Gardena City Council
March 8, 2022

Project Site
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

FIGURE 2: ZONING MAP

The site is approximately 0.48 gross acres and contains an L-shaped building that was previously occupied by an automotive repair facility . The property h as been vacant since 2017. Several code enforcement violations for graffi ti, overgr own vegetation, dangerous and unsecured building, have been issued to the owner.

The applicant is proposing to dem olish the blighted building, repave the area for 33 parking spaces and construct a 3,720- sf commercial building for three tenant spaces and a drive thru (Figure 3 – Site Plan). 7 Leaves Café, a coffee and tea café, plans to operate out of the largest tenant space with the drive-thru windows. The other two tenant s paces do not have specific tenants at this time but are designed for either restaurant, retail or office uses.

The project will introduce new landscaping along both street frontages and throughout the parking areas, and a new trash enclosure that will be t reated to match the colors and material of the proposed building. The building is of contemporary design and includes a neutral color palette as more fully described below.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

The applicant seeks site plan review approval to allow the demolition of the existi ng building and the construction of the proposed multitenant commercial building in the C-2 zone. Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approve the site plan review per the findings of the following analysis.

FIGURE 3: SITE PLAN

ANALYSIS
In accordance with Gardena Municipal Code (GMC) Section 18.44.010. B, site plan review is required for all development projects that front Western Avenue. Site plan review approval r equires the following findings to be made: (1) the development is consistent with the intent and purpose of the gener al plan and provisions of the municipal code, and (2) the development will not adversely affect the orderly and harmonious development of the area and the general welfare of the City. Therefore, the RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

following analysis is presented to describe the proposed project and any anticipated effects it may have on other properties in the vicinity and the city as a whole.

SITE PLAN REVIEW
The subject property is located in the C -2 and M UO zones. The applicant is not proposing a mixed- use development and therefore is subject to the provisions of the underlying zoning district of C-2.

Parking for the proposed restaurant, retail, and office spaces is consistent with the GMC Chapter 18.40. T he 3, 720-sf structure requires a total of 3 3 parking spaces . The applicant is proposing 33 parking spaces, including two accessible spac es and eight compact spaces. The majority of the parking spaces will be located al ong the east and south property lines, which will provide a buffer to adjacent land uses.

Commercial or industrial zoned properties that have street frontage are required to provide a ten-foot setback dedicated to landscaping. As shown in the project plans the frontages along Marine Avenue and Western Avenue w ill include a ten-foot landscaped setback with a variety of trees and shrubbery. In accordance with GMC Section

18.40.090.B, five percent of the total paved area utilized for driveways and open parking areas shall also be landscaped. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 1,389- sf of landscaping throughout the parking areas including a three-foot planter in front of the parking spaces along the east and south property lines.

As shown in Table 1 bel ow, the projec t meets or exceeds all of the minimum development standards of the C -2 zone, therefor e, the development will not adversely affect the orderly and harmonious development of the area and the general welfare of the City.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

TABLE 1: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR C-2 ZONE
Standard Requirement Proposed Compliant?
Lot Area (Min.) 7,500-sf 20,900-sf Yes
Lot Dimensions (Min.)
Width 50 feet 139 feet Yes
Depth 150 150 Yes
FAR (Max.) 0.5 0.18 Yes
Building Setback (Min.)
Front 10 feet 22 feet Yes
Side (north) 10 22 Yes
Side (south) 0 68 Yes
Rear 0 48 Yes
Parking (Minimum)
Drive thru: One space per 100-sf 20 spaces
Food and beverage establishment:

One space per 100-sf
9 Retail: One space per 200-sf 4
Total 33 33 Yes
Parking, Compact
25 percent 8 spaces 8 spaces Yes
Building Height (Max.) 45 feet 23 feet Yes
Landscaping
Street Frontage First 10 feet First 10 feet Yes
Minimum (5% of paving) 257-sf 1,389-sf Yes

Development Aesthetics
The proposed commercial building is of contemporary design. The roofline incorporates parapet walls that alternate in height to help screen rooftop mechanical equipment f rom view at ground level while creating visual interest . The building also has changes in planes and materials throughout the elevat ions that assist in preventing a single massing and box -like structure. The building materials includes a light brown stucco finish, wood like planks and brick veneer. Metal awnings hang over the doorways and sconce light fixtures are located around the building. The quality design of the building will bring a much-needed interest to the built environment of this neighborhood.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

In acc ordance with Gardena Municipal Code Section 18.44.030.B, in addition to all other applicable development requirements and po licies, the following are to be considered in determining whether the site plan shall be approved:

1. The dimensions, shape and orientation of the parcel; o The site is a 20,900- sf rectangular parcel and measures approximately 139 feet by 150 feet. The parcel is located on the southeast corner of Western Avenue and Marine Avenue. The dimension and orientation of the project si te sets the stage for a development to meet all of the minimum development standards of the C-2 zone.

2. The placement of buildings and structures on the parcel; o The project consists of one commercial building containing three tenant spaces with a drive-thru aisle that wraps around the north and west side of the building. The building is located towards the northwest corner of the property. Vehicular access is provided by two driveways: one off of Western Avenue and the other off Marine Avenue.

3. The height, setbacks, bulk and building materials;
o The C-2 zone allows for a m aximum building height of 45 feet when the property is within 100- feet of the R -3 zone. The proposed commercial building is one-story with a maximum height of 23 feet. The design of the building uses changes in planes and materials to prevent a single massing and box-like structure. Building materials include stucco finish, wood like planks brick veneer, metal awnings and sconce light fixtures.

4. The distance between buildings or structures;
o The project consists of one commercial structure. The only other structure proposed is the new trash enclosure that is located on t he southeast corner of the site and has a distance of approximately 70 feet from the new commercial building.

5. The location, number and layout of off-street parking and loading spaces; o Per GMC Chapter 18.40, fast food drive- throughs and other food and drinking establishments requires one off -street parking space for every 100-sf of gross floor area. Re tail uses have a parking requirement of one space per 2 00-sf. In total the project is required to provide 33 off -street parking spaces . The project is providing 33 spaces with the ma jority located along the east and south property lines, and seven sp aces, including two accessible spaces, directly in front of the tenants’ entrances.

6. The internal vehicular patterns and pedestrian safety features; o Vehicular access is provided by two driveways: one off of Western Avenue and the other off Marine Avenue with a 26-foot-wide drive aisle that connects the two entrances . The proposed building includes a drive-thru that will be abl e to queue seven vehicles without spilling over i nto the parking area.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

7. The location, amount and nature of landscaping;
o The project exceeds the landscape requirements throughout the new parking area and provides ten-foot planters along both street frontages of the property that includes various trees and shrubberies.

8. The placement, height and direction of illumination of light standards; o The applicant is proposing to light all entrances into the buildings and throughout the parking lot area. Additionally, as conditioned, the applicant shall provide a lighting plan that demonstrates an average of two footcandles with no single point less than one footcandle for all public/common areas . The applic ant will a lso be conditioned to ensure that all light fixtures shall be designed and located in a manner that does not allow spillover onto adjacent properties

9. The location, number, size and height of signs;
o The site has an existing freestanding pylon sign on the northwest corner of the property. The applicant’s proposal does not include any new signs. A condition of approval will require that the applicant comply with the City’s sign regulations.

10. The location, height and materials of walls, fences or hedges; o The applicant is proposing a new 8-foot-high decorative block wall along the south and east property l ines. A three-foot decorating fencing three- feet back along the street frontages.

11. The location and method of screening refuse and storage areas, roof equipment, pipes, vents, utility equipment and all equipment not contained in the main buildings of the development;
o The applicant is proposing to construct a trash enclosure that will match the colors and materials of the proposed buildings. A condition of approval is included to require any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, or ground to be concealed from public view.

12. Such other information which the community development director may require to make the necessary findings that the provisions of t his code are being complied with.
o None.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The General Plan Land Use P lan designates the subject property as Neighbor hood Commercial. The Neighborhood Commercial Land Use category is designed to serve the surrounding residential nei ghborhoods with uses suc h as smaller scale food markets, drug stores, restaurants, and other neighborhood-oriented retail and professional uses. Allowing the development of a 3,720- sf commercial center with a RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

drive-thru would be consistent with various goals and policies of the General Plan including the following:
 Land Use Goal 2 – Develop and preserve high quality commercial centers and clean industrial uses that benefit the City’s tax base, create jobs and provide a full range of services to the residents and businesses.  Land Use Policy 2.1 – Require ample landscaping and high-level maintenance in all new and existing commercial and industrial developments.  Land Use Policy 2.1 – Provide neighborhood commercial centers with convenient and safe pedestrian access.
 Land Use Goal 3 – Provide high quality, attractive, and well -maintained commercial, industri al, and public environments that enhance the image and vitality of the City.
 Land Use Policy 3.5 – Promote the development and preservation of attractive commercial and industrial development wi th ample landscape treatment, adequate parking, and the full range of customer amenities.  Economic Development Goal 3 – Attract desirable businesses to locate in the City.
 Community Design Goal 4 – Achieve high quality design for commercial areas.  Community Design Goal 7 – Utilize extensive landscaping to beautify Gardena’s streets and sidewalks.

The development of a multi -tenant commercial building with a dri ve-thru will enhance the appearance and image of the neighborhood by removing a blighted building and constructing a new high quality commercial center. The projec t includes an abundant amount of landscaping throughout the parking area and along Western Avenue and Marine Avenue, thus making Gardena streets more aesthetically pleasing.

The proposed building includes contemporary architecture that features a combination of stucco finish, wood like planks brick veneer , and metal awnings standing. The high- quality design of the proposed building will contribute to e nhancing the image and vitality of the City.

The well-designed commercial center will help attract desirable businesses to locate in the City which will also contribute to the City’s tax base while creating jobs.

Subject to the approval of the site plan rev iew and the issuance of the conditi ons of approval, the proposed use wi ll be consistent with the General Plan and Gardena Municipal Code, compatible with the surrounding area, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15303(c) , New Construction Projects. Per CEQA Guidelines, the subject property is in an urbanized area where all necessary public services and facilities are av ailable, and the proposed structure does not exceed 10,000 square feet in floor area. As well, the use of a restaurant, retail and office does not involve the use of hazardous substances and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. These findings qualify the subject project for inclusion under Section 15303(c) of the CEQA Guidelines.

The project is not subject to any of the exceptions for exemption under Section 15300.2 of the California Environmental Quality Act. The location of the project is predominantly urban and not considered a sensiti ve environment; therefore, the project will not result in any significant impacts that may otherwise occur in a sensitive environmental area.

The cumulative impact of this project, and the approval of ot her projects like it in the vicinity, is not expecte d to have any significant environmental impact. Not only would the project not have any significant effects, but there are no unusual circumstances applicable to thi s project site. The project is not located along any state designated scenic highway nor within any designated hazardous waste site. There are no historical resources which would be impacted. Staff does not expect any significant impact s or unusual circumstances related to the approval of this project.

Therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA.

NOTICING
The public hearing notice for Site Plan Review #4 -21 was published in the Gardena Valley News and mailed first class to owners and occupants within a 300- foot radius of the site on January 20, 2022. A copy of Proof of Publication and Affidavit of Mailing are on file in the office of the Community Development Department, Room 101, City Hall, and are considered part of the administrative record.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission to:
1) Open the public hearing;
2) Receive testimony from the public; and
3) Adopt Resolution PC 2 -22 approving Site Plan Review #4-21 subject to the attached conditions of approval and directing staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. PC 2-22
Exhibit A –Conditions of Approval for SPR #4-21
Exhibit B – Project Plans

RESOLUTION NO. PC 2-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW #4-21 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 3,720 SQUARE-FOOT MULTI-

TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH A DRIVE-THRU IN THE COMMERCIAL (C- 2) AND MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONES AND DIRECTING STAFF TO FILE A NOTICE

OF EXEMPTION FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OF SMALL STRUCTURES
15106 SOUTH WESTERN AVENUE
(APN: 6103-018-027)

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. RECITALS.

A. On May 17, 2021, the applicant Sarah Withers, submitted an application for a site plan review for the construction of an approximately 4,000 square foot multi-tenant commercial building with a drive-thru and a variance to allow a reduced front yard setback dedicated for landscaping, for the property located at 15106 South Western Avenue (the “Property”);
B. The Planning staff determined that the project did not meet the requirements to allow for the requested variance, at which time the applicant withdrew the variance request and revised the project to include a 3,720 square foot commercial building with a drive-thru (the “Project”);
C. The General Plan Land Use Plan designation of the Property is Neighborhood Commercial, and the zoning is C -2 (Commercial) and MUO (Mixed -Use Overlay);
D. The Property is bounded by a drive-thru donut shop to the north across Marine Avenue, a residential apartment building to the east, a commercial shopping center to the south, and a gasoline station to the west across Western Avenue; E. On January 20, 202 2, a public hearing was duly noticed for a virtual Planning and Environmental Quality Commission meeting for February 1, 2022, at 7 PM; F. On February 1, 2022, the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission held a public hearing at which time it considered all material and evidence, whether written or oral; and
G. In making the various findings set forth herein, the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission has considered all of the evidence presented by staff, the applicant, and the public, whether written or oral, and has considered the procedures and the standards required by the Gardena Municipal Code.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

SECTION 2. SITE PLAN REVIEW #4-21
Site Plan Review (#4-21) for the construction of an approximately 3,720 square foot multi- tenant commercial building with a drive- thru, is hereby approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A. The plans being approved are those presented to the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission on February 1, 2022, attached hereto as Exhibit B , as the same may be modified by the conditions of approval.

A. The proposed development, including the uses and physical design, is consistent w ith the intent and general purpose of the general plan and provisions of the municipal code.

The Project meets or exceeds all applicable provisions of the Gardena Municipal Code and is consistent with various goals and policies of the Gardena General Plan including the following:
o Land Use Goal 2 – Develop and preserve high quality commercial centers and clean industrial uses that benefit the City’s tax base, create jobs and provide a full range of services to the residents and businesses. o Land Use Policy 2.1 – Require ample landscaping and high-level maintenance in all new and existing commercial and industrial developments. o Land Use Policy 2.1 – Provide neighborhood commerci al centers with convenient and safe pedestrian access.
o Land Use Goal 3 – Provide high quality, attractive, and well -maintained commercial, industrial, and public environments that enhance the image and vitality of the City.
o Land Use Policy 3.5 – Promote the development and preservation of attractive commercial and industrial development with ample landscape treatment, adequate parking, and the full range of customer amenities. o Economic Development Goal 3 – Attract desirable businesses to locate in the City.
o Community Design Goal 4 – Achieve high quality design for commercial areas.

o Community Design Goal 7 – Utilize extensive landscaping to beautify Gardena’s streets and sidewalks.

The Project will enhance the appearance and image of the neighborhood by removing a blighted building and constructing a new high quality commercial center. The P roject includes an abundant amount of landscape that will be provided throughout the new parking area and along Western Avenue and Marine Avenue, thus making Gardena streets more aesthetically pleasing.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

The Project includes contemporary architecture that features a combination of stucco finish, wood like planks brick veneer, and metal awnings standing. The high-quality design of the commercial building will not only contribute to enhancing the image and vitality of the City but also attract desirable businesses to locate in the City that will ultimately contribute to the City’s tax base and create new jobs.

B. The proposed development will not adversely affect the orderly and harmonious development of the area and the general welfare of the city.

As set forth above and in the staff report, which is incorporated by reference, the project as conditioned, will be compatible with, and not detrimental to, the surrounding land uses and general welfare of the City.

SECTION 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS.

The project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to the following exemption:

A. Class 3—Section 15303(c) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

The Property is in an urbanized area where all necessary public services and facilities are available, and the structures do not exceed 10,000 square feet in floor area. The restaurant, retail and office uses, do not involve the use of hazardous substances and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. These findings qualify the subject project for exemption under Section 15303(c) of the CEQA Guidelines.

B. The Project is not subject to any of the exceptions for exemption under Section 15300.2 of the California Environmental Quality Act. The location of the project is predominantly urban and not considered a sensitive environment; therefore, the project will not result in any significant impacts that may otherwise occur in a sensitive environmental area. The cumulative impact of the Project, and the approval of other projects like it in the vicinity, is not expected to have any significant environmental impact. Not only would the P roject not have any significant effects, but there are no unusual circumstances applicable to the Property. The Project is not located along any state designated scenic highway nor within any designated hazardous waste site. There are no historical resources which would be impacted. Staff does not expect any significant impacts or unusual circumstances related to the approval of this project.

C. Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption for a Class 3 categorical exemption.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

SECTION 4. APPEAL.

The approvals granted by this Resolution may be appealed within 10 calendar days from adoption of this resolution. All appeals must be in writing and filed with the City Clerk within this time period with the appropriate fee. Failure to file a timely written appeal will constitute a waiver of any right of appeal. The City Council may also call this matter for review within the same time period.

SECTION 5. RECORD.

Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the Project. All summaries of information in the findings which precede this section are based on the entire record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 6. CUSTODIAN OF RECORD.

The Custodian of Record for the proceedings relating to the Project is Greg Tsujiuchi, Community Development Director , City of Gardena, 1700 West 162nd Street, Gardena, California 90247. Mr. Tsujiuchi ’s email is [email protected] and his phone number is (310) 217-9530.

SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Resolution shall take effect immediately.

SECTION 8. CERTIFICATION.

The Secretary shall certify the passage of this resolution.

RESO NO. PC 2-22; SPR #4-21
February 1, 2022

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of February 2022.

LANGLEY STEPHEN, CHAIR

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY COMMISSION
A
TTEST:
___________________________________

GREG TSUJIUCHI, SECRETARY

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF GARDENA
I, Greg Tsujiuchi, Planning and Environmental Quality Commission Secretary of the City of Gardena, do hereby certify the following:

1. That a copy of this Resolution and the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) will be sent to the applicant and to the City Council as a report of the findings and action of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission; and

2. That the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission of the City of Gardena at a regular meeting thereof, held the 1st day of February 2022, by the following vote of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission:

AYES: Henderson, Kanhan, Sherman, Langley
N
OES:

ABSENT:

Attachments:
• Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval
• Exhibit B: Development Plans

City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 13.B
Section: DEPARTMENTAL

ITEMS - ELECTED & CITY

MANAGER'S OFFICES
Meeting Date: March 8, 2022

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:

Approve Contract with Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Staff Recommendation: Approve Contract
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

Legislative advocacy plays a central role in protecting local control for cities. It is a way for the voice of the constituents to be heard, it builds and strengthens relevant relationships and is the first step in taking action to make changes to benefit our communities. The City realizes how challenging it can be to keep up with the developments at the state Capitol that affect our city, especially as we address the deluge of community issues as we recover from the effects of the pandemic.

Because we have a responsibility to our community to look after their best interests at all levels of government, it is staff's recommendation that the City contract with Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. for these vitally important services. With 23 years of experience, Townsend Public Affairs (TPA) brings the resources and relationships expected from a premier firm with the added benefits of personal attention, maximum accessibility, and passion for their mission.

The strategic approach to advocacy and funding will be tailored to meet the City's specific needs by utilizing TPA's vast network of relationships with key stakeholders and decision- makers, a proven formula that has shepherded over 100 legislative and regulatory proposals into law as well as securing over $2.2 billion in grant funding.

As effective advocacy requires an ongoing and focused effort, staff therefore recommends that Council approve a one-year contract with Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. in the amount of $84,000 to provide legislative advocacy and grant writing services.

FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:

General Fund: $84,000
ATTACHMENTS:

TPA - Townsend.pdf

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

THE CITY OF GARDENA
AND
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC. (TPA)

FOR LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY AND GRANT FUNDING SERVICES

This contract, hereinafter referred to as Agreement, is entered into by and between THE CITY OF GARDENA (“City”) and TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS (TPA), a CORPORATION (“Consultant”). Based on the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Recitals.

A. City is desirous of obtaining services necessary to provide legislative advocacy and grant funding services.

B. Consultant is qualified by virtue of experience, training, education and expertise to provide these services.

C. City has determined that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require the execution of this Agreement.

2. Services.

A. The services to be performed by Consultant shall consist of the following (“Services”): As specified in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, unless otherwise instructed by City.

B. The Services shall be performed in accordance with the Project Schedule set forth in Exhibit A. Consultant shall not be liable for any failure or delay in furnishing proposed services resulting from fire, explosion, flood, storm, Act of God, governmental acts, orders or regulations, hostilities, civil disturbances, strikes, labor difficulties, difficulty in obtaining parts, supplies, or shipping facilities, inability to obtain or delays in obtaining suitable material or facilities required for performance, temporary unavailability of qualified personnel, failure by City to provide appropriate access to equipment or personnel, or other causes beyond Consultant’s reasonable control.

3. Additional Services. If City determines that additional services are required to be provided by Consultant in addition to the Services set forth above, City shall authorize Consultant to perform such additional services in writing (“Additional Services”). Such Additional Services shall be specifically described and approved by City in writing prior to the performance thereof. Consultant shall be compensated for such Additional Services in accordance with the amount agreed upon in writing by the Parties. No compensation shall be paid to Consultant for Additional Services which are not 2 specifically approved by City in writing.

4. Agreement Administrator. For purposes of this Agreement, City designates Clint Osorio as the Agreement Administrator who shall monitor Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. All notices, invoices or other documents shall be addressed to the Agreement Administrator, as well as all substantive issues relating to this contract.

City reserves the right to change this designation upon written notice to Consultant.

5. Consultant’s Proposal. This Agreement shall include Consultant’s proposal or bid which is incorporated herein as Exhibit A. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of the proposal and this Agreement, this Agreement shall govern.

6. Timing of Performance. Time is of the essence with respect to Consultant’s performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall diligently and timely pursue and complete the performance of the Services required of it by this Agreement as set forth in Exhibit A. City, in its sole discretion, may extend the time for performance of any Service.

7. Compensation. Compensation for the Services shall be billed as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto. The Compensation is inclusive of all costs that may be incurred by Consultant in performance of the Services, including but not limited to such items as travel, copies, delivery charges, phone charges, and facsimile charges, unless otherwise noted.

8. Term of Agreement/Termination.

A. This Agreement shall be effect from March 15, 2022 through March 15, 2023 and shall remain in effect until all Services are completed or until terminated as provided for herein.

B. City may terminate this Agreement without cause by providing written notice to Consultant not less than three days prior to an effective termination date.

City’s only obligation in the event of termination will be payment of fees and allowed expenses incurred up to and including the effective date of termination.

C. Unless for cause, Consultant may not terminate this Agreement. If Consultant is terminating this Agreement for cause, it must provide the City with thirty (30) days written notice.

D. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Consultant shall: (1) promptly discontinue all Services, unless the notice directs otherwise; and (2) within ten (10) days, deliver to City all files, data, reports, estimates, summaries, and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated or prepared to date by Consultant in performing the Services under this Agreement, whether completed or in 3 progress. Consultant shall provide these documents by both hard copy and in electronic format if available. In the event of termination for other than cause attributable to Consultant, Consultant shall be entitled to reasonable compensation for the services it performs up to the date of termination and shall be deemed released from liability for any work assigned but not completed as of the effective date of termination.

9. Invoices and Payments.

A. Payment shall be made upon receipt and approval of invoices for Services rendered. In order for payment to be made, Consultant’s invoice must include an itemization as to the services rendered, date(s) of service, direct and/or subcontract costs, and be submitted on an official letterhead or invoice with Consultant’s name, address, and telephone number referenced.

B. The Agreement Administrator shall review the invoices to determine whether services performed and documents submitted are consistent with this Agreement. Payment shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of the invoice or the Agreement Administrator shall provide Consultant with a written statement objecting to the charges and stating the reasons therefore.

C. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment.

10. Records/Audit.

A. Consultant shall be responsible for ensuring accuracy and propriety of all billings and shall maintain all supporting documentation for a minimum of three (3) years from the completion date of the Services under this agreement the following records:

1. All accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Agreement and assure proper accounting for all funds;

2. Records which establish that Consultant and any subconsultant who renders Services under this Agreement are in full compliance with the requirements of this Agreement and all federal, state and local laws and regulations

3. Any additional records deemed necessary by City to assume verification of full compliance with this Agreement.

B. City shall have the right to audit Consultant’s invoices and all supporting documentation for purposes of compliance with this Agreement for a period of three years following the completion of Services under this Agreement. 4 C. Upon reasonable notice from City or any other governmental agency, Consultant shall cooperate fully with any audit of its billings conducted by, or of, City and shall permit access to its books, records and accounts as may be necessary to conduct such audits.

11. Successors and Assignment. This Agreement covers professional services of a specific and unique nature. Except as otherwise provided herein, Consultant shall not assign or transfer its interest in this Agreement or subcontract any services to be performed without amending this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

12. Change in Name, Ownership or Control. Consultant shall notify the Agreement Administrator, in writing, of any change in name, ownership or control of Consultant’s firm or subconsultant. Change of ownership or control of Consultant’s firm may require an amendment to the Agreement.

13. Key Personnel. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. In the event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the Agreement, desires the removal of any person or persons assigned by Consultant to perform Services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall remove any such person immediately upon receiving notice from City.

14. Use of Materials.

A. City shall make available to Consultant such materials from its files as may be required by Consultant to perform Services under this Agreement. Such materials shall remain the property of City while in Consultant’s possession. Upon termination of this Agreement and payment of outstanding invoices of Consultant, or completion of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall return to City any property of City in its possession and any calculations, notes, reports, electronic files, or other materials prepared by Consultant in the course of performance of this Agreement.

B. City may utilize any material prepared or work performed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including computer software, in any manner, which City deems proper without additional compensation to Consultant. Consultant shall have no responsibility or liability for any revisions, changes, or corrections made by City, or any use or reuse pursuant to this paragraph unless Consultant accepts such responsibility in writing.

15. Nonuse of Intellectual Property of Third Parties. Consultant shall not use, disclose or copy any intellectual property of any third parties in connection with work 5 carried out under this Agreement, except for intellectual property for which Consultant has a license. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City harmless against all claims raised against City based upon allegations that Consultant has wrongfully used intellectual property of others in performing work for City, or that City has wrongfully used intellectual property developed by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.

16. Ownership of Work Product. All documents or other information created, developed, or received by Consultant shall, for purposes of copyright law, be deemed worked made for hire for City by Consultant and shall be the sole property of City.

Consultant shall provide City with copies of these items upon demand, and in any event, upon termination of this Agreement.

17. Legal Requirements.

A. Consultant shall secure and maintain all licenses or permits required by law, including a City business license, and shall comply with all ordinances, laws, orders, rules, and regulations pertaining to the work.

B. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services required by this Agreement in compliance with all applicable Federal and California employment laws, including, but not limited to, those laws related to minimum hours and wages; occupational health and safety; fair employment and employment practices; workers’ compensation insurance and safety in employment; and all other Federal, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the services required under this Agreement.

Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description including attorneys’ fees and costs, presented, brought, or recovered against City for, or on account of any liability under any of the above-mentioned laws, which may be incurred by reason of Consultant’s performance under this Agreement.

C. Consultant covenants that thee shall be no discrimination based upon race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, age, handicap, national origin or ancestry, or any other category forbidden by law in performance of this Agreement.

18. Conflict of Interest and Reporting.

A. Consultant shall at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest in the performance of this Agreement. If required, Consultant shall comply with the City’s Conflict of Interest reporting requirements. Consultant understands that pursuant to Gardena Municipal Code sections 2.24.020H and

2.24.025G, it is forbidden to make any contribution to a candidate or committee of a candidate for a municipal office of the City, or to an officeholder, until the completion of services to be performed under this Agreement.

6 B. Consultant and its representatives shall refrain from lobbying City of Gardena officials, employees and representatives for the duration of this Agreement.

19. Guarantee and Warranty. Consultant warrants to City that the material, analysis, data, programs and SERVICES to be delivered or rendered hereunder will be of the kind and quality designated and will be performed by qualified personnel. Without waiver of City’s other rights or remedies, City may require Consultant to re-perform any of said services, which were not performed in accordance with these standards.

Consultant shall perform the remedial services at its sole expense.

20. Insurance.

A. Commencement of Work. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained City approved insurance. Before beginning work hereunder, during the entire period of this Agreement, for any extensions hereto, and for periods after the end of this Agreement as may be indicated below, Consultant must have and maintain in place all of the insurance coverage required in this Section.

Consultant’s insurance shall comply with all items specified by this Agreement. Any subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements of this Section and Consultant shall be responsible to obtain evidence of insurance from each subcontractor and provide it to City before the subcontractor commences work. Alternatively, Consultant’s insurance may cover all subcontractors.

B. Insurance Company Requirements. All insurance policies used to satisfy the requirements imposed hereunder shall be issued by insurers admitted to do business in the State of California. Insurers shall have a current Best’s rating of not less than A-:VII, unless otherwise approved by City.

C. Coverage, Limits and Policy Requirements. Consultant shall maintain the types of coverage and limits indicated below:

1. Commercial General Liability Insurance - a policy for occurrence coverage for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, including all coverage provided by and to the extent afforded by Insurance Services Office Form CG 2010 ed. 10/93 or 11/85, with no special limitations affecting City. The limit for all coverage under this policy shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.

2. Commercial Auto Liability Insurance - a policy including all coverage provided by and to the extent afforded by Insurance Services Office form CA 0001, ed. 12/93, including Symbol 1 (any auto) with no special limitations affecting City.

The limit for bodily injury and property damage liability shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per accident.

3. Policy Requirements. The policies set forth above shall comply 7 with the following, as evidenced by the policies or endorsements to the policies:

a. The City, its appointed and elected officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be added as additional insured to the policy.

b. The insurer shall agree to provide City with thirty (30) days prior written notice, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, non-renewal or material change in coverage.

c. For any claims with respect to the Services covered by this Agreement, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

4. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance - a policy which meets all statutory benefit requirements of the Labor Code, or other applicable law, of the State of California. The minimum coverage limits for said insurance shall be no less than one million dollars per claim. The policy shall be issued by an insurance company which is admitted to do business in the State of California and shall contain a clause that the policy may not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice, return receipt requested, is mailed to City.

5. Professional Errors & Omissions - a policy with minimum limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per claim and aggregate. This policy shall be issued by an insurance company which is admitted to do business in the State of California and shall contain a clause that the policy may not be canceled until thirty (30) days written notice, return receipt requested, is mailed to City.

D. Additional Requirements. The procuring of such required policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant’s liability hereunder or to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto.

City shall notify Consultant in writing of changes in the insurance requirements. If Consultant does not deposit copies of acceptable insurance policies or endorsements with City incorporating such changes within sixty (60) days of receipt of such notice, Consultant shall be deemed in default hereunder.

E. Deductibles. Any deductible or self-insured retention over $25,000 per occurrence must be declared to and approved by City. Any deductible exceeding an amount acceptable to City shall be subject to the following changes: either the insurer shall eliminate or reduce such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers (with additional premium, if any, to be 8 paid by Consultant); or Consultant shall provide satisfactory financial guarantee for payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.

F. Verification of Compliance. Consultant shall furnish City with original policies or certificates and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by City before work commences. Not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date of any policy of insurance required by this Agreement, Consultant shall deliver to City a binder or certificate of insurance with respect to each renewal policy, bearing a notation evidencing payment of the premium therefore, or accompanied by other proof of payment satisfactory to City. Consultant shall provide full copies of any requested policies to City within three (3) days of any such request by City.

G. Termination for Lack of Required Coverage. If Consultant, for any reason, fails to have in place, at all times during the term of this Agreement, including any extension hereto, all required insurance and coverage, City may immediately obtain such coverage at Consultant’s expense and/or terminate this Agreement.

21. Indemnity.

A. Consultant assumes all risk of injury to its employees, agents, and contractors, including loss or damage to property.

B. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold free and harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers, at Consultant’s sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers arising out of the performance of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, of the work undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. The defense obligation provided for hereunder shall apply without any advance showing of negligence or wrongdoing by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, but shall be required whenever any claim, action, complaint, or suit asserts as its basis the negligence, errors, omissions or misconduct of the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors, and/or whenever any claim, action, complaint or suit asserts liability against the City, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers based upon the work performed by the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors under this Agreement, whether or not the Consultant, its employees, and/or authorized subcontractors are specifically named or otherwise asserted to be liable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Consultant shall not be liable for the defense or indemnification of the City for claims, actions, complaints or suits arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. This provision shall supersede and replace all other indemnity provisions contained either in the City’s 9 specifications or Consultant’s Proposal, which shall be of no force and effect.

C. No official, employee, agent or volunteer of City shall be personally liable for any default or liability under this Agreement.

22. Independent Contractor. Consultant agrees to furnish consulting services in the capacity of an independent contractor and neither Consultant nor any of its employees shall be considered to be an employee or agent of City.

23. PERS Eligibility Indemnification. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrar y, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qu alify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employ ment by City , including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

24. Notices. Any notice or communication given under this Agreement shall be effective when deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service and addressed to the contracting parties. Name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers of the parties are as follows:

City of Gardena:
1700 West 162nd Street
Gardena, California 90247-3732
Attn: Clint D. Osorio
Telephone Number: (310) 217-9503
E-mail: [email protected]

Consultant: TPA
Attn: Christopher Townsend, President
Telephone Number: (949) 278-1091
Facsimile Number:

E-mail: [email protected]

Either party may change the information to which notice or communication is to be sent by providing advance written notice to the other party. 10 25. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, in whole or in part, such provision shall be modified to the minimum extent necessary to make it legal, valid, and enforceable, and the legality, validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby.

26. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be deemed a contract under the laws of the State of California and for all purposes shall be interpreted in accordance with such laws. Both parties hereby agree and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California and that the venue of any action brought hereunder shall be Los Angeles County, California.

27. Waiver. No delay or failure by either Party to exercise or enforce at any time any right or provision of this Agreement shall be considered a waiver thereof or of such Party’s right thereafter to exercise or enforce each and every right and provision of this Agreement. To be valid a waiver shall be in writing but need not be supported by consideration. No single waiver shall constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver.

28. Entire Agreement.

A. This writing contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof; and the Parties have made no agreements, representations, or warranties either written or oral relating to the subject matter hereof which are not set forth herein. Except as provided herein, this Agreement may not be modified or altered without formal amendment thereto.

B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and to realize the purpose of this Agreement, the Agreement Administrator may issue a written modification to the Scope of Work, if this modification will not require a change to any other term of this Agreement.

29. Joint Drafting. Each party acknowledges that it has had an adequate opportunity to review each and every provision in this Agreement and to submit the same to counsel and other consultants for review and comment and that the parties jointly drafted this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement or any Assignment shall be construed more strictly against one party than the other party by reason that one or the other party proposed, drafted or modified such provision or any other existing or proposed provision.

30. Public Records Act Disclosure. Consultant has been advised and is aware that this Agreement and all reports, documents, information and data, including, but not limited to, computer tapes, discs or files furnished or prepared by Consultant, or any of its subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement and provided to City may be subject to public disclosure as required by the California Public Records Act (California Government Code section 6250 et seq.). Exceptions to public disclosure may be those documents or information that qualify as trade secrets, as that term is defined in the 11 California Government Code section 6254.7, and of which Consultant informs City of such trade secret. The City will endeavor to maintain as confidential all information obtained by it that is designated as a trade secret. The City shall not, in any way, be liable or responsible for the disclosure of any trade secret including, without limitation, those records so marked if disclosure is deemed to be required by law or by order of the Court.

31. Authority to Execute. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement.

32. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, or to declare the rights of the parties hereunder, the parties agree that the prevailing party in the legal action shall be entitled to recover attorney’s fees and court costs from the opposing party.

33. Section Headings. The Section headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall have no binding effect.

12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their names as of the day and year written below.

CITY OF GARDENA

By_____________________________
Clint D. Osorio, MPA
City Manager

Date_________________________

ACCEPTED: TPA, INC.

By_____________________________
Christopher Townsend, President

Date_________________________

ACCEPTED: TPA, INC.

By_____________________________

Date_________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CARMEN VASQUEZ, City Attorney

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 1 Table of Contents
Proposal for
Legislative Advocacy
and Grant Funding Services
February 7, 2022
([KLELW$

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 2

February 7, 2022 Clint Osorio, City Manager City of Gardena 1700 W. 162 Street Gardena, CA 90247 Dear Mr. Osorio: Thank you for the opportunity for Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. (“TPA”) to submit our proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services to the City of Gardena (“City”). Since its inception in 1998, TPA has earned the reputation as Champions for Better Communities by providing the experience, resources, and relationships expected from a premier legislative advocacy and grant writing firm while also giving clients the unique brand of customer service they deserve: personal attention, maximum accessibility, and passion for their mission. Our strategic approach to advocacy and funding is tailored to meet the individual needs of each client by leveraging the breadth and depth of our team as well as our vast network of relationships with key stakeholders and decision makers. Utilizing this method on behalf of our clients, TPA has shepherded over 100 legislative and regulatory proposals into law, and secured over $2.2 billion in grants from state, federal, and local government agencies as well as nonprofit foundations and private companies. Thank you again for your interest in our firm and your consideration of this proposal. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. We would be honored to serve the City of Gardena. Yours truly, Christopher Townsend President

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 3

ABOUT TPA TPA is a state and federal legislative advocacy and grant writing firm that provides lobbying and funding services to public agencies and nonprofit organizations throughout California. • Founder/Owner/President: Christopher Townsend • Advocacy Success: Shepherded over 100 client-sponsored legislative proposals into law • Funding Success: Over $2.2 billion in state, federal, and local government grants as well as grants from nonprofit organizations and private companies • Longevity: 23 years (founded in 1998) • Number of Employees: 16 • Number of Registered State and Federal Lobbyists and Grant Writers: 13 • Number of Offices: Five o TPA State Capitol Office, Sacramento o TPA Federal Office, Washington, DC o TPA Northern California Office, Oakland o TPA Central California Office, Fresno o TPA Southern California Office, Newport Beach • Types of Clients: o City Governments o County Governments o Water and Sanitation Districts o Transportation Districts o K-12 School Districts o Community College Districts o Parks and Recreation Districts o Fire Protection Districts o Museums, Science Centers, and Cultural Facilities • Areas of Specialization: o Local Governance (Cities, Counties, Special Districts) o Transportation Policy and Infrastructure o Water and Sanitation Policy and Infrastructure o Education Policy and Infrastructure o Housing and Economic Development o Parks and Community Facilities (Recreational, Cultural, Historical) o Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources o Public Safety o Budget and Finance • Ranking by Revenue Reported to the California Secretary of State: o 7th of 486 Firms Registered for 2019-20 Legislative Session o 98th Percentile

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 4 ABOUT TPA LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY ACHIEVEMENTS Policy Sector Issue Description Local Governance Local Control and Finance • Public Facilities and Finance • Public Employee Programs • Contractual Assessment Programs • Infrastructure Financing Opportunities Public Employee Benefits • PEPRA Compliance • JPA Benefits • Medical Benefits Vesting Cannabis • Drafting Local and State Cannabis Regulations • Local Control Transportation Local Streets and Roads • State Highway Relinquishments • Local Venue Signage on State Highways State Highway System • State Bond Funding for Highway Projects • Expansion of Toll Lanes/Toll Roads Water and Sanitation Water Quality • Drinking Water Public Health Regulations • Groundwater Pollution Liability • Groundwater Management Plans • Direct/Indirect Potable Reuse Water Infrastructure • State Bond Funding for Water Projects • Local Reliability Projects • Water Conservation Programs Sanitation Infrastructure • Integrated Regional Watershed Projects • Advanced Water Treatment Facilities Housing and Community Development
Affordable Housing • Developing Funding for Affordable Housing • Expanding Affordable Housing Eligibility Economic Development • Capital Investment Incentive Program Expansion • Enterprise Zone Program Regulations • Military Base Re-Use Land Planning Redevelopment • Agency Dissolution Process • Developing Post-RDA Funding Sources • State Liability Reduction Recreation and Natural Resources Park Facilities • Joint-Use Projects with Schools Districts • State Bond Funding for Local Park Projects (Propositions 11, 68, and 84) Greenhouse Gas Reduction • TOD Housing to Support Cap and Trade Objectives • Increase Transit Accessibility for Active Transportation Cultural and Historical Resources Cultural Facilities • CA Cultural and Historical Endowment • CA Nature Education Facilities Program Public Safety Public Health • Air Pollution Reduction Methods • Treatment of the Remains of a Deceased • Veteran Resources Crime Reduction • Sex Trafficking Control • Gun Control Local Law Enforcement • Increasing Local Police Presence/COPS • Police Body Cameras • Regional Public Safety Task Force Initiatives Education Community College Districts • Veterans Resources • Alternative Energy Job Training • ADA Reform K-12 School Districts • K-12 Safety Planning Programs • Joint Use Projects with Civic Agencies School Facilities • Charter School Facilities Funding • Community College Facilities Funding • K-12 School District Facilities Funding A DETAILED SCHEDULE OF OUR STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY ACHIEVEMENTS CAN BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 5 ABOUT TPA FY 2021-22 STATE BUDGET EARMARKS This table provides an overview of the budget earmarks that TPA secured on behalf of our clients in the State Budget for FY 2021-22. TPA strategized with our clients to identify priority projects and transform them into budget requests. TPA then worked closely and diligently with Members of the Assembly and Senate, their Budget Committees, the Governor’s Administration, and other key stakeholders to ensure our client projects were included in the final official budget. Client Name Project Amount Awarded City of Costa Mesa Regional Fire and Rescue Facility Improvements $2,500,000 City of Del Mar Del Mar Fairgrounds Operating Shortfall $3,500,000 City of Emeryville Affordable Housing Site Remediation $2,500,000 City of Farmersville Fire Engine Acquisition $750,000 City of Fremont Mission Blvd Interchange Modernization Project $7,200,000 City of Fullerton Hunt Library Restoration $2,750,000 Homelessness Recuperative Center $4,000,000 City of Half Moon Bay Carter Park Renovation Project $4,750,000 City of Hayward Hayward Navigation Center $662,000 South Hayward Youth Family Center Project $1,000,000 City of Irvine Bommer Canyon Fire Prevention Efforts $1,000,000 City of Lafayette Safe Pathway for Children Trail $238,000 City of Modesto Infrastructure Improvements to County Islands $5,000,000 City of Oakland Oakland Fund for Public Innovation for the California Entrepreneurship Capital in the Community Initiative $8,000,000 Local Jurisdiction Assistance for Cannabis Equity Program $9,905,020 Oakland MACRO Project $10,000,000 Port of Oakland Freight and Passenger Infrastructure Enhancements $280,000,000 City of Pismo Beach Public Safety Communications Equipment $470,000 City of Reedley Olson/Kings River Sewer Main Replacement $2,800,000 City of San Leandro Memorial Park Rehabilitation Project $2,750,000 City of San Pablo Alternative Policing and Mental Health Program $2,000,000 City of Santa Ana Youth Facilities Improvements $4,000,000 City of South San Francisco Vehicle License Fee Adjustment $3,000,000 City of Tracy Multi-Generational Recreation Center $5,000,000 City of Tustin New Emergency Backup Generator $1,500,000 Discovery Science Foundation Discovery Cube of Orange County Re-Opening Operating Expenses $2,040,000 Discovery Cube of Los Angeles Re-opening Operating Expenses $2,600,000 North Orange County Public Safety Task Force North Orange County Public Safety and Homelessness Task Force Program Extension $7,800,000 TOTAL FY 2021-22 STATE BUDGET EARMARKS $377,715,020

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 6 ABOUT TPA FY 2019-20 STATE BUDGET EARMARKS This table provides an overview of the budget earmarks that TPA secured on behalf of our clients in the State Budget for FY 2019-20. TPA strategized with our clients to identify priority projects and transform them into budget requests. TPA then worked closely and diligently with Members of the Assembly and Senate, their Budget Committees, the Governor’s Administration, and other key stakeholders to ensure our client projects were included in the final official budget. Client Name Project Amount Awarded City of Agoura Hills Stormwater Treatment Project $1,000,000 City of Avalon Underground Fuel Tank Removal and Replacement $500,000 City of Buena Park Historical Facilities Renovations $500,000 City of Costa Mesa Lions Community Park $1,000,000 City of Dinuba Water Well Replacement $1,000,000 City of Huntington Beach Multi-Use Blufftop Path $1,700,000 City of Laguna Beach Laguna Canyon Road Fuel Modification $1,000 City of Oakland Public Safety Projects $4,000,000 Bus Services $1,000,000 City of Selma Storm Drain, Storage, and Recharge $1,500,000 Discovery Cube of Los Angeles Natural Resources Pavilion $5,000,000 Discovery Cube of Orange County Property Acquisition/Parking Structure $10,000,0000 East Contra Costa Fire Protection District Equipment, Vehicles, and Facilities Acquisitions and Improvements $500,000 North County Transit District Del Mar Bluffs Stabilization Project $6,130,000 Tri Valley Cities Coalition Dublin Sports Grounds All-Abilities Playground $1,400,000 TOTAL FY 2019-20 STATE BUDGET EARMARKS $36,230,000 CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF STATE BUDGET EARMARKS FOR FY 2019-20 AND FY 2021-22: $413,945,020

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 7 ABOUT TPA FY 2021-22 FEDERAL EARMARKS TPA has demonstrated an ability to work with clients, their federal representatives, and the relevant congressional committees to deliver tangible benefits to our clients via the recently renewed federal budget earmark process. Officially referred to as Congressionally Directed Spending in the Senate and Community Project Funding in the House of Representatives, TPA has successfully inserted over $64 million in direct spending for our clients in the federal appropriations bills for FY21-22. TPA worked with our clients to develop and craft competitive applications, leveraging our relationships to advocate for those projects through the selection process with key federal representatives. Drawing on experience, relationships, and expertise TPA has positioned multiple clients to receive significant congressional directed spending. . $55,926,357House of Representatives appropriations bills for TPA clients $37,754,000House of Representatives INVEST in America Act for TPA clients $127,059,000Amount of TPA client earmarks submitted by Senator Alex Padilla $18,115,000Amount of TPA client earmarks submitted by Senator Dianne Feinstein

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 8 ABOUT TPA GRANT FUNDING ACHIEVEMENTS This table provides an overview of our grant funding achievements on behalf of our clients from state, federal, and local government agencies as well as private and nonprofit grant programs. These amounts represent grants secured through a competitive and/or legislative process and do NOT include any funds awarded to clients via formulas or related forms of funding entitlements. Policy Sector State Funding Federal Funding All Sources Water and Sanitation $126.6 Million $7.7 Million $134.3 Million Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources $126.1 Million $6.2 Million $132.3 Million Transportation $558.5 Million $101.7 Million $660.2 Million Housing and Development $694.8 Million $5.0 Million $699.8 Million Education $247.9 Million $44.8 Million $292.7 Million
Cultural Resources $120.0 Million $10.3 Million $130.3 Million Public Safety $96.8 Million $56.1 Million $152.9 Million TOTAL $1.971 Billion $231.8 Million $2.202 Billion A DETAILED 20-PAGE SCHEDULE OF OUR STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL GRANT FUNDING ACHIEVEMENTS CAN BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 9

RELATIONSHIPS STATE GOVERNMENT • City Legislative Delegation: o Senator Steven Bradford o Assembly Member Al Muratsuchi o Assembly Member Autumn Burke • Governor’s Administration and Agency Leadership: o Governor Gavin Newsom § Executive Secretary Jim DeBoo § Cabinet Secretary Ana Matosantos § Policy Advisor Joey Freeman o Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis o State Treasurer Fiona Ma o State Controller Betty Yee o Attorney General Rob Bonta o Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond o Secretary Wade Crowfoot, Natural Resources Agency o Acting Secretary Elissa Konove, California State Transportation Agency o Secretary Jared Blumenfeld, California Environmental Protection Agency o Secretary Lourdes Castro Ramirez, Business/Consumer Services/Housing Agency o Director Armando Quintero, Department of Parks and Recreation o Director Karla Nemeth, Department of Water Resources o Director Keely Bosler, Department of Finance o Director Gustavo Velasquez, Department of Housing and Community Development o Director Toks Omishakin, Department of Transportation § State Legislative Leadership: o Senate President Pro Tempore Toni Atkins o Senate Republican Leader Scott Wilk o Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon o Assembly Republican Leader Marie Waldron

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 10 RELATIONSHIPS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT • City Legislative Delegation: o Senator Dianne Feinstein o Senator Alex Padilla o Congresswoman Maxine Waters • President’s Administration and Federal Agencies: o White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs o Department of Agriculture o Department of Commerce o Department of Education o Department of Homeland Security o Department of Housing and Urban Development o Department of the Interior o Department of Justice o Department of Labor o Department of Transportation o Army Corps of Engineers o Bureau of Reclamation o Economic Development Administration o Environmental Protection Agency o Fish and Wildlife Service o National Marine Fisheries Service o National Park Service A DETAILED LIST OF OUR STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL RELATIONSHIPS CAN BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 11

CLIENT SERVICE TEAM TPA uses a strategic and comprehensive approach to legislative advocacy and grant funding that will be tailored to meet the specific needs of the City. With a team of 13 registered state and federal lobbyists and grant writers, TPA has the breadth and depth of experience AND the ability to deploy as many lobbyists and grant writers as needed to maximize success for the City. The proposed team for this engagement:

Christopher Townsend, President • 40 years of legislative and public policy experience and 23 years as the Founder and President of TPA • Provides strategic guidance and legislative advocacy and grant funding support for every client, including entities • Widespread bi-partisan relationships with Members and staff of the California Legislature, and with the Newsom Administration, including key officials in various agencies and departments • Maintains close bi-partisan relationships with several members of the California Congressional delegation, including Senators Feinstein and Padilla, and Representatives Lowenthal, Porter, Levin, Correa, Lee, Swalwell, Napolitano, Garamendi, Carbajal, Desaulnier, Sanchez, Lieu, Harder, McNerney, Calvert, Garcia, Steel, and Kim • Promotes funding for public infrastructure projects, including facilities for water and sanitation, transportation, education, public safety, housing and economic development, recreation, culture, and other community purposes

Niccolo De Luca, Vice President • 25 years of legislative and public policy experience, including serving under three consecutive Mayors in the City of Oakland • Secured significant grant funding and legislative directed funding for clients throughout California • Widespread bi-partisan relationships with Members and staff of the State Legislature, and with the Governor's Office, including key officials in various agencies and departments • Expertise in the policy sectors of public safety, cannabis, parks and recreation, natural resources, local government, cultural resources, and consumer affairs

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 12

CLIENT SERVICE TEAM

Andres Ramirez, Senior Associate • Experience working with local public agency clients throughout California • Secured significant legislative directed funding for clients throughout California • Widespread bi-partisan relationships with Members and staff of the California Legislature, and with the Governor's Office, including key officials in various agencies and departments • Expertise in several policy sectors including local governance, parks and recreation, transportation, housing, and economic development.

Alex Gibbs, Grants Manager • 10 years of legislative and public policy experience • Four years of experience working for the California Legislature analyzing, researching, writing, and shepherding bills through the legislative process • Secured significant grant funding for clients throughout California • Widespread bi-partisan relationships with Members and staff of the California Legislature, and with the Governor's Office, including key officials in various agencies and departments Expertise in the policy sectors of parks and recreation, local governance, public safety, transportation, cap and trade, and labor relations

Ben Goldeen, Senior Associate • 11 years of federal government affairs and public policy experience, including: o Legislative Director, Congressman Jim Costa o Legislative Assistant, Congressman Dennis Cardoza • Experience managing legislative activity, including bill analysis and research, particularly for federal funding opportunities • Experience with research, proposal development, and funding advocacy for various federal grant programs on behalf of local public agencies throughout California • Close relationships with key staff for numerous Members of Congress, as well as many federal agencies • Expertise in several federal policy sectors including water resources, healthcare, transportation, parks and recreation, and foreign affairs

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 13

CLIENT SERVICE TEAM

Sammi Maciel, Associate • Four years of legislative and public policy experience: o Field Representative, Senator Kamala Harris o Legislative Intern, Senator Dianne Feinstein • Widespread bi-partisan relationships with Members of Congress and their staff, and with the President's Administration, including key officials and staff in various agencies and departments • Expertise in the policy sectors of local governance, water resources, housing, transportation, parks and recreation, and cultural resources.

Carly Shelby, Legislative Associate • Three years of legislative and public policy experience: o Legislative and Policy Development Assistant, League of California Cities o Press Assistant, Office of Speaker Anthony Rendon • Widespread bi-partisan relationships with Members and staff of the California Legislature, and with the Governor's Office, including key officials in various agencies and departments • Expertise in the policy sectors of local governance, water resources, housing, municipal finance, parks and recreation, and cultural resources

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 14

LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SCOPE OF SERVICES TPA will utilize the following strategic and comprehensive approach to provide legislative advocacy services to the City: • Conduct Detailed Orientation: TPA utilizes a comprehensive onboarding process that includes extensive meetings with various relevant members of City leadership and key City departments to help develop a strategic plan that is carefully tailored to satisfy the needs of the City, as well as designed for maximum success in the current political climate and funding environment. • Develop Legislative Strategy: Utilizing the information gathered during the onboarding process, TPA will coordinate with the City to develop an official legislative platform and strategy that represents the City’s priorities in Sacramento and Washington, DC. This blueprint will be shared with key stakeholders in the State Legislature and Governor’s Administration as well as Congress and the Biden Administration. • Implement the Legislative Strategy: TPA will advocate for the City’s legislative agenda utilizing the following methods: o Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships: TPA has cultivated a network of valuable relationships that will be leveraged to promote the City’s legislative agenda. o Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan: TPA will engage various techniques to leverage our network of key relationships on behalf of the City: § Schedule meetings for the City to discuss relevant legislation § Prepare all briefing materials and talking points for the City § Brief legislative offices and stakeholders on the City’s legislative agenda § Follow-up on meetings to ensure commitments and deliverables are being met o Coordinate Advocacy Trips: TPA will work with the City to coordinate advocacy trips to Sacramento and Washington, DC to meet with the City’s legislative delegation, as well as legislators that serve on committees relevant to the City’s agenda. Furthermore, whenever possible, TPA will also schedule site visits by legislators to the City. o Track Legislation: TPA will identify, analyze, and monitor all bill introductions and amendments relevant to the City’s legislative platform and assess their potential impact on the City. o Craft Testimony and Position Letters: TPA will prepare and submit written and verbal testimony regarding legislation relevant to the City. TPA will also draft and deliver position letters to legislators and key officials on specific bill language.

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 15 SCOPE OF SERVICES o Draft Bill Language: TPA will draft language and amendments for relevant legislation, as required to protect and promote the City’s agenda. o State Budget Funding Opportunities: In an effort to maximize state funding, TPA will work with the City to identify projects and other funding priorities that may be suitable for funding through the State Budget. TPA will coordinate with the City to develop supporting materials for the budget request. TPA will also work with members of the City’s state legislative delegation, along with the Assembly and Senate Budget Committees, to gain support for the inclusion of the City’s project in the final State Budget approved by the Legislature. o Federal Earmark Opportunities: In an effort to maximize federal funding, TPA will work with the City to identify projects and other funding priorities that may be suitable for funding through the Federal Earmark process. TPA will coordinate with the City to develop supporting materials for the earmark request. TPA will also work with members of the City’s federal legislative delegation to gain support for the inclusion of the City’s project. • Provide Progress Reports: TPA will confer regularly with the City on our activities. TPA will provide timely electronic reports on the status of all legislative activity, such as bill language, amendments, and committee analyses. In addition to written reports, TPA will be available to the City for conference calls, in-person briefings, and meetings. • Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports: TPA will prepare and file, on behalf of the City, all applicable state and federal lobbying disclosure reports.

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 16

GRANT WRITING SCOPE OF SERVICES TPA will utilize the following strategic and comprehensive approach to provide grant funding services to the City: • Conduct Detailed Orientation: TPA utilizes a comprehensive onboarding process that includes extensive meetings with various relevant members of City leadership and key City departments to help develop a strategic plan that is carefully tailored to satisfy the needs of the City, as well as designed for maximum success in the current political climate and funding environment. • Craft Strategic Funding Plan: Utilizing the information gathered during the onboarding process, TPA will coordinate with the City to develop a proactive and comprehensive strategic funding plan that serves the needs of the City’s priorities. The plan will do more than simply identify City projects; it will outline and prioritize multiple funding options for each project, and develop a specific plan of work tailored for each project. It will also identify key “strings attached” to help assess the cost/benefit ratio for each grant opportunity. • Identify, Research, and Monitor Grant Funding Opportunities: TPA will utilize list-serve subscription programs, funding workshops, agency canvassing, and other networking tactics to ensure every potential opportunity is identified and reviewed for relevance with the City’s projects. TPA will then share these opportunities with the City for further assessment and determination if a grant application is warranted. The City will also receive a grant matrix of funding programs that is updated regularly as new opportunities arise. • Grant Application Development and Submittal: TPA will develop, draft, submit, and follow up on each City grant application through the following process: o Establishment of Clear Accountabilities: TPA will coordinate with the City to ensure the assignment of responsibilities and tasks are made clear so that confusion and inefficiency are avoided and the City is burdened as little as possible while TPA pursues a grant opportunity. o Provide Overview of Full Application Requirements: For each grant application, TPA will provide the City with a detailed overview of the requirements for the grant program and corresponding application to ensure that the program is a strong fit for the City’s project. This will include: § Application timeline § Eligible project types § Funding availability and award maximum and minimums § List of application components, including proposal questions and any required attachments

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 17 SCOPE OF SERVICES o Assemble Project Background and Details: TPA will conduct a detailed informational interview with City staff most involved with each project in order to gain a full understanding of the project background and scope details necessary for developing the grant proposal and addressing all application questions. o Coordinate Technical Project Details: For technical application components such as site plans, detailed cost estimates, project timelines, engineering plans, and cost-benefit analyses, TPA will coordinate with City staff to compile all necessary attachments and ensure consistency across all elements of the application. o Draft Written Proposal: TPA will fully draft all narrative components of the application and, when applicable, will indicate where additional input or project detail from the City could be provided during the proposal review process. o Incorporate Feedback to Finalize Proposal: Well ahead the of the application deadline, TPA will provide the City with a full draft for review and feedback. TPA will incorporate any additional details or revisions provided during this process to finalize the grant application and will obtain City approval for the final version of the application prior to submission. o Submit Completed Application: TPA will ensure that applications are submitted prior to the deadline, whether the submission is electronic or through hard copies, in accordance with submission instructions for each individual program. For hard copy submissions, TPA will print and package applications according to submission instructions and will ship applications through a reliable carrier service such as FedEx in order to provide the City with tracking and delivery confirmation for the application. TPA will also obtain a receipt for proof of submission and provide the City with a final copy of all submitted application documents. o Funding Advocacy: Throughout grant application process TPA will leverage relationships with relevant officials and program officers in various state and federal funding agencies to ensure that City grant applications are aligned with the goals of the specific grant program and that the applications are well-crafted and well-positioned for funding. • Post-Grant Submittal Advocacy: TPA will frequently contact legislators and agency officials to follow up on the status of a grant application and promote its need and urgency. This will include drafting letters of support after grant submissions and distributing them to legislators for their consideration. In addition, TPA will work with legislators to reach out to individual granting agencies to provide background on City’s projects and convey their support for those projects.

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 18 SCOPE OF SERVICES • Post-Award Grant Administration and Compliance: TPA will also assist, as needed, with post-award administration and compliance for all grant applications submitted by TPA on behalf of the City. This assistance will include interacting with granting agencies on behalf of the City, providing support for the drafting and submission of required reports, evaluations, and other tasks related to the successful monitoring of and compliance with the program requirements. • Comprehensive Follow-Up on Unsuccessful Applications: Despite all best efforts, some grant applications are not selected for funding. In those instances where grant applications are unsuccessful, TPA will work with the relevant state and federal funding agencies to set up in-person or telephone debriefing sessions to discuss the grant applications and how to best revise the grant applications for the next funding round to ensure success.

Proposal for Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services | City of Gardena Page 19

FEE SCHEDULE

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES FEE Legislative Advocacy and Grant Funding Services $7,000 Per Month* State and Federal Legislative Advocacy • Conduct Detailed Orientation Included • Develop Legislative Strategy Included • Implement the Legislative Strategy Included • Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships Included • Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan Included • Coordinate Advocacy Trips Included • Track Legislation Included • Craft Testimony and Position Letters Included • Draft Bill Language Included • State Budget Funding Opportunities Included • Federal Earmark Opportunities Included • Provide Progress Reports Included • Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports Included Grant Funding • Craft Strategic Funding Plan Included • Identify, Research, and Monitor Grant Funding Opportunities Included • Grant Application Development and Submittal Included • Establishment of Clear Accountabilities Included • Provide Overview of Full Applications Requirements Included • Assemble Project Background and Details Included • Coordinate Technical Project Details Included • Draft Written Proposal Included • Incorporate Feedback to Finalize Proposal Included • Submit Completed Application Included • Funding Advocacy Included • Post-Grant Submittal Advocacy Included • Post-Award Grant Administration and Compliance Included • Comprehensive Follow-Up on Unsuccessful Applications Included *The monthly fee includes all reasonable business and travel expenses City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 15.A
Section: DEPARTMENTAL

ITEMS - PUBLIC WORKS
Meeting Date: March 8, 2022

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:

Award Professional Services Contract for the Redondo Beach Boulevard Arterial Improvement Project, JN 945, to Cannon Corporation, in the amount of $520,985.

COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Staff Recommendation: Approve Professional Services Contract RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

The

2.1-mile stretch of Redondo Beach Blvd. from Crenshaw Blvd. to Vermont Ave. has the second highest traffic volume in our city. The area is predominant ly commercial and one of the
most progressive areas, yet the vast majority are Two-Way Left Turn Lanes (TWLTL) in the center. These
TWLTL combined with
hundreds of driveways from the commercial areas
encourages a lot of turning movements which severely compromises safety. The quality of traffic operation for the 9 intersections within the project limits continue to deteriorate with long traffic backups originating from 3 intersections. Vehicle movement is impeded not only during the morning and afternoon peak hours but also during lunch hour. The traffic signal equipment are old and obsolete and maintenance efforts are increasing exponentially.

To improve traffic flow, reduce congestion and enhance safety, the Public Works department applied for grants to address the worsening situation on Redondo Beach Blvd. In August 2020, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) awarded the City of Gardena the Design and Construction grant for Improvements along Redondo Beach Blvd. for $5,567,000. The City Council subsequently approved budget appropriation for this project on April 13, 2021.

To start the design phase of this project, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was drafted and distributed to engineering firms throughout California utilizing the Information Management System platform that specializes in government project notifications. Staff also contacted five Design Engineering Consultants on the City’s current On-Call services list. The proposals were required to be submitted in two separate sealed envelopes, one with the firm’s
qualifications and the other with firm’s fee proposal. O n January 10, 2022, four sets of
proposals were received and was evaluated
purely based on qualifications
while the fee
proposals were reviewed after the rating was completed.

The Director of Public Works, Principal Engineer and Associate Engineer evaluated the written proposals using the weighted criteria that includes team member experience, qualifications, project understanding, schedule, relevant project experiences, response to scope of services and level of effort and familiarity with the City's existing system. As a result, Cannon Corporation was rated the highest (89 out of a maximum 100 points).

Cannon Corporation assembled a team of Engineers and Architects that will be able to achieve the goal set forth for this project and their design services to include traffic signal upgrade and reconfiguration; traffic geometry reconfiguration through introduction of new medians and additional travel lanes; asphalt and concrete pavement rehabilitation; rehabilitation of concrete sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and ramps; landscaping; irrigation; and public outreach. Cannon Corporation and their sub consultants have previously completed successful design projects and several street improvements for the City of Gardena and is familiar with the City’s standards and requirements. After the rating, the fee proposals were opened for all four (4) firms ranging from $512,777 to $695,723. Cannon Corporation submitted the second lowest fee in the amount of $520,985 which is reasonable.

Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve a Professional Services Contract in a form approved by the City Attorney to Cannon Corporation for the Redondo Beach Blvd.

Arterial Improvement Project, JN 945, in the amount of $520,985.00.

FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:

Approved Grant Budget Amount: $5,567,000
Adopted City Budget Amount: $2,836,000 (FY 2020-21 & 2021-22) Funding Source: Measure M Multi Year Sub Regional Program ATTACHMENTS:

RFP_Redondo Beach Blvd Arterial Improvement Project_Rev1.pdf Agreement Gardena RBB 03-01-22 210432.pdf
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements Project_Cannon_01-20-22.pdf

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager

CITY OF GARDENA

PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

REDONDO BEACH BLVD ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
(JN 945)

DECEMBER 2021

Memoranda:

Proposal Due: January 20, 2022, 5:30 P.M.

Public Works Department – Public Works: (310) 217‐9568

REQUEST FOR RPROPSALS

ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES
for
REDONDO BEACH BOULEVARD ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, JN 945

OVERVIEW
The City of Gardena (City) is Requesting for Proposals (RFP) f rom qualified civil engineering firms (Consultant) to provide professional engineering services for the Redondo Beach Boulevard (RBB) Arterial Improvements Project between Crenshaw Boulevard and Vermont Avenue (Approximately 1.9 miles).

This project is funded through Measure M Multi ‐Year Subregional Program (MSP). The project’s primary goal is to improve traffic flow and reduce congestions at major intersections that feeds to it. The detail required services and performance conditions are described in the Scope of Work (or Services).

The Ci ty makes no representation or guarantee as to, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, or pertinence of the Reference Documents, and, in addition shall not be responsible for any conclusions drawn therefrom. They are made available to the Proposer for the purpose of providing such information as is in the possession of the City, whether or not such information may be accurate, complete or pertinent, or of any value.

An electronic copy of this RFP is available for download at the city of Gardena Website https://cityofgardena.org/rfps/. Questions regarding this RFP shall be directed to William Mendoza at (310) 217‐9608 or [email protected].

Deadline to submit a proposal is January 20, 2022 at 5:30 p.m. Three (3) hard copies and one complete PDF copy (on USB memory stick) shall be addressed to:

City of Gardena
Department of Public Works Engineering Division
1717 West 162nd Street
Gardena, CA 90247
Attn: William Mendoza, Associate Engineer
Proposal packages received after the deadline will not be accepted and will be returned unopened.

The City currently anticipates conducting the selection process in accordance with the following schedule.

This schedule is subject to revision and the City reserves the right to modify the schedule as needed or necessary.

RFP released December 8, 2021
Deadline for questions, clarifications January 13, 2022 Proposal due January 20, 2022
Consultant interviews (if necessary) February 2‐3, 2022 Consultant selection and Council award February 22, 2022

PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Gardena is seeking a consultant team to provide PS&E design services for the Redondo Beach Blvd Arterial Improvements Project from Crenshaw Blvd. to Vermont Ave. Redondo Beach Blvd serves as one of the primary east‐west arterial streets for the Gardena community servicing businesses, residents, as well as commute traffic between Interstates 405 and 110.

In August 2020, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) granted the City’s application for Design and Construction funding for improvement along RBB from Crenshaw Avenue to Vermont Avenue under Measure M MSP funds with a total project cost of $5,567,000.

The primary goal for any project under the Measure M MSP is to reduce vehicle delay. A preliminary Traffic Analysis (Attachment C) sh ows RBB ha ve numerous commercial and residential driveways resulting in excessive turning movements (left turns) between traffic signals. These movements impede the flow of through traffic and pose a safety issue. Additionally, the study identified intersections that have reached or are about to reach the threshold of minimum acceptable delay due to high traffic volume.

The project is to explore possible engineering solutions to the above issues , with reference to the preliminary Traffic Analysis, during the design phase. The consultant may choose to conduct additional studies either to explore other potential solutions or to augment the preliminary traffic analysis. One solution that has the most potential benefit is upgrading th e aging traffic signal system for the nine (9) intersections that are within the project area including its communication lines with the city’s Traffic Signal Facility. Another includes construction of new medians to manage the turning movements and adjusting the length of left turn lanes in the intersection s. Another option that should be investigated is adding a 3rd travel lanes in areas where back up appears by eliminating parking but will require outreach to business and property owners . The existing pa vement have different pavement condition ratings and therefore subject to various repair recommendations.

The City intends to award the design contract to the chosen consultant as soon as possible and hopes to complete the Design phase by the last quarter of 2022.

SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
The consultant should identify, include and explain the services they propose to provide to allow the City to achieve the completion of the project improvements identified and described herein. The consultant should include Traffic Engineering, Civil, Landscaping and Irrigation disciplines to its team.

1.0 Preliminary Engineering.

1.1 Project Coordination and Meetings.

The Consultant shall provide the necessary time to meet/coordinate with the City, adjacent jurisdictions and its community. City’s elected public officials, and other agencies and organizations relevant to the project.

Consultant shall commence with a kick‐off meeting with City staff. The project objectives will be discussed and confirmed. A project schedule shall be made and agreed upon. Lines of communication will be established, and specific task shall be clarified. The consultant shall schedule Regular Coordination and design progress meetings shall be performed as necessary throughout the duration of the project.

1.2 Records Research and Utility Coordination.

Consultant shall research and obtain available dat a needed including utility locations . City shall provide consultant with all Record drawings available. Consultant shall coordinate with utility companies to avoid conflicts with the proposed project improvements.

1.3 Topographic Survey and Base Sheet Preparation.

Perform Topographic survey with elevation cross sections at approximately 25’ intervals. The survey should also include right‐of‐way, centerline, lot lines, curb and gutter, median curbs, cross gutters, ADA ramps, driveway aprons, surface features, appurten ances, sewer rim/inverts, storm drain rim/inverts, elevations, etc. Survey cost shall include location of street monuments pre‐construction and reestablishment post‐construction.

1.4 Preliminary Engineering Research and Field Investigation and other traffic study as necessary.

Review, verify and or augment (as necessary) preliminary traffic study (Attachment C).

1.5 Preliminary Design Report summary.

Consultant shall summarize and consolidate all research findings, analysis, concepts and recommendations and prepare a schematic plan showing layout of the proposed medians and lane additions (if any) . The consultant, with the city staff, shall review , evaluate and correct said schematic and come up with a preliminary plan for presentation in the public outreach.

The consultant will then come up with a final preliminary schematic that will serve as the starting point in the next engineering design phase.

1.6 Public Outreach
Consultant shall make presentations and gather public input during the design process. For proposal purposes, the consultant can expect to host at least three (3) public meetings with community stakeholders to be held during evening hours. The consultant wil l lead these public meetings with presentations of project features, answers to public questions, provide color exhibits for display and a record summary of the meetings. The consultant shall make recommendations to the city resulting from such public outreach and incorporate them into the Final Design Phase upon request of the city.

2.0 Final Engineering Design Phase (PS&E)

2.1 Evaluate pavement condition and make recommendations for reconstruction.

2.2 Research and Utility Coordination.

2.3 Incorporate a stormwater mit igation plan for construction to the project and include in the PS&E.

2.4 Evaluate and make recommendations for Removal and Replacement of Curb, Gutter and sidewalk as necessary. Recommend construction of new ADA ramps where none exist or make existing ones compliant.

2.5 Preparation of final PS&E for submission to the city for approval and final construction documents.

2.6 Perform Construction observation during construction. CM&I excluded.

2.7 Preparation of as‐built plans after the completion of construction.

RFP SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
The City requires the proposer to submit a concise proposal clearly addressing all of the requirements outlined in this RFP. The proposal shall be signed by someone authorized by the proposer to execute a contract between the City and proposer. Proposal must include, at a minimum, the following sections; however, the proposer is encouraged to expand on the scope to fully address the project issues and deliver the completed improvements:

1. Methodology, Project Understanding, and Scope of Work – Description which enable the City of Gardena to assess the proposer’s experience and capability to perform the services as outlined in the Scope of Work in a structured and efficient fashion. Details with specific task descriptions to demonstrate that the proper has considered all aspects of the project and that the proper will cover them thoroughly. A list of the City’s responsibilities, if any, shall be included. Five pages maximum is allowed.

2. Potential Challenges – A description of the anticipated potential challenges that will be faced by the consultant and how your team is skilled and capable to address those challenges. Two pages maximum is allowed.

3. Personnel/Staffing Levels – Names of all team members and sub‐consultants, their roles for this project, and length of time with firm and in the industry shall be identified. Indicate whether your firm is a corporation , joint venture , partnership or sole proprietorship or a DBE . Indicate the name(s) of the owner(s) of your firm and number of years in business. An organization chart identifying the proposed team members shall also be included. Resumes of the individual(s) and sub‐consultants assigned to the project shall be provided as an attachment to the proposal. Two pages maximum per individual is allowed.

4. Representative Project Descriptions and Client Reference – Provide up to three examples of similar projects, including a respective brief description of proposer’s role(s) and responsibilities for each within t he last five years. Additionally, each example shall include the client’s contact name and telephone number. Five pages maximum is allowed collectively. Phone number shall be current, or the proposer will not receive credit for the reference.

5. Comments Regarding Contract (if any) – Submit comments, if any, to any clause(s) in the agreement that proposer objects to. Ensure that insurance and contract agreements can be met.

6. Hourly Breakdown by Task – The proposal shall provide a table that identifies each subtask and the number of hours assigned to each team member for this task. This provides the city with information on the consultant’s understanding of the level of effort needed for the project. The consultant will not be held to the allocation of hours by subtask as the project moves forward but, will be held to the not to exceed amount identified in the cost estimate of consulting fee.

7. Schedule – The proposal shall provide a schedule for the entire project and identify each deliverable in the sc hedule. The Consultant shall assume two weeks for City review of all draft documents. All other reviews will be completed within three to five business days.

8. Cost Estimates of Consulting Fee – Each proposal shall include project specific fees. The costs are to be broken down by tasks and subtasks listed in the Scope of Work and shall indicate the proposed level of effort by staff, sub ‐consultants, and other overhead costs. A fee schedule outlining hourly rates of the staff levels shall also be included. Consultant estimates shall be placed in a separate sealed envelope.

9. As applicable, submit a list of lawsuits filed within the past (5) five years against the firm’s Professional Liability Insurance policy (errors and omissions), if any. Accompanying each list shall be a declaration by a principal of the firm indicating careful review of such lists and adding appropriate information concerning the status or disposition of the lawsuits or claims. This information may be submitted separately and confidentially if so desired.

QUALIFICATIONS
The City intends to select the most qualified consultant available for this assignment that demonstrates a thorough understanding of the City’s needs and the ability to deliver the project in a reasonable timeframe and for a reasonable fee. It is imperative the Consultant’s proposal fully addresses all aspects of the RFP.

The proposal must clearly articulate the Consultant’s understanding of the project and the City’s specific requirements.

The City intends to rank the consultants based on the following factors (not necessarily listed in the order of importance):
• Project approach and understanding;
• Approach to potential challenges;
• Anticipated staffing levels;
• Qualifications and experience of proposed team members, including project manager and sub ‐ consultants, on similar projects;
• Length of time team members have been with the firm;
• Other similar project experience.

Follow‐up discussion or contract negotiations with selected consultant may be utilized to finalize the scope of work. If a contract cannot be negotiated with the highest ranked consultant for this project, the negotiations shall be terminated in writing and negotiations shall be started with the next highest ranked consultant.

GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS
By submitting a Proposal, the Consultant represent s that they have thoroughly examined and become familiar with the requirements of this RFP and can perform quality work to achieve the objectives of the City.

The City reserves the right to withdraw the RFP at any time without prior notice. The City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City reserves the right to extend the deadline for Propos als, postpone reviewing the Proposals for its own convenience, to reject any and all Proposals without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s), and to negotiate with any qualified consultant. The City does not guarantee successful firms will be provided any projects.

The successful consultant(s) and sub ‐consultants are required to obtain and maintain a City of Gardena business license and insurance. The license and insurance shall be maintained for the duration of the Agreement. A current business license is not a prerequisite for submittal of the proposal.

The City is not liable for any costs incurred by the Proposers before entering into a formal agreement.

Costs for developing the Proposal or any other such expenses incurred by the Proposer i n responding to this RFP and entirely the responsibility of the Proposer and shall not be reimbursed by the City.

The City is not responsible for Proposals which are delinquent, lost, incorrectly marked, sent to the wrong address, or sent by mail or courier service and not signed for by the City.

AGREEMENT & INSURANCE
The City’s Standard Consultant Services Agreement is included in Attachment A. The Consultant will be expected to enter into the Agreement without substantive changes. Any changes will require approval by the City Attorney.

The City’s standard insurance requirements is included as part of the St andard Consultant Services Agreement included in Attachment A.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – Standard Consultant Services Agreement (Sample) Attachment B – Measure M Highway Application Fact sheet Attachment C – Traffic Analysis

ATTCHAMENT A

(Sample) Standard Consultant Services Agreement

ATTCHAMENT B

Measure M Highway Application Fact sheet

ATTCHAMENT C

Traffic Analysis

Carmen Vasquez, City Attorney
mennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVaasa que z

Proposal for Proposal for
Redondo Beach Boulevard Redondo Beach Boulevard
Arterial Improvements Project Arterial Improvements Project (JN 945)(JN 945)
Cannon
Reliable Responsive Solutions
City of City of
Gardena Gardena
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
22 Gary Solsona, PE No. 68420 / Project Manager
11900 West Olympic Blvd., Ste. 530, Los Angeles, CA 90064  949.777.1580 📱 909.234.7857 2 310.664.8877
 [email protected]  CannonCorp.us
Larry P . Kraemer, PE No. C 44813 / Principal-in-Charge 1050 Southwood Drive, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
 805.503.4542 📱 805.7481352 2 805.544.3863
 [email protected]  CannonCorp.us
William Mendoza, Associate Engineer
City of Gardena
Department of Public Works Engineering Division
1717 West 162nd Street
Gardena, CA 90247
Subject: Proposal for Redondo Beach Boulevard Arterial Improvements Project, JN 945 Dear Mr. Mendoza:

After another year of the pandemic, the City of Gardena (City) continues its focus on strong business growth and development. This includes addressing increased traffic demands along a main thoroughfare of Redondo Beach Boulevard (RBB). The RBB corridor, between Crenshaw Boulevard and Vermont Avenue (approximately 1.9 miles), currently experiences extensive traffic congestion, including queues exceeding turning storage capacities, heavy volumes, and extensive vehicle delays. This high priority project will address the City’s traffic flow needs, reduce congestion along RBB and major connecting intersections, and provide vital access to State Route 91 and surrounding circulation system.

Our proposal outlines our team’s extensive experience in delivering similar roadway design projects, as well as our planned approach to make the RBB Project a success.

I, Gary Solsona, PE, QSD have personally worked with the City and am familiar with City standards and specifications.

With more than 20 years of providing municipal design services in various cities and jurisdictions in Southern California, I have extensive experience leading cohesive Cannon teams, including working with our subconsultants on this project; Iteris (led by Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA) providing traffic signal design services, and BGB Design Group (led by Art Guy, ASLA, CLIA) providing landscape architectural services for the new landscape/hardscape medians.

Our team offers a number of enhancements, recommendations, and a value-added approach to and for the project, which we have detailed in this proposal, including the following:
• Reduce or eliminate conflicts between left-turning vehicles accessing business/commercial driveways and through traffic on by adding a third lane (where feasible), upgrade traffic signals, and install new medians to improve traffic circulation.
• Enhance and unify the RBB corridor aesthetic by providing a cohesive, low water use landscape and hardscape median design.
• Promote stakeholder buy-in by proactively informing and actively engaging the public and business owners along RBB of the project improvements using photo simulations for the community and stakeholder meetings.

We are ready to start immediately on this important project. I am excited for the opportunity to lead our qualified team in working with the City, and I appreciate the opportunity to present our project approach and qualifications. The fees quoted in this proposal are valid for 60 days from this date and are based upon current California Prevailing Wages.

Sincerely,
January 20, 2022
We confirm receipt and acceptance
of the City’s addendum.

Larry P . Kraemer, PE No. C 448

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
33 Section 1 Methodology, Project Understanding,
and Scope of Work
Section 2 Potential Challenges
Section 3 Personnel/Staffing Levels
Section 4 Representative Project Descriptions
and Client Reference
Section 5 Comments Regarding Contract
Section 6 Hourly Breakdown by Task
Section 7 Schedule
Appendix Resumes
Statement of Past Claims
Table of Contents
Per the RFP , our cost proposal has been
provided as a separate attachment to
this proposal.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
44 Methodology, Project Understanding,
and Scope of Work
11 Project Understanding
The City of Gardena (City) wants to improve the flow of traffic and reduce congestion along Redondo Beach Blvd. (RBB) and the adjoining major intersections. This project will accomplish the City’s goals through adding a third lane, upgrading traffic signals, and installing new medians.

Our subconsultant, Iteris, prepared in 2019 a preliminary traffic study showing contributing factors of traffic volume increases on RBB, including commercial development
on properties along RBB. Several segments along RBB
decrease from three to two lanes, thus, impeding through traffic. Temporary safety measures along RBB, such as the makeshift median between Gramercy Place and Crenshaw
Boulevard, prevent vehicles from making illegal turns into and from the Roadium Open Air Market. The proposed
improvements will address these traffic-related safety
issues. Our approach to specific areas of this project is summarized as follows.

Traffic Analysis
This project builds upon Iteris’s 2019 RBB analysis and recommendations to improve safety and traffic operations along the corridor. This analysis, which comprehensively reviewed driveway and two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL)
usage, focused particularly on median implementation
and left-turn pocket extension locations. Iteris understands that certain conditions that have arisen since the previous traffic analysis report, such as the COVID-19 pandemic
as well as new restaurants and commercial uses, may
affect these recommendations. A supplemental review
of the area, in coordination with the City, may be needed to understand changes along RBB, particularly potential impacts to traffic operations that may inform proposed
median implementation. This review can include additional analysis that informs the median recommendations and
decision-making process.

Traffic Signal Upgrades
We have summarized project intersections, listed the
improvements (as detailed in the RFP), and noted
additional observations in Table 1.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS

PROJECT INTERSECTIONS ALONG RBB
Van Ness
Gramercy
Western
Denker
Nuani
Normandie
Raymond
Budlong
Berendo

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Replace westbound and eastbound signal poles to allow for additional signal heads to bring up to standards.          Remove median poles        
Install 2070 with Omni-eX and BBS         
Upgrade existing loop detection to video          Upgrade EVP         
Upgrade signal gear, conduits, and wiring          Upgrade signal cabinet foundation 

OBSERVATIONS
Overhead electrical wires on southside or westside    Relocate police CCTV and wireless equipment       Current mast arms are too short for left turn signal head placement  Traffic signal and service cabinets are in the middle of the sidewalk on the NW corner. Relocate to allow for ADA clearance   Relocate signal cabinet on SE corner to allow better ADA clearance    Remove Type I service on the power pole.

Install either new Type II or Type III service   
Table 1. Recommended Improvements and Observations
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
55 Landscape / Hardscape Enhancements
This project will include enhanced hardscape pavements, landscaping, and irrigation improvements for the new and existing medians along RBB. The City’s directive on the current Artesia Blvd. project, which Cannon is providing engineering design services for, includes eliminating the various incongruent hardscape materials. The City has
requested replacing existing hardscapes with Arizona
cobblestone and unifying the Artesia and RBB arterials
with a common material. These improvements will help
define the City boundary with quality and fitting material.

We will also explore other options at the City’s request.

Recommended upgrades to the existing landscaped
median adjacent to the Hustler Casino may involve
replacing the existing concrete hardscape with options
that provide visual continuity with the overall project. The existing corridor landscape is most notable at Vermont
St. and west towards Gardena Memorial Hospital. The
landscape on both sides of the street is accented with
attractive Queen, Mexican Fan, and King Palms (within
the existing median). Creating a cadence for trees within varying-length medians is not always straightforward.

Palm species with tall narrow statures in either formal or informal massed layouts will help address this challenge.

Considering today’s water conservation guidelines,
understory planting within medians can provide year-
around appeal. California native plants do not thrive in median conditions, and most have a dormant period.

Perennial grasses, which are popular in today’s landscapes, must be cut back yearly to spur new growth. This involves removing the spent leaves and creates an aesthetic
downtime.

Succulents offer a great solution to creating a fabric of varied color, texture, and form that thrives well in median conditions subject to road soot. Similar to the design
concept in our current efforts with the City’s Artesia Blvd. project, this approach can help reinforce the City’s identity along these arterials with year-around aesthetics. We
will give additional consideration to potential parkway enhancements for the continuation of street trees to
confirm local continuity (not the entire project reach), and we will address other potential enhancements to provide ADA compliance at specific project points.

Public Outreach / Community Meetings
We will assist City staff at public outreach meetings
with local community members and business owners.

We will provide information about the proposed street
improvements and obtain general input from attendees.

The following Cannon team members will attend all or
most of the community meetings:
• Gary Solsona, PE Project Manager, will provide
overall team continuity, guidance, and present /
answer questions regarding civil engineering and
street design issues as well as overall construction
phasing and scheduling.
• Art Guy, ASLA President of BGB Design Group,
will present and answer technical questions
regarding the hardscape, landscape, and irrigation
improvements to the new and existing medians.
• Paul Frislie, PE Principal Engineer of Iteris, will present and answer technical questions regarding
the traffic engineering and signal design.

The Cannon team has extensive experience in facilitating these types of community meetings, enjoys receiving
meaningful feedback, and will adequately respond to
questions about proposed impacts to businesses, access, parking, etc. Typically, community concerns involve the duration of the construction schedule and impacts of
frontage improvements. We will proactively coordinate
with the City to anticipate these types of questions that may be asked by the audience. Our team’s experience
with practical construction recommendations and realistic construction schedules will prove invaluable to City staff.

We will make it our duty to skillfully represent the project and promote the City’s efforts for favorable outcomes
with the City Council and the local business community, especially once construction along RBB is complete.

Project Methodology
Throughout the design process, our in-house engineers
will coordinate with our subconsultants. Project
memorandums and telephone conversations will be in
written format and distributed to each project personnel.

Team meetings are held weekly for in-house coordination and monthly or bi-monthly for outside subconsultants.

Meetings typically include the following:

Before beginning design of the 65% submittal, we
will meet with each subconsultant to review the
approved preliminary design report and associated
comments. The schedule for the 65% submittal and
critical items for the interface of each design area
will be discussed.

1.1. Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon 66 Prior to the 65% submittal, we will require initial
and secondary review check sets from each
subconsultant for review by the project manager.

At the initial subconsultant’s submittal, we will
complete critical interface and dimensional
coordination. We will return check sets to each
consultant with the project manager’s comments
and coordination notes.

Once the project manager’s comments have
been incorporated by each subconsultant, the
65% submittal sets will be returned to the project
manager along with the project manager’s latest
review set for back-checking, prior to the printing
deadline.

When the City returns the 65% submittal, the
drawings, reports, and review comments will be
copied to each subconsultant prior to the next
project meeting.

Upon notice to proceed with the 95% design
submittal, we will conduct a team meeting to
discuss required modifications based on review
comments, budget constraints, alternative
materials research, and in-house value engineering
input. Critical modifications will be discussed with
each subconsultant, and potential conflicts among
subconsultants will be resolved. We will provide a
schedule of intermediate submittals and the 95%
submittal to subconsultants.

When the City returns the 95% submittal, we will
copy the drawings, reports, and review comments
to each subconsultant prior to the next project
meeting.

Upon notice to proceed with the 100% design
submittal, we will conduct a team meeting to
discuss required modifications due to the review
comments and other controlling factors, such
as utility company relocation requirements.

Critical modifications will be discussed with each
subconsultant, and potential conflicts among
subconsultants will be resolved. We will provide a
schedule of intermediate submittals and the 100%
submittal to subconsultants.

Scope of Work
Phase 1.0 Preliminary Engineering

1.1 Project Coordination and Meetings: This task includes the kick-off meeting and progress monthly meetings with City staff by video conference. We will prepare meeting agendas and minutes.

1.2 Records Research and Utility Coordination: We will send preliminary utility notices for map requests and
second utility notices (with 90% plans) to verify facilities.

We will send out a final utility notice with approved plans, a tentative pre-construction meeting date, a tentative
schedule date for construction, and we will maintain a
utility log to track responses to notices.

1.3 Topographic Survey and Base Sheet Preparation:

We will obtain copies of record data maps, corner records, centerline tie notes, and benchmarks with Los Angeles
County. Our survey services will include the following:

Horizontal, Vertical, and Boundary Control - We will
establish project horizontal control based upon record
information and Leica Real Time GPS Network. The vertical control will be based upon Los Angeles County Benchmarks at or near the site.

Topographic Survey - Topographic survey will include the following:
• Gather Field Locations and Elevations: We will
take elevation shots every 100 feet for top of curb,
flow line, existing grade elevation of asphalt, edge
of gutter, grade breaks, and at the centerline. We
will then prepare 25-foot cross sections from this
collected data. We will exclude obtaining sewer and
storm drain inverts since these are not relevant to
the proposed street improvements.
• Compiling Topographic Survey Map: We will prepare
a detailed topographic survey map based upon
on the ground locations and elevations within the
defined mapping limits for the specified project
area. The mapping will include a scale of one inch =
20 feet or less; one-foot contours; fifty-foot, or less, spot elevations; and surface features from right-of-
way to right-of-way.

Monument Preservation - We will map found centerline
monumentation and create corner records memorializing
the position of these monuments. The corner records
will not show verification of what these monuments

3.3. 4.4.

5.5. 6.6.

7.7. 2.2.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
77 represent. There are several intersections of note within the project limits, and our proposed fee for pre- and post- construction is based on twelve total intersections.

1.4 Preliminary Engineering Research and Field
Investigation: We will provide a comprehensive field
review to note existing conditions that may affect the
design, access and traffic control concerns, potential
utility challenges, and construction challenges. We will also collect a photo-document log of the project site. Our re-evaluation of the 2019 Traffic Study will include the following tasks:

Traffic Volume/Turning Movement Data Collection - Iteris will review the existing traffic conditions and the level of service for each project intersection from the 2019 traffic analysis report. Because Iteris previously conducted traffic analysis for this corridor, we will focus on using previous traffic volumes and turning movement counts along each
signalized intersection and driveway/TWLTLs during the
AM and PM peak periods.

Since land use and traffic patterns have may have changed since the traffic analysis report publication in 2019,
we may identify locations along the corridor that need
additional data collection and evaluation. Our team will coordinate with the City to identify these locations and understand the level of effort required to use the previous work in addition to new data.

Accident Data Collection: We will review historical collision summaries and diagrams to identify potential signal
operation improvements required for increasing safety.

Traffic Analysis: Using the previously collected and
potentially supplemental traffic count data, Iteris will review and update the level of service (LOS) analysis of the corridor. Iteris will complete their review and updates using the delay-based Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)
methodology. The team will also update the midblock
driveway and two-way left-turn lane spreadsheets, as
needed, to account for new traffic data that may impact median left-turn/U-turn distribution assumptions. This
data will then be placed in supplemental analysis that will be provided using Synchro software.

Since Iteris completed the original analysis, we anticipate this analysis will be supplemental in review and largely completed by first reviewing the initial recommendations.

It will be updated only as needed to incorporate new
changes to traffic patterns and land uses in the area.

The traffic analysis will then be documented in a revised findings and recommendations analysis report that will be submitted to the City for review. The report will include lane configuration and traffic volume figures, updated
intersection count data, and Synchro output sheets within the appendix as well as revised or adjusted conclusions, if applicable. Additionally, we will incorporate drainage/best management practice (BMP) structures to address water
quality requirements.

1.5 Preliminary Design Report (PDR) (35% Plans and
Cost Estimates): The PDR will include recommendations
for traffic signal (technology, signal poles, wiring), median (landscape, hardscape, nosings, maintenance edges, and
small impassable / non-landscaped medians) and street
improvements (grind and overlay; digouts; curb, gutter, and sidewalk repairs; curb extensions; and curb ramp
upgrades). For the landscaped medians, we will illustrate two design solutions / plan palettes (including plant
imagery) for City review. We will establish irrigation points of connection, preferred irrigation equipment, preferred electrical source(s), and mainline / sleeving runs. We will prepare 35% level design plan and a preliminary opinion of estimate construction cost.

1.6 Public Outreach: We will provide a maximum of three photo-simulations of typical raised median landscape
conditions. We will coordinate with the City to determine the most appropriate vantage points.

Phase 2.0: Final Engineering Design Phase (Plans,
Specifications, and Estimates [PS&E])

2.1 through 2.3 65%, 95% and 100% PS&E:

The PS&E in this task will include the following:

Plans: We will include a title sheet, typical sections
and detail sheets (curb bulb-outs, sidewalk extension,
BMP structures), plan and profile of the median only,
signing and striping, traffic signal modifications and
details, communications, median hardscape layout and
construction details, and median planting and irrigation.

Specifications: We will prepare technical specifications based on the proposed improvements. We will provide
a bid schedule for items required by the plans, or items needed to accomplish the project construction in the
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
88 general provisions and include them in the Contractor’s bid list. We will reference special provisions to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Greenbook (2018). The
City will furnish the front-end contract and insurance
documents to complete the specification package.

Estimate: We will prepare an engineer’s construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take-off from the contract documents.

2.4 Signal Timing: Some tasks for signal synchronization will occur simultaneously and independently of the signal upgrades. This task will only be completed at the nine
project intersections, including Van Ness Ave., Gramercy Pl., Western Ave., Denker Ave., Nuanu Dr., Normandie
Ave., Raymond Ave., Budlong Ave., and Berendo Ave.

Field Inventory: Iteris will collect pertinent information, such as speed surveys, collision history, and agency
timing preferences that will support the signal timing
activities. Iteris will also conduct fieldwork at each
intersection to take digital pictures, measure crosswalk distances, and collect intersection phasing and
controller cabinet information. Bicycle distances will be measured per the City’s preference. Iteris will prepare a technical memorandum detailing the findings of the
fieldwork, summarize data collected, identify planned
or programmed improvements, and develop low-cost
improvements to enhance traffic operations. The fieldwork for this signal timing task will be provided in conjunction with the field work for the PS&E as identified in 1.4.

Basic Timing Calculations: Before conducting signal timing optimization, Iteris will complete basic timing calculation analysis for each intersection along the study corridor.

Iteris will use data collected from the field inventory task and the latest version of the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (CA MUTCD) to review vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle clearance timing parameters.

Existing Network Modeling: Using counts and data
collected, Iteris will generate Synchro Version 10 networks for peak periods (morning, mid-day, and evening) for
City review and comments. Once the network files are
approved, Iteris will develop the proposed cycle lengths and optimized network models.

Proposed Network Model: Iteris will meet with the City
to review the results of the basic timing analyses before proceeding with timing optimization. The optimization
of project corridors in the City is distinct in that, though the project is for one corridor, each major crossing and neighboring corridor is just as important, especially if it was recently or is soon to be coordinated.

A lesson learned that we will implement in this task to facilitate improvements, is increasing the emphasis on
potential modifications of fixed or crossing corridor during the cycle length analysis. Upon approval of signal grouping and cycle lengths, the detailed optimized timing will be provided in Synchro and Tru-Traffic format for review and approval.

New Timing Implementation: Iteris will be available to
implement the timings in the field or at the City’s Traffic Operations Center in QuicNet, depending on when the City approves the implementation of new timing. Iteris staff can also load the controllers with the desired timing and run a test in the lab before implementing them in the field.

Iteris will coordinate with City staff to confirm minimal disruption during implementation. Each uploaded signal
database will be archived before making changes, and a
copy of the downloaded timing will also be saved to PDF to record the changes made.

Fine Tuning: The field fine-tuning task will begin
immediately after the timing is implemented. This will
confirm timing is running as modeled and that there are no significant delays, especially for the side streets and left turns. Iteris will use the Tru-Traffic software to provide the participating agencies with historical data during the travel runs and to identify reasoning for modifications requested during the fine-tuning task. Modifications will be recorded and updated onto the Synchro networks to generate a final fine-tuned network.

Phase 3.0: Construction Support and Phase 4.0: Post-
Construction Support:

This phase includes the following:
• Attend pre-construction meeting (1 included)
• Review contract submittals (10 included)
• Respond to requests for information (10 included), and • Provide construction observation (4 site visits
included).

We will draft revision clouds around construction revisions (based on City-provided Contractor redlines), and will
submit ACAD files and a PDF copy of the final as-builts for the City’s records.

CannonCannon
99 Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements
Potential Challenges
22 © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS Based on our review of the RFP, the Measure M Funding Agreement, the Iteris 2019 Traffic Analysis and field visits along RBB, we’ve identified the following potential challenges: sidewalks discontinuities, curb ramp upgrades at business entrances, maintaining emergency vehicular access with new medians, The exhibits provided herein illustrate how we will address these challenges.

POTENTIAL CHALLENGES
Based on our review of the RFP , the Measure M Funding Agreement, Iteris 2019 Traffic Analysis, and field visits along RBB, we’ve identified the following potential challenges: sidewalks discontinuities, curb ramp upgrades at business entrances, and maintaining emergency vehicular access with new medians. We have illustrated how we will address these challenges in the following Exhibit on pages 9-10.

Exhibit No. 1 Potential Challenges and Proposed Solutions CannonCannon
1010
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements
© 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS © 2022 Microsoft Corporation © 2022 Maxar ©CNES (2022) Distribution Airbus DS MEDIAN CURB TO MAINTAIN EMERGENCY VEHICULAR ACCESS.

MOUNTABLE CURBS ARE INCLINED SO THAT EMERGENCY VEHICLES CAN SAFELY MOUNT THEM AT CRAWL SPEED.

WE WILL ALSO CONSIDER ROLLED OR MOUNTABLE

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
1111
Personnel/Staffing Levels
33 Cannon Corporation- Providing Reliable Responsive Solutions since 1976 San Luis Obispo
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
 805.544.7407
2 805.544.3863
Los Angeles
11900 West Olympic Blvd.

Ste 530
Los Angeles, CA 90064
 310.664.1166
2 310.664.8877
Irvine
16842 Von Karman Ave.

Ste. 150S
Irvine, CA 92606
 949.753.8111
2 949.753.0775
Bakersfield
4540 California Ave.

Ste. 550
Bakersfield, CA 93309
 661.328.6280
2 661.328.6284
Experience Counts
We offer expertise in the following areas relevant to your project:

Utility Coordination
Design and CM Services
Water Main Construction
and Installation
ADA-Compliant Curb
Ramps and Crosswalks
Pavement Assessment
and Rehabilitation Design
Street Light Upgrades
As a full-service engineering design, construction
management, surveying, and landscape architecture
firm, we take pride in our ability to offer clients a broad range of services. Our commitment to providing clients
Reliable Responsive Solutions, whether the project scope is expansive or more specialized, spans 46 years.

During this time, we have worked with many cities,
counties, and agencies to maintain secure and dependable water and wastewater systems, make streets safer and
more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly, and construct
buildings and facilities that are structurally sound.

Likewise, we are dedicated to providing a high level of technical expertise in areas of low impact development
(LID) design. These characteristics have been an integral part of the infrastructure improvement projects we have completed throughout California.

Cannon actively supports our clients by continuously
working to find the “right” solution for each individual project. To do this, we employ a team of professionals
including the following:
• Registered Civil, Structural, Mechanical, and
Electrical Engineers
• Licensed C-10 Electrical Contractor
• Qualified Stormwater Developers and Practitioners
• Pipeline Experts and Directional Drill Inspectors
• Resident Engineers and Construction Managers
• Qualified Stormwater Developers and Practitioners
• LEED Accredited Professionals
Ventura
93 South Chestnut St.

Ste. 202
Ventura, CA 93001
 805.544.7407
2 805.544.3863
Washington
1700 NW Gilman Blvd.

Ste. 100
Issaquah, WA 98027
 425.677.2323
Cannon Corporation Information
• Federal Tax ID:
77-0246249
• State Tax ID: 34997544
• DIR ID: 1000001861
• C-10 Contractor’s
License: 970186
• California Business
License: C1475706
• Small Business-Public
Works Certification
ID: 4979
Majority firm owners that own more than 2% of the
company include: Mike Cannon, Dan Hutchinson, and
Chad Engelskirger.

Services for the City of Gardena will be provided primarily from our Los Angeles office. Our office locations include the following:

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
1212
Redundancy of Staff
In addition to our key project
team members in the
organizational chart, Cannon
is home to comprehensive
engineering design staff
who are ready to commence
project work immediately.

City of Gardena
Organizational Chart
We present a steamlined organization with Gary Solsona, PE, LEED AP as Project Manager and the City’s point-of-contact.

Each team member was selected based on their areas of expertise and history completing street improvement projects.

We have provided additional information about our team members, including years of industry and firm experience, in the resume section in the Appendix of this proposal.

Project Manager
Gary Solsona, PE, QSD
No. 68420 - BS, Civil Engineering,
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona, CA
Principal-in-Charge and
QA/QC Manager
Larry Kraemer, PE
No. 44813 - MS, Water
Resources, California State
University, Long Beach, CA
Senior Engineer
Marco Canta, PE
No. 69244 - BS, Civil Engineering,
Louisiana State University, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana
Design Engineers:

Karena Diep, EIT
No. 170694- BS, Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Irvine, CA
Zachary Fisher, EIT
No. 172883 - BS, Civil
Engineering, Brigham Young
University, Provo, UT
Allyson Marnocha
MS, Civil Engineering, Northern
Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ
Subconsultants:

Traffic Control
Paul Frislie
Landscape
Art Guy
Subconsultant Firm Information
Iteris, a publicly traded corporation,
is the market leader in smart mobility
infrastructure management since 1987. Iteris’s 440+
staff have decades of expertise in traffic management,
along with superior services and patented products
that help detect, measure, and manage traffic and
vehicular performance, minimize traffic congestion,
enhance safety, and empower Iteris clients with
solutions to better manage their transportation
networks.

Founded in 1979 and
incorporated in 1998, BGB Design
Group serves public and private clients and is known for the individual attention they pay to each design commission.

Their principals and staff offer an array of experience and abilities over a wide range of project types, including parks, creek restoration, trails, libraries, civic centers, and related public facilities. As leaders in the field of Green Development, they have received recognition from agencies, such as the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

Surveyor
Aaron Tillmanns, PLS
No. 9584 - 40-Hour
Hazwoper Training
Course

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
1313
Key Personnel
Gary Solsona, PE, QSD Project Manager
 949.777.1580 📱909.234.7857 4 4949.753.0775  [email protected] Mr. Solsona will serve as Project Manager for the Redondo Blvd. Improvements. Mr. Solsona has more than 19 years of experience managing and designing roadway improvements, drainage, sewer, ADA design, sound walls and retaining walls, and preparing project study reports. He is a recognized expert in ADA design and has provided ADA presentations for several local agencies in Southern California. As Public Works Manager at Cannon since 2017, Mr. Solsona exhibits a superior level of creativity and foresight and applies his extensive knowledge to complex projects.

Larry Kraemer, PE Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Manager As Principal-in-Charge and QA/QC Manager, Mr. Kraemer draws from more than 35 years of varied civil engineering experience to make decisions and recommendations regarding Cannon’s engineering planning, design, construction, administrative, and related activities. With more than 20 years with Cannon, Mr. Kraemer has helped develop the firm’s quality control and quality assurance workflow processes and will apply this knowledge to the City’s street improvement project.

Marco Canta, PE Senior Engineer
Mr. Canta has 18 years of professional civil engineering experience and has worked on various projects in public works, roadway, drainage, utilities, and site design throughout Southern California. Mr. Canta has served as Project Manager for water districts, major international airports, local municipalities, private development, and public agencies. He has knowledge of AASHTO, Caltrans SPPWC, Los Angeles County, and MUTCD standards. He is technically proficient with Civil 3D, MicroStation, InRoads, StormCad, Flowmaster, and HydroCalc.

Karena Diep, EIT Design Engineer
Ms. Diep brings 2 years of experience working on various projects within both the public and private sectors, including street improvement, water improvement, sewer improvement, and BMP layouts.

She is responsible for tasks including drafting, field reviews, and preparing cost estimates. Ms. Diep has worked with numerous agencies and municipalities throughout Southern California, such as City of Fullerton, City of Anaheim, and Port of Long Beach, and is thoroughly familiar with their agency regulation and design standards.

Zachary Fisher, EIT
Mr. Fisher has been developing civil engineering experience in the public sector since 2017. His experience includes preparing design plans for water, sewer, and stormwater relocations, replacements, and upgrades, as well as roadway widening and rehabilitation. He is proficient at AutoCAD and is responsible for tasks, including utility coordination; construction observation; plan check services; and providing support with designing, detailing, and preparing plans and construction documents.

Design Engineer
civil engineering exp
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
1414
Representative Project Descriptions and
Client Reference
44 Newport Avenue
Grover Beach, California
The City of Newport (City) needed to improve streets for the voter approved Measure K (K-14) program. The project involved traffic calming and pedestrian safety measures, which included pavement structure, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; ancillary facilities such as landscaping and irrigation; lighting features and structures; and accessible corner ramps, striping, and medians. Cannon provided the City Council with alternatives for narrowing concepts to reduce construction and maintenance costs.

Newport Avenue was initially part of the overall roadway rehabilitation construction documents, but was later moved to a stand-alone project. Cannon was selected to provide design, bidding, and construction phase support services. Additional design considerations included grading and drainage improvements for 46 traffic calming bulb-outs, improvements to pedestrian travel, methods to reduce construction costs, and modifications to the existing roadway alignment and cross slopes, including design of a chicane and a 1-mile roadway rehabilitation. The re-striping of roadway also included parking protected and buffered bike lanes.

Client Reference
Gregory Ray, PE Public Works Director
City of Grover Beach
154 South Eighth St., Grover Beach, CA 93483
 805.473.4520
 [email protected]
Artesia Boulevard Arterial Improvements
Gardena, California
The City of Gardena (City) wanted to upgrade traffic signals and replace existing medians along Artesia Boulevard, from Western Ave to Vermont Ave, with a new decorative hardscape paving solution. Based on prior discussions with City staff, the Cannon team (including subconsultant BGB Design Group) evaluated and presented four paving solutions to the City: grouted river cobble, exposed concrete, concrete unit pavers, and staining/sealing the existing stamped concrete.

The City subsequently decided to move forward with the cobblestone paving solution, which Cannon incorporated into the final design plans, specifications, and cost estimate.

Our team prepared a design study (exhibit) to convey the proposed limits of added or deducted hardscape for City direction. Following approval of the conceptual design direction, we completed revisions to the previously submitted 95% design plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E). This consisted of the Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Plans Demolition Plan, Landscape and Irrigation Plan, Planting Plan, Technical Specifications and Cost Estimate.

Client Reference
William Mendoza, PE Associate Engineer
City of Gardena
1717 West 162nd Street, Gardena, CA 90247
 310.217.9608
 [email protected]
Completion Date:

Active Project
Completion Date:

February 2019
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
1515
Sherwood Road Reconstruction
and Signalization
Paso Robles, California
The City of Paso Robles (City) was assigned funding for Sherwood Road, located along the eastern city limits, for street repairs as part of the half-cent sales tax measure. Sherwood Road was designated as a Tier 2 street, which required more than a simple overlay for repair. The City desired to design the roadway to reduce future maintenance cost, create a gateway corridor for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and reduce stormwater flow.

The City selected Cannon to provide design engineering and construction management, inspection, and materials testing services. We prepared three conceptual design alternatives for the reconstruction of Sherwood Road. These alternatives included reducing the overall pavement width and removing parking along the north side, providing two travel lanes while maintaining the existing bike route, and providing a low-maintenance landscaped parkway along the northern sidewalk. The project also included the design and installation of ADA-compliant ramps and a review of potential traffic-calming features. Where feasible, Cannon incorporated Low Impact Development (LID) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) practices and principles.

Additionally, Cannon to identified approximate locations of existing street trees via aerial survey, and identify potential for additional street trees and/or ornamental or bioswale plantings within right-of-way.

Landscaping and hardscape alternatives included pervious hardscape, conceptual street, and ornamental planting palette composed of drought-tolerant and California native bioretention planting.

Client Reference
Ditas Esperanza, PE, Capital Projects
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446
 805.237.3861
 [email protected]
Completion Date:

June 2019
Full depth reclamation (FDR)
was used for this reconstruction
project, which included a new
signalized intersection.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
1616
Comments Regarding Contract
55 Cannon neither has any comments regarding this contract nor do we object to any clauses in the agreement. We will meet the insurance and contract agreements stated in the City’s RFP .

CannonCannon
1717
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements
Hourly Breakdown by Task
66 City of Gardena
Redondo Beach Blvd Arterial Improvements Project
(JN 945)
Hours Estimate
Cannon
16842 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92606
949.753.8111
57 255
28 12
4 85
271
1 4
28 1
21 464
325
118
327
2,791
(Principal-In-Charge)
(Principal Engineer)
(Senior Principal Engineer)
(Design Engineer)
(Engineering Assistant)
CannonCannon
1818
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements
Schedule
77

We are committed to meeting project schedules and deliverable deadlines. The following schedule is based on careful evaluation of the project, its objectives and scope, and the logical sequencing needed to adequately complete the City’s project. Every effort has been made to propose a realistic schedule that allows appropriate time frames. Additionally, the milestone durations in this schedule include the City’s required two-week review time.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
AppendixAppendix
Resumes
Statement of Past Claims
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Resumes
Professional Registration
• Registered Civil
Engineer, California, No.
68420
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering,
California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona, California
Professional Affiliations
• American Public Works
Association
• American Society of Civil
Engineering
• Filipino American
Society of Architects and
Engineers
Years With Firm
• 5
Mr. Solsona has 19 years of civil engineering experience in public works design, consisting of award-winning roadway widening, street rehabilitation and intersection improvements; sound wall and retaining wall design, preparation of traffic control plans and project study reports, and is recognized in the industry as an ADA design specialist. His proactive approach is carried out seamlessly through project management, engineering design development, and construction support services to public agencies throughout Southern California and he has a proven track record in providing innovative, cost-saving, and sustainable solutions (such as alternative pavement rehabilitation methods, including full depth reclamation and cold-in- place-recycling) on numerous street improvement projects for major arterials and residential streets.

Artesia Boulevard Arterial Improvements, Gardena, California: The City of Gardena wanted to replace existing medians along Artesia Boulevard, from Western Avenue to Vermont Avenue, with a new decorative hardscape paving solution. Based on prior discussions with City staff, the Cannon team (including subconsultant BGB Design Group) evaluated and presented four paving solutions to the City. Our team prepared a design study (exhibit) to convey the proposed limits of add or deducted hardscape for City direction. Following approval of the conceptual design direction, Cannon completed revisions to the previously submitted 95% design plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E). Mr. Solsona served as Project Manager.

Newport Beach Concrete Street Pavement Reconstruction, Newport Beach, California: The City of Newport Beach selected Cannon to provide civil engineering and survey services to reconstruct several deteriorated concrete streets and mitigate existing drainage issues on the Balboa Peninsula. The project consisted of removing and reconstructing concrete pavement, reprofiling of curb and sidewalks, new storm drain system, landscaping, and reconstruction of existing curb ramps for compliance with ADA standards. Cannon researched utility lines located within the four streets, including water, gas, sewer, electrical, and telecommunication lines, and prepared a utility coordination log. Mr. Solsona served as Project Manager.

Select Project Experience Summary
Mr. Solsona has served as Project Manager, QA/QC
Engineer, or Project Engineer on the following projects:
• Jamboree Road Improvement Project, Irvine,
California
• Cerritos Avenue Sidewalk Gap Closure, Anaheim,
California
• San Juan Water Main Replacement and Street
Reconstruction Project, Fullerton, California
• City of Lake Forest ADA Ramp Improvements,
Phases 9, 10 and 11, Lake Forest, California
Gary Solsona, PE, QSD Project Manager
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Professional Registration
• Registered Civil
Engineer, California, No.
44813
Education
• Master of Science, Civil
Engineering - Water
Resources, California
State University, Long
Beach, California
• Bachelor of Science,
Agricultural Engineering,
California Polytechnic
State University, San
Luis Obispo, California
Professional Affiliations
• American Society of Civil
Engineers
• American Water Works
Association
• American Public Works
Association
• California Water
Environment Association
• Water Environment
Federation
• WateReuse Association
• Institute for Sustainable
Infrastructure
Years With Firm
• 21
As Principal-in-Charge Mr. Kraemer makes decisions and recommendations recognized as authoritative that have a far-reaching impact on Cannon’s engineering design, construction, administrative, and related activities. He negotiates critical and controversial issues along with other Senior Principal engineers and officers of other companies or organizations. In addition, Mr. Kraemer exhibits a superior level of creativity, foresight, and judgment in planning, organizing, and guiding project teams and engineering programs. Recognized as an expert in one or more specialties, he applies his extensive knowledge to complex projects and assumes responsibility for the department of public infrastructure at Cannon.

Newport Avenue, Grover Beach, California: The City of Newport needed to improve streets for the voter approved Measure K (K-14) program. The project involved traffic calming and pedestrian safety measures, which included pavement structure, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; ancillary facilities such as landscaping and irrigation; lighting features and structures; and accessible corner ramps, striping, and medians.

Cannon was selected to provide design, bidding, and construction phase support services. We provided the City Council with alternatives for narrowing concepts to reduce construction and maintenance costs. Design considerations included grading and drainage improvements for 46 traffic calming bulb-outs, improvements to pedestrian travel, methods to reduce construction costs, and modifications to the existing roadway alignment and cross slopes including design of a chicane and a 1-mile roadway rehabilitation. The restriping of roadway also included parking protected and buffered bike lanes. Mr. Kraemer served as Project Manager.

Sherwood Road Reconstruction and Signalization, Paso Robles, California: The City of Paso Robles (City) was assigned funding for Sherwood Road as part of the half-cent sales tax measure. The City desired to design the roadway to reduce future maintenance cost, create a gateway corridor for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and reduce stormwater flow. Cannon was selected to provide design engineering, construction management, inspection, and
materials testing services. We prepared three conceptual design alternatives for the road, designed and installed ADA-compliant ramps, and reviewed traffic-calming
features. Mr. Kraemer served as Principal-in-Charge.

Select Project Experience Summary
Mr. Kraemer has served as Project Manager,
Principal-in-Charge, or District Engineer on the
following projects:
• 4th Street Phase II Project, Santa
Monica, California
• Measure K Street Rehabilitation/Repair
Program, Grover Beach, California
• Design for Blosser Road Bioretention
Project, Santa Maria, California
• 12th Street Green Street
Improvements, Paso Robles, California
Larry Kraemer, PE Principal-in-Charge
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Professional Registration
• Registered Civil
Engineer, California, No.
69244
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering,
Louisiana State
University, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana
Memberships and Affiliations
• City and County
Engineers Association
• Asian American
Architects and Engineers
• American Society of
Civil Engineering (ASCE),
Younger Member Forum
- Served as Membership
Coordinator
Years With Firm
• 2
Mr. Canta has 18 years of professional civil engineering experience and has worked on various projects in public works, roadway, drainage, utilities, and site design throughout Southern California. Mr. Canta has served as Project Manager for water districts, major international airports, local municipalities, private development, and public agencies. He has knowledge of AASHTO, Caltrans SPPWC, Los Angeles County, and MUTCD standards. He is technically proficient with Civil 3D, MicroStation, InRoads, StormCad, Flowmaster, and HydroCalc.

City of Manhattan Beach Pedestrian Improvement Project, Manhattan Beach, California: The City of Manhattan Beach wanted to improve incomplete pedestrian crosswalks that were lacking adequate visibility for motorists. These crosswalks serve as major routes for residents and tourists visiting the Manhattan Beach, Oak Park, Joslyn Center, and other City destination. The proposed improvements included new, rectangular rapid flash beacons (RRFB) and pedestrian signs; striping; raised curb islands; in-road warning lights system; and an ADA compliant curb ramp. Cannon was selected to provide utility coordination; topographic survey; and preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the ADA curb ramp, sidewalk, roadway pavement, and raised curb island improvements. This project enhanced safety at high-flow crossings and increased visibility and awareness for drivers and pedestrians. Mr. Canta served as Project Manager.

Lakewood Blvd. and Firestone Blvd. Intersection and Lakewood Blvd. and Imperial Highway Intersection Improvements Project, Downey, California: These City of Downey projects were part of the I-605 Hotspots Improvements Program to provide roadway improvements along the I-605 corridor. The project scope involved adding dual left turn lanes at Lakewood Blvd., reconstructing the intersection to concrete pavement, signing & striping, modifying the traffic signals, constructing decorative crosswalks, constructing ADA curb ramps, landscaping, and irrigation. Mr.

Canta served as the Project Manager for the prime engineering consultant and managed the preparation of roadway plans.

He also managed and coordinated the design with traffic, environmental, and landscaping subconsultants.

Select Project Experience Summary
Mr. Canta has served as Project Engineer on the following projects:
• San Juan Water Main Replacement and
Street Reconstruction Project, Fullerton,
California
• Broadview St. and Brookhurst St. Sanitary
Sewer Improvements, Anaheim, California
• Brea Canyon Road Strorm Drain
Replacement, Diamond Bar, California
• LAX Consolidated Rent-A-Car Facility
project, Project, Los Angeles, California
• Plan Check Engineering Services, Santa
Ana, California
Marco Canta, PE Senior Engineer
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Professional Registration
• Engineer in Training,
California, No. 170694
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Irvine, California
Software Skills
• AutoCAD,
• Civil3D,
• SketchUp,
• ArcGIS,
• HEC-HMS,
• Matlab,
• EPAnet,
• MicroStation,
• Microsoft Office
Years With Firm
• 2
Ms. Diep brings 2 years of experience working on various projects within both the public and private sectors, including street improvement, water improvement, sewer improvement, and BMP layouts. She is responsible for tasks including drafting, field reviews, and preparing cost estimates. Ms. Diep has worked with numerous agencies and municipalities throughout Southern California, such as City of Fullerton, City of Anaheim, and Port of Long Beach, and is thoroughly familiar with their agency regulation and design standards. Ms. Diep uses her attention to detail and efficiency when working on various projects to help produce high quality designs.

Artesia Boulevard Arterial Improvements, Newport Beach, California: The City of Gardena wanted to replace existing medians along Artesia Boulevard, from Western Avenue to Vermont Avenue, with a new decorative hardscape paving solution.

Based on prior discussions with City staff, the Cannon Team (including subconsultant BGB Design Group) evaluated and presented four paving solutions to the City. Our team prepared a design study (exhibit) to convey the proposed limits of add or deducted hardscape for City direction. Following approval of the conceptual design direction, Cannon completed revisions to the previously submitted 95% design plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E). Ms. Diep served as Project Engineer.

South Alisal Road, Solvang, California: The City of Solvang (City) wanted to widen South Alisal road and remedy poor drainage in a few locations along the shoulder of the road. Cannon was selected to provide design services such as preparation of construction drawings, specifications, and Opinion of Probable Construction Costs.

Cannon’s revised approach was a full depth reclamation process with cement treated base (rather than lime) that lowered construction costs. Cannon’s design kept the existing 22-foot road as a minimum width and only widened the road in areas narrower than 22-feet. The work included holding existing road centerline alignment, adjusting finished cross slopes to be a consistent 2% throughout, eliminating proposed major slope cuts and grading work, providing additional striping and signage for share the road and pedestrian safety, and replacing an existing 18-inch storm drain culvert undercrossing. Ms.

Diep served as Project Engineer.

San Juan Water Main Replacement and Street
Reconstruction Project, Fullerton, California:

The City of Fullerton (City) required street improvements in the San Juan neighborhood tract. The City selected
Cannon to provide engineering services for the
proposed reconstruction, including pavement
repair and curb ramp upgrades. Cannon also
conducted an alternative analysis of various
asphalt pavement rehabilitation strategies.

We provided field review, base sheets, utility
potholing, replacement / upsizing of existing
water mains, signing and striping improvements,
and survey monumentation. Ms. Diep served as
Project Engineer.

Karena Diep, EIT Design Engineer
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Professional Registration
• Engineer-in-Training,
No. 172883 -
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering,
Brigham Young
University, Provo, UT
Software Skills
• AutoCAD Civil 3D
• Microsoft Office
Years With Firm
• 1
Mr. Fisher has been developing civil engineering experience in the public sector since 2017. His experience includes preparing design plans for water, sewer, and stormwater relocations, replacements, and upgrades, as well as roadway widening and rehabilitation. He is proficient at AutoCAD and is responsible for tasks, including utility coordination; construction observation; plan check services; and providing support with designing, detailing, and preparing plans and construction documents.

He has worked on projects for numerous agencies and municipalities throughout Southern California, including the Cities of Gardena, Manhattan Beach, Fullerton, Whittier, Yorba Linda, and the State of California Military Department, and is thoroughly familiar with Los Angeles County guidelines.

Artesia Boulevard Arterial Improvements, Newport Beach, California: The City of Gardena wanted to replace existing medians along Artesia Boulevard, from Western Avenue to Vermont Avenue, with a new decorative hardscape paving solution. Based on prior discussions with City staff, the Cannon team evaluated and presented four paving solutions to the City. Our team prepared a design study (exhibit) to convey the proposed limits of add or deducted hardscape for City direction. Following approval of the conceptual design direction, Cannon completed revisions to the previously submitted 95% design plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E). Mr. Fisher served as Design Engineer and provided utility coordination and plan preparation.

Pedestrian Improvement Project, Manhattan Beach, California: To enhance pedestrian and driver safety, the City of Manhattan Beach wanted to improve incomplete pedestrian crosswalks. Cannon was selected to provide utility coordination; topographic survey; and preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the ADA curb ramp, sidewalk, roadway pavement, and raised curb island improvements. Mr. Fisher served as Design Engineer and checked project work was compliant with ADA requirements and modified designs if needed to fulfill requirements. He also provided utility coordination and plan preparation.

San Juan Water Main Replacement and Street Reconstruction Project, Fullerton, California: The City of Fullerton (City) required street improvements in the San Juan neighborhood tract to address failed asphalt concrete pavement; broken median curb, curb, and gutter due to tree root heaving; and damaged cross gutters/spandrels. The City
selected Cannon to provide engineering services
for reconstruction, including pavement repair and
curb ramp upgrades. We conducted an alternative
analysis of asphalt pavement rehabilitation
strategies. We also provided field review, base
sheets, utility potholing, replacement / upsizing
of existing water mains, signing and striping
improvements, and survey monumentation. Mr.

Fisher served as Design Engineer and provided
utility coordination and plan preparation.

Zachary Fisher, EIT Project Engineer
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Education
• Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Northern
Arizona University,
Flagstaff, Arizona
• Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering,
Northern Arizona
University, Flagstaff,
Arizona
Professional Affiliations
• American Society of Civil
Engineers
Certifications
• SMR Outfall Field
Screening Monitoring
Years With Firm
• 1
Ms. Marnocha is a Civil Design Engineer within the Public Infrastructure Department at Cannon. She has provided drafting support on projects including but not limited to street improvement, utility coordination, grading, water improvement plans and demolition. Ms. Marnocha has worked with public sectors as an intern and has field work construction management and project administration management experience.

For her Masters, she focused on Project Management and Building Sustainability.

North Pecho Valley Road Upgrade, Avila Beach, California: PG&E required survey services in support of engineering design for improvements to PG&E’s Pecho Valley Road. It was determined that the LiDAR data provided by PG&E was not sufficient for construction level design without considerable effort to supplement the data.

In order to develop construction-level design, Cannon worked with C&C Aerial Mapping to gather aerial data and supplemental topographic field surveys to better understand the project limits. Cannon set 12 targets for ground control in state plane coordinates. Flight used digital camera with IMU and Airborne GPS with CORS Stations. Aerial topography included approximately four linear miles of strip mapping 200-feet wide along the Pecho Valley Road. The task included a seamless color digital orthophoto. Cannon coordinated with PG&E for DCPP security flight clearance prior to the aerial mapping. Ms. Marnocha provided drafting and redline services.

South Lasselle Safety Corridor, Moreno Valley, California: The City of Moreno Valley (City) had received Cycle 8 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) federal funding for safety upgrades on Lasselle Street from the south City limit to College Drive. The purpose of the project was to reduce the incidences of roadway departure and head-on collisions. The project scope was to install high-friction surface treatment at Lasselle Street from Avenida Classica to Camino Quintana and install speed control systems on seven signalized intersections. Cannon provided civil engineering design and survey services, geotechnical recommendations for the design of a high friction surface treatment, traffic signal recommendations, utility coordination, and construction support services. Ms.

Marnocha served as Design Engineer.

New Pressure Reducing Station (PRS) and
Rehabilitation of Ramsdell Mixing Station (RMS),
La Crescenta, California: To avoid water service
shutdowns while completing the necessary
RMS repairs and updates, Crescenta Valley
Water District’s needed to install a new PRS and
isolation valve. Because the upgrades took place
in the City of Glendale’s (City) and County of Los
Angeles (County) right-of-way, Cannon’s scope
included obtaining permits from the City and
County. Cannon also coordinated traffic control
plans as the project site was located adjacent to a
large condominium community and several single-
family residents. Ms. Marnocha provided drafting and
redline services.

Allyson Marnocha Design Engineer
Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Professional Registration
• Professional Land Surveyor,
California, No. 9584
Software Skills
• AutoCAD (Civil3d)
• Leica Cyclone
• MicroSurvey StarNet
Years With Firm
• 1
Mr. Tillmans brings 22 years of extensive field and office experience in boundary/topography, ALTA and right-of-way survey, tract maps and parcel maps, lot line adjustments, records of survey, and corner records. Mr.

Tillmanns also has experience in project management, quality control, post processing of 3d scans, boundary establishment, easement preparation, drafting and construction support. Throughout his career he has served in various roles from drafter, chairman, party chief, project manager, drafting manager, to office survey supervisor.

Pedestrian ADA Improvement Project, Manhattan Beach, California: The City of Manhattan Beach (City) wanted to improve incomplete pedestrian crosswalks that were lacking adequate visibility for motorists. These crosswalks serve as major routes for residents and tourists visiting the Manhattan Beach, Oak Park, Joslyn Center, and other City destination. The proposed improvements included new, rectangular rapid flash beacons (RRFB) and pedestrian signs; striping; raised curb islands; in-road warning lights system; and an ADA compliant curb ramp. Cannon provided topographic survey; utility coordination; and preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for the ADA curb ramp, sidewalk, roadway pavement, and raised curb island improvements. This project enhanced safety at high-flow crossings and increased visibility and awareness for drivers and pedestrians.

Mr. Tillmanns served as Land Surveyor.

Hazard Avenue Resurfacing, Bushard Street to Brookhurst Street, Garden Grove, California: The City of Garden Grove (City) wanted to resurface Hazard Ave. and reconstruct various concrete improvements. As part of our on-call contract with the City, Cannon was selected to provide topographic survey services. The topographic survey included existing street improvements, such as signals, street signs, drainage structures, curbs, fire hydrants, visible utilities, landscaping, striping, etc. withing public right- of-way (ROW). Additionally, the survey included
elevation shots at 100-foot intervals along the
curb flowline, driveways, gutters, and high
points; centerline ROW; and benchmarks. We
provided the survey information collected
in AutoCAD drawing files, drafted in base
topographic form. Mr. Tillmanns served as
Land Surveyor.

Torrance Boulevard Rehabilitation Project,
Torrance, California: The City of Torrance
wanted to construct improvements to

3.4 miles of a major arterial street. Mr.

Tillmanns provided surveying for the
reconstruction and resurfacing, including
storm drain improvements.

Aaron Tillmans, PLS Land Surveyor

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Paul Frislie, PE, IMSA Traffic Control
Professional Registration
• Civil Engineer,
California, No. 72982
Education
• Master of Business
Administration,
University of Phoenix,
Phoenix, AZ
• Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering,
University of California,
Irvine, CA
Registration and
Certifications
• International Municipal
Signal Association
(IMSA)
• FOA Fiber Optic
Technician, No.

CFOT_97189
• Signal Inspector
Level II, No.

AT_97189, 2018
• Signal Inspector
Level I, No. SI97189,
2014
• Traffic Signal Level II,
No. BB97189, 2012
• Traffic Signal Level I,
No. AA97189, 2012
• Work Zone Safety,
No. ZZ97189, 2010
Years With Firm
• 21
Mr. Frislie serves as a Principal Engineer of Iteris’ Consulting Solutions and has been with the firm since 2001. For over 21 years, Mr. Frislie has been involved in numerous transportation and traffic engineering projects that include planning, design, and deployment of ITS, systems integration, and traffic signal design. He served as the Project Manager for the Rosecrans Avenue Arterial Improvement Project, Cypress Phase 1 through 3 ITS Projects, the Newport Beach ITS Phase 5 through 8 Projects, the Santa Monica ATMS Phase 4c project. He has also been the Lead Design Engineer for the development of design plans for the Oxnard ITS Master Plan Design Project, Vermont Avenue Arterial Improvement project, the Santa Monica ATMS 4a/4b Project, SR-710 ITS Design Project, Newport Beach ITS Phase 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 Projects and the Fountain Valley Phase IV project, as well as the Signal Construction Inspector for completion of the Oxnard ITS Master Plan and the Rosecrans and Vermont Arterial Improvements.

Traffic Signal Reconstruction on Vermont at Redondo Beach Boulevard and at Rosecrans Avenue, Gardena, California: Mr. Frislie served as Project Manager, responsible for the traffic analysis, design, and agency coordination of this signal reconstruction project. The project consisted of traffic analysis of the two project intersections: Vermont Ave at Redondo Beach Boulevard and Vermont Avenue and Rosecrans Avenue. The traffic analysis made specific recommendations to both intersections which mainly consisted of traffic signal upgrades, ADA ramp upgrades and pavement repairs. The project also consists of coordination with the City of Los Angeles and United Pacific Railroad. Once construction begins, Iteris will be under contract for construction management and inspection. The project began in 2018 with design concluded in 2019.

Rosecrans Avenue Arterial Improvement Project , Gardena, California: Mr.

Frislie served as Project Manager and Signal Inspector to provide preliminary engineering, design, and construction management of the Rosecrans Avenue Arterial Improvement Project from Vermont Avenue to Crenshaw Boulevard in the City of Gardena. The project is divided into three phases. For the initial preliminary engineering phase, the Iteris Team performed detailed field investigation of the entire corridor to identify deficiencies and recommended improvements to enhance safety and traffic flow along the corridor. Along with recommended median left turn pockets and storage lengths. Topographic survey, geotechnical investigation, traffic signal, signing and striping inventory were conducted as part of the field investigation. Upon City’s approval of the Preliminary Design Report (PDR), the Iteris Team prepared full PS&E package during the design phase, which includes ADA ramps enhancement, raised landscaped medians, pavement rehabilitation, traffic signal improvements, updated signal timing plans and signing and striping modifications for the entire 2 ½ mile corridor. The project began in March 2013 with the PS&E phase completed in August 2014. Iteris also acted as the Construction Manager during construction which completed in March 2016.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Arthur Guy, ASLA, CLIA Landscape Services
Professional Registration
• Registered Landscape
Architect, California,
No. 2214
• Registered Landscape
Architect, Nevada, No.
488
Education
• Bachelor of Science,
Landscape Architecture,
Cal Poly Pomona,
Pomona, California
Special Training
• Certified Landscape
Irrigation Auditor No.
81986
Affiliations
• American Society of
Landscape Architects,
Full Member
• Irrigation Association,
Full Member
Years with Firm
• 20
Arthur Guy has over 40 years of landscape architecture and irrigation design experience; the previous 20 years as Principal with BGB. Among multiple duties, Mr. Guy directs a comprehensive approach to irrigation design the firm and serves as the technical liaison pertaining to water management issues which arise during the planning, design, and implementation phases of projects. Mr. Guy’s knowledge of horticulture extends from high desert to tropical bioregions, enabling him to effectively design planting and irrigation systems appropriate to individual environmental requirements.

Additionally, Mr. Guy provides landscape and irrigation plan check services relating to the City of Rancho Santa Margarita’s Water Conservation Landscape Ordinance.

Recent projects include a one-mile Class I Bike Trail, “Smart Street” improvement project for N. El Camino Real, City of San Clemente, and as an on-call consultant for the City of Newport Beach; median / parkway renovation projects for a one- mile reach of West Pacific Coast Highway and a turf replacement median project along Jamboree Blvd. Currently, BGB is an on-call consultant for the City of Gardena involved in park renovation master planning for the city.

Railroad Corridor Pedestrian Beach Trail, San Clemente, California: BGB was the prime consultant for this $15M multi-phase oceanfront project. The 2.5-mile trail is located at the base of the oceanfront bluffs that run the entire length of the City.

Features included bridges, handicap accessible ramps, beach access facilities, native landscaping, signage, public art and pedestrian accent areas. Mr. Guy was the leader for this large team of consultants during the eight-year planning and design phases of the project. He was also the primary contact person for governmental agencies that were involved in processing (including the City of San Clemente, Caltrans, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, the California Coastal Commission, etc.).

This project received an Award of Excellence by the American Planning Association and a Merit Award from the American Society of Landscape Architects.

University Drive, Irvine, California: As a subconsultant to Harris & Associates, BGB provided preliminary design through construction documents for the one mile reach adjacent to UCI Campus. Landscape and irrigation scope included conversion to reclaimed water. Additionally, photo-simulations were provided to convey interface between the landscape / bike trail and vehicular travel lane. The $1M (landscape scope) Project was completed in early 2021.

Barton Park, Anaheim, California: This 5 acre Park is a joint-use project with the adjacent elementary school to provide an all-weather trail to facilitate the school’s “century walk program”. Existing irrigation was modified in a temporary condition to maintain the central soccer turf during the 6-month construction schedule enabling a shorter delivery to the community. A new irrigation system was designed for efficiency addressing the 25% turf reduction desired by the City. A new restroom building, re-located softball field and Disney donated “Kaboom” play structures were included in the design program. Park was completed in 2019 with a budget of $1.4m.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
History of Lawsuits
Per the RFP’s request, we have provided a list of Cannon’s history of lawsuits within the past five years. Cannon has no past street repair/rehabilitation post-construction claims that required mediation, arbitration, or mitigation (either settled or tried), and has not had any Errors or Omission claims filed against the firm in the past five years associated with road and street design projects.

Project Agency: California State University, Cal Poly State University
Project Award Date: December 17, 2014
Original Contract Value: $752,350
Term of Contract: Project completion expected Summer
2018
Status of Contract: Ongoing Matter
Claims/Litigation/Settlements Associated with the
Contract: Cannon Corporation v. WEBCOR Construction,
LP dba WEBCOR Builders, AAA Case 01-17-0004-2368
Description: Cannon was the civil engineer for a dorm
construction project at Cal Poly State University. This was a design build project with the architect working
for the design builder. Cannon is a subconsultant to the architect. After Cannon timely completed its construction documents it was required by its contract to provide all additional services requested even though most of the
requested services were specifically excluded from its
scope of service under its contract or the responsibility of other subcontractors. The architect refused to
acknowledge Cannon’s claims (approximately $420,000).

Cannon initiated arbitration proceedings under AAA rules in September 2016 and in January, 2018 the arbitrator
ruled that Cannon was the prevailing party and awarded
Cannon substantially all of its fees and legal costs
amounting to $667,000.

Following the award to Cannon, the project continued
and additional out of scope services were requested
of Cannon by WEBCOR, the Prime contractor on the
same project. Cannon submitted its invoices for these
services. WEBCOR presented claims of $1.5 million against Cannon essentially arguing that all Cannon services were included in its scope of work and further alleging errors and omissions suffered by the design builder. Cannon’s
position was that damages suffered by Webor, if any, were a consequence of actions by Webor and the architect.

The matter was resolved with a net six figure payment to Cannon.

Project City/Agency/Other: Rosser International, Inc.

PM Name: Marshall Pihl, SE
Project Award Date: May 14, 2013
Original Contract Value: 4448,372.00
Term of Contract: fixed fee
Status of Contract: Ongoing Matter
Claims/Litigation/Settlements Associated with the
Contract: County of Santa Barbara v Rosser International, Inc. and Does, 1 through 20, CA Superior Court in Santa Barbara County, Case No. 19CV03608
Description: The County of Santa Barbara (County)
contracted with Rosser International, Inc. (Rosser) to serve as the project’s Architect of Record for the design and construction of a jail in Santa Barbara County, commonly known as the Northern Branch Jail Project. At the time
of contracting, Rosser was an architectural firm based
in Atlanta, Georgia. The project was put to bid and S.J.

Amoroso Construction Company (Amoroso) was selected
as the project’s General Contractor. Cannon’s counsel
understands that Amoroso has made a significant claim—
in excess of $3,000,000—against the County, and the
County has, in turn, filed its claim against Rosser and all its subconsultants (Does, 1 through 20) on the Project.

Cannon provided structural engineering services for the project under a contract with Rosser. Throughout the
duration of the project, Rosser was plagued by financial struggles arising from their underperforming projects in the Middle East, which detrimentally impacted Rosser’s
ability to carry out its role as the Project’s Architect of Record. While construction was underway for this
project, Rosser laid off approximately 2/3 of its staff and ultimately declared bankruptcy. This is alleged as a basis for performance failures and resulting liability of Rosser in the County’s Complaint. The Complaint makes just one allegation that appears to be aimed at Cannon: “incorrect top of wall structural connections.”
Analysis of the claim is ongoing. Cannon has not yet
uncovered any basis for liability. Cannon knows of no
errors in its performance and is currently seeking to be dropped from this litigation.

Redondo Beach Blvd. Arterial Improvements CannonCannon
Project City/Agency/Other: Moylan Terrace Repair
PM Name: Marshall Pihl, SE
Project Award Date: March 7, 2017
Original Contract Value: 1,100
Term of Contract: March 2017 – April 2017
Status of Contract: Ongoing Matter
Claims/Litigation/Settlements Associated with the
Contract: Claims for Money Damages
Description: J.W. Design & Construction, Inc. (Builder) was the prime contractor for the Moylan Terrance
condominium housing project in San Luis Obispo. In
December 2020, the Moylan Terrace Homeowners
Association (HOA) presented the Builder with a Notice
of Commencement of Litigation in which it alleged
construction defects at the project. In the notice, HOA makes claims against the Builder, the general contractor and all subcontractors regarding the design and
construction of the project. Cannon was the structural
engineer for the project.

At this early stage there is little known about the
substance of the claims, damages being sought or
whether any claims involve the structural design. The
project was covered by a contractor wrap policy that may cover all claims against the parties named in the suit.

I, Larry Kraemer, PE as a principal of Cannon, have reviewed this list and added appropriate information concerning the status or disposition of the lawsuits or claims.

Larry P . Kraemer, PE No. C 44813 / Director, Public
Infrastructure
Secretary

ReliableReliable
ResponsiveResponsive
SolutionsSolutions
Cannon
11900 West Olympic Blvd., Ste. 530
Los Angeles, California 90064
310.664.1166
2021/22 Fee Schedule
Bill Rate Ranges
Subject to change
Assistant Resident Engineer 135$ - 157$ Project Designer 83$ - 127$ Associate Engineer 140$ - 177$ Project Engineer 120$ - 153$ Associate Landscape Architect 145$ - 156$ Project Manager / Sr. Principal 195$ - 220$ Automation Design/Project Engineer 115$ - 140$ Resident Engineer 155$ - 177$ Automation Specialist 135$ - 153$ Sr. Associate Engineer 150$ - 193$ Automation Technician 95$ - 112$ Sr. Automation Specialist 163$ - 183$ CAD Tech 85$ - 103$ Sr. Automation Technician 126$ - 141$ CAD Manager 100$ - 120$ Sr. CAD Tech 90$ - 110$ Construction Inspector I - III 110$ - 136$ Sr. Construction Manager 180$ - 200$ Construction Manager 155$ - 173$ Sr. Consultant / Principal-in-Charge 176$ - 260$ Design Engineer 110$ - 141$ Sr. Land Surveyor 171$ - 205$ Director 190$ - 225$ Sr. Landscape Architect 153$ - 170$ Engineer Tech 98$ - 108$ Sr. Principal Designer 110$ - 162$ Engineering Assistant I - II 80$ - 105$ Sr. Principal Engineer 180$ - 237$ Engineering Manager 210$ - 230$ Sr. Project Designer 105$ - 139$ Grant Funding Manager I - II 130$ - 157$ Sr. Project Engineer 130$ - 165$ I&E Services Coordinator 80$ - 92$ Sr. Project Manager 190$ - 213$ Information Systems Admin/Manager 75$ - 125$ Sr. Resident Engineer 172$ - 198$ Land Surveyor I - V 150$ - 205$ Structures Representative 172$ - 182$ Landscape Architect 105$ - 119$ Survey Manager / Survey Director 195$ - 235$ Landscape Designer I - II 80$ - 113$ Survey Technician I - VI 110$ - 173$ Lead Automation Specialist 147$ - 162$ Technical Writer I - IV 90$ - 136$ Lead Automation Technician 105$ - 125$
Lead Designer 100$ - 133$ Survey Crew Rates - Regular Office Engineer / Construction I - III 98$ - 130$ One-Man Field 180$ Sr. / Plan Check Engineer I - III 125$ - 177$ Two-Man Field 255$ Planner I - III 83$ - 113$ Three-Man Field 335$ Planning Assistant I 55$ - 70$ Two-Man - HDS 295$ Principal Construction Engineer 185$ - 198$
Principal Designer 110$ - 145$ Survey Crew Rates - Prevailing Wage Principal Engineer 170$ - 217$ One-Man Field 230$ Two-Man Field 305$
Three-Man Field 435$
Electrical - Prevailing Wage
Electrician 110$ - 184$
CM - Prevailing Wage
BCI Construction Inspector 145$
Forensics Engineering / Expert Testimony Fee Schedule Available Upon Request.

Other Direct Charges
Black Line Plots $2.00 per page Color Plots $5.00 per page Outside Reproduction Cost + 15% Travel and Related Subsistence Cost + 15% Automation & Electrical Materials Cost + 25% (+tax) Standard Mileage Rate IRS Rate per mile Subconsultant Fees Cost + 10% Airplane Mileage Rate GSA Rate per mile All of the above hourly rates include all direct labor costs and labor overhead, general and administrative expenses and profit. All direct expenses, such as special equipment, shipping costs, travel other than by automobile, parking expenses, and permit fees will be billed at the actual cost plus 15%. If the client requests, or the client’s schedule requires work to be done on an overtime basis, a multiplier of 1.5 will be applied to the stated rates for weekdays for daily hours in excess of 8 as well as weekends and a multiplier of 2.0 for daily hours in excess of 12 and holidays. If the client requests field services to be provided outside of normal working hours (between 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.), a multiplier of 1.5 will be applied to the stated rates. For prevailing wage projects, if the client requests field services to be provided on any given Sunday, a multiplier of 2.0 will be applied to the stated rates and on or around an observed holiday, other rates may be applied. Survey Crews and Automation Field staff are billed portal to portal, and mileage charges are included in the hourly rate. A minimum charge of 4 hours will be charged for any Automation Field Service calls outside of normal working hours (between 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.). The stated rates are subject to change, typically on an annual basis.

City of Gardena
Redondo Beach Blvd Arterial Improvements Project
(JN 945)
Fee Proposal
Cannon
16842 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92606
949.753.8111
Cannon Sub-Consultant
Iteris
Sub-Consultant
BGB Design
Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Hrs Cost Cost Sub+10% markup Sub+10% markup

1.1 Project Coordination and Meetings 1 $240 28 $6,496 12 $2,532 0 $0 4 $396 $5,379 $3,080 85 $18,123.00

1.2 Records Research and Utility Coordination $0 2 $464 4 $844 24 $3,264 12 $1,188 $770 46 $6,530.00

1.3 Topographic Survey and Base Sheet Preparation 0 $0 1 $232 4 $844 28 $3,808 1 $99 $62,331 $0 $2,970 361 $70,284.00

1.4 Preliminary Engineering Research and Field Investigation 0 $0 4 $928 21 $4,431 28 $3,808 0 $0 $6,250 $24,844 $1,980 210 $42,241.00

1.5 Preliminary Design Report (35% Plans and Cost Estimates) 8 $1,920 12 $2,784 24 $5,064 32 $4,352 2 $198 $9,570 $8,646 192 $32,534.00

1.6 Public Outreach (6 meetings) $0 20 $4,640 20 $4,220 $0 2 $198 $6,831 $6,628 118 $22,517.00

2.1 65% PS&E 24 $5,760 24 $5,568 116 $24,476 192 $26,112 0 $0 $70,532 $12,760 820 $145,208.00

2.2 95% PS&E 16 $3,840 12 $2,784 64 $13,504 96 $13,056 0 $0 $37,785 $10,824 474 $81,793.00

2.3 100% PS&E 8 $1,920 4 $928 24 $5,064 32 $4,352 0 $0 $12,452 $4,290 170 $29,006.00

2.4 Signal Timing $0 $0 $0 $32,395 181 $32,395.00

3.1 Pre-Construction Meeting $0 3 $696 $0 $0 $0 9 $16,003.00

3.2 Review of Submittals $0 2 $464 12 $2,532 8 $1,088 $0 28 $4,084.00

3.3 Response to RFIs $0 2 $464 12 $2,532 8 $1,088 $0 30 $4,084.00

3.4 Field Observation (4 site visits) $0 2 $464 8 $1,688 $0 $0 30 $2,152.00

4.1 As-Built Plans $0 2 $464 4 $844 16 $2,176 $0 $3,619 $2,228 37 $9,331 Total Estimated Hours 57 13,680.00$ 118 27,376.00 $ 325 68,575.00 $ 464 63,104.00 $ 21 2,079.00 $ $68,581 $211,701 $61,189 2,791 $516,285 Reimbursables $4,700
$520,985
Larry Kraemer
$99
Phase 2.0: Final Engineering Design Phase (PS&E)
Task
$232
Project Assistant
Pammela AdenikaKarena Diep
$136
Senior Project Manager Traffic
$7,013
Phase 4.0: Post-Construction Support
Gary Solsona
Principal / QA QC
$8,294
TOTAL =
Phase 3.0: Construction Support
Phase 1.0: Preliminary Engineering
Estimated
Cost
Estimated
Hours
(Cannon &
Subconsult
ants)
LandscapingSurvey
Marco Canta
Senior Engineer
$211$240
Design Engineer
(Principal-In-Charge)
(Principal Engineer)
(Senior Principal Engineer)
(Design Engineer)
(Engineering Assistant)
City of Gardena
Gardena City Council Meeting

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 18.A
Section: COUNCIL ITEMS
Meeting Date: March 8, 2022

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE:

Discussion of current Delegate / Alternate Appointment to the following Outside / City committee:
a. Southern California Association of Governments
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Staff Recommendation: Approve Council Assignment to the Outside / City committee:

Southern California Association of Governments

RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is requesting information regarding the City of Gardena's Delegate and Alternate representatives for the SCAG's 57th Annual Regional Conference & General Assembly. The 2022 SCAG General Assembly will take place on Thursday, May 05, 2022.

Once a year, all delegates and alternates from all
SCAG cities are invited to attend the Annual General Assembly.

Councilmember Mark Henderson is the current City of Gardena Delegate for the SCAG, and Councilmember Art Kaskanian is the current Alternate for the SCAG.

Staff respectfully requests that the City Council discuss the current representatives to the SCAG and confirm the appointments.

FINANCIAL IMPACT/COST:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager