9a
CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
Report: FY 2025-26 Citywide Budget Hearing and Adoption 1) Hold a Public Hearing on the FY 2025-26 Proposed Citywide Budget and Changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule
2) Resolution Adopting the FY 2025-26 City of Glendale Budget 3) Resolution Modifying Existing Fees for Parking Services Provided by the City and Adopting Changes to the Comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule for FY 2025-26 4) Motion to Increase the Citywide Authorized Salaried Position Count 5) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale Management Association Memorandum of Understanding, including Employee Relations Exempt Classifications
6) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 18 7) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale City Employees’ Association Memorandum of Understanding, including Confidential and Hourly Classifications
8) Resolution Adopting the Glendale Water & Power Public Benefit Programs Plan and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard Programs Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-26 and 2026-27 and Authorize Agreements to Implement Said Programs 9) Resolution of Appropriation for FY 2024-25 to Transfer Funds from the Parking Fund to the General Fund and the Capital Improvement Fund due to the collapsing of the Parking Fund into the General Fund as of June 30, 2025.
COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for June 24, 2025 calendar
29a
5 0
9 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Charter requires an annual public hearing and adoption of the City’s budget for the upcoming year. The FY 2025-26 proposed budget reflects the input received from City Council, as identified during the four study sessions held between May 8 and June 12, 2025. The following proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 annual budget is presented to City Council for adoption.
The total appropriation proposed for FY 2025-26 citywide budget is $1.2 billion, of which $352.5 million is in the General Fund. For the General Fund, based on the FY 2025-26 proposed revenues and appropriations, we anticipate balancing the budget with an estimated use of fund balance of approximately $4.0 million and a reserve of 33.9% of the 2025-26 proposed budget. The City Council’s current General Fund Reserve Policy is a minimum of 25% of the annual operating budget, with a target of 35%; while the City’s Charter Reserve requirement is 50% of projected Property Tax Revenue.
In addition, staff is proposing increasing existing fees for Parking Services as part of Glendale’s parking management strategy. The strategy emphasizes premium rates for the most desirable spaces, while encouraging use of City-owned parking garages in less central locations. The recommendations are presented as amendments to the Citywide Fee Schedule.
As part of its ongoing effort to ensure an effective and equitable organizational structure, City departments periodically review job classifications, titles, and compensation levels. These reviews respond to changing operational needs, market conditions, recruitment and retention challenges, and the results of equity analyses.
Staff is proposing three resolutions to establish new classifications, update job titles in the Information Technology Department, and delete obsolete classifications as detailed in this report.
Staff is also requesting the adoption of the Glendale Water & Power Public Benefit Charge Programs Plan, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard Programs Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-26 and 2026-27, and authorization of associated agreements to implement said programs.
Lastly, staff is seeking authorization for a Resolution of Appropriation to transfer funds from the Parking Fund to the General Fund and the Capital Improvement Fund, due to the collapsing of the Parking Fund into the General Fund as of June 30, 2025.
RECOMMENDATION
To hold a public hearing and adopt the FY 2025-26 Proposed Citywide Budget and Changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule related to parking fees. To adopt resolutions to establish new classifications, update job titles in the Information Technology Department, and delete obsolete classifications as detailed in this report. Additionally, to adopt the Glendale Water & Power Public Benefit Charge Programs Plan and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard Programs Plan. Lastly, to approve a Resolution of Appropriation for FY 2024-25 to transfer funds from the Parking Fund to the General 39a
5 0
9 9
Fund and the Capital Improvement Fund due to the collapsing of the Parking Fund into the General Fund as of June 30, 2025.
ANALYSIS
FY 2025-26 PROPOSED CITYWIDE BUDGET
The total proposed appropriation for the FY 2025-26 citywide budget is $1.2 billion. A summary of revenue estimates and appropriations for all funds can be found in Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively. The following table represents a summary of citywide appropriations by fund type, as adopted for FY 2024-25 and as proposed for FY 2025-26.
GENERAL FUND
The General Fund provides the majority of ongoing governmental services that are not funded through restricted special revenue funds. These services include Fire, Police, Community Development, Community Services and Parks, Library, Arts & Culture, Public Works, and central support service departments that include City Attorney, City Clerk, City Treasurer, Finance, Human Resources, and Management Services. The General Fund is supported by general taxes including property, sales, utility users, and other taxes, in addition to various fees and a transfer from Electric operating revenue funds.
This year has been extremely challenging financially, given the dynamics of our local economy. During the development of the FY 2025-26 General Fund budget, staff identified a structural imbalance of approximately $34.3 million. This shortfall is primarily due to an anticipated loss of revenue of $14.1 million, including a $6.9 million decline in Sales Tax, $1.0 million decline in Utility Users Tax, $2.1 million from Building, Planning, and Street Permits, and a $3.0 million decrease in Landfill Host Assessment and Tipping Fees, slightly offset by a $1.2 million increase in Property Taxes from the originally anticipated increase of $2.7 million, totaling $3.9 increase for FY 2025-26.
Concurrently, projected expenditures increased by $19.9 million, further straining the General Fund. This increase is primarily driven by the addition of 23 sworn positions approved as part of Project 300, rising personnel costs, and the filling of previously vacant positions. In prior years, vacancy savings were used to help balance the budget; Adopted Proposed %
Fund Type (In Thousands) FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Increase /
(Decrease) Change
General Fund $ 325,660 $ 352,480 $ 26,820 8.2% Special Revenue Funds 152,242 139,709 (12,533) (8.2%)
Debt Service Funds 2,995 2,999 4 0.1%
Capital Improvement Funds 33,282 20,966 (12,316) (37.0%) Enterprise Funds 544,159 556,835 12,676 2.3%
Internal Service Funds 146,048 163,276 17,228 11.8%
Citywide Total $ 1,204,386 $1,236,265 $ 31,879 2.6%
49a
5 0
9 9
however, with most positions now filled, this strategy is no longer sustainable. This is particularly evident in the Police Department, which is now fully staffed for the first time in many years. Historically, the department relied on vacancy savings to offset underfunded overtime and maintenance and operation costs. With vacancy savings no longer available, an additional $5.0 million was allocated to align funding with actual spending.
Over the past several months, we have acknowledged the true cost of doing business and taken steps to confront our fiscal challenges. In pursuit of a more balanced and fiscally responsible FY 2025-26 budget, staff engaged in a series of departmental meetings to analyze and identify strategies to address the structural imbalance. As a result, $20.6 million in budget balancing strategies have been developed, as outlined below:
Reductions - One-Time In Millions
Cancelled Transfer to Fleet Fund $ 2.0
Cancelled Transfer to CIP Fund 10.0
Cancelled Transfer to Building Maintenance Fund 0.8 Reductions - Permanent
Departmental Reductions 4.2
Defunded Vacant Positions Net Impact 3.6
Total Budget Balancing Strategies $ 20.6
As part of the budget balancing strategies, staff proposed canceling transfers to two Internal Service Funds, Fleet and Building Maintenance. Following the review of the fund forecasts, staff determined that both funds have the capacity to forgo transfers for one year without impacting operations. In the case of Fleet Fund, most fleet capital outlay purchases have long delivery timelines, meaning the funding will not be immediately needed in FY 2025-26.
Staff also proposed canceling the transfer from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund. However, eliminating the transfer meant that there would not be funding for new projects in FY 2025-26. Given that departments submitted $20.6 million in new appropriation requests, staff identified cost reduction strategies to address this challenge. These strategies included delaying certain projects to FY 2026-27, reducing appropriations for non-essential projects, and canceling previously submitted funding requests. These measures helped reduce the appropriations and created available funding for FY 2025-26 project requests.
While the canceled transfers are one-time measures, the defunding of vacant positions and departmental reductions are permanent. A soft hiring freeze has been implemented, beginning with the defunding of 33 vacant citywide positions. These positions remain part of the authorized salaried position count but have been placed in a non-departmental account. Departments may request to reinstate and fill these positions once a permanent funding source is identified. 59a
5 0
9 9
Additionally, departments conducted a thorough review of their budgets and identified areas for reduction to help mitigate the General Fund deficit. Of the originally proposed departmental reductions of $4.2 million, $224,000 was restored to the Public Works department for forestry maintenance and planting at citywide parkways, per City Council direction.
Following these strategies, the General Fund deficit was reduced to approximately $13.7 million. During the budget study sessions, additional cost reduction strategies and revenue generating opportunities were explored. Staff identified the non-essential projects with minimal expenditures (under 10% of their budget) which also did not pose any safety, security, or regulatory concerns. After careful consideration, Council directed staff to pause and defund the Maryland Street & Alley Improvement/Artsakh project, releasing $8.8 million for transfer back to the General Fund.
Additionally, staff identified $200,000 in savings from the Glorietta Field Lighting Improvement project. The original project scope included pole replacements and converting the light ballasts to LED. In early June, staff learned that only one pole required complete replacement for the remaining poles, light shielding will be added instead of a complete overhaul, thus reducing the project costs from $500,000 to $300,000. In total, these two project elimination/reduction will return $9.0 million to fund balance, which will be transferred from the Capital Improvement Fund to the General Fund.
As part of the revenue generating strategies, staff presented a list of potential measures and received direction on items with majority consensus from City Council. One such item was an increase to existing Parking Fees, which is expected to generate approximately $1.0 million in additional revenue. These fee increases, along with an amendment to the Citywide Fee Schedule, are being presented for consideration.
Collectively, these efforts have reduced the FY 2025-26 deficit from approximately $34.3 million to $4.0 million. However, most of the maneuvers and strategies implemented are one-time measures. Without new recurring revenue sources, reductions in future expenditures or financing/refinancing initiatives for current expenditures, the City will continue to face significant fiscal challenges in the years ahead, as illustrated in the General Fund’s 5-year forecast.
Finally, beginning FY 2025-26, the Parking Fund is collapsing into the General Fund, driven primarily due to having operated in the negative for several years. When a Special Revenue Fund cannot sustain itself, it is best practice to collapse the fund into the General Fund. This coincides with the phasing out of the contract with the current parking enforcement vendor. Public feedback regarding the service provided by the current vendor has been largely negative, and the cost to extend or renew the contract has exceeded the City’s original estimates. Bringing the parking enforcement function back to the Police Department is expected to increase the quality of service and be more cost effective.
69a
5 0
9 9
Resources
The following table reflects the General Fund revenue estimates for FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 by major category.
General Fund Revenues
(In Thousands)
Revenue changes for the proposed FY 2025-26 budget are described in detail below. Property Tax: This category is estimated to generate approximately $87.9 million revenue, or 4.7% increase compared to the previous year. The City continues to experience modest growth in its property tax revenues. However, there has been an overall flattening of home sale prices and a decrease in the number of home sales in calendar year 2024 compared to 2023, mainly due to high interest rates and shortage of housing supply.
Sales Tax: This category is projected to generate approximately $86.8 million, reflecting a 4.7% decline compared to the prior year. This decline is largely due to a market correction following consistent growth in previous years, combined with reduced sales in the auto and transportation category, an area of significant reliance for the City.
Utility Users Tax (UUT): This category is estimated to be approximately $34.2 million, reflecting a 4.8% increase compared to the prior year. This increase is attributed to the increase in the electric service rates.
Category
Adopted
FY 2024-25
Proposed
FY 2025-26 Variance
%
Change
Property Taxes $ 84,012 $ 87,928 $ 3,916 4.7%
Sales Taxes 91,088 86,775 (4,313) (4.7%)
Utility Users Taxes 32,677 34,245 1,568 4.8%
Occupancy Taxes 10,784 11,498 714 6.6%
Licenses & Permits 11,339 9,444 (1,895) (16.7%)
Revenue from Other Agencies 385 460 75 19.5%
Charges for Services 38,957 43,041 4,084 10.5%
Interfund Revenue 19,722 19,861 139 0.7%
Fines and Forfeitures 3,300 7,470 4,170 126.4%
Interest/Use of Money 3,845 3,436 (409) (10.6%)
Misc. & Non-Operating 1,171 1,146 (25) (2.1%)
Transfers from Other Funds 28,971 41,571 12,600 43.5%
Total Revenues $ 326,251 $ 346,875 $ 20,624 6.3%
Assigned Fund Balance – Parking Fund - 1,600 1,600 N/A Use of Fund Balance - 4,005 4,005 N/A
Total Resources $ 326,251 $ 352,480 $ 26,229 8.0%
79a
5 0
9 9
Occupancy Taxes: This category is estimated to be approximately $11.5 million, which is a 6.6% increase from the FY 2024-25 estimate. The travel industry has experienced growth, driven by rising travel demand, and this trend is expected to continue in FY 2025-26.
Licenses & Permits: Th is category is estimated to be approximately $9.4 million, reflecting a decrease of 16.7% from the FY 2024-25 estimate. The decrease is due to less permits being submitted/requested.
Charges for Services: This category is estimated to be approximately $43.0 million, reflecting a 10.5% increase from the FY 2024-25 revenue estimate. This increase includes $7.9 million resulting from the Parking Fund collapsing into the General Fund beginning FY 2025-26, partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in Landfill Host Assessment and Tipping fees due to reduced tonnage.
Revenue from Other Agencies: This category is estimated to be approximately $460,000, reflecting an increase of 19.5% from the FY 2024-25 estimate. The projected increase is due to new training reimbursements for Police. Interfund Revenue: This category is estimated to be approximately $19.9 million, reflecting an increase of 0.7% from the FY 2024-25 estimate. The projected increase is due to an increase in cost allocation charges. Fines and Forfeitures: This category is estimated to be approximately $7.5 million, reflecting an increase of 126.4% from the FY 2024-25 estimate.
The projected increase of $4.0 million is a result of the Parking Fund collapsing into the General Fund beginning FY 2025-26.
Interest/Use of Money: This category is estimated to be approximately $3.4 million, reflecting a decrease of 10.6% from the FY 2024-25 estimate.
The projected decrease is due to a reduction in the expected interest rate return on investments from 3.0% to 2.25%.
Misc. & Non-Operating: This category is estimated to be approximately $1.1 million for FY 2025-26, reflecting a modest 2.1% decline compared to prior year.
Transfers from Other Funds: This category is estimated to be approximately $41.6 million for FY 2025-26. This includes an increase in the Electric Works Revenue fund transfer, now at 10.8% of the total electric operating revenues, and a transfer from the Capital Improvement Fund from two FY 2024-25 projects, as noted below:
o$8.8 million from the defunded Maryland Street & Alley Improvement/Artsakh project.
o$200,000 from the Glorietta Field Lighting Improvement project. 89a
5 0
9 9
Appropriations
The following table shows the appropriations for the General Fund for FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 by category.
General Fund Appropriations
(In Thousands)
Category
Adopted
FY 2024-25
Proposed
FY 2025-26
Increase/
Decrease
%
Change
Salaries & Benefits $231,091 $260,476 $29,385 12.7% Maintenance & Operation 79,991 90,131 10,140 12.7% Capital Outlay 145 240 95 65.5% Transfers Out 14,433 1,633 (12,800) (88.7%) Total Appropriations $325,660 $352,480 $26,820 8.2% As indicated above, the General Fund budget is forecasted to increase by approximately $26.8 million, or 8.2% compared to the Adopted FY 2024-25 budget.
This increase is mainly attributable to the following:
Salaries & Benefits: The total net increase in the Salaries & Benefits category is approximately $29.4 million. The increase is mainly a result of filling vacancies at a much higher rate than in the previous year, combined with Memorandum of Understanding Cost of Living Adjustments and normal salary step progression.
Of this total, approximately $2.1 million is attributed to cost of living adjustments in the Fire Department; $15.6 million to the Police Department, reflecting cost of living adjustments, the addition of 23 Sworn positions approved as part of Project 300, and increased overtime costs; $4.1 million is associated with salaries and benefits stemming from the collapse of the Parking Fund into the General Fund; and about $7.6 million is due to filled vacancies. Maintenance & Operation: The total net increase is approximately $10.1 million, of which $8.8 million is attributable to the collapse of the Parking Fund into the General Fund. The remaining increase is primarily attributable to an increase in the Information Technology Department (ITD) Service Change, reflecting the cost of projects completed two years in arrears.
Capital Outlay: The total net increase of $95,000 is due to additional turnouts and defibrillator purchases by the Fire Department this year compared to the prior year.
Transfers Out: The total net decrease of $12.8 million is due to the cancellation of a $10.0 million transfer to the Capital Improvement Fund, a $2.0 million reduction from not transferring funds to the Fleet Fund, and the suspension of an $800,000 transfer to the Building Maintenance Fund.
99a
5 0
9 9
General Fund
Projected Ending Fund Balance & Reserve Percentage, June 30, 2026 (in millions)
Based on the FY 2025-26 proposed revenues and appropriations, the General Fund budget is facing a deficit of $4.0 million and a reserve of 33.9% of the 2025-26 proposed budget. The City Council’s current General Fund Reserve policy is a minimum of 25% of the annual operating budget, with a target of 35%; while the City’s Charter Reserve requirement is 50% of projected Property Tax Revenue.
Projected FY 2024-25 Ending Reserve $ 123.5
Total Resources $348.5
Total Expenditures 352.5
Surplus/(Deficit) (4.0)
Projected FY 2025-26 Ending Reserve $ 119.5
Reserve % 33.9%
OTHER FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds
The approximately $12.5 million decrease in the Special Revenue Funds is primarily due to the following:
CDBG Fund 2010 – The decrease of approximately $425,000 is mainly due to lower revenue compared to the prior year, which included the re-budgeting of $467,000 in undesignated funds from canceled projects. This reduction has led to a decrease in direct assistance and less project appropriation. New projects include the Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project and Pelanconi Park Renovation Project.
Housing Assistance Fund 2020 – The net increase of approximately $2.9 million is primarily due to higher grant revenue to be used towards direct assistance, driven by a substantial increase in Payment Standards set by the Glendale Housing Authority, resulting in a higher Per Unit Cost (PUC). Home Grant Fund 2030 – The net increase of approximately $253,000 is attributed to higher projected federal grants, to be applied towards direct assistance.
Emergency Solutions Grant Fund 2050 – The net increase of $417,000 is due to the receipt of an additional special allocation of “Rapid Unsheltered Survivor Housing” ESG-RUSH funds, primarily to be applied to direct assistance. 109a
5 0
9 9
Workforce Fund 2060 – The net increase of approximately $399,000 is based on increases in direct assistance and leases, partially offset by a decrease in hourly wages.
Affordable Housing Trust Fund 2090 – The decrease of approximately $39,000 is in personnel costs.
Glendale Youth Alliance Fund 2110 – The net decrease of approximately $67,000 is primarily due to lower projected revenue and a reduction in hourly wages.
BEGIN Homeownership Fund 2120 – The increase of $2,000 is due to an increase in interest income applied towards direct assistance. Low & Mod Income Housing Asset Fund 2130 – The net decrease of approximately $4,000 is primarily due to a reduction in hourly wages, partially offset by an increase in contractual services.
Miscellaneous Grant Fund 2160 – The decrease of approximately $372,000 is due to a decrease in grant revenue and decreased project appropriation. Hazardous Disposal Fund 2190 – The increase of approximately $113,000 is due to increases in contractual services and non-discretionary maintenance and operations such as utilities, cost allocation, and ITD service charge. Parking Fund 2210 – The decrease of approximately $17.3 million is due to the Parking Fund collapsing into the General Fund beginning FY 2025-26. Capital Improvement projects originally budgeted within this fund will carry over to the Capital Improvement Fund (4010). All other funding will continue within the General Fund (1010).
Measure M Local Return Fund 2220 – The increase of approximately $53,000 is due to an increase in subsidy expense to the Transit Utility Fund, partially offset by a decrease in project appropriation. Measure H Fund 2240 – The decrease of approximately $564,000 is due to the termination of Measure H, a quarter-cent sales tax set by Los Angeles County.
This measure is to be replaced by Measure A, a Los Angeles County half-cent sales tax for homeless services and affordable housing. Measure W Fund 2260 – The net increase of approximately $83,000 is primarily due to increases in personnel costs and contractual services. Permanent Local Housing Allocation Fund 2280 – The decrease of approximately $74,000 is due to the project-based nature of the expense, with no appropriation allocated for FY 2025-26.
119a
5 0
9 9
Air Quality Improvement Fund 2510 – The increase of approximately $126,000 is primarily due to decrease in contractual services due to one-time appropriation for charging stations and E-Bikes in the prior year, offset by an increase in capital outlay for the purchase of 19 EV Crossover Vehicles. San Fernando Landscape District Fund 2530 – The increase of approximately $3,000 is due to an increase in contractual services.
Measure R Local Return Fund 2540 – The decrease of approximately $6.0 million is primarily due to an increase in subsidy expenses, offset by a reduction in capital outlay and capital improvement projects compared to the prior year.
Measure R Regional Return Fund 2550 – The increase of $5.0 million is due to increased project appropriation, specifically for La Crescenta Avenue Rehabilitation Project and Downtown Glendale Traffic Signal Synchronization Project.
Transit Prop A Local Return Fund 2560 – The increase of approximately $263,000 is primarily due to a decrease in the Prop A Local Return subsidy expense, offset by higher contractual services and project appropriations for the Bus Stop Real-Time Bus Arrival Project.
Transit Prop C Local Return Fund 2570 – The increase of approximately $1.4 million is due to higher contractual service costs, including costs associated with the new GTC Upgrades Project.
Transit Utility Fund 2580 – The increase of approximately $213,000 is primarily due to higher personnel costs and utilities, partially offset by a decrease in discretionary maintenance and operation costs.
Asset Forfeiture Fund 2600 – The increase of approximately $650,000 is primarily due to decrease in discretionary maintenance and operation costs, offset by higher contractual service costs for RTIC software and capital outlay for four consoles for the Command Post.
Police Fund 2610 – The net decrease of $22,000 is due to lower projected grant revenue, resulting in a decrease in personnel costs and discretionary maintenance and operation costs.
Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 2620 – The increase of $10,000 is due to higher projected revenue used towards personnel costs.
Fire Grant Fund 2650 – The increase of $281,000is due to grant appropriation that, in prior years, was not included during the budget process, but instead was appropriated during the fiscal year.
129a
5 0
9 9
Fire Mutual Aid Fund 2660 – The increase of approximately $1.2 million is due to increase in mutual aid, applied towards overtime and travel/general supplies. Nutritional Meals Grant Fund 2700 – The increase of approximately $45,000 is due to higher projected grant revenue applied towards personnel costs and general supplies, partially offset by reductions in contractual services and miscellaneous expenses.
Library Fund 2750 – The net decrease of approximately $359,000 is primarily due to a decrease in personnel costs, general supplies, and digital resources. Cable Access Fund 2800 – The decrease of $1,000 is due to a decrease in furniture and equipment.
Electric Public Benefit Fund 2910 – The net decrease of approximately $694,000 is primarily due to a reduction in contractual services and public benefit programs. New programs include the Business Customer Engagement Portal, Commercial Rebates, and the Small Business Direct Installation Program.
Debt Service Fund
There is only one Debt Service Fund appropriated for FY 2025-26 represented by the Police Building 2019 Lease Revenue Refunding Bond (Fund 3031). The net increase of approximately $4,000 is primarily due to an increase in the Principal Police Bond Payment, offset by lower interest costs on the bond.
Capital Improvement Program Funds
The approximately $12.3 million decrease in the Capital Improvement Program funds is primarily due to the following:
General Fund Capital Improvement Fund 4010 – The net increase of $5.4 million is due to increased project appropriation compared to the prior year. New projects for the upcoming fiscal year include Active Transportation Implementation Project, Parking Structure Improvements, Maple Park Gym Ceiling Replacement, Corporate Yard Renovations, and Emerald Isle Park Perimeter Wall.
Additionally, two existing projects were identified within this fund that could be defunded. Combined, this will release $9 million to the Capital Improvement Fund available fund balance, which will be transferred to the General Fund in FY 2025-26 as a budget balancing strategy.
State Gas Tax Fund 4020 – The increase of approximately $1.2 million is a result of more appropriation towards projects, including As Needed Engineering Services, Street Tree Maintenance, Capital Improvement Project Support, 139a
5 0
9 9
On Call Fiber Optic Services, and Traffic Engineering Services. Parks Mitigation Fee Fund 4050 – The net decrease of $2.0 million is due to the fund being project-based, with no appropriation made for FY 2025-26. Revenue comes from Parks Mitigation Fees and interest income.
Library Mitigation Fee Fund 4070 – There are no changes in appropriation from the prior year. The $200,000 in capital outlay is allocated towards books. CIP Reimbursement Fund 4090 – The decrease of approximately $17.1 million is due to no CIP grants expected in FY 2025-26.
Measure A Fund 4130 – The increase of $150,000 is attributed to new projects, including the Wilson Mini Park Playground Replacement.
Enterprise Funds
The approximately $12.7 million net increase in the Enterprise Funds is primarily due to the following:
Sewer Fund 5250 – The net increase of approximately $5.7 million is due to increases in personnel costs resulting from the transfer of a Project Manager position from the General Fund along with a rise in Contractual Services, which is slightly offset by a reduction in the Cost Allocation Charge. Additionally, there is an increase in projects for the CIP and maintenance and operation portion of the Los Angeles/Glendale Water Reclamation Plant Project, offset by a decrease for the Hyperion Wastewater System CIP project and the absence of new appropriation for the Citywide Sewer CCTV Inspection Project. Refuse Disposal Fund 5300 – The net increase of approximately $2.3 million is primarily driven by higher hourly wages, contractual services, fleet equipment rental charges, ITD service charges, and fleet capital outlay. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in CIP Projects. Only one new project was added for the IWM Back Up Generator.
Fiber Optic Fund 5400 – The increase of approximately $224,000 is primarily due to an increase in contractual services partially offset by a decrease in personnel costs.
Verdugo Fire Communication Fund 5800 – The net increase of approximately $532,000 is due to increases in contractual services and capital outlay, slightly offset by decreases in personnel costs and amortization expense. Electric Utility Funds 5820, 5830, 5850 & 5880 – The net increase of approximately $13.2 million is mainly due to increases in personnel costs due to 149a
5 0
9 9
the addition of four electrical line mechanic positions, one electrical line mechanic supervisor, as well as other personnel costs. Other factors include higher non- discretionary maintenance and operation costs, such as increased interest in bonds, transfers to the General Fund, ITD service charge, and depreciation. Major CIP projects include PW UOC Warehouse Roof Replacement, PM Biogas Renewable Generation Project, 4kV to 12kV Feeder Upgrade Program, and GWP Solar Design Built Project. Water Utility Funds 5920, 5930, 5950 & 5980 – The decrease of approximately $9.2 million is mainly due to reductions in capital outlay and less project appropriation. While there is an increase in personnel costs, including the addition of two new positions in new classifications, minimal necessary expenses have been budgeted pending completion of the Water Master Plan. Some major projects funded by the water utility funds include WS Grandview Ammonia System Upgrade, WS Pipeline Replacement Project, WS Tank & Reservoir Rehab Project, WS Water Quality Enhancement Program and GWP Water Meter Replacement.
Internal Service Funds
The approximately $17.2 million net increase in the Internal Service Funds is primarily due to the following:
Fleet Management Fund 6010 – The net increase of approximately $2.1 million is primarily due to increased personnel costs, vehicle maintenance expenses, fuel, and fleet capital outlay. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in depreciation.
Joint Air Support Fund 6020 – The decrease of approximately $125,000 is due to reduced vehicle maintenance costs, offset by increases in equipment expenditure and gasoline costs to support a new aircraft model expected to be delivered in October 2025.
ITD Infrastructure Fund 6030 – The net increase of approximately $220,000 is primarily due to increases in personnel costs, rent, computer hardware expenses, and capital outlay. These increases are partially offset by a reduction in contractual services.
ITD Applications Fund 6040 – The net increase of approximately $3.3 million is primarily due to increases in personnel costs, rent, contractual services, and project appropriation.
Building Maintenance Fund 6070 – The increase of approximately $2.4 million is primarily due to increase in personnel costs and increased project appropriation.
New project appropriation includes Generator Replacement at Fire Station 21, 159a
5 0
9 9
City Hall Air Handler Replacement, and Enterprise Security Video Systems Improvements.
Unemployment Insurance Fund 6100 – The increase of approximately $23,000 is due to an increase in claims.
Liability Insurance Fund 6120 – The net increase of approximately $3.3 million is primarily due to increases in excess insurance premiums, claims, ITD service charge, and cost allocation charges.
Workers Comp Insurance Fund 6140 – The net increase of approximately $1.1 million is primarily due to higher claim payments, cost allocation charges, excess insurance premiums, increased general supplies for ergonomic evaluation equipment, and expanded contractual services. Dental Insurance Fund 6150 – The decrease of approximately $37,000 is due to a decrease in claims.
Medical Insurance Fund 6160 – The increase of approximately $4.2 million is due to increased premiums and claims.
Vision Insurance Fund 6170 – The decrease of approximately $6,000 is due to a decrease in claims.
Compensated Absences Fund 6400 – The increase of approximately $961,000 is due to increase in comp time, separation, and vacation payouts. RHSP Benefits Fund 6410 – The increase of approximately $24,000 is primarily due to an increase in separation payouts.
Post-Employment Benefits Fund 6420 – The decrease of approximately $111,000 is due to decreases in retiree Medicare Part A reimbursement, medical benefits for survivors of deceased employees, and PERS replacement benefit. Wireless Fund 6600 – The decrease of approximately $103,000 is primarily due to increases in contractual services, offset by decreases in capital outlay for police radios and depreciation.
169a
5 0
9 9
AUTHORIZED FULL-TIME SALARIED POSITIONS
For FY 2025-26, seven (7) positions are proposed to be added to the authorized full-time salaried position count.
Department Position
Glendale Water & Power (1) Cross Connection Control Technician (1) Cross Connection Control Specialist
(1) Electrical Line Mechanic Supervisor
(4) Electrical Line Mechanic
The table below provides a summary of the authorized full-time salaried position count for FY 2024-25 and proposed FY 2025-26.
Current
FY 2024-25
Proposed
FY 2025-26
All Funds 1,644.0 1,651.0
General Fund 966.7* 999.0**
* Includes 35.0 defunded vacant positions
**Includes 35.0 defunded vacant positions and positions shifted from Parking Fund
PROPOSED FEES CHANGES
The FY 2025-26 Citywide Fee Schedule lists 2,010 fees administered by the City. Staff has identified and is proposing (10) fee increases in the Public Works Parking Fees section, as described in more detail below.
As part of Glendale’s ongoing parking management strategy, updates to parking rates are being proposed. The City last adjusted its rates in 2019 as part of a broader effort to align pricing with demand and convenience. This strategy emphasizes premium rates for the most desirable spaces, such as on-street parking in high-traffic areas like Brand Boulevard, while encouraging use of more readily available options such as City-owned parking garages. Although the COVID-19 pandemic temporarily disrupted parking operations, the City has since returned to normal operations and is now well- positioned to resume implementation of its original pricing framework. In setting updated rates, the City also considers benchmarks from private parking operators in Glendale to maintain both affordability and competitiveness.
To support this strategy, the proposed adjustments include increasing the hourly rate on Brand Boulevard and raising the rate on adjacent on-street and surface lots. These changes reflect the relative convenience and demand of each area and are consistent with pricing in neighboring cities like Burbank. For City-owned garages, the monthly rate and daily maximum rate would also increase. Even with these adjustments, 179a
5 0
9 9
City-owned garage rates remain below the private market average. Importantly, garages will continue to offer the first 90 minutes of parking free to all visitors. Overall, these updates are designed to improve access through greater turnover in high-demand areas while maintaining affordable options in facilities with more availability. If adopted, this is estimated to generate an additional $968,580 in parking revenue.
Service Title Current
Fee
Proposed
Fee Unit/Time
Market Place Parking (120 S. Maryland Ave) Transient
Parking Rate Maximum Fee
$9.00 $12.00 Daily
Market Place Parking (120 S. Maryland Ave) Monthly
Parking
$70.00 $90.00 Monthly
Exchange Parking (115 N. Maryland Ave) Transient
Parking Rate Maximum Fee
$9.00 $12.00 Daily
Exchange Parking (115 N. Maryland Ave) Monthly
Parking
$70.00 $90.00 Monthly
The Orange Street Parking Structure (222 N. Orange St.) Transient Parking Rate Maximum Fee
$9.00 $12.00 Daily
The Orange Street Parking Structure (222 N. Orange St.) Monthly Parking
$70.00 $90.00 Monthly
On-Street Parking Meter Rates in Downtown $1.50 $2.00 Hourly Brand Blvd. Parking Meter Rates in Downtown $2.00 $3.00 Hourly Off-Street Parking Meter Rates in Downtown $1.50 $2.00 Hourly Reserved Parking $2.00 $3.00 Hourly
These proposed changes, if approved by City Council, will be effective in FY 2025-26, and will take effect 30 days after City Council adoption.
AMENDMENT OF CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION As part of its ongoing effort to ensure an effective and equitable organizational structure, City departments periodically review job classifications, titles, and compensation levels. These reviews respond to changing operational needs, market conditions, recruitment and retention challenges, and the results of equity analyses. Any recommended changes require formal amendments to the relevant Classification and Compensation Resolutions, which are reviewed and approved by the Human Resources Department and City Manager’s Office prior to City Council consideration.
This report presents requests from Glendale Water and Power (GWP) and the IT Department. GWP proposes the creation of two new classifications to comply with recently updated state drinking water regulations, as well as the formation of an Electrical Line Mechanic crew to support upcoming infrastructure projects. 189a
5 0
9 9
The IT Department seeks to modernize job titles to improve recruitment efforts and enhance clarity.
Cross Connection Control Classifications (GWP)
This request is in response to the State Division of Drinking Water’s release of the Cross-Connection Control Policy Handbook (CCCPH), which became effective on July 1, 2024.
The CCCPH updates regulatory requirements for water agencies aimed at protecting public health by establishing standards and practices for public water systems to protect drinking water distribution systems from the backflow of undesirable liquids, gases, and substances. A key provision of this regulation is to use certified testers and specialists to manage the cross-connection control program.
Cross Connection Control Technician: This position will be responsible for inspecting and managing water systems to prevent backflow and contamination, and ensuring compliance with all applicable government regulations. The proposed top-step salary is $8,574.53 per month.
Cross Connection Control Specialist: This role will oversee and administer the cross-connection control program, which includes conducting inspections, testing, and maintenance. The Specialist will ensure full compliance with relevant regulations to safeguard the public water supply. The proposed top-step salary is $9,016.26 per month.
Electrical Line Mechanic Crew (GWP)
In the coming year, Glendale Water and Power (GWP) will complete key infrastructure projects, including the Scholl Canyon and Grayson Power Plant upgrades, and will expand solar installations to additional sites as part of Phase II—covering up to nine City locations. The Grayson Repowering Project involves replacing outdated, inefficient equipment with modern generation units and energy storage systems to improve reliability and support Glendale’s transition to cleaner energy. These significant initiatives reflect GWP’s continued investment in sustainable infrastructure and its commitment to building a more resilient and environmentally responsible utility.
To support the increasing workload associated with these projects, and to support the consistent delivery of reliable power to city residents, the addition of one (1) Electrical Line Mechanic Supervisor I and four (4) Electrical Line Mechanics is recommended.
This new crew will ensure GWP has the staffing capacity needed to safely and efficiently implement and maintain these critical energy systems. 199a
5 0
9 9
Review and Update of Class Specifications Across the City (Information Technology)
The class specification is a formal Human Resources document that describes the essential elements of a specific job classification within an organization. It typically includes:
Class title
Summary of duties and responsibilities
Distinguishing characteristics (what sets the class apart from others) Examples of essential job functions
Required knowledge, skills, and abilities
Minimum qualifications (education, experience, certifications) Working conditions or physical requirements (if applicable) The class specification serves as a foundation for recruitment, performance expectations, compensation, and classification decisions. It describes the position’s scope rather than the work of any one individual in the role. All class specifications are reviewed and approved by the Civil Service Commission.
Many of the City’s specifications haven’t been reviewed since 2020, and some go back even further. The following is an illustration of the City’s more recent efforts:
207 class specifications have been updated since 2020. 523 were last revised between 2000 and 2019.
57 haven’t been updated since before 2000.
One of Human Resources’ strategic goals is to ensure that every job classification remains current, relevant and aligned with the City’s operational needs. This process will modernize job descriptions to reflect industry standards, regulatory requirements, and workforce expectations. It will also allow us to permanently remove any obsolete or unused classifications.
To better align our technology job classifications with widely recognized industry standards, we propose to update several position titles within the IT job family. The proposed title changes reflect terminology commonly used in the private and public sectors, improving clarity around the roles, responsibilities, and progression opportunities within our IT structure. These updated titles will also enhance our ability to recruit and retain qualified candidates by making our job postings more competitive and understandable to external applicants.
Additionally, these changes support the City’s broader efforts to modernize the City's classification and compensation system. They help ensure that job titles accurately reflect the scope and complexity of the work being performed, particularly as technological needs and service expectations continue to evolve. The recommended updates do not impact salary ranges or job content but will improve internal consistency 209a
5 0
9 9
and external comparability. Approval of these changes will allow us to sunset outdated classifications and move forward with a more contemporary and market-aligned structure.
Ten new classification titles are proposed, and 1 vacant classification is recommended for deletion as this classification title is now obsolete.
Classifications to Add
New Class Title Former Class Title Bargaining Group
Service Desk Supervisor Sr PC Specialist Supervisor GMA Principal Systems Engineer Systems Engineer III GMA
Senior Systems Engineer Systems Engineer II GMA
Systems Engineer Systems Engineer I GMA
Principal Network Engineer Network Engineer III GMA
Senior Network Engineer Network Engineer II GMA
Network Engineer Network Engineer I GMA
Principal Service Desk Specialist Sr PC Specialist GCEA Senior Service Desk Specialist PC Specialist GCEA
Service Desk Specialist PC Specialist Assistant GCEA
Classification to Delete
Obsolete Class Title Bargaining Group
PC Specialist Supervisor GMA
The Resolutions proposed for Council’s approval contain the new job classifications (identified by underlining), as well as the obsolete classification proposed for elimination (identified by strikeout).
Following this update to the IT job family, Human Resources will continue working in partnership with the remaining departments to conduct a comprehensive review and update of all class specifications across the City over the next 18 months. This citywide effort is a key component of our strategic goal to ensure every classification remains current, relevant, and aligned with the City’s evolving operational and workforce needs.
By collaborating closely with each department, HR will modernize job descriptions to reflect industry standards, regulatory requirements, and emerging service expectations.
This process will also identify opportunities to consolidate or eliminate outdated classifications and strengthen internal consistency across the City’s classification structure. Monthly updates will be provided to the Civil Service Commission as revised specifications are brought forward for approval.
219a
5 0
9 9
SUMMARY
The above requests are incorporated into amended Classification and Compensation Resolutions as follows:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 18 Glendale City Employees Association (GCEA)/Hourly/Confidential Glendale Management Association (GMA) and GMA Employee Relations Exempt
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolutions amending the Classification and Compensation Resolutions to establish new classifications, update IT job titles, and delete obsolete classifications as detailed in this report.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARD PROGRAMS
At the City Council Budget Study Session on June 4, 2025, GWP received direction from City Council regarding the proposed Public Benefit Programs (PBC) and Low Carbon Fuel Standard Programs (LCFS) two-year plan. For the upcoming two-year program cycle, staff will continue to incorporate City Council’s guidance to refine and enhance the programs portfolio.
The table on the following page summarizes the proposed annual budget for PBC-funded programs budget for the period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2027.
The proposed PBC budget is $9.35 million for FY 2025-26, and $11.4 million for FY 2026-27, supporting a total of 15 programs. In addition to the proposed FY 2025-26 new appropriation, there is approximately $3.4 million available in the over-collected PBC fees authorized by Resolution 24-164 that will carry over from year to year until all funds are expended. Therefore, the total available appropriation in PBC funds in FY 2025-26 is $12.7 million.
229a
5 0
9 9
The table below summarizes the proposed annual budget for LCFS-funded programs budget for the period from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2027.
STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable
TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMSFY 25-26FY 26-27 EVSE Infrastructure 500$ 1,000$
Residential EV Charging Station Rebate Program75$ 75$ Commercial & Multi-Family EV Charging Station Rebate
Program 1,000$ 1,000$
Pre-Owned EV Rebate Program (New) -$ 500$
Clean Fuel Rewards Program 300$ -$
Web Based EV Customer Awareness Platform27$ 27$
Electric Vehicle and Electric Bicycle Guest Drive Events140$ 50$ Electric Bicycle Rebate Program 40$ 50$
Vehicle to Grid Study (New) -$ 150$
TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES/BUDGET2,082$ 2,852$
PROPOSED BUDGET ($1000s)
239a
5 0
9 9
FISCAL IMPACT
FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget
The table below depicts the total City appropriations by fund type as adopted for FY 2024-25 and as proposed for FY 2025-26.
Total Appropriations
A summary of revenues and appropriations for all funds can be found in Exhibits 1 and 2 respectively.
Amendment to the Citywide Fee Schedule
If City Council adopts the parking fee changes to the fee schedule in accordance with staff recommendations, the estimated potential revenue impact would be approximately $1.0 million to the General Fund.
FY 2024-25 Resolution of Appropriation – Parking Fund Collapse A resolution of appropriation is being requested to transfer $1,600,000 from the Parking Fund (2210) fund balance to the General Fund (1010) due to the collapsing of the Parking Fund (2210) into the General Fund (1010), as well as $3,732,643 from the Parking Fund (2210) fund balance to the Capital Improvement Fund (4010) for the funding of new and existing projects that will be carried over from the Parking Fund (2210) into the Capital Improvement Fund (4010). The transfers are due to the collapsing of the Parking Fund (2210) into the General Fund (1010) as of June 30, 2025.
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $1,600,000 GL: 24246-2210-PWD GL: 25300-1010-0000 Parking Fund $3,732,643 GL: 24246-2210-PWD GL: 24243-4010-0000 Parking Fund
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Adopted Proposed %
Fund Type (In Thousands) FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Increase /
(Decrease) Change
General Fund $ 325,660 $ 352,480 $ 26,820 8.2% Special Revenue Funds 152,242 139,709 (12,533) (8.2%)
Debt Service Funds 2,995 2,999 4 0.1%
Capital Improvement Funds 33,282 20,966 (12,316) (37.0%) Enterprise Funds 544,159 556,835 12,676 2.3%
Internal Service Funds 146,048 163,276 17,228 11.8%
Citywide Total $ 1,204,386 $1,236,265 $ 31,879 2.6%
249a
5 0
9 9
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subject to CEQA review.
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
In accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance, the names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with 10% interest or more in the company proposed for contract or amendment in this Agenda Item Report as set forth in Exhibit 3.
ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager/Interim Director of Finance Paula Adams, Chief Human Resource Officer
Scott Mellon, Acting General Manager
Prepared by:
Shu-Jun Li, Assistant Director of Finance
Aymee Martin, Assistant Director of Human Resources
Karina Cervantes, Budget Manager
Linda Moossaian, Revenue Manager
Adrine Gdakian, Budget Analyst
Jenik Keshishians, Budget Analyst
Leo Torosian, Budget Analyst
Ruzan Soloyan, Clean Energy Officer
Approved by:
Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Summary of Revenues by Fund
Exhibit 2: Summary of Appropriations by Fund
Exhibit 3: Campaign Finance Disclosure Information