Cities Index.
Agenda packet, first session

Glendale City Council
January 30, 2024

Document
Agenda packet, first session
Meeting
January 30, 2024
Body
Glendale City Council
Pages
30
Original file
92.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on glendaleca.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

RECORD OF DECISION
Me
eting Date August 10, 2023 DRB Case No. PDR-000210-2022 A
ddress 1900 Riverside Drive
A
pplicant Richard Dell
P
roject Summary:

T
he applicant is proposing to demolish the existing commercial stable buildings and associated structures (originally developed in 1939) and construct three new buildings with 15 surface parking spaces for a commercial stable and kennel on a 44,682 square- foot (SF) corner lot (pending alley vacation approval), located in the CE (Commercial Equestrian) Zone. The project includes a new 1-story, 4,224 SF barn with 16 stables, a 1-story, 4,793 SF building to be used as a kennel, an outdoor corral, and a 630 SF accessory building. The project site is currently 39,985 SF and the project scope includes a future application to vacate an existing alley at the rear of the site. The total lot size after the alley vacation will be 44,682 SF.

D
esign Review:

Board Member Motion Second Yes No Absent Abstain
Kaskanian X
Lockareff X X
Simonian X X
Tchaghayan X
Welch X
Totals 5 0
DRB Decision Approve with conditions.

Conditions:

1. T
he applicant shall obtain approval of an Alley Vacation prior to the issuance of a building permit.

Exhibit 4
262 of 561

1900 Riverside Drive
PDR-000210-2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

2. The window design shall be a simulated divided light window that features an exterior grid.

3. The window frame type and edge detail shall be identified on the window schedules with vertical and horizontal window section details provided for each window type that shows recess, sill, and frame, and external grids as applicable.

4. The parking areas and pedestrian walkways shall include decorative paving materials with consideration given to permeable paving options to help reduce stormwater runoff.

5. The applicant shall submit an exterior lighting proposal with fixtures that are consistent with the style of the development for review by staff prior to plan check submittal.

6. The applicant shall provide corner details that illustrate how the different cladding wraps the building corners.

7. The proposed vinyl cupolas shall be revised to a higher quality material such as wood or metal.

Determination of Compatibility: Site Planning

The proposed site planning is appropriate to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons:

• There are a limited number of stable and kennel uses located in the City, and the proposed stable/kennel is an appropriate re-use/redevelopment of the existing stable .The proposed site planning is driven by the operationally necessities of the use, the City’s Design Guidelines for suburban commercial corridors, and the development standards for the CE zone, which unlike other commercial zones, includes a minimum 25’-0” street-front setback requirement. • The proposed building locations comply with the City’s Design Guidelines where, in suburban commercial corridors, buildings can be located near the front of the lot with parking behind (stable and accessory building), or toward the back of the lot with parking in front (kennel).
• The subject property is a corner lot with the kennel sited as near the corner as possible while still complying with the street-front setback requirement. New landscaping along Riverside Drive and the unimproved portion of Allen Avenue provides an appropriate buffer from the public right-of-way. • The project includes two surface parking areas that are appropriately screened with landscaping and have a total of 15 parking spaces. A condition of approval requires that the parking areas and pedestrian walkways include decorative paving materials.
263 of 561

1900 Riverside Drive
PDR-000210-2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

o Similar to the existing corner condition, there is a surface parking area with 12 parking spaces that is located at the front of the site with an entrance that is accessed from Riverside Drive and exits onto Allen Avenue. o An additional three parking spaces are located at the rear of the lot and accessed from Allen Avenue.
• New drought-tolerant landscaping is proposed along both street frontages, as well as in the rear parking lot area. At the center of the lot is a new 6,604 SF outdoor corral that will be surfaced in decomposed granite.

Determination of Compatibility: Mass and Scale

The proposed massing and scale are appropriate to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons:

• The nearby residential buildings range from one to two stories in height and, with the exception of 1820 Riverside Drive located one block to the south, the equestrian-use related buildings are primarily one-story, with multiple buildings on-site. The proposed project fits within this neighborhood massing context. • The project design is driven by the needs of the proposed use as a stable and kennel. While the design guidelines discourage long, continuous segments of building walls along the street, for this project, the elongated rectangular buildings for the animals are appropriate and consistent with the use and the surrounding neighborhood.
• All of the proposed buildings will be one-story, and range in height from 14 feet to 20 feet, which is compatible to the surrounding neighborhood. • The design incorporates building forms with varied roof heights that range from 14 to 20 feet, with cupolas appropriately incorporated into the design of the new buildings.

Determination of Compatibility: Design and Detailing

The proposed design and detailing are appropriate to the site and its surroundings for the following reasons:

• Overall, the finish materials reinforce the architectural concept of the new buildings and are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
• The exterior finish materials consist of horizontal wood siding for the stable, board and batten hardie panel siding for the kennel and support building, standing seam metal roofing.
264 of 561

1900 Riverside Drive
PDR-000210-2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

• While the design of the stable differs from the other buildings, the materials are similar, with the buildings are tied together through the use of the same color palette of primarily off-white buildings, gray metal roofing, and black detailing (window trim, railings, gutters, fascia, wood posts, etc.). • Walkways are proposed within the interior of the site that appropriately connect the new buildings, with the primary entrance to the site taken from Riverside Drive.

DRB Staff Member Vista Ezzati, Senior Planner

Notes:

Contact the case planner for an appointment for a DRB stamp prior to submittal for plan check.

The Design Review Board approves the design of project only. Approval of a project by the Design Review Board does not constitute an approval of compliance with the Zoning Code and/or Building Code requirements.

If an appeal is not filed within the 15-day appeal period of the Design Review Board decision, plans may be approved for Building Division plan check. Prior to Building Division plan check submittal, Design Review Board approved plans must be stamped approved by the Design Review staff.

Any changes to the approved plans may constitute returning to the Design Review Board for approval. Prior to Building Division plan check submittal, all changes in substantial conformance with approved plans by the Design Review Board must be on file with the Planning Division.

265 of 561

Exhibit 5
KARAPEDIAN FAMILY RANCHVICIITY PHOTO SURVEY A-1.1
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
GLENDALE, CA 91201
DATE:

PROJECT NUMBER
01/20/2023
558.2101.03
266 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 267 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 268 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 269 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 270 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 271 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 272 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 273 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 274 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 275 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 276 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 277 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 278 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 279 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 280 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 281 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 282 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 283 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 284 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.03
J A N U A R Y 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH
DATE:

SCALE:
1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201BUILDING #: SITEVICINITYPHOTOSURVEY 285 of 561

Exhibit 6

INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION

PROJECT CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS
Project
Address: 1900 Riverside Drive
Project
Case No.: PDR-000210-2022
If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

NOTE: Your comments should address, within your area of authority, concerns and potentially significant adverse physical changes to the environment regarding the project. You may also identify code requirements specific to the project, above and beyond your normal requirements. Applicant will be informed early in the development process.

You may review complete plans, maps and exhibits in our office, MSB Room 103. We appreciate your consideration and look forward to your timely comments. Please do not recommend APPROVAL or DENIAL. For any questions, please contact the Case Planner ASAP, so as not to delay the case processing.

COMMENTS:
 This office DOES NOT have any comment.
 This office HAS the following comments/conditions.  (See attached Dept. Master List) Date: March 27, 2023
Print Name: Amirah Limayo
Title: Senior Administrative Analyst Dept: Community Services & Parks Tel: (818) 548-2057 a. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
 1. This project is subject to appropriate provisions of the Public Use Facilities Development Impact Fee Ordinance which requires that fees be paid to offset impacts on parks, recreation and library facilities. Developer should complete the Development Impact Fee forms for staff to calculate the appropriate amount of the fee due based upon the net new square footage and/or new units added.
b. CASE SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: (these are not standard code requirements)  1.
c. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS: (may or may not be adopted by the Hearing Officer)  1.

Revised 19 JANUARY 2023 --VE 3
286 of 561

INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION

PROJECT CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS
Project
Address: 1900 Riverside Drive
Project
Case No.: PDR-000210-2022
If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

NOTE: Your comments should address, within your area of authority, concerns and potentially significant adverse physical changes to the environment regarding the project. You may also identify code requirements specific to the project, above and beyond your normal requirements. Applicant will be informed early in the development process.

You may review complete plans, maps and exhibits in our office, MSB Room 103. We appreciate your consideration and look forward to your timely comments. Please do not recommend APPROVAL or DENIAL. For any questions, please contact the Case Planner ASAP, so as not to delay the case processing.

COMMENTS:
 This office DOES NOT have any comment.
This office HAS the following comments/conditions. (See attached Dept. Master List) Date: May 24, 2023
Print Name: Dave Stimson
Title: Principal Fire/Environment Specialist Dept.: Fire Tel.: 818-937-7707 a. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

1. Automatic fire sprinkler system to provide complete sprinkler protection throughout.

2. Fire flow test (1500 GPM @ 20 psi).

3. Fire alarm system to provide complete protection throughout, including but not limited to fire extinguishers, exit signs, emergency lighting, and a Knox box.

4. Fuel modifications and landscape plans will be required.

5. Fire department access.
b. CASE SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: (these are not standard code requirements)  1.
c. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS: (may or may not be adopted by the Hearing Officer)  1.

Revised 19 JANUARY 2023 --VE 3
287 of 561

4/27/23, 1:15 PM Plan Check 4806

CITY OF GLENDALE

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
DATE:

TO:

April 12, 2023
Vista Ezzati, Planner, Community Development Department FROM: Leo Chan, GWP Water Engineering
Daniel Scorza, GWP Electric Engineering
SUBJECT: Design Review Board Application PDR-000210-2022 1900 Riverside Drive (APN: 5625-031-008)
Glendale Water & Power (GWP) Engineering has reviewed the plans.

Requirements are as follows:

Electric Engineering
Customer Service (818) 548-3921
Project to contact GWP Customer Service Engineering to determine electric service requirements before starting the permitting process. Final construction plans must incorporate the electric service plan information for GWP Electric Engineering to sign off the building plan application.

Project to pay all fees required for obtaining electric service before application(s) for building or electric permit(s) is/are signed by GWP Customer Service Engineering.

Project to provide electric service - size, single line diagram and electric load calculation per National Electric Code (NEC).

Project is responsible for supporting and maintaining of GWP owned poles, overhead power lines and underground conduits, power lines and any other appurtenances in a safe and as-is condition.

Additional comment(s) and/or attachment(s).

Please provide Contact Information for Property Owner and Designer or Electrician to GWP Electric Service Planning at [email protected] or by phone at 818-548-3921.

Notice: It is taking approximately 14 weeks for a service planner to contact owner, designer, or electrician once we received the required information to set an appointment to visit site.

Fiber Optics (818) 548-3923
No conflict.

Street Lighting (818) 548-4877
No Conflict
Transmission & Distribution (818) 548-3923
The existing electrical facilities (vaults, pull boxes, power poles, etc.) shall be protected in place and be accessible to GWP personnel at all times.

Project personnel are responsible for maintaining a ten foot (10’) radial clearance from all overhead electrical lines during construction, including construction equipment. If the ten foot (10’) radial clearance cannot be met, contact GWP Electrical Engineering Department to determine the appropriate actions. Any work required by GWP to maintain proper clearance shall be done at the project's expense.

Water Engineering
Recycled Water (818) 548-2062
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4806&space=1 1/3 288 of 561

4/27/23, 1:15 PM Plan Check 4806
No conflict.

Backflow Prevention (818) 548-2062
Backflow prevention (BFP) devices are required for the following water services:

Potable Water, Commercial
Potable Water, Irrigation
Potable Water, Fire
See BFP requirements below:

Backflow prevention (BFP) devices are required for each service connection(s) listed above from the City of Glendale, per the GWP Cross-Connection Control Program and Glendale Municipal Code (Chapter 13.32). BFP device locations must be approved by both GWP and Planning Departments prior to installation. All BFP’s are required to be installed as close as practical to the point of connection for meter service/water distribution system protection on the domestic, irrigation, and fire services. Installation of the BFP’s must meet the 12” MIN – 36” MAX above finished street grade, 24” minimum front clearance, 12” minimum back and side clearance, and in a manner where it is readily accessible for inspection, testing and maintenance. The backflow installation must be inspected prior to burying or covering the pipes to confirm no cross-connection exists. GWP will also need to inspect the installed facilities prior to receiving service to ensure adequate backflow protection. The BFP device must be tested immediately upon installation and annually thereafter by a certified tester licensed by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (626) 430-5290 before service can be granted. A list of approved backflow prevention assemblies can be found at www.usc.edu/dept/fccchr/list.html.

A separate fire line is required for this project. A Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) is required to be installed as close as practical to the point of connection and the property line. Customer must submit plans to GWP Cross-Connection Control Program showing the location, size, manufacturer, and model number of the approved DCDA. Please refer to the City of Glendale’s Standard Detail Drawing 6561-A for installation requirements. Please contact GWP’s Cross-Connection Control Program (818)-937-8948 for approval of BFP installation location, questions and scheduling a final inspection. (PER CA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 17 & CITY OF GLENDALE ORD NO. 5678)
A Reduced Pressure Principle (RP) Backflow Prevention Assembly is required to be installed as close as practical to the potable service for multi-family (4 units +), commercial and irrigation use. A RP Backflow Prevention Assembly is required to be installed as close as practical to the recycled water service for dual plumbed, commercial and irrigation use. Customer must submit plans to GWP Cross-Connection Control Program showing the location, size, manufacturer, and model number of the approved RP. Please refer to the City of Glendale’s Standard Detail Drawing 6528-A for installation requirements. Please contact GWP’s Cross- Connection Control Program (818)-937-8948 for approval of BFP installation location, questions and scheduling a final inspection. (PER CA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 17 & CITY OF GLENDALE ORD NO. 5678) Additional comment(s) and/or attachment(s).

Please insert STD Detail Drawings 6561-A, 6528-A & 6762-A on plans and specify location/manf/model/size of backflow prevention assembly and adhere to clearance requirements. All backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed at street grade and as close as practical to property line/service connection. Please visit the USC list of approved backflow prevention assemblies’ website http://www.usclist.com/ to determine which assemblies' may be approved. SUB-LEVEL INSTALLATIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.

Potable Water (818) 548-2062
Developer is responsible for the current cost of a water service or fire line installation in accordance with the current water fee schedule.

A complete set of plumbing plans and fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to GWP Water Engineering for review and approval prior to request of new domestic water service and new fire line respectively Any water service or fire line connection, when no longer needed by the customer, must be permanently abandoned (disconnected at water main and water meter removed) by GWP following payment of the necessary fee.
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4806&space=1 2/3 289 of 561

4/27/23, 1:15 PM Plan Check 4806
Any water service or fire line shall have a separate connection to the potable water main. A single connection that combines domestic and fire protection uses is not allowed.

Fire Department approval/exemption shall be obtained when determining if existing fire flow is adequate. The applicant shall pay the cost of any necessary fire or domestic water services and recycled water service to the property, as well as offsite water facility improvements necessary to provide fire flow as required by the Glendale Fire Department.

All water facilities shall be protected in place during construction of the subject project. All water valves, water meter boxes, water vaults and fire hydrants must be relocated and set to finished grade when necessary at project's expense.

Please add the following to the General Notes: All water facilities shall be protected in place during construction of the subject project. All water valves, water meter boxes, water vaults and fire hydrants must be relocated and set to finished grade when necessary at project’s expense. Please contact GWP Water Engineering at (818) 548-2062 prior to construction.

A complete set of plans shall be submitted for review to GWP Water Engineering.

Daniel Scorza Leo Chan
Chief Assistant General Manager Senior Civil Engineer
DS/LC:fg/sb
gwpmappingprod2/Reports/PlanCheck/memopipprintable.cfm?planckno=4806&space=1 3/3 290 of 561

INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION

PROJECT CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS
Project
Address: 1900 Riverside Drive
Project
Case No.: PDR-000210-2022
If project comments are not received by the due date, it will be assumed that your department has no comments.

NOTE: Your comments should address, within your area of authority, concerns and potentially significant adverse physical changes to the environment regarding the project. You may also identify code requirements specific to the project, above and beyond your normal requirements. Applicant will be informed early in the development process.

You may review complete plans, maps and exhibits in our office, MSB Room 103. We appreciate your consideration and look forward to your timely comments. Please do not recommend APPROVAL or DENIAL. For any questions, please contact the Case Planner ASAP, so as not to delay the case processing.

COMMENTS:
 This office DOES NOT have any comment.
 This office HAS the following comments/conditions. (See attached Dept. Master List) Date:____4/6/23_______________
Print Name:____Loren Klick___________________________
Title:___Urban Forester_Dept._PWMS___________Tel.:__x3416____________ a. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
 1.

Forestry has reviewed a set of plans dated February 2010 and have the following comments and recommendations:

Relevant Municipal Code Requirements
Indigenous Tree Ordinance (GMC 12.44)
Glendale Municipal Code requires all persons to submitting accurate plans showing exact locations of each protected indigenous tree in the subject area and on adjoining properties whose trunks or branches are located twenty (20) feet outside the subject property line.

There is one California sycamore (Platanus racemosa) within 20’ of the project, but this tree is located within the City of Los Angeles, and is therefore not subject to GMC 12.44.

Street Tree Ordinance (GMC 12.40)
Glendale Municipal Code requires a Street Tree Permit prior to any site disturbance to or near street trees.

There are no existing City street trees adjacent to the project site, and due to limited space and the angle of the roadway near the traffic signal, Public Works will not require the planting of any trees at this time.

Requirements:

1. Per GMC 12.44, add the following note regarding Indigenous Trees to the project site plan:
“Protected oak, sycamore, bay trees on the property and within 20’ of the property are inaccessible to the proposed construction activity and will experience NO impact. No protective fencing is required.”
b. CASE SPECIFIC CODE REQUIREMENTS: (these are not standard code requirements)  1.

Revised 19 JANUARY 2023 --VE 3
291 of 561

292 of 561

CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New Kennel and Stable Development
June 2023

Page 1 of 4 ends

PROJECT LOCATION: 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 91201 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolish the existing commercial stable buildings and structures, and construct three new buildings with 16 surface parking spaces for a commercial stable and kennel.

Development of the site includes a new 1-story, 4,224 square-foot (SF) barn with 16 stables, a new 1-story 4,793 SF building to be used as a kennel, a new outdoor corral, a new one-story, 630 SF accessory building, and an alley vacation. The project site is a 36,699 SF corner lot located in the CE – Commercial Equestrian Zone.

CEQA REVIEW: The proposed commercial project, located at 1900 Riverside Drive, is exempt from CEQA as a Class 32 “In-fill Development Projects” exemption, pursuant to § 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines.

CCR § 15300.2. Exceptions
(c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

There are no unusual circumstances associated with the project site. The project is located on the southwest corner of Riverside Drive and Allen Avenue, with a 20-foot-wide alley located at the rear, and is located in an urban environment with similar and complimentary uses in the immediate project vicinity. The site consists of four contiguous lots that are bisected by a vacated alley, and the topography is relatively flat. Currently, there are three stable buildings on-site, an existing one-story house originally built in 1942 that are currently vacant, and a one-story barn originally built in 1939. At a hearing held on March 7, 2023, the Glendale City Council determined that based on the evidence in the record, the subject property is not a historic resource under CEQA. All existing buildings and structures, as well as associated parking lots will be demolished as part of the project. The property is zoned CE (Commercial Equestrian), and the proposed commercial stable and kennel use is permitted in this zone.

Furthermore, the project complies with the zoning standards in terms for floor area, setbacks, height, landscaping and parking. While the project site is located in a liquefaction zone, based on the proposed use as a commercial stable and kennel, the building code does not require a liquefaction study to be prepared. The Building and Safety division will require a full soils report to be prepared and submitted for review as part of the building permit process. As indicated in the City’s Safety Element, the project site is not within a landslide hazard zone, dam inundation zone, fault hazard zone or fire hazard zone.

CCR § 15332. In-fill Development Projects Exemption
Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in this section.
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

The proposed commercial stable and kennel use w ill be consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the project site as Community Services Commercial, and the proposed use is consistent with its land use designation. The CE zone is designed to encourage and support the development of equestrian related activities and other related uses with performance standards imposed to promote compatibility with surrounding land uses. The proposed commercial stable and kennel Exhibit 7
293 of 561

CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New Kennel and Stable Development
June 2023

Page 2 of 4 ends

use are permitted by right in the CE zone and will provide a compatible, complimentary amenity/use for individuals visiting the city and its residents. The Land Use Element is the most directly related to the approval of this use. All other elements of the General Plan will not be impacted as a result of the project. The project site has not been slated for open space or recreation, and will operate within compliance with the Noise Element thresholds. The Circulation Element identifies Riverside Drive as a Community Collector and Allen Avenue as a local street. Riverside Drive is fully developed and can adequately handle the traffic circulation around the site. The portion of Allen Avenue that abuts the subject property is currently 280 feet in length and currently undeveloped. The applicant will be required to comply with any requirements for street and sidewalk improvements as required by the Public Works Department, Engineering Division. Primary vehicular access to the site will be from the existing driveway location along Riverside Drive, with a secondary driveway entrance along Allen Avenue from the rear of the property. Additionally, the City’s Traffic Engineer reviewed the project and determined that no significant increase in traffic would occur as a result of the project, as it would not generate a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips to and from the site. The project complies with the applicable zoning designation and regulations and no variances are required.

(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

With the proposed alley vacation, the project site is approximately 36,699 SF (0.84 acres) and complies with the site size criteria. Located in the CE Zone, the project site is substantially surrounded by urban uses and within city limits.

(c) The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The project is located in an area that has been heavily urbanized for decades. Natural vegetation does not exist on-site. The site is surrounded by commercial and multi-family residential uses and is unsuitable for use as a wildlife habitat due to its location. No wildlife species other than those which can tolerate human activity and/or are typically found in urban environments are known to exist on or near the project site. These human-tolerant species are neither sensitive, threatened, nor endangered. Implementation of the project would not result in any impact to species identified as endangered, threatened, sensitive or being of special concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. In addition, the project site does not provide suitable habitat for endangered or rare species given the pattern, type, and level of development in the area.

(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

Traffic
There would be an increase in daytime traffic as a result of the construction activities. However, this increase is not considered substantial since the construction phases is short-term. A Construction Traffic Management Plan will be required to be submitted to the City’s Public Works Department for review and approval prior to project construction. The Construction Traffic Management Plan will include a Construction Traffic Control Plan, a Construction Parking Plan, a Haul Routes Plan, and construction hours. The project site is served by two streets:

Riverside Drive and Allen Avenue. The City’s Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposed project and determined that no significant increase in the number of vehicle trips would occur as a 294 of 561

CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New Kennel and Stable Development
June 2023

Page 3 of 4 ends

result of the project (less than 50 net peak-hour trips). The project is exempt from a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis because it is considered a redevelopment project that is replacing an existing use that is similar in nature. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.

Noise
The project involves the demolition of the existing commercial stable buildings and structures, and construction of three new buildings for a commercial stable and kennel, an outdoor coral, and 16-surface parking spaces. The site is bordered by Riverside Drive to the north, unimproved Allen Avenue to the east, and a public alley to the south. The proposed use as a commercial stable and kennel is permitted by right on the subject property zoned CE, and complies with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. As shown in the City’s Noise Element, the project site is located within the 60-65 dB noise contour, and the proposed use is normally acceptable in this area. The new project would be constructed to reduce interior noise to acceptable levels as required by the building code, and the project is not anticipated to generate noise in excess of limits contained in the Noise Element. Construction associated with the project will be required to comply with the City of Glendale Noise Ordinance (GMC Chapter

8.36), which prohibits construction activities between the hours of 7:00 PM on one day and 7:00 AM of the next day or from 7:00 PM on Saturday to 7:00 AM on Monday or from 7:00 PM preceding a holiday. Compliance with the City’s noise ordinance would ensure that noise impacts will be less than significant.

Air Quality
The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0) was used to estimate air quality impacts during the construction and operation stages of the project. Results from the model indicate that the proposed project would not exceed thresholds for construction, area, or operational impacts. No impacts would occur. Based on the model run, construction and operation of the project would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

Water Quality
Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established regulations under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control direct storm water discharges. In the City of Glendale, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCQB) administers the NPDES permitting program and is responsible for developing NPDES permitting requirements. The NPDES program regulates industrial pollutant discharges that include construction activities.

Implementation of the proposed project will require compliance with all of the NPDES requirements including the submittal and certification of plans and details showing both construction and post-construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are integrated into the design of the project. The submittal of a Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), as approved by the City Engineer, will also be required to be integrated into the design of the project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project is not expected to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface of groundwater quality since the project will be required to comply with applicable permitting requirements.

(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

295 of 561

CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New Kennel and Stable Development
June 2023

Page 4 of 4 ends

The project site is currently developed with a commercial stable use and is surrounded by similar complementary uses and multi-family residential development. The site is located in an urbanized area and can be adequately served by existing public facilities.

Section 65995 of the Government Code provides that school districts can collect a fee on a per square foot basis for new commercial buildings to assist in the construction of or addition to schools. The State has determined that payment of the school fee mitigates impacts to schools to a level less than significant.

The Glendale Police Department provides police services to the project site. The overall need for police protection services are not expected to increase significantly as a result of the proposed project as the site is located in an already urbanized area.

The City of Glendale Fire Department provides fire and paramedic services to the project site.

The project will be required to comply with the Uniform Fire Code, including installation of fire sprinklers, and to submit plans to the Glendale Fire Department at the time building permits are submitted to ensure adequate fire flow protection.

296 of 561

1900 Riverside Stable
South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics - To demolish a 422 SF and 9,104 SF buildings (horse stables), and 536 SF and 3,224 SF operation buildings (14,286 SF total) and to construct 4,223 SF horse stable, 253 SF storage, 4,795 SF Kennel, and a 630 SF support building.

Land Use - 9,901 SF of Recreational Use (Horse stables, kennels, storage, and operational offices) and approximately 3,500 SF of asphalt surface parking lots.

Construction Phase - Demolition/site prep (1 month, 1 week), grading (1 month), construction (1 year), paving (1 month) and architectural coating (1 month).

Grading - grading will constist of 1,000 cubic yards of cut/fill (balanced grading onsite) on a 1.02 Acrea parcel.

Demolition - demolition of 4 buildings (14,286 SF total)

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Other Asphalt Surfaces

3.50 1000sqft

0.08 3,500.00
0 Racquet Club

41.10 1000sqft

0.94 9,901.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company
Glendale Water and Power
2025
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
948.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
41,100.00
9,901.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber

0.00 250.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 1 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 297 of 561

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2024

0.1492

1.2081

1.3211

2.4800e-
003

0.0390

0.0489

0.0880

0.0140

0.0470

0.0610

0.0000
208.4593
208.4593

0.0351

2.0100e-
003
209.9370
2025

0.0632

0.1323

0.1751

3.1000e-
004

1.5100e-
003

5.2300e-
003

6.7400e-
003

4.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
003

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

25.7682

25.7682

4.7900e-
003

7.0000e-
005

25.9093
Maximum

0.1492

1.2081

1.3211

2.4800e-
003

0.0390

0.0489

0.0880

0.0140

0.0470

0.0610

0.0000
208.4593
208.4593

0.0351

2.0100e-
003
209.9370
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2024

0.1492

1.2081

1.3211

2.4800e-
003

0.0390

0.0489

0.0880

0.0140

0.0470

0.0610

0.0000
208.4590
208.4590

0.0351

2.0100e-
003
209.9368
2025

0.0632

0.1323

0.1751

3.1000e-
004

1.5100e-
003

5.2300e-
003

6.7400e-
003

4.0000e-
004

5.0000e-
003

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

25.7682

25.7682

4.7900e-
003

7.0000e-
005

25.9093
Maximum

0.1492

1.2081

1.3211

2.4800e-
003

0.0390

0.0489

0.0880

0.0140

0.0470

0.0610

0.0000
208.4590
208.4590

0.0351

2.0100e-
003
209.9368
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 2 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 298 of 561

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 3-18-2024
6-17-2024

0.4661

0.4661
2 6-18-2024
9-17-2024

0.4136

0.4136
3 9-18-2024
12-17-2024

0.4093

0.4093
4 12-18-2024
3-17-2025

0.2601

0.2601
Highest

0.4661

0.4661

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.0407

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Energy

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

55.7733

55.7733

1.7900e-
003

3.7000e-
004

55.9281
Mobile

0.2462

0.2561

2.1833

4.5100e-
003

0.4909

3.4100e-
003

0.4943

0.1310

3.1700e-
003

0.1342

0.0000
417.3458
417.3458

0.0309

0.0205
424.2253
Waste

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

47.5547

0.0000

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Water

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.7712

20.7491

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Total

0.2879

0.2649

2.1912

4.5600e-
003

0.4909

4.0700e-
003

0.4950

0.1310

3.8300e-
003

0.1348

48.3259
493.8694
542.1952

2.9231

0.0228
622.0713
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 3 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 299 of 561

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

0.0407

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Energy

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

55.7733

55.7733

1.7900e-
003

3.7000e-
004

55.9281
Mobile

0.2462

0.2561

2.1833

4.5100e-
003

0.4909

3.4100e-
003

0.4943

0.1310

3.1700e-
003

0.1342

0.0000
417.3458
417.3458

0.0309

0.0205
424.2253
Waste

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

47.5547

0.0000

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Water

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.7712

20.7491

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Total

0.2879

0.2649

2.1912

4.5600e-
003

0.4909

4.0700e-
003

0.4950

0.1310

3.8300e-
003

0.1348

48.3259
493.8694
542.1952

2.9231

0.0228
622.0713
Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
3/18/2024
4/12/2024
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
4/13/2024
4/16/2024
5 2
3 Grading
Grading
4/17/2024
4/22/2024
5 4
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 4 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 300 of 561

4 Building Construction
Building Construction
4/23/2024
1/27/2025
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
1/28/2025
2/10/2025
5 10
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/11/2025
2/24/2025
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 6.00
9 0.56
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.29 Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Forklifts
1 6.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 6.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,852; Non-Residential Outdoor: 4,951; Striped Parking Area: 210 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 5 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 301 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

7.0300e-
003

0.0000

7.0300e-
003

1.0600e-
003

0.0000

1.0600e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0144

0.1389

0.1349

2.4000e-
004

6.3100e-
003

6.3100e-
003

5.8900e-
003

5.8900e-
003

0.0000

21.0916

21.0916

5.3400e-
003

0.0000

21.2250
Total

0.0144

0.1389

0.1349

2.4000e-
004

7.0300e-
003

6.3100e-
003

0.0133

1.0600e-
003

5.8900e-
003

6.9500e-
003

0.0000

21.0916

21.0916

5.3400e-
003

0.0000

21.2250
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
5 13.00

0.00 65.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 250.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 6.00

2.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 1.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 6 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 302 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

7.0000e-
005

4.1500e-
003

1.1300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

1.8282

1.8282

1.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

1.9173
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.8000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.9500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.0836

1.0836

3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.0922
Total

4.5000e-
004

4.4300e-
003

5.0800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.0200e-
003

5.3000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9117

2.9117

1.3000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

3.0095
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

7.0300e-
003

0.0000

7.0300e-
003

1.0600e-
003

0.0000

1.0600e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0144

0.1389

0.1349

2.4000e-
004

6.3100e-
003

6.3100e-
003

5.8900e-
003

5.8900e-
003

0.0000

21.0915

21.0915

5.3400e-
003

0.0000

21.2250
Total

0.0144

0.1389

0.1349

2.4000e-
004

7.0300e-
003

6.3100e-
003

0.0133

1.0600e-
003

5.8900e-
003

6.9500e-
003

0.0000

21.0915

21.0915

5.3400e-
003

0.0000

21.2250
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 7 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 303 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

7.0000e-
005

4.1500e-
003

1.1300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

5.6000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

5.9000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000

1.8282

1.8282

1.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

1.9173
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.8000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.9500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.4300e-
003

3.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.0836

1.0836

3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.0922
Total

4.5000e-
004

4.4300e-
003

5.0800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.0200e-
003

5.3000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

2.9117

2.9117

1.3000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

3.0095
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.2700e-
003

0.0000

6.2700e-
003

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1100e-
003

0.0118

6.6300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.8000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.5113

1.5113

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5235
Total

1.1100e-
003

0.0118

6.6300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.2700e-
003

4.8000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

3.0000e-
003

4.4000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

0.0000

1.5113

1.5113

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5235
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 8 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 304 of 561

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0667

0.0667

0.0000

0.0000

0.0672
Total

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0667

0.0667

0.0000

0.0000

0.0672
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

6.2700e-
003

0.0000

6.2700e-
003

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

3.0000e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1100e-
003

0.0118

6.6300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.8000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

0.0000

1.5113

1.5113

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5235
Total

1.1100e-
003

0.0118

6.6300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

6.2700e-
003

4.8000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

3.0000e-
003

4.4000e-
004

3.4400e-
003

0.0000

1.5113

1.5113

4.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.5235
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 9 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 305 of 561

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0667

0.0667

0.0000

0.0000

0.0672
Total

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0667

0.0667

0.0000

0.0000

0.0672
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0142

0.0000

0.0142

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6000e-
003

0.0276

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

1.1400e-
003

1.0500e-
003

1.0500e-
003

0.0000

3.6207

3.6207

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6500
Total

2.6000e-
003

0.0276

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

0.0142

1.1400e-
003

0.0153

6.8500e-
003

1.0500e-
003

7.9000e-
003

0.0000

3.6207

3.6207

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6500
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 10 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 306 of 561

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

2.6000e-
004

0.0159

4.3300e-
003

7.0000e-
005

2.1500e-
003

1.1000e-
004

2.2700e-
003

5.9000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

7.0000e-
004

0.0000

7.0315

7.0315

4.0000e-
004

1.1200e-
003

7.3744
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.2000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1667

0.1667

0.0000

0.0000

0.1680
Total

3.2000e-
004

0.0160

4.9400e-
003

7.0000e-
005

2.3700e-
003

1.1000e-
004

2.4900e-
003

6.5000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

7.1982

7.1982

4.0000e-
004

1.1200e-
003

7.5424
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0142

0.0000

0.0142

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

6.8500e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

2.6000e-
003

0.0276

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

1.1400e-
003

1.0500e-
003

1.0500e-
003

0.0000

3.6207

3.6207

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6500
Total

2.6000e-
003

0.0276

0.0174

4.0000e-
005

0.0142

1.1400e-
003

0.0153

6.8500e-
003

1.0500e-
003

7.9000e-
003

0.0000

3.6207

3.6207

1.1700e-
003

0.0000

3.6500
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 11 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 307 of 561

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

2.6000e-
004

0.0159

4.3300e-
003

7.0000e-
005

2.1500e-
003

1.1000e-
004

2.2700e-
003

5.9000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

7.0000e-
004

0.0000

7.0315

7.0315

4.0000e-
004

1.1200e-
003

7.3744
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

6.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.2000e-
004

0.0000

2.2000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.1667

0.1667

0.0000

0.0000

0.1680
Total

3.2000e-
004

0.0160

4.9400e-
003

7.0000e-
005

2.3700e-
003

1.1000e-
004

2.4900e-
003

6.5000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

7.1982

7.1982

4.0000e-
004

1.1200e-
003

7.5424
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1285

1.0013

1.1328

2.0000e-
003

0.0408

0.0408

0.0394

0.0394

0.0000
164.3582
164.3582

0.0274

0.0000
165.0425
Total

0.1285

1.0013

1.1328

2.0000e-
003

0.0408

0.0408

0.0394

0.0394

0.0000
164.3582
164.3582

0.0274

0.0000
165.0425
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 12 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 308 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

1.9000e-
004

6.9300e-
003

2.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.1800e-
003

3.3000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.1750

3.1750

1.1000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

3.3150
Worker

1.5800e-
003

1.1600e-
003

0.0165

5.0000e-
005

5.9600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.9900e-
003

1.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.6100e-
003

0.0000

4.5260

4.5260

1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

4.5619
Total

1.7700e-
003

8.0900e-
003

0.0191

8.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

7.1700e-
003

1.9100e-
003

7.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

0.0000

7.7009

7.7009

2.2000e-
004

5.7000e-
004

7.8769
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1285

1.0013

1.1328

2.0000e-
003

0.0408

0.0408

0.0394

0.0394

0.0000
164.3580
164.3580

0.0274

0.0000
165.0423
Total

0.1285

1.0013

1.1328

2.0000e-
003

0.0408

0.0408

0.0394

0.0394

0.0000
164.3580
164.3580

0.0274

0.0000
165.0423
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 13 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 309 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

1.9000e-
004

6.9300e-
003

2.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.1800e-
003

3.3000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000

3.1750

3.1750

1.1000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

3.3150
Worker

1.5800e-
003

1.1600e-
003

0.0165

5.0000e-
005

5.9600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.9900e-
003

1.5800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.6100e-
003

0.0000

4.5260

4.5260

1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

4.5619
Total

1.7700e-
003

8.0900e-
003

0.0191

8.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
003

7.0000e-
005

7.1700e-
003

1.9100e-
003

7.0000e-
005

1.9800e-
003

0.0000

7.7009

7.7009

2.2000e-
004

5.7000e-
004

7.8769
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0126

0.0989

0.1182

2.1000e-
004

3.7300e-
003

3.7300e-
003

3.6000e-
003

3.6000e-
003

0.0000

17.2551

17.2551

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

17.3255
Total

0.0126

0.0989

0.1182

2.1000e-
004

3.7300e-
003

3.7300e-
003

3.6000e-
003

3.6000e-
003

0.0000

17.2551

17.2551

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

17.3255
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 14 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 310 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3272

0.3272

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

0.3417
Worker

1.6000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.3000e-
004

0.0000

6.3000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.4589

0.4589

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4625
Total

1.8000e-
004

8.3000e-
004

1.8900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.5000e-
004

0.0000

7.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.7861

0.7861

2.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.8041
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0126

0.0989

0.1182

2.1000e-
004

3.7300e-
003

3.7300e-
003

3.6000e-
003

3.6000e-
003

0.0000

17.2550

17.2550

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

17.3255
Total

0.0126

0.0989

0.1182

2.1000e-
004

3.7300e-
003

3.7300e-
003

3.6000e-
003

3.6000e-
003

0.0000

17.2550

17.2550

2.8200e-
003

0.0000

17.3255
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 15 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 311 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

0.0000

1.2000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

0.0000

4.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.3272

0.3272

1.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

0.3417
Worker

1.6000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

1.6200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.3000e-
004

0.0000

6.3000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

0.0000

1.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.4589

0.4589

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4625
Total

1.8000e-
004

8.3000e-
004

1.8900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.5000e-
004

0.0000

7.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.1000e-
004

0.0000

0.7861

0.7861

2.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.8041
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.8700e-
003

0.0266

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.2300e-
003

1.1400e-
003

1.1400e-
003

0.0000

5.8868

5.8868

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9334
Paving

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.9700e-
003

0.0266

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.2300e-
003

1.1400e-
003

1.1400e-
003

0.0000

5.8868

5.8868

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9334
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 16 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 312 of 561

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.8000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.8400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5233

0.5233

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.5274
Total

1.8000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.8400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5233

0.5233

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.5274
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

2.8700e-
003

0.0266

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.2300e-
003

1.1400e-
003

1.1400e-
003

0.0000

5.8868

5.8868

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9334
Paving

1.0000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

2.9700e-
003

0.0266

0.0440

7.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.2300e-
003

1.1400e-
003

1.1400e-
003

0.0000

5.8868

5.8868

1.8700e-
003

0.0000

5.9334
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 17 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 313 of 561

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.8000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.8400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5233

0.5233

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.5274
Total

1.8000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

1.8400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.1000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5233

0.5233

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.5274
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.0464

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.5000e-
004

5.7300e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Total

0.0472

5.7300e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 18 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 314 of 561

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0403

0.0403

0.0000

0.0000

0.0406
Total

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0403

0.0403

0.0000

0.0000

0.0406
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

0.0464

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.5000e-
004

5.7300e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Total

0.0472

5.7300e-
003

9.0500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

2.6000e-
004

0.0000

1.2766

1.2766

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.2784
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 19 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 315 of 561

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0403

0.0403

0.0000

0.0000

0.0406
Total

1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

5.0000e-
005

0.0000

6.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.0000e-
005

0.0000

0.0403

0.0403

0.0000

0.0000

0.0406
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 20 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 316 of 561

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.2462

0.2561

2.1833

4.5100e-
003

0.4909

3.4100e-
003

0.4943

0.1310

3.1700e-
003

0.1342

0.0000
417.3458
417.3458

0.0309

0.0205
424.2253
Unmitigated

0.2462

0.2561

2.1833

4.5100e-
003

0.4909

3.4100e-
003

0.4943

0.1310

3.1700e-
003

0.1342

0.0000
417.3458
417.3458

0.0309

0.0205
424.2253

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Racquet Club
576.63
877.49
715.14
1,303,889
1,303,889
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
576.63
877.49
715.14
1,303,889
1,303,889
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Racquet Club

16.60 8.40

6.90 11.50

69.50 19.00
52 39
9 Other Asphalt Surfaces

16.60 8.40

6.90 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Racquet Club

0.541709

0.062136

0.185590

0.128486

0.023783

0.006533

0.012157

0.009216

0.000814

0.000497

0.024669

0.000753

0.003657
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.541709

0.062136

0.185590

0.128486

0.023783

0.006533

0.012157

0.009216

0.000814

0.000497

0.024669

0.000753

0.003657

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 21 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 317 of 561

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

46.2841

46.2841

1.6100e-
003

2.0000e-
004

46.3825
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

46.2841

46.2841

1.6100e-
003

2.0000e-
004

46.3825
NaturalGas
Mitigated

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

9.4893

9.4893

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.5457
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

9.4893

9.4893

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.5457

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 22 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 318 of 561

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
177822

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

9.4893

9.4893

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.5457
Total

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

9.4893

9.4893

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.5457
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
177822

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

9.4893

9.4893

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.5457
Total

9.6000e-
004

8.7200e-
003

7.3200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

6.6000e-
004

0.0000

9.4893

9.4893

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

9.5457
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 23 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 319 of 561

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
107525

46.2841

1.6100e-
003

2.0000e-
004

46.3825
Total

46.2841

1.6100e-
003

2.0000e-
004

46.3825
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
107525

46.2841

1.6100e-
003

2.0000e-
004

46.3825
Total

46.2841

1.6100e-
003

2.0000e-
004

46.3825
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 24 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 320 of 561

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

0.0407

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Unmitigated

0.0407

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

4.6400e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0360

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Total

0.0407

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 25 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 321 of 561

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

4.6400e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0360

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

5.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Total

0.0407

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

1.1100e-
003

1.1100e-
003

0.0000

0.0000

1.1800e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 26 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 322 of 561

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Unmitigated

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club

2.43078 /

1.48983

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Total

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 27 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 323 of 561

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club

2.43078 /

1.48983

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Total

21.5203

0.0799

1.9600e-
003

24.1019
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Unmitigated

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 28 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 324 of 561

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
234.27

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Total

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
234.27

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Total

47.5547

2.8104

0.0000
117.8147
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 29 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 325 of 561

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:34 AM

Page 30 of 30 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 326 of 561

1900 Riverside Stable
South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics - To demolish a 422 SF and 9,104 SF buildings (horse stables), and 536 SF and 3,224 SF operation buildings (14,286 SF total) and to construct 4,223 SF horse stable, 253 SF storage, 4,795 SF Kennel, and a 630 SF support building.

Land Use - 9,901 SF of Recreational Use (Horse stables, kennels, storage, and operational offices) and approximately 3,500 SF of asphalt surface parking lots.

Construction Phase - Demolition/site prep (1 month, 1 week), grading (1 month), construction (1 year), paving (1 month) and architectural coating (1 month).

Grading - grading will constist of 1,000 cubic yards of cut/fill (balanced grading onsite) on a 1.02 Acrea parcel.

Demolition - demolition of 4 buildings (14,286 SF total)

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Other Asphalt Surfaces

3.50 1000sqft

0.08 3,500.00
0 Racquet Club

41.10 1000sqft

0.94 9,901.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company
Glendale Water and Power
2025
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
948.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
41,100.00
9,901.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber

0.00 250.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 1 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 327 of 561

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

1.4854

21.4004

14.0245

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9175

3.7540

0.5930

4.3357

0.0000
5,965.221
1 5,965.221
1 0.8669

0.6177
6,170.962
8 2025

9.4497

10.4957

12.6496

0.0230

0.1453

0.3933

0.4731

0.0385

0.3793

0.4007

0.0000
2,095.765
5 2,095.765
5 0.4140

6.6900e-
003
2,105.993
2 Maximum

9.4497

21.4004

14.0245

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9175

3.7540

0.5930

4.3357

0.0000
5,965.221
1 5,965.221
1 0.8669

0.6177
6,170.962
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

1.4854

21.4004

14.0245

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9175

3.7540

0.5930

4.3357

0.0000
5,965.221
1 5,965.221
1 0.8669

0.6177
6,170.962
8 2025

9.4497

10.4957

12.6496

0.0230

0.1453

0.3933

0.4731

0.0385

0.3793

0.4007

0.0000
2,095.765
5 2,095.765
5 0.4140

6.6900e-
003
2,105.993
2 Maximum

9.4497

21.4004

14.0245

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9175

3.7540

0.5930

4.3357

0.0000
5,965.221
1 5,965.221
1 0.8669

0.6177
6,170.962
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 2 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 328 of 561

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 3 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 329 of 561

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Energy

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Mobile

1.9851

1.7823

16.5811

0.0353

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,595.442
1 3,595.442
1 0.2486

0.1632
3,650.287
0 Total

2.2135

1.8301

16.6258

0.0356

3.7705

0.0294

3.7998

1.0048

0.0276

1.0323
3,652.767
6 3,652.767
6 0.2497

0.1642
3,707.953
7 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Energy

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Mobile

1.9851

1.7823

16.5811

0.0353

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,595.442
1 3,595.442
1 0.2486

0.1632
3,650.287
0 Total

2.2135

1.8301

16.6258

0.0356

3.7705

0.0294

3.7998

1.0048

0.0276

1.0323
3,652.767
6 3,652.767
6 0.2497

0.1642
3,707.953
7 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 4 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 330 of 561

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
3/18/2024
4/12/2024
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
4/13/2024
4/16/2024
5 2
3 Grading
Grading
4/17/2024
4/22/2024
5 4
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
4/23/2024
1/27/2025
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
1/28/2025
2/10/2025
5 10
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/11/2025
2/24/2025
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 6.00
9 0.56
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.29 Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,852; Non-Residential Outdoor: 4,951; Striped Parking Area: 210 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 5 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 331 of 561

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Forklifts
1 6.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 6.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
5 13.00

0.00 65.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 250.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 6.00

2.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 1.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 6 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 332 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

0.7031

0.0000

0.7031

0.1065

0.0000

0.1065

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.6311

0.6311

0.5895

0.5895
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Total

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.7031

0.6311

1.3342

0.1065

0.5895

0.6959
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

6.9600e-
003

0.3933

0.1119

1.8300e-
003

0.0569

2.9700e-
003

0.0598

0.0156

2.8400e-
003

0.0184
201.4259
201.4259

0.0114

0.0320
211.2500
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0387

0.0249

0.4247

1.2400e-
003

0.1453

7.8000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

7.2000e-
004

0.0393
124.8862
124.8862

2.8200e-
003

2.7400e-
003
125.7721
Total

0.0457

0.4182

0.5366

3.0700e-
003

0.2022

3.7500e-
003

0.2059

0.0541

3.5600e-
003

0.0577
326.3121
326.3121

0.0142

0.0348
337.0220
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 7 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 333 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

0.7031

0.0000

0.7031

0.1065

0.0000

0.1065

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.6311

0.6311

0.5895

0.5895

0.0000
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Total

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.7031

0.6311

1.3342

0.1065

0.5895

0.6959

0.0000
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

6.9600e-
003

0.3933

0.1119

1.8300e-
003

0.0569

2.9700e-
003

0.0598

0.0156

2.8400e-
003

0.0184
201.4259
201.4259

0.0114

0.0320
211.2500
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0387

0.0249

0.4247

1.2400e-
003

0.1453

7.8000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

7.2000e-
004

0.0393
124.8862
124.8862

2.8200e-
003

2.7400e-
003
125.7721
Total

0.0457

0.4182

0.5366

3.0700e-
003

0.2022

3.7500e-
003

0.2059

0.0541

3.5600e-
003

0.0577
326.3121
326.3121

0.0142

0.0348
337.0220
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 8 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 334 of 561

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

6.2662

0.0000

6.2662

3.0041

0.0000

3.0041

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

0.4823

0.4823

0.4437

0.4437
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Total

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

6.2662

0.4823

6.7485

3.0041

0.4437

3.4478
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0238

0.0153

0.2614

7.6000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

76.8531

76.8531

1.7400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

77.3982
Total

0.0238

0.0153

0.2614

7.6000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

76.8531

76.8531

1.7400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

77.3982
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 9 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 335 of 561

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

6.2662

0.0000

6.2662

3.0041

0.0000

3.0041

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

0.4823

0.4823

0.4437

0.4437

0.0000
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Total

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

6.2662

0.4823

6.7485

3.0041

0.4437

3.4478

0.0000
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0238

0.0153

0.2614

7.6000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

76.8531

76.8531

1.7400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

77.3982
Total

0.0238

0.0153

0.2614

7.6000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

76.8531

76.8531

1.7400e-
003

1.6800e-
003

77.3982
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 10 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 336 of 561

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

7.0826

0.0000

7.0826

3.4247

0.0000

3.4247

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

0.5722

0.5722

0.5265

0.5265
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Total

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

7.0826

0.5722

7.6548

3.4247

0.5265

3.9512
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.1338

7.5634

2.1521

0.0352

1.0932

0.0571

1.1503

0.2997

0.0546

0.3543
3,873.574
5 3,873.574
5 0.2193

0.6156
4,062.499
5 Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0298

0.0191

0.3267

9.5000e-
004

0.1118

6.0000e-
004

0.1124

0.0296

5.5000e-
004

0.0302

96.0663

96.0663

2.1700e-
003

2.1000e-
003

96.7477
Total

0.1636

7.5826

2.4788

0.0361

1.2050

0.0577

1.2627

0.3293

0.0552

0.3845
3,969.640
8 3,969.640
8 0.2215

0.6177
4,159.247
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 11 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 337 of 561

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

7.0826

0.0000

7.0826

3.4247

0.0000

3.4247

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

0.5722

0.5722

0.5265

0.5265

0.0000
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Total

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

7.0826

0.5722

7.6548

3.4247

0.5265

3.9512

0.0000
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.1338

7.5634

2.1521

0.0352

1.0932

0.0571

1.1503

0.2997

0.0546

0.3543
3,873.574
5 3,873.574
5 0.2193

0.6156
4,062.499
5 Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0298

0.0191

0.3267

9.5000e-
004

0.1118

6.0000e-
004

0.1124

0.0296

5.5000e-
004

0.0302

96.0663

96.0663

2.1700e-
003

2.1000e-
003

96.7477
Total

0.1636

7.5826

2.4788

0.0361

1.2050

0.0577

1.2627

0.3293

0.0552

0.3845
3,969.640
8 3,969.640
8 0.2215

0.6177
4,159.247
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 12 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 338 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Total

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.1600e-
003

0.0729

0.0281

3.6000e-
004

0.0128

4.2000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.0900e-
003

38.6422

38.6422

1.3200e-
003

5.6000e-
003

40.3446
Worker

0.0179

0.0115

0.1960

5.7000e-
004

0.0671

3.6000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.3000e-
004

0.0181

57.6398

57.6398

1.3000e-
003

1.2600e-
003

58.0486
Total

0.0200

0.0844

0.2241

9.3000e-
004

0.0799

7.8000e-
004

0.0807

0.0215

7.4000e-
004

0.0222

96.2820

96.2820

2.6200e-
003

6.8600e-
003

98.3933
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 13 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 339 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348

0.0000
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Total

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348

0.0000
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.1600e-
003

0.0729

0.0281

3.6000e-
004

0.0128

4.2000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.0900e-
003

38.6422

38.6422

1.3200e-
003

5.6000e-
003

40.3446
Worker

0.0179

0.0115

0.1960

5.7000e-
004

0.0671

3.6000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.3000e-
004

0.0181

57.6398

57.6398

1.3000e-
003

1.2600e-
003

58.0486
Total

0.0200

0.0844

0.2241

9.3000e-
004

0.0799

7.8000e-
004

0.0807

0.0215

7.4000e-
004

0.0222

96.2820

96.2820

2.6200e-
003

6.8600e-
003

98.3933
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 14 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 340 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Total

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.1100e-
003

0.0726

0.0277

3.5000e-
004

0.0128

4.3000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.0900e-
003

37.9379

37.9379

1.3200e-
003

5.5100e-
003

39.6119
Worker

0.0167

0.0103

0.1826

5.5000e-
004

0.0671

3.4000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.2000e-
004

0.0181

55.6753

55.6753

1.1800e-
003

1.1800e-
003

56.0565
Total

0.0189

0.0829

0.2103

9.0000e-
004

0.0799

7.7000e-
004

0.0806

0.0215

7.3000e-
004

0.0222

93.6131

93.6131

2.5000e-
003

6.6900e-
003

95.6684
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 15 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 341 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785

0.0000
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Total

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785

0.0000
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.1100e-
003

0.0726

0.0277

3.5000e-
004

0.0128

4.3000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.0900e-
003

37.9379

37.9379

1.3200e-
003

5.5100e-
003

39.6119
Worker

0.0167

0.0103

0.1826

5.5000e-
004

0.0671

3.4000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.2000e-
004

0.0181

55.6753

55.6753

1.1800e-
003

1.1800e-
003

56.0565
Total

0.0189

0.0829

0.2103

9.0000e-
004

0.0799

7.7000e-
004

0.0806

0.0215

7.3000e-
004

0.0222

93.6131

93.6131

2.5000e-
003

6.6900e-
003

95.6684
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 16 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 342 of 561

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.5732

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Paving

0.0210

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.5942

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0363

0.0224

0.3956

1.1900e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
120.6297
120.6297

2.5500e-
003

2.5600e-
003
121.4558
Total

0.0363

0.0224

0.3956

1.1900e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
120.6297
120.6297

2.5500e-
003

2.5600e-
003
121.4558
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 17 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 343 of 561

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.5732

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276

0.0000
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Paving

0.0210

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.5942

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276

0.0000
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0363

0.0224

0.3956

1.1900e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
120.6297
120.6297

2.5500e-
003

2.5600e-
003
121.4558
Total

0.0363

0.0224

0.3956

1.1900e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
120.6297
120.6297

2.5500e-
003

2.5600e-
003
121.4558
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 18 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 344 of 561

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating

9.2760

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total

9.4469

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.7900e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0304

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

9.2792

9.2792

2.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

9.3428
Total

2.7900e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0304

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

9.2792

9.2792

2.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

9.3428
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 19 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 345 of 561

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating

9.2760

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total

9.4469

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.7900e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0304

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

9.2792

9.2792

2.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

9.3428
Total

2.7900e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0304

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

9.2792

9.2792

2.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

9.3428
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 20 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 346 of 561

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

1.9851

1.7823

16.5811

0.0353

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,595.442
1 3,595.442
1 0.2486

0.1632
3,650.287
0 Unmitigated

1.9851

1.7823

16.5811

0.0353

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,595.442
1 3,595.442
1 0.2486

0.1632
3,650.287
0 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Racquet Club
576.63
877.49
715.14
1,303,889
1,303,889
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
576.63
877.49
715.14
1,303,889
1,303,889
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Racquet Club

16.60 8.40

6.90 11.50

69.50 19.00
52 39
9 Other Asphalt Surfaces

16.60 8.40

6.90 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 21 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 347 of 561

Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Racquet Club

0.541709

0.062136

0.185590

0.128486

0.023783

0.006533

0.012157

0.009216

0.000814

0.000497

0.024669

0.000753

0.003657
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.541709

0.062136

0.185590

0.128486

0.023783

0.006533

0.012157

0.009216

0.000814

0.000497

0.024669

0.000753

0.003657

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 22 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 348 of 561

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
487.183

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Total

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club

0.487183

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Total

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 23 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 349 of 561

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Unmitigated

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0254

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1973

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Total

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 24 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 350 of 561

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0254

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1973

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Total

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 25 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 351 of 561

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:33 AM

Page 26 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 352 of 561

1900 Riverside Stable
South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics - To demolish a 422 SF and 9,104 SF buildings (horse stables), and 536 SF and 3,224 SF operation buildings (14,286 SF total) and to construct 4,223 SF horse stable, 253 SF storage, 4,795 SF Kennel, and a 630 SF support building.

Land Use - 9,901 SF of Recreational Use (Horse stables, kennels, storage, and operational offices) and approximately 3,500 SF of asphalt surface parking lots.

Construction Phase - Demolition/site prep (1 month, 1 week), grading (1 month), construction (1 year), paving (1 month) and architectural coating (1 month).

Grading - grading will constist of 1,000 cubic yards of cut/fill (balanced grading onsite) on a 1.02 Acrea parcel.

Demolition - demolition of 4 buildings (14,286 SF total)

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Other Asphalt Surfaces

3.50 1000sqft

0.08 3,500.00
0 Racquet Club

41.10 1000sqft

0.94 9,901.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.2 31

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company
Glendale Water and Power
2025
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
948.98

0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
41,100.00
9,901.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber

0.00 250.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 1 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 353 of 561

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

1.4872

21.7632

13.9860

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9177

3.7540

0.5930

4.3358

0.0000
5,964.059
7 5,964.059
7 0.8664

0.6185
6,170.039
5 2025

9.4499

10.5003

12.6334

0.0229

0.1453

0.3933

0.4731

0.0385

0.3793

0.4007

0.0000
2,092.611
9 2,092.611
9 0.4140

6.7700e-
003
2,102.865
3 Maximum

9.4499

21.7632

13.9860

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9177

3.7540

0.5930

4.3358

0.0000
5,964.059
7 5,964.059
7 0.8664

0.6185
6,170.039
5 Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
lb/day
lb/day
2024

1.4872

21.7632

13.9860

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9177

3.7540

0.5930

4.3358

0.0000
5,964.059
7 5,964.059
7 0.8664

0.6185
6,170.039
5 2025

9.4499

10.5003

12.6334

0.0229

0.1453

0.3933

0.4731

0.0385

0.3793

0.4007

0.0000
2,092.611
9 2,092.611
9 0.4140

6.7700e-
003
2,102.865
3 Maximum

9.4499

21.7632

13.9860

0.0567

8.2876

0.6349

8.9177

3.7540

0.5930

4.3358

0.0000
5,964.059
7 5,964.059
7 0.8664

0.6185
6,170.039
5 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 2 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 354 of 561

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 3 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 355 of 561

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Energy

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Mobile

1.8908

1.9147

16.3498

0.0337

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,433.000
5 3,433.000
5 0.2590

0.1698
3,490.066
3 Total

2.1192

1.9625

16.3945

0.0339

3.7705

0.0294

3.7999

1.0048

0.0276

1.0324
3,490.326
0 3,490.326
0 0.2602

0.1708
3,547.733
0 Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Area

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Energy

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Mobile

1.8908

1.9147

16.3498

0.0337

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,433.000
5 3,433.000
5 0.2590

0.1698
3,490.066
3 Total

2.1192

1.9625

16.3945

0.0339

3.7705

0.0294

3.7999

1.0048

0.0276

1.0324
3,490.326
0 3,490.326
0 0.2602

0.1708
3,547.733
0 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 4 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 356 of 561

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
3/18/2024
4/12/2024
5 20
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
4/13/2024
4/16/2024
5 2
3 Grading
Grading
4/17/2024
4/22/2024
5 4
4 Building Construction
Building Construction
4/23/2024
1/27/2025
5 200
5 Paving
Paving
1/28/2025
2/10/2025
5 10
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/11/2025
2/24/2025
5 10
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers
1 6.00
9 0.56
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 6.00
231

0.29 Site Preparation
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,852; Non-Residential Outdoor: 4,951; Striped Parking Area: 210 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 5 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 357 of 561

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Forklifts
1 6.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
1 6.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
1 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
1 7.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00
247

0.40 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 6.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 7.00
97 0.37
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
3 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
5 13.00

0.00 65.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
3 8.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
4 10.00

0.00 250.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7 6.00

2.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
5 13.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 1.00

0.00 0.00

14.70 6.90

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 6 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 358 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

0.7031

0.0000

0.7031

0.1065

0.0000

0.1065

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.6311

0.6311

0.5895

0.5895
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Total

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.7031

0.6311

1.3342

0.1065

0.5895

0.6959
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

6.4900e-
003

0.4121

0.1135

1.8300e-
003

0.0569

2.9800e-
003

0.0598

0.0156

2.8500e-
003

0.0184
201.6552
201.6552

0.0114

0.0321
211.4897
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0410

0.0272

0.3845

1.1600e-
003

0.1453

7.8000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

7.2000e-
004

0.0393
117.6437
117.6437

2.8700e-
003

2.9000e-
003
118.5797
Total

0.0475

0.4393

0.4980

2.9900e-
003

0.2022

3.7600e-
003

0.2059

0.0541

3.5700e-
003

0.0577
319.2989
319.2989

0.0143

0.0350
330.0694
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 7 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 359 of 561

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

0.7031

0.0000

0.7031

0.1065

0.0000

0.1065

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.6311

0.6311

0.5895

0.5895

0.0000
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Total

1.4397

13.8867

13.4879

0.0241

0.7031

0.6311

1.3342

0.1065

0.5895

0.6959

0.0000
2,324.945
9 2,324.945
9 0.5884
2,339.656
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

6.4900e-
003

0.4121

0.1135

1.8300e-
003

0.0569

2.9800e-
003

0.0598

0.0156

2.8500e-
003

0.0184
201.6552
201.6552

0.0114

0.0321
211.4897
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0410

0.0272

0.3845

1.1600e-
003

0.1453

7.8000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

7.2000e-
004

0.0393
117.6437
117.6437

2.8700e-
003

2.9000e-
003
118.5797
Total

0.0475

0.4393

0.4980

2.9900e-
003

0.2022

3.7600e-
003

0.2059

0.0541

3.5700e-
003

0.0577
319.2989
319.2989

0.0143

0.0350
330.0694
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 8 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 360 of 561

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

6.2662

0.0000

6.2662

3.0041

0.0000

3.0041

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

0.4823

0.4823

0.4437

0.4437
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Total

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

6.2662

0.4823

6.7485

3.0041

0.4437

3.4478
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0252

0.0167

0.2366

7.2000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

72.3961

72.3961

1.7600e-
003

1.7800e-
003

72.9722
Total

0.0252

0.0167

0.2366

7.2000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

72.3961

72.3961

1.7600e-
003

1.7800e-
003

72.9722
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 9 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 361 of 561

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

6.2662

0.0000

6.2662

3.0041

0.0000

3.0041

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

0.4823

0.4823

0.4437

0.4437

0.0000
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Total

1.1067

11.8407

6.6317

0.0172

6.2662

0.4823

6.7485

3.0041

0.4437

3.4478

0.0000
1,665.882
6 1,665.882
6 0.5388
1,679.352
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0252

0.0167

0.2366

7.2000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

72.3961

72.3961

1.7600e-
003

1.7800e-
003

72.9722
Total

0.0252

0.0167

0.2366

7.2000e-
004

0.0894

4.8000e-
004

0.0899

0.0237

4.4000e-
004

0.0242

72.3961

72.3961

1.7600e-
003

1.7800e-
003

72.9722
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 10 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 362 of 561

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

7.0826

0.0000

7.0826

3.4247

0.0000

3.4247

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

0.5722

0.5722

0.5265

0.5265
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Total

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

7.0826

0.5722

7.6548

3.4247

0.5265

3.9512
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.1248

7.9244

2.1827

0.0352

1.0932

0.0572

1.1504

0.2997

0.0547

0.3544
3,877.984
3 3,877.984
3 0.2188

0.6163
4,067.108
8 Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0316

0.0209

0.2958

9.0000e-
004

0.1118

6.0000e-
004

0.1124

0.0296

5.5000e-
004

0.0302

90.4952

90.4952

2.2100e-
003

2.2300e-
003

91.2152
Total

0.1564

7.9454

2.4785

0.0361

1.2050

0.0578

1.2628

0.3293

0.0553

0.3846
3,968.479
5 3,968.479
5 0.2210

0.6185
4,158.324
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 11 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 363 of 561

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust

7.0826

0.0000

7.0826

3.4247

0.0000

3.4247

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

0.5722

0.5722

0.5265

0.5265

0.0000
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Total

1.3015

13.8178

8.6998

0.0206

7.0826

0.5722

7.6548

3.4247

0.5265

3.9512

0.0000
1,995.580
3 1,995.580
3 0.6454
2,011.715
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.1248

7.9244

2.1827

0.0352

1.0932

0.0572

1.1504

0.2997

0.0547

0.3544
3,877.984
3 3,877.984
3 0.2188

0.6163
4,067.108
8 Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0316

0.0209

0.2958

9.0000e-
004

0.1118

6.0000e-
004

0.1124

0.0296

5.5000e-
004

0.0302

90.4952

90.4952

2.2100e-
003

2.2300e-
003

91.2152
Total

0.1564

7.9454

2.4785

0.0361

1.2050

0.0578

1.2628

0.3293

0.0553

0.3846
3,968.479
5 3,968.479
5 0.2210

0.6185
4,158.324
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 12 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 364 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Total

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.0600e-
003

0.0766

0.0290

3.6000e-
004

0.0128

4.3000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.0900e-
003

38.7132

38.7132

1.3100e-
003

5.6200e-
003

40.4199
Worker

0.0189

0.0126

0.1775

5.4000e-
004

0.0671

3.6000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.3000e-
004

0.0181

54.2971

54.2971

1.3200e-
003

1.3400e-
003

54.7291
Total

0.0210

0.0891

0.2065

9.0000e-
004

0.0799

7.9000e-
004

0.0807

0.0215

7.4000e-
004

0.0222

93.0103

93.0103

2.6300e-
003

6.9600e-
003

95.1490
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 13 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 365 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348

0.0000
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Total

1.4200

11.0639

12.5172

0.0221

0.4506

0.4506

0.4348

0.4348

0.0000
2,001.921
4 2,001.921
4 0.3334
2,010.256
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.0600e-
003

0.0766

0.0290

3.6000e-
004

0.0128

4.3000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.0900e-
003

38.7132

38.7132

1.3100e-
003

5.6200e-
003

40.4199
Worker

0.0189

0.0126

0.1775

5.4000e-
004

0.0671

3.6000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.3000e-
004

0.0181

54.2971

54.2971

1.3200e-
003

1.3400e-
003

54.7291
Total

0.0210

0.0891

0.2065

9.0000e-
004

0.0799

7.9000e-
004

0.0807

0.0215

7.4000e-
004

0.0222

93.0103

93.0103

2.6300e-
003

6.9600e-
003

95.1490
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 14 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 366 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Total

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.0100e-
003

0.0762

0.0286

3.5000e-
004

0.0128

4.3000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
003

38.0086

38.0086

1.3200e-
003

5.5200e-
003

39.6868
Worker

0.0178

0.0113

0.1654

5.2000e-
004

0.0671

3.4000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.2000e-
004

0.0181

52.4508

52.4508

1.2000e-
003

1.2500e-
003

52.8537
Total

0.0198

0.0875

0.1940

8.7000e-
004

0.0799

7.7000e-
004

0.0806

0.0215

7.3000e-
004

0.0222

90.4595

90.4595

2.5200e-
003

6.7700e-
003

92.5405
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 15 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 367 of 561

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785

0.0000
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Total

1.3246

10.4128

12.4393

0.0221

0.3925

0.3925

0.3785

0.3785

0.0000
2,002.152
4 2,002.152
4 0.3269
2,010.324
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

2.0100e-
003

0.0762

0.0286

3.5000e-
004

0.0128

4.3000e-
004

0.0132

3.6900e-
003

4.1000e-
004

4.1000e-
003

38.0086

38.0086

1.3200e-
003

5.5200e-
003

39.6868
Worker

0.0178

0.0113

0.1654

5.2000e-
004

0.0671

3.4000e-
004

0.0674

0.0178

3.2000e-
004

0.0181

52.4508

52.4508

1.2000e-
003

1.2500e-
003

52.8537
Total

0.0198

0.0875

0.1940

8.7000e-
004

0.0799

7.7000e-
004

0.0806

0.0215

7.3000e-
004

0.0222

90.4595

90.4595

2.5200e-
003

6.7700e-
003

92.5405
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 16 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 368 of 561

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.5732

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Paving

0.0210

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.5942

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0385

0.0244

0.3584

1.1200e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
113.6435
113.6435

2.5900e-
003

2.7100e-
003
114.5163
Total

0.0385

0.0244

0.3584

1.1200e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
113.6435
113.6435

2.5900e-
003

2.7100e-
003
114.5163
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 17 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 369 of 561

3.6 Paving - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off-Road

0.5732

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276

0.0000
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Paving

0.0210

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.5942

5.3259

8.7951

0.0136

0.2465

0.2465

0.2276

0.2276

0.0000
1,297.809
6 1,297.809
6 0.4114
1,308.095
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0385

0.0244

0.3584

1.1200e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
113.6435
113.6435

2.5900e-
003

2.7100e-
003
114.5163
Total

0.0385

0.0244

0.3584

1.1200e-
003

0.1453

7.4000e-
004

0.1461

0.0385

6.8000e-
004

0.0392
113.6435
113.6435

2.5900e-
003

2.7100e-
003
114.5163
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 18 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 370 of 561

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating

9.2760

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total

9.4469

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.9600e-
003

1.8800e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

8.7418

8.7418

2.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.8089
Total

2.9600e-
003

1.8800e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

8.7418

8.7418

2.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.8089
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 19 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 371 of 561

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating

9.2760

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1709

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Total

9.4469

1.1455

1.8091

2.9700e-
003

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0515

0.0000
281.4481
281.4481

0.0154
281.8319
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

2.9600e-
003

1.8800e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

8.7418

8.7418

2.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.8089
Total

2.9600e-
003

1.8800e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0112

6.0000e-
005

0.0112

2.9600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

3.0200e-
003

8.7418

8.7418

2.0000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.8089
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 20 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 372 of 561

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

1.8908

1.9147

16.3498

0.0337

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,433.000
5 3,433.000
5 0.2590

0.1698
3,490.066
3 Unmitigated

1.8908

1.9147

16.3498

0.0337

3.7705

0.0257

3.7962

1.0048

0.0239

1.0287
3,433.000
5 3,433.000
5 0.2590

0.1698
3,490.066
3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Racquet Club
576.63
877.49
715.14
1,303,889
1,303,889
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
576.63
877.49
715.14
1,303,889
1,303,889
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Racquet Club

16.60 8.40

6.90 11.50

69.50 19.00
52 39
9 Other Asphalt Surfaces

16.60 8.40

6.90 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 21 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 373 of 561

Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Racquet Club

0.541709

0.062136

0.185590

0.128486

0.023783

0.006533

0.012157

0.009216

0.000814

0.000497

0.024669

0.000753

0.003657
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.541709

0.062136

0.185590

0.128486

0.023783

0.006533

0.012157

0.009216

0.000814

0.000497

0.024669

0.000753

0.003657

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 22 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 374 of 561

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club
487.183

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Total

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Racquet Club

0.487183

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Total

5.2500e-
003

0.0478

0.0401

2.9000e-
004

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

3.6300e-
003

57.3157

57.3157

1.1000e-
003

1.0500e-
003

57.6563
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 23 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 375 of 561

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Unmitigated

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0254

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1973

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Total

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 24 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 376 of 561

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0254

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1973

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Total

0.2231

4.0000e-
005

4.5400e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

9.7600e-
003

9.7600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

0.0104
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 25 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 377 of 561

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 3/17/2023 11:30 AM

Page 26 of 26 ends

1900 Riverside Stable - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 378 of 561

Public Comments
Appeal Case No. PAPP-002052-2023
These comments were received after the
appeal was filed and are included for
Council's consideration.

Exhibit 8
379 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 11:03 AM
To: Calvert, Bradley; Ezzati, Vista
Subject: PDR 000210-2022, Questionable Appeal of Design Review Board Approval, 1900 Riverside Drive Attachments: letter to Mr. Calvert_GlendaleCityCouncil.pdf CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Hi Mr. Calvert and Glendale Mayor and City Council Members, I am writing with respect to the appeal filed to the DRB approval of the project located at 1900 Riverside Drive
and ask that the City staff look closely at the primary reason for the appeal. The reason is not supported by facts and its validity is questionable.

Please see my attached letter with exhibits from the DRB application file.

Thank you for your consideration,
Emily Gabel-Luddy
380 of 561

381 of 561

PROJECT: K A R A P E D I A N F A M I L Y R A N C H
PROJECT NUMBER: 558.2101.08
JANUARY 20, 2023

NOT TO SCALE
ON SITE PHOT0 SURVEY

KARAPEDIAN FAMILY
RANCH1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE GLENDALE , CA 91201
DATE:

SCALE:

BUILDING #:

Caption

PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY:

Attachment 1 ADDRESS1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE CA 91201EXISTINGPROPERTY TYPE:LEGAL DESCRIPTION:APN :

STABLESTRACT # 9792 1/2 VACALLEY ON SW562-5031-00824 / 246321939-1940 1942CE REGION/ CLUSTER:BUILT:ZONING:

GROSS LOT W/0 VACATION:VACATIONAREA:39,985 SF3,190 SF (EASEMENT NEXT TOCHANNEL)43,175 SFLOT AREA AFTERVACATION:

EXIST BUILDINGAREA:FARALLOWED:536 SF + 9,104 SF + 1,422 SF + 3,224 SF = 14,286 SFNONEFAREXISTING:14,286 SF / 39,985 SF = 0.357N/A (TABLE 30.15-B)LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED:LOT COVERAGE EXISTING:14,286 SF / 39,985 SF = 0.357 X 100%= 35.7% PARKINGEXIST PARKINGPROVIDED11

KEY NOTES

LEGENDS
EXISTINGPARKINGSTALLS #
NOTE: INFORMATIONONTHIS SHEET IS FORREFERENCE ONLY . REFERTOSURVEYPREPAREDBY / SEABOARDENGINEERINGCO. SURVEY DATED: 12/15/2021 KARAPEDIAN FAMILY RANCHDESIGN REVIEW A-01900 RIVERSIDE DRIVEGLENDALE, CA 91201DATE:1/20/2023PROJECT NUMBER558.2101.03 Caption 382 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Marcia <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 4:20 PM
To: Brotman, Daniel; Kassakhian, Ardashes; Asatryan, Elen; Devine, Paula; Najarian, Ara; Design Review Board
Subject: Silver Saddle Stables
Attachments: Letter to Glendale City Council.pdf
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Glendale City Council Members,

Andrea Joel is my neighbor at 400 West Riverside Dr. Burbank, CA 91506. I support the statements in her letter, which I have attached.

I have been living next door to the stables for 22 years. My daughter took lessons there and we had many wonderful
experiences. The stables have never been in "good shape", there is nothing architecturally historic about them. Previous owners never did anything to improve or even maintain the stables.

Rats and coyotes live there now.

Rene has come to meetings with the HOA and explained his plans in detail. It will be an upgrade to the Glendale/Burbank Rancho. I was at the meeting when the Allen Ave access situation was resolved. It's my opinion he should be able to get started. This is a frivolous suit to delay the progress to provide a valued service to the neighborhood.

Who is really behind it? Developers?
There is enough building going
on around here.

383 of 561

2 Please let him begin the process of building his state of the art stables and dog daycare so we can continue to offer horseback riding to locals and the people who come here to enjoy riding in Griffith Park.

Keep the Glendale/Burbank Rancho the unique neighborhood it is and help the local businesses thrive.

Sincerely,

Marcia Lappin
400 West Riverside Dr. #6
Burbank, CA 91506
310-922-1521

384 of 561

385 of 561

386 of 561

387 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Michael Masukawa <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2023 12:19 PM
To: Brotman, Daniel; Kassakhian, Ardashes; Asatryan, Elen; Devine, Paula; Najarian, Ara; Design Review Board
Subject: Letter of Support for 1900 Riverside Dr./Silver Saddle Stables Attachments: Letter of Support, Silver Saddle Stables Renovation.pdf CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

To the Glendale City Council and Glendale Design Review Board, please see my attached letter of support for Mr. Rene Karapedian's proposed design for 1900 Riverside Dr. and our opposition to the appeal from Legal Action Network, LLC.

Thank you!
Best regards,
Michael Masukawa
‐‐
Michael Masukawa
(562) 685‐4602
388 of 561

Michael & Cherise Masukawa
400 W. Riverside Dr. Unit #5
Burbank CA 91506
September 23, 2012
To: City Glendale City Council & Glendale Design Review Board Re: Silver Saddle Stables @ 1900 Riverside Dr. Glendale, CA 91201 Dear Members of the City Council and the Glendale Design Review Board:

This is Michael & Cherise Masukawa, owners at the Tierre Verde V complex of townhouses located directly next to Silver Saddle Stables on the border of Burbank/Glendale, the only housing structure that shares a common wall with Silver Saddle Stables.

We are writing in strong support of Rene Karapedian and his proposed design for 1900 Riverside Dr./Silver Saddle Stables. We are opposed to the appeal from Legal Action Network, LLC that was submitted.

We are also involved with Tierre Verde V’s HOA and stand by the letter submitted to you from Andrea Joel, our HOA President, who speaks for our entire community, but wanted to voice our support as well. We have been waiting for a very long time for the renovation to occur at 1900 Riverside Dr. and met with Mr. Karapedian at one of our previous HOA meetings where he explained his plans and we were in unanimous support of the proposed renovations.

We read and discussed the appeal from Legal Action Network, LLC at our HOA meeting this past week, and it does not at all reflect the feelings or understanding of the situation at 1900 Riverside Dr. for the owners at Tierre Verde V. We are in support of our neighbor Mr.

Karapedian and feel that this appeal from Legal Action Network, LLC must be some kind of stalling tactic to frustrate Mr. Karapedian and his finances with this delay. Stalling this renovation can only have an ulterior motive, and likely whoever is funding Legal Action Network, LLC wants to force him to sell the property to them.

We feel it is in the best interest of the Rancho Equestrian Community and neighborhood to allow this project to continue as planned. We must let Mr. Karapedian continue with his renovations to Silver Saddle Stables and not let it lie dormant for rats and coyotes to move in.

Delaying the renovations further will negatively impact our property value and create situations unsafe for children, pets and residents in the neighborhood. Please deny this appeal and allow the renovations to contine. Thank you for your consideration.

Our Sincerest regards,
Michael & Cherise Masukawa
Owners of Unit 5 at 400 W. Riverside Dr.
389 of 561

Public Comments
Design Review Case No.

PDR-000210-2022
For DRB Consideration at the
August 10, 2023 Hearing
390 of 561

Writer’s email:[email protected]
August 10, 2023

VIA EMAIL
[email protected]
Vista Ezzati, Planning Department

CITY OF GLENDALE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
613 E. Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206
Re: Legal Action Network
1900 Riverside Drive Design Review Board Meeting August 10, 2023 PS File No.: 1005-2300
Dear Board Members,
This firm has been retained by Legal Action Network LLC (LAN), which is a network organization of community members, equestrians, business and equestrian business owners, residents, organizations, and other stakeholders that represent the urban horse communities of Los Angeles (Los Angeles Equestrian Center), Burbank, and Glendale, California. The Riverside Rancho in the City of Glendale and the Rancho Equestrian District in Burbank are part of only three urban horse communities in the United States. All three connect to Griffith Park in Los Angeles.

I am writing today to oppose the demolition permit you are considering for the new proposed project at 1900 Riverside Drive. As part of this opposition, we request that the Design Review Board take into consideration all of the comments opposing this project which were made at the March 7, 2023 City Council meeting, and consider all of the comments as part of the public record for your consideration.

Let me highlight a few of the issues for our opposition:

1. Since at least 2019, there has been significant communication with the City of Glendale providing evidence that there is a conflict between public dog facilities (kennels) and the equestrian uses in the Rancho.

2. The Health and Safety part of the CE code indicates that uses shall not result in a negative impact on neighboring uses. In this case, the dog kennel will have a negative health and safety impact on the adjacent equestrian facilities, trails and uses.

3. The claim that this property could no longer be used as a horse facility is and continues to be false. It was operating at full capacity until the new property owner ordered the horses to be vacated.

4. The City has been provided with two historical assessments, J. Snow 2018 and J DeCarli 2021, which support that the existing property deserves historic preservation. The approval by this Board of a demolition permit will not allow the community to continue to pursue historic preservation.
391 of 561

August 10, 2023
City of Glendale Design Review Board

Page 2 ends

L:\Client Files\1005\2300 - LEGAL ACTION NETWORK\CORRESPONDENCE\CE\CE.City of Glendale.001 (oppose demolition).docx At this time, our office continues to review the history of this proposed project, the health and safety impacts, and the historical preservation. As a result, we would request that the Design Review Board continue this proposed demolition permit to its next meeting to give the community additional time to provide further information and evidence to the Design Board and the City of the inappropriateness of this proposed permit and project.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.

Very truly yours,
Hunt C. Braly
cc: Clients
392 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Jean Schanberger <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 10:59 PM
To: Design Review Board
Subject: 1900 Riverside Drive - Silver Saddle Project
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Design Review Board Members,

I’m one of the Burbank/Glendale Rancho residents who spoke at the August 10 public hearing in support of the Karapetians’ 1900
Riverside Drive stable/kennel project. Thank you so much for your Board’s gracious warm reception and support of this project. The equestrian neighborhood is delighted to know it is going forward and appreciative of Glendale’s support of our equestrian community.

It was also neat to learn more about windows from your conditions discussion!

Thank you again.

Kind regards,
Jean Schanberger
Burbank, CA
393 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Julie Schad <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 3:32 PM
To: Ezzati, Vista
Subject: 1900 Riverside Dr., Glendale
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Vista Ezzati,

I’m writing to you in opposition to the proposed kennel at 1900 Riverside Dr., Glendale.

As you are by now aware, our neighborhood
is not just an equestrian neighborhood, it is a gem that has the potential, if undisturbed, to provide cultural and equestrian enrichment for future generations to admire and enjoy.  The addition of a kennel at this location might makes sense from a business/financial perspective but it would easily contribute to the destruction of our equestrian niche.  I’m referring to the permanent loss of approximately 70 horse stalls and the chaotic addition of a commercial dog boarding enterprise.

Please deny the application and help us to keep this part of our thriving community equestrian.

Thank you for your considerate attention to our
plight.

Kind regards,
Julie Schad
Griffith Park Horse Rentals
1820 Riverside Dr.

Glendale, CA
(818)840‐8401

394 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Karin Costa <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 4:08 PM
To: Ezzati, Vista
Subject: Silver Saddle Stables
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Hi, I’m sorry I’m late to email. I’m at a horse show and can’t appear in person tonight. I’m a home and horse owner in Glendale since
1977. I am in full support of this project. We are in need of horse and dog facilities in my area. Rene Karapedian is an amazing person and for someone to take this on to protect our horse community is an angel on earth.

Please approve this project. Thank you so much for reading my email.

Sent from my iPhone
395 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Laura Shamsi <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2023 12:19 AM
To: Ezzati, Vista
Subject: 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale - Design Review Board - No PDR000210-2022 CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Vista Ezzati –
I saw the sign announcing the design review meeting for 1900 Riverside Dr, Glendale Ca.

As a long time Glendale Rancho resident, equestrian, and Realtor I wanted to take a minute to express my support for this project and think it will be a great addition to the Rancho. This business will be welcomed among many of the neighbors and animals lovers alike and hope that it receives design review approval needed to move forward. The current building has been dilapidated for many years and we’d love to see their proposed project come to life.

Anyone that is willing to contribute to the uniqueness of our quaint rancho neighborhood should be embraced. Many of us bought our properties in this area because of the equestrian charm, yet much of that is disappearing.

I vote YES for this project.

Kind Regards,
Laura Shamsi
323 Allen Ave, Glendale Ca 91201
818.210.1111

To help protect you r priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this pictu re from the Internet.

Virus-free.www.avg.com

396 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Nori Walla <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 3:30 PM
To: Ezzati, Vista
Subject: Public Comment - Design Review Case No. PDR-000210-2022, 1900 Riverside Drive CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Ms. Ezzati,

I am writing to express my tremendous support for Rene Karapedian's 1900 Riverside Drive project consisting of horse stables and dog boarding.  The conceptual drawings and the plans are absolutely beautiful!.  Once completed, this project will truly be the jewel of the Rancho!

Thank you to the City of Glendale for moving this project forward.  It will serve the Rancho and indeed all of the City of Glendale, the City of Burbank, and the City of Los Angeles well.  It is a shining example of how to preserve our historical equestrian districts as we all move forward to a better future.

Sincerely,
Nori Anne Walla
Burbank Rancho Resident
397 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Sam Kirkeby <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 4:18 PM
To: Design Review Board
Subject: 8/10/23 Meeting Letter IN SUPPORT of proposed redevelopment of 1900 Riverside Dr CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Glendale Design Review Board ~

My name is Sam Kirkeby and I am a 25 year resident of the Burbank/Glendale Rancho.

I am writing to offer my strong SUPPORT of the proposed remodel and development of 1900 Riverside Dr with new stables & dog kennels. There has been so much opportunistic development in our treasured Rancho equestrian district it is wonderful and refreshing to have people actually want to develop a property IN KEEPING WITH THE EQUESTRIAN INTEGRITY of our neighborhood. I am so relived this is one project proposal that I don't have to fight!

I kept my horses at 1900 Riverside Dr for nearly 10 years when it was "Silver Spur Stables" from 1995 through 2004. It is a great old place with a wonderful history and fantastic ambiance, but in truth it is in dire need of a refurbish and a facelift! I am so grateful the new owners want to do just that!

Please say "yes" to their proposal and let's keep the Burbank/Glendale Rancho an area that supports its equestrian history!!

Thank you so much,

Sam Kirkeby
1008 W Riverside Dr
Burbank, CA 91506
398 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Sharla <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 5:30 PM
To: Design Review Board
Subject: Silver Saddle
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Please let these poor people rebuild this barn…my  gosh it’s been ridiculous the amount of money they’ve spent before even starting.
399 of 561

Public Comments
Appeal Case No. PAPP-000522-2022
For City Council Consideration at the
March 7, 2023 Hearing
400 of 561

1 Ezzati, Vista
From: Platt, Jay
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 11:08 AM
To: Ezzati, Vista
Subject: Fw: TGHS Recommendation (AMENDED) - Agenda Item 9a, Appeal of Design Review Case No.

PDR-000210-2022 (1900 Riverside Drive to be heard March 7, 2023) Attachments: 1900 Riverside - Amend.pdf

From: john.schwab‐[email protected] <john.schwab‐[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2023 5:01 PM
To: Devine, Paula <[email protected]>; Kassakhian, Ardashes <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]>; Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]> Cc: Platt, Jay <[email protected]>; Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>; Golanian, Roubik <[email protected]>; Calvert, Bradley <[email protected]> Subject: Re: TGHS Recommendation (AMENDED) ‐ Agenda Item 9a, Appeal of Design Review Case No. PDR‐000210‐2022 (1900 Riverside Drive to be heard March 7, 2023)

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Please see the amended document.

Thanks so much…..

John Schwab
‐Sims

> On Mar 4, 2023, at 4:37 PM, john.schwab‐[email protected] wrote:
>
> Dear Mayor Kassakhian & Glendale City Council Members, >
> Please see TGHS thoughts on this upcoming agenda item regarding potential development at 1900 Riverside Dr.  This is scheduled to be discussed on March 7th.
>

> Thanks for your consideration.
>
> John Schwab‐Sims
> President ‐ The Glendale Historical Society
>
> <1900 Riverside.pdf>
401 of 561

P.O. Box 4173 Glendale CA 91202
www.GlendaleHistorical.org
March 4, 2023
Re: Agenda Item 9a, re: Appeal of the Director of Community Development’s determina- tion related to Design Review Case No. PDR-000210-2022 (1900 Riverside Drive to be heard March 7, 2023)
Dear Mayor Kassakhian and Members of the Glendale City Council:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above agenda item.

The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS) strongly supports the recommendation of Com- munity Development Staff to require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess the proposed project at 1900 Riverside Drive.

TGHS agrees with the fact based conclusion made in the historic resource assessment prepared by Jenna Snow. Her finding was that 1900 Riverside Drive would qualify as a historic resource under Criterion A, Criterion B, and City of Glendale Criterion 5.

TGHS respectfully requests that you vote to require an EIR be prepared to assess envi- ronmental impacts for potential development at 1900 Riverside Drive.

The Glendale Historical Society (TGHS) advocates for the preservation of important Glendale landmarks, supports maintaining the historic character of Glendale’s neighborhoods, educates the public about and engages the community in celebrating and preserving Glendale’s history and architectural heritage, and operates the Doctors House Museum. TGHS is a tax-exempt, not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization, and do- nations to TGHS are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law. 402 of 561

Sincerely,
John Schwab-Sims
President
The Glendale Historical Society
cc: Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Jay Platt, Senior Urban Designer
403 of 561

P.O. Box 655
Sierr a Madre, CA 91025
www.sapphosenvir onmental.com
430 North Halstead Street
May
8, 2018
Job Number: 2268-001
Historical Resource Evaluation for
1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 91204

FINAL M

EMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

2.6 2268-001.M01
TO: Gle
ndale/Riverside LLC
Attn: Art Simonian
501 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

Glendale, CA 91202
(818) 246-0092
[email protected]
FROM: S
apphos Environmental, Inc.
(Mr. Don Faxon and Ms. Carrie Chasteen)
SUBJEC
T: Historical Resource Evaluation of Property at 1900
Riverside Dr., Glendale, California
ATTA
CHMENT: 1. Resumes of Key Personnel
Exhibit 9
404 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Glendale Riverside LLC, a prospective applicant, proposes to demolish all existing buildings on the property located at 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, Los Angeles County in order to redevelop the site. At the request of the City of Glendale (City) and Glendale Riverside LLC , Sapphos Environmental, Inc. conducte d a preliminary evaluation of 1900 Riverside Dr ive, Glendale, California (AIN 5625 -031-008), to determine if the subject property meets the definition of a “historical resource” as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. In order to inform this evaluation, a site visit was c onducted on February 5, 2018, by Sapphos Environmental, Inc. ( Ms. Carrie Chasteen) . Ms. Chasteen meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in the fields of History and Architectural History.

Research was conducted in the Lo s Angeles County Assessor records, City public library and building permits, and the internet. The purpose of this research was to determine if the property meets the criteria for being determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic al Resources (CRHR), as articulated in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines , and/or for designation as a City Historic Resource. The property was not evaluated for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places per the City’s guidance. The prop erty does not possess sufficient architectural significance to merit listing in the CRHR or City Register of Historic Resources. Because the property at 1900 Riverside Drive does not appear to be eligible for listing in the CRHR and City Register of Histor ic Resources, it is not considered to be a “historical resource” as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, demolition of the buildings located on this site would not result in a substantial adverse change to a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines.

405 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 3

INTRODUCTION

Glendale Riverside LLC, a prospective applicant, proposes to demolish all existing buildings on the property located at 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, Los Angeles County in order to redevelop the site. At the request of the City of Glendale (City) and Glendale Riverside LLC , , Sapphos Environmental, Inc. conducted a preliminary evaluation of 1900 Riverside Dr ive, Glendale, California (AIN 5625-031-008), to determine if the subject property meets the definition of a “historical resource” as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This memorandum for the record (MFR) documents these identification and evaluation efforts.

In order to inform this evaluation, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. conducted a site visit on February 5, 201 8 (Ms. Carrie Chasteen ), and performed an evaluation of the subject property ( Mr. Don Faxon). Mr. Faxon and Ms. Chasteen meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in the fields of History and Architectural History (Attachment 1, Resumes of Key Personnel).

The subject property, which consists of a complex of horse stables and related service and outbuildings generally more than 50 years old, is located within a special zoning area of the City of Glendale that is identified as a CE (Commercial, Equestrian Services) Zone. The City defines this area as “designed to encourage and support the development of equestrian related activities and other related uses required or desired by the inhabitants of the community.” The City’s CE Zone includes three blocks of properties along Riverside Drive that receive special consideration, as does the “Horse Overlay Zone” for the neighborhood , including the subjec t property. It is a part of a larger “rural” equestrian related resource area within, and identified by the neighboring City of Los Angeles as, the Rancho Equestrian District (District). The District includes all equestrian- related infrastructure along the Los Angeles River that serves the trails of Griffith Park and its environs, and is centered on a core area consisting of the Equestrian Center. The City of Burbank also provides for special equestrian zoning for its related Rancho Equestrian Riverside neighborhood.

Research was conducted using reliable information available through public and nongovernmental agencies, libraries, and other sources of published information, including:

• Los Angeles County Assessor
• City of Glendale Building and Safety, building permits • City of Glendale Public Library, city directories and Sanborn maps • Historical issues of the Los Angeles Times
• Internet

The purpose of this research was to determine if the property meets the criteria for being determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), as articulated in Section 15064.5(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines:

A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history and cultural heritage;
B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value; or
D. Has yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. 406 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 4 The property was also evaluated for designation as a City Historic Resource. The eligibility criteria for the City Register of Historic Resources mirror the CRHR with the addition of resources that exemplify the early heritage of the City (Criterion E). Research was conducted to determine if the subject property exemplifies the early heritage of the City for designation as a City Historic Resource. The property was not evaluated for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places per the City’s guidance.

HISTORY

The westernmost area of the City of Glendale is the product of a number of events and annexations involving Rancho San Rafael, Rancho Providencia, the City of Burbank, and the City of Los Angeles’ development of Griffith Park. Evaluation of the subject property therefore involves the history of those areas. The following contexts focus on the histories and neighborhoods of those areas that are directly related to the property’s development and significance.

Glendale’s Northwest Annexation Area

What is today referred to as “The Rancho Equestrian District ” was part of Rancho Providencia, a Mexican land grant awarded after Mexico won independence from Spain in 1821. On this land, sheep and cattle grazed, and wheat and barley were grown from the soil. After the Spanish period ended with the signing of the Treaty of Cahuenga, local dentist David Burbank purchased a 9,000 - acre ranch in 1867, including the Rancho Providencia area. In 1866, a severe drought convinced Burbank to sell his land to the Providencia Land, Water , and Development Company, and took on the role as one of the company ’s directors. A business district was laid out, surr ounded by residential lots. Rancho Providencia was then subdivided into 10- to 40-acre farms. When Burbank was incorporated, some of that agricultural territory was annexed to the City.1 Maps showing the City’s growth suggest this mixed Burbank/Ranch San Rafael/Rancho Providencia annexation occurred just before 1930. The City states that more than 12,000 acres were annexed during this period; the majority of that acreage contributed to the large northwestern area added at that time.

Origins of the Rancho Equestrian District and Its Connection to Glendale

The history of equestrian activities and related infrastructure along the Los Angeles River between Glendale, Burbank, and Los Angeles appears to be directly related to the establishment of Griffith Park and its related horse trails in 1896. Equestrian services within the Riverside neighborhood s of Glendale and Burbank flourished to support the park’s bridle trails by the 1920s , as improvement and a national outdoor camp movement encouraged increased use of the park . Equestrian services became even more in demand as the growth nearby of film studios provided more customers during the same period. N otables such as rider Bettie Davis, whose Riverbottom estate was constructed within the Rancho Riverside neighborhood less than one -half mile from the subject property, could often be seen on horseback during leisure hours in promotional films of the period.

The area’s equestrian activities, initiated at Rancho Providencia in the 19th century, were maintained into the 1920s by the small ranches and farms carved out from the original rancho property along the river, many of which have subsequently been redeveloped. Equestrian facilities provided recreation to the public and also horses for the burgeoning film industry. Land from the development company was used to create Lasky Ranch, a film location use d for some of the Civil

1 KCET. n.d. Environment. Country Life in the Big City. Available at: https://www.kcet.org/earth-focus/country-life-in- the-big-city
407 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 5 War battle scenes of troops on horseback for the 1915 D.W. Griffith film, Birth of a Nation, as well as other famous silent film sets requiring equestrian services.2

The s mall local riding facilities were joined by large commercial stables within the Riverside junction of Glendale , Burbank, and Los Angeles , where shared equestrian interests became grouped. Many of t hese larger facilities were intended spe cifically for the film industry , such as Lasky Ranch, which included stables and a large horse track . According to a history of Los Angeles’s Forest Lawn Cemetery:3

“Warner Brothers leased the 1,000 -acre old Lasky Ranch in 1929 from W.I. Hollingswor th and Company, and by 1930 Lasky Ran ch had been in almost constant demand by studios for nearly 20 years … films made at the Lasky Ranch include All Quiet on the Western Front … and several of Charlie Chaplin’s early comedies.”

The Hudkin Brothers leased the old Lasky Ranch property around 1929 . The four Hudkin brothers continued providing equestrian services to the studios, including providing trained and untrained horses directly to the Warner Brothers lot for its western and period films . It was the Hudkin Brothers’ stable that provided f uture equine celebrity Trigger to Western film star Roy Rogers. 4 Research did not indicate any films were shot at the subject property, and the subject property is too small to host filming large production films.

As demand for horses in the greater Riverside neighborhood grew to serve the film industry and its employees, a constant and simultaneous demand for horses to serve the bridle trails of Griffith Park was taking place, during that Los Angeles park’s period of development (1896–1958).5 In Glendale, this development appears to have served as a continuation of the horse culture from the 19th century. Despite the railroads, streetcars, and automobiles that were moving through Glendale, a small equestrian community had held on where small farms still existed, and as late as 1918, hitching posts where horses could be tethered were still evident in the City. Among the first of the smaller stables to soon reappear in Glendale to serve the Griffith Park trails was the California Riding Academy at 1831 Rive rside Drive near the su bject property , which opened sometime around 1920.

During the height of the historic period of use of the subject property, 1940 to 19 58, more than 12 stables were operated at various times within the Glendale side of the Riverside Rancho Equestrian District and Rancho neighborhood serving the trails of Griffith Park. These included:

• The California Riding Academy, 1851 Riverside Drive (c. 1920–?) • The General Riding Academy, Irving Avenue (1933–1944) • The Glendale Riding Academy, Irving Avenue (1933–1950) • The Kemsley Western Riding Academy, Verdugo Road (1933–1939)

2 “The Three Stooges, Birth of a Nation, Forest Lawn Trees.” 17 April 2015. Chaplin-Keaton-Lloyd film locations (and more). Available at: https://silentlocations.wordpress.com/2015/04/17/the-three-stooges-birth-of-a-nation-forest-lawn- trees/
3 Forest Lawn Memorial-park Association Corporate Counsel, Glendale, CA. June 2009. Historical Resources Assessment, Forest Lawn Memorial Park, Hollywood Hills. Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc., Riverside, CA. p. 12. 4 Mitchum, Petrine Day, and Audrey Pavia. 2014. Hollywood Hoofbeats: The Fascinating Story of Horses in Movies and Television. Los Angeles, CA: I5 Publishing.
5 Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission. 19 April 2008. Historic-Cultural Monument Application for Griffith Park. Prepared by: ICF Jones and Stokes, Los Angeles, CA. 408 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 6 • The Royal Riding Academy 155 Irving Street (1933–?)
• The Charles Kemsley Riding Academy, 1900 Riverside Drive (1940–1947) • The Olmstead Brothers Riding School, 1850 Riverside Drive (1948–1954) • The Onondarka Riding Stables, address unknown (1947–1952) • The Parkview Riding Academy, 4865 Colorado Street (1946–1955) • The Sandy Sanders Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive (1950–1954 • The LC Goss Stables, 1850 Riverside Drive (1955–1960) • The Silver Glen Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive (1950–1954)

In addition to these riding facilities, a number of riding instructors offered services locally under their own names, including Fred O. Bailes , W. Blessing, Jack House, and Earl Ludlow. Of these 12 stables, 3 are extant. All three remaining stables appear to have been altered over the course of time as needs and trends have changed. The three remaining stables do not appear to constitute a historic district due to loss of integrity.

A recent survey of Griffith Park stated that “for almost all of Griffith Park’s long history and as of now, picnicking, horseback riding, and hiking have been key to experiencing the p ark as intended.”6 Today, the core of the District is the Los Angeles Equestrian Center, b ut the smaller private stables within Glendale’s three blocks identified as a CE Zone continue to provide livery, riding instruction, and riding tours to Griffith Park.

PROPERTY HISTORY

1900 Riverside Drive

The subject property located at 1900 Riverside Drive was constructed primarily during 1939 to 1940 according to current Assessor’s records, but aerials and permits suggest that the primary, central stables were built in 1939, with the residence and hay building added in 1942. Occupants first appeared in City directories in 1942. Businesses located at 1900 Riverside Drive during its first decade included Charles Kemsley’s and Earl Ludlow’s riding schools , the Silver Glen Stables , and Mom’s Hot Dog Stand. From 1967 to the present, the pr incipal business at the facility has been known as the Silver Spur Stables and Riding Club (Figure 1, Building Footprint s at 1900 Riverside Drive, circa 1949, Sanborn Map).

6 Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission. 19 April 2008. Historic-Cultural Monument Application for Griffith Park. Page 41. Prepared by: ICF Jones and Stokes.
409 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 7

Figure 1. Building Footprints at 1900 Riverside Drive, circa 1949, Sanborn Map SOURCE: Sanborn Maps, Glendale, 1919–1925, updated 19497

PERMIT HISTORY

Building permits show that the first significant development on the property was applied for by owner Charles Kemsley in April 1939. Those permits are for construction of the primary “center” stables, 24 feet by 57 feet in dimension, employing a concrete pad, wood framing, “wood or metal” siding, and metal roofing. 8 These were balanced by a second, slightly smaller “stable” on the property running parallel to the larger structure that were constructed in 1942 .9 These smaller stables are shown as proposed for siting far against the west property line on the building permit. It seems more likely that these are the “secondary stables” that were actually constructed much closer and next to the larger central stables, since that is where the y are shown on the 1949 Sanborn Map10 (Figure 1).

Upon completion of the two stables, Kemsley next applied for construction of “living quarters” at the front of the lot in January 1942.11

Permits for what appear to be the final stables were applied for by owner Sandy Sanders in 1957 and describe what are clearly the long outer stall units installed to the “front and side” (northeast and southeast) of the lot. 12 No permits were found for what is known as the h ay barn, now known as the petting zoo, or for the “grooming area.”

7 Sanborn Maps, Glendale June 1919, Sheet 43; Sanborn Maps, Glendale 1925 vol. 1, Sheet 129. 8 City of Glendale Building Permit No. 13799, 20 April 1939. 9 City of Glendale Building Permit No. 19942, 29 January 1942. 10 City of Glendale Building Permit No. 13798, 20 April 1939. 11 City of Glendale Building Permit 28 January 1942. No. 19942. 12 City of Glendale Building Permit 14 April 1957 No. 54301. 410 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 8

PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND OCCUPANCY

The current owner of the subject property is Bell Diversified Development, Inc . The property has had multiple owners and occupants between 19 25 and 1977. The following table summarizes the history of previous occupants and owners of this property (Table 1, Summary of Ownership History, 1900 Riverside Drive).

TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF OWNERSHIP HISTORY, 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE

Date
Occupant Identified in Glendale City
Directories13
Los Angeles County Assessor
Ownership Record
1925 N/A
John and Harry M. Lutge
1926 N/A
1927 N/A
1928 N/A
1929 N/A
1930 N/A
1931 N/A
1932 N/A
1933 N/A
1934 N/A
1935 N/A
1936 N/A
1937 N/A
1938 N/A
Charles Kemsley
1939 N/A
1940* N/A
1941 N/A
1942 Charles Kemsley Riding Academy
1943 Charles Kemsley Riding Academy
1944 Charles Kemsley Riding Academy
1945 Charles Kemsley and Earl Ludlow
1946 Charles Kemsley and Earl Ludlow
1947 Charles Kemsley and Earl Ludlow
1948 Earl R. Ludlow Riding Academy
1949 Earl R. Ludlow Riding Academy
Laura Kemsley
1950 Silver Glen Stables; Mom’s Hot Dog Stand
1951 Silver Glen Stables; Mom’s Hot Dog Stand
1952 Silver Glen Stables
1953 Silver Glen Stables
1954 Silver Glen Stables
1955 Sandy Sanders Stables
Grover S. Sanders 1956 Sandy Sanders Stables
1957 Sandy Sanders Stables
1958 N/A
1959 N/A
N/A 1963 N/A
1965 N/A
1967 Silver Spur Stables

13 Glendale City Directory Company, Glendale (1922–1977); Polk’s Glendale City Directory, Glendale (1951–1977). 411 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 9 TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF OWNERSHIP HISTORY, 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE

Date
Occupant Identified in Glendale City
Directories13
Los Angeles County Assessor
Ownership Record
1968 Silver Spur Stables
1969 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski
1970 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski
1972 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski
1973 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski
1975 N/A Roger and Alma Dyrness
1977 Zack Porteous N/A
1986 N/A Alexander Haagen III 1995 N/A
1999 N/A Empire II LLC
2003 N/A Jose M. Marroquin
2005 N/A Nicole I. Marroquin
2007 N/A James B. Sands
2007 N/A Bell Diversified Development
KEY: *Denotes date property was first improved.

ASSOCIATED PERSONS

The subject property was improved in 19 39–1940; before this date , John and Harry M. Lutge owned the unimproved parcel and much of the entire tract. The first owner to improve the property was Charles Kemsley, who had started the Kemsley Western Riding Academy on Verdugo Road before purchasing 190 0 Riverside Drive and opening the Charles Kemsley Riding Academy.

Kemsley was originally from Idaho and lived in Santa Monica before moving to Pasadena around 1930. At that time he was the “proprietor” of a riding school, possibly his Western Riding Academy.14 Charles Kemsley and his wife lived on Langdale Avenue in Eagle Rock in 1938 just before purchasing 1900 Riverside Drive and continued living there during the initial campaigns of construction for the subject property. Although Mrs. Kem sley continued to reside at the property, Charles moved to an unknown address and died in 1959 in Los Angeles. The next owner of the property was Charles Kemsley’s wife, Laura Kemsley. She was born in 1872 and was listed as living without Charles at the property from 1948 to 195415 Nine years older than Charles, she died in 1957.

The next owner of the property was a former laborer who began working with Charles Kemsley at 1900 Riverside Drive in 1940 after marrying Kemsley’s daughter, Edna. Earl R. Ludlow is described as having maintained the stables before becoming listed in 1945 as joint partner at the Charles Kemsley Riding Academy. By 1948 the a cademy was named after Ludlow, but the property was still owned by Kemsley’s wife . By 1950 the facility was referred to as the Silver Glen Stables and managed by Ludlow. In the 1940s, Ludlow won numerous horse competitions, including first place in the San Fernando V alley riding competition under the Silver Glen Stables banner.16 No information is available on Grover S. Sanders, who does not appear in any U.S. Census.

14 U.S. Census 1930
15 1948, 1951, 1954 Glendale City Directory
16 Valley Times. 2 December 1948.
412 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 10

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Complex

The property at 1900 Riverside Drive consists of a single -family residence along with a complex of horse stables and associated support buildings. Most buildings are sited so that they run from front (Riverside Drive) to rear (the Los Angeles River) of the parcel. A small, original hay barn to the rear is among the only buildings to run perpendicular to this arrangement. To the northwest, the site contains a corral referred to as “the arena.”

The principal buildings are the oldest from the facility’s original 1939–1940 construction: the long, linear, centrally located primary stables that form the backbone of the complex, and the associated caretaker’s residence . Both are visible on a 1949 Sanborn map (Figure 1), and have not significantly changed, although the stables have become partially obscured by later structures added along its southeastern (Allen Avenue extension) side , and partially along its back, western, corner. Aerial images show that these additional buildings and structures were added more than 50 years ago, before 1964 ; most were added within the same decade as the primary stables and residence (Figure 2, Current Building Footprint, Showing Relationship to Griffith Park).

Figure 2. Current Building Footprint, showing relationship to Griffith Park SOURCE: Los Angeles County Assessor, 2018

413 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 11 1939–1942 Building Campaign – Residence

A side-gabled-on-hipped one-story dwelling appears to have been constructed in 1939 –1940, and is located ne ar the front of the complex between the arena and primary stables. The vernacular building reflects a variety of architectural style influences including Ranch and Italiana te (cupula).

The building has a generally rectangular footprint and measures approximately 1,038 square feet.

The exterior walls are clad in board and batten siding. A shed roof extension shields a raised porch at the entrance to the southeast, and one bay projects slightly from a central portion of that side.

The partially enclosed porch appears to be an alteration. A pyramidal-roofed cupola projects from the primary roof near the corral side of the building. The building retains its multilight wood windows (Figure 3, General View from the East, Residence at 1900 Riverside Drive).

Figure 3. General View from the East, Residence at 1900 Riverside Drive SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 2018

Primary (Northeastern) Façade

The primary façade features a single multilight wood window, and large exaggerated eaves with exposed rafter tails (Figure 4, Primary [Northeastern] Façade, Residence, 1900 Riverside Drive).

Figure 4. Primary (Northeastern) Façade, Residence, 1900 Riverside Drive SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc. 2018
414 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 12 Southeastern Façade

The southeastern façade is defined by its shed-roof-covered primary entrance and projecting bay.

The partially enclosed porch with plywood and modern lattice skirting appears to be an addition (Figure 5, Southeastern Façade Detail, 1900 Riverside Drive).

Figure 5. Southeastern Façade Detail, 1900 Riverside Drive SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

Northwestern Façade

The northwestern façade features three evenly spaced windows topped by the cupola (Figure 6, Northwestern Façade, 1900 Riverside Drive).

Figure 6. Northwestern Façade, 1900 Riverside Drive
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018
415 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 13 1939–1942 Building Campaign – Primary Central Stables and Office

The original central stables building is a long linear end-gable roofed wood-framed building clad in board and batten siding and topped with standing seam metal roofing . A raised gabled clerestory element provides light along most of the roof. The fenestration on the primary façade of the building appears to include a mix of both replacement window sash and possibly original sash within original openings. The metal roofing has been replaced over the course of time due to wear and tear. Additionally, two bubble skylights were installed at an unknown date . An office occupies the front of this building and is visible from the north (Figure 7 , Primary [Northeastern] Façade, Original Central Stables; Figure 8 , Northwestern Façade, O riginal Central Stables Showing Office Area).

Figure 7. Primary (Northeastern) Façade, Original Central Stables SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

Figure 8. Northwestern Façade, Original Central Stables Showing Office Area SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

416 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 14 The southwestern (trail) end of the original stables has been substantially reconstructed and/or extended. It is clad in modern vertical wood siding , and only its massing and roof slope are common with the primary street end of the building . The building was clad in corrugated metal siding and was reclad in wood siding within the last 10 years (Figure 9 , Southwestern Façade, Original Central Stables).

Figure 9. Southwestern Façade, Original Central Stables SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

1939–1942 Building Campaign – Northwest (Secondary) Stables

Constructed along with the primary stables during 1939 –1940, the secondary stables are smaller than the primary stables and located parallel to, and just northwest of, those central stables; they are south of the dwelling at 1900 Riverside Drive. They are semi-open with a raised central gabled roof flanked by outer shed-roofed stall wings. The building was clad in corrugated metal siding and was reclad in wood siding within the last 10 years (Figure 10, South View of Secondary Stables).

Figure 10. South View of Secondary Stables
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018
417 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 15 Circa 1947 – Grooming Area

The grooming area seems to have been constructed by 194 7, and consists of a covered, open area with adjacent storage areas for brushes, blankets, and other related paraphernalia (Figure 11 , Grooming Area).

Figure 11. Grooming Area
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

Circa 1947/1990 – Hay Barn

The hay barn is a gabled, wood -framed, semiopen building employing modern vertical board siding. The barn has been substantially altered by an addition from an undetermined date of construction. The addition obscures the original, board and batten, 1940s primar y façade (Figure 12, Southeastern Façade, O riginal Hay Barn Showing Modern Front Addition ; Figure 13, Original Primary Façade of Hay Barn Seen inside Current Building).

418 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 16

Figure 12. Southeastern Façade, Original Hay Barn Showing Modern Front Addition SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

Figure 13. Original Primary Façade of Hay Barn Seen inside Current Building SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

419 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 17 1957 – Southeast Stables

This long (112-foot), gable-roofed stables building was added in 1957 along the outer perimeter of the property to the southeast, along Allen Avenue extension . The building was constructed using concrete blocks, modern wood, and metal animal corrals (Figure 14, Southeast Stables).

Figure 14, Southeast Stables
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2018

EVALUATION

The subject property at 1900 Riverside Drive is an equestrian-related complex within a special use zone for that purpose in the City of Glendale. The property is associated with the growth of equestrian-related recreational activities shared by Los Angeles, Burbank, and Glendale within their shared and tightly defined use area known as known the Rancho Equestrian District. Since at least the 1920s , riding facilities replaced working farms . The r eplacement equestrian barns, stables, riding arenas, and bridle trails that were constructed as early as the 1920s contribute to the zoned area’s feel. The history of riding stables in this area of Glendale coincides with the later years of the primary period of significance for Griffith Park (1898 to 1958) ,17 and also with the growth of the nearby film industry, if more indirectly. This defined zone shares traits of development, use, and history, and conveys the historic relationship with the horse that was closely associated with Glendale, since areas of that city have maintained a n uninterrupted relationship with the horse since the 19th century that became associated with Griffith Park ’s miles of bridle trails . However, the City of Los Angeles Historic -Cultural Monument application did not identify equestrian activities as significant in the history of the park.18

The subject property at 1900 Riverside Drive was created in 1940 as a part of this equestrian development. It is a component of a minimal, three-block area associated with equestrian activities that has become somewhat disconnected from other early horse-culture resources due to Burbank’s redevelopment of its equestrian zone, and the City of Los Angeles’s 1980 redevelopment of Griffith

17 Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission. 19 April 2008. Historic-Cultural Monument Application for Griffith Park. Page 41. Prepared by: ICF Jones and Stokes.
18 Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission. 19 April 2008. Historic-Cultural Monument Application for Griffith Park. Page 41. Prepared by: ICF Jones and Stokes.
420 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 18 Park’s Equestrian Center. The architecture of the subject property reflects a working addition to the historic origins of this development rather than a formative or high- style contribution, and its use has deteriorated its level of integrity. It therefore cannot convey the significant broad patterns of history and cultural heritage in this regional trend to develop and maintain an equestrian-related recreational infrastructure, and so is ineligible pursuant to Criterion A.

Although many early riders and instructors of minor local prominence passed though the subject property, their relationships to it is not substantial or long term enough to be associated with this property pursuant to Criterion B.

The primary two buildings of the complex— the original stables and residence —were constructed during a period when it was not unusual to provide a Mid -Century “theme” influence of revival architectural style for a service -related commercial/recreational building. The house at the subje ct property in fact suggests the kind of theme/period style/type shared by the nearby Griffith Park and Southern Pacific Miniature Railroad complex “depot” for instance, as well as aspects of some shared period theme park architecture. A long with the prima ry stables it creates an evocative, if limited, “Old West” feeling that would be consistent with kinds of 1940s and 1950s customers that arrived seeking a small taste of the experience they watched on television Westerns each night.

Nevertheless, the buildings represent a vernacular use of architectural elements from slightly different periods and style , and are not of high architectural merit. They therefore are do not embody the distinct characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction pursuan t to Criterion C, and have no association with a known master architect.

The buildings were constructed using common building materials and techniques, and the site was graded during construction of the buildings. Therefore, the property is not likely to yield significant information regarding the prehistory and history of the area pursuant to Criterion D. Additionally, while related to the history of equestrian activities in the City and Griffith Park, the property does not exemplify the ea rly heritage of the City pursuant to Criterion E because it was established at least 33 years after the establishment of Glendale and almost 20 years after equestrian activities were established in this area of the City.

Integrity Considerations

The set ting of the property has been compromised because it is now adjacent to modern multistory, multifamily apartment buildings to the east across the boundary with Burbank. The property located at 1900 Riverside Drive is altered with some window and entrance alterations and new cladding materials to its original stables and barns. Additionally, the primary entry porch of the residence has been altered , and the property does not retain integrity of design, workmanship , or materials. Moreover, buildings adjacent to the property in neighboring Burbank have largely changed from those evident at the time of construct ion and become large apartment complexes or commercial buildings . The building s have not been moved and retain integrity of location. The property located at 1900 Riverside Drive does not possess sufficient historical or architectural significance to merit listing in the CRHR or City Register of Historic Resources.

421 of 561

Historical Resource Evaluation of 1900 Riverside Drive Memorandum for the Record May 8, 2018 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
\\zeus\wp\Projects\2268\2268-001\MFR\2268-001 MFR1_rev20180508.docx Page 19

CONCLUSION

Because the property at 1900 Riverside Drive does not appear to be eligible for listing in the CRHR and City Register of Historic Resources, it is not considered to be a “historical resource” as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, demolition of the buildings located on this site would not result in a substantial adverse change to a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Should there be any questions regarding the information contained in this MFR, please contact Ms. Carrie Chasteen at (626) 683-3547, extension 102.

422 of 561

ATTACHMENT 1

RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL

423 of 561

Carrie E. Chasteen, MS, BA
S
enior Historic Resource
Specialist
MS,
Historic Preservation,
School of the Art Institute of
Chicago, Chicago, IL
B
A, History and Political
Science, University of South
Florida, Tampa, FL
Phi
Alpha Theta historical honor
society
• C
ultural resources
management and legal
compliance
• History of California
• Identification and
e
valuation of the built
environment
• Historic American
B
uilding Survey (HABS)
and Engineering Record
(
HAER) documentation
• Historic Property Survey
Reports (HPSRs)
• Historical Resources
Evaluation Reports
(HRERs)
Ye
ars of Experience: 15+
R
elevant Experience
• C
ertified Oregon
Tr
ansportation Investment
Act (OTIA) III CS3
Technical Lead
• Historic Preservati
on
C
ommissioner, City of
Pasadena, CA
• Historic consultant for the
Shangri La Hotel
renovation project, Santa
Monica, CA
• Principal Architectural
Historian for the Interstate
10 (I-10) Corridor Project
• HABS/HAE
R
doc
umentation for
Mission Control at NASA
JPL in Pasadena, CA
Ms. Carrie Chasteen has more than 15 years of experience in the field of cultural re sources management and the built environment, including project management, agency coordination, archival research, managing large surveys, preparation of Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) sections, peer review, and regulatory compliance. She me ets and exceeds the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in the fields of History and Architectural History.

Ms. Chasteen has served as Principal Investigator / Principal Architectural Historian on projects in Kern, S an Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Imperial, and San Diego Counties in
Southern California. She has extensive experie nce with the California Office of Historic Preservation, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), S an Be rnardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), Los Angeles County Department of Parks and
Recreation, the City of L os Angeles, and various other State, county, and local government agencies.

Ms. Chasteen served as the historic consultant for the design team for the renovation of the Shangri La Hotel, Santa Monica, California, which won a historic preservation award from the Santa Monica Conservancy.

For the Shangri La Hotel project, Ms. Chasteen documented and ranked the character -defining features of the building and structures on the property; reviewed plans for consistenc y with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; assisted with developing creative solutions to meet the objectives of updating the hotel amenities while maintaining the historic character of the building; assisted with the entitlement process including presentations before the Planning Commission; and prepared Historic American Building Surv ey (HABS) documentation of the linoleum flooring which was set in unique patterns per room throughout the entire building. Additional experience includes serving as Principal Architectural Historian for the Interstate 10 (I-10) Corridor Project. For this project, Ms. Chasteen prepared a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), and a Finding of No Adverse Effect with Non -Standard Conditions (FNAE). As part of the FNAE, she conducted agency consultation with the Cities of Redlands, Upland, and Ontario, and with other interested parties including regional historical societies. Ms.

Chasteen has also prepared Historic American Buildings Survey / Historic American Engineering Record (HABS / HAER) documentation for the former Caltrans District 7 headquarters building and the Space Flight Operations Facility, commonly referred to a s Mission Control, a National Historic Monument, at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena.

Ms. Chasteen is a member of the Society of Architectural Historians, National Trust for Historic Preservation, California Preservation Foundation, and Pasadena Heritage. Ms. Chasteen is also a Historic Preservation Commissioner for the City of Pasadena.
424 of 561

Donald M. Faxon, MA, BS

Architectural Historian
Preservation Specialist

MA, Historic Preservation,
Savannah College of Art &
Design, Savannah, GA

BS, Public Communications,
Boston University, Boston,
MA

• Cultural resources
management and legal
compliance
• History of California
• Identification and
evaluation of the built
environment
• Archival documentation
• Historic preservation
consultation
• Historic treatment
planning, monitoring, and
management.
• ADA assessment
• Historic structure reports
and conditions
assessment
• Scientific materials
evaluation
• Architectural history

Years of Experience: 25 +

• Society of Architectural
Historians
• Former Cultural Heritage
Commissioner, City of
Sierra Madre
• Sigma Pi Kappa Historic
Preservation Fellowship
• Former Historical
Architect at a State
Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO)
• Section 106 reports

Donald M. Faxon has professional experience as both an Architectural Historian and Architectural Preservation Specialist. He served as Senior Historical Architect at a state office of historic preservation (S HPO) and as a city Cultural Heritage Commissioner; and has worked for the National Park Service and the National Trust for Historic Preservation. He has explained, interpreted, applied, and/or enforced the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards in positions on both c oasts. His experience includes providing inventory, significance evaluations, re -use stud ies, and interpretation options. He also provides architectural technical expertise in design review, visual and scientific condition assessments, preservation and conser vation treatments, historic structure reports, project monitoring, compatible integration design for code required elements, and accessibility planning for the disabled. Additional skills include architectural project planning and monitoring. He has prepar ed technical reports for historical built environment resources to satisfy compliance requirements under CEQA, Section 106, and local ordinances.

Mr. Faxon has more than 25 years of experience as a historic preservation professional on projects involvin g a wide variety of building, structure and landscape styles and types, including agricultural, maritime, industrial, residential, commercial, transportation, civic, religious, entertainment, and military related resources.

Mr. Faxon’s selected project experience includes:

• Secretary of the Interior’s Standards Conformance Review for Los Angeles Unified School District’s Lincoln High School HVAC Project.
• Evaluation and recommendations for properties owned by the Preservation Society of Newport County (The Newport Mansions) for Americans with the Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility, Newport, RI.
• Secretary of the Interior’s Standards e valuation of “Old State House” buildings and other properties owned by the State Government of Rhode Island for repair, restoration , and ADA accessibility, Providence, RI, including design recommendations and implementation.
• Evaluation of the state -owned Veteran’s Auditorium in Providence , RI for ADA accessibility.
• Evaluations and historic contexts for multiple County parks for the Los Angeles Department of County Parks and Recreation,
including assessment for the NRHP, SRHP, and County Register. • Cultural Resource Management Plan research and preparation for the Los Angeles Department of County Parks and Recreation. • CEQA evaluation of historical significance and design review of a proposed rehabilitation, San Luis Obispo, CA.
• Administration and monitoring of Congressionally -funded seismic disaster grant projects at Castle Green Apartments, Pasadena , CA; Shrine Auditorium, 665 Western Boulevard, Los Angeles , CA; and Case Study House Number 18, 199 Chautauqua Blvd, Pacific Palisades, CA.
• Field evaluations and recommendations for endangered propertie s at Rocky Mountain National Park, CO.

425 of 561

Jenna Snow, Historic Preservation Consulting ● 323/317-3297 ● [email protected] His
toric Resource Assessment
Silver Spur Stables
1900 Riverside Drive
Glendale, CA 91201
Aug
ust 2018
Exhibit 10
426 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction and Executive Summary........................................................................... 1

II. Consultant Qualifications ................................................................................................ 2

III. Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................. 3 National Register ....................................................................................................... 3 California Register ..................................................................................................... 4 CEQA ......................................................................................................................... 4 City of Glendale ......................................................................................................... 5

IV. Property Description ........................................................................................................ 7 Physical Description.................................................................................................. 7 History ......................................................................................................................... 9

V. Historic Context ................................................................................................................ 14 Equestrians in Glendale............................................................................................ 14 Equestrians in Adjacent Communities ................................................................... 16 Planning for Horses and Equestrians..................................................................... 18 Western Movies and Television Shows ................................................................. 21

VI. Historic Resource Assessment ........................................................................................ 23 Significance ................................................................................................................. 23 Integrity ....................................................................................................................... 25

VII. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 26

VIII. Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 27

Appendix A: Tables of Local Riding Academies
Appendix B: Tables of Local Riding Academies

Attachments
Attachment 1: Current Maps and Aerials
Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting
Attachment 5: Historic Photographs of Setting

427 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report provides an historic resource assessment of the property located at 1900 Riverside Drive in the City of Glendale, California (Assessor Parcel Number 5625-031-008, hereinafter referred to as “subject property”). Initially developed with an office and horse stables in 1939, the subject property was expanded in the 1940s and 1950s with additional stables, a barn, and a single-family home.

The subject property was evaluated for historic and architectural significance in a report prepared by Sapphos Environmental, Inc., dated May 8, 2018.1 That report found the property ineligible for designation in the Glendale Register of Historic Resource (Glendale Register) or for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and therefore not an historical resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

This report provides an expanded analysis, and, based on additional information, comes to the opposite conclusion that the subject property appears individually eligible for listing in both the Glendale and California Registers. In addition, the subject property appears eligible as a contributing resource to a potential historic district eligible for listing in both the Glendale and California Registers for its significant association with local equestrian history. The subject property is located within an equestrian zone at the junction of the cities of Glendale, Burbank and Los Angeles that incorporates commercial and residential properties and provides linkages with bridle trails along the Los Angeles River and within Griffith Park on the opposite side of the river.

As the report concludes that the subject property is eligible for designation in the Glendale and California Registers both individually as well as a part of a potential historic district, this report provides recommendations for future actions to pursue designation.

As a note, the term “equestrian” is used frequently throughout this report. The term is used as a noun to describe “one who rides on horseback” or as an adjective to show something “relating to the act of riding horses.”2 More specifically, the term equestrian may include, though it is not limited to, a person who owns, leases, or trains horses; exercise riders; competitors; groomers; riding instructors; mounted police, sheriffs, or park rangers; and guides or “wranglers” that accompany riders.

1 Sapphos Environmental Inc., “Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property at 1900 Riverside Drive, Final Memorandum For the Record, addressed to Art Simonian, Glendale/Riverside LLC, May 8, 2018. 2 “Equestrian,” Merriam-Webster Dictionary, online database, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equestrian. 428 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 2 II. CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS

This report was prepared by Jenna Snow and Kathryn McGee. Ms. Snow and Ms. McGee visited and photographed the site on June 26, 2018. The site visit was conducted on foot, horseback, and for surrounding residential areas, in a car.

Jenna Snow
In January 2015, Jenna Snow launched an independent historic preservation consulting practice offices in Los Angeles. With over fifteen years of professional experience, Ms. Snow has a strong and broad understanding of best historic preservation practice, including federal, state, and local regulations. She has worked on a wide range of projects on both the east and west coasts, as well as internationally. Ms. Snow holds a M.S. in Historic Preservation from Columbia University and a B.A. in Fine Arts focusing on architectural history from Brandeis University. She meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in Architectural History. Throughout her career, Ms. Snow has authored, co-authored, and/or served as project manager for nearly 100 historic preservation projects, including a wide variety of historic resource assessments, National Register nominations, and historic resources surveys. She regularly contributes to environmental impact reports, historic preservation certification applications, Section 106 reviews and other work associated with historic building rehabilitation and preservation planning. Ms. Snow has prepared multiple National Register nominations, including the Twohy Building in San José, CA; the Beverly Hills Women’s Club in Beverly Hills, CA; the Sam and Alfreda Maloof Compound in Rancho Cucamonga, CA; the Boyle Hotel/Cummings Block in Los Angeles, CA; the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Historic District in Los Angeles, CA, and Temple Ohave Israel in Brownsville, PA.

She has completed historic resources surveys, including coauthoring historic context statements in Hollywood, Whittier, CA, and South Los Angeles. Prior to her consulting work, Ms. Snow worked for the New York City Department of Design and Construction in New York, NY, the Freedom Trail Foundation in Boston, MA, and the Neighborhood Preservation Center in New York, NY.

Kathryn McGee
Ms. McGee is an architectural historian and historic preservation planner based in Los Angeles. She meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in Architectural History and has ten years of experience in the field of historic preservation consulting. She previously worked at historic preservation consulting firm Chattel, Inc. for nearly seven years and launched an independent practice in 2015. Her educational background includes a Bachelor of Arts degree in architectural history from the University of California, Santa Barbara and a Master of Urban and Regional Planning degree from the University of California, Irvine. She has also completed the Summer Program in Historic Preservation at the University of Southern California and is a LEED Accredited Professional with specialty in Neighborhood Development. Her consulting work entails writing reports for purposes of environmental and local project review; preparation of historic resource assessments and surveys; preparation of technical reports for General Plan Updates; evaluation of properties seeking or complying with Mills Act Contracts; and consultation on adaptive reuse and federal Investment Tax Credit projects.

429 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 3 III. REGULATORY SETTING

National Register
The National Register of Historic Places is “an authoritative guide to be used by federal, state, and local governments, private groups, and citizens to identify the nation’s cultural resources and indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment,”3 Administered by the National Park Service, the National Register is the nation’s official list of historic and cultural resources worthy of preservation. Properties listed in the National Register include districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. Resources are eligible for the National Register if they meet one or more of the following criteria for significance:

A) are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B) are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past; or C) embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
D) have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory.4

Once a resource has been determined to satisfy one of the above criteria, then it must be assessed for “integrity.”5 Integrity refers to the ability of a property to convey its significance. Evaluation of integrity is based on “an understanding of a property’s physical features and how they relate to its significance.” The National Register recognizes seven aspects or qualities of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To retain integrity, a property must possess several, and usually most, of these aspects.

Cultural Landscape
The National Park Service provides guidance for evaluating cultural landscapes in Preservation Brief 36:

Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes as per the following:

A Cultural Landscape is defined as, “A geographic area, including both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife or domestic animals therein, associated with a historic event, activity, or person or exhibiting other cultural or aesthetic values.” There are four general types of cultural landscapes, not mutually exclusive: historic sites, historic designed landscapes, historic vernacular landscapes, and ethnographic landscapes.6

The definition most relevant for discussion of the subject property is historic vernacular landscape, defined as follows:

A landscape that evolved through use by the people whose activates or occupancy shaped that landscape. Through social or cultural attitudes of an individual, family or a community, the landscape reflects the physical, biological, and cultural character of those everyday lives.

Function plays a significant role in vernacular landscapes. They can be a single property such

3 National Register Bulletin #16A: How to Complete the National Register Registration Form (National Park Service, 1997). 4 National Register Bulletin #15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Park Service, 1990, revised 2002).
5 National Register Bulletin #15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Park Service, 1990, revised 2002).
6 Charles A. Birnbaum, ASLA, Preservation Brief 36: Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes, National Park Service, September 1994: 1.
430 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 4 as a farm or a collection of properties such as a district of historic farms along a river valley.

Examples include rural villages, industrial complexes, and agricultural landscapes.7

Relationship to this report: The subject property is not listed in the National Register. For the reasons stated in this report, the subject property appears to meet National Register eligibility requirements, both individually and as part of an historic district with a significant cultural landscape. However, the subject property or the identified historic district may not retain sufficient integrity for listing in the National Register. It is important to note that neither the California Register nor the Glendale Register of Historic Resources specifically address cultural landscapes.

California Register
Based substantially on the National Register, the California Register is “an authoritative guide… used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state's historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected.”8 For a property to be eligible for listing in the California Register, it must be found by the State Historical Resources Commission to be significant under at least one of the following four criteria:

1) is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; or
2) is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; or 3) embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual or possesses high artistic values; or
4) has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Also included in the California Register are properties which have been formally determined eligible for listing in, or are listed in the National Register; are registered State Historical Landmark Number 770, and all consecutively numbered landmarks above Number 770; and Points of Historical Interest, which have been reviewed and recommended to the State Historical Resources Commission for listing.

The primary difference between eligibility for listing in the National and California Registers is integrity. Properties eligible for listing in the National Register generally have a higher degree of integrity than those only eligible for listing in the California Register. There is, however, no difference with regard to significance.

Relationship to this report: The subject property is not listed in the California Register. For the reasons stated in this report, the subject property appears to meet California Register eligibility requirements, both individually and as part of an historic district. It is important to note that neither the California Register nor the Glendale Register of Historic Resources specifically address cultural landscapes.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was enacted in 1970 and offers protection for identified historical resources. In general, for purposes of CEQA and environmental review, an “historical resource” is that which has been determined eligible for listing in the California Register, or one that is designated at the local level. The term “historical resource” includes the following:

7 Birnbaum, Preservation Brief 36, 2.
8 California Public Resources Code §5024.1(a), <http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PRC/1/d5/1/2/s5024.1>. 431 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 5

1. A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Pub Res Code SS5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et seq).

2. A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant.

3. Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record.

Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register (Pub Res Code SS5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4852).

The fact that a resource is not listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to 5020.1 (k) of the Public Resources Code), or identified in an historical survey (meeting the criteria in Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in Public Resources Code Sections 5020.1 (j) or 5024.1.

Relationship to this report: For the reasons stated in this report, the subject property appears eligible for listing in the California Register and the City of Glendale Register of Historic Resources, both individually and as part of a historic district, and therefore qualifies as an historical resource under CEQA.

City of Glendale
§15.20.020 of the Glendale Municipal Code provides the following definition of a designated historic resource:9

“Designated historic resource” means any site, building, structure, area or place, man-made or natural, which is historically or archaeologically significant in the cultural, architectural, archaeological, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political or military heritage of the City of Glendale, the State of California, or the United States and which has been designated as historically significant in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or the Glendale Register of Historic Resources.

§15.20.050 of the Glendale Municipal Code provides the following regarding designation of historic resources:10

Upon recommendation of the historic preservation commission, city council shall consider and

9 City of Glendale Municipal Code §15.20.020, http://qcode.us/codes/glendale/view.php?topic=15-15_20-15_20_020&frames=on, accessed July 28, 2018.
10 City of Glendale Municipal Code §15.20.050.
432 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 6 make findings for additions to the Glendale Register of Historic Resources. The designation of any proposed resource in the city as a historic resource shall be granted only if city council first finds that the proposed historic resource meets one (1) or more of the following criteria:

1. The proposed historic resource is identified with important events in national, state, or city history, or exemplifies significant contributions to the broad cultural, political, economic, social, or historic heritage of the nation, state, or city;

2. The proposed historic resource is associated with a person, persons, or groups who significantly contributed to the history of the nation, state, region, or city;

3. The proposed historic resource embodies the distinctive and exemplary characteristics of an architectural style, architectural type, period, or method of construction; or represents a notable work of a master designer, builder or architect whose genius influenced his or her profession; or possesses high artistic values;

4. The proposed historic resource has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to archaeological pre-history or history of the nation, state, region, or city;

5. The proposed historic resource exemplifies the early heritage of the city. (Ord. 5784 § 7, 2012; Ord. 5347 § 7, 2003: Ord. 5110 § 12, 1996: prior code § 21-02)

Relationship to this report: The subject property is not individually listed in the Glendale Register. For reasons stated in this report, the subject property appears to meet local eligibility requirement, both individually and as part of a potential historic district.

433 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 7 IV. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Physical Description
Current maps and aerials are included in Attachment 1, current photographs are included in Attachment 3, and current photographs of the setting are included in Attachment 4.

Setting
Located at 1900 Riverside Drive in the City of Glendale, the subject property is situated within an equestrian-oriented neighborhood spanning areas of Glendale as well as Burbank, positioned among other commercial-equestrian properties on Riverside Drive. Other nearby commercial-equestrian properties include additional horse stables and two feed stores, the TriKee Tack at 1840 Riverside Drive and DaMoors Feed and Tack at 1532 Riverside Drive. The subject property is also adjacent to the Los Angeles Equestrian Center, located to the southwest, which is a large complex of horse stables, arenas, and related buildings. Surrounding residential areas in both Glendale and Burbank are also zoned to accommodate horses and private stables in backyards.

The subject property is located at the intersection of Riverside Drive and Allen Avenue. The subject property faces Riverside Drive, which is the automotive spine of the commercial-equestrian area. For purposes of this report and ease of description, it is assumed Riverside Drive is north of the subject property. East of the subject property, Allen Avenue becomes a dirt road, leading directly to a bridge and then onto a bridle trail to the south. That bridle trail provides linkage to a bridle trail system accessing the equestrian neighborhood and serves as a critical access point from surrounding residential-equestrian properties and to bridges over the Los Angeles River and into Griffith Park, which has over fifty miles of equestrian trails. To access Griffith Park, the trail leads over the Los Angeles River via a bridge and under the 5-Freeway via a tunnel.

Site
The subject property is irregularly shaped and
contains a single-family home, horse stables,
barn with stables, and horse arena. Buildings
and site features are labeled in the adjacent
contemporary aerial photograph (1, see also
Map 6). The property is partially obscured from
the street by a fence covered in vegetation. A
driveway covered by a metal sign at the west
side of the property provides access to a paved
parking area at the north side of the site. The
Arena (Feature E, Figures 29-30) at the west
side of the property, is also visible from the
street. The arena is an open, oval-shaped dirt
area encircled by a wood fence. Wood gates
provide access along the southeast and
southwest borders. Several mature trees are
scattered throughout the site.

Building A: House (Figures 1-5)
The house is a one-story, single-family home, generally rectangular in plan, with board and batten siding. The clay tile roof is hipped with exposed rafter tails. Fenestration generally consists of multi- light, double-hung wood sash sided by fixed shutters. A tower, square in plan, with pyramidal roof extends from the approximate center of the roof. The tower has narrow windows on the north and south elevations. The primary elevation faces east and contains a partial front porch. The porch is covered by a shed roof clad in contemporary composite shingles and is supported on simple wood 1: Current aerial of subject property identifying site features 434 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 8 posts. The main entrance is slightly inset and is sided to the south by a single window. An additional window along this elevation is located south of the porch. Fenestration south of the main entrance includes a double-hung, eight-over-eight wood sash and a double-hung, four-over-four wood sash.

The north elevation contains a single window centered on the elevation. The west elevation contains three, somewhat evenly spaced windows while the south elevation has no articulation.

Building B: Office and Main Stable (Figures 6-19)
The office and main stable is the primary building on the property and is oriented north. It is a long, linear building with multiple parts and multiple rooflines. The central portion is generally rectangular in plan and has a front gable roof with a vented monitor that runs the nearly the whole length.

Exterior walls are clad in board and batten siding. Fenestration consists of wood, double hung sash as well as contemporary vinyl, vertically sliding sash. The main pedestrian entrance is centered on the north elevation, flanked by a pair of windows on either side. A vent under the gable peak is positioned over the main entrance with a metal, horse-themed weathervane placed above on the roof.

Only the front portion of the west elevation is readily visible, revealing a secondary pedestrian door flanked by tall, multi-light wood sash windows. South of the secondary entrance is an irregularly shaped addition. The central portion widens at the south half of the building with two, additional long rectangular sections that are topped by shed roofs. The section along the west elevation is clad in corrugated metal siding while the section along the east elevation is clad in vertical wood siding and concrete block. Similarly, the south elevation is clad in vertical wood siding and includes large barn door openings.

The interior is accessed through pedestrian doors along the north elevation, which lead into a central, double-loaded corridor accessing offices and restrooms at the north end, with horse stalls at the south. At the north end of the corridor, around the office, walls are finished in wood. Toward the south end of the corridor, wood roof trusses are visible. East and west sections are also organized around a central corridor with horse stalls on either side.

Building C: East Stable (Figures 20-22)
The East stable is a long, rectangular building, facing north. It has a flat roof that forms a canopy extending over the open-air northwest elevation. The canopy is supported by a row of wood posts.

Deeply recessed behind the columns is a row of wood and metal horse stalls. North and south elevations consist of unarticulated concrete block.

Building D: Barn (Figures 23-28)
The barn is a tall one-story building, featuring a front gable, metal roof, supported on the interior by visible wood framing. The roof sits higher in the east half, while there is a slightly lower front gable roof in the west half. Exterior walls are generally clad in vertical wood siding. At the primary east elevation, the exterior wall does not extend all the way up to the roof, but leaves the uppermost part of the wall open-air. The main entrance is centered on the elevation and consists of a wide, tall opening and a single swinging wood door that reaches only partly up to the door opening.

Rectangular window openings are placed on either side of the door, though openings have no sash.

The south elevation contains a secondary entrance toward the west side that is also boarded on either side by window openings. The west elevation was not visible, as it closely abuts the neighboring property. The interior consists of are wood and metal stalls for horses and other animals, such as miniature horses, an alpaca, several goats, sheep, ducks, chickens, rabbits, a pig, and two cats.

Immediately adjacent to the north elevation is an additional stable of slightly lower height, with a metal shed roof. The stable is finished similarly to the barn, with exterior walls generally clad in vertical wood siding, leaving some open space between the top of the walls and the roof. The east 435 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 9 elevation contains a doorway, which leads into an aisle between horse stalls. The north elevation, which looks onto the arena, is open with metal bars running across the length of the elevation.

History
Historic maps and aerial photographs are included in Attachment 2. A table of available building permits is included in Appendix A.

History of Construction and Alterations
Buildings at the subject property were generally constructed from 1939 through 1957. In 1939, three separate permits were issued to Charles Kemsley for construction of the stables that now constitute the Office and Main Stables (Building B).11 Permits describe three separate structures, all 28-feet- wide, which were presumably joined to make the one long narrow building. Structures were described as one-story, with wood-on-metal siding, cement foundations, and metal roofs. In 1942, use of the property expanded to encompass a single-family home. A permit was issued to Charles Kemsley for construction of the existing house (Building A).12 The house was planned as a three- room, one-story, 14’x34’ house with cement plaster exterior walls and a concrete foundation. It is likely that Building B was expanded at the time to include the structure at the west, although permits are not available for this expansion. Nor are there available permits for construction of the Barn (Building D) or Arena (Building E), though all of these features appear on historic maps and aerials from 1946 (see Attachment 2, historic aerials 7 and 8).

In 1957, a permit was issued to Sandy Sanders for construction of the East Stables (Building C).13 In 1969, the east part of the Office and Main Stables (Building B) was expanded with a small area for grooming of horses, encompassing a one-story, 215 square-foot, wood-frame shelter with metal roof.14 In 1976, the southeast portion of the Office and Main Stables (Building B) was repaired, with

11 “1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Department of Public Works, Division of Building, Permit No. 13798, April 24, 1939.
“1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Department of Public Works, Division of Building, Permit No. 13799, April 24, 1939.
12 “1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Department of Public Works, Division of Building, Building Permit No. 19942, February 2, 1942.
13 “1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Permit No. 54301, April 14, 1957. 14 “1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, California, Permit No. 53225, October 20, 1969.
2 (left): Sanborn Map of subject property, 1951, with letters identifying current buildings and site features 3 (right): Sanborn Map of subject property 1965, with letters identifying current buildings and site features 436 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 10 the sides raised to 6’-high and new gates added.15 In 1987, the interior of the house (Building A) was rehabilitated, with new paint and other unspecified interior work.16

Alterations
While there have been some alterations, the subject property is generally intact from its primary dates of construction, 1939-1957. The original (1942) building permit for the house (Building A) states that the exterior walls of the house were to be clad in cement plaster finish. However, exterior walls are currently clad in board and batten siding. It is unknown if the current siding is an early alteration, or if the cement plaster walls were simply not constructed as described on the building permit. In 1987, a permit was issued to “fix up” the interior with new paint and other unspecified interior work.17 Building B has sustained some minor alterations as well. One of the north elevation windows, originally wood double hung, has been replaced with contemporary vinyl (no building permit available). Additionally, the original stables were expanded over time as use of the property increased.

In 1969, a grooming area was added.18 In 1976, the southeast portion of Building B was altered, with the sides raised to 6’-high and new gates added.19 However, despite these alterations, the property as a whole appears to retain a high degree of integrity from the period 1939-1957.

History of Ownership
The following history of ownership was compiled based on historic map books of the Los Angeles County Assessor and historic building permits on file with the City of Glendale. The subject property was originally part of a large area of land known as the Rancho Providencia. As early as 1925, members of the Lutge family, including John, Harry, and William Lutge, owned and subdivided land in the area, including the subject property. The subject property encompassed four separate lots at the time, which were sold to Charles Kemsley in 1939. Kemsley subsequently developed the lots with the main stable and office, and single-family home. Title to all four lots was subsequently transferred to Kemsley’s wife, Laura Kemsley, by 1955. Title then transferred to Grover “Sandy” Sanders, who owned the subject property from 1955 through at least 1962, further improving the property by adding the East Stable (Building C). The property appears to have been subsequently owned by Wladyslaw Tomaszewski, as his name appears as the owner on building permits from the early 1960s through 1969. Roger E. Dyrness then owned and operated the Silver Spur Stables at the subject property from at least 1975 through at least 1977. Alex Haagen is listed on building permits as the owner of the subject property in 1987 and Paul A. Hay is listed on building permits as the owner in 1994. Biographies for key historical owners follow.

Charles Kemsley (1883-1959)
Charles Kemsley owned the subject property from 1939 through at least 1949 and was responsible for developing the main stable and office in 1939, and single-family home in 1942. Born about 1883 in Idaho, he moved to Los Angeles by 1930 with his wife, Laura B. Kemsley (born c. 1874) and daughters, Florence and Edna. In 1930, the United States Census lists Charles Kemsley as the proprietor of a riding academy, though the location of that riding academy is unknown.20 Although Charles moved often to different rental properties,21 he was able to purchase the subject property in

15 “1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, California, Permit No. 21268, March 24, 1976.
16 “1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, CA, Permit No. 3750B008, December 16, 1987.
17 “1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, CA, Permit No. 3750B008, December 16, 1987.
18 “1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, California, Permit No. 53225, October 20, 1969.
19 “1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, California, Permit No. 21268, March 24, 1976.
20 “Charles Kemsley,” 1930 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Page: 1A; Enumeration District: 0658; FHL microfilm: 2339896, Ancestry.com. 21 Los Angeles City Directory, 1938: 1122, Ancestry.com. 437 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 11 1939. It doesn’t appear that Charles ever lived at the subject property, and, after 1940, he transferred the riding academy business to his son-in-law, Earl Ludlow.22 It is not known what Charles Kemsley’s motivation was to own and run riding academies.

Grover “Sandy” Sanders (1919-2005)
Grover S. Sanders, known professionally as Sandy Sanders, owned and operated riding stables at the subject property in the mid-1950s. In addition to working at the stables as a riding teacher,23 he was a prolific film actor and stuntman in Western films and television shows, with 81 acting credits and 34 stunt credits. He is best known for his work as Gene Autry’s stunt double on The Gene Autry Show, and such films as The Old West (1952), Cow Town (1950), and Sons of New Mexico (1949).24 He also did stunt work for prolific actor Clayton Moore on the Lone Ranger television series.25 Active in films and television the late 1940s though the 1970s, Sandy Sanders mostly played small rolls in western films and television shows, such as Wagon Train (1958-1964), the aforementioned Lone Ranger series (1949- 1957), The Cisco Kid (1953-1956), The Roy Rogers Show (1952-1953), and the aforementioned The Gene Autry Show (1950-1953). He was frequently cast as the “henchman,” “rider,” “driver,” or other such secondary character.

Grover S. Sanders was born in Hereford, Texas, where his father, also named Grover S. Sanders, worked on a stock farm.26 By 1930, he lived in Kansas with his mother, Tempie Thomas, and stepfather, Earnest B. Thomas.27 Sandy Sanders moved often and by 1940, he lived in Mississippi with his biological father and stepmother, Estella Sanders28 and he served in the United States Army during World War II.29 After the war, he got his start in the industry when he “put up a horse act,” at which time he became acquainted with a film crew and decided to try work in Hollywood.30 He married three times, first to actress Gloria Talbott in 1956,31 then to Maureen May Endicott in 1976,32 and to Maureen Lee Botello in 1988.33

Wladyslaw K. Tomaszewski (1901-1977)
Wladyslaw K. Tomaszewski is listed on building permits as the owner of the subject property from 1960 through 1969. There is little available biographical information about Wladyslaw Tomaszewski.

His name appears in Glendale city directories along with his wife, Stefania Tomaszewski, indicating the couple lived in the residence at the subject property from about 1960 until at least 1972.

Tomaszewski appears to have been a Polish immigrant who worked as a cabinet maker prior to immigrating to the United States. Born Wadyslaw Kazimierez Tomaszewski in Poland in 1901, he entered the United States on the Queen Mary in New York in 1951 and petitioned for naturalization in the United States in 1957.34 As no additional information could be gleaned on Wladyslaw Tomaszewski, his motivation for to purchase the Silver Spur Stables could not be ascertained.

22 “Charles Kemsley,” 1940 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Roll: m-t0627- 00387; Page: 14A; Enumeration District: 60-1129, Ancestry.com. 23 Glendale City Directory, 1955: 418, Ancestry.com.
24 “Sandy Sanders,” Internet Movie Database, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0761708/?ref_=nv_sr_1#archive_footage, accessed July 27, 2018.
25 Harris M. Lentz III, “Sandy Sanders,” Obituaries in the Performing Arts, 2005, Google Books, accessed July 27, 2018. 26 “Grover S. Sanders,” 1920 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Justice Precinct 2, Deaf Smith, Texas; Roll: T625_1790; Page: 6A; Enumeration District: 54, Ancestry.com. 27 “Grover S. Sanders,” 1930 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Shawnee, Johnson, Kansas; Page: 20B; Enumeration District: 0021; FHL microfilm: 2340441, Ancestry.com.
28 “Grover Sanders Junior,” Census Place: Warren, Mississippi; Roll: m-t0627-02074; Page: 12B; Enumeration District: 75-30, Ancestry.com.
29 “Sandy Sanders: Biography,” Metacritic, http://www.metacritic.com/person/sandy-sanders, accessed July 27, 2018. 30 “Sandy Sanders: Biography,” Metacritic, http://www.metacritic.com/person/sandy-sanders, accessed July 27, 2018. “Sandy Sanders: Biography,” Internet Movie Database, https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0761708/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm, accessed July 27, 2018.
31 “Talented Miss Talbott Learns the Hard Way,” Los Angeles Times, April 21, 1957: E1. 32 “Grover Sandy Sanders,” Nevada, Marriage Index, 1956-2005, Ancestry.com. 33 “Grover Sandy Sanders,” Nevada, Marriage Index, 1956-2005, Ancestry.com. 34 “Wladyslaw Kazimierz Tomaszewski,” California, Federal Naturalization Records, 1843-1999, Ancestry.com. 438 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 12

Roger E. Dyrness (1927-2014)
Roger E. Dyrness owned and operated the Silver Spur Stables at the subject property from at least 1975 through at least 1977.35 Born in North Dakota in 1927,36 Roger relocated to the Los Angeles area by 1951, where he married Alma T. Wagner and had three daughters.37 After serving in the United States Army during the Korean War, he moved to Los Encinos Avenue in Glendale, California with his wife.38 From at least 1965 through at least 1972,39 he lived at the same address in Glendale and owned and operated a Chevron gas station. By 1975, he owned and operated the Silver Spur Stables.40 It does not appear he lived at the subject property, though it appears his daughter, Terry Porteous, and her husband, Zack Porteous, lived at the subject property in 1977. Given the limited biographical information on Roger Dyrness, it is not known why he purchased the subject property.

History of Occupants
The following table lists occupants of the subject property based on information provided in Glendale city directories.

Table of Occupants
Date Occupant
1939 No listing for address
1940 No listing for address
1942 Charles Kemsley Riding Academy
1948 E.R. Ludlow (stable)
Chris Carstensen (Restaurant)
Laura Kemsley (owned house)
1951 Mrs. Laura Kemsley (owned house)
E.R. Ludlow
Mom’s Hot Dog Stand
Silver Glen Stables
1953 Mrs. Laura Kemsley (owned house)
E.R. Ludlow
Mom’s Hot Dog Stand
Silver Glen Stables
1955 Sandy Sanders Stables
1960 Silver Spur Stables (listed with address 1902 Riverside Drive) Wladyslaw Tomaszewski (lived in house)
1965 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski (1902 Riverside Drive)
1970 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski (1900 Riverside Drive)
Silver Spur Stables horse boarding and training (1902 Riverside Drive) 1972 Wladyslaw Tomaszewski (1900 Riverside Drive)
Silver Spur Stables horse boarding and training (1902 Riverside Drive) 1977 Zack Porteous (1900 Riverside Drive)
Silver Spur Stables horse boarding and training

Earl R. Ludlow (1903-1993)
Earl R. Ludlow was born in 1903 in California. He completed high school, but did not attend college.

35 “Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1977: 131, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com. 36 “Obituary: Roger E. Dyrness,” The Bulletin, May 1, 2014, https://www.bendbulletin.com/obituaries/2038468-151/roger-e-dyrness. 37 “Roger E Dyrness,” California, Marriage Index, 1949-1959, Ancestry.com. 38 “Roger Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1955: 205, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com. 39 “Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1965: 159, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com.

Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1972: 130, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com. 40 “Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1977: 131, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com. 439 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 13 In 1920, he lived in San Diego with his father, Harry P. Ludlow, who was a farmer born in Indiana.41 Earl worked on the family farm at the time. In 1930, Earl lived as a boarder on Ventura Boulevard in Los Angeles and worked as a farm laborer.42 On February 28, 1935, he married Edna Kemsley in Los Angeles and lived in Glendale.43 In 1939, he is listed in the Glendale city directory, residing at 1110 North Verdugo Road in Glendale and his occupation is listed as “ponies,” presumably in relation to his work at the riding academy at the subject property.44 As previously noted, he appears to have taken over his father-in-law, Charles Kemsley’s, riding academy business at the subject property.

Zack O. Porteous (1955-present)
Zack O. Porteous resided at the house at the subject property with his wife, Terry Porteous, in 1977.45 Zack’s father-in-law, Roger E. Dyrness, owned the subject property at the time. Zack was born in 1955 and married Teresa A. Dyrness in 1976, a year prior to moving to the subject property.46 Given that Zack lived at the subject property in our recent past, there is little available biographical information available about him.

41 “Earl R. Ludlow,” 1920 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Flores, San Diego, California; Roll: T625_130; Page: 9B; Enumeration District: 220, Ancestry.com.
42 “Earl R. Ludlow,” 1930 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Page: 2A; Enumeration District: 0621; FHL microfilm: 2339893, Ancestry.com. 43 “Earl R. Ludlow,” California, County Birth, Marriage, and Death Records, 1849-1980, Ancestry.com. 44 Glendale City Directory, 1939: 279, Ancestry.com.
45 Glendale City Directory, 1977: 377, Ancestry.com.
46 “Zack O. Porteous,” California, Marriage Index, 1960-1985, Ancestry.com. 440 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 14 V. HISTORIC CONTEXT

Equestrians in Glendale
Glendale Commercial-Equestrian Zone
Heralding the significance of California’s horse culture, one 1940 Los Angeles Times article declared,

California has more horse-flesh and more horse people than any place in the country outside of Kentucky…. And the holy ground, the mystic Mecca, the sanctified gathering place for the initiate is out Griffith Park way, north of Los Feliz Blvd., along the banks of that torrential stream known as the Los Angeles River.47

The subject property is located in this “mystic Mecca,” an area historically known as both the “River Bottom” and the “Riverside Rancho.” The River Bottom spans areas of Glendale, as well as adjacent equestrian areas of Burbank and Los Angeles. Both Glendale and Burbank have since zoned the area specifically for equestrian uses (see zoning map 4 below). The commercial equestrian zone currently includes properties on the south side of Riverside Avenue, bounded by and including the subject property to the west and a tributary channel of the Los Angeles River to the east. The larger neighborhood that includes portions of Burbank and Los Angeles not only includes commercial- equestrian properties, but also residential-equestrian properties. Many of the homes were constructed in the late 1930s through the mid-1950s, reaching their height of popularity in the 1940s.

The “River Bottom,” served as an important
center for equestrians in the early 1900s (see
Attachment 5, Figures A-E). Riding academies,
schools for teaching horsemanship, were
established in this location by the 1920s and
became important centers for the equestrian
community. The River Bottom has been home
to horse stables and riding academies, as well as
restaurants, feed stores, and related properties
that service local equestrians. Located in close
proximity to Griffith Park, this commercial-
equestrian center has historically provided, and
continues to provide, access via the local bridle
trail system over the Los Angeles River and into
Griffith Park, where there are over fifty miles of
bridle trails. Thus, the River Bottom served as a critical service area for equestrians as well as point of access to the extensive bridle trail system. Given the close proximity to nearby movie ranches, the River Bottom became an important hub for local Western actors and stuntmen to work, reside, and spend free time. Many important Western films were shot on the nearby movie ranches and in Griffith Park.

The subject property, which has historically housed riding academies, stables, and served as a location for horse training, has always been an essential, central component of the important equestrian neighborhood that spans portions of Glendale, Burbank, and Los Angeles. As the previously quoted 1940 Los Angeles Times article aptly stated,

The temples of the cult are the riding academies. Follow the river from Los Feliz north and west as it curves around Griffith Park to Warner Bros. studio. The stables are thick as ticks and within rifle range of the river. The geographical center of this horsy holiness is Bette

47 “Hoss Auction,” Los Angeles Times, June 2, 1940: H12. 4: Cropped view of city of Glendale zoning map, with area zoned Commercial-Equestrian shown in red crosshatch and approximate location of subject property indicated by arrow. 441 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 15 Davis’ home, situated where the river bends to the west beyond the Grand Central airport.

Here the horse is supreme. Even the homes of the district are known as Riverside ranchos.

And every one of them has a stable for a horse or two just as surely as a ship has a rudder.48

Historic city directories show that by 1923 there were two riding academies in Glendale, the California Riding Academy at 1831 Riverside Drive and the Glendale Riding Academy at 100 Irving Avenue. These businesses were located across Riverside Drive from each other, just a few parcels east of the subject property. The local riding academy industry grew over ensuing decades, with the peak of number of riding academies in the 1940s. There were five riding academies in the 1940s, and three in the 1950s and 1960s. Mirroring this trend, the adjacent equestrian areas in Burbank had eight riding academies in the 1940s and five in the 1950s. The first known riding academy at the subject property was established in 1942, squarely during the height of riding academy popularity. According to historian and horseman Don Burt, the River Bottom was “the horse capital of the western United States at that time.”49 Tables of historic riding academies in Glendale and Burbank are included in Appendix B. Historic Sanborn maps of the Commercial-Equestrian zone in Glendale in 1950 show a concentration of commercial-equestrian properties, as well as residential properties that included stables (see Attachment 2, Sanborn Maps).

Riverside Rancho
The Riverside Rancho, also referred to as the Rancho Neighborhood, is the broad residential- equestrian neighborhood of Burbank and Glendale that is northeast and northwest of the subject property, across Riverside Drive. This area is notable for its historic “semi-rural” design with stables in the backyards of houses.50 Situated on the rim of Griffith Park, property owners have close access to the equestrian trail system. It appears that while some properties were separately constructed in this area, other properties were part of a planned development referred to as the “Riverside Ranchos,” originally developed beginning in the 1930s by the Fritz B. Burns Company and described at the time as an “urban ranch.”51 These properties were especially unique at the time for their accommodation of the horse and connectivity to the local bridle trail system. As noted by historian and horseman Don Burt, “At one time, this area of Burbank was the focal point and home to nearly all of the famous horses and horsemen from the 1930s on.”52 Burt goes on to describe the uniqueness of the housing in the area, stating, “My family bought their first stable there when I was about five or six years old… During that time, there was a real estate development called Riverside Ranchos. If you bought a house, they gave you a horse, and to this day, instead of garages or swimming pools, there is a stable in every backyard on a lot consisting of 50 x 100 feet.”53 Burt is perhaps most poignant in his summary of the charmed local culture: “One of the most significant products generated from this area was the people. Those who grew up there or used it as a layover or watering hole have maintained a lifelong camaraderie. Many to this day stay in touch, from trainers, movie stars, and jockeys to business tycoons and champion cowboys. Horses, movies, and industry have a shared lifestyle, a common thread woven between glamour and nostalgia…”54 Actress Bette Davis moved to the area in 1938, with her home located at 1705 Rancho Drive, adjacent to a swath of open park space now known as the Bette Davis Picnic Area.55

Early advertisements for homes in the Riverside Rancho focused on the primacy of equestrian amenities, noting a certain home was “right in the heart of horse district with 3,200 acres of park to

48 “Hoss Auction,” Los Angeles Times, June 2, 1940: H12. 49 “Ingenuity and Service,” America’s Horse, July/August 2003: 10. 50 “Small-Farms’ Lure Told,” Los Angeles Times, June 13, 1937: E1. 51 Jean Burden, “The House Moved Out to the Horse,” Los Angeles Times, November 6, 1949: H8. 52 Don Burt, Horses & Other Heroes: Recollections and Reflections of a Life with Horses, Connecticut: The Lyons Press, 2002: 132. 53 Burt, 132.
54 Burt, 118.
55 “Bette Davis Picnic Area,” Los Angeles Times, July 9, 2000, http://articles.latimes.com/2000/jul/09/local/me-50135. 442 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 16 ride in.”56 A 1949 advertisement even stated, “Corral? Of course. Why live in Riverside Ranchos if one is not an addict of spur and saddle!”57 Articles about the development described the charms of “semi-rural” living in this “island of peace and quiet,”58 noting, “the semi-rural home is part and parcel of our community planning,” and that Los Angeles County was “ideally situated for this half- city, half-country living.”59 Playing on the romanticized notions of life in the American West, one 1937 advertisement for the Riverside Ranchos stated, “Have you seen Ranch O’Romance Number Two?”60 The Riverside Ranchos featured several demonstration homes described as “modern adobes.”61 One such house, described as a “100-Year Home” that was “built to last until 2037,62 was shown as part of an exhibit focused on its “latest example of groutlock brick masonry construction.”63

The residences in the Riverside Rancho continued to be used in combination with equestrian uses over the ensuing decades. In the late 1970s, approximately 3,500 horses resided in the Riverside Rancho area of Burbank and Glendale, and most houses often came with stables in the backyards.64 Advertisements from the 1970s mentioned stables in backyards and proximity to horse trails as an important feature of the properties.65 As late as 1978, a Los Angeles Times article described the significance of the local community and its adjacency to Griffith Park: “The rancho area, which straddles the southern borders of Glendale and Burbank, is situated at the head of the equestrian trails which lead under the Ventura Freeway into Griffith Park. In addition to the rental and boarding stables in the area, nearby homes are zoned for single-family residences with horses. Thus, rancho houses, which sell at premium prices, often come with a stable in the backyard.”66

Equestrians in Adjacent Communities
Bridges (Attachment 4, Figures 43-46)
So significant was the local equestrian community that efforts had to be made to provide appropriate bridle trails and related amenities in the area. A series of three bridges at Allen Avenue (at the east property line of the subject property), Irving Avenue (at the eastern property line of the Triple R Stables), and Easter Field (adjacent to the Bette Davis Park) connect the City of Glendale to the perimeter of the Los Angeles Equestrian Center. The perimeter bridle trail provides access to the Swinging Bridge, an essential point of conveyance over the Los Angeles River into Griffith Park. By the late 1930s, the need for a bridge was clear, as evidenced by a discussion that occurred at a 1938 Burbank City Council meeting where construction of a bridge connecting equestrian areas to Griffith Park was discussed. Meeting minutes include reference to a letter from Western-genre star Gene Autry, which had been submitted “asking the City Council to lend every effort to see that the privileges of Griffith Park [were] not denied the citizens of Burbank and those who patronize the local stables, by assisting in procuring a permanent crossing over the river at or near Mariposa Street.”67 The bridge was subsequently constructed; in 1939, it was dedicated. As noted in the Los Angeles Times, the finished bridge was presented “to “outdoor-minded” citizens of Los Angeles,

56 “Classified Ad 8 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, June 29, 1947: C10. 57 Jean Burden, “The House Moved Out to the Horse,” Los Angeles Times, November 6, 1949: H8. 58 Jean Burden, “The House Moved Out to the Horse,” Los Angeles Times, November 6, 1949: H8. 59 “Small-Farms’ Lure Told,” Los Angeles Times, June 13, 1937: E1. 60 Advertisement was for the property located at 1712 Riverside Drive, Burbank. “Display Ad 23 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, December 19, 1937: A7. 61 “Display Ad 13 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1938: 14. 62 “The Homebuilder’s Department: House Design Has Strength,” Los Angeles Times, September 19, 1937: F4. 63 The address of this home was not given, though its location was described as being in “Riverside Ranchos, adjoining Griffith Park, on Riverside Drive.”
“Many Visitors View Model Residence,” Los Angeles Times, September 26, 1937: F3. 64 “Riverside Rancho Residents Vow to Resist Changes in Horse-Oriented Community,” Los Angeles Times, August 13, 1978:

GB6.
65 “Classified Ad 86 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, April 28, 1974: K73. 66 “Riverside Rancho Residents Vow to Resist Changes in Horse-Oriented Community,” Los Angeles Times, August 13, 1978:

GB6.
67 Meeting Minutes of the Burbank City Council, August 23, 1938: 151. 443 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 17 Glendale and Burbank,” underscoring the fact that the bridge was to be used by not just citizens of one city, but by those representing all three communities sharing equestrian resources in the area.68 Built at a cost of $12,000, the suspension-type bridge “replace[d] a crossing destroyed when the river channel was widened for flood-control purposes.”69 Additionally, there is a fifth bridge, the Atwater Bridge, currently under construction in the Atwater Village equestrian area (discussed below), which will include special access for equestrians into Griffith Park. This currently underway project underscores the ongoing interest in and importance of the sustainability of equestrian resources. All of the bridges in this area are an integral part of the equestrian trail system and the primary reason most equestrians are able to access Griffith Park. Without the bridges, the only way to access the park as an equestrian would be to trailer horses into the park via Zoo Drive, with parking at the Martinez Arena area of the park.

Atwater Village
In addition to the popular River Bottom area, another equestrian area was established in the 1920s in the Atwater Village neighborhood of Los Angeles, along the east border of Griffith Park. This area began with establishment of the Verdant Equestrian Center in the 1920s, which included stables for up to fifty horses and a single-family home.70 Additional riding clubs, such as the Saddle and Sirloin Riding Club (established in 1927) Paddock Riding Club/Pitchfork Ranch (established in 1930s), and stables, such as the River Ridge Stables (constructed in 1930s), were located in this neighborhood.

The Atwater Village equestrian area was identified in SurveyLA, the City of Los Angeles’ citywide survey of historical resources, as “an excellent example of equestrian-related development…and as one of the last remaining equestrian communities in Los Angeles.” As previously noted, construction of the Atwater Bridge that will provide equestrian access from the Atwater Village Equestrian Area over the Los Angeles River is currently underway.

Griffith Park
Donated to the City of Los Angeles in 1896, Griffith Park was an essential early location for bridle trails in Los Angeles. Construction of trails began in the early 1900s. In 1911, 18,930 feet (or 3.5 miles) of bridle trail were constructed in the park.71 By the 1920s, Griffith Park had become “a favored spot for equestrians,”72 and “spurred the development of equestrian land uses in surrounding areas.”73 Mike Eberts’ Griffith Park: A Centennial History establishes the important relationship between the Griffith Park bridle trails and the resources of the nearby River Bottom area in the 1920s:

Busy businessmen particularly appreciated the park’s close-in wilderness because it gave them a place to ride on weekday mornings before work. By fall 1924, a group of men prominent in the business, professional and social life of the region fell into an informal ritual. After their Friday morning rides, they’d eat breakfast in the park, gathering around a chuckwagon operated as a sideline by local banker Marco Hellman. Afterward, most would ride back to the Griffith Park Riding Academy on Riverside Drive.74

Signaling the ongoing importance of horses in the local community, a massive bridle trail system with over fifty miles of trails was established in Griffith Park beginning in the 1930s. This work was

68 “Equestrian Bridge Ready,” Los Angeles Times, March 16, 1939: I2. 69 “Equestrian Bridge Ready,” Los Angeles Times, March 16, 1939: I2. 70 “Atwater Village Equestrian Historic District,” SurveyLA, Northeast Los Angeles, Historic Districts, Planning Districts, and Multiple-Property Resources, prepared for City of Los Angeles, February 6, 2017: 2. 71 ICF Jones & Stokes, “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park,” as requested by the Cultural Heritage Commission and Office of Historic Resources of the City of Los Angeles, October 20, 2008: 21. 72 Mike Eberts, Griffith Park: A Centennial History, Los Angeles: The Historical Society of Southern California, 1996: 146. 73 “Atwater Village Equestrian Historic District,” SurveyLA, Northeast Los Angeles, Historic Districts, Planning Districts, and Multiple-Property Resources, prepared for City of Los Angeles, February 6, 2017: 2. 74 Eberts, 146.
444 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 18 started in order to help put people back to work during the Great Depression. In 1931, the Los Angeles City Council passed a bond for public improvements that enabled construction of 13 miles of the park’s bridle trail system.75 In 1939, landscape architect Ralph D. Cornell was hired to design a master plan for the park. Eberts writes:

Cornell didn’t forget the park’s equestrians. He proposed a horse entrance paralleling Crystal Springs Drive. He suggested a half-mile-long path for carriages and sulkies along with more conventional equestrians. The path was designed to allow equestrians to enter the park from the stables near its south end without having to mingle with automobile traffic…76

A central trail leading from what is now Allen Avenue adjacent to the subject property served as a feeder from the local equestrian commercial and residential areas of Glendale and Burbank into Griffith Park. However, access for equestrians has required ongoing work. In 1938, the Los Angeles River adjacent to the subject property was channelized due to constant problems with flooding.77 Historic aerial photographs show the subject property flooded in 1938, prior to development with the existing buildings (see Attachment 2, figures 5-6). A bridge known as the Swinging Bridge was subsequently constructed over the channelized river, southwest of the subject property (see Attachment 4, figures 45-46). Equestrians continued accessing Griffith Park, with local equestrian communities in Atwater Village, Glendale, and Burbank, continuing to grow. In 1954, patronage of the Griffith Park bridle paths was 625,520 for the year.78 After years of controversy, in 1955-1957, the 5-Freeway was constructed in Griffith Park, alongside the channelized river.79 A tunnel constructed under the freeway allows equestrians passage into the park from the surrounding bridle trails and equestrian neighborhood. Griffith Park continues to be of central importance to neighboring equestrian communities, providing invaluable space for horses to exercise. Current maps of Griffith Park showing proximity of the subject property to the trail system are included in Attachment 1, Maps 9-10.

Los Angeles Equestrian Center
Formal plans to design and construct the Los Angeles Equestrian Center in the north part of Griffith Park were discussed in the late 1940s. Planning continued for decades, documented by a conceptual drawing from 196080 and in the 1968 Griffith Park Master Plan.81 In 1966, Mayor of Los Angeles Sam Yorty announced the development would be “one of the greatest equestrian show places in the world.”82 While many parts of the Griffith Park Master Plan were contested at the time, “The one major part of the plan that almost no one objected to—the proposed Equestrian Center—continued to move forward.”83 Despite delays, the center was constructed and the first horse show was held in June 1982.84 While the center was a popular place for a variety of horse-related and other social activities, it had financial problems immediately. Due to massive financial debt, the property was leased in 1990 by Del Rey Properties, a Burbank-based company, which took over operations, though the property remained part of Griffith Park, owned by the City of Los Angeles.

Planning for Horses and Equestrians
Despite the importance of local equestrian history, horse-related properties and bridle trails are often under threat of redevelopment or encroachment, or opposition from local residents. For example,

75 Eberts, 152.
76 Eberts, 165.
77 Eberts, 203-204.
78 Eberts, 230.
79 Eberts, 253.
80 Eberts, 366.
81 Griffith Park Master Plan, Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, December 19, 1968. 82 Eberts, 368.
83 Eberts, 237.
84 Eberts, 369.
445 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 19 even in 1949, there were “anti-horse groups” in Burbank that “held that the horse was lovable in its place but not near them.”85 As a result, horses were “restricted to the Rancho District” at the time.

Construction of the 5-Freeway through Griffith Park in 1955-1957 encroached on the equestrian area and brought with it the demand for new large-scale housing projects, especially near Atwater Village.

As a result, in the 1960s and 1970s, two Atwater Village stables were lost to large residential projects.

This included demolition of the Las Flores Stables, formerly home to the private Los Angeles Breakfast Club (established in 1920, constructed on this site in 1937), which was “reserved for some of the city’s most powerful residents, including Leo Carillo, Edward Doheny, and Cecil B. De Mille.”86 A 1986 article in the Los Angeles Times focused on this problem: “Twenty-five years ago, about 40 commercial horse stables clustered along the east bank of the Los Angeles River, just a short distance from the 60 miles of riding trails in Griffith Park. From Atwater to Glendale to Burbank, the stables formed a rural oasis amid the urban sprawl. Today, only 15 commercial stables remain in the area. Development has slowly nibbled away at the equestrian greenbelt.”87

Despite losses, there have been efforts at preservation of equestrian uses. In 1944, an organization known as Equestrian Trails, Inc. was established to focus on maintaining bridle trails and equestrian amenities.88 The organization subsequently grew, forming local branches known as “corrals.”89 By 1954, there were 31 corrals in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, with about 3,500 total members.

The organization still exists today and “is a non-profit organization dedicated to equine legislation, good horsemanship, and the acquisition and preservation of trails, open space and public lands.”90 More recently, in 1985, the Ahmanson Foundation purchased a two-acre equestrian property in Atwater Village, establishing the Ahmanson Equestrian Facility.91 The Los Angeles Police Department subsequently “established a full-time mounted platoon” in 1987 and rented the Ahmanson Equestrian Facility for $1 per year. The mounted unit currently includes 35 full-time personnel.92

In 1986, a plan to demolish the Silver Spur Stables at the subject property and erect condos was denied by the Glendale Board of Zoning Appeals.93 Also in 1986, the Rancho Equestrian Protection Agency was formed and dedicated to “preserving horse properties near Griffith Park along the Los Angeles River in Burbank and Glendale.”94 In 2003, the Children’s Ranch was established on Verdant Street in Atwater Village.95 Founded by Jackie Sloan, the foundation provides “therapeutic equestrian programs to children and teens of all abilities.”96

Identification of equestrian trails in the City of Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) nomination for Griffith Park, HCM No. 942, established important precedent for noting the historic significance of horses and equestrians. The HCM nomination prepared by ICF Jones and Stokes did not initially include detailed information on landscape features of Griffith Park. However, the City of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission requested that additional information about the park’s landscape be prepared prior to designation of the park. ICF Jones and Stokes then prepared a

85 Jackson Mayers, Ph.D., Burbank History, Burbank: James W. Anderson, 1975: 138. 86 Atwater Village Equestrian Historic District,” SurveyLA, Northeast Los Angeles, Historic Districts, Planning Districts, and Multiple-Property Resources, prepared for City of Los Angeles, February 6, 2017: 2-3. 87 “Dwindling of Stables Alarms Equestrians,” Los Angeles Times, October 9, 1986: GD1. 88 “Riding Fans Take Bow for Trails,” Los Angeles Times, July 4, 1954. 89 “Riding Fans Take Bow for Trails,” Los Angeles Times, July 4, 1954. 90 Equestrian Trails, Inc., organization website, https://etinational.com/eti-past-present/. 91 Atwater Village Equestrian Historic District,” SurveyLA, Northeast Los Angeles, Historic Districts, Planning Districts, and Multiple-Property Resources, prepared for City of Los Angeles, February 6, 2017: 2-3. 92 Los Angeles Police Department, organization website, http://www.lapdonline.org/inside_the_lapd/content_basic_view/6347. 93 “Glendale Board Rejects Plan to Demolish Stable, Erect Condos,” Los Angeles Times, November 23, 1986: V_A16. 94 Denise Hamilton, “Board Rejects Plan to Raze Stable, Build Condos,” Los Angeles Times, November 27, 1986: WS5. 95 Atwater Village Equestrian Historic District,” SurveyLA, Northeast Los Angeles, Historic Districts, Planning Districts, and Multiple-Property Resources, prepared for City of Los Angeles, February 6, 2017: 2-3. 96 “The Children’s Ranch,” organization website, http://www.thechildrensranch.org/about-us/. 446 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 20 supplemental document called “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park.”97 The purpose of this report was to “further identify and illustrate the character-defining features of the natural features and designed landscape components of Griffith Park and provide a context for their establishment and development.”98 The report identifies bridle trails as a “component feature” of Griffith Park.99 The report also notes, “One of the primary character-defining features within the wilderness area is the presence of foot and bridle trails, in addition to the vistas that are associated to them… Throughout the wilderness, hiking and equestrian activity are the predominant activities.”100 Additionally, the following character-defining features for pedestrian and bridle trails are provided:101

• Pedestrian trails narrower than bridle trails
• Earthen ground cover, hard packed upon bridle trails often cut directly in to the wilderness • Trails designed to connect various natural and recreational components of the park • Trails designed to take advantage of significant vistas and view sheds • Curved, organic paths
• Trails designed around pre-existing natural features such as trees • When cut into a natural feature, trail acknowledges its contours and shape • Steps of rusticated rockwork embedded into the ground • At lower elevations, trails bordered by eucalyptus and other non-indigenous trees • Foot and equestrian trails often paralleling automobile roads

Recent city planning for equestrian uses in Glendale and Burbank further signals the ongoing importance of equestrian resources to the local community. The City of Glendale’s equestrian area is known as the Horse Overlay Zone (Chapter 30.21 of the Zoning Code) and encompasses an area zoned Commercial-Equestrian, with the subject property and adjacent properties on Riverside Drive, as well as the surrounding residential properties that include horse stables.102 Additionally, the City of Glendale is implementing a multi-phase project to improve the half-mile area along the Los Angeles River in the area located east of the subject property and east of Bette Davis Park. Known as the Glendale Narrows Riverwalk,103 this project is being implemented in phases and has included a small equestrian area along the river that opened in 2012.104 Bridges providing connection over the river into Griffith Park may be part of future project plans, though it is unclear if bridges would provide equestrian trails.105

In the City of Burbank, new zoning and land use policies were adopted in 1993 “to protect the unique equestrian nature of the Rancho area located in the southeast corner of Burbank generally and centered along Alameda Avenue and Riverside Drive.”106 While a draft Rancho Commercial Recreation Master Plan document was created in 1992 for a City Council Study Session, it was not adopted by the City Council. One year later, on May 11 and May 18, 1993, the Burbank City Council

97 ICF Jones & Stokes, “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park,” as requested by the Cultural Heritage Commission and Office of Historic Resources of the City of Los Angeles, October 20, 2008: 1. 98 “Historic Cultural Monument Application for Griffith Park,” Los Angeles Department of City Planning Recommendation Report to the Cultural Heritage Commission, CHC-2008-2724-HCM, October 30, 2008: 9. 99 ICF Jones & Stokes, “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park,” 1. 100 ICF Jones & Stokes, “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park,” October 20, 2008: 21. 101 ICF Jones & Stokes, “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park,” October 20, 2008: 26. 102 City of Glendale Horse Overlay Zone, Zoning Code, Chapter 30.21, http://qcode.us/codes/glendale/view.php?topic=30- 30_21&frames=on, accessed July 28, 2018.
103 “Glendale Narrows Riverwalk Phases II & III Master Plan,” City of Glendale, 2011, available https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showdocument?id=22565.
104 Carren Jao, “Phase One of Glendale Narrows Riverwalk Opens, Bringing Recreational Opportunities to LA River,” KCET, December 12, 2012, https://www.kcet.org/earth-focus/phase-one-of-glendale-narrows-riverwalk-opens-bringing-recreational-opportunities-to-the. 105 Glendale Narrows Riverwalk, Phase III, project website, https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/public- works/projects/glendale-narrows-riverwalk-phase-iii.
106 “Rancho Master Plan,” City of Burbank website, http://www.burbankca.gov/departments/community-development/planning/document- library/specific-plans/rancho-master-plan, accessed July 30, 2018. 447 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 21 adopted new zoning and land use policies for the Rancho (Ord. Nos. 3343, 3344; and Resolution No. 23,927 for equestrian-compatible uses). Although not officially adopted, the Study Session document “is often referenced by Rancho residents as reflecting the intent of the Rancho land use policies and zoning.”107 The current Burbank General Plan (2035) identifies the “Rancho Master Plan” as one of its three specific plans.109 Similar to the City of Glendale, Burbank single-family equestrian-keeping properties are denoted by an “H” on the Zone Maps and defined in the Burbank Municipal Code.

Finally, In September 2018, Governor Jerry Brown signed AB2955, a state bill that authorizes evaluation of equestrian safety when considering traffic speed limits anywhere within the boundaries of the Burbank and Glendale Ranchos, as well as the equestrian communities in the Tujunga- Sunland-Shadow Hills neighborhood of Los Angeles. This bill affords equestrian communities greater safety.

Western Movies and Television Shows
The significance of Western-genre films and television shows in American culture cannot be understated. Author Stuart Miller summarizes this fact in his recent article on the continuing importance of the genre:110

The western has been a movie staple since the pioneering 1903 film, The Great Train Robbery.

It became the dominant genre, especially after the second world war, creating an image – John Wayne – of rugged American self-reliance and manliness. From 1910 through 1960, approximately a quarter of all films featured hats and horses and the television landscape was similarly populated with cowboys.

Miller quotes Syracuse University television scholar Robert Thompson, who emphasizes the continuing primacy of the genre in our culture: “The western has always been the American epic… It’s exciting and violent and huge. We don’t have a single text like The Iliad or The Odyssey but the western is our story.”111

Frequently filmed in the San Fernando Valley, immortalizing “the former ranches of the 19th century” on film,112 Western movies and television shows were often shot in close proximity to the subject property, utilizing the horse stables, riding academies, and other resources of the River Bottom commercial-equestrian neighborhood. The significance of this area for filming dates to 1911, when the first studio in Hollywood, the Nestor Film Company, was established. Nestor Film Company utilized the Providencia Ranch, which later became Lasky Studios and is now Forest Lawn Memorial Park, as its “principal location for filming westerns.” This location is just southwest of the subject property, accessible via the Griffith Park bridle trails. Other significant movie ranches were established nearby, with the filming of Westerns on these properties common. The Republic Studios and CBS Studio Center, active beginning in 1935 and continuing for decades, was located just east of the subject property along the Los Angeles River. This location featured a movie set known as the CBS Western Town, “used for famous television shows such as Zane Grey Theatre, The Rifleman, Wanted Dead or Alive, Gunsmoke, Rawhide, The Big Valley, and Wild Wild West.113 Additionally, Universal Studios had a large ranch property nearby, in the foothills of Mt. Hollywood spanning to the Los

107 “Rancho Master Plan,” City of Burbank website, http://www.burbankca.gov/departments/community-development/planning/document- library/specific-plans/rancho-master-plan, accessed July 30, 2018. 109 Burbank 2035: General Plan, prepared by: AECOM, prepared for: City of Burbank, adopted February 19, 2013, 3-19. 110 Stuart Miller, “The American Epic: Hollywood’s Enduring Love for the Western,” The Guardian, October 21, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/oct/21/western-films-hollywood-enduring-genre. 111 Stuart Miller, “The American Epic: Hollywood’s Enduring Love for the Western,” The Guardian, October 21, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/oct/21/western-films-hollywood-enduring-genre. 112 Marc Wanamaker, Images of America: San Fernando Valley, Charleston: Arcadia Publishing, 2011: 113. 113 Wanamaker, 104-105.
448 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 22 Angeles River near Barham Boulevard.114 Early work of Universal Studios included Westerns starring prolific actor Harry Carey, known for his work in Western films. Warner Brothers Studios, founded in 1912, was also located nearby, with their property located near the Los Angeles River and Barham Boulevard.115 The River Bottom was at the geographic center of these movie ranches, making it an important place for riding academies, horse stables, and related needs of studio horses and movie stuntmen. Historian and horseman Don Burt writes about life in the area in the 1930s:

In those days the River Bottom housed many famous horses and horsemen and became the learning area and watering hole for lots of the Hollywood stars of the era—especially those who made Westerns. I rode across that bridge for many years with Jocko Mahoney (The Range Rider), Wild Bill Elliott (Red Ryder…), Hoot Gibson (who had a club called The Painted Post Saloon), and Jerry Ambler (champion bronc rider who owned the Amble Inn)…116

As summarized by Hollywood historian Marc Wanamaker, “From then on, the Valley became Hollywood’s backlot.”117 There were numerous Westerns filmed in Griffith Park. Famed Western actor John Wayne, who “grew up across the river from Griffith Park in Glendale,” filmed a fight scene from the movie Sagebrush Trail (1933), in Griffith Park.118 Other Westerns filmed in Griffith Park include, but are not limited to: The Great Adventures of Wild Bill Hickok (1938), Wolf Call (1939), The Leather Burners (1943), Split Second (1952), Pirates of Monterey (1947), Hellgate (1952), Thunder Pass (1954), Badlands of Montana (1957), Gun Glory (1957), Return to Warbow (1958), Ride the High Country (1962), and The Gun Hawk (1963).119 It should be noted there have been numerous non-Western films involving horses that were filmed in Griffith Park. Other such films include but are not limited to: the Three Stooges film, Ants in the Pantry (1934), which involved “an ill-advised foxhunt on a Griffith Park bridle path.” The film, Manhattan Love Song (1934), which also involved a ride on the bridle trails; and Julius Caesar (1953), which saw the “Roman legions storm through Bronson Canyon.”120 According to a recent analysis, the park is still the most popular place to film in Los Angeles County, boasting 341 days of production in 2010.121

114 Wanamaker, 107.
115 Wanamaker, 101.
116 Don Burt, Horses & Other Heroes: Recollections and Reflections of a Life with Horses, Connecticut: The Lyons Press, 2002: 133. 117 Wanamaker, 113.
118 E.J. Stephens and Marc Wanamaker, Images of America: Griffith Park, Charleston: Arcadia Publishing, 2011: 78. 119 Stephens and Wanamaker, 83-125.
120 Stephens and Wanamaker, 83-125.
121 Stephens and Wanamaker, 127.
449 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 23 VI. HISTORIC RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Significance
National and California Registers
Because eligibility criteria for local City of Glendale Historic Resource designation align in large degree with eligibility criteria for National and California Registers, the following evaluation considers eligibility under each of the criteria at federal, state and local levels under a single heading. The City of Glendale includes an additional criterion for evaluation, which is noted below as Criterion 5.

Criterion A/1/1: Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and cultural heritage.

The subject property appears significant for association with equestrian history in Glendale and the broader equestrian community encompassing portions of Burbank and Los Angeles. Developed with horse stables beginning in 1939 and expanded through 1957, the subject property is located on Riverside Drive in a commercial-equestrian area historically known as the River Bottom. The property has been in continuous use providing horse stables and a riding academy since its inception, while also including a single-family home that has often housed a riding academy proprietor.

The River Bottom was historically, and continues to be, an essential center for the equestrian community, providing stables, riding academies, feed stores, and other related amenities, especially linkages to surrounding bridle trails for equestrians living in the adjacent “Riverside Rancho” neighborhood. Allen Avenue, which runs alongside the subject property, provides a key point of access to a major bridle trail system, including over fifty miles of bridle trails in Griffith Park. Thus, developed when the River Bottom was at its height of use for riding academies, the subject property has long been a central component of the local equestrian ecosystem.

The subject property is one of the few remaining commercial-equestrian properties in Glendale.

Given that there are few commercial-equestrian properties in Glendale, those that remain are highly significant for representing the City’s important equestrian history. Therefore, the subject property appears eligible under Criterion A/1/1, with a period of significance beginning with construction of the first stable in 1939 and extending through expansion of the stables in 1957.

Criterion B/2/2: Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.

The subject property was evaluated for potential significance for association with the lives of persons important in our past, specifically property owners and tenants. The subject property appears significant for association with owner-operator Grover “Sandy” Sanders (1919-2005) who owned the subject property in the 1950s and expanded the stables in 1957. In addition to working at the stables as a riding teacher, he was a prolific film actor and stuntman in Western films and television shows, with 81 acting credits and 34 stunt credits. He is best known for his work as Gene Autry’s stunt double. Sandy Sanders appears to have been a person important in our past for his work on Western- genre films. He did his important work as a stuntman in conjunction with his operation of stables and a riding academy at the subject property. Therefore, the subject property appears eligible under Criterion B/2/2.

Criterion C/3/3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual or possesses high artistic values.

The subject property was evaluated for potential significance for association with its architecture.

Given the relatively utilitarian nature of the stables and single-family home, none of the buildings or structures at the subject property are high-style or qualify as having high artistic values. Furthermore, they cannot be attributed to the work of an important creative individual. Therefore, the subject property does not appear eligible under Criterion C/3/3.

450 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 24 Criterion D/4/4: Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

The subject property cannot be reasonably expected to yield information important in prehistory or history; therefore, it is not eligible under Criterion D/4/4.

City of Glendale Criterion 5: The proposed historic resource exemplifies the early heritage of the city.

As described above under Criterion A/1/1, the subject property appears to be significant for its association with the history of the local equestrian community in Glendale, and is one of the few remaining commercial-equestrian properties in the City. Therefore, it is eligible under City of Glendale Criterion 5.

Evaluation as Contributor to Historic District
In addition to being individually significant, the subject property appears to be significant as part of a potential California Register- and City of Glendale-eligible historic district of commercial-equestrian properties. The boundaries of the potential district align with the boundaries of the existing commercial-equestrian-zoned properties located on the south side of Riverside Drive, bounded by and including the subject property to the west and the tributary channel that feeds into the Los Angeles River to the east. The potential district includes all of the five properties in this area that are currently zoned commercial-equestrian, with a period of significance beginning in 1939 and ending in 1978, encompassing all dates of construction. Contributing properties would include the following:

• 1900 Riverside Drive (APN 5625-031-008), buildings constructed 1939-1957 • 1840 Riverside Drive (APN 5625-031-009), buildings constructed 1930-1943 • 1830 Riverside Drive (APN 5625-031-010), building constructed 1973 • 1820 Riverside Drive (APN 5626-006-002), building constructed 1949 • 110 Irving Avenue (APN 5626-006-001), buildings constructed 1940-1978

Individual properties appear to have been in constant use as equestrian properties since their dates of construction and to collectively retain sufficient integrity to convey a strong sense of time and place from the period of significance, 1939-1978. The potential district appears to be part of an important Cultural Landscape and specifically as a historic vernacular landscape relating to local equestrian history.

In addition, this historic district is also significant for its role in the making of Western-genre movies and television shows. Centrally located between major movie ranches and studios, the River Bottom played a key role serving the needs of such filmmaking by providing stables, horse rentals, riding academies, and skilled horsemen. Western-genre were commonly shot on nearby movie ranches, movie studios, and in Griffith Park, which is the most popular place to film in Los Angeles County.

As established in this report, Westerns have had profound influence on American culture nation- wide; their filming in the areas surrounding the River Bottom is an essential aspect of the history of the genre.

It is possible a historic district also includes adjacent and nearby residential properties that have historically had horse stables in their backyards, thereby contributing to the history of the equestrian neighborhood. Properties further east along the south side of Riverside Drive, bordered by Rancho Avenue and Victory Boulevard to the east, appear most likely to be potential district contributors.

These properties have direct access to open parkland and bridle trails to the south and a strong physical connection to the commercial-equestrian properties to the west. There are also residential properties that historically had horse stables located north of Riverside Drive that may also be contributors. Inclusion of residential-equestrian properties in the potential district warrants further study in order to determine integrity of individual contributors and specifically whether or not properties retain horse stables and contribute to a sense of time and place reflecting the history of the equestrian neighborhood.
451 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 25 Integrity
As previously noted, once a resource has been determined to satisfy at least one of the above criteria, then it must be assessed for “integrity.”122 Integrity refers to the ability of a property to convey its significance. Evaluation of integrity is based on “an understanding of a property’s physical features and how they relate to its significance.” The National Register recognizes seven aspects or qualities of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To retain integrity, a property must possess several, and usually most, of these aspects.

• Location: None of the buildings at the subject property have been moved; therefore, the subject property retains integrity of location.
• Design: The buildings and structures at the subject property have sustained some alterations to design, especially as horse stables have been expanded over time to accommodate increasing use. However, such alterations appear to convey ongoing significance of the property and do not diminish the ability to read the essential plan, mass, and form of the original stables. Therefore, the subject property retains integrity of design. • Setting: The subject property is situated amongst other historic commercial-equestrian properties along Riverside Drive and continues to have access to the adjacent bridle trail system via Allen Avenue, as well as access into the bridle trails of Griffith Park. There is a strong sense of time and place in this area. Therefore, the subject property retains integrity of setting.
• Materials: The buildings and structures at the subject property have sustained some loss of materials, such as to windows at Building B. However, in general, the majority of early materials are intact. Therefore, the subject property retains integrity of materials. • Feeling and Association: The subject property closely recalls its historical association with Glendale’s equestrian history through its retention of elements of design and materials, and context adjacent to other equestrian uses, and therefore retains integrity of feeling and association.

The subject property is significant for its history as an equestrian property. Because its important associations aren’t necessarily related to architectural design, the property can sustain more alterations than a property significant for architecture, while still being eligible as an historical resource. The subject clearly retains sufficient integrity to convey its significance and eligibility for the California Register and as a City of Glendale Historic Resource. However, it may not retain sufficient integrity for listing in the National Register, due to alterations.

122 National Register Bulletin #15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Park Service, 1990, revised 2002).
452 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 26 VII. CONCLUSION

The subject property was evaluated in this report for historic significance and was found individually eligible for listing in California Register and as a City of Glendale Historic Resource. The subject property was also found eligible as a contributing resource to a California and Glendale Register- eligible historic district of equestrian properties in Glendale. The subject property is in a unique location adjacent to the bridle trail system that feeds into Griffith Park from surrounding communities of Glendale, Burbank and Los Angeles. With horse-related buildings constructed beginning in 1939 through 1957, the property has been in continuous use providing horse stables and a riding academy since its inception, while also including a single-family home that has often housed a riding academy proprietor or other local equestrian. As the subject property has sustained some alterations, it therefore does not appear to retain sufficient integrity for listing in the National Register.

The subject property is situated amongst other commercial-equestrian properties that provide horse stables, riding academies, a feed store, and related uses. Individual properties appear to have been in constant use as equestrian properties since their dates of construction and to collectively retain sufficient integrity to convey a strong sense of time and place from the period of significance, 1939- 1978. Given that equestrian properties in the region are increasingly rare and under near constant threat of redevelopment, preservation of remaining resources is essential to the preservation of equestrian history.

Listing the subject property in the Glendale Register, either individually or as part of historic district, requires owner consent. While listing the subject property, either individually or as part of a historic district in the California Register does not require owner consent, a property or properties will not be listed over owner’s objections. In those situations, the State Historic Resources Commission will formally determine the property eligible for listing. Based on these requirements, it would be most straightforward to nominate the subject property for listing in the California Register for individual designation. Furthermore, designation as part of a historic district would require quite a bit of outreach to property owners of contributing properties.

As noted above, it is possible a historic district also includes adjacent and nearby residential properties that have historically had horse stables in their backyards. However, identification of boundaries as well as a contributing properties would require a more focused investigation that was outside the scope of this report.

453 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 27 VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Articles

“Bette Davis Picnic Area,” Los Angeles Times, July 9, 2000, http://articles.latimes.com/2000/jul/09/local/me-50135.

Burden, Jean, “The House Moved Out to the Horse,” Los Angeles Times, November 6, 1949: H8.

“Classified Ad 8 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, June 29, 1947: C10.

“Classified Ad 86 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, April 28, 1974: K73.

“Display Ad 13 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1938: 14.

“Display Ad 23 – No Title,” Los Angeles Times, December 19, 1937: A7.

“Dwindling of Stables Alarms Equestrians,” Los Angeles Times, October 9, 1986: GD1.

“Equestrian Bridge Ready,” Los Angeles Times, March 16, 1939: I2.

“Glendale Board Rejects Plan to Demolish Stable, Erect Condos,” Los Angeles Times, November 23, 1986: V_A16.

Hamilton, Denise, “Board Rejects Plan to Raze Stable, Build Condos,” Los Angeles Times, November 27, 1986: WS5.

“Hoss Auction,” Los Angeles Times, June 2, 1940: H12.

“Ingenuity and Service,” America’s Horse, July/August 2003: 10.

Jao, Carren, “Phase One of Glendale Narrows Riverwalk Opens, Bringing Recreational Opportunities to LA River,” KCET, December 12,
2012, https://www.kcet.org/earth-focus/phase-one-of-glendale-narrows-riverwalk-opens-bringing-recreational- opportunities-to-the.

“Many Visitors View Model Residence,” Los Angeles Times, September 26, 1937: F3.

Miller, Stuart “The American Epic: Hollywood’s Enduring Love for the Western,” The Guardian, October 21, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/oct/21/western-films-hollywood-enduring- genre.

“Riding Fans Take Bow for Trails,” Los Angeles Times, July 4, 1954.

“Riverside Rancho Residents Vow to Resist Changes in Horse-Oriented Community,” Los Angeles Times, August 13, 1978: GB6.

“Small-Farms’ Lure Told,” Los Angeles Times, June 13, 1937: E1.

“The Homebuilder’s Department: House Design Has Strength,” Los Angeles Times, September 19, 1937: F4.

454 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 28 Books

Burt, Don, Horses & Other Heroes: Recollections and Reflections of a Life with Horses, Connecticut: The Lyons Press, 2002: 118.

Eberts, Mike, Griffith Park: A Centennial History, Los Angeles: The Historical Society of Southern California, 1996

Mayers, Jackson, Ph.D., Burbank History, Burbank: James W. Anderson, 1975: 138.

Stephens, E.J. and Marc Wanamaker, Images of America: Griffith Park, Charleston: Arcadia Publishing, 2011: 78.

Wanamaker, Marc, Images of America: San Fernando Valley, Charleston: Arcadia Publishing, 2011: 113.

Building Permits

“1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Department of Public Works, Division of Building, Permit No. 13798, April 24, 1939.

“1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Department of Public Works, Division of Building, Permit No. 13799, April 24, 1939.

“1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Department of Public Works, Division of Building, Building Permit No. 19942, February 2, 1942.

“1900 Riverside Drive,” Application for Building Permit, City of Glendale, Permit No. 54301, April 14, 1957.

“1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, California, Permit No. 53225, October 20, 1969.

“1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, California, Permit No. 21268, March 24, 1976.

“1902 Riverside Drive,” Application for a Building Permit, Building Section, Public Works Division, City of Glendale, CA, Permit No. 3750B008, December 16, 1987.

Biographical Information

Charles Kemsley

“Charles Kemsley,” 1930 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Page: 1A; Enumeration
District: 0658; FHL microfilm: 2339896, Ancestry.com.

“Charles Kemsley,” 1940 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Roll: m-t0627-00387; Page: 14A; Enumeration District: 60-1129, Ancestry.com.

“Charles Kemsley,” California, Death Index, 1940-1997, Ancestry.com.

Los Angeles City Directory, 1938: 1122, Ancestry.com.

455 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 29 Earl R. Ludlow

“Earl R. Ludlow,” 1920 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Flores, San Diego, California; Roll: T625_130; Page: 9B; Enumeration District: 220, Ancestry.com.

“Earl R. Ludlow,” 1930 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Page: 2A; Enumeration District: 0621; FHL microfilm: 2339893, Ancestry.com.

“Earl Ludlow,” 1940 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Roll: m-t0627-00387; Page: 14A; Enumeration District: 60-1129, Ancestry.com.

“Earl R. Ludlow,” California, County Birth, Marriage, and Death Records, 1849-1980, Ancestry.com.

Glendale City Directory, 1939: 279, Ancestry.com.

“Earl R. Ludlow,” U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com.

Grover “Sandy” Sanders

Glendale City Directory, 1955: 418, Ancestry.com.

“Grover S. Sanders,” 1920 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Justice Precinct 2, Deaf Smith, Texas; Roll: T625_1790; Page: 6A; Enumeration District: 54, Ancestry.com.

“Grover S. Sanders,” 1930 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Shawnee, Johnson, Kansas; Page: 20B; Enumeration District: 0021; FHL microfilm: 2340441, Ancestry.com.

“Grover Sanders Junior,” Census Place: Warren, Mississippi; Roll: m-t0627-02074; Page: 12B; Enumeration District: 75-30, Ancestry.com.

“Grover Sandy Sanders,” Nevada, Marriage Index, 1956-2005, Ancestry.com.

“Grover S. Sanders,” U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com.

“Sandy Sanders: Biography,” Internet Movie Database,
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0761708/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm, accessed July 27, 2018.

“Sandy Sanders,” Internet Movie Database,
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0761708/?ref_=nv_sr_1#archive_footage, accessed July 27, 2018.

Harris M. Lentz III, “Sandy Sanders,” Obituaries in the Performing Arts, 2005, Google Books, accessed July 27, 2018.

“Sandy Sanders: Biography,” Metacritic, http://www.metacritic.com/person/sandy-sanders, accessed July 27, 2018.

“Talented Miss Talbott Learns the Hard Way,” Los Angeles Times, April 21, 1957: E1.

Roger E. Dyrness

“Obituary: Roger E. Dyrness,” The Bulletin, May 1, 2014, https://www.bendbulletin.com/obituaries/2038468-151/roger-e-dyrness.

456 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 30 “Roger E Dyrness,” 1940 United States Federal Census, Census Place: Pleasant Prairie, Eddy, North Dakota; Roll: m-t0627-03000; Page: 2B; Enumeration District: 14-15, Ancestry.com.

“Roger E Dyrness,” California, Marriage Index, 1949-1959, Ancestry.com.

“Roger Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1955: 205, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com.

“Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1965: 159, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com.

“Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1972: 130, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com.

“Roger E Dyrness,” Glendale City Directory, 1977: 131, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Ancestry.com.

Wladyslaw K. Tomaszewski

“Wladyslaw Kazimierz Tomaszewski,” California, Federal Naturalization Records, 1843-1999, Ancestry.com.

“Wladyslaw K. Tomaszewski,” U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com.

“U.S. Will Never Desert Poland, Gronouski Says,” Los Angeles Times, September 28, 1964, E7.

Zack O. Porteous

Glendale City Directory, 1977: 377, Ancestry.com.

“Zack O. Porteous,” California, Marriage Index, 1960-1985, Ancestry.com.

City Directories

City directories for Burbank, Glendale, and Los Angeles, various years, Ancestry.com and Los Angeles Public Library.

City Planning Documents

“Atwater Village Equestrian Historic District,” SurveyLA, Northeast Los Angeles, Historic Districts, Planning Districts, and Multiple-Property Resources, prepared for City of Los Angeles, February 6, 2017.

Burbank 2035: General Plan, prepared by: AECOM, prepared for: City of Burbank, adopted February 19, 2013.

City of Glendale Horse Overlay Zone, Zoning Code, Chapter 30.21, http://qcode.us/codes/glendale/view.php?topic=30-30_21&frames=on, accessed July 28, 2018.

“Glendale Narrows Riverwalk Phases II & III Master Plan,” City of Glendale, 2011, available https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showdocument?id=22565.

Glendale Narrows Riverwalk, Phase III, project website, https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/public-works/projects/glendale-narrows-riverwalk- phase-iii.

457 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 31 Griffith Park Master Plan, Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, December 19, 1968.

“Historic Cultural Monument Application for Griffith Park,” Los Angeles Department of City Planning Recommendation Report to the Cultural Heritage Commission, CHC-2008-2724- HCM, October 30, 2008.

ICF Jones & Stokes, “Landscape Elements of Griffith Park,” as requested by the Cultural Heritage Commission and Office of Historic Resources of the City of Los Angeles, October 20, 2008.

List of Comprehensive General Plan Elements, City of Glendale, April 2009, https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=820.

City of Glendale Historic Preservation Element of the General Plan, Glendale Planning Division, September 1997, https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showdocument?id=833.

Meeting Minutes of the Burbank City Council, August 23, 1938: 151.

“Rancho Master Plan,” City of Burbank website, http://www.burbankca.gov/departments/community- development/planning/document-library/specific-plans/rancho-master-plan, accessed July 30, 2018.

National Park Service Guidance

Birnbaum, Charles A., ASLA, Preservation Brief 36: Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes, National Park Service, September 1994: 1.

National Register Bulletin #15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (National Park Service, 1990, revised 2002).

National Register Bulletin #16A: How to Complete the National Register Registration Form (National Park Service, 1997).

Reports

Sapphos Environmental Inc., “Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property at 1900 Riverside Drive, Final Memorandum For the Record, addressed to Art Simonian, Glendale/Riverside LLC, May 8, 2018.

Websites

“Equestrian,” Merriam-Webster Dictionary, online database, https://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/equestrian.

Equestrian Trails, Inc., organization website, https://etinational.com/eti-past-present/.

Los Angeles Police Department, organization website,
http://www.lapdonline.org/inside_the_lapd/content_basic_view/6347.

“The Children’s Ranch,” organization website, http://www.thechildrensranch.org/about-us/.

458 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 32 Appendix A: Table of Building Permits

Date Permit No. Work Owner Architect Contractor Valuation April 24,
1939
13798 Erect stable at
1900 Riverside
Drive in rear of
lot. Stable to be
28’x39.5’, one-
story, with wood
on metal siding,
shingle and metal
roof, and cement
foundation.

Charles
Kemsley
Not given Permit says
“same”
$1,000.00
April 24,
1939
13799 Erect stable at 107
Allen Avenue in
center of lot.

Stable to be
28’x57’, one-story,
with wood on
metal siding,
cement
foundation, and
shingles and metal
roof.

Charles
Kemsley
Not given Owner $500.00
May 4,
1939
14554 Erect two-room
stable at 1900
Riverside Drive in
center of lot.

Stable to be one-
story, 28’x51.5’,
with metal siding,
cement
foundation,
exterior walls of
wood, metal
roofing.

Charles
Kemsley,
2423
Langdale
Ave, Los
Angeles
None Owner $1,500.00
February
2, 1942
19942 Erect 3-room
residence at 1900
Riverside Drive in
front of lot. House
to be one-story,
14’x34’, with
cement plaster
exterior finish, and
concrete
foundation.

Charles
Kemsley
Not given Henry
Hansen,
Glendale
$2,300.00
April 27,
1951
Not visible Sewer and
cesspool work at
1900 Riverside
Drive.

Laura
Kemsley
N/A Leo C.

Tapia
Not given
May 17,
1951
Not visible Sewer and
cesspool work at
1900 Riverside
Drive.

Laura
Kemsley
N/A Leo C.

Tapia
Not given
April 15,
1957
54301 Erect stable for
horses at 1900
Riverside Drive.

Sandy
Sanders
Johnson
and Engen,
5159
Owner $11,000.00
459 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 33 Date Permit No. Work Owner Architect Contractor Valuation Stable to be one-
story and hold 9
stalls, with
concrete block
exterior walls; felt,
sheeting, and pea
gravel roof;
concrete block,
wood and wire
interior walls; and
decomposed
granite floors.

Cahuenga
Boulevard
November
4, 1960
32 Certificate of Use
and Occupancy
for existing
boarding stable at
1902 Riverside
Drive.

W.K.

Tomaszewski

N/A N/A N/A
December
10, 1962
49425 Electrical permit
for 6 fixtures at
1900 Riverside
Drive.

Silver Spur
Stables
N/A Pacific
Southwest
Electric
N/A
April 2,
1963
54373 Plumbing permit
for 1902 Riverside
Drive, for water
closets and/or
anti-syphon
ballcock and 2
lavatories.

Silver Spur
Stables
N/A Les Green
Plumbing
N/A
May 11,
1965
90923 Plumbing permit
for water systems,
without fixtures, at
1900 Riverside
Drive.

W.K.

Tomaszewski
N/A Dot
Plumbing
Co.

N/A
May 9,
1966
08544 Plumbing permit
for water heaters
and/or vents at
1900 Riverside
Drive.

W.K.

Tomaszewski
N/A Dot
Plumbing
Co.

N/A
August 15,
1968
38657 Building permit
for fire sprinkler.

Silver Spur
Stables
N/A Kilian Fire $5,800.00
October
20, 1969
53225 Construct shelter
for grooming of
horses, one-story,
215 sq. ft., wood
roof framing,
metal roof
covering material,
wood partitioning
material.

W.

Tomaszewski,
1902
Riverside
Drive
N/A Owner $700.00
December
8, 1975
467 Certificate of Use
and Occupancy
for existing stable
at 1902 Riverside
Drive.

Roger
Dyrness
DBA Silver
Spur Stables

N/A N/A N/A
460 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 34 Date Permit No. Work Owner Architect Contractor Valuation March 24,
1976
21268 Repair sides of
stable at 1902
Riverside Drive,
raise sides to 6’-
high, add front
and new gates.

Roger
Dyrness
N/A N/A $250.00
December
4, 1987
3750B008 Rehab existing
facilities in house
at 1902 Riverside
Drive, paint and
fix-up, interior
work only as per
city letter.

Alex Haagen
III, 8556
Wilshire
Blvd, Beverly
Hills
Don
Picken,
Reseda
Richard C.

C. Lee
$10,000.00
December
16, 1987
3747B008 HVAC or
Refrigeration
permit for air
handling units.

Alex Haagen N/A Richard C.

C. Lee
N/A
December
16, 1987
3748B008 Electrical Permit
for 1900-1902
Riverside Drive,
for replacement of
four outlets.

Alex Haagen N/A Richard C.

C. Lee
N/A
December
16, 1987
3749B008 Plumbing permit
for 1902 Riverside
Drive, for showers
and/or pan; water
closets and/or
anti-syphon
ballcock;
lavatories; sinks,
kitchen, bar, floor,
service, with 4
new fixtures.

Alex Haaagen N/A Richard C.

C. Lee
N/A
May 26,
1994
P10044566 Plumbing permit
for industrial
waste interceptor
at 1900-02
Riverside Drive.

Paul Hay,
1900 and
1902
Riverside
Drive
N/A California
Sewer Co.

N/A
August 22,
1994
14420 Certificate of Use
and Occupancy
for existing legal
structure or
building at 1900
Riverside Drive,
for “Stables for
Horses (Boarding
of Pleasure
Horses)”, 14,300
square feet.

Paul A. Hay
Jr. DBA
Double H.

Stables

N/A N/A N/A

461 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 35 Appendix B: Tables of Local Riding Academies

Table of Riding Academies in Glendale by Year (based on city directories) Year Business Location
1923123
California Riding Academy 1831 Riverside Drive
Glendale Riding Academy 100 Irving Avenue
1930124
California Riding Academy 1831 Riverside Drive
1940125
F. O. Bailes 1850 Riverside Drive
G. R. Johnson 155 Irving Avenue
1948:126
F. O. Bailes Jr. 1800 Riverside Drive
W. W. Blesing 221 Irving Avenue
Jack House 100 Irving Avenue
E. R. Ludlow 1900 Riverside Drive
Olmstead Bros 1850 Riverside Drive
1954:127
Fred O. Bailes Jr. 1830 Riverside Drive
Myers & Wills 1850 Riverside Drive
Silver Glenn Stables 1900 Riverside Drive
1960:128
Fred Bailes Stables 1830 Riverside Drive
L. C. Goss Stables 1850 Riverside Drive
Ride Awhile Stables 1850 Riverside Drive
1965:129
L. C. Goss Stables 1850 Riverside Drive
Ride Awhile Stables 1850 Riverside Drive
Rocking Horse Stables, Inc. 1830 Riverside Drive
1975: No listings
1977130
Circle T Inter-Valley Ranch 5142 Dunsmore Avenue

Table of Riding Academies in Burbank by Year (based on city directories) Year Business Location
1936131
Continental Riding Academy 914 S Mariposa
F.C. Doyle 902 Main
R.L. Kirk 822 S Mariposa
1939132
W.H. Fickett 1001 Main
William Hagan 1031 Main

123 Glendale City Directory, Western Directory Company, 1923: 761, Ancestry.com. 124 Glendale City Directory, Glendale Directory Company, 1930: 765, Ancestry.com. 125 Glendale City Directory, Glendale Directory Company, 1940: 474, Ancestry.com. 126 Glendale City Directory, Glendale Directory Company: 1948: 620, Ancestry.com. 127 Polk’s Glendale Classified Business Directory, 1954: 43, Ancestry.com. 128 Polk’s Glendale City Directory, 1960: 95, Ancestry.com. 129 Glendale City Directory, 1965: 100, Ancestry.com.
130 Glendale City Directory, 1977: 98, Ancestry.com.
131 Burbank City Directory: 1936: 340, Ancestry.com.
132 Burbank City Directory: 1939: 437, Ancestry.com.
462 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA 36 Year Business Location
1940133
Walter Browne 910 S Mariposa
John Dinneen 806 S Mariposa
W.H. Fickett 1001 Main
William Hagan 1031 Main
Midwick Stables 430 Riverside Drive
Pickwick Stables 1216 Riverside Drive
Pico Stables 420 Riverside Drive
Teel Lee Stables 470 Riverside Drive
1952134
Dincara Stock Farm 806 S Mariposa
Pickwick Stables 1006 Riverside Drive
Pico Stables 420 Riverside Drive
Ride-A-While Stables 1021 Main
Rocking Horse Stable 470 Riverside Drive
1969135
Silver Spur Stable 1902 W Riverside Drive
1970 No listings

133 Burbank City Directory, 1940: 580-582, Ancestry.com. 134 Burbank City Directory, 1952: 1019, Ancestry.com.
135 Burbank City Directory, 1969: 203, Ancestry.com.
463 of 561

Attachment 1: Current Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Map 1: Location map, subject property at center in yellow (source: Los Angeles County Assessor) Map 2: Parcel map, subject property outlined in red (source: Los Angeles County Assessor) N Assumed
N
N Assumed
N
464 of 561

Attachment 1: Current Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Map 3: Current aerial, subject property at center (source: Google, 2018) Map 4: Current aerial, subject property outlined in yellow (source: Google, 2018) N
N Assumed
N
N Assumed
N
465 of 561

Attachment 1: Current Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Map 5: Current aerial, view southeast, subject property outlined in white dashed line, site features identified with let- ters (source: Emily Gabel-Luddy, 2018)
Map 6: Current aerial, view northwest, subject property outlined in white dashed line (source: Emily Gabel-Luddy, 2018)
Silver Spur Stables
B
C
D
E
A
Silver Spur Stables
A
B
C
E
D
Bridle Trail
LA Equestrian Center
stables
feed store
stables
feed store
stables
N Assumed
N
466 of 561

Attachment 1: Current Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Map 8: City of Burbank map showing areas addressed by land use policies for equestrian areas, adopted as a General Plan amendment, approximate location of subject property indicated by arrow (source: City Council Resolution No. 23,927, 1993).

Map 7: Current City of Glendale zoning map, with Commercial-Equestrian-zoned properties in red cross-hatch and approximate location of subject property indicated by arrow (source: City of Glendale).

N Assumed
N
N Assumed
N
467 of 561

Attachment 1: Current Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Map 9: Current map of Griffith Park, with trails shown in orange and subject property indicated by arrow (source:

City of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation) Map 10: Crop of previous, current map of Griffith Park zoomed in on area of subject property (source: City of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation) 468 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Map 2: Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, subject property outlined in red (1965) Historic Map 1: Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, subject property outlined in red (1951) A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
North North
469 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Map 3: Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, area surrounding subject property, with subject property outlined in red (1950) North
470 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Map 4: Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, crop of previous showing Glendale Commercial-Equestrian-zoned properties in red (1950)
N Assumed
N
471 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Aerial 2: Crop of previous, subject property indicated by arrow, prior to development with existing buildings (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1936)
Historic Aerial 1: Subject property indicated by arrow, prior to development with existing buildings, view northwest (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1936)
472 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Aerial 4: Crop of previous, subject property indicated by arrow, prior to development with existing buildings (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1937)
Historic Aerial 3: Subject property indicated by arrow, prior to development with existing buildings, view north (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1937)
473 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Aerial 6: Crop of previous, approximate area of subject property indicated by arrow, prior to development with existing buildings, after LA River flood (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1938) Historic Aerial 5: Approximate area of subject property indicated by arrow, prior to development with existing build- ings, after LA River flood, view northwest (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1938) 474 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Aerial 8: Crop of previous, subject property indicated by arrow, showing existing buildings (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1946)
Historic Aerial 7: Subject property indicated by arrow, showing existing buildings, view northwest (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1946)
475 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Aerial 10: Crop of previous, 1947, subject property indicated by arrow, showing existing buildings (source:

UCLA Air Photo Archive)
Historic Aerial 9: Subject property indicated by arrow, showing existing buildings, view southeast (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1946)
476 of 561

Attachment 2: Historic Maps and Aerials
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Historic Aerial 12: Crop of previous, subject property indicated by arrow, showing existing buildings (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1953)
Historic Aerial 11: Subject property indicated by arrow, showing existing buildings, view south (source: UCLA Air Photo Archive, 1953)
477 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 1: Silver Spur Stables, Building A (House), north elevation (right) and east eleva- tion (left), view southwest (Snow, 2018)
Figure 2: Silver Spur Stables, Building A (House), east elevation, view southwest (Snow, 2018)
478 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 3: Silver Spur Stables, Building A (House), north elevation, view southeast (Snow, 2018)
Figure 4: Silver Spur Stables, Building A (House), west elevation, view east (Snow, 2018) 479 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 5: Silver Spur Stables, Building A (House), west elevation (left) and south elevation (right), view northeast (Snow, 2018)
480 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 6: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), primary north eleva- tion, view southeast (Snow, 2018)
Figure 7: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), detail of west elevation, view east (Snow, 2018)
481 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 9: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), south elevation, view northwest (Snow, 2018)
Figure 8: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), south side of west ele- vation, view southeast (Snow, 2018)
482 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 10: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), east elevation, view northwest (Snow, 2018)
Figure 11: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), east elevation, view northwest (Snow, 2018)
483 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 12: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior, central corri- dor, view south (Snow, 2018)
Figure 13: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior, central corri- dor, view south (Snow, 2018)
484 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 14: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior, door to bath- room, view east (Snow, 2018)
Figure 15: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior (Snow, 2018) 485 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 16: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior (Snow, 2018) Figure 17: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior (Snow, 2018) 486 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 18: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior, view west (Snow, 2018)
Figure 19: Silver Spur Stables, Building B (Office and Main Stable), interior (Snow, 2018) 487 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 20: Silver Spur Stables, Building C (East Stable), west elevation, view east (Snow, 2018)
Figure 21: Silver Spur Stables, Building C (East Stable), west elevation, view northeast (Snow, 2018)
488 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 22: Silver Spur Stables, Building C (East Stable), east elevation, view northwest (Snow, 2018)
489 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 23: Silver Spur Stables, Building D (Barn), east elevation, view northwest (Snow, 2018)
Figure 24: Silver Spur Stables, Building D (Barn), south elevation, view northwest (Snow, 2018)
490 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 25: Silver Spur Stables, Building D (Barn), east elevation of barn and stables, view southwest (Snow, 2018)
Figure 26: Silver Spur Stables, Building D (Barn), north elevation of stables, view south- west (Snow, 2018)
491 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 27: Silver Spur Stables, Building D (Barn), interior, view west (Snow, 2018) Figure 28: Silver Spur Stables, Building D (Barn), stable view west (Snow, 2018) 492 of 561

Attachment 3: Current Photographs of Subject Property
Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 29: Silver Spur Stables, Building E (Arena), view north (Snow, 2018) Figure 30: Silver Spur Stables, Building E (Arena), view southwest (Snow, 2018) 493 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 31: Allen Avenue, with subject property at right and adjacent property (1850 River- side Drive, Glendale, LA Horse Rentals) at left, view south (Snow, 2018) Figure 32: 1850 Riverside Drive, Glendale (LA Horse Rentals, located adjacent to subject property), view south (Snow, 2018)
494 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 33: 1840 Riverside Drive (Trickee Tack feed store), view southwest (Snow, 2018) Figure 34: 1830 Riverside Drive (Triple R Stables), view southwest (Snow, 2018) 495 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 35: 400 Riverside Drive (condos with stables), view southeast (Snow, 2018) 496 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 36: Bridle trail located southeast of subject property, with LA River at right, view east (Snow, 2018)
Figure 37: Bridle trail located southeast of subject property, view north, with Bette Davis Estate in background ( Snow, 2018)
497 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 38: Swinging Bridge, located southwest of subject property, provides passage from bridle trails over the LA River and into Griffith Park, view south (Snow, 2018) Figure 39: Swinging Bridge, located southwest of subject property, provides passage from bridle trails over the LA River and into Griffith Park, view northeast (Snow, 2018) 498 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 40: Tunnel under 5-Freeway, located southwest of subject property, provides pas- sage from bridle trails into Griffith Park, view southeast (Snow, 2018) Figure 41: Bridle trail leading along Zoo Drive into Griffith Park (Snow, 2018) 499 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 42: Bridle trail in Griffith Park (Snow, 2018)
500 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 43: Current aerial, view southeast, with bridges to bridle trails indicated (source: Emily Gabel-Luddy, 2018) Easter Field Bridge
Irving Avenue Bridge
Allen Avenue Bridge
Figure 44: Current aerial, view southeast, Easter Field Bridge at center (source: Emily Gabel-Luddy, 2018) Silver Spur Stables
501 of 561

Attachment 4: Current Photographs of Setting

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Figure 45: Current aerial, view northeast, Irving Avenue Bridge at center (source: Emily Gabel-Luddy, 2018) Figure 46: Current aerial, view northwest, Allen Avenue Bridge at center (source: Emily Gabel-Luddy, 2018) 502 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Attachment 5: Historic Photographs of Setting

Figure A: Early view of Riverside Riding Stable, 3129 Riverside Drive, not extant (source: Page Williams, n.d.)
Figure B: Early view of Park View Riding Academy, Glendale, not extant (source: Page Williams, n.d.)
503 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Attachment 5: Historic Photographs of Setting

Figure D: Rocking Horse Stables, 470 Riverside Drive, not extant (source: Page Williams, c. 1950s)
Figure C: Early view of Royal Riding Academy, Riverside Drive, not extant (source: Page Williams, n.d.)
504 of 561

Silver Spur Stables, 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, CA Attachment 5: Historic Photographs of Setting

Figure E: Actors on horseback training in Griffith Park in area that is now the Los Angeles Eques- trian Center (source: Page Williams, 1966)
505 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 1 Historical Assessment of Silver Spur Stables 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, California:

The oldest surviving and active 1930 “Pole Barn” characteristic of barns post Great Depression, and in 1939 as a result of World War II in the United States James M. DeCarli, PhD, MPH, MPA, MCHES, CPST
Pro Consumer Safety/Public Health Behaviour Solutions
September 8, 2021
Author Note
James M. DeCarli https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-7756 The author declares that there is no conflict of interest. The research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Correspondence concerning this report should be addressed to James M. DeCarli, 744 So.

Windsor Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90005, United States Email: [email protected] Exhibit 11
506 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 2

Silver Spur Stables
A 1939 Pole Barn, the oldest, existing and active horse barn and stable in Glendale along the Los Angeles
River, and plays a vital role in the Riverside Rancho
horse community.
507 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Purpose and Qualification 4
II. Designation Criteria Overview 5
III. Location and Setting 7
IV. Criteria for Eligibility 8
a. Criterion 1 8
i. Historical Rancho La Providencia 1894 Mapping 8 ii. The Great Flood of 1938 8
iii. The Pole Barn, 1900 Riverside Drive: 1930 characteristics 10 iv. Comparing Pole Barn Design Characteristics to the “Old Barn” 12 v. Silver Spur Stable’s continued role local and regional history 12 b. Criterion 2 14
c. Criterion 3 16
d. Criterion 4 17
V. Conclusion 17
Table 1: Barns and stables in the Riverside Rancho by year built 18 Exhibit A: Silver Spur Stables blueprints and site plan 19 Exhibit B-1: Silver Spur Stables an active barn since 1939 20 Exhibit B-2: Silver Spur Stables an active barn since 1939 21 Exhibit C: Arial photograph of 1900 Riverside Drive Great Flood of 1938 22 Exhibit D: Map-stone creek and vicinity Silver Spur Stables 23 Exhibit E: Current map of ranchos 24
Exhibit F, Plate 1: Example 1930 American pole barn (round posts) 25 Exhibit F, Plate 2: Example 1930 American pole barn (post spacing) 26 Exhibit F, Plate 3: Example 1930 American pole barn (rafter, sheathing) 27 Exhibit F, Plate 4: Silver Spur Old Barn (rafter sheathing comparison) 28 Exhibit F, Plate 5: Silver Spur Old Barn (roof pitch comparison) 29 Exhibit G: Bette Davis and Arthur Farnsworth (1941), Silver Spur Stable 30 Exhibit H: Stefani Powers on the cover of Life After 50 31 Exhibit I: Stefani Powers with Susanne Peika (barn manager and polo friend) 32 Exhibit J: Bella Hadid in Vogue Magazine video interview at Silver Spur Stables 33 Exhibit K: Bella Hadid riding on Coco at Silver Spur Stables 34 Exhibit L: Kendal Jenner in Vogue Magazine on horse Coco at Silver Spur Stables 35 Exhibit M, Plate 1: Silver Spur Stables, Central barn, exterior front, interior 36 Exhibit M, Plate 2: Silver Spur Stables, Central barn, living room 37 Exhibit M, Plate 3: Silver Spur Stables, central barn, interior 38 Exhibit M, Plate 4: Silver Spur Stables, Central barn, restrooms, office 39 Exhibit M, Plate 5: Silver Spur Stables, Central barn, kitchen 40 Exhibit N, Plate 1: USGS 1894 Rancho Providencia Map 1900 Riverside Drive 41 Exhibit N, Plate 2: USGS 1894 Rancho Providencia overlay 1900 Riverside Drive 42 Exhibit N, Plate 3: USGS 1894 Rancho Providencia overlay 1900 Riverside Drive 43 References 44
508 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 4

I. Purpose and Qualification
Purpose
The aim of this paper is to provide a historical basis for Silver Spur Stables, located at 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, California in the Riverside Rancho. The purpose is to provide the Glendale Historical Society with sufficient historical background and references to provide a basis for historical designation of the “old barn” and related structures at Silver Spur Stables.

A NOTE TO THIS ASSESSMENT (added September 19, 2021). It must be noted that, a fter the completion of this assessment and submitting it to the Glendale Historical Society, the author was informed that th e historical society learned that there was a historical as sessment in 2018. On September 19, 2021 the author was provided a copy of t he 2018 assessment , whereas Historic Preservation Consulting, found Silver Spur Stables at 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, California, as historic (Snow, 2018). This current assessment provides additiona l historical perspectives as described in each of the criteria for historic designation, that should also be taken into consideration for designation. It must be further noted that , while not part of this 2021 historical assessment, a 2019-2020 study by California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, College of Environmental Design, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, conducted a study with Save Glendale Riverside Rancho, recommended a historic al overlay for the Riverside Rancho, whereas the application process is currently being planned.

Qualification
While the author’s doctoral and graduate school education is in applied sciences and public health, he has college and graduate edu cation in Urban and Regional Planning from California State Polytechnic University with specialization in h istoric preservation , Public Administration/Intergovernmental Management Policy from the University of Southern 509 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 5

California, and Architectural Historic Preservation from Mansfield College, University of Oxford.

He was also a fellow at the National Trust for Historic Preservation in Washington DC. He maintains relationships with alumni networks and is active with consultancy in historic preservation in the United Kingdom and in the United States.

II. Designation Criteria Overview

1. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. a. Silver Spur Stables “old barn” is an example of a broad pattern of United States history, characteristic of barns constructed during the 1930’s of the Great Depression and World War II in 1939
b. Silver Spur Stables, including the “old barn”, continues operating as an active horse barn, since 1939
c. Silver Spur Stables has contributed to local and regional history providing western culture by providing the community with a long history of riding lessons, children’s riding camps and at-risk youth equine-assisted therapy programs and riding club d. Silver Spur Stables continues to be a host as an emergency equine and animal rescue center during fires and earthquakes

2. Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history. a. Silver Spur Stables is associated with the lives of actors and performers in the film industry as equestrians in Los Angeles and Hollywood, dating back to the 1930’s to the present. b. Silver Spur Stables has been the home to a long history of film and entertainment horses c. Silver Spur Stables has had a long hi story contributing to the fashion industry, since the early days of Bette Davis in the 1930’s.
510 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 6

3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values a. The old barn has characteristic of pole barn construction that was common during the 1930’s that is representative of the design of barns constructed during World War II in 1939
b. The central barn, office, living room, and stables are characteristic of 1939 construction during that time period

4. Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation
a. The Silver Spur Stables “old barn” yields a pattern of cultural heritage in California, as part of the original 1894 Rancho La Providencia that was dedicated to host cattle and horses b. To date, Silver Spur Stables, including the “old barn”, continues to operate as a horse barn and facility
c. Horses have been on the land of 1900 Riverside Drives, continually since 1894, for 187 years

511 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 7

III. Location and Setting
Located in the Riverside Rancho, Silver Spur Stables, located at 1900 Riverside Drive, is an active, community horse barn and stable facility that includes a Pole barn build in 1939 with 78 horse stables. The facility includes several buildings, including two tack rooms, staging area, horse cleaning, arena, offices, barn living room, barn kitchen, a one -bedroom home, and outdoor barbeque facility (Exhibit A). Records show “old barn” in the rear of the property adjacent to the stone creek was built in 1939, with front b uildings following. The property is located within the Commercial Equestrian (CE) zone, which allows equestrian-related business activities. It is part of the larger Riverside Ra ncho horse community. The property, is located within, what was the original 1894 Rancho La Providencia. Silver Spur Stables, includin g the old barn continues to be an active horse barn and stable (Exhibit B, 1-2). As shown in the map below, the property facing Riverside Drive to the north; Allen Avenue to the east; the historic stone creek, the public bridle trail and the Los Angeles Equestrian Center to its sout h; and the City of Burbank to its westerly side. Silver Spur Stables plays an active role supporting and contributing to the Glendale Riverside Rancho, as well as neighboring rancho communities and Los Angeles Griffith Park (Save Glendale Riverside Rancho, 2018).

Commercial Equestrian Zone Map – Riverside Rancho
512 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 8

IV. Criteria For Eligibility
The criteria for eligibility for this document was based on the National Register (Title 36 Code of Federal Regulations Part 60.4). Whereas the property in question must be at least 50 years of age; significant in American history and culture, architecture, or archaeology; and meet one or more of the four of the following criteria.

CRITERION 1: ASSOCIATED WITH EVENTS THAT HAVE MADE A SIGNIFICANT

CONTRIBUTION TO THE BROAD PATTERNS OF LOCAL OR REGIONAL

HISTORY OR THE CULTURAL HERITAGE OF CALIFORNIA OR THE UNITED STATES
Historical Rancho La Providencia 1894 Mapping
The address 1900 Riverside Drive, Glendale, California is located on the southwestern most corner of the current City of Glendale, adjacent to the City of Burbank and City of Los Angeles at Griffith Park. Using overlay mapping technology, the current property address, overlayed on an 1894 USGS map is within Rancho La Providencia, when overlayed onto a 1926 map, usin g USGS mapping overlay (United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2021). This is notable, as a portion of the current Riverside Rancho was part of the original Rancho La Providencia. This land was originally designated by a land grant in 1849 for cattle and horses. While many other areas of the original Rancho La Providencia have vacated horses, since that time, horses have continually on this land for 187 years in the Burbank Rancho Equestrian District and the Glendale Riverside Rancho (Ogden Hoffman & Hubert, 1862; Bearchell & Fried, 1989; United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2021; Brief History of Vicente De La Ossa and Family, n.d.).

The Great Flood of 1938
Flood events along the Los Angeles River between the years of 1914 and 1934, left Los Angeles economically devastated (US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District , 2013). As a result, the Flood Control Act of 1936 was established by the Federal Government which provided funds 513 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 9

to assist the County of Los Angeles in the development of flood control infrastructure that included channeling 52 miles of the Los Angeles R iver. Construction began in 1936 and lasted through 1959 (US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, n.d.). The flood of 1936, breached the Los Angeles River within this area of the Riverside Rancho during its construction period.

During the Great Flood of 1938, the Los Angeles River breached, causing flooding throughout southern California, including south the Riverside Rancho (35 Black and White Photos of the 1938 Los Angeles Flood, 1938). According to an arial photograph shows the flooded area along the Los Angeles River by Victory Boulevard and Riverside Drive. Comparing the photograph with a Google Earth map overlay, shows the approximate location of 1900 Riverside Drive (United States. Army. Corps of Engineers, 1938). The comparison suggests th at this location might have been spared, but looked like there might not have been structures, or it could be in the adjacent area that might have been flooded (Exhibit C). In either case, in 1938 it shows no structures at the property location of 1900 Riverside Drive. Chicago Title historical property data shows only two properties within this portion of the Riverside Rancho in 1938. This included Bette Davis Estate located at 1907 Rancho Avenue, build in 1934 and another property located at 1752 Riverside Drive, built in 1941.

514 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 10

The Pole Barn at 1900 Riverside Drive: Its history and characteristics in the United States during the 1930’s
It is the oldest barn among the other 4 neighboring barns and stables in the Commercial Equestrian Zone in the
Riverside Rancho (Table 1). What is known as the oldest building on the property, is referred to as the “old barn”. It is located on the back par t of the property with its side adjacent and parallel with the stone creek (Exhibit D) and community bridle trail that the rancho community
equestrians of Glendale Riverside Rancho, Burbank
Rancho, horse rental facilities and other riding stables programs and the Los Angeles Equestrian Center, use to
access the 55-miles of riding trails wi thin the 4,210 acres of natural chapparal -covered mountain terrain of Griffith Park in Los Angeles (Exhibit E). At some point in time, a front roof cover and extension was added to the front of the old barn. This has provided protection from environmental elements. The old barn, is the oldest surviving and active American-made pole barn, characteristic of barns built in 1939 during World War II.

The name “pole barn”, evolved in the 1930’s in America as a result of economic pressures of the Great Depression that forced farmers in rural communities to use recycled utility poles as building materials (Vlach, 2021). H. Howard Doane, founder of Doane’s Agricultural Service, developed the pole barn concept in 1930, combining the availability of utility poles and metal roof sheeting.

This method of construction with reinforced wood trusses with metal or wood that made pole barns stronger, while having the ability to be built larger and taller using less materials (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2017).
515 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 11

At the time when the “old barn” was constructed in 1939, was during World War II, when the United States government imposed a $1,500 limit for constructing new barns (Delmarva Buildings, n.d.). The pole barn became more common throughout the United States during this time period.

Its unique design, reduced the amount of lumber needed by two -thirds, meeting governmental restrictions during the war. Pole barns were constructed primarily from utility poles or natural shaped or round wooded timber between 4 to 12 inches in diameter. These posts also included tree trunks, engineered lumber or chemically pressure treated squared timbers. Posts were buried into the ground or anchored to concrete, reducing the need for additional bracing. Posts were generally spaced 8 to 12 fe et apart (Stalnaker, 2021). Pole barns did not require walls. Those that were enclosed had posts about 2 feet on center to provide for siding. Siding generally ranged from 32 - or 26-inches galvanized steel siding, lap siding, cedar boards or brick. The pole barn was common to a have a smaller pitch roof, constructed with rafters every 2 feet, with 1 inch of sheathing placed 12- to 18- inches apart. The shape included a gable or lean-to, with metal roofing or whatever was the least expensive or available mat erial. The floors were generally soil, and sometimes gravel, concrete or wood framed (Ontario Architecture, n.d.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2017).

516 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 12

Comparing Pole Barn Design Characteristics to the “Old Barn” at 1900 Riverside Drive The Silver Spur Stables “old barn” has
characteristics of the American pole barn
that was representative of what was
common in the United States during the
Great Depression and World War II.

These images of a 1930 pole barn for
cattle, and farm equipment outbuilding
pole barn, illustrate the height, low pitch
roof and material, siding, pole, and design
are observed from the exterior of Silver
Spur Stables old barn. See Exhibit F,
Plates 1-5, for larger photographs of 1930
American pole barn examples and Si lver
Spur Stables “old barn”.

Silver Spur Stable’s continued role providing western culture to local and regional history Since the beginning, in 1939 when Silver Spur Stables began as a horse barn and stables, it continues as an active horse barn, serving the community of Glendale and the greater Los Angeles.

It continues providing western culture by providing traditional riding lessons, in additional to children’s riding camps that provide not only riding lessons, but also horsemanship and care, and exposing children to western culture, affiliated with The Autry Museum. Child campers range 517 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 13

from local to as far as Malibu and Orange County, by participating in horse camps throughout the summer, and between school breaks in the fall, winter and spring. Silv er Spur Stables has had a long history of providing western culture with horses by providing programs for at-risk youth with the Los Angeles Police Department, Operation Progress. Many of these children from the community of Watts in Los Angeles who have g raduated from the Operation Progress programs for grades K-12, have attended Boston College, studied abroad, and competed nationally for various competitions. Silver Spur Stables continues to recruit a long history of equestrian participants to the Silver Spur Riding Club. The western horse culture goes beyond Silver Spur Stables, with 184 barns and stable facilities within the greater Los Angeles and 44 within the City of Los Angeles, that include over 150,000 horses, with 400,000 horses within southern California (Save Glendale Riverside Rancho, 2021). Silver Spur Stables, continues to operate as an emergency horse and animal rescue center. Most recently from victims of wildfires in Malibu, Topanga, Pacific Palisades, and other burn areas along the foothil ls that have horses and animals (KCRW, 2019).

518 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 14

CRITERION 2: ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIVES OF PERSONS IMPORTANT TO

LOCAL, CALIFORNIA OR NATIONAL HISTORY
Silver Spur Stables is associated with the lives of people who have visited and who are or have been equestrians at Silver Spur Stables who are notable to local, California and National history.

Equestrians in the film industry

Silver Spur Stables has h ad a long history of having actors and performers in the film and music industry, visiting, boarding their horses and those how have become part of Silver Spur Stables and Silver Spur Riding club. This relationship with the film industry, began during its early days with Bette Davis. She and her husband Arthur Farnsworth resided at her Rivergate Estate that was built in 1934. It was located at 1705 Rancho Avenue, just a short ride down the trail in the Riverside Rancho. According to a longtime resident of G lendale, who grew up in the area, Gloria Genie, recalled as a teen, seeing Bette Davis many times riding on the trail with her Trotting horse “Tom” throughout the Riverside Rancho, as well as by the new and only barn at the time, Silver Spur Stables (Exhibit G). Since that time, Silver Spur Stables has continued being affiliated with equestrians in the film industry. Susanne Peika, the current barn manager for over 20 years, has had a long history in the equestrian community. Beginning with the early days o f beginning the University of Southern California Polo Team and Club, to teaching and participating with polo matches and teams at the Los Angeles Equestrian Center. She carries a wealth of knowledge associating Silver Spur Stables with Hollywood and the f ilm industry. Whereas, Johnny Grant, former Honorary Mayor of Hollywood, a common visitor, recalled that when Michael Jackson was a boy that he often visited to ride at Silver Spur Stables. More recently equestrian visitors and boarders include, William Sh atner, Stefani Powers (equestrian and boarder), and Adam Sandler.

Stefani Powers has been a regular at Silver Spur Stables, including being featured with her horse at Silver Spur Stables (Exhibit H & I). To this day, Silver Spur Stables provides annual awa rds 519 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 15

barbeques and holiday events, inviting members from its Silver Spur Riding Club, inner -city, at- risk though programs, and children’s riding camps and programs. These were often attended by many in the film and music industry with these equestrians also performing casually at these events and activities. Most recently was Austin Moody, an equestrian and Country music writer and performer from Nashville, Tennessee.

In addition, to Hollywood film stars, and other performers, Silver Spur Stables has also been featured on the cover of magazines with Stefani Powers (Exhibit H) and others in Vogue Magazine.

While the Riverside Rancho filled with history with Vogue Magazine with Bette Davis, Silver Spur Stables continues being on the cover of Vogue Magazine a nd videography. Recently these included Bella Hadid, as well as video interviews with horse Coco throughout Silver Spur Stables (Exhibit J & K). Vogue Magazine at Silver Spur Stables has also included Kendal Jenner with the horse Coco (Exhibit K). Silver Spur Stables is also home to many longtime film and entertainment horses such as Coco, who has been in Vogue Magazine several times.

520 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 16

CRITERION 3: EMBODIES THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TYPE,

PERIOD, REGION OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTIONS OR REPRESENTS THE

WORK OF A MASTER OR POSSESSES HIGH ARTISTIC VALUES

Silver Spur Stables embodies distinctive characteristics of a type of barn (pole barn) that was common during the 1939 period of construction. As shown in Exhibit E, Plates 4 and 5, shows the old barn at Silver Spur Stables, characteristic of pole barn construction that was common during the 1930’s. It is representative of the barns constructed during World War II in 1939 in the United States as a result of the U.S. government restrictions on barn construction, which reduced the amount of lumber needed by two -thirds, to meet restrictions during World War II. (Delmarva Buildings, n.d.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2017). In addition to being characteristic of this time period, it continues an active barn in the community.

Silver Spur Stables also has other buildings and aesthetics that are characteristic of the time period.

Most specifically is the central barn, seen from Riverside Drive . It includes the central stables, office, restrooms , k itchen, and living room, that are characteristic of 1939 materials and construction (Exhibit M).

521 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 17

CRITERION 4: HAS YIELDED, OR HAS THE POTENTIAL TO YIELD,

INFORMATION IMPORTANT TO THE PREHISTORY OR HISTORY OF THE LOCAL

AREA, CALIFORNIA OR THE NATION

Silver Spur Stables yields information important to the history of the local area, as well as the nation. The Silver Spur Stables, its structures, including the “old barn”, yields a pattern of cultural heritage in California, as part of the original 1894 Rancho La Providencia that was dedicated to host cattle and horses. To date, Silver Spur Stables, the oldest and original active pole barn in the United States, continues to operate as a horse barn and facility. Its location, the land of 1900 Riverside Drive, has had horses in this area of the Riverside Rancho, continually for 187 years, since 1984, as shown in Exhibit N, Plates 1-3 (Save Glendale Riverside Rancho, 2018a).

V. Conclusion
This historical assessment of Silver Spur Stables, located at 1900 Riverside Drive in Glendale, California, is found to have historical significance, as discussed in each of the four criteria for historical designation. The 2018 assessment should also be included upon designation by the City of Glendale. This designation will also contribute to the planning of the historical overlay of the Riverside Rancho.

522 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 18

Table 1
Barns and stables in the Riverside Rancho by year built (Reference: Chicago Title Company)

Barn/Stable Name Address Year Built
Silver Spur Stables 1900 Riverside Drive 1939
Griffith Park Horse Rentals 1820 Riverside Drive 1940
Whispering Willow 110 Irving Avenue 1940
LA Horse Rentals and Stables 1840 Riverside Drive 1943 Triple R Stables 1830 Riverside Drive 1973

523 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 19

Exhibit A
Silver Spur Stables blueprints and site plan

524 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 20

Exhibit B-1
Silver Spur Stables an active barn and stable serving greater Los Angeles County since 1939

Silver Spur Stables
Established 1939
The first and longest lasting
community barn and stable in the
Riverside Rancho. It is a 78-stall
horse stable, that provides lessons,
children’s riding camps, annual events
and activities, programs for at-risk
youth equine therapy, boarding for
film industry horses, the Silver Spur
Riding club, and community
barbeques adjacent to the stone creek.

525 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 21

Exhibit B-2
Silver Spur Stables an active barn and stable serving greater Los Angeles County since 1939

526 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 22

Exhibit C
Arial photograph of 1900 Riverside Drive location of the Great Flood of 1938

527 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 23

Exhibit D
Map of the stone creek and vicinity within the Riverside Rancho and Silver Spur Stables

528 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 24

Exhibit E
Current Map of Ranchos: Location of Silver Spur Stables within the Riverside Rancho, and neighboring rancho communities of the Burbank Rancho, Los Angeles Atwater Equestrian District, and Los Angeles Equestrian Center, that share Griffith Park trails

529 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 25

Exhibit F (Plate 1)
Example of a 1930 American pole barn with round posts on concrete footing Source: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/35/d4/e4/35d4e48e773f3ce5ad1138d0e9d43b77.jpg

530 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 26

Exhibit F (Plate 2)
Example of a 1930 American pole barn with round posts illustrating design of posts between 8 to 12 feet apart and, rafters and sheathing
Source: https://www.publicdomainpictures.net/en/view-image.php?image=210581&picture=rustic-barn

531 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 27

Exhibit F (Plate 3)
Example of a 1930 American pole barn with round posts illustrating common spacing of rafters about 2 feet apart with 1 inch sheathing, about 12 inches apart.

Source: https://kbpconstructionplus.com/faqs/metal-building-vs-pole-barn/

532 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 28

Exhibit F (Plate 4)
Shown: Silver Spur Stables old barn. Illustrating common spacing of rafters about 2 feet apart with 1 inch sheathing, about 12+ inches apart.

Photo: Jim DeCarli

533 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 29

Exhibit F (Plate 5)
Shown: Silver Spur Stables old barn front entry view. Illustrating common spacing of rafters about 2 feet apart with 1 inch sheathing, about 12+ inches apart seen inside. Common siding, roof pitch and design is also observed.

Photo: Jim DeCarli

534 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 30

Exhibit G
Bette Davis and husband Arthur Farnsworth with Trotting horse “Mike” at Silver Spur Stables

535 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 31

Exhibit H
Shown: Stefani Powers on the cover of Life After 50. Taken with her horse at Silver Spur Stables (Photo: Taken from framed photo on the wall at Silver Spur Stables

536 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 32

Exhibit I
Shown: Stefani Powers with Susanne Peika (barn manager and polo friend) at Silver Spur Stables (Photo: Take at a social event in 2021 at Silver Spur Stables

537 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 33

Exhibit J
Shown: Bella Hadid in Vogue Magazine video interview at Silver Spur Stables [https://www.vogue.com/video/watch/73-questions-with-bella-hadid]

538 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 34

Exhibit K
Shown: Bella Hadid riding on Coco at Silver Spur Stables

539 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 35

Exhibit L
Shown: Kendal Jenner in Vogue Magazine on horse Coco at Silver Spur Stables

540 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 36

Exhibit M. Plate 1.

Shown: Silver Spur Stables, central barn, front, interior, 1900 Riverside Drive

541 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 37

Exhibit M. Plate 2.

Shown: Silver Spur Stables, central barn, living room, 1900 Riverside Drive

542 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 38

Exhibit M. Plate 3.

Shown: Silver Spur Stables, central barn, 1900 Riverside Drive

543 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 39

Exhibit M. Plate 4.

Shown: Silver Spur Stables, central barn, restrooms, office, 1900 Riverside Drive

544 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 40

Exhibit M. Plate 5.

Shown: Silver Spur Stables, central barn, 1900 Riverside Drive

545 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 41

Exhibit N. Plate 1
Shown: USGS 1894 Rancho Providencia map showing the location of 1900 Riverside Drive

546 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 42

Exhibit N. Plate 2
Shown: USGS 1894 Rancho Providencia map with 1926 overlay of current 1900 Riverside Drive

547 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 43

Exhibit N. Plate 3
Shown: USGS 1894 Rancho Providencia map with 1926 overlay of current 1900 Riverside Drive

548 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 44

References

35 Black and White Photos of the 1938 Los Angeles Flood . (1938). Vintage Everyday. https://www.vintag.es/2014/12/35-black-and-white-photos-of-1938-los.html

36 CFR § 60.4 - Criteria for evaluation. | CFR | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu) Any Place America. (n.d.). Los Angeles County, California Topo Maps & Elevations . Retrieved September 8, 2021, from https://www.anyplaceamerica.com/directory/ca/los -angeles- county-06037/

Bearchell, C. A., & Fried, L. D. (1989). San Fernando Valley: Then and Now: An Illustrated History (1st ed.). Windsor Pubns.

Brief History of Vicente De La Ossa and Family. (n.d.). Historical Parks. Retrieved September 6, 2021, from https://historicparks.org/documents/DeLaOssaHistory.pdf

Delmarva Buildings. (n.d.). A Brief History of Pole Buildings – I Love Pole Buildings Blog. I Love Pole Buildings. Retrieved September 7, 2021, from
https://blog.ilovepolebuildings.com/a-brief-history-of-pole-buildings/

KCRW. (2019, March 7). Silver Spur Stables.
https://www.kcrw.com/culture/shows/soundsla/silver-spur-stables

Ogden Hoffman, & Hubert, N. (1862). Reports of land cases: Determined in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. By Ogden Hoffman, District Judge. Reported by Numa Hubert. N. Hubert. Reprinted.

Ontario Architecture. (n.d.). Building Types - Barns. Retrieved July 1, 2021, from http://ontarioarchitecture.com/barn.htm

Save Glendale Riverside Rancho. (2018). Save Glendale Riverside Rancho Community Website.

Save Glendale Riverside Rancho Community Website.
https://saveglendaleriversiderancho.com/

Save Glendale Riverside Rancho. (2018a). History of the Glendale Riverside Rancho. http://saveglendaleriversiderancho.com/history

Save Glendale Riverside Rancho. (2021). Economic Impact Report for the Proposed and Revitalized Los Angeles Equestrian Park and Event Center (LAEPEC).

Snow, J. (2018, August). Historic Resource Assessment. Historic Preservation Consulting.

Stalnaker, J. (2021). Structural Design in Wood (VNR Structural Engineering Series) (2nd Edition). Springer.

549 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 45

United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Engineer Office. (1938, March 3). Los Angeles River - flood of 1938 aerial view above Victory Blvd . Dig ital-Library.Csun.Edu. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Los_Angeles_River_- _flood_of_1938_aerial_view_above_Victory_Blvd_(SPCOL20).jpg

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. (n.d.). Los Angeles River. US Army Corps of Engineers. Retrieved September 8, 2021, from
https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Missions/Asset-Management/Los-Angeles-River/

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. (2013, October 3). The LA River and the Corps: A brief history. US Army Corps of Engineers.
https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Stories/Article/477249/the-la-river-and-the- corps-a-brief-history/

U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2011). The Encyclopedia of Wood . New York: Skyhorse Publishing, Inc., 2011. 16-4 to 16-6. Print

United States Geological Survey (USGS). (2021, September 6). USGS. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/34.1570/-118.3216

Vlach, J. M. (2021). Barns (Library of Congress Visual Sourcebooks) by John Michael Vlach (2003–04-17). W. W. Norton & Company.

550 of 561

SILVER SPUR STABLES 1900 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, GLENDALE, CA HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 46

THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIALLY LEFT BLANK

551 of 561

MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____ D_e_v _in_e ______ , seconded by Council Member ______ A_s_a_t�ry_a _ n____ , that upon review and consideration of all documents, testimony, materials and exhibits relative to Appeal Case No. PAPP- 000522-2022 - appeal of the Director of Community Development's determination related to Design Review Case No. PDR-000210-2022 and Environmental Information Form Case No. PEIF-000280-2022, that the preparation of an EIR is required to review and assess the proposed project, because such proposed project will result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource as defined by CEQA such that preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required, and after having conducted and closed a public hearing on said determination, the Council hereby REVERSES said determination based on all of the evidence in the record, including all of the appellant's and appellant's witnesses' arguments and testimony at the hearing, the appellant's appeal, as well as the Historical Resource Evaluation that was prepared and submitted by Sapphos Environmental Inc.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Devine, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None CITY ORNEY
DATE J h� /23
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF:

TUESDAY, MARCH 7, 2023.
9A
Exhibit 12
552 of 561

INTERDEPARTMENT

AL COMMUNICATION
TO
: Roubik Golanian, City Manager
From: Bradley Calvert, AICP; Assistant Director of Community Development Date: July 14, 2022
SUBJECT: Kennels as Permitted Use in the Commercial Equestrian Zone Recently, co
mmunication has been provided to Council regarding concerns over kennels being an allowed use within the Commercial Equestrian zone in the Riverside Rancho neighborhood.

This concern has largely been focused on potential conflicts between horses and canines, and in response to a potential project under consideration that would provide a kennel and a stable.

Currently, the Commercial Equestrian zone (CE) allows for both kennels and stables as a permitted use, with no specific conditions. The zoning code, focused on land use compatibility, does not have a provision for the separation of particular animals, but rather regulates uses regarding animals. In this case, it would be the discussion on separating horses and canines.

From a purely zoning perspective, the use of kennels and stables are able to coexist within the CE zone.

Some residents of the Riverside Rancho neighborhood have raised concerns whether canines and horses can coexist, particularly as it relates to safety. Their concerns are the activity of dogs, or the potential of dogs escaping kennels, could pose a danger and risk to horses and riders within the neighborhood. While the zoning code does not focus on the specific separation of uses as it pertains to these animals, both kennels and stables are governed by the same rules and requirements, when allowed. The City relies upon the ability to regulate these uses through its permit process. If a kennel, or stable, proves to be a nuisance, whether that be from sound, animal care and monitoring, or if a facility poses a menace (public peace, comfort and welfare, etc.) the permit can be revoked following written notice and inspection. These rules apply to both stables and kennels.

This regulatory measure allows for the City to terminate the right to have either allowable used based on the performance and safety of each facility. For example, if there are frequent issues of canines escaping the kennel facility, the City would have the right to intervene and potentially revoke the permit for not following the rules and regulations that are applicable to a kennel facility.

Exhibit 13
553 of 561

Council does have the option to modify the allowable uses within the CE zone, including removing kennels as a permitted use. It should be noted that the code does not discern between kennels for dogs and cats. If kennels are removed as a permitted use, this would also prohibit the ability for someone to operate a cat kennel within the CE zone. The definition of kennel covers both animals, and any changes to allowing kennels would affect both.

Staff suggest maintaining kennels as an allowable use in the CE zone, as this would impact the ability for any form of kennel, regardless of animal to operate in the neighborhood. The City can depend on its ability to revoke the permit if the performance of the kennel does not satisfy City requirements regarding safety and nuisance.

Bradley Calvert, AICP
Assistant Director of Community Development
554 of 561

3/10/2023    Page 1 of 2
City of Glendale  Community Development Dept., Planning Division  633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103  Glendale, CA  91206  818.548.2140  www.glendaleca.gov/CDD

Case No. ________________
Date ____________________
Submit this form on the Glendale Permits site at www.glendaleca.gov/permits (Appeal of Planning Decision) For mo
re information about this form and related fees, please call the Planning Division at (818) 548‐2115.

Please co mplete  (PRINT or TYPE) the following information:

PART 4 – FINDINGS OF FACT (per Glendale Municipal Code Title 30, Chapter 30.44).  To justify your Administrative Exception request, please answer all of the following questions:

A.  How will the granting of the exception result in design improvements OR how do the space restrictions of th e site preclude full compliance with Code requirements without hardship? ___________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ B. Why will granting of the exception NOT be detrimental to the public welfare? __________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ C. Why will granting of the exception be in keeping with the objective/s of the applicable re gulation/s?  ______________________

Note:  Failure to furnish any of the requested information will delay action on the request. Three (3) copies of this application are to be submitted.  Attach additional pages as needed.

PART 1 – NOTICE TO APPELLANT (please read carefully)
A. This form must be prepared and filed, within 15 days of the date of the decision being appealed.

B. Every question must be answered.

C. If a question does not apply, you must answer “does not apply” or words to that ef fect.

D. Failure to properly fill out this notice or failure to make a sufficient statement of a case in this notice, even if in fact you have valid and sound grounds for appeal, may cause your appeal to be dismissed forthwith.

E. Attach additional pages for long answers.

F. Prior to compl eting this form, read the Glendale Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 2.88  Uniform Appeal Procedure on the City’s webpage at https://library.qcode.us/lib/glendale_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_2‐chapter_2_88 Appeal
PART 3 – APPEAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. State the nam e or title of the board, commission or officer from which this appeal is taken ___________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ B. Were you given written notice of the action, ruling or determination?  Yes   No  If “Yes,” attach a copy of the written notice and write the date you received it here ___ ______________________ If “No,” give the following information concerning your receipt of notice of the action, ruling or determination.

Date __________________  Time __________________  Location __________________  Manner __________________ C.  State generally what kind of permit, variance, ruling, determination or other action was the basis for the decision from which the appeal is taken __ _______________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ D.  State the specific permission or relief that was originally sought from the board, commission, or officer _______ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.  Were you the party seeking the relief that was originally sought?  Yes   No  If “No,” how are you involved with the permi t,  variance, ruling, determination, or other action referred to above? ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ F. Does this matter involve real property?  Yes   No  If “Yes,” give the address, or describe the real property affected __________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ PART 2 – APPELLANT INFORMATION
A._______________________________________________________________________________________________________ First Name           Last Name Email Address
B._______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Street Address                 City     State                Zip Code      Area Code ‐ Phone Number Exhibit 14
555 of 561

3/10/2023                       Page 2 of 2

City of Glendale  Community Development Dept., Planning Division  633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103  Glendale, CA  91206  818.548.2140  www.glendaleca.gov/CDD FOR STAFF USE ONLY           Date Stamp
Date received in Permit Services Center ____________   Received by _____________ Fee paid ________________________________________ Receipt No. _____________________________________

Statement of additional facts related to the appeal:  ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The foregoing statements, contained in PARTS 2, 3 and 4 above, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

__________________________________________________  ___ Appellant’s Name – Please Print
__________________________________________ ___     _______________________________ Appellant’s Signature     Date Signed
PART  4  –  STATEMENT  OF  ERROR
A. Do you contend that there was a violation of a specific provision of law, which forms the basis for this appeal? ___Yes ___No      If “Yes”, state each specific provision of law that you contend was violated: _______________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ B. Do you contend that th
e  board, commission or officer exceeded its authority by virtue of any of the provisions of law given in answer “A”? ___Yes   ___No      If “Yes”, state which provisions, and state specifically each act that was in excess of authority:  ________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ C. Do you contend that the board, commission or officer failed to fulfill a ma ndatory duty by any provision of law given in
answer “A”? ___Yes   ___No      If “Yes”, state which provision, and the specific duty that it failed to exercise:
____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ D. Do you contend that the board, commission or officer refused to hear or consider certain facts before rendering its decision? ___Y
es   ___No      If “Yes”, state each such fact, and for each fact, state how it should have changed the act, determination or ruling:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. Do you contend that the evidence before the board, commission or officer was insufficient or inadequate to support its action, determination or r
uling or any specific finding in support thereof? ___Yes   ___No If “Yes”, state what evidence was necessary, but lacking:  ________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ F. Do you contend that you have new evidence of material facts not previously presented, which if considered should change the act, determination or ruling? ___Yes   _ __No      If  “Yes”, state each new material fact not previously presented to the board, commission or officer. For each fact, state why it was not available, or with the exercise of reasonable diligence could not have been discovered and previously presented by the appellant:
556 of 561

Writer’s email:[email protected]
August 24, 2023

VIA EMAIL
[email protected]
Vista Ezzati

CITY OF GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL
613 E. Broadway
Glendale, CA 91206
Re: Legal Action Network
Appeal of 1900 Riverside Drive Design Review Board Meeting August 10, 2023 PDR 000210-2022
PS File No.: 1005-2300
Dear Members of the City Council,
This firm has been retained by Legal Action Network LLC (LAN) which is a network organization of community members, equestrians, business and equestrian business owners, residents, organizations, and other stakeholders that represent the urban horse communities of Los Angeles (Los Angeles Equestrian Center), Burbank, and Glendale, California. The Riverside Rancho in the City of Glendale and the Rancho Equestrian District in Burbank are part of only three urban horse communities in the United States. All three connect to Griffith Park in Los Angeles.

We submitted a letter opposing the demolition of the existing buildings at 1900 Riverside Drive. We understand that despite our opposition, the demolition was approved.

We understand that one of the key conditions that the Design Review Board did impose on the applicant prior to any demolition is that the public easement on Allen be vacated. We understand that the west side of Allen will be their driveway to parking at the rear of their property. This portion of Allen is also frequently referred to as the “Alley”. We have not been informed of the public process of vacating this easement and believe that if it is vacated, the equestrian access over the channel for rental horses will be significantly limited. As we are sure the City Council knows, this public easement is one of the few access points from Glendale to the Los Angeles Equestrian Center. In addition to the use of the existing easement or public horse access, it is used by hikers, emergency vehicles and utilities such as SCE. Simply having a condition that the easement must be vacated prior to any demolition does not provide the public with how they can have their input and concerns about the vacating of the easement heard and considered. As a result, you have forced LAN to file this appeal to protect their rights and ability to address the vacating of the easement.

In addition to the issue regarding the vacating of the easement, the public has provided significant comments and testimony regarding the impacts of this new proposed project and the 557 of 561

August 25, 2023
City of Glendale City Council

Page 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting