Agenda packet — Glendale City Council, April 11, 2023 (part 1 of 3)

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings are broadcast live on Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T Uverse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed live in high definition (HD) on the city's webpage, glendaleca.gov/live, on YouTube.com/myglendale, and on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire devices usinga free app called Screenweave and choosing “Glendale TV” from the menu. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at glendaleca.gov/agendas. Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. DVDs of the proceedings are available for purchase in the City Clerk's Office. For public comments and questions during the meeting, call (818) 937-8100. Public comments ona specific agenda item will be taken when that agenda item is discussed. If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E.

Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at (818) 548-2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Please specify the language for which you require translation. The exclusive use of City provided interpreters is not required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.

APRIL 11, 2023

ROLL CALL

1. CLOSED SESSION – 1:00 PM (To Commence at 3:00 PM)
a. Conference with Labor Negotiators. The City-designated negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Gillian van Muyden, Jason Bradford, Paula Adams, Aymee Martin, Mark Young and Peter Brown. The name of the employee organization is I.B.E.W., Local 18, Unit 40 1 TYPED 4/11/2023 4:27:39 PM
04 11 23
CC

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a. Flag Salute: Boy Scout Troop 390
b. Invocation: Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 11, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on Thursday, April 6, 2023 on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, April 18, 2023 b. Proclamation Designating April 10, 2023 to April 16, 2023 as Food Waste Prevention Week
c. Appointment of Edwin Belen to the Audit Committee (Najarian, 04/04/2023) d. Appointment of Zareh Amirian to the Transportation and Parking Commission (Najarian, 04/04/2023)
e. Reappointment of Zaven Hanessian to the Building and Fire Board of Appeals Commission (Najarian, 04/04/2023)
f. Reappointment of Ronnie Gharibian to the Community Development Block Grant Commission (Najarian, 04/04/2023)

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Regular City Council, Housing Authority and Joint City Council and Housing Authority meetings of April 4, 2023 b. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for Parking Citation Processing, Delinquent Collections, and Parking Permit Services

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement for a duration of five years with an option to extend the contract for one two-year term with Professional Account Management, LLC to provide parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and parking permit services in the amount of $1,400,000
c. Public Works, re: Roofing Replacements and Restoration at Various City Facilities

1. Resolution adopting Specification No. 3908 for the Roofing Replacement and Restoration at Various City Facilities and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids

2. Resolution of Appropriation transferring $65,000 from Building Maintenance Fund Net Position account to the Fire Station 28 Roof Renovation project account to provide adequate funding for this project
d. Public Works, re: Flooring Installation at Various City Facilities

1. Resolution adopting Specification No. 3943 for flooring installation at various City facilities and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids e. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project
2 TYPED 4/11/2023 4:27:39 PM
04 11 23
CC

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Infrastructure Engineers to provide Professional Engineering Services for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $408,344, plus a 10 percent contingency of $40,800 f. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with NV5, Inc. to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $368,500, plus a 10 percent contingency of $36,850
g. Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement for Professional Engineering Services for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $587,075, plus a 10 percent contingency of $58,700

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS

9. HEARINGS
a. Community Development, re: Public Hearing Regarding Request for Approval of a Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, Inclusive of Discretionary Density Bonus, pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law, to construct a new 43-unit residential housing development project, providing a total of eight affordable units reserved for Very Low Income Households (Density Bonus Housing Plan Case No.

PDBP2212648) on property addresses 424, 430, and 434 West Milford Street

1. Motion to approve Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of discretionary density bonus

2. Motion to deny Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of discretionary density bonus
b. Community Development, re: Public Hearing on Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission’s denial of Design Review Case No. PDR-000838-2023 located at 1642 South Central Avenue and 1608 Gardena Avenue

1. Resolution certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the proposed Project, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) due to significant and unavoidable project impacts from (i) the demolition of the existing historic house at 1642 S. Central Avenue, and (ii) construction generated noise and vibration impacts and making findings in support thereof; and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
3 TYPED 4/11/2023 4:27:39 PM
04 11 23
CC

2. Motion approving the Project Design Review Application (DR Case No. PDR2017612) as proposed

3. Motion approving the Project Design Review Application (DR Case No. PDR2017612) with conditions

4. Motion to sustain the Historic Preservation Commission’s decision to not certify the FEIR and deny the Project Design Review Application

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes.

Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision.

The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

13. NEW BUSINESS

14. ADJOURNMENT
4 TYPED 4/11/2023 4:27:39 PM
04 11 23
CC
5 of 638
6 of 638
7 of 638
8 of 638
9 of 638
10 of 638
1 4A

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
APRIL 4, 2023
ROLL CALL – Absent: Najarian

1. CLOSED SESSION – 3:26 p.m.
a. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation: Significant exposure litigation pursuant to paragraph subdivisions (d)(2) and (e)(2) of Section 54956.9: One (1) potential case
b. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: Karapetian v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 19STCV17066
c. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One (1) potential case
d. Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Manager and City Attorney e. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation: Aghazarian v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 19STCV45225
Public Comment:

Herbert Molano
City Attorney Mike Garcia indicated that action not anticipated. Council recessed to closed session at 3:30 p.m.

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Ardy Kassakhian
b. Invocation: Poet Laurete Raffi Joe Wartanian
c. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 4, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on Thursday, March 30, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, April 11, 2023 Assistant City Manager John Takhtalian provided the preview. b. Outgoing Mayor’s Comments
Mayor Kassakhian thanked the residents of the Glendale, city staff and all the commissioners who have worked tirelessly to make his year as a mayor a productive one.

He also thanked his critics who have twitted or sent emails. He gave special thanks to his friends and advisors Dveen Babaian and Sevana Zadourian. He also thanked his family for their support. He congratulated Dan Brotman for his upcoming mayorship and stated that he will be a great Mayor for the city and will continue the great work that the Council has begun this year.
11 of 638
2 Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
c. Selection of a New Mayor
Mayor Kassakhian nominated Council Member Brotman for Mayor. Hearing no further nominations, City Clerk Suzie Abajian proceeded with the Roll Call.

Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Devine
City Clerk Suzie Abajian declared Council Member Brotman the duly elected Mayor of the City of Glendale.
d. New Mayor’s Comments
Newly Appointed Mayor Dan Brotman thanked voters of the Glendale for believing in him twice: once in 2020 and again in 2022. He thanks his colleagues and some of the dignitaries who were present including Senator Anthony Portantino, former Mayor Frank Quintero, Laura Friedman’s field representative and city commissioners. He also thanked his parents Bob and Joyce, his partner Michelle, and his children. He acknowledged outgoing Mayor, Ardy Kassakhian’s dedication to and genuine love for the city in which he was raised. Mayor Brotman also thanked his colleagues and staff. He spoke about his move to the City of Glendale, how he became politically active and his journey of becoming a councilmember and now a mayor. He stated that Glendale is thriving; tax revenues are strong; the city is still ranked as one of the safest cities of its size in the country and that it was recently ranked as one of the happiest cities. He reviewed the accomplishments of the council from last year including some of the large, long delayed and politicly fraught projects such as the repowering of Grayson and the Scholl Canyon landfill. He stated that Glendale is a great City with quality services, relative safety, healthy economy, award winning schools, stunning natural environment, all within the distance of the second largest city in the United States. Most importantly, he recognized the diverse and highly talented population. He mentioned some of the challenges that the city is facing including deep inequity in housing and transportation, the effects of a rapidly changing climate and budgeting challenges including less funding and rising pension obligations. He stated that the city will have to make tough decisions such as cut services, renegotiate with the bargaining units, or find new revenues. Mayor Brotman laid out his priorities for the coming year including increase the housing inventory, making the streets safer for people on foot or bike and ramping up the production of solar energy and electrification of buildings. He also proposed an education campaign to reduce food waste and ensure that the organic waste gets to compost facilities and not the landfill. He also mentioned the need for expanding the urban forest, advancing policies for cool roofs and roads, improving water capture, and enhancing efforts to build CERT teams in vulnerable neighborhoods. Mayor Brotman also discussed plans for ensuring the fiscal health of the city. In closing he thanked his family and the Glendale Environmental coalition for their invaluable advocacy and work.

Public Comments:

Senator Anthony Portantino
Christopher Khachatoor from the office of Assembly Member Laura Friedman e. Identification of Nominating Panel for Civil Service Commission Appointment to Reappoint/Replace Mark MacCarley - Asatryan/Brotman f. Identification of Nominating Panel for the Civil Service Commission Appointment to Fill Vacancy Created by Resignation of Albert Abkarian - 12 of 638
3 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Brotman/Devine
g. Identification of Nominating Panel for the Civil Service Commission Appointment to Fill Vacancy Created by Resignation of Greg Astorian – Devine/Kassakhian

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Joint City Council and Supervisor Kathryn Barger, Joint City Council and Housing Authority, and Regular City Council Meetings of March 28, 2023
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian
b. Public Works, re: Brand Park Motorway Improvements Project

1. Motion awarding a construction contract to Access Limited Construction, in the amount of $1,096,192, approving a 15 percent contract contingency in the amount of $164,430, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the contract
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian

2. Resolution 23-37 of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $1,370,222 for the Brand Park Motorway Improvements Project Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian
c. Community Services and Parks, re: Amendment Nine for FY 22-23 Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department (AD) Revised Federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Nutrition Infrastructure funding allocation of $245,980 for Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) services

1. Motion to reprogram unused FY 2022-2023 Federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Congregate Meals Services (C1) funding in the amount of $100,000 to Home Delivered Meals Services (C2) and accept $245,980 in FY2022-2023 Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Nutrition Infrastructure (NI) funding for the purchase of approved equipment/fleet to be used for the provision of Elderly Nutrition Program from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department for; and authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment Nine to the County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department Contract Subaward Number ENP202106 Subaward period July 2020 – June 2023 to accept and implement Los Angeles County AD funding
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian
13 of 638
4 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

2. Resolution 23-38 of Appropriation to reprogram FY 2022-2023 unused ARPA C1 congregate meals funds in the amount of $100,000 to ARPA C2 home delivered meals and to appropriate $245,980 in HCBS Nutrition Infrastructure funding for FY 2022-2023 for the purchase of equipment/fleet for the ENP Program Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian
d. Public Works, re: Contract Award for the Glendale Transportation Center Renovation Project

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a contract with ARC Construction, Inc., for the Glendale Transportation Center Renovation Project, per Specification No. 3926, in the amount of $1,306,350, plus a 10% contingency $130,635
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
Councilmember Asatryan thanked former Mayor Kasskahian for his work and dedication and congratulated Mayor Brotman. Councilmember Asatryan attended the Tzakhgazart event at Verdugo Park which included many fun activities for families.

Councilmember Devine thanked former Mayor Kassakhian and congratulated Mayor Brotman. Councilmember Devine also thanked Director Bulanikian and his staff Zaven at Pacific community park for the successful Extravaganza event. She also complimented the Soroptimist International of Glendale for their 20th annual “Bras for Cause” event.

Councilmember Devine reminded residents of Glendale to vote for their choice of the new redesign for the Burbank Airport.

Councilmember Najarian congratulated outgoing Mayor Kassakhian for his work and congratulated incoming Mayor Brotman.

Councilmember Kassakhian congratulated Mayor Brotman and wished him well.

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes)
Mike Mohill
Dr. Jane L. Mahakian-President and Founder of Alzheimer’s Care Armenia Paul Rabinov-Glendale Parks and Open Space Foundation
Herbert Molano
Damian Sulivan

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS
14 of 638
5 Asatryan, Devine, Kassakhian, Najarian, Brotman
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes. Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision. The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

Liz Radley
Karin Kachler

13. NEW BUSINESS
Per City Manager Golanian these two new business items will come back at a later date. a. Discussion of Request by Councilmember Asatryan to Agendize a Report and Discussion of Family Leave for City Employees Including Adoption, Fostering, Bonding Leave, Lactation Accommodations and Similar Categories Identified by the Human Resources Department, With a Discussion of Fiscal Impacts

1. Motion to Agendize the Item
b. Discussion of Request by Councilmember Asatryan to Agendize a Report and Discussion of a Menstrual Leave Policy for Employees, to Include a Discussion of Fiscal Impacts, Different Models to Address Leave Days, Hybrid Leave Days/Remote Work, and Remote Work Only Alternatives, Phasing Alternatives, Wellness Programs and Analyses of Programs Offered by Other Employers

1. Motion to Agendize the Item
c. City attorney is authorized to initiate a legal action in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Names of defendants and other particulars shall be disclosable upon the filing and service of said action on the defendants, and the City Attorney is authorized to incur any and all expenses in connection with said matter.

Moved: Najarian Seconded: Kassakhian
15 of 638
6 14. ADJOURNMENT- 7:37 p.m.

Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Devine
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
16 of 638
1 4A

A G E N D A

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
APRIL 4, 2023, AT 3:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL

2. CLOSED SESSION

3. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 3:02 p.m.
a. Roll Call – All Present
b. Report of City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 4, 2023 Regular Meeting of the Glendale Housing Authority was Posted on Thursday, March 30, 2023, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Minutes of the Regular Housing Authority Meeting of March 21, 2023 Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian
Minutes approved as submitted

5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 Minutes. Members of the Housing Authority may Question or Respond to the Speaker, but there will be no Debate or Decision. The Matter may be Referred to Staff Through the Executive Director for Investigation and Report.

6. BUSINESS AGENDA

7. AUTHORITY MEMBER/STAFF COMMENTS

8. NEW BUSINESS

9. ADJOURNMENT – 3:03 p.m.

Moved: Devine Seconded: Kassakhian
Chair of the Housing Authority Clerk of the Housing Authority 17 of 638
1 4A

M I N U T E S
JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

AND GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206
APRIL 4, 2023
The Joint Meeting of the Glendale City Council and Glendale Housing Authority convened in the City Hall Council Chambers, in said City, at 3:04 p.m. on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

March 30, 2023
Date
A JOINT PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council and Housing Authority is hereby called to meet at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, April 4, 2023, in the Council Chamber, 613 E.

Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Services and Parks, re: Reprogramming of various Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) City Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funds from various program years to avoid returning unspent federal U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds back to U.S. Treasury
a. City Council Motion to reprogram returned funding from City and Community Agency CIP projects totaling $1,812,321.83 from various program years
b. City Council Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018- 2019, 2019-2020, 2021-2022, 2022-2023; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval c. Housing Authority Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019,2019- 2020, 2021-2022, 2022-2023; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval d. City Council Resolution of Appropriation to reprogram Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) City Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funds from various program years
18 of 638
2 Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Robert Adjinian at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Paula Devine at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Laura Parazian at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 p.m. March 30, 2023 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m.

ROLL CALL
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, April 4, 2023 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on Thursday, March 30, 2023, on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall.

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Kassakhian passed the gavel to Mayor Pro-Tem Brotman and recused himself due to a possible conflict of interest and returned thereafter.
a. City Council Motion to reprogram returned funding from City and Community Agency CIP projects totaling $1,812,321.83 from various program years
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows
b. City Council Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2021-2022, 2022-2023; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and authorize the City Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine
None
Najarian
Kassakhian (recused)
19 of 638
3 Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval
Moved: Devine Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows
c. Housing Authority Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2016-2017, 2017- 2018, 2018-2019,2019- 2020, 2021-2022, 2022-2023; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval
Moved: Adjinian Seconded: Devine
Vote as Follows
d. City Council Resolution 23-36 of Appropriation to reprogram Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) City Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funds from various program years
Moved: Devine Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows
ADJOURNMENT – 3:26 p.m.
- City Council
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Devine
- Housing Authority
Moved: Devine Seconded: Parazian
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine
None
Najarian
Kassakhian (recused)
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Adjinian, Asatryan, Devine, Parazian, Brotman
None
Najarian
Kassakhian (recused)
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine
None
Najarian
Kassakhian (recued)
20 of 638
4 Mayor of the City of Glendale
Chair of the Glendale Housing Authority
Clerk of the Glendale Housing Authority
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
21 of 638
4b

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement for Parking Citation Processing, Delinquent Collections, and Parking Permit Services
1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement for a duration of five years with an option to extend the contract for one two-year term with Professional Account Management, LLC to provide parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and parking permit services in the amount of $1,400,000.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for April 11, 2023 Calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A professional services agreement (PSA) is needed for a company to provide parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and parking permit services. The existing PSA is set to expire on July 1, 2023.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, the consultant team of Professional Account Management, LLC, was selected to perform this work.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Mobility/Connectivity/Safety: Parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and the preferential parking permit program services encourage parking compliance, reduce traffic congestion, and assist with overall parking management and safety. 22 of 638
2 b 4

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement for a duration of five years with an option to extend the contract for one twoyear term with Professional Account Management, LLC to provide parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and parking permit services in the amount of $1,000,000 over five years with an optional two-year extension for an additional $400,000.

BACKGROUND
The Glendale Police Department and SP Plus Inc., the city’s parking enforcement contractor, issue approximately 100,000 parking citations annually. These records are uploaded into a system hosted by our current contractor, Professional Account Management, LLC, who obtains the registered vehicle owner (RO) information through the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), out of state DMVs, skip-tracing and third-party providers. Once RO information is obtained, notices are sent by mail to the violator for payment. Violators have the option to contest the citation, which can be done online or by mail. If the citation is deemed valid upon review, payments are received by mail and/or through the online payment portal. Professional Account Management, LLC processes low-income payment plans and monthly installment payment plans to assist debtors in paying outstanding accounts based on California Vehicle Code (CVC) 40220 and city requirements.

Professional Account Management, LLC pursues delinquent collections on the outstanding debt if payment is not received based on federal, state and city guidelines.

Delinquent collections include DMV registration holds and the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Tax Intercept Program. During vehicle registration, if the RO has any outstanding debt, this debt will have to be settled before the vehicle can be registered. If the citation has been rejected by the DMV, outstanding debt will be deducted from the RO if they qualify for a California State tax refund, have California lottery winnings, or own unclaimed property. Professional Account Management, LLC may pursue legal action if directed by the city on specific outstanding debt.

The City of Glendale established the preferential parking program in 1980 to assist residents in alleviating parking congestion in residential neighborhoods caused by nonresidential vehicles. Permits issued under this program allow residents to park past the posted time restriction, preventing long term non-resident parkers from parking on these residential streets while providing on-street parking for residents. Approximately 3,500 residential parking permits are issued each year. To receive a parking permit, residents must complete an application and provide documentation of residency and vehicle information either by mail or submit this information via Professional Account Management, LLC’s hosted website. Once this information is received by Professional Account Management, LLC, and documentation is verified and payment received, parking permits are then fulfilled and mailed to the residents. 23 of 638
3 b 4

ANALYSIS
An RFP was issued on November 7, 2022, for professional services for this program.

On December 21, 2022, the city received five proposals from consulting teams under RFP #2022-205.

An evaluation team of staff from Public Works and the Police Department reviewed the proposals. The proposals were all ranked based on system and product capabilities, company experience and staffing, cost proposal, integrations and flexibility, and references. All the proposers for each project were then interviewed, and on February 9, 2023, all five companies demonstrated their parking citation processing, delinquent collection, and parking permit services proposals and answered questions regarding their proposed solutions.

Based on the combination of the evaluation of written submittals and the results of the interviews, the evaluation team determined Professional Account Management, LLC to be the top ranked firm for parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and parking permit services.

Professional Account Management, LLC has been providing the city with excellent customer service and staff support, product design, audit reports, and hardware and software options since 2014. Throughout the course of their current contract, Professional Account Management, LLC has developed a parking citation and permit parking website to assist residents with citation payment options and permits, increased collection output, and created custom reports and letters requested by staff to meet the City of Glendale’s needs.

Professional Account Management has more than 35 years of experience helping government agencies of all sizes deliver parking management solutions. Their service offering includes citation issuance, processing, permit management, secondary collections, license plate lookup, and more for over 200 municipal clients nationwide.

Professional Account Management’s experience, customer service, compliance standards, and user-friendly parking management software have proven effective.

Professional Account Management provides excellent service to other California cities such as Burbank, Sacramento, and San Diego. Professional Account Management employs 700 people statewide in California with primary presence in Los Angeles and the Bay area.

The total costs for the Professional Services for parking citation processing, delinquent collections, and parking permit services is $1,000,000 over five years with an optional two-year extension for an additional $400,000.
24 of 638
4 b 4
Project Description: Parking Citation Processing, Delinquent Collection and Parking Permit Services
RFP Approved: N/A
Advertisement Method: City Website
RFP Issued: November 7, 2022
RFP Due Date: December 21, 2022
Company Name(s) Conduent Transportation
Data Ticket
Professional Account Management, LLC
IPS Group
Phoenix Information Systems Group
Selection Criteria
(If SS, list applicable
Provision):

System and Product Capabilities
Company Experience and Staffing
Cost Proposal
Integrations and Flexibility
References
Recommended
Consultant(s):

Professional Account Management, LLC
New / Existing
Consultant(s):

Existing
Procurement Method
(RFP / SS):

RFP
Contract Term: 5 Years with one-time renewal for additional 2 years Project Begins: Upon execution of contract
Project Ends: Upon the expiration date of the contract

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed professional services agreement for Parking Citation Processing, Delinquent Collection and Parking Permit Services will cost $1,000,000 over five years with an optional two-year amount of $400,000, for a potential total amount of $1,400,000. The budget for the first year of these services in the amount of $200,000 is included as part of the FY 2023-24 proposed budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. Funding for the remaining contract years will be requested as part of the city’s annual budget process. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:
25 of 638
5 b 4
Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$200,000 GL: 43110-2210-PWD-7521-P0000 Parking Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1 in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Professional Account Management, LLC for parking citation processing, delinquent collection, and parking permit services.

Alternative 2: Do not to award the professional services agreement as recommended herein. This will delay the processing and collection of outstanding citation revenue which will have an adverse impact on the parking program.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Tad Dombroski, Parking Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Disclosure Forms
26 of 638
6 b 4
27 of 638
MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____________________________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a professional services agreement – subject to approval by the City Attorney - with Professional Account Management, LLC, as described in the report to Council dated April 11, 2023, for a five-year term for $1,000,000, with the option to renew one-time for an additional period of two years for an additional $400,000.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
_________________________
City Clerk
28 of 638
EXHIBIT 1
29 of 638
30 of 638
31 of 638
4c

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Roofing Replacements and Restoration at Various City Facilities

1. Resolution adopting Specification No. 3908 for the Roofing Replacement and Restoration at Various City Facilities and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff to solicit competitive bids for new roofing systems at five facilities including approving of a resolution of appropriation to provide adequate Building Maintenance funds for the Fire Station 28 roof replacement.

The existing roofing systems at these facilities have been in service beyond their warranty period, have experienced significant leaks, and are no longer cost effective to maintain.

Three of the facilities will have the existing roof system removed and a new roofing system installed with a 20-year warranty. Two of the facilities will have the existing roofing systems reconditioned with modern restoration products with a 15-year warranty.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Infrastructure: This purpose of this project is to preserve and protect city buildings and the city assets inside for a long duration.

RECOMMENDATION
The Public Works Department recommends the City Council adopt Specification No. 3908 for the Roofing Replacements and Restoration at Various City Facilities Project and direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids. Additionally, staff asks that the City Council approve a resolution of appropriation transferring $65,000 from Building Maintenance Fund Net Position account to the Fire Station 28 Roof Renovation project account to provide adequate funding for this project.
32 of 638
2 c 4

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The recent rains of 2022 and 2023 have highlighted significant deficiencies in five roof systems at city facilities. These roofs have been in-service for many years, are beyond their rated service life, and are now in need of full replacement and/or reconditioning.

The following is a summary of location and condition of these structures:

The Fire Station 29 Apparatus Bay roof is a 3,000 square foot built-up roofing system that will be completely removed and replaced with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC), single-ply roof that will include a 20-year warranty. An adjacent roof section will utilize modern coating materials for restoration and provide a 15-year warranty.

The Adams Square Historical Gas Station at Adams Park is programmed by the Community Services and Parks Department and includes rotating art displays throughout the year. Due to original features of this 800 square foot facility, the existing roof system is very difficult to maintain and has experienced numerous leaks over the years. To properly address the chronic roof issue, it is necessary to completely remove the existing roof and install a new standing-seam metal roof. This new roof will include a 30-year warranty.

The Public Works Corporate Yard, Mechanical Maintenance Lube Bay Roof is a 2,200 square foot built-up roofing system that will be completely removed and replaced with a PVC single-ply roof that will include a 20-year warranty.

The Montrose Library Roof is a 10,500 square foot PVC single-ply roof that will be repaired and coated and will include a 15-year warranty. This work also includes the replacement of a large skylight structure.

The Fire Station 28 roof is a 7,000 square foot asphalt, built-up system that will be repaired and reconditioned and will include a 15-year warranty. Unlike the other facilities included in this project, the Fire Station 28 roof restoration is not currently budgeted as the roof deficiencies were only recently uncovered during the recent rainstorms. A resolution of appropriation is recommended to cover these costs.

All new and reconditioned roofing systems will include energy efficient materials consistent with Title 24 including reflective roof surfaces. The materials will include the maximum warranty duration possible to minimize future maintenance costs and preserve the integrity of the facilities
All work will be coordinated with each facility’s operators to minimize impacts. The anticipated construction duration for all five roofs is 60 calendar days.

Project Description: Roofing Replacement and Restoration at Various City Facilities Project
Plans/Specs Adopted: April 11, 2023
Advertisement Method: City website, press release, direct invitation 33 of 638
3 c 4
Specs Issued: April 2023
Bids Opened: May 2023
Company Name
and Bid Amount:

TBD
Recommended
Contractor(s)
TBD
New / Existing
Contractor(s):

TBD
Procurement Method
(Bid / SS):

Bid
Contract Term: 60 Working Days
Construction
Phase Begins:

June 2023
Construction
Phase Ends:

August 2023

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The Public Works Department will coordinate with the installing contractor and each location’s staff to minimize any disruptions to operations and the public.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Engineer’s Estimate for the Roofing Replacements and Restoration at Various City Facilities project is $515,000 of which, $450,000 for this project was approved as a part of the FY 2022-23 Budget. The remaining amount of $65,000 was not included as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget and therefore staff is requesting for a resolution of appropriation of $65,000 from the Building Maintenance Fund Balance. The City Council approved funding and the appropriation request is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$100,000 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00578AN
Building
Maintenance Fund
$125,000 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00589AN
Building
Maintenance Fund
$100,000 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00587AN
Building
Maintenance Fund
$125,000 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00585AN
Building
Maintenance Fund
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $65,000 GL: 27900-6070-PWDP0000
GL: 43110-6070-PWD0020-P0000Building Maintenance
Fund Balance
34 of 638
4 c 4
PL: PWD00987AN

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1. This exemption pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301 and Title 14. The Adam’s Park Gas Station project is Categorically Exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines as a Class 31 (Historical Resource Restoration/ Rehabilitation) exemption pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15331, which provides: “Class 31 consists of projects limited to maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer.”

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the Resolution adopting Specification No. 3908 for the Roofing Replacements and Restoration at Various City Facilities and direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids and approve a Resolution of Appropriation to fund the Fire Station 28 roof portion of the project.

Alternative 2: Do not approve the resolutions and the Public Works Department will continue to provide a best effort at maintaining the existing roofs.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Kevin C. Todd, Assistant Director of Public Works
Reviewed by:

Yazdan T. Emrani, Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
35 of 638
4c
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

ADOPTING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FORROOF REPLACEMENT AND RESTORATION AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES, SPECIFICATION NO. 3908 AND

DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1.The Specifications on file in the City Clerk’s office for the Roofing Replacement and Restoration at Various City Facilities including the various documents incorporated therein, are hereby approved, adopted, designated and shall hereafter be known as Specification No. 3908.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to advertise for bids for the work, equipment and materials described in this Specifications adopted by this Resolution.

Adopted this _____ day of ____________, 2023.
____________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____________ was Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _________________, 2022, the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
36 of 638
37 of 638
4d

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Flooring Installation at Various City Facilities

1. Resolution adopting Specification No. 3943 for flooring installation at various City facilities and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The existing flooring at the Police Department, Fire Station 21 and Energy Management Center facilities has been in service beyond its expected performance period, have lost their aesthetic quality, and are no longer maintainable. The proposed new flooring will be durable, attractive and include manufacture’s warranties.

Staff seeks City Council authorization to solicit competitive bids for the installations of new flooring materials at these three facilities.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Infrastructure: This project will provide responsible upkeep of public facilities and improve the aesthetic and functional qualities of each facility.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve a Resolution to adopt the project Specifications for Flooring Installation at Various City Facilities Project and direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids.
38 of 638
2 d 4

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of all city facilities including floor coverings. As part of the ongoing preventive maintenance plan, Public Works schedules the replacement of worn and outdates portions of floor coverings at various facilities where it’s warranted. These replacements occur within the overall city building portfolio of nearly 1.2 million sq. ft.

The Police Department Facility was occupied in 2005, is approximately 160,000 sq. ft., and includes a variety of different types of floor coverings. This project will remove and replace 50,000 sq. ft. of carpet that has been in-service for nearly 20-years. Given the Police Department Facility operates 2/47 and is essentially a “work-boot” operation, the 20-year life of the existing carpet is better than expected. The new carpet to be installed is a carpet tile product that is equally durable with the 20-year carpet it’s replacing. With proper maintenance, the new carpet will last the city many years and includes a limited lifetime manufacturer’s warranty.

Fire Station 21 was occupied in 1994, is approximately 50,000 sq. ft., and includes a variety of different types of floor coverings. This project will remove 35,000 sq. ft. of carpet that has been in-service for nearly 30-years and replace it with a solid-surface flooring. Given the Fire Station facility is operated 2/47 and is a “work-boot” operation, the 30-year life of the existing carpet is better than expected. The new solid-surface flooring material is rated for heavy-duty applications, will provide ease of maintenance, will last the city many years, and includes a 15 year manufacturer’s warranty.

All installations will be coordinated with each facility’s operations to minimize impacts.

The anticipated duration for this project is 120 calendar days.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Public Works department staff will coordinate the new flooring installations with each of the affected departments to minimize disruptions; all work will be phased accordingly.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Flooring Installations at Various City Facilities project will cost $150,000. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$185,343 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: 52195
Building Maintenance Fund
$163,040 GL: 43110-6070-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: 52194
Building Maintenance Fund
39 of 638
3 d 4

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This project is Categorically Exempt under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 and exemption pursuant state CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the Resolution adopting the project Specifications for the Flooring Installations at Various City Facilities and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids.

Alternative 2: Do not adopt the Resolution adopting the project Specifications for the Flooring Installation at Various City Facilities. Doing so, would require the Public Works Department to continue to commit resources to repair the existing flooring systems.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Kevin Todd, Assistant Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
40 of 638
4d
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

ADOPTING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FLOORING INSTALLATION AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES, SPECIFICATION NO. 3943 AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1.The Specifications on file in the City Clerk’s office for the Flooring Installations Various City Facilities including the various documents incorporated therein, are hereby approved, adopted, designated and shall hereafter be known as Specification No. 3943.

SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to advertise for bids for the work, equipment and materials described in this Specifications adopted by this Resolution.

Adopted this _____ day of ____________, 2023.
____________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
41 of 638
4e

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project
1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Infrastructure Engineers to provide Professional Engineering Services for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $408,344, plus a 10 percent contingency of $40,800.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A professional services agreement is needed for a consultant to provide engineering services for a critical Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project, the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project). The consultants will complete the design plans, specifications, and estimates needed to advertise and award a construction contract for this project and assist in as-needed bidding and construction support services.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, the consulting team of Infrastructure Engineers was selected to perform the work for the Project.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Environmental Stewardship: This project will provide shade, reduce the urban heat island effect, capture and treat storm water runoff, and use native drought-tolerant plants in improve health, reduce pollution, recharge aquifers, and save water.

Infrastructure: This project will improve the infrastructure for various modes of travel, repave neighborhood streets, and implement storm water capture infrastructure.

Mobility/Connectivity/Safety: This project will improve access to public spaces by improving walking paths, installing shade trees, and implementing traffic calming 42 of 638
2 e 4
measures to improve safety for various modes of travel.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Infrastructure Engineers to provide engineering services for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $408,344 plus a 10 percent contingency of $40,800, for a total of $449,144.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department maintains a robust CIP that is guided by multiple action plans accepted or adopted by the city, as well as the previously certified Pavement Management Program (PMP), that was completed in 2021 following a comprehensive and automated analysis.

The South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project is part of the city’s annual effort to rehabilitate roadway pavements in residential neighborhoods using various pavement treatment methods. The various treatment methods will consist of low-cost roadway maintenance strategies, standard street rehabilitation methods, and full-depth reconstruction practices. This project will prolong the service life of the pavement, prevent further deterioration, seal aged and cracked pavements, restore skid resistance, improve the ride characteristic of the roadway, reinforce the street structural integrity, and extend or begin a new service life of the neighborhood’s streets.

The project will also construct new ADA compliant curb ramps, remove and replace damaged concrete pavements, including sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveways, cross gutters, plant trees in empty and new tree wells to expand the urban forest and street shade structures, and install new traffic striping, pavement markings and signage.

Additional improvements will include high visibility and creative crosswalks at intersections, bus stop amenity and bus shelter improvements, drywells, curb bulb-outs, and traffic signal modifications.

Furthermore, as part of this project, a Traffic Corridor Study (TCS) will be completed before any design plans are prepared to study the existing conditions of the roadway segments, including the lane configurations and pedestrian and bikeway facilities. The study will recommend at least two design alternatives that will be shared with the community for discussion and final decision to then progress to the construction document phase. The TCS will study the feasibility of modifying turn lanes, implementing new bicycle facilities, installing raised medians, and conducting level of service and vehicle miles traveled analyses.

The Public Works Department reached out to Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to obtain Measure R funding to fund the project’s traffic signal modification design and construction. The traffic signal modification portion of this project is included in Metro Board’s approved project list and Staff has executed a Funding Agreement and amendment with Metro for this project in the amount of $1,650,000. 43 of 638
3 e 4

ANALYSIS
An RFP was issued on July 6, 2022, for Professional Engineering Services for this project. On August 3, 2022, a virtual proposer conference was held to share details of the RFP with interested consultants.

To further ensure competitive proposals, the city advertised the project on the following plans holders’ web sites:

1. Bid America 4. Construct Connect 7. Dodge Data & Analytics

2. The Blue Book 5. Direct Connection

Lastly, the RFP was also posted on eBidboard, which is a web enabled data service to the public sector, for the dissemination of the building and construction project proposals to their large number of member contractors and consultants and was also posted on the city’s website.

On August 26, 2022, the city received two proposals from consulting teams for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project under RFP #2022-101.

An evaluation team of staff from Public Works reviewed the proposals. The proposals were all ranked based on the proposer’s experience, measurable and trackable results, quality of submittal, and cost/budget control. All the proposers for each project were then interviewed.

Based on the combination of the evaluation of the written submittals and the results of the interviews, the evaluation team determined Infrastructure Engineers team to be the top ranked firm for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Staff then held a negotiation conference with Infrastructure Engineers and were successfully able to reduce the schedule of fees with Infrastructure Engineers from the original $421,009 to the final fee of $408,344 which translates to a three percent reduction, without any modifications to the required scope of services.

Infrastructure Engineers’ primary responsibilities will include pre-design development plans, design development plans, and as-needed bidding and construction support assistance.

Infrastructure Engineers has recent experience on a variety of Public Works projects of similar scope and cost. They have successfully delivered similar projects for the cities of Montebello, Baldwin Park, and Lynwood. They also completed numerous projects in southern California and Los Angeles County. City staff also checked Infrastructure Engineers’ references, which were all positive.
44 of 638
4 e 4
The construction cost for the project is estimated at $6,000,000. The expected range for professional engineering services for these types of standard improvement projects is 7 percent to 10 percent of the total construction cost. The proposed cost by Infrastructure Engineers ($408,344) is approximately 6.8 percent, which is well below the accepted range of industry standards.

Additionally, the budget includes approximately 10 percent of the contract amount, or $40,800 for staff who will provide project management and consultant oversight services and 10 percent or $40,800 for contract contingency, as follows:

Base Professional Services Agreement $ 408,344
Agreement 10% Contingency $ 40,800
Staff Project Management Time $ 40,800
Total: $ 489,944
Table 1
Project Description: Professional Engineering Services for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project
RFP Approved: N/A
Advertisement Method: Bid America, The Blue Book, Construction Bid Board, Construct Connect, Direct Connection, PlanIT
Reprographics, Dodge Data & Analytics, eBidBoard,
Glendale Independent Newspaper, City’s website
RFP Issued: July 6, 2022
RFP Due Date: August 26, 2022
Company Name(s): 1. Nichols Consulting Engineers, CHTD

2. Infrastructure Engineers
Selection Criteria
(If SS, list applicable
Provision):

Proposer’s experience; measurable and trackable
results; quality of submittal; cost/budget control
Recommended
Consultant(s):

Infrastructure Engineers
New / Existing
Consultant(s):

Existing
Procurement Method
(RFP / SS):

RFP
Contract Term: 2 years
Project Begins: Upon signing of contract
Project Ends: Upon the expiration date of the contract
45 of 638
5 e 4

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Outreach on this project will continue to occur through a dedicated website. The webpage introduces the public to the project and to the project team, explain the scope of work and project locations, project phases, upcoming outreach events, and provide the public with staff contact information for questions, discussion and/or input.

Additional project outreach will occur at approximately 60% construction plan completion. The community meeting will be hosted in person and will inform the public of the project details, construction schedule, future city and contractor notifications, and the impacts of the construction work in their neighborhood. Participants will also have the opportunity to provide their comments and/or ask questions regarding the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The overall design development phase for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project will cost $489,944, which was approved as a part of the FY 2022- 23 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time for this project. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 1,639,878 GL: 43110-2550-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00380BG
Measure R Subregional Fund
$ 5,443,242 GL: 43110-4020-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00380AN
State Gas Tax Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
These projects are categorically exempt from environmental review because of CEQA Guidelines §§ 15301.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Infrastructure Engineers to provide engineering services for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $408,344, plus a 10 percent contingency of $40,800.
46 of 638
6 e 4
Alternative 2: Do not to award the professional services agreement as recommended herein. This would result in the delay of the construction of the CIP improvements and implementation of the PMP and result in the forfeiture of Metro grant funds.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project Project Location Map
Exhibit 2: Infrastructure Engineers Campaign Disclosure Forms 47 of 638
MOTION
Moved by Council Member __________________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute a professional services agreement – subject to approval by the City Attorney – with Infrastructure Engineers to provide engineering services for the South Verdugo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $408,344.

2. Authorizes a 10% reserve for contingencies of $40,800.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
48 of 638

E GLENOAKS BLVD OBERLIN DR

MARION DR

COTTAGE GROVE LN

E PALMER AV TYLER ST

PARK AV

ROMULUS DR

E ACACIA AV

E GARFIELD AV

E WINDSOR RD

E MAPLE ST PORTER ST

E GARFIELD AV E WINDSOR RD N BELMONT ST SINCLAIR AV
E CALIFORNIA AV ZERR CT SINCLAIR AV McHENRY RD

E HARVARD ST

E WILSON AV

E CALIFORNIA AV
E. LEXINGTON DR

E COLORADO ST

E CHEVY CHASE DR S ADAMS ST S ADAMS ST

E RALEIGH ST S CEDAR ST

E CHESTNUT ST

E ELK AV

W LOMITA AV S BELMONT ST S EVERETT ST S CEDAR STS BELMONT ST S CEDAR ST N EVERETT ST

OAK VISTA DR RICHARD AV CHEROKEE LN OSCEO LA ST HIGH LINE RD

VERD OAKS DR

HILDA DR PLUMAS ST PORTER ST PALMER DR

GREEN ST

ORCHARD AV

HARVEY DR

VALLEJO DR HOLLY DR

WILSON TERR

CALIFORNIA AV

E HARVARD ST CAMPUS ST CARR DR MAYNARD STLUKENS PL SINCLAIR AV WILSON AV

DIXON ST

ROCKGLEN AV

E MAPLE ST

KENT PL LAFAYETTE ST ZINNIA LN GRISWORD ST

STANLEY AV OLIVE ST FISCHER ST WING ST

ORANGE GROVE AV S CHEVY CHASE DR REYNOLDS DR VISTA CT LANGLEY ST

E BROADWAY

E ORANGE GROVE AV

CARLTON DR
2 FWY

E WINDSOR RD LINCOLN AV

N GLENDALE AV

N VERDUGO RD S VERDUGO RD CITY OF GLENDALE CITY OF LOS ANGELES CA-134 FWY

STREET AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

SOUTH VERDUGO ROAD PAVEMENT

REHABILITATION PROJECT

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION

SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (BY CITY)
49 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
IV. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Infrastructure Engineers 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250, Brea, CA 92821 Ray Abassi 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea CA 92821
Sid Mousavi 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea CA 92821 Farzad Dorrani 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea CA 92821 Ray Abassi & Sid Mousavi 3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250 Brea CA 92821 50 of 638
5 Infrastructure Engineers
51 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
P.A. & Associates, Inc 30 Edelman Irvine CA 92618
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Parviz Azar Chief Executive Officer I President 30 Edelman ln.,ini=> CA 92618 Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 1 0% interest owner
** "Subcontractor" is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor's Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons' name and business address.

Cam ai n Committee owned or controlled b :

Title Business Address Ci State Zi

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named D Contractor� Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute- or if I select additional- architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
• I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ■ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and • I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is ___ pages.

Executed on: August 23rd � � 20...l£_, at: ----'1'-=
2;.:.:::0:.::3c.c;.p.:..:..m;__ _____________ , California.

Signature: -------�� l,.__ /_""r:::,..C:...-��,----------- Print Full Name: ---- Parviz Azar Address: __,""'0'--' 3 E""d"'"'e""'"lm!.!.!-=!a.!.!.n....,l"-'rv'--"in'-'-'e"-'--"C"'-A--'--""92,.,_,6"-1""8'------------------------------------------ Phone Number: --------------- 949-679-7474 E-mail Address: [email protected] 52 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
s ubcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
On Point Land Survevino, Inc. 1906 Orange Tree Ln, Ste 240, Redlands, CA 92374 Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Tonv Smith Chief Executive Officer/ President 1906 Oranae Tree Ln Ste 240 Redlands CA 92374 Chief Operating Officer
Janice Smith Chief Financial Officer 1906 Orange Tree Ln, Ste 240 Redlands CA 92374 Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** "Subcontractor'' is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor's Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons' name and business address.

Cam ai n Committee owned or controlled b :

Tltle Business Address
On behalf of the above-named D Contractor [R] Subcontractor:

Ci State Zi

CERTIFICATION
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute- or if I select additional- architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that
■ I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; ■ The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and ■ I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is _1 __ pages.

Executed on: -�A""'=u.,.._""s ...... t-'-=2 ..... 3 __ �- ,--r1-..,....➔.----' 20..1.L_, at __________ R ___ e ..... d"'"la ...... n ___ d ___ s ______ , California.

Signature: --��-II-"��-��---......_�------------- Print Full Name: Shari Todd, Operations Manager Address: 1906 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 240, Redlands, CA 92374 Phone Number: --------------- 909-792-2221 E-mail Address: 53 of 638 office@onpointlandsurveying. com RFP No. PWA 2022-101
s ubcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS 2129 W PACIFIC AVENUE WEST COVINA CA 91790 Full Name Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
NICOLE HUE NGUY EN Chief Executive Officer I President PO BOX 1313 GLENDORA CA 9174 0 Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** "Subcontractor" is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor's Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons' name and business address.

Cam ai n Committee owned or controlled b :

Title Business Address Cl State ZI

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named D Contractor liZl Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute- or if I select additional- architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (1 0) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
• I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; • The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and • I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is __ __ 1 pages.

Executed on: AUGUST 24th , 20�, at: ___ WE.
_ ST_C__O_V_
IN_A ___________ , California.

Signature: _ 11_�_� _ .;;.___J_.�=---��::)-41-e�lre-::'.'.�------ Print Full Name: __ NIC__O_L_E_H _UE__N_GU__Y_E _N ________ _ Address: ___
PO_B_O__X_13_1_3_
GLE__N_DO__RA_,_C_A__
917__4_0 ___________________________ _
Phone Number: -------------- (6 26)893-423 1 E-mail Address: -----�------------ [email protected]
54 of 638
4f

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement for engineering services for Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with NV5, Inc. to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $368,500, plus a 10 percent contingency of $36,850.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A professional services agreement is needed for a consultant to provide engineering services for a critical Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project, the Fiscal Year 2022- 2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project (Project). The consultant will complete the design plans, specifications, and estimates needed to advertise and award a construction contract for this project and assist in as-needed bidding and construction support services.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, the consulting team of NV5, Inc. was selected to perform the work for the Project.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Environmental Stewardship: This project will provide shade, reduce the urban heat island effect, capture, and treat storm water runoff, and use native drought-tolerant plants in improve health, reduce pollution, recharge aquifers, and save water.

Infrastructure: This project will improve the infrastructure for various modes of travel, repave neighborhood streets, and implement storm water capture infrastructure.

Mobility/Connectivity/Safety: This project will improve access to public spaces by improving walking paths, installing shade trees, and implementing traffic calming 55 of 638
2 f 4
measures to improve safety for various modes of travel.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement with NV5, Inc. to provide engineering services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $368,500 plus a 10 percent contingency of $36,850, for a total of $405,350.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department maintains a robust CIP that is guided by multiple action plans accepted or adopted by the city, as well as the previously certified Pavement Management Program (PMP) that was completed in 2021 following a comprehensive and automated analysis.

The Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project is part of the city’s annual effort to rehabilitate roadway pavements in residential neighborhoods using various pavement treatment methods. The various treatment methods will consist of low-cost roadway maintenance strategies, standard street rehabilitation methods, and full-depth reconstruction practices. This project will prolong the service life of the pavement, prevent further deterioration, seal aged and cracked pavements, restore skid resistance, improve the ride characteristic of the roadway, reinforce the street structural integrity, and extend or begin a new service life of the neighborhood’s streets.

ANALYSIS
An RFP was issued on July 6, 2022, for Professional Engineering Services for this project. On August 3, 2022, a proposer conference was held to share details of the RFP with interested consultants.

To further ensure competitive proposals, the city advertised the project on the following plans holders’ web sites:

1. Bid America 4. Construct Connect 7. Dodge Data & Analytics

2. The Blue Book 5. Direct Connection

Lastly, the RFP was also posted on eBidboard, which is a web enabled data service to 56 of 638
3 f 4
the public sector, for the dissemination of the building and construction project proposals to their large number of member contractors and consultants and was also posted on the city’s website.

On August 26, 2022, the city received four proposals from consulting teams for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project under RFP #2022-101.

Based on the evaluation of the written submittals and the results of the interviews, the evaluation team selected NV5, Inc. to be the top ranked firm for the Project. Staff then held a negotiation conference with NV5, Inc. and were successfully able to reduce the schedule of fees with NV5, Inc. from the original $377,800 to the final fee of $368,500, which translates to a three percent reduction, without any modifications to the required scope of services.

NV5, Inc.’s primary responsibilities will include pre-design development plans, design development plans, and as-needed bidding and construction support assistance.

NV5, Inc. has recent experience on a variety of Public Works projects of similar scope and cost. They have successfully delivered similar projects for the cities of Placentia, Redondo Beach, and Compton, and were also a former on-call professional engineering service firm with the City of Glendale. They also completed numerous projects in southern California and Los Angeles County. City staff also checked NV5, Inc.’s references, which were all positive.

The construction cost for the project is anticipated at approximately $4,000,000. The expected range for professional engineering services for these types of standard improvement projects is 7 percent to 10 percent of the total construction cost. The proposed cost by NV5, Inc. ($368,500) is approximately 9 percent, which is well within the accepted range of industry standards.

Additionally, the budget includes approximately 10 percent of the contract amount, or $36,850 for staff who will provide project management and consultant oversight services and 10 percent or $36,850 for contract contingency, as follows:

Base Professional Services Agreement $ 368,500
Agreement 10% Contingency $ 36,850
Staff Project Management Time $ 36,850
Total: $ 442,200
Table 1
57 of 638
4 f 4
Project Description: Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program
Implementation Project
RFP Approved: N/A
Advertisement Method: Bid America, The Blue Book, Construction Bid Board, Construct Connect, Direct Connection, PlanIT
Reprographics, Dodge Data & Analytics, eBidBoard,
Glendale Independent Newspaper, City’s website
RFP Issued: July 6, 2022
RFP Due Date: August 26, 2022
Company Name(s): 1. Nichols Consulting Engineers, CHTD

2. Infrastructure Engineers

3. Onward Engineering

4. NV5, Inc.

Selection Criteria
(If SS, list applicable
Provision):

Proposer’s experience; measurable and trackable
results; quality of submittal; cost/budget control
Recommended
Consultant(s):

NV5, Inc.

New / Existing
Consultant(s):

Existing
Procurement Method
(RFP / SS):

RFP
Contract Term: 2 years
Project Begins: Upon signing of contract
Project Ends: Upon the expiration date of the contract

FISCAL IMPACT
The overall design development phase and initial infrastructure upgrade cost for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project will cost $442,200, which was approved as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. An additional appropriation will be needed for the construction phase of this project. No new appropriation is being requested at this time for this project. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 1,989,869 GL: 43110-4020-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00576AN
State Gas Tax Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
These projects are categorically exempt from environmental review because of CEQA Guidelines §§ 15301.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager or to execute a Professional Services Agreement with NV5, Inc. to provide engineering services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of cost $368,500 plus a 10 percent contingency of $36,850.

Alternative 2: Do not to award the professional services agreements and contract amendments as recommended herein. This would result in the delay of the construction of the CIP improvements and implementation of the PMP.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer 59 of 638
6 f 4
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project Location Map
Exhibit 2: NV5, Inc. Campaign Disclosure Forms
60 of 638
4f
MOTION
Moved by Council Member __________________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute a professional services agreement – subject to approval by the City Attorney – with NV5 Inc. for three hundred sixty-eight thousand five hundred dollars ($368,500) to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project

2. Authorizes a 10% reserve for contingencies of thirty-six thousand eight hundred fifty dollars ($36,850).

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
61 of 638

SANTA FE RAILROAD OBERLIN DR

MARION DR E CYPRESS ST COTTAGE GROVE LN

S ADAMS ST

E PALMER AVTYLER ST

PARK AV

ROMULUS DR E ACACIA AV

E MAPLE ST PORTER ST

E GARFIELD AV

E HARVARD ST

E WILSON AV

ROSSLYN ST

CARMEL ST

GARDENA AV

EULALIA ST

S BRAND BLVD

GARDENA AV

W CYPRESS ST MAGNOLIA AV S MARYLAND AV

CYPRESS ST
W LOS FELIZ RD LAUREL ST S. BRAND BLVD S ORANGE ST
CYPRESS ST HAGUE CT S. CENTRAL AV

E COLORADO ST

BOYNTON ST

MARIPOSA ST

E CHEVY CHASE DR MARIPOSA ST

E PALMER AV W PALMER AV MAGNOLIA AV E PALMER AV

E CHEVY CHASE DR S ADAMS ST S ADAMS ST PEPPER WYE GARFIELD AV GRANADA ST S CEDAR ST

E ACACIA AV E ACACIA AV

E GARFIELD

E MAPLE ST

E CHESTNUT ST

E LOMITA AV

E RALEIGH ST

E CHESTNUT ST

E ELK AV W LOMITA AV

E ELK AV W ELK AV E ELK AV

E COLORADO ST

E MAPLE ST S BELMONT ST

E CHESTNUT ST S EVERETT ST

E LOMITA AV FRANKLIN CT S EVERETT ST S CEDAR STS BELMONT ST S CEDAR ST S ISABEL ST S JACKSON ST S KENWOOD ST

E HARVARD ST S LOUISE ST AV

E WILSON AV

E BROADWAY

E WINDSOR RD W WINDSOR RD

W CHESTNUT ST
W LOMITA AVS. BRAND BLVD S CENTRAL AV

W GARFIELD AV W ACACIA AV W ACACIA AV SAN FERNANDO RD S PACIFIC AV EDISON PL S KENILWORTH AV

SAN FERNANDO RD

W HARVARD ST

VINE ST S CENTRAL AV S COLUMBUS AV

W COLORADO ST
OAK ST

IVY ST N KENILWORTH AV

W WILSON AV PORTER ST

CATHEDRAL DR PALMER DR

GREEN ST

DARTMOUTH DR

PRINCETON DR

SCOFIELD DR

KENT PL OLIVE ST FISCHER ST WING ST S CHEVY CHASE DR

ORANGE GROVE AV

REYNOLDS DR

VISTA CT MARIPOSA ST BOYNTON ST

OAKRIDGE DR

W CERRITOS AV MIRA LOMA AV

LOS FELIZ

W CERRITOS AV

W CYPRESS ST MAGNOLIA AV

W PALMER AV

EL BONITO AV

RAILROAD

FERNANDO CT

LOS ANGELES ST

GARDENA AV RAILROAD

MADISON WY ROADS END

MISSION RD

COLBY DR

W GARFIELD AV W WINDSOR RD FLORENCE PL VIRGINIA PL S MARYLAND AV

W MAPLE ST S KENILWORTH AV

RIVERDALE DR W LOMITA AV

TYBURN ST S MARYLAND
ST

ST S BRAND BLVD
ALLEY #62

E BROADWAY

FOREST LAWN

MEMORIAL PARK

E ORANGE GROVE AV

CARLTON DR

E WINDSOR RD

S GLENDALE AV

N GLENDALE AV S ORANGE ST

W ELK AV

W MAPLE ST S COLUMBUS AVS LOUISE ST

CITY OF GLENDALE CITY OF LOS ANGELES

OVERLAY/RESURFACING
EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS
ARAM I

ARAM III
62 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
IV. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer / President
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

NV5, Inc.

Dickerson Wright, Director
see above
Alexander A. Hockman, Director
Edward Codispoti
Richard Tong, and noted above
NV5 Global, Inc.
200 South Park Road, Suite 350
200 South Park Road, Suite 350
200 South Park Road, Suite 350
200 South Park Road, Suite 350
200 South Park Road, Suite 350
200 South Park Road, Suite 350
Hollywood
Hollywood
Hollywood
Hollywood
Hollywood
Hollywood
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
33021
33021
33021
33021
33021
33021
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618
City of Glendale — FY 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project NV5 | 25 63 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
 I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure;  The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and  I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
2 August 1 22 Irvine
Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE
949.585.0477 [email protected]
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618
City of Glendale — FY 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project NV5 | 26 64 of 638
4g

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement for Professional Engineering Services for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $587,075, plus a 10 percent contingency of $58,700.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for April 11, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A professional services agreement is needed for a consultant to provide engineering services for a critical Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project, the Fiscal Year 2023- 2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project (Project). The consultants will complete the design plans, specifications, and estimates needed to advertise and award a construction contract for this project and assist in as-needed bidding and construction support services.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, the consulting team of Onward Engineering was selected to perform the work for the Project.

Infrastructure: This project will improve the infrastructure for various modes of travel, repave neighborhood streets, and implement storm water capture infrastructure.

Mobility/Connectivity/Safety: This project will improve access to public spaces by improving walking paths, planting shade trees, and implementing traffic calming 65 of 638
2 g 4
measures to improve safety for various modes of travel.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with Onward Engineering to provide Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $587,075 plus a 10 percent contingency of $58,700, for a total of $645,775.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department maintains a robust CIP that is guided by multiple action plans adopted by the city, as well as the previously certified Pavement Management Program (PMP) and was completed in 2021 following a comprehensive and automated analysis.

The Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project is part of the city’s annual effort to rehabilitate roadway pavements in residential neighborhoods using various pavement treatment methods. The various treatment methods will consist of low-cost roadway maintenance strategies, standard street rehabilitation methods, and full-depth reconstruction practices. This project will prolong the service life of the pavement, prevent further deterioration, seal aged and cracked pavements, restore skid resistance, improve the ride characteristic of the roadway, reinforce the street structural integrity, and extend or begin a new service life of the neighborhood’s streets.

The project will also construct new ADA compliant curb ramps, remove, and replace damaged concrete pavements, including sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveways, cross gutters, plant trees in empty and new tree wells to expand the urban forest and street shade structures, and install new traffic striping, pavement markings and signage.

ANALYSIS
An RFP was issued on July 6, 2022, for professional engineering services for this project. On August 3, 2022, a proposer conference was held to share details of RFP #2022-101 with interested consultants.

To further ensure competitive proposals, the city advertised the project on the following plans holders’ web sites:

1. Bid America 4. Construct Connect 7. Dodge Data & Analytics

2. The Blue Book 5. Direct Connection

3. Construction Bid Board 6. PlanIT Reprographics
These plan holders’ websites publish requests for proposals for projects and distribute the information to their extensive network of consultant, contractor, and construction industry contacts. The project was also advertised in the Glendale Independent. 66 of 638
3 g 4
Lastly, the RFP was also posted on eBidboard, which is a web enabled data service to the public sector, for the dissemination of the building and construction project proposals to their large number of member contractors and consultants and was also posted on the city’s website.

On August 26, 2022, the city received four proposals from consulting teams for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project under.

Based on the combination of the review of the proposals and the results of the interviews, the selection team determined that the Onward Engineering team was the top ranked firm for the Project. Staff then held a negotiation conference with Onward Engineering and were successfully able to reduce the schedule of fees with Onward Engineering from the original $774,070 to the final fee of $587,075 which translates to a 24 percent reduction, without any modifications to the required scope of services.

Onward Engineering’s primary responsibilities include pre-design development plans, design development plans, and as-needed bidding and construction support assistance.

Onward Engineering has recent experience on a variety of Public Works projects of similar scope and cost. They have successfully delivered similar projects for the cities of Downey, Diamond Bar, Hesperia, and Norwalk. They also completed numerous projects in southern California and Los Angeles County. Staff also checked Onward Engineering’s references, which were all positive.

The construction cost for the project is anticipated at approximately $7,000,000. The expected range for professional engineering services for these types of standard improvement projects is 7 to 10 percent of the total construction cost. The proposed cost by Onward Engineering ($587,075) is approximately 8.4 percent, which is well within the accepted range of industry standards.

Additionally, the budget includes approximately 10 percent of the contract amount, or $58,700 for staff who will provide project management and consultant oversight services and 10 percent or $58,700 for contract contingency.

Therefore, the total costs for the Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project are as follows:

Base Professional Services Agreement $ 587,075
Agreement 10% Contingency $ 58,700
Staff Project Management Time $ 58,700
Total: $ 704,475
67 of 638
4 g 4
Table 1
Project Description: Professional Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program
Implementation Project
RFP Approved: N/A
Advertisement Method: Bid America, The Blue Book, Construction Bid Board, Construct Connect, Direct Connection, PlanIT
Reprographics, Dodge Data & Analytics, eBidBoard,
Glendale Independent Newspaper, City’s website
RFP Issued: July 6, 2022
RFP Due Date: August 26, 2022
Company Name(s): 1. Nichols Consulting Engineers, CHTD

2. Infrastructure Engineers

3. Onward Engineering

4. NV5, Inc.

Selection Criteria
(If SS, list applicable
Provision):

Proposer’s experience; measurable and trackable
results; quality of submittal; cost/budget control
Recommended
Consultant(s):

Onward Engineering
New / Existing
Consultant(s):

New
Procurement Method
(RFP / SS):

RFP
Contract Term: 2 years
Project Begins: Upon signing of contract
Project Ends: Upon the expiration date of the contract

FISCAL IMPACT
The overall design development phase and initial infrastructure upgrade cost for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project will cost $704,475, which was approved as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. An additional appropriation will be needed for the construction phase of this project. No new appropriation is being requested at this time for this project. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 1,989,869 GL: 43110-4020-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00576AN
State Gas Tax Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
These projects are categorically exempt from environmental review because of CEQA Guidelines §§ 15301.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering to provide Engineering Services for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project in the amount of $587,075, plus a 10 percent contingency of $58,700.

Alternative 3: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. 69 of 638
6 g 4

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project Location Map
Exhibit 2: Onward Engineering Campaign Disclosure Forms 70 of 638
MOTION
Moved by Council Member __________________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute a professional services agreement – subject to approval by the City Attorney – with Onward Engineering,Inc., for $587,075 to provide engineering services for the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Pavement Management Program Implementation Project

2. Authorizes a 10% reserve for contingencies of $58,700.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
71 of 638

BOSTON AV

PENNSYLVANIA AV

ZOE ANNE WY

SKY RIDGE RD

BRITTANY LN SKYVIEW LN

REYNARD AV ACAMPO AV MARKRIDGE RD

EL MORENO STEL CAMINITO PL

FRANKLIN ST FAIRESTA ST ABELLA ST

ALTURA AV

GROMER TER GROMER TER HENRITETTA AV

MEVEL PL

BROOKHILL ST

HENRITETTA AV

CHERYL AV

EL CAMINITO ST PONTIAC ST

FAIRESTA ST

ALTURA AV NEW YORK AV

KENTUCKY

QUAIL CANYON RD

MARKRIDGE RD RIMHILL RD

FRANCES AV MARYLAND AV CHERYL AV

PONTIAC ST FAIRESTA ST

DAY ST ARNELL PL

BOSTON AV BURRITT WY

SANTA CARLOTTA ST EL CAMINITO ST

MARKRIDGE RD

CAROLYN WY TREND TER

BURRITT WY PARAISO WY

PARAISO WY

EL CAMINITO ST LOS AMIGOS ST EL MORENO ST LOS OLIVOS LN

FRANKLIN ST MOORE ST

FOOTHILL BLVD DANNY ST

VISTA CT LAUDERDALE AV

VIRGINIA ST

FIRST AV SECOND AV

THIRD AV FOURTH AV FIFTH AV

SECOND AV BOSTON AV

BETH PL

LIRIO LN

WILEY LN

MAYFIELD AV

ANDERSON AV LEHMAN LN HONOLULU AV

LOWELL AV

COMMUNITY AV

MARYANN ST PROSPECT AVE

FAIRCHILD ST FOOTHILL BLVD FAIRMONT AV MELANIE

FREDERICK ST

FAIRESTA ST LOS OLIVOS LN ALABAMA ST

STEVENS ST

WILLALEE AV

REBECCA AV

DANNY DR

RETA ST SANTA CARLOTTA ST EL CAMINITO PONTIAC ST CLOUDSDALE AV

PARAISO WY BURRITT WY BROOKHILL ST HENRITETTA AV FREDERICK AV

GLENCOVE AV

VERWOOD AV

COMMUNITY AV ABELLA ST

MEVEL PL FINEHILL AV
LN
ST

LOWELL AV

FOURTH AV

DUNSMORE AV

GLENCOVE AV
MARYANN ST THELMA ST ALLEY 138
ALLEY 140

LAUDERDALE AV FREDERICK AV

BROOKHILL TER
I-210 FWY CITY OF GLENDALE CITY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF GLENDALE

OVERLAY/RESURFACING
EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

SLURRY SEAL
SHEET 1 of 2
SEE SHEET 2
72 of 638

MARYANN ST

KENTUCKY

WASHINGTON PL

MANHATTAN AV

MANHATTAN AV LOCKERBIE LN

HILLWAY DR MANOR LN

PIEDMONT AV

OAK CIRCLE DR

EMANUEL DR

CAMANN ST

EILINITA AV DOLORITA AV

SHIRLYJEAN ST MALAFIA DROAKMONT VIEW DR

MILDINE DR COUNRTY CLUB DRURQUIDEZ AV

VALVERDE CT

VALVERDE PL ROSELAWN AVE ANGELUS AV

BROADVIEW DR

SUNVIEW DR

HONOLULU PL

PINEWOOD LN PENNSYLVANIA AV

EL LADO DR CLOUD AV

WHITING WOODS RD

MESA LILA RD

DEER PASS RD MESA LILA RD PICKENS ST RAYMOND AVE

MONTROSE AV GLENWOOD AV

GLENWOOD AVRAMSDELL AV

OAKENDALE PL

GLENWOOD AV

INVALE DR LA CRESCENTA AV

MANHATTAN AV PIEDMONT AV HERMOSA AV

HONOLULU AV

OAKSIDE LN

PLEASURE WY

AGNER AV

SYCAMORE AV

OAK CIRCLE DR

OAKGROVE CTHONOLULU AV MONTROSE AV BOSTON AV

ANDERSON AV

POYNETTE ST

CEDARBEND DR FORESTGLEN DR

BEECHGLEN DR
EL LADO DR WILLALLE AV FREDERICK av

ENCINAL AV

MONTROSE AV

ALTURA AV

PROSPECT AV COMMUNITY AV

PROSPECT AVE

HONOLULU AV

MILLS AV

PARKVISTA DR

NEW YORK AV

VERDUGO WOODS HWY VERDUGO WOODS HWY WEST

CELITA WOODS HWY

VERDUGO WOODS HWY EAST

WHITING
PL

SYCAMORE AV

PLTANBARK

PLFERNTREE

CLOUD AV LIBERTY AV

HERMOSA AV

PARKVISTA PL
DUNSMORE AV MARYLAND AV ALLEY 132 I-210 FWY
I-210 FWY CITY OF GLENDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FREDERICK ST EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

OVERLAY/RESURFACING

CITY LIMITS

SLURRY SEAL
SHEET 2 of 2
SEE SHEET 1

NOT TO SCALE
73 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
IV. DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.

Contractor(s)*:

Majdi Ataya, PE 300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 814 Anaheim CA 92805 74 of 638
RFP No. PWA 2022-101
Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.

Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

X
2 X
CL Surveying and Mapping Inc. 400 E. Rincon Street, Ste. 202, Corona, CA 92879 Lam Le, PLS 400 E. Rincon Street, Ste. 202, Corona CA 92879 August 26th 22 300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 814, Anaheim
300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 814, Anaheim, CA 92805
(714) 533-3050 [email protected]
Majdi Ataya, PE
75 of 638
9a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Public Hearing Regarding Request for Approval of a Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, Inclusive of Discretionary Density Bonus, pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law, to construct a new 43-unit residential housing development project, providing a total of eight affordable units reserved for Very Low Income Households (Density Bonus Housing Plan Case No. PDBP2212648) on property addresses 424, 430, and 434 West Milford Street.

1. Motion to approve Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of discretionary density bonus;

2. Motion to deny Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of discretionary density bonus.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for April 11, 2023 Calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The applicant is seeking approval of a Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan with a request for a discretionary 152.9% density bonus, as well as three concessions, pursuant to State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq.). State Density Bonus Law allows developers that restrict at least 15 percent of the units in a housing development as rentals to very low-income households a mandatory 50% density bonus, as well as three concessions. The applicant is requesting a greater than 50% density bonus, and thus, pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, this discretionary request is subject to City Council approval following a public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. The project involves the demolition of five existing residential structures on site, and the construction of a new 43-unit multi-family density bonus housing development totaling 30,665 square feet over a one-level, semi-subterranean parking structure containing 36 residential parking spaces and providing eight (8) affordable units reserved for very lowincome households (“Project”). The Project qualifies for reduced parking inclusive of 76 of 638
2 a 9
guest and handicapped spaces, under the State Density Bonus Law and Glendale Municipal Code.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Housing: The City Council recently adopted an eight-year Housing Element of the Glendale General Plan. The proposed 43-unit multi-family residential housing development provides eight affordable units reserved for very low income households, which is consistent with Goal 3 of the Housing Element, to increase opportunities for affordable housing by continuing density bonus programs meant to encourage the private development of affordable housing.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan application, inclusive of the requested discretionary density bonus, after review and consideration of the associated environmental review.

BACKGROUND
The Project is addressed as 424, 430 and 434 West Milford Street, Glendale, CA 91203, and is located approximately 0.3 miles west of Downtown Glendale (“Project Site”). The Project Site is located within the R-1650 (Medium-High Density Residential) zone and has a Medium High Density General Plan designation. The Project Site is approximately 21,750 square feet (SF) in size and is currently improved with a total of five residential dwelling units spread across three parcels (APNs: 5637-020-011, 5637-020-012, and 5637-020-013). The Project Site is bordered by multi-family residential development directly to the south, east and west, and Columbus Elementary school to the north (across Milford Street).

General Information
Applicant: Alen Malekian
2255 Honolulu #1A
Montrose, CA 91020
Property Owner: Andre Aboolian
1146 N. Central Ave. # 101
Glendale, CA 91202
Location/APN: 424, 430, and 434 Milford Street
APNs: 5637-020-011, 5637-020-012, and 5637-020-013
Legal Description: Lot 28, 29 and 30, Houston’s West Glendale Tract Zone: R-1650 (Medium-High Density Residential)
Land Use Element: Medium High Density
77 of 638
3 a 9
Surrounding Uses/Zoning:

Zoning Existing Uses
North R-1650 (Medium-High Density)
Residential
(Public School)
Columbus Elementary School
South R-1650 (Medium-High Density)
Residential
Multi-and single-family residential
East R-1650 (Medium-High Density)
Residential
Multi-family residential
West R-1650 (Medium-High Density)
Residential
Multi-family residential
Project Site R-1650 (Medium-High Density)
Residential
Multi- and single-family residential
Utilities and Public Services: All municipal and private utilities are in place serving the neighborhood and other public services are currently provided in the vicinity.

ANALYSIS
Project Description:

As described above, the Project involves the demolition of five existing residential dwelling units on site and the construction of a new, four-story, 43-unit multi-family residential project totaling 30,665 square feet (SF), over a one-level, semi-subterranean parking structure containing 36 residential parking spaces (refer to project plans, attached hereto as Exhibit 2). The Project will provide eight affordable units reserved for very low income households. The Project will require future Design Review Board approval.

State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq.) allows up to an automatic fifty percent (50%) density bonus and three incentives in exchange for the provision of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the base units restricted as rentals for very low income households. The applicant’s request for the grant of a density bonus is greater than the State Density Bonus Law mandatory maximum of fifty percent (50%), which is available to the applicant per a State Density Bonus Law provision allowing an applicant to request a discretionary density bonus above this mandatory maximum if local ordinance allows. (See Cal. Gov’t Code § 65915(n)). Pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, an applicant may seek a density bonus in an amount greater than that required by State Density Bonus Law, which shall be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. (Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, Section 3(1)).
78 of 638
4 a 9
The applicant is entitled to request, and is requesting three (3) concessions (as follows) to:
(1) Increase the maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR); (2) Increase the maximum allowed building height and stories; and (3) Not be subject to the requirement to provide additional open space for additional density gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet wide.

The applicant may not request additional concessions. However, the applicant may request unlimited waivers; the applicant is not requesting any waivers here.

Discretionary Density Bonus Findings Can Be Made:

Sites zoned R-1650 with more than 90 feet of frontage are permitted one (1) unit per 1,320 square feet, which permits a maximum residential density of 17 units per acre. By right, the applicant has a base density of 17 units (21,750/1,320 = 16.48 rounded up to 17). The applicant is entitled to a fifty percent (50%) density bonus by right because the applicant is restricting at least fifteen percent (15%) of the units for rent to very low income households, or three very low income units (15 percent of the base density of 17 = 2.55 (rounded up to 3)). The mandatory 50% density bonus would allow the applicant to go up to 26 units (50% of 17 is 8.5, which must be rounded up to 9, and 17 plus 9 is 26). The applicant is seeking a discretionary one hundred fifty-two and nine tenths of a percent (152.9%) density bonus, which will allow the density to reach 43 units. In exchange for the additional density, the applicant will provide a proportionate number of restricted units, calculated as eight very low income units ((152.9% divided by 50%) x (15% multiplied by the base density (17)) = 7.79 (rounded up to 8)).

In order for Council to approve the discretionary density bonus, the Council would need to weigh the following factors, including, but not limited to: 1) the number and type of affordable units proposed; 2) the housing type, 3) the underlying zone, and 4) neighborhood conditions and compatibility. (Ordinance No. 5966, Section 3(1)).

Council could consider other factors not listed and has the sole discretion to approve or deny the discretionary density bonus request, including the discretion to grant a discretionary bonus in a lower amount than requested. Moreover, Council could impose additional conditions on the project such as requiring a larger number of affordable units, altering the unit mix, and requiring a dispersal of the affordable and market rate units in a different ratio than that proposed.

As set forth above, staff’s opinion is that the applicant has provided a proportional amount of additional affordable units, commensurate with the amount of the discretionary density bonus (approximately 3 times as many affordable units in exchange for approximately three times the mandatory minimum 50% density bonus), all to be restricted as rental units for very low income households. Staff believes the underlying zone and neighborhood conditions are such that the grant of the discretionary density would not be out of character and would be compatible with the existing surrounding multi-family residential uses in this R-1650 (Medium-High Density) zone). 79 of 638
5 a 9
The Project Exceeds Parking Required Under the Mandatory Parking Concession:

Pursuant to California Government Code section 65915(p)(1) and GMC section

30.36.090(A), an applicant may request an automatic (mandatory) parking concession under section 65915(p)(2)(A), which provides that upon the request of an applicant, the required vehicle parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, is not to exceed one-half space per bedroom of a development providing at least eleven percent very low income units located within one-half mile of a major transit stop with unobstructed access (collectively, the “Parking Concession). The Project’s unit mix includes twelve studio units, twenty-seven one-bedroom units and four two-bedroom units. Based on the number of units provided, the Parking Concession requires a minimum of twenty-four residential parking spaces. The Project exceeds the minimum requirement under the Parking Concession and will provide thirty-six parking spaces total, designated for the residential units. Accordingly, the Project, meets and exceeds the parking requirements under State Density Bonus Law.

The Project Satisfies The Replacement Obligation Under State Density Bonus Law:

Per State Density Bonus Law, an applicant is ineligible for a density bonus or any other incentives or concessions if a project is proposed on a parcel or parcels with rental dwelling units that have been vacated or demolished within a five-year period preceding the project’s development application or have been occupied by lower or very low income households, unless the proposed project replaces those units. Pursuant to California Government Code section 65915, if any dwelling units are occupied on the date of a project’s development application, the proposed project is required to provide the same number of units of equivalent size (i.e., the same total number of bedrooms as the units being replaced) as affordable to the same or lower income households in occupancy. If the incomes are unknown to the applicant, there is an established rebuttable presumption per HUD’s Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy database. This presumption amounts to 63% of renter households at or below 80% AMI. Per the Los Angeles County Assessor, between the three parcels, there are currently five existing residential dwelling units at eleven bedrooms total. Through the replacement obligation, the Project owes four units (63% x 5 existing unit = 3.15 rounded up to 4) at seven bedrooms (63% x 11 existing bedrooms = 6.93 rounded up to 7). The Project is providing nine bedrooms through the requirement to provide eight affordable units to very low income households under GMC 30.36. As such, the applicant has met the replacement obligation, and no additional affordable units are required.

Housing Division staff proposes the following eight (8) affordable units:
• Unit 7: 1 bedroom, at 742 square feet;
• Unit 8: 2 bedroom, at 908 square feet;
• Unit 14: 1 bedroom, at 729 square feet;
• Unit 16: 1 bedroom, at 739 square feet;
• Unit 20: alcove studio, at 600 square feet;
• Unit 29: 1 bedroom, at 742 square feet;
• Unit 32: alcove studio, at 600 square feet; and
80 of 638
6 a 9
• Unit 38: 1 bedroom, at 729 square feet
On average, the Project should generate nine bedrooms at approximately, 722 square feet. As proposed, the project generates nine bedrooms at 723 square feet and the units are evenly distributed throughout the project. As such, the Housing Division approves the proposed affordable units.

The Project Satisfies the IZO and Commercial DIF Is Not Applicable:

Per GMC Chapter 30.35, the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (“IZO”) requires a housing development (a rental development project of eight (8) or more dwelling units proposed to be constructed in the City) to provide fifteen percent of the units as affordable to lowincome households. The Project is subject to the IZO. The Project is required to provide three very low income units (15% of the base density of 17 = 2.55 (rounded up to 3)).

The Project will provide eight very low income units, which is 41% of the base density.

Therefore, the Project exceeds the IZO requirement, and no additional affordable units are required under the IZO.

Per GMC 4.11, the Affordable Housing Commercial Development Impact Fee (the “Commercial DIF”) is not applicable to the Project as it does not entail a permitted commercial component.

Recorded Density Bonus Housing Agreement Will Ensure Affordability for 55 Years:

The Developer will be required to enter into a Density Bonus Housing Agreement (“DB Agreement”) in which the Developer will covenant the provision of eight (8) very low income units ((152.9% divided by 50%) x (15% multiplied by the base density (17)) = 7.79 (rounded up to 8)) restricted to be rented to very-low income households. The DB Agreement will be a recorded restriction on the property on which the affordable units and density bonus are constructed. In addition, the DB Agreement will run with the land and bind all future owner and successors in interest for a period of 55 years.

Incentives/ Concessions Required Findings Can Be Made:

Pursuant to State Density Bonus Law and section 30.36.080(A) of the GMC, when an applicant for a density bonus requests incentives or concessions, the approving body, here the City Council, shall grant the requested incentives or concessions, unless written findings are made, based upon substantial evidence, of any one or more of the following:

1. The incentive or concession does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents.

2. The incentive or concession would have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code section 65589.5, or the physical environment or any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactory mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households. As used herein, “specific adverse impact upon public health or safety” 81 of 638
7 a 9
means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. Inconsistency with the Zoning ordinance or the land use designation in the General Plan shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact upon public health or safety.

3. The incentive or concession will be contrary to the state or federal law. The granting of an incentive or concession shall not require or be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a General Plan amendment, zoning change, study or other discretionary approval. For purposes of this subdivision, “study” does not include reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for the concession or incentive or to demonstrate that the incentive or concession meets the definition.

The applicant is seeking approval of three concessions pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, et seq. and GMC Chapter 30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives). The three requested concessions are as follows:

1. Increase maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR): In accordance with GMC Section 30.11.020 Table 30.11-B, the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) for multi-family projects in the R-1650 zone is 1.0 (maximum 21,750 square feet for the subject project). The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable floor area ratio. As proposed, the project features a total FAR of 1.41 (30,665 square feet), exceeding the maximum allowable FAR by 0.41 (8,915 square feet).

2. Increase the maximum height and stories: In accordance with GMC Section

30.11.030 Table 30.11-B, the maximum allowed height is three stories and 36 feet.

The project proposes to increase the maximum allowed number of stories to four and the overall building height to 59 feet, 7-inches (23 feet, 7-inch height increase).

3. Not provide additional common outdoor space: Pursuant to GMC Section

30.31.020.7, a minimum 900 square feet of additional open space for lots greater than 90 feet in width that exceed density plus an additional 20 square feet for each foot of lot width thereafter (the project is required to provide 2,100 square feet) is required. As proposed, the project will not provide the additional open space for additional density gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet.

Concessions (Incentives) Findings
When an applicant for a density bonus requests incentives or concessions, the Council shall grant the requested incentives or concessions, unless it makes written findings, based upon substantial evidence, of any one (1) or more of the following three findings:

1. The concessions (incentives) must be granted unless the Council finds, based on substantial evidence, that the concessions do not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents.
82 of 638
8 a 9
This denial finding cannot be made, as there is no evidence that the incentives will not result in actual cost reduction. The Density Bonus Housing Plan meets the requirements of Government Code Section 65915, et seq. because at least 15% of the total units of the housing development will be restricted to very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code. The Project is located in the R-1650 (Medium-High Density Residential) zone. In accordance with GMC section 30.11.030, Table 30.11-B, the maximum density allowed on a lot where the width is greater than 90 feet is one dwelling unit for every 1,320 square-feet of lot area. The project’s site is 21,750 square feet in size, with a lot width of 150.02 feet. By right, the project has a maximum density allowed of 17 units (21,750 / 1,320 = 16.48 rounded up to 17). The applicant is entitled to a fifty percent density bonus by right because the applicant is restricting at least fifteen percent of the units for rent to very low income households, or three very low income units (15 percent of the base density of 17 = 2.55 (rounded up to 3)).

The applicant is seeking a one hundred fifty-two and nine tenths of a percent (152.9%) density bonus and will be providing a proportionate number of restricted units, calculated as eight very low income units ((152.9% divided by 50%) x (15% multiplied by the base density (17)) = 7.79 (rounded up to 8)). State Density Bonus Law allows up to an automatic fifty percent (50%) density bonus and three incentives in exchange for the provision of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the base units restricted as rentals for very low income households. The applicant’s request complies with State Density Bonus Law, as there is a positive correlation and proportionality between the requested density bonus and the number of very low income units to be provided, and State Density Bonus Law allows the City to grant a discretionary density bonus above fifty percent (50%). The Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan meets the requirements of GMC Section 30.36.050.

The project applicant will be required to execute a DB Agreement, which provides for long-term affordability, subject to review and approval by the City Attorney.

The applicant is seeking approval of three concessions pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, et seq. and GMC Chapter 30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives) for: 1) increasing the maximum allowed FAR to 1.41 (30,665 SF), where the maximum allowed is 1.0 (exceeding the maximum allowed by 0.41 (8,915 SF); 2) increasing the maximum allowed building height to 59 feet, 7-inches (23 feet, 7- inch height increase) and four stories; and 3) Not providing additional outdoor space. Pursuant to GMC Section 30.31.020.7, a minimum 900 square feet of additional open space for lots greater than 90 feet in width that exceed density plus an additional 20 square feet for each foot of lot width thereafter (the project is required to provide 2,100 square feet) is required. As proposed, the Project will not provide the additional open space for additional density gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet.

This denial finding cannot be made, as there is no evidence that the concessions will not result in actual cost reductions to provide for affordable rents. To the contrary, there is substantial evidence that the concessions will result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide affordable rents. The requested 83 of 638
9 a 9
concessions, taken as a whole, are required to allow for the additional density requested and a greater number of units to be constructed on the same amount of lot area. The concessions, together, will reduce costs to the applicant for providing affordable units by creating construction efficiencies and inherent reductions in costs by allowing the construction of a greater number of units. The additional units will result in actual and identifiable cost reductions because the additional units will take advantage of construction efficiencies when being built, and will generate rental income to offset the cost of providing the units at an affordable rent. If the project were to comply with the Zoning Code regulations associated with maximum allowed floor area ratio, building height/number of stories and provide additional outdoor space gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet wide, the footprint of the new building would be significantly impacted, and would subsequently affect the viability of the project and the proposed development buildout. With the requested concessions, the owner/applicant will realize cost reductions that will allow it to provide the eight (8) housing units at an affordable rent.

2. The concessions (incentives) must be granted unless the Council finds, based on substantial evidence, that they will have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, or the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households. Specific, adverse impact is defined as “a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.” (Government Code section 65589.5(d)(2). Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or the land use designation in the General Plan shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact upon public health safety.

The applicant is seeking approval of three concessions pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, et seq. and GMC Chapter 30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives), discussed in detail above, in exchange for providing eight (8) affordable units for very low income households. This denial finding cannot be made as there is no evidence that the incentives will have any adverse impacts. To the contrary, no specific adverse impacts upon public health or safety or on the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources would occur by granting the requested concessions for increased floor area ratio and number of stories and building height, and not provide additional open space gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet.

The Project Site has not been listed on the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, or Glendale Register of Historic Resources, and has not been identified as a historic resource in any survey. 84 of 638
10 a 9
Moreover, an individualized analysis by Planning staff was conducted and staff concluded there is no evidence the Project Site or the structure on the Project Site are historic. (See Exhibit 5). Accordingly, this denial finding cannot be met.

The concessions do not include or necessitate reductions in standards to any state or local Building and Safety Division (Community Development Department), Fire Department or Engineering Division (Public Works Department) requirements or any other objective, identifiable written requirements pertaining to health and safety. The existing residential buildings on the project site which are proposed to be demolished, are not historically or culturally significant. Therefore, demolition of the existing buildings would not be considered a significant impact. Moreover, the proposed project is exempt from further CEQA review based on the fact that it meets the requirements to qualify for a Class 32 “In-fill Development Project” and thus, does not exceed thresholds for noise, traffic, air quality and water and will not result in significant cumulative impacts. Furthermore, the provided setbacks are in compliance with the Zoning Code in order to provide light, air and ventilation for adjacent buildings, which consist of similar multi-family residential buildings to the south, east and west of the subject site.

Furthermore, the concessions allow for additional buildable area on the site, which will then accommodate additional dwelling units. The additional density will, in fact, promote the City’s health and safety in that there will be greater housing opportunities for low income family households. Moreover, the project will advance the goals and policies of the General Plan, Housing Element (2021-2029), including, but not limited to, Goal 1 (“A City with a Wide Range of Housing Types to Meet the Needs of Current and Future Residents), Goal 3 (“A City with Increased Opportunities for Affordable and Special Needs Housing Development) Housing Services that Address Groups with Special Housing Needs) and Policies 3.1 and

3.2 (“Encourage both the private and public sectors to produce or assist in the production of affordable housing for special needs groups such as: persons with disabilities, the elderly, large families, single-parent households, and formerly homeless) and (“Promote the development of extremely low, very low, low and moderate income housing by allowing developers density bonuses or other financial incentives for providing units for low and moderate income residents. The unit mix and location of affordable housing units in density bonus projects must be approved by the City and included in an affordable housing agreement.”).

3. The concessions (incentives) must be granted unless the Council finds, based on substantial evidence, that the concessions will be contrary to state or federal law.

The requested concessions will not be contrary to state or federal law and do not require any other discretionary entitlement other than Design Review Board review and approval. The Project is designed to comply with Building and Safety codes and the proposed 43-unit affordable housing residential project is consistent with the General Plan. The Project meets the goals and policies in the Housing Element 85 of 638
11 a 9
to provide affordable housing. There is no evidence of state or federal laws being violated. Accordingly, this denial finding cannot be met. In addition to the three requested concessions, the applicant is requesting to use the Parking Concession in accordance with State Density Bonus Law. Per California Government Code section 65915(p), the project qualifies for reduced parking inclusive of guest and handicapped spaces, and tandem parking, and is required to provide 24 parking spaces for the residential units; the project is providing in excess of the requirement – a total of 36 parking spaces within a one-level semi-subterranean parking garage for the residents.

Since there is no substantial evidence to support any of the three findings for denial, the Council must grant the requested concessions (incentives).

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the action recommended in this report, other than the additional property tax or other revenue that may be generated if the Project is approved and ultimately developed in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Community Development Department staff have conducted environmental review for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and have determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental review under CEQA pursuant to section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines contained in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 32 “In-fill Development Projects” exemption) because the Project meets all of the conditions for an in-fill development project as follows, and as analyzed in detail with supporting evidence and technical studies in the attached Exhibit 5 (Class 32 Infill Exemption Analysis):
a) The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations;
b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban areas;
c) The Project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species;
d) Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and
e) The Project site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
86 of 638
12 a 9

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are set forth in the attached in Exhibit 6, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of the discretionary density bonus, with or without modifications or additional conditions.

Alternative 2: Deny the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of the discretionary density bonus.

Alternative 3: Any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Milca Toledo, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Yvette Neukian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Kristen Asp, Principal Planner
Michelle Yekikian, Senior Housing Project Manager
Aaron Brownell, Administrative Analyst
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Location Map
Exhibit 2: Project Plan
Exhibit 3: Draft Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Exhibit 4: Site and Neighborhood Photos
Exhibit 5: Class 32 Infill Exemption Analysis
Exhibit 6: Campaign Disclosure Form
87 of 638
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ________________ and seconded by Council Member _________________, that upon review and consideration of Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Case No. PDBP2212648 (“Density Bonus & IZO Housing Plan Case”), located at 424, 430 and 434 Milford Street, Glendale, CA 91203 (“Site”), and after having conducted a public hearing on said case pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (“GMC”), and receiving testimony, the City Council of the City of Glendale, California, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby APPROVES the Density Bonus & IZO Housing Plan Case for all of the reasons outlined in the April 11, 2023 staff report from the Director of Community Development, including any attachments thereto and any other evidence presented at the hearing, including any additional Council comments at the hearing, subject to the conditions below and pursuant to the facts and findings as follows:

The housing development project involves the demolition of five existing residential structures on site and the construction of a new, four-story, 43-unit multifamily residential project totaling 30,665 square feet, over a one-level, semisubterranean parking structure containing 36 residential parking spaces (“Project”).

Pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law, the Project will provide eight (8) affordable units reserved for very-low income households.

The City Council has reviewed and considered analysis and evidence to support that the Project is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines contained in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“Class 32 In-fill 88 of 638
Development Project”) and hereby approves such exemption, and finds that the Project meets all of the conditions of a Class 32 In-fill Development Project, as analyzed in detail with supporting evidence and technical studies in Exhibit 5 to the April 11, 2023 staff report.

This approval is based on the authority provided in State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Sections 65915, et seq.) and GMC Chapter 30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives), that allows an applicant that seeks and agrees to provide at least fifteen (15) percent of the units in a housing development to very low income households a mandatory fifty (50) percent density bonus, as well as three incentives.

Cal. Govt. Code § 65915(d)(2)(C) & f(2); GMC § 30.36.070(A)(3). State Density Bonus Law and the GMC also allow the City Council to grant or deny a discretionary density bonus above fifty (50) percent. Government Code Section 65915(n) states that “[i]f permitted by local ordinance, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a city . . . from granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this section . . .”.

Pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, an applicant may seek a density bonus in an amount greater than that required by State Density Bonus Law, which shall be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. (Ordinance No. 5966, Section 3(1)). The applicant is therefore eligible for the mandatory fifty (50) percent density bonus, but has requested a discretionary density bonus of one hundred fifty-two and nine tenths (152.9) of a 89 of 638
percent.

Based on the above, the City Council hereby finds and determines that it has considered factors including, but not limited to, the number and type of units, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. The Council finds that the number of affordable units proposed is sufficient in number, in unit type, in unit mix and in unit location, in comparison to the total number of units requested. The Council further finds that the underlying zone and neighborhood conditions and compatibility do support the requested discretionary density bonus. The Council also finds that the grant of the discretionary density bonus that would allow the project to be built would provide certain public benefits that include, but are not limited to: 1) the provision of affordable housing; and 2) the provision of market-rate housing.

These public benefits of the project support the grant of the discretionary density bonus.

The Council additionally determines that it cannot make any of the findings to deny the incentives/concessions requested, and therefore, must grant the incentives/ concessions, pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.080(A) because there is no evidence in the record that: (1) the incentive or concession does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents; (2) the incentive or concession will have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, or the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households; 90 of 638
and (3) the incentive or concession will be contrary to state or federal law. The Council hereby adopts and incorporates the findings set forth in the April 11, 2023 staff report from the Director of Community Development.

APPROVAL of this Density Bonus shall be subject to the following conditions:

1. That the development shall be in substantial accord with the plans submitted with the application and presented at the hearing except for any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

2. That all necessary permits shall be obtained from the Permit Services Center and all construction shall be in compliance with the Glendale Building and Safety Code and all other applicable regulations.

3. That the premises shall be maintained in a clean and orderly condition, free of weeds, trash and graffiti, both during construction and at all times thereafter.

4. That any expansion or modification of the facility or use shall require a new Density Bonus application. Expansion shall constitute adding of additional units, floor area, or any physical change as determined by the Director of Community Development.

5. That the applicant shall work with the City’s Community Development Department and the City Attorney’s Office to make any permissible or required amendments to the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan and to execute and record a Density Bonus Housing Agreement pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.140, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his designee and subject to approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. Such Density Bonus Housing 91 of 638
Agreement shall restrict the rental or sale of the required percentage of dwelling units in the housing development to persons or families of very-low income households identified in this approval. The applicant shall record such Density Bonus Housing Agreement prior to issuance of any and all required building permits.

6. That all affordable units shall be reasonably dispersed throughout the Project Site (e.g. throughout the different floors) and shall be comparable with the other dwelling units in the project in terms of appearance, finished quality and materials.

Subject to requested changes necessary to comply with health and safety standards approved by the Director of Community Development or his designee, the unit type, size and location of the affordable units shall be as approved by the City Council.

7. That the affordability term shall not start until the date of recordation of the Housing Notice of Completion. The applicant shall notify the City’s Housing Division at least six months prior to the anticipated date of the Certificate of Occupancy so that affordable units may be marketed in a timely manner.

8. That approval of the Design Review Board shall be obtained prior to applying for or obtaining permits.

9. That the premises shall be made available to any authorized City personnel (Fire, Police, Neighborhood Service, etc.) for inspection to ascertain that all conditions of approval of this Density Bonus application are complied with.

10. That the applicant shall comply with all Section/Department requirements as specified in their memos to the satisfaction of the City or Department Director.

These memos include but are not limited to Glendale Water and Power (September 27, 2022), Public Works Engineering (October 13, 2022), Traffic Engineering (November 3, 92 of 638
2022), and Maintenance Services/Urban Forester (November 29, 2022), Building and Safety Division (October 3, 2022), Community Development Housing Division (December 2, 2022) and Mobility Division (October 19, 2022), Community Services and Parking (September 26, 2022), and Fire Prevention Engineering (October 22, 2022).

11. That if any buildings, sidewalks, curb or gutter, fence or landscaping areas, etc., adjacent to the site are damaged during the course of construction on public or private property, the damage shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works for public property.

12. That any proposed exterior lighting shall be directed on the driveways, walkways and parking areas within the development and away from adjacent properties and the public-right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

13. That the applicant and/or the owner of the Site and/or real property located at 424, 430 and 434 W. Milford Street and any of their successors and/or assigns (collectively, “Developer”) agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and each of its agents, officers, council members, commissioners, attorneys, employees and representatives, with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City, from any claim, action or proceeding brought against the City to attack, set aside, void or annul any City land use approval for the Project located at 424, 430 and 434 Milford Street, Glendale, CA 91203. At its sole discretion, the City may participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the Developer of any obligation imposed by this condition. The Developer’s indemnity, defense and hold harmless obligations shall include, without limitation, payment of all 93 of 638
damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorney’s fees, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action or proceeding. In the event that a claim, action or proceeding referenced herein is brought, the City shall promptly notify the Developer of the existence of the claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of such claim, action or proceeding. As used herein, “land use approval” refers to decisions of the City approving requests for planning permits for the Project including, but not limited to, density bonus housing plans (including requests for density bonus, incentives and/or waivers), design review, general plan amendments, zone changes, zoning ordinance text amendments, tentative maps, vesting tentative maps, tentative parcel maps, reversions to acreage, final maps, final map modifications or amendments, time extensions, parcel map waivers, lot line adjustments, boundary line adjustments, certificates of compliance, conditional certificates of compliance, development agreements, conditional use permits, conditional use permit modifications, conditional use permit extensions, variances, variance modifications, precise plan of design, specific plans, sign permits, site plans, temporary use permits, any administrative or discretionary permit or any accompanying California Environmental Quality Act determinations pertaining to the type of approval referred to in this section, and any other similar approval. Notwithstanding the above, the Developer shall, within five (5) business days of this approval, execute a formal agreement with the City setting forth the above defense, indemnification and hold harmless provisions in substance.

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:
94 of 638
Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
95 of 638
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ________________ and seconded by Council Member _________________, that upon review and consideration of Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Case No. PDBP2212648 (“Density Bonus & IZO Housing Plan Case”), located at 424, 430 and 434 Milford Street, Glendale, CA 91203 (“Site”), and after having conducted a public hearing on said case pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (“GMC”), and receiving testimony, the City Council of the City of Glendale, California, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby DENIES the Density Bonus & IZO Housing Plan Case based on the following:

This denial is based on the authority provided in State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Sections 65915, et seq.) and the City’s Code, that allow the City Council to grant or deny a discretionary density bonus above fifty (50) percent.

Government Code Section 65915(n) states that “[i]f permitted by local ordinance, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a city . . . from granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this section . . .” . Pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, an applicant may seek a density bonus in an amount greater than that required by State Density Bonus Law, which shall be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. (Ordinance No. 5966, Section 3(1)) (emphasis added).
96 of 638
Based on the above, the City Council hereby finds and determines that it has considered factors including, but not limited to, the number and type of units, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. The Council finds that the number of affordable units proposed is not sufficient in number, in unit type, in unit mix or in unit location, in comparison to the total number of units requested, representing a 152.9 percent density bonus (17 units are allowed in the underlying zone but 26 bonus units are requested for a total of 43 units). The Council further finds that the underlying zone and neighborhood conditions and compatibility do not support the requested discretionary density bonus.

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
97 of 638

LOCATION MAP
SITE: 434,430,424 MILFORD ST.

SCALE: 1" = 200'
7 8
6 5
300' 300'
4 3 2-1 1 SITE 13 12 11 10 9
2-2
2-3
2-4
1-STORY RESIDENCE
2-STORY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
2-STORY MULTI-FAMILY
3-STORY MULTI-FAMILY
98 of 638
99 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE
ABOOLIA PROPOSED 4- STORY 43- N UNI T APARTMENT
434, 430, 424 MILFORD ST. GLENDALE, CA 91203

PROJECT DATA
PROJECT ADDRESS:434, 430, 424 MILFORD ST. GLENDALE, CA 91203 APN: 5637-020-011, 5637-020-012, 5637-020- 013 HOUSTON'S WEST GLENDALE TRACT LOT 28, LOT 29, LOT 30
43 UNIT APARTMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

ZONING: R-1650 (R-1320 FOR LOT WIDTH 90 FEET OR MORE)
LOT AREA:21,750 SF
(E) BUILDING INFO5 EXISTING UNITS WITH 11 BEDROOMS TOTAL (E) 2 - TWO BEDROOM UNITS @ 424 W. MILFORD
(E) 2 - TWO BEDROOM UNITS @ 430 W. MILFORD
(E) 1 - THREE BEDROOM UNITS ALLOWABLE BUILDING @ 430 W. MILFORD HEIGHT PER ZONE:

PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AND STORIES
RESIDENTIAL ZONE DENSITY: (BY RIGHT)
36 FEET MAX. WITH 3 STORIES
(ADDITIONAL 5 FEET IF 3:12)
59' - 7 3/8" (4 STORIES) *
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
1 UNIT PER 1,320 SF IF LOT WIDTH 90 FEET OR MORE
21,750 SF / 1,320 = 17 UNITS 818.249.5522
AFFORDABLE UNITS:17 + 50% = 25.50 = 26 UNITS
*
*

PROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS

PROPOSED NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE UNITS
43 UNITS
8 INCLUSIONARYUNITS (VERY LOW INCOME) WITH A TOTAL OF 9 BEDROOMS = (47% OF 17 UNITS) MAX. ALLOWABLE F.A.R.

PROPOSED FAR
21,750 SF X 1.0 = 21,750 SF
30,665 SF = 1.41
LEVEL 1
UNIT- 1
- 7,846 SF
LEVEL 2
UNIT- 12
- 7,846 SF
(1 BEDROO M)(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(2 BEDROO M)
(STUDIO )
728 SF
731 SF
729 SF
740 SF
739 SF
729 SF
742 SF
908 SF
600 SF
600 SF
600 SF
728 SF
731 SF
729 SF
740 SF
739 SF
729 SF
742 SF
908 SF
600 SF
600 SF
600 SF
UNIT- 2
UNIT- 3
UNIT- 4
UNIT- 5
UNIT- 6
UNIT- 7
UNIT- 8
UNIT- 9
UNIT- 10
UNIT- 11
UNIT- 13
UNIT- 14
UNIT- 15
UNIT- 16
UNIT- 17
UNIT- 18
UNIT- 19
UNIT- 20
UNIT- 21
UNIT- 22
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(2 BEDROO M)
(STUDIO)
*
*
*
*
(STUDI
*
O)
(STUDI O)
(STUDI O)(STUDI O) LEVEL 3
7,846 SF
LEVEL 4
7,127S
F UNIT- 23
UNIT- 24
UNIT- 25
UNIT- 26
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(2 BEDROO M)
(STUDIO )
728 SF
731 SF
729 SF
740 SF
UNIT- 34
UNIT- 35
UNIT- 36
UNIT- 37
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
740 SF
729 SF
740 SF
739 SF

PROJECT PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
UNIT- 27
UNIT- 28
UNIT- 29
UNIT- 30
UNIT- 31
739 SF
729 SF
742 SF
908 SF
600 SF
*
UNIT- 38
UNIT- 39
UNIT- 40
UNIT- 41
UNIT- 42
(1 BEDROO M)
(1 BEDROO M)
(2 BEDROO M)
(STUDIO)
729 SF
742 SF
908 SF
600 SF
600 SF
*
(STUDI *
AFFORDABL E UNIT O) *
UNIT- 32
UNIT- 33
(STUDI O)
600 SF
600 SF
UNIT- 43(STUDI O)600 SF 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203
(STUDI O)

MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
25% OF LOT AREA = 21,750 SF X 0.25 = 5,437.50 SF

VI CI NI TY
6,602 SF

MAP MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE
21,750 SF X 0.50 = 10,875 SF
10,860 SF
MINIMUM REQ'D PRIVATE OUTDOOR SPACE40 SF PER UNIT WITH MIN. LENGTH OR WIDTH OF 4'-0" PROPOSED PRIVATE OUTDOOR SPACE UNIT- 1
UNIT- 2
UNIT- 3
UNIT- 4
UNIT- 5
92 SF
78 SF
78 SF
78 SF
78 SF
UNIT- 12
UNIT- 13
UNIT- 14
UNIT- 15
UNIT- 16
53 SF
50 SF
50 SF
50 SF
52 SF
UNIT- 23
UNIT- 24
UNIT- 25
UNIT- 26
UNIT- 27
53 SF
50 SF
50 SF
50 SF
52 SF
UNIT- 34
UNIT- 35
UNIT- 36
UNIT- 37
UNIT- 38
50 SF
50 SF
50 SF
52 SF
50 SF
UNIT- 6
UNIT- 7
UNIT- 8
UNIT- 9
78 SF
78 SF
91 SF
67 SF
UNIT- 17
UNIT- 18
UNIT- 19
UNIT- 20
50 SF
50 SF
52 SF
45 SF
UNIT- 28
UNIT- 29
UNIT- 30
UNIT- 31
50 SF
50 SF
52 SF
45 SF
UNIT- 39
UNIT- 40
UNIT- 41
UNIT- 42
50 SF
52 SF
45 SF
45 SF
REVISIO UNIT- NS 10
UNIT- 11
67 SF
67 SF
UNIT- 21
UNIT- 22
45 SF
44 SF
UNIT- 32
UNIT- 33
45 SF
44 SF
UNIT- 4344 SF
PLOTTED REQ'D. COMMON DATE OUTDOOR SPACE - REQUIRED FOR 25 UNITS X 200 43 UNITS - 25 = 18 UNITS x 150
= 5,000 SF
= 2,700 SF
7,700 SF
1/26/2023 3:30:30 PM

SHEET PROPOSED COMMON TITLE OUTDOOR SPACE -
MINIMUM DIMENSION OF TEN (10) FEET AND A MINIMUM AREA OF TWO HUNDRED (200) SF 1ST LEVEL - 1,422 SF + 1,545 + 261 + 407 + 295 = 3,930 SF ROOF DECK - 2,453 + 2,355 = 4,808 SF 8,738 SF (1,038 SF MORE THAN REQUIRED) PROJECT
ZONING
DATA

REQ'D ADDITIONALOPEN SPACE- LOCATED WITHIN
50% OF THE LOT DEPTH NEAREST FRONT

PROPERTY LINE
150' - 90' = 60' 900 + (60 FT X 20) = 900 + 1,200 = 2,100 SF * PROPOSED ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE
NO. OF PARKING STALLS REQUIRED
NON
E
27 ONE BEDROOM UNITS - 27 X 0.5 = 13.50 STALLS
12 ALCOVE STUDIO UNITS - 12 X 0.5 = 6 STALLS
4 TWO BEDROOM UNITS - 4 X 1 = 4 STALLS

23.50 OR 24 STALLS .
. NO. OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED
NO. OF BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED
36 STALLS
11 ISSUE PHASE
.Project Status

ISSUE DATE

ITEMALLOWABLE / REQUIRED
21,750 SF X 1.0 = 21,750 SF
PROPOS
ED

CONCESSION /

INCENTIVES / WAIVER
CONCESSION 1. FLOOR AREA RATIO
30,665 SF = 1.41
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number 2. BUILDING HEIGHT AND NO. OF STORIES 36 FEET MAX. WITH 3 STORIES
(ADDITIONAL 5 FEET
IF 3:12)
59' - 7 3/8" (4 STORIES) CONCESS
ION

CONCESS
ION

DRAWN BY

3. ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR SPACE
150' - 90' = 60' NON 900 + (60 FT X 20) = 900 + E 1,200 = 2,100 SF SHEET NUMBER DT1.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 100 of 638
139' - 8" PREPARED FOR: 3,378.55SF / 139'- 8" = 24' - 2 1/4" ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N

NORT H SETBA
CK
20' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
23' - 0" REQ' DPROPOS ED
20' - 0 1/2"24'- 2 1/4"
SETBACK DIAGRAM (P1)
1/32" = 1'-0"
5 2,708 2,708 sf sf 124' - 2,928 0" sf
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020 124' - 0" 4340.35 SF / 124'-0" = 2,210 35' - 0 1/32" sf 2,210 sf 4340.13 SF / 124'-0" = 35' - 0" 818.249.5522 2,209 sf

PROPOS ED

SETBAC K
PROPOS
ED
SETBAC

PROPOS K
ED
SETBAC
K
PROPOS
ED
SETBAC
K
FAR DI AGRAM (4TH LEVEL)
1" = 20'-0"
FAR DIAGRAM (1ST - 3RD LEVEL)
1" = 20'-0"
8 7
124' - 0" 124' - 0" PROJECT 2700.38 SF / 124'-0" = 21' - 9 21/64" 2700.38 SF / 124'-0" = 21' - 9 21/64" PROPOSED 4-STORY
NORT H
REQ'D
SOUT H

NORT HSOUT H SETBA CK
23' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK SETBA CK
8' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
11' - 0"
SETBA
CK
20' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
23' - 0"
SETBA
CK
5' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
8' - 0" 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
26' - 0"
35' - 0"
REQ' D
REQ' D
REQ' D PROPOS ED 27' 6 1/2" PROPOS ED 11' - 0"
21' - 9 21/64"
PROPOS
ED
27' - 6 1/2"35' - 0 1/32" PROPOS
ED
11' - 0"21' - 9 21/64"

EAS T WES T
EAS
T WES 3' - 3 T 1/2" 2' - 6" 3' - UPPER LEVEL PROFILE 4" INCLUDING CANOPIES SETBA CK 8' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
11' - 0"

SETBA CK
8' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
11' - 0"
SETBA
CK
5' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
8' - 0"
SETBA
CK
5' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
8' - 0" 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203
REQ' D
REQ' D
REQ' D
REQ' DPROPOS ED 11' - 11 7/8" 20' - 2 9/16" PROPOS ED 14' - 0 3/8" 16' - 4"
PROPOS
ED
11' - 11 7/8"20' - 2 9/16" PROPOS
ED
14' - 0 3/8"16' - 4"
SETBACK DIAGRAM (2ND LEVEL)
1/32" = 1'-0"

SETBACK DIAGRAM
(1ST LEVEL)
1/32" = 1'-0"
2' - 6" 2 1
124' - 0"
124' - 0" 4340.13 SF / 124'-0" = 35' - 0" 5,066.53 SF / 124'- 0" = 40' - 10 5/16" 3' - 3' - 1" 1"

PROPOS ED

SETBAC K
PROPOS
ED
SETBAC
K

REVISIO PROPOS NS ED
PROPOS
ED 3' - 1" SETBA
CK

SETBA BALCO CK NY
SETBA
CK

BALCO NY

SETBA CK
PLOTTED DATE 1/19/2023 2:34:39 PM

SHEET TITLE
ZONING
DIAGRA
3' - 1"
M
124' - 0"
124' - 0"
2700.38 SF / 124'-0" = 21' - 9 21/64"
SOUTH
.
2700.38 SF / 124'-0" = 21' - 9 21/64"
. LOT COVERAGE = 10,860 SF NORT H

NORT HSOUT H

ISSUE PHASE SETBA
CK
23' - 0"
AVE. SETBACKSETBA
CK
11' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
14' - 0"

SETBA CK
23' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK SETBA CK
11' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
14' - 0"
.Project Status REQ' D
26' - 0"
35' - 0"
REQ' D
REQ' D26' - 0" REQ' D PROPOS
ED
27' - 6 1/2" PROPOS
ED
11' - 0"21' - 9 21/64"
ISSUE PROPOS ED DATE 27' - 6 1/2" 40' - 10 5/16" PROPOS ED 11' - 0" 21' - 9 21/64" EAS

T WEST EAS T WES T LOT COVERAGE DI AGRAM
1" = 20'-0"
SETBA
CK
11' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
14' - 0"
SETBA
CK
11' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
14' - 0"

SETBA CK
11' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
14' - 0"

SETBA CK
11' - 0"
AVE. SETBACK
14' - 0"
PROJECT 9 REQ' NUMBER D
REQ' D
REQ' DREQ' D Project Number PROPOS
ED
11' - 11 7/8"20' - 2 9/16"
PROPOS
ED
14' - 0 3/8"16' - 4" PROPOS ED 11' - 11 7/8" 20' - 2 9/16" PROPOS ED 14' - 0 3/8" 25' - 4 7/8" DRAWN BY SETBACKS DIAGRAM (4TH LEVEL)
1/32" = 1'-0"

SETBACK DIAGRAM
(3RD LEVEL)
1/32" = 1'-0"
4 3 SHEET NUMBER DT2.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 101 of 638
PREPARED 3' - 1 FOR: 1/8"
34' - 1 3/4"78' - 6 7/8"5' - 4" ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
31' - 8 11/16"47' - 0 7/8"
33' - 6 3/8"
20' - 3 1/2"
4' - 0"
3' - 14' - 0" 2" 4' - 5' - 6" 0" 9' - 6 1/4" 42' - 1"
28' - 0 1/2"
14' - 10"16' - 16' - 6 31/2" 3/4"
16' - 6 3/4"
18' - 7 1/4"4' - 0" 13' - 3"
2' - 0"
MIN. 18' - 7 407 1/4" SF
7' - 8"11' - 0"4' - 2' - 2" 0"
MIN. 261 SF
8' - 9 5/8" 6' - 20' - 2" 0" 1,422 SF 3' - 2,355 2" SF 2' - 2,453 6" SF 11' - 14' - 4" 10"
4' - 2"
10' - 20' - 0" 0"
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
8' - 4"
818.249.5522
6' - 10" 4' - 2" 14' - 10"
20' - 0"
14' - 2"
9' - DN 0" 78' - 2" 295 SF
4' - 1,545 4"
SF 4' - 2"
3' - 87' - 0" 0" 13' - 0" 14' - 10" 11' - 2"
4' - 8" 9'
- 4"
16' - 0"

COMMON OUTDOOR SPACE (ROOF DECK)
1" = 20'-0"
COMMON OUTDOOR SPACE (1ST LEVEL)
1" = 20'-0"
2' - 0" 4 3
1ST LEVEL - 1,422 + 1,545 + 261 + COMMON 407 + 295 = 3,930 SF OUTDOOR SPACE ROOF DECK - 2,453 + 2,355 = 4,808 SF8,738 SF TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA = 5,555 SF 7' - 6 5/16" 12' - 7"74' - 5"12' - 0"41' - 2" PROJECT PROPOSED 4-STORY 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
LANDSCAPE DI AGRAM 1/16" = 1'-0"
13' - 1 7/8" 13' - 2 1/4" 1
434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203
8' - 8"
TYP.
13' - 2 1/8" 13' - 0"
3' - UNIT - 6" 12
UNIT - 23
UNIT - 19 4' - 0 3/4" TYP. UNIT - 30
UNIT - 40
3' - 6"5' - 7"
TYP. 8' - 8"
UNIT - 16UNIT - 27
UNIT - 37
UNIT - 1
6' - 2" UNIT - 8
4' - 0 3/4" 4' - 0 3/4" UNIT - 20UNIT - 31UNIT - 41
4' - 0 3/4" UNIT -
UNIT - 5
13UNIT - 24UNIT - 34
5' - 10" 5' - 7"
TYP.
4' - 8"
6' - 2"
10' - 0"
TYP.

UNIT - UNIT - 9
17UNIT - 28UNIT - 38
4' - 0 3/4" UNIT - 2

REVISIO

NS UNIT -
4' - 0 21
3/4" UNIT - 32UNIT - 42
UNIT - 6
4' - 4" 10' - 0"
PLOTTED 4' - 0 DATE 3/4" TYP. 1/19/2023 2:34:45 PM 4' - 8" 6' - 2"
UNIT - 10
UNIT - 11
UNIT - 14UNIT - 25UNIT - 35
SHEET 5' - TITLE 10"
4' - 4"
4' - 0 3/4" UNIT - UNIT - 3
22 UNIT - 33
UNIT - 43
ZONING
DIAGRA
M
UNIT - 18
UNIT - 29
UNIT - 39
UNIT - 7 SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIO N
4' - 0 3/4" 4' - 8"
UNIT - 15UNIT - 26UNIT - 36
DN UNIT - 4
4' - 4"
. TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA = 1,047 SF . LANDSCAPE DIAGRAM
(ROOF DECK)
1/16" = 1'-0"
ISSUE PHASE 2 .Project Status

ISSUE DATE
PRI VATE OUTDOOR SPACE (2ND-4TH LEVEL)
1/16" = 1'-0"
PRI VATE OUTDOOR SPACE (1ST LEVEL)
1" = 20'-0"
PROJECT NUMBER 6 5 PLANTING AREA
Project Number
LANDSCAPED AREA (1ST LEVEL) - 5,555 SF
LANDSCAPED AREA (ROOF DECK) - 1,047 SF
DRAWN 6,602 BY PLANTING AREA SF COUNTED TOWARDS LANDSCAPED AREA (2 FT MINIMUM WIDTH) SHEET NUMBER DT2.
1 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 102 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN 150' - 0 3/16"
13' - 9 13/16" 30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0"34' - 0"11' - 6 3/8" (E) WATER METER TO BE

REMOVED / ABANDONED
17' - 6" PROVIDE 5 NEW 24" BOX HOLLY OAK TREES ALONG
PARKWAY SPACED AT 27 FT ON CENTER. 2 EXISTING

STREET TREES WILL BE REMOVED

SHADED AREA INDICATES (E) DRIVEWAYS TO

BE REPLACED WITH NEW CURB AND

LANDSCAPE
(N) CONCRETE APRON
521.88' TC. INT. 29' - 7" 27' - 0"

TYPICAL TREE SPACING

FRONT AVERAGE
GRADE @ 522.74'
523.61' TC
(E) TREE TO BE REPLACED 12' - 0" (E) TREE TO BE REPLACED N 89°40'00 "E 150.0 2'
SLOPED WALK. 5%MAXIMUM
SLOPE. NO RAILINGS

5.00%
+1'-2" HIGH WALL
TAPERING TO 0
523.93 LANDSC APE LANDSC APE 524.52 FS 523.93 FS BACKFLOWPRE VENTION

DEVICE LOCATION
525.10 523.93 TW TW 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
14' - 14' - 2 0" 1/8" 525.10 TW
523.93 FS523.93 TW 818.249.5522 STAIR RAILING BENC H DN 525.68 FS PATI O

LANDSC APE LANDSC APE PATI DN O

LANDSC FDC LOCATION APE

FIRE DN
RISE R
525.66 F.F. PODIUM LOWEST POINT ELEVATION @ 522.07'

FACP LOCATION
DN
PATI O PROPOSED 2- SETBACK STOR Y
BLD G.

PROPOSED SETBACK LANDSC APE
3-STOR
Y
BLD G.

PROJECT PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
PROPOSED 4 STORY PATI O COURTY ARD
PATI
PATI O 43 UNI T O APARTMENT
525.68 F.F. ELEVATION 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203
PATI O
PATI O
PATI O
PATI

LANDSC O
APE
UP

FIRE PATI O RISER REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED SECOND FLOOR DATE PROFILE DN 1/19/2023 2:33:27 PM BBQ SHEET TITLE 13' - LANDSCAPE 0"
S 89°40'00" E
LANDSC

APE PLOT
150.0 3' (E) POWER
PLAN

POLE REQ'D SIDE SETBACK
(1ST LEVEL) (E) POWER NOT POLE E:(E) DRIVEWAY THAT IS NOT USED WILL BE REPLACED WITH

PARKWAY, STANDARD CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK PER
CITY REQUIREMENT.

REQ'D SIDE SETBACK
(1ST LEVEL)
.
.
14' - 4 5/16" 30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0"34' - 0"11' - 0 1/16" ISSUE PHASE 150' - 0 3/8"
.Project Status

ISSUE DATE

PLOT PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
PROJECT NUMBER 1 Project Number 0' 10' 20' 40' NOR
TH

DRAWN BY
SHEET NUMBER DA1.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 103 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
150' - 0 3/16"
13' - 9 13/16" 30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 34' - 0"11' - 6 3/8" 17' - 6" PROVIDE 5 NEW 24" BOX HOLLY OAK TREES ALONG
PARKWAY SPACED AT 27 FT ON CENTER. 2 EXISTING

STREET TREES WILL BE REMOVED

SHADED AREA INDICATES (E) DRIVEWAYS TO

BE REPLACED WITH NEW CURB AND

LANDSCAPE
(N) CONCRETE APRON
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN
(E) WATER METER TO BE
521.88' TC. INT. SLOPED WALK. 5%MAXIMUM SLOPE. NO RAILINGS 29' - 7" 27' - REMOVED / 0" ABANDONEDTYPICAL TREE SPACING FRONT AVERAGE GRADE @ 522.74'
523.61' TC
(E) TREE TO BE REPLACED 12' - 0" (E) TREE TO BE REPLACED N 89°40'00 "E 150.0 2'

5.00%

LANDSC APE BACKFLOWPRE VENTION
DEVICE LOCATION 14' - 2 1/8"
LANDSC APE 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
14' - Montrose, CA 91020 0" 818.249.5522
BENC H
PATI O

LANDSC APE LANDSC APE PATI DN O

LANDSC FDC LOCATION APE

FIRE DN
RISE R
525.66 F.F. PODIUM LOWEST POINT ELEVATION @ 522.07'

FACP LOCATION
DN
LANDSC PATI O APE PROPOSED SETBACK PROPOSED 2- SETBACK STOR Y BLD G.
2' - 6"
3-STOR
Y
BLD G.

PROJECT PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
PROPOSED 4 STORY
43 UNIT APARTMENTPATI
O

PATI O COURTY ARD PATI O
525.68 F.F. ELEVATION 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203 PATI O
PATI O
PATI O
PATI

LANDSC O
APE
UP

FIRE RISER

REVISIO PATI NS O
PLOTTED DATE 1/19/2023 2:33:29 PM
DN

SHEET TITLE

COLORED

PLOT PLAN

LANDSC APE LANDSC APE
S 89°40'00" E150.0 3'

REQ'D SIDE SETBACK
(1ST LEVEL)
(E) POWER POLE (E) POWER POLE
. REQ'D SIDE SETBACK
(1ST LEVEL)
.
14' - 4 5/16" 30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 34' - 0"11' - 0 1/16"

ISSUE PHASE
150' - 0 .Project Status 3/8"

ISSUE DATE
PROJECT 0' 10' 20' 40' NOR NUMBER TH
Project Number COLORED PLOT PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"
1 DRAWN BY
SHEET NUMBER DA1.
1 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 104 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
* AFFORDABL E UNITS N UNIT
- 7
UNIT
- 8
1 3 1 D- D- A4.0 A4.0 D- A4.0
6' - 1 1/8" 24' - 2 7/8" 5' - 0"30' - 4"25' - 0"30' - 0"3' - 4" REQ'D SETBACK

REQ'D SETBACK
144' - 5 13/16" 6 3/8"
7' - 0 15/16" 12' - 10" 124' - 6 7/8"

PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
STORAGE - 90 CU.FT. MIN REQUIRED PER UNIT
PROVIDED = 3' X 8' X 6' = 144 CU FT. PER UNIT 3' - 0"
TYP. STORAGE DEPTH
10' - 6" 8' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0"
ELECTRIC METERS 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020 1
18' - 818.249.5522
0" PATI ELE O C
PATI TYP. STALL LENGTH O
23 22 7
12' - 0" UP DN 18' - 0" KITCH DRIVEWAY WIDTH 4' - 0" EN TYP.

UNIT - 1 H.C. BR 1 VAN TYP. STALL LENGTH LIVING/DIN 7' - 8" 1 ING BEDROO M 728 SF
8 UNIT
- 8 LIVING/DIN ING 2 BEDROO
*
M
908 SF
36 35 4' - 0"
TYP.

UP
BATH W/D ELE W/D 1 ELE V 9 V
34 2
3 UNIT
- 5 BEDRO OM BAT H

KITCH ENKITCH
EN
BR 2
10 11
39 38
1 BEDROO M
739 SF

LIVING/DIN
ING
PATI O
BATH 2 2' - 3" LON GTER M
25' - 0" W/D

BICYC LE

STORA GE

WIC KITCH BAT H EN UNIT
- 9 BEDRO OM W/D ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
4' - 0"
TYP.
4 5
6 BEDRO BAT OM H WIC UNIT W/D
- 2 37
36 35
12 13
14 LIVING
/

DININ G
BAT H
BAT H
BAT H

PATI SLEEPI NG O
AREA 1 BEDROO M
731 SF
UNIT
- 6 PATI O
PATI O
PATI O
LIVING/DIN ING 13' - 7" KITCH GAS METERS KITCH EN PROJECT EN 1 BEDROO M
729 SF STORA GE PROPOSED
4-STORY
41 40
42 43

LIVING/DIN
ING
PATI O
KITCH
EN 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
RECYC LE 30 29 W/D 2 4' - 2 WIC W/D
0"
TYP.
26' - 1" BAT H COURTY D- A4.0 D- A4.0 ARD BEDRO OM UNIT - PATI10
O 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

BEDRO OM ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
1 LIVING
/

DININ G
18' - 0" BAT H SLEEPI NG
AREA TYP. STALL WIC

LENGTH UNIT W/D
34 15 - 3
16 17
1 BEDROO M
729 SF
UNIT LIVING/DIN ING KITCH EN - 71 BEDROO
*
M
742 SF

KITCH EN KITCH LIVING/DIN EN ING
PATI O UNIT - 11 33
32 W/D ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF W/D 3 13 1' - 0"
TYP.

WIC BAT BEDRO H OM LIVING
/

DININ G
PATI O
10' - 6" 17' - 0"
2 STD STALLS @8' -6"
17' - 0" 17' - 0"
2 STD STALLS @8' -6"
1' - 6" 8' - 6" 10' - 6" SLEEPI NG
AREA
18' - 0" 18' - 2 STD STALLS @8' -6" 8" BEDRO BAT OM H WIC 4 12 W/D
UP 31
4' - 0" LIVING/DIN TRAS ING UP H KITCH STORA EN GE REVISIO NS
30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 DN
PLOTTED DATE 1/26/2023 3:24:53 PM

SHEET TITLE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE FLOOR
PLANS UNIT - 4 5' - 0"
30' - 4"25' - 0"30' - 1 0" BEDROO M
740 SF 5' - 4 7/16" 139' - 7 7/8" 5' - 0 1/16"
.
.

ISSUE PHASE P1- SUBTERRANEAN
.Project Status PARKING PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
1ST LEVEL PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
2 1 NOR TH

ISSUE DATE
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number
DRAWN 0' 10' 20' 40' BY
SHEET NUMBER DA2.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 105 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
D1 D- A4.0
1 * AFFORDABL E UNITS N
A4.0 UNIT - 14
UNIT - 16UNIT - 20UNIT - 29UNIT - 32
6' - 1 5/8" 24' - 2 3/8" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0" 3' - 4" 6' - 1 5/8" 24' - 2 3/8" 5' - 0"30' - 4"25' - 0"30' - 0"3' - 4" REQUIRED 2ND LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
REQUIRED 3RD LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
REQUIRED 2ND LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
UNIT - 30
2 BEDROOM
908 SF
UNIT - 19
2 BEDROOM
908 SF
3' - 4" 6' - 0"
3' - 2' - 6" 4" 2' - 6" 2' - 6"
2' - 6" 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
818.249.5522
BALC
. BALC. BALC. BALC.

OPEN TO
BELO W

OPEN TO

BELO W KITCH EN KITCH EN OPEN TO
BELO W

OPEN TO
BELO W
BR 1 BR 1

LIVING/DIN INGLIVING/DIN UNIT -
ING 23 LIVING/DIN ING LIVING/DIN
1 ING

BEDROO M
728 SF
UP DN UP DN BATH 1 BATH W/D W/D UNIT - W/D W/D 1 121 BEDROO M 728 SF UNIT - 16
1 BEDROOM
739 SF
BEDRO OM BAT HKITCH EN UNIT - 27
1 BEDROOM
739 SF
KITCH EN BR 2 BEDRO OM BAT HKITCH EN
*
KITCH
EN
BR 2
BALC
. BALC LIVING/DIN .

ING BATH 2

LIVING/DIN
ING
BATH 2

W/D W/D
WIC UNIT - 31 KITCH WIC
EN
KITCH

BEDRO BAT H
BAT H EN OM BEDRO OM UNIT - 20

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
*

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
W/D
W/D
W/D
W/D

BEDRO OMBEDRO BAT OM H

BAT WIC H WIC W/D W/D LIVING /

DININ G
UNIT - 13
LIVING
/

DININ G
BAT H
BAT H
BAT H
BALC
. BAT H
BAT H
BAT H
BALC
. SLEEPI NG
AREA

SLEEPI NG
1 AREA BEDROO M
731 SF
BALC
. LIVING/DIN ING BALC. LIVING/DIN UNIT - ING 24
1 BEDROOM
731 SF

KITCH EN KITCH EN PROJECT KITCH EN KITCH EN OPEN TO
BELO W

PROPOSED
4-STORY

LIVING/DIN ING BALC
. OPEN TO
BELO W

LIVING/DIN
ING
BALC
. KITCH EN
KITCH
EN 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
W/D W/D 2 WIC 2 WIC W/D BAT H
BAT D- H A4.0 BEDRO OM D- A4.0 BEDRO UNIT - OM 28
1 BEDROOM
729 SF
UNIT - 21

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
UNIT - *
UNIT - 14 17 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

BEDRO OMBEDRO LIVING / OM

DININ G
1 BEDROO M
729 SF
LIVING
/

DININ G

BAT HBAT SLEEPI NG H
AREA
BALC
. SLEEPI NG
AREA
BALC
. 1 BEDROO M
729 SF

WIC UNIT - WIC
32 *

W/D W/D

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF UNIT - 18 UNIT - 25
1 BEDROOM
729 SF
LIVING/DIN ING LIVING/DIN BALC ING . KITCH EN BALC
. KITCH KITCH EN EN KITCH KITCH EN EN 1 BEDROO M
742 SF

KITCH LIVING/DIN EN ING BALC
.

LIVING/DIN
ING
BALC
. W/D
W/D W/D UNIT - 22

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF

WIC WIC BAT H
BAT BEDRO H OM BEDRO UNIT - OM 29 LIVING /

DININ G
LIVING
/
DININ
*
G

SLEEPI NG
AREA
BALC
. SLEEPI NG
AREA
BALC
.
4' - 7"
UNIT - 33

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
1 BEDROO M
742 SF

BEDRO OMBEDRO BAT OM H

BAT WIC H WIC
W/D UNIT - 15
1 BEDROOM
740 SF
W/D UNIT - 26
1 BEDROOM
740 SF

UP DN UP DN
BALC
.

LIVING/DIN ING BALC
.

LIVING/DIN ING KITCH EN KITCH EN

REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED DATE 1/26/2023 3:24:57 PM

SHEET TITLE
FLOOR
30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0" 5' - 0"30' - 4"25' - 0"30' - 0" PLANS .
. 3RD LEVEL PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
2ND LEVEL PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
2 1 ISSUE PHASE
.Project Status NOR TH

ISSUE DATE
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number
DRAWN 0' 10' 20' 40' BY
SHEET NUMBER DA2.
1 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 106 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
D1 * AFFORDAB LE UNI T N
A4.0 UNIT - 38
6' - 1 5/8" 24' - 2 3/8" 5' - 0"30' - 4"25' - 0"30' - 0"3' - 4" REQ'D 4TH LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
REQ'D 4TH LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
UNIT - 402 BEDROO M
908 SF
3' - 4" 2' - 6"
2' - 2' - 6" 6"
EAV E
3' - 4"
EAV E
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020 2' - 6"
818.249.5522
BALC CANOPY . ABOVE

OPEN TO
BELO W

OPEN TO

BELO OPEN TO W
BELO W
BR 1
LIVING/DIN 5' - 0" ING
EAV E

DN ROO F
DEC K
UP DN BATH ELE W/D 1 V
UNIT - 37
1 BEDROOM
739 SF

KITCH ENKITCH
EN
BR 2
BALC LIVING/DIN .

ING
BATH 2
W/D
WIC KITCH BAT H EN UNIT - 41 BEDRO
3' - 1" OM
EAV E
W/D
W/D
W/D

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
BEDRO BAT OM H WIC W/D UNIT - 34

SLEEPI NG
AREA
LIVING
/

DININ G
BAT H
BAT H
BAT H
BALC ROOF . DECK ROOF DECK 1 BEDROO M
740 SF

EQUIPM ENT

SCREENI NG -

COMMON AREA COMMON AREA BALC
. LIVING/DIN ING KITCH KITCH EN PROJECT OPEN EN TO
BELO W

OPEN TO
BELO W

PROPOSED
4-STORY

LIVING/DIN
ING
BALC
. 1' - 6"

PLASTERED WALL KITCH
EN 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
W/D 2 2 WIC BAT D- H A4.0 D- A4.0 BEDRO OM UNIT - 38
1 BEDROOM
729 SF
* UNIT - 42 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

BEDRO OM LIVING
/

DININ G
BAT H

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF

SLEEPI NG
AREA
BALC WIC . UNIT - 35
W/D
1 BEDROO M
729 SF
3' - 8" LIVING/DIN BALC
.

ING KITCH KITCH EN EN KITCH LIVING/DIN EN ING
BALC AC . UNITS AC UNITS UNIT - 39 W/D UNIT - 43 SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIO N

WIC BAT H
1 BEDROO M
742 SF

BEDRO OM

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
LIVING
/

DININ G

SLEEPI NG
AREA
BALC
. BEDRO AC OM UNITS BAT H WIC UNIT - 36 W/D
DN UP DN 1 BEDROO M
740 SF
BALC
.

LIVING/DIN ING KITCH EN

REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED DATE 2' - 6"
EAV E
1/26/2023 3:25:00 PM

SHEET TITLE
FLOOR
PLANS 1 30' - 4" 5' - 0"
30' - 4"25' - 0"30' - D- 0" A4.0
. ROOF DECK PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
. 1 4TH LEVEL PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"
2 ISSUE PHASE
.Project Status NOR TH

ISSUE DATE
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number
DRAWN 0' 10' 20' 40' BY
SHEET NUMBER DA2.
2 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 107 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
11 3 6 15 12 14 7 8 16 1 11 2 2

ELEVATION KEYNOTES

ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.6
8 SMOOTH TROWEL CEMENT FINISH ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.1
8 1 PAINT COLOR - WARM WHITE BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEW380)
SMOOTH TROWEL 2 CEMENT FINISH
3 4

TOP OF PARAPET
HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)

HARDIE PANELS BY JAMES HARDIE ARRANGED IN RANDOM SIZES

FINISH - SMOOTH
PAINT COLOR - TRANQUIL TEAL BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5703)

ROOF DECK
567.6
BURNISHED CONCRETE MASONRY 8 BLOCKS IN STACK BOND
NATURAL CONCRETE FINISH 5
6 7
8 4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 PRIMED AND PAINTED WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369) 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A Montrose, CA 91020 PERFORATED CORRUGATED METAL PANELS BY HENDRICK OR APPROVED EQUAL PAINT COLOR - (TO MATCH NORTHERN TERRITORY BY DUNN EDWARDS) 818.249.5522
3RD LEVEL
546.6
8 PAINTED STEEL STAIR STRINGERS PAINT COLOR - PESTO BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5474) 9 METAL ADDRESS NUMBERS - BACKLIT
2ND LEVEL
536.1
8 PRIMED AND PAINTED STEEL GATE WITH PERFORATED METAL
PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)
10 11
12 COMPOSITE WINDOWS AND PATIO DOORS BY KOLBE. (FORGENT SERIES)

PRIMED AND PAINTED WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL WITH

PERFORATED METAL SHEETS
PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)
1ST LEVEL
525.68
1ST LEVEL
525.6
8 SMOOTH TROWEL CEMENT FINISH 523.61' 13 TC
14 LOWEST POINT
522.0
7 PAINT COLOR - PESTO BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5474) PODIUM LEVEL @ 525.66' FRONT AVERAGE GRADE @ 522.74'

FRONT AVERAGE GRADE
522.74
521.88' TC.

INT. 4 9 10 3 5 4 12
PAINTED STEEL STAIRS, POSTS AND BEAMS PAINT COLOR - NORTHERN TERRITORY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA158) NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" PRIMED AND PAINTED 1
15 STEEL POSTS
16 PAINT COLOR - RED CONTRAST BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA106)

PROJECT PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
PRIMED AND PAINTED 4 2 1 2 11 2 11 2 3
METAL NUMBERS PAINT COLOR - RED CONTRAST BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA106)

ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.6
8 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.1
8 TOP OF
HIGHEST PT. OF PARAPET

THE BUILDING
571.1 ROOF 8 DECK
567.6
8 4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 REVISIO
NS
3RD LEVEL
546.6
8 PLOTTED DATE 1/19/2023 2:33:47 PM

SHEET TITLE
ELEVA
TIONS
2ND LEVEL
536.1
8 1ST LEVEL
525.68
1ST LEVEL
525.6
8 .
.

LOWEST POINT
522.0
7 ISSUE PHASE FRONT AVERAGE GRADE
522.74
12 13 6 4 .Project Status

ISSUE DATE EAST ELEVATIO N
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 PROJECT NUMBER Project Number

DRAWN BY
0' 10' 20' 40'
SHEET NUMBER DA3.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 108 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
12 11 2 7 1 1 2 15 3 8 2 1

ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.6 ELEVATOR 8 CANOPY
578.1
8 ELEVATION KEYNOTES SMOOTH TROWEL 1 CEMENT FINISH TOP OF PARAPET HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 PAINT COLOR - WARM WHITE BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEW380)
SMOOTH TROWEL 2 CEMENT FINISH
3 4

ROOF DECK
567.6
8 PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)

HARDIE PANELS BY JAMES HARDIE ARRANGED IN RANDOM SIZES

FINISH - SMOOTH
PAINT COLOR - TRANQUIL TEAL BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5703) BURNISHED CONCRETE MASONRY BLOCKS IN STACK BOND

NATURAL CONCRETE FINISH
4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 5
6 7
8 PRIMED AND PAINTED WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY Montrose, CA 91020 DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369) 3RD LEVEL 546.6
8 818.249.5522

PERFORATED CORRUGATED METAL PANELS BY HENDRICK OR APPROVED EQUAL PAINT COLOR - (TO MATCH NORTHERN TERRITORY BY DUNN EDWARDS) PAINTED STEEL STAIR STRINGERS PAINT COLOR - PESTO BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5474) 2ND LEVEL
536.1
8 9 METAL ADDRESS NUMBERS - BACKLIT

FENCE PRIMED AND PAINTED STEEL GATE LINE WITH PERFORATED METAL PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)
10 11
12 1ST LEVEL
525.6
8 COMPOSITE WINDOWS AND PATIO DOORS BY KOLBE. (FORGENT SERIES)

LOWEST POINT
522.0
7 PRIMED AND PAINTED WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL WITH

PERFORATED METAL SHEETS
PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)
12 4

SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
SMOOTH TROWEL 13 CEMENT FINISH 1
14 PAINT COLOR - PESTO BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5474)
PAINTED STEEL STAIRS, POSTS AND BEAMS PAINT COLOR - NORTHERN TERRITORY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA158) PRIMED AND PAINTED 15 STEEL POSTS
16 PAINT COLOR - RED CONTRAST BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA106)
PROJECT 14 7 8 15 1 2 11 2 6 1 11 PROPOSED
4-STORY 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
PRIMED AND PAINTED METAL NUMBERS PAINT COLOR - RED CONTRAST BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA106) ELEVATOR HEADROOM 581.6 ELEVATOR 8 CANOPY
578.1
8 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

TOP OF PARAPET
HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 ROOF DECK
567.6
8 4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 REVISIO 3RD NS LEVEL
546.6
8 PLOTTED DATE 1/19/2023 2:33:56 PM

SHEET TITLE
ELEVA
TIONS
2ND LEVEL
536.1
FENCE 8
LINE
1ST LEVEL
525.6
8 . LOWEST POINT
522.0
7 .

ISSUE PHASE 4 5 3 13 2 .Project Status

ISSUE WEST
DATE

ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 PROJECT NUMBER Project Number

DRAWN BY
SHEET 0' 10' 20' 40' NUMBER DA3.
1 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 109 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
2 15 11 2 2 1 11 13 2 12 7 N

ELEVATION KEYNOTES

ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.6
8 SMOOTH TROWEL CEMENT FINISH ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.1
8 1 PAINT COLOR - WARM WHITE BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEW380)
SMOOTH TROWEL 2 CEMENT FINISH
3 4

TOP OF PARAPET
HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)

HARDIE PANELS BY JAMES HARDIE ARRANGED IN RANDOM SIZES

FINISH - SMOOTH
PAINT COLOR - TRANQUIL TEAL BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5703)

ROOF DECK
567.6 BURNISHED CONCRETE MASONRY BLOCKS IN STACK BOND 8

NATURAL CONCRETE FINISH
14 5
6 7
8 4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 PRIMED AND PAINTED WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)

PERFORATED CORRUGATED METAL PANELS BY HENDRICK OR APPROVED EQUAL PAINT COLOR - (TO MATCH NORTHERN TERRITORY BY DUNN EDWARDS) 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020 3RD LEVEL
546.6
8 818.249.5522
PAINTED STEEL STAIR STRINGERS PAINT COLOR - PESTO BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5474) 9 METAL ADDRESS NUMBERS - BACKLIT
2ND LEVEL
536.1
8 PRIMED AND PAINTED STEEL GATE WITH PERFORATED METAL
PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)
10 11
12 COMPOSITE WINDOWS AND PATIO DOORS BY KOLBE. (FORGENT SERIES)

PRIMED AND PAINTED WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL WITH

PERFORATED METAL SHEETS
PAINT COLOR - LEGENDARY GRAY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE6369)
1ST LEVEL
525.6 LOWEST 8 POINT
522.0
7 SMOOTH TROWEL 13 CEMENT FINISH
14 PAINT COLOR - PESTO BY DUNN EDWARDS (DE5474)
PAINTED STEEL STAIRS, POSTS AND BEAMS 6 5 8 4
PAINT COLOR - NORTHERN TERRITORY BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA158) PRIMED AND PAINTED 15 STEEL POSTS
16 COURTYARD ELEVATION (EAST)
1/8" = 1'-0"
PAINT COLOR - RED CONTRAST BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA106) 1
PRIMED AND PAINTED METAL NUMBERS PROJECT PAINT COLOR - RED CONTRAST BY DUNN EDWARDS (DEA106) PROPOSED 4-STORY 43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
6 3 16 12 1 11 13 14 15

ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.6
8 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.1
8 TOP OF PARAPET
HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 ROOF DECK
567.6
8 4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED DATE 3RD LEVEL
546.6
8 1/19/2023 2:34:05 PM

SHEET TITLE
ELEVA
2ND LEVEL TIONS
536.1
8 .
1ST
. LEVEL
525.68
1ST LEVEL
525.6
8 ISSUE PHASE LOWEST POINT
522.0
7 .Project Status

ISSUE DATE
4 5 COURTYARD ELEVATION (WEST)
1/8" = 1'-0"
PROJECT NUMBER 2 Project Number

DRAWN BY
SHEET NUMBER DA3.
2 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 110 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N

ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.6 ELEVATOR 8 CANOPY
578.18

ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.1
8 SOLAR PANEL LOCATION AC UNITS TOP OF PARAPET
HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 TOP OF SCREENING
572.02

ROOF DECK
567.68
UNIT 39 UNIT 38 UNIT 37
4TH LEVEL
557.18
UNIT 29 UNIT 28 UNIT 27
3RD LEVEL
546.68
2ND LEVEL
536.1 8
UNIT 18 UNIT 17 UNIT 16 ADJACE NT 2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A Montrose, CA 91020 PROPERTY 2ND FENCE
LEVEL
536.18
818.249.5522
1ST LEVEL
525.6 8 UNIT 7 UNIT 6 UNIT 5
1ST LEVEL
525.68 P1- SUBTERRANEAN PARKING
513.8 5

LOWEST POINT
522.0
7 LOWEST POINT ±
5'-7" BELOW

PODIUM LEVEL
5' - 0"
5 FT MIN. 5 FT MIN.

3.75% 5.36%
7' - 0" 50' - 2 3/4"

14.99%
7' - 0"
5 FT MIN.

5.36%
P1- SUBTERRANEAN PARKING RAMP 513.85

SECTION
3/32" = 1'-0"
3 BURNISHED CONCRETE

MASONRY BLOCKS IN
STACK BOND SECTI ON A 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 ELEVATOR HEADROOM
581.68

PROJECT PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT

ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.18

ELEVATOR CANOPY
578.1
8 TOP OF PARAPET

TOP OF PARAPET
HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.1
8 HIGHEST PT. OF THE BUILDING
571.18 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

ROOF DECK
567.6
8 UNIT 35 UNIT 38 UNIT 42
4TH LEVEL
557.1
8 UNIT 25 UNIT 28 UNIT 32
3RD LEVEL
546.6
8 BURNISHED CONCRETE

MASONRY BLOCKS IN

STACK BOND

BURNISHED CONCRETE

MASONRY BLOCKS IN

STACK BOND

REVISIO
NS UNIT 14 UNIT 17 UNIT 21
UNIT 10

ADJACENT PROPERTY
FENC E
PLOTTED 2ND DATE LEVEL
536.1
8 1/19/2023 2:34:07 PM

SHEET ADJACENT TITLE PROPERTY
FENCE WALL UNIT 3 UNIT 6 SECTI
1ST LEVEL ONS
525.6 LOWEST 8 POINT
522.07
STO. STO. STO. STO. STO.
. LOWEST POINT 5'-6 1/2"

FROM PODIUM
RECYC LE . P1- SUBTERRANEAN PARKING
513.8
5 ISSUE PHASE
.Project Status
ISSUE STORAGE - 90 DATE CU.FT. MIN

REQUIRED PER UNIT
PROVIDED = 3' X 8' X 6' =
144 CU FT. PER UNIT

PROJECT SECTI
NUMBER ON B 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 Project Number

DRAWN BY
SHEET 0' 10' 20' 40' NUMBER DA4.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 111 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
818.249.5522

NORTHEAST EXTERIOR VIEWNORTHWEST EXTERIOR VIEW

PROJECT PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED DATE 1/19/2023 2:34:18 PM

SHEET TITLE
3D
VIEW
S
.

INTERIOR COURTYARD VIEWINTERIOR VIEW FROM WALKWAY
.

ISSUE PHASE
.Project Status

ISSUE DATE
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number

DRAWN BY
SHEET NUMBER DA5.
0 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 112 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
818.249.5522

VIEW FROM ROOF DECKVIEW FROM ROOF DECK PROJECT PROPOSED 4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED DATE 1/19/2023 2:34:29 PM

SHEET TITLE
3D
VIEW
S
.
.

ISSUE NORTHWEST

PHASE AERIAL VIEW
SOUTHEAST AERIAL VIEW .Project Status

ISSUE DATE
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number

DRAWN BY
SHEET NUMBER DA5.
1 c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 113 of 638
PREPARED FOR: ANDRE

ABOOLIA
N
2255 Honolulu Ave. 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
818.249.5522
2272 FEET PEDESTRIAN DISTANCE Metro Bus StopRoute #92
PROJECT Future BRT Stop NoHo- Pasadena Route

PROPOSED
4-STORY
43-UNIT

APARTME
NT
1614 FEET PEDESTRIAN DISTANCE 434,430,424 MILFORD ST
GLENDALE, CA 91203

REVISIO
NS
PLOTTED DATE 1/26/2023 10:00:54
AM Metro Bus Stop Route #94

SHEET TITLE
Bus
Route
Map
MTA Bus Stop Route #501
.
.

ISSUE PHASE
.Project Status
ISSUE DATE 0 200' 500' 100 0'
PROJECT NUMBER Project Number

DRAWN BY

SHEET NUMBER
-
c 2021 Malekian and Associates, Inc. reserves its common law copyright and other property rights in these plans. These plans are not to be reproduced, altered or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without first obtaining the express written permission and consent of Malekian and Associate, Inc. 114 of 638

PALO VERDE TREE
PATI O
PATI O
R
UNIT UNIT - 8 - 1
1 2 - 3 1 - 2 0 2 4
1 2 - 1 2 - 2 0 2 2

ELEV BLUE GLOW AGAVE
UNIT - 5
PATI O
UNIT - 9

PATI UNIT O
- 2
UNIT - 3
UNIT - 4
PATI O
PATI O
PATI O
UNIT - 6
UNIT - 7
PATI O
UNIT - 10
UNIT - 11
PATI O
PATI O

PATI O BLUE FESCUE

DWARF BLUE CHALKSTICKS

DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY
LOT COVERAGE SUMMARY: DAT
E

REVISIO

TOTAL LANDSCAPED NS
AREA: 7,279 SF. LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: 31% > 25%

DWARF FUITLESS OLIVERED FOUNTAIN GRASS
1279 SF. OF MEDIUM WATER USE PLANTS (17.6%) 4759 SF. OF LOW WATER USE PLANTS (65.4%) 1256 SF. OF NO WATER USE ON D.G. & MULCH (17%) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE IN STREET SETBACK: 2,481 SF. (60 % > 50%) AS SHOWN
SCAL EDATE 12-12- 2022
P2220
CP
PROJECT NO.

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

GARDE NIA CATMI NT STAR JASMINE PURPLE HOPSEED BUSH

NEW ZEALAND FLAX
SHEET NO.

L- 1

HOLLY OAK (STREET TREE) EASTERN REDBUD
OF2
SHEET
115 of 638

CANOPY ABOVE

OPEN TO
BELOW
R
1 2 - 3 1 - 2 0 2 4
1 2 - 1 2 - 2 0 2 2

ROOF DECK COMMON AREA

ROOF DECK COMMON AREA OPEN TOBELO W

SOLAR PANEL LOCATION
DAT
E

REVISIO
NS
AS
SHOWN
SCAL EDATE 12-12- 2022
P2220
CP
PROJECT NO.

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY
SHEET NO.

LOF22
SHEET
116 of 638
Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan
424-434 West Milford Street
Glendale, CA 91203
March 21, 2023
Malekian + Associates
c/o Alen Malekian
2255 Honolulu Avenue 1A
Montrose, CA 91020
City of Glendale Community Development Department
Housing Division
141 North Glendale Avenue, Room 202
Glendale, CA 91206
DRAFT
117 of 638
2 Number of Dwelling Units Proposed:

Applicant has proposed the development of a new, density bonus rental housing project totaling forty-three (43) residential dwelling units (the “Project”). The Project will provide a total of eight (8) affordable units ((152.9% divided by 50%) x (15% multiplied by the base density (17)) = 7.79 (rounded up to 8)) to very low income households.

Maximum Number of Units Permitted per GMC:

The Project is located in the R-1650 (High Density Residential) zone. The Project site (APNs 5637- 020-011, 5637-020-012, 5637-020-013) has a lot area of 21,750 square feet. Sites zoned R-1650 with more than 90 feet of frontage are permitted one (1) unit per 1,320 square feet, which permits a maximum residential density of 17 units per acre. By right, Applicant has a base density of 17 units (21,750 / 1,320 = 16.48 rounded up to 17).

Number of Replacement Units Under Density Bonus Requirement:

Per State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915), an applicant is ineligible for a density bonus or any other incentives or concessions if a project is proposed on a parcel or parcels with rental dwelling units that have been vacated or demolished within a five (5)-year period preceding the project’s development application, or have been occupied by lower or very low income households, unless the proposed project replaces those units.

Pursuant to CA Govt Code § 65915, if any dwelling units are occupied on the date of a project’s development application, the proposed project is required to provide the same number of units of equivalent size (i.e., the same total number of bedrooms as the units being replaced) as affordable to the same or lower income households in occupancy. If the incomes are unknown to the applicant, there is an established rebuttable presumption per HUD’s Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy database. This presumption amounts to 63% of renter households at or below 80% AMI.

Per the Los Angeles County Assessor, between the three parcels, there are currently five (5) existing residential dwelling units at 11 bedrooms total. Through the replacement obligation, the Project owes four (4) units (63% x 5 existing unit = 3.15 rounded up to 4) at seven (7) bedrooms (63% x 11 existing bedrooms = 6.93 rounded up to 7). The Project is providing nine (9) bedrooms through the requirement to provide eight (8) affordable units to very low income households under GMC 30.36. As such, the applicant has met the replacement obligation, and no additional affordable units are required.

Number of Affordable Units Meeting Density Bonus Requirement:

Applicant is required to designate eight (8) units with a total of nine (9) bedrooms as affordable to very low income households. As currently designed, the Project contains twelve (12) alcove studio units, twenty-seven (27) one (1)-bedroom units, and four (4) two (2)-bedroom units.

Housing has accepted and approves the applicant’s recommendation of designating units 7, 8, 14, 16, 20, 29, 32, and 38 as affordable very-low units. The affordable units are detailed in Project floorplans attached hereto as Attachment 1, as well as immediately below:

DRAFT
118 of 638
3 Unit Number Square Footage Bedroom(s) Bathroom(s)
7 742 1 1
8 908 2 2
14 729 1 1
16 739 1 1
20 600 Studio 1
29 742 1 1
32 600 Studio 1
38 729 1 1
Amount of Density Bonus Requested:

Applicant is entitled to a fifty percent (50%) density bonus by providing at least fifteen percent (15%) of the units for rent to very low income households, or three (3) very low income units (15% of the base density of 17 = 2.55 (rounded up to 3)). Applicant is seeking a one hundred fifty-two point nine percent (152.9%) density bonus and will be providing a proportionate number of restricted units, calculated as eight (8) very low income units ((152.9% divided by 50%) x (15% multiplied by the base density (17)) = 7.79 (rounded up to 8)). State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq.) allows up to an automatic fifty percent (50%) density bonus and three (3) incentives in exchange for the provision of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the base units restricted as rentals for very low income households. Applicant’s request complies with State Density Bonus Law, as there is a positive correlation and proportionality between the requested density bonus and the number of very low income units to be provided, and State Density Bonus Law allows the City to grant a discretionary density bonus above fifty percent (50%). (CA Govt Code § 65915(n)).

However, since Applicant’s request for the grant of a density bonus is greater than fifty percent (50%), pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, it is subject to City Council approval following a public hearing. Per Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, the City Council is the reviewing and approving body for any density bonus request greater than the amount mandated by State Density Bonus Law.

Number and Description of Concessions Requested:

Pursuant to CA Govt Code § 65915(d)(2)(B) and GMC 30.36.070, the applicant is entitled to three (3) concessions by reserving fifteen percent (15%) of the units for very low income households.

Applicant has requested three (3) concessions:
1) Increase maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR);
2) Increase the maximum allowed height and stories; and 3) Not be subject to the requirement to provide additional open space for additional density gained by having lot width greater than 90 feet wide.

Amount of Parking Concessions Requested:

Pursuant to CA Govt Code section 65915(p)(1) and GMC 30.36.090(A), an applicant may be DRAFT
119 of 638
4 eligible for an automatic parking concession under CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(2)(A), which provides that upon the request of an applicant, the required vehicle parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, is not to exceed one-half (0.5) space per unit of a development providing at least eleven percent (11%) very low income units located within one-half (0.5) mile of a major transit stop with unobstructed access (collectively, the “Parking Concession). The Project’s unit mix includes twelve (12) studio units, twenty-seven (27) one-bedroom units and four (4) two-bedroom units. Based on the number of units provided, the Parking Concession requires a minimum of twenty-two (22) residential parking spaces. The Project exceeds the minimum requirement under the Parking Concession and will provide thirty-six (36) parking spaces total, designated for the residential units. Accordingly, and subject to the approval of Planning, the Project, meets and exceeds the parking requirements under the Parking Concession.

Child Care Space:

Not applicable.

Inclusionary Housing Requirement:

Per GMC 30.35, the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (the “IZO”) requires a housing development (a rental development project of eight (8) or more dwelling units proposed to be constructed in the City) to provide fifteen percent (15%) of the units as affordable to low-income households.

The Project is subject to the IZO. The Project is required to provide three (3) very low income units (15% of the base density of 17 = 2.55 (rounded up to 3)). The Project is providing 8 very low income units, which is 47% of the base density (8 affordable units / 17 base units = 47%).

Therefore, the Project exceeds the IZO requirement and no additional affordable units are required under the IZO.

Affordable Housing Commercial Development Impact Fee:

On May 7, 2019, the City adopted a Citywide Affordable Housing Commercial Development Impact Fee, Ordinance No. 5929, codified at GMC Chapter 4.11 (the “CDIF”). The CDIF became effective after a 60-day period on July 7, 2019.

With the exception of hotels, auto dealerships, community land uses which serve the public, and the reconstruction of any building destroyed by fire, flood, earthquake or other act of nature (so long asthe square footage does not exceed the square footage before the loss), the CDIF imposes a $4 per square foot fee (per the FY 2021-2022 Citywide Fee Schedule) on all commercial development projects with a gross floor area exceeding 1,250 square feet. The Project does not entail a permitted commercial component and is not subject to the commercial development impact fee.

Condition: The Project is conditioned on Applicant complying with CA Govt Code § 66300 (d)(2)(C) and (D)
DRAFT
120 of 638
PROJECT ADDRESS:

APN:PROPERTY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ZONING:LOT AREA:ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PER ZONE: PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AND STORIESMAX. ALLOWABLE F.A.R.PROPOSED FARMINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREDPROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREAMINIMUM REQ'D PRIVATE OUTDOOR SPACEPROPOSED PRIVATE OUTDOOR SPACEREQ'D. COMMON OUTDOOR SPACE -PROPOSED COMMON OUTDOOR SPACE -RESIDENTIAL ZONE DENSITY: (BY RIGHT)MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE MINIMUM DIMENSION OF TEN (10) FEET AND A MINIMUM AREA OF TWO HUNDRED (200) SFPROPOSED ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACENO. OF PARKING STALLS REQUIREDNO. OF BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 434, 430, 424 MILFORD ST. GLENDALE, CA 912035637-020-011, 5637-020-012, 5637-020-013HOUSTON'S WEST GLENDALE TRACT LOT 28, LOT 29, LOT 3043 UNIT APARTMENTR-1650 (R-1320 FOR LOT WIDTH 90 FEET OR MORE)21,750 SF36 FEET MAX. WITH 3 STORIES (ADDITIONAL 5 FEET IF 3:12)1 UNIT PER 1,320 SF IF LOT WIDTH 90 FEET OR MORE21,750 SF / 1,320 = 17 UNITS AFFORDABLE UNITS: 17 + 50% = 25.50 = 26 UNITSPROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS 43 UNITS 27 ONE BEDROOM UNITS - 27 X 0.5 = 13.50 STALLS 12 ALCOVE STUDIO UNITS - 12 X 0.5 = 6 STALLS 4 TWO BEDROOM UNITS - 4 X 1 = 4 STALLS

23.50 OR 24 STALLS
NO. OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED 36 STALLS
11 59' - 7 3/8" (4 STORIES)
REQUIRED FOR 25 UNITS X 200 = 5,000 SF
150' - 90' = 60'900 + (60 FT X 20) = 900 + 1,200 = 2,100 SF LEVEL 1
UNIT- 1 728 SFUNIT- 2 731 SFUNIT- 3 729 SFUNIT- 4 740 SFUNIT- 5UNIT- 6UNIT- 7UNIT- 8UNIT- 9UNIT- 10UNIT- 11 739 SF729 SF742 SF908 SF600 SF600 SF600 SF
LEVEL 2
UNIT- 12 UNIT- 13UNIT- 14UNIT- 15UNIT- 16UNIT- 17UNIT- 18UNIT- 19UNIT- 20UNIT- 21UNIT- 22 - 7,846 SF
LEVEL 3
UNIT- 23UNIT- 24UNIT- 25UNIT- 26UNIT- 27UNIT- 28UNIT- 29UNIT- 30UNIT- 31UNIT- 32UNIT- 33 LEVEL 4
UNIT- 34UNIT- 35
740 SF
UNIT- 36
729 SF
UNIT- 37
740 SF
UNIT- 38UNIT- 39UNIT- 40UNIT- 41UNIT- 42UNIT- 43
739 SF729 SF742 SF908 SF600 SF600 SF600 SF
7,127SF
21,750 SF X 1.0 = 21,750 SF30,665 SF = 1.4125% OF LOT AREA = 21,750 SF X 0.25 = 5,437.50 SF6,602 SF21,750 SF X 0.50 = 10,875 SF10,860 SF40 SF PER UNIT WITH MIN. LENGTH OR WIDTH OF 4'-0" REQ'D ADDITIONALOPEN SPACE- LOCATED WITHIN 50% OF THE LOT DEPTH NEAREST FRONT PROPERTY LINE UNIT- 1 UNIT- 2UNIT- 3UNIT- 4UNIT- 5UNIT- 6UNIT- 7UNIT- 8UNIT- 9UNIT- 10UNIT- 11 92 SF78 SF91 SF67 SF67 SF67 SF
UNIT- 12 UNIT- 13UNIT- 14UNIT- 15UNIT- 16UNIT- 17UNIT- 18UNIT- 19UNIT- 20UNIT- 21UNIT- 22 53 SF50 SF52 SF45 SF45 SF44 SF
UNIT- 23 UNIT- 24UNIT- 25UNIT- 26UNIT- 27UNIT- 28UNIT- 29UNIT- 30UNIT- 31UNIT- 32UNIT- 33 UNIT- 34 UNIT- 35UNIT- 36UNIT- 37UNIT- 38UNIT- 39UNIT- 40UNIT- 41UNIT- 42UNIT- 43 43 UNITS - 25 = 18 UNITS x 150 = 2,700 SF 7,700 SF
1ST LEVEL - 1,422 SF + 1,545 + 261 + 407 + 295 = 3,930 SFROOF DECK - 2,453 + 2,355 = 4,808 SF 8,738 SF (1,038 SF MORE THAN REQUIRED) 728 SF
731 SF
729 SF740 SF739 SF729 SF742 SF908 SF600 SF600 SF600 SF
- 7,846 SF
728 SF731 SF729 SF740 SF739 SF729 SF742 SF908 SF600 SF600 SF600 SF 7,846 SF
78 SF78 SF78 SF78 SF78 SF
50 SF50 SF52 SF50 SF50 SF
53 SF50 SF50 SF50 SF52 SF50 SF50 SF52 SF45 SF45 SF44 SF 50 SF50 SF50 SF52 SF50 SF50 SF52 SF45 SF45 SF44 SF
***

CONCESSION / INCENTIVES / WAIVER ITEM ALLOWABLE / REQUIRED PROPOSED

1. FLOOR AREA RATIO 30,665 SF = 1.41 21,750 SF X 1.0 = 21,750 SF2. BUILDING HEIGHT AND NO. OF STORIES 36 FEET MAX. WITH 3 STORIES (ADDITIONAL 5 FEET IF 3:12)
59' - 7 3/8" (4 STORIES)

CONCESSIONCONCESSIONCONCESSION
NONE
(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(2 BEDROOM) (STUDIO)(STUDIO)(STUDIO)
(2 BEDROOM)
(STUDIO)(STUDIO)(STUDIO)
(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM) (1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM) (2 BEDROOM)
(STUDIO)(STUDIO)(STUDIO)
(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(1 BEDROOM)(2 BEDROOM) (STUDIO)(STUDIO)(STUDIO)
(E) BUILDING INFOPROPOSED NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE UNITS 8 INCLUSIONARY UNITS (VERY LOW INCOME) WITH A TOTAL OF 9 BEDROOMS = (47% OF 17 UNITS) (E) 2 - TWO BEDROOM UNITS @ 424 W. MILFORD(E) 2 - TWO BEDROOM UNITS @ 430 W. MILFORD(E) 1 - THREE BEDROOM UNITS @ 430 W. MILFORD5 EXISTING UNITS WITH 11 BEDROOMS TOTAL

3. ADDITIONAL OUTDOOR SPACE 150' - 90' = 60'
900 + (60 FT X 20) = 900 + 1,200 = 2,100 SF NONE
*
**
***
**
*
* AFFORDABLE UNIT
35(3$5('¬)25
352-(&75(9,6,2163/277('¬'$7(6+((7¬7,7/(,668(¬3+$6(,668(¬'$7(352-(&7¬180%(5'5$:1¬%<6+((7¬180%(5
¬+RQROXOX¬$YH¬$0RQWURVH¬&$¬

F¬¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWHV¬,QF¬UHVHUYHV¬LWV¬FRPPRQ¬ODZ¬FRS\ULJKW¬DQG¬RWKHU¬SURSHUW\¬ULJKWV¬LQ¬WKHVH¬SODQV¬7KHVH¬SODQV¬DUH¬QRW¬WR¬EH¬UHSURGXFHG¬DOWHUHG¬RU¬FRSLHG¬LQ¬DQ\¬IRUP¬RU¬PDQQHU¬ZKDWVRHYHU¬QRU¬DUH¬WKH\¬WR¬EH¬DVVLJQHG¬WR¬DQ\¬WKLUG¬SDUW\¬ZLWKRXW¬ILUVW¬REWDLQLQJ¬WKH¬H[SUHVV¬ZULWWHQ¬SHUPLVVLRQ¬DQG¬FRQVHQW¬RI¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWH¬,QF Associates
¬

¬30
$1'5($%22/,$1
352326('6725<81,7$3$570(17'70,/)25'67*/(1'$/(&$ 352-(&7=21,1*'$7$
3URMHFW¬6WDWXV3URMHFW¬1XPEHU
PROPOSED 4
-STORY 43
-UNIT APARTMENT
434, 430, 424 MILFORD ST. GLENDALE, CA 91203

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT DATA
DRAFT
121 of 638

COURTYARD
DN
UP
UP

3.75% 5.36% 14.99%
DN
1 D-A4.0
2 D-A4.0
2 BEDROOM

ALCOVE STUDIO
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
600 SF
739 SF
729 SF
742 SF
731 SF
729 SF
740 SF
728 SF
UNIT - 1
UNIT - 2
UNIT - 3
UNIT - 4
UNIT - 5UNIT - 6
UNIT - 7
UNIT - 8UNIT - 9

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
UNIT - 10

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
UNIT - 11
29' - 4 11/16" 25' - 8" 24' - 9 5/16" 25' - 2"
30' - 3 1/4" 20' - 9 3/4" 7' - 0"
5' - 0"
ELEV
5' - 0"
908 SF
30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0"
5' - 0" 5' - 0"

REQ'D SETBACK REQ'D SETBACK
20' - 0"

REQ'D SETBACK
5' - 0"

REQ'D SETBACK
7' - 6 1/2" 1' - 6" 6' - 0"
6' - 1 1/8" 24' - 2 7/8" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0" 3' - 4"

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
20' - 9 11/16" 20' - 9 1/2"

LIVING/DINING
BR 1BR 2 KITCHEN
BATH 1 W/D
BATH 2

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
W/D

LIVING/DINING

BEDROOM BATH

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC
PATIO
PATIO

PATIOPATIO

PATIOPATIOPATIO

PATIOPATIOPATIO
PATIO
W/D
W/DW/D
*
*
8' - 0"
25' - 0"
26' - 1"
ELEC
LONG
TERM

BICYCLE

STORAGE

RECYCLE
145' - 0 1/2"
ELEV
117' - 0"
144' - 5 13/16"
27' - 6"

STORAGE
TRASH
UP
UP

STORAGE
1 D-A4.0
2 D-A4.0
5' - 4" 10' - 6" 25' - 6" 25' - 6" 17' - 0" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 8' - 6" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 17' - 0" 10' - 6" 17' - 0" 10' - 6"
10' - 6" 25' - 6" 25' - 6"
10' - 6" 9' - 0"
17' - 0" 25' - 6"
3 D-A4.0

DRIVEWAY WIDTH
12' - 0"
124' - 6 7/8"
2' - 3"
13' - 7"
1' - 6"
7' - 8"
20' - 0 1/2"
6 3/8"
139' - 7 7/8" 5' - 0 1/16" 5' - 4 7/16"
20' - 0 1/2" 38' - 8" 19' - 10" 12' - 2" 26' - 10"
12' - 10"
6" - 3 STD STALLS @ 8' 6" - 3 STD STALLS @ 8' 6" - 2 STD STALLS @ 8' 2 STD STALLS @ 8' -6" 2 STD STALLS @ 8' -6" 2 STD STALLS @ 8' -6" 6" - 2 STD STALLS @ 8' 6" - 3 STD STALLS @ 8'
H.C. VAN
6" - 3 STD STALLS @ 8' 6" - 3 STD STALLS @ 8'
6" - 2 STD STALLS @ 8'

14.99%

14.99% 3.80%

7.31%
TYP. STALL LENGTH
18' - 0"
13 4 12
2213
2329
3430
35 36
TYP. STALL LENGTH
18' - 0"
18' - 0"
TYP. STALL LENGTH
18' - 0"
TYP. STALL LENGTH
18' - 0"
TYP. STALL LENGTH
18' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE 8' - 0"
4' - 0"
TYP.
18' - 8"
4' - 0"
12345
6 7891011121314151617
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 343332
3938373635
4140
4243
STORAGE - 90 CU.FT. MIN REQUIRED PER UNIT
PROVIDED = 3' X 8' X 6' = 144 CU FT. PER UNIT
TYP. STORAGE DEPTH
3' - 0"
HTGNEL EGAROTS. PYT
8' - 0"
. PYT
4' - 0"
2' - 0"
1' - 0"
TYP.

SETBACK
5' - 0 9 1/ 6"
7' - 0 15/16"

GAS METERS

ELECTRIC METERS
9' - 0"
TYP.
1' - 0"
4' - 0"
TYP.
4' - 0"
TYP.
4' - 0"
TYP.
35(3$5('¬)25
352-(&75(9,6,2163/277('¬'$7(6+((7¬7,7/(,668(¬3+$6(,668(¬'$7(352-(&7¬180%(5'5$:1¬%<6+((7¬180%(5
¬+RQROXOX¬$YH¬$0RQWURVH¬&$¬

F¬¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWHV¬,QF¬UHVHUYHV¬LWV¬FRPPRQ¬ODZ¬FRS\ULJKW¬DQG¬RWKHU¬SURSHUW\¬ULJKWV¬LQ¬WKHVH¬SODQV¬7KHVH¬SODQV¬DUH¬QRW¬WR¬EH¬UHSURGXFHG¬DOWHUHG¬RU¬FRSLHG¬LQ¬DQ\¬IRUP¬RU¬PDQQHU¬ZKDWVRHYHU¬QRU¬DUH¬WKH\¬WR¬EH¬DVVLJQHG¬WR¬DQ\¬WKLUG¬SDUW\¬ZLWKRXW¬ILUVW¬REWDLQLQJ¬WKH¬H[SUHVV¬ZULWWHQ¬SHUPLVVLRQ¬DQG¬FRQVHQW¬RI¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWH¬,QF Associates
¬

¬30
$1'5($%22/,$1
352326('6725<81,7$3$570(17'$0,/)25'67*/(1'$/(&$ )/2253/$16
3URMHFW¬6WDWXV3URMHFW¬1XPEHU
3/32" = 1'-0" 1 1ST LEVEL PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 P1- SUBTERRANEAN PARKING PLAN NORTH 0' 10' 20' 40'
* AFFORDABLE UNITS
UNIT - 7UNIT - 8
DRAFT
122 of 638

OPEN TO
BELOW
DN
UP DN
1 D-A4.0
UP
2 D-A4.0
UNIT - 12
UNIT - 13
UNIT - 14
UNIT - 15
UNIT - 16
UNIT - 17UNIT - 18
UNIT - 19
UNIT - 20UNIT - 21UNIT - 22
REQ'D 2ND LEVEL FRONT SETBACK
25' - 2" 24' - 9 5/16" 25' - 2 11/16"
REQ'D 2ND LEVEL

REAR SETBACK
2 BEDROOM

ALCOVE STUDIO
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM

ALCOVE STUDIOALCOVE STUDIO
4' - 7"
908 SF
600 SF
739 SF
729 SF 742 SF
728 SF
731 SF
729 SF
740 SF
8 600 SF 600 SF
' - 0" 8' - 0"
REQUIRED 2ND LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
23' - 0"
REQUIRED 2ND LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
4' - 6" 29' - 4 11/16" 25' - 8" 24' - 9 5/16" 25' - 2"
1' - 6"
3' - 0" 8' - 0"
7' - 0"
6' - 1 5/8" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0" 3' - 4" 24' - 2 3/8" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0"
32' - 0" 24' - 8 3/4" 32' - 0"

OPEN TO
BELOW

OPEN TO
BELOW
30' - 3 1/4" 20' - 9 11/16" 20' - 9 1/2" 20' - 9 3/4"

LIVING/DINING
BR 1BR 2 KITCHEN
BATH 1 W/D
BATH 2

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
W/D

LIVING/DINING

BEDROOM BATH

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC
BALC.

W/D
W/DW/D
BALC.BALC.

BALC.BALC.BALC.

BALC. BALC.

BALC.BALC.BALC.
4' - 6"
2' - 6"
4' - 6"
3' - 4"
6' - 6"
6' - 0"
2' - 6"
*
*
*
1 D-A4.0
2 D-A4.0
UP DN
UNIT - 23UNIT - 24
UNIT - 25
UNIT - 26
UNIT - 27
UNIT - 28UNIT - 29
UNIT - 30
UNIT - 31
UNIT - 32
UNIT - 33

OPEN TO
BELOW
2 BEDROOM

ALCOVE STUDIO
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM

ALCOVE STUDIO

ALCOVE STUDIO
600 SF
739 SF
729 SF 742 SF
731 SF
729 SF
728 SF
740 SF
600 SF
600 SF
908 SF
11' - 0" 11' - 0"
23' - 0" 11' - 0"
REQ'D 3RD LEVEL FRONT SETBACK REQ'D 3RD LEVEL

REAR SETBACK
REQUIRED 3RD LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
REQUIRED 3RD LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
4' - 6" 29' - 4 11/16" 25' - 8"
24' - 9 5/16"
25' - 2"
1' - 6"
24' - 9 5/16"
6' - 1 5/8" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0" 3' - 4" 24' - 2 3/8" 7' - 0"
30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0"

OPEN TO
BELOW

OPEN TO
BELOW
DN UP
30' - 3 1/4" 20' - 9 11/16" 20' - 9 7/16" 20' - 9 13/16"

LIVING/DINING
BR 1BR 2 KITCHEN
BATH 1 W/D
BATH 2

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
W/D

LIVING/DINING

BEDROOM BATH

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC
BALC.

W/D
W/DW/D
BALC.BALC.

BALC.BALC.BALC.

BALC. BALC.

BALC.BALC.BALC.
2' - 6"
4' - 6"
2' - 6" 3' - 4"
*
*
35(3$5('¬)25
352-(&75(9,6,2163/277('¬'$7(6+((7¬7,7/(,668(¬3+$6(,668(¬'$7(352-(&7¬180%(5'5$:1¬%<6+((7¬180%(5
¬+RQROXOX¬$YH¬$0RQWURVH¬&$¬

F¬¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWHV¬,QF¬UHVHUYHV¬LWV¬FRPPRQ¬ODZ¬FRS\ULJKW¬DQG¬RWKHU¬SURSHUW\¬ULJKWV¬LQ¬WKHVH¬SODQV¬7KHVH¬SODQV¬DUH¬QRW¬WR¬EH¬UHSURGXFHG¬DOWHUHG¬RU¬FRSLHG¬LQ¬DQ\¬IRUP¬RU¬PDQQHU¬ZKDWVRHYHU¬QRU¬DUH¬WKH\¬WR¬EH¬DVVLJQHG¬WR¬DQ\¬WKLUG¬SDUW\¬ZLWKRXW¬ILUVW¬REWDLQLQJ¬WKH¬H[SUHVV¬ZULWWHQ¬SHUPLVVLRQ¬DQG¬FRQVHQW¬RI¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWH¬,QF Associates
¬

¬30
$1'5($%22/,$1
352326('6725<81,7$3$570(17'$0,/)25'67*/(1'$/(&$ )/2253/$16
3URMHFW¬6WDWXV3URMHFW¬1XPEHU
3/32" = 1'-0" 1 2ND LEVEL PLAN
NORTH
0' 10' 20' 40'
3/32" = 1'-0" 2 3RD LEVEL PLAN
* AFFORDABLE UNITS
UNIT - 14UNIT - 16UNIT - 20UNIT - 29UNIT - 32
DRAFT
123 of 638
DN

ROOF DECK

COMMON AREA
1 D-A4.0
2 D-A4.0

OPEN TO
BELOW
DN
2' - 6" 3' - 4"

SOLAR PANEL

LOCATION

ROOF DECK

COMMON AREA

AC UNITS AC UNITS

AC UNITS

OPEN TO
BELOW

CANOPY ABOVE
3' - 1"

EAVE EAVE
EAVE
EAVE
1' - 6"
EAVE
EAVE
3' - 8"
2' - 6"
2' - 6"
2' - 6"
5' - 0"
1' - 6"

EQUIPMENT

SCREENING -

PLASTERED WALL
1 D-A4.0
2 D-A4.0
UNIT - 34
UNIT - 35
UNIT - 36
UNIT - 37
UNIT - 38UNIT - 39
UNIT - 40
UNIT - 41UNIT - 42UNIT - 43

OPEN TO
BELOW
REQ'D 4TH LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
REQ'D 4TH ELEVELFRONT SETBACK
25' - 8" 24' - 9 5/16" 25' - 2"
7' - 0"
ROOF

DECK ELEV
DN UP
UP DN
REQUIRED 4TH LEVEL

REAR SETBACK
2 BEDROOM

ALCOVE STUDIOALCOVE STUDIO

ALCOVE STUDIO
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
1 BEDROOM
600 SF
739 SF
729 SF
742 SF
740 SF
729 SF
740 SF
600 SF 600 SF
1' - 6"
908 SF
23' - 0" 33' - 10 11/16" 1' - 6" 11' - 0"
REQ'D 4TH LEVEL

SIDE SETBACK
11' - 0" 6' - 1 5/8" 24' - 2 3/8" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0" 3' - 4" 11' - 0" 30' - 4" 5' - 0" 30' - 4" 25' - 0" 30' - 0"

OPEN TO
BELOW

OPEN TO
BELOW
30' - 3 1/4" 20' - 9 11/16" 20' - 9 1/2" 20' - 9 3/4"

LIVING/DINING
BR 1BR 2 KITCHEN
BATH 1 W/D
BATH 2

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

LIVING /
DINING

KITCHEN

SLEEPING
AREA
BATH
W/D

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

KITCHEN
BATH

BEDROOM

LIVING/DINING
W/D
WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC

LIVING/DINING

KITCHEN

BATH BEDROOM WIC
BALC.

W/D
W/DW/D
BALC.BALC.

BALC.BALC.BALC.

BALC.

BALC.BALC.BALC.
3' - 4"
3' - 6"
2' - 6" 2' - 6"
4' - 6"
*
35(3$5('¬)25
352-(&75(9,6,2163/277('¬'$7(6+((7¬7,7/(,668(¬3+$6(,668(¬'$7(352-(&7¬180%(5'5$:1¬%<6+((7¬180%(5
¬+RQROXOX¬$YH¬$0RQWURVH¬&$¬

F¬¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWHV¬,QF¬UHVHUYHV¬LWV¬FRPPRQ¬ODZ¬FRS\ULJKW¬DQG¬RWKHU¬SURSHUW\¬ULJKWV¬LQ¬WKHVH¬SODQV¬7KHVH¬SODQV¬DUH¬QRW¬WR¬EH¬UHSURGXFHG¬DOWHUHG¬RU¬FRSLHG¬LQ¬DQ\¬IRUP¬RU¬PDQQHU¬ZKDWVRHYHU¬QRU¬DUH¬WKH\¬WR¬EH¬DVVLJQHG¬WR¬DQ\¬WKLUG¬SDUW\¬ZLWKRXW¬ILUVW¬REWDLQLQJ¬WKH¬H[SUHVV¬ZULWWHQ¬SHUPLVVLRQ¬DQG¬FRQVHQW¬RI¬0DOHNLDQ¬DQG¬$VVRFLDWH¬,QF Associates
¬

¬30
$1'5($%22/,$1
352326('6725<81,7$3$570(17'$0,/)25'67*/(1'$/(&$ )/2253/$16
3URMHFW¬6WDWXV3URMHFW¬1XPEHU
3/32" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF DECK PLAN
NORTH
0' 10' 20' 40'
3/32" = 1'-0" 2 4TH LEVEL PLAN
* AFFORDABLE UNIT
UNIT - 38
DRAFT
124 of 638
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY: 434, 430, 424 W. MILFORD ST.
434 W. MILFORD ST.
125 of 638
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY: 434, 430, 424 W. MILFORD ST.
430 W. MILFORD ST.
126 of 638
PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY: 434, 430, 424 W. MILFORD ST.
424 W. MILFORD ST.
127 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Findings
424, 430 & 434 W. Milford Street, Glendale, CA 91203
“Class 32 consists of Projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section: (a) The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The Project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (d) Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.” (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15332) (“CEQA Guidelines”).

Project Description
The applicant is seeking approval of a Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan for a new residential project at 424, 430, and 434 W. Milford Street. The applicant requests the density bonus, as well as three concessions, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915, et seq. (“Density Bonus Law”), which allows developers that seek and agree to provide at least 15 percent of the units in a housing development to very-low income households, a mandatory 50 percent density bonus, as well as three concessions. The Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan meets the requirements of the Density Bonus Law and Glendale Municipal Code (GMC) Section 30.36.050 because the project is providing 15 percent of the total base density units of the housing development as affordable units which will be restricted to very-low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code.

The project involves the demolition of five existing residential structures on site and the construction of a new, four-story, 43-unit multi-family residential project totaling 30,665 square feet (SF), over a one-level, semi-subterranean parking structure containing 36 residential parking spaces. Pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law, the project will provide eight (8) affordable units reserved for very-low income households. The project qualifies for reduced parking inclusive of guest and handicapped spaces, under the State Density Bonus Law and GMC 30.36.090. The Project’s unit mix includes twelve (12) studio units, twenty-seven (27) one-bedroom units and four (4) two-bedroom units and provides at least 40 square feet of private open space for each residential unit and 8,738 square feet of common open space for residential uses.

The 21,750 square-foot site is currently developed with five residential buildings. The 424 address is developed with two single-family units (front house built in 1922; rear house in 1920). The 430 address also contains two units (front house built in 1913; 1 128 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
rear house in 1953). The 434 address is developed with one single-family residence built in 1920. The site is located on the south side of Milford Street, in the R-1650 (Medium-High Density Residential) zone.

The proposed project would demolish the existing residential structures and garages in conjunction with the construction of the new four-story, 43-unit multi-family residential project totaling 30,665 SF and featuring eight (8) affordable units restricted to very-low income households. Parking will be provided on-site within an underground, one-level, semi-subterranean parking structure containing 36 residential parking spaces. The project is providing the required amount of parking per Glendale Municipal Code (GMC 30.32) and California Government Code Section 65915(p). Primary access to the building and the semi-subterranean parking will be from W. Milford Street.

The project site is approximately 0.3 miles west of Downtown Glendale surrounded by existing urban uses, including commercial and residential buildings. The Project Site is bordered by multi-family residential development directly to the south, east and west, and Columbus Elementary school to the north (across Milford Street). a. The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations.

The Land Use Element of the Glendale General Plan includes a goal to “Support the creation of higher density residential development and alternative forms of medium and high-density housing in those areas best suited from the standpoint of accessibility, current development, community organization, transportation and circulation facilities and economic feasibility” (Glendale General Plan Land Use Element, page 7). The Project is consistent with and helps achieve this goal by redeveloping the project site and building a new structure which will yield a total of 43 residential dwelling units with proximate access to public transportation to access neighborhood services daily. Moreover, the project will advance the goals and policies of the General Plan, Housing Element (2021-2029), including, but not limited to, Goal 1 (“A City with a Wide Range of Housing Types to Meet the Needs of Current and Future Residents), Goal 3 (“A City with Increased Opportunities for Affordable and Special Needs Housing Development) Housing Services that Address Groups with Special Housing Needs) and Policies 3.1 and 3.2 (“Encourage both the private and public sectors to produce or assist in the production of affordable housing for special needs groups such as: persons with disabilities, the elderly, large families, singleparent households, and formerly homeless) and (“Promote the development of extremely low, very low, low and moderate income housing by allowing developers density bonuses or other financial incentives for providing units for low and moderate income residents. The unit mix and location of affordable housing units in density bonus projects must be approved by the City and included in an affordable housing agreement.”). The proposed 43-unit residential development will be consistent with the other various elements and objectives of the General Plan. 2 129 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
The project site is located in the R-1650 (Medium High Density Residential) zone.

The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the project site as Medium High Density Residential. The Land Use Element is the most directly related to the approval of this use. All other elements of the General Plan will not be impacted as a result of the project. The subject site does not contain any historic resources and is not designated or slated for open space or recreational use and will operate in compliance with the Noise Element thresholds. The Safety Element does not identify any hazards associated with the site. The site is not within a hazard zone and the conditions placed on the proposed use will ensure the project does not contribute to local crime. The adjacent Milford Street can accommodate the traffic generated as a result of the project. The Circulation Element identifies W. Milford Street, west of Central Avenue, as a Local Street, which can accommodate the traffic generated as a result of the project. This street serves the residential needs of the immediate community, carrying low volumes of traffic to and from collectors and arterials.

Additionally, the City’s Traffic Engineer reviewed the Project and determined that no significant increase in traffic would occur as a result of the Project, as it would not generate a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips to and from the site. The project is consistent with its land use designation. Multi-family residential uses in the R-1650 (Medium-High Density Residential) zone is a permitted use in this zone and subject to the provisions of the R-1650 zone.

The Project is consistent with Zoning Code designations, standards and regulations, because the Zoning Code recognizes that waivers and incentives associated with density bonus projects are either statutorily allowed by right or may be granted where qualified. The Zoning Code allows one dwelling unit for every 1,650 square feet of lot area. Sites zoned R-1650 with more than 90 feet of frontage are permitted one (1) unit per 1,320 square feet, which permits a maximum residential density of 17 units per acre.

Based on the zoning designation and the lot area (approximately 21,750 square feet), by right, the applicant has a base density of 17 units (21,750 / 1,320 = 16.45 rounded up to 17). Applicant is entitled to a fifty percent (50%) density bonus by right because the applicant is restricting at least fifteen percent (15%) of the units for rent to very low income households, or three (3) very low income units (15 percent of the base density of 17 = 2.55 (rounded up to 3)). The applicant is seeking a one hundred fifty-two and nine tenths of a percent (152.9%) density bonus and will be providing a proportionate number of restricted units, calculated as eight (8) very low income units ((152.9% divided by 50%) x (15% multiplied by the base density (17)) = 7.79 (rounded up to 8)) reserved for very low income households.
b. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

The project site is located in the R-1650 (Medium High Density Residential) zone, entirely within the City of Glendale boundary limits. The site is approximately 21,750 square feet (0.499 acres), which is less than five acres in size. The project site is substantially surrounded by existing similar and complimentary uses. Surrounding urban uses, including multi-family residential are located to the north, east and west of 3 130 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
the subject site. As the Public Resources Code (PRC) defines qualified urban use as “any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation passenger facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses,” the Project Site is substantially surrounded by urban uses. (PRC § 21072.)
c. The Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The project site is fully developed with five existing residential uses built between 1913 and 1953. The project site is not currently a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, and no documentation exists which identifies the project site as such. There are no protected trees on the project site. Therefore, the site does not contain or have value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d. Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

The project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

Traffic
Parking for the project is provided within a one-level semi subterranean garage.

Access to the 36-space, parking garage is on W. Milford Street via a driveway proposed at the eastern portion of the site.

Based on the attached trip generation estimates conducted by staff, the proposed project is estimated to generate fewer than 50 net peak-hour trips, thus, no Traffic Impact Analysis is required. A summary of the results are attached hereto as Attachment “1”.

Vehicle Miles Traveled
In 2018, the State of California amended the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Appendix G question for transportation impacts to delete reference to vehicle delay and level of service and instead refer to Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines asking if the Project will result in a substantial increase in VMT. Accordingly, the City of Glendale adopted VMT as the metric for assessing transportation impacts for land use Projects. To comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), development projects in the City of Glendale must conduct vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis to evaluate a project’s potential significant impacts. The City has prepared Transportation Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, to provide guidance on whether a project can be screened out of a detailed VMT analysis, or if the applicant would need to perform a detailed VMT analysis. The guidelines include detailed guidance for conducting an SB 743-consistent transportation impact analysis of VMT as well as 4 131 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
assessing significant impacts related to public transit, pedestrians, bicyclists, hazards/design features, and emergency access.

The project is not required to prepare a detailed Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis because according to Section 2.1.2.1 of the City’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines, projects that generate fewer than 145 daily vehicle trips can be presumed to cause a less-than-significant transportation impact and would not require a detailed VMT analysis; which is based on the proposed project’s total uses without taking a credit for existing uses. As proposed, the project is considered a small project, which is estimated to generate less than 50 net peak-hour trips and is thus screened out of the requirement to prepare a detailed VMT analysis. The project would have a less-thansignificant VMT impact.

Noise
The project is located in a developed urban area. The surrounding neighborhood is developed with residential dwellings to the north, east, and west of the subject site. The proposed project would generate similar if the not the same noise as other residential uses in the area. As a result, the project would not add substantial operational noise that would be audible above existing conditions.

A temporary periodic increase in ambient noise would occur during construction activities associated with the proposed project. Noise from the construction activities would be generated by vehicles and equipment involved during various stages of construction operations: site grading, foundation, and building construction. The noise levels created by construction equipment would vary depending on factors such as the type of equipment and the specific model, the mechanical/operational condition of the equipment, and the type of operation being performed. However, all development within the project site will be required to comply with the City of Glendale Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 8.36), which prohibits construction activities to between the hours of 7:00 p.m. on one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day or from 7:00 p.m. on Saturday to 7:00 a.m. on Monday or from 7:00 p.m. preceding a holiday.

The proposed project would have a minimal effect on the noise environment in proximity to the project site. Noise generated by the proposed project would result primarily from visitors, off-site traffic, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. However, the proposed project’s mechanical equipment would need to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance, which establishes maximum permitted noise levels from mechanical equipment. The project would be constructed to reduce interior noise to acceptable levels as required by the building code, and the project is not anticipated to generate noise in excess of limits contained in the Noise Element.

The project’s compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance would ensure that noise levels from building mechanical equipment would not exceed thresholds of significance.
5 132 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
The proposed project would be constructed using typical construction techniques and would not require the use of pile driving for construction, thus reducing significant vibration impacts. Heavy construction equipment (e.g., bulldozer and excavator) would generate a limited amount of ground-borne vibration during construction activities at short distances away from the source. The use of equipment would be limited to a few hours spread over several days during grading and excavation activities. As such, ground-borne vibration and noise levels associated with the proposed project would be less than significant.

Air Quality
The California Emissions Estimator Model® (CalEEMod) was used to estimate air quality impacts during the construction and operation stages of the project. Results from the model indicate that the proposed project would not exceed thresholds for construction, area, or operational impacts. A summary of the results is attached hereto as Attachment “2".

Water Quality
Implementation of the proposed project will require compliance with all the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements including the submittal and certification of plans and details showing both construction and post-construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are integrated into the design of the project.

The submittal of a Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), as approved by the City Engineer, will also be required to be integrated into the design of the project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project is not expected to violate any water quality standards or wastewater discharge requirements since the project will be required to comply with applicable permitting requirements.

Because the proposed infill development would redevelop land that is fully developed with urban uses, construction would not impact water flows or water quality. The Project would comply with the City’s Low Impact Development (LID) Guidelines set forth in Chapter 13.43 of the GMC and with applicable state and federal regulations.

Such LID standards are designed to minimize the impervious area footprint, prevent pollutants of concern from leaving the development site in stormwater as the result of storms, and minimize hydromodification impacts to natural drainage systems. (GMC §

13.43.040(A). Compliance with these regulations will ensure that the Project would not result in a significant impact to water quality. Existing utilities would provide water supplies and wastewater treatment services to the subject property. e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

There will not be a considerable increase in demand for services or utilities due to project implementation. The project would be located in an existing urban area with existing buildings that have been adequately served by existing public utilities and 6 133 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
services. All new construction on site will be served by the same existing public utilities and services. These services include water, electricity, solid waste collection and sewer services provided by the City of Glendale. Accordingly, the Project will be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2)
Proposed Findings
a. Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located a Project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant.

Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the Project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

Because the Project is relying on Class 32 exemption, this exception does not apply. b. Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive Projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

There is not a succession of known projects of the same type located in the same place as the subject project. Since this project qualifies for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption and is subject to Regulatory Compliance Measures, no cumulative impacts are anticipated. Further, the proposed 43-unit multi-family residential development does not exceed thresholds identified for impacts to the area (including noise, traffic, and air quality) and will not result in significant cumulative impacts. c. Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

The project proposes a 43-unit multi-family residential project in an area zoned and designated for such use. Other similarly situated sites could be developed in the same manner and there is nothing unusual about the project site. Adjacent and nearby lots are developed with residential buildings and a public elementary school and parking lot across the street to the north. No unusual circumstances are present or foreseeable. 7 134 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
d. Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a Project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.

The project site is located in an urban environment surrounded by urban development.

The site is bordered by Doran Street to the North, Lexington Drive to the South, Columbus Avenue to the East, and Pacific Avenue to the West. The project site is surrounded by existing urban uses, including residential buildings and a public elementary school. According to information on the California Department of Transportation’s State Scenic Highway Program, there are no state scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site.
e. Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a Project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

The project site is developed and is not within a designated hazardous site. The project site is not located on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List-Site Cleanup (Cortese List), nor is it listed on the EnvironStor database. Further, the project site is not on the following lists maintained by the State Water Board: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites, Solid Waste Disposal Sites, or Active Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders. The project site is also not identified on the list of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code, identified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. f. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a Project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

The properties at 424, 430 & 434 W. Milford Street are not listed on the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, or Glendale Register of Historic Resources. The South Glendale Historic Resource Survey (2019) assessed the structures on these properties and found that none of the structures are eligible for listing in the Glendale Register (California Historic Resource Status Code 6Z) and therefore not considered historic resources under CEQA. Professional planning staff, including staff with expertise in evaluating historic resources, have provided further analysis, including review of the rear portions of the properties that were not accessed during the 2019 survey, and found the rear houses and garages do not qualify as historic resources because none of the findings that would qualify the properties for listing on the Glendale Register pursuant to GMC §15.20.050 (Findings for listing resources in the Glendale Register of Historic Resources), can be made, and therefore these properties are not considered historic resources. Specifically, the properties are not:
8 135 of 638
CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 424-434 W. Milford Street
A. Identified with important events in national, state, or city history, or exemplifies significant contributions to the broad cultural, political, economic, social, tribal, or historic heritage of the nation, state, or city, and do not retain historic integrity.

B. Associated with a person, persons, or groups who significantly contributed to the history of the nation, state, region, or city, and retain historic integrity.

C. Embodiments of the distinctive and exemplary characteristics of an architectural style, architectural type, period, or method of construction; and do not represent notable work of a master designer, builder or architect whose genius influenced his or her profession; do not possesses high artistic values or retain historic integrity.

D. Properties that have yielded, or have the potential to yield, information important to archaeological pre-history or history of the nation, state, region, or city, and retains historic integrity.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Trip generation estimates

2. California Emissions Estimator Module
9 136 of 638
Table 1
Preliminary Project Trip Generation [1]
424‐434 Milford St
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Out
Land Use: (ITE CODE) Size Daily Trips
In Out Total In Total
Proposed Project
Multifamily Housing (Mid‐Rise) 43 DU 195 4 12 16 10 7 17 Local Transportation Analysis May Be Required (> 50 Peak Hour Trips)?* NO [1] Rates and Numbers based on the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual * If YES, applicant must conduct a trip generation study using any trip reductions as applicable to the project to determine if LTA required. 137 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project
South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size

43.00 36.00
Metric
Dwelling Unit
Space
Lot Acreage

0.48 Floor Surface Area
30,665.00
Population
Apartments High Rise 123
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.01 16,321.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Year 2026
Utility Company Glendale Water and Power
CO2 Intensity 948.98
(lb/MWhr)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - Construct 4-story, 43 unit, 30,665 SF multifamily building with a 36 parking space 16,321 SF semi-subterranean garage on a 21,750 SF property. Demo includes a 424 W Milford (1,202SF, plus 768 SF), 430 W Milford (1,012 SF plus 804SF) and 434 W Milford (1,362 SF).

Land Use - Land use types include, i) 43 dwelling units on a 21,750 SF lot (0.49 acre) (86 units per acre - which is defined as a Apartments High Rise by CalEEMod guide), ii) 16,321 SF semi-subterranean garage with an elevator below the upper floor areas.

Construction Phase - Demo: 2 months, Site Prep: 1 month, Grading: 1 month, Construction: 12 months, paving 1 month and architectural finishes 3 months.

Grading - Grading 4,760 CY cut; 132 CY fill.

Demolition - Demo includes a 424 W Milford (1,202SF, plus 768 SF), 430 W Milford (1,012 SF plus 804SF) and 434 W Milford (1,362 SF) Table Name Column Name
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
Default Value
7/22/2024
7/8/2024
New Value
8/8/2025
6/4/2025
4/1/2024
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase 2/14/2024
138 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblLandUse
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
LandUseSquareFeet
LandUseSquareFeet
LotAcreage
2/19/2024
7/15/2024
2/15/2024
7/16/2024
2/20/2024
2/16/2024
7/9/2024
2/15/2024
43,000.00
14,400.00

0.69 6/3/2024
7/11/2025
5/1/2024
6/12/2025
6/4/2024
5/2/2024
6/5/2025
4/2/2024
30,665.00
16,321.00

0.48 tblLandUse
tblLandUse
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.32 0.01
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 578.00

2.0 Emissions Summary
139 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024
2025

0.0911

0.8740

1.1997

0.4144

1.1997

1.0218

0.5998

1.0218

3.6800e0030.1747

0.0301

0.1747

0.0369

0.0177

0.0369

0.2116

0.0478

0.2116

0.0581 0.0343

0.0164

0.0343

0.0924

0.0244

0.0924

0.0000

0.0000
347.6628 347.6628 0.0479

0.0227

0.0479

0.0322 358.4438

1.1400e0038.0500e003100.6975 100.6975 1.4600e- 101.6984 003
Maximum 3.6800e0030.0581 347.6628 347.6628 0.0322 358.4438 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024
2025

0.0911

0.8740

1.1997

0.4144

1.1997

1.0218

0.5998

1.0218

3.6800e0030.1747

0.0301

0.1747

0.0369

0.0177

0.0369

0.2116

0.0478

0.2116

0.0581 0.0343

0.0164

0.0343

0.0924

0.0244

0.0924

0.0000

0.0000
347.6627 347.6627 0.0479

0.0227

0.0479

0.0322 358.4437

1.1400e0038.0500e003100.6974 100.6974 1.4600e- 101.6983 003
Maximum 3.6800e0030.0581 347.6627 347.6627 0.0322 358.4437 140 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 2-1-2024
5-1-2024
8-1-2024
11-1-2024
2-1-2025
5-1-2025
8-1-2025
4-30-2024
7-31-2024
10-31-2024
1-31-2025
4-30-2025
7-31-2025
9-30-2025
Highest

0.2038

0.6929

0.2309

0.2253

0.2060

0.8800

0.1161

0.8800

0.2038

0.6929

0.2309

0.2253

0.2060

0.8800

0.1161

0.8800
141 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area
Energy
Mobile
Waste
Water
Total

0.2759 0.0163

0.0213

0.1056

0.7168 7.2000e0040.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 4.5674

0.0000

4.0152

0.8888

9.4714

9.5023 14.0697 0.0143 3.1000e00414.5200

2.4900e0039.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e003109.5841 109.5841 3.4300e0038.1000e- 109.9112 004

0.0897 0.9207 2.1100e0030.2400 1.5200e0030.2415

0.0000

0.2868

0.0641 1.4100e0030.0655

0.0000

0.1107
195.2517 195.2517 0.0125

0.2373

0.0921

0.3597

8.6000e- 198.1279
003

0.0000

0.0468

0.0000

0.0467

0.0000 4.0152 0.0000 9.9474

28.0143
360.5208

24.1495 25.0383 2.2600e003

0.3680 0.1431 1.6466 2.9700e0030.2400 0.0641 338.4876 347.9590 0.0120 142 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area
Energy
Mobile
Waste
Water
Total

0.2759 0.0163

0.0213

0.1056

0.7168 7.2000e0040.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 4.5674

0.0000

4.0152

0.8888

9.4714

9.5023 14.0697 0.0143 3.1000e00414.5200

2.4900e0039.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e003109.5841 109.5841 3.4300e0038.1000e- 109.9112 004

0.0897 0.9207 2.1100e0030.2400 1.5200e0030.2415

0.0000

0.2868

0.0641 1.4100e0030.0655

0.0000

0.1107
195.2517 195.2517 0.0125

0.2373

0.0921

0.3597

8.6000e- 198.1279
003

0.0000

0.0468

0.0000

0.0467

0.0000 4.0152 0.0000 9.9474

28.0143
360.5208

24.1495 25.0383 2.2600e003

0.3680 0.1431 1.6466 2.9700e0030.2400 0.0641 338.4876 347.9590 0.0120 ROG NOx CO SO2

0.00 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4

0.00 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Week
Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition
Site Preparation
Grading
2/1/2024
4/2/2024
5/2/2024
4/1/2024 5
5 5
10 2 1
3 Site Preparation
Grading
5/1/2024
6/3/2024 2
143 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4 5
6 Building Construction
Paving
Building Construction
Paving
6/4/2024
6/5/2025
6/12/2025
6/4/2025
7/11/2025
8/8/2025
5 5
5 100
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.01
Residential Indoor: 62,097; Residential Outdoor: 20,699; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 979 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Architectural Coating
Offroad Equipment Type
Air Compressors
Amount Usage Hours

6.00 Horse Power Load Factor
1 0.48
4 1
1 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 78
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 9
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Cranes

6.00 8.00

4.00 6.00

6.00 8.00

7.00 7.00

1.00 6.00

8.00 6.00

7.00 7.00

8.00 0.56

0.73 0.29

0.20 0.41

0.41 0.42

0.38 0.40

0.40 0.37

0.37 0.37

0.37 0.37
Demolition 81
Building Construction
Building Construction
Grading
231
Forklifts 89
Graders 187
187
130
80 Site Preparation
Paving
Graders
Pavers
Paving Rollers
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
247
247
97 Grading
Building Construction
Demolition 97
Grading 97
Paving 97
Site Preparation 97
144 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip
Number Number Length
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip
Length Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Hauling
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 23.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
Site Preparation
Grading
2 3
5 7
1 5.00

8.00 0.00

0.00 7.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 578.00

0.00 14.70

14.70 14.70

6.90 6.90

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix

20.00 LD_Mix

20.00 LD_Mix
Building Construction
Paving

38.00 18.00

8.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 0.00

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

3.2 Demolition - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

0.0109 0.0000 0.0109 1.6500e0030.0000 1.6500e0030.0000

0.0000

22.4045

0.0000

22.4045

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

22.5060

0.0132 0.1178 0.1590 2.6000e0045.3800e0035.3800e0035.1400e0035.1400e0034.0600e003

0.0132 0.1178 0.1590 2.6000e0040.0109 5.3800e0030.0163 1.6500e0035.1400e0036.7900e0034.0600e003 145 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

1.0000e0046.3100e0031.7100e0033.0000e0058.5000e0045.0000e0059.0000e0042.3000e0044.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000

0.0000

2.7816

0.0000

1.7921

4.5737

2.7816

0.0000

1.7921

4.5737

1.6000e0044.4000e0042.9173

0.0000

1.8063

4.7236

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.3000e0044.6000e0046.5400e0032.0000e0052.3600e0031.0000e0052.3700e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e0044.0000e0054.0000e005

7.3000e0046.7700e0038.2500e0035.0000e0053.2100e0036.0000e0053.2700e0038.6000e0045.0000e0059.2000e0042.0000e0044.8000e004 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

0.0109 0.0000 0.0109 1.6500e0030.0000 1.6500e0030.0000

0.0000

22.4045

0.0000

22.4045

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

22.5059

0.0132 0.1178 0.1590 2.6000e0045.3800e0035.3800e0035.1400e0035.1400e0034.0600e003

0.0132 0.1178 0.1590 2.6000e0040.0109 5.3800e0030.0163 1.6500e0035.1400e0036.7900e0034.0600e003 146 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

1.0000e0046.3100e0031.7100e0033.0000e0058.5000e0045.0000e0059.0000e0042.3000e0044.0000e0052.8000e0040.0000

0.0000

2.7816

0.0000

1.7921

4.5737

2.7816

0.0000

1.7921

4.5737

1.6000e0044.4000e0042.9173

0.0000

1.8063

4.7236

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.3000e0044.6000e0046.5400e0032.0000e0052.3600e0031.0000e0052.3700e0036.3000e0041.0000e0056.4000e0044.0000e0054.0000e005

7.3000e0046.7700e0038.2500e0035.0000e0053.2100e0036.0000e0053.2700e0038.6000e0045.0000e0059.2000e0042.0000e0044.8000e004

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

5.8300e0030.0000 5.8300e0036.3000e0040.0000 6.3000e0040.0000

0.0000

9.4030

0.0000

9.4030

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

9.4790

5.4800e0030.0616 0.0428 1.1000e0042.2100e0032.2100e0032.0400e0032.0400e0033.0400e003

5.4800e0030.0616 0.0428 1.1000e0045.8300e0032.2100e0038.0400e0036.3000e0042.0400e0032.6700e0033.0400e003 147 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.4584

0.0000

0.4584

0.0000

0.4621

1.6000e0041.2000e0041.6700e0036.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005

1.6000e0041.2000e0041.6700e0036.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

5.8300e0030.0000 5.8300e0036.3000e0040.0000 6.3000e0040.0000

0.0000

9.4030

0.0000

9.4030

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

9.4790

5.4800e0030.0616 0.0428 1.1000e0042.2100e0032.2100e0032.0400e0032.0400e0033.0400e003

5.4800e0030.0616 0.0428 1.1000e0045.8300e0032.2100e0038.0400e0036.3000e0042.0400e0032.6700e0033.0400e003 148 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.4584

0.0000

0.4584

0.0000

0.4621

1.6000e0041.2000e0041.6700e0036.0000e0046.1000e0041.6000e0041.6000e0041.0000e0051.0000e005

3.4 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

0.0611 0.0000 0.0611 0.0295 0.0000 0.0295 0.0000

0.0000

14.2370

0.0000

14.2370

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

14.3521

0.0105 0.1119 0.0638 1.6000e0044.6000e0034.6000e0034.2300e0034.2300e0034.6000e003

0.0105 0.1119 0.0638 1.6000e0040.0611 4.6000e0030.0657 0.0295 4.2300e0030.0338 4.6000e003 149 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Grading - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

6.9100e0030.4239

0.0000

0.1151

0.0000

1.8700e0030.0572

0.0000

3.0400e0030.0602

0.0000

0.0157

0.0000

2.9100e0030.0186

0.0000

0.0000
186.9523 186.9523 0.0106

0.0000

0.0297

0.0000
196.0704

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.7668

0.0000

2.7000e- 0.7668
004

2.0000e0042.8000e0031.0000e0051.0100e0031.0000e0051.0100e0032.7000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0042.0000e0052.0000e0050.7729

7.1800e0030.4241 0.1179 1.8800e0030.0582 3.0500e0030.0613 0.0160 2.9200e0030.0189 187.7191 187.7191 0.0106 0.0297 196.8433 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

0.0611 0.0000 0.0611 0.0295 0.0000 0.0295 0.0000

0.0000

14.2370

0.0000

14.2370

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

14.3521

0.0105 0.1119 0.0638 1.6000e0044.6000e0034.6000e0034.2300e0034.2300e0034.6000e003

0.0105 0.1119 0.0638 1.6000e0040.0611 4.6000e0030.0657 0.0295 4.2300e0030.0338 4.6000e003 150 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Grading - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

6.9100e0030.4239

0.0000

0.1151

0.0000

1.8700e0030.0572

0.0000

3.0400e0030.0602

0.0000

0.0157

0.0000

2.9100e0030.0186

0.0000

0.0000
186.9523 186.9523 0.0106

0.0000

0.0297

0.0000
196.0704

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.7668

0.0000

2.7000e- 0.7668
004

2.0000e0042.8000e0031.0000e0051.0100e0031.0000e0051.0100e0032.7000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0042.0000e0052.0000e0050.7729

7.1800e0030.4241 0.1179 1.8800e0030.0582 3.0500e0030.0613 0.0160 2.9200e0030.0189 187.7191 187.7191 0.0106 0.0297 196.8433

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0449 0.4510 0.5336 8.6000e0040.0213 0.0213 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 75.6830 75.6830 0.0245 0.0000 76.2950 Total 0.0449 0.4510 0.5336 8.6000e0040.0213 0.0213 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 75.6830 75.6830 0.0245 0.0000 76.2950 151 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.0202

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

9.2706

0.0000

9.2706

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.6000e- 9.6793
004

7.5400e0039.0000e0053.3300e0031.1000e0043.4500e0039.6000e0041.1000e0041.0700e0033.2000e0041.3500e003

8.3600e0036.1400e0030.0872 2.6000e0040.0315 1.7000e0040.0317 8.3600e0031.6000e0048.5200e00323.9134

33.1840

23.9134

33.1840

5.7000e0045.9000e00424.1035

8.9200e- 33.7828
003

0.0264 0.0948 3.5000e0040.0348 2.8000e0040.0351 9.3200e0032.7000e0049.5900e0038.9000e0041.9400e003 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0449 0.4510 0.5336 8.6000e0040.0213 0.0213 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 75.6829 75.6829 0.0245 0.0000 76.2949 Total 0.0449 0.4510 0.5336 8.6000e0040.0213 0.0213 0.0196 0.0196 0.0000 75.6829 75.6829 0.0245 0.0000 76.2949 152 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.0202

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

9.2706

0.0000

9.2706

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.6000e- 9.6793
004

7.5400e0039.0000e0053.3300e0031.1000e0043.4500e0039.6000e0041.1000e0041.0700e0033.2000e0041.3500e003

8.3600e0036.1400e0030.0872 2.6000e0040.0315 1.7000e0040.0317 8.3600e0031.6000e0048.5200e00323.9134

33.1840

23.9134

33.1840

5.7000e0045.9000e00424.1035

8.9200e- 33.7828
003

0.0264 0.0948 3.5000e0040.0348 2.8000e0040.0351 9.3200e0032.7000e0049.5900e0038.9000e0041.9400e003

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0306 0.3043 0.3901 6.3000e0040.0134 0.0134 0.0123 0.0123 0.0000 55.6641 55.6641 0.0180 0.0000 56.1142 Total 0.0306 0.3043 0.3901 6.3000e0040.0134 0.0134 0.0123 0.0123 0.0000 55.6641 55.6641 0.0180 0.0000 56.1142 153 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.0148

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

6.6907

0.0000

6.6907

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.0000e- 6.9861
004

5.4600e0037.0000e0052.4500e0038.0000e0052.5300e0037.1000e0048.0000e0057.9000e0042.3000e0049.7000e004

5.7600e0034.0500e0030.0598 1.9000e0040.0231 1.2000e0040.0233 6.1500e0031.1000e0046.2600e00316.9805

23.6711

16.9805

23.6711

3.8000e0044.1000e00417.1108

6.1600e- 24.0969
003

0.0189 0.0652 2.6000e0040.0256 2.0000e0040.0258 6.8600e0031.9000e0047.0500e0036.1000e0041.3800e003 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0306 0.3043 0.3901 6.3000e0040.0134 0.0134 0.0123 0.0123 0.0000 55.6641 55.6641 0.0180 0.0000 56.1141 Total 0.0306 0.3043 0.3901 6.3000e0040.0134 0.0134 0.0123 0.0123 0.0000 55.6641 55.6641 0.0180 0.0000 56.1141 154 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.0148

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

6.6907

0.0000

6.6907

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

4.0000e- 6.9861
004

5.4600e0037.0000e0052.4500e0038.0000e0052.5300e0037.1000e0048.0000e0057.9000e0042.3000e0049.7000e004

5.7600e0034.0500e0030.0598 1.9000e0040.0231 1.2000e0040.0233 6.1500e0031.1000e0046.2600e00316.9805

23.6711

16.9805

23.6711

3.8000e0044.1000e00417.1108

6.1600e- 24.0969
003

0.0189 0.0652 2.6000e0040.0256 2.0000e0040.0258 6.8600e0031.9000e0047.0500e0036.1000e0041.3800e003

3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road
Paving
Total

7.6100e0030.0664 0.0949 1.5000e0042.9500e0032.9500e0032.7600e0032.7600e0030.0000

0.0000

12.6912

0.0000

12.6912

0.0000

3.7000e0030.0000

0.0000

12.7836

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.6100e0030.0664 0.0949 1.5000e0042.9500e0032.9500e0032.7600e0032.7600e00312.6912 12.6912 3.7000e00312.7836 155 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

1.9565

0.0000

1.9565

0.0000

1.9715

6.6000e0044.7000e0046.8900e0032.0000e0052.6700e0031.0000e0052.6800e0037.1000e0041.0000e0057.2000e0044.0000e0055.0000e005

6.6000e0044.7000e0046.8900e0032.0000e0052.6700e0031.0000e0052.6800e0037.1000e0041.0000e0057.2000e0044.0000e0055.0000e005 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road
Paving
Total

7.6100e0030.0664 0.0949 1.5000e0042.9500e0032.9500e0032.7600e0032.7600e0030.0000

0.0000

12.6912

0.0000

12.6912

0.0000

3.7000e0030.0000

0.0000

12.7836

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.6100e0030.0664 0.0949 1.5000e0042.9500e0032.9500e0032.7600e0032.7600e00312.6912 12.6912 3.7000e00312.7836 156 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

1.9565

0.0000

1.9565

0.0000

1.9715

6.6000e0044.7000e0046.8900e0032.0000e0052.6700e0031.0000e0052.6800e0037.1000e0041.0000e0057.2000e0044.0000e0055.0000e005

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total

0.8250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

5.3618

0.0000

5.3618

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

5.3691

3.5900e0030.0241 0.0380 6.0000e0051.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0032.9000e004

0.8285 0.0241 0.0380 6.0000e0051.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0032.9000e004 157 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

1.3526

0.0000

1.3526

0.0000

1.3630

4.6000e0043.2000e0044.7600e0031.0000e0051.8400e0031.0000e0051.8500e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005

4.6000e0043.2000e0044.7600e0031.0000e0051.8400e0031.0000e0051.8500e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total

0.8250 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

5.3618

0.0000

5.3618

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

5.3691

3.5900e0030.0241 0.0380 6.0000e0051.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0032.9000e004

0.8285 0.0241 0.0380 6.0000e0051.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0031.0800e0032.9000e004 158 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

1.3526

0.0000

1.3526

0.0000

1.3630

4.6000e0043.2000e0044.7600e0031.0000e0051.8400e0031.0000e0051.8500e0034.9000e0041.0000e0055.0000e0043.0000e0053.0000e005

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
159 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0897

0.0897

0.1056

0.9207

2.1100e0030.2400

0.2400

1.5200e0030.2415

0.2415

0.0641

1.4100e0030.0655

0.0655

0.0000

0.0000
195.2517 195.2517 0.0125

0.0125

8.6000e- 198.1279
003
Unmitigated 2.1100e0031.5200e0031.4100e003195.2517 195.2517 8.6000e- 198.1279 003

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Total
191.35

0.00 194.79

0.00 154.37

0.00 637,499 637,499
191.35 194.79 154.37 637,499 637,499

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments High Rise
Unenclosed Parking with

14.70 16.60

5.90 8.40

8.70 6.90

40.20 0.00

19.20 0.00

40.60 0.00
86 0
11 0
3 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments High Rise 0.540893 0.062748 0.186142

0.186142

0.127785

0.023768

0.006610

0.012333 0.009205

0.009205

0.000817 0.000491 0.024860 0.000754 0.003594
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.540893 0.062748 0.012333 0.000817 0.000491 0.024860 0.000754 0.003594

5.0 Energy Detail
160 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

84.8997

24.6844

84.8997

24.6844

2.9500e0033.6000e00485.0801

85.0801

24.8311

24.8311
Electricity
Unmitigated

2.9500e0033.6000e004
NaturalGas
Mitigated

2.4900e0030.0213

0.0213

9.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0034.7000e0044.5000e004 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

2.4900e0039.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0034.7000e0044.5000e004 161 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
462569
0 2.4900e0030.0213

0.0000

9.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0030.0000

0.0000

24.6844

0.0000

24.6844

0.0000

4.7000e0044.5000e00424.8311
Unenclosed 0.0000
Parking with
Elevator

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.4900e0030.0213 9.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0030.0000 24.6844 24.6844 4.7000e0044.5000e00424.8311 Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
462569
0 2.4900e0030.0213

0.0000

9.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0030.0000

0.0000

24.6844

0.0000

24.6844

0.0000

4.7000e0044.5000e00424.8311
Unenclosed 0.0000
Parking with
Elevator

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.4900e0030.0213 9.0700e0031.4000e0041.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0031.7200e0030.0000 24.6844 24.6844 4.7000e0044.5000e00424.8311 162 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity Total CO2
Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
165572
31662.7

71.2705

13.6292

2.4800e0033.0000e00471.4219
Unenclosed 13.6582
Parking with
Elevator

4.7000e0046.0000e005
Total 84.8997 2.9500e0033.6000e00485.0801
Mitigated
Electricity Total CO2
Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise
165572
31662.7

71.2705

13.6292

2.4800e0033.0000e00471.4219
Unenclosed 13.6582
Parking with
Elevator

4.7000e0046.0000e005
Total 84.8997 2.9500e0033.6000e00485.0801

6.0 Area Detail
163 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2759

0.2759

0.0163

0.7168

7.2000e0040.0435

0.0435

4.5674

9.5023

14.0697 0.0143

0.0143

3.1000e00414.5200
Unmitigated 7.2000e- 14.5200
004

14.0697 3.1000e004
164 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

9.8200e0030.0000

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

4.5674

0.0000

4.5674

0.0000

8.7770

0.7253

9.5023

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000

13.7773

0.7427

14.5200
Consumer
Products

0.1119

0.1408

0.0133

0.2759
Hearth
Landscaping
Total

0.0112 0.2734

0.4435

0.7168

7.0000e00413.3444

0.7253

3.1000e004

5.1100e0032.0000e0052.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e0037.0000e0040.0000

0.0163 7.2000e0040.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 14.0697 0.0143 3.1000e004 165 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

9.8200e0030.0000

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

0.0411

0.0000

4.5674

0.0000

4.5674

0.0000

8.7770

0.7253

9.5023

0.0000

0.0136

0.0000

13.7773

0.7427

14.5200
Consumer
Products

0.1119

0.1408

0.0133

0.2759
Hearth
Landscaping
Total

0.0112 0.2734

0.4435

0.7168

7.0000e00413.3444

0.7253

3.1000e004

5.1100e0032.0000e0052.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e0032.4600e0037.0000e0040.0000

0.0163 7.2000e0040.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 14.0697 0.0143 3.1000e004

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
166 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 25.0383

25.0383

0.0921

2.2600e00328.0143
Unmitigated 2.2600e- 28.0143
003

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2
door Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments High 2.80162 / 25.0383

0.0000

0.0921

0.0000

2.2600e00328.0143

0.0000
Rise 1.76624
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000
Total 25.0383 0.0921 2.2600e00328.0143
167 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2
door Use
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments High 2.80162 / 25.0383

0.0000

0.0921

0.0000

2.2600e00328.0143

0.0000
Rise 1.76624
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000
Total 25.0383 0.0921 2.2600e00328.0143

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.0152

4.0152

0.2373

0.0000

9.9474
Unmitigated 9.9474 168 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise

19.78 0

4.0152

0.0000

0.2373

0.0000

9.9474
Unenclosed 0.0000
Parking with
Elevator
Total 4.0152 0.2373 0.0000 9.9474
Mitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments High
Rise

19.78 0

4.0152

0.0000

0.2373

0.0000

9.9474
Unenclosed 0.0000
Parking with
Elevator
Total 4.0152 0.2373 0.0000 9.9474

9.0 Operational Offroad
169 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 33 Date: 2/17/2023 11:11 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Boiler Rating
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number
Number
Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type

11.0 Vegetation
170 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project
South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size

43.00 36.00
Metric
Dwelling Unit
Space
Lot Acreage

0.48 Floor Surface Area
30,665.00
Population
Apartments High Rise 123
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.01 16,321.00 0

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004

Construction Phase - Demo: 2 months, Site Prep: 1 month, Grading: 1 month, Construction: 12 months, paving 1 month and architectural finishes 3 months.

Grading - Grading 4,760 CY cut; 132 CY fill.

Demolition - Demo includes a 424 W Milford (1,202SF, plus 768 SF), 430 W Milford (1,012 SF plus 804SF) and 434 W Milford (1,362 SF) Table Name Column Name
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
Default Value
7/22/2024
7/8/2024
New Value
8/8/2025
6/4/2025
4/1/2024
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase 2/14/2024
171 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblLandUse
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
LandUseSquareFeet
LandUseSquareFeet
LotAcreage
2/19/2024
7/15/2024
2/15/2024
7/16/2024
2/20/2024
2/16/2024
7/9/2024
2/15/2024
43,000.00
14,400.00

0.69 6/3/2024
7/11/2025
5/1/2024
6/12/2025
6/4/2024
5/2/2024
6/5/2025
4/2/2024
30,665.00
16,321.00

0.48 tblLandUse
tblLandUse
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.32 0.01
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 578.00

2.0 Emissions Summary
172 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024
2025

1.5557

40.0907

44.7183

6.1108

15.7594

9.6261

0.1775

0.0166

0.1775

10.4564

0.4696

0.6646

0.2716

0.6646

11.1210

0.7145

3.9779

0.1256

3.9779

0.6211

0.2575

0.6211

4.5990

0.3509

4.5990

0.0000

0.0000
19,352.92 19,352.92
39 39

1.4571

0.3696

1.4571

2.8481

0.0268

2.8481
20,238.09
21 1,590.963 1,590.963 1,608.176
5 5 3
Maximum 44.7183 15.7594 10.4564 11.1210 19,352.92 19,352.92 39 39
20,238.09
21 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024
2025

1.5557

40.0907

44.7183

6.1108

15.7594

9.6261

0.1775

0.0166

0.1775

10.4564

0.4696

0.6646

0.2716

0.6646

11.1210

0.7145

3.9779

0.1256

3.9779

0.6211

0.2575

0.6211

4.5990

0.3509

4.5990

0.0000

0.0000
19,352.92 19,352.92
39 39

1.4571

0.3696

1.4571

2.8481

0.0268

2.8481
20,238.09
21 1,590.963 1,590.963 1,608.176
5 5 3
Maximum 44.7183 15.7594 10.4564 11.1210 19,352.92 19,352.92 39 39
20,238.09
21 173 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
174 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

12.0411

0.0137

0.5413

12.5960

0.9330

0.1168

0.5569

1.6067

25.4156

0.0497

5.3993

30.8646

0.0560 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173 1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003

0.0126 1.4026 8.7300e0031.4113 0.3738 8.1200e0030.3819 1,280.402 1,280.402 0.0774 0.0521 1,297.869 7 7 9

0.0693 1.4026 3.3226 4.7251 0.3738 3.3219 3.6957 402.7775 2,209.893 2,612.671 1.2876 0.0822 2,669.353 8 3 5
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area
Energy
Mobile
Total

12.0411

0.0137

0.5413

12.5960

0.9330

0.1168

0.5569

1.6067

25.4156

0.0497

5.3993

30.8646

0.0560 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173 1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003

0.0126 1.4026 8.7300e0031.4113 0.3738 8.1200e0030.3819 1,280.402 1,280.402 0.0774 0.0521 1,297.869 7 7 9

0.0693 1.4026 3.3226 4.7251 0.3738 3.3219 3.6957 402.7775 2,209.893 2,612.671 1.2876 0.0822 2,669.353 8 3 5
175 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG

0.00 NOx

0.00 CO SO2

0.00 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4

0.00 N20

0.00 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Week
Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 2/1/2024
4/2/2024
5/2/2024
6/4/2024
6/5/2025
6/12/2025
4/1/2024
5/1/2024
6/3/2024
6/4/2025
7/11/2025
8/8/2025
5 5
5 5
5 5
10 2 1
3 4
5 6
Site Preparation
Grading
Site Preparation
Grading 2
Building Construction
Paving
Building Construction
Paving
100
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5
Acres of Paving: 0.01
Residential Indoor: 62,097; Residential Outdoor: 20,699; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 979 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Architectural Coating
Offroad Equipment Type
Air Compressors
Amount Usage Hours

6.00 Horse Power Load Factor
1 0.48
4 1
1 2
78 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 9
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Cranes

6.00 8.00

4.00 6.00

0.56 0.73

0.29 0.20
Demolition 81
Building Construction
Building Construction
231
Forklifts 89
176 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Grading Graders 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 1
1 1

6.00 8.00

7.00 7.00

1.00 6.00

8.00 6.00

7.00 7.00

8.00 187
187
130
80 0.41

0.41 0.42

0.38 0.40

0.40 0.37

0.37 0.37

0.37 0.37
Site Preparation
Paving
Graders
Pavers
Paving Rollers
Demolition
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
247
247
Building Construction 97
Demolition
Grading
97 97
Paving 97
Site Preparation 97
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip
Number Number Length
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Hauling
Length Length
Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 23.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
HHDT
Site Preparation
Grading
2 3
5 7
1 5.00

8.00 0.00

0.00 7.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 578.00

0.00 14.70

14.70 14.70

6.90 6.90

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix

20.00 LD_Mix

20.00 LD_Mix
Building Construction
Paving

38.00 18.00

8.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 0.00

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
177 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5068 0.0000

0.2504

0.5068

0.2504

0.7571

0.0767 0.0000

0.2392

0.0767

0.2392

0.3159

0.0000 0.0000

0.6156 5.4776 7.3949 0.0120 1,148.687 1,148.687 0.2080 1,153.887 4 4 0

0.6156 5.4776 7.3949 0.0120 0.5068 0.0767 1,148.687 1,148.687 0.2080 1,153.887 4 4 0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

4.9200e0030.2783

0.0000

0.0191

0.2975

0.0792

0.0000

0.3267

0.4059

1.2900e0030.0402

0.0000

0.1118

0.1520

2.1000e0030.0423

0.0000

0.1124

0.1547

0.0110

0.0000

0.0296

0.0407

2.0100e0030.0130

0.0000

0.0302

0.0432
142.5475 142.5475 8.0700e0030.0227

0.0000
149.5000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0298

0.0347

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5000e0046.0000e0045.5000e00496.0663 96.0663 2.1700e0032.1000e00396.7477

2.2400e- 246.2477
003

2.7000e0032.5600e003238.6139 238.6139 0.0102 0.0248
178 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

0.5068 0.0000

0.2504

0.5068

0.2504

0.7571

0.0767 0.0000

0.2392

0.0767

0.2392

0.3159

0.0000 0.0000

0.6156 5.4776 7.3949 0.0120 0.0000 1,148.687 1,148.687 0.2080 1,153.887 4 4 0

0.6156 5.4776 7.3949 0.0120 0.5068 0.0767 0.0000 1,148.687 1,148.687 0.2080 1,153.887 4 4 0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

4.9200e0030.2783

0.0000

0.0191

0.2975

0.0792

0.0000

0.3267

0.4059

1.2900e0030.0402

0.0000

0.1118

0.1520

2.1000e0030.0423

0.0000

0.1124

0.1547

0.0110

0.0000

0.0296

0.0407

2.0100e0030.0130

0.0000

0.0302

0.0432
142.5475 142.5475 8.0700e0030.0227

0.0000
149.5000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0298

0.0347

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.5000e0046.0000e0045.5000e00496.0663 96.0663 2.1700e0032.1000e00396.7477

2.2400e- 246.2477
003

2.7000e0032.5600e003238.6139 238.6139 0.0102 0.0248
179 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5303 0.0000

0.2012

0.5303

0.2012

0.7315

0.0573 0.0000

0.1851

0.0573

0.1851

0.2424

0.0000
942.2742 942.2742
942.2742 942.2742

0.0000

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e0030.3048 949.8930

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e- 949.8930
003

0.5303 0.0573 0.3048
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.0149

0.0000

0.1633

0.0000

0.0559

0.0000

0.0562

0.0000

0.0148

0.0000

0.0151

0.0000

9.5700e0034.8000e0043.0000e0042.8000e00448.0332

48.0332

1.0900e0031.0500e00348.3739

9.5700e- 48.3739
003

4.8000e0043.0000e0042.8000e0041.0900e0031.0500e003 180 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

0.5303 0.0000

0.2012

0.5303

0.2012

0.7315

0.0573 0.0000

0.1851

0.0573

0.1851

0.2424

0.0000
942.2742 942.2742
942.2742 942.2742

0.0000

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e0030.0000 0.3048 949.8930

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e- 949.8930
003

0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.3048
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.0149

0.0000

0.1633

0.0000

0.0559

0.0000

0.0562

0.0000

0.0148

0.0000

0.0151

0.0000

9.5700e0034.8000e0043.0000e0042.8000e00448.0332

48.0332

1.0900e0031.0500e00348.3739

9.5700e- 48.3739
003

4.8000e0043.0000e0042.8000e0041.0900e0031.0500e003 181 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3119 0.0000

0.4001

5.3119

0.4001

5.7120

2.5686 0.0000

0.3681

2.5686

0.3681

2.9367

0.0000 0.0000

0.9132 9.7297 5.5468 0.0141 1,364.662 1,364.662 0.4414 1,375.696 3 3 2

0.9132 9.7297 5.5468 0.0141 5.3119 2.5686 1,364.662 1,364.662 0.4414 1,375.696 3 3 2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.6187

0.0000

0.0238

0.6425

34.9732

0.0000

0.0153

34.9886

9.9513

0.0000

0.2614

10.2126

0.1627

0.0000

5.0550

0.0000

0.0894

5.1445

0.2640

0.0000

5.3191

0.0000

0.0899

5.4090

1.3856

0.0000

0.0237

1.4093

0.2526

0.0000

1.6382

0.0000

0.0242

1.6624
17,911.40 17,911.40 1.0140

0.0000

2.8464

0.0000
18,784.99
86 86 77

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.6000e0044.8000e0044.4000e00476.8531 76.8531 1.7400e0031.6800e00377.3982

0.1634 0.2645 0.2530 17,988.26 17,988.26
16 16

1.0157 2.8481 18,862.39
59 182 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Grading - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total

5.3119 0.0000

0.4001

5.3119

0.4001

5.7120

2.5686 0.0000

0.3681

2.5686

0.3681

2.9367

0.0000 0.0000

0.9132 9.7297 5.5468 0.0141 0.0000 1,364.662 1,364.662 0.4414 1,375.696 3 3 2

0.9132 9.7297 5.5468 0.0141 5.3119 2.5686 0.0000 1,364.662 1,364.662 0.4414 1,375.696 3 3 2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.6187

0.0000

0.0238

0.6425

34.9732

0.0000

0.0153

34.9886

9.9513

0.0000

0.2614

10.2126

0.1627

0.0000

5.0550

0.0000

0.0894

5.1445

0.2640

0.0000

5.3191

0.0000

0.0899

5.4090

1.3856

0.0000

0.0237

1.4093

0.2526

0.0000

1.6382

0.0000

0.0242

1.6624
17,911.40 17,911.40 1.0140

0.0000

2.8464

0.0000
18,784.99
86 86 77

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.6000e0044.8000e0044.4000e00476.8531 76.8531 1.7400e0031.6800e00377.3982

0.1634 0.2645 0.2530 17,988.26 17,988.26
16 16

1.0157 2.8481 18,862.39
59 183 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5950 5.9739 7.0675 0.0114 0.2824 0.2824 0.2598 0.2598 1,104.983 1,104.983 0.3574 1,113.917 4 4 7
Total 0.5950 5.9739 7.0675 0.0114 0.2824 0.2824 0.2598 0.2598 1,104.983 1,104.983 0.3574 1,113.917 4 4 7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.2553

0.0727

0.3280

0.0000

0.0984

1.2414

1.3398

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4270

0.4733

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1148

0.1291

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0196

0.0000

7.5600e0031.2500e0031.4800e0031.4200e003135.2476 135.2476 4.6100e003141.2062

0.1132 3.6100e0032.2800e0032.1000e003365.0520 365.0520 8.2600e0038.0000e- 367.6414 003

0.1208 4.8600e0033.7600e0033.5200e003500.2996 500.2996 0.0129 0.0276 508.8476 184 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5950 5.9739 7.0675 0.0114 0.2824 0.2824 0.2598 0.2598 0.0000 1,104.983 1,104.983 0.3574 1,113.917 4 4 7
Total 0.5950 5.9739 7.0675 0.0114 0.2824 0.2824 0.2598 0.2598 0.0000 1,104.983 1,104.983 0.3574 1,113.917 4 4 7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.2553

0.0727

0.3280

0.0000

0.0984

1.2414

1.3398

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4270

0.4733

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1148

0.1291

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0196

0.0000

7.5600e0031.2500e0031.4800e0031.4200e003135.2476 135.2476 4.6100e003141.2062

0.1132 3.6100e0032.2800e0032.1000e003365.0520 365.0520 8.2600e0038.0000e- 367.6414 003

0.1208 4.8600e0033.7600e0033.5200e003500.2996 500.2996 0.0129 0.0276 508.8476 185 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5510 5.4820 7.0282 0.0114 0.2413 0.2413 0.2220 0.2220 1,105.571 1,105.571 0.3576 1,114.510 1 1 2
Total 0.5510 5.4820 7.0282 0.0114 0.2413 0.2413 0.2220 0.2220 1,105.571 1,105.571 0.3576 1,114.510 1 1 2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.2541

0.0654

0.3194

0.0000

0.0969

1.1565

1.2534

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4269

0.4732

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1146

0.1290

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0193

0.0000

7.3900e0031.2300e0031.4900e0031.4200e003132.7825 132.7825 4.6300e003138.6416

0.1060 3.4900e0032.1700e0032.0000e003352.6099 352.6099 7.4500e0037.4800e- 355.0245 003

0.1134 4.7200e0033.6600e0033.4200e003485.3924 485.3924 0.0121 0.0268 493.6661 186 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5510 5.4820 7.0282 0.0114 0.2413 0.2413 0.2220 0.2220 0.0000 1,105.571 1,105.571 0.3576 1,114.510 1 1 2
Total 0.5510 5.4820 7.0282 0.0114 0.2413 0.2413 0.2220 0.2220 0.0000 1,105.571 1,105.571 0.3576 1,114.510 1 1 2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.2541

0.0654

0.3194

0.0000

0.0969

1.1565

1.2534

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4269

0.4732

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1146

0.1290

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0193

0.0000

7.3900e0031.2300e0031.4900e0031.4200e003132.7825 132.7825 4.6300e003138.6416

0.1060 3.4900e0032.1700e0032.0000e003352.6099 352.6099 7.4500e0037.4800e- 355.0245 003

0.1134 4.7200e0033.6600e0033.4200e003485.3924 485.3924 0.0121 0.0268 493.6661 187 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5638

0.0000

0.5638

4.9206 7.0257 0.0113 0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046
1,036.271 1,036.271 0.3019 1,043.817
1 1 9

0.0000 0.0000

4.9206 7.0257 0.0113 1,036.271 1,036.271 0.3019 1,043.817 1 1 9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.0502

0.0000

0.0310

0.0000

0.5478

0.0000

0.2012

0.0000

0.2022

0.0000

0.0534

0.0000

0.0543

0.0000

1.6500e0031.0300e0039.5000e004167.0257 167.0257 3.5300e0033.5400e- 168.1695 003

1.6500e0031.0300e0039.5000e004167.0257 167.0257 3.5300e0033.5400e- 168.1695 003
188 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Paving - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road
Paving
Total

0.5638

0.0000

0.5638

4.9206 7.0257 0.0113 0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046

0.0000 1,036.271 1,036.271 0.3019 1,043.817
1 1 9

0.0000 0.0000

4.9206 7.0257 0.0113 0.0000 1,036.271 1,036.271 0.3019 1,043.817 1 1 9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.0502

0.0000

0.0310

0.0000

0.5478

0.0000

0.2012

0.0000

0.2022

0.0000

0.0534

0.0000

0.0543

0.0000

1.6500e0031.0300e0039.5000e004167.0257 167.0257 3.5300e0033.5400e- 168.1695 003

1.6500e0031.0300e0039.5000e004167.0257 167.0257 3.5300e0033.5400e- 168.1695 003
189 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

39.2835

0.1709

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481 281.4481
281.4481 281.4481

0.0000

1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0154 281.8319

39.4543 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 281.8319
003

0.0154
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.0223

0.0000

0.0138

0.0000

0.2435

0.0000

0.0894

0.0000

0.0899

0.0000

0.0237

0.0000

0.0241

0.0000

7.3000e0044.6000e0044.2000e00474.2337

74.2337

1.5700e0031.5700e00374.7420

7.3000e- 74.7420
004

4.6000e0044.2000e0041.5700e0031.5700e003
190 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating
Off-Road
Total

39.2835

0.1709

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481 281.4481
281.4481 281.4481

0.0000

1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0000 0.0154 281.8319

39.4543 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 281.8319
003

0.0000 0.0154
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000

0.0223

0.0000

0.0138

0.0000

0.2435

0.0000

0.0894

0.0000

0.0899

0.0000

0.0237

0.0000

0.0241

0.0000

7.3000e0044.6000e0044.2000e00474.2337

74.2337

1.5700e0031.5700e00374.7420

7.3000e- 74.7420
004

4.6000e0044.2000e0041.5700e0031.5700e003
191 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.5413

0.5413

0.5569

5.3993

0.0126

1.4026

8.7300e0031.4113

1.4113

0.3738

8.1200e0030.3819

0.3819
1,280.402 1,280.402 0.0774

0.0774

0.0521

0.0521
1,297.869
7 7 9
Unmitigated 8.7300e0038.1200e0031,280.402 1,280.402 1,297.869 7 7 9

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Total
191.35

0.00 194.79

0.00 154.37

0.00 637,499 637,499
191.35 194.79 154.37 637,499 637,499

14.70 16.60

5.90 8.40

8.70 6.90

40.20 0.00

19.20 0.00

40.60 0.00
86 0
11 0
3 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
192 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments High Rise 0.540893 0.062748 0.186142 0.127785 0.023768 0.006610 0.012333 0.009205 0.000817 0.000491 0.024860 0.000754 0.003594 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.540893 0.062748 0.186142 0.127785 0.023768 0.006610 0.012333 0.009205 0.000817 0.000491 0.024860 0.000754 0.003594

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0137

0.1168

0.0497

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
193 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise
1267.31
0 0.0137

0.0000

0.1168

0.0000

0.0497

0.0000

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1168 0.0497 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise

1.26731
0 0.0137

0.0000

0.1168

0.0000

0.0497

0.0000

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1168 0.0497 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003

6.0 Area Detail
194 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 12.0411

12.0411

0.9330

25.4156

0.0560

3.3044

3.3044
402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1.2073

1.2073

0.0273

0.0273
1,221.502
2 Unmitigated 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1,221.502
2 195 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0538

0.6130

11.2676

0.1068

12.0411

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer 0.0000
Products
Hearth
Landscaping
Total

0.8922

0.0409

0.9330

21.8677

3.5479

0.0558 402.7775 774.0000 1,176.777
5 1.2012 0.0273 1,214.953
1 1.9000e0046.3956 6.3956 6.1400e0036.5491

25.4156 0.0560 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 196 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0538

0.6130

11.2676

0.1068

12.0411

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer 0.0000
Products
Hearth
Landscaping
Total

0.8922

0.0409

0.9330

21.8677

3.5479

0.0558 402.7775 774.0000 1,176.777
5 1.2012 0.0273 1,214.953
1 1.9000e0046.3956 6.3956 6.1400e0036.5491

25.4156 0.0560 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
197 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:10 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
198 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project
South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size

43.00 36.00
Metric
Dwelling Unit
Space
Lot Acreage

0.48 Floor Surface Area
30,665.00
Population
Apartments High Rise 123
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.01 16,321.00 0

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004

Construction Phase - Demo: 2 months, Site Prep: 1 month, Grading: 1 month, Construction: 12 months, paving 1 month and architectural finishes 3 months.

Grading - Grading 4,760 CY cut; 132 CY fill.

Demolition - Demo includes a 424 W Milford (1,202SF, plus 768 SF), 430 W Milford (1,012 SF plus 804SF) and 434 W Milford (1,362 SF) Table Name Column Name
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
Default Value
7/22/2024
7/8/2024
New Value
8/8/2025
6/4/2025
4/1/2024
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase 2/14/2024
199 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblConstructionPhase
tblLandUse
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseEndDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
PhaseStartDate
LandUseSquareFeet
LandUseSquareFeet
LotAcreage
2/19/2024
7/15/2024
2/15/2024
7/16/2024
2/20/2024
2/16/2024
7/9/2024
2/15/2024
43,000.00
14,400.00

0.69 6/3/2024
7/11/2025
5/1/2024
6/12/2025
6/4/2024
5/2/2024
6/5/2025
4/2/2024
30,665.00
16,321.00

0.48 tblLandUse
tblLandUse
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.32 0.01
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 578.00

2.0 Emissions Summary
200 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

1.5155

40.0952

46.3891

6.1150

15.8763

9.5517

0.1777

0.0165

0.1777

10.4564

0.4696

0.6652

0.2716

0.6652

11.1216

0.7145

3.9779

0.1256

3.9779

0.6217

0.2575

0.6217

4.5996

0.3509

4.5996

0.0000

0.0000
19,368.85 19,368.85
77 77

1.4548

0.3697

1.4548

2.8515

0.0273

2.8515
20,254.97
93 1,570.789 1,570.789 1,588.153
9 9 9
Maximum 46.3891 15.8763 10.4564 11.1216 19,368.85 19,368.85 77 77
20,254.97
93 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024
2025

1.5155

40.0952

46.3891

6.1150

15.8763

9.5517

0.1777

0.0165

0.1777

10.4564

0.4696

0.6652

0.2716

0.6652

11.1216

0.7145

3.9779

0.1256

3.9779

0.6217

0.2575

0.6217

4.5996

0.3509

4.5996

0.0000

0.0000
19,368.85 19,368.85
77 77

1.4548

0.3697

1.4548

2.8515

0.0273

2.8515
20,254.97
93 1,570.789 1,570.789 1,588.153
9 9 9
Maximum 46.3891 15.8763 10.4564 11.1216 19,368.85 19,368.85 77 77
20,254.97
93 201 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction
202 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

12.0411

0.0137

0.5216

12.5763

0.9330

0.1168

0.5982

1.6480

25.4156

0.0497

5.2257

30.6909

0.0560 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173 1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003

0.0120 1.4026 8.7300e0031.4113 0.3738 8.1200e0030.3819 1,221.748 1,221.748 0.0795 0.0541 1,239.853 7 7 4

0.0687 1.4026 3.3226 4.7251 0.3738 3.3219 3.6957 402.7775 2,151.239 2,554.017 1.2896 0.0842 2,611.337 8 2 0
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area
Energy
Mobile
Total

12.0411

0.0137

0.5216

12.5763

0.9330

0.1168

0.5982

1.6480

25.4156

0.0497

5.2257

30.6909

0.0560 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 3.3044 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173 1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003

0.0120 1.4026 8.7300e0031.4113 0.3738 8.1200e0030.3819 1,221.748 1,221.748 0.0795 0.0541 1,239.853 7 7 4

0.0687 1.4026 3.3226 4.7251 0.3738 3.3219 3.6957 402.7775 2,151.239 2,554.017 1.2896 0.0842 2,611.337 8 2 0
203 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG

0.00 NOx

0.00 CO SO2

0.00 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4

0.00 N20

0.00 CO2e
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction

6.00 Horse Power Load Factor
1 0.48
4 1
1 2
78 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 9
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Cranes

6.00 8.00

4.00 6.00

0.56 0.73

0.29 0.20
Demolition 81
Building Construction
Building Construction
231
Forklifts 89
204 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Grading Graders 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 1
1 1

6.00 8.00

7.00 7.00

1.00 6.00

8.00 6.00

7.00 7.00

8.00 187
187
130
80 0.41

0.41 0.42

0.38 0.40

0.40 0.37

0.37 0.37

8.00 0.00

0.00 7.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 578.00

0.00 14.70

14.70 14.70

6.90 6.90

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix

20.00 LD_Mix

20.00 LD_Mix
Building Construction
Paving

38.00 18.00

8.00 0.00
Architectural Coating 0.00

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
205 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5068 0.0000

0.2504

0.5068

0.2504

0.7571

0.0767 0.0000

0.2392

0.0767

0.2392

0.3159

0.0000 0.0000

0.6156 5.4776 7.3949 0.0120 1,148.687 1,148.687 0.2080 1,153.887 4 4 0

4.5900e0030.2916

0.0000

0.0209

0.3125

0.0803

0.0000

0.2958

0.3761

1.3000e0030.0402

0.0000

0.1118

0.1520

2.1100e0030.0423

0.0000

0.1124

0.1547

0.0110

0.0000

0.0296

0.0407

2.0100e0030.0130

0.0000

0.0302

0.0432
142.7098 142.7098 8.0500e0030.0227

0.0000
149.6696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0316

0.0361

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.0000e0046.0000e0045.5000e00490.4952 90.4952 2.2100e0032.2300e00391.2152

2.2000e- 240.8848
003

2.7100e0032.5600e003233.2050 233.2050 0.0103 0.0249
206 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5068 0.0000

0.2504

0.5068

0.2504

0.7571

0.0767 0.0000

0.2392

0.0767

0.2392

0.3159

0.0000 0.0000

0.6156 5.4776 7.3949 0.0120 0.0000 1,148.687 1,148.687 0.2080 1,153.887 4 4 0

4.5900e0030.2916

0.0000

0.0209

0.3125

0.0803

0.0000

0.2958

0.3761

1.3000e0030.0402

0.0000

0.1118

0.1520

2.1100e0030.0423

0.0000

0.1124

0.1547

0.0110

0.0000

0.0296

0.0407

2.0100e0030.0130

0.0000

0.0302

0.0432
142.7098 142.7098 8.0500e0030.0227

0.0000
149.6696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0316

0.0361

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.0000e0046.0000e0045.5000e00490.4952 90.4952 2.2100e0032.2300e00391.2152

2.2000e- 240.8848
003

2.7100e0032.5600e003233.2050 233.2050 0.0103 0.0249
207 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5303 0.0000

0.2012

0.5303

0.2012

0.7315

0.0573 0.0000

0.1851

0.0573

0.1851

0.2424

0.0000
942.2742 942.2742
942.2742 942.2742

0.0000

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e0030.3048 949.8930

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e- 949.8930
003

0.0000

0.0158

0.0000

0.0105

0.0000

0.1479

0.0000

0.0559

0.0000

0.0562

0.0000

0.0148

0.0000

0.0151

0.0000

4.5000e0043.0000e0042.8000e00445.2476

45.2476

1.1000e0031.1200e00345.6076

4.5000e- 45.6076
004

3.0000e0042.8000e0041.1000e0031.1200e003
208 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5303 0.0000

0.2012

0.5303

0.2012

0.7315

0.0573 0.0000

0.1851

0.0573

0.1851

0.2424

0.0000
942.2742 942.2742
942.2742 942.2742

0.0000

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e0030.0000 0.3048 949.8930

0.4985 5.6040 3.8921 9.7300e- 949.8930
003

0.0000

0.0158

0.0000

0.0105

0.0000

0.1479

0.0000

0.0559

0.0000

0.0562

0.0000

0.0148

0.0000

0.0151

0.0000

4.5000e0043.0000e0042.8000e00445.2476

45.2476

1.1000e0031.1200e00345.6076

4.5000e- 45.6076
004

3.0000e0042.8000e0041.1000e0031.1200e003
209 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3119 0.0000

0.4001

5.3119

0.4001

5.7120

2.5686 0.0000

0.3681

2.5686

0.3681

2.9367

0.0000 0.0000

0.9132 9.7297 5.5468 0.0141 1,364.662 1,364.662 0.4414 1,375.696 3 3 2

0.5771

0.0000

0.0252

0.6024

36.6426

0.0000

0.0167

36.6593

10.0929

0.0000

0.2366

10.3295

0.1629

0.0000

5.0550

0.0000

0.0894

5.1445

0.2646

0.0000

5.3196

0.0000

0.0899

5.4095

1.3856

0.0000

0.0237

1.4093

0.2531

0.0000

1.6388

0.0000

0.0242

1.6629
17,931.79 17,931.79 1.0117

0.0000

2.8497

0.0000
18,806.31
93 93 09

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2000e0044.8000e0044.4000e00472.3961 72.3961 1.7600e0031.7800e00372.9722

0.1636 0.2651 0.2536 18,004.19 18,004.19
54 54

1.0135 2.8515 18,879.28
31 210 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.3119 0.0000

0.4001

5.3119

0.4001

5.7120

2.5686 0.0000

0.3681

2.5686

0.3681

2.9367

0.0000 0.0000

0.9132 9.7297 5.5468 0.0141 0.0000 1,364.662 1,364.662 0.4414 1,375.696 3 3 2

0.5771

0.0000

0.0252

0.6024

36.6426

0.0000

0.0167

36.6593

10.0929

0.0000

0.2366

10.3295

0.1629

0.0000

5.0550

0.0000

0.0894

5.1445

0.2646

0.0000

5.3196

0.0000

0.0899

5.4095

1.3856

0.0000

0.0237

1.4093

0.2531

0.0000

1.6388

0.0000

0.0242

1.6629
17,931.79 17,931.79 1.0117

0.0000

2.8497

0.0000
18,806.31
93 93 09

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

7.2000e0044.8000e0044.4000e00472.3961 72.3961 1.7600e0031.7800e00372.9722

0.1636 0.2651 0.2536 18,004.19 18,004.19
54 54

1.0135 2.8515 18,879.28
31 211 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5950 5.9739 7.0675 0.0114 0.2824 0.2824 0.2598 0.2598 1,104.983 1,104.983 0.3574 1,113.917 4 4 7
Total 0.5950 5.9739 7.0675 0.0114 0.2824 0.2824 0.2598 0.2598 1,104.983 1,104.983 0.3574 1,113.917 4 4 7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.2679

0.0795

0.3474

0.0000

0.1016

1.1240

1.2255

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4270

0.4733

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1148

0.1291

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0197

0.0000

7.2200e0031.2600e0031.4900e0031.4300e003135.4961 135.4961 4.5900e003141.4697

0.1199 3.4000e0032.2800e0032.1000e003343.8817 343.8817 8.3800e0038.4800e- 346.6177 003

0.1271 4.6600e0033.7700e0033.5300e003479.3778 479.3778 0.0130 0.0281 488.0874 212 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0000 0.0000

0.2679

0.0795

0.3474

0.0000

0.1016

1.1240

1.2255

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4270

0.4733

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1148

0.1291

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0197

0.0000

7.2200e0031.2600e0031.4900e0031.4300e003135.4961 135.4961 4.5900e003141.4697

0.1199 3.4000e0032.2800e0032.1000e003343.8817 343.8817 8.3800e0038.4800e- 346.6177 003

0.1271 4.6600e0033.7700e0033.5300e003479.3778 479.3778 0.0130 0.0281 488.0874 213 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.5510 5.4820 7.0282 0.0114 0.2413 0.2413 0.2220 0.2220 1,105.571 1,105.571 0.3576 1,114.510 1 1 2
Total 0.5510 5.4820 7.0282 0.0114 0.2413 0.2413 0.2220 0.2220 1,105.571 1,105.571 0.3576 1,114.510 1 1 2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total

0.0000 0.0000

0.2667

0.0715

0.3381

0.0000

0.1001

1.0478

1.1478

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4269

0.4732

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1146

0.1290

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0193

0.0000

7.0500e0031.2300e0031.5000e0031.4300e003133.0302 133.0302 4.6000e003138.9038

0.1126 3.2900e0032.1700e0032.0000e003332.1886 332.1886 7.5800e0037.9300e- 334.7399 003

0.1196 4.5200e0033.6700e0033.4300e003465.2188 465.2188 0.0122 0.0273 473.6437 214 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0000 0.0000

0.2667

0.0715

0.3381

0.0000

0.1001

1.0478

1.1478

0.0000 0.0000

0.0448

0.4248

0.4696

0.0000 0.0000

0.0463

0.4269

0.4732

0.0000

0.0129

0.1127

0.1256

0.0000 0.0000

0.0143

0.1146

0.1290

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0193

0.0000

7.0500e0031.2300e0031.5000e0031.4300e003133.0302 133.0302 4.6000e003138.9038

0.1126 3.2900e0032.1700e0032.0000e003332.1886 332.1886 7.5800e0037.9300e- 334.7399 003

0.1196 4.5200e0033.6700e0033.4300e003465.2188 465.2188 0.0122 0.0273 473.6437 215 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5638

0.0000

0.5638

4.9206 7.0257 0.0113 0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046
1,036.271 1,036.271 0.3019 1,043.817
1 1 9

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

0.0533

0.0000

0.0338

0.0000

0.4963

0.0000

0.2012

0.0000

0.2022

0.0000

0.0534

0.0000

0.0543

0.0000

1.5600e0031.0300e0039.5000e004157.3525 157.3525 3.5900e0033.7500e- 158.5610 003

1.5600e0031.0300e0039.5000e004157.3525 157.3525 3.5900e0033.7500e- 158.5610 003
216 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.5638

0.0000

0.5638

4.9206 7.0257 0.0113 0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.0000

0.2186

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046

0.0000

0.2046

0.0000 1,036.271 1,036.271 0.3019 1,043.817
1 1 9

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000

0.0533

0.0000

0.0338

0.0000

0.4963

0.0000

0.2012

0.0000

0.2022

0.0000

0.0534

0.0000

0.0543

0.0000

1.5600e0031.0300e0039.5000e004157.3525 157.3525 3.5900e0033.7500e- 158.5610 003

1.5600e0031.0300e0039.5000e004157.3525 157.3525 3.5900e0033.7500e- 158.5610 003
217 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

39.2835

0.1709

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481 281.4481
281.4481 281.4481

0.0000

1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0154 281.8319

39.4543 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 281.8319
003

0.0000

0.0237

0.0000

0.0150

0.0000

0.2206

0.0000

0.0894

0.0000

0.0899

0.0000

0.0237

0.0000

0.0241

0.0000

6.9000e0044.6000e0044.2000e00469.9345

69.9345

1.5900e0031.6700e00370.4716

6.9000e- 70.4716
004

4.6000e0044.2000e0041.5900e0031.6700e003
218 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

39.2835

0.1709

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481 281.4481
281.4481 281.4481

0.0000

1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0000 0.0154 281.8319

39.4543 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e- 281.8319
003

0.0000

0.0237

0.0000

0.0150

0.0000

0.2206

0.0000

0.0894

0.0000

0.0899

0.0000

0.0237

0.0000

0.0241

0.0000

6.9000e0044.6000e0044.2000e00469.9345

69.9345

1.5900e0031.6700e00370.4716

6.9000e- 70.4716
004

4.6000e0044.2000e0041.5900e0031.6700e003
219 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

0.5216

0.5982

5.2257

0.0120

1.4026

8.7300e0031.4113

1.4113

0.3738

8.1200e0030.3819

0.3819
1,221.748 1,221.748 0.0795

0.0795

0.0541

0.0541
1,239.853
7 7 4
Unmitigated 8.7300e0038.1200e0031,221.748 1,221.748 1,239.853 7 7 4

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments High Rise
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Total
191.35

0.00 194.79

0.00 154.37

0.00 637,499 637,499
191.35 194.79 154.37 637,499 637,499

14.70 16.60

5.90 8.40

8.70 6.90

40.20 0.00

19.20 0.00

40.60 0.00
86 0
11 0
3 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
220 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments High Rise 0.540893 0.062748 0.186142 0.127785 0.023768 0.006610 0.012333 0.009205 0.000817 0.000491 0.024860 0.000754 0.003594 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.540893 0.062748 0.186142 0.127785 0.023768 0.006610 0.012333 0.009205 0.000817 0.000491 0.024860 0.000754 0.003594

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

0.0137

0.1168

0.0497

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
221 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments High
Rise
1267.31
0 0.0137

0.0000

0.1168

0.0000

0.0497

0.0000

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator

1.26731
0 0.0137

0.0000

0.1168

0.0000

0.0497

0.0000

7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003
Unenclosed
Parking with
Elevator

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0137 0.1168 0.0497 7.5000e0049.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e0039.4400e003149.0955 149.0955 2.8600e0032.7300e- 149.9815 003

6.0 Area Detail
222 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

12.0411

0.9330

25.4156

0.0560

3.3044

3.3044
402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1.2073

1.2073

0.0273

0.0273
1,221.502
2 Unmitigated 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1,221.502
2 223 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0538

0.6130

11.2676

0.1068

12.0411

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer 0.0000
Products
Hearth
Landscaping
Total

0.8922

0.0409

0.9330

21.8677

3.5479

0.0558 402.7775 774.0000 1,176.777
5 1.2012 0.0273 1,214.953
1 1.9000e0046.3956 6.3956 6.1400e0036.5491

25.4156 0.0560 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 224 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

0.0538

0.6130

11.2676

0.1068

12.0411

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

3.2847

0.0197

3.3044

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer 0.0000
Products
Hearth
Landscaping
Total

0.8922

0.0409

0.9330

21.8677

3.5479

0.0558 402.7775 774.0000 1,176.777
5 1.2012 0.0273 1,214.953
1 1.9000e0046.3956 6.3956 6.1400e0036.5491

25.4156 0.0560 402.7775 780.3956 1,183.173
1 1.2073 0.0273 1,221.502
2 7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
225 of 638
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 28 Date: 2/17/2023 11:07 AM 424 430 434 West Milford 43 Unit DB Project - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
226 of 638
City of Glendale
Disclosure - Campaign Finance Ordinance
Applicants Seeking Entitlement
Submit to Permit Services Center, 633 E. Broadway, Rm. 101.

For more information, call 818-548-3200.
(To be Completed Prior to Preparation of Staff Reports for Consideration of Entitlement Matter by Council, Agency, or Authority, or at Time of Appeal to the City Council if the Applicant is also the Appellant) In August 2011, the Glendale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, which becomes effective on September 9, 2011 (“Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits campaign contributions from “applicants seeking entitlement,” their contractors and subcontractors (including their architects, engineers, and design professionals) while the application is “pending” and for 12 months thereafter. The Ordinance also prohibits Council Members from voting on any matter pertaining to an entitlement if the Council member has received a campaign contribution from the applicant seeking the entitlement, or certain contractors or subcontractors of the applicant, within the 12-month period preceding the vote.

The Applicant and the Owner/Lessor hereby discloses as follows. (If printing, please print legibly. Use additional sheets as necessary.) I. Name of Applicant and Name of Owner/Lessor on whose behalf application is filed:

Full Name Title Business Address City State
CA
Zip
Alen Malekian, AIA
Andre Aboolian
Applicant
Owner
2255 Honolulu Ave. #1A
1146 N. Central Ave. #101
Montrose
Glendale
91020
CA 91202

Page 1 of 3 ends

Glendale City CouncilApril 11, 2023

Glendale City Council
April 11, 2023