The Project includes 41,625 square feet of residential development open space and 7,064 square feet of landscape area throughout the residential building. A number of community spaces are proposed throughout the building, including outdoor and private terraces and a pool on the fourth floor and a dog park on the fifth floor. Terraces are also proposed on the sixth, seventeenth, nineteenth, and twenty-first floors, including roof terraces on the twenty-third and twenty-fourth floors.
LEGAL BACKGROUND
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment under SB 375 CEQA allows for the streamlining of environmental review for “transit priority projects” meeting certain criteria. (Pub. Res. Code §§ 21155, 21155.1, 21155.2.) To qualify as a transit priority project, a project must
(1) contain at least 50 percent residential use, based on total building square footage and, if the project contains between 26 percent and 50 percent nonresidential uses, a floor area ratio of not less than 0.75; (2) provide a minimum net density of at least 20 dwelling units per acre; and (3) be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan.
(Pub. Res. Code § 21155(b).) A transit priority project is eligible for CEQA’s streamlining provisions where,
[The transit priority project] is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in either a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy, for which the State Air Resources Board . . . has accepted a metropolitan planning organization’s determination that the sustainable communities strategy or the alternative planning strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.
(Pub. Res. Code § 21155(a).) On September 3, 2020, the Regional Council of the Southern California Association of Governments (“SCAG”) adopted the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (“2020-2045 RTP/SCS”), which was accepted by the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”). The final program EIR for the 2020- 2045 RTP/SCS was certified on May 7, 2020.
If “all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior applicable environmental impact reports and adopted in findings made pursuant to Section 21081” are applied to a transit priority project, the project is eligible to conduct environmental review using a sustainable communities environmental assessment (“SCEA”). (Pub. Res. Code § 21155.2.) A SCEA must contain an initial study which “identif[ies] all significant or potentially 1-2
1-3
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1755 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
significant impacts of the transit priority project . . . based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record.” (Pub. Res. Code § 21155.2(b)(1).) The initial study must also “identify any cumulative effects that have been adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the requirements of this division in prior applicable certified environmental impact reports.” (Id.) The SCEA must then “contain measures that either avoid or mitigate to a level of insignificance all potentially significant or significant effects of the project required to be identified in the initial study.” (Pub. Res. Code §21155(b)(2).) The SCEA is not required to discuss growth inducing impacts or any project specific or cumulative impacts from cars and light-duty truck trips generated by the project on global warming or the regional transportation network. (Pub.
Res. Code § 21159.28(a).)
After circulating the SCEA for public review and considering all comments, a lead agency may approve the SCEA with findings that all potentially significant impacts have been identified and mitigated to a less-than-significant level. (Pub. Res. Code § 21155(b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(5).) A lead agency’s approval of a SCEA must be supported by substantial evidence. (Pub.
Res. Code §21155(b)(7).
DISCUSSION
I. The SCEA is not adequate under CEQA because it fails to require all feasible mitigation measures from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS.
CEQA is clear that a SCEA is only appropriate where “all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior applicable environmental impact reports and adopted in findings made pursuant to Section 21081” are applied to the Project. (Pub. Res.
Code § 21155.2.) In 2020, SCAG adopted the Connect SoCal 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Program Environmental Impact Report (“2020-2045 RTP/SCS PEIR”), which included a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”). The MMRP included regional mitigation measures to be implemented by SCAG and project-level mitigation measures to be applied by lead agencies to specific projects (such as the Project here).
Despite CEQA’s clear directive that all feasible mitigation measures from prior EIRs must be applied to a project to qualify for a SCEA, numerous feasible mitigation measures from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS PEIR are not being applied to the Project. For example, for mitigation measures to reduce air quality impacts, the SCEA simply lists mitigation measure PMM AQ-1 from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS PEIR. (SCEA, p. 6.0-3 to 6.0-8.) PMM AQ-1, by its own terms, is a list of mitigation measures that the City “should consider” and “may include” for a project. (SCEA, p. 6.0-3.) There is no indication that the City has considered the many mitigation measures in PMM AQ-1 and decided which are feasible to apply to this Project.
The failure of the SCEA to clearly state which prior mitigation measures will be applied to the Project is compounded by the inconsistencies between the mitigation measures listed in the SCEA. For example, PMM AQ-1 from the 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR suggests that heavy duty off1-3 1-4
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1756 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
road construction equipment should meet “Tier 4 Final” emissions standard set by the EPA. At the same time, the SCEA also lists MM 4.2-2(h) from the Downtown Specific Plan EIR, which only requires that construction equipment meet the much dirtier Tier 2 emissions standard. (SCEA, p. 6.0-14.) Such inconsistencies could be remedied by the City revising the SCEA to make clear which prior mitigation measures will be applied to the Project. Indeed, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures be applied to a project in order for the City to proceed with a SCEA rather than an EIR or MND.
The SCEA also fails to require all feasible prior mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) impacts. An addendum to the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS in September 2020 included mitigation measure PMM-GHG-1 to reduce GHG impacts. (See Ex. B, p. 16-18.) However, the SCEA makes no mention of PMM-GHG-1 and only relies on mitigation policies from the South Glendale Community Plan EIR. (SCEA, pp. 6.0-24 to 6.0-25.) The omission of the GHG mitigation from the 2020-2045 RTP-SCS runs afoul of CEQA’s requirement that all feasible prior mitigation measures be applied to a Project in order to proceed with a SCEA rather than an EIR or MND.
II. The SCEA’s conclusions regarding the Project’s air quality impacts are not supported by substantial evidence.
Indoor air quality expert Francis “Bud” Offermann, PE, CIH, and air quality experts Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., and Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D., of the Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) reviewed the SCEA and found that the SCEA’s conclusions as to the Project’s air quality impacts were not supported by substantial evidence. Mr. Offermann found that the SCEA failed to address and mitigate the human health impacts from indoor emissions of formaldehyde. Mr. Offermann’s comment and CV are attached as Exhibit A. SWAPE found that SCEA failed to properly model the Project’s emissions and failed to properly evaluate the Project’s heath risk impacts from emissions of diesel particulate matter. SWAPE’s comment and CVs are attached as Exhibit B.
A. The SCEA failed to discuss or mitigate the Project’s significant indoor air quality impacts.
The SCEA fails to discuss, disclose, analyze, and mitigate the significant health risks posed by the Project from formaldehyde, a toxic air contaminant (“TAC”). Certified Industrial Hygienist, Francis Offermann, PE, CIH, conducted a review of the Project, the SCEA, and relevant documents regarding the Project’s indoor air emissions. Mr. Offermann is one of the world’s leading experts on indoor air quality, in particular emissions of formaldehyde, and has published extensively on the topic. As discussed below and set forth in Mr. Offermann’s comment, the Project’s emissions of formaldehyde to air will result in very significant cancer risks to future residents of the Project. Mr. Offermann’s expert opinion demonstrates the Project’s significant health risk impacts, which the City has a duty to investigate, disclose, and mitigate in the SCEA prior to approval. Mr. Offermann’s comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A.
1-4
1-5
1-6
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1757 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen and listed by the State as a TAC. SCAQMD has established a significance threshold of health risks for carcinogenic TACs of 10 in a million and a cumulative health risk threshold of 100 in a million. The SCEA fails to acknowledge the significant indoor air emissions that will result from the Project. Specifically, there is no discussion of impacts or health risks, no analysis, and no identification of mitigations for significant emissions of formaldehyde to air from the Project.
Mr. Offermann explains that many composite wood products typically used in home and apartment building construction contain formaldehyde-based glues which off-gas formaldehyde over a very long time period. He states, “The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and particle board. These materials are commonly used in residential, office, and retail building construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims.” (Ex. A, pp. 2-3.) Mr. Offermann found that future residents of the Project’s residential units will be exposed to a cancer risk from formaldehyde of approximately 120 per million, even assuming that all materials are compliant with the California Air Resources Board’s formaldehyde airborne toxics control measure. (Ex. A, pp. 3-4.) This is more than 12 times SCAQMD’s CEQA significance threshold of 10 per million. (Id., at p. 4.) Mr. Offermann concludes that these significant environmental impacts must be analyzed and mitigation measures should be imposed to reduce the risk of formaldehyde exposure. (Ex. A, pp. 4-5, 11-12.) He prescribes a methodology for estimating the Project’s formaldehyde emissions in order to do a more project-specific health risk assessment. (Id., pp. 5-10.). Mr.
Offermann also suggests several feasible mitigation measures, such as requiring the use of noadded-formaldehyde composite wood products, which are readily available. (Id., pp. 12-13.) Mr.
Offermann also suggests requiring air ventilation systems which would reduce formaldehyde levels. (Id.) Since the SCEA does not analyze this impact at all, none of these or other mitigation measures have been considered.
When a Project exceeds a duly adopted CEQA significance threshold, as here, this alone establishes substantial evidence that the project will have a significant adverse environmental impact. Indeed, in many instances, such air quality thresholds are the only criteria reviewed and treated as dispositive in evaluating the significance of a project’s air quality impacts. (See, e.g.
Schenck v. County of Sonoma (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 949, 960 [County applies Air District’s “published CEQA quantitative criteria” and “threshold level of cumulative significance”]; see also Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 110-11 [“A ‘threshold of significance’ for a given environmental effect is simply that level at which the lead agency finds the effects of the project to be significant”].) The California Supreme Court made clear the substantial importance that an air district significance threshold plays in providing substantial evidence of a significant adverse impact. 1-6
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1758 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
(Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310, 327 [“As the [South Coast Air Quality Management] District’s established significance threshold for NOx is 55 pounds per day, these estimates [of NOx emissions of 201 to 456 pounds per day] constitute substantial evidence supporting a fair argument for a significant adverse impact.”].) Since expert evidence demonstrates that the Project will exceed the SCAQMD’s CEQA significance threshold, there is substantial evidence that an “unstudied, potentially significant environmental effect[]” exists. (See Friends of Coll. of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo Cty. Cmty. Coll. Dist. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 958 [emphasis added].) As a result, the City must address this impact and identify enforceable mitigation measures prior to approving the SCEA. (See Pub. Res. Code § 21155.2(b)(5) [SCEA must mitigate all impacts to level of insignificance].)
The failure of the SCEA to address the Project’s formaldehyde emissions is contrary to the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Ass’n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 386 (“CBIA”). In that case, the Supreme Court expressly holds that potential adverse impacts to future users and residents from pollution generated by a proposed project must be addressed under CEQA. At issue in CBIA was whether the Air District could enact CEQA guidelines that advised lead agencies that they must analyze the impacts of adjacent environmental conditions on a project. The Supreme Court held that CEQA does not generally require lead agencies to consider the environment’s effects on a project. (CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800-01.) However, to the extent a project may exacerbate existing environmental conditions at or near a project site, those would still have to be considered pursuant to CEQA. (Id. at 801.) In so holding, the Court expressly held that CEQA’s statutory language required lead agencies to disclose and analyze “impacts on a project’s users or residents that arise from the project’s effects on the environment.” (Id. at 800 [emphasis added].)
The carcinogenic formaldehyde emissions identified by Mr. Offermann are not an existing environmental condition. Those emissions to the air will be from the Project. People will be residing in and working in the Project’s buildings once built and emitting formaldehyde. Once built, the Project will begin to emit formaldehyde at levels that pose significant direct and cumulative health risks. The Supreme Court in CBIA expressly finds that this type of air emission and health impact by the project on the environment and a “project’s users and residents” must be addressed in the CEQA process. The existing TAC sources near the Project site would have to be considered in evaluating the cumulative effect on future residents of both the Project’s TAC emissions as well as those existing off-site emissions.
The Supreme Court’s reasoning is well-grounded in CEQA’s statutory language. CEQA expressly includes a project’s effects on human beings as an effect on the environment that must be addressed in an environmental review. “Section 21083(b)(3)’s express language, for example, requires a finding of a ‘significant effect on the environment’ (§ 21083(b)) whenever the ‘environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.’” (CBIA, 62 Cal.4th at 800.) Likewise, “the Legislature has made clear—in declarations accompanying CEQA’s enactment—that public health and safety are of great 1-6
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1759 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
importance in the statutory scheme.” (Id. [citing e.g., PRC §§ 21000, 21001].) It goes without saying that the future residents and employees at the Project are human beings and their health and safety must be subject to CEQA’s safeguards.
The City has a duty to investigate issues relating to a project’s potential environmental impacts. (See County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern, (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1597-98. [“[U]nder CEQA, the lead agency bears a burden to investigate potential environmental impacts.”].) The proposed buildings will have significant impacts on air quality and health risks by emitting cancer-causing levels of formaldehyde into the air that will expose future residents and employees to cancer risks potentially in excess of SCAQMD’s threshold of significance for cancer health risks of 10 in a million. Currently, outside of Mr. Offermann’s comments, the City does not have any idea what risks will be posed by formaldehyde emissions from the Project or the residences. As a result, the City must include an analysis and discussion in an updated SCEA which discloses and analyzes the health risks that the Project’s formaldehyde emissions may have on future residents and identifies appropriate mitigation measures.
B. The SCEA cannot be relied upon to determine the significance of the Project’s air quality impacts because the SCEA’s air model underestimated the Project’s emissions.
SWAPE’s review of the SCEA found that it underestimated the Project’s emissions and therefore cannot be relied upon to determine the significant of the Project’s air quality impacts.
The SCEA relies on emissions calculated from the California Emissions Estimator Model Version CalEEMod.2020.4.0 (“CalEEMod”). (Ex. B, p. 2.) This model, which is used to generate a project’s construction and operational emissions, relies on recommended default values based on site specific information related to a number of factors (Id., p. 2.) CEQA requires that any changes to the default values must be justified by substantial evidence. (Id.)
SWAPE reviewed the Project’s CalEEMod output files and found that the values input into the model were inconsistent with information provided in the SCEA. (Ex. B, p. 3.) This results in an underestimation of the Project’s emissions. (Id.) As a result, the SCEA’s air quality analysis cannot be relied upon to estimate the Project’s emissions.
Specifically, SWAPE found that the following values used in the SCEA’s air quality analysis were either inconsistent with information provided in the SCEA or otherwise unjustified:
1. Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural/Area Coating (Ex. B, pp. 3-4.)
2. Unsubstantiated Changes to Construction Phase Lengths (Ex. B, pp. 4-6.)
3. Improper Application of Operational Mitigation Measures (Ex. B, pp. 6-7.) As a result of these errors in the SECA, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are underestimated and cannot be relied upon to determine the significance of the Project’s air quality impacts.
1-6
1-7
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1760 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
C. The SCEA inadequately analyzed the Project’s impact on human health from emissions of diesel particulate matter.
The SCEA concluded that the Project would result in a less-than-significant health risk impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis (“HRA”). (Ex. B, p. 8.) The SCEA concluded that construction-related TAC impacts would be less than significant because emissions of PM2.5 would not exceed localized thresholds. (Id.) However, SWAPE found that the SCEA’s analysis of the Project’s health risks were inadequate. (Ex. B, pp. 9-10.)
First, the localized significance threshold (“LST”) methodology relied on by the SCEA does not account for TAC pollutants such as diesel particulate matter (“DPM”). Rather, the LST methodology only covers emissions of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. (Ex. B, p. 9.) As SWAPE explains, “this method cannot be used to determine whether emissions from TACs, specifically DPM, a known human carcinogen, would result in a significant health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors.” (Id.) By not analyzing the impacts of DPM emissions, the SCEA failed to provide substantial evidence that the impacts would be less than significant, as claimed.
Second, the SCEA fails to include a quantified HRA to evaluate the Project’s health risks to nearby sensitive receptors resulting from construction and operation of the Project. (Ex. B, p.
9.) The Project would generate approximately 1,198 average daily vehicle trips, yet the SCEA vague does not disclose or discuss the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. (Id.) Thus, the SCEA is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by the Project with the potential adverse impacts on human health. (Id.)
Third, the failure of the SCEA to provide a quantified HRA is inconsistent with the most recent guidance of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”).
OEHHA recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”). (Ex. B, pp. 9-10.) Therefore, the SCEA must be revised to include an analysis of health risks resulting from construction and operation of the Project.
D. An updated air quality analysis indicates that the Project will result in significant emissions of VOCs and DPM.
In an effort to accurately determine the proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions, SWAPE prepared an updated CalEEMod model that includes more site-specific information and correct input parameters, as provided by the MND. (Ex. B, p. 7.) SWAPE’s updated analysis “proportionately altered the individual construction phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 35 months, omitted the unsubstantiated changes to the architectural and area coating emission factors and areas, and excluded the incorrect area-related operational mitigation measures.” (Id.) SWAPE’s updated model found that Project’s 1-8
1-9
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1761 of 2287
SAFER Comment
Lucia Park Project - SCEA
March 9, 2022
construction-related emissions of volatile organic compounds “VOCs” emissions exceed the applicable CEQA thresholds set by SCAQMD.” (Id. at pp. 7-8.) Because the SCEA must “contain measures that either avoid or mitigate to a level of insignificance all potentially significant or significant effects of the project required to be identified in the initial study” (Pub. Res. Code §21155(b)(2)), the SCEA must be revised in order to disclose and mitigate the Project’s significant VOC emissions.
SWAPE also prepared a screening-level health risk assessment (“HRA”) to evaluate potential DPM impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. (Ex. B, pp. 10-12.) SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. (Id. at p.
10.) SWAPE used a sensitive receptor distance of 200 feet and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA and SCAQMD guidance. (Id. at pp. 11-12.) SWAPE found that the excess cancer risk for infants, children, and adults at the closest sensitive receptor located approximately 200 feet away, over the course of Project construction and operation, is approximately 233, 127, and 13.4 in one million, respectively. (Ex. B, p. 13.) Moreover, SWAPE found that the excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime is approximately 383 in one million. (Id.) The infants, children, adults, and lifetime cancer risks all exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million. Because a SCEA is only appropriate where all impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance, the City must prepare a revised SCEA to mitigate this impact or otherwise prepare an EIR.
CONCLUSION
The SCEA for the Project should be revised prior to any further action on the Project.
The SCEA’s fails to require all feasible mitigation measures from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS EIR.
Furthermore, the SCEA fails to identify and mitigate the Project’s air quality impacts to a lessthan-significant level. For those reasons, the SCEA must be revised or, in the alternative, the City may prepare an EIR or MND. Thank you for considering these comments.
Sincerely,
Brian B. Flynn
Lozeau Drury LLP
1-9
1-10
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1762 of 2287
EXHIBIT A
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1763 of 2287
INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
1448 Pine Street, Suite 103 San Francisco, California 94109 Telephone: (415) 567-7700
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.iee-sf.com
Date: January 27, 2022
To: Brian Flynn
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, California 94612
From: Francis J. Offermann PE CIH
Subject: Indoor Air Quality: Lucia Park Project - Glendale, CA (IEE File Reference: P-4540)
Pages: 18
Indoor Air Quality Impacts
Indoor air quality (IAQ) directly impacts the comfort and health of building occupants, and the achievement of acceptable IAQ in newly constructed and renovated buildings is a well-recognized design objective. For example, IAQ is addressed by major highperformance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014). Indoor air quality in homes is particularly important because occupants, on average, spend approximately ninety percent of their time indoors with the majority of this time spent at home (EPA, 2011). Some segments of the population that are most susceptible to the effects of poor IAQ, such as the very young and the elderly, occupy their homes almost continuously. Additionally, an increasing number of adults are working from home at least some of the time during the workweek.
Indoor air quality also is a serious concern for workers in hotels, offices and other business establishments.
The concentrations of many air pollutants often are elevated in homes and other buildings relative to outdoor air because many of the materials and products used indoors contain 1-11
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1764 of 2287
2 of 18
and release a variety of pollutants to air (Hodgson et al., 2002; Offermann and Hodgson, 2011). With respect to indoor air contaminants for which inhalation is the primary route of exposure, the critical design and construction parameters are the provision of adequate ventilation and the reduction of indoor sources of the contaminants.
Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Impact. In the California New Home Study (CNHS) of 108 new homes in California (Offermann, 2009), 25 air contaminants were measured, and formaldehyde was identified as the indoor air contaminant with the highest cancer risk as determined by the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), No Significant Risk Levels (NSRL) for carcinogens. The NSRL is the daily intake level calculated to result in one excess case of cancer in an exposed population of 100,000 (i.e., ten in one million cancer risk) and for formaldehyde is 40 µg/day. The NSRL concentration of formaldehyde that represents a daily dose of 40 µg is 2 µg/m3 , assuming
a continuous 24-hour exposure, a total daily inhaled air volume of 20 m3 , and 100%
absorption by the respiratory system. All of the CNHS homes exceeded this NSRL concentration of 2 µg/m3. The median indoor formaldehyde concentration was 36 µg/m3, and ranged from 4.8 to 136 µg/m3
, which corresponds to a median exceedence of the 2
µg/m3
NSRL concentration of 18 and a range of 2.3 to 68.
Therefore, the cancer risk of a resident living in a California home with the median indoor formaldehyde concentration of 36 µg/m3
, is 180 per million as a result of formaldehyde
alone. The CEQA significance threshold for airborne cancer risk is 10 per million, as established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD, 2015).
Besides being a human carcinogen, formaldehyde is also a potent eye and respiratory irritant. In the CNHS, many homes exceeded the non-cancer reference exposure levels (RELs) prescribed by California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2017b). The percentage of homes exceeding the RELs ranged from 98% for the Chronic REL of 9 µg/m3
to 28% for the Acute REL of 55 µg/m3.
The primary source of formaldehyde indoors is composite wood products manufactured with urea-formaldehyde resins, such as plywood, medium density fiberboard, and 1-11
1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1765 of 2287
3 of 18
particleboard. These materials are commonly used in building construction for flooring, cabinetry, baseboards, window shades, interior doors, and window and door trims.
In January 2009, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted an airborne toxics control measure (ATCM) to reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, including hardwood plywood, particleboard, medium density fiberboard, and also furniture and other finished products made with these wood products (California Air Resources Board 2009). While this formaldehyde ATCM has resulted in reduced emissions from composite wood products sold in California, they do not preclude that homes built with composite wood products meeting the CARB ATCM will have indoor formaldehyde concentrations below cancer and non-cancer exposure guidelines.
A follow up study to the California New Home Study (CNHS) was conducted in 2016- 2018 (Singer et. al., 2019), and found that the median indoor formaldehyde in new homes built after 2009 with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials had lower indoor formaldehyde concentrations, with a median indoor concentrations of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2
ppb) as compared to a median of 36 µg/m3
found in the 2007 CNHS. Unlike in the CNHS
study where formaldehyde concentrations were measured with pumped DNPH samplers, the formaldehyde concentrations in the HENGH study were measured with passive samplers, which were estimated to under-measure the true indoor formaldehyde concentrations by approximately 7.5%. Applying this correction to the HENGH indoor formaldehyde concentrations results in a median indoor concentration of 24.1 µg/m3 ,
which is 33% lower than the 36 µg/m3
found in the 2007 CNHS.
Thus, while new homes built after the 2009 CARB formaldehyde ATCM have a 33% lower median indoor formaldehyde concentration and cancer risk, the median lifetime cancer risk is still 120 per million for homes built with CARB compliant composite wood products. This median lifetime cancer risk is more than 12 times the OEHHA 10 in a million cancer risk threshold (OEHHA, 2017a).
With respect to the Lucia Park Project - Glendale, CA, the buildings consist of residential spaces.
1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1766 of 2287
4 of 18
The residential occupants will potentially have continuous exposure (e.g. 24 hours per day, 52 weeks per year). These exposures are anticipated to result in significant cancer risks resulting from exposures to formaldehyde released by the building materials and furnishing commonly found in residential construction.
Because these residences will be constructed with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, and be ventilated with the minimum code required amount of outdoor air, the indoor residential formaldehyde concentrations are likely similar to those concentrations observed in residences built with CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials, which is a median of 24.1 µg/m3 (Singer et. al., 2020)
Assuming that the residential occupants inhale 20 m3 of air per day, the average 70-year lifetime formaldehyde daily dose is 482 µg/day for continuous exposure in the residences. This exposure represents a cancer risk of 120 per million, which is more than 12 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. For occupants that do not have continuous exposure, the cancer risk will be proportionally less but still substantially over the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million (e.g. for 12/hour/day occupancy, more than 6 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million).
Appendix A, Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations and the CARB Formaldehyde ATCM, provides analyses that show utilization of CARB Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials will not ensure acceptable cancer risks with respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products.
Even composite wood products manufactured with CARB certified ultra low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins do not insure that the indoor air will have concentrations of formaldehyde the meet the OEHHA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million.
The permissible emission rates for ULEF composite wood products are only 11-15% lower than the CARB Phase 2 emission rates. Only use of composite wood products made with no-added formaldehyde resins (NAF), such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl 1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1767 of 2287
5 of 18
acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met.
The following describes a method that should be used, prior to construction in the environmental review under CEQA, for determining whether the indoor concentrations resulting from the formaldehyde emissions of specific building materials/furnishings selected exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines. Such a design analyses can be used to identify those materials/furnishings prior to the completion of the City’s CEQA review and project approval, that have formaldehyde emission rates that contribute to indoor concentrations that exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, so that alternative lower emitting materials/furnishings may be selected and/or higher minimum outdoor air ventilation rates can be increased to achieve acceptable indoor concentrations and incorporated as mitigation measures for this project.
Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment This formaldehyde emissions assessment should be used in the environmental review under CEQA to assess the indoor formaldehyde concentrations from the proposed loading of building materials/furnishings, the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate data for building materials/furnishings, and the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. This assessment allows the applicant (and the City) to determine, before the conclusion of the environmental review process and the building materials/furnishings are specified, purchased, and installed, if the total chemical emissions will exceed cancer and non-cancer guidelines, and if so, allow for changes in the selection of specific material/furnishings and/or the design minimum outdoor air ventilations rates such that cancer and non-cancer guidelines are not exceeded.
1.) Define Indoor Air Quality Zones. Divide the building into separate indoor air quality zones, (IAQ Zones). IAQ Zones are defined as areas of well-mixed air. Thus, each ventilation system with recirculating air is considered a single zone, and each room or group of rooms where air is not recirculated (e.g. 100% outdoor air) is considered a separate zone. For IAQ Zones with the same construction material/furnishings and design minimum outdoor air ventilation rates. (e.g. hotel rooms, apartments, condominiums, 1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1768 of 2287
6 of 18
etc.) the formaldehyde emission rates need only be assessed for a single IAQ Zone of that type.
2.) Calculate Material/Furnishing Loading. For each IAQ Zone, determine the building material and furnishing loadings (e.g., m2 of material/m2 floor area, units of furnishings/m2 floor area) from an inventory of all potential indoor formaldehyde sources, including flooring, ceiling tiles, furnishings, finishes, insulation, sealants, adhesives, and any products constructed with composite wood products containing ureaformaldehyde resins (e.g., plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard).
3.) Calculate the Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each building material, calculate the formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) from the product of the area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/m2
-h) and the area (m2) of material in the IAQ Zone, and from each furnishing (e.g. chairs, desks, etc.) from the unit-specific formaldehyde emission rate (µg/unit-h) and the number of units in the IAQ Zone.
NOTE: As a result of the high-performance building rating systems and building codes (California Building Standards Commission, 2014; USGBC, 2014), most manufacturers of building materials furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers,” (CDPH, 2017), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods. Most manufacturers of building furnishings sold in the United States conduct chemical emission rate tests using ANSI/BIFMA M7.1 Standard Test Method for Determining VOC Emissions (BIFMA, 2018), or other equivalent chemical emission rate testing methods.
CDPH, BIFMA, and other chemical emission rate testing programs, typically certify that a material or furnishing does not create indoor chemical concentrations in excess of the maximum concentrations permitted by their certification. For instance, the CDPH emission rate testing requires that the measured emission rates when input into an office, school, or residential model do not exceed one-half of the OEHHA Chronic Exposure Guidelines (OEHHA, 2017b) for the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in 1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1769 of 2287
7 of 18
Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017). These certifications themselves do not provide the actual area-specific formaldehyde emission rate (i.e., µg/m2-h) of the product, but rather provide data that the formaldehyde emission rates do not exceed the maximum rate allowed for the certification. Thus, for example, the data for a certification of a specific type of flooring may be used to calculate that the area-specific emission rate of formaldehyde is less than 31 µg/m2
-h, but not the actual measured specific emission
rate, which may be 3, 18, or 30 µg/m2
-h. These area-specific emission rates determined
from the product certifications of CDPH, BIFA, and other certification programs can be used as an initial estimate of the formaldehyde emission rate.
If the actual area-specific emission rates of a building material or furnishing is needed (i.e. the initial emission rates estimates from the product certifications are higher than desired), then that data can be acquired by requesting from the manufacturer the complete chemical emission rate test report. For instance if the complete CDPH emission test report is requested for a CDHP certified product, that report will provide the actual areaspecific emission rates for not only the 35 specific VOCs, including formaldehyde, listed in Table 4-1 of the CDPH test method (CDPH, 2017), but also all of the cancer and reproductive/developmental chemicals listed in the California Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels (OEHHA, 2017a), all of the toxic air contaminants (TACs) in the California Air Resources Board Toxic Air Contamination List (CARB, 2011), and the 10 chemicals with the greatest emission rates.
Alternatively, a sample of the building material or furnishing can be submitted to a chemical emission rate testing laboratory, such as Berkeley Analytical Laboratory (https://berkeleyanalytical.com), to measure the formaldehyde emission rate.
4.) Calculate the Total Formaldehyde Emission Rate. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the total formaldehyde emission rate (i.e. µg/h) from the individual formaldehyde emission rates from each of the building material/furnishings as determined in Step 3.
5.) Calculate the Indoor Formaldehyde Concentration. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3) from Equation 1 by dividing the total 1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1770 of 2287
8 of 18
formaldehyde emission rates (i.e. µg/h) as determined in Step 4, by the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate (m3
/h) for the IAQ Zone.
𝐶!" = #!"!#$
$"#
(Equation 1)
where:
Cin = indoor formaldehyde concentration (µg/m3
)
Etotal = total formaldehyde emission rate (µg/h) into the IAQ Zone.
Qoa = design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone (m3/h) The above Equation 1 is based upon mass balance theory, and is referenced in Section
3.10.2 “Calculation of Estimated Building Concentrations” of the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017).
6.) Calculate the Indoor Exposure Cancer and Non-Cancer Health Risks. For each IAQ Zone, calculate the cancer and non-cancer health risks from the indoor formaldehyde concentrations determined in Step 5 and as described in the OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA, 2015).
7.) Mitigate Indoor Formaldehyde Exposures of exceeding the CEQA Cancer and/or Non-Cancer Health Risks. In each IAQ Zone, provide mitigation for any formaldehyde exposure risk as determined in Step 6, that exceeds the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million or the CEQA non-cancer Hazard Quotient of 1.0.
Provide the source and/or ventilation mitigation required in all IAQ Zones to reduce the health risks of the chemical exposures below the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks.
Source mitigation for formaldehyde may include:
1.) reducing the amount materials and/or furnishings that emit formaldehyde
2.) substituting a different material with a lower area-specific emission rate of 1-12
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1771 of 2287
9 of 18
formaldehyde
Ventilation mitigation for formaldehyde emitted from building materials and/or furnishings may include:
1.) increasing the design minimum outdoor air ventilation rate to the IAQ Zone.
NOTE: Mitigating the formaldehyde emissions through use of less material/furnishings, or use of lower emitting materials/furnishings, is the preferred mitigation option, as mitigation with increased outdoor air ventilation increases initial and operating costs associated with the heating/cooling systems.
Further, we are not asking that the builder “speculate” on what and how much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers,” (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described earlier above (i.e. PreConstruction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde.
Outdoor Air Ventilation Impact. Another important finding of the CNHS, was that the outdoor air ventilation rates in the homes were very low. Outdoor air ventilation is a very important factor influencing the indoor concentrations of air contaminants, as it is the primary removal mechanism of all indoor air generated contaminants. Lower outdoor air exchange rates cause indoor generated air contaminants to accumulate to higher indoor air concentrations. Many homeowners rarely open their windows or doors for ventilation as a result of their concerns for security/safety, noise, dust, and odor concerns (Price, 2007). In the CNHS field study, 32% of the homes did not use their windows during the 24‐hour Test Day, and 15% of the homes did not use their windows during the entire preceding week. Most of the homes with no window usage were homes in the winter field session.
Thus, a substantial percentage of homeowners never open their windows, especially in the 1-12
1-13
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1772 of 2287
10 of 18
winter season. The median 24‐hour measurement was 0.26 air changes per hour (ach), with a range of 0.09 ach to 5.3 ach. A total of 67% of the homes had outdoor air exchange rates below the minimum California Building Code (2001) requirement of 0.35 ach. Thus, the relatively tight envelope construction, combined with the fact that many people never open their windows for ventilation, results in homes with low outdoor air exchange rates and higher indoor air contaminant concentrations.
According to the Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project, (City of Glendale, 2022), the Project is close to roads with moderate to high traffic (e.g., CA-134, West Doran Street, North Pacific Avenue, Sanchez Drive, Pioneer Drive, etc.). According to the Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project, (City of Glendale, 2022), the existing plus Project traffic noise levels are reported in Table 5.13-4 to range from 53.1 dBA 63.3 dBA CNEL. As a result the Project site is a sound impacted site.
As a result of high outdoor noise levels, the current project will require a mechanical supply of outdoor air ventilation to allow for a habitable interior environment with closed windows and doors. Such a ventilation system would allow windows and doors to be kept closed at the occupant’s discretion to control exterior noise within building interiors.
PM2.5 Outdoor Concentrations Impact. An additional impact of the nearby motor vehicle traffic associated with this project, are the outdoor concentrations of PM2.5.
According to the Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project, (City of Glendale, 2022), the Project is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is a State and Federal non-attainment area for PM2.5.
An air quality analyses should to be conducted to determine the concentrations of PM2.5 in the outdoor and indoor air that people inhale each day. This air quality analyses needs to consider the cumulative impacts of the project related emissions, existing and projected future emissions from local PM2.5 sources (e.g. stationary sources, motor vehicles, and airport traffic) upon the outdoor air concentrations at the Project site. If the outdoor concentrations are determined to exceed the California and National annual average PM2.5 1-13
1-14
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1773 of 2287
11 of 18
exceedence concentration of 12 µg/m3, or the National 24-hour average exceedence concentration of 35 µg/m3, then the buildings need to have a mechanical supply of outdoor air that has air filtration with sufficient removal efficiency, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles is less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards.
It is my experience that based on the projected high traffic noise levels, the annual average concentration of PM2.5 will exceed the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards and warrant installation of high efficiency air filters (i.e. MERV 13 or higher) in all mechanically supplied outdoor air ventilation systems.
Indoor Air Quality Impact Mitigation Measures
The following are recommended mitigation measures to minimize the impacts upon indoor quality:
Indoor Formaldehyde Concentrations Mitigation. Use only composite wood materials (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins (CARB, 2009). CARB Phase 2 certified composite wood products, or ultra-low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins, do not insure indoor formaldehyde concentrations that are below the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million. Only composite wood products manufactured with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins, such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met.
Alternatively, conduct the previously described Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Chemical Emissions Assessment, to determine that the combination of formaldehyde emissions from building materials and furnishings do not create indoor formaldehyde concentrations that exceed the CEQA cancer and non-cancer health risks.
It is important to note that we are not asking that the builder “speculate” on what and how 1-14
1-15
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1774 of 2287
12 of 18
much composite materials be used, but rather at the design stage to select composite wood materials based on the formaldehyde emission rates that manufacturers routinely conduct using the California Department of Health “Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers”, (CDPH, 2017), and use the procedure described above (i.e.
Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde.
Outdoor Air Ventilation Mitigation. Provide each habitable room with a continuous mechanical supply of outdoor air that meets or exceeds the California 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (California Energy Commission, 2015) requirements of the greater of 15 cfm/occupant or 0.15 cfm/ft2
of floor area. Following installation of the
system conduct testing and balancing to insure that required amount of outdoor air is entering each habitable room and provide a written report documenting the outdoor airflow rates. Do not use exhaust only mechanical outdoor air systems, use only balanced outdoor air supply and exhaust systems or outdoor air supply only systems. Provide a manual for the occupants or maintenance personnel, that describes the purpose of the mechanical outdoor air system and the operation and maintenance requirements of the system.
PM2.5 Outdoor Air Concentration Mitigation. Install air filtration with sufficient PM2.5 removal efficiency (e.g. MERV 13 or higher) to filter the outdoor air entering the mechanical outdoor air supply systems, such that the indoor concentrations of outdoor PM2.5 particles are less than the California and National PM2.5 annual and 24-hour standards. Install the air filters in the system such that they are accessible for replacement by the occupants or maintenance personnel. Include in the mechanical outdoor air ventilation system manual instructions on how to replace the air filters and the estimated frequency of replacement.
References
1-15
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1775 of 2287
13 of 18
BIFA. 2018. BIFMA Product Safety and Performance Standards and Guidelines. www.bifma.org/page/standardsoverview
California Air Resources Board. 2009. Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Reduce Formaldehyde Emissions from Composite Wood Products. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
https://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2007/compwood07/fro-final.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2011. Toxic Air Contaminant Identification List.
California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/id/taclist.htm
California Building Code. 2001. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2 Volume 1, Appendix Chapter 12, Interior Environment, Division 1, Ventilation, Section 1207:
2001 California Building Code, California Building Standards Commission. Sacramento, CA.
California Building Standards Commission (2014). 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11. California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx.
California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2007-033. Final Report, ARB Contract 03-326. Available at: www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/03-326.pdf.
California Energy Commission, 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2015publications/CEC-400-2015-037/CEC-400-2015-037- CMF.pdf
CDPH. 2017. Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1776 of 2287
14 of 18
California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA.
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/ DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx.
City of Glendale. 2022. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project.
EPA. 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, Chapter 16 – Activity Factors.
Report EPA/600/R-09/052F, September 2011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Hodgson, A. T., D. Beal, J.E.R. McIlvaine. 2002. Sources of formaldehyde, other aldehydes and terpenes in a new manufactured house. Indoor Air 12: 235–242.
OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines; Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.
OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). 2017a. Proposition 65 Safe Harbor Levels. No Significant Risk Levels for Carcinogens and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for Chemicals Causing Reproductive Toxicity. Available at:
http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/pdf/safeharbor081513.pdf OEHHA - Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2017b. All OEHHA Acute, 8-hour and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels. Available at:
http://oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html
Offermann, F. J. 2009. Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality in New Homes. California Air Resources Board and California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program. Collaborative Report. CEC-500-2009-085. https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/apr/past/04-310.pdf
Offermann, F. J. and A. T. Hodgson. 2011. Emission Rates of Volatile Organic Compounds in New Homes. Proceedings Indoor Air 2011 (12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate 2011), June 5-10, 2011, Austin, TX.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1777 of 2287
15 of 18
Singer, B.C, Chan, W.R, Kim, Y., Offermann, F.J., and Walker I.S. 2020. Indoor Air Quality in California Homes with Code-Required Mechanical Ventilation. Indoor Air, Vol 30, Issue 5, 885-899.
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2015. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Handbook. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/airquality-analysis-handbook USGBC. 2014. LEED BD+C Homes v4. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C. http://www.usgbc.org/credits/homes/v4
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1778 of 2287
16 of 18
APPENDIX A
INDOOR FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS
AND THE
CARB FORMALDEHYDE ATCM
With respect to formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, the CARB ATCM regulations of formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, do not assure healthful indoor air quality. The following is the stated purpose of the CARB ATCM regulation - The purpose of this airborne toxic control measure is to “reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products, and finished goods that contain composite wood products, that are sold, offered for sale, supplied, used, or manufactured for sale in California”. In other words, the CARB ATCM regulations do not “assure healthful indoor air quality”, but rather “reduce formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products”.
Just how much protection do the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products? Definitely some, but certainly the regulations do not “assure healthful indoor air quality” when CARB Phase 2 products are utilized. As shown in the Chan 2019 study of new California homes, the median indoor formaldehyde concentration was of 22.4 µg/m3 (18.2 ppb),
which corresponds to a cancer risk of 112 per million for occupants with continuous exposure, which is more than 11 times the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million.
Another way of looking at how much protection the CARB ATCM regulations provide building occupants from the formaldehyde emissions generated by composite wood products is to calculate the maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy.
For this calculation I utilized the floor area (2,272 ft2 ), the ceiling height (8.5 ft), and the
number of bedrooms (4) as defined in Appendix B (New Single-Family Residence Scenario) of the Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1, 2017, California Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1779 of 2287
17 of 18
Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/ DEODC/EHLB/IAQ/Pages/VOC.aspx.
For the outdoor air ventilation rate I used the 2019 Title 24 code required mechanical ventilation rate (ASHRAE 62.2) of 106 cfm (180 m3
/h) calculated for this model residence.
For the composite wood formaldehyde emission rates I used the CARB ATCM Phase 2 rates.
The calculated maximum number of square feet of composite wood product that can be in a residence, without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products.
Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) – 15 ft2
(0.7% of the floor area), or
Particle Board – 30 ft2
(1.3% of the floor area), or
Hardwood Plywood – 54 ft2
(2.4% of the floor area), or
Thin MDF – 46 ft2
(2.0 % of the floor area).
For offices and hotels the calculated maximum amount of composite wood product (% of floor area) that can be used without exceeding the CEQA cancer risk of 10 per million for occupants, assuming 8 hours/day occupancy, and the California Mechanical Code minimum outdoor air ventilation rates are as follows for the different types of regulated composite wood products.
Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) – 3.6 % (offices) and 4.6% (hotel rooms), or Particle Board – 7.2 % (offices) and 9.4% (hotel rooms), or Hardwood Plywood – 13 % (offices) and 17% (hotel rooms), or Thin MDF – 11 % (offices) and 14 % (hotel rooms)
Clearly the CARB ATCM does not regulate the formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products such that the potentially large areas of these products, such as for flooring, baseboards, interior doors, window and door trims, and kitchen and bathroom cabinetry, Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1780 of 2287
18 of 18
could be used without causing indoor formaldehyde concentrations that result in CEQA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million for occupants with continuous occupancy.
Even composite wood products manufactured with CARB certified ultra low emitting formaldehyde (ULEF) resins do not insure that the indoor air will have concentrations of formaldehyde the meet the OEHHA cancer risks that substantially exceed 10 per million.
The permissible emission rates for ULEF composite wood products are only 11-15% lower than the CARB Phase 2 emission rates. Only use of composite wood products made with no-added formaldehyde resins (NAF), such as resins made from soy, polyvinyl acetate, or methylene diisocyanate can insure that the OEHHA cancer risk of 10 per million is met.
If CARB Phase 2 compliant or ULEF composite wood products are utilized in construction, then the resulting indoor formaldehyde concentrations should be determined in the design phase using the specific amounts of each type of composite wood product, the specific formaldehyde emission rates, and the volume and outdoor air ventilation rates of the indoor spaces, and all feasible mitigation measures employed to reduce this impact (e.g. use less formaldehyde containing composite wood products and/or incorporate mechanical systems capable of higher outdoor air ventilation rates). See the procedure described earlier (i.e. Pre-Construction Building Material/Furnishing Formaldehyde Emissions Assessment) to insure that the materials selected achieve acceptable cancer risks from material off gassing of formaldehyde.
Alternatively, and perhaps a simpler approach, is to use only composite wood products (e.g. hardwood plywood, medium density fiberboard, particleboard) for all interior finish systems that are made with CARB approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) resins.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1781 of 2287
!"
#
$%%
&
'()
*
+",)
!"
)
*+
-
.../%/
.
/-
0123 4125678
9:1;<=3 036=>?8
@A<=B<7C
D3:E<F3G H<6C71G><F
D3:E<F3G I6J1:6>1:8
D3:E<F3G K1:LG?15G
M
D32<76:G NO53:>
K<>73GG
D3:E<F3G P3G1A:F3G
Q3RG
M
NE37>G N25=18237> 417>6F>
SG
NO53:>
K<>73GG
D3:E<F3G T:67F<G
U@ABV
WX
Y;;3:2677
9N
4Z0 &
)
)
'*/
[
\
)
/
1;;3:2677]<33^G;XF12 NBAF6><17_/
/
_
-
%
`
,)
%
)
'*/ a
"
"
*
&
"
_
'
`
,
% '%
)
!
b,)
'*/ !/
/
_
-
c
&
,
-
")
d
,) e/f/ 9:1;3GG<176=
g;;<=<6><17G *'a()
*(*)
*
(c*)
'
)
*
d_)
*+)
&*c_*)
`
a!'
K1:L
NO53:<37F3 _
/
$%%
&)
'()
-
hi
,
*+
-
)
-
"-
)
.
b-
"
/
(
%
)
\
*+
cj[
"
%
/ *
%
)
_
/
$%%
,
%
)
-)
-
k",
\"
/
`
_
/
$%%
l "
)
-
\
-
*+
"
-
/
(
-
"
)
*+
)
)
"
\"
"
"
"
%
*+/
I<><C6><17
NO53:<37F3 _
/
$%%
-
\
k"%
"
"
"
- %
%
k",
%
\
-
%%
%
/
( -
\
k",
"
)
)
"
\"
"
%
)
\/
%
k",
-
-
.
b
m"
,
,
%
\
"
"
)
\"
)
"%%
"
)
%%
%
"
%
\"
)
%"
-
\
)
%
/
_
/
$%%
-
%
.-
-
%
\,
%
,
k",
"
["\
n,
,
/
o<3R
4A::<FA=A2
o<>63 U9HTV
'
,
-
i
/
\,
d
d
-
,/
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1782 of 2287
EXHIBIT B
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1783 of 2287
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
February 14, 2022
Brian Flynn
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94618
Subject: Comments on the Lucia Park Project (SCH No. 2022010297) Dear Mr. Flynn,
We have reviewed the January 2022 Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (“SCEA”) for the Lucia Park Project (“Project”) located in the City of Glendale (“City”). The Project proposes to demolish an existing office building and parking structure and construct a 417,135-SF apartment building consisting of 294 residential units and 502 parking spaces on the 1.46-acre site.
Our review concludes that the SCEA fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, and health risk impacts that the project may have on the surrounding environment.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Inadequate Analysis and Disclosure of Impacts
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) was not prepared for the Project site. The preparation of a Phase I ESA is routinely undertaken in the preparation of CEQA documents to identify and disclose hazardous waste issues that may present impacts to the public, workers, or the environment, and which may require further investigation, including environmental sampling and cleanup. 1-16
1-17
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1784 of 2287
2 Standards for performing a Phase I ESA have been established by the US EPA and the American Society for Testing and Materials Standards (“ASTM”).1 Phase I ESAs are conducted to identify conditions that would indicate a release of hazardous substances and include:
• a review of all known sites in the vicinity of the subject property that are on regulatory agency databases undergoing assessment or cleanup activities;
• an inspection;
• interviews with people knowledgeable about the property; and • recommendations for further actions to address potential hazards.
Phase I ESAs conclude with the identification of any “recognized environmental conditions” (“RECs”) and recommendations to address such conditions. A REC is the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. If RECs are identified, then a Phase II ESA generally follows, which includes the collection of soil, soil vapor and groundwater samples, as necessary, to identify the extent of contamination and the need for cleanup to reduce exposure potential to the public.
A Phase I ESA, completed by a licensed environmental professional, is necessary for inclusion in an EIR to identify and disclose recognized environmental conditions, if any, at the proposed Project site. If past land uses have resulted in RECs, a Phase II should be conducted to sample for residual concentrations of contaminants in soil. Any contamination that is identified above regulatory screening levels, including California Department of Toxic Substances Control Soil Screening Levels,2should be further evaluated and cleaned up, if necessary, in coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control.
Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The air quality analysis provided in the SCEA relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2020.4.0 (5.0- 23).3 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant 1 http://www.astm.org/Standards/E1527.htm.
2 https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2019/04/HHRA-Note-3-June-2020-A.pdf. 3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.
1-17
1-18
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1785 of 2287
3 emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.
When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study (“AQ & GHG Study”) as Appendix A to the SCEA, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the SCEA. As a result, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are underestimated. Therefore, an EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.
Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors and Areas Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Lucia Park - Project” model includes several reductions to the default architectural and area coating emission factors and areas (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 72, 104, 155):
As you can see in the excerpt above, the nonresidential exterior and interior architectural and area coating emission factors were each reduced from their default value of 100- to 50-grams per liter (“g/L”). Additionally, the architectural and area coating area square feet were reduced from their default values. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.4 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings” (Appendix A, pp. 71, 103, 154).
Furthermore, SCEA incorporates mitigation measure SCAG EIR PMM-AQ-1, which states:
“Architectural coatings and solvents applied during construction activities shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113, which governs the VOC content of architectural coatings” (p. 3.0-19).
However, these changes remain unsupported for two reasons. 4“CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.
1-18
1-19
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1786 of 2287
4 First, we cannot verify the accuracy of the revised architectural and area coating emission factors based on SCAQMD Rule 1113 alone. The SCAQMD Rule 1113 Table of Standards provides the required VOC limits (grams of VOC per liter of coating) for 57 different coating categories (e.g., Floor coatings, Faux Finishing Coatings, Fire-Proofing Coatings, Cement Coatings, Multi-Color Coatings, Primers, Sealers, Recycled Coatings, Shellac, Stains, Traffic Coatings, Waterproofing Sealers, Wood Coatings, etc.). The VOC limits for each coating varies from a minimum value of 50 g/L to a maximum value of 730 g/L. As such, we cannot verify that SCAQMD Rule 1113 substantiates reductions to the default coating values without more information regarding what category of coating will be used. As the SCEA and associated documents fail explicitly require the Project use a specific type of coating, we are unable to verify the revised emission factors assumed in the model.
Second, SCAQMD fails to address architectural and area coating areas whatsoever. As the SCEA and associated also fail to mention or justify the architectural and area coating areas, we cannot verify the revised values.
These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the architectural and area coating emission factors and areas to calculate the Project’s reactive organic gas/volatile organic compound (“ROG”/“VOC”) emissions associated with application rates and coating content. Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the Project’s architectural and area coating emission factors and areas, the model may underestimate the Project’s ROG/VOC emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Lucia Park - Project” model includes several changes to the default individual construction phase lengths (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 73, 105, 156).
As a result of these changes, the model includes the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix A, pp. 76, 108, 160):
1-19
1-20
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1787 of 2287
5 As you can see from the excerpt above, the demolition phase was increased by 15%, from the default value of 20 to 23 days; the grading phase was increased by 1,800%, from the default value of 4 to 76 days; the building construction phase was increased by 231%, from the default value of 200 to 662 days; the architectural coating phase was increased by 3,700%, from the default value of 10 to 380 days; and the paving phase was increased by 560%, from the default value of 10 to 66 days. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.5 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is: “Construction schedule per applicant” (Appendix A, pp. 71, 103, 154). Furthermore, regarding the Project’s anticipated construction schedule, the SCEA states:
“Construction of the proposed Project is projected to take approximately 35 months, with construction anticipated to begin in August 2022 and continue through June 2025.44 Construction activities would fall into four principal phases: (1) demolition; (2) grading; (3) site improvements, including paving; and (4) building construction” (p. 2.0-27).
However, these justifications are insufficient. While the SCEA indicates the total construction duration, the SCEA fails to mention or justify the individual construction phase lengths. This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User’s Guide:
“CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or projectspecific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA.” 6
Here, as the SCEA only justifies the total construction duration of 35 months, the SCEA fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised individual construction phase lengths. As such, we cannot verify the changes.
These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as the construction emissions are improperly spread out over a longer period of time for some phases, but not for others. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).7 5 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.
6 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13-14.
7 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 32.
1-20
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1788 of 2287
6 As such, by disproportionately altering the individual construction phase lengths without proper justification, the model may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with some phases of construction. Thus, the model should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
Incorrect Application of Area-Related Operational Mitigation Measures Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Alta Cuvee Mixed-Use Project” model includes the following area-related operational mitigation measures (see excerpt below) (Attachment A, pp. 72, 77, 79; Appendix F, pp. 70, 75, 77):
As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.8 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for these changes is:
“Consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings” (Appendix A, pp. 71, 103, 154).
Furthermore, the SCEA incorporates mitigation measure SCAG EIR PMM-AQ-1, which states:
“Architectural coatings and solvents applied during construction activities shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113, which governs the VOC content of architectural coatings” (p. 3.0-19). 8 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.
1-20
1-21
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1789 of 2287
7 However, the inclusion of the above-mentioned operational mitigation measures remains unsupported for two reasons.
First, as previously discussed, the SCAQMD Rule 1113 alone cannot substantiate the use of low VOC paint. Without more information regarding what category of coating will be used, we cannot verify the inclusion of the above-mentioned mitigation measures.
Second, the inclusion of the operational mitigation measures, based on the Project’s purported compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1113, is unsupported. As previously stated, according to the AEP CEQA Portal Topic Paper on mitigation measures:
“By definition, mitigation measures are not part of the original project design. Rather, mitigation measures are actions taken by the lead agency to reduce impacts to the environment resulting from the original project design. Mitigation measures are identified by the lead agency after the project has undergone environmental review and are above-and-beyond existing laws, regulations, and requirements that would reduce environmental impacts.” 9 As you can see in the excerpt above, mitigation measures “are not part of the original project design” and are intended to go “above-and-beyond” existing regulatory requirements. As such, the inclusion of these measures, based on the Project’s compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1113, is unsubstantiated. As a result, the inclusion of the above-mentioned operational mitigation measures in the model is incorrect.
By including several operational mitigation measures without properly committing to their implementation, the model may underestimate the Project’s operational emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to more accurately estimate Project’s construction-related emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the SCEA. In our updated model, we proportionately altered the individual construction phase lengths to match the proposed construction duration of 35 months, omitted the unsubstantiated changes to the architectural and area coating emission factors and areas, and excluded the incorrect area-related operational mitigation measures.
Our updated analysis estimates that the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions exceed the applicable SCAQMD threshold of 75 pounds per day (“lbs/day”) (see table below).10 9 “CEQA Portal Topic Paper Mitigation Measures.” AEP, February 2020, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/tp/CEQA%20Mitigation%202020.pdf, p. 5. 10 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 1-21
1-22
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1790 of 2287
8 SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Quality Emissions
Construction
VOC
(lbs/day)
SCEA 8.31
SWAPE 86.24
% Increase 938%
SCAQMD Threshold (lbs/day) 75
Exceeds? Yes
As you can see in the excerpt above, the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 938% and exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold.
Thus, our model demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed in the SCEA. As a result, an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment.
Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The SCEA concludes that the maximum cancer risks at the Project site from diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions generated by diesel-vehicle travel along SR-134 for residents and workers are 1.06 and 7.55 in one hundred million, respectively (p. 5.0-28, Table 5.3-5). However, regarding the health risk impacts associated with Project construction or operation, the SCEA concludes that the proposed Project would have a less-than-significant impact based on a localized significance threshold (“LST”) analysis, without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis (“HRA”) (p. 5.0- 27, Table 5.3-3, Table 5.3-4). Specifically, regarding the health risk impacts associated with constructionrelated toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions, the SCEA states:
“Proposed Project construction would result in short-term emissions of diesel particulate matter, which is a Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC). Diesel particulate matter poses a carcinogenic health risk that is generally measured using an exposure period of 30 years for sensitive residential receptors. Off-road heavy-duty diesel equipment would emit diesel particulate matter over the course of the construction period. Diesel particulate matter is a source of PM2.5 (diesel particles are typically 2.5 microns and smaller). As shown in Table 5.3-3 localized diesel particulate matter would be below localized thresholds and there would be no significant impacts to the sensitive receptors located around the Project site”.
As demonstrated above, the SCEA concludes less-than-significant construction-related TAC impacts because PM2.5 emissions do not exceed localized thresholds. Furthermore, regarding the Project’s operational health risk impacts, the SCEA simply states:
“As shown in Table 5.3-4, emissions would not exceed the localized significance thresholds for operation. Therefore, localized operational impacts to sensitive receptors located around the Project site would be less than significant” (p. 5.0-28). 1-22
1-23
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1791 of 2287
9 As demonstrated above, the SCEA fails to mention TAC emissions associated with Project operation. As such, the SCEA’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent lessthan-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for four reasons.
First, the use of an LST analysis to determine the health risk impacts posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of the Project’s construction-related and operational TAC emissions is incorrect.
While the LST method assesses the impact of pollutants at a local level, it only evaluates impacts from criteria air pollutants. According to the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document prepared by the SCAQMD, the LST analysis is only applicable to NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions, which are collectively referred to as criteria air pollutants.11 Because the LST method can only be applied to criteria air pollutants, this method cannot be used to determine whether emissions from TACs, specifically DPM, a known human carcinogen, would result in a significant health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors. As a result, health impacts from exposure to TACs, such as DPM, were not analyzed, thus leaving a gap in the SCEA’s analysis.
Second, the SCEA fails to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s construction-related and operational TACs or make a reasonable effort to connect these emissions to potential health risk impacts posed to nearby existing sensitive receptors. This is incorrect, as construction of the proposed Project will produce emissions of DPM through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a potential construction duration of 35 months (p. 2.0-27). Furthermore, the Transportation Impact Analysis (“TIA”), provided as Appendix E to the SCEA, indicates that the proposed land uses are expected to generate approximately 1,198 average daily vehicle trips, which will generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (p. 26). However, the SCEA fails to evaluate the potential Project-generated TACs or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect the Project’s constructionrelated and operational TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the SCEA is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate the increase in emissions generated by the Project with the potential adverse impacts on human health. 12
Third, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015.13 This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. As the Project’s construction duration vastly exceeds the 2-month requirement set forth by OEHHA, it is clear that the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified 11 “Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology.” SCAQMD, Revised July 2008, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lstmethodology-document.pdf. 12 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf. 13 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/hotspots2015.html 1-23
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1792 of 2287
10 HRA under OEHHA guidance. Furthermore, the OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”). Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more.
Therefore, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30- year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 6-month requirement set forth by OEHHA. These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, we recommend that an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-generated DPM emissions be included in an EIR for the Project.
Fourth, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors, the SCEA fails to compare the Project’s combined excess cancer risk to the applicable SCAQMD numeric threshold of 10 in one million.14 Thus, pursuant to CEQA and SCAQMD guidance, an analysis of the health risk posed to nearby, existing receptors from Project construction and operation should have been conducted.
Screening-Level Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct our screening-level risk analysis we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.15 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA16 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”)17 guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening analyses (“HRSAs”). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project.
In order to estimate the health risk impacts posed to residential sensitive receptors as a result of the Project’s construction-related and operational TAC emissions, we prepared a preliminary HRA using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the CalEEMod output files included in the SCEA. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. The SCEA’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 528 pounds of DPM over the 1,049-day construction period.18 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from 14 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 15 U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf 16 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf 17 CAPCOA (July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 18 See Attachment B for calculations.
1-23
1-24
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1793 of 2287
11 point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:
𝐸𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 (
𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑠
𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑) =
528.1 𝑙𝑏𝑠
1,049 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 ×
453.6 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑠
𝑙𝑏𝑠 ×
1 𝑑𝑎𝑦
24 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
×
1 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟
3,600 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟐𝟔𝟒 𝒈/𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00264 grams per second (“g/s”).
Subtracting the 1,049-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 27.13 years, approximately.19 The SCEA’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 87 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation:
𝐸𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 (
𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑠
𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑) =
86.6 𝑙𝑏𝑠
365 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 ×
453.6 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑠
𝑙𝑏𝑠 ×
1 𝑑𝑎𝑦
24 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
×
1 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟
3,600 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟐𝟓 𝒈/𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00125 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 1.46-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with approximate dimensions of 109- by 54-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Glendale was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.20 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.21 The SCEA indicates that the nearest sensitive receptors are residences 200 feet, or approximately 61 meters, from the Project site (p. 5.0-26). Thus, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 7.094 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 75 meters downwind.
Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of
0.7094 µg/m3for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 3.343 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 75 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.3343 µg/m3for Project operation at the MEIR.
We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by 19 See Attachment B for calculations.
20 “Redlands.” United States Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0630000 21 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” EPA, 1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf p. 4-36. 1-24
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1794 of 2287
12 OEHHA. Consistent with the 1,049-day construction schedule included in the Project’s CalEEMod output files, the annualized average concentration for Project construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years), as well as the first 0.62 years of the child stage of life; and the annualized averaged concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the remaining 13.38 years of the child stage of life, and the entire adult stage of life (16 – 30 years).
Consistent with OEHHA guidance and recommended by the SCAQMD, BAAQMD, and SJVAPCD guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors (“ASF”) to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution.22, 23, 24 According to this guidance, the quantified cancer risk should be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the first two years of life (infant), as well as multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 – 16 years).
We also included the quantified cancer risk without adjusting for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution in accordance with older OEHHA guidance from 2003. This guidance utilizes a less health protective scenario than what is currently recommended by SCAQMD, the air quality district with jurisdiction over the City, and several other air districts in the state.
Furthermore, in accordance with the guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th percentile breathing rates for infants.25 Finally, according to SCAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home (“FAH”) Value of 1 for the 3rd trimester, infant, and child receptors, and a FAH value of 0.73 for adult receptors.
26 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day)-1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days. The results of our calculations are shown below.
22 “Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCEA) for the Proposed The Exchange (SCH No. 2018071058).” SCAQMD, March 2019, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/commentletters/2019/march/RVC190115-03.pdf?sfvrsn=8, p. 4. 23 “California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.” BAAQMD, May 2017, available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa_guidelines_may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 56; see also “Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards.” BAAQMD, May 2011, available at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20Modeling %20Approach.ashx, p. 65, 86.
24 “Update to District’s Risk Management Policy to Address OEHHA’s Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document.” SJVAPCD, May 2015, available at: https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pdf, p. 8, 20, 24.
25 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act,” July 2018, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/riskassessment/ab2588supplementalguidelines.pdf, p. 16. “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf 26 “Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/ProposedRules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7. 1-24
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1795 of 2287
13 The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions
Source
Duration
(years)
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Breathing
Rate (L/kg-day)
Cancer Risk
(without ASFs*) ASF Cancer Risk(with ASFs*)
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.7094 361 9.65E-07 10 9.65E-06 Infant
(Age 0 - 2) Construction 2 0.7094 1090 2.33E-05 10 2.33E-04 Construction 0.62 0.7094 572 3.82E-06
Operation 13.38 0.3343 572 3.85E-05
Child
(Age 2 - 16) Total 14 4.24E-05 3 1.27E-04
Adult
(Age 16 - 30) Operation 14 0.3343 261 1.34E-05 1 1.34E-05 Lifetime 30 8.01E-05 3.83E-04
* We, along with CARB and SCAQMD, recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHA guidance, which includes ASFs.
As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 75 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing ASFs, is approximately 9.65, 233, 127, and 13.4 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), utilizing ASFs, is approximately 383 in one million. The infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the SCEA.
Utilizing ASFs is the most conservative, health-protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and reflects recommendations from the air district. Results without ASFs are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless, excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 75 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without ASFs, are approximately 0.966, 23.3, 42.4, and 13.4 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years), without ASFs, is approximately 80.1 in one million. While we recommend the use of ASFs, the Project’s infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks without ASFs, as estimated by SWAPE, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million regardless, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the SCEA.
An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project’s air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to 1-24
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1796 of 2287
14 be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. 27 The purpose of the screening-level construction and operational HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project’s emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-date, applicable guidance are used. Therefore, our screening-level HRA indicates a potentially significant impact, the City should prepare an EIR analysis with an HRA which makes a reasonable effort to connect the Project’s air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors. Thus, the City should prepare an updated, quantified air pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.
Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The SCEA estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,773 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”) (see excerpt below) (p. 5.0-84, Table 5.8-7) However, the SCEA elects not to compare emissions to a threshold. Rather, the SCEA’s analysis relies upon the Project’s consistency with SCAG’s 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the Greener Glendale Plan, and the South Glendale Community Plan EIR (p. 5.0-85 - 5.0-88). However, the SCEA’s analysis, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for two reasons:
(1) The SCEA’s quantitative GHG analysis relies upon an unsubstantiated air model; and (2) The SCEA fails to identify a potentially significant greenhouse gas impact; 27 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 1-5 1-24
1-25
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1797 of 2287
15 1) Unsubstantiated Quantitative Analysis of Emissions As previously stated, the SCEA estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,773 MT CO2e/year (p. 5.0-84, Table 5.8-7). However, the SCEA’s quantitative GHG analysis is unsubstantiated. As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Project's CalEEMod output files, provided in the AQ & GHG Study as Appendix A to the SCEA, we found that several of the values inputted into the model are not consistent with information disclosed in the SCEA. As a result, the model underestimates the Project’s emissions, and the SCEA’s quantitative GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. An EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operation of the proposed Project may have on the surrounding environment.
2) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions, we compared the Project’s GHG emissions, as estimated by the SCEA, to the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.28 When applying the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, the Project’s incorrect and unsubstantiated air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact. 29 As previously stated, the SCEA estimates that
the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 2,773 MT CO2e/year (p. 5.0-84, Table 5.8-7).
According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.”30 The SCEA indicates that the Project would generate approximately 765 new residents (p. 3.0-9). As the Project only proposes residential land uses, we estimate a service population of 765 people. 31 When dividing the Project’s net
annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the SCEA, by a service population of 765 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 3.6 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).32 28 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqasignificance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 29 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqasignificance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 30 CAPCOA (Jan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, p. 71-72, http://www.capcoa.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf. 31 Calculated: 765 residents + 0 employees = 765 service population. 32 Calculated: (2,773 MT CO2e/year) / (765 service population) = (3.6 MT CO2e/SP/year). 1-26
1-27
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1798 of 2287
16 SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Project Phase Proposed Project
Total Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 2,773.00
Service Population 765
Service Population Efficiency (MT CO2e/SP/year) 3.6
SCAQMD Population Efficiency 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated above, the Project’s service population efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the SCEA. As a result, the SCEA’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. An EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to less-thansignificant levels.
Design Features Should Be Included as Mitigation Measures Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. We recommend that the SCEA implement all project design features and regulatory compliance measures as formal mitigation measures. As a result, we could guarantee that these measures would be implemented, monitored, and enforced on the Project site. Including formal mitigation measures by properly committing to their implementation would result in verifiable emissions reductions that may help reduce emissions to less-than-significant levels.
Furthermore, in an effort to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project. Therefore, to reduce the Project’s emissions, we recommend consideration of SCAG’s 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR’sGreenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures (“PMM-GHG-1”), as described below:
33 SCAG RTP/SCS 2020-2045
Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures – PMM-GHG-1 In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency:
33 “4.0 Mitigation Measures.” Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum #1, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/fpeir_connectsocal_addendum_4_mitigationmeasures.pdf?1606004420, p. 4.0-2 – 4.0-10; 4.0-19 –
4.0-23; See also: “Certified Final Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report.” Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), May 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/peir. 1-27
1-28
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1799 of 2287
17 b) Reduce emissions resulting from projects through implementation of project features, project design, or other measures, such as those described in Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines. c) Include off-site measures to mitigate a project’s emissions. d) Measures that consider incorporation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) during design, construction and operation of projects to minimize GHG emissions, including but not limited to:
i. Use energy and fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment; ii. Deployment of zero- and/or near zero emission technologies; iii. Use lighting systems that are energy efficient, such as LED technology; iv. Use the minimum feasible amount of GHG-emitting construction materials; v. Use cement blended with the maximum feasible amount of flash or other materials that reduce GHG emissions from cement production;
vi. Incorporate design measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse;
vii. Incorporate design measures to reduce energy consumption and increase use of renewable energy;
viii. Incorporate design measures to reduce water consumption; ix. Use lighter-colored pavement where feasible;
x. Recycle construction debris to maximum extent feasible; xi. Plant shade trees in or near construction projects where feasible; and xii. Solicit bids that include concepts listed above.
e) Measures that encourage transit use, carpooling, bike-share and car-share programs, active transportation, and parking strategies, including, but not limited to the following:
i. Promote transit-active transportation coordinated strategies; ii. Increase bicycle carrying capacity on transit and rail vehicles; iii. Improve or increase access to transit;
iv. Increase access to common goods and services, such as groceries, schools, and day care; v. Incorporate affordable housing into the project;
vi. Incorporate the neighborhood electric vehicle network; vii. Orient the project toward transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; viii. Improve pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service; ix. Provide traffic calming measures;
x. Provide bicycle parking;
xi. Limit or eliminate park supply;
xii. Unbundle parking costs;
xiii. Provide parking cash-out programs;
xiv. Implement or provide access to commute reduction program; f) Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities into project designs, maintaining these facilities, and providing amenities incentivizing their use; and planning for and building local bicycle projects that connect with the regional network;
g) Improving transit access to rail and bus routes by incentives for construction and transit facilities within developments, and/or providing dedicated shuttle service to transit stations; and h) Adopting employer trip reduction measures to reduce employee trips such as vanpool and carpool programs, providing end-of-trip facilities, and telecommuting programs including but not limited to measures that:
i. Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, and ride-sharing programs; ii. Provide transit passes;
1-28
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1800 of 2287
18 iii. Shift single occupancy vehicle trips to carpooling or vanpooling, for example providing ridematching services; iv. Provide incentives or subsidies that increase that use of modes other than single-occupancy vehicle;
v. Provide on-site amenities at places of work, such as priority parking for carpools and vanpools, secure bike parking, and showers and locker rooms;
vi. Provide employee transportation coordinators at employment sites; vii. Provide a guaranteed ride home service to users of non-auto modes. i) Designate a percentage of parking spaces for ride-sharing vehicles or high-occupancy vehicles, and provide adequate passenger loading and unloading for those vehicles; j) Land use siting and design measures that reduce GHG emissions, including:
i. Developing on infill and brownfields sites;
ii. Building compact and mixed-use developments near transit; iii. Retaining on-site mature trees and vegetation, and planting new canopy trees; iv. Measures that increase vehicle efficiency, encourage use of zero and low emissions vehicles, or reduce the carbon content of fuels, including constructing or encouraging construction of electric vehicle charging stations or neighborhood electric vehicle networks, or charging for electric bicycles; and
v. Measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse.
k) Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities. The measures provided above are also intended to be applied in low income and minority communities as applicable and feasible.
l) Require at least five percent of all vehicle parking spaces include electric vehicle charging stations, or at a minimum, require the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for passenger vehicles and trucks to plug-in.
m) Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules, such as:
i. Staggered starting times
ii. Flexible schedules
iii. Compressed work weeks
n) Implement commute trip reduction marketing, such as:
i. New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options ii. Event promotions
iii. Publications
o) Implement preferential parking permit program
p) Implement school pool and bus programs
q) Price workplace parking, such as:
i. Explicitly charging for parking for its employees;
ii. Implementing above market rate pricing;
iii. Validating parking only for invited guests;
iv. Not providing employee parking and transportation allowances; and v. Educating employees about available alternatives.
These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation. An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include an 1-28
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1801 of 2287
19 updated air quality, health risk, and GHG analysis to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.
Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.
Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Attachment A: Construction Calculations
Attachment B: CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment C: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment D: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment E: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment F: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV
1-28
1-29
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1802 of 2287
Phase
Default Phase
Length
Construction
Duration %
Construction
Duration
Revised Phase
Length
Demolition 20 339 0.0590 1049 62
Grading 4 339 0.0118 1049 12
Construction 200 339 0.5900 1049 619
Architectural Coating 10 339 0.0295 1049 31
Paving 10 339 0.0295 1049 31
Total Default
Construction
Duration
Revised
Construction
Duration
Start Date 8/1/2022 8/1/2022
End Date 7/6/2023 6/15/2025
Total Days 339 1049
Construction Schedule Calculations
Attachment A
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1803 of 2287
Lucia Park - Project
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Land Use - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Trips and VMT - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Demolition - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Grading - Total arces graded less than SCEA's model.
Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors and Areas" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the SCEA's model.
Woodstoves - Consistent with the SCEA's model.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 502.00 Space 0.00 200,800.00 0 Apartments High Rise 294.00 Dwelling Unit 1.23 417,135.00 841
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Glendale Water and Power
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
948.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment B
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1804 of 2287
Water Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Energy Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 7.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1805 of 2287
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 62.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 12.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 619.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 31.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 31.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.70 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 76,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 294,000.00 417,135.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.52 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.74 1.23
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 6.80
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.53 4.32
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 3.59 3.42
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.45 4.24
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1806 of 2287
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1244 1.2778 1.0626 3.2000e0030.1628 0.0441 0.2070 0.0506 0.0416 0.0922 0.0000 296.1661 296.1661 0.0339 0.0225 303.7126 2023 0.3296 1.9547 3.0795 8.0800e0030.4741 0.0711 0.5452 0.1271 0.0685 0.1956 0.0000 727.2013 727.2013 0.0541 0.0305 737.6443 2024 0.3101 1.8752 2.9974 8.0100e0030.4778 0.0632 0.5409 0.1281 0.0608 0.1889 0.0000 723.4875 723.4875 0.0529 0.0298 733.6939 2025 1.4151 0.5168 0.8731 2.1900e0030.1235 0.0176 0.1411 0.0331 0.0168 0.0499 0.0000 197.5435 197.5435 0.0182 6.9500e003200.0680 Maximum 1.4151 1.9547 3.0795 8.0800e0030.4778 0.0711 0.5452 0.1281 0.0685 0.1956 0.0000 727.2013 727.2013 0.0541 0.0305 737.6443 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1807 of 2287
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0651 1.0894 1.1388 3.2000e0030.1628 0.0415 0.2043 0.0506 0.0413 0.0919 0.0000 296.1659 296.1659 0.0339 0.0225 303.7125 2023 0.2149 2.0023 3.1923 8.0800e0030.4741 0.0993 0.5734 0.1271 0.0990 0.2262 0.0000 727.2010 727.2010 0.0541 0.0305 737.6440 2024 0.2080 2.0079 3.1234 8.0100e0030.4778 0.1000 0.5777 0.1281 0.0997 0.2278 0.0000 723.4872 723.4872 0.0529 0.0298 733.6936 2025 1.3886 0.5912 0.9215 2.1900e0030.1235 0.0308 0.1542 0.0331 0.0307 0.0638 0.0000 197.5434 197.5434 0.0182 6.9500e003200.0679 Maximum 1.3886 2.0079 3.1923 8.0800e0030.4778 0.1000 0.5777 0.1281 0.0997 0.2278 0.0000 727.2010 727.2010 0.0541 0.0305 737.6440 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
13.89 -1.18 -4.53 0.00 0.00 -38.52 -5.26 0.00 -44.21 -15.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 8-1-2022 10-31-2022 0.7445 0.5544
2 11-1-2022 1-31-2023 0.8275 0.7678
3 2-1-2023 4-30-2023 0.5575 0.5411
4 5-1-2023 7-31-2023 0.5708 0.5539
5 8-1-2023 10-31-2023 0.5736 0.5566
6 11-1-2023 1-31-2024 0.5692 0.5606
7 2-1-2024 4-30-2024 0.5353 0.5428
8 5-1-2024 7-31-2024 0.5418 0.5495
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1808 of 2287
9 8-1-2024 10-31-2024 0.5445 0.5522
10 11-1-2024 1-31-2025 0.5400 0.5560
11 2-1-2025 4-30-2025 0.3801 0.4123
12 5-1-2025 7-31-2025 1.3621 1.3667
Highest 1.3621 1.3667
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.7512 0.0868 3.0575 4.9000e0040.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 64.9753 64.9753 5.9300e0031.1000e00365.4513 Energy 0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 1,126.266 6 1,126.266
6 0.0365 7.1300e0031,129.304
6 Mobile 0.6262 0.7055 6.4840 0.0143 1.5606 0.0105 1.5711 0.4164 9.7100e0030.4261 0.0000 1,353.956 0 1,353.956
0 0.0906 0.0571 1,373.238
8 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 27.4525 0.0000 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0771 165.1151 171.1922 0.6299 0.0154 191.5395 Total 2.3944 0.9380 9.6035 0.0157 1.5606 0.0433 1.6039 0.4164 0.0425 0.4589 33.5296 2,710.312 9 2,743.842
5 2.3854 0.0808 2,827.546
6 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1809 of 2287
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.7512 0.0868 3.0575 4.9000e0040.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 64.9753 64.9753 5.9300e0031.1000e00365.4513 Energy 0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 1,112.832 0 1,112.832
0 0.0361 7.0700e0031,115.841
5 Mobile 0.6262 0.7055 6.4840 0.0143 1.5606 0.0105 1.5711 0.4164 9.7100e0030.4261 0.0000 1,353.956 0 1,353.956
0 0.0906 0.0571 1,373.238
8 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 27.4525 0.0000 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.8617 140.1196 144.9812 0.5042 0.0124 161.2761 Total 2.3944 0.9380 9.6035 0.0157 1.5606 0.0433 1.6039 0.4164 0.0425 0.4589 32.3142 2,671.882 9 2,704.197
1 2.2592 0.0777 2,783.820
2 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/1/2022 10/25/2022 5 62
2 Grading Grading 10/26/2022 11/10/2022 5 12
3 Building Construction Building Construction 11/11/2022 3/26/2025 5 619 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.62 1.42 1.44 5.29 3.85 1.55 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1810 of 2287
4 Paving Paving 3/27/2025 5/8/2025 5 31
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/9/2025 6/20/2025 5 31 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Residential Indoor: 844,698; Residential Outdoor: 281,566; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area:
12,048 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 12
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1811 of 2287
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 150.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 9,500.00 14.70 6.90 6.80 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 296.00 64.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 59.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1812 of 2287
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 2.4500e0030.0000 2.4500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0524 0.5153 0.4328 7.5000e0040.0260 0.0260 0.0243 0.0243 0.0000 65.3408 65.3408 0.0167 0.0000 65.7571 Total 0.0524 0.5153 0.4328 7.5000e0040.0162 0.0260 0.0422 2.4500e0030.0243 0.0267 0.0000 65.3408 65.3408 0.0167 0.0000 65.7571 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.5000e0040.0133 2.9600e0035.0000e0051.2900e0039.0000e0051.3800e0033.5000e0049.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 4.6325 4.6325 2.5000e0047.4000e0044.8577 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3800e0031.1500e0030.0150 4.0000e0054.4200e0033.0000e0054.4400e0031.1700e0033.0000e0051.2000e0030.0000 3.6555 3.6555 1.0000e0041.0000e0043.6877 Total 1.7300e0030.0144 0.0179 9.0000e0055.7100e0031.2000e0045.8200e0031.5200e0031.2000e0041.6400e0030.0000 8.2880 8.2880 3.5000e0048.4000e0048.5454 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1813 of 2287
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0162 0.0000 0.0162 2.4500e0030.0000 2.4500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0174 0.3752 0.4779 7.5000e0040.0223 0.0223 0.0223 0.0223 0.0000 65.3407 65.3407 0.0167 0.0000 65.7570 Total 0.0174 0.3752 0.4779 7.5000e0040.0162 0.0223 0.0384 2.4500e0030.0223 0.0247 0.0000 65.3407 65.3407 0.0167 0.0000 65.7570 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.5000e0040.0133 2.9600e0035.0000e0051.2900e0039.0000e0051.3800e0033.5000e0049.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 4.6325 4.6325 2.5000e0047.4000e0044.8577 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3800e0031.1500e0030.0150 4.0000e0054.4200e0033.0000e0054.4400e0031.1700e0033.0000e0051.2000e0030.0000 3.6555 3.6555 1.0000e0041.0000e0043.6877 Total 1.7300e0030.0144 0.0179 9.0000e0055.7100e0031.2000e0045.8200e0031.5200e0031.2000e0041.6400e0030.0000 8.2880 8.2880 3.5000e0048.4000e0048.5454 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1814 of 2287
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0468 0.0000 0.0468 0.0212 0.0000 0.0212 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.2400e0030.1019 0.0553 1.2000e0044.4500e0034.4500e0034.1000e0034.1000e0030.0000 10.8616 10.8616 3.5100e0030.0000 10.9495 Total 9.2400e0030.1019 0.0553 1.2000e0040.0468 4.4500e0030.0512 0.0212 4.1000e0030.0253 0.0000 10.8616 10.8616 3.5100e0030.0000 10.9495 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0107 0.3465 0.1078 1.0900e0030.0279 2.0600e0030.0299 7.6600e0031.9700e0039.6300e0030.0000 108.1205 108.1205 5.5100e0030.0172 113.3690 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e0041.7000e0042.2300e0031.0000e0056.6000e0040.0000 6.6000e0041.7000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.5442 0.5442 2.0000e0051.0000e0050.5490 Total 0.0109 0.3467 0.1101 1.1000e0030.0285 2.0600e0030.0306 7.8300e0031.9700e0039.8100e0030.0000 108.6647 108.6647 5.5300e0030.0172 113.9180 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1815 of 2287
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0468 0.0000 0.0468 0.0212 0.0000 0.0212 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.0300e0030.0613 0.0729 1.2000e0042.9100e0032.9100e0032.9100e0032.9100e0030.0000 10.8616 10.8616 3.5100e0030.0000 10.9494 Total 3.0300e0030.0613 0.0729 1.2000e0040.0468 2.9100e0030.0497 0.0212 2.9100e0030.0241 0.0000 10.8616 10.8616 3.5100e0030.0000 10.9494 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0107 0.3465 0.1078 1.0900e0030.0279 2.0600e0030.0299 7.6600e0031.9700e0039.6300e0030.0000 108.1205 108.1205 5.5100e0030.0172 113.3690 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e0041.7000e0042.2300e0031.0000e0056.6000e0040.0000 6.6000e0041.7000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.5442 0.5442 2.0000e0051.0000e0050.5490 Total 0.0109 0.3467 0.1101 1.1000e0030.0285 2.0600e0030.0306 7.8300e0031.9700e0039.8100e0030.0000 108.6647 108.6647 5.5300e0030.0172 113.9180 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1816 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0297 0.2251 0.2291 4.0000e0040.0106 0.0106 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 32.6838 32.6838 5.6900e0030.0000 32.8262 Total 0.0297 0.2251 0.2291 4.0000e0040.0106 0.0106 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 32.6838 32.6838 5.6900e0030.0000 32.8262 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.2500e0030.0592 0.0197 2.3000e0047.2600e0035.4000e0047.8000e0032.1000e0035.1000e0042.6100e0030.0000 21.9984 21.9984 7.3000e0043.1700e00322.9623 Worker 0.0183 0.0152 0.1978 5.2000e0040.0584 3.8000e0040.0588 0.0155 3.5000e0040.0159 0.0000 48.3287 48.3287 1.3800e0031.3100e00348.7542 Total 0.0205 0.0745 0.2175 7.5000e0040.0656 9.2000e0040.0666 0.0176 8.6000e0040.0185 0.0000 70.3271 70.3271 2.1100e0034.4800e00371.7166 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1817 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0115 0.2174 0.2426 4.0000e0040.0132 0.0132 0.0132 0.0132 0.0000 32.6838 32.6838 5.6900e0030.0000 32.8261 Total 0.0115 0.2174 0.2426 4.0000e0040.0132 0.0132 0.0132 0.0132 0.0000 32.6838 32.6838 5.6900e0030.0000 32.8261 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.2500e0030.0592 0.0197 2.3000e0047.2600e0035.4000e0047.8000e0032.1000e0035.1000e0042.6100e0030.0000 21.9984 21.9984 7.3000e0043.1700e00322.9623 Worker 0.0183 0.0152 0.1978 5.2000e0040.0584 3.8000e0040.0588 0.0155 3.5000e0040.0159 0.0000 48.3287 48.3287 1.3800e0031.3100e00348.7542 Total 0.0205 0.0745 0.2175 7.5000e0040.0656 9.2000e0040.0666 0.0176 8.6000e0040.0185 0.0000 70.3271 70.3271 2.1100e0034.4800e00371.7166 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1818 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1980 1.5224 1.6394 2.8700e0030.0669 0.0669 0.0646 0.0646 0.0000 236.0789 236.0789 0.0401 0.0000 237.0811 Total 0.1980 1.5224 1.6394 2.8700e0030.0669 0.0669 0.0646 0.0646 0.0000 236.0789 236.0789 0.0401 0.0000 237.0811 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.4000e0030.3353 0.1255 1.5500e0030.0524 1.6100e0030.0540 0.0151 1.5400e0030.0167 0.0000 151.2761 151.2761 5.0600e0030.0218 157.8902 Worker 0.1222 0.0970 1.3146 3.6600e0030.4217 2.6000e0030.4243 0.1120 2.3900e0030.1144 0.0000 339.8463 339.8463 8.9300e0038.7400e003342.6731 Total 0.1316 0.4323 1.4401 5.2100e0030.4741 4.2100e0030.4783 0.1271 3.9300e0030.1311 0.0000 491.1224 491.1224 0.0140 0.0305 500.5633 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1819 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0833 1.5700 1.7522 2.8700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 236.0786 236.0786 0.0401 0.0000 237.0808 Total 0.0833 1.5700 1.7522 2.8700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 236.0786 236.0786 0.0401 0.0000 237.0808 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.4000e0030.3353 0.1255 1.5500e0030.0524 1.6100e0030.0540 0.0151 1.5400e0030.0167 0.0000 151.2761 151.2761 5.0600e0030.0218 157.8902 Worker 0.1222 0.0970 1.3146 3.6600e0030.4217 2.6000e0030.4243 0.1120 2.3900e0030.1144 0.0000 339.8463 339.8463 8.9300e0038.7400e003342.6731 Total 0.1316 0.4323 1.4401 5.2100e0030.4741 4.2100e0030.4783 0.1271 3.9300e0030.1311 0.0000 491.1224 491.1224 0.0140 0.0305 500.5633 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1820 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1860 1.4494 1.6398 2.8900e0030.0590 0.0590 0.0570 0.0570 0.0000 237.9108 237.9108 0.0396 0.0000 238.9013 Total 0.1860 1.4494 1.6398 2.8900e0030.0590 0.0590 0.0570 0.0570 0.0000 237.9108 237.9108 0.0396 0.0000 238.9013 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.1700e0030.3386 0.1238 1.5400e0030.0528 1.6300e0030.0545 0.0153 1.5600e0030.0168 0.0000 150.1526 150.1526 5.1100e0030.0216 156.7263 Worker 0.1149 0.0873 1.2339 3.5800e0030.4249 2.5100e0030.4274 0.1129 2.3100e0030.1152 0.0000 335.4241 335.4241 8.1500e0038.1800e003338.0663 Total 0.1241 0.4258 1.3577 5.1200e0030.4778 4.1400e0030.4819 0.1281 3.8700e0030.1320 0.0000 485.5767 485.5767 0.0133 0.0298 494.7926 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1821 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0839 1.5820 1.7657 2.8900e0030.0958 0.0958 0.0958 0.0958 0.0000 237.9105 237.9105 0.0396 0.0000 238.9010 Total 0.0839 1.5820 1.7657 2.8900e0030.0958 0.0958 0.0958 0.0958 0.0000 237.9105 237.9105 0.0396 0.0000 238.9010 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.1700e0030.3386 0.1238 1.5400e0030.0528 1.6300e0030.0545 0.0153 1.5600e0030.0168 0.0000 150.1526 150.1526 5.1100e0030.0216 156.7263 Worker 0.1149 0.0873 1.2339 3.5800e0030.4249 2.5100e0030.4274 0.1129 2.3100e0030.1152 0.0000 335.4241 335.4241 8.1500e0038.1800e003338.0663 Total 0.1241 0.4258 1.3577 5.1200e0030.4778 4.1400e0030.4819 0.1281 3.8700e0030.1320 0.0000 485.5767 485.5767 0.0133 0.0298 494.7926 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1822 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0404 0.3176 0.3794 6.7000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 55.3978 55.3978 9.0400e0030.0000 55.6240 Total 0.0404 0.3176 0.3794 6.7000e0040.0120 0.0120 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 55.3978 55.3978 9.0400e0030.0000 55.6240 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0700e0030.0785 0.0283 3.5000e0040.0123 3.8000e0040.0127 3.5500e0033.6000e0043.9200e0030.0000 34.3303 34.3303 1.2000e0034.9500e00335.8349 Worker 0.0251 0.0182 0.2679 8.1000e0040.0989 5.6000e0040.0995 0.0263 5.1000e0040.0268 0.0000 76.1906 76.1906 1.7100e0031.7800e00376.7635 Total 0.0271 0.0967 0.2962 1.1600e0030.1112 9.4000e0040.1122 0.0298 8.7000e0040.0307 0.0000 110.5209 110.5209 2.9100e0036.7300e003112.5984 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1823 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0195 0.3683 0.4111 6.7000e0040.0223 0.0223 0.0223 0.0223 0.0000 55.3978 55.3978 9.0400e0030.0000 55.6239 Total 0.0195 0.3683 0.4111 6.7000e0040.0223 0.0223 0.0223 0.0223 0.0000 55.3978 55.3978 9.0400e0030.0000 55.6239 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0700e0030.0785 0.0283 3.5000e0040.0123 3.8000e0040.0127 3.5500e0033.6000e0043.9200e0030.0000 34.3303 34.3303 1.2000e0034.9500e00335.8349 Worker 0.0251 0.0182 0.2679 8.1000e0040.0989 5.6000e0040.0995 0.0263 5.1000e0040.0268 0.0000 76.1906 76.1906 1.7100e0031.7800e00376.7635 Total 0.0271 0.0967 0.2962 1.1600e0030.1112 9.4000e0040.1122 0.0298 8.7000e0040.0307 0.0000 110.5209 110.5209 2.9100e0036.7300e003112.5984 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1824 of 2287
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 8.8800e0030.0826 0.1363 2.1000e0043.8200e0033.8200e0033.5300e0033.5300e0030.0000 18.2490 18.2490 5.7900e0030.0000 18.3936 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.8800e0030.0826 0.1363 2.1000e0043.8200e0033.8200e0033.5300e0033.5300e0030.0000 18.2490 18.2490 5.7900e0030.0000 18.3936 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e0044.1000e0045.9800e0032.0000e0052.2100e0031.0000e0052.2200e0035.9000e0041.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 1.7005 1.7005 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.7133 Total 5.6000e0044.1000e0045.9800e0032.0000e0052.2100e0031.0000e0052.2200e0035.9000e0041.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 1.7005 1.7005 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.7133 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1825 of 2287
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.9500e0030.1029 0.1527 2.1000e0045.9900e0035.9900e0035.9900e0035.9900e0030.0000 18.2490 18.2490 5.7900e0030.0000 18.3936 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.9500e0030.1029 0.1527 2.1000e0045.9900e0035.9900e0035.9900e0035.9900e0030.0000 18.2490 18.2490 5.7900e0030.0000 18.3936 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e0044.1000e0045.9800e0032.0000e0052.2100e0031.0000e0052.2200e0035.9000e0041.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 1.7005 1.7005 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.7133 Total 5.6000e0044.1000e0045.9800e0032.0000e0052.2100e0031.0000e0052.2200e0035.9000e0041.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 1.7005 1.7005 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.7133 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1826 of 2287
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.3330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6500e0030.0178 0.0280 5.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 3.9575 3.9575 2.2000e0040.0000 3.9629 Total 1.3356 0.0178 0.0280 5.0000e0058.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0048.0000e0040.0000 3.9575 3.9575 2.2000e0040.0000 3.9629 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5400e0031.8500e0030.0271 8.0000e0050.0100 6.0000e0050.0101 2.6600e0035.0000e0052.7100e0030.0000 7.7178 7.7178 1.7000e0041.8000e0047.7758 Total 2.5400e0031.8500e0030.0271 8.0000e0050.0100 6.0000e0050.0101 2.6600e0035.0000e0052.7100e0030.0000 7.7178 7.7178 1.7000e0041.8000e0047.7758 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1827 of 2287
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.3330 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.2000e0040.0210 0.0284 5.0000e0051.4700e0031.4700e0031.4700e0031.4700e0030.0000 3.9575 3.9575 2.2000e0040.0000 3.9629 Total 1.3339 0.0210 0.0284 5.0000e0051.4700e0031.4700e0031.4700e0031.4700e0030.0000 3.9575 3.9575 2.2000e0040.0000 3.9629 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5400e0031.8500e0030.0271 8.0000e0050.0100 6.0000e0050.0101 2.6600e0035.0000e0052.7100e0030.0000 7.7178 7.7178 1.7000e0041.8000e0047.7758 Total 2.5400e0031.8500e0030.0271 8.0000e0050.0100 6.0000e0050.0101 2.6600e0035.0000e0052.7100e0030.0000 7.7178 7.7178 1.7000e0041.8000e0047.7758 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1828 of 2287
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.6262 0.7055 6.4840 0.0143 1.5606 0.0105 1.5711 0.4164 9.7100e0030.4261 0.0000 1,353.956 0 1,353.956
0 0.0906 0.0571 1,373.238
8 Unmitigated 0.6262 0.7055 6.4840 0.0143 1.5606 0.0105 1.5711 0.4164 9.7100e0030.4261 0.0000 1,353.956 0 1,353.956
0 0.0906 0.0571 1,373.238
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 1,246.56 1,270.08 1005.48 4,153,480 4,153,480 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,246.56 1,270.08 1,005.48 4,153,480 4,153,480
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments High Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1829 of 2287
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments High Rise 0.540171 0.064547 0.189075 0.126673 0.023412 0.006384 0.010926 0.008089 0.000929 0.000597 0.025155 0.000706 0.003335 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.540171 0.064547 0.189075 0.126673 0.023412 0.006384 0.010926 0.008089 0.000929 0.000597 0.025155 0.000706 0.003335
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 944.0595 944.0595 0.0328 3.9800e003946.0660 Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 957.4940 957.4940 0.0333 4.0400e003959.5291 NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 168.7726 168.7726 3.2300e0033.0900e003169.7755 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 168.7726 168.7726 3.2300e0033.0900e003169.7755
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1830 of 2287
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
3.16268e
+006
0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 168.7726 168.7726 3.2300e0033.0900e003169.7755 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 168.7726 168.7726 3.2300e0033.0900e003169.7755 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
3.16268e
+006
0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 168.7726 168.7726 3.2300e0033.0900e003169.7755 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0171 0.1457 0.0620 9.3000e0040.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0000 168.7726 168.7726 3.2300e0033.0900e003169.7755 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1831 of 2287
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
1.13205e
+006
487.2910 0.0170 2.0500e003488.3267
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
1.09235e
+006
470.2030 0.0164 1.9800e003471.2024
Total 957.4940 0.0333 4.0300e003959.5291
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
1.10084e
+006
473.8565 0.0165 2.0000e003474.8636
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
1.09235e
+006
470.2030 0.0164 1.9800e003471.2024
Total 944.0595 0.0328 3.9800e003946.0660
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1832 of 2287
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.7512 0.0868 3.0575 4.9000e0040.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 64.9753 64.9753 5.9300e0031.1000e00365.4513 Unmitigated 1.7512 0.0868 3.0575 4.9000e0040.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 64.9753 64.9753 5.9300e0031.1000e00365.4513 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1833 of 2287
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.1333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
1.5203 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 6.0600e0030.0518 0.0221 3.3000e0044.1900e0034.1900e0034.1900e0034.1900e0030.0000 60.0103 60.0103 1.1500e0031.1000e00360.3669 Landscaping 0.0915 0.0350 3.0354 1.6000e0040.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0000 4.9651 4.9651 4.7800e0030.0000 5.0844 Total 1.7512 0.0868 3.0575 4.9000e0040.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 64.9753 64.9753 5.9300e0031.1000e00365.4513 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1834 of 2287
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.1333 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products
1.5203 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 6.0600e0030.0518 0.0221 3.3000e0044.1900e0034.1900e0034.1900e0034.1900e0030.0000 60.0103 60.0103 1.1500e0031.1000e00360.3669 Landscaping 0.0915 0.0350 3.0354 1.6000e0040.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0168 0.0000 4.9651 4.9651 4.7800e0030.0000 5.0844 Total 1.7512 0.0868 3.0575 4.9000e0040.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0210 0.0000 64.9753 64.9753 5.9300e0031.1000e00365.4513 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1835 of 2287
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 144.9812 0.5042 0.0124 161.2761
Unmitigated 171.1922 0.6299 0.0154 191.5395
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
19.1553 /
12.0762
171.1922 0.6299 0.0154 191.5395
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 171.1922 0.6299 0.0154 191.5395
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1836 of 2287
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
15.3242 /
11.3395
144.9812 0.5042 0.0124 161.2761
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 144.9812 0.5042 0.0124 161.2761
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124
Unmitigated 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1837 of 2287
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
135.24 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
135.24 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 27.4525 1.6224 0.0000 68.0124
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1838 of 2287
11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 36 Date: 2/10/2022 4:30 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1839 of 2287
Lucia Park - Project
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Land Use - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Trips and VMT - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Demolition - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Grading - Total arces graded less than SCEA's model.
Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors and Areas" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the SCEA's model.
Woodstoves - Consistent with the SCEA's model.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 502.00 Space 0.00 200,800.00 0 Apartments High Rise 294.00 Dwelling Unit 1.23 417,135.00 841
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Glendale Water and Power
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
948.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1840 of 2287
Water Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Energy Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 7.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1841 of 2287
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 62.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 12.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 619.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 31.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 31.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.70 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 76,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 294,000.00 417,135.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.52 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.74 1.23
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 6.80
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.53 4.32
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 3.59 3.42
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.45 4.24
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1842 of 2287
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.3933 72.1171 27.3531 0.2031 12.6331 1.0860 13.7192 4.8586 1.0118 5.8704 0.0000 21,956.59 31 21,956.59
31 1.6632 3.1521 22,937.48
90 2023 2.5448 14.8277 24.2890 0.0633 3.7185 0.5468 4.2653 0.9955 0.5270 1.5225 0.0000 6,280.929 3 6,280.929
3 0.4575 0.2526 6,367.642
6 2024 2.3749 14.1155 23.4327 0.0622 3.7185 0.4822 4.2007 0.9955 0.4643 1.4598 0.0000 6,200.026 3 6,200.026
3 0.4440 0.2452 6,284.209
7 2025 86.3343 13.3929 22.6586 0.0611 3.7185 0.4232 4.1418 0.9955 0.4073 1.4028 0.0000 6,105.697 7 6,105.697
7 0.4312 0.2379 6,187.373
7 Maximum 86.3343 72.1171 27.3531 0.2031 12.6331 1.0860 13.7192 4.8586 1.0118 5.8704 0.0000 21,956.59 31 21,956.59
31 1.6632 3.1521 22,937.48
90 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1843 of 2287
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.3573 65.3485 30.2780 0.2031 12.6331 0.8288 13.4619 4.8586 0.8139 5.6725 0.0000 21,956.59 31 21,956.59
31 1.6632 3.1521 22,937.48
90 2023 1.6623 15.1941 25.1565 0.0633 3.7185 0.7638 4.4824 0.9955 0.7617 1.7572 0.0000 6,280.929 3 6,280.929
3 0.4575 0.2526 6,367.642
6 2024 1.5956 15.1283 24.3940 0.0622 3.7185 0.7631 4.4816 0.9955 0.7610 1.7565 0.0000 6,200.026 3 6,200.026
3 0.4440 0.2452 6,284.209
7 2025 86.2228 15.0568 23.6978 0.0611 3.7185 0.7622 4.4808 0.9955 0.7602 1.7557 0.0000 6,105.697 7 6,105.697
7 0.4312 0.2379 6,187.373
7 Maximum 86.2228 65.3485 30.2780 0.2031 12.6331 0.8288 13.4619 4.8586 0.8139 5.6725 0.0000 21,956.59 31 21,956.59
31 1.6632 3.1521 22,937.48
90 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
2.97 3.26 -5.93 0.00 0.00 -22.84 -2.20 0.00 -28.48 -6.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1844 of 2287
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Energy 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Mobile 3.7198 3.7012 37.6797 0.0847 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4900 8,852.874 7 8,852.874
7 0.5612 0.3444 8,969.527
4 Total 14.0914 8.9248 64.0670 0.1175 9.1381 0.5945 9.7326 2.4342 0.5902 3.0244 0.0000 15,208.05 57 15,208.05
57 0.7242 0.4601 15,363.26
67 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Energy 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Mobile 3.7198 3.7012 37.6797 0.0847 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4900 8,852.874 7 8,852.874
7 0.5612 0.3444 8,969.527
4 Total 14.0914 8.9248 64.0670 0.1175 9.1381 0.5945 9.7326 2.4342 0.5902 3.0244 0.0000 15,208.05 57 15,208.05
57 0.7242 0.4601 15,363.26
67 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1845 of 2287
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/1/2022 10/25/2022 5 62
2 Grading Grading 10/26/2022 11/10/2022 5 12
3 Building Construction Building Construction 11/11/2022 3/26/2025 5 619 4 Paving Paving 3/27/2025 5/8/2025 5 31
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/9/2025 6/20/2025 5 31 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 844,698; Residential Outdoor: 281,566; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area:
12,048 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 12
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1846 of 2287
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 150.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 9,500.00 14.70 6.90 6.80 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 296.00 64.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 59.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1847 of 2287
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5219 0.0000 0.5219 0.0790 0.0000 0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.5219 0.8379 1.3598 0.0790 0.7829 0.8619 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0113 0.4063 0.0947 1.5000e0030.0424 3.0200e0030.0454 0.0116 2.8900e0030.0145 164.7038 164.7038 8.7500e0030.0261 172.7099 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0329 0.5124 1.3300e0030.1453 9.3000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 135.2165 135.2165 3.6600e0033.2500e003136.2774 Total 0.0563 0.4392 0.6071 2.8300e0030.1877 3.9500e0030.1916 0.0502 3.7500e0030.0539 299.9203 299.9203 0.0124 0.0294 308.9873 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1848 of 2287
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5219 0.0000 0.5219 0.0790 0.0000 0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5621 12.1033 15.4154 0.0241 0.7182 0.7182 0.7182 0.7182 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 0.5621 12.1033 15.4154 0.0241 0.5219 0.7182 1.2401 0.0790 0.7182 0.7972 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0113 0.4063 0.0947 1.5000e0030.0424 3.0200e0030.0454 0.0116 2.8900e0030.0145 164.7038 164.7038 8.7500e0030.0261 172.7099 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0450 0.0329 0.5124 1.3300e0030.1453 9.3000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 135.2165 135.2165 3.6600e0033.2500e003136.2774 Total 0.0563 0.4392 0.6071 2.8300e0030.1877 3.9500e0030.1916 0.0502 3.7500e0030.0539 299.9203 299.9203 0.0124 0.0294 308.9873 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1849 of 2287
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.7988 0.0000 7.7988 3.5332 0.0000 3.5332 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.7988 0.7423 8.5411 3.5332 0.6829 4.2161 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.8183 55.1082 17.7389 0.1815 4.7225 0.3430 5.0656 1.2958 0.3282 1.6240 19,857.09 79 19,857.09
79 1.0150 3.1496 20,821.04
32 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0346 0.0253 0.3941 1.0200e0030.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 104.0127 104.0127 2.8200e0032.5000e003104.8288 Total 1.8530 55.1335 18.1330 0.1825 4.8343 0.3438 5.1781 1.3254 0.3289 1.6543 19,961.11 06 19,961.11
06 1.0178 3.1521 20,925.87
20 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1850 of 2287
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.7988 0.0000 7.7988 3.5332 0.0000 3.5332 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5043 10.2150 12.1450 0.0206 0.4850 0.4850 0.4850 0.4850 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 0.5043 10.2150 12.1450 0.0206 7.7988 0.4850 8.2838 3.5332 0.4850 4.0182 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.8183 55.1082 17.7389 0.1815 4.7225 0.3430 5.0656 1.2958 0.3282 1.6240 19,857.09 79 19,857.09
79 1.0150 3.1496 20,821.04
32 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0346 0.0253 0.3941 1.0200e0030.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 104.0127 104.0127 2.8200e0032.5000e003104.8288 Total 1.8530 55.1335 18.1330 0.1825 4.8343 0.3438 5.1781 1.3254 0.3289 1.6543 19,961.11 06 19,961.11
06 1.0178 3.1521 20,925.87
20 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1851 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1259 3.1350 1.0749 0.0125 0.4099 0.0299 0.4398 0.1180 0.0286 0.1466 1,346.954 2 1,346.954
2 0.0450 0.1941 1,405.920
9 Worker 1.0245 0.7479 11.6663 0.0303 3.3086 0.0212 3.3298 0.8775 0.0195 0.8970 3,078.776 1 3,078.776
1 0.0833 0.0741 3,102.931
9 Total 1.1504 3.8829 12.7412 0.0428 3.7185 0.0511 3.7696 0.9955 0.0481 1.0436 4,425.730 3 4,425.730
3 0.1284 0.2682 4,508.852
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1852 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1259 3.1350 1.0749 0.0125 0.4099 0.0299 0.4398 0.1180 0.0286 0.1466 1,346.954 2 1,346.954
2 0.0450 0.1941 1,405.920
9 Worker 1.0245 0.7479 11.6663 0.0303 3.3086 0.0212 3.3298 0.8775 0.0195 0.8970 3,078.776 1 3,078.776
1 0.0833 0.0741 3,102.931
9 Total 1.1504 3.8829 12.7412 0.0428 3.7185 0.0511 3.7696 0.9955 0.0481 1.0436 4,425.730 3 4,425.730
3 0.1284 0.2682 4,508.852
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1853 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0737 2.4565 0.9517 0.0119 0.4100 0.0124 0.4223 0.1180 0.0118 0.1299 1,281.807 8 1,281.807
8 0.0430 0.1843 1,337.799
1 Worker 0.9479 0.6608 10.7262 0.0293 3.3086 0.0200 3.3286 0.8775 0.0184 0.8958 2,997.333 8 2,997.333
8 0.0746 0.0683 3,019.557
7 Total 1.0215 3.1174 11.6779 0.0412 3.7185 0.0323 3.7509 0.9955 0.0302 1.0257 4,279.141 7 4,279.141
7 0.1176 0.2526 4,357.356
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1854 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0737 2.4565 0.9517 0.0119 0.4100 0.0124 0.4223 0.1180 0.0118 0.1299 1,281.807 8 1,281.807
8 0.0430 0.1843 1,337.799
1 Worker 0.9479 0.6608 10.7262 0.0293 3.3086 0.0200 3.3286 0.8775 0.0184 0.8958 2,997.333 8 2,997.333
8 0.0746 0.0683 3,019.557
7 Total 1.0215 3.1174 11.6779 0.0412 3.7185 0.0323 3.7509 0.9955 0.0302 1.0257 4,279.141 7 4,279.141
7 0.1176 0.2526 4,357.356
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1855 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0714 2.4615 0.9314 0.0117 0.4100 0.0124 0.4224 0.1180 0.0119 0.1299 1,262.557 5 1,262.557
5 0.0431 0.1817 1,317.785
6 Worker 0.8835 0.5901 9.9841 0.0285 3.3086 0.0192 3.3277 0.8775 0.0176 0.8951 2,935.547 4 2,935.547
4 0.0675 0.0635 2,956.167
8 Total 0.9549 3.0517 10.9155 0.0402 3.7185 0.0316 3.7501 0.9955 0.0295 1.0250 4,198.104 8 4,198.104
8 0.1107 0.2452 4,273.953
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1856 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0714 2.4615 0.9314 0.0117 0.4100 0.0124 0.4224 0.1180 0.0119 0.1299 1,262.557 5 1,262.557
5 0.0431 0.1817 1,317.785
6 Worker 0.8835 0.5901 9.9841 0.0285 3.3086 0.0192 3.3277 0.8775 0.0176 0.8951 2,935.547 4 2,935.547
4 0.0675 0.0635 2,956.167
8 Total 0.9549 3.0517 10.9155 0.0402 3.7185 0.0316 3.7501 0.9955 0.0295 1.0250 4,198.104 8 4,198.104
8 0.1107 0.2452 4,273.953
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1857 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0694 2.4499 0.9143 0.0115 0.4100 0.0125 0.4224 0.1180 0.0119 0.1300 1,239.826 5 1,239.826
5 0.0434 0.1786 1,294.125
1 Worker 0.8263 0.5303 9.3049 0.0275 3.3086 0.0183 3.3269 0.8775 0.0168 0.8943 2,863.718 8 2,863.718
8 0.0609 0.0593 2,882.923
9 Total 0.8957 2.9801 10.2192 0.0390 3.7185 0.0307 3.7493 0.9955 0.0287 1.0242 4,103.545 2 4,103.545
2 0.1043 0.2379 4,177.048
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1858 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0694 2.4499 0.9143 0.0115 0.4100 0.0125 0.4224 0.1180 0.0119 0.1300 1,239.826 5 1,239.826
5 0.0434 0.1786 1,294.125
1 Worker 0.8263 0.5303 9.3049 0.0275 3.3086 0.0183 3.3269 0.8775 0.0168 0.8943 2,863.718 8 2,863.718
8 0.0609 0.0593 2,882.923
9 Total 0.8957 2.9801 10.2192 0.0390 3.7185 0.0307 3.7493 0.9955 0.0287 1.0242 4,103.545 2 4,103.545
2 0.1043 0.2379 4,177.048
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1859 of 2287
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5732 5.3259 8.7951 0.0136 0.2465 0.2465 0.2276 0.2276 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.5732 5.3259 8.7951 0.0136 0.2465 0.2465 0.2276 0.2276 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0363 0.0233 0.4087 1.2100e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 125.7714 125.7714 2.6700e0032.6100e003126.6149 Total 0.0363 0.0233 0.4087 1.2100e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 125.7714 125.7714 2.6700e0032.6100e003126.6149 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1860 of 2287
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3195 6.6399 9.8512 0.0136 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.0000 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.3195 6.6399 9.8512 0.0136 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.0000 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0363 0.0233 0.4087 1.2100e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 125.7714 125.7714 2.6700e0032.6100e003126.6149 Total 0.0363 0.0233 0.4087 1.2100e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 125.7714 125.7714 2.6700e0032.6100e003126.6149 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1861 of 2287
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 85.9987 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 86.1696 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1647 0.1057 1.8547 5.4800e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 570.8088 570.8088 0.0121 0.0118 574.6369 Total 0.1647 0.1057 1.8547 5.4800e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 570.8088 570.8088 0.0121 0.0118 574.6369 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1862 of 2287
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 85.9987 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 86.0581 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1647 0.1057 1.8547 5.4800e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 570.8088 570.8088 0.0121 0.0118 574.6369 Total 0.1647 0.1057 1.8547 5.4800e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 570.8088 570.8088 0.0121 0.0118 574.6369 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1863 of 2287
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.7198 3.7012 37.6797 0.0847 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4900 8,852.874 7 8,852.874
7 0.5612 0.3444 8,969.527
4 Unmitigated 3.7198 3.7012 37.6797 0.0847 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4900 8,852.874 7 8,852.874
7 0.5612 0.3444 8,969.527
4 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 1,246.56 1,270.08 1005.48 4,153,480 4,153,480 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,246.56 1,270.08 1,005.48 4,153,480 4,153,480
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments High Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1864 of 2287
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments High Rise 0.540171 0.064547 0.189075 0.126673 0.023412 0.006384 0.010926 0.008089 0.000929 0.000597 0.025155 0.000706 0.003335 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.540171 0.064547 0.189075 0.126673 0.023412 0.006384 0.010926 0.008089 0.000929 0.000597 0.025155 0.000706 0.003335
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1865 of 2287
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise
8664.87 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise
8.66487 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1866 of 2287
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Unmitigated 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1867 of 2287
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
8.3304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.4851 4.1454 1.7640 0.0265 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.0000 5,292.000 0 5,292.000
0 0.1014 0.0970 5,323.447
7 Landscaping 0.7323 0.2796 24.2835 1.2800e0030.1346 0.1346 0.1346 0.1346 43.7842 43.7842 0.0421 44.8370 Total 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1868 of 2287
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
8.3304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.4851 4.1454 1.7640 0.0265 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.0000 5,292.000 0 5,292.000
0 0.1014 0.0970 5,323.447
7 Landscaping 0.7323 0.2796 24.2835 1.2800e0030.1346 0.1346 0.1346 0.1346 43.7842 43.7842 0.0421 44.8370 Total 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1869 of 2287
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:32 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1870 of 2287
Lucia Park - Project
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Land Use - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Trips and VMT - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Demolition - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Grading - Total arces graded less than SCEA's model.
Architectural Coating - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors and Areas" Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the SCEA's model.
Woodstoves - Consistent with the SCEA's model.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 502.00 Space 0.00 200,800.00 0 Apartments High Rise 294.00 Dwelling Unit 1.23 417,135.00 841
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Glendale Water and Power
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
948.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1871 of 2287
Water Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Energy Mitigation - Consistent with SCEA's model.
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 7.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1872 of 2287
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 62.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 12.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 619.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 31.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 31.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.70 0.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 76,000.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 294,000.00 417,135.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.52 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.74 1.23
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 6.80
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.53 4.32
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 3.59 3.42
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.45 4.24
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.70 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1873 of 2287
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.3073 74.4897 27.8862 0.2032 12.6331 1.0881 13.7212 4.8586 1.0137 5.8723 0.0000 21,966.92 56 21,966.92
56 1.6585 3.1548 22,948.52
55 2023 2.6128 15.0123 23.4518 0.0617 3.7185 0.5469 4.2654 0.9955 0.5271 1.5226 0.0000 6,125.068 7 6,125.068
7 0.4584 0.2578 6,213.336
7 2024 2.4411 14.2928 22.6633 0.0608 3.7185 0.4822 4.2008 0.9955 0.4644 1.4599 0.0000 6,047.691 2 6,047.691
2 0.4449 0.2500 6,133.320
3 2025 86.3477 13.5634 21.9498 0.0596 3.7185 0.4233 4.1418 0.9955 0.4073 1.4028 0.0000 5,957.468 0 5,957.468
0 0.4320 0.2424 6,040.495
4 Maximum 86.3477 74.4897 27.8862 0.2032 12.6331 1.0881 13.7212 4.8586 1.0137 5.8723 0.0000 21,966.92 56 21,966.92
56 1.6585 3.1548 22,948.52
55 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1874 of 2287
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.2712 67.7212 30.8110 0.2032 12.6331 0.8308 13.4640 4.8586 0.8158 5.6744 0.0000 21,966.92 56 21,966.92
56 1.6585 3.1548 22,948.52
55 2023 1.7303 15.3786 24.3194 0.0617 3.7185 0.7639 4.4824 0.9955 0.7618 1.7573 0.0000 6,125.068 7 6,125.068
7 0.4584 0.2578 6,213.336
7 2024 1.6619 15.3056 23.6247 0.0608 3.7185 0.7632 4.4817 0.9955 0.7611 1.7566 0.0000 6,047.691 2 6,047.691
2 0.4449 0.2500 6,133.320
3 2025 86.2363 15.2273 22.9890 0.0596 3.7185 0.7623 4.4809 0.9955 0.7603 1.7558 0.0000 5,957.468 0 5,957.468
0 0.4320 0.2424 6,040.495
4 Maximum 86.2363 67.7212 30.8110 0.2032 12.6331 0.8308 13.4640 4.8586 0.8158 5.6744 0.0000 21,966.92 56 21,966.92
56 1.6585 3.1548 22,948.52
55 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
2.97 3.17 -6.04 0.00 0.00 -22.82 -2.20 0.00 -28.46 -6.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1875 of 2287
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Energy 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Mobile 3.6541 3.9947 36.9090 0.0811 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4901 8,478.790 1 8,478.790
1 0.5763 0.3592 8,600.248
4 Total 14.0257 9.2182 63.2963 0.1139 9.1381 0.5945 9.7326 2.4342 0.5902 3.0244 0.0000 14,833.97 11 14,833.97
11 0.7394 0.4749 14,993.98
76 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Energy 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Mobile 3.6541 3.9947 36.9090 0.0811 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4901 8,478.790 1 8,478.790
1 0.5763 0.3592 8,600.248
4 Total 14.0257 9.2182 63.2963 0.1139 9.1381 0.5945 9.7326 2.4342 0.5902 3.0244 0.0000 14,833.97 11 14,833.97
11 0.7394 0.4749 14,993.98
76 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1876 of 2287
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 8/1/2022 10/25/2022 5 62
2 Grading Grading 10/26/2022 11/10/2022 5 12
3 Building Construction Building Construction 11/11/2022 3/26/2025 5 619 4 Paving Paving 3/27/2025 5/8/2025 5 31
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/9/2025 6/20/2025 5 31 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 844,698; Residential Outdoor: 281,566; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area:
12,048 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 12
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1877 of 2287
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 150.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 9,500.00 14.70 6.90 6.80 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 296.00 64.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 59.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1878 of 2287
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5219 0.0000 0.5219 0.0790 0.0000 0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.5219 0.8379 1.3598 0.0790 0.7829 0.8619 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0110 0.4228 0.0964 1.5000e0030.0424 3.0300e0030.0454 0.0116 2.8900e0030.0145 164.7521 164.7521 8.7300e0030.0261 172.7604 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0482 0.0363 0.4704 1.2600e0030.1453 9.3000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 128.0673 128.0673 3.7000e0033.4800e003129.1958 Total 0.0592 0.4591 0.5668 2.7600e0030.1877 3.9600e0030.1916 0.0502 3.7500e0030.0539 292.8194 292.8194 0.0124 0.0296 301.9561 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1879 of 2287
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5219 0.0000 0.5219 0.0790 0.0000 0.0790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5621 12.1033 15.4154 0.0241 0.7182 0.7182 0.7182 0.7182 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Total 0.5621 12.1033 15.4154 0.0241 0.5219 0.7182 1.2401 0.0790 0.7182 0.7972 0.0000 2,323.416 8 2,323.416
8 0.5921 2,338.219
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0110 0.4228 0.0964 1.5000e0030.0424 3.0300e0030.0454 0.0116 2.8900e0030.0145 164.7521 164.7521 8.7300e0030.0261 172.7604 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0482 0.0363 0.4704 1.2600e0030.1453 9.3000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.6000e0040.0394 128.0673 128.0673 3.7000e0033.4800e003129.1958 Total 0.0592 0.4591 0.5668 2.7600e0030.1877 3.9600e0030.1916 0.0502 3.7500e0030.0539 292.8194 292.8194 0.0124 0.0296 301.9561 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1880 of 2287
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.7988 0.0000 7.7988 3.5332 0.0000 3.5332 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.7988 0.7423 8.5411 3.5332 0.6829 4.2161 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.7299 57.4782 18.3042 0.1817 4.7225 0.3451 5.0676 1.2958 0.3302 1.6259 19,872.92 98 19,872.92
98 1.0102 3.1522 20,837.52
73 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0371 0.0279 0.3619 9.7000e0040.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 98.5133 98.5133 2.8500e0032.6700e00399.3813 Total 1.7669 57.5061 18.6660 0.1826 4.8343 0.3458 5.1801 1.3254 0.3308 1.6562 19,971.44 31 19,971.44
31 1.0131 3.1548 20,936.90
86 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1881 of 2287
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.7988 0.0000 7.7988 3.5332 0.0000 3.5332 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.5043 10.2150 12.1450 0.0206 0.4850 0.4850 0.4850 0.4850 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 0.5043 10.2150 12.1450 0.0206 7.7988 0.4850 8.2838 3.5332 0.4850 4.0182 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 1.7299 57.4782 18.3042 0.1817 4.7225 0.3451 5.0676 1.2958 0.3302 1.6259 19,872.92 98 19,872.92
98 1.0102 3.1522 20,837.52
73 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0371 0.0279 0.3619 9.7000e0040.1118 7.2000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.6000e0040.0303 98.5133 98.5133 2.8500e0032.6700e00399.3813 Total 1.7669 57.5061 18.6660 0.1826 4.8343 0.3458 5.1801 1.3254 0.3308 1.6562 19,971.44 31 19,971.44
31 1.0131 3.1548 20,936.90
86 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1882 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1244 3.2642 1.1120 0.0125 0.4099 0.0300 0.4399 0.1180 0.0287 0.1467 1,347.460 3 1,347.460
3 0.0449 0.1944 1,406.497
9 Worker 1.0967 0.8264 10.7114 0.0287 3.3086 0.0212 3.3298 0.8775 0.0195 0.8970 2,915.994 1 2,915.994
1 0.0843 0.0791 2,941.687
8 Total 1.2212 4.0907 11.8235 0.0412 3.7185 0.0512 3.7697 0.9955 0.0482 1.0437 4,263.454 4 4,263.454
4 0.1292 0.2735 4,348.185
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1883 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.542 9 2,001.542
9 0.3486 2,010.258
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1244 3.2642 1.1120 0.0125 0.4099 0.0300 0.4399 0.1180 0.0287 0.1467 1,347.460 3 1,347.460
3 0.0449 0.1944 1,406.497
9 Worker 1.0967 0.8264 10.7114 0.0287 3.3086 0.0212 3.3298 0.8775 0.0195 0.8970 2,915.994 1 2,915.994
1 0.0843 0.0791 2,941.687
8 Total 1.2212 4.0907 11.8235 0.0412 3.7185 0.0512 3.7697 0.9955 0.0482 1.0437 4,263.454 4 4,263.454
4 0.1292 0.2735 4,348.185
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1884 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0712 2.5720 0.9816 0.0119 0.4100 0.0124 0.4224 0.1180 0.0119 0.1299 1,283.969 9 1,283.969
9 0.0428 0.1848 1,340.103
1 Worker 1.0184 0.7300 9.8592 0.0277 3.3086 0.0200 3.3286 0.8775 0.0184 0.8958 2,839.311 1 2,839.311
1 0.0757 0.0730 2,862.947
9 Total 1.0896 3.3019 10.8408 0.0397 3.7185 0.0324 3.7509 0.9955 0.0303 1.0258 4,123.281 0 4,123.281
0 0.1184 0.2578 4,203.051
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1885 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.787 7 2,001.787
7 0.3399 2,010.285
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0712 2.5720 0.9816 0.0119 0.4100 0.0124 0.4224 0.1180 0.0119 0.1299 1,283.969 9 1,283.969
9 0.0428 0.1848 1,340.103
1 Worker 1.0184 0.7300 9.8592 0.0277 3.3086 0.0200 3.3286 0.8775 0.0184 0.8958 2,839.311 1 2,839.311
1 0.0757 0.0730 2,862.947
9 Total 1.0896 3.3019 10.8408 0.0397 3.7185 0.0324 3.7509 0.9955 0.0303 1.0258 4,123.281 0 4,123.281
0 0.1184 0.2578 4,203.051
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1886 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0688 2.5772 0.9610 0.0117 0.4100 0.0125 0.4225 0.1180 0.0120 0.1300 1,264.731 7 1,264.731
7 0.0429 0.1822 1,320.097
5 Worker 0.9524 0.6517 9.1851 0.0270 3.3086 0.0192 3.3277 0.8775 0.0176 0.8951 2,781.038 0 2,781.038
0 0.0685 0.0678 2,802.966
5 Total 1.0211 3.2289 10.1461 0.0387 3.7185 0.0317 3.7502 0.9955 0.0296 1.0251 4,045.769 8 4,045.769
8 0.1115 0.2500 4,123.064
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1887 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0688 2.5772 0.9610 0.0117 0.4100 0.0125 0.4225 0.1180 0.0120 0.1300 1,264.731 7 1,264.731
7 0.0429 0.1822 1,320.097
5 Worker 0.9524 0.6517 9.1851 0.0270 3.3086 0.0192 3.3277 0.8775 0.0176 0.8951 2,781.038 0 2,781.038
0 0.0685 0.0678 2,802.966
5 Total 1.0211 3.2289 10.1461 0.0387 3.7185 0.0317 3.7502 0.9955 0.0296 1.0251 4,045.769 8 4,045.769
8 0.1115 0.2500 4,123.064
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1888 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0667 2.5652 0.9436 0.0115 0.4100 0.0125 0.4225 0.1180 0.0120 0.1300 1,241.999 9 1,241.999
9 0.0432 0.1790 1,296.432
3 Worker 0.8937 0.5854 8.5669 0.0260 3.3086 0.0183 3.3269 0.8775 0.0168 0.8943 2,713.315 6 2,713.315
6 0.0619 0.0633 2,733.738
3 Total 0.9604 3.1506 9.5104 0.0376 3.7185 0.0308 3.7494 0.9955 0.0288 1.0243 3,955.315 5 3,955.315
5 0.1051 0.2424 4,030.170
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1889 of 2287
3.4 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 0.6407 12.0767 13.4786 0.0221 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.7315 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0667 2.5652 0.9436 0.0115 0.4100 0.0125 0.4225 0.1180 0.0120 0.1300 1,241.999 9 1,241.999
9 0.0432 0.1790 1,296.432
3 Worker 0.8937 0.5854 8.5669 0.0260 3.3086 0.0183 3.3269 0.8775 0.0168 0.8943 2,713.315 6 2,713.315
6 0.0619 0.0633 2,733.738
3 Total 0.9604 3.1506 9.5104 0.0376 3.7185 0.0308 3.7494 0.9955 0.0288 1.0243 3,955.315 5 3,955.315
5 0.1051 0.2424 4,030.170
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1890 of 2287
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5732 5.3259 8.7951 0.0136 0.2465 0.2465 0.2276 0.2276 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.5732 5.3259 8.7951 0.0136 0.2465 0.2465 0.2276 0.2276 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0393 0.0257 0.3763 1.1400e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 119.1659 119.1659 2.7200e0032.7800e003120.0628 Total 0.0393 0.0257 0.3763 1.1400e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 119.1659 119.1659 2.7200e0032.7800e003120.0628 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1891 of 2287
3.5 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3195 6.6399 9.8512 0.0136 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.0000 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.3195 6.6399 9.8512 0.0136 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.3864 0.0000 1,297.809 6 1,297.809
6 0.4114 1,308.095
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0393 0.0257 0.3763 1.1400e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 119.1659 119.1659 2.7200e0032.7800e003120.0628 Total 0.0393 0.0257 0.3763 1.1400e0030.1453 8.0000e0040.1461 0.0385 7.4000e0040.0393 119.1659 119.1659 2.7200e0032.7800e003120.0628 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1892 of 2287
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 85.9987 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 86.1696 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1781 0.1167 1.7076 5.1900e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 540.8298 540.8298 0.0123 0.0126 544.9006 Total 0.1781 0.1167 1.7076 5.1900e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 540.8298 540.8298 0.0123 0.0126 544.9006 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1893 of 2287
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 85.9987 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 86.0581 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1781 0.1167 1.7076 5.1900e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 540.8298 540.8298 0.0123 0.0126 544.9006 Total 0.1781 0.1167 1.7076 5.1900e0030.6595 3.6400e0030.6631 0.1749 3.3500e0030.1783 540.8298 540.8298 0.0123 0.0126 544.9006 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1894 of 2287
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.6541 3.9947 36.9090 0.0811 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4901 8,478.790 1 8,478.790
1 0.5763 0.3592 8,600.248
4 Unmitigated 3.6541 3.9947 36.9090 0.0811 9.1381 0.0601 9.1982 2.4342 0.0558 2.4901 8,478.790 1 8,478.790
1 0.5763 0.3592 8,600.248
4 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise 1,246.56 1,270.08 1005.48 4,153,480 4,153,480 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,246.56 1,270.08 1,005.48 4,153,480 4,153,480
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments High Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1895 of 2287
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments High Rise 0.540171 0.064547 0.189075 0.126673 0.023412 0.006384 0.010926 0.008089 0.000929 0.000597 0.025155 0.000706 0.003335 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.540171 0.064547 0.189075 0.126673 0.023412 0.006384 0.010926 0.008089 0.000929 0.000597 0.025155 0.000706 0.003335
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1896 of 2287
6.0 Area Detail
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise
8664.87 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise
8.66487 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0934 0.7985 0.3398 5.1000e0030.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 1,019.396 8 1,019.396
8 0.0195 0.0187 1,025.454
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1897 of 2287
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Unmitigated 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1898 of 2287
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
8.3304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.4851 4.1454 1.7640 0.0265 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.0000 5,292.000 0 5,292.000
0 0.1014 0.0970 5,323.447
7 Landscaping 0.7323 0.2796 24.2835 1.2800e0030.1346 0.1346 0.1346 0.1346 43.7842 43.7842 0.0421 44.8370 Total 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1899 of 2287
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products
8.3304 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.4851 4.1454 1.7640 0.0265 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.3352 0.0000 5,292.000 0 5,292.000
0 0.1014 0.0970 5,323.447
7 Landscaping 0.7323 0.2796 24.2835 1.2800e0030.1346 0.1346 0.1346 0.1346 43.7842 43.7842 0.0421 44.8370 Total 10.2782 4.4250 26.0475 0.0277 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.4698 0.0000 5,335.784 2 5,335.784
2 0.1435 0.0970 5,368.284
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1900 of 2287
11.0 Vegetation
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 31 Date: 2/10/2022 4:34 PM Lucia Park - Project - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1901 of 2287
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0375 Total DPM (lbs) 528.0558904 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0433 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.205479452 Total DPM (g) 239526.1519 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.237260274 Construction Duration (days) 153 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.002642796 Total DPM (lbs) 86.6 Total DPM (lbs) 31.43835616 Release Height (meters) 3 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.001245616 Total DPM (g) 14260.43836 Total Acreage 1.46 Release Height (meters) 3 Start Date 8/1/2022 Max Horizontal (meters) 108.71 Total Acreage 1.46 End Date 1/1/2023 Min Horizontal (meters) 54.35 Max Horizontal (meters) 108.71 Construction Days 153 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Min Horizontal (meters) 54.35 Setting Urban Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0993 Population 196,543 Setting Urban Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.544109589 Start Date 8/1/2022 Population 196,543 Construction Duration (days) 365 End Date 45,823
Total DPM (lbs) 198.6 Total Construction Days 1049
Total DPM (g) 90084.96 Total Years of Construction 2.87 Start Date 1/1/2023 Total Years of Operation 27.13
End Date 1/1/2024
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1257
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.688767123
Construction Duration (days) 366
Total DPM (lbs) 252.0887671
Total DPM (g) 114347.4648
Start Date 1/1/2024
End Date 1/1/2025
Construction Days 366
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0508
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.278356164
Construction Duration (days) 165
Total DPM (lbs) 45.92876712
Total DPM (g) 20833.28877
Start Date 1/1/2025
End Date 6/15/2025
Construction Days 165
2025
Construction Operation
2022 Total Emission Rate
2023
2024
Attachment C
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1902 of 2287
Start date and time 02/04/22 11:04:32
AERSCREEN 21112
Lucia Park ‐ Project Construction
Lucia Park ‐ Project Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate: 0.264E‐02 g/s 0.210E‐01 lb/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 108.71 meters 356.66 feet
Area Source Width: 54.35 meters 178.31 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 196543
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
Attachment D
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1903 of 2287
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K ‐9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1904 of 2287
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1905 of 2287
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture
Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl
Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe
FLOWSECTOR started 02/04/22 11:07:27
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1906 of 2287
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1907 of 2287
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1908 of 2287
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1909 of 2287
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1910 of 2287
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1911 of 2287
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1912 of 2287
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1913 of 2287
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1914 of 2287
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1915 of 2287
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 02/04/22 11:07:35
REFINE started 02/04/22 11:07:35
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1916 of 2287
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 02/04/22 11:07:36
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 02/04/22 11:07:38
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1917 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM] Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT
0.80345E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.94151E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10512E+02 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
* 0.10681E+02 55.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.70940E+01 75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.45589E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33098E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25545E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20567E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17068E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14501E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12521E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10982E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.97392E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.87205E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.78750E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.71638E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.65528E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.60282E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.55734E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.51759E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.48243E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.45123E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.42335E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.39823E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.37560E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1918 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.35516E+00 625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33656E+00 650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.31961E+00 675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30409E+00 700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28984E+00 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27672E+00 750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26460E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25338E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24298E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23330E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22428E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21582E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20788E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20044E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.19341E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18679E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18134E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17543E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16985E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16458E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15958E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15483E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15033E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14605E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14197E+00 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13809E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13439E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1919 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13085E+00 1300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12748E+00 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12425E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12116E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11820E+00 1400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11537E+00 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11265E+00 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11004E+00 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10753E+00 1500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10512E+00 1525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10280E+00 1550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10057E+00 1575.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.98425E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.96355E-01 1625.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.94360E-01 1650.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.92434E-01 1675.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.90576E-01 1700.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.88782E-01 1725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.87048E-01 1750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.85372E-01 1775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.83751E-01 1800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.82183E-01 1824.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.80665E-01 1850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.79195E-01 1875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.77770E-01 1900.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.76390E-01 1924.99 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.75051E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1920 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.73752E-01 1975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.72492E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.71269E-01 2025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.70080E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.68927E-01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.67805E-01 2100.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.66715E-01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.65654E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.64623E-01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.63619E-01 2200.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.62642E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.61690E-01 2250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.60764E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.59861E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.58981E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.58124E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.57287E-01 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.56472E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.55676E-01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.54900E-01 2449.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.54142E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.53402E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.52679E-01 2525.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.51973E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.51283E-01 2575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.50609E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.49951E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1921 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.49307E-01 2650.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.48677E-01 2675.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.48061E-01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.47458E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.46868E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.46291E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.45726E-01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.45173E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.44632E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.44101E-01 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.43582E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.43073E-01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.42574E-01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.42085E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.41605E-01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.41136E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.40675E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.40223E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.39779E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.39345E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.38918E-01 3150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.38499E-01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.38088E-01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.37684E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.37288E-01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.36899E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.36517E-01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1922 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.36142E-01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.35773E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.35411E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.35055E-01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.34706E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.34362E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.34024E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33692E-01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33365E-01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33044E-01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.32729E-01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.32418E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.32112E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.31812E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.31516E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.31225E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30939E-01 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30657E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30379E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30106E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29837E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29572E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29312E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29055E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28802E-01 3925.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28553E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28307E-01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1923 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28066E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27827E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27593E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27361E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27133E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26909E-01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26687E-01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26469E-01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26253E-01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26041E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25832E-01 4250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25625E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25422E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25221E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25023E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24827E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24635E-01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24444E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24257E-01 4450.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24072E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23889E-01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23708E-01 4525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23530E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23355E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23181E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23010E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22841E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1924 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Construction_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:19 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22674E-01 4675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22509E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22347E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22186E-01 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22027E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21870E-01 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21715E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21562E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21411E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21262E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21115E-01 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20969E-01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20825E-01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20683E-01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1925 of 2287
Start date and time 02/04/22 11:13:58
AERSCREEN 21112
Lucia Park ‐ Project Operations
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA ** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate: 0.125E‐02 g/s 0.989E‐02 lb/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 108.71 meters 356.66 feet
Area Source Width: 54.35 meters 178.31 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 196543
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
No Building Downwash Parameters
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1926 of 2287
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet
Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K ‐9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1927 of 2287
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1928 of 2287
Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl
Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl
Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe
FLOWSECTOR started 02/04/22 11:14:56
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1929 of 2287
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1930 of 2287
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1931 of 2287
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1932 of 2287
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1933 of 2287
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1934 of 2287
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1935 of 2287
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1936 of 2287
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1937 of 2287
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1938 of 2287
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 02/04/22 11:15:03
REFINE started 02/04/22 11:15:03
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1939 of 2287
REFINE ended 02/04/22 11:15:04
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 02/04/22 11:15:06
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1940 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM] Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT
0.37864E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.44371E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.49541E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
* 0.50336E+01 55.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33432E+01 75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21485E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15598E+01 125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12039E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.96927E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.80439E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.68338E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.59010E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.51756E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.45898E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.41097E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.37113E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33761E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30882E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28409E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26266E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24393E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22736E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21265E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.19951E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18767E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17701E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1941 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16738E+00 625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15861E+00 650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15062E+00 675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14331E+00 700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13659E+00 725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13041E+00 750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12470E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11941E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11451E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10995E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10570E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10171E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.97970E-01 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.94460E-01 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.91146E-01 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.88029E-01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.85459E-01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.82677E-01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.80048E-01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.77560E-01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.75203E-01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.72968E-01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.70845E-01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.68828E-01 1200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.66907E-01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.65078E-01 1250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.63333E-01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1942 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.61668E-01 1300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.60077E-01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.58556E-01 1350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.57100E-01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.55706E-01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.54370E-01 1425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.53089E-01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.51858E-01 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.50677E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.49541E-01 1525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.48449E-01 1550.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.47398E-01 1575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.46385E-01 1600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.45410E-01 1625.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.44469E-01 1650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.43562E-01 1675.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.42686E-01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.41840E-01 1725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.41023E-01 1750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.40233E-01 1775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.39469E-01 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.38730E-01 1825.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.38015E-01 1850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.37322E-01 1875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.36651E-01 1900.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.36000E-01 1924.99 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.35369E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1943 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.34757E-01 1975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.34163E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33587E-01 2025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.33027E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.32483E-01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.31955E-01 2100.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.31441E-01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30941E-01 2150.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.30455E-01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29982E-01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29521E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.29073E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28636E-01 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.28211E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27796E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.27392E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26998E-01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26614E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.26239E-01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25873E-01 2449.99 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25515E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.25167E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24826E-01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24493E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.24168E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23851E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23540E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1944 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.23237E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22940E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22650E-01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22366E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.22088E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21816E-01 2775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21550E-01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21289E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.21034E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20784E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20539E-01 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20299E-01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.20064E-01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.19833E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.19607E-01 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.19386E-01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.19169E-01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18956E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18747E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18542E-01 3125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18341E-01 3150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.18143E-01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17950E-01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17760E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17573E-01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17390E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17210E-01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1945 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.17033E-01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16859E-01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16688E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16521E-01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16356E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16194E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.16035E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15878E-01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15724E-01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15573E-01 3550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15424E-01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15278E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.15134E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14992E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14853E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14715E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14581E-01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14448E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14317E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14188E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.14061E-01 3825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13937E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13814E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13693E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13574E-01 3925.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13456E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13341E-01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1946 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13226E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13114E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.13004E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12895E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12787E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12681E-01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12577E-01 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12474E-01 4175.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12373E-01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12272E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12174E-01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.12076E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11981E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11886E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11793E-01 4350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11700E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11610E-01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11520E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11432E-01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11344E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11258E-01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11173E-01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11089E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.11006E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10925E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10844E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10764E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1947 of 2287
file:///C/Users/swinn/Downloads/2022.02.04_LuciaPark_AERSCREEN_Operations_max_conc_distance.txt[2/11/2022 1:50:31 PM]
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10686E-01 4675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10608E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10531E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10456E-01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10381E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10307E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10234E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10162E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10091E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.10020E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.99507E-02 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.98820E-02 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.98142E-02 4975.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0.97471E-02 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0
1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1948 of 2287
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigationand RemediationStrategies
LitigationSupport and Testifying Expert
IndustrialStormwaterCompliance
CEQAReview
Education:
M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.
B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.
ProfessionalCertifications:
California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
ProfessionalExperience:
Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.
Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment E
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1949 of 2287
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).
Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:
With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vaporintrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications forlarge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1950 of 2287
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.
Executive Director:
As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.
Hydrogeology:
As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.
At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.
As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1951 of 2287
4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.
Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.
EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.
With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.
Policy:
Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.
Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1952 of 2287
5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peerreview of scientific documents.
Geology:
With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.
As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.
Teaching:
From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.
Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.
Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.
Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.
EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.
Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1953 of 2287
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.
Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.
Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.
Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1954 of 2287
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.
Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.
Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.
Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.
Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.
Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.
Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.
Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.
Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1955 of 2287
8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.
Other Experience:
Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1956 of 2287
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.
M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.
B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.
Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.
Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.
Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.
Attachment F
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1957 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021
Professional History:
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:
Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.
Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.
Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.
Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1958 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.
Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.
Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.
Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.
Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.
Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.
Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1959 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.
Presentations:
Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.
Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.
Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.
Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1960 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.
International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.
Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.
Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1961 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.
Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.
Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.
Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.
Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.
Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1962 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.
Teaching Experience:
UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.
National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.
National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.
California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.
UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.
University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.
U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.
Academic Grants Awarded:
California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.
Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.
Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.
Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.
King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1963 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.
Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.
Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.
Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.
Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.
Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.
Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1964 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1965 of 2287
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.
Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.
Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.
Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.
Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 1
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1966 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 1 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 COMMENT LETTER NO. 1:
Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) Brian B. Flynn
Attorney, Lozeau Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Ste. 150
Oakland, CA 94612
Response to Comment 1-1
The comment requests the SCEA be revised in response to the comments presented in this letter. This comment incorrectly claims the SCEA does not incorporate all feasible mitigation measures from prior environmental impact reports (EIRs); in addition, it includes comments on the air quality analysis in the SCEA. As further discussed in Response to Comment 1-4 through 1-9, the SCEA does not need to be revised as it incorporated all feasible mitigation measures from prior EIRs, which include (1) the SCAG 2020–2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR; (2) the City of Glendale South Glendale Community Plan EIR; and (3) the City of Glendale Downtown Specific Plan EIR). As discussed in the following responses, the Air Quality analysis in the SCEA is sufficient and adequately discloses all potential impacts.
Response to Comment 1-2
The comment includes a description of the proposed Project. As this comment does not address the information, analysis nor conclusions in the SCEA, no further response is necessary.
Response to Comment 1-3
This comment includes legal background for the preparation of a SCEA document pursuant to CEQA. As this comment does not address the information, analysis nor conclusions in the SCEA, no further response is necessary.
Response to Comment 1-4
This comment asserts that numerous feasible mitigation measures from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR were not applied to the proposed Project. Specifically, the comment claims mitigation measure PMM AQ-1 is identified in the SCEA as being incorporated into the Project, but the SCEA does not identify which of the individual measures in PMM AQ-1 are feasible and incorporated into the Project. This is incorrect.
Table 3.3-1 of the SCEA identifies the applicability of all mitigation measures from the prior EIRs, including PMM AQ-1. Table 3.3-1 states which mitigation measures from PMM AQ-1 would be incorporated into the Project and provides an explanation as to why mitigation measures “i,” “r,” “s,” “t,” “v,” “w,” “x,” “aa,” 1967 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 2 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 “cc vi,” “cc xi,” “cc xii,” “cc xiii,” “cc xv,” and “cc xvii” in PMM AQ-1 are not incorporated into the Project.1 The explanations of why these mitigation measures are not applicable to this project are provided in Table
3.3.-1 of the SCEA and below:
• Item “i” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because it is specifically applicable to Caltrans projects.
• Item “r” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because SCAQMD “SOON” funds would not be included as part of the proposed Project.
• Item “s” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because the Project site is not located within an AB 617 community.
• Item “t” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because it is specifically applicable to school projects.
• Item “v” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because it is specifically applicable to airport projects.
• Item “w” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because it is specifically applicable to port projects.
• Item “x” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because it is specifically applicable to rail projects.
• Item “aa” is not incorporated into the proposed Project as Glendale is not identified as a lowincome and/or minority community. • Item “cc vi” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse effects related to aesthetics or transportation (see Appendix E to of the SCEA) that would require replacement of traffic lights. • Item “cc ix” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because the Project site is not a landfill or wastewater treatment plant.
1 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Pages 3-19 through 3-26. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1968 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 3 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 • Item “cc xii” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse effects related to transportation (see Appendix E to the SCEA) that would require traffic calming measures.
• Item “cc xiii” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because non-motorized zones would not be included as part of the proposed Project. It is not applicable to individual private development projects.
• Item “cc xv” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because dedicated bike trails would not be included as part of the proposed Project.
• Item “cc xvii” is not incorporated into the proposed Project because the proposed Project would not provide residential streets and therefore permits would not be required. All 373 parking spaces would be provided within four subterranean levels for the residential use proposed on the site. The amount of parking supplied for the proposed Project would be consistent with the GMC. 2 This comment also asserts there are inconsistencies between mitigation measures listed in the SCEA, such as which tier will be required for construction equipment between PMM AQ-1 from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR and MM 4.2-2(h) from the City of Glendale Downtown Specific Plan EIR. PMM AQ-1 Item “q” states, “Require projects to use Tier 4 Final equipment or better for all engines above 50 horsepower (hp). In the event that construction equipment cannot meet to Tier 4 Final engine certification, the Project representative or contractor must demonstrate through future study with written findings supported by substantial evidence that is approved by SCAG before using other technologies/strategies.”3 Additionally, PMM AQ-1 Items “bb iii” and “bb iv” state “Nonroad diesel engines on site shall be Tier 2 or higher” and “Diesel nonroad construction equipment on site for more than 10 total days shall have either (1) engines meeting EPA Tier 4 nonroad emissions standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB for use with nonroad engines to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85% for engines for 50 hp and greater and by a minimum of 20% for engines less than 50 hp.”4 City of Glendale Downtown Specific Plan EIR MM 4.2-2(h) requires construction equipment to meet or exceed Tier 2 standards use emulsified diesel fuels, and equip construction equipment with oxidation catalysts, particulate traps, or other verified or certified retrofit technologies to the extent feasible. As 2 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Pages 3-20. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 3 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 3-20. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 4 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 3-23. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1969 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 4 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 CEQA requires all feasible mitigation measures be applied to a project preparing a SCEA, both 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR PMM AQ-1 and City of Glendale Downtown Specific Plan EIR MM 4.2-2(h) are applied to the proposed Project. In this case, as two measures from prior applicable EIRs address construction equipment, the City will require the most restrictive requirement to be met. It is important to note that the SCEA concluded the construction emissions would be below the significance thresholds without mitigation measures or compliance without mitigation.
Last, this comment incorrectly states that 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR PMM GHG-1 is not mentioned in the SCEA and the SCEA only relies on mitigation policies from the City of Glendale South Glendale Community Plan EIR. The applicability of 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR PMM GHG-1 is discussed in Table 3.3-2 of the SCEA. PMM GHG-1 reads “In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to greenhouse gas emissions, as applicable and feasible.”
As discussed in this table, PMM GHG-1 is not incorporated into the Project because, in accordance with the analysis in Section 5.8: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, “the GHG emissions generated by the project would not result in substantial adverse effects related to greenhouse gas emissions and the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for the purposes of reducing the emissions of GHGs.
The proposed Project would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality by concentrating residential uses within one-half mile of a high-quality transit corridor and within a transit priority area.
The proposed Project would provide new housing near public transit, which would encourage the use and productivity of the existing public transportation system. The Project would comply with the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), and would incorporate eco-friendly building materials, systems, and high-performance building envelope. In addition, the proposed Project would comply with the Greener Glendale Plan, which incorporates twelve (12) measures in addition to the mandatory Green Building Standards for new construction projects. As such, the Project’s location, land use characteristics, and design render it consistent with statewide and regional climate change mandates, plans, policies, and recommendations. The Project will not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases.”5 PMM GHG-1 is not incorporated into the Project because the Project would not result in substantial adverse GHG impacts as discussed in Table 3.3- 2 of the SCEA.
5 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Pages 3-53 through 3-54. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1970 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 5 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 Response to Comment 1-5
While not a CEQA issue, project inhabitants would be protected from potential internal air quality issues, as the proposed Project would be required to comply with CALGreen Section 4.504.5 and 5.504.4.5, which set formaldehyde emissions limits for composite wood products. Composite wood products manufactured in or imported to the U.S. are required to be certified and labeled as California Air Resources Board (CARB) Airborne Toxic Control Measures (ATCM) Phase II or Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Title VI compliant.
As further discussed in Response to Comment 1-6, the information of the effects formaldehyde on indoor air quality provided by Mr. Offermann does not support the need for further analysis of the potential effects of off-gassing of formaldehyde from building materials on indoor air quality. Moreover, as discussed in Responses to Comment 1-7 through 1-9, SWAPE’s claims that air quality analysis in the SCEA is insufficient is inaccurate and the supplemental analysis provided by SWAPE does not properly reflect the proposed Project.
Response to Comment 1-6
The comment letter includes a paper prepared by Indoor Environmental Engineering as Exhibit A which states that air quality analysis in the SCEA is not adequate as it does not discuss, disclose, analyze, and mitigate the significant health risks posed from formaldehyde, a toxic air contaminant. The comment asserts that residents of new residential buildings are exposed to high levels of off-gassed formaldehyde from composite wood products used to construct buildings. The comment also states that residents of the Project site would be exposed to adverse levels of PM2.5 from ambient concentrations of PM2.5 within the Project site.
The comment alleges that its expert, Mr. Offermann, has determined that indoor emissions of formaldehyde will result in a significant health risk that requires further analysis to determine appropriate mitigation. Mr. Offermann’s claims assume this Project will be built using typical materials and construction methods used in California, such that future residents will experience a cancer risk from formaldehyde of approximately 120 in one million. Mr. Offermann cites his own, thirteen years old, 2009 study—the California New Home Study (CNHS), and calculates a 180 in one million figure based on this outdated 2009 study. Moreover, Mr. Offermann cites the updated CNHS, conducted in 2016-2018 (Singer et. al., 2019), which found that the median indoor concentrations of formaldehyde in new homes built after 2009 with California Air Resources Board (CARB) Phase 2 Formaldehyde ATCM materials had lower indoor formaldehyde concentrations, with a median indoor concentration of 22.4 μg/m3 (18.2 ppb) as compared to a median of 36 μg/m3 found in the 2007 CNHS. However, while new homes built after the 2009 CARB formaldehyde ATCM have a 33% lower median indoor formaldehyde concentration and cancer 1971 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 6 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 risk, the median lifetime cancer risk is still 120 per million for homes built with CARB compliant composite wood products.
Mr. Offermann’s claim that the proposed Project would result in significant impacts is based on pure speculation and assumption regarding (1) project construction and materials; (2) how much ventilation the proposed apartment units would have; and (3) size and type of residential units included in the proposed Project. First, Mr. Offermann assumed the proposed Project would use formaldehyde containing materials during construction. Mr. Offermann’s conclusion is based on speculation as exact building materials have not been finalized for the proposed Project and are not required to be disclosed or analyzed under CEQA. Moreover, Mr. Offermann states that the proposed Project will be built with CARB Phase II Formaldehyde ATCM materials. Again, this is speculation as CARB has approved no-added formaldehyde (NAF) materials that would be available for use in construction of the proposed Project. It is unknown at this time whether the proposed Project will utilize NAF materials or what percentage of materials will contain formaldehyde. As such, analyzing formaldehyde concentrations associated with the proposed Project is not feasible at this time, but in any event any materials will be required to comply with LORS.
Second, Mr. Offermann referenced the roadway noise analysis for the SCEA and labeled the proposed Project a “sound impacted site” which would lead residents to keep their windows closed, thus lowering ventilation. As Mr. Offermann mentions, roadway noise would reach a maximum of 63.3 dBA. As detailed within the Noise Study for the SCEA, noise levels are considered “normally acceptable” up to 65 dBA for multi-family residences. As such, Mr. Offermann’s claim that the proposed Project would be a “sound impacted site” is incorrect. Third, Mr. Offermann’s calculations regarding the proposed Project assumed values for floor area, ceiling height, and number of bedrooms for a “New Single-Family Residence Scenario” as defined in the Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions for Indoor Sources Using Environmental Chambers, Version 1.1, 2017. These values do not reflect the size of the residential units included in the proposed Project and are an inaccurate reference as the proposed Project includes a multi-family development, not single-family residences. Specifically, Mr. Offermann’s assumed a 4-bedroom, single-family residence with a floor area of 2,272 square feet results in an inaccurate and gross overestimation of the amount of formaldehyde containing materials that could potentially be used in a single unit because the proposed Project would not include units over 1,500 square feet.
1972 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 7 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 Moreover, there are several variables that contribute to formaldehyde concentrations within residential dwellings including: 6
• the age of the building, since the release of formaldehyde decreases with time. • temperature and relative humidity.
• the air exchange rate.
• the season.
Mr. Offermann’s assumptions about indoor formaldehyde concentrations for the proposed residences do not consider several of these factors and therefore cannot be considered reliable. Mr. Offerman states wood products typically used in residential construction contain formaldehyde products which off-gas formaldehyde “over a very long time period,” but Mr. Offerman provides no reference to this statement and does not specify a time period. However, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry cites one study that shows that most formaldehyde is released from products within two years.7 Therefore,
Mr. Offerman’s assumption that the proposed Project’s residents would be exposed to high formaldehyde concentrations 24 hours per day, 52 weeks per year, with an average 70-year lifetime, is a gross overestimation and does not consider the fact that indoor formaldehyde levels decrease substantially after the first few years of construction. Moreover, Mr. Offermann does not include any information or analysis regarding temperature, humidity, seasonal conditions, or air exchange technology specific to the Project site, all of which he states are relevant to indoor formaldehyde concentrations. Mr. Offermann’s speculations and assumptions do not constitute substantial evidence that the Project would result in significant interior air quality impacts from formaldehyde.
Response to Comment 1-7
The letter includes a paper prepared by SWAPE as Exhibit B which claims the emission estimates calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model Version CalEEMod.2020.4.0 presented in the SCEA underestimated the emissions that will result from the project. Specifically, SWAPE incorrectly claims that several default values were changed without any substantiation for changing these default values. The first claim is that the exterior and interior architectural and area coating emission factors were incorrectly reduced from their default value of 100- to 50-grams per liter (g/L). As shown in the CalEEMod “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, this change is consistent with SCAQMDS Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) which identifies 50 g/L as the standard for building envelope coatings effective January 1, 2019, and is considered regulatory compliance. Moreover, as noted in the SCEA, and contrary to assertions, the construction emission results presented in Table 5.3-1 are not adjusted to include 6 World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants, 2010. Available at:
https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/128169/e94535.pdf. Accessed March 2022. 7 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Formaldehyde in Your Home: What you need to know. Available at:
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/formaldehyde/home/index.html#Park. Accessed March 2022. 1973 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 8 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 regulatory compliance measures that would lower emissions (e.g., construction equipment controls, control efficiency of PM10 (dust control measures per SCAQMD Rule 403), or reduced VOC emissions from architectural coatings (per SCAQMD Rule 1113). Therefore, the SCEA reflects a worst-case scenario analysis.
8 As shown in Table 5.3-1 in the SCEA, and in Appendix A, Attachments A.3 and A.4 (2.1 Overall Construction – Unmitigated Construction), construction emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds without any regulatory compliance or mitigation measures.9
SWAPE also claims the construction phase lengths were altered within the CalEEMod analysis without substantiation. This claim is also incorrect because the SCEA relied on construction phase lengths provided by the proposed Project’s contractor and the estimates are from the most reliable source for estimating the length of construction phases in order to provide inputs into the model. The commenter has not shown why relying on construction contractor construction phase time estimates is not warranted or reliable. Moreover, these phase lengths are disclosed in Appendix A to the SCEA in Table 11, provided below.10 Accordingly, the commenter’s criticisms that the time frames and description of the construction activities were not disclosed is inaccurate, are not warranted, and are based on speculation, which is not substantial evidence.
TABLE 11
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Construction
Activity
Approximate Start
Date
Approximate End
Datea,b
Duration
(Days) Description
Demolition 8/1/22 8/31/22 23 Removal of existing one-story office building and parking structure
Grading 9/1/22 12/15/22 76 Grading of site and export of 76,000 cubic yards of soil
Building
Construction 12/1/22 6/15/2025 662 Construction of 294-unit apartment building and parking structure Paving 9/1/24 12/2/24 66 Paving of asphalt surfaces
Architectural
Coatingc 1/1/24 6/15/25 380 Application of architectural coatings to building materials
Note: Refer to Attachment A.3 Proposed (Summer) and Attachment A.4 Proposed (Winter), Section 3.0: Construction Detail. a Construction of the proposed Project would occur over approximately 35 months. b The proposed Project would be subject to a Development Agreement that currently has a six (6) year term. While the construction could start as early as August 2022, it could start as late as July 2028 depending on when the entitlements are approved. The most conservative analysis of construction impacts would be to assume construction would begin August 2022 8 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-24. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 9 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-24. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 10 Meridian Consultants LLC. Air Quality & Greenhouse Gas Technical Study for the Lucia Park Project 625 N. Maryland Avenue and 620 N. Grand Boulevard Glendale, California 91203. December 2021. Appendix A. Page 29. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65591/637781192050470000. Accessed March 2022. 1974 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 9 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 TABLE 11
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Construction
Activity
Approximate Start
Date
Approximate End
Datea,b
Duration
(Days) Description
through June 2022 as emissions would be higher in earlier years. Thus, this study analyzes construction impacts between August 2022 through June 2025.
c Architectural coating will be taking place intermittently throughout building construction.
Lastly, SWAPE claims the analysis incorrectly utilized area and architectural coating mitigation for operational emissions. As discussed previously, this change is consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings) which identifies 50 g/L as the standard for building envelope coatings effective January 1, 2019. The Project is required to comply with this existing standard. Moreover, the operational emission results presented in Table 5.3-3 in the SCEA reflect a worse-case scenario, they do not include any reductions that would result from existing regulations, such as reduced VOC emissions from architectural coatings (per SCAQMD Rule 1113). As shown in Table 5.3-3 in the SCEA, and in Appendix A, Attachments A.3 and A.4 (2.2 Overall Operational – Unmitigated Operational), operational emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds without taking into account reductions that would result from compliance from existing regulations or mitigation measures.11 SWAPE’s claim that the construction and operational emission estimates provided in the SCEA are underestimated is unfounded.
Response to Comment 1-8
The comment erroneously claims that the SCEA did not quantitatively evaluate the proposed Project’s construction-related and operational Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) or connect these emissions to potential health risk impacts posed to nearby existing sensitive receptors. The City relies on methodology established by SCAQMD for preparation of CEQA air quality analyses. SCAQMD shares responsibility with the CARB for ensuring that all state and federal ambient air quality standards are achieved and maintained throughout the urban portions of various counties including Los Angeles. SCAQMD has jurisdiction over an area of approximately 10,743 square miles. Although SCAQMD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts, it does not have the authority to directly regulate the air quality emissions associated with new development projects within the Air Basin, such as the proposed Project. Instead, SCAQMD published the CEQA Air Quality Handbook to assist lead agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties, in evaluating the potential air quality impacts of projects proposed in the Air Basin. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook provides standards, methodologies, and 11 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-27. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1975 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 10 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 procedures for conducting air quality analyses and was relied upon by the City in the preparation of the analysis for this Project.
Although OEHHA provides recommendations for health risk assessments, the proposed Project is within SCAQMD jurisdiction and therefore follows the guidance recommended by SCAQMD. SCAQMD recommends an HRA analysis for projects that include diesel particulate matter from mobile sources at facilities such as truck stops and warehouse distribution centers, 12 and for facilities with stationary diesel
engines.13 This does not apply to the proposed Project as it would not include such facilities. Additionally, the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook does not recommend analysis of Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) from shortterm construction activities.14 Instead, SCAQMD recommends the utilization of localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for projects less than 5 acres, which applies to the proposed Project. These LSTs assess emissions of concern from construction equipment including NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.15 As detailed within the SCEA, the proposed Project would not exceed the appropriate LSTs established by SCAQMD, including particulate matter from equipment exhaust (particulate matter is expressed in terms of PM2.5 and PM10 within CalEEMod).16 The rationale for not requiring a health risk assessment for construction activities is the limited duration of exposure to TACs from short-term activities. The SCAQMD methodology defines health effects from carcinogenic air toxics in terms of individual cancer risk.
Specifically, “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk assessment methodology.
The proposed Project would not represent a long-term source of TAC emissions because the greatest potential for diesel particulate emissions would only occur during excavation/grading activities of approximately 76 days, and other construction activities during the overall construction schedule of approximately 35 months would use fewer pieces of heavy-duty diesel construction equipment in comparison to excavation/grading activities.
17 No residual TAC emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. Therefore, additional evaluation of construction TAC emissions was not warranted.
12 SCAQMD, Mobile Source Toxics Analysis, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysishandbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis. Accessed May 2022. 13 SCAQMD, Estimating Overall Facility Risks, https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/compliance/toxic-hot-spotsab-2588/iws-facilities/dice/estimating-overall-facility-risks. June 2022. 14 SCAQMD, Air Quality Analysis Guidance Handbook, http://www.aqmd.gov/CEQA/hdbk.html. Accessed June 2022. 15 SCAQMD, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-methodology-document.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed June 2022. 16 CalEEMod User Guide, Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod, http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.
Accessed June 2022. 17 See CalEEMod results provided in Appendix A to the SCEA. 1976 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 11 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 SCAQMD provides LSTs for operation of projects less than five acres in size, which are included in the SCEA. As demonstrated in the SCEA, the proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s operational LSTs.
As discussed above, SCAQMD recommends an HRA analysis for projects that include diesel particulate matter from mobile sources at facilities such as truck stops and warehouse distribution centers, 18 and for
facilities with stationary diesel engines.19 This does not apply to the proposed Project as it would not include such facilities. SCAQMD also recommends an HRA analysis where new sensitive land uses are sited near potential sources of air toxic emissions (e.g., freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities).20 In accordance with this recommendation, an HRA (see Appendix B to the SCEA) was prepared to evaluate the potential for increased health risks to future residents of the proposed Project resulting from exposure to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions generated by vehicles on the SR-134 and the on-ramp from Brand Boulevard (See SCEA Table 5.3-5). The HRA shows the excess cancer risk and chronic hazard indices for future residents of the proposed Project based on proximity to a TAC source, the SR-134. 21 The building
façades facing towards SR-134 freeway and the on-ramp from Brand Boulevard would be closest to traffic volumes and would be exposed to higher amounts of DPM emissions than those located further away from the road. The cancer risk and chronic hazard indices for the on-site receptors would gradually decrease as their distance from the freeway increases across the Project site. The maximally exposed individual receptor (MEIR) is represented by the proposed use located closest to the nearest travel lane.
As shown in Table 5.3-5, the maximum cancer risk at the Project site from DPM emissions generated by diesel-vehicle travel along SR-134 for residents and workers is 1.06 in one million and 7.55 in one hundred million, respectively.
22 The cancer risk for residents at the Project site would not exceed SCAQMD’s suggested significance criteria of 10 per one million. Additionally, the maximum non-cancer hazard indices for the proposed Project’s residents and workers are 0.01 for the MEIR receptors, below the significance criterion of 1.
18 SCAQMD, Mobile Source Toxics Analysis, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysishandbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis. Accessed May 2022. 19 SCAQMD, Estimating Overall Facility Risks, https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/compliance/toxic-hot-spotsab-2588/iws-facilities/dice/estimating-overall-facility-risks. June 2022. 20 SCAQMD, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, May 6, 2005, accessed April 2021, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/air-quality-guidance/complete-guidance-document.pdf 21 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-28. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 22 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-28. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1977 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 12 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 The comment also states the SCEA should have analyzed health risks from the approximately 1,198 daily vehicle trips the proposed Project would generate. The SCEA’s air quality analysis does account for the vehicle trips associated with the proposed Project. As shown in the CalEEMod output sheets for the proposed Project, the modeling assumes and analyzes more than the 1,198 weekday daily trips that will be generated by the proposed Project. As shown in Table 5.13-2 of the SCEA, emissions generated during operation of the proposed Project would still result in emission levels below SCAQMD thresholds for criteria pollutants including PM10 and PM2.5 even with analysis of a greater number of trips than will be generated by the proposed Project. SCAQMD’s technical guidance for mobile health risk assessments addresses the analysis of potential cancer risks from diesel particulate emissions from truck idling and movement (such as, but not limited to, truck stops, warehouse and distribution centers, or transit centers), ship hoteling at ports, and train idling.23 None of these activities or conditions apply to the proposed Project. Therefore, since the proposed Project does not trigger imposition of SCAQMD’s criteria for analyzing mobile health risks, and proposed Project emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds, a health risk assessment for the proposed Project’s mobile emissions is not warranted.
SWAPE’s claim that the SCEA does not include a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis is unfounded.
Response to Comment 1-9
First, this comment refers to information provided in an MND. The proposed Project was analyzed using a SCEA not an MND. As discussed previously, this comment letter attaches a paper prepared by SWAPE as Exhibit B. SWAPE estimates air emissions for the Project using the CalEEMod air emissions model, but altered the construction schedule compared to the SCEA, all the while claiming it has included “more sitespecific information and correct input parameters,” but the comment does not provide any basis for the alterations it uses. As discussed in Response to Comment 1-7, the proposed construction schedule for the Project was provided by the Project applicant and reflects the anticipated duration of each phase of construction based on the characteristics of the Project. SWAPE’s CalEEMod analysis does not rely on Project-specific information and the results, therefore, are not an accurate representation of the proposed Project.
Additionally, SWAPE provided an HRA analysis using the AERSCREEN model. The purpose of the AERSCREEN model is to screen for the possibility of a potential impact, whereas AERMOD is the dispersion 23 SCAQMD, Air Quality Analysis Handbook, Mobile Source Toxics Analysis, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rulescompliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis. 1978 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 13 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 model suitable for use in preparing an HRA.
24 A number of points need to be made regarding such a
modeling approach.
First, there are issues regarding the conservative nature of the model itself. The AERSCREEN model is widely acknowledged (including by the US EPA) as being overly conservative.25 AERSCREEN does not account for spatial relation, geography, or local meteorology. It looks at a hypothetical sensitive receptor and assesses impacts as if that receptor is downwind of the source. Rather than being precise about source and receptor locations (both of which are critical in assessing real potential impact), it simply takes the worst-case emissions information (regardless of where it would be generated on site and whether it would move over time) and assume that there is a receptor within 75 meters, regardless of whether airflow actually goes in that direction. AERSCREEN, therefore, may be helpful as an initial screening exercise. In this case, there are sensitive receptors within 75 meters of the Project site, but they are not downwind.
As shown in windrose data available on SCAQMD’s website, 26 wind in the area primarily blows north and
west. The nearest air quality sensitive receptors are east of the Project site. For these reasons, the AERSCREEN run completed in support of the comment overestimates the potential concentration of TACs and, therefore, the corresponding health risk values.
Furthermore, though OEHHA’s guidance recommends evaluation of short-term projects, that guidance supports HRAs written for the purpose of AB 2588 inventories and focuses on stationary sources associated with facilities such as automobile body shops, gasoline service stations, power plants, or treatment facilities. Any given construction activity resulting in emissions would occur on a given portion of the 1.46-acre site for a relatively short duration. For instance, a grader may be operating within 100 meters to the closest receptor on a given day, but the next it could be on the other side of the site. This is not a stationary source.
OEHHA’s guidance recognizes that “The local air pollution control districts sometimes use the risk assessment guidelines for the Hot Spots program in permitting decisions for short-term projects such as construction or waste remediation.” The analysis contained within the SCEA and the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study are not intended to support permitting decisions by the local air district.
There are also issues associated with the information SWAPE entered into the AERSCREEN model. For instance, the screening modeling undertaken by SWAPE modeled both on- and off-site exhaust PM10 emissions as occurring on-site. This has the effect of overestimating on site emissions that would occur 24 SCAQMD, South Coast AQMD Modeling Guidance for AERMOD, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/meteorologicaldata/modeling-guidance. 25 United States Environmental Protection Agency, AERSCREEN User’s Guide, April 2021. 26 SCAQMD, AERMOD Table 1: Meterological Stations & Years of Meteorological Data Available, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/meteorological-data/aermod-table-1. 1979 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 14 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 on site and would therefore result in increased concentrations at the downwind sensitive receptor. Not only do the off-site PM10 exhaust emissions not emanate from the site and occur farther away from the site itself, and therefore the receptors in question, the analysis also characterizes all exhaust PM10 emissions as being emitted from diesel vehicles. This is inaccurate in terms of vehicular mix because all of the construction-period PM10 would not stem from diesel fuel burning sources. Specifically, PM10 estimates include fugitive dust from soil hauling, bulldozing, and truck loading, in addition to equipment exhaust.
27 It is clear that SWAPE’s input data is inaccurate and therefore analysis inappropriately overestimates DPM emissions. These input errors in the comment letter result in model output that is not accurate and is inapplicable to the proposed Project.
Response to Comment 1-10
This comment concludes the letter and reiterates the position taken in the letter that the SCEA did not require all feasible mitigation measures from the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program EIR and does not identify or mitigate the proposed Project’s air quality impacts to a less than significant level. As shown in Responses to Comments 1-1 through 1-10, the SCEA does not need to be revised and the Air Quality analysis in the SCEA is sufficient and adequately discloses the potential impacts of the proposed Project.
Response to Comment 1-11
The comment provides general background information on indoor air quality. No response is warranted.
Response to Comment 1-12
This comment alleges indoor formaldehyde will result in a significant air quality impact that was not analyzed. The 14-year old California New Home Study (CNHS) referenced was prepared by the commenter, and the conclusions on potential formaldehyde exposure are based on outdated data on construction materials. The 2016-18 CNHS referenced presents assumptions about the measurement of formaldehyde levels in single family homes, but does not provide any reference supporting its contention that indoor concentrations were not adequately measured. This comment recognizes that the Project would be built with CARB compliant composite wood products, assumes continuous occupancy, and on that basis, concludes cancer risks would be elevated. The commenter assumes, without presenting any evidence, that the resins used in construction materials that will be used in the Project will be formaldehyde laden resins. Moreover, the commenter also assumes, again without any evidence, that the Project developer will furnish the apartments, and on that basis concludes the SCEA is inadequate. Please see Response to Comment 1-6 for additional discussion of indoor formaldehyde. 27 CalEEMod User Guide, Appendix A: Calculation Details for CalEEMod, http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide.
Accessed June 2022.
1980 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 15 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 Response to Comment 1-13
The comment indicates that the proposed Project should include a mechanical supply of outdoor air ventilation to allow for a habitable interior environment with closed windows and doors. This conclusion is based on faulty premises. First, the commenter’s conclusions are based on studies of single family homes and the Project is a multi-family high-rise residential rental project, thus it is not comparable for this reason. The comment bases its conclusions on a 2007 study of behaviors of single family home owners with respect to opening windows; this high rise Project does not present the same concerns for keeping windows closed due to safety/security, noise, dust and odor that are concerns for single family residential home owners. Based on this faulty premise, the commenter concludes there will be a “low outdoor air exchange” rate, but this conclusion is not based on consideration of the characteristics of the Project. The commenter concludes, without evidence, that the Project is a “sound impacted” site because of its proximity to roadways. See Response to Comment 1-6 for additional discussion of indoor formaldehyde.
The proposed Project would comply with the most recent 2019 California Green Building Standards Code which requires heating/ventilating/air conditioning (HVAC) systems which would provide code compliant ventilation to the proposed building.
Response to Comment 1-14
The comment states that residents of the Project site would incur health effects associated with exposure to dangerous levels of PM2.5, for which the South Coast Air Basin is in nonattainment for the California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS). However, as held by the California Supreme Court (Court) in the California Building Industry Association v. BAAQMD, (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, CEQA reviews the impacts of a project on the environment rather than the effects of the environment on the residents or users of a project. The Court held that “agencies subject to CEQA generally are not required to analyze the impact of existing environmental conditions on a project‘s future users or residents. But when a proposed project risks exacerbating those environmental hazards or conditions that already exist, an agency must analyze the potential impact of such hazards on future residents or users. In those specific instances, it is the project’s impact on the environment – and not the environment’s impact on the project – that compels an evaluation of how future residents or users could be affected by exacerbated conditions.” Id. at 392.
As directed by the Court, the potential environmental impact of a project on the existing environment would only need to be analyzed if the Project would exacerbate an existing adverse condition. The comment asserts that the SCEA should have evaluated the health impacts of existing environmental PM2.5 to residents of the Project site.
The SCEA does, however, evaluate the Project’s PM2.5 emissions in Table 5.3-3 and Table 5.3-4, and determined, based on this analysis, that localized emissions of PM2.5 generated by the proposed Project 1981 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 16 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 would be below the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds (LSTs).28 The Project would not, therefore, exacerbate the existing concentrations of PM 2.5 and no further analysis of the effect of the proposed Project on existing PM 2.5 levels is required.
Contrary to the commenter’s belief, an HRA was conducted for the proposed Project and is included in Appendix B of the SCEA. The HRA evaluated the potential for increased health risks to future residents of the proposed Project, specifically health risks resulting from exposure to diesel exhaust emissions (a TAC) generated by vehicles on the SR-134 and the on-ramp from Brand Boulevard. Table 5.3-5 from the SCEA shows the estimated range of excess cancer risk and chronic hazard indices for future residents of the proposed Project.
29 The building façades facing towards SR-134 freeway. The on-ramp from Brand Boulevard would be nearest to traffic volumes and would be exposed to higher amounts of DPM emissions than those located further away from the road. The cancer risk and chronic hazard indices for the on-site receptors would gradually decrease as their distance from the freeway increases across the Project site.
The maximally exposed individual receptor (MEIR) is represented by the proposed use located closest from the nearest travel lane.
As shown in Table 5.3-5, the maximum cancer risk at the Project site from DPM emissions generated by diesel-vehicle travel along SR-134 for residents and workers are 1.06 in one million and 7.55 in one hundred million, respectively.30 The cancer risk for residents at the site would not exceed SCAQMD’s suggested significance criteria of 10 per one million. Additionally, the maximum non-cancer hazard indices for the proposed Project’s residents and workers are 0.01 for the MEIR receptors, below the significance criterion of 1.
No further analysis is required regarding the effects of the environment on future residents of the Project.
Response to Comment 1-15
This comment recommends indoor formaldehyde, outdoor air ventilation, and PM2.5 outdoor air mitigation measures. Please see Response to Comment 1-6 and 1-12.
Response to Comment 1-16
28 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-27. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 29 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-28. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 30 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Page 5.0-28. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1982 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 17 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 The comment asserts the SCEA does not adequately evaluate hazards and hazardous materials, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts and, therefore, an EIR should be prepared. As discussed in Responses to Comments 1-4 through 1-9, 1-7, and 1-24 through 1-27, the SCEA does not need to be revised and the analysis in the SCEA of potential hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and health risk impacts is adequate. The Project will not result in significant impacts that require the preparation of an EIR as asserted in this comment.
Response to Comment 1-17
This comment states a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was not prepared. The comment asserts a Phase I ESA is routinely undertaken in the preparation of CEQA documents and is necessary for inclusion in an EIR. While information from a Phase I ESA may be incorporated into an environmental review document if one has been prepared, preparation of a Phase I ESA is not required by CEQA. The Environmental Checklist Form included in Appendix G to the CEQA Guidelines asks if a project would be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Gov. Code Sec 65962.5 refers to the “Cortese List” database maintained by the California Environmental Protection Agency.
Additionally, the appropriate CEQA documentation prepared for the proposed Project is an SCEA and not an EIR because, with mitigation, the Project will not result in significant impacts. The SCEA analyzed hazards and hazardous materials impacts of the proposed Project using the thresholds in the CEQA Guidelines, specifically determining if the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code § 65962.5. A geographical search for hazardous materials sites, as defined in Government Code Section 66962.5, was conducted based on a review of these databases. The Project site is not located on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5.31
Construction of the proposed Project would involve the routine handling of small quantities of hazardous or potentially hazardous materials, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricants, and other petroleum-based products used to operate and maintain construction equipment and vehicles on the Project site. The proposed Project generally would not produce significant amounts of hazardous waste, nor use or transport hazardous waste beyond those materials typically used in a residential development. Hazardous waste and materials transported, used, and stored would be conducted in accordance with applicable 31 City of Glendale, Community Development Department. Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Lucia Park Project. SCH Number 2022010297. Pages 3-93. Available at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/65609/637781200347330000. Accessed March 2022. 1983 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 18 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 State and federal laws during construction and operation of the proposed Project. The SCEA determined the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to hazards and hazardous materials. No further analysis is warranted.
Response to Comment 1-18
The comment outlines the capabilities of CalEEMod, specifically regarding default model values and the user’s ability to override default values as long as they are justified by substantial evidence. The comment claims that the proposed Project’s CalEEMod analysis is not consistent with information disclosed in the SCEA. Specific concerns regarding the CalEEMod analysis are addressed in Responses to Comment 1-19 and 1-20.
Response to Comment 1-19 and 1-20
This comment claims that several default values were changed without any substantiation and alleges the evaluation incorrectly utilized area and architectural coating mitigation for operational emissions. As the commenter notes, the Project is divided into four phases of construction for purposes of analysis. These, are typical construction phases defined by the construction contractor, and constitute substantial evidence of what will occur on the site during demolition and construction of the proposed Project. The commenter does not identify what additional information is required, or why defining and describing the four construction phases is “insufficient,” or why definition of the typical construction phases is not justification for the model adjustments. The commenter’s own criticism in Comment 1-20 illustrate that the time frames for the construction phases are verifiable, e.g. demolition- 23 days, grading -76 days (this project includes subterranean parking as set forth in the Project description), 662 days for construction, 380 days for application of architectural coatings, and 66 days for paving, all of which are appropriate time frames based on the construction contractors reasonable estimates for a Project of this size, and the Commenter has not shown why these time frames are not reasonable or justified. Please also see Response to Comment 1-7.
Response to Comment 1-21
This comment claims that several default values were changed without any substantiation for changing these default values and underestimated emissions calculated from CalEEMod. The Commenter does not explain why compliance with regulatory standards does not substantiate assuming low VOC paints will be used as the Project in order to comply with specific laws or regulations. As the court explained in Oakland Heritage Alliance v City of Oakland (2011) 195 CA4th 884, 906, "a condition requiring compliance with regulations is a common and reasonable mitigation measure and may be proper where it is reasonable to expect compliance." The court upheld the city's reliance on standards in the building code and city building 1984 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 19 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 ordinances to mitigate seismic impacts. The Guidelines specify that reliance on compliance with a regulatory permit or similar process is sufficient mitigation if compliance with such standards can be reasonably expected, based on substantial evidence, to reduce the impact to the specified performance standard. 14 Cal Code Regs §15126.4(a)(1).
The commenter presumes, without evidence, that the Project will not comply with regulatory standards and on that basis cites to the AEP CEQA Portal Paper (which does not represent binding law and is legally disclaimed (p. 10-11). There is no law requiring mitigation measures to go “above and beyond” existing regulatory requirements where there is no evidence of significant impacts in the first instance. There is no reason to expect the Project would not comply with SCAQMD Rules 1113, and the commenter has provided none. Please also see Responses to Comments 1-7, 1-19, and 1-20 Response to Comment 1-22
This comment claims the updated CalEEMod model prepared for the comment letter estimates the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions exceed the applicable SQACMD threshold, resulting in a potentially significant air quality impact. However, the model the commenter prepared fails to disclose the parameters it used for creating an AQ model run that results in the Project generating a significant air quality impact, and on that basis has not shown that the SCEA air quality analysis is inadequate or wrong in any way, and does not provide any substantial evidence of an air quality impact. Please also see Response to Comment 1-9.
Response to Comment 1-23
This comment claims the SCEA fails to mention TAC emissions associated with proposed Project operation and, as such, the evaluation of the proposed Project’s potential health risk impacts is incorrect. Please also see Response to Comment 1-8 and 1-9.
Response to Comment 1-24
This comment discusses the screening-level analysis conducted in the comment letter that incorrectly indicates a potentially significant health risk impact. Please also see Responses to Comments 1-8 and 1-9.
Response to Comment 1-25
This comment incorrectly states the analysis of the greenhouse gas impacts in the SCEA is inadequate.
Please also see Responses to Comments 1-4, 1-7, and 1-26.
Response to Comment 1-26
1985 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 20 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 This comment claims the quantitative GHG analysis in the SCEA and Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study is unsubstantiated and underestimates emissions. Please also see Responses to Comments 1-4 and 1-7.
Response to Comment 1-27
This comment utilized SCAQMD’s 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 MTCO2e per year as a GHG threshold. This is not an applicable threshold because it has not been adopted by SCAQMD. There are no federal, State, or local quantitative adopted thresholds of significance for addressing a project’s GHG emissions. As such, the SCEA correctly quantified GHG emissions for the proposed Project and, in the absence of any adopted numeric threshold, then evaluated the significance of these emissions by considering whether the proposed Project conflicts with applicable regulations or requirements adopted to implement a Statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction of mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. This approach is consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.4(b)(2) and GHG threshold
5.8(b). As discussed in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.4(a), The determination of the significance of greenhouse gas emissions calls for a careful judgment by the lead agency consistent with the provisions in section 15064. A lead agency shall make a goodfaith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate the amount of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project. A lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to:
(1) Quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project; and/or (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance based standards.32 Specifically, the SCEA assessed the proposed Project’s conformity with regional and local GHG reduction plans including SCAG’s 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the City’s Greener Glendale Plan, and the City’s South Glendale Community Plan EIR. The SCEA found that the proposed Project would not conflict with these plans and would, therefore, not result in a significant GHG impact.
Response to Comment 1-28
The comment states design features should be included as mitigation measures. As discussed in Response to Comment 1-4 through 1-9, 1-7, and 1-24 through 1-27, the SCEA does not need to be revised and the proposed Project’s analysis of potential hazards and hazardous materials, air quality, and health risk impacts is sufficient. As such, further mitigation measures are not warranted. 32 CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a). Available at: https://www.califaep.org/docs/2022_CEQA_Statue_and_Guidelines.pdf.
Accessed June 2022.
1986 of 2287
Responses to Comments
Lucia Park Project 21 City of Glendale
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Responses to Comments June 2022 Response to Comment 1-29
The comment includes a disclaimer on the analysis conducted by SWAPE. No response is warranted. 1987 of 2287
6000-006j
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
KENDRA D. HARTMANN*
DARIEN K. KEY
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
MICHAEL R. SEVILLE
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO
*Not admitted in California.
Licensed in Colorado.
SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000
SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080
T E L : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 1 6 6 0
F A X : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 5 0 6 2
ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
A T T O RN E Y S A T L A W
5 2 0 C A P I T O L M A L L , S U I T E 3 5 0
S A C R A M E N T O , C A 9 5 8 1 4 - 47 21
___________
T E L : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 1
F A X : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 9
k c a r m i c h a e l @ a d a m s b r o a d w e l l . c o m printed on recycled paper
March 10, 2022
Via Email and Overnight Mail
Vilia Zemaitaitis
Planner
City of Glendale
633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103
Glendale, CA 91206
Email: [email protected]
Philip Lanzafame
Community Development Director
City of Glendale
633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103
Glendale, CA 91206
Email: [email protected]
Re: Comments on the Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment – Lucia Park Project (Case Nos. PDR 2119308, PDA1806045) (SCH: 2022010297)
Dear Ms. Zemaitaitis and Mr. Lanzafame:
We are writing on behalf of Coalition for Responsible Equitable Economic Development Los Angeles (“CREED LA”) to provide comments to the City of Glendale (“City”) on the Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment1 (“SCEA”) prepared for the Lucia Park Project, Case Nos. PDR 2119308, PDA1806045, SCH 2022010297 (“Project”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”)2 proposed by Cimmarusti Holdings, LLC (“Applicant”).
The Project proposes the demolition of the existing parking structure and two-story commercial building fronting Maryland Place located at 625 N. Maryland Avenue and construction of a new 294-unit, 24-story multi-family residential building on a 63,760 SF (1.48 acre) project site zoned DSP Gateway District. The Project will be located at 620 North Brand Blvd and 625 North Maryland Avenue in Glendale, adjacent to State Route 134 (“SR 134”). The proposed Floor Area Ratio 1 City of Glendale, Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for The Lucia Park Project (January 2022) available at https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2022010297 2 Pub. Resources Code (“PRC”) §§ 21000 et seq.
2-1
Responses to Comments
Comment Letter No. 2
Lucia Park Project
Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment
City of Glendale
March 2022
1988 of 2287
March 10, 2022