Cities Index.
CC_05202025_Report_4f

Glendale City Council
June 3, 2025

Document
CC_05202025_Report_4f
Meeting
June 3, 2025
Body
Glendale City Council
Original file
107 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on glendaleca.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

{{section.number}}{{item.number}}
25-87850

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for On-Call Grant Research, Writing and Management Services for Public Works Engineering Projects 1) Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute PSAs for an initial three-year terms, with an option to extend each PSA for an additional two-year terms, with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and KOA Corporation for an aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $1,500,000 to be shared among the three consultant PSAs to provide on-call grant research, writing, and management Services. The City Manager, or his designee, is further authorized to execute any necessary amendments to each of the PSAs subject to the herein $1,500,000 aggregate not-to-exceed amount.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 3, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PSAs are needed for consultants to provide comprehensive grant services for the Public Works Department (PWD). These consultants will perform various grant services such as identifying and researching new grant opportunities, developing and drafting grant proposals, and providing ongoing support in managing the administrative and financial aspects of awarded grants.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, the consulting firms listed in this report are recommended to be selected. The proposed agreements with these firms will cost in the aggregate $1,500,000 over the course of the five years.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the PSAs with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., and KOA Corporation, to provide On-Call Grant Services for an initial three-year term with an option to extend each PSA for an additional two-year term. The total budget and aggregate not-to-exceed amount for the initial three-year and additional 2-year-term extension to be shared between the three PSAs shall be $1,500,000.
{{section.number}}{{item.number}}2
25-87850
5 9
9 9

ANALYSIS
The Engineering Division (PWE) of PWD provides project planning and development, design, bid and award processing, grant writing and management for various Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects.

PWE currently manages more than $130 million in grants for various CIP projects in the planning, design, and construction phases. Staff has relied on internal resources to research new grant opportunities, develop and draft grant proposals and manage the administrative and financial tasks associated with obtaining grant fund for multiple CIP projects to help the city and PWD achieve its infrastructure goals and remain fiscally responsible.

PWE is actively pursuing and receiving numerous federal and state grants and funds such as Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP), Active Transportation Plan (ATP), Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP), Metro Active Transportation (MAT) Program, Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A), Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Program, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and many more.

In order to supplement PWE’s success in obtaining and managing multiple infrastructure related grants, PWE is seeking to contract with experienced consulting firms specializing in securing and managing competitive federal and state grants that will improve CIP project funding for the future.

Due to increased funding demand across the state and nation for infrastructure projects, as well as frequent changes to the state and federal policies, federal and state grants have become increasingly competitive. More public agencies are competing to obtain necessary funding for their infrastructure projects, while restrictions and regulations associated with these funds are becoming more difficult to navigate. Therefore, it is imperative for PWE to hire experienced consultants that are well versed in this subject topic to produce compelling and competitive applications to secure funding for critical infrastructure investment and capital improvements.

Without the services of these consulting firms, the city may find it increasingly difficult to fund CIP projects and must rely on funding projects by using limited State Gas Tax funds or General Fund. Ultimately the city needs to maximize the benefits of grant funding to advance its infrastructure mission and improve the quality of life in Glendale.

The selected pre-qualified consultants will provide their professional grant services on an “As-Needed” basis.

To secure the most qualified consultants, on October 1, 2024, an RFP was issued for the On-Call Grant Research, Writing and Management Services for Public Works Engineering.

To encourage competitive proposals, the city advertised the RFP on the city’s website {{section.number}}{{item.number}}3
25-87850
5 9
9 9
and multiple plan-holder platforms, reaching a broad network of consultants, contractors, and construction industry professionals.

On November 5, 2024, the city received Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from fifteen consulting firms under RFP #PWA 2024-027:

1. Ardurra Group, Inc.

2. Blais & Associates, LLC

3. Boules Consulting

4. California Consulting

5. CWE

6. Engineering Solutions Services, Inc.

7. Evan Brooks Associates, Inc.

8. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

9. KOA Corporation

10. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

11. MNS Engineers, Inc.

12. STV Incorporated

13. Villa Civil

14. Wildan Engineering

15. Witt O'Brien's, LLC
An evaluation team of staff from PWD reviewed the SOQs, which were all ranked based on the following criteria: Experience and Knowledge; Quality of Submittal; Measurable and Trackable Results; and Best Value. The scoring of the evaluation is presented as follows:

Proposer Total Score (100 points max)
Mark Thomas & Co., Inc. 86
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 82
KOA 81
Evan Brooks Associates, Inc. 80
MNS Engineers, Inc. 74
Ardura Group, Inc. 69
Wildan Engineering 67
CWE 67
Engineering Solutions Services, Inc. 65
California Consulting 64
Witt O'Brien's, LLC 63
Blais & Associates, LLC 55
STV Incorporates 51
Villa Civil, APC 47
Boules Consulting 33
Upon review of the SOQ submittals and interviews, Staff finds the following consultants {{section.number}}{{item.number}}4
25-87850
5 9
9 9
to be the most qualified to perform comprehensive grant services:

1. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

2. Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc.

3. KOA Corporation

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable for this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total aggregate budget for all three PSA’s for On-Call Granting Services Agreements is $1,500,000 for the initial three-years and additional two-year term extension period. Funding for the FY 2024-25 cost was not included as part of the budget. Therefore, staff is requesting a new appropriation of $450,000 from the Gas Tax Fund for the remainder of this fiscal year for these PSAs. Funding for each fiscal year will be requested as part of the City’s annual budget process. The appropriation request is outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source
$450,000 GL: 24219-4020-PWD-
0000-P0000
GL: 43110-4020-PWD-0020-
P0000
PL: PWD01037AA
State
Gas Tax
Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not applicable for this report.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company submitted their proposals or recommended for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Choose not to approve the PSA as recommended herein.. This will result in delay and increased difficulty to fund the construction of vital Capital Improvement Program Projects in the city.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
{{section.number}}{{item.number}}5
25-87850
5 9
9 9
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Armen Avazian, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer
Rustom Tavitian, P.E., Civil Engineer II
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Disclosure Forms

← All documents from this meeting