Agenda packet, joint meeting — Glendale City Council, June 6, 2023

PACKET
JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings

are

broadcast

live

Glendale

TV,

viewable

Spectrum

Cable,

channel

and

AT&T

U-
verse,

channel

99. Meetings

are

also

streamed

live

high

definition

(HD)

the

city's

webpage,
glendaleca.gov/live
,

YouTube.com/myglendale
,

and

Apple

TV,

Roku,

and

Amazon

Fire
devices

using

free

app

called

Screenweave

and

choosing

“Glendale

TV”

from

the

menu.

Meetings
are

also

archived

the

City

Website

for

viewing

anytime

glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

Call

(818)
548-4013

for

program

schedules.

For

public

comments

and

questions

during

the

meeting,

call

(818)
937-8100.

Public

comments

specific

agenda

item

will

taken

when

that

agenda

item

is
discussed.

you

have

any

question

about

matters

the

agenda,

requests

for

assistance,
please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

least

48 hours

(or

two

business

days)

notice

required

for
requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and

Braille

transcription

services.

All

documents
related

open

session

items

this

agenda

that

are

received

less

than

72 hours

prior

this
meeting,

and

are

public

records,

will

available

for

review

the

Office

the

City

Clerk,

613

Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation

services

are

provided

for

meetings

through

the

use

bilingual

staff

for

speakers

who
wish

utilize

the

service

available.

Speakers

should

state

their

request

contacting

the

City
Clerk’s

office

(818)

548-2090,

least

24 hours

prior

the

scheduled

meeting.

Please

specify
the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

City

provided

interpreters

not
required and persons are welcome to use their own interpreter or speak in their native language.

JUNE 6, 2023

ROLL CALL
-
3:00 PM
-
Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re: Posting of Agenda.

The Agenda for the Tuesday, June 6, 2023 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on Wednesday, May 31, 2023, on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall.

1 TYPED 5/31/2023 5:05:49 PM
06 06 23
CC HA

JOINT PUBLIC MEETING
of the City Council and Housing Authority is hereby called to meet at

3:00 PM
on
Tuesday, June 6, 2023
, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd
Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Development, re: Harrower Village – First Implementation Agreement to the Affordable Housing Agreement, Providing Additional Funding a. Housing Authority Resolution of Appropriation in the Amount of $1,215,372 for Additional Funding of Harrower Village at 920 E. Broadway
b. Housing Authority Motion to Authorize the Executive Director to Execute an Implementation Agreement and Related Documents

2. Community Services and Parks, re: FY 2023-2024 Proposed Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Programs
a. Council Resolution adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration b. Council Motion to approve a FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and staff; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, canceled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval
c. Housing Authority Motion to approve a FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; and authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and staff

3. Community Development, re: Appropriation of $3,697,671 in Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Funding for a Portion of the Acquisition Costs for 426 Piedmont Avenue, and for Administrative Costs
a. Council Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $3,697,671 for a Portion of the Acquisition Costs for 426 Piedmont Avenue, and for Administrative Costs

ADJOURNMENT

2 TYPED 5/31/2023 5:05:49 PM
06 06 23
CC HA

1 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Harrower Village – First Implementation Agreement to the Affordable Housing Agreement, Providing Additional Funding.

1. Housing Authority Resolution of Appropriation in the Amount of $1,215,372 for Additional Funding of Harrower Village at 920 E. Broadway; and

2. Housing Authority Motion to Authorize the Executive Director to Execute an Implementation Agreement and Related Documents.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 6, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Abode Communities, developer of Harrower Village, the 40-unit affordable housing project in construction at 920 East Broadway, has requested an additional $1.5M.

Significant cost increases prior to construction commencement required a number of changes to the project’s budget. The requested $1.5M would allow for the original design and finishes to be restored, increase the contingency budget to the original amount, restore a portion of the developer fee, add the rooftop photovoltaic system back into the design and cover the increased costs of insurance.

Staff is recommending approval of $1,215,372 in additional funding instead of $1.5M. This recommended amount would address all the items above except the developer fee.

Abode has made an application to the San Francisco Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) for Affordable Housing Program (AHP) funds which can address the portion of the developer fee that Abode has deferred by eliminating the permanent loan, which will also serve to pay the Housing Authority loans quicker and may reduce the term of the ground lease.
3 of 155

21 4
1 4
0 COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Housing - By providing an additional $1,215,372 to Harrower Village, the Housing Authority is providing the needed financial support to construct the 40-unit, 100% affordable rental housing project for seniors.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $1,215,372 and authorize the Executive Director to execute an Implementation Agreement and related documents with Abode Communities.

BACKGROUND
In the Fall of 2019, the Housing Authority purchased Tobinworld, which included two properties. One .8 acre site at 900 East Broadway and the other, just across a north-south alley, is another .8 acre site at 912-920 East Broadway and 117 S Belmont Street (collectively known as 920 East Broadway). 900 East Broadway is currently being developed by the Housing Authority in partnership with Meta Housing and is a 127-unit, 100% affordable housing project for seniors known as Citrus Crossing. 920 East Broadway is a historic campus of three buildings surrounding a large courtyard.

The last occupant of 920 East Broadway was Tobinworld. It was originally built in 1920 and was known as the Harrower Labs, at the time, the largest employer in the City.

Harrower Village is a 40-unit, 100% affordable housing project for seniors. It includes the adaptive re-use of the three existing historic structures as well as the addition of a new construction, 12-unit building in the rear of the property.

The Affordable Housing Agreement between the Housing Authority and Abode Communities was approved on May 24, 2022, providing $10.7M in Housing Authority assistance to the project. Subsequent to this approval, Abode Communities and CDD staff learned that there would be a shortfall in funds due to soaring construction material costs and rising interest rates. Given the need to close financing by June 26 2022, there was insufficient time to request additional funding then.

To address the shortfall in funding and close by June 26 th, Abode Communities value engineered the project and reduced contingency budgets. They also worked with their equity partner to increase the level of investment in the project and with the general contractor on construction contract concessions. Finally, Abode Communities deferred a significant portion of their developer fee to eliminate the funding gap, close financing, and begin construction.

ANALYSIS
Abode’s request for an additional $1.5M in funding would restore many of the original design elements of the project, restore the contingency budget of the adaptive re-use portion of the project from 10% back to 15%, address a portion of the developer fee that was deferred, and address the additional cost of insurance.

With respect to the original design elements of the project, the project was value 4 of 155

31 4
1 4
0 engineered to remove certain components from the building including a shade trellis and included the use of lesser quality countertops, light fixtures, and flooring, a change in hardscape and landscaping, and the removal of the rooftop photovoltaic system. The materials initially expected to be used for finishes included solid surface countertops, luxury vinyl plank flooring, and a variety of light fixture types providing both ambient and task lighting for seniors. Unless additional funding is provided, these design elements would be downgraded to plastic laminate countertops, sheet linoleum flooring, more basic surface mounted fluorescent light fixtures, and a decrease in the quantity and sizing of landscaping materials. Restoring these elements would cost $514,694.

Raising the contingency level of the adaptive re-use portion of the project from 10% to the original level of 15% of hard costs, adds another $475,915. This is an essential cost that is prudent to address given that the project is in construction and is an adaptive re- use of a historic commercial building into affordable housing and numerous unknown costs have arisen, which is typical of an adaptive re-use project.

Insurance premiums for the project skyrocketed from approximately $101k at the initial estimate in 2019 to $193,500 two months prior to finance closing deadline of June 26 th, 2022, to a final number of $553,549 at closing. The primary driver of these cost increases was specific to the project, as it is a 100-year-old campus of three historic, unreinforced masonry buildings. Abode Communities request of the Housing Authority for this line item is $224,763 with the balance being paid by developer contribution.

The additional funding of $1,215,372 would be memorialized in a First Implementation Agreement to the Affordable Housing Agreement (Exhibit 1) and related documents including a Loan Modification Agreement, First Implementation to Disbursement Agreement, project budget and Notes.

The remainder of funds Abode Communities is requesting is $323,730 in developer fees either contributed or deferred through lease-up and operation of the project. Staff is not recommending the Housing Authority fund this line item. Rather, Abode Communities has made an application for AHP funds. With a successful award of AHP funds, which staff believes is likely, the new funds will eliminate the need for a permanent loan on the project. This is a benefit to Abode Communities as well as the Housing Authority as it improves the cash flow of the project. This in turn allows for Abode Communities to receive its deferred developer fee faster and a quicker repayment of the Housing Authority’s residual receipts loans. It will also likely reduce the term of the ground lease by as much as ten years.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Public hearings were conducted on December 1, 2020 to approve the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement, May 4, 2021 approving the Density Bonus Housing Application, Letter of Loan Commitment and Lease Option and on May 24, 2022 approving the Affordable Housing Agreement. A Historic Preservation Committee hearing was also conducted on May 20, 2022. All hearings were properly noticed. 5 of 155

41 4
1 4
0 FISCAL IMPACT
Restoring the original design and finishes, increasing the contingency budget to the original amount, adding the rooftop photovoltaic system back into the design, and covering the increased costs of insurance will cost $1,215,372, which was not included as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $1,215,372, by shifting of appropriation from the Tobinworld Affordable Housing Development Project ($365,000) and from the Measure S Housing Land Acquisition Project ($850,372). The appropriation request is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$43,000 GL: 43112-4011-CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00683BN
Measure S CIP Fund
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$850,372 GL: 43110-4011-
CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00487AN
GL: 43112-4011-
CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00683BN
Measure S CIP
Fund
$365,000 GL: 43110-4011-
CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00148AN
GL: 43112-4011-
CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00683BN
Measure S CIP
Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The 920 East Broadway Project previously underwent review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City Council determined it to be exempt from any further CEQA review pursuant to section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), as a Class 32 “In-Fill Development Project”, as the project meets all the threshold criteria set forth in section 15332(a) through (e).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit #2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744. 6 of 155

51 4
1 4
0 ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Adopt the Resolution of Appropriation and adopt the Motion to authorize the Executive Director to execute the First Implementation Agreement to the Affordable Housing Agreement and related documents (exhibits/attachments and related agreements necessary to effectuate the additional funding).

Alternative 2: Not adopt the above-referenced Resolution or Motion and not provide additional funding. This would cause Harrower Village to proceed through construction with the value engineered finishes and without the rooftop photovoltaic system. It would also not address the contingency budget or increased insurance costs.

Alternative 3: Adopt the Resolution of Appropriation and provide funding sufficient to cover some of the line items such as restoring finishes and the rooftop photovoltaic system.

Alternative 4: The Housing Authority could consider any other alternative not presented by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Michael Fortney, Principal Housing Project Manager
Peter Zovak, Assistant Director of Community Development Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. First Implementation Agreement (with attachments/exhibits and other related agreements necessary to effectuate the funding increase);

2. Campaign Finance Disclosure Form.
7 of 155

8 of 155

9 of 155

MOTION
Moved by Authority Member ____________________________, seconded by Authority Member ___________________________, that the Executive Director, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute a First Implementation Agreement to Affordable Housing Agreement (“Agreement”) and all related documents, including all exhibits and/or attachments to the Agreement that are necessary to effectuate the intent of the Agreement, to grant additional funding of $1,215,372 to the Harrower Village project, as outlined in the June 6, 2023 Report to the Joint Meeting of the Glendale City Council and Housing Authority from the Assistant Director of Community Development.

Said agreement shall be subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
10 of 155

0 5.23.23
912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement

Page 1 ends

FIRST IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT

TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT
(912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street)
(Harrower Village)
T

HIS FIRST IMPLEMENTATION AGRE EMENT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT (this “First Implementation Agreement”) dated as of _____________________, 2023, is entered into by and between the HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, a public body, corporate and politic (“Authority”), and HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Developer”) . The Authority and Developer are individually referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” Recitals
A. The Parties entered into an Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of May 24, 2022 (the “AHA”) pursuant to which Developer obtained certain loans from the Authority for the purpose of developing affordable rental housing on certain real property described therein (the “Property”). All initially-capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them set forth in the AHA.

B. The Developer has requested an increase of $1,215,372 to the principal amount of the Measure S Loan to cover a portion of increased Acquisition and Development Costs and the Authority desires to provide such increase.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. The Method of Financing attached to the AHA as Attachment No. 3 is amended as follows:
a. The Method of Financing is amended in all respects to substitute $11,915,372 for $10,700,000 as the amount of the Authority Loans. b. The Method of Financing is amended in all respects to substitute $9,572,372 for $8,357,000 as the amount of the Measure S Loan.
c. The Method of Financing is amended in all respects to substitute $31,437,670 for $30,222,298 as the estimated total Acquisition and Development Costs.
d. The Method of Financing is amended in all respects to substitute $24,237,670 for $23,022,298 as the estimated total Acquisition and Exhibit 1
11 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement

Page 2 ends

Development Costs allocated to development, construction, and rehabilitation costs.
e. The Method of Financing is amend ed in all respects to provide that the Measure S Loan in the total amount of $9,572,372 consists of the Authority’s carry back of the fully capitalized rent under the Ground Lease in the amount of $7,200,000 and a loan of construction to permanent funds in the amount of $2,372,372, less a $237,237 hold-back, equal to ten percent (10%) of disbursements during construction.
f. The Method of Financing is amended in all respects to substitute $9,572,372 for $8,357,000 as the estimated amount of the permanent Measure S Loan.

2. The Ground Lease executed by the Parties (Landlord and Tenant therein) dated June 21, 2022, t he Assignment of Agreements executed by Developer (Borrower therein) dated June 21, 2022, and the Environmental Indemnity executed by the Parties (Authority and Borrower therein) dated June 21, 2022 are each hereby amended in all respects to give effect to this First Implementation Agreement and update any and all references to “Affordable Housing Agreement” or “AHA” to mean and refer to the AHA as amended by this First Implementation Agreement.

3. The LMIHAF Note executed by Developer (Borrower therein) dated June 21, 2022, Measure S N ote executed by Developer (Borrower therein) dated June 21, 2022, HOME N ote executed by Developer (Borrower therein) dated June 21, 2022, Authority Deed of Trust executed by Developer (Trustor therein) dated June 21, 2022, and Assignment of Rents executed by Developer (Borrower therein) dated June 21, 2022 are each hereby amended as set forth in the Loan Modification Agreement attached to this First Implementation Agreement as Attachment No. 1 and incorporated herein by reference . Following approval of thi s First Implementation Agreement and execution of the Loan Modification Agreement by Developer, the Authority Executive Director or designee is authorized to execute and record the Loan Modification Agreement in the Official Records of Los Angeles County.

4. The Project Budget attached to the AHA as Attachment No. 6 is replaced and superseded in its entirety with the Revised Project Budget attached hereto as Exhibit No. 2 and incorporated herein by reference.

5. The Disbursement Agreement executed by the Parties (Authority and Borrower therein) and Wells Fargo, National Association dated as of June 23, 2022 is hereby amended as set forth in the First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement attached to this First Implementation Agreement as Exhibit No. 3 and incorporated herein by reference. Following approval of this First Implementation Agreement, the Authority Executive Director or designee is authorized to execute the First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement.
12 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement

Page 3 ends

6. Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and prov isions of the AHA shall remain in full force and effect.

7. The Parties agree to execute such other instruments, agreements, and amendments to documents as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the AHA as revised by this First Implementation Agreement.

8. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one Agreement binding on the Authority and the Developer.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signatures on Following Page]

13 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement
S-1

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Authority and Developer have signed this First Implementation Agreement as of the dates set opposite their signatures.

“AUTHORITY”

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF GLENDALE

Dated: _______________, 2023 By:_____________________________ Roubik R. Golanian, P.E.

Executive Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:

MICHAEL J. GARCIA, CITY ATTORNEY
General Counsel to the Authority

By:______________________________
Michael J. Garcia

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN
Special Counsel to the Authority

By: ___________________________
Susan Apy

[SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE]

14 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement
S-2

“DEVELOPER”

HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P.,
a California limited partnership

by: Harrower Village GP, LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its general partner

by: Abode Communities,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its sole and managing member

Dated: __________, 2023 By:___________________________ Lara Regus
Senior Vice President

15 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement
Exhibit 1

EXHIBIT NO. 1

LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

[Behind This Page]
16 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street Loan Modification Agreement

Page 1 of 4 ends

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF

THE CITY OF GLENDALE
141 North Glendale Avenue, Suite 202
Glendale, California 91206
Attn: Director of Housing
and Community Development

APN: 5674-010-901 OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Document entitled to free
recording per Government
Code Section 27383

LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT
(912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street)
(Harrower Village)

This Loan Modification Agreement (this “Modification ”), dated as of _____________________, 2023, is entered into by HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Borrower”), whose address is 1149 S. Hill Street, Suite 700, Los Angeles, California 90015), and the HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, a public body, corporate and politic (“Lender”), whose address is 141 North Glendale Avenue, Suite 202, Glendale, California 91206, with reference to the following:

A. Borrower and Lender entered into an Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of May 24, 2022 (as amended, modified, supplemented, restated or replaced from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) with respect to the leasehold interest in certain real property described in Exhibit A attached to this Modification and incorporated herein by reference (the “Property”).

Any capitalized term that is not otherwise defined in this Modification has the meaning ascribed to such term in the Loan Agreement.

B. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement , Lender made three loans to Borrower in the original principal amounts of Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand Dollars ($8,357,000) (“ Measure S Loan ”), Five Hundred Forty -Three Thousand Dollars ($543,000) (“LMIHAF Loan”), and One Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,800,000) (“HOME Loan”), and, together with the Measure S Loan and the LMIHAF Loan, collectively referred to herein as the “Authority Loans”, to provide part of the financing for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation, and operation of a 40-unit housing project on the Property. 17 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street Loan Modification Agreement

Page 2 of 4 ends

C. The Measure S Loan is evidenced by a promissory note from Borrower to Lender dated June 21, 2022 (the “Measure S Note”) and secured by a Subordinated Leasehold Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (With Assignment of Rents) recorded in the Official Records of Los Angeles County (“ Official Records ”) on June 22, 2022 as Instrument No. 20220654954 (the “Deed of Trust ”) and a n Assignment of Rents a nd Leases recorded in the Official Records on June 22, 2022 as Instrument No. 20220654955 (the “Assignment of Rents”).

D. The LMIHAF Loan is evidenced by a promissory note from Borrower to Lender dated June 21, 2022 (the “LMIHAF Note”) and secured by the Deed of Trust and the Assignment of Rents.

E. The HOME Loan is evidenced by a promissory note from Borrower to Lender dated June 21, 2022 (the “HOME Note”) and secured by the Deed of Trust and the Assignment of Rents.

F. Lender and Borrower have entered into a First Implementation Agreement to Affordable Housing Agreement dated as of _________________, 2023 (“First Implementation Agreement”) which, among other things, adds $1,215,372 (“Loan Increase”) to the principal amount of the Measure S Loan and which provides for the Measure S Note to be modified to add the Loan Increase to the face amount of the Measure S Note.

G. Lender and Borrower now wish to modify the terms of the Measure S Note, LMIHAF Note, HOME Note, Deed of Trust, and Assignment of Rents in the manner set forth in this Modification.

NOW, THEREFORE, Lender and Borrower hereby agree that the Measure S Note, LMIHAF Note, HOME Note, Deed of Trust, and Assignment of Rents are amended as follows:

1. The original principal amount of the Measure S Loan will be Nine Million Five Hundred Thirty Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-Two Dollars ($9,530,372).

2. The Measure S Note evidencing the Measure S Loan is hereby amended in all respects to substitute Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Three Hundred Seventy- Two Dollars ($9,572,372) in place of Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($8,357,000) as the original principal amount of the Measure S Loan evidenced thereby.

3. The LMIHAF Note is hereby amended in all respects to substitute Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Three Hundred Seventy-Two Dollars ($9,572,372) in place of Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand Dollars ($8,357,000) as the original principal amount of the Measure S Loan.

4. The HOME Note is hereby amended in all respects to substitute Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Three Hundred Seventy -Two Dollars ( $9,572,372) in place of 18 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street Loan Modification Agreement

Page 3 of 4 ends

Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($8,357,000) as the original principal amount of the Measure S Loan.

5. The Deed of Trust securing the Measure S Loan is hereby amended in all respects to substitute Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Three Hundred Seventy -Two Dollars ( $9,572,372) in place of Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand Dollars ($8,357,000) as the original principal amount of the Measure S Loan secured thereby.

6. The Assignment of Rents securing the Measure S Loan is hereby amended in all respects to substitute Nine Million Five Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Three Hundred Seventy- Two Dollars ($9,572,372) in place of Eight Million Three Hundred Fifty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($8,357,000) as the original principal amount of the Measure S Loan secured thereby.

7. The Measure S Note evidencing the Measure S Loan is hereby amended to replace paragraph 8.b. with the following:

“b. The Authority’s Share of Residual Receipts to be applied to this N ote, the LMIHAF Note, and the HOME Note will be 75%. The Authority’s Share of Residual Receipts will be applied to the HOME Note, the LMIHAF Note, and the Measure S Note as follows: 15.11% (i.e., $1,800,000/$11,915,372) will be applied to this Note, 4.56% (i.e., $543,000/$11,915,372) will be applied to the LMIHAF Note, and 80.34% (i.e., $9,572,372/$11,915,372) will be applied to the Measure S Note.”

8. The LMIHAF Note evidencing t he LMIHAF Loan is hereby amended to replace paragraph 8.b. with the following:

“b. The Authority’s Share of Residual Receipts to be applied to this Note, the Measure S Note, and the HOME Note will be 75% . The Authority’s Share of Residual Receipts will be applied to the HOME Note, the LMIHAF Note, and the Measure S Note as follows: 15.11% (i.e., $1,800,000/$11,915,372) will be applied to this Note, 4.56% (i.e., $543,000/$11,915,372) will be applied to the LMIHAF Note, and 80.34% (i.e., $9,572,372/$11,915,372) will be applied to the Measure S Note.”

9. The HOME Note evidencing the HOME Loan is hereby amended to replace paragraph 8.b. with the following:

“b. The Authority’s Share of Residual Receipts to be applied to this Note, the LMIHAF Note, and the Measure S Note will be 75%. The Authority’s Share of Residual Receipts will be applied to the HOME Note, the LMIHAF Note, and the Measure S Note as follows: 15.11% (i.e., $1,800,000/$11,915,372) will be applied to this Note, 4.56% (i.e., $543,000/$11,915,372) will be applied to the LMIHAF 19 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street Loan Modification Agreement

Page 4 of 4 ends

Note, and 80.34% (i.e., $9,572,372/$11,915,372) will be applied to the Measure S Note.”

10. The Measure S Note, the LMIHAF Note, the HOME Note, the Deed of Trust, and the Assignment of Rents are each hereby amended to update any and all references to “Affordable Housing Agreement” or “Loan Agreement,” as applicable, to mean and refer to the Loan Agreement as amended by the First Implementation Agreement and to update any and all references t o “Measure S Note”, “LMIHAF Note”, “HOME Note”, “Deed of Trust”, or “Assignment of Rents” (or the like) to mean and refer to the Measure S Note , the LMIHAF Note, the HOME Note, the Deed of Trust, and the Assignment of Rents, as applicable, as amended by this Modification.

11. The Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents will secure the Measure S Note , LMIHAF Note, and HOME Note, each as amended by this Modification.

12. The Deed of Trust will secure Borrower’s performance of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, the Agreement Containing Covenants, and the Home Regulatory Agreement.

13. Except as expressly provided otherwise in this Modification, the Measure S Note, the LMIHAF Note, the HOME Note, the Deed of Trust, and the Assignment of Rents remain in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with their terms.

14. Borrower represents and warrants that by its signature Borrower is bound to perform pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement (as modified by the First Implementation Agreement), and the Measure S Note, the LMIHAF Note, the HOME Note, the Deed of Trust, and the Assignment of Rents, each as amended by this Modification.

15. Borrower agrees to execute such other instruments, agreements, and amendments to documents as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate this Modification.

16. This Modification may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

17. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto or their successors in title, and duly recorded in the Official Records.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] [Signatures Appear on Next Pages] 20 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
Loan Modification Agreement
Page S-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority and Developer have executed this Agreement.

“AUTHORITY”

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF GLENDALE

By: ____________________________
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E.

Executive Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:

MICHAEL J. GARCIA, CITY ATTORNEY
General Counsel to the Authority

By: _____________________________
Michael J. Garcia

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN
Special Counsel to the Authority

By: ______________________________
Susan Apy

[Signatures Continue on Next Page]

21 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
Loan Modification Agreement
Page S-2
“DEVELOPER”

HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P.,
a California limited partnership

by: Harrower Village GP, LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its general partner

by: Abode Communities,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its sole and managing member

Dated: __________, 2023 By:___________________________ Lara Regus
Senior Vice President

22 of 155

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)

COUNTY OF )

On , before me, ,
a Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. 23 of 155

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)

COUNTY OF )

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
Loan Modification Agreement
Exhibit A – Legal Description
Exhibit “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

A leasehold interest created by that certain Ground Lease between the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale and HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P., a California limited partnership, dated as of June 21, 2022 in the real property described as follows:

LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5 OF THE MAX MUIR TRACT, IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 10 PAGE 102 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPT THE NORTH 20 FEET OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 CONDEMNED BY THE CITY GLENDALE FOR STREET PURPOSES.

APN: 5674-010-901

25 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement
Exhibit 2

EXHIBIT NO. 2

REVISED PROJECT BUDGET

[Behind This Page]
26 of 155

05.23.23 Harrower Village (912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street) Revised Attachment No. 6
Revised Project Budget

REVISED ATTACHMENT NO. 6

REVISED PROJECT BUDGET

Sources of Funds Construction Permanent
Construction Loan $15,895,000 $0
Permanent Loan $0 $559,000
Glendale – HOME $1,800,000 $1,800,000
Glendale – LMIHAF $543,000 $543,000
Glendale – Measure S $9,572,372 $9,572,372
Accrued Deferred Interest $115,756 $115,756
LIHTC Equity – Federal $2,124,812 $15,878,083
LIHTC Equity – Federal
Historic $2,262,917
Wells Fargo Foundation
Grant $60,000 $60,000
GP Capital $100 $100
Deferred Costs $680,188 $0
Deferred Developer Fee $646,442 $646,442
Total Sources $31,437,670 $31,437,670
Uses
Land/Acquisition Costs $7,215,000
Construction/Hard Costs $16,108,154
Architecture & Engineering $1,246,802
Permits & Fees $292,204
Financing Costs $1,438,576
Contingency Costs $656,522
Reserves $127,470
Other Soft Costs $2,152,942
Developer Fee $2,200,000

Total Uses $31,437,670

27 of 155

912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Implementation Agreement to
Affordable Housing Agreement
Exhibit 3

EXHIBIT NO. 3

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISBURSEMENT AGREEMENT

[Behind This Page]

28 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement

Page 1 ends

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
(912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street)

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISBURSEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into by and among the HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE ( “Authority”), HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P. , a California limited partnership (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (“Construction Lender”), as of June ____, 2023. The Authority, Borrower, and Construction Lender are individually referred to herein as a “ Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

R E C I T A L S

A. The P arties entered into a Disbursement Agreement dated as of June 23, 2022 (“Disbursement Agreement”) to provide for the disbursement of Project Funds for approved Costs relating to the Authority’s lease to Borrower of the real property located at 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street in the City of Glendale, and Borrower’s development on the Property of the Project.

B. All initially -capitalized terms not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Disbursement Agreement.

C. Borrower has requested an increase of $1,215,372 to the principal amount of the Measure S Loan and the Authority desires to provide such increase.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. The Disbursement Agreement is hereby amended in all respects to:
a. substitute $11,915,372 for $10,700,000 as the amount of the Authority Loans; and
b. substitute $9,572,372 for $8,357,000 as the amount of the Measure S Loan.

2. Paragraphs 6.(3)(i) and 6.(4) of the Disbursement Agreement , respectively, are hereby amended to read as follows:
a. “(i) $2,135,135 (consisting of the $2,372,372 balance of the Measure S Loan after the disbursement described in paragraph (1), less the hold-back of ten percent (10%) described in paragraph (4) below);”; and b. “(4) The Authority will hold back ten percent (10%) of disbursements of the $2,372,372 portion of the remaining Measure S Loan referenced in 29 of 155

05.23.23 912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement

Page 2 ends

paragraph (3)(i), which will be disbursed to Borrower to pay Approved Costs as set forth in Section 8 below.”

3. The Project Budget attached to the Disbursement Agreement as Exhibit “A” is replaced and superse ded in its entirety with the Revised Project Budget attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.

4. Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and provisions of the Disbursement Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signatures on Following Pages]

30 of 155

912-920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement
Page S-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority , Construction Lender, and Borrower have executed this Disbursement Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

“Authority”

THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF GLENDALE

By: ____________________________
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E.

Executive Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:

MICHAEL J. GARCIA, CITY ATTORNEY
General Counsel to the Authority

By: _____________________________
Michael J. Garcia

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

KANE, BALLMER & BERKMAN
Special Counsel to the Authority

By: ______________________________
Susan Apy

[Signatures Continue On Following Pages]
31 of 155

912-920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement
Page S-2

“Borrower”

HARROWER VILLAGE, L.P.,
a California limited partnership

by: Harrower Village GP, LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its general partner

by: Abode Communities,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its sole and managing member

By:___________________________
Lara Regus
Senior Vice President

[Signatures Continue On Following Page]

32 of 155

912-920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
First Amendment to Disbursement Agreement
Page S-3

“Construction Lender”

WELLS FARGO, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: ________________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ________________________________

33 of 155

912-920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street
Disbursement Agreement
Exhibit A – Revised Project Budget
Exhibit “A” to Disbursement Agreement

REVISED PROJECT BUDGET

[Immediately Follows This Page]
34 of 155

05.23.23 Harrower Village (912 and 920 East Broadway & 117 S. Belmont Street) Exhibit A to First Amendment to
Disbursement Agreement
Revised Project Budget

REVISED PROJECT BUDGET

Total Uses $31,437,670

35 of 155

426 Piedmont Avenue & 507 Naranja Drive RFQ Campaign Finance Ordinance Disclosure

CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE DISCLOSURE
Cit
y of Glendale
Disclosure - Campaign Finance Ordinance
In August 2011, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, Campaign Finance Ordinance, which became effective on September 9, 2011 and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768 in February 2011. The Ordinance prohibits campaign contributions from parties who contract/subcontract with the City of Glendale (City), Glendale Redevelopment Agency (GRA), or the Housing Authority (HA) of the City of Glendale and prohibits Council Members from voting on matters pertaining to contracts with persons who hav e provided campaign contributions.

The Ordinance requires disclosure in staff reports providing the following information for the contractor and it’s subcontractor(s) receiving a contract, or a series or combination of contracts, from the City with a total value of $50,000 or more and $25,000 or more, respectively, in a fiscal year (July 1-June 30), excluding competitively bid contracts awarded to the lowest responsible Consultant:
• Name of
the entity
• Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
• Chief Operating Officer
• Chief Financial Officer
• Chairperson
• Any member of the board of directors
• Any person or entity that owns more than 10% of the contracting party or any subcontractor • Name of any campaign committee controlled or sponsored by the contracting party Please c
omplete the following Information for contractors & subcontractors (including Consultants & Sub-consultants):

Contract
or(s) *
Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer/
President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
Kelly Boyer, Board Chair
Holly Benson
Rick Saperstein
1149 S. Hill Street, #700 Los Angeles CA 90015 1149 S. Hill Street, #700 Los Angeles CA 90015 *Abode Communities is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization governed by a board of directors. Kelly Boyer is Board Chair. 1600 Rosecrans Ave, #411 Manhattan Beach CA 90266
Exhibit 2
36 of 155

426 Piedmont Avenue & 507 Naranja Drive RFQ Campaign Finance Ordinance Disclosure * For purposes of the Ordinance, the Contractor is any “person” who is the party or prospective party to the contract with the City, GRA or HA or any member of that party’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Office, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in the party, and any campaign committee, that is sponsored or controlled by the party. Please disclose the name and addresses of these persons above.

Subcontractor(s) **
Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer/President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” means a person who has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. For purposes of the “subcontractor”, “Person” includes the subcontracting party as well as any member of that party’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Office, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in the party, and any campaign committee, that is sponsored or controlled by the party. Please disclose the names and addresses of these persons above.

Campaign Committee Controlled/Sponsored by
Title Business Address City State Zip
Certification
I hereby certify, on behalf of the above-named contractor, that the names of all “person” of the contractor and subcontractor under the contract are fully set forth above. I further acknowledge that the Consultant has a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if the Consultant selects additional or substitute architects, design professionals, contractor or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change. I hereby certify that I have been legally authorized by the contractor to submit this disclosure form and certify to the content hereof.

Executed on at , California
Contractor’s Signature , Print Consultants’ Full Name
Contractor’s Address
Contractor’s Contact Phone Number Contractors’ E-mail Address May 24, 2023 Los Angeles
Abode Communities
1149 S. Hill Street, Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90015
(213) 629-2702 [email protected]
37 of 155

426 Piedmont Avenue & 507 Naranja Drive RFQ

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I ac
knowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and
• I hereby
certify that:
 I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure;  The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, c orrect, and complete; and
 I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at:
, Cal ifornia.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
x
May 24 23 Los Angeles
Holly Benson, President & CEO
1149 S. Hill Street, Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90015
(213) 629-2702 [email protected]
38 of 155

2 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: FY 2023-2024 Proposed Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Programs

1. Council Resolution adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration.

2. City Council Motion to approve a FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and staff; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

3. Housing Authority Motion to approve a FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; and authorize submission of the Annual Action Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and staff.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for May 23, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CDBG Advisory Committee made funding recommendations for the CDBG program based on program priorities, a final entitlement allocation from HUD, and reprogrammed funds from previous program years. The CDBG Committee reviewed proposals from community agencies for Public Social Services (PSS) and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), conducted interviews with the agencies and recommended funding for ten community agencies for PSS, four community agencies for CIP, and one City CIP project, the Pacific Natural Grass Project in program year 2023-2024.

The CoC Board approved the FY 2023-24 funding recommendations in the proposed Annual Action Plan for the ESG Program based on program priorities, an entitlement 39 of 155

22 4
2 1
8 allocation of $152,207. The ESG funding plan that is developed is a two-year plan. ESG programs that request continued funding for the subsequent year and meet their outcomes and performance goals are allowed to be renewed for funding subject to review and approval by the CoC Board.

The Housing Authority uses HOME funding to develop affordable housing projects and programs. It periodically updates a Statement of Interest to reflect funding and priorities for the HOME allocation it receives each year from HUD. It also seeks input from community members through the Annual Action Plan process. Funding priorities for FY 23-24 include development of Affordable Rental Development-New Construction and/or Acquisition 920 E Broadway and Administrative Costs.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Housing – Identify and acquire property for next affordable housing project.

Infrastructure – Add new park amenities and improve accessibility, functionality, and reliability of existing park amenities.

RECOMMENDATION
City Council:
1) Approve a Resolution adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration. 2) Approve a Motion for FY 2023-24 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; authorize submission of the Annual Action plan to HUD, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless CoC Board, and authorize the City Manager to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

Housing Authority:
1) Approve a Motion for FY 2023-24 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; authorize submission of the Annual Action plan to HUD, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless CoC Board.

BACKGROUND
The City of Glendale has been receiving CDBG funds from HUD since the inception of the program in 1974, thereby, marking it the 49th anniversary of the Glendale CDBG program. The ESG program was added in 1987 and the HOME program was added in 1992.

The national and local objectives of the CDBG program are to:

1. eliminate conditions of slums and blight, and

2. provide programs and services that benefit low and moderate-income persons, including the homeless.
40 of 155

32 4
2 1
8 The objectives of the ESG program are to:

1. engage homeless individuals and families living on the street;

2. improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families;

3. help operate these shelters;

4. provide essential services to shelter residents;

5. rapidly re-house homeless individuals and families; and

6. prevent families and individuals from becoming homeless.

The objective of the HOME program is to provide and preserve affordable housing for low-income persons.

The City is responsible for following HUD guidelines and developing a 5-year Consolidated Plan and an Annual Action Plan for the use of the funds.

Consolidated Plan
As a condition of eligibility for CDBG, ESG, and HOME entitlement funds, the City is required to submit a five-year strategic plan “Consolidated Plan” for the use of these funds. The current Five Year 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) was approved by the City Council in June 2020 and submitted and approved by HUD. The ConPlan provides a profile of the City, and establishes program priorities, funding strategies and proposed goals for addressing community development, housing, and homeless needs in the community. The ConPlan also incorporates other funding sources, programs and initiatives that assist in addressing the City’s community development, housing, and homeless needs; and strategies for leveraging and coordinating these resources.

The ConPlan is the primary planning document that HUD uses to measure the City’s effectiveness and to approve the submission of Annual Action Plans and other funding applications to HUD. The Annual Action Plans are comprised of specific projects the City plans to implement to meet the objectives of the ConPlan every fiscal year.

Annual Action Plan
In developing the Annual Action Plan, HUD requires that the City involve citizens in the plan development and approval process. This process includes is a combined effort for CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs and includes community meetings, board meetings and oversight boards.

CDBG:

The most prominent program in the ConPlan/Action Plan development process, is the CDBG program. Annual planning for the CDBG program includes outreach to Glendale non-profit community agencies to introduce the CDBG program and process; hosting a meeting to identify community needs and set program priorities, pre-designating funds to City CIP; issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) to community agencies for PSS programs and CIP; working with the CDBG Advisory Committee to review the proposals, interview the agencies that submitted proposals and recommend funding community agencies; monitoring current fiscal year programs; and reallocating funds as necessary. 41 of 155

42 4
2 1
8 CDBG ADVISORY COMMITTEE:

To achieve citizen involvement in the plan development and approval process, the City Council appoints a citizen CDBG Advisory Committee, whose responsibility is to help oversee the planning process. The Committee’s current responsibilities include:
•Reviewing and commenting on the annual community needs assessment strategy. •Recommending program priorities, based on findings from the needs assessment, as well as input from the City Council;
•Evaluating funding proposals;
•Interviewing community agencies and City departments that submit project proposals;
•Recommending projects for funding;
•Reviewing sub-recipient performance, such as site visits and outcome reviews; •Reviewing and approving revisions or amendments to projects throughout the program year; and
•Reviewing and recommending reprogramming of CDBG funds.

The current CDBG Advisory Committee is comprised of the following members:

Committee Member Appointing Council Member

1. Anita Quiñonez-Gabrielian (Chair) Councilmember Paula Devine

2. Armik Avedisian (Vice Chair) Councilmember Ardy Kassakhian

3. Zanku Armenian Mayor Daniel Brotman

4. Ronnie Gharibian Councilmember Ara Najarian

5. Marina Manoukian Councilmember Elen Asatryan
CDBG funds are divided into three categories: Program Administration, Public Social Services, and Capital Improvement Projects.

Administration (Planning, Program Management and Oversight):

HUD allows jurisdictions to use 20% of their CDBG entitlement funds for administration of the program to ensure that they have the capacity to comply with the administratively laden HUD requirements and minimize financial risks. The core functions of Administration are planning, monitoring, contract compliance, financial management and project coordination. HUD is becoming stricter in requiring more low-income documentation from the sub-recipients in order to show eligibility for CDBG funds, which translates to greater financial risk and need for management and oversight.

Public Social Services:

HUD imposes a statutory limit of 15% on the amount of CDBG entitlement funds that can be used for social services regardless of how great the local need is for these services.

The basic HUD eligibility criteria for social service projects are: 1) the program constitutes a new or expanded level of service at the time that it is first funded, 2) the program serves over 60% low-income families (those who earn less than 80% of the County median), and 3) the CDBG funds are not used to substitute another available funding source. 42 of 155

52 4
2 1
8 In addition to HUD eligibility criteria, agencies will have to meet financial capacity prequalification guidelines, such as submission of two years of financial statement compilations and copies of Board minutes approving the financial statements, to be eligible to apply for City’s CDBG Program funds.

Capital Improvement and Neighborhood Improvement Projects:

Generally, capital and neighborhood improvement funds represent 65% of CDBG entitlement funds, plus any available reprogrammed funds, which can only be used for capital and neighborhood improvement projects. Projects that qualify for this funding category include: community centers, such as parks, libraries, recreation centers, senior centers, youth centers, employment centers and social service centers; handicapped accessibility projects anywhere in the City; public improvements in low income neighborhoods; commercial rehabilitation; and economic development projects.

Traditionally, as part of the funding allocation plan, the City Council pre-designates and pre-approves City CIP deemed a priority, and authorizes the issuance of a Request for Funding Proposal (RFP) to community agencies for the remainder of the CDBG funds.

Proposals are solicited from agencies for PSS and the balance of capital improvement funds for community CIP. Any qualified non-profit community agency or public agency is eligible to apply for CDBG funds provided that projects meet one of the two broad national objectives: 1) serving low-income persons, or 2) preventing or eliminating conditions of slums and blight. In addition, funded projects are required to serve primarily Glendale residents and not to discriminate in the provision of services. Furthermore, projects that meet the identified program priorities are given preference for funding.

The proposal evaluation criteria used by the CDBG Advisory Committee includes:
1) Overall quality of the proposal;
2) Whether the project meets a program priority;
3) Ability of the applicant to substantiate that the project meets a community need; 4) Whether the proposal clearly articulates a target population/outreach strategy; 5) Financial capacity of the organization,
6) Demonstration of coordination and collaboration with other agencies/programs; 7) Program goals and outcomes;
8) Feasibility of proposed implementation plan;
9) Budget, cost effectiveness and leveraging of funds; and 10) Demonstrated experience, effectiveness and administrative capacity of sponsoring Organization/City Department, including performance history.

Additional tools provided to the Committee to evaluate capacity and effectiveness of proposals include: 1) mid-year performance reports, 2) financial analysis report prepared by staff for each non-profit organization, and 3) proposal evaluation rating forms.

ESG PROGRAM:

The ESG Program follows the same process as CDBG, in terms of identification of homeless priorities, issuance of RFPs and proposal evaluation, except that ESG funding 43 of 155

62 4
2 1
8 proposals are reviewed and recommended by a separate homeless proposal review committee comprised of the Continuum of Care (CoC) Board. The CoC Board is guided by the specific needs of the CoC model of homeless services adopted by the Glendale CoC. The ESG funding plan is developed is a two-year plan. ESG programs that request continued funding for the subsequent year and meet their program outcomes and performance goals are allowed to be renewed for funding subject to review and approval by the CoC Board.

The published national objective of the ESG program is to help with the expansion, improvement and operation of emergency shelter facilities, supportive services, rapid re- housing, and homeless prevention.

The current CoC Board is comprised of the following members:

Board Member Agency
Melissa Younesian, Chair Verdugo Jobs Center
Vice Chair Vacant
Lt. Alex Krikorian Glendale Police Department
Baron Hopkins Homeless Alumni

HOME
The Housing Authority is a Participating Jurisdiction under the HOME Program. As such, it receives an allocation each year directly from HUD to carry out affordable housing programs and projects.

The Housing Authority periodically updates a Statement of Interest to reflect its funding priorities. Like the CDBG and ESG programs, it seeks input from the community through the Annual Action Plan process to determine what housing needs exist. It also solicits Requests for Proposal from developers when sufficient funding is available for development of an affordable housing project. A review team consisting of city staff reviews proposals and provides recommendations to the Housing Authority for viable affordable housing developments.

The Housing Authority uses HOME funding, as well as other funding sources including Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF), and Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program to create affordable housing programs and projects. The City Council can also assign local Measure S funds to housing related purposes.

ANALYSIS
The FY 2023-24 Annual Action Plan process for CDBG began on September 7, 2022, when staff held the fifth annual Open House event in a virtual platform inviting over 99 non-profit organizations to participate. Twelve representatives from eleven non-profit community agencies attended the Open House to learn about the CDBG program.

In the Fall of 2022, a meeting was held to gather input from residents to identify needs and determine program priorities for CDBG, ESG and HOME. Five platforms were used 44 of 155

72 4
2 1
8 to gather comments, which included: 1) in-person community meeting, 2) a virtual community meeting via Microsoft Teams 3) email, 4) Telephone call-in option, and 5) a Community Needs Survey.

In total, six people attended the in-person community meeting. Seven residents participated in the virtual community meeting. Seventeen email comments and five telephone comments were received. 279 surveys were completed and analyzed.

On November 15, 2022, as part of the annual program planning cycle, staff presented the CDBG Advisory Committee recommendations to City Council/Housing Authority for approval when they approved: a preliminary proposed FY 2023-24 CDBG Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category; program priorities; and issuance of an RFP for PSS programs and CIP based on estimated $1,700,000 CDBG entitlement funding from HUD.

The Proposed FY 2023-24 Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category originally approved by Council/Housing Authority was as follows, based on an estimated $1,700,000 in CDBG Program funds:
•$340,000 (20%) for Administration (planning, program management and oversight)
•$255,000 (15%) for public social services programs
•$1,140,299 (65%) for capital improvement projects
-$400,000 FY2023-2024 Fremont Park Renovation Project
-$740,299 undesignated and available to community agencies for community capital improvement projects under an RFP
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS:

When the RFP was issued on November 17, 2022, it was based on the estimated $1,700,000 in entitlement funds. Seventeen CDBG funding proposals were received and evaluated by staff (through a Strength and Weakness Analysis) and the CDBG Advisory Committee. The Committee, on March 3, 2023, and March 6, 2023, interviewed each agency requesting PSS and CIP funds, respectively. The Committee deliberated and developed funding recommendations based on the HUD CDBG formula allocation released on February 27, 2023 and previous program year reprogrammed funds for CIP.

The final FY 2023-24 HUD Entitlement Funds for all programs and CDBG unappropriated fund balance from previous years is summarized below and is part of the final proposed Annual Action Plan: (See Exhibit 2)

CDBG $1,764,982
ESG $ 152,207
HOME $1,576,169 + $130,000 (Program Income)
Total $3,623,358
45 of 155

82 4
2 1
8 Based on the final HUD allocations, the final proposed FY 2023-2024 Funding Allocation Plan for the CDBG Program is as follows:
•$264,747 (15% of entitlement funds) for PSS.
•$1,147,238 (65% of entitlement funds) for CIP
o$480,196 for community agency CIP.
o$667,042 for pre-designated City project (Pacific Natural Grass) •$352,996 (20% of entitlement funds) for planning, program management and oversight.

Public Social Services
Twelve proposals were received for PSS programs totaling $752,268 which was $487,521 over the available amount of $264,747. Ten programs were recommended for funding. Two agencies were not recommended for funding in FY 2023-2024: Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin and Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America.

Below is a summary table of Public Social Services final funding recommendations for FY 2023-2024:

PROGRAM CATEGORY/PROJECTS/SPONSOR

RECOMMENDED
FY 23-24

FUNDING
YOUTH AND TEEN PROGRAMS:

Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling, CASPS $33,000 Youth Employment Program, Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) $20,000 ADULT COUNSELING & CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS:

Pro Bono Legal Services, Armenian Bar Association $20,000 Community Outreach Program, Armenian Relief Society $60,000 Fair Housing Program, Housing Rights Center
(Additional funding from Section 8 Earned Administration Funds- $10,000 for a total allocation of $20,300)
$10,150
HOMELESS PROGRAMS:

Glendale Community Center Loaves and Fishes, Catholic
Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. $35,000
Homeless Outreach Program, Ascencia $25,000
Crisis Housing Support, Home Again, Los Angeles $15,000 Domestic Violence Services, Door of Hope $22,000
Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence, YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $24,597
TOTAL PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $264,747
46 of 155

92 4
2 1
8 The highest percentage of PSS funding is recommended for homeless services programs at 46% ($121,597). The next highest funding allocation by program type is adult counseling and case management programs at 34% ($90,150) and lastly, youth programs, which include: in-school programs, enrichment programs, afterschool programs, youth employment, and teen programs at 20% ($53,000).

In addition to the CDBG funding for PSS programs, the City uses other non-CDBG funds to leverage programs provided by community agencies. For example, the City has leveraged Section 8 Earned Administration funds and CDBG funds to fund the Housing Rights Center’s (HRC) Fair Housing Program for fair housing services and tenant landlord information. The current contract amount for the FY 2022-23 Fair Housing Program is $20,000 which includes $10,000 in CDBG funding and $10,000 in Section 8 Earned Administration funding. For FY 2023-24, a similar split is recommended for Council/Housing Authority approval: $10,150 in CDBG funding and $10,150 in Section 8 Earned Administration funding for a total of $20,300 to be allocated to the Housing Rights Center’s Fair Housing program for FY 2023-2024. Section 8 Earned Administration funding for the HRC contract is budgeted in the FY 2023-2024 Community Development Section 8 budget.

Capital Improvement Projects
Five community agencies submitted CIP proposals for consideration totaling $1,153,027.

In addition to the FY2023-2024 CIP allocation amount of $1,147,238, there was additional funding from returned, and/or canceled projects available in the amount of $1,092,322.83 from previous program years.

The Committee made a recommendation to fund one of the FY2023-2024 proposals with previous program year funds: YMCA of Glendale All-Inclusive Locker Room was fully funded with their requested $546,510.25 using prior year program funds, which was approved by the City Council/Housing Authority on April 4, 2023.

The remaining four project proposals were recommended for funding by the CDBG Advisory Committee along with City CIP Pacific Natural Grass project.

Below is a summary table of the Capital Improvement Project final funding recommendations for FY 2023-2024:

RECOMMENDED PROJECT/SPONSOR

RECOMMENDED
FY 23-24 FUNDING

COMMUNITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CDBG Re-piping Project, Ascencia (additional funding) $20,000 Community Services Center, Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts $92,696 47 of 155

102
4 2
1 8
CDBG Cancelled/Unused Funds
Furthermore, staff is requesting for Council to authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval. This authorization will allow staff to work with the CDBG Advisory Committee to reallocate funds, should there be a need, without having to come back to Council for such a small amount.

Exhibit 3 provides a Summary List of FY 2023-24 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations. A ten-year table of CDBG funding history for combined Public Social Services and Capital Improvement Projects is attached as Exhibit 8.

ESG PROGRAM:

On March 9, 2023, the CoC Board recommended funding four existing ESG community projects for FY 2023-24. Programs that were approved for funding in FY2023-24 by the CoC Board and meet their outcomes and performance goals may be recommended for renewal for FY2024-25.

The previously approved funding recommendations have been updated based on the FY 2023-24 funding allocation, which is $9,356 less than the previous year (Please refer to Exhibit 7.) Traditionally, no more than 40% of the total allocation can be used for Shelter Operations. However, during FY 2021-22, HUD waived this requirement due to the pandemic. In FY2022-23, the City is now back to the traditional methodology used for each ESG component per HUD’s recommendation.

The FY 2023-24 ESG funding recommendations are as follows:

Ascencia- Emergency Housing Program $33,703
YWCA of Glendale-Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency
Shelter Program (Rapid Re-Housing) $26,500
Repairing & Repaving of the Parking Lot, Driveway, Front Parking Lot, Homenetmen Ararat Chapter $247,500
Public Safety Improvement to NLSLA Parking Lot, Neighborhood Legal Services of LA COUNTY $120,000
FY22-23 First Floor All Inclusive Locker Room Project, YMCA of Glendale (funded with previous program year funding) $0

PRE-DESIGNATED CITY PROJECTS
Pacific Natural Grass Project, Community Services & Parks $667,042 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: $1,147,238
48 of 155

112
4 2
1 8
Catholic Charities- Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program $37,236 HOME Again LA (New) $51,365
Rapid Re-Housing Program
City HMIS $0
Accounting for use of Grant Administration $3,403
GRAND TOTAL $152,207
It’s important to note that State funding of $50,000 was utilized to provide additional funding to the following agencies based on the CoC Board’s recommendation:

YWCA of Glendale-Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency $38,750 Shelter Program (Rapid Re-housing)
Ascencia $11,250
Ascencia- Emergency Housing Program
HOME PROGRAM:

HOME projects are not solicited in the same manner as the CDBG and ESG programs.

Specific HOME projects are developed by the Housing Authority on an ongoing basis (through a continuous Statement of Interest that is updated periodically to reflect funding and priorities and through a RFP process when sufficient funds are available for a feasible development project). Also, as part of the process of developing the Annual Plan, HUD requires input from the community regarding housing needs and housing programs for the Housing Authority to consider when approving housing programs and projects. The HOME planning and budgeting process is currently underway and the FY 2023-2024 Affordable Housing Budget will be brought to the Housing Authority for review in June 2023. In addition to HOME funds, the Affordable Housing Budget also includes Section 8 Rental Assistance, federal CoC homeless funds, BEGIN Homeownership Program, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund expenditures, Measure S funding for the Monthly Housing Subsidy Program, and program income from Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

The funding plan for the use of HOME funds will be determined by the Housing Authority as part of the Housing Authority’s review and approval of the annual Affordable Housing Budget, with consideration given to input received regarding housing needs as part of the CDBG, ESG and HOME Annual Plan community needs assessment process.

The HOME program is one of four major housing resources addressed in the City’s 2020- 2025 Consolidated Plan. The table below shows the four major funding sources and two additional funding sources, estimated FY2023-2024 revenues from each, and percentage of total revenues for each.
49 of 155

122
4 2
1 8
Estimated Affordable Housing Revenue FY2023-2024
Funding Source Estimated
Revenue
Percent of
Total Revenue
HOME Investment Program $1,706,169 2.77%
Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds $200,000 0.32%
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program $53,900,000 87.46% Affordable Housing Trust Fund $42,440 0.07%
BEGIN Homeownership Program $10,000 0.02%
Monthly Housing Subsidy Program $3,026,677 4.91%
CoC Homeless Competitive Funding $2,741,171 4.45%
TOTAL FUNDS $61,626,457 100%
Generally, the budget allocates most of HOME funds for use in projects and programs that increase affordable housing opportunities and supply. Based on the current housing market, the greatest opportunity for increasing the affordable housing supply in the next year is through the Affordable Rental – New Construction and Acquisition/Rehabilitation Program. HOME funds are restrictive in that they can only be used for lower income households. Other HOME fund requirements typically include: a 25% match by developers; a reserve of 15% for a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO); federal prevailing wages for larger housing projects; a commitment of funds to a specific project within 24 months (temporarily suspended); and a requirement for expenditure of funds within five years.

The entitlement amount for HOME funds in FY 2023-24 is $1,576,169, a slight increase from the FY 2022-23 grant amount. In addition, $130,000 is also available from HOME program income for FY 2023-24 HOME projects. HOME funds from FY2023-24 and prior years represent most of the funds that will be available in FY2023-24 for new construction of affordable housing units. Therefore, it is recommended that the funding strategies for the HOME program in FY 2023-24 include:
•Affordable Rental Development-New Construction and/or Acquisition $1,299,127
•15% CHDO Reserve
$236,425
50 of 155

132
4 2
1 8
It is also recommended to appropriate $170,617 for administration to pay for costs associated with planning, reporting, project development, and compliance monitoring of HOME projects. This amount is equal to 10% of the 2023 HOME entitlement amount, plus 10% of program income.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
PUBLIC COMMENT:

HUD requires the City to publish a notice regarding CDBG, ESG and HOME funding recommendations in the newspaper, and conduct a public hearing to receive public comments. The CDBG Advisory Committee directed staff to look into additional ways to get resident comments. This year, outreach efforts included an in-person meeting at Pacific Community Center on Wednesday, April 12, 2023, a virtual Public Hearing scheduled on Thursday, April 13, 2023, as well as an option to send public comments by way of mail, email, or telephone call between March 17, 2023, to April 16, 2023.

On March 17, 2023, staff posted a public notice on the City’s webpage, social media, and in the CSP Newsletter informing residents of a public comment period of March 17, 2023 to April 16, 2023. Furthermore, on March 17, 2023 the same notice was published in the Glendale Independent. Reminder e-mails were sent out to CSP contact lists, community non-profits, HOAs, and posted on social media with reminders two to three days before the virtual meeting.

Six residents attended the in-person Public Hearing and seven attended the virtual meeting. One email comment was received and recorded, and no telephone calls were received. All comments via in-person meeting, Microsoft Teams, and email were received and recorded in Exhibit 4.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, HOME Annual Action Plan is based on a $3,623,358 budget, which was included as a part of the FY 2023-2024 proposed budget as follows:

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Community Development Department, after conducting an Initial Study, prepared a Negative Declaration for the FY 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan that was circulated for a 20-day public review period from April 20, 2023, to May 10, 2023. No comments were received. (See Exhibit 5)
Staff is requesting the City Council adopt the negative declaration for the FY 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan.

Amount Funding Source
$1,764,982 CDBG Fund
$ 152,207 Emergency Solutions Grant Fund
$1,706,169 Home Grant Fund ($1,576,169) and
Program Income ($130,000)
51 of 155

142
4 2
1 8
If the Council and the Authority approve the Annual Action Plan and if the Council adopts the Resolution for the Environmental Negative Declaration, staff will place a 30-day notice in the newspaper informing the public that the approved Plans are available for study and comment. The Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD and implementation of the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs will commence on July 1, 2023.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 6, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES
City Council:

Alternative 1: Approve 1) a Resolution Adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration; and 2) a Motion approving and authorizing submission of the FY 2023-24 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and authorize the City Manager to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee Approval.

Alternative 2: Do not approve the FY 23-24 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

Housing Authority:

Alternative 1: Approve a Motion authorizing submission of the FY 23-24 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,623,358; and authorizing submission of the Annual Action Plan to HUD as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board.

Alternative 2: Do not approve the FY 2023-24 CDBG, ESG and HOME Annual Action Plan.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. 52 of 155

152
4 2
1 8

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Arsine Isayan, Homeless Programs Manager
Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Pamela Jackson, Housing Coordinator
Tereza Aleksanian, Deputy Director of Community Services & Parks Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. FY 2023-2024 Proposed CDBG Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category

2. Proposed FY 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan for CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs

3. Summary List of FY 2023-2024 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations

4. Summary of Public Hearing and Public Comments

5. Proposed Negative Declaration

6. Campaign Finance Disclosures

7. FY 2023-24 ESG Funding Allocation

8. CDBG Ten-Year Table of Funding History
53 of 155

1 RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION

UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
FOR THE FY 2023-24 CDBG, ESG, AND HOME

ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2023, the Director of Community Development— after having considered the Initial Study prepared on behalf of Community Services and Parks Department for the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Programs in the City of Glendale, California (“Project”)— directed that a Proposed Negative Declaration be prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the proposed Negative Declaration— which is attached as Exhibit 5 to the May 23, 2023 Report to the City Council and the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale and is incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth— was published, was duly noticed as required by law, and was made available for a 20-day public review and comment period; and
WHEREAS, a final Negative Declaration has been prepared incorporating any comments received during the review period and any responses to those comments; and WHEREAS, the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City of Glendale; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the findings of the Director of Community Development with respect to the preparation of the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Glendale Community Development Department has been identified as the custodian of record for the Negative Declaration.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1.The recitals set forth above are true and correct.

SECTION 2.The Negative Declaration for the Project was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State and Local Guidelines.

SECTION 3.The Negative Declaration has been presented to the City Council.

The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study, the Negative Declaration, and public comments, and finds on the whole record before it that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, the City Council hereby certifies and adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the Project.
54 of 155

2 Adopted this __________ day of _______________, 2023.

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a joint meeting of the Council and Housing Authority of the City of Glendale held on the __________ day of _______________, 2023. and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
55 of 155

1 MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the City Council:

1. Has reviewed and approves the FY 2023-24 Annual Action Plan (“Plan”) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) Programs totaling $3,623,358, as more particularly outlined in the May 23, 2023 Joint Report, including its attachments and exhibits, to the City Council and Housing Authority of the City of Glendale;

2. Authorizes staff to submit the Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and staff; and

3. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
56 of 155

1 MOTION
Moved by Housing Authority Member ____________________________, seconded by Housing Authority Member ___________________________, that the Housing Authority:

3. Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
57 of 155

EXHIBIT 1
FY 2023-2024 PROPOSED CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATION PLAN BY FUNDING CATEGORY

FY 21-22
Final HUD
Allocation
FY 22-23

FINAL HUD
Allocation
FY 23-24
Proposed HUD
Allocation
$1,921,981 $1,731,797 $1,764,982
HUD ENTITLEMENT: $1,921,981 $0 $0
CURRENT YEAR CDBG PROGRAM INCOME $0 $0 $0
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE $66,607 $0
REPROGRAMMED FUNDS*
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES:

ADMINISTRATION (20% of Entitlement): $378,818 $346,359 $352,996 (planning, program management and oversight)
PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES (15% of Entitlement): $288,297 $259,770 $264,747 Reprogrammed Funds:

COMMUNITY PROJECTS: (100%)
•Pro Bono Legal Clinic-Armenian Bar Association $0 $15,977 $20,000 •Intergenerational Experiences-ACA Hamazkayin $15,299 $0 $0 •AESA STEM Academy-Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America $10,299 $0 $0 •Community Outreach Project-Armenian Relief Society $50,299 $50,977 $60,000 •Homeless Outreach Case Management-Ascencia $18,598 $20,977 $25,000 •Loaves and Fishes Homeless Prevention Program-Catholic Charities $41,409 $25,977 $35,000 •Intervention/Prevention Group Counseling Program-CASPS $30,299 $30,977 $33,000 •Domestic Violence Services-Door of Hope $20,299 $25,977 $22,000 •Crisis Housing Support-Home Again LA $10,299 $10,977 $15,000 •Youth Employment Program-Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) $25,299 $20,977 $20,000 •Fair Housing Program-Housing Rights Center $10,299 $10,000 $10,150 •Mental Health Services for Survivors of DV-YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $25,977 $24,597 •People's Choice Food Pantry-Salvation Army $20,977 •Youth Development Through Scouting-Boy Scouts of America Verdugo Hills Council $10,299 •Afterschool Program-Armenian Cultural Foundation $35,299 •Food for Thought Food Pantry-Glendale College Foundation $10,299 Public Social Services Sub-total $288,296 $259,770 $264,747 CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: $1,254,866 $1,192,275 $1,147,239 PRE-DESIGNATED PROJECTS: $400,000 $225,667 $667,043
•FY23-24 Pacific Natural Grass Project $667,043
•FY22-23 Fremont Park Renovation Project $225,667 •FY21-22 Pacific Park Splash Pad Project $400,000 UN-DESIGNATED COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $854,867 $966,607 $480,196 •FY22/23 First Floor All-Inclusive Locker Room Project-YMCA of Glendale $334,491 $179,000 $0 •CDBG Repiping Project-Ascencia $31,840 $20,000 •Community Services Center-Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts $92,696 •Public Safety Improvement to NLSLA Parking Lot- Neighborhood Legal Services $120,000 •Repairing/Repaving Parking Lot, Driverway, Front Parking Lot MC-Homenetmen Ararat $247,500 •Hamilton House Renovation Project-The Campbell Center $377,884 •YWCA Lexington Campus CIP-YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $377,884 •Glendale Youth Center CIP Project-Armenian Cultural Center $116,000 •Restroom Renovation Project at Main Campus-Homenetmen Ararat Chapter $206,518 •Alma House CIP-The Campbell Center $197,858 FY PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: $1,921,981 $1,798,404 $1,764,982 Balance $0 $0 $0
Uncommitted FY 2016-2019 Grant funds $66,607
58 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
1 PROPOSED FY 2023-2024

ACTION PLAN FOR

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT,

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT AND HOME PROGRAMS
I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

PROJECT/AGENCY FUNDING

PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES

RECOMMENDED
COMMUNITY PROGRAMS:

Pro Bono Legal Services $20,000
Armenian Bar Association
Armenian Bar Association (ABA) is requesting $48,840 to provide pro bono legal services to low and moderate income individuals living in Glendale. One-to-one counseling services are provided at the Adult Recreation Center at 201 E Colorado, Glendale, CA 91205 with a goal of bridging the language and finance gap that limits the client’s ability to access justice. ABA Services include: housing rights, employment matters, domestic violence, expungement services, criminal law matters, estate planning, and additional services. ABA does not have formal offices and uses a P.O.

Box 29111, Los Angeles, CA 90029 for correspondence.

Intergenerational Experiences $0
Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin
Armenian Cultural Association, Hamazkayin is requesting $54,400 to provide afterschool arts, music, theater, and dance classes for students of all ages, special needs and low-income Glendale families. 40 classes are proposed to be conducted for the program year in singing/choir, theater/workshops, dance painting/drawing, design, artifacts, and technology pods to 90 unduplicated students. Classes are scheduled to be held at 350 North Brand Blvd, St. 155, Glendale, CA 91206. Hamazkayin is seeking funds to pay for instructors.

AESA STEM Academy $0
Armenian Engineers & Scientists of America
Armenian Engineers & Scientists of America (AESA) is requesting $47,700 to provide two (2) programs: STEM Program and Science Olympiad program to low- and moderate-income students of Middle school through High School age with the opportunity to learn STEM education and mentoring, through science fairs and competitions. The programs are proposed to be conducted at various locations (Ribet 59 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
2 Academy and Academy USA). AESA address is 326 Mira Loma Ave, Glendale CA 91204.

Community Outreach Program
$60,000
Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, Inc.

Armenian Relief Society (ARS) is requesting $94,193 to continue to provide the Community Outreach Program to low-moderate income individuals, adults, disabled adults, and seniors. Service delivery activities include: ESL and Life Skills Classes for 120 seniors, 110 individuals to receive Job Search Assistance, Employment, and Placement, and 100 disabled adults to receive case management, benefits enrollment, and other social services.

Target population includes Glendale residents with limited English language proficiency. Community Outreach Program is an existing program with services offered and conducted throughout the year. ARS services and classes are held at 517 West Glenoaks Blvd, Glendale, CA 91202.

Homeless Outreach Program $25,000
Ascencia
Ascencia is requesting $44,292 in CDBG funding for the existing Homeless Outreach Program to outreach and engage homeless people in Glendale and adjacent areas where they sometimes stay and connect them to services. Ascencia’s Homeless Outreach program is located at 1851 Tyburn Street. Case managers distribute essential provisions such as food, water, and warm clothing to homeless persons on the streets.

Case Managers also connect homeless persons including veterans, to health and mental health services, provide transportation to appointments and assist in obtaining identification and birth certificates. The goal of the program is to build relationships with long time “service resistant” chronically homeless persons, share information and resources about the program services and provide onsite case management. The team engages homeless people on the streets of Glendale and connects clients to services with the goal of ultimately moving clients into permanent housing.

Glendale Loaves & Fishes Program $35,000
Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc.

Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc is requesting $140,210 to fund an existing homeless prevention program. The program provides case management, referrals, advocacy, and social supportive services to primarily low income, non or limited English speaking immigrant individuals and families who are at imminent risk of becoming homeless. These families are in poverty and many receive public assistance. The Program is offered at the Glendale Community Center located at 4322 San Fernando Road. The program proposes to provide homeless prevention services to address food insecurity, case management, and supportive services. Services will include: assisting 60 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
3 households with food pantry, immigration/refugee services, job search assistance, languages assistance, life skills training and workshops, nutrition information/care, health care access, and citizenship preparation classes.

Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling Program $33,000 Committee for Armenian Students in Public Schools
CASPS is an existing program which is requesting $66,263 in funding to administer the Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling Program for K-6 elementary students at 4 Glendale GUSD schools (Columbus, Muir, Mann, and Cerritos). CASPS will continue to operate the program for 100 “at-risk” unduplicated students who face academic, behavioral, and /or social skill issues at four GUDSD schools. The program aims to serve 25 students at each school. The overall goal of the program is to provide 3 ten week sessions of counseling which include Play Therapy and Expressive Therapy to help with self-awareness, improve self-esteem and motivation. The program is conducted by an experienced licensed Clinical Psychologist, and professional in the field of counseling. CASPS administrative offices are located at 6252 Honolulu Ave, La Crescenta, 91214. Target population is chosen by a team of GUSD principals, administrators and teachers who make a recommendation for services to GUSD students and their families.

Door of Hope Domestic Violence Services
$22,000
Door of Hope
Door of Hope (DOH) is requesting $70,000 to continue to provide services for Transitional Housing, Case Management, and Mental Health to adults and children fleeing domestic violence. The project will provide onsite therapy services to 22 adult residents and 10 youth and case management services to all adult residents, and to shelter these families at the undisclosed location. Program Service Activities include: 1) mental health, 2) case management, 3) shelter, as well as food assistance, financial literacy, life skills, children/youth services, and homeless prevention and permanent housing assistance. The site of the services is called Hamilton Court and is at an undisclosed location due to the nature of the services.

Crisis Housing Support $15,000
Home Again LA
Home Again Los Angeles, formerly Family Promise of the Verdugos is requesting $74,958 in CDBG funding for the existing Crisis Housing Support program focusing on aiding the Glendale homeless population by transitioning unsheltered families with children back into permanent housing. Services include: 1) Immediately placing homeless families into shelter or transitional housing; 2) Providing housing search and placement support for permanent housing, working with landlords and advocates to place families and 3) Providing supportive services to include job development, 61 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
4 financial planning. Home Again Los Angeles program is 134 North Kenwood, 4th floor, Glendale, CA 91206.

Youth Employment Program $20,000
Glendale Youth Alliance
Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) is requesting $60,000 to continue to operate the Youth Employment Program. The Program currently operates five (5) youth mentorship programs through Glendale Youth Employment Partnership (GYEP) and Glendale Resource for Employment and Training (GREAT). GYA proposes to provide employment training and mentored work experience to 50-60 at risk youth ages 14-24 annually. These programs are operated continuously during the summer month and during the school year. GYA provides the youth with pre-employment training skills, employment skills, communication skills, work experience, supportive services, and case management, GYA operates out of the Verdugo Jobs Center, located at 1255 South Central Ave, in Glendale.

Fair Housing Program $20,300
Housing Rights Center
The Housing Rights Center (HRC) is requesting $20,300 in CDBG funds to continue providing fair housing and landlord/tenant services to 350 Glendale residents with filing fair housing complaints. HRC provides services in four main areas: 1) Discrimination Complaint Investigation, 2) Landlord/Tenant Counseling, 3) Education and Outreach, and 4) Fair Housing Legal Services. HRC will conduct 2 fair housing workshops for Glendale tenants and property owners/managers per year. HRC collaborates with local agencies to provide multi-lingual outreach, education programs, and workshops in Armenian, Cantonese, Korean, Mandarin, Russian, and Spanish. Services are targeted primarily to low and moderate income individuals of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. HRC is located at 3255 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1150 in Los Angeles. HRC points out that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requires jurisdictions that receive CDBG funding to affirmatively further fair housing, and HRC has been working in partnership with the City to help fulfill this requirement through CDBG and Community Development Department’s Housing Division. .

Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence $24,597
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena
YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena (YWCA) is requesting $31,112 to provide an existing Clinical Program offering no cost, trauma informed individuals and group therapy to victims of domestic violent and their children who have experienced trauma. Services are available Monday through Friday from 9:00am to 6:00pm. Counseling is provided by licensed marriage and family therapist and social workers in session at both the emergency shelter and business center by way of short term therapy (15 sessions) and 62 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
5 group session therapy (12-week session). The service locations are 735 East Lexington Drive, Glendale, CA 91202 and at the undisclosed Sunrise Village Shelter.

TOTAL SOCIAL SERVICES FUNDED $264,747
TOTAL CDBG FUNDS AVAILABLE $264,747
DIFFERENCE $0

CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COMMUNITY AGENCIES:

RECOMMENDED

FUNDING
CDBG Re-piping Project (Addtl) $20,000
Ascencia
Ascencia is requesting $38,424 for the complete replacement and upgrade of the plumbing system which includes re-piping of all rough plumbing. Re-piping hot and cold-water supply lines with approved transitional fitting and chlorinated polyvinyl chloride pipes, which is recommended for commercial and industrial applications to withstand higher temperatures. Scope of Work includes re-routing of condensation lines for the air conditioning unit to discharge to proper existing drains and locations, installation of a new Grundfos Recirculation pump and timer, running of System Functionality Test (SFT), and patch and repair areas impacted by required access to existing piping.

Ascencia Access Center at 1951 Tyburn Street in Glendale was adapted from masonry constructed warehouse building in 1983 and the current structure is 11,500 sq. ft., housing office space for services and administration and a 45- bed shelter for homeless families and individuals. Amenities include a commercial kitchen, accessible showers (upstairs/downstairs), laundry room, conference room and dining room.

Repairing & Repaving Parking Lot, Driverway, Front Parking $247,500 Homenetmen Glendale Ararat Chapter Main Campus
Homenetmen Glendale “Ararat” Chapter is requesting $247,500 to repair and repave the parking lot, driveway, and front parking lot of their Main Campus sports facility. The request is to add on to the facility with an outdoor basketball/volleyball court and renovation of the outdoor lot of 3347 N. San Fernando Road, Los Angeles, CA 90065.

Expansion to update and resurface outdoor lot and tun it into an outdoor sports court, to hold basketball, volleyball and soccer.
63 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
6 The Scope of Work includes: removal of existing asphalt across 21,140 sq. ft., haul and dump. Removal of existing asphalt over existing concrete slab across 13,860 sq. ft., haul and dump. Installation of new catch basin drain, installation of crushed miscellaneous base and compact to proper compaction, pave 21,140 sq. ft. and 13,860 sq. ft. of A/C, apply one coat of A/C seal , stripe parking stalls with car stops.

The Main Campus(MC) Athletic Center of the Homenetmen “Ararat” Chapter was built in the 1960’s and is located at 3347 N. San Fernando Road, Los Angeles. The MC property is 65,000 sq. ft. with the facility space being 35,000 sq. ft., serving approximately 2,100 members annually. The Main Campus is a sports facilities used for basketball, volleyball, indoor soccer, gymnastics, martial arts, and table tennis.

Public Safety Improvement to NLSLA Parking Lot
$120,000
Neighborhood Legal Services of LA County
Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County (NLSLA) is requesting $220,593 for the rehabilitation and upgrade of 20-year-old parking lot adjacent to its Adams Square Building at 1100-04 Chevy Chase Drive where NLSLA employees, NLSLA patrons, and Glendale Library staff use the space to park their vehicles. Scope of Work includes: 1) Landscaping (planting, irrigation, mulch, stepping stones, and sidewalk paving; 2) Parking (concrete curb, paving, demo and replacement of sidewalk, concrete apron, parking stop block, signage, and A/C paving; 3) Lighting (light pole, site electrical); 4) Fence, Gate Operator.

NLSLA purchased the 19,000 sq. ft. building 20 years ago which was built in the 1920’s or 1930’s. Agency to verify the square footage of the parking lot which they proposal to improve. NLSLA uses the building as their executive offices and local field office to provide legal assistance up to 500 unduplicated low-income Glendale households per year. Adjacent to the building is the City of Glendale’s Adams Square Library that is also located as part of the NLSLA Building.

Community Services Center $92,696
Verdugo Hill Council, Boy Scouts of America
Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts of America is requesting $100,000 for facility improvements to their newly acquired property and headquarters at 421 North Glendale Ave, Glendale, CA 91206. Scope of Work includes: upgrading the building electrical infrastructure , rewiring and replumbing the interior, modifying the roof structure to remove damaged and leaking windows, replacing the roof with new material, replacing all of the HVAC with new units, replacing interior lighting with new energy efficient units, replacing the 2 existing ground floor restrooms with ADA compliant restrooms, adding an ADA compliant restroom to the 2 nd floor, and a wheelchair lift to the interior of the building to provide ADA compliant access to 2 nd floor, and reformatting of interior walls for office space, new flooring and paint throughout the building. 64 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
7 Community Service Center at the old Charles Music Store in Glendale was built in the 1950’s, with 1st and 2 nd floor additions added in 1970’s. The current structure is 4,372 sq. ft., and was used for retail, office, and meeting space.

FY 2023-24 First Floor All-Inclusive Locker Room Project $0 YMCA of Glendale
The YMCA of Glendale is returning a third time to request funding in the amount of $546,510 for the conversion of the girl’s/boys locker room into a large family locker room on the first floor that proposes to provide accessibility and be inclusive. The scope of work includes: 11 individually enclosed private showers with a flip bench, full height doors, and hardware. Six (6) new sinks which include 1 ADA sink on a new counter with new plumbing fixtures. The co-ed locker room will have 2 new family changing ADA restrooms equipped with sink, shower, toilet, flip bench, and changing stations. Additions include individual enclosed private toilet compartments, tile, carpet flooring, and proper drainage throughout. New Gypsum Board ceiling, lighting and mechanical diffuser will be provided. The coed locker room will have new benches, lockers, shelf and mirror for patron’s use, a new storage and all exposed wall and columns are to be enclosed and painted.

The YMCA is a 55,000 sq. ft. facility built in 1977 and located at 140 N Louise St, Glendale, CA 91206 offering numerous programs designed for health and fitness. The YMCA proposes to serve 800 unduplicated adults, seniors and family members including special needs adults ages 18-22.

The conversion will allow patrons who would normally use the women’s second floor locker room or the men’s basement floor locker room which can only be accessed by elevator to be able to have a first floor accessibly for all. Additional services, such as clothing, food, and access to resources for employment and housing are also provided.

YMCA posted three Bid Notices. First bid had no contractor interest. The 2 remaining bid notices had contractor interest but only one contractor submitted a bid which was estimated to be over $1.2 million dollars; therefore the Agency is returning for additional funding to close the gap and begin the project.

SUBTOTAL COMMUNITY AGENCIES $480,196

TOTAL ESTIMATED CAPITAL RFP FUNDS AVAILABLE
$480,196
DIFFERENCE $0
CITY DEPARTMENTS:

Pacific Park Natural Grass Project $667,042
Community Services & Parks
65 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
8 This project is sponsored by the Community Services & Parks Department. The Pacific Park baseball field natural turf refurbishment project will provide for improved field grading to address drainage accumulation at home plate, include the center field expansion to better accommodate a soccer field overlay and new drainage pick-up devices to collect run-off water. The new field will be regraded with new irrigation installed with new hybrid Bermuda grass outfield and infield. The back stop will remain as existing. New field side dugout fencing and new bull pens will be installed. Drainage enhancements will be added and the infield will be reconstructed. Task 1 Design Development - This task will consist of preparing a conceptual grading plan, field edge construction detailing, and the preparation of a construction budget estimate. This design development plan will be submitted for city staff review. Task 2 Construction Documents - The previously prepared refurbishment plans will be modified to the construction of a new natural turf baseball field. These plans will be submitted to the city for Building and Safety approval. Task 3 Final Construction Documents - Upon city review and comment final construction plans will be prepared for public bidding of the project.

SUBTOTAL $667,042
TOTAL CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT $667,042
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $667,042
DIFFERENCE $0

ADMINISTRATION
Administration of Community Development Block Grant Program $352,996
TOTAL CDBG FUNDS AVAILABLE: $1,764,982
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: $ 0
$1,764,982
II. EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) PROGRAM
Emergency Housing Program $33,703
Ascencia
Ascencia is requesting $33,703 in ESG funding for operations of its existing 45-bed year-round Emergency Housing Program for homeless families and individuals. The program is proposing to serve 180 unduplicated clients with the length of stay ranging from 90 to 120 days. Ascencia is located at 1851 Tyburn Street in Glendale; it is the only year-round homeless shelter in the City of Glendale. It is also one of the few shelters in Los Angeles County that accepts families and individuals, including families with teenage children, single fathers, and pregnant women. Ascencia uses a client- 66 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
9 centered “whatever it takes” approach to ensure that clients remain stably housed whether participate in rapid re-housing or other options. This approach unfolds in a five- stage process: 1) outreach and engagement; 2) assessment; 3) short-term case management to address immediate needs; 4) housing search and placement; and 5) post-placement services to help clients integrate into the new neighborhood and achieve stability. Ascencia’s Access Center which serves as Glendale’s Coordinates Entry System will leverage screening, assessment, and case management services.

This may include medical and/or mental health treatment, money management, employment assistance, substance abuse treatment, parenting training, benefits advocacy, family law assistance, transportation planning, and life skills. Ascencia’s three-person outreach team aid in building rapport with clients and acting as initial contact and conducts preliminary needs assessments. Ascencia works closely with first responders, including Glendale police, the fire department, and hospital emergency rooms, to initiate services for people who are homeless. Ascencia actively participates in a variety of coalitions, as well as public and private meetings such as Glendale Domestic Violence Task Force, Glendale healthier Community Coalition, Verdugo job Center Management Collaborative, etc.

Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program – ESG $37,236 Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc.

Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. shall receive $37,236 in ESG funding to provide financial assistance to 20 households in the Glendale area. The Loaves and Fishes Homeless Prevention Program provides case management and social services to poor and low-income individuals and families who are at imminent risk of becoming homeless. These families live primarily at poverty and low-income levels, with most receiving public assistance and free or reduced price school meals for children. Many are non or limited English speaking immigrant families who have come to Los Angeles from various South and Central American, Middle Eastern and Asian countries; most are first or second generation immigrants. A large portion of the clients seeking help reside in the 91204 and 91205 zip codes, the area immediately surrounding the Glendale Community Center. The program provides case management services in addition to financial assistance to individuals and families meeting the following criteria:
a) have received an eviction notice or Notice of Termination of utilities services; b) need security deposit or a portion of rent for an individual/family who is at-risk of homelessness to move into his/her own apartment; c) need mediation or advocacy with the landlord or the utility company; and d) need case management and follow-up supportive services to prevent homelessness.

Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency Shelter Program
$26,500
YWCA of Glendale
The YWCA of Glendale is requesting $26,500 for the ongoing operation of their Sunrise Village Emergency Shelter and to provide housing/homeless prevention services for women and their children who have become homeless as a result of domestic violence.

The YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena will be leveraging State funds to also provide 67 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
10 prevention services to those seeking services at the shelter. The YWCA proposes to serve a minimum of 100 unduplicated households for FY 21-22. Access to the emergency shelter is through the emergency shelter 24-hour hotline and drop-in center.

Services are designed to help domestic violence victims and survivors achieve and maintain safety during and after their 45-90-day stay in the emergency shelter. Clients are provided with support that includes survivor-driven housing advocacy, housing stability, community engagement and financial literacy. Clients are provided with food, clothing, emergency transportation, case management, counseling, information and referrals, and advocacy. In addition, Sunrise Village provides multiple activities and scheduled programs for women and their children, including parenting classes, individual and family counseling. The goal of the DV Housing and Emergency Shelter Program is to provide services to empower women and their children Rapid Re-housing Program
$51,365
Home Again Los Angeles
This new rapid rehousing project is designed to mobilize unsheltered families with children in Glendale into permanent housing while giving them the comprehensive case management services that lead to self-sufficiency. Services rendered include: CES assessments, housing navigation, security deposit assistance, up to six months of rental assistance, and stabilization services that include financial education and employment securement. The purpose of the project is to transition unsheltered families back into housing and provide them the financial support needed to overcome their barriers, while educating the households on how to become self-sufficient and able to take over their apartment lease by the culmination of the program.

Administration of ESG PROGRAM (Agency Admin) $3,403
TOTAL ESG PROGRAM $152,207
TOTAL ESG FUNDS AVAILABLE $152,207
DIFFERENCE $0
III. HOME PROGRAM
Affordable Rental Development – New Construction and/or $1,299,127 Acquisition/Rehab Program
Community Development Department
Glendale will provide new construction and/or acquisition/rehabilitation loans to affordable rental housing developers for development of new or rehabilitation of existing rental housing units. Glendale will require that the improved or newly constructed units be rented to low- or 68 of 155

EXHIBIT 2
11 very low-income households at affordable rental rates for a specified period of time as secured by Affordable Housing Covenants on the property.

CHDO Reserve (15%) $236,425
Administration of HOME Program $170,617

HOME FUNDS AVAILABLE
$1,576,169
HOME Program Income $
130,000
TOTAL HOME FUNDS AVAILABLE $1,706,169
69 of 155

CDBG CIP PROJECTS 2016-2024
FY2023-2024 Project #
Fremont Park Reno-23/24
Total
FY2022-2023 Project #
Repiping Project-Ascencia 22/23 CSP00865AG
Locker Room CIP-YMCA 22/23 CSP00874AG
Hamilton CIP-Campbell Center 22/23 CSP00871AG
Lexington CIP-YWCA 22/23 CSP00876AG
Fremont Park Reno-22/23 CSP00686BG
Total
FY2021-2022 Project #
Glendale Youth Center CIP-ACF 21/22 CSP00706AG
Restoorm CIP MC-Home Ararat 21/22 CSP00708AG
Alma House-Campbell Center 21/22 CSP00707AG
Locker Room CIP-YMCA 21/22 CSP00626AG
Pacific Park Splash Pad 21/22 CSP00709AG
Total
FY2020-2021 Project #
Roofing Project-MC-Home Ararat 20/21 CSP00433AG
Roof Improv Glen Comm Ctr-CC 20/21 CSP00427AG
Total
FY2019-2020 Project #
Bleachers at MC-Home Ararat 19/20 CSP000129G
HVAC at MC-Home Ararat 19/20 CSP000130G
Glen Comm Ctr Improv-CC 19/20 CSP000131G
Pacific Park Multi-Purp Field 19/20 CSP00133AG
Fremont Park Reno-22/23 CSP00686BG
Total
FY2018-2019 Project #
Pacific Park Artificial Turf Multi-Purpose Field Project G619316 Pacific Park Playground and Pool Shade Structures Project G619314 Fremont Park Reno-22/23 CSP00686BG
Total
FY2017-2018 Project #
Pacific Park Playground and Pool Shade Structures Project G618314 Pacific Park Splash Pad G618315
Fremont Park Reno-22/23 CSP00686BG
70 of 155

Total
FY2016-2017 Project #
Pacific Park Artificial Turf Multi-Purpose Field Project G619316 Pacific Park Playground and Pool Shade Structure Project G619314 Locker Room CIP-YMCA 21/22 CSP00626AG
Fremont Park Reno-22/23 CSP00686BG
Total
CDBG CIP Grand Total (does not include Program Admin/PSS) 2022-2023 CDBG Entitlement Grant Amount $ 1,731,797.00

1.5 times entitlement amount to drawdown by April 2023 $ 2,597,696.00 71 of 155

IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
$ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 Monday, September 30, 2030
$ 400,000.00
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1186 $ 31,840.00 $ 31,840.00 Sunday, September 30, 2029 1188 $ 179,000.00 $ 179,000.00 Sunday, September 30, 2029 1187 $ 377,883.50 $ 377,883.50 Sunday, September 30, 2029 1189 $ 377,883.50 $ 377,883.50 Sunday, September 30, 2029 1190 $ 159,061.00 $ 159,061.00 Sunday, September 30, 2029 $ 1,125,668.00 $ 1,125,668.00
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1162 $ 116,000.00 $ 116,000.00 Saturday, September 30, 2028 1160 $ 206,518.00 $ 206,518.00 Saturday, September 30, 2028 1161 $ 197,858.00 $ 197,858.00 Saturday, September 30, 2028 1159 $ 334,495.00 $ 334,495.00 Saturday, September 30, 2028 1163 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 Saturday, September 30, 2028 $ 1,254,871.00 $ 1,254,871.00
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1111 $ 193,270.00 $ 193,270.00 Thursday, September 30, 2027 1112 $ 123,988.00 $ 123,988.00 Thursday, September 30, 2027 $ 317,258.00 $ 317,258.00
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1084 $ 60,638.00 $ 60,638.00 Wednesday, September 30, 2026 1083 $ 95,113.00 $ 95,113.00 Wednesday, September 30, 2026 1079 $ 256,800.00 $ 256,800.00 Wednesday, September 30, 2026 1080 $ 350,000.00 $ 350,000.00 Wednesday, September 30, 2026 1190 $ 10,361.14 $ 10,361.14 Wednesday, September 30, 2026 $ 772,912.14 $ 772,912.14
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1065 $ 370,000.00 $ 370,000.00 Tuesday, September 30, 2025 1061 $ 13,320.00 $ 13,320.00 Tuesday, September 30, 2025 1190 $ 11,867.44 $ 11,867.44 Tuesday, September 30, 2025 $ 395,187.44 $ 395,187.44
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1035 $ 79,792.00 $ 45,069.59 Monday, September 30, 2024 1039 $ 370,000.00 $ 370,000.00 Monday, September 30, 2024 1190 $ 24,203.50 $ 24,203.50 Monday, September 30, 2024 CDBG CIP PROJECTS 2016-2024
72 of 155

$ 473,995.50 $ 439,273.09 Monday, September 30, 2024
IDIS Activity # Awarded To be Drawn US TREASURY GRAB
1065 $ 370,000.00 $ 370,000.00 Saturday, September 30, 2023 1061 $ 24,680.00 $ 24,680.00 Saturday, September 30, 2023 1159 $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 Saturday, September 30, 2023 1190 $ 18,329.25 $ 18,329.25 Saturday, September 30, 2023 $ 478,009.25 $ 478,009.25
$ 4,817,901.33 $ 4,783,178.92
$ 2,597,696.00
73 of 155

Project Name Program Year
Fremont Park Renovation 2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
2022-2023
Total
Project Name Program Year
Pacific Natural Grass Project* 2016-2017
2017-2018
2018-2019
2019-2020
2021-2022
2022-2023
2023-2024
Total
Project Name Program Year
Pacific Park Playground and Pool Shade Structure Project 2016-2017 Pacific Park Playground and Pool Shade Structures Project 2017-2018 Pacific Park Splash Pad 2017-2018
Pacific Park Playground and Pool Shade Structures Project 2018-2019 Pacific Park Splash Pad 2021-2022
Pacific Park Splash Pad 2023-2024
Total
Project Name Program Year
Locker Room CIP-YMCA 2016-2017
2019-2020
2021-2022
2022-2023
Total
Project Name Program Year
Hamilton CIP-Campbell Center 2022-2023
74 of 155

Total
Project Name Program Year
Alma CIP-Campbell Center 2020-2021
2022-2023
Total
75 of 155

Current Funding Proposed Change
Proposed New Total
Project Budget
$ 18,329.25 $ (18,329.25) $ -
$ 24,203.50 $ (24,203.50) $ -
$ 11,867.44 $ (11,867.44) $ -
$ 10,361.14 $ (10,361.14) $ -
$ 159,061.00 $ (159,061.00) $ -
$ 223,822.33 $ (223,822.33) $ -
Current Funding Proposed Change
Proposed New Total
Project Budget
$ 370,000.00 $ (370,000.00) $ -
$ - $ 24,203.50 $ 24,203.50
$ 370,000.00 $ 11,867.44 $ 381,867.44
$ 350,000.00 $ 10,361.14 $ 360,361.14
$ - $ 35,299.00 $ 35,299.00
$ - $ 103,443.50 $ 103,443.50
$ - $ -
$ 1,090,000.00 $ (184,825.42) $ 905,174.58
Current Funding Proposed Change
Proposed New Total
Project Budget
$ 24,680.00 $ (24,680.00) $ -
$ 45,069.00 $ - $ 45,069.00
$ 370,000.00 $ - $ 370,000.00
$ 13,320.00 $ - $ 13,320.00
$ 400,000.00 $ - $ 400,000.00
$ - $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00
$ 853,069.00 $ 375,320.00 $ 1,228,389.00
Current Funding Proposed Change
Proposed New Total
Project Budget
$ 65,000.00 $ 413,009.25 $ 478,009.25
$ 179,000.00 $ - $ 179,000.00
$ 334,495.00 $ - $ 334,495.00
$ - $ 133,501.00 $ 133,501.00
$ 578,495.00 $ 546,510.25 $ 1,125,005.25
Current Funding Proposed Change
Proposed New Total
Project Budget
$ 377,883.50 $ (377,883.50) $ -
76 of 155

$ 377,883.50 $ (377,883.50) $ -
Current Funding Proposed Change
Proposed New Total
Project Budget
$ 197,858.00 $ - $ 197,858.00
$ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00
$ 197,858.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 497,858.00
77 of 155

Notes
Shift to YMCA
Shift to Pacific Natural Grass
Shift to Pacific Natural Grass
Shift to Pacific Natural Grass
Shift to YMCA ($133,501) & Pacific Natural
Grass ($25,560)
Notes
Shift to YMCA
From Fremont Park Renovation
From Fremont Park Renovation
From Fremont Park Renovation
From ACF Returned Funds
From Hamilton House Project ($77,883 &
Fremont Park Renov ($25,560)
New Allocation from FY 2023-2024
Notes
Shift to YMCA
No Change
No Change
No Change
New Allocation from FY 2023-2024
Notes
From Fremont & Pacific Natural Grass &
Pacific Park Playground & Pool Shade
Structure
No Change
No Change
From Fremont Park Renovation
Notes
Shift to Alma & Pacific Natural Grass
78 of 155

Notes
No Change
From Hamilton House Project
79 of 155

EXHIBIT 3
2023-2024 CDBG CIP FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS

PROGRAM
FY 2022-2023

CURRENT FUNDING
FY 23-24

REQUESTED

FUNDING
Proposed
Reprogrammed Funds
from Previous Prog
Years
FY 23-24

RECOMMENDED
FUNDING Difference
PRE-APPROVED CITY PROJECTS:

Pacific Park Splash Pad (Previously designated to Fremont Park Renovation Project) $ 400,000.00 $ 245,812.58 $(154,187.42) Pacific Natural Grass Project $ 667,042.00
FUNDING REQUEST CITY PROJECTS SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 400,000.00 $ 245,812.58 $ 667,042.00 COMMUNITY PROJECTS:
1 Ascencia-CDBG Re-Piping Project (additional funding) $ 31,840.00 $ 38,424.00 $ 20,000.00 $ (18,424.00) 2 Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts- Community Service Center $ - $ 92,696.00 $ 92,696.00 $ - 3 Homenetmen Ararat Chapter-Repairing & Repaving of the Parking Lot, Driveway, Front Parking Lot$ 555,539.00 $ 247,500.00 $ 247,500.00 $ - 4 Neighborhood Legal Services of LA County- Public Safety Improvement to NLSLA Parking Lot$ - $ 220,593.00 $ 120,000.00 $(100,593.00) 5 YMCA of Glendale-FY23-24 First Floor All-Inclusive Locker Room Project $ 578,495.00 $ 546,510.25 $ 546,510.25 $ - FUNDING REQUEST COMMUNITY PROJECTS SUB-TOTAL $1,145,723.25 $ 546,510.25 $ 480,196.00 TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTS FOR CITY/COMMUNITY AGENCY $1,545,723.25 $ 792,322.83 $ 1,147,238.00

PREVIOUS YEAR COMMUNITY PROJECTS REQUESTING FUNDS
ALMA HOUSE $ 300,000.00
TOTAL PREVIOUS YEAR COMMUNITY PROJECTS $ 1,092,322.83
FY 2023-2024 CDBG CIP AVAILABLE FUNDS $1,147,238.00 $ 1,147,238.00 RETURNED FUNDS FROM ACF FROM FY 2021-2022 $ 35,299.00
RETURNED FUNDS FROM HOMENETMEN ARARAT BLEACHERS FROM 2019-2020 $ 60,638.00 RETURNED FUNDS FROM PREVIOUS FY 2016-2023 (All of 2016-2017 & Fremont Park Renov) $ 618,502.33 RETURNED FUNDS FROM HAMILTON HOUSE CIP FY 22-23 $ 377,883.50 TOTAL PREVIOUS FY AVAILABLE FUNDS $ 1,092,322.83
Difference $ - $ -
80 of 155

EXHIBIT 3
Summary List of FY 2023-2024 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended For Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations

PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES

AGENCY PROGRAM
FY 23-24
Requested
Funding
FY 23-24
Recommende
d Funding
based on
Final HUD
Allocation
Difference
1 Armenian Bar Association Pro Bono Legal Services $ 48,840.00 $20,000.00 ######### 2 Armenian Cultural Association, HamazkayinIntergenerational Experiences $ 54,400.00 $0.00 ######### 3 Armenian Engineers and Scientists of AmericaAESA STEM Academy $ 47,700.00 $0.00 ######### 4 Armenian Relief Society Community Outreach Program $ 94,193.00 $60,000.00 ######### 5 Ascencia Homeless Outreach Program $ 44,292.00 $25,000.00 ######### 6 Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. Glendale Community Center Loaves & Fishes Program$ 140,210.00 $35,000.00 ######### 7 Committee for Armenian Students in Public SchoolsIntervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling $ 66,263.00 $33,000.00 ######### 8 Door of Hope Door of Hope Domestic Violence Services $ 70,000.00 $22,000.00 ######### 9 Home Again, Los Angeles Crisis Housing Support $ 74,958.00 $15,000.00 ######### 10 Glendale Youth Alliance Youth Employment Program $ 60,000.00 $20,000.00 ######### 11 Housing Rights Center Fair Housing Program $ 20,300.00 $10,150.00 ######### 12 YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence$ 31,112.00 $24,597.00 ($6,515.00) TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES $752,268.00 $264,747.00
FUNDS AVAILABLE $264,747.00 $264,747.00
DEFICIT/SURPLUS ($487,521.00) $0.00 $0.00
81 of 155

Exhibit 4
1 Summary of Public Hearing and Public Comments
Regarding the City of Glendale’s
Proposed FY 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan for
CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs
Public Hearing, April 12, 2023, Pacific Community Center, 501 S. Pacific Avenue:

The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:10 p.m.
6 total in attendance.

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager opened the public hearing for the FY 2023- 2024 Annual Plan and introduced city staff in attendance. Tereza Aleksanian, Arsineh Isayan, and Tamar Kabanjian helped to present during the meeting.

City staff provided a Power Point presentation which included: purpose of the meeting, a flowchart of the CDBG Annual Program Planning Process FY2023-2024; CDBG funding allocation plan, and the proposed FY2023-2024 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant, and HOME Programs; and encouraged public comment.

During the presentations, attendees were provided in depth review of the Program Planning Process Chart, each month’s process and highlights of the steps in the process to conduct the public hearing to review and obtain comments from the public regarding the proposed funding recommendations for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs.

Ms. Kavarian stated that the funding recommendations will be submitted to the City Council for final approval on May 23, 2023. Presentation included: Proposal Evaluation Process to the attendees and explained how City Staff receive, evaluate, and prepare the proposals for CDBG Advisory Board review. Highlights of the CDBG Advisory Board Meeting on March 3, 2023 and March 6, 2023 and the deliberation and decision making process of the Board was presented.

Ms. Isayan explained the ESG program process and how agencies are funded to combat Homelessness welcoming and encouraging public comment.

Next, Ms. Kavarian explained the HOME program and the upcoming projects in the pipeline for affordable housing by use of HOME funds.

The public was also reminded that all comments would be submitted to the City Council and Housing Authority in writing.

1. Pedro Ramirez, Comprehensive Community Health Centers (CCHC) Director of Outreach & Community Engagement: Mr. Ramirez expressed that the presentation was excellent, and all agencies/grantees deserved the fundings to serve the underserved population of the City. Wanted to learn more about CDBG funding.

2. Michell Torres, Comprehensive Community Health Centers (CCHC): expressed that the presentation was excellent, and all agencies/grantees deserved the fundings to serve 82 of 155

Exhibit 4
2 the underserved population of the City. Wanted to tell the public about the mobile health van that was coming to the City of Glendale for underserved populations.

3. Neal Dudovitz, Neighborhood Legal Services of LA, Executive Director: My comment is the HUD funding that is provided to the Agencies for Social Service Programs; The CDBG offers great opportunity for Agencies to take advantage on providing Social Service Programs to the Community. However, the amount that is provided for Social Services Program is not enough, because it is costly and time consuming to work on the programs itself as well as provided the services to the Community. We understand that it is not in your hands, and it is something decided from HUD. However, I want to share my thoughts that the amount given to agencies to work on social programs is not enough money to process the Programs and assure all the paperwork that CDBG staff requires is being met, especially in rise in prices and fees we as Agencies are having challenging to run the programs with the limited funding provided. All Agencies have great programs that want to work with the community; unfortunately, it comes down to the amount that they are given, we see great programs being either cancelled or they are not able to offer to a large scale of the community due to the amount received. I hope that HUD increases the budget available in Social Services.

Ms. Kavarian thanked everyone for attending the meeting and officially closed the Public Hearing.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:02 p.m.

Public Hearing, April 13, 2023, Via Microsoft Teams:

The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:10 p.m.

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager opened the public hearing for the FY 2023- 2024 Annual Plan and introduced dignitaries and city staff in attendance. Arsineh Isayan and Pamela Jackson helped to present during the meeting. Nicole Ordubegian used the Teams chat box feature to respond to attendee comments.

Ms. Kavarian, Ms. Isayan, and Ms. Jackson provided a Power Point presentation which included: purpose of the meeting, a flowchart of the CDBG Annual Program Planning Process FY2023-2024; CDBG funding allocation plan, and the proposed FY2023-2024 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant, and HOME Programs; and encouraged public comment.

During the presentations Ms. Kavarian explained the program planning process, briefly highlighted the steps in the process that led to public hearing and review to obtain comments from the public for FY2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs. She explained the Proposal Evaluation Process and how the CDBG Advisory Committee met on March 3 and March 6, 2023, to review the proposals, interview the agencies and make funding recommendations.
83 of 155

Exhibit 4
3 Ms. Kavarian reviewed the proposed Annual Action Plan for FY23-24 and stated that the funding recommendations will be submitted to the City Council for final approval on May 23, 2023.

1. Marina Manoukian, CDBG Advisory Committee Board Member:

Ms. Manoukian explained that this was her first time going through the CDBG process of having to review proposals and make difficult funding recommendations based on limited funding.

2. Jessica Asuelime, Glendale Resident: No questions, this is great and glad to hear all of this information. It was clearly presented. Thank you.

After encouraging for more comments and reminding the public to share information into the chat box, Ms. Kavarian thanked everyone for attending the meeting and officially closed the Public Hearing.

The Meeting was adjourned at 7:44 p.m.

Email comments were received.

1. Mimi Malkhassian, Resident ( [email protected]):

Most cities have bus day tours, such as Alhambra, San Gabriel, San Marino, Arcadia, and S.

Pasadena. Glendale Community center does not have any bus tours. Glendale has bus trips to casino's operated by private companies almost every day. It will be nice Glendale Community center to offer trips to museums or more educational trips. For example S.

Pasadena has offered Bowers Museum, Richard Nixon Presidential Library, Aquarium of the Pacific, SoFi Stadium, Sherman Library & Gardens, Missions, temples and festivals.

Thanks, Mimi Malkhassian
No Telephone Comments were received.
84 of 155

Exhibit 5

PUBLIC NOTICE

CITY OF GLENDALE

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:

The Community Development Department, after having conducted an Initial Study, has prepared a Negative Declaration for the following project:

Project Description:

The project includes the Action Plan for the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Programs for the City of Glendale.

Project Location:

Project Applicant:

Citywide, Glendale, Los Angeles County
City of Glendale
Community Services & Parks Department
613 E. Broadway, Room 120
Glendale, CA 91206
The Proposed Negative Declaration and all documents referenced therein are available for review in the Community Development Department, Planning Division office, Room 103 of the Municipal Services Building, 633 East Broadway, Glendale, California 91206-4386 and on the Planning Division website http://www.glendaleca.gov/environmental. For information on the proposed project and any upcoming public hearings and/or meetings please contact Maggie Kavarian in the Community Services & Parks Department at (818) 548-3715 or [email protected].

Written comments may be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division office, at the address listed above for a period of 20 days after publication of this notice.

Proposed Negative Declaration Comment Period: April 20, 2023, to May 10, 2023 Date Published: April 20, 2023
85 of 155

PROPOSED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs
The following Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Guidelines and Procedures of the City of Glendale.

Project Title/Common Name:

Project Location:

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs
Glendale, Los Angeles County, California: Glendale is located northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded by the cities of Burbank, Pasadena, La Canada Flintridge and the Los Angeles communities of Tujunga, Eagle Rock, and Los Feliz.

Project Description: Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department for the fiscal year 2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and HOME programs.

Project Type: Private Project Public Project
Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor
City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department 141 N. Glendale Avenue, Room 202
Project Applicant:

Glendale, CA 91206
Findings: The Director of the Community Development, on April 21, 2023, after considering an Initial Study prepared by the Planning Division, found that the above referenced project would not have a significant effect on the environment and instructed that a Negative Declaration be prepared.

Mitigation Measures:

Attachments:

No mitigation measures are required.

Initial Study Checklist
Contact Person: Erik Krause, Deputy Director of Community Development City of Glendale, Community Development Department
633 East Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206-4386
Tel: (818) 548-8157
Fax: (818) 240-0392
86 of 155

APRIL 2023
This page left intentionally blank.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 2
87 of 155

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs

1. 2.

Project Title: FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Glendale Community Development Department
Planning Division
633 East Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Erik Krause, Deputy Director of Community Development
Tel: (818) 937-8156
Fax: (818) 240-0392

4. 5.

Project Location: Glendale, Los Angeles County, California: Glendale is located northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded by the cities of Burbank, Pasadena, La Canada Flintridge and the Los Angeles communities of Tujunga, Eagle Rock and Los Feliz.

Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Maggie Kavarian, Senior Community Services Supervisor
City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department 141 N. Glendale Avenue, Room 202
Glendale, CA 91206

6. 7.

8. General Plan Designation: N/A
Zoning: N/A
Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to, later phases of the project, and any secondary support or off-site features necessary for its implementation.)
Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department for the fiscal year 2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME programs. See attached Action Plan for full description.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The projects are located throughout the City of Glendale, and as such the surrounding uses vary depending on location.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement).

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 3
88 of 155

89 of 155

APRIL 2023
A. AESTHETICS
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the project:

No
Impact
Incorporated

1. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X X

2. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?

3. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?

4. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
X
X
Comments to Sections A(1), (2), (3), and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on aesthetics as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand.

As such, these programs would not adversely affect scenic vistas, damage scenic resources, degrade the visual character of any sites or create substantial light or glare.

Potential aesthetic impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

B. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997, as updated) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 5
90 of 155

APRIL 2023
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
X
X2. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?

3. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code
Section 51104(g))?
X

4. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

5. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
X
X
Comments to Sections B(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5):

The City of Glendale does not contain any agricultural resources or lands currently zoned for agricultural uses; instead, Glendale is an urbanized area with a mixture of commercial, residential and industrial uses. Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs would not have a negative impact on agricultural resources because there is no “prime farmland,” “unique farmland” or “farmland of statewide importance” that could be converted to non-agricultural use; no existing zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act contracts; and no farmland that could be converted to non-agricultural use. There is no existing zoning of forest land or timberland in the City of Glendale. No forest land could be converted to non-forest use under the proposed project.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

C. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied on to make the following determinations.

Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?

2. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
X
X

3. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X
X

4. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 6
91 of 155

APRIL 2023
Comments to Sections C(1), (2), (3), and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on air quality as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect air quality.

Potential air quality impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service?
X

2. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

3. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?

4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
X
X
X

5. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X
X
Comments to Sections D(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on biological resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect biological resources.

Potential impacts on biological resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 7
92 of 155

APRIL 2023
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
X

2. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5?

3. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
X
X
Comments to Sections E(1), (2), and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on cultural resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect cultural resources.

Potential impacts on cultural resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

F. ENERGY
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?

2. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
X
X
Comments to Sections F(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on energy as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect energy consumption or obstruct with state of local energy plans.

Potential impacts on energy could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 8
93 of 155

APRIL 2023
G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.

X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
Xiii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? X
X2. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?

3. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on-or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?

4. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994, as
updated), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
X
X

5. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of waste water?
X
X6. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Comments to Sections F(1)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with geology and soils as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect geology and soils.

Potential impacts associated with geology and soils could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 9
94 of 155

APRIL 2023
H. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
X
X

2. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Comments to Sections H(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with greenhouse gases as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not result in direct or indirect impacts related to the generation of greenhouse gases or conflict with applicable plans.

Potential impacts associated with greenhouse gases could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
X
X

2. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?

3. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?

4. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
X
X

5. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?

6. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
X
X
X

7. Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 10
95 of 155

APRIL 2023
Comments to Sections I(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with hazards and hazardous materials as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect hazards and hazardous materials.

Potential impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

J. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface of groundwater quality?
X
X

2. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?

3. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off-site;
X
X
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
X
iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X
X4. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?

5. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
X
Comments to Sections J(1), (2), (3)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (4) and (5):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with hydrology and water quality as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect hydrology and water quality.

Potential impacts associated with hydrology and water quality could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 11
96 of 155

APRIL 2023
would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

K. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Physically divide an established community? X
X

2. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Comments to Sections K(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with land use and planning as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. Most of the programs are included in the City’s updated Housing Element adopted in December 2022. As such, these programs would not adversely affect land use and planning.

Potential impacts associated with land use and planning could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

L. MINERAL RESOURCES
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
X
X

2. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments to Sections L(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with the availability of know mineral resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect mineral resources.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 12
97 of 155

APRIL 2023
Potential impacts associated with the availability of know mineral resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

M. NOISE
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project result in:

Incorporated

1. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
X
X2. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?

3. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
X
Comments to Sections M(1), (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with noise as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect noise.

Potential impacts associated with noise could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

N. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
X
X

2. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 13
98 of 155

APRIL 2023
Comments to Sections N(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with population and housing as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect population and housing.

Potential impacts associated with population and housing could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

O. PUBLIC SERVICES
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? X
X
X
X
X
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
Comments to Sections O(1)(a),(b), (c), (d) and (e):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with public services as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect public services.

Potential impacts associated with public services could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 14
99 of 155

APRIL 2023
P. RECREATION
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Incorporated

1. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
X
X

2. Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Comments to Sections P(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on recreational facilities as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect recreational uses.

Conversely, the proposed programs included in the action plan would help to relieve existing pressure on the recreational facilities by providing after school programs away from park sites.

Potential impacts on recreational facilities could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Q. TRANSPORTATION
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?

2. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
X
X

3. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
X
X4. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Comments to Sections Q(1), (2), (3) and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on transportation as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand.

As such, these programs would not adversely affect transportation.

Potential impacts associated with transportation could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 15
100 of 155

APRIL 2023
evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

R. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in the
local register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
X
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to
a California Native American tribe.

Comments to Sections R(1)(i) and (ii):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on tribal cultural resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect tribal cultural resources.

Potential impacts associated with tribal cultural resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 16
101 of 155

APRIL 2023
S. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
ImpactWould the project:

Incorporated

1. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
X

2. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X
X

3. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?

4. Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?

5. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
X
X
Comments to Sections S(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on utilities and service systems as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect utilities and service systems.

Potential impacts on utilities and service systems could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

T. WILDFIRE
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
If located in or near state responsibility area or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Incorporated

1. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?

2. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
X

3. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel, breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
X
FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 17
102 of 155

APRIL 2023
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
If located in or near state responsibility area or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Incorporated

4. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X
Comments to Sections T(1), (2), (3) and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associate with wildfires as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect wildfires.

Potential wildfire impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

U. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Less than
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Incorporated

1. Does the project have the potential to substantial
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
X

2. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.)

3. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
Comments to Sections U(1), (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan for the FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to degrade biological resources or the overall quality of the natural environment; eliminate important historic or prehistoric resources; have environmental effects causing substantial adverse effects on humans; or have cumulatively considerable impacts. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs are not considered cumulatively considerable.

Potential cumulative impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 18
103 of 155

APRIL 2023

13. Earlier Analyses
None

14. Project References Used to Prepare Initial Study Checklist One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and are available for review in the Planning Division Office, 633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103, Glendale, CA 91206- 4386. Items used are referred to by number on the Initial Study Checklist.

1. Proposed Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Development and Housing Department for the fiscal year 2023-2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and HOME programs.

2. The City of Glendale’s General Plan, “Open Space and Conservation Element,” as amended.

3. California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Los Angeles County Important Farmland 2010 (September 2011).

4. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42 (Revised 1997, Supplements 1 and 2 added 1999).

5. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning (May 2005).

6. City of Glendale, General Plan, “Safety Element” (2003).

7. California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State of California General Plan Guidelines (2017).

8. City of Glendale Municipal Code, as amended.

FY 2023-2024 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 19
104 of 155

105 of 155

106 of 155

107 of 155

108 of 155

109 of 155

110 of 155

111 of 155

112 of 155

113 of 155

114 of 155

115 of 155

116 of 155

117 of 155

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
• • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontracts, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Door of Hope 669 N. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA 91101 Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson 669 N. Los Robles Ave. Pasadena
Pasadena
Pasadena
Pasadena
Pasadena
CA
CA
CA
CA
91101
Megan Katerjian
Griffin Hatlestad
Audrey Lee
Chief Executive Officer / President 669 N. Los Robles Ave. 91101 91101
91101
91101
669 N. Los Robles Ave.
669 N. Los Robles Ave.
669 N. Los Robles Ave.

Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of DirectorsRobert Lagace (Board Pres.)
N/A
CA
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 118 of 155

Subcontractor(s)**:

Full Name
Name Address
CityTitle Business Address State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

N/ACampaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named X Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:

I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 2In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages. , at:
221 E. Walnut St. #112 Pasadena
Executed on:

Signature:

Address:
, 20 , California.March 22 23
Griffin HatlestadPrint Full Name:
221 E. Walnut St. #112 Pasadena, CA 91101
[email protected]
E-mail Address:

Phone Number: (626)304-9130 x117
Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc 119 of 155

120 of 155

121 of 155

122 of 155

123 of 155

124 of 155

City of Glendale

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, Inc., Social Services 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202 Full Name
Vicky Marachelian
Title
Chairperson
Business Address
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

City
Glendale
State Zip
91202CA
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating OfficerTalar Aintablian, Director of Operations 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 Ruzanna Mkrtchyan, Financial Controller Chief Financial Officer Maral Manokian, Secretary (full list attached) Board of Directors 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

Glendale
Glendale
CA
CA
91202
91202
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 125 of 155

Subcontractor(s)**: N/A
Full Name
Name Address
CityTitle Business Address State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

N/ACampaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named x Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:

I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 3In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages. , at: GlendaleExecuted on:

Signature:

Address:

March 22 , 2023 , California.

Talar AintablianPrint Full Name:
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202
(818) 241-7533 ext. 101 [email protected] Number: E-mail Address:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc 126 of 155

ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY
OF WESTERN USA, INC.

SOCIAL SERVICES
ՀԱՅ ՕԳՆՈՒԹԵԱՆ ՄԻՈՒԹԵԱՆ
ԱՐԵՒՄՏԵԱՆ ՄԻԱՑԵԱԼ ՆԱՀԱՆԳՆԵՐՈՒ
ԸՆԿԵՐԱՅԻՆ ԾԱՌԱՅՈՒԹԵԱՆ ԳՐԱՍԵՆԵԱԿ
ARS Regional Executive Board
2022-2024
• Vicky Marachelian, Chairperson
• Zharmen Mirzakhanyan, Vice-Chairperson
• Maral Kouyoumdjian Manokian, Secretary
• Christina Khanjian, Treasurer
• Haigo Barsamian, Advisor
• Anush Chalian, Advisor
• Emma Garabetian, Advisor
• Seda Khojayan, Advisor
• Shoushan Tashjian, Advisor
127 of 155

128 of 155

129 of 155

City of Glendale

Contractor(s)*:

Name
Verdugo Hills Council, Boy Scouts of America
Address
1325 Grandview Avenue, Glendale, CA 91201
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Andrew Sisolak Chief Executive Officer / President 1325 Grandview Avenue, Glendale, CA 91201 Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Peter Ciulla Board of Directors 1242 Palmetto Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013 More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 130 of 155

Subcontractor(s)**:

Not Applicable
Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

March 27 23 Simi Valley
Executed on:

Signature:
, 20 , at: , California.

Andrew SisolakPrint Full Name:

Address: 1325 Grandview Avenue, Glendale, CA 91201
Phone Number: (805) 405-7874 [email protected] Address:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc 131 of 155

132 of 155

133 of 155

134 of 155

135 of 155

City of Glendale

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
CityFull Name Title Business Address State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 136 of 155

Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Glendale Youth Alliance 1255 S. Central Avenue, Glendale CA 91204 Full Name Title
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Business Address
1255 S. Central Ave.
1255 S. Central Ave.

City State
CA
CA
Zip
91204
91204
Dr. Vahe Peroomian Glendale
GlendaleKarine Grigoryan
Ani Keshishian 1255 S. Central Ave. Glendale 91204CA
Please see attached
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by: N/A
Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
xOn behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:

I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is 3 pages. , 2023 , at: Glenadale
Print Full Name:

Marc 27Executed on:

Signature:
, California.

Karine Grigoryan
Address: 1255 S. Central Avenue , Glendale CA, 91204
Phone Number: 818-548-2790 E-mail Address: [email protected] Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc 137 of 155

GYA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Executive Board
Address: 1255 S. Central Ave.,
Glendale CA 91204
Dr. Vahe Peroomian, Chair
Professor –USC
David Ellis, Vice Chair
Ellis Family Stores
Ani Keshishian, Treasurer
PDC of GCC
Brielle Acevedo, Secretary
Citi Community Capital
Dr. Armina Gharpetian, Past Chair
GUSD Board of Education
Board of Directors
Shant Sahakian
GUSD Board of Education
Christopher Anwary
LA County Lusine Yarian
Glendale Police Department
Aylin Isayan
City of Glendale Honorary Board Member
Adrin Nazarian
State AssemblymemberDr. Ilin Magran
GUSD
Rob Mikitarian
Glendale Adult Health Day Care
Narine Petrosyan
Pogosian Tax Planning Inc.

Lt. Rafael Quintero
Glendale Police Department
Art Resendez
California Trust Bank
138 of 155

EXHIBIT 7
Funding Decisions by Glendale Continuum of Care Board
Thursday, March 9, 2023
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Fiscal Year 2023-2025 Funding Competition Awarded to Glendale Continuum of Care (CA-612)
Organization Project
Street Outreach
and/or
Emergency Shelter
Homelessness Prevention
and/or
Rapid Rehousing Administration Total
Subrecipients
Ascencia Emergency Housing Program $32,000 n/a $1,703 $33,703 $148,804Catholic Charities of Los Angeles (CCLA) Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program n/a $35,533 $1,703 $37,236 Home Again LA ESG Rapid Rehousing for Unsheltered Families n/a $51,365 n/a $51,365 YWCA of Glendale & Pasadena Sunrise Village Emergency Shelter $26,500 n/a n/a $26,500 Recipient City of Glendale ESG Administration n/a n/a $3,403 $3,403 $3,403 Total: $58,500 $86,898 $6,809 $152,207 $152,207
% of Total: 38% 57% 4% 100%
Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Remaining Round 2 Funds Awarded to Glendale Continuum of Care (CA-612)
Organization Total
Ascencia $11,250
YWCA of Glendale & Pasadena $38,750
Total: $50,000
139 of 155

Exhibit 8
PROJECT/SPONSOR 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 TOTAL 1 All for Health, Health for All 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 2 Adventist Health Glendale 54,000.00$ 104,605.00$ 65,000.00 $ 223,605.00$ 3 Armenian Bar Association 75,000.00$ 15,977.00 $ 90,977.00$ 4 Armenian Cultural Foundation 219,537.00$ 105,240.00 $ 151,299.00$ 476,076.00$ 5 Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America 10,299.00$ 10,299.00$ 6 Armenian Relief Society 96,678.00$ 52,500.00$ 50,500.00$ 55,500.00$ 54,250.00$ 61,309.00$ 57,500.00$ 285,000.00$ 50,299.00$ 50,977.00$ 814,513.00$ 7 Armenian General Benevolent Union 10,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 8 Ascensia 26,678.00$ 24,500.00$ 24,500.00$ 74,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 8,299.00 $ 52,817.00$ 261,294.00$ 9 Boy Scouts of America 22,000.00$ 10,299.00$ 32,299.00$ 10The Campbell Center 10,000.00$ 100,131.00 $ 197,858.00$ 377,883.50$ 685,872.50$ 11Catholic Charities 36,678.00$ 35,500.00$ 33,500.00$ 129,400.00$ 32,250.00$ 46,486.00$ 284,800.00$ 332,469.00$ 41,409.00$ 25,977.00$ 998,469.00$ 12Childrens Burn Foundation 33,500.00$ 15,000.00 $ 10,299.00$ 58,799.00$ 13Committee for Armenian Students in Public Schools10,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 26,000.00$ 38,000.00$ 38,000.00$ 48,085.00$ 48,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 30,299.00$ 30,977.00$ 332,361.00$ 14Door of Hope 131,676.00$ 140,000.00$ 168,931.00$ 109,680.00$ 20,000.00$ 19,000.00 $ 78,880.00$ 20,299.00$ 25,977.00$ 714,443.00$ 15Home Again Los Angeles 11,000.00$ 128,250.00$ 10,299.00$ 10,977.00$ 160,526.00$ 16Glendale Adventist Medical Center 50,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 104,605.00$ 65,000.00 $ 273,605.00$ 17Glendale Collage Foundation 90,000.00$ 10,299.00$ 100,299.00$ 18Glendale YMCA 50,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 334,495.00 $ 179,000.00$ 638,495.00$ 19Glendale Youth Alliance 47,678.00$ 50,500.00$ 47,500.00$ 54,253.00$ 46,000.00$ 50,500.00$ 37,000.00$ 97,000.00$ 25,299.00$ 20,977.00$ 476,707.00$ 20Glendale YWCA 248,800.00$ 224,413.00$ 120,000.00 $ 403,860.50 $ 997,073.50$ 21Hamazkayin Armenian and Cultural Society 11,500.00$ 33,000.00$ 15,299.00$ 59,799.00$ 22Homenetmen 97,678.00$ 96,000.00$ 160,069.00$ 136,420.00$ 185,722.00$ 144,880.00$ 167,251.00$ 193,270.00$ 206,518.00$ 1,387,808.00$ 23Housing Rights Center 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 11,500.00$ 11,500.00$ 11,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,299.00$ 10,000.00$ 101,799.00$ 24The Salvation Army 11,678.00$ 11,000.00$ 13,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 28,397.00$ 115,643.00$ 20,977.00 $ 261,695.00$ CDBG-Ten Year Table of Funding History
140 of 155

Exhibit 8
$15,000.00 $223,605.00 $90,977.00 $476,076.00 $10,299.00 $814,513.00 $80,000.00 $261,294.00 $32,299.00 $685,872.50 $998,469.00 $58,799.00 $332,361.00 $714,443.00 $160,526.00 $273,605.00 $100,299.00 $638,495.00 $476,707.00 $997,073.50 $59,799.00 $1,387,808.00
$101,799.00 $261,695.00 All for Health,Health for AllAdventistHealthGlendaleArmenian BarAssociationArmenianCulturalFoundationArmenianEngineers andScientists ofAmericaArmenianRelief SocietyArmenianGeneralBenevolentUnionAscensia Boy Scouts ofAmericaThe CampbellCenterCatholicCharitiesChildrensBurnFoundationCommitteefor ArmenianStudents inPublic SchoolsDoor of Hope Home AgainLos AngelesGlendaleAdventistMedicalCenterGlendaleCollageFoundationGlendaleYMCAGlendaleYouthAllianceGlendaleYWCAHamazkayinArmenian andCulturalSocietyHomenetmen HousingRights CenterThe SalvationArmy Non-Profits
141 of 155

3 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Appropriation of $3,697,671 in Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Funding for a Portion of the Acquisition Costs for 426 Piedmont Avenue, and for Administrative Costs.

1. City Council Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $3,697,671 for a Portion of the Acquisition Costs for 426 Piedmont Avenue, and for Administrative Costs.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 6, 2023 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On November 15, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing submittal of a PLHA application and PLHA plan to the State of California. As an entitlement jurisdiction under the PLHA program, the City was allocated funding on a non-competitive basis in the amount of $3,697,671 for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021. The City expects to receive an estimated $1,504,479 for the years 2022 and 2023.

With City Council’s approval, staff submitted a plan to utilize PLHA funding allocations from 2019-2023 towards the acquisition and development of a multifamily affordable housing development for seniors at 426 Piedmont.

On April 11, 2023, the City received an award letter from the State of California, approving its application and 5-year plan. The intent of this item is to request Council’s approval for appropriation of the funding, consistent with the approved 5-year plan.

COUNCIL PRIORITIES
Housing: Approving the allocation of PLHA funding will enable the Glendale City Council and Glendale Housing Authority to address the demand for affordable housing. 142 of 155

23 4
2 8
6 RECOMMENDATION
That City Council approve a Resolution of Appropriation in the amount of $3,697,671 for a portion of the acquisition costs of 426 Piedmont Avenue including administrative costs.

BACKGROUND
In 2017, Governor Jerry Brown signed a 15-bill housing package aimed at addressing the state’s housing shortage and high housing costs. Specifically, it included the Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB 2), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable homes in California.

SB 2 created a dedicated revenue source for affordable housing and directed the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to make available 70 percent of the funds in the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund, collected on and after January 1, 2019, to local governments for eligible activities aimed at increasing affordable housing. These funds are provided through the PLHA Program.

PLHA funds are allocated to the City of Glendale noncompetitively based on the formula used under Federal law to allocate CDBG funds within California.

To receive PLHA funding, the City of Glendale was required to submit an application and 5-year plan for the use of funding for the following program years:
2019 - $867,025
2020 - $1,347,626
2021 - $1,483,020
2022-2023 - $1,504,479 (estimated)
TOTAL: $5,202,150
With Council’s approval, the City applied to use 95% of the funds toward the acquisition and development of a recently acquired site – 426 Piedmont Avenue, and 5% toward administrative costs. The site will be developed into 58-67 units of affordable housing for very low and low-income seniors.

On April 11, 2023, the state accepted the City’s PLHA application and 5-year plan and issued an award letter for the first three years of funding, totaling $3,697,671.

ANALYSIS
Based on the award letter received from the State for the first three years of PLHA funding, staff will create a new fund that will account for monies received and expended by the City under the PLHA program. The fund will receive an annual allocation from the State, with the next allocation estimated to be $1,504,479 for program years 2022 and 2023.
143 of 155

33 4
2 8
6 The fund’s first allocation totals $3,697,671. Per the City’s approved 5-Year PLHA plan, $3,512,787 (95%) will be allocated toward the acquisition of 426 Piedmont. $184,884 (5%) will be allocated for administrative costs
426 Piedmont Avenue was acquired for $11.9M in September 2022. At the time, PLHA funding was not yet made available to the City. Staff anticipated receiving a PLHA funding award letter in February of 2023.

In order to acquire the site, in August 2022, staff recommended the use of $5,780,000 from the City’s Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF) toward the purchase. Now that PLHA funding has been made available to the City, staff recommends allocating $3,512,787 in PLHA funding to cover a portion of acquisition cost previously allocated from the LMIHAF fund, as the LMIHAF fund no longer receives annual allocations due to the dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies in 2012. Based on the approved 5-year PLHA Plan, the anticipated 2022-2023 allocations will also be used toward the development of 426 Piedmont, and toward administrative costs.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
A Public Notice was published in the Glendale News Press on Saturday, November 5, 2022, notifying interested parties of the 5-year plan for use of PLHA Funding. The Plan was posted on Community Development Department’s website and was available at City Hall for viewing from November 4, 2022 – November 14, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
The PLHA award of $3,697,671, for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 was not included as a part of the FY 2022-23 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $3,697,671 from grant revenue, of which $3,512,787 will be used to cover a portion of the acquisition cost for 426 Piedmont Avenue and $184,884 will be used for administrative costs. A new fund was created to receive and expend the annual allocation of PLHA funds the City expects to receive from the State. Following is an outline of the appropriation request, consistent with the City’s PLHA 5-Year Plan:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$3,512,787 GL: 32610-2280-
CDD-0020-P0000-
GL: 51100-2280-
CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00914CG
Permanent Local
Housing Allocation
Fund
$184,884 GL: 32610-2280-
CDD-0020-P0000-
GL: 41100-2280-
CDD-0020-P0000-
PL: CDD00998AG
Permanent Local
Housing Allocation
Fund
144 of 155

43 4
2 8
6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Approve the Resolution of Appropriation for $3,697,671.

Alternative 2: Do not approve Resolution of Appropriation for $3,697,671.

Alternative 3: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Prepared by:

Peter Zovak, Assistant Director of Community Development Michael Fortney, Principal Housing Project Manager
Pamela Jackson, Housing Coordinator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Resolution of Appropriation
Exhibit 2: Permanent Local Housing Allocation
Award Letter
Exhibit 3: PLHA Application and Allocation Plan
145 of 155

146 of 155

147 of 155

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 670, 95833
P. O. Box 952054
Sacramento, CA 94252-2054
(916) 263-2771
www.hcd.ca.gov
April 11, 2023
Roubik Golanian, City Manager
City of Glendale
613 East Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206
Dear Roubik Golanian:

RE: Award Announcement – Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program Round 3, Notice of Funding Availability, Fiscal Year 2022/2023 City of Glendale
Contract No. 22-PLHA-17779
The California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is pleased to announce that the City of Glendale has been awarded a Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program award in the amount of $3,697,671. This letter constitutes notice of the designation of PLHA program funds for use in Los Angeles County for the following activities:
 New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing
 Five Percent (5%) Administrative Costs
The City of Glendale will be required to enter into a Standard Agreement that will set forth conditions for funding and milestones that are required to be met. Reimbursement of eligible expenses are subject to the terms outlined in Section 304(d) of the PLHA adopted program guidelines.

Congratulations on your successful application. For further information, please contact Doniell Cummings, PLHA Program Manager, Program Design and Implementation Branch, at (916) 695-9006 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Jennifer Seeger
Deputy Director
Division of State Financial Assistance
148 of 155

Final Filing Date: October 31, 2022
at 4:00 P.M. PST
Permanent Local Housing Allocation
(PLHA) Formula Allocation
2022 Application for New Applicants
State of California
Governor, Gavin Newsom
Lourdes Castro Ramírez, Secretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Gustavo Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development
Program Design and Implementation, PLHA Program
2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 150, Sacramento, CA 95833 PLHA Program Email: [email protected]
149 of 155

Threshold items are indicated in "blue" cells.

Applicant must complete the following worksheets in the PLHA Formula Allocation Application.

Formula Allocation Application
"Red" shaded cells indicate the Sponsor has failed to meet a requirement of the program.

Application and Adopting the
PLHA Plan (2019-2023
Allocations) Reso
Electronic File Name
App1 TIN
Pursuant to section 302(c)(4) of the Guidelines, Applicant’s PLHA Plan for 2019-2023 allocations is attached to this resolution, and Applicant certifies compliance with all public notice, comment, and hearing requirements in accordance with the Guidelines.

Document Description
302(c)(4) Plan
Legislative Contacts
Applications must be on the Department’s forms and cannot be altered or modified by the Applicant. Excel forms must be in Excel format and 'save as' .xls or .xlsx. Do not 'save as' .xlsm or .pdf format. If you encounter problems with the application, please fill out the Application Support worksheet and email the entire workbook to Application Support at [email protected] and [email protected]
General Instructions Additional instructions and guidance are given throughout the Formula Allocation Application in "red" text and in cell comments.

Guideline references are made with "§" and the corresponding guideline section number. "Yellow" cells are for Applicant input. Failure to provide the required attachments and documentation will disqualify your application from consideration.

Required attachments are indicated in "orange" throughout the Supplemental Application. Failure to provide the required attachments and documentation may disqualify your application from consideration. Electronically attached files must use the naming convention in the PLHA Application. For Example: "App1 Payee Data" for Applicant 1 Payee Data Record/STD. 204.

Instructions
This application form is limited to Applicants who did not apply to the 2020 and 2021 Formula Allocation NOFA
Rev. 2/16/22
When opening this file, a yellow banner at the top may appear with a button that says "Enable Content". It is essential that you click this box so that the macros are enabled.

Enabling macros is necessary for full worksheet functionality. Macros do not work with Microsoft's Excel version for Apple Mac.

Applications must be submitted electronically to the Department’s website. Requirements for uploading the Application Workbook and required supporting documentation, including naming conventions, are described in the application instructions available at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-funding/active-funding/plha.shtml. All applicable information must be received by HCD no later than 4:00 p.m. on:

Monday, October 31, 2022
Disclosure of Application (California Public Records Act Statutes of 1968 Chapter 1473): Information provided in the application will become a public record available for review by the public, pursuant to the California Public Records Act Statutes of 1968 Chapter 1473. As such, any materials provided will be disclosable to any person making a request under this Act. The Department cautions Applicants to use discretion in providing information not specifically requested, including but not limited to, bank accounts, personal phone numbers and home addresses. By providing this information to the Department, the Applicant is waiving any claim of confidentiality and consents to the disclosure of submitted material upon request.

Included?
Included
N/A
X Reuse Plan
X Applicant Delegation
Agreement
0 X Executed Application Provide a copy of the signed application. Signature in blue ink preferred. Included Legally binding agreement between Delegating and Administering Local Governments (sample provided—just click on icon in row 17, column AI)
Program Income Reuse Plan describing how repaid loans or accrued interest will be used for eligible activities in Section 301.

Included
Checklist
Included
Threshold
Requirement
X
PLHA Page 1 Instructions & Checklist
150 of 155

Local Government Formula Allocation for New Applicants Rev. 2/16/22 613 East Broadway
§301(a)(2) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable rental and ownership housing, including Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), that meets the needs of a growing workforce earning up to 120 percent of AMI, or 150 percent of AMI in high-cost areas. ADUs shall be available for occupancy for a term of no less than 30 days.
§301(a)(1) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is affordable to Extremely low-,Very low-, Low-, or Moderate-income households, including necessary operating subsidies. §301(a)(7) Accessibility modifications in Lower-income Owner-occupied housing. §301(a)(6) Assisting persons who are experiencing or At-risk of homelessness, including, but not limited to, providing rapid re-housing, rental assistance, supportive/case management services that allow people to obtain and retain housing, operating and capital costs for navigation centers and emergency shelters, and the new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of permanent and transitional housing. §301(a)(5) Capitalized Reserves for services connected to the preservation and creation of new permanent supportive housing. §301(a)(4) Matching portions of funds available through the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund pursuant to subdivision (d) of HSC Section 34176.

Instructions: If the Local Government Recipient of the PLHA Formula Allocation delegated its PLHA formula allocation to a Local Housing Trust Fund or to another Local Government, the Applicant (for which information is required below) is the Local Housing Trust Fund or administering Local Government. The PLHA award will be made to the Applicant (upon meeting threshold requirements) and the Applicant is responsible for meeting all program requirements throughout the term of the Standard Agreement.

The 302(c)(4) Plan template worksheet requires first choosing one or more of the Eligible Activities listed below. If "Yes" is clicked, the 302(c)(4) Plan worksheet opens a series of questions about what precise activities are planned. Some specific activities, such as providing downpayment assistance to lower-income households for acquisition of an affordable home, could be included under either Activity 2 or 9. Please only choose one of those Activities; don't list the downpayment assistance under both Activities.

If the PLHA funds are used for the same Activity but for different Area Median Income (AMI) level, select the same Activity twice (or more times) and the different AMI level the Activity will serve. Please enter the percentage of funds allocated to the Activity in only the first Activity listing to avoid double counting the funding allocation.

For each year (2019-2023), allocations must equal 100% annually including the allowable administrative costs of up to 5%. 2021 PLHA NOFA Formula Allocation Amount: $1,347,626 2021 NOFA Allowable Local Admin (5%): $67,381 Uploaded to HCD?
§300(d) Is Applicant delegated by another Local government to administer on its behalf its formula allocation of program funds? CA
§302(c)(3) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that, if the Local Government proposes allocation of funds for any activity to another entity, the Local government’s selection process had no conflicts of interest and was accessible to the public. §302(c)(2) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that submission of the applicati on was authorized by the governing board of the Applicant.

Eligible Activities, §301
Title:
91206
Yes
§302(a) The Applicant's Housing Element and Delegating Local Government's Housing Element (if applicable) was/were adopted by the Local Government’s governing body by the application submittal date subsequently determined to be in substantial compliance with state Housing Element Law pursuant to Government Code Section 65585.

Yes
§301(a)(3) Matching portions of funds placed into Local or Regional Housing Trust Funds.

State: CA
Address:

Pamela Jackson
City Manager
613 East Broadway
Yes
Threshold Requirements, §302
§302(b) Applicant or Delegating Local Government has submitted the current or prior year's Annual Progress Report to the Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to Government Code Section 65400. Yes §300(d) If Applicant answered "Yes" above, has the Applicant attached the legally binding agreement required by §300 (c) and (d)? A sample agreement can be
found by double clicking on
the icon to the right
§302(c)(5) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that the Plan submitted is for a term of five years (2019-2023). Local Governments agree to inform the Department of changes made to the Plan in each succeeding year of the term of the Plan. Yes §302(c)(6) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that it will ensure compliance with §302(c)(6) if funds are used for the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of for-sale housing projects or units within for-sale housing projects.

Yes
Yes
Administration
§302(c)(4)(D) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that the Plan was authorized and adopted by resolution by the Local Government and that the public had an adequate opportunity to review and comment on its content. §302(c)(7) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that it will ensure that the PLHA assistance is in the form of a low-interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the Project, if funds are used for the development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development. The loan shall be evidenced through a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust and a Regulatory Agreement shall restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with the Local government-approved underwriting of the Project for a term of at least 55 years.

Yes
File Name: Reuse Plan Program Income Reuse Plan describing how repaid loans or accrued interest will be used for eligible activities in Section 301.

Narrative uploaded
to HCD? Yes
§302(c)(8) Has Applicant attached a program income reuse plan describing how repaid loans or accrued interest will be reused for eligible activities specified in Section 301? Yes
§302(c)(4) Applicant certified in the Resolution submitted with this application that the application include a Plan in accordance with §302(c)(4)? YesApplicant agrees to adhere to §501, Audits/Monitoring of Project Files.

YesApplicant agrees to adhere to §500, Accounting Records.

Applicant Delegation Agreement Legally binding agreement between Delegating and Administering Local Governments (sample provided—just click on icon in row 17, column AI) Yes
Yes
§301(a)(10) Fiscal incentives made by a county to a city within the county to incentivize approval of one or more affordable housing Projects, or matching funds invested by a county in an affordable housing development Project in a city within the county, provided that the city has made an equal or greater investment in the Project. The county fiscal incentives shall be in the form of a grant or low-interest loan to an affordable housing Project. Matching funds investments by both the county and the city also shall be a grant or low-interest deferred loan to the affordable housing Project. §301(a)(9) Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance. §301(a)(8) Efforts to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed or vacant homes and apartments.

N/A
File Name:

Pursuant to section 302(c)(4) of the Guidelines, Applicant’s PLHA Plan for 2019-2023 allocations is attached to this resolution, and Applicant certifies compliance with all public notice, comment, and hearing requirements in accordance with the Guidelines.

No
App1 TIN
Application and Adopting the PLHA
Plan (2019-2023 Allocations) Reso
Included?§301(a) Eligible activities are limited to the following:

File Name:

Uploaded to HCD? N/A
Uploaded to
HCD?
Yes
File Name:

Contact Phone:

Glendale State:
$867,025 2020 NOFA Allowable Local Admin (5%): $43,351
Eligible Applicants §300
§300(a) and (b) Eligible Applicants for the Entitlement and Non-Entitlement formula component described in Section §100(b)(1) and (2) are limited to the metropolitan cities and urban counties allocated a grant for the federal fiscal year 2017 pursuant to the federal CDBG formula specified in 42 USC, Section §5306 and Non-entitlement local governments.

Applicant: City of Glendale
County:
818-548-3705
91206
Auth Rep Name: Roubik Golanian
City: Glendale CA Zip:

Zip Code:
2022 PLHA NOFA Formula Allocation Amount: $1,483,020 2022 NOFA Allowable Local Admin (5%): $74,151 Eligible Applicant Type: Entitlement.

Local Government Recipient of PLHA Formula Allocation: Glendale 2020 PLHA NOFA Formula Allocation Amount:

Zip Code:
818-548-4844
Contact Name:

City:

Phone:

Address:

Address:
141 North Glendale Avenue, Suite 202
Contact Email: [email protected]
City:
91206 Los AngelesState:

Glendale
[email protected] Rep. Email:

Title: Housing Coordinator
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
SAMPLE -Legally
Binding Agreement
PLHA Page 1 Formula Allocation Application
151 of 155

Signature Date
Certifications
Applicant agrees to adhere to §503, Reporting. Yes
Applicant agrees to adhere to §502, Cancellation/Termination.

Roubik Golanian
Authorized Representative Printed Name
City Manager
Title
Yes
On behalf of the entity identified below, I certify that: The information, statements and attachments included in this application are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct and I possess the legal authority to submit this application on behalf of the entity identified in the signature block.

PLHA Page 2 Formula Allocation Application
152 of 155

§302(c)(4)(C) Provide a description of how the Plan is consistent with the programs set forth in the Local Government’s Housing Element.

This Plan is consistent with the following programs identified in the City's Housing Element which outline housing goals and policies:
1) Goal 3: A City with Increased Opportunities for Affordable Housing - Encourage the private development of affordable housing, as well as senior housing; 2) Program Strategy #2- Production of Affordable Housing, 2a. Density Bonus Program: Utilize density bonus incentives to encourage the development of affordable family housing as well as senior housing; and 3) Policy 4.4: Amend the Zoning Ordinance as appropriate to facilitate the development for special needs groups and individuals, such as locating housing and special populations near appropriate services. §301(a)(1) The predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily, residential live-work, rental housing that is affordable to extremely low-,very low-, low-, or moderate- income households, including necessary Operating subsidies. §302(c)(4)(E)(i) Provide a detailed and complete description of how allocated funds will be used for each proposed Affordable Rental Housing Activity. §302(c)(4) Plan Rev. 2/16/22
§302(c)(4)(A) Describe the manner in which allocated funds will be used for eligible activities.

The City of Glendale (City) will utilize their PLHA allocation funds to develop a multifamily rental building for senior households. §302(c)(4)(B) Provide a description of the way the Local government will prioritize investments that increase the supply of housing for households with incomes at or below 60 percent of Area Median Income (AMI).

The City will help finance this affordable rental community targeted to senior households earning between 30% and 80% of Area Median Income (AMI).

Activities Detail (Activities Detail (Must Make a Selection on Formula Allocation Application worksheet under Eligible Activities, §301)) The City will allocate 95% of their annual PLHA funds (for all five years) to the development of an approximately 60-unit senior rental community for households earning between 30% and 80% of AMI.

Funding Allocation Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Complete the table below for each proposed Affordable Rental Housing Activity to be funded with 2019-2023 PLHA allocations. If a single Activity will be assisting households at more than one level of Area Median Income, please list the Activity as many times as needed to capture all of the AMI levels that will be assisted, but only show the percentage of annual funding allocated to the Activity one time (to avoid double counting).
60 §302(c)(4)(E)(iii) A description of major steps/actions and a proposed schedule for the implementation and completion of the Activity. §302(c)(4)(E)(i) Percentage of
Funds Allocated for the Proposed
Affordable Rental Housing
Activity

95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0%
§302(c)(4)(E)(ii) Area Median
Income Level Served 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%
150 n/a n/a
TOTAL
450
§302(c)(4)(E)(ii) Unmet share of
the RHNA at the AMI Level
Note: complete for years 2019,
2020, 2021 only
55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years
§302(c)(4)(E)(iv) Period of
Affordability for the Proposed
Affordable Rental Housing
Activity (55 years required for
rental housing projects)
55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years 55 Years §302(c)(4)(E)(ii) Projected
Number of Households Served 0 0 0 0 60
150 150
PLHA Page 1 302(c)(4) Plan
of

The proposed timeline for development of the proposed senior rental community: 1. City acquire the site (complete);

2. City publish RFP for affordable housing developers (Q1 2023);

3. City execute DDA with developer (Q2 2023); 4. Predevelopment phase (2023 and 2024); and 5. Construction phase (2024/2025).

PLHA Page 2 302(c)(4) Plan
154 of 155

25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 Justification:

Issue # Program
Name & Tab Section Cell# Update/Comment Urgency ADT Status Status Date Organization: Email: Contact Phone:

Application Development Team (ADT) Support Form Rev. 2/16/22 Please complete the "yellow" cells in the form below and email a copy to: [email protected]. and [email protected]. A member of the Application Development Team will respond to your request within ASAP.

Full Name: Date Requested: Application
Version Date:

PLHA Page 1 Application Support
155 of 155

Glendale City CouncilJune 6, 2023

Glendale City Council
June 6, 2023