Agenda packet, first session — Glendale City Council, October 1, 2024

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
Meetings

are

broadcast

live

Glendale

TV,

viewable

Spectrum

Cable,

channel

and

AT&T

U-
verse,

channel

99. Meetings

are

also

streamed

live

high

definition

(HD)

the

City

webpage,
glendaleca.gov/live
,

YouTube.com/myglendale
,

and

Apple

TV,

Roku,

Amazon

Fire,

iOS

and
Android

devices

using

free

app

called

Cablecast

and

choosing

"Glendale

TV"

from

the

menu.

Meetings

are

also

archived

the

City

Website

for

viewing

anytime

glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

Call

(818)

548-4013

for

program

schedules.

For

public

comments

and

questions

during

the
meeting,

call

(818)

937-8100.

Public

comments

specific

agenda

item

will

taken

when

that
agenda

item

discussed.

you

have

any

question

about

matters

the

agenda,

requests

for
assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours.

PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION In

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

The

City

Clerk’

office

should

notified

72 hours

(three
business

days)

soon

practicable

for

requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and
Braille

transcription

services.

All

documents

open

session

items

this

agenda

that

are
received

less

than

72 hours

prior

this

meeting,

and

are

public

records,

will

available

for

review
in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Translation

services

are

provided

for

meetings

through

the

use

bilingual

staff

for

speakers

who
wish

utilize

the

service

available.

Speakers

should

state

their

request

contacting

the

City
Clerk’s

office

(818)

548-2090,

least

72 hours

prior

the

scheduled

meeting

soon

as
practicable.

Please

specify

the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

City
provided

interpreters

not

required

and

persons

are

welcome

use

their

own

interpreter

speak
in their native language.

OCTOBER 1, 2024

ROLL CALL

1. CLOSED SESSION
– 1:00 PM ( To Commence at 3:00 PM)
a.

Conference with Legal Counsel. Anticipated Litigation - Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:

Two potential cases

1 TYPED 9/26/2024 1:51:18 PM
10 01 24
CC

Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Najarian v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. Case No. 24STCP02101; Claim of Najarian, No. 25-0009 c.

Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Onnig Bulanikian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Michele Flynn, Bradley Calvert and Mark Berry. Property Location: 440 and 444 W.

Cypress St., 1275, 1291-1295, and 1295A Los Angeles St., and 448 Fernando Ct.

Negotiating Parties: CPD Los Angeles LLC. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of payment for the acquisition of property d.

Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiator: Bradley Calvert. Negotiating Party: Erik Khojoyan. Property: 1401 N. Verdugo Road.

Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of payment for the lease of City-owned property

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
– 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a.

Flag Salute: Mayor Elen Asatryan
b.

Invocation: Dr. Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
c.

Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the October 1, 2024 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on September 26, 2024, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.

Agenda Preview for the Meetings of Tuesday, October 8, 2024 b.

Proclamation Designating the Month of October 2024, as Menopause Awareness Month

4. CONSENT ITEMS
(Including Minutes)
The following are Routine and May be Acted Upon by One Motion. Any Member of Council or the Audience Requesting Separate Consideration May do so by Making Such Request Before Motion is Proposed.
a.

City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Special City Council and Joint City Council and Housing Authority Meetings of September 17, 2024
b.

Finance, re:

Escheatment - Unclaimed Checks & Deposits

1. Motion to escheat unclaimed checks and deposits held by various funds of the City pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057
c.

Public Works, re:

Award of Construction Contract for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project

1. Motion awarding a construction contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. in the amount of $8,262,128, approving a 15 percent contract contingency in the amount of $1,239,319, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the contract

2. Resolution of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $9,864,553 for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project d.

City Attorney, re:

Request for Proposals for Official Police Tow Services

1. Resolution Adopting the Police Department’s Request for Proposals for Towing and Storage Services and Authorizing the City Clerk to Advertise for Proposals

2 TYPED 9/26/2024 1:51:18 PM
10 01 24
CC

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-Minutes; 5-Speaker Limit) Per Mayor Policy, This Item Also Permits Speakers Wishing to Speak Under General Oral Communications, Subject to the Three Minute Time Limit. Discussion is Limited to Matters Not on the Agenda.

7. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

8. ACTION ITEMS
a.

Glendale Water and Power, re: Revisions to the Public Benefits Charge (PBC) and Reallocation of 2018-2024 PBC Funds to Authorized Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency Customer Incentives

1. Introduction of Ordinance amending Section13.44.425 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, pertaining to the current Public Benefits Charge of 3.6% to the rate mandated by State law

2. Resolution adopting 2.85% as the Public Benefits Charge, pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, Section 13.44.425, effective November 7, 2024

3. Motion declaring the allocation and use of funds collected from the 0.75% increase in Public Benefits Charge inadvertently collected from July 1, 2018, through November 6, 2024, for all authorized renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand response, and energy efficiency customer incentives

4. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $3,394,937 from the 2018-24 0.75% Public Benefits Charge, plus all additional unspent PBC revenues collected therefrom through November 6,2024, to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program” to fund energy efficiency enhancements

5. Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $3,394,937, and all additional unspent revenues from the 2018-24 0.75% Public Benefits Charge collected through November 6, 2024, to fund energy efficiency enhancements to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program”
b.

Public Works, re:

Authorize Cooperative Agreement for Foothill Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP)

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Glendale and the County of Los Angeles for the Foothill Boulevard TSSP

2. Resolution of appropriation to appropriate $499,800 in Measure R Local Return Funds for the Foothill Boulevard TSSP
c.

City Manager, re: Appointments to Fill Vacancies on Various Agencies

1. Motion designating a voting delegate and alternate representative(s) for the 2024 League of California Cities Conference

2. Motion appointing an individual to serve as an alternate on the Arroyo Verdugo Communities JPA

3. Motion appointing an individual to serve as an alternate on the Burbank-Glendale- Pasadena Regional Housing Trust

4. Motion appointing two individuals to serve as a primary and alternate on California Contract Cities Association (CCCA)

5. Motion appointing two individuals to serve as a primary and alternate on Independent Cities Association (ICA)

3 TYPED 9/26/2024 1:51:18 PM
10 01 24
CC

9. HEARINGS

10. REPORTS - INFORMATION

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

13. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is Limited to Items NOT a Part of this Agenda. Each Speaker is Allowed 5 minutes.

Council May Question or Respond to The Speaker But There Will be no Debate or Decision.

The City Manager May Refer the Matter to the Appropriate Department for Investigation and Report.

14. NEW BUSINESS

15. ADJOURNMENT

4 TYPED 9/26/2024 1:51:18 PM
10 01 24
CC

1 M I N U T E S
JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024
The Joint City Council and Housing Authority Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the Glendale City Hall, Council Chambers, in said City, at 3:15 p.m. on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

September 13, 2024
Date
A JOINT PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council and Housing Authority is hereby called to meet at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, September 17, 2024, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Services and Parks, re: Approval of the Glendale Homeless Action Plan (GHAP)
a. Council Motion to approve the Glendale Homeless Action Plan (GHAP) presented by the Glendale Continuum of Care, and direct staff to initiate implementation of the plan according to the outlined priorities and strategies
b. Housing Authority Motion to approve the Glendale Homeless Action Plan (GHAP) presented by the Glendale Continuum of Care, and direct staff to initiate implementation of the plan according to the outlined priorities and strategies Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Robert Adjinian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Laura Parazian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Mayor Asatryan called the meeting to order at 3:15 p.m.

ROLL CALL
- Absent: Kassakhian (arrived at 3:50 p.m.)
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, September 17, 2024 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on September 13, 2024, on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall.

1. Community Services and Parks, re: Approval of the Glendale Homeless Action Plan (GHAP)
Presenting:

Arsine Isayan, Homeless Programs Manager
4A
5 of 141

2 Public Comments:

Herbert Molano
Laura Duncan
a. Council Motion to approve the Glendale Homeless Action Plan (GHAP) presented by the Glendale Continuum of Care, and direct staff to initiate implementation of the plan according to the outlined priorities and strategies
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows
a.
b. Housing Authority Motion to approve the Glendale Homeless Action Plan (GHAP) presented by the Glendale Continuum of Care, and direct staff to initiate implementation of the plan according to the outlined priorities and strategies Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows
b.

ADJOURNMENT – 4:21 p.m.
- Housing Authority
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Gharpetian
- Council
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Brotman
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
None
None
None
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Adjinian, Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian None
Parazian
None
Mayor of the City of Glendale
Chair of the Glendale Housing Authority
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
Clerk of the Glendale Housing Authority
6 of 141

1 M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Hall Council Chambers, in said City, at 4:21 p.m. on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

September 13, 2024
Date
A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, September 17, 2024, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Development, re: Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement Direction a. Council motion to provide direction on the methodology of Code Enforcement action Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 p.m. September 13, 2024 Glendale, CA Mayor Asatryan called the meeting to order at 4:21 p.m.

ROLL CALL
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, September 17, 2024, Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on September 13, 2024, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

1. Community Development, re: Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement Direction Staff Comment:

Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Presenting:

Tamar Sadd, Deputy Director of Community Development
Public Comments:

Rick Lemmo
Jackie Gish
4A
7 of 141

2 a. Council motion to provide direction on the methodology of Code Enforcement action Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows
ADJOURNMENT – 4:50 p.m.

Moved: Brotman Seconded: Kassakhian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Asatryan
None
None
None
8 of 141

4b
24-86439

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Escheatment - Unclaimed Checks & Deposits
1) Motion to escheat unclaimed checks and deposits held by various funds of the City pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for October 1, 2024 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On an annual basis, the Finance Department presents to the City Council a list of unclaimed property that meet the requirements mandated by Government Code Sections 50050-50057 to escheat funds. The escheatment process, originally scheduled for council review in June 2024, has experienced unforeseen delays.

Consequently, we have had to adjust our timeline to ensure compliance with Government code requirements. Following the postponement, we restarted the escheatment process which required reposting the escheatment list in the local newspaper. As required by the Government Code, the City has made several attempts to return these outstanding funds to the proper individuals by attempting to contact them through a variety of different means. Through these attempts, we have re-issued 62 outstanding checks totaling $68,986.58. We have also received 15 claim forms for outstanding deposits totaling $118,900. After multiple outreach efforts, the remaining unclaimed property is $70,074.90 for outstanding checks and $676,387.65 for outstanding deposits and will escheat to the City on October 1, 2024, if approved by the City Council.
9 of 141

4b2
24-86439
5 4
3 4

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Interim Director of Finance to escheat unclaimed checks and deposits held by various funds of the City pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

ANALYSIS
Escheat is the legal process of lapsing or reverting ownership of unclaimed private property to the government by operation of law. Unclaimed property includes:

1. Checks issued by the City that remain uncashed for six months from the issuance date.

2. Refundable deposits unclaimed for over three years.

3. Checks under $15 that are over one year old.

Per Government Code section 50050, for funds unclaimed for a period of over three years, the City must make every effort to return such funds to the proper individuals.

Government Code Sections 50050-50051 require the list of unclaimed checks and deposits be published as a public notice once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published in the local agency. Section 50052 provides guidelines for the claiming process. The unclaimed funds then become the property of the City on a designated date not less than forty-five days nor more than sixty days after the first publication of the notice. Section 50053 states that when the unclaimed funds become the property of City of Glendale, the Director of Finance may transfer them to the General Fund or to the fund the money was originally drawn from. According to section 50055, any individual check of less than fifteen dollars ($15), which remains unclaimed for a period of at least one year, may be transferred without a publication of notice. Any unclaimed funds will become property of the City on October 1, 2024.

In February 2024, Finance staff obtained a list of outstanding checks from the City Treasurer’s Office that included checks from multiple departments. Staff attempted to reach out to each payee through various methods, including phone, email, and U.S. Mail.

Additionally, AdminSure, the City’s workers’ compensation third-party administrator, reached out to their payees through similar means. Multiple attempts were made to contact each individual and locate the payees. When contact information was unavailable, Finance staff provided relevant departments with lists of payees to assist in outreach efforts. Accounts Payable routinely followed up with each department before publishing the list in the local newspaper and conducting additional outreach. However, due to the postponement of the council date, Finance staff restarted this process in August 2024 by obtaining a new list of outstanding checks from the City Treasurer’s Office and reposting it in the local newspaper.

After extensive outreach efforts over the past few months, there are currently 289 unclaimed checks totaling $70,074.90. To have outstanding checks reissued by Accounts Payable, proper documentation, including a replacement check affidavit, must be submitted to the City Treasurer’s Office. The City Treasurer’s Office will then process the stop payment with the bank and inform Accounts Payable to issue the replacement check. 10 of 141

4b3
24-86439
5 4
3 4
Also in February 2024, Finance staff worked with Public Works and Community Development staff for the list of outstanding deposits. Public Works and Community Development staff contacted each payee through variety of methods including phone, e- mail, and US Mail. Currently, there are thirteen unclaimed deposits in the amount of $8,159.00, which are associated with the Excavation Permits administered by Public Works Department. On the other hand, there are eighty-six unclaimed deposits in the amount of $668,228.65, which are associated with the Construction and Demolition (C&D) Debris Bond administered by Community Development Department.

To obtain excavation permit refund, applicant must submit an application. Public Works staff will review the inspection document to verify the eligibility. Once all requirements are met, Public Works staff request the issuance of the refund through Accounts Payable.

To obtain a C&D Debris Bond refund, applicant must divert 65% of the project’s estimated debris to a certified mixed debris recycling facility and submit Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan Compliance Report within six months of certificate of occupancy. Community Development staff request the issuance of the refund through Accounts Payable once all the requirements are met.

Construction permits associated with the C&D Debris Bond deposits often remain active for more than three years. By the end of a five-year period from issuance, the permits are either expired, or construction projects are completed. Thus, C&D Debris Bond deposits older than five years are subject to the escheatment. The eighty-six C&D Debris Bond deposits were issued before July 2019.

On July 30, 2019, Council approved the amendment of Chapter 8 of the Glendale Municipal Code, related to Construction Demolition Debris, transferring enforcement, responsibility, and administration of the Ordinance from Public Works Department, Integrated Waste Management, to the Community Development Department, Building and Safety Division. The amendment applies to the C&D Debris Bond deposits processed subsequent to the adoption date. All eighty-six deposits in the amount of $668,228.65, were processed prior to the amendment adoption date, and thus, shall be retained by the City to promote waste diversion efforts in the community. (Ord. 5895 §1, 2017).

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The City has gone beyond the state minimum noticing requirements by using variety of different outreach methods. First, staff attempted to contact each payee through a variety of methods including phone, e-mail and US Mail. Next, detailed notices were published in the Glendale Independent on the following dates: April 25 & May 2, 2024 and August 15 and August 22, 2024. A press release was published both times directing the party of interest to the City website with instructions to file a claim for any of the unclaimed funds.

The same notice was also posted on the City of Glendale website and Permit portal page.

As a result of the continued outreach, we have received 15 claim forms totaling $118,900 for outstanding deposits and 62 claim forms totaling $68,986.58 for outstanding checks. 11 of 141

4b4
24-86439
5 4
3 4

FISCAL IMPACT
If approved by the Council, the escheated funds total $746,462.55:

General Fund $10,670.68
Refuse Disposal Fund $676,568.57
Housing Assistance Fund $18,520.00
Electric Fund $35,407.57
Compensation Insurance Fund $5,295.73
Total $746,462.55
Finance Department will continue to accept claim forms and the final escheated amount will be adjusted accordingly based on the number of checks and deposits claimed.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is not subject to CEQA/NEPA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not authorize to escheat the checks and deposits held by various funds of the City pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

Alternative 2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michele Flynn, Interim Finance Director
Prepared by:

Sona Arakelyan, Accounts Payable Supervisor
Steve (Min Jun) Kim, Accountant II
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Outstanding checks and deposits to be escheated Exhibit 2: Copy of Press Release
Exhibit 3: Proof of publication in the Glendale Independent 12 of 141

4b5
24-86439
5 4
3 4
13 of 141

CC_10012024_Motion_4b1.pdf
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that, pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057, any escheated unclaimed property held in the general fund or any special fund is now property of the City, to be held in the account in which the payment was issued or deposit held, as set forth in the Report to Council dated October 1, 2024.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
14 of 141

Exhibit 1: Outstanding Checks & Deposits to be Escheated CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
938456 $1,184.00 9/3/2020 119 E CHESTNUT STREET LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 970941 $8.69 04/05/2022 120 EAST CYPRESS LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 289204 $30,000.00 4/17/2019 520 N CENTRAL PROPERTY OWNER, LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289629 $30,000.00 4/26/2019 520 N CENTRAL PROPERTY OWNER, LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 971246 $9.49 04/12/2022 AAB STEAKHOUSE LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 288478 $626.00 4/1/2019 AARON LUKAESKO ; 347 GROUP, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 931784 $49.28 5/14/2020 ABDULAZIZ ABDULLAH A AL AJAJI UNCLAIMED CHECK 280810 $2,622.15 9/26/2018 ACCURATE DIAL & NAME PLATE, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 290958 $18,000.00 5/31/2019 ACS ADVANCED CONTRACTING SERVICES INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928766 $1,767.00 3/26/2020 ADA IGLESIAS UNCLAIMED CHECK 290622 $626.00 5/21/2019 ADAN DENIZ CASH BOND DEPOSIT
938432 $36.42 8/27/2020 ADRIJANA DJURIC UNCLAIMED CHECK 928124 $45.88 3/12/2020 AFFORDABLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UNCLAIMED CHECK 944651 $3,349.00 12/22/2020 AGMRS LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK
291442 $9,000.00 6/12/2019 ALAIN HIRSCH CONSTRUCTION CORP. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 280802 $720.00 9/26/2018 ALBERT GADIMYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 930112 $34.89 4/16/2020 ALEXA ROSICKY UNCLAIMED CHECK
931169 $244.26 4/23/2020 ALEXANDRA STERGIOS RODRIGUEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 925657 $37.98 1/30/2020 ALI ESBAI UNCLAIMED CHECK
931785 $16.97 5/14/2020 ALINA LALAYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
924326 $21.72 1/16/2020 ALISON G BRAGAW BUTLER UNCLAIMED CHECK 277181 $605.00 7/3/2018 AMWEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940349 $20.36 10/1/2020 ANAWIN VANICHYANUKROCH UNCLAIMED CHECK 281174 $2,000.00 10/4/2018 ANDY KHACHADURIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 280511 $7,200.00 9/19/2018 ANGELA NAZARETYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 925969 $149.09 2/6/2020 ANNIS NAEEM UNCLAIMED CHECK
929868 $26.05 4/9/2020 ANTHONY FISHER UNCLAIMED CHECK
924657 $2,034.00 1/21/2020 ANTONIO M GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK 926460 $2,034.00 2/18/2020 ANTONIO M GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK 979580 $6.87 09/08/2022 ANYTIME FITNESS UNCLAIMED CHECK 979581 $13.67 09/08/2022 ANYTIME FITNESS UNCLAIMED CHECK 290421 $11,200.00 5/15/2019 APPLE HOME DEVELOPER INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291297 $2,300.00 6/7/2019 ARA SHAVERDIANS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 939092 $110.54 9/17/2020 ARAKSI ISAGHOLIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 927688 $177.55 3/3/2020 ARAMEH AVANESIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 283095 $4,600.00 11/20/2018 ARMAN GHEVONDYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 933516 $57.47 6/11/2020 ARMIK SARKEZYANS UNCLAIMED CHECK 931589 $73.94 5/7/2020 AROOSYAK DAVEDIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 940886 $27.12 10/15/2020 ARTAK YENOKYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 934821 $57.75 6/25/2020 ARTUR GYOZALYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942117 $43.25 10/29/2020 ARUSYAK PATANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942370 $22.09 11/5/2020 ASPET ISKANDARIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924680 $971.00 1/21/2020 ASTINE SULEIMANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 939489 $967.00 9/24/2020 ASTINE SULEIMANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 132034 $287.68 6/25/2020 AUDIO RX HEARING SERVICES UNCLAIMED CHECK 924489 $1,474.18 1/21/2020 AURAL A JOSIAH UNCLAIMED CHECK 279833 $6,000.00 9/4/2018 AVONOAK TERRACE ESTATE LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 935040 $97.87 7/2/2020 B A REYNOLDS UNCLAIMED CHECK
928056 $114.55 3/10/2020 BACS HOLDINGS INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 943963 $239.69 12/3/2020 BAIHANYING HOU UNCLAIMED CHECK 932806 $68.68 5/21/2020 BARKEV BAKHCHELLIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 277933 $1,100.00 7/20/2018 BAYSIDE BUILDERS INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 933254 $291.07 6/4/2020 BHAGASEND RIZKYADHI UNCLAIMED CHECK 930117 $57.17 4/16/2020 BRENDA BALSALOBRE UNCLAIMED CHECK 927692 $151.10 3/3/2020 BRENNON RHYS HOOK UNCLAIMED CHECK 130169 $377.14 4/8/2020 BURBANK PODIARTY ASSOCIATE UNCLAIMED CHECK 131830 $8.39 6/17/2020 CARLOS ALPUERTO UNCLAIMED CHECK
935042 $81.61 7/2/2020 CAROLINA SILVA UNCLAIMED CHECK
277218 $2,200.00 7/5/2018 CAROLINA TOMMASINO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 976117 $5.40 07/07/2022 CAYLA PALMIER UNCLAIMED CHECK
931174 $654.00 4/23/2020 CENTRAL MEDICAL CENTER UNCLAIMED CHECK 286816 $30,000.00 2/22/2019 CETTG GLENDALE LLC C/O ; JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938132 $186.49 8/20/2020 CHAO YANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
945381 $52.49 12/29/2020 CHRIS HAGMAIER UNCLAIMED CHECK 130623 $5.86 4/28/2020 CHRISTINA MADRID UNCLAIMED CHECK 15 of 141

CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
979584 $4.62 09/08/2022 CHRISTOPHER PALMER UNCLAIMED CHECK 930119 $54.66 4/16/2020 CLARISA MELENDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 936732 $72.75 7/30/2020 CODY KIMURA UNCLAIMED CHECK
940888 $99.85 10/15/2020 CONRAD RYMAREK UNCLAIMED CHECK 265340 $7,800.00 9/27/2017 CORCON CASH BOND DEPOSIT
943214 $4,416.00 11/24/2020 CORNERSTONE R/E MANAGEMENT, INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 132945 $72.10 8/6/2020 CRAIG YOUNG UNCLAIMED CHECK
927628 $149.59 3/3/2020 CRISTOBAL MATIAS ROCHA UNCLAIMED CHECK 278148 $1,100.00 7/25/2018 CUSTOM HOME CRAFT, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 279526 $5,700.00 8/27/2018 D.D. ENTERPRIZE INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979430 $6.03 09/01/2022 DAFNE JACOBS UNCLAIMED CHECK
973156 $6.42 05/12/2022 DANIEL CHO UNCLAIMED CHECK
927794 $31.03 3/5/2020 DARRAN MCGOVERN UNCLAIMED CHECK
924494 $240.23 1/21/2020 DARSHANKUMAR VASWANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 935044 $38.97 7/2/2020 DARWIN CARRENO UNCLAIMED CHECK
932973 $153.53 5/28/2020 DAVIT KOCHARYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942124 $126.02 10/29/2020 DAVIT POGHOSYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 928634 $203.60 3/26/2020 DAWEI LIANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
969626 $2.74 03/17/2022 DELBERT RISING UNCLAIMED CHECK
931302 $95.00 4/30/2020 DIANE M PETERSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 981116 $14.43 09/29/2022 DIEGO TADEO MARTINEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 281865 $9,600.00 10/23/2018 DOUG NELSON CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979594 $14.08 09/08/2022 DUMAS ARCHITECT UNCLAIMED CHECK 925978 $128.63 2/6/2020 DUNCAN PIERCE BULLEN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924337 $234.13 1/16/2020 DYLAN KING WELTER UNCLAIMED CHECK 290866 $8,100.00 5/29/2019 EAGLES 1 LLC 11-18 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291726 $4,600.00 6/19/2019 ED O'NEILL CONSTRUCTION INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289576 $2,600.00 4/25/2019 EDGAR AMBARCHYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924340 $19.05 1/16/2020 EDWARD VARTANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 945481 $19.25 12/29/2020 EILEEN YOSEFYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 979595 $7.08 09/08/2022 ELECTROLYSIS BY SONA UNCLAIMED CHECK 926245 $22.03 2/13/2020 ELIZA DASCHI UNCLAIMED CHECK
935270 $84.77 7/9/2020 ELIZABETH HATFIELD UNCLAIMED CHECK 925980 $25.58 2/6/2020 ELIZABETH LOMBARDO UNCLAIMED CHECK 931178 $89.45 4/23/2020 ELMIRA ALLAHBAKHSHI HAFSHEJANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 135591 $7.00 11/30/2020 ERIC MEYER UNCLAIMED CHECK
937252 $55.78 8/20/2020 ERIC SALLEE UNCLAIMED CHECK
151482 $6.25 09/28/2022 ERIN ANDERSON UNCLAIMED CHECK
937086 $424.35 8/13/2020 ERIN E. HIMES UNCLAIMED CHECK
935489 $143.33 7/16/2020 ETA REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 280440 $4,500.00 9/18/2018 EZ HOME PERMITS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938440 $274.39 8/27/2020 FAITH & HOPE HOME HEALTH UNCLAIMED CHECK 936479 $184.92 7/23/2020 FICREST ELECTRIC INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 979600 $6.87 09/08/2022 FRESCO RISTORANTE UNCLAIMED CHECK 290712 $12,000.00 5/23/2019 FRONTLINE STC, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289753 $12,600.00 4/30/2019 FULL ECLIPSE STUDIOS, LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938136 $68.05 8/20/2020 FUMITAKE KARASHIMA UNCLAIMED CHECK 925984 $121.94 2/6/2020 GABRIEL TORRES UNCLAIMED CHECK
977076 $1.00 07/28/2022 GAGIK ADAMYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
978508 $1.00 08/18/2022 GAGIK ADAMYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
980453 $1.00 09/22/2022 GAGIK ADAMYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
981991 $1.00 10/20/2022 GAGIK ADAMYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
983689 $1.00 11/22/2022 GAGIK ADAMYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
975083 $14.09 06/23/2022 GALI LAZAR UNCLAIMED CHECK
934878 $34.52 6/30/2020 GARNIK AGHAJANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 279996 $7,200.00 9/7/2018 GENESIS ALTURA VIEJO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283201 $626.00 11/21/2018 GEVIK KESHISHZADEH CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928996 $787.00 3/26/2020 GLEN VIA APTS UNCLAIMED CHECK
132950 $227.13 8/7/2020 GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER#OCCUPATIO UNCLAIMED CHECK 132951 $154.77 8/7/2020 GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER#OCCUPATIO UNCLAIMED CHECK 925845 $2,000.00 2/4/2020 GLENVIEW PROFESSIONAL BUILDING LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 927632 $2,000.00 3/3/2020 GLENWOOD LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK
285842 $2,600.00 2/1/2019 GOLDEN TREFLE INVESTMENT INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 971469 $4.86 04/19/2022 GONZALO DE LA CERDA UNCLAIMED CHECK 944579 $165.70 12/22/2020 GUILHERM COSTA UNCLAIMED CHECK 289519 $626.00 4/24/2019 GUSTAVO D SPOLIANSKY CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283988 $3,500.00 12/13/2018 H & S HOME BUILDERS INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 16 of 141

CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
937169 $218.46 8/13/2020 HAMOUD ABDULRAHMAN H ALQAHTANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 927698 $107.36 3/3/2020 HANNA LEE UNCLAIMED CHECK
936950 $132.14 8/6/2020 HE WON EOUM UNCLAIMED CHECK
282047 $1,080.00 10/26/2018 HECTOR ROSALES CASH BOND DEPOSIT 929889 $35.93 4/9/2020 HECTOR TORRES UNCLAIMED CHECK
924046 $34.51 1/9/2020 HEE J SONG UNCLAIMED CHECK
940355 $91.03 10/1/2020 HELEN SHAHBAZIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 928641 $16.07 3/26/2020 HENRI KHODABAKHSHIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 289805 $1,050.00 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289805 $1,350.00 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289805 $900.00 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289805 $2,250.00 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 930161 $15.77 4/16/2020 HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM UNCLAIMED CHECK 930162 $97.20 4/16/2020 HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM UNCLAIMED CHECK 930163 $289.23 4/16/2020 HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM UNCLAIMED CHECK 979607 $4.62 09/08/2022 HOVIG KRIKORIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 979608 $13.67 09/08/2022 HOVIG KRIKORIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 936481 $4,682.98 7/23/2020 HRAYR CHARCHYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 933260 $46.33 6/4/2020 HUGO AMILCAR ESPINOZA LUNA UNCLAIMED CHECK 924351 $103.96 1/16/2020 IRAIZ GOMEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK
245616 $4,500.00 7/8/2016 J.R. ABBOTT CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 149354 $9.00 07/08/2022 JAMES FLORES UNCLAIMED CHECK
127609 $375.00 1/7/2020 JAMES H. SHERMAN, M.D., INC. UNCLAIMED CHECK 927845 $101.89 3/5/2020 JAMES THEO HORN-SMITH UNCLAIMED CHECK 931184 $83.23 4/23/2020 JANET MARTINEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK
938140 $60.80 8/20/2020 JASMINA MULALIC UNCLAIMED CHECK 924049 $18.12 1/9/2020 JASON ERICSON UNCLAIMED CHECK
929891 $55.31 4/9/2020 JASON HUGHES UNCLAIMED CHECK
929892 $17.85 4/9/2020 JASON J LEWIS UNCLAIMED CHECK
925995 $763.75 2/6/2020 JASON SANABRIA UNCLAIMED CHECK
129767 $10.92 3/24/2020 JEREMY FRAZIER UNCLAIMED CHECK
187991 $6,000.00 11/6/2013 JEROME JULIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 934349 $817.00 6/25/2020 JERRY KING UNCLAIMED CHECK
290851 $3,000.00 5/29/2019 JESUS MURO ; SWAIN SIGN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928295 $22.65 3/17/2020 JIAHAO WANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
933524 $60.87 6/11/2020 JOAN ASLAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
935493 $119.47 7/16/2020 JOEL VILLANUEVA UNCLAIMED CHECK 279505 $7,950.00 8/27/2018 JOHN ARMSTRONG CASH BOND DEPOSIT 933414 $35.00 6/11/2020 JOHN BARTON UNCLAIMED CHECK
274061 $3,900.00 4/25/2018 JOHN EPPERLY CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928075 $43.96 3/10/2020 JOHN G COTREL UNCLAIMED CHECK
924917 $2,368.00 1/21/2020 JOHN JAMES LYTLE UNCLAIMED CHECK 927847 $167.89 3/5/2020 JOHN PAUL RICARDO UNCLAIMED CHECK 936741 $74.18 7/30/2020 JOHN PHILLIPS UNCLAIMED CHECK
928643 $25.01 3/26/2020 JONATHAN STEN LARSSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 938899 $22.17 9/10/2020 JOSE HURTADO UNCLAIMED CHECK
942134 $37.42 10/29/2020 JOSHUA SOBEL UNCLAIMED CHECK
927848 $18.54 3/5/2020 JUEFEI LIU UNCLAIMED CHECK
976674 $12.17 07/21/2022 JULIANA HARO UNCLAIMED CHECK
943787 $215.71 11/24/2020 JULIE DE BEAUREPAIRE UNCLAIMED CHECK 287506 $9,900.00 3/31/2019 JUST SIGN IT SERVICES CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938442 $605.67 8/27/2020 JUSTIN TANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
935054 $376.05 7/2/2020 JUSTIN THOMAS CONROY UNCLAIMED CHECK 924355 $57.28 1/16/2020 JUWON LEE UNCLAIMED CHECK
936488 $28.98 7/23/2020 KAI SCHULZ UNCLAIMED CHECK
938667 $61.22 9/3/2020 KAREN DALLAKYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
282864 $626.00 11/14/2018 KATHERINE MARTIN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924050 $25.49 1/9/2020 KATHY F DOLAR UNCLAIMED CHECK
925723 $128.80 1/30/2020 KENDRA SWINTON UNCLAIMED CHECK 133438 $12.88 8/27/2020 KEVIN DIZON UNCLAIMED CHECK
147511 $5.00 04/22/2022 KEVIN DIZON UNCLAIMED CHECK
924051 $223.48 1/9/2020 KEVIN NUSSER UNCLAIMED CHECK
132501 $62.79 7/17/2020 KEVIN STOCKTON UNCLAIMED CHECK
290441 $626.00 5/16/2019 KHACHIK GRIGORIAN; GORIAN DEVELOPMENT CASH BOND DEPOSIT 935275 $60.98 7/9/2020 KHALID MOHSIN A MANSORY UNCLAIMED CHECK 933263 $62.39 6/4/2020 KIANA N FATEMI UNCLAIMED CHECK
931598 $49.58 5/7/2020 LENA N FRIX UNCLAIMED CHECK
926003 $178.10 2/6/2020 LEONID KRASNOV UNCLAIMED CHECK
17 of 141

CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
981119 $5.86 09/29/2022 LEVON SHARAFYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 926004 $23.04 2/6/2020 LIAM VERNER WYNESS UNCLAIMED CHECK 938147 $160.35 8/20/2020 LIDA GHARIBIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 979617 $7.08 09/08/2022 LIHA HOME HEALTHCARE UNCLAIMED CHECK 938443 $109.26 8/27/2020 LILAWATIE GUPTAR UNCLAIMED CHECK 933424 $30.00 6/11/2020 LILIA RODRIGUEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 939315 $102.62 9/24/2020 LINZHOU DAI UNCLAIMED CHECK
944092 $2,000.00 12/10/2020 LLJ OFFICE VENTURES 6, LLC.; OPPERATING ACCOUNT UNCLAIMED CHECK 942379 $611.90 11/5/2020 LOLLI AND POPS UNCLAIMED CHECK 942554 $243.75 11/12/2020 LOUIS-MARIE AKIKI UNCLAIMED CHECK 942829 $18.42 11/19/2020 LUCIA CANALES UNCLAIMED CHECK
287814 $7,500.00 3/31/2019 LUSINE GRIGORYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 286582 $7,000.00 2/15/2019 LUSINE KHACHERYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940895 $111.35 10/15/2020 MALCOM BAUM UNCLAIMED CHECK
128288 $183.00 1/30/2020 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP UNCLAIMED CHECK 129863 $18.30 3/30/2020 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP UNCLAIMED CHECK 130625 $293.45 4/28/2020 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP UNCLAIMED CHECK 931190 $57.69 4/23/2020 MANIAH LANITA WILLIAMS UNCLAIMED CHECK 287560 $6,200.00 3/31/2019 MANN CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 942555 $29.87 11/12/2020 MANOEL FARHAD UNCLAIMED CHECK
128597 $79.78 2/12/2020 MANUEL FERNANDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 924364 $19.31 1/16/2020 MARCO V ANDREINI UNCLAIMED CHECK 286522 $2,200.00 2/14/2019 MARIA QUINONEZ M. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928537 $1,104.17 3/26/2020 MARILYN WARREN; SAC WIRELESS LLC. UNCLAIMED CHECK 927710 $155.51 3/3/2020 MARINA PEREDA AGUIRRE UNCLAIMED CHECK 277922 $2,200.00 7/20/2018 MARINA ZAKARIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287014 $4,846.50 3/1/2019 MARKET CONTRACTORS LTD CASH BOND DEPOSIT 925725 $46.00 1/30/2020 MARLON RICARDO ALLEN UNCLAIMED CHECK 146406 $9.38 03/18/2022 MARTINE DETRO UNCLAIMED CHECK
148070 $9.36 05/17/2022 MARTINE DETRO UNCLAIMED CHECK
977753 $14.06 08/04/2022 MARYKATE HALEY UNCLAIMED CHECK 924369 $56.42 1/16/2020 MESROP VARTANIANS UNCLAIMED CHECK 936492 $278.19 7/23/2020 METEAB ABDULLAH A ALAJLAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 132899 $196.07 8/4/2020 MICHAEL KARLIS UNCLAIMED CHECK
133289 $438.58 8/21/2020 MICHAEL KARLIS UNCLAIMED CHECK 131172 $580.00 5/21/2020 MICHAEL PARKS UNCLAIMED CHECK
924058 $188.77 1/9/2020 MICHAEL WERNER DE WIT UNCLAIMED CHECK 924059 $215.49 1/9/2020 MICHAEL WERNER DE WIT UNCLAIMED CHECK 924060 $241.99 1/9/2020 MICHAEL WERNER DE WIT UNCLAIMED CHECK 289754 $3,000.00 4/30/2019 MIKE MOURADIAN ; NARINE MOURADIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940898 $16.06 10/15/2020 MINGYU DU UNCLAIMED CHECK
944585 $79.10 12/22/2020 MIRAN YAMAMOTO UNCLAIMED CHECK 935059 $44.14 7/2/2020 MISAEL GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK
931523 $223.26 5/7/2020 MOHAMED NASER AL SALMAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 944153 $35.71 12/10/2020 MOHAMMADEBRAHIM NIYAZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 283152 $2,100.00 11/21/2018 MONTROSE CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928089 $32.44 3/10/2020 MOSES HERNANDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 984844 $11.12 12/15/2022 NADER ALKOULI UNCLAIMED CHECK
975969 $10.81 06/30/2022 NARE MELEKYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
981320 $10.71 10/06/2022 NARINE KHIZARCHYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 928655 $57.56 3/26/2020 NAZELI ABASYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
943970 $133.09 12/3/2020 NIKITA ZALEVSKIY UNCLAIMED CHECK 936495 $28.14 7/23/2020 NINA MKRTCHYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
924062 $55.24 1/9/2020 NORA HAMBARCHIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 291722 $2,400.00 6/19/2019 NOVUS DESIGN INTERNATIONAL CASH BOND DEPOSIT 277351 $450.00 7/9/2018 OHANIAN BUILDING CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938149 $144.26 8/20/2020 OLA AHMED MOSTAFA AHMED ABDULLA UNCLAIMED CHECK 282444 $24,000.00 11/5/2018 ONNI 700 BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291697 $4,500.00 6/19/2019 ONNI 700 BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 286715 $18,000.00 2/21/2019 ONNI BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287900 $6,000.00 3/31/2019 ONNI BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 278535 $7,050.00 8/2/2018 OSCAR VERDUGO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287067 $8,550.00 3/1/2019 OSCAR X VERDUGO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940672 $500.00 10/8/2020 PAACHI CHOCOLATES & BASKETS INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 937181 $54.95 8/13/2020 PABLO BARRERA VARGAS UNCLAIMED CHECK 924181 $94.83 1/14/2020 PACIFICA GLENDALE APARTMENTS, LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 939101 $43.98 9/17/2020 PAULA MURO UNCLAIMED CHECK
18 of 141

CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
925095 $3,204.00 1/21/2020 PAULINE BURKE UNCLAIMED CHECK 291368 $30,000.00 6/10/2019 PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291368 $15,000.00 6/10/2019 PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924512 $80.27 1/21/2020 PLANET HOSPICE CARE INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 288497 $600.00 4/1/2019 PLANETWORKS, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 23221 $647.00 12/12/2018 POVAC INVESTMENTS INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287669 $13,800.00 3/31/2019 PR CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 23213 $647.00 11/15/2018 R.D. OLSON CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 281166 $14,250.00 10/4/2018 R.L. CLOTWORTHY CONSTRUCTION, INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 278678 $4,620.00 8/7/2018 R/J BUILDERS, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 930147 $136.85 4/16/2020 RACHEL CREAGAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924065 $241.16 1/9/2020 RAINTREE GLENDALE LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 133332 $48.99 8/24/2020 RALPH GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK
933433 $30.00 6/11/2020 RANDOLPH CHOW UNCLAIMED CHECK
931194 $29.17 4/23/2020 RAQUEL SERRATO UNCLAIMED CHECK
943971 $270.54 12/3/2020 REBEKA ARTASHESHI UNCLAIMED CHECK 290149 $2,400.00 5/8/2019 REID BRUTON CASH BOND DEPOSIT 129049 $39.21 3/2/2020 RICHARD CANTER UNCLAIMED CHECK
279174 $4,050.00 8/17/2018 ROBERT ACKLEY JR CASH BOND DEPOSIT 280862 $40,500.00 9/27/2018 ROBERT ACKLEY JR CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283516 $12,470.00 12/3/2018 ROBERT ACKLEY JR CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287273 $5,000.00 3/31/2019 ROBERT B BOTTCHER; PB CONSTRUCTION CO INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 931731 $38.96 5/14/2020 ROBERT D IGLAUER UNCLAIMED CHECK 284126 $2,200.00 12/18/2018 ROBERT DEHONUSHI CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283231 $2,800.00 11/26/2018 ROBERT HOLMAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 285703 $626.00 1/25/2019 ROGER O; LIGHTHART CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283153 $4,500.00 11/21/2018 RON BEGLEY CASH BOND DEPOSIT 282506 $1,500.00 11/6/2018 RON MEADE CASH BOND DEPOSIT
134326 $34.74 10/5/2020 RONALD E. SEELEY UNCLAIMED CHECK 928311 $34.59 3/17/2020 ROSS KENRY ODONOVAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 927715 $264.99 3/3/2020 ROZELLA STUART KNOX 1997 TRUST UNCLAIMED CHECK 279726 $30,000.00 8/30/2018 RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924376 $189.21 1/16/2020 RUZANNA ABRAAMIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 934841 $110.70 6/25/2020 RUZANNA MELIK-MUSHKAMBARIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 931195 $51.65 4/23/2020 RUZANNA TELUNTS UNCLAIMED CHECK 935062 $119.07 7/2/2020 RYA PICASSO UNCLAIMED CHECK
131417 $50.00 6/2/2020 RYAN INSALACO UNCLAIMED CHECK
942560 $79.47 11/12/2020 RYAN VALDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK
928667 $137.52 3/26/2020 RYANE DANIELLE WOODS UNCLAIMED CHECK 931607 $96.57 5/7/2020 SAMI AL-BOGHOS UNCLAIMED CHECK
976365 $14.78 07/14/2022 SARKIS ATECHYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 935504 $80.77 7/16/2020 SE OK LEE UNCLAIMED CHECK
129038 $79.91 3/2/2020 SEAN RILEY UNCLAIMED CHECK
976680 $10.00 07/21/2022 SEAN STUEFEN UNCLAIMED CHECK
937185 $20.14 8/13/2020 SEAYOUNG SONG UNCLAIMED CHECK
929913 $20.73 4/9/2020 SENG HEI LEI UNCLAIMED CHECK
285314 $2,400.00 1/16/2019 SEVAK ALLAHVERDIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 942149 $90.47 10/29/2020 SHANDIS BEMANIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 939318 $96.29 9/24/2020 SHAOHUA HE UNCLAIMED CHECK
289719 $30,000.00 4/30/2019 SHERMAN CONSULTING SERVICES INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 945491 $96.42 12/29/2020 SHINYIN NAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
944370 $163.77 12/17/2020 SHIQI HUANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
929817 $202.62 4/9/2020 SHIRLEY MAYHEW UNCLAIMED CHECK
926250 $381.89 2/13/2020 SHO OBATA UNCLAIMED CHECK
931197 $139.17 4/23/2020 SHOGIK ZADORIAN MILAGHERDI UNCLAIMED CHECK 943973 $311.61 12/3/2020 SHOHEI UMEKI UNCLAIMED CHECK
149669 $6.25 07/20/2022 SILVIO LANZAS UNCLAIMED CHECK
942562 $48.54 11/12/2020 SIMON WALKER UNCLAIMED CHECK
280855 $11,910.00 9/27/2018 SINANIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT
284077 $2,800.00 12/12/2018 SOFIYA SARGSYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 942385 $126.46 11/5/2020 SONGJUN LI UNCLAIMED CHECK
284737 $2,000.00 1/4/2019 SONYA KALASHYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 935505 $141.16 7/16/2020 SOONA ASJEAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
148150 $10.18 05/18/2022 SPENCER ARMSTRONG UNCLAIMED CHECK 930155 $51.44 4/16/2020 SPENCER B FOSTER UNCLAIMED CHECK 19 of 141

CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
979633 $6.87 09/08/2022 SPRINT WIRELESS EVOLUTION UNCLAIMED CHECK 935064 $57.81 7/2/2020 STEPHEN DENNIS UNCLAIMED CHECK
134969 $63.34 10/29/2020 STEVEN CORRIGAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 130478 $44.30 4/22/2020 STEVEN KOSZIS UNCLAIMED CHECK
938158 $272.91 8/20/2020 SUNGWON LEE UNCLAIMED CHECK
279875 $960.00 9/5/2018 SURIK AVETYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938453 $56.06 8/27/2020 SUSAN AYVAZIANS UNCLAIMED CHECK 928103 $23.66 3/10/2020 SUSAN C PRICE UNCLAIMED CHECK
931802 $92.35 5/14/2020 TARIQ MOHAMMED ALWEHAIBI UNCLAIMED CHECK 935065 $116.08 7/2/2020 TARON LIZAGUB UNCLAIMED CHECK
285151 $3,000.00 1/14/2019 TG & AA INV LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 127686 $1,242.50 1/8/2020 THE IVEY LAW FIRM UNCLAIMED CHECK 938160 $24.61 8/20/2020 THE MOORISH AMERICAN DECENTRALIZED AUTONOMOUS TRUS UNCLAIMED CHECK 940369 $356.15 10/1/2020 TIECHENG ZHANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 241283 $2,000.00 4/4/2016 TIGRAN ARUTYUNYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 282015 $5,250.00 10/25/2018 TIMBERWOLFF CONSTRUCTION, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 282290 $3,000.00 11/1/2018 TIMOTHY HEIDECKER CASH BOND DEPOSIT 927722 $1,363.79 3/3/2020 TOPMAR INC UNCLAIMED CHECK
944371 $23.83 12/17/2020 TORII FORSBERG UNCLAIMED CHECK 133117 $45.00 8/13/2020 TYLER RICHARDSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 979638 $6.87 09/08/2022 UNITED SHIPPING GROUP UNCLAIMED CHECK 935667 $947.24 7/23/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 940826 $50.00 10/15/2020 VAZRIK YOSEFIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 931202 $24.54 4/23/2020 VEICI Y BORJAS UNCLAIMED CHECK
929918 $72.71 4/9/2020 VERJIN AFSHARIAN VAMEGRDIHIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 935509 $383.19 7/16/2020 VERZHIN TOVMASSIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 935510 $103.58 7/16/2020 VICTOR GERARD KALIL UNCLAIMED CHECK 945494 $218.43 12/29/2020 VIGEN YEROMIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 978088 $12.87 08/11/2022 VIKTORIIA IATSENKO UNCLAIMED CHECK 933991 $32.92 6/25/2020 VIKTORIIA KARELINA UNCLAIMED CHECK 280765 $3,200.00 9/26/2018 WALTER BAGRAMYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 135842 $38.76 12/14/2020 WALTER C. GLASS UNCLAIMED CHECK 282885 $626.00 11/15/2018 WALTER SALINAS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287950 $626.00 3/31/2019 WALTER SALINAS ; INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACTOR CASH BOND DEPOSIT 931418 $101.88 4/30/2020 WEN-I HU UNCLAIMED CHECK
149544 $3.07 07/18/2022 WILLIAM FROMMLING UNCLAIMED CHECK 149545 $11.75 07/18/2022 WILLIAM FROMMLING UNCLAIMED CHECK 282520 $7,500.00 11/6/2018 WIN & KIN LLC DBA; BEABEA'S CASH BOND DEPOSIT 939044 $605.00 9/17/2020 WISE CHOICE PLUMBING AND ROOTER INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 939045 $605.00 9/17/2020 WISEMAN CONSTRUCTION PROS,INC. UNCLAIMED CHECK 283252 $18,900.00 11/26/2018 WRIGHT BROTHERS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938672 $92.13 9/3/2020 XIAOTIAN HOU UNCLAIMED CHECK
926024 $52.89 2/6/2020 XIAOYU YAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
942836 $77.66 11/19/2020 XICHENG WANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
285763 $626.00 2/1/2019 YANNIS BAYS ; SBCMD INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940645 $141.21 10/8/2020 YINGHAO ZHAO UNCLAIMED CHECK
290778 $1,500.00 5/28/2019 YOUN S KIM ; YOUNG KI KIM CASH BOND DEPOSIT 936509 $322.59 7/23/2020 YOUNGTAE AHN UNCLAIMED CHECK
975974 $8.56 06/30/2022 YUAN KUANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
924523 $83.45 1/21/2020 YUE JIANG UNCLAIMED CHECK
931420 $65.47 4/30/2020 YUFEI CHEN UNCLAIMED CHECK
934747 $994.00 6/25/2020 YUN S SCOTT UNCLAIMED CHECK
931206 $149.84 4/23/2020 ZANAZAN GYOZALYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 288682 $3,400.00 4/5/2019 ZHANNA SHAHUMYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938911 $121.95 9/10/2020 ZIHAN FAN UNCLAIMED CHECK
928678 $131.27 3/26/2020 ZIJING SU UNCLAIMED CHECK
20 of 141

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 15, 2024

City Media Contact: Stephanie Mkhlian
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 548-4424

Finance Contact: Sona Arakelyan
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 548-3907

City of Glendale Announces Opportunity to Claim Uncashed Checks and Deposits
Glendale, CA – The City of Glendale is working to return unclaimed checks and deposits to their rightful owners. These are checks that haven’t been cashed within six months or deposits that haven’t been claimed for more than three years.

To make this process fair and legal, the City follows state rules (California Government Code Sections 50050-50056) and will publish a notice in the local newspaper for two weeks in a row.

This notice will list all unclaimed checks and deposits. If no one claims the money within 45 to 60 days of the first notice, the funds will become the City’s property.

Some smaller amounts, such as unclaimed funds under $15 that have been outstanding for over a year, may automatically be transferred to the City’s General Fund without a public notice.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, the Director of Finance of the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, declares that the following monetary sums have been held by the Director of Finance and have remained unclaimed and will become the property of the City of Glendale on the 1st day of October 2024.

What You Need to Know:
• If you think you have an unclaimed check or deposit with the City, you can file a claim with the Finance Department.
• Claims must be submitted before October 1, 2024.
• To file a claim, you'll need to provide your name, address, the amount you’re claiming, and the reason for your claim.

How to Get More Information:

Exhibit 2
21 of 141

• You can get the forms you need to claim an uncashed check or unclaimed deposit from the City’s Finance Department, located at 141 N Glendale Ave, Room 346, Glendale, CA 91206, or on the City’s website (add link).
• For questions about unclaimed checks, call the Finance Department’s Accounts Payable Office at (818) 548-3907.
• For questions about unclaimed deposits, call General Accounting at (818) 548-3243.

This process and this notice comply with California Government Code Sections 50050-50056. ###
About Glendale
Known as the “Jewel City,” Glendale is the fourth largest city of Los Angeles County. With a population of more than 200,000, Glendale is a thriving cosmopolitan city that is rich in history, culturally diverse, and offers nearly 50 public parks, and easy access to a municipal airport. It is the home to a vibrant business community, with major companies in healthcare, entertainment, manufacturing, retail, and banking.
22 of 141

HLR MEDIA, LLC LEGAL QUOTES
626-301-1010
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
CHECK/RECEIPT # AMOUNT DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR TYPE
938456 1,184.00$ 9/3/2020 119 E CHESTNUT STREET LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 289204 30,000.00$ 4/17/2019 520 N CENTRAL PROPERTY OWNER, LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289629 30,000.00$ 4/26/2019 520 N CENTRAL PROPERTY OWNER, LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 288478 626.00$ 4/1/2019 AARON LUKAESKO ; 347 GROUP, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 931784 49.28$ 5/14/2020 ABDULAZIZ ABDULLAH A AL AJAJI UNCLAIMED CHECK 280810 2,622.15$ 9/26/2018 ACCURATE DIAL & NAME PLATE, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 290958 18,000.00$ 5/31/2019 ACS ADVANCED CONTRACTING SERVICES INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928766 1,767.00$ 3/26/2020 ADA IGLESIAS UNCLAIMED CHECK 290622 626.00$ 5/21/2019 ADAN DENIZ CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938432 36.42$ 8/27/2020 ADRIJANA DJURIC UNCLAIMED CHECK 928124 45.88$ 3/12/2020 AFFORDABLE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UNCLAIMED CHECK 944651 3,349.00$ 12/22/2020 AGMRS LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 291442 9,000.00$ 6/12/2019 ALAIN HIRSCH CONSTRUCTION CORP. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 280802 720.00$ 9/26/2018 ALBERT GADIMYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 930112 34.89$ 4/16/2020 ALEXA ROSICKY UNCLAIMED CHECK 931169 244.26$ 4/23/2020 ALEXANDRA STERGIOS RODRIGUEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 925657 37.98$ 1/30/2020 ALI ESBAI UNCLAIMED CHECK 931785 16.97$ 5/14/2020 ALINA LALAYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924326 21.72$ 1/16/2020 ALISON G BRAGAW BUTLER UNCLAIMED CHECK 277181 605.00$ 7/3/2018 AMWEST CONSTRUCTION, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940349 20.36$ 10/1/2020 ANAWIN VANICHYANUKROCH UNCLAIMED CHECK 281174 2,000.00$ 10/4/2018 ANDY KHACHADURIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 280511 7,200.00$ 9/19/2018 ANGELA NAZARETYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 925969 149.09$ 2/6/2020 ANNIS NAEEM UNCLAIMED CHECK 929868 26.05$ 4/9/2020 ANTHONY FISHER UNCLAIMED CHECK 924657 2,034.00$ 1/21/2020 ANTONIO M GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK 926460 2,034.00$ 2/18/2020 ANTONIO M GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK 290421 11,200.00$ 5/15/2019 APPLE HOME DEVELOPER INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291297 2,300.00$ 6/7/2019 ARA SHAVERDIANS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 939092 110.54$ 9/17/2020 ARAKSI ISAGHOLIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 927688 177.55$ 3/3/2020 ARAMEH AVANESIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 283095 4,600.00$ 11/20/2018 ARMAN GHEVONDYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 933516 57.47$ 6/11/2020 ARMIK SARKEZYANS UNCLAIMED CHECK 931589 73.94$ 5/7/2020 AROOSYAK DAVEDIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 940886 27.12$ 10/15/2020 ARTAK YENOKYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 934821 57.75$ 6/25/2020 ARTUR GYOZALYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942117 43.25$ 10/29/2020 ARUSYAK PATANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942370 22.09$ 11/5/2020 ASPET ISKANDARIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924680 971.00$ 1/21/2020 ASTINE SULEIMANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 939489 967.00$ 9/24/2020 ASTINE SULEIMANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 132034 287.68$ 6/25/2020 AUDIO RX HEARING SERVICES UNCLAIMED CHECK 924489 1,474.18$ 1/21/2020 AURAL A JOSIAH UNCLAIMED CHECK 279833 6,000.00$ 9/4/2018 AVONOAK TERRACE ESTATE LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 935040 97.87$ 7/2/2020 B A REYNOLDS UNCLAIMED CHECK 928056 114.55$ 3/10/2020 BACS HOLDINGS INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 943963 239.69$ 12/3/2020 BAIHANYING HOU UNCLAIMED CHECK 932806 68.68$ 5/21/2020 BARKEV BAKHCHELLIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 277933 1,100.00$ 7/20/2018 BAYSIDE BUILDERS INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 933254 291.07$ 6/4/2020 BHAGASEND RIZKYADHI UNCLAIMED CHECK 930117 57.17$ 4/16/2020 BRENDA BALSALOBRE UNCLAIMED CHECK 927692 151.10$ 3/3/2020 BRENNON RHYS HOOK UNCLAIMED CHECK 130169 377.14$ 4/8/2020 BURBANK PODIARTY ASSOCIATE UNCLAIMED CHECK

UNCLAIMED CHECKS & UNCLAIMED CASH BOND DEPOSITS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, the Director of Finance of the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, declares that the following monetary sums have been held by the Director of Finance and have remained unclaimed in the funds hereafter indicated for a period of over three (3) years and will become the property of the City of Glendale on the 1st day of October 2024, a date not less than forty-five (45) days nor more than sixty (60) days after first publication of this Notice. Any party of interest may, prior to the date designated herein above, file a claim with the City’s Finance Department, which includes the claimant’s name, address, amount of claim, and the grounds on which the claim is founded. The Unclaimed Check form & Unclaimed Deposit form can be obtained from the City’s Finance Department at 141 N Glendale Ave, Room 346, Glendale, CA 91206 or from the City’s website. For questions regarding unclaimed checks, please contact the City of Glendale, Finance Department, Accounts Payable at (818) 548-3907. For questions regarding unclaimed deposits, please contact City of Glendale, Finance Department, General Accounting at 818-548-3243.

This notice and its contents are in accordance with California Government Code Sections 50050-50056.

Exhibit 3
23 of 141

HLR MEDIA, LLC LEGAL QUOTES
626-301-1010
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
131830 8.39$ 6/17/2020 CARLOS ALPUERTO UNCLAIMED CHECK 935042 81.61$ 7/2/2020 CAROLINA SILVA UNCLAIMED CHECK 277218 2,200.00$ 7/5/2018 CAROLINA TOMMASINO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 931174 654.00$ 4/23/2020 CENTRAL MEDICAL CENTER UNCLAIMED CHECK 286816 30,000.00$ 2/22/2019 CETTG GLENDALE LLC C/O ; JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938132 186.49$ 8/20/2020 CHAO YANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 945381 52.49$ 12/29/2020 CHRIS HAGMAIER UNCLAIMED CHECK 130623 5.86$ 4/28/2020 CHRISTINA MADRID UNCLAIMED CHECK 930119 54.66$ 4/16/2020 CLARISA MELENDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 936732 72.75$ 7/30/2020 CODY KIMURA UNCLAIMED CHECK 940888 99.85$ 10/15/2020 CONRAD RYMAREK UNCLAIMED CHECK 265340 7,800.00$ 9/27/2017 CORCON CASH BOND DEPOSIT
943214 4,416.00$ 11/24/2020 CORNERSTONE R/E MANAGEMENT, INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 132945 72.10$ 8/6/2020 CRAIG YOUNG UNCLAIMED CHECK 927628 149.59$ 3/3/2020 CRISTOBAL MATIAS ROCHA UNCLAIMED CHECK 278148 1,100.00$ 7/25/2018 CUSTOM HOME CRAFT, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 279526 5,700.00$ 8/27/2018 D.D. ENTERPRIZE INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 927794 31.03$ 3/5/2020 DARRAN MCGOVERN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924494 240.23$ 1/21/2020 DARSHANKUMAR VASWANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 935044 38.97$ 7/2/2020 DARWIN CARRENO UNCLAIMED CHECK 932973 153.53$ 5/28/2020 DAVIT KOCHARYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942124 126.02$ 10/29/2020 DAVIT POGHOSYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 928634 203.60$ 3/26/2020 DAWEI LIANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 931302 95.00$ 4/30/2020 DIANE M PETERSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 281865 9,600.00$ 10/23/2018 DOUG NELSON CASH BOND DEPOSIT 925978 128.63$ 2/6/2020 DUNCAN PIERCE BULLEN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924337 234.13$ 1/16/2020 DYLAN KING WELTER UNCLAIMED CHECK 290866 8,100.00$ 5/29/2019 EAGLES 1 LLC 11-18 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291726 4,600.00$ 6/19/2019 ED O'NEILL CONSTRUCTION INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289576 2,600.00$ 4/25/2019 EDGAR AMBARCHYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924340 19.05$ 1/16/2020 EDWARD VARTANYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 945481 19.25$ 12/29/2020 EILEEN YOSEFYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 926245 22.03$ 2/13/2020 ELIZA DASCHI UNCLAIMED CHECK 935270 84.77$ 7/9/2020 ELIZABETH HATFIELD UNCLAIMED CHECK 925980 25.58$ 2/6/2020 ELIZABETH LOMBARDO UNCLAIMED CHECK 931178 89.45$ 4/23/2020 ELMIRA ALLAHBAKHSHI HAFSHEJANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 135591 7.00$ 11/30/2020 ERIC MEYER UNCLAIMED CHECK 937252 55.78$ 8/20/2020 ERIC SALLEE UNCLAIMED CHECK 937086 424.35$ 8/13/2020 ERIN E. HIMES UNCLAIMED CHECK 935489 143.33$ 7/16/2020 ETA REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 280440 4,500.00$ 9/18/2018 EZ HOME PERMITS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938440 274.39$ 8/27/2020 FAITH & HOPE HOME HEALTH UNCLAIMED CHECK 936479 184.92$ 7/23/2020 FICREST ELECTRIC INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 290712 12,000.00$ 5/23/2019 FRONTLINE STC, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289753 12,600.00$ 4/30/2019 FULL ECLIPSE STUDIOS, LLC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938136 68.05$ 8/20/2020 FUMITAKE KARASHIMA UNCLAIMED CHECK 925984 121.94$ 2/6/2020 GABRIEL TORRES UNCLAIMED CHECK 934878 34.52$ 6/30/2020 GARNIK AGHAJANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 279996 7,200.00$ 9/7/2018 GENESIS ALTURA VIEJO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283201 626.00$ 11/21/2018 GEVIK KESHISHZADEH CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928996 787.00$ 3/26/2020 GLEN VIA APTS UNCLAIMED CHECK 132950 227.13$ 8/7/2020 GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER#OCCUPATIO UNCLAIMED CHECK 132951 154.77$ 8/7/2020 GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER#OCCUPATIO UNCLAIMED CHECK 925845 2,000.00$ 2/4/2020 GLENVIEW PROFESSIONAL BUILDING LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 927632 2,000.00$ 3/3/2020 GLENWOOD LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 285842 2,600.00$ 2/1/2019 GOLDEN TREFLE INVESTMENT INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 944579 165.70$ 12/22/2020 GUILHERM COSTA UNCLAIMED CHECK 289519 626.00$ 4/24/2019 GUSTAVO D SPOLIANSKY CASH BOND DEPOSIT 283988 3,500.00$ 12/13/2018 H & S HOME BUILDERS INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 937169 218.46$ 8/13/2020 HAMOUD ABDULRAHMAN H ALQAHTANI UNCLAIMED CHECK 927698 107.36$ 3/3/2020 HANNA LEE UNCLAIMED CHECK
936950 132.14$ 8/6/2020 HE WON EOUM UNCLAIMED CHECK 282047 1,080.00$ 10/26/2018 HECTOR ROSALES CASH BOND DEPOSIT 929889 35.93$ 4/9/2020 HECTOR TORRES UNCLAIMED CHECK 24 of 141

HLR MEDIA, LLC LEGAL QUOTES
626-301-1010
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
924046 34.51$ 1/9/2020 HEE J SONG UNCLAIMED CHECK 940355 91.03$ 10/1/2020 HELEN SHAHBAZIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 928641 16.07$ 3/26/2020 HENRI KHODABAKHSHIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 289805 1,050.00$ 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289805 1,350.00$ 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289805 900.00$ 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289805 2,250.00$ 5/1/2019 HOLWICK CONSTRUCTORS INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 930161 15.77$ 4/16/2020 HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM UNCLAIMED CHECK 930162 97.20$ 4/16/2020 HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM UNCLAIMED CHECK 930163 289.23$ 4/16/2020 HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM UNCLAIMED CHECK 936481 4,682.98$ 7/23/2020 HRAYR CHARCHYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 933260 46.33$ 6/4/2020 HUGO AMILCAR ESPINOZA LUNA UNCLAIMED CHECK 924351 103.96$ 1/16/2020 IRAIZ GOMEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 245616 4,500.00$ 7/8/2016 J.R. ABBOTT CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 127609 375.00$ 1/7/2020 JAMES H. SHERMAN, M.D., INC. UNCLAIMED CHECK 927845 101.89$ 3/5/2020 JAMES THEO HORN-SMITH UNCLAIMED CHECK 931184 83.23$ 4/23/2020 JANET MARTINEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 938140 60.80$ 8/20/2020 JASMINA MULALIC UNCLAIMED CHECK 924049 18.12$ 1/9/2020 JASON ERICSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 929891 55.31$ 4/9/2020 JASON HUGHES UNCLAIMED CHECK 929892 17.85$ 4/9/2020 JASON J LEWIS UNCLAIMED CHECK 925995 763.75$ 2/6/2020 JASON SANABRIA UNCLAIMED CHECK 129767 10.92$ 3/24/2020 JEREMY FRAZIER UNCLAIMED CHECK 187991 6,000.00$ 11/6/2013 JEROME JULIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 934349 817.00$ 6/25/2020 JERRY KING UNCLAIMED CHECK 290851 3,000.00$ 5/29/2019 JESUS MURO ; SWAIN SIGN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928295 22.65$ 3/17/2020 JIAHAO WANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 933524 60.87$ 6/11/2020 JOAN ASLAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 935493 119.47$ 7/16/2020 JOEL VILLANUEVA UNCLAIMED CHECK 279505 7,950.00$ 8/27/2018 JOHN ARMSTRONG CASH BOND DEPOSIT 933414 35.00$ 6/11/2020 JOHN BARTON UNCLAIMED CHECK 274061 3,900.00$ 4/25/2018 JOHN EPPERLY CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928075 43.96$ 3/10/2020 JOHN G COTREL UNCLAIMED CHECK 924917 2,368.00$ 1/21/2020 JOHN JAMES LYTLE UNCLAIMED CHECK 927847 167.89$ 3/5/2020 JOHN PAUL RICARDO UNCLAIMED CHECK 936741 74.18$ 7/30/2020 JOHN PHILLIPS UNCLAIMED CHECK 928643 25.01$ 3/26/2020 JONATHAN STEN LARSSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 938899 22.17$ 9/10/2020 JOSE HURTADO UNCLAIMED CHECK 942134 37.42$ 10/29/2020 JOSHUA SOBEL UNCLAIMED CHECK 927848 18.54$ 3/5/2020 JUEFEI LIU UNCLAIMED CHECK 943787 215.71$ 11/24/2020 JULIE DE BEAUREPAIRE UNCLAIMED CHECK 287506 9,900.00$ 3/31/2019 JUST SIGN IT SERVICES CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938442 605.67$ 8/27/2020 JUSTIN TANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 935054 376.05$ 7/2/2020 JUSTIN THOMAS CONROY UNCLAIMED CHECK 924355 57.28$ 1/16/2020 JUWON LEE UNCLAIMED CHECK 936488 28.98$ 7/23/2020 KAI SCHULZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 938667 61.22$ 9/3/2020 KAREN DALLAKYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 282864 626.00$ 11/14/2018 KATHERINE MARTIN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924050 25.49$ 1/9/2020 KATHY F DOLAR UNCLAIMED CHECK 925723 128.80$ 1/30/2020 KENDRA SWINTON UNCLAIMED CHECK 133438 12.88$ 8/27/2020 KEVIN DIZON UNCLAIMED CHECK 924051 223.48$ 1/9/2020 KEVIN NUSSER UNCLAIMED CHECK 132501 62.79$ 7/17/2020 KEVIN STOCKTON UNCLAIMED CHECK 290441 626.00$ 5/16/2019 KHACHIK GRIGORIAN; GORIAN DEVELOPMENT CASH BOND DEPOSIT 935275 60.98$ 7/9/2020 KHALID MOHSIN A MANSORY UNCLAIMED CHECK 933263 62.39$ 6/4/2020 KIANA N FATEMI UNCLAIMED CHECK 931598 49.58$ 5/7/2020 LENA N FRIX UNCLAIMED CHECK 926003 178.10$ 2/6/2020 LEONID KRASNOV UNCLAIMED CHECK 926004 23.04$ 2/6/2020 LIAM VERNER WYNESS UNCLAIMED CHECK 938147 160.35$ 8/20/2020 LIDA GHARIBIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 938443 109.26$ 8/27/2020 LILAWATIE GUPTAR UNCLAIMED CHECK 933424 30.00$ 6/11/2020 LILIA RODRIGUEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 939315 102.62$ 9/24/2020 LINZHOU DAI UNCLAIMED CHECK 944092 2,000.00$ 12/10/2020 LLJ OFFICE VENTURES 6, LLC.; OPPERATING ACCOUNT UNCLAIMED CHECK 25 of 141

HLR MEDIA, LLC LEGAL QUOTES
626-301-1010
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
942379 611.90$ 11/5/2020 LOLLI AND POPS UNCLAIMED CHECK 942554 243.75$ 11/12/2020 LOUIS-MARIE AKIKI UNCLAIMED CHECK 942829 18.42$ 11/19/2020 LUCIA CANALES UNCLAIMED CHECK 941523 1,174.00$ 10/22/2020 LUSIK VARAKIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 287814 7,500.00$ 3/31/2019 LUSINE GRIGORYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 286582 7,000.00$ 2/15/2019 LUSINE KHACHERYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940895 111.35$ 10/15/2020 MALCOM BAUM UNCLAIMED CHECK 128288 183.00$ 1/30/2020 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP UNCLAIMED CHECK 129863 18.30$ 3/30/2020 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP UNCLAIMED CHECK 130625 293.45$ 4/28/2020 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP UNCLAIMED CHECK 931190 57.69$ 4/23/2020 MANIAH LANITA WILLIAMS UNCLAIMED CHECK 287560 6,200.00$ 3/31/2019 MANN CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 942555 29.87$ 11/12/2020 MANOEL FARHAD UNCLAIMED CHECK 128597 79.78$ 2/12/2020 MANUEL FERNANDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 924364 19.31$ 1/16/2020 MARCO V ANDREINI UNCLAIMED CHECK 286522 2,200.00$ 2/14/2019 MARIA QUINONEZ M. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928537 1,104.17$ 3/26/2020 MARILYN WARREN; SAC WIRELESS LLC. UNCLAIMED CHECK 927710 155.51$ 3/3/2020 MARINA PEREDA AGUIRRE UNCLAIMED CHECK 277922 2,200.00$ 7/20/2018 MARINA ZAKARIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287014 4,846.50$ 3/1/2019 MARKET CONTRACTORS LTD CASH BOND DEPOSIT 925725 46.00$ 1/30/2020 MARLON RICARDO ALLEN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924369 56.42$ 1/16/2020 MESROP VARTANIANS UNCLAIMED CHECK 936492 278.19$ 7/23/2020 METEAB ABDULLAH A ALAJLAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 132899 196.07$ 8/4/2020 MICHAEL KARLIS UNCLAIMED CHECK 133289 438.58$ 8/21/2020 MICHAEL KARLIS UNCLAIMED CHECK 131172 580.00$ 5/21/2020 MICHAEL PARKS UNCLAIMED CHECK 924058 188.77$ 1/9/2020 MICHAEL WERNER DE WIT UNCLAIMED CHECK 924059 215.49$ 1/9/2020 MICHAEL WERNER DE WIT UNCLAIMED CHECK 924060 241.99$ 1/9/2020 MICHAEL WERNER DE WIT UNCLAIMED CHECK 289754 3,000.00$ 4/30/2019 MIKE MOURADIAN ; NARINE MOURADIAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940898 16.06$ 10/15/2020 MINGYU DU UNCLAIMED CHECK 944585 79.10$ 12/22/2020 MIRAN YAMAMOTO UNCLAIMED CHECK 935059 44.14$ 7/2/2020 MISAEL GARCIA UNCLAIMED CHECK 931523 223.26$ 5/7/2020 MOHAMED NASER AL SALMAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 944153 35.71$ 12/10/2020 MOHAMMADEBRAHIM NIYAZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 283152 2,100.00$ 11/21/2018 MONTROSE CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 928089 32.44$ 3/10/2020 MOSES HERNANDEZ UNCLAIMED CHECK 928655 57.56$ 3/26/2020 NAZELI ABASYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 943970 133.09$ 12/3/2020 NIKITA ZALEVSKIY UNCLAIMED CHECK 936495 28.14$ 7/23/2020 NINA MKRTCHYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924062 55.24$ 1/9/2020 NORA HAMBARCHIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 291722 2,400.00$ 6/19/2019 NOVUS DESIGN INTERNATIONAL CASH BOND DEPOSIT 277351 450.00$ 7/9/2018 OHANIAN BUILDING CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938149 144.26$ 8/20/2020 OLA AHMED MOSTAFA AHMED ABDULLA UNCLAIMED CHECK 282444 24,000.00$ 11/5/2018 ONNI 700 BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291697 4,500.00$ 6/19/2019 ONNI 700 BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 286715 18,000.00$ 2/21/2019 ONNI BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287900 6,000.00$ 3/31/2019 ONNI BRAND LP CASH BOND DEPOSIT 278535 7,050.00$ 8/2/2018 OSCAR VERDUGO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287067 8,550.00$ 3/1/2019 OSCAR X VERDUGO CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940672 500.00$ 10/8/2020 PAACHI CHOCOLATES & BASKETS INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 937181 54.95$ 8/13/2020 PABLO BARRERA VARGAS UNCLAIMED CHECK 924181 94.83$ 1/14/2020 PACIFICA GLENDALE APARTMENTS, LLC UNCLAIMED CHECK 939101 43.98$ 9/17/2020 PAULA MURO UNCLAIMED CHECK 925095 3,204.00$ 1/21/2020 PAULINE BURKE UNCLAIMED CHECK 291368 30,000.00$ 6/10/2019 PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 291368 15,000.00$ 6/10/2019 PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 924512 80.27$ 1/21/2020 PLANET HOSPICE CARE INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 288497 600.00$ 4/1/2019 PLANETWORKS, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 23221 647.00$ 12/12/2018 POVAC INVESTMENTS INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287669 13,800.00$ 3/31/2019 PR CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 23213 647.00$ 11/15/2018 R.D. OLSON CONSTRUCTION CASH BOND DEPOSIT 281166 14,250.00$ 10/4/2018 R.L. CLOTWORTHY CONSTRUCTION, INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 278678 4,620.00$ 8/7/2018 R/J BUILDERS, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 26 of 141

HLR MEDIA, LLC LEGAL QUOTES
626-301-1010
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
PROOF
241283 2,000.00$ 4/4/2016 TIGRAN ARUTYUNYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 282015 5,250.00$ 10/25/2018 TIMBERWOLFF CONSTRUCTION, INC. CASH BOND DEPOSIT 282290 3,000.00$ 11/1/2018 TIMOTHY HEIDECKER CASH BOND DEPOSIT 927722 1,363.79$ 3/3/2020 TOPMAR INC UNCLAIMED CHECK
944371 23.83$ 12/17/2020 TORII FORSBERG UNCLAIMED CHECK 133117 45.00$ 8/13/2020 TYLER RICHARDSON UNCLAIMED CHECK 935667 947.24$ 7/23/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 940826 50.00$ 10/15/2020 VAZRIK YOSEFIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 931202 24.54$ 4/23/2020 VEICI Y BORJAS UNCLAIMED CHECK 929918 72.71$ 4/9/2020 VERJIN AFSHARIAN VAMEGRDIHIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 935509 383.19$ 7/16/2020 VERZHIN TOVMASSIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 935510 103.58$ 7/16/2020 VICTOR GERARD KALIL UNCLAIMED CHECK 945494 218.43$ 12/29/2020 VIGEN YEROMIAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 933991 32.92$ 6/25/2020 VIKTORIIA KARELINA UNCLAIMED CHECK 280765 3,200.00$ 9/26/2018 WALTER BAGRAMYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 135842 38.76$ 12/14/2020 WALTER C. GLASS UNCLAIMED CHECK 282885 626.00$ 11/15/2018 WALTER SALINAS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 287950 626.00$ 3/31/2019 WALTER SALINAS ; INFRASTRUCTURE CONTRACTOR CASH BOND DEPOSIT 931418 101.88$ 4/30/2020 WEN-I HU UNCLAIMED CHECK
282520 7,500.00$ 11/6/2018 WIN & KIN LLC DBA; BEABEA'S CASH BOND DEPOSIT 939044 605.00$ 9/17/2020 WISE CHOICE PLUMBING AND ROOTER INC UNCLAIMED CHECK 939045 605.00$ 9/17/2020 WISEMAN CONSTRUCTION PROS,INC. UNCLAIMED CHECK 283252 18,900.00$ 11/26/2018 WRIGHT BROTHERS CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938672 92.13$ 9/3/2020 XIAOTIAN HOU UNCLAIMED CHECK 926024 52.89$ 2/6/2020 XIAOYU YAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 942836 77.66$ 11/19/2020 XICHENG WANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 285763 626.00$ 2/1/2019 YANNIS BAYS ; SBCMD INC CASH BOND DEPOSIT 940645 141.21$ 10/8/2020 YINGHAO ZHAO UNCLAIMED CHECK 290778 1,500.00$ 5/28/2019 YOUN S KIM ; YOUNG KI KIM CASH BOND DEPOSIT 936509 322.59$ 7/23/2020 YOUNGTAE AHN UNCLAIMED CHECK 924523 83.45$ 1/21/2020 YUE JIANG UNCLAIMED CHECK 931420 65.47$ 4/30/2020 YUFEI CHEN UNCLAIMED CHECK 934747 994.00$ 6/25/2020 YUN S SCOTT UNCLAIMED CHECK 931206 149.84$ 4/23/2020 ZANAZAN GYOZALYAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 288682 3,400.00$ 4/5/2019 ZHANNA SHAHUMYAN CASH BOND DEPOSIT 938911 121.95$ 9/10/2020 ZIHAN FAN UNCLAIMED CHECK 928678 131.27$ 3/26/2020 ZIJING SU UNCLAIMED CHECK Publish: August 15 & August 22, 2024

GLENDALE INDEPENDENT
Inches 56.49
1 x Run= $847.35
2 x Run= $1694.47
Total Cost $1694.47
27 of 141

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award of Construction Contract for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project
1) Motion awarding a construction contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. in the amount of $8,262,128, approving a 15 percent contract contingency in the amount of $1,239,319, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the contract.
2) Resolution of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $9,864,553 for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for October 1, 2024 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project will improve mobility and enhance safety in the Downtown Glendale area. On August 7, 2024, two bids were received for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project, and after a thorough review, staff found Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc.’s, bid to be a responsive bid from a responsible bidder.

The intent of this item is for the City Council to award a construction contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. that will cost $8,262,128 with a 15% contingency of $1,239,319, totaling $9,501,447. Additionally, a resolution of appropriation is needed to appropriate funds from the Measure R Regional Return and Gas Tax Funds to fund this project.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing a construction contract with Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project in the amount of $8,262,128 plus a 15 percent contract contingency of $1,239,319 and approve the resolution of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $9,864,553 from the Measure R Regional Return and State Gas Tax Funds for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project.
28 of 141

24c
5 4
5 9

ANALYSIS
Downtown Glendale is a bustling district located in the heart of the fourth largest city in Los Angeles County. The area boasts a plethora of shopping, dining, and entertainment options, as well as small and large business headquarters. However, the high volume of traffic and tightly spaced signalized corridors present safety and mobility concerns. To address these issues, the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project aims to enhance pedestrian safety, improve mobility, and address traffic concerns. The street segments within the district are classified as principal and minor arterials, as well as collector and local roadways on the California Road System (CRS).

As one of the major districts in Glendale, Downtown Glendale serves as a crucial connection point for travelers accessing different parts of the city.

Project Scope of Work
The project scope of work includes the installation of new fiber optic infrastructure, Accessible Pedestrian Systems (APS) push buttons, improved bicycle and vehicle detection camera systems, new LED safety lights, and other various critical signal hardware upgrades throughout Downtown Glendale.

On July 9, 2024, the City Council adopted the project plans and specification and authorized the city clerk to advertise the project for bids. The project was advertised in the Glendale Independent, the city’s website, as well as various online platforms.

On August 7, 2024, the city received two bids from contractors as follows:

1. Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc $8,262,128

2. DBX, Inc. $16,290,774
Upon review of the bid documents, staff finds the bid of Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. of $8,262,128 to be the lowest responsive bid from a responsible bidder. The bid of Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. in the amount of $8,262,128 is approximately 3% below the Engineer’s Estimate of $8,500,000.

In addition, staff recommends a reserve for contingencies in the amount of $1,239,319 or 15 percent of the bid amount. The contingency is based on previous experience with similar projects and is routine for projects of this scale and complexity. This will also allow staff to account for any incidental work, unforeseen field conditions that could be encountered during construction, underground utilities issues that could arise because of the nature of the project, and any resulting field modifications that may be necessary.

Furthermore, staff has budgeted approximately five percent of the construction amount, or $ 413,106 for construction management and engineering support services such as project management, project engineering, construction inspection, quality assurance, quality control, and materials testing.
29 of 141

34c
5 4
5 9
Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project Construction Bid $ 8,262,128
15% Contract Contingency $ 1,239,319
5% Construction Management & Engineering Support $ 413,106 Total Construction Cost $ 9,914,553
The State of California Contractor’s State License Board website confirms that the license of Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc is current, active, and in good standing.

Additionally, Staff contacted the references provided by Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc and found they had satisfactorily completed their projects.

The construction of this project is anticipated to begin in December 2024 and is scheduled for completion by December 2025.

Measure R Project Funding
Measure R is a half-cent sales tax for Los Angeles County that finances new transportation projects and programs. In November 2008, Measure R was approved by two-thirds majority, committing a projected $40 billion to traffic relief and transportation upgrades throughout the county over its 30-year life span. The city’s share of Measure R funds for Highway Operational Improvements is approximately $98.5 million dollars.

The project funding is currently approved by the Metro Board in the amount of $8,626,736. The project meets Metro’s guideline to utilize Measure R funds in full.

Therefore, to complete the project using these funds, additional Measure R funds will be requested from Metro and upon approval can be appropriated and utilized by the city on this project. Staff have confirmed with Metro that the project can utilize additional Measure R funding to cover the entire project costs and these additional fundings will be considered for approval at the Metro Regular Board Meetings in January 2025.

Project Funding Requests:

Metro Board approved Funding Agreement MR310.62 $ 2,500,000 Metro Board Approved Amendment No. 1 to MR310.62 $ 4,126,736 Metro Board Approved Amendment No. 2 to MR310.62 $ 2,000,000 Additional Funding Request to Metro Board for January 2025 $ 2,000,000 Total Funding Request $10,626,736
To avoid delays in the construction, State Gas Tax funds will supplement the needed Measure R funds at the time of the construction contract award. When the additional Measure R funding becomes available, staff will present a resolution of appropriation to the City Council to allocate those funds for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project and replenish the Gas Tax Fund balance.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
These improvements will help modernize the infrastructure of Downtown Glendale, 30 of 141

44c
5 4
5 9
enhancing safety and accessibility for all modes of travel. The fiber optic infrastructure will enable faster and more reliable communication between traffic signals and the Traffic Management Center (TMC), while the APS will provide audio and visual signals to assist individuals with visual impairments in crossing the street safely. The upgraded detection camera systems will detect all modes of travel and safely initiate the right-of-way assignments through signal operations. Meanwhile, the LED safety lights will improve visibility at night, reducing the risk of accidents and promoting a safer streetscape.

Overall, these improvements will make Downtown Glendale a more connected, accessible, and secure place to live, work, and visit.

Outreach for this project will be made through a dedicated website. The website introduces the public to the project and the project team, explains the scope of work and project locations, highlights the project phase, and provides the public with staff contact information for questions, discussions, and/or input.

FISCAL IMPACT
The construction of the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project will cost $9,914,553, a portion of which was not included in the FY 2024-25 approved budget. The current Metro Board-approved funding of $8,626,736 includes a partial appropriation of $833,334 in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget. Therefore, an additional appropriation of $7,793,402 from the currently approved Measure R Regional Return funds is being requested in this report. Additionally, staff is requesting an appropriation from the State Gas Tax Fund to cover the project's financial needs while the additional Measure R Regional Return funding is being approved by Metro. The existing appropriations and requested appropriations are outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 50,000 GL: 52100-2550-PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00679AG
Measure R Regional
Return Fund
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $ 7,793,402 GL: 34301-2550-PWD-
0020-P0000
PL: PWD00679AG
GL: 52100-2550-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00679AG
Measure R Regional
Return Fund
$ 2,071,151 GL: 24219-4020-PWD-
0000-P0000
GL: 52100-4020-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD00679BN
State Gas Tax Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Project is categorically exempt from environment review because of CEQA Guidelines §§15301.
31 of 141

54c
5 4
5 9

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not approve the motion authorizing a construction contract and resolution of appropriation for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project. Doing so, however, will not improve mobility and enhance safety in Downtown Glendale area.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Interim Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Marc David, Senior Project Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Project Location Map
32 of 141

4c
MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded.
by Council Member , that the Council of the City of
Glendale hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute a construction contract – subject to approval by the City Attorney – with Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc, for the Downtown Glendale Signal and Mobility Improvements Project, Specification No. 3939, for the amount of $8,262,128.

2. Authorizes a 15 percent reserve for contingency, equal to $1,239,319.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
33 of 141

34 of 141

35 of 141

GALLER PL

E GLENOAKS BLVD

E DRYDEN ST
FOX PL

BALBOA N CAMPBELL ST

N ISABEL ST

N HOWARD ST

N LOUISE ST

N CENTRAL AV

SHERMAN LN

E FAIRVIEW AV

N COLUMBUS AV

W DRYDEN ST

N BELMONT ST

N ADAMS ST
McHENRY RD

PIEDMONT AV

NARANJAI DRNARANJAI DR

E DORAN ST

E HARVARD ST

E BROADWAY

E WILSON AV

E CALIFORNIA AV
E. LEXINGTON DR

N ADAMS STS ADAMS ST

FRANKLIN CT

S EVERETT ST N EVERETT ST

S BELMONT ST N BELMONT ST

S CEDAR ST N CEDAR ST

S GLENDALE AV

BALBOA AV

N GENEVA ST
N EVERETT ST N. EVERETT ST

GLENVIA ST

E DORAN ST

N GENEVA ST

N HOWARD ST

S ISABEL ST

N ISABEL ST

JACKSON ST N JACKSON ST

KENWOOD ST

LOUISE ST

E LEXINGTON DR

E WILSON AV

ORANGE ST

CENTRAL AV COLUMBUS AV

MYRTLE ST

W MILFORD ST

ORANGE ST

W DORAN ST

CENTRAL AVE

HAWTHORNE ST

COLUMBUS AVE

MAURITA PL

N CHEVY CHASE DR

STANLEY AV

ETHEL ST

CORTEZ DR

VISCANO DRROSSMOYNE AV

CORDOVA AV

N CEDAR ST

N EVERETT ST

N HOWARD ST

N JACKSON ST

N ISABEL ST

N ADAMS ST

PORTOLA AV

CORDOVA AV

CORONADO DR

MONTEREY RD

N GLENDALE AV

CABRILLO DR

MONTEREY RD

JACKSON PL

GOODE AV

SANCHEZ DR MARYLAND PL

N CENTRAL AV

MELROSE AV

W FAIRVIEW AV

CAMERON

SAN RAFAEL AV

GLENOAKS BLVD

MARYLAND AVE
PL
AV
ORANGE

GROVE AVE

ARDEN AVE

BURCHETT ST

ORANGE ST
ALLEY 238 ALLEY 239
ALLEY 240

W MILFORD ST
ALLEY

BRAND BLVD

BROADWAY

BRAND BLVD

HARVARD ST

CENTRAL AV

GLENDALE

GALLERIA
CA-134 FWY

LOUISE ST

COLUMBUS AVE

E CALIFORNIA AV

GLENOAKS BLVD

BRAND BLVD
CA-134 (VENTURA FWY)

S GLENDALE AV

DOWNTOWN GLENDALE SIGNAL & MOBILITY

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

NOT TO SCALE

PROJECT LOCATION
LEGEND
EHHIBIT 1: PROJECT LOCATION MAP
(Not to Scale)
36 of 141

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Request for Proposals for Official Police Tow Services

1. Resolution Adopting the Police Department’s Request for Proposals for Towing and Storage Services and Authorizing the City Clerk to Advertise for Proposals.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for October 1, 2024 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendale contracts with independent tow companies to provide tow and storage services as directed by the Police Department. In 2015, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for tow and storage services and on August 1, 2016, entered into contracts with three tow companies. The contracts were for five years with an option for two, two-year extensions. The current contracts expire on July 31, 2025.

In anticipation of the expiration of those contracts, on July 16, 2024, the Police Department brought an RFP for Official Police Tow Services (OPTS) to Council for approval. Council approved the issuance of the RFP; however, the municipal code requires approval of the OPTS RFP by way of a resolution instead of a motion. This matter is being brought back for approval of a resolution authorizing the release and advertising of the OPTS RFP.
37 of 141

24d
5 5
4 3

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Request for Proposals for Official Police Tow Services and direct the City Clerk to advertise for proposals.

ANALYSIS
On July 16, 2024, the Glendale Police Department presented its proposed Request for Proposals Official Police Tow Services to the City Council. After a discussion with staff, City Council moved to accept the RFP and authorized the Police Chief to advertise for proposals. The Police Department sent notice of the RFP to the current vendors, to all tow companies with Glendale business addresses and posted it on the Department website.

Staff recently discovered that Glendale Municipal Code section 10.55.060 B requires an RFP for OPTS to be adopted by resolution, with the City Clerk being directed to advertise for proposals in a local newspaper of general circulation. In order to comply with the notice requirements, the Police Department has suspended the current process so that the resolution and noticing requirements can be satisfied.

The process will cause the estimated date for completion of the OPTS RFP process to be extended by approximately 45 days (until February 2025). The current tow contracts do not expire until July 31, 2025.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The tow operators who submitted proposals have been advised.

FISCAL IMPACT
The tow services to be performed under the tow contracts is not anticipated to have a significant financial impact. However, the Police Department expends a substantial amount of valuable time and multiple resources facilitating and regulating tow services in the City. This includes time at the scene of the incident, report writing and processing, release process time, complaint mitigations, and tow hearings and appeals.

The City currently collects a Vehicle Towing Administrative Cost Recovery (VTACR) fee per vehicle in the amount of $300 from each contractor as allowed under GMC

10.55.090.

During calendar year 2023, the Police Department towed 1851 vehicles subject to the VTACR fee. The amount collected in any fiscal year will continue to be dependent upon the number of vehicles released to vehicle owners.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This activity involves the ongoing use of existing City streets for purposes of towing vehicles under the City’s police powers and is therefore exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines section 15301.
38 of 141

34d
5 5
4 3

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Not adopt the proposed Resolution.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Manuel Cid, Police Chief
Prepared by:

Ann M. Maurer, Chief Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Request for Proposal
39 of 141

1 RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

APPROVING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

TOWING AND STORAGE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO

ADVERTISE FOR PROPOSALS
WHEREAS, the Request for Proposals for Official Police Tow Services ("RFP") as presented to Council on July 16, 2024 and October 1, 2024, contains: 1) performance requirements and standards, including eligibility, facility location, equipment, maximum rates and services; and 2) criteria for evaluating proposals and the process for selecting the most qualified proposers; and WHEREAS, the RFP covers only towing and storing situations, such as those: 1) ordered or request by the City's Police Department officers and employees who are duly authorized by law to remove, impound or store motor vehicles; and 2} done without the vehicle owner's or operator's knowledge, consent or authorization, regardless of whether the vehicle is on public or private property. This situation generally occurs when an owner or operator is arrested, detained, incapacitated or physically unable to drive the vehicle; or when an owner or operator fails to designate or express a preference for a particular towing company.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA THAT:

SECTION 1. The Council finds, determines and declares that:

1. Motor vehicles that are damaged, inoperative, abandoned, stole, recovered, illegally parked, evidence of a crime or left by persons arrested and that remain on the city's streets, right-of-ways or property:

A. Restrict the free flow of traffic along the street and create a traffic hazard; B. Impede, hinder, obstruct or delay the city's emergency service providers (including Police, Fire, and Paramedics) or the city's essential services providers (including Integrated Waste Management, and Glendale Water and Power) from not only expeditiously and safely traveling to their intended destination, but also performing their vital functions; and C. Constitute a safety hazard, a public nuisance or at times, a public emergency, on congested city streets, thereby impacting or effecting the property, public safety and welfare of the city's residents and visitors alike.

2. When these vehicles- whether damaged, inoperative, abandoned, stolen, recovered, illegally parked, evidence of a crime, or left by persons arrested- remain on the city's streets, right-of-ways or property, or when they impede or block vehicular 40 of 141

2 traffic, the city, through its Police Department, is obligated to make arrangements for the vehicle's removal from the road and to place it in safe-keeping in a secure storage lot.

3. Because the city does not provide or perform its own vehicle towing or storage services, the city needs the services of one or more privately-owned towing companies to assist the Police Department in carrying out its obligation to:

A. Effectively enforce parking and traffic laws;
B. Promptly tow vehicles that are inoperative, involved in a collision or recovered after having been stolen; and
C. Expeditiously remove and safely store vehicles that are impounded or held for investigation, examination or evidence.

4. The criteria, requirements and standards in the RFP:

A. Are designed only to procure non-consensual towing and storage services that the Police Department itself needs;
B. Are not intended to regulate, or otherwise effect, the relationship between towing companies and the general public;
C. Ensure that the Police Department carries out its duties and responsibilities of providing public assistance;
D. Set minimum performance standards to ensure quality service for the Police Department;
E. Provide the Police Department with dependable, safe, expeditious towing and secure storage;
F. Contribute to the efficient administration of the Police Department's towing obligations; and
G. Create a fair and an impartial means for evaluating and selecting Official Police Tow Services.

5. The RFP's requirement that an Official Police Tow Service provider must locate its vehicle storage lot, business office and tow truck facility within Glendale, or within one half mile (½) mile outside of the city's limits, among other things, fairly balances the city's interest and need to:
41 of 141

3 A. Minimize the impact upon:

(1) Police operations- by reducing the out-of-jurisdiction time that officers, detectives, crime scene investigators or lab technicians spend driving to a distant storage lot for vehicle inspection and other purposes, and consequently, lessening police presence within Glendale and adversely affecting police response time within the community; and
(2) Vehicle owners- by ensuring that owners, whose towed and stored vehicle may be their sole means of getting to work or around, do not experience the hardship of having to travel to distant storage yards outside of the city to retrieve their vehicle, and accordingly, safely retrieving their vehicle in a shorter time period.

B. Encourage competition for the Police Department's tow contracts by allowing towing firms located outside of Glendale to submit a Proposal.

6. The one-half mile (½) mile distance outside of the city's limits minimizes the impact upon police operations while at the same time affording towing companies, who are interested in submitting a Proposal, a broad expansion of potential Official Police Tow Service facility sites surrounding the city's 36 mile border.

SECTION 2. The Request for Proposals for Official Police Tow Services as presented to City Council on July 16, 2024 and October 1, 2024, its specifications, and the various documents incorporated in it, to provide towing, storage, and other services for the Police Department, are approved and adopted.

SECTION 3. By this Resolution, the City Clerk shall advertise for proposals.

SECTION 4. In accordance with the RFP's selection procedures, the Chief of Police shall prepare a report to the City Manager with recommendations regarding the most qualified Proposers. The City Manager shall forward the report to the Council for its deliberation and its decision on awarding the Official Police Tow Services contracts.

SECTION 5. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its adoption.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2024. _________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
42 of 141

4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ________________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _______ day of ____________________, 2024, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
43 of 141

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR

OFFICIAL POLICE TOW SERVICES
City of Glendale
Police Department
Issuance Date:

October 3, 2024
44 of 141

CITY OF GLENDALE

POLICE DEPARTMENT

REQUEST FOR

PROPOSALS FOR

OFFICIAL POLICE TOW SERVICES
October 3, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SCHEDULE 1

2. INTRODUCTION 2
Description of Districts 3
Map of Districts 4

3. BACKGROUND 5

4. SCOPE OF SERVICES; GENERAL DUTIES 6

4.1 Towing and Storage 6

4.2 OPTS Provider’s Compensation; City’s VTACR Fee 7

4.3 Facilities 8

4.4 Operating Equipment 10

4.5 Trained Personnel 12

5. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 13

5.1 Evidence of Financial Responsibility 13

5.2 Compliance with Laws; Subletting; Ownership in other Businesses 13

5.3 Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance 14

5.4 Workers’ Compensation Insurance 19

5.5 OPTS Provider’s Failure to Obtain, Pay for, or Maintain Insurance 20

5.6 Indemnification 21

5.7 Independent Contractor Status 25

6. INTERPRETATION OR CORRECTION OF RFP 26

7. ADDENDA 26

8. USING THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL FORMS 27

9. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS 30

9.1 Submittals 30

9.2 Proposal Deadline 30
45 of 141

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)

10. DISPOSITION OF PROPOSALS 30

11. COMMUNICATION WITH, AND GIFT OR GRATUITIES TO, THE CITY AND OTHERS PROHIBITED 31

12. WITHDRAWAL, CANCELLATION, OR MODIFICATION OF A PROPOSAL 32

13. OPENING OF PROPOSALS 33

14. INITIAL REVIEW OF PROPOSALS; SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA 33

14.1 Overview 33

14.2 Responsive Proposal 34

14.3 Responsible Proposer 34

15. AWARD OF CONTRACT 39

16. CITY’S RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 40

17. LETTER OF OBJECTION; PROCEDURES 41

18. HOLIDAY, WEEKEND, CITY CLOSED - EXTENSION TO NEXT BUSINESS DAY 41

19. CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 41
EXHIBIT A: DRAFT VEHICLE TOWING AND STORAGE AGREEMENT EX-A:1-91 EXHIBIT B: SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE CITY EX-B:1-5 OF GLENDALE’S OFFICIAL POLICE TOW SERVICES
EXHIBIT C: CHAPTER 10.55 OF GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE EX-C:1-8

OFFICIAL POLICE TOW SERVICES
EXHIBIT D: CITYWIDE FEE SCHEDULE – VTACR FEE EX-D:1 EXHIBIT E: DISTRICT MAP EX-F:1
PROPOSAL FORM PF:1-46
46 of 141

1 CITY OF GLENDALE

POLICE DEPARTMENT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR

OFFICIAL POLICE TOW SERVICES
July 31, 2024

1. SCHEDULE

1.1 Below is the anticipated schedule for selecting Proposers and awarding contracts:

Proposal Phase Date
City issues and advertises Request for Proposals October 3, 2024 Deadline for submitting written questions,
requests for clarification, or letter of objection October 17, 2024 Pre-proposal meeting October 24, 2024
Deadline for submitting Proposals October 31, 2024
Opening of Proposals November 4, 2024
Site inspections November 18-20, 2024
Oral interviews December 2-5, 2024
Staff report containing
recommendation to the Chief of Police December 12, 2024 Chief of Police’s report containing
recommendation December 19, 2024
City Council selects successful Proposer(s) January 14, 2025 Police Department mails Notice of Intent
to Award OPTS Contract January 16, 2025
Deadline for delivering to City
signed contract and insurance February 21, 2025
Contract effective date August 1, 2025
47 of 141

2 1.2 A representative from the City of Glendale’s Police Department will hold a pre- proposal meeting on October 24, 2024 from 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. at:

Glendale Police Department Community
Room
l31 North Isabel Street Glendale, CA 91206

1.3 The pre-proposal meeting’s purpose is to answer prospective Proposer’s questions and to provide any additional information about the scope of the work, the Request for Proposals, and the Contract. The Police Department encourages all towing firms interested in submitting a Proposal to attend this meeting.

1.4 All questions and answers will be documented and later mailed, at the earliest possible date, to all Proposers attending the conference and any other known, prospective Proposers.

Questions that cannot be answered during the conference will be included in the mailing.

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 On behalf of its Police Department, the City of Glendale (“the City”) is inviting written Proposals from qualified, private contractors, who have a minimum of three (3) years of actual operating experience as municipal tow providers, to provide vehicle towing and storage operations as ordered or requested by City’s Police Department or other employees who are authorized by law to remove, impound, or store vehicles, to be known as Official Police Tow Services (“OPTS”).

2.2 The City of Glendale requires well-managed and financially sound firms with demonstrated experience and technical ability; qualified and trained personnel; secure and well-maintained facilities; updated and reliable equipment; and high levels of customer service and satisfaction to fulfill the requirements outlined in this Request for Proposals (“RFP”).

2.3 The City is seeking three (3) firms to operate independently within three (3) areas of the City.

These areas, or “Districts,” which are depicted in the map entitled, “District Map of the Official Police Tow Services of the City of Glendale” attached hereto as Exhibit “E” and set forth on page 5 below.

DISTRICT 1
All of the area consisting of: Northerly boundary:

Verdugo Motorway (fire road); to Southerly
boundary:

The city limit bordering the city of Los Angeles; to Easterly boundary:

The centerline of Brand Boulevard, and as if it were extended northerly to Verdugo Motorway; to 48 of 141

3 Westerly boundary:

The city limit bordering the city of Burbank.

DISTRICT 2
All of the area consisting of: Northerly
boundary:

The centerline of: Los Flores Motorway (fire road), Sunshine Drive, Colina Drive, and as if Colina Drive were extended easterly to the Verdugo Wash, and southerly along the Verdugo Wash to Mountain Avenue, and as if Mountain Avenue were extended easterly to the city limit bordering the city of Pasadena; to
Southerly boundary:

The city limit bordering the city of Los Angeles; to Easterly boundary:

The city limit bordering the cities of Los Angeles and Pasadena; to Westerly boundary:

The centerline of Brand Boulevard.

DISTRICT 3
All of the area consisting of: Northerly
boundary:

The city limit at Deukmejian Wilderness Park, and the city limit bordering Angeles National Forest; to
Southerly boundary:

The centerline of: Verdugo Motorway (fire road) to Los Flores Motorway (fire road), Sunshine Drive, Colina Drive, and as if Colina Drive were extended easterly to the Verdugo Wash, and southerly along the Verdugo Wash to Mountain Avenue, and as if Mountain Avenue were extended easterly to the city limit bordering the city of Pasadena; to
Easterly boundary:

The city limit at Deukmejian Wilderness Park, and the city limit bordering: Angeles National Forest, unincorporated La Crescenta, the cities of La Cañada- Flintridge and Pasadena; to Westerly boundary:

The city limit bordering the city of Los Angeles.
49 of 141

4 50 of 141

5 2.4 Because some Districts have unique characteristics or locations, a Proposer (also known as “OPTS Provider” in this RFP) should visit and examine the Districts before submitting a Proposal.

2.5 While the OPTS Provider provides its work, services, and operations (collectively, “services”) to the City, the City reserves the right to: enlarge, reduce, or otherwise change a District’s boundaries; or increase or decrease the number of Districts; or both.

2.6 Although a Proposer may submit a Proposal for more than one District, THE CITY WILL AWARD ONLY ONE (1) TOWING DISTRICT TO ANY
SUCCESSFUL PROPOSER. A Proposer who submits a Proposal for more than one District must mark the appropriate boxes on page PF:1 of the attached “Proposal Forms” (PF:1 to PF:46).

2.7Although this RFP provides an overview of the scope of services and the OPTS Provider’s duties, the proposed “Vehicle Towing and Storage Agreement” (“the Contract”) describes in detail the full terms, conditions, requirements, specifications, and minimum performance standards for an OPTS Provider.

The City has attached the proposed Contract as Exhibit “A” to this RFP. The City fully incorporates the Contract into this RFP and makes the Contract a part of the RFP. Therefore, before submitting a Proposal, the Proposer must read the proposed Contract. In addition, on page PF:1 of the accompanying Proposal Forms, a Proposer must certify that the Proposer has read, examined, and is fully familiar with not only the RFP, but also the Contract.

3. BACKGROUND

3.1 The City of Glendale is located six miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains. With a residential population of approximately 197,000, Glendale is the fourth largest city in Los Angeles County.

Glendale prides itself on being a diverse community with many cultures, which contribute to the high quality of life and fiscal stability. Encompassing 30.6 square miles, Glendale’s diverse business community includes retail, service, financial institutions, and the rapidly expanding entertainment industry. Two large regional shopping malls and numerous high-rise office buildings as well as commercial- residential mixed use buildings highlight the downtown area.

3.2 Glendale has 368.5 miles of paved roadway and 67.2 miles of arterial highway.

Four freeways traverse Glendale, two of which are interstate highways.

3.3 Glendale is a full-service city of more than 1,500 employees with 14 major departments, including its own utilities and services (electric, water, sewer, and integrated waste collection), Police, and Fire Departments. The City has a City 51 of 141

6 Manager form of government, with five elected Council members, in addition to an elected City Clerk and elected City Treasurer. The Council appoints various boards and commissions.

4. SCOPE OF SERVICES; GENERAL DUTIES

4.1Towing and Storage

4.1.1 The OPTS Provider’s primary duty will be responding, on a first priority basis, to requests for towing services initiated by the City’s police officers and parking enforcement personnel. The OPTS Provider must also respond to towing requests from other City employees who are duly authorized to remove vehicles for storage, or investigation, or both.

4.1.2 Typical towing situations will include but will not be limited to: removing illegally parked vehicles, towing inoperative vehicles as a result of traffic accidents and mechanical breakdowns, and impounding vehicles for investigation, evidence, or a violation of the law. The OPTS Provider must provide towing and storage services all hours of a day, every day of the year.

4.1.3 The OPTS Provider must maintain adequate personnel, equipment, and facilities at all times to perform the required towing services, within the time frame(s) outlined in the Contract.

4.1.4 While the OPTS Provider has custody of vehicles, the OPTS Provider will be responsible for their safekeeping, including their contents, until they have been released to the owner or owner’s agent, or disposed of in the manner the law permits.

4.1.5 Until the OPTS Provider receives the Police Department’s written authorization, the OPTS Provider must not allow access to anyone or release a vehicle to an owner or the owner’s agent when the Police Department is:
(A) Holding that vehicle for investigation, examination, or evidence, or requesting its special handling or protection (collectively, “police hold vehicles”); or
(B) Impounding that vehicle for unpaid parking citations, lack of current registration, or a violation of the law.

4.1.6 To prevent damage to police hold vehicles or spoliation of any evidence in or upon those vehicles, such as fingerprints or stains, the OPTS Provider must store police hold vehicles in a secure area protected against the elements, sources of contamination, and entry by unauthorized persons. 52 of 141

7 The OPTS Provider must make the secure storage area available for periods up to 72 hours.

4.1.7 The OPTS Provider’s rates, charges, and fees for towing, storing, or performing other services under the Contract must not exceed the rates, charges, and fees set forth in the “Schedule of Rates and Charges for the City of Glendale’s Official Police Tow Services,” which is attached as Exhibit “B” and is fully incorporated as part of this RFP.

4.2 OPTS Provider’s Compensation; City’s VTACR Fee

4.2.1 Except as the Contract or the law provides, an OPTS Provider will not receive any monetary compensation from the City for providing towing or storage services. The OPTS Provider’s compensation will come solely from its collecting towing and storage fees from the vehicle’s owner or the owner’s agent, as more fully described in the Contract. In place of compensation and in exchange for the Proposer’s services, the City will give the selected Proposer the special privilege and exclusive right of:
(A) Identifying itself as one of the City’s “Official Police Tow Services”.
(B) Operating within a designated District;
(C) Receiving the Police Department’s calls for service; and (D) Furnishing the public with non-consensual vehicle towing and storage services.

4.2.2 An OPTS Provider must pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each vehicle that the OPTS Provider tows. The fee, known as the Vehicle Towing Administrative Cost Recovery Fee, or “VTACR Fee,” covers the City’s actual and reasonable costs for running a towing program on the public’s behalf and for administering the OPTS Providers’ contracts. Glendale Municipal Code Chapter 10.55 (attached to this RFP as Exhibit “C”), page 97 of the Citywide Fee Schedule for FY 2024-25 (attached to this RFP as Exhibit “D”), more fully describe: the VTACR Fee’s payment, the payment due dates, the interest rate for a late or missed payment, record retention requirements for the VTACR Fee’s calculation and payment, audit provisions, and the penalty charge for an underpayment. The City fully incorporates these documents into this RFP and makes them a part of the RFP.
53 of 141

8 Before submitting a Proposal, the Proposer must read the proposed Contract, the Municipal Code, the Schedule of Rates and Charges for Official Police Tow Services last amended April 29, 2024 for more information about the VTACR Fee and its requirements.

Any questions or updates regarding the Citywide Fee Schedule may be directed to the Finance Department at (818) 548-2085.

The Citywide Fee Schedule is also available on the City’s website at:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/finance/revenue/citywid e-fee-schedule.

4.3 Facilities

4.3.1 At its expense, a Proposer must acquire and maintain the following facilities upon which the Proposer will operate its towing and storage business:

4.3.2 Primary Storage Lot and Business Office: An OPTS Provider must operate and maintain a primary storage lot and a business office on the same site.

The primary storage lot:
(A) Must accommodate:
(1)Police hold vehicles;
(2)Vehicles with an appraised value of four-thousand dollars ($4,000.00) or more; and
(3)A vehicle’s equipment, cargo, or contents with an appraised value of five-hundred dollars ($500.00) or more; and
(B) Must be at least five thousand (5,000) square feet of accessible and usable space for storing and releasing vehicles covered under the Contract.

4.3.3 Secondary Storage Lot: An OPTS Provider must operate and maintain a separate secondary storage lot which:
(A) Must accommodate:
(1)Vehicles with an appraised value of less than four-thousand dollars ($4,000.00); and
(2)A vehicle’s equipment, cargo, or contents with an
appraised value of less than five-hundred dollars
($500.00); and
(B) Must be at least five thousand (5,000) square feet of accessible and usable space for storing and releasing vehicles covered under 54 of 141

9 the Contract.

4.3.4 Instead of maintaining a separate 5,000 square foot primary storage lot and a separate 5,000 square foot secondary storage lot, the OPTS Provider may locate and operate the secondary lot on the same site as the primary lot, if:
(A) The primary lot that has ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more of accessible and usable space for storing and releasing vehicles; and
(B) The area set aside for the secondary lot conforms to the security requirements and other standards for a primary lot.

4.3.5 Disposal Lot: An OPTS Provider may operate and maintain a separate disposal lot for storing discarded and junked vehicles. Alternatively, an OPTS Provider may operate or maintain the disposal lot on the same site as the business office and primary storage lot, or the secondary storage lot.

4.3.6 The OPTS Provider must locate its business office, primary storage lot, secondary storage lot, and disposal lot within:
(A) The City of Glendale in an IND, IMU, or IMU-R zone. Exhibit “E” to this RFP is a map that shows Glendale’s IND, IMU, and IMU-R areas. This map is illustrative only. An official map is on file with the City’s Community Development Department,
Planning Division. Before purchasing or leasing a site to operate a business office, primary storage lot, secondary storage lot, or disposal lot, an OPTS Provider should verify with the Community Development Department whether: (1) the proposed site is within one of the three zones, and (2) a Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) is a prerequisite; or
(B) One half mile outside of the City of Glendale’s incorporated limits.

4.3.7 An OPTS Provider’s business office, storage lots, and disposal lot must:
(A) Completely meet the Contract’s facilities requirements and specifications; and
(B) Conform to the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code, Building & Safety Code, and Zoning Code when located within Glendale.

4.3.8 At its expense, an OPTS Provider must:
(A) Install landscaping and screening (e.g., decorative walls) at its storage and disposal lots, when located within Glendale; and 55 of 141

10 (B) Maintain its business office and storage lots in good repair; in a safe, sanitary, neat, and clean condition; and free of weeds, debris, and litter.

4.3.9 An OPTS Provider whose business office, primary or secondary storage lots, or disposal lot, is located in (or borders) a residential or other noise sensitive areas must ensure that its noise is controlled and is kept to a bare minimum, so that telephones, radios, amplified sound systems, tow trucks, vehicles, machinery, equipment, and facility operations:
(A) Are not unreasonably loud, disruptive, or a nuisance; and (B) Do not unreasonably interfere with the comfort, peace, quiet, or repose of the surrounding areas’ inhabitants or businesses.

4.3.10 When a Proposer submits its Proposal, if the Proposer does not have a business office and primary storage lot, or secondary storage lot, or both, as previously described in this RFP, the Proposer, if awarded the Contract, will have one-hundred-eighty (180) calendar days from the date that the Proposer signs and delivers the Contract, within which to obtain the facilities and begin operations there. The Proposer must submit proof, satisfactory to the City, of having obtained the required facilities.

4.3.11 A Proposer’s failure to obtain, and begin operations at, the business office and primary storage lot, or secondary storage lot, or both, within the one- hundred-eighty (180) day period will not only automatically disqualify the Proposer under this RFP, but also constitute a default and a material breach of the Contract. At its discretion, the City may then: reopen the proposal process; choose from among the remaining, if any, qualified proposers; reissue the RFP; negotiate directly with any firm for towing and storage services; or choose not to contract for services.

4.4 Operating Equipment

4.4.1 At its expense, a Proposer must have the following equipment that conforms to the California Highway Patrol’s Classification (“CHP Class”) for the gross vehicle weight rating (“GVWR”) of a truck chassis2:
2 GVWR (Lbs.) CHP Class
Minimum 14,000 A
Minimum 33,000 B
Minimum 52,000 C
Minimum 54,000 D
56 of 141

11 (A) A minimum of one (1) flatbed car carrier (Class A or Class B); plus
(B) A minimum of four (4) light-medium duty tow trucks, consisting of:
(1)At least One (1) Light Duty (Class A); plus
(2)At least One (1) Medium Duty (Class B); plus
(3)Two (2) additional tow trucks, whether (Class A), or (Class B), or both; plus
(C) At least one (1):
(1)Heavy Duty (Class C); or
(2)Super Heavy Duty (Class D); plus
(D) Two-way radio communication equipment in all of the above vehicles.

4.4.2The OPTS Provider’s tow trucks and flatbed car carrier (collectively, “tow units”) must meet the Contract’s equipment requirements and specifications.

4.4.3 The tow units must have a manufacturer’s date of:
(A) January 1, 2005, or later for (Class A) and (Class B); and (B) January 1, 2000, or later for (Class C) and (Class D).

4.4.4 When a Proposer submits its Proposal, if the Proposer does not have the minimum number of tow units described in Paragraph 4.4.1, the Proposer, if awarded the Contract, will have one-hundred-eighty (180) calendar days from the date that the Proposer signs and delivers the Contract, within which to obtain, operate, and place the tow units into service. The Proposer must submit proof, satisfactory to the City, of having obtained the required number of tow units.

4.4.5 A Proposer must not use or substitute one or more flatbed car carriers in place of the minimum number of Class A and Class B tow trucks.

4.4.6 If a Proposer does not have the minimum number of Class C tow units, or Class D tow trucks, or both, and if the Proposer has obtained written authorization from the Chief of Police or a designee, the Proposer may use the services of a subcontractor (another company or firm) who has those tow trucks. However, a Proposer must: (1) identify the subcontractor and 57 of 141

12 its tow trucks which the Proposer intends to use for Heavy Duty/Super Heavy Duty tows, and (2) the subcontractor must agree in writing to accept, perform, and comply with the Contract’s terms, conditions, requirements, and minimum performance standards when it provides Heavy Duty/Super Heavy Duty towing service.

4.4.7 A Proposer’s failure to obtain and place in service the required number of tow units within the one-hundred-eighty (180) day period will not only automatically disqualify the Proposer under this RFP, but may constitute a default and a material breach of the Contract. At its discretion, the City may then: reopen the proposal process; choose from among the remaining, if any, qualified proposers; reissue the RFP; negotiate directly with any firm for towing and storage services; or choose not to contract for services.

4.4.8 All vehicles that contractor operates shall be in compliance with all laws.

4.5 Trained Personnel

4.5.1 At its expense, the Proposer must have a sufficient number of properly licensed, trained, and qualified employees to perform the services described in the Contract.

4.5.2 When a Proposer submits its Proposal, if the Proposer does not have enough employees, or properly trained and qualified employees, or both, the Proposer, if awarded the Contract, will have one-hundred-eighty (180) calendar days from the date that the Proposer signs and delivers the Contract, within which to hire, train, and place the employees into service.

The Proposer must submit proof, satisfactory to the City, of having obtained properly skilled, licensed, and trained personnel.

4.5.3The OPTS Provider must meet the Contract’s employee licensing, training, testing, and certification requirements.

4.5.4 During the proposal evaluation process, one or more investigators from the Police Department may conduct a thorough background investigation of each employee of a Proposer. The background check may include, but is not limited to: criminal convictions, credit history, and civil liens and judgments. If the City conducts a background check, each employee of a Proposer must submit fingerprints and the Proposer must pay the City’s costs of fingerprinting the Proposer’s employees, or investigating them, or both. If any employee of the Proposer has one or more of the criminal convictions that are listed in Paragraphs 11.7 and 11.9 of the Contract, or that in the City’s opinion may: (1) disqualify the employee from operating a vehicle under California or federal law, (2) impede, hinder, frustrate, delay, or affect the Contract’s performance, or (3) increase the City’s liability, risk, or exposure, the City will give written notice to the Proposer, advising the Proposer of the employee’s ineligibility. Although 58 of 141

13 the Proposer may retain the disqualified employee, the Proposer must not use or dispatch that employee for a service that the Proposer provides to the City under the RFP and the Contract.

4.5.5 A Proposer’s failure to obtain and place in service skilled, licensed, eligible, and properly trained personnel within the one-hundred-eighty (180) day period will not only automatically disqualify the Proposer under this RFP, but may constitute a default and a material breach of the Contract. At its discretion, the City may then: reopen the proposal process; choose from among the remaining, if any, qualified proposers; reissue the RFP; negotiate directly with any firm for towing and storage services; or choose not to contract for services.

5. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In addition to the qualifications described in the prior pages of this RFP, the Proposer must fulfill the following conditions and requirements:

5.1Evidence of Financial Responsibility

5.1.1 As part of the City’s evaluation of a Proposal, the City will take into account whether the Proposer has sufficient financial resources to perform the services described in this RFP and the Contract. Each Proposer must attach the following financial information:
(A) Audited or reviewed financial statements, or compilations, prepared by a Certified Public Accountant, for calendar years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023; and
(B) A letter of reference from a bank or other financial institution.

5.2Compliance with Laws; Subletting; Ownership in other Businesses

5.1.2 Within one-hundred-eighty (180) calendar days after the Proposer signs and delivers the Contract, the Proposer must submit proof to the Chief of Police or a designee that the Proposer has complied with all applicable Glendale Municipal Codes, including but not limited to Zoning and Building & Safety Codes (e.g., furnish a copy of a City issued conditional use permit(s), variance(s), permit(s), “certificate of use and occupancy”, “business registration certificate”).

5.1.3 The Proposer must comply with all applicable (federal, state, county, and City) laws, rules, regulations, procedures, and orders.

5.1.4 The Proposer must comply with all applicable federal and state employment and hiring laws, such as Affirmative Action, Equal Employment Opportunity, and other nondiscriminatory practices. The 59 of 141

14 City may require the selected Proposer to furnish a copy of its employment and hiring practices and procedures.

5.1.5 Except as this RFP and the Contract allows, the Proposer must not use, rent, hire, or employ a subcontractor, or another OPTS Provider, their equipment, their personnel, or their facilities in order to perform the services described in this RFP and the Contract.

5.1.6 Unless an OPTS Provider obtains the Chief of Police’s or a designee’s prior written authorization, the OPTS Provider must not have any ownership or financial interest in another City of Glendale OPTS firm, any automobile dismantling or wrecking yard, automobile body or repair shop, used car business, or any other automobile-related business, other than an automobile towing and storage business.

5.3Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance

5.3.1 At its own expense, an OPTS Provider must obtain, pay for, and maintain during the Contract’s term “occurrence” insurance policies, listed below, to fully protect the OPTS Provider and the City from claims and suits for bodily injury, personal and advertising injury, property damage, and medical payments. Each policy below must add the City of Glendale, and its officers, agents, employees, and representatives (collectively, “its representatives”) as additional insureds:
(A) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY, covering the following exposures:
(1) Contractual Liability;
(2) Premises and Operations;
(3) Broad Form Property Damage;
(4) Explosion, Collapse and Underground;
(5) Products-Completed Operations;
(6) Independent Contractors; and
(7) Personal and Advertising Injury; and
(B) BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY for all vehicles, whether rented, leased, hired, scheduled, owned or non-owned, with an endorsement covering the following exposures:
60 of 141

15 (1) GARAGEKEEPERS LEGAL LIABILITY, protecting:
(a) A vehicle from loss or damage while the vehicle is
in the OPTS Provider’s care, custody, or control;
and
(b) A vehicle with collision coverage and “all risks”
(comprehensive) coverage;
(2) ON-HOOK LIABILITY, protecting a vehicle from loss or damage while the OPTS Provider tows or transports the
vehicle;
(3) CARGO LIABILITY, protecting:
(a) A vehicle from loss or damage while the OPTS
Provider transports the vehicle on a flatbed or other
carrier; and
(b) A vehicle’s contents or cargo from loss or damage
while the OPTS Provider tows, transports, or stores
the vehicle;
(4) UNINSURED MOTORIST - BODILY INJURY,
protecting a vehicle’s owner or operator from bodily injury while as a passenger in the OPTS Provider’s tow unit; and (5) POLLUTION LIABILITY, protecting against a vehicle’s sudden and non-sudden pollution release while the OPTS
Provider tows, transports, or stores the vehicle.

5.3.2 An OPTS Provider must maintain the insurance described in Paragraph

5.3.1 in the following amounts:
(A) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE in an
amount not less than:
(1) $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury (including accidental death) to any one person;
(2) $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury to any one person;
(3) $1,000,000 per occurrence for property damage; and
(4) $1,000,000 general aggregate limit;
61 of 141

16 (B) BUSINESS AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE in an
amount not less than:
(1) $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury (including accidental death) to any one person; and
(2) $1,000,000 per occurrence for property damage; or
(3) $1,000,000 combined single limit (CSL);
(C) GARAGEKEEPERS LEGAL LIABILITY INSURANCE in an
amount not less than $250,000 for each location from which the OPTS Provider furnishes services under this RFP and the Contract; (D) ON-HOOK INSURANCE in an amount not less than:

TOW TRUCK OR MINIMUM
FLATBED CARRIER: LIMIT PER
VEHICLE:
(1) CLASS A $100,000
(2) CLASS B $100,000
(3) CLASS C $250,000
(4) CLASS D $250,000;
(E) CARGO INSURANCE in an amount not less than $100,000 per vehicle;
(F) UNINSURED MOTORIST - BODILY INJURY INSURANCE
in an amount not less than $60,000 each accident; and
(G) POLLUTION LIABILITY INSURANCE in an amount not less than $250,000 each occurrence.

5.3.3 With the City’s written approval, an OPTS Provider may obtain “Garage Coverage Form” liability insurance, with a “Broadened Coverage - Garages” endorsement, as a substitute for a Commercial General Liability policy, or a Business Automobile Liability policy, or both, if the “Garage Coverage Form” policy meets or exceeds:
(A) The coverages and limits described in Paragraphs 5.3.1 and 5.3.2; and
(B) All other requirements and conditions for insurance described in this RFP and the Contract.

5.3.4 At all times, the insurance company issuing the policy must be an “admitted” insurer in the State of California; must be domiciled within, 62 of 141

17 and organized under the laws of, a state of the United States; and must carry an A.M. Best & Company minimum rating of “A:VII.”

5.3.5 Despite any conflicting provision in the OPTS Provider’s insurance policy to the contrary:
(A) The OPTS Provider’s insurance must cover all acts, errors, or omissions of the City and its representatives;
(B) The OPTS Provider’s insurance is primary;
(C) Other insurance (whether primary, excess, contingent, self- insurance, or any other basis) available to the City, or its representatives, or both, is excess over the OPTS Provider’s insurance;
(D) The City’s insurance, or self-insurance, or both, is non- contributory;
(E) The OPTS Provider’s insurance company waives any right of recovery that the company may have against the City, or its representatives, or both;
(F) The OPTS Provider’s insurance policy applies separately to each insured or additional insured, who is seeking coverage, or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except that the naming of multiple insureds will not increase the insurance company’s limits of liability;
(G) The OPTS Provider’s insurance policy applies to a claim or a suit brought by an additional insured against a Named Insured or another insured, arising out of bodily injury, personal injury, advertising injury, or property damage;
(H) The OPTS Provider’s insurance company must give the City written notice at least thirty (30) days in advance of the policy’s cancellation, termination, or reduction of coverage; and (I) The City is not liable for a premium payment or another expense under the OPTS Provider’s insurance policy.

5.3.6 With the signed Contract, the OPTS Provider must deliver to the City a “certificate of insurance” and an “additional insured endorsement” (collectively, “evidence of liability coverage”), both documents countersigned by the insurance carrier or its authorized representative, on forms satisfactory to the City Attorney or the City’s Risk Manager, which set forth this RFP’s and the Contract’s insurance provisions. 63 of 141

18 5.3.7 The countersigned certificate, along with the additional insured endorsement, must state: “The City of Glendale, and its officers, agents, employees, and representatives are added as additional insureds under the policy(s). This insurance is primary. The City’s insurance or self- insurance is non-contributory. The insurance afforded under the policy(s) applies separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought. The issuing company shall mail thirty (30) days advance notice to the City for the policy’s cancellation, termination, or reduction of coverage.”

5.3.8 Any deductibles or self-insured retentions are subject to the City’s review and approval. The insurance company or its authorized representative must state either on the insurance certificate or in a separate correspondence:
(A) The amount of any deductible, or self-insured retention, or both; (B) Whether any limit of insurance has been lowered by any pending or paid claim; and
(C) The current limit amount, as lowered by the paid or pending claim.

5.3.9 While the Contract is in effect, the City may do any one or more of the following:
(A) Review insurance coverage requirements;
(B) Require that the OPTS Provider:
(1) Obtain, pay for, and maintain more or less insurance depending on the City’s assessment of any one or more of the following factors:
(a) The City’s risk of liability or exposure arising out of, or in any way connected with, the OPTS
Provider’s services under the Contract;
(b) The nature or number of accidents, claims, or
lawsuits arising out of, or in any way connected with,
the OPTS Provider’s services under the Contracts; or
(c) The availability, or affordability, or both, of
increased liability insurance coverage;
(2) Reduce or eliminate a deductible or self-insured retention as it applies to the City; or
64 of 141

19 (3) Obtain, pay for, and maintain a bond (as a replacement for an insurance coverage) from a California corporate surety, guaranteeing payment to the City for liability, or costs, or both, that the City incurs during the City’s investigation, administration, or defense of a claim or a suit arising out of the Contract.

5.3.10 Twenty-one (21) days before the insurance policy’s expiration, cancellation, termination, or non-renewal, the OPTS Provider must deliver to the City evidence of liability coverage as proof that the OPTS Provider’s insurance has been renewed or replaced with another insurance policy which, while the Contract is in effect, meets all of the insurance requirements of this RFP and the Contract. At any time, upon the City’s request, the OPTS Provider must furnish the City with a complete copy of the OPTS Provider’s insurance policy or policies for the City’s review and approval.

5.3.11 If the OPTS Provider employs, hires, or uses a subcontractor, whom the City has approved of and authorized in writing, to perform Heavy Duty or Super Heavy Duty towing services under this RFP and the Contract, the OPTS Provider must ensure that the subcontractor:
(A) Meets, and fully complies with, all of the insurance requirements in this RFP and the Contract;
(B) Delivers to the City evidence of liability coverage for the City’s review and approval; and
(C) Furnishes the City, at any time upon its request, with a complete copy of the subcontractor’s insurance policy or policies for the City’s review and approval.

5.3.12 This RFP’s and the Contract’s insurance provisions:
(A) Are separate and independent from the indemnification and defense provisions in the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP; and (B) Do not limit, in any way, the applicability, scope, or obligations of this RFP’s and the Contract’s indemnification and defense provisions.

5.4 Workers’ Compensation Insurance

5.4.1 For the purpose of workers’ compensation liability, the OPTS Provider acknowledges that all persons furnishing services to the City under the Contract are employees solely of the OPTS Provider and not of the City.

The OPTS Provider is solely responsible and liable for:
65 of 141

20 (A) Furnishing workers’ compensation benefits to its personnel, or anyone the OPTS Provider directly or indirectly hires, employs, or uses; and
(B) Injuries arising out of, or connected with, the work, services, or operations performed on the OPTS Provider’s behalf.

5.4.2 At its own expense, the OPTS Provider must obtain, pay for, and maintain for the duration of the Contract, complete workers’ compensation insurance, meeting or exceeding the coverages and amounts that California law requires. With the signed Contract, the OPTS Provider must deliver to the City either an insurance certificate or a certificate of consent to self-insure (“evidence of workers’ compensation coverage”).

5.4.3 The OPTS Provider’s workers’ compensation insurance company must give the City written notice at least thirty (30) days in advance of the policy’s expiration, cancellation, or termination, or non-renewal.

5.4.4 Twenty-one (21) days before the expiration, cancellation, termination, revocation, or non-renewal of the insurance policy or certificate of consent to self-insure, the OPTS Provider must deliver to the City evidence of workers’ compensation coverage as proof that the OPTS Provider is complying with the workers’ compensation insurance requirements of this RFP and the Contract. At any time, upon the City’s request, the OPTS Provider must furnish the City with a complete copy of the OPTS Provider’s insurance policy or policies for the City’s review, or approval, or both.

5.4.5 The City of Glendale will not be liable to the OPTS Provider’s personnel, or anyone the OPTS Provider directly or indirectly hires, employs, or uses, for any claims at law or in equity caused by the OPTS Provider’s failure to comply with the workers’ compensation insurance requirements of this RFP and the Contract.

5.5 OPTS Provider’s Failure to Obtain, Pay For, or Maintain Insurance

5.5.1 The OPTS Provider’s failure to comply with an insurance provision in this RFP or the Contract constitutes a default and a material breach upon which the City may immediately terminate or suspend the Contract, or invoke another remedy that the Contract or the law allows. If the City terminates or suspends the Contract, the City may use the services of another City of Glendale OPTS, or any other towing and storage firm, without the City’s incurring any liability to the defaulting OPTS Provider. 66 of 141

21 5.5.2 In the interest of maintaining essential public safety services, and at its sole discretion, the City may obtain or renew the OPTS Provider’s insurance, and the City may pay all or part of the premiums. Upon demand, the OPTS Provider must repay and reimburse the City for all sums or monies that the City paid to obtain, renew, or reinstate the OPTS Provider’s insurance. The City may offset the cost of the premium against any sums or monies that the City may owe the OPTS Provider.

5.6 Indemnification

5.6.1 To the fullest extent that the law permits, the OPTS Provider must indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its Police Department — including, each one’s officers, agents, employees, and representatives (individually and collectively, “the City Indemnitee”)— from and against any and all:
(A) Liability, claims, suits, actions, proceedings (including arbitration, mediation, administrative, regulatory), judgments, liens, injuries, losses, accidents, or damages (collectively, “Liability”), whether the Liability is:
(1) In contract or in tort;
(2) Imposed by law in the absence of a contract or agreement; (3) Such that the OPTS Provider would have in the absence of a contract or agreement;
(4) For bodily injury (including accidental death), personal and advertising injury, or property damage;
(5) Actual, alleged, or threatened;
(6) False, fraudulent, or groundless; and
(B) Fees, costs, sums, or expenses of any kind (collectively, “Expenses”) including, but not limited to:
(1) Attorneys’ fees;
(2) Defense costs, litigation costs, court costs, appeal costs; (3) Arbitration, mediation, administrative, or regulatory proceeding costs;
(4) Accountant, expert witness, or another professional’s fees; (5) Pre- or post-judgment or settlement interest;
67 of 141

22 (C) Liability, or Expenses, or both, caused by, or arising out of, or in any way related to, or in any way connected with— whether in whole or in part— any one or more of the following:
(1) The Contract;
(2) An act, error, or omission of:
(a) The OPTS Provider, its officers, agents, employees, or representatives;
(b) A subcontractor, person, firm, or entity whom the
OPTS Provider directly or indirectly hires,
employs, or uses to provide or perform services—
including Heavy Duty or Super Heavy Duty
towing— under this RFP and the Contract; or
(c) The City Indemnitee (regardless of whether the
City Indemnitee’s act, error, omission, conduct, or
misconduct was willful or negligent, either
actively, passively, vicariously, or not at all);
(3) The OPTS Provider’s work, services, or
operations (whether ongoing or completed) under
the Contract;
(4) The OPTS Provider’s performance or nonperformance of the Contract;
(5) The OPTS Provider’s premises, facilities, personnel, tow units, vehicles, or equipment;
(6) The Contract’s conditions and requirements concerning the employment eligibility or ineligibility status of the OPTS Provider’s personnel or a subcontractor’s employees; (7) The OPTS Provider’s paying or withholding, or failing to pay or to withhold, wages, salaries, benefits, Social
Security, Medicare, retirement, exactions, entitlements, emoluments, taxes, and any other expenses of any nature whatsoever;
(8) The OPTS Provider’s complying, or failing to comply, with a (federal, state, county, or City) law, rule, regulation, procedure, or order;
68 of 141

23 (9) The City’s enforcing this indemnification and defense provision; and
(D) Liability, or Expenses, or both, regardless of whether they may occur, or may be discovered, before or after the Contract’s termination, cancellation, or expiration.

5.6.2 Under the Contract and this RFP, the OPTS Provider assumes Liability and Expenses arising out of the Contract. Without affecting the City’s rights under any provision of the Contract or this RFP, the OPTS Provider will not indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City Indemnitee, as set forth in Paragraph 5.6.1, for Liability and Expenses attributable to the sole fault of the City Indemnitee, if the parties agree in writing, or if a court of competent jurisdiction issues written findings, determining that the City Indemnitee was solely at fault. This exception applies only in instances where the City Indemnitee is shown to have been solely at fault.

5.6.3 However, in instances where the OPTS Provider is solely or partially at fault, or in instances where the City Indemnitee’s fault accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the OPTS Provider’s obligations under the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP are all-inclusive and the OPTS Provider must indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City Indemnitee for all Liability and Expenses, even though a percentage of Liability or fault is attributable to the City Indemnitee’s act, error, omission, conduct, or misconduct. The OPTS Provider acknowledges that its obligation under the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP extends to Liability or fault attributable to the City Indemnitee, if that Liability or fault is less than the sole Liability or sole fault of the City Indemnitee.

5.6.4 Under this Section’s indemnification and defense provisions:
(A) An entry of judgment against the City Indemnitee conclusively establishes:
(1) The OPTS Provider’s obligation to pay the judgment, or Expenses, or both; and
(2) That the amount of the judgment, or Expenses, or both, is correct and reasonable;
(B) The OPTS Provider must not condition its obligation to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless the City Indemnitee on:
(1) The City Indemnitee’s having to first pay an injured party or a judgment; or
(2) The extent of insurance available to, or provided by, the 69 of 141

24 OPTS Provider; and
(C) Workers’ compensation laws do not limit the OPTS Provider’s obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City Indemnitee. The OPTS Provider expressly waives its statutory immunity under those laws as to the City Indemnitee.

5.6.5 The OPTS Provider must pay, compensate, and reimburse the injured party or parties, and the City Indemnitee:
(A) As Liability, or Expenses, or both, are incurred;
(B) Immediately upon any settlement or compromise of Liability, or Expenses, or both; or
(C) Immediately upon any entry of judgment.

5.6.6 The OPTS Provider must obtain executed indemnity agreements, with provisions identical to those set forth in the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP, from a subcontractor, person, firm or entity whom Contractor directly or indirectly hires, employs, or uses to provide or perform services— including Heavy Duty or Super Heavy Duty towing— under this RFP and the Contract. Regardless of whether the OPTS Provider obtains the written indemnity obligation from a subcontractor as this RFP and the Contract require here, the OPTS Provider remains fully liable to the City Indemnitee for all Liability, or Expenses, or both, according to terms under the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP.

5.6.7 The OPTS Provider and the City intend not only that the City Indemnitee must be completely protected from and against all Liability and Expenses, but also that each provision in the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP must be interpreted and construed under the law to provide the fullest protection possible to the City Indemnitee. Accordingly, the OPTS Provider acknowledges that the City would have neither selected the OPTS Provider from its Proposal, nor entered into the Contract in the absence of the OPTS Provider’s commitment to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City Indemnitee under the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP.

5.6.8 This RFP’s and the Contract’s indemnification and defense provisions:
(A) Are separate and independent from the insurance provisions in the Contract and Section 5.3 of this RFP; and
(B) Do not limit, in any way, the applicability, scope, or obligations of this RFP’s and the Contract’s insurance provisions.
70 of 141

25 5.6.9 The OPTS Provider’s failure to comply with the indemnity provisions of the Contract and Section 5.6 of this RFP constitutes a default and a material breach upon which the City may immediately terminate or suspend the Contract, or invoke another remedy that the Contract or the law allows.

5.7 Independent Contractor Status

5.7.1 This RFP and the Contract are not intended, and must not be construed, to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association between the City and the OPTS Provider. The OPTS Provider understands that in performing its services under the RFP and the Contract, the OPTS Provider is, and will be, an independent contractor. The OPTS Provider acknowledges that the OPTS Provider and its employees, subcontractors, and anyone whom the OPTS Provider directly or indirectly hires, employs, or uses are not employees or agents of the City under any circumstance.

5.7.2 The OPTS Provider has, and will retain, the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all persons whom the OPTS Provider uses in performing the services under the Contract. The OPTS Provider must provide the required services in its own manner and method, except as this RFP and the Contract specify. The OPTS Provider must treat any provision in this RFP or the Contract that may appear either to give the City the right to direct the OPTS Provider as to the details of doing the work, or to exercise a measure of control over the work, as giving the OPTS Provider direction only as to the work’s end result.

5.7.3 The OPTS Provider will have sole responsibility for:
(A) Paying its personnel’s salaries, disability, unemployment, workers’ compensation, and any other expenses or benefits connected with this Agreement; and
(B) Making all necessary payroll deductions for insurance, Social Security, Medicare, income taxes, and other applicable
withholdings or taxes.

5.7.4 The OPTS Provider and its employees, agents, subcontractors, and anyone whom the OPTS Provider directly or indirectly hires, employs, or uses are not entitled to receive from City any benefits or rights that City affords to its employees, including, but not limited to: overtime, compensation time, sick leave, vacation leave, or holiday pay; California Public Employees Retirement System benefits, Social Security, or retirement savings; Medicare or insurance, including health, life, dental, long or short term disability, or workers’ compensation.
71 of 141

26 6. INTERPRETATION OR CORRECTION OF RFP

6.1 Before submitting its Proposal, the Proposer must carefully study and compare the components of this RFP and the Contract, must examine the areas comprising the tow District, and must observe the conditions under which the Proposer will perform the services.

6.2 If the Proposer has any question about this RFP, the Contract, or the scope of work, or if the Proposer finds any error, inconsistency, or ambiguity in the RFP, or the Contract, or both, the Proposer must make a written “Request for Clarification” before submitting its Proposal. The Proposer must submit a Request for Clarification to:

6.3 The City must receive written inquiries on or before 4:00 p.m., October 16, 2024. The Request for Clarification may be mailed, hand delivered, or delivered by courier or package delivery service. A firm mailing its Request for Clarification should allow sufficient delivery time to ensure that the City receives it on time.

6.4 If necessary, the City will make clarifications, interpretations, corrections, or changes to the RFP, or the Contract, or both, in writing by issuing Addenda, as described in Section 7 of this RFP. A Proposer must not rely upon, and the City is not bound by, purported clarifications, interpretations, corrections, or changes to the RFP and the Contract, that are made verbally or in a manner other than a written advisory from the City.

7. ADDENDA

7.1 The City will issue Addenda in writing only. The City will make reasonable efforts to deliver Addenda to all Proposers whom the City knows have received a complete set of the RFP and have provided a street address for receipt of Addenda. The City cannot guarantee that all Proposers will receive all Addenda.

7.2 Proposers may also inspect the Addenda at the Glendale Police Department’s Traffic Bureau, during its business hours, Monday - Friday, 7:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. This RFP is also on file there.

7.3 At any time before the “Proposal Deadline” (Paragraph 10.2.1 of this RFP), the City may issue Addenda withdrawing the RFP or postponing the Proposal Deadline. However, if any Addenda results in a material change to this RFP, Glendale Police Department Traffic Bureau
ATTN: Lieutenant Tigran Topadzhikyan and
Ann Maurer, Chief Assistant City Attorney
131 North Isabel Street
Glendale, CA 91206-4382
[email protected] and [email protected] 72 of 141

27 or the Contract, or both, the City will extend the Proposal Deadline by not less than seventy-two (72) hours.

8. USING THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL FORMS

8.1 “Proposal Forms” (PF:1 to PF:46) are attached to this RFP. A Proposer who is applying for more than one District must mark the appropriate boxes on PF:1.

PF:1 must be included with all Proposals. The Proposer must fill in the blanks on the Proposal Forms using Word or a PDF form filler.

8.2 The Proposer must respond to the Proposal Forms’ questions with all applicable information, in order for the City to consider the Proposal as “responsive.” If a Proposer fails to provide the information that the form requires, fails to return all of the forms/required documents, or fails to submit the required attachments, the City may treat the Proposal as “non-responsive.

8.3 The Proposer must place initials next to all interlineations, alterations, and erasures on the Proposal Forms/Responsive Proposal.

8.4 The Proposer must not modify or qualify the Proposal Form in any manner.

Unauthorized conditions, exemptions, limitations, or provisions attached to a Proposal will render it informal and may cause its rejection.

8.5 With the Proposal, each Proposer must submit the following attachments:

8.5.1 Photographs of the business office, customer waiting area, storage area for police hold vehicles, primary and secondary storage lots, and disposal lots (See: PF:19);

8.5.2 Photographs of tow trucks and flatbed carriers (See: PF:20 - PF:21);

8.5.3 Employees’ resumes (See: PF:22 - PF:26);

8.5.4 Audited or reviewed financial statements, or compilations (See: PF:29);

8.5.5 Bank’s reference letter (See: PF:29); and

8.5.6 Insurance certificate (See: PF:40).

8.6 Using the supplied Proposal Forms (PF:1 to PF:4), the Proposer must certify that:

8.6.1 Proposer has read, examined, and is fully familiar with all of: (1) the RFP’s provisions, (2) the Contract’s terms, conditions, requirements, specifications, and minimum performance standards, and (3) any Addenda issued during the proposal period (collectively, “the Documents”);
73 of 141

28 8.6.2 Proposer has carefully checked all words, figures, and statements made in the Documents;

8.6.3 Proposer is satisfied that the Documents are accurate;

8.6.4 Proposer understands and accepts all of the Documents’ provisions;

8.6.5 Proposer has examined the area comprising the tow District for which the Proposal is submitted, and Proposer is fully familiar with all conditions and matters that may affect, in any way, Proposer’s services or costs;

8.6.6 Proposer has fully considered all other matters that may affect, in any way, Proposer’s services or costs;

8.6.7 Proposer offers to fully perform all of the duties and obligations specified in the Documents in exchange for the consideration described in the Documents;

8.6.8 The Proposal is an irrevocable offer for a period of at least one-hundred- fifty (150) calendar days following City’s opening of all Proposals;

8.6.9 Except as the Contract or California law allows, City is not liable or responsible for any costs, fees, or expenses that Proposer incurs for any one or more of the following: (1) responding to the RFP, (2) anticipating or preparing for an award of a tow District, (3) obtaining any equipment, personnel, facilities, or other items to comply with the Documents’ provisions, or (4) performing the services under the Contract;

8.6.10Within fourteen (14) calendar days after City issues the Notice of Intent to Award OPTS Contract, or within any extension that City may allow, Proposer agrees to: (1) sign and deliver the Contract, of which the RFP, its attached Exhibits, and the Notice calling for Proposals are a part, and (2) furnish the insurance that the Documents require;

8.6.11 At its expense, Proposer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its Police Department— including, each one’s officers, agents, employees, and representatives— from and against any and all liability, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, claims, demands, liens, losses, damages, costs, and expenses (including attorneys’ fees, litigation, arbitration, mediation, appeal expenses) if a dispute, lawsuit, or other proceeding arises out of any one or more of the following: (1) Proposer’s submitting the Proposal, (2) City’s accepting Proposer’s Proposal, or (3) City’s awarding a contract to Proposer in compliance with this RFP, or state, federal, or local laws.
74 of 141

29 8.7 The Proposer must certify under the penalty of perjury that:

8.7.1 Proposer’s Proposal is genuine, is not a sham or collusive, and is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any person, partnership, corporation, firm, organization, or another entity not named or disclosed in the Proposal;

8.7.2 Proposer did not, directly or indirectly, induce, agree, or solicit anyone else to submit a false or sham Proposal, to refrain from proposing, to withdraw a Proposal, or to attempt to induce an action prejudicial to City’s interests;

8.7.3 Proposer has not sought by collusion, in any manner, to secure for Proposer any advantage over other proposers; and

8.7.4 All facts and statements in the Proposal are completely true, accurate, and correct.

8.8 The City will not consider any Proposal that a Proposer submits without the certification. If the City’s review and investigation of a Proposal during the RFP evaluation period, or any time afterwards, reveals that any information, fact, or statement in the Proposal is incomplete, incorrect, false, inaccurate, misleading, or fraudulent, the Proposer may be disqualified from consideration for any contract award, and the City reserves the right to cancel and rescind, at any time, the Contract awarded to the successful Proposer.

8.9 The person or persons legally authorized to bind the Proposer to the RFP must sign the Proposal in ink. The individuals signing the Proposal must represent that they are authorized to bind the Proposer’s legal entity.

8.9.1 A corporation must execute the Proposal by its duly authorized officer(s) in accordance with its corporate bylaws.

8.9.2 A partnership must execute the Proposal by all of its partners. After each signature, each partner must list a residential address or the firm’s address, either of which must include the state, zip code, and telephone number.

8.9.3 If the Proposer is a joint venture consisting of a combination of any of the above entities, each entity in the joint venture must sign the Proposal. An individual signing a Proposal as an agent of another or others must attach to the Proposal evidence of that person’s legal authority to sign on behalf of another or others.
75 of 141

30 9. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

9.1Submittals

9.1.1 A Proposer must submit one (1) Proposal, via email or delivered on a flash drive.

9.1.2 A Proposer must indicate the following information when submitting a proposal:
“PROPOSAL FOR OFFICIAL POLICE TOW

SERVICES,
FOR DISTRICT(S) _ ” (In the blank,
identify the applicable District or Districts, by number: 1 2 3.)

9.1.3 Proposals must be emailed or delivered in a manner to ensure they are received by the deadline to:

Glendale Police Department Traffic
Bureau ATTN: Lieutenant Tigran
Topadzhikyan
[email protected]
131 North Isabel
Street Glendale, CA
91206-4382

9.2 Proposal Deadline

9.1.4 The City must receive a Proposal at the above address no later than October 31, 2024 at 4:00 p.m. (“the Proposal Deadline”). A firm mailing its Proposal should allow sufficient delivery time to ensure that the City receives the Proposal by the Proposal Deadline. The Proposer alone is responsible for delivering its Proposal on time.

9.1.5The City will not accept late Proposals. The City will return, unopened, any Proposal received after the exact time of the Proposal Deadline.

9.1.6 Oral, telephonic, facsimile, telegraphic, or electronically transmitted Proposals are invalid and the City will not accept or consider them.

10. DISPOSITION OF PROPOSALS

10.1 All Proposals submitted in response to this RFP become the property of the City of Glendale, and the City will retain or discard them, as the law allows. 76 of 141

31 10.2 The Proposer must identify on the accompanying Proposal Forms (PF:44) all copyrighted material, trade secrets, or other proprietary information (“protectable documents”) that the Proposer included in its Proposal which Proposer believes should be exempt from disclosure under California’s Public Records Act, Government Code Section 7923.000, et seq.

10.3 By listing the documents, the Proposer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its Police Department— including, each one’s officers, agents, employees, and representatives— from and against any action, claim, lawsuit, or proceeding, including costs and expenses, arising out of or connected with the City’s refusal to disclose the protectable documents to any party making a request for those items.

10.4 The City will treat any Proposer, who fails to identify on PF:44 protectable documents that the Proposer believes should be exempt from disclosure, as having waived its right to an exemption from disclosure, as the Public Records Act provides.

11. COMMUNICATION WITH, AND GIFTS OR GRATUITIES TO, THE CITY

AND OTHERS PROHIBITED

11.1 After the Proposal Deadline, and continuing until the City awards the last contract, if any:

11.1.1 Glendale City Council members and City employees involved in the RFP process will not hold any meetings, conferences, or discussions with any Proposer, except as this RFP allows; and

11.1.2 A Proposer must not communicate, in any manner, with the individuals listed in Paragraph 12.1.1, unless authorized by the City.

Proposers and their representatives are not prohibited, however, from making oral statements or presentations in public to one or more representatives of the City during a public meeting. In addition, Proposers may write to the City Council as a whole once the staff recommendations are made in anticipation of a public meeting.

11.2 From the date of the report to Council recommending the initiation of a competitive process for Official Police Tow Services, to the date on which the City awards the last contract, if any, a Proposer must not directly or indirectly give, furnish, donate, or promise any money, compensation, gift, gratuity, or anything of value to the individuals listed in Paragraph 12.1.1, for the purpose of, or which has the effect of:

11.2.1 Securing or establishing an advantage over other Proposers;

11.2.2 Securing or recommending the selection of the Proposer’s Proposal; or

11.2.3 Securing or recommending the Contract’s award to the Proposer. 77 of 141

32 11.3 Violations of Paragraphs 12.1.2, or Paragraph 12.2, or both, will constitute grounds for rejection.

12. WITHDRAWAL, CANCELLATION, OR MODIFICATION OF A PROPOSAL

12.1Before the Proposal Deadline, a Proposer may withdraw and then modify a Proposal, by giving written notice, signed by the Proposer. A withdrawal request must be addressed as follows and delivered to:

Glendale Police Department Traffic
Bureau ATTN: Lieutenant Tigran
Topadzhikyan
[email protected]
131 North Isabel Street
Glendale, CA 91206-4382

12.2 For a withdrawal to become effective, the Traffic Bureau must receive the Proposer’s request for withdrawal before the Proposal Deadline. The City will not accept or consider a Proposer’s verbal request for modification or withdrawal of a Proposal.

12.3 If a Proposer withdraws its Proposal, the withdrawal will not prejudice the Proposer’s right to submit a new Proposal, if the new Proposal is submitted:
(1) in accordance with the RFP’s requirements, and (2) before the Proposal Deadline.

12.4After the Proposal Deadline, a Proposer must not withdraw, cancel, or modify its Proposal for a period of at least one-hundred-fifty (150) calendar days following the Proposals’ opening on October __**, 2024 subject to the exception in Paragraph 13.5. The City may extend the 150 day period upon the City’s written request and upon the affected Proposers’ written approval.

12.5 The City may allow a Proposer to withdraw or cancel a Proposal after the opening of the Proposals, if the Proposer establishes, to the City’s satisfaction, that all of the following circumstances exist:

12.5.1 The Proposer made a mistake in its Proposal;

12.5.2 Within five (5) days after the Proposal’s opening, the City receives from the Proposer written notice of the mistake and the notice specifies in detail how the mistake occurred;

12.5.3 The mistake made the Proposal materially different from what the Proposer had intended it to be; and

12.5.4 The mistake was made in filling out the Proposal and was not due to 78 of 141

33 error in judgment, carelessness in inspecting the tow service area (District), or carelessness in reading the RFP or the Contract.

13. OPENING OF PROPOSALS

13.1 On October __#, 2024, the City will open all Proposals that were submitted in accordance with Paragraph 10.1.2, and that were received on or before the Proposal Deadline. The City will maintain a “Register of Proposals” that lists the Proposer’s name, the date, and the time that the City had received the Proposal. The Register of Proposals will be open to public inspection after the City has awarded all Contracts.

14. INITIAL REVIEW OF PROPOSALS; SELECTION PROCESS AND

CRITERIA

14.1Overview
The City will follow the four (4) steps described below for evaluating each Proposal and selecting an OPTS Provider:

14.1.1 First, designated personnel from the Police Department will determine whether a Proposal is “responsive” to the RFP, by:
(A) Verifying the Proposal’s compliance with the RFP’s
terms and conditions, and
(B) Examining the Proposal for completeness of
information and attachments.

14.1.2 Second, staff, as designated by the Police Chief, will determine whether the Proposer, who has submitted a responsive Proposal, is “responsible,” by:
(A) Reviewing background checks on the candidates
under consideration;
(B) Visiting and inspecting the towing and storage facilities of the candidates under consideration;
(C) Interviewing up to three (3) candidates, if any, per District; and
(D) Listening to the candidates’ oral presentation.
79 of 141

34 14.1.3 Third, for each District, the designated staff will deliver written recommendations, if any, to the Chief of Police for his consideration.

14.1.4 Fourth, the Chief of Police will make recommendations regarding the most qualified Proposers to the City Council. The City Council will award the OPTS contracts.

14.2 Responsive Proposal

14.2.1 The designated Police Department personnel will evaluate each Proposal to determine whether it is “responsive.” The term “responsive” means that the Proposal has been prepared and submitted in accordance with the RFP’s requirements. In other words, the Proposer has:
(A) Properly completed and signed the Proposal (PF:1 to PF:4);. (B) Properly completed the “Proposer’s Qualifications Statement” forms (PF:10 to PF:46); and
(C) Submitted the documents and attachments that the Proposal Forms (PF:1 to PF:46) and this RFP require.

14.2.2 The City may reject any Proposal that is not accompanied by any item that the Proposal Forms (PF:1 to PF:46) and this RFP require, or that is in any other way incomplete or irregular.

14.2.3 Unauthorized conditions, limitations, or provisions included in, or attached to, the Proposal, or an incomplete submittal, may render the Proposal “non-responsive” and may cause its
rejection.

14.2.4 Process
(A) The designated Police Department personnel will
simultaneously open the sealed Proposals. They will then review each Proposal for completeness, clarity of content, and adherence to the RFP’s requirements.
(B) The Support Services Captain or acting Captain will then forward all “responsive” RFP’s to staff designated by the Chief of Police.

14.3 Responsible Proposer

14.3.1 The staff designated by the Police Chief will review the Proposals and determine the “responsible” Proposer for each tow District. 80 of 141

35 The term “responsible” means that the Proposer is able to demonstrate that it possesses:
(A) The capacity, in terms of financial strength, resources available, and experience, to perform the services described in the RFP and the Contract; and
(B) The integrity and trustworthiness to perform and
complete the services that RFP and the Contract require.

14.3.2 In determining whether a Proposer is “responsible,” the designated staff may consider any one or more of the following factors in relation to the services that the Proposer will perform under this RFP and the Contract:
(A) Demonstrated financial strength including, but not limited to, the Proposer’s:
(1)Current facilities, equipment, and personnel;
(2)Capability of securing financing for facilities,
equipment, personnel, or other resources;
(3)Credit worthiness;
(B) Quality of the Proposer’s existing or proposed
facilities, equipment, and personnel;
(C) Demonstrated and successful completion of services of similar scope and size, including, but not limited to:
(1)Years of experience that the Proposer has as an OPTS Provider or a municipal tow service provider;
(2)Timeliness of performance;
(3)Customer satisfaction or complaints;
(4)Other cities’ and clients’ evaluations of the Proposer’s prior or current services;
(D) Demonstrated safety record for the Proposer’s tow vehicles and employees; or
(E) Degree to which the Proposer has taken into account the Glendale community’s needs and priorities.
81 of 141

36 14.3.3 The designated staff may consider any one or more of the following factors as indicia that the Proposer is not “responsible,” thereby disqualifying the Proposer:
(A) Evidence of collusion between the Proposer and other Proposers;
(B) The Proposer’s having falsified, misrepresented, or withheld any information that the RFP or the Contract requires the Proposer to disclose;
(C) The Proposer’s having given prior poor or unsatisfactory service to the City or other government clients;
(D) The Proposer’s or its employees’ having performed work or services without a required license, permit, or certification; (E) The Proposer’s or its employees’ having disregarded laws, rules, regulations, procedures, orders, and directives;
(F) The Proposer’s lack of competency as revealed by: financial statements, experience, equipment, facilities, training, personnel; or customer complaints, claims, or lawsuits; (G) The Proposer’s having a history of vehicular accidents, property damage, or thefts occurring while the Proposer has operated its towing and storage business;
(H) The Proposer’s having been convicted of a crime related to the bidding, the awarding, or the performance of a government contract;
(I) The Proposer’s having claims or litigation concerning contracts, bids, or projects; or the Proposer’s having been terminated or disqualified from contracts, bids, or projects;
(J) The Proposer’s having failed to fulfill or perform the terms of a contract, or having defaulted on a contract, within the past five (5) years; or
(K) The Proposer’s having failed to meet a contract’s required and agreed-upon schedules or deadlines.

14.3.4 The designated staff will determine whether a Proposer is responsible based upon:
(A) The information that the Proposer submits, as contained in the “Proposer’s Qualification Statement” (PF:10 to PF:46) and its 82 of 141

37 attachments;
(B) A background check (described on the next page);
(C) A site inspection;
(D) The Proposer’s interview and oral presentation; and (E) Other documents or other sources of information provided or obtained as part of the review process.

14.3.5 The designated staff may require a Proposer to clarify its Proposal or provide additional information, verbally or in writing, as staff deems necessary, to assist in evaluating the Proposals and to ensure that the selected Proposer will perform the services under this RFP and the Contract.

14.3.6 Process
(A) The staff designated by the Police Chief will score each Proposal, using the following categories and points:

Category Points
(1) Service Requirements 25
(2) Qualifications of Personnel & Management 20
(3) Facility & Equipment Requirements 25
(4) Prior Experience 15
(5) References 5
(6) Financial Viability 10
(7) MAXIMUM TOTAL POINTS: 100
(B) If a Proposer has submitted a Proposal that covers more than one District, the designated staff will assign a separate and independent score for each District. A score assigned to one District will not be combined or averaged with a score given to another District.
(C) For each District, the designated staff will rank each Proposal in descending order based on the highest numbers of points given to each Proposal. The designated staff will create, for its own purposes, an “initial short list” of up to three (3) Proposers, per District, who will be placed in descending order, based on their score.
(D) On behalf of the designated staff, one or more investigators from the Police Department will perform a “background
check” on the selected Proposers who are on the designated 83 of 141

38 staff’s “initial short list,” to ensure that the potential Proposer not only has the required financial and other resources to provide dependable towing and storage services for the City, but also will provide the highest levels of customer service.

The background check may include, but is not limited to:
(1) Interviewing municipal clients and others about their past or present experiences with the Proposer as a towing and storage firm;
(2) Contacting the bank that prepared the Proposer’s
reference letter;
(3) Obtaining criminal history;
(4) Searching bankruptcy, liens, and civil judgment records; and
(5) Investigating or verifying any other information that the designated staff believes is relevant to selecting an
OPTS Provider under the RFP.
(E) Based on the background check, if the designated staff determines that the candidate is not a responsible Proposer, the designated staff will select as a replacement the next highest scoring Proposer who applied for that District. Any Proposer whom the designated staff selects as a replacement will be subject to the same background check. The designated staff will then prepare a “final short list” of candidates.
(F) For each district, the designated staff will invite up to three (3) Proposers on the “final short list” for an interview and oral presentation. Before the interviews occur, the designated staff will inspect the towing and storage facilities, equipment, and personnel of every Proposer who is on the “final short list.” (G) During the interviews, the designated staff must not communicate the initial scores to the participating Proposers.

The oral interview will consist of standard questions asked of all Proposers, and specific questions regarding the Proposer’s Proposal or the Proposer’s ability to provide the facilities, equipment, personnel, and services that the City requires. In addition, the Proposer must give the designated staff an oral presentation, not to exceed thirty (30) minutes, on how it will achieve and ensure throughout the Contract’s duration:
84 of 141

39 (1) Expeditious, reliable towing;
(2) Secure, dependable storage;
(3) Quality service; and
(4) Utmost customer satisfaction for the City and the public. (H) The designated staff may then re-score the Proposal based on the site inspection, the interview, the oral presentation, or on any combination of these factors.
(I) After the designated staff reaches a consensus as to the responsible Proposers whom they believe can provide the best service to a particular District, they will deliver their written recommendation to the Chief of Police for his consideration. (J) The Chief of Police will prepare a report to the City Council for its deliberation and its decision on awarding the OPTS contracts.

15. AWARD OF CONTRACT

15.1 If the City Council selects Proposals, the City will give the selected Proposers a “Notice of Intent to Award OPTS Contract” that will specify the “start date” for performing the Contract’s services.

15.2 The RFP, or any part of it, and the Proposer’s responses, will be incorporated into and made a part of the Contract. The City reserves the right to further negotiate the terms and conditions of the Contract. The Proposer whom the City Council selects for a tow District must cooperate with the City in good faith to negotiate, sign, and deliver the final Contract. The City will draft the Contract and may require the selected Proposer to attend one or more Contract negotiation conferences to discuss possible:

15.2.1 Revisions to the Contract’s service-related terms, conditions, requirements, specifications, or minimum performance standards, other than the insurance and the indemnity provisions; and

15.2.2 Additions to the Contract, by the parties’ mutual agreement, or as a City Ordinance or Resolution, the City’s Charter or Municipal Code, or any other law may require.

15.3 At any time, and for any reason, if contract negotiations with the selected Proposer fail to progress, to the City’s reasonable satisfaction, the City reserves the right to end negotiations with the selected Proposer.. At its discretion, the City may then: reopen the proposal process; choose from among the remaining, if any, qualified proposers; reissue the RFP; negotiate 85 of 141

40 directly with any firm for towing and storage services; or choose not to contract for services.

15.4 The services described in this RFP and in the Contract are for a period of three (3) years, and the City will have a one (1) time option to renew the OPTS Provider’s services for a period of two (2) years. Exercise of the one- time renewal option is at the Chief of Police’s sole discretion and requires the City Manager’s written approval.

15.5 Within 45 calendar days after the City issues the Notice of Intent to Award OPTS Contract, or within any extension that the City may allow, the selected Proposer must submit to the City all of the following items:

15.5.1 Two (2) originals of the Contract, properly signed by the Proposer.

15.5.2 Insurance certificates and additional insured endorsements that fully conform to the Contract’s requirements.

15.6 After the City receives the signed Contracts and insurance documents, the City Attorney’s office will review the Contract. Additionally, the City Attorney’s office or the City’s Risk Manager will review the required insurance. If the selected Proposer has not changed any terms of the Contract, and if the insurance conforms to the Contract’s requirements, the City will sign the Contract and return an original of the Contract to the Proposer.

16. CITY’S RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

16.1 This RFP and the proposal evaluation process do not:

16.1.1 Obligate the City to accept any Proposal; and

16.1.2 Constitute an agreement by the City that it will actually enter into any contract with any Proposer.

16.2 When it best serves the City’s interests, the City may do any one or more of the following:

16.2.1 Reject any Proposal or all Proposals;

16.2.2 Extend the deadline for accepting Proposals;

16.2.3 Waive any or all information, defects, irregularities, or informalities in a Proposal;

16.2.4 Accept amendments to Proposals after the Proposal Deadline;

16.2.5 Amend, revise, or change the RFP’s evaluation or selection criteria; 86 of 141

41 16.2.6 Cancel, withdraw, amend, revise, change, or negotiate the terms of this RFP, the Contract, or both;

16.2.7 Reissue a Request for Proposals;

16.2.8 Negotiate directly with any Proposer; or

16.2.9 Provide its own vehicle towing and storage services, or contract directly, without an RRP or bids, for those services.

17. LETTER OF OBJECTION; PROCEDURES

17.1 A Proposer, who believes that any part of this RFP is discriminatory against the Proposer or precludes the Proposer from being given reasonable consideration in the procurement process, must submit a letter, clearly stating the specific objections, the areas of concern, and a proposed method for resolving the objections. The Proposer, or the person who is duly authorized to represent the Proposer, must sign the correspondence. The City must receive the letter of objection on or before 4:00 p.m., August 16, 2024. The City will not consider any verbal objection. The letter of objection must be addressed as follows and delivered to:

Glendale Police Department Traffic Bureau ATTN:

Lieutenant Tigran Topadzhikyan
131 North Isabel Street
Glendale, CA 91206-4382

17.2 Upon the City’s timely receipt of the objection letter, the City will review the Proposer’s contention(s). If the City decides that the RFP, whether in whole or in part, needs revision, the City will prepare Addenda, as described in Section 7 of this RFP.

18. HOLIDAY, WEEKEND, CITY CLOSED - EXTENSION TO NEXT

BUSINESS DAY

18.1 If the last day for performing an act under this RFP falls on a weekend, a legal holiday listed in either Municipal Code Section 3.08.010 or California’s Government Code, or a day when City Hall is closed, the period is extended to and including the next business day.

19. CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

19.1 (A) A Proposer and its subcontractors shall fully comply with Glendale Municipal Code Section 1.10.060, which places limitations on the Proposer’s and its subcontractors’ ability to make campaign contributions to certain elected City officials or candidates for elected 87 of 141

42 City office. Specifically, Section 1.10.060 prohibits:
(1) A Proposer who is awarded a contract with the City of Glendale or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council or Housing Authority― from making a contribution to a City Council member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer, when the contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more, or a combination or series of contracts having a value of $50,000 or more, in a fiscal year (July 1 – June 30) of City; and
(2) A City Council member or Housing Authority member from voting on a contract in which a Proposer (or its subcontractor) has provided a campaign contribution.
(B) Proposer acknowledges that even if Proposer’s contract for labor, materials, or both, is less than $50,000, Proposer still may be subject to the campaign contribution limitations in Municipal Code Section

1.10.060, when:
(1) Proposer and the City add additional work, services, or materials to the contract which increases the contract’s maximum cost to equal or exceed $50,000 in a fiscal year (July 1 – June 30) of City; or
(2) City or the Housing Authority awards Proposer another contract which has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more― or awards Proposer a combination or
series of contracts which have a value of $50,000 or more― in a fiscal year (July 1 – June 30) of City.
(C) In submitting a Proposal, Proposer represents and certifies that:
(1) Proposer has read and fully understands the provisions of Municipal Code Section 1.10.060;
(2) Proposer will not: (a) make a prohibited campaign contribution to an individual holding City elective office; or (b) otherwise violate Municipal Code Section 1.10.060; and
(3) Proposer shall timely complete, return, and update one or more disclosure or reporting forms that City provides.
88 of 141

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Revisions to the Public Benefits Charge (PBC) and Reallocation of 2018-2024 PBC Funds to Authorized Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency Customer Incentives.
1) Introduction of Ordinance amending Section 13.44.425 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, pertaining to the current Public Benefits Charge of

3.6% to the rate mandated by State law.
2) Resolution adopting 2.85% as the Public Benefits Charge, pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, Section 13.44.425, effective November 7, 2024.
3) Motion declaring the allocation and use of funds collected from the 0.75% increase in Public Benefits Charge inadvertently collected from July 1, 2018 through November 6, 2024 for all authorized renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand response, and energy efficiency customer incentives. 4) Resolution for the reallocation of the remaining $3,394,937 from the 2018- 24 0.75% Public Benefits Charge, plus all additional unspent PBC revenues collected therefrom through November 6, 2024, to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program” to fund energy efficiency enhancements. 5) Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $3,394,937, and all additional unspent revenues from the 2018-24 0.75% Public Benefits Charge collected through November 6, 2024, to fund energy efficiency enhancements to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program.”

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action
Approved for October 1, 2024 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Assembly Bill 1890 (AB -1890) and the California Public Utilities Code Section 385 require that municipal utilities establish a PBC equal to 2.85% of annual retail electric rate revenues to fund investments in one or more of the following areas:
•Cost-effective demand side management services to promote energy efficiency 89 of 141

28a
5 4
5 1
and energy conservation.
•New investment in renewable energy resources and technologies. •Research, development and demonstration programs.
•Services provided for low-income electricity customers, including but not limited to, targeted energy efficiency service and rate discounts.

In February 2008, GWP raised its PBC from 2.85% to 3.6% of annual electric revenues to fund solar energy incentives required by Senate Bill 1 (SB-1). SB-1 mandated new statewide expenditure requirements for solar incentive programs and required municipal utilities to offer incentives to all customer classes starting January 1, 2008, and meet certain California Energy Commission guidelines starting January 1, 2009.

Based on our share of the statewide municipal utility load at the time, GWP was required to fund up to $15.3 million of incentives over ten years through fiscal year 2017-18. At the end of that fiscal year, the 0.75% increase in the PBC rate should have been reduced back down to the state-mandated rate of 2.85%, but this was inadvertently missed by staff, and the 3.6% rate remained in place until present time. As a result, the PBC fund over-collected approximately $9.2 million between FY 2018-19 and FY 2023-24. However, $5.8 million was properly and lawfully budgeted and spent on solar incentives during the over-collection period, leaving $3.4 million of over- collected funds in the Fund.

The increase in the PBC rate was intended to fund SB-1 solar incentives, which is one of the four authorized categories. Since there are no existing solar incentive programs offered by GWP at this time, staff recommends retroactively approving the 0.75% PBC rate increase through November 6, 2024, for energy efficiency programs to help customers reduce energy usage and lower their electricity bills. These recommended actions reallocate $3.4 million of funds, plus any additional over-collections up to and including November 6, 2024, to enhance the existing “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program,” including increases in rebates for efficient “Energy Star” air conditioners, heat pumps, water heaters, electric stoves, and electric ovens that will help GWP customers transition to cleaner and more efficient technologies.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the following:
1) Introduction of Ordinance amending Section 13.44.425 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995’s current PBC of 3.6% to the rate mandated by the State law 2) Resolution adopting 2.85% as the PBC, pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 Section 13.44.425, effective November 7, 2024.
3) Motion declaring the allocation and use of over-collected funds from July 1, 2018 through October 31, 2024, for all authorized renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand response, and energy efficiency customer incentives. 90 of 141

38a
5 4
5 1
4) Resolution for the reallocation of the remaining $3,394,937 plus any additional PBC over-collections from revenues collected up to and including November 6, 2024, to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program” to fund energy efficiency enhancements, and
5) Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate $3,394,937, and any additional PBC over-collections from revenues collected up to and including November 6, 2024, to fund energy efficiency enhancements to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program.”

ANALYSIS
Since 2002, 1,539 solar photovoltaic systems were incentivized with a total nameplate capacity of 12.4 MW, totaling approx. $24.8 million in expenditures:
•~$3.7 million in expenditures between 2002 to 2007 (prior to SB-1 Mandate); •~$17.2 million in expenditures between 2008 and 2018;
•~$3.9 million in expenditures between 2019 to 2024.

Expenditures for solar programs and initiatives have totaled approximately $21.1 million since implementation of the SB-1 mandate (between 2008-24). Following the 0.75% PBC increase, $15.3 million was collected through FY 2017-18, with an additional over- collection of $9.2 million from FY 2017-18 through FY 2023-24, bringing the total collection to $24.5 million. Comparing the expenditures to the collections provides a remaining over-collection of approximately $3.4 million.

Staff recommends reallocating the $3,394,937, and any additional PBC overcollections up to and including November 6, 2024, to enhance the existing “Home Energy and Water Saving Rebates Program,” with the following rebate modifications:
•ENERGY STAR® Refrigerator/Freezer: Increase rebate from $80 (inside Glendale)/$60 (outside Glendale) to $200, regardless of purchase location. •ENERGY STAR® Room or Portable Air Conditioner: Increase rebate from $60 (inside Glendale)/$50 (outside Glendale) to $400 per unit, regardless of purchase location with total not to exceed $800.
•ENERGY STAR® Central Air or Mini-Split Air Conditioner/Heat Pump: Increase rebate from $250/Ton (inside Glendale)/$230/Ton (outside Glendale) to $500/Ton, regardless of purchase location with total not to exceed $2,500. •ENERGY STAR® Electric Heat Pump Water Heaters: Increase rebate from $525 (inside Glendale)/$500 (outside Glendale) to $1000, regardless of purchase location.
•ENERGY STAR® Ceiling Fans: Increase rebate from $30 (inside Glendale)/$25 (outside Glendale) to $100 regardless of purchase location. •Electric Range, Range/Oven Combo, or Wall Oven: Increase rebate from $220 (inside Glendale)/$200 (outside Glendale) to $400, regardless of purchase location.

These adjusted rebates will remain in effect until the over-collected funds are exhausted, at which point the original rebate amounts will be re-established. 91 of 141

48a
5 4
5 1
By increasing these rebates, staff aims to accelerate the deployment of energy efficient appliances, which will provide ongoing energy savings, bill reductions, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Also, air conditioning loads significantly contribute to GWP’s peak load during the summer, and efficient air conditioners will achieve peak-load reductions. Finally, the structure of the $400 portable and room air conditioning rebates pay for almost 100% of the units (maximum of two per household), which will help low- income and multi-family customers participate in the above benefits.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff is requesting an appropriation of an estimated $3,394,937 to fund energy efficiency enhancements to the “Home Energy and Water Savings Rebate Program” as outlined below:

The appropriation is an estimate since revenues for July 1, 2024 through November 6, 2024 are not yet finalized. Therefore, any over-collection resulting from the PBC rate between July 1, 2024 and November 6, 2024 will be added to the $3,394,937.

The ongoing impacts of re-setting the rate to 2.85% is dependent on the annual electric rate revenues collected. For FY 2024-25, it is estimated that revenues will be impacted by a decrease of approx. $1.3 million. Any shortage of revenue for FY 2024-25 will be offset by the use of fund balance.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable. The action herein is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$3,394,937 24217-2910-000 45512-2910-GWP-
0020-P0000
PL: GWP01305AN
Public Benefit
Fund Balance
92 of 141

58a
5 4
5 1
Alternative 1: Choose to not authorize the actions recommended in this report, which will result in continuing to charge GWP customers a 3.6% PBC rate, which was not previously authorized beyond December 31, 2018.

Alternative 2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Manuel Robledo - Interim General Manager - Glendale Water and Power Prepared by:

Scott K. Mellon, Assistant General Manager - Power Management Adrine Isayan, Assistant General Manager - Finance & Risk Management Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
93 of 141

1 ORDINANCE NO.____________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING SECTION 13.44.425 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, PERTAINING TO THE CURRENT PUBLIC BENEFITS CHARGE OF 3.6% TO THE RATE

MANDATED BY STATE LAW
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1890 (SB-1890) and the California Public Utilities Code Section 385 require that municipal utilities establish a public benefit charge (PBC) equal to

2.85% of annual retail electric rate revenues to fund investments in one or more of the following areas: 1) cost-effective demand side management (DSM) services to promote energy efficiency and energy conservation; 2) new investment in renewable energy resources and technologies; 3) research, development and demonstration programs; and 4) services provided for low- income electricity customers, including but not limited to, targeted energy efficiency service and rate discounts; and
WHEREAS, Glendale Water and Power Department (GWP), in response to SB-1890 has implemented a PBC since January 1, 1998; and
WHEREAS, in February 2008, GWP raised its PBC from 2.85% to 3.6% of annual electric revenues in response to Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), which mandated new solar programs and set statewide expenditure requirements for such programs requiring municipal utilities to offer incentives to all customer classes starting January 1, 2008 and to meet certain California Energy Commission guidelines starting January 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, the SB-1 portion of the PBC was to be implemented by municipal utilities for a period of ten years at which time the PBC rate containing the SB-1 portion would default back to the state mandated rate of 2.85%; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance amends the existing Section 13.44.425 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 to delete the 3.6% PBC rate and to state that the PBC rate shall be set and applied as mandated by State of California law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1. Section 13.44.425 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, regarding public benefits charge, is hereby amended to read as follows:

13.44.425 Public benefits charge.

A. Each electric rate bill prepared by Glendale Water and Power (GWP) shall include a public benefits charge. The public benefit charge imposed by this section shall be at the a rate of 3.6% in an amount set and mandated by the State of California. The PBC rate shall be applied to of the charges made for such electricity, and for any supplemental services or other associated activities directly related to and/or necessary for the provision of electricity to the service user.

B. As used in this section, the term "charges" shall apply to all services, components and items that are:

1. Necessary for or common to the receipt, use or enjoyment of electric service; or 94 of 141

2 2. Currently are or historically have been included in a single or bundled rate for electric service by a local distribution company to a class of retail customers. As used in this section, the term "charges" shall include the value of any other services, credits, property of every kind or nature, or other consideration provided by the service user in exchange for the electricity or services related to the provision of such electricity. The term "charges" shall include, but is not limited to, the following charges:

1. Energy charges;

2. Distribution or transmission charges;

3. Metering charges;

4. Stand-by, reserves, firming, ramping, voltage support, regulation, emergency, or other similar minimum charges for services;

5. Customer charges, late charges, service establishment or reestablishment charges, demand charges, fuel or other cost adjustments, power exchange charges, independent system operator (ISO) charges, stranded investment or competitive transition charges (CTC), nuclear decommissioning charges, trust transfer amounts (bond financing charges), franchise fees, franchise surcharges, annual and monthly charges, and other charges, fees or surcharges which are necessary for or common to the receipt, use or enjoyment of electric service.

C. Revenues from the public benefits charge will be retained in a separate account. The funds in this account must be used for the following purposes:

1. Cost-effective demand-side management services to promote energy efficiency and energy conservation;

2. New investments in renewable energy resources and technology consistent with existing statutes and regulations;

3. Research, development, and demonstration programs for the public interest to advance science or technology, which is not adequately provided, by competitive and regulated market;

4. Services provided to low-income electricity customers, including, but not limited to, targeted energy efficiency and rate discounts.
(Ord. 5179 § 1, 1997; Ord. 5197 § 9, 1998; Ord. 5233 § 10, 1999; Ord. 5297 § 8, 2001; Ord. 5506 § 7, 2006; Ord. 5598 § 5, 2008)
SECTION 2. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act.

The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and, therefore, an environmental review is not required under section 15060(c)(2) [the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment]; section 15060(c)(3) [the activity is not a project as defined in section 15378]; and section 15061(b)(3) [no possibility exists that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment] of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because the ordinance:

1. Has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly; and

2. Prevents changes in the environment.

SECTION 3. Severability.

This Ordinance is adopted under the authority of the Charter of the city of Glendale and State law. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase is declared invalid or otherwise void by a 95 of 141

3 court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any remaining provision hereof. In this regard the city council finds and declares that it would have adopted this measure notwithstanding any partial invalidity hereof.

SECTION 4. Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after the date of its passage.

Passed by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of _______________, 2024.
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian PhD, City Clerk of the city of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___________ was passed by a majority vote of the Council of the city of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _____________, 2024, and that the same was passed by the followed vote.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________
City Clerk
96 of 141

1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING AND SETTING THE PUBLIC BENEFITS CHARGE (PBC) IN SECTION

13.44.425 OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995 IN ACCORDANCE WITH

STATE OF CALIFORNIA PBC MANDATES
WHEREAS, Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC) Section 13.44.425, in accordance with State of California mandates, authorizes Glendale Water and Power Department (GWP) to apply a public benefits charge (PBC) to its customers’ electric charges, the funds from which must be used for: 1) cost- effective demand side management (DSM) services to promote energy efficiency and energy conservation; 2) new investment in renewable energy resources and technologies; 3) research, development and demonstration programs; and 4) services provided for low-income electricity customers, including but not limited to, targeted energy efficiency service and rate discounts; and WHEREAS, the City Council, with an ordinance adopted concurrently herewith, is amending GMC Section 13.44.425, subsection A, to implement the PBC rate in an amount set and mandated by the State of California law; and WHEREAS, the current State of California mandate calculates and sets the PBC rate at 2.85% of annual retail electric revenues.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

Pursuant to Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC), Section 13.44.425 and the State of California mandates pertaining to the public benefits charge (PBC) rate, the City Council hereby adopts and sets the PBC rate at 2.85% of the charges made for such electricity, and for any supplemental services or other associated activities directly related to and/or necessary for the provision of electricity to the service user as set forth in GMC Section 13.44.425.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2024.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk
97 of 141

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _______________ was adopted by a majority vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the ______ day of ______________________, 2024, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________
City Clerk
98 of 141

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the City Council having considered the Report dated October 1, 2024 by the Interim General Manager of Glendale Water and Power Department (GWP) relating the City’s public benefits charge (PBC) rate, hereby declares the allocation and use of the funds collected from the .75% increase in the PBC rate, from July 1, 2018 through November 6, 2024, for all authorized renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand response, and energy efficiency customer incentives.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
99 of 141

1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, REALLOCATING $3,394,937 IN REMAINING PUBLIC BENEFITS

CHARGE (PBC) FUNDS, PLUS ALL ADDITIONAL UNSPENT PBC REVENUES COLLECTED THEREFROM THROUGH NOVEMBER 6, 2024, TO THE “HOME ENERGY AND WATER SAVINGS REBATE PROGRAM” TO FUND ENERGY

EFFICIENCY ENHANCEMENTS
WHEREAS, Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (GMC) Section 13.44.425, in accordance with State of California mandates, authorizes Glendale Water and Power Department (GWP) to apply a public benefits charge (PBC) to its customers’ electric charges, the funds from which must be used for: 1) cost-effective demand side management (DSM) services to promote energy efficiency and energy conservation; 2) new investment in renewable energy resources and technologies; 3) research, development and demonstration programs; and 4) services provided for low-income electricity customers, including but not limited to, targeted energy efficiency service and rate discounts; and
WHEREAS, Glendale Water and Power Department (GWP), in response to SB- 1890 has implemented a PBC since January 1, 1998; and
WHEREAS, in February 2008, GWP raised its PBC from 2.85% to 3.6% of annual electric revenues in response to Senate Bill 1 (SB-1), which mandated new solar programs and set statewide expenditure requirements for such programs requiring municipal utilities to offer incentives to all customer classes starting January 1, 2008 and to meet certain California Energy Commission guidelines starting January 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, the SB-1 portion of the PBC was to be implemented by municipal utilities for a period of ten years at which time the PBC rate containing the SB-1 portion would default back to the state mandated rate of 2.85%; and WHEREAS, the PBC rate was not defaulted back to 2.85% in 2018 resulting in over-collection of PBC funds in the amount of approximately $9.2 million between Fiscal Years 2018-2019 and Fiscal Years 2023-2024; and
WHEREAS, GWP expended a total of $21.1 million on solar initiatives and programs from 2008 through 2024, of which $5.8 million was out of the over-collected funds, which leaves an overcollection of $3.4 million in PBC rates; and WHEREAS, the Report dated October 1, 2024 by the Interim General Manager of GWP recommends that the remaining $3,394,937 in over-collected PBC funds, plus any additional revenue therefrom through November 6, 2024, be allocated towards energy efficiency enhancements to the existing “Home Energy and Water Saving Rebates Program” to accelerate the deployment of energy efficient appliances, which will provide ongoing energy savings, bill reductions, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions air conditioning loads significantly contribute to GWP’s peak load during the summer, and efficient air conditioners will achieve peak-load reductions. Finally, the structure of the $400 portable and room air conditioning rebates pay for almost 100% of 100 of 141

2 the units (maximum of two per household), which will help low-income and multi-family customers participate in the above benefits.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

Section 1. The recitals above are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of the findings in support of this Resolution.

Section 2. The City Council hereby reallocates the remaining $3,394,937 in over-collected PBC rates, plus any additional revenue therefrom through November 6, 2024, to enhance the existing “Home Energy and Water Saving Rebates Program,” with the following rebate modifications:
•ENERGY STAR® Refrigerator/Freezer: Increase rebate from $80 (inside Glendale)/$60 (outside Glendale) to $200, regardless of purchase location •ENERGY STAR® Room or Portable Air Conditioner: Increase rebate from $60 (inside Glendale)/$50 (outside Glendale) to $400 per unit, regardless of purchase location with total not to exceed $800.
•ENERGY STAR® Central Air or Mini-Split Air Conditioner/Heat Pump: Increase rebate from $250/Ton (inside Glendale)/$230/Ton (outside Glendale) to $500/Ton, regardless of purchase location with total not to exceed $2,500. •ENERGY STAR® Electric Heat Pump Water Heaters: Increase rebate from $525 (inside Glendale)/$500 (outside Glendale) to $1000, regardless of purchase location
•ENERGY STAR® Ceiling Fans: Increase rebate from $30 (inside Glendale)/$25 (outside Glendale) to $100 regardless of purchase location •Electric Range, Range/Oven Combo, or Wall Oven: Increase rebate from $220 (inside Glendale)/$200 (outside Glendale) to $400, regardless of purchase location.

Section 3. The above adjusted rebates shall remain in effect until the over-collected funds are exhausted, at which time the original rebate amounts will be re-established.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on this ___ day of _________, 2024.
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
City Clerk
101 of 141

3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________
City Clerk
102 of 141

103 of 141

8b
24-86518

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Authorize Cooperative Agreement for Foothill Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP)
1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Glendale and the County of Los Angeles for the Foothill Boulevard TSSP
2) Resolution of appropriation to appropriate $499,800 in Measure R Local Return Funds for the Foothill Boulevard TSSP

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for October 1, 2024 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Foothill Boulevard TSSP will synchronize 26 traffic signals in the cities of Glendale, Los Angeles, La Cañada Flintridge, and the unincorporated community of La Crescenta- Montrose on Foothill Boulevard, between Lowell Avenue and Crown Avenue. Upon completion, the signalized intersections in this corridor will be fully actuated, feature components for time-based coordination, and will integrate the Los Angeles County Public Work’s Kimley-Horn Integrated Transportation System (KITS) into the Countywide Information Exchange Network (IEN).

The intent of this item is for the City Council to authorize the execution of a cooperative agreement with the County of Los Angeles for this program.

Additionally, a resolution of appropriation is needed from the Measure R Local Return Fund to fully fund Glendale’s portion of the project.
104 of 141

8b2
24-86518
5 4
7 8

RECOMMENDATION
Pass the motion authorizing execution of a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Glendale and the County of Los Angeles for the Foothill Boulevard TSSP and adopt the resolution of appropriation in the amount of $499,800 for the project.

ANALYSIS
To improve operational safety and reliability on local highways and streets, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors launched the Countywide TSSP. Since 1988, the County's Public Works Department, collaborating with numerous cities, the California Department of Transportation, and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), has been enhancing traffic signal synchronization on major roadways.

The Los Angeles County Foothill Boulevard TSSP will synchronize 26 traffic signals along the Foothill Boulevard corridor in the cities of Glendale, Los Angeles, La Cañada Flintridge, and the unincorporated community of La Crescenta-Montrose. The project aims to upgrade intersections along Foothill Boulevard, spanning from Lowell Avenue to Crown Avenue. This synchronization of traffic signals on Foothill Boulevard will reduce delays and cut vehicle emissions by decreasing idling times.

The project will also include mobility and safety improvements, such as upgrading the pedestrian signals with countdown signals, upgrading the pedestrian push buttons with touch-free Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS), installing new LED internally illuminated street name signs, upgrading the traffic controllers and cabinets, upgrading the LED vehicle traffic signal heads from 8-inches to 12-inches, and installing new video detection cameras that can detect bicyclists and count pedestrians.

The estimated total project cost for all participating agencies is $3,735,600. The City of Glendale’s participating portion is $313,200 as a local match plus $186,600 for contingency, construction engineering and inspection. The project includes installation of new traffic signal equipment at existing signalized intersections in Glendale and proposes to use existing underground conduits for new cables. The contingency amount is requested to address the potential, unforeseen need for new underground conduits infrastructure that may be required.

The following six Glendale traffic signals are part of the Foothill TSSP and shown on Exhibit 1.

1. Foothill Blvd and Lowell Ave;

2. Foothill Blvd and Boston Ave;

3. Foothill Blvd and Lauderdale Ave;

4. Foothill Blvd and Dunsmore Ave;

5. Foothill Blvd and New York Ave; and

6. Foothill Blvd and Pennsylvania Ave.

Scope of Work
a) Upgrade pedestrian signals and install pedestrian countdown heads; b) Upgrade pedestrian push buttons with touch-free APS; 105 of 141

8b3
24-86518
5 4
7 8
c) Install LED internally illuminated street name sign; d) Install retroreflective street name sign;
e) Upgrade controller cabinet;
f) Upgrade 2070 traffic controller;
g) Install video detection cameras that can detect cars and bicycles; h) Install CCTV traffic incident management camera;
i) Upgrade LED vehicle traffic signal heads to 12-inches; j) Install inductive traffic loop detectors; and
k) Rewire intersection.

Approval of the proposed motion and resolution will allow Public Works Engineering to proceed with the execution of a Cooperative Agreement (Exhibit 2) with the County of Los Angeles. The County of Los Angeles is the public entity that will be managing the construction contract.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The Foothill Boulevard TSSP will benefit the community in the following ways: creating more livable communities, improving safety for all users, encouraging multi-modal transportation, reducing fuel consumption and vehicle emission, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and enhancing air quality.

Project information can be found at the Los Angeles County Public Works website (https://pw.lacounty.gov/GIS/ProjectsMap/Home/iKGoogleStreetView?project_ID=TSM0 010319&printable=1). The website introduces the public to the project and to the project team, explains the scope of work, and provides the public with staff contact information for questions, discussion, and/or input.

The Public Works Department will also include the Foothill Boulevard TSSP project information on the City’s website to supplement the Los Angeles County Public Works project website.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Foothill Boulevard TSSP will cost up to $499,800, which was not included as a part of the FY 2024-25 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting an appropriation of $499,800 from the Measure R Local Return Fund balance. The appropriation request is outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account String) Funding Source
$499,800 GL: 24212-2540-
PWD-0000
GL: 52100-2540-
PWD-0020-P0000
PL: PWD01303AN
Measure R Local
Return Fund
106 of 141

8b4
24-86518
5 4
7 8

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301(c) because it provides for the minor alteration of existing facilities involving negligible or no expansion of an existing or former use.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not approve the attached motion authorizing a cooperative agreement with Los Angeles County or the resolution of appropriation. This alternative will not allow the City of Glendale to be part of the County’s TSSP. The traffic signals on Foothill Blvd between Lowell Ave and Pennsylvania will not be improved and will not benefit from the County’s TSSP program.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Interim Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Pastor Casanova, T.E., Principal Traffic Engineer
Arek Harmandayan, T.E., Senior Traffic Engineer
Tommy Chow, T.E., Project Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Foothill Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Program – Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Cooperative Agreement
107 of 141

8b
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ,
seconded by Council Member __, that the
Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Glendale and the County of Los Angeles for the Foothill Boulevard Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP), subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, in the amount of $313,200 plus $186,600 for Contingency and Construction Engineering/Inspection, as recommended in the staff report of the Director of Public Works dated October 1, 2024.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________
City Clerk
108 of 141

109 of 141

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.
504-D6
1 LOWELL AVENUE TO CROWN AVENUE
____----

SIERRA ANTELOPE
CANYON
HUGHES

FOOT LINCOLN

DRY CANYON

RESERVOIR
MULH

KER DEC
OL
FAIRMONTRES. RD.

LAND

MULHOLLAND
SANTA
RES.

STONE
CANYON
HY.

BLVD.

LAS

VIRGENES
SANTA
MARINA
BAY
MONICA
RES.

ENCINO

VENTURA

CHATSWORTH
F. C. BASIN
RD.

RES.

SEPULVEDA

DEL REY
RD.

RD.

KANAN
RD.

HY.

PACIFIC

DUME KANAN
MALIBU
CANYON
HY.

RD.

CANYON
DIEGO
COAST

TOPANGA

SANTA FE

SPRINGS
SO. EL
MONTE

BURBANK

LOS ANGELES

PICO RIVERA

GLENDALE

COMMERCE

MONTEBELLO
PARK

ROSEMEAD

TEMPLE CITY

EL MONTE
BELL

GARDENS
VERNON

LA MIRADA

CERRITOS
BELL
CUDAHY
DOWNEY

PARAMOUNT
LONG
BEACH
EL

SEGUNDO

MAYWOOD

SOUTH GATE

CULVER CITY

HUNTINGTON PARK

BEVERLY HILLS

INGLEWOOD

CLAREMONT
DIMAS

GLENDORA
SAN

WEST COVINA
COVINA
POMONA
WALNUT

GABRIEL

CONTROLCOUNTY
SAN

DISTRICT
COUNTY

MOUNTAINS
COUNTY
COUNTY

MONROVIA

ARCADIA
SO. PASADENA

SIERRA MADRE

SAN GABRIEL

MONTEREY

WHITTIER

ALHAMBRA

BERNARDINO

BRADBURY
FWY. SAN

PASADENA

SAN MARINO
DUARTE
AZUSA

BELLFLOWER
E A
P A
F I
N

PALOS VERDES

ESTATES

SAN FERNANDO

HERMOSA BEACH
MONICA

VENTURA
HILLS
SANTA
O C
C I
COUNTY
C

ANGELES
ST.E
ST.E
J
G
ST. E
AVE. P
140TH
HY.

MANHATTAN BEACH
BEACH

ROLLING

REDONDO

GARDENA

TORRANCE

HAWTHORNE

LAWNDALE

HAWAIIAN

GARDENS

LAKEWOOD

NORWALKLYNWOOD

COMPTON
ORANGE
CARSON
LOMITA
.

VENTURA
COUNTY
KERN
COUNTY
HIDDEN

LOS ANGELES
LOS
SIGNAL
HILL

HILLS ESTATES
HILLS

IRWINDALE

BALDWIN PARK

INDUSTRY

LA PUENTE
.

BOUNDARY

COUNTY SAN
.

FLOOD

BERNARDINO

PALMDALE
FWY.

FWY.

HOLLYWOOD
SAN
BLVD.

BLVD.

FWY.

GOLDEN

HOLLYWOOD
DAM
DR.

UPPER
STATE

FRANKLIN
CANYON RES.

LOWER

LAKEWOOD
FWY.

SAN

GABRIELARTESIA
FWY.

HY.

FWY.

GLENDALE
BLVD.

MONICA
MANCHESTER BLVD.

PASADENA

FIRESTONE

SANTA ANA
FWY.

BLVD.

GLENDORA
BLVD.

SANTA ANITA
IEN
HACBLVD.

DA
RES.

FOOTHILL
MT. WILSON
RES.

BLVD.

COLORADO DR.HUNTINGTON
LEGG

ANGELES
CREST HY.

MT. FWY.

RES.

HANSEN
FWY.

FWY.

ROSEMEAD
BLVD.

LAKE
POMONA
RIVER
FWY.

FWY.

BERNARDINO
BLVD.

PYRAMID

RESERVOIR

LANCASTER
GOLDEN
FWY.

CASTAIC

FRANCISQUITO
LAKE
AVENUE
RD
LAKE

LANCASTER
QUAIL
LAKE
ST. W
260TH
RES.

BOUQUET
HUGHES

HENRY MAYO
SIMI

MULHOLLAND
FWY.

STATE
VALLEY

FERNANDOSAN
RD.

SAN
RES.

DR.

FWY.

SAN FERNANDO

ARTESIA
SLOUGH
COAST

PACIFIC
BEACH

SEPULVEDA
PEDRO
SAN
SAN
LONG
BAY
DIEGO
ISLAND FWY.

BIXBY
HARBOR

TERMINAL
SAN
RD.RD.

ANGELES
RD.

TWEEDY

LAKECANYON
PINE

COGSWELL

RESERVOIR
BLVD.

SAWPIT CANYON
RD.

AVE.

FOOTHILL
CANYON
170THRD
LAKES
LAKE
ST. W
ST. W
LAKE

ELIZABETH
RD.

ELIZABETH
AVENUE
D
RES.

MUNZ
110TH

FAIRMONT
AVENUE
P

PALMDALE
PEAR
47THUNA
SOM

RESERVOIR
LAKE
90TH
AVENUE
HY.

ST.E
HY.

BLOS

LITTLE ROCK

RESERVOIR
RD.

CREEK
PINES
HY.

BIG

CRYSTAL

ROCKBIG
ST. E
170TH

ANTELOPE
O
BLVD.

HY.
165TH
RD
LAKE
VALLEY
ST.W
M
FWY.

AVENUE
AVENUE
60TH
I
ST.E
ST.E
LAKE
HY.

AVENUE
HY.

E
ST E

PALMDALE

BIG DALTON
RES.

GABRIELSAN

SAN GABRIEL

RESERVOIR
FWY.

ALOSTA AVE.

THOMPSON
CREEK
RES.

RES.

RD.

CANYON
RES.

CRYSTAL

SAN DIMAS
BLVD.

DIAMOND BAR
FWY.

ORANGE
FWY.

FWY.

PUDDINGSTONE
RES.

FOOTHILL
BLVD.

LIVE OAK
CORONA
CUT-OFF RD.

BREA CYN.

BOUQUET CANYON RES.

BIG TUJUNGA
SPUNKY
CANYON
CANYON
SAND

GLEASON
RD.

ANGELES
HY.

CREST
FOREST
VALLEY
CYN. RD.

RD.

RD.
10 TH
SIERRA

RESERVOIR
50TH

PEARBLOSSOM

FORT TEJON

ANTELOPE
30TH
HILL

PACOIMA
LITTLE

TUJUNGA
FWY.

BIG TUJUNGA
RES.

AVENUE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

LOWELL AVENUE TO CROWN AVENUE
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010319 PCA NO. X752730601

FOOTHILL BOULEVARD

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT
CADD PROJECT FILE NAMECHECKER DESIGNER DRAFTER 1" - 20'ASSISTANT DEPUTY DIRECTOR D.YEH
SHEET OFT.S.SCALEREVISIONS

DATE DESCRIPTIONMARK

LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
DATE
DATE

RECOMMENDED
BY:

BY:

APPROVED

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

MARK PESTRELLA, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
D.YEH H. NGUYEN
DATEBY:

PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010319 PCA NO. X752730601 100% COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I/S OF 26

FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TSSP

TRAFFIC SIGNAL SKETCH

FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
T.G.
19 Monterey Park, California 91754
1100 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 201
Tel: (323) 260-4703 Fax: (323) 260-4705
A C
N/A:

PLAN
Title Sheet.dwg
09/21/2023
ENDED
D

LOS ANGELES COUNT

LLA DIR
9/22/2023

TANT DEPUTY DDDDDDDDDDDDDDIRECTORIRIRECTOIRECTOTOOOIIRECTOOOOIRECTOIIRECTOOTOOIRIR OOOOII TTOTOOOI OOIIR TRECTCTTTOR CTTTT D

MARK PESTPESTPPPEPEPPPPPESTTTPESTTPPPESTPPPEE TTTPPPPPESSTTTTTTTRERERRRRRRRRRERRRRRR D

MARK PESTPPPPEE RE
9/26/23
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010319
PRIME CONTRACTOR LICENSE REQUIRED: CLASS A AND C10
EXHIBIT 1: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM - VICINITY MAP 110 of 141

Page 1 of 10 ends

A G R E E M E N T

THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF GLENDALE, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, (hereinafter referred to as CITY), and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as COUNTY):

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, to assist in the traffic flow, CITY , the City of Los Angeles, the City of La Cañada Flintridge, and COUNTY desire to modify and synchronize the traffic signals along Foothill Boulevard from Lowell Avenue to Crown Avenue, a portion of which is within CITY, and which work is hereinafter referred to as PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements are jurisdictionally shared between CITY, the City of Los Angeles , the City of La Cañada Flintridge , and COUNTY, and a separate agreement between the City of La Cañada Flintridge and COUNTY is being executed covering the portions of PROJECT within the City of La Cañada Flintridge’s jurisdiction; and

WHEREAS, PROJECT is of general interest to CITY, the City of Los Angeles, the City of La Cañada Flintridge, and COUNTY; and

WHEREAS, for the purpose of providing funding for PROJECT, COUNTY, as lead agency, on December 1, 2017, entered into an amended Memorandum of Understanding No. 920000000F7306 (MOU) with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro); and
WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to utilize and share with CITY the funding provided for in COUNTY/Metro MOU 920000000 F7306 to finance a portion of COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, COST OF PROJECT includes the COST OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, and COST OF CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION; and
WHEREAS, the total COST OF PROJECT is currently estimated to be Three Million Seven Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand S ix Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3,735,600.00); and

WHEREAS, under the MOU, Metro will provide to COUNTY a grant (GRANT) of up to a maximum of Two Million Five Hundred Twenty-Eight Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($2,528,300.00) for PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, allocation of the Metro grant is currently estimated to be, One Million Two Hundred Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,206,300.00) towards CITY’S jurisdictional share, One Million Thirty-Two EXHIBIT 2
111 of 141

Page 2 of 10 ends

Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,032,500.00) towards COUNTY's jurisdictional share, Two Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($ 234,600.00) towards the City of La Cañada Flintridge’s jurisdictional share, and Fifty -Four Thousand Nine Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($ 54,900.00) towards the City of Los Angeles jurisdictional share; and

WHEREAS, CITY is willing to finance its jurisdictional share of COST OF PROJECT currently estimated to be One Million Seven Hundred Forty-Nine Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,749, 300.00) by claiming its share of COUNTY/Metro grant funds, currently estimated to be One Million Two Hundred Six Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($ 1,206,300.00) and contributing other CITY funds in the amount of Three Hundred Thirteen Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($313,200.00) to finance a portion of the COST OF PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to contribute Two Hundred Twenty -Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($229,800.00) to finance a portion of CITY’s COST OF PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, CITY’S estimated share is the sum of actual quantities of construction contract items utilized within CITY jurisdiction less the grant amount for grant eligible items plus thirty (30) percent of that for PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING cost, twenty (20) percent of that for CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION cost, twenty (20) percent of that for contingencies , and three and a half (3.5) percent of combined costs of PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING and CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION towards contract CITY liability trust fund altogether estimated to be One Million Seven Hundred Forty-Nine Thousand Three Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,749,300.00); and

WHEREAS, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING involves the timing parameters for the general operation of a traffic signal, which typically include, but is not limited to , defining the phases, attributes and timing values for each permitted phase, pedestrian movement, and assigning detection; and

WHEREAS, COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING involves the timing parameters that allow multiple traffic signals to be synchronized with each other, which typically include defining coordination cycle lengths, offsets and time of day operations for each traffic signal coordination plan; and

WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to be responsible to perform or cause to be performed the PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING , solicitation of construction bids and award of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, and CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION for PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to be responsible to perform or cause to be performed the equipment and system testing and develop and implement the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for PROJECT; and
112 of 141

Page 3 of 10 ends

WHEREAS, such a proposal is authorized and provided for by the provisions of Sections 6500 and 23004, et seq., of the Government Code and Sections 1685 and 1803 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by CITY and COUNTY and of the promises herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:

(1) DEFINITIONS:

a. The term JURISDICTION, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall be defined as the area within the jurisdictional boundary of each governmental entity party to this AGREEMENT.

b. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of environmental findings and approvals/permits; design survey; soils report; traffic index and geotechnical investigation; preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimates; right -of-way engineering; utility engineering; and all other necessary work prior to advertising of PROJECT for construction bids.

c. COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the actual payments to the construction contractor(s) for PROJECT and the total of all payments to utility companies or contractor(s) for the relocation of facilities necessary for the construction of PROJECT, and the cost of any additional unforeseen work that is necessary for the construction of PROJECT.

d. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION as referred to in this
AGREEMENT shall consist of construction contract administration, construction inspection, materials testing, construction survey, traffic detour, signing and striping, construction engineering, utility rel ocation and coordination matters, changes and modifications of plans and specifications for PROJECT necessitated by unforeseen or unforeseeable field conditions encountered during construction of PROJECT, construction contingencies, and all other necessary work after advertising of PROJECT for construction bids to cause PROJECT to be constructed in accordance with said plans and specifications approved by CITY and COUNTY.

e. COST OF PROJECT, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT and costs of

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING, and
COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for traffic signals within PROJECT limits, right-of-way acquisition and clearance matters, and all other work and materials necessary to construct PROJECT in accordance with the approved plans and shall include currently effective 113 of 141

Page 4 of 10 ends

percentages added to total salaries, wages, and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration, and depreciation in connection with any or all of the aforementioned items.

f. Completion of PROJECT as referred to in this AGREEMENT shall be defined as the date of field acceptance of construction of PROJECT by COUNTY and an electronic notification to CITY'S City Manager that the improvements within CITY'S JURISDICTION are completed and transferred to CITY for purpose of operation and maintenance.

(2) CITY AGREES:

a. To finance CITY’S share of COST OF PROJECT, the actual amount of which is to be determined by a final accounting, pursuant to paragraph (4) c., below.

b. To deposit with COUNTY, following execution of this AGREEMENT and upon demand by COUNTY, CITY funds in the amount of Three Hundred Thirteen Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($ 313,200.00) hereinafter referred as CITY’S PAYMENT. Said demand will consist of a billing invoice prepared by COUNTY and delivered to CITY.

c. To obtain and grant to COUNTY any necessary temporary right of way within CITY for the construction of PROJECT at no cost to COUNTY.

d. To issue to COUNTY a no -fee permit(s) authorizing COUNTY to construct those portions of PROJECT with CITY highway right of way on condition t hat the COUNTY' S contractor meets the insurance requirements as required and approved by the CITY’S Risk Manager.

e. To cooperate with COUNTY in conducting negotiations with and, where appropriate, issue notices to public utilities and owners of substructure and overhead facilities regarding the relocation, removal, operation, and maintenance of all surface and undergrou nd utilities and facilities, structures, and transportation services, which interfere with the proposed construction. Where utilities have been installed in CITY streets or on CITY property, CITY will provide the necessary right of way for the relocation of those utilities and facilities that interfere with the construction of PROJECT. CITY will take all necessary steps to assist COUNTY in utilizing the CITY’S prior rights over utility companies and owners of substructure and overhead facilities and execute any necessary documentation to temporarily grant, transfer or assign such prior rights to the COUNTY when necessary for the COUNTY to construct and complete the PROJECT. All such prior rights shall revert to the CITY upon completion of the PROJECT.

f. To authorize COUNTY to represent CITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT, in negotiations pertaining to the advertisement of 114 of 141

Page 5 of 10 ends

PROJECT for construction bids, award, and administration of the construction contract and in all things necessary and proper to complete PROJECT.

g. Upon completion of PROJECT: ( 1) to accept full and complete ownership of, and responsibility for, the PROJECT; and (2) to maintain in good condition and at CITY expense all improvements constructed as part of PROJECT within CITY'S JURISDICTION, including the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and the COORDINATION TRAFFIC
SIGNAL TIMING to support synchronization of traffic signals on Foothill Boulevard.

(3) COUNTY AGREES:

a. To perform or cause to be performed the preliminary engineering, contract administration, construction inspection and engineering, utility engineering and relocation, traffic detour, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION TIMING, and final signing and striping for PROJECT.

b. To act as l ead agency, prepare the necessary environmental documents, and make the required environmental findings for PROJECT pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

c. To contribute toward CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT, currently estimated to be Two Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($229,800.00).

d. To submit an invoice to CITY in the amount of Three Hundred Thirteen Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3 13,200.00) upon adoption of this AGREEMENT by COUNTY.

e. To obtain CITY'S approval of plans for PROJECT prior to advertising for construction bids.

f. To advertise PROJECT for construction bids, to award and to administer the construction contract, and to act on behalf of CITY in all negotiations pertaining thereto.

g. To administer the design and construction of PROJECT in accordance with all regulations and requirements of Metro relating to the expenditure of Proposition C Local Return funds and Proposition C Twenty -five Percent (25%) Discretionary funds and Memorandum of Understanding No. 920000000F7306 between COUNTY and Metro. COUNTY'S
records for PROJECT shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by COUNTY and Metro, or any of their duly authorized representatives, and shall be retained by COU NTY for a period of not 115 of 141

Page 6 of 10 ends

less than seven (7) years after final payment to contractor(s) for PROJECT.

h. To ensure that CITY and all officers and employees of CITY are named as additional insured parties under the construction contractor's(s') Contractor's General Liability and automobile insurance policies.

i. To furnish to CITY, within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days after final Board acceptance of PROJECT, a final accounting of the actual CITY’S share of COST OF PROJECT including an itemization of actual unit costs and actual contract quantities , as specified in paragraph (3) a., above.

j. To perform or cause to be performed the equipment and system testing and to develop and implement the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for the PROJECT.

(4) IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

a. The financial obligations of COUNTY pursuant to this AGREEMENT are conditional upon COUNTY obtaining reimbursement from M etro pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding No. 920000000 F7306 between COUNTY and Metro. If COUNTY and/or Metro fails to provide its financial contribution, then COUNTY shall refund CITY' S payment within ninety (90) calendar days after notice from Metro to COUNTY that Metro funds are not available.

b. The final accounting of the actual total COST OF PROJECT shall allocate said total cost between CITY and COUNTY based on the previously agreed upon improvements and/or work completed. Thus, the cost of all work or improvements (including all engineering, administration, and all other costs incidental to PROJECT work) , previously agreed upon as CITY’S share of the COST OF PROJECT, shall be borne by CITY. The cost of all work or improvements (including all engineering, administration, and all other costs incidental to PROJECT work), previously agreed upon as COUNTY’S share of the COST OF PROJECT, shall be borne by COUNTY.

c. That if at final accounting CITY’S share of COST OF PROJECT exceeds CITY’S PAYMENT, as set forth in paragraph (2) a., above, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the additional amount upon demand. Said demand shall consist of a billing invoice prepared by COUNTY. Conversely, if CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT is less than CITY'S PAYMENT, COUNTY shall refund the difference to CITY without further action by CITY.

d. That if CITY'S PAYMENT, as set forth in paragraph ( 2) a., above is not delivered to COUNTY office, which is described on the billing invoice 116 of 141

Page 7 of 10 ends

prepared by COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice, notwithstanding the provisions of Government Code Section 907, COUNTY may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of CITY on deposit with COUNTY after giving notice to CITY of COUNTY'S intention to do so.

e. CITY shall review the final accounting invoice prepared by COUNTY and report in writing any discrepancies to COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice. Undisputed charges shall be paid by CITY to COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice. COUNTY shall review all disputed charges and submit a written justification detailing the basis for those charges within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S written report. CITY shall then make payment of the previously disputed charges or submit justification for nonpayment within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of COUNTY’S written justification.

f. COUNTY at any time may, at its sole discretion, designate an alternative payment mailing address and an alternative schedule for payment of CITY funds if applicable. CITY shall be notified of such changes by invoice prepared by COUNTY and delivered to CITY.

g. During construction of PROJECT, COUNTY shall furnish an inspector or other representative to perform the functions of an inspector. CITY may also furnish, at no cost to COUNTY, an inspector or other representative to inspect construction of the PROJECT. CITY shall have no obligation to inspect the PROJECT and no liability shall be attributable as a result of CITY'S inspection or failure to inspect. Said inspectors shall cooperate and consult with each other, but the orders of COUNTY inspector to the contractor or any other person in charge of construction shall prevail and be final, and COUNTY inspector shall be responsible for the proper inspection of PROJECT as needed.

h. This AGREEMENT may be amended or modified only by mutual written consent of COUNTY and CITY. Amendments and modifications of a nonmaterial nature may be made by the mutual written consent of the Parties.

i. Any correspondence, communication, or contact concerning this AGREEMENT shall be directed to the following:

CITY: Mr. Daniel Hernandez
Interim Director of Public Works
City of Glendale
633 E. Broadway, Room 209
Glendale, CA 91206
117 of 141

Page 8 of 10 ends

COUNTY: Mr. Mark Pestrella
Director of Public Works
Los Angeles County Public Works
P.O. Box 1460
Alhambra, CA 91802-1460

j. COUNTY and CITY acknowledge and recognize that the improvements contemplated by this AGREEMENT provide significant regional and local benefits with respect to reducing traffic congestion. COUNTY and CITY further acknowledge and recognize that the cost of defending claims and lawsuit arising from the improvements contemplated by this AGREEMENT is paid for by public monies and both P arties share an interest in reducing the amount of public monies spent on defending claims and lawsuits where possible without prejudicing their respective defenses.

k. In the event that a claim lawsuit is brought against COUNTY and CITY based on the allegation that the design, construction, maintenance, or operation of the improvements constructed under this AGREEMENT proximately caused injuries or damage, COUNTY and CIT Y agree to cooperate as much as possible with respect to defending the claim or lawsuit without causing prejudice to their respective defenses to the claim or lawsuit. Upon receipt of the claim or lawsuit, the COUNTY and CITY, through their respective agents if appropriate, shall promptly investigate the matter. COUNTY and CITY shall then meet and confer promptly regarding whether a joint defense is appropriate or if one Party should tender its defense and indemnification to the other Party.

l. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to, assumed by, or determined to be the responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. Where liability for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) is sought to be imposed under Section 830, et seq., of the Government Code for a dangerous condition of property owned by or under the control of CITY, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify, and hold COUNTY harmless from any and all liability arising from such dangerous condition.

118 of 141

Page 9 of 10 ends

m. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee of CITY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined t o be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT.

n. It is understood and agreed that the provisions of Assumption of Liability Agreement No. 32058 between CITY and COUNTY, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and currently in effect, are inapplicable to this AGREEMENT.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
119 of 141

Page 10 of 10 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, by the CITY OF GLENDALE on , 2024, and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on , 2024.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

By________________________
Director of Public Works

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON
County Counsel

By______________________
Deputy

CITY OF GLENDALE

By________________________
City Manager

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By __________________________ By________________________ City Clerk City Attorney

SP:\TSM\TRA\TSSP/2013 Call/GW/Foothill TSSP/8 Cost Estimate/Funding Agreements 120 of 141

5 5
3 1

AGENDA ITEM

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Report: Appointments to Fill Vacancies on Various Agencies 1) Motion designating a voting delegate and alternate representative(s) for the 2024 League of California Cities Conference
2) Motion appointing an individual to serve as an alternate on the Arroyo Verdugo Communities JPA
3) Motion appointing an individual to serve as an alternate on the Burbank-Glendale- Pasadena Regional Housing Trust
4) Motion appointing two individuals to serve as a primary and alternate on California Contract Cities Association (CCCA)
5) Motion appointing two individuals to serve as a primary and alternate on Independent Cities Association (ICA)

COUNCIL ACTION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report is in response to City Council’s direction the July 16, 2024, meeting for information on vacancies and attendance records for external boards and commissions.

The City of Glendale is actively engaged with various public agencies, joint powers authorities, and committees, with City Council members representing the city on many of these boards. This report identifies five bodies with open positions:

1. League of California Cities (Annual Conference – General Assembly)

2. Arroyo Verdugo Communities JPA

3. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Regional Housing Trust

4. California Contract Cities Association (CCCA)

5. Independent Cities Association (ICA)
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for10/1/2024 calendar
121 of 141

2 RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council make appointments and designate alternates to vacant external Board/Commission/Agency seats.

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The City of Glendale is a member agency to several public agencies, boards, joint powers authorities, associations and/or committees. In most cases, Glendale City Council members serve on the boards of these entities. In some cases, the appointment requires a formal appointment made by the City Council, while others are made through the rules and bylaws of the appointing agency. Currently, there are eighteen organizations and governing bodies outside of the City. These are noted in detail in Exhibit 1.

Currently, the following bodies have vacant seats:

1. League of California Cities (Annual Conference – General Assembly) Organization’s Purpose: The League of California Cities is an association that advocates for the interests of California's cities, promoting local control and providing a unified voice for municipalities on issues affecting governance, legislation, and public policy.

The City Council must designate a voting delegate by council action for the Annual Conference General Assembly, where the delegate will represent Glendale in shaping Cal- Cities policies. Each city has one voting delegate who at the General Assembly, will play a direct role in advocating for local decision-making and influencing statewide policy.

Meetings: October 16 to 18, 2024 (annual conference)
Meeting Location: Long Beach, CA
Current Opening(s):
•Voting Delegate
•Alternate Representative(s)

2. Arroyo Verdugo Communities JPA
Organization’s Purpose: The Arroyo Verdugo Communities Joint Powers Authority was established to formally manage fiduciary matters and mutual concerns for member agencies, particularly in response to Metro Measure M funding.

Meetings: Two per year (in February and July)
Meeting Location: Pasadena City Hall
Current Opening(s):
•Primary: Dan Brotman
122 of 141

3 •Alternate: Vacant

3. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Regional Housing Trust
Organization’s Purpose: The Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Regional Housing Trust was created to fund housing to assist families with extremely low, very low, low, and moderate incomes and homeless individuals.

Meetings: Four to Six per year
Meeting Location: Glendale City Hall
Current Opening(s):
•Primary: Dan Brotman
•Alternate: Vacant

4. California Contract Cities Association (CCCA)
Organization’s Purpose: The California Contract Cities Association exists to provide education, advocacy, networking, and access to resources that empower local elected officials to better serve their communities.

Meetings: Monthly
Meeting Location: Alternating locations
Current Opening(s):
•Primary: Vacant
•Alternate: Vacant

5. Independent Cities Association (ICA)
Organization’s Purpose: The Independent Cities Association (ICA) is a nonprofit organization supporting nearly 40 Southern California cities by focusing on public safety, economic development, infrastructure, and intergovernmental collaboration through seminars and advocacy efforts.

Meetings: Monthly
Meeting Location: Online/Zoom
Current Opening(s):
•Primary: Vacant
•Alternate: Vacant
123 of 141

4 ATTENDANCE RECORD
The City Council directed staff to prepare a report with current council members' attendance on external boards and commissions, emphasizing the need for active participation. Exhibit 2 includes a list of the external boards and commissions with attendance record from June 2023 to present time.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
N/A

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1) Council may direct staff to conduct additional research to provide to Council. 2) Council may decide to not appoint primary and/or alternates to the specified boards/commissions. The seats will continue to remain vacant, and Glendale’s voice will not be included in Board/Committee discussions.
3) Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: External Boards/Commissions/Agencies List
Exhibit 2: Attendance Report

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
Prepared by:

Elena Bolbolian, Chief Innovation Office
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
124 of 141

5 125 of 141

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale, California hereby designates the following individuals as the voting delegate and alternates for the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual Conference and the annual business meeting to be held at the Annual Conference from October 16 to 18, 2024:

VOTING DELEGATE: ___________________
ALTERNATE VOTING DELEGATE: __________________

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
126 of 141

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that Councilmember ___________ is hereby selected and appointed as Glendale’s alternate representative to the Arroyo Verdugo Communities Joint Powers Authority Governing Board until either a successor is appointed or until Councilmember _____________ no longer serves on the Glendale City Council.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
127 of 141

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that Councilmember ___________ is hereby selected and appointed as Glendale’s alternate representative to the Burbank Glendale Pasadena Regional Housing Trust until March 27, 2025.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
128 of 141

BolbMOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale, California hereby designates Councilmember _______________ as Glendale’s Member on the Board of Directors of the California Contract Cities Association through _____________________ and Councilmember ________________ as its Alternate Member. The Primary Member and Alternate shall serve until the end of his or her Council term, or upon resignation, or until the Council appoints a replacement.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
129 of 141

sMOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby selects and appoints Councilmember ___________________ to the Independent Cities Association’s (ICA’s) Board of Directors and Councilmember __________________ as its Alternate to the ICA Board of Directors. Councilmember ______________________ and Councilmember _________________ shall serve until the end of their terms on Council. The Primary Member and Alternate shall serve until the end of his or her Council term, or upon resignation, or until the Council appoints a replacement.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
130 of 141

External Boards and Commissions List
Committee/Agency/Board Appointee Must Be
Elected? Alternate Title Appointment Made By Length of Term Term Period Arroyo Verdugo Communities JPA Dan Brotman Yes
Vacant; Alternate
can be designated
at anytime
Member, Arroyo Verdugo
Communities Joint Powers Authority City Council At the discretion of the City Council
Until such time that the
representative no longer
wishes to serve or Council
replaces. July 1st, term for
Chair and Vice Chair
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Ara Najarian No N/A Secretary & Interim Treasurer-
Member of the Burbank-Glendale-
Pasadena Airport Authority.

Member, Executive Committee &
the Legal, Government &
Environmental Affairs Committee.

By Motion: In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement amongst the cities of Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena (Section 2A), the respective governing bodies (City Councils) shall appoint three members to the Commission
Four year term May 5, 2021 - May 31,
2025
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority
Elen Asatryan (finishing
Paula Devine's 4-year
term)
No N/A
Commissioner-Member of the
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport
Authority

Member of the Operations and
Development Committee
By Motion: In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement amongst the cities of Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena (Section 2A), the respective governing bodies (City Councils) shall appoint three members to the Commission
Four year term May 7, 2024 - May 31,
2025
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Frank Quintero No N/A Commissioner - Member of the
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport
Authority
By Motion: In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement amongst the cities of Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena (Section 2A), the respective governing bodies (City Councils) shall appoint three members to the Commission
Four year term Aug 27, 2019 - May 31,
2025
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Regional Housing
Trust Dan Brotman Yes Vacant Director City Council Two year term March 27, 2023 - March 27, 2025
California Contract Cities Association Vacant No Vacant Board Member/Alternate Board Member City Council Council discretion Council discretion City/Glendale Unified School District (GUSD) Mayor &
Mayor Pro Tem Yes One can be an
alternate to another
Elected official representatives from
the City of Glendale (2 seats)
Appointment assigned to the Mayor & Mayor Pro Tem of that specific month No set term N/A
Glendale Civic Leaders Round Table (GLRT) Mayor &
Mayor Pro Tem Yes One can be an
alternate to another
Elected official representatives from
the City of Glendale (2 seats)
Appointment assigned to the Mayor & Mayor Pro Tem of that specific month No set term N/A
Greater Los Angeles County Vector Control District
Board Stephen Ryfle No N/A Member, Board Member
Education & Publicity City Council Four Year term January 1, 2024 - December 31, 2027
Independent Cities Association (ICA) Vacant Yes Vacant Board Director ICA votes to approve a City's seat on the Board of Directors.

The Mayor or City Manager will write a letter to the ICA about the appointee and the Board will vote to accept the appointment.

Until the expiration of the elected officials
term or until a new appointee is appointed
by the city.

At the end of Council term
or resignation of seat
Upper Los Angeles River and Tributaries Working
Group (AB 466 - Section 33220 of Public Resources
Code)
Chisom Obegolu No Mayor Representative
Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, in consultation w/the conservancy and to the extent they wish to consult, the LA County Board of Supervisors and the City of LA
Until the completion of project Until the completion of project
League of California Cities' VARIOUS Policy
Committees
No Councilmembers
currently on Committees No N/A Committee Member Application Process One Year Term Annual

Page 1 of 3 ends

Updated
131 of 141

External Boards and Commissions List
Committee/Agency/Board Appointee Must Be
Elected? Alternate Title Appointment Made By Length of Term Term Period League of California Cities, General Assembly Vacant Yes Vacant Voting Delegate and Voting Alternate
By Motion: Council makes the Appointment each year.

Delegate and Alternate selection is generally reserved for the Mayor and Mayor Pro-tem as assumed delegates. If they are not attending the conference, the opportunity is presented to any other member who will attend. All selections are made via a staff report and resolution of the Council.

N/A (appointment is only for the Annual
General Assembly meeting)
N/A (appointment is only
for the Annual General
Assembly meeting)
League of California Cities, LA County Division,
City Selection Committee Mayor Yes N/A Committee Member City Council motion; Mayor is an automatic appointment Term of office coincides with Mayor term
Term of office coincides
with Mayor term
Los Angeles County City Selection Committee -
North
County/ San Fernando Valley Sector of MTA
Mayor Yes City Council
Members N/A Committee meets to nominate candidate for MTA Board of Directors N/A Term of office coincides
with Mayor's term
Metro San Fernando Valley Service Council Myung Soo Seok No No Member Two seats, shared by Glendale, Burbank and San Fernando.

The 3 cities come to an agreement on the candidate. Eligibility includes someone who works, lives in or represents one of the 3 cities.

Three Year Term July 1, 2024-June 30, 2027
Metrolink, Southern California Regional Rail
Authority Ara Najarian No Walter Allen Member, Board of Directors Chair of MTA No term limits. The chair of MTA
appoints and the rep serves as long as they
are on the MTA Board
N/A
Metropolitan Transportation Authority/ MTA Ara Najarian Yes N/A Member, Board of Directors Step 1: Nomination made by the LA County City Selection Committee- North County/ San Fernando Valley Sector
Step 2: Voted by the League of California Cities, LA County Division, City Selection Committee
Four year term 12/2020-12/2024
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Ardy Kassakhian No N/A Member, Board of Directors
Committees: - Legal & Claims
(L&C)
- Real Property & Asset
Management Committee
City Council motion
Under the MWD Act, City Council has
the discretion to appoint a Director to the
MWD
Board for either an indefinite term, a four-
year term which will expire on December
31 of
even-numbered years, or for any other
term which the Council deems appropriate
(Sections 51 and 54).

May 5, 2020 - December
31, 2024
San Fernando Valley Council of Governments Elen Asatryan Delegate- Yes
Alternate: No; must
be full-time staff
person
John Takhtalian Member, Board of Directors By Motion: City Council appoints and selects a Director and an alternate At the discretion of the City Council.

Appointed by Glendale City
Council on 7/16/2024. No
expiration date- a member
serves until they resign,
their council term ends or
they are replaced by the City
Council.

Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Advisory
Committee Member (not a policy body) Rafi Manoukian No No Advisory Committee Member City Council At the Discretion of City Council N/A Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
District 42
Nikki Perez (City of
Burbank) Yes N/A District 42 Regional Council
Representative
Selection of representative performed via an election by Arroyo Verdugo Executive Director on behalf of SCAG--
utilizing SCAG bylaws Final election made by the majority vote of Council Members from Burbank & Glendale. If only one name, seat is taken with no elections
Two year term May 3, 2024 to May 3,
2026
Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
Community, Economic & Human Development
Committee
Vacant Yes N/A
Committee Member, Community,
Economic & Human Development
Committee (CEHD)
San Fernando Valley COG
Nominated by SFVCOG Chair and voted
on by COG membership. Serves until such
time that member steps down or is
replaced by SFVCOG.

Page 2 of 3 ends

Updated
132 of 141

External Boards and Commissions List
Committee/Agency/Board Appointee Must Be
Elected? Alternate Title Appointment Made By Length of Term Term Period Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
Energy & Environment Committee
Vacant Yes N/A Committee Member, Energy &
Environment Committee (EEC)
Arroyo Verdugo Communities Joint Powers Authority
Committee
Two year term. Voted on by AV Steering
Committee in odd numbered years.

Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
General Assembly
Ardy Kassakhian Yes Ara Najarian Voting Delegate There is no formal process with SCAG. Council may make the appointment. Follow normal appointment protocol.

N/A (appointment is only for the Annual
General Assembly meeting)
N/A (appointment is only
for the Annual General
Assembly meeting)
Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
Transportation Committee
Ara Najarian (Dan is
also on their Member
List)
Yes Committee Member,
Transportation Committee (TC)
San Fernando Valley Council of Governments
(recommendation made by SFV COG Transportation
Committee vote)
Serves until such time that member steps
down or is replaced by SFVCOG.

Member is reaffirmed each year
N/A
Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG)
Transportation Committee
Dan Brotman Yes Committee Member,
Transportation Committee (TC)
San Fernando Valley Council of Governments
(recommendation made by SFV COG Transportation
Committee vote). Appointed by Arroyo for Brotman
Serves until such time that member steps
down or is replaced by SFVCOG.

Typically 2 year term but up to Council
discretion
Appointed: August 3, 2023

Page 3 of 3 ends

Updated
133 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
Meetings - Present Meetings - Absent Committee Meetings - Present Meetings - Absent Committee Arroyo Verdugo Communities JPA Dan Brotman Member, Arroyo Verdugo Communities Joint Powers Authority 5 1
6/21/2023 Special Meeting
8/3/2023 Regular Meeting
10/5/2023 Regular Meeting
12/7/2023 Regular Meeting
2/1/2024 Regular Meeting
4/4/2024* Regular Meeting *Excused
6/6/2024 Regular Meeting
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport
Authority Ara Najarian
Secretary & Interim Treasurer- Member of the
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority.

Member, Executive Committee & the Legal,
Government & Environmental Affairs Committee.
27 3 10 1
7/10/2023 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
8/2/2023 Executive Committee
8/28/2023 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
8/28/2023 Special Meeting
9/6/2023 Executive Committee
9/18/2023 Regular Meeting
9/18/2023 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
10/2/2023 Regular Meeting
10/4/2023 Executive Committee
10/16/2023 Regular Meeting
10/16/2023 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
10/31/2023 Executive Committee (Special
Meeting)
11/13/2023 Special Meeting
12/6/2023 Executive Committee
12/18/2023 Regular Meeting
12/18/2023 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
1/16/2024 Special Meeting
1/16/2024
Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
(Special Meeting)
1/24/2024 Special Meeting
2/20/2024 Special Meeting
2/20/2024
Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
(Special Meeting)
3/4/2024 Special Meeting
3/6/2024 Executive Committee
Committee/Agency/Board
Committee Attendance
June 2023 to Sept 2024
Updated 9/24/24
Notes
Subcommittee MeetingsRegular/Board Meetings
TitleAppointee
134 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
3/18/2024 Regular Meeting
3/18/2024 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
4/1/2024 Regular Meeting
4/3/2024 Executive Committee
4/15/2024 Regular Meeting
5/1/2024 Executive Committee
5/6/2024 Regular Meeting
6/3/2024 Regular Meeting
6/3/2024 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
6/5/2024 Executive Committee
6/17/2024 Regular Meeting
6/17/2024 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
7/10/2024 Executive Committee (Special
Meeting)
7/15/2024 Regular Meeting
7/15/2024 Legal, Government and
Environmental Affairs Committee
8/7/2024 Executive Committee
8/16/2024 Regular Meeting
8/19/2024 Regular Meeting
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport
Authority Elen Asatryan
Commissioner-Member of the Burbank-Glendale-
Pasadena Airport Authority Member of the
Operations and Development Committee
2 4
5/20/2024 Regular Meeting
6/3/2024 Regular Meeting
6/17/2024 Regular Meeting
7/15/2024 Regular Meeting
8/19/2024 Regular Meeting
9/16/2024 Regular Meeting
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport
Authority Frank Quintero Commissioner - Member of the Burbank-Glendale- Pasadena Airport Authority 20 0 17 0%
7/10/2023 Regular Meeting
7/10/2023 Finance and Administration
Committee
8/28/2023 Regular Meeting
9/18/2023 Regular Meeting
9/18/2023 Finance and Administration
Committee
10/2/2023 Regular Meeting
10/16/2023 Regular Meeting
10/16/2023 Finance and Administration
Committee
11/13/2023 Regular Meeting
11/13/2023 Finance and Administration
Committee
135 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
12/18/2023 Regular Meeting
12/18/2023 Finance and Administration
Committee
12/18/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
1/16/2024 Regular Meeting
1/16/2024 Regular Meeting
1/16/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
2/20/2024 Regular Meeting
2/20/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
2/29/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee (Special Meeting)
3/4/2024 Regular Meeting
3/18/2024 Regular Meeting
3/18/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
4/1/2024 Regular Meeting
4/1/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
4/15/2024 Regular Meeting
4/15/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
5/6/2024 Regular Meeting
5/20/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
5/28/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee (Special Meeting)
6/3/2024 Regular Meeting
6/3/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
6/17/2024 Regular Meeting
4/15/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
5/6/2024 Regular Meeting
7/15/2024 Finance and Administration
Committee
8/19/2024 Regular Meeting
8/24/2024
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Regional
Housing Trust Dan Brotman Director 3 1
7/12/2023 Regular Meeting
9/27/2023 Regular Meeting
1/10/2024 Regular Meeting
5/1/2024 Regular Meeting
California Contract Cities Association Vacant Board Member/Alternate Board Member City/Glendale Unified School District
(GUSD) Mayor Representative from City Hall
Civic Center Leaders Round Table
(GLRT)
Greater Los Angeles County Vector
Control District Board Stephen Ryfle Member, Board Member Education & Publicity 11 1 7/13/2024* Regular Meeting *Excused
8/10/2023 Regular Meeting
136 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
9/14/2023 Regular Meeting
10/12/2023 Regular Meeting
11/9/2023 Regular Meeting
12/14/2023 Regular Meeting
1/11/2024 Regular Meeting
2/8/2024* Regular Meeting *Excused
3/14/2024 Regular Meeting
4/11/2024 Regular Meeting
5/9/2024 Regular Meeting
6/13/2024 Regular Meeting
7/11/2024 Regular Meeting
8/8/2024 Regular Meeting
Independent Cities Association Vacant Board Director
Upper Los Angeles River and
Tributaries Working Group (AB 466 -
Section 33220 of Public Resources
Code)
Dan Brotman Representative 1 0
10/17/2023 Working Group - Regular Joint
Meeting
Upper Los Angeles River and
Tributaries Working Group (AB 466 -
Section 33220 of Public Resources
Code)
Chisom Obegolu Representative
League of California Cities VARIOUS
Policy Committees Vacant Committee Member
League of California Cities, General
Assembly Vacant Voting Delegate
League of California Cities, LA County
Division, City Selection Committee Mayor Committee Member LA County City Selection Committee -
North County/ San Fernando Valley
Sector of MTA
Mayor N/A
Metro San Fernando Valley Service
Council Myung Soo Seok Members
Metrolink, SCRRA Ara Najarian
Member, Board of Directors; Member, Executive
Committee; Member, Audit and Finance
Committee
17 5 9 1
7/14/2023 Audit and Finance Committee
Participating via teleconference
from 500 N. Brand Blvd. Ste
830, Glendale, CA 91203
7/14/2023 Executive Committee

7.28.23 Board of Directors
9/8/2023 Audit and Finance Committee
Participating via teleconference
from 500 N. Brand Blvd. Ste
830, Glendale, CA 91203
9/8/2024 Executive Committee
Participating via teleconference
from 500 N. Brand Blvd. Ste
830, Glendale, CA 91203
9/22/2023 Board of Directors
10/13/2023 Audit and Finance Committee
Participating via teleconference
from 500 N. Brand Blvd. Ste
830, Glendale, CA 91203
10/13/2023 Executive Committee
Participating via teleconference
from 500 N. Brand Blvd. Ste
830, Glendale, CA 91203
137 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
10/27/2023 Board of Directors
11/17/2023 Board of Directors
12/8/2023 Board of Directors
1/12/2024 Audit and Finance Committe
1/12/2024 Executive Committee
1/26/2024 Board of Directors
2/9/2024 Audit and Finance Committee
2/9/2024 Executive Committee
2/23/2024 Board of Directors
3/8/2024 Audit and Finance Committee
3/8/2024 Executive Committee
3/29/2024 Board of Directors
4/12/2024 Audit and Finance Committee
4/12/2024 Executive Committee
4/26/2024 Board of Directors
5/10/2024 Audit and Finance Committee
5/10/2024 Executive Committee
5/24/2024 Board of Directors
6/14/2024 Audit and Finance Committee
6/14/2024 Executive Committee
6/28/2024 Board of Directors
7/12/2024 Audit and Finane Committee
7/12/2024 Executive Committee
7/26/2024 Board of Directors
9/13/2024 Board of Directors
Metropolitan Transportation
Authority/ MTA Ara Najarian Member, Board of Directors 10 1 7/27/2023 Board Meeting
9/28/2023 Board Meeting
10/26/2023 Board Meeting
11/30/2023 Board Meeting
1/25/2024 Board Meeting
2/22/2024 Board Meeting
3/28/2024 Board Meeting
4/25/2024 Board Meeting
5/23/2024 Board Meeting
6/25/2024 Board Meeting
7/25/2024 Board Meeting
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Ardy Kassakhian
Member, Board of Directors; Vice Chair -
Legislation and Communications Committee;
Ethics, Organization, and Personnel Committee
16 7 8 17
6/13/2023 Board of Directors
7/10/2023 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee Meeting labaled as "inactive" 7/11/2023 Board of Directors
7/11/2023 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
7/25/2023 Board of Directors Workshop
8/14/2023 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee Meeting labaled as "inactive" 8/15/2023 Board of Directors
8/15/2023 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
8/22/2023 Special Board of Directors
9/11/2023 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
9/12/2023 Board of Directors
138 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
9/26/2024 Special Board of Directors
10/9/2023 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
10/10/2023 Board of Directors
11/13/2023 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
11/14/2023 Board of Directors
11/14/2023 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee Meeting labaled as "inactive" 12/5/2024 Special Board of Directors
1/8/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee Meeting labaled as "inactive" 1/9/2024 Board of Directors
1/9/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
1/17/2024 Special Board of Directors
2/13/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
2/13/2024 Board of Directors
2/27/2024 Board of Directors Workshop on
Proposed Biennial Budget
2/27/2024 Board of Directors
3/11/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee
3/11/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
3/12/2024 Board of Directors
3/26/2024 Board of Directors Workshops on
Proposed Biennial Budget
3/26/2024 Special Board of Directors
4/8/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee
4/9/2024 Board of Directors
4/9/2024 Board of Directors
5/13/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee
5/14/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
5/14/2024 Board of Directors
6/10/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee
6/11/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
6/11/2024 Board of Directors
6/13/2024 Special Board of Directors
7/8/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee
7/9/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
7/9/2024 Board of Directors
8/19/2024 Legislation, Regulatory Affairs,
and Communications Committee
8/20/2024 Board of Directors
8/20/2024 Ethics, Organization, and
Personnel Committee
9/10/2024 Board of Directors
San Fernando Valley Council of
Governments Ara Najarian Board of Directors 3 0
8/14/2023 Board Meeting
10/2/2023* Board Meeting *Excused
1/8/2024* Board Meeting *Excused
4/8/2024* Board Meeting *Excused
139 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
6/3/2024 Board of Directors Special Board
Meeting
7/8/2024 Regular Board Meeting
San Fernando Valley Council of
Governments Elen Asatryan Board of Directors 1
8/26/2024 Board Meeting
Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory Committee Rafi Manoukian Advisory Committee Member 2 8 7/17/2023
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
9/11/2023
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
10/17/2023
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
11/20/2023
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
12/4/2023
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
2/26/2024
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
4/8/2024
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
5/20/2024
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
6/17/2024
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
7/15/2024
Regular Joint Meeting (Santa
Monica Mountains Conservancy
and the Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy Advisory
Committee)
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) District 42
Nikki Perez (City of
Burbank) District 42 Regional Council Representative
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) Economic
Development Committee
Vacant Committee Member: Community, Economic &
Human Development Committee (CEHD)
140 of 141

Attendance Record - July 2023 to July 2024 -
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) Energy &
Environment Committee
Vacant Committee Member: Energy & Environment
Committee (EEC)
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG)
General Assembly
Ardy Kassakhian Voting Delegate
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG)Transportation
Committee
Ara Najarian Committee Member, Transportation Committee (TC) 5 0
10/5/2023 Regular Meeting
11/2/2023 Regular Meeting
1/4/2024 Regular Meeting
4/4/2024 Regular Meeting
6/6/2024 Regular Meeting
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG)Transportation
Committee
Dan Brotman Committee Member, Transportation Committee
(TC) 5 1
10/5/2023 Regular Meeting
11/2/2023 Regular Meeting
1/4/2024 Regular Meeting
2/1/2024 Regular Meeting
4/4/2024 Regular Meeting
6/6/2024 Regular Meeting
141 of 141

Glendale City CouncilOctober 1, 2024

Glendale City Council
October 1, 2024