Glendale City Council
November 7, 2023

EXHIBIT 1

CITY OF GLENDALE

PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING

APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT
Date:

Encroachment Permit No.

Receipt No. of Non-Refundable Permit Fee:

Applicant:

Address:

Phone:

Location of Encroachment ____ ____________________________________________ Name and Address of owner of adjacent real property benefited by the encroachment:

Legal Description of adjacent real property:

Applicant shall provide 1 electronic copy of plan of the proposed encroachment.

Specific description and justification for encroachment:

Applicant agrees to satisfy all conditions attached hereto and to remove said structure upon revocation of this permit at no cost to the City of Glendale.

Approved:

Date Yazdan T. Emrani, P. E.

Director of Public Works
Non-Refundable
Fee: $1903.00
Extenet Systems, LLC.
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
682-351-3335
Please see attached sheet for detailed scope of work.

This site will be a part of Verizon's 5G network.

Public Right of Way
01/31/2023
FRONT OF 1544 W KENNETH RD. (APN: 5622-027-018)
34° 10' 26.48" N 118° 16' 57.06" W
TRACT NO 4203 SE 55 FT OF NE 130 FT OF LOT 42
EP-823
Clerk
Rec
eipt Date
Receipt Time
Paid By:

Comment:

Receipt Number
City of Glendale, CA
Charge Code AmountDescription
Reference 1: Reference 2:

Reference 1: Reference 2:

Payment Method Reference AmountQuantity
Amount Tendered
Amount Applied
Change
Public Works Department
633 E. Broad
way
Room 209
Glendale, CA 91206
818-548-3945
Receipt
Patino, Adrian
03/06/2023
03:21:43
Extenet, Inc.
(951)453-4194
278944

ENC Encroachment
EP 821-825 $9,515.00
CCFR10 Credit Card Fee Recovery $237.87
Credit Card
Extenet, Inc.
1 $9,515.00
Cc Fee
Extenet, Inc.
1 $237.87
$9,752.87
$9,752.87
$0.00

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA 633 E. Broadway, Suite 201 Public Works Department Glendale, CA 91206-4310
Administration Division Tel (818) 548-3945 Fax (818) 242-7087 www.glendaleca.gov

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY

ENCROACHMENT APPLICATION FORM

An applicant for placement of a wireless facility (WF) in the rights-of-way must obtain an encroachment permit from the City by submitting simultaneously, an application for an encroachment permit (as Item 17 to this form) and providing the other information as requested in this form.

You must use this form (latest version) and follow the Director’s Policy found at:

1. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/public-works/public-meetings-and-notices

2. Public Counter (633 E. Broadway Room 205, Glendale, CA 91206)

Questions about WFs should be directed to the City Public Works Department Engineering Division by calling (818) 548- 3945, however, any effective variance to the policy, requirements, and application guidelines can only be given by the Public Works Director in writing.

INITIAL SUBMISSION
WF applications may only be submitted at in-person appointments, which may be scheduled with the City’s Public Works Engineering department by calling (818) 548-3945. Submission appointments may be scheduled Monday-Tuesday 8 a.m. – 2 p.m. and Wed. – Thursday 8 a.m. – 12 p.m.

RESUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
If the City issues a notice of incompleteness, an applicant must timely resubmit a complete application. The City may exercise any rights available to it if a resubmittal is not timely or is itself incomplete, including rejecting the application. Resubmitt als shall be made in reply to the original assigned city staff member and to TLF ([email protected] ).

FORM OF SUBMISSIONS
Each WF site requires its own application.

Initial submissions shall be named in the following convention:
 [applicant name]-[numerical number]-[calendar year]
 Sample: XYZCompany-01-2022

Resubmissions shall be named in the following convention:
 [applicant name]-[numerical number]-[calendar year]-RESUB[#]  Sample: XYZCompany-01-2022-RESUB1
May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

Initial applications and resubmissions must be submitted in a n electronic format . The electronic form and all supporting documents must be in searchable PDF format and as individual documents (not a single PDF document/file). Each individual PDF document must be named to indicate the content of the file document. For example: ‘Attachment 1 - Photo Simulations’; ‘ Attachment 14 - RF Report’ ; ‘Attachment 19 - Acoustic Analysis’, etc. are acceptable file name formats.

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

Encroachment Permit No. ___________ [From Item 17 on Checklist] Date: __
____ Receipt No. _______
Non-Refundable Wireless Processing Fee:

App
licant: ____________________________________________________ Add
ress: _____________________________________________________ Pho
ne: _______________________________________________________ Sub
mission Name1:_____________________________________________ App
licant’s Identifier for Wireless Facility
Wir
eless Provider: _________________________________________ Coo
rdinates for Wireless Facility: ____________________________ Locati
on of Encroachment: _________________________________
Adj
acent Zone # and Description: ____________________________ Location Type: □ Preferred X Non-Preferred
1 Please see page 1 “Form of Submissions”.

Extenet Systems, LLC.
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
682-351-3335
Verizon Wireless
Public Right of Way
EP-823
01/31/2023
34° 10' 26.48" N 118° 16' 57.06" W
R1 I - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FAR DIST I
Extenet SCL Glendale 237-01-2023

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

APPLICATION CHECKLIST – REQUIRED MATERIALS
The applicant shall submit all of the applicable materials listed in this checklist , and in addition, to the extent not included in the list below, the information required by Glendale Municipal Code Sec. 12.08.037, esp. sections D and G.

APPLICATION FEE
1. SWF SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3. PROJECT PLANS
A. COVER SHEET
B. SITE SURVEY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
C. EQUIPMENT/INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY AND DETAILS
D. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
E. FIBER NETWORK PLAN
F. POWER NETWORK PLAN
4. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
A. CITY-OWNED PROPERTY
B. NON-CITY OWNED PROPERTY
5. SITE PHOTOS AND PHOTO SIMULATIONS
6. ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS
7. RF COMPLIANCE REPORT
8. FCC LICENSE
9. LATEST KMZ FILES
10. PLANNED NODE AND FIBER OPTIC INFRASTRUCTURE LIST
11. ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS
12. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
13. PUBLIC NOTICE
14. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
15. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE
16. CITY INDEMNIFICATION FORM
17. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FORM
18. CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY
19. CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (CPCN)

STAFF USE ONLY:

Application No. _________________________ City Receipt Date: ______________

Pole Number (if applicable): ____________________________________________

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

APPLICATION CHECKLIST DETAILS

APPLICATION FEE
Each Wireless Telecommunications Facility (WF) Application Form must be accompanied by the applicable application fees per the adopted City -Wide Fee Schedule. The application will not be deemed submitted unless the applicable fees, in full, have been received by the City.

As of May 2022, the required applicable fees are the construction - encroachment permit fee, and the wireless communication facility application processing fee; the City may require an additional fee for expert review. On July 1st of every year, the application fees may be updated to reflect the most recent adopted City-Wide Fee Schedule.

Additional fees will be required to be paid should the application be deemed incomplete after the first submission.

Additional permits and fees may be required. For example, most WF will require an excavation permit.

1. SMALL WIRELESS FACILITY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Label this as “Attachment 1 – SWF Supplemental Information”.

If applicant claims the facility is a small wireless facility, the applicant must complete and submit the information to support evaluation of whether the proposed facility qualifies as a Small Wireless Facility under 47 C.F.R. §

1.6002(l). If the facility is not a Small Wireless Facility, applicant should so state.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Label this as “Attachment 2 – Project Description.”
This section should demonstrate the intended technical service objectives and the nature of the existing service capabilities of the applicant’s network in the area that would be served by the proposed WF.

3. PROJECT PLANS
Label this as “Attachment 3 – Project Plans”.

Provide full-sized and 11”x17” digital project plans in portable document format (PDF) that contain all the following. Dimensions must be shown in decimal feet and volumes must be shown in decimal cubic feet. The Project Plans must be prepared, signed and stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer.

A. Cover Sheet

1. Contain detailed project description that specifies the proposed installation and/or modifications;
01/31/2023

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

2. Contain site information that includes the site address, assessor’s parcel number, site latitude and longitude, project team contact information, location map, and pole number (as applicable); B. Site Survey

1. Be prepared, signed and wet stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Surveyor;

2. Include the North Arrow, date, scale and legend on each plan page;

3. Show all areas in the public right of way to be occupied by the WF, including all power and fiber vaults and other equipment;

4. Show the actual property lines of all adjacent properties within 15 feet of any portion of the proposed project;

5. Include sidewalk measurements (in feet) to demonstrate full compliance of Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”) regulations (when making measurements, you must measure from the outside of the pole rather than from the centerline;

6. Depict all surrounding (within 15 feet) existing pedestrian ramps, posts, pedestals, traffic signals, sidewalk widths, fire hydrants, transit shelters, kiosks, ramps, driveways, curbs, and all other existing features in the PROW;

7. Show all traffic lanes;

8. Depict planters, vegetation, trees, and any other landscaped areas and features;

9. Depict all above and below-grade utilities, related structures, and encroachments;

10. Demonstrate how and why the proposed WF project will be in full compliance with all building codes, electrical codes and all other required codes in the PROW;
C. Site Development Plans

1. Be prepared, signed and wet stamped by a California Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Surveyor;

2. Include the North Arrow, date, scale and legend on each plan page;

3. Include all elevations of the proposed WF;

4. Show the actual property lines of all adjacent properties within 15 feet of any portion of the proposed project;

5. Include all existing and proposed improvements, structures, equipment, fixtures, concealment elements, and/or facilities with all dimensions, labels and ownership identifications clearly called out;

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

6. Depict all electrical, fiber and data backhaul connections (conduits, vaults, handholes, cables, wires, junctions, meters, meter-less power, etc.);

7. Depict all proposed antennas, associated equipment, pedestals, flush- to-grade vaults, concealment elements, conduits, risers and all conditions related to the proposed SWF;

8. Include all azimuth orientation of all proposed antennas.

D. Equipment/Infrastructure Inventory & Details

1. Contain cut sheets with all the technical specifications (manufacturer, model number, physical dimensions [height, width, length and weight]) of all the proposed antennas and associated equipment;

2. Include all dimensions shown in decimal feet (ft), and all volumes must be shown decimal cubic feet (ft
3);

3. Provide details and specifications of the proposed equipment to be installed.

4. Plans shall also include all infrastructure improvement details, including pole types, foundations, pull boxes, and conduits servicing the proposed infrastructure and any applicable details/cut sheets showing size and dimensioning as applicable.

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

E. Traffic Control Plans
Provide engineered traffic control plans that show the traffic control for the project. The plans must be drawn in accordance with the latest version of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices by a Registered California Civil Engineer or Traffic Engineer. The preparer’s stamp and signature must be shown on the plans.

F. Fiber & Power Network Plan
To the extent that the project requires running new fiber optic cables to the proposed node, the plans must include a street map view that shows all the proposed nodes in the deployment, clearly labeled with pole number and/or site ID, the hub or base station that serves the nodes in the deployment, all fiber optic cable routes that connect the nodes to the hub, and a legend that identifies any symbols, colors or other items on the map. The fiber plans should clearly identify all meet-me points and points of connection. Even if the fiber deployment will be performed by a third-party vendor, the applicant for wireless nodes must disclose all known or reasonably foreseeable fiber network elements.

The plans should include all underground utilities, all power conduit routes that connect the nodes and a legend that identifies any symbols, colors or other items on the map. The plans should clearly identify the location of the pedestal in addition to all points of connection, as well as the feed point/service spot for the power source. Applicant must show that it has met the requirements of Glendale Water and Power for electric service to the WF. Where new power will be run to a proposed node, this requirement can be satisfied by showing that the plans for electric service have been approved by Glendale Water and Power.

4. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
A. City-Owned Property
Label this as “Attachment 4 – City Owned Property LOA”.

If the applicant proposes to install a WF on any structure owned or controlled by the City and located within the public right-of-way, the applicant must contact Glendale Water and Power Electrical Engineering at (818) 548-3921.

Furthermore, the applicant must submit the following documents for review before receiving a City Owned Property LOA:
• Construction plans, including scope of work, vicinity map, site coordinates, site plan showing underground facilities, existing and proposed elevation, load calculations;
• Equipment specification sheets , including, but not limited to poles, foundations, pull boxes, meter sockets, load centers, radios, and antennas; • Structural calculations, stamped and signed by a registered engineer in the State of California; and,
• Photo of the existing pole, as applicable, and a rendering/simulation of the

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

existing/proposed pole with the new equipment.

B. Non-City Owned Property
Label this as “Attachment 4 – Non-City Owned Property LOA”.

If the applicant proposes to install a WF on a non-city owned structure, the applicant must submit a letter of authorization from the structure owner.

5. SITE PHOTOS AND PHOTO SIMULATIONS
Label this as “Attachment 5 – Site Photos and Photo Simulations”.

A. Site Photos

1. Provide original base color photos of proposed site, from three vantage points (Google street view or similar online photos are not acceptable);

2. Provide a key map detail showing each location where each photograph was taken, the proposed site and the direction to the site from each photo location;

3. The photos must be in a high-resolution format.

B. Photo Simulations
Provide photo simulations that would allow the City to visualize the proposed project as constructed. The photo simulations must be in a high-resolution format and show the proposed facility from reasonable line-of-sight locations that would accurately and reliably reflect the appearance of the proposed facility and/or modifications as-built.

1. Provide photo simulations using the base photos from the three vantage points. Each base photo and matching photo simulation must be the same size;

2. Depict the proposed facility accurately and reliably by visually representing all elements (cables, conduits, brackets, and electronic equipment such as antennas, radio units and powering equipment etc.) of the proposed facility and/or modifications as-built.

6. ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS
Label this as “Attachment 6 – Alternatives Site Analysis”.

Provide a detailed written analysis that describes how the proposed WF complies with all the requirements in the Wireless Municipal Code, which includes without limitation the location requirements, and all the alternative locations and designs considered before the applicant submitted this application.

The analysis must include all the following required information and/or materials:

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

A. an aerial map that shows the general geographic area of the proposed location annotated to show:

B. the search ring used for this particular project;
C. all locations for each alternative considered for this particular project (or if none, so state);
D. for each alternative site considered, a detailed written description that includes, without limitation all the following:

1. the physical address;

2. zoning district designation;

3. support structure type considered;

4. general design concept and concealment elements/techniques considered;

5. overall height and achievable antenna centerline height;

6. the factual reasons why the applicant considered the potential alternative site location and/or design to be unacceptable, infeasible, unavailable or not in accordance with the standards in the Wireless Municipal Code.

Note: This explanation must include a meaningful comparative analysis and such technical information and other factual justification as are necessary to document the reasons why each alternative is unacceptable, infeasible, unavailable or not as consistent with the standards in the Wireless Municipal Code. Conclusory statements that a particular alternative is unacceptable, infeasible, unavailable or not in accordance with the standards in the Wireless Municipal Code will be deemed incomplete;
Note: If
a less preferred WF location is proposed, the applicant must present fact-based, reliable evidence to support its selection of the less preferred WF location.

Also, for each alternative site within the search ring, signal propagation maps in scale with the street level map that show current and predicted service coverage in the area for all active frequencies in RSSI, RSRP or other relevant signal level or quality indicator with and without the alternative site and with a legend that describes the objective signal levels in dBm that correspond to any colors used to depict signal levels on such propagation maps. The signal propagation maps required must be directly comparable with the signal propagation maps submitted to show before-and-after service from the applicant’s proposed site. If the applicant did not locate any alternatives within the search ring, the analysis must expressly state that no such alternatives were considered.

7. RF COMPLIANCE REPORT
Label this as “Attachment 7 – RF Compliance Report”.

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

Provide an RF exposure compliance report prepared and certified by an RF engineer from a 3rd party, and not an employee of the service provider, that certifies that the WF, as well as any collocated facilities, will comply with applicable federal RF exposure standards and exposure limits.

The RF compliance report must include the actual frequency and power levels [in watts effective radiated power (“ERP”), not EIRP] for all existing and proposed antennas at the site; Also, the RF Compliance Report must depict:
 the location and orientation (degree azimuths from true north ) of all transmitting antennas;
 the boundaries of areas with RF exposures in excess of the uncontrolled/general population limit (as that term is defined by the FCC);  the boundaries of areas with RF exposures in excess of the controlled/occupational limit (as that term is defined by the FCC).  the outline of all structures on public or private land that are within 20 feet of the proposed WF site antennas

8. FCC LICENSE
Label this as “Attachment 8 – FCC License”.

Provide a copy of the FCC License of the operator of the facility.

9. LATEST KMZ FILES
Label this as “Attachment 9 – Latest KMZ Files”.

A map showing the location of the streetlight pole where a WF is desired to be located. This map should be in the form of a Google KMZ file.

10. PLANNED NODE AND FIBER OPTIC INFRASTRUCTURE LIST
Label this as “Attachment 10 – Planned Node and Fiber Optic Infrastructure List”.

A master list showing the location of all upcoming node and fiber optic infrastructure planned for the City of Glendale.

11. ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS
Label this as “Attachment 11 – Acoustic Analysis”.

Provide a report prepared and certified by an engineer (or other qualified personnel acceptable to the City) that measures all noise-emitting equipment related to the WF and would operate at the site. Such equipment includes without limitation all environmental control units, sump pumps, temporary backup power generators, and permanent backup power generators. The acoustic analysis must include an analysis of the manufacturers’ specifications for all noise- emitting equipment and a depiction of the proposed equipment relative to all adjacent property lines.

In lieu of a certified report, the applicant may submit evidence from the equipment manufacturer that the ambient noise emitted from all the proposed

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

equipment will not, both individually and cumulatively, exceed the applicable ambient noise limits. In addition, describe whether the equipment will be passively or actively cooled if any equipment will be enclosed in a shroud, cabinet, pedestal or other enclosure. If the equipment will be actively cooled, the applicant must include the manufacturer’s specifications for all active cooling mechanisms.

12. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Label this as “Attachment 12 – Structural Analysis”.

Provide a report prepared and certified by a structural engineer (or other qualified personnel acceptable to the City) that evaluates whether the underlying pole or support structure has the structural integrity to support all the proposed equipment and attachments. At a minimum, the analysis must be consistent with all applicable requirements in CPUC General Order 95 (including, but not limited to, load and pole overturning calculations), the National Electric Safety Code, and any safety and construction standards required by the utility.

13. PUBLIC NOTICE
Label this as “Attachment 13 – Public Notice”.

Per the City’s Wireless Facility Wireless Municipal Code, the applicant needs to carry out all necessary public noticing requirements including submitting mailing list and mailing labels for all properties and record owners of properties within 500 feet of the proposed WF location.

14. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Label this as “Attachment 14 – Certificates of Insurance”.

Provide proof of certificates of insurance.

15. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE
Label this as “Attachment 15 – City Business License”.

Provide proof of City Business License.

16. CITY INDEMNIFICATION FORM
Label this as “Attachment 16 – City Indemnification Form”.

17. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FORM
Label this as “Attachment 17 – Encroachment Permit Form”.

18. CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY
The undersigned certifies on behalf of itself, the applicant, and the owner of the property that the information provided in this form and its contents are true and complete to the best of the undersigned’s ability and knowledge, and the information provided here should be relied upon by the City as being accurate and complete when the City evaluates the WF proposal.

May 2022
City of Glendale WF Policy, Requirements, and Application Guidelines

_______________________ ______________________
Signature Title
_________
______________ ______________________
Individual Name Company Name
_________
______________
Date Signed

19. CERTI

FICATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY (CPCN)
The undersigned certifies on behalf of itself, the applicant, and the owner of the property that the information provided in this form and its contents are true and complete to the best of the undersigned’s ability and knowledge, and the information provided here should be relied upon by the City as being accurate and complete when the City evaluates the SWF proposal.
_________
______________ ______________________
Signature Title
_________
______________ ______________________
Individual Name Company Name
_________
______________
Date Signed
Alexander Novak
Site Acquisition
Teleworld Solutions
Joe Milone
Executive Director Government Relations
ExteNet Systems, LLC.
01/31/2023
01/31/2023

City
of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10
WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR WIRELESS PROJECTS
AND DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (“DAS”) PROJECTS
The City of Glendale, Californi a recognizes that the provision of wireless and DAS services are h
ighly technical enterprises s ubject to various federal, state, and local regulations. This supplemental application form is designed to elicit necessary and required technical information in support of a planned Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) or Special Use Permit (“SUP”) or Variance/Waver application for a new or modified wireless telecommunications site project or a Distributed Antenna System (“DAS”) project within the City of Glendale.

Completion of this supplemental application is a mandatory document for a wireless and DAS projects. This form assists the City of Glendale to comply with its duties under Title 30 of the Glendale Municipal Code; Secti ons 253 and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended; the FCC Shot Clock Order (F CC 09-99); California Public Utilities Code Sections 7901 and 7901.1; the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); the provisions of California Government Code Sections 6585 0.6 and 65964; and other local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and cour t rulings. The City of Glenda le requires that the applicant provide this information to assist it in creating a written administrative record containing substantial evidence sufficient to permit the City of Glendale’s informed consideration of your request, and to determine th e duties, rights and obligations of the City of Glendale and the applicant/owner of the proposed project.

No application for a new wireless site or for a modification of an existing wireless site shall be considered for determination of comple teness until all required responses to this supplemental application form and required Exhibits are completed and tendered to the City of Glendale.

Every page of this form including this page and the last page must be tendered to the City of
Glendale, California, and each question must be answered. If you do not believe that a specific item of information is necessary or applies to your application, mark the item on this form with the words, “Not Applicable” and at tach a detailed written explanation as to the basis for your belief (e.g., “Question 94.7 does not apply to this application because the proposed Project has no microwave transmission element.”) An unsupported statement such as “Question 94.7 does not apply” is insufficient as it is not informative as to your reasoning, and the determination of completeness of your application will be delayed while you provide a meaningful and detailed explanation.

Each page including this page and the last page must be initialed where indicated. The last page must also be completed, signed, an d dated. Please note that item numbers are intentionally non-sequential. Questions about this form or the information required by this form should be directed to th e City of Glendale’s Director of Community Development for public or private property projects , or to the Director of Public Works for projects in the public right-of-way.

AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

1.00: Project Location and Applicant Information

1.01:

1.02 1.03:

1.04:

1.08 1.10:

Project Physical Address (if any):

Project Site Number (if any)
Assessor’s Parcel Number:

Legal Name of Applicant
(Wireless Carrier or DAS Firm,
referred to in this form as the
“Project Owner”):

Project Owner is:

Applicant’s Representative is:

Name:

Title:

Firm Name:

Address 1:

Address 2:

City: State: Zip:

Main Tel: Ext:

Direct Tel:

Work Fax:

Mobile Tel:

Email Address:

Website:

1.14 Provide the City of Glendale Business License number for the Applicant or Applicant’s firm listed in 1.10: ____________________________

2.00: Project Owner Information and CPCN Information

2.03: Attach a letter of agency appointing the Applicant’s Representative as the agent for the Project Owner in connection with this application. Designate the letter of agency as “Exhibit 2.03.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 2.03 is attached hereto.

2.05: Attach a letter of agency appointing the Applicant’s Representative as the agent for the underlying Property Owner in connection with this application. Designate the letter of agency as “Exhibit 2.05.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 2.05 is attached hereto.

2.07: Does the Project Owner hold a Californi a Public Utilities Commission ‘Certificate of FRONT OF 1544 W KENNETH RD, Glendale, CA 91201
SCL Glendale 237
5622-027-018
ExteNet Systems, LLC
N/A as project is located in the Public Right-of-Way
Alexander Novak
Site Acquisition Agent
Teleworld Solutions
1054 Texan Tr, Ste. 300
Grapevine
TX
76051
682-351-3335
[email protected]
N/A - Not required for Extenet
AN
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

Public Convenience and Necessity’ (CPCN) for any service to be provided by this project? ___ Yes ___ No

2.08: If the answer to 2.07 is Yes, provide a tr ue and complete copy of the Project Owner’s CPCN and mark it as “Exhibit 2.07.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that the Exhibit 2.07 is attached hereto.

3.00: FCC License / FAA Compliance / RF Safety Disclosure Information

3.01: For each person/legal entity that will be using the project site, provide the information in Sections 3 and

4. If more than one person/legal entity, provide separate information for each person/legal entity using the project site.

Note to DAS provider applicants named in 1.04: Unless the DAS provider is the FCC licensee for the proposed project, or the non-licensee to be transmitted from the site for its own purposes, the information provided in response to Sections 3 and 4 must be provided by every individual wireless licensee or non-licensee to be transmitted via the project identified in Section 1 of this form. That information must be provided on the letterhead of each entity. Each such response must also be signed by an authorized person, and that person’s printed name and title, address and telephone number must be shown on the letter. DAS provider-provided responses to Section 4 are unacceptable, and will result in your application being determined to be incomplete.

3.02: For questions 3.03 through 3.09 inclusive, disclose all information for each proposed
Radio Frequency signal emitter (“RF Emitter”) at the project site.

3.03:

3.04:

3.05:

3.06:

3.07:

3.08:

3.09:

Name of RF Emitter:

RF Emitter’s Address Line 1:

RF Emitter’s Address Line 2:

RF Emitter’s Phone number:

RF Emitter’s Fax number:

RF Emitter’s Contact Email
address:

Use of facility:
(Check all that apply)

Notice: Applicants not operating
under their own FCC license(s)

__ Amateur Radio
__ Broadcast Radio
__ Broadcast TV
__ Cellular telephone
__ Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio
✔
AN
Verizon Wireless
15505 Sand Canyon Ave. Irvine, CA 92618
949-677-5953
[email protected]
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

3.10:

3.11:

3.12:

3.13:

3.14:
must mark “Other” and disclose
of all information required here
for all entities that use the project.

Project latitude and longitude:

Specify DATUM used above:

Project maximum height (ft AGL):

Bottom of lowest transmitting
antenna (ft AGL):

RF Emissions (“Rad”) center of
the lowest transmitting antenna
(ft AGL):
__ Microwave
__ PCS telephone
__ Paging
__ SMR/ESMR
__ WiMax/WIFI
__ Other(s) (specify):____________________

N________________ W________________

__ WGS84 __NAD23 __NAD83
__Other DATUM (specify): _____________

3.15: For each licensee (i.e., “ABC Wireless” or “XYZ Wireless”), and for each radio
service (i.e., “PCS” or “Cellular”), complete and attach a separate two page “Appendix A” form from "A Local Government Official's Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety: Rules, Procedures, and Practical Guidance” available by download directly from the FCC at http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/ (the “Appendix A Form”). Ensure that all proposed emissions from this project are accounted for on the Appendix A Forms you submit.

Distributed Antenna System (DAS) providers and all other who are not licensed by the FCC for the radio services proposed for this project and identified in 3.09: Unless the DAS provider is the FCC licensee for the proposed project or the emissions from the site are solely for the DAS provider’s own transmissions, the DAS provider must provide an Appendix A form completed by each wireless carrier or wireless service provider to be transmitted through the Project at each wireless site. Appendix A Forms completed by a DAS provider are unacceptable if they are not the FCC licensee for the particular wireless service(s) to be transmitted through the project.

Designate all completed Appendix A Forms as “Exhibit 3.15.”

For collocation projects: In addition
to the Appendix A Form(s) which you must
submit in connection with the project identified in this application, you must also submit an Appendix A Form for each collocated RF emitter. Designate any additional RF safety compliance information as “Exhibit 3.15-A.”

✔
Verizon Wireless

34.174022°
-118.282517°
✔
28’-4” AGL
25'-9" AGL
26-5” AGL
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

For consistency, all Appendix A forms submitted must use effective radiated power (ERP) units of measure. Do not use effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP). To verify your understanding of this requirement, you must append the letters “ERP” following each wattage listing in each Appendix A form you submit.

Initial here _______ to indicate that al l required Exhibit 3.15 and 3.15-A forms are attached hereto.

3.16 Considering your response in Exhibit 3.15, above, and any other identifiable RF emitters that FCC OET Bulletin 65 requires be evaluated in connection with this Project, are all
portions of this Project cumulatively “categorically excluded” under FCC OET 65 requirements? ___ Yes ___ No

3.17: Does the project design or location requi re the Applicant to file an FAA Form 7460 or other documentation under Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77.13 et seq, or under the FCC rules? ___ Yes ___ No

3.18: If the answer to 3.17 is NO proceed to 4.00.

3.19: Attach complete copies of all requir ed FAA/FCC forms including all Exhibits and exhibits thereto, including without limitation FAA Form 7460. Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 3.17.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 3.17 is attached hereto.

4.00: Project Purpose

4.05: Indicate the dominant
purpose of the Project (check one or more, then proceed as directed):

__ Add network capacity without
adding significant new RF coverage area; Proceed
to 4.10.

__ Provide significant new
radio frequency coverage in an area not already served
by radio frequency coverage; Proceed to 4.10.

__ Increase the existing RF signal level in an area with existing radio frequency coverage; Proceed to 4.10.

__ Other; Proceed to 4.07.

4.07 Attach a written statement fully and expa nsively describing all portions or elements of the “Other” dominant purpose of this Project. Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit

4.07.”

AN
✔
✔
✔
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.07 is attached hereto.

4.10 Is this project intended to close or reduce what the applicant asserts to be a “significant gap” in its network? ___ Yes ___ No

4.11 If the answer to 4.10 is NO proceed to 4.20.

4.12 Attach a written statement fully and expansively describing the following:

a. A clear description of the geographic boundary of the claimed significant gap area, and
b. Attach a street-level map showing the geographic boundary of the claimed significant gap stated in 4.12(a) using the same standards as in 6.02; and c. Identify the size of the area, in units of square miles, of the claimed significant gap; and
d. Explain exactly the definition of the term “significant gap” as it applies to this project;
e. Explain exactly how the definition of significant gap term defined in 4.12(d) was developed, and identify who developed that definition, and when the definition was developed;
f. Discuss whether the significant gap term defined in 4.12(d) is identical to that term as used by some or all wireless carriers in the City of Glendale and/or the wireless industry as a whole, or whether that information is unknown; g. Specify whether the definition of “significant gap” provided in 4.12(d) is the same definition used in by this applicant and owner in all of its prior projects submitted to the City of Glendale, and if not, explain all differences and the reasons for the differences.
h. Discuss in detail all of the following in relation to the claimed significant gap area only. Where you have relied on external data sources, indentify those sources in detail your response.

1. Whether claimed significant gap affects significant commuter highway or railway, and if so, name each highway or railway, and how affected;

2. Describe in detail the nature and character of that area or the number of potential users in that area who may be affected by the claimed significant gap;

3. Describe whether the proposed facilities are needed to improve weak signals or to fill a complete void in coverage, and provide proof of either;

4. If the claimed significant gap covers well traveled roads on which customers lack roaming capabilities, identify all such well traveled roads by name within the claimed significant gap area and provide road use information about each such road;

5. If any “drive test” has been conducted within the claimed significant gap area, discuss in detail the methodology of how the test(s) was conducted, including details about the test equipment model numbers and location of the test equipment and antennas in or on the test vehicle, and provide all of the objective data collected during the drive test in .XLS or .CSV or ✔
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

similar portable spreadsheet format;

6. If the claimed significant gap affects a commercial district, show the boundaries of the district on the map

7. If the claimed significant gap poses a public safety risk, describe in detail the claimed risk, and the expansively discuss the basis for this claim. i. If the claimed significant gap is based in whole or in part on factors regarding any factor related to switching center capacity; dropped calls; failed hand-offs; interference from or to other cell sites; pilot channels; site hopping; degraded RXQUAL; degraded Ec/Io; and/or any failure to meet any carrier transmission goal or percentage goal, attach at least the most recent twelve months of historical data by month documenting at least (1) the results or numerical data of each claimed parameter; (2) the wireless carrier’s numerical and percentage requirements for each such claimed perimeter; (3) the total number of calls attempted for each month both successfully and unsuccessfully completed; (4) the total number of calls that were not completed including failed originations; failed hand-offs; and non-normal call terminations; and (5) for every such claimed parameter that is not categorized by way of number or percentage, provide the data in the way kept by the carrier.
j. Provide all other relevant information you want the City of Glendale to consider when evaluating your claim of a significant gap.

Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.12.” Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.12 is attached hereto.

4.13 Is the proposed project the least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12? ___ Yes ___ No

4.14 If the answer to 4.13 is NO proceed to 4.20.

4.15 Attach a written statement fully and expansively describing at a minimum:

a. Why this project is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12.

b. Identify and discuss all alternative sites and means considered to close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12.

c. Whether two or more sites in lieu of the site proposed in Section 1 could close the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12, or to reduce the significant gap to be less than significant, with less impact on the community as compared with a single site? If the answer is no, please explain in narrative format the basis for that answer.

d. Whether the City of Glendale requiring two or more sites in place of the site proposed in Section 1 would prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the applicant from providing any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.

AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

If the response asserts that a prohibition or effective prohibition would occur, explain in detail in narrative form all of the reasons why it would

e. Include and attach all information whatsoever you relied on in reaching your affirmative determination in 4.13.

f. Include any other information you believe would assist the City of Glendale make findings regarding whether the proposed project is the least intrusive means of closing the significant gap claimed and described in 4.12, or to reduce the significant gap to be less than significant.

Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.15.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhib it 4.15 is attached hereto. Proceed to 4.20

4.20 If any portion of the project is to utilize radio spectrum that does not require an FCC license, identify in detail the portions of the project that used unlicensed spectrum.

Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.20.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.20 is attached hereto.

4.25 Is this project designed to use any form of direct site-to-site radio interconnection (i.e., microwave or donor/donee configuration, for example) with another existing or currently planned site? ___ Yes ___ No

4.26: If the answer to 4.25 is NO proceed to 5.00.

4.27: Attach a detailed written statement fu lly and expansively describing the radio interconnection proposed, and identify all other existing or planned sites that will be interconnected with this project. Designate this Exhibit, “Exhibit 4.25.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 4.25 is attached hereto.

5.00: Build-Out Requirements

5.01: Do any of radio services identified in 3.09 above require the licensee to provide specific radio frequency/population build-out coverage pursuant to the underlying FCC license? ___ Yes ___ No

5.02: If the answer to 5.01 is NO proceed to 6.00.

5.03: Have all of the FCC build-out requirem ents as required by all licenses covering all radio services proposed at this Project been met? ___ Yes ___ No

5.04: If the answer to 5.03 is YES proceed to 6.00.
✔
✔
✔
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

5.05: Disclose by licensee call sign id entified in Section 3.02 all build-out requirements/obligations which have yet to be met, and the known or estimated date when the remaining build-out requirements will be met. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 5.05.”

Initial here _______ to indicate th at Exhibit 5.05 is attached hereto.

5.10 Will this proposed site be interconnected via radio frequency transmissions to any other site or sites now constructed, proposed, or anticipated? For the purpose of this question, interconnection includes one or more radio frequency links to provide for ‘back-haul’ from this site to a switching center or centralized node location. ___ Yes ___ No

5.11: If the answer to 5.10 is NO proceed to 6.00.

5.15 Identify by physical address (or if none, by geographic description) all other sites, regardless of whether now constructed, proposed, or anticipated, that are to be interconnected with this project site. Disclose in technical detail the proposed method of interconnection. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 5.15.”

Initial here _______ to indicate th at Exhibit 5.15 is attached hereto.

6.00: Radio Frequency Coverage Maps

6.01: Where a licensee intends to provide radio frequency coverage from the project to an identified geographic coverage, the coverage maps and information requested in Section 6 are required Exhibits.

Distributed Antenna System (DAS) providers and all others who are not the RF
emitters for the radio services proposed for this project and identified in 3.09: You must
provide radio frequency coverage maps prepared by the FCC licensee(s) that will control the RF emissions from this project. Radio frequency coverage maps required here that are completed by a DAS provider are unacceptable if they are not the FCC licensee or in full control of the RF emitter for the particular wireless service transmitted through the project.

If no geographic coverage area is identified, initial here _______ and proceed to 7.00.

6.02 For the coverage maps required here, the following mandatory requirements apply.

Failure to adhere to these requirements may delay your application’s determination of completeness.

a. The size of each submitted map must be no smaller than 11” by 8.5.” Each map must be of the same physical size and map area scale. Each map must use the same base map (i.e., same streets and legends shown on all).

AN
X
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

b. If the FCC rules for any proposed radio service defines a minimum radio frequency signal level that level must be shown on the map in a color easily distinguishable from the base paper or transparency layer, and adequately identified by RF level and map color or gradient in the map legend. If no minimum signal level is defined by the FCC rules you must indicate that in the legend of each RF coverage map. You may show other RF signal level(s) on the map so long as they are adequately identified by objective RF level and map color or gradient in the map legend.

6.03: Provide a map consistent with the re quirements of 6.02 showing the existing RF coverage within the City of Glendale on the Applicant’s same network, if any (if no existing coverage, so state). This map should not
depict any RF coverage to be
provided by the Project. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 6.03.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 6.03 is attached hereto.

6.04: Provide a map consistent with the requi rements of 6.02 showing the RF coverage to be provided only
by the Project. This map should not depict any RF coverage provided any other existing or proposed wireless sites. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 6.04.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 6.04 is attached hereto.

6.05: Provide a map consistent with the requi rements of 6.02 showing the RF coverage to be provided by the Project and
by all other existing wireless sites on the same
network should the Project site be activated. Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 6.05.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 6.05 is attached hereto.

7.00: Project Photographs and Photo Simulations

7.01: The Applicant shall submit photo simulati ons consistent with the following standards:

1. Minimum size of each base photo and
each photo simulation must be 10 inches by 8
inches (landscape orientation). Each base photo and matching photo simulation must be the same size. Single sheets of 11 x 8 ½ inches showing base photos and photo simulations on the same page are unacceptable.

2. All elements of the Project as proposed by the Applicant which can be seen from any point at ground level, or from any level within or on buildings within 500 feet of the Project must be shown in one or more close-in photo simulations (i.e., panel antennas, omni-directional antennas, GPS antennas, antenna camouflage devices, cable trays; equipment cabinets; working lights; etc.).

3. The overall Project as proposed by the Applicant must be shown in three or more area AN
AN
AN
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

photo simulations. Base photographs must, at a minimum, be taken from widely scattered positions of 120 degrees. A map detail showing each location where a photograph was taken, the proposed site, and the direction to the site from each photo location must be included. Base photographs taken from locations that have some physical feature obscuring the Project site, and the photo simulations associated with those same base photographs, are not acceptable.

Attach all base photographs and photo simulatio ns to this application marked as Exhibit

7.01. The purpose of the photo simulations is to allow the City of Glendale to visualize the Project as completed, therefore the number of site photos, and photo simulations, and the actual or simulated camera location of these photos and photo simulations are subject to City of Glendale determination. The Applicant should submit photos and photo simulations consistent with these instructions, and be prepared to provide additional photos and photo simulations should they be requested by the City of Glendale.

The Applicant certifies by initialing in the space at the end of this paragraph that that all of the photos and photo simulations provided for Exhibit 7.01 are accurate and reliable photographic representations of the current project site and the proposed project to be constructed or modified, and that the Applicant is fully aware that the City of Glendale will rely on all of the photos and photo simulations provided in Exhibit 7.01 when it considers approval of this Project, and later when determining project completion.

Applicant’s initials: ___________ (If not initialed, this application may be deemed incomplete by the City of Glendale.)

8.00: Alternative Candidate Sites

8.01: Amateur radio applicants proceed to 9.00.

8.02: Has the Applicant or Owner or anyone work ing on behalf of the Applicant or Owner secured or attempted to secure any leases or lease-options or similar formal or informal agreements in connection with this
Project for any sites other than the
proposed project site? ___ Yes ___ No

8.03: If the answer to 8.02 is NO proceed to 8.05.

8.04: Provide the physical address of each su ch other location, and provide an expansive technical explanation as to why each such other site was disfavored over the Project Site.

Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 8.04.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 8.04 is attached hereto.

8.05: Considering this proposed site, is it the one and only one location within or outside of the
AN
X
AN
AN

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

City of Glendale that can possibly meet the objectives of the Project? ___ Yes ___ No

8.04: If the answer to 8.05 is NO, proceed to 9.00.

8.05: Provide a technically expa nsive and detailed explanation supported as required by comprehensive radio frequency data and all other necessary information fully describing why the proposed site is the one is it the one and only one location within or outside of the City of Glendale that can possibly meet the radio frequency objectives of the Project.

Explain, in exact and expansive technical detail all of the objectives of this Project that can be achieved only at this project site, and why.

Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 8.05.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 8.05 is attached hereto.

9.00: Identification of Key Persons

9.01: Identify by name, title, company affilia tion, work address, telephone number and extension, and email address the key person or persons most knowledgeable regarding this Project so that the City of Glendale may contact them with questions regarding the Project:

9.10 Person responsible for the final site selection for the Project; Name:

Title:

Company Affiliation:

Work Address:

Telephone / Ext.:

Email Address:

9.20 Person responsible for the radio freq uency engineering of the Project; Name:

Title:

Company Affiliation:

Work Address:

Telephone / Ext.:

Email Address:

9.30 Person responsible for rejection of othe r candidate sites evaluated, if any; Name:

Title:

Company Affiliation:

Work Address:

Telephone / Ext.:

Email Address:

X
Dimitri Gogas
RF
ExteNet Systems
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
415-617-5190
[email protected]
AN
Joe Milone
Joe Milone
Executive Director
Executive Director
ExteNet Systems
ExteNet Systems
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502
(281) 203-6100
(281) 203-6100
[email protected]
[email protected]

City of Glendale, California
Supplemental Wireless/DAS
Application Rev 11/09/10

WirelessSupplementalAppNov9,2010

Applicant’s Representative Listed
in 1.10 Must Initial Here: ___________

9.40 If more than one key person is now or was involved in any of the functions identified in this section at or before the time of the submission of this form, attach a separate sheet providing the same information for each additional person, and identifying which function or functions are/were performed by each additional person.

Designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 9.40.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that the information above is complete and there is no

Exhibit 9.4, or initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 9.40 is attached.

10.00 Additional Informatio n Provided by Applicant

10.01 You are invited and encouraged to provide any additional written information that you wish the City of Glendale to consider in connection with your proposed project.

If you wish to attach information, designate this Exhibit “Exhibit 10.”

Initial here _______ to indicate that Exhibit 10 is attached hereto, or
initial here _______ to indicate that there is no Exhibit 10 attached.

11.00: Certification of Accuracy and Reliability

11.01: The undersigned certifies on be half of itself, the Applicant, and the Owner that the information provided in this form and its contents are true and complete to the best of the undersigned’s ability and knowledge, and that information provided here should be relied upon by the City of Glendale as being accurate and complete when the City of Glendale evaluates this project.

_______________________________ ________________________ Signature Title

_______________________________ ________________________ Print Name Provide Email Address

_______________________________ ________________________ Print Company Name Provide Telephone Number

_______________________________
Date Signed

<Last Page: Remember to sign above and initial below>

AN
AN
ExteNet Systems, LLC Authorized Agent
Alexander Novak
[email protected]
Teleworld Solutions
682-351-3335
2/21/2023
AN

FCC/LSGAC Local Official’s Guide to RF
Optional Checklist for Local Government
To Determine Whether a Facility is Categorically Excluded Purpose: The FCC has determined that many wireless facilities are unlikely to cause human exposures in excess of RF exposure guidelines. Operators of those facilities are exempt from routinely having to determine their compliance. These facilities are termed "categorically excluded." Section 1.1307(b)(1) of the Commission's rules defines those categorically excluded facilities. This checklist will assist state and local government agencies in identifying those wireless facilities that are categorically excluded, and thus are highly unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. Provision of the information identified on this checklist may also assist FCC staff in evaluating any inquiry regarding a facility’s compliance with the RF exposure guidelines.
continue

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Facility Operator’s Legal Name: ExteNet Systems, Inc.

Facility Operator’s Mailing Address: 300 E Magnolia Blvd, Ste. 400, Burbank, CA 91502 Facility Operator’s Contact Name/Title: Drew Yoon
Facility Operator’s Office Telephone: 94 9-232-2359
Facility Operator’s Fax:

Facility Name: SCL Glendale 237
Facility Address: FRONT OF 1544 W KENNETH RD
Facility City/Community: Glendale
Facility State and Zip Code: CA 91201
Latitude: 34° 10' 26.48" N
Longitude: 118° 16' 57.06" W
Optional Local Government Checklist (page 2)

EVALUATION OF CATEGORICAL

EXCLUSION

12. Licensed Radio Service (see attached Table 1):Personal Communications Service

13. Structure Type (free-standing or building/roof-mounted): Free Standing

14. Antenna Type [omnidirectional or directional (includes sectored)]: Directional

15. Height above ground of the lowest point of the antenna (in meters): 7.85 m

16. Check if all of the following are true:
(a) This facility will be operated in the Multipoint Distribution Service, Paging and Radiotelephone Service, Cellular Radiotelephone Service, Narrowband or Broadband Personal Communications Service, Private Land Mobile Radio Services Paging Operations, Private Land Mobile Radio Service Specialized Mobile Radio, Local Multipoint Distribution Service, or service regulated under Part 74, Subpart I (see question 12).
(b) This facility will not be mounted on a building (see question 13). (c) The lowest point of the antenna will be at least 10 meters above the ground (see question 15).

If box 16 is checked, this facility is categorically excluded and is unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. The remainder of the checklist need not be completed. If box 16 is not checked, continue to question 17.

17. Enter the power threshold for categorical exclusion for this service from the attached Table 1 in watts ERP or EIRP∗ (note: EIRP = (1.64) X ERP): Please see attached calculations

18. Enter the total number of channels if this will be an omnidirectional antenna, or the maximum number of channels in any sector if this will be a sectored antenna:

19. Enter the ERP or EIRP per channel (using the same units as in question 17):

20. Multiply answer 18 by answer 19:

21. Is the answer to question 20 less than or equal to the value from question 17 (yes) If the answer to question 21 is YES, this facility is categorically excluded. It is unlikely to cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines.

If the answer to question 21 is NO, this facility is not categorically excluded. Further investigation may be appropriate to verify whether the facility may cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines.
∗"ERP" means "effective radiated power" and "EIRP" means "effective isotropic radiated power 1054 Texan Trail, Suite 300 • Grapevine, Texas 76051
Tel: 682-651-0034 • Fax: 817-527-4081
[email protected] • www.gssmidwest.com
MPE Compliance Checklist
GSS || Page 1 of 2
This form shall be filled out by the RF Engineer after construction drawings are finalized and prior to completion of the NEPA report. A new checklist must be prepared for any new or modified facility including height, power/ERP, antenna changes, channel adds, or frequency additions.

RF Engineer Signature: _________
___________________________

1. Are the following sta
tements TRUE?
a. This facility will be operated between 300 kHz and 100 GHz [including 600 MHz, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 1900 MHz, 2100 MHz, CBRS (3 GHz), LAA (5 GHz), mmWave (24 GHz, 28 GHz, 39 GHz) frequency bands]. YES NO
b. This facility will not be mounted on a building. YES NO c. This facility employs frequency bands between 300 kHz and 100 GHz [including 600 MHz, 700 MHz, 800 MHz, 1900 MHz, 2100 MHz, CBRS (3 GHz), LAA (5 GHz), mmWave (24 GHz, 28 GHz, 39 GHz) frequency bands], is the total power of all RF sources ≤1 as per the following formula.

Figure 1: Multiple RF Source Summation Equation YES NO ERPj = the available maximum time-averaged power or the ERP, whichever is greater, of fixed, mobile, or portable RF source j.

ERPth,j = exemption threshold ERP for fixed, mobile, or portable RF source j, at a distance of at least λ/2π, according to the applicable MPE-based Single RF Source formula at the location in question.

Note: EIRP = (1.64 X ERP)
* If Steps 1.a, b and c are “Yes”
, then the tower is deemed ‘exempt’ from the requirement to perform routine environmental processing for RF exposure. Therefore, Conduct Step 5, provide a copy of the following Compliance Statement to the Project Manager or vendor completing the NEPA report.

X
X
X
Site Name: SCL GLENDALE 237
RFEngineer: Prasad Kuppurangan
Site Number: SW-CA-GLENDA-00237
Date: 2/21/2023

GSS ||Page 2 of 2
*
If you checked NO to any of the three statements, this facility is not ‘exempt’. Further investigation is appropriate to verify whether the facility may cause exposure in excess of the FCC’s guidelines. Continue to question 2.

2. NOTE on Building-Mounts: GSS recommends full MPE evaluation assessment on all rooftops, water tanks and other building mounted antennas - no exemptions apply. (Conduct the full MPE evaluation study then proceed to Step 3 regardless of response)

3. Are the RF Exposure limits in excess of FCC regulations (47 CFR 1.1310 and 2.1093)? YES NO (If “No”, skip question 4)

4. Will the RF power densities exceed occupational or public exposure limits under the RF Exposure Study if all recommended RF mitigation procedures are implemented? YES NO (
If “Yes”, contact RF Planning and Regulatory Affairs for additional mitigation measures before proceeding)

5. F
inal Action: Attach the MPE Analysis and forward this form along with any additional MPE documentation to the Project Manager.

Statement of Compliance with FCC Rules 47 CFR Sec. 1.1307 & Sec. 1.1310 The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulates the maximum permissible exposure (“MPE”) of persons to RF radiation and wireless carriers must comply with the requirements of the FCC. The relevant requirements which deal with wireless antenna towers and other structures are found in Sections 1.1307 and 1.1310 of the FCC’s RF Exposure Rules.

Appendix

314298574 - 1 -
ALJ/CFG/avs/lil Date of Issuance 9/30/2019

Decision 19-09-045 September 26, 2019

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Application of ExteNet Systems, Inc., for a
Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity to Provide Full Facilities-Based
and Resold Competitive Local Exchange
and Interexchange Services.

Application 18-11-002

DECISION GRANTING EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.

A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY

IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FULL FACILITIES-BASED AND RESOLD

COMPETITIVE LOCAL EXCHANGE AND INTEREXCHANGE SERVICE

Summary
Pursuant to Public Utilities Code § 1001, we grant ExteNet Services, Inc., a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive local exchange and interexchange service in California subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Ordering Paragraphs.

This proceeding is closed.

1. Background
On November 1, 2018, ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI), a corporation authorized to do business in California, filed an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to provide full facilities-based and resold Local Exchange and Interexchange competitive services in the service territories of Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California (AT&T A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 2 -
California), Frontier California Inc. (Frontier California),1 Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. d/b/a Frontier Communications of California (Frontier Communications), and Consolidated Communications of California Company (Consolidated Communications, formerly SureWest Telephone)2 and interexchange service in California.

ESI is a privately held Delaware corporation which has operating permits in most states throughout the United States.3 ESI’s principal place of business is in Lisle, Illinois. The ultimate parent of ESI is Mount Royal Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which is owned by multiple private equity firms and individuals in the management of ESI, none of which own a majority share.4
ESI itself is the sole owner of six subsidiaries, each one authorized to provide intrastate telecommunications services in at least one state.5 Among these six subsidiaries is one holding a certificate authorizing it to conduct business as a telephone corporation in California; that entity is known as ExteNet Systems (California) LLC (U6959C) (hereinafter, ESI-CA).

Originally, in 2005, ESI-CA’s certificate and utility designation number (U6959C) were issued to its parent, ESI. ESI-CA did not exist at the time. In two decisions, one (D.05-07-004) issued shortly after ESI was initially authorized

1 Frontier California was formerly Verizon California, Inc. (Verizon). As of April 1, 2016, Verizon’s operations in California were acquired and are now operated by Frontier California, Inc., pursuant to Decision (D.) 15-12-005.
2 SureWest Telephone was acquired by Consolidated Communications Inc. in 2012, pursuant to D.12-06-004, and SureWest Telephone changed its name to Consolidated Communications of California Company as of January 1, 2016.
3 See Application at 2. ESI represents in its application that it holds authorizations to provide telecommunications services in 43 states, plus the District of Columbia. 4 Ibid.
5 Application at 2.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 3 -
to operate as a telephone corporation in California and the other (D.06-04-063) a year later, the Commission increased ESI’s operating authority to allow ESI to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive local exchange and non-dominant interexchange services.

In November 2006, ESI organized ESI-CA as its wholly owned subsidiary.6 In April 2007, the Commission granted ESI permission to transfer its CPCN to ESI-CA.7
ESI explains in its current application that it desires a CPCN of its own, again, which it will use to provide the same services in California as ESI-CA, even while ESI-CA continues to operate in California.8 Documents, sent by ESI to the Communications Division of the Commission, indicate that ESI’s purpose for seeking another CPCN while ESI-CA continues to hold the original CPCN is “to align the [ESI-CA and ESI] companies with their current and future customer focus … and to obtain debt financing.”9
ESI represents that it and ESI-CA will pursue two new debt financing transactions, each to a separate lender. According to ESI, its subsidiary, ESI-CA, will pledge some of its California assets to secure financing from one source and other of its California assets to secure financing from a different source; however, ESI will provide the services associated with some of the pledged assets while

6 Advice Letter No. 4, dated April 3, 2007, at 2.
7 On April 24, 2007 the Commission approved the transfer requested in Advice Letter No. 4. 8 Application at 7 (“… Applicant will offer similar services at the same rates and on the same conditions as currently provided by [ESI-CA] …”); see also, ESI’s Response to ALJ Request for Additional Information, filed May 29, 2019, at 2 (“ESI and ESI CA will provide identical services in California following issuance of a CPCN to ESI”).
9 Advice Letter No. 141, dated June 7, 2019, at 3. This advice letter sought permission to transfer control of ESI-CA to a newly created, indirect subsidiary of ESI, called ExteNet Issuer, LLC. The Commission granted permission for the change of control on June 10, 2019.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 4 -
ESI-CA continues to provide services associated with the remainder of the newly pledged assets.10
ESI provides services to the following types of business customers:
wireless carriers, broadband providers, commercial property owners, enterprises, communities and Internet of Things (IoT) companies. It has a comparatively small number of core customers which provide significant, aggregate, annual, consolidated revenue. If its application for a CPCN is granted, ESI intends to provide infrastructure facilities, such as dark fiber and metro cell nodes, to transport and transmit communications from wireless and wireline carriers in California. ESI states that it expects that any outside plant construction will be small scale, such as short conduit routes, installation of poles or conduit where existing facilities are inadequate and small, above-ground facilities in roadways and other previously developed rights of way. 11 ESI filed its application on November 1, 2018. On November 29, 2018 the Commission determined the proceeding should be characterized as ratesetting and a hearing would be necessary. The proceeding was assigned to Commissioner Liane Randolph and Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Charles Ferguson.

A prehearing conference was held before the assigned ALJ on April 22, 2019 at which only ESI appeared. On May 29, 2019 ESI supplemented its application by submitting further confidential financial information requested by the assigned ALJ at the April 22 prehearing conference.

10 See ESI’s Response to ALJ Request for Additional Information, filed May 29, 2019, at 2 (“Certain assets currently held in California by ESI CA will be pledged to one financing party and other assets currently held by ESI CA will be pledged to a separate financing party[;] … both ESI and ESI CA will need CPCNs in order to allow them to provide the services associated with those pledged assets”).
11 See Application, Exh. D.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 5 -
A scoping memo was issued by the assigned Commissioner on August 12, 2019.

2. Jurisdiction
Public Utilities Code (Pub. Util. Code) § 216(a) defines the term “public utility” to include a “telephone corporation,” which in turn is defined in Pub.

Util. Code § 234(a) as “every corporation or person owning, controlling, operating, or managing any telephone line for compensation within this state.” ESI proposes to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive services throughout California.

ESI is a Common Carrier as defined by § 153 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Act) eligible to interconnect with the public switched telephone network pursuant to §§ 251 and 252 of the Act, and that if granted a CPCN, it will operate as a telephone corporation under Pub. Util. Code § 234(a), and obey the Public Utility Code and all Commission rules, decisions, and orders applicable to telephone corporations.

3. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Pursuant to CEQA and Rule 2.412 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission examines projects to determine any potential environmental impacts in order that adverse effects are avoided, and environmental quality is fully restored or enhanced as much as possible under CEQA.

As noted above, ESI’s proposed construction activities will generally include the installation of dark fiber and metro cell nodes, to transport and transmit communications by wireless and wireline carriers in California. These

12 Unless otherwise noted, items labeled “Rule” are from the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 6 -
will be small scale, such as short conduit routes, installation of poles, or conduit where existing facilities are inadequate, and small, above-ground facilities in roadways and other previously developed rights of way.

These activities fall within the following classes of projects that are exempt from CEQA and for which neither an Environmental Impact Report nor a Negative Declaration is required.
 Class 1 Exemption: operation, repair, maintenance, leasing or minor alteration of existing public or private structures and facilities, with negligible or no expansion of an existing use. This includes existing facilities used to provide public utility services. (14 CCR § 15301.)
 Class 3 Exemption: construction including water main, sewage, electrical, gas and other utility extensions of reasonable length to serve such construction. This includes the construction of limited numbers of new small facilities or utility extensions. (14 CCR § 15303.)
ESI’s proposed activities involve construction of reasonably short utility extensions (Class 3). In order to provide its service, ESI will install its dark fiber and metro cell nodes in existing roadways and rights of way. The fiber will either be attached to existing poles or will be placed underground in existing conduits or, if there are no poles and no underground conduit, ESI will add them to the existing right of way. Exemption of these activities is consistent with Commission precedent. ESI’s proposed new construction activities are like those undertaken by other carriers that we have decided are categorically exempt from CEQA. See, e.g, D.06-04-063 (ClearLinx Network Corporation); D.06-04-067 (CA-CLEC LLC).

ESI requests approval to utilize a procedure for expedited review of its projects once it is aware of a specific site(s) in which it plans construction. The proposed procedure tracks the expedited review procedure that we have A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 7 -
approved for other carriers. Such a process will expedite CEQA review and is appropriate for the type of construction outlined here, which will be categorically exempt. By establishing this expedited review process, we can review the information on a specific project to confirm that it is categorically exempt from CEQA or to explain why further environmental review is required.

At the same time, the proposed CEQA review process will enable ESI to undertake construction of its projects in an efficient manner without experiencing delays caused by an unnecessarily protracted CEQA review.

As we provided for other carriers, the following procedure will be used to obtain Commission approval of ESI’s claimed CEQA exemptions for proposed construction projects:
 ESI will provide the Commission’s Energy Division with:
 A detailed description of the proposed project,
including:
 Customer(s) to be served;
 The precise location of the proposed construction
project; and
 Regional and local site maps.
 A description of the environmental setting, to include at a minimum:
 Cultural, historical, and paleontological resources;
 Biological resources; and
 Current land use and zoning.
 A construction workplan, to include:
 Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Archaeological Resources;
 Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Biological Resources;
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 8 -
 A detailed schedule of construction activities, including site restoration activities;
 A description of construction/installation techniques;  A list of other agencies contacted with respect to siting, land use planning, and environmental resource issues,
including contact information; and
 A list of permits required for the proposed project.
 A statement of the CEQA exemption(s) applicable to the proposed project; and
 Documentation and factual evidence enough to support
a finding that the claimed exemption(s) is (are)
applicable.
 The Energy Division will review ESI’s submission for the proposed project to confirm that the claimed exemption(s) from CEQA are applicable.
 Within 21 days from the date of ESI’s submittal, the
Energy Division will issue either:
 A Notice to Proceed (NTP) and file a Notice of
Exemption with the State Clearinghouse, Office of
Planning and Research, or
 A letter of denial stating the specific reasons why the claimed exemption(s) are not applicable to the proposed project.

We have reviewed the application and find that:
 ESI’s proposed facilities-based project activities are very limited;
 These activities would in almost all circumstances be very likely to qualify for an exemption from CEQA; and
 The proposed process for reviewing the applicability of CEQA exemptions to ESI’s facilities-based projects is not only adequate for the Commission’s purposes as CEQA
Lead Agency, but is also in the public interest because it enables ESI to respond in a timely manner to requests for A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 9 -
service without the delay or burden of a full CEQA review when such review is unnecessary.

We therefore approve ESI’s proposed process for Commission review of claimed CEQA exemptions for construction projects undertaken pursuant to ESI’s full facilities-based authority, based on the specific facts of this case with the following modifications related to the Commission’s Energy Division review and approval or disapproval of the proposed exemptions.

If the Energy Division disapproves ESI’s claimed CEQA exemption(s) and issues a letter of denial to ESI, ESI must either re-design the specific project and facilities and then reapply for a finding of exemption from CEQA, or file a formal application with the Commission seeking the requisite approval and full CEQA review, before commencing any construction activities.

ESI shall not perform any full facilities-based construction activities without first obtaining an NTP from the Energy Division or authorization by the Commission after the requisite environmental review.

We have previously determined that the public convenience and necessity require that competition be allowed in the provision of competitive local exchange service, Rulemaking 95-04-043/Investigation 95-04-044. Granting this application will benefit the public interest by expanding the availability of technologically advanced telecommunications services within the state.

4. Financial Qualifications
To be granted a CPCN, an applicant for authority to provide full facilities-based and resold competitive local exchange and interexchange services must demonstrate that it has a minimum of $100,000 cash or cash equivalent, A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 10 -
reasonably liquid and readily available to meet the firm’s start-up expenses.13 An applicant must also demonstrate that it has sufficient additional resources to cover all deposits required by local exchange carriers and/or interexchange carriers in order to provide the proposed service.14 In this proceeding, ESI provided its audited financial statements for 2017 and 2018 showing that $100,000, plus an amount equal to the deposits required by AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, and Consolidated Communications would be available to ESI for one year following certification.

Since ESI has provided documentation that it possesses a minimum of $100,000 that is reasonably liquid and available, it has demonstrated that it has enough funds to meet its start-up expenses and has fulfilled this requirement. ESI’s financial documentation will be subject to verification and review by the Commission for one year to ensure that such funds are available.

5. Technical Qualifications
To be granted a CPCN for authority to provide competitive local exchange and interexchange service, an applicant must make a reasonable showing of managerial and technical expertise in telecommunications or a related business. 15 ESI has been a part of the telecommunications industry nationwide for many years and supplied biographical information on its management in Exhibit I (eye) to its application that demonstrates it and they have sufficient expertise and

13 The financial requirement for Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLEC) is contained in D.95-12-056, Appendix C. The financial requirement for Non-Dominant Interexchange Carriers (NDIEC) is contained in D.91-10-041.
14 The requirement for Competitive Local Carrier (CLC) applicants to demonstrate that they have additional financial resources to meet any deposits required by underlying Local Exchange Carriers (LEC) and/or IECs is set forth in D.95-12-056, Appendix C. For NDIECs, the requirement is found in D.93-05-010.
15 D.95-12-056 at Appendix C, Rule 4.A.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 11 -
training to operate as a telecommunications provider in California. Furthermore, ESI’s wholly owned subsidiary, ESI-CA, has been providing telecommunications service in California for several years. There are no outstanding complaints against ESI-CA at this Commission and no notices of deficiencies have ever been issued against ESI-CA by this Commission. ESI represents in its application that it will share the same management team with ESI-CA, thereby benefitting from that team’s knowledge and experience with the California market.16 In its application, ESI verified that no one associated with or employed by ESI as an affiliate, officer, director, partner, or owner of more than 10 percent of ESI, or anyone acting in a management capacity for ESI:
(a) held one of these positions with a company that filed for bankruptcy; (b) been personally found liable, or held one of these positions with a company that has been found liable, for fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; (c) been convicted of a felony; (d) been (to his/her knowledge) the subject of a criminal referral by judge or public agency; (e) had a telecommunications license or operating authority denied, suspended, revoked, or limited in any jurisdiction; (f) personally entered into a settlement, or held one of these positions with a company that has entered into settlement of criminal or civil claims involving violations of §§ 17000 et seq., §§ 17200 et seq., or §§ 17500 et seq. of the California Business & Professions Code, or of any other statute, regulation, or decisional law relating to fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; or (g) been found to have violated any statute, law, or rule pertaining to public utilities or other regulated industries; or (h) entered into any settlement agreements or made any voluntary payments or agreed to any

16 Application at 8, section II, subsection 10.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 12 -
other type of monetary forfeitures in resolution of any action by any regulatory body, agency, or attorney general.17
Also, to the best of ESI’s knowledge, neither ESI, nor any affiliate, officer, director, partner, nor owner of more than 10 percent of ESI, nor any person acting in such capacity whether or not formally appointed, is being, or has been investigated by the Federal Communications Commission or any law enforcement or regulatory agency for failure to comply with any law, rule or order.18
For the above reasons, we find that ESI has complied with the requirements of D.13-05-035.

ESI represents that no deposit is required by AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, and Consolidated Communications. 19 Therefore, no additional resources are required at this time to cover deposits.

6. Tariffs
ESI has requested detariffed status. In its application, ESI states that it does not intend to offer basic service or switched access. It represents that it will provide the services described above in section one “on a non-discriminatory,” “individual case basis” and “at competitive rates.”20 ESI further represents that it will comply with all consumer protection rules identified in D.98-08-031 to the extent they are applicable to the services ESI provides. Furthermore, ESI represents that it will first comply with all tariffing obligations should it ever

17 See Application, Exhibit J, par. 4. These certifications are required by D.13-05-035, Ordering Paragraph 14.
18 Application, Exh. J, par. 4.
19 Application at 8 - 9.
20 Id. at 9, section II, subsection 13.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 13 -
decide to offer basic services or switched access.21 Exemption from tariffing obligations is therefore appropriate.

7. Map of Service Territory
To be granted a CPCN for authority to provide competitive local exchange service, an applicant must provide a map of the service territories it proposes to serve.22 In Exhibit F to its application, ESI provided a map of the location of its proposed service territory, in compliance with this requirement.

8. Rule 3.1(i) Statement
Rule 3.1(i) sets forth the requirement that a utility filing an application under Pub. Util. Code § 1001, provide a statement regarding General Order (GO) 104-A, Section 2. ESI states that it is not aware of any reportable matters pursuant to General Order 104-A, Section 2.23 ESI, therefore, has nothing to report under this rule. On a going forward basis, though, ESI must file all reports required of a public utility under Commission jurisdiction and it has represented that it will do so.24

9. Expected Customer Base
ESI provided its estimated customer base for the first and fifth years of operation in Exhibit H of its application. Therefore, ESI has complied with this requirement.

10. Requests for Non-dominant Carrier Treatment and for Exemptions ESI requests treatment as a non-dominant interexchange carrier, which would include exemption from the requirements of Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830

21 Application 9, Section II, Subsection 13.
22 D.95-12-056 at Appendix C, Rule 4.E.
23 Application at 9, section II, subsection 14.
24 Ibid.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 14 -
concerning stocks and securities and § 851 concerning the encumbrance and transfer of utility property. While the Commission has granted exemption from §§ 816 – 830 to others, exemption from § 851 is not commonly granted unless the exemption is expressly limited to issuances of securities and transfers or encumbrances of a utility’s assets for purposes of securing debt. 25 The Commission issued detailed rules regarding exemption of non-dominant carriers in D.85-01-008, which it subsequently modified in D.85-07-081 and D.85-11-044.

ESI represents that it will provide service to business customers only, specifically, wireless service providers, and that it seeks exemption from § 851 for the limited purposes of securing debt. We grant ESI’s request for non-dominant interexchange carrier status, which provides an exemption from Pub. Util.

Code §§ 816-830, as well as ESI’s request for a limited exemption from § 851 in order to use stocks and securities to secure debt, provided that it follows all rules detailed in the above referenced decisions.

ESI also requests exemption from any requirement to maintain its books and records in accordance with the Uniform System of Accounts specified in Title 47 C.F.R. Part 32. Consistent with D.99-02-038, which relieved competitive local carriers that are not part of an incumbent local exchange carrier corporate entity from the requirement to keep their books of account in conformance with the Uniform System of Accounts, we will extend similar relief to ESI.

11. Safety Considerations
With the adoption of the Safety Policy Statement of the California Public Utilities Commission on July 10, 2014, the Commission has, among other things, heightened its focus on the potential safety implications of every proceeding. We

25 See D.85-07-081; D.85-11-044; D.86-08-057 and D.90-09-032.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 15 -
have considered the potential safety implications here. The Commission is satisfied that ESI will meet the Commission’s minimum safety goals and expectations of competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) because: (1) ESI has taken steps to meet the financial requirements as set forth in this decision for a facilities-based CLEC, and (2) ESI is a public utility that is required pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 451 to “… furnish and maintain such adequate, efficient, just and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, including telephone facilities … as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public.”

12. Conclusion
We conclude that ESI’s application conforms to our rules for certification as a competitive local exchange and interexchange carrier. Accordingly, we grant ESI a CPCN to provide resold and competitive full facilities-based local exchange telecommunications service in the service territory of AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, and Consolidated Communications and interexchange service in California subject to compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Ordering Paragraphs.

The CPCN granted by this decision provides benefits to ESI and corresponding obligations. ESI receives authority to operate in the prescribed service territory, and this authority enables ESI, pursuant to 251 of the 1934 Communications Act, as amended by the 1996 Telecommunications Act (47 U.S.C. § 251), to interconnect with telecommunications carriers. 26 This authority also enables ESI to obtain access to public rights-of-way in California as

26 The California Public Utilities Code uses the term “telephone corporation.” Its counterpart in federal law is a “telecommunications carrier.”
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 16 -
set forth in D.98-10-058, subject to the CEQA requirements set forth in this decision.

In return, ESI is obligated to comply with all Public Utilities Code provisions, Commission rules, General Orders, and decisions applicable to telephone corporations providing approved services. The applicable statutes, rules, General Orders, and decisions include, but are not limited to consumer protection rules, tariffing, and reporting requirements. Moreover, ESI is obligated to pay all Commission prescribed user fees and public purpose program surcharges as set forth in the Appendix B of this decision, to comply with CEQA, and to adhere to Pub. Util. Code § 451 which states that every public utility “…shall furnish and maintain such adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, including telephone facilities, as defined in § 54.1 of the Civil Code, as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public.”

13. Requests to File Under Seal
Pursuant to Rule 11.4 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, ESI has filed motions for leave to file Exhibits G, H and K to its application as confidential materials under seal. ESI represents that the information is sensitive, and disclosure could place ESI at an unfair business disadvantage. We have granted similar requests in the past and do so here.

14. Categorization and Need for Hearings
In Resolution ALJ 176-3328, dated November 29, 2018, the Commission preliminarily categorized this application as ratesetting, and preliminarily determined that hearings were necessary. No party filed a protest to the application. On April 22, 2019, the assigned ALJ held a pre-hearing conference.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 17 -
On August 12, 2019, the assigned Commissioner issued a scoping memo stating no hearing was necessary, as no one had appeared to oppose ESI’s application.

Therefore, there will be no evidentiary hearing in this matter.

15. Waiver of Comment Period
This is an uncontested matter in which the decision grants the relief requested. Accordingly, pursuant to § 311(g)(2) of the Public Utilities Code and Rule 14.6(c)(2), the otherwise applicable 30-day period for public review and comment is waived.

16. Assignment of Proceeding
Liane Randolph is the assigned Commissioner and Charles Ferguson is the assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding.

Findings of Fact

1. ESI is a telephone corporation and a public utility as defined in Pub. Util.

Code § 234(a) and § 216(a).

2. ESI’s proposed construction activities appear to fall within one or more CEQA categorical exemptions.

3. ESI has a minimum of $100,000 of cash or cash equivalent that is reasonably liquid and readily available to meet its start-up expenses.

4. ESI has enough additional cash or cash equivalent to cover deposits that may be required by other telephone corporations in order to provide the proposed service.

5. ESI’s management possesses enough experience, knowledge, and technical expertise to provide local exchange services to the public.

6. No one associated with or employed by ESI as an affiliate, officer, director, partner, agent, or owner (directly or indirectly) of more than 10 percent of ESI, or anyone acting in a management capacity for ESI: (a) held one of these positions A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 18 -
with a company that filed for bankruptcy; (b) been personally found liable, or held one of these positions with a company that has been found liable, for fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; (c) been convicted of a felony; (d) been the subject of a criminal referral by judge or public agency; (e) had a telecommunications license or operating authority denied, suspended, revoked, or limited in any jurisdiction; (f) personally entered into a settlement, or held one of these positions with a company that has entered into settlement of criminal or civil claims involving violations of §§ 17000 et seq., §§ 17200 et seq., or §§ 17500 et seq. of the California Business & Professions Code, or of any other statute, regulation, or decisional law relating to fraud, dishonesty, failure to disclose, or misrepresentations to consumers or others; or (g) been found to have violated any statute, law, or rule pertaining to public utilities or other regulated industries; or (h) entered into any settlement agreements or made any voluntary payments or agreed to any other type of monetary forfeitures in resolution of any action by any regulatory body, agency, or attorney general.

7. To the best of ESI’s knowledge, neither ESI, or any affiliate, officer, director, partner, nor owner of more than 10 percent of ESI, or any person acting in such capacity whether or not formally appointed, is being, or has been investigated by the Federal Communications Commission or any law enforcement or regulatory agency for failure to comply with any law, rule or order.

8. ESI requested and is eligible for exemption from tariffing requirements and must observe the consumer protection rules adopted in D.98-08-031.

9. ESI provided a map of the location of its proposed service territory.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 19 -

10. ESI has no information to report under Rule 3.1(i), which requires that a utility filing an application under Pub. Util. Code §1001, provide a statement regarding compliance with GO 104-A, Section 2.

11. ESI provided an estimate of its customer base for the first and fifth year of operation.

12. Pursuant to Rule 11.4, ESI filed motions for leave to file confidential materials under seal, including Exhibits G, H and K to ESI’s application in this proceeding.

Conclusions of Law

1. ESI should be granted a CPCN to provide resold, full facilities-based local exchange telecommunications service in the service territories of AT&T California, Frontier California, Frontier Communications, Consolidated Communications and interexchange service in California, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Ordering Paragraphs.

2. ESI should be allowed to use the Energy Division 21-day CEQA exemption process.

3. ESI, once granted a CPCN, should be subject to the applicable Commission rules, decisions, General Orders, and statutes that pertain to California public utilities.

4. ESI should be granted an exemption from the requirement to file tariffs.

5. ESI’s motion to file under seal its Exhibits G, H and K to its application, should be granted for three years.

6. ESI should be granted non-dominant carrier status, subject to Commission rules and regulations as detailed in D.85-01-008 and modified in D.85-07-081 and D.85-11-044.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 20 -
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A certificate of public convenience and necessity is granted to ExteNet Services, Inc. to provide resold and competitive full facilities-based local exchange telecommunications services in the territories of Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California, Frontier California Inc., Citizens Telecommunications Company of California, Inc. d/b/a/ Frontier Communications of California, and Consolidated Communications of California Company, and interexchange service in California, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below.

2. The corporate identification number assigned to ExteNet Services, Inc., U7363C, must be included in the caption of all original filings with this Commission, and in the titles of other pleadings filed in existing cases.

3. ExteNet Services, Inc., must file, in this docket, a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding within 30 days of the effective date of this decision. Written acceptance filed in this docket does not reopen the proceeding.

4. The certificate granted by this decision will expire if not exercised within 12 months of the effective date of this decision.

5. ExteNet Services, Inc. must notify the Director of the Communications Division of the date that local exchange service is first rendered to the public, no later than five days after service first begins, by email to [email protected].

6. ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI) must obtain a performance bond of at least $25,000 in accordance with Decision 13-05-035. The performance bond must be a continuous bond (i.e., there is no termination date on the bond) issued by a corporate surety company authorized to transact surety business in California, A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 21 -
and the Commission must be listed as the obligee on the bond. Within five days of acceptance of its certificate of public convenience and necessity authority, ESI must submit a Tier-1 advice letter to the Communications Division, containing a copy of the license holder’s executed bond, and submit a Tier-1 advice letter annually, but not later than March 31, with a copy of the executed bond.

7. ExteNet Services, Inc. must not allow its performance bond to lapse during any period of its operation. Pursuant to Decision 13-05-035, the Commission may revoke a certificate of public convenience and necessity if a carrier is more than 120 days late in providing the Communications Division a copy of its executed performance bond and the carrier has not been granted an extension of time by the Communications Division.

8. In addition to all the requirements applicable to competitive local exchange carriers and interexchange carriers included in Attachments B, C, and D to this decision, ExteNet Services, Inc. is subject to the Consumer Protection Rules contained in General Order (GO) 168, and all applicable Commission rules, decisions, GOs, and statutes that pertain to California public utilities.

9. ExteNet Services, Inc. must pay the public purpose surcharges specified in Attachment B, and the Combined California Public Utilities Commission Telephone Surcharge Transmittal Form must be submitted even if the amount due is $0.

10. ExteNet Services, Inc. must pay an annual minimum user fee of $100 or

0.30 percent of gross intrastate revenue, whichever is greater. Under Public Utilities Code § 405, carriers that are in default of reporting and submitting user fees for a period of 30 days or more will be subject to penalties including suspension or revocation of their authority to operate in California.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 22 -

11. Prior to initiating service, ExteNet Services, Inc. must provide the Commission’s Consumer Affairs Branch with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated contact person(s) for purposes of resolving consumer complaints. This information must be updated if the name(s), address(es), or telephone number(s) change, or at least annually.

12. Prior to initiating service, ExteNet Services, Inc. must provide the Commission’s Communications Division with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated regulatory/official contact person(s). This information must be provided electronically, using the “Regulatory/Official Contact Information Update Request” found at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/communications. This information must be updated if the name or telephone number changes, or at least annually.

13. ExteNet Services, Inc. must submit an affiliate transaction report to the Director of the Communications Division, by e-mail to
[email protected], in compliance with Decision 93-02-019, on a calendar year basis using the form contained in Attachment D.

14. ExteNet Services, Inc. must submit an annual report to the Director of the Communications Division, by email to [email protected], in compliance with General Order 104-A, on a calendar-year basis with the information contained in Attachment C to this decision.

15. ExteNet Services, Inc. must apply for expanded authority to operate without Non-dominant Interexchange Carrier status prior to construction of full facilities.

16. The staff of the Commission’s Energy Division is authorized to review, process, and act upon ExteNet Services, Inc. ’s requests for a determination that A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 23 -
its full facilities-based construction activities are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

17. If ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI) wishes to engage in full facilities-based construction activities and believes that these activities are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, ESI shall first apply to the Commission’s Energy Division staff for a determination of exemption from California Environmental Quality Act by providing the Commission’s Energy Division (Energy Division) with:
a. A detailed description of the proposed project, including:
i. Customer(s) to be served;
ii. The precise location of the proposed construction
project; and
iii. Regional and local site maps.
b. A description of the environmental setting, including at a minimum:
i. Cultural, historical, and paleontological resources; ii. Biological resources; and
iii. Current land use and zoning.
c. A construction workplan, including:
i. Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Archaeological Resources;
ii. Commission Preconstruction Survey Checklist—
Biological Resources;
iii. A detailed schedule of construction activities, including site restoration activities;
iv. A description of construction/installation techniques; v. A list of other agencies contacted with respect to siting, land use planning, and environmental resource issues,
including contact information; and
vi. A list of permits required for the proposed project.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 24 -
d. A statement of the California Environmental Quality Act exemption(s) claimed to apply to the proposed project; and e. Documentation supporting the finding of exemption from California Environmental Quality Act.
f. The Energy Division will then review the submittal and notify ESI of either its approval or its denial of ESI’s claim for exemption from California Environmental Quality Act review within 21 days from the time that ESI’s submittal is complete.

18. If the Energy Division approves ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI’s) claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemption(s), the staff shall prepare a Notice to Proceed and file a Notice of Exemption with the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research. If the Energy Division disapproves ESI’s claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemptions, the staff shall issue to ESI a letter which states the specific reasons that the claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemptions do not apply to the proposed project.

19. If the Energy Division disapproves ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI’s) claimed California Environmental Quality Act exemption(s), ESI shall either re-design the specific project and facilities and then reapply for a finding of exemption from California Environmental Quality Act, or file a formal application with the Commission seeking the requisite approval and full California Environmental Quality Act review, before commencing any full facilities-based construction activities.

20. ExteNet Services, Inc. (ESI’s) motion to file under seal its Exhibits G, H and K is granted for a period of three years after the date of this decision. During this three-year period, this information shall not be publicly disclosed except on further Commission order or Administrative Law Judge ruling. If ESI believes that it is necessary for this information to remain under seal for longer than A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

- 25 -
three years, ESI may file a new motion showing good cause for extending this order by no later than 30 days before the expiration of this order.

21. Application 18-11-002 is closed.

This decision is effective today.

Dated September 26, 2019, 2019 at San Francisco, California.

MARYBEL BATJER
President
LIANE M. RANDOLPH

MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES

CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN

GENEVIEVE SHIROMA
Commissioners
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

ATTACHMENT A

This Attachment Is Intentionally Left Blank.

(END OF ATTACHMENT A)

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

1 ATTACHMENT B

REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO COMPETITIVE LOCAL EXCHANGE

CARRIERS AND INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS

1. Applicant must file, in this docket with reference to this decision number, a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding within 30 days of the effective date of this order. (Please note, written acceptance filed in this docket does not re-open the proceeding.)

2. The certificate granted and the authority to render service under the rates, charges, and rules authorized will expire if not exercised within 12 months of the date of this decision.

3. Applicant is subject to the following fees and surcharges that must be regularly remitted. Per the instructions in Exhibit E to Decision (D.) 00-10-028, the Combined California PUC Telephone Surcharge Transmittal Form must be submitted even if the amount due is $0.
a. The Universal Lifeline Telephone Service Trust
Administrative Committee Fund (Pub. Util. Code § 879);
b. The California Relay Service and Communications Devices Fund (Pub. Util. Code § 2881; D.98-12-073);
c. The California High Cost Fund-A (Pub. Util. Code § 739.3; D.96-10-066, at 3-4, App. B, Rule 1.C);

d. The California High Cost Fund-B (D.96-10-066, at 191, App. B, Rule 6.F.; D.07-12-054);
e. The California Advanced Services Fund (D.07-12-054); f. The California Teleconnect Fund (D.96-10-066, at 88, App. B, Rule 8.G);
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

2 g. The User Fee provided in Pub. Util. Code §§ 431-435. The minimum annual User Fee is $100, as set forth in
D.13-05-035.

Note: These fees change periodically. In compliance with Resolution T-16901, December 2, 2004, Applicant must check the joint tariff for surcharges and fees filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company (d/b/a AT&T California) and apply the current surcharge and fee amounts in that joint tariff on end-user bills until further revised. Current and historical surcharge rates can be found at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=1124.
i. Carriers must report and remit CPUC telephone
program surcharges online using the CPUC
Telecommunications and User Fees Filing System
(TUFFS). Information and instructions for online
reporting and payment of surcharges are available at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=1010. To
request a user ID and password for TUFFS online filing
and for questions, please e-mail
[email protected].
ii. Carriers must submit and pay the PUC User Fee (see
Item 3.g above) upon receiving the User Fee statement
sent by the Commission Instructions for reporting and
filing are available at
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=1009.

Please send an email to [email protected] for
additional questions regarding User Fee reporting and
payment.

4. If Applicant is a competitive local exchange carrier, the effectiveness of its future competitive local exchange carrier tariffs is subject to the requirements of General Order 96-B and the Telecommunications Industry Rules (D.07-09-019).

5. If Applicant is a non-dominant interexchange carrier, the effectiveness of its future non-dominant interexchange carrier tariffs is subject to the requirement of General Order 96-B and the Telecommunications Industry Rules (D.07-09-019).

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

3 6. Tariff filings must reflect all fees and surcharges to which Applicant is subject, as reflected in Item 3, above.

7. Applicant must obtain a performance bond of at least $25,000 in accordance with Decision 13-05-035. The performance bond must be a continuous bond (i.e., there is no termination date on the bond) issued by a corporate surety company authorized to transact surety business in California, and the Commission must be listed as the obligee on the bond. Within five days of acceptance of its certificate of public convenience and necessity authority, Applicant must submit a Tier-1 Advice Letter to the Communications Division, containing a copy of the license holder’s executed bond, and submit a Tier-1 advice letter annually, but not later than March 31, with a copy of the executed bond.

8. Applicant must not allow its performance bond to lapse during any period of its operation. Pursuant to Decision 13-05-035, the Commission may revoke a certificate of public convenience and necessity if a carrier is more than 120 days late in providing the Communications Division a copy of its executed performance bond and the carrier has not been granted an extension of time by the Communications Division.

9. Applicants providing local exchange service must submit a service area map as part of their initial tariff to the Communications Division.

10. Prior to initiating service, Applicant must provide the Commission’s Consumer Affairs Branch with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated contact person(s) for purposes of resolving consumer complaints. This information must be updated if the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) change, or at least annually.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

4 11. In addition, Applicant must provide the Commission’s Communications Division with the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of its designated regulatory/official contact persons(s). This information must be provided electronically, using the “Regulatory/Official Contact Information Update Request” found at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/communications. This information must be updated if the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) change, or at least annually.

12. Applicant must notify the Director of the Communications Division, in writing submitted by email to [email protected], no later than five days after service first begins, of the date that local exchange service is first rendered to the public.

13. Applicant must keep its books and records in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

14. In the event Applicant’s books and records are required for inspection by the Commission or its staff, it must either produce such records at the Commission’s offices or reimburse the Commission for the reasonable costs incurred in having Commission staff travel to its office.

15. Applicant must submit an annual report to the Director of the Communications Division at [email protected], in compliance with GO 104-A, on a calendar-year basis with the information contained in Attachment C to this decision.

16. Applicant must submit an affiliate transaction report to the Director of the Communications Division at [email protected], in compliance with D.93-02-019, on a calendar-year basis using the form contained in Attachment D.

17. Applicant must ensure that its employees comply with the provisions of Pub. Util. Code § 2889.5 regarding solicitation of customers.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

5 18. Within 60 days of the effective date of this order, Applicant must comply with Pub. Util. Code § 708, Employee Identification Cards, and notify the Director of the Communications Division of its compliance in writing, by email to [email protected].

19. If Applicant is 90 days or more late in submitting an annual report, or in remitting the surcharges and fee listed in Item 3 above, and has not received written permission from the Communications Division to file or remit late, the Communications Division must prepare for Commission consideration a resolution that revokes Applicant’s CPCN.

20. Applicant is exempt from Rule 3.1(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.

21. Applicant is exempt from Pub. Util. Code §§ 816-830, and 851.

22. If Applicant decides to discontinue service or file for bankruptcy, it must immediately notify the Communications Division’s Bankruptcy Coordinator.

23. Applicant must send a copy of this decision to concerned local permitting agencies no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

(END OF ATTACHMENT B)
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

1 ATTACHMENT C

ANNUAL REPORT
An original and a machine readable, copy using Microsoft Word or compatible format must be submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, Communications Division, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102-3298, no later than March 31st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted. In addition, an electronic copy of the report must be emailed to [email protected].

Failure to submit this information on time may result in a penalty as provided for in Pub. Util. Code §§ 2107 and 2108.

Required information:

1. Exact legal name and U # of the reporting utility.

2. Address.

3. Name, title, address, and telephone number of the person to be contacted concerning the reported information.

4. Name and title of the officer having custody of the general books of account and the address of the office where such books are kept.

5. Type of organization (e.g., corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.).

If incorporated, specify:
a. Date of filing articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State. b. State in which incorporated.

6. Number and date of the Commission decision granting the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity.

7. Date operations were begun.

8. Description of other business activities in which the utility is engaged.

9. List of all affiliated companies and their relationship to the utility. State if affiliate is a:
a. Regulated public utility.
b. Publicly held corporation.

10. Balance sheet as of December 31st of the year for which information is submitted.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

2 11. Income statement for California operations for the calendar year for which information is submitted.

12. Cash Flow statement as of December 31st of the calendar year for which information is submitted, for California operations only.

For any questions concerning this report, please send an email to [email protected] with a subject line that includes: “CD Annual Reports.”

(END OF ATTACHMENT C)
A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

1 ATTACHMENT D

CALENDAR YEAR AFFILIATE TRANSACTION REPORT
An original and a machine readable, copy using Microsoft Word and Excel, or compatible format must be submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission, Communications Division, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102-3298, no later than May 1st of the year following the calendar year for which the annual report is submitted. In addition, an electronic copy of the report must be emailed to [email protected].

1. Each utility must list and provide the following information for each affiliated entity and regulated subsidiary that the utility had during the period covered by the Annual Affiliate Transaction Report.
 Form of organization (e.g., corporation, partnership, joint venture, strategic alliance, etc.);
 Brief description of business activities engaged in;
 Relationship to the utility (e.g., controlling corporation, subsidiary, regulated subsidiary, affiliate);
 Ownership of the utility (including type and percent
ownership)
 Voting rights held by the utility and percent; and
 Corporate officers.

2. The utility must prepare and submit a corporate organization chart showing any and all corporate relationships between the utility and its affiliated entities and regulated subsidiaries in Item 1 above. The chart must have the controlling corporation (if any) at the top of the chart, the utility and any subsidiaries and/or affiliates of the controlling corporation in the middle levels of the chart, and all secondary subsidiaries and affiliates (e.g., a subsidiary that in turn is owned by another subsidiary and/or affiliate) in the lower levels. Any regulated subsidiary must be clearly noted.

A.18-11-002 ALJ/CFG/avs/lil

2 3. For a utility that has individuals who are classified as “controlling corporations” of the competitive utility, the utility must only report under the requirements of Items 1 and 2 above any affiliated entity that either (a) is a public utility or (b) transacts any business with the utility filing the annual report excluding the provision of tariff services.

4. Each annual report must be signed by a corporate officer of the utility stating under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California (CCP 2015.5) that the annual report is complete and accurate with no material omissions.

5. Any required material that a utility is unable to provide must be reasonably described and the reasons the data cannot be obtained, as well as the efforts expended to obtain the information, must be set forth in the utility’s Annual Affiliate Transaction Report and verified in accordance with Section I-F of Decision 93-02-019.

6. Utilities that do not have affiliated entities must submit, in lieu of the annual transaction report, an annual statement to the Commission stating that the utility had no affiliated entities during the report period. This statement must be signed by a corporate officer of the utility, stating under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California (CCP 2015.5) that the annual report is complete and accurate with no material omissions.

For any questions concerning this report, please send an email to [email protected] with a subject line that includes: “CD Annual Reports.”

(END OF ATTACHMENT D)
Reference Copy
Conditions:

Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606.

LICENSEE:

ATTN: REGULATORY

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
5055 NORTH POINT PKWY, NP2NE NETWORK ENGINEERING
ALPHARETTA, GA 30022

LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0002963817
Site Information:

Call Sign File Number
Radio Service
Market Numer
KNKA209
CL - Cellular
CMA002
Sub-Market Designator
0 Channel Block
B
Market Name
Los Angeles-Long Beach/Anaheim
Grant Date
08-26-2014
Effective Date
11-01-2016
Expiration Date
10-01-2024
Print DateFive Yr Build-Out Date
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION
Federal Communications Commission
6 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-56-38.2 N 116-53-37.3 W 915.0 51.2 1011029
Address: 1999 8TH STREET
City: BANNING County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-668.200
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-417.800 269.800 -7.400 64.200 272.000 202.300 -88.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

91.830 91.830 91.830 91.830 91.830 91.830 91.830 91.830 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

REFERENCE COPY
This is not an official FCC license. It is a record of public information contained in the FCC's licensing database on the date that this reference copy was generated. In cases where FCC rules require the presentation, posting, or display of an FCC license, this document may not be used in place of an official FCC license.

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

10 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-30-25.0 N 117-54-06.3 W 926.8 33.5
Address: 12747 PEARBLOSSOM HIGHWAY
City: Pearblossom County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
116.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

94.400 -29.400 -328.400 -564.200 -289.100 -8.200 133.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
11 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-08-51.0 N 118-41-54.3 W 234.4 21.3
Address: 4937 LAS VIRGENES ROAD
City: CALABASAS County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
-160.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-26.900 -90.200 -182.500 42.000 -144.500 -34.300 184.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

93.330 93.330 93.330 93.330 93.330 93.330 93.330 93.330 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
12 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-52-01.1 N 116-26-03.0 W 476.1 37.2
Address: 70500 VARNER RD.

City: DESERT HOT SPRINGS County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-61.800
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-211.400 183.500 419.200 366.400 352.700 234.700 214.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.800 28.840 91.200 85.110 24.550 2.750 0.200 0.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-61.800
Antenna: 6
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-211.400 183.500 419.200 366.400 352.700 234.700 214.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.580 0.100 0.100 2.370 15.660 31.940 25.130 6.090
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-61.800
Antenna: 7
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-211.400 183.500 419.200 366.400 352.700 234.700 214.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 159.760 78.440 12.150 0.700 0.400 2.370 30.450 125.700
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

14 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-31-47.0 N 118-08-42.3 W 1334.0 42.7
Address: 35660 VISTA VIEW TERRACE
City: PALMDALE County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
566.300
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
578.400 482.000 143.100 268.300 476.600 313.000 379.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

43.010 42.930 29.600 14.430 38.260 24.800 7.300 29.950
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
15 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-36-37.1 N 117-17-17.3 W 1376.6 27.4
Address: 17232 ORO GRANDE PEAK ROAD
City: VICTORVILLE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
454.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
339.700 434.200 487.100 535.000 507.100 549.400 571.400 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

60.630 56.330 17.180 0.590 0.240 0.240 0.820 23.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
455.400
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
340.500 434.900 487.700 535.600 507.700 550.000 572.000 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.240 0.490 6.630 27.690 47.610 40.110 14.060 1.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
16 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-23-11.0 N 118-19-47.2 W 1481.3 30.5
Address: 11005 SANTA CLARA DIVIDE RD., 8 MI N OF
City: LOS ANGELES County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
738.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
640.900 78.900 506.700 856.500 908.500 872.400 901.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

87.060 100.090 74.220 12.600 0.290 3.640 43.660 101.550 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

17 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-49-38.0 N 116-57-15.0 W 1083.0 15.5
Address: 40480 SOBOBA ROAD
City: SAN JACINTO County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
325.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
245.500 -151.100 487.000 580.100 623.300 604.100 487.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.200 0.510 7.560 24.990 25.340 22.840 5.030 0.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
325.900
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
245.500 -151.100 487.000 580.100 623.300 604.100 487.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.480 0.100 0.100 0.280 3.840 10.190 10.010 8.530
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
19 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-05-06.0 N 118-46-57.3 W 842.4 16.8
Address: 1953 LATIGO CANYON ROAD
City: MALIBU County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
457.000
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
528.300 404.700 722.400 615.600 591.600 449.600 520.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

16.000 4.020 0.380 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.330 3.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
23 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-48-09.9 N 118-48-53.3 W 1485.0 31.1
Address: Gorman Peak Site 37411 GORMAN POST ROAD
City: GORMAN County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
493.200
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
130.500 522.900 363.600 531.400 265.600 -158.700 438.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.540 4.110 215.770 27.160 1.560 0.540 0.540 0.540
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
493.200
Antenna: 6
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
130.500 522.900 363.600 531.400 265.600 -158.700 438.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.480 0.480 1.010 6.830 242.180 6.230 0.920 0.480
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
493.200
Antenna: 7
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
130.500 522.900 363.600 531.400 265.600 -158.700 438.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.560 0.540 0.540 0.540 0.540 4.110 215.770 27.160
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

24 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-15-54.0 N 117-10-08.1 W 1620.3 13.4
Address: 29101 Hospital Road
City: Lake Arrowhead County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
309.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

0.000 -283.100 -77.700 553.300 602.400 233.100 388.000
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
28 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-31-32.1 N 115-56-38.0 W -64.0 31.7
Address: 98775 HIGHWAY 111
City: MECCA County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-334.700
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-474.700 -122.900 24.800 37.100 32.100 31.800 -53.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

10.230 0.950 0.200 0.350 3.390 33.110 95.500 63.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-334.700
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-474.700 -122.900 24.800 37.100 32.100 31.800 -53.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.180 18.960 137.390 250.000 99.530 12.530 1.070 0.500
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
29 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-46-17.1 N 118-22-10.3 W 272.2 15.5
Address: 734 SILVER SPUR ROAD
City: ROLLING HILLS County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
247.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
263.800 256.200 80.700 282.000 142.000 176.100 266.400
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

6.680 6.680 6.680 6.680 6.680 6.680 6.680 6.680
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

31 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-23-12.1 N 118-24-08.6 W 479.2 39.7
Address: 5 miles NW of Avalon, ON BLACK JACK MTN.

City: Santa Catalina ISLAN County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
472.000
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
473.800 478.100 157.500 383.600 196.000 365.500 282.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.100 0.100 0.960 1.740 0.240 0.100 0.100 0.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
472.000
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
473.800 478.100 157.500 383.600 196.000 365.500 282.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.690 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.380 1.950
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
32 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-39-19.1 N 115-27-12.9 W 1147.8 35.7
Address: CHUCKWALLA CELL SITE: 6 MILES SW OF
City: DESERT CENTER County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
851.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
909.500 545.300 242.600 479.000 655.200 690.100 569.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

34.990 34.990 34.990 34.990 34.990 34.990 34.990 34.990 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
34 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-54-53.1 N 117-31-27.4 W 997.9 25.9
Address: KRAMER HILLS ROAD AND HIGHWAY 395
City: 5 MI S OF KRAMER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
242.800
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
265.900 246.000 150.000 146.300 114.200 118.300 219.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.200 0.840 11.380 81.100 57.810 6.110 0.320 0.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
242.800
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
265.900 246.000 150.000 146.300 114.200 118.300 219.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.200 0.860 48.980 34.670 0.870 0.200 0.200 0.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
242.800
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
265.900 246.000 150.000 146.300 114.200 118.300 219.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

70.790 68.230 8.260 0.410 0.200 0.200 0.780 8.430
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

36 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-36-20.1 N 114-54-07.9 W 118.6 53.0
Address: WILEYS WELL ROAD AND INTERSTATE 10
City: 14 M. W. OF BLYTHE County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-98.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-118.400 24.600 -35.200 0.200 1.000 45.700 39.500
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
37 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-26-09.9 N 115-55-29.0 W 1354.2 40.5
Address: TURQUOISE MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS CELL SITE: 14 MILES NORTHEAST OF City: BAKER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
360.700
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
223.700 176.800 312.300 610.900 621.100 701.400 470.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
38 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-42-36.0 N 116-09-07.0 W 634.0 60.7
Address: 25255 BAGDAD CHASE ROAD; 3 MI S OF
City: LUDLOW County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
255.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

63.800 81.700 151.500 25.100 -88.300 35.600 71.400
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
39 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-50-05.0 N 114-37-03.0 W 186.2 34.7 1025847
Address: 1111 BAILEY AVE
City: NEEDLES County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:

67.300
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

22.600 27.900 67.800 -91.000 -244.700 -271.000 -51.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 157.770 22.540 1.120 0.400 0.400 1.240 12.740 120.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

39 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-50-05.0 N 114-37-03.0 W 186.2 34.7 1025847
Address: 1111 BAILEY AVE
City: NEEDLES County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:

67.300
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

22.600 27.900 67.800 -91.000 -244.700 -271.000 -51.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.400 1.600 22.750 162.190 115.620 12.220 0.640 0.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

67.300
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

22.600 27.900 67.800 -91.000 -244.700 -271.000 -51.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.040 0.400 0.830 7.910 72.620 196.800 110.160 15.140
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
40 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-09-11.6 N 116-23-22.4 W 1156.1 24.4 1263982
Address: Yucca Valley Site 58399 Serin Drive
City: YUCCA VALLEY County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
194.400
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
270.600 356.000 110.600 -53.900 154.300 -106.700 -1.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.780 49.430 311.890 159.960 10.570 1.390 0.680 0.680
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
194.400
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
270.600 356.000 110.600 -53.900 154.300 -106.700 -1.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.360 0.680 0.680 3.500 35.810 284.450 196.790 14.930
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
194.400
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
270.600 356.000 110.600 -53.900 154.300 -106.700 -1.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 319.150 58.080 4.610 0.710 0.680 0.680 10.090 156.310
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
41 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-39-17.7 N 115-59-10.8 W 560.0 38.4
Address: INTERSTATE 10, 12 MILES EAST OF
City: INDIO County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-249.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-376.300 189.300 272.700 507.000 541.900 491.700 229.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.100 0.100 0.160 2.400 14.390 7.620 0.770 0.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

41 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-39-17.7 N 115-59-10.8 W 560.0 38.4
Address: INTERSTATE 10, 12 MILES EAST OF
City: INDIO County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-249.500
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-376.300 189.300 272.700 507.000 541.900 491.700 229.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

30.760 2.470 0.200 0.200 0.200 1.770 25.230 99.770
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
42 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-19-26.8 N 117-37-05.2 W 998.5 25.6
Address: .4 MILES WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY 395 4 MILES SOUTH OF JOHANNESBURG City: SAN BERNARDINO County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:

0.100
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-127.300 173.100 106.600 116.800 64.100 -36.500 68.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

30.900 144.890 195.450 85.320 12.330 0.800 0.400 2.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

0.100
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-127.300 173.100 106.600 116.800 64.100 -36.500 68.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.150 15.170 100.240 200.000 132.140 24.610 2.240 0.400 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
43 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-07-57.9 N 116-12-23.1 W 468.8 34.7
Address: RASOR ROAD AND INTERSTATE 15 16 MILES SOUTHWEST OF City: BAKER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
-195.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
115.600 158.900 177.300 113.600 118.000 146.900 -272.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 183.670 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

44 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-40-53.1 N 115-14-52.9 W 220.7 49.8
Address: CORN SPRINGS ROAD & INTERSTATE 10 9 MILES EAST OF DESERT CENTER City: Corn Springs County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
127.000
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

40.100 131.000 61.800 -133.600 -362.100 -99.600 89.600
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
45 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-29-37.1 N 116-47-42.0 W 1136.0 25.6
Address: 43395 MCCAIN LANE; 5 MILES NE OF
City: AGUANGA County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
-65.300
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-42.700 -98.200 -165.800 131.300 372.900 554.800 287.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.940 106.640 79.060 2.080 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-65.300
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-42.700 -98.200 -165.800 131.300 372.900 554.800 287.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.650 0.340 0.340 0.340 0.710 4.790 169.820 4.370
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
46 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-27-10.9 N 116-35-41.1 W 1603.0 26.2 1215044
Address: Fort Irwin Military Base
City: Fort Irwin County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
659.700
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
503.700 552.800 657.000 724.400 627.500 595.200 719.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.960 4.300 49.710 106.690 33.400 3.890 0.610 0.610
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
659.700
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
503.700 552.800 657.000 724.400 627.500 595.200 719.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.440 0.890 0.610 0.700 4.240 82.600 306.890 92.680
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
659.700
Antenna: 6
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
503.700 552.800 657.000 724.400 627.500 595.200 719.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 125.500 153.290 39.110 0.430 0.430 0.430 0.430 13.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

47 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-04-48.0 N 114-46-45.0 W 277.7 60.7 1030851
Address: STATE HIGHWAY 62
City: RICE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
-162.100
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

3.500 -20.100 65.300 115.700 98.800 63.200 65.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.950 5.410 0.680 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.780 6.650
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-162.100
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

3.500 -20.100 65.300 115.700 98.800 63.200 -65.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.400 0.780 6.650 200.950 5.410 0.680 0.400 0.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
48 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-10-45.1 N 114-34-04.9 W 269.8 53.0
Address: 4200 STATE HIGHWAY 95
City: VIDAL JUNCTION County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
-103.400
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-72.300 65.200 134.100 51.000 26.400 -35.500 -43.200
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

5.330 80.350 357.270 341.190 69.500 6.580 0.860 0.860
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-103.400
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-72.300 65.200 134.100 51.000 26.400 -35.500 -43.200
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.230 1.080 1.080 13.900 173.780 540.750 130.920 9.820
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-103.400
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-72.300 65.200 134.100 51.000 26.400 -35.500 -43.200
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 427.560 61.090 3.040 1.080 1.080 3.370 34.510 327.340
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
49 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-28-42.0 N 114-24-59.8 W 175.7 53.0
Address: 12121 Malamedia Rd.

City: HAVASU LAKE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:

62.100
Antenna: 7
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-41.700 -25.600 23.800 -147.000 -70.800 -116.100 -221.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

55.790 65.260 36.320 5.710 0.490 0.370 2.880 21.870
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

49 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-28-42.0 N 114-24-59.8 W 175.7 53.0
Address: 12121 Malamedia Rd.

City: HAVASU LAKE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:

62.100
Antenna: 8
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-41.700 -25.600 23.800 -147.000 -70.800 -116.100 -221.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.730 11.170 42.900 65.740 53.820 16.090 1.850 0.370
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

62.100
Antenna: 9
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-41.700 -25.600 23.800 -147.000 -70.800 -116.100 -221.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.630 0.350 0.350 0.350 1.240 44.920 170.780 50.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
50 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-38-38.9 N 116-37-36.0 W 1815.7 37.8
Address: 21411 CAMP ROCK ROAD 15 MILES SOUTH OF NEWBERRY SPRINGS City: Newberry Springs County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
824.700
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
743.900 677.300 839.400 833.100 662.000 512.600 548.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.400 0.400 0.400 1.260 38.110 191.000 76.040 3.320
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
824.700
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
743.900 677.300 839.400 833.100 662.000 512.600 548.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 186.650 31.700 1.050 0.400 0.400 0.500 3.480 83.370
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
824.700
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
743.900 677.300 839.400 833.100 662.000 512.600 548.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.910 14.830 144.890 141.590 12.050 0.940 0.400 0.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
51 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-14-12.0 N 115-25-24.0 W 1471.6 42.1
Address: CIMA ROAD AND RANCH ROAD 4.5 MILES EAST OF
City: CIMA County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
417.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
269.400 -214.300 -119.100 -157.300 302.100 121.100 119.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.120 9.350 77.810 195.450 129.130 25.180 3.030 0.490
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

51 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-14-12.0 N 115-25-24.0 W 1471.6 42.1
Address: CIMA ROAD AND RANCH ROAD 4.5 MILES EAST OF
City: CIMA County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
417.900
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
269.400 -214.300 -119.100 -157.300 302.100 121.100 119.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.960 0.470 3.170 26.980 135.220 186.650 70.960 8.730
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
417.900
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
269.400 -214.300 -119.100 -157.300 302.100 121.100 119.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 195.450 138.370 31.700 3.640 1.050 5.510 44.770 151.720 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
52 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-07-59.0 N 116-03-59.0 W 680.3 29.3
Address: 73195 CACTUS DRIVE
City: TWENTYNINE PALMS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
134.700
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
155.500 139.300 -190.300 -632.400 -495.000 -49.300 23.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
53 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-52-50.7 N 115-04-05.9 W 1097.6 30.5
Address: GOFF'S BUTTE CELL SITE: 3.7 MILES NORTH OF I-40; .5 MILES WEST OF

MOUNTAIN SPRI
City: GOFFS BUTTE County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
250.200
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
340.200 397.500 375.600 176.300 416.300 380.300 233.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

55 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-45-58.8 N 116-19-43.0 W 453.0 20.7
Address: (IBEX site) STATE HIGHWAY 127, 35 MILES NW OF
City: BAKER County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
-83.200
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-87.600 -16.900 191.800 269.700 270.300 212.000 -397.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 224.790 93.710 5.780 0.890 0.460 0.460 8.550 110.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-83.200
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-87.600 -16.900 191.800 269.700 270.300 212.000 -397.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.460 4.190 57.780 224.790 159.140 17.450 1.130 0.460
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
56 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-18-34.1 N 114-09-55.8 W 523.8 6.1
Address: BLACK METAL MT. COMMUN. SITE; 2 MI NW OF
City: PARKER DAM County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
220.200
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

94.400 251.600 185.000 304.800 249.100 0.000 345.600
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.100 0.800 0.800 1.260 16.290 235.500 296.480 25.230
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
57 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-14-23.8 N 116-44-47.4 W 1098.8 26.2 1215047
Address: (FT IRWIN) Gate of Fort Irwin Military Base
City: Fort Irwin County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
128.000
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
283.200 378.100 281.200 362.300 130.800 -56.000 83.500
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.570 7.300 91.300 284.110 68.780 5.160 0.650 0.570
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
128.000
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
283.200 378.100 281.200 362.300 130.800 -56.000 83.500
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

91.300 284.110 68.780 5.160 0.650 0.570 0.570 7.300
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
128.000
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
283.200 378.100 281.200 362.300 130.800 -56.000 83.500
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

42.310 2.270 0.570 0.570 1.200 13.660 141.740 251.470
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

59 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-37-03.0 N 114-46-23.0 W 247.6 37.2 1048302
Address: LOWER MCCOY PEAK
City: BLYTHE County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
112.500
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
147.100 183.600 192.400 161.700 129.300 144.200 -158.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
62 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-07-14.0 N 115-46-07.9 W 399.6 54.3
Address: 14 MILES E OF TWENTYNINE PALMS; STATE HWY 62 (29 PALMS HWY); ASSESORS

PARCEL NUM
City: TWENTYNINE PALMS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
-105.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-127.200 42.200 -239.300 -136.200 -226.200 -16.000 36.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
63 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-45-00.0 N 114-31-28.8 W 204.3 9.8
Address: BIG MARIA COMMUNIUCATIONS SITE, 11 MILES N OF BLYTHE, OFF HIGHWAY 95 City: RIVERSIDE County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
121.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
107.700 76.400 71.900 129.400 108.800 -49.800 -150.000
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

96.160 2.640 0.290 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.440 6.710
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
64 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-37-47.0 N 116-14-22.0 W -17.3 33.5
Address: 81600 Avenue 58
City: La Quinta County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:

3.200
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-7.600 35.200 44.400 -315.900 -942.000 -454.200 -44.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.380 0.400 0.400 1.320 12.050 117.770 151.720 17.830
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

64 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-37-47.0 N 116-14-22.0 W -17.3 33.5
Address: 81600 Avenue 58
City: La Quinta County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:

3.200
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-7.600 35.200 44.400 -315.900 -942.000 -454.200 -44.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 244.310 137.390 11.690 0.790 0.690 2.280 51.040 233.310 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

3.200
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-7.600 35.200 44.400 -315.900 -942.000 -454.200 -44.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.560 49.090 200.000 53.830 4.200 0.560 0.400 0.780
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
79 Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-31-07.0 N 115-08-45.0 W 1327.4 15.9
Address: OLD WOMAN CELL SITE 1.69 MILES SOUTH OF SNFLWR SPRING SPUR, 18.1 MILES E
City: OLD WOMAN County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
323.300
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
522.400 690.400 645.800 574.600 395.800 574.700 224.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 150.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 150.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
118
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-09-02.0 N 115-08-25.0 W 570.0 53.0
Address: IRON MOUNTAINS CELL SITE 1.19 MILES WEST OF IRON MTN PUMPING ROAD 4.9

MILES N
City: IRON MOUNTAINS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
400.400
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
405.100 411.700 358.100 222.400 150.900 176.500 287.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.680 23.120 210.860 319.150 80.170 2.910 0.680 0.680
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
400.400
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
405.100 411.700 358.100 222.400 150.900 176.500 287.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.360 0.860 2.190 23.010 188.360 430.530 202.770 25.180 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

118
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-09-02.0 N 115-08-25.0 W 570.0 53.0
Address: IRON MOUNTAINS CELL SITE 1.19 MILES WEST OF IRON MTN PUMPING ROAD 4.9

MILES N
City: IRON MOUNTAINS County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
400.400
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
405.100 411.700 358.100 222.400 150.900 176.500 287.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 859.010 22.590 1.710 1.710 1.710 1.710 1.710 34.990
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
128
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-34-43.7 N 117-42-30.5 W 808.0 40.2
Address: 2600 S. China Lake Blvd.

City: Ridgecrest County: KERN State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-14-2007 141.100
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
108.400 -42.300 -137.800 -238.800 -157.600 11.800 95.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 369.910 307.680 25.010 1.000 1.040 1.000 1.000 36.150
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
141.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
108.400 -42.300 -137.800 -238.800 -157.600 11.800 95.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.000 1.990 95.080 487.640 165.230 11.700 1.000 1.000
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
141.100
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
108.400 -42.300 -137.800 -238.800 -157.600 11.800 95.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

5.350 1.000 1.000 1.000 10.190 222.900 455.090 68.880
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
132
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-59-12.1 N 118-09-45.3 W 40.8 33.8
Address: 5701 S Eastern Ave
City: City of Commerce County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
-73.900
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-22.300 -55.700 33.300 43.100 37.200 18.400 -24.000
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.160 1.370 1.890 1.740 1.130 0.120 0.100 0.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-73.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-22.300 -55.700 33.300 43.100 37.200 18.400 -24.000
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.100 0.100 0.100 0.390 1.830 1.830 1.740 0.610
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

132
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-59-12.1 N 118-09-45.3 W 40.8 33.8
Address: 5701 S Eastern Ave
City: City of Commerce County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline:
-73.900
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-22.300 -55.700 33.300 43.100 37.200 18.400 -24.000
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.800 1.560 0.270 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.850 1.860
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
133
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-52-52.0 N 117-36-18.0 W 198.1 28.0 1011242
Address: (CORONA II) 519 MAPLE STREET
City: CORONA County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:

30.700
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

21.300 -29.100 -82.300 -476.400 -256.800 63.500 31.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

4.140 32.530 106.140 96.220 25.270 3.190 0.330 0.330
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

30.700
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

21.300 -29.100 -82.300 -476.400 -256.800 63.500 31.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.720 0.330 1.210 9.430 59.740 146.100 77.290 13.540
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

30.700
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

21.300 -29.100 -82.300 -476.400 -256.800 63.500 31.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

71.570 52.490 13.320 1.450 0.330 0.900 9.410 45.890
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
139
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-08-21.4 N 117-14-16.4 W 1190.9 15.2
Address: 195 Black Canyon Rd
City: Hinkley County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline:
213.500
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
241.000 268.000 395.900 568.000 560.000 414.200 223.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

140
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-36-07.4 N 117-20-38.8 W 1071.4 36.8
Address: 35603 Main Divide Truck Trail
City: Lake Elsinore County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline:
658.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
659.400 646.700 513.800 459.600 548.000 485.600 209.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.110 1.290 5.600 5.530 1.090 0.100 0.100 0.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
658.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
659.400 646.700 513.800 459.600 548.000 485.600 209.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

5.020 15.200 5.450 0.330 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.390
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
141
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-04-44.5 N 115-20-04.8 W 364.9 47.2
Address: 8 miles West of Hwy 177 (1A)
City: 29 Palms County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 08-18-2009 181.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

40.100 41.700 90.400 -260.600 -334.300 -219.800 -75.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

33.220 2.640 1.070 1.070 3.480 39.010 390.070 372.510
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
181.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

40.100 41.700 90.400 -260.600 -334.300 -219.800 -75.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.760 30.980 309.840 295.900 26.370 2.090 0.850 0.850
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
142
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-09-34.2 N 117-54-29.9 W 230.3 15.8
Address: 1964 N. San Gabriel Canyon Rd.

City: Azusa County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 -642.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-395.900 -358.700 -6.300 88.100 124.300 -36.300 -802.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

5.020 63.170 186.420 61.730 4.900 0.400 0.400 0.490
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-642.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-395.900 -358.700 -6.300 88.100 124.300 -36.300 -802.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.400 0.400 0.400 3.550 50.170 182.170 77.710 6.930
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

143
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-09-11.6 N 117-39-06.1 W 601.2 7.1
Address: 2426 N. Euclid Avenue
City: Upland County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 -1293.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-1039.300 68.300 249.300 281.800 247.900 -30.300 -481.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.680 58.300 226.820 56.980 4.130 0.450 0.450 0.450
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-1293.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-1039.300 68.300 249.300 281.800 247.900 -30.300 -481.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

4.130 0.450 0.450 0.450 1.680 58.300 226.820 56.980
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-1293.800
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-1039.300 68.300 249.300 281.800 247.900 -30.300 -481.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 226.820 56.980 4.130 0.450 0.450 0.450 1.680 58.300
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
144
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-11-04.0 N 118-07-55.3 W 372.8 11.3
Address: 2235 N. Lake Avenue
City: Altadena County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 -784.300
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-874.500 -285.000 221.400 209.600 172.300 10.300 -585.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

62.010 6.060 0.460 0.460 1.270 11.550 83.640 225.130
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-784.300
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-874.600 -285.000 221.400 209.600 172.300 10.300 -585.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

83.820 225.590 62.130 6.070 0.460 0.460 1.270 11.570
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
146
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-30-05.5 N 117-45-29.8 W 1026.0 23.2
Address: 20719 East Avenue V13
City: Palmdale County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 179.900
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
121.600 14.800 -265.300 -642.400 -252.800 76.300 173.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.220 21.170 127.550 156.920 22.170 2.600 0.380 0.380
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

146
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-30-05.5 N 117-45-29.8 W 1026.0 23.2
Address: 20719 East Avenue V13
City: Palmdale County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 179.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
121.600 14.800 -265.300 -642.400 -252.800 76.300 173.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

4.950 0.380 0.380 1.030 9.430 68.310 183.860 50.640
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
179.900
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
121.600 14.800 -265.300 -642.400 -252.800 76.300 173.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 160.130 118.710 13.020 0.780 0.380 0.480 3.670 29.820
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
147
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-21-51.5 N 117-38-00.8 W 1899.0 20.4
Address: 1255 Rivera Dr.

City: Wrightwood County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 06-26-2010 677.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
636.900 518.400 342.200 -365.500 181.400 -269.800 357.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.450 2.850 74.900 216.010 43.100 3.120 0.450 0.450
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
677.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
636.900 518.400 342.200 -365.500 181.400 -269.800 357.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.470 0.450 0.450 16.430 168.150 139.860 11.370 0.450
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
677.600
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
636.900 518.400 342.200 -0.300 181.400 -269.800 357.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

6.680 0.450 0.450 0.450 0.490 31.950 211.100 92.150
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
149
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-46-58.5 N 116-45-19.1 W 1763.6 23.8
Address: Hwy. 243, 1/4 Mile South of Round Robin Dr.

City: Idyllwild County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 464.900
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
163.700 -147.500 125.100 444.300 932.400 938.800 399.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.520 4.640 71.940 146.890 26.730 2.120 0.520 0.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

149
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-46-58.5 N 116-45-19.1 W 1763.6 23.8
Address: Hwy. 243, 1/4 Mile South of Round Robin Dr.

City: Idyllwild County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 464.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
163.700 -347.500 125.100 444.300 932.400 938.800 399.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 157.390 47.530 1.770 0.520 0.520 0.520 2.170 42.360
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
150
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-33-55.5 N 116-32-39.3 W 1426.9 27.4
Address: Hwy 74 Near Santa Rosa Rd.

City: Mountain Center County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 135.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
290.100 42.600 -143.300 403.200 148.000 144.700 3.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

4.640 71.940 146.890 26.730 2.120 0.520 0.520 0.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
135.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
290.100 42.600 -143.300 403.200 148.000 144.700 3.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.120 0.520 0.520 0.520 4.640 71.940 146.890 26.730
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
135.800
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
290.100 42.600 -143.300 403.200 148.000 144.700 3.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.520 0.520 2.170 42.360 157.390 47.530 1.770 0.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
151
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-57-39.4 N 114-31-21.2 W 118.3 45.7
Address: I-95 (40480 Soboba Rd.)
City: Desert Center County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010 -166.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

53.300 46.000 55.300 62.700 -125.300 -82.200 -200.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 210.380 200.910 17.910 1.420 0.580 0.580 1.870 21.040
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-166.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

53.300 46.000 55.300 62.700 -125.300 -82.200 -200.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.580 0.580 2.590 56.620 283.790 110.410 5.280 0.960
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

152
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-17-03.3 N 114-39-17.7 W 418.8 59.7
Address: 1303 S. Hwy 95
City: Needles County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-20-2010

94.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

59.900 -10.100 151.600 129.900 -15.400 -225.900 -36.000 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.160 98.400 493.170 6.500 1.160 1.160 1.160 1.160
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

94.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

59.900 -10.100 151.600 129.900 -15.400 -225.900 -36.000 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.580 1.330 14.890 183.230 225.420 23.600 2.250 0.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

94.600
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

59.900 -10.100 151.600 129.900 -15.400 -225.900 -36.000 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 290.400 87.700 3.260 0.840 0.580 0.670 4.010 78.160
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
153
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-04-35.0 N 118-28-08.2 W 158.5 17.1
Address: 641 N. Sepulveda Blvd.

City: Los Angeles County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -91.000
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-70.900 92.700 112.100 149.800 144.100 -226.500 -212.000 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.420 0.420 9.210 139.470 156.490 13.630 0.920 0.460
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-91.000
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-70.900 92.700 112.100 149.800 144.100 -226.500 -212.000 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 124.300 10.830 0.730 0.370 0.330 0.330 7.320 110.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
154
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-50-03.3 N 117-47-53.9 W 252.4 43.9
Address: Cannon Road
City: Orange County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010

27.400
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

57.200 -196.400 -3.700 208.100 222.700 217.200 175.500
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.080 149.280 52.970 1.010 0.640 0.640 0.640 0.640
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

154
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-50-03.3 N 117-47-53.9 W 252.4 43.9
Address: Cannon Road
City: Orange County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010

27.400
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

57.200 -196.400 -3.700 208.100 222.700 217.200 175.500
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.920 0.640 0.640 0.640 0.640 2.480 175.390 33.420
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
155
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-41-59.0 N 117-59-18.2 W 13.7 21.3
Address: 18080 Beach Blvd.

City: Huntington Beach County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010

15.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

6.600 23.400 13.600 30.500 31.800 33.500 29.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.520 1.080 14.650 28.630 7.610 0.630 0.480 0.480
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

15.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

6.600 23.400 13.600 30.500 31.800 33.500 29.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.310 0.380 0.810 8.600 66.590 136.440 87.060 15.260
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

15.800
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

6.600 23.400 13.600 30.500 31.800 33.500 29.700
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

27.250 5.830 0.570 0.480 0.480 0.530 1.460 17.650
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
156
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-13-38.8 N 118-14-50.9 W 468.2 16.8
Address: 4441 Cloud Avenue
City: La Crescenta County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -582.300
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-521.000 -493.500 152.300 238.000 198.400 66.800 -125.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.940 1.830 38.280 264.850 126.770 10.540 0.580 0.670
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-582.300
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-521.000 -493.500 152.300 238.000 198.400 66.800 -125.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

6.970 0.580 0.750 1.360 2.590 55.340 283.790 103.040
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

156
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-13-38.8 N 118-14-50.9 W 468.2 16.8
Address: 4441 Cloud Avenue
City: La Crescenta County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -582.300
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-521.000 -493.500 152.300 238.000 198.400 66.800 -125.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 241.550 155.960 13.270 0.580 0.580 0.580 1.560 29.040
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
157
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-39-51.0 N 117-39-34.1 W 262.4 6.1
Address: 20996 Marin
City: Lake Forest County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -167.300
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-504.700 -300.000 18.300 117.900 131.200 198.200 109.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.570 36.880 243.680 106.370 7.710 0.520 0.520 0.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-167.300
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-504.700 -300.000 18.300 117.900 131.200 198.200 109.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 244.450 32.980 1.230 0.520 0.520 0.600 5.350 99.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
158
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-07-40.7 N 117-53-09.7 W 193.6 15.2
Address: 990 East Alosta Avenue
City: Azusa County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -462.500
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-506.900 -155.600 -55.700 20.200 91.700 63.600 -664.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.000 43.300 184.710 103.870 9.050 0.900 0.390 0.390
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-462.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-506.900 -155.600 -55.700 20.200 91.700 63.600 -664.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.110 0.390 0.390 2.170 32.850 172.380 122.030 12.490
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-462.500
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-506.900 -155.600 -55.700 20.200 91.700 63.600 -664.800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 189.010 45.340 2.800 0.400 0.390 0.450 9.260 99.190
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

159
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-12-02.0 N 118-31-13.3 W 225.9 18.3
Address: 17750 Sherman Way
City: Encino County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -169.500
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-63.100 15.500 -20.700 -85.200 -121.900 -50.400 -132.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.140 47.320 210.380 200.910 40.930 3.870 0.510 0.510
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-169.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-63.100 15.500 -20.700 -85.200 -121.900 -50.400 -132.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.510 0.510 1.870 28.970 171.400 233.880 66.070 6.530
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-169.500
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-63.100 15.500 -20.700 -85.200 -121.900 -50.400 -132.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 218.870 78.360 8.600 0.510 0.510 1.470 22.490 139.050
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
160
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-08-13.0 N 117-58-35.2 W 148.1 19.8
Address: 1400 Buena Vista Street
City: Duarte County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -812.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-494.300 -81.700 -17.500 55.100 69.600 -26.300 -721.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.540 13.530 62.250 55.070 7.910 0.540 0.540 0.540
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-812.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-494.300 -81.700 -17.500 55.100 69.600 -26.300 -721.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.540 0.540 0.540 0.540 9.960 59.120 59.260 10.510
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-812.800
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-494.300 -81.700 -17.500 55.100 69.600 -26.300 -721.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 252.800 110.350 7.990 0.540 0.540 0.540 0.590 38.260
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

161
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-02-03.9 N 117-56-15.1 W 105.2 16.2
Address: 15920 Amar Road
City: City of Industry County: LOS ANGELES State: CA Construction Deadline: 09-17-2010 -118.000
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-84.500 -127.500 -101.200 -37.000 -4.100 28.700 10.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.600 21.900 224.300 186.600 15.200 0.600 0.630 0.600
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-118.000
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-84.500 -127.500 -101.200 -37.000 -4.100 28.700 10.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.600 0.600 0.600 1.060 29.090 120.700 45.630 2.540
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-118.000
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-84.500 -127.500 -101.200 -37.000 -4.100 28.700 10.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 276.000 41.770 3.240 0.600 0.600 0.600 6.180 135.180
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
162
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-38-15.2 N 117-14-15.2 W 544.0 23.2
Address: (The Farm) 24240 Bundy Canyon Rd
City: Wildomar County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-27-2011

86.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

90.900 89.600 132.600 122.400 -27.900 31.700 55.400
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.520 3.360 54.570 153.810 36.060 1.730 0.520 0.520
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

86.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

90.900 89.600 132.600 122.400 -27.900 31.700 55.400
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.520 0.520 0.520 1.400 30.690 153.810 59.840 2.860
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

86.600
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

90.900 89.600 132.600 122.400 -27.900 31.700 55.400
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

27.350 42.360 5.580 0.520 0.520 0.520 0.520 1.500
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

163
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-40-49.5 N 117-40-41.6 W 212.1 20.4
Address: (Cooks Bay site)25931 Towne Center Drive
City: Foothill Ranch County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-27-2011 -195.100
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-438.500 -298.400 -24.000 93.200 94.600 178.100 83.600
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

20.600 284.500 334.200 23.100 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-195.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-438.500 -298.400 -24.000 93.200 94.600 178.100 83.600
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 236.590 9.420 0.900 0.900 0.900 1.710 40.180 374.970
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
164
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-02-39.7 N 117-26-08.6 W 335.9 19.2
Address: (Via Larga site) 11660 Sierra Avenue
City: Fontana County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-27-2011 -111.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-11.700 41.800 44.600 86.800 136.400 79.100 -29.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

95.060 487.000 165.200 11.700 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.990
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-111.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-11.700 41.800 44.600 86.800 136.400 79.100 -29.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

1.590 1.590 13.200 269.520 437.110 16.620 1.590 1.590
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-11.600
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-11.700 41.800 44.700 86.800 136.400 79.100 -29.100
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 148.300 10.500 0.890 0.890 0.890 1.780 85.340 437.650
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
165
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-27-58.7 N 117-08-29.8 W 481.9 40.5
Address: 30025 Front Street
City: Temecula County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 11-04-2011 143.500
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

88.600 54.300 80.600 241.200 256.600 179.100 53.800
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.190 0.870 11.070 2.110 3.340 0.640 0.640 0.640
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

165
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-27-58.7 N 117-08-29.8 W 481.9 40.5
Address: 30025 Front Street
City: Temecula County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 11-04-2011 143.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

88.600 54.300 80.600 241.200 256.600 179.100 53.800
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

9.140 2.223 0.640 0.640 0.640 0.780 0.640 9.470
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
143.500
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

88.600 54.300 80.600 241.200 256.600 179.100 53.800
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

6.160 11.000 0.640 1.560 0.640 0.640 0.640 3.020
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
166
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-35-07.6 N 117-36-49.5 W 220.7 13.7
Address: (Tesora site) 29658 Oso Parkway
City: Las Flores County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 02-10-2012 -156.400
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-303.900 -228.800 23.300 91.700 123.000 84.000 77.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.400 1.090 12.520 134.100 164.980 21.750 1.770 0.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-156.400
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-303.900 -228.800 23.300 91.700 123.000 84.000 77.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

11.950 1.040 0.400 0.400 1.940 23.850 172.760 125.150
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-156.400
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-303.900 -228.800 23.300 91.700 123.000 84.000 77.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

57.210 202.970 65.680 5.100 0.420 0.400 0.400 4.140
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
167
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-29-04.0 N 115-28-55.0 W 243.9 68.3 1025110
Address: Cadiz site SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 5N, RANGE 14E
City: CADIZ County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 -79.100
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-24.400 -154.700 89.600 119.000 39.000 110.000 69.900
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 430.530 430.530 430.530 430.530 430.530 430.530 430.530 430.530 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

168
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-48-42.0 N 115-36-31.0 W 1261.7 30.5
Address: Granite Pass Granite Mountain
City: Baker County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 244.400
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-10.600 367.600 392.900 279.700 178.300 -159.900 354.500 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 113.370 113.370 113.370 113.370 113.370 113.370 113.370 113.370 Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
169
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-43-10.0 N 115-39-18.0 W 1112.5 60.6
Address: Fenner Valley Site 91919 Brown Buttes Rd
City: Twenty-nine Palms County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 -78.700
Antenna: 4
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

78.200 339.900 382.800 617.500 494.400 269.200 -136.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

15.630 210.860 271.640 29.110 1.670 0.670 0.670 1.430
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-78.700
Antenna: 5
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

78.200 339.900 382.800 617.500 494.400 269.200 -136.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.670 0.670 2.060 49.430 297.850 163.680 8.390 0.960
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-78.700
Antenna: 6
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)

78.200 339.900 382.800 617.500 494.400 269.200 -136.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

13.000 1.130 0.670 0.670 1.920 36.640 277.970 192.310
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
170
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-43-52.0 N 115-52-02.0 W 885.1 59.7
Address: Old Dads Mountain 26420 E. Siberia Rd
City: Amboy County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 275.900
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-155.400 -13.100 134.400 422.400 366.500 207.900 168.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.120 82.040 304.790 277.970 58.080 1.710 0.680 0.680
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
275.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-155.400 -13.100 134.400 422.400 366.500 207.900 168.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

7.660 0.680 0.680 0.680 36.640 236.590 326.590 118.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

171
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-46-29.1 N 117-29-13.2 W 309.8 51.8
Address: Temescal Cyn 23900 Temescal Canyon Rd
City: Corona County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012

23.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-82.900 -318.400 -75.100 -539.400 -551.000 -414.600 38.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.120 31.950 127.200 118.710 24.800 2.260 0.300 0.300
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

23.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-82.900 -318.400 -75.100 -539.400 -551.000 -414.600 38.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

38.430 24.970 2.630 0.300 0.300 2.000 21.020 38.420
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

23.800
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-82.500 -318.400 -75.100 -539.400 -551.000 -414.600 38.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.580 0.330 0.330 1.190 56.820 160.130 80.260 0.770
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
172
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-54-07.0 N 116-21-58.8 W 331.6 16.7
Address: Sky Valley 74555 Dillon Rd
City: Desrt Hot Springs County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 -750.400
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-790.300 -333.100 85.200 214.200 148.900 78.900 -268.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

2.030 13.730 62.080 5.040 12.650 2.520 0.740 0.740
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-750.400
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-790.300 -333.100 85.200 214.200 148.900 78.900 -268.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.820 0.820 2.230 15.100 68.250 62.720 13.910 2.770
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-750.400
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-790.300 -333.100 852.000 214.200 148.900 78.900 -268.900 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

25.260 2.010 0.820 0.820 2.650 29.680 296.830 283.470
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

173
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-31-00.3 N 117-03-38.5 W 443.2 32.2
Address: (Cerro Site) 34410 Calac Rd
City: Temecula County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 03-01-2012 -52.900
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-134.900 -161.100 -184.100 38.300 67.700 72.500 26.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.720 13.630 103.390 88.000 9.210 0.400 0.400 0.400
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-52.900
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-134.900 -161.100 -184.100 38.300 67.700 72.500 26.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.770 0.770 0.770 3.580 60.810 242.100 94.190 6.820
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-52.900
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-134.900 -161.100 -184.100 38.300 67.700 72.500 26.300
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 121.470 23.150 1.080 0.400 0.400 0.400 5.300 65.240
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
174
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-23-33.8 N 117-34-33.4 W 1553.6 24.4
Address: Mountain Top 7770 Hwy 138
City: Phelan County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-06-2012 439.000
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
423.200 304.800 473.100 -232.300 -481.000 -274.200 356.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.580 2.970 30.410 241.550 167.110 12.680 1.160 0.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
439.000
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
423.200 304.800 473.100 -232.300 -481.000 -274.200 356.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.960 0.580 0.580 2.590 56.620 283.790 110.410 5.280
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
439.000
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
423.200 304.800 473.100 -232.300 -481.000 -274.200 356.700 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 110.410 5.280 0.960 0.580 0.580 2.590 56.620 283.790
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

175
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-55-28.8 N 116-25-30.1 W 339.2 22.9
Address: (Long Canyon) 70-875 Dillon Road
City: Desert Hot Springs County: RIVERSIDE State: CA Construction Deadline: 07-27-2013 -671.100
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-711.400 -420.900 55.300 145.300 181.400 87.100 -211.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.650 42.070 277.970 121.340 8.790 0.590 0.590 0.590
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-671.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-711.400 -420.900 55.300 145.300 181.400 87.100 -211.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.190 0.590 0.590 0.590 6.080 133.050 271.640 41.110
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
-671.100
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-711.400 -420.900 55.300 145.300 181.400 87.100 -211.300 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 297.850 74.820 5.420 0.590 0.590 0.590 2.210 76.560
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
176
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-10-26.0 N 116-43-18.4 W 2529.8 27.7 1271970
Address: (Barton Flats site) 49150 Hwy 38
City: Angelus Oaks County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 396.800
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
653.100 769.400 784.300 679.600 -137.600 470.000 245.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

90.600 255.260 59.800 2.860 0.640 0.520 0.520 5.580
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
396.800
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
653.100 769.400 784.300 679.600 -137.600 470.000 245.200 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.520 0.550 0.520 0.520 7.710 119.390 243.770 44.360
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
177
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-37-35.2 N 114-38-17.6 W 614.2 59.7
Address: (Havasu Pass site) On Hwy 95
City: Needles County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 246.500
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
241.200 161.400 -85.300 160.600 203.000 128.100 49.800
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.160 1.230 9.960 14.400 2.970 0.240 0.100 0.100
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

177
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
34-37-35.2 N 114-38-17.6 W 614.2 59.7
Address: (Havasu Pass site) On Hwy 95
City: Needles County: SAN BERNARDINO State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014 246.500
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
241.200 161.400 -85.300 160.600 203.000 128.100 49.800
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.110 0.130 0.790 15.430 57.330 17.310 0.640 0.170
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
246.500
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
241.200 161.400 -85.300 160.600 203.000 128.100 49.800
0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

31.760 17.850 1.660 0.240 0.110 0.110 0.470 6.200
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
178
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
33-29-16.5 N 117-34-55.1 W 269.1 12.2
Address: (Portada Village site) 1498 1/2 Avenida Talega City: San Clemente County: ORANGE State: CA Construction Deadline: 04-11-2014

98.600
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-121.500 -96.900 134.200 201.000 244.300 200.400 152.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

3.420 58.080 192.310 68.320 4.110 0.380 0.380 0.380
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

98.600
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-121.500 -96.900 134.200 201.000 244.300 200.400 152.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.380 0.380 0.380 10.810 110.660 175.390 30.480 1.390
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)

98.600
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
-121.500 -96.900 134.200 201.000 244.300 200.400 152.100 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

17.140 0.400 0.380 0.380 0.380 21.090 149.280 142.560
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
179
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-21-45.8 N 117-38-27.1 W 1260.9 78.0 1200992
Address: (Johannesburg) 36753 Randsburg Loop
City: Johannesburg County: KERN State: CA Construction Deadline: 08-14-2014 348.100
Antenna: 1
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
240.400 331.500 397.200 350.400 146.700 538.800 431.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 354.700 104.950 5.940 0.740 0.740 0.740 2.380 84.380
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018
Reference Copy

179
Location Latitude Longitude Ground Elevation
(meters)
Structure Hgt to Tip
(meters)
Antenna Structure
Registration No.
35-21-45.8 N 117-38-27.1 W 1260.9 78.0 1200992
Address: (Johannesburg) 36753 Randsburg Loop
City: Johannesburg County: KERN State: CA Construction Deadline: 08-14-2014 348.100
Antenna: 2
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
240.400 331.500 397.200 350.400 146.700 538.800 431.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

0.740 0.880 28.460 301.410 202.420 16.350 1.290 0.740
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
348.100
Antenna: 3
Antenna Height AAT (meters)
Transmitting ERP (watts)
240.400 331.500 397.200 350.400 146.700 538.800 431.600 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315

16.350 1.290 0.740 0.740 0.880 28.460 301.410 202.420
Maximum Transmitting ERP in Watts: 140.820
Azimuth(from true north)
Control Points:

Control Pt. No. 5
Address: 500 W. Dove Road
City: Southlake County: TARRANT State: TX Telephone Number: (800)264-6620 Waivers/Conditions:

Grant of the request to update licensee name is conditioned on it not reflecting an assignment or transfer of control (see Rule

1.948); if an assignment or transfer occurred without proper notification or FCC approval, the grant is void and the station is licensed under the prior name.

License renewal granted on a conditional basis, subject to the outcome of FCC proceeding WT Docket No. 10-112 (see FCC 10-86, paras. 113 and 126).

Licensee Name: LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED
Call Sign: KNKA209 File Number: Print Date:

FCC 601-C
March 2018

Radio Frequency
–

Electromagnetic Energy
(RF
-
EME) Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

SW
-
CA
-
GLENDA
-
00237C

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd

Glendale
,
California

91201

Los Angeles

County

34.174022
;
-
118.282517

NAD83

EBI Proje
ct No.
6222007072

Prepared for:

Verizon
Small Cell

c/o
ExteNet
, LLC

3030 Warrenville Road, Suite 340

Lisle, Illinois 60532

Prepared by:

RF
-
EME Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

1 T

ABLE OF
C

ONTENTS

E

XECUTIVE
S
UMMARY
................................
................................
................................
.....................

2 1.0

S
ITE
D

ESCRIPTION AND
A
NTENNA
I

NVENTORY

................................
................................
..

3 2.0

B

ACKGROUND
I

NFORMATION AND
M

ODELING
P

ROCEDURE

................................
..............

4 3.0

M

ITIGATION
/S
ITE
C
ONTROL
O
PTIONS

................................
................................
................

5 4.0

S

UMMARY AND
C

ONCLUSIONS

................................
................................
.............................

6 5.0

L

IMITATIONS

................................
................................
................................
.........................

6 A

PPENDICES

A

PPENDIX
A

C

ERTIFICATIONS

A

PPENDIX
B

F
EDERAL
C

OMMUNICATIONS
C

OMMISSION
(FCC)

R

EQUIREMENTS

A

PPENDIX
C

R
ADIO
F

REQUENCY
E

LECTROMAGNETIC
E
NERGY
S
AFETY
/

S
IGNAGE
P
LANS

RF
-
EME Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

2 E

XECUTIVE
S
UMMARY

Purpose of Report

EnviroBusiness Inc. (dba EBI Con
sulting) has been
contracted by

ExteNet

to
to conduct radio frequency
electromagnetic (RF
-
EME) modeling for
ExteNet

site
SW
-
CA
-
GLENDA
-
00237C

located in
Glendale
,
California

to determine RF
-
EME exposure levels from the proposed wireless communications equipment at this site. As described in greater detail in Appendix B, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has developed Maximum Permissibl
e Exposure (MPE) Limits for general public exposures and occupational exposures. This report summarizes the results of RF
-
EME modeling in relation to relevant FCC RF
-
EME
compliance standards for limiting human exposure to RF
-
EME fields.

Modeling results in
cluded in this report are based on
a
site node list dated
March 19, 2021

as provided to
EBI Consulting.

Subsequent changes to the drawings or site design may yield changes in the MPE levels or FCC Compliance rec
ommendations.

The nearest adjacent building is located at a distance of at least

46 feet from the proposed installation.

Since the exact height of the adjacent structure is unknown, calculat ions were performed

at the Maximum
Antenna Face Value at a horizontal distance
of

46 feet.

All adjacent buildings are assumed to be accessible
to the general public, including all persons not fully aware of RF hazards and who are not trained in

RF
safety procedures

Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary

Location

% of FCC General
Public/Uncontrolled
Exposure Limit

% of FCC
Occupational/Controlled
Exposure Limit

Power Density
(mW/cm
2 )

Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
Occupational
Limit

Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
General
Public Limit

Proposed Verizon Antennas

Maximum
Antenna
Face
Value

198.0600

39.6120

1.9806

N/A

4 Nearest
Walking
Surface

0.6875

0.1375

0.0069

N/A

N/A

Ground
Level

0.1000

0.0200

0.0010

N/A

N/A

These results are calculated based on max power assumptions for this site. The proposed antennas will contribute the majority to these emissions. Workers
accessing any equipment on the pole should follow
all safety procedures outlined by the carrier and property owner.

Statement of Compliance

Signage recommendations are presented in Section

3.0 to bring the site into

compliance with the FCC
Rules and Regula
tions.

RF
-
EME Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

3 1.0

S
ITE
D

ESCRIPTION AND
A
NTENNA
I

NVENTORY

This project involves the installation of
three proposed
active wireless telecommunication

antennas on a
pole

in
Glendale
,
California
. This site is located in the
right of way.

The

antennas

are to be mounted on a
pole

and operating in the directions, frequencies, and heights mentioned below.

Ant #

Operator

Antenna Make

Antenna Model

Frequency
(MHz)

Azimuth (deg.)

Aperture (feet)

Total Power
Input (Watts)

Antenna Gain
(dBd)

Total ERP
(Watts)

Total EIRP
(Watts)

1 Verizon

ERICSSON

SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW

28000

0 1.3

0.6 26.14

250.8

411.3

2 Verizon

ERICSSON

SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW

28000

120

1.3 0.6

26.14 250.8

411.3

3 Verizon

ERICSSON

SM6705 CM1 02.07.22 28GHz VZW

28000

240

1.3 0.6

26.14 250.8

411.3

ID

Carrier

X

Y

Antenna Radiation
Centerline

Z
-
Height

Ground

1 Verizon

0.2 0.4

26 25.4

2 Verizon

0.2 0.4

26 25.4

3 Verizon

0.2 0.4

26 25.4

*Z
-
Height represents the distance measured from the bottom of the antenna.

RF
-
EME Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

4 2.0

B

ACKGROUND
I

NFORMATION AND
M

ODELING
P

ROCEDURE

EBI has performed theoretical modeling using Roofmaster™ software to estimate the worst -
case power
density at the site antenna face, ground level and
relevent adjacent structures
-
level resulting from the
operation of the
antennas. Using the computational methods set forth in Federal Communications (FCC) Office of Engineering & Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” (OET -
65), Roof
master™ calculates
predicted power density in a scalable grid based on the contributions of all RF sources characterized in the study scenario. At each grid location, the cumulative power density is expressed as a percentage of the FCC limits. Manufacturer

antenna pattern data is utilized in these calculations. Roofmaster™ models consist of the Far Field model as specified in OET
-
65 and an implementation of the OET
-
65 Cylindrical
Model (Sula9). The models utilize several operational specifications for diff erent types of antennas to
produce a plot of spatially
-
averaged power densities that can be expressed as a percentage of the applicable exposure limit.

For this report, EBI utilized antenna and power data provided by ExteNet and compared the resultant wors
t
-
case MPE levels to the FCC’s occupational/controlled exposure limits outlined in OET Bulletin 65.

The assumptions used in the modeling are based upon information provided by ExteNet and information gathered from other sources. The parameters used for mod eling are summarized in Section

1.0 .

A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limit
s and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards.

RF
-
EME Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

5 3.0

M

ITIGATION
/S
ITE
C
ONTROL
O
PTIONS

EBI’s modeling indicates

that there are no areas in front of the Verizon antennas that exceed the FCC standards for occupational or general public exposure
at ground level or on any adjacent structure
observed within 50 feet of this site.

To reduce the risk of exposure and/or in
jury, EBI recommends that access to areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.

Access to this site is accomplished by approaching the
pole
at ground level. Access to the

pole

is gained
via a lift or clim
bing with fall protection and therefore
antennas

are

not considered to be accessible to the
general public.

Implementation of recommended signage in this report will bring this site into compliance with the FCC’s
rules and regulations.

Attachment 1: Signage T able

Sign

Description

Posting
Instructions

Required Signage / Mitigation

Yellow

Caution

Sign

Used to alert individuals that they are
entering an area where the power density
emitted from transmitting antenna(s) may
exceed the FCC’s maximum permissible
exposure limit for the
occupational

population.

Securely post

2 signs

on
opposite sides of the
pole
3 feet below the
antennas (

22.4 feet
above ground level).

2 signs posted below the
antennas.

RF
-
EME Compliance Report

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

6 4.0

S

UMMARY AND
C

ONCLUSIONS

EBI has prepared this Radiofrequency
–

Electromagnetic Energy (RF
-
EME) Compliance Report for the
proposed ExteNet site to be located on a pole
in
Glendale
,
California
.

EBI has conducted theoretical modeling to
estimate the worst
-
case power density from the proposed
antennas to document potential MPE levels at this location and to ensure that site control measures are adequate to meet FCC and OSHA requirements.

Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Summary

Location

% of FCC General
Public/Uncontrolled
Exposure Limit

% of FCC
Occupational/Controlled
Exposure Limit

Power Density
(mW/cm
2 )

Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
Occupational
Limit

Horizontal
Approach
Distance of
General Public
Limit

Proposed Verizon
Antennas

Maximum
Antenna
Face
Value

198.0600

39.6120

1.9806

N/A

4 Nearest
Walking
Surface

0.6875

0.1375

0.0069

N/A

N/A

Ground
Level

0.1000

0.0200

0.0010

N/A

N/A

Workers should be informed about the presence and locations of antennas and their associated fields.

Recommended control measures are outlined in Section

3.0 .

To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, EBI recommends that access to areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.

Implementation of the signage recommended in this report will bring this s ite into compliance with the
FCC’s rules and regulations.

5.0 L

IMITATIONS

This report was prepared for the use of
ExteNet.

It was performed in accordance with generally accepted
practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by
EBI

are based solely on the information provided

by the
client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to EBI

so that our conclusions may be
revised and modified, if necessary. T
his report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

Appendix A

Certifications

Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

Preparer
Certification

I,
Jonathan Walz
, state that:

§

I am an employee of EnviroBusiness Inc. (d/b/a EBI Consulting), which provides RF -
EME safety
and compliance services to the wireless communications industry.

§

I have successfully completed RF
-
EME safety training,
and I am aware of the potential hazards
from RF
-
EME and would be classified “occupational” under the FCC regulations.

§

I am fully aware of and familiar with the Rules and Regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation.

§

I have been trained on RF
-
EME modeling using Roofmaster™ modeling software.

§

I have reviewed the data provided by the client and incorporated it into this S ite Compliance
Report such that the information contained in this report is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

Reviewed and Approved by:

Michael McGuire

Electrical Engineer

[email protected]

Note that EBI’s scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Radio Frequency –

Electromagnetic Energy
(RF
-
EME) field generated by the antennas and broadcast equipment noted in this report. The engineering
and design of the building and related structures, as well as the impact of the antennas and broadcast equipment on the structural integrity of the building, are specifically excluded from EBI’s scope of work.

sealed 30dec2022
Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

Appendix B

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Requirements

Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

The FCC has established Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic (RF
-
EME) energy fields, based on exposure limits recommended by the Nat
ional Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and, over a wide range of frequencies, the exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted by the American National Standards Institut e (ANSI) to replace the 1982 ANSI
guidelines. Limits for localized absorption are based on recommendations of both ANSI/IEEE and NCRP.

The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are based upon occupational/controlled exposure

limits (for workers) and general public/uncontrolled exposure limits for members of the general public.

Occupational/controlled exposure limits

apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment and in which those person s who are exposed have been made fully
aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a

location where exposure levels may be above general public/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by s ome other appropriate means.

General public/uncontrolled exposure limits

apply to situations in which the general public may be
exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential fo
r exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment
-
related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a
nearby residential area.

Table 1 and Figure 1 (below), which are included within the FCC’s OET Bulletin 65, summarize the MPE limits for RF emissions. These limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. They vary by frequency
to take into account the different types of equipment that may be in operation at a particular facility and are “time
-
averaged” limits to reflect different durations resulting from controlled and uncontrolled exposures.

The FCC’s MPEs are measured in terms

of power (mW) over a unit surface area (cm
2 ). Known as the
power density, the FCC has established an occupational MPE of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm
2 ) and an uncontrolled MPE of 1 mW/cm
2 for equipment operating in the 1900 MHz frequency
rang
e
.

Equipment operating in the

700 MHz frequency range has an established occupational MPE of 2.33 (mW/cm
2 ) and a general public MPE of 0.47 mW/cm
2 ,
equipment operating in the

850 MHz frequency
range the occupational MPE is 2.83 mW/cm
2 and the general publi
c MPE is 0.57 mW/cm
2 , and
equipment
operating in the

1900 and 2100 MHz frequency range the occupational MPE is

5 mW/cm
2 and general
public MPE is 1 mW/cm
2 . These limits are considered protective of these populations.

Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

Table 1: Limits for Maximum
Permissible Exposure (MPE)

(A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure

Frequency Range
(MHz)

Electric Field
Strength (E)

(V/m)

Magnetic Field
Strength (H)

(A/m)

Power Density (S)

(mW/cm
2 )

Averaging Time
[E]
2 , [H]
2 , or S

(minutes)

0.3 -

3.0 614

1.63 (100)*

6 3.0
-
30 1842/f

4.89/f

(900/f
2 )*

6 30
-
300

61.4 0.163

1.0 6

300
-
I,500

--

--

f/300

6 1,500
-
100,000

--

--

5 6

(B) Limits for General Public/Uncontrolled Exposure

Frequency Range
(MHz)

Electric Field
Strength (E)

(V/m)

Magnetic Field
Strength (H)

(A/m)

Power Density (S)

(mW/cm
2 )

Averaging Time
[E]
2 , [H]
2 , or S

(minutes)

0.3 -

1.34 614

1.63 (100)*

30 1.34
-
30 824/f

2.19/f

(180/f
2 )*

30 30
-
300

27.5 0.073

0.2 30

300
-
1,500

--

--

f/1,500

30 1,500
-
100,000

--

--

1.0 30

f =
Frequency in (MHz)

* Plane
-
wave equivalent power density

Power Density (mW/cm
2 )

Small Cell Noise Study

Site No.

CA002_GLENDALE_137

EBI Project No.
6222007072

Front Of 1544 Kenneth Rd
,
Glendale
,
California

EBI Consulting
·

21 B Street
·

Burlington, MA 01803
·

1.800.786.2346

Based on the above, the most restrictive thresholds for exposures of unlimited duration to RF energy for several personal wireless services are summarized
below:

Personal Wireless Service

Approximate

Frequency

Occupational
MPE

Public MPE

Microwave (Point
-
to
-
Point)

5,000
-

80,000 MHz

5.00 mW/cm
2 1.00 mW/cm
2 Broadband Radio (BRS)

2,600 MHz

5.00 mW/cm
2 1.00 mW/cm
2 Wireless Communication (WCS)

2,300 MHz

5.00 mW/cm
2 1.00 mW/cm
2 Advanced Wireless (AWS)

2,100 MHz

5.00 mW/cm
2 1.00 mW/cm
2 Personal Communication (PCS)

1,950 MHz

5.00 mW/cm
2 1.00 mW/cm
2 Cellular Telephone

870 MHz

2.90 mW/cm
2 0.58 mW/cm
2 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR)

855 MHz

2.85 mW/cm
2 0.57 mW/cm
2 Long Term Evolution (LTE)

700 MHz

2.33 mW/cm
2 0.47 mW/cm
2 Most Restrictive Frequency Range

30 -
300 MHz

1.00 mW/cm
2 0.20 mW/cm
2 MPE limits are designed to provide a substantial margin of safety. These limits apply for continuous exposures and
are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health.

Personal Communication Services (PCS) facilities operate within a frequency range of 1850 -
1990 MHz.

Facilities typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets) connected to wired telephone lines; and 2) antennas that send the wirel
ess signals created by the transceivers to be received
by individual subscriber units (PCS telephones). Transceivers are typically connected to antennas by coaxial cables.

Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) facilities operate within a frequency range of 2155 -
2180 MHz. Facilities
typically consist of: 1) electronic transceivers (the radios or cabinets); and 2) antennas that send the wireless signals created by the transceivers to be received by individual subscriber units. Transceivers are typically connected
to antennas by coaxial cables.

Because of the short wavelength of PCS/AWS services, the antennas require line -
of
-
site paths for good
propagation, and are typically installed above ground level. Antennas are constructed to concentrate energy towards the hor
izon, with as little energy as possible scattered towards the ground or the sky.

This design, combined with the low power of PCS facilities, generally results in no possibility for exposure to approach Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels, with the ex ception of areas directly in front of
the antennas.

FCC Compliance Requirement

A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits
and

there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicabl e MPE must participate in mitigating these RF
hazards.

Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions

Alternative Site Analysis
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
Front of 1544 W. Kenneth Rd., Glendale, CA91201

February 2, 2023

Site Location and Vicinity Map

North

Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions

Proposed Site

• The proposed site location will
adequately fulfill the RF coverage
objectives and will eliminate or
minimize gaps in pre-existing
coverage.

• Provides coverage along the roadway
and adjacent areas.

• There are no tall trees or structures in
the immediate vicinity of this site
which would decrease the RF
coverage.

Aerial View

Alternative 1
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions

• Alternative 1 is on the wooden
utility pole which GWP has advised
against.

• Alternative 1 is located at an
intersection and would require more
extensive traffic coordination than the
proposed site.

• Alternative 1 has tree in the
immediate vicinity which would
decrease the RF coverage.

Aerial View

Alternative 2
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions

• Alternative 2 is on the wooden
utility pole which GWP has advised
against.

• Alternative 2 is located at an
intersection and would require more
extensive traffic coordination than the
proposed site.

• Alternative 2 has tree in the
immediate vicinity which would
decrease the RF coverage.

Aerial View

Alternative 3
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions

• Alternative 3 is farther away from the
coverage objective.

• Alternative 3 is located close to
the driveway which is not
recommended.

• Alternative 3 is not in a location that
will meet coverage objectives.

•

Aerial View

Glendale
Existing 4G Sites With Proposed 5G Locations
0 1 2 Scale in miles
In Building Coverage
In Transit Coverage
Outdoor Coverage
RSRP Levels
N

SW-CA-GLENDA-00237B
Antenna Height: 26.42 ft AGL
0 400 800
Scale in feet
RSRP Levels
In Building Coverage
In Transit Coverage
Outdoor Coverage
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
FO 1544 W Kenneth Rd
Glendale, CA 91201
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
Disclaimer: This photo simulation is an artist’s depiction of a future installation. The actual construction may vary slightly in size, layout, color and texture from this simulation.

Facing W
Facing N
Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
Disclaimer: This photo simulation is an artist’s depiction of a future installation. The actual construction may vary slightly in size, layout, color and texture from this simulation.

SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
FO 1544 W Kenneth Rd
Glendale, CA 91201
Facing North

EXISTING PROPOSED

Copyright © 2021 TeleWorld Solutions
Disclaimer: This photo simulation is an artist’s depiction of a future installation. The actual construction may vary slightly in size, layout, color and texture from this simulation.

EXISTING PROPOSED
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
FO 1544 W Kenneth Rd
Glendale, CA 91201
Facing West

TITLE SHEET
DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
T-1
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

CODE COMPLIANCE

GENERAL NOTES

SITE INFORMATION

PROJECT TEAM
THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. A

TECHNICIAN WILL VISIT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE
MAINTENANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT ON DRAINAGE; NO SANITARY SEWER SERVICE,

POTABLE WATER, OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND NO COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE IS NEEDED.

PROPERTY OWNER: PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
POLE OWNER: GLENDALE WATER AND POWER
POWER PROVIDER: GLENDALE WATER AND POWER
141 N. GLENDALE AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91206
CONTACT: SENIOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
PHONE: (818) 548-3924
EMAIL: TBD
APPLICANT: EXTENET SYSTEMS, CA LLC.

ADDRESS: 300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE 400
BURBANK, CA 91502
LATITUDE (NAD 83): 34° 10' 26.48" N

34.174022°
LONGITUDE (NAD 83): 118° 16' 57.06" W
-118.282517°
LONGITUDE / LATITUDE TYPE: NAVD 83
GROUND ELEVATION (NAVD 88): ±624'-6"
ADJACENT APN#: 5622-027-018
JURISDICTION: CITY OF GLENDALE
CURRENT ZONING: PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
NEW USE: UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TO OBTAIN LOCATION OF PARTICIPANTS

UNDERGROUND FACILITIES BEFORE YOU DIG
IN CALIFORNIA (SOUTH). CALL DIG ALERT
TOLL FREE: 1-800-227-2600 OR
www.digalert.org

CALIFORNIA STATUTE REQUIRES MINIMUM OF
2 WORKING DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU

EXCAVATE

VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP

DRIVING DIRECTIONS

DIRECTIONS FROM
EXTENET OFFICE:
300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE 400, BURBANK, CA 91502.

HEAD NORTHEAST ON E MAGNOLIA BLVD TOWARD N GLENOAKS BLVD, TURN RIGHT ONTO N GLENOAKS BLVD, TURN LEFT ONTO ALLEN AVE, TURN RIGHT ONTO W KENNETH RD, DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT.

ARRIVE AT 1544 W KENNETH RD., GLENDALE, CA 91201

DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

APPROVALS

CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
IF USING 11" X 17" PLOT. DRAWINGS WILL BE HALF SCALE

SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON

THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY

DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME

THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS & AUTHORIZE THE SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALL DOCUMENTS

ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSE CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS.

APPROVED BY: INITIALS: DATE:

RF ENGINEER:

OPERATIONS:

SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER:

PROJECT MANAGER:

ZONING MANAGER:

LEASING VENDOR:

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:

A/E MANAGER:

PROPERTY OWNER:

UTILITY:
 
 
PROJECT: SW-CA-GLN5GG02-VZW
SITE NAME: CA002_GLENDALE_137
SITE NUMBER: SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C
POLE ID#: SL_6164
SITE ADDRESS: FRONT OF 1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201

SHEET INDEX
MAP DATA /g164/;#23#23#232023 GOOGLE
N
MAP DATA /g164/;#23#23#232023 GOOGLE
N

PROJECT MANAGER

TELEWORLD SOLUTIONS
43130 AMBERWOOD PLAZA, SUITE 210
CHANTILLY, VA 20152
CONTACT: RYAN GROSS
PHONE: (224) 293-6355
EMAIL: [email protected]

OSP ENGINEER
TBD
CONTACT:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

SAC/ZONING/PERMITTING

TELEWORLD SOLUTIONS
43130 AMBERWOOD PLAZA, SUITE 210
CHANTILLY, VA 20152
CONTACT: ALEXANDER NOVAK
PHONE: (682) 351-3335
EMAIL: [email protected]

RF ENGINEER
TBD
CONTACT:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE

PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.

1. GLENDALE BUILDING & SAFETY CODE, 2019 - ORDINANCE 5892

2. GLENDALE BUILDING & SAFETY CODE, 2019 - INSERT VERSION

3. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE

4. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE

5. 2019 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE

6. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE

7. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE

8. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE

9. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE

10. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE

11. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE

12. GO95/GO128
ADA COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN
HABITATION. AND IS EXEMPTED FROM ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE SECTION 11B-203.5

SENIOR TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER
EXTENET SYSTEMS CA, LLC.
300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE 400
BURBANK, CA 91502
CONTACT: EDWARD MARTINEZ
PHONE: (818) 419-2147
EMAIL: [email protected]
T-1 TITLE SHEET
T-3
GENERAL NOTES AND 1-A CERTIFICATION LETTER (COMPLETED BY OTHERS) A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN
A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN
A-3 EXISTING AND NEW SOUTH ELEVATIONS
A-4 EXISTING AND NEW EAST ELEVATIONS
D-1 EQUIPMENT DETAILS
E-2

EXISTING SITE POLE PHOTOS
T-2
E-1

CONDUIT PLACEMENT DETAILS
D-2 EQUIPMENT DETAILS
G-1 GROUNDING DIAGRAM, NOTES AND DETAILS
E-4
E-3

UTILITY SITE PLAN

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM & PANEL SCHEDULE

CONDUIT PLACEMENT DETAILS

THE PROJECT CONSIST OF THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED

EQUIPMENT FOR EXTENET'S PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICE (PCS) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK.
/g120REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING 25'-0" AGL ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE & FOUNDATION WITH NEW 25'-0" AGL ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137) & FOUNDATION 5'-0" EAST OF ORIGINAL LOCATION.
/g120NEW 3'-6" X 8'-0" REINFORCED FOUNDATION 5'-0" EAST OF ORIGINAL LOCATION. /g120(3) 16.2" X 8.1" X 6.1" PANEL ANTENNAS WITH INTEGRATED RRU'S WITHIN CONCEALMENT SHROUD. /g12011.50" X 8.0" X 3.313" METER CAN WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE. /g12010.43" X 9.38" X 5.06" AC DISCONNECT/LOAD CENTER WITH INTEGRATED SURGE PROTECTION WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE.
/g120(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX FOR FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT). /g120(2) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR POWER.
/g120PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT EMIT ANY SOUND.

SENIOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
EXTENET SYSTEMS CA, LLC.
300 E. MAGNOLIA BLVD. SUITE 400
BURBANK, CA 91502
CONTACT: MARCOS A. CASTRO
PHONE: (760) 625-5476
EMAIL: [email protected]
N1 NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
S1 ASSEMBLY - ELEVATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
S2 ASSEMBLY - ELEVATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
S3 ASSEMBLY - ELEVATIONS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
S5
FOUNDATION DETAILS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)S6

LIGHT ARM CONNECTION DETAILS (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)
TCP-1 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN (COMPLETED BY OTHERS)

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
T-2
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP
GENERAL NOTES 1-A CERTIFICATION LETTER1 2
GENERAL NOTES AND 1-A

CERTIFICATION LETTER

COMPLETED BY OTHERS/ FOR REFERENCE ONLY
GENERAL NOTES:

1. THESE NOTES SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.

2. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS AND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.

3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITES(S) AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS, AND CONFIRM THAT THE WORK MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED PER THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PRIOR TO BID SUBMITTAL.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED ON ANY WORK NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR IDENTIFIED IN THE CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE STARTING ANY WORK.

5. ALL WORK PREFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES, INCLUDING APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. IF THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPLICABLE CODES OR REGULATIONS, REVIEW AND RESOLVE THE CONFLICT WITH DIRECTION FROM THE IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT/ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.

7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES,

AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATION OF ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT INCLUDING CONTACT

AND COORDINATION WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER AND WITH THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY OUTSIDE POLE OR PROPERTY OWNER.

8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO PAVING, CURBS, VEGETATION, GALVANIZED SURFACE OR OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF EXTENET.

9. CONTRACTOR IS TO KEEP THE GENERAL AREA CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION DAILY.

10. PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE SCALED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RELY ONLY ON ANNOTATED DIMENSIONS AND REQUEST INFORMATION IF ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS ARE REQUIRED.

11. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND OTHER AGENCY'S FACILITIES WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. OTHER FACILITIES MAY EXIST. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION AND USE EXTREME CARE AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO THESE FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE

FOR THE PROTECTION OF UTILITIES OR OTHER AGENCY'S FACILITIES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE WORK, WHETHER THEY ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR NOT.

12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (800) 227- 2600, AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY EXCAVATION.

13. THE EXISTING STREET LIGHT FACILITIES (PULL BOXES, STREET LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, ETC.) SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE AND BE ACCESSIBLE TO GWP PERSONNEL AT ALL TIMES.

14. ANY WORK TO BE DONE BY GLENDALE WATER & POWER, AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH GWP STREET LIGHT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN ADVANCE AT THE PROJECT'S EXPENSE.

EXISTING SITE POLE
PHOTOS
EXISTING SITE POLE LOCATION LOOKING WESTEXISTING SITE POLE LOCATION LOOKING NORTH 1 2 DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
T-3
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
A-1
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

OVERALL SITE PLAN
OVERALL SITE PLAN 120' 10' 0" 20'
24"x36" SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
NOTE:

THE EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION WILL BE

COMPLETELY REMOVED
N
LEGEND:

ELECTRIC
FIBER

OVERHEAD FIBER
SEWER
GAS
WATER
E
F
TELCO

STREET LIGHT

STORM DRAIN
ROW
C/F
C/L
C/F
ROW
50'-0" R.O.W.
25'-0"
25'-0"
30'-0"
15'-0"
15'-0"
10'-0"
9'-0"
4" WATER
SEWER
GAS
ROW
C/F
C/L
C/F
ROW
60'-0" R.O.W.
30'-0"
30'-0"
36'-0"
18'-0"
18'-0"
12'-0"
19'-6"
6'-0"
12'-0"
4" WATER
GAS
SEWER

TELECOM
WATER
ROW
C/F
C/L
C/F
ROW
50'-0" R.O.W.
25'-0"
25'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0"
14'-0"
5'-0"
10'-0"
WATER
SEWER
WATER

JUSTIN AVE

JUSTIN AVE

W KENNETH RD
ROW
C/F
C/L
C/F
ROW
60'-0" R.O.W.
30'-0"
30'-0"
36'-0"
18'-0"
18'-0"
12'-0"
12'-0"
6'-0"
GAS
SEWER

TELECOM
WATER
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137)

FOUNDATION, AND NEW EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL

LOCATION (BY OTHERS)
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL
STREET LIGHT POLE (ID# SL_6164)

AND FOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-6" X
8'-0" REINFORCED FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)

NEW EXTENET

SITE LOCATION
-
A-2

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING
CURB (TYP.)

EXISTING
GUTTER (TYP.)

EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT

EXISTING WOODEN
POLE (TYP.)

EXISTING
LANDSCAPE (TYP.)

EXISTING CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
EXISTING TREE (TYP.)
3'-0"
3'-0"
-
S6
-
S1-S3

T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
A-2
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

ENLARGED SITE PLAN
ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1
24"x36" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8' 6' 4' 0" 8'2'
N
LEGEND:

ELECTRIC
FIBER

OVERHEAD FIBER
SEWER
GAS
WATER
E
F
TELCO

STREET LIGHT

STORM DRAIN
NOTE:

THE EXISTING POLE FOUNDATION WILL

BE COMPLETELY REMOVED
NOTE:

LOCATION OF CONDUIT(S), AND PULL

BOX(ES) TO BE DETERMINED BY GWP

INSPECTOR DURING

PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING
NOTE:

CONDUIT SHALL BE RGC OR SCH80 PVC
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTE:

THE LOCATIONS AND EXISTENCE OF ANY

UNDERGROUND PIPES, STRUCTURES OR CONDUITS

SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH
OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. THERE MAY BE EXISTING
UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE

PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE

UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT
SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

NOTES:

1. IF DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PLAN DO NOT SCALE

CORRECTLY, CHECK FOR REDUCTION OR
ENLARGEMENT FROM ORIGINAL PLANS.

2. UTILITY DESIGN AND RUNS ARE PRELIMINARY.

PENDING FINAL DESIGN FROM UTILITY PROVIDERS.

3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SUB STRUCTURE

LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION

CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE ASPHALT, CURBS, ADA

RAMPS, PARKWAYS AND SIDEWALKS TO ORIGINAL
STATE PER CITY STANDARDS.

4. ALL CONDUCTORS/WIRES & CONDUIT, SHALL BE
INSTALLED IN A NEAT AND TIDY FASHION. ALL

EXCESS WIRE SLACK IS TO BE REMOVED AND
HIDDEN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

5. ALL NEWLY INSTALLED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE

PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING POLE, AND OR

SURROUNDINGS UNLESS PROHIBITED BY
MANUFACTURER.

NOTE:

CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE EXISTING
STREET LIGHT PULL BOXES AS NEEDED.
6 E-3

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX FOR

FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
5 E-3
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL (1)
17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR POWER
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137)

FOUNDATION, AND NEW EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL

LOCATION (BY OTHERS)
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-6" X
8'-0" REINFORCED FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
-
S6

EXTENET TO PLACE NEW PANEL

ANTENNAS AND SHROUD ON NEW

ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
3, 4
D-1
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL
STREET LIGHT POLE ID# SL_6164

AND FOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED
-
S1-S3

EXISTING
CURB (TYP.)

EXISTING
GUTTER (TYP.)

EXISTING STAND ALONE

UTILITY WOODEN POLE

EXISTING
LANDSCAPE (TYP.)

EXISTING CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
EXISTING TREE (TYP.)
-
A-4
-
A-3

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING

EXISTING

BUILDING
ROW
C/F
C/L
C/F
ROW

EXISTING MANHOLE

W KENNETH RD
10'-0"
TO C/L OF E. MOUNTAIN ST.
5'-0"
4'-0"
2'-0"
10'-0"

EXISTING OVER HEAD

STREET LIGHT POWER
(TYP.)

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL (1) 17" X 30" X 24"

PULL BOX FOR POWER
5 E-3
3'-0"

O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H
NOTICE
DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
A-3
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP
EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH) NEW SOUTH ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH)2' 0" 2' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1' 2' 0" 2'
24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1'1 2

EXISTING AND NEW

SOUTH ELEVATIONS

TOP OF EXISTING POLE
±25'-0" AGL

TOP OF EXISTING LUMINAIRE
±26'-5" AGL
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT POLE (ID# SL_6164) TO BE

REMOVED

EXTENET TO REMOVE

EXISTING FOUNDATION

EXISTING LUMINAIRE

TO BE REMOVED
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-6" X
8'-0" REINFORCED FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
3'-6"
8'-0"
-
S6

EXTENET TO PLACE NEW RF

SIGNAGE MOUNTED ON NEW POLE
2 D-1

NEW MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE

TO MATCH EXISTING MAST ARM

AND LUMINAIRE (BY OTHERS)
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137),

FOUNDATION, AND NEW EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL

LOCATION (BY OTHERS)

FUTURE CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA WITH

INTEGRATED RRUS TO BE INSTALLED
(TOTAL OF 3)
3 D-1

EXISTING CURB

EXISTING CURB

NEW CABLE COVER TO BE INSTALLED

EXTENET TO PLACE NEW CONCEALMENT

SHROUD MOUNTED ONTO NEW ROUND

METAL STREET LIGHT POLE

PAINT SHROUD TO MATCH THE

STREET LIGHT COLOR
4 D-1

FINISHED GRADE

TOP OF NEW METAL POLE
±25'-0"

FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER OF NEW PANEL ANTENNAS
±26'-11 1/2"

TOP OF NEW CONCEALMENT SHROUD
±28'-0"
NEW METER FACE ℄
±4'-6"

EXISTING DIRT/GRASS EXISTING DIRT/GRASS

EXISTING OVERHEAD STREET LIGHT

POWER TO BE REMOVED AND

REROUTED UNDERGROUND
GRADE
±0'-0"
NEW DISCONNECT/LOAD CENTER ℄
±6'-0"

NEW AC DISCONNECT/LOAD CENTER

WITH INTEGRATED SURGE PROTECTION

TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN NEW ROUND

METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
5 D-1BOTTOM OF RELOCATED SIGN
±7'-0"

TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION
±0'-0"
-
S5

NEW METER CAN TO BE INSTALLED

WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE. GWP TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUM OF
60A SERVICE AND SERVICE METER
1 D-2

TOP OF NEW RF SIGNAGE
±21'-6"
NEW MAST ARM MOUNT ℄
±22'-0"
-
S1-S3
NOTE:

AN ANALYSIS OF THE TOWER OR STRUCTURE HAS
BEEN PERFORMED BY NB+C ENGINEERING
SERVICES DATED 12/19/2022. THE LOCATION AND

MOUNTING SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SHALL SUPERSEDE THESE DRAWINGS.

NOTE:

TOWER DESIGN HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY OTHERS.

SEE SHEETS S1-S3.

NOTE:

TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN HAS BEEN
COMPLETED BY OTHERS. SEE SHEET S6.

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±45'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

PULL BOX TO PULL BOX AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36
5 E-3

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
(1) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR
POWER

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 2" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 1" RGC POWER CONDUIT

FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" FOR GLENDALE

STREET LIGHT POWER FEED

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
A-4
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

EXISTING AND NEW EAST

ELEVATIONS
EXISTING EAST ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST) NEW EAST ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST)2' 0" 2' 24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1' 2' 0" 2'
24"x36" SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1'1 2

TOP OF EXISTING POLE
±25'-0" AGL
GRADE
±0'-0"

TOP OF EXISTING LUMINAIRE
±26'-5" AGL
EXISTING 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET
LIGHT POLE (ID# SL_6164) TO BE

REMOVED

EXTENET TO REMOVE

EXISTING FOUNDATION

EXISTING LUMINAIRE

TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING DIRT/GRASS
EXTENET TO PLACE NEW 3'-6" X
8'-0" REINFORCED FOUNDATION
(BY OTHERS)
-
S6

EXTENET TO PLACE NEW RF

SIGNAGE MOUNTED ON NEW POLE
2 D-1

NEW MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE

TO MATCH EXISTING MAST ARM

AND LUMINAIRE (BY OTHERS)
NEW 25'-0" ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE (CA002_GLENDALE_137),

FOUNDATION, AND NEW EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED 3'-0" SOUTH OF ORIGINAL

LOCATION (BY OTHERS)

FUTURE CARRIER PANEL ANTENNA WITH

INTEGRATED RRUS TO BE INSTALLED
(TOTAL OF 3)
3 D-1

NEW CABLE COVER TO BE INSTALLED

EXTENET TO PLACE NEW CONCEALMENT

SHROUD MOUNTED ONTO NEW ROUND

METAL STREET LIGHT POLE

PAINT SHROUD TO MATCH THE

STREET LIGHT COLOR
4 D-1

TOP OF NEW METAL POLE
±25'-0"
NEW METER FACE ℄
±4'-6"

EXISTING DIRT/GRASS

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX FOR

FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL ±5'-0"
OF (3) 1.25" HDPE FIBER CONDUITS FROM PULL
BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 30"

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 1" RGC POWER CONDUIT

FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" FOR GLENDALE

STREET LIGHT POWER FEED
NEW DISCONNECT/LOAD CENTER ℄
±6'-0"

NEW AC DISCONNECT/LOAD CENTER

WITH INTEGRATED SURGE PROTECTION

TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN NEW ROUND

METAL STREET LIGHT POLE
5 D-1

BOTTOM OF RELOCATED SIGN
±7'-0"
6 E-3

FINISHED GRADE

TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION
±0'-0"
3'-6"
8'-0"
-
S5

NEW METER CAN TO BE INSTALLED

WITHIN NEW ROUND METAL STREET LIGHT
POLE. GWP TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUM OF
60A SERVICE AND SERVICE METER
1 D-2

TOP OF NEW RF SIGNAGE
±21'-6"
NEW MAST ARM MOUNT ℄
±22'-0"
-
S1-S3

FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER OF NEW PANEL ANTENNAS
±26'-11 1/2"

TOP OF NEW CONCEALMENT SHROUD
±28'-0"
NOTE:

AN ANALYSIS OF THE TOWER OR STRUCTURE HAS
BEEN PERFORMED BY NB+C ENGINEERING
SERVICES DATED 12/19/2022. THE LOCATION AND

MOUNTING SHOWN IN THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SHALL SUPERSEDE THESE DRAWINGS.

NOTE:

TOWER DESIGN HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY OTHERS.

SEE SHEETS S1-S3.

NOTE:

TOWER FOUNDATION DESIGN HAS BEEN
COMPLETED BY OTHERS. SEE SHEET S6.

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±45'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

PULL BOX TO PULL BOX AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36
5 E-3

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
(1) 17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR
POWER

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 2" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
D-1
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

EQUIPMENT DETAILS
CARRIER AZIMUTHS 1

CONCEALMENT SHROUD DETAIL

DISCONNECT DETAIL
4 5
ALPHA = 0°
BETA = 120°GAMMA = 240°
ANTENNA DETAIL 3
RF SIGNAGE DETAIL 2
RAYCAP - RSCAC-1333-P-240
R
(FOR REFERENCE ONLY)
ERICSSON - AIR 6705
DIMENSIONS: 16.2" X 8.1" X 6.1"
WEIGHT: 31 LBS (14KG)
1"

E ONLY)
(FOR REFERENCE

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
D-2
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 12/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

EQUIPMENT DETAILS

RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE
42 RF INFORMATION

RF SYSTEM SCHEDULE

ANTENNA

SECTOR AZIMUTH NUMBER OF

ANTENNAS

ANTENNA
MODEL NO. COAX SIZE JUMPER

ANTENNA

ANTENNA
RAD CENTER # OF COAX
A 0° 1 ERICSSON AIR 6705 1/2" - 26'-11 1/2" TBD
B 120° 1 1/2" - 26'-11 1/2" TBD
C 240° 1 1/2" - 26'-11 1/2" TBD
OSP ENG.:

POLE NUMBER
POLE

ANTENNA TIP HEIGHT
CLOSEST AVAILABLE PWR.

CLOSEST AVAILABLE TELCO
TELCO CONTACT/PHONE #
COMM: GTE, H
PWR PLANNER/PHONE #

X-ARM ORIENTATION

CROSS STREET
PWR E. M. OTHER
T.B.G. MAP NO.:

BTS LOCATIONRC AMSLGROUND ELV. DIVERSITY SEP# OF TRU'S BTS TYPE

SECTOR A
AZIMUTH TN RC TIP HT. LENGTH(S) ANTENNA

SECTOR A CABLE
QTY

SECTOR A
RC TIP HT. ANTENNA LENGTH(S) QTYAZIMUTH TN

SECTOR B SECTOR B CABLE SECTOR B

SECTOR C
AZIMUTH TN RC TIP HT. LENGTH(S) ANTENNA

SECTOR G CABLE
QTY

SECTOR C
RF ENGINEER:

STREET ADDRESS:

COORDINATES: LATITUDE: LONGITUDE:

R.F. INFORMATION
R.F. REQUIREMENTS

GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
TBD
1544 W KENNETH RD. GLENDALE, CA 91201
34° 10' 26.48" N 118° 16' 57.06" W
±624'-6" ± 651'-0" ON POLE -- RRUS
0° 26'-11 1/2" 28'-0" ERICSSON AIR 6705 TBD 1
120° 26'-11 1/2" 28'-0" ERICSSON AIR 6705 TBD 1
240° 26'-11 1/2" 28'-0" ERICSSON AIR 6705 TBD 1
TBD
TBD
HEIGHT 25'-0" AGL
28'-0"
N/A

W KENNETH RD
TBD

CITY OF GLENDALE
TBD
TBD

N/A (EXTENET)
N/A
N/A
ERICSSON AIR 6705
ERICSSON AIR 6705
3METER CAN DETAIL 1
MILBANK - U7490-RL-TG
4 TERMINAL RING TYPE SMALL HUB OPEN TRIPLEX GROUND 125 AMPERE TYPE: RING TYPE METER SOCKET
APPLICATION: METER SOCKET
STANDARD: UL LISTED; TYPE 3R
VOLTAGE RATING: 600 VOLTS ALTERNATING CURRENT
AMPERAGE RATING: 125 CONTINUOUS AMPERE
PHASE: 1 PHASE
FREQUENCY RATING: 60 HERTZ
SIZE: 3.313L X 8W X 11.5H
NUMBER OF MAIN BREAKERS: 0
MAIN BREAKER SIZE: NO MAIN BREAKER
CABLE ENTRY: OVERHEAD OR UNDERGROUND
TERMINAL: LAY IN
INSULATION: GLASS POLYESTER
MOUNTING: SURFACE MOUNT
MATERIAL: G90 GALVANIZED STEEL WITH POWER COAT FINISH
NUMBER OF JAWS: 4 TERMINAL
BYPASS PROVISION: NO BYPASS
NUMBER OF METER POSITIONS: 1 POSITION
EQUIPMENT GROUND: TRIPLEX GROUND
HUB/CLOSING PLATE: SMALL HUB OPENING
LINE SIDE WIRE RANGE: 6 - 2/0 AWG
LOAD SIDE WIRE RANGE: 6 - 2/0 AWG
NUMBER OF RECEPTACLES: 0

ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS

T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
E-1
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 03/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

UTILITY SITE PLAN
UTILITY SITE PLAN 14' 3' 2' 1' 0" 4'
24"x36" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
11"x17" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
NOTE:

LOCATION OF PEDESTAL, CONDUIT(S), AND PULL

BOX(ES) TO BE DETERMINED BY GWP INSPECTOR

DURING PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING
NOTES:

1. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY

TO COORDINATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER &

NECESSARY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE

LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING BELOW GRADE
UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY

DAMAGE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING
BELOW GRADE UTILITIES.

2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY

COMPANY FOR CONNECTION OF TEMPORARY AND
PERMANENT POWER TO SITE. THE TEMPORARY

POWER AND ALL HOOKUP COSTS TO BE PAID BY
CONTRACTOR.

3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCAL UTILITY

REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPTH, SIZE & SEPARATION
OF CONDUITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NOTIFY

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IMMEDIATELY FOR ANY
DISCREPANCIES.

4. CONTRACTOR TO CALL DIG ALERT (800) 227-2600
MINIMUM OF 48 HRS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING FOR
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.

CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO HAVE ALL

NONPUBLIC UTILITIES LOCATED AT THEIR OWN
EXPENSE.

5. NEW UTILITY SERVICES SHOWN NEED TO BE

VERIFIED & APPROVED BY UTILITY COMPANIES
BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR

TO VERIFY WITH CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER TO
OBTAIN FINAL APPROVAL.

6. LINES SHOWN DO NOT REPRESENT THE EXACT

LOCATION OF THE CONDUIT RUNS CONTRACTOR

TO VERIFY SERVICE LOCATIONS W/ ACTUAL FIELD
CONDITIONS.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY INFORM CLIENT

OF ANY ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE TO EXISTING

UTILITIES BY TELEPHONE AND E-MAIL
REGARDLESS OF ABILITY TO REPAIR OR MITIGATE.

A FOLLOW-UP EMAIL REPORT WITH DIGITAL

PHOTOS WILL BE REQUIRED DAILY UNTIL

RESOLUTION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY CLIENT AND
AFFECTED SERVICE PROVIDERS AND RECIPIENTS.

AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, CONTRACTOR WILL

EXERCISE ALL EFFORTS TO HAVE REPAIRS MADE

BY QUALIFIED TECHNICIANS AS APPROVED BY
SERVICE PROVIDER.

NOTE TO CONTRACTOR:

CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SHALL BE SAWCUT TO THE

NEAREST SCORE MARK AND BE REPLACED EQUAL IN
DIMENSION TO THAT REMOVED.

NOTE:

CONTRACTOR TO ALLOW INGRESS AND EGRESS TO
DRIVEWAYS AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION.

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTE:

THE LOCATIONS AND EXISTENCE OF ANY

UNDERGROUND PIPES, STRUCTURES OR CONDUITS

SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH
OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. THERE MAY BE EXISTING
UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE

PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE

UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT
SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

N
LEGEND:

ELECTRIC
FIBER

OVERHEAD FIBER
SEWER
GAS
WATER
E
F
TELCO

STREET LIGHT

STORM DRAIN
NOTE:

FOR FIBER FACILITIES, MINIMUM

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM STORM
DRAIN & SEWER FACILITIES TO BE 5'
EDGE TO EDGE.

NOTE:

ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES PARALLEL WITH
WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 4' OF

LATERAL CLEARANCE IF THE PROPOSED

UTILITIES ARE INSTALLED AT THE SAME DEPTH
AS THE EXISTING WATER MAIN. IF THE
PROPOSED UTILITIES HAVE A MINIMUM 1'

VERTICAL CLEARANCE FROM THE EXISTING

WATER MAIN, THEN THE LATERAL CLEARANCE

BETWEEN THE PROPOSED UTILITIES AND THE
EXISTING WATER MAIN SHALL BE 2'.

NOTE:

ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES CROSSING WATER
MAINS SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 1'

VERTICAL CLEARANCE FROM THE WATER
MAIN. PLEASE PLAN ACCORDINGLY IN ORDER

TO MAINTAIN THE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE

PROPOSED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING
WATER MAINS.

NOTE:

CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE EXISTING STREET LIGHT
PULL BOXES AS NEEDED. 6
E-3

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
(1) 24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX FOR

FIBER (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
5 E-3
EXTENET TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL (1)
17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX FOR POWER

EXISTING OVER HEAD

STREET LIGHT POWER

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 2" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 1" RGC POWER CONDUIT

FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" FOR GLENDALE

STREET LIGHT POWER FEED

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (3) 1.25" HDPE FIBER CONDUITS

FROM PULL BOX TO SITE POLE AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 30"

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±45'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

PULL BOX TO PULL BOX AT A MINIMUM
DEPTH OF 36"

EXISTING UTILITY WOOD
POLE #TBD TO BE UTILIZED
FOR POWER P.O.C.

EXTENET TO EXCAVATE &
INSTALL (1) 17" X 30" X 24"

PULL BOX FOR POWER
5 E-3

CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE & INSTALL
±5'-0" OF (1) 3" SCH. 80 CONCRETE

ENCASED PVC POWER CONDUIT FROM

UTILITY POLE TO PULL BOX AT A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 36"
EXTENET TO INSTALL (1) 3" RIGID RISER
AS SPOTTED BY GWP. CONTRACTOR TO
INSTALL CONDUIT 10FT UP POLE

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
E-2
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 03/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM &

PANEL SCHEDULE

ELECTRICAL
2 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, 2019 CEC AND ALL
APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES.

2. CONDUIT ROUTINGS ARE SCHEMATIC. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL

INSTALL CONDUITS SO THAT ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT IS NOT
BLOCKED.

3. WIRING, RACEWAY AND SUPPORT METHODS AND MATERIALS

SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC AND
TELCORDIA.

4. ALL CIRCUITS SHALL BE SEGREGATED AND MAINTAIN MINIMUM CABLE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY THE NEC AND TELCORDIA.

5. CABLES SHALL NOT BE ROUTED THROUGH LADDER-STYLE
CABLE TRAY RUNGS.

6. EACH END OF EVERY POWER, POWER PHASE CONDUCTOR (I.E., HOTS), GROUNDING, AND T1 CONDUCTOR AND CABLE SHALL BE

LABELED WITH COLOR-CODED INSULATION OR ELECTRICAL
TAPE (3M BRAND, 1/2 INCH PLASTIC ELECTRICAL TAPE WITH UV PROTECTION, OR EQUAL). THE IDENTIFICATION METHOD SHALL
CONFORM WITH NEC & OSHA.

7. ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY LABELED
WITH ENGRAVED LAMACOID PLASTIC LABELS. ALL EQUIPMENT

SHALL BE LABELED WITH THEIR VOLTAGE RATING, PHASE

CONFIGURATION, WIRE CONFIGURATION, POWER OR AMPACITY
RATING, AND BRANCH CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS (I.E., PANELBOARD AND CIRCUIT ID'S).

8. PANELBOARDS (ID NUMBERS) AND INTERNAL CIRCUIT

BREAKERS (CIRCUIT ID NUMBERS) SHALL BE CLEARLY LABELED
WITH ENGRAVED LAMACOID PLASTIC LABELS.

9. ALL TIE WRAPS SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH APPROVED CUTTING TOOL TO REMOVE SHARP EDGES. POWER, CONTROL, AND

EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING IN TUBING OR CONDUIT SHALL BE
SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#14 AWG OR LARGER), 600 V, OIL
RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B STRANDED COPPER
CABLE RATED FOR 90 °C (WET AND DRY) OPERATION; LISTED OR

LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND RACEWAY SYSTEM USED,
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

10. SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRING LOCATED
INDOORS SHALL BE SINGLE CONDUCTOR (#6 AWG OR LARGER),
600 V, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2 GREEN INSULATION,
CLASS B STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90 °C (WET AND
DRY) OPERATION; LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION AND
RACEWAY SYSTEM USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

11. POWER AND CONTROL WIRING, NOT IN TUBING OR CONDUIT, SHALL BE MULTI-CONDUCTOR, TYPE TC CABLE (#14 AWG OR
LARGER), 600 V, OIL RESISTANT THHN OR THWN-2, CLASS B
STRANDED COPPER CABLE RATED FOR 90 °C (WET AND DRY)
OPERATION; WITH OUTER JACKET; LISTED OR LABELED FOR THE LOCATION USED, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

12. ALL POWER AND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE

CRIMP-STYLE, COMPRESSION WIRE LUGS AND WIRENUTS BY
THOMAS AND BETTS (OR EQUAL). LUGS AND WIRENUTS SHALL
BE RATED FOR OPERATION AT NO LESS THAN 75°C (90°C IF
AVAILABLE).

13. RACEWAY AND CABLE TRAY SHALL BE LISTED OR LABELED FOR

ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA, UL, ANSI/IEEE,
AND NEC.

14. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT) OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E., RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40, OR RIGID PVC
SCHEDULE 80 FOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE)
SHALL BE USED FOR EXPOSED INDOOR LOCATIONS.

15. ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING (EMT), ELECTRICAL

NONMETALLIC TUBING (ENT), OR RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT
(RIGID PVC, SCHEDULE 40) SHALL BE USED FOR CONCEALED
INDOOR LOCATIONS.

16. GALVANIZED STEEL INTERMEDIATE METALLIC CONDUIT (IMC) SHALL BE USED FOR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS ABOVE GRADE.

17. RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT (I.E., RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR RIGID PVC SCHEDULE 80) SHALL BE USED UNDERGROUND;

DIRECT BURIED, IN AREAS OF OCCASIONAL LIGHT VEHICLE

TRAFFIC OR ENCASED IN REINFORCED CONCRETE IN AREAS OF
HEAVY VEHICLE TRAFFIC.

18. LIQUID-TIGHT FLEXIBLE METALLIC CONDUIT (LIQUID-TITE FLEX)

SHALL BE USED INDOORS AND OUTDOORS, WHERE VIBRATION
OCCURS OR FLEXIBILITY IS NEEDED.

19. CONDUIT AND TUBING FITTINGS SHALL BE THREADED OR
COMPRESSION-TYPE AND APPROVED FOR THE LOCATION USED.

SETSCREW FITTINGS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.

20. CABINETS, BOXES, AND WIREWAYS SHALL BE LISTED OR

LABELED FOR ELECTRICAL USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEMA,
UL, ANSI/IEEE, AND NEC.

21. WIREWAYS SHALL BE EPOXY-COATED (GRAY) AND INCLUDE A HINGED COVER, DESIGNED TO SWING OPEN DOWNWARD; SHALL
BE PANDUIT TYPE E (OR EQUAL); AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR
BETTER) INDOORS, OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS.

22. EQUIPMENT CABINETS, TERMINAL BOXES, JUNCTION BOXES,

AND PULL BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED OR EPOXY-COATED
SHEET STEEL, SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 50, AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS, OR NEMA 3R (OR BETTER) OUTDOORS

23. METAL DEVICE BOXES SHALL BE GALVANIZED, EPOXY-COATED, OR NON-CORRODING; SHALL MEET OR EXCEED UL 514A AND
NEMA OS 1; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS, OR
WEATHER PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS.

24. NONMETALLIC DEVICE BOXES SHALL MEET OR EXCEED NEMA
OS 2; AND RATED NEMA 1 (OR BETTER) INDOORS, OR WEATHER
PROTECTED (WP OR BETTER) OUTDOORS.

25. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN NECESSARY

AUTHORIZATION FROM THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE
COMMENCING WORK ON THE AC POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS.

26. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY TAGGING

ON THE BREAKERS, CABLES AND DISTRIBUTION PANELS IN

1. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND INSPECT THE

EXISTING FACILITY GROUNDING SYSTEM AND LIGHTNING

PROTECTION SYSTEM (AS DESIGNED AND INSTALLED) FOR

STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEC (AS ADOPTED BY THE AHJ),

THE SITE-SPECIFIC (UL, LPI, OR NFPA) LIGHTING PROTECTION

CODE, AND GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH TELCORDIA AND TIA
GROUNDING STANDARDS. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT

ANY VIOLATIONS OR ADVERSE FINDINGS TO THE CONTRACTOR
FOR RESOLUTION.

2. ALL GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS (INCLUDING

TELECOMMUNICATION, RADIO, LIGHTNING PROTECTION, AND AC

POWER GES'S) SHALL BE BONDED TOGETHER, AT OR BELOW

GRADE, BY TWO OR MORE COPPER BONDING CONDUCTORS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC.

3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM IEEE

FALL-OF-POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO EARTH TESTING (PER IEEE 1100 AND 81) FOR NEW GROUND ELECTRODE SYSTEMS. THE

SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL

GROUND ELECTRODES AS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A TEST RESULT
OF 5 OHMS OR LESS.

4. METAL RACEWAY SHALL NOT BE USED AS THE NEC REQUIRED
EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR. STRANDED COPPER

CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN INSULATION, SIZED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE NEC, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED WITH THE POWER CIRCUITS TO BTS EQUIPMENT.

5. EACH BTS CABINET FRAME SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO

THE MASTER GROUND BAR WITH GREEN INSULATED
SUPPLEMENTAL EQUIPMENT GROUND WIRES, 6 AWG STRANDED
COPPER OR LARGER FOR INDOOR BTS; 2 AWG STRANDED
COPPER FOR OUTDOOR BTS.

6. EXOTHERMIC WELDS SHALL BE USED FOR ALL GROUNDING
CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE.

7. APPROVED ANTIOXIDANT COATINGS (I.E., CONDUCTIVE GEL OR

PASTE) SHALL BE USED ON ALL COMPRESSION AND BOLTED
GROUND CONNECTIONS.

8. ALUMINUM CONDUCTOR OR COPPER CLAD STEEL CONDUCTOR
SHALL NOT BE USED FOR GROUNDING CONNECTIONS.

9. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL AND NON-ELECTRICAL METAL

BOXES, FRAMES AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE
GROUND RING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC.

10. METAL CONDUIT AND TRAY SHALL BE GROUNDED AND MADE

ELECTRICALLY CONTINUOUS WITH LISTED BONDING FITTINGS OR BY BONDING ACROSS THE DISCONTINUITY WITH 6 AWS COPPER
WIRE UL APPROVED GROUNDING TYPE CONDUIT CLAMPS.

ELECTRICAL NOTES GROUNDING NOTES

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
PANEL SCHEDULE 31
NOTE #1: CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE APPLICABILITY OF ELECTRIC SINGLE LINE AND WIRING PLAN. IF CONDITIONS EXIST THAT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO THE ELECTRIC

SINGLE LINE OR WIRING PLAN, CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER FOR A REVISED E SHEET.
1 1
2 (N) GWP U.G. INCOMING
ELECTRICAL SERVICE 2"C - 60A,
240V, 1Ø, 2W
2#10 AWG. CU.
1"C, 2#10, 1#6 E.G.
~5'
(N) 125A RATED METER CAN
(SEE SHEET D-2 FOR METER CAN

DETAILS)
NOTE: SEE WT GROUP SHEETS E-1 FOR SITE PLAN AND A-3
& A-4 FOR POLE EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS

VOLTAGE DROP TABLE
~5' L
2#12 AWG. CU. 20' L %VD = NEGL
NOTE #2: BREAKERS MUST COMPLY WITH AT LEAST CURVE (3) TRIPPING CHARACTERISTICS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH IEC/60934. 15A BREAKER SIZED FOR PSU INPUT CURRENT LIMITING SELECTOR SWITCH SET @ 8.5A.
(N) 3" U.G. CONDUIT ONLY
(CABLE BY GWP)
%VD = 0.27%
(N) PULL BOX
17" x 30" x 24"
10A, 2P
30A, 2P
3/4"C-1#8 GND
(N) (22,000 A.I.C.) PANEL "A"
(RSCAC-1333-P-240) MTD.

WITHIN POLE AT 6'
(SEE SHEET A-3 & A-4)

CADWELD TO

GROUND ROD

COPPER-CLAD GROUND
ROD 5/8"Ø x 10' L
N
SEE NOTE #2
10A, 2P
(3) ERICSSON PANEL

ANTENNAS W/
(3) INTEGRATED RRU'S
3/4"C-2#12

CONNECTED LOAD SUMMARY

METER/MAIN TOTAL CONNECTION LOAD
= 10A @ 240V, 1Ø, 2W
G
10A, 2P
(N) SERVICE METER TO BE

PROVIDED BY GWP

1. UTILITY POINTS OF SERVICE AND WORK / MATERIALS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON PRELIMINARY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES AND ARE FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANY FOR FINAL AND EXACT WORK / MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS AND CONSTRUCT TO UTILITY C OMPANY ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL CONDUIT, PULL ROPES, CABLES, PULL BOXES, CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF CONDUIT (IF REQUIRED), TRANSFORMER PAD, BARRIERS, POLE RISERS, TRENCHING, BACKFILL, PAY ALL UTILITY COMPANY FEES AND INCLUDE ALL REQUIREMENTS IN SCOPE OF WORK.

3. SEE WT GROUP SHEET G-1 FOR GROUNDING DETAILS.

4. SEE WT GROUP SHEET D-1 FOR EQUIPMENT DETAILS.

C
E
R
G
T
L
R
K
B
E
L
O
R
I
C
P
R
I
C
G
L
E
L
O
R
K
B
P
C
R
PHASE A =
(22,000 A.I.C.) PANEL "A"
30A BUS 240 VOLTS 1 PHASE 2 WIRE MAIN 30A - 2P TYPE NEMA 4X

VOLT AMPS

PHASE A

REMARK ET
500
500
RRU #1
RRU #3 2 10A
10A2 10A 2 RRU #2
REMARK

VOLT AMPS

PHASE A
500

NON-CONTINUOUS LOADS
0 W
TOTAL ADJUST WATT =
TOTAL ADJUST AMPS =
1875

7.8 A W/LCL
W1875x1.25=W1500

CONTINUOUS LOADS
500 W

VA/LINE
PHASE B = 1000 W

PHASE B PHASE B
(E) UTILITY WOOD
POLE #TBD
3/4"C-3#6 E.G.
2 DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
E-3
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 03/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

CONDUIT PLACEMENT

DETAILS

NOT USED
6 4
2 7BORE DETAIL (FIBER ONLY)
3 5
1 /g12024" X 36" X 18" VAULT

ARMORCAST,
A6001974TAPCX18
/g120LID TO BE MARKED
"EXTENET"
/g120LID TO BE

ARMORCAST,
A6001975TAPCX18
BOLTDOWN (4X)
35-7/8"
24-1/4"
38-1/8"
26-5/8"
18"

POLYMER CONCRETE
BOX

OPEN BASE

NON-SKID SURFACE

POLYMER CONCRETE
COVER

ARMORCAST LOGO
LIFT PIN (2X)
STD. MARKING
24" X 36" X 18" PULL BOX DETAIL
17" X 30" X 24" PULL BOX DETAIL
24"
30" MIN.

PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF

CONDUIT IS TO BE BY METHOD

OF DIRECTIONAL BORE
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
GRADE

TRENCH DETAIL (FIBER ONLY UNDER ASPHALT)
GRADE

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

NATIVE SOIL

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

EXISTING

CONCRETE

PARKWAY

TRENCH DETAIL (FIBER ONLY UNDER CONCRETE)

TRENCH DETAIL (FIBER ONLY UNDER DIRT/GRASS)

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

NATIVE SOIL

CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE
(COMPACT PRIOR TO RESURFACING)

EXISTING ROAD BASE MATERIAL

EXISTING PAVEMENT/CONCRETE

EXISTING ASPHALT

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

EXISTING

DIRT/GRASS

PARKWAY
GRADE

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

NATIVE SOIL
30" MIN. COVER
30" MIN. COVER
30" MIN. COVER
BEDDING (TYP.)
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
BEDDING (TYP.)
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
BEDDING (TYP.)
(3) 1.25" HDPE CONDUITS
(EXTENET FIBER)
GRADE
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
E-4
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 03/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

CONDUIT PLACEMENT

DETAILS

TRENCH DETAIL (POWER ONLY UNDER ASPHALT)
18" MIN. COVER (OFF STREET)
24" MIN. COVER (ON STREET)
36" MIN. COVER (GWP POWER)
GRADE

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

NATIVE SOIL

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
3 6 CONDUIT STUB-UP/TRENCH DETAIL
NOTES:

1. SIMILAR CONSTRUCTION FOR FEWER CONDUITS.

2. NO CUTS THROUGH THE EXISTING CONCRETE SHALL BE MADE. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE/REPAIR THE EXISTING SQUARE CUT SECTIONS ALONG THE NEW TRENCH.

3. BWP CONDUIT TO ENTER VERTICALLY (USE 90° SWEEP WITH MIN. 36" RADIUS. CONDUIT SHOULD TERMINATE 6" ABOVE GRAVEL AND 8" UNDERNEATH LID. DOT NOT CUT SWEEP.

CONCRETE SIDEWALK
(NOTE 2)
5 4'-0" MIN.

VARIES

TOP OF SIDEWALK

UNTREATED BASE
MATERIAL (TYP.)

BOTTOM OF
TRENCH

PVC/RIGID CONDUIT
PER PLAN 90° BEND MAX W/ 3'-0"

RADIUS PVC SWEEP

PULL BOX

EXISTING

CONCRETE

PARKWAY
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
TRENCH DETAIL (POWER ONLY UNDER CONCRETE) 41
TRENCH DETAIL (POWER ONLY UNDER DIRT/GRASS) 2
9 8
7TRENCH DETAIL (STREET LIGHTING UNDER CONCRETE)

TRENCH DETAIL (STREET LIGHTING UNDER DIRT/GRASS)
18" MIN. COVER (OFF STREET)
24" MIN. COVER (ON STREET)
36" MIN. COVER (GWP POWER)
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

NATIVE SOIL

CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE
(COMPACT PRIOR TO RESURFACING)

EXISTING ROAD BASE MATERIAL

EXISTING PAVEMENT/CONCRETE

EXISTING ASPHALT
18" MIN. COVER (OFF STREET)
24" MIN. COVER (ON STREET)
36" MIN. COVER (GWP POWER)

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

EXISTING

DIRT/GRASS

PARKWAY
GRADE

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

NATIVE SOIL
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
GRADE
18" MIN. COVER

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

EXISTING

DIRT/GRASS

PARKWAY
GRADE

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
BEDDING (TYP.)
(1) RGC CONDUIT
(GLENDALE STREET LIGHTING)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

NATIVE SOIL
GRADE

TRENCH WIDTH
12" MIN.

NATIVE SOIL

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)

EXISTING

CONCRETE

PARKWAY
18" MIN. COVER
BEDDING (TYP.)
(1) RGC CONDUIT
(GLENDALE STREET LIGHTING)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR

JOINT TRENCH DETAIL (POWER/FIBER UNDER DIRT/GRASS)

JOINT TRENCH DETAIL (POWER/FIBER UNDER ASPHALT)

JOINT TRENCH DETAIL (POWER/FIBER UNDER CONCRETE)
30" MIN. COVER
GRADE

TRENCH WIDTH
24" MIN.

BEDDING (TYP.)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

NATIVE SOIL
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
(1) 2" SCH. 40 PVC FIBER CONDUIT
(EXTENET FIBER)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT

CRUSHED AGGREGATE

BASE (COMPACT PRIOR

TO RESURFACING)

EXISTING ROAD BASE

MATERIAL

EXISTING PAVEMENT/

CONCRETE
42" MIN. COVER

TRENCH WIDTH
24" MIN.

EXISTING

DIRT/GRASS

PARKWAY
GRADE

NATIVE SOIL
30" MIN. COVER
BEDDING (TYP.)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
(1) 2" SCH. 40 PVC FIBER CONDUIT
(EXTENET FIBER)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
42" MIN. COVER
GRADE

TRENCH WIDTH
24" MIN.

NATIVE SOIL

EXISTING

CONCRETE

PARKWAY
30" MIN. COVER
BEDDING (TYP.)
SUBGRADE (TYP.)

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
(3.0 SACK WITH 3/8" PEA GRAVEL)
(1) 2" SCH. 40 PVC FIBER CONDUIT
(EXTENET FIBER)
(1) SCH. 80 PVC POWER CONDUIT
42" MIN. COVER

EXISTING ASPHALT
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
PROPOSED EXCAVATION.

REPLACE BASE & FINISHED SURFACE

EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EXISTING
& MUST BE TO THE SATISFACTION OF

PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR

BACKFILL
(ONE SACK SAND

SLURRY MIX)
12" MIN. HORIZONTAL

SEPARATION FROM POWER
12" MIN. HORIZONTAL

SEPARATION FROM POWER
12" MIN. HORIZONTAL

SEPARATION FROM POWER

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

REV
WTG
JKR
DATE DESCRIPTION INT.

SITE POLE # & ADDRESS

SHEET NUMBER
G-1
STAMP

SHEET NAME

SITE NAME

SITE NUMBER
SW-CA-GLENDA-00237C

HUB LOCATION
0 09/23/21 90% REVIEW WTG
Engineering /g121 Design /g121 Consulting
Engineering with Precision, Pace & Passion.

Structural | Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing
Civil | Land Survey | Telecommunication | Aquatic
Accessibility Consulting | Design & Program Management
COPYRIGHT 2023 THE W-T GROUP, LLC©
JOB#: T2100237
CA002_GLENDALE_137
GLENDALE, CA 91201
STRUCTURE ID: SL_6164

FRONT OF
1544 W KENNETH RD.

GLENDALE, CA 91201
SIGNED: 06/27/23EXPIRES: 03/31/24
1 11/11/22 UPDATED DYP
2 01/11/23 STRUCTURAL DYP
6671 S. Las Vegs Blvd. Ste. D210-271 | Las Vegas, NV 89119 wtgroup.com
3 02/21/23 1A DYP
4 04/12/23 GWP COMMENTS DYP

GROUNDING DIAGRAM,

NOTES AND DETAILS
1/16"
(TYP)
G G
G G G

G G G G
G

G G G G
G G G

GROUNDING BAR ON WALL,

FLOOR OR ANTENNA TOWER
(2) EXOTHERMIC TO BE USED
WITH #2 AWG SOLID BARE

TINNED COPPER GROUNDING

CONDUCTOR, EXOTHERMIC

WELD TO BE BURIED GROUNDING

RING AND GROUNDING BAR
PVC NONMETALLIC CONDUIT SCH 40

TYPE (NMC) CONDUIT WITH STRAP

WITHIN TWO INCHES OF CONDUIT END
#4 OR #6 AWG STRANDED CU

CONDUCTOR WITH GREEN,
600V, THWN-2 INSULATION
#2 AWG GREEN INSULATED

STRANDED COPPER WIRE
(EXISTING GROUNDING HALO)
T&B CO. "C-TAP", CAT. #54730,

CRIMP TYPE PARALLELED

TAP OR EQUIVALENT
#6 AWG GREEN INSULATED

STRANDED COPPER WIRE
(UNIT BOND)

DIRECTION OF BOND TO

TURN TO SHORTEST

DISTANCE TO MGB

TYPE SS TYPE TA

TYPE VB TYPE PH TYPE GR

TYPE PG

TYPE GT TYPE GY TYPE NC

TYPE LJ
TYPE HA TYPE VS TYPE NX1 TYPE ND

TYPE XA

TYPE GR TYPE GL LUG TYPE PC TYPE RR
BOLT GRND.

ROD CLAMP2 HOLE LUG
"U" BOLT PIPE
CLAMP
2 BOLT PARALLEL

SPLICER
1 BOLT PARALLEL
CLAMP

CROSS RUN
CLAMP
CAST "T" SPLICER

UNIVERSAL PIPE
CLAMPS 50H2

UNIVERSAL PIPE
CLAMPS 75/1.25
1 BOLT PARALLEL
CLAMP
GROUNDING NOTES:

1. THE CONDUIT ROUTING ARE DIAGRAMMATICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND ARE ONLY APPROXIMATIONS. THE EXACT LOCATION AND ROUTING SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED.

2. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY 'FUTURE CARRIER' WITH THE RESULTS

FROM PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND POST- CONSTRUCTION OHM TESTING (GROUNDING) RESULTS ON ALL MODIFIED CELL SITES AND AS REQUIRED BY 'FUTURE CARRIER' GROUNDING & BONDING STANDARD TP-76416.

3. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE TWO APPROVED "FALL OF POTENTIAL" TESTS. THE FIRST, WILL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO MAKING

CONNECTIONS AND THE SECOND WILL BE CONDUCTED AFTER THE FINAL

CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO NEW EQUIPMENT, THE SUPPLEMENTAL GROUNDING SYSTEM, AND THE EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM. THESE TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED TESTING AGENT. PROVIDE INDEPENDENT TEST RESULTS TO THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR REVIEW. THE GROUNDING SYSTEM RESISTANCE TO EARTH GROUNDING SHALL NOT EXCEED (5) OHMS. IF THE GROUNDING TEST EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM OF (5) OHMS, THE

SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL GROUNDING RODS AND CONNECTIONS AS REQUIRED TO MEET THE (5) OHMS' MAXIMUM.

4. THE INSPECTOR HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL INSPECT ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS FOR TIGHTNESS. EXOTHERMIC WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BEFORE BEING PERMANENTLY CONCEALED.

5. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STRAIN-RELIEF AND CABLE SUPPORTS FOR ALL CABLE ASSEMBLIES, COAX CABLES, AND RET CONTROL CABLES. CABLE STRAIN-RELIEF AND CABLE SUPPORTS SHALL BE APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSE.

INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL GROUND ALL EQUIPMENT. INCLUDING ANTENNAS,

RET MOTORS, DIPLEXER'S, TMA'S, COAX CABLES, AND RET CONTROL CABLES AS A COMPLETE SYSTEM. GROUNDING SHALL BE EXECUTED BY QUALIFIED WIREMEN

IN COMPLIANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS.

7. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLLING DEVICES SHALL BE

PROVIDED WITH ENGRAVED LAMICOID NAMEPLATES, INDICATING THE CIRCUITS ORIGINATION AND ALL EQUIPMENT TERMINATIONS.

8. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL BREAKERS, CONDUITS, CABLE TRAY,

AND CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS, AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED SYSTEM AND SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 5/8" X 10'-0" ,CU. GND ROD IN TEST
WELL 30" MIN. BELOW GRADE.

CHEMICAL GROUND ROD
(XIT GROUND ROD)
GROUNDING SYMBOLS:

CADWELD

CONNECTION

MECHANICAL

CONNECTION

HALO GROUND

CONNECTION

GROUND BAR

GROUNDING

G G G G G

GROUNDING BAR DETAIL GROUNDING LEGEND

GROUND WIRE CONNECTION

EXOTHERMIC CONNECTION

GROUNDING NOTES MECHANICAL CONNECTION GROUNDING DIAGRAM 1 2
3 4
5 6 8
G G

G G G G G
G

G G G G

NEW COPPER GROUND BAR

AT ANTENNA LOCATION
#8 AWG GREEN INSULATED

STRANDED COPPER WIRE, TO

GROUND BAR AT POLE

LOCATION
#6 AWG GREEN INSULATED
STRANDED COPPER WIRE, (TYP.)

NEW ANTENNA W/

INTEGRATED RRU
(TYP.)
GROUNDING DETAIL 7

CRUSHED ROCK
1-1/2" SYSTEM CONDUIT
2" DRAIN HOLE
1-1/2" SYSTEM CONDUIT
12" X 22" PULL BOX

PULL BOX LID SHALL BE INSCRIBED
"STREET LIGHTING"
1" RIGID GALVANIZED CONDUIT

FINISHED GRADE
6"
5/8" GROUND ROD

GROUND BUSBAR

GREEN COPPER

GROUND WIRE

AHZ Consulting Engineers
Raycap Pole Design
Prepared for Raycap – Verizon New Site Build

S I T E I N F O R M A T I O N
Address
Verizon Site Name
Raycap Project Number
Glendale, CA
ExtenetGlendale Poles Phase 2 (25ft Pole)
VZ22-01389H-29
NB+C Project Number 100111
Date December 16, 2022
NB+C Engineering Services, LLC
Prepared by: Ian Suppo
Respectfully Submitted by:

Arash Zandieh, P.E.

Principal Engineer
CA PE License #C82118

NB+C ES
6095 Marshalee Drive, Suite 300
Elkridge, MD 21075
Standard Calculation Sheet
Raycap|Stealth®
1 Date: 12/16/2022
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2.xmcd
100111

PURPOSE / ASSUMPTIONS
The purpose of these calculation is to design light pole located in Glendale, CA for supporting the new Verizon Wireless panel antennas. Contractor to verify the site specific conditions prior to fabrications)
Code - 2018 IBC and ANSI/TIA-222-H
Ultimate Windspeed - 95mph
Exposure Category - C
Site Class - II
Ice Thickness - 0in
Ice Windspeed - 30mph
Goetech Condition - Presumptive Soil Parameters provided by ANSI/TIA-222-H Anne x F
- Ground Wa ter ass umed at 1ft depth
- Neglected Soil depth - 2ft
Raycap Pole Mount Pole Design Summary :

Base Pole - 12" STD pipe stressed at 35.4%
Base Plate - 1.25" A36 thick base plate, 21"diame ter stressed at 37.9% Anchor Bolts - (4) 1.25" bolts with bolt center 17" stressed at 47.9% Foundation - 42" ϕ x 8' minimum embedment
Structural Analysis : Passing
Network Building + Consulting
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Job: ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Project: VZ22-01389H-29
Client: Raycap (100111) Drawn by: isuppo App'd:

Code: TIA-222-H Date: 12/13/22 Scale: NTS
Path:

R:\Blue Bell\Projects\Stealth Structural Design (26702)\ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2 (VZ22-01389H-29)\Structural\25ft\Analysis\tnx\ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2.eri Dwg No. E-1

27.8 ft

25.0 ft

0.0 ft
REACTIONS - 95 mph WINDTORQUE 1 kip-ft
1 K
SHEAR
13 kip-ft
MOMENT
3 K
AXIAL

SEISMIC
2 KSHEAR 40 kip-ftMOMENT
3 KAXIAL

ARE FACTOREDALL REACTIONS
Section 12 Size P 3.5 STDHSS12.75x.375 Length (ft) 2.8025.00 Grade A53-B35A500-42 Weight (K) 0.01.21.2 6705 Street Macro 26.92 6705 Street Macro 26.92 6705 Street Macro 26.92 CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB 26.92 CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB 26.92 CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB 26.92 CCISeismic T ower Section 1 - 1 26.4 Radome (16ø x 2.75ft) 26.29 CCISeismic stealth Radome (16ø x

2.75ft)

26.29 Street Light Arm 24 Street Light (3sq ft) 24 CCISeismic miscl Street Light (3sq ft) 24 CCISeismic miscl Street Light Arm 24 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (17.8ft
to27.8ft)

22.8 CCISeismic T ower Section 2 - 1 22.5 CCISeismic T ower Section 2 - 2 15 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (7.8ft
to17.8ft)

12.8 Enclosed Equipment (500 lbs) 6 CCISeismic stealth Enclosed Equipment (500 lbs)
6 CCISeismic T ower Section 2 - 3 5 CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (0ft
to7.8ft)

3.9DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING

TYPE TYPEELEVATION ELEVATION
6705 Street Macro 26.92
6705 Street Macro 26.92
6705 Street Macro 26.92
CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB 26.92
CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB 26.92
CCISeismic ericsson VZ-AIR6701 TB 26.92
CCISeismic T ower Section 1 - 1 26.4
Radome (16ø x 2.75ft) 26.29
CCISeismic stealth Radome (16ø x

2.75ft)

26.29 Street Light Arm 24
Street Light (3sq ft) 24
CCISeismic miscl Street Light (3sq ft) 24
CCISeismic miscl Street Light Arm 24
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A
(1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (17.8ft
to27.8ft)

22.8 CCISeismic T ower Section 2 - 1 22.5
CCISeismic T ower Section 2 - 2 15
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A
(1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (7.8ft
to17.8ft)

12.8 Enclosed Equipment (500 lbs) 6
CCISeismic stealth Enclosed
Equipment (500 lbs)
6 CCISeismic T ower Section 2 - 3 5
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci) LDF7-50A
(1-5/8 FOAM) From 0 to 27.8 (0ft
to7.8ft)

3.9 MATERIAL STRENGTH
GRADE GRADEFy FyFu Fu
A53-B35 35 ksi 60 ksi A500-42 42 ksi 58 ksi

TOWER DESIGN NOTES

1. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-H Standard.2. Tower designed for a 95 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-H Standard.

3. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind.

4. Tower Risk Category II.

5. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 ft

6. CCISeismic Note: Seismic loads generated by CCISeismic 3.3.57. CCISeismic Note: Seismic calculations are in accordance with TIA-222-H8. TOWER RATING: 24.4%

ttnnxxTToowweerr
Job
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Page
1 of 14
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Project
VZ22-01389H-29
Date
08:13:04 12/13/22
Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Client
Raycap (100111)
Designed by
isuppo

Tower Input Data

The tower is a monopole.

This tower is designed using the TIA-222-H standard.

The following design criteria apply:

Tower base elevation above sea level: 561.00 ft.

Basic wind speed of 95 mph.

Risk Category II.

Exposure Category C.

Simplified Topographic Factor Procedure for wind speed-up calculations is used.

Topographic Category: 1.

Crest Height: 0.00 ft.

Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph.

CCISeismic Note: Seismic loads generated by CCISeismic 3.3.5.

CCISeismic Note: Seismic calculations are in accordance with TIA -222-H.

A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used.

Pressures are calculated at each section.

Stress ratio used in pole design is 1.

Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feed line supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered.

Pole Section Geometry

Section Elevation

ft
Section
Length
ft
Pole
Size

Pole
Grade
Socket Length
ft
L1 27.80-25.00 2.80 P 3.5 STD A53-B35
(35 ksi)

L2 25.00-0.00 25.00 HSS12.75x.375 A500-42
(42 ksi)

Tower
Elevation

ft
Gusset
Area
(per face)

ft2
Gusset
Thickness

in
Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor
Af
Adjust.

Factor
Ar
Weight Mult.

Double Angle
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Diagonals
in
Double Angle
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Horizontals
in
Double Angle
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Redundants
in
L1 27.80-25.00 1 1 1
L2 25.00-0.00 1 1 1

Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area

Description Face
or
Leg
Allow
Shield
Exclude
From
Torque
Calculation
Component
Type
Placement

ft
Total
Number
CAAA

ft2/ft
Weight

plf
LDF7-50A (1-5/8
FOAM)
B No Yes Inside Pole 27.80 - 0.00 6 No Ice 0.00 0.82

ttnnxxTToowweerr
Job
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Page
2 of 14
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Project
VZ22-01389H-29
Date
08:13:04 12/13/22
Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Client
Raycap (100111)
Designed by
isuppo

Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas

Tower
Section
Tower
Elevation
ft
Face AR

ft2
AF

ft2
CAAA
In Face
ft2
CAAA
Out Face
ft2
Weight

K
L1 27.80-25.00 A
B
C

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.00 0.01

0.00 L2 25.00-0.00 A
B
C

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.00 0.12

0.00 User Defined Loads - Seismic

Description Elevation

ft
Offset
From
Centroid
ft
Azimuth
Angle

°
Ev

K
Ehx

K
Ehz

K
Eh

K
CCISeismic Tower Section 1 - 1 26.40 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.05 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 - 1 22.50 0.00 0.0000 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.38 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 - 2 15.00 0.00 0.0000 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.50 CCISeismic Tower Section 2 - 3 5.00 0.00 0.0000 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.17 CCISeismic ericsson
VZ-AIR6701 TB

26.92 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.06
CCISeismic ericsson
VZ-AIR6701 TB

26.92 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.06
CCISeismic ericsson
VZ-AIR6701 TB

26.92 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.06
CCISeismic stealth Radome (16ø
x 2.75ft)

26.29 0.00 0.0000 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.19
CCISeismic stealth Enclosed
Equipment (500 lbs)

6.00 0.00 0.0000 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.22
CCISeismic miscl Street Light
(3sq ft)

24.00 0.00 0.0000 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.12
CCISeismic miscl Street Light
Arm

24.00 0.00 0.0000 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.14
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to 27.8 (17.8ft to27.8ft)

22.80 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.08
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to 27.8 (7.8ft to17.8ft)

12.80 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.05
CCISeismic (6) andrew (cci)
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) From
0 to 27.8 (0ft to7.8ft)

3.90 0.00 0.0000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01

Discrete Tower Loads

ttnnxxTToowweerr
Job
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Page
3 of 14
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Project
VZ22-01389H-29
Date
08:13:04 12/13/22
Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Client
Raycap (100111)
Designed by
isuppo
Description Face
or
Leg
Offset
Type
Offsets:

Horz
Lateral
Vert
ft
ft
ft
Azimuth
Adjustment

°
Placement

ft
CAAA
Front

ft2
CAAA
Side

ft2
Weight

K
6705 Street Macro C From Leg 0.50

0.00 0.00

0.0000 26.92 No Ice 1.09 0.83 0.03
6705 Street Macro A From Leg 0.50

0.00 0.00

0.0000 26.92 No Ice 1.09 0.83 0.03
6705 Street Macro B From Face 0.50

0.00 0.00

0.0000 26.92 No Ice 1.09 0.83 0.03
Radome (16ø x 2.75ft) C From Leg 0.50

0.00 0.00

0.0000 26.29 No Ice 1.83 1.83 0.10
Enclosed Equipment (500 lbs) C From Leg 0.50

0.00 0.00

0.0000 6.00 No Ice 0.00 0.00 0.50
Street Light (3sq ft) C From Leg 7.00

0.00 0.00

0.0000 24.00 No Ice 3.00 3.00 0.07
Street Light Arm C From Leg 6.00

0.00 0.00

0.0000 24.00 No Ice 3.67 3.67 0.08

Force Totals

Load
Case
Vertical
Forces

K
Sum of
Forces
X
K
Sum of
Forces
Z
K
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mx
kip-ft
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mz
kip-ft
Sum of Torques

kip-ft
Leg Weight 1.18
Bracing Weight 0.00
Total Member Self-Weight 1.18 0.80 1.41
Total Weight 2.16 0.80 1.41
Wind 0 deg - No Ice 0.00 -0.59 -9.93 1.30 -0.92
Wind 30 deg - No Ice 0.30 -0.51 -8.55 -4.05 -0.54
Wind 60 deg - No Ice 0.51 -0.30 -4.66 -7.93 -0.01
Wind 90 deg - No Ice 0.59 -0.00 0.68 -9.31 0.52
Wind 120 deg - No Ice 0.51 0.29 6.06 -7.82 0.91
Wind 150 deg - No Ice 0.29 0.51 10.03 -3.85 1.06
Wind 180 deg - No Ice -0.00 0.59 11.52 1.53 0.92
Wind 210 deg - No Ice -0.30 0.51 10.14 6.87 0.54
Wind 240 deg - No Ice -0.51 0.30 6.26 10.76 0.01
Wind 270 deg - No Ice -0.59 0.00 0.91 12.14 -0.52
Wind 300 deg - No Ice -0.51 -0.29 -4.47 10.65 -0.91
Wind 330 deg - No Ice -0.29 -0.51 -8.44 6.68 -1.06
Total Weight 2.16 0.80 1.41
Wind 0 deg - Service 0.00 -0.25 -3.52 1.37 -0.33
Wind 30 deg - Service 0.13 -0.22 -2.96 -0.78 -0.19
Wind 60 deg - Service 0.22 -0.13 -1.40 -2.35 -0.00
Wind 90 deg - Service 0.25 -0.00 0.76 -2.90 0.19
Wind 120 deg - Service 0.21 0.12 2.92 -2.31 0.32
Wind 150 deg - Service 0.12 0.21 4.51 -0.71 0.38

ttnnxxTToowweerr
Job
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Page
4 of 14
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Project
VZ22-01389H-29
Date
08:13:04 12/13/22
Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Client
Raycap (100111)
Designed by
isuppo
Load
Case
Vertical
Forces

K
Sum of
Forces
X
K
Sum of
Forces
Z
K
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mx
kip-ft
Sum of
Overturning
Moments, Mz
kip-ft
Sum of Torques

kip-ft
Wind 180 deg - Service -0.00 0.25 5.11 1.45 0.33
Wind 210 deg - Service -0.13 0.22 4.55 3.61 0.19
Wind 240 deg - Service -0.22 0.13 2.99 5.17 0.00
Wind 270 deg - Service -0.25 0.00 0.84 5.73 -0.19
Wind 300 deg - Service -0.21 -0.12 -1.33 5.13 -0.32
Wind 330 deg - Service -0.12 -0.21 -2.92 3.54 -0.38
Seismic Vertical 0.62
Seismic Horizontal 0 deg 0.00 -2.08 -37.97 0.00 0.00
Seismic Horizontal 30 deg 1.04 -1.80 -32.88 -18.99 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 60 deg 1.80 -1.04 -18.99 -32.88 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 90 deg 2.08 0.00 0.00 -37.97 0.00
Seismic Horizontal 120 deg 1.80 1.04 18.99 -32.88 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 150 deg 1.04 1.80 32.88 -18.99 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 180 deg 0.00 2.08 37.97 0.00 0.00
Seismic Horizontal 210 deg -1.04 1.80 32.88 18.99 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 240 deg -1.80 1.04 18.99 32.88 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 270 deg -2.08 0.00 0.00 37.97 0.00
Seismic Horizontal 300 deg -1.80 -1.04 -18.99 32.88 0.00 Seismic Horizontal 330 deg -1.04 -1.80 -32.88 18.99 0.00

Load Combinations

Comb.

No.

Description
1 Dead Only
2 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg - No Ice
3 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg - No Ice
4 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg - No Ice
5 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg - No Ice
6 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg - No Ice
7 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg - No Ice
8 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg - No Ice
9 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg - No Ice
10 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg - No Ice
11 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg - No Ice
12 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg - No Ice
13 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg - No Ice
14 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg - No Ice
15 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg - No Ice
16 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg - No Ice
17 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg - No Ice
18 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg - No Ice
19 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg - No Ice
20 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg - No Ice
21 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg - No Ice
22 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg - No Ice
23 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg - No Ice
24 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 deg - No Ice
25 0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 deg - No Ice
26 Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
27 Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service
28 Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service
29 Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service
30 Dead+Wind 120 deg - Service
31 Dead+Wind 150 deg - Service
32 Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service

ttnnxxTToowweerr
Job
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Page
5 of 14
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Project
VZ22-01389H-29
Date
08:13:04 12/13/22
Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Client
Raycap (100111)
Designed by
isuppo
Comb.

No.

Description
33 Dead+Wind 210 deg - Service
34 Dead+Wind 240 deg - Service
35 Dead+Wind 270 deg - Service
36 Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service
37 Dead+Wind 330 deg - Service
38 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 0 deg
39 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 0 deg
40 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 30 deg
41 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 30 deg
42 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 60 deg
43 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 60 deg
44 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 90 deg
45 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 90 deg
46 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 120 deg
47 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 120 deg
48 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 150 deg
49 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 150 deg
50 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 180 deg
51 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 180 deg
52 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 210 deg
53 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 210 deg
54 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 240 deg
55 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 240 deg
56 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 270 deg
57 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 270 deg
58 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 300 deg
59 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 300 deg
60 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 330 deg
61 0.9 Dead-1.0 Ev+1.0 Eh 330 deg

Maximum Member Forces

Section
No.

Elevation
ft
Component
Type
Condition Gov.

Load
Comb.

Axial

K
Major Axis
Moment
kip-ft
Minor Axis
Moment
kip-ft
L1 27.8 - 25 Pole Max Tension 19 0.00 -0.00 -0.00
Max. Compression 42 -0.33 -0.50 0.31
Max. Mx 56 -0.33 0.73 -0.02
Max. My 50 -0.33 0.07 -0.67
Max. Vy 56 -0.42 0.73 -0.02
Max. Vx 50 0.42 0.07 -0.67
Max. Torque 2 0.02
L2 25 - 0 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max. Compression 42 -3.21 -31.34 18.12
Max. Mx 56 -3.21 39.86 -0.96
Max. My 50 -3.21 1.71 -39.12
Max. Vy 56 -2.09 32.05 -0.96
Max. Vx 50 2.09 1.71 -31.30
Max. Torque 24 1.06

Maximum Reactions

Location Condition Gov.

Load
Comb.

Vertical
K
Horizontal, X
K
Horizontal, Z
K

ttnnxxTToowweerr
Job
ExtenetGlendale PolesPhs2
Page
6 of 14
NB+C
6095 Marshalee Dr.

Project
VZ22-01389H-29
Date
08:13:04 12/13/22
Elkridge, MD 21075
Phone: (410) 712-7092
FAX:

Client
Raycap (100111)
Designed by
isuppo
Location Condition Gov.

Load
Comb.

Vertical
K
Horizontal, X
K
Horizontal, Z
K
Pole Max. Vert 42 3.21 -1.80 1.04
Max. Hx 57 1.32 2.08 0.00
Max. Hz 39 1.32 -0.00 2.08
Max. Mx 39 37.33 -0.00 2.08
Max. Mz 45 36.77 -2.08 0.00
Max. Torsion 24 1.06 0.29 0.51
Min. Vert 55 1.32 1.80 -1.04
Min. Hx 45 1.32 -2.08 0.00
Min. Hz 51 1.32 -0.00 -2.08
Min. Mx 50 -39.12 -0.00 -2.08
Min. Mz 56 -39.86 2.08 0.00
Min. Torsion 12 -1.06 -0.29 -0.51

Tower Mast Reaction Summary

Load
Combination
Vertical

K
Shearx

K
Shearz

K
Overturning
Moment, Mx
kip-ft
Overturning
Moment, Mz
kip-ft
Torque

kip-ft
Dead Only 2.16 0.00 -0.00 0.80 1.42 -0.00

1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg - No
Ice

2.59 0.00 -0.59 -9.81 1.59 -0.92

0.9 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg - No
Ice

1.94 0.00 -0.59 -10.04 1.16 -0.92

1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg - No
Ice

2.59 0.30 -0.51 -8.42 -3.78 -0.54