Glendale City Council
June 14, 2022

A G E N D A

JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U- verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live , on YouTube.com/myglendale , and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices using a free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at glendaleca.gov/agendas . Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. DVDs of the proceedings are available for purchase in the City Clerk's Office.

For public comments and questions during the meeting, call (818) 937-8100. Public comments on a specific agenda item will be taken when that agenda item is discussed. If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (818) 548-2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please specify the language for which you require translation. The exclusive use of City provided interpreters is not required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.

JUNE 14, 2022

ROLL CALL
- 2:00 PM
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re: Posting of Agenda.

The Agenda for the Tuesday, June 14, 2022 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on June 8, 2022 on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall. 1 TYPED 6/14/2022 9:33:50 AM
06 14 22
CC HA
A JOINT PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council and Housing Authority is hereby called to meet at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 , in the Council Chamber, 613 E.

Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to Consider the Following Item(s) of Business, to wit;

1. Community Services and Parks, re: FY 2022-2023 Proposed Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Programs

1. Council Resolution adopting a Final Negative Declaration

2. Council Motion to approve a FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and modified by staff, and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval

3. Housing Authority Motion to approve a FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; and authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and modified by staff, and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board

2. Community Development, re: Adoption of the FY 2022-23 Glendale Housing Authority Budget with Approval of a Professional Services Contract Amendment with Emphasys Software

1. Council Resolution Making Findings and Approving Expenditures of Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds for Administration and Planning and Expenditures Outside Redevelopment Project Areas for the FY 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget

2. Housing Authority Resolution Making Findings and Approving Expenditures of Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds for Administration and Planning and Expenditures Outside Redevelopment Project Areas for the FY 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget and Adopting the FY 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget

3. Housing Authority Motion to Approve an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Emphasys Software (C105966A) to Increase the Contract Amount by $77,418 for a New “Not to Exceed” Contract of $486,425 for a Computer Software License with Maintenance and Hosting of the Housing Authority Owner Portal; and to Extend the Agreement Term for One Year to End August 31, 2023

ADJOURNMENT
2 TYPED 6/14/2022 9:33:50 AM
06 14 22
CC HA
1 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: FY 2022-2023 Proposed Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Programs

1. Council Resolution adopting a Final Negative Declaration;

2. City Council Motion to approve a FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and modified by staff, and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval;

3. Housing Authority Motion to approve a FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; and authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and modified by staff, and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 14, 2022 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) totals $3,529,800 for submission to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for final approval.

The CDBG Advisory Committee made funding recommendations for the CDBG program as outlined in Exhibit 3 based on program priorities, an estimated entitlement allocation from HUD, and a CDBG Contingency Plan to increase/decrease funding recommendations based on the final entitlement allocations when released by HUD. The CDBG Committee reviewed proposals from community agencies for Public Social 3 of 117
2 1
3 3
5 6
Services (PSS) and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), conducted interviews with the agencies and recommended funding for eleven (11) community agencies for PSS, four (4) community agencies for CIP, and one City CIP project, Fremont Park Renovation Project in FY2022-2023.

The CoC Board approved the FY 2022-2023 funding recommendations in the proposed Annual Action Plan for the ESG Program as outlined in Exhibit 2 based on program priorities, an entitlement allocation of $161,563. The ESG funding plan that is developed is a two-year plan. ESG programs that request continued funding for the subsequent year and meet their outcomes and performance goals are allowed to be renewed for funding subject to review and approval by the CoC Board.

The Housing Authority uses HOME funding to develop affordable housing projects and programs. It periodically updates a Statement of Interest to reflect funding and priorities for the HOME allocation it receives each year from HUD. It also seeks input from community members through the Annual Action Plan process. Funding priorities for FY 22-23 include development of the following affordable housing projects:
900 E Broadway
920 E Broadway
515 Pioneer
Staff is requesting City Council/Housing Authority to approve the proposed FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800, as presented in Exhibit 2, to submit to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)., and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.
4 of 117
3 1
3 3
5 6

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A

RECOMMENDATION
City Council:
1) Approve a Resolution adopting a Final Negative Declaration for the project. 2) Approve a Council Motion for FY 2022-23 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; authorize submission of the Annual Action plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee (modified by staff), and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

Housing Authority:
1) Approve a Housing Authority Motion for FY 2022-23 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; authorize submission of the Annual Action plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee (modified by staff), and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board.

BACKGROUND
The City of Glendale (City) has been receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD since the inception of the CDBG program in 1974, thereby, marking it the 48th anniversary of the Glendale CDBG program. The Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) program was added in 1987 and the Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) program was added in 1992.

The national and local objectives of the CDBG program are to:

1. eliminate conditions of slums and blight, and

2. provide programs and services that benefit low and moderate-income persons, including the homeless.

The objectives of the ESG program are to:

1. engage homeless individuals and families living on the street;

2. improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families;

3. help operate these shelters;

4. provide essential services to shelter residents;

5. rapidly re-house homeless individuals and families; and

6. prevent families and individuals from becoming homeless. 5 of 117
4 1
3 3
5 6
The objective of the HOME program is to provide and preserve affordable housing for low income persons.

The City is responsible for following HUD guidelines and developing a 5-year Consolidated Plan and an Annual Action Plan for the use of the funds.

Consolidated Plan
As a condition of eligibility for CDBG, ESG, and HOME entitlement funds, the City is required to submit to HUD a five-year strategic plan “Consolidated Plan” for the use of these funds. The current Five Year 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) was approved by the City Council in June 2020 and submitted and approved by HUD. The ConPlan provides a profile of the City, and establishes program priorities, funding strategies and proposed goals for addressing community development, housing, and homeless needs in the community. The ConPlan also incorporates other funding sources, programs and initiatives that assist in addressing the City’s community development, housing, and homeless needs; and strategies for leveraging and coordinating these resources.

The ConPlan is the primary planning document that HUD uses to measure the City’s effectiveness and to approve the submission of Annual Action Plans and other funding applications to HUD. The Annual Action Plans are comprised of specific projects the City plans to implement to meet the objectives of the ConPlan every fiscal year.

Annual Action Plan
In developing the Annual Action Plan, HUD requires that the City involve citizens in the plan development and approval process. This process includes is a combined effort for CDBG, ESG, and Home programs and includes community meetings, board meetings and oversight boards.

CDBG:

The most prominent program in the ConPlan/Action Plan development process, is the CDBG program. Annual planning for the CDBG program includes outreach to Glendale non-profit community agencies to introduce the CDBG program and process; hosting a community meeting to identify community needs and set program priorities, pre- designating funds to City CIP; issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) to community agencies for PSS programs and CIP; working with the CDBG Advisory Committee to review the proposals, interview the agencies that submitted proposals and recommend funding community agencies; monitoring current fiscal year programs; and reallocating funds as necessary.

CDBG ADVISORY COMMITTEE:

In order to achieve citizen involvement in the plan development and approval process, the City Council appoints a citizen CDBG Advisory Committee, whose responsibility is to help oversee the CDBG planning process. The Committee’s current responsibilities include:
6 of 117
5 1
3 3
5 6
Reviewing and commenting on the annual community needs assessment strategy; Recommending program priorities, based on findings from the needs assessment, as well as input from the City Council;
Evaluating funding proposals;
Interviewing community agencies and City departments that submit project proposals;
Recommending projects for funding;
Reviewing sub-recipient performance, such as site visits and outcome reviews; Reviewing and approving revisions or amendments to projects throughout the program year; and
Reviewing and recommending reprogramming of CDBG funds.

The current CDBG Advisory Committee is comprised of the following members:

Committee Member Appointing Council Member

1. Ronnie Gharibian (Chair) Councilmember Ara Najarian

2. Anita Quiñonez-Gabrielian (Vice Chair) Councilmember Paula Devine

3. Zanku Armenian Councilmember Daniel Brotman

4. Armik Avedisian Mayor Ardy Kassakhian

5. Noraier Ghazarian Councilmember Vrej Agajanian
CDBG funds are divided into three categories: Administration, Public Social Services, and Capital Improvement Projects.

Administration (Planning, Program Management and Oversight):

HUD allows jurisdictions to use 20% of their CDBG entitlement funds for administration of the CDBG program to ensure that they have the capacity to comply with the administratively laden HUD requirements and minimize financial risks. The core functions of Administration are planning, monitoring, contract compliance, financial management and project coordination. HUD is becoming stricter in requiring more low-income documentation from the sub-recipients in order to show eligibility for CDBG funds, which translates to greater financial risk and need for management and oversight.

Public Social Services:

HUD imposes a statutory limit of 15% on the amount of CDBG entitlement funds that can be used for social services regardless of how great the local need is for these services.

The basic HUD eligibility criteria for social service projects are: 1) the program constitutes a new or expanded level of service at the time that it is first funded, 2) the program serves over 60% low-income families (those who earn less than 80% of the County median), and 3) the CDBG funds are not used to substitute another available funding source. In addition to HUD eligibility criteria, agencies will have to meet financial capacity prequalification guidelines, such as submission of two years of financial statement compilations and copies of Board minutes approving the financial statements, to be eligible to apply for City’s CDBG Program funds.
7 of 117
6 1
3 3
5 6
Capital Improvement and Neighborhood Improvement Projects:

Generally, capital and neighborhood improvement funds represent 65% of CDBG entitlement funds, plus any available reprogrammed funds, which can only be used for capital and neighborhood improvement projects. Projects that qualify for this funding category include: community centers, such as parks, libraries, recreation centers, senior centers, youth centers, employment centers and social service centers; handicapped accessibility projects anywhere in the City; public improvements in low income neighborhoods; commercial rehabilitation; and economic development projects.

Traditionally, as part of the funding allocation plan, the City Council pre-designates and pre-approves City CIP deemed a priority, and authorizes the issuance of a Request for Funding Proposal (RFP) to community agencies for the remainder of the CDBG funds.

Proposals are solicited from community agencies for PSS and the balance of capital improvement funds for community CIP. Any qualified non-profit community agency or public agency is eligible to apply for CDBG funds provided that projects meet one of the two broad national objectives: 1) serving low-income persons, or 2) preventing or eliminating conditions of slums and blight. In addition, funded projects are required to serve primarily Glendale residents and not to discriminate in the provision of services.

Furthermore, projects that meet the identified program priorities are given preference for funding.

The proposal evaluation criteria used by the CDBG Advisory Committee includes:
1) Overall quality of the proposal;
2) Whether the project meets a program priority;
3) Ability of the applicant to substantiate that the project meets a community need; 4) Whether the proposal clearly articulates a target population/outreach strategy; 5) Financial capacity of the organization,
6) Demonstration of coordination and collaboration with other agencies/programs; 7) Program goals and outcomes;
8) Feasibility of proposed implementation plan;
9) Budget, cost effectiveness and leveraging of funds; and 10) Demonstrated experience, effectiveness and administrative capacity of sponsoring Organization/City Department, including performance history.

Additional tools provided to the Committee to evaluate capacity and effectiveness of proposals include: 1) mid-year performance reports, 2) financial analysis report prepared by staff for each non-profit organization, and 3) proposal evaluation rating forms.

ESG PROGRAM:

The ESG Program follows the same process as CDBG, in terms of identification of homeless priorities, issuance of RFPs and proposal evaluation, except that ESG funding proposals are reviewed and recommended by a separate homeless proposal review committee comprised of the Continuum of Care (CoC) Board. The CoC Board is guided by the specific needs of the CoC model of homeless services adopted by the Glendale 8 of 117
7 1
3 3
5 6
CoC. The ESG funding plan is developed is a two-year plan. ESG programs that request continued funding for the subsequent year and meet their program outcomes and performance goals are allowed to be renewed for funding subject to review and approval by the CoC Board.

The published national objective of the ESG program is to help with the expansion, improvement and operation of emergency shelter facilities, supportive services, rapid re- housing, and homeless prevention.

The current CoC Board is comprised of the following members:

Board Member Agency
Melissa Younesian, Chair Verdugo Jobs Center
Richard Corral, Vice Chair CEO/Principal Consultant, Corral Consulting Lt. Alex Krikorian Glendale Police Department
Baron Hopkins Homeless Alumni
Gabrielle Waring Downtown Women’s Center

HOME
The Housing Authority is a Participating Jurisdiction under the HOME Program. As such, it receives an allocation each year directly from HUD to carry out affordable housing programs and projects.

The Housing Authority periodically updates a Statement of Interest to reflect its funding priorities. Like the CDBG and ESG programs, it seeks input from the community through the Annual Action Plan process to determine what housing needs exist. It also solicits Requests for Proposal from developers when sufficient funding is available for development of an affordable housing project. A review team consisting of city staff reviews proposals and provides recommendations to the Housing Authority for viable affordable housing developments.

The Housing Authority uses HOME funding, as well as other funding sources including Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF), and Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program to create affordable housing programs and projects. The City Council can also assign local Measure S funds to housing related purposes.

ANALYSIS
The FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan process for CDBG began on September 15, 2021, when staff held the fourth annual CDBG Open House event in a virtual platform inviting over 99 non-profit organizations to participate via Microsoft Teams. Twenty-two (22) representatives from twelve (12) non-profit community agencies attended the Open House to learn about the CDBG program.

In the Fall of 2021, a community meeting was held to gather input from residents to identify needs and determine program priorities for CDBG, ESG and HOME. Three platforms were used to gather comments, which included: 1) a virtual community meeting held on September 29, 2021 via Microsoft Teams with twenty-one (21) residents in 9 of 117
8 1
3 3
5 6
attendance, 2) an opportunity to email comments between September 27, 2021 and October 1, 2021, no comments were received, and 3) a Telephone conference between September 27, 2021 and October 1, 2021, no comments were received.

On November 2, 2021, as part of the annual program planning cycle, staff presented the CDBG Advisory Committee recommendations to City Council/Housing Authority for approval and they approved: a preliminary proposed FY 2022-2023 CDBG Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category; program priorities; and issuance of an RFP for PSS programs and CIP based on estimated $2,000,000 CDBG entitlement funding from HUD.

The estimated $2,000,000 was based on previous year estimates. At the same meeting staff had recommended a Section 108 Loan Repayment, over 10 years, for the Fremont Park Renovation Project, as the City’s pre-designated CIP project. However, Council requested that staff look for alternative funding options for the project.

The Proposed FY 2022-2023 Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category originally approved by Council/Housing Authority was as follows, based on an estimated $2,000,000 in CDBG Program funds and $66,607 in unappropriated fund balance from previously closed CDBG projects from fiscal years 2015 through 2019:
$300,000 (15% of entitlement funds) for PSS.
$1,300,000 (65% of entitlement funds) and $66,607 (unappropriated fund balance) for capital and neighborhood improvements:
o$966,607 for community CIP.
o$400,000 for pre-designated City projects, including:
$400,000 Fremont Park Renovation Project 22/23
$400,000 (20% of entitlement funds) for planning, program management and oversight.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS:

When the RFP was issued on November 3, 2021, it was based on the estimated $2,000,000 in entitlement funds. Eighteen (18) CDBG funding proposals were received and evaluated by staff (through a Strength and Weakness Analysis) and the CDBG Advisory Committee. The Committee, in two full day sessions on March 4, 2022 and March 7, 2022, interviewed each community agency requesting PSS funds and CIP, respectively. The Committee deliberated and developed funding recommendations based on the City Council/Housing Authority approved funding allocation plan by funding category as presented in Exhibit 3. The Committee also approved a CDBG Contingency Plan in case the final HUD allocations were higher/lower than the estimated $2,000,000.

The Contingency Plan approved for PSS programs was to equally increase/decrease funding to all agencies recommended for funding, with the exception of Housing Rights Center. The Contingency Plan approved for CIP was to equally increase/decrease funding to Campbell Center Hamilton House Project and YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena Lexington Campus Project.

The FY 2022-2023 federal budget was approved by Congress and final allocation for all 10 of 117
9 1
3 3
5 6
entitlement programs was released on May 13, 2022, after the CDBG Advisory Committee meeting. The final FY 2022-2023 HUD Entitlement Funds for all programs and CDBG unappropriated fund balance from previous years is summarized below and is part of the final proposed Annual Action Plan: (See Exhibit 2) CDBG $1,731,797
CDBG Unappropriated Fund Balance from 2015-2019 66,607 CDBG Total $1,798,404
ESG $ 161,563
HOME $1,569,833
Total $3,529,800
Based on the final HUD allocations, the final proposed FY 2022-2023 Funding Allocation Plan for the CDBG Program is as follows:
$259,770 (15% of entitlement funds) for PSS.
$1,125,668 (65% of entitlement funds) and $66,607 (unappropriated fund balance) for capital improvements:
o$966,607 for community CIP.
o$225,667 for pre-designated City projects, including:
$225,667 Fremont Park Renovation Project 22/23
$346,359 (20% of entitlement funds) for planning, program management and oversight.

The Committee also recommended predesignating $400,000 to the City’s Fremont Park Renovation Project for FY 2023-2024.

Public Social Services
Fourteen (14) proposals were received for PSS programs totaling $772,070, which was $512,300 over the available amount of $259,770. Eleven (11) programs were recommended for funding, which included funding one (1) new agency: Armenian Bar Association. Three agencies were not recommended for funding in FY 2022-2023:

Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin, Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America, and Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts.

Below is a summary table of Public Social Services final funding recommendations for FY 2022-2023, incorporating the CDBG Contingency Plan:

PROGRAM CATEGORY/PROJECTS/SPONSOR

RECOMMENDED
FY 22-23 FUNDING
YOUTH AND TEEN PROGRAMS:

Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling, CASPS $30,977 Youth Employment, Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) $20,977

ADULT COUNSELING & CASE MANAGEMENT
11 of 117
10 1
3 3
5 6
The highest percentage of PSS funding is recommended for homeless services programs at 50.38% ($130,862). The next highest funding allocation by program type is adult counseling and case management programs at 29.62% ($76,954) and lastly, youth programs, which include: in-school programs, enrichment programs, afterschool programs, youth employment, and teen programs at 20% ($51,954).

In addition to the CDBG funding for PSS programs, the City uses other non-CDBG funds to leverage programs provided by community agencies. For example, the City has leveraged Section 8 Earned Administration funds and CDBG funds to fund the Housing Rights Center’s Fair Housing Program for fair housing services and tenant landlord information. The current contract amount for the FY 2021-2022 Fair Housing Program is $20,299 which includes $10,299 in CDBG funding and $10,000 in Section 8 Earned Administration funding. For FY 2022-2023, a similar split is recommended for Council/Housing Authority approval, $10,000 in CDBG funding and $10,000 in Section 8 Earned Administration funding for a total of $20,000 to be allocated to the Housing Rights Center’s Fair Housing program for FY 2022-2023. Section 8 Earned Administration funding for the HRC contract is budgeted in the FY 2022-2023 Community Development Section 8 budget.

Capital Improvement Projects
This year, four community agencies submitted four (4) proposals for consideration totaling $1,398,186, which was $431,579 over the available amount of $966,607. All four (4) project proposals were recommended for funding by the CDBG Advisory Committee PROGRAMS:

Pro Bono Legal Services, Armenian Bar Association $15,977 Community Outreach Project, Armenian Relief Society $50,977 Fair Housing Program, Housing Rights Center
(Additional funding from Section 8 Earned Administration Funds-$10,000 for a total allocation of $20,000)
$10,000
HOMELESS PROGRAMS:

Homeless Prevention Program/Loaves and Fishes, Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. $25,977
Homeless Outreach Case Management, Ascencia $20,977
Family Promise of the Verdugos $10,977
Domestic Violence Services, Door of Hope $25,977
People’s Choice Market Food Pantry, Salvation Army $20,977 Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence, YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $25,977
TOTAL PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $259,770
12 of 117
11 1
3 3
5 6
along with a CDBG Contingency Plan to increase/decrease funding from the following two agencies based on the final HUD allocation amount:
The Campbell Center Hamilton House Renovation Project
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena YWCA Lexington Campus CIP Since the final allocations came in considerably lower than expected, in order to avoid a larger impact to the community agencies funded for CIP, staff is recommending to reduce the City CIP - Fremont Park Renovation Project funding allocation, instead of following the CDBG Contingency Plan approved by the Committee.

Below is a summary table of the Capital Improvement Project final funding recommendations for FY 2022-2023:

CDBG Cancelled/Unused Funds
Furthermore, staff is requesting for Council to authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval. This authorization will allow staff to work with the CDBG Advisory Committee to reallocate funds should there be a need without having to come back to Council for such a small amount.

RECOMMENDED PROJECT/SPONSOR

CDBG ADIVSORY

COMMITTEE

RECOMMENDED
FY 22-23 FUNDING
STAFF

RECOMMENDED
FY22-23

FUNDING

COMMUNITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROJECTS
CDBG Re-piping Project, Ascencia $31,840 $31,840
Hamilton House Renovation Project, The
Campbell Center $290,717.50 $377,883.50
FY22-23 First Floor All Inclusive Locker Room
Project, YMCA of Glendale $179,000 $179,000
YWCA Lexington Campus CIP, YWCA of
Glendale and Pasadena $290,717.50 $377,883.50

PRE-DESIGNATED CITY PROJECTS
Fremont Park Renovation Project 22/23,
Community Services & Parks $400,000 $225,667
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: $1,192,275 $1,192,275
13 of 117
12 1
3 3
5 6
Exhibit 3 provides a Summary List of FY 2022-2023 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations.

ESG PROGRAM:

On January 8, 2021, the CoC Board met and recommended funding three existing ESG community projects for FY 2021-22. The CoC Board did recommend funding a City ESG Administration request of $7,108 for City accounting services and $5,219 for HMIS activities. Programs that were approved for funding in FY2021-2022 by the CoC Board and meet their outcomes and performance goals may be recommended for renewal for FY2022-2023.

The previously approved funding recommendations have been updated based on the FY 2022-23 funding allocation, which is $8,787 less than the previous year (Please refer to Exhibit 7.) Traditionally, no more than 40% of the total allocation can be used for Shelter Operations. However, during FY 2021-22, HUD waived this requirement due to the pandemic. In FY2022-2023, the City will revert back to the traditional methodology used for each ESG component per HUD’s recommendation. As a result, there was a reduction in funding for the Shelter Operations component. The reduction was proportionality split between two agencies (YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena and Ascencia). Furthermore, the changes in funding amounts were discussed and approved by the agencies and the CoC Board.

The FY 2022-23 ESG funding recommendations are as follows:

Ascencia- Emergency Housing Program $43,372
YWCA of Glendale-Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency
Shelter Program (Rapid Re-housing) $75,300
Catholic Charities- Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program $36,637 City HMIS $0
Accounting for use of Grant Administration $6,254
GRAND TOTAL $161,563
HOME PROGRAM:

HOME projects are not solicited in the same manner as the CDBG and ESG programs.

Specific HOME projects are developed by the Housing Authority on an ongoing basis (through a continuous Statement of Interest that is updated periodically to reflect funding and priorities and through a RFP process when sufficient funds are available for a feasible development project). Also, as part of the process of developing the Annual Plan, HUD requires input from the community regarding housing needs and housing programs for the Housing Authority to consider when approving housing programs and projects. The HOME planning and budgeting process is currently underway and the FY 2022-2023 Affordable Housing Budget will be brought to the Housing Authority for review in June 2022. In addition to HOME funds, the Affordable Housing Budget also includes Section 14 of 117
13 1
3 3
5 6
8 Rental Assistance, federal CoC homeless funds, BEGIN Homeownership Program, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund expenditures, Measure S funding for the Monthly Housing Subsidy Program, and program income from Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

The funding plan for the use of HOME funds will be determined by the Housing Authority as part of the Housing Authority’s review and approval of the annual Affordable Housing Budget, with consideration given to input received regarding housing needs as part of the CDBG, ESG and HOME Annual Plan community needs assessment process.

The HOME program is one of four major housing resources addressed in the City’s 2020- 2025 Consolidated Plan. The table below shows the four major funding sources and two additional funding sources, estimated FY2022-2023 revenues from each, and percentage of total revenues for each.

Estimated Affordable Housing Revenue FY2022-2023
Funding Source Estimated
Revenue
Percent of
Total Revenue
HOME Investment Program $1,699,832 2.8%
Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds $300,000 0.5%
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program $50,020,290 83.4% Affordable Housing Trust Fund $73,050 0.12%
BEGIN Homeownership Program $10,000 0.02%
Monthly Housing Subsidy Program $5,126,677 8.55%
CoC Homeless Competitive Funding $2,741,171 4.6%
TOTAL FUNDS $59,971,020 100%
Generally, the budget allocates the majority of HOME funds for use in projects and programs that increase affordable housing opportunities and supply. Based on the current housing market, the greatest opportunity for increasing the affordable housing supply in the next year is through the Affordable Rental – New Construction and Acquisition/Rehabilitation Program. HOME funds are restrictive in that they can only be used for lower income households. Other HOME fund requirements typically include: a 25% match by developers; a reserve of 15% for a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO); federal prevailing wages for larger housing projects; a commitment of funds to a specific project within 24 months (temporarily suspended); and a requirement for expenditure of funds within five years. 15 of 117
14 1
3 3
5 6
The entitlement amount for HOME funds in FY 2022-2023 is $1,569,833 which is an increase of $160,092 from the FY 2021-2022 grant amount. In addition, $129,999 is also available from HOME program income for FY 2022-2023 HOME projects. HOME funds from FY2022-2023 and prior years represent the majority of funds that will be available in FY2022-2023 for new construction of affordable housing units. Therefore, it is recommended that the funding strategies for the HOME program in FY 2022-2023 include:
900 E Broadway $1,800,000 920 E Broadway $1,800,000 515 Pioneer $2,000,000 It is also recommended to appropriate $156,983 for administration to pay for costs associated with planning, reporting, project development, and compliance monitoring of HOME projects. This amount is equal to 10% of the 2022 HOME entitlement amount.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
PUBLIC COMMENT:

HUD requires the City to publish a notice regarding CDBG, ESG and HOME funding recommendations in the newspaper, and conduct a public hearing to receive public comments. The CDBG Advisory Committee directed staff to look into additional ways to get resident comments. This year outreach efforts included an in-person meeting at Pacific Community Center on Wednesday, April 13, 2022, a virtual Public Hearing scheduled on Thursday, April 14, 2022 via Microsoft Teams as well as an option to send public comments by way of mail, email, or telephone call between March 17, 2022 to April 15, 2022.

On March 17, 2021, the City posted a public notice on the City’s webpage, social media, and in the Community Services & Parks Department (CSP) Newsletter informing residents of a public comment period of March 17, 2022 to April 15, 2022. Furthermore, on March 17, 2021 the same notice was published in the Glendale Independent.

Reminder e-mails were sent out to CSP contact lists, community non-profits, HOAs, and posted on social media two to three days before the virtual meeting.

Three (3) residents attended the in-person Public Hearing and nine (9) attended the virtual meeting. No mail, emails or telephone calls were received. All comments via in- person and Microsoft Teams meetings were received and recorded in Exhibit 4.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, HOME Annual Action Plan is based on a $3,529,800 budget, which was included as a part of the FY 2022-2023 proposed budget as follows:

Amount Funding Source
$1,798,404 CDBG Fund
$ 161,563 Emergency Solutions Grant Fund
$1,569,833 Home Grant Fund
16 of 117
15 1
3 3
5 6

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Community Development Department, after conducting an Initial Study, prepared a Negative Declaration for the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan that was circulated for a 20-day public review period from April 21, 2022 to May 11, 2022. No comments were received. (See Exhibit 5)
Staff is requesting the City Council pass a Resolution adopting the Final Negative Declaration (attached to this report as Exhibit 5) for the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan.

If the Council and the Authority approve the Annual Action Plan and if the Council approves the Resolution adopting the Final Negative Declaration, staff will place a 30-day notice in the newspaper informing the public that the approved Plans are available for study and comment, as well providing any other notices required under CEQA, such as the notice of determination. The Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD and implementation of the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs will commence on July 1, 2022.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 6, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
City Council:

Alternative 1: Approve 1) a Resolution Adopting the Final Negative Declaration for the project; and 2) a Motion approving and authorizing submission of the FY 2022-23 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee (modified by staff), and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and authorizing the City Manager, or a designee to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee Approval.

Alternative 2: Do not approve the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan.

Alternative 3: Any other alternative not proposed by staff.

Housing Authority:

Alternative 1: Approve a Motion approving and authorizing submission of the FY 2022-23 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800; and authorizing submission of the Annual Action Plan to 17 of 117
16 1
3 3
5 6
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee (modified by staff), and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board.

Alternative 2: Do not approve the FY 2022-23 CDBG, ESG and HOME Annual Action Plan.

Alternative 3: Any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Arsine Isayan, Senior Administrative Analyst
Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor
Pamela Jackson, Housing Coordinator
Tereza Aleksanian, Deputy Director of Community Services & Parks Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. FY 2022-2023 Proposed CDBG Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category

2. Proposed FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan for CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs

3. Summary List of FY 2022-2023 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations

4. Summary of Public Hearing and Public Comments

5. Negative Declaration

6. Campaign Finance Disclosures

7. FY 2022-23 ESG Funding Allocation
18 of 117
EXHIBIT 1
FY 2022-2023 PROPOSED CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATION PLAN BY FUNDING CATEGORY

FY 20-21
Final HUD
Allocation
FY 21-22
Final HUD
Allocation
FY 22-23
Proposed HUD
Allocation
$1,997,476 $1,921,981 $1,731,797
HUD ENTITLEMENT: $1,997,476 $1,921,981 $0
CURRENT YEAR CDBG PROGRAM INCOME $0 $0 $0
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE $66,607
REPROGRAMMED FUNDS* $219,004
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES:

ADMINISTRATION (20% of Entitlement): $399,495 $378,818 $346,359 (planning, program management and oversight)
PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES (15% of Entitlement): $299,621 $288,297 $259,770 Reprogrammed Funds: $219,004
COMMUNITY PROJECTS: (100%)
•Loaves and Fishes Homeless Prevention Program-Catholic Charities $68,481 $41,409 $25,977 •Intergenerational Experiences-ACA Hamazkayin $33,000 $15,299 $0 •Youth Development Through Scouting-Boy Scouts of America Verdugo Hills Council $22,000 $10,299 $0 •Housing Support-Family Promise of the Verdugos $11,000 $10,299 $10,977 •Afterschool Program for Homeless Women & Children-Door of Hope $28,880 $20,299 $25,977 •Fair Housing Program-Housing Rights Center $10,000 $10,299 $10,000 •Community Outreach Project-Armenian Relief Society $105,000 $50,299 $50,977 •Youth Employment Program-Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) $37,000 $25,299 $20,977 •Intervention/Prevention Group Counseling Program-CASPS $48,000 $30,299 $30,977 •AESA STEM Academy-Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America $10,299 $0 •Homeless Outreach Case Management-Ascencia $0 $18,598 $20,977 •People's Choice Food Pantry-Salvation Army $40,000 $20,977 •Pro Bono Legal Clinic-Armenian Bar Association $15,977 •Mental Health Services for Survivors of DV-YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $25,977 •The Zone After School Program-Salvation Army $25,643
•Fire Burn Prevention Education-Children's Burn Foundation (Canceled) $15,000 $0 •Afterschool Program-Armenian Cultural Foundation $74,621 $35,299 •Food for Thought Food Pantry-Glendale College Foundation $10,299 Public Social Services Sub-total $518,625 $288,296 $259,770 CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: $1,298,360 $1,254,866 $1,192,275 PRE-DESIGNATED PROJECTS: $981,101 $400,000 $225,667
•FY22-23 Fremont Park Renovation Project $225,667
•FY21-22 Pacific Park Splash Pad Project $400,000
•Pelanconi Park Project $494,966
•Section 108 Loan Payment to HUD Ascencia Emergency Shelter Project $486,135 UN-DESIGNATED COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $317,259 $854,867 $966,607 •FY22/23 First Floor All-Inclusive Locker Room Project-YMCA of Glendale $334,491 $179,000 •CDBG Repiping Project-Ascencia $31,840
•Hamilton House Renovation Project-The Campbell Center $377,884 •YWCA Lexington Campus CIP-YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $377,884 •Glendale Youth Center CIP Project-Armenian Cultural Center $116,000 •Restroom Renovation Project at Main Campus-Homenetmen Ararat Chapter $206,518 •Alma House CIP-The Campbell Center $197,858
•Roofing Glendale Community Center Improvement Project-Catholic Charities $123,989 •Roofing Project at Main Campus-Homenetmen Ararat Chapter $193,270 FY PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: $1,997,476 $1,921,981 $1,798,404 Balance $0 $0 $0
Uncommitted FY 2016-2019 Grant funds $18,943 $66,607
19 of 117
1 EXHIBIT 2
PROPOSED FY 2022-2023

ACTION PLAN FOR

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT,

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT AND HOME PROGRAMS
I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

PROJECT/AGENCY FUNDING

PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES

RECOMMENDED
COMMUNITY PROGRAMS:

ABA Pro Bono Legal Services $15,977
Armenian Bar Association
Armenian Bar Association (ABA) is requesting $48,840 to provide pro bono legal services to low and moderate income individuals living in Glendale. One-to-one counseling services are provided at the Adult Recreation Center at 201 E Colorado, Glendale, CA 91205 with a goal of bridging the language and finance gap that limits the client’s ability to access justice. ABA Services include: housing rights, employment rights, criminal justice reform/rehabilitation (expungement clinics), senior services benefits, child custody matters, family law, domestic violence program, government benefits related to COVID protections. ABA does not have formal offices and uses a P.O. Box 29111, Los Angeles, CA 90029 for correspondence. Number Served: 35 unduplicated Glendale residents
Intergenerational Experiences $0
Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin
Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin is requesting $71,498 to provide afterschool and online arts, music, theater, and dance classes for students of all ages, special needs and low income Glendale families. 32 classes are proposed to be conducted for the program year in singing/choir, theater/workshops, dance painting/drawing, design, sewing, artifacts, and embroidery to 65 unduplicated students. Classes are scheduled to be held at 407 East Colorado, Glendale, CA 91205 and current classes are being offered via Zoom as well. Hamazkayin is seeking funds to pay for instructors and operating cost for rent. Number Served: 65 unduplicated students.

AESA STEM Academy $0
Armenian Engineers & Scientists of America
20 of 117
2 Armenian Engineers & Scientists of America (AESA) is requesting $19,405 to provide two (2) programs: Robotics and Science Olympiad program to low and moderate income students of Middle school through High School age with the opportunity to learn STEM education and mentoring, through science fairs and competitions. The programs are proposed to be conducted at various locations. AESA address is 1436 W.

Glenoaks Blvd. Unit 287, Glendale, CA 91201. Robotics Program is an 8-week program for 6th-8th graders. 15 unduplicated students per session will learn STEM scientific, critical thinking, engineering discipline, and teamwork. Science Olympiad is organized for 6th-12th graders providing interscholastic academic competition which provides mentorship, workshops prior to the event. 25 unduplicated students will be served by the Science Olympiad. Number Served: A total of 40 students will be served by the two programs.

Community Outreach Program
$50,977
Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, Inc.

Armenian Relief Society (ARS) is requesting $95,707 to continue to provide the Community Outreach Program to low-moderate income individuals, adults, disabled adults, and seniors impacted by COVID-19. Service delivery activities include: ESL and Life Skills Classes for 100 seniors, 100 individuals to receive Job Search Assistance, Employment, and Placement, and 100 disabled adults to receive case management, benefits enrollment, and other social services. Target population includes Glendale residents with limited English language proficiency. Community Outreach Program is an existing program with services offered and conducted throughout the year. ARS services and classes are held at 517 West Glenoaks Blvd, Glendale, CA 91202. Number Served: 300 unduplicated clients.

Homeless Outreach Program $20,977
Ascencia
Ascencia is requesting $36,845 in CDBG funding for the existing Homeless Outreach Program to outreach and engage homeless people in Glendale and adjacent areas where they sometimes stay and connect them to services. Ascencia’s Homeless Outreach Program is located at 1851 Tyburn Street. Case Managers distribute essential provisions such as food, water, and warm clothing to homeless persons on the streets. Case Managers also connect homeless persons including veterans, to health and mental health services, provide transportation to appointments and assist in obtaining identification and birth certificates. The goal of the program is to build relationships with long time “service resistant” chronically homeless persons, share information and resources about the program services and provide onsite case management. The team engages homeless people on the streets of Glendale and connects clients to services with the goal of ultimately moving clients into permanent housing. Number Served: 60 unduplicated homeless individuals.

Creating Mental Resiliency In Youth While Increasing Diversity and Equity $0 21 of 117
3 Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts
The Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts of America is requesting $30,000 for Creating Mental Resiliency in Youth While Increasing Diversity and Equity Program which is designed to develop character, build leadership skills, promote citizenship, and personal/mental/emotional fitness in Glendale youth. Program runs afterschool and includes Camp activities for free or reduced cost. Services include: registration assistance, uniform, materials, and campership funding. The program emphasis is on increasing the diversity of socio-economic, gender, ethnic and disabilities/abilities of youth participants. Boy Scout offices are located at 1325 Grandview Avenue, Glendale, CA 91021. Number Served: 75 unduplicated students.

Glendale Loaves & Fishes Program $25,977
Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc.

Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc is requesting $89,333 to fund an existing homeless prevention program. The program provides case management, referrals, advocacy, and social supportive services to primarily low income, non or limited English speaking immigrant individuals and families who are at imminent risk of becoming homeless. These families are in poverty and many receive public assistance. The Program is offered at the Glendale Community Center located at 4322 San Fernando Road, Glendale CA 91204. The program proposes to provide homeless prevention services to address food insecurity, offer case management, and supportive services.

Services will include: assisting households with food pantry, immigration/refugee services, job search assistance, languages assistance, life skills training and workshops, nutrition information/care, health care access, and citizenship preparation classes. Number Served: 70 unduplicated clients.

Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling Program $30,977 Committee for Armenian Students in Public Schools
CASPS is an existing program which is requesting $65,690 in funding to administer the Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling Program for K-6 elementary students at four (4) Glendale GUSD schools (Columbus, Muir, Mann, and Keppel).

CASPS will operate the program for 100 “at-risk” unduplicated students who face academic, behavioral, and /or social skill issues at the 4 GUSD locations. The program aims to serve 25 students at each school. The overall goal of the program is to provide 3 ten week sessions of counseling which include Play Therapy and Expressive Therapy to help with self-awareness, improve self-esteem and motivation. The program is conducted by an experienced licensed Clinical Psychologist and professional in the field of counseling. CASPS administrative offices are located at 6252 Honolulu Ave, La Crescenta, 91214. Target population is chosen by a team of GUSD principals, administrators and teachers who make a recommendation for services to GUSD students and their families. Number Served: 100 unduplicated clients/students.

Door of Hope Domestic Violence Services
$25,977
Door of Hope
22 of 117
4 Door of Hope(DOH) is requesting $100,000 to continue to provide existing services for Transitional Housing, Case Management, and Mental Health to adults and children fleeing domestic violence. The project will provide onsite therapy services to 22 adult residents and 10 youth; and case management services to all adult residents, and to shelter these families at the undisclosed location. Service Activities include: mental health, case management, shelter, food assistance, financial literacy, life skills, children/youth services, and homeless prevention and permanent housing assistance.

The site of the services is called Hamilton Court and is at an undisclosed location due to the nature of the services. Number Served: 22 unduplicated adults and 10 unduplicated youth.

Crisis Housing Support $10,977
Family Promise of the Verdugos
Family Promise of the Verdugos is requesting $30,000 in CDBG funding for the existing Crisis Housing Support program focusing on aiding the Glendale homeless population by conducting assessments and intakes to expedite the housing placement process.

Services include: aid in attaining housing for homeless families, expediting the assessment/intake process for homeless families entering shelter/rapid-rehousing programs, resources to partner agencies, and speaking to and educating landlords about Family Promise programs to confidently rent out to homeless families. Family Promise of the Verdugos program is operated out of 134 North Kenwood, 4th floor, Glendale, CA 91206. Number Served: 50 unduplicated households to be served by the program.

Youth Employment Program $20,977
Glendale Youth Alliance
Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) is requesting $60,000 to continue to operate the Youth Employment Program. The Program consists of two youth mentorship programs:

Glendale Youth Employment Partnership (GYEP) and Glendale Resource for Employment and Training (GREAT). GYA proposes to provide employment training and mentored work experience to 50-60 at risk youth ages 14-24 annually. These program are operated continuously during the summer month and during the school year. GYA provides the youth with pre-employment training skills, employment skills, communication skills, work experience, supportive services, and case management, GYA operates out of the Verdugo Jobs Center, located at 1255 South Central Ave, in Glendale. Number Served: 50-60 unduplicated Youth.

Fair Housing Program $10,000
Housing Rights Center
The Housing Rights Center (HRC) is requesting $20,300 in CDBG funds to continue providing fair housing and landlord/tenant services to 500 Glendale residents with filing fair housing complaints. HRC provides services in four main areas: 1) Discrimination Complaint Investigation, 2) Landlord/Tenant Counseling, 3) Education and Outreach, and 4) Fair Housing Legal Services. HRC will conduct 3 fair housing workshops for 23 of 117
5 Glendale tenants and property owners/managers per year. HRC collaborates with local agencies to provide multi-lingual outreach, education programs, and workshops in Armenian, Cantonese, Korean, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish. Services are targeted primarily to low and moderate income individuals of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. HRC offices are located at 3255 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1150 in Los Angeles. HRC points out that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requires jurisdictions that receive CDBG funding to affirmatively further fair housing, and HRC has been working in partnership with the City to help fulfill this requirement through CDBG and Community Development Department’s Housing Division. Number Served: 500 unduplicated Glendale residents to include 10 Glendale households with filing fair housing complaints.

People’s Choice Market Food Pantry
$20,977
Salvation Army
Salvation Army is requesting $50,000 to operate the existing People’s Choice Market Food Pantry, a monthly community food pantry in existence for over 30 years which helps families and individuals from extremely low and low to moderate households gain access to food nutrition. The objective of the program is to respond to food insecurity in the most vulnerable households by providing free groceries and other essential items.

Funding for the program will allow the purchase of food and personnel support for the Food Pantry located at 801 S. Central Ave, Glendale, CA 91204. The Program is open Monday-Thursday from 12 noon to 3 pm. Number Served: 500 unduplicated households.

Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence $25,977
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena (YWCA) is requesting $54,452 to provide an existing Clinical Program, although new to CDBG program which offers no cost, trauma informed individuals and group therapy to victims of domestic violence and their children who have experienced trauma. Services are available Monday through Friday from 9:00am to 6:00pm. Counseling is provided by licensed marriage and family therapist and social workers in sessions at both the emergency shelter and business center by way of short term therapy (15 sessions) and group session therapy (12-week session). Services are located at 735 East Lexington Drive, Glendale, CA 91202 and at the undisclosed Sunrise Village Emergency Shelter. Number Served: Agency did not specify total number of unduplicated person expected to be served by the program annually.

TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES REQUEST $772,070
TOTAL CDBG FUNDS AVAILABLE $259,770
DIFFERENCE $512,300
24 of 117
6 CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COMMUNITY AGENCIES:

CDBG Re-piping Project $31,840
Ascencia
Ascencia is requesting $31,840 for the replacement and re-piping of all rough plumbing which includes all water supply and drain pipes. Re-piping hot and cold pipes with approved transitional fitting and chlorinated polyvinyl chloride pipes, which is recommended for commercial and industrial applications to withstand higher temperatures. Scope of Work includes re-routing of condensation lines for the air conditioning unit to discharge to a proper location, the installation of a new recirculation pump and timer, and re-piping of all horizontal and vertical pipes to prevent rusting and aging. Ascencia Access Center located at 1951 Tyburn Street in Glendale was adapted from masonry constructed warehouse building in 1983 and the current structure is 11,500 sq. ft., housing office space for services and administration and a 45- bed shelter for homeless families and individuals. Amenities include: a commercial kitchen, accessible showers (upstairs/downstairs), laundry room, conference room and dining room. Number Served: 915 unduplicated homeless individuals annually.

Hamilton House Renovation Project
$37,883.50
The Campbell Center
The Campbell Center is resubmitting the Hamilton House Renovation project which was submitted last year but not approved. Campbell Center is requesting $574,918 for the renovation of the Hamilton House, which includes the following throughout: new roof (both house and garage), replace 24 windows and 1 patio sliding door, bathroom 1 and 3 full remodel, bathroom 2 (ADA remodel), laundry room remodel, kitchen remodel (installation of kitchen cabinets, countertops, sink, ADA, and plumbing), replace 2-40 gallon water heaters, front unit anchor bolting, knee bracing, earthquake retrofitting gas-shut off valves, electrical rewiring (phone/cable wiring); replace one 5 ton AC unit, exterior door replacement throughout, lead/asbestos abatement, paint interior/exterior of house and garage, refinish/repair hardwood flooring, install vinyl tile garage flooring, build water retention pit, install gutters and downspouts, replace driveway and walkway concrete, and refinish front porch/deck. Hamilton House is a 5 bedroom, 3 bathrooms, one-story residential home of 2,808 sq. ft. built in 1959 and is located at 739 West Glenoaks Boulevard, Glendale, CA 91202, a licensed group home which provides permanent supportive housing to residents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Hamilton House was originally 2 buildings on the same lot, a front unit and rear unit which have since been connected. Hamilton House serves 10 unduplicated extremely low income adults ages 21-72 with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Due to the age of the building and deferred maintenance, priority repairs must be completed to preserve home functionality, fulfill ADA standards, and meet 25 of 117
7 electrical codes, earthquake retrofitting standards, prevent injury, and accommodate current and future residents with mobility challenges.

FY 2022-23 First Floor All-Inclusive Locker Room Project $179,000
YMCA of Glendale
The YMCA of Glendale is currently funded $399,495 in FY2021-2022 and is returning to request additional funding of $179,000 for the same project. The First Floor All- Inclusive Locker Room project is the conversion of the girl’s/boys locker room into a large family locker room on the first floor that proposes to provide accessibility and be inclusive. The scope of work includes: 11 individually enclosed private showers with a flip bench, full height doors, and hardware. Six (6) new sinks which include 1 ADA sink on a new counter with new plumbing fixtures. The co-ed locker room will have 2 new family changing ADA restrooms equipped with sink, shower, toilet, flip bench, and changing stations. Additions include individual enclosed private toilet compartments, tile, carpet flooring, and proper drainage throughout. New Gypsum Board ceiling, lighting and mechanical diffuser will be provided. The coed locker room will have new benches, lockers, shelf and mirror for patron’s use, a new storage and all exposed wall and columns are to be enclosed and painted. The YMCA is a 55,000 sq. ft. facility built in 1977 and located at 140 North Louise St, Glendale, CA 91206, offering numerous programs designed for health and fitness. The YMCA proposes to serve 800 unduplicated adults, seniors, and family members including special needs adults ages 18-22. The conversion will allow patrons who would normally use the women’s second floor locker room or the men’s basement floor locker room which can only be accessed by elevator to be able to have a first floor accessibly for all. YMCA of Glendale provides additional public social services to include: clothing, food, and access to resources for employment and housing. Number Served: 800 unduplicated patrons YWCA Lexington Campus CIP
$377,883.50
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena
The YWCA Glendale and Pasadena is requesting $732,128 for YWCA Lexington Campus Capital Improvement Project. YWCA’s proposed project includes making upgrades and make improvements to Building #1 which is the original building constructed in 1939 and consists of approximately 13,880 SF in two stories plus basement. The building is used as office space on both first and second floors and features a 2,500 SF multi-purpose auditorium with vaulted roof and raised stage platform on the first floor. Facility Improvements include: Structural, Architectural, Accessibility, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing upgrades throughout; first floor accessibility upgrades to toilets and ramps; seismic improvements, exterior facade repair/preservation. Scope of Work for the Building #1 is as follows: Replacement of basement electrical room equipment; replacement of the first floor regency room ceiling tiles, insulation in roof framing; replacement of first floor women’s/men’s restrooms converted to accessible men-only, replacement of first floor corridor by removing and 26 of 117
8 replacing the wood frames and doors with accessible ramp, plywood sheathing, extend corridor finishes, first floor office and store room contiguous to stairway to main entry to be converted to accessible women-only restroom; Title 24 energy improvement in Building #1; Exterior façade repair, protection/preservation and painting of Building #1.

The YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena building is located at 735 E. Lexington Drive, Glendale Ca. Number Served: The project serves 2,135 unduplicated persons/households annually through four programs and services.

SUBTOTAL COMMUNITY AGENCIES $1,398,186
TOTAL CAPITAL RFP FUNDS AVAILABLE $
966,607
DIFFERENCE $ 431,579
CITY DEPARTMENTS:

Fremont Park Renovation Project $225,667
Community Services & Parks
Fremont Park, approximately 7.9 acres in size, is nestled between the Glenwood and Vineyard Neighborhoods south of Glenoaks Boulevard and west of Pacific Avenue. It is one of the oldest neighborhood parks in the City of Glendale (City) and has numerous heavily used amenities including: 8 tennis courts, children’s play equipment, a wading pool, a basketball half-court, a sand volleyball court, open fields, a rose garden and numerous picnic areas clustered under the park’s mature trees. Fremont Park is extensively used for both active and passive recreation. Picnic areas are frequently used by patrons on weekdays and weekends. The children’s play area is heavily used daily. The wading pool is reserved on weekends extensively during the summer. The basketball half-court is used throughout the day for pick-up games by multiple age groups. In addition, the open field areas are regularly used for soccer games. The project plans include the following new or renovated features and amenities:

Community Building, Artificial Turf Multi-Purpose Field, Splash Pad, Picnic Pavilions, Picnic Tables and Barbecues, Public Art Display Areas, Benches, Drinking Fountains, 35 Parking Spaces, Pickleball Courts, Drive/Walking Path, Tennis Shade Structure and Benches, Children’s Playground, Lighting, Irrigation, Half Basketball Court, Planting (drought tolerant), Restroom Structure, Picnic Tables, Natural Grass Turf. The construction documents also include the relocation and reconstruction of four tennis courts, and renovation of the maintenance building / garage. The Model Train Society building will remain in-place and the exterior will be repainted. $400,000 will help to close funding gaps to the current $17.7-million-dollar project.

SUBTOTAL $225,667
TOTAL CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT $225,667
27 of 117
9 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $225,667
DIFFERENCE $0

ADMINISTRATION
Administration of Community Development Block Grant Program $346,359
TOTAL CDBG FUNDS AVAILABLE: $1,731,797
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: $ 66,607
$1,798,404
II. EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) PROGRAM
Emergency Housing Program $43,372
Ascencia
Ascencia is requesting $43,372 in ESG funding for operations of its existing 45-bed year-round Emergency Housing Program for homeless families and individuals. The program is proposing to serve 180 unduplicated clients with the length of stay ranging from 90 to 120 days. Ascencia is located at 1851 Tyburn Street in Glendale; it is the only year-round homeless shelter in the City of Glendale. It is also one of the few shelters in Los Angeles County that accepts families and individuals, including families with teenage children, single fathers, and pregnant women. Ascencia uses a client- centered “whatever it takes” approach to ensure that clients remain stably housed whether participate in rapid re-housing or other options. This approach unfolds in a five- stage process: 1) outreach and engagement; 2) assessment; 3) short-term case management to address immediate needs; 4) housing search and placement; and 5) post-placement services to help clients integrate into the new neighborhood and achieve stability. Ascencia’s Access Center which serves as Glendale’s Coordinates Entry System will leverage screening, assessment, and case management services.

This may include medical and/or mental health treatment, money management, employment assistance, substance abuse treatment, parenting training, benefits advocacy, family law assistance, transportation planning, and life skills. Ascencia’s three-person outreach team aid in building rapport with clients and acting as initial contact and conducts preliminary needs assessments. Ascencia works closely with first responders, including Glendale police, the fire department, and hospital emergency rooms, to initiate services for people who are homeless. Ascencia actively participates in a variety of coalitions, as well as public and private meetings such as Glendale Domestic Violence Task Force, Glendale healthier Community Coalition, Verdugo job Center Management Collaborative, etc.

Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program – ESG $36,637 Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc.
28 of 117
10 Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. shall receive $36,637 in ESG funding to provide financial assistance to 50 households in the Glendale area. The Loaves and Fishes Homeless Prevention Program provides case management and social services to poor and low-income individuals and families who are at imminent risk of becoming homeless. These families live primarily at poverty and low-income levels, with most receiving public assistance and free or reduced price school meals for children. Many are non or limited English speaking immigrant families who have come to Los Angeles from various South and Central American, Middle Eastern and Asian countries; most are first or second generation immigrants. A large portion of the clients seeking help reside in the 91204 and 91205 zip codes, the area immediately surrounding the Glendale Community Center. The program provides case management services in addition to financial assistance to individuals and families meeting the following criteria:
a) have received an eviction notice or Notice of Termination of utilities services; b) need security deposit or a portion of rent for an individual/family who is at-risk of homelessness to move into his/her own apartment; c) need mediation or advocacy with the landlord or the utility company; and d) need case management and follow-up supportive services to prevent homelessness. Of the $36,637 being requested, $35,037 will be used for direct assistance and the remaining $1,600 will be used for administrative costs.

Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency Shelter Program
$75,300
YWCA of Glendale
The YWCA of Glendale is requesting $75,300 for the ongoing operation of their Sunrise Village Emergency Shelter and to provide rapid rehousing/homelessness prevention services for women and their children who have become homeless as a result of domestic violence. The YWCA proposes to serve a minimum of 100 unduplicated households for FY 22-23. Access to the emergency shelter is through the emergency shelter 24-hour hotline and drop-in center. Services are designed to help domestic violence victims and survivors achieve and maintain safety during and after their 45-90- day stay in the emergency shelter. Clients are provided with support that includes survivor-driven housing advocacy, housing stability, community engagement and financial literacy. Clients are provided with food, clothing, emergency transportation, case management, counseling, information and referrals, and advocacy. In addition, Sunrise Village provides multiple activities and scheduled programs for women and their children, including parenting classes, individual and family counseling. The goal of the DV Housing and Emergency Shelter Program is to provide services to empower women and their children.

Administration of ESG PROGRAM $6,254
Community Services and Parks
TOTAL ESG PROGRAM $161,563
TOTAL ESG FUNDS AVAILABLE $161,563
DIFFERENCE $0
29 of 117
11 III. HOME PROGRAM
Citrus Crossing
900 E Broadway $1,800,000
Citrus Crossing, located at 900 E. Broadway, is a 127-unit, 100% affordable, rental project for seniors age 62 and up. The Glendale Housing Authority is partnering with Meta Housing, providing a total of $15 million in subsidies to develop the project, which will consist of 87 studios and 39 one-bedroom apartments in a five-story structure above two levels of subterranean parking with 92 parking stalls. An additional two- bedroom unit will serve as the resident manager’s unit. 11 units will utilize HOME funding.

The apartments will be reserved for seniors earning between 30% and 80% of area median income (extremely low to low income) for a minimum of 72 years. With all financing and approvals in place, this $60M project is set to break ground on March 1, 2022. The project is expected to complete construction no later than September, 2024 Harrower Village
920 E Broadway $1,800,000
Harrower Village, located at 920 E. Broadway. Is a 40-unit, 100% affordable rental project for seniors age 62 and up. The Glendale Housing Authority is partnering with Abode Housing, providing $9.5 million in subsidies to develop the project, which will consists of 14 studios and 25 1-bedroom apartments, along with a single two-bedroom apartment for the resident manager. 11 units will utilize HOME funding.

The project is an adaptive re-use and historic preservation of the historic Harrower Labs complex, more recently occupied by Tobinworld, who vacated the site in late 2019. Parking for the project will be provided at the adjacent, affordable housing project at 900 E. Broadway. Between the two projects, the existing alley will be converted to a pedestrian paseo which will be accessible to the public during daylight hours. The apartments will be reserved for seniors earning between 30% and 60% area median income (extremely low to low income) for a minimum of 55 years. The project design and financing has been approved and will submit for building plan check no later than April 2022. The $27 million project is expected to break ground in June, 2022 and complete construction no later than Hune 30, 2024.

The apartments will be reserved for seniors earning between 30% and 80% of area median income (extremely low to low income) for a minimum of 75 years. With all financing and approvals in place, this $60M project is set to break ground on March 1, 2022. The project is expected to complete construction no later than September, 2024 515 Pioneer Drive $2,000,000
515 Pioneer Drive is a 2.8 acre site acquired by the Housing Authority in the Fall of 2019. The Housing Authority selected Linc Housing and National CORE as development partners to develop 340 units of affordable rental housing for seniors and small families in a two to five story, new construction development above a two-level 30 of 117
12 subterranean parking structure with 342 parking stalls. The unit mix includes 32 studios, 260 one-bedroom units and 48 two-bedroom units which will be reserved for seniors and small families earning between 30% and 80% area median income (extremely low and low income). The apartments will be affordable for no less than 55 years. The Housing Authority is providing $23 million to assist funding this $145 million project. 11 units will utilize HOME funding. Linc Housing and National CORE are currently pursuing building permits concurrent with applications for additional public financing. If financing is secured in this application round, ground breaking could commence as early as October, 2022.

Administration of HOME Program
$156,983

TOTAL HOME FUNDS AVAILABLE
$5,773,983
31 of 117
EXHIBIT 3

AGENCY PROGRAM
FY 22-23
Requested
Funding
FY 22-23
Recommended
Funding
based on
Estimated
Allocation
FY 22-23
Recommended
Funding
based on
Final HUD
Allocation Difference
1 Armenian Bar Association Pro Bono Legal Services $48,840.00 $20,000.00 $15,977.00 ($32,863.00) 2 Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin Intergenerational Experiences $71,498.00 $0.00 ($71,498.00) 3 Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America AESA STEM Academy $19,405.00 $0.00 ($19,405.00) 4 Armenian Relief Society Community Outreach Program $95,707.00 $55,000.00 $50,977.00 ($44,730.00) 5 Ascencia Homeless Outreach Program $36,845.00 $25,000.00 $20,977.00 ($15,868.00) 6 Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. Glendale Community Center Loaves & Fishes Program $89,333.00 $30,000.00 $25,977.00 ($63,356.00) 7 Committee for Armenian Students in Public SchoolsIntervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling $65,690.00 $35,000.00 $30,977.00 ($34,713.00) 8 Door of Hope Door of Hope Domestic Violence Services $100,000.00 $30,000.00 $25,977.00 ($74,023.00) 9 Family Promise of the Verdugos Crisis Housing Support $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,977.00 ($19,023.00) 10 Glendale Youth Alliance Youth Employment Program $60,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,977.00 ($39,023.00) 11 Housing Rights Center Fair Housing Program $20,300.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 ($10,300.00) 12 Salvation Army People's Choice Market Food Pantry $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,977.00 ($29,023.00) 13 Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts Creating Resiliency in Youth While Increasing Diversity and Equity $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($30,000.00) 14 YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence $54,452.00 $30,000.00 $25,977.00 $772,070.00 $300,000.00 $259,770.00
$300,000.00 $300,000.00 $259,770.00
($472,070.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES

FUNDS AVAILABLE

DEFICIT/SURPLUS
Summary List of FY 2022-2023 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended For Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations

PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES
32 of 117
EXHIBIT 3

PROGRAM
FY 22-23

REQUESTED

FUNDING
FY 22-23
Recommended
Funding Based On
Estimated Allocation
FY 22-23
CDBG Advisory
Committee
Recommended
Funding Based
On HUD Final
Allocation
FY 22-23 Staff
Recommended
Funding Based On
HUD Final
Allocation
Difference
PRE-APPROVED CITY PROJECTS:

Fremont Park Renovation Project 22/23 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $225,667.00 ($174,333.00) SUB-TOTAL $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $225,667.00 ($174,333.00) COMMUNITY PROJECTS:
1 Ascencia-CDBG Repiping Project $31,840.00 $31,840.00 $31,840.00 $31,840.00 $0.00 2 YMCA of Glendale-FY22-23 First Floor All Inclusive Locker Room Project $179,000.00 $179,000.00 $179,000.00 $179,000.00 $0.00 3 The Campbell Center, Hamilton House Renovation Project $574,918.00 $377,883.50 $290,717.50 $377,883.50 ($197,034.50) 4 YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena, Lexington Campus CIP Project $612,428.00 $377,883.50 $290,717.50 $377,883.50($234,544.50) REQUESTED SUB-TOTAL $1,398,186.00 $966,607.00 $792,275.00 $966,607.00 TOTAL REQUESTED ( CITY/COMMUNITY) $1,798,186.00 $1,366,607.00 $1,192,274.00 $1,192,274.00 DIFFERENCE ($431,579.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
GRAND TOTAL AVAILABLE COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $966,607.00 $966,607.00 $792,275.00 $966,607.00 GRAND TOTAL AVAILABLE CITY/COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $1,366,607.00 $1,366,607.00 $1,192,275.00 $1,192,275.00 Summary List of FY 2022-2023 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended For Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations Total Funding for FY2022-2023 includes CDBG Funding Allocation of $1,125,668 + $66,607 in CDBG unappropriated fund balance from previous years.(Totaling $1,192,274)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
33 of 117
Exhibit 4

1 Summary of Public Hearing and Public Comments
Regarding the City of Glendale’s
Proposed FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan for
CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs

Public Hearing, April 13, 2022, Pacific Community Center, 501 S. Pacific Avenue:

The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:15 p.m.

Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor opened the public hearing for the FY 2022-2023 Annual Plan and introduced dignitaries and city staff in attendance. Tereza Aleksanian, Arsineh Isayan, Pamela Jackson, and Erik Adamyan helped to present during the meeting.

City staff provided a Power Point presentation which included: purpose of the meeting, a flowchart of the CDBG Annual Program Planning Process FY2022 -2023; CDBG funding allocation plan, and the proposed FY2022 -2023 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant, and HOME Programs; and encouraged public comment.

During t he presentations, attendees were provided in depth review of the Program Planning Process Chart, each month’s process and highlights of the steps in the process to conduct the public hearing to review and obtain comments from the public regarding the propo sed funding recommendations for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs.

Ms. Kavarian stated that the funding recommendations will be submitted to the City Council for final approval on May 24, 2022 . She mentioned that, final funding recommendatio ns are still pending and a Contingency Plan is in place to finalize the allocations to each program and project.

Mr. Adamyan presented the Proposal Evaluation Process to the attendees and explained how City Staff receive, evaluate, and prepare the propo sals for CDBG Advisory Board review. He explained highlights of the CDBG Advisory Board Meeting on March 4, 2022 and March 7, 2022 and the deliberation and decision making process for the Board.

Ms. Isayan explained the ESG program process and how agencies are funded to combat Homelessness welcoming and encouraging public comment.

Next, Ms. Jackson explained the HOME program and the upcoming projects in the pipeline for affordable housing by use of HOME funds.

The public was also reminded that all comments would be submitted to the City Council and Housing Authority in writing.

1. Steven Meek, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commissioner: Mr. Meek expressed his appreciation for these community meetings with questions directed at homeless services outhreach, shelter operations at Ascencia, and eviction moratorium. Mr. Meek also wanted clarification on HOME program affordable housing units and if they would be for independent 34 of 117
Exhibit 4

2 living vs. assisted living. Ms. Jackson explained that the units were for independent living.

Additionally, Mr. Meek wanted to know the role of the Housing Rights Center in Glendale; what does funding for Glendale Youth Alliance entail, and available services for seniors who need nutritional meals. Each question was answered by respective city staff.

2. Regina Alcazar, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commissioner: Ms. Alcazar asked about the LA COUNTY moratorium on evictions and if they are extended. City staff were going to look into it and respond. Homeless Services questions included if staff tracks phone calls for homeless prevention requests. City staff expl ained how data is collected. Ms. Alcazar asked what were the program priorities for this year based on the needs assessment? Staff responded with the FY2022-2023 priorities which included youth services, homeless services, however this year the CDBG Advis ory Committee focused on making recommendations for homeless services programs. Ms. Alcazar asked about difficulties in reaching people with different language barriers and can we create a website that is user friendly, flyer within GUSD, flyers in public spaces and create “community engagement channels”. Staff and attendees concurred all avenues are good to get the word out to the public.

3. Anita Quiñonez Gabrielian, CDBG Advisory Committee Vice Chair: Ms. Gabrielian asked about the HOME program and where subsidies come from. Ms. Jackson from the HOME program explained. Ms. Gabrielian wanted to know how do we foster more community engagement and gather input from the public to better understand community needs/wants. Staff explained the 5-year Consoli dated Plan program priorities and how we can engage low to moderate households to attend meetings and staff to go to the resident rather the resident come to meetings. Ms. Gabrielian also suggested establishing communication with local agencies to be the g ateway of communication to their low to mod income participants. Ms. Gabrielian suggestions included partnerships with PTA to target elementary, middle and high school parents. Staff accepted all suggestions and comments related to better turnout for resid ents at community meetings and explained the challenges and strategies.

Ms. Kavarian thanked everyone for attending the meeting and officially closed the Public Hearing.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:02 p.m.

Public Hearing, April 14, 2022, Via Microsoft Teams:

The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:10 p.m.

Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor opened the public hearing for the FY 2022-2023 Annual Plan and introduced dignitaries and city staff in attendance. Arsineh Isayan and Pamela Jackson helped to present during the meeting. Tamar Kabanjian used the Teams chat box feature to respond to attendee comments.

Ms. Kavarian and the Team provided a Power Point presentation which included: purpose of the meeting, a flowchart of the CDBG Annual Program Planning Process FY2022 -2023; CDBG funding allocation plan, and the proposed FY2022 -2023 Annual Action Plan for Com munity 35 of 117
Exhibit 4

3 Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant, and HOME Programs; and encouraged public comment.

During the presentations Ms. Kavarian explained the program planning process, briefly highlighted the steps in the process that led to public he aring and review to obtain comments from the public for FY2022 -2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs. She explained the Proposal Evaluation Process and how the CDBG Advisory Committee met on March 4 and March 7, 2022 to review the proposals, interview the agen cies and make funding recommendations.

Ms. Kavarian reviewed the proposed Annual Action Plan for FY22 -23 and stated that the funding recommendations will be submitted to the City Council for final approval on May 24, 2022. At this time final allocations have not been released by HUD and the CDBG Advisory Committee made recommendations based on a Contingency Plan to increase/decrease funding from Public Social Services and Capital Improvement Projects.

1. Steven Meek, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commissioner: Mr. Meek asked what the CDBG Committee actually do and how long do they get to review the community agency proposals. He also asked if all the funding comes from HUD or some from the City.

Mr. Meek asked if low to mod income changes annually and if the qualification change. He also asked if there are drawings of outdoor spaces for the HOME program ’s affordable housing units. He asked about the rents going to the landlord and if the City also gets a percentage of the project to offer new proj ects? Mr. Meek asked why the 3 affordable housing units had different costs per unit at the sites? He also asked if community agencies go to the CDBG Committee to make a decision on the proposals and if the agencies explain what they will be doing with t he funding to the Committee. City staff from CDBG, ESG and HOME program answered questions related to each program. Mr. Meek then inquired about where the gap funding for the Fremont Park Renovation Project coming from. Director of CSP Mr. Bulanikian responded with the funding to include general funds, CDBG and DIF (Development Impact Fees). Mr. Meek asked if there is a follow up to make sure CIP funding is being used properly. Ms. Kavarian explained the follow up that is required in a CIP project. Mr. Meek asked about homeless services projects and Ms. Isayan followed up with information.

2. Selina Safarian, Armenian Relief Society: Ms. Safarian asked when applications will be open again and how may they apply for affordable housing units for the HOME program 3 projects. Ms. Safarian asked about the HOME projects related to tax credit funding and investments

After encouraging for more comments a nd reminding the public to share information into the chat box, Ms. Kavarian thanked everyone for attending the meeting and officially closed the Public Hearing.

The Meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m.

No Telephone Comments were received.

No Email comments were received.
36 of 117

FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs

A. Proposed Negative Declaration (attached).

B. Initial Study Checklist (attached).

C. Comments received on the Proposed Negative Declaration through the consultation process.

There were no comments received from within the governmental agency or from other public agencies or private sources.

D. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

No Mitigation Measures are required.

Community Development Department
City of Glendale
April 12, 2022
EXHIBIT 5
37 of 117

PROPOSED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs

The following Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Guidelines and Procedures of the City of Glendale.

Project Title/Common Name: FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs Project Location: Glendale, Los Angeles County, California: Glendale is located northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded by the cities of Burbank, Pasadena, La Canada Flintridge and the Los Angeles communities of Tujunga, Eagle Rock and Los Feliz.

Project Description: Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department for the fiscal year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and HOME programs.

Project Type: Private Project Public Project
Project Applicant: Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department 141 N. Glendale Avenue, Room 202
Glendale, CA 91206
Findings: The Director of the Community Development, on April 21, 2022, after considering an Initial Study prepared by the Planning Division, found that the above referenced project would not have a significant effect on the environment and instructed that a Negative Declaration be prepared.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Attachments: Initial Study Checklist
Contact Person: Erik Krause, Deputy Director of Community Development City of Glendale, Community Development Department
633 East Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206-4386
Tel: (818) 548-8157
Fax: (818) 240-0392

38 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 2
This page left intentionally blank.

39 of 117

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 3

1. Project Title: FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Glendale Community Development Department
Planning Division
633 East Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Erik Krause, Deputy Director of Community Development
Tel: (818) 937-8156
Fax: (818) 240-0392

4. Project Location: Glendale, Los Angeles County, California: Glendale is located northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded by the cities of Burbank, Pasadena, La Canada Flintridge and the Los Angeles communities of Tujunga, Eagle Rock and Los Feliz.

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor
City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department 141 N. Glendale Avenue, Room 202
Glendale, CA 91206

6. General Plan Designation: N/A

7. Zoning: N/A

8. Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to, later phases of the project, and any secondary support or off-site features necessary for its implementation.)
Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department for the fiscal year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME programs. See attached Action Plan for full description.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The projects are located throughout the City of Glendale, and as such the surrounding uses vary depending on location.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement).

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
40 of 117
41 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 5
A. AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X

2. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
X

3. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
X

4. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
X
Comments to Sections A(1), (2), (3), and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on aesthetics as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect scenic vistas, damage scenic resources, degrade the visual character of any sites or create substantial light or glare.

Potential aesthetic impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project - specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

B. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997, as updated) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.

42 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 6

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
X

2. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X

3. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code
Section 51104(g))?
X

4. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X

5. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
X
Comments to Sections B(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5):

The City of Glendale does not contain any agricultural resources or lands currently zoned for agricultural uses; instead, Glendale is an urbanized area with a mixture of commercial, residential and industrial uses. Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs would not have a negative impact on agricultural resources because there is no “prime farmland,” “unique farmland” or “farmland of statewide importance” that could be converted to non-agricultural use; no existing zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act contracts; and no farmland that could be converted to non-agricultural use. There is no existing zoning of forest land or timberland in the City of Glendale. No forest land could be converted to non-forest use under the proposed project.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

C. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied on to make the following determinations.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? X

2. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
X

3. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X

4. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
X
43 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 7
Comments to Sections C(1), (2), (3), and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on air quality as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect air quality.

Potential air quality impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project - specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service?
X

2. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X

3. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
X

4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
X

5. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
X

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X
Comments to Sections D(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on biological resources as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect biological resources.

Potential impacts on biological resources could result from capital and neighborhood improv ement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.
44 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 8
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
X

2. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5?
X

3. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries? X
Comments to Sections E(1), (2), and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on cultural resources as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect cultural resources.

Potential impacts on cultural resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

F. ENERGY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
X

2. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency? X
Comments to Sections F(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on energy as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand.

As such, these programs would not adversely affect energy consumption or obstruct with state of local energy plans.

Potential impacts on energy could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project - specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 45 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 9
G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.

X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction? X
iv) Landslides? X

2. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? X

3. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on-or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
X

4. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994, as
updated), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
X

5. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of waste water?
X

6. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X
Comments to Sections F(1)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with geology and soils as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect geology and soils.

Potential impacts associated with geology and soils could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

46 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 10
H. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
X

2. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
X
Comments to Sections H(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with greenhouse gases as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not result in direct or indirect impacts related to the generation of greenhouse gases or conflict with applicable plans.

Potential impacts associated with greenhouse gases could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
X

2. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
X

3. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
X

4. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
X

5. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
X

6. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
X

7. Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
X
47 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 11
Comments to Sections I(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with hazards and hazardous materials as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect hazards and hazardous materials.

Potential impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

J. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface of groundwater quality?
X

2. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
X

3. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:

i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site; X
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site;
X
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
X
iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X

4. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? X

5. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
X
Comments to Sections J(1), (2), (3)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (4) and (5):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with hydrology and water quality as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect hydrology and water quality.

Potential impacts associated with hydrology and water quality could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects 48 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 12
would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

K. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Physically divide an established community? X

2. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
X
Comments to Sections K(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with land use and planning as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. The majority of the programs are included in the City’s updated Housing Element adopted in February 2022. As such, these programs would not adversely affect land use and planning.

Potential impacts associated with land use and planning could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

L. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
X

2. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
X
Comments to Sections L(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with the availability of know mineral resources as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect mineral resources.
49 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 13
Potential impacts associated with the availability of know mineral resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

M. NOISE
Would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
X

2. G eneration of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? X

3. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
X
Comments to Sections M(1), (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with noise as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect noise.

Potential impacts associated with noise could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

N. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
X

2. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
X

50 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 14
Comments to Sections N(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with population and housing as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect population and housing.

Potential impacts associated with population and housing could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

O. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:

a) Fire protection? X
b) Police protection? X
c) Schools? X
d) Parks? X
e) Other public facilities? X
Comments to Sections O(1)(a),(b), (c), (d) and (e):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with pubic services as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect public services.

Potential impacts associated with public services could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

51 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 15
P. RECREATION

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
X

2. Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
X
Comments to Sections P(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on recreational facilities as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect recreational uses.

Conversely, the proposed programs included in the action plan would help to relieve existi ng pressure on the recreational facilities by providing after school programs away from park sites.

Potential impacts on recreational facilities could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Q. TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
X

2. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X

3. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
X

4. Result in inadequate emergency access? X
Comments to Sections Q(1), (2), (3) and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on transportation as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect transportation.

Potential impacts associated with transportation could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be 52 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 16
evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

R. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:

i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in the
local register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to
a California Native American tribe.

X
Comments to Sections R(1)(i) and (ii):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on tribal cultural resources as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect tribal cultural resources .

Potential impacts associated with tribal cultural resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

53 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 17
S. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
X

2. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X

3. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X

4. Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
X

5. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
X
Comments to Sections S(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on utilities and service systems as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect utilities and service systems.

Potential impacts on utilities and service systems could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

T. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility area or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? X

2. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X

3. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel, breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
X
54 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 18
If located in or near state responsibility area or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

4. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X
Comments to Sections T(1), (2), (3) and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associate with wildfires as the majority of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect on wildfires.

Potential wildfire impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that ar e also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project - specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

U. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Does the project have the potential to substantial
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
X

2. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)
X

3. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
Comments to Sections U(1), (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to degrade biological resources or the overall quality of the natural environment; eliminate important historic or prehistoric resources; have environmental effects causing substantial adverse effects on humans; or have cumulatively considerable impacts. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs are not considered cumulatively considerable.

Potential cumulative impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project - specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available. 55 of 117

APRIL 2022

FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 19

13. Earlier Analyses
None

14. Project References Used to Prepare Initial Study Checklist One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and are available for review in the Planning Division Office, 633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103, Glendale, CA 91206- 4386. Items used are referred to by number on the Initial Study Checklist.

1. Proposed Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Development and Housing Department for the fiscal year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and HOME programs.

2. The City of Glendale’s General Plan, “Open Space and Conservation Element,” as amended.

3. California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Los Angeles County Important Farmland 2010 (September 2011).

4. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42 (Revised 1997, Supplements 1 and 2 added 1999).

5. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning (May 2005).

6. City of Glendale, General Plan, “Safety Element” (2003).

7. California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State of California General Plan Guidelines (2017).

8. City of Glendale Municipal Code, as amended.
56 of 117
57 of 117

58 of 117

59 of 117

60 of 117

61 of 117
ՀԱՅ ՕԳՆՈՒԹԵԱՆ ՄԻՈՒԹԵԱՆ
ԱՐԵՒՄՏԵԱՆ ՄԻԱՑԵԱԼ ՆԱՀԱՆԳՆԵՐՈՒ
ԸՆԿԵՐԱՅԻՆ ԾԱՌԱՅՈՒԹԵԱՆ ԳՐԱՍԵՆԵԱԿ

ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY
OF WESTERN USA, INC.

SOCIAL SERVICES
ARS Regional Executive Board
2019-2022
 Silva Poladian, Chairperson
 Arsho Avakian, Vice-Chairperson
 Maral Touloumian, Secretary
 Anita Altounian, Treasurer
 Nancy Bederian, Advisor
 Armenouhi Tomassian, Advisor
 Araxy Aykanian, Advisor
 Varduhi Petrosyan, Advisor
 Nora Shirikian, Advisor
62 of 117
City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, Inc., Social Services 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202 Silva Poladian 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 Talar Aintablian, Director of Operations 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 Ruzanna Mkrtchyan, Financial Controller 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 Maral Touloumian, Secretary 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 N/A
63 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select addition al― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all per sons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ƒ The information in this disclosure f orm (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally auth orized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

N/A
N/A
x
3 April 20 22 Glendale Talar Aintablian
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202
(818) 241-7533 ext. 101 [email protected] 64 of 117

65 of 117

66 of 117

Ascencia Board of Directors 2021-22

OFFICERS COMMITTEE CHAIRS
Kim Guard, Board President
President/Owner
Express Employment Professionals
Member since 7/1/2016
Board Term ends 6/30/2022

Bryan Longpre, Development Committee
Chair/President Elect
Associate V. P. Financial Advisor, Morgan Stanley
Member since 11/28/2018
Board Term ends 6/30/2024
Paulette Ramsay Wood, Vice President
Retired Schindler Elevator Corporation Legal
Department, Contracts
Member since 7/1/2020
Board Term ends 6/30/2023

David Bolstad, Governance Committee Chair
Attorney, Partner, & Head of Litigation
Safarian, Choi & Bolstad, LLP
Member since 6/13/2017
Board Term ends 6/30/2023

Kristine Nam, Secretary
Communications Director
Glendale Unified School District
Member since 7/11/2017
Board Term ends 6/30/2023

Sue Son, Treasurer/Finance Committee Chair
Partner, CPA
Hutchinson and Bloodgood, LLP
Member since 9/10/2019
Board Term ends 6/30/2025
John Sadd, Audit Committee Chair
Senior Partner, CPA, and CGMA
The Accountancy
Member since 7/1/2016
Board Term ends 6/30/2022

Deacon Ron Baker, Nominations Committee Chair
Director of Operations & Ministries
Holy Family Catholic Church
Member since 7/1/2016
Board Term ends 6/30/2022

Marvel Ford
Senior V.P. and Risk Management Officer
California Credit Union
Member since 7/1/2021
Board Term ends 6/30/24

Arbella Azizian
Attorney Of Counsel, Baker, Olson,
LeCroy & Danielian
Member since 7/1/20
Board Terms ends 6/30 2023
Grace Kang
Real Estate Analyst
Panda Restaurant Group
Member since 9/12/17
Board Term Ends 6/30/2023

Barbara Perrier
Vice Chairman, Industrial
Coldwell Banker Richard Ellis (CBRE)
Member since 7/1/2021
Board Term ends 6/30/2024

Bruce Gordon
Retired, The Walt Disney Company
Worldwide Senior V.P. & CFO Disney Interactive
Media Group
Member since 3/9/2021
Board Term ends 6/30/2023

Natasha Madarian
Vice President Business Development
Universal Diagnostic Laboratories
Member since 1/10/2021
Board Term ends 6/30/2023

67 of 117
Ascencia Board of Directors 2021-22

Daniel Valdez
Housing Acquisitions Manager
Brilliant Corners
Member since 3/12/2019
Board Term ends 6/30/2022

Anthony Rubio
Construction Coordinator
Forest Lawn Memorial Park
Member since 6/13/2017
Board Term ends 6/30/2023

Terry Walker
Director Clinical Institutes & Community
Engagement
Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center
Member Since 02/01/2021
Board Term Ends 6/30/23

*Emeritus, Nicholas Lam
Vice President, Pacific BMW
800 S. Brand Blvd.

Glendale, CA 91204
Office: (818) 246-5600
Member since 10/1/2006

Isabel Reyes
Chief Executive Officer
Revelation Insurance Services
Member since 7/1/2018
Board Term ends 6/30/2024

Stuart Cano
Vice President Relationship Manager
Bank of Southern California
Member since 1/11/2022
Board Term Ends 6/30/2025

Philip Ambrose
Battalion Chief
Glendale Fire Department
Member since 3/8/2022
Board Term ends 6/30/2024

*Non-voting Member

68 of 117
City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
7KH&LW\&RXQFLODGRSWHG2UGLQDQFH1R³&DPSDLJQ)LQDQFH2UGLQDQFH´ZKLFKEHFDPHHIIHFWLYHRQ6HSWHPEHU DQGDPHQGHGLWZLWK2UGLQDQFH1R
ZKLFKEHFDPHHIIHFWLYHRQ0DUFK
³WKH2UGLQDQFH´
7KH2UGLQDQFHSURKLELWV


$FRQWUDFWRU

LQFOXGLQJDVXEFRQWUDFWRU

ʊZKRKDVDFRQWUDFWZLWKWKH&LW\
RI*OHQGDOH
³&LW\´
(FRQRPLF'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW
³(''´
RUWKH+RXVLQJ$XWKRULW\RIWKH&LW\RI*OHQGDOH
³+$´
DQGWKDWFRQWUDFWLVVXEMHFWWRDSSURYDOE\WKH&LW\
&RXQFLO(''RU+$ʊIURPPDNLQJDFRQWULEXWLRQWRD&LW\&RXQFLOPHPEHU(''PHPEHU+$PHPEHU&LW\&OHUNRU&LW\7UHDVXUHU DQG

&RXQFLOPHPEHUV(''
PHPEHUVDQG+$PHPEHUVIURPYRWLQJRQPDWWHUVFRQFHUQLQJDFRQWUDFWZLWKDSHUVRQZKRKDVSURYLGHGDFDPSDLJQFRQWULEXWLRQ 7KH2UGLQDQFHDSSOLHVWRDFRQWUDFWRUZKRVHFRQWUDFWUHTXLUHVWKH&LW\&RXQFLO¶V('' VRU+$¶VDSSURYDO$FRQWUDFWZLWKWKH&LW\(''RU+$LVNQRZQDVD³&LW\ &RQWUDFW´7KH2UGLQDQFHDOVRDSSOLHVWRDVXEFRQWUDFWRUZKRKDVDVXEFRQWUDFWWKURXJKD&LW\&RQWUDFW7KH2UGLQDQFHH[FOXGHVDFRPSHWLWLYHO\ELGFRQWUDFWDZDUGHGWR WKHORZHVWUHVSRQVLEOHELGGHU
7RDVVLVWPHPEHUVRIWKH&LW\&RXQFLO(''DQG+$EHIRUHWKH\YRWHRQDPDWWHUUHJDUGLQJD&LW\&RQWUDFWWKH2UGLQDQFHUHTXLUHV&LW\VWDIIWRSUHSDUHWKLVUHSRUWZKLFK GLVFORVHVFHUWDLQLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW
WKHFRQWUDFWRUUHFHLYLQJWKH&LW\&RQWUDFWDQGWKHVXEFRQWUDFWRU V
ZRUNLQJXQGHUWKH&LW\&RQWUDFW
A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
x The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or x The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
x A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. x A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: Ɣ Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) Ɣ Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
Ɣ Chief Operating Officer
Ɣ Chief Financial Officer
Ɣ Chairperson
Ɣ All members of the Board of Directors
Ɣ All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization Ɣ Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, ('', or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 69 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, enti ty, or organization that has entered into a c ontract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or or ganization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
x I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute ʊ or if I select additional ʊ architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and x I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ƒ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
70 of 117

71 of 117

72 of 117

73 of 117

74 of 117

75 of 117

76 of 117
77 of 117
78 of 117

79 of 117

CONFIDENTIAL
80 of 117
81 of 117

82 of 117

83 of 117
84 of 117
85 of 117
86 of 117
City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pres
ident
● Chief Op
erating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members
of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, en
tity, or organization
● Name of any
campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organi zation Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena
735 East Lexington Drive, Glendale, CA 91206
Tara Peterson
Tori Fisk Letlough
Jessica First
Tara Peterson
735 East Lexington Drive
735 East Lexington Drive
735 East Lexington Drive
735 East Lexington Drive
735 East Lexington Drive
Glendale
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
91206
Glendale
Glendale
Glendale
Glendale
91206
91206
91206
91206
(Board Roster attached)
N/A
87 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select addition al― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all per sons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ƒ The information in this disclosure f orm (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally auth orized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

X
3 Friday, April 29
22 735 E. Lexington Dr. Glendale, CA 91206
(818) 242-4155
[email protected]
Tara Peterson
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena in Glendale
88 of 117

1 Board of Directors
2021-2022
Updated March 16, 2022
Board President

JESSICA FIRST
CEO & Chief Strategist - Kilter
Treasurer/VP of Internal Affairs Committee

JILL WELTON
President/CEO
Dignity Health - Glendale Memorial Hospital
VP of External Affairs Committee

ROSIE TER-MATEVOSYAN
Financial Advisor
Merrill Lynch
Co-VP of Governance Committee

SHUSHAN BARSEGYAN
Founder and Partner
Full Circle Business Law
Co-VP of Governance Committee
T.C. KIM
President
Korean American Foundation of Glendale
Secretary

VALERIE MERRITT
Retired Lawyer

RICHARD BENNETT
Retired
CEO and Owner, FCI Systems Corporation

ANITA CHAN
Vice President, Relationship Manager
Comerica Bank

SHELBY JIGGETTS-TIVONY
Vice-President of Global Creative and
Advanced Development
Disney Live Entertainment

MANE KHACHATRYAN
Attorney At Law
Harris Ginsberg

MARIE LEMELLE
MBA, Founder/CEO
Platinum Star PR and Platinum Star Media Group

MANUEL MAGPAPIAN
Attorney at Law
Pillemer and Pillemer

TALINE SAAD
Executive Vice President
Opulent Remodeling & Construction

WESLEY WALTON
Chief Executive Officer
Glendale Area Schools Credit Union
89 of 117
City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pres
ident
● Chief Op
erating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members
of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, en
tity, or organization
● Name of any
campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organi zation Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Southern California Housing Rights Center dba Housing Rights Center Aaron M. May -------------- President of the Board 550 S. Hope, #2330 Los Angeles CA 90071 Chancela Al-Mansour 3255 Wilshire Blvd. #1150 Los Angeles CA 90010 Javier Beltran --------------------------- Deputy Director, Wilshire address Danny Batalla Wilshire address please see attached
awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
contract
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ED0654E-466E-48E0-AD7B-57B11F655013 90 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; ƒ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
x
3 22 Los Angeles
Chancela Al-Mansour
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1150, Los Angeles, CA 90010
(213) 387-8400 ext 1111 [email protected] DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ED0654E-466E-48E0-AD7B-57B11F655013 4/26/2022
91 of 117

Board of Directors January 2022

Aaron M. May, President

Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg LLP
550 S. Hope Street, Suite 2330
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Main: (213) 402-1900
Direct: (213) 402-1920
[email protected]

Alexander K. Robinson, Vice President

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA
90071-3197

(213) 229-7342
(213) 229-6342 Fax
[email protected]

Robert K. Johnson, Treasurer

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
350 S. Grand Avenue, 50th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071

(213) 683-9109
(213) 683-5109 Fax
[email protected]

Dennis Perez, Secretary

Hochman, Salkin,Toscher & Perez, P.C.
9100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900W
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-3414

(310) 281-3200
[email protected]

Sofia Aguilar

NBC/Universal
100 Universal City Plaza
Building 1440, Suite 1600
Universal City, CA 91608

(818) 840-4444
[email protected]

Aaron Bloom

TroyGould PC
1801 Century Park East, Ste. 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2367

(310) 789-1222
(310) 789-1422 Fax
[email protected]

Audrey M. Harris

Yoga Instructor
1517 Westholme Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90024

(310) 474-0326
[email protected]
Robert Kitson

Myers Law Group
6464 Sunset Blvd., Ste. 1070
Hollywood, CA 90028

Direct: (213) 281-9114
Main: (909) 919-2027 ext. 1014
[email protected]

Grant Michaelson

Vice President, Business Affairs and New Media
ABC Entertainment
500 S. Buena Vista St.

Burbank, CA 91521

(818) 460-5512
(818) 460-5967 Fax
[email protected]

Alisa Schlesinger

Walt Disney Pictures
500 S. Buena Vista St.

Burbank, CA 91521

(818) 306-7252
[email protected]

Kenneth Trujillo-Jamison

Willenken LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 3850
Los Angeles, CA 90017

(213) 955-8031
(310) 252-4067
[email protected]

Grant Habata
Law Office of Grant M. Habata
2118 Wilshire Boulevard, #353
Santa Monica, CA 90403
(310) 866-2600
(310) 228-3123
[email protected]

Advisory Board

Marjie Mautner

3715 Valley Meadow Rd.

Encino, CA 91436

(818) 986-3356
(818) 986-3357 fax
[email protected]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ED0654E-466E-48E0-AD7B-57B11F655013 92 of 117
Armenian Bar Association
Campaign Finance Disclosure Form

April 21, 2022

All addresses are:

P.O. Box 29111
Los Angeles, CA 90029

Board of Governors
Executive Committee
Lucy Varpetian
Chairwoman
Los Angeles, CA
Taline Sahakian
Vice-Chair
New York, NY
Raffi Sarrafian
Vice-Chair
Chicago, IL
Gerard V. Kassabian
Treasurer
Beverly Hills, CA
Grant Petrosyan
Secretary
New York, NY

Members at Large
Honorable Amy Ashvanian
Los Angeles, CA
Hrag Alex Bastian
Los Angeles, CA
Elizabeth Al-Dajani
Evanston, IL
Harry H. Dikranian
Montreal, Quebec
Aram Gavoor
Washington, D.C.

Levon Golendukhin
New York, NY
Armen K. Hovannisian
Los Angeles, CA
Souren Israelyan
New York, NY
Mesrop Khoudagoulian
Glendale, CA
Scott A. Ohnegian
Morristown, NJ
Tigran Palyan
Los Angeles, CA
Ovsanna Takvoryan
Encino, CA

NALSA Representative
Hrag Kitsinian
Los Angeles, CA

93 of 117
City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Lucy Varpetian
Gerard Kassabian
Taline Sahakian
P.O. Box 29111
P.O. Box 29111
P.O. Box 29111
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
CA 90029
CA 90029
CA 90029
94 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; ƒ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
n/a
x
2 04/21/2022 Glendale
Lucy Varpetian
PO Box 29111, Los Angeles, CA 90029
3236613128 [email protected]
95 of 117

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Robert A. Schacht
6512 San Fernando Road
Glendale
CA
91201
Nancy N. Niebrugge
6512 San Fernando Road
Glendale
CA
91201
Claudia Sandoval
6512 San Fernando Road
Glendale
CA
91201
N/A
see attachment
6512 San Fernando Road
Glendale
CA
91201

THE CAMPBELL CENTER
6512 San Fernando Road
Glendale, CA 91201
96 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; ƒ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 May 6
22 6512 San Fernando Road
Glendale, CA 91201
(818) 242-2434
[email protected]
Nancy N. Niebrugge
2:50 pm
97 of 117

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Jack Darakjian Board of Directors
Treasurer
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Muhannad Malki Board of Directors
Vice Chair
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Kim Guard Board of Directors
Recording Secretary
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
AnGèle Cade Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Anoush Kervanian Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Patricia Larrigan Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Rodney Mardirosian Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Alex Parajon Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Deb Rinder Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Stephen Ropfogel Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
JoAnn Sparks Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201
Gregory Just Board of Directors
Member
6512 San Fernando Road Glendale Ca 91201

98 of 117
EXHIBIT 7
ESG 2021-2023
ESG Fiscal Yr.

Shelter Services Costs
Shelter Operations
Essential Services
Homeless
Prevention/
Rapid Re-housing HMIS Admin Total
$ -
Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention
Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc.

FY2021-22 $ - $ 24,427.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 26,027.00
FY2022-23 $ 35,037.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 36,637.00
Total $ 62,664.00
$ -
Sunrise Village Emergency Shelter
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena
FY2021-22 $ 35,662.00 $ 35,270.00 $ 70,932.00
FY2022-23 $ 24,710.00 $ 50,590.00 $ 75,300.00
Total $ 146,232.00
Emergency Housing Program
Ascencia
FY2021-22 $ 57,610.00 $ - $ 3,454.00 $ 61,064.00
FY2022-23 $ 39,918.00 $ 3,454.00 $ 43,372.00
Total $ 104,436.00
HMIS
City of Glendale
FY2021-22 $ 5,219.00 $ 5,219.00
FY2022-23 $ (5,219.00) $ -
Total $ 5,219.00
ESG Administration
City of Glendale
FY2021-22 $ - $ - $ 7,108.00 $ 7,108.00
FY2022-23 $ 6,254.00 $ 6,254.00
Total $ 13,362.00
FY 2021-22 Allocation $ 170,350.00 $ 93,272.00 $ 59,697.00 $ 5,219.00 $ 12,162.00 $ 170,350.00 FY 2022-23 Allocation $ 161,563.00 $ 64,628.00 $ 85,627.00 $ (5,219.00) $ 11,308.00 $ 161,563.00 MAX % Allowed Per Category FY 2022-23 40.00% 53.00% 7.00% TOTAL ESG FUNDING FY 2021-2023 $ 157,900.00 $ 145,324.00 $ - $ 23,470.00 $ 331,913.00 99 of 117
1 RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION

UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR THE FY 2022-2023 CDBG, ESG, AND HOME ANNUAL ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development— after having considered the Initial Study prepared on behalf of Community Services and Parks Department for the proposed Annual Action Plan for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs in the City of Glendale, California (“Project”)— directed that a Proposed Negative Declaration be prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the Proposed Negative Declaration was published, was duly noticed as required by law, and was made available for a 20-day public review and comment period; and
WHEREAS, a Final Negative Declaration (“Negative Declaration”) has been prepared. The Negative Declaration— which is incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth— takes into account any comments received during the review period and any responses to those comments; and
WHEREAS, the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Glendale; and
WHEREAS, the Negative Declaration was provided to the City Council of the City of Glendale for consideration at the June 14, 2022 Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the findings of the Director of Community Development with respect to the preparation of the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Glendale Community Development Department has been identified as the custodian of record for the Negative Declaration.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1.The recitals set forth above are true and correct.

SECTION 2.The Negative Declaration for the Project was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State and Local Guidelines. 100 of 117
2 SECTION 3.The Negative Declaration has been presented to the City Council.

The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study, the Negative Declaration, and public comments, and finds on the whole record before it that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, the City Council hereby certifies and adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the Project.

Adopted this __________ day of _______________, 2022.

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Aram Adjemian, Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ________ day of _______________, 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
101 of 117
2 9
8 1
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the City Council of the City of Glendale:

1. Has reviewed and approves the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800 (“Plan”) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Programs, as recommended by the Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee and modified by staff, and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and as more particularly outlined in the June 14, 2022 Report (including its attachments and exhibits) to the Joint Meeting of City Council and Housing Authority of the City of Glendale;

2. Authorizes staff to submit the Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and

3. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee approval.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
102 of 117
MOTION
Moved by Housing Authority Member ____________________________, seconded by Housing Authority Member ___________________________, that the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale:

1. Has reviewed and approves the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan totaling $3,529,800 (“Plan”) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Programs, as recommended by the Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee and modified by staff, and the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and as more particularly outlined in the June 14, 2022 Report (including its attachments and exhibits) to the Joint Meeting of the Glendale City Council and Housing Authority; and

2. Authorizes staff to submit the Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
103 of 117
2 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Adoption of the FY 2022-23 Glendale Housing Authority Budget with Approval of a Professional Services Contract Amendment with Emphasys Software 1) Resolution of the City Council Making Findings and Approving Expenditures of Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds for Administration and Planning and Expenditures Outside Redevelopment Project Areas for the FY 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget;
2) Resolution of the Housing Authority Making Findings and Approving Expenditures of Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds for Administration and Planning and Expenditures Outside Redevelopment Project Areas for the FY 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget and Adopting the FY 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget; and 3) Motion of the Housing Authority to Approve an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Emphasys Software (C105966A) to Increase the Contract Amount by $77,418 for a New “Not to Exceed” Contract of $486,425 for a Computer Software License with Maintenance and Hosting of the Housing Authority Owner Portal; and to Extend the Agreement Term for One Year to End August 31, 2023.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 14, 2022 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community Development Department, Housing Division presents the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget of all Housing funds for consideration and budget adoption. 104 of 117
2 2
3 3
3 5

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Fiscal Responsibility.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the FY 22-23 budget as presented, make the required findings to utilize funds outside of the Redevelopment Project Areas, and amend the contract with Emphasys Software. These approvals will be necessary to continue successfully managing the Housing programs in Glendale.

BACKGROUND
The proposed budget for the Glendale Housing Authority is $53,920,475 for FY 2022-

23. The proposed housing budget was presented and discussed as part of the Department Presentation during the Budget Study Session #2 held on May 3, 2022.

The Housing Authority Budget is primarily a grant funded/special revenue specific budget with funding from:
• Federal sources that are received on an annual basis; • Encumbered assets/program income from previous investments of Redevelopment 20% Housing Set Aside funds;
• Development related affordable housing fees including the Affordable Housing Density Bonus fee, City-Wide Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu fee, and the Commercial Development Impact fee; and
• One-time State grant awards.

The Housing Authority has the responsibility for administering the following programs:
• The Housing Assistance Fund (2020) – which provides federal Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV), VASH, and Mainstream Vouchers for rental assistance to low income households. Also included is the newly created (2021) Emergency Housing Vouchers (EHV) to assist individuals and families who are homeless, at-risk of homelessness, fleeing, or attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking, or were recently homeless or have a high risk of housing instability;
• The HOME Grant Fund (2030) – which provides federal funds for housing development and preservation activities for low income households; • The Continuum of Care Grant Fund (2040) – (operated by Community Services & Parks) which provides federal funds for supportive services and/or Rapid Re-Housing, permanent, and innovative housing to assist homeless people achieve independence including Rapid Re- Housing, Permanent, and Innovative Supportive Housing; 105 of 117
3 2
3 3
3 5
• The Affordable Housing Trust Fund (2090) – which holds funds received from inclusionary housing fees, affordable housing density bonus fees, and miscellaneous program income to be expended on affordable housing purposes not covered by other restricted state and federal housing funds;
• The BEGIN Affordable Homeownership Fund (2120) – which provides State funds for down payment assistance to first time home buyers who are Moderate Income households (currently invested in the Doran Gardens project); • The LMIHAF Fund (2130) – which holds income and encumbered assets from previous 20% Redevelopment Set Aside funds for housing development and preservation activities (including administration and program delivery) for Low and Moderate Income households, in accordance with State law; and • The Housing Mitigation Fee Fund (4110) – which will receive deposits from the Commercial Development Impact Fee and is a new fund set up for tracking and legal/reporting purposes.

In addition to the above, although not included in the Housing Authority administered budget, the following funding is also available for affordable housing purposes, which is included as part of the proposed City’s Budget:

•Housing Acquisition, Assistance and Services (Measure S) – which provides for the acquisition of property for new affordable housing development, housing assistance through the Monthly Housing Subsidy Program and landlord/tenant services through the Rental Rights Program.

The FY 2022-23 proposed budget for each of the Housing Funds is summarized in attached Exhibit 1 and must be approved by the Housing Authority. For the Continuum of Care Grant Fund (2040), all of the FY 2022-23 budget will be a carryover from the FY 2021-22 budget due to the entire amount of the grant ($2,741,171) being appropriated in May 2022 (FY 2021-22).

Requirement for Findings Related to Former Redevelopment Areas:

Despite substantial changes to the sections of the California Law that apply to Redevelopment (including the dissolution of Redevelopment agencies), some elements of Redevelopment law remain. Redevelopment Project Areas were not eliminated and the requirement remains to approve proposed expenditures of the Redevelopment 20% Set Aside program income (LMIHAF) funds outside the project area as being necessary in order to increase, improve and preserve the supply of affordable housing within the 106 of 117
4 2
3 3
3 5
City. Also, the requirement to approve the necessity and appropriateness of the expenditure of LMIHAF funds for administration and planning purposes remains as well.

This has been approved annually in previous year’s budgets and new City Council and Housing Authority resolutions are included in this report to meet those State requirements.

Information Regarding Section 8 HCV, VASH and Mainstream Program Expenditures Review:

In preparing the Section 8 federal fund expenditures included in the FY 2022-23 proposed Housing Authority Budget, expenditures have been reviewed for conformance with HUD’s requirements under the Uniform Administrative requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit requirement for Federal Awards.

FY 2022-23 Proposed Contractual Services Request
Emphasys Computer Solutions, Inc. dba Emphasys Software (Emphasys): Emphasys is a respected, efficient, and effective database for managing the complex relationships between property owner, a renter, the Housing Authority, and HUD for the Section 8 program. Beyond its software tools and product support, one of the strengths of Emphasys Software is that it has developed a strong relationship with HUD that allows it to work closely with HUD to integrate new or changing regulations and program components into its software system. Housing Authorities through the country use this software system, including local agencies such as Anaheim, Long Beach, San Diego County, and most importantly, the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (HACLA). There are approximately 1,300 families with HACLA port vouchers residing in Glendale. Reconciliation of monthly payments between Glendale and HACLA is much more efficient due to the use of the same software.

As in previous years, staff is seeking funding to renew the annual service contract with Emphasys. Extending and funding the existing contract for the coming fiscal year will provide Section 8 operations with an ongoing service agreement for supporting the software and annual hosting of a new owner portal and upgrades that were authorized by the Housing Authority in October 2020. The proposed amendment would extend the contract for an eighth year of support and licensing.

An amendment to the PSA with Emphasys (C105966A) is necessary to support ongoing Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program activities. The proposed amendment would increase the approved contract amount by $77,418 to a new total amount not to exceed $486,425 and extend the contract for one year through August 31, 2023.

ANALYSIS
This is a fiscally responsible budget, meeting Council’s goal of providing quality housing 107 of 117
5 2
3 3
3 5
to the Glendale community. The presented budget, findings, and contract amendment will allow the Housing division to continue to successfully administer a robust Housing program.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
This report presents the annual proposed FY 2022-23 Housing Budget of $53,920,475 to the Glendale Housing Authority for adoption (referenced in Exhibit 1). No General Fund dollars are proposed for this budget as all programs, projects, staff and operations are fully funded with special revenues.

Emphasys Computer Solutions, Inc. dba Emphasys Software:

This contract amendment will cost $77,418, which is included in the proposed FY 2022- 23 budget as follows:

Amount Account String Funding Source
$77,418 GL: 43110-2020-CDD-0020-P0000
PL: G65001
Housing Assistance Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Mke findings and approve expenditures of the LMIHA Funds for administration and planning and expenditures outside Redevelopment Project Areas for the FY 2022-23 proposed Housing Authority Budget; the Housing Authority may approve the FY 2022-23 proposed Housing Authority Budget; and the Housing Authority may approve the contract amendment with Emphasys Computer Systems.

Alternative 2: Disapprove the proposed findings and expenditures of the funds from LMIHAF for administration and planning and expenditures outside Redevelopment Project Areas for the FY 2022-23 proposed Housing Authority Budget; the Housing Authority may disapprove the FY 2022-23 proposed Housing Authority Budget; and the Housing Authority may reject the contract amendment with Emphasys Computer 108 of 117
6 2
3 3
3 5
Systems. This would result in the delay of Section 8 operations and greatly impact their effectiveness in providing affordable housing and housing assistance.

Alternative 3: The City Council and Housing Authority may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Peter Zovak, Assistant Director of Community Development Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: FY 2022-23 Glendale Housing Authority Budget Summary Exhibit 2: Campaign Disclosure Forms
109 of 117

CITY OF GLENDALE

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY
SUMMARY OF THE FY 22-23 BUDGET
Exhibit 1
2020 - Housing
Assistance Fund
2030 - Home Grant
Fund
2040 - Continuum
of Care Grant
Fund*
2090 - Affordable
Housing Trust Fund
2120 - BEGIN
Affordable
Homeownership
Fund
2130 - Low&Mod
Income Housing
Asset Fund
4110 - Housing
Development
Impact Fee Fund Total
Estimated Resources
Interest/Use of Money and Property 76,000$
-$
-$
29,000$
-$
93,000$
-$
198,000$
Charges for Services - - - 73,050 - - - 73,050
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - 200,000 200,000
Revenue from Other Agencies 49,944,290 1,569,833 - - - - - 51,514,123 Misc and Non-Operating Revenue - 129,999 - - 10,000 1,300,000 - 1,439,999 TOTAL RESOURCES 50,020,290$ 1,699,832$ -$ 102,050$
10,000$
1,393,000$ 200,000$
53,425,172$
Estimated Appropriations
Salaries & Benefits 2,771,256$ 188,533$
-$
224,615$
-$
407,941$
-$
3,592,345$
Maintenance & Operation 47,179,434 1,511,299 - 35,451 10,000 1,591,946 - 50,328,130 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 49,950,690$ 1,699,832$ -$ 260,066$ 10,000$ 1,999,887$ -$ 53,920,475$ NET SURPLUS/(USE OF FUND BALANCE) 69,600$
-$
-$
(158,016)$ -$
(606,887)$ 200,000$
(495,303)$
*Fund 2040 – 2020 Continuum of Care Grant ($2,741,171) appropriated in May 2022. Projects will carryover to FY 2022-23. 110 of 117

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Trapeze Software Group
Emphasys Computer Solutions, Inc. dba Emphasys Software Daniel Lee
Tyler O'Hagan, Damain McKay
Yanelli Martin
1200 SW 145th Ave Suite 301, Pembroke Pines, FL 33027
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
5265 Rockwell Drive Cedar Rapids IA 52402 Zoho Sign Document ID: WRGKZAD9OZ_YQVQR811MXSB-MGVXR5MTU9AODW0TWNY 111 of 117

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select addition al― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
ƒ I have identified all per sons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ƒ The information in this disclosure f orm (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ƒ I have been legally auth orized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

None
None
X
2 1200 SW 145th Ave Suite 301, Pembroke Pines, FL 33027 Daniel Lee
(800) 968-6884 [email protected]
Zoho Sign Document ID: WRGKZAD9OZ_YQVQR811MXSB-MGVXR5MTU9AODW0TWNY Toronto, Canada
22 Jun 14 2022
112 of 117

C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\JOINT_HACC_06142022_CC_Resolution_2a.pdf RESOLUTION No. ___________

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

AND EXPENDITURES OUTSIDE THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS FOR THE 2022-23 HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“Housing Authority”) administers the Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3 for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the City’s affordable housing stock; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority must incur certain administrative expenses in connection with its programs to increase, improve and preserve the supply of affordable housing within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority finds that the expenditure of LMIHAF outside the Central Glendale and the San Fernando Road Corridor Redevelopment Project areas (the “Project Areas”) will be of benefit to the Project Areas as the completion of project implementation within the Project Areas and will continue to generate jobs within the Project Areas, thereby creating the need for programs throughout the City to increase the supply of affordable housing and improve and preserve the City’s existing affordable housing stock.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The Council finds and determines that the planning and administrative expenses provided for in the Housing Authority’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget to be made from the LMIHAF are necessary for the production, improvement and preservation of low- and moderate- income housing and directly relate to the projects and programs funded by the LMIHAF.

SECTION 2.The Council finds that the expenditure of LMIHAF outside the Redevelopment Project areas (Central and San Fernando) will be of benefit to the Redevelopment Project areas as the implementation of the Redevelopment Projects has and will continue to generate jobs in the Redevelopment Projects, thereby creating the need for programs throughout the City to increase the supply of affordable housing and improve and preserve the City’s existing affordable housing stock.

Adopted this _____ day of June, 2022.
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
113 of 117
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\JOINT_HACC_06142022_CC_Resolution_2a.pdf

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Aram Adjemian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________
City Clerk
114 of 117
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\JOINT_HACC_06142022_HA_Resolution_2b.pdf RESOLUTION No. ___________

RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

AND EXPENDITURES OUTSIDE THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS FOR THE 2022-23 HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET AND ADOPTING
THE 2022-23 HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“Housing Authority”) administers the Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33334.3 for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the City’s affordable housing stock; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority must incur certain administrative expenses in connection with its programs to increase, improve and preserve the supply of affordable housing within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority finds that the expenditure of LMIHAF monies outside the Central Glendale and the San Fernando Road Corridor Redevelopment Project areas (the “Project Areas”) will be of benefit to the Project Areas as the completion of project implementation within the Project Areas and will continue to generate jobs within the Project Areas, thereby creating the need for programs throughout the City to increase the supply of affordable housing and improve and preserve the City’s existing affordable housing stock; and

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.The Housing Authority finds and determines that the planning and administrative expenses provided for in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget to be made from the LMIHAF are necessary for the production, improvement and preservation of low- and moderate-income housing and directly relate to the projects and programs funded by the LMIHAF.

SECTION 2.The Housing Authority finds that the expenditure of LMIHAF monies outside the Redevelopment Project areas (Central and San Fernando) will be of benefit to the Redevelopment Project areas as the implementation of the Redevelopment Projects has and will continue to generate jobs in the Redevelopment Projects, thereby creating the need for programs throughout the City to increase the supply of affordable housing and improve and preserve the City’s existing affordable housing stock.

SECTION 3. The Housing Authority hereby adopts the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Housing Authority Budget as set forth and described in the Joint Report to the Housing Authority and City Council dated June 14, 2022.
115 of 117
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\JOINT_HACC_06142022_HA_Resolution_2b.pdf Adopted this _____ day of June, 2022.
______________________________
Chair
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Authority Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Aram Adjemian, Clerk of the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.______________was duly adopted by the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale, at a Joint Meeting of the Housing Authority and the Council of the City of Glendale held on the _______ day of ________________________, 2022, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________________________
Clerk of the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale
116 of 117
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Glendale\temp\JOINT_HACC_06142022_HA_Resolution_2c.pdf MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute an amendment to an existing professional services agreement (PSA) with Emphasys Software (C105966A) for a computer software license with maintenance and hosting of the Housing Authority Owner Portal. The amendment will amend the PSA to increase the contract amount by $77,418 for a new not-to-exceed amount of $486,425 and will to extend the term of the agreement for one year to end on August 31, 2023. The amendment shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
117 of 117