Agenda packet, first session — Glendale City Council, March 21, 2023 (part 1 of 2)

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings

are

broadcast

live

Glendale

TV,

viewable

Spectrum

Cable,

channel

and

AT&T

U-
verse,

channel

99. Meetings

are

also

streamed

live

high

definition

(HD)

the

city's

webpage,
glendaleca.gov/live
,

YouTube.com/myglendale
,

and

Apple

TV,

Roku,

and

Amazon

Fire
devices

using

free

app

called

Screenweave

and

choosing

“Glendale

TV”

from

the

menu.

Meetings
are

also

archived

the

City

Website

for

viewing

anytime

glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

Call

(818)
548-4013

for

program

schedules.

DVDs

the

proceedings

are

available

for

purchase

the

City
Clerk's

Office.

For

public

comments

and

questions

during

the

meeting,

call

(818)

937-8100.

Public
comments

specific

agenda

item

will

taken

when

that

agenda

item

discussed.

you

have
any

question

about

matters

the

agenda,

requests

for

assistance,

please

contact

the

City

Clerk
at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

least

48 hours

(or

two

business

days)

notice

required

for
requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and

Braille

transcription

services.

All

documents
related

open

session

items

this

agenda

that

are

received

less

than

72 hours

prior

this
meeting,

and

are

public

records,

will

available

for

review

the

Office

the

City

Clerk,

613

Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation

services

are

provided

for

meetings

through

the

use

bilingual

staff

for

speakers

who
wish

utilize

the

service

available.

Speakers

should

state

their

request

contacting

the

City
Clerk’s

office

(818)

548-2090,

least

24 hours

prior

the

scheduled

meeting.

Please

specify
the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

City

provided

interpreters

not
required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.

MARCH 21, 2023

REVISED
- ITEM 1C ADDED

ROLL CALL

1. CLOSED SESSION
– 1:00 PM ( To Commence at 3:00 PM
)
a.

Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: Nadimyan v. City of Glendale,

1 TYPED 3/17/2023 2:02:50 PM
03 21 23
CC

L.A.S.C. Case No. 19STCV29013
b.

Public Employment – Assistant City Attorney
c.

Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: Claim of Grigoryan, Claim No. 23-0142

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
– 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a.

Flag Salute: Mayor Ardy Kassakhian
b.

Invocation: Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
c.

Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 21, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on March 15, 2023 on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.

Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, March 28, 2023 b.

Appointment of Stephen Ryfle to the Los Angeles County Vector Control Commission (Kassakhian, 03/07/23)

4. CONSENT ITEMS
(Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a.

City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Special City Council and Regular City Council Meetings of March 7, 2023
b.

Fire Department, re: Annual Weed Abatement Program for 2023

1. Resolution declaring that noxious weeds on certain properties are a public nuisance; that the City intends to cause abatement by removal; that a hearing will be held on March 28, 2023 for objections to removal
c.

Glendale Water and Power, re:

Amendment of the Agreement with CDM
Constructors, Inc. for the Operation and Related Engineering Services for the Glendale Operable Unit for an Additional Five-Year Term

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute annual amendments with CDM Constructors, Inc., extending the existing agreement for the operation and related engineering services for the Glendale Operable Unit, for annual terms, for a total of five years
d.

Community Services and Parks, re:

Acceptance of Grant Funds from the
Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS) State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation (SAEEI) for the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB) and the Early Care Education Pathways to Success (ECEPTS)

1. Accept funds from the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards, State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation Grant (SAEEI) in the amount of $592,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 to implement the expansion of Early Care & Education Registered Apprenticeship program

2 TYPED 3/17/2023 2:02:50 PM
03 21 23
CC

2. Approve the award of SAEEI grant funds to the ECEPTS program, a project of The Tides Center, in the amount of $532,800 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 and to College & Career Engagement LLC, in the amount of $10,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025, as approved and recommended by the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB)

3. Authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.

Community Development, re: Ordinance Authorizing Entry into a Statutory Development Agreement between the City of Glendale and Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company in Connection with the Lucia Park Project (620 North Brand Boulevard and 625 North Maryland Avenue)

1. Ordinance for Development Agreement

8. ACTION ITEMS
a.

Community Services and Parks, re: Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing Execution of a Lease Agreement between the City of Glendale and Babak B.

Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 for a 3-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2026. b.

Glendale Water and Power, re: Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 8000616 with ARB, Inc. for Ongoing Grayson Site Mechanical and Field Service Support

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 8000616 with ARB, Inc. adding the amount of $180,000 to replenish the contract amount for the emergency service work provided to Unit No. 4 Boiler Waterwall Tube Cleaning at the Grayson Power Plant (GPP) c.

Glendale Water and Power, re: Grayson Repowering Project – Award of Demolition & Site Improvement Contract, and Amendments to Professional Services Agreements.

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with Silverado Contractors, Inc. (Silverado) for the Grayson Repowering Project - Demolition and Site Improvement, Request for Proposals Specification No. 3905 in the amount of $27,218,735, plus a twenty percent (20%) contingency in the amount of $5,443,747

2. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to the City’s existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Contract No. 8000053 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec), increasing the contract amount by $700,000 for additional “as needed” professional environmental support services for the Grayson Repowering Project for a new total contract not-to-exceed amount of $2,368,582

3. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to the City’s existing PSA with Black & Veatch Corporation (Black & Veatch) Contract No. 8000847, increasing the contract amount by $3,600,000 for additional “as needed” Owner’s Engineering services for the Grayson Repowering Project for a new total contract not-to-exceed amount of $6,373,068

3 TYPED 3/17/2023 2:02:50 PM
03 21 23
CC

4. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to the City’s existing PSA with Clean Power Consulting Partners (CP Squared) Contract No. 8000941, increasing the contract amount by $1,200,000 for additional “as needed” project management and consulting services for the Grayson Repowering Project for a new total contract not-to-exceed amount of $1,650,000.

5. Resolution of Appropriation
d.

City Clerk, re: City Council Resolution in Support of the Inclusion of an “Armenian” Checkbox Under the MENA Category in the 2030 U.S. Census. e.

City Attorney, re:

Revisions to Nomination and Selection Process for Boards and Commissions; Term Limits for Members of Boards and Commissions; Addition of Youth Commissioners to Arts & Culture Commission, Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission, and Transportation & Parking Commission

1. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Glendale Municipal Code Pertaining to Term Limits for Boards and Commissions and Youth Commissioners

2. Resolution Amending the Recruitment and Selection Process for Appointment of Individuals to Boards and Commissions

3. Resolution Amending the Procedure to Address Complaints or Allegations of Misconduct Against Members of Boards and Commissions

9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes.

Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision.

The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. ADJOURNMENT

4 TYPED 3/17/2023 2:02:50 PM
03 21 23
CC

5 of 224

6 of 224

1 4A

M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MARCH 7, 2023
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Hall Council Chambers, in said City, at 2:04 p.m. on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

March 7, 2023
Date
A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, March 7, 2023, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Development, re: Parklet Design and Installation for Downtown Glendale and Al Fresco Dining Program Guidelines for Private Parking Lots a. Motion approving parklet design for Downtown Glendale b. Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorizing the Purchasing Administrator to issue a Purchase Order/Service Authorization in an amount not-to exceed $400,000 with VX Design Solutions for the fabrication and installation of parklets in Downtown Glendale
c. Motion providing staff direction regarding Al Fresco Dining Program for Private Parking Lots
d. Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $146,000

2. City Attorney, re: Revisions to Nomination and Selection Process for Boards and Commissions; Term Limits for Members of Boards and Commissions; Addition of Youth Commissioners to Arts & Culture Commission, Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission, and Transportation & Parking Commission
a. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Glendale Municipal Code Pertaining to Term Limits for Boards and Commissions and Youth Commissioners b. Resolution Amending the Recruitment and Selection Process for Appointment of Individuals to Boards and Commissions
c. Resolution Amending the Procedure to Address Complaints or Allegations of Misconduct Against Members of Boards and Commissions

3. Community Services and Parks, re: Contract for Preparation of Design and Construction Documents for a Dog Park at Parking Lot 11, and a Feasibility Study of a Dog Park at Palmer Park, Brand Park, and Glendale Community College - Garfield Campus
a. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RJM Design Group, Inc. in the amount of $275,500 plus a 10 percent contingency of $27,550, for a total PSA amount not to exceed $303,050, to provide landscape architectural professional services for the design of a Dog Park at Parking Lot 11 and to conduct a Feasibility Study of a Dog Park at three (3) locations: Palmer Park, Brand Park, and Glendale Community College - Garfield Campus
b. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $266,750 in LA County Measure A Technical Assistance Program (TAP) funds to cover costs associated with the design/development of the Dog Park at Lot 11 and to conduct a Feasibility Study of a Dog Park at three (3) locations: Palmer Park, Brand Park, and Glendale Community 7 of 224

2 Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
Asatryan (recused)
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

College - Garfield Campus, and shift $40,000 in Development Impact Fees funds from the Dog Park at Lot 11 project to the Feasibility Study of a Dog Park project Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 p.m. March 1, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 p.m. March 1, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Paula Devine at 5:00 p.m. March 1, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 p.m. March 1, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 p.m. March 1, 2023 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 2:04 p.m.

ROLL CALL
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on Wednesday, March 1, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall

1.Community Development, re: Parklet Design and Installation for Downtown Glendale and Al Fresco Dining Program Guidelines for Private Parking Lots Presenting:

Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Allen Castillo, Principal Development Officer
Gillian Van Muyden, Chief Assistant City Attorney
Public Comment:

Stephen Meek
Asatryan left the chambers due to a possible conflict of interest and came back for item 3. a.Motion approving parklet design for Downtown Glendale b.Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorizing the Purchasing Administrator to issue a Purchase Order/Service Authorization in an amount not-to exceed $400,000 with VX Design Solutions for the fabrication and installation of parklets in Downtown Glendale
c.Motion providing staff direction regarding Al Fresco Dining Program for Private Parking Lots
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Devine
8 of 224

3 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
d.Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $146,000

2.City Attorney, re: Revisions to Nomination and Selection Process for Boards and Commissions; Term Limits for Members of Boards and Commissions; Addition of Youth Commissioners to Arts & Culture Commission, Parks, Recreation & Community Services Commission, and Transportation & Parking Commission This item is being moved to another date.
a.Introduction of Ordinance Amending Glendale Municipal Code Pertaining to Term Limits for Boards and Commissions and Youth Commissioners b.Resolution Amending the Recruitment and Selection Process for Appointment of Individuals to Boards and Commissions
c.Resolution Amending the Procedure to Address Complaints or Allegations of Misconduct Against Members of Boards and Commissions

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Gillian Van Muyden, Chief Asst. City Attorney
Presenting:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services and Parks a.Motion authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RJM Design Group, Inc. in the amount of $275,500 plus a 10 percent contingency of $27,550, for a total PSA amount not to exceed $303,050, to provide landscape architectural professional services for the design of a Dog Park at Parking Lot 11 and to conduct a Feasibility Study of a Dog Park at three (3) locations: Palmer Park, Brand Park, and Glendale Community College - Garfield Campus
b.Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $266,750 in LA County Measure A Technical Assistance Program (TAP) funds to cover costs associated with the design/development of the Dog Park at Lot 11 and to conduct a Feasibility Study of a Dog Park at three (3) locations: Palmer Park, Brand Park, and Glendale Community College - Garfield Campus, and shift $40,000 in Development Impact Fees funds from the Dog Park at Lot 11 project to the Feasibility Study of a Dog Park project a. Motion directing staff
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Devine
9 of 224

4 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
b. Resolution 23-25 to appropriate $60,000 for the feasibility study Moved: Brotman Seconded: Devine
ADJOURNMENT- 3:42 p.m.

Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
10 of 224

1 4A
Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MARCH 7, 2023
ROLL CALL – All Present

1. CLOSED SESSION – 3:42 p.m.
a. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: German Navarrete v. City of Glendale, et al., U.S.D.C. Case No. 2:22-cv-04372-SK Item 13a was read into the record. Council recessed to Closed Session at 3:44 p.m.

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:02 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Ardy Kassakhian
b. Invocation: Senior Pastor Todd Leonard of Glendale City Church c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 7, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on Wednesday, March 1, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, March 14, 2023 All regular meetings of have been cancelled and will resume on March 21, 2023. b. Proclamation designating March 2023 as Women’s History Month and March 8, 2023 as International Women’s Day
Diane Lambillotte and Armine Perian
c. Appointment of Roland Kedikian to the Glendale Water and Power Commission (Devine, 02/07/23)
d. Appointment of Daniel Paul to the Historic Preservation Commission (Brotman, 02/28/23)
e. Commendation for Library Assistant Grigor Zhamkochyan Director of Libraries Dr. Gary Shaffer
f. Commendation for Gyumri Artist Artak Tadevosyan
Kassakhian nominated Stephen Ryfle to the LA County Vector Control Commission. 11 of 224

2 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.

Item 4b pulled for separate consideration.
a.City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of February 28, 2023 Moved: Najarian Seconded: Devine
b.Public Works, re: Plans and Specification for the Community Beautification Project
Staff Comment:

Yazdan Emrani, Director of Public Works

1. Resolution 23-18 adopting the Plans and Specification for the Community Beautification Project, Specification No. 3849, and directing the City Clerk to Advertise for Bids
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
c.Libraries, Arts, and Culture, re: Acceptance of Grant Funds for eBooks For All

1.Motion accepting $40,000 in Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) grant program funds from the California State Library‘s eBooks for All program; and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Devine

2.Resolution 23-19 appropriating $40,000 from the California State Library‘s Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) eBooks for All grant program as well as shifting $10,000 from the Library Fund for the 25% local match requirement Moved: Najarian Seconded: Devine
12 of 224

3 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
d.Public Works, re: Central Library Roof Replacement Project

1.Resolution 23-20 adopting Plans and Specification No. 3942 for the Central Library Roof Replacement Project and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Devine

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
Councilmember Devine requested that staff ensure that electric vehicle charging stations are installed in the Montrose Area and the Northern Glendale. City Manager Golanian indicated that staff has been working on installing charging stations, primarily on Lot 3 north of Honolulu and the Montrose Shopping Park area.

Councilmember Brotman attended the opening of the exhibit called “Lightning’s Lung” by artist Oliver Nowlin at the Museum of Neon Art. The exhibit will run through August 27, 2023.

He also attended the opening of a new play called “Love and Information” at the Antaeus Theatre. The play will run through April 3, 2023. Additionally, Brotman attended an event hosted by GALAS (Gay and Lesbian Armenian Society) at the Glendale Central Library. At the event, the attendees heard from Lilit Martirosyan, a transgender activist, who talked about her struggle against transphobia and homophobia in Armenia. While attending an event by the Gay Man’s Chorus of Los Angeles (GMCLA), Brotman learned that the group is being kicked-out of the Glendale Alex Theatre and asked staff to investigate this issue.

Devine seconded. Golanian indicated that he was told by staff that Alex Theatre is renegotiating the contract with the GMCLA. Director of Community Development Bradley Calvert indicated that SAS Entertainment manages the Alex Theatre and has had a policy in place that resident companies do not necessarily perform. He stated that SAS is working on the contract so that moving forward, GMCLA will not be classified as a resident company, but will be given a different title and will receive preferential treatment.

Councilmember Najarian stated that the Alex Theatre put on an excellent show for Artsakh with the Children of Armenia Fund and commended Miles Williams, Founder and President of SAS Entertainment, for a well-attended event.

Mayor Kassakhian thanked Mayor Pro Tem Najarian for running the meeting last week when he was out on city business. He and GWP staff attended the 2023 Legislative Rally, hosted by the American Public Power Association, where important issues were discussed such as the ones facing public utilities and to ensure that funds from the Inflation Reduction Act can be used and be beneficial for utilities nationwide. Some of the topics Kassakhian and GWP staff shared about were the city’s clean energy goals, updates on local projects and goals and ways to meet the SB-100 goals by year 2035 (ahead of year 2045). They also shared about how Glendale has been a leader in procuring clean energy resources, energy affordability, and addressing supply chain issues. Kassakhian congratulated the Glendale Latino Association (GLA) for a well-attended event and was honored to be the recipient of the “Man of the Year” award. He thanked the GLA for all the work they do for the community and urged anyone who wants to make donations to their organization to do so and help fund scholarships for Latino youth in the city. Kassakhian thanked and congratulated the Glendale Libraries for a well-attended inaugural book festival. He announced it was the kick-off of the little league season at Brand Park and wished everyone 13 of 224

4 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
who is playing to have a great season. Kassakhian congratulated Glendale Beautiful for a well-attended Arbor Day event at the Casa Adobe. He mentioned that Laura Stotler, a former Principal Planner of the City of Glendale, talked about the heritage of the city and its zoning policies.

City Clerk Abajian announced that a new draft questionnaire for the 2030 Census was recently released by the Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB). In the new proposed census questionnaire, the old racial and ethnic categories have been revamped and new categories are proposed. One of those new categories is the MENA category that includes subcategories such as Lebanese, Syrian, Iranian, etc. Previously these populations, including Armenians, were subsumed under the “white” racial category. This no longer will be the case. Abajian stated that the City of Glendale is home to the largest concentration of Armenians in the US and currently lacks comprehensive and meaningful data on its Armenian population. The Armenian population is largely absent from federal data and the lack of visibility in data has large ramifications for the Armenian community of Glendale including receiving services, funding, and support on issues spanning from housing, healthcare, business, to educational access. She stated she has been volunteering on a taskforce with ANCA Western Region to get public comments submitted on the draft 2030 Census questionnaire asking the OMB to include an Armenian checkbox under the MENA category by the April 12th deadline for public comments. She requested that Council pass a resolution in support of the inclusion of an Armenian checkbox under the MENA category so that it could be submitted as a statement of support to the OMB. Najarian asked that the resolution be put on the Council agenda and Asatryan seconded.

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)
Cathy Morfopoulos
Halsey Wickser
Lauren Perreau
Malcolm Johnson
Ramella Eraghi

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.City Attorney, re: ORDINANCE 6002 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE REMOVING SECTION 10.36.100 AND AMENDING SECTION 10.36.140 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, TO REMOVE PARKING PERMITS FOR

COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND TO UPDATE PARKING PERMIT FEES FOR LARGE VEHICLES, BOATS, AND PERSONAL WATERCRAFT (Devine, 02/28/23) Moved: Brotman Seconded: Devine

1.Resolution 23-21 amending the Citywide Fee Schedule to match provisions of Chapter

10.36 as amended
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Devine
14 of 224

5 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Agenda out of order. Item 9a read next.

8. ACTION ITEMS
a. Public Works, re: Fremont Park Renovation Project Bids, Specification 3624 Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Miah Yun, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Presenting:

Kevin Todd, Asst. Director of PW
Public Comment:

Giulliano Prieto

1. Resolution 23-22 rejecting all bids received on January 11, 2023, dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the Director of Public Works or his designee to negotiate a contract with one or more of the contractors that submitted bids Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

2. Motion Amending the Professional Services Agreement with David Volz Design Landscaping Architects, Inc., (DVD) increasing the contract in the amount of $149,596.00 for a new total not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,254,473.00 and extending the contract duration until the completion of the project
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

3. Motion Amending the Professional Services Agreement with Maestro Development, LLC (Maestro) increasing the contract in the amount of $190,000.00 for a new total not-to-exceed contract amount of $855,000.00 and extending the contract duration until the completion of the project Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
b. Glendale Water and Power, re: Standardization of water meter boxes/vaults, covers, inserts, and related items for the enclosure of water meters as Armorcast Products Company (Armorcast)
Staff Comment:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
15 of 224

6 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Presenting:

Michael De Ghetto, Chief Asst. General Manager of GWP
Public Comment:

Giulliano Prieto

1.Resolution 23-23 adopting Armorcast as the City-standard for water meter boxes and vaults for the enclosure of water meters and dispense with competitive bidding for the procurement of water meter boxes, vaults, covers, inserts, and related items from Armorcast
Moved: Devine Seconded: Brotman
c. Glendale Water and Power, re: Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement (Contract No. 8000586) with NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Craig Kuennen, Assistant General Manager/Business Services

1.Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement (Contract No. 8000586) with NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC. to extend the agreement through December 31, 2023, and increase the contract amount by $148,300, plus a 10% contingency of $14,830 to a new not to exceed total of $347,800 to provide Complete Financial Forecast, Rate Recommendations and Cost of Service Analysis Model Update, and provide for subsequent development of optional "Op-Out" TOU Model and Rate Recommendations for future consideration
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
d. Glendale Water and Power, re: Prepare a Request for Proposal using the Alternative Project Delivery Method for the Engineer-Procure-Construct of City- owned PV Solar Projects – Phase 1
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Craig Kuennen, Assistant General Manager/Business Services Presenting:

Bryan Salazar, Administrative Analyst/ Electrical Engineering Public Comments:

Giulliano Prieto
16 of 224

7 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Mike Borisov
Jackie Gish
Monica Campagna

1.Resolution 23-24 authorizing the General Manager of GWP, or his designee, to prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) using the Alternative Project Delivery Method for the Engineer-Procure-Construct (EPC) of Solar PV Systems at the following proposed project sites: 1) Glendale Sports Complex Parking Lot, 2) Montrose Parking Lot 3, 3) Utility Operations Parking Lot, 4) Brand Landfill, 5) Fire Station 21, 6) Glendale Central Library, 7) GWP Perkins Building, and 8) Dunsmore Park Parking Lot, and authorizing the City Clerk to solicit proposals Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan

9. HEARINGS
a. Community Development, re: Appeal of the Director of Community Development’s determination related to Design Review Case No. PDR-000210-2022 and Environmental Information Form Case No. PEIF-000280-2022 that the preparation of an EIR is required to review and assess the proposed project that includes demolition of the existing stable and accessory buildings located at 1900 Riverside Drive in conjunction with the development of new kennel and stable buildings, a new corral, a new accessory building, and associated parking Hearing opened at 7:09 p.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Gillian Van Muyden, Chief Asst. City Attorney
Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Jay Platt, Principal Planner
Presenting:

Vista Ezzati, Sr. Planner
Public Comments:

Rene Karabedian, Appellate
Carrie Chasteen, Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

Richard Dell, Architect
Emily Gabel Luddy
Michael Elric
Jay Geisenheimer
Ramella Eraghi
Lisa Baca
Liz Radley
Joanne Hedge
James DeCarli
Elizabeth Bour
17 of 224

8 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

1.Motion to sustain the CEQA determination made by the Director of Community Development to require an EIR

2.Motion to reverse the CEQA determination made by the Director of Community Development to require an EIR
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan

10. REPORTS – INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes. Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision. The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

Michael Belzer
Giulliano Prieto
Allen Dish

13. NEW BUSINESS
a. Motion to take action on an item that arose after the posting of the agenda for the March 7, 2023 City Council Meeting. The item in question involves the need to discuss possible resolution of a lawsuit which has been filed and is pending. After the posting of the agenda, the City Attorney’s office determined it may need authority from Council to make and consider offers to resolve the litigation. This discussion and direction to the City Attorney must be considered by the Council as the window for possible settlement will likely close or range of options will be limited if the matter is not discussed between now and the next regular Council meeting on March 21, 2023. The name of the case is unspecified as same would jeopardize existing settlement negotiations.

Moved: Najarian Seconded: Brotman

14. ADJOURNMENT – 10:24 p.m.

Moved: Brotman Seconded: Najarian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
18 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Annual Weed Abatement Program for 2023

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Fire Department Vegetation Management Program includes 9,559 parcels within the very high fire hazard area that receive an annual inspection. Of those, 616 are unimproved, vacant properties. The City has an agreement with Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner for weed abatement services on those unimproved properties.

The City Council annually reviews and approves the resolution declaring noxious weeds on unimproved properties can constitute a public nuisance in order to permit the County Agricultural Commissioner to work within the City. This action also sets a public hearing date to allow affected property owners to voice their concerns. 19 of 224

24b
3 9
2 5

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the attached resolution declaring that certain noxious weeds located on property within City jurisdictional areas constitute a public nuisance; that the City intends to cause abatement; and that the City establishes a public hearing date of March 28, 2023.

BACKGROUND
This program is a part of the ongoing Vegetation Management Program administered by the Fire Department that includes a combination of hazard abatement conducted by private landowners, contractors, and the County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office. It is understood that all costs related to abatement will be charged to the property owner affected and will become a part of their tax liability.

The Fire Department, along with Agricultural Commissioner inspectors, conducts inspections to determine if a hazard exists and requests the Commissioner to carry out abatement. The Commissioner recovers the cost of abatement through assessment as permitted under Article II, Chapter 13, Part II, Division 3, Title 4 of Government Code of the State of California.

ANALYSIS
The City of Glendale has a five-year agreement (2022-2027) with the County of Los Angeles for weed abatement services, which is carried out by the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner. The Commissioner develops a list each year of properties in the City of Glendale that contain noxious weeds considered to be a public nuisance. All unimproved parcels in the city are inspected annually and placed on the list if they present an actual or potential fire hazard that is within 100 feet of a structure. This year’s list includes 616 properties. The list is submitted to the City along with a resolution, declaring the weeds a hazard and public nuisance.

After passing the resolution, the County Agricultural Commissioner is thereby designated to act on behalf of the City to abate the hazards. The City is required to provide notice of the abatement action and the date which affected property owners may address concerns to the City Council. The notices will be mailed by the County at least ten days prior to March 21, 2023. By approving the attached resolution, the date of March 28, 2023 is set for a public hearing whereby property owners may be heard to voice their concerns regarding the Declaration List.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The stakeholders include the owners of the 616 properties identified in the attached declaration list. A notice will be mailed to the property owners informing them of the program.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.
20 of 224

34b
3 9
2 5

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
N/A

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Private hazard abatement vendors may be contracted with by the City of Glendale to provide the aforementioned services. This alternative would require the City to assume the lead role in key program tasks including notification, inspection and cost recovery, thereby increasing the direct cost for the City.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Foster McLean, Fire Marshal
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: 2023 Glendale Dec List

21 of 224

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE DECLARING

THAT WEEDS, BRUSH, RUBBISH AND REFUSE UPON OR IN FRONT OF SPECIFIED

PROPERTY IN THE CITY ARE A SEASONAL AND RECURRENT PUBLIC NUISANCE, AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ABATEMENT THEREOF.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

BE IT RESOLVED THAT, pursuant to the provisions of Title 4, Division 3, Part 2, Chapter 13, Article 2, of the California Government Code, Sections 39560 to 39588, inclusive, and evidence received by it, the City Council of the City of Glendale specifically finds:

SECTION 1. That the weeds, brush or rubbish growing or existing upon the streets, sidewalks, or private property in the city attain such large growth as to become, when dry, a fire menace to adjacent improved property, or which are otherwise noxious, dangerous, or a public nuisance.

SECTION 2. That the presence of dry grass, stubble, refuse, or other flammable materials are conditions which endanger the public safety by creating a fire hazard.

SECTION 3. That by reason of the foregoing fact, the weeds, brush, rubbish, dry grass, stubble, refuse, or other flammable material growing or existing upon the private property hereinafter described, and upon the streets and sidewalks in front of said property constitute a seasonal and recurrent public nuisance and should be abated as such.

SECTION 4. That the private property, together with the streets and sidewalks in front of same herein referred to, is more particularly described as follows, to wit: That certain property described in the attached list hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as though set forth in full at this point.

22 of 224

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, pursuant to the findings of fact, by this Council heretofore made, that the weeds, brush, rubbish, dry grass, stubble, refuse, or other flammable material in and upon and in front of the real property hereinbefore described constitute and are hereby declared to be a seasonal and recurrent public nuisance which should be abated. The Agricultural Commissioner/Director of Weights and Measures, County of Los Angeles, is hereby designated the person to give notice to destroy said weeds, brush, rubbish, dry grass, stubble, refuse, or other flammable material and shall cause notices to be given to each property owner by United States Mail and said notice shall be substantially in the following form to wit.

NOTICE TO DESTROY WEEDS,

REMOVE BRUSH, RUBBISH AND REFUSE

Notice is hereby given that on March 21, 2023, the City Council of the City of Glendale passed or will pass a resolution declaring noxious or dangerous vegetation including weeds, brush, tumbleweeds, sagebrush, and chaparral or rubbish and refuse were growing or occurring upon or in front of said property on certain streets in said city or unincorporated area of the County of Los Angeles, and more particularly described in the resolution, and that they constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by the removal of said noxious or dangerous vegetation, rubbish and refuse. The resolution further declares that, if not abated, the vegetation and/or rubbish and refuse may be removed and the nuisance abated by County authorities in which case the cost of removal shall be assessed upon the land from or in front of which the noxious or dangerous vegetation, rubbish and refuse are removed. Such cost will constitute a special assessment against such lots or lands. Reference is hereby made to said resolution for further particulars. In addition, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles authorized and directed the Agricultural Commissioner to recover its costs of details. All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of noxious or dangerous vegetation, rubbish and refuse and the recovery of inspection costs, are hereby notified that they may attend a hearing of the City Council of said city to be held at 613 E. Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206, in the Council Chambers on March 28, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. where their objections will be heard and given due consideration. If the property owner does not want to present objections to the proposed removal of the noxious or dangerous vegetation including weeds, brush, tumbleweeds, sagebrush, and chaparral or rubbish and refuse, or the recovery of inspection costs, the owner need not appear at the above mentioned hearing.

___________________________________________________________ City Clerk of the City of Glendale

23 of 224

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the Agricultural Commissioner is hereby authorized and directed to recover its costs of inspection of the properties hereinabove described in a manner consistent with prior action of the Board adopting a fee schedule for such inspections. The recovery of these costs is vital to the ongoing operation governing the identification and abatement of those properties that constitute a seasonal and recurrent public nuisance and endanger the public safety.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the 28th day of March, 2023, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. of said day is the day and hour, and the Meeting Room of the City Council of the City of Glendale in the City Hall in the City of Glendale is fixed by this City Council as the place when and where any and all property owners having any objections to the aforesaid proposed removal of weeds, brush, rubbish, dry grass, stubble, refuse, or other flammable material may appear before the City Council and show cause why said weeds, brush, rubbish, dry grass, stubble, refuse, or other flammable material should not be removed in accordance with this resolution, and said objections will then and there be heard and given due consideration; and

BE IT RESOLVED THAT the notices to destroy weeds, brush, rubbish, dry grass, stubble, refuse or other flammable material hereinbefore referred to shall be mailed by said Agricultural Commissioner/Director of Weights and Measures at least ten days prior to March 28, 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______day of __________________ 2023

________________________________________

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

ATTEST:

BY ____________________________________________________

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

24 of 224

ABATEMENT ORDER March 28, 2023

FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD MARCH 28, 2023, IN THE MATTER OF

RESOLUTION TO ABATE NOXIOUS WEEDS, RUBBISH, AND REFUSE, THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, BY MOTION ADOPTED AN ORDER

DIRECTING THE AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF WEIGHTS AND

MEASURES TO ABATE THE NUISANCE BY HAVING THE WEEDS, RUBBISH, AND REFUSE REMOVED.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GLENDALE

BY___________________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

BY_______________________________________________

CITY CLERK

25 of 224

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)
) SS
)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)

ADRIAN ZAVALA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, BUREAU CHIEF, AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER/WEIGHTS AND MEASURES, being first duly sworn says: That on or before the 1st day of February 2023, as required by the Government Code of the State of California, he notified by United States Mail the owners of each of the properties described in the attached list a notice or notices to destroy noxious or dangerous weeds, of which the annexed is a true copy, and setting the 28th day of March, 2023, as the date upon which owners of said property could attend a meeting of the Council of the City of Glendale, when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.

_____________________________________

ADRIAN ZAVALA
Deputy Director, Bureau Chief

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME

This ______day of ___________________, 2023

___________________________________________
City Clerk

26 of 224

Kurt E. Floren
Agricultural Commissioner
Director of Weights and Measures

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Department of
Agricultural Commissioner/
Weights and Measures

12300 Lower Azusa Road
Arcadia, CA 91006-5872
http://acwm.lacounty.gov

Protecting Consumers
and the Environment
Since 1881

Protecting Consumers and the Environment Since 1881
To Enrich Lives Through Effective and Caring Service
October 31, 2022 -REVISED-

The Honorable City Council
City of Glendale
613 East Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206

ATTENTION: CITY CLERK

Listed below are the proposed dates for the delivery, adoption, and protest hearing of our Annual Weed Abatement Declaration List and Resolution. The adoption of resolution, public hearing and mailing dates will appear on the annual notices mailed to the property owners.

Resolution and Declaration List Deliver Date: January 5, 2023 (Thursday) Resolution Adoption Date: March 21, 2023 (Tuesday)
Public Hearing Date: March 28, 2023 (Tuesday)

If you find these dates to be agreeable with your council and calendar, please confirm by signing and returning a copy of this letter to [email protected], no later than November 15, 2022.

The Annual Weed Abatement Notices and Response Cards will be approved for printing on November 17 th and your meeting dates cannot be changed after that date. Any consideration in placing our item early on your agenda would be appreciated.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (626) 575-5487.

Very truly yours,

ADRIAN ZAVALA __________________________
Deputy Director, Bureau Chief Confirmation – Please sign Weed Hazard & Integrated Pest Management
__________________________
Please Print Name

MYRNA MADRID
Staff Assistant III
Weed Hazard & Integrated Pest Management __________________________ Date
AZ:mm

11/07/2022
Suzie Abajian
27 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIP
5459 019 012 VINCENT WAY 29TH STREET STUDENT HOUSING LLC 1911 UPPERTON AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5459 020 017 MARION DR BRAVO,ROMEL 3172 VERDUGO PL LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5459 020 018 MARION DR BRAVO,ROMEL 3172 VERDUGO PL LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5601 032 030 MARKRIDGE RD ANANDA ASHRAMA PO BOX 8555 LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5601 032 900 3100 MARKRIDGE RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5601 032 901 3100 MARKRIDGE RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5601 033 020 COOKS CYN LOH INVESTMENT LP 3870 MURPHY CANYON RD STE 150 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 5601 033 021 COOKS CYN ARIES HOLDINGS LLC 413 CANYON GREENS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89144 5601 033 901 MARKRIDGE RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5601 033 902 MARKRIDGE RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5601 036 020 MARKRIDGE RD TRACT 42836 HOMEOWNER ASSN 3501 JAMBOREE RD STE 2000 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 5601 037 035 SKY RIDGE DR TRACT 42836 HOMEOWNER ASSN 3501 JAMBOREE RD STE 2000 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 5601 038 009 SKY RIDGE DR TRACT 42836 HOMEOWNER ASSN 3501 JAMBOREE RD STE 2000 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 5603 011 004 EL CAMINITO WEST,MICHAEL M AND ALICE G 3835 EL CAMINITO LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 020 003 NEW YORK AVE FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 020 004 NEW YORK AVE FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 021 001 CANYON LANE MONTGOMERY,ROBERT P AND CYNTHIA L 3861 EL LADO DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5607 021 002 CANYON LANE MONTGOMERY,ROBERT P AND CYNTHIA L 3861 EL LADO DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5607 021 003 CANYON LANE FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 021 006 CELITA HWY BEVERLY PALM PROPERTIES INC 269 S BEVERLY DR STE 1194 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212 5607 021 008 CELITA HWY STEUART,STEVEN O TR 1913 VERDUGO LOMA DR APT 1 GLENDALE CA 91208 5607 021 009 CELITA HWY TAN, SACHA TR 440 S CANON DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212 5607 021 034 CELITA HWY M JORJEZIAN INVESTMENTS INC 17425 CHATSWORTH ST 202 GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 PARCEL
1 28 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5607 022 001 CELITA HWY STANWYCK,RUTH G DECD EST OF 738 S UNION AVE NO 303 LOS ANGELES CA 90017 5607 022 003 CELITA HWY MCLEMORE,KENNETH S AND ELISABETH C 4 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK GLENDALE CA 91214 5607 022 005 CELITA HWY MCLEMORE,KENNETH S AND ELISABETH C 4 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK GLENDALE CA 91214 5607 022 008 CELITA HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 018 CELITA HWY SCHWARTZ,KAREN M TR PO BOX 4276 ORANGE CA 92863 5607 022 022 CELITA HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 023 MIGOR LANE FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 024 FERN LANE BERTRAM,JOYCE L TR 12 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK GLENDALE CA 91214 5607 022 025 MIGOR LANE BERTRAM,JOYCE L TR 12 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK GLENDALE CA 91214 5607 022 027 FERN LANE MATHERS, NOAH 10 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 022 028 MIGOR LANE SANTOS,MIRIAM 5643 SMILEY DR LOS ANGELES CA 90016 5607 022 032 FERN LANE LOPEZ,HECTOR 13421 GLADSTONE AVE SYLMAR CA 91342 5607 022 034 FERN LANE FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 035 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 042 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 043 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 044 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 045 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 046 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 047 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 048 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 049 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 2 29 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5607 022 050 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 051 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 054 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 055 VERDUGO WOODS HWY ARROYO, CHAYANNE 345 E 20TH ST UNIT 2 LONG BEACH CA 90806 5607 022 056 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 022 057 VERDUGO WOODS HWY ARROYO, CHAYANNE 345 E 20TH ST UNIT 2 LONG BEACH CA 90806 5607 023 001 VERDUGO WOODS HWY BALISY, HUSAM S CO TR 521 KNIGHT WAY LA CANADA CA 91011 5607 023 003 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 023 004 VERDUGO WOODS HWY MARUTYAN, ARMEN AND AVA M 725 OMAR ST GLENDALE CA 91202 5607 023 006 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 023 009 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 023 010 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 023 014 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 024 007 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 024 015 VERDUGO WOODS HWY GUZMAN,HECTOR AND
GUZMAN,MARGARET 1105 W CLARK AVE APT C BURBANK CA 91506 5607 024 016 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 024 019 SEINA LANE FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 024 021 SEINA LANE VELASCO,JOSEPHINE F 23219 ORCHARD AVE CARSON CA 90745 5607 024 022 SEINA LANE CASTRO,ELOY AND EULALIA 4301 BERENICE AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90031 5607 024 023 VERDUGO WOODS HWY LEE,AARON AND DELSENIA 6726 ALVERN ST LOS ANGELES CA 90056 5607 024 025 VERDUGO WOODS HWY ISHKANIAN,THOMAS S TR 11 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 024 030 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 3 30 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5607 025 001 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 025 002 VERDUGO WOODS HWY BARTON,DAVID L AND PATRICIA G 17 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 025 003 VERDUGO WOODS HWY ABOUJAOUDE,PIERRE 3276 KENNETH DR LOS ANGELES CA 90032 5607 025 008 MOUNTAIN OAKS DR MAUPIN, ELLLA M TR 6828 BECKETT ST TUJUNGA CA 91042 5607 025 010 VERDUGO WOODS HWY LAUGHREY,FRED E AND SUSAN L TRS 2405 TEASLEY ST LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 025 013 VERDUGO WOODS HWY WILSON,PAMILLA J PO BOX 3326 SEWARD AK 99664 5607 025 014 VERDUGO WOODS HWY LAUGHREY,FRED E AND SUSAN L TRS 2405 TEASLEY ST LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 025 015 VERDUGO WOODS HWY WILSON,PAMILLA J PO BOX 3326 SEWARD AK 99664 5607 025 016 VERDUGO WOODS HWY WILSON,PAMILLA J PO BOX 3326 SEWARD AK 99664 5607 025 021 VERDUGO WOODS HWY MARTIN,GREG AND DIANNE H 1 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 025 023 VERDUGO WOODS HWY CHEESEMAN,JOHN 9 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 025 024 VERDUGO WOODS HWY CHEESEMAN,JOHN 9 MOUNTAIN OAKS PARK LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5607 025 025 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 025 026 VERDUGO WOODS HWY FORTNER,JIMMIE D ET AL TRS 918 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5607 026 010 VERDUGO LANE GILMORE,BYRON D&ISABELLA H PO BOX 31490 PHOENIX AZ 85046 5610 002 020 MONTROSE AVE COOPER, NORMA G TR 2015 MONTROSE AVE MONTROSE CA 91020 5610 002 021 MONTROSE AVE COOPER, NORMA G TR 2015 MONTROSE AVE MONTROSE CA 91020 5610 002 902 PENNSYLVANIA AVE LA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5610 029 060 MONTROSE AVE CHIU, IVAN W TR 2300 COOLEY PL PASADENA CA 91104 5611 009 070 ROSELAWN AVE ALEXANIANS,HAIK AND 1601 WABASSO WAY GLENDALE CA 91208 5611 010 024 HALL'S CANYON CHANNEL URQUIDEZ, WILLIAM J ET AL 917 MEADOWDALE CIR GARLAND TX 75043 5613 015 003 MENLO DR KHATCHATURIAN,RAFIK M ET AL TRS 1007 S CENTRAL AVE 100 GLENDALE CA 91204 4 31 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5613 016 027 MENLO DR REGANYAN, NORO M 17164 DONMETZ ST GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 5613 017 017 EL TOVAR DR MAPP,JOHN AND MARIA 3180 VISTA DEL MAR DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 018 007 SPARR BLVD TREMAYNE,KENNETH & AZUMAKO TRS 3141 MENLO DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 020 012 VERDUGO RD HYUN SOON SUH AND 207 DONG 701HO 92CHUNWANG-RO GUR SEOUL KOREA 152-130 99999 5613 020 013 VERDUGO RD HARRIS,KENTON W 1714 ARLINGTON AVE GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 023 005 BAYBERRY DR MOZILO, ERIC R AND TERRI M TRS 2020 EL ARBOLITA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 023 006 BAYBERRY DR MOZILO, ERIC R AND TERRI M TRS 2020 EL ARBOLITA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 023 007 BAYBERRY DR SHAINMAN,ROBERT L AND KARIN 220 NEWPORT CENTER DR STE 11 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 5613 023 008 BAYBERRY DR SHAINMAN,ROBERT L AND KARIN 220 NEWPORT CENTER DR 11-570 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 5613 023 009 BAYBERRY DR WOO,CANDICE L 2050 EL ARBOLITA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 023 034 BAYBERRY DR DICKINSON,DAVID G TR 13664 DERRING DR CORAL GABLES FL 33158 5613 024 017 AMARILLO DR ELIADES, BARBARA J TR 2057 EL ARBOLITA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 024 018 AMARILLO DR PRYOR, WILLIAMS AND 2033 EL ARBOOLITA DR GLENDALE CA 99320 5613 024 019 AMARILLO DR JACOBSON,LLOYD AND JENNIFER TRS 82 ALASKA PL FRIDAY HARBOR WA 98250 5613 024 022 AMARILLO DR IZZARD,ALEXANDER E III CO TR 2024 MONTECITO DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 024 041 AMARILLO DR JAVADIAN,VACHIK AND 3108 PADDINGTON RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5613 024 043 AMARILLO DR ELIADES, BARBARA J TR 2057 EL ARBOLITA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5613 026 001 BAYBERRY DR SARKISSIAN,CARNIG A 4210 GAYLE DR TARZANA CA 91356 5613 026 002 BAYBERRY DR HERTZ,MICHAEL A PO BOX 3807 GLENDALE CA 91221 5613 026 003 BAYBERRY DR MARQUETTE,JEANNE 412 GLENNEYRE ST LAGUNA BEACH CA 92651 5613 026 014 BAYBERRY DR DASSIAN,SAIFOLLAH S 2233 RAFAEL TER GLENDALE CA 91208 5614 015 029 LA VISTA TER TSARUKYAN, ARIS 8441 GRENOBLE ST SUNLAND CA 91040 5 32 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5614 015 030 LA VISTA TER TSARUKYAN, ARIS 8441 GRENOBLE ST SUNLAND CA 91040 5614 016 007 LA VISTA TER TSARUKYAN, ARIS 8441 GRENOBLE ST SUNLAND CA 91040 5614 025 053 HILLSIDE DR LETHIN,CLARKE AND WENDY 1310 HILLSIDE DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5616 002 801 COUNTRY CLUB DR SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5616 008 005 BEAUDRY TER SOO MI KIM 12027 PARAMOUNT BLVD DOWNEY CA 90242 5616 009 003 HERMOSITA DR ALLEN, LOIS N 721 N ISABEL ST APT 9 GLENDALE CA 91206 5616 019 011 DORA VERDUGO RD HO,WILLIAM K AND SUNEE K PO BOX 9454 GLENDALE CA 91226 5616 021 036 ESPERANZA TER LIU,CHANG H 14429 VICTORY BLVD VAN NUYS CA 91401 5617 012 027 CELITA HWY SARIAN,ARSEN J AND LIZA TRS 28241 BAKERTON AVE CANYON COUNTRY CA 91351 5617 012 029 SUMMIT LANE KARAMANOUKIAN,ALBER K TR 2226 HOLLISTER TER GLENDALE CA 91206 5617 014 037 LOCKERBIE CT OMIDGHAEMI, MOHAMMAD 3817 LOCKERBIE CT GLENDALE CA 91208 5617 019 800 MESA LILA RD SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5617 023 033 EILINTA AVE KNOX,CHESTER AND DOLORES TRS 900 EILINITA AVE GLENDALE CA 91208 5618 022 004 1759 ALLEN AVE NORHADIAN,ARMEN CO TR 1759 ALLEN AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5618 022 902 ALLEN AVE L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5618 023 014 VISTA DR RENFRO,HAL D AND SHEENA TRS 220 S JACKSON ST NO 307 GLENDALE CA 91205 5618 023 015 VISTA DR RENFRO,HAL D AND SHEENA TRS 220 S JACKSON ST NO 307 GLENDALE CA 91205 5618 025 006 FOOTHILL DR SIMHAEE, ENAYAT 410 S BARRINGTON AVE UNIT 303 LOS ANGELES CA 90049 5618 026 001 FOOTHILL DR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CANDLE 2021 N SAN FERNANDO RD LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5618 028 901 ALLEN AVE L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5621 035 007 GLENOAKS BLVD ZYGOMA LLC 1500 PASEO DE ORO PACIFIC PALIS. CA 90272 5626 007 005 RIVERSIDE DR DARGENZIO, LOUIS AND CATHERINE 624 N FREDERIC ST BURBANK CA 91505 6 33 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5626 026 270 FAIRFIELD ST LA CITY DEPT OF WATER & POWER PO BOX 51111 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 5627 014 011 532 HAZEL ST HAZEL COLE INVESTMENT LLC PO BOX 35148 LOS ANGELES CA 90035 5630 003 030 MONTAIN ST DULGERYAN, KEVORK G AND 1011 W MOUNTAIN ST GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 003 036 RIDGEWAY DR GRIGORYAN,SATENIK 1875 IDLEWOOD RD GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 009 023 ROBIN GLEN DR ARD EEVIN PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 3538 GLENDALE CA 91221 5630 010 037 CALEB ST BAGHRAMIAN,ARMOND M AND FIMA S 2315 MONTROSE AVE NO 101 MONTROSE CA 91020 5630 010 056 HILLCREST AVE AMIRKHANIAN,VAHIK AND HASMIK TRS 550 CALEB ST GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 010 900 CALEB ST L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5630 010 901 HILLCREST AVE L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5630 011 025 HILLCREST AVE KARAPETYAN, ARPINE 1544 W KENNETH RD GLENDALE CA 91201 5630 011 027 ROHR ST B AND J CAPITAL GROUP INVESTMENTS 511 CAMINO REAL REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 5630 011 028 HILLCREST AVE MORALES, BRIAN J AND 2106 S BENTLEY AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90025 5630 011 030 VALENTINE DR ROACH,JOSEPH A III AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 011 031 VALENTINE DR ROACH,JOSEPH A III AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 011 032 VALENTINE DR ROACH,JOSEPH A AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 011 033 VALENTINE DR KHATCHATOURIAN, ALAN TR 879 W MOUNTAIN ST. GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 011 035 VALENTINE DR HARTOUNIAN, MATILDA 2706 N KENNETH RD BURBANK CA 91504 5630 011 038 VALENTINE DR COX, PAUL J AND 1758 ROHR ST GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 017 024 MAGINN DR NGUYEN,TOAN VY CO TR 935 HERON CIR SEAL BEACH CA 90740 5630 022 001 VALENTINE DR ROACH,JOSEPH A AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 006 VALENTINE DR WITTERT,TERRY L 23306 PARK SORRENTO CALABASAS CA 91302 5630 022 007 VALENTINE DR VALLEY CASA LLC 23901 CALABASAS RD STE 1050 CALABASAS CA 91302 7 34 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5630 022 009 VALENTINE DR GARDNER,BRIAN R 100 W GLENOAKS BLVD GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 011 NOLAN AVE CHEGENIZADEH,ABDUL K AND 7 BUCKSKIN CT BELL CANYON CA 91307 5630 022 015 NESMUTH RD BABAYANS, ALFRED AND ANAHID 4609 OCEAN VIEW BLVD LA CANADA FLINT CA 91011 5630 022 017 NOLAN AVE MONKARSH, JOYCE L ET AL TRS ET AL 9061 SANTA MONICA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90069 5630 022 018 VALENTINE DR MONKARSH, JOYCE L ET AL TRS ET AL 9061 SANTA MONICA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90069 5630 022 019 VALENTINE DR POULSEN,HELGA F TR 3738 CROWN HILL DR SANTA ROSA CA 95404 5630 022 020 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 024 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 025 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A III AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 026 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 027 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A III AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 028 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A III AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 029 NOLAN AVE ROACH,JOSEPH A III AND OLGA I 491 NOLAN AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5630 022 901 VALENTINE DR L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5630 023 010 CARDIGAN AVE VALLEY CASA LLC 23901 CALABASAS RD STE 1050 CALABASAS CA 91302 5630 023 011 CARDIGAN AVE VALLEY CASA LLC 23901 CALABASAS RD STE 1050 CALABASAS CA 91302 5630 023 012 CARDIGAN AVE VALLEY CASA LLC 23901 CALABASAS RD STE 1050 CALABASAS CA 91302 5630 023 013 NESMUTH RD VALLEY CASA LLC 23901 CALABASAS RD STE 1050 CALABASAS CA 91302 5630 023 016 NESMUTH RD VALLEY CASA LLC 23901 CALABASAS RD STE 1050 CALABASAS CA 91302 5630 023 902 NESMUTH RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5630 024 904 BEAUDRY TER L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5630 025 002 VIA SALDIVAR LEHRER AND CO 2601 N COMMONWEALTH AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90027 8 35 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5632 001 006 KEMPTON RD HEMELRIJCK, RAYMUNDO V 1061 SMOKETREE DR CORONA CA 92882 5632 001 014 KEMPTON RD 265 KEMPTON VILLA LLC 1136 1/2 N PACIFIC AVE GLENDALE CA 91202 5632 025 051 ASPEN OAK LN MAR AND COMPANY INC PO BOX 5939 GLENDALE CA 91221 5632 025 052 ASPEN OAK LN MAR AND COMPANY INC PO BOX 5939 GLENDALE CA 91221 5636 011 002 1146 MELROSE AVE PROPERTY RESERVE INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151 5636 011 044 227 W DRYDEN ST ICON INVESTMENT LLC 1031 S CENTRAL AVE GLENDALE CA 91204 5638 020 035 238 CONCORD ST MY CONCORD LLC 2151 N HOBART BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90027 5640 005 023 311 W CYPRESS ST GOLBAHAR VENTURES LLC 2020 COTNER AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90025 5640 015 043 MARYLAND AVE KAZAZIAN,TAGUHI AND HOVSEP 3132 EMERALD ISLE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5640 015 044 MARYLAND AVE KAZAZIAN,TAGUHI AND HOVSEP 3132 EMERALD ISLE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5640 017 017 129 W LOS FELIZ RD KARAMANOUKIAN, ALBER K 800 S CENTRAL AVE STE 101B GLENDALE CA 91204 5640 017 018 133 W LOS FELIZ RD KARAMANOUKIAN, ALBER K 800 S CENTRAL AVE STE 101B GLENDALE CA 91204 5641 013 038 211 W WINDSOR RD SHEP DEVELOPMENT INC 348 PEACH ST MONTEREY PARK CA 91755 5643 018 024 LOUISE ST NORTH BRAND MIXED USE LLC 1125 E 17TH ST # 559 SANTA ANA CA 92701 5643 018 025 625 N LOUISE ST NORTH BRAND MIXED USE LLC 1125 E 17TH ST # 559 SANTA ANA CA 92701 5648 008 003 DWIGHT DR THOMPSON,ROBERT L AND MARTIN, ANN E 1485 DWIGHT DR GLENDALE CA 91207
5648 024 010 GLENMONT DR MARDEROSS,SHAHIK 307 W BROADWAY UNIT 10 GLENDALE CA 91204 5648 024 013 RIMCREST DR LUZURIAGA,ADEL T TR 147 CUMBERLAND RD GLENDALE CA 91202 5648 029 014 CIELITO DR JAMGOTHCHIAN, ARAXI 5206 STRATFORD RD LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5649 011 005 GLEENBRIAR AVE VITOLO,KURT TR PO BOX 40547 NASHVILLE TN 37204 5649 018 004 MOUNTAIN ST GEER,ROBERT J AND 841 E MOUNTAIN ST GLENDALE CA 91207 5649 018 030 CEDAR COURT RD BAGHRAMIAN,ARMOND M AND FIMA S 2315 MONTROSE AVE NO 101 MONTROSE CA 91020 9 36 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5649 019 006 CAVANAGH RD ARNOLD, CLYDE B TR 843 CAVANAGH RD GLENDALE CA 91207 5649 025 032 CAVANAGH RD ROWELL,JOHN D 3511 COUNTRY CLUB DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5649 026 014 CORDOVA AVE AGG COMPANY INC 11271 VENTURA BLVD #100 STUDIO CITY 91604 5649 026 024 MELWOOD DR TATOS,RAZMIK AND SILVA L TRS 290 E VERDUGO AVE STE 104 BURBANK CA 91502 5649 027 012 HILLCROFT RD HARDWARD HOLDINGS LLC 210 LOUISE TERR GLENDALE CA 91207 5650 001 016 ESMERALDA DR PIRJANIAN,SOUREN TR 701 IVY ST GLENDALE CA 91204 5650 001 017 ESMERALDA DR GTS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 1400 GREENBRIAR RD GLENDALE CA 91207 5650 039 011 SUNSHINE DR ARROYOS AND FOOTHILLS CORP PO BOX 1 PASADENA CA 91102 5652 012 014 ARVIN DR KESABYAN,MKRTICH 1132 RAYMOND AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5652 012 015 ARVIN DR CHAKYAN,KHOREN AND MARINE 14747 BESSEMER ST VAN NUYS CA 91411 5652 012 063 VERDUGO RD SCHIAVONE,JOHN R AND MARIA M 1914 SHERER LN GLENDALE CA 91208 5652 012 064 VERDUGO RD KESABYAN,MKRTICH 1132 RAYMOND AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5652 018 031 VERDUGO KNOLLS RD OLAH,GEORGE JR TR 9824 ALTMAN AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90034 5652 018 037 SHERER LN KIM, CHI HYON AND YOUNG AE TRS 1851 CRESTMONT CT GLENDALE CA 91208 5652 018 038 SHERER LN KIM, CHI HYON AND YOUNG AE TRS 1851 CRESTMONT CT GLENDALE CA 91208 5652 023 003 VERDUGO KNOLLS RD SARKISIAN,JACK H AND MARIA 17055 OAK VIEW DR ENCINO CA 91436 5653 022 031 1840 CALAFIA ST HUA,RANDY AND DANA D 1840 CALAFIA ST GLENDALE CA 91208 5653 030 800 FERN LANE SO CALIF EDISON CO LTD 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5653 030 801 FERN LANE SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5654 002 124 ALPHA RD DANIELIAN, SAM & ANAHID TRS 557 W GLENOAKS BLVD GLENDALE CA 91202 5654 002 125 ALPHA RD DANIELIAN, SAM & ANAHID TRS 557 W GLENOAKS BLVD GLENDALE CA 91202 5654 004 008 OAKWOOD AVE WHITTICK, VARD A & RITA E TRS 8941 ATLANTA AVE HUNTINGBEACH CA 92646 10 37 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5654 004 024 OAKWOOD AVE MARUTYAN,KARAPET AND KHATUN 1846 CALAFIA ST GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 006 001 SPARR BLVD GABOR,MICHAEL G AND VICKI N 3000 SPARR BLVD GLENDALE CA 91208 - 5654 008 004 1808 OAKWOOD AVE VAUGHN HOLDINGS LLC 300 INVERNESS DR LA CANADA FLINT CA 91011 5654 011 005 VISTA DEL VERDE DR PAGE,TANYA M 2818 MIRA VISTA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 011 009 VISTA DEL VERDE DR WEBB, JENNIFER P TR 1850 LOS ENCINOS AVE GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 011 010 VISTA DEL VERDE DR EL DARZI,GEORGETTE AND 345 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 301 GLENDALE CA 91206 5654 011 014 VISTA DEL VERDE DR KARAGIOSIAN,HAKOP AND CHANUM 2051 CHILTON DR GLENDALE CA 91201 5654 011 019 VISTA DEL VERDE DR CLEMENTE,JESSIE O AND 1884 LOS ENCINOS AVE GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 011 020 VISTA DEL VERDE DR QUINTANA,MARIA L 5824 MERIDIAN ST LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5654 011 023 VISTA DEL VERDE DR HAKOBYAN, YEGHISHE 9661 BLEEDING HEART AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89178 5654 011 024 VISTA DEL VERDE DR HOFFMAN, MARK J AND ELLIS, JADE C 1878 LOS ENCINOS AVE GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 011 900 VISTA DEL VERDE DR STATE OF CALIF MTNS RECREATION 570 W AVENUE 26 STE 100 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5654 012 003 VISTA DEL VERDE DR SUTER,THOMAS G AND KAREN S TRS 4622 MARELLEN PL LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5654 012 005 VISTA DEL VERDE DR MC HUGH, FRANK TR 25 S RAYMOND AVE STE 319 ALHAMBRA CA 91801 5654 012 010 VISTA DEL VERDE DR CALLES,MICHAEL J AND 9306 ELM AVE FONTANA CA 92335 5654 012 011 VISTA DEL VERDE DR VICZIAN,ANDREA TR 951 HUGO REID DR ARCADIA CA 91007 5654 012 015 VISTA DEL VERDE DR VICZIAN,ANDREA TR 951 HUGO REID DR ARCADIA CA 91007 5654 012 016 VISTA DEL VERDE DR D AGUIAR,RAYMOND A AND ANAFLOR 9304 REVERIE RD TUJUNGA CA 91042 5654 012 021 VISTA DEL VERDE DR RODRIGUEZ, ANA ET AL TRS 162 E FAIRFIELD DR CLAREMONT CA 91711 5654 012 023 VISTA DEL VERDE DR BLIKIAN,ANAHIT 4020 HAMPSTEAD RD LA CANADA FLINT. 91011 5654 012 024 VISTA DEL VERDE DR STEPANYAN,VAGE 1125 E BROADWAY #196 GLENDALE CA 91205 5654 012 034 VISTA DEL VERDE DR SRISATHAPAT,CHAD CO TR 8701 VINE VALLEY DR SUN VALLEY CA 91352 11 38 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5654 025 027 VISTA DEL VERDE DR ROJAS,FRANK 1353 KENT PL GLENDALE CA 91205 5654 025 028 VISTA DEL VERDE DR EL DARZI,GEORGETTE AND 345 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 301 GLENDALE CA 91206 5654 027 800 EMBURNS DR SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5654 027 801 EMBURNS DR SO CALIF EDISON EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5654 028 003 PASA GLEN DR GODOY, LIZA M ET AL 1090 COUNTRY RD MONTEREY PARK CA 91755 5654 028 009 PASA GLEN DR GONZALEZ,CONRADO E AND JULIA R 4930 ALDAMA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5654 028 010 PASA GLEN DR JAMGOTCHIAN,ARAXI 5206 STRATFORD RD LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5654 028 011 PASA GLEN DR JAMGOTCHIAN,ARAXI 5206 STRATFORD RD LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5654 028 013 VISTA DEL VERDE DR DANIELIAN,DAJAT ET AL 1540 CLEVELAND RD GLENDALE CA 91202 5654 028 014 PASA GLEN DR HARRINGTON,ALBERT E 2784 MIRA VISTA DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 028 015 PASA GLEN DR SAYADIAN,MARIAM 8018 LOREL AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 5654 028 020 PASA GLEN DR SAYADIAN,MARIAM 4939 BRUMMEL ST SKOKIE IL 60077 5654 028 800 PASA GLEN DR SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5654 029 800 LOS ENCINOS AVE SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5654 030 006 PASA GLEN DR COFFEY,CHARLES L AND LEILA C 1240 E LEXINGTON DR APT D GLENDALE CA 91206 5654 030 007 PASA GLEN DR COFFEY,CHARLES L AND LEILA C 1240 E LEXINGTON DR APT D GLENDALE CA 91206 5654 030 020 PASA GLEN DR BONSTIN, PHILIP B AND SHANA 1818 PASA GLEN DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5654 030 022 PASA GLEN DR BONSTIN, PHILIP B AND SHANA 1818 PASA GLEN DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5659 004 015 GRACELAND WAY RIBISI,ALBERT A 2860 GRACELAND WAY GLENDALE CA 91206 5659 005 017 2958 EDGEWICK RD OH,JONATHAN 3450 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1005 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 5659 005 021 EDGEWICK RD 2940 EDGEWICK LLC 621 PASQUAL AVE SAN GABRIEL CA 91775 5659 007 001 EDGEWICK RD JUAREZ, ISABEL 4151 N TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN BLVD LEHI UT 84043 12 39 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5659 007 013 EDGEWICK RD HOLZINGER, ANDREW AND 3045 EDGEWICK RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5659 007 015 EDGEWICK RD ANURJ PROPERTIES LLC 2544 1/2 MONTROSE AVE MONTROSE CA 91020 5659 007 024 PADDINGTON RD GIRARD,DAVID H AND H JEAN TRS 3016 ANNITA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5659 009 011 EDGEWICK RD GOLNICK,LARRY D CO TR 2865 GRACELAND WAY GLENDALE CA 91206 5659 009 014 EDGEWICK RD OLIVER,BETTY A TR 2885 EDGEWICK DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5659 020 008 GOLF CLUB DR COE, WAYNE D & ROBYN P 67 KINDERHOOK ST CHATHAM NY 12037 5659 023 904 CHEVY CHASE DR STATE OF CALIF MTNS RECREATION 570 W AVENUE 26 STE 100 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5659 023 905 CHEVY CHASE DR STATE OF CALIF MTNS RECREATION 570 W AVENUE 26 STE 100 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5659 024 010 CHEVY CHASE DR VAHDANI, IR M 1983 ASHINGTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5659 025 902 CHEVY CHASE DR STATE OF CALIF MTNS RECREATION 570 W AVENUE 26 STE 100 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5659 026 008 CHEVY CHASE DR SARKISSIAN, SAKO CO TR 416 E BROADWAY UNIT 408 GLENDALE CA 91205 5659 028 023 ASHINGTON DR SUNSET RIDGE COMMUNITY ASSOC 16461 SHERMAN WAY NO 325 VAN NUYS CA 91406 5660 003 008 CHEVY CHASE DR GOSSETT,SCOTT R AND ELIZABETH G 15800 BEAVER RUN RD CANYON COUNTRY CA 91387 5660 005 006 FIGUEROA ST LEBLANC,KENNETH F 27949 GIBSON PL SANTA CLARITA CA 91350 5660 005 012 FIGUEROA ST TICHENOR,PAUL W AND NORIKO K TRS 2024 BUCKINGHAM PL GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 005 013 FIGUEROA ST LEBLANC,KENNETH F 27949 GIBSON PL SANTA CLARITA CA 91350 5660 005 014 FIGUEROA ST MGERIAN,ANNA AND HAROUTIOUN 2016 BUCKINGHAM PL GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 006 018 LINDA VISTA RD VINCENTI, PALMA TR 3365 FIGUEROA ST GLENDALE CA 90206 5660 006 020 FIGUEROA ST HOTCHKISS, CURTIS R JR AND 5051 S KENSINGTON AVE ONTARIO CA 91762 5660 007 001 LINDA VISTA RD DEBLASIS,ROBERT J TR 183 KENWORTHY DR PASADENA CA 91105 5660 007 007 LINDA VISTA RD FU, WEI 6613 KARIN PL SAN GABRIEL CA 91775 5660 008 002 LINDA VISTA RD BEHFARIN,FRED PO BOX 70220 LOS ANGELES CA 90070 13 40 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5660 008 004 LINDA VISTA RD ROBERT HALL AND SONS CORPS PO BOX 8557 LA CRESCENTA CA 91224 5660 008 023 LINDA VISTA RD KOZANIAN,KNARIK 3470 LINDA VISTA RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 008 024 LINDA VISTA RD KOZANIAN,ANDRANIK AND KNARIK TRS 3470 LINDA VISTA RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 008 027 LINDA VISTA RD KOZANIAN,KNARIK 3470 LINDA VISTA RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 013 003 BUCKINGHAM RD OFLAHERTY, MELODY J AND 1703 N AVENUE 55 LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5660 013 005 LINDA VISTA RD DAVERN,DONALD J TR 113 N SKYLINE DR CHATHAM MA 02633 5660 014 800 LINDA VISTA RD SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5660 015 006 CHARING CROSS NAZARYAN,SAM 2048 ASHINGTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 015 014 BUCKINGHAM RD HOGAN, PETER V AND YASINTA P 3255 BUCKINGHAM RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 015 016 BUCKINGHAM RD ROGALSKI, RYAN 3229 BUCKINGHAM RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 015 018 CHARING CROSS NAZARYAN,SAM 2048 ASHINGTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 015 029 BUCKINGHAM RD ROGALSKI, RYAN 3229 BUCKINGHAM RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 015 800 E CHEVY CHASE DR SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5660 017 007 DUNSMERE RD OTT,JOHN L TR 2587 E WAHSINGTON BLVD #321 PASADENA CA 91107 5660 018 903 LINDA VISTA RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5660 019 014 CORNWELL DR GASTELUM, ART M 300 N LAKE AVE 12TH FL PASADENA CA 91101 5660 019 015 CORNWELL DR COHEN,PINCHAS CO TR 315 24TH ST SANTA MONICA CA 90402 5660 019 900 LINDA VISTA RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5660 019 901 LINDA VISTA RD L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5660 020 034 HOLLYWELL PL KLINTWORTH,PHILIP G AND 318 WILLIS RD SALINE MI 48176 5660 020 035 CORNWELL DR KLINTWORTH,PAUL AND 7701 PORT ARTHUR DR EASTVALE CA 82880 5660 021 027 ST GREGORY RD BABAIAN, ARTHUR 14268 LORNE ST PANORAMA CITY CA 91402 14 41 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5660 022 001 GREENWICH RD LEDESMA,JULIAN AND SHAMIM, A 1503 N CAHUENGA BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90028 5660 022 003 GREENWICH RD NAMJO,HOMAYOUN ET AL 15515 E SUNSET BLVD NO 221 PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 5660 022 004 GREENWICH RD NAMJO,HOMAYOUN ET AL 15515 E SUNSET BLVD NO 221 PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 5660 022 005 GREENWICH RD SWIFT,CHARLES W AND DOLLY J TRS 10306 BECKFORD AVE PORTER RANCH CA 91411 5660 022 007 GREENWICH RD LAU,CHUNG M 115 LOS HIGOS ST ALHAMBRA CA 91801 5660 022 008 GREENWICH RD KOTOLYAN, ALEKSANDR AND 6130 COLDWATER CANYON AVE UNIT 13 N HOLLYWOOD CA 91606 5660 023 012 GREENWICH RD NEUWEG,ERIC 2919 GREENWICH RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 023 014 GREENWICH RD CHEN,CHU CHI CO TR 3807 SW CHELMSFORD RD TOPEKA KS 66610 5660 023 018 GREENWICH RD PARK, SOON WON AND PIL HEE 3722 PARAISO WAY LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5660 024 002 TRAMMELL RD WONG,KATHY P TR PO BOX 3803 SOUTH PASADENA CA 91031 5660 024 012 TRAMMELL RD groner, mark p and 2750 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 024 013 GREENWICH RD KASABYAN,JOSEPH 725 S GLENDALE AVE STE D GLENDALE CA 91205 5660 024 014 GREENWICH RD BALSAM, JODY A 3727 W MAGNOLIA BLVD UNIT 155 BURBANK CA 91505 5660 024 015 GREENWICH RD COLVIN,DEAN E AND THERESA R TRS 2816 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 024 025 GREENWICH RD YEGANYAN,EMMA 7931 GREENBUSH AVE PANORAMA CITY CA 91402 5660 024 027 GREENWICH RD VARILLA,ERLINDA CO TR 18046 ESPITO ST ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748 5660 024 028 GREENWICH RD VARILLA,ERLINDA CO TR 18046 ESPITO ST NO 2988 ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748 5660 024 029 TRAMMELL RD GALYON,JOHN TR 1210 E TUJUNGA AVE BURBANK CA 91501 5660 024 034 GREENWICH RD GRONER, MARK P AND 2750 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5660 026 027 STORM DRAIN EAS LOGAN GASTROENTEROLGY CONS INC 13942 WESTWOOD WAY RO. CUCAMONGA CA 91739 5660 032 024 FIGUEROA ST ROBINS,IAN PO BOX 9904 GLENDALE CA 91226 5660 032 044 FIGUEROA ST PANGESTU,JULARDI S AND 333 S MANHATTAN PL UNIT 7 LOS ANGELES CA 90020 15 42 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5660 033 005 DUNSMERE RD LEWIS, CRAIG W AND JANA 1308 E COLORADO BLVD STE 604 PASADENA CA 91106 5660 033 270 FIGUEROA ST PASADENA WATER DEPT 150 S LOS ROBLES AVE STE 200 PASADENA CA 91101 5660 033 800 FIGUEROA ST SO CALIF EDISON CO 2 INNOVATION WAY POMONA CA 91768 5660 034 026 FIGUEROA ST FAIR OAKS COMMUNITY ASSN 7969 FOOTHILL BLVD SUNLAND CA 91040 5660 037 039 FIGUEROA ST FAIR OAKS COMMUNITY ASSN 7969 FOOTHILL BLVD SUNLAND CA 91040 5661 006 037 SINCLAIR AVE CRISTIN-POUCHER,STEVEN AND LILLI 755 LUTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5661 007 035 SINCLAIR AVE TSASU LLC AND CHANG, HUI WEN 15350 GALE AVE HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745 5661 007 036 SINCLAIR AVE TSASU LLC AND CHANG, HUI WEN 15350 GALE AVE HACIENDA HEIGHTS CA 91745 5662 009 002 LILAC LANE CHARUM,SHEILA 2050 LILAC LN GLENDALE CA 91206 5662 009 003 LILAC LANE TRIAS CHARUM,SHEILA 2050 LILAC LN GLENDALE CA 91206 5662 009 020 MOUNT CARMEL DR ROBLES,JUAN 2100 S HOBART BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90018 5662 012 010 HOLLISTER TER CHUNG,THOMAS Y AND CHANY N TRS 5525 WILSHIRE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90036 5662 018 016 DRURY LANE MANDEKIE,MICHAEL 2430 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5662 019 001 OLYMPIC DR BRUEHL,DIETER CO TR ET AL 1857 N CURSON AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90046 5662 019 002 OLYMPIC DR RAUHUT,SVEN CO TR 521 CENTRAL AVE SEAL BEACH CA 90740 5662 019 011 CHEVY CHASE DR MUNRO, RAYMOND TR 59 GLENFLOW CT GLENDALE CA 91206 5662 019 012 CHEVY CHASE DR LOPEZ, SHADIA K 1224 E HARVARD ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5662 020 006 OLYMPIC DR SHATS,IRINA TR 826 N HOLLYWOOD WAY BURBANK CA 91505 5662 020 007 OLYMPIC DR SHATS,IRINA TR 826 N HOLLYWOOD WAY BURBANK CA 91505 5662 020 008 OLYMPIC DR BEDROSIAN,HOREN AND VAHE 405 E PALMER AVE NO 7 GLENDALE CA 91205 5662 020 009 OLYMPIC DR HERNANDEZ,FERNANDO C CO TR 225 THOMPSON AVE GLENDALE CA 91201 5662 020 010 OLYMPIC DR BRUEHL,DIETER CO TR ET AL 1857 N CURSON AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90046 16 43 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5662 020 011 OLYMPIC DR D AGUILAR, MICHAEL A 4170 W 122ND ST HAWTHORNE CA 90250 5662 020 014 OLYMPIC DR BRUEHL,DIETER CO TR ET AL 1857 N CURSON AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90046 5662 021 008 OLYMPIC DR SONG, YOOHA 800 W 1ST ST UNIT 610 LOS ANGELES CA 90012 5662 021 009 OLYMPIC DR SONG, YOOHA 800 W 1ST ST UNIT 610 LOS ANGELES CA 90012 5662 021 010 OLYMPIC DR DREAM HOME FUNDING INC 2029 VERDUGO BLVD NO 108 MONTROSE CA 91020 5662 021 011 OLYMPIC DR DREAM HOME FUNDING INC 2029 VERDUGO BLVD NO 108 MONTROSE CA 91020 5663 003 002 CHEVY CHASE DR DOVLATIAN,ARMEN AND 213 N ORANGE ST STE A GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 007 008 BARNETT DR PRESLO,KENNETH M AND JANICE B 405 CALLE DE ARAGON TORRANCE CA 90277 5663 007 023 CHEVY CHASE DR TODD,MIA D AND PETERSON, JESSE W 2225 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 008 018 RIDGE DR CHEVY CHASE TOWNHOUSES HOA 61 S LAKE AVE PASADENA CA 91101 5663 009 001 BARNETT DR SHAHRYAR LLC 28880 MICHELLE DR AGOURA HILLS CA 91301 5663 009 002 BARNETT DR NATIAN,ALBERT 2321 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 009 003 BARNETT DR HONG,SUNG P AND YOUNG Z TRS 2770 SANBORN AVE LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 5663 009 004 BARNETT DR KASSABIAN,HRATCH AND ARPI 9260 LA SHELL DR TUJUNGA CA 91042 5663 009 005 BARNETT DR KASSABIAN,HRATCH AND ARPI 9260 LA SHELL DR TUJUNGA CA 91042 5663 009 006 BARNETT DR SCHNEIDER,LAURAL L AND 6455 BIXBY TERRACE DR LONG BEACH CA 90815 5663 009 007 BARNETT DR NAZARI,TOMIK 20202 COHASSET ST UNIT 14 WINNETKA CA 91306 5663 009 008 BARNETT DR JOOMA,MAHOMED S 510 17TH ST SANTA MONICA CA 90402 5663 009 010 CASCADIA DR PRESLO,KENNETH M AND JANICE B 405 CALLE DE ARAGON TORRANCE CA 90277 5663 009 015 RAMSAY DR TURNER, THOMAS C 501 JUNIPER DR PASADENA CA 91105 5663 009 016 BARNETT DR TURNER, THOMAS C 501 JUNIPER DR PASADENA CA 91105 5663 011 001 RAMSEY DR LAI, CHRISTINE 1105 OUTLOOK LN GLENDALE CA 91206 17 44 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5663 011 008 BARNETT DR BINZLEY,WARREN G TR 2401 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 011 009 BARNETT DR BINZLEY,WARREN G TR 2401 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 011 011 CASCADIA DR BINZLEY,WARREN G TR 2401 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 011 012 CASCADIA DR BINZLEY,WARREN G TR 2401 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 011 014 BARNETT DR BINZLEY,WARREN G TR 2401 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 011 016 BARNETT DR BINZLEY,WARREN G TR 2401 CASCADIA DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 011 017 BARNETT DR TOROSSIAN,ROOBINA TR 1170 ALLEN AVE UNIT 1 GLENDALE CA 91201 5663 011 018 BARNETT DR TOROSSIAN,ROOBINA TR 1170 ALLEN AVE UNIT 1 GLENDALE CA 91201 5663 011 020 BARNETT DR KOO,VILCAR AND KIM, SANGHYO PO BOX 2317 PASADENA CA 91102 5663 012 003 ST ANDREWS DR VARTANIAN,ARA R 4150 HAMPSTEAD RD LA CANADA FLINT. CA 91011 5663 013 003 ST ANDREWS DR MINAS,CARO AND REBECCA F TRS 4742 SAN FERNANDO RD GLENDALE CA 91204 5663 013 007 ST ANDREWS DR OHANIAN, DAVID AND BEAINY AND 1661 RIVERSIDE DR GLENDALE CA 91201 5663 013 008 ST ANDREWS DR JAFFE, TALIESIN 2565 SAINT ANDREWS DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 013 009 ST ANDREWS DR CHONG,YEW CHOY AND MAY TRS 1620 SANTA ROSA AVE GLENDALE CA 91208 5663 013 012 ST ANDREWS DR HAKOPIAN,ALBERT M AND PO BOX 3762 BURBANK CA 91508 5663 013 013 ST ANDREWS DR VINELOGIC HOLDINGS INC 3081 E COMERCIAL BLVD STE 200 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33308 5663 013 014 ST ANDREWS DR MI CASA PROPERTY LLC 1330 OAK VIEW AVE SAN MARINO CA 91108 5663 014 007 ST ANDREWS DR SIMONIAN, ARTIN T TR 501 W GLENOAKS BLVD UNIT 556 GLENDALE CA 91202 5663 014 008 ST ANDREWS DR SIMONIAN, ARTIN T TR 501 W GLENOAKS BLVD UNIT 556 GLENDALE CA 91202 5663 014 011 CHEVY CHASE DR SANFILIPPO, JEFFREY T 789 PLUM TREE RD BARRINGTON IL 60010 5663 014 012 CHEVY CHASE DR SANFILIPPO, JEFFREY T 789 PLUM TREE RD BARRINGTON IL 60010 5663 014 015 KENNINGTON DR MCREE,SHARON S 2660 KENNINGTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 18 45 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5663 014 016 CHEVY CHASE DR CANAL,YOLANDA 26848 MARINA POINT LN NO 45 VALENCIA CA 91355 5663 014 021 ST ANDREWS DR 101 CENTRAL PACIFIC 101 N VERDUGO RD STE 9231 GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 014 023 ST ANDREWS DR JAFFE, TALIESIN 2565 SAINT ANDREWS DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 014 024 ST ANDREWS DR JAFFE, TAIESIN 2565 SAINT ANDREWS DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 014 026 ST ANDREWS DR SAMADZADEH,ABBASS T 3151 ARDMORE LN OXNARD CA 93036 5663 014 027 ST ANDREWS DR SAMADZADEH,ABBASS T 3151 ARDMORE LN OXNARD CA 93036 5663 014 028 ST ANDREWS DR SAMADZADEH,ABBASS T 3151 ARDMORE LN OXNARD CA 93036 5663 014 039 ST ANDREWS DR SANFILIPPO, JEFFREY 789 PLUM TREE RD BARRINGTON IL 60010 5663 014 040 ST ANDREWS DR SANFILIPPO, JEFFREY 789 PLUM TREE RD BARRINGTON IL 60010 5663 014 041 KENNINGTON DR KUIUMDJIAN,ALEX CO TR 1005 VIA CARMELITA BURBANK CA 91501 5663 015 002 KENNINGTON DR NORTHRUP,MEGAN ET AL PO BOX 261570 PLANO TX 75026 5663 015 007 CASCADIA DR YOUNG BLUE LLC 1910 W SUNSET BLVD STE 450 LOS ANGELES CA 90026 5663 015 009 CASCADIA DR YOUNG BLUE LLC 625 FAIR OAKS AVE STE 390 SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030 5663 016 001 SOMERSET RD BASILYAN, GREGORI TR 3240 MENLO DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5663 016 002 BARNETT DR ATLANTIC INVESTORS GROUP CORP 1146 N CENTRAL AVE UNIT 340 GLENDALE CA 91202 5663 017 002 EDMONTON RD KEVORKIAN, GARO 2811 KENNINGTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 017 003 EDMONTON RD D W AND G ARMSTRONG TRS 2955 EDMONTON RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 017 005 EDMONTON RD YZAGUIRRE,JESSIE PO BOX 285 LA CANADA 91012 5663 019 003 KENNINGTON DR 101 CENTRAL PACIFIC PO BOX 9231 GLENDALE CA 91226 5663 019 004 KENNINGTON DR SHAHBANDARIAN,ALFRED 8709 GLENOAKS BLVD SUN VALLEY CA 91352 5663 019 005 KENNINGTON DR SHIN, DAVID 1452 KENSINGTON RD SAN MARINO CA 91108 5663 019 006 KENNINGTON DR HSIAO, CHIN 26 NORWICH IRVINE CA 92620 19 46 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5663 019 010 KENNINGTON DR HABIB, MOHAMMAD I 11578 MARIPOSA BAY LN PORTER RANCH CA 91326 5663 020 008 KENNINGTON DR CHOE,SOO SANG AND CHA NAM PO BOX 52080 IRVINE CA 92619 5663 020 011 CHEVY CHASE DR ORTIZ, MIGUEL AND 501 MAGNOLIA ST UNIT 103 SOUTH PASADENA CA 91030 5663 020 015 KENNINGTON DR KIRK,SUNG H 1111 SILVERLEAF CANYON RD BEAUMONT CA 92223 5663 020 016 KENNINGTON DR KIRK,SUNG H 1111 SILVERLEAF CANYON RD BEAUMONT CA 92223 5663 020 017 KENNINGTON DR KIM,CHUL HO AND SUNG HYUN 1111 SILVERLEAF CANYON RD BEAUMONT CA 92223 5663 022 004 KENNINGTON DR MOON ROBERT AND 2801 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5663 022 011 CHEVY CHASE DR KELEDJIAN, EILEEN TR PO BOX 2894 MISSION VIEJO CA 92690 5663 025 013 CHEVY OAKS DR CHEVY CHASE TOWNHOUSES HOA 61 S LAKE AVE PASADENA CA 91101 5663 026 022 CHEVY OAKS DR CHEVY CHASE TOWNHOUSES HOA 61 S LAKE AVE PASADENA CA 91101 5663 027 031 CHEVY OAKS DR CHEVY CHASE TOWNHOUSES HOA 61 S LAKE AVE PASADENA CA 91101 5663 028 900 CALLE SONRISA L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5663 028 904 CALLE CONTENTO L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5663 032 078 CAMINO SAN RAFAEL HOMES BY POLYGON 23161 MILL CREEK DR STE 200 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 5663 032 079 CAMINO SAN RAFAEL HOMES BY POLYGON 23161 MILL CREEK DR STE 200 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 5663 037 021 CASCADIA DR RANCHO SAN RAFAEL COMM ASSN 3415 S SEPULVEDA BLVD STE 720 LOS ANGELES CA 90034 5663 038 900 CAMINO SAN RAFAEL L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5663 038 901 CALLE DEL SOL L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5663 038 902 CALLE DEL SOL L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5663 038 903 CALLE DEL SOL L A CO FLOOD CONTROL DIST 900 S FREMONT AVE ALHAMBRA CA 91803 5663 041 066 CALLE SIRENA KIM,TAE WOO 1950 CALLE SIRENA GLENDALE CA 91208 5665 006 004 AVONOAK TERR TORRELLAS, MAGDA PO BOX 232 SAN DIMAS CA 91773 20 47 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5665 006 014 SWATHMORE DR BASILYAN,GREGORI CO TR 3240 MENLO DR GLENDALE CA 91208 5665 008 017 LURKING DR FANSELAU,ELEANOR R 1100 FURMAN PL GLENDALE CA 91206 5665 014 029 GLADYS DR BOGHOSSIAN,ERIC 1111 N BRAND BLVD STE 202 GLENDALE CA 91202 5665 014 031 GLADYS DR BOGHOSSIAN,ERIC 1090 KILDONAN DR GLENDALE CA 91207 5665 014 038 GLADYS DR BOGHOSSIAN,ERIC 1090 KILDONAN DR GLENDALE CA 91207 5665 014 040 GLADYS DR BOGHOSSIAN,ERIC 1090 KILDONAN DR GLENDALE CA 91207 5665 015 004 LURKING DR BARBIERI, JUAN AND RENEE 135 S JACKSON ST STE 201B GLENDALE CA 91205 5665 015 005 LURKING DR JAGHOURI, MOHAMMAD R PO BOX 1814 GLENDALE CA 91209 5665 015 006 LURKING DR COJACK LLC 13563 S 27TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98005 5665 015 007 LURKING DR COJACK LLC 13563 S 27TH PL BELLEVUE WA 98005 5665 015 016 GLADYS DR OUZOUNIAN, VIKEN 3218 KIRKHAM DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5665 015 017 GLADYS DR JOU, MONICA 12338 PRIMROSE AVE WHITTIER CA 90602 5665 015 019 1719 GLADYS DR BARBIERI, JUAN AND RENEE 135 S JACKSON ST STE 201B GLENDALE CA 91205 5665 015 024 GLADYS DR HI-LITE DEVELOPMENT CO PO BOX 841 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 5665 017 028 CARLA DR SEWER,IHSAN M AND 621 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 8 GLENDALE CA 91206 5665 017 029 CARLA DR SEWER,IHSAN M AND 621 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 8 GLENDALE CA 91206 5665 017 030 CARLA DR SEWER,IHSAN M AND 621 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 8 GLENDALE CA 91206 5665 017 031 CARLA DR SEWER,IHSAN M AND 621 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 8 GLENDALE CA 91206 5665 017 032 CARLA DR SEWER,IHSAN M AND 621 N KENWOOD ST UNIT 8 GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 001 001 GLENOAKS BLVD TONOYAN, TIGRAN 2276 HOLLISTER TERRACE GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 002 901 GLENOAKS CYN DR L A COUNTY 500 W TEMPLE ST RM 754 LOS ANGELES CA 90012 5666 003 002 PENNERTON DR BENVANI INC PO BOX 158 VERDUGO CITY CA 91046 21 48 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5666 004 018 2241 HOLLISTER TER BENVANI INC PO BOX 158 VERDUGO CITY CA 91046 5666 004 019 ARCH PL HAUS OF FROST INC 1388 BALMORAL DR GLENDALE CA 91207 5666 004 020 ARCH PL RIZK, ANTHONY A AND RITA 3781 GLENALBYN DR LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5666 004 038 WESTFIELD ST BENVANI INC PO BOX 158 VERDUGO CITY CA 91046 5666 007 013 SUNCOURT TER VONRAK, ALEXIA C CO TR 2027 W GIDDINGS ST CHICAGO IL 60625 5666 007 014 SUNCOURT TER VONRAK, ALEXIA C CO TR 2027 W GIDDINGS ST CHICAGO IL 60625 5666 007 015 SUNCOURT TER LENTZ,FRANK AND TRACEY 542 SUNCOURT TER GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 008 007 ARCH PL GERAGOS,MICHAEL 2155 VERDUGO BLVD STE 614 MONTROSE CA 91020 5666 008 034 PENNERTON DR ASLANIAN, VAROUJAN CO TR 4807 CLOUDSDALE AVE GLENDALE CA 91214 5666 008 039 PENNERTON DR BARD,BRIAN D TR 2351 PENNERTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 008 040 PENNERTON DR BARD,BRIAN D TR 2351 PENNERTON DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 008 041 PENNERTON DR MBELU, UGONNA 14623 HAWTHORNE BLVD LAWNDALE CA 90260 5666 009 014 GARDNER PL ROCHA,COLLETTE G 454 DEL COURT PL GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 013 005 HOLLISTER TER BISTAGNE, ROBERT E 1400 E CHEVY CHASE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 014 008 DEVONSHIRE LN COFFMAN,TIMOTHY D AND ANGELA P 458 DEVONSHIRE LN GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 016 013 GLENOAKS BLVD TONOYAN, TIGRAN 2276 HOLLISTER TERRACE GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 017 008 GLENOAKS BLVD GUTIERREZ, JONATHAN R AND 2700 E GLENOAKS BLVD GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 017 014 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL ALMADA,LOURDES PO BOX 254 NORCO CA 92860 5666 018 005 CORLINGTON RD FORMICA,DALIA TR 1461 BELLEAU RD GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 018 006 GLENOAKS BLVD METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 018 019 GLENOAKS BLVD ESPARZA, ISMAEL JR AND 4524 BOWMAN BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90032 5666 018 020 GLENOAKS BLVD ESPARZA, ISMAEL JR AND 4524 BOWMAN BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90032 22 49 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5666 018 021 GLENOAKS BLVD AYNEHCHI, YAGHOUB AND HAIDEH H 204 S OAKHURST DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212 5666 019 012 CORLINGTON RD CAILIPAN,CHRISTINA R 353 N PROSPECTORS RD DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 5666 019 016 GLENOAKS BLVD CAILIPAN,ROBERT R 24199 HIGHCREST DR DIAMOND BAR CA 91765 5666 019 017 GLENOAKS BLVD OGAWA,FAYE M 2528 E GLENOAKS BLVD GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 019 030 EDWARDS PL SWAN, JEREMY AND VANESSA 2445 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 019 031 EDWARDS PL CORPUZ,JEFFREY S CO TR 435 LEWIS ST LOS ANGELES CA 90042 5666 019 036 CORLINGTON RD CARDENAS, MARIA 14545 VICTORY BLVD STE 418 VAN NUYS CA 91411 5666 020 004 EDWARDS PL BABOUDJIAN, VARDAN CO TR 1002 S ADAMS ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5666 020 005 EDWARDS PL BABOUDJIAN, VARDAN CO TR 1002 S ADAMS ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5666 020 006 EDWARDS PL BABOUDJIAN, VARDAN CO TR 1002 S ADAMS ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5666 020 049 EDWARDS PL PAPAZYAN, ARUTYUN 2025 PARKMOUNT DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 021 001 EDWARDS PL DE LEON,J ALEX 9514 WORKMAN AVE TEMPLE CITY CA 91780 5666 021 012 ARGUS DR METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 021 013 WYNDALE PL METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 021 014 WYNDALE PL METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 021 015 WYNDALE PL METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 021 023 WYNDALE PL METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 021 024 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL METS HAYQ LLC 801 N BRAND BLVD STE 210 GLENDALE CA 91203 5666 022 013 VALLE VISTA DR DELSON INVESTMENT COMPANY 9735 WILSHIRE BLVD 122 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212 5666 022 031 VALLE VISTA DR KHAJEHKIAN,GEORGE 7239 KESTER AVE VAN NUYS CA 91405 5666 022 032 VALLE VISTA DR DUNN,STEVEN D AND 2601 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 022 033 VALLE VISTA DR DUNN,STEVEN D AND 2601 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 23 50 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5666 022 034 VALLE VISTA DR DUNN,STEVEN D AND 2601 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 023 005 VALLE VISTA DR AKHVERDYAN, GENRIK H AND HELEN 2922 N LINCOLN ST BURBANK CA 91504 5666 023 006 VALLE VISTA DR AKHVERDYAN, GENRIK H AND HELEN 2922 N LINCOLN ST BURBANK CA 91504 5666 023 007 VALLE VISTA DR AKHVERDYAN, GENRIK H AND HELEN 2922 N LINCOLN ST BURBANK CA 91504 5666 023 025 VALLE VISTA DR COHENMAYS,LEAH L 888 N ALAMEDA ST APT 525E LOS ANGELES CA 90012 5666 023 026 VALLE VISTA DR FRANKLIN, IAN S AND MARIGOLD 1242 SWARTHMORE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 023 028 VALLE VISTA DR T AND M WHOLESALE PLUMBING 4918 W WASHINGTON BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90016 5666 023 029 VALLE VISTA DR WOJDAK,PAUL 2605 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 023 030 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL WOJDAK,PAUL 2605 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5666 023 031 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL HERNANDEZ, JAMES I 6221 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 310 LOS ANGELES CA 90048 5666 027 019 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL RESERVE GLENDALE I COMMUNITY 4730 WOODMAN AVE #200 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91423 5666 027 020 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL RESERVE GLENDALE I COMMUNITY 4730 WOODMAN AVE STE 200 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91423 5672 008 001 GLEN IVY DR MARRUJO,ERNEST AND GUDELIA TRS PO BOX 9758 GLENDALE CA 91226 5672 008 002 GLEN IVY DR MARRUJO,ERNEST AND GUDELIA TRS PO BOX 9758 GLENDALE CA 91226 5672 009 001 GLEN IVY DR MARRUJO,ERNEST AND GUDELIA TRS PO BOX 9758 GLENDALE CA 91226 5672 009 002 GLEN IVY DR MARRUJO,ERNEST AND GUDELIA PO BOX 9758 GLENDALE CA 91226 5672 009 003 GLEN IVY DR MARRUJO,ERNEST AND GUDELIA TRS PO BOX 9758 GLENDALE CA 91226 5672 021 001 SCHOLL DR SHAOLIN TEMPLE GROUP LLC 2248 S OAK KNOLL AVE PASADENA CA 91108 5672 022 024 SCHOLL DR MUFG UNION BANK TR 445 S FIGUEROA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90071 5672 022 026 SLEEPY HOLLOW PL BASELINE CAPITAL INVESTMET LLC 15260 VENTURA BLVD STE 700 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403 5672 022 027 BLACKMORE DR BASELINE CAPITAL INVESTMET LLC 15260 VENTURA BLVD STE 700 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403 5672 022 028 BLACKMORE DR P A R MT CARMEL LLC 115 1/2 VERDUGO RD GLENDALE CA 91206 24 51 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5672 022 029 BLACKMORE DR GABRIELIAN, CRAIG TR PO BOX1534 SYKESVILLE MD 21784 5672 022 030 BLACKMORE DR MUFG UNION BANK TR 445 S FIGUEROA ST LOS ANGELES CA 90071 5672 022 039 BLACKMORE DR FREUDENBERG,SCOTT M 2252 E GLENOAKS BLVD GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 023 017 GREENGROVE DR MORET, LUIS 8333 GLENCREST DR SUN VALLEY CA 91352 5672 023 018 GREENGROVE DR BRAJNIKOFF, MARK V 2419 S VERMONT AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90007 5672 023 019 GREENGROVE DR NEBBITT, AUSANTA 741 VENICE WAY STE 2 INGLEWOOD CA 90302 5672 023 020 GREENGROVE DR DELOS SANTOS, SNDRES P JR AND 3401 EL CONLON AVE APT 106 LAS VEGAS NV 89102 5672 023 021 GREENGROVE DR DELOS SANTOS, SNDRES P JR AND 3401 EL CONLON AVE APT 106 LAS VEGAS NV 89102 5672 023 022 GREENGROVE DR MUDDASANI,SRICHARAN R 132 N ALLEN AVE NO 1 PASADENA CA 91106 5672 023 023 GREENGROVE DR MUDDASANI,SRICHARAN R 132 N ALLEN AVE NO 1 PASADENA CA 91106 5672 025 003 GREENGROVE DR ROSENMAN,JEFFREY AND HEATHER TRS 2442 BYWOOD DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 025 006 GREENGROVE DR HAMMER, KAREN L 2450 BYWOOD DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 025 007 SOUTHWOOD DR MARTINEZ, BERTHA C AND 5328 NEWCASTLE AVE UNIT 16 ENCINO CA 91316 5672 025 008 SOUTHWOOD DR HSU,JONG N AND HUEY M 20050 WASHINGTON AVE UNIT 202 CERRITOS CA 90703 5672 025 009 SOUTHWOOD DR GOLDEN ABACUS GROUP LLC PO BOX 91852 PASADENA CA 91109 5672 025 011 SOUTHWOOD DR CARNAHAN,ROBERT B AND EDWINA S 2570 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 025 012 SOUTHWOOD DR CARNAHAN,ROBERT B AND EDWINA S 2570 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 025 013 HARLOW DR CARNAHAN,ROBERT B AND EDWINA S 2570 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 025 041 HARLOW DR CARNAHAN,ROBERT B AND EDWINA S 2570 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 025 043 HARLOW DR CARNAHAN,ROBERT B AND EDWINA S 2570 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR GLENDALE CA 91206 5672 026 001 HARLOW DR SHUM,ERIC W AND WENDY S 8 BRUNSWICK LN LINCOLNSHIRE IL 60069 5677 007 007 MISSION RD HIGHBERGER,WILLIAM F AND 1509 LACHMAN LN PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 25 52 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5677 007 008 MISSION RD HIGHBERGER,WILLIAM F AND 1509 LACHMAN LN PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 5677 007 009 MISSION RD HIGHBERGER,WILLIAM F AND 1509 LACHMAN LN PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 5677 007 010 MISSION RD HIGHBERGER,WILLIAM F AND 1509 LACHMAN LN PACIFIC PALISADES CA 90272 5677 008 028 MISSION RD HSUEH,HERMANN H AND JULIE B TRS 499 CASUDA CANYON DR MONTEREY PARK CA 91754 5677 008 031 COLBY DR HSUEH,HERMAN H AND JULIE B TRS 499 CASUDA CANYON DR MONTEREY PARK CA 91754 5677 018 001 ALTA VISTA DR FOREST LAWN MORTUARY 1712 S GLENDALE AVE GLENDALE CA 91205 5677 018 003 CYPRESS ST BENISTY, JACK 1160 S SWALL DR LOS ANGELES CA 90035 5677 018 005 PROSPECT DR DORAN, MORGAN B TR 644 E CYPRESS ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5677 018 007 PROSPECT DR DORAN, MORGAN B TR 644 E CYPRESS ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5677 018 008 PROSPECT DR DORAN, MORGAN B TR 644 E CYPRESS ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5677 018 014 CYPRESS ST BERROCAL,ALEX TR 5536 MORELLA AVE N HOLLYWOOD CA 91607 5677 019 006 CYPRESS ST BARHOUM MALOUF PROPERTIES LLC 1109 N MICHIGAN AVE PASADENA CA 91104 5677 025 011 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 025 017 1303 COLUMBIA DR FOREST LAWN MORTUARY PO BOX 1151 GLENDALE CA 912096 5677 026 010 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 026 011 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 026 012 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 026 013 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 026 014 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 026 015 COLUMBIA DR HOLLIS,STEPHEN S 4013 ALADDIN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649
5677 027 009 1505 WELLESLEY DR KARANFILIAN,ARTHUR 1505 WELLESLEY DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5678 005 011 BERKELEY DR VM PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH INC 1110 PRINCETON DR GLENDALE CA 91205 26 53 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5678 012 010 OBERLIN DR LORRIN MCCORMIK TR AND 10153 1/2 RIVERSIDE DR 311 TOLUCA LAKE CA 91602 5678 012 018 OBERLIN DR GUERRA,BLANCA A 452 VIA MIRAMONTE MONTEBELLO CA 90640 5678 012 022 OBERLIN DR AZARBIN,HOOSHANG 2800 S SYRACUSE WAY #9-302 DENVER CO 80231 5678 012 023 OBERLIN DR RUFF, STEPHEN AND VICTORIA 874 MILLS ESTATE PL CHULUOTA FL 32766 5678 015 010 CORONA DR PINON, SAUL G PO BOX 86223 LOS ANGELES CA 90086 5678 016 025 SCENIC DR DECKER,ANTOINETTE T ET AL TRS 1252 SCENIC DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5678 018 011 MARION DR NASH,GREG M AND NARDONI, CARLA C 1620 LOMA CREST ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5678 018 012 MARION DR ALLAN,ROGER 1626 LOMA CREST ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5678 018 021 MARION DR AINTABLIAN,VREJ 10728 OWENS PL TUJUNGA CA 91042 5678 018 022 MARION DR AINTABLIAN,VREJ 10728 OWENS PL TUJUNGA CA 91042 5678 018 023 MARION DR FOUR SAR INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 125 S VIRGINIA AVE STE 103 BURBANK CA 91506 5678 018 024 MARION DR FOUR SAR INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 125 S VIRGINIA AVE STE 103 BURBANK CA 91506 5678 018 025 MARION DR FOUR SAR INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 125 S VIRGINIA AVE STE 103 BURBANK CA 91506 5679 011 022 OBERLIN DR BACINO,FRANK M TR 1117 OBERLIN DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 011 024 OBERLIN DR KONG,REUBEN C AND BERTHA G 1112 MARION DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 012 016 OBERLIN DR RAYNER,DOMINIC G AND 1019 OBERLIN DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 013 013 OBERLIN DR MCMURDIE,BRUCE J 9404 LOW TIDE CT LAS VEGAS NV 89117 5679 014 010 OBERLIN DR CHACON,CHRISTOPHER AND 1304 OBERLIN DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 015 008 PALMER AVE CASTELLANOS, DELIA F 724 NEW DEPOT ST APT 2 LOS ANGELES CA 90012 5679 015 010 PALMER AVE LAWRENCE,JENNIFER E 1400 E PALMER AVE GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 015 011 PALMER AVE VASQUEZ,MARIA A 1449 MONTECITO DR LOS ANGELES CA 90031 5679 015 012 PALMER AVE VASQUEZ,MARIA A 1449 MONTECITO DR LOS ANGELES CA 90031 27 54 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
5679 015 013 PALMER AVE VASQUEZ,MARIA A 1449 MONTECITO DR LOS ANGELES CA 90031 5679 015 014 PALMER AVE VASQUEZ,MARIA A 1449 MONTECITO DR LOS ANGELES CA 90031 5679 015 017 CORONA DR MILLER,KENNETH G AND DIANE L TRS 1203 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 015 018 CORONA DR SAAVEDRA, COURTNEY D 1219 CORONA DR GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 001 CORONA DR ALIGNED PROPERTIES LLC 8207 BROOKGREEN RD DOWNEY CA 90240 5679 016 002 CORONA DR ALIGNED PROPERTIES LLC 8207 BROOKGREEN RD DOWNEY CA 90240 5679 016 003 CORONA DR JAMES,WINSTON 1235 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 004 CORONA DR JAMES,WINSTON 1235 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 005 CORONA DR MISSAGHI,PEDRAM 1225 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 007 CORONA DR BLAIR, PAUL E 700 S SANTA FE AVE FL LOS ANGELES CA 90021 5679 016 008 CORONA DR BLAIR, PAUL E 1215 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 009 CORONA DR BLAIR, PAUL E 1215 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 015 VISTA SUPERBA JAMES,WINSTON 1235 VISTA SUPERBA ST GLENDALE CA 91205 5679 016 022 CORONA DR GIOVANNINI,JOSEPH 151 E 37TH ST APT 2 NEW YORK NY 10016 5679 016 023 CORONA DR DAHLIN,PAUL AND MASAMI 3017 FUTURE ST LOS ANGELES CA 90065 5679 016 024 CORONA DR ALIGNED PROPERTIES LLC 8207 BROOKGREEN RD DOWNEY CA 90240 5679 017 006 OBERLIN DR MOTLAGH,KATAYOUN 41420 30TH ST W PALMDALE CA 93551 5679 017 015 PALMER AVE SADJADI,NAVID AND 820 SHEVLIN DR EL CERRITO CA 94530 5683 032 006 EL REPOSO DR MERA, EDISON W 1007 S CATALINA AVE REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 5683 033 038 ROUND TOP DR MERA, EDISON W 1007 S CATALINA AVE REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 5867 005 018 CLOUDCREST RD ANANDA ASHRAMA 5301 PENNSYLVANIA AVE LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 1TOTAL VACANT/IMPROVED RECORDS
28 55 of 224

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2023

DECLARATION LIST

CITY OF GLENDALE
KEY OF 6, CITY CODE 255 (UNIMPROVED)
DATE: 01/03/23

LOCATION OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE ZIPPARCEL
615
TOTAL RECORDS 616

TOTAL UNIMPROVED RECORDS
29 56 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Amendment of the Agreement with CDM Constructors, Inc. for the Operation and Related Engineering Services for the Glendale Operable Unit for an Additional Five-Year Term.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City’s existing agreement with CDM for operation and related engineering services for the Glendale Operable Unit (GOU) will expire on March 27, 2023. CDM has proven to be a reliable plant operator, therefore, we would like to enter into annual amendments to extend, up to five additional years (March 28, 2023 - March 27, 2028. The annual operation costs for the GOU, at approximately $7,700,000, are paid directly by a trust account funded by the Glendale Respondent’s Group (“GRG”). There is no expected fiscal impact to the City in connection with the operation of the GOU.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Environmental Stewardship: The Glendale Operable Unit is a USEPA Superfund Groundwater Cleanup Project aimed to remove Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from the groundwater in the San Fernando Basin.

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into annual amendments to extend, up to five additional years (March 28, 2023 – March 27, 2028), the City’s current operations agreement with CDM Constructors, Inc. for the operation and related engineering services for the Glendale Operable Unit. The annual operation costs for the GOU, at approximately $7,700,000, are paid directly by a trust account funded by the Glendale Respondent’s Group.
57 of 224

24d
4 0
3 0

BACKGROUND
In 2000, CDM designed and built the GOU and has operated the GOU since then.

The GOU is comprised of nine extraction wells, the Glendale Water Treatment Plant (GWTP) and the pipelines to collect the raw groundwater and deliver it to the plant. The operation of the GOU is funded by the GRG pursuant to the Consent Decree issued in the matter of United States of America and State of California vs. ITT Industries, Inc., et al., case number 99-00552 MRP(ANx), (Consent Decree), which governs, among other items, the implementation of the GOU to remove Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from the Glendale area in which the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identified VOC contamination. The City is not a named defendant to the matter; the City voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction of the court and the Consent Decree for the implementation of the remedies for the removal of the VOCs.

The CDM agreement was initially between CDM and the GRG and was assigned to the City in April 2001 to continue the operation and maintenance of the GOU. Since then, the contract has been extended annually.

The City’s existing agreement with CDM for operation and related engineering services for the GOU expires on March 27, 2023. CDM offers technical expertise and institutional knowledge in the operation and improvements of the GOU. CDM also provides exceptional insurance coverages, which provide protection to the City on activities related to the operation of the GOU. The City has been very satisfied with CDM’s performance relative to the GOU and the City desires to annually extend the agreement with CDM. Additionally, the City’s experience with operation of the GOU has proven that CDM is a reliable plant operator in the long term, which is in contrast to other operable units that have had difficulty with the reliability of their operators.

ANALYSIS
The annual operational costs of the GOU are expected to be approximately $7,700,000.

These costs are paid by the GRG pursuant to the Consent Decree.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend annually, up to five additional years (March 28, 2023 - March 27, 2028), the City’s existing agreement with CDM for operation and related engineering services for the GOU facilities.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no expected fiscal impact to the City in connection with the operation of the GOU. All operational and maintenance costs related to the GOU are paid by the GRG per the governing Consent Decree.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This item is not subject to CEQA review. The Glendale Operable Unit is a USEPA Superfund Groundwater Cleanup Project aimed to remove Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from the groundwater in the San Fernando Basin pursuant to a Consent 58 of 224

34d
4 0
3 0
Decree. Additionally, the extension of the existing contract is considered a ministerial activity and, therefore, not subject to CEQA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744, the following are the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than ten percent interest in the company proposed for contract in this agenda item report:

Officers of CDM Constructors, Inc.:

Full Name Title Business City State Zip
Francesco M. Terrasi President 555 17th Street
Ste. 500
Denver CO 80202
Mario J. Marcaccio Secretary 75 State Street
Ste. 701
Boston MA 02109
Christopher
Campbell
Treasurer 75 State Street
Ste.701
Boston MA 02109
Luke Albert Assistant
Clerk/Secretary
555 17th Street
Ste. 500
Denver CO 80202
Thomas Visosky Assistant
Clerk/Secretary
600 Wilshire
Boulevard
Ste.750
Los
Angeles
CA 90017
Ownership Interest in more than ten percent (10%) in CDM Constructors, Inc.: None

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the City’s existing operational agreement with CDM, for operation and related engineering services for the GOU facilities, for annual terms of up to five additional years.

Alternative 2: Do not authorize a one-year extension to the existing contract to avoid disruption of the GOU operation, which provides 25% of the City’s drinking water supply, and to avoid a violation of the Consent Decree, and direct staff to prepare and issue a new Request for Proposals to seek and retain a consultant to operate the GOU facilities. However, this alternative would result in less favorable insurance coverage terms negotiated in the original contract, which are still in effect, and provide uncertainty in the long-term reliability of plant operators for the GOU. Additionally, any proposed operator to be selected, must be approved by the EPA, pursuant to the Consent Decree.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. 59 of 224

44d
4 0
3 0

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Michael E. De Ghetto, Chief Assistant General Manager – Water Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
None.
60 of 224

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, subject to approval by the City Attorney, to execute annual amendments with CDM Constructors, Inc., to extend their existing agreement, Contract No. 103529A, for the operation and related engineering services for the Glendale Operable Unit (GOU), for annual terms, for a total of five years (March 28, 2023 – March 27, 2028). Said amendments shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
61 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Acceptance of Grant Funds from the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS) State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation (SAEEI) for the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB) and the Early Care Education Pathways to Success (ECEPTS)

1. Motion to:
a) Accept funds from the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards, State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation Grant (SAEEI) in the amount of $592,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 to implement the expansion of Early Care & Education Registered Apprenticeship program;
b) Approve the award of SAEEI grant funds to the ECEPTS program, a project of The Tides Center, in the amount of $532,800 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 and to College & Career Engagement LLC, in the amount of $10,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025, as approved and recommended by the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB); and
c) Authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation (SAEEI) Grant was awarded by the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Division of Apprenticeship Standards, to the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB), in partnership with Early Care & Education Pathways to Success (ECEPTS), a project of The Tides Center. 62 of 224

24d
4 0
6 5
The VWDB will oversee the administration of the project and manage the grant funds to ensure that all contract deliverables and performance goals are met. ECEPTS will bring together partners, provide technical assistance and assist partnerships in implementing Early Childhood Education (ECE) pre-apprenticeships and apprenticeships in communities throughout the State of California, including the Verdugo region. The ECEPTS contract shall not exceed $532,800. In addition, current VWDB vendor, College & Career Engagement LLC will be allocated an amount not to exceed $10,000 to support the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) staff in overseeing and managing the project. The total amount of both contracts will not exceed, $542,800.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
NA

RECOMMENDATION
(1) Accept grant funds from the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards, State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation Grant (SAEEI) in the amount of $592,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 to implement the expansion of Early Care & Education Registered Apprenticeship program;
(2) Approve the award of SAEEI grant funds to the Early Care & Education Pathways to Success (ECEPTS), a project of The Tides Center, in the amount of $532,800 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 and to College & Career Engagement LLC, in the amount of $10,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025, as approved and recommended by the Verdugo Workforce Development Board; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding.

BACKGROUND
On November 4, 2022, the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB) staff received notification from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards that the State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation (SAEEI) Grant was awarded to the VWDB, in partnership with Early Care & Education Pathways to Success (ECEPTS), a project of The Tides Center. ECEPTS is a non-profit organization administered by the Tides Center and dedicated to implementing apprenticeships to expand the number of Early Childhood Education (ECE) teachers and teacher aides which in turn, expand the childcare and ECE opportunities for children of our communities. While the SAEEI is a statewide project, the VWDB and Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) staff have worked with ECEPTS over the past year to design apprenticeship programs that can be implemented 63 of 224

34d
4 0
6 5
in the Verdugo Region and partnered with this organization to serve as the administrative and passthrough entity for the SAEEI grant.

The VWDB is the planning and policy body for the Verdugo Consortium. The Verdugo Consortium is a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) comprised of the cities of Glendale, Burbank, and La Cañada Flintridge. The purpose of VWDB is to provide employment and training programs within the three cities and to allocate and award all Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) funds and general grant funds toward its goals.

Through the JPA, the City of Glendale is given responsibility for the administration of all Consortium activities, including acting as the recipient of WIOA and all other general grant funds received by the VWDB. As the administrative entity for the Verdugo Consortium, the City of Glendale and the Glendale City Council must approve all contracts and funding awards recommendations by the VWDB, which includes WIOA and non-WIOA funds.

As an experienced and effective grant administrator, VWDB was selected in November 2022 to assist in implementing this statewide project and administrating the grant funds.

The grant was awarded on July 1, 2022 and ECEPTS began the project at that time; however, DAS did not generate the sub-agreement until January 2023, and both DAS and ECEPTS turned to VWDB to administer the grant through the sub-agreement to ensure its success. The grant requires that administration of the funds be conducted by a local workforce board, such as VWDB. With childcare and ECE being a primary need of Verdugo participants who are trying to reenter the workforce, ECE has become a priority for the VWDB and VJC.

ANALYSIS
The VWDB will oversee the administration of the project and manage the grant funds to ensure that all contract deliverables and performance goals are met. ECEPTS will bring together partners, provide technical assistance and assist partnerships in implementing ECE pre-apprenticeships and apprenticeships in communities throughout the State of California, including the Verdugo region. The ECEPTS contract shall not exceed $532,800.

In addition, current VWDB vendor, College & Career Engagement LLC will be allocated an amount not to exceed $10,000 to support the VJC staff by overseeing partnerships, reviewing documentation of progress, reviewing the tracking and reporting of performance, coordinating projects and partnerships, and monitoring training provider contracts. The total amount of both contracts will not exceed the amount of $542,800,and the remaining grant funds of $49,200 will be used to cover Workforce staff costs. 64 of 224

44d
4 0
6 5

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The SAEEI partners will target English Language Learners, including immigrants, refugees and asylees, for this project. Parents that are low-income including those that receive public assistance, will also be a primary focus of this project. Partners will recruit participants from their own Headstart and ECE classes they operate. Parents must demonstrate they are low-income in order for their children to participate in Headstart and ECE; therefore, these parents comprise the target population for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The contracts for the project will cost $542,800. The grant award from DAS is $592,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025, which was appropriated as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time.

The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 49,200-
Admin
Workforce Staff
GL: 45656-2060-CSP-0020-P0000-
PL: CSP00952AG-DEPTCHARGE-
0000-2060
Workforce Fund
$ 532,800-
ECEPTS
Contract
GL: 43110-2060-CSP-0020-P0000-
PL: CSP00952AG- CNTRCTSVCS-
0000-2060
Workforce Fund
$ 10,000-
College &
Career
Engagement
LLC Contract
GL: 43110-2060-CSP-0020-P0000-
PL: CSP00952AG- CNTRCTSVCS-
0000-2060
Workforce Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Because no possibility exists that the activity in question (expanding ECE apprenticeships to create additional ECE teacher assistants) may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA review under the commonsense exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements. 65 of 224

54d
4 0
6 5

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize acceptance of SAEEI grant funds, award said grant funds to ECEPTS in the amount of $532,800 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025, and award to the College & Career Education LLC in the amount of $10,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025; and authorize the City Manager, or their designee to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept, and implement the funding.

Alternative 2: Do not authorize to award the contracts as recommended herein. This would prevent services being provided under the SAEEI grant.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Judith Velasco, Workforce Development Administrator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Minutes of the meeting of the Verdugo Workforce Development Board, January 18, 2023.
66 of 224

MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Accepts grant funds from the State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards, State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation Grant (SAEEI) in the amount of $592,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 to implement the expansion of Early Care & Education Registered Apprenticeship program;

2. Approves the award of SAEEI grant funds to the ECEPTS program, a project of The Tides Center, in the amount of $532,800 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025 and to College & Career Engagement LLC, in the amount of $10,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2025, as approved and recommended by the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB); and

3. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
67 of 224

VERDUGO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
1/18/2023
8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.

VWDB Executive Committee Minutes 1/18/2023 Page 1 of 2

MEMBERS PRESENT: Ara Aslanian, Alexis Carter, Marisol Espinoza, Nick Hacopian, Teresa Sanchez
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Diana Montecino, MaryAnn Pranke, Judith Velasco, Melissa Younesian
CALL TO ORDER: 8:35 am by Chair Ara Aslanian via WebEx

I. Introductions
A. Chair Ara Aslanian welcomed the Executive Committee.

II. Minutes of April 13, 2022, July 27, 2022, September 14, 2022, and October 12, 2022 A. Quorum confirmed.

B. Minutes presented and reviewed. MOTION: Marisol Espinoza 2nd: Nick Hacopian ACTION: APPROVED

III. Action Items
A. Approval to accept $112,197 of California Workforce Development Board funds to implement the State Prison to Employment program and assist justice involved individuals in entering or reentering the workforce

B. Approval to accept $650,000 of Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Governor’s Discretionary 25% Additional Assistance Grant to continue implementing a regional biotechnology technician industry-valued credential, and to enter into contract with Los Angeles Mission College for $100,000, Biocom Institute for $95,625, Consultant Bloom Strategies Solutions LLC for $40,000 and Copy & Design for $20,000

C. Approval to accept $592,000 of State Apprenticeship Expansion, Equity, and Innovation Grant funds to implement the Expansion of Early Care & Education Registered Apprenticeship Program. Approval to enter into contract with Early Care & Education Pathways to Success, a project of The Tides Center, for a total amount not to exceed $532,800 for their implementation of the apprenticeship program, and with College & Career Engagement for a total amount not to exceed $10,000 for their coordination support

D. Approval to add $35,999 of funds to the Foundation for California Community Colleges contract for a total amount not to exceed $149,999 and extend the contract from June 30, 2023 to June 30, 2024 to support paid work experience for the Early Childhood Education Pre-Apprenticeship Program

E. Approval to release the Verdugo Workforce Development Board’s Local Workforce Development Plan Modification 2022-2024 for public review and comment

IV. Director’s Report
A. Executive Director Judith Velasco reported that the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) and Bylaws continue to be under review by the City’s Attorney’s Office, but there is a delay due to the MOTION FOR CONSENT ITEMS A – E: Motion: Nick Hacopian 2nd: Alexis Carter

APPROVED
68 of 224

VERDUGO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
1/18/2023
8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.

VWDB Executive Committee Minutes 1/18/2023 Page 2 of 2

staffing changes in the department.

B. The Verdugo Jobs Center lease is set to expire March 31, 2023. Lease negotiations are underway with the building owner agreeing to pay for an American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Survey and pay for any work needed to remain in compliance with ADA up to $10,000.

The three-year lease will have a flat rate of $2.50 per square foot. The City of Glendale will draft the lease, which will then be presented to the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB) and City Council for approval.

C. The board’s Youth Provider, Glendale Youth Alliance, continues to work on the contract amendment for WIOA Out-of-School (OSY) for FY 21-22; recruiting for OSY continues to be a challenge.

V. Presentation: Verdugo Workforce Development Local Plan 2021-2024 Modification A. The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) requires that the Four-Year Local Workforce Development Plan be modified every two years. The modification is now complete for the 201-2024 Local Plan and is now ready for public review and comment.

B. The Local Plan guides oversight, policy development, resource allocation program development, and it sets priorities. The VWDB’s plan aligns with the Regional Plan, State Plan, and other plans such as California Adult Education Program (CAEP).

1. The VWDB’s Local Plan modifies the partnerships, target population, and professional development.

2. The following are addressed in the plan: Rapid Response and Layoff Aversion, Business and Career Services, WIOA I Priority of Service, Youth Services, Administration of Funds, and One-Stop Operator & Career Services Provider selection.

3. Data for the plan was gathered from public meetings including: Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) Partner meetings, GlendaleLEARNS, Glendale Continuum of Care Committee, BioTC, and VWDB meetings. The plan includes the following partner information:
a. Identified barriers that drive program and service development include: lack of technology, financial challenges due to inflation, fear of public transportation, language barriers, mismatch between skills of unemployed and skills in demand. b. The Local Community Early Childhood Education (ECE) employers identified the following barriers: housing, lack of support systems, access to nutrient dense food, parenting skills, and transportation.
c. BioTC feedback: not enough students entering biotechnology and biomanufacturing programs to build the qualified workforce to meet their hiring needs. d. Identified needs that are addressed in the modified Local Plan: supportive services, paid work-based learning, comprehensive career pathways, hybrid opportunities for education and training.

C. The Public Comment Period will run from January 20, 2023 through February 19, 2023 to meet the 30 day requirement.

1. The final Local Plan Modification will be presented to the VWDB for approval during the March 29
th Executive Committee Meeting and is due to the State by March 31st.

D. Ms. Velasco acknowledged MaryAnn Pranke for her work on the plan and engaging with stakeholders to gather their input.

VI. Other Businesses and Announcements:

A. The next Executive Committee meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, February 15, 2023.

VII. Public Comments: None

VIII. Adjournment: 9:03 am
69 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Ordinance Authorizing Entry into a Statutory Development Agreement between the City of Glendale and Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company in Connection with the Lucia Park Project (620 North Brand Boulevard and 625 North Maryland Avenue)

1. Ordinance for Development Agreement

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Development Agreement is proposed between the City of Glendale and Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the owner) for a 24-story, 294- unit residential project. The Development Agreement (“DA”) provides a six-year entitlement period and locks in the project’s current Development Impact Fees including the Public Use Facilities Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.10); Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.11); and Inclusionary Housing Requirements (GMC Section 30.35.060). The Development Agreement was originally introduced for adoption at the June 14, 2022 Council meeting when the City Council approved the project Stage II Final Design and adopted a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment.
70 of 224

27a
4 0
6 6

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Balanced, Quality Housing: Balanced, Quality Housing is the maintenance, reservation, and development of balanced housing opportunities.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the ordinance approving the Statutory Development Agreement between the City of Glendale and Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

BACKGROUND
On June 14, 2022, the City Council approved the Stage II Final Design Review Submission and adopted a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Lucia Park Project located at 620 N. Brand Boulevard and 625 North Maryland Avenue.

The Lucia Park project site is 1.48 acres and is bordered by Brand Boulevard to the west, the 134 Freeway to the north, Maryland Avenue to the east, and a six-story commercial office building and surface parking lot to the south. The site is developed with a six-story office building (Chase Bank/CoIdwell Banker) and a two-story parking structure with an attached 12,156 square-foot commercial building.

The project is a 294-unit, 24-story multi-family residential building that includes 373 subterranean parking spaces for the residential use and 129 above-ground spaces for the bank building; a publicly accessible open space plaza fronting Brand Boulevard; and residential amenity spaces throughout the Project. No changes are proposed to the commercial/bank building; the parking garage and attached commercial space would be demolished. No variances are required.

During the June 14, 2022 meeting, the City Council introduced an ordinance for adoption of a development agreement for the Project. An ordinance requires two hearings: an introductory hearing followed by a second public hearing to consider adoption of the ordinance. The second public hearing for the DA was not put on a subsequent agenda and the City Council did not consider adoption of the DA ordinance.

The DA is being brought to the City Council for consideration for adoption.

ANALYSIS
The DA (Exhibit 1) preserves the Project entitlements for a six (6) year term from the effective date of the DA (30-days after ordinance adoption). In addition, the DA locks in the current Development Impact Fees (impact and linkage fees, exactions, or fair share charges imposed on new development) including the Public Use Facilities Development 71 of 224

37a
4 0
6 6
Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.10) Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.11) and Inclusionary Housing Requirements (GMC Section 30.35.060). The DA incorporates the proposed Stage II Design, including the Publicly Accessible Open Space, and provides indemnification of the City, acknowledgements, agreements and assurances on the part of the Developer and the City. The City reserves the right to enact and implement future ordinances, rules, regulations and policies relating to uniform codes such as reach or stretch codes, Building Code, the California Building Standards Code, International Building Code or the Uniform Fire Code.

The DA was requested by the applicant to preserve the Project’s entitlements to allow additional time to ride out the continued financial instability resulting from the uneven economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and provide additional time to secure construction financing and subsequent preparation of construction documents, plan check and permitting.

On February 2, 2022, the DA was presented to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. The Planning Commission determined the DA is consistent with the City's General Plan and the DSP, and recommended approval with one comment. The Planning Commission recommended that the applicant/owner reach out to the skilled labor groups/unions regarding local hiring for construction. See Exhibit 2 for Planning Commission’s Motion.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Code requires publication of public notices when the City Council considers approval of entitlements. Staff published all required notices in the Glendale Independent newspaper and mailed copies to all property owners and occupants with 500 feet of the project site for all public meetings and hearings, including the original City Council meeting, and the site was duly posted. CEQA noticing requirements for the SCEA were met as well.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with approval of the DA. However, to the extent the DA facilitates the Project’s development, the Project would have a fiscal impact consistent with other quality downtown residential projects including new property taxes, building permit/plan check fees, and potential increased sales tax by expanding the downtown residential base. The Project would generate the following impact fees: (i) Inclusionary Housing ($13.5M); (ii) Park & Library Fee ($5.5M); and (iii) GUSD Fee ($857K).
72 of 224

47a
4 0
6 6

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On June 14, 2022, the City Council adopted a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (“SCEA”) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21155(b) that evaluated the potential environmental effects of the Project, and determined the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment with implementation of the identified mitigating measures. The DA would lock-in the Project’s entitlements and would not modify or revise the Project, and thus would not create any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects in the SCEA.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with Council direction pursuant to the adopted City Campaign Finance Ordinance, the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, subcontractors and any person or entity with 10% interest or more in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report is attached as Exhibit 3.

ALTERNATIVES
The following alternatives are presented for Council consideration:

Alternative 1: The City Council may approve the approving the DA. This Alternative would lock in the Project’s current entitlements and fee structure for six years; Alternative 2: The City Council may choose to not approve the Ordinance. This Alternative would cause the Project to lose its entitlements on June 14, 2024. Per GMC Section

30.41.015 the applicant could request a one-year time extension of the Project approvals if certain findings are met. Upon the expiration of the Project entitlements, the applicant would have to re-entitle a new project taking it through the City entitlement process including design review and CEQA.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Prepared by:

Mark Berry, Deputy Director of Community Development
Vilia Zemaitaitis, Principal Planner
Reviewed by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
73 of 224

57a
4 0
6 6
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1 Development Agreement
Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Recommendation
Exhibit 3 Campaign Finance Disclosure
74 of 224

(SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE)

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

CITY OF GLENDALE,
a California municipal corporation,
and
A

DELFIA PROPERTIES II, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company

THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED WITHIN TEN DAYS

OF EXECUTION BY ALL PARTIES HERETO PURSUANT TO
THE REQUIREMENTS OF GOVERNMENT CODE §65868.5
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER’S FEES
Pursuant to Government Code §§ 6103 and
27383
Recording requested by and when recorded
return to:

City Clerk
City of Glendale
613 E. Broadway, Room 110
Glendale, CA 91206
75 of 224

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

1. Recitals ...........................................................................................................................1

2. Definitions ......................................................................................................................2

3. Binding Effect ................................................................................................................5

4. Negation of Agency ....................................................................................................... 5

5. Development Impact Fees and Affordable Housing ......................................................5

6. Developer Covenants .................................................................................................... 6

7. Applicable Rules; Reserved Powers ...............................................................................6

8. Limitation on Application of Conflicting Requirements ...............................................8

9. Acknowledgments, Agreements and Assurances on the Part of Developer .................. 8

10. Acknowledgments, Agreements and Assurances on the Part of the City ...................... 8

11. Acknowledgements, Agreements, and Assurances on the Part of the Parties ............... 9

12. Cooperation and Implementation ..................................................................................10

13. Compliance; Default; Termination; Modifications and Amendments .........................11

14. Administration .............................................................................................................. 13

15. Term of Agreement ...................................................................................................... 13

16. Administration of Agreement and Resolution of Disputes .......................................... 14

17. Injunctive Relief ...........................................................................................................14

18. No Personal Liability .................................................................................................... 14

19. Mortgagee Protection ...................................................................................................14

20. Notices..........................................................................................................................15

21. Recordation. .................................................................................................................16

22. Severability and Termination ........................................................................................ 16

23. Time of Essence ........................................................................................................... 17

24. W aiver ..........................................................................................................................17

25. Enforced Delay; Extension Of Time Of Performance ................................................. 17

26. No Third Party Beneficiaries .........................................................................................17

27. Attorneys’ Fees............................................................................................................ 17

28. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................17

29. Authority to Execute; Binding Effect .......................................................................... 18

30. Entire Agreement; Conflicts.........................................................................................18

31. City Approvals and Actions .........................................................................................18

32. Counterparts .................................................................................................................18

33. Digital Signatures ........................................................................................................ 18

34. Integration ....................................................................................................................18

35. Interpretation ................................................................................................................19

36. Legal Advice .................................................................................................................19

37. Conflicts of Interest ......................................................................................................19

38. Assignment ...................................................................................................................19 76 of 224

ii
Page on Which
Exhibits First Referenced
Exhibit A Legal Description ............................................................................. 1 Exhibit B Project Site .......................................................................................1 Exhibit C Approved Project ..............................................................................1 Exhibit D Project Entitlements .........................................................................1 77 of 224

1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is made in Los Angeles County, California as of , 2023, by and between the CITY OF GLENDALE, a municipal corporation and charter city (the “City”), and ADELFIA PROPERTIES II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Developer”). Together, the City and Developer shall be referred to as the “Parties” or each individually a "Party."
RE
CITALS

1. Th
is Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the Parties:
(a) The City is authorized, pursuant to Government Code §§65864 through 65869.5, the Development Agreement Statutes, and under its authority as a charter city to enter into binding agreements with persons or entities having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to establish certainty in the development process; (b) Developer is the owner of the real property located at 620 North Brand and 625 North Maryland Avenue, in the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, described in Exhibit "A", (“Legal Description”), and as further depicted in Exhibit “B” (the " Site” or “Project Site”), both Exhibits being attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property").
(c) Developer proposes to construct a multi-family residential project on the Property, as further described in Exhibit "C", (the "Approved Project") located in the Gateway District (“District”) of the Downtown Specific Plan (“DSP”) area in the City of Glendal e, and Developer requests the Project entitlements, as further described in Exhibit "D". (d) The Project will provide the following benefits to the City, which include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) A new multi-family residential development in downtown Glendale in conformance with the DSP;
(2) An expanded property tax base and incidental sales tax revenues; (3) High quality design that contributes to the downtown’s unique sense of place, and provides an important component to a thriving downtown and city; (4) An increase in the population staying, working and recreating downtown, which will help reduce commuter traffic and other impacts on quality of life; (5) Employment opportunities for City residents during and after Project construction; and
78 of 224

2 (6) A public art contribution, made pursuant to the DSP art requirement, for use and enjoyment by downtown residents, visitors, and the general public. (e) On ___________ , the Planning Commission of the City held a duly noticed public hearing on Developer’s application for a Development Agreement and by motion recommended to the City Council approval of this Agreement based on a finding that the proposed Agreement is consistent with the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. (f) On June 14, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on Developer’s application for this Agreement and introduced an ordinance to implement this Agreement. The City Council approved and determined that:
(1) An environmental review has been conducted and the Project was determined to qualify for review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") using a Sustainable Communities Environmental Analysis (SCEA); and (2) A Stage I & II Design Review for the Project.
(g) On____________, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. approving this Agreement.
(h) Pursuant to Government Code §65867.5, the City Council of the City of Glendale (“City Council”) finds that: (i) this Agreement, the Applicable Rules and any Future Approvals (as defined herein) of the Project implement the goals and policies of the City of Glendale’s General Plan (“General Plan ”) and the DSP, provide balanced and diversified land uses and impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development and usage in order to maint ain the overall quality of life and the environment within the City; (ii) this Agreement, and the Project as depicted in the approved Stage I& II Project design, as shown on Exhibit “C” hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, is in the best interests of, and not a detriment to, the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City and the surrounding region; (iii) this Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in the zoning district and planning area in which the P roject Site is located; (iv) adopting this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan and DSP, and constitutes a present exercise of the City’s police power and in accordance with its authority as a charter city; and (v) this Agreement is being entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Government Code §65867.

2. Definitions. In this Agreement capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth below, or if not defined in this Section 2, shall have the meaning ascribed thereto when such terms are first used herein:
(a) “Agreement” means this Development Agreement by and between the City and Developer, including all exhibits attached hereto and all amendments and modifications thereto. (b) “Applicable Rules” are as defined in Section 7(a).
79 of 224

3 (c) “Approved Project” means the Project approved by the City on June 14, 2022, which consists of the City approved Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (“SCEA”) SCH Number 2022010297, Stage II Final Design Review Case No. PDR 2119308, and this Development Agreement (“DA”) City Case No. PDA1806045, all of which are as shown and described in Exhibits “C” and “D” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

(d) “Construction Period” shall mean the time period during which the Project is being constructed pursuant to the Approved Project attached hereto as Exhibit “C”.

(e) “Developer” means Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as developer of record, and any of their successors or assigns.

(f) “Developer Property” means property with a legal and equitable ownership held by Developer, and as identified on Site Map attached hereto as Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and described more particularly in the Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit “B” hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

(g) “Development Impact Fee(s)” means those impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, or fair share charges or other similar impact fees or char ges (collected as a condition to issuance of demolition, grading and/or building permits, or other permits) imposed by the City on and/or in connection with new development. Development Impact Fees do not include (i) Filing or Processing Fees; or (ii) other City-wide fees or charges of general applicability, provided that such City-wide fees or charges are not imposed on impacts of new development; (iii) impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar fees or charges imposed by other governmental entities and which the City is required to collect or assess pursuant to applicable law (e.g., school district impact fees pursuant to Government Code Section 65995).

(h) “Effective Date” is the date the Ordinance approving this Agreement becomes effective.

(i) “Enforced Delay” is defined in Section 25 below.

(j) “Filing or Processing Fees” means those fees uniformly charged by various City departments to cover the administrative costs of, among other things, reviewing and analyzing permit applications and similar requests for ministerial and/or discretionary approvals.

(k) “Future Approvals ” means any action approved by the City which implement development of the Project, including, without limitation, parcel maps, tentative subdivision maps, lot line adjustments, development plan, any applicable specific plan, site plan reviews, variances, conditional use permits, and approvals related to construction of off-site affordable housing, if any.

Future Approvals, as they may be granted from time to time, shall become part of the Applicable Rules.

(l) “Hazardous Materials” means any toxic substance, materials, or waste which is now regulated by any local governmental authority, the State of Calif ornia, or the United States Government under any Environmental Law including, but not limited to, any material or substance which is (i) defined as a "hazardous waste," "extremely hazardous waste," or "restricted hazardous waste" under Sections 25115, 25117, or 25122.7, or listed pursuant to Section 25140 of the 80 of 224

4 California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5 (Hazardous Waste Control Law), (ii) defined as a "hazardous substance" under Section 25316 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.8 (Carpenter -Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act), (iii) defined as a "hazardous material," "hazardous substance," or "hazardous waste" under Section 25501 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory), (iv) defined as a "hazardous substance" under 25281 of the California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.7 (Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances), (v) a petroleum or refined petroleum product, including without limitation petroleum-based paints and solvents, (vi) asbestos, (vii) polychlorinated biphenyls, (viii) methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), (ix) listed under Article 9 or defined as "hazardous" or "extremel y hazardous" pursuant to Article 11 of Title 22 of the California Administrative Code, Division 4, Chapter 20, (x) designated as a "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1317), (xi) defined as a "hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq. , (xii) defined as a "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §9601 e t seq. , (xiii) any flammable or explosive materials, (xiv) a radioactive material, or (xv) lead, cyanide, DDT, printing inks, acids, pesticides, ammonia compounds and other chemical products, asbestos, PCBs and similar compounds and including any different products and materials which have been found to have adverse effects on the environment or the health and safety of persons.
(m) “Improvements” means the Project to be constructed by Developer or by its tenants on the Project Site, pursuant to the Approved Project and the Applicable Rules and the Plans submitted by Developer and approved by the City.
(n) “Indemnitees” is defined in Section 12(d) below.
(o) “Minor Change” is defined in Section 11(a) below.
(p) “Mortgagee” is defined in Section 19 below.
(q) “Municipal Code” means the Glendale Municipal Code and all amendments thereto.
(r) “Periodic Review” is defined in Section 13(a) below. (s) “Plans” shall mean plans, specifications, drawings and other information required for the construction of the Improvements, which may include as applicable: (a) designs, locations and dimensions of Improvements, (b) site plans, (c) street level plans, (d) typical building floor plans, (e) key elevations and key building cross sections, (f) features in public areas, (g) landscape features, materials and sizes, (h) locations for signs and signage designs, (i) parking facilities with spaces indicated, (j) general construction techniques, (k) detailed tabulation of floor area by use, (l) structural dimensions and elevations, (
m) building materials and colors, all of which shall be consistent with the Approved Project, and (n) written requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship, and/or working drawings. (t) “Project” is defined in Recital 1(c) herein above.
81 of 224

5 (u) “Project Site” is defined in Recital 1(b) herein above.

(v) “Reserved Powers” means the rights and authority excepted from the restrictions of this Agreement on the City's police powers and which are instead reserved to the City. The Reserved Powers include the power to enact and implement rules, regulations, ordinances and policies after the Effective Date that are not in conflict with the Applicable Rules or that may be in conflict with the Applicable Rules but are permitted by Section 7 (b) of this Agreement.

(w) “Specific Plan” means the Glendale Downtown Specific Plan applicable to this Project.

(x) “Term” means the applicable period of time during which this Agreement shall be in effect and shall bind the City and Developer, as described in Section 15.

(y) Other terms not specifically defined in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Municipal Code or applicable Specific Plan.

3. Binding Effect . This Agreement, and all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall, to the extent permitted by law, constitute covenants which shall run with the land comprising the Project Site for the benefit thereof, and the benefits and burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective assigns, heirs, or other successors in interest.

4. Negation of Agency. The Parties acknowledge that by entering into and performing under this Agreement each is acting as an independent entity and not as an agent of the other in any respect. Nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the City and Developer joint venturers, partners, agents of the other, or employer/employee.

5. Development Impact Fees and Affordable Housing.

(a) This Agreement freezes the amount of Development Impact Fees, if any, that may be owed by this Project, including but not limited to any impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar impact fees or charges imposed on and in connection with Approved Project by the City pursuant to rules, regulations, ordinances and policies of the City, including but not limited to (i) Public Use Facilities Development Impact Fees pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code Chapter 4.10, (ii) Affordable Housing Development Impact Fees pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code Chapter 4.11, (iii) the In- Lieu Affordable Housing Fees pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code section 30.35.060, and (iv) except as otherwise provided in Section 7 of this Agreement, the Parties agree that this Project shall not be subject any increases in Development Impact Fees that may be imposed after the Effective Date of this Agreement.

(b) Developer shall comply with the Inclusionary Housing Requirements set forth in GMC Chapter 30.35 by: (i) paying the In-Lieu Fee amount, in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement, prior to the issuance of a temporary or final certificate of occupancy for the Approved Project (“Option 1)”); or (ii) 82 of 224

6 constructing the required inclusionary units on site (“Option 2”); or (iii) paying a combination of an In- Lieu Fee and constructing inclusionary units on- site (“Option 3”); or (iv) constructing the required inclusionary units off -site (“Option 4”); or (v) by acquiring and rehabilitating existing off-site market-rate units located in the City of Glendale and converting them to units affordable to low income households (“Option 5”).
(c) Prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement, Developer has not identified any off -site market-rate units that are both available to acquire and rehabilitate in order to pursue Option 5 compliance with GMC Chapter 30.35. If, however, following the Effective Date of this Agreement, Developer acquires and rehabilitates off-site existing market-rate units in compliance with GMC §30.35.075, with CEQA and with all other applicable Governmental Requirements, and Developer obtains a temporary or final certificate of occupancy for the Off Site Rehab Units prior to the issuance of a temporary or final certificate of occupancy of the Approved Project, then Developer shall be in compliance with GMC Chapter 30.35.

6. Developer Covenants. Developer covenants and agrees the covenants contained in this Agreement run with the land, and that should Developer construct the Approved Project, and for so long as the Approved Project is in existence, Developer shall operate and maintain the Approved Project in accordance with the conditions of the Project entitlements contained in Exhibit “D” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be modified from time to time in compliance with the provisions of the Glendale Municipal Code ("GMC") .

In addition, Developer may seek subsequent modifications to the Approved Project as it pertains to Design Review procedures set forth in GMC section 30.47, and subject to the applicable processes for Minor Changes and amending or modifying this Agreement, as the case may be, as provided for in this Agreement and as required by the California Government Code.

7. Applicable Rules; Reserved Powers. The development standards and restrictions set forth in this Section 7 shall govern the use and development of the Project and the Project Site and shall constitute the Applicable Rules, except as subject to the Reserved Powers and otherwise provided herein.
(a) Applicable Rules. The following shall be part of the Applicable Rules, in effect as of the Effective Date of this Agreement:
(1) The General Plan;
(2) Downtown Specific Plan;
(3) The Municipal Code (including the Zoning Code) to the extent it is not amended or superseded by the Downtown Specific Plan;
(4) Such other ordinances, rules, regulations, and official policies of the City governing permitted uses of the Project, and density, design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Project and to the extent they are not superseded by the Downtown Specific Plan;
83 of 224

7 (5) This Agreement and Exhibits and all attachments thereto;

(6) The Approved Project and all Future Approvals; and

(7) The permit fees and all other applicable fees, except those set forth in Section 5 herein above, will be assessed at the time that they are required, and are not fixed as a part of this Agreement. Notwithstanding this provision, the amount of the City’s sewer mitigation fee, if any, shall be fixed in the sum applicable to the Project of the date of final approval of the Project, May 22, 2018.

(b) Public Open Space. The Project shall comply with the public open space standards required in Section 5.4, Open Space Design Standards and Guidelines, of the Downtown Specific Plan, in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement.

(c) Reserved Powers . Notwithstanding any provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, the City reserves the right through its Reserved Powers, as defined herein below, to enact and implement:

(1) Ordinances, rules, regulations and policies relating to uniform codes, including reach or stretch codes adopted by City or by the State of California, such as, but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, the California Building Standards Code, International Building Code as adopted by the California Building Standards Commission, National Electrical Code, Uniform Mechanical Code or Uniform Fire Code, as amended (including those amendments to the promulgated uniform codes which reflect local modification to implement the published recommendations of the multi- state organization and which are applicable City -wide), and the application of such uniform codes to the Project at the time of application for issuance of building permits for structures on the Project Site including such amendments to uniform codes as the City may adopt from time to time;

(2) Rules, regulations, ordinances and/or policies determined by the City to be necessary in order to prevent or remedy conditions dangerous to the health and safety of City residents;

(3) In the event that State or Federal laws or regulations prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations; provided, however, that this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall not adopt or undertake any regulation, program or action or take any action required by State or Federal laws or regulations which is/are inconsistent with or in conflict with this Agreement until it has met and discussed the proposed action with Developer;

(4) The City shall retain all of its discretion with respect to determinations regarding requests for Future Approvals consistent with the Applicable Rules and this Agreement. 84 of 224

8 8. Limitation on Application of Conflicting Requirements. This Agreement shall not preclude the application to the Project of rules, regulations, ordinances and officially adopted plans and policies not in conflict with the Applicable Rules.

9. Acknowledgments, Agreements and Assurances on the Part of Developer. In order to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement, and in consideration for the City entering into this Agreement and obligating itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth herein, Developer hereby agrees and acknowledges that:
(a) Construction of Project. The Project, including the Improvements, shall be constructed pursuant to this Agreement and the Applicable Rules. (b) Other Governmental Permits. Developer shall apply in a timely manner for such other permits and approvals as may be required from other governmental or quasi - governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Project for the development of, or provision of services to, the Project. The City shall cooperate with Developer in its endeavors to obtain such permits and approvals, but Developer shall have no separate cause of action against the City under this Section 9 if Developer fails to obtain such permits and approvals.

10. Acknowledgments, Agreements and Assurances on the Part of the City . In order to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement, and in consideration for Developer entering this Agreement and obligating itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth in the preceding Section of this Agreement, the City hereby agrees and acknowledges that:
(a) Entitlement to Develop. Developer is hereby granted the vested right to develop the Project on the Project Site to the extent and in the manner provided in this Agreement, subject to and in accordance with the Applicable Rules, Reserved Powers, and the Future Approvals. The City hereby grants and Developer shall have the vested right to develop and construct the Project in accordance with the Applicable Rules, subject to termination of this Agreement as set forth hereinafter. The vested right to develop and construct the Project includes an extension of the life of the Project Approvals for the Term of this Agreement. (b) Conflicting Enactments. With the exception of those changes authorized by the Reserved Powers, as defined herein in Section 7 (b), any other change in the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, any change in the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, zoning, subdivision or building regulation, adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, and adopted in any form by the City Council, the Planning Commission or any other board, commission or department of the City, or any officer or employee thereof, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Project Site and which would conflict in any way with or be more restrictive than the Applicable Rules shall not be applied by the City to any part of the Project Site. If Developer elects to have any such change made part of the Applicable Rules, then Developer shall give the City written notice of its election to have such change in the Applicable Rules applied to such portion of the Project and/or Project Site, in which case such change shall be deemed to be an Applicable Rule insofar as that portion of the Project and/or Project Site is concerned. 85 of 224

9 (c) Permitted Conditions. Provided Developer’s applications for any Future Approvals are consistent with this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, the City shall review and consider, subject to the Reserved Powers, including Section 7 (b)(4), such Future Approvals in accordance with the Applicable Rules and this Agreement and subject to the City’s review as applicable, authorize development of the Project Site for the uses and to the density and regulations as described herein. The City shall have the right to impose conditions in connection with Future Approvals provided, however, that such conditions and dedications shall not be inconsistent with this Agreement or the Applicable Rules.

11. Acknowledgements, Agreements, and Assurances on the Part of the Parties. In order to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement, and in consideration for the Parties entering this Agreement and obligating themselves to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth in the preceding Section of this Agreement, the Parties hereby agree and acknowledge that:

(a) Administrative Changes and Amendments . The Parties acknowledge that further planning and development of the Project may demonstrate that refinements and changes are appropriate with respect to the details and performance of the Parties under this Agreement. The Parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect to the details of the Project development and with respect to those items covered in general terms under this Agreement. If and when the parties find that “Minor Changes”, as herein defined, ar e necessary or appropriate, they shall, unless otherwise required by law, effectuate such changes or adjustments through administrative amendments executed by Developer and the City Manager or their designee, pursuant to the processes established through the Applicable Rules and Reserved Powers. As used herein, “Minor Changes” are changes, modifications or adjustments, which are consistent with the Applicable Rules, and which do not materially alter the overall nature, scope, or design of the Project, incl uding, without limitation, minor changes in locations of buildings, streets, or infrastructure, configuration and size of parcels or lots (including lot line adjustments), or development of the infrastructure, provided, however, that any Minor Changes shall be subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 11 of this Agreement. Minor Changes shall not be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement under Government Code section 65868, and unless otherwise required by law, no such administrative amendments shall require prior notice or hearing by the Planning Commission or City Council.

12. Cooperation and Implementation. The City and Developer agree that they will cooperate with one another to the fullest extent reasonable and feasible to implement this Agreement. Such cooperation shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

(a) Further Assurances; Covenant to Sign Documents. Each Party shall take all actions and do all things, and execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit, if required, any and all documents and writings, including estoppel certificates, which may be necessary or proper to achieve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. The Party requesting the herein described actions, including the execution of any documents, writings and estoppel certificates (collectively documents), shall pay for all legal and other consulting fees and/or costs incurred by the City in reviewing such documents.

(b) Processing. Upon satisfactory completion by Developer of all required preliminary actions and payments of appropriate filing or processing fees, if any, the City shall, 86 of 224

10 subject to all legal requirements, promptly initiate, diligently process, and complete all required steps, and promptly act upon any approvals and permits necessary for the development by Developer in accordance with this Agreement.
(c) Defense of Agreement. The City and Developer agree to cooperate, and to timely take all actions necessary or required to uphold the validity and enforceability of this Agreement, Applicable Rules, and Reserved Powers subject to the indemnification provisions of Section 12 (d) herein below. The City and Developer shall promptly notify one another of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. (d) Indemnification. Developer shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) the City, their officers, agents and employees, (the “Indemnitees”), from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, judgments, attorneys’ fees and/or liabilities which arise from (i) the performance of this Agreement by Developer or Developer's ownership, development, use, or operation of the Project on the Site or any portion thereof, pursuant to this Agreement, excepting those liabilities which are caused by the Indemnitees' (or any of them) gross negligence or willful misconduct, and (ii) any litigation challenging the validity and/or sufficiency of the environmental review and/or land use entitlements for the Project. The City agrees to work w ith Developer to discuss and effectuate settlement of any litigation hereunder where it is in the Parties’ best interests to do so. Indemnitees and Developer, upon mutual consent, shall have the right to require that any case be handled through an alternative dispute resolution process. The City and Developer agree to fully cooperate with one another in any case where no conflict of interest between the Parties exist. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Developer specifically agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees from any liabilities resulting from Developer's failure to comply with all laws applicable to the Project on the Project Site.

13. Compliance; Default; Termination; Modifications and Amendments. (a) Review of C ompliance. During the term of this Agreement, the City shall review this Agreement on or before each anniversary of the Effective Date (“Periodic Review”) in order to determine whether Developer is in good faith compliance with any specific term or provisi on of this Agreement. At the commencement of each Periodic Review, the Director shall notify Developer in writing that the Periodic Review will commence or has commenced. The City shall notify Developer regarding any alleged non-compliance on the part of Developer.

Within thirty
(30) days after receipt of the Director’s notice that the Periodic Review will commence or has co
mmenced (and unless Developer requests and is granted a waiver by the City), the City may request Developer to demonstrate good faith compliance with this Agreement. (1) Non-Compliance/Default by Developer. In addition to the Periodic Review process set forth in this Section 13, in the event Developer does not perform its obligations under this Agreement in a timely manner, the City shall have those rights and remedies provided for in this Agreement.
(2) Notice of Non -Compliance/Default. With respect to any non - compliance/default under this Agreement, the City shall submit to Developer, by registered or 87 of 224

11 certified mail return receipt requested, a written notice of default in the manner prescribed in Section 20 herein, identifying with specificity those obligations of Developer, which have not been performed. Upon receipt of the notice of non -compliance/default, Developer shall promptly commence to cure the identified defaults(s) at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of the notice of default and shall complete the cure of such default(s) not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the notice of default, or such longer period as is reasonably necessary to remedy such default(s), provided that Developer shall continuously and diligently pursue such remedy at all times until such default(s) is cured. Pursuant to Section 19, Mortgagees may be entitled to notice of any default by Developer hereunder and an additional period on which to cure such default.

(3) Developer Failure to Cure Non-Compliance/Default Procedure. If, after the cure period has elapsed, the City finds and determines that (i) Developer has not demonstrated that it is in compliance with this Agreement, and (ii) Developer is out of compliance with a specific, substantive term or any provision of this Agreement, then the City shall first notify Developer in writing and then shall make a report to the City Council and set a public hearing before the City Council in accordance with the notice and hearing requirements of Government Code sections 65867 and 65868. If, after public hearing, the City Council finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not cured the default pursuant to this Section, then the City may terminate or modify this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, non-performance by either Party shall be excused when it is delayed unavoidably and beyond the reasonable control of the Parties as a result of any of the events identified in Section 25 of this Agreement.

(b) Developer Default. Subject to the cure period set forth in this paragraph and Force Majeure (as defined herein in Section 25), and provided that Developer elects to commence Project construction, failure by Developer to construct, operate and maintain the Approved Project as required by this Agreement, and following notice and failure to cure as described hereafter, constitutes a “Default” under this Section of the Agreement, and entitles the City to institute legal actions pursuant to Section 13 or as otherwise permitted by this Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, the City shall not institute any proceeding against Developer and Developer shall not be in Default if within sixty (60) days from receipt of the notice required by this Section 13, Developer promptly and with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay within such sixty (60) day period and diligently prosecutes such cure to completion. In addition to any other remedies, the City has the option, in its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement if Developer fails to cure the Default.

(c) Institution of Legal Actions . In addition to any other rights or remedies and subject to the restrictions otherwise set forth in this Agreement, the City may institute an action at law or equity to seek specific performance of the terms of this Section 13 of the Agreement, or to cure, correct or remedy the Default, to collect on the Performance Bond as set forth in, and subject to the limitations of, the following subsection, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, in an appropriate municipal court in that county, or in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

(d) Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either 88 of 224

12 party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. The right of the City to collect on the Performance Bond under a Developer Default shall be limited, whether in a single action or cumulatively, to an aggregate amount of the Performance Bond, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees, if any. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the City shall not be entitled to consequential or punitive damages.

(e) Inaction Not a Waiver of Default . Any failures or delays by either P arty in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any Default shall not operate as a waiver of any Default or of any such rights or remedies, or deprive either such party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies.

(f) Termination of Agreement . Subject to compliance with Government Code section 65868, the City may terminate this Agreement, after final determination of the City Council, on the basis of substantial evidence that Developer has not cured its Default within the applicable cure period. Following the transfer of the Property, or any portion thereof, to a permitted transferee, this Agreement may only be terminated with respect to the transferred parcel on account of a default by the owner of such transferred parcel, and no such default shall result in termination of this Agreement with respect to the portion of the Project Site retained by Developer.

(g) Non-Compliance/Default by the City . With respect to any non - compliance/default under this Agreement, Developer shall submit to the City, by registered or certified mail return receipt requested, a written notice of default in the manner prescribed in Section 20 herein, identifying with specificity those obligations of the City which have not been performed. Upon receipt of the notice of non- compliance/default, the City shall promptly commence to cure the identified defaults(s) at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of the notice of default and shall complete the cure of such default(s) not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the notice of default, or such longer period as is reasonably necessary to remedy such default(s), provided that the City shall continuously and diligently pursue such remedy at all times until such default(s) is cured.

(h) Modification or Amendment . Notwithstanding Section 11(a) herein above pertaining to Administrative Amendments, and subject to the notice and hearing requirements of the Development Agreement Statute, this Agreement may be modified or amended from time to time only with the written consent of Developer and the City or their successors and assigns in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Government Code section 65868. As a condition precedent to the City's execution of any amendment of this Agreement, Developer shall deliver to the City a preliminary title report with respect to the portions of Developer's Property to be affected by such amendment, together with a no tice stating that the mortgagees listed in such report will be entitled to notice of and consent to such amendment pursuant to Section 20 of this Agreement.

14. Administration. This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager, or their de signated representative, following approval of this Agreement by the City.

The City shall maintain authority of this Agreement through the City Manager (or their authorized representative). The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations, waive 89 of 224

13 provisions, extend time limits, make minor modifications to City design approvals, and/or revise this Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not conflict with the substantive provisions of this Agreement, substantially change the uses, floor area, or development permitted on the Project Site pursuant to the Scope of Development, or add to the City costs, or conflict with the Applicable Rules. All waivers of this Agreement shall comply with Section 23 of this Agreement. All amendments of this Agreement, other than those minor changes described in this Section 11(a), shall comply with Section 13(h) of this Agreement pertaining to Modifications or Amendments.

15. Term of Agreement. Except for the covenants contained herein in Section 6 which run with the land, this Agreement shall become operative on the Effective Date and the Term shall end six (6) years after the Effective Date of this Agreement, unless this Agreement is terminated, modified or extended upon mutual written consent of the Parties hereto or as otherwise provided by this Agreement. Prior to expiration of the term of the Agreement, Developer shall obtain the required demolition, grading and building permits for the Approved Project and commence construction; provided, however, and for avoidance of doubt, Developer’s failure to obtain the required demolition, grading and building permits during the term of this Agreement shall not operate to extend this Agreement’s term. Following expiration or termination of the Term hereof, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect. The Term shall be automatically extended by the number of days equal to the number of days that any Enforced Delay as defined in Section 25 was in effect. Notwithstanding this provision, Developer shall make its best efforts to diligently construct the Project in the minimum feasible timeframe.

16. Administration of Agreement and Resolution of Disputes . All disputes involving the enforcement, interpretation or administration of this Agreement shall first be subject to good faith negotiations between the Parties to resolve the dispute. In the event the dispute is not resolved by negotiations, the Parties shall be permitted to pursue any remedy provided for under this Agreement or otherwise available under applicable law or judicial decision, whether at law or in equity. No remedy or election hereunder shall be deemed exclusive but shall, wherever possible, be cumulative with all other remedies available to any Party.

17. Injunctive Relief. Any Party to the dispute may, in addition to any other rights or remedies provided by this Agreement, seek to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforce by specific performance the obligations and rights of the Parties hereto, except as otherwise provided herein.

18. No Personal Liability . No board member, councilmember, official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Developer in the event of any default or breach by the City for any amount which may become due to Developer or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.

19. Mortgagee Protection. This Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer, in any manner, at Developer’s sole discretion, from encumbering the Developer Property or any portion thereof or any Improvements thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device, including but not limited to, a mezzanine loan. The City acknowledges that the lender(s) providing such financing (“Mortgagee”) may, from time to time, request the City issue
90 of 224

14 interpretations of this Agreement. The City agrees to respond to Mortgagee requests for City interpretation of this Agreement within a reasonable time period. The City retains sole and absolute discretion over any interpretations of this Agreement issued by the City. Any Mortgagee of a mortgage or a beneficiary of a deed of trust or any successor or assign thereof, including without limitation the purchaser at a judicial or non -judicial foreclosure sale or a person or entity who obtains title by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on the Developer Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges:
(a) Mortgage Not Rendered Invalid. Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the priority of the lien of any mortgage, deed of trust, or other loan or security device on the Developer Property made in good faith and for value. No Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform Developer’s obligations, or to guarantee such performance, prior to taking title to all or a portion of the Property.
(b) Request for Notice to Mortgagee. The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Developer Property, or any part thereof, who has submitted a request in writing to the City in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive a copy of any notice of non-compliance/default delivered to Developer. (c) Mortgagee’s Time to Cure. The City shall provide a copy of any notice of non - compliance/default to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of non- compliance/default to Developer. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default for a period of sixty (60) days after receipt of such notice of non- compliance/default. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such default shall be a default which can only be remedied by such Mortgagee obtaining possession of Developer's Property, or any portion thereof, and such Mortgagee seeks to obtain possession, such Mortgagee shall have until sixty (60) days after the date of obtaining such possession to cure or, if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such period, to commence to cure such default, provided that such default is cured no later than one (1) year after Mortgagee obtains such possession. (d) Cure Rights. Any Mortgagee who takes title to all of the Developer Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or a deed in lieu of foreclosure, shall succeed to the rights and obligations of Developer under this Agreement as to the Developer Property or portion thereof so acquired; provided, however, in no event shall such Mortgagee be liable for any defaul ts or monetary obligations of Developer arising prior to acquisition of title to the Property by such Mortgagee, except that any such Mortgagee shall not be entitled to a building permit or occupancy certificate until all delinquent and current fees and other monetary or nonmonetary obligations due under this Agreement for the Developer Property, or portion thereof acquired by such Mortgagee, have been satisfied. (e) Bankruptcy. If any Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature of foreclosure by any process or injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings involving Developer, the times specified in Section 16(c) above shall be extended for the period of the prohibition, except that any such extension shall not extend the term of this Agreement.
91 of 224

15 (f) Disaffirmation. If this Agreement is terminated as to any portion of the Developer Property by reason of (i) any default or (ii) as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement is disaffirmed by a receiver, liquidator, or trustee for Developer or its property, the City, if requested by any Mortgagee, shall negotiate in good faith with such Mortgagee for a new development agreement for the Project as to such portion of the Developer Property with the most senior Mortgagee requesting such new agreement. This Agreement does not require any Mortgagee or the City to enter into a new development agreement pursuant to this Section 19.

20. Notices. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when personally received by the addressee, or within three (3) calendar days after deposit in the United States mail by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the following Parties and their counsel at the addresses indicated below; provided, however, if any Party to this Agreement delivers a notice or causes a notice to be delivered to any other Party to this Agreement, a duplicate of that Notice shall be concurrently delivered to each other Party and their respective counsel. Such notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below:

To City: City of Glendale
633 E. Broadway, Suite 201
Glendale, California 91206-4387
Attention: Community Development Director
[email protected]
Fax: (818) 240-7913

With copies to: City of Glendale, City Attorney’s Office 613 East Broadway, Suite 220
Glendale, California 91206
Attention: Gillian van Muyden,
Chief Assistant City Attorney
[email protected]

Fax: (818) 547-3402

To Developer: Adelfia Properties II, LLC
620 North Brand, Suite 402
Glendale California 91203
Attention: Ralph Cimmarusti
Fax: (323) 275-9663

With copy to: Jeffer Mangels Butler Mitchell LLP
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7
th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Attention: Sheri Bonstelle, Esq.
[email protected]

Fax: (310) 712-3377
92 of 224

16 Notice given in any other manner shall be effective when received by the addressee. The addresses for notices may be changed by notice given in accordance with this provision.

21. Recordation. As provided in Government Code Section 65868.5, the City Clerk of Glendale shall record a copy of this Agreement with the Registrar -Recorder of the City of Glendale within ten (10) days following the execution of the Agreement by all Parties.

22. Severability and Termination. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, or if any provision of this Agreement is superseded or rendered unenforceable according to any law which becomes effective after the Effective Date, the remainder of this Agreement shall be effective to the extent the remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform when taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement.

23. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each provision of this Agreement of which time is an element.

24. Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought.

25. Enforced Delay; Extension of Time of Performance. Required performance by either Party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in Default, and all performance and other dates specified in this Agreement shall be extended, where delays or Defaults are due to: litigation challenging the validity of this transaction or any element thereof or the right of either Party to engage in the acts and transactions contemplated by this Agreement; litigation challenging the Project approvals, or enjoining performance under this Agreement; litigation impairing Developer's ability to perform any act required under this Agreement; a referendum filed challenging this Agreement; inability to secure necessary labor materials or tools; actions in connection with the remediation of Hazardous Materials, including groundwater contamination; withdrawal of financing not caused by any act or omission of Developer; war; insurrection; strikes; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; acts of terrorism; epidemics; pandemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental restrictions or priority; moratoria related to building, sewer, water, planning or other items; unusually severe weather; acts or omissions of the other Party; acts or failures to act of the City or any other public or governmental agency or entity; or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period reasonably attributable to the enforced delay and shall run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within sixty (60) days of the commencement of the cause.

Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of the City and/or Developer. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the lack of funding to complete the Improvements shall not constitute grounds for enforced delay pursuant to this Section 25.

26. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of Developer and the City and their successors and assigns. There are 93 of 224

17 no third party beneficiaries and this Agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed, to benefit or be enforceable by any other person or entity.

27. Attorneys’ Fees . If any Party commences any action for the interpretation, enforcement, termination, cancellation or rescission of this Agreement or for specific performance for the breach hereof, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees, arbitration expenses and costs, and litigation expenses and costs arising from the action. Attorneys’ fees under this Section shall include attorneys’ fees on any appeal as well as any attorneys’ fees incurred in any post-judgment proceedings to collect or enforce the judgment.

28. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and the venue for any legal actions brought by any Party with respect to this Agreement shall be the County of Los Angeles, State of California for state actions and the Central District of California for any federal actions.

29. Authority to Execute; Binding Effect. Developer represents and warrants to the City that it has th e power and authority to execute this Agreement and, once executed, this Agreement shall be final, valid, binding and enforceable against Developer in accordance with its terms. The City represents and warrants to Developer that (a) all public notices and public hearings have been held in accordance with law and all required actions for the adoption of this Agreement have been completed in accordance with applicable law; (b) this Agreement, once executed by the City, shall be final, valid, binding and enforceable against the City in accordance with its terms; and (c) this Agreement may not be amended, modified, changed or terminated in the future by the City except in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.

30. Entire Agreement; Conflict s. This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto represent the entire agreement of the Parties. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. Should any or all of the provisions of this Agreement be found to be in conflict with any other provision or provisions found in the Applicable Rules, then the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

31. City Approvals and Actions. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by the City, the City Manager or their designee is authorized to act on behalf of the City unless specifically provided otherwise or the context should require otherwise.

32. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and which, when signed by all Parties, shall constitute a binding agreement.

33. Digital Signatures. The Parties consent to the use of electronic signatures for this Agreement in compliance with State and Federal law. The Parties deem a copy of this Agreement, or any amendment to it, that bears a digital signature as having the same legal effect, for all purposes, as delivery of a signed original of t his Agreement or the amendment, and each digital signature will have the same legal force and effect as a handwritten signature. 94 of 224

18 34. Integration. This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto contains the entire understanding between the Parties relating to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged in this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each Party is entering this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each Party’s own independent investigation of any and all facts such Party deems material. This Agreement includes Exhibits “A” through “C,” (each such Exhibit incorporated in this Agreement as if fully set forth herein) which together constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties, notwithstanding any previous negotiations or agreements between the Parties or their predecessors-in-interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof.

35. Interpretation. As used in this Agreement, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The word “including” shall be construed as if followed by the words “without limitation.” This Agreement shall be interpreted as though prepared jointly by both Parties.

36. Legal Advice. Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following: they have carefully read this Agreement, and in signing this Agreement, they do so with full knowledge of any right which they may have; they have received independent legal advice from their respective legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement, or have knowingly chosen not to consult legal counsel as to the matters set forth in this Agreement; and, they have freely signed this Agreement without any reliance upon any agreement, promise, statement or representation by or on behalf of the other Party, or their respective agents, employees or attorneys, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, and without duress or coercion, whether economic or otherwise.

37. Conflicts of Interest. No member, official or employee of the City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects their personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is directly or indirectly interested.

38. Assignment. The burdens of the Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest and assigns of the Parties to the Agreement. The Parties shall provide thirty (30) days advance written notice of any assignment, and the notice shall be in compliance with Section 20 herein. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]
95 of 224

19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

By:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MICHAEL J. GARCIA, CITY ATTORNEY

By:

Gillian van Muyden,
Chief Assistant City Attorney
ADELFIA PROPERTIES II, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company

By:

ATTEST:

Aram Adjemian, City Clerk
96 of 224

20 EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 1:

L
OT 5 OF MCNUTT TRACT, IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 160 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

P
ARCEL 2:

L
OTS 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 AND 26 OF TRACT NO. 93, IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 14, PAGES 22 AND 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

P
ARCEL 3:

T
HAT PORTION OF LOTS 18 AND 27 OF TRACT NO. 93, IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 14, PAGES 22 AND 23 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

B
EGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 27; THENCE FROM A TANGENT WHICH BEARS NORTH 16 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 72 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 16 SECONDS AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT NORTHERLY 7.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 18; THENCE EASTE RLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST, 271.27 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHERLY, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, 280.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

APN: 5643-018-031, 5643-018-032
97 of 224

21 EXHIBIT “B”

PROJECT SITE DEPICTION

98 of 224

22 EXHIBIT “C”

APPROVED PROJECT
The Approved Project has the following project description:
- Demolition of the existing two-story building, parking structure, and associated surface parking lot;
- Retention of the Chase Bank building on the site, and replacement of the Chase Bank 129 parking spaces in the Project; and
Construction of:
- A maximum 294-unit multi-family residential project;
- Parking in compliance with the Glendale Municipal Code 30.32.050, and the Approved Project includes 502 total parking spaces, including 373 residential parking spaces, 129 commercial parking spaces and code-required bicycle parking;
- Open space in compliance with the Municipal Code, which includes 6,994 sf of publicly accessible open space and 8,867 square feet of residential common open space for a total of 15,844 sf of Project open space on the ground floor, as well as the residential common open space and private open space totaling 41,160 sf;
- Additional amenities, including but not limited to, landscaping, outdoor and private terraces, pool, and community spaces;
- A maximum FAR of 7.5:1 by right, and the Approved Project has a floor area of 417,135 square feet of new residential building and 45,125 square feet of the existing Chase Bank building on a

1.46 acre (63,760 sf) project site; and
- A maximum height of 275 feet by right, and the Approved Project includes twenty -four (24) stories and 265.5 feet.”
99 of 224

23 EXHIBIT “D”

PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS
The City made findings and approved, as appropriate, the following entitlements for the Approved Project on :

1. SCEA - Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment, SCH Number 2022010297

2. Stage II Final Design Review Case No. PDR 2119308

3. Development Agreement (“DA”) Case No. PDA1806045: A Development Agreement between the City of Glendale and Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5. The DA provides a six (6) year entitlement period for the Project. The DA freezes the current Development Impact Fees (impact and linkage fees, exactions, or fair share charges imposed on new development) for the project including the Public Use Facilities Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.10); Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.11); and Inclusionary Housing Requirements (GMC Section

30.35.060).

The Project Entitlements are kept in the official records of and available for review in the Office of the Glendale City Clerk.
100 of 224

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

IN CONNECTION WITH THE LUCIA PARK PROJECT
LOCATED AT 620 NORTH BRAND BOULEVARD AND 625 NORTH MARYLAND AVENUE,

GLENDALE, CA

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine as follows:

a. The Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing, pursuant to the provisions of Section 30.61 of the Glendale Municipal Code, California Government Code Sections 65090 and 65091 and Chapter 3, Title 7 of the Government Code of the State of California, on February 2, 2022.
b. The Planning Commission closed the public hearing on February 2, 2022. c. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered all materials, communications, public testimony, maps and exhibits of current record on said Development Agreement.

SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and on its behalf, the Planning Commission further finds and determines that the proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan, and that the proposed action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. Specifically, said action is consistent with the following policies of the Glendale General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan:

a. Encourages a city with a wide range of housing types to meet the needs of current and future residents (Land Use Element, Residential Goal 1)
o Housing Element Policy 1.3 directs the City to provide higher density residential development in close proximity to public transportation, services and recreation. o Housing Element Policy 1.4 directs the City to continue to promote residential/mixed use development in appropriate locations.
o Housing Element Policy 1.5 encourages the development of residential units in the downtown area and along appropriate commercial corridors b. Encourage a city with high quality residential neighborhoods that are attractive and well designed (Land Use Element, Residential Goal 1).
c. Support the creation of higher density residential development in those areas best suited from the standpoint of accessibility, current development, community organization, transportation and circulation facilities and economic feasibility. (Land Use Element, Residential Goal 4) d. Encourage housing around and in commercial centers (Circulation Element, Objective 3.2) e. Concentrate growth in the downtown to relieve development pressures on existing residential neighborhoods. (Downtown Specific Plan, Purpose 1.1.10)

SECTION 3. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received, and upon studies and investigation made by the Planning Commission and on its behalf, the Planning Commission further finds and determines that the proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan and is in the best interests of the City and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local law requirements and recommends approval of the development agreement with the following findings:

150 of 2287
101 of 224

a. The development agreement is within the scope of Sustainability Communities Environmental Assessment prepared on behalf of the project and available for public comment for the required 30-day comment period from January 18 to February 17, 2022. b. The development agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan. c. The development agreement will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because it encourages the construction of a project which is desirable and beneficial to the public.
d. The development agreement complies with all applicable City and State regulations governing such agreements.
e. The development agreement is necessary to strengthen the public planning process and to reduce the public and private costs of development uncertainty.

SECTION 4. Based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission resolves the following:

a. Recommend to the City Council the approval of the Development Agreement.

Adopted this 2
nd day of February, 2022.

Moved by Planning Commissioner Shahbazian, and Seconded by Planning Commissioner Fuentes, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the Development Agreement.

VOTE
Ayes: Chraghchian, Fuentes, Minassian, Shahbazian, Lee Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

151 of 2287
102 of 224

EXHIBIT 7
2204 of 2287
103 of 224

2205 of 2287
104 of 224

2206 of 2287
105 of 224

1 7
2 6
5 ORDINANCE NO. _______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GLENDALE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF GLENDALE AND ADELFIA PROPERTIES II, LLC,

A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
WHEREAS, on February 22, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Glendale held a public hearing to consider and recommend the Glendale City Council approve a Development Agreement (“DA”) (attached as Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated herein by this reference) by and between the City of Glendale ("City") and Adelfia Properties II, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("Developer") in connection with development of a 294-unit, 24-story multi-family residential building (“Project”) on the easterly half of the 63,760 SF (1.48 acre) project site zoned Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) Gateway District located at 625 N.

Maryland and 620 N. Brand Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Project includes: 247 1-bedroom units and 47 2- bedroom units; 373 subterranean parking spaces for the residential uses and 129 above-ground, replacement parking spaces for existing commercial bank building; sizeable, publicly accessible open space courtyard/plaza fronting Brand Boulevard; and residential amenity spaces and decks throughout the project; and
WHEREAS, the Project has a FAR of 7.25 and the building height is 266 feet (7.25 FAR and 275 feet maximum by right in the DSP Gateway District), and complies with all of the development standards and no variances are proposed; and WHEREAS, the Project also involves preservation of an existing a six-story commercial bank/office building located on site at 620 N. Brand Boulevard, and demolition a two-level parking garage and adjacent commercial building to the rear of the site along Maryland Avenue (625 N. Maryland Avenue); and
WHEREAS, the City has confirmed that the Developer has an equitable interest in the property on which the Project is to be located; and
106 of 224

2 7
2 6
5 WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the City enter into the DA to preserve the Project entitlements for a six (6) year term, and lock in the current Development Impact Fees (impact and linkage fees, exactions, or fair share charges imposed on new development) for the Project including the Public Use Facilities Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.10); Affordable Housing Development Impact Fee (GMC Section 4.11); and Inclusionary Housing Requirements (GMC Section 30.35.060) so that the Developer has time to finance and construct the Project in light of the continued financial instability resulting from the uneven economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, and so that the Developer has sufficient time to secure construction financing and subsequent preparation of construction documents, plan check and permitting; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq., the City Planning Commission has transmitted its findings, comments, and recommendations on the DA to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the DA and the findings and recommendations of the City Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department, after having conducted an Initial Study, prepared a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) for the Project, under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21155 et seq., which SCEA, including public comments and responses to comments, (Exhibit 7) was presented to City Council for consideration and approval prior to Project approval on June 14, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on June 14, 2022, following a public hearing on the Project and found Project would not cause any significant non-mitigable environmental impacts and based thereon approved the SCEA and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project; and
WHEREAS, after considering the Development Agreement, the City finds and determines that the Development Agreement is in the vital and best interests of the City and the health, 107 of 224

3 safety, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable state and local law.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

1. The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:
(a) The City has complied with the applicable requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
(b) The Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan, with the Downtown Specific Plan.
(c) The Development Agreement fully complies with all currently applicable provisions of the Glendale Municipal Code.
(d) The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare because it encourages the development of much-needed housing in a location that is recognized by state law as a transit priority project that qualifies for a stream-lined environmental assessment under CEQA because the location of the project will reduce impacts on air quality and greenhouse gas emissions compared to developments not so situated. (e) The Development Agreement is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area and will provide enhancements to the surrounding area and public benefit, including housing.
(f) The Development Agreement constitutes a lawful present exercise of the City's police power and complies with all applicable City and State regulations governing Development Agreements.
(g) The Development Agreement is necessary to strengthen the public planning process and to reduce the public and private costs of development uncertainty.

2. Based on all the findings contained herein, the City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute it on behalf of 108 of 224

4 the City of Glendale, and further directs the City Clerk to record the Development Agreement and this Ordinance with the County Recorder within ten (10) days of its execution.

3. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the Glendale Independent or other local newspaper of general circulation, consistent with requirements of applicable State and local law.

4. This Ordinance shall be effective 30 days after the date of adoption.

Adopted this ______ day of ______________________, 2023. ________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk
109 of 224

5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, DR. SUZIE ABAJIAN, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the __________ day of ________________, 2023, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
__________________________________
City Clerk
110 of 224

6 EXHIBIT “A”

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
111 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing Execution of a Lease Agreement between the City of Glendale and Babak B. Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 for a 3-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2026.

1. Introduction of Ordinance authorizing execution of a three year lease agreement between the City of Glendale and Babak B. Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) facility.

2. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding the lease.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Ordinance Introduction
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) has been operating workforce services of the Community Services & Parks (CSP) department from its location at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 since 1999.

The existing ten-year lease and addendums for the VJC facility will expire on March 31, 2023. The new three-year lease agreement will be a monthly flat rate of $58,135.00 beginning April 1, 2023, up to and through March 31, 2026. Glendale Charter Article VI, Section 15, requires the council to adopt an ordinance for the lease of property longer than five years than a period of longer than five (5) years, except by ordinance. The cumulative amount of time the City will have leased this property exceeds five (5) years, accordingly this staff report offers an ordinance for introduction authorizing execution of the proposed lease.
112 of 224

28a
4 0
5 8
City owned SR zoned property or property dedicated as park land which property is either an individual parcel of five (5) acres or more, or parcels which are adjoining and collectively equal or exceed five (5) or more acres shall not be sold or transferred except upon approval of a majority of the voters at an election held for such purpose.

During the Verdugo Workforce Development Board (VWDB) – Special Executive Committee meeting on March 8, 2023, the VWDB provided its approval to use Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) funds to pay for the monthly rent amount at VJC.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A

RECOMMENDATION
(1) Introduce the Ordinance Authorizing execution of a three year Lease Agreement between the City of Glendale and Babak B. Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 for a 3-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2026; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding the lease.

BACKGROUND
The Verdugo Consortium is a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) compromised of the cities of Glendale, Burbank, and La Cañada-Flintridge. The Consortium’s purpose is to provide workforce programs within the three cities. Through the JPA, the City of Glendale is responsible for the administration of all Consortium activities, including executing all contracts on behalf of the Consortium. These contracts include the lease agreement for the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) where the City has been the lease holder since 1999.

The VJC has been operating workforce services from its location at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204. This site is a 2-story, 23,254 square foot facility with office space, meeting/conference rooms and ample parking spaces that fulfills the program needs of the workforce section. The VJC consists of employment counseling, job search, job listings, self-service, workshops, business outreach, customized recruitment, and job training programs.

ANALYSIS
The current lease, first addendum, and the second addendum to the lease (collectively, the “Lease”) for the VJC facility expires on March 31, 2023. After this period, the Lease terms will be in effect and City will be on a month-to-month basis. 113 of 224

38a
4 0
5 8
The lease negotiation has been a steady process since last year with the assistance of Overland, Pacific & Cutler, LLC (OPC), a real estate service company previously procured through the City of Glendale’s Community Development Department. Under the guidance of OPC and the assistance of City Attorney’s office, the terms of the lease were finalized and also signed off by the property owner, Mr. Babak B. Golbahar.

Under the new lease agreement, the current lease rate will slightly decrease from $2.53 a square foot to $2.50 a square foot, with this remaining a flat rate through the lease period. This translates to a monthly rent payment of $58,135.00. Currently, the Workforce Section pays for fifty-nine percent (59%) of the monthly rent and the State of California Employment Development Department (EDD) pays the remaining forty-one percent (41%) of the cost. The Workforce Section does not anticipate any changes to EDD’s percentage contribution to the monthly rent in upcoming sublease negotiations which is approximately for 9,451 square footage of 41% of the useable space. The VJC programs are part of an integrated workforce system with EDD. As a result, EDD has been co- located in the center for over twenty years.

Section 9 of the Lease Agreement (please see Exhibit 1) on page 4 outlines the owner’s responsibilities for interior improvement and building systems that include HVAC maintenance, roofing repairs, painting, flooring, and pest control. Staff will work with the owner to ensure ongoing accountability of these items.

Overall, since there are no options for continuing the Lease beyond March 31, 2026, staff will be conducting significant analysis to explore the potential to move to alternate facilities within the City of Glendale after March 31, 2026.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The VJC assists the most vulnerable populations. The VWDB and EDD promote WIOA services to the Verdugo region. With established partnerships with organizations in the region, the VWDB will work collaboratively to promote WIOA services to those with limited access to services and with multiple barriers, so they are connected to WIOA programs offered at the VJC.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Lease Agreement for a 3-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2026 will cost $2,092,860. The cost for the remainder of the three months of the fiscal year will cost $174,405, which was approved as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. The funding for 114 of 224

48a
4 0
5 8
future years will be requested as a part of the annual budget process. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$174,405 GL: 47180-2060-CSP-0020-P0000-
PL: G65013-LEASES-0000-2060
Workforce Fund
The State of California Employment Development Department is co-located in the center, and as a result pays forty-one percent (41%) of the cost. The Workforce Section does not anticipate any changes to their percentage contribution to the monthly rent in upcoming sublease negotiations.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5768, the following are the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for the contract in this Agenda Item Report. Please see Exhibit

3. Ownership Interest in more than 10% in Property at 1255 South Central Avenue:

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Babak B. Golbahar Owner 2020 Cotner Ave Los Angeles CA 90025

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: The City Council may introduce the ordinance authorizing execution of the Lease Agreement between the City of Glendale and Babak B.

Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 for a 3-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2026; and authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding.
115 of 224

58a
4 0
5 8
Alternative 2: The City Council may decide not to introduce the ordinance and authorize the City Manager to execute the Lease Agreement for Verdugo Jobs Center facility.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Judith Velasco, Workforce Development Administrator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Copy of Lease Agreement 3-13-2023
Exhibit 2: VWDB Special Meeting Minutes 3-8-2023
Exhibit 3: Campaign Disclosure Form
116 of 224

c:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\cc_03212023_ordinance_8a1.pdf 1 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND BABAK B. GOLBAHAR FOR THE VERDUGO
JOBS CENTER (VJC) FACILITY LOCATED AT 1255 SOUTH CENTRAL AVENUE, GLENDALE, CA 91204 FOR A 3-YEAR PERIOD FROM APRIL 1, 2023 TO MARCH 31, 2026.

WHEREAS, the Verdugo Jobs Center (VJC) has been operating workforce services of the Community Services & Parks (CSP) department from its location at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 since 1999; and
WHEREAS, the existing ten-year lease including its addendums for the VJC facility will expire on March 31, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the City and the property owner desire to enter into a new lease for the facility for three (3) years which will be based on a monthly flat rate of $58,135.00 beginning April 1, 2023, up to and through March 31, 2026; and WHEREAS, Glendale Charter Article VI, Section 15, requires the council to adopt an ordinance for the lease of property for a period of longer than five (5) years; WHEREAS, the cumulative amount of time the City has leased this property exceeds five (5) years, accordingly adoption of this ordinance is required by Glendale Charter prior to execution of the proposed lease.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1: The City’s lease of the real property 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, California, from property owner Babak B. Golbahar, as more particularly described in the Lease Agreement attached to City Council staff report, dated March 21, 2023, and by this reference made a part hereof, is hereby approved for a term of three (3) years as set forth in the Lease Agreement.

SECTION 2. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute the Lease Agreement in substantially the form as attached to the March 21, 2023 staff report. 117 of 224

c:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\cc_03212023_ordinance_8a1.pdf 2 SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective within thirty days from the date of its adoption.

Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the day of ____________, 2023.
_______________________________
Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Dr. Suzie Abajian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ______________ was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2023, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
____________________________
City Clerk
118 of 224

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member__________________________, seconded by Council Member____________________________, that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement funding for the three (3) year lease from Babak B. Golbahar of real property located at 1255 South Central Avenue for operation of the Verdugo Jobs Center.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
119 of 224

1 CITY OF GLENDALE, a Municipal Corporation

STANDARD LEASE

PREAMBLE

THIS LEASE is made and entered to this ______ of March, 2023, by and between BABAK B.

GOLBAHAR, an individual, hereinafter referred to as Lessor, without distinction as to number or gender, and the CITY OF GLENDALE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City (the “Lease”).

WITNESSETH

1. Description: The Lessor hereby leases to the City and th e City hereby leases from the Lessor those certain premises with appurtenances situated in the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and more particularly described as follows:

Approximately 23,254 net usable square feet of office space on the first and second floors (“Leased Premises”) of the building located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, California 91204 (“Building”) and including nonexclusive unobstructed parking spaces contiguous to the subject Building, and unlimited use of the Building’s common facilities. The City shall have access to and use of the Leased Premises twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with no exceptions.

2. Term: The term of this Lease shall commence on April 1, 2023, and shall end on Ma rch 31, 2026, with such rights or termination as may be hereinafter expressly set forth.

3. Rent: Rental payments shall be paid by the City, from le gally available funds and subject to the California Constitution, in arrears on the last day of each month during said term as follows:

FIFTY-EIGHT THOUSAND AND ONE-HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($58,135.00) FLAT RATE beginning April 1, 2023, up to and through March 31, 2026.

Rent payable hereunder for any period of time less than one month shall be determined by prorating the monthly rental herein specified based on the actual number of days in the month Rental shall be paid to Lessor at the address specified in Paragraph 4 (Notices) or to such other address as the Lessor may designate by a notice in writing.

4. Notices. All notices and correspondence herein provided to be given, or which may be given by either party to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given when made in writing and either: 1) deposited in the United States Mail, certified and postage prepaid; or 2) sent via an alternate commercial overnight delivery service (i.e., Lease Covering Premises Located at:
1255 S. Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91204
Tenant Agency:

City of Glendale – Verdugo Workforce
Development Board
120 of 224

2 FedEx or similar) with receiver’s signature required; and addressed as follows:

To the Lessor: Babak B. Golbahar
2020 Cotner Avenue
West Los Angeles, CA 90025
Phone No.: (310) 447-2020
FAX No.: (310) 447-0330

To the City: City of Glendale
Director of Community Services and Parks
613 East Broadway, Room 120
Glendale, CA 91206-4996
Phone No.: (818) 548-6422
FAX No.: (818) 548-3724

Nothing herein contained shall preclude the giving of any such written notice by personal service. The address to which notices and correspondence should be mailed to either party may be changed by giving written notice to the other party.

5. ADA, Asbestos/Lead, and Seismic Compliance Work (“Compliance Work”).

A. ADA Work. Lessor agrees that, prior to the conclusion of the fifth (5th) month of this Lease (“Completion Date”), and at Lessor’s sole cost and expense, Lessor agrees to engage and pay an architect to update the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) Survey, and to pay up to TEN-THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000) towards any curative work necessary to bring the Leased Premises into compliance with all ADA requirements (the “ADA Reimbursement”). Following completion of the ADA Su rvey in the event ADA improvements are required to comply with any ADA re quirements, Lessor shall pay City contractor(s), architect(s), and consultant(s) (collectively, the “A gents”) the ADA Reimbursement to cover the cost of any curative work necessary to comply with ADA requirements (the “ADA Work”).

I. The City shall secure any necessary plans and buildi ng permits and approvals prior to start of ADA Work. The City shall cause its architects, its designated planner (the “Project Architect”) to prepare and deliver to City preliminary plans and specifications (the “Preliminary Plans”), in accordance with the Scope of Work for a Professional Services Agr eement City may enter in to with the Project Architect for such ADA Work.

II. The City shall after receipt of the Preliminary Pl ans, either approve the same or notify the project Architect and Lessor in writing of how the Preliminary Plans are inconsistent with the Scope of Work, and whether and how the Preliminary Plans are to be changed in order to make them consistent with the Scope of Work.

III. The City shall then cause the Project Architect to prepare the Final Plans which shall be submitted to and be subject to approval of the City and the Lessor, it being agreed that the Lessor’s approval shall be deemed given unless the Final Plans are materially inconsistent from the Scope of Work. Lessor’s approval of the Final Plans shall not be an evaluation of the quality of Project Architect’s designs or methods, the quality, fitness, safety, or soundness of the improvements constructed on the basis of such plans or the compliance of such plans with any applicable requirements of law. At such time as the City and Lessor have approved the Final Plans, the City and Lessor shell select a contractor mutually approved by them based on the lowest bi d after competitively bidding such work from at least three (3) qualified contractors.

B. Seismic Work. Lessor acknowledges and agrees that a mate rial inducement to the City to enter into this Lease is the agreement of the Lessor to perform any re quired remedial work to the Building in order that the Building shall comply with the current State of California seismic code guidelines (“Seismic Work”).

If required, such work shall be performed, at the Lessor’s sole cost and expense, and Lessor shall endeavor 121 of 224

3 to complete such work in a comm ercially reasonable time and such wo rk shall be anticipated to be completed not later than the Completion Date, as previously defined. In the event Seismic Work is not be completed by the Completion Date, and, if the City h as not waived its requirement of Lessor to perform such work, then, in that event, the City shall have the right to have such work performed and shall have the right to retain a contractor to perform such work. Upon completion of such work, the City shall have provided the Lessor with paid invoice(s) and lien release(s) and, only after providing the Lessor such information, the City shall offset the Rent next due by the same amount the City had paid for such work.

If no such Seismic Work is required, then Lessor shall provide a letter certifying that no structural work has occurred on the Leased Premises since 2012.

C. Asbestos Abatement. Lessor hereby warrants and guar antees that the space leased to the City will be operated and maintained free of hazard from Asbestos Containing Materials (“ACM”) and agrees to the conditions for survey, testing, and abatement or ACM as applicable. Lessor specifically agrees that, in the event the City elects to exercise its rights under the provisions of Paragraph 14 (Destruction) of this Lease, any costs related to abatement or hazard from asbestos shall be the Lessor's responsibility (the “Asbestos Work”). Lessor acknowledges and agrees that a materia l inducement to the City to enter into this Lease is the agreement of the Lessor to perform any required wo rk in and about the Building, at the Lessor’s sole cost and expense, in order that the Building sh all comply with the Cal/OSHA guidelines for asbestos containing materials and the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (“SCAQMD”) Rule 1403 (collectively, the “Guidelines and Requirements”). If such work is required to be performed, then Lessor shall endeavor to complete such work in a commercially reasonable time and such work shall be anticipated to be completed not late r than the Completion Date as previously defined in Paragraph 3 (Rent) above. In the event such work is not completed by the Completion Date, and, if the City has not waived its requirement of Lessor to perform such work, then , in that event, the City shall have the right to have such work performed and shall have the right to retain a contractor to perform such work.

Upon completion of the Asbestos Work, the City shall have prov ided the Lessor with paid in voice(s) and lien release(s) and, only after providing the Lessor such information, the City shall offset the Rent next due by the same amount the City had paid for such work . The City acknowledges th at Lessor shall retain an expert qualified to assess whether the Leased Premises contains any asbestos or lead.

D. Invoicing. The City shall have reviewed and approved a ny invoice(s) for any ADA Work, Seismic Work and or Asbestos Work performed before the c ontractor submits the invoice(s) to the Lessor for payment.

The City consultants or agents shall provide Lessor the appropriate and applicable lien release(s) for any such work performed and Lessor shall pay such invoice(s) within thirty (30) days of such submittal to Lessor for payment. Lessor shall regularly (and not less than once each calendar month) advise the City of the aggregate invoice amounts and the balance of the Allowance amount still remaining for the Work as defined. Any portion of the Allowance not utilized during the term of this Lease shall no longer be available and Lessor shall not be required to make any further reimbursements. It is understood and agreed that the City is in occupancy within the Leased Premises under an existing lease at the time such ADA Work is implemented.

6. Notice of Completion and Access lo Leased Premises during Construction.

Lessor shall notify the City in writing of the anticipated Completion Date of any modifications to the Leased Premises required to be performed by Lessor by Paragraph 5 (Compliance Work) herein above, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the anticipated completion of such modifications. Lessor and the City agree and acknowledge that such potential work to be performed by Lessor within the Leased Premises is a material inducement to the City for entering into the Standard Lease Form. In the event such work is not completed prior to the Completion Date, then the Monthly Rental shall be abated until such date that the work is completed.

The City or its contractors or other representatives shall have the right to modify the Leased Premises for the purpose of installing and maintaining certain equipment such as, but not limited to, modular system furniture, and 122 of 224

4 electrical and telecommunications cabling and equipment, and the City shall provide Lessor prior written notice when such work shall be performed. Lessor and City shall each make all reasonable efforts to ensure that the respective construction and installation work is scheduled in such a manner so as not to interfere with or delay the other.

7. Parking.

Lessor, at Lessor’s sole cost and expense, shall clearly mark the parking spaces within the adjacent parking lot that are all assigned to the City. Said parking spaces will be arranged and maintained so as to provide unobstructed access to each parking space at any lime. City shall have the right to utilize the parking spaces adjacent to the Building free of charge throughout the Term.

8. Services, Utilities, and Supplies.

Lessor, at Lessor’s sole cost and expense, during the term of this lease shall furnish the following services and supplies to the Leased Premises and also to the “common” building areas, if any, such as lobbies, elevators, stairways, corridors, etc., which City may share with other tenants, if any:

A. Sewer, trash disposal, and water service, including both hot and cold water in the lavatories.

B. Elevator service.

8.1 The City hereby agrees to secure and pay for the servi ces referenced below and to sweep and maintain the property outside the Building free from debris:

A. Electricity and/or gas as necessary to provide power for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning, and electrical or gas service as needed for City’s operations.

B. Janitorial services sufficient to maintain the Interior in a clean well-maintained condition; that is, to eliminate all visible dust, dirt, litter, grime, stains, smears, finger marks, etc., to the greatest practical degree possible.

C. Landscaping service about the Building and security alarm service for the Leased Premises.

In the event of failure by the Lessor to furnish any of the services or supplies to be provided by Lessor in a satisfactory manner, the City may furnish the same at its own cost; and, in addition to any other rights or remedies the City may have In law or equity, may deduct the am ount thereof (including City’s administrative costs) from the rent that may then be, or thereafter become due hereunder.

9. Repair and Maintenance.

During the Lease term, the Lessor shall maintain the Leased Premises in good repair and tenantable condition, so as to minimize breakdowns and loss of the City’s use of the Leased Premises caused by deferred or inadequate maintenance, including, but not limited to:

1. Generally maintaining the Leased Premises in good, vermin-free, operating condition and appearance.

2. Furnishing prompt, good quality repair of the Building, equipment, and appurtenances.

3. Furnishing preventative maintenance, including , but not limited to, manufacturer’s recommended servicing of equipment such as elevator, heating, ventilating and air conditioning (“HVAC”) system, equipment, and fixtures.

4. Furnishing ongoing maintenance and prompt repair or any and all equipment and systems servicing the Building, including but not limited to, security and access control systems, fire suppression systems, special HVAC systems for computer rooms, and Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems.
123 of 224

5 5. Furnishing and promptly replacing any inoperative light bulbs , fluorescent tubes, ballast, starters, and fillers for the heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment as required.

6. Furnishing remedial painting as necessary to main tain the Leased Premises in a neat, clean, and orderly condition.

7. Annual testing and maintenance of all fire extinguishers in or adjacent to the Leased Premises.

8. Repairing and replacing parking lot bumpers and paving as necessary. Repaint directional arrows, striping, etc., as necessary.

9. Repairing and replacing floor covering as necessary. Lessor, at Lessor’s sole cost, shall arrange for moving of furniture and equipmen t prior and subsequent to repa iring or replacement of floor covering.

10. Keeping all walkways, parking lots, entrances, and auxiliary areas free of snow, water, oil spills, debris, or other materials which may be hazardous to users of the Building.

B. Lessor shall provide prompt repair or correction for any damage except damage arising from a willful or negligent act of the City's agents, employees, or invitees.

C. Except in emergency situations, the Lessor shall not give less than 48-hour prior notice to City tenants, when any pest control, remodeling, renovation, or repair work affecting the City occupied space may result in employee health concerns in the work environment.

D. In case Lessor, after notice in writing from the City requiring the Lessor to comply with the requirements of this paragraph in regard to a specified condition, shall fail, refuse or neglect to comply with such notice, or in the event of an emergency constituting a hazard to the health or safety of the City employees, property, or invitees, the City may at its option, perform such maintenance or make such repair at its own cost and, in addition to any other remedy the C ity may have, may withhold rent due and deduct the amount thereof, inc luding necessary costs incurred by the City required for the administration of such maintenance and repairs, from the rent that may then be or thereafter become due hereunder.

10. Alterations.

The City shall have the right during the existence of this Lease to make alterations; attach fixtures; and erect additions, structures, or signs in or upon the Leased Premises (collectively, the “Alterations”) , all at the City’s sole cost and expense. Such fixtures, additions, structures, or signs so placed in or upon or attached to the Leased Premises under this Lease or any extension hereof shall be and remain the property of the City and may be removed there from by the City prior to the termination or expiration of this Lease or any renewal or extension hereof; provided that the City shall repair any damage to the Building caused by such removal as provided in paragraph 21 (Surrender of Possession).

11. Assignment and Subletting.

The City shall not assign or sublease any portion of the Leased Premises without prior written consent of the Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. However, the City shall, in any event have the right to sublet the Leased Premises as further set forth in paragraph 28 (Sublessee) herein below.

12. Quiet Possession.

The Lessor agrees that the City, while keeping and performing the covenants herein contained, shall at all times during the existence of this Lease, peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the Leased Premises without suit, trouble, or hindrance from the Lessor or any person claiming under Lessor.

13. Inspection.

The Lessor reserves the right to enter and inspect the Leased Premises at reas onable times, and to render services 124 of 224

6 and make any necessary repairs to the Leased Premises. Lessor shall give the City at least 48 hours’ notice of any intention to enter the Leased Premises except in the case of emergency.

14. Destruction.

If the Leased Premises are totally destroyed by fire or other casualty, this Lease shall terminate. If such casualty shall render ten percent (10%) or less of the floor space of the Leased Premises unusable for the purpose intended, Lessor shall effect restoration of the Leased Premises as quickly as is reasonably possible, but in any event within thirty (30) days.

In the event such casualty shall render more than ten percent (10%) of such floor space unusable but shall not constitute total destruction, Lessor shall forthwith give notice to City of the specific number of days required to repair the same. If Lessor under such circumstances shall not give such notice within fifteen (15) calendar days after such destruction, or if such notice shall specify that such repairs will require more than ninety (90) days to complete from date such notice is given, City, in either such event, at its option may terminate this Lease or, upon notice to Lessor, may maintain occupancy and elect to undertake the repairs itself, deducting the cost thereof from the rental due or to become due under this Lease and any other lease between Lessor and City.

In the event of any such destruction other than the total destruction where the City has not terminated the Lease as herein provided, or pursuant to the terms hereof has not elected to make the repairs itself, Lessor shall diligently prosecute the repair of said Leased Premises and, in any event, if said repairs are not completed within the period of thirty (30) days for destruction a ggregating ten percent (10%) or less of the floor space, or within the period specified in Lessor’s notice in connection with partial d estruction aggregating more than ten percent (10%), the City shall have the option to terminate this Lease or co mplete the repairs itself, deducting the cost thereof from the rental due or to become due under this Lease and any other lease between Lessor and City.

In the event the City remains in possession of the Leased Premises though partially damaged, the rental as herein provided shall be reduced by the same ratio as the net square feet the City is thus precluded from occupying bears to the total net square feet in the Leased Premises. “Net square feet” shall mean actual inside dimensions and shall not include public corridors, stairwells, elevators, and restrooms.

It is understood and agreed that the City or its agent h as the right to enter its destroyed or partially destroyed leased facilities no matter what the condition. At the City ’s request, the Lessor shall immediately identify an appropriate route through the Building to access the City leased space. If the Lessor cannot identify an appropriate access route, it is agreed that the City may use any and a ll means of access at its discretion in order to enter its leased space.

15. Subrogation Waived.

To the extent authorized by any fire and extended coverage insurance policy issued to Lessor on the herein Leased Premises, Lessor hereby waives the subrogation rights of the insurer, and releases the City from liability for any loss or damage covered by said insurance.

16. Prevailing Wage Provision.

For those projects defined as “public works” pursuant to Labor Code §1720.2, the following shall apply:

A. Lessor/contractor shall comply with prevailing wage requirements and be subject to restrictions and penalties in accordance with §1770 et seq. of the Labor Code which requires prevailing wages be paid to appropriate work classifications in all bid specifications and subcontracts.

125 of 224

7 17. Fair Employment Practices.

During the performance of this Lease, th e Lessor shall not deny benefits to any person on the basis of religion, color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, physical or mental disability, nor shall th ey discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, mar ital status, age, or sex. Lessor shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination.

18. DVBE Participation.

The City supports the use of Disabled Veterans Busi ness Enterprise (DVBE) and California Certified Small Business (SB) and Lessor is encouraged but not required to utilize DVBE and Certifie d SB to fulfill its lease obligation under this Lease.

19. Service Companies.

Lessor shall provide the City with the name, address, and telephone number of an ag ency or person as a local source of service regarding the Lessor’s responsibilities under this Lease as to repairs, maintenance, and servicing of the Leased Premises and any or all related equipment, fixtures, and appurtenances.

20. Holding Over.

In the event the City remains in po ssession of the Leased Premises after the expiration of the Lease term, or any extension or renewal thereof, this Lease shall be auto matically extended on a month-to-month basis, subject to thirty (30) days termination by either party, and otherwise on the terms and conditions herein specified, so far as applicable, if the last rental amount shown in Paragraph 3 (Rent). If the City fails to vacate the Leased Premises within the notice period and remains for an extended period, additional rent shall be paid and prorated on a thirty (30) day month, based on the actual number of days the City occupies the Leased Premises following the effective date of termination.

21. Surrender of Possession.

Upon termination or expiration of this Lease, the City will peacefully surrender to the Lessor the Leased Premises in as good order and condition when received, except for reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, the elements, acts of God, pandemics, or circumstances over which City has no control or for which Lessor is responsible pursuant to this Lease. The City shall have no duty to remove any improvements or fixtures placed by it on the Leased Premises or to restore any portion of the Leased Premises altered by it, save and except in the event City elects to remove any such improvements or fixtures and such removal causes damages or injury to the Leased Premises, and then only to the extent of any such damage or injury.

22. Time Is of the Essence.

Time is of the essence of this Lease, and the terms and provisions of this Lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns to the respective parties hereto. All of the parties hereto shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder.

23. No Oral Agreements.

It is mutually understood and agreed that no alterations or variations of the terms of this Lease shall be valid 126 of 224

8 unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and that no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto.

24. Service Contracts, Wages and Benefits.

All janitorial and housekeeping services, custodians, window cleaners and security guards provided by Lessor pursuant to the provisions of this Lease, shall be in full compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 19134, if applicable.

25. Attorneys’ Fees.

If any litigation is commenced between the parties to this Lease concerning the Leased Premises, this Lease, or the rights and duties of either in relation to the Leased Premises or this Lease, the party prevailing in that litigation shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief granted, to a reasonable sum as and for its attorneys’ fees in the litigation, which shall be determined by the court in that litigation or in a separate action brought for that purpose.

26. Default/Payment.

Should City at any time be in defau lt with respect to any payment of Rent or any other charge payable by Cit y pursuant to this Lease for a period of five (5) business days afte r written notice from Lessor to City (provided, however, any notice shall be in lieu of, and not in addition to, any notice required under California Law or any similar, superseding statute), or should City be in defa ult in the prompt and full performance of any other of its promises, covenants or agreements herein contained for more than a reasonable time (in no event to exceed thirty 30 days) after written notice thereof from Lessor to City specifying the particulars of the default (provided, however, any notice shall be in lieu of, and not in addition to, any notice required un der California law or any similar, superseding statute), or should City vacate or abandon the Premises, and fail to pay Rent, or should City institute any proceedings under the Bankruptcy Code or any similar or successor statute, code or act, then Lessor may treat the occurrence of any one (1) or more of the foregoing events as a breach of this Lease (“Default”) and, in addition to any or all other rights or remedies of Lessor by law pr ovided, Lessor shall have the right, at Lessor’s option, without further notice or demand of any kind to City or a ny other person, (a) to declare the Term ended and to re- enter and take possession of the Premises and remove all pe rsons therefrom, or (b) without declaring this Lease terminated and without terminating City’s right to possession, to re-enter the Premises and occupy the whole or any part for and on account of City and to collect any unpaid rentals and other charges which have become payable or which may thereafter become payable, or (c) even thoug h it may have re-entered th e Premises as provided in subparagraph (b) above, to thereafter elect to terminate this Lease and all of the rights of City in or to the Premises.

In any case in which Lessor shall re-enter and occupy the whole or any part of the Premises, by unlawful detainer proceedings or otherwise, Lessor, at its option, may repair, alter, subdivide or change the character of the Premises from time to time in such manner as Lessor deems best, may re let the Premises or any part thereof and receive the rents therefor, and none of such actions shall constitute a termination of this Lease, a release of City from any liability hereunder, or result in the release or exoneration of any guarantor.

27. Inducement Recapture.

Any agreement for free or abated rent or other charges, or for the giving or paying by Lessor to or for City of any cash or other bonus, inducement or consideration for City’s entering into this Lease, all of which concessions are hereinafter referred to as “Inducement Provisions”, sha ll be deemed conditioned upo n City’s full and faithful performance of all of the terms, covenants, and conditi ons of this Lease. Upon breach of this Lease by City, any such Inducement Provision shall automatically be deemed deleted from this Lease and of no further force or effect, and any rent, other charge, bonus, inducement, or consideration heretofore abated, given, or paid by Lessor under such an Inducement Provision shall be immediately due and payabl e by City to Lessor, notwithstanding any 127 of 224

9 subsequent cure of said breach by City. No waiver by City or Lessor or any provision herein shall be deemed a waiver or any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by either party of the same or any other provision.

City’s or Lessor’s consent to or approval of any act shall not be deemed to render unnecessary the obtaining of City’s or Lessor’s consent to or approval or any subsequent act.

28. Sublessee.

In accordance with paragraph 11 (Assignm ent and Subletting) of this Lease, th e City anticipates that it shall be subleasing a portion of the Leased Premises to the Stat e of California’s Employment Development Department (“State”). The State is anticipated to sublease approximately 9,451 square feet of the Leased Premises and that the State shall occupy the Leased Premises in common with the City and Lessor acknowledges and agrees to same.

In the event the City has not executed a sublease with the State, the City shall have the right to terminate the Lease (“Termination Right”) upon not less than thirty (30) days’ prior written no tice to Lessor (“Termination Notice”).

The City’s exercise of its Termination Right shall be effective if the Termination Notice is delivered to Lessor by no later than sixty (60) days from the commencement date of this Lease; time being of the essence. If City effectively exercises its Termination Right, City shall remain li able for all amounts payable under the Lease through the effective date of termination.

Within 30 days of delivery of the Termination Notice, the City shall pay a termination fee equal to two (2) months of Rent next due (“Termination Fee”). Failure of the C ity to pay the Termination Fee when due shall render the City’s Termination Right null and void and the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

29. Building Systems.

Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining the HVAC system in good working order and repair and shall regularly clean the HVAC ducting in a commercially reasonable manner at least once a year during the Lease term.

The City shall have the right to perform regular clean ing and maintenance work in the event Lessor has not performed regularly or does not regularly perform such work to the HVAC and its ducting system but only after the City notifies the Lessor in writing of the City’s intent to perform such work. Lessor sh all advise the City, within three (3) business days of the City’s notice, as to whether the Lessor shall be performing such work within not less than fourteen (14) days from the City’s notice.

In the event Lessor does not pe rform the work, or, advises that City that the Lessor shall not be doing so, then, in that event, the City may contract for such cleaning and maintenance to be performed. The City shall deduct such costs, paid to a contractor(s) by the City for such work, from the Rent next due after providing the Lessor its paid invoice(s) and any lien release(s) for such work.

30. Lessor Payments.

In the event Lessor does not make any payment(s) to any of the City’s contractor(s), service provider(s) or agent(s) when due then the City shall have the right to make such payment(s) but only in the event it previously advises the Lessor of the City’s intent to make su ch payment(s) on the Lessor’s behalf. L essor shall have thirty (30) days to make such payment(s) and, in the event Lessor has not made such payment(s) within sixty (60) days of when due, the City shall have the right to do so. Should the City make any payment to any cont ractor(s), service provider(s) or agent(s) that provides the City with the documenta tion of the Lessor’s responsibility to have made such payment(s) then, in that event, the City shall deduct any payment(s) it may make from the Rent next due.

31. Insurance.

Lessor shall, from the Term commencement date hereof un til the expiration of the Lease, and any extension(s) thereof, maintain in effect the following insurance:
128 of 224

10 Physical damage insurance insuring the Building from loss or damage due to fire and other casualties covered within the classification of “all risk” or “special form” coverage , vandalism coverage and malic ious mischief, sprinkler leakage, water damage and special extended coverage on the Building.

Commercial general liability insurance in the amount of at least five million dollars ($5,000,000.00) against claims of bodily injury, personal injury or property damage arising out of Lessor’s operations, assumed liabilities, contractual liabilities, or use of the Building, common areas and the Building adjacent parking facility.

The City shall neither use the Leased Premises nor permit the Leased Premises to be used, or acts to be done therein, which will: (a) increase the premium of any insurance on the Building, (b) cause a cancellation of or be in conflict with any such insurance policy, or (c) subject Lessor to any liability or responsibility fo r injury to any person or property by reason of any operation being conducted in the Leased Premises.

City shall, from the Term commencement date hereof until the expiration of the Lease, and any extension(s) thereof, maintain in effect the following insurance:

Commercial general liability insurance in the amount of at least five million dollars ($5,000,000.00) against claims of bodily injury, personal injury or property damage arising out of City’s operations, assumed liabilities, contractual liabilities, or use of the Building, common areas and the Building adjacent parking facility.

City shall have the right to self-insure for the insurance requi red above, provided : City has in place as of commencement date a program of self-i nsurance, whereby the City will be acting as though it were the insurance company providing the insurance required under the provisi ons hereof and the City sh all pay any amounts due in lieu of insurance proceeds because of se lf-insurance, which amounts shall be tr eated as insurance proceeds for all purposes under this Lease.

32. Indemnity.

City agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from and against any claims, damages, injury, or other harm suffered by reason of the negligence or other wrongful act of City or any of City’s agents, contractors, or other representatives arising out of the work that may be performed by the City or its contractor or other representatives.

Lessor agrees to indemnify and hold City and its agents, contractors, or other representatives harmless from and against any claims, damages, injury, or other harm suffe red by reason of the negligence or other wrongful act of Lessor or any of Lessor’s agents, contractors, or other representatives.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Lease has been executed by the parties hereto as of the date first written above.

CITY OF GLENDALE BABAK B. GOLBAHAR
a Municipal Corporation of the State of California an Individual

By: _______________________________ By: ______________________________

Date: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

MICHAEL J. GARCIA, CITY ATTORNEY

By: ______________________________

129 of 224

VERDUGO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD

SPECIAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
3/8/2023
8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.

VWDB Executive Committee Minutes 3/8/2023 Page 1 of 1

MEMBERS PRESENT: Ara Aslanian, Marisol Espinoza, Nick Hacopian MEMBERS ABSENT: Alexis Carter, Teresa Sanchez
STAFF PRESENT: Diana Montecino, MaryAnn Pranke, Judith Velasco, Melissa Younesian
CALL TO ORDER: 8:30 am by Executive Director Judith Velasco via WebEx

I. Introductions
A. Executive Director Judith Velasco thanked the Executive Committee for attending the special meeting.

II. Minutes of February 15, 2023 – deferred to next meeting

III. Action Items

A. Approval to use Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) funds for rental payments as specified in the lease agreement between the City of Glendale and the property owner, Babak B. Golbahar for the Verdugo Jobs Center facility located at 1255 South Central Avenue, Glendale, CA 91204 for a 3-year period, April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2026

1. The lease agreement is for a three-year period at a flat rate of 2.50 per square foot, representing a slight decrease from previous lease agreement.

2. The approval of the lease agreement will allow the VWDB to enter into a sublease agreement with the State of California Employment Development Department.

3. Discussion: The Executive Committee agreed that the terms of the lease agreement were favorable.

IV. Other Businesses and Announcements:

A. Ms. Velasco invited the Executive Committee to attend the upcoming Glendale Chamber of Commerce’s Awards and State of the City 2023 Luncheon that will be held on Thursday, March 23. The VWDB will be purchasing a table for board members to attend.

V. Public Comments: None

VI. Adjournment: 8:40 am
MOTION FOR CONSENT ITEMS A: Motion: Nick Hacopian 2nd: Marisol Espinoza

APPROVED
130 of 224

131 of 224

132 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 8000616 with ARB, Inc. for Ongoing Grayson Site Mechanical and Field Service Support.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Glendale Water & Power (GWP) is seeking approval to amend the current contract with ARB, Inc. to increase the overall not-to-exceed amount of the contract by $180,000.

The current not-to-exceed amount of the contract is $1,050,000. With Council’s approval of Amendment No. 2, the new not-to-exceed amount will be $1,230,000. The increase is for emergency service work provided by ARB, Inc., to clean the Unit No.4 Boiler Waterwall Tube in an expedited amount of time in preparation for the summer peak demand, which almost exhausted the two-year term budgeted amount.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to Contract with ARB, Inc. which increases the not-to-exceed by $180,000 for a new contract total of $1,230,000.
133 of 224

28d
3 9
3 1

BACKGROUND
On July 9, 2019, following a competitive bid process, for which the Notice of Inviting Bids was advertised in the local paper and on EBidboard as well as directly sent to seven firms, only one bid was received from ARB, Inc. ARB, Inc. is a business unit of the conglomerate Primoris and focuses primarily on industrial plants and facilities which includes power generators. The City Council awarded ARB, Inc. a three-year contract, in the amount of $800,000, to furnish labor, equipment and materials for specialized mechanical and field services for the Grayson Power Plant and Scholl Canyon Landfill Gas Plant per Specification No. 3804.

On April 19, 2022, the Amendment No. 1 to the contract with ARB, Inc. was approved by City Council to increase the not-to-exceed amount by an additional $250,000 and extend the term by two years, with the current term of the contract expiring on September 10, 2024.

ANALYSIS
In preparation for the summer peak load, Unit No. 4 had been brought online in late June only to be immediately shut down due to tube failure. After conclusion of repairs in early July, Unit No. 4 was again brought back online and had to be shut down once again after two weeks of generation due to tube failure. After thorough inspection of the sections of the failed boiler tubes, signs of internal debris/slag were apparent which caused the boiler tubes to be blocked and fail at the weakest point. With the knowledge of the summer peak coming and loss of Unit No. 8A generating unit, due to a grounding issue, GWP staff determined that Unit No. 4 was essential to be available to maintain grid stability and recommended to perform a complete waterwall boiler tube cleaning on an emergency basis. On July 27, 2022, with the approval of both the GWP General Manager and the City Manager, the emergency repair work was commenced.

It was anticipated that the emergency repair would be completed on September 9, 2022. However, with the forecast of record-breaking heatwave and to avoid rolling blackout from August 31 to September 9, 2022, ARB, Inc. and GWP staff pushed through to complete the work and made the Unit No. 4 available a week ahead of schedule on September 2nd. Unit No. 4 provided much needed system support throughout the extreme heat event. In addition, Glendale was able to respond to the California Energy Commission’s emergency call for additional supply by exporting excess generation to the California ISO.

The contract with ARB, Inc. will expire on September 10, 2024. The contract is utilized for maintenance and/or repair work as needed at the Grayson Power Plant. With the expenditure of $180,000 on the emergency work to Unit No. 4, the contract requires replenishment for GWP to be able to utilize ARB Inc.’s service during the remaining contract term. Based on the foregoing, staff is respectfully requesting that the City Council authorize Amendment No. 2 to the contract with ARB, Inc. to replenish the $180,000 spent for the emergency work. Amendment No. 2 will increase the total not- to-exceed amount of the contract to $1,230,000.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.
134 of 224

38d
3 9
3 1

FISCAL IMPACT
The repairs will cost $180,000, which was approved as part of the Fiscal Year 22-23 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. Appropriations for future years will be requested through the annual budgetary process. The approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$180,000 GL:43110-5820-GWP-4690-P0000 Electric Works Revenue Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The emergency work described herein is Categorically Exempt under the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 19, Section 15301 which exempts “the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.”

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda item report are attached in Exhibit A, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.
135 of 224

48d
3 9
3 1

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Contract with ARB, Inc..

Alternative 2: Do not to authorize Amendment No. 2 as recommended herein, which may mean possible delay in maintenance and/or repair work at the Grayson Power Plant and may result in unit unavailability during the peak energy demand period.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Scott Mellon, Assistant General Manager - Power Management Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A: Campaign Disclosure Form for ARB, Inc.
136 of 224

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to enter into an amendment (Amendment No. 2) to the existing Agreement with ARB, Inc., (Contract No. 8000616) with the City of Glendale to replenish the Agreement by adding the sum of $180,000 for emergency work performed by ARB, Inc. in the summer of 2022 relating to Grayson Power Plant Unit No. 4 as described in the Report dated March 21, 2023 by the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power Department, increasing the contract amount to a new not-to-exceed amount of $1,230,000. The City Manager, or her designee, is authorized to execute said amendment, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
137 of 224

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
7KH&LW\&RXQFLODGRSWHG2UGLQDQFH1R³&DPSDLJQ)LQDQFH2UGLQDQFH´ZKLFKEHFDPHHIIHFWLYHRQ6HSWHPEHU DQGDPHQGHGLWZLWK2UGLQDQFH1R
ZKLFKEHFDPHHIIHFWLYHRQ0DUFK
³WKH2UGLQDQFH´
7KH2UGLQDQFHSURKLELWV

$FRQWUDFWRU

LQFOXGLQJDVXEFRQWUDFWRU

ʊZKRKDVDFRQWUDFWZLWKWKH&LW\
RI*OHQGDOH
³&LW\´
(FRQRPLF'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW
³(''´
RUWKH+RXVLQJ$XWKRULW\RIWKH&LW\RI*OHQGDOH
³+$´
DQGWKDWFRQWUDFWLVVXEMHFWWRDSSURYDOE\WKH&LW\
&RXQFLO(''RU+$ʊIURPPDNLQJDFRQWULEXWLRQWRD&LW\&RXQFLOPHPEHU(''PHPEHU+$PHPEHU&LW\&OHUNRU&LW\7UHDVXUHU DQG

&RXQFLOPHPEHUV(''
PHPEHUVDQG+$PHPEHUVIURPYRWLQJRQPDWWHUVFRQFHUQLQJDFRQWUDFWZLWKDSHUVRQZKRKDVSURYLGHGDFDPSDLJQFRQWULEXWLRQ 7KH2UGLQDQFHDSSOLHVWRDFRQWUDFWRUZKRVHFRQWUDFWUHTXLUHVWKH&LW\&RXQFLO¶V('' VRU+$¶VDSSURYDO$FRQWUDFWZLWKWKH&LW\(''RU+$LVNQRZQDVD³&LW\ &RQWUDFW´7KH2UGLQDQFHDOVRDSSOLHVWRDVXEFRQWUDFWRUZKRKDVDVXEFRQWUDFWWKURXJKD&LW\&RQWUDFW7KH2UGLQDQFHH[FOXGHVDFRPSHWLWLYHO\ELGFRQWUDFWDZDUGHGWR WKHORZHVWUHVSRQVLEOHELGGHU
7RDVVLVWPHPEHUVRIWKH&LW\&RXQFLO(''DQG+$EHIRUHWKH\YRWHRQDPDWWHUUHJDUGLQJD&LW\&RQWUDFWWKH2UGLQDQFHUHTXLUHV&LW\VWDIIWRSUHSDUHWKLVUHSRUWZKLFK GLVFORVHVFHUWDLQLQIRUPDWLRQDERXW
WKHFRQWUDFWRUUHFHLYLQJWKH&LW\&RQWUDFWDQGWKHVXEFRQWUDFWRU V
ZRUNLQJXQGHUWKH&LW\&RQWUDFW
A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
x The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or x The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
x A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. x A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: Ɣ Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) Ɣ Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
Ɣ Chief Operating Officer
Ɣ Chief Financial Officer
Ɣ Chairperson
Ɣ All members of the Board of Directors
Ɣ All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization Ɣ Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, ('', or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

ARB, Inc. (Primoris Services Corporation (PSC), Parent Company) 26000 Commercentre Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 David L King (PSC) 23000 N. Field Street, Suite 1900 Dallas TX 75201 Tom McCormick (PSC) / Timothy R. Healy (ARB) 23000 N. Field Street, Suite 1900 / 26000 Commercentre Drive Dallas / Lake Forest TX / CA 75201 / 92630 John Moreno (PSC) 23000 N. Field Street, Suite 1900 Dallas TX 75201 David Fehrenbach (ARB) 26000 Commercentre Drive Lake Forest CA 92630 See Attached 23000 N. Field Street, Suite 1900 / 26000 Commercentre Drive Dallas / Lake Forest TX / CA 75201 / 92630

EXHIBIT A
138 of 224

139 of 224

D
D!D
D
D!
D
D

D
!D *9=*6'*:D
D

D
!2*D>7)*:<317*)D'*371D&55D8+D=2*D6*6'*:<D8+D=2*D8&:)D8+D3:*(=8:<D8+DD7(D&D&530:73&D (8:98:&=387D)>5BD0:6*)D&7)D?&53)5BD*A3<=371D>7)*:D=2*D5&@<D8+D=2*D =&=*D8+D&530;3&D=2*D 869&7BD9>:<>&7=D=8D=2*D&>=28:3=BD1:&7=*)D37D=2*DB5&@<D8+D=2*D869&7BD)8D2*:*'BD(87<*7=D =8D=2*D&)89=387D8+D=2*D0558@371D:*<85>=387<D&7)D)8D2*:*'BD&)89=D<>(2D:*<85>=387< D

$D=2&=D=2*D:*<317&=387D8+D (8==D >66*:<D&<D
:*<3)*7=D8+D869&7BD'*D&7)D2*:*'BD3<D
&((*9=*)D*-*(=3?*D *9=*6'*:D
D

D

$D=2&=D=2*D:*<317&=387D8+D;*<=8D!3=8D%&5)8D&<D$3(*D :*<3)*7=D8+D869&7BD'*D&7)D
2*:*'BD3<D&((*9=*)D*-*(=3?*D *9=*6'*:D
D

D
D!D#!D
$D=2&=D=2*D0558@371D37)3?3)>&5<D&:*D=2*D&99:8?*)D<5&=*D8+D8,.(*:<D 8+DD7(D&7)D*&(2D3<D&>=28:3C*)D&7)D2&<D=2*D98@*:D=8D'37)D=2*D869&7BD'BD*7=*:371D37=8D&7BD (87=:&(=D8:D'BD*A*(>=371D&7BD37<=:>6*7=D37D=2*D7&6*D8+D&7)D87D'*2&5+D8+D=2*D869&7BD&7)D<>(2D &>=28:3=BD3<D1*7*:&5D&7)D78=D(87/7*)D=8D<9*(3/(D37<=&7(*<D&7)D<2&55D(87=37>*D>7=35D68)3/*)D'BD :*<85>=387
D
!86D(8:63(4D
D &:5D5):3)1*D $3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
"36D*&5BD
:*<3)*7=D 2:3<D7)*:<87D $3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
827DD
*:3<3(2D $

*(:*=&:BD %&B7*D!:>(2&7D $3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
&?3)D*2:*7'&(2D =*?*D&:7*55D $3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
=*?*D&54(86D &::BD&7<*7D $3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
*:4&7D &56&7D &?3)D$&7D&6D $3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
&:4D8:1*<D

D
:D$3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
:D$3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
:D$3(*D
:*<3)*7=D
!86D(8:63(4D *7D8)1*7D

!36D*&5BD
140 of 224

141 of 224

142 of 224

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION – BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ARB, INC.

P AGE 1 OF 1

Name Title Location
David King Chairman 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Stephen C. Cook Lead Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Michael E. Ching Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Tom E. McCormick President/CEO/Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Carla S. Mashinski Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Terry D. McCallister Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Jose R. Rodriguez Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 John P. Schauerman Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Patricia K. Wagner Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 143 of 224

ARB, INC. – BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ARB, INC.

P AGE 1 OF 1

Name Title Location
Tom E. McCormick Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 John Perisich Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Ken Dodgen Director 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 Timothy R. Healy Director 26000 Commercentre Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 144 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Grayson Repowering Project – Award of Demolition & Site Improvement Contract, and Amendments to Professional Services Agreements.

5. Resolution of Appropriation

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 21, 2023 Calendar
145 of 224

28c
3 9
1 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Grayson Repowering Project, as approved by City Council, consists of three primary phases: Unit 9 Separation which includes the decoupling of Unit 9 from the rest of the power plant that is planned for demolition; Demolition and Site Improvement which includes hazardous material abatement, demolition, disposal/recycling, structural backfill, and site geotechnical improvement; and, Engineering, Procurement, and Construction of new facilities including a 3-engine 54-megawatt (MW) Wartsila power plant, a 75-MW/300-megawatt-hour battery energy storage system, and replacing the obsolete control system on Unit 9 and associated facilities.

Staff requested proposals for the Demolition and Site Improvement work and found Silverado to be the top-ranked proposer. Staff has concluded negotiations with Silverado and is recommending award based on a best value basis. Silverado also happened to be the lowest priced proposer. The recommended contract with Silverado would cost $27,218,735 with 20% contingency of $5,443,747, totaling $32,662,482.

Staff is also seeking authorization to amend the PSA with Stantec, Black & Veatch, and CP Squared for additional professional services through project completion on a time and material basis.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Infrastructure: The Grayson Repowering Project will replace the aging infrastructure at the Grayson Power Plant with state-of-the-art generation and storage technology providing GWP with the ability to quickly start and generate smaller increments of power when needed, the ability to balance and integrate renewable resources, and the ability to store energy that is a major step in transitioning the City toward a 100% renewable power portfolio.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the following agreements and actions associated with the Grayson Repowering Project:
a. Award of a contract with Silverado for Demolition and Site Improvement in the amount of $27,218,735, plus a 20% contingency in the amount of $5,443,747; b. Amendment to existing PSA with Stantec for additional “as needed” professional environmental support services in an amount not to exceed $700,000; c. Amendment to existing PSA with Black & Veatch for additional “as needed” Owner’s Engineering services in an amount not to exceed $3,600,000; d. Amendment to existing PSA with CP Squared for additional “as needed” project management and consulting services in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000; and
e. Adopt a resolution appropriating the required funds.

BACKGROUND
On September 21, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-147 dispensing with competitive bidding and authorized the General Manager of GWP to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the proposed Grayson Repowering Project - Demolition and Site Improvement. City Council determined that it is in the best interest of the City to do so 146 of 224

38c
3 9
1 3
for several reasons including the need to select a contractor with verifiable and demonstrated safety-first program, with strong expertise in abatement, removal, handling, and disposal of hazardous material, as well as with soils, compaction, and grading work, and a well thought-out demolition plan. The work also involves engineering and professional services including planning for the safe and orderly demolition of buildings and structures, and the improvement of the site’s geotechnical conditions.

On October 12, 2021, GWP issued an RFP for Demolition and Site Improvement for the Proposed Grayson Repowering Project, Specification No. 3905. The RFP was posted on the City’s website and on eBidboard.com. A total of thirteen addendums were issued clarifying and modifying RFP documents and providing relevant project information.

Modifications to the RFP documents included the deletion of scope and references to the Grayson Repowering Project Alternative 8. The proposal deadline was postponed three times, for various reasons, including a final decision on the form of repowering and to give interested proposers sufficient time to review additional information provided as addenda. GWP responded to a total of seventy-seven written proposer questions.

On October 19, 2021, a mandatory pre-proposal conference was held at the GWP Utility Operations Center where GWP staff and consultants explained the scope of the project and answered questions from prospective proposers. A total of twenty-four individuals representing thirteen different prime and sub-contractors attended the conference. The conference was followed by a detailed group tour of the Grayson Power Plant. Four additional detailed group tours, on four different days, were conducted to allow prime contractors and their sub-contractors to tour the project site and gather information for their proposals. Each tour lasted for approximately two hours and was attended by at least fourteen individuals representing seven different prime/sub-contractors. Only the prime contractors who attended the mandatory pre-proposal conference or their prospective subcontractors were allowed to attend the additional site visits.

On December 13, 2022, City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-189 which, amongst other actions, directed staff to complete the bidding process for the Demolition and Site Improvement of Grayson Power Plant Units 1-8 and environmental remediation of the Grayson site, and following award to enter into a contract for the same.

On December 15, 2022, GWP received three proposals in response to the RFP for Demolition and Site Improvement for the Proposed Grayson Repowering Project, Request for Proposals - Specification No. 3905.

ANALYSIS
Upon review of the proposals, all three were found to meet the required minimum mandatory qualifications. Following a review of the proposals, a set of clarifying questions was prepared and emailed to each of the Proposers for their response. All three proposers responded prior to their formal presentation as requested. A formal presentation was provided by all three proposers where Staff had the opportunity to evaluate the project team’s cohesiveness, their understanding of the project, and their plan to safely demolish the plant and improve the site soil conditions as requested.

Silverado’s proposal was determined to be the highest evaluated on a best value basis. 147 of 224

48c
3 9
1 3
Their proposal offered the lowest cost while also achieving the highest score as specified in the Instructions to Proposers. Silverado also proposed a $1.8 million value engineering alternative – deep soil mixing – that could potentially further reduce the cost of the demolition/soil improvement work and is also of interest to Wartsila to potentially reduce their cost and schedule by reducing the need for piles. Silverado, by adjusting their work schedule, can complete the Demolition and Site Improvement work within the City’s planned 14-month schedule.

Staff checked the State of California Contractor’s License Board and found Silverado to have current, active and in good standing licenses. Silverado has satisfactorily completed similar demolition work in Southern California, notably the demolition of Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Scattergood Unit 3 and Haynes Generating Station.

Staff recommends a reserve of twenty percent (20%), or $5,443,747, for contingencies for this portion of the project. The size of this contingency request is driven largely by the 82-year operational age of the site and by the potential for unknown underground conditions that we cannot see. As an example, while extensive sampling from the surface was performed, as well as some soil borings, the fuel oil tanks under the cooling towers extend approximately 20 feet below grade. There is the potential that over the years these tanks have leaked and, if that is the case, more excavation may be required than was planned. Until the tanks are exposed and removed, the true need for and extent of contaminated soil removal remains unknown. Hence the larger than normal contingency request. Proposal pricing for hazmat abatement and related services, in addition to what has already been identified in surveys, is based on estimated quantities and unit pricing. Actual field conditions will determine the final cost of closure.

Project Description: The abatement and demolition of Grayson Units 1 through 8 and associated structures and facilities;
structural backfill; site geotechnical improvement; and related services in connection with the Grayson
Repowering Project.

RFP Approved: September 21, 2021
Advertisement Method: City website and eBidBoard.com
RFP Issued: October 12, 2021
RFP Due Date: December 15, 2022
Company Name(s) and
Proposal Amount(s):

Silverado Contractors, Inc. - $27,218,735.00
American Integrated Services, Inc. - $37,918,575.00
Remedial Construction Services, L.P. - $50,466,016.76
Selection Criteria
(If SS, list applicable
Provision):

Evaluation Criteria
The proposals were evaluated using the following
criteria and recommended for award on a best value
basis, as determined by the City.

•Minimum Mandatory Qualifications – Pass/Fail
148 of 224

58c
3 9
1 3
•Base Proposal Price (See Attachment 34.2-7) –
45% (45 points)
•Conformance with City Requirements; Proposed
Schedule of Values –5% (5 points)
•Conformance with Technical Requirements –
10% (10 points)
•Proposal Supplement and Presentation – 15%
(15 points) The City will consider value
engineering proposals, if any, made in the
Proposal Supplement and may add up to a total
of five additional points to the Proposer's score
based upon the City's evaluation thereof.
•Proposer Qualifications – 25% (25 points)
Consultant(s): Clean Power Consulting Partners
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

Black & Veatch Corp.

New / Existing
Consultant(s):

New
Procurement Method
(RFP / SS):

RFP
Contract Term:

14 months
Project Begins: Pre-mobilization May 2023
Mobilization at the site July 2023 or earlier if possible Project Ends: August 2024
Change Orders (When Applicable)
Company name: N/A
Original Approved
Contract Amount:

N/A
Approved Contingency: N/A
Change Order History: N/A
This Change Order
(Increase):

N/A
New Contract Total (If
Approved):

N/A
Stantec
Staff seeks authorization to amend an existing PSA with Stantec to provide funding for additional “as needed” environmental support services for the remainder of the project.

Specific tasks to be performed include:
•Historical recordation of the Boiler Building in accordance with the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Mitigation Measures
•Traffic Control Plan
149 of 224

68c
3 9
1 3
•Updating of the noise model with three Wartsila engines to determine if we can reduce some of the noise mitigation measures and associated cost •Preparation of a safety/environmental awareness training video for all site workers during demolition and construction
•Third party environmental monitoring of the demolition and construction work •Final noise performance testing at completion
Stantec has been serving as the City’s environmental consultant for the Grayson Repowering Project since 2014 and has prepared the Draft and Final EIR. The services would be provided on a time and materials basis for an amount not to exceed $700,000.

This is an estimate of the additional services that may be needed to project completion.

Black & Veatch
Staff seeks authorization to amend an existing PSA with Black & Veatch to provide funding for additional “as needed” Owner’s Engineering services for the remainder of the project. Specific tasks to be performed include:
•Review of the Wartsila and Balance of Site EPC design submittals. Black & Veatch is acting in a delegated capacity on behalf of the City to review the design.
•Oversight of the demolition work
•Confirmatory geotechnical studies to confirm that the soil improvement work achieved its purpose.

Black & Veatch has been serving as the City’s Owner’s Engineer for the Grayson Repowering Project since 2020 and has helped with preparation of the Unit 9 Separation bid specification, Demolition/Site Improvement RFP, review of the Wartsila and Tesla engineering submittals, as well as the conceptual design for the project and detailed design for separating Unit 9. The services would be provided on a time and materials basis for an amount not to exceed $3,600,000. This is an estimate of the additional services that may be needed to project completion.

CP Squared
Mr. David Tateosian, P.E. of CP Squared, has been serving as the project manager for the Grayson Repowering Project since 2019. Mr. Tateosian has also been providing valuable consulting services since 2014. Staff seeks authorization to increase the not- to-exceed amount of an existing PSA by $1,200,000 to cover project management and consulting services for the remainder of the project. This is an estimate of the project management services that will be needed to project completion. The services will be provided on a time and materials basis.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
GWP anticipates that the Grayson Repowering Project will be funded through a single bond issuance. On July 19, 2016, and July 23, 2019, the City Council adopted Bond Reimbursement Resolutions which allow the City to recoup expenditures made for the Grayson Repowering Project development from bond proceeds, if and when bonds are 150 of 224

78c
3 9
1 3
issued for the project. Staff will be presenting a bond ordinance to City Council in the coming months once the Cost of Service Analysis is complete.

The contract and PSA amendments will cost a total of $38,162,482, which was not included as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting an appropriation of $38,162,482 from the Electric Surplus Fund Balance. The appropriation requests are outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$32,662,482 GL: 27900-5810-
GWP-0000
GL: 43110-5830-GWP-
0020-P0000-
PL: GWP00171BN
Electric Surplus
Fund Balance
$4,800,000 GL: 27900-5810-
GWP-0000
GL: 43110-5830-GWP-
0020-P0000-
PL: GWP00170CN
Electric Surplus
Fund Balance
$700,000 GL: 27900-5810-
GWP-0000
GL: 43110-5830-GWP-
0020-P0000-
PL: P13748
Electric Surplus
Fund Balance

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On February 15, 2023, the City certified a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Grayson Repowering Project (“Project”) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (14 Cal Code Regs. 15000 et seq. and Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) The Project includes all aspects of Project implementation, including, demolition and site improvements. The action presented to the City Council here involves the award of the demolition and site improvement contract and amendments to professional services agreements for the Project analyzed in the certified FEIR.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744, the attachment to this Report contains the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest or more in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item (see Exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4).

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize and approve the actions requested and recommended herein.

Alternative 2: Do not authorize and approve the actions described herein. However, doing so would delay the implementation of the Grayson Repowering Project.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternatives not proposed by staff. 151 of 224

88c
3 9
1 3

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Scott Mellon, P.E., Assistant General Manager - Power Management Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Silverado Contractors, Inc.

Exhibit 2: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

Exhibit 3: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Black & Veatch Corp.

Exhibit 4: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Clean Power Consulting Partners 152 of 224

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale, having previously by Resolution No. 21-147, dispensed with competitive bidding and authorized the City Manager to issue a Request For Proposals (RFP) for the Demolition and Site Improvement for the Grayson Repowering Project, hereby accepts and approves the proposal of Silverado Contractors, Inc. for the Grayson Repowering Project – Demolition and Site Improvement (RFP No. 3905), as recommended by the Report dated March 21, 2023 by the General Manager of Glendale Water & Power, and authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, subject to approval by the City Attorney, to enter into a contract with Silverado Contractors, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $27,218,735, plus a twenty percent (20%) contingency in the amount of $5,443,747.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
153 of 224

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an amendment to the City’s existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA), contract number 8000053, with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec), to add the sum of $700,000 to provide additional “as needed” professional environmental support services for the Grayson Repowering Project for a new total contract not-to-exceed amount of $2,368,582. The form of said amendment shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
154 of 224

8 1
1 7

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an amendment to the City’s existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA), contract number 8000847, with Black & Veatch Corporation (Black & Veatch), to add the sum of $3,600,000 for additional “as needed” Owner’s Engineering services for the Grayson Repowering Project, for a new contract not-to-exceed amount of $6,373,068.

The form of said amendment shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
155 of 224

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an amendment to the City’s existing Professional Services Agreement (PSA), contract number 8000941, with Clean Power Consulting Partners (CP Squared), to add the sum of $1,200,000 to provide additional as needed project management and consulting services for the Grayson Repowering Project for a new contract not-to-exceed amount of $1,650,000. The form of said amendment shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
156 of 224

157 of 224

158 of 224

EXHIBIT 1
159 of 224

160 of 224

161 of 224

162 of 224

163 of 224

164 of 224

165 of 224

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE

The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and subsequently amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 and Ordinance No. 5885, which became effective on November 3, 2016 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), the Successor Agency (“SA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, SA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, SA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, SA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, SA’s, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, SA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, SA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
• The City Contract is subject to City Council approval; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts totaling $50,000 or more is subject to Council approval.
• A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects , have an aggregate value of $25,000 or more.

Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization

Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
N/A Chairperson
Gordon A. Johnston Chief Executive Officer / President 400-10220 103 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T5J 0K4 Stuart E. Lerner Chief Operating Officer 475 Fifth Avenue 12th Floor New York NY 10017-7239 Theresa Jang Chief Financial Officer 400-10220 103 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T5J 0K4 Stuart E. Lerner and
Jeffrey P. Stone Board of Directors Stu Lerner address above / Jeff Stone (61 Commercial Street Suite 100) Rochester NY 14614-1009 Mustang Acquisition Holdings Inc. More than 10% interest owner 370 Interlocken Boulevard, Suite 200 Broomfield CO 80021-8009 * “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, SA, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership 166 of 224

Rev. 11/8/17

interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by th at person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prim e contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by: NA

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
 I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure;  The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and  I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is 2 pages.

Executed on: March 9 , 20 23 , at: Thousand Oaks , California.

Signature: Print Full Name: StephAnnie Roberts

Address: 290 Conejo Ridge Avenue, Thousand Oaks, CA 91361

Phone Number: 805-719-9332 E-mail Address: [email protected]

Roberts, StephAnnie
Digitally signed by Roberts, StephAnnie
Date: 2023.03.09 16:43:30 -08'00'
167 of 224

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011 , and subsequently amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15 , 2012 and Ordinance No. 5885, which became effective on November 3, 2016 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), the Successor Agency (“SA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, SA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, SA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer ; and (2) Council members, SA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, SA’s, or HA ’s approval. A contract with the City, SA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Mario Azar Chairperson 11401 Lamar Ave. Overland Park KS 66211 Mario Azar Chief Executive Officer / President 11401 Lamar Ave. Overland Park KS 66211 N/A Chief Operating Officer
Michael Williams Chief Financial Officer 11401 Lamar Ave. Overland Park KS 66211 (Listed at bottom of page) Board of Directors 11401 Lamar Ave. Overland Park KS 66211 N/A More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, SA, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Office r, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in th at person, entity, or organizati on, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Board Members: Nomi Bergman, Derek Glanvill, Sanjay Kapoor, Andrew G. McMaster Jr, Vicki O’Meara, Mike Orth, Timothy W. Triplett, Laszlo Von Lazar, Randy G. Woelfel 168 of 224

Rev. 11/8/17

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contr actor. Subcontractor includes any member of that p erson’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Office r, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in th at person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION

On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
▪ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ▪ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ▪ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is 2 pages.

Executed on: 10 March , 20 23 at: Denver , Colorado.

Signature: Print Full Name: Jon R. Feickert

Address: 4600 S. Syracuse Street, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80237

Phone Number: 913-458-2379 E-mail Address: [email protected] 169 of 224

EXHIBIT 4
170 of 224

171 of 224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: City Council Resolution in Support of the Inclusion of an “Armenian” Checkbox Under the MENA Category in the 2030 U.S. Census.

1. Resolution Supporting the Inclusion of an “Armenian” Checkbox under the MENA Category in the 2030 U.S. Census

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for March 21, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has released a new draft questionnaire for the 2030 Census with a public comment period ending April 12, 2023.

In this new proposed questionnaire, the old racial and ethnic categories have been revamped and new categories are proposed including a MENA (Middle East and North Africa) category that includes subcategories such as Lebanese, Syrian, Iranian, etc.

Previously, these populations, including Armenians, were incorporated under the “white” racial category. This no longer will be the case.

The City of Glendale, home to the highest concentration of Armenian Americans in the U.S., currently lacks meaningful and comprehensive data on its Armenian population.

The lack of accurate federal, state, and local data on Armenians has large ramifications for the Armenian population of Glendale including receiving services, funding, and support on issues such as housing, healthcare, business, and education.

The City of Glendale presently has a unique opportunity to advocate for the accurate counting of its Armenian residents by adopting a resolution in support of an “Armenian” checkbox within the MENA category on the 2030 Census questionnaire.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
N/A
172 of 224

28d
4 0
8 6

RECOMMENDATION
The City Clerk recommends that the Council adopt a Resolution in support of the inclusion of an “Armenian” checkbox under the MENA Category in the 2030 U.S.

Census.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Armenian Americans are not accurately counted in the United States Census, which shapes both federal, state, and local categories, and resultant funding, opportunities, and anti-discrimination efforts.

Armenian Americans have long histories of immigration, refugeehood, and racialization, as well as legal, educational, workplace and linguistic marginalization. However, their classification under the “white” category obfuscates their experiences and renders the community invisible.

For example, in the City of Glendale, where approximately one third to forty percent of the population identifies as having Armenian ancestry, the latest demographic information for Glendale, according to the Census Bureau, reads 61.1% white, 18.7% Hispanic or Latino, 13.7% Asian, 1.8% Black or African American, 0.4% American Indian and Alaskan Native and 0.1% Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander. This renders the Armenian community invisible within federal data.

Another example is the racial/ethnic breakdown of poverty rates of Glendale women from 2017-2021. Census data shows that 17% of white women, 16% of Latinas, 11% of African American women and 5% of Asian American women live on incomes below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). There is no existing data on Armenian women and particularly, on the elderly women who live on incomes below FPL. Disaggregating the “white” category would provide more meaningful information on the status of Armenian women in the city.

The recent redistricting of the City of Glendale between two Assembly Districts is another example of how the current racial/ethnic classifications do not provide Armenian Americans with voting rights protections that other populations have.

The United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has released a new draft questionnaire for the 2030 Census, in which the old racial/ethnic categories have been changed and new categories are proposed including a Middle East and North Africa (MENA) category (See exhibit 1). The proposed subcategories within the MENA category that are given checkboxes are Lebanese, Syrian, Iranian, Moroccan, Egyptian, and Israeli. Other categories that are mentioned as examples of MENA are Algerian, Iraqi, and Kurdish. However, there is no “Armenian” category checkbox or mention even though Armenian Americans have been considered as MENA peoples by the OMB and 173 of 224

38d
4 0
8 6
were the second largest group of the MENA respondents on the opt-in ancestry question in the 2000 Census (See exhibit 2).

The Armenian American community currently lacks meaningful federal, state, and local data as a group, while being one of the largest and most impacted groups within MENA according to OMB data. This has significant impacts on the representation, quality of life, and rights of Armenian Americans in the United States as a whole and within the City of Glendale.

The lack of accurate federal, state, and local data on Armenian Americans has large ramifications for the Armenian American population of Glendale shaping issues such as housing, healthcare, business, and education.

The City of Glendale presently has a unique opportunity to advocate for the accurate counting of its Armenian American residents by passing a resolution in support of an “Armenian” checkbox within the MENA category on the 2030 Census questionnaire which will in turn bring much needed information, funding, and resources to the city.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This matter is not a project subject to CEQA as there is no reasonable possibility it will have any foreseeable effect on the environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Adopt the resolution in support of the inclusion of an “Armenian” checkbox under the MENA category in the 2030 U.S. Census.

Alternative 2: Not approve resolution as submitted.

Alternative 3: City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Dr. Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Responses to the Ancestry Question in the 2000 Census 174 of 224

48d
4 0
8 6
Exhibit 2: U.S. OMB proposed changes for the 2030 Census 175 of 224

8 1
6 0
RESOLUTION NO. __________

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA IN SUPPORT OF THE INCLUSION OF AN “ARMENIAN” CHECKBOX IN THE 2030 CENSUS
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale is home to the largest concentration of Armenian Americans in the United States, and meaningful and comprehensive data on its Armenian American population is currently lacking; and WHEREAS, the federal Office of Management and Budget recently released a new draft questionnaire for the 2030 Census that includes a new MENA Category with subcategories such as Lebanese, Syrian, Iranian, and other populations; and WHEREAS, Armenian Americans constitute a transnational group across MENA and are historically one of the largest and most impacted groups of immigrants in the United States from the MENA region; and
WHEREAS, Armenian Americans, together with other MENA immigrant and refugee communities within the U.S., continue to be under-resourced and underserved; and
WHEREAS, Armenian Americans overwhelmingly support census classification for their community and have been pushing for the inclusion of an “Armenian” Checkbox in the U.S. Census questionnaire for many decades; and
WHEREAS, the inclusion of the MENA category and a specific “Armenian” checkbox within the MENA category of the 2030 Census would provide the City of Glendale with more accurate data on all of its residents, which would ultimately bring more resources and funding for the City to address issues related to housing, healthcare, business, education, and voting rights; and WHEREAS, Armenian Americans currently do not receive federal, state, and local recourse because they are not correctly classified in the U.S. Census, and are excluded from health programs, business programs, and lack voting rights protections, educational funding, and other resources;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Glendale fully supports the inclusion of a specific “Armenian” checkbox within the MENA category 176 of 224

8 1
6 0
of the 2030 Census, and urges the United States Office of Management and Budget to adopt this recommendation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Glendale expresses its support for community organizations that are advocating for the inclusion of the MENA category and an “Armenian” checkbox in the 2030 U.S. Census; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Glendale directs the City Manager to send a letter to the Office of Management and Budget expressing the City’s support for the inclusion of an “Armenian” checkbox under the proposed MENA category in the 2030 Census and explaining the importance of this inclusion for the Armenian American community of Glendale, California and the U.S. as a whole.

ADOPTED this __________ day of ________, 2023.
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________

CITY CLERK
I, Dr. Suzie Abajian, the Clerk to the Glendale City Council, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ________ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Glendale on the _______day of ______, 2023, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
177 of 224

5375 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices 1 62 FR 58723 (Oct. 20, 1997), available at https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1997-10-30/pdf/
97-28653.pdf.
is planned to continue through 2036,
with regular updating of these statistics
planned thereafter.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : For
additional information, contact: Andrew
Stawasz, email:

NaturalCapitalAccounting@
omb.eop.gov, telephone: (202) 881–
7051.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
22, 2022, OMB, on behalf the Working
Group, issued ‘‘Request for Information
To Support the Development of a
Strategic Plan on Statistics for
Environmental-Economic Decisions.’’ 87
FR 51450. The Working Group is co-
chaired by OMB, the Office of Science
and Technology Policy, and the
Department of Commerce. The Request
for Information announced the
availability of a draft document entitled
‘‘National Strategy to Develop Statistics
for Environmental-Economic Decisions:

A U.S. System of Natural Capital
Accounting and Associated
Environmental-Economic Statistics’’
(Strategic Plan) and initiated a 60-day
public comment period. Public
comments received are available via
www.regulations.gov under docket
number OMB–2022–0009. The Working
Group revised the Strategic Plan in
response to comments and other
information received and is now
announcing the availability of the final
Strategic Plan, available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/
uploads/2023/01/Natural-Capital-
Accounting-Strategy-final.pdf.

Following the Administration’s
commitment to initiate natural capital
accounts and environmental-economic
statistics in April 2022, Statistics for
Environmental-Economic Decisions
makes five recommendations to Federal
departments and agencies for how to
develop and use natural capital
accounts and environmental-economic
statistics.

1. The natural capital accounts and
environmental-economic statistics
should be pragmatic and provide
information to:
a. Guide sustainable development and
macroeconomic decision making;
b. Support Federal decision making in
programmatic, policy, and regulatory
settings;
c. Provide structure and data that
promote the competitiveness of U.S.
businesses;
d. Support resilient state, territorial,
Indigenous, Tribal, and local
communities; and
e. Facilitate conservation and
environmental policy.

2. The natural capital accounts and
associated environmental-economic
statistics should provide domestic
comparability through time and advance
international comparisons and
harmonization in order to enable the
United States to lead with respect to the
development of global standards and
implementation of those standards.

3. The natural capital accounts and
associated environmental-economic
statistics should be embedded in the
broader U.S. economic statistical
system, and guide the process of
embedding with three sub-
recommendations. Federal departments
and agencies should:
a. Incorporate the internationally-
agreed standards of the U.N. System of
Environmental Economic Accounting to
guide development of U.S. natural
capital accounts, where those standards
are relevant to the United States and
robustly developed. This includes
following the standard supply-use
framework that structures national
economic accounts;
b. Adhere to more than one, but a
small number of, specific asset
boundaries, connected to economic
activities, in order to accommodate
different applications and contexts and
be inclusive of different uses and
perspectives; and
c. Use rigorous and the best available
economic science for monetizing the
value of natural assets.

4. Federal departments and agencies
should use a 15-year phased approach
to transition from research grade
environmental-economic statistics and
natural capital accounts to core
statistical products, and produce a
single headline summary statistic, along
with supporting products, tables and
reports that provide information in
physical and monetary units.
a. The phased approach is designed to
enable new information to be available
early in the process, facilitate the first
pilot accounts appearing in 2023,
provide for testing and development,
while over the long term meeting high
statistical standards and producing a
durable and more comprehensive set of
statistics to expand the national
economic accounts.
b. The Strategic Plan recommends
that natural capital accounts produce a
new forward-looking headline measure
focused on the change in wealth held in
nature: Change in Natural Asset Wealth.

Integrating this new measure with
changes in GDP would provide a more
complete and more useful view of U.S.
economic progress. Pairing Change in
Natural Asset Wealth with GDP would
help society tell if today’s consumption
is being accomplished without
compromising the future opportunities
that nature provides.
c. The Strategic Plan also
recommends the use of dashboards for
biological and physical measures.

5. The Federal Government should
apply existing authorities and make use
of the substantial expertise within
Federal departments and agencies, by
coordinating across agencies, to develop
and update the system of natural capital
accounts and environmental-economic
statistics in an efficient manner.

Richard L. Revesz,
Administrator, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023–01608 Filed 1–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Initial Proposals For Updating OMB’s
Race and Ethnicity Statistical
Standards
AGENCY: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Executive
Office of the President.

ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.

SUMMARY: The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) requests comments
on the initial proposals from the Federal
Interagency Technical Working Group
on Race and Ethnicity Standards
(Working Group) for revising OMB’s
1997 Statistical Policy Directive No. 15:

Standards for Maintaining, Collecting,
and Presenting Federal Data on Race
and Ethnicity (SPD 15).
1 Responses to
this Notice will be shared with the
Working Group and will help the
Working Group develop their final
recommendations to OMB and will also
help OMB determine how to revise SPD
15 to improve the quality and
usefulness of Federal race and ethnicity
data.

DATES: Comments must be provided in
writing to OMB no later than 75 days
from the publication of this notice to
ensure consideration during the final
decision-making process.

ADDRESSES: Please submit comments via
http://www.regulations.gov, a Federal
website that allows the public to find,
review, and submit comments on
documents that agencies have published
in the Federal Register and that are
open for comment. Simply type ‘‘OMB–
2023–0001’’ in the Comment or
Submission search box, click Go, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 178 of 224

5376 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices 2 44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(1).
3 44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(3).
4 See Reviewing and Revising Standards for
Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal
Data on Race and Ethnicity, June 15, 2022, https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2022/06/
15/reviewing-and-revising-standards-for-
maintaining-collecting-and-presenting-federal-data-
on-race-and-ethnicity/.
5 SPD 15 currently lists ‘‘Cuban’’ two times.
follow the instructions for submitting
comments.

Comments submitted in response to
this notice are subject to the Freedom of
Information Act and may be made
available to the public. For this reason,
please do not include any information
of a confidential nature, such as
sensitive personal information or
proprietary information. If you submit
your email address, it will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket. Please note that
responses to this public comment
request containing any routine notice
about the confidentiality of the
communication will be treated as public
comments that may be made available to
the public notwithstanding the
inclusion of the routine notice.

Electronic Availability: This
document is available on the internet at
http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Bob
Sivinski, Chair, Interagency Technical
Working Group on Race and Ethnicity
Standards, 1650 17th St. NW,
Washington, DC 20500, email address:

[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Background
Functions of the Chief Statistician of
the United States: To operate efficiently
and effectively, the Nation relies on the
flow of objective, credible statistics to
support the decisions of individuals,
households, governments, businesses,
and other organizations.

As part of its role as coordinator of the
Federal statistical system under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB,
through the Chief Statistician of the
United States, must ensure the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
system as well as the integrity,
objectivity, impartiality, utility, and
confidentiality of information collected
for statistical purposes.
2 This statute
also charges OMB with developing and
overseeing the implementation of
Government-wide principles, policies,
standards, and guidelines concerning
the development, presentation, and
dissemination of statistical
information.
3 OMB maintains a set of statistical
policy directives to implement these
requirements. OMB’s established
process for updating existing statistical
policy directives includes technical
evaluation of the current standard by an
interagency working group composed of
career Federal subject matter experts;
additional technical research, testing,
and analysis to close identified gaps;
and solicitation and consideration of
public comment on ways to improve the
standard. The final decisions regarding
any changes to the standards are made
by OMB.

This Federal Register Notice is part of
OMB’s current review
4 of SPD 15. It
requests comments on the initial
proposals from the Federal Interagency
Technical Working Group on Race and
Ethnicity Standards (Working Group).

Responses to this Notice will help the
Working Group develop their final
recommendations to OMB and will also
help OMB determine how to revise SPD
15 to improve the quality and
usefulness of Federal race and ethnicity
data.

History of SPD 15: OMB initially
developed SPD 15 in 1977, in
cooperation with other Federal agencies,
to provide consistent data on race and
ethnicity (when aggregated to the
minimum reporting categories)
throughout the Federal Government,
including the decennial census,
household surveys, and Federal
administrative forms (e.g., benefit
application forms). Initial development
of this data standard stemmed in large
part from Federal responsibilities to
enforce civil rights laws. Since 1977,
SPD 15 has been revised one time,
resulting in the 1997 Standards for
Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting
Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity.

The Goals of SPD 15: The goals of
SPD 15 are to ensure the comparability
of race and ethnicity across Federal
datasets and to maximize the quality of
that data by ensuring that the format,
language, and procedures for collecting
the data are consistent and based on
rigorous evidence. To achieve these
goals, SPD 15 provides a minimum set
of categories that all Federal agencies
must use if they intend to collect
information on race and ethnicity,
regardless of the collection mechanism
(e.g., Federal surveys versus program
benefit applications).

The 1997 Standards (Current
Standards): For data collected directly
from respondents, the current standards
require two separate race and ethnicity
questions, with the ethnicity question
collected first before the race question.
• For the question ‘‘Are you Hispanic
or Latino?’’, the minimum reporting
categories are:

1. Hispanic or Latino: A person of
Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban
5,
South or Central American, or other
Spanish culture or origin, regardless of
race. The term, ‘‘Spanish origin,’’ can be
used in addition to ‘‘Hispanic or
Latino.’’

2. Not Hispanic or Latino
Note that Hispanic or Latino
respondents may be of any race, and
multiple responses to the ethnicity
question are not permitted.
• For the question and instructions
‘‘What is your race? <‘Mark’ or ‘Select’>
one or more’’, the minimum reporting
categories are:

1. American Indian or Alaska Native:

A person having origins in any of the
original peoples of North and South
America (including Central America),
and who maintains tribal affiliation or
community attachment.

2. Asian: A person having origins in
any of the original peoples of the Far
East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian
subcontinent including, for example,
Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea,
Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine
Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

3. Black or African American: A
person having origins in any of the
black racial groups of Africa. Terms
such as ‘‘Haitian’’ or ‘‘Negro’’ can be
used in addition to ‘‘Black or African
American.’’

4. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander: A person having origins in any
of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam,
Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

5. White: A person having origins in
any of the original peoples of Europe,
the Middle East, or North Africa.

The 1997 revision of SPD15 gave
respondents the opportunity to report
multiple races.

Example Question Format: Based on
the requirements in the current
standards, Figure 1 illustrates how race
and ethnicity questions typically appear
on Federal surveys and forms that
collect the minimally required
categories directly from individuals.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 179 of 224

5377 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices 6 https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/
demo/technical-documentation/hhp/Phase_36_
Household_Pulse_Survey_ENGLISH.pdf.
7 See Science, State, Justice, Commerce, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, Public
Law 109–108, tit. II, 119 Stat. 2290, 2308–09 (2005),
available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-
congress/house-bill/2862.
8 OMB convened this group under its authorities
in 44 U.S.C. 3504(e),
9 See 44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(8).

Self-Identification vs. Observed Race
and Ethnicity: The 1997 standards
emphasize that self-identification using
separate race and ethnicity questions is
the preferred means of obtaining
information about an individual’s race
and ethnicity. However, 1997 standards
allow using a combined race and
ethnicity question format where
observer identification is the only or
most feasible collection mode.

Collection of More Detailed Data: The
1997 standards encourage the collection
of more detailed information provided
that any detailed groups can be
aggregated to the minimum standard
categories necessary to facilitate
comparison of data generated from
information collections of varying
detail. For example, the Household
Pulse Survey
6 conducted by the U.S.

Census Bureau offers respondents
several additional options for racial and
ethnic identification that can be ‘‘rolled
up’’ to the minimum categories in the
standards.

How the 1997 Standards Define Race
and Ethnicity: The categories developed
represent a sociopolitical construct
designed to be used in the self-reported
or observed collection of data on the
race and ethnicity of major broad
population groups in this country and
are not biologically or genetically based.

The 1997 standards’ minimum
categories do not identify or designate
certain population groups as ‘‘minority
groups.’’ Additionally, the standards
state that these categories are not to be
used for determining the eligibility of
population groups for participation in
any Federal programs.

Some Other Race: Under the 1997
standards, data collections by Federal
agencies may not include a Some Other
Race (SOR) response category unless
required by statute. Since 2005, the
decennial census and American
Community Survey (ACS) are required
by law
7 to include a SOR category,
thereby adding a sixth minimum race
category for these collections. The
decennial census and ACS are the only
information collections with a statutory
requirement for the use of a SOR
category.

B. The Current Review of SPD 15
The Need to Update SPD 15: OMB
undertakes periodic reviews of its
Federal statistical standards to ensure
that they are keeping pace with changes
in the population and evolving needs
and uses for data. Federal race and
ethnicity standards are inherently
complex because they seek to capture
dynamic and fluid sociopolitical
constructs. Over the nearly 25 years
since SPD 15 was revised there have
been large societal, political, economic,
and demographic shifts in the United
States throughout this period, for
example:
• Increasing racial and ethnic
diversity;
• A growing number of people who
identify as more than one race or
ethnicity; and
• Changing immigration and
migration patterns.

Federal Interagency Technical
Working Group on Race and Ethnicity
Standards: In 2022, OMB convened the
Federal Interagency Technical Working
Group on Race and Ethnicity Standards
(Working Group).
8 Consistent with the
established OMB process discussed
above, the Working Group comprises
Federal career staff who represent
programs that collect or use race and
ethnicity data. The agencies on the
Interagency Council on Statistical
Policy, i.e., the 13 Principle Statistical
Agencies;
9 and the 24 agencies
enumerated by the Chief Financial
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1 EN27JA23.022</GPH>
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Figure 1. 1997 SPD lS's Two-Questions Format for Self-Response Are you Hispanic or Latino?
□ No, not Hispanic or
□ Yes, Hispanic or
□ Asian
□ Black or
iian or Other Pacific Islander
□ White
180 of 224

5378 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices 10 See 31 U.S.C. 901(b).
11 See Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Exec. Office of
the President, Standards for Maintaining,
Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and
Ethnicity, 81 R 67398 (Sept. 30, 2016), available at
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/
09/30/2016-23672/standards-for-maintaining-
collecting-andpresenting-federal-data-on-race-and-
ethnicity; Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Exec. Office of
the President, Proposals From the Federal
Interagency Working Group for Revision of the
Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and
Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity, 82
FR 12242 (Mar. 1, 2017), available at https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/03/01/
2017-03973/proposals-from-the-federal-
interagencyworking-group-for-revision-of-the-
standards-for-maintaining.
12 https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/
decennial-census/decade/2020/planning-
management/plan/final-analysis/2015nct-race-
ethnicity-analysis.html; https://wwwn.cdc.gov/
qbank/report/Willson_2017_NCHS_MENA.pdf.
13 https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/
08/improved-race-ethnicity-measures-reveal-united-
states-population-much-more-multiracial.html.
14 https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/
uploads/2022/04/eo13985-vision-for-equitable-
data.pdf.
15 OMB Launches New Public Listening Sessions
on Federal Race and Ethnicity Standards Revision,
August 30, 2022, https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
briefing-room/2022/08/30/omb-launches-new-
public-listening-sessions-on-federal-race-and-
ethnicity-standards-revision/.

Officers Act; 10 as well as one additional
agency selected for its reliance on race
and ethnicity data, the U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission,
were invited to nominate
representatives to the Working Group.

OMB charged the Working Group
with providing recommendations on
topics including, but not limited to:
• Whether the minimum reporting
categories should be changed and how
to best address detailed race and
ethnicity groups in the standards;
• Whether updates should be made to
the question format, terminology, and
wording of the questions, as well as the
instructions for respondents and
associated guidance; and
• Whether guidance for the collection
and reporting of race and ethnicity data
can be improved, including in instances
when self-identification is not possible.

The Working Group assessed the work
by the previous 2014–2018 Federal
Interagency Working Group for Research
on Race and Ethnicity,
11 existing
Federal Government research,12
experiences from the 2020 Census,13
and the work of the Interagency
Working Group on Equitable Data
pursuant to Executive Order 13985.
14 Additionally, the Working Group is also
relying on input from the public to help
with identifying needs and uses for
data. On August 30, OMB announced
the start of virtual, bi-monthly listening
sessions to hear directly from members
of the public.
15 These listening sessions
began in September 2022 and are
expected to continue in 2023. Although
most of these sessions did not take place
in time to inform the initial proposals in
this FRN, the information presented in
the sessions is currently being assessed
by the Working Group and will inform
their work as they develop final
recommendations for OMB. The major
themes of the comments heard during
the first several months of these
listening sessions are described below.

Major Themes From Initial Public
Listening Sessions
• Data Disaggregation for the Black or
African American Population
• Presenters supported adding
detailed categories for the Black or
African American minimum reporting
category to allow for identification for
descendants of enslaved Americans,
with most presenters requesting a new
detailed category such as ‘‘American
Freedman’’ or ‘‘American Descendant of
Slavery.’’
• Disaggregated data could be used to
allocate program or initiative benefits.
• Data Disaggregation for Race and
Ethnicity, General
• Presenters supported collecting
more granular data to better understand
within-group disparities (e.g., collecting
disaggregated data for the Asian
population, for example ‘‘Japanese’’,
‘‘Hmong’’, ‘‘Cambodian’’, allows for
better understanding existing socio-
economic and health disparities and
determining specific community needs).
• Presenters suggested that including
detailed racial and ethnic categories on
questionnaires is more inclusive and
allows respondents to report their
identities more easily.
• Race and Ethnicity Questions Format
• Some presenters supported a
combined race and ethnicity question
stating that, for example, respondents
do not understand a distinction between
‘‘race’’ and ‘‘ethnicity’’ and that the
separate questions format has
contributed to the rise of the ‘‘Some
Other Race’’ population in the decennial
census; additionally, some presenters
showed their own research findings that
a more successful design was a
combined race and ethnicity question
with descriptive options and allowing
for multiple selections.
• Additional presenters advised
against a combined race and ethnicity
question, expressing concern that race
data for the Hispanic or Latino
population may be lost (e.g., some
presenters worry that the Black or
African American population in Puerto
Rico may only select ‘‘Hispanic or
Latino’’ and not ‘‘Black or African
American’’ in a combined question
format, even with the instruction of
‘‘Select all that apply’’)
• Middle Eastern or North African
Category
• Presenters advocated for the Middle
Eastern or North African (MENA)
population to be recognized and
respected by becoming a new and
distinct minimum reporting category
because, for example, many in the
MENA community do not share the
same lived experience as White people
with European ancestry, do not identify
as White, and are not perceived as
White by others.
• The addition of a distinct MENA
minimum reporting category would
recognize this community (e.g., MENA
population counts could be used to
allocate needed resources).
• Collecting and Reporting Data for the
Multiracial/Ethnic Population
• Presenters recommended that SPD
15 permit the reporting and tabulation
of multiple Hispanic or Latino
responses (e.g., producing data from
respondents who are both ‘‘Cuban’’ and
‘‘Dominican,’’ ‘‘Mexican’’ and ‘‘Puerto
Rican,’’ etc).
• While some presenters advocated
for a ‘‘multiracial’’ checkbox, other
presenters opposed it expressing
concern that detailed information about
which specific racial and ethnic groups
an individual identifies with may be
lost.

Governing Principles of the Working
Group: In the deliberations leading to
the 1977 and the 1997 race and
ethnicity standards, principles were
established to guide interagency
consideration. For this current review,
the Working Group adopted the
following principles to guide their work.

1. Race and ethnicity are socio-
political constructs. For purposes of
these standards, the race and ethnicity
categories set forth are sociopolitical
constructs and are not an attempt to
define race and ethnicity biologically or
genetically.

2. Respect individuals. Respect for
individual dignity should guide the
processes and methods for collecting
data on race and ethnicity; respondent
self-identification should be facilitated
to the greatest extent possible.

3. Clear concepts and terminology. To
the extent practicable, the concepts and
terminology should reflect clear and
generally understood definitions that
can achieve broad public acceptance.

4. Comprehensive categories. The
racial and ethnic categories should be
comprehensive in coverage and produce
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 181 of 224

5379 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices compatible, non-duplicated,
exchangeable data across Federal
agencies.

5. Consider useful data aggregations.

Foremost consideration should be given
to data aggregations by race and
ethnicity that are useful for statistical
analysis, program administration and
assessment, and enforcement of existing
laws and judicial decisions—bearing in
mind that the standards are not
intended to be used to establish
eligibility for participation in any
Federal program.

6. Consider State/local government
data needs. While Federal needs for
racial and ethnic data are of primary
importance, consideration should also
be given to needs at the State and local
government levels, including American
Indian tribal and Alaska Native village
governments, as well as to general
societal needs for these data.

7. Standards set forth minimum
categories. The standards should set
forth minimum categories; additional
categories should be encouraged,
provided they can be aggregated to the
minimum categories. The number of
minimum categories should be kept to
a manageable size, as determined by
statistical concerns and data needs.

8. Consider operational feasibility. A
revised set of categories should be
operationally feasible in terms of burden
placed upon respondents and the cost to
agencies and respondents to implement
the revisions.

9. Category changes are based on
sound research. Any changes in the
categories should be based on sound
methodological research and should
include evaluations of the impact of any
changes not only on the usefulness of
the resulting data but also on the
comparability of any new categories
with the existing ones.

10. Category revisions require a
crosswalk. Any revision to the
categories should provide for a
crosswalk at the time of adoption
between the old and the new categories
so that historical data series can be
statistically adjusted and comparisons
can be made.

11. Changes are based upon an
interagency collaborative effort. Because
of the many and varied needs, and
strong interdependence, of Federal
agencies for racial and ethnic data, any
changes to the existing categories
should be the product of an interagency
collaborative effort.

12. All racial and ethnic categories
should adhere to public law. All racial
and ethnic categories, both established
and potential, should be reviewed and
constructed in a manner that adheres to
public law.

C. Initial Proposals for Comment
OMB requests comments on these
initial Working Group proposals. Note
that these proposals are preliminary and
do not reflect the settled opinions of the
Working Group, the position of OMB, or
the positions of the agencies
participating on the Working Group.

The Working Group will continue to
deliberate, assess evidence, and take
into consideration comments received
from the public before making final
recommendations for OMB’s
consideration.

1. Collect race and ethnicity
information using one combined
question. The Working Group proposes
that SPD 15 move from the two separate
questions format to a single combined
question as the required design for self-
reported race and ethnicity information
collections. Employing a new combined
question design may take significant
time and resources for some surveys and
information collections to implement.

Flexibilities should be allowed for
agencies dependent on aggregate data,
data that are not self-reported, or data
from non-Federal providers.
a. Background: Evidence suggests that
the use of separate race and ethnicity
questions confuses many respondents
who instead understand race and
ethnicity to be similar, or the same,
concepts. For example, a large and
increasing percentage of Hispanic or
Latino respondents on the decennial
census and American Community
Survey (ACS) over the past several
decades are either not reporting a race
or are selecting Some Other Race (SOR);
this is after responding to the ethnicity
question, which SPD 15 requires to be
collected first and separately. Decennial
census and ACS research found that a
combined race and ethnicity question
reduces confusion and reduces SOR
reporting by Hispanic or Latino
respondents. However, less is known
about the comparisons of separate
questions versus combined question
approaches for information collections
without a SOR response option.
b. OMB Requests Public Comment On:
1a. Please provide links or references
to relevant studies that examine or test
any impacts of collecting race and
ethnicity information using separate
questions compared to a combined
question.
1b. To what extent would a combined
race and ethnicity question that allows
for the selection of one or more
categories impact people’s ability to
self-report all aspects of their identity?
1c. If a combined race and ethnicity
question is implemented, what
suggestions do you have for addressing
challenges for data collection,
processing, analysis, and reporting of
data?
1d. What other challenges should we
be aware of that respondents or agencies
might face in converting their surveys
and forms to a one question format from
the current two-question format?

2. Add ‘‘Middle Eastern or North
African’’ (MENA) as a new minimum
category. The working Group proposes
that ‘‘Middle Eastern or North African’’
be added to SPD 15 as a new minimum
reporting category distinct from all other
reporting categories. The definition of
the current ‘‘White’’ reporting category
would be edited to remove MENA from
its definition.
a. Background: Currently in SPD 15,
the ‘‘White’’ minimum category
specifically includes in its definition
those having origins in any of the
original peoples of the Middle East or
North Africa. Research suggests that
many MENA respondents view their
identity as distinct from White, and
stakeholders have, for over 30 years,
advocated for collecting MENA
information separate from White.

The Working Group developed the
following draft definition of a MENA
minimum category to be inclusive of
both Middle Eastern and North African
populations and with the rationale of
listing larger population groups in the
U.S.: The category ‘‘Middle Eastern or
North African’’ includes all individuals
who identify with one or more
nationalities or ethnic groups with
origins in the Middle East and North
Africa. Examples include, but are not
limited to, Lebanese, Iranian, Egyptian,
Syrian, Moroccan, and Israeli.
b. OMB Requests Public Comment On:
2a. Given the particular context of
answering questionnaires in the U.S.
(e.g., decennial census, Federal surveys,
public benefit forms), is the term
‘‘Middle Eastern or North African
(MENA)’’ likely to continue to be
understood and accepted by those in
this community? Further, would the
term be consistently understood and
acceptable among those with different
experiences, i.e., those born in the U.S.,
those who immigrated but have lived for
an extensive period of time in the U.S.,
and those who have more recently
immigrated to the U.S.?
2b. Do these proposed nationality and
ethnic group examples adequately
represent the MENA category? If not,
what characteristics or group examples
would make the definition more
representative?
2c. Would this proposed definition
allow the generation of statistics
necessary to track the experience and
wellbeing of the MENA population?
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 182 of 224

5380 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices

3. Require the collection of detailed
race and ethnicity categories by default.

The Working Group proposes that SPD
15 require data collection on race and
ethnicity at the detailed category levels,
as specified by the example in Figure 2,
unless an agency determines that the
potential benefit of the detailed data
would not justify the additional burden
to the agency and the public or the
additional risk to privacy or
confidentiality. In those cases, agencies
must at least use the SPD 15’s minimum
categories, as specified by the example
in Figure 3. In any circumstance,
agencies are encouraged to collect and
provide more granular data than the
minimum categories.

The example design in Figure 2
represents one of potentially several
options for establishing a consistent
approach to collecting more detailed
data, with the minimum categories
disaggregated by country of origin. This
example was chosen by the Working
Group because it reflects the approach
that performed best of the options tested
by the Census Bureau prior to the 2020
Census. The country of origin options
reflect the most common countries of
origin in the U.S. for each minimum
category. This example includes
enhancements that reflect other
Working Group initial proposals (e.g.,
the category ‘‘Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander’’ removes the word
‘‘Other’’). Refer to page 30 of 2020
Research and Testing: 2017 Census Test
Report—Tribal Enrollment: https://
www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/
decennial/2020/program-management/
census-tests/2017/2017-census-test-
report_tribal-enrollment.pdf.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 183 of 224

5381 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1 EN27JA23.023</GPH>
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Figure 2. Proposed Example for Self-Response Data Collections: Combined Question with Minimum and Detailed Categories
What is your race or ethnicity?
Select all that apply AND enter additional details in the spates below.

Note, you may report more than one group.
0 WHITE- Provide details below.
□ German
□ Italian
□ Irish
□ Polish
□ English
□ French
Enter, for example, Scottish, Norwegian, Dutch, etc.
0 HISPANIC OR LATINO- Provide details below.

Mexican or
□ Mexican American D Puerto Rican □ Cuban
□ Salvadoran □ Dominican □ Colombian
Enter, for example, Guatemalan, Spaniard, Ecuadorian, etc; 0 BlACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN - Provid
□ African American □ Jamaican
D Nigerian D Ethiopian
Enter, for example, Ghanaian, Sou
□ ASIAN - Provide details below.
□ Chinese
□ Vietnamese
Enter, for example, Pakist
□ Asian Indian
□ Japanese
Navajo Nation, Bia
Barrow Jnupiat Trib
TIVE - Enter, for example,
yon, Aztec, Native Village of
nt, Tlingit, etc.

AFRICAN - Provide details below.
□ Lebanese □ Iranian □ Egyptian
□ Syrian D Moroccan □ Israeli
Enter, for example, Algerian, Iraqi, Kurdish, etc.
0 NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR PAQFIC ISLANDER - Provide details below. □ Native Hawaiian □ Samoan D Chamorro
□ Tongan □ Fijian D Marshallese
Enter,forexample, Palauan, Tahitian, Chuukese, etc.
184 of 224

5382 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices The example design in Figure 3
represents the Working Group’s
proposed minimum categories, for use
when more detailed collection is not
feasible or justified. It incorporates other
proposals from the Working Group to
use a combined race and ethnicity
question and to add a new minimum
category for MENA.
a. Background: The minimum
categories in SPD 15 contain
heterogeneity, as evidenced by
differences in a wide variety of
outcomes for distinct groups within
their definitions. The increasing
demand for analysis that represents the
diversity of the American public
increases the need for race and ethnicity
information disaggregated beyond—or
more granular than—SPD 15’s minimum
categories. The collection of
disaggregated information already
occurs in many circumstances; for
example, some current information
collections use detailed checkboxes
and/or write-in fields to collect detailed
race and ethnicity data. Figure 2 shows
an example approach for collecting
more detail beyond the minimum
categories.

However, collecting data using only
the minimum categories may be
necessary when, for example, low
response rates among population groups
of interest lead to non-representative
data, small sample sizes make estimates
about disaggregated groups statistically
unreliable, data is collected by proxy, or
small cell sizes in data analyses and
publications create privacy and
confidentiality risks.
b. OMB Requests Public Comment On:
3a. Is the example design seen in
Figure 2 inclusive such that all
individuals are represented?
3b. The example design seen in Figure
2 collects additional detail primarily by
country of origin. What other potential
types of detail would create useful data
or help respondents to identify
themselves?
3c. Some Federal information
collections are able to use open-ended
write-in fields to collect detailed racial
and ethnic responses, while some
collections must use a residual closed-
ended category (e.g., ‘‘Another Asian
Group’’). What are the impacts of using
a closed-ended category without
collecting further detail through open-
ended written responses?
3d. What should agencies consider
when weighing the benefits and burdens
of collecting or providing more granular
data than the minimum categories?
3e. Is it appropriate for agencies to
collect detailed data even though those
data may not be published or may
require combining multiple years of
data due to small sample sizes?
3f. What guidance should be included
in SPD 15 or elsewhere to help agencies
identify different collection and
tabulation options for more
disaggregated data than the minimum
categories? Should the standards
establish a preferred approach to
collecting additional detail within the
minimum categories, or encourage
agencies to collect additional
information while granting flexibility as
to the kind of information and level of
detail?
3g. Is the current ‘‘default’’ structure
of the recommendation appropriate?
Should SPD–15 pursue a more
voluntary approach to the collection of
disaggregated data, as opposed to having
a default of collecting such data unless
certain conditions are met?
3h. What techniques are
recommended for collecting or
providing detailed race and ethnicity
data for categories with smaller
population sizes within the U.S.?

4. Update Terminology in SPD 15.

The working Group proposes that SPD
15 make the following changes in
regards to terminology:

Terminologies Used Within Minimum
Categories
• The Working Group proposes that
SPD 15 remove:
—‘‘Negro’’ from the Black or African
American definition
—‘‘Far East’’ from the Asian definition,
replacing with ‘‘East Asian’’
—‘‘Other’’ from ‘‘Native Hawaiian and
Other Pacific Islander’’
—The phrase ‘‘who maintain tribal
affiliation or community attachment’’
in the American Indian or Alaska
Native definition, making this
minimum category’s definition
consistent with all minimum
categories
• The Working Group proposes that
SPD 15 correct ‘‘Cuban’’ being listed
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1 EN27JA23.024</GPH>
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Figure 3. Proposed Example for Self-Response Data Collections: Combined Question with Minimum Categories
What is your race or ethnicity?
Select all that apply.
□ White
D Hispanic or La
□ BlatkorAfrit
□ Asian
□ America···
□ Middle
orAlaska Native
or North Afritari
D Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
185 of 224

5383 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices 16 https://www.reginfo.gov/public/reginfo/pra.pdf.
17 A similar question specifically related to
Middle Eastern or North African is discussed earlier
in Section C.
18 An initial proposal of the Working Group,
discussed earlier in Section C, is to remove ‘‘Other’’
from ‘‘Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.’’
twice in the minimum category
definition for ‘‘Hispanic or Latino.’’
• The Working Group proposes that
the American Indian or Alaska Native
minimum category description be
changed to: ‘‘The category ‘American
Indian or Alaska Native’ includes all
individuals who identify with any of the
original peoples of North, Central, and
South America.’’
‘‘Majority/Minority’’
• The Working Group proposes that
SPD 15 discontinue use of the terms
‘‘majority’’ and ‘‘minority.’’
Question Stem and Instructions
• The Working Group proposes that if
a combined race and ethnicity question
is adopted, the question stem use ‘‘race’’
and ‘‘ethnicity’’ as part of the question,
i.e., ‘‘What is < your/name’s > race or
ethnicity?’’
• The Working Group proposes that
the current instructions of ‘‘Mark < X >
one or more’’ and ‘‘Select < X > one or
more’’ be updated to ‘‘Mark all that
apply’’ and ‘‘Select all that apply.’’
a. Background: The terminology used
in SPD 15 should seek to ensure that all
people are able to identify themselves
within one or more of the minimum
categories, that the minimum and
detailed categories reflect meaningful
and easy to understand distinctions, and
that the language used is respectful of
how people refer to themselves. In the
current SPD 15 the minimum category
definitions are internally inconsistent in
their descriptions, and in some places
use outdated or unclear terminology.

Recent research shows inconsistent
understanding and use of the terms
‘‘majority’’ and ‘‘minority,’’ and that the
terms may be perceived by some as
pejorative and not inclusive. Decennial
census and ACS research suggests that
some respondents are confused by the
distinction between the terms ‘‘race,’’
‘‘ethnicity,’’ and ‘‘origin’’ used in
question stems. The research also
suggests that some respondents stop
reading the instructions ‘‘mark one or
more’’ after the word ‘‘one.’’
b. OMB Requests Public Comment On:
4a. What term (such as
‘‘transnational’’) should be used to
describe people who identify with
groups that cross national borders (e.g.,
‘‘Bantu,’’ ‘‘Hmong,’’ or ‘‘Roma’’)?

1. If a combined race and ethnicity
question is implemented, what term
should be used for respondents who
select more than one category? For
example, is the preferred term
‘‘multiracial,’’ ‘‘multiethnic,’’ or
something else?

2. Please refer to Section D, Previously
Tested Definitions of Minimum
Categories. Are these draft definitions:
i. Comprehensive in coverage of all
racial and ethnic identities within the
U.S.?
ii. Using equivalent criteria?
iii. Reflective of meaningful
distinctions?
iv. Easy to understand?
v. Respectful of how people refer to
themselves?
Please suggest any alternative
language that you feel would improve
the definitions.
4b. As seen in Figure 2, based on the
Working Group’s initial proposal, the
question stem asks ‘‘What is your race
or ethnicity?’’ Do you prefer a different
question stem such as: ‘‘What is your
race and/or ethnicity?’’, ‘‘What is your
race/ethnicity?’’, ‘‘How do you
identify?’’, etc.? If so, please explain.

5. Guidance is necessary to
implement SPD 15 revisions on Federal
information collections. The Working
Group proposes that SPD 15 and its
related documents be placed online in
a central location and include
implementation guidance on:
• The dates agencies must meet as
they incorporate revisions to
information collections,
• Statistical methods to connect data
produced from previous and revised
collection formats (e.g., bridging
between data collected via two
questions without MENA and data
collected via one question with MENA),
• Procedures for collecting,
processing, and reporting detailed racial
and ethnic categories,
• Approaches for collecting race and
ethnicity information when self-
identification is not possible, i.e., data
collected by a proxy or observation and/
or by entities outside of SPD 15’s
purview (e.g., State or local
governments, hospitals, or schools),
• Approaches for reporting data for
respondents who select more than one
race or ethnicity. Specifically, guidance
is needed on how to balance providing
detailed information, for example by
including all possible combinations of
multiple responses, and providing a
single category when needed (e.g.,
‘‘multiracial’’),
• Guidance on obtaining approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
16 to revise existing race and ethnicity data
collections, and
• Best practices for agencies to rely
on when communicating SPD 15
revisions to stakeholders.
a. Background: It is a large
undertaking for agencies to implement
changes to censuses, surveys, and
administrative forms that collect race
and ethnicity data. Agencies need
guidance to implement any potential
SPD 15 revisions like those included in
the Working Group’s initial proposals.
b. OMB Requests Public Comment On:
5a. For data providers who collect
race and ethnicity data that is then sent
to a Federal agency, are there additional
guidance needs that have not been
addressed in the initial proposals?
5b. With the proposals to use a
combined race and ethnicity question
and to add MENA as a minimum
category, what specific bridging
concerns do Federal data users have?
Please submit any research on bridging
techniques that may be helpful to the
Working Group. Bridging refers to
making data collected using one set of
categories (e.g., two questions without
MENA), consistent with data collected
using a different set of categories (e.g.,
one question with MENA).
5c. What guidance on bridging should
be provided for agencies to implement
potential revisions to SPD 15?
5d. How should race and ethnicity be
collected when some method other than
respondent self-identification is
necessary (e.g., by proxy or
observation)?
5e. What guidance should be
provided for the collection and
reporting of race and ethnicity data in
situations where self-identification is
unavailable?

6. Comments On Any Additional
Topics and Future Research.
6a. SPD 15 does not dictate the order
in which the minimum categories
should be displayed on Federal
information collections. Agencies
generally order alphabetically or by
population size; however, both
approaches have received criticism.

What order, alphabetical or by
population size, do you prefer and why?
Or what alternative approach would you
recommend?
6b. The current
17 minimum
categories are termed:
• American Indian or Alaska Native
• Asian
• Black or African American
• Hispanic or Latino
• Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander 18
• White
Do you have suggestions for different
terms for any of these categories?
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 186 of 224

5384 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2023 / Notices 6c. How can Federal surveys or forms
collect data related to descent from
enslaved peoples originally from the
African continent? For example, when
collecting and coding responses, what
term best describes this population
group (e.g., is the preferred term
‘‘American Descendants of Slavery,’’
‘‘American Freedmen,’’ or something
else)? How should this group be
defined? Should it be collected as a
detailed group within the ‘‘Black or
African American’’ minimum category,
or through a separate question or other
approach?
6d. The proposals in this FRN
represent the Working Group’s initial
suggestions for revisions to SPD 15 to
improve the accuracy and usefulness of
Federal race and ethnicity data. The
Working Group and OMB welcome
comments and suggestions on any other
ways that SPD 15 could be revised to
produce more accurate and useful race
and ethnicity data.

D. Previously Tested Definitions of
Minimum Categories
• American Indian or Alaska Native:

The category ‘‘American Indian or
Alaska Native’’ includes all individuals
who identify with any of the original
peoples of North, Central, and South
America. It includes people who
identify as ‘‘American Indian’’ or
‘‘Alaska Native’’ and includes groups
such as Navajo Nation, Blackfeet Tribe,
Mayan, Aztec, Native Village of Barrow
Inupiat Traditional Government, Tlingit,
etc.
• Asian: The category ‘‘Asian’’
includes all individuals who identify
with one or more nationalities or ethnic
groups originating in East Asia,
Southeast Asia, or the Indian
subcontinent. Examples of these groups
include, but are not limited to, Chinese,
Filipino, Asian Indian, Vietnamese,
Korean, and Japanese. The category also
includes groups such as Pakistani,
Cambodian, Hmong, Thai, Bengali,
Mien, etc.
• Black or African American: The
category ‘‘Black or African American’’
includes all individuals who identify
with one or more nationalities or ethnic
groups originating in any of the Black
racial groups of Africa. Examples of
these groups include, but are not limited
to, African American, Jamaican, Haitian,
Nigerian, Ethiopian, and Somali. The
category also includes groups such as
Ghanaian, South African, Barbadian,
Kenyan, Liberian, Bahamian, etc.
• Hispanic or Latino: The category
‘‘Hispanic or Latino’’ includes all
individuals who identify with one or
more nationalities or ethnic groups
originating in Mexico, Puerto Rico,
Cuba, Central and South American, and
other Spanish cultures. Examples of
these groups include, but are not limited
to, Mexican or Mexican American,
Puerto Rican, Cuban, Salvadoran,
Dominican, and Colombian. The
category also includes groups such as
Guatemalan, Honduran, Spaniard,
Ecuadorian, Peruvian, Venezuelan, etc.
• Middle Eastern or North African:

The category ‘‘Middle Eastern or North
African’’ includes all individuals who
identify with one or more nationalities
or ethnic groups originating in the
Middle East or North Africa. Examples
of these groups include, but are not
limited to, Lebanese, Iranian, Egyptian,
Syrian, Moroccan, and Israeli. The
category also includes groups such as
Algerian, Iraqi, Kurdish, Tunisian,
Chaldean, Assyrian, etc.
• Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander:

The category ‘‘Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander’’ includes all
individuals who identify with one or
more nationalities or ethnic groups
originating in Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or
other Pacific Islands. Examples of these
groups include, but are not limited to,
Native Hawaiian, Samoan, Chamorro,
Tongan, Fijian, and Marshallese. The
category also includes groups such as
Palauan, Tahitian, Chuukese,
Pohnpeian, Saipanese, Yapese, etc.
• White: The category ‘‘White’’
includes all individualswho identify
with one or more nationalities or ethnic
groups originating in Europe. Examples
of these groups include, but are not
limited to, German, Irish, English,
Italian, Polish, and French. The category
also includes groups such as Scottish,
Norwegian, Dutch, Slavic, Cajun, Roma,
etc.

E. Conclusion
This Notice is a request for the public
to comment on the initial proposals of
the Working Group. None of the initial
proposals have been adopted, and no
interim decisions have been made
concerning them. OMB can modify or
reject any of the proposals, and OMB
has the option of making no changes.

The initial proposals are published in
this Notice because OMB believes that
they are worthy of public discussion
and that OMB and the Working Group’s
further and continuing deliberations
will benefit from obtaining the public’s
views on the proposals. OMB plans to
complete revisions to SPD 15 no later
than Summer 2024.

Richard L. Revesz,
Administrator, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023–01635 Filed 1–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION

ADMINISTRATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA) will submit the
following information collection
requests to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
clearance in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or
after the date of publication of this
notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on
or before February 27, 2023 to be
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :

Copies of the submission may be
obtained by contacting Sherie McArthur
at (703) 518–6607, emailing
[email protected], or viewing
the entire information collection request
at www.reginfo.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Number: 3133–0098.

Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.

Title: Advertising of Excess Insurance.
12 CFR part 740.3.

Abstract: Federally insured credit
unions which offer or provide excess
insurance coverage for their accounts
must indicate the type and amount of
such insurance, the name of the carrier
and a statement that the carrier is not
affiliated with the NCUSIF or the
Federal government in all advertising
that mentions account insurance. The
disclosure requirements under § 740.3
are necessary to ensure that share
account holders are aware that their
accounts are insured by carriers other
than the NCUA.

Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 291.

OMB Number: 3133–0130.

Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.

Title: Written Reimbursement Policy,
12 CFR part 701.33.

Abstract: Federal Credit Unions
(FCUs) may reimburse its board
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Jan 26, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM 27JAN1khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 187 of 224

Page 1 of 11 ends

Glendale City CouncilMarch 21, 2023

Glendale City Council
March 21, 2023