Cities Index.
Agenda packet, first session

Glendale City Council
March 1, 2022

Document
Agenda packet, first session
Meeting
March 1, 2022
Body
Glendale City Council
Pages
25
Original file
15.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on glendaleca.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL
(STAFF ACCESS ONLY) COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U- verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live , on YouTube.com/myglendale , and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices using a free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at glendaleca.gov/agendas . Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. DVDs of the proceedings are available for purchase in the City Clerk's Office.

If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (818) 548-2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please specify the language for which you require translation. The exclusive use of City provided interpreters is not required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.

MARCH 1, 2022 AT 6:00 PM
To help slow the transmission of COVID-19, and protect the health and safety of the community, City Council, as well as Board & Commission meetings, will continue to be closed to the public for in-person attendance.

The public is encouraged to watch and participate from the safety of their homes to practice social distancing. Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U-verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live , on YouTube.com/myglendale , and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices using a free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu.

For public comments and questions during the meeting, call (818) 937-8100. Public comments on a specific agenda item will be taken when that agenda item is discussed. 1 TYPED 3/3/2022 2:18:55 PM
03 01 22
CC

REVISED
- Items 1b and 8b were removed

ROLL CALL

1. CLOSED SESSION – 1:00 PM (To Commence at 2:00 PM )
a. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation: Gharibian v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 20STCV06410

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Devine
b. Invocation: Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 1, 2022 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on February 23, 2022 on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, March 8, 2022 b. Proclamation Designating March 2022 as Women’s History Month

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of February 8, 2022 and the Special City Council meeting of February 8, 2022

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS
a. Community Services and Parks, re: Direction Regarding 2022 Fireworks Shows in Glendale

1. Motion providing direction on sponsorship of Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show

2. Resolution of Appropriation to shift $5,000 in Measure S funds from the Montrose Christmas Parade program to the CV Fireworks Show program to sponsor the 2022 CV Fireworks Show

3. Motion providing direction on the City’s 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale

4. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $15,000 for the 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale, by shifting $5,000 in Measure S funds from the Montrose Christmas Parade program and appropriating $10,000 in donations b. Public Works, re: Ordinance amending the Glendale Municipal Code 10.24.020 to lower the posted speed limits on nine roadway segments

1. Ordinance amending Section 10.24.020 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, pertaining to the prima facie speed limits on non-local city streets 2 TYPED 3/3/2022 2:18:55 PM
03 01 22
CC
c. Glendale Water and Power, re: Grayson Repowering Project

1. Motion providing direction regarding development of additional clean energy resources and negotiation of reserves

2. Resolution amending Resolution No. 22-29 to provide direction to staff regarding the phasing and implementation of Alternative 7 (Tesla/ Wartsila Repowering)

9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision. The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. ADJOURNMENT
3 TYPED 3/3/2022 2:18:55 PM
03 01 22
CC
1 02 08 22
CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL
(STAFF ACCESS ONLY) COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
FEBRUARY 8, 2022 AT 6:00 PM
ROLL CALL – All Present

1. CLOSED SESSION – 4:22 p.m.
a. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation: Bagdassar v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 20STCV01045
b. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation: StateFarm11 v.

City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 21GDCV00229
c. Conference with real property negotiators: Property location – Real property generally located at the terminus of New York Avenue near Park Vista Drive, commonly referred to as “Mountain Oaks.” Negotiating parties: F.E. & M. Inc.

Employee’s Defined Contribution Plan Trust dated July 10, 1984. Agency negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, Michael J.

Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Philip Lanzafame, Silvio Lanzas, Jason Bradford and Onnig Bulanikian. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms for the acquisition of property
d. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: F.E. & M. Inc.

Employee’s Defined Contribution Plan Trust dated July 10, 1984 v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. BS16989
City Attorney Mike Garcia indicated that action is not anticipated. Council recessed to Closed Session at 4:23 p.m.

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:22 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a. Flag Salute: Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
b. Invocation: Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the February 8, 2022 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on February 1, 2022 on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, February 15, 2022 Deputy City Manager John Takhtalian provided the preview. b. Black History Month Proclamation
Dr. Gary Shaffer, Director of Library, Arts, and Culture

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
4A
4 of 296
2 02 08 22
CC
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of January 25, 2022 and the Joint City Council and Housing Authority meeting of January 25, 2022 Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Agajanian
Vote as Follows
b. Public Works, re: Consulting Services to Provide Sanitary Sewer Closed- Circuit Television (CCTV) and Condition Assessment and Recommendations

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Downstream Services, Inc. to provide Sanitary Sewer CCTV and Condition Assessment and Recommendations Services for $1,157,246 plus a 15% contingency for $173,587, subject to the approval of the City Attorney
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Agajanian
Vote as Follows
c. City Attorney, re: Consideration of a Resolution to allow the City Council and all City legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely pursuant to the Brown Act as amended by AB 361

1. Resolution 22-21 authorizing the continuance of remote teleconference meetings of the City’s legislative bodies for a period of an additional 30 days in accordance with A.B. 361
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Agajanian
Vote as Follows

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
Council Member Agajanian asked staff to provide a report on appointing a Glendale City Clerk instead of being elected. Kassakhian seconded.

Council Member Brotman asked staff to provide an update on crime trends. Deputy Police Chief Tim Feeley made a brief presentation.

Mayor Devine asked the public to report raised and uneven sidewalks to Public Work for repair.

Council Member Kassakhian asked staff to provide a report on cutting-off traffic into Ethel Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian, Najarian, Devine
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian, Najarian, Devine
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian, Najarian, Devine
None
None
None
5 of 296
3 02 08 22
CC
and neighboring streets. City Manager Roubik Golanian indicated that a memo will be provided to Council.

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)
Mike Mohill
Cathy Jurca
Tony Passarella
Edwin
Malcolm Johnson

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS
a. Glendale Water and Power, re: Agreements for Residential Virtual Power Plant Program with Sunrun, Inc.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Mike Garcia, City Attorney
Christine Godinez, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Mark Young, General Manager of GWP
Presenting:

Chie Valdez, Integrated Resource Planning Administrator Public Comments:

Monica Campagna
Herbert Molano
Greg Astorian
Sam

1. Motion providing direction regarding Virtual Power Plant Program with Sunrun, Inc.

Moved: Agajanian Seconded: Devine
Vote as Follows
b. Glendale Water and Power, re: 2022 Electric Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Mark Young, General Manager of GWP
Craig Kuennen, Assistant General Manager/Business Services Mike Garcia, City Attorney
Presenting:

Tony Georgis, Consultant
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Najarian, Devine
Brotman, Kassakhian
None
None
6 of 296
4 02 08 22
CC
Public Comments:

Kate Unger
Edwin

1. Motion providing direction to staff regarding the 2022 Electric Cost of Service Analysis
Moved: Agajanian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows
c. City Clerk, re: Appropriating funds for the General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, June 7, 2022
Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager

1. A Resolution 22-22 of Appropriation in the amount of $502,533 for the June 7, 2022 General Municipal Election
Moved: Agajanian Seconded: Najarian
Vote as Follows

9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision. The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. ADJOURNMENT – 10:37 p.m.

Moved: Agajanian Seconded: Najarian
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Brotman, Devine
Kassakhian, Najarian
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian, Najarian, Devine
None
None
None
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
7 of 296
02 08 22
SP CC

M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL (STAFF ACCESS ONLY) COUNCIL

CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
FEBRUARY 8, 2022 AT 3:00 PM
The Special Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the Council Chambers, in said City, at 3:04 p.m. on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

January 12, 2022
Date
A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Management Services, re: Consideration of Public Monument & Memorial Plaque Policy
a. Resolution Establishing the Public Monument & Memorial Plaque Policy

2. Community Development, re: Update of the Draft Economic Development Plan a. Note and file the report on the Draft Economic Development plan and provide feedback on priorities and initiatives
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Vrej Agajanian at 5:00 p.m. January 4, 2022 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 p.m. January 4, 2022 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 p.m. January 4, 2022 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 p.m. January 4, 2022 Glendale, CA Upon Paula Devine at 5:00 p.m. January 4, 2022 Glendale, CA Mayor Devine called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m.

ROLL CALL
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, February 8, 2022 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on February 1, 2022 on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

Item 1 is taken off calendar and will come back on March 1st agenda.

1. Management Services, re: Consideration of Public Monument & Memorial Plaque Policy
a. Resolution Establishing the Public Monument & Memorial Plaque Policy 4A
8 of 296
02 08 22
SP CC

2. Community Development, re: Update of the Draft Economic Development Plan Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presenting:

Bradley Calvert, Asst. Director of Community Development Soua Vang, Deputy Director of Community Development/Economic Dev.

Staff Comment:

Phil Lanzafame, Director of Community Development
a. Motion to Note and file the report on the Draft Economic Development plan and provide feedback on priorities and initiatives
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows
ADJOURNMENT – 4:22 p.m.

Moved: Agajanian Seconded: Kassakhian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian, Najarian, Devine
None
None
None
9 of 296
8a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Direction Regarding 2022 Fireworks Shows in Glendale.

1. Motion providing direction on sponsorship of Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show.

2. Resolution of Appropriation to shift $5,000 in Measure S funds from the Montrose Christmas Parade program to the CV Fireworks Show program to sponsor the 2022 CV Fireworks Show.

3. Motion providing direction on the City’s 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale.

4. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $15,000 for the 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale, by shifting $5,000 in Measure S funds from the Montrose Christmas Parade program and appropriating $10,000 in donations.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 1, 2022 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community Services & Parks (CSP) Department is seeking direction from Council on two different fireworks shows in Glendale, sponsorship of the 2022 CV Fireworks Show and hosting a 4th of July Fireworks Show (2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show) in Downtown Glendale. If City Council directs staff to sponsor the 2022 CV Fireworks Show at the same level as previous years, Council would need to appropriate funds for this sponsorship as it was not budgeted in FY 2021-2022. There is currently $10,000 in unspent Measure S funds in the Montrose Christmas Parade program, as the 2021 parade was cancelled due to COVID-19, and the City didn’t issue the sponsorship check to the Montrose Christmas Parade Association, which was approved as part of the FY 2021-2022 budget. Thus, Council can direct staff to appropriate $5,000 from the Montrose Christmas Parade program to the 2022 CV Fireworks Show program.

In addition, staff is seeking direction from Council on whether the City would like to host a 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale on July 4, 2022.

Based on last years’ experience, staff estimates this year’s event would cost 10 of 296
28a
3 1
2 6
approximately $36,000. Caruso has agreed to sponsor the 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks at $10,000, like last year, if the City was to host one in Downtown Glendale, thus the net cost of the event to the City would be $26,000. Should Council direct staff to plan a 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale, an additional $15,000 would need to be appropriated (approximately $21,000 is remaining from last year’s event budget that was carried over into the current fiscal year), for a total event budget of approximately $36,000 for the 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks event.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Community Services & Facilities and Exceptional Customer Service

RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council provide direction on sponsoring the Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show and the City’s 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale and appropriate $5,000 and $15,000, respectively.

BACKGROUND
The 4th of July Fireworks celebration is an annual tradition in the community hosted by Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association (CVFA). The event was historically hosted by the Crescenta Valley Chamber of Commerce (CVCC), however a group of residents, along with members from the CVCC, created the Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association to raise funds and relieve the burden of funding the show. The Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association was created to provide the leadership, resources, time and energy needed in the community to plan a great annual Fireworks event. The mission of the Association is to bring a high quality public fireworks display to the community and provide a safe, affordable and fun option on the 4th of July for all local residents.

This year marks the 15th annual CV Fireworks show. The City began co-sponsoring the event as early as 2007, and has contributed $5,000 annually towards the event, per Council approval. The City increased its contribution to $7,500 in 2019, as a one-time increase. In 2020, due to the surge in Covid-19, the event was not held. In 2021, with Council direction, the City sponsored the event at $5,000.

On May 18, 2021, City Council also appropriated $40,000 for a 4th of July Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale in 2021 (Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show). CSP secured Exposhows, Inc. as the vendor to operate a 20-minute fireworks show. The vendor experienced some delivery and quality issues on July 4th, resulting in a shorter show with smaller fireworks. Staff negotiated a reduced invoice for the event in the amount of $10,000 ($9,500 discounted since the show was not delivered as expected). In addition, Glendale Police Department (GPD) staffing costs were less than anticipated, resulting in a total cost for the 2021 event of $19,006.84, instead of the original $40,000 estimated. 11 of 296
38a
3 1
2 6

ANALYSIS
The CV Fireworks Association has confirmed that they will be planning a 2022 event at Crescenta Valley High School and will make a decision on whether people will be able to attend the event in person or will have to watch the show from their homes or parking lots around Crescenta Valley High School, as the event date approaches, pending LA County protocols on outdoor events. The CV Fireworks Association welcomes any level of sponsorship from the City and will continue to fundraise on their own. They have also reached out to other government offices and local residents for sponsorships, but don’t have confirmed commitments at the time of writing this report.

Staff anticipates the cost of the 2022 Jewel City Sparkles event in downtown Glendale will be approximately $36,000. Staff recommends a reduction in the event budgeted from $40,000 to $36,000, due to actual costs realized in 2021. GPD staffing costs were not as high as anticipated. It is recommended that there is a $5,368 contingency for any unforeseen costs associated with the event. These may include, but are not limited to:
power washing the parking lot if it is scarred by the detonation of the fireworks, or street cleaning costs if debris falls onto the streets. The total budget includes the full cost of 20- minute show, GPD overtime costs, Fire Permits, Parks Staff, and a contingency for unforeseen costs. Staff desires to contract with a different fireworks vendor than in 2021, due to the issues experienced last year. Council had appropriated $40,000 in Measure S funds for the 2021 show in the FY 2020-2021 budget. The remaining budget of approximately $21,000 from FY 2020-2021 was carried over into FY 2021-2022, thus it can be combined with the new appropriation of $15,000, for a total budget of approximately $36,000 for the 2022 event. At this time, staff is seeking direction from Council on holding the 2022 Jewels City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale.

Fireworks (approximately 20-minute
Fireworks Show)
$ 20,000
GPD (all staff costs are overtime, due
to the holiday)
$ 6,000
Parks Staff (some overtime, some
straight pay, depending on staff)
$ 2,000
Fire (all costs are included in the Fire
Permit for the event)
$ 2,625
Contingency (reserved for unforeseen
costs associated with the event)
$ 5,368
If directed to have the event, the 2022 show will include street closures, appropriate fire permits, and approximately twenty (20) minutes of fireworks on July 4th at 9:00 p.m. Staff is not planning on any accompanied events or activities. The location of the event will be the same as in 2021, at the Market Place parking lot located at 120 Artsakh Ave. 12 of 296
48a
3 1
2 6

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Should Council direct staff to plan an event in Downtown Glendale this year, staff will prepare flyers and notify the public. If Council approves the sponsorship of the CV Fireworks Show, the City logo will be included in all advertising materials when outreaching to the public for the event.

FISCAL IMPACT
The 2022 CV Fireworks Association sponsorship of $5,000 was not included as a part of the FY 2021-22 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $5,000 by shifting appropriation from the Montrose Christmas Parade program. The appropriation request is outlined on the next page:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source
$5,000 43110-1010-CSP-3011-
P8018
43110-1010-CSP-3011-
P5002
Measure S
The 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show will cost approximately $36,000 (rounded up), of which approximately $21,000 (rounded up) is remaining from last year’s event budget that was carried over into FY 2021-22. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of an additional $15,000, $10,000 in donations and $5,000 by shifting appropriation from the Montrose Christmas Parade program. The appropriation request is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$20,993 43110-1010-CSP-3011-P5203-T0000-
F0000-0000-0000
Measure S
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source
$10,000 38500-1010-CSP-3108-
P5203
43110-1010-CSP-3108-
P5203
General Fund-
Donations
$5,000 43110-1010-CSP-3011-
P8018
43110-1010-CSP-3011-
P5203
Measure S

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15304, the proposed firework shows are categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review as a Class 4 Existing Facilities project (Minor Alternations to Land) that entails minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not 13 of 296
58a
3 1
2 6
involve the removal of healthy, mature, or scenic trees. The firework shows would not call for the removal of any trees, and would necessitate nothing more than minor temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative #1: Direct staff to co-sponsor the Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show and appropriate $5,000 for the sponsorship; and direct staff to plan a 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale and appropriate $15,000 for the event.

Alternative #2: Direct staff to only co-sponsor the Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show and appropriate $5,000 for the sponsorship.

Alternative #3: Direct staff to only plan a 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale and appropriate $15,000 for the event.

Alternative #4: Direct staff to only co-sponsor the Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show at any other amount.

Alternative #5: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Gabrielle Goglia, Senior Community Services Supervisor
Tereza Aleksanian, Deputy Director of Community Services & Parks Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
14 of 296
C:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\GLENDALE\TEMP\CC_03012022_MOTION_8A1.PDF MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that as a result of the discussion at the March 1, 2022 City Council meeting regarding sponsorship of the Crescenta Valley Fireworks Association’s 2022 CV Fireworks Show for the Fourth of July, and based on the background provided in the Director of Community Services and Park’s March 1, 2022 Report to the City Council, the City Council hereby directs staff as follows:

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
15 of 296
RESOLUTION NO. ___________

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

MAKING AN APPROPRIATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1: That the sum of $15,000 is hereby appropriated and/or transferred from the following accounts to the following accounts:

ACCOUNTS DESCRIPTION FROM TO
38500-1010-CSP-3108-P5203-
T0000-F0000-0000-0000
43110-1010-CSP-3108-P5203-
T0000-F0000-0000-0000
43110-1010-CSP-3011-P8018-
T0000-F0000-0000-0000
43110-1010-CSP-3011-P5203-
T0000-F0000-0000-0000
Donations and Contributions, General Fund,
Community Services & Parks, Special Events,
City Fireworks Show
Contractual Services, General Fund,
Community Services & Parks, Special Events,
City Fireworks Show
Contractual Services, General Fund,
Community Services & Parks, Measure S CSP,
Measure S Montrose Christmas Parade
Contractual Services, General Fund,
Community Services & Parks, Measure S CSP,
City Fireworks Show
$10,000

$5,000
$10,000
$5,000
To appropriate funding for the City’s 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show in Downtown Glendale.

SECTION 2: The Director of Finance / Information Technology is authorized to make such other revisions, individual appropriation line-items, changes in summaries, fund totals, grand totals, and other portions of the budget document as necessary to reflect and implement the changes specified in this resolution.

SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Adopted this________day of _______________, 2022.
_______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
02/17/2022
_____________________________________
City Clerk 15,000
/
Director of Finance / Information Technology
16 of 296

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Aram Adjemian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No._________was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the__________ day of _______________, 2022, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
17 of 296
C:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\GLENDALE\TEMP\CC_03012022_MOTION_8A3.PDF MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that as a result of the discussion at the March 1, 2022 City Council meeting regarding staff’s planning a 2022 Jewel City Sparkles Fireworks Show for the Fourth of July, and based on the background provided in the Director of Community Services and Park’s March 1, 2022 Report to the City Council, the City Council hereby directs staff as follows:

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
18 of 296
RESOLUTION NO. ___________

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

MAKING AN APPROPRIATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1: That the sum of $5,000 is hereby appropriated and/or transferred from the following accounts to the following accounts:

ACCOUNTS DESCRIPTION FROM TO
43110-1010-CSP-3011-P8018-
T0000-F0000-0000-0000
43110-1010-CSP-3011-P5002-
T0000-F0000-0000-0000
Contractual Services, General Fund,
Community Services & Parks, Measure S CSP,
Measure S Montrose Christmas Parade
Contractual Services, General Fund,
Community Services & Parks, Measure S CSP,
CV Fireworks
$5,000
$5,000
To appropriate funding for the sponsorship of the 2022 CV Fireworks Show.

SECTION 2: The Director of Finance / Information Technology is authorized to make such other revisions, individual appropriation line-items, changes in summaries, fund totals, grand totals, and other portions of the budget document as necessary to reflect and implement the changes specified in this resolution.

SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

Adopted this________day of _______________, 2022.
_______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
02/17/2022______
____________________________________
City Clerk 5,000

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Aram Adjemian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No._________was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the__________ day of _______________, 2022, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
/
Director of Finance / Information Technology
19 of 296
8b

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Ordinance amending the Glendale Municipal Code 10.24.020 to lower the posted speed limits on nine roadway segments.

1. Ordinance amending Section 10.24.020 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, pertaining to the prima facie speed limits on non-local city streets.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 1, 2022 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report and the accompanying ordinance is being presented to the City Council for adoption in order to lower the posted speed limit on nine roadway segments based on the revised 2020/2021 Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS). An amendment to Glendale Municipal Code Section 10.24.020 is required to enforce the new speed limits. 20 of 296
28b
3 1
6 0

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Safe & Healthy Community: Properly set speed limits provide a safe, consistent, and reasonable speed to protect drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists along the roadway.

Speed limits are put in place to notify drivers to the maximum speed that they are permitted to travel on the roadway. Speed limits are designed to enhance safety by reducing the risks created by drivers selecting the speed they wish to drive.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests City Council adopt an Ordinance amending Glendale Municipal Code Section 10.24.020 to decrease the posted speed limit on the following roadway segments, as shown in the Table below.

Street From To
Existing
Prima Facie
Speed Limit
Proposed
Prima Facie
Speed Limit

1. Broadway Central Av. Glendale Av. 35 30

2. Broadway Glendale Av. Wilson Av. 35 30

3. Chevy Chase Dr. Acacia Av. Glenoaks Blvd. 35 30

4. Chevy Chase Dr. Leith Rd. Charing Cross Rd. 30 25

5. Concord St. Broadway Doran St 30 25

6. Lowell Av. Foothill Blvd. Santa Carlotta St. 30 25

7. Montrose Av. Raymond Av. Ramsdell Av. 35 30

8. Ocean View Blvd. Verdugo Rd. North City Limits 35 30

9. Verdugo Rd. La Crescenta Av. Honolulu Av. 40 35
* 10. Fairmont Av. Concord St. 134 FWY Ramps 30 30
* 11. Fairmont Av. Flower St. 134 FWY Ramps 35 35
* 12. Maginn Dr. Pacific Av. Maginn Pl. 25 25
*Locations 10, 11, and 12 were previously surveyed in 2013 and 2015 and inadvertently not updated in the last ordinance amendment for Glendale Municipal Code 10.24.020.

BACKGROUND
Speed limits are set in accordance to the guidelines outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).

An E&TS is required to set and enforce the legal speed limit on roads where the prima facie speed may not apply, typically on streets wider than 40 feet.

The E&TS measures prevailing vehicular speeds and establishes the speed limit at or near the 85 th percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent.

The CAMUTCD specifies that when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

However, it does allow for two options as described below:
21 of 296
38b
3 1
6 0

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sections 627 and 22358.5. This allowance is for safety-related factors such as accident data, highway, traffic and roadway conditions that are not readily apparent to drivers, residential density, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b). These could apply in cases where there is not a direct nexus to pedestrian or motorist safety related concerns, but there are other concerns such as equestrian safety.

As specified in CVC Section 40802, prima facie speed limits are provided by this code or by local ordinance. City of Glendale Municipal Code 10.24.020 provides ordinances:

Ord. 5367 § 1, 2003; Ord. 5298, 2001; and prior code §§ 27-64—67-70 that define the prima facie speed limits set by local ordinance within City of Glendale. The city is required to conduct E&TS every seven or up to fourteen years, depending on changes in roadway or traffic conditions, land use, roadway width, or traffic volume. Any changes in speed limits require an amendment to the respective local ordinance(s) outlined above.

A typical E&TS is shown in Exhibit A. The survey shows recorded speed data, historical collision data, and traffic volume. It may also include roadway configuration and conditions that may affect the traffic speed or safety.

ANALYSIS
There are 95 roadway segments in the City of Glendale that require E&TS for speed enforcement. 63 E&TS were scheduled to lapse in 2020 and were surveyed to confirm that the existing speed limits were in conformance with the CVC, CAMUTCD and existing local ordinance. The majority of the E&TS remained the same 85th percentile speed as previous surveys; however, the 85 th percentile speed on nine streets were lower than the previous E&TS and must be amended by ordinance to allow speed enforcement by radar or laser.

In addition, three street segments that were previously surveyed in 2013 and 2015, and inadvertently not updated in the last ordinance amendment, has also been included in this ordinance amendment.

The proposed ordinance shows roadway segments that are recommended to be changed based on the latest E&TS studies. Those roadway segments are:

1. Broadway between Central Ave and Glendale Ave. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.

2. Broadway between Glendale Ave and Wilson Ave. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.
22 of 296
48b
3 1
6 0

3. Chevy Chase Dr between Acacia Ave and Glenoaks Blvd. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.

4. Chevy Chase Dr between Leith Rd (W) and Charing Cross Rd. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph.

5. Concord St between Broadway and Doran. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph.

6. Lowell Ave, between Foothill Blvd and Santa Carlotta St. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 30 mph to 25 mph.

7. Montrose Ave between Raymond Ave and Ramsdell Ave. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.

8. Oceanview Blvd between Verdugo Rd and N City Limits. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph.

9.Verdugo Rd between La Crescenta Ave and Honolulu Ave. The new E&TS changes the speed limit from 40 mph to 35 mph.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
On October 25, 2021, the Glendale Transportation and Parking Commission (TPC) had a public meeting to discuss the proposed posted speed limit changes. There was no public opposition and the TPC approved a motion recommending the City Council to adopt an ordinance amending Glendale Municipal Code Section 10.24.020, as shown on Exhibit B.

The Public Works Department will coordinate with the Glendale Police Department – Traffic Bureau for the proposed posted speed limit changes.

FISCAL IMPACT
There will be a one-time estimated cost of $6,000 to purchase and install 38 new speed limit signs, which was approved as a part of the FY 2021-22 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$6,000 43110-1010-PWD-7517 General Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed actions are exempt from environmental review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements. 23 of 296
58b
3 1
6 0

ALTERNATIVES

1. The Council may introduce and subsequently adopt the ordinance amending Glendale Municipal Code Section 10.24.020 related to prima facie speed limits on non-local city streets.

2. The Council may choose not to introduce and adopt the ordinance.

3. The Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. Doing so, however, would delay speed enforcement on street segment.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Tommy Chow, Traffic Engineering Associate
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A – Typical Engineering and Traffic Survey Example Exhibit B – October 25, 2021 Transportation & Parking Commission Motion 24 of 296
5 3
0 0
ORDINANCE NO. _________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, BY AMENDING SECTION 10.24.020 PERTAINING TO THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON NON-LOCAL CITY STREETS.

WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, provides standards and statutes for Vehicle and Traffic regulations within the City of Glendale; WHEREAS, such standards include prima facie speed limits on non-local city streets under section 10.24.020;
WHEREAS, based on the standards of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the California Vehicle Code, a number of street segments within the City of Glendale are candidates for changes in their prima facie speed limits based on recent Engineering and Traffic Surveys;
WHEREAS, the changes in this ordinance are consistent with those goals and in the best interest of the City of Glendale;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council finds that all of the facts, findings, and conclusions set forth above in this Ordinance are true and correct and hereby incorporate them by this reference.

SECTION 2. Section 10.24.020 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:

10.24.020 Prima facie speed limits on non-local city streets.

A. It is determined that upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed limit greater than twenty-five (25) miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon the following non- local city streets, other than state highways, which streets would otherwise be subject to a prima facie speed limit permitted by state law of twenty-five (25) miles per hour and maximum speed limit of sixty-five (65) miles per hour. Upon the erection of appropriate signs giving notice thereof on streets or parts of streets, the prima facie speed limits shall be as set forth herein. This section does not apply to any twenty-five (25) mile per hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. 25 of 296
5 3
0 0
Street From To Prima Facie
Speed Limit

1. Arden Avenue Pacific Ave. Central Ave. 30

2. Boston Avenue Foothill Blvd. Markridge Rd. 30

3. Brand Blvd. Glenoaks Blvd. Kenneth Rd. 30

4. Broadway San Fernando Rd. Central Ave. 35

5. Broadway Central Ave. Glendale Ave. 3530

6. Broadway Glendale Ave. Wilson Ave. 3530

7. Camino San Rafael Foxkirk Rd. Calle Canto 30

8. Camino San Rafael Calle Canto North City Limit 40

9. Canada Boulevard Verdugo Rd. Menlo Dr. 35

10. Central Ave. San Fernando Rd. Colorado St. 35

11. Central Ave. Colorado St. Glenoaks Blvd. 35

12. Central Ave. Glenoaks Blvd. Loraine St. 30

13. Central Ave. Loraine St. Kenneth Rd. 30

14. Chevy Chase Dr. West City Limits Glendale Ave. 35

15. Chevy Chase Dr. Glendale Ave. Acacia Ave. 35

16. Chevy Chase Dr. Acacia Ave. Glenoaks Blvd. 3530

17. Chevy Chase Dr. Glenoaks Blvd. Leith Rd. 30

18. Chevy Chase Dr. Leith Rd. Charing Cross Rd. 3025

19. Colorado St. Westerly City Limit Glendale Ave. 35

20. Colorado St. Glendale Ave. East City Limit 35

21. Columbus Ave. Colorado St. Broadway 35

22. Concord St. Broadway Doran St. 3025

23. Concord St. Doran St. Glenoaks Blvd. 30

24. Dunsmore Ave. Foothill Blvd. Markridge Rd. 30

25. Fern Lane Verdugo Rd. Easterly City Limit 30

26. Flower St. Air Way Allen Ave. 30

27. Foothill Blvd. Lowell Ave. Pennsylvania Ave. 40

28. Glendale Ave. San Fernando Rd. Chevy Chase Dr. 30

29. Glendale Ave. Chevy Chase Dr. Colorado St. 30

30. Glendale Ave. Colorado St. Monterey Rd. 30

31. Glendale Ave. Monterey Rd. Verdugo Rd. 35
26 of 296
5 3
0 0
Street From To Prima Facie
Speed Limit

32. Glenoaks Blvd. Alameda Ave. Highland Ave. 40

33. Glenoaks Blvd. Highland Ave. Pacific Ave. 40

34. Glenoaks Blvd. Pacific Ave. Brand Blvd. 40

35. Glenoaks Blvd. Brand Blvd. Geneva St. 35

36. Glenoaks Blvd. Avonoak Terrace Chevy Chase Dr. 30

37. Glenoaks Blvd. Chevy Chase Dr. Scholl Dr. 30

38. Glenoaks Blvd. Scholl Dr. Sleepy Hollow Dr. 30

39. Harvey Dr. Broadway Chevy Chase Dr. 35

40. Highland Ave. San Fernando Rd. Glenoaks Blvd. 30

41. Highland Ave. Glenoaks Blvd. Glenwood Rd. 30

42. Honolulu Ave. Las Palmas Ave. La Crescenta Ave. 35

43. Honolulu Ave. La Crescenta Ave. Pennsylvania Ave. 35

44. Honolulu Ave. Pennsylvania Ave. Boston Ave. 35

45. Honolulu Ave. Boston Ave. Lowell Ave. 35

46. La Crescenta Ave. Verdugo Rd. Shirlyjean St. 40

47. La Crescenta Ave. Shirlyjean St. Montrose Ave. 40

48. Los Feliz Rd. Westerly City Limit Glendale Ave. 35

49. Lowell Ave. 210 Freeway Foothill Blvd. 30

50. Lowell Ave. Foothill Blvd. Santa Carlotta St. 3025

51. Montrose Ave. Raymond Ave. Ramsdell Ave. 3530

52. Mountain St. Verdugo Rd. 2 Fwy 35

53. New York Ave. Foothill Blvd. Santa Carlotta St. 30

54. Ocean View Blvd. Verdugo Rd. North City Limit 3530

55. Pacific Ave. San Fernando Rd. Colorado St. 30

56. Pacific Ave. Colorado St. Glenoaks Blvd. 30

57. Pennsylvania Ave. Honolulu Ave. 210 Fwy 35

58. Pennsylvania Ave. 210 Fwy Foothill Blvd. 35

59. Pennsylvania Ave. Foothill Blvd. Markridge Rd. 35

60. Riverside Dr. Westerly City Limit Southerly City Limit 35

61. Royal Blvd. Mountain Ave. Arboles Dr. 30

62. San Fernando Rd. Spazier Ave. Grandview Ave. 35

63. San Fernando Rd. Grandview Ave. Goodwin Ave. 35
27 of 296
5 3
0 0
Street From To Prima Facie
Speed Limit

64. San Fernando Rd. Goodwin Ave. Rosslyn St. 35

65. Santa Carlotta St. Lowell Ave. Maryland Ave. 30

66. Sonora Ave. Garden St. Lake St. 35

67. Sonora Ave. Lake St. San Fernando Rd. 35

68. Verdugo Blvd. Verdugo Rd. Easterly City Limit 35

69. Verdugo Rd. Glendale Blvd. Mountain St. 40

70. Verdugo Rd. Mountain St. Canada Blvd. 40

71. Verdugo Rd. Canada Blvd. (South) Menlo Dr. 35

72. Verdugo Rd. Menlo Dr. La Crescenta Ave. 40

73. Verdugo Rd. La Crescenta Ave. Honolulu Ave. 4035

74. Verdugo Rd. Hilda Ave. Colorado St. 35

75. Verdugo Rd. Colorado St. Chevy Chase Dr. 35

76. Verdugo Rd. Chevy Chase Dr. Glendale Blvd. 35

77. Victory Blvd. Westerly City Limit Southerly City Limit 35

78. Western Ave. Lake St. Glenoaks Blvd. 35

79. Western Ave. Southerly City Limit Lake St. 30

80. Wilson Ave. Central Ave. Glendale Ave. 30

81. Wilson Ave. Glendale Ave. Broadway 30

82. Fairmont Ave. Concord St. 134 FWY Ramps 30

83. Fairmont Ave. Flower St. 134 FWY Ramps 35
B. The prima facie speed limits for the following non-local city streets are hereby continued at twenty-five (25) miles per hour.

Street From To Prima Facie
Speed Limit

1. Brand Blvd. Southerly City Limit Colorado St. 25

2. Brand Blvd. Colorado St. Broadway 25

3. Brand Blvd. Broadway Milford St. 25

4. Brand Blvd. Milford St. Glenoaks Blvd. 25

5. Glenoaks Blvd. Rossmoyne Ave. Glendale Ave. 25

6. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale Ave. Avonoak Terrace 25

7. Glenwood Rd. Grandview Ave. School St. 25
28 of 296
5 3
0 0

8. Grandview Ave. Flower St. Glenoaks Blvd. 25

9. Honolulu Ave. Orangedale Ave. Verdugo Rd. 25

10. Pacific Ave. Glenoaks Blvd. Stocker St. 25

11. Pacific Ave. Stocker St. Kenneth Rd. 25

12. Maginn Dr. Pacific Ave. Maginn Pl. 25

SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from its adoption at which time the declared prima facie or maximum speed limits set forth herein shall be effective upon erection of appropriate signs giving notice thereof.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2022.
__________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, ARAM ADJEMIAN, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ______ was passed by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ____ day of ________, 2022, and that the same was passed by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
29 of 296
5 3
0 0
City Clerk
30 of 296
31 of 296

32 of 296

8c

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Grayson Repowering Project

1. Motion providing direction regarding development of additional clean energy resources and negotiation of reserves

2. Resolution amending Resolution No. 22-29 to provide direction to staff regarding the phasing and implementation of Alternative 7 (Tesla/ Wartsila Repowering)

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 1, 2022 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On February 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-28 certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Grayson Repowering Project and making Certain Findings and Determinations; and adopted Resolution No. 22-29 approving Grayson Repowering Project Alternative 7 (Tesla/ Wartsila Project Alternative), adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and making findings in support thereof, adopting a Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program, and directing staff to take actions in furtherance thereof (). In clause 5 of Resolution No. 22-29 approving Alternative 7, the City Council directed staff to proceed as follows:
a) Issue bids for electric revenue bonds for the Tesla/ Wartsila Project Alternative, prepare bond documentation, and seek City Council adoption of a bond ordinance;
b) Complete negotiations for Final Notice to Proceed contracts with Tesla and Wartsila, and (following Council approval of contracts), issue a Final Notice to Proceed to Tesla and Wartsila to proceed with engineering and procurement for the Tesla and Wartsila power islands, and to proceed with construction once demolition work is completed;
c) Complete bidding process for Separation of Unit 9 from the Grayson Power Plant and (following City Council award of contract) enter into a contract for the same; d) Complete bidding process for the demolition of the Grayson Power Plant and following award by City Council, enter into a contract for the demolition contract; e) Prepare and release a Request for Proposal for the Balance of Site Procurement, and Construction contract for the work and costs to integrated the Tesla and Wartsila power islands into the Grayson power plant site; 33 of 296
28c
3 1
7 0
f) Finalize the negotiation of contracts for the purchase of emissions reduction credits for the Tesla/ Wartsila Project Alternative and present the same to the City Council for approval; and
g) Release a Request for Proposal for the demolition/ construction phase Owner’s Engineer.

On February 15, 2022, Councilmembers Najarian and Brotman requested that staff return to Council on March 1, 2022 in order for the City Council to consider Councilmember Brotman’s proposal regarding a “modified Alternative 7” that would revise the sequencing for Alternative 7 and defer the decision on purchasing Wartsila internal combustion engines to the end of 2022. In his proposal (referred to in this report as the “Modified Alternative 7 Proposal”) Councilmember Brotman recommended that the City proceed immediately with demolition, environmental remediation, and site preparation at the Grayson Repowering Plant site in a way that allows the City to easily add Wartsila engines later on; that the City proceed with installing the Tesla, Inc. battery energy storage system (BESS) and the switching station; proceed with obtaining South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permits for all five Wartsila engines along with Emissions Reductions Credits for all five Wartsila engines, but delay a decision on whether or not to purchase Wartsila engines (and how many engines) until the end of 2022.

The Modified Alternative 7 Proposal includes direction to City staff to: work with Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) to either purchase additional reserves, or re-define Glendale’s reserve obligations; work on procuring up to 50 MW of additional distributed energy resources (DER) including City-sited solar and storage; commercial and industrial solar and storage; more demand response with incentives and pricing, including to shift Electric Vehicle (EV) load; additional energy efficiency measures, residential storage, community solar, and microgrids; and look at long-duration storage and 100% hydrogen engine technology. Councilmember Brotman proposed that staff be directed to return to Council before the end of 2022 so that Council could assess progress on these items and make a decision at that time regarding whether to purchase Wartsila engines and how many Wartsila engines would be needed.

As requested by Councilmembers Najarian and Brotman, this report provides an evaluation of the Modified Alternative 7 Proposal.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Infrastructure and Mobility: The Grayson Repowering Project will ensure that the City of Glendale has a local, reliable energy generation resource to provide power reserves and help meet the City’s energy needs in the event of a transmission outage or other contingency.

Sustainability: The Grayson Repowering Project Alternative 7 will replace aging, inefficient units at the Grayson Power Plant with modern, efficient, lower-capacity units that meet current air emissions requirements along with 75 MW/ 300 Megawatt-hours (MWH) of battery energy storage. The Grayson Repowering Project will also eliminate the use of potable water for energy generation.
34 of 296
38c
3 1
7 0
Fiscal Responsibility: Repowering Grayson with modern technology will save money spent on highly-specialized and frequently-needed maintenance and repairs to the antiquated Grayson units. The flexible Wartsila units operate more cleanly and efficiently, thereby reducing operational costs. Based upon the Electric Cost of Service Analysis (which did not assume any modification of the project schedule) if the project is bond-funded it would not increase electric rates in the City of Glendale.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council proceed with implementing Grayson Repowering Project Alternative 7 as previously adopted, including procurement of five Wartsila engines as authorized pursuant to Resolution No. 22-29, and that the City Council provide direction to staff regarding implementation of additional distributed energy resources and energy efficiency. Delaying a decision regarding the procurement of Wartsila engines is not recommended.

BACKGROUND
On February 15, 2022, the City Council certified the Final EIR for the Grayson Repowering Project and adopted a resolution approving the selection of Alternative 7 (Tesla/ Wartsila Repowering), adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and made findings in support thereof, and adopting a Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Also, on February 15, 2022, Councilmembers Najarian and Brotman requested that staff present this report to address Councilmember Brotman’s proposed modification to the timing of Alternative 7’s implementation (modified Alternative 7), along with other recommended actions (collectively, the Brotman Proposal, as described under “Executive Summary” section of this report).

This report outlines the impacts of delaying a decision regarding whether to install Wartsila engines until the end of 2022, and the impacts of the additional recommended measures included in the Brotman Proposal.

ANALYSIS
Delaying the decision whether to purchase Wartsila engines, and how many engines to purchase, will significantly impact scheduling, construction sequencing, financing (bonding) the project, SCAQMD permitting, project costs, reputation and good will, and GWP’s ability to maintain reliable electric service.

Schedule Impacts
Delaying the decision on whether or not to purchase the Wartsila engines, and the number of engines to be purchased, is expected to extend the project schedule by at least nine months.

A delay/extension in the project schedule has several consequences, in summary:
Financial impacts – increased overall time and materials costs. These include, but are not limited to, increased construction costs due to extended time for 35 of 296
48c
3 1
7 0
project management, owner’s engineer, field work, builder’s risk insurance, multiple mobilizations, as well as the cost escalation of source materials, fabrications, and transportation/delivery.
Reliability –three summers without local dispatchable generation (other than Unit 9) to meet peak load demands and reserve requirements. Code changes – potential changes to the California Building Code, seismic or fire standards, or other codes and standards may require re-design and change orders, resulting in additional time and expense
Construction Impacts
Delaying the decision on the purchase of Wartsila engines will have consequences for contracting and procurement, engineering, and project sequencing and phasing of the work.
Unit 9 Separation.

The Unit 9 separation contract, and the demolition and site improvement contract have been on hold pending the City Council’s selection of a project alternative. Now that Council has selected Alternative 7, GWP plans to complete the bidding process for Unit 9 separation, and the demolition and site improvement contract can commence. Unit 9 separation work is scheduled to begin in November 2022 and be completed by March 2023. Once Unit 9 is separated from the other units, the other units will no longer function because the Unit 9 separation work includes disconnection and relocation of utilities necessary to ready the remaining facility safe for decommissioning and demolition.
 Lead Time for Engineering and Procurement. 1
Delaying a decision on the purchase of Wartsila engines delays the engineering work and long-lead procurement required to manufacture, deliver, and install the engines.

Specifically, this work includes design of the pile and foundation system, the engine seismic base isolation system, the engines and auxiliary systems, and other ancillary equipment. Additionally, generator step-up (GSU) transformers must also be procured to step up the 13.8 kilovolt (kV) output of the generators to 69 kW to match the GWP system. The GSU transformers are a long-lead item that require at least one year from order date until delivery; the order would be placed following Wartsila’s engineering work to finalize the transformer parameters.
1 “Long-lead items are construction and procurement items, such as equipment, products and systems that are identified at the earliest stage of a project to have a delivery time long enough to affect directly the overall project completion. Construction items typically include steel, concrete, pre-cast components, copper piping and wire. Long-lead procurement items are those with longer overall purchase and delivery timelines. The engineering design and purchase of these items are always highest priority in an EPC project.
36 of 296
58c
3 1
7 0
Contract Negotiations
Wartsila contract negotiations will have to be put on hold until staff has direction on whether to purchase and how many Wartsila engines to purchase. Impacts from this delay and lack of contract include exposure to potentially significant pricing changes, and lack of dedicated Wartsila engineering resources which is critical for coordinating a highly technical and integrated power project. Additionally, the scope of the engineering and design work cannot be defined until the number of Wartsila engines is known.

Engineering work, which must occur before manufacture, installation and commissioning of the engines, will also remain on hold until a decision is made. Site Preparation Impacts
Wartsila’s scope of work includes driving piles to support the Wartsila power island. This work involves a high level of vibration and is purposefully scheduled to occur at the beginning of the project, following demolition and before other equipment is set in place.

The number of piles needed depends on how many Wartsila engines are installed and the post-improvement site soil characteristics. If the City cannot commit to the number of Wartsila engines, that would leave two choices.

1. The City could assume all five Wartsila engines will be installed, and hire a contractor to drive piles for all five Wartsila engines at the completion of demolition and site improvement. Because the site prep/pile driving contract would not be with Wartsila, the City needs to consider additional impacts, including, but not limited the lost benefits from economies of scale, increased cost, less efficiency, need for more coordination, and increased overall risk.

These factors impact insurance and indemnity provisions, the degree of warranties and representations that Wartsila would be willing to provide if they are expected to take over a site prepared by another contractor. If the City chooses to prepare the site for the Wartsila engines before committing to purchase them, the City would need to undertake a procurement process and engage a contractor to do the pile driving.

2. The City could delay the pile driving until later, during or after the Tesla BESS is installed, creating risk that the BESS could be negatively affected by the pile driving.
Balance of Work Site Contract Impacts
Additionally, delaying a decision regarding the Wartsila implementation will delay the construction of the Glendale Switching Station. The Switching Station, which is being added to provide additional resilience to the City’s distribution system, is scheduled to be started after the completion of the Wartsila power island because the space that will be occupied by the Switching Station which is needed for construction laydown for the Wartsila engines and the balance of site work.
37 of 296
68c
3 1
7 0
Bond Financing Impacts
A delay in a decision whether to purchase Wartsila engines, and how many to purchase, will impact the bond financing for the project. For the reasons stated below the City’s financial advisor and bond counsel recommend a single bond issuance for the entire project.
oTwo bond financings: Under tax regulations, to issue a tax-exempt bond financing, the City must have a reasonable expectation of spending at least 85% if the bond proceeds within three years. (Otherwise, the bond becomes taxable). Without a decision to proceed with the Wartsila engines, the City would not have a reasonable expectation of spending the proceeds for the Wartsila engines. Therefore, the likely path would be to issue two separate bond financings for the project: one for the BESS, demolition and site preparation work; and another for the Wartsila engines. oDouble expense for bond financing: For each bond financing, the City will incur the expenses for rating agencies, lawyers, financial advisors, and consultants. Based upon experience, the City’s financial advisor estimates this cost at $500,000 per bond issuance. Breaking up the transaction into two bonds would therefore double the bond issuance expense to $1,000,000. oInterest Rate Risk: Delaying the decision on the Wartsila engines, and financing that portion of the project later, also subjects the City to a risk of an increase in interest rates.
oShorter term for BESS Bond: Because the BESS is a shorter-term asset, the term of the bond issuance would potentially be shorter than a bond issuance that includes assets with a longer life span. The Electric Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) presented to City Council on February 8, 2022, assumed a single 25-year bond issuance term for Alternative 7. Issuing two bonds, one of which may have a shorter term, has not been evaluated in the COSA and could have a different impact on electric rates. oUncertainty for Investors and Rating Agencies: Investors and rating agencies want evidence of stability and certainty. A deferred Wartsila procurement decision, and uncertainty about whether the City will actually construct the infrastructure to ensure reliable power supply for the City, is a significant concern for potential bond investors and rating agencies. The deferral of a decision will highlight governance issues and raises project commitment concerns that increase the risk, and consequently will impact the rating for this investment.
SCAQMD Permitting Considerations
The Modified Alternative 7 Proposal recommends permitting, but not necessarily installing, all five Wartsila engines and purchasing Emissions Reductions Credits (ERCs) assuming a purchase of all five units. If less than five units are purchased, the 38 of 296
78c
3 1
7 0
ERCs would be sold in the market, potentially at some loss.

As long as GWP is making progress, based upon representations of SCAQMD’s current administrators, the SCAQMD permit for five Wartsila engines can be held open for two or possibly three years. However, if installation is delayed too long, the permits will expire, and the City will risk exposure to regulatory changes and possible increases in the amount of offsets necessary for the project. A new permit process would trigger EPA review and public comment, a process that could take an additional year.

Based on the City’s current permit application, the estimated cost of ERCs for five Wartsila engines is $6,000,000. This estimate is based on an ERC calculation which utilizes the 2015-2016 baseline emission levels in the City’s current SCAQMD permit application.

Additionally, if the City ultimately were to decide to purchase less than five Wartsila engines, the City would need to permit more hours and starts for each unit, and change the proposed operating profile from that which is specified in the current permit application (the Alternative 7 permit application). A SCAQMD permit application – or an approved permit -- can be modified, but would likely require additional air quality analysis, review by SCAQMD, submission of an application to EPA, and public comment under SCAQMD rules. The City’s air permitting subject matter expert estimates this would result in at least a six-month impact to the schedule. It could also affect the SCAQMD’s consideration of baseline emissions and increase offset costs due to the new application date and the fact that many new source review requirements are applicable to each emission source individually, rather than the project as a whole. Overall Financial Impacts
The proposal to delay a decision on the Wartsila units will result in increased project costs, including, but not limited to:
oDevelopment Cost Increases: Cost of additional analysis, engineering, and planning work to evaluate and prepare for different project options. oConstruction Cost Increases: Extended project time, including consultant and labor expenses, multiple mobilizations, added complexity in construction sequencing, additional risk and mitigation costs. The final cost of the Wartsila engines cannot be determined until the City is committed to proceeding. oBond Cost Increases: Double bond issuance expenses; interest rate risk; potential investor and rating agency concerns with the City’s unwillingness to proceed with a significant portion of the project.
oReserves: Delaying the project results in one more summer - for a total of three summers -- without local dispatchable generation (other than Unit 9), requiring the City to purchase reserves for one additional summer. 39 of 296
88c
3 1
7 0
Reputational and Good Will Impacts
The Grayson Repowering Project is the result of over six years of detailed analysis and evaluation of alternatives. The City Council’s deferral of a decision on the procurement of generation units for Grayson will have an impact on third parties’ willingness to engage with the City in connection with the Grayson Repowering Project as sellers of energy or reserves during project construction, bidders, proposers and material suppliers, and bond holders for the project are all keen observers of our process. For example, it should be noted that in 2018, LADWP had committed to assist Glendale by selling GWP a limited amount of energy to help meet Glendale’s energy and reserve needs during the repower. When the City Council deferred a decision on the 2018 FEIR, LADWP’s withdrew its offer because it would not commit its energy resources to Glendale in perpetuity. 2
Reliability Impacts
On February 14, 2022, LADWP sent a letter to GWP confirming that the City of Glendale is responsible for providing its own reserves, except for the 80 MW, available for the first hour of a contingency only, that GWP purchases from LADWP under the BAASA. The letter clarifies that LADWP is not GWP’s transmission planner or planning coordinator. The LADWP letter directed the City to provide a written response specifying how Glendale intends to meet its reserve obligations. If the City holds off on a decision on the Wartsila generating units until December 2022, GWP will be unable to respond to LADWP’s request. As demonstrated at the February 15, 2022 hearing, GWP needs a local, dispatchable generation source in order to meet reserve requirements.

Delaying a decision on the Wartsila engines would mean three summer peak periods with no local dispatchable generation source other than Unit 9. Direction on Other Matters
The Modified Alternative 7 Proposal includes direction to City staff to:
Work with Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) to either purchase additional reserves, or re-define Glendale’s reserve obligations; Work on procuring up to 50 MW of additional distributed energy resources (DER) including: City-sited solar and storage; commercial and industrial solar and storage; more demand response with incentives and pricing, including to shift Electric Vehicle (EV) load; additional energy efficiency measures, residential storage, community solar, and micro-grids; and look at long- duration storage and 100% hydrogen engine technology;
Return to Council before the end of 2022 so that Council could assess progress on these items and make a decision at that time regarding whether 2 When GWP has direction from City Council Project phasing, GWP will renew its request to neighboring utilities to sell energy to Glendale during the repower. 40 of 296
98c
3 1
7 0
to purchase Wartsila engines and how many.

GWP recommends that the City Council adopt a motion directing staff to proceed with the aforementioned initiatives. However, staff does not recommend delaying a decision to proceed with the procurement of the five Wartsila engines, as they are needed for the City to maintain reliable electric service, even with the addition of 50 MW. In addition, it is staff’s assessment that we will not be able to provide any verifiable information on these other programs in nine to twelve months that would eliminate or mitigate the necessity to provide local, dispatchable generation in the amount established for the approved Alternative 7.
Negotiations with LADWP Regarding Reserves
GWP welcomes dialogue between elected officials regarding reserves and will continue to work with LADWP to seek opportunities to purchase or acquire additional transmission assets. However, staff does not recommend the City Council defer a decision to install local, reliable generation within Glendale based upon the recent suggestion that LADWP might be willing to supply Glendale’s reserves in perpetuity.

GWP is not in LADWP’s service territory, and LADWP is not tasked with providing electric service to GWP customers. Additionally, even assuming LADWP had excess energy or capacity, negotiations with LADWP will be a lengthy process. The completion of renewal agreements for GWP’s existing transmission rights (Hoover and Adelanto) began in 2015 and was completed in 2021. GWP strongly recommends proceeding with a plan to ensure that Glendale can maintain its energy independence, ensure reliability, cover its own contingencies and exert more control over costs, including those that could negatively impact customer rates.
Procurement of up to 50 MW of additional Distributed Energy Resources GWP is continuing its pursuit of additional DERs, including city-owned solar and storage; demand response measures tied to EV charging and residential storage, community solar and micro-grids. GWP is proud to be a leader among California utilities in terms of its ambitious energy efficiency targets and achievements. Even with five Wartsila engines, GWP still needs to maximize DER and EE in order to keep up with growing electrical demand and continue to reliably serve its customers. However, in order to reliably serve its customers, GWP needs dispatchable energy. Demand Response and Energy Efficiency measures are not dispatchable and cannot be used to meet reserve obligations. In addition, GWP must still maintain sufficient capacity to cover energy load when the demand response resources are not online. Thus, even a doubling of GWP’s Demand Response programs would not solve GWP’s capacity needs.

Furthermore, achieving an additional 50 MW of DER by December 2022 is not realistic given the time needed for procurement, development of programs, negotiation and execution of contracts, marketing and customers sign ups, and DER and EE implementation. It is important to note that the 2018 Clean Energy RFP programs are just getting off the ground in 2022. By frame of reference, the Franklin program (10 MW of demand response) requires four years of implementation from the date of contract 41 of 296
108c
3 1
7 0
execution, and the Willdan/Lime program (8.9 MW of energy efficiency) requires a 7- year implementation period from contract execution. The proposed Sunrun virtual power plant project discussed by the Council on February 8, 2022 was proposed at 25.25 MW and has taken over three years to negotiate, with substantive issues still outstanding. 50 MW of DER is twice that amount, and the Council has recently directed staff to work with Sunrun to negotiate a substantial reduction in the size and cost of the Sunrun program.

Even assuming the time frame is cut in half, the City will not be able to double its DER resources or provide verifiable information regarding this amount and type of DER by December 2022. In addition, cost impacts from increasing the size of DER programs also need to be considered, evaluated in a cost of service study and funded.

Lastly, and fundamentally, adding 50 MW of additional DER will not add enough energy to eliminate the need for the five Wartsila engines. Using the proposed Sunrun Virtual Power Plant as an example, 50 MW of the Virtual Power Plant would only supply 100 MWH. This represents just 3.7% of the average daily energy demand (2,680 MWH) that GWP provided in 2020-2021.
100% Hydrogen Engines Are Under Development
The Modified Alternative 7 Proposal also recommends deferring a decision on purchasing the Wartsila engines so staff can monitor the development of 100% hydrogen engine technology and long-duration storage. GWP does not recommend deferring a decision on the Wartsila engines on this basis for several reasons. First, GWP is currently tracking hydrogen technology, and Wartsila is already testing engines with 20% to 30% hydrogen by volume -- and has set a goal of developing a 100% hydrogen engine by 2025.

It is, however, not certain that a 100% hydrogen engine will be commercially available by 2025. Even if Wartsila meets is 2025 goal to develop at 100% hydrogen engine, installation at Grayson would require additional engineering, site preparation, and permitting. Even assuming 100% hydrogen engines could be installed at Grayson, their use is dependent on hydrogen pipeline permitting and development. That is not to say Wartsila may also develop retrofitting technology that increases current engine capacity to convert to an even more significant percentage of hydrogen as fuel.

GWP believes hydrogen technology development will continue in order for the Wartsila units to continue to run beyond 2045. Southern California Gas Company’s recent announcement of their intent to develop a hydrogen network in the Los Angeles Basin is a step in this direction. However, GWP does not believe it is prudent to risk the City’s reliable energy supply on the potential for a hydrogen pipeline to be permitted and constructed to serve the Grayson Power Plant within the next three years. Long-duration Storage Options
The Modified Alternative 7 Proposal recommends waiting to decide whether to purchase Wartsila units so that staff can continue to monitor long-duration storage technologies. 42 of 296
118c
3 1
7 0
At this time, there are several start-up technology companies looking for venture capital to develop long-duration battery storage, but there are no commercially-viable, tested technologies are on the market. There are additional technologies such as liquid air storage in the demonstration phase. These technologies are not likely to mature and become commercially viable by the end of this year. Existing long-duration storage technologies, such as hydro, are not suitable within the City of Glendale.

Because of the potential for future developments in storage technology, Alternative 7 includes installation of 50 MW of Tesla BESS immediately and installation of the remaining 25 MW of storage at a later time, when long-duration storage technology will have matured and prices will hopefully be lower. However, if the Council defers a decision on the Wartsila engines, GWP would recommend installing a 75 MW battery energy storage facility now. Although the 75 MW of battery energy storage would not be sufficient capacity to meet GWP’s peak demand and reserve needs, it would ensure 75 MW at the start. However, proceeding with a purchase of 75 MW of BESS now deprives the City of the potential benefit from less expensive and higher efficiency storage technology developments for Grayson.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The City issued a Notice of Preparation for the Grayson Repowering Project Environmental Impact Report from December 15, 2016 to January 20, 2017. The 2017 Draft EIR was circulated for at 62-day public comment period from September 18, 2017 to November 20, 2017. The 2018 Final EIR was presented to the City Council on April 10, 2018. At the April 2018 hearing, the City Council did not take action on the EIR but requested that GWP explore cleaner alternatives. During the 2019 Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) process, GWP reached out to the community and stakeholders for input on community preferences for GWP’s power supply planning and that input informed the 2019 IRP and Alternative 7, was evaluated in the 2022 FEIR. On December 15, 2020, an update on the Grayson Repowering Project alternatives was presented to the City Council. The 2021 PR-DEIR was circulated for public comment for a 92-day public review period from August 9, 2021 to November 15, 2021. On September 9, 2021, during the public comment period for the PR-DEIR, staff presented the PR-DEIR to the Sustainability Commission and the GWP Commission in a joint meeting. Public and commission comments from that meeting were recorded and included in the 2022 FEIR.

The 2022 FEIR was released on January 20, 2022.

Staff presented an informational item regarding the 2022 FEIR to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) on January 20, 2022. In accordance with Section

2.76.100(D) of the Glendale Municipal Code, if the EIR is certified, a demolition clearance permit will be brought back to the HPC for a determination whether to grant or deny the permit. The 2022 FEIR was presented to the GWP Commission on January 31, 2022 and to the Sustainability Commission on February 3, 2022. The GWP Commission unanimously adopted a motion recommending that the City Council certify the 2022 FEIR and selection of Alternative 7. The Sustainability Commission had a tie vote on whether to make a recommendation to the City Council. The Final Environmental Impact Report for the Grayson Repowering Project was certified on February 15, 2022.
43 of 296
128c
3 1
7 0

FISCAL IMPACT
Deferring a decision on the Wartsila units until December 2022 will result in increased project costs, including development cost increases, construction cost increases, bond cost increases, and increased costs to purchase reserves and energy during the repower. The potential Cost of Service and rate impacts of the Modified Alternative 7 Proposal were not evaluated in the electric COSA presented to Council on February 8, 2022.

The cost and rate impact of adding 50 MW of additional DER and EE measures remains to be determined. As presented to the City Council on February 8, 2022, the cost of a

25.25 MW capacity Sunrun program is $219,000,000. Adding 50 MW of DER would not be less expensive. The 100% Clean by 2030 study which estimated that achieving 89% clean energy by 2030 would require an estimated system average rate increase of 25% to 31% (in addition to the rate impact of the Franklin, Lime, and Sunrun programs).

Actual rate impacts would depend upon final pricing for the additional DER and EE measures and would need to be confirmed through a detailed cost of service analysis.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Final Environmental Impact Report for the Grayson Repowering Project was certified on February 15, 2022.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Provide direction to staff regarding the sequencing and schedule for Alternative 7.

Alternative 2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Christine Godinez, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
44 of 296

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ___________________________, seconded by Council Member _____________________, that the City Council directs Glendale Water & Power and the City to undertake the following actions:

1. Continue working with LADWP to re-define Glendale’s reserve obligation or to purchase additional reserves to cover Glendale’s reserve obligation.

2. Work on procuring up to 50 megawatts (MW) of additional Distributed Energy Resource (DER) technology including City-sited solar and storage, commercial and industrial solar and storage, more Demand Response with incentives and pricing, including to shift Electric Vehicle (EV) load, additional energy efficiency measures, residential storage, community solar, and microgrids.

3. Continue to consider and monitor the development of long-duration storage and 100% hydrogen engine technology.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
45 of 296
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO 22-29 TO PROVIDE DIRECTION TO

STAFF REGARDING THE PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT ALTERNATIVE 7 (TESLA/ WARTSILA REPOWERING) WHEREAS, the City's aging Grayson Power Plant is experiencing an increasing frequency in unplanned and forced outages, which threaten local reliability; and WHERAS, a majority of the existing generation units at the Grayson Power Plant would no longer be allowed to continue operating beyond 2023 without major air quality retrofits to meet South Coast Air Quality Management District emissions limits; and WHEREAS, without the Grayson Power Plant, the City will not have sufficient sources of power to meet energy demand within the City while maintaining sufficient power reserves; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Department of Water and Power studied Alternative 7, the Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative, as one of the Project Alternatives in the 2022 Final Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2016121048 (“2022 Final EIR”), as an option to repower the existing Grayson Power Plant and determined the Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative would meet the proposed Project objectives and would result in the fewest potential environmental impacts when compared to the proposed Project and other alternatives evaluated; and
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22- 28, Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Grayson Repowering Project, and making certain findings and determinations; and
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22- 29 approving Grayson Repowering Project Alternative 7 (Tesla/ Wartsila Project Alternative), adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Making Findings in support thereof, adopting a Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program, and directing staff to take actions in furtherance thereof; and
WHEREAS, after further consideration, the City has selected a phase-in of Alternative 7 for the repowering of the Grayson Power Plant, and has directed City staff to undertake specified actions, subject to Council approval, necessary to proceed with implementation of this phase-in, which includes the following direction and authorizations:
Pause implementation actions for the Wartsila Power Island until December 2022;
46 of 296
To issue bids for electric revenue bonds for Alternative 7 (or the portion of Revised Alternative 7 that can be bonded), prepare bond documentation, and seek City Council adoption of a bond ordinance;
Complete negotiations and issue a Final Notice to Proceed to Tesla to proceed with engineering and procurement for the Tesla power island, and to proceed with construction once a demolition clearance is obtained and demolition work is completed;
Complete the bidding process for separation of Unit 9 from the Grayson Power Plant and enter into a contract for the same;
Complete the bidding process for the demolition and site improvement work for the overall Grayson Repowering Project and following award, enter into a contract for the demolition and site improvement contract; and proceed with the demolition and site improvement work in a way that allows the City to easily add Wartsila engines at a later time; Release a Request for Proposal for the balance of site engineering, procurement, and construction contract for the work and costs to integrate the Tesla power islands into the Grayson Power Plant site; Proceed with South Coast Air Quality Management District permitting for five Wartsila engines; finalize the negotiation of contracts for the purchase of emissions reduction credits for Alternative 7, as revised by this Resolution, and present the same to the City Council for approval; Release a Request for Proposal for the demolition/construction phase Owner’s Engineer; and
Return to City Council no later than December 2022 for a decision regarding the purchase of Wartsila engines.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Glendale, California that:

SECTION 1. The recitals herein above are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of the findings in support of this resolution.

SECTION 2. Alternative 7 of Grayson Repowering Project, the Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative, defined herein as:
A 75 MW/300 MWH energy storage system;
Five Wartsila reciprocating internal combustion engine units producing approximately 93 MW net at average annual site conditions;
47 of 296
A new switching station; and
Related facilities,
As approved and adopted on February 15, 2022, Alternative 7 shall be phased in such that staff is directed not to commence the procurement, installation and construction of the Wartsila Power Island component, and such balance of site work for the Wartsila Power Island until December 2022, or earlier if directed by the City Council.

SECTION 3. Section 5 of City Council Resolution No. 22-29 is hereby amended and replaced with the following Section 5:
“SECTION 5. In furtherance of the Council’s selection of the Alternative 7 Tesla/Wartsila Project Alternative to repower the Grayson Power Plant, Staff is hereby directed to:
a. Pause implementation actions for the Wartsila Power Island until December 2022;
b. To issue bids for electric revenue bonds for Alternative 7 (or the portion of Alternative 7 that can be bonded, given the pause on procuring Wartsila engines), prepare bond documentation, and seek City Council adoption of a bond ordinance;
c. Complete negotiations and issue a Final Notice to Proceed to Tesla to proceed with engineering and procurement for the Tesla power island, and to proceed with construction once a demolition clearance is obtained and demolition work is completed; d. Complete the bidding process for separation of Unit 9 from the Grayson Power Plant and enter into a contract for the same; e. Complete the bidding process for the demolition and site improvement work for the Grayson Repowering Project and following award, enter into a contract for the demolition and site improvement contract, and proceed with the demolition and site improvement work in a way that allows the City to easily add Wartsila engines at a later time;
f. Release a Request for Proposal for the balance of site engineering, procurement, and construction contract for the work and costs to integrate the Tesla power islands into the Grayson Power Plant site;
48 of 296
g. Proceed with South Coast Air Quality Management District permitting for five Wartsila engines; finalize the negotiation of contracts for the purchase of emissions reduction credits for Alternative 7 (five Wartsila engines), and present the same to the City Council for approval;
h. Release a Request for Proposal for the demolition/construction phase Owner’s Engineer; and
i. Return to City Council no later than December 2022 for a decision regarding the purchase of Wartsila engines.”
Adopted this __________ day of ______________________, 2022. _________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
49 of 296

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Aram Adjemian, Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ________________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _______ day of ____________________, 2022, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

________________________________
City Clerk
50 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Joan Jones Holtz
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 4:55:03 PM
Please add to AMS
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Iris Edinger ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 7:26 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Joan Jones Holtz
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Iris Edinger
5534 Pattilar Ave.

Woodland Hills, CA 91367
[email protected]
(818) 883-4723
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
51 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Please reverse your Grayson decision!!
Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:28:52 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Katy Kassler ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:21 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Please reverse your Grayson decision!!
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
We live just down the road from Grayson, and my 6-year-old son's school is even closer. We love our neighborhood, and we are active members in our community. Please keep our neighborhood and my family safe.

This planet is in so much pain already--why would you CHOOSE to add to its destruction? People will take note of how council members are voting on this, so I beg you to reconsider. Put the residents of Glendale first. We don't want more polluting gas plants! None of us want this. Our health and safety matter. We matter. Please be part of the solution for a safer, cleaner, healthier planet. Our kids are counting on adults to be making the right decisions for their future. Let's not let them down.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Katy Kassler
1361 Highland Ave
Glendale, CA 91202
[email protected]
(909) 267-4316
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or 52 of 296
(415) 977-5500.
53 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Support Dan Brotman"s Motion on March 1
Date: Monday, February 28, 2022 10:19:56 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Joanna Pringle <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 8:53 AM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Support Dan Brotman's Motion on March 1

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Devine and City Council Members,

We’ve lived in Glendale for 36 years, our adult daughters were born and raised here.

We stand with Glendale Environmental Coalition and ask you to support Councilmember Dan Brotman’s motion on Grayson’s repowering.

Thank you for your optimism, inspiration, and strategic thinking. Thank you for your service to us.

Yours sincerely,

Joanna

Joanna Pringle
1555 Hillside Drive
Glendale, CA 91208
54 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 12:59:15 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Lee ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 12:46 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Technology is changing so fast, please don't build a power plant that will be obsolete by the time it's built. I total waste of money and resources.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Lee
3616 Las Palmas Ave
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(818) 642-7440
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
55 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 12:06:46 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Evan McDermit ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:24 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Evan McDermit
608 North Golden Ave.

Fullerton, CA 92832
[email protected]
(714) 906-4868
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
56 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:58:04 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Kristina Fukuda ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:36 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Kristina Fukuda
3544 Keystone Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90034
[email protected]
(213) 740-7541
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
57 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:37:41 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Joy Zadaca ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 5:09 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Joy Zadaca
203 W Stewart Way
Long Beach, CA 90807
[email protected]
(565) 555-5555
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
58 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:28:40 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: lindsay studant ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 5:48 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
lindsay studant
17451 bastanchury
yorba linda, CA 92886
[email protected]
(714) 223-2012
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
59 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:23:03 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Kristopher Anderson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:28 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Kristopher Anderson
2499 E Gerard Ave Spc 131
Merced, CA 95341
[email protected]
(209) 261-8293
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
60 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:20:55 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Stella Sias ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:37 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Stella Sias
1436 Killarney Ave
Los Angeles , CA 90065
[email protected]
(323) 821-3129
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
61 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:20:26 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Vartkes Torosian ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:17 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Vartkes Torosian
4405 Lowell Ave
Glendale, CA 91214
[email protected]
(818) 957-5892
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
62 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:04:59 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Amy Kwa ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:33 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Amy Kwa
2711 Franklin St
La Crescenta, CA 91214
[email protected]
(626) 623-8707
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
63 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:03:25 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Suzanne Tani ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:01 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Suzanne Tani
2673 N Vista Valley Road
Orange, CA 92867
[email protected]
(714) 345-5256
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
64 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:03:05 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Bisi ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:21 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please don not go through with this! A lot of us have moved here especially for the air quality.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Shawn Bisi
10355 Silverton Ave
Tujunga, CA 91042
[email protected]
(310) 890-4512
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
65 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:02:43 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Diane M. Carter ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 12:08 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Glendale city Council, Please reconsider your votes for Gas powered generation at Grayson. Bring Glendale up to date for a better, cleaner future. As a resident who lives near the Grayson plant I oppose using fossil fuels to generate my electricity. We need much more solar and wind to clean our air and reduce carbon emissions. I am personally affected by your choice to use gas. I am asking you to do the right thing by installing clean energy sources instead of gas which contributes to pollution and climate change. Please be part of the solution instead of the problem. It will also be much more costly to change at a later date. Don't pay for gas when what we need is CLEAN energy!
Diane M. Carter
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Diane M. Carter
524 Arden Ave.

Glendale, CA 91203
[email protected]
(818) 397-4478
66 of 296
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
67 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:02:12 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Ben Shiffrin ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 6:58 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
My son will be starting Kindergarten at Keppel - very close to this plant - in August. Let him breathe clean air. And LISTEN to your constituents.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Ben Shiffrin
512 W. Stocker St.

Glendale, CA 91202
[email protected]
(310) 488-0084
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
68 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:54:50 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Julia Segal ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:08 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
My family lives in Glendale both kids go to local public. Their health matters.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Julia Segal
1535 Hillside Dr
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(757) 574-7447
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
69 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:53:51 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Franziska Reff ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:11 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
My kids go to school close to the site and we live close by as well. Our air quality is already terrible with highways and other other pollution so we don't need more. Expanding Grayson is bad for our families' health and the climate! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Franziska Reff
413 W Elmwood Ave
Burbank, CA 91506
[email protected]
(415) 812-6675
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
70 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:53:04 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mary Ashley ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:27 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Bad for future city financial planning. Everyone ahead of the curve is going green. Get in line.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mary Ashley
2252 Del Mar Rd Apt 5
Montrose, CA 91020
[email protected]
(818) 384-4904
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
71 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:40:33 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Pamela Magathan ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Pamela Magathan
2401 Holly Dr
Los Angeles, CA 90068
[email protected]
(213) 309-2270
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
72 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:40:12 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: J D Lombardi ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:59 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
J D Lombardi
6716 Clybourn Ave
North Hollywood, CA 91606
[email protected]
(818) 245-0145
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
73 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:39:51 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Rob Seltzer ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:00 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Rob Seltzer
18408 Clifftop Way
Malibu, CA 90265
[email protected]
(310) 278-9944
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
74 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:39:26 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Charlotte Innes ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:03 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Why harm our poor planet further? Why poison the air further? I live only a couple of miles away from this proposed plant. I'd prefer to breathe clean air. This plant will contaminate the air. Please reconsider your decision.

Please think of clean energy solutions rather than contributing to climate change. Thank you.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Charlotte Innes
3209 Descanso Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90026
[email protected]
(323) 664-4100
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
75 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:38:55 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Tom Earnist ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:06 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
WAKE UP!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Tom Earnist
734 W 22nd St
San Pedro, CA 90731
[email protected]
(818) 434-0742
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
76 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:38:33 PM
Here it is
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Laura Strom ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:14 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I have a friend who lives in Glendale, and I visit there frequently. Please protect the environment of Glendale and reconsider this vote.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Laura Strom
10480 National Blvd., #223
Los Angeles, CA 90034
[email protected]
(310) 999-9999
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
77 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:37:29 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mary Mendelsohn ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:16 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Dear Council Members,
I want to live in a city with an eye to the future and clean energy production.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mary Mendelsohn
3521 Sierra Vista Ave
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(818) 957-1328
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
78 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:36:59 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Hillary Ostrow ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:29 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Hillary Ostrow
5835 Hesperia Ave
Encino, CA 91316
[email protected]
(818) 345-9868
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
79 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:36:29 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: David Rubin ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
The SCIENCE is that we CANNOT afford to continue to push fossil fuel consumption as we have in the past. IF this Council has ANY shred of human compassion for your children, your grandchildren and your great grandchildren, you will NOT pass this matter.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
David Rubin
9986 1/2 Tujunga Canyon Blvd
Tujunga, CA 91042
[email protected]
(818) 312-3362
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
80 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:36:07 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Caroline Zuckerman ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Caroline Zuckerman
25612 Oakbar Ct
Newhall , CA 91321
[email protected]
(661) 644-6141
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
81 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:35:47 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Dan Esposito ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:49 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Dan Esposito
1510 Rowell Avenue
Manhattan Beach , CA 90266
[email protected]
(310) 546-3737
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
82 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:35:19 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Sam Butler ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:57 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

There are better, more sustainable options available that will not lock the city into a long term dependence on polluting fossil fuels. Make the right decision for the city and for our climate.

Sincerely,
Sam Butler
8134 Westlawn Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90045
[email protected]
(310) 801-3444
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
83 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:34:58 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mha Atma Khalsa ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:57 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mha Atma Khalsa
1536 S Crest Dr
Los Angeles, CA 90035
[email protected]
(310) 203-0162
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
84 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:34:28 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Judith Guerrero ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:11 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Enough using fossil fuels the future is green, clean energy.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Judith Guerrero
8914 Riderwood Dr.

Sunland , CA 91040
[email protected]
(818) 419-9344
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
85 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:34:06 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Shannon Rhoades ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:16 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Shannon Rhoades
17176 sunset
Pacific palisades , CA 90272
[email protected]
(310) 702-6322
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
86 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:33:45 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: janet maker ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:19 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
janet maker
925 Malcolm
Los Angeles , CA 90024
[email protected]
(310) 470-4482
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
87 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:33:23 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Susan Rios ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:20 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
We need to move forward, not backward. Our lives, our planet depends on the decisions we make today. Move forrward to clean energy. We cannot do less! The consequences are now proven too dire! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Susan Rios
524 W. Wilson Ave.

Glendale, CA 91203
[email protected]
(818) 330-9256
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
88 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:32:59 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Cornelius ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:22 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Stacy Cornelius
530 Mountain Rd Apt A
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
[email protected]
(949) 813-5959
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
89 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:32:33 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jason Brock ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:26 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jason Brock
8347 Georgetown Avenue
Los Angeles , CA 90045
[email protected]
(619) 944-3929
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
90 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:31:28 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth Fife ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:32 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Fife
1530 S. Los Robles Ave.

Pasadena , CA 91106
[email protected]
(626) 799-2372
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
91 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:31:08 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Eric Swenson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:51 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Eric Swenson
3220 Altura Ave. Unit 228
Glendale, CA 91214
[email protected]
(626) 429-5690
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
92 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:30:41 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Spring ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:52 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Bruce Spring
4632 Glenalbyn Dr
Los Angeles, CA 90065
[email protected]
(323) 343-9093
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
93 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:30:18 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Noah Youngelson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:58 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Noah Youngelson
2449 Walgrove Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90066
[email protected]
(310) 499-8425
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
94 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:29:56 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Popoff ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:16 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Kathy Popoff
1150 W Capitol Dr
San Pedro, CA 90732
[email protected]
(310) 555-5555
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
95 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:27:55 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Eric Ericson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:31 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Eric Ericson
588 Radcliffe Ave
Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
[email protected]
(310) 459-6992
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
96 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:28:25 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Gary Charles ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:29 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,

HERE WE GO AGAIN MORE SICK PEOPLE FOR WHAT GREED NO NO NO NEVR AGAIN PLEASE I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Gary Charles
p.o. box 20321
Long Beach, CA 90801
[email protected]
(562) 901-0361
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
97 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:27:35 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Matt Powell ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:39 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Matt Powell
4608 Romberg Pl.

Woodland Hills, CA 91364
[email protected]
(661) 964-7256
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
98 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:26:36 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Sinclair ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:56 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Daniel Sinclair
2312 Chapman rd
La crescenta, CA 91214
[email protected]
(213) 435-9336
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
99 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:27:10 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Bridget MoloneySinclair ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:41 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
This will make Glendale a less safe place to live. It will also no doubt drive down property value.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Bridget MoloneySinclair
2312 Chapman Road
La Crescenta, CA 91214
[email protected]
(310) 502-7597
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
100 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:26:18 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Linda He?s ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 11:14 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Linda He?s
1255 N Los Robles Avenue Apt 20
Pasadena , CA 91104
[email protected]
(626) 304-0668
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
101 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:25:36 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: julie jacobson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 11:51 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
julie jacobson
17424 blythe st
northridge, CA 91325
[email protected]
(818) 351-9661
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
102 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:24:59 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Harlan Lebo ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:05 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Harlan Lebo
P.O. Box 614
La Mirada, CA 90638
[email protected]
(310) 871-4744
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
103 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:24:35 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Carol Ng ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:31 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Carol Ng
960 Edgecliffe Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90026
[email protected]
(323) 665-4448
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
104 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:22:27 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Bob Paquette ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:32 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Bob Paquette
2083 Las Lunas St
Pasadena, CA 91107
[email protected]
(626) 824-5926
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
105 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:21:59 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Grace Morsberger ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:45 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Grace Morsberger
1530 Berea Court
Claremont, CA 91711
[email protected]
(909) 626-8491
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
106 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:21:07 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Orlick ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:10 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Gordon Orlick
726 N Alfred St #7
Los Angeles, CA 90069
[email protected]
(323) 651-3375
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
107 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:20:28 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mir Faugno ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:42 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please make sure our grandchildren will have World that has Clean Air and Water-- Fossil fuels are for Fossils--not growing children
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mir Faugno
7777 W 91 St
Playa del Rey, CA 90293
[email protected]
(310) 305-1091
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
108 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:19:20 PM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Janelle Randazza ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 3:10 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'd like my kid to not develop asthma and live life as though he is smoking two packs of cigarettes a day simply because you all want to line your pockets.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Janelle Randazza
4142 W AVENUE 40
Los Angeles, CA 90065
[email protected]
(978) 590-0444
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
109 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:11:43 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Amira Mansour ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:10 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Amira Mansour
4615 Green Tree Lane
Irvine, CA 92612
[email protected]
(949) 786-6596
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
110 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:10:51 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Rita Zobayan ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:57 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Rita Zobayan
3242 Pontiac St
Glendale , CA 91214
[email protected]
(818) 371-0604
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
111 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:10:22 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Rachelle Cox ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 5:08 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Rachelle Cox
2323 ELDEN AVENUE APT 25
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
[email protected]
(714) 815-0540
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
112 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:09:46 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Henry Schlinger ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 5:26 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Dear Glendale City Council, especially Councilmember Ara Najarian, We want investments in clean energy and not in fossil fuels. This is the time to make the right decision for the future of our children and our planet, right here in Glendale! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Henry Schlinger
1755 W. Mountain St.

Glendale, CA 91201
[email protected]
(818) 726-9351
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
113 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:09:23 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: v and b Jones ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:07 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
No more carcinogenic, climate chaos-invoking fossil fuels please.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
v and b Jones
pob 9050
Torrance, CA 90510
[email protected]
(424) 999-9999
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
114 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:08:16 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Nibal Booker ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:51 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Nibal Booker
630 E. Acacia Avenue #11
Glendale, CA 91205
[email protected]
(619) 757-5791
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
115 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:06:57 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Noosha Niv ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:53 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
The decision to build these units will impact my health now (I have asthma) and will impact my daughter for the rest of her life as she combats the impact of climate change. We have amazing schools and public spaces for our children and a reputation for being a wonderful place for families. This decision erases that. Your legacy will be one that puts corporate profit over the health and wellness of our families. Please do better.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Noosha Niv
2653 Piedmont Ave
Montrose, CA 91020
[email protected]
(310) 528-7554
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
116 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:06:20 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Diane Loughbom ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:11 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
What Are you thinking do you want to personally cause more Environmental distraction for your families for future generations can you brains not think out of the box and find some clean options I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Diane Loughbom
721 N Valley Dr
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
[email protected]
(310) 383-7511
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
117 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:05:29 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Katlain Schultz ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:17 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Katlain Schultz
2690 Kennington Drive
Glendale, CA 91206
[email protected]
(310) 418-6757
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
118 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:04:46 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Molly Coogan ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:43 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please DO NOT allow this to happen. The increase in emissions will be abysmal. Emissions will increase by 7x air quality will be such that the pollution will impact our children as though they are smoking a pack of cigarettes a day.

We already do not meet EPA guidelines for emissions; this is going to hurt all of us.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Molly Coogan
601 N Adams Street
Glendale, CA 91206
[email protected]
(650) 773-6706
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
119 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:04:18 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Alice Hill ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:46 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
This is a blatant disregard for residents health and wellbeing! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Alice Hill
4223 New York Ave
La Crescenta , CA 91608
[email protected]
(818) 400-2152
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
120 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 3:12:03 PM
Another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mandy Novo-Lake ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 2:50 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I strongly oppose the expansion of the Grayson Power Plant. We can do better , and should do better considering hat we will need to phase out Grayson in 2045. This is a waste of taxpayers? money and will cause serious environmental harm. I voted for Paula Devine based on her vote against Grayson in the past. I will not do so again.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mandy Novo-Lake
1831 Sherer Ln
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(949) 400-2121
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
121 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:54:56 PM
Another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Hess ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:31 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I?ve been a homeowner and resident of Glendale for 15 years. I want to raise my 3 children in the most clean and healthy environment possible. I stand with the GEC, Sierra Club, Sunrise Movement and Earth Justice in support of moving away from fossil fuels. Thank you, especially, to Dan Brotman for all your work on this issue.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Joanna Hess
1646 Glorietta Ave
Glendale , CA 91208
[email protected]
(323) 708-3050
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
122 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:50:53 PM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Oscar Alvarez ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:29 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Oscar Alvarez
10628 Commerce Ave.

Tujunga, CA 91042
[email protected]
(213) 675-4708
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
123 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:41:52 PM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Randy Nichols ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:08 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I don't understand why it makes environmental sense to move forward with the Grayson upgrade right now. The logical thing to me is to limp along as long as possible because new clean energy resources and technologies will be emerging and coming on line in the near future, and we should reevaluate the Grayson project continually in light of these resources to see what makes sense. Jumping in right now is locking in the past which seems insane considering the urgency of addressing climate change now and the possible infusion of funds that may come in the near future for cleaner ways of generating power for us. Please slow down, there must be some stop gap measures we can take to delay this project a long as possible. Have you checked with top university civil engineering departments, such as Princeton, MIT, Caltech, etc. to get more evaluation and creative input. This whole endeavor feels rushed and stamped with bureaucratic old-think.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Randy Nichols
2718 Piedmont Ave Apt. 9
Montrose, CA 91020
[email protected]
124 of 296
(818) 248-9689
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
125 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:38:22 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: madeleine huttenback ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:20 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
madeleine huttenback
1501 el miradero ave
glendale, CA 91201
[email protected]
(213) 220-1169
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
126 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:36:37 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Hannah Bentley ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:18 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
The City Council's plan to increase greenhouse gas pollution when the State is already regularly overwhelmed with uncontrollable wildfires is simply idiotic.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Hannah Bentley
796 W. 38th Street
San Pedro, CA 90731
[email protected]
(310) 697-3996
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
127 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:34:38 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Maria Isabel Medina ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:07 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please reconsider your vote. I am thinking of my children and grandchild, and their future, which continued reliance on gas and fossil fuels in general threatens. It is time to reverse course and place confidence and commitment on clean energy sources.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Maria Isabel Medina
1138 Park Avenue
Glendale, CA 91205
[email protected]
(504) 914-6728
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
128 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:34:10 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jo Baxter ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:23 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jo Baxter
143 Marguerita Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90402
[email protected]
(310) 260-2842
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
129 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:32:05 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Tomassi ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:26 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Tomassi
3780 Edgehill Dr.

Los Angeles, CA 90018
[email protected]
(323) 919-4209
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
130 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:32:29 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Julie Adelson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:25 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
no new fossil fuels! Climate crisis demands solar and wind ONLY! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Julie Adelson
2810 6th St
Santa Monica, CA 90405
[email protected]
(310) 452-0195
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
131 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:31:37 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Valerie Halsey ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:26 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
My family lives at the border of north Glendale and La Crescenta. I'm writing to express my concern and disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

My children deserve clean air and leaders who make a concerted effort to put less pollution into our environment, not more. All of our children deserve this. Please do the right thing.

Sincerely,
Valerie Halsey
3575 El Lado Drive
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(323) 205-2332
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
132 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:30:55 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: ralph smith ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:58 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
ralph smith
12840 greene avenue
los angeles, CA 90066
[email protected]
(310) 555-1212
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
133 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:30:05 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Nina Macdonald ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:00 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Nina Macdonald
29421 Modjeska Canyon Road
Silverado, CA 92676
[email protected]
(714) 710-1310
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
134 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:29:40 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Christina Shellen ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:00 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
My 7 year old daughter attends school near the proposed site. This kind of pollution should never be within close range of children.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Christina Shellen
111 W Mountain St.

Glendale, CA 91202
[email protected]
(310) 279-2636
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
135 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:29:15 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Elease Stemp ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:04 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Let's not go backwards, please! We have the tech solutions to make natural gas generators obsolete and be better stewards of the planet for us, for our kids and future generations. Please reconsider options that is better for the city, economy and environment.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Elease Stemp
3514 Prospect Avenue
La Crescenta, CA 91214
[email protected]
(323) 377-0552
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
136 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:28:50 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Pardilla ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:08 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Pardilla
734 N Verdugo Road
Glendale, CA 91206
[email protected]
(646) 678-1592
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
137 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:26:25 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Amy Maoz ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:09 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Amy Maoz
1410 Norton ave
Glendae, CA 91202
[email protected]
(917) 282-6086
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
138 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:26:05 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Russell ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:28 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Andrew Russell
17134 Bullock St.

Encino, CA 91316
[email protected]
(909) 904-9228
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
139 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:23:25 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: David Stanbra ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:28 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
David Stanbra
1412 w Kenneth rd
Glendale, CA 91201
[email protected]
(310) 961-1166
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
140 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:23:02 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Alice Neuhauser ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:46 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Alice Neuhauser
1466 11th Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
[email protected]
(310) 275-7505
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
141 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:22:44 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Scott Jung ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:53 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Scott Jung
124 Monterey Road
south pasadena, CA 91030
[email protected]
(626) 395-6341
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
142 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:22:24 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Rosie Harald ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 9:56 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
My child?s school, Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is less than a mile away from this proposed location.

While we are encouraging our children to make environmentally conscious choices, we need the adults making the big decisions that matter for their future also making environmentally conscious choices. This proposed plan is a huge backwards step in the efforts to combat climate change and take care of our planet for the next generation.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Rosie Harald
3825 Lavell dr
Los Angeles , CA 90065
[email protected]
(585) 957-3938
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
143 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:21:58 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Reback ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:01 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mark Reback
2324 Lake Shore Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90039
[email protected]
(310) 392-0522
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
144 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:21:22 AM
fyi
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: George Grace ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:15 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
George Grace
3864 Clayton Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90027
[email protected]
(323) 660-2483
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
145 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:20:59 AM
fyi
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Richard Kornfeld ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:17 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Richard Kornfeld
3 W Colorado Blvd
Pasadena, CA 91101
[email protected]
(626) 797-3325
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
146 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:13:43 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Denise Levasseur ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:57 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Denise Levasseur
3535 Encinal Ave
Glendale, CA 91214
[email protected]
(818) 515-4005
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
147 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:11:59 AM
Please put this in file
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Kayo Mendoza ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:01 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I am a resident in La Crescenta and have been for over 30 years. I am strongly against investing in such a project as we should be investing in other innovative, creative ways to generate gas for the future our community and the well being of our citizens and children. I strongly request to please reconsider.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Kayo Mendoza
2848 Stevens St
La Crescenta, CA 91214
[email protected]
(818) 249-9669
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
148 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:11:22 AM
Please put in File
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Joanna Park ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:10 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Joanna Park
2706 Honolulu Ave
Glendale, CA 91020
[email protected]
(818) 317-1009
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
149 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 2:07:33 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: H Leabah Winter ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 12:54 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
These facilities pollute the air and are detrimental to the health of your friends and neighbors. This is especially true for children and the elderly who suffer from asthma and other airway and heart conditions. This pollution also travels and affects your neighbors in nearby cities. Please reconsider this wasteful plant.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
H Leabah Winter
2431 Mariner Square Dr Apt 302
Alameda, CA 94501
[email protected]
(805) 458-4348
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
150 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 5:00:14 PM
Here is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Edward Landler ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 6:09 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Edward Landler
1900 Alder Dr
Los Angeles, CA 90065
[email protected]
(323) 225-5955
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
151 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 4:59:54 PM
Here is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jim Stewart ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 6:43 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Why would you pay millions to emit more NOx and kill and injure all of us who live in the LA Basin??? You actions kill others! Stop!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jim Stewart
1216 S Westlake Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90006
[email protected]
(213) 820-4345
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
152 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 4:59:24 PM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Adair ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 6:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
If we?re going to have a chance of hitting our emissions reduction goals then we absolutely cants afford any new fossil fuel production/usage.

Please stop mortgaging away the future of myself and my children! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Nathan Adair
333 n Screenland drive
Burbank , CA 91505
[email protected]
(412) 779-8234
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
153 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 4:54:42 PM
Please add to AMS
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Tom Earnist ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 8:08 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Glad I no longer pay taxes in Glendale, but I used to. Glendale you're missing an opportunity to do the right thing here!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Tom Earnist
734 W 22nd St
San Perdro, CA 90731
[email protected]
(818) 434-0742
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
154 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022 11:53:31 AM
FYI
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: diana koeck ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 10:29 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Every individual makes a difference in the fight against climate change. YOUR actions MATTER to our planet.

Please , please reconsider your vote for 93 MX of Gas Generation at Grayson. Please do your part and help our planet SURVIVE. The Earth is at a tipping point and YOUR VOTES MATTER! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
diana koeck
1000 South Coast Drive., #K-107
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
[email protected]
(949) 646-7454
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
155 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:32:34 PM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Igor Tregub ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:43 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Igor Tregub
1043 Virginia St.

Berkeley, CA 94710
[email protected]
(510) 295-8798
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
156 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:39:12 AM
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jim Nasella ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:25 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
We have to find other ways to produce power without burning fossil fuel natural gas which contributes to global warming and future destruction of many parts of our healthy natural environment and world. This is a heavy burden that we acnnot avoid,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jim Nasella
1423 Winchester Ave
Glendale, CA 91201
[email protected]
(818) 241-3828
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
157 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:39:01 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Dave Swartz ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:40 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Dave Swartz
23414 Magic Mountain PKWY
Valencia, CA 91355
[email protected]
(661) 341-4610
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
158 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Agenda Item 8c-GWP re: Grayson Repowering Project Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:48:37 PM
Attachments: Smith- FEIR Comments 2 13 22-FINAL.pdf
Attachment 1.pdf
Attachment 2.pdf
Attachment 3.pdf
Attachment 4.pdf
Another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Smith, Francesca@DOT <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 3:00 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Agenda Item 8c-GWP re: Grayson Repowering Project

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Devine and Members of the City Council:

On behalf of Glendale Residents Against Environmental Destruction, I am a little bewildered by tonight’s agenda item, which is apparently to reconsider a project that was approved two weeks ago and for which an FEIR was certified. Final CEQA determinations are supposed to go hand in hand with final project approvals.

Regardless, since you are reconsidering the project: I write again to object to the inadequate environmental review of the historic resource impacts associated with the Grayson project. I urge you to send the project, along with an EIR, to the City’s own Historic Preservation Commission for its review. But before then, the City must as part of the EIR complete an actual evaluation of the historic resource to determine its significance, and seriously consider an alternative to demolition of the Boiler Building. If demolition is infeasible, its infeasibility must be demonstrated rather than insinuated.

Thank you for your consideration. I refer you to my attached letter dated Feb. 13, 2022 with its 159 of 296
attachments for further details.

Sincerely,

Francesca Smith

160 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Comments on Agenda Item 8c re: Grayson Repowering Project Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:20:47 PM
This is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Scott Fraser <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 4:21 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Comments on Agenda Item 8c re: Grayson Repowering Project

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Devine and Members of the Glendale City Council:

It appears you are reconsidering aspects of the Grayson Repowering Project at tonight’s Council meeting, even though the Final EIR was certified and a project approved at your last meeting.

Therefore, I write to urge you to take this last opportunity to send this project and EIR to the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for review and a recommendation as required under the Glendale Municipal Code and CEQA.

For reasons I don’t understand, the City has decided to exclude the Commission that is charged with reviewing and making recommendations regarding projects and environmental review documents when there are potential historic resource impacts, even though the City acknowledges Grayson is a historic resource. The informal “update” without a public hearing offered at the January 2022 HPC meeting does not count.

The City’s handling of Grayson as a historic resource does a grave disservice to the public and violates CEQA.

It is not too late to fix your process.

Thank you.

Scott E. Fraser
[email protected]

161 of 296
162 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: In support of Grayson Alternative 7
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:51:45 PM
Another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Kurt Sawitskas <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 6:41 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>
Cc: Young, Mark <[email protected]>; Golanian, Roubik <[email protected]>; Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>; Emrani, Yazdan <[email protected]>; Dave Tateosian <[email protected]>
Subject: In support of Grayson Alternative 7

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Mayor Devine and Council Members,
My thoughts on the Grayson Repowering Alternative 7, and contentions that it is not “green” enough:

Batteries will be a great addition to our distribution system. Batteries are system buffers, and can be used to manage short-term changes in load without running thermal generation. That will potentially reduce the number of starts on our thermal generation. Batteries can also be used overnight instead of thermal generation when solar cannot supply power – but have a limited capacity.

Batteries are not an unlimited power source. They need to be charged. Green sources to charge batteries (solar, wind) are largely only available during daylight hours. The reality is that batteries are sometimes a load on the system and must be charged at the same time as we deliver power to typical loads. So, the system must be designed to carry customer load AND charge the batteries at the same time.

The genius of having 5 Wartsila engines in the Alternative 7 configuration is that they can be spun-up (and down) one at a time, as needed to meet load. The Wartsila engines can meet the 10 minute start requirement. Alternative 7 allows highly granular operational capacity and is far superior to Alt.

8. The Alternative 8 configuration has much less operational flexibility to meet load and will take up 163 of 296
to 2 hours to bring online. Alternative 7 is clearly the operational and environmental winner.

It is simplistic to think that adding Transmission to GWP’s portfolio will solve the problem.

Transmission sources might be “green,” but might not be, either. While Transmission could add power to the bottom line, it reduces reliability in contingency scenarios and increases our vulnerability to external rate increases. Transmission is not local generation, and therefore puts us in a greater reliability predicament. Added transmission increases our chance of blackouts in the N-1 and N-1-1 scenarios because it might be the transmission component which is lost.

GWP currently leads the state and our neighboring cities with a 64% clean energy portfolio - and growing. I agree that we – and the rest of the whole planet – should reduce carbon emissions. We must focus on our overall environmental impact, not just this project. On a local (or planet-wide) scale, this project is a grain of sand, among billions of other sources. The net gains and residual emissions impact of this project are far better than pollution impacts of other common emitters, such as transportation.

We should accept this project and move our attention to reducing pollution in the transportation sector. By building Grayson Alternative 7, we will be able to reliably generate enough power to supply building and vehicle electrification. The transportation sector currently accounts for 44% of California’s carbon emissions. It is an achievable goal to cut that in half with vehicle electrification.

Grayson may not be 100% “green,” but the overall emission reductions are clear and substantial.

Stationary sources are much cleaner than mobile sources. Properly powering Grayson with 5 Wartsila thermal engines will enable the operational flexibility to meet demand in the least polluting way. The little gas needed to supply vehicle electrification will result in a net reduction in emissions.

The Wartsila engines will be able to use hydrogen when that becomes available. Sempra Energy (SoCalGas) released a statement on February 17, 2022 saying, “ Sempra Energy’s Southern California
Gas Co. utility is proposing to develop what it says would be the largest U.S. green hydrogen pipeline system, part of an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help California meet its ambitious climate targets.” Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/technology/california- s-socalgas-plans-largest-u-s-green-hydrogen-network
GWP was able to substantially reduce the project cost between the 2018 configuration and Alternative 7. Bond financing was arranged so that ratepayers would not see an increase. Adding solar, more batteries, or additional transmission will result in substantial cost increases to ratepayers.

The idea of moving ahead with site preparation and engineering, but not purchasing the Wartsila engines while we imagine that we can find a unicorn solution is a costly folly. There is no more time to mitigate our energy problem by curtailing use while we wait for a miracle. We can’t even get people to separate their trash, or use their car’s ashtray. What makes you imagine that the citizenry will modify energy habits in any way substantial enough to avoid needing more generation until we can be 100% green?
Let’s talk a little about “street economics.” One proposal suggests that the project move ahead partly - just stalling the purchase of the Wartsila engines. As if that won’t be costly. As soon as vendors know that Council tied GWP’s hands to having to buy solar infrastructure, the solar vendors’ incentive to be competitive is gone. With no alternative generation capacity, Glendale will be paying premium prices on transmission contracts and solar equipment – and wind up with an unreliable system. Further delaying the Wartsila purchase risks cost increases and delivery delays when we finally decide that we need them. Delay also means that the engines will be funded under a separate bond, which will be more costly than funding the project entirely on one bond.

Stop looking for a unicorn. Grayson Alternative 7 is a good and valuable project. Don’t let perfection be the enemy of a great project. I urge you to direct GWP to proceed with Alternative 7 immediately in its full configuration. Keep rates down, balance environmental impacts with practical needs, and keep the power on!

Sincerely,
Kurt Sawitskas
164 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Letter from Glendale Chamber of Commerce Supporting Grayson Repowering Attached Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:13:28 PM
Attachments: Letter to City Council Re. Grayson Repower.pdf More

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Judee Kendall <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 4:54 PM
To: Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Golanian, Roubik <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>
Cc: Young, Mark <[email protected]>; Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Letter from Glendale Chamber of Commerce Supporting Grayson Repowering Attached

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Devine and City Council Members,

Please see the attached resend of the letter of support for the Grayson Repowering from the Glendale Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors.

Thank you.

JUDEE KENDALL | President-CEO

701 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 120
Glendale, CA 91203
O. 818-240-7870 F. 818-240-2872
www.glendalechamber.com

From: Judee Kendall
165 of 296
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 10:40 AM
To: Ara Najarian <[email protected]>; Ardy Kassakhian <[email protected]>; Daniel Brotman <[email protected]>; Paula Devine <[email protected]>; Roubik Golanian <[email protected]>; Vrej Agajanian <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Young <[email protected]>
Subject: Letter from Glendale Chamber of Commerce Supporting Grayson Repowering Attached

Dear Mayor Devine, Members of the City Council, and Roubik Golanian,

Please find attached a letter from the Glendale Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors stating our support for the repowering of Grayson.

We thank each of you for your time and effort on this important project for Glendale.

Best regards,

JUDEE KENDALL | President-CEO

701 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 120
Glendale, CA 91203
O. 818-240-7870 F. 818-240-2872
www.glendalechamber.com

166 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: March 1 Council, item 8c: GRAYSON REPOWERING Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:07:21 PM

More

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Arlene Vidor <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:07 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>; Ardashes Kassakhian <[email protected]>; Golanian, Roubik <[email protected]>; Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: March 1 Council, item 8c: GRAYSON REPOWERING

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

To Mayor Devine and City Council members Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian and Najarian,

GLENDALE WATER AND POWER can do whatever it sets its mind to. Example: Grayson reducing from 263 to 93 MW, even though GWP originally said that couldn’t be done.

GWP knew years back that this day was coming and clean energy solutions were not pursued aggressively/rapidly enough to avoid tripping over this large, costly replacement of obsolete technology.

We don't know what the future holds for readapting the proposed Wartsila engines. Also a bond issue of this magnitude should be an investment in our long term future and not include obsolete equipment.

I want Mr. Brotman's motion of February 15 to be carefully considered and acted upon. I also thank those council members who were receptive to his suggestions and supported him taking the time to explain them.

The outcome of tonights meeting needs to be a written zero carbon action plan that includes dates of completion for sourcing of additional reserves and a very careful phasic approach to the implementation of any Wartsila engines as described by Mr. Brotman in his motion.

The adoption of Alternative 7 is unacceptable as it stands.

Thank you all for supporting tonight’s important revisit of this matter.

I wish you the best.
167 of 296

Arlene Vidor
Glendale Resident

168 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: March 1 Support for Brotman Amendment to Grayson Power Plant Decision Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:42:17 PM
This is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Debra Burchett-Lere <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:35 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: March 1 Support for Brotman Amendment to Grayson Power Plant Decision

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Devine, Council Members Agajanian, Brotman, Kassakhian and Najarian, and City Clerk -

Thank you again for your dedication and service to our community, especially with the last meeting and all the discussion regarding the Grayson Power Plant. I called into the meeting and watched it until the end.

I am very hopeful that you will consider the proposed Amendment to the decision that is being presented by Councilman Dan Brotman on March 1. I support his proposal and believe it is important in the next phases of the Grayson Power Plan expansion, the needs of the growing population and requirements for power, as well as our vital environmental concerns.

As a resident of Glendale for over 30-years and living close to the power plant, it is extremely important that Glendale moves to the greener solutions for powering our city.

It is crucial that we take into consideration the long-range goals of our city/county/state’s need to reduce fossil fuels for the good of our planet.

I realize that there needs to be demand responses when it gets very hot and everyone 169 of 296
needs reliable power. I understand are many factors that go into running our own power system, but it seems that this is an opportunity for Glendale to work together to find the best way to use energy in a way that keeps our world a better place to live. Encouraging the installation of solar on individual homes could be one solution to help augment peak use, etc.

We are fortunate to have our own GWP system and by adding more green energy options we can meet the demands imposed on the city as well being forward-thinking for years to come.

I truly appreciate all you do for Glendale. I know it is a complicated job being a council member, and thank you again.

Debra Burchett
1146 N Central Ave 181
Glendale 91202
[email protected]
170 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Please Support Dan Brotman"s March 1 Motion Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:10:19 AM
This is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Richard Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Support Dan Brotman's March 1 Motion

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Councilmember Agajanian,

As a resident in the Verdugo Woodlands I strongly support Councilmember Dan Brotman’s motion which is coming up for a vote tomorrow. I also back the Environmental Coalition's efforts to bring more renewable energy to Glendale.

Climate change is leading to devastating fires and dryness in California and terrible storms other places and we must respond quickly.

Thank you.

Rick Stern
1411 Andenes Drive
Glendale 91208
818-606-5110
171 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Please Support Dan Brotman"s March 1 Motion Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:10:38 AM
Here is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Richard Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Support Dan Brotman's March 1 Motion

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Devine,

As a resident in the Verdugo Woodlands I strongly support Councilmember Dan Brotman’s motion which is coming up for a vote tomorrow. I also back the Environmental Coalition's efforts to bring more renewable energy to Glendale.

Climate change is leading to devastating fires and dryness in California and terrible storms other places and we must respond quickly.

Thank you.

Rick Stern
1411 Andenes Drive
Glendale 91208
818-606-5110
172 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Please Support Dan Brotman"s March 1 Motion Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:11:14 AM
This is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Richard Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Support Dan Brotman's March 1 Motion

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Councilmember Kassakhian,

As a resident in the Verdugo Woodlands I strongly support Councilmember Dan Brotman’s motion which is coming up for a vote tomorrow. I also back the Environmental Coalition's efforts to bring more renewable energy to Glendale.

Climate change is leading to devastating fires and dryness in California and terrible storms other places and we must respond quickly.

Thank you.

Rick Stern
1411 Andenes Drive
Glendale 91208
818-606-5110
173 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Please Support Dan Brotman"s March 1 Motion Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:11:33 AM
Another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Richard Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Support Dan Brotman's March 1 Motion

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Councilmember Najarian,

As a resident in the Verdugo Woodlands I strongly support Councilmember Dan Brotman’s motion which is coming up for a vote tomorrow. I also back the Environmental Coalition's efforts to bring more renewable energy to Glendale.

Climate change is leading to devastating fires and dryness in California and terrible storms other places and we must respond quickly.

Thank you.

Rick Stern
1411 Andenes Drive
Glendale 91208
818-606-5110
174 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Please Support Dan Brotman"s March 1 Motion Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:09:30 AM
Here is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Richard Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>
Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Support Dan Brotman's March 1 Motion

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dan,
I want you to know you have my and my wife Marsha’s support. I have sent the following email to all four other council members:

As a resident in the Verdugo Woodlands I strongly support Councilmember Dan Brotman’s motion which is coming up for a vote tomorrow. I also back the Environmental Coalition's efforts to bring more renewable energy to Glendale.

Climate change is leading to devastating fires and dryness in California and terrible storms other places and we must respond quickly.

Thank you.

Rick Stern
1411 Andenes Drive
Glendale 91208
818-606-5110
175 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Refine the Grayson project intelligently tonight: consider world events; support Brotman"s motion.

Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:36:26 PM
This is another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Joanne Hedge <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 3:53 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]> Cc: Golanian, Roubik <[email protected]>; Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]> Subject: Refine the Grayson project intelligently tonight: consider world events; support Brotman's motion.

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

March 1, 2022

Attn:

Glendale Mayor Paula Devine
Glendale City Council Members Ara Najarian, Ardy Kassakhian, Dan Brotman, Vrej Agajanian
Glendale City Manager Roubik Golanian
Glendale City Clerk Aram Adjemian

Greetings:

The front section of the Los Angeles Times today, which I hope you’ll peruse, contains the most comprehensive coverage and thoughtful editorial comment to date re the troubing Russia-Ukraine events. I was struck by its underlying urgent message: wean the world off its dependency on fossil fuels—for reasons beyond climate and environment--that underlies the geopolitical stress test we’re watching unfold with tragic results.

176 of 296
Energy, pipelines, and other transmission systems are being used as bargaining chips for life-threatening shortages in warring international scenarios, with oil- and gas-rich Russia led by an unstable Putin as aggressor, and ordinary citizens the victims.

You’re invited to sample three articles: Business section columnist Michael Hiltzik’s piece today, “Sanctions chip away at ‘Fortress Russia’” (page A8); the sobering editorial in the Opinion section, “On climate, delay equals death” (page A10); and the on the front page, “U. N. calls for urgent action on climage threat” by Ian James.

Our elected officials and staff would do well to dive into the Times first section which contents on numerous energy-related events and risks warn: Get Off Gas Pronto.

This 26-year Glendale Rancho resident whose home is just upriver from the Grayson plant is appealing to the wisdom of our Mayor and City Council, to GW&P, IBEW union, and our Chamber of Commerce, in the final hours council moves to confirm Item 8c, the much-debated repowering plan, tonight (Charter channel 6, AT&T U-verse channel 99,
glendaleca.gov/life, on YouTube.com/myglendale. Also Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices using Screenweave free app “Glendale TV". See https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/public-meeting-portal . Call-in for public
comments: 818-937-8100.

Councilman Dan Brotman’s motion reflects needed insight and refinement to a document impacting our local fossil-fuel microcosm, which mirrors the global macrocosmic change needed now to more courageously and purposely move humanity forward (including my neighbors) to safety and sanity. Please support his motion!

Respectfully,

Joanne Hedge

GLENDALE RANCHO NEIGHBORHOOD

ASSOCIATION
1415 Garden Street, Glendale CA 91201
Founded 1999
818-244-0110 Office
[email protected]
[email protected]
177 of 296
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

178 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: sea level rise
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:07:27 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Feinstein ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:21 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: sea level rise
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Arthur Feinstein
590 Texas Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
[email protected]
(415) 282-5937
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
179 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: Support Brotman"s motion on March 1
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:03:02 AM
Another one

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act.

From: Rachel Pringle <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 9:39 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Agajanian, Vrej <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]> Cc: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: Support Brotman's motion on March 1

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Glendale City Councilmembers,

I am a Glendal resident and vote in every local election. I am writing to urge you to support Councilmember Brotman's motion, especially in light of the UN's just released report on climate change.

The U.N,'s 2022 report on climate change paints a dire picture. According to New York Times, "The report, which was approved by 195 governments, shows how widespread and severe the impacts of human-caused global warming are becoming worldwide — and how hard it will be for societies and ecosystems to manage if nations do not bring greenhouse gas emissions down sharply." As CNN quoted
from the report, "delay means death."

In the face of such a dire warning from the U.N., it is shocking that Glendale has approved building gas-burning engines that will increase greenhouse gases, rather
than work to "bring them down sharply." Glendale must act with urgency in moving towards clean energy. Please approve Dan Brotman's motion to delay approving these gas burning engines.

By moving towards clean energy, Glendale can also help combat Russia's power. 180 of 296
According to the Los Angeles Times, "Doubling down on oil and natural gas isn’t the answer... The war in Europe adds to the urgency of transitioning to clean energy sources such as solar and wind power that are harder for bad actors such as Russia to disrupt."

Please think of our safety, security, and health. I urge you to support Dan Brotman's motion.

Thank you,
Rachel Pringle
181 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:32:40 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Diana Bohn ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 7:48 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Diana Bohn
618 San Luis Rd.

Berkeley, CA 94707
[email protected]
(510) 525-5497
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
182 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:05:58 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jan Leath ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:22 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jan Leath
1128 Princeton Drive
Glendale , CA 91205
[email protected]
(818) 507-1004
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
183 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:33:07 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Babbitt ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 7:34 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
There are clean, non life threatening energy sources that can be implemented. Continuing to burn fossil fuels is going to be the death of all of us and future generations due to greed. Please, do the humane thing and let us and every living creature on our life giving planet just live. Thank you.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Katherine Babbitt
1515 Ard Eevin Avenue
Glendale, CA 91202
[email protected]
(818) 726-2984
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
184 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:09:06 AM
Another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: David McCoard ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:17 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Around the state, distributed solar and storage are becoming mainstream, and natural gas generation is on its way out. Continued investment in natural gas generation would waste resources that could be used for the former.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
David McCoard
725 Kearney St.

EL CERRITO, CA 94530
[email protected]
(510) 524-5171
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
185 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:38:30 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Eliza Gibson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2022 11:42 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
WHY ADD TO THE BAD AIR QUALITY? IT WOULD BE MORONIC. HORRIFIC FIRE SEASON IS THE NEW NORMAL, WITH UNBEARABLE HEATand SMOKE MAKING THE AIR EXTREMELY UNHEALTHY and TOO POLLUTED TO BREATHE IN. INSTEAD INVEST IN LARGE STORAGE BATTERIES AND PUT SOLAR PANELS EVERYWHERE. THEY ARE NOT THAT BAD WHEN USED FOR SHADE LEAVING SPACES IN-BETWEEN FOR SOME LIGHT TO COME THROUGH. THEY WOULD PROVIDE SHADE OVER BUS BENCHES and OPEN PARKING LOTS. WHY NOT INSTALL SMALL ONES ON TOP OF STREETLIGHTS and TRAFFIC LIGHTS. YOU COULD EVEN HAVE JUST PLAIN SOLAR PANEL ARBORS, THAT WOULD HELP WITH SHADE ON VERY SUNNY HOT DAYS. ALL THE ONE STORY BUSINESSES and MALLS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE SOLAR PANELS ON THEIR ROOFTOPS. GET CREATIVE WITH SOLAR PANELS. JUST LOOK AROUND and NOTICE WHERE SOLAR PANELS COULD BE INCLUDED, ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE. IT IS A MUCH BETTER INVESTMENT and IT IS INNOVATIVE. FOSSIL FUELS WILL BECOME AS OLD AS A FOSSIL, DON'T INVEST IN THAT.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Eliza Gibson
950 North Kings Road
West Hollywood, CA 90069
186 of 296
[email protected]
(310) 927-2938
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
187 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:09:40 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Darrell Clarke ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:13 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm a resident of next-door Pasadena and very concerned about cutting GHG emissions from electricity generation.

The answer must be no more fossil-fueled plants!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Darrell Clarke
158 S Madison Ave #102
Pasadena, CA 91101
[email protected]
(310) 210-9813
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
188 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:36:36 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Amira Mansour ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 2:14 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Amira Mansour
4615 Green Tree Lane
Irvine, CA 92612
[email protected]
(949) 637-2267
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
189 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:10:07 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Ofer Sapir ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:09 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Ofer Sapir
19696 Grand View Drive
Topanga, CA 90290
[email protected]
(310) 737-8010
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
190 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:39:29 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Robin Newquist ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2022 2:46 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I support Dan Brotman?s motions at Glendale City Council on March 1, 2022 @ 6 pm. Please don't repeat the mistake made by your neighbor Pasadena and become the last city to build a new dirty energy facility.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Robin Newquist
88 Grace Terrace
Pasadena, CA 91105
[email protected]
(626) 590-4739
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
191 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:10:26 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Cheryl Freeman ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:06 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please reconsider. This is a backward step and your constituents want progress toward clean sources of energy.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Cheryl Freeman
3309 Marcus Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92663
[email protected]
(949) 673-1065
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
192 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:39:56 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Mha Atma S Khalsa ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2022 1:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Mha Atma S Khalsa
1536 S Crest Dr
Los Angeles, CA 90035
[email protected]
(310) 203-0162
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
193 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:10:50 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Rivers ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:06 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Matthew Rivers
11401 Tampa Ave Unit 108
Porter Ranch, CA 91326
[email protected]
(818) 360-6797
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
194 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:40:42 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Robert Wilkerson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 10:10 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
NO MORE FOSSIL FUELS!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Robert Wilkerson
PO BOX 5062
COVINA, CA 91723
[email protected]
(619) 692-1133
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
195 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:11:14 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Park ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:04 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Benjamin Park
1360 N Laurel Ave
West Hollywood, CA 90046
[email protected]
(520) 275-5204
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
196 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:43:23 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Cynthia Shallit ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 8:40 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please find an alternative for using the gas generators. The climate crisis is NOW. Do not delay in transitioning to renewable fuels ike solar.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Cynthia Shallit
1423 8th avenue
Sacramento Indivisible, CA 95818
[email protected]
(916) 533-3708
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
197 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:11:30 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Cecily Rhett ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:55 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
This is the wrong time for more polluting energy in Glendale. Let's move towards clean energy that will maintain good air quality. Nobody wants their children breathing polluted air. Air quality is something we take seriously when choosing where to live and work, and I'm sure many other homeowners and prospective buyers feel the same way. Keep the jewel city sparkling. Reconsider your vote on Grayson! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Cecily Rhett
3465 Downing Ave
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(323) 251-1202
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
198 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:44:11 AM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Yu ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 2:58 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

As a former resident of Glendale, I know that Glendale can do better! Please support clean energy. The world depends on it.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Lisa Yu
1810 Prosser Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90025
[email protected]
(310) 463-1556
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
199 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:11:53 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Claire Broome ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:54 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I live in California and appreciate our state goals to address the climate crisis. What Glendale does affects us all.

Renewable energy has proven itself--please don't invest in gas--this will result in stranded assets to burden your tax payers, and put methane into our shared atmosphere.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Claire Broome
26 Northgate Ave
Berkeley, CA 94708
[email protected]
(510) 248-9999
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
200 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:44:43 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jacquelyn Karambelas ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 8:19 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
We have young kids who deserve clean air!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jacquelyn Karambelas
421 N Isabel St
Glendale, CA 91206
[email protected]
(323) 919-7594
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
201 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:12:09 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Darrell Neft ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:52 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Darrell Neft
3132 Madeira Av
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
[email protected]
(714) 241-9387
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
202 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:45:46 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Eileen Taschereau ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:13 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Eileen Taschereau
1952 18TH ST APT C
SANTA MONICA, CA 90404
[email protected]
(310) 392-2019
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
203 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:12:36 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Gail Blesi ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:52 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Hello,
Surely as a responsible public servant you want to help make the world a better place. If so, you and I share a common goal. I'm signing this petition in a gesture of hope and encouragement. Please reconsider and join the struggle to keep this precious planet one that is inhabitable for our children and other human beings.

Thank you.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Gail Blesi
1025 Diamond Ave
South Pasadena, CA 91030
[email protected]
(626) 799-2966
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
204 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:57:23 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Margarita Perez ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 10:10 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Margarita Perez
13859 Graber Ave
Sylmar, CA 91342
[email protected]
(818) 424-9721
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
205 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:12:52 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Braus ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:48 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Joseph Braus
1235 E. Elmwood Ave.

Burbank, CA 91501
[email protected]
(818) 953-6520
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
206 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:13:07 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Julia Sanford ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:45 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Julia Sanford
15418 Gault Street, Van Nuys, CA 91406
VAN NUYS, CA 91406
[email protected]
(818) 943-5481
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
207 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:42:43 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Hyesun Pou ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 8:10 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Please keep our kids and future kids safe!
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Hyesun Pou
801 e acacia Ave
Glendale , CA 91205
[email protected]
(818) 396-6181
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
208 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:13:38 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: David Levine ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
We need cleaner, greener option other then Grayson.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
David Levine
3612 Urquidez
Glendale , CA 91208
[email protected]
(917) 449-8943
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
209 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:43:08 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Shannen Nelson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 6:45 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I have children and I don?t want them exposed to this in our area.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Shannen Nelson
3005 pinewood lane
La crescenta , CA 91214
[email protected]
(818) 482-0436
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
210 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:14:12 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Hammermeister ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:42 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I live near Aliso Canyon.Need I say more.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Lisa Hammermeister
16456 Shamhart Drive
Granada Hills, CA 91344
[email protected]
(818) 366-2703
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
211 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:52:49 PM
Another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Paul Rickey ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 5:41 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Paul Rickey
3242 Pontiac st
Glendale, CA 91214
[email protected]
(818) 384-6636
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
212 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:14:33 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Nora Doyle ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:38 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Further investment in fossil fuels takes us backwards and exacerbates the effects of climate change that California is already feeling with year round wildfires and drought. Please reconsider your part in making climate change worse.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Nora Doyle
3838 Vantage Avenue
Studio City, CA 91604
[email protected]
(818) 508-6963
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
213 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:10:40 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Kim Waterson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 3:42 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
We don?t need more gas power plants. We need more renewable energy options .

Gas power plants pollute more and are dangerous Please reconsider your options I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Kim Waterson
361 S Devon Rd
Orange, CA 92868
[email protected]
(714) 357-2472
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
214 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:11:48 PM
This is another one.

Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Matt Karambelas ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 3:33 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Hey this is a hard no for me and my family
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Matt Karambelas
421 n Isabel st
Glendale , CA 91206
[email protected]
(213) 446-3088
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
215 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:15:01 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Heather Parker ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:38 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Heather Parker
3300 Foothill Blvd
La Crescenta, CA 91214
[email protected]
(678) 568-9009
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
216 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Thursday, March 3, 2022 11:30:32 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: ADAM BERNSTEIN ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:52 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,

ADAM BERNSTEIN
222 S Figueroa Street
Los Angeles , CA 90012
[email protected]
(443) 415-7476
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
217 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:44:10 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jiwon Park ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 10:27 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
Hello, I moved to Glendale from LA a few months ago for my kids? elementary school option - Keppel FLAG Korean program. I don?t know about the local politics yet, but so far Glendale has been a nice, clean, friendly neighborhood especially when we need it the most during the pandemic. But when I heard about the Grayson plan, i started wondering if we made a mistake moving here - Building a fossil fuel burning plant close to the residential schools (not only Keppel, but Toll and Hoover too), seems like a move that?s very very wrong, especially after more than two years of pandemic where we realize our health is the most important thing. I am horrified to just think my kids will breathe in the air that might have toxic chemicals, when they are at the school. Also. as a resident in Glendale, I would be terrified to take a walk in the neighborhood which had given us comfort so far. Please please please demand Glendale Water and Power do better. I don?t believe Grayson will do better.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jiwon Park
512 W. Stocker St. APT 9
Glendale, CA 91202
[email protected]
(310) 270-3137
218 of 296
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
219 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:02:39 AM
Another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Sherise Lee ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 9:44 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I oppose Grayson and want clean energy.

I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Sherise Lee
3612 Urquidez Ave
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(646) 245-8033
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
220 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:16:58 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth Anderson ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 8:39 AM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
I support Dan Brotmans proposal. And I do not support turning Grayson back on! I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Anderson
3220 Sparr Blvd
Glendale, CA 91208
[email protected]
(520) 991-8202
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
221 of 296
From: Adjemian, Aram
To: Ghazarian, Renia
Subject: FW: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:05:43 AM
This is another one
Aram Adjemian, CMC.

City Clerk ● City of Glendale ● City Clerk & Elections Services 613 E. Broadway, Rm 110 ● Glendale, CA 91206 ● (818) 548-2090 ● [email protected]

E-mail correspondence with the City of Glendale (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such may therefore be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message-----
From: Jaika Quirt ([email protected]) Sent You a Personal Message <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:23 PM
To: Adjemian, Aram <[email protected]>
Subject: The Grayson Decision on February 15 was very disappointing CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Aram Adjemian,
The future of my kids and their kids matter. We need to start now. There out to be alternatives that are more gentle to our earth and our bodies
I'm writing to express my disappointment that the Glendale City Council voted 3-2 to approve construction of new gas-fired units at the Grayson Power Plant.

Please reconsider the decision to purchase the gas engines.

They are an unnecessary waste of $260 million of taxpayer funds. This may be the last new gas-fired generation built in California, and runs counter to California?s efforts to reach 100% clean electricity by 2045.

Sincerely,
Jaika Quirt
1419 Norton Ave
Glendale, CA 91202
[email protected]
(818) 519-3949
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.

If you need more information, please contact David Eisenberg at Sierra Club at [email protected] or (415) 977-5500.
222 of 296
Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant Mitigation Measures 1 of 3 The Glendale Historical Society
4/25/2021

The environmental document prepared for the Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant must study and analyze historical resource impacts. The Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources.

The alternatives analysis component will be especially critical in this this document. It must evaluate the No Project alternative as well as a “reasonable range” of feasible alternatives that would retain the Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)).

There must be an essential nexus (i.e. connection) between the mitigation measure and a legitimate governmental interest. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). The mitigation measure must be "roughly proportional" to the impacts of the project. Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994). The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS) believes that the below-listed mitigation measures would be both connected to the expected loss of the Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant and are relational to the expected loss of that structure to the community. The addition of signage on San Fernando Road near the current location of the Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant and the future retention and display of components of equipment from the Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant shall be added to these mitigation measures.

Mitigation of impacts must lessen or eliminate the physical impact that the project will have on the historical resource. This is often accomplished through redesign of a project to eliminate objectionable or damaging aspects of the project. Relocation of a historical resource may constitute an adverse impact as well. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate the impact below a level of significance provided such that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing in the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)).

Although in most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays do not mitigate the physical impact on the environment caused by demolition or destruction of a historical resource (14 CCR Section 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if they do not mitigate to below a level of significance. In this context, recordation would serve a legitimate archival purpose.

Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure A (CR MM A)- Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documentation
If the preferred alternative is demolition, Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documentation shall be prepared for the Boiler Building, including the boilers and all additions, the turbine deck and turbine units 1-9. That documentation will include preparation of a written narrative, large format photography and drawings that meet the latest requirements in HAER History, Photography and Drawing Guidelines (at https://www.nps.gov/hdp/standards/haerguidelines.htm). Archival and electronic full copies of that completed documentation shall be submitted to the HAER program in accordance with the most recent edition of “Preparing HABS/HAER/HALS Documentation For Transmittal,” the Glendale Public Library and posted on the City’s main website for no less than 10 years. No fewer than a total of eight, full-size archivally printed and framed, full size (or larger) copies of those HAER drawings and six enlarged large format photographs, also archival printed and framed, shall 223 of 296
Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant Mitigation Measures 2 of 3 The Glendale Historical Society
4/25/2021

be displayed in the lobby or foyer of the of the replacement Operations and Maintenance building (or a more publicly accessible location subject to written approval to The Glendale Historical Society).

That HAER documentation, as described, shall be complete and accepted by the HAER program before any demolition or dismantling of the Boiler Building, its contents, the turbine deck or turbines 1-8 can commence.

If the City of Glendale maintained a comprehensive, up-to-date, historic resources survey of City-Owned Properties, the Grayson Steam-Electric Power Plant would previously have been identified as a historical resource and there would be no need for the years of disagreement on that important subject. Based on the absence of such a survey, a comprehensive, intensive survey is proposed as a mitigation measure to avoid these situations in the future.

As directed in the National Register Bulletin “Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning,”
The success of planning a community survey, as well as conducting it and using the results, will depend on a broad base of local interest and involvement. Vital support for the survey, and for historic preservation in general, can be generated if a carefully planned campaign is mounted to involve the public and obtain their participation. Such a campaign can also identify valuable local sources of information and special expertise. Public involvement should begin at the earliest stages of survey planning.

CR MM B- Historic Resources Survey of City-Owned Properties The City shall prepare or cause to be prepared comprehensive Historic Resources Survey of (all) City- Owned Properties (Survey) with improvements constructed before 1990, unless the property has previously been evaluated (with a written record of that evaluation) within the past five years or are expected to be evaluated in the planned East-West Survey. All survey work shall conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation, which include Standards for Evaluation, Identification, and Registration. The survey shall be prepared in accordance with “National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning” and the California Office of Historic Preservation’s latest guidance. The Survey shall commence within 90 days of the adoption of the environmental clearance document for the Proposed Grayson Power Plant Repowering Project. The survey shall be completed within one-calendar year, be subject to a draft and final survey review and recommendation by the City’s Historic Preservation Commission and adoption by City Council.

The resulting survey shall include, at minimum:

A Summary, enumerating the total number of surveyed resources and districts with levels of significance.

A Project Description, that clearly describes the purposes of the survey, sources of funding, its overall parameters, a description and map of the survey area and property types.

A Summary of Previous Identification Efforts that clearly describes any previous survey of identification efforts, local designations, National and California Register listings and determinations of eligibility, California Historic Landmarks and California Points of Historic 224 of 296
Grayson Electric-Steam Power Plant Mitigation Measures 3 of 3 The Glendale Historical Society
4/25/2021

Interest listings and designations and any other related historic preservation planning efforts. It shall include and describe the contents of a current, records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University Fullerton and provide the final survey and all known Glendale surveys to the Information Canter upon completion, in accordance with the Information Center’s requirement.

A Context Statement prepared in compliance with The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning, “Standard I. Preservation Planning Establishes Historic Contexts,” “Standard II. Preservation Planning Uses Historic Contexts To Develop Goals and Priorities for the Identification, Evaluation, Registration and Treatment of Historic Properties” and the California Office of Historic Preservation-prepared “Writing Historic Contexts” guidance. The Context Statement shall establish clear registration requirements for eligibility.

A clear Methodology section that describes field work techniques and research methods used to conduct the survey, a description of how historic districts are identified in the survey, references to previous surveys, and methodology for re-survey completed as part of this project. It will clearly describe efforts made to contact and involve members of the community and organizations with particular interests in historic properties.

Recommendations for future preservation activities, including: potential updates and/or amendments to existing National, California and Glendale Register designations, as applicable; designation recommendations for potential local historic districts, as applicable; and potential economic development, heritage tourism, and other preservation planning activities; Survey results shall enumerate the total number of surveyed resources in appropriate categories, tables listing the property types and architectural styles identified, as well as narrative defining the results, with information regarding the levels of integrity and condition of resources, describes character-defining features, past and current development trends.

Appendix 1: Two-page DPR 523 series forms for each City-owned property unless the property is vacant or a paved parking lot which shall be noted in the survey results tables by Los Angeles County Assessor’s Parcel Identification Numbers and address (where assigned). The DPRs shall be fully completed in accordance with the latest edition of the OHP-prepared “Instructions For Recording Historical Resources.” They shall include whether or not the evaluation is an update, assign California Register Status Codes and describe other listings in the header blocks and include at least one clear digital photograph and a sketch map. If a property is California Register Status Code 1-6L, it shall include a complete architectural description, construction history, related features and under significance, describe why the resource is significant within a the relevant historic context and identify character-defining features.

Appendix 2: A survey map that delineates the survey area with all previously identified properties including local landmarks and historic districts and the results of the City owner- Properties Survey.

The results of the final or adopted survey shall be provided to the Office of Historic Preservation, submitted in the specified formats to the Information Center and the result, including the DPR series 523 forms shall be posted, by property in the City’s Glendale Information Property Portal or its successors and in its entirely on the City’s website until it is updated by a subsequent survey, within no more than 90 days of its substantial completion or adoption. 225 of 296
of 12
State of California • Natural Resources Agency Gavin Newsom, Governor December 3, 2020 Reference Number: FRA_2017_0516_001 Submitted Via Electronic Mail
Brett Rushing
Cultural Resources Program Manager
California High-Speed Rail Authority
770 L Street, Suite 620
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: High-Speed Rail Program, Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section, Additional Information and Request for Review and Concurrence on Revised National Register of Historic Places Determination of Eligibility for Grayson Steam-Electric Generating Station (Grayson Power Plant) Dear Mr. Rushing:

The California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) is continuing consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section of the High-Speed Rail (HSR) Project. This consultation is undertaken in accordance with the Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Railroad Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the California High-Speed Rail Authority (PA 2011). In support of this consultation, the authority has provided following documentation:

Updated California Department of Parks and Recreation Site Record Form (DPR 523) for Grayson Power Plant, 2015 (revised 2017)
City of Glendale Community Development Department Comment Letter on the California High-Speed Rail Program Burbank to Los Angeles Project Section Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, August 31, 2020
In a letter dated May 2, 2019, SHPO concurred that the Grayson Power Plant was eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criteria A at the local level of significance for its association with power generation in Glendale. Subsequently, new information on the history of the Grayson Power Plant has come to light: a comprehensive 2018 evaluation undertaken for an Environmental Impact Report by Stantec Consulting Services for the City of Glendale found that the property did not retain

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer
1725 23rd Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95816-7100 Telephone: (916) 445-7000 FAX: (916) 445-7053 [email protected] www.ohp.parks.ca.gov
Lisa Ann L. Mangat, Director
226 of 296
of 22
sufficient integrity to considered eligible for listing on the NRHP under all criteria. Having considered this information, the Authority agrees with the conclusions with the 2018 evaluation and request SHPO concurrence with the revised determination of eligibility.

Having reviewed your submittal, SHPO concurs that the Grayson Power Plant is ineligible for listing on the NRHP under all criteria for the reasons outlined in the revised DPR 523 form.

If you have any questions, please contact State Historian Tristan Tozer at (916) 445-7027 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Julianne Polanco
State Historic Preservation Officer
227 of 296

P.O. Box 4173 Glendale CA 91202
www.GlendaleHistorical.org
The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS) advocates for the preservation of important Glendale landmarks, supports maintaining the historic character of Glendale’s neighborhoods, educates the public about and engages the community in celebrating and preserving Glendale’s history and architectural heritage, and operates the Doctors House Museum. TGHS is a tax-exempt, not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization, and donations to TGHS are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.

November 19, 2017

Mr. Erik Krause
Interim Deputy Director of Community Development
City of Glendale Community Development Department
633 E Broadway, Room 103
Glendale CA 91206

RE: Comments on Proposed Grayson Repowering Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Dear Mr. Krause:

On behalf of the Board of Directors of The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS), I would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Proposed Grayson Repowering Project. Established in 1979, TGHS is a non-profit organization with more than 700 members dedicated to the preservation of Glendale’s history and architectural heritage through advocacy and education.

We disagree with the findings that the Grayson Steam Electric Power Plant is not a historical resource as defined in CEQA. We believe that the consultant’s assessment of historic significance is fundamentally flawed and we question whether the City’s qualified experts have critically reviewed the built environment or archaeological findings. TGHS believes that the Grayson Steam Electric Power Plant may be eligible for listing in the National Register and that it is eligible for listing in the California and Glendale Registers for its associative as well as for its design and engineering significance. We also believe the DEIR is flawed in other important ways described in detail below.

Tribal Cultural Resources
We note that the “Tribal Cultural Resources” chapter of the DEIR is incorrectly titled among other more deficiencies. The inaccurate title demonstrates a lack of basic understanding of the intent of the section and the task by preparers and reviewers. The purpose of what is normally called a Cultural Resources chapter in an EIR is to identify and evaluate the potential for a project to effect paleontological, archaeological and historical resources. Resources of concern include fossils, prehistoric and historic artifacts, burials, sites of religious or cultural significance to Native American groups and historical resources.
228 of 296

Page 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting