MOTION
MovedbyCouncilMemberKassakhian
secondedbyCouncilMemberNajarian,that
theCounciloftheCityatGlendaleherebyaccepts$75,000inbaselinefundingfromLos AngelesCountyAgingandDisabilitiesDepartmentforFY2024-2025SupportiveServices Program(SSP);andauthorizestheCityManageroradesigneetoexecuteAmendment ThreetotheSSP232404SubawardperiodJuly2024—June2025toacceptand implementfunding,asoutlinedintheReporttoCouncildatedJune11,2024.
VoteasFollows:
Ayes:Brotman,Gharpetian,Kassakhian,Najarian,Asatryan
Noes:None
None Absent:
None
Abstain:
THEMOTIONWASADOPTEDATTHEREGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETINGOF:
TUESDAY,JUNE25,2024.
4C1
MOTION
MovedbyCouncilMemberKassakhian,secondedby
CouncilMemberNajarian,thattheCouncilauthorizes the
acceptanceofFY2024-2025OlderAmericansActbaselinefundingof$470,300forthe provisionofElderlyNutritionProgram(ENP)fromCountyofLosAngelesAgingandDisabilities Department(AD)assetforthintheReporttoCouncildatedJune11,2024;andauthorizesthe CityManageroradesigneetoexecuteSubawardtotheCountyofLosAngelesAgingand DisabilitiesDepartmentContractSubawardNumberENP242505period July2024—June2025 toacceptandimplementLosAngelesCountyADfunding.
Brotman,Gharpetian,Kassakhian,Najarian,Asatryan
None
None
None
THEMOTIONWASADOPTEDATTHEREGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETINGOF:
TUESDAY,JUNE25,2024.
4D1
Voteasfollows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
1 Adopted06/25/24Kassakh
ian/Najarian
RESOLUTION
NO.
24-107
All
Ayes
RESOLUTION
OF
THE
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
GLENDALE
MAKING
AN
APPROPRIATION
BE
IT
RESOLVED
BY
THE
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
GLENDALE:
SECTION
1;
That
the
sum
of
$34300
is
hereby
appropnated
and/or
transferred
from
the
following
accounts
to
the
following
accounts:
ACCOUNTS
DESCRIPTION
FROM
TO
31240-2700-CSP-0020-
Federal
Grants,
Nutritional
Meals
Grant
$29,400
P0000-CSPO1
17OAG
Fund,
Community
Services
&
Parks,
Projects,
Congregate
Meals
C-i
4311
0-2700-CSP-0020-
Contractual
Services,
Nutritional
Meals
$29,400
P0000-CSPO11ZOAG
Grant
Fund,
Community
Services
&
Parks,
Projects,
Congregate
Meals
C-i
31 240-2700-CSP-0020-
Federal
Grants,
Nutritional
Meals
Gcant
$4,900
P0000-CSPO1
172AG
Fund,
Community
Services
&
Parks,
Projects,
Home
Delivered
Meals
C-2
431
10-2700-CSP-0020-
Contractual
Services,
Nutritional
Meals
$4,900
P0000-CSPO1I72AG
Grant
Fund,
Community
Services
&
Parks,
Projects,
Home
Delivered
Meals
C-2
The
FY
24-25
budget
is
set
to
be
adopted
on
June
25,
2024.
This
resolution
appropriates
additional
grant
funds
from
Los
Angeles
County
Aging
and
Disabilities
Department
for
FY
2024-2025
Elderly
Nutrition
Program
(ENP)
Cl
and
C2.
SECTION
2:
The
Director
of
Finance
/Information
Technology
is
authorized
to
make
such
other
revisions,
individual
appropriation
line-items,
changes
in
summaries,
fund
totals,
grand
totals,
and
other
portions
of
the
budget
document
as
necessary
to
reflect
and
imptement
the
changes
specified
in
this
resotution.
SECTION
3:
The
City
Clerk
shall
certify
to
the
adoption
of
this
Resolution.
_______
_____________
2024.
I
Mayor
CITY
Of
GLENDALE
)6VL%]
DATE
06/13/2024
APPROVED
AS
TO
FtNANCIAL
\j
PROVISION
FOR
S
34300
.-.‘
,(
.1
___
-
Directbjof
FinanTe
/1fur.1llhIion
Fc.chnology
Adopted
this
25th
day
of
June
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS
CITY OF GLENDALE)
I, Suzie Abajian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-1 07 was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June , 2024, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian Najarian, Asatryan
None
None
None
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
MOTION
MovedbyCouncilMemberKassakhian,secondedbyCouncil
MemberNajarian,thattheCityManager,ordesignee,is
herebyauthorizedtoexecuteacontractwithJB&Associates,LLC,inanamountnotto exceed$122,810forcitywidepedestrianandbicyclecountsrequiredforVisionZero ActionPlandevelopment,asoutlinedintheJune25,2024,staffreportfromtheDirector ofCommunityDevelopment.Saidagreementshall besubjecttoapprovalastoformby theCityAttorney.
Voteasfollows:
Ayes:Brotman,Gharpetian,Kassakhian,Najarian,Asatryan
Noes:None
Absent:None
None Abstain:
THEMOTIONWASADOPTEDATTHEREGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETINGOF:
TUESDAY,JUNE25,2024.
4E1
MOTION
MovedbyCouncilMemberKassakhian,secondedby
CouncilMemberNajarian
,thattheCouncilofthe
CityofGlendaleherebynotesandfilestheSolidWasteCollectionRatesUpdateas outlinedinthe ReporttoCouncildatedJune25,2024.
VoteasFollows:
Ayes.Brotman,Gharpetian,Kassakhian,Najarian,Asatryan
Noes:None
Absent:None
Abstain:None
THEMOTIONWASADOPTEDATTHEREGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETINGOF:
TUESDAY,JUNE25,2024.
4F1
{{section.number}}f
MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____ K_a_s_s_a_k_h_ia_n ____ , seconded by Council Member Najarian , that the City Manager is authorized to execute a professional service agreement with Peraton, Inc., to provide maintenance, support, updates, upgrades and licensing of the computer aided dispatch, Command Point CAD software , in an amount not to exceed $312,000. Beginning FY 2025-26, the Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to process contract amendments with Peraton, Inc. for the life of the software, if the funds for the continued maintenance, support, updates, upgrades and licensing of the software are budgeted within the Verdugo Fire Communications Fund and approved by City Council as part of the annual citywide budget process.
The amendment shall be subject to the review and approval as to form by the City Attorney .
Vote as follows:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
None
None
None
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF:
TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 2024.
Cc_06252024_Mouon_ 4gl Pdf
4G1
MOTION
MovedbyCouncilMemberKassakhian,seconded
byCouncilMemberNajarian
,thattheCityManagerbe,and
herebyisauthorizedtoenterintoaretaineragreementwithLiebertCassidyWhitmore toprovidelegalservicesinconnectionwithadviceandconsultationonemploymentand laborrelationsmatters,litigationbothincourtandPublicEmploymentRelationsBoard, andotherlaborrelatedmatters.TheCityManagerorhisdesigneeisauthorizedto enterintosaidretainerinanamountnottoexceed$150,000foraoneyearperiod.
Voteasfollows:
Ayes:Brotman,Gharpetian,Kassakhian,Najatian,Asatryan
Noes:None
None
Absent:
THEMOTIONWASADOPTEDATTHEREGULARCITYCOUNCILMEETINGOF:
TUESDAY,JUNE25,2024.
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\cC_06252024_Motion_4h1.pdf 4H1
I?t.d:05/21/24,Najarian
Adopted:06/25/24
Najanan/Brotman
Noe:GharpetianORDINANCENO.6026
Abstain:Asatryan
ANORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFGLENDALEAUTHORIZINGTHE
ISSUANCEBYTHECITYOFNOTTOEXCEED$230,000,000
AGGREGATEPRINCIPALAMOUNTOFCITYOFGLENDALEELECTRIC
REVENUEBONDS,2024SECONDSERIES,PAYABLEOUTOFTHE
ELECTRICWORKSREVENUEFUND,ANDAPPROVINGCERTAIN
OTHERACTIONSINCONNECTIONTHEREWITH.
WHEREAS,pursuanttoArticleXXVIoftheCharter(the“Charter”)oftheCityof Glendale,California(the“City”),theCityCounciloftheCity(the“CityCouncil”)is authorizedtoprovidefortheissuanceofrevenuebondsforthepurposeofproviding moneysforthefinancingorrefinancingoftheacquisitionorconstructionofadditionsto, orextensionsorimprovementsof,themunicipalelectricsystemoftheCity(the“Electric System”)byordinanceauthorizingtheissuanceofsuchrevenuebonds;and WHEREAS,pursuanttoArticleXXVIoftheCharter,theCitynowproposesto issueitsElectricRevenueBonds,2024SecondSeries(the“Bonds”)pursuanttoan IndentureofTrust,datedasofFebruary1,2000(the“OriginalIndenture”),byand betweentheCityandTheBankofNewYorkMellonTrustCompany,N.A.,successorto TheBankofNewYorkTrustCompany,N.A.,astrustee(the“Trustee”),as supplementedandamended,includingassupplementedbyanTenthSupplementto IndentureofTrust,datedasofAugust1,2024(the“TenthSupplement”),byand betweentheCityandtheTrustee,toprovidemoneysfor(i)payingalloraportionofthe costs(a)tofurtherdevelopandtoconstructtheGraysonRepoweringProject,consisting ofnaturalgas-poweredelectricgeneratingfacilitiesthatwillreplacecertainportionsof theCity’sexistingGraysonPowerPlant,withatotalcapacityofapproximately56 megawatts(threereciprocatinginternalcombustionenginesratedat18.6megawatts each)anda75megawaw300megawatt-hourbatteryenergystoragesystem,(b)to acquireandconstructtheSchollCanyonLandfillBiogasRenewableGenerationProject, consistingoftheinstallationoffourgasenginegenerators,alongwithalandfillgas cleanupsystem,and/or(C)toacquireandconstructcertainimprovementstotheCity’s electricpublicutility,suchas4to12kvfeederupgrades,solargenerationfacilities installedoncityproperties,substationimprovements,meterupgrades,vaultreplacement andtransmissionanddistributionimprovementsandpolereplacements,ineachcase includingnecessaryandappurtenantfacilitiesandequipmentrelatingthereto,alltobe ownedbytheCity(collectively,the“Projects”),(ii)makingadeposittoadebtservice reservefund,and(iii)payingthecostsofissuanceoftheBonds;and WHEREAS,theBondsshallnotconstituteanindebtednessoftheCitybutshall constituteobligationswhichshallbepayableastobothprincipalandinterestonlyfrom theElectricWorksRevenueFundoftheCity,asprovidedinSection20ofArticleXlof theCharter;provided,however,thatnothingshallprecludethepaymentofdebtservice ontheBondsfromanypremiumoraccruedinterestreceivedfromthesaleoftheBonds asprovidedinSubsection4ofSection4ofArticleXXVIoftheCharter;and WHEREAS,thisOrdinanceisforthepurposeofauthorizingtheissuanceofthe Bonds.
200985081.410012938907a1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Glendale:
Section 1. Authorization to Issue Bonds; Purposes; Principal Amount. (a) Pursuant to Article XXVI of the Charter, the City Council does hereby authorize to be issued, upon the terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth, the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $230,000,000 (or such lesser amount as shall be approved by the City Manager upon consultation with the Director of Finance, the execution of the Bonds constituting conclusive evidence of the City Manager’s approval of such principal amount) for the following objects and purposes: (A) developing, acquiring, constructing and installing the Projects, including any necessary and appurtenance facilities and equipment relating thereto; (B) making a deposit to a debt service reserve fund, if appropriate or necessary; and (C) paying the costs of issuance of the Bonds.
(b) This Ordinance shall constitute complete authority to issue the Bonds pursuant to the Indenture of Trust, as provided herein. The Bonds shall be issued pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Ordinance, and more specifically in the Indenture of Trust.
Section 2. Date of Issuance; Maximum Interest Rate. The Bonds shall be issued on or about August 14, 2024 (or such other date as shall be acceptable to the City Manager upon consultation with the Director of Finance). The maximum interest rate to be payable on any maturity of Bonds shall not exceed six percent (6.0%) pet annum.
Section 3. Maturity Dates. The Bonds shall mature (or be payable by sinking fund redemption) in each of the years 2025 through 2055, inclusive (or in such other years as shall be acceptable to the City Manager upon consultation with the Director of Finance). Subject to the preceding sentence, the Bonds shall mature and be payable on such dates as specifically set forth in the Tenth Supplement.
Section 4. Execution of Bonds. The Mayor and the Director of Finance are each hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds manually or by facsimile signature, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to attest such signatures by manual or facsimile signature. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the seal of the City to the Bonds by manual or facsimile impression thereon.
Section 5. Source of Payment. The Bonds shall not constitute an indebtedness of the City but shall constitute obligations which shall be payable as to both principal and interest only from the Electric Works Revenue Fund of the City, as provided in Section 20 of Article Xl of the Charter; provided, however, that nothing shall preclude the payment of debt service on the Bonds from any premium or accrued interest received from the sale of the Bonds as provided in Subsection 4 of Section 4 of Article XXVI of the Charter.
Section 6. Official Action. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the City with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and the negotiation and execution of the agreements relating thereto are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified. The City Manager, the Director of Finance, the City Treasurer, the City Clerk 2009850$ 1.4
-2-
r—•--
and
any
and
all
other
officers
of
the
City
are
hereby
authorized
and
directed,
for
ahd
in
the
name
and
on
behalf
of
the
City,
to
do
any
and
all
things
and
take
any
and
all
actions,
including,
without
limitation,
the
execution
and
delivery
of
any
and
all
certificates,
requisitions,
agreements,
policies
(including
one
or
more
municipal
bond
insurance
policies
and
one
or
more
debt
service
reserve
account
policies)
and
other
documents,
which
they,
or
any
of
them,
may
deem
necessary
or
advisable
in
connection
with
the
issuance,
sale
and
delivery
of
the
Bonds.
Section
7. Provisions
Necessary
and
Desirable.
The
provisions
of
this
Ordinance
are
deemed
necessary
and
desirable
to
facilitate
the
issuance,
sale
and
delivery
of
the
Bonds
authorized
by
this
Ordinance.
Section
8. Publication.
The
City
Clerk
shall
certify
to
the
passage
and
adoption
of
this
Ordinance
and
shall
cause
this
Ordinance
to
be
published
once
in
the
Glendale
Independent,
a
newspaper
of
general
circulation
published
in
the
City.
Section
9. Effective
Date.
This
Ordinance
shall
take
effect
on
the
thirty-first
(3lSt)
day
after
its
passage.
Passed
by
the
Council
of
the
City
of
Glendale
on
the
25th
day
of
June,
2024.
/
Mayor
)SS
I,
Dr.
Suzie
Abajian,
City
Clerk
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
certify
that
Ordinance
No.
6026
was
passed
by
the
Council
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
California,
at
a
regular
meeting
held
on
the
25th
day
of
June,
2024,
and
that
same
was
passed
by
the
following
vote:Ayes:
Brotman,
Kassakhian,
Najarian
Noes:
Gharpetian
Absent:
NoneAsatryan
Abstain:A
PAOV
ASTO
FORM
IIEFJSt8Th
TC
A
ORNEY
DATE
7i
ATTEST:STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA
)
COUNTY
OF
LOS
ANGELES
CITY
OF
GLENDALE
,dopted
06/25/24
Najarian/Brotman
Noe:GharpetianRESOLUTIONNO.24109
Abstain:Asatryan
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE,
CALIFORNIAAUTHORIZINGTHEINVITATIONOFBIDSFORTHE
PURCHASEOFELECTRICREVENUEBONDS,2024SECONDSERIES
OFTHECITYOFGLENDALE;APPROVINGANOTICEOFINTENTION
TOSELLBONDS,APRELIMINARYOFFICIALSTATEMENT,A
NOTICEINVITINGBIDSANDOFFICIALBIDFORM;AUTHORIZING
THEPUBLICATIONOFANOTICEOFINTENTIONTOSELLBONDS;
AUTHORIZINGTHEEXECUTIONANDDELIVERYOFAFINAL
OFFICIALSTATEMENT,ATENTHSUPPLEMENTTOINDENTUREOF
TRUSTANDACONTINUINGDISCLOSUREAGREEMENT;AND
AUTHORIZINGTHEAWARDOFTHEBONDS
WHEREAS,theCityCounciloftheCityofGlendale,California(the“City Council”)deemsitnecessaryandproperthatbidsbeinvitedforthepurchaseofthe ElectricRevenueBonds,2024SecondSeries(the“Bonds”)oftheCityofGlendale, California(the“City”)andthattheBondsbesoldinthemannerandatthetimeand placeortimesandplaceshereinaftersetforth;
Section1.BidsforthepurchaseoftheBondsshallbereceivedbytheCity Manager,theAssistantCityManager(includingtheAssistantCityManager, ManagementServices),theDirectorofFinance(includingtheDirectorofFinanceand Technology)oftheCityorthedesigneeofanyofthem(eachan“AuthorizedOfficer”)at thetimeandplacedeterminedasprovidedintheNoticeofIntentiontoSellBondsand theNoticeInvitingBidsashereinafterapproved.
Section2.EachAuthorizedOfficerisherebyauthorizedanddirectedto publishaNoticeofIntentiontoSellBonds,priortothedateofreceivingproposalsfor thepurchaseoftheBonds,substantiallyintheformonfilewiththeCityClerk,acopyof whichhasbeenmadeavailabletotheCityCouncil,byoneinsertionintheGlendale Independent,anewspaperofgeneralcirculationpublishedintheCity.
Section3.EachAuthorizedOfficerisfurtherauthorizedanddirectedto publishaNoticeofIntentiontoSellBondsbyoneinsertioninTheBondBuyer,or anotherfinancialpublicationgenerallycirculatedthroughoutCalifornia,priortothedate ofreceivingproposalsforthepurchaseoftheBonds.
Section4.TheCityCouncilherebyapprovesthePreliminaryOfficial StatementsubstantiallyintheformonfilewiththeCityClerk,acopyofwhichhasbeen madeavailabletotheCityCouncil,withsuchchangesthereinasanAuthorizedOfficer maydeterminenecessary,tobefurnishedtoprospectivebiddersfortheBondsas providedinSection5hereof.TheCityauthorizeseachAuthorizedOfficertodeemthe PreliminaryOfficialStatementtobefinalwithinthemeaningofU.S.Securitiesand ExchangeCommissionRule15c2-12,subjecttocompletionofthoseitemspermittedby suchRule.TheCityCouncildirectstheCityClerktofilethePreliminaryOfficial StatementintheCityClerk’sofficeandtoidentifyitasbeingthePreliminaryOfficial Statementsoapprovedhereby.EachAuthorizedOfficerisauthorizedanddirectedto 2011024073
7a2
-
— -
execute and deliver a final Official Statement in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement hereby approved, with such additions thereto and changes therein as are consistent with this Resolution and recommended or approved by Bond Counsel, Disclosure Counsel or counsel to the City and approved by the Authorized Officer executing the final Official Statement, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
Section 5. Each Authorized Officer is authorized and directed to cause to be provided or furnished to prospective bidders, upon their request, the Preliminary Official Statement and a reasonable number of copies of the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, the Indenture of Trust, dated as of February 1, 2000, by and between the City and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor to The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”), as supplemented and amended, including as supplemented by a Tenth Supplement to Indenture of Trust (the “Tenth Supplement”) relating to the Bonds, proposed to be executed and delivered by the City and the Trustee (collectively, the “Indenture of Trust”). Each Authorized Officer is authorized and directed to cause to be furnished to prospective bidders, upon their request, a reasonable number of copies of the Notice Inviting Bids and Official Bid Form substantially in the form on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which has been made available to the City Council. Each Authorized Officer is further authorized and directed, after any proposal for the purchase of the Bonds has been accepted by an Authorized Officer, and after the final Official Statement has been prepared, to cause to be furnished to the successful bidder or bidders, as the case may be, for use in connection with the resale of the Bonds, such number of copies of the final Official Statement as may be reasonably required.
Section 6. Each Authorized Officer may withdraw or modify the Notice Inviting Bids, the Official Bid Form and/or the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds at any time by notice announced through the Parity® electronic bid submission system of Ipreo or other means determined by the Authorized Officer to be reasonably calculated to reach potential bidders for the Bonds. If an Authorized Officer should withdraw the Notice Inviting Bids and the Official Bid Form or the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds at any time before all of the Bonds are awarded, and should at a later date determine that it is desirable to receive bids for all or a portion of the Bonds, then each Authorized Officer is hereby authorized to redistribute the Notice Inviting Bids and the Official Bid Form and republish the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds with such modifications or revisions as are approved by the Authorized Officer.
Section 7. Each Authorized Officer is hereby authorized to award the purchase of the Bonds to the bidder or bidders (which bidder or bidders may bid by electronic means) that provide the highest responsible bid for the Bonds that produces the lowest true interest cost to the City as provided in the Notice Inviting Bids. Each Authorized Officer is hereby further authorized to reject any and all bids as he or she deems appropriate and to waive any irregularity or informality in any bid or bids.
Section 8. To prescribe the terms and conditions upon which the Bonds are to be issued, secured, executed, authenticated and held, the Tenth Supplement proposed to be executed and delivered by the City and the Trustee, in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which has been made available to the City Council, is 201102407.3
-2-
C,
herebyapproved,andtheAuthorizedOfficerisherebyauthorizedanddirected,forand inthenameandonbehalfoftheCity,toexecute,andtheCityClerkisauthorizedto affixtheofficialsealoftheCityto,anddelivertheTenthSupplementtotheTrusteein substantiallysuchform,withsuchchanges(including,withoutlimitation,changes relatingtotheissuanceofamunicipalbondinsurancepolicyand/orasuretybondfor thedebtservicereservefundorsuchchangesasmayberequestedbyanyrating agencyprovidingaratingontheBonds)asmaybeapprovedbytheAuthorizedOfficer executingthesame,actingonbehalfoftheCity,subjecttoadviceofcounsel,such executionthereoftoconstituteconclusiveevidenceoftheapprovaloftheCityofall changesfromtheformoftheTenthSupplementpresentedtothismeeting.
Section9.TheContinuingDisclosureAgreement,proposedtobeexecuted andenteredintobyandbetweentheCityandtheTrustee,insubstantiallytheformon filewiththeCityClerk,acopyofwhichhasbeenmadeavailabletotheCityCouncil,is herebyapproved,andeachAuthorizedOfficerisherebyauthorizedanddirected,for andinthenameandonbehalfoftheCity,toexecuteanddelivertotheTrusteethe ContinuingDisclosureAgreementinsubstantiallysaidform,withsuchchangesasmay beapprovedbytheAuthorizedOfficerexecutingthesame,actingonbehalfoftheCity, subjecttoadviceofcounsel,suchexecutionthereoftoconstituteconclusiveevidenceof theapprovaloftheCityofallchangesfromtheformoftheContinuingDisclosure Agreementpresentedtothismeeting.
Section10.UnlessobtainedbythesuccessfulbidderorbiddersoftheBonds, eachAuthorizedOfficerisherebyauthorizedtoobtainmunicipalbondinsuranceforall oranyportionoftheBonds,providedthatthepremiumforsuchinsurancedoesnot exceed2.0%ofthepaymentsinsured.EachAuthorizedOfficerisherebyauthorized anddirectedtoexecuteanddeliveranycommitment,guaranty,subrogationagreement orothersimilaragreementinconnectionwithsuchinsuranceasshallbeapprovedby theAuthorizedOfficerexecutingthesame(suchapprovaltobeconclusivelyevidenced byhisorherexecutionanddeliverythereof).
Section11.EachAuthorizedOfficerandtheCityTreasurerandanyother officeroftheCityisherebyauthorizedto(i)takeanyandallactionswhichsuchperson deemsnecessaryoradvisableinordertoeffecttheregistrationorqualification(or exemptiontherefrom)oftheBondsforissue,offer,saleortradeunderthe“BlueSky”or securitieslawsofanyofthestatesoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaandinconnection therewithtoexecute,acknowledge,verify,deliver,fileorcausetobepublishedany applications,reports,andotherpapersandinstrumentswhichmayberequiredunder suchlaws,andtotakeanyandallfurtheractionswhichsuchpersonmaydeem necessaryoradvisableinordertomaintainanysuchregistrationorqualificationand (ii)executeanddeliveranyandallagreements(including,butnotlimitedto,investment agreementsorguaranteedinvestmentagreements),ataxcertificate,documentsand instrumentsandtodoandcausetobedoneanyandallactsandthingsdeemed necessaryoradvisableforcarryingoutthetransactionscontemplatedbythis Resolution.Suchactionsheretoforetakenbysuchofficers,ortheirdesignees,are herebyratified,confirmedandapproved.
2011024073
-3-
Section 12. In accordance with California Government Code Section 5852.1, good faith estimates of the following are set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto: (a) the true interest cost of the Bonds, (b) the sum of all fees and charges paid to third parties with respect to the Bonds, (c) the amount of proceeds of the Bonds expected to be received net of the fees and charges paid to third parties and any reserves or capitalized interest paid or funded with proceeds of the Bonds, and (d) the sum total of all debt service payments on the Bonds calculated to the final maturity thereof plus the fees and charges paid to third parties not paid with the proceeds of the Bonds.
Section 13. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. 201102407.3
-4-
EXHIBIT
A
GOOD
FAITH
ESTIMATES
The
following
information
was
obtained
from
the
Municipal
Advisor
with
respect
to
the
Bonds
approved
in
the
Resolution,
and
is
provided
in
compliance
with
California
Government
Code
Section
5852.1:
1. True
Interest
Cost
of
the
Bonds.
Assuming
an
aggregate
principal
amount
of
$168,765,000
of
the
Bonds
are
sold
and
based
on
market
interest
rates
prevailing
at
the
time
of
preparation
of
this
information,
agood
faith
estimate
of
the
true
interest
cost
of
the
Bonds,
which
means
the
rate
necessary
to
discount
the
amounts
payabte
on
the
respective
principal
and
interest
payment
dates
to
the
purchase
price
received
for
the
Bonds,
is
4.307437%.
2. Finance
Charge
of
the
Bonds.
Assuming
an
aggregate
principal
amount
of
$168,765,000
of
the
Bonds
are
sold
and
based
on
market
interest
rates
prevailing
at
the
time
of
preparation
of
this
information,
a
good
faith
estimate
of
the
finance
charge
of
the
Bonds,
which
means
the
sum
of
all
fees
and
charges
paid
to
third
parties
(or
costs
associated
with
the
Bonds),
is
$765,000.
3. Amount
of
Proceeds
to
be
Received.
Assuming
an
aggregate
principal
amount
of
$168,765,000
of
the
Bonds
are
sold
and
based
on
market
interest
rates
prevailing
at
the
time
of
preparation
of
this
information,
agood
faith
estimate
of
the
amount
of
proceeds
expected
to
be
received
by
the
City
for
sale
of
the
Bonds
less
the
finance
charge
of
the
Bonds
described
in
2 above
and
any
reserves
or
capitalized
interest
paid
or
funded
with
proceeds
of
the
Bonds,
is
$168,000,000.
4. Total
Payment
Amount.
Assuming
an
aggregate
principal
amount
of
$168,765,000
of
the
Bonds
are
sold
and
based
on
market
interest
rates
prevailing
at
the
time
of
preparation
of
this
information,
agood
faith
estimate
of
the
total
payment
amount,
which
means
the
sum
total
of
all
payments
the
City
will
make
to
pay
debt
service
on
the
Bonds
plus
the
finance
charge
of
the
Bonds
described
in
paragraph
2 above
not
paid
with
the
proceeds
of
the
Bonds,
calculated
to
the
final
maturity
of
the
Bonds,
is
$326,034,410.42.
Attention
is
directed
to
the
fact
that
the
foregoing
information
constitutes
good
faith
estimates
only.
The
actual
interest
cost,
finance
charges,
amount
of
proceeds
and
total
payment
amount
may
vary
from
the
estimates
above
due
to
variations
from
these
estimates
in
the
timing
of
Bond
sales,
the
amount
of
Bonds
sold,
the
amortization
of
the
Bonds
sold
and
market
interest
rates
at
the
time
of
each
sale.
The
date
of
sale
and
the
amount
of
Bonds
sold
will
be
determined
by
the
City
based
on
market
and
other
factors.
The
actual
interest
rates
at
which
the
Bonds
will
be
sold
will
depend
on
the
Bond
market
at
the
time
of
sale.
The
actual
amortization
of
the
Bonds
will
also
depend,
in
part,
on
market
interest
rates
at
the
time
of
sale.
Market
interest
rates
are
affected
by
economic
and
other
factors
beyond
the
City’s
control.
2011024073
-5-
Adopted
by
the
Council
of
the
City
of
Glendale
on
this
25th
day
of
June,
2024.
ATTEST:
4,
lerk
yor
PPROVED
AS
TO
RM
HI
FASSIS
A
TYA
OR
Y
DATE_____
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA
)
COUNTY
OF
LOS
ANGELES
)ss
CITY
OF
GLENDALE
)
I,
DR.
SUZIE
ABAJIAN,
City
Clerk
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
California,
do
hereby
certify
that
Resolution
No.
24-
109
was
adopted
by
the
Council
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
California
at
a
regular
meeting
held
on
the
25th
day
of
June,
2024,
and
that
same
was
adopted
by
the
following
vote:
Ayes:
Brotman,
Kassakhian,
Najarian
Noes:
Gharpetian
Absent:
None
Abstain:
Asatryan
201102407.3
-6-
Adopted
06/25/24
Brotman/Gharpetian
AllAyesRESOLUTIONNO.24-112
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA,DISPENSINGWITHCOMPETITIVEBIDDINGAND
APPROVINGANAGREEMENTWITHWILSYSCOMMUNICATIONS
WHEREAS,theCityofGlendalerequiresreliablelowvoltagecabling infrastructuretosupportitsoperations,includingdatanetworking,telecommunications, andsecuritysystems;andWilsysCommunicationshasbeentheCity’slowvoltage cablingprovidersinceOctoberof2011,demonstratingconsistentperformanceand expertise;
WHEREAS,overthisperiod,Wilsyshassuccessfullycompletedseveralprojects onbehalfoftheCityandhasparticipatedinandwontheCity’scompetitivebidding processonmultiplepastoccasionsincludinga3-yearcontractawardedin2019forcity widemaintenanceandrepairofsecuritysystems;
WHEREAS,inFebruary2023,thePurchasingSectionconductedacompetitive bidprocessforVoiceandDataCablinginaccordancewithGlendaleMunicipalCode Section4.12.070andWilsysCommunicationswasthelowestbidderandwasawarded Contract8001996;however,Section4.12.070oftheGlendaleMunicipalCodeislimited tocontractsupto$50,000;
WHEREAS,theCitytypicallyadherestoacompetitivebiddingprocesstoensure fairmarketvalue,therearecircumstanceswheredispensingwiththeprocessmaybe justified;suchasinthecaseofWilsys,thefollowingfactorssupportanon-competitive award:
•WirelessExpansionSupport:Wilsyswillprovideimplementationsupportfor Phase2oftheCitywideWirelessExpansionProject.Theirexistingknowledgeof theCity’sinfrastructurewillbecrucialforthesuccessofthisproject. 1C:inetpubwwwrootrnultitenanttemp’CC_06252024_Resolution8aIpdf 81 • Proven Performance: Wilsys has a long-standing track record of providing excellent service to the City. Their work consistently meets or exceeds expectations in terms of quality, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness. • Specialized Knowledge: Wilsys possesses in-depth knowledge of the City’s cabling infrastructure, networks, and specific requirements thereof. This familiarity minimizes disruptions and ensures efficient project execution. • Unique Experience: Wilsys has unique experience working at the City’s facilities over a significant period. This experience has allowed Wilsys to be more efficient in identifying problem areas, reducing both time and effort needed for implementation, troubleshooting and repairs.
• Competitive Pricing: Past bidding processes demonstrate Wilsys’ ability to provide competitive pricing that aligns with the City’s budgetary constraints. • Continuity of Service: Maintaining Wilsys as the provider ensures seamless operations and minimizes potential service disruptions associated with transitioning to a new vendor.
WHEREAS, by extending the contract with the existing incumbent vendor, the city will maintain immediate access to the needed services while retaining current terms and conditions;
WHEREAS, to fully realize the benefits of the city’s wireless expansion initiative, staff needs authorization to complete Phase 2 of the project, which directly addresses a primary directive from the City Council to identity densely populated neighborhoods with limited or no access to high-speed broadband services due to economic reasons and the Phase 2 sites are within or adjacent to these Top 20 census tracts, prioritizing areas with the greatest need. Connectivity at these sites will initially be achieved through 2 C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\ternp\CC06252024_Resolution_8a1 .pdf commerciallyprovidedcarriersofcellularand/orbroadbanddataservicesandatotalof seventeenaccesspointswillbeimplementedinaccordancewiththecouncilreport.
WHEREAS,thisexpansionisessentialtobridgethedigitaldivide,provide equitableaccesstoessentialservices,andfostereconomicgrowthinunderserved communities;
WHEREAS,GlendaleCharterArt.VI,Sec.9providesanexemptionto competitivebiddingforanycontractwhenitdeterminesthatitisinthebestinterestsof thecitysotodo.
NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
GLENDALE:
1.Thattheforegoingfactsaredeemedtobetrueandcorrectandabasisfor dispensingwithcompetitivebiddingandauthorizingtheexecutionofanagreementwith asinglesource.
2.ThatpursuanttoGlendaleCharterArt.VI,Sec.9providesthatcompetitive biddingshallnotberequiredforanycontractwhenitdeterminesthatitisinthebest interestsofthecitysotodo.
3.That,thePurchasingAdministratorisherebyauthorizedtoexecutean agreementwithWilsysCommunicationsfortheprovisionoflowvoltagecablingservices assetforthinthecouncilreport.
4.Thecontractamendmentforthelowvoltagecablingservicescontractis estimatedtocost$749,000forthreeyears;Fundinghasalreadybeenappropriated duringFY2023-24andFY2024-25;therefore,noadditionalappropriationisneededat thistime.
3C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\CC_06252024.Resolution_8aI.pdf Adopted this 25th day of June
, 2024.
tMafor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
) SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Dr. Suzie Abajian, Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-112 was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June , 2024, and that same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, AsatryanNoes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Clerk
APOVEDASTM
IT NEY
DATE 7t-h-Y
4 C:\inetpub\tvwwroot\multitenant\temp\CC_06252024_Resolution_8a1 .pdf .—
Adopted
06/25/24
Gharpetian/Najarian
Abstain:Brotman(recused)
RESOLUTIONNO.24-113
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOF THECITYOFGLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA,DISPENSINGWITHCOMPETITIVEBIDDINGAND
APPROVINGANAGREEMENTWITHWILSYSCOMMUNICATIONS
WHEREAS,theCityofGlendalecurrentlyemploysadiverse rangeof technologiesandsolutionsfromvariousmanufacturerstoprovideessentialmunicipal services,andwhilethisapproachhaseffectivelymetoperationalneeds,anopportunity existsforfurtheroptimizationandefficiencygainsthroughstrategicstandardization.
WHEREAS,byadoptingaunifiedinfrastructurebasedonofferingsfromCisco Systems,Microsoft,andPaloAltoNetworks,thecitycanaddresstheinherent complexitiesofmanagingamulti-vendorenvironmentandstandardizingtheIT ecosystemwillenabletheconsolidationofdisparatecomponents,includingoperating systems,virtualizationplatforms, andstoragesolutions,makingiteasiertooverseeand managetheentire infrastructure;
WHEREAS,thisconsolidationwillleadtostreamlinedprocurementprocesses, simplifiedlicensingagreements,andreducedmaintenancecostsandpreliminary estimatessuggestthattheseefficienciescouldresultinannualIToperatingcost savingsofupto15%.Additionally,integratedsystemsandstandardizedprocesseswill accelerateservicedelivery,minimizedowntime,andenhancestaffproductivity, potentiallyboostingITstaffefficiencyby10%,consistentwithindustrybenchmarks demonstratingthepositiveimpactofstandardizationonproductivity; WHEREAS,aunifiedinfrastructurewillalsofosterimprovedcompatibilityacross systems,reduceserviceinterruptions, andsimplifytroubleshooting,ultimatelycreatinga morereliableandresilientITenvironmentandbyadoptingthefullsuiteofPaloAlto Networkssolutions,thecitycanimplementconsistentsecuritypolicies,centralized 1C:\inetpub\wwwrootmuhitenanttemp\CC_O6252O24ResoIution8bI.pdf8b1
patch management, and a reduced attack surface, thereby bolstering its cybersecurity posture and mitigating the risk of breaches and data loss.
WHEREAS, for networking needs, Cisco Systems provides essential equipment like switches, routers, and wireless access points. The department also uses Cisco for virtual servers, optical multiplexing, and important security features like network access control.
WHEREAS, for advanced security solutions, the city relies on Palo Alto Networks. Their products include next-generation firewalls, secure access services, and Al-driven security operations platforms that help protect the city’s systems from cyber threats.
WHEREAS, the City also relies heavily on Microsoft products and services for various productivity and collaboration needs, including personal computers, operating systems, cloud-based services, server applications, and software development tools.
The City currently has several existing agreements with Microsoft vendors for software licensing, including for Microsoft Academic licensing, and Microsoft Enterprise software licensing. In particular, the agreement with California Department of Technology has resulted in significant cost savings for the city, reducing annual expenses by 68% over three years. Azure cloud services and support will be purchased directly from Microsoft.
WHEREAS, over the past five years, the city has conducted numerous competitive bids for Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft products and services, and in these cases, few vendors have consistently won most of these contracts demonstrating a strong understanding of the city’s specific needs and have provided reliable service and support. This approach will streamline the procurement process, ensure consistent quality and service, leverage established relationships with proven 2 C: inetpub\.wwwroot\multitenantternp’CC_06252024_Resolution_$bI.pdf vendors,andmaintainthesignificantcostsavingsachievedthroughthecurrent MicrosoftEnterpriselicensingagreement;
WHEREAS,theCityofGlendalePurchasingPolicypromotesthestandardization ofcommonlyuseditems,equipment,hardware,parts,software,etc.,andthisprocess willeliminaterepetitivefutureapprovalsbytheCityCouncilforsimilarequipment,and standardizeditemsneedtobereviewedbytheDepartmentatleasteveryfiveyearsand needtobeapprovedbyCityCouncilatleasteverytenyears;
WHEREAS,GlendaleCharterArt.VI,Sec.9providesanexemptionto competitivebiddingforanycontractwhenitdeterminesthatitisinthebestinterestsof thecitysotodo.
NOWTHEREFOREBEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
GLENDALE:
1.ThattheCityCouncilherebyapprovesthestandardizationoftheIT ecosystemrelatingtosoftware,hardware,parts,maintenance,andservicesfromCisco Systems,Microsoft,andPaloAltoNetworks,withtheunderstandingthatreasonable effortwillbemadeinthepurchaseofsuchequipmenttoobtaincompetitivepricing.
2.ThatthedeterminationtostandardizeCiscoSystems,Microsoft,andPalo AltoNetworkswillbereviewedbytheITDepartmentandthePurchasingSectionat leasteveryfiveyearsandtheITDepartmentwillseekapprovalfromCityCouncilat leasteverytenyears.
3.Thattheforegoingfactsaredeemedtobetrueandcorrectandabasisfor dispensingwithcompetitivebiddingandtheCouncilherebyfindsthatitisinthebest interestsoftheCitytodispensewithcompetitivebidding.
3C:\inetpub’wwwroot\multitenant\temp\CCO6252O24ResoIunon8blpdf 4 4. The City Manager or the Purchasing Administrator are hereby authorized to execute agreements or issue purchase orders (as required by the City’s Purchasing Policy) with Cisco Systems, Microsoft, and Palo Alto Networks for purchase of software, hardware, parts, maintenance, and services as needed, as long as the budget is available.
Adopted this 25th day of June
, 2024.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Dr. Suzie Abajian, Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 241 13 was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June
, 2024, and that same was
adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, AsatryanNoes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: Brotman (recused)
City Clerk
PAOV bASTO M
Ct-Il ASSIST TV ATTO
DATE / /—/ ‘.A/ 4 C:\inetpub\wwwroot\multitenant\temp\CC_06252024_Resolution_8b I .pdf Adopted06/25/24Kassakhian/NajarianAll
Ayes
RESOLUTION
NO.
24-114
A
RESOLUTION
OF
THE
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING
A
GENERAL
BUDGET,
ENTERPRISE
BUDGETS,
AND
OTHER
MISCELLANEOUS
BUDGETS
FOR
THE
FISCAL
YEAR
2024-25
BE
IT
RESOLVED
BY
THE
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
GLENDALE:
SECTION
1:
The
proposed
City
Budget
is
hereby
approved
and
adopted
as
the
Budget
of
the
City,
for
fiscal
year
2024-25.
SECTION
2:
The
amount
of
$325,659,744
shall
constitute
the
General
Fund
appropriation
for
fiscal
year
beginning
July
1,
2024,
SECTION
3:
The
amount
of
$152,241
,51
1shall
constitute
the
Special
Revenue
Funds
appropriation
for
the
fiscal
year
beginning
July
1,
2024.
SECTION
4:
The
amount
of
$2,995,000
shall
constitute
the
Debt
Service
Funds
appropriation
for
the
fiscal
year
beginning
July
1,
2024.
SECTION
5:
The
amount
of
$33,282,433
shall
constitute
the
Capital
Improvement
Funds
appropriation
for
the
fiscal
year
beginning
July
1,
2024.
SECTION
6:
The
amount
of
$544,158,982
shall
constitute
the
Enterprise
Funds
appropriation
for
the
tiscal
year
beginning
July
1,
2024.
SECTION
7:
The
amount
of
$146,048,354
shall
constitute
the
Internal
Service
Funds
appropriation
for
the
fiscal
year
beginning
July
1,
2024.
SECTION
8:
The
number
of
authorized
classified
and
unclassified
budgeted
salaried
positions
is
7,620.
SECTION
9:
The
Director
of
Finance
and
Information
Technology
is
authorized
to
make
such
other
revisions,
individual
appropriation
line-items,
changes
in
summaries,
fund
totals,
grand
totals,
and
other
portions
of
the
budget
document
as
necessary
to
reflect
and
implement
the
changes
specified
in
this
resolution.
8c1
RESOLUTION NO. 24-114
SECTION 10: The Director of Finance and lnformat,on Technology is authorized to make such revisions, as permitted by the Charter, necessary in order to implement changes in expenditures due to final negotiations of City of Glendale employee associations Memorandums of Understanding.
SECTION 11: The City Manager or his/her designee is authorized by the City Council to assign fund balance in the “Assigned” category, which is comprised of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but are not restricted or committed. The financial policies of the City will also be updated to reflect this delegation or authority.
SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS
CITY OF GLENDALE)
I, Suzie Abajian, PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-114 was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June, 2024, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
None
None
None
Adopted this 25th day of June, 2024.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF GLENDALE
DATE 5/29/2024
APPROVED AS TO fiNANCIAL
PROVISION FOR $ 7,204,386,024
Director Technology
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
City Clerk
AS TO roM
DATE
7?
Adopted
06/25/24
Kassakhian/Najarian
Noe: Asatryan RESOLUTION NO. 24-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE
ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES, AND INCREASING, DECREASING, MODIFYING
CERTAIN EXISTING FEES FOR VARIOUS SERVICES, PERMITS, AND
CERTIFICATES PROVIDED BY THE CITY, AND AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Glendale has determined that in order to continue providing effective services for the public welfare, the City must establish and increase, decrease, modify, or delete fees for certain municipal services in order to accurately reflect the City's true cost in providing such services; and WHEREAS, the Council has also determined that (1) by consolidating fees, rates, charges, penalties, fines (collectively, "fees"), and tables and schedules-which have been previously adopted-into a comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule, the consolidation will centralize fees, tables, and schedules in a single document which can be published on the City's website and considered each year as part of the budgetary process; and that (2) this Citywide Fee Schedule consolidates most existing fees, tables, and schedules into a single document; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to enact some new fees, and increase, decrease, modify, remove, or leave unchanged existing fees- for certain services and programs provided by the City and to include the new, increased, decreased, modified or unchanged fees, and the tables and schedules, in a comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule, as outlined in the FY 2024-25 Budget Adoption Staff Report, dated June 25, 2024, and as contained in the FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment #1 to this resolution), incorporated into this Resolution by this reference.
WHEREAS, the FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1) contains:
1. Newly created fees with an effective date of July 25, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
2. Increasing fees with an effective date of July 25, 2024 and September 1, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
3. Decreasing fees with an effective date of July 25, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
4. Modified fees with an effective date of July 25, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution) 1 8c2
5. Fees which are a charge imposed for any one or more of the following purposes:
A. A specific City benefit conferred or privilege granted (California Constitution, Article XIII C, §1 (e)(1));
B. A City service or product (California Constitution, Article XIII C, §1 (e)(2)); C. A charge imposed for City’s issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, and administrative enforcement and adjudication (California Constitution, Article XIII C, § 1 (e)(3)); or D. A monetary charge imposed by the City as a result of a violation of law (California Constitution, Article Xlii C, § 1 (e)(5)); and WHEREAS, the departments have reviewed the fees charged for such services, and with the approval of the City Manager, recommend the adoption of certain fees.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
SECTION 1. Notice of the public meeting and public hearing at which this Resolution was considered was properly given, and all oral and written presentations made to and heard by the City Council were properly considered.
SECTION 2. The cost estimates produced by City staff and considered by the City Council in establishing fees under this Resolution are reasonable cost estimates for the provision of the City services to which the fees pertain and were made available to the public.
SECTION 3. There is a reasonable relationship between the fees to be collected for the provision of various City services and the City’s costs in providing those services, as identified in the data made available.
SECTION 4. The fees— which are newly created, increased, decreased, and modified — as set forth in the FY 2024-25 Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1):
1. Do not exceed the actual or estimated reasonable costs to the City of providing the services to which the fees relate;
2. Are reasonable and necessary to enable the City to provide the benefit or privilege, service or product, license or permit, use or rental, fine or penalty, or property development to which they relate;
3. Have been allocated in a manner such that the costs to a payor bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payor’s burden on, or benefits received, from the City; and
4. Are the official fees of the City of Glendale for the public services and violations referenced in that document.
2 SECTION
5. Any
fee
listed
or
described
in
the
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1)
as
an
“in
lieu”
fee
that
apayor
chooses
to
pay,
is
paid
in
place
of
aGlendale
Municipal
Code
obligation
imposed
by
the
City.
SECTION
6. The
Council
hereby
approves
and
adopts:
1. The
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1),
which:
A.
Consolidates
existing
fees,
tables,
and
schedules;
and
B.
Creates,
increases,
decreases,
modifies
or
removes
some
fees;
and
2. A
rate,
fee,
or
charge
established
in
FY
2023-24
by
aduly
adopted
resolution
of
the
Parks,
Recreation
and
Community
Services
Commission
under
the
Commission’s
authority
granted
in
Glendale
Municipal
Code
Section
2.60.140,
and
that
rate,
fee,
or
charge
is
hereby
incorporated
into
the
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1).
SECTION
7. Any
fee,
rate,
charge,
penalty,
fine,
table,
or
schedule
contained
in
the
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1),
as
adopted
in
this
Resolution,
will
prevail
and
apply
in
the
event
of
a
conflict
with
any
other
fee,
rate,
charge,
penalty,
fine,
table,
or
schedule.
SECTION
8. The
Council
authorizes
an
annual
increase
of
the
fees
imposed
by
this
Resolution
as
of
July
1st
of
each
year,
in
an
amount
equal
to
the
increase
from
the
base
index
in
the
then
latest
available
Consumer
Price
Index
(CPI),
as
prepared
and
released
by
the
U.S.
Department
of
Labor,
Bureau
of
Statistics,
without
separate
action
by
the
City
Council.
BE
IT
FURTHER
RESOLVED
that
newly
created
fees,
increased
fees,
decreased
fees,
and
modified
fees
set
forth
in
the
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1)
and
identified
therein
with
an
effective
date
of
July
25,
2024
shall
become
effective
on
the
thirtieth
(3Qth)
day
following
adoption
of
this
Resolution
and
those
increased
fees
identified
in
the
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1)
with
an
effective
date
of
September
1,
2024
shall
become
effective
on
the
68th
day
following
adoption
of
this
Resolution.
Fees
in
the
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
that
are
unchanged
by
this
Resolution
shall
remain
in
effect
and
fees
deleted
from
the
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
by
this
Resolution
shall
no
longer
be
in
effect
as
of
July
1,
2024.
Adopted
this
25th
day
of
June,
2024.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City
Clerk
3 ..
Adopted
06/25/24
Kassakh ia n/N aja ria n
All Ayes RESOLUTION NO. 24-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE
ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES, AND INCREASING, DECREASING, MODIFYING
CERTAIN EXISTING FEES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE CITYWIDE FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FOR PUBLIC WORKS, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, AND FIRE RELATED SERVICES, PERMITS, AND CERTIFICATES WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Glendale has determined that in order to continue providing effective services for the public welfare, the City must establish and increase, decrease, modify, or delete fees for certain municipal services which accurately reflect the City's true cost in providing such services; and WHEREAS, the Council has also determined that (1) by consolidating fees, rates, charges, penalties, fines (collectively, "fees"), and tables and schedules- which have been previously adopted- into a comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule, the consolidation will centralize fees, tables, and schedules in a single document which can be published on the City's website and considered each year as part of the budgetary process; and that (2) this Citywide Fee Schedule consolidates most existing fees, tables, and schedules into a single document; and
WHEREAS, Title 12 of the Glendale Municipal Code provides that certain fees for services provided by the Public Works Department must be established or modified by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Title 30 of the Glendale Municipal Code provides that fees for services provided by the Community Development Department relating to Zoning Ordinance procedures must be specified by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Titles 2, 15, and 16 of the Glendale Municipal Code also provide for services furnished by the Community Development Department for which fees are required but not otherwise specified; and
WHEREAS, the Glendale Building and Safety Code provides that fees for permits and certificates must be established or modified by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Ordinance Nos. 4749, 5135, 5221 of the Glendale Municipal Code and Resolution No. 08-130 provide that fees for permits, plan checks, field inspections, hazardous waste management, and hazardous waste treatment provided by the Fire Department must be established or modified by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to enact some new fees, and increase, decrease, modify, remove, or leave unchanged existing fees- for certain services and programs provided by the City and to include the new, increased, decreased modified or unchanged fees, and the tables and schedules, in a comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule, as outlined in the FY 2024-25 Budget Adoption Staff Report, dated June 25, 2024, and as contained in the FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment #1 to this resolution), incorporated into this Resolution by this reference; and 1 8c3
WHEREAS, the Council has directed that the proposed fee to appeal a decision to the Planning Commission or to the City Council, and the proposed fee to appeal an Administrative Use Permit or Administrative Design Review decision, as set forth in Chapter V - Community Development, Section 2: Planning Fees as item Nos. 6 and 7, respectively, on page 80 of 205 of the FY 2024-2025 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule attached hereto as Attachment 1, not be changed, and shall remain $2000 for appeals to Planning Commission or to City Council, and shall remain $520 for appeals of Administrative Use Permits or Administrative Design review; and WHEREAS, the FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1) contains:
1. Newly created fees with an effective date of August 24, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
2. Increasing fees with an effective date of August 24, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
3. Decreasing fees with an effective date of August 24, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
4. Modified fees with an effective date of August 24, 2024 as identified in FY 2024-25 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule (Attachment 1 to this resolution)
5. Fees which ate a charge imposed for any one or more of the following urposes:
A. A specific City benefit conferred or privilege granted (California Constitution, Article XIII C, §1 (e)(1));
B. A City service or product (California Constitution, Article XIII C, §1 (e)(2)); C. A charge imposed for City’s issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, and administrative enforcement and adjudication (California Constitution, Article XIII C, § 1 (e)(3)); or D. A monetary charge imposed by the City as a result of a violation of law (California Constitution, Article XIII C, § 1 (e)(5)); and WHEREAS, the departments have reviewed the fees charged for such services, and with the approval of the City Manager, recommend the adoption of certain fees.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:
2 SECTION
1. Notice
of
the
public
meeting
and
public
hearing
at
which
this
Resolution
was
considered
was
properly
given,
and
all
oral
and
written
presentations
made
to
and
heard
by
the
City
Council
were
properly
considered
under
California
Government
Code
Sections
66016
and
66018.
SECTION
2. The
cost
estimates
produced
by
City
staff
and
considered
by
the
City
Council
in
establishing
fees
under
this
Resolution
are
reasonable
cost
estimates
for
the
provision
of
the
City
services
to
which
the
fees
pertain
and
were
made
available
to
the
public
under
Government
Code
Section
66016.
SECTION
3. There
is
a
reasonable
relationship
between
the
fees
to
be
collected
for
the
provision
of
various
City
services
and
the
City’s
costs
in
providing
those
services,
as
identified
in
the
data
made
available.
SECTION
4. The
fees,
which
are
newly
created,
increased,
decreased,
and
modified—
as
set
forth
in
the
FY
2024-25
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1):
1. Do
not
exceed
the
actual
or
estimated
reasonable
costs
to
the
City
of
providing
the
services
to
which
the
fees
relate;
2. Are
reasonable
and
necessary
to
enable
the
City
to
provide
the
benefit
or
privilege,
service
or
product,
license
or
permit,
use
or
rental,
fine
or
penalty,
or
property
development
to
which
they
relate;
3. Have
been
allocated
in
a
manner
such
that
the
costs
to
a
payor
bear
a
fair
and
reasonable
relationship
to
the
payor’s
burden
on,
or
benefits
received,
from
the
City;
and
4. Are
the
official
fees
of
the
City
of
Glendale
for
the
public
services
and
violations
referenced
in
that
document.
SECTION
5. Any
fee
listed
or
described
in
the
FY
2024-25
Proposed
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1)
as
an
“in
lieu”
fee
that
a
payor
chooses
to
pay
instead
of
an
obligation
imposed
by
the
Glendale
Municipal
Code
is
paid
in
place
of
that
obligation
imposed
by
the
City.
SECTION
6. The
City
Council
hereby:
1. Approves
and
adopts
the
Public
Works,
Community
Development,
and
Fire
related
fees
which
are,
created,
increased,
decreased,
modified
or
deleted
as
set
forth
in
the
FY
2024-25
Proposed
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1);
and
2. Authorizes
staff
to
consolidate
these
fees,
tables,
and
schedules
with
the
FY
2024-25
Proposed
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
after
itbecomes
effective.
SECTION
7. Any
fee,
rate,
charge,
penalty,
fine,
table,
or
schedule
contained
in
the
FY
2024-25
Proposed
Citywide
Fee
Schedule
(Attachment
1),
as
amended
in
this
Resolution,
will
prevail
and
apply
in
the
event
of
a
conflict
with
any
other
fee,
rate,
charge,
penalty,
fine,
table,
or
schedule.
3 RESOLUTIONNO.
__________
RESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOF GLENDALE
MAKINGANAPPROPRIATION
BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE:
SECTION1:Thatthesumof$10,000,000isherebyappropriatedand/ortransferredfromthefollowing accountstothefollowingaccounts:
ACCOUNTSDESCRIPTIONFROMTO
25300-1010-000-0000-P0000-UndesignatedFundBalance,General$10,000,000 T0000-F0000-0000-0000-Fund
51200-4010-CSP-0020-P0000-OtherImprovements,Capital$10,000,000 T0000-F0000-0000-0000-ImprovementFundCommunfty
PWDO1169ANServices&Parks,CentralPark
TotransferfundsfromtheGeneralFundtotheCapitalImprovementFundforthefundingoftheCentral ParkRenovationproject.
SECTION2:TheDirectorofFinance/InformationTechnologyisauthorizedtomakesuchotherrevisions, individualappropriationline-items,changesinsummaries,fundtotals,grandtotals,andotherportionsof thebudgetdocumentasnecessarytoreflectandimplementthechangesspecifiedinthisresolution.
SECTION3:TheCityClerkshallcertifytotheadoptionofthisResolution.
Adoptedthisdayof
________________,
2024.
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITYOFGLENDALE
‘•,DATE5/30/2024
___________________________
APPROVEDASTOFINANCIAL
CityClerkPROVISIONFOR$10,000,000
Directori{L/inance//nforma7onTechnology
STATEOFCALIFORNIA)
COUNTYOFLOSANGELES)SS
CITYOFGLENDALE)
I,SuzieAbajian,Ph.D.,CityClerkoftheCityofGlendale,doherebycertifythatthe foregoingResolution No.wasadoptedbytheCounciloftheCityofGlendale,California,ataregularmeetingheldon the__________dayof
________________,
2024,andthatthesamewasadoptedbythefollowingvote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
CityClerk
24-115
Adopted
06/25/24
Kassakhian/Najarian
All Ayes
25th
June
24-115
25th
June
Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
None
None
None
8c4
Adopted
06/25/24
Brotman/Gharpetian
AllAyes
RESOLUTIONNO.24-116
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA,AUTHORIZINGTHECITYMANAGERORGENERALMANAGEROR
THEIRDESIGNEESTOENTERINTOCONTRACTSFORTHEPURCHASEORSALE
OFENERGYCOMMODITIESANDSERVICES(NATURALGASORELECTRIC
ENERGY,INCLUDINGRENEWABLEANDCARBONATTRIBUTESANDTHE
TRANSFEROFINITIATINGANDCLEARINGBROKERSERVICES)FORATERM
NOTTOEXCEEDFIVEYEARSINDURATIONANDDISPENSINGWITH
COMPETITIVEBIDDING
WHEREAS,onJune13,2023,theCityCouncilauthorizedtheCityManageror hisdesignee,ortheGlendaleWater&Power(GWP)GeneralManagerorhisdesignee, toarrangeforthepurchase,sale,storageandtransmissionofelectricenergyandfuels forelectricgeneration,includingrenewableandcarbonattributes,fortermsnotto exceedfiveyearsinduration,includingtheuseoffinancialinstrumentstostabilize prices;and
WHEREAS,saidauthorizationexpiresonJune30,2024andrequiresrenewal annually;and
WHEREAS,theCityandGWPhavesuccessfullyimplementedlastyear’s authorizationthroughtheEnergyRiskManagementPolicyandEnergyTradingAuthority Policytominimizefuelandpowerpurchasecosts.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
GLENDALE,CALIFORNIA:
Section1.PursuanttotheCityCharter,ArticleVI,Section9,theCouncildoes herebyauthorizetheCityManagerorhisdesignee,ortheGeneralManagerorhis designee,toarrangebyletterorcontractualagreement,(i)thepurchase,saleand transmissionofelectricalenergyandcapacity,ancillaryservices,electricaltransmission andtransmissioncapacity,andrenewableandcarbonattributes,oneitherabundlesor unbundledbasis;(ii)tradingincarbonmarkets,includingthepurchaseandsaleofLow CarbonFuelStandardCredits;(iii)thepurchase,sale,storage,schedulingand transportationoffuelsforelectricalgenerationandthetransferofinitiatingandclearing brokersservices,betweentheCityofGlendaleandotherpartiesfortermsnottoexceed fiveyearsinduration.Suchcontractualagreementsmayincludefinancialinstruments forthepurposeofstabilizingprices.ThisauthorizationshallbeineffectthroughJune 30,2025,andtheGeneralManagerofGWPshallbringthisauthorizationbacktothe Councilforreconsiderationonanannualbasis.
Section2.TheCouncildoesherebyclarifythattheterm“financialinstruments” inSection1aboveisintendedandacknowledgedtomeanfuturecontracts,options,and swapsunderInternationalSwapsandDerivativesAssociation(‘ISDA”)Master Agreementsorthroughabrokerageaccount,andrelateddocumentswhichwillbeused tohedgeagainstpricefluctuationsinboththefuelsforelectricgenerationandelectric energymarkets.
SdI
Section 3. The Council hereby finds that pursuant to Glendale City Charter Article VI, Section 9, that said transactions must be completed in a rapidly changing energy market and that it is not practical nor in the City’s best interest, to subject these transactions to the City of Glendale’s bidding requirements, and therefore the Council hereby dispenses with competitive bidding for these transactions.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this 25thday of June 2024.
6 ayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I, Suzie Abajian PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-116 was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June , 2024, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
City Clerk
PPROV ASTOM 2
HIEFASSISTA CI AITOR EY
DATE 7 2-
Adopted
06/25/24
Gharpetian/Kassakhian
AllAyes
RESOLUTIONNO.24-117
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
GLENDALE,CALIFORNIAAPPOINTINGMICHELEFLYNNAS
INTERIMDIRECTOROFFINANCEPURSUANTTO
GOVERNMENTCODESECTIONS7522.56AND21221(H)
WHEREAS,GovernmentCodeSection21221(h)addressesthetemporary employmentofretireesinaccordancewiththePublicEmployees’RetirementLaw,as administeredbytheCaliforniaPublicEmployees’RetirementSystem(CaIPERS),and permitstheCityCounciltoappointaretiredannuitantto avacantpositionrequiring specializedskillsduringrecruitmentforapermanentappointment,andprovidesthatsuch appointmentwillnotsubjecttheretiredpersontoreinstatementfromretirementorlossof benefitssolongasitisasingleappointmentthatdoesnotexceed960hoursinafiscal year;and
WHEREAS,thepositionofDirectorofFinancefortheCityofGlendalewillbe vacant,effectiveJune26,2024.
WHEREAS,duringthe recruitment,selectionandfinalemploymentofaregular DirectorofFinance,theCouncildesirestoappointMicheleFlynnasaretiredannuitant interimappointmenttothevacantpositionofDirectorofFinancefortheCityunder GovernmentCodesection21221(h),effectiveJune26,2024,toprovidetheleadership, managerial,technicalandorganizationalskillsnecessarytoperformthefunctionsofthe DirectorofFinance;and
WHEREAS,MicheleFlynnhassignificantexperiencewithanextensivehistoryin municipalfinance,includingalmost22yearsofprogressivelyresponsiblefinanceand auditpositionswiththeCityofGlendale,including2.5yearsastheDirectorofFinance; and
WHEREAS,anappointmentunderGovernmentCodesection21221(h)requires anactive,publiclypostedrecruitmentforaregularreplacement;and WHEREAS,anannouncementfortherecruitmentfortheDirectorofFinance positionwillbepostedathttps://www.glendaleca.gov/government’departments/human resourcesnolaterthanthedaythatMs.FlynncommencesherappointmentasDirector ofFinanceonaninterimbasis;and
WHEREAS,thisGovernmentCodeSection21221(h)appointmentshallonlybe madeonceandthereforewillendonthedateimmediatelyprecedingthedateonwhich theregularappointmenttothevacantpositionofDirectorofFinancefortheCity commenceshisorheremployment,orifearlier,orthedatethatthisappointmentis terminatedbytheCityorMs.Flynn;and
18e1
p
WHEREAS, the employment agreement between Michele Flynn and the City has been reviewed by this body and is attached as Exhibit 1 to the Report to Council dated June 25, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, it is understood by the City and Michele Flynn that the combined total hours to be served by Michele Flynn in any fiscal year, for all positions and for all CaIPERS employers combined, shall not exceed the 960-hour limitation set forth in California Government Code Section 21221(h) and Section 7522.56(d); and WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and WHEREAS, the minimum monthly salary for the Director of Finance position is $13,675.20 and the hourly equivalent is $78.90 per hour, and the maximum monthly salary for this position is $20,416.00 and the hourly equivalent is $1 17.79; and WHEREAS, the hourly rate to be paid to Michele Flynn for her services as Director of Finance on an interim basis is $117.79, subject to any subsequent adjustment to the payrate as adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Michele Flynn has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or any other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 7522.56(e)(1), Michele Flynn must certify in writing to the City, upon accepting an offer of employment, that she has not received any unemployment insurance compensation arising out of prior employment with a public employer that is subject to Section 7522.56 during the 12-month period preceding the effective date of this appointment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of Glendale, California as follows:
Section 1. The Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. Michele Flynn has the specialized skills needed to perform the work required of fulfill the responsibilities of the vacant position of Director of Finance on an interim basis until a permanent Director of Finance is appointed and thereafter begins his or her service.
Section 3. The Council hereby appoints Michele Flynn as Directot of Finance on an interim basis effective June 26, 2024 pursuant to the authority provided under 2 Government
Code
section
21221(h),
during
the
recruitment,
selection
and
employment
of
aregular
Director
of
Finance
position,
to
provide
the
critically-needed,
specialized
skills
necessary
to
perform
the
functions
of
the
Director
of
Finance
position.
Section
4. The
employment
agreement
with
Michele
Flynn,
in
substantially
the
form
attached
as
Exhibit
1 to
the
Report
to
Council
dated
June
25,
2024,
which
is
incorporated
herein
by
this
reference
and
will
be
maintained
on
file
with
the
Chief
Human
Resources
Officer,
is
approved
by
the
Council.
Section
5. The
City
Manager
is
authorized
to
execute
said
agreement
on
behalf
of
the
City,
with
such
technical
amendments
as
may
be
deemed
appropriate
by
the
City
Manager
and
City
Attorney.
ADOPTED
by
the
Council
of
the
Glendale,
California
on
the
25th
day
of
June,
2024,
by
the
following
vote:
Mayor
ATTEST:City
Clerk
3 S
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA
) SS
COUNTY
OF
LOS
ANGELES
)
I,
Suzie
Abajian,
Ph.D.,
City
Clerk
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
California,
certify
that
the
foregoing
Resolution No.24-117
was
adopted
by
the
Council
of
the
Glendale,
California,
at
a
regular
meeting
held
on
the 25th
day
of
June,
2024,
and
that
same
was
adopted
by
the
following
vote:
Ayes:
Brotman,
Gharpetian,
Kassakhian,
Najarian,
Asatryan
Noes:
NoneNone
Absent:
None
Abstain:
City
Clerk
A
PAOV
DASTOFO
M
A
I
ASSISTf
ICI
DATE
7t2
4 Adopted
06/25/24
Brotman/Gharpetian
AllAyes
RESOLUTIONNO.24-81
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
GLENDALEINITIATINGTHEFISCALYEAR2024-2025LEVYOF
ANNUALASSESSMENTANDORDERINGTHEPREPARATIONOF
THEENGINEER’SREPORTFORTHENORTHSANFERNANDO
ROADCORRIDORLANDSCAPEMAINTENANCEDISTRICT
WHEREAS,theLandscapingandLightingActof1972,StreetsandHighwaysCode, Subsection22620,etseq.,(the“Act”)requirestheCitytocompletethelevyofannual assessment;and
WHEREAS,theActrequirestheCitytocompletethelevyofannualassessmentpriorto August10thofeachyearortheconsentoftheCountyAuditormustfirstbeobtained;and WHEREAS,inordertoundertakethelevyofannualassessmentfortheNorthSan FernandoRoadCorridorLandscapeMaintenanceDistrict(the“District”),theCityCouncilmust firstadoptaresolutiongenerallydescribinganyproposednewimprovementsoranysubstantial changesinexistingimprovementsintheDistrictandorderingtheEngineertoprepareandfilea report.SaidEngineer’sReportproposestoestablishanassessmentratebasedontheaverage assessmentrepresentingtheaveragebetweentheassessmentcomputedbasedonfrontageor averagelotwidth;andtheassessmentcomputedbasedontheareaofthelot.
WHEREAS,theActalsospecifiesthatapublichearingtohearanyobjectionstothe proposedannuallevyofassessmentbescheduled,andsaidpublichearingwillbefixedatthe timetheCityCounciladoptsaresolutiondeclaringitsintenttolevyandcollecttheannual assessment;and
WHEREAS,tocompletethelevyofannualassessmentinaproperandtimelymanner, theCityCouncilisinitiatingthe2024/2025FiscalYearassessmentbyadoptingthisResolution pursuanttoStreetsandHighwaysCode,§22622,generallydescribinganyproposednew improvements,orderingtheEngineertoprepareandfileareport,andsettingapublichearing datetohearanyobjectionsontheproposedlevyofannualassessment.
NOW,THEREFORE,THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALEDOES
HEREBYRESOLVEASFOLLOWS:
SECTION1.TheCityCouncilordersthepreparationandfilingoftheFiscalYear 2024/2025Engineer’sReportforNorthSanFernandoRoadCorridorLandscapeMaintenance DistrictinaccordancewithArticle4(commencingwithSection22565)ofChapter1ofthe CaliforniaStreetsandHighwaysCode.SaidEngineer’sReportshallincludeexistingand proposedpublicimprovementsauthorizedbylaw,including:
1.Installationorplantingoflandscaping;
2.Installationofcurbs,guffers,walls,sidewalks,orpaving,orwater,irrigationsystems, drainage,orelectricalfacilities;and
3.Themaintenanceorservicing,orboth,ofanyoftheforegoing. 8f1
SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to affix his/her signature to this Resolution indicating City Council’s approval and the City Clerk, or his/her duly appointed deputy, is instructed to attest thereto.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 25th day of June, 2024.
Mayor “
ATTEST:
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF GLENDALE
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-81 was duly adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June , 2024 and
that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
None
ABSTAIN:
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
PROVtbASTOORM
—tHI ASSISTA I TY A ORNEY
DATE 7 t 2
Adopted
06/25/24
Brotman/Gharpetian
All Ayes
RESOLUTION NO. 24-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY
REPORT REGARDING THE NORTH SAN FERNANDO ROAD CORRIDOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT AND THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolution, ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report (hereafter referred to as the "Report") regarding the assessment district designated as the "North San Fernando Road Corridor Landscape Maintenance District" (hereafter referred to as the "District"), and the levy and collection of assessments related thereto for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the "Act"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Report as required by Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 22586 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Report as presented, and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, the improvements described therein, each and all of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the proposed annual assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements, operation, administration, maintenance and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Report.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The preceding recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. The Report consists of the following:
• A Description of Improvements.
• A Diagram of the District.
• The proposed Annual Budget for the fiscal year (Costs and Expenses). • The Method of Apportionment that details the method of calculating each parcel's proportional special benefits and annual assessment.
• The District Roll containing the Levy for each Assessor Parcel Number within the District commencing Fiscal Year 2024-2025.
SECTION 3. The District and the associated assessments as outlined in the Engineer's Report are in compliance with the provisions of California Constitution Article XIIID. 8f2
Adopted
06/25/24
Brotman/Gharpetian
AllAyesRESOLUTIONNO.24-83
ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE
DECLARINGITSINTENTIONTOLEVYANDCOLLECTTHEANNUAL
ASSESSMENTWITHINTHENORTHSANFERNANDOROAD
CORRIDORLANDSCAPEMAINTENANCEDISTRICTFORFISCALYEAR
2024-2025PURSUANTTOTHELANDSCAPINGANDLIGHTINGACTOF
1972,PART2OFDIVISION15,OFTHECALIFORNIASTREETSAND
HIGHWAYSCODE,ANDSETTINGTHETIMEANDPLACEOFTHE
HEARINGONOBJECTIONSTHERETO
WHEREAS,theCityCouncilhas,bypreviousResolutions,formedtheNorthSan FernandoRoadCorridorLandscapeMaintenanceDistrict(hereinafterreferredtoasthe “District”),andhasinitiatedproceedingsforFiscalYear2024-2025,pursuanttotheprovisions oftheLandscapingandLightingActof1972,Part2ofDivision15oftheStreetsandHighways CodeofCalifornia,beginningwithSection22500(hereinafterreferredtoasthe“Act”) authorizingthelevyingandcollectionofassessmentsbytheCountyofLosAngelesfortheCity ofGlendaleinordertopaythemaintenanceandservicesofallimprovementsandfacilities relatedthereto;and
WHEREAS,theboundariesoftheDistrictgenerallyincludetheparcelsoflandbounded byLindenAvenuetotheNorth,SanFernandoRoadtotheEast(includingpropertiesonthe eastsideofSanFernandoRoad),FairmontAvenueandHighway134totheSouth,and Interstate5totheWest;and
WHEREAS,inordertomaintainpubliclandscapingwithintheDistrictforFiscalYear 2024-2025,itistheintentionoftheCityCounciltolevyandcollectassessmentspursuanttothe Actforthemaintenance,servicingandoperationoflandscapemaintenancewithinstreet mediansandparkways;and
WHEREAS,referenceisherebymadetotheReportoftheEngineeronfilewiththeCity Clerkandavailableforpublicinspectionforadetaileddescriptionoftheimprovements,the boundariesoftheAssessmentDistrict,andanyzonestherein,andtheproposedassessments uponassessablelotsandparcelsoflandwithintheDistrict(the“Engineer’sReport”);and WHEREAS,theEngineer’sReportanalyzedDistrictneeds,associatedcosts,thebenefit topropertieswithintheDistrictanddeterminedthattheFiscalYear2024-2025assessment needshouldbebasedinproportiontotheestimatedbenefitstobereceivedbysuchproperties, andthatallbenefitingproperties,includingpublicagencies,willbeassessedtheirproportionate shareofthecostsoftheDistrict.
NOW,THEREFORE,BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
GLENDALE,ASFOLLOWS:
SECTION1.NOTICEISHEREBYGIVENthattheCityCouncilherebyfixesTuesday, July9,2024,at6:00p.m.,intheGlendaleCityHallCouncilChambers,locatedat613E.
Broadway,Glendale,California91206,asthetimeandplaceforhearingprotestsorobjections totheproposedimprovements,andtothelevyandcollectionoftheproposedassessmentfor FiscalYear2024-2025.Allinterestedpersonsshallbeaffordedtheopportunitytohearandbe heard.
8f3
SECTION 2. Pursuant to the Act, protests may be in writing or oral. Written protests must be filed with the City Clerk, or any person having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of the protest prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Any such protests shall state all grounds of the objection, and if filed by the property owner, shall contain a description sufficient to identify their property.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the heating to be given by causing this Resolution of intention to be published and posted in the manner requited by the Act.
SECTION 4. The Mayor is hereby authorized to affix his/her signature to this Resolution indicating City Council’s approval, and the City Clerk, or his/her duly appointed deputy, is instructed to attest thereto.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 25th day of June, 2024.
Mayor €<
ATTEST:
Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-83 was duly adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of June , 2024 and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
• PPOVb AS T F M Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk
F ASSIST NT ITY A1IORN V
DATE
2