A G E N D A
GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL
(STAFF ACCESS ONLY) COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U- verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live , on YouTube.com/myglendale , and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices using a free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at glendaleca.gov/agendas . Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. DVDs of the proceedings are available for purchase in the City Clerk's Office.
If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.
PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.
Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (818) 548-2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please specify the language for which you require translation. The exclusive use of City provided interpreters is not required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.
APRIL 5, 2022 AT 6:00 PM
To help slow the transmission of COVID-19, and protect the health and safety of the community, City Council, as well as Board & Commission meetings, will continue to be closed to the public for in-person attendance.
The public is encouraged to watch and participate from the safety of their homes to practice social distancing. Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U-verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live , on YouTube.com/myglendale , and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices using a free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu.
For public comments and questions during the meeting, call (818) 937-8100. Public comments on a specific agenda item will be taken when that agenda item is discussed. 1 TYPED 4/5/2022 3:05:53 PM
04 05 22
CC
REVISED
- Item 4c was added
ROLL CALL
1. CLOSED SESSION – 1:00 PM (To Commence at 3:00 PM )
a. Conference with real property negotiators: Property location – Real property generally located at the terminus of New York Avenue near Park Vista Drive, commonly referred to as “Mountain Oaks.” Negotiating parties: F.E. & M. Inc.
Employee’s Defined Contribution Plan Trust dated July 10, 1984. Agency negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, John Takhtalian, Silvio Lanzas, Jason Bradford, Christine Powers and Onnig Bulanikian. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms for the acquisition of property
b. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: F.E. & M. Inc. Employee’s Defined Contribution Plan Trust dated July 10, 1984 v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. BS16989
c. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: Sierra Club v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 22STCP00983
d. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation: Glendale Residents Against Environmental Destruction v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 22STCP01021 e. Public Employment – Attorneys
f. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation: Chavira v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 21STCV44569
g. Conference with real property negotiators: Property location – 216 N. Brand Blvd. (Alex Theatre). Negotiating parties: SAS Entertainment. Agency negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, John Takhtalian, Jason Bradford, Bradley Calvert, and Tamar Sadd.
Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms for the lease of property
2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Devine
b. Invocation: Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 5, 2022 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on March 30, 2022 on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.
3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, April 12, 2022 b. Outgoing Mayor’s Comments
c. Selection of a New Mayor
d. New Mayor’s Comments
4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
2 TYPED 4/5/2022 3:05:53 PM
04 05 22
CC
a. Police Department, re: Public/Private Partnership for Installation of Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology
1. Motion authorizing the Glendale Police Department to establish public/private partnerships with organizations, associations, businesses, and residents to install ALPR technology
b. Fire Department, re: Regarding Renewal of a Weed Abatement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner
1. Resolution for a Weed Abatement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner
c. City Attorney, re: Consideration of a Resolution to allow the City Council and all City legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely pursuant to the Brown Act as amended by A.B. 361
1. Resolution authorizing the continuance of remote teleconference meetings of the City’s legislative bodies for a period of an additional 30 days in accordance with A.B. 361
5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)
7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
8. ACTION ITEMS
a. Community Services and Parks, re: Selection of Dog Park site and Direction on design consultant
1. Motion approving City Parking Lot 11 as the location for a Dog Park in Glendale and directing staff to engage the services of a design consultant to prepare design alternatives and cost estimates
2. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $350,000 from the Parks Mitigation Fee fund balance to the Dog Park Project to begin designing the park
9. HEARINGS
10. REPORTS - INFORMATION
11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision. The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.
13. NEW BUSINESS
14. ADJOURNMENT
3 TYPED 4/5/2022 3:05:53 PM
04 05 22
CC
1 CITY OF GLENDALE
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
DATE: April 4, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Dorine Martirosian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Mayor Selection and Housing Authority Chair Selection Process
This Memorandum provides a summary of the Mayoral and Housing Authority Chair selection process, which was adopted by the City Council in March 2021 and its applicability to the selection of Mayor and Housing Authority Chair in 2022.
BACKGROUND
On March 30, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5963 amending Glendale Municipal Code (GMC) Section 2.04.020 relating to the Mayoral selection process, and the Housing Authority adopted Resolution No. H-513 amending Section 201 – Designation of Officers - of the Housing Authority Bylaws, which sets forth the selection process for the Housing Authority Chair.
Selection of Mayor:
Under Section 2.04.020, the new Mayor shall be appointed during the first regular meeting of the City Council which occurs after the first Monday in April of each year, which is April 5, 2022 this year.
GMC Section 2.04.020(B) sets forth an order of precedence for the selection of the Mayor:
1. The Councilmember with the longest, continuous uninterrupted service on the Council since last serving as Mayor and who is not serving as the Mayor at the time of the selection.
2. If there is a tie between Councilmembers, then precedence is given to the Councilmember who received the most votes in that Councilmember’s most recent election if the tied Councilmembers were elected in the same election or the Councilmember who received the highest percentage of votes received in each Councilmember’s elections if the tied Councilmembers were elected at different elections, with further precedence given to a Councilmember who has not previously served as Mayor.
3. By majority vote of the City Council.
4 of 38
2 GMC Section 2.04.20, subdivisions (C) through (F) set forth provisions applicable to instances:
where a Councilmember’s term will expire in the same year that the Mayor’s term would also expire if said Councilmember was selected as Mayor, or within 180 days after the date of the selection of the Mayor – in which cases said Councilmember shall not be selected Mayor; where a Councilmember was the Mayor for the immediately preceding term (unless all other Councilmembers decline to serve); where a Councilmember who is next in line is unable or unwilling to serve as Mayor; where a Councilmember vacates, or is removed from their Council position.
Lastly, GMC Section 2.04.020(G) and (H) allow the Council to deviate from the requirements of the above procedure if the Councilmember next in line to be appointed Mayor was appointed to Council for the purposes of filling a vacancy (G), and instances where the City Council, in its discretion, makes a determination that it is in the best interest of the City to make another selection.
As discussed previously, under the prescribed procedure above, Councilmember Kassakhian is next in line to be appointed Mayor on April 5, 2022. He has served a longer period of uninterrupted service on Council without serving as Mayor than Councilmembers Agajanian, Devine and Najarian
1, and has the same amount of service as Councilmember Brotman. Under GMC Section 2.04.020(B)(2), Councilmember Kassakhian has precedence over Councilmember Brotman because he received more votes than Councilmember Brotman when they were both elected to Council in March 2020. Also, Councilmember Brotman is not eligible to be selected Mayor for the upcoming mayoral term since his current Council term expires within 180 days after the mayoral selection date.
Selection of Housing Authority Chair:
Pursuant to Section 201 of Housing Authority Bylaws, as amended by Resolution No. H-513, the Housing Authority Chair is selected at the first regular meeting of the Housing Authority after the City Council selects the Mayor. The first regular meeting of the Housing Authority after April 5, 2022 will be April 19, 2022. Under Section 201(A) of the Bylaws, the Authority “shall select and appoint as Authority Chair the Glendale City Council member who is qualified to serve as Mayor as the upcoming term” pursuant to the GMC provisions dealing with the mayoral rotation.
Section 201(B) contains provisions addressing instances where the Chair vacates, or is removed, at which time, the Housing Authority may fill said vacancy by selecting the next qualified Authority Member. Lastly, Section 201(C) allows the Housing Authority, in the best interest of the City and the Housing Authority, to select the Chair by majority vote where and if warranted. Under this procedure, Councilmember and Housing Authority member Brotman should be selected as the next Chair of the Housing Authority on April 19, 2022.
CONCLUSION
Under GMC Section 2.04.020, Councilmember Kassakhian should be appointed Mayor on April 5, 2022. Under Resolution No. H-513, Councilmember and Housing Authority Member Brotman should be appointed Chair of the Housing Authority on April 19, 2022.
1 Councilmembers Kassakhian and Brotman were sworn in on March 31, 2020 and Councilmember Najarian’s most recent term as Mayor ended on April 13, 2020. Thus, Councilmembers Kassakhian and Brotman have longer periods of uninterrupted service without being Mayor. 5 of 38
3 Under Roberts Rules of Order, selection and appointment of Mayor and Housing Authority Chair will still require a motion (second not necessary) from a member of each body during the items agendized for the selections.
cc: Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
6 of 38
4a
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Public/Private Partnership for Installation of Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology
1. Motion authorizing the Glendale Police Department to establish public/private partnerships with organizations, associations, businesses, and residents to install ALPR technology.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent
Approved for April 5, 2022 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Glendale Police Department has utilized ALPR technology for several years. ALPR technology captures and stores digital images of license plates and vehicles, which can be accessed by authorized persons for legitimate purposes. The use of ALPR technology has enhanced the community’s safety by providing the Police Department with access to relevant information regarding crimes that are being investigated. The development of a partnership program with organizations, associations, businesses, and residents within the City will add another level of safety, help prevent crime, and increase crime clearance rates in the community.
COUNCIL PRIORITIES
The proposed partnership promotes the following City Council priority:
Safe & Healthy Community: The Police Department is committed to collaborating with the public to create a safe community for all to enjoy. Establishing a partnership between the Glendale Police Department and organizations, associations, businesses, and residents for the deployment of ALPR technology enhances community safety.
7 of 38
24 a
3 0
6 7
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the Police Department to establish a public/private partnership with organizations, associations, businesses, and residents to use ALPR technology for the purpose of enhancing community safety, preventing crime, and increasing crime clearance rates.
BACKGROUND
The Glendale Police Department has operated ALPR technology for over a decade. Over the last year, several community members have expressed an interest in partnering with the Police Department in the deployment and management of ALPR technology.
Community members desire to have this technology in their neighborhoods as a crime deterrent, to increase community safety and as a means to develop investigative leads in the event a crime occurs. The Police Department believes a partnership with community members would be beneficial for overall public safety within the City.
ANALYSIS
Various organizations, associations, businesses, and residents have contacted staff to express their interest in a proposed public/private collaborative crime-solving effort. The Glendale Police Department seeks to provide a public/private partnership opportunity with any resident, association, neighborhood, or business interested in purchasing ALPR technology.
Under this proposed partnership, community members may make a request to the Glendale Police Department for the deployment of ALPR technology and agree to pay for the costs associated with acquisition and installation. The general location of the technology would be mutually agreed upon by the Police Department and the community members. The Police Department would obtain the hardware and be responsible for determining the final site selection and installation. The Police Department would retain all rights related to the ALPR technology, including the right to use and access the data for official use only. Community members would not have the right to use or access any information or data gathered. In the event a system is operated by a private entity that allows the Police Department access to ALPR data, the Police Department's access and use would be governed by existing policy.
Pursuant to state law and Department policy, ALPR data is closely safeguarded and protected. Data shall only be used for official law enforcement purposes and subject to internal audit. The Glendale Police Department’s ALPR policy is available on the Police Department’s website.
8 of 38
34 a
3 0
6 7
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The following community members have expressed an interest in this collaborative crime solving effort:
College Hills Association
Royal Canyon Property Owner’s Association
Chevy Oaks Homeowners Association
Chevy Chase Estates Association
Adams Hills Neighborhood Association
Fair Oaks Homeowners Association
Whiting Woods Property Owners Inc.
Glenwood Oaks
Americana at Brand
Glendale Galleria
Individual Community Members
In order to reach community members, the Police Department utilized the following methods:
Neighborhood Watch Meetings
Neighborhood Watch Block Captain Meetings
Property Owner’s Association Meetings
Community Academy
Community Gatherings and Events i.e. Coffee with a Cop, Shields on the Fields, National Night Out
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to create the partnership as the ALPR hardware and subscriptions would be paid for by community members.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
There is no possibility that the proposed public/private partnership may have a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3)).
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
9 of 38
44 a
3 0
6 7
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Adopt the motion as requested by the Police Department.
Alternative 2: Not adopt the motion.
Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:
Alex Krikorian, Lieutenant
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Not applicable.
10 of 38
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ______________, seconded by Council Member ________________, that the City Council hereby authorizes the Glendale Police Department to establish public/private partnerships with organizations, associations, businesses, and residents to install Automated License Plate Recognition technology as more particularly discussed in the report to the City Council dated April 5, 2022.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
11 of 38
4b
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Regarding Renewal of a Weed Abatement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner
1. Resolution for a Weed Abatement Services Agreement with the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 5, 2022 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendale currently has a 5-year agreement with the County to provide weed abatement services for unimproved, vacant parcels in the High Fire Hazard Areas of the City. Under this agreement, the County can work on behalf of the City to abate weeds and brush found to be a fire hazard. The current agreement is set to expire in June of this year
This resolution will renew the agreement for weed abatement services for another 5-years and, if renewed, will expire in June of 2027.
12 of 38
24 b
3 2
0 1
COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Safe and Healthy Community: Inspecting for, and removing noxious weeds that present an actual or potential fire hazard within 100 feet of a structure will allow the City to be more prepared to prevent a destructive wildfire.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve the resolution to extend the Weed Abatement Services Agreement with the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner for another 5 years.
BACKGROUND
The City of Glendale has maintained an agreement with the County of Los Angeles for weed abatement services inside the City of Glendale since 1977. The agreement was last renewed in 2017 and will expire on June 30, 2022.
Under the agreement, the County, working closely with the City, abates weeds and brush found to be a public nuisance or fire hazard. The costs of the abatement become a lien against properties that are abated. The agreement is an important component of our Vegetation Management Program that is designed to prevent brush fires.
The services provided by the County have proved to be an invaluable component of the City's overall hazard abatement program. Vegetation found to be a public nuisance is abated by the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner and all costs related to abatement are charged to the property owner.
The annual abatement process begins in December of the preceding year when the Commissioner prepares a draft Declaration List of all properties containing noxious weeds considered to be a public nuisance. The list is reviewed by County and City staff to make any necessary corrections and have a final list prepared. Notification letters are printed in January from the declaration list and mailed the first Monday in February.
Following City Council action declaring the weeds a hazard and public nuisance, and a public hearing for noticed property owners, the Commissioner is empowered to abate the weeds declared a public nuisance and place the cost of doing so as a lien against the property abated.
All unimproved parcels in the city are inspected annually and placed on the list if they present an actual or potential fire hazard that is within 100 feet of a structure. This year's notice list includes over 600 properties. The Fire Department works with the Commissioner to identify areas in the city that should be given priority attention for abatement. County abatement activities follow current city clearance requirements unless directed otherwise by the Fire Department.
The proposed agreement is renewable for successive periods not to exceed fire (5) years each. Renewal of the agreement is being considered at this time so as not to interrupt the notification and abatement process for 2022.
13 of 38
34 b
3 2
0 1
ANALYSIS
N/A
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The stakeholders include the owners of the vacant, unimproved properties identified by the City of Glendale and the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner. A notice is mailed to the property owners annually informing them of the program.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
N/A
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Private hazard abatement vendors may be contracted with by the City of Glendale to provide· abatement services. This alternative would require the City to assume the lead role in key program tasks including notification, inspection and cost recovery, thereby increasing the direct cost for the City.
Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternate not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:
Foster McLean, Assistant Fire Marshal
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit #1: Glendale_5yrAgreement-2027
Exhibit #2: Renewal Letter Glendale Contract
Exhibit #3: GlendaleRenewal_Letter2022_Signed
14 of 38
C:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\GLENDALE\TEMP\CC_04052022_RESOLUTION_4B1.PDF RESOLUTION NO.______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GLENDALE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE
WEED ABATEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES
WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles (hereinafter “County’) is desirous of entering into a five-year agreement with the City of Glendale (hereinafter “City”) whereby the County will abate weeds on vacant lots within the City at no costs to the City; and WHEREAS, the City is desirous of entering into said contract with the County;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE;
SECTION 1.That the City is authorized to enter into a Weed Abatement agreement with the County whereby the County is authorized to abate weeds on vacant lots, pursuant to the procedures established by State law, within the City.
SECTION 2.That the agreement will run from July 1, 2022 June 30, 2027 unless terminated by either the County of the City prior to June 30, 2027.
SECTION 3.That the City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement.
Passed by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _________ day of ___________, 2017.
___________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
///
///
///
15 of 38
C:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\GLENDALE\TEMP\CC_04052022_RESOLUTION_4B1.PDF
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, ARAM ADJEMIAN, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No.____________ was passed by Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _______ , 2022, and that the same was passed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
16 of 38
WEED ABATEMENT SERVICE
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), entered into this ____ day of ___________, 2022, is made by and between the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as the “County”, and the City of Glendale, hereinafter referred to as the “City”.
RECITALS:
(a) The City is desirous of contracting with the County for the performance of weed abatement functions within its boundaries on unimproved and designated improved properties by the County, acting through its Department of Agricultural Commissioner/Weights and Measures. (b) The County is agreeable to rendering such weed abatement services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
(c) Such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of Section 56 ½ of the Charter of the County of Los Angeles and California Government Code (Government Code) section 51301.
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The County agrees to provide weed abatement services within the corporate limits of the City in accordance with the provisions of Government Code sections 39560 through 39588.
Such services shall encompass the weed abatement duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of, and customarily rendered by, the County and the statutes of the State of California.
The level of service shall be the same basic level of weed abatement service that is currently, and shall be hereinafter during the term of this Agreement, provided by the County in the unincorporated areas of the County of Los Angeles. The County shall have the discretion to terminate services on parcels in tax default.
17 of 38
The rendition of such services, the standard of performance, control of personnel so employed and other matters incidental to the performance of such services, shall remain at the discretion of the County.
The standard for hazardous vegetation clearance shall be equivalent to that detailed within the Los Angeles County Fire Code, sections 325.2.1 and 325.2.2, and this standard being the same which currently applies in the unincorporated areas of the County of Los Angeles unless some other standard is requested by the City in writing.
2. To facilitate the performance of said functions, it is hereby agreed that the County shall have full cooperation and assistance from the City Council and other City officers, agents, and employees.
3. For the purpose of performing said functions, the County shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, and supplies to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder.
4. No City Employee as such shall be, or considered to be, an employee of the County, and no person employed by the County hereunder shall be granted any City pension, civil service, or any status or right.
For the purpose of performing such services and functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof where necessary, every County officer and employee engaged in the performance of any service hereunder shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of said City while performing services for said City, which services are within the scope of this Agreement and are purely municipal functions.
5. The City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation to any County personnel performing services hereunder for the County, or any liability other than that provided for in this Agreement. 18 of 38
Except as herein otherwise specified, the City shall not be liable for compensation and/or indemnification to any County employee for any injury or sickness arising out of that person’s employment.
6. The parties hereto have executed an Assumption of Liability Agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and/or a Joint Indemnity Agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 8, 1991. Whichever of these documents the City has signed later in time is currently in effect and is hereby made a part of and incorporated into this Agreement as if set out in full herein. In the event that the Board of Supervisors later approves a revised Joint Indemnity Agreement and the City executes the revised Joint Indemnity Agreement, the subsequent Joint Indemnity Agreement as of its effective date shall supersede the Assumption of Liability and/or Joint Indemnity Agreement previously in effect between the parties hereto.
The City understands and agrees that the fire protection indemnity provided in Government Code sections 850 and 850.2 applies to the County for work pursuant to this Agreement.
7. Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this Agreement shall be effective commencing July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2027.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph hereinbefore set forth, the City may terminate this Agreement as of the thirty-first day of December of any year upon notice in writing to the County on or before September 30 of the same year. The County may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason upon thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City.
8. The City, acting through its City Council, will perform the necessary functions required of the legislative body referred to in Government Code section 39560 through 39588, as they relate to the execution of this Agreement.
9. If the City fails to adopt a resolution declaring that weeds upon parcels of property located within the City are a public nuisance pursuant to Government Code section 39561, then 19 of 38
the County shall have no obligation to carry out its duties under this Agreement until such year that the City does adopt such resolution, unless the City’s failure occurs in the final year of this Agreement, which shall mean the Agreement terminates.
10. It is the intent of this Agreement that the Agricultural Commissioner/Director of Weights and Measures of the County shall constitute the public officer designated by the City Council to perform the duties imposed by Government Code section 39560(a), and that the City Council of said City shall perform the duties of the legislative body as set forth in said section.
11. For and in consideration of the rendition of the foregoing services by the County, the City agrees that the costs of abating such weeds shall be assessed in the manner set forth in Government Code sections 39573 to 39585, and that upon collection of such assessments, they will be paid over to the County.
12. Each parcel, except tax-exempt parcels, upon which weeds, brush or rubbish are declared to be a public nuisance pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Agreement shall be assessed the current County Board of Supervisors approved inspection fee, whether or not the County determines it is necessary to perform abatement work upon the parcel.
13. The parties hereto contemplate that the services of the County are limited to abatement of weeds, brush and rubbish, and agree that the County will not perform any other type of service or additional work of any kind.
14. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the County and the City for weed abatement services. This Agreement may not be modified except by formal written amendment executed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto. 20 of 38
15. Notices regarding this Agreement shall be addressed as follows:
COUNTY:
Adrian Zavala
Deputy Director
Los Angeles County Department of Agricultural Commissioner/ Weights and Measures
12300 Lower Azusa Road
Arcadia, California 91006-5872
CITY:
Aram Adjemian
Office of the City Clerk
City of Glendale
613 East Broadway
Glendale, California 91206
21 of 38
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the CITY OF GLENDALE, by motion duly adopted by its City Council, caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk, and the County of Los Angeles, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by the Chair of said Board and seal of said Board to be affixed thereto and attested by the Clerk of the Board, the day, month, and year first above written.
CITY OF GLENDALE
By
Mayor
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By
Chair, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
By
City Clerk
CELIA ZAVALA, Executive Officer
Executive Office of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Los Angeles
By
Deputy
APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY COUNTY COUNSEL:
RODRIGO A. CASTRO-SILVA
By
Brian T. Chu
Principal Deputy County Counsel
22 of 38
Kurt E. Floren
Agricultural Commissioner
Director of Weights and Measures
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Department of
Agricultural Commissioner/
Weights and Measures
12300 Lower Azusa Road
Arcadia, CA 91006-5872
http://acwm.lacounty.gov
Protecting Consumers
and the Environment
Since 1881
Protecting Consumers and the Environment Since 1881
To Enrich Lives Through Effective and Caring Service
March 9, 2022
City of Glendale
Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
613 East Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206
Dear City Clerk:
RENEWAL OF FIVE YEAR WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
The Weed Abatement Agreement (Agreement) between your City and the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner/Weights and Measures Department expires on June 30, 2022. Enclosed is the Renewal Agreement for the term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2027. It is our belief that the County’s Weed Abatement program continues to be of significant mutual benefit to the County and the participating city.
We would appreciate your review and your Council’s approval of the Agreement on or before April 15, 2022. This will allow us sufficient time to recommend approval by the Board of Supervisors before the current Agreement expires.
Please return e-signed copies of the Agreement to:
Myrna Madrid, Staff Assistant III
Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner/Weights & Measures Department Weed Hazard and Pest Management Bureau
12300 Lower Azusa Road
Arcadia, CA 91006-5872
If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to call our office at (626) 575-5487.
Sincerely,
ADRIAN ZAVALA
Deputy Director/Bureau Chief
Weed Hazard and Integrated Pest Management Bureau
MYRNA MADRID
Staff Assistant III
Weed Hazard and Pest Management Bureau
AZ:mm
23 of 38
24 of 38
4c
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Consideration of a Resolution to allow the City Council and all City legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely pursuant to the Brown Act as amended by A.B. 361.
1. Resolution authorizing the continuance of remote teleconference meetings of the City’s legislative bodies for a period of an additional 30 days in accordance with A.B. 361.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for April 5, 2022 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Governor signed A.B. 361 which permits continued remote teleconference meetings during a declared state of emergency, provided the local agency makes specified findings and adheres to the procedural safeguards specified in the law. The Council has adopted resolution to allow continued remote meetings under A.B. 361 for a period of 30 days. A resolution is presented for Council consideration to authorize continued remote teleconference meetings for an additional 30 days.
COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Informed and Engaged Community – Allowing continued remote teleconference meetings of the City’s legislative bodies, including live public participation, during the current state of emergency helps to ensure an informed and engaged community.
Safe & Health Community – Allowing continued remote teleconference meetings of the City’s legislative bodies promotes social distancing recommended by local health authorities during the pandemic.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution allowing continued remote teleconference meetings of the City’s legislative bodies, including live public participation, 25 of 38
24 c
2 8
6 8
in accordance with A.B. 361.
BACKGROUND
Since March of 2020, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Council and all boards and commissions have been meeting remotely pursuant to the Governor's Executive Order N-29-20, which suspended certain teleconference meeting requirements of the Brown Act. On June 11, 2021, the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, which rescinds these suspensions effective September 30, 2021. In recognition of the fact that the pandemic is ongoing, on September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361, which amends the Brown Act and authorizes teleconferenced public meetings at remote locations under a state of emergency declared by the Governor under the Emergency Services Act. The Council adopted resolutions on October 19, 2021, November 16 2021, December 14, 2021, January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022, and March 8, 2022 allowing continued remote teleconference meetings under A.B. 361 for a period of 30 days.
ANALYSIS
AB 361 allows local agencies to continue having remote teleconference meetings when the Governor has declared and a state of emergency, if the local agency can make certain findings and complies with several procedural safeguards to protect public participation during a remote meeting. The public must have the ability to address the legislative body directly, and must be given information on how to address the body. The public must be provided either a call-in or internet-based service option. The body must stop the meeting if the call-in or internet-based option fails. The legislative body cannot require that public comments be submitted in advance (although this can be provided as an option).
Speakers cannot be required to pre-register (except as required by an independent call- in or internet platform). Members of the public must be given a reasonable time to register to provide public comment.
Accordingly, the Council adopted resolutions on October 19, 2021, November 16, 2021 December 14, 2021, January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022 and March 8, 2022 to authorize the Council and all boards, commissions, and committees, including ad hoc committees subject to the Brown Act, to continue to be able to meet remotely during the current declared state of emergency for a period of 30 days. In adopting the resolutions, the Council found that state or local health measures continue to promote social distancing by state or local officials. With continued public health recommendations of social distancing and the emergence of the BA.2 subvariant of the Omicron variant, there is a need to continue remote teleconference meetings under AB 361. To continue remote teleconference meetings, the Council must confirm the circumstances of the state of emergency and make the required findings every 30 days. A proposed resolution is presented for Council consideration. The City anticipates utilizing the next 30-day period to transition to in person meetings by the time the resolution expires on May 5, 2022.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.
26 of 38
34 c
2 8
6 8
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is exempt from CEQA. It is not a project and there is no reasonable likelihood that compliance with AB 361 will result in any significant impacts to the environment.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES
1.The Council can adopt the Resolution so that the Council and the City’s boards and commissions can continue to hold remote teleconference meetings, consistent with AB 361.
2.The Council could choose not to adopt the Resolution but the Council and City boards and commissions would have to return to in-person meetings commencing on April 8, 2022.
3.The Council could select an alternative not identified by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:
Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
None.
27 of 38
1 C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\CC_04052022_Resolution_4c1.pdf RESOLUTION NO. ___________
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING CONTINUED REMOTE TELECONFERENCE
MEETINGS OF ALL CITY OF GLENDALE LEGISLATIVE BODIES
FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTY DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AB 361 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Glendale is committed to preserving and fostering public access and participation in meetings of the Council, and all City of Glendale “legislative bodies” as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code §§ 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend and participate as the bodies conduct the public’s business; and
WHEREAS, the Brown Act, as amended by Assembly Bill No. 361 (“AB 361”), makes special provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings when the Governor has declared a state of emergency pursuant to Government Code section 8625, and either state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or the state of emergency directly impacts the ability of legislative body members to meet safely in person; and
WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City of Glendale. Specifically, on March 4, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued a Proclamation of a State of Emergency with regard to the COVID-19 pandemic (“State of Emergency”). Los Angeles County Health Officer has issued numerous Health Orders regarding safety protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic, most recently dated September 28, 2021.
Pasadena’s Health Officer has also issued numerous Health Orders regarding safety protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic, including a June 14, 2021 Order To Comply With California Department Of Public Health Guidance For The Use Of Face Coverings 28 of 38
2 C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\CC_04052022_Resolution_4c1.pdf And Select Sector Guidance And Public Health Protocols (which, among other orders, requires physical distancing of at least 6 feet), a July 21, 2021 Order For Wearing Of Face Masks In Public Settings (requiring face masks be worn, regardless of vaccination status, in all indoor public settings) and a . These latest orders were made necessary by the rise in the more contagious and easily spread Delta variant of the COVID-19 virus throughout the nation, and specifically in the Los Angeles County region. State and local health orders also continue to promote social distancing and outdoor activity to the extent feasible; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the current situation with regard to COVID-19, and particularly the Omicron variant (and BA.2 subvariant), is causing, and will continue to cause, risks to the safety of persons within the City of Glendale and finds that the Council and all City of Glendale legislative bodies, including the Council, Successor Agency, Housing Authority, all boards, commissions and committees, and all legislative bodies established by the Council shall conduct their meetings with remote participation in the manner authorized by Government Code § 54953(e), and such legislative bodies shall comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in Government Code § 54953(e)(2);
WHEREAS, the Council adopted resolutions on October 19, 2021, November 16, 2021, December 14, 2021 January 11, 2022, February 8, 2022 and March 8, 2022 making the findings set forth above and authorizing remote teleconference meetings for the Council and the City’s boards, commissions and committees in accordance with AB 361 for a period of 30 days.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Glendale, California as follows:
29 of 38
3 C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\CC_04052022_Resolution_4c1.pdf Section 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. Findings. The Council finds:
A. It has reconsidered the circumstance of the State of Emergency, which is still in effect;
B. The State of Emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the City’s legislative bodies (and the members of the public who would wish to attend) to meet safely in person; and
C. State and local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing.
Section 2. Remote Teleconference Meetings. The Council and all City of Glendale legislative bodies, including the Council, Successor Agency, Housing Authority, all boards, commissions and committees, and all legislative bodies established by the Council, shall conduct their meetings with remote participation in the manner authorized by Government Code § 54953(e), and such legislative bodies shall comply with the requirements to provide the public with access to the meetings as prescribed in Government Code § 54953(e)(2).
Section 3. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of May 5, 2022, or such time as the Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code § 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which meetings may continue to be held remotely by teleconference in compliance with that section. 30 of 38
4 C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\CC_04052022_Resolution_4c1.pdf Adopted this ______ day of ____________________, 2022.
___________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
I, Aram Adjemian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ___________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____day of __________, 2022, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_________________________
City Clerk
31 of 38
8a
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Selection of Dog Park site and Direction on design consultant
1. Motion approving City Parking Lot 11 as the location for a Dog Park in Glendale and directing staff to engage the services of a design consultant to prepare design alternatives and cost estimates.
2. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $350,000 from the Parks Mitigation Fee fund balance to the Dog Park Project to begin designing the park.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for April 5, 2022 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On May 13, 2021, City Council directed staff to identify the best location for a dog park in Glendale. Staff presented the three sites directed by council to the community at a virtual outreach meeting held on January 19, 2022: City Parking Lot 11, Pelanconi Park, and GCC South Campus.
Attendees at the outreach meeting selected City Parking Lot 11 as the ideal choice for a dog park location. It provides for a new park in the downtown area, qualifies for the use of Development Impact Fee funds, and coincides with council and commission goals of increasing green space in south Glendale.
At their February 28, 2022 meeting, the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission recommended that City Council approve City Parking Lot 11 as the site for a dog park and direct staff to engage the services of a design consultant to prepare design alternatives and cost estimates .
32 of 38
28 a
3 2
0 6
COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Community Services & Facilities: A dog park will support the Council priority of providing access to well-maintained parks and community facilities tailored to the City’s diverse needs.
RECOMMENDATION
Community Services & Parks recommends that City Council approve City Parking Lot 11 as the location for a Dog Park in Glendale and direct staff to engage the services of a design consultant to prepare design alternatives and cost estimates; and to appropriate $350,000 from the Parks Mitigation Fee fund balance to the Dog Park Project to begin designing the park.
BACKGROUND
On May 13, 2021, City Council asked Community Services & Parks (CSP) staff to explore the possibility of providing a dog park in one of the existing City parks or city owned open space areas.
October 26, 2021, City staff presented three city properties as potential sites for a future dog park. The sites were Pelanconi Park, Brand Park and City Parking Lot 11. Upon reviewing the report, City Council removed Brand Park from the list for consideration and asked staff to conduct a community outreach for feedback on which of the following three sites they preferred for the development of a new dog park: Pelanconi Park, City Parking Lot 11, or Glendale Community College – South Campus (GCC), a temporary option that could be used until the college constructs a parking garage on the site.
On January 29, 2022, CSP held a virtual community meeting to garner feedback from the community on their support of a dog park and ideal location for its construction. The following was presented to the community:
City Parking Lot 11 is roughly one half acre in size and is long and narrow in shape. It is located in south Glendale, at 122 E. Colorado St., between the National Guard Armory, and the Elks Lodge, and is across Colorado St. from Central Park. The site will need new utilities for lighting and irrigation, but users can access restrooms at Central Park and park at the Marketplace garage. There are some multi-family residential housing units to the south of the site.
The portion of Pelanconi Park available for a dog park is also roughly one-half of an acre and is level, easily accessed, has existing electric and water utilities, as well as park infrastructure like restrooms and parking. The park is located at 1000 Grandview Ave.
The triangular site is bordered on the north and west by commercial development and single family residential properties on the east side.
The Glendale Community College – South Campus (GCC) site is located at 1122 E.
Garfield, in southeast Glendale. The proposed site is on the southwest corner of the college site and is about 0.85 acres in size. While the site is level and easily accessed, it is only available on a temporary basis until the college constructs a parking garage on the 33 of 38
38 a
3 2
0 6
site. The college is bordered by a single and multi-family residential neighborhood and some commercial uses.
Subsequently, on February 28, 2022, CSP presented the Community Outreach meeting results to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission for feedback and recommendation.
ANALYSIS
Attendees of the January 19, 2022 community outreach meeting were invited to offer their comments and concerns about each of the three alternative locations and dog parks in general. The vast majority of the comments were positive, expressing enthusiasm and support for a new dog park.
The GCC site did not get a great deal of support due to its temporary nature, though there were inquiries about the possibility of constructing a permanent dog park on the roof of the completed parking garage.
A few attendees expressed concerns about Pelanconi Park as an option, including ongoing impacts of dog noise on neighborhood residents, the safety of other park users, taking away available green space, as well as parking and traffic safety concerns.
City Parking Lot 11 received the most support as the ideal location for a dog park.
Attendees favored this site because the location is in south Glendale, in a non- residential neighborhood, and its proximity to the multi-family housing being developed nearby. Further, selecting this site adds a new park to the city’s inventory in a location where park acreage per population is significantly below the national standards, as well as coincide with Council and Commission goal of constructing a new park in south Glendale.
Attendee feedback on location options was tabulated as follows:
Proposed Location Votes in Favor
City Parking Lot 11 25
Pelanconi Park 3
GCC South Campus 0
Attendees also made suggestions as to the type of surfacing they preferred for a dog park, as well as types of amenities to include. Staff assured the attendees that design element will be considered during the design phase of the project at future community outreach meetings.
The community outreach meeting results were shared with the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission (PRCS Commission) at their special meeting on February 28, 2022. Upon reviewing the staff report and hearing the feedback as outlined in this report from the community meeting, the PRCS Commission recommended that City Council approve City Parking Lot 11 as the site for a dog park in Glendale and direct 34 of 38
48 a
3 2
0 6
staff to engage the services of a design consultant to prepare design alternatives and cost estimates.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
On January 19, 2022, CSP staff held a virtual community outreach meeting from 6:30 pm to 7:30 pm. It was attended by thirty-two people, both over the internet and via phone.
Staff presented the three proposed alternative locations, including the pros and cons of each. The presentation also included a brief description of amenities commonly included at dog parks. Staff will reach out to the community again for feedback, once the park location has been selected by council, a design consultant selected, and a preliminary design has been prepared.
FISCAL IMPACT
The design consultant for the Dog Park will cost $350,000, which was not included as a part of the FY 2021-22 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $350,000 from the Parks Mitigation Fee fund balance. Staff will return to City Council at a later date to appropriate the remaining funds necessary for this project once there is a design and estimate for total cost of the park.
The appropriation request is outlined below:
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $350,000 24242-4050-CSP-0000 51200-4050-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP00791AN
Parks Mitigation
Fee Fund
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The required environmental review will be determined and completed upon selection of the location and design of the project and prior to any approval of the project by City Council.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: City Council may approve City Parking Lot 11 as a Dog Park site and direct staff to engage the services of a design consultant to develop design alternatives and cost estimate for a Dog Park in Glendale and appropriation $350,000 from the Parks Mitigation Fee fund balance to the Dog Park Project to commence with the consultant selection and design process.
Alternative 2: City Council may direct staff to consider additional sites for a new dog park.
Alternative 3: Any other alternative not proposed by staff. 35 of 38
58 a
3 2
0 6
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:
Peter Vierheilig, Project Manager
Koko Panossian, Deputy Director of Community Services & Parks Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
36 of 38
C:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\GLENDALE\TEMP\CC_04052022_MOTION_8A1.PDF MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby approves City Parking Lot 11 as the location for a Dog Park in Glendale, and directs staff to engage the services of a design consultant to prepare design alternatives and cost estimates, as more particularly described in the Director of Community Services and Park’s April 5, 2022 Report to the City Council.
Vote as Follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
37 of 38
RESOLUTION NO. ___________
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE
MAKING AN APPROPRIATION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
SECTION 1: That the sum of $350,000 is hereby appropriated and/or transferred from the following accounts to the following accounts:
ACCOUNTS DESCRIPTION FROM TO
24242-4050-CSP-0000
51200-4050-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP00791AN
Impact Fee Funded Projects, Parks Mitigation
Fee Fund, Community Services & Parks
Other Improvements, Parks Mitigation Fee
Fund, Community Services & Parks, Projects,
Dog Park Project
$350,000
$350,000
To appropriate funding for the Dog Park Project.
SECTION 2: The Director of Finance / Information Technology is authorized to make such other revisions, individual appropriation line-items, changes in summaries, fund totals, grand totals, and other portions of the budget document as necessary to reflect and implement the changes specified in this resolution.
SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Adopted this________day of _______________, 2022.
_______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
03/29/2022
_____________________________________
City Clerk 350,000
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Aram Adjemian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No._________was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the__________ day of _______________, 2022, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
/
Director of Finance / Information Technology
38 of 38