Agenda packet, first session — Glendale City Council, September 30, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

PLEASE SILENCE CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION Viewing of City Council Meetings
:
•
In-person – City Council Chambers, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 •
Live Broadcast via Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U-verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed on the City webpage, glendaleca.gov/live
, on
YouTube.com/myglendale
, and on the Cablecast app under "Glendale TV". Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at
glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

City Council meeting agenda packets, any agenda related documents, and additional documents are available at City Hall and online for public viewing on the City’s website:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/public-meeting-portal ADA Accessibility and Translation Services
:

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

The

City

Clerk’

office

should

notified

72 hours

(three
business

days)

soon

practicable

for

requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and
Braille

transcription

services;

please

direct

all

accessibility

requests

(818)

548-2090.

For
translations,

please

specify

the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

of
City

provided

interpreters

not

required

and

persons

are

welcome

use

their

own

interpreter

or
speak in their native language.

Public participation in Council meetings may occur as follows :
•
In-person – City Council Chambers
•
T elephonic participation: Call (818) 937-8100
If you have any questions about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance including agenda email notification, please contact the City Clerk’s Office via email at [email protected], or by phone at (818) 548-2090.

1 TYPED 9/25/2025 8:56:23 PM
09 30 25
CC

PUBLIC COMMENT GUIDELINES
The City Council welcomes public input at City Council meetings. Public input at Council meetings is regulated by the City Council’s Rules of Order, Procedure and Decorum for the Conduct of City Council Meetings as set forth in Resolution No. 25-76, which will be summarized below.

Written Comments and Documents
:

Public comments received in writing will NOT be read aloud at the meeting but will be part of the meeting record. Written public comments can be emailed to [email protected], and will be uploaded to the City website as an attachment to the agenda item. When submitting a public comment, please make sure to include the following
:

1. Name (optional); and

2. Agenda item to which you are submitting public comment

3. Submit no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the City Council meeting. Correspondence received after this time may not be distributed until the following business day.

All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Public Comments During Council Meeting
:

Public Comments during Community Event Announcements, First and Second Periods of Oral Communications and agenda items will be governed as provided in the descriptions for those items on the agenda below. Pursuant to State law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on any item not appearing on the meeting agenda, except that members of the City Council or staff may ask a question for clarification or briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising public testimony rights (Government Code Section 54954.2). Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

Submitting Speaker Cards or Calling In for Public Comment :

Speaker cards must be submitted and telephonic participants must call in and be in the call-in queue as follows:
•
Community Event Announcements or First or Second Period of Oral Communications: PRIOR TO the commencement of the specific comment period
•
Consent Calendar Items: BEFORE a motion is made on the consent calendar •
Other agenda items, including Action items: PRIOR to the completion of the verbal staff report (unless waived by the Mayor)
Any audio-visual files displayed by speakers must be emailed to the Clerk’s office by 12:00 pm on the day before a Council meeting.

2 TYPED 9/25/2025 8:56:23 PM
09 30 25
CC

SEPTEMBER 30, 2025

ROLL CALL

1. CLOSED SESSION
– 1:00 PM (T o Commence at 6:00 PM
)
a.

Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Central BWB LLC v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 25STCP01018; Central BWB LLC v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 25STCP01144

Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivisions (d)(2) and (e)(3) of Government Code Section 54956.9: One potential case

Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Bradley Calvert, Onnig Bulanikian and Mark Berry. Property Location: 309 Orange Street. Negotiating Parties: MGP XII Glendale Central LLC, an affiliate of Merlone Geier Partners.

Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of payment for the acquisition of property
d.

Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Jeff Brooks and Mark Berry. Property Location: 1000 N. Brand Blvd. Negotiating Parties: 1000 N.

Brand LLC. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of payment for the acquisition of property

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
– 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a.

Flag Salute: Council Member
b.

Invocation:

W
ill be delivered by Pastor Jonathan Henderson, Vallejo Drive Church of Seventh-day Adventists.
c.

Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the September 30, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on September 26, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.

Proclamation declaring September 27, 2025 as Native American Day b.

Proclamation declaring September as National Hispanic Heritage Month

4. CONSENT ITEMS
(Including Minutes)
The following are routine and may be acted upon by one motion. Any Member of Council or the audience requesting separate consideration may do so by making such request before motion is proposed.
a.

City Clerk, re:

Minutes of the Regular City Council Meetings of September 9, 2025 b.

Public Works, re:

Final Map for Tract No. 84200, for a 6-unit Residential Condominium Subdivision at 354 W. Wilson Avenue

3 TYPED 9/25/2025 8:56:23 PM
09 30 25
CC

1. Resolution approving the Final Map for Tract No. 84200, for a 6-unit residential condominium subdivision at 354 W. Wilson Avenue c.

Police Department, re: 2025-26 Grant from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety for the Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program

1. Motion to accept grant funds in the amount of $40,000 from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant d.

Police Department, re: 2025-26 Grant from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement Program, for distracted driving, Vehicle Code, bicycle, pedestrian, and driving under the influence violations

1. Motion to accept grant funds in the amount of $350,000 from the California Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement Program and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant
e.

Community Services and Parks, re:

Funding for eClean Technologies, LLC

1. Motion authorizing City Manager or designee to (1) amend the contract with eClean T echnologies, LLC to include an option for the City to purchase 33 units of aqueous ozone equipment at the end of the 36-month rental term, for a new total contract amount not to exceed $307,500, (2) exercise the City’s purchase option, and (3) enter into a contract with eClean for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of aqueous ozone equipment purchased by the City in an amount not to exceed $12,000 annually

2. Resolution of appropriation in the amount $101,400 to continue renting with the option to purchase aqueous ozone equipment
f.

Public Works, re: Assignment of the “Agreement for Business and Multi-Family Solid Waste Collection Services in Zone C” Contract R107072 between the City of Glendale and Waste Resource Technologies, Inc

1. Resolution authorizing Assignment of the Agreement for Business and Multi-Family Solid Waste Collection Service in Zone C from Waste Resource T echnologies, Inc. (Contract R107072) to Waste Management of California, Inc. (WM) g.

City Attorney, re:

Request for Conflict of Interest Waiver in Legal Representation by Holland & Hart LLP
a. Motion Authorizing the City Attorney to Consent to the Southern California Public Power Authority’s (SCPPA) Execution of a Conflict of Interest Waiver for Holland & Hart LLP for an unrelated matter and for future SCPPA conflict waivers for unrelated matters

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
(Including reports from conferences and regional
meetings)

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
(3-minutes per speaker)
Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

4 TYPED 9/25/2025 8:56:23 PM
09 30 25
CC

agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

8. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.

City Attorney, re: Ordinance Amending Glendale Municipal Code provisions regarding meetings, powers and duties of the Commission on the Status of Women

1. Adoption of Ordinance Amending Sections 2.38.090 and 2.38.140 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 – Relating to the Commission on the Status of Women

9. ACTION ITEMS
a.

Glendale Water and Power, re: Amendment to Electric Rates Ordinance to Implement Adjusted and Redistributed Electric Rates

1. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 6025 Establishing the Electric Rates for Glendale Water & Power for Fiscal Years 2024 to 2028 to Implement Adjusted and Redistributed Electric Rates Increases effective November 1, 2025, November 1, 2026 and November 1, 2027
b.

Fire Department, re: Request to Establish a Standardization of Specialized Gurney Equipment Manufactured by Ferno Washington
a. Resolution to adopt the standardization policy and authorize the purchase of gurneys and gurney maintenance and repair supplies from Ferno Washington c.

Management Services, re: Appointment of Voting Delegate and Alternative Representative for the 2025 League of California Cities Conference a. Motion designating a voting delegate and alternate representative(s) for the 2025 League of California Cities Conference
d.

City Attorney, re:

Status Update on the Activities of the Charter Review Committee Pertaining to Council Districts, Directly Elected Mayor, Council Compensation and Miscellaneous Matters

1. Motion Providing Direction

10. HEARINGS
a.

Community Development, re: Public Hearing Regarding Request for Approval of a Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, Pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law, to Construct a New 43-unit Residential Housing Development Project, Located at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Providing a Total of Nine Affordable Units, Including a Total of Six Reserved for Very Low Income Households and Three Reserved for Moderate Income Households (Density Bonus Housing Plan Case No. PDBP-003898-2024)

1. Motion to approve Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan

2. Motion to deny Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan

11. REPORTS - INFORMATION

12. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

13. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

5 TYPED 9/25/2025 8:56:23 PM
09 30 25
CC

14. SECOND PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to items NOT a part of this agenda. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes.

Council may question or respond to the speaker, but there will be no debate or decision. The City Manager may refer the matter to the appropriate department for investigation and report.

15. NEW BUSINESS

16. ADJOURNMENT

6 TYPED 9/25/2025 8:56:23 PM
09 30 25
CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
SEPTEMBER 9, 2025
Revised
Changed time for Closed Session
Added item 13a
ROLL CALL – Present: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian – Absent: Gharpetian, Kassakhian

1. CLOSED SESSION – 3:01 PM
a. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation. Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9:

One Potential Case
b. Public Employment – Attorneys
c. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Central BWB LLC v.

City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 25STCP01018; Central BWB LLC v. City of Glendale et al., L.A.S.C. Case No. 25STCP01144 d. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivisions (d)(2) and (e)(3) of Government Code Section 54956.9: Two Potential Cases
e. Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators:

Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Bradley Calvert, Onnig Bulanikian and Mark Berry. Property Location: 309 Orange Street. Negotiating Parties: MGP XII Glendale Central LLC, an affiliate of Merlone Geier Partners. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of payment for the acquisition of property f. Conference with Labor Negotiators. The City-designated negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Paula Adams, Peter Brown, Jack Liang, and Scott Mellon. The name of the employee organizations is: I.B.E.W., Local 18 City Attorney, Michael Garcia, stated Council anticipates reporting out on item 1b.

Council recessed to Closed Session at 3:02 PM.

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:08 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Najarian
b. Invocation: Worshipful Vram Martirosyan, Glendale Masonic Lodge No. 368 c. Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the September 9, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on September 5, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
7 of 334

a. Proclamation declaring September as Suicide Prevention Month John O’Malley, President, NAMI Glendale
Ann Marie Smith, Member-at-Large–Outreach & Awareness, NAMI Glendale Reg Clarkina, Operations Manager, NAMI Glendale

4. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are routine and may be acted upon by one motion. Any Member of Council or the audience requesting separate consideration may do so by making such request before motion is proposed.

Item 4f was pulled for separate consideration.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of August 26, 2025 and City Council Meeting of August 26, 2025
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b. Public Works, re: Authorization for the City Clerk to Set the Time, Date, and Place of a Public Hearing for the Conditional Vacation of a Portion of the First Alley Easterly of Central Avenue, Southerly of California Avenue, Westerly of Orange Street (Alley 239) for the proposed 236 N. Central Avenue Project, Vacation Case No. 192V

1. Motion Authorizing the City Clerk to Set a Public Hearing for the Subject Alley Vacation
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
c. Finance, re: Designation of Authorized Representatives for FEMA and Cal OES Disaster Assistance

1. Resolution [25-132] to designate City Manager, Director of Finance, and Assistant Director of Finance as authorized representatives to apply and obtain disaster assistance from FEMA and Cal OES when major disasters strike
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:
8 of 334

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
d. Community Services and Parks, re: Acceptance of Federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act funds from the State of California, Employment Development Department and award of contracts to the Glendale Youth Alliance and the City of Burbank
Motion:

1. Accepting the Federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) funds in the amount of $848,928 from the State of California, Employment Development Department; and authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding

2. Authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute a Contract with Glendale Youth Alliance in an amount not to exceed $703,428 from the WIOA federal grant for the period of July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026

3. Authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute a Contract with City of Burbank in an amount not to exceed $145,500 from the WIOA federal grant for the period of July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
e. Community Services and Parks, re: Acceptance of Youth@Work funds from the Los Angeles County, Department of Economic Opportunity and award of contract to Glendale Youth Alliance
Motion:

1. Accepting the Youth@Work funds from the Los Angeles County, Department of Economic Opportunity in the amount of $353,100; and authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to accept and implement the funding, subject to the approval by the City Attorney

2. Authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to enter into and execute a Contract with Glendale Youth Alliance in an amount not to exceed $326,618 from the Youth@Work grant for the period of July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026, subject to the approval by the City Attorney, subject to the approval by the City Attorney
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None
9 of 334

Absent: None
Abstain: None
f. Public Works, re: Amend Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Preparation of Design and Construction Documents for Fremont Park Renovation Project
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks

1. Motion authorizing an amendment to PSA No. C106224 with David Volz Design Landscaping Architects, increasing the contract amount by $35,000 for a total not-to- exceed amount of $1,333,214
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

5. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Gharpetian attended three Tech Week events and the Alex Theatre’s 100th anniversary celebration. He noted that the International Chess Tournament was well attended and emphasized that many positive things are happening in Glendale.

Councilmember Kassakhian congratulated the organizers of the International Chess Tournament and expressed hope that Glendale will continue to host this event in the future. He explained that he had to leave the previous Council meeting due to health reasons and thanked the Glendale firefighters who transported him to the hospital. He congratulated Holy Family School on its upcoming centennial and asked staff to look into whether private security companies are properly registering with the City as required by Code. He also requested that the meeting be adjourned in memory of Marilyn “Lynne” Agnes Raggio and former Glendale City Clerk Doris Twedt, offering condolences and reflections on their lives and legacies.

Councilmember Asatryan recognized Armen Ambartsoumian of the American Chess Academy, who was in attendance, and thanked the Academy and City staff for their work on the International Chess Tournament. She announced that the Wine Festival will be held in Glendale this year on October 12, 2025, from 3:00 to 9:00 PM on Orange Street by the Arts Center. She also attended the 10 of 334

Alex Theatre’s 100th anniversary celebration and asked staff to follow up with consultants regarding public relations support for the centennial events.

Councilmember Brotman reported that, as Chair of the Burbank-Glendale- Pasadena Regional Housing Trust, he oversaw a successful application for a competitive grant under the Low Income Housing Trust Fund program. The Trust contributed $4 million in Measure S funds, which was matched by the grant, providing $8 million in total to be used for a future affordable housing project.

Mayor Najarian highlighted the opening night of the Armenian Film Festival at the Alex Theatre. He announced that the 2nd Annual Women’s Equality event will be held tomorrow, September 10, 2025, at 5:00 PM at the Alex Theatre and is sold out. He also shared that the Land Use Element will be presented again at the Glendale Police Montrose Substation (3600 Ocean View Blvd., Suite #11) on Saturday, September 13, 2025, from 12:00 to 1:00 PM. He encouraged the public to attend and noted that the deadline for submitting comments and questions has been extended indefinitely. Lastly, he reported attending the Contract Cities Association Fall Educational Summit in Oceanside, California, and shared his remarks.

6. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

No callers or speaker cards.

7. FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30- minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non- agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Speaking time was reduced to two minutes.

Mike Mohill
Tony Passarella
Cameron Nadles
Ejmin Hakobian
Lisa Cusack
Herbert Molano
Damian Sullivan
Lisa Murris
Catherine Yesayan
Allan Durham
Armen Ambartsoumian
Archie Melik
Robert Thomsen
11 of 334

Christina Barcena

8. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a. Management Services, re: Local Amendments to the California Building and Energy Code to require projects in single-family homes, duplexes and townhomes involving replacement or alteration (but not repair) of an existing air conditioning system or installation of new air conditioning systems to either include a heat pump space conditioner as the primary heating system, or install specific energy efficiency measures in addition to a new air conditioner
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Public Speakers:

Patrick Murphy
Jesus Rojas
Beth Brooks

1. Motion Directing Staff to Include Provisions in the Local Amendments to the 2025 California Building and Energy Code to Be Considered by the Council in the Fall of 2025 That Would Require Energy Conservation Measures for Air Conditioner Alterations, Replacements and Installations in Existing Single-Family Homes, Duplexes and Townhomes
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Kassakhian
Noes: Gharpetian, Najarian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. An Ordinance of the Council of the City of Glendale, California Amending the 2022 Glendale Building and Safety Code, Volume IX (Green Building Standards), to Require Energy Conservation Measures for Air Conditioner Alterations, Replacements and Installations in Existing Single-Family Residential Buildings

9. ACTION ITEMS
a. City Attorney, re: Ordinance Amending Glendale Municipal Code provisions regarding meetings, powers and duties of the Commission on the Status of Women (Moved from August 26, 2025, Council Meeting)
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
12 of 334

Public Speakers:

Debra Suh
Regina Williams
Jane Viar
Diane Lambillotte
Beth Broks
Dr. Sophia Armen
Lilya Avagyan
Denise Miller
Nayiri Nahabedian
Mike

1. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Sections 2.38.090 and 2.38.140 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 – Relating to the Commission on the Status of Women
Councilmember Asatryan introduced the revised Ordinance with Councilmember Asatryan's comments on the proposed Ordinance submitted on August 26, 2025.
b. Management Services, re: Programs or Partnerships to Address Health and Social Challenges Affecting Men
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presentation:

Elena Bolbolian, Chief Innovation Officer
Public Speakers:

Dr. Sophia Armen

1. Motion Directing Staff
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Kassakhian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
c. Glendale Water and Power, re: Key Considerations and Refinements to the Clean Energy Programs Plan Funded by Public Benefit Charge and Low Carbon Fuel Standard for Fiscal Years 25-26 and 26-27 (Moved from August 26, 2025, Council Meeting)
13 of 334

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Scott Mellon, General Manager, Glendale Water and Power Public Speakers:

Herbert Molano

1. Resolution [25-133] authorizing Glendale Water & Power (GWP) staff to implement programs consistent with the outlined refinements to the Glendale Water and Power Clean Energy Programs Plan funded by Public Benefit Charge (PBC) and Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) for Fiscal Years (FY) 25-26 and FY 26-27

2. Resolution [25-134] of Appropriation requesting $200,000 for the vehicle-to- everything (V2X) study supporting a potential pilot program Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Kassakhian
Noes: Gharpetian, Najarian

Absent: None
Abstain: None
d. Public Works, re: Dispensing with Competitive Bidding and Awarding a Contract for Operation and Maintenance of the City’s Schneider Electric Building Management Systems and Software including EcoStruxure and StruxureWare Building Operations / Andover Continuum (Andover) Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Herbert Molano

1. Resolution [25-135] dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute a contract with Schneider Electric Buildings Americas, Inc., (Schneider Electric) for the operation and maintenance of the city’s Andover Building Management Systems for 5 years in an amount not to exceed $825,000
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
14 of 334

Noes: Kassakhian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

10. HEARINGS
a. Community Development, re: Appeal of Design Review Board’s approval of DRB Case No. PDR-004219-2024 located at 906 Whitehaven Terrace to add an 1,865 square-foot (SF) two-story addition and change the architectural style of the existing 1,938 SF single-story single-family residence with an attached 3-car garage constructed in 1973 on a 11,770 SF interior lot in the R1R-III (Restricted Residential Zone, Floor Area District III).

Mayor Najarian opened the hearing at 9:47 PM and closed the hearing at 11:09 PM.

Councilmembers Kassakhian, Asatryan, Brotman, and Gharpetian noted for the record that they met with the applicant and appellants and visited the site.

Mayor Najarian noted for the record that he refused meetings with the applicant and appellants.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Bradley Calvert, Director, Community Development Department Presentation:

Eric Ji, Planning Associate
Public Speakers:

Harry Akopian, Architect, Applicant
Talin Mazmanian, Owner, Applicant
Argineh Galstyan, Appellant
Michael Michaelian. Appellant
Razmik Tatos
Tigran Unamian
Martin Galstyan, Appellant

1. Motion to Sustain Design Review Board’s Decision to Approve the Project with Conditions of Approval
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Najarian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian Noes: None
15 of 334

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. Motion to Continue the Matter, Directing the City Attorney to Draft Findings Reversing the Design Review Board’s Decision and Denying the Project Councilmember Kassakhian left the meeting at 11:19 PM.

11. REPORTS - INFORMATION

12. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

13. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS
a. Councilmember Gharpetian’s Request for a Report on the North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project
Public Speakers:

Allan Durham
Allen Dish
Anonymous
Motion to consider item 13a.

Moved: Gharpetian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian
Noes: Najarian

Absent: Kassakhian
Abstain: None

14. SECOND PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to items NOT a part of this agenda. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes. Council may question or respond to the speaker, but there will be no debate or decision. The City Manager may refer the matter to the appropriate department for investigation and report.

Patrick Murphy
Allen Dish
Beth Brooks
Paul
Edwin
Anonymous

15. NEW BUSINESS

16. ADJOURNMENT by Consensus in memoriam of Marilyn “Lynne” Agnes Raggio and former Glendale City Clerk Doris Twedt – 12:18 AM
16 of 334

Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
17 of 334

4b
25-88736

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Final Map for Tract No. 84200, for a 6-unit Residential Condominium Subdivision at 354 W. Wilson Avenue.

1. Resolution approving the Final Map for Tract No. 84200, for a 6-unit residential condominium subdivision at 354 W. Wilson Avenue.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approval of a Final Map is requested for the subdivision of Tract Map No. 84200 for the following applicant to create a proposed new 6-unit residential condominium project at 354 W. Wilson Avenue.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution recommending the Final Map for Tract No. 84200, for a new 6- unit residential condominium subdivision at 354 W. Wilson Avenue.

ANALYSIS
On April 3, 2024, the Tentative Map for Tract No. 84200 for a proposed new 6-unit residential condominium subdivision at 354 W. Wilson Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Glendale subject to compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, other applicable State statutes, Chapters 16.32 (Final Maps) and 16.16 (New Condominiums) of Title 16 and Title 30 of the Glendale Municipal Code, as well as forty- nine conditions of approval.

The Final Map for Tract No. 84200 is now ready for approval by the City Council.

All conditions of approval of the Tentative Map have been met and the Final Map has been found by the Planning Division to be in general conformance with the Tentative Map.

Accordingly, the Director of Community Development and the Deputy Director of Public 18 of 334

4b2
25-88736
6 3
4 4
Works/City Engineer recommend the approval of the Final Map.

Subdivider: Arthur Longuryan, My West LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, 610 S. Broadway #608, Los Angeles, CA 90014

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The project is exempt from CEQA review as a Class 32 “Infill Development” exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines, because the project meets all the conditions of an in-fill development project.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Do not approve the Final Map for Tract No. 84200. The availability of additional residential condominium units will not be increased.

2. The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Ruel Villaluna, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
19 of 334

4b
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 84200, FOR A NEW 6-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION AT 354 W. WILSON AVENUE WHEREAS, the Final Map of Tract No. 84200 has been submitted and meets the requirements as set forth in California Government Code Sections 66433, et seq. and is now ready for approval by the City Council; WHEREAS, the City has received a copy of the Title Report and the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions establishing a Homeowner’s Association and same has been reviewed and found to be in an acceptable form; WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development and the Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer have found said Final Map to be in general conformance with the tentative map and have certified same as meeting all conditions of approval of the tentative map;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1.Based on the staff report of the Director of Public Works dated September 30, 2025, the certifications of the Director of Community Development and Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer; the written and oral testimonies and exhibits thereto, the City Council hereby finds that the Final Map of Tract No. 84200 meets all the conditions of approval of the tentative map, is in general conformance with said tentative map, and as such is hereby approved.

SECTION 2.The City Clerk is hereby instructed to endorse in due form, such approval upon said Map and affix a City seal thereto and certify the passage of this Resolution.

Adopted this _____ day of ____________, 2025.
____________________________
Mayor, City of Glendale
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

CITY OF GLENDALE )
20 of 334

24b
3 2
1 9
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _________________, 2025, the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain: ___________________________
City Clerk
21 of 334

22 of 334

4c
25-88810

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: 2025-26 Grant from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety for the Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
To accept $40,000 in grant funds from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program, for motorcycle training for the public and law enforcement to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in motorcycle crashes
23 of 334

4c2
25-88810
6 3
7 3

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached motion accepting $40,000 in grant funds from the Office of Traffic Safety for the Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant.

ANALYSIS
The City of Glendale Police Department has a longstanding tradition of proactive enforcement with respect to traffic related issues, including efforts directed at motorcycle safety and education. Between 2021 and 2022, Los Angeles County had 120 motorcycle related deaths, the highest number of motorcyclist fatalities in the State.

The 2021-2022 crash statistics reported an increased fatality rate of nearly three (3) percent over the previous year and that Los Angeles County also had the highest number of seriously injured motorcyclists in the State. The Glendale Police Department believes additional education and training will increase motorcycle riders skills and reduce motorcycle related accidents.

In January 2025, staff submitted a grant request to the California Office of Traffic Safety for funding to create a program designed to minimize the number of motorcycle related crashes on our roadways. The City was awarded grant funding in the amount of $40,000.

The grant period is between October 1, 2025 and September 30, 2026 and the funds will be used for the following:
Four free public motorcyclist safety and training courses; Eight advanced motorcycle training courses for law enforcement personnel; One month of participation in motorcycle safety month in May 2026.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Participation in this program provides the Glendale Police Department the ability to educate the public regarding the best practices and techniques to safely ride and operate a motorcycle on the roadway.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY 2025-26 State of California Office of Traffic Safety Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program award in the amount of $40,000, which was approved as a part of the FY 2025-26 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$32,357 GL: 41100-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01487AG
Police Fund - Labor
$1,143 GL: 44550-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01487AG
Police Fund – Travel
24 of 334

4c3
25-88810
6 3
7 3
$1,500 GL: 45350-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01487AG
Police Fund – Supplies
$5,000 GL: 45682-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01487AG
Police – Misc.

Department Cost Center Program
Police Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subjected to CEQA/NEPA review. There is no possibility that the acceptance of this award may have a significant effect on the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3))

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Deny the Police Department’s request. If the request is denied, the Police Department will not be able to utilize the grant funding for motorcycle education and training operations.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Manuel Cid, Police Chief
Prepared by:

Peter Robinson, Police Lieutenant
Ryan Gunn, Police Sergeant
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
25 of 334

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Accepts grant funds in the amount of $40,000 from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, Motorcycle Safety Education and Training Program; and

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
26 of 334

4d
25-88811

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: 2025-26 Grant from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement Program, for distracted driving, Vehicle Code, bicycle, pedestrian, and driving under the influence violations.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
To accept $350,000 in grant funds from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement Program, for distracted driving, Vehicle Code, bicycle, pedestrian, and driving under the influence violations. 27 of 334

4d2
25-88811
6 3
7 4

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached motion accepting $350,000 in grant funds from the Office of Traffic Safety for the "Selective Traffic Enforcement Program" to be conducted by the Glendale Police Department and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant.

ANALYSIS
The California Office of Traffic Safety for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program uses best practice strategies to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.

In January 2025, the Police Department submitted a grant request to the California Office of Traffic Safety for a program designed to increase enforcement that concentrates in the areas of speed violations and distracted driving. After reviewing the proposal through a competitive process, the Office of Traffic Safety advised that the City of Glendale is eligible for $350,000 in funding for this program. The city will utilize the majority of the grant funding for specialized field operations. Specifically, the city will use the funds to pay for overtime for police officers, police services officers, support staff, and supervisors when engaged in field-based education and enforcement activities between October 1, 2025 and September 30, 2026 for the following enforcement operations:
Four DUI/Driver’s License checkpoints;
Fifteen saturation patrols concentrating on impaired driving; Ten traffic enforcement operations, including but not limited to, primary collision factor violations;
Eight enforcement operations will focus on distracted driving (cell phone use/texting) violations;
Four “Know Your Limits” alcohol consumption education operations; Two DUI collaborative enforcement operations;
Four Community Collaboration Engagement objectives;
Four traffic safety educational presentations to the community.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Participation in this program provides the Glendale Police Department the ability to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve its effectiveness through training and development of new strategies.
28 of 334

4d3
25-88811
6 3
7 4

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY2025-26 State of California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Program award in the amount of $350,000, which was approved as a part of the FY 2025-26 budget. No new appropriation is being requested at this time. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$323,838 GL: 41100-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01488AG
Police Fund - Labor
$4,541 GL: 44550-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01488AG
Police Fund – Travel
$13,600 GL: 43110-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01488AG
Police Fund – Contractual
Services
$6,021 GL: 45350-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01488AG
Police – Supplies
$2,000 GL: 45681-2610-GPD-0020
PL: GPD01488AG
Police – Meetings
Department Cost Center Program
Police Projects

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Manuel Cid, Police Chief
Prepared by:

Peter Robinson, Police Lieutenant
Ryan Gunn, Police Sergeant
29 of 334

4d4
25-88811
6 3
7 4
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
30 of 334

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby:

1. Accepts grant funds in the amount of $350,000 from the California Office of Traffic Safety, Selective Traffic Enforcement Program; and

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
31 of 334

4e
25-88833

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Funding for eClean Technologies, LLC

1. Motion authorizing City Manager or designee to (1) amend the contract with eClean Technologies, LLC to include an option for the City to purchase 33 units of aqueous ozone equipment at the end of the 36-month rental term, for a new total contract amount not to exceed $307,500, (2) exercise the City’s purchase option, and (3) enter into a contract with eClean for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of aqueous ozone equipment purchased by the City in an amount not to exceed $12,000 annually.

2. Resolution of appropriation in the amount $101,400 to continue renting with the option to purchase aqueous ozone equipment.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community Services & Parks Department Department (CSP or Department) has been using aqueous ozone to clean and sanitize restrooms in public parks and park facilities since 2023. In a pilot study of the equipment, staff reported that use of the system at two parks, Brand Park and the Sports Complex, successfully deodorized and neutralized any elements that may cause a foul smell. Thus, in 2023, Council approved an agreement with eClean Technologies, LLC (eClean) to expand the use of the equipment at all parks. The Department has been renting 31 aqueous ozone units, along with two mobile pressure washers, and, based on their performance, recommends purchasing the equipment for long-term use.

A total of $163,850 is necessary to continue renting the equipment through January 2027 and exercise the City’s option to purchase the units for $100 each, or $3,300 total. At this time, staff requests that the Council appropriate $101,400 in the current fiscal year to continue renting the equipment, while the remaining funds will be appropriated in future fiscal years to complete the rental and purchase the equipment. Purchasing the equipment would result in a $12,000/year maintenance agreement, which would be appropriated in future years as part of the budget planning process. 32 of 334

4e2
25-88833
6 3
9 1

RECOMMENDATION
That City Council appropriate $101,400 this fiscal year to continue renting the aqueous ozone equipment, with an option to purchase the units at the end of the contract term.

The remaining funds will be appropriated in future years as part of the budget process.

ANALYSIS
In its continued effort to run a sustainable operation and be environmentally friendly, the Park Services Section of CSP evaluated the use of aqueous ozone to clean and sanitize restrooms in public parks and park facilities.

Aqueous ozone is a strong oxidizer proven to effectively kill germs, bacteria, viruses, and contaminants, while leaving no residue or harmful waste on surfaces. It is used in lieu of cleaning solutions to sanitize and disinfect surfaces and is effective on glass, mirrors, walls, restrooms, and other touch points. It has the cleaning power comparable to EPA-registered, hospital-grade disinfectants and has been tested against a broad range of bacteria and viruses, including, but not limited to, E. Coli, Salmonella, Aspergillus, various bacteria, and other harmful pathogens. This cleaning solution is a better, environmentally friendly option than continuing to purchase other surface cleaners consisting of harsh chemicals packaged in plastic.

In September 2022, CSP entered into an agreement with eClean Technologies, LLC, to conduct a pilot study of the equipment. The agreement included the installation and temporary use of equipment, at no cost to the City, at two park restrooms: Brand Park and the Sports Complex. The equipment was installed in the restrooms with the support of Public Works Facilities staff. The system utilizes water to create aqueous ozone (O3), and with a simple hose hook-up, staff can wash down the restrooms and fixtures.

Aqueous ozone is 100% sustainable.

The results of the pilot study were positive and staff reported that the use of the system at these two parks successfully deodorized and neutralized any elements that may cause a foul smell. Application from the wall mounted unit is simple and effective, saving staff time for routine sanitizations and reducing the need to use chemicals such as bleach or other harmful disinfectants. The aqueous ozone remains effective for about 20 minutes and then self-neutralizes and returns to being tap water once again.

Each unit improves operational efficiency because of the numerous benefits associated with the standalone compact system:
• Can be connected to standard plumbing and provide aqueous ozone without compromising water pressure and flow;
• Can be connected directly to a hose with spray nozzle; • Can offer a variety of water outputs from a single unit; • Can produce the exact amount of ozone at point-of-use; • Can produce consistent ozone levels ranging from 15 to 600 gallons per hour; • Has continuous flow with no restriction on amount of water output per minute, maintaining maximum oxidation levels required to eradicate 99.9% of bacteria;
33 of 334

4e3
25-88833
6 3
9 1
• Does not require other components such as oxygen enhancements, filters, or cartridges to operate with desired sanitation capabilities; and • Has guaranteed replacement of malfunctioning equipment within 48 hours.

In addition to the environmental benefits, this aqueous ozone cleaning solution improves operational efficiency. Specifically, it reduces the time staff spends on unnecessary processes, creating more capacity without additional cost, freeing up resources for activities that require staff’s attention, while improving quality and customer satisfaction outcomes.

In October 2023, the City Council approved entering into an agreement with eClean Technologies, LLC (eClean) to expand the use of the aqueous ozone equipment by renting 31 wall units and two mobile pressure washers. Since then, staff has been renting the equipment from eClean. During last year’s budget planning process, this contract was proposed for elimination due to the ongoing rental expense of the units.

Since then, staff has communicated with the vendor to amend the original agreement, which would afford the City an option to purchase and own these units when the original contract term ends in January 2027. Staff believes this arrangement affords the community an improved customer experience and the City a long-term financial savings.

Accordingly, staff recommends that Council pass a motion approving an amendment to the original contract terms to allow for this purchase, and appropriate $101,400 in the current fiscal year to continue renting 31 wall units and 2 mobile pressure washers. The total cost to rent the equipment through January 2027 and exercise the purchase option is $163,850. Staff also recommends that Council authorize an ongoing maintenance agreement with eClean Technologies, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $12,000 per year, that covers maintenance, repair and replacement of malfunctioning units if and when the City exercises its option to purchase the equipment. These funds will be appropriated in future years as part of the budget planning process.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Using aqueous ozone equipment to sanitize restrooms and other amenities at City parks and park facilities is consistent with the City Council’s priority of finding sustainable methods to run City operations.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost to continue renting through January 2027 and eventually purchase the equipment is $163,850. Once purchased, the future years’ maintenance and warranty will cost $12,000/year. There is no funding appropriated for the rental or purchase of equipment in fiscal year 2025-26; thus, staff is requesting an appropriation of $101,400 from the General Fund undesignated fund balance as follows:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account To (Account String) Funding Source 34 of 334

4e4
25-88833
6 3
9 1
String)
$101,400 25300-1010-000-
0000-P0000
43110-1010-CSP-
3008-P5150
General Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Community
Services &
Parks
Park Maintenance

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 in that consists of the operation, repair, or maintenance of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of former use. Moreover, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, it is exempt from CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).)

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Council may direct staff to continue renting the equipment beyond the rental term that ends in January 2027, which will cost $101,400/year.

2. The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services & Parks Prepared by:

Chris Peplow, Park Services Administrator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Campaign Finance Disclosure Form
35 of 334

1 1
2 6
2 2
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that, with respect to the report of the Director of Community Services & Parks dated September 30, 2025, the City Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager or a designee to (1) amend the City’s contract with eClean Technologies, LLC (“eClean”), to include an option for the City to purchase 33 units of aqueous ozone (“O3”) equipment at the end of the 36-month rental term, for a new total contract amount not to exceed $307,500, (2) exercise the City’s purchase option, and (3) enter into a contract with eClean for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of O3 equipment purchased by the City in an amount not to exceed $12,000 annually.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
36 of 334

RESOLUTIONNO.

RESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE

MAKINGANAPPROPRIATION
BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE:

SECTION1:Thatthesumof$101,400isherebyappropriatedand/ortransferredfromthefollowing accountstothefollowingaccounts:

ACCOUNTSDESCRIPTIONFROMTO
25300-1010-000UndesignatedFundBalance,GeneralFund$101,400 43110-1010-CSP-3008-P5150ContractualServices,GeneralFund,$101,400 CommunityServiesandParks,Parks
Maintenance,ParksYardAdministration
ToappropriatefundingfortheeCleanTechnologies,LLCcontract.

SECTION2:TheDirectorofFinanceisauthorizedtomakesuchotherrevisions,individualappropriation line-items,changesinsummaries,fundtotals,grandtotals,andotherportionsofthebudgetdocumentas necessarytoreflectandimplementthechangesspecifiedinthisresolution.

SECTION3:TheCityClerkshallcertifytotheadoptionofthisResolution.

Adoptedthisdayof
________________,
2025.

Mayor
ATTEST:
_CITYOFGLENDALE
DATE09/23)2025
___________________________
tVAPPROVEDASTOFiNANCIAL
CityClerkPROVISIONFOR$101400
Th
DirectorofFinance

STATEOFCALIFORNIA)

COUNTYOFLOSANGELES)SS

CITYOFGLENDALE)
I,SuzieAbajian,CityClerkoftheCityofGlendale,doherebycertifythattheforegoingResolution No.wasadoptedbytheCounciloftheCityofGlendale,California,ataregularmeetingheldon the__________dayof
________________,
2025,andthatthesamewasadoptedbythefollowingvote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

CityClerk
37 of 334

Exhibit 1
38 of 334

39 of 334

4f
25-88815

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Assignment of the “Agreement for Business and Multi-Family Solid Waste Collection Services in Zone C” Contract R107072 between the City of Glendale and Waste Resource Technologies, Inc.

1. Resolution authorizing Assignment of the Agreement for Business and Multi-Family Solid Waste Collection Service in Zone C from Waste Resource Technologies, Inc. (Contract R107072) to Waste Management of California, Inc. (WM)

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On July 27, 2021, the City Council authorized the establishment of four zones, granting exclusive solid waste franchises for solid waste collection services for commercial establishments and multi-family residential establishments of five units or greater. Council also awarded a franchise agreement for Zone C to Waste Resources Technologies, Inc. (WRT) (Contract R107072). On July 9, 2025, the city received a letter, from WRT, notifying staff of a company ownership change. Specifically, WRT entered into an agreement to sell its business assets to Waste Management (WM). Council authorization is needed to accommodate the requested consent to assignment.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Resolution authorizing assignment of the Agreement for Business and Multi- Family Solid Waste Collection Service in Zone C Between the City of Glendale and WRT assigning the agreement to WM.

ANALYSIS
The franchise agreement between WRT and the city was formally executed on August 27, 2021. The Agreement was one of four agreements signed with private waste haulers to provide collection service to commercial accounts as part of the city’s exclusive franchise collection program.

The city received a letter on July 9, 2025, from WRT notifying staff of a company ownership change. This notification was accompanied by an introductory letter and 40 of 334

4f2
25-88815
6 3
7 8
information supporting the assignment from WM.

Paragraph 18 of the Agreement provides, in relevant part:

The right granted by this Agreement shall not be transferred, sold, hypothecated, sublet or assigned (collectively “transferred”), nor shall any of the rights or privileges in this Agreement be hypothecated, lease, assigned, sold or transferred, wither whole or in part, nor shall title thereto, either legal or equitable, or any right, interest or property therein, pass to or vest in any person, either by act of Contractor or by operation of law, without the prior consent of the City expressed by resolution. Any attempt to do any of the foregoing with respect to any of the rights in this Agreement without the consent of the City shall be void. For purposes of this Agreement, any dissolution, merger, consolidation, change in control or other reorganization of Contractor shall be deemed an assignment of this Agreement.

The decision to consent to any assignment shall be in the sole discretion of the City Manager, as approved by Resolution adopted by the City’s City Council.

Any application for a transfer of rights shall be in a manner prescribed by the City Manager. The application shall include a transfer fee in an amount equal to fifty thousand dollars (50,000.00). The transfer fee shall be paid by Contractor or Contractor’s assignee upon any such transfer of this Agreement. If City does not receive the transfer fee within thirty (30) days of the transfer date, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement.

The July 9, 2025 letter requesting consent to assignment was reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. Following receipt of the request, Public Works staff initiated its due diligence to evaluate WM’s qualifications and ability to perform under the contract. WM provided a detailed description of the company’s corporate capability and qualifications in the Assignment Supporting Information report that was submitted to the city and accompanied the original WRT request for assignment letter. The report showed financial performance, experience, local network, regulatory compliance and adherence to best practices needed to successfully operate in Glendale.

Staff has found that WM is the largest United States waste disposal company by revenue according to Waste360. WM currently operates exclusive franchises in the cities of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Lancaster and County of Los Angeles County, as well as numerous other areas in Southern California showing that they are well established in this region.

Waste Management of California, Inc. is a corporation in good standing according to the California Secretary of State that is incorporated in California, with their corporate headquarters are in Texas. WM maintains multiple permitted solid waste facilities in the state, and they are experienced with CalRecycle reporting requirements. Staff believes WM has demonstrated the experience and corporate capacity to take over one of Glendale commercial franchise hauler zones.
41 of 334

4f3
25-88815
6 3
7 8
Staff met with representatives from WRT and WM on August 26, 2025, to discuss the proposed reassignment to ensure that the transition between the two companies would occur seamlessly and that affected Glendale businesses and residents would be well informed along every step of the process.

Staff asked WM to provide a formal Transition Plan to the city that describes the steps and process of the transition from one company to the other, and that includes assurances to the commercial customers in Zone C that the transition will have no impacts to their rates nor to the services they are provided, which will remain consistent with the provisions of the existing franchise agreement. Staff has reviewed and is satisfied with the content of the Transition Plan and that services will proceed without operational impacts to multi-family and commercial customers within Franchise Zone C.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
WRT and WM will be responsible for all the primary outreach and education to Zone C customers related to this transition. Glendale will provide updates on the progress of the transition on the city’s website and social media.

FISCAL IMPACT
The transfer fee set forth in the franchise agreement entitles the City of Glendale to a payment in the amount of $50,000, which will be revenues deposited into the Refuse Disposal Fund (5300).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is exempt from CEQA requirements because assigning a commercial waste franchise hauler agreement from one private hauling company to another will result in the same level of waste management services currently being provided and there is no environmental impact.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the Applicant seeking an entitlement and disclosure of any campaign contributions in the preceding 12 months to City of Glendale elected officials are attached as Exhibit 1 in accordance with City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. The City Council may elect not to approve the resolution and not authorize the assignment. The city expects WRT to continue meeting the terms of the agreement if the resolution is not approved.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
42 of 334

4f4
25-88815
6 3
7 8
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Daniel Hardgrove, Assistant Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Disclosure – Campaign Finance Ordinance – Applicants Seeking Entitlement 43 of 334

1 5
3 8
7 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGEMENT, OR A DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN

ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT FOR BUSINESS AND MULTI-FAMILY SOLID

WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE IN ZONE C BETWEEN THE CITY OF GLENDALE AND WASTE RESOURCES TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (CONTRACT R107072) ASSIGNING THE AGREEMENT TO WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

WHEREAS, Section 8.56.170 of the Glendale Municipal Code, authorizes exclusive collection for solid waste collection services for business and multi-family properties through an exclusive franchise agreement authorizing and obligating the holder to provide collection services within a franchise zone. by resolution of the Council of the City of Glendale; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 2021, the City Council authorized the establishment of four zones, granting exclusive commercial solid waste franchise for solid waste collection services and awarded a franchise agreement, Contract R107072, for Zone C to Waste Resources Technologies, Inc., (WRT); and
WHEREAS, the City and WRT executed Contract R107072 on September 1, 2021 and WRT has been performing the commercial collection services in Zone C; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2025, WRT submitted a written request to the City Manager for consent to assignment of the franchise agreement from Waste Resources Technologies, Inc. to Waste Management of California, Inc.; and WHEREAS, any assignment of the franchise agreement would be subject to the assignment provision in Section 18 of the Agreement, which provides, in relevant part:

The decision to consent to any assignment shall be in the sole discretion of the City Manager, as approved by Resolution adopted by the City’s City Council.
44 of 334

1 5
3 8
7 Any application for a transfer of rights shall be in a manner prescribed by the City Manager. The application shall include a transfer fee in an amount equal to fifty thousand dollars (50,000.00). The transfer fee shall be paid by Contractor or Contractor’s assignee upon any such transfer of this Agreement. If City does not receive the transfer fee within thirty (30) days of the transfer date, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement.

WHEREAS, following receipt of the request for assignment, City staff initiated its due diligence to evaluate WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,’s qualifications and ability to perform under the contract; and WHEREAS, Waste Management of California, Inc., is the largest United States waste disposal company by revenue according to Waste360 and currently operates exclusive franchises in the cities of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Lancaster and County of Los Angeles County, as well as numerous other areas in Southern California, showing that they are well established in this region; and
WHEREAS, Waste Management of California, Inc., is a corporation in good standing according to the California Secretary of State that is incorporated in California, with their corporate headquarters are in Texas; and
WHEREAS, Waste Management of California, Inc., maintains multiple permitted solid waste facilities in the state, and they are experienced with CalRecycle reporting requirements.

WHEREAS, Staff met with representatives from WRT and Waste Management of California, Inc., to discuss the proposed reassignment to ensure that the transition between the two companies would occur seamlessly and that affected Glendale businesses and residents would be well informed along every step of the process; and WHEREAS, Waste Management of California, Inc., submitted a formal Transition Plan to the city that describes the steps and process of the transition from one company to the other, and that includes assurances to the commercial customers in Zone C that the transition will have no impacts to their rates nor to the services they are provided, which will remain consistent with the provisions of the existing franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed and is satisfied with the content of the Transition Plan and that services will proceed without operational impacts to multi-family and commercial customers within Franchise Zone C; and
WHEREAS, Staff believes Waste Management of California, Inc., has demonstrated the experience and corporate capacity operate one of Glendale commercial franchise hauler zones; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Manager recommends consent to assignment of Contract R107072 from Waste Resources Technologies, Inc., to Waste Management of California, Inc.
45 of 334

1 5
3 8
7 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1. Consent to the assignment of the Agreement for Business And Multi- Family Solid Waste Collection Service In Zone C Between The City Of Glendale And Waste Resources Technologies, Inc. from Waste Resources Technologies, Inc. to Waste Management of California, Inc., subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

SECTION 2. The transfer fee of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). shall be paid by Waste Management of California, Inc.

SECTION 3: This Resolution shall have no force or effect unless and until a) the transfer fee in an amount equal to fifty thousand dollars, $50,000.00 is paid and received by the City of Glendale and Waste Management of California, Inc.

Adopted this day of 2025.

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, PhD, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2025, the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
46 of 334

Page 1 of 2 ends

\\Planningsrvr\planningshare\Current Planning\Co
unterForms\Campaign Finance forms\Campaign Finance SummaryRevised.doc

In August 2011, the Glendale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, which beco mes
effective on September 9, 2011 (“Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits campaign contributions from “applicants seeking entitlement,” certain of their contractors and subcontractors (including their architects, engineers, and design professionals) while the application is “pending” and for 12 months thereafter. An application is deemed pending when: an application or letter is filed and the City Council, Redevelopment Agency, or Housing Authority has original jurisdiction over approval of the entitlement, or when the application is formally appealed to the City Council.

The Ordinance also prohibits any member of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency, or Housing Authority from voting on any matter pertaining to an entitlement if that member has received a campaign contribution from the applicant seeking the entitlement, or certain contractors or subcontractors of the applicant, within the 12-month period preceding the consideration of the matter.

I. What acts does the Ordinance prohibit?
With respect to an “applicant seeking entitlement” before the Glendale City Council (“Council”), the Glendale Redevelopment Agency (“GRA”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”), the Ordinance does the following:

1. Prohibition No. 1 – Ban on contributions while application is pending and for 12 months thereafter. The Ordinance prohibits (a) an “applicant seeking entitlement”, (b) a “contractor of an applicant seeking an entitlement,” or (c) a “subcontractor of an applicant seeking an entitlement” from making a contribution to a member of City Council while an application is “pending” before the Council, GRA, or HA and for a period of 12 months after the last and final approval of the Council, GRA or HA.

2. Prohibition No. 2 – Ban on voting if contribution received during 12-month period preceding consideration of the matter. Prohibits any Council Member, Redevelopment Agency Member, or Housing Authority Member who has received a contribution from an applicant seeking entitlement, a contractor of an applicant seeking entitlement, or a subcontractor seeking entitlement within a period of 12 months prior to consideration of an entitlement from voting on the matter.

II. Who is an applicant seeking entitlement?
x Person who files an app lication or letter with the City, GRA, or HA, or x Person who is an owner or lessee of
property on whose behalf an application or letter is
filed
City of Glendale
Information Sheet- Campaign Finance Ordinance
Applicants Seeking Entitlement
Submit to Permit Services Center, 633 E. Broadway
, Rm. 101. For more
information call 818-548-3200.
47 of 334

Page 2 of 2 ends

\\Planningsrvr\planningshare\Current Planning\CounterForms\Campaign Finance forms\Campaign Finance SummaryRevised.doc

III. What is an entitlement?

An entitlement is any land use or similar entitlement including:

Permit License Conditional Use
Permit
Variance Architectural/Design
Review (any stage)
Franchise Administrative
Exception
Parking
Reduction
Permit
Review of Plans Development
Agreement
Disposition and
Development
Agreement
Exclusive
Negotiation
Agreement
Owner
Participation
Agreement
Affordable
Housing
Agreement
Financial
Assistance to a
Project

IV. When is an entitlement “pending?”

x For items that require approval of the Council, Redevelopment Agency or Housing Authority and thus must be set for review or hearing before that body, the application is deemed “pending” at the time the application or letter is filed. x For items where the Council, GRA, or HA is the appellate body, the application is “pending” when the notice of appeal has been filed.
x The three examples set forth below are intended to provide interpretive guidance:

(1) An application for a zone change is filed. Since a zone change can only be effectuated by the City Council, upon filing the application it would be pending before the City Council. (2) An application for a Conditional Use Permit is filed. Only at such time as the grant or denial of a Conditional Use Permit is appealed to the Council would it be pending before the City Council;
(3) An application for a variance in the Downtown Specific Plan (“DSP”) Area is filed. Since the Council has original jurisdiction over variances in the DSP, the variance application would be pending before the Council when filed.

V. Which contractors and subcontractors does the Ordinance apply to?

x Contractor of applicant seeking entitlement – A person who has, or has been promised, a contract as an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contractor with an applicant seeking entitlement.

x Subcontractor of applicant seeking entitlement – A person who has, or has been promised, a subcontract as an architect
, design professional, engineer, or perform
other work with a contractor of applicant seeking entitlement.

x For the contractors of applicant seeking entitlement and the subcontractors of applicant seeking entitlement, the prohibitions on campaign contributions and voting on matters related to contributors applies not only to the entity that is the contractor or subcontractor but also to the following individuals or entities of the contractor or subcontactors: CEO/President, Chairperson, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer, any member of the Board of Directors, and any individual or entity that owns 10% or more the contractor or subcontractor of applicant seeking entitlement, as well as any campaign committee that is sponsored and controlled by the contractor or subcontractor.
48 of 334

Page 1 of 3 ends

City of Glendale, Community Development Department (9/9/11) (To be Completed Prior to Preparation of Staff Reports for Consideration of Entitlement Matter by Council, Agency, or Authority, or at Time of Appeal to the City Council if the Applicant is also the Appellant) In August 2011, the Glendale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, which becomes effective on September 9, 2011 (“Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits campaign contributions from “applicants seeking entitlement,” their contractors and subcontractors (including their architects, engineers, and design professionals) while the application is “pending” and for 12 months thereafter. The Ordinance also prohibits Council Members from voting on any matter pertaining to an entitlement if the Council member has received a campaign contribution from the applicant seeking the entitlement, or certain contractors or subcontractors of the applicant, within the 12-month period preceding the vote.

The Applicant and the Owner/Lessor hereby discloses as follows. (If printing, please print legibly. Use additional sheets as necessary.) I. Name of Applicant and Name of Owner/Lessor on whose behalf application is filed:

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip

City of Glendale
Disclosure - Campaign Finance Ordinance
Applicants Seeking Entitlement
Submit to Permit Services Center, 633 E. Broadway, Rm. 101.

For more information, call 818-548-3200.

Waste Management of California, Inc.

Sun Valley
CA
91352
9081 Tujunga Avenue
49 of 334

Page 2 of 3 ends

City of Glendale, Community Development Department (9/9/11) II. Officers or owners/investors of Applicant Entity. Please also disclose the following persons or entities related to the applicant entity: CEO/President, Chairperson, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer, any member of the Board of Directors, a nd any individual or entity that owns 10% or more the contractor of applicant seeking entitlement, as well as any campaign + Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip

III. Contractor of Applicant(s) Seeking Entitlement*
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip

* “Contractor of Applicant Seeking Entitlement” means “a person who has, or has been promised, a contract as an architect, design professional, engineer, or general or prime contract with an applicant seeking entitlement. “Contractor of applicant seeking entitlement,” includes not only the contracting party but also the CEO/President, Chairperson, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer, any member of the Board of Directors, and any individual or entity that owns 10% or more the contractor of applicant seeking entitlement, as well as any campaign committee that is sponsored and controlled by the contracting party.

Please list the names and addresses of all of these parties.

IV. Subcontractor of Applicant(s) Seeking Entitlement** Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip

** “Subcontractor of Applicant Seeking Entitlement” means “a person who has, or has been promised, a subcontract as an architect, design professional, engineer, or perform other work with a ‘contractor an applicant seeking entitlement.” Sun Valley
CA
9081 Tujunga Avenue
91352
See attached list.
50 of 334

Page 3 of 3 ends

City of Glendale, Community Development Department (9/9/11) “Subcontractor of applicant seeking entitlement,” includes not only the subcontracting party, but also the CEO/President, Chairperson, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer, any member of the Board of Directors, and any individual or entity that owns 10% or more the subcontractor of applicant seeking entitlement, as well as any campaign committee that is sponsored and controlled by the subcontracting party. Please list the name and addresses of all of these parties.

V. Disclosure. The Applicant Seeking Entitlement has made campaign or officeholder contributions in the preceding 12 months to City of Glendale elected officials as follows:

Elected Official Name of Individual or Entity Date of Contribution

I hereby certify, on behalf of the above-named applicant(s) and owner(s)/lessor(s), that the applicant seeking entitlement has made the campaign contributions as set forth above. I also certify that the names of all contractors of applicant and all subcontractors of applicant, as of today’s date, are fully set forth above. I further acknowledge that the applicant has a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if the applicant selects additional or substitute architects, design professionals, contractors or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change. I hereby certify that I have been legally authorized by the applicant/owner/lessor to submit this disclosure form and certify to the content hereof.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on ___________________ at _____________________________, California Applicant’s Signature_____________________________, Print Applicant’s Full Name ___________________________________ Applicant’s Address _____________________________________________________________________ Applicant’s Contact Phone Number ________________________________________________________ Applicant’s Email Address _______________________________________________________________ [email protected]
(661) 382-7436
Joshua Mann
Sun Valley
9081 Tujunga Avenue, Sun Valley, CA 91352
September 3, 2025
51 of 334

Report Name : Management Structure
Exported On : 9/3/2025
Entity Name: Waste Management of California, Inc.

Name Title Title Role
Hammer, Michael S. Director Director
Oseguera, Alejandro Director Director
Tippy, Courtney A. Director Director
Hammer, Michael S. President - Southern California Area Officer Oseguera, Alejandro President - Northern California Area Officer Beytelman, Vladimir Vice President and Assistant Secretary Officer Carroll, John A. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
Officer
Cassin, Joseph J. Vice President Officer
Grady, Jr. Mark P. Vice President Officer
Lockett, Mark A. Vice President and Assistant Treasurer Officer Nagy, Leslie K. Vice President and Treasurer Officer
Stratton, David J. H. Vice President and Assistant Secretary Officer Tippy, Courtney A. Vice President and Secretary Officer Wilson, James A. Vice President Officer
Bennett, Jeff R. Assistant Treasurer Officer
Bohn, Jason C. Assistant Secretary Officer
Khajetoorians, Asteghik Assistant Secretary Officer
Exhibit 1 Cont.
52 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Request for Conflict of Interest Waiver in Legal Representation by Holland & Hart LLP

1.Motion Authorizing the City Attorney to Consent to the Southern California Public Power Authority’s (SCPPA) Execution of a Conflict of Interest Waiver for Holland & Hart LLP for an unrelated matter and for future SCPPA conflict waivers for unrelated matters.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for September 23, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report requests City Council’s authorization for a waiver of legal conflict of interest by the Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA). The waiver would permit SCPPA’s outside counsel, Holland & Hart LLP (H&H) to represent a SCPPA counterparty, Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC (Longroad) in an unrelated matter. H&H requires the waiver from SCPPA because H&H is representing SCPPA in a matter involving contract negotiations adverse to Longroad as the other party. SCPPA is seeking Glendale’s concurrence and consent to waive the conflict of interest because Glendale, a member of SCPPA, is a potential participant in the SCPPA Transaction in which H&H is representing SCPPA adverse to Longroad.

RECOMMENDATION
That Council authorize the City Attorney to consent to SCPPA’s waiver of the conflict described herein. Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council grant authorization to the City Attorney to consent to future SCPPA conflict waivers provided they are for matters unrelated to Holland & Hart’s representation of Glendale.

ANALYSIS
Glendale is a member of SCPPA which is a Joint Powers Authority comprised of eleven cities and one irrigation district, focused on electrical generation and transmission issues. 53 of 334

24g
6 3
5 4
H&H has in the past and is currently representing SCPPA in contract negotiations on a matter adverse to Longroad (the SCPPA Transaction). H&H also currently represents Longroad in separate, unrelated matters that are unrelated to the SCPPA Transaction, under previous conflict waivers granted by SCPPA and Longroad in 2019, 2023 and January 2025. SCPPA’s 2019, 2023 and 2025 conflict waivers do not apply to future or undisclosed conflicts.

H&H seeks SCPPA’s waiver of conflicts, as well as Longroad’s waiver of conflict, to permit H&H to represent SCPPA in the SCPPA Transaction. Because Glendale is participating in the negotiations for the SCPPA Transaction, SCPPA Bylaws require that SCPPA seek Glendale’s concurrence for the new conflict waiver.

The new matter in which H&H represents Longroad is unrelated to the SCPPA Transaction. None of the attorneys representing SCPPA would work on the separate matter for Longroad, and none of the attorneys representing Longroad would work on the SCPPA Transaction. H&H will maintain an ethical wall in place. The conflict waiver would not apply to any future, undisclosed conflicts.

For the reasons above, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Attorney, or his designee, to consent to a waiver of conflict described herein on behalf of Glendale. It is also recommended that the City Council grant authority to the City Attorney to consent to future SCPPA conflict waivers as the need arises for future projects, provided they are for matters unrelated to Holland & Hart’s representation of Glendale.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the concurrence with and the execution of the conflict waiver described herein.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action requested herein has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and as such is not a project subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15378

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Not authorize the Conflict of Interest Waiver as requested herein.

2. Council’s consideration of any other alternatives not proposed by staff. 54 of 334

34g
6 3
5 4

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Prepared by:

Dorine Martirosian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
55 of 334

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________________, that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Attorney to consent to Southern California Public Power Authority’s (SCPPA) execution of a Waiver of Conflict of Interest to permit SCPPA’s outside counsel, Holland & Hart LLP to represent a SCPPA counterparty, Longroad Energy Holdings, LLC in an unrelated matter, as described in the Report Dated September 16, 2025 by the City Attorney. The City Council further authorizes the City Attorney to consent to future SCPPA conflict waivers for unrelated matters.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
56 of 334

ORDINANCE NO. ____________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 2.38.090 and 2.38.140 OF
THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, PERTAINING TO THE

FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS AND POWERS AND DUTIES

OF THE COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1. Section 2.38.090 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:
§ 2.38.090 Meetings.

A. The commission shall meet at least once a month such time and place as the commission may fix by resolution, consistent with the dates and times available for televising the meetings.

B. Special meetings of the commission may be called at any time by the chairperson, or three voting members thereof by written notice served upon each member as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act.

C. All meetings of the commission shall be open to the public and held in compliance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act. The commission on the status of women shall keep a record of minutes of all its proceedings and actions which shall be available for public inspection.

SECTION 2. Section 2.38.140 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:
§ 2.38.140 Powers and duties—Generally.

The powers and duties of the commission on the status of women shall be to:

1. Assess and evaluate the needs and issues of women and girls in the city in order to inform and advise the city council, city departments and divisions, city boards and commissions, and other community agencies and organizations of those needs and issues;

2. Recommend legislation to the city council and/or organize programs to promote and ensure equal rights and opportunities to and for women and girls in the city drawing on information from, including but not limited to, reports on the Status of Women and Girls; the City’s Workforce Demographics Report; and any other issue the commission deems relevant regarding, structures, practices, processes and programs within City Hall and in the community impacting women and girls;

3. Promote education on issues involving the needs of women and girls; prepare and disseminate such information; and provide outreach information and education that empowers women and girls to achieve self-sufficiency and self-esteem;

4. Consult, engage and maintain an active liaison with groups, organizations, agencies, other commissions, public bodies and individuals in regard to issues related to women;

5. Explore and engage in fundraising activities;

6. Work in conjunction with city departments regarding the development, implementation, and evaluation of programs a impacting women and girls, including receiving and providing input, reviewing programs from departments, and participating in working groups;
57 of 334

7. Submit an annual report and other reports to the city council as appropriate; and

8. Perform other duties as may be imposed upon the commission by the city council by ordinance or resolution.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of , 2025. _________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ______ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _______________, 2025, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

______________________________
City Clerk
58 of 334

8a
25-87656

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Ordinance Amending Glendale Municipal Code provisions regarding meetings, powers and duties of the Commission on the Status of Women

1. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Sections 2.38.090 and 2.38.140 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 – Relating to the Commission on the Status of Women.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for September 9, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During its March 18, 2025, Council recommended certain changes to the frequency of meetings of the Commission on the Status of Women and their powers and duties. This report provides those amendments by changing the frequency of meetings from quarterly to monthly. It further amends the provisions pertaining to the Commission’s powers and responsibilities, to include regular programming based on policy recommendations of the Commission’s Report on the Status of Women and Girls and the City’s Workforce Demographics Report, engaging in community partnerships and fundraising.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends introduction and adoption of the Ordinance as directed by Council.

ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND
The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) was originally established in 2003 to serve as an advisory body to the City Council, providing recommendations on policies, programs, and services that address the needs of women in Glendale.

Per Glendale Municipal Code (“GMC”) Section 2.38.140, the powers and duties of the Commission were established as follows:
"The powers and duties of the Commission on the Status of Women shall 59 of 334

8a2
25-87656
5 9
1 7
be to assess and evaluate the needs and issues of women in the City in order to inform and advise the City Council, City departments and divisions, and other community agencies and organizations of those needs and issues; recommend programs or legislation to the City Council to promote and ensure equal rights and opportunities to and for women in the City; to promote education on issues regarding matters involving the needs of women and to prepare and disseminate such information; provide outreach information and education that empowers women to achieve self-sufficiency and self-esteem; maintain an active liaison with groups, organizations, agencies and individuals in regard to issues related to women; perform other duties as may be imposed upon the Commission by the City Council by ordinance or resolution."
Since its inception, the CSW has undergone multiple modifications, including changes to its composition, meeting frequency, and overall function. The Council has directed the restoration of CSW’s programmatic function and an increase in the frequency of its regular meetings. To that end, the City Attorney has prepared a draft ordinance for the Council’s consideration. The draft Ordinance increases the regular meeting schedule from quarterly to monthly, and modifies the CSW’s powers and duties, as follows:

The powers and duties of the commission on the status of women shall be to assess and evaluate the needs and issues of women in the city in order to inform and advise the city council, city departments and divisions, and other community agencies and organizations of those needs and issues; recommend legislation to the city council and/or organize programs or legislation to the city council to promote and ensure equal rights and opportunities to and for women in the city based on the Report on the Status of Women and Girls prepared from time to time at the behest of the commission and the City’s Workforce Demographics Report; to promote education on issues regarding matters involving the needs of women and to prepare and disseminate such information; provide outreach information and education that empowers women to achieve self-sufficiency and self-esteem; engage and maintain an active liaison with groups, organizations, agencies and individuals in regard to issues related to women; explore and engage in fundraising activities; perform other duties as may be imposed upon the commission by the city council by ordinance or resolution.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adoption of the proposed ordinance.

The existing position headcount will be transferred from the City Clerk’s departmental budget to the City Manager’s Office within the General Fund in order to accommodate 60 of 334

8a3
25-87656
5 9
1 7
the increased meeting frequency and additional programmatic functions for the CSW.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The ordinance implementing changes to the CSW is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines"). The proposed ordinance is not a “project” for CEQA purposes as it involves only organizational and administrative activities of government. CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378(b)(5). It is further exempt since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. The Council could choose not to introduce or adopt the Ordinance.

2. City Council may elect to consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Prepared by:

Lucy Varpetian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Councilmember Asatryan’s comments on the proposed Ordinance submitted on August 26, 2025
61 of 334

ORDINANCE NO. ____________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 2.38.090 and 2.38.140 OF
THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, PERTAINING TO THE

FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS AND POWERS AND DUTIES

OF THE COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1. Section 2.38.090 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:
§ 2.38.090 Meetings.

A. The commission shall meet at least once quarterly a month at such time and place as the commission may fix by resolution, consistent with the dates and times available for televising the meetings.

B. Special meetings of the commission may be called at any time by the chairperson, or three voting members thereof by written notice served upon each member as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act.

SECTION 2. Section 2.38.140 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:
§ 2.38.140 Powers and duties—Generally.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of , 2025. _________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

______________________________
City Clerk
63 of 334

ORDINANCE NO. ____________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 2.38.090 and 2.38.140 OF
THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, PERTAINING TO THE

FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS AND POWERS AND DUTIES

OF THE COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1. Section 2.38.090 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:

§ 2.38.090 Meetings.

A. The commission shall meet at least once quarterly a month at such time and place as the commission may fix by resolution, consistent with the dates and times available for televising the meetings.

B. Special meetings of the commission may be called at any time by the chairperson, or three voting members thereof by written notice served upon each member as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act.

SECTION 2. Section 2.38.140 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995, is amended to read as follows:

§ 2.38.140 Powers and duties—Generally.

The powers and duties of the commission on the status of women shall be to:

1. A assess and evaluate the needs and issues of women and girls in the city in order to inform and advise the city council, city departments and divisions, city boards and commissions, and other community agencies and organizations of those needs and issues;

2. Recommend legislation to the city council and/or organize programs or legislation to the city council to promote and ensure equal rights and opportunities to and for women and girls in the city drawing on information from, including but not limited to, based on the rReports on the Status of Women and Girls; prepared from time to time at the behest of the commission and the City’s Workforce Demographics Report; and any other issue the commission deems relevant regarding, structures, practices, processes and programs within City Hall and in the community impacting women and girls;

3. Ppromote education on issues regarding matters involving the needs of women and girls; and to prepare and disseminate such information; and provide outreach information and education that empowers women and girls to achieve self-sufficiency and self- esteem;

4. Consult, engage and maintain an active liaison with groups, organizations, agencies, other commissions, public bodies and individuals in regard to issues related to women;

5. E explore and engage in fundraising activities;
64 of 334

7. Submit an annual report and other reports to the city council as appropriate;

8. Pperform other duties as may be imposed upon the commission by the city council by ordinance or resolution.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of , 2025.

_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ______ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _______________, 2025, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
65 of 334

______________________________
City Clerk

66 of 334

From: Abajian, Suzie
To: Golanian, Roubik
Cc: Garcia, Michael J.; Simon, Jinette; Adjemian, Aram
Subject: Fwd: Support for Agenda Item 9A – Commission on the Status of Women Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 12:30:22 PM
Attachments: glendaleca_logo.png
Get Outlook for iOS
Suzie Abajian | City Clerk
City Clerk
613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206
P: +1 (818) 548-2090
[email protected] |
GlendaleCA.gov | Follow us!
From: Nina Crowe <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 11:07:58 PM
To: Najarian, Ara <[email protected]>; Gharpetian, Vartan <[email protected]>; Asatryan, Elen <[email protected]>; Ardashes Kassakhian <[email protected]>; Brotman, Daniel <[email protected]> Cc: Abajian, Suzie <[email protected]>
Subject: Support for Agenda Item 9A – Commission on the Status of Women

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Dear Mayor Najarian and Glendale City Councilmembers,
I am writing to express my strong support for Agenda Item 9A and to respectfully urge your adoption of Alternative 2, as outlined in the Exhibits and Attachments submitted by Councilmember Elen Asatryan on August 26, 2025.

As Chief Executive Officer of Glendale Arts, I witness the importance of civic leadership, representation, and responsive governance every day. The Commission on the Status of Women plays a critical role in advancing gender equity and improving the quality of life for women and girls in Glendale. To fulfill this responsibility meaningfully, the Commission must be equipped with the structure, cadence, and resources afforded to other City commissions.

At present, the Commission meets only four times a year, less frequently than other City bodies tasked with addressing such urgent and complex issues, including gender-based violence, economic opportunity, healthcare access, and pathways to community leadership. A monthly meeting schedule is not only reasonable, it is essential.
67 of 334

Alternative 2 reflects the Council’s previous guidance and enhances the Commission’s ability to function effectively. It provides clear language, aligns the Commission’s structure with other City commissions, and ensures access to essential data across departments from Homeless Services to Domestic Violence Response, Economic Development, and trusted community partners such as YWCA Glendale and Door of Hope.

This is the time to build a stronger Commission. One that is empowered to advocate, collaborate, and act on behalf of half of our city’s population.

I respectfully urge you to:

Adopt Alternative 2 as submitted in the August 26 Exhibits and Attachments; and
Reaffirm and allocate a full-time staff position to support the Commission’s success.

Let’s provide the Commission on the Status of Women with the foundation it needs to thrive and the tools it needs to lead.

Thank you for your time, your leadership, and your continued commitment to equity and inclusion.

Sincerely,
Nina Crowe, Chief executive Officer
Glendale Arts
office: 818-243-2611 ext. 1
mobile: 818-605-8630
Your support fuels the transformative power of the arts. Donate today!! Glendale Arts
GlendaleArts.org
>> @GlendaleArtsCA
Glendale International Film Festival
GlendaleIFF.org
>> @GlendaleIFF
ace/121 Gallery
ace121gallery.com
>> @ace121Gallery
68 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Introduction of Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 6025 Establishing the Electric Rates for Glendale Water & Power for Fiscal Years 2024 to 2028 to Implement Adjusted and Redistributed Electric Rates Increases effective November 1, 2025, November 1, 2026 and November 1, 2027.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for September 30, 2025 Calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Council adopted the last electric rate increase for ratepayers in November 2023. The rates were based on a COSA covering a five-year period from fiscal year 2024 through fiscal year 2028. The Council approved a three-year rate increase averaging 14.8% effective January 1, 2024; 11.3% effective July 1, 2024; and 11.3% effective July 1, 2025, with no rate increases in the final two years. Understanding the impact that the rates implemented to date had on customers’ utility bills, GWP staff made every effort to mitigate the impact of the final scheduled adjustment. After a careful analysis of cash balances, reserves, and projected revenues from non-rate sources, GWP staff recommended deferring the July 1, 2025 11.3% rate increase to November 1, 2025, and redistributing the increase as follows: 5% effective November 1, 2025; 2.95% effective November 1, 2026; and 2.95% effective November 1, 2027.

On June 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-80 whereby it approved GWP’s deferral and redistribution plan. This approach shifts the adjustment implementation to occur after the peak customer usage season, reducing impacts on customer bills. It also enables the Utility to recover the revenue necessary to support operations and capital projects within the COSA timeframe. Due to time constraints, only the general system average rates were presented at that time. Therefore, GWP staff is now returning to Council with the proposed rate changes by customer class, following coordination with the COSA consultant, NewGen Strategies. 69 of 334

29d
3 6
9 5
The proposed ordinance will be presented for introduction on September 30, 2025 with anticipated adoption on October 7, 2025, which will make the effective date November 6, 2025. Because the ordinance will reduce and redistribute the rates that would otherwise go into effect on November 1, 2025, the proposed ordinance includes a provision to apply the redistribution retroactively to November 1, 2025 consistent with City Council’s direction.

RECOMMENDATION
Introduce an ordinance for the proposed redistribution of the planned 11.3% average rate adjustment - originally scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2025 - to November 1, 2025; November 1, 2026; and November 1, 2027, using the new customer class rates proposed by the City’s COSA consultant. The deferral, which was approved by Council on June 3, 2025, is intended to provide relief to ratepayers during the peak summer months, when energy usage and customer bills are typically at their highest. By spreading the adjusted increases over three years, the proposed redistribution reduces the financial impact on customers by avoiding a single, large rate increase. With the deferral and redistribution using the proposed customer class rates, total revenue received and projected will remain sufficient to support the utility’s financial obligations, including debt service payments, compliance with debt coverage ratio requirements, and maintaining an adequate number of days cash on hand.

Since these rates were originally adopted by ordinance, this proposed modification also needs to be adopted by ordinance. Staff is recommending that future establishment of rates be adopted by a resolution for process efficiency.

ANALYSIS
GWP’s last electric rate increase for Glendale ratepayers was adopted by City Council on November 14, 2023. Council approved a three-year rate increase averaging 14.8%,

11.3%, and 11.3%, which took effect on January 1, 2024, and July 1, 2024, with the final increase originally scheduled for July 1, 2025, respectively. These rate increases were designed to support the Grayson Repowering Project and provide partial funding for the Scholl Canyon Biogas Renewable Generation Project, City solar initiatives, and Glendale’s efforts toward fleet and building electrification. They also help offset rising costs associated with wholesale power purchases, renewable energy development, and fuel. Many of the financial commitments for these capital projects were expected to or did occur during the first three years of the COSA period, and since bonds were issued to cover those costs, most of the rate increases also needed to occur during that time to comply with bond covenants.

The deferral and redistribution of the final average 11.3% rate increase is projected to reduce retail revenues by approximately $24.2 million in fiscal year 2026, $13.1 million in fiscal year 2027, and $3.9 million in fiscal year 2028- a total reduction of $41.2 million compared to the original revenue estimates in the 2023 Cost of Service Analysis.
70 of 334

39d
3 6
9 5
The Electric Fund is able to absorb the impact of these revenue reductions for the following reasons:
Actual and projected revenues from sales to other agencies, interest income, and sales of carbon allowance credits are now expected to exceed original forecasts.
The actual expenses realized and projected for purchased power and natural gas are now anticipated to be lower than originally forecasted. Delay in Capital expenditures on projects resulted in higher-than-anticipated cash balances yielding higher interest revenue from invested funds.

On June 3, 2025, the City Council approved GWP’s recommendation to defer the July 1st increase and implement adjustments of the rate increases utilizing general system average rates for fiscal years 2025-2026, 2026-2027 and 2027-2028, with the understanding that GWP staff would return to Council with rate adjustments by customer class for formal adoption. NewGen Strategies, the city’s COSA consultant subsequently updated the COSA for fiscal years 2025-2026, 2026-2027, and 2027-2028 to determine the appropriate rate adjustments by customer rate class. The updated analysis confirms that the proposed deferral and redistribution of the 11.3% average rate adjustment remains in line with the City’s overall cost recovery obligations. The table below presents the results of the COSA analysis by customer rate class while meeting obligations set forth in Proposition 26 (see Exhibit A).

Rate Adjustments by Customer Rate Class
If the proposed ordinance is introduced at this meeting and is adopted on October 7, 2025, it will be effective on November 6, 2025. Because the proposed ordinance will reduce and redistribute the rates that would otherwise go into effect on November 1, 2025, the proposed ordinance includes a provision which makes the implementation of the proposed adjusted and redistributed rates retroactive to November 1, 2025.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A
R ate Class11/1/202511/1/202611/1/2027Cumulative
O verall S ystem5.00% 2.95% 2.95% 11.30%
R esidential6.10% 3.58% 3.58% 13.80%
S mall Business5.63% 3.27% 3.27% 12.70%
M edium Business3.29% 1.95% 1.95% 7.40%
Large Business4.23% 2.50% 2.50% 9.50%
71 of 334

49d
3 6
9 5

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed deferral and redistribution of the system average rates by customer class, as outlined in the report, is estimated to reduce revenues by approximately $41.2 million over the three-year period. However, this reduction in revenue can be absorbed within the existing COSA due to higher-than-forecasted non-rate revenues and savings in Purchased Power expenditures.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action requested herein is ministerial and thus not a project for the purposes of California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, CEQA does not apply.

ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Not introduce the Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 6025 establishing the Electric Rates for Glendale Water & Power for Fiscal Years 2024 to 2028 to Implement Adjusted and Redistributed Electric Rates Increases effective November 1, 2025, November 1, 2026 and November 1, 2027, in which case, rate adjustments will default to the originally adopted rate increases approved in November 2023 of 11.3% on average for Fiscal Year 25-26.

Alternative 2: Consider other alternatives not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Scott K. Mellon, P.E., General Manager - Glendale Water & Power Prepared by:

Adrine Isayan, Assistant General Manager - Finance & Risk Management David Davis, Utility Finance Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS / ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A: Rate Table
72 of 334

1 ORDINANCE NO. ______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6025 ESTABLISHING THE

ELECTRIC RATES FOR GLENDALE WATER & POWER FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024 TO 2028 TO IMPLEMENT ADJUSTED AND REDISTRIBUTED
ELECTRIC RATES INCREASES EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 2025,
NOVEMBER 1, 2026 AND NOVEMBER 1, 2027

WHEREAS, the City of Glendale, through the Glendale Water & Power Department (“GWP”), operates a municipal utility for the distribution of electrical energy to the residents of the City of Glendale; and

WHEREAS, on November 28, 2023 the Glendale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6016, implementing electric rates for Fiscal Years 2024 through 2028, which took effect on January 1, 2024; and

WHEREAS, on April 2, 2024, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6025 which updated the Standby Service Rates and Rider for standard Medium LD-2 and Large Business PC-1 including Time-of-Use (TOU) customers and proposing updates to provide needed benefits and cost savings to the customer through a monthly peak demand instead of a ratcheted 12 month peak demand and proposing extending the standby service rider to the Medium Business Dispatchable and Large Business Dispatchable TOU LD2B and PC1B rates; and

WHEREAS, on June 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-80, whereby it deferred the July 1, 2025 Electric Rate adjustment to November 1, 2025 and directed GWP to adjust and redistribute the 11.3% average adjustment scheduled to take into effect on July 1, 2025 as follows: 5% effective November 1, 2025; 2.95% effective November 1, 2026; and 2.95% effective November 1, 2027, and directed staff to return in advance of November 1, 2025 with an Ordinance with updated rates reflecting the authorized rate adjustment and redistribution; and

WHEREAS, staff, in the Report dated September 30, 2025 by the General Manager of GWP, has presented adjusted and redistributed electric rates for the remaining three years of the current Cost of Service Analysis (COSA) for implementation effective November 1, 2025, November 1, 2026 and November 1, 2027 as presented in the Rate Table attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the reports and testimony of staff and the comments of the public regarding the same; and

73 of 334

2 WHEREAS, the COSA and proposed rate plan reflect previously approved law and legislative direction of the present and former City Councils including: (i) the requirements of Article Xl, Section 22 of the Glendale City Charter, which was approved by the voters in 1949 and has remained in the City Charter since that date; and (ii) the Public Benefits Charge set forth in Section 13.44.425 of the Glendale Municipal Code, which was first approved in 1997 as required by state law and subsequently amended in 1998, 1999, 2001, 2006 and 2008 and has remained in the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (“GMC”) without change since 2008; and

WHEREAS, the proposed electric service rates and charges, as set forth in Ordinance 6025 and as amended by this Ordinance, have been calculated on the basis of the reasonable costs incurred by GWP to provide electric service to GWP’s customers; and

WHEREAS, the proposed electric service rates and charges constitute charges imposed for one or more of the following reasons: (1) a specific City benefit conferred or privilege granted (California Constitution, Article XIIIC, §1(e)(1)) and/or (2) a City service or product (California Constitution, Article XIIIC, §1 (e)(2)).

WHEREAS, the proposed Ordinance is being presented for introduction on September 30, 2025 with anticipated adoption on October 7, 2025, which will make the effective date November 6, 2025; and

WHEREAS, because the Ordinance will reduce and redistribute the rates that would otherwise go into effect on November 1, 2025, the proposed Ordinance shall apply the redistribution retroactively to November 1, 2025 in order for the proposed adjusted and redistributed electric rates for the remaining three years of the current COSA to be implemented effective November 1, 2025, November 1, 2026 and November 1, 2027 as presented in the Rate Table attached hereto as Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1. Notice of public meetings at which this Ordinance was considered was properly given, and all oral and written presentations made to and heard by the City Council were properly considered.

SECTION 2. There is a reasonable relationship between the rates to be charged for the provision of various City services and the City’s costs in providing those services.

74 of 334

3 SECTION 3. The adjustment and redistribution which amends the Electric Rates attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference:
a) D
o not exceed the actual or estimated reasonable costs to the City for providing the services to which the fees related; b) A
re reasonable and necessary to enable the City to provide the benefit or privilege, service or product to which they related; and c) H
ave been allocated in a manner such that the costs to the payor bear a fair and reasonable relationship to the payor’s burden on, or benefits received, from the City.

SECTION 4. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act.

The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15273, CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, and other charges by public agency which the public agency finds are for the purpose of (1) meeting operating expenses including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, (2) purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment or materials, (3) meeting financial reserve needs and requirements, (4) obtaining funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas, or (5) obtaining funds necessary to maintain such intra-city transfers are authorized by City Charter.

As set forth in the Report dated March 26, 2024 by the General Manager of GWP, the electric rate increases which were approved via Ordinance No. 6106 and those which are being recommended for approv al are for the express purposes of meeting existing operating expenses of GWP, purchasing supplies, equipment or materials necessary to operate the utility, funding certain c apital improvements necessary to supply electricity to the residents and businesses within Glendale’s service area, and to ensure the Glendale City Charter authorized intra-city transfer can be maintained.

SECTION 5. The City Council hereby adopts the amendments proposed herein and the electric rate schedule as set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 6. The City Council also directs that future electric rate implementations be authorized by City Council Resolution, unless otherwise required by applicable law.

SECTION 7. Severability. This Ordinance is adopted under the authority of the Charter of the city of Glendale and State law. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase is declared invalid or otherwise void by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any remaining provision hereof. In this regard the City Council finds and declares that it would have adopted this measure notwithstanding any partial invalidity hereof.
75 of 334

4 SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after the date of its passage.

SECTION 9. Retroactive Implementation of Redistribution and Application of Rate Schedule. The electric rate schedule as set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference shall be implemented and applied retroactively to November 1, 2025 for the remaining three years of the current COSA with implementation effective November 1, 2025, November 1, 2026 and November 1, 2027 as presented in the Rate Table attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Passed by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of _______________, 2025.

____________________________
Mayor

ATTEST:

_________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE )

I, Suzie Abajian Ph.D., City Clerk of the city of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___________ was passed by a majority vote of the Council of the city of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _____________, 2025, and that the same was passed by the followed vote.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

______________________________
City Clerk
76 of 334

EXHIBIT A
77 of 334

78 of 334

79 of 334

80 of 334

81 of 334

82 of 334

83 of 334

84 of 334

85 of 334

86 of 334

EXHIBIT A
87 of 334

88 of 334

89 of 334

90 of 334

91 of 334

92 of 334

93 of 334

94 of 334

95 of 334

96 of 334

Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
From: City Council
To: Simon, Jinette
Cc: Adjemian, Aram; Abajian, Suzie
Subject: FW: Public Comment re: 9/23/25 Agenda Item #4 (GWP Electric Rates) Date: Monday, September 22, 2025 5:26:35 PM

From: City Council
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2025 5:23 PM
To: Simon, Jinette <[email protected]>; Suzie Abajian <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Public Comment re: 9/23/25 Agenda Item #4 (GWP Electric Rates)

From: Grace Z. Vivas <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2025 9:53 AM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Comment re: 9/23/25 Agenda Item #4 (GWP Electric Rates)

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Good Morning Honorable Members,

I am a Glendale resident and homeowner, and I am writing to express my deep concern and frustration with the rapidly increasing electric rates and fees charged by Glendale Water and Power.

My most recent utility bill, covering 7/8/2025 to 9/6/2025, was over $1,000 for my small single family home. Of that, approximately $720 was the electricity portion, including a $45 customer charge. That fee alone amounts to $274 annually, simply to be connected to the system -- regardless of whether I use 1 kWh or 30 kWh per day. This is excessive and unreasonable.

Similarly, there is an additional $0.89 daily charge simply to be connected to the water line -- regardless of how much water is used.

Even more troubling are the High Season electricity rates of 0.2863, 0.3549, and 0.4238 per kWh from July through October. By comparison, Burbank Water and Power charges a $14.25 customer service fee and rates as low as 0.0294 for the first 300 kWh and 0.1071 for all additional kWh: https://www.burbankwaterandpower.com/electric/rates-and-charges .
97 of 334

Glendale residents are paying three to four times as much as our neighbors in Burbank for the same electricity. This is not only unfair, but it is unaffordable. It is disheartening that Glendale City Council has allowed such steep increases without sufficient consideration of the economic burden on residents.

I support Agenda Item #4 to adjust and redistribute the remaining electric rate increases through 2027. However, most of the harm has already occurred, with compounded increases of 14.8%, 11.3%, and 11.3% in just the last year and a half. Not only should these rate hikes be slowed, but they should be reversed
. Glendale families deserve relief.

Respectfully,
Grace Vivas, Esq.

Glendale Resident and Homeowner
98 of 334

Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important From: City Council
To: Simon, Jinette; Abajian, Suzie
Cc: Adjemian, Aram
Subject: FW: Public Comment Regarding Item #4 for Meeting on September 23, 2025 (GWP Electricity Rates) Date: Monday, September 22, 2025 5:19:34 PM

From: Dina Issagholi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2025 12:41 PM
To: City Council <[email protected]>
Subject: Public Comment Regarding Item #4 for Meeting on September 23, 2025 (GWP Electricity Rates)

CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Good morning,

My name is Dina Issagholi and I have been a resident in Glendale for nearly 3 decades. My parents have resided in and been homeowners in Glendale for over 3 30 years. Please consider this letter as an expression of my deep concern and frustration with the increasing electric fees charged by Glendale Water and Power.

Our most recent utility bill which covered the time frame of July 8, 2025 to September 6, 2025 was for a total of $1,781.20. We live in a small, single family home consisting of less than 2,000 square feet in size. Of that entire bill, there is a fee of $204.66 for "Services By Other City Departments," without further detail. We believe we should not be responsible for this type of fee as we already pay high premiums for the electricity, water, and applicable taxes. This total amount is extremely high and unreasonable considering the already heightened fees for electricity. Our previous total (from July 2025) was $1,309.17. A jump of over $400 in just a couple of months is unacceptable and unjustified.

The most important and unreasonable part of this situation is the high season electricity rates from July to October. This amount is high compared to Burbank Water and Power which charges rates as low as 0.0294 for the first 300 kWh and 0.1071 for all additional kWh.

Compared to our neighboring city (Burbank), Glendale residents pay almost 4 times as much for essentially identical electricity. It is extremely unaffordable and most residents in this city continue to face hardships in affording these rates.
99 of 334

I support item #4 on the agenda to adjust and redistribute the remaining electric rate increases through 2027. Though much of the damage has already been done, the increases should decrease.

We appreciate your time.

Best,
Dina Issagholi, Esq.

100 of 334

9b
25-88606

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Request to Establish a Standardization of Specialized Gurney Equipment Manufactured by Ferno Washington.

1. Resolution to adopt the standardization policy and authorize the purchase of gurneys and gurney maintenance and repair supplies from Ferno Washington.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Glendale Fire Department currently utilizes Ferno exclusively for the purchase of new gurneys and all equipment and supplies for daily use in conjunction with gurney maintenance and repairs. The Fire Department has used Ferno gurneys since the inception of the paramedic program in 2000. The ability to put these gurneys in a chair configuration allows our first responders to operate in tight spaces, which is common in our service delivery area. The standardization would allow for the purchase of new gurneys and equipment to maintain our existing fleet of twenty-three gurneys. Currently, a staff member is a certified Ferno Advanced Gurney Technician and performs the necessary repairs and maintenance in-house. This ensures our fleet of gurneys are in top working condition with a significant reduction in cost and downtime for repairs and service.

Maintaining a functional and safe fleet of this specialty equipment is critical in the delivery of our service to the community, and our current contract with Ferno expires in December of 2025.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution allowing the City Manager to adopt equipment standardization for the purchase of gurneys, gurney maintenance and repair supplies from Ferno Washington.

ANALYSIS
The Fire Department requires a reliable vendor to supply our Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Division with gurneys, gurney maintenance and repair equipment that is required according to Local and State regulations. Our current contract (8001494-5) with Ferno expires on December 12, 2025, and establishing this standardization with Ferno 101 of 334

9b2
25-88606
6 2
9 3
will ensure that the Department would be supplied with all necessary maintenance and repair equipment for all our Ferno gurneys and future purchases of gurneys.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
NA

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for gurney purchases, gurney repair and maintenance equipment needs of the Fire Department will cost $15,000 this year. Funding has already been approved as a part of the FY 2025-26 budget; therefore, no additional appropriation is being requested at this time. Funding for the remaining years will be addressed during the annual budget process. The City Council approved funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
15,000 GL: 43110-1010-GFD-4001-P0000- General Fund

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Not Applicable

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1: The City Council may deny the Glendale Fire Department’s request. To which, there will be no standardization for the purchase of gurneys, gurney maintenance and purchase of supplies.
2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Jeffrey Brooks, Fire Chief
Prepared by:

Edward Marquez, Acting Battalion Chief
Nayiri Moumdjian, Public Safety Business Administrator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
102 of 334

C:\PGCompilerServiceRelease\temp\glendale\MeetingId_10625\Packet\Pdf\59645\15216\1.docx RESOLUTION NO.______________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING STANDARDIZATION OF MANUFACTURER,

DISPENSING WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND AUTHORIZING THE

PURCHASING ADMINISTRATOR TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT AND

SUPPLIES MANUFACTURED BY FERNO WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, the Glendale Fire Department utilizes gurneys and related equipment and supplies in the service and care of residents who require transport; WHEREAS, the Glendale Fire Department has used Ferno gurneys since the inception of the paramedic program in 2000 and the ability to put these gurneys in a chair configuration allows first responders to operate in tight spaces, which is common in the City’s service delivery area; WHEREAS, currently, a staff member is a certified Ferno Advanced Gurney Technician and performs the necessary repairs and maintenance in-house and this ensures the fleet of gurneys are in top working condition with a significant reduction in cost and downtime for repairs and service;
WHEREAS, standardizing the use of Ferno Washington reflects best practices for the purchase of new equipment, maintenance and repairs and maintaining a functional and safe fleet of this specialty equipment is critical in the delivery of service to the community; WHEREAS, the City of Glendale Purchasing Policy promotes the standardization of commonly used items, and equipment and this process will eliminate repetitive future approvals by the City Council for similar equipment and standardized items need to be reviewed by the Departments at least every five years and need to be approved by City Council at least every ten years.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

1. That the City Council hereby approves Ferno Washington as the City's standard for gurneys and related equipment, maintenance and repairs;

2. That the determination to standardize gurneys, related equipment, maintenance and repairs will be reviewed by the Fire Department and Purchasing Section at least every five years and the Fire Department will seek approval from City Council at least every ten years.

3. That the foregoing facts are deemed to be true and correct and a basis for dispensing with competitive bidding and the Council hereby finds that it is in the best interests of the City to dispense with competitive bidding.

4. The Purchasing Administrator is hereby authorized to issue purchase orders with Knox Corporation for the purchase of narcotic safes and related products and services as needed, as long as the budget is available.

Adopted this __________ day of ______________________, 2025. 103 of 334

C:\PGCompilerServiceRelease\temp\glendale\MeetingId_10625\Packet\Pdf\59645\15216\1.docx _________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Dr. Suzie Abajian, Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ________________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _______ day of ____________________, 2025, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
104 of 334

9c
25-88814

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Appointment of Voting Delegate and Alternative Representative for the 2025 League of California Cities Conference.

1. Motion designating a voting delegate and alternate representative(s) for the 2025 League of California Cities Conference.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendale is actively engaged with various public agencies, joint power authorities, and committees, with City Council members representing the City on many of these entities. Annually in October, the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) hosts an annual conference, and the City Council must designate a voting delegate and alternate representative(s) for the General Assembly.
105 of 334

9c2
25-88814
6 3
7 7

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council appoint a voting delegate and alternate representative(s) for the 2025 League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual Conference – General Assembly.

ANALYSIS
The League of California Cities is an association that advocates for the interests of California's cities, promoting local control and providing a unified voice for municipalities on issues affecting governance, legislation, and public policy. The City Council must designate a voting delegate by council action for the Annual Conference General Assembly, where the delegate will represent Glendale in shaping Cal Cities policies. Each city has one voting delegate who at the General Assembly, will play a direct role in advocating for local decision-making and influencing statewide policy.

While there are no general resolutions scheduled to be voted on at the October 2025 General Assembly at this time, petition resolutions may be introduced during the conference, and General Assembly may convene if a qualified resolution is introduced.

This year’s event will take place on October 8 to 10, 2025 in Long Beach, CA. Upon the appointment of the City’s delegates for 2025, staff will complete the necessary documents timely and before the September 24, 2025 deadline to officially register the City’s voting delegates for the 2025 Annual Conference and General Assembly.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is exempt from CEQA.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
None.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Roubik R. Golanian, City Manager
Prepared by:

Domenica Megerdichian, Assistant to the City Manager
106 of 334

9c3
25-88814
6 3
7 7
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
107 of 334

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale, California hereby designates the following individuals as the voting delegate and alternates for the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) Annual Conference and the annual business meeting to be held at the Annual Conference from October 8 to 10, 2025:

VOTING DELEGATE: ___________________
ALTERNATE VOTING DELEGATE: __________________

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
108 of 334

9d
25-88801

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Status Update on the Activities of the Charter Review Committee Pertaining to Council Districts, Directly Elected Mayor, Council Compensation and Miscellaneous Matters

1. Motion Providing Direction

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for September 30, 2025 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Glendale Charter Review Committee, established in 2024, was tasked with reviewing potential amendments related to Council districts, a directly elected mayor, council size, Council compensation, Civil Service, and other Charter provisions. After extensive study and deliberation in 2025, the Committee voted 7–5 to recommend maintaining the current at-large election system and five-member Council, opposing a shift to district-based elections and a directly elected mayor. While arguments in favor of districts emphasized increased representation, lower campaign costs, and stronger neighborhood voices, those opposed highlighted risks of divisiveness, parochialism, and diminished citywide accountability. The Committee declined to provide recommendations on the number of districts or mayoral duties should Charter amendments nevertheless be placed on the ballot, given its position to retain the existing system.

Beyond governance structure, the Committee recommended amending the Charter to require the City Council to review councilmember compensation at least once every two years, maintaining alignment with state law while ensuring regular accountability. It also recommended smaller updates, including allowing special meetings outside Council Chambers, removing obsolete job titles, and clarifying post-service employment restrictions. Further issues currently under review by the Committee include Civil Service modernization.

Staff seeks feedback relative to districts, directly elected mayor, Council size and Council compensation and any other matters related to Charter amendments the Council chooses to provide.
109 of 334

9d2
25-88801
6 3
6 7

RECOMMENDATION
Staff has no recommendation. Staff seeks direction and feedback regarding potential Charter amendments related to the matters discussed.

ANALYSIS
I. Background
On May 2, 2023, the Council adopted a resolution declaring its intent to transition to City Council districts, with an expanded Council size, and a directly elected mayor, for consideration by the City’s voters at the March 2024 election. The Council also directed staff on preparation of a Charter amendment pertaining to the compensation of the mayor and councilmembers. After continued discussion on these topics through 2023 and 2024, the Council deferred placing these issues on the ballot for either of the March or November 2024 elections, subject to further consideration for placement on the ballot in a future election. The Council established the Charter Review Committee (“Committee”) in 2024 to study potential amendments relating to the Charter.

II. Establishment of Charter Review and Appointment of Members The Council established the Committee by resolution on February 27, 2024. The Council resolution establishing the Committee directs the Committee to prioritize review of City Council districts, expanded Council size, directly elected mayor and the Civil Service system and provide a report and recommendations on those items. The Council appointed 12 members to the Committee in May of 2024.

The Committee commenced meetings in Fall of 2024 and spent the Fall meetings receiving training, receiving an overview of the Charter, and addressing three concrete Charter provisions related to location of Council meetings, removal of obsolete job titles from the Charter, and a clarifying amendment to the provision relative to councilmembers holding City employment after leaving Council (discussed further below).

Districts and Directly Elected Mayor
The Committee commenced the study, review and deliberation of Council districts in January 2025. The Committee received presentations on the council-manager form of government, council districts, forms of governance involving directly elected mayors, including the roles and duties of directly elected mayors, the California Voting Rights Act and provisions of the Elections Code addressing council districts. On April 3, 2025, after deliberation, the Committee held a vote on a motion to recommend that the Council place a Charter amendment on the ballot to transition to a directly elected mayor and six council districts. That motion tied 5-5 (with two members absent). Subsequently, the Committee held another vote at the August 7, 2025, meeting with a full Committee. That motion was to recommend that the Council not place a Charter amendment on the ballot to transition to a directly elected mayor and council districts, i.e., to preserve the status quo. That motion passed with 7 members in favor and 5 against. Thus, the effect of the Committee’s 110 of 334

9d3
25-88801
6 3
6 7
recommendation would be to retain the current system.

The following is a representative list of arguments raised by Committee members regarding a transition from an at-large method to elect councilmembers to a district-based method of election, and establishment of an office of mayor separately elected from councilmembers. The Committee generally viewed a directly elected mayor in conjunction with transitioning to a district-based method of election, such that fewer arguments were independently raised in favor of and against a directly elected mayor.

Council Districts - Arguments Against
Glendale is not required by law to switch to districts In an at-large system, residents can turn to any councilmember rather than the councilmember of their district; this is especially important if the constituent and the district councilmember do not agree on an issue or do not get along. A from-district councilmember cares more for their district than the City as a whole Conflict is created where district councilmembers place competing demands on the City
Districts could lead to greater divisiveness within the community Councilmembers should be elected by a majority of people rather than those in a section of the City, and be responsible for the City and everyone in it, rather than those in their districts
There are major issues and priorities in Glendale upon which Council should focus (e.g., budget and electricity rates)
There are ways other than districts to make the public feel they have representation
Glendale is a medium-size city where residents have more in common than in other cities, like L.A, where there is greater strata in terms of economics and neighborhoods
Have not found a reason for the City to transition to district-based elections, and by extension, a directly elected mayor
oDoes not know what issue switching to districts will solve A minor issue in a particular district could be a significant issue to the rest of the City, and not receive appropriate attention
City has broad, citywide issues that need to be deliberated in a broad, citywide way
Not convinced that funding is the only impediment to candidates from underrepresented areas like South Glendale
Council Districts/Expanded Council - Arguments in Favor Fair chance at representation, because it costs less to run in a district campaign than a citywide election (ex: renters have a better chance at getting elected) oA councilmember can elicit support from a much smaller constituency, which makes for a cheaper election, in turn making government more representative
111 of 334

9d4
25-88801
6 3
6 7
oSociety is better when people can more easily participate in the system; and, by that measure, districts are preferable
oExpanding the size of Council gives more people the opportunity to have a voice on the Council
Districts will make it easier for the most vulnerable to have representation and voice their concerns (easier to voice your concern to a neighbor) Glendale is a full-service city and the level of complexity warrants more people who can devote time to the City’s issues
Districts ensure that the interests of different parts of the City are represented on Council
oPolicies beneficial to a particular area are likely to be overlooked without districts
The same group of people cannot elect all five councilmembers oIf a resident perceives all councilmembers to be the same, they will not talk to any of them about their issues
It is easier for residents to unseat an incumbent councilmember representing a single district
A council districts/elected mayor model supports the kind of government that the community wants to see in 10-15 years, which is government that is more responsive, representative, and democratic
Expanding the size of Council without districts will run a risk down the road of exacerbating any polarization
Directly Elected Mayor - Arguments Against
A directly elected mayor does not work unless there are districts One person setting the Council agenda for the entire mayoral term can have negative consequences
Directly Elected Mayor - Arguments in Favor
A significant, citywide issue requires a point-person in a directly elected mayor who speaks for the City and to whom residents can turn
The at-large mayor will provide balance to district councilmembers oIf there are districts, residents can go to the mayor in addition to their councilmember with their concerns
During Committee discussions on council districts and mayor, staff requested feedback for recommendations on the number of districts and the role and duties of a directly elected mayor even if the Committee were inclined not to recommend a change from the current at-large system. At the September 4, 2025, meeting, the Committee discussed this point and voted to table the discussion, with many members expressing that they would not feel comfortable making recommendations on a governance system with which they did not agree, while others believed the discussion would take time from other matters the Committee still has to discuss, including Civil Service. Hence, the Committee has no recommendations on the number of districts or the role and duties of the directly 112 of 334

9d5
25-88801
6 3
6 7
elected mayor if the Council is inclined to move forward with these proposals.

Council compensation
Article IV, Section 3 of the Charter establishes Council compensation in accordance with the “schedule” and “procedure for adjustment” applicable to Glendale in the California Government Code provisions for general law cities, Government Code Section 36516.

Section 36516 was amended in 2023 (eff. 1/1/24). As amended, the “schedule” is set forth in subsection (a), which allows a city council of a city with more than 150,000 and up to 250,000 in population to adopt an ordinance to establish a salary in an amount up to $2,550 per month. The salary of $2,550 per month may be increased by amendment to the ordinance that does not exceed the greater of (i) 5% per year since the operative date of the last adjustment in salary when the ordinance or amendment is enacted, or (2) an amount equal to inflation since January 1, 2024 based upon CPI, which shall not exceed 10 percent per year. Pursuant to State law and the Charter, salary adjustments adopted by Council do not become effective until after the next general municipal election after the adjustment is adopted. The current Council salary established under a prior version of Section 36516 is $1,430 per month, established by Ordinance No. 5764 adopted in 2011 and effective in April 2013.

The Committee took up the study, consideration and deliberation of Council salaries and compensation starting at the May 2025 meeting. The Committee reviewed the different compensation models that were presented to Council in 2023. The Committee initially considered a proposal for a Charter amendment that would establish a Charter-created Council Compensation Commission that would review Council compensation issues at least every two years. However, consensus on this concept did not materialize and a consensus coalesced around a Charter amendment that would simply require the Council to consider adjustments in accordance with the Charter, and incorporated State law provisions at least once every two years. The proposed Charter language recommended by the Committee is as follows:
“Article IV Officers and Employees Generally
§ 3 Compensation.
(1) Compensation and increase in compensation of council members.

Compensation for council members is hereby set, and from time to time shall be changed, in accordance with the schedule and procedure for adjustment applicable to the City of Glendale set forth in the provisions of the Government Code relating to salaries of council members in general law cities. No later than one year following each general municipal election, and no less frequently than once every two years, the council shall determine at a public meeting whether and the extent to which compensation for council members shall be changed in accordance with the Government Code. Any such determination shall be supported with written findings setting forth the basis for the decision, including any reasons for maintaining the current compensation. The compensation of 113 of 334

9d6
25-88801
6 3
6 7
council members may also be increased during the terms of their respective offices by vote of the electors.” (See also Exhibit 1)
The Committee expressed its opinion that maintaining the current structure utilizing the State law schedule and procedure for adjustment for salary setting is the best approach, with a requirement for a biennial check-in, for the following reasons:

The Charter currently provides a mechanism for the Council to adjust compensation; the recommendation cures avoidance of the subject by requiring the Council to regularly address it
Requiring the Council to regularly determine whether to adjust compensation changes the status quo because compensation has not been adjusted for 12 years Requiring the Council to regularly determine whether to adjust compensation affords the public an opportunity to voice whether councilmembers are paid too much, too little, or appropriately
Requiring the Council to make findings in order to adjust compensation would serve posterity and benefit future councils as well as the public Other Charter Provisions
The Committee also recommended revisions to a couple of other smaller, more finite Charter provisions (Exhibit 1).
Location of Council meetings: The Charter currently requires all Council meetings to be held in the Council Chambers absent an emergency. Any Council item requiring deliberation and a Council vote must occur in Chambers. As recommended by the Committee, this requirement would remain for regular meetings of the Council, but the Charter would be amended to allow flexibility for special meetings to occur outside of Chambers in the community. Obsolete job titles and positions: This amendment would remove some obsolete job titles from the Charter – including Director of Administrative Services (now Director of Finance), Maintenance Services Administrator, and City Assessor. Holding Compensated City Office or City Employment After Council Service: This proposed amendment would confirm the current interpretation of a current provision of the Charter that the prohibition on holding compensated City office or employment within two years of Council service does not apply to the elected positions of Clerk or Treasurer or that of a councilmember appointed to Council in the event of a vacancy.

Additional Issues for Committee Review
The Committee will be reviewing the following matters, either per the Council direction or upon its own request:
Civil Service: As previously discussed, the City is reviewing potential amendments 114 of 334

9d7
25-88801
6 3
6 7
to the Charter relating to the Civil Service in an attempt to modernize or provide flexibility to the current system. The Committee will review and provide recommendations. Any potential changes will also require meet-and-confer with the City’s employee associations and review by the Civil Service Commission prior to consideration by Council. Among the topics to be studied are the Rule of Three, limitation on the probationary period to 12 months, length of eligibility lists, department heads in Civil Service, bumping rules during layoffs, and duration of layoff and reinstatement lists.
Appointed City Treasurer: The Committee recently asked to have a discussion of making the City Treasurer an appointed position. The Committee had previously asked to have a discussion about adding to the qualifications of the Treasurer, presumably if the position remains as an elected position. Elected City Attorney: The Committee asked to have a discussion of making the City Attorney an elected position.
Gender Neutral Terms: In several places, the Charter uses masculine gender terms such as “his” or “him.” The Charter was amended in 2005 to provide that the “masculine gender shall include the feminine.” Article I, Sec. 2. However, there may be a desire to further address this issue.
Financial Provisions: A request was made to study a cleanup of antiquated language in the Charter pertaining to finance and accounting.

Timing and Procedural Considerations
There are timing and procedural issues the Council should consider. The City’s voters may approve Charter amendments at a general municipal election, statewide general election or statewide primary election. However, pursuant to Elections Code §1415, any “Charter proposal that proposes to amend a Charter alter any procedural or substantive protection, right, benefit, or employment status of any local government employee” must be placed on the statewide general election ballot, e.g., November 2026, 2028. Because any amendments to the Charter Civil Service provisions (or at least some of them) implicate substantive protections, rights, benefits or status of local government employees, those amendments – if the Council chooses to pursue them – will have to be considered at the November 2026 election.

Additionally, if the Council chooses to pursue a plan involving Council districts and directly elected mayor and chooses to do so by picking the maps subject to voter approval of the Charter amendments (as previously discussed), given the time gap since the last public outreach and education effort on the proposed maps, it is advisable to conduct additional public outreach on those maps. The Council may choose to start the district map process anew, with the understanding of incurring additional costs in doing so. It is worth noting if the Council is inclined to defer Charter amendments to the November election, it will have more time to consider the direction it wants to provide related to council districts and a directly elected mayor if different than the Committee.

The next statewide primary election is June 2, 2026, which is also the date of the City’s general municipal election, and the statewide general election date is November 3, 2026. 115 of 334

9d8
25-88801
6 3
6 7
The last date to place Charter amendments on the ballot for the June 2, 2026, election is Tuesday, March 3, 2026, and the last date to place Charter amendments on the ballot for the statewide general election is Tuesday, August 4, 2026.

Direction – Options
The Committee will continue its work through the remainder of 2025 and into 2026 per Council direction and provide a final report and recommendations for Council consideration. Given the additional staff work and outreach that may be required related to Charter amendments related to districts, expanded Council size, directly elected mayor, and Council compensation, staff seeks feedback and direction.

Council Districts/Directly Elected Mayor
The Council may:
Accept the Committee’s recommendation to make no change to the City’s at-large election system and five-seat City Council, and direct staff to take no further action relative to Council districts and a directly elected mayor Reject the Committee’s recommendation to not transition to Council districts and have a directly elected mayor, and direct staff to return with proposed language on districts and a directly elected mayor, including the role and duties of the mayor Reject the Committee’s recommendation to not transition to Council districts and have a directly elected mayor, and refer the matter back to the Committee to make recommendations on the size of the Council and role and duties of the Mayor The Council can choose an alternative not identified by staff Council compensation
The Council may:
Accept the Committee’s recommendation to submit a measure to the voters that would amend the Charter to require the City Council to review Council compensation at least once every other year
Reject the Committee’s recommendation and direct staff to prepare Charter language on alternative proposals for Council compensation Reject the Committee’s recommendation and direct staff to take no further action on a Charter amendment pertaining to Council compensation Choose an alternative not identified by staff
116 of 334

9d9
25-88801
6 3
6 7
Other Charter provisions
The Council can accept some or all of the Committee’s recommendations to amend the Charter pertaining to location of Council meetings, removal of obsolete titles/positions, and City employment after Council service.

Other Matters
The Council can provide whatever other direction it deems appropriate on other matters being reviewed by the Committee.

Timing
Although the Council is not being asked to make any specific decision at this meeting to place Charter amendments on any particular election ballot, Council may provide feedback or input on the timing of placement of these measures on the ballot for planning purposes. To summarize, the options will include:
Council may place all Charter amendments on the ballot at the November 2026 election
Council may place potential Civil Service amendments on the ballot at the November 2026 election and other Charter amendments, including districts, directly elected mayor, and compensation on the ballot at the June 2026 election; Council may choose a mix of the above options as long as potential Civil Service amendments are placed on the November 2026 ballot
Council may choose not to place any potential Charter amendments on the ballot Council may choose an alternative not identified by staff

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The Charter Review Committee is comprised of 12 Glendale residents representing a broad cross-section of the community.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Creation of an office of directly elected mayor, establishment of council districts, an expansion of the number of council seats and adjustments to Council compensation will have fiscal impacts that will be provided if Council provides direction to move forward with Charter amendments incorporating any of those components of potential Charter revisions. Staff will provide an assessment of fiscal impacts if Council directs staff to prepare Charter amendments.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This activity involves organizational and administrative activities of the government related to election procedures and eligibility requirements, and such internal procedural and eligibility changes have no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the 117 of 334

9d10
25-88801
6 3
6 7
environment. As such, this action is not a “project” subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 14 Cal. Code Regs § 15378.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
There is no staff recommendation. Staff seeks direction or input as discussed above.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Prepared by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Aaron M. Israel, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Sylvia Quach, Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Charter Amendment Language Approved by Charter Review Committee Related to location of Council meetings, obsolete job titles, City employment after Council service, and Council compensation

2. Minutes and Draft Minutes of Charter Review Committee Meetings 118 of 334

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that regarding the Report to Council dated September 30, 2025, pertaining to the Status Update on the Activities of the Charter Review Committee Pertaining to Council Districts, Directly Elected Mayor, Council Compensation and Miscellaneous Matters, the Council directs staff as follows:
Council Districts, Expanded Council, & Directly Elected Mayor:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
Council Compensation:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________
Location of Council Meetings, Obsolete Titles/Positions, Compensated Employment After Council Service:
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Other Matters
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ 119 of 334

Timing
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
120 of 334

Location of City Council Meetings
Article VI The Council Generally

§ 2 Council meetings.

The council shall hold regular meetings at such times as it shall fix by ordinance or resolution. If a regular meeting falls on a holiday such meeting shall be held on the next business day.

Special council meetings may be called at any time by the mayor, or by three members of the council, acting in accordance with State law.

Any regular, adjourned regular, special, or adjourned special meeting may be adjourned to a time and place specified in the order of adjournment. Any adjourned regular meeting is a regular meeting for all purposes.

All regular council meetings shall be held in the council chamber of the City Hall, or in a place to which any meeting may be adjourned for the purpose of taking evidence or holding hearings.

Final deliberation and actual voting by the council shall take place in the City Hall council chamber. Provided, however, if by reason of fire, flood, reconstruction, or other emergency it shall be unsafe to meet in the council chamber, the regular meetings shall be held for the duration of the reconstruction or emerge ncy at a place designated by the mayor or by three members of the council.

Editor's Note: The catchline of this section originally read as follows: "Meetings." 121 of 334

Obsolete Titles of Oﬃcers & Employees

Note: The Committee approved a recommended amendment to remove the obsolete oﬃces of City Assessor and Maintenance Services Administrator from the City Charter, and to replace references to the Director of Administrative Services with references to the Director of Finance. References to these positions outside of the Charter (i.e., in the Municipal Code) are not included here. Statutory references, editor’s notes, and other reference notes are not included here.

Article IV Oﬃcers and Employees Generally
§ 1 Generally.

The oﬃcers of the City of Glendale shall be ﬁve members of the council, a city assessor, a city tax collector, a city manager, a director of ﬁnance administrative services, a city clerk, a city treasurer, a city attorney, a director of public works, a city engineer, a maintenance services administrator, a building oﬃcial, a chief of police and a ﬁre chief. The council may also provide by ordinance for additional oﬃces and for the duties thereof, and for additional duties of oﬃces herein provided for, but in no such manner as to encroach upon the duties of any oﬃcer as provided for by this Charter. The council may also provide by ordinance for such subordinate oﬃcers, assistants, deputies, clerks, and employees in the several oﬃces and departments as they deem necessary. The members of the council, the city treasurer and the city clerk shall be elected from the city at large, as provided in this Charter. All other oﬃcers, assistants, deputies, clerks and employees shall be appointed as provi ded in this Chart er , or as the c ouncil ma y pr ovide by ordinance in case no provision for their appointment is herein made, and shall hold their respective oﬃces or positions at the pleasure of the appointing power. Where the appointment of any of said oﬃ cers, assistants, deputies, clerks or employees is vested in the council or any commission, such appointment and any removal must be made by a three-ﬁfths (3/5) vote of the members of the appointing power. (1921; 1947; 1953; 1957.)
(Res. No. 18-10 § 1, 2018; Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)

Article VI The Council Generally
§ 5 Certain powers and duties enumerated.

The council shall:

1. Qualiﬁcations of Members and Election Returns. Judge the qualiﬁcations of its members and all election returns;

2. Rules of Proceedings. Establish rules for its proceedings;

3. Record of Proceedings. Cause a correct record of its proceedings to be kept. The ayes and noes shall on demand of any member, be taken and entered therein, and they shall be recorded on all votes passing any ordinance or appointing or dismissing or conﬁrming the appointment or dismissal of any oﬃcer, or authorizing the execution of contracts, or the appropriation or payment of money;

4. Mayor Generally. Choose one of its members as presiding oﬃcer, to be called mayor. The mayor shall preside over the sessions of the council, shall sign oﬃcial documents when the signature of the council or mayor is required by law, and he shall act as the oﬃcial head of the city on public and ceremonial occasions. He shall have power to administer oaths and aﬃrmations. When the mayor is absent from any 122 of 334

Obsolete Titles of Oﬃcers & Employees

meeting of the council, the mayor pro tem shall be selected monthly by alphabetical rotation. The mayor pro tem shall act as mayor if the mayor is absent or unavailable;

5. Appointment of Certain Oﬃcers. Appoint a city assessor, which oﬃce may be combined with that of the city clerk, a city tax collector, a city attorney, and city manager;

6. 5. Supervision of Public Utilities. Exercise general supervision and direction over all persons, ﬁrms, companies and corporations owning, controlling or operating public utilities, in so far as any of them are subject to municipal control. This provision is subject to other Charter provisions relative to such public utilities as now are or may hereafter be owned by the city. (1921; 1947; 1953.)

Article XI Fiscal Administration
§ 1 Powers and duties of director of ﬁnance administrative services generally.

The director of ﬁnance administrative services shall be the general accountant of the city. He shall receive and preserve in his oﬃce all accounts, books, vouchers, documents and papers relating to accounts and contracts of the city, its disbursements, revenues and other ﬁnancial aﬀairs. He shall k eep an account of all moneys paid into and out of the treasury, and shall draw and sign all warrants on the treasurer for payment of money out of the treasury, except as otherwise provided in this Charter or by general law. The city clerk shall furnish the director of ﬁnance administrative services with copies of all ordinances, resolutions and orders of the council making appropriations or authorizing expenditures of money for any purpose. All orders for the purchase of goods, materials or supplies, and all orders or contracts proposed to be entered into by the city by virtue of which any money shall or may become payable by the city, except contracts, the expense of which is to be paid by assessments upon properties beneﬁted or aﬀected thereby, shall before becoming eﬀective, on behalf of the cit y , be pr esent ed to the dir ector of ﬁnance administrative services and have indorsed thereon his certiﬁcate that there remains unexpended and unapplied in the city treasury as provided by this Charter, a balance of the appropriation or fund applicable thereto suﬃcient to pay the estimated expense to be incurred during the then current ﬁscal year under said order or contract as estimated by the board or oﬃcer making the same, or that adequate provision therefor has been made in the tax levy, or by other revenues to be received by the city as estimated in the budgets. It shall be the duty of the director of ﬁnance administrative services to make such endorsement upon every such contract or order so presented to him if there remains unexpended and unapplied the said estimated amount in any appropriation fund or tax levy, or other estimated revenue applicable thereto, and thereafter he shall hold and retain the said amount to pay the expense to be incurred under said order or contract until the same is fully performed and expense paid. (Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)
§ 4 Procedure as to warrants on treasurer; authority of council as to presentation, approval and payment of demands against city.

All demands approved by the proper board, commission or oﬃcer shall be presented to the director of ﬁnance administrative services, who shall examine the same; and if the amount thereof is legally due and there remains on his books an unexhausted balance or an appropriation against which the same may be charged, he shall approve such demand and draw and sign his warrant on the treasurer therefor, payable 123 of 334

Obsolete Titles of Oﬃcers & Employees

out of the proper fund. Objections of the director of ﬁnance administrative services to any demand may be overruled by the council, and the director of ﬁnance administrative services shall thereupon draw his warrant as directed by the council. Such warrants when presented to the treasurer, shall be paid by him out of the fund therein designated, if there be suﬃcient money in such fund for that purpose. A warrant n ot p aid f or lac k of funds shall be registered, and all registered warrants shall be paid in the order of registration when funds are available therefor. The director of ﬁnance administrative services shall draw his warrants for payment of municipal or other bonds payable out of funds in the treasury upon presentation and surrender of the proper bonds or coupons, without approval of any body or oﬃcer. The council may make further regulations by ordinance regarding the presentation, approval and payment of demands against the city.
(Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)
§ 9 Authority of council to provide for system of taxation; tax liens; authority of council to designate assessor and tax collector.

The council shall have power by ordinance, to provide a system for the assessment, levy, and collection of all city taxes, which system shall conform as nearly as may be to the general laws of this state, provided for the assessment, levy and collection of county taxes. All taxes levied, together with any penalties imposed for delinquency and the cost of collection, shall constitute liens on the property assessed and every tax upon personal property shall be a lien upon the real property of the owner thereo f. The said liens shall attach as of the ﬁrst Monday of March of each year. The council may provide that the city clerk shall be ex oﬃcio assessor and that the city treasurer or other oﬃcer selected by them, shall be ex oﬃcio tax collector.
§ 10 Assessment, collection, etc., of taxes by oﬃcers of County of Los Angeles.

The council shall have power by ordinance to authorize the transfer to and the assumption and discharge by oﬃcers of the County of Los Angeles, of any function of the city relating to the assessment of property for taxation, the equalization of such assessment, the collection of taxes levied for municipal purposes, the collection of assessments levied for local improvements, the sale of property for nonpayment of assessments levied for local improvements, and the redemption of property from sales for either of said purposes, and may repeal any such ordinances.

Until the council shall otherwise provide, the ordinance of said City of Glendale now in eﬀect providing that the duties of assessing property and collecting taxes provided by law to be performed by the assessor and the tax collector of the City of Glendale, shall be performed by the county assessor and the county tax collector of the County of Los Angeles, shall remain in full force and eﬀect. During the time that said present ordinance, or any other ordinance passed by the council in pursuance of this section for the same purpose, shall be in eﬀect, the mode and manner of assessing property for purposes of municipal taxation, the equalization of such assessments, the levying and collecting of taxes for municipal purposes, the nature of the lien therefor and the manner and method of enforcing the same and of the redemption of property sold for nonpayment of taxes, and all proceedings relating to said matters, shall be substantially the same as ma y be provided by law for such matters in relation to county tax es of the County of Los Angeles, so far as applicable, unless the council shall provide otherwise by ordinance. 124 of 334

Obsolete Titles of Oﬃcers & Employees

During the time that the functions of the city, relating to the assessment and collection of city taxes, are b e in g d isc h ar g e d b y t h e oﬃc e r s of t he Cou n t y of Los An g e le s, th e oﬃc es of city assessor and city tax collector shall be deemed suspended and no person shall ﬁll the same, nor shall any salary attach thereto, and all duties of said oﬃces other than the assessment and collection of taxes shall be transferred to and performed by such oﬃcers as the council shall by ordinance determine.

Article XXI Public Works Department
§ 3 Duties of maintenance services administrator.

The maintenance services administrator shall have the general care and supervision of streets and of the maintenance and repair thereof and the care of and custody of tools and implements belonging to the City of Glendale and used for street construction and repair. (1953; 1957.) (Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)

Article XXIII Miscellaneous Provisions
§ 14 Payment into city treasury of moneys received from taxes, licenses, fees, etc.

All moneys received from taxes, licenses, fees, ﬁnes, penalties and forfeitures, and all moneys which may be collected or received by any oﬃcer of the city in his oﬃcial capacity, or by any department of the city, for the performance of any oﬃcial d uty, and all moneys accruing to the city from any source, and all moneys directed by law , or by this Charter , to be paid or deposited in the treasury, shall be paid into the treasury daily.

The treasurer shall receipt for each such deposit in triplicate, giving the original and duplicate to the depositor, who must ﬁle the duplicate with the director of ﬁnance administrative services. § 22 Oﬃcers to report fees, etc., monthly.

On the ﬁrst day of each month every oﬃcer authorized by law to charge any fee, commission, percentage, allowance or compensation, must make a written report to the director of ﬁnance administrative services of all moneys received by him during the preceding month. (Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)

Article XXIV Civil Service
§ 5 Suspension of competition.
(1) In case of a vacancy in a position requiring peculiar and exceptional qualiﬁcations of a scientiﬁc, professional, or expert character, and upon satisfactory evidence that competition is impracticable and that the position can best be ﬁlled by the selection of some designated person of recognized attainments, the commission may, after public hearing and by the aﬃrmative vote of all its members, suspend competition, but no such suspension shall be general in its application to such position, and all such cases 125 of 334

Obsolete Titles of Oﬃcers & Employees

of suspension shall be reported, together with the reasons therefor, in the annual report of the commission.
(2) In case of a vacancy in the position of director of ﬁnance administrative services, city attorney or his assistants or deputies, director of public works, building oﬃcial, city engineer, maintenance services administrator, head or chief librarian, or in an oﬃce created by ordinance, and upon the ﬁling with the commission of a written statement by the appointing agency that it intends to appoint a designated person of recognized attainments to ﬁll such vacancy, competition shall be suspended. (1933; 1937; 1957.) (Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)
§ 7 Application of article; exception as to unclassiﬁed service.

The provisions of this article shall apply to all positions now existing or hereafter created, except those in the unclassiﬁed service.

The unclassiﬁed service shall consist of the following oﬃces and employments:

All oﬃcers elected by the people.

All members of appointive boards and commissions, and persons serving without compensation.

The chief examiner of the civil service commission.

The city assessor.

The city manager.

The assistant city manager.

The secretary of the city manager.

The city tax collector.

One secretary of any oﬃcer elected by the people.

Special oﬃcers of the police and ﬁre departments.

Positions in any unskilled labor class created for a special or temporary purpose and which do not exist for a period of longer than thirty days; provided that the commission may, upon application of the appointing agency and after public notice and hearin g, by the aﬃrmative vot e of f our-ﬁfths (4/5) of its members, exempt any position in any unskilled labor class or any part-time, seasonal or temporary position for such period of time as it may determine; and provided further, that any such exemption sha ll not aﬀect the tenure of any person whose appointment has become complete under this article.

Persons employed to render professional, scientiﬁc, technical or expert service of an occasional and exceptional character. (1933; 1937; 1947; 1953.)
Editor's Note: The catchline of this section originally read as follows: "Unclassiﬁed and classiﬁed service." (Res. No. 13-802 § 1; Res. No. 04-238 § 1, 2004)
§ 10 Procedure as to appointments.
126 of 334

Obsolete Titles of Oﬃcers & Employees

The person or persons having authority of appointment shall notify the commission of any appointment made, and the commission shall certify such fact to the director of ﬁnance administrative services. The director of ﬁnance administrative services shall not approve any salary or compensation for services to any person holding or performing the duties of a position in the classiﬁed service until the appointment shall have been so certiﬁed. (1933; 1937.)
127 of 334

Councilmembers Holding Other City Employment
Article VI The Council Generally
§ 12 Councilmembers holding other city oﬃces.

A councilmember shall not hold any other city oﬃce or city employment except as authorized by State law or ordinarily necessary in the performance of the duties as a councilmember. No former councilmember shall hold any compensated city oﬃce or city employment until two years after leaving the oﬃce of councilmember. The preceding sentence shall not apply to the elected positions of city clerk or city treasurer, or an appointment of a councilmember in the event of a vacancy. 128 of 334

Councilmember Compensation
Article IV Oﬃcers and Employees Generally

§ 3 Compensation.

(1) Compensation and increase in compensation of council members. Compensation for council members is hereby set, and from time to time shall be changed, in accordance with the schedule and procedure for adjustment applicable to the City of Glendale set forth in the provisions of the Government Code relating to salaries of council members in general law cities. No later than one year following each general municipal election, and no less fr equen tly than onc e e ve ry t w o yea r s, the council shall determine at a public meeting whether and the extent to which compensation for council members shall be changed in accordance with the Government Code. Any such determination shall be supported with writing ﬁndings setting forth the basis for the decision, including any reasons for maintaining the current compensation.

The compensation of council members may also be increased during the terms of their respective oﬃces by vote of the electors.
129 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes of Meeting
October 3, 2024, at 5:00 PM

1. Regular Business Agenda
a. The Agenda for the October 3, 2024 meeting of the Charter Review Committee
was posted September 30, 2024, on the Bulletin Board
Outside City Hall.
b. Roll Call
• The meeting was called to order on October 3, 2024 at 5:00 PM • Present: Commissioner Durham, Commissioner Garibyan, Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Povalitis, Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Harutyunyan, Commissioner Megerdichian, Commissioner Karapetian, Commissioner Yoo, Commissioner Meek, Commissioner Flower
• Absent: Commissioner Manasserian

1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• None.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• There were no previous minutes to approve.

3. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Introductions

4. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY
a. Review of Applicable Laws – Brown Act, Public Records Act, and City of Glendale’s Code of Conduct
b. City Charter Basics
c. Scope of Work
• Primary topics for review:
▪ Directly elected Mayor
▪ Council districts
▪ Expansion of Council
▪ Role and duties of the Mayor, Council, and City Manager 130 of 334

▪ Compensation of Council Members
▪ Civil Service System
▪ Location of Council Meetings
▪ Urgency Ordinances
▪ Cleanup items
▪ Additional Issues as Directed by Council
• The Committee aims to complete recommendations to Council by the end of 2025 in preparation for the June 2026 election.
• It was clarified that while the Council provided initial topics, the committee could propose additional items, coordinating with the Council for alignment. • The Committee will focus on recommendations and the City Attorney’s office will draft the legal language, with opportunities for the Committee to review. • In the event of a tie vote in the Committee, the recommendation would not move forward as an approved recommendation, but the Council would be informed of the split.
• The importance of public input throughout the process was emphasized and a discussion was had on ways to share information with the public while adhering to the Brown Act.

5. FUTURE AGENDAS
• Members will discuss whether to adopt a chair model or have staff continue to facilitate meetings
• Charter sections will be reviewed by topic rather than sequentially through the Charter
• Members requested advance notice of agenda items to allow time for preparation and research
• Staff will explore providing city emails to committee members for official communication

6. ADJOURNMENT @ 6:47PM
• Meeting Adjourned at 6:47 p.m.
131 of 334

Roll Ca
ll

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes of Meeting
November 7, 2024, at 5:00 PM
• The meeting was called to order on November 7, 2024, at 5:00 PM • Present: Commissioner Durham, Commissioner Smith, Commissioner Povalitis, Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Harutyunyan, Commissioner Megerdichian, Commissioner Yoo, Commissioner Meek, Commissioner Flower, • Absent: Commissioner Garibyan, Commissioner Manasserian, Commissioner Karapetian (arrived during Item 5.a.)
Regular Business Agenda
The Agenda for the November 7, 2024, meeting of the Charter Review Committee was posted
November 5, 2024, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• None.

APPRO

VAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Commissioner Flower
• Second: Commissioner Durham
REPO
RTS – INFORMATION ONLY
Overview of Glendale City Charter
Recent Charter Amendment History
Timeline for Charter Review Committee Work
BUSI

NESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
Selection of a Chair
• The Committee expressed a desire to elect a chair soon but wanted more time together before making this decision. This item will be tabled for future meetings.

FUTURE

AGENDAS
• Commissioners requested starting with a smaller item to get used to the process, then move to a larger priority item.

ADJOURNM
ENT @ 6:20 PM
• Motion: Commissioner Flower
• Second: Commissioner Povalitis
132 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes of Meeting
December 12, 2024, at 5:00 PM

1. Roll Call
• The meeting was called to order on December 12, 2024 at 5:00 PM • Present: Committee Member Durham, Committee Member Flower, Committee Member Garibyan, Committee Member Karapetian, Committee Member Manasserian, Committee Member Megerdichian, Committee Member Meek, Committee Member Povalitis, Committee Member Smith
• Absent: Committee Member Harutunyan, Committee Member Miller, Committee Member Yoo

2. Regular Business Agenda
a) The Agenda for the December 12, 2024 meeting of the Charter Review Committee was posted November 26, 2024, on the
Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• None

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Meek
• Second: Committee Member Durham

5. REPORTS – INFORMATION ONLY

6. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a) Review of Charter Language for Potential Revisions
i. Location of City Council Meetings
• The Committee requested draft language from the City Attorney’s Office for options for special meetings and flexibility for regular meetings.
ii. Removal of Obsolete Officer/Employee Positions
• A Motion was passed to make the following changes:

DRAFT
133 of 334

o Elimination of the outdated City Assessor and Maintenance Services Administrator positions (Article IV, Section 1)
o Change of the outdated Director of Administrative Services title to Director of Finance (Article IV, Section 1)
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Meek
• Second: Committee Member Flower
iii. Cleanup of Article VI, Section 12 Pertaining to
Councilmembers holding other offices during term and 2
years after leaving office
• The Committee requested draft language from the City Attorney’s Office to vote on during a future meeting.
b) Review of items regarding Committee scope and timeline c) Continued discussion regarding selection of a Chair
• The Committee determined that a Chair will be selected during the next meeting.

7. FUTURE AGENDAS
• The next meeting will take place on January 9th, 2025 in the Council Chambers • The Committee requested an Agenda Item to establish a schedule for the 2025 calendar year

8. ADJOURNMENT @ 6:19 PM
• Motion: Committee Member Meek
• Second: Committee Member Manasserian
DRAFT
134 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
January 16, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
• The meeting was called to order on January 16, 2025 at 5:14 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunuan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Miller, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo

Absent: None

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the January 16, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on January 14, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• One speaker was heard from the audience.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Durham
• Second: Committee Member Flower
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunuan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Miller

5. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Selection of a Chair
• Committee Member Flower, Povilaitis, and Miller were nominated for Chair • Miller did not accept her nomination
• Flower was voted as Chair with 7 votes; Povilaitis received 5 votes • Chair Flower requested to agendize selection of a Vice Chair for the next meeting. 135 of 334

b. Review of Proposed Charter Language Regarding the Location of City Council Meetings
• Version 2 of the proposed Charter language was approved with 7 votes. o Motion: Committee Member Karapetian
o Second: Committee Member Povilaitis
Ayes: Durham, Harutunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith
Noes: Flower, Garibyan, Meek, Yoo

Absent: None
Abstain: Megerdichian
c. Review of Proposed Charter Language Removing Obsolete Officer/Employee Positions
• Proposed Charter language was approved with 12 votes. o Motion: Committee Member Meek
o Second: Committee Member Manasserian
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunuan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Miller, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
• The Committee requested bringing back an agenda item addressing gender-neutral language across the entire Charter
d. Review of Proposed Charter Cleanup Language to Article VI, Section 12 Pertaining to Councilmembers Holding Other Offices During Term and 2 Years After Leaving Office
• The Committee approved Charter language for 9 votes.
o Motion: Committee Member Durham
o Second: Committee Member Miller
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunuan, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Miller, Meek, Povilaitis
Noes: Karapetian, Smith, Yoo

Absent: None
Abstain: None
136 of 334

• One public comment was heard from the audience.
e. Discussion of Subjects Pertaining to Council Districts, Expanded Council, Directly Elected Mayor and Role of Directly Elected Mayor • The Committee discussed the Item and requested information from staff. • Staff indicated they would provide a presentation on the California Voter Rights Act at a future meeting
• Staff offered to provide a curated list of meeting dates and video links for all previous Council discussions related to districts, directly elected Mayor considerations, and public hearings related to the district mapping process
• Committee Member Garibyan left the meeting at 6:37 PM. • One caller was accepted but was not present during the item. • One public comment was made from the audience.
f. Resolution to establish a 2025 meeting calendar
• Staff will present a draft resolution at the next meeting.

6. REPORTS - INFORMATION ONLY

7. FUTURE AGENDAS
• Districting and directly elected mayor discussions
• Vice Chair election
• Information regarding Civil Service Designations
• Frequency of Council meetings by Charter

8. ADJOURNMENT @ 7:35 PM
• Motion: Committee Member Megerdichian
• Second: Committee Member Povilaitis
137 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
February 6, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
• The meeting was called to order on February 6, 2025 at 5:00 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunuan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo

Absent: None

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the February 6, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on January 31, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• One speaker and one caller were heard

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Meek
• Second: Committee Member Miller
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunuan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Miller

5. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Selection of a Vice Chair
• Committee Member Povilaitis was nominated for Vice Chair • Povilaitis was voted as Vice Chair with 12 votes
138 of 334

b. Resolution of the Charter Review Committee Establishing a Regular Meeting Schedule
• A Resolution establishing a regular meeting schedule of the first Thursday of every month was approved with 12 votes.
o Motion: Committee Member Durham
o Second: Committee Member Megerdichian
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Miller, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
c. Composition of the City Council (At-Large District Elections, Number of City Council Seats, Appointed Versus Directly-Elected Mayor)

1. California Voting Rights Act

2. California Election Code Applicability

3. Expanded Council Costs
• One speaker and one caller were heard

6. REPORTS - INFORMATION ONLY

7. FUTURE AGENDAS
• Composition of City Council

8. ADJOURNMENT @ 7:14 PM
• Motion: Committee Member Megerdichian
• Second: Committee Member Meek
139 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
March 6, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
• The meeting was called to order on March 6, 2025 at 5:00 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunian, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo

Absent: None

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the March 6, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on March 3, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• One speaker and was heard

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Vice Chair Povilaitis
• Second: Committee Member Meek
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunian, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

5. STAFF COMMENTS

6. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Composition of the City Council (At-Large District Elections, Number of City Council Seats, Appointed Versus Directly-Elected Mayor) • Two speakers were heard
140 of 334

7. REPORTS - INFORMATION ONLY

8. FUTURE AGENDAS
• Composition of City Council

9. ADJOURNMENT @ 7:19 PM
• Motion: Vice Chair Povilaitis
• Second: Committee Member Miller
141 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
April 3, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
• The meeting was called to order on April 3, 2025 at 5:10 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunian, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo

Absent: Megerdichian, Miller

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the April 3, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on March 28, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• Two speakers were heard

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Member Manasserian
• Second: Committee Member Meek
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutunian, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: Megerdichian, Miller
Abstain: None

5. STAFF COMMENTS

6. REPORTS - INFORMATION ONLY
a. Restricting Termed-Out Official from Seeking Other Office Precluded (Oral Report)

7. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Council Governance
142 of 334

1. Discussion Regarding the Office of Mayor (i.e., Appointed or Directly Elected) and, if Directly Elected, the Powers, Duties, and Term Thereof, and Term Limit Therefor
a. Motion Making Recommendations to City Council
• Three speakers were heard

2. Discussion Regarding City Council Method of Election (i.e., At-Large or District-Based and, if District-Based, Number of Districts) a. Motion Making Recommendations to City Council
• Motion from Member Meek: Introduce 6 districts with an at-large mayor • Second: Member Garibyan
Ayes: Flower, Garibyan, Meek, Smith, Yoo
Noes: Durham, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Povilaitis

Absent: Megerdichian, Miller
Abstain: None
• The Motion was tied and did not pass.
• Committee members discussed bringing this item back at a future meeting.

8. FUTURE AGENDAS
• Districting, Directly Elected Mayor
• Council Compensation
• Campaign Contribution Limits
• One speaker was heard.

9. ADJOURNMENT @ 7:23 PM
• Motion: Member Meek
• Second: Member Karapetian
143 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
May 1, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
 The meeting was called to order on May 1, 2025 at 5:15 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Karapetian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith

Absent: Harutyunyan, Manasserian, Yoo

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the May 1, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on April 28, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
 The Committee heard from two callers and two speakers in the audience

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
 Motion to approve: Committee Member Meek
 Second: Committee Member Povilaitis
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Karapetian, Meek, Povilaitis, Smith
Noes: None

Absent: Harutyunyan, Manasserian, Yoo
Abstain: Megerdichian, Miller

5. STAFF COMMENTS

6. REPORTS - INFORMATION ONLY

7. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Council Salaries
 The Committee heard from one speaker in the audience
DRAFT
144 of 334

b. Campaign Contribution Limits
 Committee Member Garibyan left the meeting at 6:32 p.m.  The Committee heard from one speaker in the audience.

8. FUTURE AGENDAS
 Special Meeting in June
 The Committee heard from one speaker in the audience

9. ADJOURNMENT @ 7:14 PM
 Motion: Member Karapetian
 Second: Member Miller
DRAFT
145 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
June 5, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL CALL
• The meeting was called to order on June 5, 2025 at 5:00 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan (arrived at 5:39), Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller,
Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo

Absent: None

2. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the June 5, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on June 2, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• The Committee heard from one caller and one speaker in the audience.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Meek
• Second: Committee Member Megerdichian
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Karapetian, Meek, Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith
Noes: None

Absent: Garibyan (arrived at 5:39)
Abstain: Harutyunyan, Manasserian, Yoo

5. STAFF COMMENTS

6. REPORTS - INFORMATION ONLY

7. BUSINESS/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Follow-Up Discussion of Council Salaries/Compensation • Committee Member Garibyan arrived at 5:39
• The Committee heard from one speaker in the audience. 146 of 334

8. FUTURE AGENDAS

9. ADJOURNMENT @ 7:24 PM
• Motion: Member Povilaitis
• Second: Member Miller
147 of 334

CITY OF GLENDALE

SPECIAL MEETING CHARTER

REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
August 7, 2025, at 5:00 PM

ROLL CALL
• T
he meeting was called to order on August 7, 2025 at 5:00 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Garibyan (arrived at 5:46), Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Meek, Miller,
Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo

Absent: None
Report of Recording Secretary, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the August 7, 2025, SPECIAL MEETING of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on August 6, 2025, before 5:00pm, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• The Committee heard from one caller and three speakers in the audience.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Meek
• Second: Committee Member Miller
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: Garibyan (arrived at 5:46)
Abstain: None

3. Continue
d Discussion of Directly Elected Mayor and Council Districts a. Motion Making Recommendations to the City Council Regarding the Office of Mayor
• The Committee heard from two callers and four speakers in the audience.

Motion to approve a recommendation to City Council not to place on the ballot an amendment to the City Charter transitioning from an “at-large” method to elect members of the City Council to a “district-based” method of election, as well as, not placing on the ballot an amendment to the City Charter establishing the office of Mayor separately elected from members of the City Council: Committee Member Karapetian
• Second: Comm ittee Member Miller
148 of 334

Ayes: Durham, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian,
Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis
Noes: Garibyan, Meek, Smith, Yoo, Flower

Absent: None
Abstain: None

4. Review of Pr
oposed Charter Language Regarding Councilmember
Compensation
• The Committee heard from two callers and two speakers in the audience. • Motion to bring back language for the City Charter requiring City Council to take on a discussion of Council salary once every two years: Committee Member Karapetian.
• Second: Committee Member Meek
• Motion to Amend to add language that the minimum salary be raised to the maximum for Council Members: Committee Member Garibyan. • Second for Motion to Amend: Committee Member Megerdichian. • The voice vote/by show of hands on the motion to amend failed. • Vote on the main motion:

Ayes: Durham, Flower, Garibyan, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Smith, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

5. FUTURE AG
ENDAS

9. ADJOURNME
NT @ 8:00 PM
• Motion: Committee Member Flower
• Second: Committee Member Meek
149 of 334

CITY OF

GLENDALE

CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Minutes
September 4, 2025, at 5:00 PM

1. ROLL
CALL
• The meeting was called to order on September 4, 2025 at 5:00 PM

Present: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Megerdichian (arrived at 5:20), Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Yoo

Absent: Garibyan, Smith

2. REGULAR BUSI

NESS AGENDA
a. Report of Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the September 4, 2025 Regular Meeting of the Charter Review Committee was Posted on August 29, 2025, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
• The Committee heard from four speakers in the audience.

4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Karapetian
• Second: Committee Member Manasserian
Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: Garibyan, Smith

5. STAFF CO
MMENTS

6. REPO

RTS - INFORMATION ONLY

7. BUSINES

S/DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Resolution Amending the Charter Review Committee’s Regular Meeting Schedule
• Resolution amending the Charter Review Committee meeting schedule to revise the meeting time 5:00pm to 5:30pm.
• Motion to approve: Committee Member Karapetian
• Second: Committee Member Povilaitis
• Resoluti
on Vote:

DRAFT
150 of 334

Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: Garibyan, Smith
• The Resolution is adopted.
b. Review of Proposed Charter Language Regarding Councilmember Compensation
• Motion by Committee Member Karapetian to approve a recommended revision to the City Charter
amending Article IV, section 3, by inserting the following language between
the second and third sentences: “No later than one year following each general
municipal election, and no less frequently than once every two years, the
council shall determine at a public meeting whether and the extent to which compensation for c
ouncil members shall be changed in accordance with
the Government Code.

Any such determination shall be supported with written
findings setting forth the basis for the decision, i ncluding any reasons for maintaining the current com
pensation.”
• Second: Committee Member
Megerdichian
o Motion to Amend by Committee Member Povilaitis that the inserted language read
as follows: “No later than one year following each general municipal election, and no less frequently than once every two years, the council shall determine at a public meeting whether and the extent to which compensation for counc
il members shall be changed in accordance
with the Government
Code, provided that it not exceed the Area Median
Income in Los
Angeles County for a household size of four persons. Any such determination shall be supported with written findings setting forth the basis
for the decision, including any reasons for maintaining the current compensation.” Second: Committee Member K arapetian o Motion to Amend Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Povilaitis Noes: Flower, Harutyunyan, Megerdichian, Miller, Yoo

Absent: Garibyan, Smith
o The Motion to Amend fails.
• Main Moti
on Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Manasserian, Meek, Megerdichian, Povilaitis
Noes: Miller, Yoo

Absent: Garibyan, Smith
• The Main Motion passes.
• Committ
ee Member Manasserian leaves the meeting at 6:56 pm.
c. Continued Di
scussion of Directly Elected Mayor and Council Districts DRAFT
151 of 334

1. Motion Making Recommendations to the City Council Regarding City Council Size

2. Motion Making Recommendations to the City Council Regarding the Office of Mayor
• Motion by Committee Member Karapetian:

Whereas the Charter Review Committee of the City of Glendale, 2024 to 2026, over 5 meetings, has extensively conferred and deliberately on the matters of transitioning Council Members, method of election from at-large to district-based, expanding the size of council, and providing for a directly elected mayor rather than council-selected mayor. And whereas the Committee has completed deliberations on these matters, fulfilling its charge from the Council. And whereas the discussion of these matters is being continued on Agenda Item 7.c., and that the motions presented in Item 7.c. are substantively consistent with motions presented by City Staff to this Committee on April 3, 2025. And whereas these motions failed by a Committee vote on April 3, 2025, and when reintroduced on August 7, 2025, did not advance to a vote with the committee concluding it is not in the best interest of the City to transition from an at-large to a district-based method of electing city councilmembers, not establish the office of mayor separately elected from members of the city council. And whereas by at 7 to 5 vote on August 7, 2025, the Committee recommended that the City not place on the ballot an amendment to the City Charter transitioning from an at-large method of election, nor an amendment to the City Charter establishing an Office of Mayor separately elected from members of the City Council. And where a continued discussion of these settled matters would impede the Committee’s obligation under City Council Resolution 2437 to revise the City Charter and address other matters, including the Civil Service system, an elected City Attorney, and appointed City Treasurer, therefore I move to indefinitely postpone Item 7.c. and related motions.
• Second: Committee Member Harutyunuan
• Motion Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Povilaitis
Noes: Flower, Meek, Megerdichian, Miller, Yoo

Absent: Garibyan, Manasserian, Smith
• The Motion fails.
• Motion by C
ommittee Member Povilaitis to table Item 7.c.
• Second: Committee Member Karapetian
• Motion Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Meek,
Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: Garibyan, Manasserian, Smith
• The Motion passes.
d. Discussi
on of Directly Elected City Attorney and Appointed City Treasurer DRAFT
152 of 334

• Motion by Committee Member Meek to continue Item 7.d. to the next meeting. • Second: Committee Member Durham
• Motion Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Meek,
Megerdichian, Povilaitis, Yoo
Noes: Miller

Absent: Garibyan, Manasserian, Smith
• The Motion Passes
• Motion by Com
mittee Member Karapetian to reconsider the prior Motion • Second: Committee Member Meek
• Motion Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Flower, Harutyunyan, Karapetian, Meek,
Megerdichian, Miller, Povilaitis, Yoo
Noes: None

Absent: Garibyan, Manasserian, Smith
• The Motion Passes.
• Committ
ee Member Megerdichian leaves at 8:12 pm.
• Motion by Com
mittee Member Miller to revisit Item 7.d., directly elected City Attorney and appointed City Treasurer, at the completion of discussion on Civil Service System.
• Second: Committee Member Meek
• Motion Vote:

Ayes: Durham, Harutyunyan, Meek, Miller, Povilaitis, Yoo Noes: Flower, Karapetian

Absent: Garibyan, Manasserian, Megerdichian, Smith
• The Motion passes.
e. Introd
uction to the Civil Service System

8. FUTURE AGENDAS
• Introduction to the Civil Service System continued
• Civil Service protections and whistleblower protections • Item 7.d.

9. ADJOURNMENT @ 9:05 PM
• Motion: Member Karapetian
• Second: Member Povilaitis
DRAFT
153 of 334

10a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Public Hearing Regarding Request for Approval of a Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, Pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law, to Construct a New 43-unit Residential Housing Development Project, Located at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Providing a Total of Nine Affordable Units, Including a Total of Six Reserved for Very Low Income Households and Three Reserved for Moderate Income Households (Density Bonus Housing Plan Case No. PDBP-003898-2024).

1. Motion to approve Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan

2. Motion to deny Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for September 30, 2025 Calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project involves the demolition of two existing residential buildings containing a total of eight dwelling units and carports, and the construction of a new 43-unit multi-family density bonus housing development totaling approximately 37,898 square feet (SF) with 29 residential parking spaces within one level of semi-subterranean parking; the project will provide nine affordable units (50% of the base density) with six units reserved for very low income households and three for moderate income households (“Project”). The Project qualifies for reduced parking inclusive of guest and handicapped spaces, under California Government Code Sections 65915, et seq. (“State Density Bonus Law”) and Glendale Municipal Code (“GMC”) Chapter 30.36.

The applicant is seeking approval of a Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan with a request for a 138.9% total density bonus (of which 100% is automatic (by right) and 38.9% is discretionary). The applicant is restricting more than 15% of the units as rentals for very low income households (33% of the units) and an additional 17% of the units as rentals for moderate-income households (second/stacked density bonus). This stacked bonus gives the Project an automatic 100% density bonus 154 of 334

210a
6 2
8 5
(50% bonus for the provision of at least 15% very low income restricted units, and an additional 50% bonus for the provision of at least 15% moderate income restricted units).

The applicant is requesting a greater bonus than the 100% density bonus the Project is automatically allowed under State Density Bonus Law. This discretionary request is subject to City Council approval following a public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to the number or type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility.

Staff recommends that Council approve the discretionary bonus request. The development is compatible with the neighborhood and will provide a wide variety of housing opportunities for renters across many income categories (50% market-rate housing, 33% affordable to very low income households and 17% affordable to moderate income households). The Project will also increase overall housing supply and help the City meet the goals of the recently adopted Housing Element of the General Plan. The proposed residential housing development with the affordable units for very low income households and moderate income households is consistent with Goal 3 of the Housing Element, to increase opportunities for affordable housing by continuing density bonus programs meant to encourage the private development of affordable housing. Moreover, both Project parcels are listed in the Housing Element’s Site Inventory, each designated for a total of four above moderate-income units, resulting in a combined total of eight above moderate-income units. The Project exceeds the affordability assumptions set forth in the Housing Element for the site by 26 above moderate-income units, six very low income units, and three moderate income units, resulting in a surplus of units for the site.

Furthermore, pursuant to State Density Bonus Law, the Project is entitled to 4 incentives, because it is restricting at least 16% of the units to very low income households, and unlimited waivers, subject to meeting certain findings. The Project is requesting four incentives and five waivers; staff recommends approval of all incentives and waivers requested because the findings for each can be made.

RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve the Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan application, after review and consideration of the associated environmental review.

ANALYSIS
This is a Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan with a request for a 138.9% total density bonus (38.9% is discretionary), as well as 4 concessions and 5 waivers, pursuant to State Density Bonus Law and GMC Chapter

30.36. 155 of 334

310a
6 2
8 5
General Information:

Applicant:BOLADarck Design
c/o Jean-Pierre Boladian
408 S. Pasadena Avenue #6
Pasadena, CA 91105
Property Owner:441- 445 Glen Investment, LLC
c/o Arax Asadorian
9526 Via Salerno
Burbank, CA 91504
Location/APN:441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202 APNs: 5636-004-022 and 5636-004-023
Legal Description:Lots 5 and 6, Tract No. 5451
Zone:R-1250 (High Density Residential)
Land Use Element:High Density Residential
Site Description:

The project address is 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd. located less than one mile northwest of Downtown Glendale (“Project Site”). The Project Site is located within the R-1250 zone and has a High Density General Plan designation. The Project Site is located mid-block, approximately 17,101 square feet (SF) in size and is currently improved with a total of eight residential dwelling units spread across two relatively flat lots. The Project Site is bordered by multi-family residential development directly to the north, east and west, and commercial development across the street to the south.

Surrounding Uses/Zoning:

Zoning Existing Uses
North R-1250 (High Density) Residential
Multi-family residential

South C2-II (Community Commercial) Commercial (Medical) Office East R-1250 (High Density) Residential Multi-family residential West R-1250 (High Density) Residential Multi-family residential Project Site R-1250 (High Density) Residential Multi-family residential 156 of 334

410a
6 2
8 5
Utilities and Public Services:

All municipal and private utilities are in place serving the neighborhood and other public services are currently provided in the vicinity.

Project Description:

The Project involves the demolition of eight existing residential dwelling units on site and the construction of a new, four-story, 47-foot high, 43-unit multi-family residential project totaling approximately 37,898 SF with a total of 29 residential parking spaces within one level of semi-subterranean parking. The Project will provide a total of nine affordable units, including six reserved for very low income households and three reserved for moderate income households. The Project will require future Design Review Board approval.

Overview of Density Bonus Request:

The applicant is seeking approval of a Density Bonus Housing Plan with a request for a density bonus, as well as four concessions and five waivers, pursuant to State Density Bonus Law, which allows developers who provide at least 15% of the units in a housing development to very low income households a mandatory 50% density bonus, as well an additional 50% bonus if they provide an additional 15% of the units in a housing development to moderate income households. Housing developments that agree to restrict at least 16% of the base density rental units to very low income households are entitled to request 4 incentives.

The Density Bonus Housing Plan meets the requirements of State Density Bonus Law because the Project is providing 33% of the total base density units as affordable to very low income households (giving the Project a 50% automatic density bonus), and an additional 17% of the total base density units as affordable to moderate income households (giving the Project an additional automatic 50% density bonus). Since the applicant’s request is for a 138.9% density bonus, (greater than the State Density Bonus Law mandatory maximum of 100%) this additional discretionary density bonus request must be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. GMC § 30.36.060(D)1. 1 GMC Section 30.36.060 requires any discretionary bonus over 35% to be heard and decided by the City Council because prior to recent amendments, the State Density Bonus Law’s previous maximum by right bonus was capped at 35% but is now capped at 100%. Though the amount a project is entitled to as an automatic bonus is controlled by State Density Bonus Law, this section of the GMC still applies with respect to the process that a discretionary bonus request must follow. 157 of 334

510a
6 2
8 5
The applicant is entitled to, and is requesting 4 incentives as follows:

1. Increase the maximum height and stories: Under GMC Section 30.11.030, Table

30.11-B, the maximum allowed height is 3 stories and 36 feet. The project proposes to increase the maximum allowed number of stories to 4 and the overall building height to 47 (11-foot height increase) measured to the top of the elevator shaft.

2. Increase maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR): In accordance with GMC Section 30.11.030, Table 30.11-B, the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) for multi-family projects in the R-1250 zone is 1.2 (maximum 20,521 square feet for the subject project). The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable floor area ratio. As proposed, the project features a total FAR of 2.21 (approx. 37,898 square feet), exceeding the maximum allowable FAR by 1.0 (approx.17,377 square feet).

3. Reduce common outdoor space: Pursuant to GMC Section 30.11.050(C), the Project is required to provide a minimum common outdoor space of 200 square feet per dwelling unit for the first 25 dwelling units on a lot and a minimum of 150 square feet for the second 25 dwelling units (7,700 square feet total required). The applicant is requesting to reduce the required common outdoor space by 3,490 square feet. As proposed, the Project provides approximately 4,210 square feet of common open space.

4. Not provide additional open space: Per GMC Section 30.31.020(A)(7), a minimum 900 square feet of additional open space for lots greater than 90 feet in width that exceed density plus an additional 20 square feet for each foot of lot width thereafter is required (the Project is required to provide 980 square feet). As proposed, the Project will not provide the additional open space for additional density gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet.

The applicant may not request additional incentives. However, the applicant may request unlimited waivers. In this case, the applicant is requesting 5 waivers of development standards as follows:

1. Decrease the minimum unit size: Pursuant to GMC Section 30.11.050(A)(1), a minimum 600 square feet is required for efficiency and one bedroom residential dwellings units. The applicant is requesting to reduce the minimum of 600 square- foot unit size to a minimum of 500 square feet for several studios and one-bedroom units.
158 of 334

610a
6 2
8 5

2. Increase the maximum allowed lot coverage: Pursuant to GMC Section 30.11.030, Table 30.11-B, the maximum allowed lot coverage for multi-family projects in the R-1250 zone is 50 percent (maximum 8,550 square feet). The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable lot coverage. As proposed, the Project features a total lot coverage of 9,141 square feet (53.45 percent), exceeding the maximum allowable lot coverage by 3.45 percent (approx. 591 square feet).

3. Decrease minimum and average interior setback on the east side per GMC Section

30.11.030, Table 30.11-B:
a. Second residential floor: minimum 5’-6” and 9’-9” average (east side) where the required minimum is 8’-0” and 11’-0” average;
b. Third residential floor: minimum 5’-6” and 9’-9” average (east side) where the required minimum is 11’-0” and 14’-0” average;
c. Fourth residential floor: minimum 9’-9” (east side) where the required minimum is 11’-0”.

4. Decrease minimum and average interior setback on the west side per GMC Section 30.11.030, Table 30.11 B:
a. Second residential floor: minimum 7’-9” (required minimum 8’-0”); b. Third residential floor: minimum 7’-9” (required minimum 11’-0”).

5. Reduce minimum permanently required landscaped open space: Pursuant to GMC Section 30.11.020, Table 30.11-B, the minimum required landscaped open space is 25 percent (4,275.2 square feet). The applicant is requesting to reduce the minimum required landscaped open space. As proposed, the project features a total landscaped open space of 1,780 square feet (approx. 10.4 percent), reducing the minimum requirement by approximately 2,495 square feet.

Incentive Findings Can Be Made:

Pursuant to State Density Bonus Law and GMC Section 30.36.080(A), when an applicant for a density bonus requests incentives, the approving body, here the City Council, shall grant the requested incentives unless written findings are made, based upon substantial evidence, of any one or more of the following:

1. The incentive or concession does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents.

2. The incentive or concession would have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government 159 of 334

710a
6 2
8 5
Code section 65589.5, or the physical environment or any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactory mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households. As used herein, “specific adverse impact upon public health or safety” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. Inconsistency with the Zoning ordinance or the land use designation in the General Plan shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact upon public health or safety.

3. The incentive or concession will be contrary to the state or federal law. The granting of an incentive or concession shall not require or be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a General Plan amendment, zoning change, study or other discretionary approval. For purposes of this subdivision, “study” does not include reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for the concession or incentive or to demonstrate that the incentive or concession meets the definition.

As outlined above, the applicant is seeking approval of 4 concessions pursuant to State Density Bonus Law and GMC Chapter 30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives), as follows:
(1) Increase the maximum allowed building height and stories; (2) Increase the maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR); (3) Reduce common open space; and
(4) Not provide the minimum required additional open space for additional density gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet wide.

Incentives Findings
When an applicant for a density bonus requests incentives or concessions, the Council shall grant the requested incentives or concessions, unless it makes written findings, based upon substantial evidence, of any one (1) or more of the following three findings:

1.The incentives must be granted unless Council finds, based on substantial evidence, that the incentives do not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents.

This denial finding cannot be made, as there is no evidence that the incentives will not result in actual cost reductions to provide for affordable rents. To the contrary, there is substantial evidence that the incentives will result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide affordable rents. The requested incentives, taken as a whole, are required to allow for the additional density requested to be constructed on the same amount of lot area. The incentives (height/stories, increase in FAR and reduction of required open 160 of 334

810a
6 2
8 5
space) will reduce costs to the applicant for providing affordable units by creating construction efficiencies, inherent reductions in costs, and allowing the construction of a greater number of units. The additional units will result in actual and identifiable cost reductions because the additional units will take advantage of construction efficiencies when being built and will generate rental income to offset the cost of providing the units at an affordable rent. If the Project were to comply with the Zoning Code regulations associated with maximum allowed building height/number of stories, floor area ratio, minimum required common outdoor space, and minimum required additional open space gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet wide, the footprint of the new building would be significantly impacted, and would subsequently affect the viability of the Project at the desired density and the proposed development build-out. With the requested concessions, the owner/applicant will realize cost reductions (due mainly to the construction of additional units that will generate rental revenue) that will allow it to provide the 9 housing units at an affordable rent.

2.The concessions (incentives) must be granted unless the Council finds, based on substantial evidence, that they will have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, or the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households. Specific, adverse impact is defined as “a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.” (Government Code section 65589.5(d)(2). Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or the land use designation in the General Plan shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact upon public health safety.

This denial finding cannot be made as there is no evidence that the incentives will have any adverse impacts. To the contrary, no specific adverse impacts upon public health or safety or on the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources would occur by granting the requested incentives for increased number of stories and building height, increased floor area ratio, reduce minimum required common outdoor space, and not to provide additional outdoor space gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet wide.

The Project Site has not been listed on the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, or Glendale Register of Historic Resources, and has not 161 of 334

910a
6 2
8 5
been identified as a historic resource in any survey. Moreover, an individualized analysis by Planning staff was conducted and staff concluded there is no evidence the Project Site or the structure on the Project Site are historic. (See Class 32 Infill Exemption Analysis, Exhibit 6).

Moreover, the incentives do not include or necessitate reductions in standards to any state or local Building and Safety Division, Fire department or Engineering Division requirements or any other objective, identifiable written requirements pertaining to health and safety. The existing residential buildings on the Project Site which are proposed to be demolished, are not historically or culturally significant. Therefore, demolition of the existing buildings would not be considered a significant impact. Moreover, the proposed project is exempt from further CEQA review because it meets the requirements to qualify for a Class 32 “In-fill Development Project” and thus, does not exceed thresholds for noise, traffic, air quality and water and will not result in significant cumulative impacts.

Furthermore, while some interior setbacks along the east and west side of the building are proposed to be reduced (requested as a waiver), the provided setbacks provide adequate light, air and ventilation for adjacent buildings, which consist of similar multi- family residential buildings to the north, east and west of the Project Site.

Furthermore, the incentives allow for additional buildable area on the Project Site, which will then accommodate additional dwelling units. The additional density will, in fact, promote the City’s health and safety in that there will be greater housing opportunities for low income and moderate income households. Moreover, the project will advance the goals and policies of the General Plan, Housing Element (2021-2029), including, but not limited to, Goal 1 (“A City with a Wide Range of Housing Types to Meet the Needs of Current and Future Residents), Goal 3 (“A City with Increased Opportunities for Affordable and Special Needs Housing Development) Housing Services that Address Groups with Special Housing Needs) and Policies 3.1 and 3.2 (“Encourage both the private and public sectors to produce or assist in the production of affordable housing for special needs groups such as: persons with disabilities, the elderly, large families, single- parent households, and formerly homeless) and (“Promote the development of extremely low, very low, low and moderate income housing by allowing developers density bonuses or other financial incentives for providing units for low and moderate income residents.

The unit mix and location of affordable housing units in density bonus projects must be approved by the City and included in an affordable housing agreement.”). Accordingly, this denial finding cannot be met.

3.The concessions (incentives) must be granted unless the Council finds, based on substantial evidence, that the concessions will be contrary to state or federal law.
162 of 334

1010a
6 2
8 5
The requested incentives will not be contrary to state or federal law and do not require any other discretionary entitlement other than Design Review Board review and approval.

The Project is designed to comply with Building and Safety codes and the proposed 43- unit affordable housing residential project is consistent with the General Plan. The Project meets the goals and policies in the Housing Element to provide affordable housing. There is no evidence of state or federal laws being violated. Accordingly, this denial finding cannot be met.

Since there is no substantial evidence to support any of the three findings for denial, the Council must grant the requested incentives.

Waiver Findings Can Be Made:

Per State Density Bonus Law and GMC Sections 30.36.040 and 30.36.080(B), an applicant may request waivers or reductions in development standards in addition to the incentives requested. Under this provision, the applicant is requesting 5 waivers:
(1) Decrease the minimum unit size: Per GMC Section 30.11.050 A 1., a minimum 600 square feet is required for efficiency and 1 bedroom residential dwellings units.

The applicant is requesting to reduce the minimum of 600 square feet unit size to 500 square feet for serval studios and 1 bedroom units.

(2) Increase the maximum allowed lot coverage: Pursuant to GMC Section 30.11.030, Table 30.11-B, the maximum allowed lot coverage for multi-family projects in the R-1250 zone is 50 percent (maximum 8,550 square feet). The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum allowable lot coverage. As proposed, the Project features a total lot coverage of 9,141 square feet (53.45 percent), exceeding the maximum allowable lot coverage by 3.45 percent (approx. 591 square feet).
(3) Decrease minimum and average interior setback on east side per GMC Section

30.11.030 Table 30.11-B:
a. Second residential floor: minimum 5’-6” and 9’-9” average (east side) where the required minimum is 8’-0” and 11’-0” average;
b. Third residential floor: minimum 5’-6” and 9’-9” average (east side) where the required minimum is 11’-0” and 14’-0” average;
c. Fourth residential floor: minimum 9’-9” (east side) where the required minimum is 11’-0”.
(4) Decrease minimum and average interior setback on the west side per GMC Section 30.11.030 Table 30.11 B:
a. Second residential floor: minimum 7’-9” (required minimum 8’-0”); 163 of 334

1110a
6 2
8 5
b. Third residential floor: minimum 7’-9” (required minimum 11’-0”). (5) Reduce minimum permanently required landscaped open space: Pursuant to GMC Section 30.11.020, Table 30.11-B, the minimum required landscaped open space is 25 percent (4,275.2 square feet). The applicant is requesting to reduce the minimum required landscaped open space. As proposed, the Project features a total landscaped open space of 1,780 square feet (10.4 percent), reducing the minimum requirement by approximately 2,495 square feet.

The City Council shall grant the request for waivers or reductions in development standards pursuant to this section only if all of the following written findings are made:

1. The application of said development standard(s) will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the housing development at the density and with the incentives or concessions granted pursuant to this chapter;

2. The waiver or reduction in development standards will not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;

3. The waiver or reduction in development standards will not have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; and

4. The waiver or reduction in development standards will not be contrary to state or federal law.

Waiver Findings
All of the required findings can be made in support of the requested waivers, as described below.

The application of the development standards without the granted waivers will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the housing development at the density and with the incentives granted pursuant to GMC Chapter 30.36. The requested waivers are required to allow provision of a larger building footprint. 164 of 334

1210a
6 2
8 5
Minimum Unit Size: Approval of a waiver, allowing a reduction in minimum unit size as regulated by GMC Section 30.11.050(A), would allow the Project to be physically feasible. The Project is designed to optimize density to provide 9 units affordable to very low income and moderate income households and provide for a balanced unit mix to serve a variety of income levels. The requested waiver to reduce the minimum 600 square feet unit size to 500 square feet for one-bedroom units is necessary to allow for the construction of the additional density and affordable units, as well as maximizing the unit mix that is physically possible to build. The waiver will allow relief to provide affordable units and a more balanced unit mix consisting of studios and one-bedroom units.

Increase in Lot Coverage: The applicant is requesting to increase the lot coverage to

53.45%, where 50% is the maximum lot coverage allowed in the R-1250 zone (GMC Section 30.11.030, Table 30.11-B). As proposed, the project features a total lot coverage of approximately 9,141 SF, exceeding the maximum allowable lot coverage of 8,550 SF by 3.45 percent (592 SF). The project is designed to optimize density to provide 9 units affordable to very low-income and moderate-income households and provide for a balanced unit mix to serve a variety of income levels. The requested waiver from the maximum 50% lot coverage is needed to allow for the construction of the additional density and affordable units. Also, the requested waiver will allow for the creation of more studios and one-bedroom dwelling units affordable to both very low income and moderate income households versus the creation of less and smaller studio and one bedroom units. According to the Project Plans (Exhibit 2), on sheet T-1.0 it shows the following unit mix: 19 studio units and 24 one-bedroom units (total 15,239.6 SF). Additionally, the project features approximately 11,524 SF of underground parking.

As designed, complying with the maximum 50% lot coverage would physically preclude the Project’s proposed design and garage and floor plan layout. The increase in lot coverage enables a greater capacity of the Project Site to be developed with the 43 multi-family dwelling units, including 9 affordable units. To comply with Code, the applicant would need to reduce the overall building footprint by approximately 592 SF which would physically preclude the construction of housing with the 9 affordable units and balanced unit mix at the density and with the incentives. Therefore, the requested waiver to exceed the maximum allowed lot coverage is needed to physically allow the density and unit mix to be built
Reduction in interior setback on East and West side: To ensure the Project is physically feasible, the applicant is requesting a waiver from the interior setback requirements outlined in GMC Section 30.11.030, Table 30.11-B. This waiver is necessary to avoid physical constraints that could hinder the successful implementation of the development. The Project is designed to optimize density to provide 9 units affordable to very low-income and moderate-income households and provide for a balanced unit 165 of 334

1310a
6 2
8 5
mix to serve a variety of income levels. The requested waiver from the minimum and average interior setback requirements is needed to allow for the construction of the additional density and affordable units. The overall Project massing complies with the allowable zoning standards and massing, except for a few instances where the building mass extends slightly beyond the prescribed setback limits. These instances are minimal and are a result of design considerations aimed at enhancing the functional layout of the building and optimizing the use of available space.

The Project is designed to optimize density with a balanced unit mix consisting of studio and one-bedroom unit apartments within the proposed density of 43 units (with the density bonus). The requested waiver to reduce the required minimum interior and average setback along the east and west sides of the building is necessary to make this balanced unit mix physically possible to build with the proposed density. The requested waiver is to decrease the minimum and average interior setback on the east side to provide a minimum 5’-6” and 9’-9” average on the second floor where the minimum required is 8’-0” and 11’-0” average, a minimum 5’-6” and 9’-9” average on the third floor where the minimum required is 11’-0” and 14’-0” average, a minimum 9’-9” setback on the fourth floor where the minimum required is minimum 11’-0”, and to decrease the minimum and average interior setback on the west side to provide a minimum 7’-9” on the second floor where the minimum required is 8’-0” and a minimum 7’-9” on the third floor where the minimum required is 11’-0”. This waiver for interior setbacks is necessary to accommodate the proposed floor area. If the Project were to comply with the required interior setback requirements, it would result in smaller residential units with fewer total bedrooms. Without the requested waiver, the Project density would be reduced, the number of affordable units reduced, and the balanced unit mix would be affected, which would make it physically impossible to build the Project at the allowable density with the desired unit mix and number of affordable units and with incentives.

Reduction in required permanent landscaped open space: Providing the minimum required permanent landscaped open space of 25% (4,275 SF) of the total lot area will effectively preclude the construction of the housing development at the proposed density. By providing the required 25% landscaped open space for the project, the available land area for construction will be significantly diminished. As proposed, the Project features 1,780 SF (10.4%) total landscape for the entire Site. Without the requested waiver to reduce the minimum required landscaping, the Project density would be reduced, the number of affordable units reduced, and the balanced unit mix would be affected, which would make it physically impossible to build the Project at the allowable density with the desired unit mix and number of affordable units. This constraint could prevent the Project from achieving the planned number of housing units, as the development would not have sufficient space to accommodate the 43 166 of 334

1410a
6 2
8 5
proposed residential units if they were to comply with the minimum 25% landscape requirement.

The requested deviations described above allow for all 43 units with 9 on-site affordable units, underground parking, amenities and open spaces shown on the proposed Project plans. Without the requested reduction in unit size, additional lot coverage, reduced interior setbacks on the building’s east and west sides, and reduction from the minimum required landscaped open space, the size of the units would be reduced further than what is currently requested through an incentive, and the proposed density would be reduced. Simply put, the waivers requested will provide the necessary building square footage and unit count to allow for the desired Project size, the desired Project unit-mix, and the desired Project amenities to bring this Project to fruition as envisioned with the density and requested incentives allowed under the State Density Bonus Law. To state the converse, denying the 5 requested waivers will physically preclude the Project from being built per the desired unit mix, number of bedrooms, net livable area and average unit size, and with the density permitted under the State Density Bonus Law.

2.The waiver or reduction in development standards will not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact.

The granting of the waivers will not have a specific adverse impact upon public health or safety or on the physical environment. The project is exempt from further CEQA review as a Class 32- “In-fill Development Projects” exemption, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15332, because the Project meets all the conditions for an in-fill development project. These waivers do not rise to the level of a specific, adverse impact under the law, which requires a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions. Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan land use designation shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. The proposed waivers requested do not include waivers for Building and Safety, Fire Department or other requirements pertaining to health or safety. The proposed lot coverage, interior setback (east/west side), and landscape open space will allow additional density to accommodate a growing population, improving the City’s public health and safety by establishing greater opportunities for residents to age within their community, as well as providing greater opportunities for both low- and moderate- income family households. Further, as the Project is exempt from further CEQA review as a Class 32 “In-Fill Development Project,” it does not exceed thresholds identified for 167 of 334

1510a
6 2
8 5
environmental impacts including noise, traffic, and air quality and will not result in significant cumulative impacts.

The waivers or reductions in development standards will not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact. The Project is exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act and no significant environmental impacts have been identified. The Project is designed to comply with the various sections of the Glendale Municipal Code as administered by different City Departments (e.g. Fire, Glendale Water & Power, Public Works, Building & Safety, etc.). Aside from the 4 incentive and 5 waiver requests, the Project otherwise fully complies with the Zoning Code. Further, the provision of additional housing and affordable housing benefits the public health and safety and is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element goals of providing a wide range of housing types including affordable housing.

The Project’s impact in terms of reduced unit size, increased lot coverage, reduced interior setback (east/west side) and landscaped open space is mitigated by certain factors. For example, the building uses several design techniques that reduce the apparent massing and scale of the building, including a variation in building form and façade, and a variety of exterior finish materials that help break up the apparent building size.

3. The waiver or reduction in development standards will not have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources.

The waivers or reductions in development standards will not have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. The existing 8 residential dwelling units spread across two lots and garage on the Site, which are proposed to be demolished, have not been identified as being historically or culturally significant and the Project does not impact any real property listed on the California or Glendale Register of Historical Resources.

4. The waiver or reduction in development standards will not be contrary to state or federal law.

The waivers or reductions in development standards will not be contrary to state or federal law and do not require any other discretionary entitlement other than design review approval. The project complies with State Density Bonus Law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the City’s Density Bonus Ordinance, and is 168 of 334

1610a
6 2
8 5
designed to comply with the various sections of the Glendale Municipal Code as administered by City Departments (e.g. Fire, Glendale Water & Power, Public Works, Building & Safety, etc.). No other known federal or state laws would be in conflict with granting of the incentives/concessions.

Discretionary Density Bonus Findings Can Be Made:

The Project Site is located in the R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone where multiple residential dwelling units are a permitted use. In accordance with GMC Section

30.11.020, sites zoned R-1250 with more than 90 feet of frontage are permitted 1 unit per 1,000 square feet, which permits a maximum residential density of 43 units per acre. The project is approximately 17,101 in size, with a lot width of approximately 94 feet. By right, the applicant is entitled to a base density of 18 units (17,101/1,000 = 17.10 rounded up to 18 – CA Govt Code § 65915(q) requires all density bonus calculations to be rounded up).

The applicant is requesting a 138.9% density bonus in order to provide a total of 43 residential units (18 unit base density x 100% density bonus= 36 units; and an additional

38.9% density bonus allows an additional 7 units (36 +7 additional units=43 units)). The applicant is automatically entitled to 100% density bonus by providing a minimum of 15% very low and 15% moderate income units, and is requesting an additional 38.9% as a discretionary bonus. In exchange for the discretionary request, the applicant is restricting 33% of the base units to very low income renter households, which represents an additional 18% more units affordable to very low income households than required State law. This represents a positive correlation and proportionality between the requested density bonus and the number of very low income units to be provided, and State Density Bonus Law allows the City to grant a discretionary density bonus above the maximum allowed by State Density Bonus Law, (CA Govt Code § 65915(n)). Per GMC Section

30.36.060(D), the grant of a density bonus above the state required mandatory (which was at one point 35% but is now at 100% due to the recent state law amendment allowing a stacked bonus) is subject to City Council approval following a public hearing. The council may approve or deny such a request at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. (GMC § 30.36.060(D)).

As set forth above, the applicant has provided a proportional amount of additional affordable units, commensurate with the amount of the discretionary density bonus, all to be restricted as rental units for very low income households. Staff believes the underlying zone and neighborhood conditions are such that the grant of the discretionary density would not be out of character and would be compatible with the existing surrounding multi- family residential uses in this R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone. The proposed 43- 169 of 334

1710a
6 2
8 5
unit residential housing Project will help the City by providing and allocating additional residential housing (both market rate and affordable) and help to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Both parcels (441 W. Glenoaks (APN 5636-004-023) and 445 W. Glenoaks (APN 5636-004-022)) are listed in the Housing Element’s Site Inventory, each designated for a total of 4 above moderate-income units, resulting in a combined total of 8 above moderate-income units. The Project exceeds the affordability assumptions specified in the Housing Element for the site by 26 above moderate-income units, 6 very low-income units, and 3 moderate-income units. Accordingly, all of the factors required to be considered in awarding a discretionary density bonus weigh in favor of approval, and staff recommends that the City Council approve the discretionary density bonus request.

The Project Exceeds Parking Required Under the Mandatory Parking Concession:

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915(p)(2)(A) and GMC Section

30.36.090(A), the applicant has also requested an automatic (mandatory) parking concession. Upon the request of an applicant, the required vehicular parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, is not to exceed one-half (0.5) space per bedroom of a development providing at least 11% very low income units located within

0.5 mile of a major transit stop with unobstructed access (collectively, the “Parking Concession). Unobstructed access means a resident is able to access the major transit stop without encountering natural or constructed impediments (e.g., freeways, rivers, mountains, and bodies of water, etc., but does not include residential structures, shopping centers, parking lots, or rails used for transit). The Project is located within 0.5 mile of a major transit stop with unobstructed access. The Project’s unit mix is 19 studio units and 24 one-bedroom units. Based on the number of units provided, the Parking Concession would require a minimum of 22 residential parking spaces (43 units x 0.5 = 21.5 rounded up to 22). The Project exceeds the minimum requirement per and proposes to provide 29 parking spaces total. Accordingly, the Project meets and exceeds the parking requirements under CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(2)(A) and is eligible for the automatic Parking Concession.

The Project Satisfies the Replacement Obligation Under State Density Bonus Law:

Per State Density Bonus Law an applicant is ineligible for a density bonus or any other incentives or concessions if a project is proposed on a parcel or parcels with rental dwelling units that have been vacated or demolished within a 5-year period preceding the project’s development application or have been occupied by lower or very low income households, unless the proposed project replaces those units. If any dwelling units are occupied on the date of a project’s development application, the proposed project is required to provide the same number of units of equivalent size (i.e., the same total number of bedrooms as the units being replaced) as affordable to the same or lower 170 of 334

1810a
6 2
8 5
income households in occupancy. If the incomes are unknown to the applicant, there is an established rebuttable presumption per HUD’s Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy database. Using the most recent data (2017-2021) for Extremely Low, Very Low, and Low Renter households on https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html and dividing the total households from those three categories (30,270 households) by the total renters within the City of Glendale (48,575 households), this presumption amounts to

62.32% (30,270 / 48,575 = 62.32%) of renter households at or below 80% AMI. Per the Los Angeles County Assessor, there are currently 8 residential dwelling units at 9 bedrooms total on parcels 5636-004-022 & 5636-004-023. The Project is subject to the

62.32% presumption set forth by HUD. By applying the rebuttable presumption of 62.32% to the 8 residential dwelling units and 9 bedrooms, 5 replacement units (62.32% x 8 =

4.99 rounded up to 5) at 6 bedrooms total (62.32% x 9 = 5.61 rounded up to 6) are required to be designated as affordable under State Density Bonus Law. The Project is required to provide 5 affordable units (with a total of 6 bedrooms) to very low income households.

The applicant proposes the following 9 affordable units, which will be finalized by Housing Division staff shortly after Project entitlements are granted:
Unit 102: 1 bedroom, at 611.8 SF (very-low);
Unit 106: Studio, at 550.1 SF (very-low);
Unit 107 Studio, at 505.5 SF (very-low);
Unit 203: 1 bedroom, at 598.1 SF (moderate);
Unit 208: Studio, at 550.1 SF (very-low);
Unit 209: Studio 604.7 SF; (moderate)
Unit 301: 1 bedroom, at 608.1 SF (moderate);
Unit 306: Studio, at 550.1 SF (very-low); and
Unit 307: Studio, at 505.5 SF (very-low)
As such, the applicant has met the replacement obligation, and no additional units are required.

The Project Satisfies the IZO and Commercial DIF Is Not Applicable:

Per GMC Chapter 30.35, the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (the “IZO”), requires a housing development (a rental development project of 8 or more dwelling units proposed to be constructed in the City) to provide 15% of the base density units as affordable to low income households. The Project is subject to the IZO and is required to provide three low income restricted units (15 percent of 18 base density units=2.7, rounded up to 3). The Project will meet the IZO requirement because the applicant will provide 6 units restricted to very low income households; no additional affordable units are required under the IZO. 171 of 334

1910a
6 2
8 5
Per GMC Chapter 4.11, the Affordable Housing Commercial Development Impact Fee is not applicable to the Project as it does not entail a permitted commercial component.

Recorded Density Bonus Housing Agreement Will Ensure Affordability for 55 Years:

The owner will be required to enter into a Density Bonus Housing Agreement (“DB Agreement”) in which the owner will covenant to restrict 6 units as rental units for very low income households and 3 units as rental units for moderate income households. The DB Agreement with the City will be a recorded restriction on the property on which the affordable units and density bonus are constructed. In addition, the DB Agreement will run with the land and bind all future owners and successors in interest for a period of 55 years.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the action recommended in this report, other than the additional property tax or other revenue that may be generated if the Project is approved and ultimately developed in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Director and Community Development Department staff have conducted environmental review for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and have determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental pursuant to section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines contained in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Class 32 “In-fill Development Projects” exemption) because the Project meets all of the conditions for an in-fill development project as follows, as analyzed in detail with supporting evidence and technical studies, in the attached Exhibit 6:
a) The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations;
b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban areas;
c) The Project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species;
d) Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and
e) The Project site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
172 of 334

2010a
6 2
8 5

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are set forth in the attached in Exhibit 7, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Deny the Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan, inclusive of the discretionary density bonus.

2. Any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Bradley Calvert, Director of Community Development
Prepared by:

Milca Toledo, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Yvette Neukian, Principal Assistant City Attorney
Erik Krause, Assistant Director of Community Development Vista Ezzati, Principal Planner
Aaron Brownell, Senior Housing Project Manager
Samuel Safaryan, Administrative Analyst
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Location Map
Exhibit 2: Project Plans
Exhibit 3: Draft Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Exhibit 4: Site and neighborhood Photos
Exhibit 5: Additional documentation provided by the Applicant Exhibit 6: Class 32 Infill Exemption Analysis
Exhibit 7: Campaign Disclosure Form
173 of 334

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ________________ and seconded by Council Member _________________, that upon review and consideration of Density Bonus, Discretionary Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan Case No. PDBP-003898-2024 (“Density Bonus Housing Plan Case”), located at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Boulevard, Glendale, CA 91202 (“Site”), and after having conducted a public hearing on said case pursuant to the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (“GMC”), and receiving testimony, the City Council of the City of Glendale, California, based upon all of the evidence in the record, hereby APPROVES the Density Bonus & Housing Plan Case for all of the reasons outlined in the September 30, 2025 staff report from the Director of Community Development, including any attachments thereto (“Report”) and any other evidence presented at the hearing, including any additional Council comments at the hearing, subject to the conditions below and pursuant to the facts and findings as follows:

The housing development project involves the demolition of 8 existing residential dwelling units on site and the construction of a new, 4-story, 47-foot high, 43-unit multi- family residential project totaling approximately 37,898 square feet with a total of 29 residential parking spaces within one level of semi-subterranean parking, and the provision of 9 affordable units (6 reserved for very low income households and 3 reserved for moderate income households) pursuant to State and City Density Bonus Law (“Project”).

The City Council has reviewed and considered analysis and evidence to support that the Project is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to section 15332 of the State CEQA 174 of 334

Guidelines contained in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“Class 32 In-fill Development Project”) and hereby approves such exemption, and finds that the Project meets all of the conditions of a Class 32 In-fill Development Project, as analyzed in detail with supporting evidence and technical studies contained in Exhibit 6 to the Report.

This approval is based on the authority provided in State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code (“Cal. Govt. Code”) §§ 65915, et seq.) and GMC Chapter

30.36 (Density Bonus Incentives), that allows an applicant that seeks and agrees to provide at least 15% of the units in a housing development to very low income households and at least 15% of the units in a housing development to moderate income households a mandatory 100% density bonus, as well as 4 incentives and unlimited waivers for providing at least 16% of the units to very low income households. In this case the applicant will be restricting 33% of the units as rentals to very low income households, as well as an additional 17% of the units as rentals to moderate income households (second or stacked density bonus) pursuant to Cal. Govt. Code Sections 65915(d)(2)(F) and 65915(v). State Density Bonus Law and the GMC also allow the City Council to grant or deny a discretionary density bonus above the mandatory 100 percent. California Government Code Section 65915(n) states that “[i]f permitted by local ordinance, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a city . . . from granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this section . . .”. Pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.060(D), an applicant may seek a density bonus in an amount greater than that required by State Density Bonus Law, which shall be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may 175 of 334

approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. The applicant is therefore eligible for the mandatory 100 percent density bonus, but has requested a 138.9% density bonus (of which 38.9% is discretionary, since 100% is mandatory), which will allow the density of the Project to equal 43 units.

Based on the above, the City Council hereby finds and determines that it has considered factors including, but not limited to, the number and type of units, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. The Council finds that the number of affordable units proposed (9, which represents 50% of the base density) is sufficient in number, in unit type, in unit mix and in unit location, in comparison to the total number of units requested. The Council further finds that the underlying zone and neighborhood conditions are such that the grant of the discretionary density would not be out of character and would be compatible with the existing surrounding multi-family residential uses in this R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone, as depicted in Exhibit 2 (Project Plans) and Exhibit 4 (Site and neighborhood photos) of the Report, and therefore, does support the requested discretionary density bonus. The Council also finds that the grant of the discretionary density bonus that would allow the Project to be built would provide certain public benefits that include, but are not limited to: 1) the provision of affordable housing (greater than the applicant is required to provide by law and in proportion to the added density being granted to the project); 2) the provision of affordable rental housing for not 176 of 334

only very low income households, but also, for moderate income households; and 3) the provision of market-rate housing; all of which will contribute to the City’s share of its Regional Houising Needs Allocation and provide needed affordable and market-rate housing to help alleviate the State-wide housing crisis, consistent with the City’s General Plan. These public benefits of the Project support the grant of the discretionary density bonus.

The Council additionally determines that it cannot make any of the findings to deny the incentives requested, and therefore, must grant the incentives, pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.080(A) because there is no evidence in the record that: (1) the incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents; (2) the incentive will have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, or the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low income and moderate income households; and (3) the incentive will be contrary to state or federal law. The Council hereby adopts and incorporates the incentive findings set forth in the Report.

The Council additionally determines that it can make the findings to grant the requested waivers, pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.080(B) because substantial evidence in the record supports that: (1) the application of the development standards sought to be waived will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the 177 of 334

housing development at the density and with the incentives granted: (2) the waivers will not have a “specific adverse impact,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code § 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact; (3) the waivers will not have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; and (4) the waivers will not be contrary to state or federal law. The Council hereby adopts and incorporate the waiver findings set forth in the Report.

APPROVAL of this Density Bonus shall be subject to the following conditions:

1. That the Project/housing development shall be in substantial accord with the plans submitted with the application and presented at the hearing except for any modifications as may be required to meet specific Code standards or other conditions stipulated herein to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

2. That all necessary permits shall be obtained from the Development Services division of the Community Development Department, and all construction shall be in compliance with the Glendale Building and Safety Code and all other applicable regulations.

3. That the premises shall be maintained in a clean and orderly condition, free of weeds, trash and graffiti, both during construction and at all times thereafter.

4. That any expansion or modification of the Project, facility, or use shall require a new Density Bonus application. Expansion shall constitute adding of additional units, floor area, or any physical change as determined by the Director of Community Development.
178 of 334

5. That the applicant shall work cooperatively and in good faith with the City’s Community Development Department and the City Attorney’s Office to make any permissible or required amendments to the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan and to execute and record a Density Bonus Housing Agreement pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.140, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his designee and subject to approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. Such Density Bonus Housing Agreement shall restrict the rental or sale of the required percentage of dwelling units in the Project/housing development to persons or families of very low income and moderate income households identified in this approval. The applicant shall record such Density Bonus Housing Agreement prior to issuance of any and all required building permits.

6. That all affordable units shall be reasonably dispersed throughout the Project Site (e.g. throughout the different floors) and shall be comparable with the other dwelling units in the Project in terms of appearance, finished quality and materials.

Subject to requested changes necessary to comply with health and safety standards approved by the Director of Community Development or his designee, the unit type, size and location of the affordable units shall be as approved by the City Council.

7. That the affordability term shall not start until the date of recordation of the Housing Notice of Completion. The applicant shall notify the City’s Housing Division at least six months prior to the anticipated date of the Certificate of Occupancy so that affordable units may be marketed in a timely manner.

8. That approval of the Design Review Board shall be obtained prior to applying for or obtaining permits.
179 of 334

9. That the premises shall be made available to any authorized City personnel (Fire, Police, Neighborhood Service, etc.) for inspection to ascertain that all conditions of approval of this Density Bonus application are complied with.

10. That the applicant shall comply with all Section/Department requirements as specified in their memos to the satisfaction of the City or Department Director.

These memos include but are not limited to Glendale Water and Power (May 15, 2025), Public Works Engineering (July 18, 2025), Traffic Engineering (May 1, 2025), and Maintenance Services/Urban Forester (May 14, 2025), Building and Safety Division (June 10, 2025), Community Development Housing Division (May 20, 2025) and Mobility Division (May 5, 2025), Community Services and Parking (May 7, 2025), Fire Prevention Engineering (May 16, 2025), and Long Rang Planning (May 13, 2025).

11. That if any buildings, sidewalks, curb or gutter, fence or landscaping areas, etc., adjacent to the site are damaged during the course of construction on public or private property, the damage shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works for public property.

12. That any proposed exterior lighting shall be directed on the driveways, walkways and parking areas within the development and away from adjacent properties and the public-right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development.

13. That the applicant and/or the owner of the Site and/or real property located at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd., and any of their successors and/or assigns (collectively, “Developer”) agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, and each of its agents, officers, council members, commissioners, attorneys, employees and 180 of 334

representatives, with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City, from any claim, action or proceeding brought against the City to attack, set aside, void or annul any City land use approval for the Project located at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202. At its sole discretion, the City may participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the Developer of any obligation imposed by this condition. The Developer’s indemnity, defense and hold harmless obligations shall include, without limitation, payment of all damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorney’s fees, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with such action or proceeding. In the event that a claim, action or proceeding referenced herein is brought, the City shall promptly notify the Developer of the existence of the claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of such claim, action or proceeding. As used herein, “land use approval” refers to decisions of the City approving requests for planning permits for the Project including, but not limited to, density bonus housing plans (including requests for density bonus, incentives and/or waivers), design review, general plan amendments, zone changes, zoning ordinance text amendments, tentative maps, vesting tentative maps, tentative parcel maps, reversions to acreage, final maps, final map modifications or amendments, time extensions, parcel map waivers, lot line adjustments, boundary line adjustments, certificates of compliance, conditional certificates of compliance, development agreements, conditional use permits, conditional use permit modifications, conditional use permit extensions, variances, variance modifications, precise plan of design, specific plans, sign permits, site plans, temporary use permits, any administrative or discretionary permit or any accompanying California Environmental Quality Act 181 of 334

determinations pertaining to the type of approval referred to in this section, and any other similar approval.

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
182 of 334

This denial is based on the authority provided in State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Sections 65915, et seq.) and the City’s Code, that allow the City Council to grant or deny a discretionary density bonus above 100 percent.

Government Code Section 65915(n) states that “[i]f permitted by local ordinance, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a city . . . from granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this section . . .” . Pursuant to GMC

30.36.060(D), an applicant may seek a density bonus in an amount greater than that required by State Density Bonus Law, which shall be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion, taking into consideration factors including, but not limited to: the number and type of affordable units proposed, the housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility.

Based on the above, the City Council hereby finds and determines that it has considered factors including, but not limited to, the number and type of units, the 183 of 334

housing type, the underlying zone, and neighborhood conditions and compatibility. The Council finds that the number of affordable units proposed is not sufficient in number, in unit type, in unit mix or in unit location, in comparison to the total number of units requested (with a request for a 138.9% total density bonus (of which 38.9% is discretionary), 18 units are allowed in the underlying zone but 25 bonus units are requested for a total of 43 units, of which 6 are restricted to very low income households and 3 are restricted to moderate income households) as set forth in detail in the September 30, 2025 Report to the Council from the Director of Community Development. The Council further finds that the underlying zone and neighborhood conditions and compatibility do not support the requested discretionary density bonus.

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
184 of 334

ZONING MAP
1" = 100'
10 - 17 - 2022
AVENUE
ARDEN

BOULEVARD

GLENOAKS

BOULEVARD
STREET
DRYDEN
STREET
DR
PALM

PACIFIC

AVENUERAFAEL
AVENUE

COLUMBUS
DRYDEN
C2 II
C2 II
C2 II
C2 II
C2 II
C2 II
C2 II
C2 II
C1
R 3050
C1R 3050 C1
R 1250
C1
R 1250
C2 II
R 1250
ZONE LINE:

LEGEND:

ZONING:

R 3050: MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
C1: NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
C2 II: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL HEIGHT DISTRICT II
R 1250: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OWNER:

ARAX NAZARIAN
APPLICANT:

JEAN-PIERRE BOLADIAN
REPRESENTATIVE:

BOLADARCK DESIGN
ATTN: FARNOOSH FARMER
(626) 381-9677
EXHIBIT 1
185 of 334

EXHIBIT 2
186 of 334

ROOFTOP VIEW - COMMON SPACE ON THE 4TH FLOOR.
187 of 334

OFFICE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT #5451, LOTS #7 & #8.

MAX. HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS:BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED:
* SEE A-1.1 & A-1.2 FOR SETBACK DIAGRAMS.

ALLOWED FAR: 1.2 MAX. STORIES ALLOWED: 3 MAX. STORIES PROPOSED: 4 PROPOSED FAR: 2.2 STUDIO UNIT 191 BEDROOM UNIT 24TOTAL UNITS 43=>C-1.0COVER SHEETC-1.2COVER SHEETT-1.0TITLE SHEETA-0.1GENERAL NOTES (GWP)A-0.2GENERAL NOTES (GWP)A-0.3GENERAL NOTESA-0.4GENERAL NOTESCS-1SURVEYD-1.0DEMOLITION PLANA-1.0SITE PLANA-1.1SETBACK DIAGRAMSA-1.2AREA DIAGRAMSA-1.3CALC DIAGRAMSA-2.0PARKING PLANA-2.1FIRST FLOOR PLANA-2.2SECOND FLOOR PLANA-2.3THIRD FLOOR PLANA-2.4FOURTH FLOOR PLANA-2.5ROOF PLANA-3.0ELEVATIONSA-3.1ELEVATIONSA-3.2MATERIAL BOARDA-4.0SECTIONSA-4.1SECTIONSA-5.0ENLARGED UNIT PLANSA-5.1ENLARGED UNIT PLANSA-5.2ENLARGED UNIT PLANSA-5.3ENLARGED UNIT PLANSAD-1DETIALSL-SERIESLANDSCAPE PLANSE-SERIESELECTRICAL PLANS PROVIDED:

TOTAL PROVIDED
MINIMUM PERMANENTLY LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE:
6,586.9 S.F.38.5% OF LOT AREA
COMMON SPACE REQUIRED :COMMON SPACE PROVIDED :

ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROV:ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE REQ:A-0.5GENERAL NOTES * AFFORDABLE UNITDrawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical,graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permissionof The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review andevaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
..\..\..\..\GENERAL OFFICE\2025 NATHAN\NATAN 25 + SIG.jpg 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS T-1.0
06-12-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
ByLayer
188 of 334

NOTES NOTES
’
’
” – ”
” ”
’
’
’
’
’
’
NOTES
·
·
·
““
·
“
·
·
·
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-0.1
06-12-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
189 of 334

NOTES NOTES
’
’
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-0.2
06-12-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
190 of 334

LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) NOTES
“”
“”

PUBLIC WORKS- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING NOTES
”
“”
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-0.3
06-2-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
191 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-0.4
03-26-2024
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
192 of 334

R2640'-0"R= 0.5 MILESMETRO BUS STOPROUTE #92BEELINE#5METRO BUS STOPROUTE #92BEELINE#7BEELINE#5 & #7BEELINE#5 & #7 FUTURE BRT STOPNOHO-PASADENA ROUTEDrawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-0.5
01-16-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
193 of 334

XXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
XXXXX
XXXX
X
X X
X
NOTES
LEGEND
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
D-1.0
07-9-2024
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
194 of 334

195 of 334

NOTES
LEGEND

PLUMBING NOTES
’
AVG. TOP OF CURB CALCULATIONEL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
A-4.0A
A-4.0A
A-4.0BA-4.0B
A-4.1CA-4.1C

G L E N O A K S B L V D
S88°19'00"E 94.00'PROPERTY LINE
PATIO
A-4.04
A-4.05
5% SLOPE MAX.

3.3% SLOPE MAX.

PLANTER LEGEND: (SEE SHEET L-1.0 FOR MORE DETAILS)
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-1.0
06-11-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
196 of 334

24"X84" GURNEY
24"X84" GURNEY
24"X84" GURNEY
5% SLOPE MAX.

3.3% SLOPE MAX.
24"X84" GURNEY
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-1.1
12-24-202424-102-GLEJPBFF
197 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-1.2
12-24-202424-102-GLEJPBFF
198 of 334

STORAGE
286.5 SF

ELECTRICAL
ROOM
305.1 SF
TRASH
ROOM
304.4 SF

ELEVATOR
84 SF
ELEV.

EQUIPMENT
84 SF
STAIRS
112.6 SF
UNIT NO 102
611.8 SF
UNIT NO 106
550.1 SF
UNIT NO 108
550.1 SF
UNIT NO 112
760.3 SF
UNIT NO 110
604.5 SF
UNIT NO 109
604.7 SF
UNIT NO 107
505.5 SF
UNIT NO 105
502.6 SF
UNIT NO 103
598.1 SF
UNIT NO 101
608.1 SF
UNIT NO 201
608.1 SF
UNIT NO 203
598.1 SF
UNIT NO 205
502.6 SF
UNIT NO 207
505.5 SF
UNIT NO 209
604.7 SF
UNIT NO 211
604.5 SF
UNIT NO 111
601.3 SF
UNIT NO 210
601.3 SF
UNIT NO 206
550.1SF
UNIT NO 208
550.1 SF
UNIT NO 104
601.3 SF
UNIT NO 204
601.3 SF
UNIT NO 301
608.1 SF
UNIT NO 303
598.1 SF
UNIT NO 305
502.6 SF
UNIT NO 307
505.5 SF
UNIT NO 309
604.7 SF
UNIT NO 311
604.5 SF
UNIT NO 310
601.3 SF
UNIT NO 306
550.1SF
UNIT NO 308
550.1 SF
UNIT NO 304
601.3 SF
UNIT NO 403
502.6 SF
UNIT NO 405
509 SF
UNIT NO 404
550.1 SF
UNIT NO 406
550.1 SF

BALCONY

48.2 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

48.2 SF

BALCONY

85.3 SF

BALCONY

60.6 SF

BALCONY
46 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY
47 SF

BALCONY

54.9 SF

BALCONY

48.2 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SFBALCONY

48.2 SFBALCONY

85.3 SF

BALCONY

60.6 SF

BALCONY
46 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY
47 SF

BALCONY

54.9 SF
UNIT NO 212
760.3 SF
UNIT NO 312
760.3 SF
STAIRS
162 SF
STAIRS
162 SF
STAIRS
162 SF
STAIRS
162 SF

ELEVATOR

87.7 SF

STORAGE
266.4 SF
STAIRS
182.2 SF

ELEVATOR

87.7 SF

ELEVATOR

87.7 SF

ELEVATOR

87.7 SF
UNIT NO 202
611.8 SF
UNIT NO 302
611.8 SF

STORAGE
165.7 SF

PARKING AREA
11524.2 SF
STAIRS
179.9 SF
STAIRS
209.3 SF

COMMON SPACE
1,561.3 SF
PATIO
306 SF
PATIO
325.2 SF
PATIO
458 SF
UNIT NO 401
713.8 SF

OPEN ABOVE
144 SF

OPEN BELLOW
144 SF

OPEN BELOW
144 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF
RAMP
1020 SF
PATIO

48.2 SF
PATIO

85.3 SF
PATIO

48.2 SF
PATIO
47 SF
PATIO

41.5 SF
PATIO

41.5 SF
UNIT NO 402
693.6SF
UNIT NO 407
697.5 SF
PATIO

60.6 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF
PATIO
45 SF
TRASH RM.

57.6 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF

HALLWAY
1,040.04 SF

ENTRANCE

87.9 SFUTILITY

36.08 SF
TRASH RM.

57.6 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF

HALLWAY
1,128.02 SF

UTILITY

36.08 SF
STAIRS
209.3 SF

UTILITY

36.08 SF
STAIRS
209.3 SF
TRASH RM.

57.6 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF

HALLWAY
1,123.7 SF

OPEN BELLOW
144 SF

OPEN BELOW
144 SF
PATIO

52.2 SF
DECK
343.2 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF
SHAFT

37.12 SF

HALLWAY
1,051.3 SF
GYM
163.5 SF

MANAGEMENT
156 SF
TRASH RM.

57.6 SF

BALCONY

49.5 SF

BALCONY

49.5 SF

BALCONY

41.5 SF
PATIO

54.9 SF
NORTH
NORTH
NORTH
NORTH
NORTH
2ND FLOOR

CORRIDOR

LIVABLE AREA

STAIRS, ELEVATOR

PATIO, BALCONY
1,168 S.F.
7,096 S.F.
426 S.F.
593 S.F.
3RD FLOOR

CORRIDOR

LIVABLE AREA

STAIRS, ELEVATOR

PATIO, BALCONY
1,398 S.F.
7,094 S.F.
426 S.F.
593 S.F.
4TH FLOOR

CORRIDOR

LIVABLE AREA

STAIRS, ELEVATOR

PATIO, BALCONY
1,541 S.F.
3,374 S.F.
443 S.F.
2,729 S.F.

PARKING 1
RAMP

PARKING AREA

STAIRS, ELEVATOR
STORAGE, ETC.
1,020 S.F.
11,524 S.F.
378 S.F.
571 S.F.
1ST FLOOR

CORRIDOR

LIVABLE AREA

STAIRS, ELEVATOR

PATIO, BALCONY
1,414 S.F.
7,689 S.F.
364 S.F.
520 S.F.

GYM163.5 S.F.

MANAGEMENT RM.156 S.F.

Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-1.3
06-11-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
199 of 334

NORTH
COMMON SPACE REQUIRED :

OPEN SPACE CALCULATION:
25 UNITS x 200 S.F. =5,000 S.F.

COMMON SPACE PROVIDED :

ON 1ST FLOOR:

ZONE C739.3 S.F.

ON 4TH FLOOR ROOFTOP:

ZONE A343.2 S.F.

TOTAL PROVIDED4,210.4 S.F.

WIDTH OF THE PROPERTY:

ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE:
(94'-90') * 20 S.F. =80 S.F.

ADDITIONAL 900 S.F.900 S.F.

TOTAL980 S.F.

ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED:

TOTAL PROVIDED0 S.F.
94'
NORTH
NORTH
NORTH
LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE:

MAXIMUM ALLOWED LOT COVERAGE:

LOT COVERAGE:
50% OF LOT AREA
17,100.81 X 50% =8,550.4 S.F.

PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE:9,141.2 S.F. (53.45%)
MINIMUM PERMANENTLY LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE:
25% OF LOT AREA
17,100.8 X 25% =4,275.2 S.F.

PROVIDED:

LANDSCAPING:

ON FIRST FLOOR: 1,439.6 S.F. (21.85%)
ON FOURTH FLOOR: 340.4 S.F. (5.2%)
TOTAL PROVIDED 1,780 S.F. (27.02%)
HARDSCAPING:

ON FIRST FLOOR: 3,278.7 S.F. (49.8%)
ON FOURTH FLOOR: 1,524.2 S.F. (23.1 %)
TOTAL PROVIDED 4,806.9 S.F. (72.9%)
TOTAL PROVIDED6,586.9 S.F.

38.5% OF LOT AREA
ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED:

ZONE B1,521.4 S.F.
18 UNITS x 200 S.F. =2,700 S.F.

TOTAL7,700 S.F.

ZONE B:

LANDSCAPING: 340.4 S.F.

HARDSCAPING: 1,181 S.F.

TOTAL: 1,521.4 S.F.

ZONE B:

LANDSCAPING: 0 S.F.

HARDSCAPING: 342.2 S.F.

TOTAL: 342.2 S.F.

NOTE: FIRST FLOOR CALCULATIONS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF

REQUIRED FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE
ZONE D1,606.5 S.F.
(A CONCESSION IS REQUESTED FOR THIS REQUIREMENT)
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-1.4
01-16-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
200 of 334

EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
A-4.0
A
A-4.0
A
A-4.0
B
A-4.0
B
A-4.1
C
A-4.1
C

G L E N O A K S B L V D
S88°19'00"E 94.00' PROPERTY LINE
PATIO
A-4.0
4 A-4.0
5 5% SLOPE
MAX.

3.3% SLOPE
MAX.

NEW MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-1.5
01-14-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
201 of 334

GLENOAKS BOULEVARD
EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY

NO PARKING
A-4.0
1 1
A-4.1
A-4.0
2 B-B
A-A
C-C
S88°19'00"E 94.00' PROPERTY LINE
2% SLOPE
MAX.
2% SLOPE
MAX.
2% SLOPE
MAX.
2% SLOPE
MAX.
2% SLOPE
MAX.
2% SLOPE
MAX.

NOTES
“
”
”
”
STORAGE SPACE CALC.

Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-2.0
06-12-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
202 of 334

EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
A-4.01
1A-4.1
A-4.02 B-B

A-A C-C
A-4.04
A-4.05
5% SLOPE MAX.

3.3% SLOPE MAX.

NOTES
LEGEND
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-2.1
01-16-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
203 of 334

24"X84" GURNEY
A-4.01
1A-4.1
A-4.02 B-B

A-A C-C
A-4.04
A-4.05
NOTES
LEGEND
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-2.2
01-16-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
204 of 334

EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
A-4.01
1A-4.1
A-4.02 B-B

A-A C-C
A-4.04
A-4.05
NOTES
LEGEND
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-2.3
01-16-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
205 of 334

NOTES
LEGEND
24"X84" GURNEY
A-4.01
1A-4.1
A-4.02 B-B

A-A C-C
A-4.04
A-4.05
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-2.4
03-26-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
206 of 334

NOTES
LEGEND
MECH. EQUIPMENT SCREEN
2x2 STEEL POST

STEEL CHANNEL
1x4 WOOD PLANKS
PLAN

SECTION
2x2 STEEL POST

STEEL CHANNEL
1x4 WOOD PLANKS
MECH. EQPMT
A-4.0
1 1
A-4.1
A-4.0
2 B-B
A-A
C-C
A-4.0
4 A-4.0
5 Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-2.5
01-16-2025
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
207 of 334

544
ELEVATION NOTES:

MATERIALS & FINISHES
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :

Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-3.0
03-26-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
208 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-3.1
03-26-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
NOTE:SEE A-3.0 FOR MATERIAL SPECS.
209 of 334

Drawing Content :Date :Revisions :Date : Job No : Manager : Designer : Drawing No :Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical,graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicatedor commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permissionof The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review andevaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendorsand office personnel only in accordance with this notice.PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:1775 N SUMMITRIDGE DR.LOS ANGELES, CA 90210SUMMITRIDGE####07-15-202422-108-SUMJPB/FF FF

WINDOWS FRAME STONE VENEER

URBANA SMOOTH STONE VENEER
PRODUCT: URBANA
COLOR: FRENCH WHITE
CORONADO.COM
TEL: 800.847.8663

SMOOTH STUCCO

WROUGHT IRON RAILING
METAL

OUTDOOR LIGHTING- MEDIUM WALL MOUNT LANTERN

GARAGE DOOR

GLASS RAILING

PATIO DOOR

SIERRA PACIFIC WINDOWS
PRODUCT: CLAD MULTI-SLIDE

PLUS SYSTEMS
SIERRAPACIFICWINDOWS.COM
TEL: 800.824.77.44

CRL GRS GLAZING SYSTES
CRLAURENCE.COM
TEL:800.421.6144

HINKLEY
PRODUCT: ATLANTIS
FINISH: BRONZE
WWW. HINKLEY.COM
TEL: 440.653.5500

ALPINE SILVER FOR METAL

CAPS, FASCIA,

DOWNSPOUTS,

GUTTERS, & BALCONY

RAILINGS

CUSTOMIZED PATTERN

CUT METAL PLATE

STUCCO BUILDING COLOR

DUNN EDWARDS
PRODUCT: PAINT COLOR
COLOR: SPARKLING FROST
DUNNEDWARDS.COM
TEL: 888.337.2468

SMOOTH STUCCO

STUCCO BUILDING COLOR

DUNN EDWARDS
PRODUCT: PAINT COLOR
COLOR: SHINING KNIGHT
DUNNEDWARDS.COM
TEL: 888.337.2468

MODULAR ORNAMENT

WAYNE DALTON

COMMERCIAL DOORS
MODEL: 600 HC
WAYNE-DALTON.COM

SIERRA PACIFIC WINDOWS
PRODUCT: ALUMINUM CLAD

WOOD FRAME IN BRONZE

COLOR AND METALLIC FINISH
SIERRAPACIFICWINDOWS.COM
TEL: 800.824.77.44
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)
(OR EQUAL PRODUCT)

SMOOTH STUCCO

STUCCO BUILDING COLOR

DUNN EDWARDS
PRODUCT: PAINT COLOR
COLOR:SNOWY EVERGREEN
DUNNEDWARDS.COM
TEL: 888.337.2468
Drawing Content :

Date : Revisions :

Date :

Job No :

Manager :

Designer :

Drawing No :

Notice : The design shown and described herein including all technical, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of The BOLADarck Design Corp. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this notice.

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:
441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD
GLENDALE, CA 91202

GLENOAKS APARTMENTS
A-3.2
07-15-2024
24-102-GLE
JPB
FF
210 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-4.0
01-15-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
211 of 334

5% SLOPE MAX.

3.3% SLOPE MAX.

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-4.1
01-15-202524-102-GLEJPBFF
212 of 334

18.0000
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-5.0
09-10-202424-102-GLEJPBFF
213 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-5.1
09-10-202424-102-GLEJPBFF
214 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-5.2
09-10-202424-102-GLEJPBFF
215 of 334

Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91202GLENOAKS APARTMENTS A-5.3
09-10-202424-102-GLEJPBFF
216 of 334

LINE OF PLANTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK/PATIOWHERE OCCURS3/4" RADIUSWITH LIGHT BROOM FINISH.1/4" RADIUSTOOLED JOINTSTOP OF CONCRETEWITH SWIRL FINISH 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. U.N.O.SHEAR PANEL PER STRUCTURAL DWGS3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER OVER LATHWATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERANCHORING SYSTEM PER M.B.PRECAST STONE CAP PER OWNERWATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER8" CMU WALLSOIL PER LANDSCAPE DWGS

CONC DECK PER STRUCTURAL DWGSWATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERJ MOLDING CAULKINGCEMENT PLASTER - TOP OF WALLTO 1" ABOVE DIRT
DECK METAL & W.P. MEMBRANE
WROUGHT-IRON RAILINGCONNECTION PER STRUCTURALANCHORING SYSTEM PER M.B.PRECAST STONE CAP PER OWNER3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER6" CMU WALL @ PLANTER WALLSCONC DECK PER STRUCTURALSOIL PER LANDSCAPE DWGSWATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERSLEEVE PER STRUCTURALCEMENT PLASTER - TOP OF WALLTO 1" ABOVE DIRT

WHERE APPLICABLE

SEE STRUCTURAL DWG FOR INFORCING

SLAT DETAIL
_____GAGE
NOTES:1. CLEARANCES SHOWN ARE MAXIMUMS, LESSER CLEARANCES MAY BE POSSIBLE.2. EVERY SLAT SHALL BE LOCKED FROM LATERAL MOVEMENT BY A STITCH LOCK SYSTEM, WITH ENDLOCKS.4. FERROUS SURFACES EXCEPT GALVANIZED ARE FACTORY PRIMED.5. ALL OPENING PREPARATION, ELECTRICAL POWER & FIELD PAINTING SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.3. CURTAIN SHALL RECEIVE A BAKED ON PRIME PAINT PRIOR TO ROLL FORMING.

SPOT WELDTYP BOTH SIDES3/8" DIA

HEADPLATE(BEARING END)

COUNTERBALANCEASSEMBLYHEADPLATE(TENSION END)
WALL ANGLE24 OR 26 GA.CURTAININSIDE ELEVATION - COIL-AWAY DOORMASONRYWOODSTEEL_____________ 8"
%2%2
NOTE:REFER TO SITE PLANS FOR RACKLOCATION. POWDER COATED BLACK BIKERACK FINISH

PEDESTAL MOUNT BASEBASE COVER

BOLLARD ASSEMBLY WITH TWO LOOPS
±00'-00"T.O.P.
±00'-00"T.O.P.

RACK ELEVATION

RACK PLAN

BOLLARD ASSEMBLY WITH TWO LOOPS
916" DIA. HOLES PROVIDED FOR 12" DIA. EXP.ANCHORS (TYPICAL-3) 4"-0"
±00'-00"T.O.P.

NOTE:INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER'SSPECIFICATIONS

CONCRETE SLAD/FLOOR
2X2 TOP PLATE2X STUD WALL2X SILL PLATE
2X CAPFLASHING

STUCCO STUCCO
3-COAT CEMENT PLASTERSOIL PER LANDSCAPE DWGSWATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERCEMENT PLASTER - TOP OF WALLTO 1" ABOVE DIRT6" CMU WALL @ PLANTER WALLSCONC DECK PER STRUCTURAL WROUGHT-IRON RAILINGCONNECTION PER STRUCTURALANCHORING SYSTEM PER M.B.PRECAST STONE CAP PER OWNER3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER6" CMU WALL @ PLANTER WALLSCONC DECK PER STRUCTURALSOIL PER LANDSCAPE DWGSWATER-RESISTIVE BARRIERSLEEVE PER STRUCTURALCEMENT PLASTER - TOP OF WALLTO 1" ABOVE DIRTPRECAST STONE CAP

WEEP HOLE
Drawing Content :

Date :Revisions :

Date :Job No :Manager :Designer :Drawing No :

PROJECT NAME & SITE ADDRESS:1775 N SUMMITRIDGE DR.LOS ANGELES, CA 90210SUMMITRIDGE AD-1
07-11-202422-108-SUMJPB/FFFF
217 of 334

GLENOAKS BOULEVARD
EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY

NON-SLIP PORCELAIN PAVERS
RAISED PLANTERS, TYP. REFER TOARCHITECTURAL PLANS.

PATIO
BBQ

FIREPITBENCH
DINING
XYLOSMA CONGESTUM `COMPACTA`(111) 15 galCHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM(46) 1 gal LAURUS X 'SARATOGA'(2) 15 gal
RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY'(2) 15 gal
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS(22) 5 galPHORMIUM X `BLACK ADDER`(17) 5 gal PHYLA NODIFLORA `KURAPIA S1`(850) flat
DIETES GRANDIFLORA `VARIEGATA`(13) 5 gal
FATSIA JAPONICA `VARIEGATA`(2) 15 gal ASPIDISTRA ELATIOR 'LITTLE JOHN'(32) 1 gal2 2 HEDERA HELIX(24) 1 gal
L-1.0

GROUND FLOORPLANTING PLAN
0 feet161/8" = 1'-0"8 24
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAA
Revisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE
16 SYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEWATER USEQTYSHRUBSAspidistra elatior 'Little John'Little John Cast Iron Plant1 galModerate32Chondropetalum tectorumCape Rush1 galLow46Dietes grandiflora `Variegata`Striped Fortnight Lily5 galLow13Fatsia japonica `Variegata`Camouflage® Variegated Fatsia15 galModerate2Hedera helixEnglish Ivy1 galModerate24Muhlenbergia rigensDeer Grass5 galLow22Phormium x `Black Adder`New Zealand Flax5 galLow17Xylosma congestum `Compacta`Compact Xylosma15 galLow111 NOTE : PROVIDE MINIMUM SOIL DEPTH OF 24" FOR ALL PLANTERS, AND 36" FOR PLANTERS WITH TREES.LID PLANTERS TO BE DESIGNED BY CIVIL ENGINEER.

SYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEWATER USEQTYTREESLaurus x 'Saratoga'Saratoga Hybrid Laurel15 galLow2Rhaphiolepis indica 'Majestic Beauty'Majestic Beauty Indian Hawthorn15 galLow2GROUND COVERSPhyla nodiflora `Kurapia S1`KurapiaflatLow12 flats PLANT SCHEDULE GROUND LEVELSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONQTYTournesol Siteworks WR-7200F8LxWxH - 72in. x 72in. x 42in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R2020-4k-E.2REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE GROUND LEVELNOTE : PLANT SELECTIONS ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT AND COMPLY WITH THE STATE MODEL WATEREFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (MWELO). 218 of 334

24"X84" GURNEY
ARBUTUS UNEDO `OKTOBERFEST`(7) 5 galLOMANDRA CONFERTIFOLIA 'MISLIMRA'(81) 1 galRHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY'(3) 15 galPHORMIUM TENAX 'JACK SPRATT'(54) 1 gal 12 3
4 NON-SLIP PORCELAINDECK PAVERS SET ONPAVER PEDESTALS
L-1.1
4TH FLOORPLANTING PLAN
0 feet161/8" = 1'-0"8 24
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE
16 NOTE : PROVIDE MINIMUM SOIL DEPTH OF 24" FOR ALL PLANTERS, AND 36" FOR PLANTERS WITH TREES.

SYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEWATER USEQTYTREESRhaphiolepis indica 'Majestic Beauty'Majestic Beauty Indian Hawthorn15 galLow3SHRUBSArbutus unedo `Oktoberfest`Strawberry Tree5 galLow7Phormium tenax 'Jack Spratt'New Zealand Flax1 galLow54SYMBOLBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEWATER USESPACINGQTYGROUND COVERSLomandra confertifolia 'Mislimra'Leading® Lime Mist™ Mat Rush1 galLow18" o.c.81 PLANT SCHEDULE 4TH FLOOR
Tournesol Wilshire Planters
SYMBOLDESCRIPTIONQTYTournesol Siteworks WR-9648366LxWxH - 96in. x 48in. x 36in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R1620-4k. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.Tournesol Siteworks WR-7200F3LxWxH - 72in. x 72in. x 42in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R2020-4k-E. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.Tournesol Siteworks WR-4800F1LxWxH - 48in. x 48in. x 36in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R2920-2k. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.Tournesol Siteworks WR-4818362LxWxH - 48in. x 18in. x 36in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R1620-2k. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI. 1234
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE 4TH FLOOR
NOTE : PLANT SELECTIONS ARE DROUGHT TOLERANT AND COMPLY WITH THE STATE MODEL WATEREFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (MWELO). 219 of 334

L-1.2
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 Laurus 'Saratoga'
Chondropetalum tectorum
Xylosma 'Compactum'
Dietes grandiflora 'Variegata'
NATIVE GRADE OR CERTIFIEDCOMPACTED SUBGRADEAPPROVED BACKFILL;THOROUGHLY MIXED PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.

A SHALLOW BASIN 2'' DEEP SHALLBE FORMED AROUND ROOT BALLBELOW FINISH GRADE. TREESPLANTED IN LAWN SHALL NOT HAVEBASINS.ROOT BALL CROWN TOEXTEND 1" ABOVE FINISHGRADE THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO 15GAL & 24" BOX TREES10' LODGE POLESTAKE PLACEDON WINDWARDSIDE OF TREEFINISHGRADE RUBBERTIESPOTHOLE AS NECESSARY TOVERIFY THE ABSENCE ORPRESENCE OF SUBSURFACEUTILITIES BEFORE AUGERINGFOR DEEP WELL DRAIN.

PLANTING TABLETS. PLACE IN PIT2/3 UP FROM PIT BOTTOM. SEESPECIFICATIONS.TREE STAKINGN.T.S.329343.39-031 SHRUB PLANTINGN.T.S.2X DIAMETER OF ROOT BALLDEPTH OF CONTAINER 1234
NOTES:1.SEE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFPLANT MATERIALS.2.CROWN OF ROOTBALL TO BE 1/2"-1" ABOVE FINISHGRADE.3.PLANTING HOLE TO BE DUSTED WITH GYPSUMBEFORE BACKFILLING.A SHALLOW BASIN 2"DEEP SHALL BEFORMED AROUNDROOTBALL BELOWFINISH GRADE1FINISH GRADE2APPROVED BACKFILL,THOROUGHLY MIXEDPRIOR TOINSTALLATION (SEESPECIFICATIONS)3UNDISTURBED NATIVEGRADE OR CERTIFIEDCOMPACTED FILL PERSPECIFICATIONS42 329333.13-04 GROUND COVER SPACINGN.T.S.

EQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.

TYP. PLANT-SPACING VARIES.SEE PLANT LEGEND ANDPLANS.

EDGE OF PLANTING AREA
NOTES:1.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL SPACING (TRIANGULAR)UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON PLANS.2.CENTERLINE OF PLANTS SHALL BE 1/2 OF EQUAL SPACING MINIMUMFROM EDGE OF PLANTING AREA.3.INFILL PLANTS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SPACING AT IRREGULAREDGES. 3 329333.83-01

PLANT GALLERYAND DETAILS
Rhaphiolepis 'Majestic Beauty'
Syagrus romanzoffiana
Phormium 'Black Adder'
Phormium t. 'Jack Spratt'
Arbutus 'Oktoberfest'
Aspidistra elatior
Fatsias japonica 'Variegata'
Lomandra confertifolia
Muhlenbergia rigens
Hedera helix
220 of 334

GLENOAKS BOULEVARD
EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
24"X84" GURNEY
PATIO
L-1.3
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 OUTDOORGATHERING SPACES

BARBEQUE

FIREPIT

BENCHES

DINING AREAS
221 of 334

GLENOAKS BOULEVARD
EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
PATIO
mcC
mcC
mcC
mcC
mcC mcCmcC
mcCNOTE: PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL EQUIPMENTTO PLACED WITHIN PROPERTY LINES ANDSCREENED FROM VIEW. 116.681"11101.951"1094.891"9

1.56131"130.56134"1 0.44234"2 30.534"3

0.56534"51.4634"60.5671"71.86834"8

0.9434"4
1221"12
L-2.0

GROUND FLOORIRRIGATION PLAN
0 feet161/8" 1'-0"824
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

24"X84" GURNEY
12 3
4 NON-SLIP PORCELAINDECK PAVERS SET ONPAVER PEDESTALS
L-2.1
3RD FLOORIRRIGATION PLAN
0 feet161/8" 1'-0"824
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 NOTE:1.REFER TO PLUMBING PLAN FOR POINT OF CONNECTION.MINIMUM 34" COPPER WATER SUPPLY LINE REQUIRED AT EACHPOC WITH A MINIMUM 30 PSI STATIC WATER PRESSURE.2.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRESSURE PRIOR TO BEGINNINGWORK.IRRIGATION TO BE PROVIDED MANUALLY TO WATER RESERVOIRSSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONQTYDETAILTournesol Siteworks WR-96483661/L-3.2LxWxH - 96in. x 48in. x 36in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R1620-4k. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.Tournesol Siteworks WR-7200F32/L-3.2LxWxH - 72in. x 72in. x 42in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R2020-4k-E. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.Tournesol Siteworks WR-4800F13/L-3.2LxWxH - 48in. x 48in. x 36in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R2920-2k. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.Tournesol Siteworks WR-48183621/L-3.2LxWxH - 48in. x 18in. x 36in. Include irrigation insertCWM-R1620-2k. Order with standard accessory pocketSAP-FI.. 1234
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE 4TH FLOOR
223 of 334

L-2.2

IRRIGATION SCHEDULEAND MWELO
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE
16 SYMBOLMANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTIONPSIDETAILHunter PROS-06-PCNFlood Bubbler, 6in. pop-up.307/L-3.0SYMBOLMANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTIONDETAILHunter ACZ-075-25Drip control kit featuring a 3/4in. PGV-ASV valve,with 3/4in. HY075 filter system, and 25psi pressureregulated. Flow range: 0.5 GPM to 15 GPM. With150 mesh stainless steel screen.1/L-3.0Hunter ICZ-101-25-LFDrip Control Zone Kit. 1in. ICV Globe Valve with 1in.HY100 filter system. Pressure Regulation: 25 psi.Flow Range: .5 GPM - 15 GPM. 150 mesh stainlesssteel screen.2/L-3.0Hunter PLD-BVManual flush/shut off valve, barbed insert. Typicallyinstalled in 10in. box, with adequate blank tubing toextend valve out of valve box. Use with HDL orother 3/4in. dripline.6/L-3.0Hunter PLD-AVRPLD-AVR allows for air to escape a RESIDENTIALdrip irrigation system to prevent blockage and waterhammering. 1/2in. MPT connection with 80 PSImaximum rating.3/L-3.0Hunter ECO-IDECO-ID: 1/2in. FPT connection with 12 psi-70 psioperating pressure. Specify with Hunter SJ swingjoint. 4/L-3.0Area to Receive DriplineHunter HDL-06-12-PCHDL-06-12-PC: Hunter Dripline with 0.6 GPH flow.Light brown tubing with gray striping. Emitters at 12"O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 12" apart, withemitters offset for triangular pattern. Install withHunter PLD barbed or PLD-LOC fittings.5/L-3.0Area to Receive DriplineHunter HDL-09-18-PCHDL-09-18-PC: Hunter Dripline with 0.9 GPH flow.Light brown tubing with black striping. Emitters at 18"O.C. Dripline laterals spaced at 18" apart, withemitters offset for triangular pattern. Install withHunter PLD barbed or PLD-LOC fittings.SYMBOLMANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTIONDETAILHunter PGV-101A1in. Plastic Electric Remote Control Valve, forResidential/Light Commercial Use. Female NPTInlet/Outlet. Angle Configuration, With Flow Control.8/L-3.0Nibco T-585-70Brass ball valve shut off valve9/L-3.0Pressure Reducing ValveZurn Wilkins Model 500XL 3/4"Febco 825Y 3/4"Reduced Pressure Backflow Preventer10/L-3.0Hunter NODE-100Single Station Controller, Outdoor, Battery Powered.DC Latching Solenoid Included.1/L-3.1Hunter PC-400Light Commercial & Residential Controller, 4-stationbase module controller, 120 VAC, Outdoor model2/L-3.1Hunter MINI-CLIKRain Sensor, mount as noted1/L-3.1Hunter Solar-Sync-SenSolar, rain freeze sensor with outdoor interface,connects to Hunter X-Core and ACC Controllers,install as noted. Includes gutter mount bracket.Wired. Module not included. Locate and install permanufacturer`s specifications.3/L-3.1Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 80 C

IRRIGATION SCHEDULE

MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (MWELO)
224 of 334

GLENOAKS BOULEVARD
EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
PATIO
LID PLANTER DRAIN, TYP.SEE ENGINEERING PLANS.

NOTE: PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL EQUIPMENTTO PLACED WITHIN PROPERTY LINES ANDSCREENED FROM VIEW. 11109
131 2 3
5678
4VALVES 1&2: LOW WATER USE
VALVE 13: LOW WATER USE
VALVES 9-12: LOWWATER USE
VALVES 5-8 LOW WATER USE
VALVES 3&4: LOW WATER USEPRE-FAB PLANTER RESERVOIRS:MODERATE WATER USEHAND-WATER12

INSTALL DRIP IRRIGATION SUB-SURFACE BELOW KURAPIA
L-2.3

GROUND FLOORHYDROZONE MAP
0 feet161/8" 1'-0"824
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 225 of 334

24"X84" GURNEY
PRE-FAB PLANTER RESERVOIRS:LOW WATER USE. HANDWATER
L-2.4
3RD FLOORHYDROZONE MAP
0 feet161/8" 1'-0"824
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 226 of 334

L-3.0

DETAILS
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 LEGEND14"ABOVEFINISHGRADEHUNTER POP-UP BODY(PROS-06), NOZZLE ANDCAP PER PLANFINISHED GRADEADJACENT LANDSCAPELATERAL PIPE PER PLANLATERAL FITTING PERPLANFIELD-BUILT SWING ARM654321 HUNTER PROS-06 BUBBLERN.T.S.7 P-RE-BOL-GLEN-04
HUNTER DRIP ZONECONTROL KIT (ACZ) WITHFILTER AND PRESSUREREGULATION18-24" COILED WIRE WITHWATERPROOFCONNECTORSSCHEDULE 80 PVCNIPPLESFINISH GRADEMAINLINE PIPE ANDFITTINGSLATERAL PIPE ANDFITTINGS LEGEND
654321
HUNTER ANTI-SIPHON DRIP CONTROL ZONEN.T.S.1 P-RE-BOL-GLEN-34 LEGEND
HUNTER DRIP CONTROL ZONE1 1/2" 1'-0"2 P-RE-BOL-GLEN-05 HUNTER AUTOMATIC FLUSH VALVE (AFV-B) WITH 5/8" [17 mm] BARB CONNECTIONHUNTER RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX AND LID (MB-0811).LID COLORS: STANDARD BLACK, PURPLE FOR RECYCLED WATER USE, AND OTHERCOLORS AVAILABLE, SEE HUNTER CATALOG.FINISHED GRADEGRAVEL BASE, DEPTH AS SPECIFIEDCOMMON HALF BRICK, 2 TOTAL, INSTALL ONE ON EACH SHORT SIDE OF BOX.HUNTER BLANK TUBING (PLD-BLNK) TO DRIPLINE ZONE, 5/8" [17 mm] SEELEGEND321654123456HUNTER FLUSH VALVE3" 1'-0"6 P-RE-BOL-GLEN-38 3" 1'-0"DRIP AIR RELIEF VALVE IN BOX
34"X1"MPT ADAPTER.1" FPTXMPT ELL.AS SPECIFIED.AIR RELIEF VALVEDRIPLINE OR 1/2" DRIP TUBING.34"FPT X 12" DRIP TUBINGADAPTER.DRIP TUBING COUPLING.GRADE.FINISHED6" DRIP BOX.2" 3" THICK LAYER OF WASHEDGRAVEL. THE BOX SHALL RESTUPON THE ROCK BED. DO NOTEXTEND GRAVEL INTO BOX. 3 328413.53-03
LATERAL LINE-SIZE per PLANFINISH GRADEECO INDICATOR DRIP INDICATOR HEAD123 451/2" MARLEX STREET ELLS (3)SCH 80 NIPPLE 2 3
1454
ECO INDICATOR (DRIP INDICATOR HEAD)N.T.SP-RE-BOL-GLEN-03412LEGEND:HUNTER DRIPLINE(HDL) PER PLAN3FINISHED GRADE6HDL RISER - LENGTHAS REQUIREDPLD OR PLD-LOCFITTING5MULCH (ASSPECIFIED)7SOIL8PVC SUPPLYHEADER - SIZE PERPLANDEPTH PERPLAN412345678PLD OR PLD-LOCFITTING HUNTER DRIPLINE - CONNECTION WITH DRIPLINE AND ELBOWN.T.S.5 P-RE-BOL-GLEN-89LEGEND HUNTER PGV VALVE1 1/2" 1'-0"8 P-RE-BOL-GLEN-13NIBCO BALL VALVEN.T.S.

VARIES, SEE12
3 4
5 6
78 9
4 NOTE:1.BALL VALVE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISEDIRECTED.2.USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL THREADED FITTINGS. 3" MIN.-10" MAX.12"6"
VALVE BOX WITH COVER:RAINBIRD VB-STD1HANDLE212 INCH DEPTH OF 3/4 INCHWASHED CRUSHED ROCK3PVC UNION SCH. 80 (2)4PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE.LENGTH AS REQUIRED.5BALL VALVE6PVC MALE ADAPTER SCH.807FINISH GRADE/TOP OFMULCH 2" FOR SHRUB &G.C. AREAS,1" FOR LAWNAREAS8BRICK (1 OF 2)9328406.33-069 N.T.S.REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE GALVANIZED RISERS.

CODE.HEIGHT ASPER LOCAL
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOWDEVICE AS SPECIFIED.GALVANIZED NIPPLES ANDELL AS REQUIRED.GALVANIZED UNIONS ATEACH SIDE.GALVANIZED ELL ANDNIPPLE, TYPICAL EA. SIDE.PVC COUPLER ANDSCHEDULE 80 TOE NIPPLE,TYPICAL EACH SIDE.MAIN LINE, SIZEAS PER PLANS.CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS,90 LBS. OF CONCRETE EACH.SERVICESIDE. 10P-RE-BRO-BUDL-11
227 of 334

L-3.1

DETAILS
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 HUNTER NODE AND MINI CLIKN.T.S.

TO CONTROLLER
12 3456MINI CLIK SENSOR1POST OR SUITABLEMOUNTING SURFACE2IRRIGATION CONTROLLER(NODE) PER PLAN3VALVE PER PLAN4PVC MAIN LINE5FINISHED GRADE6 LEGEND
1 P-RE-BRU-MART-01
*NOTE*SPECIFY 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 STATION MODEL CONTROLLER. MOUNTCONTROLLER WITH LCD SCREEN AT EYE LEVEL. CONTROLLERSHALL BE HARD-WIRED TO GROUNDED 110 VAC SOURCE.

EXTERIOR WALLMODEL PC-XX00MINIMUM CLEARANCEFOR DOOR OPENINGCONTROL WIRE IN ELECTRICALCONDUIT. SIZE AND TYPEPER LOCAL CODEELECTRICAL SUPPLY CONDUIT.CONNECT TO POWER SOURCE.J BOX INSIDE CONTROLLER.

HUNTER PRO-C CONTROLLERN.T.S.2 328409.13-12HUNTER SOLAR SYNC ET SENSORN.T.S.7 2 63114523457 63HUNTER PRO-C CONTROLLERCONDUIT FROM SOLAR SYNCSENSOR TO CONTROLLER ORTO A POINT 12" BELOW GRADESUITABLE POST, POLE, ORGUTTER MOUNT. MOUNT INLOCATION WHERE SENSOR CANRECEIVE FULL SUN, IS OPEN TORAINFALL AND OUT OFSPRINKLER SPRAY PATTERNMODEL: SOLAR SYNC SENSOR COMMUNICATION WIRE, 18-2(WIRE TYPETO MEET INSTALLATION CODEREQUIREMENTS), FROM MODULE TOSENSOR. MAXIMUM TOTAL WIREDISTANCE, 200 FEETMODEL SOLAR SYNC MODULEMOUNT LESS THAN 6' AWAY FROMCONTROLLER. 328409.66-023
228 of 334

L-3.2

PLANTER BOXIRRIGATION RESERVOIRDETAILS
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620f3a7860b.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620f45fb4dc.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R162026fb8859.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620ba6e9dd8.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620d882cfe4.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620a013a061.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R16208a4be335.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620cf649259.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620aaf04609.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620e4a1ffbf.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R162001476620.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R162099984315.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620b72d7d53.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620b11faef1.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R16205da5df50.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620eb75a04e.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620e0006e9e.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R16204afa2bf3.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620e5b2b5cb.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620a593fe75.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R162006d01b83.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620261cfc55.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R16208ad96f01.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620c13cc5fd.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620e035fcef.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R16205918f6c6.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R162031fd7913.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620f9efd9e1.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620688c5ac6.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620fa4dd002.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R16206b7b387f.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620ff5e9c75.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620469e638e.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620884c4778.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620b0254672.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620600657db.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R1620038a6db7.png APPROVALSignature authorizes Planter Technologyto manufacture the product as shownTamper Resistant StopperCWM-R1620-2K-ADJWater Capacity=9 galCWM-R1620-2K-CRTWater Capacity=9 galMoisture Sensor (typical)One per systemFiller Tube TopMay be trimmed in fieldFiller Tube BottomMay be trimmed in field20CWM-1620-Master Unit(Illustrated)Hose Barbs16CWM-R1620-4K-LINWater Capacity=18 gal18 3/4With hose barbsList of MaterialsFiller Filler Hose Hose 90 deg OverflowProductCWM-R1620-3K-LINWater Capacity=13.5 galBioGuard Root Guard FabricTo cover water inlet portsCWM-R1620-2K-LINWater Capacity=9 galCWM-R1620-MSWater Capacity=4.5 galOverflow Drain AdapterIncludes GE Clear Silicone Adhesive CWM-R1620-MSTube Tube (feet) Clamps Elbow DrainTop Bottom1 1 0 0000CWM-R1620-2K-LIN 1 1 3 4CWM-R1620-3K-LIN 1 1 6 8CWM-R1620-4K-LIN 1 1 9 12 0CWM-R1620-2K-CRT 1 1 10 24 8CWM-R1620-2K-ADJ 1 1 3 84CHECKEDDRAWNRudy GalindoQAAPPROVEDMFGSCALESIZEC6/23/2008TITLECWM-R1620-SystemDWG NOCWM-R1620-All ProductsSHEET 1 OF 1REVTournesol Siteworks42326 Albrae Street, Fremont, CA 94538(800) 542-228211111Adapter1Included on all units(except MS)12 7/8 TOURNESOL IRRIGATION INSERT CWM-R1620N.T.S.1 P-RE-WES-05TOURNESOL IRRIGATION INSERT CWM-R2020N.T.S.

C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020da4e28f9.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020e2c28c21.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20202e60f8d2.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202092b64c66.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020ffe15da3.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020613fa803.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202039daa47e.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020b5d1bf7a.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020dc840cde.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202022fc0cf2.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020ef76c6b7.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202024fd2164.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020fbb84884.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202068c8466d.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202043e9ed0d.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202002414c72.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202042a6719d.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20205fdf6a8f.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020103e91a8.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020bb54ae2d.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20208ec4c544.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020c0960ea3.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20201167ceed.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20200e548024.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020a896a46b.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202066eeb4c3.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020a87ebc52.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202054652ee2.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020d5d41088.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020d5445ed8.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020158ed67d.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20204e87a592.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20200bfe5956.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020693c28d8.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2020c717514c.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202078fe3708.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R202072f774d1.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R20209c20f8da.png APPROVALSignature authorizes Planter Technologyto manufacture the product as shownTamper Resistant StopperCWM-R2020-2K-ADJWater Capacity=11.5 galCWM-R2020-2K-CRTWater Capacity=11.5 galMoisture Sensor (typical)One per systemFiller Tube BottomMay be trimmed in field20Filler Tube TopMay be trimmed in field CWM-2020-Master Unit(Illustrated)20CWM-R2020-4K-LINWater Capacity=23 gal22 3/4With hose barbsProductCWM-R2020-3K-LINWater Capacity=17.25 galBioGuard Root Guard FabricTo cover water inlet portsCWM-R2020-2K-LINWater Capacity=11.5 galCWM-R2020-MSWater Capacity=5.75 galOverflow Drain AdapterIncludes GE Clear Silicone Adhesive CWM-R2020-MSList of MaterialsFiller Filler Hose Hose 90 deg OverflowTube Tube (feet) Clamps Elbow DrainTop Bottom1 1 0 0000CWM-R2020-2K-LIN 1 1 3 4CWM-R2020-3K-LIN 1 1 6 8CWM-R2020-4K-LIN 1 1 9 12 0CWM-R2020-2K-CRT 1 1 10 24 8CWM-R2020-2K-ADJ 1 1 3 84CHECKEDDRAWNRudy GalindoQAAPPROVEDMFGSCALESIZEC6/23/2008TITLECWM-R2020-SystemDWG NOCWM-R2020-All ProductsSHEET 1 OF 1REVTournesol Siteworks42326 Albrae Street, Fremont, CA 94538(800) 542-228211111Adapter1Hose BarbsIncluded on all units(except MS)12 3/4 2 P-RE-WES-94
TOURNESOL IRRIGATION INSERT CWM-R2920N.T.S.

C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29202f1d1146.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920c2b6aa54.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292011a2c5ac.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920e2bfb9f1.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920b21cc449.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920914b3f54.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292015cee86b.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29208b33ce51.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29207946c4e3.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920938c1223.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920818ac2fd.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29203ec1b719.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29209ac0b6e0.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920fd119ba6.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920d0f79830.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920b980757f.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29209f5fe249.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29207aacc18c.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292012832243.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920aabe9df2.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920958a986f.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292002f00a29.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292035e1a70a.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29206dde2574.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292077160028.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292077e9cea9.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920eb32f0e5.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292093417101.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29201b3c3680.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920775ff00d.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920cbdea0c1.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292014dda3c3.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R292042020f2c.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920f088e27f.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920251d67e2.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R29204239d746.png C:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920217bb392.pngC:\Users\steph\SEED Group, Inc. Dropbox\SEED Projects\2023-008 8111-8115 Western Avenue, LA\PDF Images\CWM-R2920171d787a.png APPROVALSignature authorizes Tournesol Siteworksto manufacture the product as shownTamper Resistant StopperCWM-R2920-2K-ADJWater Capacity=20.8 galCWM-R2920-2K-CRTWater Capacity=20.8 galMoisture Sensor (typical)One per systemCWM-2920-Master Unit(Illustrated)2931 3/4CWM-R2920-4K-LINWater Capacity=41.6 galCWM-R2920-3K-LINWater Capacity= 31.2 galBioGuard Root Guard FabricTo cover water inlet portsCWM-R2920-2K-LINWater Capacity=20.8 galCWM-R2920-MSWater Capacity=10.4 galOverflow Drain AdapterIncludes GE Clear Silicone Adhesive With hose barbsList of MaterialsFiller Filler Hose Hose 90 deg OverflowProductCWM-R2920-MSTube Tube (feet) Clamps Elbow DrainTop Bottom1 1 0 0000CWM-R2920-2K-LIN 1 1 3 4CWM-R2920-3K-LIN 1 1 6 8CWM-R2920-4K-LIN 1 1 9 12 0CWM-R2920-2K-CRT 1 1 12 24 8CWM-R2920-2K-ADJ 1 1 3 84CHECKEDDRAWNRudy GalindoQAAPPROVEDMFGSCALESIZEC3/14/2008TITLECWM-R2920-All ProductsDWG NOCWM-R2920-All ProductsSHEET 1 OF 1REVTournesol Siteworks42326 Albrae Street, Fremont, CA 94538(800) 542-228211111Adapter1 Hose BarbsIncluded on all units(except MS)
Filler Tube TopMay be trimmed in fieldFiller Tube BottomMay be trimmed in field2018 1/2 3 P-RE-WES-07
229 of 334

GLENOAKS BOULEVARD
EL= 530.90' (PC)
EL= 528.78' (PC)
EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY
PATIO
L-4.0

GROUND FLOORLIGHTING PLAN
0 feet161/8" 1'-0"824
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 SYMBOLMANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTIONQTYFX Luminaire FR8Die-cast brass and copper construction, straight shroud.2.0" Dia x 7.5" H.Order code: FR, Copper and Brass, (AB) Antique Bronze,3-Prong SpikeLamp: FR-3LED, 4.2W|4.5VA, 2700K, Beamspread: SpotFX Luminaire M-PK78Die-cast aluminum path light with powder-coated finish.2.8" W x 5.3" W x 22.1" H.Order code: M-PK, Aluminum, (BZ) Bronze Metallic,Ground MountLamp: M-PK-3LED, 4.2W|4.5VA, 2700K, Beamspread:Flood

LIGHTING SCHEDULE GROUND LEVEL
230 of 334

24"X84" GURNEY
L-4.1
4TH FLOORLIGHTING PLAN
0 feet161/8" 1'-0"824
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 SYMBOLMANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTIONQTYFX Luminaire A-NK412LIGHTING SCHEDULE 4TH FLOOR 231 of 334

L-4.2

LIGHTING CUT-SHEETS
NOT PUBLISHED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDPROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

CHECKED BYDRAWN BYSCALEDATE
OFSEED GROUP, INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THEACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF REPRODUCTIONSOF THIS DOCUMENT GENERATED BY OTHERS FROMELECTRONIC MEDIA. 10-04-22AS SHOWNSHAARevisions 01-19-23Revisions 07-20-23Revisions 12-08-23Revisions 07-10-24 441-445 W. GLENOAKS BLVD.GLENDALE, CA 91202

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIASIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE 16 232 of 334

L-5.0
NOTES
IRRIGATION NOTES:1.DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY TO CONFORM TO ACTUALFIELD CONDITIONS. EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS ARE FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED,WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITHIN PLANTING AREAS OR LOCATED AS REQUESTED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND INSTALL THE IRRIGATIONSYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IRRIGATION LEGEND, AND AS DESCRIBED IN THESE NOTESAND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES, DETAILS, AND/OR THE MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS. COSTSINCURRED DUE TO ANY ADJUSTMENT, INCLUDING THOSE REQUESTED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, RELATIVETO THE LOCATION OR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THECONTRACTOR.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID AND PRIOR TO COMMENCINGINSTALLATION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST, THEY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.4.THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED BASED ON A MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE AND MAXIMUM GPM DEMAND. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE AT EACH POINT OF CONNECTION PRIOR TO COMMENCINGINSTALLATION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL SERVICES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITYFOR ANY DAMAGE INCURRED DURING HIS WORK.6.PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AN ON SITE CONFERENCE WITH THEOWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TO DISCUSS THE USE OF MATERIALS, INSTALLATION METHODS, AND ANY CLARIFICATIONS.7.THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND MAKE IRRIGATION CONNECTION AT BOTH ELECTRICAL AND WATERSERVICE POINTS AS DESIGNATED BY BOTH THE GENERAL AND PLUMBING CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF THE OVER-ALLPROJECT CONSTRUCTION.8.ALL IN GROUND NON-PRESSURE LINES SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 (MIN. 3/4") WITH PVC SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT-WELD FITTINGS.ALL IN GROUND PRESSURE MAINS SHALL BE SCH. 80 PVC WITH SCH 80 PVC FITTINGS. ALL IN GROUND NON-PRESSURE ANDPRESSURE LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTERS AND LAWN AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.9.THREADED FITTINGS AND RISERS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.10.ALL PIPES UNDER PAVED AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN OVERSIZED PVC SCHEDULE 40 PIPE SLEEVES PRIOR TO PAVING (MINIMUMTWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE IRRIGATION OR ELECTRICAL LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS).11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH ALL IRRIGATION LINES AND ADJUST ALL IRRIGATION HEADS AND DRIPLINE FOR 100% COVERAGEAND TO PREVENT OVERSPRAY ONTO WALKS, WALLS, DRIVEWAYS, AND BUILDING.12.BACKFLOW DEVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND LOCAL PLUMBING CODE.13.IRRIGATION HEADS IN AREAS ADJACENT TO WALKS, CURBS OR OTHER MOUNTABLE HARDSCAPE SHALL BE POP- UPS.14.UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL HIS MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND WASTE AND DEBRIS TOTHE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.15.THE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION SHALL NOT BE DEEMED "COMPLETE" UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS INSTALLED AND ADJUSTED ALLSPRINKLER HEADS, VALVES, DRIPLINE, AND ALL RELATED IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, AND HAS SUBMITTED APPROVED "AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS.16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS, CONFERENCE AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR HISPORTION OF THE WORK.17.RECIRCULATING WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR WATER FEATURES.18.PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICES ARE REQUIRED IF WATER PRESSURE IS BELOW OR EXCEEDS THE RECOMMENDED PRESSURE OFTHE SPECIFIED IRRIGATION DEVICES.19.CHECK VALVES OR ANTI-DRAIN VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL SPRINKLER HEADS WHERE LOW POINT DRAINAGE COULD OCCUR.

LANDSCAPE NOTES:NATURE OF THE PLANS: THE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFYEXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF ANYDISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO START OF WORK.CLEARING AND GRUBBING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL LANDSCAPEIMPROVEMENT AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE. CLEARING ANDGRUBBING OPERATIONS SHALL REMOVE ALL NATURAL AND MAN MADE OBJECTS WITHIN THESOIL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL ROOTS, CLODS AND STONES LARGER THAN 1”GREATEST DIMENSION, POCKETS OF COARSE SAND, NOXIOUS WEEDS, STICKS, BRUSH ANDOTHER LITTER, FOOTINGS, ABANDONED PIPES AND UTILITY LINES, AND CONSTRUCTIONLITTER, ETC. ALL BULKING OF SOIL RESULTING FROM GRUBBING OPERATIONS SHALL BEUNIFORMLY SPREAD AND COMPACTED TO GRADE OR REM0VED FROM THE SITE ASNECESSARY AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. TREES INDICATED "TO REMAIN" SHALLBE PROTECTED IN PLACE BY THE CONTRACTOR.QUANTITIES: PLANT AND MATERIAL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FORCONTRACTOR CONVENIENCE ONLY AND DO NOT LIMIT THE CONTRACTOR TO THOSE SPECIFICQUANTITIES. PRIOR TO BID SUBMITTAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLANT COUNTS ANDFURNISH THE QUANTITIES AS NECESSARY TO DO THE SPECIFIED WORK.TOPSOIL: IN FORMERLY PAVED AREAS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE TOP 18 INCHESAND BACK FILL WITH AN APPROVED CLASS “A” IMPORTED TOP SOIL CAPABLE OF SUSTAININGHEALTHY PLANT LIFE. IT SHALL BE OF A UNIFORM COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE, FERTILEAND FRIABLE SANDY LOAM CONTAINING AN AMOUNT OF ORGANIC MATTER NORMAL TO THEREGION, AND SHALL NOT BE INFESTED WITH NEMATODES OR OTHER UNDESIRABLE INSECTSAND PLANT DISEASE ORGANISMS. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FROM A SOURCE DESIGNATED BY THECONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE THECONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THE QUALITY OF THE TOPSOIL WITH A CERTIFIEDAGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY EVALUATION REPORT. SUBMIT THE EVALUATION REPORT TO THEOWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL 30 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY TOPSOILPURCHASE.SOILS TESTING: TEST SOIL FOUND IN-PLACE IN THE DESIGNATED LANDSCAPE AREAS,INCLUDING SOIL COMPACTED IN PLACE AS PART OF THE EARTHWORK. TEST SAMPLES OFON-SITE SOILS SHALL BE TAKEN UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE OWNER ORTHEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (MAXIMUM OF 2 SAMPLES). SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALLBE ADDED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE SOILS TESTING LABORATORY'S RECOMMENDATION UPONWRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. SOILAMENDMENTS SPECIFIED ARE A REQUIRED MINIMUM FOR BIDDING PURPOSES AND SHALL BEMODIFIED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE SOILS TEST WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS. ALONG WITHSOIL TEST SAMPLES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE TESTING LABORATORY A COPYOF THE PLANT LIST.FINISHED GRADES: SHALL BE I” BELOW TOP OF SURROUNDING HARD SURFACES FOR GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND 2” IN LAWN AREAS.SOIL PREPARATIONCROSS RIP SOILS AT LEAST 1 FOOT DEEP ON 12 INCH CENTERS.AMEND ALL PLANTING ZONES. PREPARE PLANTING PITS AT LEAST TWICE AS WIDE AS THEROOTBALLS.GENERAL SOIL PREPARATION ON A SQUARE FOOT BASIS. BROADCAST THE FOLLOWINGUNIFORMLY; RATES ARE PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET FOR A 6-INCH LIFT. INCORPORATE THEMHOMOGENEOUSLY 6" DEEP.·AMMONIUM SULFATE (21-0-0) - 5 POUNDS·POTASSIUM SULFATE (0-0-50) - 8 POUNDS·TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE (0-45-0) - 4 POUNDS·AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM - 20 POUNDS·ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT - ABOUT 3 CUBIC YARDS, SUFFICIENT FOR 3% TO 5% SOILORGANIC MATTER ON A DRY WEIGHT BASISFOR THE PREPARATION ON A VOLUME BASIS, HOMOGENEOUSLY BLEND THE FOLLOWINGMATERIALS INTO THE SOIL. RATES ARE EXPRESSED PER CUBIC YARD:·AMMONIUM SULFATE (21-0-0) - 1/4 POUND·POTASSIUM SULFATE (0-0-50) - 1/3 POUND·TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE (0-45-0) - 1/4 POUND·AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM - 1 POUND·ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT - ABOUT 15% BY VOLUME, SUFFICIENT FOR 3% TO 5% SOILORGANIC MATTER ON A DRY WEIGHT BASISORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT:1.HUMUS MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN ACID-SOLUBLE ASH CONTENT OF NO LESS THAN 6%AND NO MORE THAN 20%. ORGANIC MATTER SHALL BE AT LEAST 50% ON A DRY WEIGHTBASIS.2.THE PH OF THE MATERIAL SHALL BE BETWEEN 6 AND 7.5.3.THE SALT CONTENT SHALL BE LESS THAN 10 MILLIMHO/CM @ 25° C. ON A SATURATEDPASTE EXTRACT.4.BORON CONTENT OF THE SATURATED EXTRACT SHALL BE LESS THAN 1.0 PART PERMILLION.5.SILICON CONTENT (ACID-INSOLUBLE ASH) SHALL BE LESS THAN 50%.6.CALCIUM CARBONATE SHALL NOT BE PRESENT IF TO BE APPLIED ON ALKALINE SOILS.7.TYPES OF ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS ARE COMPOSTS, MANURES, MUSHROOM COMPOSTS,STRAW, ALFALFA, PEAT MOSSES ETC. LOW IN SALTS, LOW IN HEAVY METALS, FREE FROMWEED SEEDS, FREE OF PATHOGENS AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS.8.COMPOSTED WOOD PRODUCTS ARE CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE [STABLE HUMUSMUST BE PRESENT]. WOOD BASED PRODUCTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE WHICH ARE BASEDON RED WOOD OR CEDAR.9.SLUDGE-BASED MATERIALS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.10.CARBON:NITROGEN RATIO IS LESS THAN 25:1.11.THE COMPOST SHALL BE AEROBIC WITHOUT MALODOROUS PRESENCE OFDECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS.12.THE MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE SHALL BE 0.5 INCH, 80% OR MORE SHALL PASS A NO. 4SCREEN FOR SOIL AMENDING.

MAXIMUM TOTAL PERMISSIBLE POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS IN AMENDMENT IN PARTSPER MILLION ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS:ARSENIC12 COPPER100SELENIUM20CADMIUM15 LEAD200SILVER10CHROMIUM300 MERCURY10VANADIUM50COBALT50 MOLYBDENUM20ZINC300NICKEL100HIGHER AMOUNTS OF SALINITY OR BORON MAY BE PRESENT IF THE SOILS ARE TO BEPRE-LEACHED TO REDUCE THE EXCESS OR IF THE PLANT SPECIES WILL TOLERATE THESALINITY AND/OR BORON.IRRIGATE DEEPLY TO HELP LOWER ALKALINITY AND SODIUM. BALANCE SOIL MOISTURE WITHSOIL AERATION. WHEN THE ALKALINITY AND SODIUM ARE LOWER, DO NOT OVER LEACH ANDREMOVE ESSENTIAL MINERALS.FOR SITE MAINTENANCE, APPLY AMMONIUM SULFATE (21-0-0) AT 5 POUNDS PER 1,000 SQUAREFEET ABOUT ONCE PER QUARTER. MONITOR THE SITE WITH PERIODIC SOIL TESTING. ADJUSTTHE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM AS NEEDED.PLANT MATERIALS: PROVIDE PLANTS OF THE SPECIES, KINDS, SIZES, AND SPACING, ETC., ASNOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. PLANTS SHALL BE SYMMETRICAL, TYPICAL FOR VARIETY ANDSPECIES, SOUND, HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, FREE FROM PLANT DISEASE, INSECT PESTS OR THEIREGGS, AND SHALL HAVE HEALTHY, NORMAL ROOT SYSTEMS, WELL FILLING THEIRCONTAINERS, BUT NOT TO THE POINT OF BEING ROOT BOUND.MULCH: INSTALL 3” OF SHREDDED FIR OR CEDAR BARK (WALK-ON) IN ALL PLANTING AREASEXCEPT TURF/LAWN AREAS AND STREET TREEWELLS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THEPLANS.APPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES: AFTER FINISH GRADING AND IMMEDIATELYAFTER PLANTING TREAT ALL NON-SEEDED PLANTING AREAS WITH A PRE-EMERGENT WEEDAND GRASS SEED CONTROL AGENT; APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS, (DYMID, EPTAM, BETASAN).PLANT MAINTENANCE PERIOD: UPON COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING OPERATIONS, THECONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST A PRE-MAINTENANCE FINAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. UPON ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMMENCE A MAINTENANCE PERIOD OF 90CALENDAR DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.A.KEEP ALL PLANTED AREAS FREE OF DEBRIS, WEEDS AND CULTIVATED AT INTERVALS NOTTO EXCEED 10 DAYS.B.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY AN 8-8-4 COMMERCIAL SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER TOALL PLANTING AREAS AT THE RATE OF 30 POUNDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET UPONCOMPLETION OF THE GROUND COVER PLANTING AND AT 30-DAY INTERVALS THEREAFTERUNTIL THE END OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTINGAREAS FOLLOWING THE APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER.C.REPLACE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE PLANTS THAT SHOW SIGNS OF FAILURE TO GROW ATANY TIME DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD OR THOSE PLANTS SO INJURED OR DAMAGEDSO AS TO RENDER THEM UNSUITABLE FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. PROVIDEREPLACEMENT PLANTS OF THE SAME TYPE AND SIZE TO MATCH ADJACENT LIKE PLANTS.FURNISH PLANT MATERIAL AND FERTILIZER AS SPECIFIED AND SUBJECT TO A 30 DAYESTABLISHMENT PERIOD AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.D.UPON COMPLETION OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE APOST-MAINTENANCE FINAL INSPECTION WITH THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE. SHOULD THE SITE BE IN A CONDITION THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE TO THEOWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, THE TERMS OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD MAYBE EXTENDED UNTIL THE CONDITION OF THE LANDSCAPE WORK IS SATISFACTORY. FINALPAYMENT WILL BE WITH HELD, UNTIL ALL WORK IS SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED.E.WHEN LAWN HAS BEEN SPECIFIED PERFORM THE FIRST MOWING OF LAWN AREAS WHENTHE GRASS IS 2- ½ INCHES HIGH AND REPEAT AS OFTEN AS IS NECESSARY TO MAINTAINTHE LAWN AT A HEIGHT OF 2-INCHES. IN NO CASE SHALL THE LAWN BE CUT LOWER THAN1-1/2-INCHES IN HEIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.F.GUARANTEES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANT ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONEYEAR FROM DATE OF THE FINAL POST-MAINTENANCE INSPECTION ACCEPTANCE. ALLPALMS SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS, ALL TREES SHALL BEWARRANTED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AND ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR APERIOD OF 6 MONTHS. THE WARRANTY DOES NOT INCLUDE ITEMS DAMAGED DUE TOOWNER NEGLECT OR ACTS OF GOD.

PROJECT NUMBERSHEET NUMBER

SHEET DESCRIPTION

REVISIONS/PLAN LOG

PROJECT AND CLIENT NAME

LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIGNATURE11-30-2025RENEWAL DATEDATE
16 WATER CONSERVATION NOTESTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 3660 SFWATER TYPE: POTABLEI AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT ACOMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE.SIGNATURE_____________________________________________ DATE: 11-08-22RECIRCULATING WATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR WATER FEATURESA MINIMUM 3-INCH LAYER OF MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL SURFACE OF PLANTING AREASEXCEPT TURF AREAS, CREEPING OR ROOTING GROUNDCOVERS, OR DIRECT SEEDING APPLICATION WHERE MULCHIS CONTRAINDICATED.FOR SOILS LESS THAN 6% ORGANIC MATTER IN THE TOP 6 INCHES OF SOIL, COMPOST AT A RATE OF A MINIMUM OFFOUR CUBIC YARDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF PERMEABLE AREA SHALL BE INCORPORATED TO A DEPTH OF SIXINCHES INTO THE SOIL.I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATERIN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS.SIGNATURE_____________________________________________ DATE: 11-08-22A DIAGRAM OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWING HYDROZONES SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLERFOR SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION SHALL BE FILLED OUT AND CERTIFIED BY EITHER THE SIGNER OF THE LANDSCAPEPLANS, THE SIGNER OF THE IRRIGATION PLANS, OR THE LICENSED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROJECT.AN IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION. 233 of 334

MSB
SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM1
E-2.0
AS SHOWNLOAD CALCS.DIAGRAM &SINGLE LINE
MMS

SHEET TITLE
4240DATE:DRAWING NO.

SCALE: 07-12-24BY:MDCHECKED:HRA
PROJECT43-UNIT MULTI RESIDENTIAL BUILDING441-445 GLENOAKS AVE.GLENDALE, CA 91202 ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY ABRARI AND ASSOCIATES AND WERE CREATED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF THE IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF ABRARI AND ASSOCIATES INC.

REV.DATEABCD

DESCRIPTIONXXBY
RDEXP. 03-31-26OENO. 13294ETESRELAT STIEGMIAHDERP

EIALCFAOFIICTCRLARNERGNE
OSEFSIAR.RBARI NAOLIN
PROJECT NO.:

DATE SIGNED:07-12-24
ABRARI
1713 STANDARD AVE. GLENDALE, CA 91201 W 818.956.1900 [email protected]

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES
PLUMB CHKDX LID CHKDDATEBYMECH CHKDXXXXX CUST. OK'DXX
MSEV
M

M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M

M M M M M
MSA

M M M M M M M M MSA

M M M M M M M M M M
234 of 334

PANELSCHEDULESNONE
E-2.1

SHEET TITLE
4240DATE:DRAWING NO.

REV.DATEABCD

DESCRIPTIONXXBY
RDEXP. 03-31-26OENO. 13294ETESRELAT STIEGMIAHDERP

EIALCFAOFIICTCRLARNERGNE
OSEFSIAR.RBARI NAOLIN
PROJECT NO.:

DATE SIGNED:07-12-24
ABRARI
1713 STANDARD AVE. GLENDALE, CA 91201 W 818.956.1900 [email protected]

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES
PLUMB CHKDX LID CHKDDATEBYMECH CHKDXXXXX CUST. OK'DXX
SERVICE EQUIPMENT ELEVATION2
235 of 334

EL= 530.90' (PC) EL= 529.12' (PC)
EL= 527.83' (PC)
24"X84" GURNEY

NO PARKING
B-B
C-C
PARKING LEVEL 1 ELECTRICAL PLAN1
E-4.1
1/8"=1'-0"

SITEELECTRICALPLAN

SHEET TITLE
4240DATE:DRAWING NO.

REV.DATEABCD

DESCRIPTIONXXBY
RDEXP. 03-31-26OENO. 13294ETESRELAT STIEGMIAHDERP

EIALCFAOFIICTCRLARNERGNE
OSEFSIAR.RBARI NAOLIN
PROJECT NO.:

DATE SIGNED:07-12-24
ABRARI
1713 STANDARD AVE. GLENDALE, CA 91201 W 818.956.1900 [email protected]

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES
PLUMB CHKDX LID CHKDDATEBYMECH CHKDXXXXX CUST. OK'DXX
236 of 334

De
nsity Bonus Housing Plan
441
-445 West Glenoaks
Glendale, California, 91205
July 22, 2025
BOLADarck Design
c/o Jean-Pierre Boldian
408 South Pasadena Avenue, #6
Pasadena, CA 91105
City of Glendale
Community Development Department
Housing Division
141 North Glendale Avenue, Room 202
Glendale, CA 91206
EXHIBIT 3
237 of 334

Number of Dwelling Units Proposed: Jean-Pierre Boladian (“Applicant”) development of a 17,101 square foot density bonus new construction, rental housing project totaling forty-three (43) multi-family residential dwelling units (the “Project”). The Project is requesting to provide a total of nine (9) affordable units consisting of very low (6 units) and moderate (3 units) income households. Maximum Number of Units Permitted per Glendale Municipal Code (‘GMC”): The Project is located in the R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone. The Project site (APNs collectively: 5636-004-022 & 5636-004-023) has a lot area of 17,101 square feet and consists of one hundred (100) feet of frontage. Sites zoned R-1250 with more than ninety (90) feet of frontage are permitted one (1) unit per 1,000 square feet, which permits a maximum base density eighteen (18) units (17,101 / 1,000 = 17.10 rounded up to 18). Replacement Unit Obligation under the Density Bonus Requirement: Per State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq.), an applicant is ineligible for a density bonus or any other incentives or concessions if a project is proposed on a parcel or parcels with rental dwelling units that have been vacated or demolished within a five (5)-year period preceding the project’s development application or have been occupied by lower or very low income households, unless the proposed project replaces those units. Pursuant to CA Govt Code § 65915, if any dwelling units are occupied on the date of a project’s development application, the proposed project is required to provide the same number of units of equivalent size (i.e., the same total number of bedrooms as the units being replaced) as affordable to the same or lower income households in occupancy. If the incomes are unknown to the applicant, there is an established rebuttable presumption per HUD’s Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy database. Using the most recent data (2017-2021) for Extremely Low, Very Low, and Low Renter households on https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html and dividing the total households from those three categories (30,270 households) by the total renters within the City of Glendale (48,575 households), this presumption amounts to 62.32% (30,270 / 48,575 = 62.32%) of renter households at or below 80% AMI. Per the Los Angeles County Assessor, there are currently eight (8) existing residential dwelling units at nine (9) bedrooms total. The Project is subject to the 62.32% presumption set forward by HUD. By applying the rebuttable presumption of 62.32% to the eight (8) residential dwelling units and nine (9) bedrooms, five (5) replacement units (62.32% x 8 = 4.99 rounded up to 5) at 6 bedrooms total (62.32% x 9 = 5.61 rounded up to 6) are required under State Density Bonus Law. The Project is required to provide six (6) bedrooms through the requirement to provide six (6) affordable units to very low income households under Glendale Municipal Code (“GMC”) Chapter 30.36 and CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq. As such, Applicant has met the replacement obligation, and no additional units are required. Number of Affordable Units meeting Density Bonus and Discretionary Bonus Requirement: Applicant is required to designate six (6) units as affordable to very low income households and three (3) units as affordable to moderate income households per GMC 30.36 and CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq. The affordable units were selected pursuant to the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Zoning Implementation Policies. The preliminary selected affordable units are detailed in Project floorplans attached hereto as Attachment 1, as well as immediately below: Unit Number Square Footage Bedroom(s) Bathroom(s) Affordability 102 612 1 1 Very-Low 106 550 Studio 1 Very-Low 238 of 334

107 506 Studio 1 Very-Low 203 598 1 1 Moderate 208 550 Studio 1 Very-Low 209 605 Studio 1 Moderate 301 608 1 1 Moderate 306 550 Studio 1 Very-Low 307 506 Studio 1 Very-Low Amount of Density Bonus and Discretionary Bonus Requested: Applicant is entitled to a 50% density bonus by providing 3 very low-income units (16% of the base density of 18 = 2.88 rounded up to 3). State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq.) allows up to an automatic 50% density bonus (18 base density x 50% = 27 total units) and 4 incentives in exchange for the provision of at least 16% of the base units restricted as rentals for very low-income households. Additionally, Applicant is entitled to an additional 50% Density Bonus by designating 3 units to moderate income households (18 base density x 15% = 2.7 rounded up to 3 units). Applicant is requesting a 100% density bonus and is requesting to provide 3 units to very low-income households and 3 units to moderate income households. This request complies with State Density Bonus Law, which allows up to a 100% maximum density bonus, as well as four incentives in exchange for the provision of setting aside 16% of the total base units to very low-income households and 15% of the total base units to moderate income households. Applicant is also requesting a discretionary bonus of thirty-eight point nine percent (38.9%). Applicant’s request complies with State Density Bonus Law, as there is a positive correlation and proportionality between the requested density bonus and the number of very low income units to be provided, and State Density Bonus Law allows the City to grant a discretionary density bonus above the maximum allowed by State Density Bonus Law, (CA Govt Code § 65915(n)). However, since Applicant’s request for the grant of a density bonus is greater than the maximum under State Density Bonus Law, pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, it is subject to City Council approval following a public hearing. Per Urgency Ordinance No. 5966, the City Council is the reviewing and approving body for any density. Number and Description of Incentives and Concessions Requested: By setting aside sixteen percent (16%) of the base density to very-low income households, Applicant is entitled to four (4) concessions. Pursuant to GMC 30.36.070A, Applicant has requested four (4) concessions: (1) Increase the maximum allowed building height and stories; (2) Increase the maximum allowed floor area ratio (FAR); (3) Reduce common open space; and (4) Not be subject to the requirement to provide additional open space for additional density gained by having a lot width greater than 90 feet wide Applicant has also requested five (5) waivers: 1) Reduce minimum required dwelling unit size for efficiency (studio) and one bedroom units; 2) Increase the maximum allowed lot coverage; 3) Reduce minimum and average interior (east) setback; 4) Reduce minimum and average interior (west) setback; and 5) Reduce minimum required common landscaped open space 239 of 334

Amount of Parking Concessions Requested: Applicant has requested an automatic parking concession under CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(2)(A), which provides that upon the request of an applicant and approval through the Planning Division, the required vehicle parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, is not to exceed one-half (0.5) space per unit of a development providing at least eleven percent (11%) very-low income units located within one-half (0.5) mile of a major transit stop with unobstructed access. The parking concession per CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(2)(A) would amount to a minimum of twenty-two (22) residential parking spaces (43 units x 0.5 = 21.5 rounded up to 22). The Project exceeds the minimum requirement per CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(2)(A) and proposes to provide twenty-nine (29) parking spaces total. Accordingly, the Project meets and exceeds the parking requirements under CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(2)(A), subject to approval from the Planning Division. Child Care Space: Not applicable. Inclusionary Housing Requirement: GMC Chapter 30.35, the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (the “IZO”), requires a housing development (a rental development project of eight (8) or more dwelling units proposed to be constructed in the City) to provide fifteen percent (15%) of the units as affordable to low-income households. The Project is subject to the IZO. The Project is required to provide three (3) affordable units to low income households (15 percent of 18 base density units (2.7 rounded up to 3). Therefore, the Project will meet and exceed the IZO requirement through the provision of six (6) affordable units to very low income households. No additional affordable units are required under the IZO. Affordable Housing Commercial Development Impact Fee: On May 7, 2019, the City adopted a Citywide Affordable Housing Commercial Development Impact Fee, Ordinance No. 5929, codified at GMC 4.11 (collectively, the “CDIF”). The CDIF became effective after a 60-day period on July 7, 2019. With the exception of hotels, auto dealerships, community land uses which serve the public, and the reconstruction of any building destroyed by fire, flood, earthquake or other act of nature (so long as the square footage does not exceed the square footage before the loss), the CDIF imposes a $4 per square foot fee (per the FY 2020-2021 Citywide Fee Schedule) on all commercial development projects with a gross floor area exceeding 1,250 square feet. The Project is not subject to the CDIF as it does not entail a permitted commercial component. Note About Required Condition: The Project is conditioned on Applicant complying with CA Govt Code § 66300 (d)(2)(C) and (D). 240 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXHIBIT 4
241 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

11.45 11.88
1 7947 SF
46 26
6526 SF
45 3071 SF
44 25
5484 SF
43 5940 SF
2441 POR
7407 SF
23 40 6110 SF
39 7694 SF
22 38 9498 SF
2137 8706 SF
179.20
2035
4163 SF
36 21
4 7791 SF
22 5
8299 SF
23 6
8808 SF
24 7
9316 SF
25 8
9824 SF
26 9
10333 SF
27 10
10841 SF
28 11
11350 SF
87 14
12640±SF
30 32
34069 SF
86 560±SF
15 16 17
33 21440±SF
12645 SF
191
6305 SF
203
11580±SF
2 POR
POR
82 1
83 2
84 3
85 41
SHEET 3
87 6
88 7
89 891
10 1
SHEET 6
92 11
93 12
94 131
97 18
98 SHEETS 4 & 5
POR
50 GLENOAKS
VARIES
BLVD
VARIES
C-TRACT NO 63021
MB 1350-99-100
C-TR NO 51889MB 1210-98-99
C-TRACT NO 37378
MB 965-56-57
C-TRACT NO 48478
MB 1200-94-97
DRYDEN60
ST 60

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03
S
441-445 W GLENOAKS
242 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202
441-445 W GLENOAKS

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03
S

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
243 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202
441-445 W GLENOAKS

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03
S

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
244 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202
441-445 W GLENOAKS

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03
S

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
245 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202

VICINITY & PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY
246 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202VICINITY AND PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY SCALE : 1”=100

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03 S

SUBJECT PROPERTY
300 FEET300 FEET
247 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202VICINITY AND PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY SCALE : 1”=100

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03 S

SUBJECT PROPERTY
300 FEET300 FEET
248 of 334

441-445 W GLENOAKS BLVD, GLENDALE, CA 91202VICINITY AND PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY SCALE : 1”=100

16.12 194.95
70 8.36

39.13 17
144.39
145
145

23.46 R=15
141.21
150.76

22.92 34.06
R=25
12 12
" " " " " " 48.23
247.01
S 1°41'W N 1°41'E
B B
270.07
N 1°41'E S 1°41'W
23 S 1°41'W

97.49 71.83

74.91 23.51
N 79° 45'E

79.02B
B
B
B

PACIFIC AVE
60 60

SAN RAFAEL
AVE
60 60

COLUMBUS
AVE
DRYDEN ST60
60 PG
17 PG
5 PG
3 PG
7 PG
8 60
TR
NO
329
M B 14 89-
726
187
CASA

VERDUGO
VILLA
TR
M B 9
110
-
TRACT
NO
M B 15
-
186
-
TRACT
NO
5451
M B 59 9-
N 88°19'W

50.85 SHEET 2
1 (94
132.67 C-TRACT NO 75012
MB 1426-49-51
6854 SF
123.37

50.85 297.75
281.60
258.19
253.32
247.62
236.07 246.92225.25214.44203.62
70 192.81
190.99
155.35
181.99
145.65
171.18
169.06
123.49
145
119.35
141.65
105.10128.90
100
100
100.01

96.73 144.49

86.83 96.11
160.36
100
145

79.20 34.36

87.33 101.70

43.19 68.96
50 46.15
"
"
50 60
60 "

76.28 58
145
42 50
50 44.31
50 "
"
50 "
50 50.85
"
50 "
50 "
50 50.01

48.23 "50

50.85 100.03
50 47"

48.71 ""
"
""47
"
"

44.32 50

43.19 "
"
145.42
130.10
50 30
50 50.85
"
50 27.59
145
"
33 27

50.01 76.28

20.89 SHEET 1
P. A. TRA REVISED OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR

SEARCH NO

MAPPING AND GIS

SERVICES
SCALE 1" = 100'
5636 4 40455636 - 4, 5 & 6 2007020702001001-03
2007020702001002-03
q
2008100105003001-03
2008121610006001-03
2021050302005001-03 S

SUBJECT PROPERTY
300 FEET300 FEET
249 of 334

1 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105
TEL: (626) 381-9677
July 16, 2025

LETTER OF INTENT
Project Address: 441-445 W Glenoaks Blvd.

Dear Ms. Toledo,
I am writing this letter to share the findings related to the application for the proposed new development at 441-445 W Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 9102. The project consists of forty- three (43) multi-family rental apartment units, including nine (9) affordable set-aside units.

This letter is an amendment to the previously submitted letter on January 16, 2025, and is structured in four parts as follows:

Introduction: Project Site and Existing Building
Part A: Density Bonus Information
Part B: Concessions Summary and Findings
Part C: Waivers Summary and Findings
The structured letter outlines the density bonus component of the project and provides corresponding findings for the requested concessions and waivers.

If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact me directly.

Sincerely,
Farnoosh Farmer
Farnoosh Farmer, Assoc. AIA.

Associate Partner
BOLADarck Design Corp.
[email protected]
626.381.9677
EXHIBIT 5
250 of 334

2 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

INTRODUCTION: PROJECT SITE AND EXISTING BUILDING
The project site is located on the north side of West Glenoaks Boulevard and consists of two contiguous lots with a relatively flat topography. The site currently features two multi-family residential buildings with eight units and detached carports, all originally built in 1942. These structures will be demolished to prepare the site for the new development.

The property has no associations with events or people significant in history and does not serve as a distinctive or exemplary representative of its architectural style, type, or period.

The property therefore does not meet any criteria for listing on any National, State, or local register for historic resources, and is not considered a historic resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

PART A: DENSITY BONUS INFORMATION
Lot Area: ± 17,100.81 SF
Maximum Number of Units Permitted by Zone: 18 Base Units Number of Additional Units Requested: 25 (25/18 = 138.9% increase) Total Number of Units Proposed: 43 (25 + 18)
Unit Type: Rental
Number of Affordable Units Provided: 9
Percentage of Affordable Units Provided: 9 affordable / 18 base units = 50% Level of Affordability:
• Very Low-Income Households 6
• Moderate-Income Households 3
Requested Concessions: (4 total)
• Height and story
• Floor area ratio
• Common open space
• Additional open space

Are parking concessions requested? Yes (per Density Bonus Law) Child-care facility proposed with the project? No
Project within ½ mile of a major transit stop Yes
Present use of property Residential
Number of existing units on site 8
Number of existing low-income units on site None

Requested Waivers: (5 total) Yes
• Minimum unit size
• Lot coverage
• Interior East setback
• Interior West setback
• Permanent Landscaped Open Space
251 of 334

3 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

The applicant is seeking approval of incentives and concessions pursuant to Government Code 65915 and GMC Section 30.36-Density Bonus Incentives of the Glendale Municipal Code.

The requested incentives or concessions are essential for the feasibility of this proposed project to provide affordable rent.

The code allows for incentives, waivers and/or modification for projects that provide residential rental units designated for very low-income and moderate-income households.

This project proposes to provide 138.9% of the maximum permitted units and qualifies for four incentives.

• Number of Dwelling Units Proposed:

The proposed project involves the construction of a new four (4) story, forty-three (43) multi- family rental apartment units (including six (6) very low-income and three (3) moderate- income households). The project consists of nineteen (19) studio and one bath units and twenty-four (24) one bedroom and one bath units. Parking is provided within a semi- subterranean garage, with a total of twenty-nine (29) parking spaces.

• Maximum Number of Units Permitted per Zoning Code:

This proposed project consists of two lots at 441-445 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202, and is in the R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone. The Glendale City Zoning code permits a maximum density of one dwelling unit for each one thousand (1000) square feet of site area for parcels with a width more than 90 ft. Based on the size of the project site, seventeen thousand and one hundred and eighty-one hundredths (17,100.81) square feet, a total of seventeen (17) units would be allowed if density bonus is not requested. With the requested density bonus, the base number of units in the project will be eighteen (18) units after rounding up.

• Number of Affordable Units meeting Density Bonus Requirement:

The project applicant is proposing to provide nine (9) affordable residential dwelling units (very low and moderate affordable level), which is fifty (50) percent of the maximum number of units permitted per the Zoning Code (when rounded up per GMC §30.36.050.C).

• Amount of Density Bonus Requested:

The proposed project is seeking a one-hundred thirty-eight point nine (138.9 %) percent bonus density units and will be providing a proportionate number of restricted units, calculated as six (6) very low-income units and three (3) moderate-income units. State Density Bonus Law (CA Govt Code § 65915, et seq.) allows up to an automatic one hundred percent (100%) density bonus. Providing twenty-one (21) percent very-low and moderate affordable residential dwelling units allows the project applicant to request a maximum of one-hundred thirty-eight point nine (138.9 %) percent bonus density units. The additional eight (25) units 252 of 334

4 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

above what the Zoning Code allows (maximum eighteen (18) units when rounded up) (§30.36.050-C) allows for four (4) Incentives.

A total of 43 units are proposed for this project, including six (6) very low-income and three (3) moderate-income affordable units, which are as follows:

PART B: CONCESSIONS SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
• REQUESTED CONSESSIONS:

The applicant is requesting the following (4) concessions:

1. Height and Story Increase from 36 ft maximum height (3 stories) to 47 ft (4 stories).

2. Floor Area Ratio Increase from 1.2 in the R-1250 Zone to 2.2.

3. Common Open Space Decrease from 7,700 sf required area (200 sf per the first 25 dwelling units and 150 sf per the additional second 25 dwelling units) to 4,210.4 sf.

4. Additional Open Space Decrease from 980 sf required area to none. • REQUIRED FINDINGS OF FACT (per Glendale Municipal Code Title 30, Chapter

30.36.080):

1. Describe how the incentive or concession results in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs or to provide affordable rents:

Height, FAR, and Density:

Providing the additional height, buildable area, and total proposed unit count would allow for the thirty-four (34) market rate units to offset the cost and financially support construction and operation costs, to set aside the nine (9) affordable units. The additional density and FLOOR
LEVEL
UNIT
NUMBER

UNIT TYPE AREA
(S.F.)

INCOME LEVEL
STUDIO 1-BEDROOM VERY-LOW MODERATE
1ST
FLOOR
102 611.8
105 520.6
107 505.5
2ND
FLOOR
203 598.1
208 550.1
209 604.7
3RD
FLOOR
301 608.1
306 550.1
307 505.5
TOTAL 9 UNITS 6 3 5,054.5 6 VERY-LOW 3 MODERATE
253 of 334

5 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

increase in floor area will provide the additional housing units that will financially support the designated affordable units for very low and moderate-income households.

Common Open Space and Additional Open Space:

Reducing requirements of Common Open Space and Additional Open Space directly translates into cost savings that can be redirected to support affordable housing development and improve the financial viability of providing affordable housing. With less space allocated for open areas, the applicant can use the freed-up land to build more units. This increase in the buildable area allows for a higher unit count, which can generate more revenue from market-rate units. The additional income from these units can offset the cost of setting aside units for affordable housing.

2. Describe how the incentive or concession will not have a “specific adverse impact upon public health and safety,” as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, or the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact without rendering the housing development unaffordable to low-income and moderate-income households. As used herein, “specific adverse impact upon public health or safety” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or the land use designation in the general plan shall not constitute a specific, adverse impact upon public health or safety:

The proposed development requests comply with all zoning codes and adhere to design guidelines that are compatible with and appropriate for the adjacent buildings and site context. The project is enabled through the use of the State Density Bonus specifically under Assembly Bill - AB2345, AB1287, and General Plan Update to meet Glendale City’s Housing Element.

The requested concessions do not include reductions to any standards of any state or local Building and Safety Division (Community Development Department), Fire Department or Engineering Division (Public Works Department) requirements or any other objective, identifiable written requirements pertaining to health and safety.

The proposed project meets the requirements to qualify for a Class 32 “In-fill” Development Project and is exempt from further CEQA review.

The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Housing Element to provide affordable housing by allowing developers density bonuses or other financial incentives for providing units for very low-income and moderate-income residents.

254 of 334

6 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

3. Describe how the incentive or concession will not be contrary to state or federal law.

The granting of an incentive or concession shall not require or be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment, zoning change, study, or other discretionary approval. For purposes of this subdivision, “study” does not include reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for the concession or incentive or to demonstrate that the incentive or concession meets the definition:

Height and Story:

The project is requesting a height increase, including the addition of one additional story. This proposed scale aligns with the existing character of the street and surrounding neighborhood.

The area is predominantly residential, with a mix of one-, two-, and three-story buildings nearby, as well as some commercial uses along North Pacific Avenue. Directly across from the project site is a three-story medical office building (Kaiser Permanente), further supporting the appropriateness of the requested height increase within the context of the neighborhood.

Pursuant to GMC §30.11.020 Table 30.11 B, a maximum of three (3) stories and thirty-six (36) foot building height are allowed for properties in R-1250 zone. As proposed, the project applicant is requesting to increase the building height by ten feet and nine inches (11’) up to forty-seven feet (47’) and number of stories to four (4). The requested concessions would enable accommodation of the increased density.

This requested height increase concession will not require a general plan amendment, or zoning change. California Government Code Chapter 4.3. allows for adjustments to development standards for eligible developments. Granting this height incentive or concession will not be contrary to state or federal law. The requested height increase is consistent with the existing development patterns and does not conflict with any legal requirements.

Floor Area Ratio:

The proposed project is requesting a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) concession to exceed the standard FAR limitations set forth by the local zoning regulations. This adjustment is necessary to accommodate the additional density and provide the required affordable housing units.

Pursuant to GMC §30.11.020 Table 30.11 B, the maximum allowed FAR for properties located in R-1250 zone is 1.2. As proposed, the project applicant is requesting to increase FAR to 2.2.

The requested concessions would enable accommodation of the increased density.

This requested FAR concession will not require a general plan amendment, or zoning change.

The increased FAR is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood context, which includes a mix of residential and commercial developments of varying scales. Additionally, the requested FAR adjustment is consistent with the goals of the Density Bonus Law to incentivize the development of affordable housing and meet community housing needs. 255 of 334

7 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

California Government Code Chapter 4.3. allows for adjustments to development standards for eligible developments. Granting this FAR concession will not be contrary to state or federal law and will not undermine the health, safety, or welfare of the community. It will facilitate the financial feasibility of the project while ensuring that the additional units provided are affordable and meet the needs of the targeted income groups.

Common Open Space and Additional Open Space:

The proposed project is requesting a concession for a reduction in the required Common Open Space and Additional Open Space. This adjustment is necessary to accommodate the additional density and ensure the inclusion of affordable housing units within the project.

Reducing the required common open space allows for the more efficient use of the available land and contributes to the overall financial feasibility of the project.

This requested Setback concession will not require a general plan amendment or zoning change. The request is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood context, which includes a mix of residential and commercial developments of varying scales. Additionally, the requested setback adjustment is consistent with the goals of the Density Bonus Law to incentivize the development of affordable housing and meet community housing needs.

California Government Code Chapter 4.3. allows for adjustments to development standards for eligible developments. Granting this concession will not require a general plan amendment, or zoning change. Additionally, the reduction will not compromise the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and it will not be contrary to state or federal law.

PART C: WAIVERS SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
• REQUESTED WAIVERS:

1. Unit Size
Requested: Minimum 500 square feet
Required: Minimum 600 square feet

2. Lot Coverage
Requested: Maximum 53.45%
Required: Maximum 50%

3. Interior Setback (East)
Requested: Minimum 5’-6’ – Average 9’-9”
Required: Minimum 8’-0” and 11-0” – Average 11’-0” and 14’-0”

4. Interior Setback (West)
Requested: Minimum 7’-9’
Required: Minimum 8’-0” and 11’-0”

5. Permanent Landscaped Open Space
Requested: 8.4% of lot area (1,780 square feet)
Required: Minimum 25% of lot area (4,275.2 square feet) 256 of 334

8 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

• REQUIRED / MANDATED FINDINGS
Pursuant to GMC Section 30.36.080(B), the Director of Community Development shall grant the request for waivers or reductions in development standards pursuant to this section only if he or she makes all of the following written findings:

1. Describe how the application of said development standard(s) will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the housing development at the density and with the incentives or concessions granted pursuant to this chapter:

This finding can be made for each requested waiver as follows:

Reduction in Minimum Unit Size: To make the project physically feasible, the applicant seeks waiver from requirements of GMC §30.11.050 A to reduce the minimum six hundred (600) square feet unit area to five hundred (500) square feet. The project is designed to optimize density to provide nine (9) units affordable to very low-income and moderate-income households and provide for a balanced unit mix to serve a variety of income levels. The requested waiver from the minimum 600 square feet unit size is needed to allow for the construction of the additional density and affordable units as well as balancing unit mix physically possible to build. The waiver will allow relief to provide affordable units and the more balanced unit mix that will meet the design of the proposed development project. The requirements of GMC §30.11.050 A would physically preclude the construction of housing with the eight (9) affordable units and balanced unit mix at the density and with the incentives or concessions.

Increase in Lot Coverage: As proposed, the project applicant is requesting to increase lot coverage to fifty-three-point forty five (53.45) percent. Pursuant to GMC §30.11.030 Table

30.11-B, the maximum allowed lor coverage for properties located in R-1250 zone is fifty (50) percent of the lot size. The project is designed to optimize density to provide nine (9) units affordable to very low-income and moderate-income households and provide for a balanced unit mix to serve a variety of income levels. The requested waiver from the maximum 50% lot coverage is needed to allow for the construction of the additional density and affordable units as well as balancing unit mix physically possible to build. The waiver will allow relief to provide affordable units and the more balanced unit mix that will meet the design of the proposed development project. The requirements of GMC §30.11.030 Table 30.11-B would physically preclude the construction of housing with the nine (9) affordable units and balanced unit mix at the density and with the incentives or concessions.

Reduction in interior setback on East and West side: To ensure the project is physically feasible, the project applicant is requesting a waiver from the interior requirements outlined in GMC §30.11.030 Table 30.11-B. This waiver is necessary to avoid physical constraints that 257 of 334

9 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

could hinder the successful implementation of the development. The project is designed to optimize density to provide nine (9) units affordable to very low-income and moderate- income households and provide for a balanced unit mix to serve a variety of income levels.

The requested waiver from the minimum and average interior setback requirements is needed to allow for the construction of the additional density and affordable units. The overall project massing complies with the allowable zoning standards and massing, except for a few instances where the building mass extends slightly beyond the prescribed setback limits.

These instances are minimal and are a result of design considerations aimed at enhancing the functional layout of the building and optimizing the use of available space.

Without the requested waivers, the project density would be reduced, the number of affordable units reduced, and the balanced unit mix would be affected which will make it physically impossible to build the project at the allowable density with the desired unit mix and number of affordable units and with incentives or concessions.

Reduction in required permanent landscaped open space: Providing the minimum required permanent landscaped open space will effectively preclude the construction of the housing development at the proposed density. By providing the mandated landscaped open space, the available land area for construction will be significantly diminished. This constraint could prevent the project from achieving the planned number of housing units, as the development may not have sufficient space to accommodate the density initially proposed.

2. Describe how the waiver or reduction in development standards will not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact:

These findings can be met. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and no significant environmental impacts have been identified. The project is designed to comply with the various sections of the Glendale Municipal Code as administered by different City Departments (e.g. Fire, Glendale Water & Power, Public Works, Building & Safety, etc.).

Aside from the three incentive / concession requests and waivers, the project otherwise fully complies with the Zoning Code (GMC Title 30). Further, the provision of additional housing and affordable housing benefits the public health and safety and is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element goals of providing a wide range of housing types, including affordable housing. The proposed waiver requests meet the design guidelines that are compatible and appropriate to the adjacent buildings and site context.

In terms of the requested decrease in minimum unit size, sixteen (16) out of forty three (43) units range between 502.6 sf to 591.6 sf. The design ensures that each unit remains functional and livable without leading to overcrowding or excessive density that would negatively affect the physical environment or the quality of life for residents. The reduction in minimum unit size does not compromise the health or safety of future residents or the surrounding community. The project will still meet all applicable building code requirements, including 258 of 334

10 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

those related to ventilation, fire safety, electrical systems, plumbing, and structural integrity.

These regulations ensure that the reduced unit size does not lead to unsafe living conditions or create unhealthy environments.

The project’s impact in terms of increased lot coverage is mitigated by certain factors: The building uses several design techniques that reduce the apparent massing and scale of the building, including a variation in building form and façade, and a variety of exterior finish materials that help break up the apparent building size.

Regarding the two waivers requested for the reduced interior setback on East and West side, overall project massing complies with the allowable zoning standards and massing, except for few instances where the building mass extends slightly beyond the prescribed setback limits.

These instances are minimal and are a result of design considerations aimed at enhancing the functional layout of the building and optimizing the use of available space.

The reduced interior setback does not negatively affect the surrounding community or the environment. The project will maintain necessary separation and ventilation standards, ensuring that any adjustments to setbacks are in line with the overall safety and livability standards required by law. The waiver or reduction in the required interior setback will not have a specific, adverse impact on health, safety, or the physical environment, as outlined in California Government Code Section 65589.5. The project will still comply with all relevant safety regulations, including fire safety and building codes. The reduction is necessary for the financial viability of affordable housing development and does not result in significant harm or negative effects that cannot be mitigated. As such, the concession does not conflict with the goals of providing safe, sustainable, and affordable housing while preserving the welfare of the surrounding community and environment.

The waiver or reduction in the required permanent landscaped open space will not have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 65589.5, upon health, safety, or the physical environment. The proposed reduction in landscaped open space does not compromise public health or safety.

The project will continue to meet all applicable building and safety codes, including those related to fire safety, emergency access, and infrastructure (such as stormwater management). The reduced landscaping will not interfere with critical safety features, such as firebreaks, emergency vehicle access routes, or adequate spacing between structures.

Additionally, the reduced landscaped area will not result in a significant adverse effect on the physical environment. The project has been designed to include other environmental mitigations, which offset potential environmental impacts.

Given the overall design of the project, the reduction in the required permanent landscaped open space does not lead to a specific, adverse impact on health, safety, or the physical environment, and there are no additional measures that could be taken to mitigate such impacts, as they do not exist in this case.
259 of 334

11 408 S. Pasadena Ave.

Suite 6
Pasadena, CA 91105

TEL: (626) 381-9677

3. Describe how the waiver or reduction in development standards will not have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources:

This finding can be met. The property does not meet any of the eligibility criteria for listing in the national, California, or Glendale Registers, and therefore, is not considered a historic resource under CEQA.

4. Describe how the waiver or reduction in development standards will not be contrary to state or federal law.

This finding can be met. The waivers or reduction in development standards will not be contrary to state or federal law and do not require any other discretionary entitlement. The project complies with State Density Bonus Law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the City’s Density Bonus Ordinance, and is designed to comply with the various sections of the Glendale Municipal Code as administered by City Departments (e.g. Fire, Glendale Water & Power, Public Works, Building & Safety, etc.). No other known federal or state laws would conflict with granting the waiver/reduction.

260 of 334

1 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

Class 32 Categorical Exemption Findings
441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale, CA 91202
“Class 32 consists of Projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions described in this section : (a) The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The Project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species ; (d) Approval o f the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality ; (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.” (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15332) (“CEQA Guidelines”).

Project Description
The applicant is seeking approval of a Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Plan for a new residential project at 4 41 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd. with a request for a 138.9% total density bonus (of which 38.9% is discretionary), as well as four concessions and five waivers, pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915, et seq. (“Density Bonus Law”). Density Bonus Law allows developers tha t restrict at least 15 percent of the units in a housing development as rentals to very low income households a mandatory 50% density bonus, which in this case the applicant proposes 16% of the units reserved for very low income households as well as agrees to provide an additional 15% of the units in a housing development to moderate-income households (second density bonus) pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 1287 to amend Section 65915 of the Government Code to allow additional density bonus and incentives or c oncessions. The applicant here is requesting a greater density than 100% density bonus, and thus, pursuant to GMC 30.36.060(D), this discretionary request is subject to the City Council approval following a public hearing.

The 17,101 square -foot site is currently developed with two multi -family residential buildings with eight units and detached carports; all originally built in 1942. The site is located on the north side of W. Glenoaks Blvd., in the R -1250 (High Density Residential) zone . The proposed project would demolish the existing residential structures and detached carports in conjunction with the construction of a new four- story, 47-foot high, 43-unit multi-family residential project totaling approximately 37,898 square feet (SF) with a total of 29 residential parking spaces, within one level of semi- EXHIBIT 6
261 of 334

2 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

subterranean parking . The Project will provide a total of nine (9) affordable units, including a total of six (6) affordable units reserved for very low -income households and three (3) affordable units reserved for moderate income households. Primary access to the building and the semi -subterranean parking will be from W. Glenoaks Blvd. The Project qualifies for reduced parking inclusive of guest and handicapped spaces, under the State Density Bonus Law and Glendale Municipal Code (“GMC) Section 30.36.090 . The Project’s unit mix includes nineteen (19) studio units and twenty-four (24) one -bedroom units. Based on the number of units provided, the Parking Concession requires a minimum of twenty-two (22) residential parking spaces.

The Project exceeds the minimum requirement under the Parking Concession under State Density Bonus Law CA Govt Code § 65915(p)(1) and will provide twenty -nine (29) parking spaces, designated for the residential units. The project site is approximately 0.6 miles northwest of Downtown Glendale surrounded by existing urban uses, including commercial and residential buildings. The Project Site is bordered by multi-family residential development directly to the north, east and west, and a commercial (medical) office use across the street to the south.

a. The Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations.

The Land Use Element of the Glendale General Plan includes a goal to “Support the creation of higher density residential development and alternative forms of medium and high-density housing in those areas best suited from the standpoint of accessibility, current development, community organization, transportation and circulation facilities and economic feasibility” (Glendale General Plan Land Use Element, page 7). The Project is consistent with and helps achieve this goal by redeveloping the project site and building a new structure which will yield a total of 43 residential dwelling units with proximate access to public transportation to access neighborhood services daily. Moreover, the project will advance the goals and policies of the General Plan, Housing Element (2021-2029), including, but not limited to, Goal 1 (“A City with a Wide Range of Housing Types to Meet the Needs of Current and Future Residents), Goal 3 (“A City with Increased Opportunities for Affordable and Special Needs Housing Development) Housing Services that Address Groups with Special Housing Needs) and Policies 3.1 and 3.2 (“Encourage both the private and public sectors to produce or assist in the production of affordable housing for special needs groups such as: persons with disabilities, the elderly, large families, single- parent households, and formerly homeless) and (“Promote the development of extremely low, very low, low and moderate income housing by allowing developers density bonuses or other financial incentives for providing units for low and moderate income residents. The unit mix and location of affordable housing units in density 262 of 334

3 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

bonus projects must be approved by the City and included in an affordable housing agreement.”). The proposed 43-unit residential development will be consistent with the other various elements and objectives of the General Plan.

The project site is located in the R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone where multi- family residential uses are a permitted use, subject to development standards. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the project site as High Density Residential. The Land Use Element is the most directly related to the approval of this use. All other elements of the General Plan will not be impacted as a result of the project. The subject site does not contain any historic resources and is not designated or slated for open space or recreational use and will operate in compliance with the Noise Element thresholds. The Safety Element does not identify any hazards associated with the site. The site is not within a hazard zone and the conditions placed on the proposed use will ensure the project does not contribute to local crime. The adjacent W. Glenoaks Blvd. can accommodate the traffic generated as a result of the project. The Circulation Element identifies W. Glenoaks Blvd., as a Major Arterial, which can accommodate the traffic generated as a result of the project. Major arterials are characteristically the widest urban streets and carry the heaviest traffic volumes. They generally provide motorists with the most continuous, efficient routes throughout the City since traffic signals, parking limitations and prohibitions, and access are utilized to maximize traffic flow. Major arterials distribute traffic to freeways, other arterials, collectors (urban, community and neighborhood), activity and business centers, and other major traffic generators within and outside the City. The City’s Traffic Engineer reviewed the Project and determined that no significant increase in traffic would occur as a result of the Project, as it would not generate a significant increase in the number of vehicle trips to and from the site.

The Project is consistent with Zoning Code designations, standards and regulations, because the Zoning Code recognizes that waivers and incentives associated with density bonus projects are either statutorily allowed by right or may be granted where qualified. Multiple residential dwelling units are permitted in the R-1250 zone. In accordance with GMC 30.11.020, sites zoned R-1250 with more than 90 feet of frontage are permitted one (1) unit per 1,000 square feet, which permits a maximum residential density of 43 units per acre. The project is approximately 17,101 in size, with a lot width of approximately 94 feet. By right, the applicant has a base density of 18 units (17,101/1,000 = 17.10 rounded up to 18) (CA Govt Code § 65915(q) requires all density bonus calculations to be rounded up). Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915, et seq. (“Density Bonus Law”), it allows developers that seek and agree to provide at least 15% of the units in a housing development to very-low income households, a mandatory 50% density bonus, as well as agrees to provide an additional 263 of 334

4 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
15% of the units in a housing development to moderate-income households for an additional 50% density bonus (second density bonus) pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 1287 to amend Section 65915 of the Government Code to allow additional density bonus and four (4) incentives or concessions in exchange for the provision of at least 15% of the base units restricted as rentals for very low income households. The Density Bonus Housing Plan meets the requirements of the Density Bonus Law because the Project is providing 16% of the total base density units of the housing development as affordable units which will be restricted to very low-income households and an additional 15% of the total base density units to moderate-income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code. Additionally, the applicant’s request for the grant of a density bonus is greater than the State Density Bonus Law mandatory maximum of 50%, which is available to the applicant per State Density Bonus Law provision allowing an applicant to request a discretionary density bonus above this mandatory maximum if local ordinance allows (See Cal. Gov’t Code § 65915(n)). In this case, the applicant is providing an additional, 16% of the units associated with the discretionary bonus to very low-income households are proposed.

Pursuant to GMC 30.36.060(D), an applicant may seek a density bonus in an amount greater than that required by State Density Bonus Law, which shall be heard and decided by the City Council following a noticed public hearing. The City Council may approve or deny this request for a discretionary density bonus at its sole discretion b. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

The project site is located in the R-1250 (High Density Residential) zone, entirely within the City of Glendale boundary limits. The site is approximately 17,101 square feet (0.39 acres), which is less than five acres in size. The project site is substantially surrounded by existing similar and complimentary uses. Surrounding urban uses , including multi-family residential are located to the north, east and west of the subject site. As the Public Resources Code (PRC) defines qualified urban use as “any residential, commercial, public institutional, transit or transportation passenger facility, or retail use, or any combination of those uses,” the Project Site is substantially surrounded by urban uses. (PRC § 21072.)
c. The Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The project site is fully developed with eight existing residential uses built in 1942. The project site is not currently a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, and no documentation exists which identifies the project site as such. There are no 264 of 334

5 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

protected trees on the project site. Therefore, the site does not contain or have value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

d. Approval of the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

The project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

Traffic
Parking for the project is provided within a one-level semi subterranean garage with 29 spaces. Access to the parking garage is on W. Glenoaks Blvd. via a driveway proposed at the western portion of the site.

Based on the attached trip generation estimates conducted by staff, the proposed project is estimated to generate fewer than 50 net peak-hour trips, thus, no Traffic Impact Analysis is required. A summary of the results are attached hereto as Attachment “1”.

Vehicle Miles Traveled

In 2018, the State of California amended the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Appendix G question for transportation impacts to delete reference to vehicle delay and level of service and instead refer to Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines asking if the Project will result in a substantial increase in VMT. Accordingly, the City of Glendale adopted VMT as the metric for assessing transportation impacts for land use Projects. To comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), development projects in the City of Glendale must conduct vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis to evaluate a project’s potential significant impacts. The City has prepared Transportation Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, to provide guidance on whether a project can be screened out of a detailed VMT analysis, or if the applicant would need to perform a detailed VMT analysis. The guidelines include detailed guidance for conducting an SB 743-consistent transportation impact analysis of VMT as well as assessing significant impacts related to public transit, pedestrians, bicyclists, hazards/design features, and emergency access.

The project is not required to prepare a detailed Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis because according to Section 2.1.2.1 of the City’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines, projects that generate fewer than 145 daily vehicle trips can be presumed to cause a 265 of 334

6 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
less-than-significant transportation impact and would not require a detailed VMT analysis; which is based on the proposed project’s total uses without taking a credit for existing uses. As proposed, the project is considered a small project, which is estimated to generate less than 50 net peak-hour trips and is thus screened out of the requirement to prepare a detailed VMT analysis. The project would have a less-than- significant VMT impact. A summary of the results are attached hereto as Attachment “2”.

Noise
The project involves the demolition of the existing residential buildings and associated carports, and construction of a new four-story, 43-unit multi-family residential development with one level of semi-subterranean parking on an approximately 17,101 SF lot. The project is located in a developed urban area. The surrounding neighborhood is developed with residential dwellings to the north, east, and west of the subject site and commercial uses are located to the south (across the street). The proposed project would generate similar if the not the same noise as other residential uses in the area. As a result, the project would not add substantial operational noise that would be audible above existing conditions.

The proposed use as a multi-family residential development is permitted by right on the subject property zoned R-1250, and complies with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. As shown in the City’s Noise Element, the northerly portion of the project site is located within the 70 dB and over noise contour, and the southerly portion remainder of the site is located within the 65-70 dB noise contour. The new project would be constructed to reduce interior noise to acceptable levels as required by the building code, and the project is not anticipated to generate noise in excess of limits contained in the Noise Element.

A temporary periodic increase in ambient noise would occur during construction activities associated with the proposed project. Noise from the construction activities would be generated by vehicles and equipment involved during various stages of construction operations: site grading, foundation, and building construction. The noise levels created by construction equipment would vary depending on factors such as the type of equipment and the specific model, the mechanical/operational condition of the equipment, and the type of operation being performed. However, all development within the project site will be required to comply with the City of Glendale Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 8.36), which prohibits construction activities to between the hours of 7:00 p.m. on one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day or from 7:00 p.m. on Saturday to 7:00 a.m. on Monday or from 7:00 p.m. preceding a holiday. 266 of 334

7 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

The proposed project would have a minimal effect on the noise environment in proximity to the project site. Noise generated by the proposed project would result primarily from visitors, off-site traffic, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. However, the proposed project’s mechanical equipment would need to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance, which establishes maximum permitted noise levels from mechanical equipment. The project would be constructed to reduce interior noise to acceptable levels as required by the building code, and the project is not anticipated to generate noise in excess of limits contained in the Noise Element.

The project’s compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance would ensure that noise levels from building mechanical equipment would not exceed thresholds of significance.

The proposed project would be constructed using typical construction techniques and would not require the use of pile driving for construction, thus reducing significant vibration impacts. Heavy construction equipment (e.g., bulldozer and excavator) would generate a limited amount of ground-borne vibration during construction activities at short distances away from the source. The use of equipment would be limited to a few hours spread over several days during grading and excavation activities. As such, ground-borne vibration and noise levels associated with the proposed project would be less than significant.

Air Quality
The California Emissions Estimator Model® (CalEEMod) was used to estimate air quality impacts during the construction and operation stages of the project. Results from the model indicate that the proposed project would not exceed thresholds for construction, area, or operational impacts. A summary of the results is attached hereto as Attachment “3".

Water Quality
Implementation of the proposed project will require compliance with all the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements including the submittal and certification of plans and details showing both construction and post-construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are integrated into the design of the project.

The submittal of a Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), as approved by the City Engineer, will also be required to be integrated into the design of the project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project is not expected to violate any water quality standards or wastewater discharge requirements since the project will be required to comply with applicable permitting requirements. 267 of 334

8 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

Because the proposed infill development would redevelop land that is fully developed with urban uses, construction would not impact water flows or water quality. The Project would comply with the City’s Low Impact Development (LID) Guidelines set forth in Chapter 13.43 of the GMC and with applicable state and federal regulations.

Such LID standards are designed to minimize the impervious area footprint, prevent pollutants of concern from leaving the development site in stormwater as the result of storms, and minimize hydromodification impacts to natural drainage systems. (GMC §

13.43.040(A). Compliance with these regulations will ensure that the Project would not result in a significant impact to water quality. Existing utilities would provide water supplies and wastewater treatment services to the subject property. e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

There will not be a considerable increase in demand for services or utilities due to project implementation. The project would be located in an existing urban area with existing buildings that have been adequately served by existing public utilities and services. All new construction on site will be served by the same existing public utilities and services. These services include water, electricity, solid waste collection and sewer services provided by the City of Glendale. Accordingly, the Project will be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

268 of 334

9 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions
(CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2)

Proposed Findings

a. Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located a Project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the Project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

Because the Project is relying on Class 32 exemption, this exception does not apply.

b. Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive Projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

There is not a succession of known projects of the same type located in the same place as the subject project. Since this project qualifies for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption and is subject to Regulatory Compliance Measures, no cumulative impacts are anticipated. Further, the proposed 43-unit multi-family residential development does not exceed thresholds identified for impacts to the area (including noise, traffic, and air quality) and will not result in significant cumulative impacts.

c. Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

The project proposes a 43-unit multi-family residential project in an area zoned and designated for such use. Other similarly situated sites could be developed in the same manner and there is nothing unusual about the project site. Adjacent and nearby lots are developed with residential and commercial buildings. No unusual circumstances are present or foreseeable.

d. Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a Project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, 269 of 334

10 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.

The project site is located in an urban environment surrounded by urban development.

The site is bordered by Dryden Street to the North, Glenoaks Blvd. to the South, Central Avenue to the East, and Pacific Avenue to the West. The project site is surrounded by existing urban uses, including residential and commercial buildings.

According to information on the California Department of Transportation’s State Scenic Highway Program, there are no state scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site. e. Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a Project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

The project site is developed and is not within a designated hazardous site. The project site is not located on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List-Site Cleanup (Cortese List), nor is it listed on the EnviroStor database. Further, the project site is not on the following lists maintained by the State Water Board: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites, Solid Waste Disposal Sites, or Active Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders. The project site is also not identified on the list of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code, identified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. f. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a Project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

The properties at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd. are not listed on the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, or Glendale Register of Historic Resources. Based on building permit records, the existing structures proposed to be demolished includes two, multi-family residential buildings with a total of eight units and associated parking built circa 1942 located at 441 and 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Professional planning staff reviewed the structures proposed to be demolished and determined that the buildings do not qualify as historic resources because none of the findings that would qualify the properties for listing on the Glendale Register pursuant to GMC §15.20.050 (Findings for listing resources in the Glendale Register of Historic Resources), can be made, and therefore these properties are not considered historic resources. Specifically, the properties are not:
270 of 334

11 CCR § 15332 In-fill Development Projects Exemption
New 43-Unit Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Residential Project 441 - 445 W. Glenoaks Blvd.

A. Identified with important events in national, state, or city history, or exemplifies significant contributions to the broad cultural, political, economic, social, tribal, or historic heritage of the nation, state, or city, and do not retain historic integrity.

B. Associated with a person, persons, or groups who significantly contributed to the history of the nation, state, region, or city, and retain historic integrity.

C. Embodiments of the distinctive and exemplary characteristics of an architectural style, architectural type, period, or method of construction; and do not represent notable work of a master designer, builder or architect whose genius influenced his or her profession; do not possesses high artistic values or retain historic integrity.

D. Properties that have yielded, or have the potential to yield, information important to archaeological pre-history or history of the nation, state, region, or city, and retains historic integrity.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Trip generation estimates

2. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

3. California Emissions Estimator Module
271 of 334

Traffic, Transportation, and Parking Consultants
833 Americana Way, Suite 505
Glendale, CA 91210
[email protected]
Ph: 818-694-2880
Fax: 818-888-4541
1 To: Pastor Casanova, T.E., Principal Traffic Engineer, City of Glendale From: Jano Baghdanian, P.E., T.E., President, JB & Associates Date: May 6, 2024
Subject: 441-445 W. Glenoaks Blvd 43 Unit Apartment Complex, Glendale, CA This Technical Memorandum has been prepared for the proposed apartment project located at 441- 445 W. Glenoaks Boulevard (the “Project”), in the City of Glendale, California. The purpose of this memorandum is to present the Project background information, the Project trip generation and determine if any local transportation analysis is required to receive the City’s approval to proceed with the local transportation analysis.

Project Description
The Project is located at 441-445 W. Glenoaks Boulevard and is located at the midblock of Pacific Avenue and San Rafael Avenue. The Project site consists of a four-story 43-unit apartment complex with subterranean parking. The Project is proposed to demolish two existing single story multifamily structures consisting of eight units on the lot.

Project Access
As shown in Figure 1—Project Site Plan, vehicular access to and from the subterranean garage will be provided through a 20-foot-wide two-way driveway at the south end of the Project site on W. Glenoaks Boulevard.
272 of 334

2 Project Trip Generation
The number of vehicular trips generated by the Project on a weekday and during the AM and PM community peak hours were estimated using Trip Generation Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition. The results are shown in Table 1—Project Trip Generation.

The Project is estimated to generate 13 net new AM peak-hour trips, and 13 net new PM peak- hour trips with 141 net new daily trips.

The Project is estimated to generate less than 50 total vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours. In accordance with the City of Glendale Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated October 30, 2020, a local transportation analysis is not required for the Project.

Additionally, in accordance with the City of Glendale Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines section 2.1.2. Project Screening, Projects that generate fewer than 145 daily vehicle trips can be presumed to cause a less-than-significant transportation impact and would not require a detailed VMT analysis. The proposed project’s net daily trips is 141 which is less than the City’s 145 daily vehicle trip threshold which would not require a detailed VMT analysis.

273 of 334

3 Figure 1 – Project Site Plan
274 of 334

4 275 of 334

Traffic, Transportation, and Parking Consultants
833 Americana Way, Suite 505.

Glendale, CA 91210
[email protected]
Ph: 818-694-2880
Fax: 818-888-4541

1 | Page

To: Fred Zohrehvand, Principal Mobility Planner, City of Glendale Community Development Department
From: Jano Baghdanian, JB & Associates
Date: May 22, 2024
Subject: Vehicle Miles Traveled Screen Assessment Memorandum

Project: 441-445 W. Glenoaks 43-Unit Apartment Complex Project – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment

This memorandum has been prepared by JB Associates to provide a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) screening assessment for the proposed residential project (the “Project”) located at 441-445 W.

Glenoaks Boulevard (“Project Site”) in the City of Glendale, California. The Project Site is generally bounded by multi-family residences to the east and west, Glenoa ks Boulevard to the south and N. Pacific Avenue to the west. See the attached Site Plan in Appendix A.

This screening analysis is conducted based on the characteristics and location of the project and based on the low trip generation (less than 145 daily trips), the Project screens out from a formal VMT assessment. The VMT screening assessment pr ovides: 1) a description of the existing setting; 2) a description of the proposed Proj ect; and 3) a VMT scr eening assessment for the proposed Project.

Existing Setting
The Project Site is located at 441-445 W. Glenoaks Boulevard. The existing Project site comprises approximately two existing single story multifamily structures consisting of eight units on the lot and it is bounded by multi-family residentials to the east and west, Glenoaks Boulevard to the south and N. Pacific Avenue to the west. The Project Site and general vicinity is shown in Figure

1. 276 of 334

2 | Page
Project Description
The Applicant proposes the removal of two existing single story multifamily structures consisting of eight units and to construct a new four st ory 43-unit apartment complex with subterranean parking. The Project proposes to provide 30 vehicle parking spaces.

Figure 1 – Project Site and General Vicinity
Vehicle Mile Travel (VMT) Analysis
Overview of Senate Bill 743
On September 27, 2013, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) SB 743 (Steinberg, 2013). Among other things, SB 743 created a process to change the way the analysis of transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ A) is conducted. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) was tasked to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to the traditional metric of automobile delay which would promote three statutory goals: the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.

Under SB 743, the focus of transportation analysis pursuant to CEQA shifts from driver delay, or Level of Service (LOS), to reduction in VMT, redu ction in GHG emissions, creation of multimodal networks, and promotion of mixed-use developments. In December 2018, the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted amendments to the CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 743 Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA with an implementation date of July 1, 2020, which has passed.
277 of 334

3 | Page

Project Screening Criteria
Lead agencies traditionally have set certain th resholds to determine whether a project requires transportation analysis or if a project could be expected to cause less than significant impacts without a detailed study. Typically, these threshol ds were based on a project’s peak hour trip generation forecast (e.g., if a project was expected to result in 50 or more weekday AM or PM peak hour vehicle trips). Under SB 743, this shifts to VMT methodology and a screening process to determine if a project will be required to conduct a detailed (quantitative) assessment of VMT.

OPR’s Technical Advisory included several criteria for proj ect screening purposes, including transit proximity and project size (small projec ts). The City has subsequently adopted their revised transportation impact analysis guidelines (TIA Guidelines), and this memorandum has been prepared in response to this guidance, as described in the following paragraphs.

Small Projects
Section 2.1.2.1 of the City’s TIA Guidelines notes that projects that generate fewer than 145 daily vehicle trips can be presumed to cause a less-th an-significant transportation impact and would not require a detailed VMT analysis. Trips should be calculated using ITE trip generation rates or local data, if available. Based on the above-referenced vehicle trip generation forecast, a formal VMT assessment is not required to be performed for the Project as the Project’s forecast daily vehicle trips does not exceed daily vehicle trip threshold of 145 daily vehicle trips established in Section 2.1.2.1 of the City’s TIA Guidelines. As shown in Table 1 the Project’s net daily trip generation is 141, less than the 145 daily net vehicles trips threshold.

Table 1 – Project Trip Generation Table

In addition, based on the city ‘s Transportation Impact Guidelines High-Quality Transit (HQTP) map and the online mapping tool, the project is in a Future High-Quality Transit Area. Therefore, 278 of 334

4 | Page
it is qualifying for 5% trip reduction criteria (Section 2.12.1). Applying 5% to the net daily trip reduction to project will result 134 (141-7) total net daily trips for proposed project.

According to Section 2.1.2.1, Ci ty of Glendale Transportation Impact Guidelines, Multifamily Housing portion will produce less than 145 net daily trips and it is screened out of VMT analysis.

Figure 2 – Future HQTA
In conclusion, the Project screens out of furt her VMT analysis based on lower daily vehicle threshold of 145 daily trips and map-based screening for residential and employment project that are proposed in areas that generate a VMT below adopted City thresholds.

Jano Baghdanian, PE, TE
Project
Location
279 of 334

5 | Page

Appendix A:

Project Site Plan

280 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 1 / 51
441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
281 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 2 / 51

3.11. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.13. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.15. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
282 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 3 / 51

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings
283 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 4 / 51

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
284 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 5 / 51

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
285 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 6 / 51

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
286 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 7 / 51

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential
Construction Start Date 8/4/2026
Operational Y ear 2028
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 20.2
Location 34.16015618382147, -118.26340602927905
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Glendale
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 3914
EDFZ 18
Electric Utility Glendale Water & Power
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.30

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments High
Rise

43.0 Dwelling Unit 0.92 37,898 1,780 0.00 127 —
287 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 8 / 51
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

13.5 1000sqft 0.00 13,500 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
U n m i t . 7 . 3 77 . 2 51 2 . 21 5 . 40 . 0 30 . 4 56 . 1 06 . 5 50 . 4 22 . 7 83 . 2 0— 4 , 2 9 5 4 , 2 9 5 0 . 2 10 . 4 15 . 9 04 , 4 2 9 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
U n m i t . 1 . 4 31 . 0 91 2 . 31 1 . 30 . 0 30 . 4 56 . 1 06 . 5 50 . 4 22 . 7 83 . 2 0— 4 , 2 9 1 4 , 2 9 1 0 . 2 10 . 4 10 . 1 54 , 4 1 9 Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 0.90 0.86 4.24 7.69 0.01 0.14 0.73 0.81 0.13 0.30 0.38 — 1,698 1,698 0.06 0.05 0.76 1,715 Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 0.16 0.16 0.77 1.40 < 0.005 0.03 0.13 0.15 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 281 281 0.01 0.01 0.13 284

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 288 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 9 / 51
——————————————————Daily -
Summer
(Max)
2026 1.43 1.09 12.2 11.3 0.03 0.45 6.10 6.55 0.42 2.78 3.20 — 4,295 4,295 0.21 0.41 5.90 4,429 2027 0.73 0.61 4.91 9.21 0.01 0.17 0.54 0.71 0.16 0.13 0.28 — 1,999 1,999 0.08 0.06 2.06 2,020 2028 7.37 7.25 8.75 15.4 0.02 0.30 0.77 1.07 0.28 0.18 0.46 — 3,037 3,037 0.10 0.07 2.53 3,064 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
2026 1.43 1.09 12.3 11.3 0.03 0.45 6.10 6.55 0.42 2.78 3.20 — 4,291 4,291 0.21 0.41 0.15 4,419 2027 0.73 0.61 4.95 8.87 0.01 0.17 0.54 0.71 0.16 0.13 0.28 — 1,974 1,974 0.07 0.06 0.05 1,993 2028 0.70 0.59 4.67 8.77 0.01 0.15 0.54 0.69 0.14 0.13 0.27 — 1,961 1,961 0.07 0.06 0.05 1,980 Average
Daily
——————————————————
2026 0.31 0.25 2.40 3.03 0.01 0.09 0.73 0.81 0.08 0.30 0.38 — 819 819 0.04 0.05 0.42 836 2027 0.62 0.52 4.24 7.69 0.01 0.14 0.45 0.60 0.13 0.11 0.24 — 1,698 1,698 0.06 0.05 0.76 1,715 2028 0.90 0.86 1.66 2.98 < 0.005 0.05 0.17 0.22 0.05 0.04 0.09 — 621 621 0.02 0.02 0.24 627 A n n u a l ——————————————————
2026 0.06 0.04 0.44 0.55 < 0.005 0.02 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.05 0.07 — 136 136 0.01 0.01 0.07 138 2027 0.11 0.10 0.77 1.40 < 0.005 0.03 0.08 0.11 0.02 0.02 0.04 — 281 281 0.01 0.01 0.13 284 2028 0.16 0.16 0.30 0.54 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 104

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
U n m i t . 1 4 . 31 3 . 01 . 4 93 0 . 00 . 0 73 . 0 91 . 2 14 . 3 03 . 0 30 . 3 13 . 3 44 2 3 2 , 9 1 4 3 , 3 3 7 3 . 3 20 . 0 73 . 8 63 , 4 4 7 289 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 10 / 51
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
U n m i t . 1 4 . 01 2 . 71 . 5 12 6 . 60 . 0 73 . 0 91 . 2 14 . 3 03 . 0 30 . 3 13 . 3 44 2 3 2 , 8 5 2 3 , 2 7 5 3 . 3 20 . 0 80 . 3 63 , 3 8 1 Average
Daily
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 2.59 2.42 0.68 8.23 0.02 0.23 1.14 1.37 0.23 0.29 0.52 47.8 2,102 2,150 2.20 0.06 1.75 2,225 Annual
(Max)
——————————————————
Unmit. 0.47 0.44 0.12 1.50 < 0.005 0.04 0.21 0.25 0.04 0.05 0.09 7.91 348 356 0.36 0.01 0.29 368

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 0.65 0.59 0.42 5.08 0.01 0.01 1.21 1.22 0.01 0.31 0.31 — 1,295 1,295 0.06 0.05 3.59 1,315 Area 13.7 12.4 0.92 24.9 0.06 3.07 — 3.07 3.02 — 3.02 403 779 1,181 1.20 0.01 — 1,216 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 810 810 0.04 < 0.005 — 811 W a t e r ———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 W a s t e ———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 R e f r i g . ————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
T o t a l 1 4 . 31 3 . 01 . 4 93 0 . 00 . 0 73 . 0 91 . 2 14 . 3 03 . 0 30 . 3 13 . 3 44 2 3 2 , 9 1 4 3 , 3 3 7 3 . 3 20 . 0 73 . 8 63 , 4 4 7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Mobile 0.65 0.58 0.46 4.68 0.01 0.01 1.21 1.22 0.01 0.31 0.31 — 1,241 1,241 0.06 0.05 0.09 1,259 Area 13.3 12.1 0.89 21.9 0.06 3.07 — 3.07 3.01 — 3.01 403 770 1,172 1.20 0.01 — 1,207 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 810 810 0.04 < 0.005 — 811 290 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 11 / 51
W a t e r ———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 W a s t e ———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 R e f r i g . ————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
T o t a l 1 4 . 01 2 . 71 . 5 12 6 . 60 . 0 73 . 0 91 . 2 14 . 3 03 . 0 30 . 3 13 . 3 44 2 3 2 , 8 5 2 3 , 2 7 5 3 . 3 20 . 0 80 . 3 63 , 3 8 1 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Mobile 0.61 0.56 0.45 4.60 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,203 1,203 0.06 0.05 1.48 1,221 A r e a 1 . 9 51 . 8 60 . 0 83 . 5 7< 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 2 1— 0 . 2 10 . 2 1— 0 . 2 12 7 . 65 8 . 88 6 . 40 . 0 8< 0 . 0 0 5 — 8 8 . 8 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 810 810 0.04 < 0.005 — 811 W a t e r ———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 W a s t e ———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 R e f r i g . ————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
Total 2.59 2.42 0.68 8.23 0.02 0.23 1.14 1.37 0.23 0.29 0.52 47.8 2,102 2,150 2.20 0.06 1.75 2,225 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Mobile 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.25 202 Area 0.36 0.34 0.01 0.65 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 4.57 9.74 14.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 14.7 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 W a t e r ———————————0 . 5 1 5 . 1 5 5 . 6 6 0 . 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —7 . 3 4 W a s t e ———————————2 . 8 3 0 . 0 0 2 . 8 3 0 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 —9 . 9 0 R e f r i g . ————————————————0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4
Total 0.47 0.44 0.12 1.50 < 0.005 0.04 0.21 0.25 0.04 0.05 0.09 7.91 348 356 0.36 0.01 0.29 368

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
291 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 12 / 51
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.53 0.44 4.09 5.58 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 852 852 0.03 0.01 — 855 Demoliti
on
——————0 . 2 4 0 . 2 4 —0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.04 0.04 0.33 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 67.7 67.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 67.9 Demoliti
on
——————0 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 —< 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.2 11.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.2 Demoliti
on
——————< 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —< 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 ——————— Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
292 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 13 / 51
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 135 135 0.01 < 0.005 0.46 137 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.23 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 192 192 0.01 0.03 0.43 202 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.4 10.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.3 15.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 16.0 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.71 1.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.74 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.53 2.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.66

3.3. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.52 0.44 3.74 5.54 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 858 858 0.03 0.01 — 861 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0 . 5 3 0 . 5 3 —0 . 0 6 0 . 0 6 ———————
293 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 14 / 51

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.02 0.01 0.12 0.18 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.2 28.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.3 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 —< 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.67 4.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.69 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————< 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —< 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 ——————— Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 67.7 67.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 68.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.17 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 142 142 0.01 0.02 0.32 149 294 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 15 / 51
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.14 2.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.17 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.66 4.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.89 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.35 0.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.36 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.77 0.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.81

3.5. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

1.22 1.02 9.19 9.69 0.02 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 1,714 1,714 0.07 0.01 — 1,720 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————5 . 3 3 5 . 3 3 —2 . 5 7 2 . 5 7 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
295 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 16 / 51
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.12 0.10 0.91 0.96 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 — 170 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0 . 5 3 0 . 5 3 —0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.02 0.02 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.0 28.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
——————0 . 1 0 0 . 1 0 —0 . 0 5 0 . 0 5 ———————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 103 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 296 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 17 / 51
Hauling 0.18 0.04 2.98 1.17 0.02 0.03 0.68 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.22 — 2,479 2,479 0.14 0.40 5.56 2,606 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 96.3 96.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 97.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.18 0.04 3.10 1.19 0.02 0.03 0.68 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.22 — 2,480 2,480 0.14 0.40 0.14 2,602 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.64 9.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.31 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 245 245 0.01 0.04 0.24 257 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.60 1.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.5 40.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 42.5

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.59 0.49 4.81 6.91 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 297 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 18 / 51

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.08 0.07 0.64 0.92 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 175 175 0.01 < 0.005 — 175 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.0 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.15 0.13 0.16 2.02 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 — 470 470 0.02 0.02 0.04 476 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.24 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 212 212 0.01 0.03 0.01 222 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 63.9 63.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 64.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.4 28.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.6 10.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 10.7 298 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 19 / 51
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.71 4.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.92 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.49 0.41 3.90 5.91 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 1,118 1,118 0.05 0.01 — 1,122 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
299 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 20 / 51
Off-Roa
Equipment

0.09 0.07 0.71 1.08 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 185 185 0.01 < 0.005 — 186 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.15 0.13 0.13 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 — 487 487 0.02 0.02 1.52 494 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 208 208 0.01 0.03 0.54 218 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.15 0.13 0.16 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 — 462 462 0.01 0.02 0.04 467 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 208 208 0.01 0.03 0.01 217 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.14 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 401 401 0.01 0.01 0.56 407 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 178 178 0.01 0.02 0.20 186 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 66.5 66.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 67.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.6 29.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 30.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
300 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 21 / 51
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.14 0.12 1.09 1.75 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 331 331 0.01 < 0.005 — 332 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.03 0.02 0.20 0.32 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 54.8 54.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.0 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
301 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 22 / 51
Worker 0.14 0.13 0.12 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 — 478 478 < 0.005 0.02 1.36 485 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.21 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 203 203 0.01 0.03 0.51 213 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.14 0.12 0.14 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.11 0.11 — 453 453 0.01 0.02 0.04 459 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.22 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 203 203 0.01 0.03 0.01 212 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 117 117 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 118 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.6 51.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 53.9 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.3 19.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 19.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.54 8.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.92 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.56 0.47 4.05 5.31 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 P a v i n g 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 ————————————————
302 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 23 / 51
Onsite
truck

0.05 0.04 0.39 0.51 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 78.9 78.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 79.2 P a v i n g 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.1 P a v i n g 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.65 232 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.1 21.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 21.3 303 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 24 / 51
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.49 3.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.53 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e O n s i t e ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coating
s
6 . 5 9 6 . 5 9 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.01 0.01 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.2 304 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 25 / 51
————————————————0.650.65Architect
ural
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Off-Roa
d
Equipm
ent
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.18 2.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.19 Architect
ural
Coating
s
0 . 1 2 0 . 1 2 ————————————————
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite ——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 95.6 95.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 96.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.07 9.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.19 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.50 1.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.52 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 305 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 26 / 51

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise

0.65 0.59 0.42 5.08 0.01 0.01 1.21 1.22 0.01 0.31 0.31 — 1,295 1,295 0.06 0.05 3.59 1,315 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.65 0.59 0.42 5.08 0.01 0.01 1.21 1.22 0.01 0.31 0.31 — 1,295 1,295 0.06 0.05 3.59 1,315 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise

0.65 0.58 0.46 4.68 0.01 0.01 1.21 1.22 0.01 0.31 0.31 — 1,241 1,241 0.06 0.05 0.09 1,259 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.65 0.58 0.46 4.68 0.01 0.01 1.21 1.22 0.01 0.31 0.31 — 1,241 1,241 0.06 0.05 0.09 1,259 A n n u a l ——————————————————
306 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 27 / 51
Apartme
High
Rise

0.11 0.10 0.08 0.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.25 202 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.25 202

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
————————————4 7 9 4 7 9 0 . 0 2 < 0 . 0 0 5 —4 8 0
Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————1 4 0 1 4 0 < 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —1 4 0
T o t a l ————————————6 1 9 6 1 9 0 . 0 2 < 0 . 0 0 5 —6 2 1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
————————————4 7 9 4 7 9 0 . 0 2 < 0 . 0 0 5 —4 8 0
307 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 28 / 51
Enclose
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————1 4 0 1 4 0 < 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —1 4 0
T o t a l ————————————6 1 9 6 1 9 0 . 0 2 < 0 . 0 0 5 —6 2 1 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
————————————7 9 . 4 7 9 . 4 < 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —7 9 . 5 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
————————————2 3 . 2 2 3 . 2 < 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —2 3 . 2 T o t a l ————————————1 0 3 1 0 3 < 0 . 0 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —1 0 3

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 308 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 29 / 51
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Apartme
nts
High
Rise

0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 — 191 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.6 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.6

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Hearths 12.5 11.2 0.89 21.9 0.06 3.07 — 3.07 3.01 — 3.01 403 770 1,172 1.20 0.01 — 1,207 309 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 30 / 51
————————————————0.810.81Consum
er
Architect
ural
Coating
s
0 . 0 6 0 . 0 6 ————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipm
ent

0.33 0.31 0.03 3.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.94 8.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.97 Total 13.7 12.4 0.92 24.9 0.06 3.07 — 3.07 3.02 — 3.02 403 779 1,181 1.20 0.01 — 1,216 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Hearths 12.5 11.2 0.89 21.9 0.06 3.07 — 3.07 3.01 — 3.01 403 770 1,172 1.20 0.01 — 1,207 Consum
er
Product
s
0 . 8 1 0 . 8 1 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s
0 . 0 6 0 . 0 6 ————————————————
Total 13.3 12.1 0.89 21.9 0.06 3.07 — 3.07 3.01 — 3.01 403 770 1,172 1.20 0.01 — 1,207 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Hearths 0.16 0.14 0.01 0.27 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 4.57 8.73 13.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 13.7 Consum
er
Product
s
0 . 1 5 0 . 1 5 ————————————————
Architect
ural
Coating
s
0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 ————————————————
310 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 31 / 51

1.02—< 0.005<0 . 0 0 51.011.01—< 0.005—<0 . 0 0 5<0 . 0 0 5—<0 . 0 0 5< 0.0050.38< 0.0050.040.04Landsca pe
Equipm
ent
Total 0.36 0.34 0.01 0.65 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 4.57 9.74 14.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 14.7

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 —0 . 0 0 T o t a l ———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 —0 . 0 0 311 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 32 / 51
T o t a l ———————————3 . 0 7 3 1 . 1 3 4 . 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 0 1 —4 4 . 3 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
———————————0 . 5 1 5 . 1 5 5 . 6 6 0 . 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —7 . 3 4 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 —0 . 0 0 T o t a l ———————————0 . 5 1 5 . 1 5 5 . 6 6 0 . 0 5 < 0 . 0 0 5 —7 . 3 4

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 —0 . 0 0 T o t a l ———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
312 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 33 / 51
Apartme
High
Rise
———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 —0 . 0 0 T o t a l ———————————1 7 . 1 0 . 0 0 1 7 . 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 —5 9 . 8 A n n u a l ——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
———————————2 . 8 3 0 . 0 0 2 . 8 3 0 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 —9 . 9 0 Enclose
d
Parking
with
Elevator
———————————0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 —0 . 0 0 T o t a l ———————————2 . 8 3 0 . 0 0 2 . 8 3 0 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 —9 . 9 0

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
T o t a l ————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
313 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 34 / 51
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
T o t a l ————————————————0 . 2 7 0 . 2 7
A n n u a l ——————————————————
Apartme
nts
High
Rise
————————————————0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4
T o t a l ————————————————0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
A n n u a l ——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
314 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 35 / 51

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
A n n u a l ——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipm
ent
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
315 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 36 / 51
A n n u a l ——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetati
on
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
A n n u a l ——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————
316 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 37 / 51
A n n u a l ——————————————————
T o t a l ——————————————————

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided ——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
———————————————————
A n n u a l ——————————————————
317 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 38 / 51
Avoided ——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
Remove
d
——————————————————
S u b t o t a l ——————————————————
———————————————————

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 8/4/2026 9/5/2026 6.00 29.0 demolition Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/10/2026 9/23/2026 6.00 12.0 Site Prep Grading Grading 9/24/2026 11/4/2026 6.00 36.0 Grading
Building Construction Building Construction 11/5/2026 4/17/2028 6.00 454 — Paving Paving 4/17/2028 5/26/2028 6.00 35.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2028 7/6/2028 6.00 36.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 318 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 39 / 51

0.3784.06.002.00AverageDieselDemolition Tractors/Loaders/Back hoes
Site Preparation Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Tr ip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ————
Demolition Worker 10.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 2.83 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
319 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 40 / 51
Site Preparation ————
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 2.08 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading ————
Grading Worker 7.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 36.4 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction ————
Building Construction Worker 36.6 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 6.81 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
P a v i n g ————
Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating ————
Architectural Coating Worker 7.33 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles
320 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 41 / 51

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 76,743 25,581 0.00 0.00 —

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic
Y ards)
Material Exported (Cubic
Y ards)
Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Building
Square Footage)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,045 —
Site Preparation 100 100 6.00 0.00 —
Grading 5,245 5,245 27.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments High Rise — 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
321 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 42 / 51
2026 0.00 1,025 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 1,025 0.03 < 0.005
2028 0.00 1,025 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Apartments High
Rise
191 195 154 68,094 1,675 1,706 1,352 596,236
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments High Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 2
Gas Fireplaces 37
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 4
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 2
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 2
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
322 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 43 / 51

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
76743.45 25,581 0.00 0.00 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments High Rise 170,608 1,025 0.0330 0.0040 593,615 Enclosed Parking with
Elevator
49,834 1,025 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments High Rise 1,602,773 30,511
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation
323 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 44 / 51

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments High Rise 31.7 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments High Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments High Rise Household
refrigerators and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) 324 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 45 / 51

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 11.7 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 6.75 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm 325 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 46 / 51
Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3 .7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: Norise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5),Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 100N / A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
S e a L e v e l R i s e 100N / A
Wildfire 100N / A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 000N / A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1112
326 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 47 / 51
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
S e a L e v e l R i s e 1112
Wildfire 1112
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1112
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 72.5
AQ-PM 68.7
AQ-DPM 52.7
Drinking Water 76.0
Lead Risk Housing 32.6
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 68.9
Traffic 46.3
Effect Indicators —
327 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 48 / 51
CleanUp Sites 91.0
Groundwater 0.00
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 38.7
Impaired Water Bodies 58.7
Solid Waste 25.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 26.7
Cardio-vascular 75.4
Low Birth Weights 32.8
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 43.4
Housing 96.9
Linguistic 94.8
Poverty 52.7
Unemployment 57.2

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 34.08186834
Employed 25.70255357
Median HI 32.20839215
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 62.20967535
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 44.93776466
Transportation —
328 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 49 / 51
Auto Access 18.65776979
Active commuting 67.17567047
Social —
2-parent households 70.90979084
Voting 47.04221737
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 4.516874118
Park access 23.14897985
Retail density 70.13986911
Supermarket access 94.25125112
Tree canopy 69.0619787
Housing —
Homeownership 2.001796484
Housing habitability 9.39304504
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 10.97138458 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 7.570896959
Uncrowded housing 56.30694213
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 50.62235339
Arthritis 26.6
Asthma ER Admissions 66.2
High Blood Pressure 39.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 43.1
Coronary Heart Disease 21.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 22.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 45.1
329 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 50 / 51
Cognitively Disabled 11.9
Physically Disabled 12.2
Heart Attack ER Admissions 44.5
Mental Health Not Good 43.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 55.3
Obesity 57.4
Pedestrian Injuries 71.4
Physical Health Not Good 41.5
Stroke 26.0
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 63.5
Current Smoker 37.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 52.7
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 96.8
Elderly 17.9
English Speaking 3.7
Foreign-born 99.2
Outdoor Workers 69.7
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 6.8
Traffic Density 47.7
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 51.2
Other Decision Support —
330 of 334

441 W Glenoaks - 43 Unit Residential Detailed Report, 8/19/2025 51 / 51
2016 Voting 11.0

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 68.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 35.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use To construct a 43-unit, 37,898 SF , multi-family residential building with a one-level, 13,493 SF subterranean garage on a 17,100 SF (0.392 acre) site with 1,780 SF of landscaping.

Construction: Construction Phases DEMO = 4 WEEKS; SITE PREP = 2 WEEKS; GRADING = 6 WEEKS; CONSTRUCTION = 72 WEEKS; PAVING= 4 WEEKS; ARCH COATING= 4 WEEKS
331 of 334

I I I I I I I
City of Glendale
Disclosure - Campaign Finance Ordinance
Applicants Seeking Entitlement
Submit to Permit Services Center, 633 E. Broadway, Rm. 101.

F
or more information, call 818-548-3200.
(To be Completed Prior to Preparation of Staff Reports for Consideration of Entitlement Matter by Council, Agency, or Authority, or at Time of Appeal to the City Council if the Applicant is also the Appellant) In August 2011, the Glendale City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, which becomes effective on September 9, 2011 (“Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits campaign contributions from “applicants seeking entitlement,” their contractors and subcontractors (including their architects, engineers, and design professionals) while the application is “pending” and for 12 months thereafter. The Ordinance also prohibits Council Members from vo ting on any matter pertaining to an entitlement if the Council member has received a campaign contribution from the applicant seeking the entitlement, or certain contractors or subcontractors of the applicant, within the 12-month period preceding the vote.

Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip

Page 1 of 3 ends

Glendale City CouncilSeptember 30, 2025

Glendale City Council
September 30, 2025