Cities Index.
CC_05202025_Report_4f

Glendale City Council
May 20, 2025

Document
CC_05202025_Report_4f
Meeting
May 20, 2025
Body
Glendale City Council
Original file
106 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on glendaleca.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

{{section.number}}f
25-87850

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for On-Call Grant Research, Writing and Management Services for Public Works Engineering Projects 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute PSAs for a duration of three years in the amount of $300,000 each with an option to extend the contract for an additional two-year term and $200,000 each with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and KOA Corporation, to provide on-call grant research, writing, and management Services. 2) Resolution of appropriation

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for May 13, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PSAs are needed for consultants to provide comprehensive grant services for the Public Works Department (PWD). These consultants will perform various grant services such as identifying and researching new grant opportunities, developing and drafting grant proposals, and providing ongoing support in managing the administrative and financial aspects of awarded grants.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, the consulting firms listed in this report are recommended to be selected. The proposed agreements with these firms will cost in the aggregate $1,500,000 over the course of the five years. Additionally, a resolution of appropriation for $300,000 is needed to provide initial funding for these agreements.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute the PSAs with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and KOA Corporation, to provide On-Call Grant Services in the amount of $300,000 each for an initial three-year term and $200,000 each for an optional additional two-year extension and a resolution of appropriation.

ANALYSIS
{{section.number}}f2
25-87850
5 9
9 9
The Engineering Division (PWE) of PWD provides project planning and development, design, bid and award processing, grant writing and management for various Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects.

PWE currently manages more than $130 million in grants for various CIP projects in the planning, design, and construction phases. Staff has relied on internal resources to research new grant opportunities, develop and draft grant proposals and manage the administrative and financial tasks associated with obtaining grant fund for multiple CIP projects to help the city and PWD achieve its infrastructure goals and remain fiscally responsible.

PWE is actively pursuing and receiving numerous federal and state grants and funds such as Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP), Active Transportation Plan (ATP), Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP), Metro Active Transportation (MAT) Program, Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A), Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Program, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and many more.

In order to supplement PWE’s success in obtaining and managing multiple infrastructure related grants, PWE is seeking to contract with experienced consulting firms specializing in securing and managing competitive federal and state grants that will improve CIP project funding for the future.

Due to increased funding demand across the state and nation for infrastructure projects, as well as frequent changes to the state and federal policies, federal and state grants have become increasingly competitive. More public agencies are competing to obtain necessary funding for their infrastructure projects, while restrictions and regulations associated with these funds are becoming more difficult to navigate. Therefore, it is imperative for PWE to hire experienced consultants that are well versed in this subject topic to produce compelling and competitive applications to secure funding for critical infrastructure investment and capital improvements.

Without the services of these consulting firms, the city may find it increasingly difficult to fund CIP projects and must rely on funding projects by using limited State Gas Tax funds or General Fund. Ultimately the city needs to maximize the benefits of grant funding to advance its infrastructure mission and improve the quality of life in Glendale.

The selected pre-qualified consultants will provide their professional grant services on an “As-Needed” basis.

To secure the most qualified consultants, on October 1, 2024, an RFP was issued for the On-Call Grant Research, Writing and Management Services for Public Works Engineering.

To encourage competitive proposals, the city advertised the RFP on the city’s website and multiple plan-holder platforms, reaching a broad network of consultants, {{section.number}}f3
25-87850
5 9
9 9
contractors, and construction industry professionals.

On November 5, 2024, the city received Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from fifteen consulting firms under RFP #PWA 2024-027:

1. Ardurra Group, Inc.

2. Blais & Associates, LLC

3. Boules Consulting

4. California Consulting

5. CWE

6. Engineering Solutions Services, Inc.

7. Evan Brooks Associates, Inc.

8. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

9. KOA Corporation

10. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

11. MNS Engineers, Inc.

12. STV Incorporated

13. Villa Civil

14. Wildan Engineering

15. Witt O'Brien's, LLC
An evaluation team of staff from PWD reviewed the SOQs, which were all ranked based on the following criteria: Experience and Knowledge; Quality of Submittal; Measurable and Trackable Results; and Best Value. The scoring of the evaluation is presented as follows:

Proposer Total Score (100 points max)
Mark Thomas & Co., Inc. 86
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 82
KOA 81
Evan Brooks Associates, Inc. 80
MNS Engineers, Inc. 74
Ardura Group, Inc. 69
Wildan Engineering 67
CWE 67
Engineering Solutions Services, Inc. 65
California Consulting 64
Witt O'Brien's, LLC 63
Blais & Associates, LLC 55
STV Incorporates 51
Villa Civil, APC 47
Boules Consulting 33
Upon review of the SOQ submittals and interviews, Staff finds the following consultants {{section.number}}f4
25-87850
5 9
9 9
to be the most qualified to perform comprehensive grant services:

1. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

2. Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc.

3. KOA Corporation

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable for this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The On-Call Granting Services Agreements will cost approximately $300,000 per fiscal year with an aggregate cost of $1,500,000 for the period of five years, of which the first year budget needed for these PSAs was not included as a part of the FY 2024-25 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting a new appropriation of $300,000 from the Gas Tax Fund for the remainder of this fiscal year for these PSAs and moving forward the future years will be included in the upcoming fiscal year budget requests. The appropriation request is outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source
$300,000 GL: 24219-4020-PWD-
0000-P0000
GL: 43110-4020-PWD-0020-
P0000
PL: PWD01037AA
State
Gas Tax
Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable for this report.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company submitted their proposals or recommended for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not approve the motion to award the PSA and do not approve the resolution of appropriation as recommended herein. This would result in the delay and increased difficulty to fund the construction of vital Capital Improvement Program Projects in the city.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
{{section.number}}f5
25-87850
5 9
9 9
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Armen Avazian, Principal Civil Engineer
Rustom Tavitian, P.E., Civil Engineer II
Yvonne Guerra, Administrative Analyst
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Disclosure Forms

← All documents from this meeting