"ISf.A,.IJl"TIQ1
0 ='!.!';=:~.::;:::~ ..... ~
MCUTAQ.UAt«:ll~~ t'l,fOYATI.Cl'\A~Dt-.'tO
9JMXEC0t#'A .. t.S C0'1TACt!VA1 EIM..AAtOISl!,Kl~
'4;,r1•; ~~l()III~ TtWQl""1'1Uoll!ClO!; .llft..,,,..O\'l: .. !Y l'I.Joc;(Ml'"H et'Al t PV.Yl':Qf..lH,lll'JH iltlMWll':T"70' 1'",IO'ml'f NlrH crrv ll,E1R£.Ulf'Al1VE Mtllltto f tW..~AllAll:>M AIRlt to l'f)t:,rfAIIY'f: ,V.Y~OlAl"OUT W,;'fllll>i,S , ... i Dll2t£1,, 011,w,~i,\~ n,l>Hll(l..U: 1 ~•
© =~~~i;:=:'.,,":.,~~=Wl;111tn rAvt-.,.,4111
S'!"-IW rffOIIIIO!W'"ll <M!lltto\«M•ACttOW ~ .

Fl ~l9HIO!El .JOHTeAOOMFU !lH
'4:,rr ; ,....: i l~ AJIDl'l$11,1,1,'-'81~5":col;l0Utll.SAT 1'0.C', .. ~IQTOUf'I IIIIILU~~AIJ.t,f!WJOD Pllln
~=::r 'IOmot l'i T£.IIUU. "'81W.'M',t,C.n."'1:A
:M.4:>a.O'I PLM 1U11Urtr• arQ~fU:; A)l:)( .. DP(ltlTI
:::;::•tar~IAl..f'OK N l 1Al.LO)
0 = :.,:tf=•~~~ ... y~~CPEtl PAVJIG .... TII
rEB.Jll:D m !IIICli:WE!'ll OI/Elt..,..~AC fEl>(:Jo.81.d!!. tH IOH IOIO ~IT ~rt l ll"
nare~ ~l31' .. 'ID l'ISTALLIJ!IIEOW111EM8'£EOOO\ll'EUIJ, 1 2' 0.C. !l'ACIIO T0 £1QRE LE.'lan+~ ALL NeWTODMll t-tl
CO'IClttl& ftA'•l10 mm H l [llfM:I, Nl'II ilMIIU'M: liADII a•~CIJl:,,'lttL
St'Mll. O!I l'lN4 RIEfRESEtn H<llt-r lNONOE-.:> l'CINrS Ct_, .-t.1.:,Wflll.l..ll...,_ 1oa. tt111ou.t.u
tclOC l"i.lo il'G:fl,,,t
© ~~~~~'f~==~~~D
~ "'GtG'.M."'91W.""~$A '\IOl l:«IIEl'l~"'I~
00!.fPloCTitO a.\SE in> ;~cm;Rnor:iRECf!rA11Q'l"1. 91.ill'ACES =~~~~=;;:im~ i.&)tJll:..~wi,"
MOWAn: 3r tcal ND10'D WAt"'TERGRCI.EOO'.O'l:,w~•JWT
CAAltc::EtftN..1';IOl.'t.l flol.lll""""'!!C atl!!Ut
s,u1t1AI •&HNT\•',
© :!:::x.AAlcx::.~~~~-=~E~~~~'At~:i-: ..... ,
1 "¢W~IVAi,. \.l.Y W.11,#Jl(;tl,lil0.

Mf •r'l--:,r,v •ffP:'?t!!e"' ?!W I
...ooti-.c: 11l1.1t,i:1; ti.\1U1111•tHU.acna1>~ • 11G1nl'~ $ VI•; f' •O'IG(t)AOAQOWl~ l.ul! ..... 0?11, 14.1twt:lo ""TTEJiH1'UJl,l'OPEJIFORlo"lO'I OOl.OAJ .l.E
0 f".lotll.lC-.~AHONITN.LH~AA •Ttoto<OQn t10Wl\er.lJ<A
r Ltl.fl.H:l!'lol11'!rtOsq l~l tllli'OTCf'M DCll~IIOl"IOtil - 110!1111~~1.SNfoVI Ml!(:.Ai..,t00:TS ,-Cl;lU..:T0 11 n,A'I' ll>G'f. -1181i0£Jjl,I C6 E5HEn L~ F<ll't~~ E UIMJfiffl li © ~~::1~111~~:~~=~1~~~ .:-~=-
!0"TIM""''° ' M()(IA Jl. l :M") 'IOT(:CIA'IQllw.LK!
Olm'INIID Of'l!Je1Q, BlU' Q.(ll!Uf:.,leU' U.ICH10 A)D !tJ.J' l.00( tfC,vfl> wn AU roa. INltfYll"t~cn.ai toa
fU.ftv()( ,lfl DfT~llO .. l<Mlt~,tl.
0 ~1~=:~1:-~~~~ ~'=~l0TM
ftOOOl"Dt lM N O~AM:rl'ltN.c:o.Oft l -ONlll.Alll.AO(
SE£ 00.A LS O & H et&t B.
@ ===-~~~~=~•A 'fllJ
® ==J~~ l~~::~~==:i:.

IIT:STcc,.ii 11~ l"ISIA1.1.l~04:; 1,u,.,.vt11"'1~11.M1.t11t w CCI J01Nt•Mi1t'10,C,,1, '"°"" Mil.f'~OIIC [ 'I,
@ ::i~~wt~.~;~'":.~": t~W~~ Al:OIOC
U~"..'IO 'l'lO'IO~AQ!:~M~ ~
SEEDE'U L f &EETL-6
@) ~'.fc':.:~~::~e1a:;:~~~~~~~
TOC:ii~ QfCEl. l'IO.M TolU.OO"ltNilia.fetll ):lo..PIJ1.1'101f 'i'l.llM LOCl(!l-f;COY~ltN Qlt"5.SAlltAA1UX: .. t11)14HCM'l 0PI f'U.'I, N:>fE; CO'IO-.Ji lJ<N..l.!E N&TAUE:>;a~Oi.l~I'
n£C:TRl~OOCE{CEC\
@ :=::~1~~~~TE~=='V\I U,
"'ii.fC".U::-,l>ai: """"MilN.~ 0RwiTOt£\IAl).ll,( li),r o:;,,,fCM"'I '-'VtlU.MA-11111C!-.-:N:.vtSL ~ Nit.CASI
:RZ!:; lt'XJ6" 9011;'-'XIB..; ~rff.lCC'l"EFI ; ~
OIIMJE'tC't'Al'HlQIJ fDFOl.t.U
Hulltlfi.AS&iifll.f&.:Al-,lit.CT"~coot.fCK)
!t:>n ; AJ.l': Xi;lr4dHECm CM.Wfl r G
A'\1000N)lll1'8tWJ.RDIM ~•P!IO'TECTN Pl.ACE.

NI IALlffA4L1. t.1ACfflCALCOCII.M:a.l~ ...

Ht>Trl &EC!/Ri Mll-!Vflt,J. lo.'«>IOlilsnw'.sN Q I.AOl()tl tWO -otSl, OAASS CO'iCMUl.....,~ U Ol'Ut MI.PiUI JCIIM.ll.lf'lC "ICAI~ PROlt:Cl [!I.PlACI - N:nt:;eotr.RIIC~ 9...u. rt:~STNCl:lOC, o't:A'ID
'ol:~IFYl'UiC011£.'lrOIFl"DIIC T"81.&18ElfCMQ O'Efl'Eff llH ~l"l'IIIIHUL'flA ~ Vll'fltOftlOF H.lll..tf'l't~'l1~ DIST, I.J~, ~ ,_ __ ~r:.s m1P
DO
,..._ PAYI"" _,di
- E:QST, ~'
CONCllf'TI!!
PA'1~G-
New pool
perimeter fencing
"'--
c-
~m.UT1ll'T'Y
•-DIST,
'""'
r'=oox ---£( t.J. GRASS
--S:1$1. GAA$$
PAOTECl IN F'VoCE-
0:191'. UtlLlf'W 0)
EIB::. BOX:J?'
- 1:xSSt .

CONCOFT< PA\1N8--
----EXIST.GAASS
PR011.~f l, l"l,.,l,OE-

PFIOTECT IN NACE-
EXIST.

TRAILER

BUILDING
New playground and
fitness equipment Pl~ ADJACENT TO
'<CNOONCflctr t A',l.'13 C00a
RJfWSHJ,J,IIJINSTAU.t.CW
$CtlC0iu..£ 40f'I ~&
l(C'll ~ lt:R l,lQoll&SS
,'t!!7'1 fDODl'f'lt.AC:TOII'!
... -l'\.a.lG-.'-TI'COl'l:;;uq:irn11 :.11c5'1Al.la .!1!!,Fta_t;; ••iOCH$lOlHE ~ WWl'tOPOOlA>IDICtl:POOLrATIO~~
ntlt.c:o,(1'M:;'f~K liii#O"ISl!Ui .-...o'1lT rOflAT t1MU:,£t-r]L ACAL.I Qlai j,\ ,t.JO.,U)(;:ALMJ l,,ll~ cx;ttipjeo-.J,.r ( TSl'.;;l.l'llrf'r J:ffi{;E •~ GATH • RCUIII> ll<llOIT R E • -r.M'IGPOOl.llt AU.

Tt.'U l).IHl-4-) ~,ROJ cCT L'ffl:. m ALCOli!,.n~ .
• • IRJll:N~Ali l)~UllU""Q;lUC~W,'fDI W.5
lQJFt.'fHJ-">O~TOl '10lAU.Ml0KQINP«l!' \ll(J~
, ll'IIC 9'Wlf.SI-.CTUN:f'\l:tl:..,._'lJ~ACTVq loMW1oCl~CA·JON! rt•l"OIIQQ!olCOW'A"IY, ilQltAC;t..'l;'f~OE0,1,1,1.t
tar A rlO' l'OflUP ROlOAS ,
CN(Q(VN.VCS& ~125
llllPt.£ S.wlNG JONJS
s
,,;
~ '"'" \_ ,.,._ Sl.ltlrf'ACl!i::)\ ~
'
----e! ISl , GiRASS
PAOTtC'T IN rv.cc-
•
I
'
-liX ISJ,GltASS
Ptl!OffC'l' NP\.ACE -
,1 ~ ~~~:o:~AH>
01\US ADJoliCE.~T 10 .ILLPA\'1'1(1
eooes OAUAOEO PA; TO
CONSTAUCIK>N,
0 L,,osr.un,ITY
EL£C,BO X
C.Alll ~IJM,._'IO""°""Ot:loU.. ~IIICOJCn """Tl~~
AJt) L.UaltfO l:1:SI.IIJ.t.NJ) SIECLMl'IC.-.~U!I.SJIII"~ ,-W.'1UJ'IIC~l!'Cal ,:,0.11l>"ti ...-YII--~ ,
fC)lt~AIIMl)l,'(DIQI.MLt ,

0.~13NA'IOPIIOolltfll.-.U P'tliOtJLY.:U W."f(A~,EOl.lf"!,IO,r .uo 1>JCRrQ11~....,o ru1A\~ o1H>~AU.Cf'Y
#I0.10!011'VVK.fJ~ll"E.lltlYIT9dMA.t8'!.'I04£1""""
IIKlef"[ito.flNp.!!; y.:t~ Mlt Y~i llolrCT\MBIS
~ QIICA~Sff t4't0YA"Tl\ll:""'l'G~a:Nf'Hf'"' '11>
IIIAl<!CXA/f'Nt/,'IO'fflrlEMIUS''[l)MOrl'l!Hof.VI.A"i~TID ARl":ll'AI.OEi.llERl'O..TEOP.J U.Y~Y.:3
~OIF : TR IOA
\'t:RWV AAO ITNCE LOC.Afli I',! l HD
~l!;LO 41.LUTll.lrYtlNeS
INa.u:l lNO 1?-0'/ 8.FCTFICAI
wlflt'IIO AHO COMIUIT lf',ES ~OA
TO l!\"STAU.ATION OF t.EWPA\'Nll,
Pl.AV QROUM) E0UP).iE.lf'I' Ate>
F1C,."<1ICS~. LJ
OUST. ,.
0 EXIST.

PARKING LOT
NO ff: PAAKN(i LOT JW"ROYlMENlS
!0 8E ftEA stPAo.a.rtPAOJECt 8Y
O' NE:El lt-E ctTY P,Uijlt C W()A($ DEPA!UMEh'T,
20'
.-
SCA~ 1''=10'
CONCRE"IE

MAGNOLIA STREET

CRYOF GAROENGROYE
:UA.Ch'Ol~ PARK
GARDCN GROVE. CA 9284 I
11401 MAGM>1.i,,.s ntE£T
DIG Al.ER'!
~ ___ , __

OATE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PLAN
05-11)-23

Page 300 of 448 ends

-·---·-' ----....... . . ~.,._, __ ...,
~::~ -·-
~ r-r:

STO~~
• l'fl!IO,C,0,, (10~
,,.".QiF;;..,.
....._-
:i=:.=c, L
Frame & Roof Finish Technical Data
---.... -·-···-,,.,,,--- ... -,.. ..... -._-
polgon·
1'11WW.f!Ollgotl.«imlt1151NJ500

DATE PICNIC SHELTER CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
02--0S-23

Page 301 of 448 ends

Innovative
PLAYGAOUNDSco.

Burke
PLAY THAT MOVES YOU.

BCIBURK.E.COM • 600.ZGG.12'!>0

Page 302 of 448 ends

Burke
PLAY THAT MOVES YOU.

BCIBUllKE.COM • 800.2GG.l2!>0
3D Designer: Rachel
Innovative
PLAYGAOUNDSco.

Agenda Item - 7.d.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: William E. Murray
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Public Works
Subject: Approval of a Cooperative
agreement with the City of
Santa Ana for the
Westminster Avenue
Rehabilitation Project from
Newhope Street to Harbor
Boulevard. (Cost:
$550,000) (Action Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For City Council to approve a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Santa Ana and the City of Garden Grove for the Westminster Avenue Rehabilitation Project from Newhope Street to Harbor Boulevard (CP-1196273).

BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Ana is preparing a rehabilitation project for Westminster Avenue from Newhope Street to Harbor Boulevard and has offered to improve the City of Garden Grove’s portion. Approximately one-sixth of the work lies within the City of Garden Grove.

The City of Santa Ana is preparing a rehabilitation project for Westminster Avenue from Newhope Street to Harbor Boulevard and has offered to improve the City of Garden Grove’s portion. Approximately one-sixth of the work lies within the City of Garden Grove.

This proposed agreement is for construction costs and construction administration of Garden Grove's portion of the project. The City of Santa Ana is serving as lead agency.

DISCUSSION
Staff has reviewed the plans, specifications, and construction estimate of the project, and verified the location of Garden Grove's portion. The project cost for City of Garden Grove’s portion is estimated at $550,000.

Page 303 of 448 ends

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The Westminster Avenue Rehabilitation Project from Newhope Street to Harbor Boulevard is included in the Fiscal Year 2023-24 adopted Capital Improvement Plan budget and are funded by Gas Tax Funds.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the City of Santa Ana, in the amount of $550,000, for the Westminster Avenue Rehabilitation Project from Newhope Street to Harbor Boulevard (CP-1196273); and

Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, and make minor modifications as appropriate thereto, on behalf of the City.

By: Nick Hsieh, P.E., Associate Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:

Description Upload Date Type File Name
AGREEMENT 6/6/2023 Agreement
6-
2023_COOPERATIVE_COST_REIMBURSEMENT_AGREEMENT__(CSA-
GG).pdf

Page 304 of 448 ends

•
•

COOPERATIVE COST REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
WESTMINSTER BOULEVARD (NEWHOPE ST. TO HARBOR BLVD.) STREET REHABILITATION

PROJECT

COOPERATIVE COST REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this ____ day of _____________, 2023, by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city (“Santa Ana"), and the CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, a California municipal corporation ("Garden Grove"). In this Agreement, Santa Ana and Garden Grove may each be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS:

WHEREAS, Santa Ana has initiated a street rehabilitation project (the "Project") to improve the street condition of Westminster Blvd. from Newhope St. to Harbor Blvd; and

WHEREAS, Westminster Boulevard within the Project limits contain a portion of property within Santa Ana and a portion of the street within the boundary of Garden Grove; and

WHEREAS, In an effort to efficiently utilize Garden Grove resources, Garden Grove wishes to improve the portion of Westminster Boulevard within its boundary at the same time the Santa Ana Westminster Boulevard Project is conducted; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to improve Westminster Boulevard, within their respective boundaries, as part of the "Project".

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing Recitals, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by all Parties, the Parties agree as follows:

1. The City of Santa Ana will advertise for bids, hire a contractor, approve the work and administer the contract for street rehabilitation.

2. Garden Grove is responsible for:

(a) Garden Grove shall pay Santa Ana for the actual cost of the work within the Garden Grove portion based upon unit prices bid of the Successful Contractor and quantities actually used on the Garden Grove portion as set forth in the Project Location Map (Exhibit A) and the City Cost Sharing (Exhibit B), attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. Garden Grove will remit payment to Santa Ana within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice evidencing Project work performed within Garden Grove city boundary.

(b) Garden Grove shall pay Santa Ana for the actual cost of design engineering and construction engineering services provided for the work within the Garden Grove portion based upon the time spent by Santa Ana staff. Garden Grove will remit payment to Santa Ana within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice evidencing Project work performed within Garden Grove city boundary.

3. Garden Grove will coordinate the relocation of all affected utility company facilities within the City limits of Garden Grove in a timely manner.

Page 305 of 448 ends

4. Santa Ana and Garden Grove shall extend cooperation to each other and proceed under this Agreement in good faith to facilitate timely completion of the Project. The Parties agree that when any component of this Project is subject to the approval of Garden Grove, such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

5. Garden Grove will be notified as to the official advertising dates, bid opening date, construction start date, and overall construction schedule. Also, a representative from Garden Grove will be invited to attend pre-construction, Project status, and final walk through meetings.

6. Change orders for work within Garden Grove must receive the written approval of the Public Works Department Engineering Manager of Garden Grove or his/her designee prior to implementation.

Garden Grove is responsible for change order cost within Garden Grove respective boundaries.

7. The following staff members, or as otherwise designated in writing by the Executive Director of Public Works of Santa Ana or the Public Works Department Engineering Manager of Garden Grove, shall be the selected representatives of each City to act on each respective City's behalf with respect to this agreement. Any notices, requests, approvals, plan submittals or communications shall be provided to each representative noted below:

City of Santa Ana:

ATTN: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E.

City Engineer
Public Works Agency
Santa Ana, CA 92701
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-21
Phone: (714) 647-3379
E-Mail: [email protected]

City of Garden Grove:

ATTN: Dan Candelaria, P.E.,TE
City Engineer
Public Works Department
11222 Acacia Parkway
Garden Grove, CA 92840
Phone: (714) 741-5185
E-Mail: [email protected]

8. Santa Ana shall cause its contractor for the Project to guarantee the Garden Grove improvements against defects in workmanship and materials for a period of one (I) year from the date of acceptance by Santa Ana. It is further agreed that Santa Ana shall assume the responsibility for causing the Garden Grove improvements to be brought or restored to full compliance with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications for any portion of the Project which during said one (I) year period are found not to be in conformance with the provisions of the Plans and Specifications.

9. The City of Santa Ana shall have its contractor provide insurance as follows:

9.1 INSURANCE AMOUNTS. Contractor shall maintain the following insurance for the duration of this Agreement:

(a) Commercial general liability in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence; ( claims made and modified occurrence policies are not acceptable); Insurance companies must be acceptable to City and have an AM Best's Guide Rating of A - Class VII or better, as approved by the City. If Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Page 306 of 448 ends

An Additional Insured Endorsement, ongoing and completed operations , for the policy shall designate the City of Santa Ana, the City of Garden Grove, their officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds for liability arising out of w ork or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor. Contractor shall provide to City proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to City's requirements, as approved by the City.

(b) Automobile liability in the amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit, including mobile equipment if applicable; ( claims made and modified occurrence policies are not acceptable); Insurance companies must be acceptable to City and have an AM Best's Guide Rating of A-, Class VII or better, as approved by the City.

An Additional Insured Endorsement for the policy shall designate the City of Garden Grove, the City of Santa Ana, their officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds for automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the Contractor.

Contractor shall provide to City proof of insurance and endorsement forms that conform to City's requirements, as approved by the City.

(c) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be in excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.

9.2 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE. For the duration of this Agreement, Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain Workers Compensation Insurance in the amount and type required by law, if applicable. The insurer shall waive its rights of subrogation against the City of Garden Grove, the City of Santa Ana, their officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers.

9.3. CONTRACTOR shall not commence work until all certificates and endorsements have been received and approved by Santa Ana. All insurance required shall contain a Statement of Obligation on the part of the carrier to notify City of any material change, cancellation, or termination at least thirty (30) days in advance.

10. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the Parties regarding the Project and all previous understandings, negotiations and agreements regarding the Project are integrated into and superseded by this Agreement.

11. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the Parties by an instrument in writing signed by both Parties.

12. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder.

13. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said Parties and that by so executing this Agreement the Parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.

Page 307 of 448 ends

14. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall endure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns.

15. This Agreement may be executed by the Parties and counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the Parties had executed the same instrument.

16. This Agreement is to be governed by the laws of the State of California, in Orange County California.

17. Each party agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other as to any and all claims, judgments, liabilities or damages for injuries and damages directly arising out of each party's own performance under this Agreement, except to the extent such damage or expense is caused in whole or in part by the other party's negligence or willful misconduct.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first written above.

CITY OF SANTA ANA
________________________________
Kristine Ridge
City Manager

ATTEST:
_________________________________
Jennifer L. Hall
Clerk of the Council City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney

By: ______________________________
JOHN M. FUNK
Assistant City Attorney

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

CITY OF GARDEN GROVE
______________________________
Scott C. Stiles
City Manager

ATTEST:
_____________________________

TERESA POMEROY
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

__________________________

OMAR SANDOVAL
City Attorney

_________________________________
Nabil Saba, P.E.

Executive Director
Public Works Agency

Page 308 of 448 ends

Exhibit A

Location Map

Westminster Boulevard (Newhope St. to Harbor Blvd.)
Street Rehabilitation Project

Page 309 of 448 ends

PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 22-6989:

Westminster Ave Rehabilitation
From Newhope St to Harbor Blvd
Exhibit A
- Project Location
Legend

Page 310 of 448 ends

-
-·-.
•:
f-(/)
0 ::i
■-·
u
::J
L!J
-.
,. -.

EDINGER
r
\
f-(/)
L!J
a. 0
I
s:

L!J
z
1ST ST

MC FADDE
AV
i
J
0 > ...J
(!J
Q'.
0 (!J
Q'.
<!
I
AV
. -..

GARDEN GROVE
.. -~
I
f-(/)
...J
0 f-(/)
ii:
(!J
SANTA
1ST ST
f-
(/) f-
s:
(/)
f-L!J f-5
~ Q'.
~

EDINGER AV
f-
(/)
f-
!::
~ f-
(/)
...J
~
(/)

MACARTHUR BLVD
ii:
(!J

SUNFL WER
-··
AV

FAIRHAVEN AV

SANTA CLARA AV
..
~
WA HINGTON V ~
z ;=
(/)
::J
f-

ANA BLVD
f- f-
(/) (/)
0: z
L!J
i
;;:
s: ::;
0 ••
...J 0
u. <!
I 0
Q'.
i (!J
f-(/)

MC FADDEN AV
...J
0 f-(/)
ii:
(!J

EDINGER AV
i > <!
0 0
<! z
0 ~ Q'.
('.) (!J

WARNER AV
0).-; ♦; DYER RD
~,s, ;
"11,, ,♦ .;/:-
♦
f f-
(/) ♦
z •,./ <1; ♦; <{5, ;;: • .,.01,, ; ::;
.<#..,,,,,

EXHIBIT B

City Cost Sharing

Westminster Boulevard (Newhope St. to Harbor Blvd.)
Street Rehabilitation Project

City of Santa Ana Cost
Table 1

City of Garden Grove Cost
Table 2

Page 311 of 448 ends

Project No.: 22-6989
Preparer: AV Date Revised: 06/06/23
Reviewer: GC Date Reviewed:

Item
No. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
1 Unclassified Excavation CY 870 280.00 $ 243,600.00$ 2 Asphalt Concrete TN 1,240 200.00 $ 248,000.00$ 3 Cold Mill (2") SF 178,000 1.00 $ 178,000.00$ 4 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) TN 2,500 260.00 $ 650,000.00$ 5 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") SF 5,800 14.00 $ 81,200.00$ 6 PCC Driveway Approach (T=8") SF 1,100 25.00 $ 27,500.00$ 7 PCC Curb Ramp SF 800 18.00$ 14,400.00$ 8 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) LF 500 50.00$ 25,000.00$ 9 PCC (B-1) Curb (Including Steel Rebar Dowels) LF 100 25.00$ 2,500.00$ 10 Root Shave* EA 5 650.00$ 3,300.00$
11 Adjust Water Valve Frame and Cover Per CSA
STD. EA 22 $ 1,100.00 $ 24,200.00 12 Adjust Water Vault Frame and Cover Per CSA
STD. EA 1 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 13 Adjust Water Meter Frame and Cover Per CSA
STD. EA 6 $ 800.00 $ 4,800.00 14 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover Per CSA STD. EA 23 $ 1,200.00 $ 27,600.00 15 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover Per OCFCD
STD. EA 3 $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 16 Parkway Culver Type B EA 2 $ 400.00 $ 800.00 17 Furnish and Install New #6 Pullbox EA 4 1,100.00$ 4,400.00$ 18 Adjust Survey Monument Frame and Cover EA 2 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 19 Furnish and Install Traffic Loops Type D † EA 28 500.00$ 14,000.00$ 20 Furnish and Install Traffic Loops Type E † EA 56 500.00$ 28,000.00$ 21 Furnish and Install Traffic Loops Type Q † EA 2 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 22 Project Advertisement Sign EA 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 23 Signing and Striping LS 1 44,370.00$ 44,400.00$

24 As-Built Plans LS 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$
25 Construction Permits EA 1 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 1,645,800.00$
Contingency 10% 165,000.00$
Construction Engineering 15% 247,000.00$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,058,000.00$

SURPLUS / DEFICIT

COST ESTIMATE-SANTA ANA
22-6989 - Westminster Avenue Rehabilitation
Newhope St to Harbor Blvd

ENGINEER

CITY OF SANTA ANA
EXHIBIT B - TABLE 1

Page 312 of 448 ends

Project No.: 22-6989
Preparer: AV Date Revised: 06/06/23
Reviewer: GC - Nick Hsieh Date Reviewed:

Item
No. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
1 Unclassified Excavation CY 170 280.00$ 47,600.00$ 2 Asphalt Concrete TN 210 200.00$ 42,000.00$ 3 Cold Mill (2") SF 35,000 1.00$ 35,000.00$ 4 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) TN 500 260.00$ 130,000.00$ 5 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") SF 1,400 14.00$ 19,600.00$ 6 PCC Curb Ramp SF 1,000 18.00$ 18,000.00$ 7 Truncated Domes EA 3 1,500.00$ 4,500.00$
8 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) LF 300 50.00$ 15,000.00$ 9 Furnish and Install Water Valve Lid and Slip Can
Per GG STD EA 26 1,200.00$ 31,200.00$
10 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover Per GG STD. EA 2 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 11 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover Per OCSD STD. EA 2 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 12 Furnish and Install Manhole Per GG STD. EA 1 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 13 Install FABCO CPS Unit EA 5 3,800.00$ 19,000.00$ 14 Catch Basin Top Slab Reconstruction LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 15 Project Advertisement Sign EA 1 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 16 Signing and Striping LS 1 7,830.00$ 7,800.00$ 17 As-Built Plans LS 1 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 392,700.00$
Design Engineering 15% 59,000.00$
Contingency 10% 39,000.00$
Construction Engineering 15% 59,000.00$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 550,000.00$

SURPLUS / DEFICIT

COST ESTIMATE- GARDEN GROVE
22-6989 - Westminster Avenue Rehabilitation
Newhope St to Harbor Blvd

ENGINEER

CITY OF SANTA ANA
EXHIBIT B - TABLE 2

Page 313 of 448 ends

Agenda Item - 7.e.

City of Garden Grove

INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
To: Lisa L. Kim From: Craig Beck
Dept.: City Manager Dept.: Community and Economic
Development
Subject: Award contract to WGJ Enterprises,
Inc. dba PCI , for the construction
of the Bicycle Corridor
Improvement Project (BCIP),
includes improved bicycle signing
and striping upgrades Citywide.
(Cost:$1,272,469.55) ( Action Item)
Date: 6/27/2023

OBJECTIVE
For the City Council to award a contract to WGJ Enterprises, Inc. dba PCI for the construction of the Bicycle Corridor Improvement Project (BCIP) located Citywide, City Project No. 2312.

BACKGROUND
The BCIP is a $20 million grant program for projects that make bicycling and walking easier and safer in Orange County. Funding for the program comes from the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, a federal program that provides funding for transportation projects that help meet Federal Clean Air Act requirements and for implementation of goals from the Garden Grove Active Streets Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

In 2018, the Community and Economic Development Department was awarded $1.018 million in Caltrans grant funds to provide resources to improve on-street bicycle infrastructure by 75%. The project scope incorporates approximately 15 miles of new and improved bicycle signing and striping upgrades located at Brookhurst Avenue (From Trask Avenue to Katella Avenue), West Street (From Garden Grove Boulevard to Orangewood Avenue), Chapman Avenue (From Valley View Street To Beach Boulevard), Gilbert Street (From Deodora Drive to Katella Avenue), and Lampson Avenue (From Dale Street to Haster Street). See Attachment No. 3 BCIP Bike Lane Project Street Map.

· Phase 1:Environmental study completed in 2019 · Phase 2: Design and Engineering completed in 2020 · Phase 3: Right-of-Way (ROW) certification completed in 2021 · Phase 4: Construction is anticipated to be completed in September 2023

DISCUSSION
Staff solicited bids for this project pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.52.010. The Invitation to Bids for construction of the BCIP project was posted on the City PlanetBid Portal.

Two (2) qualified bid proposals were received at the City Clerk’s Office by 11:00 a.m. on March 9, 2023. The bid amount from PCI, was the lowest responsible bidder at $1,272,469.55. The licenses and references of the contractor have been reviewed and verified by staff, and all other documentation is in order.

The bid results are as follows:

BIDDERS AMOUNT OF BID

Page 314 of 448 ends

Garden Grove City CouncilJune 27, 2023

Garden Grove City Council
June 27, 2023