Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Gardena City Council
August 26, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
August 26, 2025
Body
Gardena City Council
Pages
11
Original file
133.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on firebasestorage.googleapis.com. That file is the official record.

GARDENA CITY

COUNCIL
Regular Meeting Notice and Agenda
Council Chamber at City Hall
1700 West 162nd Street, Gardena, California
Webiste: www.cityofgardena.org
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Open Session 7:30 p.m.

TASHA CERDA, Mayor
RODNEY G. TANAKA, Mayor Pro Tem
MARK E. HENDERSON, Council Member
PAULETTE C. FRANCIS, Council Member
WANDA LOVE, Council Member
MINA SEMENZA, City Clerk
GUY H. MATO, City Treasurer
CLINT OSORIO, City Manager
CARMEN VASQUEZ, City Attorney
LISA KRANITZ, Assistant City Attorney
ROSEMARY KOO, Assistant City Attorney
If you would like to participate in this meeting, you can participate via the following options:

1. VIEW THE MEETING live on SPECTRUM CHANNEL 22 or ONLINE at youtube.com/CityofGardena

2. PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING by emailing the Deputy City Clerk at [email protected] by 5:00p.m. On the day of the meeting and write "Public Comment" in the subject line.

3. ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON
PUBLIC COMMENT: The City Council will hear from the public on any item on the agenda or any item of interest that is not on the agenda at the following times:

Agenda Items - At the time the City Council considers the item or during Oral Communications Non-agenda Items - During Oral Communications
Public Hearings - At the time of the Public Hearings listed on the Agenda If you wish to address the Council, please complete a “Speaker Request” form and present it to the City Clerk or Sergeant of Arms. You will be called to the podium by name when it is your turn to address the Council.

The City Council cannot legally take action on any item not scheduled on the Agenda. Such items may be referred for administrative action or scheduled on a future Agenda. Members of the public wishing to address the City Council will be given three (3) minutes to speak.

4. The City of Gardena, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend and/or participate in the City meeting due to disability, to please contact the City Clerk's Office by phone (310) 217-9565 or email [email protected] at least 24 business hours prior to the scheduled general meeting to ensure assistance is provided. Assistive listening devices are available.

STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR THAT PROMOTE CIVILITY AT ALL PUBLIC MEETINGS Treat everyone courteously;
Listen to others respectfully;
Exercise self-control;
Give open-minded consideration to all viewpoints;
Focus on the issues and avoid personalizing debate; and Embrace respectful disagreement and dissent as democratic rights, inherent components of an inclusive public process, and tools for forging sound decisions
Thank you for your attendance and cooperation

1. ROLL CALL

2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION

3. CLOSED SESSION

RETURN FROM CLOSED SESSION ROLL CALL

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Lyneiah Anderson - 153rd Street Elementary

5. INVOCATION
Rev. John Iwohara - Gardena Buddhist Church

6. PRESENTATIONS

6.A. Certificate of Recognition to Stephen Rogers for his service to the community as a Member of the Gardena Economic Business Advisory Commission - To be accepted by Stephen Rogers

6.B. Gardena Events Video Presentation

7. PROCLAMATIONS

7.A. Prostate Cancer Awareness Month - September 2025

8. APPOINTMENTS
Council Appointments to Commissions, Committees, Councils and Boards (Appointees to be Ratified and Sworn In)

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC- Roll Call Vote Required On The Consent Calendar All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion unless a Council Member requests Council discussion, in which case that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered separately following this portion of the agenda.

Waiver of Reading in Full of All Ordinances Listed on this Agenda and that they be Read by Title Only

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CONSENT CALENDAR

9.A. Waiver of Reading in Full of All Ordinances Listed on this Agenda and that they be Read by Title Only
CONTACT: CITY CLERK

9.B. Receive and File Minutes:

Planning and Environmental Quality Commission, June 17, 2025 Planning and Environmental Quality Commission, July 15, 2025 CONTACT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

9.C. Approval of Warrants/Payroll Register, August 26, 2025 CONTACT: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

9.D. Personnel Report P-2025 08-26-2025
CONTACT: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

9.E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1885, Amending Chapter 10.32 Special Speed Zones of the Gardena Municipal Code and Declare California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption.

CONTACT: PUBLIC WORKS

9.F. Approval of Agreement between the City of Lawndale and City of Gardena for the Elderly Nutrition Program Services
CONTACT: RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES

9.G. Approve Amendment to the Agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program CONTACT: TRANSPORTATION

10. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR

11. PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION ACTION SHEET

11.A. August 19, 2025, MEETING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #17-24, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #7-24 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #7-24), to allow the operations of private vehicle storage facilities within two existing industrial buildings (totaling 23,334 square feet), located in the General Industrial (M-2) zone, in accordance with Gardena Municipal Code Section 18.46.030.C.

APPLICANT: Mathew Farah, Westside Collection Car Storage LOCATION: 1608- 1612 W. 139th Street, APN (6102-014-067 and -068) Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 12-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #7-24, and Environmental Assessment #17-24 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption. — City Council Action: Receive and file OR call for review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

11.B. August 19, 2025, MEETING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #7-25, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2-25 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #2-25), per section 18.32.030.B of the Gardena Municipal Code, to allow the onsite-sale and consumption of beer and wine within a new restaurant located in the General Commercial (C-3) zone.

APPLICANT: Vicky's Bubbly Café
LOCATION: 14782 Crenshaw Boulevard, APN (4064-013-021)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 11-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #2-25, and Environmental Assessment #7-25 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption. — City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

11.C. August 19, 2025, MEETING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #2-25, SITE PLAN REVIEW#1-25, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP # 1-25 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for approval of an Environmental Assessment (EA #2-25); Site Plan Review (SPR #1-25); and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1-25; Tentative Parcel Map No. 84583) to allow for the construction a multifamily residential condominium development consisting of three (3) three-story townhome units (1,684 sf living area per unit, exclusive of a 550 sf garage and 100 sf deck) on a 7,405 sf lot in the Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) zone in accordance with Section 18.44.010.A and Chapter 17.08 of the Garden Municipal Code (GMC).

APPLICANT: Mason Zojaji
LOCATION: 15903 Brighton Avenue, APN (6105-014-017)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 10-25, by vote of 3-1-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Site Plan Review #1-25 and Tentative Parcel Map #1-25, And Environmental Assessment #2-25, determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.
— City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (LIMITED TO A 30-MINUTES PERIOD) Oral Communications by the public will be heard for one-half hour during the oral communication segment of the agenda. Any additional speakers will be allowed to speak at the end of the meeting after Council Remarks.

Speakers are limited to three minutes, unless otherwise stated by the Mayor. The timer will be displayed on the screen. Your cooperation is appreciated.

12.A. Public Comment

13. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

14. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

14.A. PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 6698 Adopting a Resolution establishing fees for Vacant Property Program Registration and Renewal, as authorized pursuant to Ordinance No. 1882 and finding that the fee resolution is exempt from CEQA under Guidelines Section 15273 and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8). The adoption of this resolution is statutorily exempt from the requirements of CEQA because these fees are imposed to meet operating expenses through cost recovery for staff wages incurred by the City and the adoption of this resolution falls within the exemptions for local agency decisions specified in Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8) and CEQA Guidelines section 15273.

Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 6698

14.B. Consideration of a contract with spcaLA for Animal Sheltering and Services Staff Recommendation: Approve the contract between the City and spcaLA for a 12 month term beginning September 1, 2025 through August 31, 2026.

15. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - ELECTED & CITY MANAGER'S OFFICES

16. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - POLICE

17. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - PUBLIC WORKS

18. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES

19. DEPARTMENTAL ITEMS - TRANSPORTATION

20. COUNCIL ITEMS

20.A. Approval of the 2025 Gardena Wall of Fame Committee Recommendations for Individual Inductions to the Gardena Wall of Fame
Staff Recommendation: Discuss and Consider Committee Recommendations

20.B. Designation of Voting Delegate / Representative for the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo - October 8-10, 2025
Staff Recommendation: Designate Voting Delegate / Representative

20.C. RESOLUTION NO. 6712, Discuss and Consider Adopting Resolution No. 6712 Redistributing the Community Discretionary Fund of Councilmember Wanda Love to the Rest of the City Council Staff Recommendation: Discuss and Consider Adopting Resolution No. 6712

21. COUNCIL DIRECTIVES

22. CITY MANAGER REMARKS RE: DIRECTIVES / COUNCIL ITEMS

23. COUNCIL REMARKS

1. COUNCIL MEMBER TANAKA

2. COUNCIL MEMBER LOVE

3. COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCIS

4. MAYOR CERDA

5. MAYOR PRO TEM HENDERSON

24. ANNOUNCEMENT(S)

25. REMEMBERANCES
Mrs. Geneva Futrel, 94 years of age, served as the First Lady at South Vermont Avenue Baptist Church in Gardena for 23 years and Berachah Baptist Church in Gardena for another 22 years.

26. ADJOURNMENT
The Gardena City Council will adjourn to the Closed Session portion of the City Council Meeting at 7:00 p.m. followed by the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 9, 2025.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in the City Hall lobby not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. A copy of said Agenda is available on our website at www.CityofGardena.org.
/s/ MINA SEMENZA
MINA SEMENZA, City Clerk
Date Posted: August 22, 2025

1 MINUTES
Regular PEQC Meeting of the
Planning and Environmental Quality Commission
Tuesday, June 17, 2025
The Regular PEQC Meeting Notice and Agenda of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission of the City of Gardena, California, was called to order at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, in the Council Chambers at 1700 W. 162nd Street, Gardena, California.

PARTICIPATE BEFORE THE MEETING by emailing the Planning Commission at [email protected] by 5:00 PM on the day of the meeting and write “Public Comment” in the subject line.

1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 PM.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Stephen P. Langley led the Pledge of Allegiance.

3. ROLL CALL

Present: Chair Ronald Wright-Scherr; Vice-Chair Jules Kanhan; and Commissioner Stephen P. Langley. Employees present: Director of Community Development Greg Tsujiuchi; Assistant City Attorney Rosemary Koo; Planning Assistant Kevin La; and Planning Assistant Dayana Nava.

Commissioners Deryl Henderson and Steve Sherman were away on an excused absence.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – No Items

5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Vice-Chair Wright-Scherr asked if there were any comments from the public. Noted for the record that no member of the public wished to speak to the Planning Commission at this time.

6. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

6.A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #15-24, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #5-24, SITE PLAN REVIEW #3-24, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #1-24
A request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #5-24) to allow warehouse operations in the General Industrial (M-2) zone in accordance with Section 18.46.030.C.18 of the Gardena Municipal Code; Site Plan Review (SPR #3-24) to permit the demolition of an existing 233,634sf single-tenant warehouse building and replace it with four (4) new warehouse buildings, with 15 tenant spaces, totaling 223,509sf, a new parking and circulation plan, lighting, fencing, and landscaping improvements; Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1-24) to permit the merger of eight lot-tied parcels into one single parcel for the site development; and Environmental Assessment (EA #15-24) to consider the proposed project for a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA 2 Guidelines § 15302(b) Class 2, as a replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities.

LOCATION: 1855 W. 139th Street, Gardena, CA 90249 (APN: 4061-025-130) Staff requests that the Commission open and continue the public hearing to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission for July 15, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers.

Director of Community Development Greg Tsujiuchi and Assistant City Attorney Rosemary Koo were present and available to answer any questions.

Planning Assistant Kevin La informed the Commissioners about staff's recommendation to continue to July 15, 2025.

MOTION: A motion was made by Commissioner Langley and seconded by Chair Wright-Scherr to Continue the Public Hearing to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission on July 15, 2025:

The motion was passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Langley, Wright-Scherr and Kanhan
Noes: None

Absent: Henderson and Sherman

7. OTHER ITEMS

7.A RECEIVE BROWN ACT TRAINING FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE The Commission received a training presentation from Assistant City Attorney Rosemary Koo on the Brown Act and Conflicts of Interest.

8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Community Development Director, Greg Tsujiuchi announced upcoming city events. 1) 4th of July Celebration, Friday, July 4, 2025, from 5:00 PM – 10:00 PM at Rowley Park. 2) Gardena’s Show & Shine Car Show & Concert, Saturday, July 12, 2025, from 10:00 AM – 2:00 PM at Rowley Park.
3) Summer Block Party and Back to School Backpack Giveaway, Tuesday, August 5, 2025, from 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM on the City Hall Complex.

9. PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS 1) COMMISSIONER LANGLEY – He expressed gratitude to Assistant City Attorney Rosemary Koo and the other city attorneys for their assistance. He also shared that his granddaughter graduated from UC Davis.
2) COMMISSIONER KANHAN – He mentioned that he attended the Retirement Ceremony for Chief Mike Saffell.

1 MINUTES
Regular PEQC Meeting of the
Planning and Environmental Quality Commission
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
The Regular PEQC Meeting Notice and Agenda of the Planning and Environmental Quality Commission of the City of Gardena, California, was called to order at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, July 15, 2025, in the Council Chambers at 1700 W. 162nd Street, Gardena, California.

1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:03 PM.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Ronald Wright-Scherr led the Pledge of Allegiance.

3. ROLL CALL

Present: Chair Ronald Wright-Scherr; Vice-Chair Jules Kanhan; Commissioner Steve Sherman and Commissioner Deryl Henderson. Employees present: Director of Community Development Greg Tsujiuchi; Assistant City Attorney Rosemary Koo and Planning Assistant Kevin La.

Commissioner Stephen P. Langley was away on an excused absence.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

4.A May 6, 2025
MOTION: A motion was made by Vice-Chair Kanhan and seconded by Commissioner Henderson to approve the minutes of the meeting held on May 6, 2025, with a revision to the signature line to accurately reflect the name of Ronald Wight-Scherr as Chair:

The motion was passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Kanhan, Henderson, Sherman and Wright-Scherr
Noes: None

Absent: Langley

5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Vice-Chair Wright-Scherr asked if there were any comments from the public. Administrative Analyst I, Georgina Placido, noted for the record that no member of the public wished to speak to the Planning Commission at this time.
2 6. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

6.A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #15-24, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #5-24, SITE PLAN REVIEW #3-24, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #1-24
The Applicant requests the following entitlements for the redevelopment of an approximately 11.10 acres of land:
• Conditional Use Permit (CUP #5-24): to permit the operations of warehousing in the General Industrial (M- 2) zone in accordance with section 18.46.030.C.18 of the Gardena Municipal Code;
• Site Plan Review (SPR #3-24): to approve the redevelopment of an existing 233,634 square foot (sf) single-tenant warehouse building to totaling 223,509 sf, a new parking and circulation plan, lighting, fencing, and landscaping improvements;
• Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1-24 or Tentative Parcel Map No. 84649): to merge eight (8) lot-tied parcels into one (1) parcel for the site development; and
• Categorical Exemption (EA #15-24): The proposed project is being considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15302(b) Class 2, as a replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.

APPLICANT: Terreno 139th LLC (Representative: Hayes Graham) LOCATION: 1855 W. 139th Street, Gardena, CA 90249 (APN: 4061-025-130) Director of Community Development Greg Tsujiuchi and Assistant City Attorney Rosemary Koo were present and available to answer any questions.

Planning Assistant Kevin La presented the Staff Report for the following entitlements for the redevelopment of an approximately 11.10 acres of land: Conditional Use Permit (CUP #5-24); Site Plan Review (SPR #3-24); Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1- 24 or Tentative Parcel Map No. 84649); and Categorical Exemption (EA #15-24).

Mr. La informed everyone that the Commission opened the public hearing on June 17, 2025, and continued the item to July 15, 2025, for further public hearing and discussion.

Mr. La displayed the Vicinity Map and the Zoning Map for the project site located at 1855 West 139th Street. He also showed photos of the existing building and the current site plan.
3 Mr. La presented the proposed site plan, which includes four buildings: Building A1, Building A2, Building B&C, and Building D. He noted that there will be a 10-foot separation between Buildings A1 and A2. Additionally, Buildings B and C will be connected by a common wall, and there will be six trash enclosures on the site.

Mr. La identified five project access locations on the project site, along with the relocation of two existing driveways and the addition of a new driveway on South Western Avenue. He noted that access from Western Avenue is for non-commercial vehicles only.

Mr. La then displayed the exterior renderings of the proposed project, showcasing views of Buildings A and B, as well as the proposed fence, decorative block wall, and landscaping in the front. He also presented views of Buildings C and D.

Additionally, Mr. La displayed the project floor plan for Unit C, which includes the office location and entrance. He noted that there is a condition that prohibits cold or refrigerated storage of goods, as well as any uses, deliveries, or tenant improvements that would involve using tenant space for cold or refrigerated storage.

Mr. La gave the development standards requirements for a proposed building in the M-2 Zone; maximum floor area ratio; maximum building height; minimum setbacks; minimum landscaping and maximum of walls/fencing.

Mr. La outlined the development standards required for a proposed building in the M-2 Zone, that included the maximum floor area ratio, maximum building height, minimum setbacks, minimum landscaping requirements, and the maximum allowance for walls and fencing. He noted that the project meets and exceeds all the minimum development standards of the M-2 Zone. As a result, the proposed structures are consistent with the applicable development standards.

Mr. La provided a detailed overview of the minimum parking and alternative minimum parking requirements, the existing parcel map, and the proposed parcel map.

Mr. La explained that the City retained the consulting firm of Kimley-Horn and Associates to prepare the CEQA Compliance Technical Memorandum and conduct a peer review of the traffic study submitted by the applicant. The City’s consultant concluded that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA section 15302(b) under Class 2. Their analysis determined that there are no new significant impacts or unusual circumstances associated with the project.

Mr. La noted that public hearing notices were duly advertised in the Gardena Valley News and mailed to owners and occupants within 300’ of the project site on June 5, 2025. Additionally, notices were sent to individuals and entities that have requested notifications regarding CEQA projects. As of now, no public comments regarding the project have been received.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
• Conduct the public hearing;
• Receive testimony from the public; and
• Adopt Resolution No. PC 9-25, approving EA #15-24, CUP #5-24, SPR #3- 24, and TPM #1-24 subject to the Conditions of Approval, • Direct Staff to file a Notice of Exemption.
4 Chair Wright-Scherr announced that the Public Hearing was open and asked how many public speakers wished to speak on this item. City staff informed him that there were three public speakers, one of whom was the applicant.

Commissioner Henderson sought clarification that the proposed project will not be utilized for cold storage. Mr. La confirmed that the project is conditioned to prohibit any form of cold storage on the site.

Hayes Graham, a representative of Terreno Realty Corp., introduced himself and shared some background information about the real estate company and the proposed project. He mentioned that the company has been the owner and operator of real estate in the greater Los Angeles area for approximately 20 years and has owned the project site for about 10 years.

Chair Wright-Scherr inquired about the expected duration of the project. Mr. Graham responded that they anticipate approximately 12 months for construction, followed by six to eight months for leasing.

Chair Wright-Scherr then asked if any of the Commissioners had questions.

Commissioner Henderson asked for the square footage per unit or building. Mr.

Graham replied that there would be 12 units, with sizes ranging from 10,000 to 12,000 square feet. Mr. La confirmed that there would actually be 15 units.

Commissioner Henderson referenced the overview map, noting that there are two proposed roll-up doors for each unit. He asked whether the facility layout is large enough to accommodate full 18-wheelers or if they are only considering bobtail trucks, as he wanted to understand the spacing. Mr. Graham responded that careful consideration was given to ensure the facility is functional for all potential users. It can accommodate a full 53-foot 18-wheeler; however, it is primarily designed for smaller trucks and complies with the Fire Department's regulations. The design includes ample turning radius and green space. Mr. La added that each loading dock space measures approximately 10 feet in width by 60 feet in length and is open to the sky. Additionally, the loading docks have a backup clearance of about 50 feet.

Vice-Chair Kanhan asked whether the current tenant will be relocated or remain onsite. Mr. Graham responded that the tenant will be moving and is looking to purchase something in the Inland Empire.

Chair Wright-Scherr inquired whether they had any potential tenants in mind for leasing. Mr. Graham responded that they would wait until the construction is closer to completion. However, he mentioned that they would begin marketing the project early. Currently, they do not have any specific tenants lined up.

Chair Wright-Scherr inquired whether they plan to include tenants that handle health hazard materials. Mr. Graham confirmed that they do not plan to have that as part of their use base. Mr. La added that there will be limited manufacturing, which will comply with the permitted uses of the zone, as well as a warehouse under the conditional use permit. He also assured that there should be no health hazards associated with the manufacturing of goods.
5 Public Speakers:
1) Salvador George and 2) Steve Gancherov of Local 323 Carpenters Union expressed their appreciation and spoke in support of the project. 3) Carlos Rivera, 4) Leonardo Patino, 5) Jose Garcia of LiUNA Local 1309, all spoke in support of the developer and proposed project.

Commissioner Henderson inquired about the traffic study and asked whether there would be any traffic issues on Western Avenue. Director of Community Development Greg Tsujiuchi responded that the proposed project is for a warehouse distribution facility, the same type of use as the existing one, but it is actually 10,000 square feet smaller. Therefore, there will be no traffic impact. Mr. James Thomas, of Kimley Horn confirmed that the traffic study conducted considered both the existing use and the number of trips generated for day-to-day operations. In collaboration with the developer, they also assessed the anticipated trips for future use. Mr. Thomas noted that Kimley Horn did not prepare the traffic study, as they are contracted with the city. However, they did peer-review the study prepared by the applicant’s traffic consultant and agreed with its findings. Mr. Thomas concurred with Mr. Tsujiuchi that the project is forecasted to reduce traffic by approximately 33 trips per day. This reduction is due to the decrease of about 10,000 square feet, which theoretically will result in a slight improvement in traffic in that area.

Chair Wright-Scherr announced that the Public Hearing was closed.

MOTION: A motion was made by Vice-Chair Kanhan and seconded by Chair Wright-Scherr to Conduct the public hearing; Receive testimony from the public; and Adopt Resolution No. PC 9-25, approving EA #15-24, CUP #5-24, SPR #3-24, and TPM #1-24 subject to the Conditions of Approval, and Direct Staff to file a Notice of Exemption:

The motion was passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Kanhan, Wright-Scherr, Henderson and Sherman
Noes: None

Absent: Langley

7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Community Development Director Greg Tsujiuchi provided a verbal report to follow up on inquiries made by a member of the Commission regarding the chapel or church that is being replaced by improvements by the Environmental Charter High School on Crenshaw and Manhattan Beach Boulevard. He informed the Commission that discussions have occurred, and there is a plan to ensure that the developer finds a way to commemorate the chapel, which had stood for decades. However, the entire project is currently on hold due to financial issues. Mr. Tsujiuchi noted that staff have not yet brought the item back for approval, but he wanted to inform them that the project is on hiatus for the time being.

Once the developer is ready to proceed, the project will be presented to the Commission again.

Community Development Director, Greg Tsujiuchi announced upcoming city events. 1) Summer Block Party and Back to School Backpack Giveaway, Tuesday, August 5, 2025, from 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM on the City Hall Complex.

MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Treasurer’s Office
DATE: August 21, 2025
SUBJECT: WARRANT REGISTER

PAYROLL REGISTER

August 26, 2025 TOTAL WARRANTS ISSUED: $2,971,033.60

Wire Transfer: 13030, 13052-13056
Prepay: 181754-181759
Check Numbers: 181760-181907
Checks Voided: 181754

Total Pages of Register: 20

August 22, 2025 TOTAL PAYROLL ISSUED: $2,637,209.73

__________________________________
for Guy Mato, City Treasurer

08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
1 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 13030 7/1/2025 112401 PINNACLE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC JULY 2025 HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE, SERVICE FEE 111,434.17 023-01625
Total : 111,434.17
13052 7/21/2025 112326 LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS INC. 071925 WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS 100,000.00 Total : 100,000.00
13053 7/30/2025 111016 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN AUGUST 2025 HEALTH INSURANCE 381,557.55 Total : 381,557.55
13054 7/30/2025 103768 U.S. TREASURY FORM 720-2025 QUARTERLY FEDERAL EXCISE TAX RETURN 1,429.68 Total : 1,429.68
13055 8/5/2025 112401 PINNACLE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC 080425 HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS 16,875.94 Total : 16,875.94
13056 8/5/2025 303348 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENTAPR-JUN 2025 SUI QUARTER ENDED 06/30/25 6,993.00 Total : 6,993.00
181754 8/13/2025 113527 TUSTIN BUICK GMC DOWN PAYMENT 020-00062 2025 GMC SIERRA 1500 DOWN PAYMENT 15,000.00 Total : 15,000.00
181755 8/12/2025 110273 MIXONE SOUND 3711 034-00716 JAZZ FESTIVAL 2025 - VIDEO DISPLAY BOARD 9,000.00 Total : 9,000.00
181756 8/12/2025 110273 MIXONE SOUND 3711BAL 034-00716 JAZZ FESTIVAL 2025 - VIDEO DISPLAY BOARD 9,000.00 Total : 9,000.00
181757 8/13/2025 111778 SPCALA 202507 032-00224 ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES 20,700.00 Total : 20,700.00
181758 8/13/2025 113527 TUSTIN BUICK GMC SI12927 DOWN PAYMENT 020-00062 2025 GMC SIERRA VIN #1GT10MED8SU413030 D 15,000.00 Total : 15,000.00
181759 8/13/2025 113527 TUSTIN BUICK GMC SI12927 020-00062 2025 GMC SIERRA VIN #1GT10MED8SU413030 74,896.40 Total : 74,896.40
Page: 1
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
2 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181760 8/26/2025 104606 2 BROTHERS TIRES & WHEELS 31252 PD VEHICLE TIRE SERVICES 22.00 31262 PD VEHICLE TIRE SERVICES 20.00
31289 PD VEHICLE TIRE SERVICES 20.00
31292 PD VEHICLE TIRE SERVICES 108.00
31336 PD VEHICLE TIRE SERVICES 44.00
Total : 214.00
181761 8/26/2025 106086 ABC COMPANIES 3876729 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 305.71 Total : 305.71
181762 8/26/2025 111853 ACCESS 11674013 PD SHREDDING SERVICES 251.95 11726344 PD SHREDDING SERVICES 254.35
Total : 506.30
181763 8/26/2025 101748 AFTERMARKET PARTS COMPANY LLC, THE 83868216 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 121.33 83869538 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 36.08
83877010 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 330.67
83897878 037-10469 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 504.01
Total : 992.09
181764 8/26/2025 113538 AGUIRRE, ESTEFANIA CIT #455125696 PARKING CITATION REFUND 70.00 Total : 70.00
181765 8/26/2025 108625 ARAD OIL INC. JUNE 2025 PD CAR WASH 144.00 MAY 2025 PD CAR WASH 216.00
Total : 360.00
181766 8/26/2025 105293 ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC 12870456 REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES - CIVIC CENTER 64.86 Total : 64.86
181767 8/26/2025 101459 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I500-01248908 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 8.00 Total : 8.00
181768 8/26/2025 104687 AT&T 23775802 TELEPHONE 35,088.06 23778609 TELEPHONE 217.01
23868203 TELEPHONE 855.44
Total : 36,160.51
Page: 2
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
3 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181769 8/26/2025 111170 AT&T FIRSTNET 287290885074X081025 023-01618 CITYWIDE CELL PHONE ACCT #287290885074 3,425.83 287293420631X081025 023-01618 CD CELL PHONE ACCT #287293420631 311.23 287298156560X081025 023-01618 CITYWIDE CELL PHONE ACCT #287298156560 1,908.87 287303490376X081025 023-01618 BUS CELL PHONE ACCT #287303490376 1,882.08 287324972943X081025 023-01618 GTRANS CELL PHONE ACCT #287324972943 272.48 287324972943X7102025 023-01618 GTRANS CELL PHONE ACCT #287324972943 272.48 287352273971X081025 023-01618 PW CELL PHONE ACCT #287352273971 273.46 Total : 8,346.43
181770 8/26/2025 100474 AT&T LONG DISTANCE 576662 LEA TRACKING 475.00 Total : 475.00
181771 8/26/2025 100964 AT&T MOBILITY 828667974X08162025 CM CELL PHONE ACCT #828667974 86.46 Total : 86.46
181772 8/26/2025 112942 AWP SAFETY 40018682 SIGNS - 16"X18" BUS STOP 1,223.90 Total : 1,223.90
181773 8/26/2025 102035 BD WHITE TOP SOIL CO., INC. 92844 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 40.89 Total : 40.89
181774 8/26/2025 103641 BECNEL UNIFORMS 80580 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLES 626.67 82534 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLES 601.65
82535 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLES 370.96
82664 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLES 462.93
83354 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLES 37.59
83356 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLES 41.98
83373 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLIES 381.98
83521 BUS UNIFORM SUPPLIES 37.59
Total : 2,561.35
181775 8/26/2025 113533 BRADLEY, WILHELMINA RECEIPT #86416938 MAINTENANCE DEPOSIT REFUND 100.00 Total : 100.00
181776 8/26/2025 113529 BRIEFING ROOM LLC, THE 1350 ONLINE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 3,185.62 Total : 3,185.62
181777 8/26/2025 113234 C2R PRODUCTIONS LLC 2015969 020-00061 VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES - APRIL 2025 2,000.00 Page: 3
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
4 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181777 8/26/2025 113234 C2R PRODUCTIONS LLC (Continued) 2015970 020-00061 VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES - MAY 2025 2,000.00 2015971 020-00061 VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES - JUNE 2025 2,000.00 Total : 6,000.00
181778 8/26/2025 103029 CALIFORNIA FENCE & SUPPLY M16914 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 33.24 Total : 33.24
181779 8/26/2025 110313 CALTIP 94-2025-JULY 037-10449 INSURANCE CLAIMS DEDUCTIBLE - JULY 2025 2,164.32 Total : 2,164.32
181780 8/26/2025 823003 CARL WARREN & COMPANY FEBRUARY 2025 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT 3,644.33 JULY 2025 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT 4,186.73
JUNE 2025 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT 7,276.17
Total : 15,107.23
181781 8/26/2025 803420 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT, LAW OFFICES OF 49909 LEGAL SERVICES 1,570.00 49911 LEGAL SERVICES 253.00
49984 LEGAL SERVICES 701.50
50092 LEGAL SERVICES 2,476.89
50094 LEGAL SERVICES 184.00
50096 LEGAL SERVICES 1,658.90
50125 LEGAL SERVICES 665.50
50127 LEGAL SERVICES 116.00
50129 LEGAL SERVICES 1,401.00
50162 LEGAL SERVICES 585.34
50167 LEGAL SERVICES 1,632.50
50169 LEGAL SERVICES 788.70
50171 LEGAL SERVICES 184.00
50172 LEGAL SERVICES 598.00
50186 LEGAL SERVICES 253.00
50187 LEGAL SERVICES 203.53
50189 LEGAL SERVICES 437.00
50194 LEGAL SERVICES 598.00
50196 LEGAL SERVICES 1,127.00
50197 LEGAL SERVICES 1,380.00
50198 LEGAL SERVICES 3,464.00
Page: 4
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
5 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181781 8/26/2025 803420 803420 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT, LAW OFFICES OF (Continued) Total : 20,277.86 181782 8/26/2025 105122 CERDA, TASHA 07/10-07/12 2025 ICA SEMINAR - PER DIEM 318.00 Total : 318.00
181783 8/26/2025 103489 CF UNITED LLC 060125-063025 PD CAR WASH 583.00 Total : 583.00
181784 8/26/2025 110200 CHARITABLE FUND BENEFITTING, GARDENA CERDA 24/25, COMMUNITY PROMOTION 282.00 Total : 282.00
181785 8/26/2025 108378 CHARLES E. THOMAS COMPANY INC. 117678 037-10367 MONITORING SYSTEM CERTIFICATION 2,182.95 Total : 2,182.95
181786 8/26/2025 104126 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 187854501070725 023-01619 CABLE & BACKUP INTERNET SERVICES 4,336.98 187854501080725 023-01619 CABLE & BACKUP INTERNET SERVICES 5,931.18 Total : 10,268.16
181787 8/26/2025 308112 CITY OF HAWTHORNE PSI-25-08 035-01360 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FOR TIBURON/MARK 43 95,199.21 Total : 95,199.21
181788 8/26/2025 110985 CIVICPLUS, LLC 345475 023-01616 WEBSITE MANAGEMENT AND ADA SOFTWARE 5,880.00 Total : 5,880.00
181789 8/26/2025 110122 COMMANDSTAT ANALYTICS, INC 248 DATABASE MGMT & REPORTING PREPARATION 2,016.00 Total : 2,016.00
181790 8/26/2025 103465 COMMUNITY VETERINARY HOSPITAL 719326714 VETERINARY SERVICES - MAXO 1,554.75 Total : 1,554.75
181791 8/26/2025 102388 COPYLAND, INC. 90646 037-10457 GTRANS - 11"X26" COLOR BUS CARDS 487.03 90671 037-10457 GTRANS - 72"X36" BANNERS 328.21
90837 037-10457 GTRANS - 8.5"X14" "DAILY VEHICLE INSPECT 1,266.92 90845 037-10457 GTRANS - 8.5"X11" COLOR TRIFOLDS 1,549.59 90876 037-10457 GTRANS - 24"X36" COROPLAST SIGNS 94.37
90953 037-10457 GTRANS - BUSINESS CARD PRINT 726.98
Total : 4,453.10
Page: 5
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
6 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181792 8/26/2025 102791 CPAC, INC. 1301681 023-01615 VEEAM SUB UPFRONT BILLING MLIC OFFICE 36 5,985.00 Total : 5,985.00
181793 8/26/2025 103512 CRENSHAW LUMBER CO. 14298 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 222.19 Total : 222.19
181794 8/26/2025 106193 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 07-250725342 FLEET COUNT 105.00 Total : 105.00
181795 8/26/2025 104736 D&R OFFICE WORKS, INC. 136789 FINANCE OFFICE FURNITURE 3,993.13 Total : 3,993.13
181796 8/26/2025 102228 DAILY BREEZE 0011742735 LEGAL NOTICE - INVITATION FOR BID 280.61 Total : 280.61
181797 8/26/2025 113535 DODD, PRISCILLA ANN RECEIPT #84254010 MAINTENANCE DEPOSIT REFUND 100.00 Total : 100.00
181798 8/26/2025 109416 E S SPORTS 12261 CUSTOM GRAPHICS FOR UNIT P05 1,144.58 12268 CUSTOM GRAPHICS FOR UNIT P15 858.31
12269 CUSTOM GRAPHICS FOR UNIT P14 796.13
12270 CUSTOM GRAPHICS FOR UNIT P16 355.13
Total : 3,154.15
181799 8/26/2025 110534 EL DORADO NATIONAL 90880680 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 4,298.71 90881603 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 3,575.56
90881623 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 86.28
90881678 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 1,299.57
90881720 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 1,421.50
90881822 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 271.48
90881838 GTRANS BUS VEHICLE SUPPLIES 1,067.77
Total : 12,020.87
181800 8/26/2025 107353 EMERGENCY RESPONSE CRIME SCENE, CLEANING T2025-264 CLEAN AND SANITIZE JAIL CELL 850.00 T2025-295 CLEAN AND SANITIZE JAIL CELL 1,500.00
T2025-321 CLEAN AND SANITIZE JAIL CELL 850.00
Total : 3,200.00
Page: 6
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
7 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181801 8/26/2025 105418 EMPIRE CLEANING SUPPLY S7163927 034-00713 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 696.20 S7184419 034-00713 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 1,383.91
S7222926 034-00713 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 2,612.13
Total : 4,692.24
181802 8/26/2025 105392 ENTENMANN-ROVIN COMPANY 0189751 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 986.52 Total : 986.52
181803 8/26/2025 106459 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST FBN5375313 023-01620 ENTERPRISE LEASE - JULY 2025 10,922.19 023-01572
FBN5375463 023-01620 ENTERPRISE LEASE - JULY 2025 - PD 14,267.26 FBN5399362 023-01620 ENTERPRISE LEASE - AUGUST 2025 10,895.25 023-01572
FBN5400038 023-01620 ENTERPRISE LEASE - AUGUST 2025 - PD 14,703.05 Total : 50,787.75
181804 8/26/2025 105650 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 26880805 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 448.62 26918775 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 75.56
26937359 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 383.17
27132110 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 190.05
Total : 1,097.40
181805 8/26/2025 106109 FASTSIGNS 0094-119591 PD WINDOW GRAPHICS 588.41 Total : 588.41
181806 8/26/2025 106129 FEDEX 9-700-85062 SHIPPING SERVICES 6.73 Total : 6.73
181807 8/26/2025 103083 FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS OCC HEALTH, SOLUTIONS 2503082507 DRUG TEST/ADMIN FEE 475.82 Total : 475.82
181808 8/26/2025 106545 FLEETPRIDE, INC 127733710 SEWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1,054.96 Total : 1,054.96
181809 8/26/2025 112329 FM THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING INC 48353 024-01103 HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINT SERVICES 19,573.17 Total : 19,573.17
181810 8/26/2025 106465 FOX FIRST AID & SAFETY INC 75732 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 477.36 Page: 7
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
8 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181810 8/26/2025 106465 FOX FIRST AID & SAFETY INC (Continued) 75832 STREET MAINT SUPPLIES 119.34
Total : 596.70
181811 8/26/2025 112566 GALLS, LLC 026630235 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 925.36 026986028 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 1,544.59
027201813 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES -619.23
027812143 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 99.23
029217549 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 76.06
029217562 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 74.97
029592718 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 925.36
030277516 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 109.73
030277517 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 69.04
030498523 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 38.31
030679181 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES -149.94
030878028 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 308.70
030909416 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 342.13
031012652 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 234.24
032000191 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 1,011.26
032000453 PD UNIFORM SUPPLIES 1,011.26
Total : 6,001.07
181812 8/26/2025 111790 GARDENA VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE, LIBRARYFRANCIS 25/26 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 100.00 Total : 100.00
181813 8/26/2025 107011 GARDENA VALLEY NEWS 300244221 BACK PAGE AD - GTRANS G LINE 821.50 300244787 BACK PAGE AD - GTRANS G LINE 821.50
Total : 1,643.00
181814 8/26/2025 107034 GARDENA WELDING SUPPLY CO INC. 95 132065 PW MAINT SUPPLIES 454.71 95 132069 PW MAINT SUPPLIES 147.48
Total : 602.19
181815 8/26/2025 106470 GILLIG LLC 41332071 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 492.84 41334102 037-10471 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 308.30
41334990 037-10120 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 751,400.00
41337708 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 154.16
Page: 8
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
9 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181815 8/26/2025 106470 GILLIG LLC (Continued)
41337911 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 1,494.88
Total : 753,850.18
181816 8/26/2025 619004 GOLDEN STATE WATER CO. 080525 WATER 14,931.11 Total : 14,931.11
181817 8/26/2025 102486 GOODPASTER, PATRICK GEPCO 2025 GEPCO LOAN 2,000.00 Total : 2,000.00
181818 8/26/2025 107513 GRAINGER 9581973840 GTRANS MAINT SUPPLIES 173.28 9589700658 037-10459 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES 569.77
9593414247 GTRANS MAINT SUPPLIES 409.14
9593414254 037-10459 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES 550.56
9593414296 GTRANS MAINT SUPPLIES -62.60
9593414304 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES -80.66
9593414312 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES -539.77
9593414320 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES -224.21
9595504490 037-10459 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES 1,020.41
9596708819 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES 510.19
9598803675 GTRANS MAINT SUPPLIES 543.96
Total : 2,870.07
181819 8/26/2025 108434 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1544826 PD PROGRAM SUPPLIES 41.62 3530530 EQUIP MAINT SUPPLIES 124.97
4332570 BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES 155.44
4526308 JAIL PROGRAM SUPPLIES 274.42
6344388 BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES 63.22
9364349 BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES 50.44
9535069 PD PROGRAM SUPPLIES 106.68
Total : 816.79
181820 8/26/2025 110222 INTERAMERICAN MOTOR, LLC 101-482531 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 84.89 110-864616 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 235.97
Total : 320.86
181821 8/26/2025 104659 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT, LLC KPPD363 OFF-SITE STORAGE SERVICES - JULY 2025 65.50 Page: 9
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
10 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181821 8/26/2025 104659 104659 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT, LLC (Continued) Total : 65.50 181822 8/26/2025 103064 ITERIS, INC. 182714 024-00677 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT - VERMONT AVE & 1 240.88 Total : 240.88
181823 8/26/2025 110733 J & S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND, MAINTENANCE, INC 9353 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICE - JULY 2,089.65 Total : 2,089.65
181824 8/26/2025 100436 J.J. KELLER & ASSOCIATES, INC 9110416419 037-10460 FLEET MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE 538.67 Total : 538.67
181825 8/26/2025 211429 KEMP, TAMARA JULY 2025 DANCE INSTRUCTOR 1,402.50 Total : 1,402.50
181826 8/26/2025 112812 KIMBALL MIDWEST 103555611 GTRANS SHOP SUPPLIES 108.29 103563358 GTRANS SHOP SUPPLIES 61.88
103577275 GTRANS SHOP SUPPLIES 524.99
103630000 GTRANS SHOP SUPPLIES 127.63
Total : 822.79
181827 8/26/2025 312240 L.A. COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF, PUBLIC WORKS25081200350 INDUSTRIAL WASTE SERVICES 14,212.36 25081200688 024-01101 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT - JUNE 2025 9,746.67 Total : 23,959.03
181828 8/26/2025 112614 LAX AUTO REPAIR 20602 2015 TOYOTA SIENNA #577636 OIL & FILTER 70.00 20609 2015 TOYOTA CAMRY #561267 OIL & FILTER 70.00
20610 2024 DODGE DURANGO #1697550 OIL & 70.00
20613 2023 FORD EXPLR #46945 OIL & FILTER 70.00
20617 2011 CHEVY TAHOE #1376558 OIL & FILTER 70.00
Total : 350.00
181829 8/26/2025 113442 LCR EARTHWORK & ENGINEERING, CORP. 01 024-01153 LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS, JN 525/544 212,350.18 Total : 212,350.18
181830 8/26/2025 108237 LEO WEB PROTECT 81059883698 020-00063 INTERNET PRIVACY SERVICE SUBSCRIPTION 5,999.94 Total : 5,999.94
181831 8/26/2025 112260 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 300265 LEGAL SERVICES 3,078.00 Page: 10
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
11 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181831 8/26/2025 112260 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE (Continued) 300267 LEGAL SERVICES 1,336.50
300271 LEGAL SERVICES 20,227.00
300272 LEGAL SERVICES 3,073.40
Total : 27,714.90
181832 8/26/2025 112260 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 291284 LEGAL SERVICES 252.00 291289 LEGAL SERVICES 2,241.00
291290 LEGAL SERVICES 2,394.00
300261 LEGAL SERVICES 829.50
300262 LEGAL SERVICES 14,076.00
300263 LEGAL SERVICES 5,850.00
300264 LEGAL SERVICES 3,627.75
300268 LEGAL SERVICES 450.00
300269 LEGAL SERVICES 1,121.00
300270 LEGAL SERVICES 56.00
300273 LEGAL SERVICES 4,014.00
Total : 34,911.25
181833 8/26/2025 112260 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 300266 LEGAL SERVICES 11,885.61 Total : 11,885.61
181834 8/26/2025 109517 LOAD N' GO BUILDING MATERIALS 33884 STREET MAINT SUPPLIES 8.56 Total : 8.56
181835 8/26/2025 107991 LRJ CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2059CDBG-1 032-00225 CDBG HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM - 2059 W 146T 21,852.00 Total : 21,852.00
181836 8/26/2025 109563 LUCKY LADY CASINO 0850000281 ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE - JULY 2025 31,018.80 Total : 31,018.80
181837 8/26/2025 112326 LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS INC. 23619 023-01623 WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 21,925.25 Total : 21,925.25
181838 8/26/2025 112326 LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS INC. 25773 023-01623 WORKERS' COMP CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 21,925.25 Total : 21,925.25
181839 8/26/2025 113064 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 49813270 GTRANS FACILITIES SUPPLIES 282.44 Page: 11
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
12 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181839 8/26/2025 113064 113064 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY (Continued) Total : 282.44 181840 8/26/2025 113299 MERRIMAC ENERGY GROUP 2241046 037-10463 87 OCTANE REGULAR UNLEADED FUEL 30,975.91 Total : 30,975.91
181841 8/26/2025 113299 MERRIMAC ENERGY GROUP 2241081 037-10463 87 OCTANE REGULAR UNLEADED FUEL 30,734.68 Total : 30,734.68
181842 8/26/2025 111749 MIDWEST BUS CORPORATION 60092 GTRANS AUTO SUPPLIES 541.28 Total : 541.28
181843 8/26/2025 112205 MILLIMETER MEDIA 25-001 PROFESSIONAL VIDEO SERVICES 750.00 Total : 750.00
181844 8/26/2025 107505 MOUSER ELECTRONICS, INC. 85702395 GTRANS AUTO SUPPLIES 123.81 85788291 GTRANS AUTO SUPPLIES 95.79
Total : 219.60
181845 8/26/2025 113355 MR. HOSE INC. 261195 PW AUTO PARTS 317.48 Total : 317.48
181846 8/26/2025 113605 MUTUAL LIQUID GAS & EQUIPMENT, CO., INC. 190762 SERVICE AGREEMENT PLAN 135.00 Total : 135.00
181847 8/26/2025 105622 N/S CORPORATION 0128528 037-10464 GTRANS BUS WASH EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 741.00 Total : 741.00
181848 8/26/2025 107030 NAPA AUTO PARTS 193256 PW AUTO PARTS 46.05 193433 PW AUTO PARTS 13.53
Total : 59.58
181849 8/26/2025 110575 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS, OF CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL 87385701 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 921.00 87387679 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 715.00
87465221 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 2,054.00
87470312 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 145.00
87542533 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 1,182.00
87622147 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 596.00
87622393 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 173.00
Page: 12
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
13 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181849 8/26/2025 110575 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS, OF CALIFORNIA, A MEDICAL (Continued) 87623578 023-01626 RANDOM TESTS 486.00
Total : 6,272.00
181850 8/26/2025 115168 OFFICE DEPOT 429140911 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 248.26 429142090 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.54
429142091 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.90
432599528 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 230.14
432780787 BUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 548.08
434205344 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 404.86
434206075 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 306.95
434253086 REC OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.68
434257630 REC OFFICE SUPPLIES 89.78
Total : 1,870.19
181851 8/26/2025 113530 ONGBUECO, RODOLFO PERMIT #18559 PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND - 14029 S BUDLONG 500.00 Total : 500.00
181852 8/26/2025 111358 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 171757 PW AUTO PARTS 141.35 174603 PW AUTO PARTS 56.00
174636 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 56.17
174961 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 126.56
Total : 380.08
181853 8/26/2025 115810 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 282596174 PEST CONTROL - ACCT #27336703 347.00 282596175 PEST CONTROL - ACCT #27336703 347.00
283646040 PEST CONTROL - ACCT #27336703 277.00
Total : 971.00
181854 8/26/2025 108382 OSORIO, CLINT 07/10-07/13 2025 ICA SEMINAR - PER DIEM 225.00 Total : 225.00
181855 8/26/2025 112189 PERFECT SCORE ATHLETIC, TRAINING CENTER07/09-07/30/25 GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR SERVICES 2,975.00 Total : 2,975.00
181856 8/26/2025 112859 PET HAVEN CEMETERY 19381 032-00213 PROFESSIONAL CREMATORY SERVICES 1,020.00 Total : 1,020.00
Page: 13
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
14 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181857 8/26/2025 116140 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE, INC. 844635 TIRES - 1L4366 11R225 G HANKOOK AH37 1,599.86 Total : 1,599.86
181858 8/26/2025 106092 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 41042769 COG EMBLEM CHARGE 791.18 43043010 034-00712 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 1,411.82
43043012 034-00712 UNIFORM & SUPPLY RENTAL 32.85
43043013 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - GTRANS 51.20
43044739 034-00712 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 43.70
43044741 034-00712 UNIFORM & SUPPLY RENTAL 32.85
43044742 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - GTRANS 51.20
43044743 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - NCC 13.65
43044744 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - CH 19.00
43044745 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - PD 91.60
43044746 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - HS 11.88
43046458 034-00712 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 43.70
43046460 034-00712 UNIFORM & SUPPLY RENTAL 32.85
43046461 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - GTRANS 51.20
43048085 034-00712 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 43.70
43048087 034-00712 UNIFORM & SUPPLY RENTAL 31.90
43048088 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - GTRANS 51.20
43048089 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - NCC 13.65
43048090 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - CH 19.00
43048091 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - PD 91.60
43048092 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - HS 11.88
43050068 034-00712 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES 2,986.32
43050070 034-00712 UNIFORM & SUPPLY RENTAL 31.90
43050071 034-00712 SUPPLY RENTAL - MATS - GTRANS 51.20
43051264 037-10473 UNIFORM & SUPPLY RENTAL 321.51
Total : 6,332.54
181859 8/26/2025 116575 PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTING, ASSOCIATES, INC. 900676 INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOTHERAPY 289.00 900776 INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOTHERAPY 578.00
Total : 867.00
181860 8/26/2025 105519 QRS LIGHTING SERVICES 11071 REPAIRED (21) BALLFIELD LIGHTS AND BALLA 3,403.59 Total : 3,403.59
Page: 14
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
15 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181861 8/26/2025 111574 RACE COMMUNICATIONS RC1680303 023-01621 FIBER INTERNET SERVICES - JULY 2025 5,789.24 RC1723042 023-01621 FIBER INTERNET SERVICES - AUGUST 2025 5,789.24 Total : 11,578.48
181862 8/26/2025 103072 REACH 0082553 EAP SERVICES/REACHLINE NEWSLETTER 902.00 Total : 902.00
181863 8/26/2025 118228 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF, THE IN00359756 CA MUNICIPAL LAW HANDBOOK 2025 674.85 Total : 674.85
181864 8/26/2025 100836 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 4058910 STREET MAINT SUPPLIES 81.65 Total : 81.65
181865 8/26/2025 107146 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC. U.S.A. 21565 BAL STREET MAINT SUPPLIES 50.00 Total : 50.00
181866 8/26/2025 113472 ROBERTS, KRISTINA PERMIT #18493 PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND - 1328 W 164TH ST 3,000.00 Total : 3,000.00
181867 8/26/2025 108942 RS AMERICAS, INC. 9021036371 GTRANS AUTO SUPPLIES 410.62 Total : 410.62
181868 8/26/2025 119126 S.B.R.P.C.A. 04654 PD AUTO PARTS 340.14 04655 PD AUTO PARTS 523.76
04656 PD AUTO PARTS 680.69
04669 PD AUTO PARTS 1,469.65
04670 PD AUTO PARTS 734.83
04673 PD AUTO PARTS 623.22
04678 PD AUTO PARTS 340.25
Total : 4,712.54
181869 8/26/2025 110333 S.C. SIGNS & SUPPLIES LLC 261133 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 1,288.69 Total : 1,288.69
181870 8/26/2025 119015 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 97543334 SERVICE AQUEOUS PARTS WASHER 299.80 97597175 PW CLARIFIER CLEANING SERVICES 3,503.30
Total : 3,803.10
Page: 15
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
16 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181871 8/26/2025 105934 SANTIN, STEPHANY 07/10-07/12 2025 ICA SEMINAR - PER DIEM 318.00 Total : 318.00
181872 8/26/2025 110772 SANTOS, VICTOR D. 07/14-07/17 GILLIG BUS VEHICLE INSPECTIONS - AIR 861.91 Total : 861.91
181873 8/26/2025 113526 SARVAIYA, ARTH RECEIPT #67376 CASINO BADGE REFUND 95.00 Total : 95.00
181874 8/26/2025 108654 SECTRAN SECURITY INC. 25072488 ARMORED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES - GTRANS 1,440.55 Total : 1,440.55
181875 8/26/2025 119378 SMARDAN SUPPLY CO. S4249393 GTRANS FACILITY SUPPLIES 297.11 Total : 297.11
181876 8/26/2025 102027 SOUTH BAY ELECTRIC MOTORS, INC 27371 BUS AUTO PARTS 2,802.43 Total : 2,802.43
181877 8/26/2025 119447 SOUTH BAY FORD 550384 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 2,152.94 551842 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 12.16
552089 GTRANS AUTO PARTS 203.76
CM546459 GTRANS AUTO PARTS -24.55
Total : 2,344.31
181878 8/26/2025 112633 SOUTH BAY KUSTOMZ, LLC 14705 2023 FORD EXPLR #P06 SERVICE & REPAIRS 1,917.56 14706 REC TRAILER JACK INSTALLATION 139.98
14707 2015 TOYOTA VAN #SUI-3 BATTERY REPLACEME 279.17
14709 2022 FORD EXPLR #P18 SERVICE & REPAIRS 1,415.35
Total : 3,752.06
181879 8/26/2025 619003 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 080125 LIGHT & POWER 43,873.08 Total : 43,873.08
181880 8/26/2025 101570 SOUTHWEST OFFSET PRINTING CO., INC. 208446 034-00690 RESOURCE GUIDE SUMMER/FALL 2025 8,636.68 Total : 8,636.68
181881 8/26/2025 111475 SPEARS, HARRY RECEIPT #82231137 MAINTENANCE DEPOSIT REFUND 100.00 Page: 16
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
17 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181881 8/26/2025 111475 111475 SPEARS, HARRY (Continued) Total : 100.00 181882 8/26/2025 108338 STEAMX, LLC 73092 GTRANS MAINT SUPPLIES 80.91 Total : 80.91
181883 8/26/2025 100609 TANK SPECIALISTS OF CALIFORNIA 35261 CERTIFIED DESIGNATED OPERATOR SERVICE 198.00 Total : 198.00
181884 8/26/2025 113297 TECHNICAL MASTERY SOCCER 07/07-07/30/25 SOCCER INSTRUCTOR 1,020.00 Total : 1,020.00
181885 8/26/2025 110238 TIREHUB, LLC 51595649 TIRES - GY EAGLE ENFORCER BW 108V 255 1,689.52 Total : 1,689.52
181886 8/26/2025 113105 TORRES, EVELYN RECEIPT #82718726 MAINTENANCE DEPOSIT REFUND 250.00 Total : 250.00
181887 8/26/2025 113525 TRI-CITY COMMUNITY EMERGENCY TANAKA 24/25 COMMUNITY PROMOTION 250.00 Total : 250.00
181888 8/26/2025 111481 TRIO COMMUNITY MEALS, LLC INV2230067787 034-00705 SENIOR FEEDING PROGRAM 10,289.55 INV2230068174 034-00705 SENIOR FEEDING PROGRAM 6,922.08 INV2230068175 034-00705 SENIOR FEEDING PROGRAM 2,403.50 INV2230068924 034-00705 SENIOR FEEDING PROGRAM 9,468.75 Total : 29,083.88
181889 8/26/2025 109900 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT, SYSTEMS SANTIN 06/23/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 05/23-06/23/25 33,171.93 Total : 33,171.93
181890 8/26/2025 109900 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT, SYSTEMS FINANCE 07/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 1,709.21 FINANCE 7/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 9,955.97 OROZCO 06/23/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 05/23-06/23/25 4,358.72 PD TRAINING 06/23/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 05/23-06/23/25 3,064.00 PD TRAINING 07/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 1,002.85 PD TRAINING2 6/23/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 05/23-06/23/25 570.70 PD TRAINING2 7/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 647.97 PD TRAINING3 5/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 04/23-05/22/25 4,375.54 PD TRAINING3 7/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 29.99 Page: 17
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
18 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181890 8/26/2025 109900 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT, SYSTEMS (Continued) PD TRAINING4 7/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 520.98 SANTOS 07/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 2,630.95 SANTOS 7/22/25 CAL CARD STATEMENT 06/24-07/22/25 2,252.41 Total : 31,119.29
181891 8/26/2025 107274 U.S. TOW, INC. 02024 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2011 103.60 02972 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2003 70.00
02976 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2301 74.68
02982 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #739 70.00
02983 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2316 70.00
02991 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2011 103.60
02993 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2011 103.60
02995 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR BUS #2309 70.00
03138 037-10388 TOWING SERVICES FOR FORD F350 TROLLEY 70.00 Total : 735.48
181892 8/26/2025 104692 ULINE 193966734 PD PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3,406.46 194342767 PD PROGRAM SUPPLIES 407.11
196295500 BUS SHOP SUPPLIES 103.71
Total : 3,917.28
181893 8/26/2025 121275 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT, OF SC 25-260209 CA STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS 49.29 720250305 NEW TICKET CHARGES 220.00
Total : 269.29
181894 8/26/2025 107596 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 90147642 024-01008 ENGINEERING SERVICES - ARTESIA BLVD/PE, 2,816.35 Total : 2,816.35
181895 8/26/2025 106754 URBAN RESTORATION GROUP US, INC. 00049200 STREET MAINT SUPPLIES 2,769.82 Total : 2,769.82
181896 8/26/2025 122050 VERIZON WIRELESS 6118993195 REC CELL PHONE SERVICE 1,122.58 Total : 1,122.58
181897 8/26/2025 122435 VISTA PAINT CORPORATION 2025-008692-00 STREET MAINT SUPPLIES 596.70 2025-038305-00 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 100.91
Page: 18
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
19 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181897 8/26/2025 122435 122435 VISTA PAINT CORPORATION (Continued) Total : 697.61 181898 8/26/2025 108657 VORTEX INDUSTRIES, INC. 07-2067257 SERVICE REPAIR - GTRANS FACILITY DOORS 1,614.46 Total : 1,614.46
181899 8/26/2025 108657 VORTEX INDUSTRIES, INC. 07-2064750 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - PD 1,310.00 Total : 1,310.00
181900 8/26/2025 108353 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO S127896163 GTRANS FACILITIES SUPPLIES 357.03 S127896163.002 GTRANS FACILITIES SUPPLIES 161.61
S127938677 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 4,900.13
S128126554 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 3,216.88
S128162467 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 1,991.15
S128289637 024-01171 TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES REPLACEMENT 17,278.89 S128359896 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 2,076.11
S128359896.002 SIGNS/SIGNALS SUPPLIES 2,290.72
Total : 32,272.52
181901 8/26/2025 101903 WATER TECHNIQUES 17273 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM RENTAL 45.00 Total : 45.00
181902 8/26/2025 104107 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 83402677 BUS WASH SUPPLIES 313.57 Total : 313.57
181903 8/26/2025 112737 WELLS FARGO VENDOR FINANCIAL, SERVICES, LLC 5034728288 023-01622 CITYWIDE COPIER LEASE - JULY 2025 3,734.92 5035106490 023-01622 CITYWIDE COPIER LEASE - AUGUST 2025 3,734.92 Total : 7,469.84
181904 8/26/2025 125001 YAMADA COMPANY, INC. 85099 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 146.38 85100 TREE MAINT SUPPLIES 92.96
85112 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 71.39
85114 PARK MAINT SUPPLIES 72.62
85116 TREE MAINT SUPPLIES 16.41
Total : 399.76
181905 8/26/2025 111102 YOO, IN KYUNG 080625 MGMT ANNUAL HEALTH BENEFIT 368.00 Total : 368.00
Page: 19
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
20 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 181906 8/26/2025 113347 ZECO, INC. 03 024-01140 ROWLEY PARK BASKETBALL COURT REHAB, JN53 341,664.21 Total : 341,664.21
181907 8/26/2025 126122 ZEP SALES & SERVICE 9011550369 BUS SHOP SUPPLIES 163.65 Total : 163.65
160 Vouchers for bank code : usb Bank total : 2,971,033.60 160 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 2,971,033.60 Page: 20
08/21/2025
Voucher List

CITY OF GARDENA
21 1:47:18PM
vchlist Page:

Bank code : usb
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount

CLAIMS VOUCHER APPROVAL
I hereby certify that the demands or claims covered by the checks listed on pages _____ to _____ inclusive of the check register are accurate and funds are available for payment thereof.

By: __________________________________________
Director of Administrative Services
This is to certify that the claims or demands covered by checks listed on pages _____ to _____ inclusive of the check register have been audited by the City Council of the City of Gardena and that all of the said checks are approved for payment except check numbers:
______________________________________________________
_________________________ __________
Mayor Date
_________________________ __________
Councilmember Date
_________________________ __________
Councilmember Date
Acknowledged:
_________________________ __________
Councilmember Date
_________________________ __________
Councilmember Date
Page: 21
1 20
1 20
08/26/2025
Report No. P-2025-14
1 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: PERSONNEL REPORT

1. Report the appointment of the following individuals:
a. JO-ANNE BURNS, to the position of Assistant Director of Community Development, Schedule 141 ($13,217 – $16,869/month), with the Community Development Department, effective August 4, 2025.

2. Report the Separation of the following employees:
a. SHAWN WASHINGTON, Bus Operator with the Transportation Department, effective August 4, 2025. Mr. Washington provided 4 months of service to the City. b. CARLY DYE, Court Liaison with the Police Department, effective August 7, 2025. Ms.

Dye provided 1 year of service to the City.
c. CAROLINA RUIZ-UGAITAFA, Human Resources Coordinator with the Administrative Services Department, effective August 12, 2025. Ms. Ruiz-Ugaitafa provided 8 months of service to the City.
d. CAMILLE DURAN, Recreation Coordinator with the Recreation & Human Services Department, effective August 16, 2025. Ms. Duran provided 1.2 years of full-time service to the City.

3. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Account Clerk (Administrative Services Department). This recruitment is open until filled.

4. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Community Services Officer (Community Development Department). This recruitment is open until filled.

5. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Police Officer/Lateral (Police Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

6. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Police Trainee (Police Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

7. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Police Service Officer (Police Department). This recruitment is scheduled to close August 27, 2025.

8. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Lifeguard (Recreation and Human Services Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

9. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Lifeguard/Instructor (Recreation and Human Services Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

10. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Recreation Leader I/II (Recreation and Human Services Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

11. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Payroll/Personnel Technician (Transportation Department). This recruitment is open until filled.

Report No. P-2025-14
2 12. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Bus Operator (Transportation Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

13. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of On-Demand Transit Dispatcher (Transportation Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

14. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Transportation Operations Supervisor (Transportation Department). This is a continuous recruitment.

15. Report the Recruitment for the Open/Competitive position of Transportation Operations Training Coordinator (Transportation Department). This recruitment is scheduled to close September 11, 2025.

City of Gardena
Gardena City Council
Meeting

AGENDA REPORT

SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9E.

Section: CONSENT

CALENDAR
Meeting Date: August 26,
2025
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 1885, Amending Chapter 10.32 Special Speed Zones of the Gardena Municipal Code and Declare California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption.

COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Staff Recommendation: Adoption of Ordinance No. 1885
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

On August 12, 2025, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 1885 to Amend Chapter 10.32 Special Speed Zones of the Gardena Municipal Code and Declare California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Exemption.

The City contracted with AGA Engineers, Inc. to conduct an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The purpose of this survey is to update the speed limits at various segments throughout the City of Gardena.

In California, cities and counties must comply with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358 to establish speed limits within their jurisdictions. Roadways within business and residential districts have a statutory speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while alleys and blind intersections are limited to15 miles per hour. These statutory limits are established by state law. As such they are not typically included in the study. Intermediate speed limits between 15 and 65 miles per hour may be established by local authorities based on the results of an engineering and traffic survey.

This engineering speed study was conducted per CVC Section 627 and includes documentation of existing roadway conditions, radar spot speed surveys, and mid-block collision analysis. A total of 63 roadway segments throughout the City were surveyed. The collision rate for these segments was found well below the expected collision rates published by the State of California.

Based on the radar speed survey, collision history and field conditions, it is recommended that most existing posted speed limits remain unchanged.  However, reductions are recommended for 7 of the 63 segments surveyed (See attached report for details). Engineering and Traffic Surveys are typically updated every five years, and once completed, any necessary revisions must be reflected in the Gardena Municipal Code.

Accordingly, staff recommends that the City Council introduce Ordinance No. 1885, amending Chapter 10.32, "Special Speed Zones", of the Gardena Municipal Code to align with the updated Engineering and Traffic Survey findings.

Additionally, declare that the adoption of this ordinance is categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Article  5, Section 15061 (b), (3), "the common sense exemption". The action is largely administrative in nature and designed to improve, not degrade, environmental quality, such that there is no possibility that adopting this Ordinance would adversely affect the environment in any manner that could be significant.

FISCAL IMPACT/COST:

None
APPROVED:
___________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
Attachments
Ordinance No.1885.docx.pdf
Engineering and Traffic Survey - 2025.pdf
ORDINANCE NO. 1885

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GARDENA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.32 (SPECIAL SPEED

ZONES) OF THE GARDENA MUNCIPAL CODE TO

DESIGNATING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS IN

THE CITY OF GARDENA AND FINDING THE ACTION IS

EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO THE COMMON SENSE
EXEMPTION OF CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061
(b)(3)
WHEREAS, Cities and Counties in California are required to follow the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 22357 and 22358 to establish speed limits within their jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, CVC Sections 22357 and 22358 grant the City authority to determine and declare speed limits, other than those established as prima facie by CVC Section 22352, by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Engineering and Traffic Surveys were conducted for various roadway segments throughout the City consistent with Section 627 of the CVC; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gardena has considered all evidence presented, both written and oral, at a public hearing held on the 12th day of August 2025; and
WHEREAS, based on the Engineering and Traffic Surveys completed, the City Council finds and determines that the speed limits set forth in the table below are those most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are responsible and safe and shall be the prima facie speed limits for the areas identified herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 10.32.010 – “Increasing state speed limits in certain zones” of the Gardena Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 10.32.010 – “Designated speed limits on certain zones.” In accordance with the provisions of Section 22357 and Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, the City of Gardena hereby determines that the speed limits on certain streets are necessary for the orderly and safe movement of traffic in the City of Gardena. Based on the Engineering and Traffic Surveys completed, the City Council finds Docusign Envelope ID: 05A42B0C-7B96-4201-8F55-5051B0C4D544 Ordinance No. 1885
2 and determines that the speed limits set forth below are those most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are responsible and safe and shall be the prima facie speed limits for the areas identified herein.

Docusign Envelope ID: 05A42B0C-7B96-4201-8F55-5051B0C4D544 Ordinance No. 1885
3 Docusign Envelope ID: 05A42B0C-7B96-4201-8F55-5051B0C4D544 Ordinance No. 1885
4 SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that the adoption of the local amendments thereof is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under CEQA Guideline section 15061(b)(3) (the commonsense exemption). The action is largely administrative in nature and designed to improve and not degrade environmental quality such that there is no possibility that adopting this Ordinance would adversely affect the environment in any manner that could be significant. As such, staff is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, Docusign Envelope ID: 05A42B0C-7B96-4201-8F55-5051B0C4D544 Ordinance No. 1885
5 irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting at which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published as required by law, in a publication of general circulation.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall not become effective or be in force until thirty (30) days from and after the date of its adoption.

Passed, approved, and adopted this 26th day of August 2025.

TASHA CERDA, Mayor
ATTEST:

MINA SEMENZA, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CARMEN VASQUEZ, City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 05A42B0C-7B96-4201-8F55-5051B0C4D544 Engineering & Traffic Survey
211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835 || (714) 992-4592 || [email protected] Prepared for the
City of Gardena
July 2025
City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates i

CERTIFICATION
I, Ruben Perales, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Gardena was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type and duly registered in the State of California as a professional Traffic Engineer. 7/7/2025
Ruben Perales Date
RCE #83169, RTE #2838
Traffic No. 2838
City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page

1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1

2.0 Study Methodology................................................................................................. 3

3.0 Survey Results......................................................................................................... 4

3.1 Street Surveillance........................................................................................ 4

3.2 Accident Rate Analysis.................................................................................. 4

3.3 Spot Speed Survey........................................................................................ 7

4.0 Survey Findings and Recommendations................................................................. 9

4.1 Speed Limit Signing – General...................................................................... 9

5.0 Summary and Conclusions.................................................................................... 13 Tables
1 2025 Speed Zone Survey – Collision Survey Analysis ............................................. 6 2 2025 City of Gardena Segment Spot Speed Survey.............................................. 10 Appendices
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits and Definition of Terms B Speed Zoning Regulations from Caltrans
C Traffic Radar Certifications
D Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Reports
E Engineering and Traffic Survey Raw Data
City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 1 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) conducted to update the speed limits at various segments throughout the City of Gardena.

The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within city boundaries. Roadways within business and residential districts have an established speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while alleys and blind intersections are 15 miles per hour.

Both speed limits are designated by California law. As such they are not typically included in the study. Intermediate speed limits between 15 and 65 miles per hour may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys.

It is a common belief that posting speed limit traffic signs will influence drivers to drive at that speed; however, the facts indicate otherwise. Driver behavioral research conducted in many parts of this country over a span of several decades shows that the average driver is influenced by the appearance of the highway itself and the prevailing traffic conditions in choosing the speed at which a person drives. Recognizing this, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that speed limits be established in accordance with appropriate engineering practice and methods. Excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits and definition of terms used in speed zone surveys are detailed in Appendix A.

This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the CVC Section 627 have been satisfied and that other conditions not readily apparent to motorists are properly identified. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802 of the CVC requires that speed limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC. The limits must be justified by an E&TS conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. However, a change in State law allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or fourteen years depending on specific criteria1.

The latest edition of the CVC has highlighted bicycle and pedestrian safety as part of the study, and this aspect was considered as a part of this report. Additionally, effective January 1, 2022, several of the CVC sections mentioned above were amended and additional sections were added related to traffic safety and speed limits. These changes to the CVC were made in accordance with Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43) which was approved by the State of California on October 8, 2021. AB 43 is included in Appendix A for reference.

The following are some key highlights of AB 43:
- Allows a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph on State highways located in any business or residential district.
- Authorizes Caltrans and a local authority to declare a speed of 20 or 15 mph on State highways. - Authorizes a lower speed limit on a section of highway contiguous to a business activity district.

Definition of “business activity district” is identified in AB 43 text. 1 Refer to Appendix A for specific survey criteria.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 2 - Authorizes a local authority to further reduce the speed limit beyond the 5-mph reduction after June 30, 2024, if certain conditions are met.
- Extends the validity of speed surveys from 10 years to 14 years if evaluated by a registered engineer. - Local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

The current study will validate and/or decrease the existing speed limits along the study segments based on the data and results of this survey. The surveys were conducted in February of 2025.

Spot speed surveys were taken at the project segments throughout the City of Gardena in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing prima facie speed limits. The data was collected per the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), Revision 9. Sections of the CA MUTCD detailing regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B.

The actual speed zone surveys were conducted by National Data and Surveying Services, Inc. (NDS) and AGA Engineers, Inc. (AGA). A California registered traffic engineer from AGA reviewed the streets, the survey data, and the crash statistics to arrive at the recommended speed limits for each segment.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 3 SECTION 2.0 – STUDY METHODOLOGY
The study involved three categories of data collection and analysis: (1) geometric and characteristic street surveillance; (2) collision rate analysis; and (3) spot speed survey.

The street surveillance process used field observations to determine the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and pavement markings, land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and other roadway characteristics that may not be readily apparent to motorists.

Historical collision data was obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024 (i.e., two years) for the roadway segments. The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit by using the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes provided by the City.

Spot speed surveys, utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted at sixty-three (63) segment locations to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A copy of the “Traffic Radar Certification” is provided in Appendix C. Typically, a minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the streets included in the study. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile travel speed, 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed, percentage of vehicles within the 10-mph pace, median speed, and other pertinent data for analysis.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 4 SECTION 3.0 – SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Street Surveillance
Section 2B.13 “Speed Limit Signs” of the CA MUTCD (see Appendix B) states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment (rounded per standard mathematical practice) to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further change in speed. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented in the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

The survey streets were reviewed by Mr. Ruben Perales, P.E., T.E, Vice President at AGA Engineers, Inc., who is a registered Traffic Engineer in the State of California. The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver, land use types adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.), and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, etc.) were recorded as part of the study. The roadway characteristics were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of a five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627 and if roadway segments have changed since the preparation of the previous E&TS dated June 2021. The speed survey segment roadway characteristics for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix D.

3.2 Accident Rate Analysis
The collision rate for each speed survey segment was determined using the most recent available collision records as required by CVC Section 627. The mid-block collision totals are based on a review of the collision reports from SWITRS from (January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024. Subsequently, these totals were used to calculate the mid-block collision rate, which also uses ADT volume data. ADT count data was provided by the City for all project segments and is included in Appendix E. The mid-block collision rate for each street surveyed was calculated in terms of “collisions per million vehicle miles traveled” (C/MVM) and is shown on the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Reports. The following shows a sample calculation.

The rate was calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock Collisions × 106
24-hour volume × 365 × segment length × number of years The number of mid-block collisions is based on three years’ collision data (January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024), recent 24-hour traffic volume (for both directions) within the survey segment, and the segment’s length given in miles.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 5 Example:

Segment: Artesia Boulevard between Western Avenue and Normandie Avenue:

Collision Rate = 9 × 106
46,982 × 365 × 0.59 × 2
= 0.44 C/MVM
The Average Expected Collision Rate for this segment is 0.87 and is based on the “2022 Crash Data on California State Highways2. Therefore, the calculated collision rate of 0.44 is well below the expected rate for this segment.

The results of the collision rate calculations, including the Average Expected Collision Rates for each type of roadways, are shown in Table 1 on the following page and detailed in Appendix E. The following Average Expected Collision Rates were obtained from “2022 Crash Data on California State Highways” published by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans):
♦ Conventional 2 lanes or less (<45 mph): 1.07 C/MVM
♦ Conventional 2 lanes or less (> 45 mph): 0.61 C/MVM
♦ Undivided 4 lanes (<45 mph): 0.66 C/MVM
♦ Undivided 4 lanes (> 45 mph): 0.77 C/MVM
♦ Divided 4 lanes (<45 mph): 0.64 C/MVM
♦ Divided 4 lanes (> 45 mph): 0.93 C/MVM
♦ Divided 5 lanes or more (<45 mph): 0.75 C/MVM
♦ Divided 5 lanes or more (> 45 mph): 0.87 C/MVM
2 2022 Crash Data on California State Highways, State of California Department of Transportation.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 6 City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 7 3.3 Spot Speed Survey
Spot speed surveys were conducted at each street segment to assess the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. A reasonable and effective speed limit is based on the premise that a speed limit, thus established, conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should typically be established at the five mph increment nearest the 85th percentile speed recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as street surveillance (Section 3.1) and collision rates (Section 3.2) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits.

The criteria used in conducting the radar survey are listed in Appendix B. The information collected and data calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 8 ♦ Date and time of speed survey ♦ Collision history and rate ♦ Direction of survey ♦ Posted speed limit
♦ Number of vehicles observed ♦ Average speed
♦ Pedestrian and bicycle activity ♦ Range of speeds
♦ Road description ♦ 50th and 85th Percentile speed
♦ Average Daily Traffic ♦ 10 mph and percent over pace speed Appendix D contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 9 SECTION 4.0 – SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation as defined by CVC Section 627 and the recently adopted Assembly Bill No. 43, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limits five miles per hour below the observed 85th percentile speed.

It should be noted that the regulations found in Appendix B also state that “the establishment of a speed limit of five mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care”.

The factors to be considered are:
- Most recent accident record (mid-block) - Profile condition - Roadway design speed - Intersection spacing offsets
- Safe stopping sight distance - Commercial driveway characteristics (land use) - Super-elevation - Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks - Grades - Pedestrian and bicycle safety
- Shoulder condition
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix D. The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). The 2025 Accident Survey Analysis (Table 1) lists the total number of accidents, calculated accident rate, and the expected accident rate. Table 2 on the next page shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. California Vehicle Code sections are defined in Appendix A.

4.1 Speed Limit Signing
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 65 mph statutory or prima facie speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. The maximum speed limit on most California highways is 65 mph. However, drivers are permitted to travel 70 mph where posted as such.

Unless otherwise posted, the maximum speed limit in California is 55 mph on two-lane undivided highways and for vehicles towing trailers – provided the street is not within a business or residential district.

Consequently, speed limit signs covering these prima facie conditions need not be posted on city streets.

Although not required by law, speed limit signs for these limits can be posted by a jurisdiction when an engineer determines doing so would enhance public awareness and compliance of the basic speed law.

Typically, such postings occur upon streets that have the following:
- Significant daily vehicular traffic volumes - Cut-through traffic problems - Significant grades - Continued violation of 25 mph speed zones - Safe stopping sight distance - Commercial driveway characteristics (land use) - Other unusual characteristics
City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 10 City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 11 City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 12 It is standard engineering practice to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only on streets that have specific speed limits enacted by city ordinance or determined to be justified by an engineer who has performed an E&TS.

When an E&TS shows that the statutory or prima facie speed limits are not applicable for the existing conditions, the speed limits can be altered with the posting of a different speed limit, which must be determined according to the findings of the study. CVC Section 22354 covers decreasing highway speeds from 65 mph, and CVC Section 22358 addresses decreasing local speed limits. The CVC does not address decreasing the speed limit below 55 mph on undivided highways; however, the CA MUTCD states that speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established based on an E&TS that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. Even though it is not codified in the CVC, Caltrans has established the practice of using an E&TS for any reduction below a statutory 55 mph speed limit. Law enforcement agencies and courts are accustomed to seeing surveys for these areas and it may be difficult to defend a speed violation citation without one.

Speed limit signs should be installed at approximately every one-half mile on streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are typically installed at the beginning of the speed zone on the departure side of a traffic signal-controlled intersection. It is also advisable to install signs at key intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate notice of the speed limit without over signing, since doing so increases maintenance costs and rarely results in increased compliance.

The CA MUTCD outlines speed limit sign size specifications based on the type of roadway facility. Sign sizes vary from a minimum of 24-inches by 30-inches on a single lane conventional roadway to 48-inches by 60-inches on a freeway. It is also important to post signs in a manner that they are clearly visible to approaching traffic from a distance. Care should be taken to maintain landscaping and other vegetation, so it does not grow to block the motorist’s view of the signs. In certain circumstances, when an engineer has determined that additional motorist awareness of the speed limit is needed, the speed limit can also be painted on the roadway surface immediately adjacent to a speed limit sign.

Enforcement problems can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted, or (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 13 SECTION 5.0 – SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
An engineering speed study was conducted per CVC Section 627 and includes documentation of existing roadway conditions, radar spot speed surveys, and midblock collision analysis. A total of 63 roadway segments at various locations throughout the City of Gardena were surveyed. The collision rate for these segments is well below the expected collision rates published by the State of California unless otherwise noted. Based on the radar speed survey, collision history, and field conditions, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limits on the various project segments be retained as existing with the exception of the following segments listed below.

Speed Limit Establishments
♦ Artesia Boulevard between Western Avenue and Normandie Avenue, it is recommended that a speed limit of 45 mph be established. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 46 mph, and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended that the speed limit be established at 45 mph. ♦ Artesia Boulevard between Normandie Avenue and Vermont Avenue, it is recommended that a speed limit of 45 mph be established. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 43 mph, and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended that the speed limit be established at 45 mph. ♦ Crenshaw Boulevard between El Segundo Boulevard and 135th Street, it is recommended that a speed limit of 40 mph be established. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 45 mph, CVC 22358.6(b), existing bus stops, on-street parking, multiple driveways, and for continuity of speed, it is recommended that the speed limit be established at 40 mph.
♦ Crenshaw Boulevard between 135th Street and Rosecrans Avenue, it is recommended that a speed limit of 40 mph be established. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 45 mph, CVC 22358.6(b), on-street parking, multiple driveways, and continuity of speed, it is recommended that the speed limit be established at 40 mph.
♦ Rosecrans Avenue between Crenshaw Boulevard and Van Ness Avenue, it is recommended that a speed limit of 40 mph be established. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 45 mph, CVC 22358.6(b), multiple driveways, the adjacent shopping center area, and for continuity of speed, it is recommended that the speed limit be established at 40 mph.
♦ Rosecrans Avenue between Van Ness Avenue and Western Avenue, it is recommended that a speed limit of 40 mph be established. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 45 mph, CVC 22358.6(b), multiple driveways, and continuity of speed, it is recommended that the speed limit be established at 40 mph.

Speed Limit Decreases
♦ Budlong Avenue between El Segundo Boulevard to 135th Street, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph be decreased to 30 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 34 mph, and CVC 22358.6(c), it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 30 mph.

City of Gardena Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limit Updates 14 ♦ Van Ness Avenue between El Segundo Boulevard and Rosecrans Avenue, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph be decreased to 30 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 29 mph, and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 30 mph. ♦ Van Ness Avenue between Rosecrans Avenue and Marine Avenue, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph be decreased to 30 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph, and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 30 mph. ♦ Van Ness Avenue between Marine Avenue and Redondo Beach Boulevard, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph be decreased to 30 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 32 mph, and CVC 22358.6(a), it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 30 mph. ♦ Vermont Avenue between 135th Street and Rosecrans Avenue, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 45 mph be decreased to 40 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 46 mph, CVC 22358.6(b), existing bus stops, on-street parking, and for continuity of speed, it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 40 mph.
♦ Vermont Avenue between Rosecrans Avenue and Redondo Beach Boulevard, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 45 mph be decreased to 40 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 47 mph, CVC 22358.6(b), on-street parking, adjacent church, adjacent senior center, and for continuity of speed, it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 40 mph. ♦ 178th Street between Western Avenue and Normandie Avenue, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph be decreased to 30 mph. Based on the 85th percentile speed of 35 mph, and CVC 22358.6(b), being a narrow roadway, on-street parking, and multiple driveways, it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 30 mph.

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
and Definition of Terms
Excerpts from California Vehicle Code
Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43)
AGA Engineers, Inc.
211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835
(714) 992-4592 Email: [email protected]

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS
Applicable Vehicle Code Sections
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 2 ends

2) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 3) Accident records.
4) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Rounding Speed Limit to the Nearest 5 mph of the 85th Percentile 21400. (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway. (c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway. (d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.

Maximum Speed Limit
22349. (a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane, undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of this subdivision, the following apply:
(1) A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel in each direction.
(2) Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 3 ends

(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane, undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate locations.

Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. 3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Such prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 4 ends

3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented.

A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

Increase of Local Limits
22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may be by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

Decrease of Local Limits
22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45,40,35,30, or 25 miles per hours, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

Decrease on Narrow Street
22358.3. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 5 ends

Decrease on Local Streets Near Schools or Senior Centers 22358.4. (a) (1) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey. (2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the school zone.
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration. (5) (A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 6 ends

from school grounds.
(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
(D) A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs incurred by the department under this subdivision.

Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Rounding of Speed Limits to the Nearest 5 mph of the 85th Percentile 22358.6. (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable. (c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b). (d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Reduction of Additional 5 mph
22358.7. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 7 ends

concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Retaining the Currently Adopted Speed Limit or Restoring Immediately Prior Adopted Speed Limit 22358.8 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
(b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Business Activity District
22358.9 (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.
(2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 8 ends

or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

Speed Trap Prohibition
40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

Speed Trap
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving objects. This subdivision does not apply to local street, road, school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 9 ends

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 223469, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 10 ends

years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(B) (i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II)If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) 40802.

Radar Speed Zone Surveys

Page 11 ends

Study Method
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

The study is conducted in accordance with the appropriate sections of the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), Section 2B-13, Speed Limit Sign (R2-D)
Surveys are conducted on arterial streets, collector streets, and selected local streets. Each of the selected streets was analyzed individually.

The accident analysis was based on a review of the City’s Traffic Accident Records (Crossroads). Only non-intersection accidents are included since intersection accidents are considered correctable using conventional intersection traffic controls such as stop signs or traffic signals.

Accident rates were computed using a formula that takes into account the number of accidents in the two-year period, the length of roadway being studied, and the average daily traffic volume. The rate is expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (Acc/MVM). The formula is:

Acc/MM = Number of Accidents x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days
Definitions of Terms
Average Daily Traffic Volume of traffic during a 24-hour period.

ECL Easterly City Limit (also WCL, NCL and SCL for Westerly, Northerly and Southerly).
85th Percentile (Critical Speed) The “speed” which 85% of the observed vehicles are not exceeding.

This speed is usually within 2 mph of the upper limit of the speed.

Mean Speed The average speed.

MPH or mph Miles Per Hour.

MVM or mvm Million Vehicle Miles. Accident rates are generally expressed as the number of accidents occurring per million vehicle miles traveled during a given time period.

Pace The 10 mph range of observed vehicle speeds containing the largest number of vehicles. A normal distribution will contain
approximately 70% of the sample within the pace, with 15% above and 15% below.

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from Caltrans
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 133
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
03 If used, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed in the roadway at the crosswalk location on the center line, on a lane line, or on a median island. The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be post-mounted on the left-hand or right-hand side of the roadway. 04 If used, the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed over the roadway at the crosswalk location.
05 An In-Street or Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be placed in advance of the crosswalk to educate road users about the State law prior to reaching the crosswalk, nor shall it be installed as an educational display that is not near any crosswalk.

Guidance:
06 If an island (see Chapter 3I) is available, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, if used, should be placed on the island.

Option:
07 If a Pedestrian Crossing (W11-2) warning sign is used in combination with an In-Street or an Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign, the W11-2 sign with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque may be post-mounted on the right-hand side of the roadway at the crosswalk location.

Standard:
08 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign and the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be used at signalized locations controlled approaches.
09 The STOP FOR legend shall only be used in States where the State law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
10 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend (except for the red STOP or YIELD sign symbols) and border on a white background, surrounded by an outer yellow or fluorescent yellowgreen background area (see Figure 2B-2). The Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend and border on a yellow or fluorescent yellow-green background at the top of the sign and a black legend and border on a white background at the bottom of the sign (see Figure 2B-2). 11 Unless the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign is placed on a physical island, the sign support shall be designed to bend over and then bounce back to its normal vertical position when struck by a vehicle.

Support:
12 The Provisions of Section 2A.18 concerning mounting height are not applicable for the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign.

Standard:
13 The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the pavement surface. The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign placed in an island shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the island surface.

Option:
14 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign may be used seasonably seasonally to prevent damage in winter because of plowing operations, and may be removed at night if the pedestrian activity at night is minimal. 15 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs, Overhead Pedestrian Crossing signs, and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk.

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 134
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates. Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles. 02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.
03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another.
04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable. 05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead. 10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes. 11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th-percentile speed of freeflowing traffic.

CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12a When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 135
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c).

Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed

12.4 mph from the 85th-percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B-103(CA) and 2B-104(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7. 12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.

CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.

Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways. 12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.

Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System 12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System. 12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.

CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a, Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 136
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.

Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:

1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.

2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more crash weighting factors, as provided in Paragraph 12p, of this section shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.

Option:
12p The crash weighting factors to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the "Safety Corridor" may include, but are not limited to, the factors included in Table 2B-105(CA). 12q Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed.

The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Standard:
12r The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12s Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.

Guidance:
12t A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.

Option:
12u For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur.
12v To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.

Standard:
12w A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.

Option:
12x Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12y Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised April 1, 2025 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 137
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet.

Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet.

Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.

Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS).

Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.

Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:

1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.

2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.

3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 138
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California)

4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.

5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.

6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.

7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c).
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15. 22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 139
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.

B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Caltrans District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 140
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) • Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone. • Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.

Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories. 35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 141
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352.
40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.

Standard:
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by Caltrans, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 142
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by Caltrans, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:

Standard:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 143
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2- 1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX.

The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs

California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 144
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Support:
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Caltrans District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of Caltrans retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits. • Caltrans may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night. • Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 145
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, Caltrans may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment. • A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.

Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352.
96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).

Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation. 99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training. • The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to fourteen years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised January 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 146
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys. An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
105 If warranted, the Caltrans District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.

Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part 6.

Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.

Section 2B.14 Truck Speed Limit Plaque (R2-2P)
Standard:
01 Where a special speed limit applies to trucks or other vehicles, the legend TRUCKS XX or such similar legend shall be displayed below the legend Speed Limit XX on the same sign or on a separate R2-2P plaque (see Figure 2B-3) below the standard legend.
02 The Truck Speed Limit (R2-2) sign shall not be used in California. The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used instead.
03 The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque shall be placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign to indicate the truck speed limit. It shall also be placed above the End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign to mark the end of truck speed limits.

Support:
04 Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.

Section 2B.15 Night Speed Limit Plaque (R2-3P)
Standard:
01 Where different speed limits are prescribed for day and night, both limits shall be posted.

Guidance:
02 A Night Speed Limit (R2-3P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) should be reversed using a white retroreflectorized legend and border on a black background.

Option:
03 A Night Speed Limit plaque may be combined with or installed below the standard Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Support:
04 Refer to CVC 22355.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised March 27, 2020 Part 2 – Signs

____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 258
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-1(CA). California Regulatory Sign and Plaque Sizes (Sheet 7 of 7)

Sign or Plaque Sign
Designation Section
Conventional Road
Single Expressway Freeway Minimum Oversized
Lane
MultiLane

FREEWAY - ACCESS RIGHTS

RESTRICTED ON THIS SECTION OF

HIGHWAY
S3-1(CA) 2B.39 30 x 24 30 x 24 --- --- --- ---

STATE PROPERTY - NO DUMPING -
NO PARKING - NO TRESPASSING S8(CA) 2B.111 36 x 22 36 x 22 --- --- --- ---

STATE PROPERTY - ANY PERSON

REMOVING OR MOLESTING SAME

WILL BE PROSECUTED
S20(CA) 2B.111 24 x 18 24 x 18 --- --- --- ---
Weigh Station Repair Service plaque S21(CA) 2B.60 36 x 24 36 x 24 --- --- --- --- Rest Area/Vista Point 8 HOUR
PARKING S23(CA) 2B.46,
2I.05 24 x 24 24 x 24 --- --- --- ---
DAYLIGHT HEADLIGHT SECTION S30-1(CA) 2B.64 84 x 54 84 x 54 --- --- --- ---

TURN ON HEADLIGHTS NEXT X
MILES S30-2(CA) 2B.64 108 x 54 108 x 54 --- --- --- ---

END DAYLIGHT HEADLIGHT
SECTION S30-3(CA) 2B.64 84 x 66 84 x 66 --- --- --- --- TURN ON HEADLIGHTS S30-4(CA) 2B.64 84 x 42 84 x 42 --- --- --- --- CHECK HEADLIGHTS S30-5(CA) 2B.64 84 x 42 84 x 42 --- --- --- --- Safety Corridor Sign S33(CA) 2B.64 102 x 48 102 x 48 --- --- --- --- Table 2B-101(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined
by Roadway Facility CVC Section
15 mph State or
local authority
 Railroad grade crossing with obstructed view
 Uncontrolled highway intersection with obstructed view  An alley
22352.a.1
15 & 20 mph State or
local authority
Where the prima facie speed of 25 mph is more than is reasonable or safe  Narrow street not exceeding 25 feet other than a State Highway in a business or residential area or in a public park
 Road near a school or senior center facility
22358.3 &
22358.4
25 mph State or
local authority
 Any highway in any business or residential district
 A street contiguous to senior citizen facility other than a State highway  Adjacent to a children’s playground in a public park, but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use facilities 22352.b &
22357.1
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised February 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates
Part 2 – Signs
Revised February 6, 2023

cle Code
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 259
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-102(CA). Standard Application of Speed Limits per California Vehicle Code Speed Determined by Roadway Facility CVC
Section
15 to 60 mph Caltrans State highway, based on an E&TS where ethe limit of 65 mph is more than reasonable or safe 22354
15 to 60 mph
Local city council
or county board
of supervisors for
Caltrans
State highway, local entities may conduct a public hearing on proposed increases or decreases and the State Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing
22354.5
30 to 65 mph Local authority
Any street other than a State highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where a speed > 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe
22357
15 to 60 mph Local authority
Any street other than a State highway, by ordinance, may post a prima facie speed limit based on an E&TS where the limit of 65 mph is more than is reasonable and safe
22358.8(a)
20 to 50 mph for
Trucks
State or
local authority
Highways under their respective jurisdiction where 55 mph is more than is reasonable or safe for vehicles mentioned in CVC 22406 (Trucks and other large vehicles)
22407
Maximum Speed
55 mph
State or
local authority
 Two-lane, undivided highway
 Any highway if driving any of the following vehicles:
a. Motortruck or truck tractor with > 3 axles
b. Passenger vehicle or bus towing any other vehicle
c. School bus transporting any school pupil
d. A farm labor vehicle when transporting passengers
e. A vehicle transporting explosives
f. A trailer bus
22349.b & .c
and 22406
Maximum Speed
Limit of 65 mph
State or
local authority
Any highway, posted at 65 mph based upon an E&TS, for
vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22349(a) &
22349
Maximum
Freeway Speed
Limit 70 mph
Caltrans
Freeways, after consultation with the California Highway Patrol, based upon an E&TS, or upon the basis of appropriate designs standards and projected traffic volumes in the case of newly constructed freeway segments, for vehicles not subject to CVC 22406
22356

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 260
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-103(CA). Examples showing applicability of rounding and additional speed reduction on State Highway System
85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to
nearest 5 mph
increment (CVC
22358.6(a))
If rounding to
nearest is up,
may round down
(CVC 22358.6(c))
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))

47.5-50.0 50 45 N/A

45.1-47.4 45 N/A 40

42.5-45.0 45 40 N/A

40.1-42.4 40 N/A 35
Note – CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 & 22358.9 are applicable to local agency roadways and public properties subjected to CVC, they are not applicable to the State Highway System. Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.

Table 2B-104(CA). Examples showing applicability of rounding and additional speed reduction on Local Agency’s Roadways & Private Property Subjected to CVC
85th-Percentile
Speed (mph)
Rounding to
nearest 5 mph
increment (CVC
22358.6(a))
If rounding to
nearest is up,
may round down
(CVC 22358.6(c))
If rounding to
nearest is down,
may additionally
lower by 5 mph
(CVC 22358.6(b))
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of
bicyclists &
pedestrians, may
additionally lower by
5 mph (CVC 22358.7)*

47.5-50.0 50 45 N/A 40

45.1-47.4 45 N/A 40 35

42.5-45.0 45 40 N/A 35

40.1-42.4 40 N/A 35 30
* Note – CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 & 22358.9 are applicable to local agency roadways and private properties subjected to CVC, they are not applicable to the State Highway System. Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.

Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised February 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

Table 2B-105(CA). Safety Corridor Factors
Category Factors
Crash Weighting Factors to
Develop One Serious/Fatal
Injury Safety Corridor
 Crash severity: Fatal Crashes, Serious Injury Crashes  Mode: Pedestrian-bicycle related crashes, vehicle/other  Disadvantaged Community Status: MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status based on most current version of CalEnviroScreen
 Vulnerable Populations: Seniors (age 65 and older) and Youth (under age 15) based on the American Community Survey
 School proximity (within 0.25 miles) based on the California School Campus Database
 Systemic or Predicted Crashes
Crash Density
Each roadway segment block may be converted into ~ 0.25 mile overlapping or contiguous “corridor” segments to create a consistent unit of measurement and assess the concentration of linear patterns of crashes within a defined distance. The highest scoring (i.e. most fatal and serious injury crashes per mile) “corridor” segments within a street needs to be identified and an appropriate threshold set to determine safety corridor eligibility.

Maintenance The jurisdiction may establish a review and re-evaluation frequency for safety corridors. However, such frequency need not exceed seven years.

November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 261
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised April 1, 2025 Part 2 – Signs

Category Generator
Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Land Use Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors Transit stops
Transit Oriented Developments/Transit Priority Areas
Sidewalk presence
Presence of Crosswalk presence
Pedestrian/Bicyclist Bikeway presence
Infrastructure Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors
Presence of vulnerable groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis such as a road safety audit or formalized planning document such as a local road safety plan
November 7, 2014
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 262
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1,2, &3, as amended for use in California) Table 2B-106(CA). Requirements to determine Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates Revised February 6, 2023 Part 2 – Signs

APPENDIX C
Traffic Radar Certifications
Traffic Radar Equipment Certification
Traffic Radar Operator Certification
Created With Tiny Scanner
Created With Tiny Scanner
Created With Tiny Scanner

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –

1. Tyler Baker of ATD Traffic/NDS Data has successfully completed a Radar Operator course. This was based upon the national standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the California Highway Patrol radar manual, and the radar program of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office. This instructor is Scott Miller, a deputy sheriff since 1995 and a California P.O.S.T. certified Radar and Laser Instructor since 2011.

2. Tyler Baker completed the classroom instruction and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, FCC regulations, the California Vehicle Code and California case law as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Tyler Baker has demonstrated competence in test and set-up of the Radar device, in making accurate visual speed estimations and identifying erroneous reading in field settings.

4. Tyler Baker of ATD Traffic/NDS Data is hereby certified as having completed a course of instruction for the purposes of Radar operation for determining car counts and raw data for traffic and engineering surveys as our lined in sections 627, 21400, the 22350 series and the 40800 series of the California Vehicle Code, Chapter 8 of the former Cal Trans Manual and applicable sections of Chapter 2 of MUTCD issued January 13, 2012. This certification is awarded on the 6th Day of April 2017.

Scott Miller

POST INSTRUCTOR

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT –

1. Tam Truc Nguyen of ATD Traffic/NDS Data has successfully completed a Radar Operator course. This was based upon the national standards as outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the California Highway Patrol radar manual, and the radar program of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office. This instructor is Scott Miller, a deputy sheriff since 1995 and a California P.O.S.T. certified Radar and Laser Instructor since 2011.

2. Tam Truc Nguyen completed the classroom instruction and theory of Radar devices, case law, traffic and engineering surveys, FCC regulations, the California Vehicle Code and California case law as well as the test, set-up, operation and identification of erroneous readings.

3. Tam Truc Nguyen has demonstrated competence in test and set-up of the Radar device, in making accurate visual speed estimations and identifying erroneous reading in field settings.

4. Tam Truc Nguyen of ATD Traffic/NDS Data is hereby certified as having completed a course of instruction for the purposes of Radar operation for determining car counts and raw data for traffic and engineering surveys as our lined in sections 627, 21400, the 22350 series and the 40800 series of the California Vehicle Code, Chapter 8 of the former Cal Trans Manual and applicable sections of Chapter 2 of MUTCD issued January 13, 2012. This certification is awarded on the 6th Day of April 2017.

Scott Miller

POST INSTRUCTOR

APPENDIX D
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Reports
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1472 Artesia Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 46,982 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.59 mi 55 0
54 X 1
53 X X 2
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.44 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 49 X X 2
48 X X X X 4
47 X X X X 4
46 X X X 3 85TH %: 46 mph
45 X X 2
44 X X X X X X 6 50TH %: 39 mph
43 X X 2
42 X X X X X X X X 8 15TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X X X X X X X X 8 AVERAGE SPEED: 40 mph
39 X X X X X X X X 8 P
38 X X X X X X 6 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
37 X X X X 4 C
36 X X X X X X X X 8 E % IN PACE: 65%
35 X X X X X X X 7
34 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 27%
33 X X X X X X 6
32 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X X 2
30 X X 2
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): ESTABLISH 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
105
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:09 10:23
Pace
Artesia Boulevard Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 1.ArtWesNor.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Normandie Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1297 Artesia Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Retail
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes in each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 52,721 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.47 mi 55 0
54 X 1
53 0
52 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 13 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 X X 2 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.72 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X 1
47 X 1
46 X 1 85TH %: 43 mph
45 X X X X X 5
44 X X 2 50TH %: 38 mph
43 X X 2
42 X X 2 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X X X X X 7
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
37 X X X X X 5 A
36 X X X X 4 C % IN PACE: 68%
35 X X X X X X 6 E
34 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 18%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X 7 % UNDER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X 3
29 X X 2
28 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): ESTABLISH 27 0
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:30 11:55
Pace
Artesia Boulevard Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 2.ArtNorVer.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
El Segundo Boulevard to 135th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13102 S Budlong Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways and on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 8,700 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.31 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 0
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 96%
35 X X X X X X X X 8
34 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A % UNDER PACE: 4%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 X X X X 4
26 X X X 3 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:48
Pace
Budlong Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 3.BudEls135.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
135th Street to Rosecrans Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13812 Budlong Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane in each direction with yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways and on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 9,000 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.30 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 X 1
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 98%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % OVER PACE: 1%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 E
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X 5
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
107
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:50 12:35
Pace
Budlong Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 4.Bud135Ros.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Rosecrans Avenue to Redondo Beach Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14803 Budlong Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, on-street parking, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,300 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.70 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.62 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 27 mph
41 X 1
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 X 1
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X X X 6 % IN PACE: 81%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 9%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
32 X X X X X X X 7 A % UNDER PACE: 10%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
29 X X X X X X X 7
28 X X X X X X X 7 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X 7
26 X X X X 4 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 X X X 3
24 X 1
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X 1
21 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Budlong Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:40 12:52
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 5.BudRosRed.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
El Segundo Boulevard to 135th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13012 Crenshaw Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Retail / Industrial / Residential 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Low accident rate, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 33,599 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.16 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X X X 3
47 X X X 3
46 X X X X X X X X 8 P 85TH %: 45 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 A
44 X X X X X X 6 C 50TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 E
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 15TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 AVERAGE SPEED: 43 mph 39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): ESTABLISH 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
109
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:25
Pace
Crenshaw Boulevard Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 6.CreEls135.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
135th Street to Rosecrans Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14002 Crenshaw Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial / Retail
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Low accident rate, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,061 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 11 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 X X X X 4 85TH %: 45 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P
44 X X X X X X X X X 9 A 50TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 E 15TH %: 40 mph 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph 39 X X X X X 5
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): ESTABLISH 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
116
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:32 11:55
Pace
Crenshaw Boulevard Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 7.Cre135Ros.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Rosecrans Avenue to Redondo Beach Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 15231 Crenshaw Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial / Retail
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with combination raised median and 2-way left-turn lane 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 28,335 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.32 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.15 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 38 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 35 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 33 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X X X X X X 7 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A % IN PACE: 97%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 E % OVER PACE: 2% 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
32 X X X X X X X X 8 % UNDER PACE: 2%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X 2
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
115
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
14:45 15:49
Pace
Crenshaw Boulevard Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 8.CreRosRed.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2020 W El Seginda Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 28,833 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 14 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.67 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X X X X X 5
47 X X X X X X X 7
46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 85TH %: 46 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A 50TH %: 44 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 15TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 AVERAGE SPEED: 43 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
El Segundo Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:30 12:43
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 9.ElsCreWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1251 W El Segundo Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 34,500 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 14 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.56 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 X 1 85TH %: 40 mph
45 X X 2
44 X 1 50TH %: 35 mph
43 X X 2
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X X X 6 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X 9
38 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7 P
36 X X X X 4 A % IN PACE: 82%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
34 X X X X X X X X 8 E % OVER PACE: 12%
33 X X X X X X X 7
32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X X X X 8
30 X X X 3
29 X 1
28 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 9:25
Pace
El Segundo Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 10.ElsWesVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Gramercy Place to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/26/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1855 W Gardena Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT continuity of speed
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,072 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 29 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
37 0
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 99%
35 X X X 3
34 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 1%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X 8 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X 3
26 X X 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
12:16 13:23
Pace
Gardena Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 11.GarGraWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1514 W Gardena Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/ School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane in each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Narrow road, multiple driveways, on-street parking, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,545 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.55 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.41 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 28 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 25 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 22 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 25 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 98%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 2%
31 0
30 X X 2
29 X X X X X X 6
28 X X X X X X X X 8 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
23 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X X X X X X X X 10
21 X X X X X X 6 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 X X 2
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 11:00
Pace
Gardena Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 12.GarWesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Budlong Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1305 W Gardena Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential/Diagonal parking on both sides 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,673 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.21 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.45 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 34 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 29 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 X 1
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 98%
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 1%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 A % UNDER PACE: 1% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
28 X X X X X X X X 8 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X 7
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
109
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
13:08 14:50
Pace
Gardena Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 13.GarNorBud.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Budlong Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1129 W Gardena Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,673 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 5.80 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 29 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 26 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 26 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 96%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 4%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X X 4
29 X X X X X X X X X 9
28 X X X X X X X X X 9 P EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
23 X X X X X X X X X 9 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X X X 5
21 X X X 3 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 X 1
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Gardena Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
12:34 13:43
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 14.GarBudVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1100 Magnolia Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with no median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,198 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.43 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 4.35 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
37 0
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 98%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 2%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
28 X X X X X X X X 8 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 X X X X 4 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
103
DATE
Pace
Magnolia Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:43
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 15.MagNorVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Van Ness Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/26/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2616 Manhattan Beach
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian traffic, multiple driveways 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 11,888 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.69 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 35 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 32 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
39 X X X X X X 6
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P % IN PACE: 100%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C % OVER PACE: 0% 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X 7
30 X X X X X X X 7
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
108
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:36
Pace
Manhattan Beach Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 16.ManCreVan.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2475 Marine Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed, multiple driveways, on-street parking, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 19,255 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 22 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.57 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 35 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 32 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 35 mph
39 0
38 X X X X X X X X 8 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C % IN PACE: 100%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 E 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 % UNDER PACE: 0% 31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
109
DATE
Pace
Marine Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
10:15 11:23
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 17.MarCreWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1512 Marine Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian activity, multiple driveways, on-street parking, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,611 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 17 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.40 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 31 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 28 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 25 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 28 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 mph
37 X 1
36 0 % IN PACE: 89%
35 X 1
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 7%
33 X X 2
32 X X X X X X X X 8 ∧ % UNDER PACE: 4%
31 X X X X X X 6
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
29 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X 10
24 X X X X X 5
23 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X 2
21 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 X 1
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
13:02 14:15
Pace
Marine Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 18.MarWesVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
El Segundo Boulevard to 135th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13011 Normandie Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Retail
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed, truck route, multiple driveways, on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 19,636 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 5 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.70 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 X 1
46 X 1 85TH %: 41 mph
45 X X 2
44 X 1 50TH %: 36 mph
43 X X X X X 5
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 31 mph
41 X X 2
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X 9
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph 37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C % OVER PACE: 17%
33 X X X X X X 6 E
32 X X X 3 % UNDER PACE: 6%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9
30 X X X X X X 6
29 X X X 3
28 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
105
DATE
Pace
Normandie Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
13:30 14:10
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 19.NorEls135.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
135th Street to Marine Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14610 Normandie Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian activity, multiple driveways, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 20,131 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 15 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 X X 2
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.02 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 X X 2
48 X X 2
47 X 1
46 X 1 85TH %: 44 mph
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X X X X 4 50TH %: 38 mph
43 X X X 3
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X X X 5
40 X X X X X X X 7 AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
39 X X X X X X 6 P
38 X X X X X X 6 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 C
36 X X X X X X X X 8 E % IN PACE: 59%
35 X X X X 4
34 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 21%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 20%
31 X X X X 4
30 X X X X 4
29 X X X 3
28 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X 1
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 X 1
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:20 11:30
Pace
Normandie Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 20.Nor135Mar.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Marine Avenue to 168th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 15935 Normandie Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian activity, multiple driveways, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21,700 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.05 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.60 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 41 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 38 mph
43 0
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 36 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 % IN PACE: 100%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
104
DATE
Pace
Normandie Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:34 12:49
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 21.NorMar168.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
168th Street to Artesia Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 17100 Normandie Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 26,376 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.41 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 40 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 38 mph
43 0
42 X X X X X X 6 15TH %: 35 mph
41 X X X X X X X 7
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 % IN PACE: 100%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
111
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:23 11:28
Pace
Normandie Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 22.Nor168Art.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Artesia Boulevard to 177th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 17650 Normandie Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed, school zone
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21,739 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.16 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.39 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 41 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 37 mph
43 0
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 15TH %: 35 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X 9
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 % IN PACE: 100% 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
116
DATE
Pace
Normandie Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:16
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 23.NorArt177.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Van Ness Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2611 W Redondo Beach Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 32,440 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.84 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 X 1
46 X 1 85TH %: 40 mph
45 X X 2
44 0 50TH %: 36 mph
43 X 1
42 X X X X 4 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X X X 5
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph
39 X 1
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph 37 X X X X X X 6 A
36 X X X X X X 6 C % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 9%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X X 8 % UNDER PACE: 13%
31 X X X X 4
30 X X X 3
29 X X X X 4
28 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 9:28
Pace
Redondo Beach Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 24.RedCreVan.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Van Ness Avenue to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2038 W Redondo Beach Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 31,494 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 mph
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 34 mph
43 0
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 30 mph
41 X 1
40 X X X 3 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
39 X 1
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph
37 X X X X X X 6
36 X X X X X X X X 8 P % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C % OVER PACE: 8% 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
32 X X X X X X X X X 9 % UNDER PACE: 14%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X X X X X X 9
29 X 1
28 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 X 1
24 X 1
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:34 9:59
Pace
Redondo Beach Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 25.RedVanWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1658 W Redondo Beach Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, on-street parking, continuity of speed, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 31,671 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 12 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 X 1
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.04 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 X X 2
46 0 85TH %: 42 mph
45 X X 2
44 X X X X 4 50TH %: 39 mph
43 X X X X X 5
42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 15TH %: 35 mph
41 X X X X X X X 7 P
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A AVERAGE SPEED: 39 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8
36 X X X X X X X 7 % IN PACE: 80%
35 X X X X X X X 7
34 X X X 3 % OVER PACE: 5%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 15%
31 X X 2
30 0
29 X 1
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:02 9:40
Pace
Redondo Beach Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 26.RedWesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Budlong Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1325 W Redondo Beach Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,805 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.40 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X 1
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 42 mph
45 X X X 3
44 0 50TH %: 39 mph
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 15TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7 E
36 X X X X X X X X X 9 % IN PACE: 84%
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 4%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X 1
30 X 1
29 X X 2
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X 1
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 X 1
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:42 10:19
Pace
Redondo Beach Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 27.RedNorBud.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Budlong Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1120 W Redondo Beach Boulevard
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median/landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,805 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 11 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.96 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 X 1 85TH %: 42 mph
45 0
44 X X X 3 50TH %: 39 mph
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X X X X X X 9 15TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 E
36 X X X X X X X 7 % IN PACE: 85%
35 X X X X X X X 7
34 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 4%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 X X 2
30 X 1
29 0
28 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:21 11:31
Pace
Redondo Beach Boulevard
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 28.RedBudVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Van Ness Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2638 Rosecrans Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS:
60 0 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,034 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.82 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 X X X X X X X 7 P 85TH %: 45 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C 50TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 15TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph 39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): ESTABLISH 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
105
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
12:20 13:37
Pace
Rosecrans Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 29.RosCreVan.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Van Ness Avenue to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2045 Rosecrans Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each dir3ection with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 33,295 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.25 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 P 85TH %: 45 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 A
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C 50TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 15TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph 39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): ESTABLISH 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
106
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
13:45 14:53
Pace
Rosecrans Avenue Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 30.RosVanWes.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1617 W Rosecrans Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, heavy pedestrian traffic, continuity of speed, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 35,678 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 X 1
52 X X 2 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 9 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.69 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 X X 2
48 0
47 X 1
46 X X 2 85TH %: 44 mph
45 X X X 3
44 X X X X X 5 50TH %: 37 mph
43 X X X X X X 6
42 X X X X 4 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X 3
40 X 1 AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X 10
38 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X 10
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P % IN PACE: 67%
35 X X X X X 5 A
34 X X X X X 5 C % OVER PACE: 30%
33 X X X 3 E
32 X X X X X X X X 8 % UNDER PACE: 3%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X X 4
29 X X 2
28 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
11:42 12:22
Pace
Rosecrans Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 31.RosWesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1261 W Rosecrans Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 39,397 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 X 1
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.42 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X 1
47 0
46 X X 2 85TH %: 42 mph
45 X X X 3
44 X X 2 50TH %: 36 mph
43 X X X X 4
42 X X X X X X X 7 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X 9
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
39 0 P
38 X 1 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 C
36 X 1 E % IN PACE: 67%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 % OVER PACE: 13%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X 7 % UNDER PACE: 20%
31 X X X 3
30 X 1
29 X X X X X X 6
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 X X X 3 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Rosecrans Avenue
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:25 12:05
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 32.RosNorVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
El Segundo Boulevard to Rosecrans Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13677 Van Ness Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/ School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian activity, multiple driveways, on-street parking, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 21,278 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 29 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 26 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 26 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 94%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 2%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 4%
31 X X 2
30 X X X X X X X X X 9
29 X X X X X X X X X 9
28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 P
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
23 X X X X X X X X X X 10 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X X X X 6
21 X X X X X X 6 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 X X X 3
19 X 1
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
109
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:36 11:49
Pace
Van Ness Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 33.VanElsRos.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Rosecrans Avenue to Marine Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14512 Van Ness Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian activity, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 17,970 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 5 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.76 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 X X X X X X X X X X 10
26 X X X X X 5 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
106
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:08 10:08
Pace
Van Ness Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 34.VanRosMar.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Marine Avenue to Redondo Beach Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 15503 Van Ness Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy pedestrian activity
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,918 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.61 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.83 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X 5 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 A % UNDER PACE: 0% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 E
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 X X X X X X 6
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
103
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
13:44 14:56
Pace
Van Ness Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 35.VanMarRed.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
El Segundo Boulevard to 135th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13016 Vermont Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with andscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,857 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.02 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X 1
47 X 1
46 0 85TH %: 41 mph
45 X X X 3
44 X X X 3 50TH %: 37 mph
43 X X X X 4
42 X X 2 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X X X X X 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
39 X X X X X 5
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
37 X X X X 4 A
36 X X X 3 C % IN PACE: 74%
35 X X X X X X X 7 E
34 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X X X X X X X 7
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 % UNDER PACE: 12%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X 4
29 0
28 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X 1
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Vermont Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
10:23 11:03
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 36.VerEls135.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
135th Street to Rosecrans Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13800 Vermont Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT On-street parking, bus stops, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 19,832 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 X 1 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.83 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.87 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X X X 3
47 X X X X X X 6
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 85TH %: 46 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X 10
44 X X X X 4 50TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X 7 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A 15TH %: 35 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
40 X X 2 E AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7
36 X X X X X X X 7 % IN PACE: 65%
35 X X 2
34 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 11%
33 0
32 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 24%
31 0
30 X X X 3
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:39 11:18
Pace
Vermont Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 37.Ver135Ros.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Rosecrans Avenue to Redondo Beach Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14714 Vermont Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 3 lanes each direction with landscaped raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT 25 mph when children are present, on-street parking, church, senior center, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 X 1 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,954 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.70 mi 55 0
54 X X 2
53 0
52 X 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 X 1
50 X X X 3 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.31 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 X X X 3
48 X X X X 4
47 X X X X X 5
46 X X X X X X X 7 85TH %: 47 mph
45 X X X X X X 6
44 X X X X X 5 50TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X 3 P
42 X X X X X X 6 A 15TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X X X X X X 8 C
40 X X X X X X 6 E AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph
39 X X X X 4
38 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7
36 X X X X X 5 % IN PACE: 56%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X X 7 % OVER PACE: 19%
33 X X 2
32 X X X X X 5 % UNDER PACE: 26%
31 0
30 X 1
29 X 1
28 X 1 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 45 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 0
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
108
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:15
Pace
Vermont Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 38.VerRosRed.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Redondo Beach Boulevard to 161st Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 15720 S Vermont Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with railroad tracks on landscaped raised median island, parallel parking both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,501 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.59 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.75 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X 1
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 41 mph
45 X X X X X 5
44 X 1 50TH %: 36 mph
43 X X X 3
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 33 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X 9
40 X X X X 4 AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
39 X X 2
38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph
37 X X X X X X X X 8 A
36 X X X X X X X X 8 C % IN PACE: 78%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 % OVER PACE: 15%
33 X X X 3
32 X X X X X X X X 8 % UNDER PACE: 7%
31 X 1
30 X X 2
29 X 1
28 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Vermont Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
9:38 10:10
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 39.VerRed161.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
161st Street to Artesia Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 16616 S Vermont Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 18,105 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.86 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 8 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.70 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X 1
47 X 1
46 0 85TH %: 40 mph
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 35 mph
43 X X 2
42 X X X X X 5 15TH %: 32 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X X X X 5 AVERAGE SPEED: 36 mph
39 X X X X 4
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph 37 X X X X X 5 P
36 X X X X X X X X 8 A % IN PACE: 77%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E % OVER PACE: 12%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9
32 X X X X X X 6 % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X X X 5
29 X X X 3
28 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:15 10:46
Pace
Vermont Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 40.Ver161Art.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Artesia Bouleard to 300' S/O Cassidy Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 17551 Vermont Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 26,659 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.23 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.22 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 X X X 3 85TH %: 44 mph
45 X X X X X 5
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P 50TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 A
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C 15TH %: 40 mph 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph 39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 38 - 47 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
110
DATE
Pace
Vermont Avenue
Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
9:10 10:24
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 41.VerArtCas.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
El Segundo Boulevard to 135th Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 13316 S. Western Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn lane 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT On-street parking, multiple driveways, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 20,525 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.13 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 X X 2
47 X X X X X X X 7
46 X X X X X X X X 8 85TH %: 46 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A 50TH %: 43 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E 15TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 AVERAGE SPEED: 43 mph 39 X X X X X 5
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 39 - 48 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Western Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
10:13 11:20
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 42.WesEls135.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
135th Street to Rosecrans Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14010 S. Western Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn lane 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT On-street parking, multiple driveways, lane drop, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 22,508 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.73 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
46 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 85TH %: 46 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C 50TH %: 44 mph 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 15TH %: 40 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 AVERAGE SPEED: 43 mph 39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 40 - 49 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
105
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:08
Pace
Western Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 43.Wes135Ros.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Rosecrans Avenue to 162nd Street
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 14900 S. Western Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn lane 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT On-street parking, multiple driveways, high accident rate, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 25,943 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.25 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 29 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.23 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 X 1
48 0
47 X X X 3
46 X X X 3 85TH %: 44 mph
45 X X X X X X X 7
44 X X X X X X X 7 50TH %: 41 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A 15TH %: 38 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E AVERAGE SPEED: 41 mph 39 X X X X X X X X 8
38 X X X X X X X X X 9 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
37 X X X X X X 6
36 X X X 3 % IN PACE: 88%
35 X X X X 4
34 X 1 % OVER PACE: 4%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 8%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
Western Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
14:25 15:20
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 44.WesRos162.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
162nd Street to Artesia Boulevard
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 17124 Western Avenue
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Arterial, Truck Route
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with two-way left-turn lane 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 30,830 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 10 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.59 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 X 1
46 0 85TH %: 40 mph
45 X X 2
44 X X 2 50TH %: 37 mph
43 X X 2
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 34 mph
41 X X 2
40 X X X X X X X X 8 AVERAGE SPEED: 37 mph
39 X X X X X X X 7
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 mph 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
36 X X X X X X X X 8 C % IN PACE: 85%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
34 X X X X 4 % OVER PACE: 10%
33 X X X X 4
32 X X X X 4 % UNDER PACE: 5%
31 X X 2
30 X X 2
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X 1
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
11:30 12:10
Pace
Western Avenue Total
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 45.Wes162Art.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Western Avenue to Budlong Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1556 W 130th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with no centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, on-street parking, narrow road 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,200 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.14 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 25 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 20 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 26 mph
39 0
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 mph
37 X 1
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 59%
35 X 1
34 X X 2 % OVER PACE: 23%
33 X X X X X 5
32 X X X X X X 6 % UNDER PACE: 18%
31 X X X X X 5
30 X X X X X X X 7
29 X X X X 4
28 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X 6 P
26 X X X X 4 A RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
24 X X 2 E
23 X X X X X 5 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X X X X X X X 9
21 X X X X X X X X X 9 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 X X X X X 5
19 X X 2
18 X 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 X X X 3 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 X X X X 4
15 X X X 3
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
13:48 15:22
Pace
130th Street
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 46.130WesBud.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Budlong Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1558 W. 132nd Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with no centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,300 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.75 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.66 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 36 mph
45 X 1
44 X 1 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 23 mph
41 0
40 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X 4 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
37 X X 2
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 61%
35 X X X X X X X 7
34 X X X X X 5 % OVER PACE: 16%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X 6 P % UNDER PACE: 23%
31 X X X X X X X 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X 8 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
28 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X 3
26 X X X 3 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 X X 2
24 X X X X X 5
23 X X 2 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X 3
21 X X X 3 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 X X X 3
19 X X X X 4
18 X 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
12:15 13:25
Pace
132nd Street
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 47.132WesBud.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2150 W 135th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline/two-way left-turn median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT On-street parking, residential area, fire station, school area, continuity of speed 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 12,408 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 7 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.77 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.64 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 X X X X 4
46 X X X X X 5 85TH %: 45 mph
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 50TH %: 42 mph
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A 15TH %: 39 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E AVERAGE SPEED: 42 mph 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
38 X X X X X X X X 8 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 mph
37 X X X X X 5
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 96%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 4%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 0
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
114
DATE
Pace
135th Street
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 10:20
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 48.135CreWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/11/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1530 W. 135th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Commercial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 2 lanes each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides on certain segments 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Continuity of speed, on-street parking, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 16,076 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 1.00 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 12 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.02 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 0.66 acc/mvm 49 X X X 3
48 X X 2
47 X X 2
46 X X 2 85TH %: 44 mph
45 X X X X 4
44 X X X 3 50TH %: 38 mph
43 0
42 X X X 3 15TH %: 34 mph
41 X X X X X X X X X X 10
40 X X X X X 5 AVERAGE SPEED: 38 mph
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 mph 37 X X X X X X X 7 C
36 X X X X X X 6 E % IN PACE: 73%
35 X X X X X X 6
34 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 16%
33 X X X 3
32 X X 2 % UNDER PACE: 11%
31 X X X 3
30 0
29 X X 2
28 X X 2 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X 1
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 40 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
135th Street
Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:55 12:50
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 49.135WesVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Van Ness Avenue to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/18/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2010 139th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with two-way left-turn median and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,300 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 32 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 30 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 mph
39 X 1
38 X 1 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
37 X X X X 4
36 X X X X X X X X 8 % IN PACE: 98%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % OVER PACE: 2%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16
29 X X X X X X X X X X 10
28 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
105
DATE
Pace
139th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
12:06 13:55
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 50.139VanWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1636 W. 139th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane in each direction with no centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,700 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.82 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 37 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 34 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 32 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X X X 5 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P % IN PACE: 99%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 A
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 X X X X X X X X X 9
30 X X 2
29 X 1
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
139th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
12:39 14:39
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 51.139WesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Crenshaw Boulevard to Van Ness Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 2571 W. 147th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,500 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.10 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 29 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 P % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X X X X 8 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C % UNDER PACE: 0% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21
29 X X X X X X X X X X 10
28 X X X X 4 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
80 DATE
Pace
147th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:29 13:29
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 52.147CreVan.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Budlong Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1246 W. 155th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial/Medical/Residential 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with no centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,600 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.18 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 32 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 29 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 P % OVER PACE: 0%
33 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
28 X X X X X X X X X 9 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
84 DATE
Pace
155th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
12:54 14:54
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 53.155NorBud.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/26/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1850 W. 158th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial/Residential 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,514 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.55 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 5 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.26 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
37 0
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 98%
35 X X X X 4
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % OVER PACE: 1%
33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P % UNDER PACE: 1% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 9 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 X X 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 X 1
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
106
DATE
Pace
158th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
10:39 12:10
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 54.158WesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1304 W. 161st Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, heavy pedestrian activity, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,315 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.49 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 6 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 2.66 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 30 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 mph
37 0
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 99%
35 X X 2
34 X X X X X X 6 % OVER PACE: 1%
33 X X X X X X X X X X 10
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X 5
26 X X X X X 5 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
103
DATE
Pace
161st Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
10:49 12:28
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 55.161NorVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Gramercy Place to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/27/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1853 W. 162nd Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, heavy pedestrian activity, high accident rate 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,465 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 3.01 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 38 mph
45 0
44 X 1 50TH %: 31 mph
43 0
42 X X 2 15TH %: 26 mph
41 X X X 3
40 X X X X X 5 AVERAGE SPEED: 32 mph
39 X X X 3
38 X X X 3 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 mph
37 X X X X X X X 7
36 X 1 % IN PACE: 65%
35 X X X X X X X X 8 P
34 X X X 3 A % OVER PACE: 14%
33 X X X X X X X 7 C
32 X X X X X X 6 E % UNDER PACE: 21%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X 3 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X 2
26 X X X 3 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 X X 2
24 X X X X 4
23 X X X 3 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 X X X X 4 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
162nd Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
9:00 9:30
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 56.162GraWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/20/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1445 W. 162nd Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial/Residential/School 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with two-way left-turn median and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT School crossings, heavy pedestrian activity 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 5,579 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.98 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 28 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 26 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 26 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 99%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 X X X 3
30 X X X X X X 6
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X X X X X X X 9 P EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 E
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15
23 X X X X X X X X X X 10 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X X X X 6
21 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
162nd Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
11:03 13:03
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 57.162WesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Gramercy Place to Western Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/26/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1858 W. 166th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with double yellow centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveways, high truck activity 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 6,014 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.25 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 33 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 28 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 X 1
36 X X 2 % IN PACE: 98%
35 X 1
34 X X X X X X X X X 9 % OVER PACE: 1%
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A % UNDER PACE: 1%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X 6
26 X 1 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
103
DATE
Pace
166th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
13:30 14:56
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 58.166GraWes.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/19/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1648 W. 166th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Commercial/Industrial/Residential 62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with two-way left-turn median/ double yellow centerline/parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT On-street parking multiple driveways, adjacent to church 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 7,046 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 4 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.56 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 30 mph
43 0
42 X 1 15TH %: 27 mph
41 0
40 X X 2 AVERAGE SPEED: 31 mph
39 0
38 X X 2 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 mph
37 X X X 3
36 X X X X 4 % IN PACE: 83%
35 X X X X X 5
34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 % OVER PACE: 8%
33 X X X X X X 6 P
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A % UNDER PACE: 9%
31 X X X X X 5 C
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
29 X X X X X X 6
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 X X X 3 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 X X 2
24 X X 2
23 X 1 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X 1
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
12:17 12:52
Pace
166th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 59.166WesNor.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025
Normandie Avenue to Berendo Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1258 W. 166th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with railroad tracks on raised median 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Multiple driveway, narrow roadway, on-street parking 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,500 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.40 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 2 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 1.96 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 28 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 25 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 23 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 25 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 X X X 3
29 X X X X X 5
28 X X X X X X X X X 9 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 X X X X X X 6
21 X 1 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
100
DATE
Pace
166th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
13:46 15:46
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 60.166NorBer.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Normandie Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1299 W. 170th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/Park
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with no centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Park, multiple driveways, narrow roadway 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 3,027 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 1 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.91 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 28 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 26 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 24 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 26 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 mph
37 0
36 0 % IN PACE: 100%
35 0
34 0 % OVER PACE: 0%
33 0
32 0 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 0
30 0 P
29 X X X X X X X 7 A
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 25 mph 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
93 DATE
Pace
170th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
13:43 15:43
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 61.170NorVer.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Western Avenue to Normandie Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1512 W. 178th Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Industrial/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane each direction with no centerline and parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT Heavy school and pedestrian activity, narrow roadway, multiple driveways 58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 2,800 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.57 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 0 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.00 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 35 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 33 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 32 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 33 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph
37 0 P
36 X X X X X X 6 A % IN PACE: 100%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 C
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 E % OVER PACE: 0% 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 % UNDER PACE: 0% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): Y 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 30 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
102
DATE
Pace
178th Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY

GRAND TOTAL
12:05 13:35
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 62.178WesNor.xlsx.xls 6/26/2025
Normandie Avenue to Vermont Avenue
75 0
74 0 DATE: 2/25/2025 TIME START TIME STOP:
73 0
72 0
71 0 SURVEY ADDRESS: 1064 W. 182nd Street
70 0
69 0 WEATHER: Clear
68 0
67 0 STREET CLASSIFICATION: Minor Collector
66 0
65 0 ROAD CONDITION: Good
64 0
63 0 ROAD DESCRIPTION: Residential/School
62 0
61 0 ROAD GEOMETRICS: 1 lane EB, 2 lanes WB with double yellow centerline, parallel parking on both sides 60 0
59 0 CONDITIONS NOT School crossing
58 0 READILY APPARENT:
57 0
56 0 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 10,407 vehicles SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.50 mi 55 0
54 0
53 0
52 0 ACCIDENT HISTORY: 3 midblock collisions in 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024) 51 0
50 0 ACCIDENT RATE: 0.79 acc/mvm EXPECTED RATE: 1.07 acc/mvm 49 0
48 0
47 0
46 0 85TH %: 36 mph
45 0
44 0 50TH %: 34 mph
43 0
42 0 15TH %: 32 mph
41 0
40 0 AVERAGE SPEED: 34 mph
39 0
38 0 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 mph
37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A % IN PACE: 100%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 C
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 E % OVER PACE: 0% 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 % UNDER PACE: 0%
31 X X X 3
30 0
29 0
28 0 EXISTING SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph SPEED LIMIT CHANGE (Y/N): N 27 0
26 0 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT: 35 mph
25 0
24 0
23 0 OBSERVED BY: NDS
22 0
21 0 REVIEWED BY: Ruben Perales
20 0
19 0
18 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THE 17 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF GARDENA, CALIFORNIA. 16 0
15 0
102
DATE

GRAND TOTAL
10:30 AM 11:55 AM
Pace
182nd Street Total
EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Vehicles
Speed
(mph)
VEHICLES SURVEYED ROADWAY:

LOCATION:

CITY OF GARDENA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
TRAFFIC No. 2838
Filename: 63.182NorVer.xlsx.xls 6/5/2025

APPENDIX E
Engineering and Traffic Survey Raw Data
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 2
31 2
32 5
33 6
34 7
35 7
36 8
37 4
38 6
39 8
40 8
41 6
42 8
43 2
44 6
45 2
46 3
47 4
48 4
49 2
50 2
51 52
53 2
54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 30 - 54 39 mph 46 mph 33 - 42 68 65% 8% / 9 27% / 28

SPEED PARAMETERS
Artesia Blvd/SR 91 Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:09-10:23
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-001
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 28 3
29 2
30 3
31 5
32 7
33 8
34 6
35 6
36 4
37 5
38 9
39 7
40 9
41 7
42 2
43 2
44 2
45 5
46 1
47 1
48 1
49 50 2
51 52 1
53 54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 26 - 54 37 mph 43 mph 32 - 41 68 68% 14% / 14 18% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Artesia Blvd/SR 91 Bet Normandie Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:30-11:55
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-002
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 3
27 4
28 10
29 12
30 16
31 14
32 10
33 13
34 6
35 8
36 3
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 36 31 mph 34 mph 26 - 35 96 96% 1% / 1 3% / 3

SPEED PARAMETERS
Budlong Ave Bet W El Segundo Blvd & W 135th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:48
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-003
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 5
28 11
29 11
30 20
31 13
32 10
33 12
34 10
35 10
36 3
37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 107 26 - 37 31 mph 34 mph 27 - 36 105 98% 0% / 1 1% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
Budlong Ave Bet W 135th St & W Rosecrans Ave
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:50-12:35
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-004
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 1
22 1
23 24 1
25 3
26 4
27 7
28 7
29 7
30 9
31 13
32 7
33 11
34 9
35 5
36 6
37 3
38 4
39 1
40 41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 21 - 41 31 mph 35 mph 27 - 36 81 81% 10% / 10 9% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
Budlong Ave Bet W Rosecrans Ave & W Redondo Beach Blvd
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:40-12:52
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-005
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 20
41 17
42 13
43 19
44 6
45 20
46 8
47 3
48 3
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 40 - 48 43 mph 45 mph 39 - 48 109 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Crenshaw Blvd Bet W El Segundo Blvd & W 135th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:25
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-006
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 5
40 29
41 14
42 22
43 17
44 9
45 16
46 4
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 116 39 - 46 42 mph 45 mph 37 - 46 116 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Crenshaw Blvd Bet W 135th St & W Rosecrans Ave
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:32-11:55
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-007
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 2
31 5
32 8
33 14
34 19
35 16
36 14
37 14
38 9
39 5
40 7
41 2
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 115 30 - 41 35 mph 38 mph 31 - 40 111 97% 1% / 2 2% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Crenshaw Blvd Bet W Rosecrans Ave & W Redondo Beach Blvd City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:45-15:49
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-008
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 11
40 10
41 10
42 10
43 9
44 15
45 13
46 10
47 7
48 5
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 39 - 48 43 mph 46 mph 39 - 48 100 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W El Segundo Blvd Bet Crenshaw Blvd & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:30-12:43
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-009
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 2
29 1
30 3
31 8
32 10
33 7
34 8
35 15
36 4
37 7
38 8
39 9
40 6
41 3
42 3
43 2
44 1
45 2
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 28 - 46 35 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 82 82% 6% / 6 12% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
W El Segundo Blvd Bet S Western Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:25
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-010
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 2
27 3
28 8
29 12
30 17
31 19
32 13
33 15
34 7
35 3
36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 26 - 36 31 mph 33 mph 26 - 35 99 99% 0% / 0 1% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Gardena Blvd Bet Gramercy Pl & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:16-13:23
2/26/2025
Project #: 25-020011-011
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 2
21 6
22 10
23 11
24 15
25 18
26 12
27 10
28 8
29 6
30 2
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 20 - 30 25 mph 28 mph 20 - 29 98 98% 0% / 0 2% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Gardena Blvd Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-11:00
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-012
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 7
28 8
29 14
30 18
31 12
32 18
33 11
34 9
35 6
36 4
37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 26 - 37 31 mph 34 mph 27 - 36 107 98% 0% / 1 1% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Gardena Blvd Bet Normandie Ave & Budlong Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:08-14:50
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-013
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 1
21 3
22 5
23 9
24 14
25 16
26 13
27 14
28 9
29 9
30 4
31 3
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 20 - 31 26 mph 29 mph 21 - 30 96 96% 1% / 1 3% / 3

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Gardena Blvd Bet Budlong Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:34-13:43
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-014
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 4
27 8
28 8
29 13
30 19
31 14
32 13
33 10
34 7
35 5
36 2
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 26 - 36 30 mph 33 mph 26 - 35 101 98% 0% / 0 2% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Magnolia Ave Bet Normandie Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:43
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-015
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 7
31 7
32 11
33 12
34 17
35 14
36 14
37 11
38 9
39 6
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 108 30 - 39 34 mph 37 mph 30 - 39 108 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Manhattan Beach Blvd Bet Crenshaw Blvd & Van Ness Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:36
2/26/2025
Project #: 25-020011-016
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32 21
33 14
34 16
35 24
36 14
37 12
38 8
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 32 - 38 35 mph 37 mph 29 - 38 109 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Marine Ave Bet Crenshaw Blvd & Van Ness Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:15-11:23
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-017
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 1
20 21 1
22 2
23 3
24 5
25 10
26 11
27 14
28 10
29 10
30 12
31 6
32 8
33 2
34 3
35 1
36 37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 19 - 37 28 mph 31 mph 23 - 32 89 89% 4% / 4 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Marine Ave Bet S Western Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:02-14:15
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-018
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 3
29 3
30 6
31 9
32 3
33 6
34 10
35 8
36 12
37 4
38 14
39 9
40 1
41 2
42 5
43 5
44 1
45 2
46 1
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 28 - 47 36 mph 41 mph 30 - 39 81 77% 5% / 6 18% / 18

SPEED PARAMETERS
Normandie Ave Bet W El Segundo Blvd & W 135th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:30-14:10
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-019
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 26
27 1
28 2
29 3
30 4
31 4
32 5
33 5
34 5
35 4
36 8
37 8
38 6
39 6
40 7
41 5
42 5
43 3
44 4
45 6
46 1
47 1
48 2
49 2
50 51 2
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 24 - 51 37 mph 44 mph 32 - 41 59 59% 15% / 15 26% / 26

SPEED PARAMETERS
Normandie Ave Bet W 135th St & Marine Ave
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:30
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-020
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 13
36 16
37 15
38 19
39 14
40 10
41 14
42 3
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 104 35 - 42 38 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 104 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Normandie Ave Bet Marine Ave & W 168th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:34-12:49
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-021
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 4
35 18
36 13
37 14
38 17
39 15
40 17
41 7
42 6
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 111 34 - 42 38 mph 40 mph 33 - 42 111 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Normandie Ave Bet W 168th St & Artesia Blvd/SR 91
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:23-11:28
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-022
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 2
35 24
36 17
37 17
38 14
39 12
40 10
41 9
42 11
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 116 34 - 42 37 mph 41 mph 33 - 42 116 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Normandie Ave Bet Artesia Blvd & W 177th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:16
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-023
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 1
29 4
30 3
31 4
32 8
33 8
34 9
35 9
36 6
37 6
38 14
39 1
40 12
41 5
42 4
43 1
44 45 2
46 1
47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 47 36 mph 40 mph 32 - 41 78 78% 13% / 13 9% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Redondo Beach Blvd Bet Crenshaw Blvd & Van Ness Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:28
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-024
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 1
26 1
27 8
28 2
29 1
30 9
31 5
32 9
33 10
34 16
35 10
36 8
37 6
38 4
39 1
40 3
41 1
42 3
43 44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 24 - 44 34 mph 37 mph 27 - 36 78 78% 3% / 3 19% / 19

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Redondo Beach Blvd Bet Van Ness Ave & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:34-09:59
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-025
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 31 2
32 4
33 5
34 3
35 7
36 7
37 8
38 10
39 10
40 12
41 7
42 10
43 5
44 4
45 2
46 47 2
48 49
50 51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 29 - 51 39 mph 42 mph 35 - 44 80 80% 15% / 15 5% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Redondo Beach Blvd Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:02-09:40
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-026
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 1
25 26
27 1
28 29 2
30 1
31 1
32 2
33 4
34 4
35 6
36 9
37 7
38 10
39 10
40 15
41 10
42 9
43 4
44 45 3
46 47
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 24 - 48 39 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 84 84% 8% / 8 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Redondo Beach Blvd Bet Normandie Ave & Budlong Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:42-10:19
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-027
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 28 1
29 30 1
31 2
32 2
33 4
34 5
35 7
36 7
37 8
38 9
39 11
40 14
41 11
42 9
43 4
44 3
45 46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 26 - 46 39 mph 42 mph 33 - 42 85 85% 7% / 7 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Redondo Beach Blvd Bet Budlong Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:21-11:31
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-028
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 23
41 16
42 15
43 18
44 11
45 15
46 7
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 40 - 46 42 mph 45 mph 37 - 46 105 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Rosecrans Ave Bet Crenshaw Blvd & Van Ness Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:20-13:37
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-029
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 26
41 14
42 16
43 17
44 15
45 18
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 106 40 - 45 42 mph 45 mph 36 - 45 106 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Rosecrans Ave Bet Van Ness Ave & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:45-14:53
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-030
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 2
30 4
31 3
32 8
33 3
34 5
35 5
36 11
37 10
38 8
39 10
40 1
41 3
42 4
43 6
44 5
45 3
46 2
47 1
48 49 2
50 51
52 2
53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 28 - 53 37 mph 44 mph 30 - 39 67 67% 3% / 3 30% / 30

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Rosecrans Ave S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:42-12:22
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-031
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 3
27 28
29 6
30 1
31 3
32 7
33 8
34 13
35 9
36 1
37 8
38 1
39 40 11
41 9
42 7
43 4
44 2
45 3
46 2
47 48 1
49 50
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 26 - 51 35 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 67 67% 13% / 13 20% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Rosecrans Ave Bet Normandie Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:25-12:05
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-032
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 1
20 3
21 6
22 6
23 10
24 12
25 14
26 12
27 15
28 10
29 9
30 9
31 2
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 109 19 - 31 26 mph 29 mph 21 - 30 103 94% 3% / 4 2% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Van Ness Ave Bet W El Segundo Blvd & W Rosecrans Ave
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:36-11:49
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-033
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 5
27 10
28 14
29 14
30 17
31 17
32 13
33 12
34 4
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 106 26 - 34 30 mph 33 mph 25 - 34 106 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Van Ness Ave Bet W Rosecrans Ave & Marine Ave
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:08-10:08
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-034
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 6
28 16
29 18
30 20
31 21
32 17
33 5
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 27 - 33 30 mph 32 mph 24 - 33 103 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
Van Ness Ave Bet Marine Ave & W Redondo Beach Blvd
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:44-14:56
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-035
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 2
29 30 4
31 5
32 13
33 7
34 6
35 7
36 3
37 4
38 11
39 5
40 12
41 6
42 2
43 4
44 3
45 3
46 47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 27 - 48 37 mph 41 mph 32 - 41 74 74% 12% / 12 14% / 14

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Vermont Ave Bet W 135th St & W El Segundo Blvd
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:23-11:03
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-036
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30 3
31 32 5
33 34 7
35 2
36 7
37 7
38 4
39 2
40 2
41 9
42 11
43 7
44 4
45 10
46 9
47 6
48 3
49 50 1
51 52 1
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 30 - 52 42 mph 46 mph 37 - 46 65 65% 24% / 24 11% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Vermont Ave Bet W Rosecrans Ave & W 135th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:39-11:18
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-037
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: None Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 28 1
29 1
30 1
31 32 5
33 2
34 7
35 5
36 5
37 7
38 8
39 4
40 6
41 8
42 6
43 3
44 5
45 6
46 7
47 5
48 4
49 3
50 3
51 1
52 1
53 54 2
55 56 1
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 108 26 - 56 41 mph 47 mph 37 - 46 60 56% 25% / 28 19% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Vermont Ave Bet W Redondo Beach Blvd & W Rosecrans Ave City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:15
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-038
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 3
29 1
30 2
31 1
32 8
33 3
34 11
35 15
36 8
37 8
38 10
39 2
40 4
41 9
42 5
43 3
44 1
45 5
46 47
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 28 - 48 36 mph 41 mph 32 - 41 78 78% 7% / 7 15% / 15

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Vermont Ave Bet W 161st St/Alondra Blvd & W Redondo Beach Blvd City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:38-10:10
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-039
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27
28 2
29 3
30 5
31 3
32 6
33 9
34 10
35 13
36 8
37 5
38 14
39 4
40 5
41 2
42 5
43 2
44 1
45 46
47 1
48 1
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 48 35 mph 40 mph 30 - 39 77 77% 6% / 6 17% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Vermont Ave Bet Artesia Blvd/SR 91 & W 161st St/Alondra Blvd City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:15-10:46
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-040
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38 4
39 7
40 23
41 18
42 18
43 19
44 13
45 5
46 3
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 110 38 - 46 42 mph 44 mph 37 - 46 110 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Vermont Ave S/O W Cassidy St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:10-10:24
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-041
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 5
40 15
41 10
42 13
43 14
44 15
45 11
46 8
47 7
48 2
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 39 - 48 43 mph 46 mph 39 - 48 100 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Western Ave Bet W El Segundo Blvd & W 135th St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:13-11:20
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-042
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40 17
41 13
42 11
43 10
44 19
45 15
46 9
47 11
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 40 - 47 44 mph 46 mph 38 - 47 105 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Western Ave Bet W 135th St & W Rosecrans Ave
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:08
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-043
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 1
35 4
36 3
37 6
38 9
39 8
40 13
41 12
42 12
43 11
44 7
45 7
46 3
47 3
48 49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 34 - 49 41 mph 44 mph 36 - 45 88 88% 5% / 5 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Western Ave Bet W Rosecrans Ave & W 162nd St
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
14:25-15:20
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-044
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29
30 2
31 2
32 4
33 4
34 4
35 18
36 8
37 14
38 16
39 7
40 8
41 2
42 3
43 2
44 2
45 2
46 47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 27 - 47 37 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 85 85% 3% / 3 12% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
S Western Ave Bet W 162nd St & Artesia Blvd/SR 91
City of Gardena
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:30-12:10
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-045
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 3
16 4
17 3
18 1
19 2
20 5
21 9
22 9
23 5
24 2
25 9
26 4
27 6
28 4
29 4
30 7
31 5
32 6
33 5
34 2
35 1
36 2
37 1
38 1
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 15 - 38 25 mph 32 mph 21 - 30 59 59% 18% / 18 23% / 23

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 130th St Bet S Western Ave & Budlong Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:48-15:22
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-046
0 5 10
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18 1
19 4
20 3
21 3
22 3
23 2
24 5
25 2
26 3
27 3
28 4
29 10
30 8
31 7
32 6
33 8
34 5
35 7
36 2
37 2
38 4
39 3
40 2
41 42 1
43 44 1
45 1
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 18 - 45 30 mph 36 mph 26 - 35 61 61% 23% / 23 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 132nd St Bet S Western Ave & Budlong Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:15-13:25
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-047
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36 1
37 5
38 8
39 12
40 16
41 14
42 12
43 12
44 12
45 13
46 5
47 4
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 114 36 - 47 42 mph 45 mph 37 - 46 109 96% 0% / 1 4% / 4

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 135th St Bet Crenshaw Blvd & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:20
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-048
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 1
28 2
29 2
30 31 3
32 2
33 3
34 6
35 6
36 6
37 7
38 15
39 12
40 5
41 10
42 3
43 44 3
45 4
46 2
47 2
48 2
49 3
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 26 - 49 38 mph 44 mph 33 - 42 73 73% 11% / 11 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 135th St Bet S Western Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:55-12:50
2/11/2025
Project #: 25-020011-049
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 4
29 10
30 16
31 12
32 15
33 9
34 13
35 12
36 8
37 4
38 1
39 1
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 105 28 - 39 32 mph 35 mph 28 - 37 103 98% 0% / 0 2% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
139th St Bet Van Ness Ave & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:06-13:55
2/18/2025
Project #: 25-020011-050
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 1
30 2
31 9
32 15
33 12
34 14
35 16
36 12
37 11
38 5
39 3
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 29 - 39 34 mph 37 mph 30 - 39 99 99% 1% / 1 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
139th St Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:39-14:39
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-051
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 4
29 10
30 21
31 18
32 19
33 8
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 80 28 - 33 31 mph 32 mph 24 - 33 80 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 147th St Bet Crenshaw Blvd & Van Ness Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:29-13:29
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-052
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 9
29 14
30 19
31 18
32 15
33 9
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 84 28 - 33 30 mph 32 mph 24 - 33 84 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 155th St Bet Normandie Ave & Budlong Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:54-14:54
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-053
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 2
27 8
28 9
29 17
30 19
31 11
32 16
33 8
34 10
35 4
36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 106 25 - 36 30 mph 33 mph 26 - 35 104 98% 0% / 1 1% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 158th St Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:39-12:10
2/26/2025
Project #: 25-020011-054
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 5
27 5
28 12
29 18
30 14
31 18
32 12
33 10
34 6
35 2
36 1
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 26 - 36 30 mph 33 mph 26 - 35 102 99% 0% / 0 1% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 161st St Bet Normandie Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:49-12:28
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-055
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 4
22 23 3
24 4
25 2
26 3
27 2
28 3
29 5
30 13
31 12
32 6
33 7
34 3
35 8
36 1
37 7
38 3
39 3
40 5
41 3
42 2
43 44 1
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 21 - 44 31 mph 38 mph 28 - 37 65 65% 18% / 18 17% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 162nd St Bet Gramercy Pl & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:30
2/27/2025
Project #: 25-020011-056
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 1
22 6
23 10
24 15
25 16
26 18
27 11
28 9
29 5
30 6
31 3
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 21 - 31 26 mph 28 mph 22 - 31 99 99% 1% / 1 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 162nd St Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:03-13:03
2/20/2025
Project #: 25-020011-057
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 1
27 6
28 13
29 18
30 14
31 14
32 13
33 11
34 9
35 1
36 2
37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 103 26 - 37 30 mph 33 mph 27 - 36 101 98% 0% / 1 1% / 1

SPEED PARAMETERS
166th St Bet Gramercy Pl & S Western Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:30-14:56
2/26/2025
Project #: 25-020011-058
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 1
24 2
25 2
26 3
27 8
28 19
29 6
30 9
31 5
32 11
33 6
34 10
35 5
36 4
37 3
38 2
39 40 2
41 42 1
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 22 - 42 30 mph 35 mph 27 - 36 83 83% 9% / 9 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
166th St Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:17-12:52
2/19/2025
Project #: 25-020011-059
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 1
22 6
23 14
24 14
25 19
26 13
27 16
28 9
29 5
30 3
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 21 - 30 25 mph 28 mph 21 - 30 100 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
166th St Bet Normandie Ave & Berendo Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:46-15:46
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-060
0 5 10 15 20
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 25 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 17
25 22
26 20
27 14
28 13
29 7
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 93 24 - 29 26 mph 28 mph 20 - 29 93 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 170th St Bet Normandie Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
13:43-15:43
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-061
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 14
32 18
33 21
34 21
35 22
36 6
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 31 - 36 33 mph 35 mph 27 - 36 102 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 178th St Bet S Western Ave & Normandie Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:05-13:35
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-062
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 3
32 14
33 21
34 20
35 20
36 15
37 9
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 102 31 - 37 34 mph 36 mph 28 - 37 102 100% 0% / 0 0% / 0

SPEED PARAMETERS
W 182nd St Bet Normandie Ave & S Vermont Ave
City of Gardena
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:30-11:55
2/25/2025
Project #: 25-020011-063
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
City of Gardena
Gardena City Council
Meeting

AGENDA REPORT

SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9F.

Section: CONSENT

CALENDAR
Meeting Date: August 26,
2025
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Agreement between the City of Lawndale and City of Gardena for the Elderly Nutrition Program Services
COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Approve the Contract Services Agreement between the City of Lawndale and the City of Gardena for the Elderly Nutrition Program Services beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the Contract Services Agreement between the City of Lawndale and the City of Gardena for the Elderly Nutrition Program Services from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026. The City of Gardena has an agreement with Los Angeles County's Aging and Disabilities Department to provide Elderly Nutritional Program services to senior citizens aged 60 and over. The City of Gardena receives federal Older Americans Act funds to provide meal programs at four sites including the Nakaoka Community Center, Rowley Memorial Park, Gardena Senior Day Care Center, and the Harold Hoffman Community Center in Lawndale. This agreement provides the necessary language between the City of Gardena and the City of Lawndale to operate an Elderly Nutrition Program site at the Lawndale property located at 14700 Burin Avenue.

The City of Lawndale will administer the senior meals and the City of Gardena will assure that sufficient food and beverages are delivered to the location.

FISCAL IMPACT/COST:

None
APPROVED:
___________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
Attachments
Lawndale_agreement_2025_-_approved as to form.pdf
Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 Docusign Envelope ID: 0F39A06F-52A6-491B-9234-7E84A87B8F05 City of Gardena
Gardena City Council
Meeting

AGENDA REPORT

SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 9F.

Section: CONSENT

CALENDAR
Meeting Date: August 26,
2025
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE: Approve Amendment to the Agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Staff Recommendation: Approve Amendment
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

At its December 17, 2024 meeting, the Council approved an agreement with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to participate in the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program (ZETCP).

Created through the 2023 passage of SB 125, the ZETCP directs the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) to distribute $1.1 billion in funding—over future continuous appropriations—for zero-emission transit equipment and operations. These funds are allocated to regional transportation planning agencies, such as Metro.

Metro was awarded $320 million to advance its zero-emission bus program. Metro subsequently adopted the Los Angeles County Regional Zero Emission Bus Procurement Policy and Fund Allocation Plan, establishing a formula to distribute ZETCP-equivalent funds to local transit operators, including GTrans. Under this program, GTrans was initially eligible to receive $2,042,965 on a reimbursement basis to support its recent purchase of zero-emission buses, expected to arrive in late summer 2025.

To date, Metro has received $119.5 million in ZETCP funds from the State. During the State’s FY 2026 budget negotiations, future appropriations for the program were at risk but ultimately preserved in the final budget.

However, to safeguard against potential future funding cuts or delays, Metro is seeking to amend its agreements with LA County transit operators. The amendments adjust ZETCP-equivalent allocations to reflect the commensurate amount of funding Metro actually receives from the State, using the Board-approved allocation formula. Under the revised funding levels, the total allocation for all Included and Eligible Operators is $18.58 million, now subject to further adjustment if the State changes Metro’s allocation.

As a result, GTrans’ allocation of $2,042,965 has been reduced to $761,469 (a decrease of $1,281,496). These funds will still be applied towards GTrans' purchase of zero-emission buses. Should the remaining $1,281,496 funds become available at a future time, GTrans will use funding towards its zero-emission infrastructure or future zero-emission bus purchases being implemented at that time, in accordance with the guidelines.

Therefore it is recommended that Council approve the amendment to the agreement with Metro for the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program to reflect the revised allocation amount.

FISCAL IMPACT/COST:

The Amendment to the Agreement for the Zero Emission Transit Capital Program will allocate $761,469 to GTrans in support of its recent zero-emission bus purchase. There is no impact to the General Fund.

APPROVED:
___________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
Attachments
City_of_Gardena_ZETCP_MOU_Amendment.pdf
MOU # MOUZET25GAR1000
1 AMENDMENT
TO

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
TO ALLOCATE PROPOSITION C 40% DISCRETIONARY FUNDS

FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGIONAL ZERO EMISSION TRANSIT

CAPITAL PROGRAM (ZETCP)
RECITAL:

WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“LACMTA”) and City of Gardena (“GRANTEE”) previously entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on October 1, 2024, (the “Existing MOU”).

WHEREAS, the Existing MOU allocated a total of $49.84 million in ZETCP – Equivalent funding to be divided amongst Included and Eligible Transit Operators; WHEREAS, on June 26, 2025, the Board approved the reduction of $49.84 million to $18.5 million in ZETCP – Equivalent funding (Proposition C 40% Discretionary) for Included and Eligible Transit Operators as presented in Exhibit A-1, commensurate with ZETCP fund availability to Metro. The board also delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate any future amendments if further adjustments are made to funding availability; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual term and conditions contained herein, LACMTA and GRANTEE hereby agree as follows:

1. Exhibit A of the Existing MOU is hereby amended by deleting it and replacing it with Exhibit A-1, the REVISED ZETCP-EQUIVALENT FUND ALLOCATIONS, attached hereto.

2. ARTICLE 2.1 of the existing MOU is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

2.1 Attached as Exhibit A-1 is the board approved REVISED ZETCPEQUIVALENT FUND ALLOCATIONS. GRANTEE shall receive seven hundred sixty-one thousand four hundred sixty-nine dollars ($761,469) in FY25 only. GRANTEE agrees that the advanced allocation of funds allows for immediate use. LACMTA shall not be obligated to forward the funds for the ZETCP to GRANTEE until it receives an invoice, and the ZETCP Service Improvement Plan.

3. Except as expressly amended hereby, the existing MOU remains in full force and effect as originally executed. All rights and obligations of the parties under the existing MOU that are not expressly amended by this Amendment remain unchanged.

Docusign Envelope ID: 3AED40DF-CF66-4E90-A7DE-76DB1AE60C77 MOU # MOUZET25GAR1000
2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Memorandum of Understanding to be duly executed as of the dates below with all the formalities required by law.

CITY OF GARDENA LOS ANGELES COUNTY

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY
By:___________________________ By:_____________________________ Tasha Cerda Stephanie Wiggins
Mayor Chief Executive Officer
Date:__________________________ Date:___________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Carmen Vasquez DAWYN R. HARRISON
City Attorney County Counsel
By:___________________________ By:___________________________ Date:_________________________ Date:_________________________ ATTEST:

By:___________________________
Mina Semenza
City Clerk
Date:__________________________
7/16/2025
Digitally signed by: 4dd8a4b6-a104-429a-9907-
9b6d6de7c696
DN: CN = 4dd8a4b6-a104-429a-9907-
9b6d6de7c696
Date: 2025.07.16 15:32:08 -08'00'
Docusign Envelope ID: 3AED40DF-CF66-4E90-A7DE-76DB1AE60C77 8/14/2025
EXHIBIT A-1
Included Operators:
1 Arcadia 0.0803% $ 128,657 $ 47,954
2 Claremont 0.0282% 45,161 16,833
3 Commerce 0.1028% 164,790 61,422
4 Culver City 1.3009% 2,085,360 777,270
5 Foothill Transit 6.1695% 9,889,646 3,686,141
6 Gardena 1.2745% 2,042,965 761,469
7 La Mirada 0.0229% 36,667 13,667
8 Long Beach 5.7494% 9,216,219 3,435,136
9 Montebello 1.9764% 3,168,129 1,180,848
10 Norwalk 0.7545% 1,209,474 450,804
11 Redondo Beach DR 0.0143% 22,932 8,547
12 Redondo Beach MB 0.1796% 287,949 107,327
13 Santa Monica 4.9045% 7,861,768 2,930,295
14 Torrance 1.5116% 2,423,023 903,127
Eligible Operators:
15 Antelope Valley 1.5593% 2,499,459 931,617
16 Santa Clarita 1.2974% 2,079,675 775,152
17 LADOT Local 2.2998% 3,686,505 1,374,061
18 LADOT Express 1.1688% 1,873,488 698,300
19 Foothill BSCP 0.6972% 1,117,544 416,539
20 Total Municipal Operators 31.0917% $ 49,839,411 $ 18,576,508 Note:
(1) Based on FY24 SB1 Allocation Formula.
(2) This represents the total ZETCP allocation for all years of SB125. (3) May be revised based on actual state fund allocation

REVISED ZETCP-EQUIVALENT FUND ALLOCATIONS
Operators SB1 - STA
Allocation (1)
Revised ZETCP
Allocation per State
Budget
Reduction(2)(3)
Original ZETCP
Allocation(2)
Docusign Envelope ID: 3AED40DF-CF66-4E90-A7DE-76DB1AE60C77

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY COMMISSION
Regular PEQC Meeting Notice and Agenda
Website: www.cityofgardena.org
Tuesday, August 19, 2025 – 7:00 PM
Council Chamber at City Hall
1700 W. 162nd Street, Gardena, California
To view the complete Planning and Environmental Quality Commission agenda packet, Click Here

6. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

6.A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #17-24, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #7-24 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #7-24), to allow the operations of private vehicle storage facilities within two existing industrial buildings (totaling 23,334 square feet), located in the General Industrial (M-2) zone, in accordance with Gardena Municipal Code Section 18.46.030.C.9.

Environmental Consideration: The proposed project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 - Existing Facilities), in that it consists of minor alterations of the existing structure in order to operate the requested use.

APPLICANT: Mathew Farah, Westside Collection Car Storage LOCATION: 1608- 1612 W. 139th Street, APN (6102-014-067 and -068).

Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 12-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #7-24, and Environmental Assessment #17-24 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

6.B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #7-25, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2-25 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #2-25), per section

18.32.030.B of the Gardena Municipal Code, to allow the on-site-sale and consumption of beer and wine within a new restaurant located in the General Commercial (C-3) zone.

Environmental Consideration: The project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1- Existing Facilities).

APPLICANT: Vicky's Bubbly Café
LOCATION: 14782 Crenshaw Boulevard, APN (4064-013-021)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 11-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #2-25, and Environmental Assessment #7-25 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

6.C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #2-25, SITE PLAN REVIEW#1-25, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP # 1-25
The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for approval of an Environmental Assessment (EA #2-25); Site Plan Review (SPR #1-25); and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1-25; Tentative Parcel Map No. 84583) to allow for the construction a multifamily residential condominium development consisting of three (3) three-story townhome units (1,684 sf living area per unit, exclusive of a 550 sf garage and 100 sf deck) on a 7,405 sf lot in the Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) zone in accordance with Section 18.44.010.A and Chapter 17.08 of the Garden Municipal Code (GMC).

Environmental Consideration: The proposed project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15303(b) (Class 3 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), in that it consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures.

APPLICANT: Mason Zojaji
LOCATION: 15903 Brighton Avenue, APN (6105-014-017)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 10-25, by vote of 3-1-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Site Plan Review #1-25 and Tentative Parcel Map #1-25, And Environmental Assessment #2-25, determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY COMMISSION
Regular PEQC Meeting Notice and Agenda
Website: www.cityofgardena.org
Tuesday, August 19, 2025 – 7:00 PM
Council Chamber at City Hall
1700 W. 162nd Street, Gardena, California
To view the complete Planning and Environmental Quality Commission agenda packet, Click Here

6. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

6.A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #17-24, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #7-24 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #7-24), to allow the operations of private vehicle storage facilities within two existing industrial buildings (totaling 23,334 square feet), located in the General Industrial (M-2) zone, in accordance with Gardena Municipal Code Section 18.46.030.C.9.

Environmental Consideration: The proposed project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 - Existing Facilities), in that it consists of minor alterations of the existing structure in order to operate the requested use.

APPLICANT: Mathew Farah, Westside Collection Car Storage LOCATION: 1608- 1612 W. 139th Street, APN (6102-014-067 and -068).

Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 12-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #7-24, and Environmental Assessment #17-24 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

6.B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #7-25, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2-25 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #2-25), per section

18.32.030.B of the Gardena Municipal Code, to allow the on-site-sale and consumption of beer and wine within a new restaurant located in the General Commercial (C-3) zone.

Environmental Consideration: The project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1- Existing Facilities).

APPLICANT: Vicky's Bubbly Café
LOCATION: 14782 Crenshaw Boulevard, APN (4064-013-021)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 11-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #2-25, and Environmental Assessment #7-25 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

6.C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #2-25, SITE PLAN REVIEW#1-25, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP # 1-25
The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for approval of an Environmental Assessment (EA #2-25); Site Plan Review (SPR #1-25); and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1-25; Tentative Parcel Map No. 84583) to allow for the construction a multifamily residential condominium development consisting of three (3) three-story townhome units (1,684 sf living area per unit, exclusive of a 550 sf garage and 100 sf deck) on a 7,405 sf lot in the Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) zone in accordance with Section 18.44.010.A and Chapter 17.08 of the Garden Municipal Code (GMC).

Environmental Consideration: The proposed project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15303(b) (Class 3 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), in that it consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures.

APPLICANT: Mason Zojaji
LOCATION: 15903 Brighton Avenue, APN (6105-014-017)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 10-25, by vote of 3-1-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Site Plan Review #1-25 and Tentative Parcel Map #1-25, And Environmental Assessment #2-25, determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY COMMISSION
Regular PEQC Meeting Notice and Agenda
Website: www.cityofgardena.org
Tuesday, August 19, 2025 – 7:00 PM
Council Chamber at City Hall
1700 W. 162nd Street, Gardena, California
To view the complete Planning and Environmental Quality Commission agenda packet, Click Here

6. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

6.A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #17-24, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #7-24 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #7-24), to allow the operations of private vehicle storage facilities within two existing industrial buildings (totaling 23,334 square feet), located in the General Industrial (M-2) zone, in accordance with Gardena Municipal Code Section 18.46.030.C.9.

Environmental Consideration: The proposed project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 - Existing Facilities), in that it consists of minor alterations of the existing structure in order to operate the requested use.

APPLICANT: Mathew Farah, Westside Collection Car Storage LOCATION: 1608- 1612 W. 139th Street, APN (6102-014-067 and -068).

Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 12-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #7-24, and Environmental Assessment #17-24 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

6.B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #7-25, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2-25 The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP #2-25), per section

18.32.030.B of the Gardena Municipal Code, to allow the on-site-sale and consumption of beer and wine within a new restaurant located in the General Commercial (C-3) zone.

Environmental Consideration: The project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1- Existing Facilities).

APPLICANT: Vicky's Bubbly Café
LOCATION: 14782 Crenshaw Boulevard, APN (4064-013-021)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 11-25, by vote of 4-0-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Conditional Use Permit #2-25, and Environmental Assessment #7-25 determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

6.C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #2-25, SITE PLAN REVIEW#1-25, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP # 1-25
The Planning Commission and Environmental Quality Commission reviewed a request for approval of an Environmental Assessment (EA #2-25); Site Plan Review (SPR #1-25); and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM #1-25; Tentative Parcel Map No. 84583) to allow for the construction a multifamily residential condominium development consisting of three (3) three-story townhome units (1,684 sf living area per unit, exclusive of a 550 sf garage and 100 sf deck) on a 7,405 sf lot in the Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-3) zone in accordance with Section 18.44.010.A and Chapter 17.08 of the Garden Municipal Code (GMC).

Environmental Consideration: The proposed project was considered for a categorical exemption from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15303(b) (Class 3 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), in that it consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures.

APPLICANT: Mason Zojaji
LOCATION: 15903 Brighton Avenue, APN (6105-014-017)
Commission Action: The Planning and Environmental Quality Commission approved Resolution No. PC 10-25, by vote of 3-1-0 (with one commissioner absent), approving Site Plan Review #1-25 and Tentative Parcel Map #1-25, And Environmental Assessment #2-25, determined the project exempt and directed staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

City Council Action: Receive and file OR Call for Review (By way of two votes from the City Council).

City of Gardena
Gardena City Council
Meeting

AGENDA REPORT

SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. 14A.

Section: DEPARTMENTAL

ITEMS - COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT
Meeting Date: August 26,
2025
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE GARDENA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 6698 Adopting a Resolution establishing fees for Vacant Property Program Registration and Renewal, as authorized pursuant to Ordinance No. 1882 and finding that the fee resolution is exempt from CEQA under Guidelines Section 15273 and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8).

The adoption of this resolution is statutorily exempt from the requirements of CEQA because these fees are imposed to meet operating expenses through cost recovery for staff wages incurred by the City and the adoption of this resolution falls within the exemptions for local agency decisions specified in Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8) and CEQA Guidelines section 15273.

COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED:

Staff respectfully recommend that the City Council:

1. Open the public hearing;

2. Receive testimony from the public, allowing three (3) minutes for each speaker; and

3. Close the public hearing.

Staff Recommendation for Motion:

1. Approval of Resolution No. 6698.

2. Find that the adoption of the Resolution is exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and

3. Direct staff to file a notice of exemption.

RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF SUMMARY:

On June 10, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1882 to establish the Vacant Property Registry Program, requiring the registration of vacant, abandoned, or foreclosed residences under Chapter 9.72. To support implementation and enforcement, staff conducted a cost analysis and proposed fees consistent with similar programs in other jurisdictions. The $245 registration fee and the $245 annual renewal fee reflect the City’s cost of service, including Code Enforcement labor and a one-time platform fee from a third-party provider.

FISCAL IMPACT/COST:

The registration and renewal fees will be collected through a third-party property registration platform at the time of registration, with $125 retained for data collection fees and the remaining balance remitted to the City.

APPROVED:
___________________________
Clint Osorio, City Manager
Attachments
Staff Report -Vacancy Property Registry Program Registration Fee A - Resolution No. 6698
B - Vacant Property Registry Program Cost Detail
City of Gardena
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item No.: 14A.

Department: Community Development
Meeting Date: August 26, 2025

VACANCY REGISTRY PROGRAM

REGISTRATION FEE

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
AGENDA TITLE:

PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION NO. 6698, Adopting a Resolution establishing fees for Vacant Property Program Registration and Renewal, as authorized pursuant to Ordinance No. 1882 and finding that the fee resolution is exempt from CEQA under Guidelines Section 15273 and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8).

Environmental Consideration: The adoption of this resolution is statutorily exempt from the requirements of CEQA because these fees are imposed to meet operating expenses through cost recovery for staff wages incurred by the City and the adoption of this resolution falls within the exemptions for local agency decisions specified in Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8) and CEQA Guidelines section 15273.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff respectfully recommend that the City Council:
1) Open the public hearing;
2) Receive testimony from the public, allowing three (3) minutes for each speaker; and 3) Close the public hearing.

Staff Recommendation for Motion:
1) Approval of Resolution No. 6698.
2) Find that the adoption of the Resolution is exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and 3) Direct staff to file a notice of exemption.

BACKGROUND:

On June 10, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1882 related to the Vacant Property Registry Program and added Chapter 9.72 to establish the procedure for registering residences within the City that are vacant, abandoned, or in foreclosure.

ORDINANCE SUMMARY:

Staff conducted a cost analysis to determine appropriate fees that would fully recover the City’s costs for implementing and enforcing the program. These fees are also consistent with similar programs in other local jurisdictions, which typically range from $200 to $350.

Page 2 of 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting