As of 4.4.22 (J. Fukutomi-Jones)
City-Wide Public Art Landmarks RFP Rubric
This Rubric is intended as a tool for Commissioners to utilize in order to accurately and consistently assess each proposal. As a recommended strategy, please apply a rating to each category during the artist/artist team’s design concept presentation proposal. If anything rates less than a “5” please include a comment for discussion.
5 – Excellent, hits all the marks
4 – Very good, could use some improvement
3 – Good, but needs more work
2 – Not great, will need substantial work to improve
1 – Not acceptable and all and needs complete revision
How well has the Artist/Artist Team addressed: Rating Comments Parameters set out in the RFP guidelines:
o Physical engagement with the public
o Creating multiple visual angles and approaches
o All day activation - Day and night
o Utilization of creative mediums
o Artwork sustainability and conservation
Is the artwork relevant to the City’s stated purpose for these projects?
o World-class public artwork
o Designed to engage community
o Showcase cultural diversity
o Enhance civic and public spaces
Expected life span of the project.
The proposed materials are high quality and
appropriate for the project.
Maintenance requirements that will need to be met by
the City are affordable and easy to implement.
Artist/Artist Team has addressed liability concerns
and/or ensured that the work is not susceptible to
theft, damage, or vandalism.
EXHIBIT D