Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
24 1. Throughout existing and new sections of any existing building whenever total additions result in an increase of more than 1000 square feet (92.9 m2) in the total floor area, including mezzanines or additional stories, regardless of ownership. Additions shall be cumulative with each application for building permit within the previous five years.
Exception: Group R, Division 3 occupancies.
2. Throughout existing and new sections of any existing building whenever alterations exceed fifty percent (50%) of the replacement value, as determined by the building official. Alteration values shall be cumulative with each application for a building permit within the previous five years.
Exception: Expenditures for tenant improvements, maintenance and repairs such as interior and exterior painting, carpeting, interior window coverings, drapes, movable partitions, surface re-roofing or plumbing, mechanical and electrical repairs.
3. Throughout existing and new sections of any existing building for which there is an occupancy classification change to a more hazardous use, as determined by the fire code official or building official.
4. Throughout any existing Group R Division 2 occupancy being subdivided to condominium units.
5. Existing high-rise buildings. “Existing high-rise buildings,” as defined in Volume I shall have an automatic sprinkler system installed and operational throughout.
6. Existing mid-rise buildings. Existing mid-rise buildings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system installed and operational throughout. For the purpose of this section, “mid-rise building” means any building six or more stories in height or more than 55 feet (16,764 mm) in height and not defined as a high-rise building. Measurement shall 272
355 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
25 be from the underside of the roof or floor above the topmost occupiable space to the lowest fire apparatus access road level or building access, whichever is lower.
Exception: Open parking garages.
7. Existing low-rise building. Existing low-rise buildings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system installed and operational throughout. For the purpose of this section, “low-rise building” means any building four or more stories in height but less than 55 feet (16,764 mm) in height from the lowest level of Fire Department access.
Measurement shall be from the underside of the roof or floor above the topmost occupiable space to the lowest fire apparatus access road level or building access, whichever is lower.
Exception: Open parking garages.
903.2.21.2.1 Notification, recordation, enforcement, and standards.
Notification, recordation, enforcement and standards addressed in this Section 903.2.21.2.1 shall be enforced by the fire code official to ensure compliance with Section 903.2.21.2, subsections 6, 7, and 8.
1. Notification. Whenever, pursuant to Section 903.2.21.2, the fire code official determines by inspection that a building does not conform to the minimum requirements of Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, 7 or 8, the fire code official shall prepare a fire/life safety notice in writing that the building be repaired and modified to conform to the minimum requirements of said Sections. The notice shall specify in what manner the building fails to meet the minimum requirements of Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, 7, or 8. It shall direct that plans be submitted, and that necessary permits be obtained not later than one (1) year after the service of the notice, and that necessary corrections be completed not later than three (3) 273
356 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
26 years thereafter for work required under Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, not later than four (4) years thereafter for work required under Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 7 and not later than five (5) years thereafter for work required under Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 8. The notice shall be transmitted by the fire code official for enforcement purposes. The fire code official shall serve the notice either personally or by certified or registered mail upon the owner as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and upon the person, if any, in real or apparent charge or control of the building. The provisions of this Section 903.2.21.2.1 are not intended to prevent the fire code official from also making a determination or issuing an order regarding failure to comply with Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, 7, or 8.
2. Recordation. At the time that the fire code official serves the aforementioned order or notice, the fire code official shall file with the Office of the County Recorder, a certificate stating that the subject building does not meet the minimum fire safety requirements of Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, 7, or 8 and that the owner thereof has been so notified. After all necessary corrective work has been performed; the fire code official shall file with the Office of the County Recorder, a certificate terminating the status of the subject building as nonconforming to the minimum fire safety requirements of Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, 7, or 8.
3. Enforcement. If the owner or other person in charge and control of the subject building fails to comply with the aforementioned order or notice within the time periods set forth in Section 903.2.21.2.1, such person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine or by imprisonment or both. A person is guilty of a separate offense each day during which he or she commits, continues or permits a violation of Section 903.2.21.2, subsection 6, 7, or 8.
The fire code official shall also order that the building owner or other person in charge and 274
357 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
27 control post a notice of non-conformance. The notice shall be placed in a conspicuous area of the building until all required corrective work has been completed.
SECTION VI-27. Section 906.8 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023 is hereby amended to read as follows:
906.8 Cabinets. Cabinets used to house portable fire extinguishers shall not be locked.
Exceptions:
1. Where portable fire extinguishers subject to malicious use or damage are provided with a means of ready access.
2. In Group I-3 occupancies and in mental health areas in Group I-2 occupancies, access to portable fire extinguishers shall be permitted to be locked or to be located in staff locations provided the staff has keys.
In new construction, fire extinguishers shall be located within recessed or semi-recessed cabinets.
In existing occupancies, fire extinguishers shall be located within recessed or semi-recessed cabinets when required by the fire code official. Cabinets should be mounted at no higher than four feet (1219 mm) above the floor to the top of the cabinet. Fire extinguishers shall be mounted with the brackets or hangers within the cabinets.
Exception: Surface mounted cabinets may be installed when construction material makes recessing the cabinet impracticable.
SECTION VI-28. Section 906.9.1 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby amended to read as follows:
906.9.1 Extinguishers weighing 40 pounds or less. Portable fire extinguishers having a gross weight not exceeding 40 pounds (18kg) shall be installed so that their tops are not more than 48 inches (1219 mm) above the floor.
275
358 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
28 SECTION VI-29. Section 907.6.6 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2020, is hereby amended to read as follows:
907.6.6 Monitoring. Fire alarm systems required by this chapter or by the California Building Code shall be monitored by an approved central station service system in accordance with NFPA 72 Section 26.3 and this section.
Exception: Monitoring by a supervising station is not required for
1. Single- and multiple-station smoke alarms required by Section 907.2.11.
2. Group I-3 occupancies shall be monitored in accordance with Section 907.2.6.3.
3. Automatic sprinkler systems in one-and two-family dwellings.
SECTION VI-30. Section 907.11 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows:
907.11 Certification and Identification of Certificated Systems. 907.11.1 New Systems. All new fire alarm systems shall maintain a valid Certificate as required by NFPA 72 Section 26.3 for the life of the system. The permittee and the listed contractor issuing the Certificate shall be one and the same. 907.11.2 Existing systems. The fire code official is authorized to order existing systems to provide central station service system monitoring if no monitoring exists, or upgrade existing monitoring to central station service system monitoring, in accordance with the provisions of Section 907.6.6 as amended, and this Section, when any one of the following conditions occur:
1. Systems produce three or more false or nuisance alarm activations within a 12- month period.
2. Systems become unmaintainable or unreliable due to dilapidation or deterioration as determined by the fire code official.
276
359 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
29 3. Upon replacement of the fire alarm control unit, or when 25% or more of the devices are replaced.
4. A change in occupancy occurs to a more hazardous use as determined by the fire code official.
Exception: Group R Division 3 occupancies.
SECTION VI-31. Section 1033 Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, and by such reference, is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 1033 Special egress graphics.
1033.1 General. When required by the fire code official, a special egress graphics package shall be incorporated into new and existing structures. Such structures may include parking structures, warehouses, high-rise buildings, mid-rise buildings, complex projects, or when required by the fire code official. The package may include one or more of the following.
1. Oversized exit identification. Signs or graphics shall be provided to assist in identification of exits, and shall be so designed and installed so as to be visible to occupants from a distance of not less than 300 feet (91,440 mm).
2. Supplemental egress graphics. Supplemental egress graphics shall be provided to assist in the orderly and safe evacuation or relocation of people. Such graphics shall be performance based and include way-finding to identify egress paths and termination points.
3. Special egress graphics - finishes. Means of egress shall be painted and / or constructed with or otherwise finished with materials as per the Building Code or as otherwise approved by the fire code official.
SECTION VI-32. Section 1103.2 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety 277
360 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
30 Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows:
Section 1103.2 Emergency responder communication coverage in existing buildings.
Existing buildings other than Group R-3, that do not have approved in-building, two-way emergency response communication coverage for emergency responders in the building based on existing coverage for emergency responders in the building based on existing coverage levels of the public safety communication system, shall be equipped with such coverage according to one of the following:
1. Where an existing wired communication system cannot be repaired or is being replaced, or where not approved in accordance with Section 510.1 Exception 1.
2. Within a time frame established by the adopting authority.
Exception: where it is determined by the fire code official that the in-building, two-way emergency responder communication coverage system is not needed.
SECTION VI-33. Section 1103.3 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows
Section 1103.3 Existing elevators, In other than Group R-3 existing elevators, escalators and moving walk shall comply with the requirements in Sections 1103.1 and 1103.3.3.
SECTION VI-34. Section 1104 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows
Section 1104 Means of egress for existing buildings, of the International Fire Code, 2021 edition published and copyrighted by the International Code Council with amendments of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby adopted by reference into Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, and by such reference, is incorporated herein as if fully set forth 278
361 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
31 SECTION VI-35. Section 4902.1 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby amended to add the following definitions as follows:
4901.3 Liability for damage
4901.3 Liability for damage. The expense of fighting fire that results from a violation of this chapter shall be charged against the person whose violation of this chapter caused the fire.
Damages caused by such fires shall constitute a debt of such person and are collectable by the fire code official in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract expressed or implied.
4902.1 General.
DEFENSIBLE SPACE. That space within 100 feet (30 480 mm) of a building or structure where vegetation capable of causing a fire to spread must be modified to slow the rate and intensity of an advancing wildfire to provide access by fire and other emergency personnel to defend the building or structure from the threat of fire.
HAZARDOUS VEGETATION. Refuse, grass, weeds, shrubs, trees, or other vegetation which, in the opinion of the fire code official, are in such condition and location, or by the unique characteristics of a species, as to provide a ready fuel supply to augment the spread or intensity of a fire.
4907.1 General.
4907.1 General. Hazardous vegetation and fuels shall be managed to reduce the severity of potential exterior wildfire exposure to buildings and to reduce the risk of fire spreading to buildings as required by applicable laws and regulations. Hazardous vegetation or refuse shall be abated, and all grass, weeds, shrubs, and trees shall be properly maintained so as to not create a fire hazard within the community, while maintaining sufficient vegetation for aesthetic and soil erosion control purposes. Maintenance shall occur on a year-round basis to ensure the removal 279
362 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
32 and/or proper maintenance of grass, weeds, shrubs, trees and refuse in order to prevent the spread or intensity of fire within the community and to ensure adequate “defensible space” in the urban/wildland interface area of the city, referred to as the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Areas (also known as the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone). 4906.3 Requirements.
4906.3 Requirements. Hazardous vegetation and fuels around all applicable buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations. Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to preclude the fire code official from requiring more than the minimum specific requirements set forth herein when the fire code official determines that conditions exist that necessitates greater fire protection measures.
1. Public Resources Code, Section 4291.
2. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 1.5, Chapter 7, Subchapter 3, Section 1299 (see guidance for implementation “General Guideline to Create Defensible Space”).
3. California Government Code, Section 51182.
4. California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 7, Subchapter 1, Section
3.07. 5. Glendale Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau “Vegetation Management Program (VMP) Defensible Space Guidelines”.
4907.4 Specific requirements.
4907.4.1 Roads. Maintain trees and hazardous vegetation within 10 feet (3048 mm) of that portion of a highway, street, alley, or driveway which is improved or used for vehicle travel or other vehicular purposes that the fire code official determines as used for access or egress. 4907.4.2 Cut vegetation and refuse. Remove and/or safely dispose of all cut vegetation and 280
363 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
33 hazardous refuse. Cut grass may be left on the slope to protect the soil if it lays down within three (3) inches (76 mm) of the ground. Cut vegetation may be chipped or mulched and left on the slope up to a depth of 12 inches (305 mm).
4907.4.3 Soil erosion control. If the abatement of hazardous vegetation results in the exposure of bare mineral soil, or the soil is exposed to such an extent that increased soil erosion would be likely, or the fire code official determines that the abatement has been excessive and poses a threat to the public health, safety or welfare, suitable erosion control measures must be provided to establish effective soil erosion control to the satisfaction of the fire code official. 4907.5 Enforcement.
4907.5.1 Public Nuisance, Inspection Process. The Council finds that hazardous vegetation prohibited under Section 4907 increases the danger of fire and thus constitutes a public nuisance.
If such condition exists, the fire code official shall give written notice to the owner of record and a copy of said notice to any other person with possessory interest in the property, to abate the nuisance within 30 days from the date the notice was sent. The notice shall be sent by certified mail and shall state that the owner is required to abate the nuisance and that if the nuisance is not abated, the city may take further action which may include but is not limited to the following actions: (1) the city, or its contractor, may enter upon the parcel of land and remove or otherwise eliminate or abate the nuisance, (2) upon completion of such work the cost thereof, including administrative costs, shall become a special assessment against that parcel, and (3) upon city council confirmation of the assessment and recordation of said notice, a lien shall attach to the parcel to be collected on the next regular property tax bill levied against the parcel. 281
364 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
34 4907.5.2 Commencement of abatement proceeding. Whenever the fire code official determines that a public nuisance exists, and following mailing of the notice under Section 4907.5, the abatement proceedings shall commence.
4907.5.3 Abatement proceeding--service of notice of city’s intent to abate a public nuisance. In the event the owner or any other person with possessory interest in the property fails to abate hazardous vegetation pursuant to notice given under Section 4907.5, the fire code official shall notify the owner of record of the affected property as shown on the latest equalized tax assessment roll, by certified mail, that the city intends to abate the public nuisance. A copy of said notice shall also be mailed to any other person with possessory interest in the property. Said notice shall be sent not less than 15 days prior to the date of the city’s proposed abatement. The fire code official shall also post a copy of said notice in a conspicuous location on the property.
Failure of any owner or other party having possessory interest in the property to receive a notice hereunder, shall not affect the validity of said notice nor any proceeding taken hereunder, provided that the procedure for service of notice has been followed. The notice of intention shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF INTENTION
TO ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCE
(Name and address of owner of the land)
"As owner shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the land located at (address), you are hereby notified that the undersigned, pursuant to the Glendale Building and Safety Code, Volume VI, Section 4907 determined that there exists upon said land or building the following condition which constitutes a public nuisance pursuant to the provisions of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, Volume VI, Section 4907.
282
365 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
35 "You are hereby notified to abate said nuisance within 15 days from the date of mailing of this notice, and upon your failure to do so, the same will be abated by whatever action necessary by the city and the costs thereof, together with administrative costs, assessed to you as owner of the land on which said public nuisance is located.
"As owner of the land on which said public nuisance is located, you are hereby notified that you may, within 10 days after the mailing of this notice of intention, request in writing to the fire code official a public hearing to contest the finding of the public nuisance on said property. If such a request is not received by the fire code official within such 10-day period, the fire code official shall have the authority to abate said public nuisance and assess the costs as aforesaid without a public hearing. You may submit a sworn written statement within such 10-day period setting forth your position and intentions regarding the public nuisance on said property with your reasons for denial and such statement shall be construed as a request for hearing at which your presence is not required. You may appear in person at any hearing requested by you or, in lieu thereof, may present a sworn written statement aforesaid in time for consideration at such hearing.”
Notice Mailed
(Date)
s/
Fire Chief
4907.5.4 Appeals. The owner of the substandard property may appeal the finding of the fire code official by submitting within a ten (10) day period from the date of the mailing of the Notice, to the fire code official, a written request for a hearing before the Building and Fire Board of Appeals. Appeals under this section shall be held before the Building and Fire Board 283
366 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
36 of Appeals, which shall hear all facts and testimony it deems pertinent. The facts and testimony may include testimony on the condition of the property and circumstances related to the nuisance. The owner of the land may appear in person at the hearing or present a sworn written statement in time for consideration at the hearing. The Building and Fire Board of Appeals may impose such conditions and take such other action as it deems appropriate to carry out the purpose of the provisions of this section. The decision of the Building and Fire Board of Appeals may be appealed to the city council pursuant to the Uniform Appeals Procedure, Chapter 2.88, Glendale Municipal Code.
4907.5.5 Procedure. If any order of the Building and Fire Board of Appeals made pursuant to Section 4907 is not complied with within the period designated by the Board, the fire code official may then cause such work to be done to the extent necessary to eliminate the public nuisance and other substandard conditions determined to exist by the Board and the cost of such work shall be assessed to the property as set forth in California Government Code Section 38773.5 and as that section may subsequently be amended. 4907.5.6 Emergency procedures. Notwithstanding any other provision in Section 4907, when in the opinion of the fire code official, a substandard structure or substandard property is an immediate hazard to life and property, and the fire code official makes written findings to the effect that abatement of such hazard requires action, the fire code official may then cause such work to be done to the extent necessary to eliminate the hazard. The fire code official shall attempt to contact the property owner, to the extent possible, to inform the owner of the work to be done and request said owner’s assistance or immediate voluntary removal of the hazard. At the time or shortly thereafter the work is performed, the fire code official shall post a notice and mail to the property owner a statement of the nature of the work performed. Any individual aggrieved by the action of the fire code official under this section, may appeal the determination 284
367 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
37 of the action to the Building and Fire Board of Appeals as set forth in Section 4907.5.4 except that the appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of mailing the notice of work performed.
4907.5.7 Costs. The costs involved in the correction of substandard conditions in any action to abate a nuisance shall be charged against the owner of the property. In addition to the above costs, an administrative processing fee established by resolution of the council of the City of Glendale, shall be assessed against each parcel for fire department costs associated with abatement. The fire code official shall review the fees at least once annually, and shall recommend changes to the council when the costs for the services make it appropriate. The fire code official shall notify all parties concerned by certified mail as to the amount of such assessment resulting from such work. If the total assessment determined as provided for in this section is not paid within thirty (30) days after mailing of such notice, such charges shall be placed as a special assessment on the tax bill for the property pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 38773.5 of the California Government Code and as that section by subsequently be amended. If applicable, an award of attorney’s fees to a prevailing party shall also be assessed. 4907.5.8 Recording of notice of special assessment lien. After performing any hazard abatement work or taking any actions to correct substandard conditions, the fire code official shall cause to be recorded with the County Recorder a “Notice of Special Assessment Lien.” Such notice shall summarize the work performed, the cost and date of completion. 4907.5.9 Collection of costs by lien not exclusive remedy. The Council declares that it is the intent of the City of Glendale to collect costs charged against the city after performing any public nuisance or hazard abatement work or correcting substandard conditions by lien or any other legal remedies.
285
368 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
38 4907.5.9.1 Owner costs. Re-inspection and administrative fees to ascertain code compliance for overdue abatement of previously noticed or cited violations shall be charged against the owner. 4907.5.9.2 Notice of public hearing on lien. If the amount of such expenses as shown in such statement is not paid to the fire code official within thirty (30) days after such notice, the fire code official shall prepare a written notice to the owner of the property upon which the city intends to file a lien. Upon preparation of such notice, the fire code official shall present same to the city council, and the city council shall forthwith, by resolution, fix a time and place for a public hearing on such notice. The fire code official shall cause a copy of such notice to be served on the owner of the property not less than ten (10) days prior to the time fixed for such hearing. Mailing a copy of such notice to the owner of the property at the address listed in the most recent property ownership records provided to the city by the County Assessor as of the date the fire code official causes notice to be sent by certified mail and shall comprise proper service. Service shall be deemed complete at the time of deposit in the United States mail. At the public hearing as scheduled above, the city council will hear all noticed or affected property owners who would be obligated to pay the abatement and related costs incurred by the city. The city council shall confirm the appropriateness of persons to be held responsible for the noticed abatement charges and report to the fire code official its final determinations of liability concerning the affected parties. Charges confirmed by the city council and not paid within five (5) days of the public hearing date will be subject to lien and collection procedures. 4907.5.9.3 Recording of lien. The fire code official shall record in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, a certificate substantially in the following form:
“NOTICE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIEN”
286
369 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
39 Pursuant to authority vested in me by the Glendale Building and Safety Code, I did on the day of , , cause a condition to be abated or chargeable action to occur on the hereinafter-described real property at the expenses of the owner thereof, in the amount of $ . Said amount has not been paid nor any part thereof, and the City of Glendale does hereby claim a lien upon the hereinafter-described real property in said amount. The same shall be a lien upon the said real property until said sum, with interest thereon from the date of recordation of this lien in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, and such other charges as may be set by resolution of the city council, has been paid in full. The real property hereinabove mentioned and upon which a lien is claimed is that certain parcel of land lying and being in the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, and particularly described as follows:
Assessor’s Parcel Number
Dated this day of , .
Fire Chief, City of Glendale
4907.5.10 Method of collection. With the confirmation of the report by the city council, the hazard abatement charges contained therein that remain unpaid by the owner of the subject property shall constitute a special assessment against said property as it has received the special benefit of city abatement services. The same shall be a lien against the property described therein until the amount.
SECTION VI-36. Section 5707 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows
287
370 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
40 Section 5707, ON-DEMAND MOBILE FUELING OPERATIONS, of the International Fire Code, 2021 edition published and copyrighted by the International Code Council with amendments of the 2022 California Fire Code is hereby adopted by reference into Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, and by such reference, is incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
SECTION VI-37. Appendix B Table B105.2 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby amended to read as follows:
TABLE B105.2
REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR BUILDINGS OTHER THAN ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, GROUP R-3 AND R-4 BUILDINGS AND TOWNHOUSES
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
SYSTEM
(Design Standard)
MINIMUM FIRE FLOW
(gallons per minute)
FLOW DURATION
(hours)
No automatic sprinkler system Value in Table B105.1(2) Duration in Table B105.1(2) Section 903.3.1.1 of the
California Fire Code
Up to 50% of the value in
Table B105.1(2) as approved a
Duration in Table B105.1(2) at
the reduced flow rate
For SI: 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 L/min
a. The reduced fire flow shall be not less than 1,000 1.500 gallons per minute.
SECTION VI-38. Section 5707 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows.
TABLE C102.1—REQUIRED NUMBER AND SPACING OF FIRE HYDRANTS f
FIRE-FLOW
REQUIREMENT
(gpm)
MINIMUM
NUMBER
OF
HYDRANTS
AVERAGE
SPACING
BETWEEN
HYDRANTS
b, c
(feet)
MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM
ANY POINT ON STREET OR
ROAD FRONTAGE TO A
HYDRANT d
288
371 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
41 1,750 or less
1,751 – 2, 250
2,251 – 2,750
2,751 – 3,250
3,251 – 4,000
4,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 5,500
5,501 – 6,000
6,001 – 7,000
7,001 or more
1 2
3 3
4 5
6 6
7 8 more
e
300
300
300
300
300
a
300 a
300 a
250 a
250 a
200 a
250
225
225
225
210
180
180
150
150
120
For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 L/min a. Reduce by 100 feet for dead-end streets or roads.
b. Where streets are provided with median dividers which cannot be crossed by firefighters pulling hose lines, or arterial streets are provided with four or more traffic lanes and have a traffic count of more than 30,000 vehicles per day, hydrant spacing shall average 500 feet on each side of the street and be arranged on an alternating basis. c. Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be provided at not less than 1,000-feet to provide for transportation hazards.
d. Reduce by 50 feet for dead-end streets or roads.
e. One hydrant for each 1,000 gallons per minute or fraction thereof. f. The fire code official is authorized to modify the location, number and distribution of the fire hydrants based on site-specific constraints and hazards.
SECTION VI-39. Appendix D, fire apparatus access roads, of the California Fire Code edition, published and copyrighted by the International Code Council, are hereby adopted by reference into Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, and by such reference, are incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
SECTION VI-40. Appendix D107 of Volume VI of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section D107 NEW ONE- OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, New developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. 289
372 of 606
Attachment 8_[4] GBSC_2023_Volume VI
42 Exceptions:
1. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units accessed from a single public or private fire apparatus access road, and all dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3, access from two directions shall not be required. This exception does not apply when the dwelling units are located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. 290
373 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
1 VOLUME VII. SECURITY STANDARDS
SECTION VII-1. Volume VII of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023 is hereby adopted to read as follows:
1. Title. This Code shall be referred to and cited as Volume VII of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023.
2. Purpose. The purpose of this Code is to provide minimum standards to safeguard property and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings and structures within the City of Glendale as required in Section 14051 of the California Penal Code relating to Building Security.
3. Scope.
3.1. New Construction. The provisions of this Code shall apply to new construction and to additions or alterations to existing buildings and structures except as specifically provided by this Code.
3.2. Existing Multiple Family Dwellings. Existing multiple family dwelling units which are converted to privately owned family units (condominiums or cooperatives) shall comply with the provisions of Section 14 (Special Residential Building Provisions) in this Code.
3.3 Exemption. Any building as defined in Volume IA, IB and Title 19 - California Administrative Code, requiring special type releasing latching, or locking devices, other than described herein, shall be exempt from the provisions hereof relating to locking devices of interior and exterior doors. 291
374 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
2 4. Definitions. For the purpose of this Code certain terms are defined as follows:
APPROVED. Approved shall mean certified as meeting the requirements of this Code by the enforcing authority or its authorized agents, or by other officials designated by law to give approval on a particular matter dealt with by the provisions of this Code with regard to a given material, mode of construction, piece of equipment or device.
AUXILIARY LOCKING DEVICE. Auxiliary Locking Device shall mean a secondary locking system added to the primary locking system to provide additional security.
BOLT. Bolt shall mean a metal bar which, when actuated, is projected (or thrown) either horizontally or vertically into a retaining member, such as a strike plate, to prevent a door or window from moving or opening.
BOLT PROJECTION OR BOLT THROW. Bolt projection or bolt throw shall mean the distance from the edge of the door, at the bolt center line to the farthest point on the bolt in the projected position.
BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING. Burglary resistant glazing shall mean those materials as defined in Underwriter's Laboratory (U.L.) Bulletin 972.
COMMERCIAL BUILDING. Commercial building shall mean a building, or portion thereof used for a purpose other than for a dwelling.
COMPONENT. Component, as distinguished from a part, shall mean a subassembly which combines with other components to make up a total door or window assembly.
For example, the primary components of a door assembly include: door, lock, hinges, jamb/wall, jamb/strike and wall.
292
375 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
3 CYLINDER. Cylinder shall mean the subassembly of a lock containing the cylinder core, tumbler mechanism and the keyway. A double cylinder lock is one which has a key-actuated cylinder on both the exterior and interior of the door.
CYLINDER CORE OR CYLINDER PLUG. Cylinder core or cylinder plug shall mean the central part of a cylinder containing the keyway, which is rotated by the key to operate the lock mechanism.
CYLINDER GUARD. Cylinder guard shall mean a tapered or flush metal ring or plate surrounding the otherwise exposed portion of a cylinder lock to resist cutting, drilling, prying, pulling, or wrenching with common tools.
DEADBOLT. Deadbolt shall mean a lock bolt which does not have a spring action as opposed to a latch bolt, which does. Deadbolts shall conform to the requirements of locks or latches prescribed in Volume IA and IB of this Code and shall comply with Grade1 ANSI-designation deadbolt locks.
DEAD LATCH OR DEADLOCKING LATCH BOLT. Dead latch or deadlocking latch bolt shall mean a spring actuated latch bolt having a beveled end and incorporating a plunger which, when depressed, automatically locks the projected latch bolt against return by end pressure.
DEMISING WALL. A common wall that separates one tenant’s space from another or from the building’s common areas shall be constructed from the floor to the roof or floor deck above.
DOOR ASSEMBLY. Door assembly shall mean a unit composed of a group of parts or components which make up a closure for an opening to control passageway through a wall. For the purposes of this Code, a door assembly consists of the following parts:
293
376 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
4 door, hinges, locking device or devices, operation contacts (such as handles, knobs, push plates), miscellaneous hardware and closures, the frame, including the head, threshold and jambs plus the anchorage divides to the surrounding wall and a portion of the surrounding wall extending 36 inches (914mm) from each side of the jambs and 26 inches (660mm) from the head.
DOOR STOP. Door stop shall mean that projection along the top and sides of a door jamb which checks the door's swinging action.
DOUBLE CYLINDER DEADBOLT. Double cylinder deadbolt shall mean a deadbolt lock which can be activated only by a key on both the interior and exterior.
DWELLING. Dwelling shall mean a building or portion thereof designed primarily for residential occupancy, including single family and multiple family dwellings.
ENFORCING AUTHORITY. Enforcing authority shall mean the agency or person having the responsibility for enforcing the provisions of this volume.
FLUSHBOLT. Flushbolt shall mean a manual, key, or turn operated metal bolt normally used on inactive door(s) and is attached to the top and bottom of the door and engages the head and threshold of the frame.
FULLY TEMPERED GLASS. Fully tempered glass shall mean those materials meeting or exceeding ANSI standard Z 97.1 - Safety Glazing.
JAMB. Jamb shall mean the vertical members of a door frame to which the door is secured.
JAMB/WALL. Jamb/wall shall mean that component of a door assembly to which a door is attached and secured; the wall and jamb used together are considered a unit. 294
377 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
5 KEY-IN-KNOB. Key-in-knob shall mean a lockset having the key cylinder and other lock mechanisms contained in the knob.
LATCH OR LATCH BOLT. Latch or latch bolt shall mean a beveled, spring-actuated bolt which may or may not have a deadlocking device.
LOCK OR LOCKSET. Lock (or lockset) shall mean a keyed device (complete with cylinder, latch or deadbolt mechanism, and trim such as knobs, levers, thumb turns, escutcheons, or shields and guards, etc.) for securing a door in a closed position against forced entry. For the purposes of this Code, a lock does not include the strike plate.
LOCKING DEVICE. Locking device shall mean a part of a window assembly which is intended to prevent movement of the movable sash, which may be the sash lock or sash operator.
MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING. Multiple family dwelling shall mean a building or portion thereof designed for occupancy by two or more families living independently of each other, including hotels, motels, apartments, duplexes and townhouses.
PANIC HARDWARE. Panic hardware shall mean a latching device on a door assembly for use when emergency egress is required due to fire or other threat to life safety.
Devices shall be designed so that they will facilitate the safe egress of people in case of an emergency when a pressure not to exceed 15 lbs. (66.72N) is applied to the releasing device in the direction of exit travel. Such releasing devices are bars or panels extending not less than two-thirds of the width of the door and placed at heights suitable for the service required, not less than 30 inches (762mm) or more than 44 inches (1118mm) above the floor.
295
378 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
6 PART. Part, as distinguished from component, shall mean a unit (or subassembly) which combines with other units to make up a component.
PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE. Primary locking device shall mean the single locking system on a door or window unit whose primary function is to prevent unauthorized intrusion.
PRIVATE OR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING. Private or single family dwelling shall mean a building designed exclusively for occupancy by one family.
RAIL. Rail shall mean the horizontal member of a window or door. A meeting rail is one which mates with a rail of another sash or a framing member of the door or window frame when the sash is in the closed position.
SASH. Sash shall mean an assembly of stiles, rails, or mullions assembled into a single frame which supports the glazing material. A fixed sash is one which is not intended to be opened. A movable sash is intended to be open.
SILL. Sill shall mean the lowest horizontal member of a window frame.
SINGLE CYLINDER DEADBOLT. Single cylinder deadbolt shall mean a deadbolt lock which is activated from the outside by a key and from the inside by a knob, thumb- turn, lever, or similar mechanism.
SOLID CORE DOOR. Solid core door shall mean a door composed of solid wood or composed of compressed wood equal in strength to solid wood construction.
STILE. Stile shall mean a vertical framing member of a window or door.
STRIKE. Strike shall mean a metal plate attached to or mortised into a door or door jamb to receive and to hold a projected latch bolt and/or deadbolt in order to secure the door to the jamb.
296
379 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
7 SWINGING DOOR. Swinging door shall mean a door hinged at the stile or at the head and threshold.
U.L. LISTED. U.L. Listed shall mean tested and listed by Underwriter's Laboratory, Inc.
WINDOW ASSEMBLY. Window assembly shall mean a unit which includes a window and the anchorage between the window and the wall.
WINDOW FRAME. Window frame shall mean that part of a window which surrounds and supports the sashes and is attached to the surrounding wall. The members include side jambs (vertical), head jamb (upper, horizontal), sill and mullions.
5. Enforcement Provisions. The enforcing authority is directed to administer and enforce the provisions of this Code. The enforcing authority shall be the building official as defined in Volume IA of this Code.
6. Right of Entry. The enforcing authority shall have the right, and is hereby authorized and empowered, to enter or go on or about any building as provided by Chapter 1 Division II Section [A] 104.6 of Volume IA of this Code.
7. Violations and Penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, convert, demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure in the City of Glendale, or cause same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of this Code.
8. Exemptions, Appeals. Appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made by the building official relative to the applications and interpretations of this Code shall be in accordance with Chapter I Division II Section 113 of Volume IA of this Code. 297
380 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
8 9. Alternate Materials and Methods of Construction. The provisions of this Volume are not intended to prevent the use of any material or method of construction not specifically prescribed herein, provided any such alternate has been approved by the enforcing authority or as provided in Section 5, nor is it the intention of this Volume to exclude any similarly approved sound method or structural design or analysis not specifically provided for in this Volume. Materials, methods of construction, or structural design limitations provided for in this Volume are to be used unless an exception is granted by the enforcing authority. Such alternate materials or methods may be approved provided it is found that the proposed design is satisfactory and the material and method of work is, for the purpose intended, at least equivalent to that prescribed in this Code in quality, strength, effectiveness, burglary resistance, durability and safety.
10. Keying Requirements. Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in a tract or commercial development, constructed under the same general plan, shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships or similar distinct occupancies. A certificate from the lock supplier declaring that all locks supplied to the project are keyed separately shall be acceptable as complying with the above requirements.
11. Frames, Jambs, Strikes, Hinges: Installation and Construction. Installation and construction of frames, jambs, strikes and hinges shall be as follows:
1. Door Jambs. Door jambs shall be installed with solid backing in such a manner that no voids exist between the strike side of the jamb and the frame opening for a vertical distance of six (6) inches (153mm) each side of the strike. 298
381 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
9 2. Framing. In wood framing, horizontal blocking shall be placed between studs at door lock height for three (3) stud spaces each side of the door openings.
Jambs shall have solid backing against sole plates.
3. Door Stops. Door stops on wooden jambs for in-swinging doors shall be of one piece construction with the jamb. Jambs for all doors shall be constructed or protected so as to prevent violation of the strike.
4. Strike Plate. The strike plate for deadbolts on all wood frame doors shall be constructed of minimum sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel, bronze, or brass and secured to the jamb by a minimum of two screws.
5. Hinges. Hinges for out-swinging doors shall be equipped with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins.
12. Windows/Sliding Glass Doors; Requirements. The following requirements must be met for windows and sliding glass doors:
1. Exterior Window; Exemptions. Except as otherwise specified in Section 14 (Special Residential Building Provisions), and Section 15 (Special Commercial Building Provisions) all openable exterior windows and sliding glass doors shall comply with the tests as set forth in Section 16 (Performance Testing).
2. Louvered Windows. Louvered windows shall not be used when any portion of the window is less than 12 feet (3658mm) vertically or 6 feet (1829mm) horizontally from an accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform, or similar structure.
299
382 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
10 13. Garage-Type Doors. Rolling overhead, solid overhead, swing or sliding accordion garage-type doors shall conform to the following standards:
1. Wood Doors. Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of five-sixteenths (5/16) inch (8mm) in thickness with the locking hardware being attached to the support framing.
2. Aluminum Doors. Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215 inches (.546mm) and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches (458mm) on center along the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot, or pedestrian access, door framing within three (3) inches (76mm) of the strike area of the pilot or pedestrian access door.
3. Fiberglass Doors. Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum density of six (6) ounces per square foot (1831 gram/m
2) from the bottom of the door to a
height of seven (7) feet (2134mm). Panels above seven (7) feet (2134mm) and panels in residential structures shall have a density not less than five (5) ounces per square foot (1526 grams/m
2).
4. Cylinder Locks. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one (1) inch (25.4mm).
5. Wide Doors, Receiving Points. Doors that exceed sixteen (16) feet (4877mm) in width shall have two lock receiving points; or, if the door does not exceed nineteen (19) feet (5791mm), a single bolt may be used if placed in the center of 300
383 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
11 the door with the locking point located either at the floor or door frame header; or, torsion spring counter balance type hardware may be used.
6. Electrically Operated Doors. Except in a residential building, doors secured by electrical operation shall have a keyed-switch to open the door when in a closed position, or by a signal locking device.
7. Slide Bolt Assemblies. Doors with slide bolt assemblies shall have frames a minimum of .120 inches (3mm) in thickness, with a minimum bolt diameter of one-half (½) inch (13mm) and protrude at least one and one-half (1-1/2) inches (38mm) into the receiving guide. A bolt diameter of three-eights (3/8) inch (10mm) may be used in a residential building. The slide bolt shall be attached to the door with non-removable bolts from the outside. Rivets shall not be used to attach slide bolt assemblies.
8. Padlock(s). Except in a residential building, padlock(s) used with exterior mounted slide bolt(s) shall have a hardened steel shackle locking both at heel and toe and a minimum five pin tumbler operation with a non-removable key when in an unlocked position. Padlock(s) used with interior mounted slide bolt(s) shall have a hardened steel shackle with a minimum four pin tumbler operation. A certificate of verification from the contractor/owner declaring that he has advised the occupant of the padlock requirements of this section shall be acceptable as complying with the above requirements.
14. Special Residential Building Provisions.
14.1. Swinging Exterior Doors. Except for vehicular access doors, all exterior swinging doors of any residential building and attached garages, including the 301
384 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
12 door leading from the garage area into the dwelling unit shall be equipped as follows:
1. Wood Doors. All wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1-3/4) inches (45mm), or with panels not less than nine-sixteenths (9/16) inch (15mm) thick.
2. Locks. A single or double door shall be equipped with a single cylinder deadbolt lock. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one (1) inch (25.4mm) and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. The deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least three-fourths (3/4) inch (19mm) into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The cylinder shall have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least one fourth (1/4) inch (6.3mm) in diameter. All installation shall be done so that the performance of the locking device will meet the intended anti- burglary requirements. A dual locking mechanism constructed so that both deadbolt and latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside door knob, or lever, may be substituted provided it meets all other specifications for locking devices.
3. Double Doors. The inactive leaf of double doors shall be equipped with metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of five-eights (5/8) inch (16mm) into the head and threshold or the door frame. 302
385 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
13 4. Glazing. Glazing in exterior doors or within forty (40) inches (1016mm) of any locking mechanism shall be of fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing.
5. Wide Angle Viewer. Except where clear vision panels are installed, all front exterior doors shall be equipped with a wide angle (180 0) door
viewer.
14.2. Address Number and Identifying Data. Address numbers and other identifying data shall be displayed as follows:
1. Address Number. All residential dwellings shall display an address number in a prominent location on the street side of the residence in such a position that the number is easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches (102mm) in height and shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are attached. In addition, any multi-family residence which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway or parking lot shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building. (See also Volume VI Section 505.1)
2. Multiple Family Dwelling; Illuminated Diagrams and Identification Numbers. There shall be positioned at each entrance of a multiple family dwelling complex an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the complex which shows the location of the viewer, the unit designations within the complex, each unit that is a “non smoking” unit (as governed by Chapter 8.52 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, or any successor 303
386 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
14 legislation), the smoking permitted area authorized under Section 8.52.130 of the GMC and the complex’s exits, stairwells, elevators, fire alarm annunciator panels, and standpipes. In addition, each individual unit within the complex shall display a prominent identification number, not less than four (4) inches (102mm) in height, which is easily visible to approaching vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic. In addition, any multiple family dwelling which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway or parking lot shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building.
14.3. Lighting; Multiple Family Dwellings. Lighting in multiple family dwellings shall be as follows:
1. Aisles, Passageways and Recesses. Aisles, passageways and recesses related to and within the building complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at least twenty-five hundredths (.25) of a footcandle (2.7 lux) at the ground level during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant covers.
2. Parking Structures, Parking Lots and Carports. Parking structures, parking lots and carports shall be provided with a minimum of two (2) foot-candles (21.5 lux) of light on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism- resistant covers.
15. Special Commercial Building Provisions.
304
387 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
15 15.1. Swinging Exterior Doors; Construction and Glazing. Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, and solid wood or metal doors of commercial buildings shall be constructed or protected as follows:
1. Wood Doors Construction. Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1-3/4) inches (45mm). Wood panel doors with panels less than one (1) inch (25.4mm) thick shall be covered on the inside with a minimum sixteen (16) U.S. gauge sheet steel, or its equivalent, which is to be attached with screws on minimum six (6) inch (153mm) centers. Hollow steel doors shall be a minimum of sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel and have sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed; such reinforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around any locking device.
2. Glazing, Iron or Steel Grills. Except when double cylinder deadbolts are utilized, any glazing within 40 inches (1016mm) of any door locking mechanism shall be constructed or protected as follows:
2.1. Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing; or
2.2. Iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch (3mm) material with a minimum two (2) inches (52mm) mesh
secured on the inside of the glazing may be utilized; or
2.3. The glazing shall be covered with iron bars of at least one- half (½) inch (13mm) round or one inch by one-fourth inch (1" x 1/4") (24.5mm x 7mm) flat steel material, spaced not 305
388 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
16 more than five (5) inches (122mm) apart, secured on the inside of the glazing.
2.4. Items 2.2 and 2.3 above shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are
required to be openable by the Glendale Building and
Safety Code, 2014.
15.2. Swinging Exterior Doors, Equipment and Construction. All swinging exterior wood and steel doors of commercial buildings shall be equipped as follows:
1. Deadbolts. A single or double door shall be equipped with a double or single cylinder deadbolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one (1) inch (25.4mm) and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. The deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least three-fourths (3/4) inch (19mm) into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The cylinder shall have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least one-fourth (1/4) inch (7mm) in diameter. The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply where (1) panic hardware is required, or (2) an equivalent device is approved by the building official.
2. Construction and Equipment. Double doors shall be constructed and equipped as follows:
2.1. The inactive leaf of double door(s) shall be equipped with metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of five-eighths (5/8) inch (16mm) into the head and threshold of the door frame.
306
389 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
17 2.2. Double doors shall have an astragal constructed of steel a minimum of .125 inch (3mm) thick which will cover the opening between the doors.
The astragal shall be a minimum of two (2) inches (51mm) wide, and extend a minimum of one (1) inch (25.4mm) beyond the edge of the door to which it is attached. The astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means of welding or with non-removable bolts spaced apart on not more than ten (10) inch (254mm) centers.
15.3. Aluminum Door Equipment. Aluminum frame swinging doors of commercial buildings shall be equipped as follows:
1. The jamb on all aluminum frame swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to withstand 1600 pounds (7117N) of pressure in both a vertical distance of three (3) inches (76mm) and a horizontal distance of one (1) inch (25.4mm) each side of the strike, so as to prevent violation of the strike.
2. A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt with a bolt projection exceeding one (1) inch (25.4mm), or a hook shape or expanding dog bolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading.
The deadbolt lock shall have a minimum of five pin tumblers and a cylinder guard.
15.4. Panic Hardware. Panic hardware in commercial buildings, whenever otherwise required by this Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code, shall be installed as follows:
1. Panic hardware shall contain a minimum of two (2) locking points on each door; or
307
390 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
18 2. On single doors, panic hardware may have one locking point which is not to be located at either the top or bottom rails of the door frame. The door shall have an astragal constructed of steel .125 inch (3mm) thick which shall be attached with non-removable bolts to the outside of the door. The astragal shall extend a minimum of one (1) inch (25.4mm) beyond the edge of the door to which it is attached.
3. Double doors containing panic hardware shall have an astragal attached to the doors at their meeting point which will close the opening between them, but not interfere with the operation of either door.
15.5. Sliding Doors. Horizontal sliding doors in commercial buildings shall be equipped with a metal guide track at top and bottom and a cylinder lock and/or padlock with a hardened steel shackle which locks at both heel and toe, and a minimum five pin tumbler operation with non-removable key when in an unlocked position. The bottom track shall be so designed that the door cannot be lifted from the track when the door is in a locked position.
15.6. Office Buildings; Doors to Suites. In office buildings with multiple occupancy, all entrance doors to individual office suites shall meet the construction and locking requirements for exterior doors.
15.7. Accessible Windows. Windows in commercial buildings shall be deemed accessible if less than twelve (12) feet (3658mm) above the ground. Accessible windows having a pane exceeding ninety-six (96) square inches (61935mm 2) in an area with the
smallest dimension exceeding six (6) inches (153mm) and not visible from a public 308
391 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
19 thoroughfare (including any street, alleyway or sidewalk supported and maintained through public funds) shall be protected in the following manner.
1. Fully tempered glass or burglary resistant glazing; or
2. The following window barriers may be used but shall be secured with non- removable bolts:
2.1. Inside or outside iron bars of at least one- half (½) inch (13mm) round or one by one-quarter (1 x 1/4) inch (25.4mm x 7mm) flat steel material, spaced not more than five (5) inches (127mm) apart and securely fastened; or
2.2. Inside or outside iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch (3mm) material with not more than a two (2) inch (51mm) mesh and securely fastened.
3. If a side or rear window is of the type that can be opened, it shall, where applicable, be secured on the inside with either a slide bar, bolt, crossbar, auxiliary locking device, and/or padlock with hardened steel shackle and a minimum four pin tumbler operation.
4. The protective bars or grills shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are required to be openable by this Code.
15.8. Exterior Transoms. All exterior transoms exceeding ninety-six (96) square inches (61935mm
2) on the side and rear of any commercial building or premises used for business purposes shall be protected by one of the following:
1. Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing; or 309
392 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
20 2. The following barriers may be used but shall be secured with non- removable bolts:
2.1. Outside iron bars of at least one-half (½) inch (13mm) round or one by one-quarter (1 x 1/4) inch (25.4mm x 7mm) flat steel material, spaced no more than five (5) inches (127mm) apart and securely fastened; or
2.2. Outside iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch (3mm) with not more than a two (2) inches (51mm) mesh and securely fastened.
3. The protective bars or grills shall not interfere with the operation of opening the transoms if such transoms are required to be openable by this Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code.
15.9. Roof Openings. Roof openings of commercial buildings shall be equipped as follows:
1. All skylights on the roof of any building or premise used for business purposes shall be provided with:
1.1. Rated burglary resistant glazing; or
1.2. Iron bars of at least one-half (½) inch (13mm) round or one by one- fourth (1 x 1/4) inch (25.4mm x 7mm) flat steel material under the skylight and securely fastened; or
1.3. A steel grill of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch (3mm) material with a maximum two (2) inches (51mm) mesh under the skylight and securely fastened.
2. All hatchway openings on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be secured as follows:
310
393 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
21 2.1. If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the inside with at least sixteen (16) U.S. gauge sheet metal, or its equivalent, attached with screws.
2.2. The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts.
2.3. Outside hinges on all hatchway openings shall be provided with non- removable pins when using pin-type hinges.
3. All air duct or air vent openings exceeding ninety-six (96) square inches (61935mm
2) on the roof or exterior walls of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be secured by covering the same with either of the following:
3.1. Iron bars of at least one-half (½) inch (13mm) round or one by one- fourth (1 x 1/4) inch (25.4mm x 7mm) flat steel material spaced no more than five (5) inches (127mm) apart and securely fastened; or
3.2. Iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch (3mm) material with a maximum two (2) inches (51mm) mesh and securely fastened.
3.3. If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be secured with bolts which are non-removable from the exterior.
3.4. The above (3.1 and 3.2) must not interfere with venting requirements creating a potentially hazardous condition to health and safety or conflict with the provisions of this Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code.
Exceptions:
311
394 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
22 1. Air duct openings covered by mechanical equipment weighing more than 200 lbs. (890N) or sufficiently anchored with duct access(es) sufficiently secured.
2. A security system approved by the building official.
15.10. Permanent Ladders. Permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs of commercial buildings shall be fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten feet (3048mm). This covering shall be locked against the ladder with a case hardened hasp, secured with non- removable screws or bolts. Hinges on the cover will be provided with non-removable pins when using pin-type hinges. If a padlock is used, it shall have a hardened steel shackle, locking at both heel and toe, and a minimum five pin tumbler operation with non-removable key when in an unlocked position.
15.11. Address Numbers, Identifying Data, and Illumination. The following standards shall apply to lighting, address identification and parking areas:
1. The address number of every commercial building shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness so that it shall be easily visible from the street. The numerals in these numbers shall be no less than six (6) inches (153mm) in height and be of a color contrasting to the background. In addition, any business which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway or parking lot shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building.
2. All exterior commercial doors, during the hours of darkness, shall be illuminated with a minimum of one (1) footcandle (10.796 lux) of light. All exterior bulbs shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant covers. 312
395 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
23 3. Parking structures, open parking lots and access thereto, providing more than ten parking spaces and for use by the general public, shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one (1) footcandle (10.769 lux) of light on the parking surface from dusk until the termination of business every operating day.
16. Performance Testing.
16.1. Responsibility of Owner. It shall be the responsibility of the owner or his or designated agent, of a building or structure falling within the provisions of this Volume, to provide the enforcing authority with a written specification performance test report indicating that the materials utilized meet the minimum requirements.
16.2. Proof of Compliance. Whenever there is sufficient evidence of compliance with the provisions of this Volume or evidence that any material or any construction does not conform to the requirements of this Volume, or in order to substantiate claims for alternate materials or methods of construction, the enforcing authority may require tests as proof of compliance to be made at the expense of the owner or his agent by any agency which is approved by the enforcing authority.
16.3. Verification. Specimens shall be representative, and the construction shall be verified by assembly drawings and bill of materials. Two complete sets of manufacturer or fabricator installation instructions and full-size or accurate scale templates for all items and hardware shall be included. 313
396 of 606
Attachment 9_[5] GBSC_2023_Volume VII
24 16.4. Testing Methods. The enforcing authority shall establish and adopt testing methods which shall substantially meet the minimum standards in the most recent edition of the California Building Code.
314
397 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
1 VOLUME VIII.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE CODE
SECTION VIII-1. Volume VIII of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby adopted to read as follows:
10. PURPOSE. The Council of the City of Glendale has determined that the economic vitality of the City is directly impacted by the visual character and physical condition of its commercial and industrial neighborhoods. It is the purpose of this code to provide minimum standards for maintenance of properties in these districts, improve community appearance, and to protect the public health, safety and welfare of individuals who live, work, shop and/or operate business within and surrounding these districts.
The goals of this code are to promote an attractive business community that will help serve the economic and social interests of the City, to enhance the value of all commercial and industrial property and promote the overall economic development within the City by preventing commercial and industrial properties from becoming blighted resulting in diminution in the enjoyment, use, and property values of properties in and around the commercial and industrial areas. In adopting this code, it is the Council's intention to set forth maintenance standards for commercial and industrial properties.
20. SCOPE. The standards set forth in this code shall apply to all lots and parcels in all commercial and industrial zoning districts, as defined in Title 30 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 ("GMC") and all structures located on such real property.
30. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this code, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:
315
398 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
2 "COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING AREAS" shall be as defined by Title 30 of the GMC or as a "condition of approval" of a discretionary action in any commercial, commercial/industrial or industrial zone.
"VISUALLY OPAQUE" shall mean material that does not allow the viewing of images through it.
40. AUTHORIZATION. The building official or his or her designee(s) is authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of this code. For such purposes the building official shall have the powers of a law enforcement officer. The building official shall have the power to render interpretations of this code and to adopt and enforce rules and supplemental regulations in order to clarify the application of its provisions.
50. MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY, GENERALLY. All property, buildings and structures or portions thereof shall be maintained in clean, and neat condition, in good repair and free of graffiti.
It is unlawful and deemed a public nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying or managing any commercial, commercial/industrial or industrial zoned property to maintain property contrary to this code.
60. SUBSTANDARD PROPERTY. Any building, structure or portion thereof which is determined to be an unsafe building in accordance with Chapter 1 Division II Section 116, Volume IA, Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2020; or any building or portion thereof, or the premises on which the same is located, in which there exists any of the following listed conditions shall be deemed and hereby is declared to be a substandard building and a violation of this code:
316
399 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
3 1. Any building, structure or portion thereof that is dilapidated, dangerous, abandoned, partially destroyed, or unsafe as defined in the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, resulting from decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, fire, wind, earthquake, flood old age or neglect, inadequate exits, human or mechanical damage, or improper occupancy;
2. Any building, structure or portions thereof on which the condition of the paint has become so deteriorated as to permit decay, excessive checking, cracking, peeling, chalking, dry rot, warping, or termite infestation;
3. Any building, structure, wall or fence on which graffiti has been placed which is visible from a public street;
4. Any premises, building or portions thereof that are unsanitary. Unsanitary conditions shall include, but not be limited to, infestation of insects, vermin or rodents, rubbish, trash or debris maintained in any doorway or vestibule, lack of adequate garbage and rubbish storage and removal facilities, and/or lack of or improper connection to required sewage disposal system;
5. All electrical service to any electrical wiring devices, appliance, or equipment which is found to be dangerous to life or property because they are defective or improperly installed or used;
6. Plumbing which was installed in violation of GMC requirements in effect a t the time of installation or which has not been maintained in a sanitary and safe operating condition;
7.a. All mechanical systems, materials and appurtenances, both existing and new equipment which were installed in violation of the code edition under which 317
400 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
4 installed and/or not maintained in proper operating condition in accordance with the original design and in a safe and hazard free condition. b. Screening devices used to obstruct the view of such devices which are not maintained in a clean and neat condition;
c. Any equipment and/or screening device or part thereof that is defective, broken, damaged, or weathered;
8. Any building or portions thereof which has faulty weather protection which shall include, but not be limited to, deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors, parapets, including broken windows or doors, defective or lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings, including lack of paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering, or broken, rotted, split, or buckled exterior wall coverings or roof coverings and damaged or non-functioning drainage structures;
9. Any building, premises or portions thereof, device, apparatus, equipment, combustible waste or vegetation which is in such a condition as to cause a fire or explosion or provide a ready fuel to augment the spread and intensity of fire or explosion arising from any cause; or
10. Except as provided in Title 30 of the GMC, the accumulation of weeds, vegetation, junk, abandoned or inoperable motor vehicles, dead organic matter, debris, garbage, offal, rat harborages, stagnant water, combustible materials or similar materials on a premises or property;
11. Inadequate or inoperative night and security lighting on a premises or property. 318
401 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
5 70. DECLARATION OF SUBSTANDARD PROPERTY. Whenever the building official or his or her designee(s) finds that a substandard condition(s) exist on any property covered by this code, he or she shall declare the building, structure, and/or premises as substandard and require the owner to complete repairs, removal or clearing of such condition(s) within the time set forth in a notification to the property owner of the substandard conditions. All notices and orders to the property owner shall be issued and recorded pursuant to Chapter 11, Volume V, Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023.
80. VACANT OR UNOCCUPIED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES. Vacant or unoccupied buildings or structures, and the property on which they are constructed, shall be continuously maintained to the standards set forth in this code.
90. PREMISES, GENERALLY. Premises of commercial, commercial/industrial and industrial zoned properties shall be maintained free of dirt, litter and debris.
Entryways, porticos, alcoves and ve stibules shall be maintained free of dirt, litter and debris.
Windows and window displays shall be clean. Temporary window signs and display materials as permitted by Title 30 of the GMC which have become faded, torn or in disrepair are prohibited.
Awnings must be in good repair. Awnings which are faded or torn or on which lettering is becoming detached, faded or in poor repair are prohibited.
A violation of Section 90 shall be deemed an infraction punishable as provided in Section 1.20 and 1.24 of the GMC.
319
402 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
6 100. CONSTRUCTION SITES. Work must proceed in a timely manner pursuant to Chapter 1 Division II Section 105.5, Volume IA of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023.
The accumulation of dirt, litter, debris, and equipment in or on the adjoining street, and/or sidewalk during construction shall be prohibited, unless otherwise permitted pursuant to a City of Glendale permit.
110. SIGNS. All signs and sign structures erected or placed on properties within the Commercial and Manufacturing Zones shall be maintained in a good and safe structural condition, shall be painted on all exterior parts at least as often as required to prevent fading, chipping, peeling and rusting, and shall be maintained in good condition and appearance as specified in Section 30.33 of the GMC.
A violation of Section 110 shall be deemed an infraction punishable as provided in Section 1.20 and 1.24 of the GMC.
120. LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. All planting material and planting beds shall be permanently maintained in a clean, orderly and healthy manner at all times, pursuant to requirements set forth in Title 30 of the GMC. Any landscaping that is not in a healthy or living state shall be replaced. If a landscape plan is part of any City approval, the replacement of such planting material shall be in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. Proposals to modify an approved landscaping plan, which has been in effect for more than two years, may be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development, without the necessity of returning to the Design Review Board or other permitting authority. For those commercial or industrial properties within a redevelopment project area, any of the modifications under the 320
403 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
7 conditions set forth above, may be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development.
No landscaping shall be permitted in areas where such landscaping in any way endangers the health, or public safety by creating a traffic hazard, by obstructing vision, or which is detrimental or harmful to the use of surrounding properties.
All irrigation systems shall be maintained in good repair and working condition.
Said systems shall be adjusted so as not to spray across or into any sidewalk, driveway, and/or street.
Violation of Section 120 shall be deemed an infraction punishable as provided in section 1.20 and 1.24 of the GMC.
130. PARKWAYS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. All sidewalks and parkways located adjacent to and adjoining commercial or industrial properties shall be maintained free of junk, trash, debris, litter, painted or inked survey marks (after the work is completed or work in connection therewith), appliances, furniture, overgrown and unpruned privately owned trees and shrubs, weeds and grass in excess of six (6) inches in height, by the owner or the responsible party in control of such property. Landscaping in parkways shall be permanently maintained in a clean, orderly and healthy manner at all times, pursuant to requirements set forth in Chapter 8.32 of the GMC. 140. PARKING SPACES, LOTS AND STRUCTURES. All parking lots and structures and their surfaces shall be maintained in a clean, and neat condition and in good repair free of junk, trash, debris, litter, weeds, appliances, furniture, and abandoned or inoperable motor vehicles. All drainage structures shall be maintained and operable and free of standing water. All parking stalls shall be clearly identified with paint or 321
404 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
8 other approved striping materials on the surface of the parking area. All parking lot improvements, including the striping of stalls, appropriate signing and lighting, shall be permanently maintained pursuant to Chapter 30.32 of the GMC.
The following conditions or activities are prohibited:
1. The repair or servicing of any type of vehicles in any parking lot or structure, except as expressly permitted by the GMC;
2. The use of required parking spaces during regular business hours, for storage of commercial or other vehicles, including but not limited to, busses, trailers, recreational vehicles, boats and motor homes, except as otherwise expressly permitted by the GMC, or as incident to the use permitted on the site;
3. Vehicles of any type, parked or stored for sale on any parking lot or vacant parcel except in conjunction with a bona fide vehicle sales agency.
A violation of section 140 shall be deemed an infraction punishable as provided in Section 1.20 and 1.24 of the GMC.
150. LOADING AREAS. All loading areas must be maintained free and clear of junk, trash, debris, appliances, furniture or any other items. Loading areas shall be maintained in a clean and neat condition, free of any refuse that might attract or harbor rodents, vermin and/or insects.
160. OUTSIDE STORAGE AREAS. Except as provided in Title 30 of the GMC, there shall be no outside storage of tools, equipment, supplies, materials or merchandise at any time in any commercial or commercial/industrial zoning district. Temporary sheds, tents, awnings and the like are prohibited.
322
405 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
9 170. REFUSE CONTAINERS AND STORAGE AREAS. Refuse storage containers and enclosures shall be maintained in the following manner:
1. All refuse and refuse containers shall be stored within an approved storage area or within an enclosed building;
2. All refuse storage areas shall be maintained in a clean and neat manner and refuse shall not project above the height of said enclosure; and
3. All refuse storage areas shall be readily accessible to the users they serve as well as for collection operations.
4. All refuse containers shall be maintained so as to be free of graffiti. All refuse containers shall be securely covered, maintained in good repair, with no jagged or torn metal, and sealed so as not to leak liquid waste.
180. UNIMPROVED PROPERTY. Unimproved real property in any commercial, commercial/industrial or industrial zoning district shall be maintained in such a manner so as to not be a detriment to other nearby properties and not adversely affect the public's health, safety and welfare. Unimproved property shall be maintained in a clean and neat manner free of junk, trash, debris, litter, abandoned or inoperable vehicles, stagnant water, abandoned excavations, appliances and furniture, vegetation that is not in a healthy or living state and overgrown vegetation. Living vegetation shall be maintained so as not to exceed an overall height of six (6) inches except for trees and shrubs that are exempt from this requirement. Vehicles of any type shall not be parked or stored for sale on any parking lot or vacant or unimproved parcel except in conjunction with a bona fide vehicle sales agency.
323
406 of 606
Attachment 10_[6]_GBSC_2023_Volume VIII
10 190. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS AVAILABLE. Nothing in this code shall be deemed to prevent the City from beginning a civil, criminal and/or administrative proceeding to abate the public nuisance or from pursuing the above remedies individually or collectively or pursuing any other means available to the City under the provisions of applicable ordinances or State law or as alternatives to or in conjunction with the proceedings herein set forth.
200. VIOLATIONS. Unless otherwise stated, the owner or other entity having charge or control of any structure or real property located in a commercial or industrial zoning district who maintains such structure or real property in violation of the provisions of this article is guilty of a misdemeanor.
324
407 of 606
Attachment 11_[7] GBSC_2023_Volume IX
1 VOLUME IX. GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS
SECTION IX-1. Volume IX of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is amended as hereinafter provided.
SECTION IX-2. Section 301.1 of Volume IX of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby amended to read as follows:
301.1 Scope. Buildings and structures shall be designed to include the green building measures specified as mandatory in this code. Voluntary green building measures are also included in this code and may be included in the design and construction of structures covered by this code, but are not required unless adopted by a city, county, or city and county as specified in Section 101.7.
SECTION IX-3. Section 4.106.5 of Volume IX of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows:
4.106.5 Water permeable surfaces. Permeable paving is utilized for the parking, walking or patio surfaces in compliance with the following.
Not less than 20 percent of the total on-grade, residential uncovered parking, walking or patio surfaces shall be permeable.
Exceptions:
1. The primary driveway, primary entry walkway and entry porch or landing shall not be included when calculating the area required to be a permeable surface.
325
408 of 606
Attachment 11_[7] GBSC_2023_Volume IX
2 2. Required accessible routes for persons w ith disabilities as required by California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 11A and/or Chapter 11B as applicable.
SECTION IX- 4 Section 4.509 Volume IX of the Glendale Building and Safety Code, 2023, is hereby added to read as follows:
SECTION 4.509
NATURAL LIGHT AND VENTILATION
4.509.1 Natural light. The minimum net glazed area shall not be less than 10 percent of the floor area of the room served.
4.509.2 Natural ventilation. The minimum openable area to the outdoors shall be 5 percent of the floor area being ventilated.
Passed by four-fi fths (4/5ths) vote of the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of _________________, 2024.
___________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
326
409 of 606
Attachment 11_[7] GBSC_2023_Volume IX
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, SUZIE ABAJIAN, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No._________ was passed by a four-fifths (4/5ths) vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the __________ day of _________________, 2024, and that the same was passed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
___________________________________
City Clerk
327
410 of 606
8a
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Introduction of the Ordinance Authorizing Issuance of Electric Revenue Bonds.
1. Ordinance authorizing issuance of Electric Revenue Bonds 2024 Second Series.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for May 21, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Glendale Water and Power’s (GWP) financial plan intends to issue revenue bonds in three tranches of approximately $166 million each. The first tranche of $166.9 million was issued in February 2024, the second tranche is expected to be issued in August 2024, and the third tranche is expected to be issued in August 2025. The funds will be used primarily to support the Grayson Repowering Project, as well as provide funding as necessary for the Scholl Biogas Renewable Generation Project, City-Owned Solar Projects, and certain distribution system improvements as they relate to the City’s Zero-Carbon Energy initiatives.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the herein-requested actions to authorize staff to proceed with the preparation and issuance of the Electric Revenue Bonds 2024 Second Series by introducing the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of the bonds.
411 of 606
28d
5 0
4 4
ANALYSIS
GWP is currently in the process of constructing the Grayson Repowering Project, the Scholl Canyon Landfill Biogas Renewable Generation Project, and to acquire and/or construct, as necessary, certain improvements to the City’s electric public utility, such as 4kV to 12kV feeder upgrades, solar generation facilities installed on city properties, substation improvements, meter upgrades, vault replacement and transmission and distribution improvements and pole replacements. As GWP does not have unrestricted cash reserves to fund these efforts and they cannot be funded through operations alone, GWP proposes to issue debt in the form of electric revenue bonds. GWP intends to issue approximately $500 million of revenue bonds. The first issuance of $166.9 million closed in February 2024, and the next issue is scheduled to close in August 2024. The third issuance is planned to close in August of 2025.
Additionally, the electric revenue bonds will provide funds to make a deposit to a debt service reserve fund, and to pay the costs of issuance of the New Money Bonds. The maximun debt service is projected to increase to approximately $32.7 million after the second bond issuance and projected to increase to approximately $42.9 million after the third bond issuance.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
The issuance of the revenue bonds is projected to increase interest cost approximately $4.0 million in fiscal year 2025, and issuance costs are estimated to be $500,000.
Future expenses have been requested as part of the annual budget process.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable for the action requested as the action does not involve a project for the purposes of California Environmental Quality Act.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Choose not to authorize the actions requested and recommended in this report, in which case the second series of bonds will not be issued and several capital projects including, but not limited to, the Grayson Repowering Project will need to be suspended.
Alternative 2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. 412 of 606
38d
5 0
4 4
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Mark Young, General Manager - Glendale Water and Power
Prepared by:
Scott K. Mellon, Assistant General Manager - Power Management Adrine Isayan, Assistant General Manager - Finance and Risk Management David Davis, Utility Finance Manager
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
None.
413 of 606
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $230,000,000
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF CITY OF GLENDALE
ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS, 2024 SECOND SERIES, PAYABLE OUT
OF THE ELECTRIC WORKS REVENUE FUND, AND APPROVING
CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XXVI of the Charter (the “Charter”) of the City of Glendale, California (the “City”), the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) is authorized to provide for the issuance of revenue bonds for the purpose of providing moneys for the financing or refinancing of the acquisition or construction of additions to, or extensions or improvements of, the municipal electric system of the City (the “Electric System”) by ordinance authorizing the issuance of such revenue bonds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XXVI of the Charter, the City now proposes to issue its Electric Revenue Bonds, 2024 Second Series (the “Bonds”) pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of February 1, 2000 (the “Original Indenture”), by and between the City and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor to The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”), as supplemented and amended, including as supplemented by an Tenth Supplement to Indenture of Trust, dated as of August 1, 2024 (the “Tenth Supplement”), by and between the City and the Trustee, to provide moneys for (i) paying all or a portion of the costs (a) to further develop and to construct the Grayson Repowering Project, consisting of natural gas- powered electric generating facilities that will replace certain portions of the City’s existing Grayson Power Plant, with a total capacity of approximately 56 megawatts (three reciprocating internal combustion engines rated at 18.6 megawatts each) and a 75 megawatt/300 megawatt-hour battery energy storage system, (b) to acquire and construct the Scholl Canyon Landfill Biogas Renewable Generation Project, consisting of the installation of four gas engine generators, along with a landfill gas cleanup system, and/or (c) to acquire and construct certain improvements to the City’s electric public utility, such as 4 to 12kv feeder upgrades, solar generation facilities installed on city properties, substation improvements, meter upgrades, vault replacement and transmission and distribution improvements and pole replacements, in each case including necessary and appurtenant facilities and equipment relating thereto, all to be owned by the City (collectively, the “Projects”), (ii) making a deposit to a debt service reserve fund, and (iii) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness of the City but shall constitute obligations which shall be payable as to both principal and interest only from the Electric Works Revenue Fund of the City, as provided in Section 20 of Article XI of the Charter; provided, however, that nothing shall preclude the payment of debt service on the Bonds from any premium or accrued interest received from the sale of the Bonds as provided in Subsection 4 of Section 4 of Article XXVI of the Charter; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is for the purpose of authorizing the issuance of the Bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Glendale:
414 of 606
- 2 -
Section 1. Authorization to Issue Bonds; Purposes; Principal Amount. (a) Pursuant to Article XXVI of the Charter, the City Council does hereby authorize to be issued, upon the terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth, the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $230,000,000 (or such lesser amount as shall be approved by the City Manager upon consultation with the Director of Finance, the execution of the Bonds constituting conclusive evidence of the City Manager’s approval of such principal amount) for the following objects and purposes: (A) developing, acquiring, constructing and installing the Projects, including any necessary and appurtenance facilities and equipment relating thereto; (B) making a deposit to a debt service reserve fund, if appropriate or necessary; and (C) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds.
(b) This Ordinance shall constitute complete authority to issue the Bonds pursuant to the Indenture of Trust, as provided herein. The Bonds shall be issued pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance, and more specifically in the Indenture of Trust.
Section 2. Date of Issuance; Maximum Interest Rate. The Bonds shall be issued on or about August 14, 2024 (or such other date as shall be acceptable to the City Manager upon consultation with the Director of Finance). The maximum interest rate to be payable on any maturity of Bonds shall not exceed six percent (6.0%) per annum.
Section 3. Maturity Dates. The Bonds shall mature (or be payable by sinking fund redemption) in each of the years 2025 through 2055, inclusive (or in such other years as shall be acceptable to the City Manager upon consultation with the Director of Finance). Subject to the preceding sentence, the Bonds shall mature and be payable on such dates as specifically set forth in the Tenth Supplement.
Section 4. Execution of Bonds. The Mayor and the Director of Finance are each hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds manually or by facsimile signature, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to attest such signatures by manual or facsimile signature. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the seal of the City to the Bonds by manual or facsimile impression thereon.
Section 5. Source of Payment. The Bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness of the City but shall constitute obligations which shall be payable as to both principal and interest only from the Electric Works Revenue Fund of the City, as provided in Section 20 of Article XI of the Charter; provided, however, that nothing shall preclude the payment of debt service on the Bonds from any premium or accrued interest received from the sale of the Bonds as provided in Subsection 4 of Section 4 of Article XXVI of the Charter.
Section 6. Official Action. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the City with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and the negotiation and execution of the agreements relating thereto are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. The City Manager, the Director of Finance, the City Treasurer, the City Clerk and any and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the City, to do any and all things and take any and all actions, including, without limitation, the execution and delivery of 415 of 606
- 3 -
any and all certificates, requisitions, agreements, policies (including one or more municipal bond insurance policies and one or more debt service reserve account policies) and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds.
Section 7. Provisions Necessary and Desirable. The provisions of this Ordinance are deemed necessary and desirable to facilitate the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds authorized by this Ordinance.
Section 8. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance to be published once in the Glendale Independent, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City.
Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the thirty-first (31 st) day after its passage.
Passed by the Council of the City of Glendale on the ___ day of ____________, 2024.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, DR. SUZIE ABAJIAN, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that Ordinance No. ______ was passed by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ____ day of ____________, 2024, and that same was passed by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
City Clerk
416 of 606
8b
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Police Department Mobile Command Post designed to provide emergency command and control without interruptions during large scale events to include natural disasters, preplanned events, critical incident response, and acts of domestic terrorism.
1.Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with LDV Specialty Vehicles for the design, engineering, and construction of a purpose-built Mobile Command Post in the amount not to exceed $1,885,620.
2.Resolution of appropriation.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for May 21, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Glendale Police Department currently has a 22-year-old Mobile Command Post (MCP) which has reached the end of its useful life. The current MCP does not have the technology or the space to be effectively used during police operations and is only used as a place of shelter.
The Police Department requires an advanced MCP, outfitted with technology and the space to effectively provide police services to the citizens of Glendale. The Police Department would utilize the MCP to manage critical incidents, acts of domestic terrorism, natural disasters and pre planned events.
In addition to the MCP supplementing and providing situational awareness to decision makers in the Police building, the MCP will be able to provide uninterrupted police services to the community should the Police Department building become inhabitable for any reason. The MCP will allow Command Staff, Managers and Supervisors to allocate resources, maintain situational awareness and to appropriately respond to calls for service. Dispatchers will have the ability to receive 911 calls, dispatch police personnel and communicate with partner agencies. It will also allow for video streaming to and from the Real Time Intelligence Center (RTIC) greatly increasing situational awareness.
417 of 606
28b
5 1
3 1
The MCP will be a single cab vehicle with an affixed 36’ chassis containing four slide outs, a segregated two-person dispatch area, four workstations, a conference room with an additional work station, additional seating, and an on board restroom accessed from the outside.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution to dispense with competitive bidding authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with LDV Specialty Vehicles for the design, engineering, and construction of a purpose-built Mobile Command Post in the amount not to exceed $1,885,620, and to approve the resolution of appropriation from the Asset Forfeiture Fund.
ANALYSIS
Mobile Command Post vehicles are specialty vehicles equipped with significant technology and hardware which must be easy to operate and must work when the equipment is deployed.
In 2023, the Police Department organized a committee to explore replacing the current MCP, which has reached its end of life. The committee, which is comprised of sworn and professional staff, visited local and regional partner agencies to determine best practices, explore new technologies and determine vendors in the market with the capability to deliver a MCP that meets the needs of our Police Department and community.
It became very clear that LDV Specialty Vehicles was the vendor who was used by almost every agency in the region and who has consistently delivered turnkey MCPs which have proven to have outstanding craftsmanship to include form, function, and technology.
Partner agencies who are currently using LDV built MCPs:
•Los Angeles Police Department
•Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
•Pasadena Police Department
•Beverly Hills Police Department
•Santa Monica Police Department
•Torrance Police Department
•Long Beach Police Department
•Riverside Sheriff’s Department
LDV is the largest supplier of custom specialty vehicles in North America with more than 20,000 vehicles delivered since 1977. Since 1995, LDV has delivered over 170 vehicles to agencies in the state of California alone. LDV has built units for some of the nation’s most respected police departments, sheriff’s offices, fire departments, Federal agencies, utilities, insurance companies, hospital groups, and commercial clients. This experience puts LDV in a unique position to focus on continuous improvements including innovative designs, materials, and technologies to improve user experience and vehicle 418 of 606
38b
5 1
3 1
performance.
LDV is on multiple cooperative contracts including The General Services Administration (GSA), Louisiana Multiple Award Schedule (LAMAS), BuyBoard National Purchasing Cooperative, New Jersey State Contract, and the Houston-Galveston Area Council (H- GAC). For LDV to sell on any of these contracts they had to go through a competitive bid process. The City will benefit by getting the same competitive pricing without having to complete a formal bid process.
LDV provides several important features that no other Mobile Command Post builder can offer.
•LDV Intel-I-Touch vehicle automation: LDV is the only manufacturer to offer a fully automated vehicle control system. All vital functions are controlled and monitored through the easy-to-navigate touch panel.
•The auto startup feature ensures the vehicle is always set up and taken down in the correct sequence, preventing possible damage to the electrical system or vehicle.
•Built-in redundancy eliminates the possibility of a system failure ensuring the vehicle will always be operational.
•Flat floor slide-out rooms: LDV is the only manufacturer to offer fully automatic flat floor slide-out rooms forward and aft of the rear axles. These slides drop down to flat floor height when deployed to prevent tripping hazards. •Stair system: LDV’s exclusive cassette stair system provides safe ingress and egress to the vehicle.
LDV has been awarded ISO 9001:2008 certification for design, fabrication, integration, upfit of emergency response and commercial specialty vehicles.
LDV stands by its products and responds to service call requests 24 hours a day. With specialized technical knowledge and unmatched expertise, LDV Service Team members speak directly with clients to trouble shoot any potential problem and provide immediate solutions. If onsite emergency service is needed, LDV can have a technician at your location within 24 hours.
All LDV vehicles come with Lifetime phone & e-mail service department assistance.
The mobile command post would then be outfitted with IT equipment, inclusive of dispatch consoles and radios. The breakdown of the project cost is below:
419 of 606
48b
5 1
3 1
Project Description Amount
Mobile Command Post $ 1,714,200
IT Equipment $ 255,000
Radios $ 82,734
Project Contingency $ 205,193
Total Cost $ 2,257,127
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable
FISCAL IMPACT
The Mobile Command Post project will cost $2,257,127. The Police Department has funded the project through the Asset Forfeiture Fund, Police Fund, and Wireless Fund through existing, requested, and future appropriations. The funding and appropriation requests are outlined below:
Existing Appropriation:
Amount Account String Funding Source
$1,155,000 GL: 51000-2600-GPD-0020-P0000-
PL: G65006
Asset Forfeiture Fund
$255,000 GL: 51000-2610-GPD-0020-P0000-
PL: GPD01162BG
Police Fund
Requesting Appropriation:
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$764,393 24211-2600-GPD-
0000
GL: 51000-2600-
GPD-0020-P0000-
PL: G65008
Asset Forfeiture
Fund
Future Appropriation – FY24-25 Proposed Budget:
Amount Account String Funding Source
$82,734 GL: 50600-6600-GPD-0020-P0000-
PL: TBD
Wireless Fund
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(a) as it has no potential for 420 of 606
58b
5 1
3 1
resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonable foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Even if it is a project, it is exempt pursuant to 14 C.C.R. § 15061(b)(3).
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Refer to Exhibit A.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council may elect not to award the contract as recommended herein. This would prohibit the Police Department from being able to provide emergency command and control without interruptions during large scale events to include natural disasters, preplanned events, critical incident response, and acts of domestic terrorism.
Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Manny Cid, Chief of Police
Prepared by:
Sean Riley, Police Lieutenant
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A – Campaign Disclosure
421 of 606
1 RESOLUTION NO. ______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER OR A DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH LDV
SPECIALITY VEHICLES FOR THE DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PURPOSE-BUILT MOBILE COMMAND POST.
WHEREAS, the Glendale Police Department (GPD) currently has a 22-year-old Mobile Command Post (MCP) which has reached the end of its useful life; WHEREAS, the current MCP does not have the technology or the space to be effectively used during police operations and is only used as a place of shelter; WHEREAS, GPD requires an advanced MCP, outfitted with technology and the space to effectively provide police services to the citizens of Glendale; WHEREAS, GPD would utilize the MCP to manage critical incidents, acts of domestic terrorism, natural disasters and pre-planned events.
WHEREAS, the MCP will be able to provide uninterrupted police services to the community should the Police Department building become inhabitable for any reason; WHEREAS, the MCP will allow Command Staff, Managers and Supervisors to allocate resources, maintain situational awareness and to appropriately respond to calls for service and allow Dispatchers to receive 911 calls, dispatch police personnel and communicate with partner agencies.
WHEREAS, GPD organized a committee, comprised of sworn and professional staff, which visited local and regional partner agencies to determine best practices, explore new technologies and determine vendors in the market with the capability to deliver a MCP that meets the needs of our Police Department and community; WHEREAS, LDV Specialty Vehicles was the vendor used by almost every agency in the region and who has consistently delivered turnkey MCPs which have proven to have outstanding craftsmanship to include form, function, and technology; WHEREAS, LDV has been awarded ISO 9001:2008 certification for design, fabrication, integration, upfit of emergency response and commercial specialty vehicles WHEREAS, LDV is the only manufacturer to offer a fully automated vehicle control system allowing all vital functions to be controlled and monitored through the easy-to-navigate touch panel;
422 of 606
2 WHEREAS, LDV is the only manufacturer to offer fully automatic flat floor slide- out rooms forward and aft of the rear axles which drop down to flat floor height when deployed to prevent tripping hazards.
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 9 of the City of Glendale Charter provides an exemption to competitive bidding where the City Council determines it is in the best interests of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and WHEREAS, LDV Specialty Vehicles is the only source from which to obtain a Mobile Command Post with all of the features needed as well as state of the art technology as set forth above.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
1. That the foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct and a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding and the Council hereby finds that it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding.
2. That the City Manager or a designee is authorized to execute an agreement with LDV Specialty Vehicles for the design, engineering, and construction of a purpose-built Mobile Command Post.
Adopted this day of , 2024.
____________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, SUZIE ABAJIAN, Ph.D, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2024, and that same was adopted by the following vote:
423 of 606
3 Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
_____________________
City Clerk
424 of 606
425 of 606
426 of 606
427 of 606
8c
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project Construction Contract Alternatives
1. Resolution rejecting all bids received for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, adopting updated Plans and Specification for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, Specification No. 3829R, and Plan Nos. 1-3071, 3-1572, 4- 649, 4-650, 18-114, 49-247, 50-638, 50-639, 50-648, 50-672, 50-673, 50-698, 50- 699, and 70-113; and directing the City Clerk to re-advertise for bids.
2) Motion awarding a construction contract to Toro Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $15,433,821, approving a 10 percent contract contingency in the amount of $1,543,382, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the contract.
3) Resolution of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $14,797,447 for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for May 21, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project is designed to add new corridor safety improvements, including new traffic control devices, new street pavement, new bicycle facilities, creative crosswalks, stormwater infiltration systems, sewer capacity improvements, and traffic signal improvements in the project area, many of which were requested by the public at numerous community meetings regarding the project scope.
The city received five bids for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project. However, because of the increased cost of the project due in part to the integration of numerous multimodal transportation improvements, staff has identified additional external funding that had not been previously allocated for the project. Rebidding the project will free up $3 million in funds that can be used for other multimodal transportation projects in Glendale.
The intent of this item is for the City Council to either, reject all bids to allow staff to modify the project to utilize the additional source of funding for the construction phase of the 428 of 606
28c
5 1
5 4
project, or the City Council may instead choose to forgo this additional funding and award a construction contract to the lowest, responsible bidder, Toro Enterprise, Inc. in the amount of $15,433,821.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution rejecting all bids received for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, adopting the updated project Plans and Specification, and authorizing the City Clerk to re-advertise for bids.
ANALYSIS
As part of the Public Works Department’s (PWD) ongoing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) efforts to improve the condition of the city’s roadways, the plans and specification have been prepared for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project. Additionally, the Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) adopted by City Council in 2012, identifies La Crescenta Avenue as a study corridor for roadway repurposing and the implementation of bicycle infrastructure improvements. To proceed with the development of the project plans, a Traffic Corridor Study (TCS) was conducted to study the existing conditions of the roadway segments to determine the feasibility of incorporating various active transportation improvements within the project limits. The TCS studied the feasibility of repurposing the roadway and modifying travel lanes to implement new bicycle facilities, utilizing a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis, as well as level of service (LOS) analyses for intersection operations to gain additional insight into the roadway realignment efforts.
The study resulted in various design alternatives that were shared with the community and various stakeholders over multiple engagement events with the purpose of selecting a design alternative that could accomplish the project’s main goals.
At the October 18, 2022, meeting, the City Council voted 4-1 to recommend Alternative 1 for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, which included the removal of one trave lane in each direction, the installation of a center two-way left turn lane, and the installation of various types of dedicated bicycle lanes. Based on the analysis of this alternative by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., it was determined that this roadway repurposing effort would enhance corridor safety and provide better connectivity. It was also projected to result in an estimated reduction of 92 collisions over a 20-year period on La Crescenta Avenue.
Furthermore, there are intermittent left-turn pockets only at intersections along La Crescenta Avenue that serve one direction of traffic, and the installation of a two-way left turn lane would provide a continuous lane that would allow drivers to pull out of the travel lane to initiate and end left-turns, potentially reducing multiple conflict points that exist without a two-way left turn lane, such as turning maneuvers, head-on collisions, and predominantly rear-end collisions. The installation of bicycle lanes would decrease VMT by introducing new active transportation means, and culmination of all these improvements would also potentially decrease speeds along this corridor. At the February 6, 2024 meeting, the City Council voted 5-0 to adopt plans and specification for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project including the multimodal transportation improvements included in Alternative 1.
429 of 606
38c
5 1
5 4
Project Location
The project is located on La Crescenta Avenue between North Verdugo Road and Montrose Avenue. Land uses along the project consists of a mix of commercial facilities, single family, and multifamily homes.
The project scope of work includes the following:
•Selective removal/reconstruction of deteriorated pavement and placement of asphalt concrete pavement;
•Resurfacing of 1.7 centerline miles of street pavement; •Selective removal, repair, and reconstruction of approximately 4,900 linear feet of damaged curbs and gutters, and 44,500 square feet of sidewalks, driveways, cross gutters, alley aprons, and local depressions;
•Construction and modification of 59 curb ramps to meet ADA guidelines; •Upsize of approximately 3,000 linear feet of sanitary sewer main and 200 linear feet of sanitary sewer repairs and lining;
•Adjustment of existing manholes, utility valves, and water meters to finished grade; •Planting of 21 new street trees;
•Realignment of six intersections;
•Modification of existing traffic signals at four intersections; •Removal and replacement of existing traffic striping and pavement markings; •Repurposing a travel lane in each direction and installation of center two-way left turn lane;
•Installation of ten drywell and three bio-retention facilities; •Installation of new reflective pavement on Paloma Avenue between La Crescenta Avenue and Downing Avenue;
•Installation of four creative crosswalks;
•Installation of fiber optic infrastructure at various locations; •Installation of a new traffic signal at the intersection of La Crescenta Avenue and Oakmont View Drive;
•Installation of a new pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) at the intersection of La Crescenta Avenue and Piedmont Avenue;
•Installation of a new mid-block signalized bicycle crossing on La Crescenta Avenue between Las Palmas Avenue and Arlington Avenue, and
•Traffic Signal Modifications at the following intersections:
a. La Crescenta Avenue and Montrose Avenue
b. La Crescenta Avenue and Honolulu Avenue
c. La Crescenta Avenue and Shirlyjean Street
d. La Crescenta Avenue and Roselawn Avenue
•Installation of 11,500 linear feet of new class IV protected bicycle lanes and 5,500 linear feet of new class II bicycle lanes;
•Installation of bicycle friendly catch basin surface grates. 430 of 606
48c
5 1
5 4
Pavement Rehabilitation
The project will resurface the entire project corridor, which involves the rehabilitation of existing street pavement that has deteriorated beyond normal maintenance work. It typically consists of the removal of the top 2-inches of existing Asphalt Concrete (AC) pavement, followed by the placement of 2-inches of ARHM pavement wearing surface.
This method of street resurfacing improves the ride of the roadway, and the structural integrity of the pavement, and begins a new service life for the street.
Intersection Realignments
As part of any major CIP project, PWD evaluates existing intersection conditions to identify pedestrian mobility and safety improvements. To take advantage of economies of scale, PWD includes realignment and improvements of previously identified deficient intersections to upcoming CIP projects.
Intersection realignments as part of this project include extending curb configurations, shortening crosswalk lengths, removal of slip lanes, installation of new ADA-compliant curb ramps, and installation of new signing and striping.
Tree Plantings
A total of 21 new street trees will be planted in vacant locations to infill the street canopy and expand the urban forest as part of this project along the entire corridor on La Crescenta Avenue between North Verdugo Road and Montrose Avenue.
Creative Crosswalks
PWD is working with the Library, Arts, and Culture Department, which has procured an artist through an RFP process to design the creative crosswalks throughout the project corridor. The creative crosswalks will be installed at the following intersections as part of this project:
1. La Crescenta Avenue and Piedmont Avenue;
2. La Crescenta Avenue and Shirlyjean Street;
3. La Crescenta Avenue and Oakmont View Drive;
4. La Crescenta Avenue and Roselawn Avenue.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The proposed project includes improvements that will comply with the current Federal ADA guidelines.
Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle infrastructure improvements will be installed at the following locations:
•Curb-running Class IV protected bicycle lane on southbound La Crescenta Avenue between Sycamore Avenue and North Verdugo Road;
•Curb-running Class IV protected bicycle lane on northbound La Crescenta Avenue between Glenwood Avenue and North Verdugo Road;
431 of 606
58c
5 1
5 4
•Class II bicycle lane on southbound La Crescenta Avenue between Montrose Avenue and Sycamore Avenue, and
•Class II bicycle lane on northbound La Crescenta Avenue between Montrose Avenue and Glenwood Avenue.
Competitive Bidding Process
On March 27, 2024, the city received five bids from contractors as follows:
1. Toro Enterprises, Inc. $15,433,820.70
2. PALP Inc. DBA Excel Paving Company $15,672,344.00
3. Nationwide Contracting Services, Inc. $16,742,130.44
4. All American Asphalt $16,793,435.60
5. C.A. Rasmussen, Inc. $17,735,119.82
However, after a detailed evaluation of the bids and due to the increased costs over the engineer’s estimate associated with the multimodal improvements – including the pedestrian hybrid beacons, new traffic signal installation, creative crosswalks, protected bicycle lane, and bicycle signal crossing – staff has identified additional Measure R funding that was not previously allocated for the project. This is because the initial release of plans and specification did not lineup with the biannual schedule where Metro receives requests for funding. Staff has confirmed with Metro that this additional funding could be considered at the July 2024 Board Meeting and the additional items may be eligible after rebid and approval by the board.
The updated engineer’s estimate for the construction of this project is between $15,000,000 and $17,000,000, which has been revised down favorably from between $17,000,000 and $19,000,000 when the project was advertised for bids. This can potentially be due to the project being more accurately costed by contractors on actual market rates and conditions. The recommended action will allow staff to pursue additional Measure R funding from Metro for the additional multimodal improvements, and therefore, save $3 million dollars in State Gas Tax and Measure M funds that could be directed towards other high priority multimodal capital improvement projects throughout the City.
Consequently, in the city's best interest and following consultation with the City Attorney’s office, staff recommends rejecting all current bids, updating the project plans and specifications to ensure compliance with the new funding criteria, and re-advertising the project. This approach will allow the city to receive bids that can utilize the additional funding for the multimodal improvements.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
In August of 2020, staff conducted a virtual public hearing regarding the removal of an existing crosswalk at the intersection of La Crescenta Avenue and Roselawn Avenue.
The public hearing was broadcast on the city’s YouTube channel. During the public hearing, the public was informed of the reasoning for the removal of the unused crosswalk, and was given the opportunity to ask questions and provide comments, and 432 of 606
68c
5 1
5 4
no objection was filed with the city for the removal of the crosswalk at the south leg of the intersection that leads to an in-accessible area alongside the Verdugo Wash.
Moreover, on February 17, 2022, at approximately 60% project design completion, a virtual community presentation was conducted after approximately 2,100 notifications were sent to property owners and occupants along the project limits notifying them of the meeting and encouraging their participation, which was broadcast on the city’s YouTube channel. During the meeting, the public was informed of the project details, bicycle infrastructure alternatives, construction schedule, future city and contractor notifications, and the impacts of construction work in the neighborhood. After briefing the City Council on the project status and the community meetings, staff was directed to gain additional community input for the critical facility alternative choices. Therefore, staff conducted supplemental outreach to impacted residents, community groups, merchant and community associations, a neighboring town council, and chambers of commerce over the course of six months.
During the project design phase, staff held two general project overview meetings, five in person meetings and five virtual meetings, in addition to two email campaigns, and provided multiple social media and website updates regarding this project.
Staff understands there are always concerns raised regarding the receipt of notifications for project presentations and events. We are committed to a transparent and effective communication strategy and are currently reviewing our notification process to ensure that all stakeholders receive timely and accurate information. This includes potentially increasing the notification radius and using a hand delivery service instead of a mailing service. We also invite any individuals or groups who did not receive a notification to contact our project team directly, so we can provide them with the necessary information and include them in future communications. Feedback is crucial to our efforts, and we are committed to enhancing communication with all community members.
Transportation and Parking Commission (TPC)
On August 18, 2022, staff presented this project to the TPC. The project details were shared, including the bicycle facility alternatives, outreach efforts as of the TPC meeting date, and next steps. The commission then brought forward a motion to support the bicycle lane installation alternative, and voted 3-1 in support of the motion, however, one of the commissioners voting in support of the motion asked for even more outreach to occur. Furthermore, the TPC determined that the selected alternative will further improve safety and active transportation for various modes of travel throughout the corridor and serve the project goals.
City Council
On October 18, 2022, staff presented this project to the City Council. The project details were shared, including the bicycle facility alternatives, outreach efforts as of the City Council meeting date, and next steps. The City Council approved the motion to support the alternative proposed by city staff and recommended by the TPC, which includes the removal of one travel lane in each direction, installation of a center two-way left turn lane, 433 of 606
78c
5 1
5 4
and installation of Class II and Class IV bicycle facilities along La Crescenta Avenue.
In addition, on March 8, 2023, at approximately 90% project design completion, an in- person community presentation was conducted after approximately 22,300 notifications were sent to property owners and occupants within the zip codes of 91208, 91214, and 91020, notifying them of the meeting and encouraging their participation. 60 people attended the meeting, during which, the public was informed on the final project details, bicycle infrastructure alternative, construction schedule, future city and contractor notifications, and impacts of construction work in their neighborhood. As part of the community feedback, staff incorporated the installation of bio-retention facilities, intersection realignments at various locations, and other infrastructure improvements to promote multimodal transportation and improve overall corridor safety. Additionally, key elements of the project, such as travel lane removals and center two-way left turn lane installations will be emphasized in upcoming community notifications, which was a request from the community.
In summary, and to date, PWD has conducted two general project overview meetings, an additional five in-person meetings, five virtual meetings, two email campaigns, and multiple social media informational updates. We have reached out to multiple stakeholders for this project and presented to any group or organization from the community who accepted our invitation to speak to them to publicize the project details to as many impacted stakeholders as possible. Feedback received throughout the process included in-person comments, emails, and phone calls. Additionally, the Glendale Police Department and the Montrose Verdugo City Chamber of Commerce conducted outreach events to connect with various community stakeholders. They used their extensive outreach capabilities and audience network to send out an email postcard that highlighted the project, provided resources for further information, included contact details, and encouraged community feedback. By tapping into their established email networks, we were able to significantly expand the reach and effectiveness of our project communication.
Approximately one month before the commencement of construction, staff will prepare a notification postcard, also know as the Director of Public Works’ Letter, containing essential project details including a link to the project website. The postcard will be hand delivered to residences and businesses that will be affected by the construction.
Additionally, the contractor will be responsible for distributing two distinct door hangers to the affected addresses. One set of door hangers will be provided two weeks prior to the start of any construction activity within the project area, while the second set will be distributed three days before construction begins.
Outreach on this project continues to occur through a dedicated website for the project.
The link to this website will be posted on all project outreach notifications such as project signs, postcards, and door hangers. The website page introduces the public to the project and to the project team, explains the scope of work and project locations, and provides the public with staff contact information for questions, discussion, and/or input. 434 of 606
88c
5 1
5 4
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with rejecting all bids and adopting the new plans and specification.
In the event the City Council chooses to approve Alternative 1 to staff’s recommendation and award a construction contract for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, it will cost $17,748,894, a portion of which is included in the FY 2023-24 budget. Therefore, if the City Council chooses this alternative, staff requests an appropriation of $14,797,447 from the State Gas Tax, Measure R Regional Return, Measure M Local Return, Measure W, and Sewer funds. The appropriation request is outlined below:
Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$1,980,936 GL: 52100-4020-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD000101N
State Gas Tax Fund
$970,511 GL: 52100-2550-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD000101G
Measure R Regional
Return Fund
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$6,720,017 GL: 24219-4020-
PWD-0000-P0000
GL: 52100-4020-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD000101N
State Gas Tax
Fund
$79,520 GL: 25300-2550-
PWD-0000-P0000
GL: 52100-2550-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD000101G
Measure R
Regional Return
Fund
$297,403 GL: 43110-2220-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00594AN
GL: 43110-2220-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101CN
Measure M Local
Return Fund
$1,182,360 GL: 24212-2220-
PWD-0000-P0000
GL: 52100-2220-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL:PWD00101CN
Measure M Local
Return Fund
$1,762,856 GL: 24218-2260-
PWD-0000-P0000
GL: 52100-2260-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101DN
Measure W Fund
$2,283,291 GL: 27900-5250-
PWD-0000-P0000
GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101EN
Sewer Fund
$400,000 GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: 52109
GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101EN
Sewer Fund
$850,000 GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00849AA
GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101EN
Sewer Fund
$184,000 GL: 52100-5250- GL: 52100-5250- Sewer Fund
435 of 606
98c
5 1
5 4
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01038AA
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101EN
$1,038,000 GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01040AA
GL: 52100-5250-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00101EN
Sewer Fund
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Project is categorically exempt from environmental review of CEQA guidelines §§ 15301.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Approve the motion authorizing a construction contract with Toro Enterprises, Inc. for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project and approve a resolution of appropriation to fund the project. Doing so, however, will require the city to supplement approximately $3 million dollars in Gas Tax and Measure M funds, that could be used on other high priority capital improvement projects.
Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Daniel Hernandez, Interim Director of Public Works
Prepared by:
Armen Avazian, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer
Viktoriya Pakhanyan, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Rustom Tavitian, P.E., Civil Engineer II
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Project Location Map
436 of 606
RESOLUTION NO. __________
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REJECTING BIDS FOR SPECIFICATION NO. 3829 AND ADOPTING THE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATION FOR THE LA CRESCENTA AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 3829R, PLAN NOS. 1-3071, 3-1572, 4-649, 4-650, 18-114, 49-247, 50-638, 50-639, 50-648, 50-672, 50-673, 50-698, 50-699, AND 70-113; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
SECTION 1. That the bid(s) received in 2024 in response to La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, Specification No. 3829, are rejected, as explained in the report dated May 21, 2024, from the Public Works Department.
SECTION 2.The Plans and Specifications on file in the City Clerk’s office for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project including various documents incorporated herein, are hereby approved, adopted, designated, and shall hereafter be known as Specification No. 3829R, Plan Nos. 1-3071, 3-1572, 4-649, 4-650, 18-114, 49-247, 50-638, 50-639, 50-648, 50-672, 50-673, 50-698, 50-699, and 70-113.
SECTION 3.The City Clerk is hereby directed to advertise for bids for the work, equipment and materials described in these Plans and Specification adopted by this Resolution.
Adopted this _____ day of ____________, 2024.
____________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
437 of 606
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _________________, 2024, the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
___________________________
City Clerk
438 of 606
MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded
by Council Member , that the Council of the City of
Glendale hereby:
1. Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute a construction contract – subject to approval by the City Attorney – with Toro Enterprises, Inc., for the La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project, Specification No. 3829, for the amount of $15,433,821.
2. Authorizes a 10 percent reserve for contingency, equal to $1,543,382.
Votes as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
City Clerk
439 of 606
440 of 606
441 of 606
PARKVISTA PL
MANHATTAN AV
MANHATTAN AV
HILLWAY DR MANOR LN
PIEDMONT AV
PIEDMONT AV
PIEDMONT AV
OAK CIRCLE DR
DR
STEPHENS CIR
DEER CREEK LN
BEAUDRY SAN GABRIEL AV
SHADY GLEN
BARNES CIR
DORA VERDUGO DR
GREENMONT DR
STARVIEW DR
N. VERDUGO RD
MENLO DR
EMANUEL DR
CAMANN ST
EILINITA AV
DOLORITA AV
SHIRLYJEAN ST
MALAFIA DR
OAKMONT VIEW DR
MILDINE DR
COUNRTY CLUB DR
URQUIDEZ AV
VALVERDE CTVAL VERDE PL
ROSELAWN AV
ANGELUS AV
VERDUGO BLVD
N VERDUGO RD
HONOLULU AV
WICKHAM WY
MONTROSE LN
BROADVIEW DR
SPARR BLVD
SUNVIEW DR
CLIFFTON PL
THOMPSON CT
MARKET ST
OCEANVIEW BLVDSIERRA VISTA AVLAS PALMAS AV
ROSEMARY AV
BUENA VISTA AV
DOWNING AVEL CINO PL
ARLINGTON AV
PALOMA AV
DOWNING AV
LA CRESCENTA AV
GLENCOE WY
VICKERS DR
VICKERS DR
CASTERA AV
SPARR BLVD
MENLO DR
DEL
HONOLULU PL
AVELIBERTY PINEWOOD LN
PENNSYLVANIA AVEL LADO DR
CLOUD AV
WHITING WOODS RD
MESA LILA RDDEER PASS RD
MESA LILA RD
PICKENS STRAYMOND AVE
MONTROSE AV
GLENWOOD AV
GLENWOOD AV
RAMSDELL AV
OAKENDALE PL
GLENWOOD AV
INVALE DR
LA CRESCENTA AV
MANHATTAN AV
PIEDMONT AV
HERMOSA AV
HONOLULU AV
OAKSIDE LN
PLEASURE WY
AGNER AV
SYCAMORE AV
OAK CIRCLE DR
SUNSET AV
ORANGEDALE AV
HONOLULU AVMILLS AV
PARKVISTA DR
VERDUGO WOODS HWY EAST
WHITING
OAKMONT VIEW
VISTA
29 I-210 FREEWAY
I-210 FREEWAY
MONTROSE AV
CITY OF GLENDALE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
LA CRESCENTA AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT
EXHIBIT 1: PROJECT LOCATION MAP
29 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
& BICYCLE FACILITIES
REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT INSTALLATION
FIBER OPTIC INSTALLATION
JOHN C. FREMONT
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
FIRE STATION 29
CITY LIMITS
NOT TO SCALE
SEWER CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION/
INSTALLATION
PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON
INSTALLATION
MID-BLOCK SIGNALIZED BICYCLE
CROSSING INSTALLATION
442 of 606
8d
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Resolutions Dispensing with Competitive Bidding to Purchase a Fare Collection System and a Contactless Open Payment System for the Beeline Transit Service.
1. Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to purchase a fare collection system, including fareboxes, related equipment, software and installation, through a federalized sole source procurement with Genfare, LLC for a not to exceed amount of $1,214,073.
2. Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to purchase a contactless open payment system, including hardware, payment processing services, and data plan using the California Integrated Travel Project (Cal-ITP) Mobility Marketplace contracts with KUBA, Inc, and Enghouse Transportation, LLC for a not to exceed amount of $278,141
3. Resolution of appropriation of $278,141 in State Grant and Proposition A Local Return funds for the contactless open payment fare collection system
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Calendar
Approved for May 21, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
City of Glendale has received grant funding to purchase fare collection systems for the Beeline transit service. The new farebox system for cash collections will replace antiquated equipment while the contactless open payment system will provide added passenger convenience for credit/debit card fare collection.
The two resolutions to dispense with competitive bidding allow the city to use federal and state compliant procurements and meet granting agencies’ requirements. The fare collection system costs $1,214,073 and contactless open system costs $278,141 and both are 100 percent grant funded. A resolution of appropriation of $278,141 is needed to cover the costs of the contactless open payment fare collection system. 443 of 606
28d
5 1
7 7
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the two resolutions to dispense with competitive bidding to purchase a fare collection system and a contactless open payment system for the Beeline transit service and a resolution of appropriation for $278,141 to provide funding for the contactless open payment fare collection system.
ANALYSIS
The Beeline fixed-route bus service provides a cleaner travel option for community members to get around Glendale. The buses have equipment to collect fares from passengers. Our current fare collection system has surpassed its useful life. New fare collections systems will ensure our passengers can easily pay the fare using cash, passes, or credit/debit cards. In addition, the systems will help the Beeline gear up to offer easy fare payment options to visitors and tourists expected for the 2026 FIFA World Cup event and the 2028 Olympics.
Fare Collection System
Our current fare collection system is about 20 years old and maintaining the equipment has become problematic. In addition, at the end of 2023, its manufacturer announced end of life for our farebox model, which would make replacement parts more difficult to acquire.
City of Glendale is a subrecipient of a federal grant to replace its fare collection system.
A condition of the grant is that the fareboxes are compatible with the LA Metro’s regional Transit Access Pass (TAP) program and can integrate with the TAP system. TAP is the regional fare payment program in Los Angeles county with 27 participating transit agencies. The new fare collection system includes new bus fareboxes, additional related hardware and software, and installation. Since LA Metro administers the federal grant, its staff reviewed the solicitation to ensure it met federal grant requirements including a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal and Buy America.
Genfare, LLC will be the contract awardee for the new fare collection system. Genfare has a 40-year history of supplying American-made fareboxes to transit agencies. Its fare collection systems are widely used by over 400 transit agencies in North America.
The total cost to procure the new fare collection system is $1,214,073. The grant provides about $871,704 (71.8%) in federal funding with a required $342,369 (28.2%) local match.
Contactless Open Payment Fare Collection System
Glendale received grant funding from the state’s Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) for among other things, a contactless open payment fare collection system through the Cal-ITP Mobility Marketplace. This will allow passengers to make fare payments onboard the buses using a credit/debit card or a smart device. The open payment system will be beneficial for the expected influx of visitors first for the 2026 FIFA World Cup event and later for the 2028 Olympics. While there are plans for the regional TAP system to eventually accept credit/debit card payments, that option is currently not 444 of 606
38d
5 1
7 7
available. Transit staff sought other options through grant funding to bridge the gap and be prepared for the upcoming events in the next few years.
The state’s Mobility Marketplace has master agreements with vendors to provide goods and services at agreed upon prices from which transit agencies benefit. The master agreements also known as state purchasing schedules meet federal purchasing requirements.
The contactless open payment fare collection system has three components requiring contracts:
1. Fare Collection Software – A transit processor service that recognizes a rider category and charges the best fare for each trip considering applicable discounts.
The fare collection software will integrate with Fiserv, the City’s preferred processor.
2. Fare Validators – Payment acceptance devices equipped to read and validate a credit/debit card or smart device and bar codes, and maintenance and support.
3. Connectivity – Data plan to allow for real-time payment processing.
Proposals were received from the approved vendors for each category. With technical assistance from the Cal-ITP staff, the proposals were reviewed. Contracts will be awarded to Enghouse Transportation, LLC for the fare collection software and processing fees for three years with two one-year extensions for $43,050, and KUBA, Inc. for the purchase of fare validators and maintenance support services for three years with two one-year extensions for $194,591. The data plan is estimated at $40,500 for the five years.
The total cost to procure the contactless fare payment system is $278,141. Funding includes a TIRCP grant award of $219,250 with the city local match of $58,891.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The City of Glendale’s Beeline transit service provides residents with mobility. The new fare collection systems will provide ease and convenience for passengers. Fare payments can be made in cash or using credit/debit cards. For the new contactless open payment fare collection system, information on the new payment system will be available on the bus and on the Glendale Beeline webpage in multiple languages
FISCAL IMPACT
The Fare Collection System and a Contactless Open Payment System for the Beeline Transit Service will cost $1,492,214, a portion of which funding the Fare Collection System was approved as a part of the FY 2023-24 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $278,141 from a TIRCP Grant and Proposition A Local Return.
The appropriation request is outlined below:
445 of 606
48d
5 1
7 7
Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$871,704 GL: 51000-2160-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: G51997
Misc. Grant Fund (Federal
Grant)
$342,369 GL: 51000-2560-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: 51997
Prop A Local Return Fund
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$219,250 GL: 32610-2160-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01166AG
GL: 43110-2160-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01166AG
State Grant -
TIRCP
$58,891 GL: 24212-2560-
PWD-0000
GL: 43110-2560-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01166BN
Prop. A Local
Return Fund
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore not subject to CEQA/NEPA review.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The campaign disclosure forms are included in Exhibit A.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Daniel Hernandez, Interim Director of Public Works
Prepared by:
Martha D’Andrea, Transit Manager
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
446 of 606
1 1
1 5
1 8
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING; APPROVING CONTRACT AWARDS THROUGH THE STATE’S CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED TRAVEL PROJECT MOBILITY MARKETPLACE; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER OR A DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS WITH ENGHOUSE TRANSPORTATION LLC AND KUBA, INC. COLLECTIVELY FOR A
CONTACTLESS OPEN PAYMENT FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR THE
BEELINE TRANSIT SERVICE
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale provides the Beeline fixed-route bus service for the community and charges passenger fares; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to add a contactless open payment fare collection system for the convenience of passengers to pay fares using credit/debit cards and smart devices; and
WHEREAS, the City has state Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) grant funding and local match to procure the new contactless open payment fare collection system; and
WHEREAS, the City being a subrecipient of both federal and state grant funds, must comply with state and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) procurement and contracting requirements; and
WHEREAS, the grant stipulates purchase from the California Integrated Travel Project (Cal-ITP) Mobility Marketplace where the state has master purchasing agreements for use by transit agencies to procure a contactless open payment fare collection system; and
WHEREAS, the City released a Scope of Work to the Cal-ITP Mobility Marketplace vendors and received proposals for the three components. With Cal-ITP technical assistance, the final vendors were selected; and
WHEREAS, Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Sec. 9 provides an exemption to competitive bidding when the Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and
WHEREAS, given the need to continue providing transit services to the public, it appears that adequate justification exists, and it is in the City’s best interest― upon recommendation of the Director of Public Works― to dispense with competitive bidding and award contracts to Enghouse Transportation LLC, and KUBA, Inc. collectively for a contactless open payment fare collection system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
447 of 606
2 1
1 5
1 8
1. The foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct, and are a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding, and approving contract awards through the Cal-ITP Mobility Marketplace.
2. The Council hereby:
A. Dispenses with competitive bidding; and
B. Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute agreements— subject to approval by the City Attorney— with Enghouse Transportation LLC for a not to exceed amount of 43,050; and KUBA, Inc. for a not to exceed amount of $194,590.18; collectively for a contactless open payment fare collection system for three years with two one-year options.
Adopted this day of , 2024.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2024, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
448 of 606
3 1
1 5
1 8
City Clerk
449 of 606
1 1
1 5
1 9
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING; APPROVING A
CONTRACT AWARD AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR A DESIGNEE
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR A FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM WITH
GENFARE, LLC, FOR THE BEELINE TRANSIT SERVICE
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale provides the Beeline fixed-route bus service for the community and charges passenger fares; and
WHEREAS, the current fare collection system is past its useful life and needs replacement; and
WHEREAS, the City has federal grant funding and local match to procure the new fare collection system; and
WHEREAS, the City being a subrecipient of both federal and state grant funds, must comply with state and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) procurement and contracting requirements; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to grant funding requirements, the fare collection system must be compatible with the regional Transit Access Pass (TAP) program and be able to integrate with the TAP system; and
WHEREAS, Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Sec. 9 provides an exemption to competitive bidding when the Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to dispense with competitive bidding; and
WHEREAS, given the need to continue providing transit services to the public, it appears that adequate justification exists and it is in the City’s best interest― upon recommendation of the Director of Public Works― to dispense with competitive bidding and award a contract to Genfare, LLC for a fare collection system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
1. The foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct, and are a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding, and approving a contract award through a sole source procurement.
2. The Council hereby:
450 of 606
2 1
1 5
1 9
A. Dispenses with competitive bidding; and
B. Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute an agreement — subject to approval by the City Attorney— with Genfare, LLC, for a fare collection system in a not to exceed amount of $1,082,000.
Adopted this day of , 2024.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2024, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
City Clerk
451 of 606
452 of 606
453 of 606
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF GLENDALE
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.
The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.
Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractor(s)*: Genfare, LLC
Name
Title
Address
CityFull Name Business Address State Zip
Chairperson
800 Arthur Avenue,
800 Arthur Avenue
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
60007
60007
Eric Kaled
Mary Ann Alcon
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ name and business address. 454 of 606
DocuSign Envelope ID: 544ED2BB-A4D2-4BB2-BD54-1E7BDC1C68BB Subcontractor(s)**:
Name Address
CityFull Name Title Business Address State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Campaign Committee owned or controlled by: _______________________________________________ Title Business Address City State Zip
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named ☐ Contractor ☐ Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
.
.
.
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 2In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is ___ pages.
Executed on:
___
5 _
/
_
17 _
/
_
2 _
0 _
24 ________, at: ____________________, California.
------------ Illinois
Eric Kaled, President
________________ Print Full Name: ____________________________________________ Signature: _______________
800 Arthur Avenue, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007Address: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 847-871-1126 [email protected] Number: ____________________________________ E-mail Address: ____________________________________________ 455 of 606
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.
The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.
Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractor(s)*:
Name
Title
Address
Kuba Inc.
Full Name
Aaron Ross
Brian Frank
David Hope
Aaron Ross
Brian Frank
David Hope
4772 Lomas Santa Fe Street, Las Vegas, NV89147
Business Address City State
Surrey KT18 7EP
NV 89147
Surrey KT18 7EP
Surrey KT18 7EP
Zip
Chief Executive Officer / President Ridgecourt, The Ridge, UK General Manager
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Board of Directors
Epsom
Las Vegas
Epsom
Epsom
Las Vegas
Epsom
Epsom
4772 Lomas Santa Fe Street
Ridgecourt, The Ridge, UK
Ridgecourt, The Ridge, UK
4772 Lomas Santa Fe Street
Ridgecourt, The Ridge, UK
Ridgecourt, The Ridge, UK
NV 89147
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
Surrey KT18 7EP
Surrey KT18 7EPKuba Pay Ltd (12192667)
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Subcontractor(s)**:
456 of 606
Name Address
City
Quality Mobile Installations, LLC. 6217 Enterprise Drive, Knoxville, TN 37909 Business AddressFull Name Title State Zip
Chairperson
Meagan Sours Chief Executive Officer / President 6217 Enterprise Drive Knoxville TN 37909 Knoxville TN 37909 Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
Rusty Sours More than 10% interest owner 6217 Enterprise Drive Knoxville TN 37909 Knoxville TN 37909 ** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.
Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:
Title Business Address City State Zip
None Not applicable
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and I hereby certify that:
.
.
.
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.
In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is 2 pages.
Las VegasMay17 24Executed on:
Signature:
Address:
, 20 , at: , Nevada.
Brian FrankPrint Full Name:
4772 Lomas Santa fe Street
702-812-5230 [email protected] Number: E-mail Address:
457 of 606
458 of 606
DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE – CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Glendale Successor Agency or Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GSA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, GSA, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, GSA member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, GSA members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract affecting a contractor or subcontractor who has provided a campaign contribution.
The provisions of the Ordinance restricting Council members from voting on matters affecting campaign contributors applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, GSA’s, or HA’s approval, and specified subcontractors. A contract with the City, GSA, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
To assist members of the City Council, GSA, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and specified subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.
Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/President
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or organization ● Name of any campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:
Contractor(s)*:
Name Address
Enghouse Transportation LLC
Full Name
80 Tiverton Court, Suite 800, Markham, ON L3R 0G4
Title
Chairperson
Business Address City State
ON
Zip
L3R 0G4
L3R 0G4
Steve Sadler
Vincent Mifsud
80 Tiverton Court, Suite 800 Markham
MarkhamChief Executive Officer / President 80 Tiverton Court, Suite 800 ON Chief Operating Officer
Robert Medved Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
80 Tiverton Court, Suite 800
80 Tiverton Court, Suite 800
80 Tiverton Court, Suite 800
Markham
Markham
Markham
ON
ON
ON
L3R 0G4
L3R 0G4
L3R 0G4
See attached
Stephen Sadler & Pierre Lasonde
* “Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, GSA, or HA. In addition to the name of the person, or entity, the Contractor must also disclose the name(s) of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
459 of 606
Subcontractor(s)**:
Name Address
City
Monet +, a.s.
Full Name
Břetislav Endrys
Jan Vavrys
Za Dvorem 505, Stipa, 763 14 Zlin
Business AddressTitle State Zip
Chairperson Za Dvorem 505, Stipa, 763 14 Zlin
Chief Executive Officer / President Za Dvorem 505, Stipa, 763 14 Zlin Chief Operating Officer
Jan Horáček Za Dvorem 505, Stipa, 763 14 ZlinChief Financial Officer Board of DirectorsSee attached
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contractor. You must also disclose the names of the Subcontractor’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization.
Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.
Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:
Title Business Address City State Zip
CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
.
.
.
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form. 3In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.
Markham, ONMay 17 24Executed on: , 20 , at: , CXaXlXifoXrXnXiaX.
Anne Luu, Finance DirectorSignature: Print Full Name:
80 uite 800, Markham, ON L3R 0G4
289-800-9084
Address:
[email protected] Number: E-mail Address:
460 of 606
Enghouse Systems – Board of Directors
Stephen J. Sadler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Eric Demirian, President and Chief Executive Officer, CCFL Parklea Capital Inc.
Pierre Lassonde, Chairman, Franco-Nevada Corporation
Jane Mowat, CPA, CA, Independent Consultant
Melissa Sonberg, Professor of Practice, McGill University, Desautel Faculty of Management Paul J. Stoyan, Chairman, Gardiner Roberts LLP
Vivian Leung , General Counsel, Magnet Forensics
Monet + – Board of Directors
Ing. Bretislav Endrys
Ing. Zdenek Janda
Ing. Jan Vavrys
461 of 606
8e
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Resolution Dispensing with Competitive Bidding and Authorizing a Dark Fiber and Colocation Master Service Agreement Extension.
1. Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the existing Master Service Agreement (MSA) with Crown Castle Fiber, LLC (Contract No. C106498A) for dark fiber and colocation services and extend the term by five (5) years through June 30, 2029, not to exceed the annual budget, and authorizing one five-year renewal option.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for May 21, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Since 2017, the City has leased dark fiber and colocation services from Crown Castle Fiber, LLC at a carrier neutral facility equipped with tier 3 mechanical and electrical infrastructure. Dark fiber and colocation services allow the City to install, connect, and maintain electronics that serve as the backbone of the City’s connectivity to the internet.
This connectivity is vital to critical City operations such as Glendale Water & Power, Public Safety Dispatch, Public Works not to mention citywide services such as Microsoft Teams, Office 365, and email. The City’s current agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2024.
Given the importance of the City’s internet connectivity to core City operations, migrating to another colocation and dark fiber service provider is simply not feasible at this time due to the operational risk and cost. Establishing co-location and dark fiber services through another provider would involve a planned overlap period during which parallel services are in place and are fully functional with both the incumbent and future service vendors.
It would be extremely costly to procure additional network equipment, in addition to the professional services the City would require to establish the connectivity, not to mention the operational risk of migrating the service. Any service interruption in connectivity would adversely and significantly impact core City services.
462 of 606
28e
5 1
6 9
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve dispensing with the competitive bidding for dark fiber and colocations services, and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the existing MSA with Crown Castle extending the term through June 30, 2029, authorizing one subsequent annual five-year extension option and not to exceed the annual budget.
ANALYSIS
After solicitation of competitive pricing from three potential vendors, on May 2, 2017, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a MSA with Wilcon Operations LLC to provide dark fiber and colocation services for a five-year term and a not-to-exceed contract amount of $350,900. In September 2018, Wilcon Operations LLC completed the process of provisioning of the dark fiber circuits and services commenced.
In April 2019, establishment of colocation services within the Wilcon colocation suite located in the One Wilshire building carrier hotel began. Colocation services ordered included a half rack of equipment cabinet space, dual 120-Volt 20-Amp alternating current electrical service feeds and a multimode fiber optic cross connection to the City’s primary internet service provider, Los Nettos. This work was completed in June 2019 and in accordance with the terms of the agreement, invoicing for colocation services began. During this time, it should be noted that Amendment 1 to the Master Service Agreement was executed memorializing the merger of Wilcon Holdings, LLC with Crown Castle Fiber, LLC on December 31, 2018, and consenting to assignment of the agreement pursuant thereto.
The last phase of the project was to purchase the equipment needed to establish a three-node transport network interconnecting a pair of City data center locations and the colocation suite (Crown Castle formerly Wilcon Holdings) within the One Wilshire building. After solicitation of competitive pricing from multiple potential vendors, the City issued a contract to CCI Systems, Inc for planning, installation, configuration, testing, documentation, and remote training services of the transport network.
In May 2020, Crown Castle Fiber, LLC was contracted to perform the physical installation of the equipment within the colocation suite at the One Wilshire building necessary to establish the transport network. This action was taken to address the situation created during the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic during which domestic travel was discouraged and Executive Order M-33-20 was issued ordering all individuals living in the State of California to stay home or at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of the federal critical infrastructure sectors.
In July 2020, Crown Castle Fiber, LLC completed the process of the physical installation of the transport network equipment within the colocation suite at the One Wilshire. And lastly, in September 2020, CCI Systems, Inc completed the planning, 463 of 606
38e
5 1
6 9
installation, configuration, and testing of the three-node transport network and routing of traffic to/from the Internet over this network commenced.
The City has expended significant cost and resources in establishing internet connectivity at One Wilshire. Critical city operations such as GWP, Public Safety and Public Works rely on this connectivity as do citywide services such as Microsoft Teams, Office 365, and email.
Given the importance of the City’s internet connectivity to core City operations, migrating to another colocation and dark fiber service provider is simply not feasible at this time due to the operational risk and cost. Establishing co-location and dark fiber services at another provider would involve a planned overlap period during which parallel services are in place and are fully functional with both the incumbent and future service vendors. Failure to plan and execute a migration of services which utilizes a staggered overlapping service approach would impact City services in the form of an extended outage of services and applications which rely upon internet services. Electronic mail, web browsing, collaboration, online application, remote access, and video\teleconferencing services are examples of services that rely upon internet services.
Additionally, since a capital investment in network equipment is necessary and these devices have an associated anticipated useful life span, shifting dark fiber and colocation service vendors should be timed to coincide with the periodic asset refresh cycle of the underlying transport network equipment. If the network equipment asset refresh cycle is ignored, the City would need to acquire replacement transport network equipment “out of cycle” and, thereby, increasing the cost of migrating dark fiber and colocation services to an alternative vendor. Procured in 2019 and provisioned in 2020, the cost of the equipment, configuration and support services for the transport network was approximately $615,000; it would likely be significantly higher if purchased today given the increases in technology components over the last five years.
Lastly, Glendale’s Charter, Article VI, Section 9, allows City Council to dispense with competitive bidding where the City Council determines that dispensing with competitive bidding is in the best interests of the City. Since Crown Castle Fiber, LLC is currently the City’s provider for dark fiber and colocation services, and given the foregoing reasons stated relating to the existing equipment and facilities, as well as to ensure the continuity of service, it is respectfully requested and recommended that the City Council dispense with competitive bidding pursuant to Article VI, Section 9 of the Glendale Charter and extend the City’s existing MSA with Crown Castle Fiber, LLC.
By extending the contract with the existing incumbent vendor, it will provide the city with immediate ongoing access to the needed services, while maintaining the existing terms and conditions currently in effect.
464 of 606
48e
5 1
6 9
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Dark fiber and colocation services are essential underlying infrastructure elements which facilitate providing highly available connectivity to and routing of network traffic to and from the Internet. These services can be leveraged to provide services to the following target use cases/customers identified within the Fiber Optic Business Plan:
• Commercial Businesses
• Community Anchor Institutions, including schools and medical facilities • Utility Functions
• Municipal Government Functions
These services are actively being utilized by the City for municipal government functions and GWP for utility functions, currently. An example of the application of these services is the Wi-Fi Internet service provided to staff and the community in non- library City facilities.
No public outreach for this dark fiber and colocation services contract is expected to be needed.
FISCAL IMPACT
The dark fiber and colocation master services contract extension will cost approximately $350,000 for the initial five-year term. There is one subsequent five-year term extension option with an estimated cost of $400,000.
No new appropriation is being requested at this time. All services ordered and provided under the MSA are subject to the appropriation limits approved by Council as part of the annual budget process. For the upcoming budget year, FY 2024-25, the estimated cost of services under this agreement is $57,526.51 and is included in the proposed GWP budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and, therefore, not subject to CEQA review.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Not approve the recommendation to dispense with competitive bidding and authorize the extension of the MSA with Crown Castle Fiber, LLC, and direct staff to consider other vendors. Under this alternative, staff would need a two-year extension with Crown Castle to provide ample time to evaluate the cost, request and obtain funding, plan, and execute the dark fiber and colocation service vendor migration simultaneously with replacement of the transport network equipment. It is highly likely that after the cost evaluation is conducted, it would be excessively cost 465 of 606
58e
5 1
6 9
prohibitive to undertake an “off cycle” dark fiber and colocation service vendor migration.
Alternative 2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Mark Young, General Manager – Glendale Water and Power
Jason Bradford, Director of Finance/Information Technology Prepared by:
Varghese George, P.E., Senior Electrical Engineer/Fiber Services Manager Eric Brumm, Chief Information Technology Architect
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Finance Disclosure for Crown Castle Fiber, LLC 466 of 606
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO AMEND THE EXISTING MASTER
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CROWN CASTLE FIBER, LLC FOR DARK FIBER AND COLOCATION SERVICES EXTENDING THE TERM THROUGH JUNE 30, 2029,
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE ANNUAL GLENDALE WATER & POWER
BUDGET APPROVED BY COUNCIL FOR SAID SERVICES, AND AUTHORIZING
ONE SUBSEQUENT FIVE-YEAR RENEWAL OPTION
WHEREAS, Glendale Water and Power Department (“GWP”) and Information Technology Department (“IT”) are committed to providing reliable and trusted fiber services for business customers, anchor institutions and third-party service providers; and
WHEREAS, through a competitive procurement process in 2017, the City of Glendale (“City”) entered into a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) with Wilcon Operations LLC to provide dark fiber and colocation services for a five-year term; and WHEREAS, in 2018 Crown Castle Fiber, LLC, as a result of a merger, acquired the obligations of the MSA with the City’s consent and approval of the assignment of the MSA to Crown Castle Fiber, LLC; and
WHEREAS, since the establishment of the MSA in 2017 notable progress has been made, including the provisioning of dark fiber circuits being completed; colocation services being completed, and the interconnection of City data center locations to the One Wilshire building, as described in the Report dated May 21, 2024 by the General Manager of GWP and Director of IT; and
WHEREAS, the existing MSA with Crown Castle Fiber, LLC will expire on June 30, 2024; and
WHEREAS, City has expended significant cost and resources in establishing internet connectivity at One Wilshire and critical City operations such as GWP, Public Safety and Public Works rely on this connectivity as do citywide services such as Microsoft Teams, Office 365, and email; and
WHEREAS, given the importance of the City’s internet connectivity to core City operations, migrating to another colocation and dark fiber service provider is simply not feasible at this time due to the operational risk and cost as explained in the Report dated May 21, 2024 by the General Manager of GWP and Director of IT; and WHEREAS, the process of migrating dark fiber and colocation services to an alternative vendor must be planned in a manner ensuring continuity of services and should be times to coincide with periodic asset refresh cycle of the underlying network equipment; and
467 of 606
2 WHEREAS, Glendale’s Charter, Article VI, Section 9, allows City Council to dispense with competitive bidding where the City Council determines that dispensing with competitive bidding is in the best interests of the City; and WHEREAS, since Crown Castle Fiber, LLC is currently the City’s provider for dark fiber and colocation services, and given the foregoing reasons relating to the existing equipment and facilities, as well as to ensure the continuity of service, staff is recommending and requesting that the City Council dispense with competitive bidding and extend the existing MSA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:
1. That, the foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct and basis for Dispensing with competitive bidding pursuant to Glendale’s Charter, Article VI, Section 9, where the City Council determines that dispensing with competitive bidding is in the best interests of the City.
2. That, pursuant to Glendale’s Charter, Article VI, Section 9, the City Council hereby dispenses with competitive bidding and authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the Master Services Agreement with Crown Castle Fiber, LLC for dark fiber and colocation services extending the term through June 30, 2029, in an amount not to exceed the annual GWP budget approved by the City Council for said services and authorizing one subsequent five-year term extension option.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2024.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk
468 of 606
3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _______________ was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ______ day of ______________________, 2024, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________
City Clerk
469 of 606
470 of 606
471 of 606
472 of 606
8f
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Resolution Dispensing with Competitive Bidding and Authorizing use of CalNET Contracts
1. Resolution to dispense with competitive bidding and authorize use of CalNET Contracts.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for May 21, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Information Technology Department is responsible for overseeing the City's telecommunications services, ensuring optimal service and cost-efficiency. Since 2010, the City has leveraged the CALNET program, administered by the California Department of Technology, for competitively bid telecommunications contracts. This strategic approach eliminates minimum purchase requirements, affording the City flexibility and control over future spending. It is important to note that all future telecommunications procurements are contingent upon budget allocations and approval processes. This ensures fiscal responsibility and alignment with the City's evolving needs and priorities.
The IT Department will continue to monitor industry trends and available options to guarantee that the City's telecommunications infrastructure remains efficient, reliable, and cost-effective.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve dispensing with competitive bidding for telecommunications services contracts and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to utilize the CALNET contracts for all telecommunication services which are available. 473 of 606
28f
5 1
7 1
ANALYSIS
The Information Technology Department is responsible for oversight of agreements with providers of telecommunications services citywide. Since 2010, the City has obtained telecommunications through the CALNET program which is administered by the California Department of Technology.
The California Department of Technology (CDT), CALNET Program helps approximately 160 State and 1,800 local government agencies effectively utilize the State voice and data networks and stay connected to the best available rates, services and equipment to meet business needs. This is accomplished through competitively bid master telecommunications and consultant contracts, and proactive project management.
The Department of Technology has the lead role for telecommunications vision, strategy and policy as authorized in California Government Code (GC) Section 11541 which requires CDT to develop strategic and tactical policies and plans for business telecommunications with consideration for the systems and requirements of public agencies. Operational policies and processes are continuously updated in the State Telecommunications Management Manual (STMM).
The vision, strategy and policy for procuring and implementing telecommunications and network services on a statewide basis are through the four service grouping modules of the CALNET Master Services Agreement (MSA) originally awarded on January 30, 2007.
The CALNET MSA is easy to use by both state and local government agencies because the mandatory services were competitively bid, allowing customer agencies to avoid individual and lengthy procurement processes.
The CALNET services are comprehensive and designed to meet the majority of the State’s telecommunications service requirements. Unless an exemption is granted, as described in STMM Chapter 3-501.0, State agencies under the jurisdiction of the Executive Branch are required to obtain mandatory services from one or more of the CALNET modules.
All California government agencies are highly encouraged to utilize the CALNET MSA because they provide ease of procurement, economic benefits, interoperability and convenience of a single point of contact for provisioning and maintenance, and other benefits.
Currently there are seventeen telecommunications service categories available collectively under the CALNET program which fall into the following four major service groupings:
•FirstNet
•Legacy
•Cellular
•Data Network and Communication Services
Across the seventeen service categories, contracts have been awarded to seventeen vendors with services generally available from multiple vendors in most categories. 474 of 606
38f
5 1
7 1
Since commencing use of the CALNET program in 2010, City Council authorization to utilize the CALNET contracts has been sought on an as-needed basis. While initially requesting authorization in this manner made sense, the City now is seeking blanket approval to utilize the full range of telecommunications services available through the CALNET contracts from all vendors awarded under each telecommunications service category.
Non-State entities are required to self-certify their organization meets the CALNET eligibility criteria by completing a Non-State entity Participating Agreement (NESPA).
Non-state entities must meet at least one of the criteria below to procure services using the CALNET services contracts.
Authorized Eligibility Criteria:
•Local government entities are defined as “any city, county, city and county, district or other governmental body empowered to expend public funds for the acquisition of goods”.
•Entirely 100% tax-supported entity
•A governmental entity with a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) •Federally-recognized Indian Tribe
The City of Glendale executed a non-State entity Participating Agreement (NESPA) for the CALNET program on November 11, 2021. Once registered, non-state entities can sign up for a specific contract by completing an Authorization to Order agreement (ATO).
The City currently has executed ATOs established across fifteen categories with five vendors.
While the City of Glendale typically adheres to a competitive bidding process to ensure fair market value, there are circumstances where dispensing with the process may be justified. Specifically, City Charter Article VI § 9 Contracts requiring competitive bids delineates competitive bidding shall not be required for:
(h) Contracts with other governmental entities, or their contractors, for labor, materials, supplies or services.
In this case, staff believes that collectively the CALNET contracts meet the criteria delineated in City Charter Article VI § 9 and therefore should be categorically exempt from requiring competitive bids.
By authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to utilize fully the CALNET contracts for all telecommunication services categories and vendors which are available under the CALNET program, the City will be able to reduce the complexity, time and cost of procuring telecommunications services.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
To provide telecommunications services, it is essential for the Information Services Department to maintain available resources.
Stakeholders include:
•City Department Representatives
475 of 606
48f
5 1
7 1
•Visitors to City Facilities
No public outreach for this telecommunications services contract is expected to be needed.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with authorizing the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to utilize fully the CALNET contracts for all telecommunication services categories and vendors which are available under the CALNET program, and no new appropriation is being requested at this time. All services ordered and provided under the CALNET contracts are subject to the appropriation limits approved by Council as part of the annual budget process.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and, therefore, not subject to CEQA review.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Continue requesting City Council authority to utilize the CALNET contracts on an as needed basis. This would result in an increased cost of procuring telecommunications services, would slow the process, and delay needed services.
Alternative 2: Do not utilize the CALNET contracts and bid each telecommunications service procurement individually. This would result in a drastically increased cost of procuring telecommunications services, would significantly slow the process, delay needed services.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
Jason Bradford, Director of Finance/Information Technology Prepared by:
Jason Miller, Assistant Chief Information Officer
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
476 of 606
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\CC_05212024_Resolution_8f1.pdf1 RESOLUTION NO.______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA, DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH CALNET
WHEREAS, the Information Technology Department is responsible for overseeing the City's telecommunications services, ensuring optimal service and cost- efficiency and since 2010, the City has leveraged the CALNET program, administered by the California Department of Technology, for competitively bid telecommunications contracts;
WHEREAS, this strategic approach eliminates minimum purchase requirements, affording the City flexibility and control over future spending, which are contingent upon the City’s budget allocations and approval processes, thereby ensuring fiscal responsibility and alignment with the City's evolving needs and priorities; WHEREAS, the IT Department will continue to monitor industry trends and available options to guarantee that the City's telecommunications infrastructure remains efficient, reliable, and cost-effective;
WHEREAS, Glendale Charter Art. VI, Sec. 9 provides an exemption to competitive bidding for, among other things, contracts with other governmental entities, or their contractors, for labor, materials, supplies or services.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
1. That the foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct and a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the execution of an agreement with a single source.
2. That pursuant to Glendale Charter Art. VI, Sec. 9 provides that competitive 477 of 606
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\CC_05212024_Resolution_8f1.pdf2 bidding shall not be required for contracts with other governmental entities, or their contractors, for labor, materials, supplies or services.
3. That, the City manager is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with CALNET for the provision of all telecommunication services which are available, and an option to renew upon approval of the City Manager.
4. That no new appropriation is being requested at this time; however, all services ordered and provided under the CALNET contracts are subject to the appropriation limits approved by Council as part of the annual budget process.
Adopted this __________ day of ______________________, 2024. _________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Dr. Suzie Abajian, Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ______ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of ____________, 2024, and that same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
478 of 606
Exhibit 1 - CALNET Next Generation Service Groupings, Categories and executed Authorization to Order (ATO) Matrix Service GroupingsFirstNet Legacy Cellular Data Network and Communication Services Category # 9.1 15 16 17 18 19.1 19.2 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 Category Description
Broadband
for Public
Safety
Dedicated
Transport
Long Distance
Calling
Toll-Free
Calling Legacy
Cellular
Business
Services
CALNET First
Responders
Cellular
Services
MPLS Data
Network
Standalone
VoIP
Cloud Hosted
VoIP
Metropolitan
Area Network
Ethernet
Flat Rate
Internet
Services
Sustained
Bandwidth
Internet
Standard
Contact Center
Services
Custom
Contact Center
Services
Converged
VoIP
Broadband
with Internet
Service
Airespring
Aspen Aspen
AT&T Mobility AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T
Mobility AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T Charter Charter Charter Charter
Comcast Comcast Comcast
Crown CastleCrown CastleCrown Castle
ENA
Granite Granite Granite Granite Granite Granite
InterVision InterVision
Lumen
(CenturyLink)
Lumen
(Level3)
Lumen
(CenturyLink)Lumen (Level3) Lumen (Level3) Lumen (Level3)Lumen (CenturyLink)
Lumen
(CenturyLink)
Lumen
(CenturyLink)
NTT
NWN NWN NWN NWN NWN NWN NWN NWN
Red River
T-Mobile T-Mobile
Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon
Wireless
Verizon
Wireless Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Verizon Astound (Wave)Astound
(Wave)
Astound
(Wave)
Astound
(Wave)
Zayo Zayo Zayo Zayo
Vendor NameGreen shaded cells indicate that the City of Glendale has executed an Authorization to Order (ATO) V
e
n
d
o
r
s
479 of 606
8g
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: Sixth Public Hearing Regarding the Composition of Council Districts Related to the City's Proposed Transition to District-Based Councilmember Elections and Discussion of Potential Amendments to City Charter
1. Motion Identifying a Proposed District Map for Inclusion into a Proposed Ballot Measure to Transition to District-Based Councilmember Elections
2. Motion Providing Direction on a Proposed District Map
3. Motion Directing Staff Regarding Proposed Charter Amendments Pertaining to Council Districts, a Directly Elected Mayor, and Council Compensation
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for May 7, 2024 calendar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This marks the sixth public hearing concerning city council districts and associated charter amendments. Staff is seeking direction on two fronts: 1) either finalizing the selection of a map to be included in a proposed charter amendment or narrowing down the options and 2) additional direction on charter amendments related to Council governance. Specifically, staff is seeking direction on the following:
•Direction or Input on a District Map
•Dual Candidacy for Mayor and Council
•Terms and Term Limits
•Mayor and Council Salary
•Role of the Charter Review Committee re: Districting & Civil Service & Misc.
Cleanup Provisions
During the 5th public hearing on November 7, 2023, the Council identified three 'focus' maps that were discussed in stakeholder outreach meetings held between January and April 2024. National Demographics Corporation, the City’s demographer consultant, will provide a summary of the stakeholder outreach meetings and the feedback received. 480 of 606
28g
5 1
4 9
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council hold the public hearing and provide direction on districts and potential charter amendments.
ANALYSIS
On May 2, 2023, the Council adopted Resolution No. 23-55 declaring its intent to initiate the process to transition from at-large to district-based councilmember elections pursuant to Elections Code section 10010. The Council directed staff to commence the process to transition to council districts by way of amendment to the City Charter, to include a proposal to transition to six (6) council districts and a directly elected mayor who would be a voting member of the Council. Through the districting process, 42 draft maps were submitted to or prepared by the City for the Council’s consideration. The draft maps are attached as Exhibit 1 and can also be viewed using an Interactive Review Map available at https://mapglendale.org/draft-maps/.
Council Districts
At the November 7, 2023 public hearing, the Council identified 3 focus maps (Maps 106b, 125 and 126d) for the purpose of conducting additional stakeholder outreach.
Two additional maps (Maps 120b and 124) were shown based on participant requests.
Public Hearing
Pursuant to Elections Code section 10010, the Council is required to hold at least four public hearings. To date, the Council has held five public hearings: June 13, 2023, July 11, 2023, August 15, 2023, October 10, 2023 and November 7, 2023, as well as a study session on October 24, 2023.
The principal purpose of this sixth public hearing is for the City’s demographer, National Demographics Corporation (NDC), to provide an overview of the maps, the results of the direct stakeholder outreach conducted between January and April of 2024, and to seek Council feedback and input on a proposed map.
District Criteria
In accordance with Elections Code section 21601, the Council must draw districts that satisfy the following criteria:
•Council districts must be substantially equal in population based on the total population of residents of the city as determined by the most recent census with adjustments mandated by the State of California.
•Council district boundaries must comply with the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, and the federal Voting Rights Act. •The Council shall adopt district boundaries using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority:
(i) To the extent practicable, council districts shall be geographically contiguous. 481 of 606
38g
5 1
4 9
(ii) To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A “community of interest” is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. (iii) Council district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city. (iv) To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria, council districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.
•The Council must not draw district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party.
Draft District Maps
There are currently 42 draft maps that have been submitted to the City or prepared by the City’s hired demographer. The draft maps are attached as Exhibit 1 and can also be viewed using an Interactive Review Map available at https://mapglendale.org/draft-maps/.
NDC will provide a review during the public hearing.
Sequencing of Districting Elections
For reference purposes, staff provides the following information again regarding the sequencing of district elections if Council places the matter on the ballot. Elections Code § 10010 contains provisions governing the sequencing of elections in the new districts:
1) The draft districting plans made available during the second round of public hearings include a “potential” sequencing of elections for each draft plan as required by Elections Code section 10010(a)(2).
2) Elections Code section 10010(b) specifies two criteria for “consideration” in setting the sequencing. Those criteria are “consideration to the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act” and “tak[ing] into account the preferences expressed by members of the districts.” The sequencing of elections published with the draft plans, however, is only proposed sequencing. The sequencing of elections in the districts of the finally adopted new districting plan is at the discretion of the Council. In addition to the considerations required by Section 10010(b), cities commonly consider:
a. Completion of the terms of incumbents elected at-large. For example, a councilmember whose term ends in 2028 serves out the full four-year term even if that member resides in the same district as an incumbent whose term ends in 2026 and that district is placed on the 2026 ballot.
b. Scheduling elections in a particular district based on the expiration of the term of 482 of 606
48g
5 1
4 9
office of the incumbent who resides in the district. For example, a district in which an incumbent resides with a term ending in 2026 could be placed on the ballot in 2026. A district in which two incumbents reside with respective terms ending in 2026 and in 2028 could be placed on the ballot in 2026 or 2028. If in 2028, the incumbent with a term ending in 2026 would be out of office after the 2026 elections, but he or she could run again in 2028 for the district seat in which he or she resides.
c. If the district seat were placed on the ballot in 2026, an incumbent with the term ending in 2028 would serve out the full four-year at-large term to which elected, and then could seek election in 2028 for the district seat. Alternatively, that incumbent could run for the district seat in 2026 and, if elected, resign from the at-large seat on the City Council, creating a vacancy to be filled in accordance with the city’s laws. d. Scheduling elections in a district in which no current incumbent resides at the earlier election cycle consistent with maintaining the appropriate number of Council Members.
As noted previously, these iterations aside, with an expanded Council, it would appear that three district seats for four-year terms would be up for election in 2026, along with a two-year seat. In 2028, 3 four-year district seats would be up for election, and then three seats would be up for election every two years after that assuming no vacancies.
Staff seeks further direction on either selection of a map or direction for future discussion.
Council Governance Charter Amendments
At the July 11, 2023 and August 8, 2023 regular meetings, the Council reviewed and provided feedback regarding Charter amendments that would implement a by-district election system. Proposed Charter amendment language is included in Exhibit 2. Staff provides the following comments on the outstanding issues from the July/August 2023 meetings and other follow-up issues:
1. Dual Candidacy for Council and Mayor
The proposed charter language reviewed in July/August 2023 included a provision prohibiting an incumbent councilmember from being a candidate for mayor and for reelection as a councilmember at the same time. This is an accord with other city charters and state law (e.g. Election Code §10220.5) prohibiting the same individual from appearing on the same ballot more than once. This would have the effect of requiring a councilmember whose term is expiring but wishes to run for Mayor to choose to run for reelection or run for mayor, but not both. Council requested consideration for methods to address this challenge, including permitting individuals to run for both offices at the same time.
As a charter city, Glendale has plenary authority to run elections as a local affair and can have a charter provision that supersedes state election law. Thus, it would be permissible 483 of 606
58g
5 1
4 9
to draft Charter language to permit an incumbent councilmember to run for Council and Mayor at the same time. If the incumbent councilmember is elected to the mayorship and reelected to the Council, he or she would be sworn in as mayor and resign from council.
Then the council position would be filled in the manner prescribed in the charter.
Another method to address this challenge is to limit mayoral terms to two years (which would even the playing field for all, but still require incumbent councilmembers wishing to run for mayor to resign). At the August 8, 2023 meeting, however, the Council expressed opposition to 2-year terms for the mayorship. A third option is to require any incumbent councilmember (regardless of term expiration) wishing to run for Mayor to “resign to run” for Mayor. This option was not discussed. The constitutionality of such an approach is questionable, however, and would likely require additional research if Council is inclined to explore it further.
2. Terms and Term Limits
The consensus at the July/August 2023 was for four-year terms and for the Mayor to be subject to a two-term limit. Prior versions of the language did not clearly spell out that terms served as a councilmember are not included as mayor terms and vice versa. It was staff’s understanding this was the concept Council supported so the updated version clarifies the distinction. If Council feels differently, it can provide additional direction during the meeting.
3. Mayor and Council Salary
At the July/August 2023 meetings, the Council provided direction to prepare a Charter amendment that would establish the salary of the councilmembers at 80% of area median income (AMI) and the Mayor’s at 100% of AMI. The current AMI for Los Angeles County is $68,750 which would set the Mayor’s salary at $68,750 and the councilmembers’ salaries at $55,000. As discussed at the August 8, 2023 meeting, the Charter language has been revised to provide that the mayor’s and councilmembers’ salary would take effect and be implemented commencing upon the seating of the mayor and council after the June 2026 election when the mayoral and first district elections take place.
4. Amendments to Civil Service Provisions of Charter and Other Amendments This report focuses on City Council governance changes to the City Charter. Council has also directed staff to prepare amendments to the Charter pertaining to the Civil Service system. Staff is in the process of making those revisions as well as engaging in the meet- and-confer process required by state labor law. Staff anticipates bringing those items to Council at a future date.
In addition, staff presented information to Council in 2023 on miscellaneous charter amendments such as urgency ordinances, location of Council meetings, and removing obsolete references. Since then, the Council has established a Charter Review Committee and will be considering appointment of its members. In staff’s view, it makes 484 of 606
68g
5 1
4 9
sense to have the Committee review those changes along with the overall review of the Charter it will conduct as part of the Committee’s task. Council can provide alternate direction if it chooses.
Review and Input from Charter Review Committee
The Council has recently established a Charter Review Committee and is in the process of selecting its members. When established, the Council contemplated having the Committee review the proposed Council governance changes, i.e. districts, directly elected mayor and Council salaried and provide comments or recommendations, discussed in this Report. During the April 30, 2024 Council discussion of the selection of Committee members, it was suggested by a councilmember to not have the Committee provide input on these matters and focus on the broader review of the Charter, since the Council has already a significant amount of discussion on these governance changes and the deadline to place these matters on the ballot (August 9, 2024) is approaching. If Council continues to move forward with consideration of the governance changes addressed in this Report, staff seeks Council direction/confirmation whether to seek the Committee’s review and input.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Commencing in May 2023, the district outreach team undertook a comprehensive approach to engage the community, incorporating various methods such as hosting community workshops and pop-up events held in geographically spread-out locations, posting printed flyers in multiple locations, utilizing digital flyers for social media platforms, making phone calls, publishing information on the City’s website, publishing articles on City Connection to name a few.
This is the sixth public hearing on districts. In addition, the City held 14 public workshops and various pop-up events in 2023, along with an extensive digital outreach campaign.
In response to the City Council's call for direct community outreach to community-based organizations on November 7, 2023, staff extended invitations to 172 community-based organizations. The direct outreach to these organizations proved effective. The meetings provided an opportunity for in-depth discussions, questions, and feedback on draft maps and an opportunity for the groups to learn about the districting process.
From January to April 2024, a total of nine stakeholder meetings were conducted, engaging community leaders and representatives from 13 organizations.
1. January 11, 2024 – Glendale Latino Association Stakeholder Meeting
2. January 22, 2024 – Verdugo Woodlands HOA, Bridging the Borders, Glendale Teacher’s Association
3. January 25, 6:30 p.m. – Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association
4. February 5, 2024 – Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council
5. February 8, 2024 – Rossmoyne Mountain HOA
6. February 15, 2024 – Glendale Community College
485 of 606
78g
5 1
4 9
7. February 15, 2024 – Filipino-American Business Association of Glendale, Adams Hill Neighborhood Association, Armenian Bar Association
8. February 26, 2024 – Whiting Woods HOA
9. April 8, 2024 – Northwest Glendale Homeowners Association Exhibit 3 includes summaries of the discussions from these 9 stakeholder meetings.
Following the stakeholder meetings, the City hosted two additional public forums to discuss the feedback received from stakeholders and draft maps:
1. April 3, 2024 – Pacific Park
2. April 18, 2024 – Glendale Civic Auditorium
Residents were encouraged to attend these public forums to share their input and pose questions to the outreach team.
A summary of the input received at the stakeholder meetings and the public forums will be presented by the City’s Demographer, Doug Johnson of NDC.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. An expansion of the number of councilmembers and adjustments to Council compensation will have fiscal impacts that will be provided if Council provides direction to move forward with charter amendments incorporating those changes. Staff will provide the assessment of fiscal impact at a future Council discussion.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This activity involves organizational and administrative activities of the government related to election procedures and eligibility requirements, and such internal procedural and eligibility changes have no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. As such, this action is not a “project” subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 14 Cal. Code Regs § 15378.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Council can choose to provide no direction and note and file the item.
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
486 of 606
88g
5 1
4 9
Submitted by:
Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Prepared by:
Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
1. Proposed District Maps
2. Preliminary Charter amendment language
3. Summaries of Stakeholder Meetings
4. NDC Powerpoint Presentation – Stakeholder Outreach
487 of 606
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that regarding the sixth public hearing on Council districts the Council identifies Map No. _______ as the district map to be included as part of the ballot measures amending the City Charter to transition from an at-large election system to a by-district election system and to expand to six members elected by district and a directly elected mayor elected citywide.
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
488 of 606
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that regarding the Report to Council dated May 7, 2024 pertaining to Council districts, directly-elected Mayor, Council compensation and potential Charter amendments related thereto, the Council directs staff regarding potential Charter amendments as follows:
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
489 of 606
M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that regarding the sixth public hearing on Council districts the Council provides the following direction regarding the selection or narrowing of a final district map:
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
490 of 606
2 1
3 4
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, July 26, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
491 of 606
Map 102
District 1
Total Pop 33,116
Deviation from ideal 286
% Deviation 0.87%
% Hisp 22.6%
% NH White 53%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian-American 19%
Total 20,548
% Hisp 21%
% NH White 57%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 16%
Total 16,979
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 22%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black 4%
Total 11,472
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 24%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 4%
Total 6,235
% Latino est. 30%
% Spanish-Surnamed 28%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 33,952
age0-19 18%
age20-60 62%
age60plus 20%
immigrants 55%
naturalized 55%
english 27%
spanish 22%
asian-lang 11%
other lang 39%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 38%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 27%
graduatedegree 10%
Child in Household child-under18 23%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 23%
income 25-50k 16%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 7%
single family 15%
multi-family 85%
rented 87%
owned 13%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,846
16 0.05%
24%
59%
2%
14%
20,518
23%
61%
2%
13%
17,600
24%
22%
3%
4%
68%
2%
11,526
26%
24%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,589
28%
26%
4%
4%
63%
2%
33,067
19%
55%
25%
62%
62%
22%
20%
10%
48%
43%
46%
25%
12%
25%
58%
31%
20%
13%
31%
5%
19%
81%
86%
14%
3 31,914
-916
-2.79%
17%
66%
2%
13%
21,828
18%
63%
4%
13%
18,448
18%
16%
5%
2%
72%
3%
12,669
19%
18%
5%
3%
70%
3%
7,337
21%
20%
5%
3%
67%
3%
32,280
19%
57%
24%
57%
68%
27%
14%
8%
50%
38%
52%
24%
12%
24%
64%
25%
20%
14%
34%
7%
27%
73%
80%
20%
4 33,895
1,065
3.24%
17%
62%
2%
17%
21,404
15%
65%
4%
16%
19,533
19%
18%
5%
4%
71%
3%
13,624
21%
19%
5%
4%
69%
2%
8,235
21%
19%
5%
4%
68%
2%
33,409
20%
57%
24%
55%
63%
31%
10%
9%
50%
35%
47%
29%
12%
27%
64%
21%
14%
17%
40%
9%
18%
82%
76%
24%
5 33,089
259
0.79%
12%
59%
1%
26%
22,722
12%
65%
1%
20%
23,190
11%
10%
12%
2%
75%
1%
18,337
11%
10%
11%
2%
75%
1%
12,807
11%
10%
9%
2%
77%
1%
32,272
25%
50%
25%
38%
80%
48%
8%
16%
27%
18%
37%
32%
24%
36%
64%
12%
10%
10%
42%
25%
73%
27%
31%
69%
6 32,120
-710
-2.16%
10%
75%
1%
12%
22,698
11%
76%
2%
10%
22,652
9%
8%
5%
1%
83%
1%
17,572
9%
9%
5%
2%
83%
1%
11,864
10%
10%
5%
2%
82%
1%
31,532
21%
50%
30%
44%
77%
42%
6%
5%
47%
20%
43%
30%
22%
27%
61%
12%
10%
13%
38%
26%
70%
30%
32%
68%
Total
196,980
1,981
6.03%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:16 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
492 of 606
2 4 5
1 3
6 Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 6 (Brotman & Najarian) and any two of 1 (vacant), 3 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 4 (Asatryan & Devine)
2028: Districts 2 (Kassakhian), District 4 (Asatryan & Devine) and any one of 1 (vacant), 3 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
National Demographics Corporation, July 25, 2023�2021 CALIPER 493 of 606
Map 103
District 1
Total Pop 33,106
Deviation from ideal 276
% Deviation 0.84%
% Hisp 24.6%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 17%
Total 20,960
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 18,787
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 65%
% NH Black 3%
Total 12,967
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 24%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black 2%
Total 7,998
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,898
age0-19 20%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 56%
naturalized 62%
english 27%
spanish 21%
asian-lang 11%
other lang 41%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 36%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 14%
Child in Household child-under18 28%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 24%
income 25-50k 19%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 9%
single family 27%
multi-family 73%
rented 77%
owned 23%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,272
-558
-1.70%
26%
51%
3%
17%
20,828
24%
55%
5%
14%
17,909
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
4%
12,326
27%
25%
6%
5%
60%
4%
7,236
31%
29%
5%
4%
57%
3%
33,643
19%
60%
21%
53%
57%
30%
26%
11%
33%
36%
48%
27%
9%
23%
64%
24%
18%
16%
35%
7%
26%
74%
82%
18%
3 33,428
598
1.82%
10%
76%
1%
11%
23,697
11%
78%
2%
8%
20,682
10%
10%
5%
1%
83%
1%
14,722
11%
10%
5%
1%
82%
1%
8,923
12%
12%
5%
2%
80%
1%
33,883
20%
53%
27%
55%
75%
29%
8%
5%
59%
33%
48%
25%
17%
28%
61%
19%
15%
16%
35%
16%
48%
52%
57%
43%
4 33,744
914
2.78%
14%
65%
3%
16%
22,474
15%
63%
5%
17%
20,043
15%
14%
6%
3%
75%
3%
14,684
16%
15%
6%
3%
73%
3%
8,976
17%
16%
5%
3%
73%
2%
33,738
20%
57%
24%
51%
64%
38%
8%
10%
44%
30%
46%
31%
17%
26%
65%
17%
14%
15%
40%
13%
23%
77%
70%
30%
5 32,302
-528
-1.61%
15%
64%
2%
17%
19,871
14%
67%
3%
15%
18,691
16%
15%
7%
3%
72%
3%
12,906
18%
16%
7%
3%
70%
2%
7,697
18%
17%
7%
3%
70%
2%
31,365
18%
56%
27%
60%
62%
26%
10%
9%
55%
41%
44%
29%
13%
22%
58%
29%
15%
15%
32%
10%
25%
75%
74%
26%
6 32,128
-702
-2.14%
13%
61%
1%
23%
21,888
14%
66%
1%
19%
22,290
10%
9%
10%
2%
77%
1%
17,595
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
12,237
10%
10%
8%
2%
80%
1%
30,985
25%
50%
25%
38%
82%
48%
8%
15%
28%
17%
40%
31%
24%
36%
65%
14%
9%
11%
43%
24%
71%
29%
33%
67%
Total
196,980
1,616
4.92%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:16 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
494 of 606
1 4
2 3
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, July 27, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
495 of 606
Map 105
District 1
Total Pop 33,156
Deviation from ideal 326
% Deviation 0.99%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,418
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 17,783
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 2%
Total 11,704
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 2%
Total 6,752
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,969
age0-19 20%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 61%
naturalized 61%
english 22%
spanish 20%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 48%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 42%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 20%
multi-family 80%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,767
937
2.85%
23%
53%
3%
18%
21,445
22%
58%
5%
15%
17,806
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
4%
12,004
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
4%
6,627
29%
27%
5%
4%
58%
3%
35,260
17%
61%
22%
57%
55%
27%
22%
11%
40%
41%
46%
27%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
17%
33%
6%
12%
88%
88%
12%
3 32,172
-658
-2.00%
15%
71%
2%
11%
22,048
16%
73%
2%
7%
20,146
14%
13%
4%
2%
79%
1%
14,551
14%
13%
5%
2%
78%
1%
9,118
16%
15%
5%
2%
76%
1%
32,111
21%
53%
26%
53%
72%
31%
13%
5%
51%
31%
49%
24%
15%
27%
62%
21%
17%
14%
34%
15%
56%
44%
57%
43%
4 33,795
965
2.94%
13%
66%
3%
16%
22,956
13%
67%
4%
16%
19,636
15%
14%
6%
3%
73%
4%
13,754
17%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
8,089
18%
17%
5%
3%
70%
3%
34,247
17%
59%
24%
54%
67%
30%
8%
11%
51%
34%
48%
29%
15%
24%
64%
20%
14%
16%
39%
11%
17%
83%
74%
26%
5 32,588
-242
-0.74%
14%
64%
2%
19%
21,428
13%
65%
4%
17%
21,196
15%
13%
8%
3%
73%
2%
15,930
15%
14%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,466
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
1%
31,506
21%
52%
27%
48%
67%
40%
9%
9%
42%
27%
42%
31%
17%
29%
61%
17%
12%
13%
40%
18%
49%
51%
52%
48%
6 31,502
-1,328
-4.05%
13%
61%
1%
23%
21,423
14%
66%
1%
18%
21,835
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
17,257
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,015
10%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
30,419
25%
50%
24%
38%
82%
49%
9%
15%
28%
17%
40%
31%
24%
37%
65%
13%
9%
11%
43%
24%
71%
29%
33%
67%
Total
196,980
2,293
6.98%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:17 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
496 of 606
6 4
5 1
3 2
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
497 of 606
Map 106
District 1
Total Pop 33,642
Deviation from ideal 812
% Deviation 2.47%
% Hisp 10.4%
% NH White 74%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 23,822
% Hisp 12%
% NH White 73%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 11%
Total 20,712
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black 3%
Total 14,877
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black 3%
Total 9,015
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 34,665
age0-19 19%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 54%
naturalized 72%
english 32%
spanish 6%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 54%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 33%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 29%
graduatedegree 16%
Child in Household child-under18 26%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 16%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 34%
income 200k-plus 16%
single family 39%
multi-family 61%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,484
-346
-1.05%
12%
62%
1%
22%
22,578
14%
68%
1%
17%
22,494
10%
9%
10%
2%
78%
1%
17,690
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,241
10%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
31,846
25%
49%
26%
39%
83%
48%
9%
14%
29%
17%
40%
30%
24%
35%
63%
13%
9%
11%
46%
22%
71%
29%
33%
67%
3 33,448
618
1.88%
14%
64%
2%
18%
21,869
13%
66%
4%
16%
22,682
14%
13%
8%
3%
75%
1%
17,442
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
1%
11,655
14%
14%
7%
2%
75%
1%
32,280
22%
51%
26%
45%
67%
41%
8%
9%
42%
24%
39%
34%
21%
31%
63%
12%
11%
12%
42%
23%
56%
44%
44%
56%
4 31,907
-923
-2.81%
27%
54%
2%
16%
20,041
26%
57%
2%
14%
17,442
28%
26%
4%
4%
63%
3%
11,636
30%
27%
4%
5%
60%
3%
6,817
32%
29%
4%
5%
58%
3%
32,846
19%
58%
23%
58%
57%
24%
25%
11%
41%
41%
47%
24%
11%
26%
62%
26%
20%
12%
36%
6%
19%
81%
86%
14%
5 32,640
-190
-0.58%
21%
57%
3%
17%
21,002
20%
58%
5%
15%
17,953
22%
20%
6%
3%
66%
3%
12,411
24%
22%
6%
4%
64%
3%
7,129
26%
25%
5%
4%
61%
3%
32,189
18%
60%
22%
54%
63%
31%
20%
10%
39%
34%
51%
26%
11%
24%
66%
24%
19%
15%
34%
9%
23%
77%
80%
20%
6 32,859
29 0.09%
19%
61%
3%
16%
20,406
17%
66%
3%
14%
17,119
20%
18%
4%
4%
70%
3%
11,144
22%
20%
5%
4%
68%
2%
6,210
24%
23%
5%
4%
65%
2%
32,686
17%
57%
26%
62%
61%
22%
15%
10%
54%
44%
48%
26%
10%
21%
58%
33%
16%
17%
31%
3%
10%
90%
88%
12%
Total
196,980
1,735
5.28%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:17 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
498 of 606
4 1
2 3
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
499 of 606
Map 107
District 1
Total Pop 33,156
Deviation from ideal 326
% Deviation 0.99%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,418
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 17,783
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 2%
Total 11,704
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 2%
Total 6,752
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,969
age0-19 20%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 61%
naturalized 61%
english 22%
spanish 20%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 48%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 42%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 20%
multi-family 80%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,722
-108
-0.33%
24%
53%
4%
18%
20,585
22%
58%
5%
14%
17,246
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
4%
11,636
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
4%
6,446
29%
27%
5%
4%
58%
3%
34,181
17%
61%
22%
57%
55%
28%
23%
10%
40%
40%
46%
26%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
17%
33%
6%
12%
88%
89%
11%
3 33,001
171
0.52%
15%
71%
2%
11%
22,626
16%
73%
2%
7%
20,715
14%
13%
4%
2%
79%
1%
14,967
14%
13%
5%
2%
78%
1%
9,381
16%
15%
5%
2%
76%
1%
32,888
21%
53%
26%
53%
73%
31%
13%
5%
51%
31%
49%
24%
16%
27%
62%
20%
17%
14%
34%
15%
56%
44%
56%
44%
4 32,815
-15
-0.05%
13%
66%
3%
16%
22,138
13%
65%
4%
17%
18,864
15%
14%
6%
3%
73%
4%
13,134
17%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
7,631
18%
16%
6%
3%
70%
4%
32,814
17%
59%
24%
54%
67%
30%
9%
11%
50%
34%
48%
30%
15%
24%
64%
21%
14%
16%
39%
11%
16%
84%
75%
25%
5 32,203
-627
-1.91%
14%
63%
2%
19%
21,098
14%
64%
4%
17%
20,663
14%
13%
8%
3%
73%
2%
15,331
15%
14%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,065
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
30,950
21%
53%
26%
46%
67%
40%
9%
10%
41%
27%
44%
31%
16%
28%
62%
17%
12%
13%
42%
16%
44%
56%
57%
43%
6 33,083
253
0.77%
13%
62%
1%
22%
22,853
13%
68%
1%
18%
23,131
11%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
18,428
11%
11%
9%
2%
77%
1%
12,792
11%
11%
8%
2%
79%
1%
32,710
25%
49%
25%
41%
79%
46%
9%
14%
31%
19%
39%
31%
24%
37%
64%
12%
10%
11%
41%
26%
73%
27%
30%
70%
Total
196,980
953
2.90%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:18 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
500 of 606
1 2
3 4
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
501 of 606
Map 108
District 1
Total Pop 33,156
Deviation from ideal 326
% Deviation 0.99%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,418
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 17,783
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 2%
Total 11,704
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 2%
Total 6,752
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,969
age0-19 20%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 61%
naturalized 61%
english 22%
spanish 20%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 48%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 42%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 20%
multi-family 80%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,005
175
0.53%
23%
53%
4%
18%
21,030
21%
58%
5%
15%
17,423
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
3%
11,729
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
6,464
29%
27%
5%
4%
59%
3%
34,832
17%
61%
22%
56%
55%
27%
23%
11%
40%
41%
46%
27%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
16%
34%
7%
12%
88%
88%
12%
3 33,138
308
0.94%
15%
70%
2%
11%
22,901
15%
72%
3%
8%
20,199
15%
14%
4%
2%
77%
2%
14,315
16%
15%
5%
2%
75%
2%
8,695
18%
17%
5%
2%
73%
2%
33,401
20%
55%
25%
54%
72%
29%
13%
6%
52%
34%
51%
24%
13%
27%
64%
22%
18%
14%
33%
13%
46%
54%
66%
34%
4 32,448
-382
-1.16%
13%
67%
3%
16%
21,653
13%
68%
3%
15%
19,449
13%
12%
6%
2%
76%
3%
13,943
14%
13%
6%
3%
74%
3%
8,505
15%
14%
5%
3%
74%
3%
32,114
18%
56%
25%
53%
67%
35%
8%
9%
48%
30%
46%
30%
17%
24%
62%
19%
13%
15%
40%
13%
26%
74%
64%
36%
5 32,310
-520
-1.58%
15%
63%
2%
19%
20,687
13%
67%
3%
16%
20,810
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
15,525
16%
15%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,300
15%
15%
7%
3%
73%
2%
30,547
19%
53%
28%
48%
66%
38%
9%
10%
43%
29%
45%
28%
17%
27%
60%
18%
13%
12%
41%
16%
45%
55%
57%
43%
6 32,923
93 0.28%
13%
62%
1%
22%
23,029
15%
64%
2%
19%
22,738
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
17,984
11%
10%
9%
2%
77%
1%
12,351
11%
10%
8%
2%
79%
1%
32,649
26%
49%
24%
39%
82%
47%
9%
14%
30%
17%
38%
34%
22%
38%
67%
12%
8%
13%
42%
26%
70%
30%
33%
67%
Total
196,980
846
2.58%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:18 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
502 of 606
4 1
2 3
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
503 of 606
Map 109
District 1
Total Pop 33,156
Deviation from ideal 326
% Deviation 0.99%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,418
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 17,783
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 2%
Total 11,704
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 2%
Total 6,752
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,969
age0-19 20%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 61%
naturalized 61%
english 22%
spanish 20%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 48%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 42%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 20%
multi-family 80%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,005
175
0.53%
23%
53%
4%
18%
21,030
21%
58%
5%
15%
17,423
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
3%
11,729
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
6,464
29%
27%
5%
4%
59%
3%
34,832
17%
61%
22%
56%
55%
27%
23%
11%
40%
41%
46%
27%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
16%
34%
7%
12%
88%
88%
12%
3 32,246
-584
-1.78%
16%
69%
2%
11%
21,582
16%
71%
3%
9%
19,884
15%
14%
4%
2%
77%
1%
14,162
16%
15%
5%
2%
76%
1%
8,812
17%
17%
5%
2%
74%
1%
31,889
21%
55%
25%
54%
71%
31%
13%
6%
50%
33%
50%
25%
13%
27%
64%
22%
18%
15%
32%
14%
51%
49%
63%
37%
4 32,407
-423
-1.29%
13%
66%
3%
16%
21,937
13%
67%
4%
15%
18,782
15%
14%
6%
2%
74%
4%
13,322
16%
15%
6%
3%
72%
4%
7,878
17%
16%
5%
3%
71%
3%
32,500
18%
58%
24%
54%
67%
33%
8%
10%
50%
33%
48%
29%
15%
25%
63%
19%
15%
16%
39%
11%
17%
83%
73%
27%
5 32,882
52 0.16%
14%
64%
2%
19%
21,658
14%
65%
4%
17%
21,401
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
2%
16,074
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
10,554
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
1%
31,700
21%
52%
27%
47%
68%
38%
10%
9%
43%
27%
42%
32%
17%
29%
61%
17%
11%
13%
40%
19%
49%
51%
51%
49%
6 33,284
454
1.38%
12%
62%
1%
22%
23,093
13%
68%
1%
18%
23,129
10%
9%
10%
2%
78%
1%
18,209
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,607
10%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
32,622
25%
49%
26%
39%
83%
47%
9%
14%
30%
16%
40%
30%
24%
35%
64%
13%
9%
11%
45%
23%
71%
29%
32%
68%
Total
196,980
1,038
3.16%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:19 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
504 of 606
4 1
2 3
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
505 of 606
Map 110
District 1
Total Pop 33,156
Deviation from ideal 326
% Deviation 0.99%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,418
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 17,783
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 2%
Total 11,704
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 2%
Total 6,752
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,969
age0-19 20%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 61%
naturalized 61%
english 22%
spanish 20%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 48%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 42%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 20%
multi-family 80%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,005
175
0.53%
23%
53%
4%
18%
21,030
21%
58%
5%
15%
17,423
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
3%
11,729
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
6,464
29%
27%
5%
4%
59%
3%
34,832
17%
61%
22%
56%
55%
27%
23%
11%
40%
41%
46%
27%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
16%
34%
7%
12%
88%
88%
12%
3 33,444
614
1.87%
16%
69%
2%
12%
23,088
15%
71%
3%
9%
20,267
16%
15%
5%
2%
76%
2%
14,151
17%
16%
5%
2%
74%
2%
8,386
19%
18%
5%
2%
72%
2%
33,885
20%
56%
24%
55%
72%
28%
13%
6%
53%
35%
51%
24%
12%
27%
64%
22%
18%
15%
33%
11%
44%
56%
69%
31%
4 32,574
-256
-0.78%
14%
66%
3%
16%
21,286
14%
66%
3%
16%
18,697
15%
14%
5%
2%
74%
4%
13,289
16%
15%
6%
3%
72%
3%
8,049
17%
16%
5%
3%
72%
3%
32,173
18%
57%
25%
55%
64%
34%
8%
10%
49%
34%
49%
28%
15%
24%
62%
21%
15%
16%
38%
10%
17%
83%
73%
27%
5 32,326
-504
-1.54%
14%
64%
2%
18%
21,298
13%
64%
4%
18%
21,741
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
2%
16,581
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
2%
11,031
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
1%
30,788
21%
53%
26%
44%
70%
41%
9%
9%
40%
24%
41%
33%
18%
29%
64%
14%
10%
12%
41%
23%
56%
44%
46%
54%
6 32,475
-355
-1.08%
12%
62%
1%
22%
22,598
13%
69%
1%
16%
22,491
10%
9%
10%
2%
78%
1%
17,746
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,385
10%
9%
7%
2%
80%
1%
31,865
25%
48%
27%
39%
82%
46%
9%
14%
30%
17%
38%
31%
25%
35%
63%
12%
9%
11%
45%
23%
73%
27%
30%
70%
Total
196,980
1,118
3.41%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:19 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
506 of 606
4 1
2 3
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
507 of 606
Map 113
District 1
Total Pop 33,156
Deviation from ideal 326
% Deviation 0.99%
% Hisp 23.7%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,418
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 17,783
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 2%
Total 11,704
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 2%
Total 6,752
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,969
age0-19 20%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 61%
naturalized 61%
english 22%
spanish 20%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 48%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 42%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 25%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 59%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 32%
income 200k-plus 5%
single family 20%
multi-family 80%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,722
-108
-0.33%
24%
53%
4%
18%
20,585
22%
58%
5%
14%
17,246
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
4%
11,636
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
4%
6,446
29%
27%
5%
4%
58%
3%
34,181
17%
61%
22%
57%
55%
28%
23%
10%
40%
40%
46%
26%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
17%
33%
6%
12%
88%
89%
11%
3 33,001
171
0.52%
15%
71%
2%
11%
22,626
16%
73%
2%
7%
20,715
14%
13%
4%
2%
79%
1%
14,967
14%
13%
5%
2%
78%
1%
9,381
16%
15%
5%
2%
76%
1%
32,888
21%
53%
26%
53%
73%
31%
13%
5%
51%
31%
49%
24%
16%
27%
62%
20%
17%
14%
34%
15%
56%
44%
56%
44%
4 32,815
-15
-0.05%
13%
66%
3%
16%
22,138
13%
65%
4%
17%
18,864
15%
14%
6%
3%
73%
4%
13,134
17%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
7,631
18%
16%
6%
3%
70%
4%
32,814
17%
59%
24%
54%
67%
30%
9%
11%
50%
34%
48%
30%
15%
24%
64%
21%
14%
16%
39%
11%
16%
84%
75%
25%
5 32,203
-627
-1.91%
14%
63%
2%
19%
21,098
14%
64%
4%
17%
20,663
14%
13%
8%
3%
73%
2%
15,331
15%
14%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,065
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
30,950
21%
53%
26%
46%
67%
40%
9%
10%
41%
27%
44%
31%
16%
28%
62%
17%
12%
13%
42%
16%
44%
56%
57%
43%
6 33,083
253
0.77%
13%
62%
1%
22%
22,853
13%
68%
1%
18%
23,131
11%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
18,428
11%
11%
9%
2%
77%
1%
12,792
11%
11%
8%
2%
79%
1%
32,710
25%
49%
25%
41%
79%
46%
9%
14%
31%
19%
39%
31%
24%
37%
64%
12%
10%
11%
41%
26%
73%
27%
30%
70%
Total
196,980
953
2.90%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:20 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
508 of 606
2 1
4 3
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
509 of 606
Map 114
District 1
Total Pop 32,850
Deviation from ideal 20
% Deviation 0.06%
% Hisp 23.0%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian-American 19%
Total 20,193
% Hisp 22%
% NH White 57%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 16,776
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black 4%
Total 11,309
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 24%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 4%
Total 6,177
% Latino est. 30%
% Spanish-Surnamed 28%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 33,827
age0-19 18%
age20-60 62%
age60plus 19%
immigrants 55%
naturalized 55%
english 28%
spanish 23%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 39%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 39%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 26%
graduatedegree 10%
Child in Household child-under18 24%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 23%
income 25-50k 17%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 37%
income 200k-plus 7%
single family 14%
multi-family 86%
rented 88%
owned 12%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,284
454
1.38%
23%
59%
2%
15%
20,658
23%
61%
2%
13%
17,959
24%
22%
4%
4%
67%
2%
11,811
26%
24%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,743
28%
26%
4%
4%
62%
2%
33,369
19%
55%
26%
62%
61%
22%
20%
11%
47%
43%
45%
26%
12%
25%
59%
31%
20%
14%
31%
5%
19%
81%
86%
14%
3 32,583
-247
-0.75%
14%
73%
1%
11%
22,611
14%
74%
3%
9%
19,785
13%
12%
4%
2%
80%
2%
14,060
14%
13%
5%
2%
79%
2%
8,554
15%
15%
5%
2%
77%
1%
33,052
21%
55%
25%
54%
73%
30%
11%
5%
54%
33%
49%
24%
15%
28%
63%
19%
18%
16%
32%
15%
44%
56%
63%
37%
4 32,685
-145
-0.44%
18%
61%
2%
17%
20,794
15%
65%
3%
16%
18,482
20%
19%
5%
4%
68%
3%
12,643
22%
21%
5%
4%
65%
3%
7,532
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
3%
31,316
15%
58%
27%
62%
64%
26%
12%
11%
52%
40%
50%
26%
11%
22%
61%
27%
15%
15%
36%
7%
15%
85%
77%
23%
5 33,094
264
0.80%
13%
67%
2%
17%
22,884
14%
64%
5%
17%
22,906
12%
11%
8%
2%
76%
2%
17,687
13%
12%
8%
2%
76%
2%
11,820
13%
12%
8%
2%
76%
2%
33,102
22%
53%
25%
42%
68%
45%
8%
8%
39%
22%
40%
34%
21%
28%
64%
13%
12%
12%
40%
23%
56%
44%
47%
53%
6 32,484
-346
-1.05%
12%
62%
1%
22%
22,578
14%
68%
1%
17%
22,494
10%
9%
10%
2%
78%
1%
17,690
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,241
10%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
31,846
25%
49%
26%
39%
83%
48%
9%
14%
29%
17%
40%
30%
24%
35%
63%
13%
9%
11%
46%
22%
71%
29%
33%
67%
Total
196,980
800
2.44%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:21 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
510 of 606
3 2
56 1
4 Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
511 of 606
Map 115
District 1
Total Pop 32,474
Deviation from ideal -356
% Deviation -1.08%
% Hisp 17.8%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 20%
Total 20,791
% Hisp 16%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 20,905
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 68%
% NH Black 3%
Total 15,416
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 68%
% NH Black 2%
Total 10,136
% Latino est. 19%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 68%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,468
age0-19 20%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 48%
naturalized 64%
english 35%
spanish 14%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 39%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 30%
hs-grad 41%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 17%
Child in Household child-under18 28%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 19%
income 25-50k 13%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 16%
single family 44%
multi-family 56%
rented 58%
owned 42%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,116
286
0.87%
23%
53%
4%
19%
20,548
21%
57%
5%
16%
16,979
25%
22%
6%
4%
63%
4%
11,472
26%
24%
6%
4%
61%
4%
6,235
30%
28%
5%
5%
58%
3%
33,952
18%
62%
20%
55%
55%
27%
22%
11%
39%
38%
47%
27%
10%
23%
64%
23%
16%
16%
37%
7%
15%
85%
87%
13%
3 31,439
-1,391
-4.24%
22%
61%
2%
14%
18,350
22%
64%
2%
12%
15,961
23%
21%
3%
4%
69%
2%
10,128
25%
23%
4%
4%
66%
2%
5,412
28%
26%
4%
4%
63%
2%
30,247
18%
56%
26%
68%
60%
21%
17%
8%
54%
47%
50%
22%
10%
23%
57%
34%
20%
15%
28%
3%
12%
88%
91%
9%
4 34,393
1,563
4.76%
12%
63%
1%
22%
23,973
14%
68%
1%
17%
23,963
10%
9%
10%
2%
78%
1%
18,878
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
13,064
10%
9%
7%
2%
80%
1%
33,708
25%
50%
26%
38%
83%
47%
9%
14%
31%
16%
39%
31%
24%
35%
64%
13%
8%
10%
45%
24%
72%
28%
31%
69%
5 31,591
-1,239
-3.77%
13%
68%
2%
14%
22,577
13%
66%
5%
15%
19,826
13%
12%
5%
2%
77%
3%
14,575
14%
13%
6%
2%
75%
3%
9,262
15%
14%
5%
2%
75%
2%
32,959
19%
55%
26%
50%
67%
37%
7%
9%
47%
30%
44%
32%
17%
25%
63%
17%
15%
17%
37%
14%
25%
75%
64%
36%
6 33,967
1,137
3.46%
15%
70%
2%
11%
23,479
15%
72%
3%
8%
20,768
15%
14%
5%
2%
77%
2%
14,731
16%
15%
5%
2%
75%
2%
8,958
18%
17%
5%
2%
73%
2%
34,178
20%
55%
25%
54%
73%
29%
13%
6%
52%
33%
51%
24%
14%
28%
64%
21%
18%
15%
33%
13%
47%
53%
65%
35%
Total
196,980
2,954
9.00%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:21 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
512 of 606
1 Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
513 of 606
Map 116
District 1
Total Pop 33,318
Deviation from ideal 488
% Deviation 1.49%
% Hisp 12.0%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 25%
Total 22,173
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 20%
Total 23,267
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,346
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,677
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,448
age0-19 25%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 39%
naturalized 80%
english 47%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 42%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 74%
multi-family 26%
rented 30%
owned 70%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Total
33,318
488
1.49%
12%
60%
1%
25%
22,173
13%
66%
1%
20%
23,267
10%
9%
12%
2%
76%
1%
18,346
10%
10%
11%
2%
76%
1%
12,677
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
31,448
25%
49%
26%
39%
80%
47%
8%
16%
28%
19%
38%
32%
24%
35%
64%
13%
9%
11%
42%
24%
74%
26%
30%
70%
08/08/2023 13:23 Page 1 of 2
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
514 of 606
3 4
2 5
1 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
515 of 606
Map 117
District 1
Total Pop 32,769
Deviation from ideal -61
% Deviation -0.19%
% Hisp 11.5%
% NH White 71%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 14%
Total 23,985
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 70%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 21,105
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black 3%
Total 15,779
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 2%
Total 10,114
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 34,220
age0-19 20%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 48%
naturalized 72%
english 38%
spanish 7%
asian-lang 8%
other lang 47%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 26%
hs-grad 41%
bachelor 34%
graduatedegree 19%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 62%
income 0-25k 15%
income 25-50k 12%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 40%
income 200k-plus 18%
single family 40%
multi-family 60%
rented 54%
owned 46%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,759
-71
-0.22%
16%
69%
2%
12%
21,780
17%
69%
3%
10%
19,977
16%
15%
4%
2%
76%
2%
14,042
17%
16%
5%
2%
74%
2%
8,470
19%
18%
5%
2%
72%
1%
32,114
20%
55%
25%
56%
71%
30%
14%
6%
50%
34%
52%
23%
12%
26%
64%
23%
18%
16%
32%
12%
46%
54%
67%
33%
3 32,976
146
0.44%
16%
61%
3%
18%
20,250
13%
68%
4%
14%
17,503
18%
16%
5%
3%
71%
3%
11,839
20%
18%
6%
3%
68%
3%
6,598
21%
20%
6%
3%
67%
3%
31,473
16%
59%
25%
62%
62%
26%
10%
9%
54%
42%
48%
26%
14%
21%
61%
29%
14%
16%
34%
7%
7%
93%
85%
15%
4 32,649
-181
-0.55%
28%
53%
3%
15%
20,323
27%
55%
3%
14%
16,576
29%
26%
4%
4%
62%
3%
10,852
31%
28%
4%
5%
59%
3%
6,096
35%
32%
4%
4%
55%
3%
34,463
19%
59%
22%
58%
56%
24%
28%
10%
38%
42%
49%
23%
8%
25%
61%
27%
20%
14%
33%
5%
17%
83%
89%
11%
5 33,389
559
1.70%
18%
58%
2%
20%
21,572
17%
61%
3%
18%
20,733
20%
18%
7%
4%
68%
2%
14,925
21%
19%
7%
4%
67%
2%
9,421
20%
19%
7%
4%
68%
2%
33,319
20%
55%
25%
50%
62%
32%
14%
11%
42%
32%
41%
30%
16%
28%
61%
19%
16%
12%
40%
13%
39%
61%
65%
35%
6 32,438
-392
-1.19%
13%
61%
1%
23%
21,808
13%
66%
1%
19%
22,508
10%
9%
10%
2%
77%
1%
17,763
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
12,368
10%
10%
8%
2%
79%
1%
30,923
25%
50%
25%
38%
82%
49%
8%
15%
27%
17%
40%
31%
23%
36%
65%
13%
9%
11%
43%
24%
71%
29%
33%
67%
Total
196,980
951
2.90%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:23 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
516 of 606
4 5
6 3
2 1
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
517 of 606
Map 118
District 1
Total Pop 32,688
Deviation from ideal -142
% Deviation -0.43%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 23%
Total 22,713
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 18%
Total 22,380
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 17,598
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,148
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,939
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 82%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 27%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 17%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 22%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 21%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 39%
owned 61%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,475
-355
-1.08%
12%
72%
2%
13%
22,351
12%
73%
3%
11%
21,493
11%
10%
5%
2%
81%
2%
16,323
12%
11%
5%
2%
80%
2%
10,731
13%
12%
5%
2%
79%
2%
32,995
21%
52%
28%
49%
71%
39%
7%
6%
48%
26%
42%
31%
21%
28%
61%
14%
12%
13%
39%
22%
50%
50%
45%
55%
3 33,240
410
1.25%
18%
58%
2%
20%
21,172
17%
61%
3%
18%
21,079
20%
18%
7%
4%
68%
2%
15,385
20%
19%
7%
4%
67%
2%
9,958
20%
19%
7%
4%
68%
2%
31,893
19%
54%
27%
50%
64%
33%
15%
12%
40%
31%
41%
30%
17%
27%
61%
19%
14%
11%
41%
15%
43%
57%
61%
39%
4 32,505
-325
-0.99%
22%
62%
2%
13%
20,689
19%
65%
2%
13%
16,858
21%
20%
4%
3%
70%
3%
10,800
24%
22%
4%
4%
67%
2%
5,950
25%
24%
4%
4%
65%
2%
33,239
18%
58%
25%
64%
61%
21%
16%
8%
55%
44%
50%
24%
10%
23%
59%
33%
19%
15%
29%
4%
10%
90%
88%
12%
5 32,995
165
0.50%
22%
53%
4%
19%
20,233
21%
56%
5%
17%
16,966
24%
22%
6%
4%
64%
3%
11,475
26%
24%
6%
5%
61%
3%
6,289
29%
27%
5%
5%
58%
3%
33,300
18%
62%
20%
55%
55%
29%
23%
11%
37%
38%
47%
27%
10%
23%
64%
23%
16%
17%
36%
7%
15%
85%
86%
14%
6 33,077
247
0.75%
16%
68%
2%
12%
22,560
16%
68%
3%
11%
19,626
16%
15%
5%
2%
74%
3%
13,619
17%
16%
5%
2%
72%
2%
7,991
20%
19%
5%
2%
70%
2%
33,146
19%
57%
24%
57%
70%
27%
13%
8%
52%
37%
52%
24%
11%
26%
63%
24%
18%
15%
33%
9%
36%
64%
74%
26%
Total
196,980
765
2.33%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:24 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
518 of 606
1 Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
210
5 National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
519 of 606
Map 119
District 1
Total Pop 33,027
Deviation from ideal 197
% Deviation 0.60%
% Hisp 26.4%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 16%
Total 21,672
% Hisp 24%
% NH White 56%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 18,387
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 4%
Total 12,543
% Latino est. 28%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black 4%
Total 7,340
% Latino est. 31%
% Spanish-Surnamed 29%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 56%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 34,770
age0-19 19%
age20-60 60%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 54%
naturalized 57%
english 28%
spanish 25%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 36%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 37%
hs-grad 49%
bachelor 26%
graduatedegree 8%
Child in Household child-under18 24%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 24%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 7%
single family 26%
multi-family 74%
rented 83%
owned 17%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Total
33,027
197
0.60%
26%
52%
3%
16%
21,672
24%
56%
4%
14%
18,387
27%
25%
5%
4%
62%
4%
12,543
28%
26%
5%
4%
60%
4%
7,340
31%
29%
5%
4%
56%
3%
34,770
19%
60%
21%
54%
57%
28%
25%
10%
36%
37%
49%
26%
8%
24%
64%
24%
18%
15%
36%
7%
26%
74%
83%
17%
08/08/2023 13:24 Page 1 of 2
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
520 of 606
5 3
2 6
4 1
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
521 of 606
Map 120
District 1
Total Pop 33,056
Deviation from ideal 226
% Deviation 0.69%
% Hisp 12.0%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 25%
Total 22,049
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 20%
Total 23,071
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,184
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,563
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,261
age0-19 25%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 39%
naturalized 80%
english 47%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 42%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 73%
multi-family 27%
rented 30%
owned 70%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,978
1,148
3.50%
24%
56%
2%
17%
21,218
22%
59%
3%
15%
19,224
25%
23%
5%
5%
66%
2%
13,235
26%
24%
5%
5%
64%
2%
8,194
26%
24%
5%
5%
63%
2%
33,409
20%
55%
25%
56%
63%
27%
21%
12%
40%
36%
47%
25%
14%
28%
61%
24%
19%
12%
36%
8%
26%
74%
77%
23%
3 33,177
347
1.06%
26%
54%
3%
15%
21,284
25%
56%
4%
13%
18,297
27%
25%
4%
4%
62%
4%
12,385
28%
26%
5%
4%
60%
4%
7,173
31%
29%
4%
4%
57%
3%
34,858
19%
59%
22%
54%
58%
26%
27%
10%
37%
39%
50%
24%
7%
25%
64%
25%
19%
14%
35%
6%
26%
74%
85%
15%
4 33,123
293
0.89%
10%
74%
2%
12%
23,738
12%
74%
3%
11%
20,457
10%
9%
5%
2%
81%
3%
14,694
11%
10%
5%
2%
80%
3%
8,968
12%
12%
5%
2%
79%
2%
33,711
19%
55%
26%
54%
74%
31%
7%
7%
55%
32%
46%
28%
17%
26%
61%
18%
15%
16%
35%
16%
43%
57%
59%
41%
5 30,917
-1,913
-5.83%
17%
61%
3%
18%
19,014
16%
65%
4%
15%
15,955
19%
17%
5%
3%
71%
3%
10,651
20%
19%
6%
4%
68%
3%
5,712
22%
21%
6%
4%
65%
2%
30,107
16%
60%
23%
60%
61%
27%
12%
9%
52%
41%
47%
27%
13%
21%
61%
30%
16%
16%
32%
5%
9%
91%
87%
13%
6 32,729
-101
-0.31%
14%
69%
2%
14%
22,416
13%
69%
3%
14%
21,398
13%
12%
5%
2%
78%
2%
16,051
14%
13%
5%
2%
77%
2%
10,457
15%
14%
5%
2%
77%
2%
33,166
21%
54%
25%
48%
67%
39%
7%
7%
47%
25%
44%
32%
18%
29%
63%
16%
10%
15%
40%
19%
41%
59%
55%
45%
Total
196,980
3,061
9.32%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:24 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
522 of 606
5 3
4 6
2 1
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
E Chevy Chase Dr
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, August 7, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
523 of 606
Map 121
District 1
Total Pop 32,962
Deviation from ideal 132
% Deviation 0.40%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 22,764
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 18%
Total 22,788
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 17,985
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,447
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,070
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 83%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 14%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 39%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 68%
multi-family 32%
rented 36%
owned 64%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 31,896
-934
-2.84%
15%
62%
2%
19%
19,663
14%
65%
3%
17%
19,624
17%
16%
8%
3%
71%
2%
14,224
18%
17%
8%
3%
69%
2%
9,017
18%
17%
8%
3%
70%
2%
30,198
20%
54%
26%
52%
64%
34%
11%
9%
46%
34%
43%
29%
15%
27%
60%
21%
13%
13%
39%
14%
39%
61%
62%
38%
3 33,779
949
2.89%
23%
53%
4%
19%
20,931
21%
57%
5%
16%
17,237
25%
23%
5%
4%
63%
4%
11,598
26%
24%
6%
4%
61%
4%
6,315
30%
28%
5%
4%
58%
3%
34,643
18%
62%
20%
55%
55%
28%
23%
11%
39%
39%
47%
27%
10%
24%
64%
24%
16%
17%
36%
7%
15%
85%
88%
12%
4 33,141
311
0.95%
15%
70%
2%
11%
22,649
15%
72%
3%
8%
20,273
15%
14%
5%
2%
77%
2%
14,399
16%
15%
5%
2%
76%
2%
8,754
17%
16%
5%
2%
74%
2%
33,178
21%
55%
24%
54%
72%
30%
13%
5%
52%
33%
51%
24%
14%
28%
64%
21%
18%
15%
33%
13%
47%
53%
65%
35%
5 31,720
-1,110
-3.38%
24%
58%
2%
15%
19,678
23%
60%
2%
14%
17,267
24%
22%
4%
4%
67%
2%
11,408
26%
24%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,586
27%
25%
4%
5%
63%
2%
31,766
19%
56%
25%
61%
61%
22%
20%
11%
47%
42%
47%
25%
12%
25%
60%
30%
20%
13%
31%
5%
18%
82%
85%
15%
6 33,482
652
1.99%
13%
69%
2%
14%
24,034
13%
68%
3%
14%
21,213
13%
12%
5%
2%
77%
3%
15,586
14%
13%
6%
2%
76%
3%
9,948
15%
14%
5%
2%
75%
3%
34,657
18%
54%
28%
52%
68%
35%
7%
9%
49%
30%
45%
30%
18%
23%
61%
18%
13%
15%
39%
15%
32%
68%
59%
41%
Total
196,980
2,059
6.27%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/08/2023 13:25 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
524 of 606
6 4
5 1
3 2
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Ca
rlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 16, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 1 (Asatryan),
2 (Brotman & Najarian), and either 4 (vacant)
or 6 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: Either 4 (vacant) or 6 (vacan
2028: Districts 3 (Devine), 5 (Kassakhian),
and the 2026 two-year term district
©2021 CALIPER
525 of 606
Map 106b
District 1
Total Pop 33,139
Deviation from ideal 309
% Deviation 0.94%
% Hisp 10.1%
% NH White 74%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 12%
Total 23,755
% Hisp 12%
% NH White 74%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 11%
Total 20,475
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 81%
% NH Black 3%
Total 14,707
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black 3%
Total 8,981
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 33,727
age0-19 19%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 54%
naturalized 74%
english 31%
spanish 7%
asian-lang 7%
other lang 56%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 32%
hs-grad 46%
bachelor 28%
graduatedegree 17%
Child in Household child-under18 26%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 18%
income 25-50k 15%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 16%
single family 43%
multi-family 57%
rented 59%
owned 41%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 33,277
447
1.36%
13%
61%
1%
22%
23,046
14%
65%
2%
18%
22,992
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
18,149
11%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,569
10%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
32,430
26%
50%
24%
37%
83%
49%
9%
14%
28%
16%
39%
32%
23%
37%
66%
12%
9%
12%
43%
23%
68%
32%
36%
64%
3 33,158
328
1.00%
14%
65%
2%
18%
21,467
12%
68%
3%
16%
22,421
14%
13%
8%
3%
75%
1%
17,153
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
1%
11,361
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
1%
32,634
22%
52%
27%
46%
65%
41%
8%
9%
42%
25%
42%
32%
20%
29%
61%
14%
11%
12%
42%
21%
55%
45%
45%
55%
4 31,907
-923
-2.81%
27%
54%
2%
16%
20,041
26%
57%
2%
14%
17,442
28%
26%
4%
4%
63%
3%
11,636
30%
27%
4%
5%
60%
3%
6,817
32%
29%
4%
5%
58%
3%
32,846
19%
58%
23%
58%
57%
24%
25%
11%
41%
41%
47%
24%
11%
26%
62%
26%
20%
12%
36%
6%
19%
81%
86%
14%
5 32,640
-190
-0.58%
21%
57%
3%
17%
21,002
20%
58%
5%
15%
17,953
22%
20%
6%
3%
66%
3%
12,411
24%
22%
6%
4%
64%
3%
7,129
26%
25%
5%
4%
61%
3%
32,189
18%
60%
22%
54%
63%
31%
20%
10%
39%
34%
51%
26%
11%
24%
66%
24%
19%
15%
34%
9%
23%
77%
80%
20%
6 32,859
29 0.09%
19%
61%
3%
16%
20,406
17%
66%
3%
14%
17,119
20%
18%
4%
4%
70%
3%
11,144
22%
20%
5%
4%
68%
2%
6,210
24%
23%
5%
4%
65%
2%
32,686
17%
57%
26%
62%
61%
22%
15%
10%
54%
44%
48%
26%
10%
21%
58%
33%
16%
17%
31%
3%
10%
90%
88%
12%
Total
196,980
1,370
4.17%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/16/2023 8:00 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
526 of 606
5 3
2 6
4 1
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo
Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
este
rn Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 16, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 4 (Asatryan),
and two of 1 (vacant), 2 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 6 (Brotman,
Devine & Najarian)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), 6 (Brotman,
Devine & Najarian); and one of 1 (vacant),
2 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
527 of 606
Map 120b
District 1
Total Pop 33,989
Deviation from ideal 1,159
% Deviation 3.53%
% Hisp 12.0%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 25%
Total 22,767
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 20%
Total 23,811
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,799
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 13,018
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,264
age0-19 25%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 80%
english 48%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 27%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 10%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 73%
multi-family 27%
rented 31%
owned 69%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,299
-531
-1.62%
23%
56%
2%
17%
19,993
23%
59%
2%
15%
18,183
25%
23%
4%
5%
65%
2%
12,481
26%
24%
5%
5%
63%
2%
7,633
27%
25%
5%
5%
63%
2%
31,449
20%
55%
25%
57%
63%
26%
21%
12%
41%
37%
46%
26%
14%
27%
61%
25%
19%
13%
36%
8%
25%
75%
78%
22%
3 33,620
790
2.41%
27%
55%
2%
15%
21,859
25%
56%
4%
13%
18,592
27%
25%
4%
4%
63%
4%
12,501
28%
26%
5%
4%
60%
4%
7,267
31%
29%
4%
4%
57%
3%
35,791
19%
59%
22%
54%
58%
26%
26%
9%
38%
39%
51%
23%
8%
25%
64%
25%
20%
14%
35%
6%
26%
74%
85%
15%
4 33,123
293
0.89%
10%
74%
2%
12%
23,738
12%
74%
3%
11%
20,457
10%
9%
5%
2%
81%
3%
14,694
11%
10%
5%
2%
80%
3%
8,968
12%
12%
5%
2%
79%
2%
33,711
19%
55%
26%
54%
74%
31%
7%
7%
55%
32%
46%
28%
17%
26%
61%
18%
15%
16%
35%
16%
43%
57%
59%
41%
5 31,191
-1,639
-4.99%
17%
60%
3%
18%
18,929
15%
64%
4%
15%
15,932
19%
17%
5%
4%
70%
3%
10,650
21%
19%
6%
4%
68%
3%
5,711
23%
21%
6%
4%
65%
2%
30,102
17%
60%
24%
60%
61%
26%
13%
10%
51%
42%
48%
27%
12%
21%
61%
30%
16%
17%
32%
5%
9%
91%
87%
13%
6 32,758
-72
-0.22%
14%
69%
2%
14%
22,433
13%
69%
3%
14%
21,427
13%
12%
5%
2%
78%
2%
16,075
14%
13%
5%
2%
77%
2%
10,470
15%
14%
5%
2%
77%
2%
33,194
21%
54%
25%
48%
67%
39%
7%
7%
47%
25%
44%
32%
18%
29%
63%
16%
10%
15%
40%
19%
41%
59%
55%
45%
Total
196,980
2,798
8.52%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/16/2023 8:40 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
528 of 606
2 1
3 4
5 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo
Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
este
rn Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 16, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 6 (Brotman &
Najarian) and any two of 1 (vacant), 2 (vacant)
or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 4 (Asatryan & Devine)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), District 4 (Asatryan
& Devine) and any one of 1 (vacant), 2 (vacant) or
5 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
529 of 606
Map 122
District 1
Total Pop 32,340
Deviation from ideal -490
% Deviation -1.49%
% Hisp 26.6%
% NH White 54%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 15%
Total 20,426
% Hisp 25%
% NH White 58%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 17,467
% Latino est. 28%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black 3%
Total 11,608
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 3%
Total 6,784
% Latino est. 31%
% Spanish-Surnamed 29%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 33,211
age0-19 19%
age20-60 57%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 59%
naturalized 57%
english 24%
spanish 23%
asian-lang 11%
other lang 42%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 41%
hs-grad 47%
bachelor 24%
graduatedegree 11%
Child in Household child-under18 25%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 26%
income 25-50k 19%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 36%
income 200k-plus 6%
single family 19%
multi-family 81%
rented 86%
owned 14%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,807
-23
-0.07%
19%
61%
3%
16%
20,501
18%
65%
3%
13%
17,220
20%
19%
5%
3%
70%
3%
11,260
22%
21%
5%
4%
67%
2%
6,293
24%
23%
5%
4%
64%
2%
32,926
17%
58%
25%
62%
61%
22%
16%
9%
53%
43%
48%
26%
10%
22%
59%
32%
16%
17%
32%
4%
10%
90%
88%
12%
3 34,079
1,249
3.80%
20%
59%
3%
17%
21,292
19%
59%
5%
15%
18,725
22%
20%
5%
3%
67%
3%
12,935
23%
21%
6%
4%
64%
3%
7,418
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
32,926
18%
59%
23%
55%
64%
31%
18%
10%
41%
35%
51%
26%
12%
24%
65%
24%
18%
15%
35%
9%
22%
78%
79%
21%
4 34,375
1,545
4.71%
10%
75%
2%
12%
24,842
12%
74%
3%
11%
21,452
10%
9%
5%
2%
81%
2%
15,453
11%
10%
5%
2%
80%
2%
9,444
12%
11%
5%
2%
79%
2%
35,136
19%
55%
26%
54%
74%
31%
7%
7%
56%
32%
46%
28%
17%
26%
61%
18%
15%
15%
36%
16%
45%
55%
57%
43%
5 31,877
-953
-2.90%
15%
64%
2%
18%
21,234
13%
66%
4%
16%
21,703
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
2%
16,687
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
1%
11,113
15%
14%
7%
2%
74%
1%
31,894
22%
52%
26%
44%
64%
43%
10%
9%
39%
25%
41%
33%
19%
31%
63%
13%
12%
14%
40%
21%
54%
46%
48%
52%
6 31,502
-1,328
-4.05%
13%
61%
1%
23%
21,423
14%
66%
1%
18%
21,835
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
17,257
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,015
10%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
30,419
25%
50%
24%
38%
82%
49%
9%
15%
28%
17%
40%
31%
24%
37%
65%
13%
9%
11%
43%
24%
71%
29%
33%
67%
Total
196,980
2,873
8.75%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/09/2023 15:31 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
530 of 606
1 2
3 5
4 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo
Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
este
rn Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 16, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 5 (Asatryan,
Brotman & Najarian) and any two of
1 (vacant), 2 (vacant) or 4 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: the other one of 1 (vacant),
2 (vacant) or 4 (vacant)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), District 6 (Devine)
and the two-year term district
©2021 CALIPER
531 of 606
Map 123
District 1
Total Pop 31,722
Deviation from ideal -1,108
% Deviation -3.37%
% Hisp 19.8%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian-American 19%
Total 19,548
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 16%
Total 16,389
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 67%
% NH Black 3%
Total 11,053
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 21%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 65%
% NH Black 3%
Total 6,041
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black est. 2%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,603
age0-19 18%
age20-60 60%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 56%
naturalized 60%
english 26%
spanish 19%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 42%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 38%
hs-grad 46%
bachelor 29%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 23%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 16%
income 50-75k 17%
income 75-200k 31%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 12%
multi-family 88%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 31,843
-987
-3.01%
26%
57%
2%
13%
20,264
24%
60%
3%
12%
16,935
26%
24%
3%
4%
65%
3%
11,088
28%
26%
3%
4%
63%
3%
6,350
31%
29%
4%
4%
60%
3%
33,656
19%
58%
23%
60%
57%
22%
23%
9%
46%
43%
47%
24%
10%
25%
59%
28%
20%
13%
34%
5%
18%
82%
88%
12%
3 32,636
-194
-0.59%
16%
66%
2%
15%
22,389
16%
64%
4%
15%
19,063
17%
16%
5%
3%
72%
3%
13,287
19%
18%
6%
3%
69%
3%
7,948
20%
19%
6%
3%
68%
3%
32,932
17%
58%
25%
57%
67%
29%
10%
10%
51%
36%
51%
27%
13%
23%
64%
22%
16%
15%
38%
8%
19%
81%
77%
23%
4 33,379
549
1.67%
16%
60%
2%
21%
21,832
16%
62%
3%
18%
21,265
17%
15%
8%
4%
71%
2%
15,653
17%
16%
8%
4%
70%
1%
10,153
17%
16%
8%
4%
71%
1%
31,939
20%
54%
25%
46%
67%
38%
12%
11%
38%
28%
42%
31%
16%
27%
63%
17%
13%
13%
41%
15%
45%
55%
59%
41%
5 34,134
1,304
3.97%
13%
67%
1%
17%
23,113
12%
71%
2%
14%
23,081
11%
11%
7%
2%
78%
2%
17,917
12%
11%
7%
2%
78%
2%
12,128
12%
12%
6%
2%
78%
2%
32,854
23%
51%
26%
46%
75%
45%
8%
9%
38%
22%
41%
31%
21%
32%
62%
15%
11%
13%
37%
24%
58%
42%
41%
59%
6 33,266
436
1.33%
13%
68%
1%
16%
22,572
14%
72%
1%
11%
21,669
11%
11%
7%
2%
80%
1%
16,202
12%
11%
7%
2%
79%
1%
10,447
12%
12%
7%
2%
79%
1%
33,528
24%
51%
25%
48%
75%
36%
11%
9%
44%
27%
45%
25%
19%
33%
62%
17%
13%
13%
39%
18%
67%
33%
43%
57%
Total
196,980
2,412
7.35%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/16/2023 11:10 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
532 of 606
6 4
5 3
2 1
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo
Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
este
rn Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 16, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Any three of 1 (vacant),
4 (vacant), 5 (vacant) or 6 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 2 (Asatryan, Brotman,
Devine & Najarian)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), District 2 (Asatryan,
Brotman, Devine & Najarian) and any one of
1 (vacant), 4 (vacant), 5 (vacant) or 6 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
533 of 606
Map 124
District 1
Total Pop 33,107
Deviation from ideal 277
% Deviation 0.84%
% Hisp 12.3%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 26%
Total 22,517
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 20%
Total 23,239
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,407
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 75%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,841
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,888
age0-19 25%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 80%
english 48%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 27%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 37%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 10%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 74%
multi-family 26%
rented 29%
owned 71%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 31,711
-1,119
-3.41%
11%
74%
1%
12%
23,099
11%
75%
3%
10%
22,497
9%
8%
5%
1%
84%
1%
17,555
9%
9%
5%
2%
83%
1%
11,942
10%
10%
5%
2%
82%
1%
31,193
22%
50%
28%
42%
81%
45%
6%
5%
44%
17%
40%
33%
22%
31%
62%
11%
10%
13%
38%
27%
72%
28%
32%
68%
3 33,474
644
1.96%
16%
68%
2%
12%
22,567
18%
65%
4%
11%
19,369
16%
15%
5%
2%
74%
3%
13,314
18%
16%
5%
3%
72%
3%
7,664
20%
19%
5%
3%
69%
3%
34,442
19%
57%
24%
56%
67%
28%
13%
8%
52%
38%
52%
24%
12%
25%
63%
24%
20%
16%
34%
7%
27%
73%
80%
20%
4 32,409
-421
-1.28%
15%
62%
3%
18%
20,738
14%
65%
4%
17%
17,969
18%
16%
5%
3%
71%
3%
12,563
20%
18%
6%
3%
69%
3%
7,419
20%
19%
5%
3%
68%
3%
31,365
17%
60%
23%
57%
63%
32%
9%
9%
50%
35%
49%
28%
15%
23%
65%
22%
13%
16%
38%
10%
14%
86%
76%
24%
5 33,102
272
0.83%
27%
53%
3%
16%
21,672
24%
56%
4%
15%
17,430
27%
25%
4%
4%
63%
3%
11,678
29%
26%
5%
4%
61%
3%
6,784
32%
30%
4%
4%
58%
3%
35,759
19%
60%
21%
55%
56%
25%
25%
12%
37%
40%
46%
26%
9%
25%
62%
26%
17%
15%
36%
6%
21%
79%
86%
14%
6 33,177
347
1.06%
22%
58%
2%
17%
19,125
21%
62%
2%
14%
17,898
24%
22%
4%
5%
66%
3%
11,683
26%
24%
4%
5%
63%
3%
6,417
28%
26%
5%
5%
60%
3%
31,865
19%
55%
26%
64%
60%
20%
19%
10%
50%
44%
47%
25%
11%
25%
58%
30%
20%
14%
32%
4%
14%
86%
89%
11%
Total
196,980
1,763
5.37%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/16/2023 13:35 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
534 of 606
3 5
6 4
2 1
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo
Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
este
rn Ave
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
D
unsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, August 26, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 1 (Brotman &
Najarian) and any two of 2 (vacant), 3 (vacant)
or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 4 (Asatryan &
Devine)
2028: Districts 6 (Kassakhian), District 4
(Asatryan & Devine) and any one of 2 (vacant),
3 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
535 of 606
Map 125
District 1
Total Pop 33,008
Deviation from ideal 178
% Deviation 0.54%
% Hisp 12.7%
% NH White 62%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 22,444
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 23,032
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,233
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,669
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,825
age0-19 25%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 83%
english 49%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 17%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 72%
multi-family 28%
rented 32%
owned 68%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,042
-788
-2.40%
14%
63%
2%
19%
20,952
13%
65%
4%
17%
20,649
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
15,492
16%
15%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,154
16%
15%
8%
3%
73%
2%
31,129
21%
52%
27%
48%
65%
39%
9%
9%
42%
28%
43%
31%
16%
29%
61%
18%
12%
13%
40%
17%
47%
53%
54%
46%
3 32,368
-462
-1.41%
15%
61%
3%
18%
21,005
15%
66%
4%
15%
17,966
17%
15%
6%
3%
72%
3%
12,501
18%
17%
6%
3%
69%
3%
7,249
19%
18%
6%
4%
68%
3%
31,782
15%
61%
24%
55%
62%
32%
9%
10%
49%
35%
47%
29%
16%
20%
64%
24%
14%
17%
37%
9%
9%
91%
79%
21%
4 31,848
-982
-2.99%
10%
75%
2%
12%
23,069
11%
76%
3%
10%
20,003
10%
9%
5%
1%
83%
2%
14,455
10%
10%
5%
2%
82%
2%
8,846
11%
11%
5%
2%
80%
2%
32,515
20%
54%
26%
54%
75%
30%
7%
6%
57%
31%
46%
28%
17%
27%
60%
17%
15%
15%
36%
17%
49%
51%
55%
45%
5 34,537
1,707
5.20%
24%
58%
2%
15%
20,963
23%
60%
2%
14%
18,455
25%
23%
3%
4%
66%
2%
12,134
27%
25%
4%
5%
64%
2%
6,976
29%
27%
4%
5%
62%
2%
34,403
20%
56%
24%
62%
61%
22%
21%
11%
47%
43%
47%
25%
12%
27%
59%
29%
21%
14%
31%
5%
20%
80%
85%
15%
6 33,177
347
1.06%
26%
54%
3%
15%
21,284
25%
56%
4%
13%
18,297
27%
25%
4%
4%
62%
4%
12,385
28%
26%
5%
4%
60%
4%
7,173
31%
29%
4%
4%
57%
3%
34,858
19%
59%
22%
54%
58%
26%
27%
10%
37%
39%
50%
24%
7%
25%
64%
25%
19%
14%
35%
6%
26%
74%
85%
15%
Total
196,980
2,689
8.19%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
08/26/2023 20:33 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
536 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
W
Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
A
ve
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Du
nsm
ore Ave
210
5 Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, September 11, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 6 (Brotman &
Najarian) and any two of 1 (vacant), 4 (vacant)
or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 2 (Asatryan &
Devine)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), District 2
(Asatryan & Devine) and any one of 1 (vacant),
4 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
537 of 606
Map 126
District 1
Total Pop 32,862
Deviation from ideal 32
% Deviation 0.10%
% Hisp 13.0%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 22,763
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 18%
Total 22,560
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 17,779
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,292
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,149
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 83%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 27%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 67%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 39%
owned 61%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,669
-161
-0.49%
11%
73%
2%
13%
23,807
11%
74%
3%
11%
21,135
10%
9%
5%
2%
81%
3%
15,532
11%
10%
5%
2%
80%
3%
9,812
12%
11%
5%
2%
79%
2%
33,585
19%
54%
27%
50%
74%
35%
7%
7%
51%
28%
45%
30%
18%
25%
62%
16%
14%
15%
38%
18%
47%
53%
53%
47%
3 33,147
317
0.97%
18%
64%
3%
14%
20,957
18%
64%
3%
13%
18,444
19%
18%
5%
3%
71%
2%
12,569
21%
19%
5%
3%
68%
2%
7,200
23%
22%
5%
4%
66%
2%
32,117
19%
58%
23%
58%
65%
27%
15%
9%
50%
37%
52%
23%
12%
25%
65%
25%
17%
15%
36%
8%
23%
77%
79%
21%
4 32,739
-91
-0.28%
24%
53%
4%
18%
20,675
22%
58%
5%
14%
17,220
24%
22%
5%
4%
64%
3%
11,566
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
6,406
29%
27%
5%
4%
59%
3%
34,707
17%
61%
21%
56%
55%
27%
23%
10%
41%
41%
47%
26%
10%
22%
63%
27%
18%
16%
34%
6%
12%
88%
89%
11%
5 32,377
-453
-1.38%
23%
59%
2%
15%
19,913
23%
61%
2%
14%
17,426
25%
23%
3%
4%
67%
2%
11,499
27%
25%
3%
5%
64%
2%
6,629
29%
27%
4%
4%
62%
2%
32,015
20%
56%
25%
62%
61%
23%
20%
10%
47%
42%
46%
26%
12%
26%
59%
29%
20%
14%
32%
6%
20%
80%
84%
16%
6 33,186
356
1.08%
14%
64%
2%
18%
21,603
13%
67%
3%
17%
21,617
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
16,255
16%
15%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,728
16%
15%
8%
3%
73%
2%
31,939
20%
52%
28%
50%
66%
37%
9%
9%
44%
29%
43%
30%
17%
28%
60%
18%
12%
12%
39%
20%
51%
49%
50%
50%
Total
196,980
809
2.46%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
09/11/2023 20:04 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
538 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
E Palmer Ave
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
210
5 Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 31, 2023
Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: District 2 (Asatryan) and
any two of 1 (vacant), 4 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 6 (Brotman, Devine
& Najarian)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), 6 (Brotman,
Devine & Najarian) and any one of 1 (vacant),
4 (vacant) or 5 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
539 of 606
Map 126b
District 1
Total Pop 33,989
Deviation from ideal 1,159
% Deviation 3.53%
% Hisp 12.0%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 25%
Total 22,767
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 20%
Total 23,811
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 12%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,799
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 13,018
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,264
age0-19 25%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 80%
english 48%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 27%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 19%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 35%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 10%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 73%
multi-family 27%
rented 31%
owned 69%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,543
-287
-0.87%
11%
73%
2%
13%
23,803
11%
74%
3%
11%
21,327
10%
10%
5%
1%
81%
3%
15,900
11%
10%
5%
2%
80%
2%
10,224
12%
11%
5%
2%
79%
2%
33,170
19%
54%
27%
50%
75%
37%
6%
7%
49%
26%
45%
31%
18%
26%
61%
16%
14%
14%
36%
20%
52%
48%
48%
52%
3 33,626
796
2.42%
18%
64%
2%
14%
21,388
19%
64%
3%
13%
18,811
19%
18%
5%
3%
71%
2%
12,821
21%
19%
5%
3%
69%
2%
7,371
23%
21%
5%
3%
66%
2%
32,960
20%
58%
23%
57%
64%
27%
15%
9%
49%
37%
52%
24%
12%
25%
65%
24%
18%
16%
35%
7%
22%
78%
81%
19%
4 33,416
586
1.78%
24%
52%
3%
18%
21,160
22%
58%
5%
15%
17,439
25%
23%
5%
4%
64%
3%
11,658
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
6,476
30%
27%
5%
4%
58%
3%
35,587
17%
61%
21%
56%
55%
27%
23%
10%
41%
41%
47%
26%
10%
22%
63%
27%
18%
16%
34%
6%
11%
89%
89%
11%
5 31,405
-1,425
-4.34%
23%
59%
2%
15%
19,259
23%
61%
2%
13%
17,009
25%
23%
3%
4%
67%
2%
11,261
27%
24%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,480
29%
27%
4%
5%
62%
2%
30,818
20%
56%
25%
62%
61%
22%
20%
10%
48%
42%
46%
26%
12%
26%
59%
29%
20%
14%
32%
6%
21%
79%
84%
16%
6 32,001
-829
-2.53%
15%
65%
2%
16%
21,342
15%
67%
3%
15%
20,005
16%
14%
5%
3%
74%
2%
14,761
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
9,498
17%
16%
6%
3%
73%
2%
31,712
21%
54%
26%
50%
68%
36%
10%
8%
47%
28%
45%
29%
16%
29%
63%
17%
11%
14%
42%
16%
39%
61%
61%
39%
Total
196,980
2,584
7.87%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/30/2023 15:08 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
540 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 31, 2023
Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 1 (Brotman &
Najarian), 2 (Asatryan) and either 4 (vacant)
or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: the other of 4 (vacant) or
5 (vacant)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), 6 (Devine) and the
two-year seat from 2026
©2021 CALIPER
541 of 606
Map 126c
District 1
Total Pop 33,107
Deviation from ideal 277
% Deviation 0.84%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 22,887
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 18%
Total 22,860
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,051
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,506
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,248
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 83%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 14%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 39%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 68%
multi-family 32%
rented 36%
owned 64%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,080
-750
-2.28%
11%
73%
2%
13%
23,045
13%
72%
3%
11%
20,198
10%
10%
5%
2%
80%
3%
14,652
11%
11%
5%
2%
79%
3%
9,088
12%
12%
5%
2%
78%
2%
33,033
20%
55%
26%
51%
74%
33%
7%
8%
52%
29%
45%
30%
18%
27%
63%
15%
15%
16%
37%
16%
42%
58%
57%
43%
3 32,514
-316
-0.96%
18%
63%
3%
15%
20,741
17%
65%
3%
14%
18,232
20%
18%
5%
3%
70%
2%
12,447
21%
20%
5%
4%
68%
2%
7,215
23%
22%
5%
4%
65%
2%
31,528
18%
58%
24%
57%
65%
27%
15%
9%
49%
38%
53%
23%
11%
24%
64%
25%
18%
14%
35%
8%
22%
78%
79%
21%
4 32,594
-236
-0.72%
25%
52%
4%
18%
20,721
23%
57%
5%
14%
16,964
25%
23%
5%
4%
63%
4%
11,372
27%
25%
5%
4%
61%
4%
6,346
30%
28%
5%
4%
58%
3%
34,476
17%
61%
22%
56%
55%
27%
23%
10%
40%
41%
47%
26%
10%
21%
63%
27%
17%
16%
33%
6%
11%
89%
89%
11%
5 33,880
1,050
3.20%
23%
60%
2%
15%
20,928
22%
62%
2%
13%
18,298
24%
22%
3%
4%
67%
2%
12,099
26%
24%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,928
28%
26%
4%
5%
62%
2%
33,441
19%
56%
25%
61%
61%
22%
19%
10%
48%
42%
46%
26%
12%
26%
59%
29%
19%
14%
32%
6%
20%
80%
85%
15%
6 32,805
-25
-0.08%
14%
65%
2%
18%
21,396
12%
68%
3%
17%
21,850
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
2%
16,579
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
1%
10,984
15%
14%
8%
3%
74%
1%
31,786
21%
51%
28%
48%
66%
40%
8%
9%
43%
26%
42%
31%
19%
29%
60%
16%
11%
11%
40%
21%
56%
44%
46%
54%
Total
196,980
1,800
5.48%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/30/2023 15:09 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
542 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
210
5 Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 31, 2023
Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Districts 1 (Brotman &
Najarian), 2 (Asatryan) and either 4 (vacant)
or 5 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: the other of 4 (vacant) or
5 (vacant)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian), 6 (Devine) and the
two-year seat from 2026
©2021 CALIPER
543 of 606
Map 126d
District 1
Total Pop 33,107
Deviation from ideal 277
% Deviation 0.84%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 22,887
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 18%
Total 22,860
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,051
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,506
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,248
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 83%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 14%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 39%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 68%
multi-family 32%
rented 36%
owned 64%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,080
-750
-2.28%
11%
73%
2%
13%
23,045
13%
72%
3%
11%
20,198
10%
10%
5%
2%
80%
3%
14,652
11%
11%
5%
2%
79%
3%
9,088
12%
12%
5%
2%
78%
2%
33,033
20%
55%
26%
51%
74%
33%
7%
8%
52%
29%
45%
30%
18%
27%
63%
15%
15%
16%
37%
16%
42%
58%
57%
43%
3 33,564
734
2.24%
17%
63%
3%
15%
21,598
17%
64%
3%
14%
18,687
19%
18%
5%
3%
71%
2%
12,751
21%
19%
6%
4%
68%
2%
7,357
23%
22%
5%
4%
66%
2%
32,597
18%
59%
23%
57%
65%
27%
15%
9%
49%
38%
52%
24%
12%
23%
64%
26%
18%
14%
34%
8%
21%
79%
80%
20%
4 33,341
511
1.56%
21%
57%
3%
17%
20,295
20%
61%
5%
13%
17,239
23%
21%
5%
4%
67%
3%
11,400
24%
23%
5%
4%
65%
3%
6,184
28%
26%
5%
4%
61%
2%
33,665
18%
58%
24%
60%
59%
25%
20%
9%
46%
42%
47%
26%
9%
23%
59%
31%
17%
17%
30%
4%
13%
87%
89%
11%
5 31,777
-1,053
-3.21%
27%
54%
2%
15%
19,990
26%
58%
2%
14%
17,182
28%
25%
4%
5%
63%
3%
11,438
29%
27%
4%
5%
60%
3%
6,695
31%
29%
4%
5%
58%
3%
32,761
19%
58%
23%
58%
57%
24%
24%
11%
41%
41%
47%
24%
11%
26%
62%
26%
19%
13%
36%
6%
19%
81%
86%
14%
6 33,111
281
0.86%
14%
65%
2%
18%
21,903
12%
68%
3%
16%
22,236
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
2%
16,908
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
2%
11,237
15%
14%
8%
2%
74%
1%
32,208
21%
52%
28%
49%
67%
40%
8%
9%
43%
26%
42%
31%
19%
28%
61%
15%
11%
12%
40%
21%
55%
45%
46%
54%
Total
196,980
1,787
5.44%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/30/2023 15:15 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
544 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W
Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
A
ve
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Du
nsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, September 11, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026: Districts 1 (Brotman & Najarian) and
District 2 (Asatryan & Devine)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian) and 4 (vacant)
Alternative Election Sequence:
2026: Districts 1 (Brotman & Najarian) and
4 (vacant)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian) and
District 2 (Asatryan & Devine)
©2021 CALIPER
545 of 606
Map 127
District 1
Total Pop 47,785
Deviation from ideal -1,460
% Deviation -2.96%
% Hisp 13.6%
% NH White 63%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 20%
Total 32,383
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 68%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 17%
Total 32,386
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 25,105
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 17,089
% Latino est. 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 7%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 46,491
age0-19 23%
age20-60 52%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 45%
naturalized 75%
english 44%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 36%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 22%
hs-grad 42%
bachelor 30%
graduatedegree 21%
Child in Household child-under18 32%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 15%
income 25-50k 11%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 40%
income 200k-plus 21%
single family 57%
multi-family 43%
rented 42%
owned 58%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 50,803
1,558
3.16%
13%
71%
2%
12%
34,811
15%
71%
3%
10%
30,867
13%
12%
5%
2%
78%
2%
21,997
14%
13%
5%
2%
77%
2%
13,386
15%
15%
5%
2%
75%
2%
51,658
20%
55%
26%
53%
70%
31%
10%
7%
52%
33%
48%
27%
15%
26%
62%
20%
16%
15%
36%
13%
38%
62%
65%
35%
3 50,027
782
1.59%
24%
54%
3%
17%
32,245
22%
57%
4%
16%
26,594
25%
23%
5%
4%
63%
3%
18,126
27%
24%
6%
4%
61%
3%
10,508
29%
27%
5%
4%
59%
3%
51,695
19%
60%
22%
54%
59%
28%
23%
11%
39%
38%
48%
26%
11%
25%
63%
24%
17%
15%
36%
8%
19%
81%
84%
16%
4 48,365
-880
-1.79%
18%
61%
2%
18%
30,279
17%
64%
3%
16%
28,555
19%
17%
6%
4%
70%
2%
19,972
20%
18%
7%
4%
69%
2%
12,084
20%
19%
7%
4%
68%
1%
46,668
20%
54%
26%
56%
63%
29%
14%
10%
47%
37%
43%
29%
14%
26%
60%
25%
16%
13%
36%
10%
31%
69%
72%
28%
Total
196,980
3,018
6.13%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
09/11/2023 20:06 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
546 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
S Glenoaks Blvd
S Chevy Chase D
r
W
Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Grandview
A
ve
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Du
nsm
ore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, September 11, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four-year term: Any three of 1 (vacant), 3
(vacant), 5 (vacant) or 6 (vacant)
2026: two-year term: District 2 (Asatryan, Brotman,
Devine & Najarian)
2028: Districts 4 (Kassakhian), 2 (Asatryan,
Brotman, Devine & Najarian) and any one of 1
(vacant), 3 (vacant), 5 (vacant) or 6 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
547 of 606
Map 128
District 1
Total Pop 32,688
Deviation from ideal -142
% Deviation -0.43%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 23%
Total 22,713
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 18%
Total 22,380
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 17,598
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,148
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 31,939
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 82%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 27%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 17%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 22%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 13%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 21%
single family 65%
multi-family 35%
rented 39%
owned 61%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,511
-319
-0.97%
10%
75%
1%
12%
23,602
9%
78%
2%
11%
21,664
9%
8%
5%
1%
83%
1%
16,216
10%
9%
5%
1%
82%
1%
10,408
10%
10%
6%
1%
81%
1%
32,816
19%
53%
27%
49%
79%
35%
6%
6%
53%
26%
44%
30%
19%
28%
61%
14%
12%
15%
36%
24%
60%
40%
42%
58%
3 32,674
-156
-0.48%
27%
56%
2%
14%
20,642
25%
58%
2%
14%
17,630
27%
25%
4%
4%
64%
3%
11,655
29%
26%
4%
5%
62%
3%
6,756
31%
28%
4%
4%
59%
3%
34,143
19%
58%
23%
59%
57%
24%
23%
11%
43%
41%
47%
25%
11%
25%
61%
26%
20%
14%
35%
5%
19%
81%
86%
14%
4 33,254
424
1.29%
21%
60%
3%
15%
21,459
21%
60%
4%
12%
18,271
22%
21%
5%
3%
68%
2%
12,380
24%
22%
5%
4%
66%
2%
7,107
27%
25%
5%
4%
62%
2%
34,214
20%
57%
23%
55%
63%
25%
22%
10%
43%
39%
51%
24%
9%
26%
62%
27%
19%
16%
32%
7%
27%
73%
83%
17%
5 33,297
467
1.42%
15%
62%
3%
17%
21,893
14%
63%
5%
17%
19,133
17%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
13,699
18%
17%
6%
3%
70%
4%
8,282
19%
17%
5%
3%
70%
3%
33,056
18%
59%
23%
54%
61%
35%
9%
9%
46%
32%
45%
31%
17%
23%
65%
19%
14%
15%
40%
12%
18%
82%
71%
29%
6 32,556
-274
-0.83%
17%
61%
2%
19%
19,409
16%
65%
3%
16%
19,324
18%
17%
7%
4%
70%
2%
13,652
19%
18%
7%
4%
68%
2%
8,366
20%
18%
7%
4%
68%
1%
30,344
18%
54%
28%
58%
63%
30%
13%
10%
48%
38%
45%
25%
14%
24%
59%
28%
15%
13%
34%
10%
30%
70%
72%
28%
Total
196,980
786
2.39%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
09/11/2023 20:19 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
548 of 606
2 1
3 5
4 6
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Cresce
nta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Glendale Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Blvd
Gra
ndview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta StDunsmore Ave
5 210
National Demographics Corporation, September 20, 2023
�2021 CALIPER
549 of 606
Map 129
District 1
Total Pop 33,462
Deviation from ideal 632
% Deviation 1.93%
% Hisp 24.1%
% NH White 56%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian-American 16%
Total 20,460
% Hisp 23%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 17,981
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 24%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 65%
% NH Black 3%
Total 11,989
% Latino est. 28%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 62%
% NH Black 3%
Total 7,078
% Latino est. 61%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 5%
% NH White est. 60%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 32,864
age0-19 19%
age20-60 56%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 60%
naturalized 62%
english 23%
spanish 21%
asian-lang 11%
other lang 44%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 41%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 24%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 27%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 60%
income 0-25k 28%
income 25-50k 19%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 6%
single family 18%
multi-family 82%
rented 84%
owned 16%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2017-2021 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 31,443
-1,387
-4.22%
16%
62%
3%
17%
19,735
14%
66%
4%
14%
16,473
17%
16%
5%
3%
72%
3%
10,995
19%
18%
6%
6%
69%
3%
5,982
42%
19%
6%
4%
68%
2%
30,566
16%
60%
24%
61%
61%
26%
11%
9%
53%
40%
48%
28%
13%
21%
61%
30%
16%
17%
32%
6%
8%
92%
86%
14%
3 33,177
347
1.06%
26%
54%
3%
15%
21,284
25%
56%
4%
13%
18,297
27%
25%
4%
4%
62%
4%
12,385
28%
26%
5%
5%
60%
4%
7,173
62%
29%
4%
4%
57%
3%
34,858
19%
59%
22%
54%
58%
26%
27%
10%
37%
39%
50%
24%
7%
25%
64%
25%
19%
14%
35%
6%
26%
74%
85%
15%
4 32,762
-68
-0.21%
14%
64%
2%
18%
21,524
14%
64%
4%
17%
21,599
15%
13%
8%
3%
72%
3%
16,287
15%
14%
8%
8%
72%
3%
10,652
27%
15%
7%
3%
72%
3%
32,339
20%
55%
25%
48%
63%
42%
8%
9%
41%
28%
42%
32%
19%
26%
63%
15%
13%
12%
42%
18%
44%
56%
53%
47%
5 32,165
-665
-2.03%
9%
76%
1%
11%
23,072
10%
78%
2%
10%
20,658
9%
8%
5%
1%
84%
1%
15,096
10%
9%
5%
5%
83%
1%
9,433
18%
10%
6%
2%
82%
1%
32,650
20%
53%
27%
53%
77%
30%
6%
6%
57%
31%
46%
28%
18%
28%
60%
16%
14%
16%
34%
19%
56%
44%
49%
51%
6 33,971
1,141
3.48%
13%
62%
1%
22%
23,643
14%
65%
2%
18%
23,394
10%
10%
10%
2%
77%
1%
18,448
11%
10%
9%
9%
78%
1%
12,749
17%
10%
7%
2%
80%
1%
33,235
26%
50%
24%
37%
83%
49%
9%
14%
28%
16%
39%
32%
23%
37%
67%
12%
9%
13%
44%
23%
66%
34%
37%
63%
Total
196,980
2,528
7.70%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
6%
72%
2%
53,067
34%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
09/20/2023 13:32 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
550 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026: Districts 1
(Brotman & Najarian) and 2 (Asatrian,
Devine & Kassakhian)
2028: Districts 3 (vacant) and 4 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
551 of 606
Map 130
District 1
Total Pop 49,173
Deviation from ideal -72
% Deviation -0.15%
% Hisp 12.7%
% NH White 62%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 33,846
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 65%
% NH Black 2%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 34,583
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 27,201
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 18,790
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 11%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 47,645
age0-19 25%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 37%
naturalized 79%
english 48%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 13%
other lang 31%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 18%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 33%
graduatedegree 23%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 25%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 34%
owned 66%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 49,277
32 0.06%
14%
70%
2%
12%
34,437
14%
72%
3%
10%
30,524
14%
13%
5%
2%
78%
2%
21,810
15%
14%
5%
2%
76%
2%
13,355
16%
15%
5%
2%
75%
2%
50,005
20%
54%
26%
54%
73%
30%
12%
7%
51%
32%
48%
26%
14%
27%
62%
20%
16%
15%
35%
14%
47%
53%
61%
39%
3 50,839
1,594
3.24%
25%
55%
2%
16%
31,770
24%
58%
3%
14%
26,870
26%
24%
4%
4%
64%
3%
17,738
28%
26%
4%
5%
62%
3%
10,107
31%
28%
4%
5%
59%
3%
52,450
19%
58%
23%
59%
58%
23%
23%
11%
43%
42%
46%
25%
10%
25%
60%
29%
18%
14%
34%
5%
17%
83%
88%
12%
4 47,691
-1,554
-3.16%
16%
62%
3%
17%
29,665
15%
64%
4%
16%
26,425
18%
16%
5%
3%
71%
4%
18,451
20%
18%
5%
3%
69%
3%
10,815
21%
19%
5%
3%
68%
3%
46,412
17%
59%
24%
58%
60%
31%
10%
10%
49%
36%
50%
27%
14%
23%
62%
24%
15%
16%
36%
9%
13%
87%
79%
21%
Total
196,980
3,148
6.39%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 17:08 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
552 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026: Districts 2 (Asatrian, Devine) and 3
(Brotman & Najarian)
2028: Districts 1 (Kassakhian) and 4 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
553 of 606
Map 131
District 1
Total Pop 50,199
Deviation from ideal 954
% Deviation 1.94%
% Hisp 23.9%
% NH White 54%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 17%
Total 31,596
% Hisp 22%
% NH White 57%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 26,693
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 64%
% NH Black 3%
Total 18,118
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 24%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 3%
Total 10,329
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 51,173
age0-19 19%
age20-60 60%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 55%
naturalized 59%
english 28%
spanish 24%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 39%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 38%
hs-grad 50%
bachelor 24%
graduatedegree 9%
Child in Household child-under18 24%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 25%
income 25-50k 18%
income 50-75k 15%
income 75-200k 35%
income 200k-plus 7%
single family 19%
multi-family 81%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 50,798
1,553
3.15%
11%
73%
2%
13%
35,173
12%
74%
3%
11%
31,817
12%
11%
5%
2%
80%
2%
23,128
13%
12%
5%
2%
79%
2%
14,321
13%
13%
5%
2%
78%
2%
51,669
20%
55%
26%
55%
70%
33%
7%
7%
54%
31%
46%
29%
17%
27%
61%
17%
14%
15%
38%
16%
40%
60%
58%
42%
3 49,173
-72
-0.15%
13%
62%
1%
22%
33,846
13%
65%
2%
19%
34,583
11%
10%
10%
2%
76%
1%
27,201
11%
11%
10%
2%
76%
1%
18,790
11%
11%
8%
2%
78%
1%
47,645
25%
50%
25%
37%
79%
48%
8%
13%
31%
18%
38%
33%
23%
34%
65%
12%
9%
11%
43%
25%
70%
30%
34%
66%
4 46,810
-2,435
-4.94%
21%
60%
2%
15%
29,103
21%
63%
3%
14%
25,309
23%
21%
4%
4%
68%
3%
16,753
25%
23%
4%
5%
65%
3%
9,627
26%
24%
4%
4%
63%
3%
46,025
18%
56%
26%
62%
61%
23%
16%
10%
51%
42%
47%
26%
12%
23%
58%
31%
18%
15%
32%
5%
15%
85%
85%
15%
Total
196,980
3,988
8.10%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 17:13 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
554 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026: Districts 1 (Najarian), 2 (Asatryan & Devine)
and 5 (Brotman)
2028: Districts 3 (Kassakhian) and 4 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
555 of 606
Map 132
District 1
Total Pop 39,262
Deviation from ideal -134
% Deviation -0.34%
% Hisp 12.0%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 24%
Total 26,587
% Hisp 13%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 27,878
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 22,083
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 15,421
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 37,315
age0-19 24%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 26%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 81%
english 48%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 29%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 18%
hs-grad 38%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 34%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 64%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 9%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 26%
single family 76%
multi-family 24%
rented 29%
owned 71%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 39,789
393
1.00%
10%
74%
2%
12%
28,380
12%
74%
3%
11%
24,902
10%
9%
5%
2%
81%
2%
18,034
11%
10%
5%
2%
80%
2%
11,103
12%
11%
5%
2%
79%
2%
41,221
19%
55%
26%
52%
73%
33%
7%
7%
54%
31%
46%
29%
17%
26%
61%
17%
14%
16%
36%
16%
43%
57%
58%
42%
3 38,217
-1,179
-2.99%
26%
56%
2%
14%
25,430
24%
57%
4%
13%
21,485
26%
24%
4%
3%
64%
4%
14,667
27%
25%
5%
4%
62%
3%
8,789
30%
28%
4%
3%
60%
3%
40,697
19%
58%
23%
54%
59%
28%
25%
10%
38%
38%
49%
24%
9%
25%
63%
26%
19%
13%
35%
7%
27%
73%
82%
18%
4 40,415
1,019
2.59%
20%
58%
3%
17%
24,519
19%
63%
4%
15%
20,943
21%
19%
5%
4%
69%
2%
13,987
23%
21%
6%
4%
66%
2%
7,780
25%
23%
5%
4%
64%
2%
38,584
17%
59%
24%
61%
61%
25%
17%
10%
48%
40%
48%
27%
13%
22%
62%
28%
16%
16%
33%
7%
8%
92%
84%
16%
5 39,297
-99
-0.25%
18%
62%
2%
17%
24,801
16%
65%
4%
15%
23,194
19%
18%
5%
4%
71%
3%
16,429
20%
19%
5%
4%
69%
2%
9,974
21%
19%
5%
4%
69%
2%
38,695
21%
54%
25%
55%
62%
31%
12%
9%
47%
35%
46%
29%
13%
29%
61%
22%
15%
15%
38%
10%
29%
71%
73%
27%
Total
196,980
2,198
5.58%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 17:21 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
556 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026: Districts 2 (Asatryan & Kassakhian),
4 (Najarian), and 5 (Brotman)
2028: Districts 3 (Devine) and 1 (vacant)
©2021 CALIPER
557 of 606
Map 133
District 1
Total Pop 38,617
Deviation from ideal -779
% Deviation -1.98%
% Hisp 26.8%
% NH White 54%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 14%
Total 25,141
% Hisp 25%
% NH White 55%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 14%
Total 21,143
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 63%
% NH Black 4%
Total 14,337
% Latino est. 28%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 4%
Total 8,497
% Latino est. 31%
% Spanish-Surnamed 29%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 58%
% NH Black est. 3%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 41,037
age0-19 19%
age20-60 58%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 54%
naturalized 58%
english 27%
spanish 26%
asian-lang 11%
other lang 36%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 38%
hs-grad 48%
bachelor 24%
graduatedegree 9%
Child in Household child-under18 25%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 63%
income 0-25k 26%
income 25-50k 19%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 34%
income 200k-plus 7%
single family 25%
multi-family 75%
rented 85%
owned 15%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 40,429
1,033
2.62%
12%
70%
2%
14%
27,822
13%
71%
3%
12%
24,102
12%
11%
5%
2%
78%
3%
17,199
13%
12%
6%
2%
77%
3%
10,375
14%
14%
5%
2%
76%
2%
39,701
19%
56%
25%
55%
72%
31%
8%
8%
53%
33%
48%
28%
15%
25%
63%
19%
17%
16%
35%
14%
36%
64%
64%
36%
3 39,379
-17
-0.04%
14%
66%
3%
16%
25,893
12%
71%
4%
13%
23,587
15%
13%
5%
2%
76%
2%
16,904
16%
15%
6%
3%
74%
2%
10,272
17%
16%
6%
3%
73%
2%
39,199
17%
56%
27%
57%
64%
32%
7%
8%
52%
34%
47%
28%
16%
23%
60%
24%
12%
15%
37%
12%
24%
76%
69%
31%
4 38,153
-1,243
-3.16%
12%
61%
1%
24%
25,823
13%
66%
1%
19%
27,025
10%
10%
11%
2%
76%
1%
21,388
11%
10%
10%
2%
76%
1%
14,940
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
36,236
24%
50%
26%
38%
81%
49%
8%
15%
28%
18%
38%
32%
25%
34%
63%
12%
9%
10%
43%
25%
75%
25%
30%
70%
5 40,402
1,006
2.55%
21%
60%
2%
16%
25,039
20%
61%
3%
15%
22,545
22%
20%
4%
4%
69%
2%
15,372
23%
21%
4%
5%
67%
2%
8,983
24%
22%
5%
4%
66%
2%
40,339
21%
56%
22%
55%
61%
26%
18%
9%
47%
38%
45%
28%
12%
29%
63%
23%
18%
15%
35%
9%
25%
75%
79%
21%
Total
196,980
2,276
5.78%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 18:20 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
558 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Los Feliz Rd
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four year terms: Districts 1 (Najarian &
Brotman), 3 (Asatryan) and either 2 (vacant)
or 4 (vacant)
2026, two year term: the other of 2 (vacant) or
4 (vacant)
2028: Districts 5 (Kassakhian), 6 (Devine) and
the 2026 two year term district
©2021 CALIPER
559 of 606
Map 134
District 1
Total Pop 32,128
Deviation from ideal -702
% Deviation -2.14%
% Hisp 12.8%
% NH White 61%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 23%
Total 21,888
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 22,290
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 9%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 17,595
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 12,237
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 80%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 30,985
age0-19 25%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 82%
english 48%
spanish 8%
asian-lang 15%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 17%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 36%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 14%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 43%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 71%
multi-family 29%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,025
-805
-2.45%
15%
63%
2%
19%
20,867
14%
64%
4%
17%
20,633
16%
14%
8%
3%
72%
2%
15,432
17%
15%
8%
3%
72%
2%
10,093
17%
16%
7%
3%
72%
2%
31,150
21%
53%
26%
48%
66%
38%
11%
9%
42%
29%
43%
31%
16%
30%
62%
17%
12%
14%
41%
17%
45%
55%
56%
44%
3 33,122
292
0.89%
14%
62%
4%
18%
21,788
14%
63%
5%
17%
18,133
16%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
12,646
18%
16%
6%
3%
69%
4%
7,315
19%
18%
6%
4%
68%
4%
31,783
15%
61%
25%
57%
65%
31%
9%
11%
49%
35%
47%
30%
15%
19%
64%
22%
15%
16%
37%
10%
8%
92%
77%
23%
4 33,837
1,007
3.07%
23%
59%
2%
15%
20,694
22%
62%
2%
13%
18,305
24%
22%
4%
4%
67%
2%
12,062
26%
24%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,857
28%
26%
4%
5%
62%
2%
33,254
19%
55%
26%
63%
61%
22%
19%
11%
48%
43%
45%
26%
12%
25%
58%
31%
19%
14%
31%
5%
19%
81%
86%
14%
5 33,579
749
2.28%
27%
54%
3%
15%
21,363
25%
56%
4%
13%
18,170
27%
25%
4%
4%
63%
3%
12,186
28%
26%
5%
4%
60%
3%
7,013
32%
30%
4%
4%
57%
3%
35,621
19%
59%
21%
55%
57%
26%
27%
9%
38%
40%
51%
23%
7%
25%
63%
25%
20%
14%
34%
6%
25%
75%
86%
14%
6 32,289
-541
-1.65%
10%
76%
1%
11%
23,118
11%
77%
3%
9%
20,871
10%
10%
5%
1%
83%
1%
15,279
11%
10%
5%
2%
82%
1%
9,552
12%
11%
5%
2%
81%
1%
33,719
21%
53%
25%
50%
73%
34%
7%
6%
54%
28%
47%
28%
18%
30%
62%
17%
13%
16%
36%
17%
56%
44%
53%
47%
Total
196,980
1,812
5.52%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 18:29 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
560 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
Sonora
Ave
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four year terms: Districts 3 (Brotman),
4 (Najarian) and 6 (Asatryan)
2026, two year term: either 1 (vacant) or 2 (vacant)
2028: Districts 1, 2 and 5 (Devine & Kassakhian)
©2021 CALIPER
561 of 606
Map 135
District 1
Total Pop 32,380
Deviation from ideal -450
% Deviation -1.37%
% Hisp 28.7%
% NH White 52%
% NH Black 3%
% Asian-American 14%
Total 20,618
% Hisp 28%
% NH White 54%
% NH Black 4%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13%
Total 16,976
% Latino est. 29%
% Spanish-Surnamed 27%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 61%
% NH Black 4%
Total 11,438
% Latino est. 30%
% Spanish-Surnamed 28%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 59%
% NH Black 4%
Total 6,661
% Latino est. 33%
% Spanish-Surnamed 31%
% Asian-Surnamed 4%
% Filipino-Surnamed 4%
% NH White est. 56%
% NH Black est. 4%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 34,103
age0-19 19%
age20-60 58%
age60plus 23%
immigrants 55%
naturalized 56%
english 27%
spanish 29%
asian-lang 9%
other lang 35%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 40%
hs-grad 49%
bachelor 22%
graduatedegree 8%
Child in Household child-under18 24%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 62%
income 0-25k 27%
income 25-50k 20%
income 50-75k 14%
income 75-200k 33%
income 200k-plus 6%
single family 22%
multi-family 78%
rented 87%
owned 13%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 32,788
-42
-0.13%
22%
58%
2%
16%
19,900
21%
62%
2%
13%
17,851
24%
21%
4%
4%
68%
2%
11,760
25%
23%
4%
5%
65%
2%
6,619
27%
25%
5%
5%
62%
2%
32,298
19%
56%
25%
62%
61%
21%
19%
11%
49%
44%
45%
26%
12%
26%
59%
29%
19%
14%
33%
5%
17%
83%
86%
14%
3 33,352
522
1.59%
15%
63%
2%
19%
21,980
13%
66%
4%
16%
20,885
16%
15%
8%
3%
72%
2%
15,331
17%
16%
8%
3%
71%
2%
9,869
17%
16%
8%
3%
71%
2%
32,671
19%
54%
27%
50%
65%
34%
9%
10%
47%
31%
43%
31%
16%
26%
61%
20%
13%
14%
38%
15%
37%
63%
61%
39%
4 32,924
94 0.29%
13%
62%
1%
22%
22,254
13%
66%
1%
19%
22,971
10%
9%
10%
2%
78%
1%
18,155
10%
10%
9%
2%
78%
1%
12,628
10%
10%
8%
2%
80%
1%
31,670
25%
50%
25%
39%
83%
49%
8%
15%
28%
17%
40%
31%
24%
36%
65%
12%
9%
11%
43%
24%
72%
28%
33%
67%
5 32,862
32 0.10%
11%
74%
1%
11%
23,820
11%
77%
3%
9%
21,581
11%
10%
5%
2%
81%
1%
15,989
12%
11%
5%
2%
80%
1%
10,141
13%
12%
5%
2%
79%
1%
33,644
22%
53%
26%
51%
75%
35%
7%
5%
53%
27%
46%
28%
18%
31%
62%
17%
13%
14%
37%
19%
63%
37%
48%
52%
6 32,674
-156
-0.48%
14%
64%
3%
18%
21,145
14%
63%
4%
18%
18,138
15%
14%
6%
3%
73%
4%
12,527
17%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
7,149
18%
17%
6%
3%
69%
4%
32,126
16%
61%
23%
55%
63%
32%
9%
11%
48%
35%
49%
29%
15%
21%
65%
20%
16%
17%
38%
9%
12%
88%
78%
22%
Total
196,980
972
2.96%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 18:43 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
562 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
W Kenneth Rd
N Glen
dal
e
Ave
W
estern Ave
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four year terms: Districts 1 (Najarian)
2 (Brotman), 3 (Asatryan) and either 4 (vacant)
or 5 (vacant)
2026, two year terms: the other of 4 (vacant) and
5 (vacant)
2028: Districts 6 (Kassakhian), 7 (Devine) and the
two-year term district
©2021 CALIPER
563 of 606
Map 136
District 1
Total Pop 28,138
Deviation from ideal -2
% Deviation -0.01%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 24%
Total 19,139
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 66%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 19,448
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 15,369
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 10,741
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 27,271
age0-19 26%
age20-60 49%
age60plus 25%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 82%
english 49%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 26%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 17%
hs-grad 39%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 24%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 22%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 34%
owned 66%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 27,262
-878
-3.12%
14%
64%
2%
19%
18,256
13%
65%
4%
17%
18,848
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
2%
14,629
14%
13%
8%
3%
74%
1%
9,814
14%
13%
8%
2%
74%
1%
26,200
23%
52%
25%
42%
69%
45%
8%
8%
38%
21%
39%
34%
20%
31%
64%
11%
10%
12%
41%
25%
62%
38%
40%
60%
3 28,948
808
2.87%
14%
65%
3%
16%
19,049
14%
65%
3%
17%
16,533
15%
14%
5%
3%
74%
4%
11,607
16%
15%
6%
3%
71%
4%
6,918
17%
16%
5%
3%
71%
3%
28,747
16%
58%
26%
55%
65%
30%
8%
10%
51%
35%
48%
29%
16%
21%
62%
22%
16%
16%
37%
9%
12%
88%
74%
26%
4 28,950
810
2.88%
19%
61%
2%
16%
17,469
19%
65%
2%
14%
15,600
22%
20%
4%
4%
68%
3%
10,193
24%
22%
4%
5%
65%
3%
5,597
26%
24%
4%
5%
63%
3%
28,323
18%
55%
26%
63%
61%
22%
15%
10%
53%
45%
47%
25%
11%
24%
58%
31%
18%
16%
31%
4%
14%
86%
89%
11%
5 28,562
422
1.50%
29%
52%
2%
14%
17,870
28%
55%
2%
14%
14,743
29%
27%
4%
4%
62%
3%
9,707
31%
28%
4%
5%
60%
3%
5,700
34%
31%
4%
4%
57%
3%
29,969
19%
59%
22%
58%
56%
23%
28%
10%
39%
43%
48%
23%
9%
25%
61%
28%
19%
13%
35%
5%
19%
81%
88%
12%
6 28,208
68 0.24%
21%
58%
3%
16%
18,576
19%
59%
6%
13%
15,892
22%
20%
6%
3%
66%
3%
10,992
24%
22%
6%
4%
64%
3%
6,389
27%
25%
6%
4%
61%
3%
28,316
18%
59%
22%
54%
64%
30%
20%
10%
40%
35%
50%
26%
10%
23%
65%
24%
18%
14%
34%
9%
26%
74%
80%
20%
7 26,912
-1,228
-4.36%
9%
77%
1%
11%
19,359
10%
80%
2%
8%
17,338
9%
9%
5%
1%
84%
1%
12,703
10%
9%
5%
1%
83%
1%
7,908
11%
10%
5%
1%
82%
1%
27,685
21%
53%
25%
52%
77%
32%
6%
5%
57%
28%
45%
28%
19%
31%
62%
16%
13%
16%
35%
20%
63%
37%
48%
52%
Total
196,980
2,038
7.24%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 18:53 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
564 of 606
Foothill Blvd
Honolulu Ave
N Verdugo Rd
E Glenoaks Blvd
La Crescenta Ave
E Palmer Ave
W Colorado St
W Maple St
W Los Feliz Rd
W Chevy Chase Dr
San Fernando Rd
S Glenoaks Blvd
S Chevy Chase D
r
W Kenneth Rd
N
Central Ave
W
estern Ave
N
Pacific Ave
N
Brand Bl
vd
Grandview
Ave
W Broadway
W Mountain St
Santa Carlotta St
Dunsmore Ave
5 210
Glendale Districting
National Demographics Corporation, October 3, 2023
Proposed Election Sequence:
2026, four year terms: Districts 1 (Najarian)
7 (Brotman), 3 (Asatryan) and either 5 (vacant)
or 6 (vacant)
2026, two year terms: the other of 5 (vacant) and
6 (vacant)
2028: Districts 4 (Kassakhian), 2 (Devine) and the
two-year term district
©2021 CALIPER
565 of 606
Map 137
District 1
Total Pop 28,308
Deviation from ideal 168
% Deviation 0.60%
% Hisp 12.9%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 24%
Total 19,093
% Hisp 14%
% NH White 67%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 19%
Total 19,517
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 11%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 15,467
% Latino est. 11%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 10%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 10,765
% Latino est. 10%
% Spanish-Surnamed 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 79%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 27,277
age0-19 26%
age20-60 50%
age60plus 24%
immigrants 38%
naturalized 82%
english 48%
spanish 9%
asian-lang 16%
other lang 28%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 18%
hs-grad 39%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 37%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 13%
income 25-50k 9%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 44%
income 200k-plus 24%
single family 70%
multi-family 30%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.
Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.
Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. 2 27,814
-326
-1.16%
12%
72%
2%
12%
19,534
13%
73%
3%
10%
18,389
12%
11%
5%
2%
80%
2%
13,888
13%
12%
5%
2%
79%
2%
9,083
13%
12%
5%
2%
79%
2%
28,818
21%
53%
26%
48%
69%
40%
7%
6%
47%
24%
43%
31%
20%
28%
62%
14%
12%
12%
43%
19%
48%
52%
49%
51%
3 28,285
145
0.52%
11%
70%
2%
15%
19,250
12%
71%
3%
14%
16,060
13%
12%
5%
2%
77%
2%
11,097
14%
13%
6%
2%
76%
2%
6,286
15%
15%
6%
2%
74%
2%
27,982
18%
58%
24%
58%
71%
27%
8%
9%
57%
37%
50%
26%
14%
26%
62%
21%
16%
18%
33%
11%
25%
75%
73%
27%
4 28,086
-54
-0.19%
25%
55%
3%
16%
17,766
23%
57%
5%
14%
15,526
25%
23%
5%
4%
64%
3%
10,574
26%
24%
5%
4%
62%
3%
6,200
29%
27%
5%
4%
59%
2%
28,435
20%
57%
23%
55%
63%
26%
26%
11%
37%
37%
50%
25%
8%
26%
64%
27%
20%
15%
32%
7%
27%
73%
81%
19%
5 28,833
693
2.46%
28%
54%
2%
14%
18,130
26%
57%
2%
14%
15,503
28%
25%
4%
4%
63%
3%
10,321
29%
27%
4%
5%
61%
3%
6,090
32%
29%
3%
4%
59%
3%
29,880
19%
58%
23%
58%
58%
24%
26%
10%
40%
41%
47%
24%
11%
25%
62%
26%
19%
12%
36%
6%
19%
81%
86%
14%
6 28,361
221
0.79%
16%
64%
2%
16%
17,805
15%
67%
5%
13%
14,900
17%
16%
5%
3%
72%
4%
9,815
20%
18%
5%
3%
69%
3%
5,364
22%
20%
5%
4%
66%
3%
28,126
15%
60%
25%
63%
61%
25%
9%
8%
57%
44%
48%
26%
11%
19%
59%
31%
15%
17%
31%
5%
9%
91%
87%
13%
7 27,293
-847
-3.01%
15%
61%
2%
21%
18,140
15%
62%
3%
18%
18,507
15%
14%
8%
4%
73%
1%
14,038
15%
14%
9%
4%
72%
1%
9,279
15%
14%
8%
3%
73%
1%
25,994
22%
52%
26%
42%
68%
42%
11%
11%
37%
24%
41%
33%
18%
30%
63%
14%
12%
13%
40%
21%
58%
42%
47%
53%
Total
196,980
1,540
5.47%
17%
62%
2%
17%
129,718
17%
65%
3%
15%
118,402
17%
15%
6%
3%
73%
2%
85,200
17%
16%
6%
3%
72%
2%
53,067
18%
17%
6%
3%
71%
2%
196,512
20%
55%
25%
52%
66%
33%
14%
10%
43%
32%
46%
28%
15%
27%
62%
21%
15%
14%
37%
13%
36%
64%
66%
34%
10/03/2023 19:51 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
566 of 606
NDC 10/3/2023
Armenian Voter Percentage of Total Registered Voters
Maps 101 - 137 (Red maps are not population balanced maps) District 1234567 Total
Map 101 29% 31% 36% 35% 22% 38% n/a 32%
Map 102 29% 33% 37% 33% 21% 38% n/a 32%
Map 103 26% 27% 45% 33% 37% 22% n/a 32%
Map 104 33% 39% 36% 31% 29% 18% n/a 32%
Map 105 32% 30% 39% 37% 31% 22% n/a 32%
Map 106 42% 23% 31% 27% 31% 37% n/a 32%
Map 106b 42% 22% 32% 27% 31% 37% n/a 32%
Map 107 32% 29% 39% 37% 30% 23% n/a 32%
Map 108 32% 29% 40% 36% 29% 24% n/a 32%
Map 109 32% 29% 39% 36% 32% 23% n/a 32%
Map 110 32% 29% 40% 35% 31% 23% n/a 32%
Map 111 37% 22% 36% 33% 30% n/a n/a 32%
Map 112 37% 18% 42% 33% 34% 29% 29% 32%
Map 113 32% 29% 39% 37% 30% 23% n/a 32%
Map 114 29% 32% 42% 33% 31% 23% n/a 32%
Map 115 26% 29% 38% 24% 35% 40% n/a 32%
Map 116 22% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 32%
Map 117 37% 39% 35% 29% 28% 22% n/a 32%
Map 118 22% 38% 27% 38% 29% 38% n/a 32%
Map 119 28% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 32%
Map 120 22% 27% 29% 42% 36% 35% n/a 32%
Map 120b 22% 27% 29% 42% 35% 35% n/a 32%
Map 121 22% 32% 29% 40% 31% 37% n/a 32%
Map 122 28% 37% 32% 43% 30% 22% n/a 32%
Map 123 32% 31% 36% 29% 29% 34% n/a 32%
Map 124 21% 37% 38% 34% 28% 34% n/a 32%
Map 125 23% 31% 34% 43% 32% 29% n/a 32%
Map 126 22% 41% 36% 29% 32% 31% n/a 32%
Map 127 26% 39% 28% 33% n/a n/a n/a 32%
Map 128 22% 42% 29% 34% 32% 32% n/a 32%
Map 129 29% 37% 29% 30% 44% 22% n/a 32%
Map 130 24% 40% 30% 33% n/a n/a n/a 32%
Map 131 29% 40% 24% 33% n/a n/a n/a 32%
Map 132 23% 42% 28% 34% 33% n/a n/a 32%
Map 133 27% 40% 37% 22% 33% n/a n/a 32%
Map 134 22% 30% 34% 33% 29% 43% n/a 32%
Map 135 26% 33% 31% 23% 41% 36% n/a 32%
Map 136 20% 29% 35% 36% 27% 32% 45% 32%
Map 137 20% 38% 41% 30% 27% 39% 29% 32%
567 of 606
________________ = Sections with changes
THE CHARTER
Article IV. Officers and Employees Generally.
Sec. 1. Generally.
Sec. 2. Elective officers to be subject to recall.
Sec. 3. Compensation.
Sec. 4. Appointment and removal of department heads, subordinate officers, etc., generally.
Sec. 5. Delegation of ministerial duties.
Sec. 1. Generally.
(a) The officers of the City of Glendale shall be five (5) members of the council, a city assessor, a city tax collector, a city manager, a director of administrative services, a city clerk, a city treasurer, a city attorney, a director of public works, a city engineer, a maintenance services administrator, a building official, a chief of police and a fire chief. Notwithstanding the previous sentence concerning the number of members of the council, commencing with the 2026 general municipal election, the officers shall include a mayor and six (6) council members elected as provided in Article V, Section 6 of this Charter. The council may also provide by ordinance for additional offices and for the duties thereof, and for additional duties of offices herein provided for, but in no such manner as to encroach upon the duties of any officer as provided for by this Charter.
The council may also provide by ordinance for such subordinate officers, assistants, deputies, clerks, and employees in the several offices and departments as they deem necessary. The members of the council, the five (5) members of the council, the city treasurer and the city clerk shall be elected from the city at largeat-large, as provided in this Charter. Commencing with the 2026 general municipal election, the mayor shall be directly elected by the voters of the City and six (6) council members shall be elected by district as set forth in Article V, Section 6 of this Charter. (b) Members of the City Council in office at the time the 2024 amendments to this Charter take effect shall continue in office until the expiration of their respective terms of office and until their successors are qualified. Recall proceedings, if any, of such City Council members serving the remainder of a term pursuant to this provision, and the election of a successor to such City Council member to complete that term, shall be conducted at-large. Vacancies in such offices shall be filled from the City at-large in accordance with the provisions of this Charter.
(c) All other officers, assistants, deputies, clerks and employees shall be appointed as provided in this Charter, or as the council may provide by ordinance in case no 568 of 606
provision for their appointment is herein made, and shall hold their respective offices or positions at the pleasure of the appointing power. Where the appointment of any of said officers, assistants, deputies, clerks or employees is vested in the council or any commission, such appointment and any removal must be made by a three-fifths (3/5) vote of the members of the appointing power.
Sec. 2. Elective officers to be subject to recall. (Operative upon the certification of the 2026 general municipal election)
All elective officers of the city shall be subject to recall as provided in this Charter.
Commencing after certification of the November 2026 general municipal election, recall proceedings of Council Members elected by the City’s voters at-large shall be conducted in the City at-large as provided in Article IV, Section 1(b). Recall proceedings of Council Members elected by-district shall be conducted by-district by the voters within the boundaries of the district by-which the Council Member was elected. * For Charter provision as to adoption of state law relative to recall, see Charter, Art. XVIII, § 1.
Sec. 3. Compensation.
(a) Compensation and increase in compensation of mayor and council members.
Until ___________, Ccompensation for council members is hereby set, and from time to time shall be changed, in accordance with the schedule and procedure for adjustment applicable to the City of Glendale set forth in the provisions of the Government Code relating to salaries of council members in general law cities. The compensation of council members may also be increased during the terms of their respective offices by vote of the electors.
Beginning ________, the members of the council, except the mayor, shall receive an annual salary in the sum equal to eighty percent (80%) of the annual area median income and the mayor shall receive an annual salary equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the area median Income. In addition, the mayor and each member of the council shall receive reimbursement on order of the council for authorized traveling and other expenses when on official duty upon submission of an itemized expense account therefor, or may receive an advance for such purposes subject to such accounting. In addition, members shall receive such uniform, reasonable and adequate amount as may be established by ordinance, which amount shall be deemed to be reimbursement to them of other routine and ordinary expenses and costs imposed upon them by virtue of their serving as members of council, including the mayor.
As used herein, the term “area median income” shall refer to the annual area median income for a one-person household within Los Angeles County as determined and set by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or, if the Housing and Urban Development area median income determination is not available for 569 of 606
any reason, by a comparable index published by the state of California. The mayor and council member salaries shall also be adjusted each year as of the first day of April based on changes in the area median income.
(b) Compensation and increase in compensation of city clerk and city treasurer.
When percentage increases are granted to other officers and employees generally, the council may grant comparable percentage increases to the city clerk and the city treasurer. The compensation of the city clerk and city treasurer may also be increased during the terms of their respective offices by vote of the electors.
Article V. Elections.
Sec. 1. General municipal elections.
Sec. 2. Procedures for conducting elections.
Sec. 3. Canvass of elections.
Sec. 4. Notifying the successful candidates.
Sec. 5. (Repealed).
Sec. 6. Terms of elective officers; term limits of councilmembers and mayor.
Sec. 6. Terms of elective officers; term limits of mayor and council members.
(a) From and after the general municipal election to be held in 202400, the two (2) members of the council receiving the highest number of votes citywide for said offices respectively shall hold office for terms of four (4) years commencing at eight p.m. (8:00 P.M.) on the date the council certifies the results of the election and until their successors are elected and qualified. From and after the general municipal election of 2022, the clerk and treasurer elected and the three (3) members of the council then elected shall hold office for terms of four (4) years commencing at eight p.m. (8:00 P.M.) on the date the council certifies the results of the election and until their successors are elected and qualified.
(b) Commencing with the general municipal election to be held in 2026, the clerk, the treasurer, and the mayor shall be directly elected by the voters of the City and fourthree (43) council members shall be elected by district for terms of four (4) years commencing at eight p.m. (8:00 P.M.) on the date the council certifies the results of the election and until their successors qualify. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, at the City Council meeting where these four members are sworn in, the City Council shall select by casting of lots one member elected at the November 2026 general election to hold office for a term of two (2) years and until his or her successor qualifies.
Thereafter, the three (3) members of the City Council (the two (2) elected at-large at the 570 of 606
general municipal election in 2024 and the one elected by-district at the general municipal election in 2026 and selected for a term of two (2) years) shall be elected by- district at the general municipal election held in 2028 for terms of four (4) years commencing at eight p.m. (8:00 P.M.) on the date the council certifies the results of the election and until their successors qualify
Any person elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the unexpired term.
In the election of councilmembers where full terms and one (1) or more unexpired terms are to be filled, no distinction shall be made in nominating or voting between the full terms and the unexpired terms, but the person or persons elected by the highest number of votes shall be elected for the full term or terms and the person or persons receiving the next highest vote shall be elected for the unexpired term or terms, as the case may be.
(b) No person may serve more than three (3) terms of office as a council member of the city council, either by election or appointment, which terms do not count as terms of office as mayor. No person may serve more than two (2) terms as mayor, either by election or appointment, which two terms do not count as “terms of office as a council member”. Theseis limitations on the number of terms of office shall not apply to any unexpired term to which a person is elected or appointed as mayor or to council member ifunless the remainder of the term is less more than one-half of the full term of office. The limit on council member terms and shall apply only to terms of office that began on or after April 4, 2017.
Article VI. The Council and Mayor Generally.
Sec. 1. Vesting of legislative power; qualifications of candidates. Sec. 2. Council districts
Sec. 3. Eligibility
Sec. 4. Presiding officer, mayor
Sec. 5. Interference in administrative matters
Sec. 6 Council meetings.
Sec. 73. Quorum: Action franchises, etc.
Sec. 84. General powers of the council.
Sec. 95. Certain powers and duties enumerated.
Sec. 106. Ordinances generally.
571 of 606
Sec. 117. When ordinances go into effect.
Sec. 128. Amending ordinances.
Sec. 139. Contracts
Sec. 140. Authority of the council to provide procedure by which city may bid on certain public works.
Sec. 151. Official advertising.
Sec. 162. Councilmembers holding other city offices.
Sec. 173. Vacancies in elective offices.
Sec. 184. Committees of council.
Sec. 195. Required vote on sale of real estate; limitation on term of lease. Sec. 2016. Certified public accountant to be employed annually. Sec. 2117. Official bonds.
Sec. 2218. Official oaths.
Sec. 2319. Duties of city clerk.
Sec. 1. Vesting of legislative power; qualifications of candidates. (Operative upon the certification of the 2026 general municipal election) The legislative power of the City of Glendale shall be vested in the people through the initiative and referendum, and in a body to be designated “The Council.” Commencing upon the certification of the general municipal election in 2026 and the swearing in of elected officers elected during that election, the Council shall be comprised of a mayor directly elected by all the voters of the City at large and six (6) council members elected by- district, as set forth in this charter. The term “ The Council,” “legislative body,” or other similar terms as used in this Charter or any other provision of law shall be deemed to refer to the collective body composed of the mayor and council members unless such other provision of this charter or other provision of law expressly provides to the contrary or unless such interpretation would be clearly contrary to the intent and context of such other provision.
Sec. 2. Council districts
For the purpose of electing council members commencing with the 2026 general municipal election, the City shall be divided into single-member districts equal in number to the number of council members, exclusive of the mayor (each such district a “district” and, collectively, “districts”). Said districts shall be in compliance with applicable laws and such other permissible criteria as the council may specify by ordinance or resolution. The districts in effect at the 2026 general municipal election and until a 572 of 606
subsequent redistricting required by law shall be those adopted by ordinance adopting the districts contingent upon voter approval of the 2024 amendment to the charter modifying this section.
Following each decenni al federal census, the council shall, by ordinance or resolution, adjust the boundaries of any or all of the districts of the City so that the districts shall be as nearly equal in population as may be, consistent with law applicable to the creation and rearrangement of the boundaries of local districts. No ordinance or resolution authorized by this section that would change district boundaries created by a prior ordinance or resolution may be adopted within 180 days prior to any general municipal election.
Sec. 3. Eligibility
No person shall be eligible to hold office as the mayor or a council member unless he or she is and shall have been a resident and qualified elector of the City and, with respect to members of the council elected by-district, of the district of which he or she seeks office at the time of, and for the thirty-day period immediately preceding, filing of his or her nominating papers or such other equivalent declaration of candidacy as may be required or authorized by law, or at the time of, and for the thirty- day period immediately preceding, his or her appointment to such office.
Every council member shall be and remain a qualified voter of the district by which he or she seeks office from the time of filing nomination papers or such other equivalent declaration of candidacy as may be required or authorized by law, throughout the full term of his or her office, if elected or appointed in lieu of election. No creation of a District or change in the boundary or location of any District shall abolish or terminate the term of office of any City Council member prior to the expiration of the term of office for which the member was elected or appointed in lieu of election, notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter.
Sec. 4. Presiding officer, mayor (Operative upon certification of 2026 general municipal election).
The mayor shall be a member of the council and shall preside over the meetings of the council. The mayor shall have voice and vote in all of the council's proceedings.
As a voting member of council, the mayor shall not have veto power over any council action. The mayor shall sign official documents when the signature of the council or mayor is required by law and shall be recognized as the official head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes. The mayor shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this Charter, or imposed by the council by resolution or in the council’s by-laws, consistent with the office of mayor. [ALTERNATIVE 1 – NO DOUBLE FILING FOR MAYOR AND CM] The mayor shall be directly elected by the voters of the City. The mayor shall serve for a term of four years and until his or her successor is qualified. No person may be a candidate for 573 of 606
mayor and a candidate for any other office on the council in the same election. In the event an incumbent council member other than the mayor is elected mayor , such council member shall assume the office of mayor and shall resign from the office of council member at the time that person assumes office as mayor and the council shall fill the vacancy in the office of council member in the manner set forth in this Charter.
When the mayor is absent from any meeting of the council, the mayor pro tem shall be selected monthly by alphabetical rotation. The mayor pro tem shall act as the mayor if the mayor is absent or unavailable.
[ALTERNATIVE 2 – DOUBLE FILING PERMITTED] The mayor shall be directly elected by the voters of the City. The mayor shall serve for a term of four years and until his or her successor is qualified. An incumbent council member may run for mayor and also for re-election as a district council member if otherwise qualified. In the event an incumbent council member other than the mayor is elected mayor or an incumbent council member is elected mayor and re-elected to a district seat on the City Council, such council member shall assume the office of mayor and shall resign from the office of council member at the time that person assumes office as mayor and the council shall fill the vacancy in the office of council member in the manner set forth in this Charter. When the mayor is absent from any meeting of the council, the mayor pro tem shall be selected monthly by alphabetical rotation. The mayor pro tem shall act as the mayor if the mayor is absent or unavailable.
Sec. 5. Interference in administrative matters
Except for the purpose of inquiry, the council and its members, including the mayor, shall deal with the administrative function of the City government solely through the city manager or their designated assistant, and neither the council nor any member thereof, including the mayor, shall give orders to any subordinates of the city manager, either publicly or privately. Neither the council nor any of its members, including the mayor, shall direct or request the appointment of any person to, or their removal from, an office by the city manager or by any of their subordinates, or in any manner take part in the appointment or removal of officers and employees, except as specifically provided in this Charter.
Sec. 73. Quorum: Action franchises, etc. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
Three Four (43) members of the council shall constitute a quorum, but a less number may adjourn from time to time. No franchise shall be granted, ordinance passed, budget adopted, supplemented or amended, appropriation made, or payment of money ordered unless three four (43) members of the council concur in such action.
Any tie vote constitutes no action, and the matter shall be carried from agenda to agenda until the tie is broken, or the council determines to remove item from agenda. 574 of 606
Sec. 95. Certain powers and duties enumerated. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
The council shall:
1. Qualifications of Members and Election Returns. Judge the qualifications of its members and all election returns;
2. Rules of Proceedings. Establish rules for its proceedings;
3. Record of Proceedings. Cause a correct record of its proceedings to be kept.
The ayes and noes shall on demand of any member, be taken and entered therein, and they shall be recorded on all votes passing any ordinance or appointing or dismissing or confirming the appointment or dismissal of any officer, or authorizing the execution of contracts, or the appropriation or payment of money;
4. Mayor Generally. Choose one (1) of its members as presiding officer, to be called mayor. The mayor shall preside over the sessions of the council, shall sign official documents when the signature of the council or mayor is required by law, and he shall act as the official head of the city on public and ceremonial occasions. He shall have power to administer oaths and affirmations. When the mayor is absent from any meeting of the council, the mayor pro tem shall be selected monthly by alphabetical rotation. The mayor pro tem shall act as mayor if the mayor is absent or unavailable;
5. Appointment of Certain Officers. Appoint a city assessor, which office may be combined with that of the city clerk, a city tax collector, a city attorney, and city manager;
65. Supervision of Public Utilities. Exercise general supervision and direction over all persons, firms, companies and corporations owning, controlling or operating public utilities, in so far as any of them are subject to municipal control. This provision is subject to other Charter provisions relative to such public utilities as now are or may hereafter be owned by the city.
Sec. 162. Councilmembers holding other city offices. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
No A councilmember, including the mayor, or mayor shall not hold any other city office or city employment except as authorized by State law or ordinarily necessary in the performance of the duties as a councilmember. No former councilmember or former mayor shall hold any appointed, compensated city office or city employment until two (2) years after leaving the office of mayor or councilmember or mayor.
575 of 606
Sec. 173. Vacancies in elective offices. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
Any member of the council, including the mayor, who is absent from all meetings thereof for two consecutive months, unless excused by the council, shall forfeit his seat.
Any vacancy occurring in the council, including the mayor, shall be filled by a majority vote of the remaining members of the council or by special election called by the council as required herein. Any vacancy occurring in any other elective office shall be filled by a majority vote of the whole council.
The person appointed to fill a vacancy in any elective office shall serve until his successor is elected and qualified; provided, that where the term of the office to which such person is appointed expires on the second Monday following the next general municipal election to be held after the occurring of the vacancy, such personal shall serve for the remainder of the unexpired term.
If the term of the office to which such person is appointed does not expire on the second Monday following the next general municipal election to be held after the occurring of the vacancy, and the nomination period for the next general municipal election has not commenced, then at said next general municipal election a successor shall be elected, otherwise, such personal so appointed shall hold office for the remainder of the unexpired term.
Council shall make an appointment within thirty days of the vacancy. If an appointment is not made within thirty days, then council shall immediately call for a special election to be held within one hundred twenty (120) days for the purpose of filling such vacancy, unless the earliest next general election is no more than one hundred eighty (180) days from the call for special election.
A vacancy in a City Council seat whose council member was elected at-large shall be filled from the City at-large. A vacancy in a City Council seat whose council member was elected by-district shall be filled by-district.
The council shall appoint such standing and other committees as it deems necessary.
Sec. 195. Required vote on sale of real estate; limitation on term of lease. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
With the exception of city owned SR zoned property or property dedicated as park land of five (5) or more acres, no sale of real estate shall be authorized by the council except by ordinance passed by the affirmative vote of five-fifths (4/5) of all the members of the whole council and no lease shall be made for a period of longer than five (5) 576 of 606
years, except by ordinance adopted by the council. City owned SR zoned property or property dedicated as park land which property is either an individual parcel of five (5) acres or more, or parcels which are adjoining and collectively equal or exceed five (5) or more acres shall not be sold or transferred except upon approval of a majority of the voters at an election held for such purpose. For purposes of this Charter, “dedicated park land” means property now owned or hereafter acquired by the city which has been either dedicated by ordinance, zoned SR, or where the documents executed for the acquisition thereof provide that the acquisition is in whole or in part for preservation or use as open space or recreational purposes of any type. For purposes of this Charter “sold or transferred” does not mean or include an easement, or an acquisition of property either jointly with another public agency or with grant funds provided by another public agency where the property is required to be conveyed to the other public agency for the purpose of preserving the property as open space or recreational purposes.
Article IX. City Manager.
Sec. 1. City manager selection, compensation and qualifications. Sec. 2. Procedure in case of disability of city manager. Sec. 3. Purchases.
Sec. 4. Assistant city manager.
Sec. 1. City manager selection, compensation and qualifications. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
The council shall appoint a city manager who:
(a) Shall serve at the pleasure of the council;
(b) Shall be the chief administrative officer of the city; (c) Shall be chosen on the basis of administrative qualifications; (d) Shall be compensated as directed by the council commensurate with the responsibilities of the office;
(e) Shall not have served on the council within a period of two (2) years immediately preceding the date of appointment;
(f) Shall establish, within ninety (90) days of the effective date of appointment, and maintain a residence within the city;
(g) Shall engage in no other business or occupation, except as may be permitted by the council;
577 of 606
(h) Appoint and remove at his pleasure, a secretary.
The appointment of the city manager requires the affirmative vote of three four (43) members of the council. An action to remove, suspend, or request the resignation of the city manager, requires the affirmative votes of three four (43) members of the council, provided, however, that during a period of one hundred thirty-five (135) days after a councilmanic election the council shall take no action to remove, suspend or request the resignation of the city manager, except by a unanimous vote of the entire council.
Article XI. Fiscal Administration
Sec. 1. Powers and duties of director of administrative services generally. Sec. 2. Duties of city treasurer generally.
Sec. 3. Presentation of demands; petty cash funds.
Sec. 4. Procedure as to warrants on treasurer; authority of council as to presentation, approval and payment of demands against city. Sec. 5. Payments from treasury generally; demand as prerequisite to action against city.
Sec. 6. Fiscal year; proposed budgets and estimates of revenues and expenditures generally.
Sec. 7. Hearing on proposed budgets; modification and adoption of budgets. Sec. 8. Transfer of unused balances; appropriation of available revenues not included in annual budget.
Sec. 9. Authority of council to provide for system of taxation; tax liens; authority of council to designate assessor and tax collector.
Sec. 10. Assessment, collection, etc., of taxes by officers of County of Los Angeles.
Sec. 11. Tax rate; special taxes generally; additional annual taxes. Sec. 12. Special taxes and bonds.
Sec. 13. Limit on bonded indebtedness.
Sec. 14. General budget fund.
Sec. 15. General reserve fund.
Sec. 16. Appropriations and expenditures for entertaining, advertising, etc. Sec. 17. Waterworks depreciation fund; electric works depreciation fund. Sec. 18. Special deposit fund.
578 of 606
Sec. 19. General service fund.
Sec. 20. Waterworks revenue fund; electric works revenue fund. Sec. 21. Glendale Water and Power sinking fund.
Sec. 22. Glendale Water and Power surplus fund—Generally.
Sec. 8. Transfer of unused balances; appropriation of available revenues not included in annual budget. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
At any meeting after the adoption of the budget or budgets, the council, by at least four (4) affirmative votes of at least fourthree (43) members, may amend or supplement such budget or budgets, so as to authorize the transfer of unused balances appropriated for one purpose to another purpose, or to appropriate available revenues not included in the annual budget.
Article XV. City Planning.
Sec. 1. (Repealed).
Sec. 2. Amendment, etc., of regulations adopted pursuant to Charter, Article III, Section 2, subdivisions 19 and 20.
Sec. 2. Amendment, etc., of regulations adopted pursuant to Charter, Article III, Section 2, subdivisions 19 and 20. (Operative upon certification of 2026 general election).
The council may, from time to time, on its own motion, or on petition after hearing and public notice of such hearing given by one (1) publication in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the time of hearing, amend, supplement or change the regulations and districts established by any ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivisions 19 and 20 of Section 2, Article III, of this Charter. Whenever the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the frontage of any district or part thereof, shall present to the council a petition duly signed and acknowledged by them, requesting any such amendment, supplement, change or repeal of the regulations prescribed for such district, or part thereof, the council shall act upon such petition within ninety (90) days after the filing thereof. No amendment, change, supplement or repeal of the regulations or of the boundaries of districts established by any ordinance passed under the above- mentioned provisions of the Charter shall be made except by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the councilfive affirmative votes of the council, and if at the time of the hearing thereon a protest against such amendment, supplement, change or repeal is presented, duly signed and acknowledged by the owners of twenty (20) percent or more of the frontage 579 of 606
of property which will be directly affected by the proposed amendment, supplement, change or repeal, or by the owners of twenty (20) percent of the frontage of property which is immediately adjacent thereto, either in the rear, or the sides, or across the street, no such amendment, change, supplement or repeal shall be adopted except by unanimous vote of the council. When a petition has been denied in whole or in part, no petition for the amendment, change, supplement or repeal so denied may be filed within six (6) months after such denial. (Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)
Article XXIII. Miscellaneous Provisions.
Sec. 1. Authority of city manager to assign clerks, etc., to work in any department, etc.
Sec. 2. Application to city of general laws of state. Sec. 3. Definition of “city,” etc.
Sec. 4. (Repealed).
Sec. 5. Vacancy in city offices.
Sec. 6. Opening, etc., of streets; planting of trees; public improvement not elsewhere provided for in Charter; removal of dirt, rubbish, weeds, etc. Sec. 7. Delivery of papers, etc., to successors in office. Sec. 8. Prohibitions applicable to specified officers; Government Code sections adopted.
Sec. 9. Officers, etc., to be United States citizens. Sec. 10. Payment for nomination, etc., to office.
Sec. 11. Acceptance by officers, etc., of donation or gratuity from applicant, subordinate, etc., for position with city.
Sec. 12. Conduct prohibited to city officers and employees with reference to contracts; connivance with contractors.
Sec. 13. Approval, etc., by officer of unauthorized demand on treasury. Sec. 14. Payment into city treasury of moneys received from taxes, licenses, fees, etc.
Sec. 15. Inspection of books and records.
Sec. 16. Copies or extracts from books and records.
Sec. 17. Office hours for city officers.
580 of 606
Sec. 18. Continuation of ordinances and resolutions in force at effective date of Charter.
Sec. 19. Officers, etc., in office at effective date of Charter. Sec. 20. First election under Charter.
Sec. 21. Effect of adoption of Charter on vested rights, etc., of city. Sec. 22. Officers to report fees, etc., monthly.
Sec. 23. Severability clause applicable to Charter.
Sec. 24. Purchases from local merchants.
Sec. 25. Political activity or contributions on part of city manager, etc. Sec. 26. Vesting of city’s powers generally.
Sec. 27. Penalties, violation of ordinances.
Sec. 28. When Charter to take effect.
Sec. 29. Authority of city to establish a municipal court. Sec. 30. Administering oaths.
Sec. 5. Vacancy in city offices.
If any officer of the city shall die or remove from the city, or absent himself therefrom for more than thirty days consecutively, without the permission of the council, or if he shall fail to qualify by taking the oath of office and filing his official bonds, whenever such bond is required, within fifteen days from the time his certificate of election or appointment is mailed or delivered to him, or if he shall resign or be removed from office, or if his election shall be finally declared void by any competent tribunal, or if he shall be convicted of a felony, or if he shall be adjudged insane, or if he shall cease to discharge the duties of his office (other than that of member of the council) for two (2) consecutive months, unless prevented by sickness, his office shall become vacant.
This section does not apply to the offices of mayor and council member. 581 of 606
Exhibit 3
1 January 11, 10 a.m. – Glendale Latino Association Stakeholder Meeting Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Madeline Wilson
Annette Ghazarian
GLA Members
Anita Q Gabrielian
Leyla Anderson
Jennie Quinonez-Skinner
Ladonna Romans
Miryam Finkelberg
Meeting Discussion:
The Glendale Latino Association (GLA) Board members came into the meeting with varying levels of familiarity with the district formation process. Several have been following it very closely, while others have only heard about it.
The City’s Demographer, NDC, gave a brief overview of district formation and its history in the City of Glendale and shared that ultimately, the voters will choose whether to form districts or not. NDC also shared the districting website and walked through how to review the focus maps using the PDF files and interactive review map.
GLA discussed the maps and individuals shared their own opinions on what they consider best for the community, particularly the Latino population. Some expressed interest in having a district with the highest possible Latino population while others shared the benefits of having a diverse district and community.
GLA will bring districting to the full Board and discuss if they want to take a position as an organization. Individuals will also establish personal positions and share their feedback with the City.
582 of 606
Exhibit 3
2 January 22, 12 p.m. – Verdugo Woodlands HOA, Bridging the Borders, Glendale Teacher’s Association
Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Madeline Wilson
Stephanie Mkhlian
Mike Garcia
Verdugo Woodlands HOA
Vahe
Dave Cole
James Cypherd
Diane Morrison
Nancy Campbell
Catherine Jurca
Christine Sauceda
Bridging the Borders
Araik Sinanian
Glendale Teacher’s Association
Taline Arsenian
Meeting Discussion:
The three organizations came into the meeting with various levels of familiarity with the district formation process. Several individuals were hearing about the process for the first time while others had been involved and even submitted draft maps.
The City’s Demographer, NDC, gave a brief overview of district formation and its history in Glendale and shared the districting website, MapGlendale.org, to walk through the available information about the process and show the draft maps submitted by the public.
Participants discussed the district formation process and the reasons why the City of Glendale is considering making a change. Many expressed their personal opinions about district formation and how it would affect the City of Glendale. There were a variety of opinions, ranging from general support to no support of making the change.
No organization advocated for a specific map. Participants were encouraged to share their opinions with City Council if they want to take a position on the matter as the process continues.
David Kean
Marcia Hanford
Mary Lightfoot
Peggy L
Minerva Astengo
Roseanne Kalaba
Mary LaCroix
583 of 606
Exhibit 3
3 January 25, 6:30 p.m. – Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Jacob Lyle
Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association*
Mary-Lynne Fischer
Susan Bolyn
Robert Cable
Mark Weaver
Joyce Hart
Nancy Bohle
Bob and Marilyn Cable
Donna Libra
Betty Cady
Desirée Rabinov
Roxanne Myers
*Attendees only reflect those who signed in
Meeting Discussion:
The Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association (CHNA) members have had varying involvement in the district formation process. The president has been very involved and gave an introduction about the process before turning the meeting to the City’s Demographer (NDC).
NDC gave a brief explanation about the history of the process, the importance of community feedback and shared the draft maps with CHNA.
Members of CHNA discussed details about the draft maps to better understand what to review. Some members expressed concern that there is not much variation in how northern Glendale is formed into a district across the draft maps. CHNA was interested in the future timeline of the process and the logistics of how districts would work in Glendale.
The organization did not advocate for a specific map. Participants were invited to stay involved and share their opinions with City Council as the process continues. 584 of 606
Exhibit 3
4 February 5, 7:05 p.m. – Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Madeline Wilson
Mike Garcia
Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council
Grant Michals
Rondi
Allen Durham
Palma Vincenti
Richard Lee
Stephen Meek
Susan Bolan
Rachel Wolstan
Tom Hendricks
Joanna Linkchorst
Meeting Discussion:
The members of the Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council (GHCC) had varying levels of understanding about the district formation process. Some have been actively involved while others have only heard about it.
National Demographics Corporation (NDC) began the meeting by sharing the background of the process, the role of NDC and Tripepi Smith and why district formation is a topic of discussion in Glendale. NDC then walked through the focus maps and several other draft maps to give participants an understanding of what type of feedback City Council is looking for.
Members of GHCC discussed why the City, GCC and GUSD can’t have the same maps and shared concerns that the ambiance of the “Jewel City” will be lost in renter-dense districts. A representative of the Montecito Neighborhood Association expressed feeling a stronger connection with Crescenta Highlands than with Verdugo Woodlands and that they should be in a district with the north. A representative from Adams Hills shared that their organization prefers being with Glenoaks Canyon rather than renters.
GHCC leadership shared that it is difficult for them to take a stance as an organization.
However, their priority is that neighborhood associations are respected and kept together. Their leadership encouraged associations to get involved, meet with the districting team and share their feedback on parts of maps or whole maps they prefer.
Participants were invited by NDC and Tripepi Smith to share their feedback via email and attend the upcoming public forums.
585 of 606
Exhibit 3
5 February 8, 6:00 p.m. – Rossmoyne Mountain HOA
Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Mike Garcia
Skyler Addison
Rossmoyne Mountain HOA*
Suzanne McDonnell
Allen Arzoumanian
Jaime Gonzalez
Timothy
Laurel Perkman
Marc Perkman
*attendees only reflect those who signed in
Meeting Discussion:
The members of the Rossmoyne Mountain HOA (Rossmoyne) had varying knowledge about the district formation process prior to meeting with the City’s team.
National Demographics Corporation (NDC) began the meeting by sharing the districting website and its resources and explaining the background of district formation in the City of Glendale. Throughout the evening, NDC walked through the focus maps and answered questions from participants about the details of the process.
Rossmoyne members were very interested in understanding the politics of districting and asked questions about the reasons why Glendale is considering this change and the related legal requirements. Residents also discussed the impact districts would have on the City and what that would look like for them. Some residents expressed concern about the cost of moving to district elections and the outreach needed to reach all residents. NDC and the City Attorney shared some of the pros and cons of district formation and shared brief information related to the costs of the project requirements and the associated deliverables.
Rossmoyne discussed the focus maps, briefly touching on the possibility of creating renter-dense and Hispanic districts. Some residents expressed concern that heavy renter districts may not care to elect City Councilmembers. No stance was taken by individuals or the organization about a specific map. Rossmoyne members were invited to share their feedback about maps or the process in general with the City throughout the night.
586 of 606
Exhibit 3
6 February 15, 3:00 p.m. – Filipino-American Business Association of Glendale, Adams Hill Neighborhood Association, Armenian Bar Association Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Mike Garcia
Madeline Wilson
Filipino-American Business Association
Edith Fuentes
Arleen Penaflor
Adams Hills Neighborhood Association
Stephen Meek
Armenian Bar Association
Davit Zargaryan
Meeting Discussion:
Participants in this meeting had varying familiarity with the districting process. Some have been actively involved throughout the process, while others have only heard about it. National Demographics Corporation (NDC) began the meeting by sharing background information about the process, the outreach being completed throughout and the tentative timeline of the process. NDC also walked through the focus maps.
Participants discussed details of district formation including the number of Councilmember seats, how districts are drawn, changes to Councilmember roles and compensation, redistricting requirements and legal considerations for making the shift.
NDC and the City Attorney provided background information and explained the legal requirements related to these questions.
A member of the Filipino-American Business Association, and resident of northern Glendale, shared that Map 126d represents the northern area of the City well. The representative of Adams Hill Neighborhood Association shared that districts 2 and 3 of Map 106b work well. They also expressed a desire to keep downtown together and shared that the Adams Hill area should not include the canyons because the needs of homeowners in the canyons do not align with those who rent in Adams Hill. The Armenian Bar Association did not share a personal preference or a stance on behalf of their organization.
Participants were encouraged to share their feedback with the City. 587 of 606
Exhibit 3
7 February 15, 12:00 p.m. – Glendale Community College Board of Trustees Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Madeline Wilson
Glendale Community College
Yvette Davis
Meeting Discussion:
The individual participating in this meeting was familiar with the district formation process for both the City of Glendale and the school district.
National Demographics Corporation (NDC) began the meeting by giving a brief overview of district formation while walking through the available resources on the website. NDC also went in-depth on the timeline of the project and what to expect in the coming months.
NDC walked through the focus maps and shared Map 120b as well. The representative of GCC expressed the opinion that Map 126b divides the City most logically, keeping neighborhoods together.
They also expressed a concern that district formation is being explored at the wrong time. They believe district formation should be considered; however, they feel the City is already divided and implementing districts at this time would not help the City manage issues peacefully.
They were invited to share their feedback with the City and encourage their community to do so as well.
588 of 606
Exhibit 3
8 February 26, 6:00 p.m. – Whiting Woods HOA
Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Mike Garcia
Skyler Addison
Whiting Woods HOA
Shirley Owens
Melissa Jones
Jim Fonda
Anne Moser
Steve Moser
Lois Nichols
Kim Arnold
Pete Cooke
Rob Montgomery
Sarah Morrison Hill
Meeting Discussion:
Participants were mostly unfamiliar with the district formation process. The President of the HOA had attended some prior meetings, but all other members were learning about the process for the first time.
National Demographics Corporation (NDC) began the meeting by explaining the history of districting in California and the City’s districting website, including the focus maps and map viewing tools.
Participants discussed details of the process, such as mapping requirements, the general timeline and the financial impact of the process. Upon reviewing the focus maps, a participant expressed interest in Whiting Woods being paired with La Crescenta rather than San Rafael Hills and North Glendale. Another participant shared that Whiting Woods should be paired with Verdugo Hills and the canyon due to similar homeowner and fire concerns. Additional participants expressed a desire to keep school districts together and to follow neighborhoods rather than zip codes when drawing districts. Multiple members shared a general preference for Map 106b.
The organization took no official stance on a map or the process. The HOA President expressed appreciation for being included in a meeting with the City. Members interested in receiving updates about the process provided their emails and were encouraged to stay involved.
589 of 606
Exhibit 3
9 April 8, 7:00 p.m. – Northwest Glendale Homeowners Association Attendees:
Districting Team
Doug Johnson
Mike Garcia
Skyler Addison
NWGHA
Holly Keenan
Allan Durham
Peter Fuad
Carol Brusha
Lawrence Kalfayan
Elise Kalfayan
Meeting Discussion:
Attendees had a variety of understanding of the district formation process.
National Demographics Corporation (NDC) began the meeting by explaining the history of the process and the recent public forum. Throughout the meeting, they walked through the districting website and focus maps.
Participants discussed details of the process such as the reasoning behind considering the shift, legal requirements and the pros and cons of making the change. One resident shared a preference to continue with city-wide elections and expressed a concern that districts would limit the voice of residents.
The organization did not take an official stance on the draft maps or districting process.
Participants were encouraged to stay involved and share personal opinions with the City.
590 of 606
City of Glendale
Districting Stakeholder Meeting Results
May 7, 2024
591 of 606
2 Project Timeline (1 of 2)
Event Description
1st Council Hearing
June 13, 2023 Held prior to release of draft maps.
1st Round Public Forums
June 13 – July 27 1 virtual workshop, 6 in-person workshops + pop-up events. 2nd Council Hearing
July 11
Very similar presentation to the first hearing, but with a summary of feedback from the forums.
3rd Council Hearing
August 15
First formal public and Council consideration of initial draft maps.
2nd Round Public Forums
August 17 – September 7 1 virtual workshop, 6 in-person workshops + pop-up events. 4th Council Meeting
October 10 Second formal public and Council consideration of draft maps.
May 7, 2024
592 of 606
3 Project Timeline (2 of 2)
Event Description
Council Study Session
October 24 Council Study Session to review process and maps 6th Council Meeting
November 7 Additional Council Public Hearing to discuss draft maps Stakeholder Meetings
January 11 – April 8, 2024 Nine stakeholder meetings completed.
Public Forums
April 3 and 18
April 3 at Pacific Community Center & Park
April 18 at Civic Center
Council Consideration
First Hearing May 7 Council consideration of draft maps.
Ballot Measure Deadline
August 9
Council must adopt all resolutions and materials relating to putting the measure on the ballot by this date if it is going on the November 5 ballot
Possible Ballot Item
November 5
If the Council decides to put the measure on the ballot, the vote would be on the November general election ballot.
May 7, 2024
593 of 606
4 Stakeholder Meetings
Date Format Group & Number of Attendees
January 11, 10am Virtual Glendale Latino Association
January 22, 12pm In Person
Glendale Teacher’s Association, Bridging the
Borders,
and Verdugo Woodlands HOA
January 25, 6:30
pm In Person Crescenta Highlands Neighborhood Association February 5, 7pm Virtual Glendale Homeowners Coordinating Council February 8, 6 pm In Person Rossmoyne Neighborhood Assoc.
February 15, 12
pm Virtual Glendale Community College
February 15, 3pm Virtual
Filipino-American Business Association of
Glendale, Adams Hill Neighborhood Association,
and Armenian Bar Association
February 26, 6pm In Person Whiting Woods Neighborhood Assoc.
April 8 In Person Northwest Glendale Neighborhood Assoc.
May 7, 2024
594 of 606
5 Stakeholder Participation
A total of 13 community organizations accepted the invitation to participate.
Stakeholder turnout ranged from 1 (GCC zoom) to about 20 (Crescenta Highlands). Most meetings had between 4 to 16 participants.
A total of 72 community participants gave their names at the stakeholder meetings and last two public forums, and another 29 or so participated without signing in.
May 7, 2024
595 of 606
6 Stakeholder Meeting Format
1. Informal format
2. A presentation was made introducing the issue, describing the process, presenting the timing and walking through the focus maps
“The issue” included both (1) should the question of districts and expanding the Council be put on the ballot; and (2) if put on the ballot, which map should be included? Pro’s and Con’s of by-district election were discussed with reference to the page on the project website
3. Questions were taken throughout the presentation
4. Discussion, ask for stakeholder opinions, and additional questions and answers at the end of the presentation
5. Groups were asked to share their opinion either as an organization or as individuals, both at the meeting and in follow up emails or statements at public forums and council hearings.
May 7, 2024
596 of 606
7 Maps Presented
Council’s three designated focus maps
Maps 120b and 124 also shown based on participant requests Extensive use made of the interactive map to review the maps May 7, 2024
597 of 606
8 General Awareness
1. Most participants had heard something about the issue, but were not participating nor following it.
2. Many questions about whether this would create a ‘strong Mayor’ or full -time Council, and whether this would change the Council – Manager form of government (answer: no).
3. Questions about whether the City is legally compelled to move to districts (answer: no).
4. Many questions about who picks a map, why is the map being drawn now, and if/when the map would be changed.
5. A few questions about the impact on current Councilmembers.
6. Some questions about 2015 vote and the College and School District changing to by-area elections and why the City did not change at the same time.
7. Compliments for city staff’s responsiveness and helpfulness (on all issues, not just districting).
8. Multiple groups expressed their appreciation for the outreach and invitation.
May 7, 2024
598 of 606
9 No formal organization position was taken by
any stakeholder group, but some individuals did
offer their preferences.
Specific Feedback
May 7, 2024
599 of 606
10 Individual Feedback on Districting (1)
1. Concern that creating districts creates “fiefdoms” and isolates Councilmembers from citywide concerns.
2. Dividing the city is not the right answer to the City’s growth. Divisions lead to conflict, not agreement.
3. Districts may make sense some day, but now is not the time.
4. Opposition to this process: districts yes/no should be decided before maps are drawn and outreach conducted.
5. Concern about just having one representative (or two with the Mayor) to contact, instead of all five at-large.
6. Some concern about costs of districting and redistricting.
7. Concern about districts electing someone with only a few hundred votes.
May 7, 2024
600 of 606
11 Individual Feedback on Districting (2)
8. Opposes expanding number of Councilmembers.
9. Running every two years for Mayor would be too expensive, but it is also unfair to only have the Mayor seat up on one election cycle every four years.
10. Supports districts due to neighborhood focus and size of the city – there is no race/ethnic basis to draw districts in Glendale.
11. Support for a rotational Mayor – a district with both the Mayor and a Councilmember would have an advantage.
12. Opposition to districts: residents should vote for all members of council, not just one, to have a say in the City.
13. Concern for opportunity for corruption and/or backroom deal-making.
14. Supports putting the question on the ballot (even though individual is undecided on districts).
May 7, 2024
601 of 606
12 Individual Specific Map Comments (1)
1. Downtown business impacts the entire city – should it be isolated in one district?
2. Crescenta Highlands and Whiting Woods should be in the same district.
3. Whiting Woods is good being with either Verdugo Woodlands or with the Canyons.
4. Montecito Park shares more issues and concerns with the Canyons than with Verdugo Woodlands.
5. In Map 106b, districts 2 and 3 work well but district 5 should not divide downtown.
6. Adams Hill is better with neighboring areas than with Glenoaks Canyon.
7. Adams Hill shares more issues and concerns with the Canyons than with the areas to the immediate north and west.
May 7, 2024
602 of 606
13 Individual Specific Map Comments (2)
8. Preference for map 126b as best for the entire city.
9. Important to avoid dividing neighborhood associations.
10. Verdugo Woodlands could be split – it shares issues and concerns with both Rossmoyne and with neighborhoods to its north.
11. Likes how Map 125 keeps downtown unified, as large-building condo/apartment residents have shared issues and neighborhood concerns.
12. Support for San Fernando Road-focused district such as map 125.
13. Opposition to long San Fernando Road-focused district from Forest Lawn to Burbank.
14. Supports how map 126d creates more diverse districts.
May 7, 2024
603 of 606
14 Specific Map Endorsements
Organizations:
120b and 129*
Adams Hill Neighborhood
Association
120b
Crescenta Highlands
Neighborhood Association
Individuals:
120b
125*
126b
126d*
May 7, 2024
* Map needs some small neighborhood cleanup changes prior to adoption. 604 of 606
15 Other Groups Contacted
The following additional groups were contacted about holding meetings, but either declined or did not respond:
May 7, 2024
Armenian Assembly of
America
Armenian Society of Los
Angeles
Fern Lane HOA Glenoaks Canyon HOA Northwest Glendale Lions Club
Armenian American
Chamber of Commerce
Armenian Union GCC Political Science
Department
Homenetmen Glendale
Ararat Chapter
Pelanconi Estates HOA
Armenian Council of
America
Armenian Youth Association
of California
Glendale Association of
Realtors
Hoover High School Rotary Club of Glendale
Armenian Cultural
Foundation
Chevy Chase Estates
Association
Glendale Bar Association Housing Rights Center Royal Canyon Property Owner's Association
Armenian Educational
Foundation
Clark Magnet High School Glendale Chamber of
Commerce
Kenneth Village Merchants
Association
United Young Armenians
Armenian Engineers &
Scientists of America
College Hills Community
Association
Glendale Environmental
Coalition
Korean Glendale Sister City
Association
Verdugo Woodlands West
HOA
Armenian General
Benevolent Union
Committee for Armenian
Students in Public Schools
Glendale High School League of Women Voters of
Burbank/Glendale
Veterans Coalition of
Glendale & the Verdugos
Armenian National
Committee - Glendale
Crescenta Highlands
Neighborhood Association
Glendale Historical Society Montecito Park
Neighborhood Association
Wellness Works
Armenian National
Committee of America -
Western Region
Crescenta Valley Chamber Glendale Kiwanis Club Montrose Shopping Park Association
Women's Civic League of
Glendale
Armenian Professional
Society
Crescenta Valley High
School
Glendale Sunrise Rotary Montrose Verdugo City
Chamber of Commerce
YMCA Glendale
Armenian Relief Society -
Western Region
Deer Canyon/Oakmont
Property Owners Assoc.
Glendale Tenants Union Montrose-Verdugo-Sparr
Heights Neighborhood
Assoc.
YMCA of the Foothills
Armenian Rights Council of
America
Downtown Glendale
Association
Glen Knoll HOA Neighborhood Legal
Services of LA County
YWCA of Glendale
605 of 606
16 Draft Map Discussion
Interactive Web
Viewer
May 7, 2024
Additional maps available on the interactive map viewer.
Council Focus Maps Additionally Discussed Maps
Specifically Endorsed Maps
606 of 606