Cities Index.
SPCC_11192024_Presentation_1

Glendale City Council
November 19, 2024

Document
SPCC_11192024_Presentation_1
Meeting
November 19, 2024
Body
Glendale City Council
Original file
1.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on glendaleca.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Permit and Entitlement Improvement Process
Phase II
City Council| November 19, 2024
Improvements Thus Far
• Implementation of express permits
• Eliminated unnecessary reviews by
other divisions and departments
• Updated checklists and bulletins
• Updated Energov to fix bugs
• New exemptions for geotechnical
reports
2 2
Improvements Thus Far
• Nearing completion of the mixed-use
and multi-family development standards
• Preapproved ADUs
• Collaboration with GWP to remove final
inspections
• Code changes
• Continuance of non-conformance
• Expand Administrative Design Review
3 3
Results
4 4

ENTITLEMENT

TIMELINES
Admin Design Review
2023
181
113
188
95 Admin Exception
Admin Use Permit
Design Review
2024
104
60 76
57 - 43.00%
-47.00%
-60.00%
-40.00%
YOY %CHANGE
Results
5 5

PLAN CHECK

REVIEW TIMELINES

FIRST ROUND REVIEW PERIOD (DAYS)
ADU
2023
56 49
20 43
61 Commercial/Mixed-Use
Multi Family
Single Family
Fence
Stucco
2024
33 25
12 34
59 215
-41.07 %
-48.98%
-40.00 %
-20.93%
-03.28%
-86.67%
YOY %CHANGE

PLAN CHECK REVIEW

TIMELINES

FIRST ROUND REVIEW PERIOD (DAYS)
ADU
2023
55 31
30 43
38 Commercial/Mixed-Use
Multi Family
Single Family
Fence
Stucco
2024
38 21
20 37
43 57
-30.91%
-32.26%
-33.33%
-13.95%
+13.16%
-28.57%
YOY %CHANGE
Building & Safety
Planning
Results
6 6
9%

NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS
17%

NUMBER OF PLAN CHECKS
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• Free standing fences and walls
• Eliminate design review
• Create objective standards
• Amnesty for those in violation
7 7
• Administrative Use Permit
• Eliminate AUP for alcohol sales in restaurants
• Eliminate AUP for banquet halls
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• Sign Re-facing
• No longer require permit to change a sign face
8 8
• Minimum Unit Sizes
• Prior direction to study
• Multi-family residential zones (R-3050, R-2250, R-1650 and R-1250) DU size minimums
• Efficiency and one bedroom units: 600 square feet.
• Two bedroom units: 800 square feet.
• Three or more bedroom units: 1,000 square feet.
• Downtown Specific Plan DU size minimums
• Senior or affordable: 540 square feet
• Efficiency and one bedroom units: 600 square feet
• Two bedroom units: 800 square feet.
• Three or more bedroom units: 1,000 square feet.

Phase II Proposed Improvements
• Inground pools
• Train Building & Safety staff to review
• Eliminate Planning review requirements
9 9
• Basement FAR Calculation
• FAR intent is to reduce mass
• Where basement is not visible from the right-of-
way, eliminate from FAR calculation
• More flexibility for homeowners
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• Ministerial Parcel Maps
• Approval with no conditions or additional
requirements for 10 or fewer units
10 10
• Refine Pre-application process
• Reduce requirements
• Be able to address challenges early on and easier to
correct
• Require for new developments
• Assists in getting a project to compliance
• Credit for the pre-application would apply to future
permits
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• Parking Updates
• Update to be consistent with all State laws
• Study the potential for parking maximums
11 11
• Concierge Service
• Create a fee-based service for larger projects
• Guaranteed timelines
• Programs that Council may want to support
• TI’s for small businesses
• Income based assistance
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• EIR Contracting Process
• Maintain 3 firms on call for proposals
• Eliminate RFP for each project
• Reduces timelines by 3 – 5 months
12 12
• Low Impact Development (LID)
• Relocate review from Public Works to CDD
• Consolidate review and less departmental
coordination
• Add staff member to address LID
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• EIR Contracting Process
• Maintain 3 firms on call for proposals
• Eliminate RFP for each project
• Reduces timelines by 3 – 5 months
13 13
• Low Impact Development (LID)
• Relocate review from Public Works to CDD
• Consolidate review and less departmental
coordination
• Add staff member to address LID
Phase II Proposed Improvements
• Division Structure
• Consider improvements / merging of Divisions
14 14
• Fast Track Tenant Improvement
• Guaranteed turn-around of 5 days
• No mechanical, no fire, no exterior changes
• Cashiering
• Remove from CDD
• Sister Framing
• Allow for rehab – not count as new construction
Next Steps
• Staff will develop alternatives based on Council direction • Return for final direction
• Code Changes
• Present to Planning Commission
• Return to Council
• Non-code changes
• Immediate implementation once approved
15 15
Feedback
16 16
Proposed Improvement Yes No Notes
Fences / Walls – No DRB + Amnesty
AUP – Eliminate for alcohol
Signs – Eliminate permit for re-facing
Minimum Unit Size – Study to reduce or eliminate
Inground pools – Remove Planning review
Basement FAR – Remove from FAR calculation
Parcel Maps – Remove staff review per State
Pre-Application Process – Redefine and overhaul
Parking Requirements – Update per State / Consider maximums Concierge Service – Study Fee based and Council directed programs EIR Process – Eliminate RFP process
LID – Transfer from PWD to CDD
Department Structure – Study structure to improve collaboration and customer service
Fast Track Tenant Improvement
Cashiering – Move from CDD
Allow Sister Framing When Calculating Demo/New Construction #MyGlendale
17

← All documents from this meeting